2019-07-16 City Council - Full Agenda-24041
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
8
9.
10.
11.
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
JULY 16, 2019, 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 2, 2019
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 2, 2019
3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
4. Confirm Appointment of Board and Commission Candidate
5. WDFW contract for Fishing Pier
6. Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds School District for Meadowdale Preschool
7. Proposal for Personal Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
8. Probation Officer Court Position
9. Approve Contract for Jerrie Bevington
PRESENTATION
1. Students Saving Salmon Yearly Council Report 2019 (25 min)
AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
REPORTS ON COUNCIL COMMITTEES
1. Monthly Council Subcommittee Reports and Minutes (10 min)
ACTION ITEMS
1. Draft Urban Forest Management Plan (30 min)
2. Second Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment (15 min)
3. Civic Park Financing Ordinance (20 min)
4. City of Edmonds Facility Condition Assessment study by Mckinstry (15 min)
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
COUNCIL COMMENTS
CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(1).
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 16, 2019
Page 1
12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 16, 2019
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of July 2, 2019
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
07-02-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
JULY 29 2019
Elected Officials Present
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Mike Nelson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Tom Mesaros, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Mike Nelson, Councilmember (arrived 6:28 p.m.)
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Dave Earling, Mayor
Elected Officials Absent
none
1. CALL TO ORDER
Staff Present
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation
At 6:15 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION: REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION
The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room in closed session to discuss pending
or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(B).
3. INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE
At 6:45 p.m., the executive session concluded and the City Council was introduced to Zach Bauder,
a senior at Lakeside School, who has been selected as the next student representative starting in
September.
ADJOURN
At 6:54 p.m., the meeting was adjourned.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 1
Packet Pg. 4
4.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of July 2, 2019
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
07-02-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 5
4.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
July 2, 2019
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Michael Nelson, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Scott James, Finance Director
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
Council President Fraley-Monillas requested the order of Items 6.1, Fund Balance / Reserve Policy
Discussion, and 6.2, Civic Park Financing, be reversed. Mayor Earling advised Item 4.7, Lynnwood Mazda
Pedestrian Easement and 4.8, Wassall Pedestrian Easement at the NE Corner of 639 2nd Ave, had been
withdrawn by Public Works.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Council President Fraley-Monillas requested Item 10 be removed from the Consent Agenda and reminded
that Items 7 and 8 had been removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS,
TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 25, 2019
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 1
Packet Pg. 6
4.2.a
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL JOINT MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 25, 2019
3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 25, 2019
4. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL RETREAT MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2019
5. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
9. POSTPONE PUBLIC HEARING FOR 184TH STREET SW STREET VACATION
5. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT
1. ORDINANCE LAND USE PERMIT DECISION -MAKING AND QUASI-JUDICIAL
PROCESS (formerly Item 4.10)
Council President Fraley-Monillas advised she removed this item from the Consent Agenda so she could
vote against it.
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, to
APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4154, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING VARIOUS PROCEDURES CONTAINED IN THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3),
COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON AND
BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Pat Waddell, Edmonds, a resident living close to Civic Park and a member of the Project Advisory
Committee, thanked Carrie Hite for her years of leadership on the Civic Park project. She will be missed
by everyone who worked with her on Civic Park over the last several years. It appears the Council is
considering two choices, 1) seek a bond issue for the $3.5M need to complete the City's budget for the
park, or 2) seek a Bond Anticipation Note (BAN) first. She spoke in favor of moving forward with bond
financing for several reasons. First, the Mayor and existing Councilmembers are familiar with the Civic
Park development history. With upcoming elections, there will be a new Mayor and Councilmembers who
will need to get up to speed on the City's business and study the Civic Park background materials before
they will be comfortable making a decision, which may delay the park schedule. Second, the acquisition
and development of Civic Park has been in the Comprehensive Plan since 1976; bond financing will be the
final action in its long history. The City also has a long history of using bonds for legacy projects such as
Marina Beach, the Frances Anderson Center and Brackett's Landing. It is a natural fit to continue with bond
funding to complete Civic Park. Moving directly to bonding allows the City to lock in low interest rates;
delaying a funding decision with a BAN would add fees to the project and delaying a decision also runs the
risk of higher interest rates in the future. She urged the Council to move directly to a decision in favor of
bonding, giving citizens and neighbors the reassurance that there will be a steady ship during these times
of change.
Joe Malan, Edmonds, relayed his and his wife's concerns, they feel like they are in void with regard to
what will happen next and are interested in communication between the City Council and the person
designated to lead Civic Park development. With all the years of planning such as town meetings, surveys,
etc., he questioned when the public will be informed of the strategy for Civic Park. As a neighbor to the
park, it would be helpful to know who will take the torch and move the project. Second, with regard to the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 2
Packet Pg. 7
4.2.a
funding gap, he expressed support for the muni process. It is an adequate way to move forward and he
recommend the Council pursue it. They also feel the gift catalog is a great idea to solicit funds from the
public. He summarized this is an unbelievable opportunity to create a special place for citizens, a park in
the heart of the City. With all the effort Ms. Hite has put into the park, he suggested the Council consider
renaming it Hite Park.
Lee Kimmelman, Edmonds, referred to last week's discussion about changing the rules about pets in
public places. He supported some of the changes, noting even with the existing rules there is a lack of
enforcement and education of the public such as off -leash dogs. If the regulations are relaxed, education
and enforcement will be required, acknowledging enforcement affected the budget. Next, he recalled about
the Save the Beach effort and discussions about beach access for emergency vehicles. He also recalled
discussion about Hwy 99 and safety at the beach and his comments about the disconnect between safety
and emergency response. The Council agenda included discussion about emergency access to the beach
and he questioned whether emergency access to the beach was the right discussion. A more important
discussion is the long term solution to address increased train and ferry traffic and getting people across the
tracks. Developing a temporary solution just for emergency services is short sighted. He urged the Council
to set the tone now for the next Council, to focus on long term solutions instead of temporary solutions that
will ultimately need to be replaced.
Jim Landers, Edmonds, member of Edmonds South Snohomish County Historical Society, along with
Board Members Ann Wood and Jerry Freeland, informed the Council about a new public exhibit, a cedar
carving done by Ty Juvenil, a Native American artist with the Tulalip Tribes that represents the Edmonds
Marsh as it looked long ago. He circulated illustrations of the carving that will be located in front of the
museum. The Board has been thinking about how to recognize Edmonds' Native American and appreciates
the Council's similar efforts. They have been working with City staff about size and location and work to
be done on the plaza area in front of the museum to accommodate it.
Dick Van Hollebeke, Edmonds, former Councilmember and a member of Civic Playfield Project Advisory
Committee, on behalf himself and his wife, said as longtime residents, they have seen a lot of things happen.
He referred to stressful occurrences in the past 2-3 weeks regarding the Waterfront Connector and the
resignation of two employees, specifically Ms. Hite for whom he had the highest regard. He referred to
things that were aired in public media, commenting part of the problem was the way electeds treat staff.
One of the reasons he ran for Council originally was the Council and staff were at cross purposes. The
Council represents 42,000 people who care about the City and want the best to happen. He had no problem
with disagreeing, discussing, and even arguing but encouraged electeds to treat staff and people who come
before them with courtesy and dignity. With regard to Civic Park and the authorization for funding, he
echoed Ms. Waddell and Mr. Malan's comments, relaying it demonstrates to the public a 3-year process
and a Master Plan unanimously approved by six members of the Council who were present. The issue of
financing has been thoroughly discussed and he urged the Council to get on with it, to authorize a 20-year
bond which is affordable and allows future citizens to help pay for it which is appropriate. He urged the
Council to move ahead with unanimity and show the citizens they can pull together.
Cam Tripp, Edmonds, thanked Ms. Hite for her work in Edmonds, commenting his kids love Edmonds'
parks and beaches and he has told his friends in Redmond they are lucky she is coming to their city.
Speaking on behalf of the 12,500 people who have signed the petition, thousands of whom are Edmonds'
voters, the petition is the temporary beach insurance to ensure no funny business happens and the Council
does not go back on their commitment not to build on the beach. He referred to a comment by Council
President Fraley-Monillas in October, "I ask you why DOT, State of Washington and the railroad have all
contributed funds to the success of this project. I believe this to be another shell game being played; only a
matter of time before this emergency access will be routinely used for ferry loading and unloading to benefit
DOT, State of Washington and the railroad. All it takes is a change in Council and hundreds of cars running
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 3
Packet Pg. 8
through our downtown neighbors, destroying our way of life." He said the promises that are made about
not building on the beach have an expiration date, the upcoming election, and he and others want to ensure
this decision will stick and promises about funding are adhered to. The 12,500 people who signed the
petition will activate if necessary. Next, he referred to the importance of naming things that aren't named,
recalling orcas have scientific names but they also have names like Waverider and Mike. According to the
inventory, the beach does not have a name; things that are named matter more to people than an area
between certain tidelines and street names. Last week the Council discussed land acknowledgement, this is
an opportunity to go beyond acknowledging the people who were here before us and ask for their help in
naming the beach.
Diana White, Edmonds, representing Hazel Miller Foundation as a board member and a private citizen on
the Civic Project Advisory Committee, encouraged the Council to approve one of the bond financing
options presented tonight so that Civic can finally become the crown jewel of Edmonds. The Hazel Miller
Foundation has always been 100% committed to the redevelopment of Civic, so much so that when the
City's grant asked for $1 M, the foundation approved $1.5M. That is how much they believe in the strong
and visionary leadership of Parks Director Carrie Hite and Mayor Dave Earling. The planning, process,
public engagement and the work of City staff and Walker Macy that moved the project from an idea to
where it is today should serve as lesson in how public projects should be in the City. She thanked Carrie
Hite, one of the most capable parks directors in the State for her leadership and said she will be dearly
missed. Multiagency projects like this that bridge together state grants, private foundations and City funding
are difficult and time consuming projects. She urged the Council to keep this project moving forward by
approving one of funding options tonight.
7. ACTION ITEMS
2. CIVIC PARK FINANCING
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained she presented to the City Council about a month ago
and to the Finance Committee a few weeks ago. Tonight's presentation is regarding Civic Park financing
options. Several speakers mentioned the history of this project, it has been in the Comprehensive Plan since
1976. When she first joined the City 8'/2 years ago she often heard from the community and the Council
about purchasing Civic and making it a park. She met with Edmonds School District many times; the
property was a buy and hold property for them and they were not ready to sell and liked the arrangement
with the City caring for the property and using it for the community. When the District was ready to sell,
they approached the City due to the First Right of Refusal to purchase the property. Mayor Earling and she
negotiated with the District, staff wrote grants, and the City was able to purchase the property for $1.9M,
considerably less than its value. The City acquired $1.5M in grants and the City contributed $400,000.
Ms. Hite explained once the City purchased the property, a robust public process was created for the 8-acre
legacy park. In all her years as a parks director, deputy director and other municipal positions, she has never
seen so many people voice their opinion about a park. Hundreds attended open houses and there were
thousands of hits on the online open house. She still has people stop her on the street asking about Civic; it
is in everyone's hearts and minds. Over the past year the City worked on the design process with Walker
Macy and submitted several grants to help fund the development. There is a gap of about $3.OM to $3.5M,
although that is a schematic cost estimate; a closer cost estimate will be available by September. If the
Council proceeds with bond financing, a better number will be available before bonds are sold. She
reviewed:
0 Civic Park Funding Options
Projected Expenses' $11,885,400
Projected Revenues $8,830,000
Gap in Construction Budget' $3,055,400
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 4
Packet Pg. 9
4.2.a
Stormwater Mitigation' $ 500,000
Project Funding Gap $3,555,400
' See budget sheet in Council packet for breakdown
'Estimated
Finance Director Scott James relayed the Finance Committee's recommendation to request Council
authority to issue a bond or Bond Anticipation Note (BAN). A BAN is a short-term loan issued in advance
of a future bond issue, and is repaid from the proceeds of the bond issuance. He introduced Scott Bauer,
NW Municipal Advisors, who prepared the bond schedules. Mr. James reviewed:
• Pros and Cos of Issuing Bonds vs. Issuing BAN
o Pros for issuing bonds
1. Take advantage of low interest rates
2. Establish funding for project
3. Also positions City to take advantage timely bidding
o Cons for issuing bonds
1. Current cost estimate is only from schematic design
2. Still deciphering Stormwater mitigation costs
o Pros for issuing BAN
1. Gives us time to finalize costs
2. Establishes intent to fund project
3. Also positions City to take advantage timely bidding
4. Provides cushion to pursue private giving options
o Cons for issuing a BAN
1. Interest rates may go up
2. Change in leadership / Council may delay project
3. Additional borrowing cost
• All -in interest for Cost Scenarios
Bond Amount
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
$2.5M
2.88%
3.01%
3.12%
$3.OM
2.84%
2.98%
3.09%
$3.5M
2.81%
2.96%
3.06%
• Comparison of 20, 25 & 30 Year Bond Debt Service Payments
$2.5 Million Debt Service Pa ments
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
Payment Totals
$3,329,650
$3,596,750
$3,894,150
$ over 20 Year Bond
--
$267,100
$564,500
% over 20 Year bond
0.0%
8.0%
17.0%
$3.0 Million Debt Service Pa ments
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
Payment Totals
$3,973,200
$4,303,000
$4,647,050
$ over 20 Year Bond
--
$329,800
$673,850
% over 20 Year bond
0.0%
8.3%
17.0%
$2.5 Million Debt Service Pa ments
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
Payment Totals
$4,619,950
$5,011,600
$5,402,800
$ over 20 Year Bond
--
$381,650
$782,850
% over 20 Year bond
0.0%
8.3%
16.9%
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 5
Packet Pg. 10
4.2.a
Estimated annual debt service schedule illustrating principal, interest and total debt service by year
for $2.5, $3.0 and $3.5M for 20, 25 and 30 years
Comparison of Average 20, 25 and 30 year bond Debt Service payments
$2.5 Million Debt Service Payments
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
Average Payment
166,483
$143,870
$129,805
$ over 20 Year Bond
--
$(22,613)
$(36,678)
% over 20 Year bond
0.0%
-13.6%
-22.0%
$3.0 Million Debt Service Payments
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
Average Payment
$198,660
$172,120
$154,902
$ over 20 Year Bond
--
$(26,540)
$(43,758)
% over 20 Year bond
0.0%
-13.4%
-22.0%
$2.5 Million Debt Service Payments
20 Year
25 Year
30 Year
Average Payment
$230,998
$200,064
$180,093
$ over 20 Year Bond
--
$(30,934)
$(50,904)
% over 20 Year bond
0.0%
-13.4%
-22.0%
Ms. Hite reviewed the City's historical pattern of issuing bonds:
• 12/31/19 Outstanding Governmental Debt
0 2012 LTGO Refunding Bonds
■ 1993 Public Works Building
■ 1993 City Hall, Library, Frances Anderson Center, Streets
■ 2001 Marina Beach
■ 2002 Performing Arts Center)
0 2016 Chase Bank Loan
■ 2006 HVAC Project
■ 2007 Frances Anderson Center seismic
■ 2007 Energy Conservation
o Public Works Trust Fund Loan
■ 2003 Street Construction Loans
■ 2004 Street Construction Loans
■ 2006 Street Construction Loans
o Total $5,500,607
Ms. Hite summarized the City has not issued bonds since 2007 and has the capacity. There has been a
tradition to issue bonds every 5-8, interest rates are low and it is timely to consider issuing bonds.
Mr. James reviewed
Graph illustrating outstanding governmental debt before bonding for civic park
o Approximately $5.5M outstanding in 2019
o Current issues will be retired in 2030
Spreadsheet illustrating debt service payment costs
o Current Annual Debt Service Requirements (2019-2039) from Fund 001, Fund 126 and Total
o Estimated Debt Service w/$3.5M Civic Bond + current annual debt service
■ With Civic Park bond, debt service costs in 2020 would increase from $523,391 to
$624,067
- In 2021 debt service costs would be $627,066
- In 2022, debt service costs decrease to $459,596
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 6
Packet Pg. 11
4.2.a
Graph of annual debt service comparison before and after Civic Park Bond
Graph of outstanding governmental before and after Civic Park Bond
Next steps:
1. Council Decision on Bonds vs. BANS
2. Council authorization for Administration to engage Bond Counsel and Financial Advisor
3. Parks Department to determine final costs
4. Parks Department to implement private giving options
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked which two bonds will be paid off in the next few years. Mr. James
answered a portion of the 2016 Chase Bank Loan; when the debt was refinanced, several issues were rolled
into the refinancing so only a portion will be paid off. Council President Fraley-Monillas observed the 2016
Chase Bank Loan is the HVAC Project, Frances Anderson Center Seismic and Energy Conservation. She
asked which of those would be paid off by 2026. Mr. James said the Frances Anderson Center Seismic.
debt will be paid off by 2021. Council President Fraley-Monillas about the HVAC Project and Energy
Conservation. Mr. James said he did not have the payment schedule for other debt with him tonight. He
offered to send it to Council tomorrow.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mr. James for all the work done on this, and was glad to see the cost
comparison on the 25 and 30 year bonds. She pointed out the Performing Arts Center bond is a
receivable/payable between the City and PFD so it is technically a wash. With regard to bond vs. BAN, she
preferred bonds due to the rates and an amount of $3.5M as she anticipated costs will increase due to
unknowns such as the water table and peat.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there were plans to refund/refinance any bonds in the near future. Mr.
Bauer said the next call date on the bonds is 2022 so that is the next opportunity. Councilmember Buckshnis
anticipated rates will stay stable or decrease due to the volatility in Washington D.C.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked staff for their work. He also favored bonding because rates are artificially
low and he anticipated they will increase in the not too distant future. With regard to bonding capacity, he
recalled discussion about potentially bonding for other projects such as the pyrolysis upgrade at the WWTP
and asked if the City had plenty of bonding capacity. Mr. James answered yes. Councilmember Teitzel
favored the 20 year bond, not finding it advantageous to drag it out to 30 years and pay the additional
interest. A 20 year bond also allows future citizens to bear the burden of some of the project costs.
Councilmember Mesaros added his thanks/appreciation for the thorough work on this project. He had been
in favor of a BAN to allow an opportunity to seek philanthropic gifts. He referred to the comments from
Ms. White, representing the Hazel Miller Foundation, and their $1.5M contribution. He anticipated there
were others who would consider contributing. However, he has shifted his thinking because of Ms. Hite's
decision to go to Redmond. Her involvement and energy were crucial to the success of philanthropic gifts.
With her departure, the professional equity she brings to the table will be lost and it will take time for the
new parks director to build that same level of equity in the community. He was in favor of a 20 year bond
and asked whether it would be possible to do $3.7M, knowing there could be unanticipated costs. Mr. James
answered yes. Councilmember Mesaros said he would look to Mr. James' professional recommendation
about the amount when the project reaches that point.
Councilmember Tibbott said he mostly concurred with the idea for 20 year bond. He asked whether there
had been a plateau in accelerating construction costs or could costs continue to accelerate. Ms. Hite
responded the cost estimates for Civic take into consideration escalation for construction in 2020. The
City's experience with the Waterfront Redevelopment project indicates construction cost acceleration has
not plateaued; the bids for that project were very high compared to the engineer's estimate. Some allowance
for escalation is built into the budget.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 7
Packet Pg. 12
4.2.a
Councilmember Tibbott said that is another reason not to put this project off for 2-3 years while funds are
raised because it adds to the potential of higher construction costs. In the event stormwater mitigation
requires more funding, he asked what funding opportunities there would be if the City was already locked
into bonds. Ms. Hite said if there was Council support to bond, the Parks Department would work with the
Finance Department before bonds are sold. Better numbers will be available in September when the
stormwater mitigation has been figured out and more costs determined at the 60% design level. The Council
could move forward with bonds and determine the exact cost in September.
Councilmember Tibbott inquired about the timing of issuance. Mr. Bauer explained the Council can pass a
bond delegation ordinance ahead of time that authorizes staff to complete the sale. The ordinance would
include a not- to -exceed amount, the principal amount, and etc. The bonding process takes approximately
three months; if the Council authorizes the bonds, the bond sale would be late September/early October.
Councilmember Tibbott liked the idea that there were people and/or organizations in the community
interested in contributing to Civic Park and said perhaps there would be opportunities in Phase 1 that either
aren't budgeted or could be enhance with giving options. Phase 2 would be an opportunity for grant funding
and charitable giving.
Councilmember Tibbott commented an aspect that hasn't been discussed is the quality of life surrounding
a dormant/decaying park while funds are raised. That is not the quality of life the Council wants and it could
present some safety issues and opportunity for criminal activity. He saw strong merits in moving forward
with development of the park, especially knowing there were General Fund monies available to cover the
bond. He looked forward to the completed park being a magnet for people, both from a tourism aspect as
well as an economic vitality aspect. He summarized for those reasons he was in favor of bonds.
Councilmember Johnson reminded the Council that the Revised Code of Washington states cities must
provide police, sewer, water and transportation; parks are not required, they are optional. The City may
want a park but parks are not needed for the health, safety and welfare of the community according to state
law. She had several concerns about the proposed bonds, first, the City will need to pay for debt service
and bond counsel. She recalled with the Public Works bonds, for $1OM in bonds, the City ultimately paid
$15M. She said Edmonds High School was built in 1909 so the park has been there for 110 years; it's not
going anywhere and people use it every day although it may not be optimal.
Councilmember Johnson suggested a pay-as-you-go method, relying on grants and gifts. Using that method,
the City could accomplish what it wants, maybe not all at once but certainly within 110 years. The City
paid $100,000 for the Civic Master Plan. She was a member of the Advisory Committee, everyone worked
in good faith and were happy with the product. Then she learned that Civic Field is prehistoric lake that has
decayed vegetation, peat and turf that is characterized by holding a tremendous amount of ground water,
an aspect she had significant concerns about. First and foremost, planners and architects have learned to
design with nature, not fight it, change it or modify it. She needed to know a lot more about that aspect of
the project. The City has many large projects and she wanted to know how Civic Park was prioritized with
other major parks such as Marina Beach and the Edmonds Marsh which will also require tremendous
funding. She summarized she needed more information; for her it was not about bonds versus BANS, and
she preferred a pay-as-you-go option.
Councilmember Nelson said he attended several of the public open houses. In light of the talk about the
difficulty of government getting along, this project is a textbook example of how to do it the right way, get
public input and use that input to influence the design and garner the support of City staff, Ms. Hite and the
entire Council for the project. He supported moving forward expeditiously and supported issuing bonds.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 8
Packet Pg. 13
4.2.a
Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the Projected Expenses slide in the presentation and asked
whether stormwater mitigation was usually funded by the Stormwater Utility. Ms. Hite answered every
construction project has to take care of their own stormwater.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
HAVE ADMINISTRATION CONTINUE DOWN THE PATH OF DOING A $3.5 MILLION TO $3.8
MILLION BOND ISSUE TO OCCUR BASED ON WHAT WE FIND OUT IN THE NEXT COUPLE
MONTHS. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH FOSTER PEPPER
TO SERVE AS THE CITY'S BOND COUNSEL. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER
JOHNSON VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT WITH NW
MUNICIPAL ADVISORS TO SERVE AS CITY'S FINANCIAL ADVISOR. MOTION CARRIED (6-
1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO.
1. FUND BALANCE / RESERVE POLICY DISCUSSION
Finance Director Scott James thanked Councilmembers Buckshnis, Mesaros and Teitzel for their input on
the policy during Finance Committee meetings.
• Purpose of Fund Balance/Reserve Policy
o "It is the policy of the City of Edmonds to provide for the continuity of City government by
planning ahead for economic uncertainties and unforeseen or unplanned major expenditures."
• General Fund — Fund Balance Reserve History
Year
Fund Balance
New Policy Fund Balance
Assigned Fund Balance
2007
$5,807,8880
$5,124,288
2008
$3,258,421
$5,325,084
2009
$4,138,406
$5,523,316
2010
$4,925,008
$5,723,009
2011
$5,705,633
$5,171,344
2012
$4,635,301
$6,176,017
2013
$6,834,380
$5,532,913
2014
$6,446,091
$6,724,798
2015
$9,359,437
$6,808,069
2016
$9,841,719
$7,600,516
2017
$10,273,342
$7,206,802
2018
$9,124,013
$7,594,249
$2,000,000
Conti ngency Reserve Fund — Fund Balance Reserve History
Year
Fund Balance
RCW Limited Fund Balance
2012
$5,282,000
$2,172,992
2013
$5,376,796
$2,079,465
2014
$5,445,337
$2,288,404
2015
$4,677,030
$2,540,807
2016
$5,367,841
$2,766,068
2017
$5,447,144
$3,078,163
2018
$5,564,259
$3,415,232
• Proposed Policy
o Article I introduces the purpose and objectives
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 9
Packet Pg. 14
4.2.a
o Article II discusses criteria that should be considered and include:
1. Volatility
2. Fund size
3. Purpose of reserve
4. Bond ratings
o Article III establishes the General Fund Operating Reserve at 16% of General Fund Adopted
Operating Expenditure Budget
■ Limitations of Fund Use
■ Reserve replenishment
o Article IV establishes the reserve target for Contingency Reserve Fund
■ The reserve balance cannot exceed RCW mandated limits of $0.375 / $1,000 of assessed
property values in the city, OR
■ 4% of the General Fund Adopted Operating Expenditure Budget
■ Limitations of Fund Use
■ Reserve replenishment
o Article V establishes reporting criteria
During the May 7' Council meeting, Council requested the following additions to the
Replenishment Report to Council:
1. Must include a discussion of how the reserves were used
2. Whether it is anticipated additional reserves will be needed or not needed in the following
budget cycle
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Councilmembers Teitzel and Mesaros for assisting Mr. James, Mr.
Turley and she in developing the policy. She assured the City has had reserves that are reflected in the
budget book, they are just not in the right categories. Mr. James has been very conservative for a long time,
there have been General Fund reserves and the City is in good shape. She asked if Mr. James wanted
motions to remove the Risk Management Fund 011. Mr. James recommended Council approve the
resolution adopting the Fund Balance Policy. Staff intends to bring a second quarter budget amendment to
Council later this month that will include transfers from the Risk Management Fund and transferring excess
funds from the Contingency Reserve to the General Fund.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the old policy included 4% and 8% and Risk Management at 2% and
8% - 16%. The new policy does not include a "floor;" she expressed interest in including a floor of 8%.
Redmond has 8% for their basic policy reserve but they also have a head tax and plenty of money so she
understood why their reserve was so low. Mr. James said the replenishment section of the policy requires
the administration to present a plan to Council. If the reserves were used for unforeseen expenses,
administration would be required to share a plan with Council regarding how the reserves would be
replenished. He was hopeful the reserves would never go 8% but unforeseen needs cannot be anticipated.
He recalled he significant recession that reduced reserves for three years. It is hoped that can be avoided
which is one of the reasons for a robust Fund Balance policy.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked James and fellow Councilmembers for their input on the policy. He was
comfortable with the policy as proposed. The City needs to have a healthy Reserve Policy to get through
rainy days which will be coming. The region has been riding the crest of an exceptionally long economic
recovery, now at a record level 161 months of recovery, but it will turn at some point and the City needs a
cushion for the time when revenues begin to sag. Two of the City's larger tax revenue sources, sales tax
from car sales and from restaurants/bars, are volatile and when the economy goes sour, those tax revenues
suffer. The City needs reserves in place to weather those storms. He was satisfied that 20% was the right
amount and he supported the policy as presented.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 10
Packet Pg. 15
4.2.a
Councilmember Mesaros commented it had been good to work with Mr. James and Councilmembers on
this policy. He agreed the floor was self-correcting. There have been 17 recessions since WWII, the 18'h
will come eventually. There have also been 17 recoveries and the 181 recovery will also follow. During
those economic downturns it is prudent to have reserves; this a good step toward accomplishing that.
Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Councilmembers' comments. He asked how volatility affected
releasing or using reserve funds as a certain amount of volatility can be expected in economic cycles and
the City is somewhat dependent on cyclical revenues. He asked how reserve funds are used in the type of
volatility the City is likely to experience. Mr. James recalled when the policy was presented to Council
earlier, he included three slides that showed the volatility of three revenue sources - sales tax, property tax
from EMS and development related revenues. During the recession, those three revenue sources combined
to approximately $13M in declined revenues. With that much volatility, it is prudent to have reserves to
offset it. The reserve fund cannot be expected to solve all the City's financial problems; offsets such as
reduced need for services will have to be considered to help balance the fund. Volatility is a very important
part and it is only a matter of time before there is another recessionary period when revenues from sales tax
and development will decline.
Councilmember Tibbott asked how elastic expenses are during downturn times and how reserve funds are
accessed during those times of volatility. Mr. James answered much of the elasticity of revenues depends
on the revenue to provide those services. For example, eating and drinking are the first to be cut when
people have to tighten their budgets. To access the funds, the Mayor has to present a plan declaring a
financial emergency. A simple majority of Council is required to approve use of the funds. The Mayor's
declaration will include what the emergency is, what funds will be required, etc. Council has to approve the
plan and authorize use of the funds.
Councilmember Johnson explained before The Reserve Policy was brought to the Finance Committee,
Councilmember Teitzel, Mr. James and she discussed it numerous times at the Long Range Financial
Planning meetings. She was confident this was an appropriate reserve policy.
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1433, ADOPTING THE FUND BALANCE / RESERVE POLICY.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked Mr. James if he thought a floor of 8% should be added. She referred to a
statement in the policy, "If the reserve is drawn down by 25-50%," noting 50% would be approximately
8%. Mr. James recommended not including a floor as that is addressed in the policy by the language
regarding replenishment.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if the policy could it be changed by a vote of the Council if it was
not working or there were issues. City Attorney Jeff Taraday answered the policy would be adopted by
resolution, so another resolution would be required to change it. Mr. James said the policy (Article VI) has
a five year review; every five years staff will present the policy to Council for discussion regarding the
merits, whether the reserve needed to be increased or decreased. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked
if the Council could review the policy in a year or change it at any time. Mr. Taraday answered yes.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess.
8. STUDY ITEMS
1. MULTI -FAMILY TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 11
Packet Pg. 16
4.2.a
Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty said this is an overview of the
existing program that the Council approved for two areas of the City. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested
he review the program in public to increase its visibility. No action is sought or required tonight. He
reviewed:
History
0 1995 - State Legislature created the Multi -Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) program
■ RCW 84.14
o To help spur redevelopment in lagging urban centers
o Fulfills GMA goals to encourage in -fill development in existing urban centers, thereby
reducing sprawl and promoting "smart growth"
o Provides for affordable housing
How it works
o MFTE provides incentive to developers to invest in "residential targeted areas" and include
affordable housing
o Residential targeted areas - mixed -use centers designated by cities in Comp Plans or Subarea
Plans to receive greater density of multifamily and commercial development
■ Council designated Westgate and Hwy 99 as residential targeted areas
Residential targeted areas
o Often called "urban villages" or "urban centers"
■ Walkable
■ Amenity -rich
■ Transit -supportive
■ Mixed -use areas
o Intended to accommodate future growth in housing and employment
o Designated by cities through Comp Plans or Subarea Plans per GMA
Barriers to redevelopment
o Notwithstanding a city's plans, transformation to "urban village" can be fraught with
challenges such as:
■ Competition from higher -rent locales (e.g., Seattle, Bellevue)
■ Complications with urban redevelopment:
- Unwilling property sellers
- Need to aggregate multiple properties
- Existing long-term leases
- Environmental remediation
■ Provision of below -market -rate housing requires some subsidy or incentive
o These factors can stall planned -for redevelopment and provision of affordable housing for
decades!
One small tool
o The MFTE program is one small tool to provide an incentive to developers and investors to
overcome these challenges and encourage development of multifamily and mixed -use projects
that include affordable housing
Program's Reach
o Many cities in Washington have implemented MFTE:
■ Near Edmonds
- Seattle
- Lynnwood
- Everett
- Kenmore
- Shoreline
- Marysville
- Mountlake Terrace
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 12
Packet Pg. 17
4.2.a
■ Statewide
Tacoma
Puyallup
Wenatchee
Spokane
SeaTac
Walla Walla
Yakima
Bellingham
Moses Lake
Bellevue
Auburn
Anacortes
Renton
Olympia
Issaquah
Kirkland
Vancouver
Tukwila
Burien
Federal Way
Des Moines
Bremerton
Kent
Covington
University Place
o In fact, because of program's widespread application Statewide, many developers have come
to consider the MFTE program as a necessary tool to help overcome the challenges of urban
redevelopment in all but the highest -rent housing markets
MFTE in Edmonds
o In July 2016 Edmonds City Council implemented the MFTE in Edmonds
o Starting with Westgate Mixed -Use Zone
o Extended the provision to Highway 99 Corridor in 2017
Program basics
o MFTE Program is applicable to:
■ Projects containing at least 20 dwelling units
■ Exempts residential improvement value ONLY
■ Nonresidential (commercial, e.g.) improvement value is NOT exempt
■ Land value is NOT exempt
■ 12-year exemption period if the project includes at least 20% of units as affordable to rent
or buy to low and moderate -income households
o Edmonds program provides:
■ 10% for low-income and 10% for moderate -income'
- Low income < 80% of County median income
$53,200 - 1 person 1
$60,800 - 2 person
$1,330/mo. rent + util. I
$1,520/mo. rent + util.
Moderate income < 115% of County median income
$76,475 - 1 person
1 $87,400 - 2 person
$1,912/mo. rent + util.
I $2,185/mo. rent + util.
NOTES: 1. 10%-10% split and 2. Use of County median income unique to Edmonds, as per 2017
amendments
Tax revenue implications
o Start with review of property tax basics:
■ City property tax rate is product of Council -approved annual tax levy (amount to be raised)
divided by City's total Assessed Valuation (AV).
■ The Council approved 2019 levy amount of $10,548,203
■ The City's AV was $9,107,284,679
■ Therefore, the City's property tax rate is approx. $1.1582 per $1000 of property value.
■ $500,000 house pays $579.10 in City property taxes
o How does partially exempted building fit into the equation?
■ Assume $5,000,000 mixed -use development.
- $1,000,000 -land and commercial component
- $4,000,000 - residential component, incl affordable housing
■ MFTE exempts the residential portion for 12 years.
■ This portion is not added to the City's AV and is not taxed.
■ However, increased land value and commercial portion are both added to City's AV and
are taxed.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 13
Packet Pg. 18
4.2.a
o Assuming no other changes (incl. same levy amount):
■ City's AV goes up by $1,000,000 to $9,108,284,679
■ City's property tax rate goes down to $1.1581/$1,000
■ $500,000 house pays $579.05 (40.05)
■ Project contributes $1,158.1 in property taxes from land and commercial portion
■ Residential portion is not added to the City's AV and is not added to tax rolls. Pays no
property tax for 12 years.
■ After 12 years residential portion is added to City's AV and contributes property tax
revenue
o Even during 12-year partial exemption period, project contributes:
■ Initial impact fees (transpo, parks)
■ Project's residents and businesses/customers pay:
- Sales taxes
- Utility taxes
- Gas taxes
o What if the project were NOT partially exempted?
■ All of new value would be added to AV
■ City's AV goes up by $5,000,000 to $9,112,284,679
■ City's property tax rate goes down to $1.1576/$1,000
■ $500,000 house pays $578.80 (40.30)
■ Project contributes $5,788 in property taxes from year 1
o Upshot:
■ $500,000 could theoretically pay $0.30 less in property taxes
■ But new project, incl. affordable hsg., may not occur
Westgate Village Project Example
0 91 total units
0 14 "moderate income" households (< 115% of County median income):
■ $1,445 to $2,250/month rent + util.*
0 5 low "income households" (< 80% of County median income):
■ $1,330 to $1,710/month rent +util.*
0 72 market rate units:
■ $1,490 to $2,380/month NOT including utilities
*Note: HUD utility allowance is $172 to $214 (depending on unit size)
MFTE impact summary
o MFTE is tool to encourage planned -for development and provide affordable housing (80% to
115% AMI)MFTE exempts residential value only for 12 years
o During exemption period project contributes:
- Initial impact fees for transportation and parks
- Property taxes from land and commercial component
- Sales, utility, gas taxes
o After 12 years the project contributes full property taxes
o No additional taxes paid by City taxpayers
Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed her understanding that staff had been contacted by a number of
people trying to figure out the MFTE. The City's portion of the taxes on the units also fund emergency
services such as police and fire. When the City does not collect that, she asked who pays for police and fire
services. Mr. Doherty said the budget is the same, the levy amount is set and taxes are based on that amount.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said in the Westgate example, 91 units and approximately 170 people
will be added but no addition funds are collected toward fire or police services. Mr. Doherty said this is the
part that's difficult to understand about how taxation works; the City always collects the same amount.
When the levy is set, the tax rate times the City's overall assessed value will produce that levy amount. The
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 14
Packet Pg. 19
4.2.a
City never gets less. If the question is does the project contribute on a proportionate basis for those 91 units,
he said for 12 years they are getting a little break to reach other values the City has established such as
affordable housing and growth in areas where development is desired.
Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed her understanding that the units do not pay taxes for 12 years
like other residents to the General Fund that pays for police and fire. Technically when they get a break for
12 years, 170 people aren't paying into the City's coffers for those services. Mr. Doherty agreed they would
not be paying property tax, but the City gets revenue from sales tax, utility tax and increased property value.
Until this year, the Westgate Village property was vacant and it was unknown how long it would have
remained vacant and the City would not have received any more revenue from it, no more property taxes
or increased land value. Once the property is occupied next week, the assessor will reassess the value of the
land and it will increase substantially in addition to revenue from the commercial spaces. The residents,
visitors and customers will pay the other taxes. While they are not paying the full amount of taxes that
project could pay during the 12 year period, the project may not have happened without MFTE as an
incentive and it certainly would not have included affordable housing. It is a bit theoretically with regard
to whether the development is not paying.
Council President Fraley-Monillas reiterated there would be 170 more people who are not paying for
infrastructure and for other things that existing citizens pay. Mr. Doherty clarified they won't pay as much.
Council President Fraley-Monillas commented then someone will have to pay their fair share. At some
point, the City will need to add staff. It was her understanding that a number of cities are considering moving
away from MFTE. Mr. Doherty said every city has the option to study it which some cities have done, but
none of them have discontinued it. Council President Fraley-Monillas said Shoreline is considering not
offering MFTE due to costs.
Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the Westgate Village project example, and asked if the
moderate income rate included utilities. Mr. Doherty said the low and moderate income rents both include
utilities; that allowance is $172/month rent for a studio and $214/month rent for a 2 bedroom. The market
rate renters are charged for utilities. Using the market rate unit as an example, $1490 rent plus $172/month
for a studio, versus $1330/month rent and no utilities.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked how many of the five low income units were studios. Mr. Doherty
answered two are studios, one 1-bedrom and one 2-bedroom. The moderate income units include 6-7
studios, five 1-bedroom and one 2-bedroom. Council President Fraley-Monillas said most people who have
contacted her cannot afford to pay $1330/month and feel that is really not low income for a studio. She
acknowledged this is a new building so there are amenities that would not be found in a 20-year old building.
Councilmember Johnson said she was told that people who live in the 19 low and moderate income
households will not pay school taxes. Mr. Doherty said the exemption is for all property taxes. This
incentive was created to encourage developers to include affordable housing as well as encourage
development where a city plans for it. For the 12 years, the residential portion of the building will not
contribute property taxes. The property taxes will be paid because the tax rate for the entire City will
generate the levy amount. If they were paying, the levy would drop so slightly that a $500,000 house would
see about a $0.30 reduction in the City's portion of the property tax. He acknowledged the school tax portion
was larger than the City portion and might be more like $3.00. The building is not contributing directly to
school district via a property tax for the 12 years but they are contributing to utility tax, sales tax, gas tax,
and those residents may not live there without the incentive. Federal Way was one of the first cities in the
state to implement MFTE; the Federal Way Council understood using it to get the ball rolling and agreed
to look at it again in seven years to see if the ball was rolling enough that the incentive was no longer
needed.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 15
Packet Pg. 20
4.2.a
Councilmember Teitzel relayed his understanding there were five units set aside for "low income"
individuals, people earning < 80% of County median income. He asked what that would be if it were
adjusted to 50% of the AMI. Mr. Doherty said a City Council implementing this program has the authority
to adjust the percentage. If that were done, Edmonds would be only place it was different, other than Seattle,
and could potentially be less competitive to developers if the percentage was higher in an adjacent city.
Councilmember Teitzel said no matter where the threshold is set, someone will view it as not fair and the
rent more than they can afford.
Councilmember Teitzel asked about a phase -out plan at the end of the 12 year period when the rents would
change to market rate. Mr. Doherty said there is not a plan necessarily other than people know about the
exemption period and a long-term renter could save up. The legislature considered allowing cities to add
another 12 years.
Councilmember Mesaros said one of the key items that complicates this issue is the sense that whenever
the school district, a city or county levies, they receive the accumulation of all the dollars. What actually
happens is an aggregate number is set which is divided by the property values. Learning that nuance is
crucial to understanding whether the City collects more or less money. Even small improvements of the
commercial level brings down the tax for all due to the added property value that would not occur if the
project was not built.
Councilmember Tibbott said it's obvious a program like this incentivizes development in the areas of the
City where new development is desired. If the desire is for that new development to occur in a denser
manner where there is transit, it is wise to incentivize development in those areas versus just letting it
happen across the City in wherever manner developers want. This is one of the ways to do good planning
and to incentivize development in those areas. Mr. Doherty provided an example: when the Council
approved the Hwy 99 plan, there was discussion about how to get development to occur and the Council
agreed to apply MFTE to some areas of Hwy 99.
Councilmember Tibbott inquired about impact fees, noting impact fees in a highly developed urban area
are more costly than in a flat dirt field. For example, old sidewalks and curb ramps may need to be upgraded,
etc. He asked how paying impact fees helps with redevelopment of the City in crucial areas. Mr. Doherty
said the cost of development overall is higher per square foot higher in a redevelopment scenario compared
to a green field. hi an urban environment, there may need to be aggregation of properties, remediation,
building demolition, etc. In addition, impact fees are often higher due to impacts. He recalled Westgate had
$1M in fees. Councilmember Tibbott observed those fees help improve streets, walkways, and
transportation. Mr. Dougherty agreed.
Councilmember Tibbott recalled when the MFTE was instituted for Hwy 99, a 70% AMI was used. Mr.
Doherty said 70% was discussed but 80% was retained. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his understanding
that if students moved into the Westgate project, there is federal funding paid for those students. Mr.
Doherty did not have facts or figures regarding that.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked how long ago the Council approved MFTE. Mr. Doherty answered
2016 for Westgate and 2017 for Hwy 99. Council President Fraley-Monillas observed there had been no
other developments other than Westgate. Mr. Doherty said there are two on Hwy 99 in preliminary process.
Council President Fraley-Monillas commented in the last three years there had not been a lot of property
owners interested in utilizing MFTE, like was thought there would be. Mr. Doherty answered he was unsure
a rush of developers was expected. Westgate is still a more difficult place to develop compared to most
commercial areas in the Puget Sound region. The zoning on Hwy 99 is generous which is the reason there
are two projects in some stage of permitting. Westgate only allows up to four stories in two places, the rest
is two and three stories. Most of the Seattle area is 4-6 stories plus. A lot of developers look at opportunities
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 16
Packet Pg. 21
4.2.a
in the region and respond to places where they can build more. Edmonds would not get the rush that some
cities have gotten; for example Lynwood has seen a rush of development due to higher allowable heights.
Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested it may be advantageous on Hwy 99 to consider other
developer bonuses versus MFTE. She pointed out the low income rent, $1330/month for a studio is not low
income for someone on social security like many veterans, disabled and seniors which is $800/month.
Development on Hwy 99 utilizing other developer incentives may provide an opportunity for really low
income housing for people who need transportation and housing on the corridor.
Mr. Doherty said it was unfortunate that the State language calls that low, it is not what many consider low,
but it is lower; below market would be a better way to say it. There are many programs to address the
various levels of income; the next level is 60% which is addressed by the low income tax credits at the state
level. A lot of developers use those tax credits to develop 60% such as SHAG and other private developers.
Lower than that is government or agency -sponsored housing. Tax credits are a state program that provides
cash to developers for 60% AMI housing. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested that could be
considered along Hwy 99, pointing out the Section 8 housing voucher system is basically closed and has a
lengthy waiting list. She was interested in ways to incentivize development and create rents that are
affordable to those on fixed income. Mr. Doherty looked forward to the new Housing Commission
exploring that.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not consider the Westgate Village rents low or moderate income;
when utilities are added, they are almost market rate. Mr. Doherty said utilities are included in the low and
moderate income rents. Councilmember Buckshnis said the City is now incentivizing developers to do all
residential, e.g. the GRE apartments on Hwy 99 that are all residential. One of the purposes of MFTE is for
social equity which is difficult to add to a calculation. She asked if GRE was using MFTE. Mr. Doherty
said they have applied for it. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the AMI could be lower than 80%. Mr.
Doherty said development in Westgate is required to have commercial on the first floor. On Hwy 99, there
is flexibility to have a commercial building and a residential building. With regard to affordability, it is
currently 80% for low income in Westgate and Hwy 99; the Council has the authority to set the AMI
wherever they want. However, if it is too low, developers may not respond.
For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Doherty explained once a developer submitted an application they are
vested to regulations in place at the time. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested using Westgate or GRE as
an example using 50%-77% AMI. She reiterated people may not realize the social equity aspect.
2. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON NEXT STEPS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE
WATERFRONT
Council President Fraley-Monillas said this item is based on the conversation the Council had last week.
Council is asked to discuss the process for moving forward on an alternative to the emergency crossing in
the event of an emergency on the other side of the tracks. Things to consider during the discussion should
include but are not inclusive:
1. Which alternatives should be considered going forward? Ask the Council to revisit the set of
alternatives that were considered previously but not chosen as a preferred alternative amongst other
alternatives? Or is there a need to start from scratch?
a. Does the Council want to look at short-term solutions, then long-term solutions, or just long-
term solutions?
2. What process does the City Council envision for consideration of the future alternatives?
Opportunity for Councilmembers to offer suggestions for alternatives such as forming a
commission made up of citizens? Police? Fire? Business? Council? Staff? To explore alternatives.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 17
Packet Pg. 22
4.2.a
3. Does the City Council want to set up a separate inquiry from the alternatives inquiry to better
understand where we are failing in our public outreach process so that we can understand the fatal
flaws in future projects earlier in the process?
4. Information Needed:
a. Review of cancelled project reports
b. Review of community input and how to do better
c. Review of other committees, transportation, safety, climate, etc.
d. Environmental impacts
e. Neighborhood impacts
f. Business impacts
Council President Fraley-Monillas said she has talked to about five Councilmembers and everybody has a
different idea of where and how to start.
Councilmember Mesaros agreed the Council needs to make some choices. He commented there was a very
long process to reach a recommended location and design and then that was determined not to be acceptable
to the community. The City is also in the midst of one of the biggest election years in the City in a long
time. There will be major turnover on the Council and a new Mayor. This may be an appropriate time to
step back. Even if the location were approved and everyone happy, it would be another two years before
the connector was built due the environmental work, planning, fundraising, etc. There is no need to rush
this between now and the beginning of the new year.
Councilmember Mesaros agreed there were things to learn from the process. Councilmember Teitzel and
he are the only two Councilmembers who are voluntarily retiring; others may retire due to election results.
He suggested Councilmember Teitzel and he consider how to engage the public and report back to the
Council. The success of the new Civic Park was due to the positive community engagement by the City.
Other examples include Marina Beach and Hwy 99. The upcoming parking study will be another
opportunity to engage the community. He summarized his suggestion to pause on the connector project
until after election and consider how to best engage the community on other projects that are in process.
Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Councilmember Mesaros' suggestion in general, recognizing it will
take time, energy and investment by Council and staff. He reiterated his suggestion that while the process
for the Waterfront Connector is fresh in everyone's mind, there be some review of what the task force
recommended, with a focus on the short term safety options that were recommended in the report. The
purpose would be to, 1) recollect how we got to this place, and 2) realize there are some good options for
short term remediation that have not been put in place. He did not anticipate the review would that take a
lot of time, maybe no more than 1/2 hour of Council time. He also wanted to hear from the Police Chief or
other first responders, recalling the Police Chief oversees emergency planning. As Council President
Fraley-Monillas mentioned, police and fire have emergency plans in place to deal with emergencies west
of the railroad tracks. The City is also planning to hire a risk management staff person; one of their priories
could be to examine safety procedures.
Councilmember Tibbott commented it could be a Council driven process, not an administrative process. It
could be done through the Council Legislative Assistant or with an outside facilitator at a half day or 2-
hour workshop that captures the community sentiment before it's lost. He summarized those are short term
ideas that could be examined and would not require a lot of time or a large investment.
Councilmember Teitzel recalled Councilmember Mesaros and he discussed the fact that although the
Council and City believe they are engaging the public in a meaningful way throughout the process, there
have been a number of issues such as the Waterfront Connector, the Housing Strategy, the Edmonds
entrance sign on SR-104, parking on Civic Field, and the Tree Code where the public has not been happy.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 18
Packet Pg. 23
4.2.a
As a result, the Council is uncomfortable and frustrated, not productive, not efficient and certainly not cost
efficient. There needs to be a better process to engage the public early and in a meaningful way where they
can provide ideas, be assured their ideas will be fairly and fully vetted and get feedback throughout the
process. That is a bigger problem than the waterfront access and the City needs to work on that larger
problem first.
Councilmember Teitzel said Councilmember Mesaros and he are uniquely positioned because they are not
running for office so their review will not have a political overtone. He suggested Councilmember Mesaros
and he work on a process and once that process is vetted with the Council, the process be tried with the
public. He referred to a letter to the editor of My Edmonds News on June 23rd, Three Takeaways from the
Connector Controversy, that contains a number of good ideas that should be considered as a way to better
engage the public earlier in the process and in a more meaningful way. He agreed with Councilmember
Mesaros' idea to pause and work on a better communication process.
Councilmember Nelson appreciated the Council's helpful suggestions and ideas. He suggested doing two
things initially, 1) look at short term EMS response, and 2) assemble a group, possibly after the election,
that looks at a long term solution. He explained the options were ranked and scored using four criteria: 1)
improve reliable emergency access, 2) reduce delays at ferry loading and unloading, 3) reduce delays at at -
grade rail crossings, and 4) provide safe efficient intermodal connectivity. The concepts were ranked with
those four criteria weighted equally. If the immediate goal is emergency access to the west side of the tracks,
he suggested isolating that and ranking the options according to what provides immediate, reliable access
to the other side of the tracks. The fire department was not on the task force; the fire department should be
part of whatever short term solutions are considered as an equal partner in suggestions and ideas. He
summarized ultimately the question is what is the best plan for Edmonds.
Councilmember Buckshnis said WRIA 8 uses many different categories in their scoring including social
equity which includes the community and the environment. She has been scoring WRIA 8 grant proposals
for over 7 years. Social equity is just as important as emergency access even though emergency access is
short term and needed. As the Waterfront Connector morphed, it became a transportation issue instead of
an emergency access issue. She suggested looking at the original matrix and adding social equity and
environmental impacts. She relayed her friends at WRIA 8 said the City should have engaged the
Department of Ecology and other environmental groups early in the process. She agreed with
Councilmembers Teitzel and Mesaros' suggestion to pause but she wanted to qualify and quantify the
matrix to include social equity. Obviously that was not excluded and resulted in the community outcry. She
recommended dealing with emergency access first. Trains and ferries are increasing, double tracks are
coming; it should be a WSDOT issue not a City of Edmonds issue.
Councilmember Johnson provided the following statement: "Edmonds has been working on access to the
west side of the railroad tracks since 2012. We have all been working in good faith. The first task force was
co-chaired by Mike Nelson and came up with a preferred alternative after considering 51 suggestions from
the community and expensive public engagement. The preferred alternative was the Waterfront Connector
at Edmonds Street. The City Council gave unanimous support for this project. The next task force was co-
chaired by Tom Mesaros and their job was to refine the bridge design. However, when it was brought back
to the Council, the Council divided in a 4-3 vote in support of the Waterfront Connector. Same people,
different time. Then something unexpected happened. There was an online tsunami of opposition to the
structure in a grassroots protest and the vote shifted. Mike Nelson moved that we should not allow the
Mayor to sign any agreement with the consultant for the Waterfront Connector.
Emotions were high that night but that motion precluded two important things. It robbed us of hearing the
public comments and it robbed us of a Council discussion. The democratic discussion of opinions and
options did not happen. My experts have told me that it is very unusual to have only a build alternative and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 19
Packet Pg. 24
4.2.a
a no build alternative in an environmental assessment. The Waterfront Connector was not only the preferred
alternative, it was the only alternative. I think it would have been better, in hindsight, to evaluate the top
three alternatives. Clearly people were concerned about impacts to the marine sanctuary and the beach.
Maybe they were right; maybe they were misled, but we won't know without the environmental assessment.
There is a proverb that states it is better to have a bird in the hand than two in the bush. By hoping for
something better, we ignore the four years of interagency work and numerous meetings and hundreds of
citizen participation. What we have given up is over $8.5 million from the state and port. I have been assured
by Senator Liias that the State will not help us review any more alternatives. They gave us the money to do
the Waterfront Connector, the community was behind it and at the last minute we pulled out. He said if we
want to look at any other alternatives, we have to do it on own dime. So what have we learned? We need
to all work together and not have a rush to judgment."
Council President Fraley-Monillas appreciated Councilmember Johnson's view on the Waterfront
Connector, but said it was not appropriate to hash backward although she understood Councilmember
Johnson had supported it from the beginning to the end. She relayed what she has heard Council say is there
are two issues, first a better way of connecting to citizens. She will bring a proposal to Council. It would
be appropriate for Councilmembers Teitzel and Mesaros with her as chair to participate in that effort. The
second issue is people are interested in a short term solution and looking at long term solutions after the
first of year. She offered to draft a proposal to look at short term solutions.
Councilmember Teitzel said it's very important when talking about the Waterfront Connector or any other
large project to understand what problem needs to be solved. He referred to Mr. Kimmelman's comments
that the Council may want to define the problem at the waterfront as a way to move people and vehicles
back and forth over the train tracks. That is a very different problem than solving emergency access to/from
the waterfront. He recommended carefully thinking about the problem and defining it well before attacking
it. The proper solution to accessing the waterfront may be a longer term solution that involves regular on
and off loading of ferries in addition to emergency vehicles, pedestrians, etc.
Councilmember Tibbott appreciated Council President Fraley-Monillas and Councilmembers Teitzel and
Mesaros' offer to devise a way forward and he was interested in what they develop. However, while that is
considered, he also supported having a refresher/review of the current emergency plans. The police and fire
departments may have an adequate response that works now and would be workable for 1-2 years.
Mayor Earling said as he noted in his recent column and has been mentioned several times on the dais, it is
time to step back from the Waterfront Connector issue. The City has been embroiled in it and clearly the
recent decision was in part political. During the next few months, any decisions will also look political and
cause additional controversy in the community. He recommended the Council put themselves in a position
to step away from that. There are Councilmembers running for Council and Mayor and several Council
candidates; staff is busy, yet he understands the need to have Councilmembers and candidates' questions
answered. He referred to an email he sent instituting a time limit of 15 minute for calls to staff for
question/answers and 15 minutes for any research requests related to the Waterfront Connector or
waterfront access. Staff has worked diligently on this issue for 2'/2 -3 years and they need to be able to step
away from it.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said the Council has been charged with looking at the communication
piece and short term emergency access. She understood Mayor Earling is the staff supervisor and keeper of
the information and projects. When she presents to Council she will include a budget proposal to hire
someone to assist the Council if staff is not able to do it.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 20
Packet Pg. 25
4.2.a
Councilmember Nelson expressed concern with comments about delaying discussions about emergency
access until after the election and that decisions were made for political reasons, finding that a disservice
to Councilmembers. He was confident the City Council can work collectively to put together short term
emergency solutions whether it is setting aside funds to purchase an emergency vehicle to park on the other
side of the tracks. That is not political, it is something the Council can and should do and should do sooner
rather than later.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said she spent time over the weekend in Marysville where the long trains
that go through Edmonds go down the middle of the road. She found it interesting to watch how Marysville
managed that. She also spent time this week in the San Juan Islands on a very small island that has ferry
service but no emergency services, no doctor, and no hospital. The residents on the island are well aware
there is some inherent risk should an emergency arise. There is a heliport on the island for taking people
off the island. She summarized there are ways to work through this and the situation is not as desperate as
she saw on the San Juan Islands. She was hopeful the Council could see a vision for moving forward and
getting information to citizens and getting feedback from citizens in a better manner than has occurred in
the last couple years.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling referred to concern in the community that the Waterfront Connector will be rebirthed. A
letter has been sent to the federal delegation and to the legislative delegation including the chairs of the
Transportation Committee in both the House and Senate advising that the recent Council vote reversed
course for the Waterfront Connector. There has also been contact with BNSF who were planning to bring
executives to Edmonds to consider a contribution to the Waterfront Connector that that was no longer
necessary. He distributed a letter the City received from the Port of Edmonds stating they were withdrawing
their $1.5M pledge for construction. He spoke with some members of the delegation, Councilmember
Johnson spoke with Senator Liias, and he spoke with Representative Peterson; all the delegation knows the
project is over. He assured $7.05M in state funds and $1.5M from the Port are gone and the project is dead.
Mayor Earling announced his appointment of Brooke Roberts as the alternate to the Youth Commission.
He wished everyone a happy and safe 4t' of July.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Mesaros distributed a memo describing the evaluation of City Attorney services. when the
Council renewed Lighthouse Law Group's contract last year, it was renewed for one year and then -Council
President Nelson asked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas and him to take the lead on preparing an
evaluation process. Since then Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was elected Council President and she
asked him to approach another Councilmember. He and Councilmember Teitzel will be working on a
process to evaluate the services of Lighthouse Law Group and evaluate whether to have an inhouse attorney
or an external firm. They will work on the process first and bring it to Council for approval. Once the
process is approved, they will implement it, complete it by the end of September and the Council can make
a decision in October regarding how to move forward.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Jim Landers, Edmonds Historical Museum, for providing the
information about the Native American carving that will be placed in front of the museum. The artist, Ty
Juvenil, has done story telling for the Burke Museum and the Seattle Library.
Councilmember Buckshnis announced a friend and former interpreter and her two children are visiting later
this week; she will be showing them the Pacific NW. She will be absent from the July 9t' Council meeting
and there will be a special Finance Committee meeting on July 16" before the City Council meeting.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 21
Packet Pg. 26
4.2.a
Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked Councilmember Mesaros for putting the proposal for evaluating
City Attorney services in writing. She has informed the Council's Legislative/Executive Assistant that she
will be assisting with that process. She announced the Council has a new Student Representative, Zach
Bauder, who lives in Edmonds and will be a senior at Lakeside School in the fall. He will begin attending
Council meetings next week.
Councilmember Teitzel announced his appointment of Jacob Sawyer, a student at Edmonds-Woodway
High School, to the Edmonds Youth Commission. He wished everyone happy and safe 4t' of July.
Councilmember Johnson reported she attended the AWC conference last week and found it very
informative, educational and timely. The conference included sessions on small cells and other topics. She
wished everyone a happy and safe 4' of July and good weather.
Councilmember Tibbott said he has reviewed the Housing Commission applications and was impressed
with the applicants' level of expertise. He was thankful for the diversity of owners and renters who will
bring a variety of viewpoints to the commission. He looked forward to conducting interviews in the next
couple of weeks. He wished everyone a happy 4th of July.
11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 2, 2019
Page 22
Packet Pg. 27
4.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #237512 through #237669 dated July 5, 2019 for $525,616.06, #237670
through #237744 dated July 11, 2019 for $265,810.84 and wire payment of $487.80.
Approval of payroll checks #63764 through #63790 dated June 25, 2019 for Kelly Day buy backs of
$33,286.22 and checks #63791 through #63803 dated July 1, 2019 for Uniform Allowance of $5,665.37
for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63804
through #63808 for $665,775.42, benefit checks #63809 - #63813 and wire payments of $672,121.65 for
the pay period June 16, 2019 through June 30, 2019.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 07-05-19
claims 07-11-19
wire 07-05-19
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 07-11-19
kelly day 06-25-19
uniform 07-01-19
payroll summary 07-05-19
payroll benefit 07-05-19
Packet Pg. 28
4.3.a
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237512 7/5/2019 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
237513 7/5/2019 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
237514 7/5/2019 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
75801
INV 75801 EDMONDS PD - STANLE'
2 BLAUER S/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
2 BLAUER PANTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
1 BLAUER L/S SHIRT
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
1 NAME TAPE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
75803
CREDIT FOR PANTS RETURNED F(
EXCHANGE GILGINAS PANTS
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
75804
INV 75804 EDMONDS PD - GILGINA
1 STRYKER PANT
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.70.24.00
Total
22391
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST COW
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST COW
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
Total
24142
TRAFFIC - OPTICOM DETECTORS
Traffic - Opticom Detectors
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
Total
Page: 1
aD
L
3
c
�a
.y
Amoun 0
a
aD
r
U
d
89.9E
N
169.9E
m
t
79.9c v
m
8.0(
34.8(
�a
0
L
-74.9£
a
-7.5( E
U
4-
74.9� 0
�a
7.5( o
382.7; a
Q
rn
138.0( c
138.0( c
E
1,410.0(
c
aD
138.1E E
1,548.1f
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 29
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 2
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
237515
7/5/2019
065568 ALLWATER INC
062419008
FINANCE DEPT WATER
0
m
Finance dept water
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
65.4,' u
10.4% Sales Tax
L
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
6.8(
062719084
WWTP: 6/28/19 DRINK WATER SER
DRINK WATER SERVICE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
t
25.8E u
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2.6� c
Total :
100.7< M
237516
7/5/2019
077093 ALQURISHI, HAMED
06-06-19
1 DAY JURY SERVICE 6-6-19 8Z068
1 day jury service 6-6-19 8Z0689431
0
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
13.4E j,
Total:
13.4f a
237517
7/5/2019
072799 ANDRES, KAREN
APRIL/MAY MILEAGE
APRIL/MAY RANGER CLASSROOM
APRIL/MAY RANGER CLASSROOM
U
001.000.64.571.23.43.00
127.0, c
Total:
127.0, 7a
237518
7/5/2019
076987 ANG, HUAY SIN
7730 ART CLASS
7730 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS-
0
a
7730 HAPPY KIDS PRESCHOOL AR
Q
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
596.7E
Total :
596.7E r'
237519
7/5/2019
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
1991303415
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
c
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
o
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
50.2,
10.4% Sales Tax
M
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
5.2'
1991313414
WWTP: UNIFORMS,TOWELS+MATT
Mats/Towels
0
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
47.8E t
Uniforms
U
�a
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 30
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237519 7/5/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
237520 7/5/2019 077151 ASHAGARI, FANAYE
237521 7/5/2019 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
2002169.009
1446604-I N
237522 7/5/2019 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON 7825 TAEKWON-DO
237523 7/5/2019 002100 BARNARD, EARL
237524 7/5/2019 076260 BELAIR, ROGER
67111
7865 7866 PICKLEBALL
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
Total :
REFUND: MEADOWDALE CLUBHOI
REFUND: MEADOWDALE CLUBHOI
001.000.239.200
Total
WWTP: 6/21/19 DIESEL FUEL
ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (include
423.000.76.535.80.32.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.32.00
Total
7825 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTION
7825 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
617.000.51.517.20.23.00
Total :
7865 7866 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INS'
7865 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRUC
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
7866 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRUC
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
Total
4.3.a
Page: 3
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 31
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
237525
7/5/2019
077094 BOUGH, GREGORY
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Tota I :
237526
7/5/2019
077142 BRIER TECHNICAL INC
11641
WWTP: HYPOCHLORATE TANK INS
HYPOCHLORATE TANK INSPECTIO
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
237527
7/5/2019
072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
7793 7796 YOGA
7793 7796 YOGA INSTRUCTION
7793 YOGA GENTLE WED INSTRUC
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7796 YOGATH W/ KERRY INSTRUC
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7807 7790 CLASSES
7807 7790 PILATES AND YOGA INS-
7807 PILATES INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7790 YOGA WED W/ KERRY INSTRI
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Tota I :
237528
7/5/2019
069295 BROWN, CANDY
7693 BIRD CLASS
7693 BIRD CLASS INSTRUCTION
7693 BACKYARD BIRDS CLASS INS
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
237529
7/5/2019
069306 CALDWELL, JEFF
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total
237530
7/5/2019
073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
20211725
COURT CANNON
COURT CANNON PRINTER
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
4.3.a
Page: 4
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
12.0E u
12.05 .L
N
m
1,785.51
1,785.5,
m
c
aD
381.1E
262.9(
�a
a
212.3E •�
U
646.8( c
1,503.Z
0
a
a
65.4.E Q
65.4E r'
0
ti
0
19.4(
19M
c
aD
147.9E t
U
co
Q
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 32
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237530
7/5/2019
073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
(Continued)
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
15.3�
Total:
163.3°
237531
7/5/2019
077095 CARR, CAMILLE
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
11.5-
Total :
11.51
237532
7/5/2019
069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
SRD0436
VEEAM BACKUP ANNUAL MAINTEN
Veeam Backup Essentials Annual Sol
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
1,179.3E
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
122.6E
Total :
1,302.01
237533
7/5/2019
003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
XC32588
WWTP: CARBON MONOXIDE/OXYT
nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide +
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
729.2,
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
75.81
Total :
805.0E
237534
7/5/2019
071358 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES
3582055
FLEET/SIGN SHOP - CLEANER
Fleet/Sign Shop - Cleaner
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
89.5(
Fleet/Sign Shop - Cleaner
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
89.5(
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00
9.3"
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
9.3-
Total :
197.6:
237535
7/5/2019
076615 CHRISTENSEN, KIERSTEN
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 33
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
237535
7/5/2019
076615 CHRISTENSEN, KIERSTEN
(Continued)
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Tota I :
237536
7/5/2019
077144 CIVIC ALCHEMY
1
PHYLLIS SHULMAN COUNCIL RETF
City Council Retreat Facilitation 6/7/1
001.000.11.511.60.41.00
Total
237537
7/5/2019
073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC
JUL-19
C/A CITYOFED00001
Jul-19 Fiber Optics Internet Connecti(
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
Tota I :
237538
7/5/2019
070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
8498310301175175
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH S�
CEMETERY INTERNET 820 15TH Sl
130.000.64.536.20.42.00
Tota I :
237539
7/5/2019
077096 CORDEL, AARON JAY
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total
237540
7/5/2019
067362 CRYSTAL, H. KENNETH
CRYSTAL 6/19 EXP. CL
JUNE 2019 EXPENSE CLAIM FOR E
UNIFORM BOOTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Total
237541
7/5/2019
077097 CURRIE, ANGELA MARIE
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Tota I :
237542
7/5/2019
077098 DAVIS, MELISSA
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
4.3.a
Page: 6
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
(D
10.7( -0
10.7( m
L_
T3
N
2,400.0(
2,400.0(
m
c
406.1(
406.1(
0
L
�a
138.6"
138.61 E
U
4-
0
12.0� >
12.W 0
a
a
Q
rn
253.9,
253.9 o
ti
0
E
12.6,
12.61
c
a�
E
t
10.3E +°
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 34
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237542 7/5/2019 077098 077098 DAVIS, MELISSA
237543 7/5/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
237544
237545
237546
237547
237548
237549
7/5/2019 063037 EARLING, DAVE
7/5/2019 074674 ECOLUBE RECOVERY LLC
7/5/2019 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued) Total
19-3941 6/25/19 SPECIAL MEETING & COUN
6/25/19 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MII
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Total
062519 AWC CONFERENCE
mileage reimbursement for travel to A
001.000.21.513.10.43.00
Total
3909061419 FLEET - OIL DISPOSAL
Fleet - Oil Disposal
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
1-96773
7/5/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7827 T ZAKHARY
7/5/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7774 T CORDOVA
7/5/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7753 L ZAKHARY
Total :
PM SUPPLIES: 4-IN1 BALL JOINT
PM SUPPLIES: 4-IN1 BALL JOINT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
7827 T ZAKHARY YOUTH SCHOLAF
7827 T ZAKHARY YOUTH SCHOLAF
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
Total
7774 T CORDOVA YOUTH SCHOLAI
7774 T CORDOVA YOUTH SCHOLAI
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
Total
7753 L ZAKHARY YOUTH SCHOLAF
4.3.a
Page: 7
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
10.3E 0
U
d
L_
500.5(
500.5( Y
m
343.3E m
343.3E a0i
c
�a
130.0( o
�a
13.3E a
141% E
U
4-
0
167.8( >
0
L
17.4E a
185.2.' Q
rn
0
75.0( c
75.0(
2
U
75.0( a0i
75.0( E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 35
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237549 7/5/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP (Continued)
237550
237551
237552
237553
7/5/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 7-05276
7/5/2019 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR138492
7/5/2019 077143 ENVIROISSUES INC
7/5/2019 076939 ESSENTRICALLY FIT LLC
AR 138494
165-007-000-1
7776 ESSENTRICS
PO # Description/Account
7753 L ZAKHARY YOUTH SCHOLAF
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
Total
CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820
CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
Total
COURT ELECTRONIC INVOICE
COURT ELECTRONIC INVOICE
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02
Maintenance for printers 06/21/19 -
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Total
ESJB.SERVICES THRU 5/31/19
ESJB.Services thru 5/31/19
421.000.74.594.34.65.41
ESJB.Services thru 5/31/19
423.000.75.594.35.65.41
ESJB.Services thru 5/31/19
422.000.72.594.31.65.41
Total
7776 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRUI
7776 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRU(
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
4.3.a
Page: 8
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
72.0( u
72.0( .L
N
m
206.5(
206.5(
m
c
a�
18.4�
1.91
�a
a
307.2( •�
U
31.9E c
359.5E
0
a
a
1,375.7, Q
rn
11375.7, c
ti
1,375.7<
4,127.11 E
U
c
385.0( E
385.0(
�a
Q
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 36
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237554 7/5/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH863167
237555 7/5/2019 071572 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS 146647A
237556 7/5/2019 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS
237557 7/5/2019 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
NFalk
WAMOU54294
WAMOU54481
PO # Description/Account
CITY ORDINANCE 4152 & 4153
CITY ORDINANCE 4152 & 4153
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
Total
INV 146647A CUST 21159 EDMOND
10- 1 OZ PLASTIC JARS
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
FIBERGLASS BRUSH - 12 PACK
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
MAGNETIC APPLICATOR
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
2" FINGERPRINT TAPE W/JAR
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
4" FINGERPRINT TAPE W/JAR
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
3M CLEAR 1 1/2" FINGERPRINT TAF
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
10- GRAY 6" PHOTO SCALES
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.80.31.00
Total
MILEAGE REIMB (TO SNO CO)
Reimb for mileage - trips to Sno Co fc
001.000.62.524.10.43.00
Total
WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
4.3.a
Page: 9
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
38.0' u
38.01 •`—
N
m
13.0(
85.0(
a�
77.5(
�a
50.0( o
L
90.0( a
E
40.0(
8.5( 0
20.4' o
384.4; a
Q
rn
41.9� c
41.95 ti
0
E
M
679.5z U
c
70.6 -, E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 37
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 10
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
237557
7/5/2019
066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
(Continued)
0
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
as
122.9z -0
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
m
12.7� .L
Total:
885.9'
N
237558
7/5/2019
065427 FCS GROUP
2964-21906005
EBJB.SERVICES THRU 6/21/19
m
EBJB.Services thru 6/21/19
421.000.74.534.80.41.10
3,030.1(
EBJB.Services thru 6/21/19
c
422.000.72.531.90.41.20
3,030.1( a
EBJB.Services thru 6/21/19
423.000.75.535.80.41.30
3,030.1 z
Total:
9,090.4( o
0
237559
7/5/2019
009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
0766003
WATER METER -#2027 M-METER-0:
ca
Water Meter -#2027 M-METER-02-01
a
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
3,160.5z •�
#2025 M-METER-01-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
331.0z c
Water Supplies
'70
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
110.9( p
10.4% Sales Tax
a
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
363.1 < Q
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
11.5<
0766003-1
WATER METER - #2025 M-METER-C
c
Water Meter - #2025 M-METER-01-0
rz.
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
331.0z N
10.4% Sales Tax
E
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
34.4( f°
0766003-2
WATER METER -#2025 M-METER-C
U
Water Meter -#2025 M-METER-01-0
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
331.0z E
Freight
U
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
17.2E
Q
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 38
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237559 7/5/2019 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued)
0766005
0778212
237560 7/5/2019 077150 FERNANDEZ, CHERYL 6/3/19 YOGA SUB
237561 7/5/2019 077141 FISCHER PLUMBING ENG20190284
237562 7/5/2019 075871 FLOW TECHNOLOGIES INC 1175
1176
PO # Description/Account
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
WATER METER - #2025 M-METER-1
Water Meter - #2025 M-METER-01-C
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
HYDRANT REPLACEMENTS
Hydrant Replacements
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
WATER METER #2027 M-METER-0,
Water Meter #2027 M-METER-02-01
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30
Total
6/3/2019 SUBSTITUTE YOGA INSTR
6/3/2019 SUBSTITUTE YOGA INSTR
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
FISCHER PLUMBING REFUND ENG
Fischer Plumbing Refund ENG20190
001.000.257.620
Total
SEWER - SANITARY SPOT REPAIR;
Sewer - Sanitary Spot Repairs
423.000.75.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.48.00
SEWER - LATERAL REPAIRS
4.3.a
Page: 11
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
36.2, u
662.0E
m
68.8E v
m
c
2,406.8,
c
250.3 -
0
L
4,740.8- a
E
493.01 .ii
13,349.0i ,u
0
Ta
0
L
78.1( a
78.1( Q
rn
0
235.0( r;
235.0( N
E
2
U
22,425.0(
aD
E
2,332.2(
�a
Q
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 39
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
237562
7/5/2019
075871 FLOW TECHNOLOGIES INC
(Continued)
Sewer - Lateral Repairs
423.000.75.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.48.00
Tota I :
237563
7/5/2019
011900 FRONTIER
425-771-0158
FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA}
FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA}
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
425-776-3896
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL,
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
425-776-6829
CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P
CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION A
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
509-022-0049
LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[
LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
Total
237564
7/5/2019
077099 GAMBOA, ROSEANNE
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total
237565
7/5/2019
071467 GATEWAY PET MEMORIAL
WA70014
WA70014 EDMONDS PD JUNE 201
PICK UP 8 ANIMAL REMAINS
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
Tota I :
237566
7/5/2019
073821 GEODESIGN INC
1906-020
E9CA.SERVICES THRU 5/24/19
E9CA.Services thru 5/24/19
112.000.68.542.61.41.00
E9CA.Services thru 5/24/19
125.000.68.542.30.41.00
4.3.a
Page: 12
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
400.0( u
L
41.6(
25,198.8(
m
z
v
138.8'
a�
138.&
0
138.& a
E
26.0 U
442.91 0
Ta
0
L
a
14.2� Q
rn
0
ti
103.0z
103.01 E
2
U
c
131.5- E
t
106.2 -
Q
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 40
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
237566
7/5/2019
073821 GEODESIGN INC
(Continued)
E9CA.Services thru 5/24/19
126.000.68.542.30.41.00
Tota I :
237567
7/5/2019
077145 GILES, BRADLEY
CPL partial refund
LATE RENEWAL REFUND EDMOND
CPL LATE FEE REFUND
001.000.322.90.000.00
CPL LATE FEE REFUND
001.000.237.190
CPL LATE FEE REFUND
001.000.322.90.000.00
CPL LATE FEE REFUND
001.000.237.190
Tota I :
237568
7/5/2019
068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA
7813 TAI CHI
7813 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION
7813 TAI CHI INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7816 7811 CLASS
7816 7811 QIGONG & TAI CHI INSTF
7816 QIGONG INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7811 TAI CHI LEVEL 2 CLASS INSTF
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Tota I :
237569
7/5/2019
012199 GRAINGER
9201994614
PM SUPPLIES: HOOKS, FLAT FREE
PM SUPPLIES: HOOKS, FLAT FREE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Tota I :
237570
7/5/2019
069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC
214875/1
WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
4.3.a
Page: 13
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 41
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237570 7/5/2019 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC (Continued)
237571
237572
237573
7/5/2019 012560 HACH COMPANY
7/5/2019 077100 HALBAKKEN, BRIAN
PO # Description/Account
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
214877/1 WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
Total :
11523124 WWTP: SWABS,PH STANDARD,NU'
SWABS,PH STANDARD, NUTRIENT;
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
06062019
7/5/2019 012845 HARBOR SQUARE ATHLETIC CLUB 2018 MEMBERSHIP
2019 MEMBERSHIP
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total :
2018 MEMBERSHIP EDMONDS PD
7 MEMBERSHPS @ $75 PER MON
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
2019 MEMBERSHIP EDMONDS PD
7 MEMBERSHPS @ $75 PER MON
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.41.00
Total
4.3.a
Page: 14
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
33.0, u
L_
13
1,361.0E
m
t
141.5`1 u
1,853.1; m
c
a�
1,437.4,
0
71.1(
�a
a
156.8E
1,665.41
0
Ta
13.2E c
13.2E
a
Q
rn
6,300.0( c
ti
648.9(
E
M
6,300.0(
c
655.2( E
13,904.1(
�a
Q
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 15
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun N
237574
7/5/2019
012900
HARRIS FORD INC
188287
UNIT 947 - PARTS
0
m
Unit 947 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
72.1 £ u
10.5% Sales Tax
L
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
7.5£
CM187444
FLEET CORE FEE REFUND
Y
Fleet Core Fee Refund
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
t
-40.0( u
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-4.2( c
Total :
35.51 M
237575
7/5/2019
010900
HD FOWLER CO INC
15102027
WATER - MAIN REPAIR SUPPLIES
Water - Main Repair Supplies
o
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
1,903.5(
10.4% Sales Tax
a
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
197.9E
15105140
WATER SUPPLIES
Water Supplies
U
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
35.5£ o
10.4% Sales Tax
Ta
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
3.7( o
Total:
2,140.7' a
Q
237576
7/5/2019
064528
HI -LINE ELECTRICAL
10708894
UNIT E162EQ - PARTS
Unit E162EQ - Parts
r'
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
107.2E c
10.4% Sales Tax
ti
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
11.1 f N
Total:
118.4( E
.ii
237577
7/5/2019
077140
HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES
BLD20190019
REFUND: PROJECT NOT STARTED
U
Permit fee refund: project not
c
001.000.257.620
67.2( E
BLD20190136
REFUND: PERMIT CANCELLED
Partial refund of permit fees. Project
Q
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 43
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 16
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237577
7/5/2019
077140
HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES
(Continued)
001.000.257.620
51.2(
Total:
118.4(
237578
7/5/2019
061013
HONEY BUCKET
0551117506
HUTT PARK HONEY BUCKET
HUTT PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
175.0(
Total :
175.0(
237579
7/5/2019
073548
INDOFF INCORPORATED
3253391
INDOFF INCORPORTATED SUPPLIE
COURT OFFICE SUPPLIES
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
607.0E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
63.1 <
3255525
COURT OFFICE SUPPLIES
COURT OFFICE SUPPLIES
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
7.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
0.8'
Tota I :
679.0(
237580
7/5/2019
014940
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
300-10058781
FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
468.6f
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
48.7z
300-10058801
FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
7.7,
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
0.8(
Total :
525.9z
237581
7/5/2019
077101
ISELI, VICTOR
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
12.7E
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237581 7/5/2019 077101 077101 ISELI, VICTOR
237582 7/5/2019 064934 JOHN BARKER LANDSCAPE
237583
237584
237585
237586
7/5/2019 077146 JOHNSON ROOFING & GUTTERS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
6/26/19 EBB TIDE
BLD20190774
7/5/2019 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300401912
7/5/2019 077102 KELSEY, RICHARD
7/5/2019 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER
06062019
7297 7298 SOCCER
7299 7300 SOCCER
7301 SOCCER
PO # Description/Account
Total
6/26/19 EBB TIDE WALKWAY DEPO
6/26/19 EBB TIDE WALKWAY DEPO
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
Total
REFUND: OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS
Refund: Address outside City Limits
001.000.257.620
Total
INV 300401912 ACCT 100828 EDM(
17 PURELL HAND SANITIZER
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
HANDLING FEE
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
Total
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total
7297 7298 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INS
7297 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER MOM/DA
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
7298 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER TOT SO(
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
7299 7300 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INS
7300 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER TECHNIC
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
7299 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER PRE -SO(
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
7301 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU(
4.3.a
Page: 17
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
12.71 0
U
d
L_
1,537.0(
1,537.0(
m
135.0( m
135.0( a0i
c
�a
39.9E o
�a
12.4- a
E
4.1E
56.51 c
Ta
0
CL
10.8-
10.81 Q
rn
0
633.6( c
546.4£ .
R
237.6( (D
E
t
792.0( U
Q
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 18
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237586
7/5/2019
071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER
(Continued)
7301 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER SKILLS F
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
158.4(
Total:
2,368.0f
237587
7/5/2019
077149 KIMBERLY & BENJAMIN UMAYAM
2-02100
#40230246-803-JH4 UTILITY REFUN
#40230246-803-JH4 Utility refund du(
411.000.233.000
238.1
Total :
238.1
237588
7/5/2019
077072 KINNO, ERIKA
7/2/2019
EAC: ON THE FENCE ARTWORK: P
EAC: ON THE FENCE ARTWORK: P
117.100.64.573.20.41.00
500.0(
Tota I :
500.0(
237589
7/5/2019
077103 KRUEGER, SUSAN
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
12.9(
Total:
12.9(
237590
7/5/2019
073950 KUBWATER RESOURCES
08747
WWTP: POLYMER
Polymer
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
11,372.2�
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
1,182.7,
Total:
12,555.01
237591
7/5/2019
016850 KUKER RANKEN INC
INV-051650
1/4 X 2" MAG NAILS 100/BOX
1/4x2" Mag Nails 100/box
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
17.2.
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
1.7�
Total :
19.0Z
237592
7/5/2019
074135 LAFAVE, CAROLYN
062119
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
mileage reimbursement for retirement
001.000.21.513.10.43.00
13.4E
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237592 7/5/2019 074135 LAFAVE, CAROLYN
237593 7/5/2019 076165 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
E9CA/E9CB.Pmt 1
237594 7/5/2019 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 169
237595 7/5/2019 077104 LEGG, MARIANNE
237596 7/5/2019 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER
170
06062019
80500270163
PO # Description/Account
mileage reimburesement for
ESCC t-:
138.100.21.557.21.49.00
Total
E9CA/E9CB.PMT 1 THRU 6/12/19
E9CA.Pmt 1 thru 6/12/19
112.000.68.542.30.48.00
E9CA.Pmt 1 thru 6/12/19
125.000.68.542.30.48.00
E9CA.Pmt 1 thru 6/12/19
126.000.68.542.30.48.00
E9CB.Pmt 1 thru 6/12/19
421.000.74.542.30.48.00
Total
9Z0279202
9z0279202 - STIMPSON-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
9Z0634110
9Z0634110 - HOGAN-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
Tota I :
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Tota I :
UNIT 14 - FLAT REPAIR
Unit 14 - Flat Repair
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
Total
4.3.a
Page: 19
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
7.0£ u
20.5E .L
N
m
82,371.7, v
66,522.4E
a�
74,335.4.E
�a
11,370.0( o
234,599.51 j,
M
a
E
300.0( U
4-
0
7a
300.0( p
600.0( a
a
Q
rn
14.5,
14.5, 9
0
E
M
29.0(
c
3.0, E
32.0: t
U
�a
Q
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 20
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237597
7/5/2019
077152
LIQUIDANO, ENRIQUE
2002176.009
REFUND: MEADOWDALE CLUBHOI
REFUND: MEADOWDALE CLUBHOI
001.000.239.200
450.0(
Tota I :
450.0(
237598
7/5/2019
077147
LORRAINE E BARBANO REV TRUST
8-48350
#40223887 UTILITY REFUND
#40223887 Utility refund
411.000.233.000
10.01
Total :
10.W
237599
7/5/2019
076001
LUCIE R BERNHEIM, ATTYAT LAW
27220
6Z0286695
6Z0286695 - ALESSI-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
27221
6Z0286697
6Z0286697 - ALESSI-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
27223
8Z0102422
8Z0102422 - GAUDINIER-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
410.0(
27224
9Z0267677
9Z0267677 - GAUDINIER-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
410.0(
27225
9Z0272075
9Z0272075 - JOHNSON-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
27226
8Z0579345
8Z0579345 - TROKEY-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
27227
9Z0220628
9Z0220628 - TROKEY-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
Total:
2,320.0(
237600
7/5/2019
074263
LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO
031849 00
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
154.1 £
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 21
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237600
7/5/2019
074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLYCO
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
16.0<
031849 01
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
17.6(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1.8:
Total :
189.6'
237601
7/5/2019
067235 MARYS TOWING INC
77842
INV 77842 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-
TOW BLUE CRWN VIC CS 19-1471,
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
189.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
19.6(
Tota I :
208.6E
237602
7/5/2019
077105 MATTHIESEN, LARS
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
11.5-
Total :
11.51
237603
7/5/2019
077106 MCKINNEY, SUSAN
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
10.4E
Total :
10.4E
237604
7/5/2019
020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
307118
STREET - NEW CHAIN SAW
Street - New Chain Saw
111.000.68.542.71.35.00
369.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.35.00
38.4
307275
PM SUPPLIES: AUTOCUT SPOOL, L
PM SUPPLIES: AUTOCUT SPOOL, L
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
46.9,
10.4% Sales Tax
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 22
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237604
7/5/2019
020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.8£
Tota I :
460.2,
237605
7/5/2019
077107 MILLIKEN,STACY
06062019
1 DAY JTR8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
19.6E
Total :
19.6:
237606
7/5/2019
077108 MIRCEA, ILDIKO
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
17.3"
Total :
17.31
237607
7/5/2019
076498 MOGLIA & LARRIPA LAW FIRM PLLC
10
MALOUF, MATTHEW
MALOUF, MATTHEW-
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
112.0(
Total:
112.0(
237608
7/5/2019
075266 MORGAN MECHANICAL INC
S19-3195
WWTP: ENV. MECHANICAL
SYSTEI
ENV. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SER`
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
1,435.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
149.2.E
Tota I :
1,584.2E
237609
7/5/2019
077109 MUELLER, NAOMI
06062019
1 DAY JTR8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
13.0,
Total :
13.0:
237610
7/5/2019
018950 NAPAAUTO PARTS
3276-829472
UNIT 95 - SUPPLIES
Unit 95 - Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
5.5E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0.5 1
3276-829568
UNIT 95 - PARTS
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 23
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
237610
7/5/2019
018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS
(Continued)
0
Unit 95 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
5.7� u
10.4% Sales Tax
L
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0.6(
3276-829594
UNIT 106 - PARTS
Unit 106 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
99.6" v
Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.2E c
3276-832819
UNIT 106 - PARTS
Unit 106 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
13.9<
10.4% Sales Tax
o
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
1.4E >+
3276-833449
FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES
a
Fleet Shop Supplies
E
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
6.3E .�
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
0.6 1 0
3276-834279
FLEET - PNEUMATIC BRAKE CALIP
>
Fleet - Pneumatic Brake Caliper Win(
0
L
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
182.9E a
10.5% Sales Tax
Q
511.000.77.548.68.35.00
19.2- rn
Total :
346.9<
0
237611
7/5/2019
068025 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION
110847475
WOTS LOGO PENS
ti
WOTS LOGO PENS
0
,n
123.000.64.573.20.49.00
194.4, .E
Sales Tax
U
123.000.64.573.20.49.00
20.1 };
Total:
214.61 y
E
237612
7/5/2019
075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING
10
WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PRi
U
Tasks 1 - 4: Parks Project Mgmt and
Q
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 24
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
237612
7/5/2019
075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING
(Continued)
125.000.64.576.80.41.00
1,562.5(
Task 5: Engineering Dept Tasks
422.000.72.594.31.65.41
625.0(
Total:
2,187.5(
237613
7/5/2019
070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
10197422
FSA FEES -JUNE
FSA FEES - JUNE
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
155.0(
Total :
155.0(
237614
7/5/2019
024001 NC MACHINERY
MVCR0045304
FLEET RETUND
Fleet Retund
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-29.2<
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-3.0z
MVCS0301881
UNIT 57 - PARTS
Unit 57 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
200.1(
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
13.9z
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
22.2(
Total :
204.W
237615
7/5/2019
063034 NCL
425164
WWTP: NITR INHIB REFILLS
NITR INHIB REFILLS
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
85.2(
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
12.0E
Total :
97.2°
237616
7/5/2019
024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
0680913-IN
FLEET RETURNS
Fleet Returns
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
-147.2z
10.3% Sales Tax
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237616 7/5/2019 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued)
0699614-IN
0701031-IN
0701286-IN
690071 R-DM
237617 7/5/2019 077110 NICHOLS, PIERCE 06062019
237618 7/5/2019 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S9409081.001
PO #
Description/Account
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
FLEET FILTER INVENTORY
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
UNIT 66 - SUPPLIES
Unit 66 - Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
FLEET FILTER INVENTORY
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
FLEET FILTER INVENTORY
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total :
Total ;
WWTP: MOMENTARY PUSH B BUT -
MOMENTARY PUSH B BUTTON&EN
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
4.3.a
Page: 25
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
m
15.1; 'D
U
d
65.6"
N
6.8,
194.1.` c
a�
20.1
�a
0
53.0( `>,
M
a
5.5,
U
45 19.31 0
Ta
2.0( o
204.2E a
Q
rn
12.5E c
12.5E c
E
369.5E
c
a�
38.4< E
407.95 U
Q
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
237619
7/5/2019
025690 NOYES, KARIN
000 00 923
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 6.19.2
Planning Board Minutes (6.26.19)
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
Tota I :
237620
7/5/2019
067868 NW TANK & ENVIRONMENTAL
78421
FLEET TANK CERTIFICATIONS
Fleet Tank Certifications
511.000.77.548.68.49.00
Total
237621
7/5/2019
076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA
64592374
HEB B VACCINE
HEP B VACCINE - POLICE
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Tota I :
237622
7/5/2019
065720 OFFICE DEPOT
329749679001
PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES
PW - Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
33260579001
INV 33260579001 ACCT 90520437
12 PACK 5 X 8 NOTE PAD
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
12 PACK POST -IT NOTES 1-1/2 X 2
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
12 PACK POST- IT NOTES 3 X 5
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
Tota I :
237623
7/5/2019
077111 OLSON, MALI
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total
4.3.a
Page: 26
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237624 7/5/2019 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
237625 7/5/2019 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
3685-412543
FLEET PARTS
Fleet Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
3685-412692
FLEET PARTS
Fleet Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
3685-413167
FLEET RETURNS
Fleet Returns
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
3685-414785
UNIT 49 - PARTS
Unit 49 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
3685-415051
UNIT 14 - PARTS
Unit 14 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
00093822
UNIT 106 - FOOTAGE
COUNTER
Unit 106 - Footage Counter
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
4.3.a
Page: 27
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
134.6,1 u
L
14.0(
N
m
7.4- v
0.7£ c
a�
c
136.7(
0
-14.3£ >+
M
a
E
9.2£ 'ca
0.91 0
7a
0
L
40.41 a
Q
4.2- rn
60.7,
0
r`
0
524.4- .
R
U
15.5 ,
c
aD
56.1( t
596.1 ' u
Q
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237626 7/5/2019 069873 PAPE MACHINERY INC
237627
237628
237629
237630
237631
7/5/2019 076815 PARKS, KIMBERLY
7/5/2019 075183 PETERSON FRUIT CO
7/5/2019 008475 PETTY CASH
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
11519815 UNIT 100 - PARTS
Unit 100 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total :
7807 PILATES 7807 PILATES CLASS INSTRUCTIOI
7807 PILATES CLASS INSTRUCTIOI
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
393798 FRUIT PICKUP
MONTHLY FRUIT PICKUP
001.000.22.518.10.31.10
393818 FRUIT PICKUP - ADD'L
FUJI APPLES (MISSED ON LAST IN'
001.000.22.518.10.31.10
Total
070219 CITY - WASHINGTON DC BUSINES:
CITY - WASHINGTON DC BUSINES:
001.000.65.518.20.43.00
SEWER - PARTS FOR JETTER
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
Total
7/5/2019 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 2019-0361
7/5/2019 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 19-037S
SUBSCRIPTION FEES - Q2
Q2 (APRIL-JUNE) SUBSCRIPTION
001.000.22.521.10.41.00
Total
Q3-2019 CLEAN AIR ASSESSMENT
03-19 Clean Air Assessment per RC\
4.3.a
Page: 28
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
87.0- u
16.9�
N
10.8,
114.8, u
m
c
d
81.6(
81.6(
0
�a
a
94.3E
U
25.7E c
120.1( 0
0
a
a
44.01 Q
rn
25.3E
69.4' 9
0
E
786.0(
786.0(
aD
E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237631 7/5/2019 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY (Continued)
237632 7/5/2019 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
200000704821
200002411383
200002411383
200007876143
200009595790
200011439656
200016558856
200016815843
200017676343
200019375639
200019895354
PO # Description/Account
001.000.39.553.70.41.50
Total :
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / �
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / �
4.3.a
Page: 29
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
m
9,153.2,' 'D
9,153.2E m
L_
N
681.1 ,
v
1,362.6� c
d
M
1,420.9E
0
60.4, a
E
174.5E U
4-
0
Ta
51.01 c
L
a
a
Q
100.1 Z
rn
0
168.1( rZ.
0
E
99.3E f°
U
c
aD
70.7, E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237632 7/5/2019 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued)
200020415911
200021829581
200024711901
237633 7/5/2019 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 1906059
237634 7/5/2019 077112 RIDLEY, NICOLE 06062019
237635 7/5/2019 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-023329
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
WWTP: 5/21-6/20/19 METER 00039(
5/21-6/20/19 200 2ND AVE S / METI
423.000.76.535.80.47.63
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
Total
EDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVE
EDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVE
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
Total
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
UNIT 285 - BATTERY
Unit 285 - Battery
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
4.3.a
Page: 30
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
46.9E 'D
r
U
d
L
6.3E 13
N
24.1E
t
U
24.1 E
m
c
24.1 E M
c
24.1 E
0
24.1 E >+
M
a
E
42.11 'ca
0
58.0, >
4,461% o
a
a
Q
rn
6, 612.4E
6,612.4F c
ti
0
E
10.9< 2
10.9:
c
a�
E
t
U
96.9(
Q
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
237635
7/5/2019
064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Tota I :
237636
7/5/2019
065001 SCHIRMAN, RON
49
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.29.00
Total
237637
7/5/2019
076328 SCJ ALLIANCE
56814
E6AA.SERVICES THRU 5/3/19
E6AA.Services thru 5/3/19
112.000.68.595.33.65.41
Tota I :
237638
7/5/2019
077113 SELLERS, JENNIFER
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Tota I :
237639
7/5/2019
036041 SETINA MFG CO
185580
UNIT 436 - PARTS
Unit 436 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Tota I :
237640
7/5/2019
077114 SMITH ANDERSON, LEANNE
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Total
237641
7/5/2019
077115 SMITH, SARAH
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
Tota I :
4.3.a
Page: 31
W
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
10.Of U
107.01 •L
N
m
9,610.0(
9,610.0(
m
c
a�
1,235.1(
1,235.1( o
0
�a
a
14.61 .E
14.6'
0
�a
1,403.0( a
a
145.9, Q
1,548.9, cn
0
ti
0
11.2E N
11.21 •E
R
U
c
a�
19.2E E
19.2f U
�a
Q
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 59
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237642 7/5/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
200124873
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
200386456
CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE
CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
200422418
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
200748606
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
200943348
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201192226
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201265980
LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL �
LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL �
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
201374964
LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P
LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
201557303
CEMETERY BUILDING
CEMETERY BUILDING
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
201563434
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WA
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201582152
TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
201594488
LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S
LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
4.3.a
Page: 32
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
37.21 u
54.7, 19
m
t
1,108.7E
m
c
a�
17.11
�a
0
29.8E `5%
M
a
E
19.1E 'i
0
147.7E
0
L
Q
a
19.5< Q
rn
64.0( o
ti
0
28.51 .E
ca
U
31.7� y
E
z
U
M
19.3E Q
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237642 7/5/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
201610276
OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT
OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
201611951
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
201656907
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN!
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN!
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
201703758
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10(
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 10(
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201762101
415 5TH AVE S
415 5TH AVE S
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
201782646
TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / �
TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / �
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201907862
TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW
TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
202087870
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
202161535
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
CEMETERY WELL PUMP
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
202289120
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
202421582
LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI
LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
202620415
MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA
MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA
4.3.a
Page: 33
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
9.1E
N
34.8E
106.0E c
d
M
28.7,
0
L
20.0, a
E
18.3, u
4-
0
7a
33.81 o
a
a
Q
160.4E
0
211.6 c
E
58.5E u
c
aD
51.7< E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237642 7/5/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued)
204292213
204467435
220547582
237643 7/5/2019 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2019-5299
2019-5299 CM
237644 7/5/2019 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 1603
237645 7/5/2019 038100 SNO-KING STAMP
PO # Description/Account
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA
HAZEL MILLER PLAZA
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
Total
INV 2019-5299 MAY 2019 INMATE M
INMATE MEDS - MAY 2019
001.000.39.523.60.31.00
2019-5299 CM - CREDIT APR INMAT
CREDIT FOR APR 2019 INMATE ME
001.000.39.523.60.31.00
Total
JUL-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATCI
JUL-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATCI
001.000.39.528.00.41.50
JUL-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATCI
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
JUL-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATCI
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
Total
65693 INV 65693 EDMONDS PD
5 LOCKER MAGNETS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10 MAILBOX TAGS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
Freight
4.3.a
Page: 34
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
16.6( 'D
r
U
d
57.4� 13
N
m
41.5E U
m
c
44.6 1 M'
2,471.7E
�a
0
175.5E a
E
-13.5z U
162.0' c
Ta
0
a
70,111.5( Q
1,845.0,
0
1,845.0z ti
73,801.51 N
E
22.5(
W
E
35.0(
�a
Q
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 35
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
237645
7/5/2019
038100 SNO-KING STAMP
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
3.5(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
6.31
Total:
67.3'
237646
7/5/2019
038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103583
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
689.5,
103585
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70(
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
724.4,
103586
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
605.1 £
103588
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
459.8�
Total :
2,479.0E
237647
7/5/2019
077116 SQUIRES, SEAN
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
12.5E
Total :
12.5E
237648
7/5/2019
076054 STRUM, KRAIG
STRUM 06/19 EX CL
EXPENSE CLAIM SHELTON PER DI
PER DIEM SHELTON 6/26-6/28/19
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
110.5(
Total:
110.5(
237649
7/5/2019
077153 SWARTZ, SIERRA
SWARTZ 06/19 EX CL
EXPENSE CLAIM FOR PORTLAND I
RT MILEAGE - EDMONDS-PORTLAI`
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
227.3E
Total:
227.3E
237650
7/5/2019
038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
US53323
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HP
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HP
Page: 35
Packet Pg. 63
4.3.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 36
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
237650
7/5/2019
038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
(Continued)
0
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
as
1,416.9E -0
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
m
147.3, .L
Total:
1,564.3E N
237651
7/5/2019
077117 TO, HUNG YAT
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
m
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
12.5E
Total:
12.5E c
237652
7/5/2019
077118 TSEDEVSUREN, RYAN
06062019
1 DAY JTR8Z0689431
M
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
14.5, _
Total :
14.5:
�a
237653
7/5/2019
063939 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
045-266961
PROJECT ACCT MODULE TRAININ(
a
EDEN Project Accounting Module
Tra
E
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
5,849.7E 2
Total:
5,849.7E c
237654
7/5/2019
077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER
79106
STORM - DUMP FEES
fd
Storm - Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00
768.0( a
Total:
768.0( Q
rn
237655
7/5/2019
077119 VANESS, MARY
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
0
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
19.7z c
Total:
19.7z u)
E
237656
7/5/2019
077120 VELTKAMP, PAUL
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
R
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
19.2E y
Total:
19.2f E
t
237657
7/5/2019
067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
9832647545
C/A 571242650-0001
U
Q
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237657 7/5/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bld Dept
001.000.62.524.20.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Econ
001.000.61.557.20.42.00
iPad Cell Service Council
001.000.11.511.60.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Developmer
001.000.62.524.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering
001.000.67.518.21.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance
001.000.31.514.23.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR
001.000.22.518.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor's Offi
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Dept
001.000.64.571.21.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Police Dept
001.000.41.521.22.42.00
Air cards Police Dept
001.000.41.521.22.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning DE
001.000.62.558.60.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
4.3.a
Page: 37
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
504.7,' u
76.8"
N
97.1E
U
561.5:
m
c
76.8- m
c
154.2E f°
0
L
1,275.5'
a
248.2< E
107.1E ,-
0
97.1E >
0
L
388.2E a
Q
57.1 z rn
57.1 z 9
0
1,960.9<
M
1,120.2E
c
120.0< E
t
26.8E
Q
Page: 37
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237657 7/5/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Street C
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Fleet
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/,r
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/;
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer Dept
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
iPad Cell Service Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
iPad Cell Service Street/Storm
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
iPad Cell Service Street/Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks
001.000.64.571.21.42.00
iPad Cell Service Parks Discovery
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
4.3.a
Page: 38
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
7.6f u
L
26.8E
N
7.6E
U
7.6E
(D
c
231 M m
c
61.5E f°
0
L
165.7'
a
165. T
324.0" ,-
0
381.1E >
0
L
156.8' a
Q
200.0E 0)
200.0E 9
0
646.8E
154.2�
c
97.1E E
t
40.0-
Q
Page: 38
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237657 7/5/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued)
9832777568
237658 7/5/2019 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 201132799
237659 7/5/2019 077148 WALLACE & REBECCA JOHNSON 2-32785
237660 7/5/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
237661 7/5/2019 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS
237662 7/5/2019 075283 WAVE
63018
63057
119-442
8136 50 211 00055035
PO # Description/Account
C/A 772540262-00001
Lift Station access
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
Total :
INV 201132799 CUST 23104-001 ED
OC SPRAY INST. - GAGNER 2079-1
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
Total
#753437RT UTILITY REFUND
#753437RT Utility refund due to
411.000.233.000
Total
INV 63018 EDMONDS PD CASE 19
TOW SUBURBAN CASE 19-15399
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
INV 63057 EDMONDS PD
TOW CASE 18-31298
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
Total
PM: TREE REMOVAL: FRANCES AN
PM: TREE REMOVAL SERVICE: FRf
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
Total
FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF
4.3.a
Page: 39
Page: 39
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 40
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237662
7/5/2019
075283 WAVE
(Continued)
High Speed Internet service 07/01/19
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
816.0(
Total:
816.0(
237663
7/5/2019
073552 WELCO SALES LLC
7672
INV 7672 EDMONDS PD
250 B/C COMPTON & MITSUI
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
41.7(
500 B/CARVAN, BOWER & HARDW
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
62.5E
NEW BUSINESS CARD SET UP
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
15.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
12.4(
Total:
131.6E
237664
7/5/2019
075743 WHISTLE WORKWEAR OF SHORELINE
SHO3515
WWTP: EDUENAS/JCLAY/SLONG-S
EDUENAS/JCLAY/SLONG-SCOTT
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
521.9z
10.2% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
53.2z
Tota I :
575.1 f
237665
7/5/2019
076794 WILLIAMS, CHARLOTTE ANN
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
11.2E
Total:
11.2f
237666
7/5/2019
064213 WSSUA TREASURER
621
MENS & COED SOFTBALL LEAGE l
MENS & COED SOFTBALL LEAGE l
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
4,340.0(
Total :
4,340.0(
237667
7/5/2019
077121 YOUNG, MICHAEL
06062019
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
11.7z
Page: 40
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:43:18AM
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237667 7/5/2019 077121 077121 YOUNG, MICHAEL
237668 7/5/2019 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC
237669 7/5/2019 077122 ZOLOTH, AMY
158 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
158 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 41
Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N
0
(Continued) Total :
11.71 0
19-EDM0006 JUN-19 RETAINER
Monthly Retainer
001.000.36.515.33.41.00
23,870.1(
Total :
23,870.1(
06062019 1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
z
1 DAY JTR 8Z0689431
v
001.000.23.512.50.49.20
11.5" m
Total: 11.51 cc)
M
Bank total : 525,616.0E
�a
Total vouchers : 525,616.0E o
�a
a
E
U
4-
0
El
Page: 41
Packet Pg. 69
4.3.b
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237670 7/11/2019 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
237671
237672
237673
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
75802
75805
FLOW
7/11/2019 072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 7568186
7/11/2019 075197 AGREEMENT DYNAMICS INC
7/11/2019 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC
5437
20018
PO # Description/Account
INV 75802 EDMONDS PD - L DANIEI
UNIFORM CAP W/SILVER BAND-DA
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
INV 75805 EDMONDS PD - R. ALLEI
2 ALERT PANTS R. ALLEN
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
INV 76016 EDMONDS PD - MITSUI
JACKET ZIPPER REPAIR- MITSUI
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Total
STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 7/1/201
STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 7/1/201
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Total
INV 5437 EDMONDS PD
6/5/19 MEETING
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
6/12/19 FACILITATED CONVERSATI,
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
6/27/19 FACILITATED CONVERSATI,
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
Total
WWTP: 6/11/19 COURIER P/U TO R.
6/11/19 COURIER P/U TO RAINIER E
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
Page: 1
aD
L
3
c
.y
Amoun 0
a
m
U
m
114.9E :a
N
11.5(
m
v
149.9E m
c
15.0( M
c
�a
6.0( o
L
�a
0.6(
298.W
U
4-
0
123.1E >
123.11 o
a
a
El
500.0(
500.0( rZ-
0
500.0( E
1,500.0( 2
c
a�
E
77.9( U
�a
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 70
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237673 7/11/2019 074488 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC
237674 7/11/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
Total
1991199344
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1991203640
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
1991303416
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
4.3.b
Page: 2
Amoun 1
77.9(
1.6- -0
N
6.1-
6.1-
c
6.1-
6.1-
0
6.0,
�a
a
0.6z U
4-
0
0.6z >
0
L
0.6z a
Q
0.6z rn
0.6"
r`
0
31.4; .E
R
U
3.2,
aD
E
t
31.4,
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 71
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.b
Page: 3
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
237674 7/11/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued)
0
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
3.21 U
1991309086
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
L
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6-
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1- u
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1- c
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1-
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1- o
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
`>+
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
�a
6.0£
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1, .�
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6, 0
10.4% Sales Tax
>
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6, o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6z Q
10.4% Sales Tax
c)
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.6" o
1991309087
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
V)
E
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
9.2�
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
19.1( E
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
0.9 1
Q
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 72
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.b
Page: 4
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
237674 7/11/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued)
0
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.9£ U
1991313415
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
L
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
50.2, 19
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
t
5.2; v
1991319016
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
6.1'
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
0
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
6.1' `>+
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
a
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
6.1
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
ca
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
6.1- u
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
0
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
6.0£
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
0.1 , a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
0.6z cn
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
0.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
o
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
0.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
M
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
0.6z
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
0.6' 0
1991319017
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
Q
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 73
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237674 7/11/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
237675 7/11/2019 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
Total
109114 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
109268 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
4.3.b
Page: 5
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
9.2� 'D
r
U
d
19.1(
13
0.91 Y
m
z
1.9E U
294.0E Zpt
m
c
a�
113.3,
0
113.3,
�a
a
116.7E
337.1( U
4-
0
337.1(
0
L
11.4z a
Q
11.4z rn
11.8(
ti
0
157.0- .
R
157.0 -
a�
161.7E E
U
�a
Q
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 74
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237675 7/11/2019 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
109319
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
109418
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
4.3.b
Page: 6
W
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
467.5E 'D
U
d
467.5E
15.8E
m
t
15.8E u
16.3z c
a�
c
111.5f
0
111.5E >+
M
a
114.9-,
331.0, u
0
331.0,
0
L
11.21 a
Q
11.2, c�
11.6"
0
28.1 E 9
28.1 E
29.0< t
U
co
Q
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 75
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237675 7/11/2019 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
Total
237676 7/11/2019 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 60787
ROUGH BOX - RATH
ROUGH BOX - RATH
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
Total
237677 7/11/2019 073834 BATTERIES PLUS P15852274
WWTP: CUSTOM BATTERY PCK 3
CUSTOM BATTERY PCK 3 CELL - pi
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Tota I :
237678 7/11/2019 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT 06302019 Core Creati
CREDIT FOR TOURISM BROCHURE
Credit for tourism brochure error
120.000.31.575.42.41.00
06302019 Core Creati
DESIGN AND PRINTING FOR DIVEF
Design and graphics for Diversity
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
Printing for Diversity Commission "I A
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
Total
4.3.b
Page: 7
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
aD
109.5( 'D
r
U
d
109.5(
2.8E
m
t
2.8E u
4
2.9< c
3,858.6:
c
�a
0
543.0(
543.0( a
E
U
124.7E c
Ta
12.2< p
136.9E a
a
Q
rn
-150.0(
ti
0
130.0( E
175.0(
c
18.2( E
173.2(
�a
Q
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 76
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.b
Page: 8
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun N
237679
7/11/2019 077046 BLUE DOT MARKETING CO
1216
SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF
0
m
SENIOR LEAGUE SOFTBALL UMPIF
001.000.64.571.25.41.00
952.0( u
Total:
952.0( .`
237680
7/11/2019 077156 BLUEBEAM INC
377579
BLUEBEAM LICENSE & ANNUAL Mi
N
Bluebeam Revu: Standard End User
m
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
174.5,
Bluebeam Revu: Standard End User
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
290.7E
Bluebeam Revu: Standard End User
°'
422.000.72.531.40.49.00
290.8E c
Bluebeam Revu: Standard End User
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
290.8E o
Bluebeam Revu: Standard Annual
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
37.1 < a
Bluebeam Revu: Standard Annual
E
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
61.8E 'ji
Bluebeam Revu: Standard Annual
422.000.72.531.40.49.00
61.8E 0
Bluebeam Revu: Standard Annual
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
61.9( o
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
22.0' Q
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
36.6,
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.49.00
36.6E c
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
36.7( •�
Total :
1,401.81 U
237681
7/11/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
RN06191007
WWTP: CYLINDER RENTAL+HAZM)
a�
nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
147.9( U
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 77
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237681 7/11/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued)
237682 7/11/2019 022200 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 3558
237683 7/11/2019 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310301175191
237684 7/11/2019 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING JUNE 2019
237685 7/11/2019 075925 CROSSROADS STRATEGIES LLC 1014265
237686 7/11/2019 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
237687 7/11/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
237688 7/11/2019 076172 DK SYSTEMS
55037
19-3943
23493
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total :
POSTAGE FOR EDMONDS HALF Of
POSTAGE FOR EDMONDS HALF Of
001.000.64.571.22.42.00
Total
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEF
001.000.64.571.29.42.00
Total
ACCT 613589 EDMONDS PD JUNE
JUNE 2019 DRY CLEANING CHARG
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Total
FEDERAL LOBBYIST FOR JUNE 20-
Federal lobbyist for June 2019
001.000.61.511.70.41.00
Total
BUSINESS RECRUITMENT AD JUNI
Business recruitment ads in June Dai
001.000.61.558.70.41.40
Total
7/2/2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7/2/2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING N
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Total
CITY HALL - REFRIGERANT SERVI(
CITY HALL - REFRIGERANT SERVI(
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
4.3.b
Page: 9
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 78
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237688 7/11/2019 076172 DK SYSTEMS
237689 7/11/2019 007253 DUNN LUMBER
237690 7/11/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Tota I :
6445222
PM: SUPPLIES ACCT E000027
PM: SUPPLIES: EYE BOLT, FASTEN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.2% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
6462209
PM: SUPPLIES ACCT E000027
PM: SUPPLIES: LUMBER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Tota I :
1388
PM SUPPLIES: ADAPTORS, HOSE
PM SUPPLIES: ADAPTORS, HOSE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1389
PM SUPPLIES: TUBING
PM SUPPLIES: TUBING
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1391
PM SUPPLIES: STORAGE CONTAIN
PM SUPPLIES: STORAGE CONTAIN
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
1395
PM SUPPLIES: SLUG BAIT
PM SUPPLIES: SLUG BAIT
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
4.3.b
Page: 10
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
45.8- u
486.31 •`—
N
m
17.7E v
1.8-
63.2(
0
6.6z
89.41 a
E
U
22.5z c
Ta
2.3z o
L
a
a
Q
rn
0.6(
ti
0
50.7E E
5.2£ U
c
aD
E
36.9� u
�a
Q
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 79
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
237690
7/11/2019
076610
EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
1396
PM SUPPLIES: ANT & ROACH KILL[
PM SUPPLIES: ANT & ROACH KILL[
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
1399
PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE
PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Tota I :
237691
7/11/2019
008812
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
AR138773
INV AR138773 ACCT MK5031 EDMC
B/W COPIES RZJ01403
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
Total
237692
7/11/2019
009350
EVERETT DAILY HERALD
EDH862813
LEGAL AD: PLN20060115
PLN20060115 HPC HRG
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
Total
237693
7/11/2019
066378
FASTENAL COMPANY
WAMOU54702
WWTP: SS LATCHES
SS LATCHES
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
237694
7/11/2019
071998
FOSTER, KELSEY
BID-8382
BID/ED! COPYWRITING FOR JUNE
BID/Ed! Copywriting for June articles
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
4.3.b
Page: 11
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 80
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
237694
7/11/2019
071998 071998 FOSTER, KELSEY
(Continued)
237695
7/11/2019
011900 FRONTIER
206-188-0247
253-003-6887
253-012-9189
425-771-5553
425-774-1031
425-776-1281
425-776-2742
425-776-5316
237696
7/11/2019
076542 GRANICUS
114589
PO # Description/Account
Total ;
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A,
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACC[
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
WWTP: 6/25-7/24/19 AUTO DIALER
6/25-7/24/19 AUTO DIALER - 1 VOI
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
WWTP: 6/25-7/24/19 AUTO DIALER:
6/25-7/24/19 AUTO DIALER - 1 BUr
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACC[
LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRA[
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH(
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH(
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCI
LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACC
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
Total
LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGE
LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGE
001.000.25.514.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.48.00
4.3.b
Page: 12
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
600.0( 0
U
d
L_
270.8E
N
270.8E y
42.1 f c
d
41.5E
0
123.5( a
E
47.5( U
4-
0
7a
59.2 - c
L
a
a
Q
rn
109.3( rZ.
991.4, N
E
1,417.5" c
aD
E
147.4'
�a
Q
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 81
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237696 7/11/2019 076542 076542 GRANICUS (Continued)
237697 7/11/2019 012560 HACH COMPANY 11524545
imlICYA3:T:1
237698 7/11/2019 076333 HASA INC 644979
237699 7/11/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 8081947
"I:3'liR1[:i
237700 7/11/2019 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-0030
PO # Description/Account
Total
WWTP: PH PAPER
PH PAPER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: STERILE BAG W/TIOSULFA
STERILE BAG W/TIOSULFATE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
WWTP: SOD. HYPOCHLORITE
SOD. HYPOCHLORITE
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
Total
WWTP: CLR, LIQ LAUNDRY SOAP,
CLR, LIQ LAUNDRY SOAP, SHEETII
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.2% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: POLY TUBE
POLY TUBE- picked up at Shoreline
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.2% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER JUN
BID/Ed! Program manager for June 2
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
4.3.b
Page: 13
W
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
1,564.9' 0
U
d
L
49.9E
N
5.2(
36.3E c
d
3.7E -0
95.2f
0
�a
a
1,817.1,
188.9E
2,006.1( c
Ta
0
a
453.7' Q
46.2E
ti
4.1(
E
0.42
504.55
c
a�
E
t
2,866.5(
Q
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 82
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237700 7/11/2019 075966 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE
237701 7/11/2019 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG
237702 7/11/2019 074084 LOADMAN NW LLC
237703 7/11/2019 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued) Total
BID-JUNE2019 BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY JUNE 201!
BID/Ed! photography for June 2019
140.000.61.558.70.41.00
Total
15261 UNIT #14 - REPAIRS
Unit 14 - Repairs
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.48.00
5011191
237704 7/11/2019 072886 MACDONALD-MILLER FAC.SOLUTIONS SVC158421
SVC158962
237705 7/11/2019 077154 MEDTECH FORENSICS INC 31539
Total :
PM SUPPLIES: NOZZLE & CAP O-R
PM SUPPLIES: NOZZLE & CAP O-R
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
PM: YOST POOL LABOR FOR SHOV
YOST POOL LABOR FOR SHOWER
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
PM: YOST POOL BOILER REPAIRS
PM: YOST POOL BOILER REPAIRS
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
Total
INV 31539 EDMONDS PD
DRAG SLED
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
4.3.b
Page: 14
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
2,866.5( 0
U
d
L_
600.0(
600.0(
m
v
685.0( m
c
71.21 -a
756.2'
0
L
�a
12.8, a
E
1.3z
14.1f o
Ta
0
857.5( a
Q
89.1 f c�
9,326.3� o
969.9z
11,243.01
c
a�
E
t
385.0( U
Q
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 83
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.b
Page: 15
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237705
7/11/2019
077154 MEDTECH FORENSICS INC
(Continued)
PELOUZE SCALE
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
53.0(
Freight
001.000.41.521.71.35.00
75.0(
Total:
513.0(
237706
7/11/2019
067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS
5420463
PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS
PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
492.4E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
51.2,
Tota I :
543.7(
237707
7/11/2019
025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS
N013949
WWTP: HOSE ASSYS
Hose Assys - Picked up at Store.
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
84.3(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
8.2E
Total :
92.5E
237708
7/11/2019
025690 NOYES, KARIN
000 00 925
ADB MINUTES
ADB Minutes (Mtg: 7.3.19)
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
407.0(
Total :
407.0(
237709
7/11/2019
065720 OFFICE DEPOT
333753748001
PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES
PW - Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
15.4E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
1.6
Total :
17.0j
237710
7/11/2019
070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
June, 2019
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANS
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
001.000.237.120
792.2-
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 84
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237710 7/11/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued)
237711 7/11/2019 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130
0001520
0001530
0002930
0021400
PO # Description/Account
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.237.130
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.237.330
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.237.200
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.237.250
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis
001.000.237.170
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
Total
PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S1
PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST S\
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW
CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH
CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH
130.000.64.536.50.47.00
SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104
SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI
4.3.b
Page: 16
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
m
17,209.1- u
521.0(
N
58.3,
v
4, 081.1-
c
169.4( m
c
1,583.3� f°
0
L
314.9z
a
241.4z
1.8( ,-
0
331.& >
25,304.5: a
a
Q
rn
19.1z
r`
0
51.0,
2
U
77.2,
aD
E
t
54.3, u
Q
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 85
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account
237711 7/11/2019 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (Continued)
FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / MI
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
0026390 PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF
PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TF
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Total:
237712
7/11/2019
063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC
39214
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES: CHEMICAL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
237713
7/11/2019
073070 PERRINE, JULIE
7842 ART CAMP
7842 ART CAMP INSTRUCTION
7842 ART CAMP INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
237714
7/11/2019
069633 PET PROS
0017109-IN
INV 0017109-IN CUST 07-EDMOND;
K9 HOBBS DOG FOOD
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.26.31.00
Total
237715
7/11/2019
074793 PETDATA INC
7743
INV 7743 EDMONDS PD- JUNE PET
26 PET LICENSE @ $4.20 EA
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
ONE REPLACEMENT TAG
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
9 LATE FEES @ $2.50 EA
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
Total
4.3.b
Page: 17
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 86
4.3.b
vchlist Voucher List Page: 18
07/11/2019 9:49:39AM City of Edmonds
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amoun N
237716
7/11/2019 008400 PETTY CASH
7-9-19 PD ADMIN PC 7-9-19 POLICE ADMIN PETTY CASF
0
m
2 STAFF CARS/STAFF FERRY FARE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
102.1( u
FUEL FOR STAFF CAR TO/FM SHEL
L
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
26.0E
PARKING FOR TRIAL 17-28121
001.000.41.521.22.43.00
44.2(
FUEL FOR CHIEF'S CAR - SIEU LAC
U
001.000.41.521.10.43.00
21.0(
KEYS FOR NEW PARKING SCOOTE
c
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
13.4 -m
Total:
206.91
�a
237717
7/11/2019 071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS
2019-29 INV 2019-29 EDMONDS PD - M.MOC
o
SUMMER WT JUMPSUIT M. MOORE
L-,
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
515.0( a
Freight
E
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
20.0( 'ji
Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
45.4E 0
Total : 580.41 >
0
237718 7/11/2019 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY V440265 WWTP: SVC 250"
a
SVC 250"
Q'
Q
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
65.61 v
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
6.8,
V470560 WWTP: 250' CORDS
rz.
250' CORDS
N
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
89.1( E
Freight
R
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
U
45.0( };
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
13.9E E
Total: 220.45 U
�a
Q
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 87
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
237719
7/11/2019
030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
15349
CEMETERY PLASTIC VASES
CEMETERY PLASTIC VASES
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
Tota I :
237720
7/11/2019
077042 REDTAIL LLC
EBFB.Pmt 2
EBFB.PMT 2 THRU 6/30/19
EBFB.Pmt 2 thru 6/30/19
422.000.72.594.31.65.20
Total
237721
7/11/2019
061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
3-0197-0800478
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
Tota I :
237722
7/11/2019
065001 SCHIRMAN, RON
51
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.23.00
Tota I :
237723
7/11/2019
066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
S5-4557232
FLEET BRAKE INVENTORY
FLEET BRAKE INVENTORY
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
Tota I :
237724
7/11/2019
066754 SNO CO PUBLIC WORKS
I000500510
SNO COUNTY ASSISTANCE LOAN (
Sno. County Assistance Loan 03-201
422.000.72.592.31.83.20
Total
237725
7/11/2019
037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
200202919
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
200274959
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W
4.3.b
Page: 19
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 88
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237725 7/11/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
200326460
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
200493153
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
200663953
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
200913853
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A)
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A)
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
201054327
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
201103561
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
201501277
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1 /2 211 TH F
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
201532926
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S-
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S-
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
201711785
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
201929916
WWTP: 5/23-6/25/19 FLOWMETER
5/23-6/25/19 FLOW METER 23219
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
202077194
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
202139655
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
4.3.b
Page: 20
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
18.3, 'D
U
m
18.3,
N
m
36.1 E
m
c
103.8� M'
c
�a
19.4E p
0
�a
a
36.8,
U
45 32.41 0
7a
0
L
18.4, a
Q
rn
151.3,
ti
0
8.6,
2
U
19.4E
c
a�
E
560.01
Q
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 89
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237725 7/11/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
202250635
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
202289096
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
202356739
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
202499539
LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST
LIFT STATION #1 105 GASPERS ST
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
202529186
STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @
STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
202529202
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 4
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 4
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
202576153
STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS C
STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS C
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
202579488
STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
202579520
WWTP: 6/1-6/30/19 ENERGY MGMT
6/1-6/30/19 ENERGY MANAGEME�
423.000.76.535.80.47.61
204714893
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150'
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150'
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714927
STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
4.3.b
Page: 21
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
25.31 u
17.7z 19
m
55.61
m
c
a�
28.9-
�a
0
479.1 < `5%
M
a
E
3,935.5E 'i
U
4-
0
110.5E
0
L
Q
a
15,907.8( Q
rn
378.8'
ti
0
9.4£ .
�a
U
5.11 (D
E
t
U
120.0' Q
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 90
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher
237725
237726
237727
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
7/11/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued)
204714935
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714943
STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 10
STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 10
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
204714950
STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2
STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
205307580
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
220792758
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
221593742
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
Total
7/11/2019 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2019-5274 INV 2019-5274 EDMONDS PD
455.67 HOUSING DAYS 2 $101.69 E
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
60.67 BOOKINGS @ $58.44 EA
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
37.17 SPECIAL HOUSING @ $58.44
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
40 MENTAL HOUSING @ $141.10 E)
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
12.25 VIDEO CT HOURS @ $138.74
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
Total
7/11/2019 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER June 2019
Crime Victims Court Remittance
Crime Victims Court Remittance
4.3.b
Page: 22
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
60.0(
N
15.2E
95.5' c
d
115.0E
0
L
151.6, a
E
65.2, u
45 22,658.8F 0
7a
0
L
a
46,337.0E Q
rn
7,587.3�
2,172.2- c
5,644.0( ,E
R
U
1,699.5, };
63,440.2.' a0i
E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 91
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.b
Page: 23
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
237727
7/11/2019
070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER
(Continued)
001.000.237.140
421.7z
Tota I :
421.7'
237728
7/11/2019
075675 SORENSON FORENSICS LLC
46602
INV 46602 EDMONDS PD CASE 201
STIR ANALYSIS CASE 19-32698
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
360.0(
Total :
360.0(
237729
7/11/2019
038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103584
WWTP: RECYCLING
Recycling + taxes
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
38.7E
Total:
38.7E
237730
7/11/2019
076324 SUPERION LLC
238240
TRAKITTESTING
Trakit Testing - Data Conversion
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
400.0(
238241
TRAKIT TESTING
Consulting Svcs (5/12/19-5/18/19) Da
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
400.0(
242403
TRAKIT TESTING
Trakit testing - data conversion
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
200.0(
Total :
1,000.0(
237731
7/11/2019
040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
18245809
WATER - PARTS
Water - Parts
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
139.1,
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
14.4 ,
Total :
153.6z
237732
7/11/2019
065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION
DH-11843419
PW ADMIN NEWSPAPER - 1 YEAR ;
PW ADMIN - 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTIO
001.000.65.518.20.49.00
234.6z
Tota I :
234.6'
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 92
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
237733 7/11/2019 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392
237734 7/11/2019 070744 TIGER OAK MEDIA
237735 7/11/2019 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
0002
2019-210781
I•'.11SA
237736 7/11/2019 064972 VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER 07/02/2019
237737 7/11/2019 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH
237738 7/11/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
2019 RENEWAL
63067
237739 7/11/2019 067086 WASHINGTON CRANE AND HOIST CO 0039454-IN
PO # Description/Account
WWTP: 6/6/19 SHIP CHGS
6/6/19 Ship Charges
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
Total :
BUSINESS RECRUITMENT AD SEA -
Business recruitment ad in June 201
001.000.61.558.70.41.40
Total
PM: PINE RIDGE PARK FENCE RE[
PM: PINE RIDGE PARK FENCE REF
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
Total
CIVIL SERVICE PRE -EMPLOYMENT
5 Physical Exams with Labs at $347 E
001.000.22.521.10.41.00
Total
2019 DRUG ANIMAL CONTROL REN
2019 DRUG ANIMAL CONTROL REN
001.000.41.521.70.49.00
Total
INV 63067 EDMONDS PD- CASE 19
TOW SILVER JETTA CASE 19-1588i
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
10.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
Total
WWTP: 2019 CRANE+HOIST INSPE
2019 CRANE+HOIST INSPECTION
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
4.3.b
Page: 24
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
72.6< u
72.6: •L
N
m
1,750.0(
1,750.0(
m
c
a�
906.0(
94.2,
1,000.2: a
E
U
1,735.0( o
1,735.0( 0
0
a
a
55.0( Q
55.0( cn
ti
0
236.2E
24.8" U
261.0E
c
aD
E
t
U
990.0(
Q
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 93
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
237739 7/11/2019 067086 WASHINGTON CRANE AND HOIST CO (Continued)
237740 7/11/2019 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
237741 7/11/2019 073552 W ELCO SALES LLC
237742 7/11/2019 061472 WESTECH ENGINEERING
237743 7/11/2019 075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR
PO # Description/Account
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
119008869 INV 119008869 EDMONDS PD JUNE
JUNE 2019 BACKGROUND CHECK:
001.000.237.100
Total
7673 BUSINESS CARDS- COURT & DEVE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - SHANI
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
COURT - OMAR GAMEZ DOUBLE S
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
Total
72976 WWTP: FILTER MEDIA
Filter Media
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
YAKIMA 7/10/19 EDMONDS PD INMATE HOUSING (E
35 DAYS INMATE HOUSING @$63.6
001.000.39.523.60.41.50
INMATE MEDS - MAY 2019
001.000.39.523.60.31.00
4.3.b
Page: 25
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
102.9E u
1,092.9E
N
m
558.0( v
558.0(
m
c
a�
20.8E
84.7(
�a
a
U
116.5: c
Ta
0
a
240.0( Q
18.0(
26.8' ti
284X
E
2
U
2,227.7E
aD
9.0z t
U
�a
Q
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 94
vchlist
07/11 /2019 9:49:39AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
237743 7/11/2019 075122 075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR (Continued)
237744 7/11/2019 075254 YAKIMA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES J35749
75 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
75 Vouchers in this report
Description/Account
Total ;
2019 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT R/
2019 Interlocal agreement for Rack
512.000.31.518.87.45.00
Total
Bank total
Total vouchers
4.3.b
Page: 26
W
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
2,236.7< 0
U
d
L_
2,781.0(
2,781.0(
265,810.8'
265,810.8' m
c
a�
c
�a
0
L
Q
U
4-
0
0
L
Q
Q
Q
r
ti
0
I_
2
V
a
4)
E
U
Y
Q
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 95
4.3.c
vchlist
07/05/2019 8:56:30AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
7052019 7/5/2019 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
9644 COURT CC STMT - PO CONFRENCI
PROBATION CONFRENCE-
001.000.23.523.30.43.00
PASSPORT FEES
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
Total
Bank total
Total vouchers
Page: 1
m
L
3
c
ea
Amoun wo
0
a
m
318.7E m
=a
169.0E Y
487.8( m
t
487.8(
w
m
487.8(
c
�a
0
L
Q
C
G
.ii
V
4-
0
O
L
Q
a
0)
r
Lh
O
r-
0
3
c
as
E
M
a
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 96
4.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
c
0
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
E
STM
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
c491
E6FE
0.
m
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
ESGA
3
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
�a
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6J13
r
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
Q.
a)
STIR
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
i032
EBDA
U
STIR
2018 Overlay Program
i030
EBCB
4)
SWR
2018 Sewerline Overlays
i035
EBCE
73
ui
Y
SWR
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
U
STIR
2018 Traffic Calming
i027
EBAA
U
r
WTR
2018 Waterline Overlays
i034
EBCD
c
WTR
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
STIR
2019 Downtown Parking Study
s021
E9AC
c
M
STIR
2019 Guardrail Install
i039
E9AB
c
0
STIR
2019 Overlay Program
i036
E9CA
Q.
STIR
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
i041
E9DB
E
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
f°
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
0
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
>
0
STIR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
a
a
STIR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
Q
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
EBJB
r
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
r
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
ti
N
STIR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STIR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
E
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
Z
0
L
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
a
STIR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
d
y
D
STIR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
c
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
Ui
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1 CA
E
t
STIR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
E8CC
U
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
r
r
Q
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STIR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
Revised 7/11/2019
Packet Pg. 97
4.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Proiect
Engineering
Accounting
Proiect
Funding
Proiect Title
Number
Number
STR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
E9DA
STR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
STR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5J13
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
STR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
E5DB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E5KA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
STR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
STR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
sol l
E5GB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
STR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E61FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E31FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E71FA
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E5FD
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
PRK
Waterfront Restoration
m103
E7MA
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
Revised 7/11/2019 Packet Pg. 98
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
4.3.d
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
STIR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
E2FC
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Stud
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STIR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madronalmliffm
STM
E31FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STM
E4FC Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinaer Associated Proiects
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater N
STIR
E5AA
c470
474
STIR
E5DB
c478
SWR
E5GA
c469
SWR
E5GB
s011
WWTP
E5HA
c481
c48A
WTR
E51KA
c473
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
Trackside Warning System
Bikelink Project
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
�ity Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
Five Corners Reservoir
dard Details
STIR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
E6DB
Es016
ADA Transition Plan
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
E6FA
X011
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
Stormwater Comp Plan Updatm
STM
E61FE
c491
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
SWR
017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
2018 Sewerline&placement Project
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
WTR
aterline Replacement Projects
Revised 7/11/2019
Packet Pg. 99
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
4.3.d
Engineering
Project
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
STR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
lbob
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
E7JA
= c498A&
2019 Waterline Replacement
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Restoration
2018 Traffic Calming
STR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E8CB
i030
2018 Overlay Program
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
WTR
E8CD
i034
2018 Waterline Overlays
i035
2018 Sewerline Overlays A
STR
E8DA
i032
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STR
E8DB
ADA Curb Ramps
STR
E8DC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
E8FA
2018 Lorian Woods"'Itudy
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
UTILITIES E8,113 s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming
i039 2019 Guardrail Install
STR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study
STR E9CA i036
i043
STR E9DA i040
STR E9DB i041
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
2019 Overlay Program
2019 Waterline Overlay
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
L A
Revised 7/11/2019
Packet Pg. 100
4.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Protect
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STM
E2FC
c380
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STIR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM
E31FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STIR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STM
E41FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GB
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
STR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
WTR
E5KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STIR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
STIR
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM
E6FE
c491
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
SWR
E6GC
c492
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STM
E61FA
i011
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
SWR
E6GA
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
Revised 7/11/2019 Packet Pg. 101
4.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Protect
Proiect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
WTR
E6JB
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
STR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STR
EBAA
i027
2018 Traffic Calming
STR
EBAB
i028
220th Adaptive
STR
EBCA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR
EBCB
i030
2018 Overlay Program
STR
EBCC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STR
EBDA
i032
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STR
EBDB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
WTR
EBCD
i034
2018 Waterline Overlays
SWR
EBCE
i035
2018 Sewerline Overlays
STR
E9CA
i036
2019 Overlay Program
STR
EBDC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STR
E9AB
i039
2019 Guardrail Install
STR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STR
E9DB
i041
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
STR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Restoration
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
ESGB
s0l l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
STR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR
E6DB
s016
ADA Transition Plan
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
EBFA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
EBJB
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
STR
E9AC
s021
2019 Downtown Parking Study
Revised 7/11/2019 Packet Pg. 102
4.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
PRK
Waterfront Restoration
m103
E7MA
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
c491
E6FE
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E6FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STR
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
i032
EBDA
STR
2018 Overlay Program
i030
EBCB
STR
2018 Traffic Calming
i027
EBAA
STR
2019 Downtown Parking Study
s021
E9AC
STR
2019 Guardrail Install
i039
E9AB
STR
2019 Overlay Program
i036
E9CA
STR
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
i041
E9DB
STR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
STR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1 CA
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
Revised 7/11/2019 Packet Pg. 103
4.3.d
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
E8DB
STIR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
STIR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
iO4o
E9DA
STIR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
STIR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
E5DB
STIR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
STIR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STIR
220th Adaptive
i028
E8AB
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
E5GA
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
SWR
2018 Sewerline Overlays
i035
E8CE
SWR
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
E8GA
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
sol 1
E5GB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s02o
E8JB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6JB
WTR
2018 Waterline Overlays
i034
E8CD
WTR
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
E8JA
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E51KA
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
Revised 7/11/2019 Packet Pg. 104
4.3.e
Hour Type Hour Class
149 KELLY DAY
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 956 (06/24/2019 to 06/24/2019)
Description
KELLY DAYS BUY BACK
Hours Amount
960.00 42,612.18
960.00 $42,612.18
Total Net Pay: $33,286.22
07/11 /2019
Packet Pg. 105
4.3.f
Hour Type
903
Hour Class
MISCELLANEOUS
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 957 (07/01 /2019 to 07/01 /2019)
Description
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
Hours Amount
0.00 6,300.00
0.00 $6,300.00
Total Net Pay: $5,665.37
07/11 /2019
Packet Pg. 106
4.3.g
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 924 (06/16/2019 to 06/30/2019) c
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
-ed2
REGULAR HOURS
Educational Pav Correction
0.00
-156.28
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
11.00
0.00
112
ABSENT
NO PAY NON HIRED
96.00
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
575.00
23,931.10
122
VACATION
VACATION
1,215.25
53,879.06
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
39.00
1,515.17
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
33.00
1,134.83
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
247.50
9,968.45
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
60.00
2,402.86
135
SICK
WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEA
4.00
70.36
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
11.50
365.77
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Dav Used
84.00
3,788.79
152
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME BUY BACK
78.25
4,604.62
153
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY BUY BACK
40.00
2,349.61
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
408.43
19,213.22
157
SICK
SICK LEAVE PAYOFF
1,191.04
74,534.52
158
VACATION
VACATION PAYOFF
911.03
58,411.15
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
4.00
294.21
170
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL BASE PAY
700.00
8,750.00
174
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY
0.00
200.00
175
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICP
0.00
3,521.58
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
16,491.00
673,118.82
191
REGULAR HOURS
FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS
4.00
5,428.18
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
80.00
4,021.50
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
6.50
184.38
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
48.00
2,583.37
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
15.00
1,347.18
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
270.25
18,987.47
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
6.00
440.70
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
184.94
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,330.60
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
7,990.98
601
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP .5
2.00
0.00
07/11 /2019
Packet Pg. 107
4.3.g
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 924 (06/16/2019 to 06/30/2019) c
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
129.50
0.00
603
COMP HOURS
Holidav Comp 1.0
9.00
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
364.38
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 2.0
1.00
0.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
78.66
acp
MISCELLANEOUS
Accreditation 1 % Part Time
0.00
9.67
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
172.00
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC II Certification
0.00
91.74
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstruction ist
0.00
117.51
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
160.86
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
564.90
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
111.20
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
1,075.64
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
649.78
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
829.56
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
5,131.95
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
217.06
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
816.16
Ig10
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY 5.5%
0.00
148.17
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
958.20
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 9%
0.00
5,734.58
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 7%
0.00
1,733.25
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 5%
0.00
1,322.33
Ig15
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY 7.5%
0.00
381.68
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
371.14
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3%
0.00
444.80
Ig6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
281.87
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
507.39
Ig9
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3.5%
0.00
104.93
mels
SICK
Medical Leave Sick
84.00
3,223.06
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
222.40
pols
SICK
Preqnancv Disablitv Sick
4.00
136.55
poly
VACATION
Preqnancv Disablitv Vacation
36.00
1,228.95
07/11 /2019
Packet Pg. 108
4.3.g
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 924 (06/16/2019 to 06/30/2019)
Hour Type
Hour Class
Description
Hours
Amount
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
101.78
phy
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,154.45
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
0.00
173.48
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY
0.00
620.67
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
173.48
sro
MISCELLANEOUS
School Resource Officer
0.00
111.20
str
MISCELLANEOUS
STREET CRIMES
0.00
462.88
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
241.31
23,259.63 $1,015,262.38
Total Net Pay: $665,775.42
07/11 /2019
I Packet Pg. 109
4.3.h
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 924 - 06/16/2019 to 06/30/2019
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
63809
07/05/2019
epoa
EPOA-1 POLICE
69.00
0.00
63810
07/05/2019
jhan
JOHN HANCOCK
619.70
0.00
63811
07/05/2019
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
2,003.74
0.00
63812
07/05/2019
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
4,582.81
0.00
63813
07/05/2019
afscme
WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO
2,403.23
0.00
9,678.48 0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
2898
07/05/2019
pens
DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
318,974.34
0.00
2899
07/05/2019
aflac
AFLAC
5,858.86
0.00
2902
07/05/2019
us
US BANK
129,408.07
0.00
2903
07/05/2019
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N3177B1
131,012.99
0.00
2906
07/05/2019
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
69,678.09
0.00
2908
07/05/2019
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
6,372.32
0.00
2909
07/05/2019
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
1,138.50
0.00
0.00
662,443.17
Grand Totals:
672,121.65
0.00
7/11 /2019
Packet Pg. 110
4.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Confirm Appointment of Board and Commission Candidate
Staff Lead: Mayor Earling
Department: Mayor's Office
Preparer: Carolyn LaFave
Background/History
The Edmonds Sister City Commission has been actively recruiting new Commissioners to fill open
positions on the 12-member board. There are currently three open positions.
Staff Recommendation
Confirm appointment of Rae Podrebarac to position #1 of the Edmonds Sister City Commission.
Narrative
Rae is passionate about Japan and its language and culture. She has a B.A. in Japanese and reads and
speaks the language and has a background in events. Mayor Earling believes Rae will bring great energy
and knowledge to the Commission.
Packet Pg. 111
4.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
WDFW contract for Fishing Pier
Staff Lead: Carrie Hite
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Carrie Hite
Background/History
The City has been under contract with WDFW to manage the construction renovation of the fishing pier.
Council has approved the original WDFW contract, the construction contract, and has been informed of
progress to date.
Staff Recommendation
Approve on consent.
Narrative
The contract for the fishing pier renovation with WDFW has expired. This new contract is to allow the
City to settle with the contractor and to complete repairs of the fishing pier. The total value is $150,000.
Attachments:
19-13320 Contract WDFW Fishing Pier
Packet Pg. 112
4.5.a
Washingwn
&Partmend of
FISH and
i�II.H�IFE
TITLE: City of Edmonds Fishing Pier
CONTRACTOR: City of Edmonds
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
WDFW NUMBER: 19-13320
CONTRACT PERIOD: 05/15/2019 to 06/30/2021
TYPE: Payable / Goods and Services / Interlocal CONTRACT VALUE: $150,000.00
A. PARTIES TO THIS CONTRACT
This Contract is entered into between the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), 600 Capitol
Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091; and City of Edmonds (Contractor), 121 5th Ave N, Edmonds, WA 98020; a
and shall be binding upon the agents and all persons acting by or through the parties.
c
z
B. PURPOSE OF CONTRACT
This contract sets out the terms and conditions by which the Contractor shall provide goods and/or services to
LL
c
WDFW.
c�
C. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
r
The Contractor shall perform the project as described in Attachments, which are incorporated herein by this
0
reference:
Attachment "A" General Terms and Conditions
LL
Attachment "B" Contract/Project Summary
C
�
Attachment "C" Statement of Work
D. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
The performance period under this Contract shall commence on 05/15/2019 and terminate on 06/30/2021. No
expenditures made before or after this period are eligible for reimbursement unless incorporated by written
amendment into this Contract. The Contract may be terminated or the performance period extended pursuant to
terms set forth in Attachment "A."
E. COMPENSATION / PAYMENT
The total dollars provided by WDFW for this project shall not exceed $150,000.00. The Contractor shall be
responsible for all project costs exceeding this amount. Only eligible reimbursement activities that are in direct
support of the project deliverables identified in this Contract will be reimbursed. Any additional services provided
by the Contractor must have prior written approval of WDFW.
Compensation for services rendered shall be payable upon receipt of properly completed invoices, which shall be
submitted to the Project Manager by the Contractor not more often than monthly. The invoices shall describe and
document to WDFW's satisfaction a description of work performed, activities accomplished, or the progress of the
project. The rates shall be in accordance with those herein agreed to.
Payment shall be considered timely if made by WDFW within 30 days after receipt of properly completed invoices
Payment shall be sent to the address designated by the Contractor. WDFW may, in its sole discretion, terminate
the contract or withhold payments claimed by the Contractor for the services rendered if the Contractor fails to
satisfactorily comply with any term or conditions of this contract.
F. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
All rights and obligations of the parties of this Contract are subject to this Contract, including the Attachments,
which are incorporated herein by this reference. By signing this Contract the Contractor acknowledges that they
have read, fully understand, and agree to be bound by all terms and conditions set forth in this Contract.
Page 1
Packet Pg. 113
4.5.a
G. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES, RULES, AND WDFW POLICIES
The Contractor shall comply with, all applicable state, federal, and local laws and regulations, including published
WDFW policies, while performing under this Contract
H. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
In the event of an inconsistency in this contract, unless otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be
resolved by giving precedence in the following order:
Applicable Federal and State of Washington statutes and regulations.
Special Terms and Conditions as contained in this basic contract instrument.
Attachment A - General Terms and Conditions.
Any other provision, term or material incorporated herein by reference or otherwise incorporated.
I. CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES
The below named representatives for each of the parties shall be the contact people for all communications and
billings regarding the performance of this Contract. All written communications regarding this Contract shall be
sent to the designated representatives at the addresses below unless notified in writing of any change.
Contractor's Representative
Carrie Hite
City of Edmonds, Frances Anderson Center
Edmonds WA 98020
(425) 771-0256
carrie.hite@edmondswa.gov
WDFW's Representative
Kristen Kuykendall
600 Capital Way North
Olympia, WA 98501-1091
(360) 902-8383
Kristen. Kuykendall@dfw.wa.gov
J. ENTIRE CONTRACT
This Contract, along with all attachments and exhibits, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties. No other
understandings, verbal or otherwise, regarding this Contract shall exist or bind any of the parties.
K. APPROVAL
This contract shall be subject to the written approval of WDFW'S authorized representative and shall not be
binding until so approved. This Contract may be altered, amended, or waived only by a written amendment
executed by both parties.
IN WITNESS WHERE, WDFW and the Contractor have signed this contract.
CITY OF EDMONDS WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
Signature and Date
Printed Name and Title
Signature and Date
Printed Name and Title
Page 2
Packet Pg. 114
4.5.a
Attachment A -
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Interagency Agreements
DEFINITIONS
As used throughout this contract, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below:
A. "AGENCY" or "WDFW" shall mean the Department of Fish and Wildlife of the State of Washington, any
division, section, office, unit or other entity of the AGENCY, or any of the officers or other officials lawfully
representing that AGENCY.
B. "AGENT" shall mean the Director, and/or the delegate authorized in writing to act on the Director's behalf.
C. "CONTRACTOR" shall mean that firm, provider, organization, individual or other entity performing L
service(s) under this contract, and shall include all employees of the CONTRACTOR. a
D. "RCW" shall mean the Revised Code of Washington. All references in the contract to RCW chapters or c
sections shall include any successor, amended or replacement statutes. N
E. "SUBCONTRACTOR" shall mean one not in the employment of the CONTRACTOR, who is performing all o
or part of those services under this contract under a separate contract with the CONTRACTOR. The
terms "SUBCONTRACTOR" and "SUBCONTRACTORS" means SUBCONTRACTOR(s) in any tier. i
r
c
0
ADVANCE PAYMENTS PROHIBITED
No payments in advance of or in anticipation of goods or services to be provided under this contract shall be o
made by the AGENCY.
L
AMENDMENTS
This contract may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such amendments shall not be binding a.,
unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF 1990, PUBLIC LAW 101-336, also referred to as the
"ADA" 28 CFR Part 35
The CONTRACTOR must comply with the ADA, which provides comprehensive civil rights protection to
individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local government
services, and telecommunications.
ASSIGNMENT
Neither this contract, nor any claim arising under this contract, shall be transferred or assigned by the
CONTRACTOR without prior written consent of the AGENCY.
CONFIDENTIALITY/SAFEGUARDING OF INFORMATION
The CONTRACTOR shall not use or disclose any information concerning the AGENCY, or information that
may be classified as confidential, for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of this
contract, except with prior written consent of the AGENCY, or as may be required by law.
DISALLOWED COSTS
The Contractor is responsible for any audit exceptions or disallowed costs incurred by its own organization or
that of its Subcontractors.
DISPUTES
In the event that a dispute arises under this contract, it shall be determined by a Dispute Board in the following
manner: Each party to this contract shall appoint one member to the Dispute Board. The members so appointed
Page 3
Packet Pg. 115
4.5.a
shall jointly appoint an additional member to the Dispute Board. The Dispute Board shall review the facts,
contract terms and applicable statutes and rules and make a determination of the dispute. The Dispute Board
shall thereafter decide the dispute with the majority prevailing. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be
final and binding on the parties hereto. As an alternative to this process and if applicable, either of the parties
may request intervention by the Governor, as provided by RCW 43.17.330, in which event the Governor's
process will control.
DUPLICATE PAYMENT
The AGENCY shall not pay the CONTRACTOR, if the CONTRACTOR has charged or will charge the State of
Washington or any other party under any other contract or agreement, for the same services or expenses.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or
otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties °'
hereto. a
c
EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT
For the purposes of this contract, "Inventoriable Equipment" shall mean a tangible asset which has a service c
life of more than one year and with a unit cost of $5,000 or greater; and tangible assets with a unit cost of
more than $300 that the AGENCY considers "small and attractive," such as engines, chain saws, i
communications equipment, global position systems, optical devices, cameras, microcomputer and related c
systems, and video equipment; and firearms, boats and motorized vehicles of any value. U
If the CONTRACTOR uses contract funds to purchase Inventoriable Equipment, title to that Inventoriable u
Equipment shall be held by the AGENCY unless otherwise specified in this contract. The AGENCY's
Inventoriable Equipment provided to the CONTRACTOR shall be used only for the performance of this
contract. Title to the AGENCY's Inventoriable Equipment shall remain with the AGENCY. a
The CONTRACTOR shall take reasonable steps to account for and protect Inventoriable Equipment from loss
or damage; report to the AGENCY any loss or damage of such property; and take reasonable steps to protect
such property from further damage. The CONTRACTOR shall surrender to the AGENCY all Inventoriable
Equipment either provided by the AGENCY or purchased with contract funds upon the completion or
termination of this contract.
FINAL INVOICE
The CONTRACTOR shall submit the final invoice not later than 60 calendar days from the end of the contract
period.
GOVERNING LAW
This contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, and
the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for Thurston County.
HOLD HARMLESS
Each party to this contract will be assigned, and assume responsibility for any damages to third parties that are
attributable to the negligent acts or omissions of the individual party. Both parties agree, to the extent
permitted by law, to defend, protect, save and hold harmless the other party, its officers, agents, and
employees from any and all claims, costs, damages, and expenses suffered due to each party's own actions
or those of its agents or employees in the performance of this contract.
INDEPENDENT CAPACITY
The employees or agents of each party who are engaged in the performance of this contract shall continue to be
Page 4
Packet Pg. 116
4.5.a
employees or agents of that party and shall not be considered for any purpose to be employees or agents of the
other party.
NONDISCRIMINATION
During the performance of this contract, both parties shall comply with all federal and state nondiscrimination
laws, regulations and policies. In the event of the CONTRACTOR'S non-compliance or refusal to comply with
any nondiscrimination law, regulation, or policy, this contract may be rescinded, canceled or terminated in
whole or in part, and the CONTRACTOR may be declared ineligible for further contracts with the AGENCY.
The CONTRACTOR shall, however, be given a reasonable time in which to cure this noncompliance. Any
dispute may be resolved in accordance with the "Disputes" procedure set forth herein.
PREVAILING WAGE
If any work performed by subcontractors is subject to Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, the
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that its subcontractors pay the prevailing rate of wages to all subcontractor
workers, laborers or mechanics in the performance of any part of the work described in the contract in
accordance with state law and Department of Labor and Industries rules and regulations.
RECORDS MAINTENANCE
L
The parties to this contract shall each maintain books, records, documents and other evidence which sufficiently
and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended by either party in the performance of the servicesCU
described herein. These records shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by personnel of both parties, other
r
personnel duly authorized by either party, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal officials so authorized by
law. All books, records, documents, and other material relevant to this contract will be retained for six years after
expiration and the Office of the State Auditor, federal auditors, and any persons duly authorized by the parties
o
shall have full access and the right to examine any of these materials during this period. 3:
Records and other documents, in any medium, furnished by one party to this contract to the other party, will
remain the property of the furnishing party, unless otherwise agreed. The receiving party will not disclose or
make available this material to any third parties without first giving notice to the furnishing party and giving it a
reasonable opportunity to respond. Each party will utilize reasonable security procedures and protections to
assure that records and documents provided by the other party are not erroneously disclosed to third parties.
RIGHT OF INSPECTION
The CONTRACTOR shall provide right of access to its facilities to the AGENCY, or any of its officers, or to
any other authorized agent or official of the state of Washington or the federal government, at all reasonable
times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assurance under this contract.
RIGHTS IN DATA
Unless otherwise provided, data which originates from this contract shall be "works for hire" as defined by the
U.S. Copyright Act of 1976 and shall be owned by the AGENCY. Data shall include, but not be limited to, reports,
documents, pamphlets, advertisements, books magazines, surveys, studies, computer programs, films, tapes
and/or sound reproductions. Ownership includes the right to copyright, patent, register and the ability to transfer
these rights.
SAVINGS
In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the
effective date of this contract and prior to normal completion, the AGENCY may terminate the contract under
the "Termination" clause, without the thirty -day notice requirement, subject to renegotiation at the AGENCY'S
discretion under those new funding limitations and conditions.
Paye
Packet Pg. 117
4.5.a
SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this contract are intended to be severable. If any term or provision is illegal or invalid for any
reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the contract.
SUBCONTRACTING
Neither the CONTRACTOR nor any SUBCONTRACTOR shall enter into subcontracts for any of the work
contemplated under this contract without obtaining prior written approval of the AGENCY. In no event shall
the existence of the subcontract operate to release or reduce the liability of the CONTRACTOR to the
AGENCY for any breach in the performance of the CONTRACTOR'S duties. This clause does not include
contracts of employment between the CONTRACTOR and personnel assigned to work under this contract.
Additionally, the CONTRACTOR is responsible for ensuring that all terms, conditions, assurances and
certifications set forth in this contract are carried forward to any subcontracts. CONTRACTOR and its
subcontractors agree not to release, divulge, publish, transfer, sell or otherwise make known to unauthorized c
persons personal information without the express written consent of the agency or as provided by law. a.
c
TERMINATION
Either party may terminate this contract upon 30-days' prior written notification to the other party. If this contract is ii
so terminated, the parties shall be liable only for performance rendered or costs incurred in accordance with the
terms of this contract prior to the effective date of termination.
L
r
TERMINATION FOR CAUSE c
If for any cause, either party does not fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this contract, or if
either party violates any of these terms and conditions, the aggrieved party will give the other party written notice U-
of such failure or violation. The responsible party will be given the opportunity to correct the violation or failure
within 15-working days. If failure or violation is not corrected, this contract may be terminated immediately by
written notice of the aggrieved party to the other.
WAIVER
Waiver of any default or breach shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default or breach. Any
waiver shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this contract unless stated to be such in
writing and signed by authorized representative of the AGENCY.
Page 6
Packet Pg. 118
4.5.a
Attachment B -
CONTRACT/PROJECT SUMMARY
TITLE: City of Edmonds Fishing Pier
WDFW CONTRACT NUMBER: 19-13320
PERIOD: 05/15/2019 to 06/30/2021
WDFW MANAGER:
CONTRACTOR: City of Edmonds
Kristen Kuykendall
CONTRACTOR CONTACT: Carrie Hite
771-0256
600 Capital Way North
(425)
Olympia, WA 98501-1091
CONTRACT TYPE: Payable / Goods and Services /
Y
n.Kuyk83
Kristen.
Kristen.Kuykendall@dfw.wa.gov
Interlocal
SUMMARY CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:
This agreement is to complete the Fishing Pier construction conducted under a prior contract #13-2156
between the parties.
Funding from WDFW will be used for:
-Contract support for engineering services
-Construction contract
-Remaining construction needs for patching and sealing of piers
-City staff time
CFDA Number
Award Year
Award Number
Research &
Development?
a�
a
c
T
ii
L
,0
CU
c
0
0
a_
0
L
a
c
2
U_
U_
0
CU
L
r_
0
U
0
N
M
M
r
C6
�i
C
d
E
t
V
R
r-+
r
Q
Packet Pg. 119
4.5.a
Attachment C -
STATEMENT OF WORK
Introduction
The purpose of this agreement is to complete the work initiated by the parties under
WDFW contact #13-2156, which has not been completed due a contractor default.
2. Funding
WDFW has allocated an additional $150.000.00 WDFW capital budget finding to complete
this project.
3. Description of all Project Requirements
The remaining scope of work consists of the following items:
•Contract support for engineering services
• Construction contract
*Remaining construction needs for patching and sealing of piers
• City staff time
Packet Pg. 120
4.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds School District for Meadowdale Preschool
Staff Lead: Carrie Hite
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Carrie Hite
Background/History
The Council approves this each year.
Staff Recommendation
PPW Committee reviewed this and is forwarding this to full Council for approval on the consent agenda.
Narrative
The Meadowdale Preschool provides a fun, caring, secure and positive learning environment where
children enjoy hands-on curriculum in math, science, art, writing, music and large motor activities. Open
play and structured group times provide children with opportunities to learn social, emotional, and
academic skills to prepare them for kindergarten.
The City of Edmonds has had an Interlocal Agreement for many years with the Edmonds School District
for the Meadowdale Preschool program.
This ILA allows the Edmonds School District to place up to 3 students into the Meadowdale Preschool
program run by the Parks and Recreation Department. There is no charge to the families of these 3
students as the School District pays the enrollment fees.
Attachments:
CITY OF EDMONDS - INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT 19-20
Packet Pg. 121
4.6.a
b'I)MO NI]S
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15
LS 20420 — 68TH Avenue West
Lynnwood, WA 98036
SCH(DL 425-431-7000
V I-S R i C I
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15
AND
CITY OF EDMONDS
Whereas, Chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local government units to make the
most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other government entities on the
basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner pursuant to forms of
governmental organizations that will accord best with geographic, economic population, and other factors
influencing the needs and development of local communities, now therefore, the following agreement is
established.
This Contract is made and entered into by and between EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15,
hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT", and CITY OF EDMONDS, hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR."
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this contract is to: Provide educational services to district students as described in scope
of work.
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
The Contract Manager for each of the parties shall be the contact person for all communications and
billings regarding the performance of this contract.
Contract Manager for CONTRACTOR is:
Contract Manager for DISTRICT is:
Contract Mgr. Name: Todd Cort
Contract Mgr. Name: Bo Zhao
Contractor Name: CITY OF EDMONDS
Department Name: Student Services
Address: 700 Main St
Address 20420 68th Ave W
City, State Zip Code: Edmonds, WA 98020
City, State Zip Code: Lynnwood, WA 98036
Phone: (425) 771-0232 Fax: (425) 771-0253
Phone: (425) 431-7177 Fax: (425) 431-7339
E-mail address: todd.cort@edmondswa.gov
E-mail address: zhaob310@edmonds.wednet.edu
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR have a collaborative arrangement for services to preschool
children with disabilities. This includes enrollment of preschool children with disabilities in the
CONTRACTOR preschool program. These students participate in the classroom activities and are
supported by DISTRICT special education staff. This allows students with disabilities to participate
with typically developing peers.
Packet Pg. 122
4.6.a
A. Attachment: A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, contains the General Terms and
Conditions governing work to be performed under this contract, the nature of the working relationship
between the DISTRICT and the CONTRACTOR, and specific obligations of both parties.
3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Subject to other contract provisions, the Period of Performance under this contract will be from
September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2020, with the option to renew for four additional one year
periods.
4. COMPENSATION/ PAYMENT
Compensation for services rendered shall be based on the schedule set forth in ATTACHMENT B, Fees
and Expenses.
5. EXPENSES:
The District does not cover expenses for independent contractors. Any anticipated expenses must be
included as part of the Contractor's compensation.
6. BILLING PROCEDURES
DISTRICT will pay CONTRACTOR upon receipt of properly completed invoices, which shall be submitted
to the contract manager not more often than monthly. The invoices shall describe and document, to the
DISTRICT'S satisfaction, the work performed, the progress of the project, and fees.
Payment shall be considered timely if made by the DISTRICT within thirty (30) days after receipt of
properly completed invoices. Payment shall be sent to the address designated by the CONTRACTOR.
The DISTRICT may, in its sole discretion, terminate the contract or withhold payments claimed by the
CONTRACTOR for services rendered if the CONTRACTOR fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or
condition of this contract.
No payments in advance or in anticipation of services or supplies to be provided under this contract shall
be made by the DISTRICT.
The DISTRICT shall not pay any claims for payment for services submitted more than twelve (12) months
after the calendar month in which the services were performed.
DUPLICATION OF BILLED COSTS: The CONTRACTOR shall not bill the DISTRICT for services
performed under this contract, and the DISTRICT shall not pay the CONTRACTOR, if the CONTRACTOR
is entitled to payment or has been or will be paid by any other source, including grants, for that service.
DISALLOWED COSTS: The CONTRACTOR is responsible for any audit exceptions or disallowed costs
incurred by its own organization or that of its subcontractors.
7. ASSURANCES
DISTRICT and the CONTRACTOR agree that all activity pursuant to this contract will be in accordance
with all the applicable current federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations.
8. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
Each of the exhibits listed below is by this reference hereby incorporated into this contract. In the event
of an inconsistency in this contract, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the
following order:
■ Applicable Federal and state of Washington statutes and regulations;
■ Special Terms and Conditions as contained in this basic contract instrument;
■ Attachment A — General Terms and Conditions;
■ Attachment B — Fees & Expenses
■ Any other provision, term or material incorporated herein by reference or otherwise incorporated.
Page 2 of 14
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS - INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT 71112019
Packet Pg. 123
4.6.a
9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This contract, including referenced exhibits, represents all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the
parties. No other understandings or representations oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this
contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto.
10. CONFORMANCE
If any provision of this contract violates any statute or rule of law of the state of Washington, it is
considered modified to conform to that statute or rule of law.
11. APPROVAL
This contract shall be subject to the written approval of the DISTRICT'S authorized representative and
shall not be binding until so approved. The contract may be altered, amended or waived only by a written
amendment executed by both parties.
THIS CONTRACT, consisting of 4 pages and 2 attachments, is executed by the persons signing below
who warrant that they have the authority to execute the contract.
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15
CONTRACTOR:
Dana Geaslen, Executive Director, Student Services
(Signature)
Board Approval Date
Printed name and title
Jenna Valach
Director of Budget & Finance
CITY OF EDMONDS
Company Name
700 Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020
Address
425 771-0232 425 771-0253
Phone FAX
todd.cort@edmonds .l;oy
Email
FEIN or SSN WA UBI
Page 3 of 14
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS - INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT 71112019
Packet Pg. 124
4.6.a
ATTACHMENT A
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Definitions
As used throughout this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
A. "CLIENT" shall mean an individual receiving services under this Agreement.
B. "CONTRACTOR" shall mean that agency, firm, provider organization, individual or other
entity performing services under this Agreement. It shall include any subcontractor retained
by the prime contractor as permitted under the terms of this agreement.
C. "CONTRACTING OFFICER" shall mean that individual authorized to execute this
agreement on behalf of the DISTRICT.
D. "DISTRICT" shall mean the Edmonds School District, any division, section, office, unit or
other entity of the DISTRICT or any of the officers or other officials lawfully representing that
DISTRICT.
E. "PERSONAL INFORMATION" means information identifiable to any person, including, but
not limited to, information that relates to a person's name, health, finances, education,
business, use or receipt of governmental services or other activities, addresses, telephone
numbers, social security numbers, driver license numbers, other identifying numbers, and
any financial identifiers.
"SUBCONTRACTOR" shall mean one not an employee of the contractor, who is
performing all or part of those services under this Agreement under a separate contract with
the contractor. The terms "subcontractor" and "subcontractors" mean subcontractor(s) in
any tier.
G. VENDOR" is an entity that agrees to provide the amount and kind of services requested by
the District; provides services under the contract only to those beneficiaries individually
determined to be eligible by the District and, provides services on a fee for service or per
unit basis with contractual penalties if the entity fails to meet program performance
standards.
2. Provision of Services:
Contractor agrees to provide the amount and kind of services requested by the District; provides
services under the contract only to those beneficiaries individually determined to be eligible by the
District and, provides services on a fee -for -service or per -unit basis with contractual penalties if the
entity fails to meet program performance standard.
3. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Of 1990,
Public Law 101-336, also referred to as the "ADA" 28 CFR PART 35
The contractor must comply with the ADA, which provides comprehensive civil rights protection to
individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local
government services, and telecommunications.
4. Assignment
Neither this contract, nor any claim arising under this contract, shall be transferred or assigned by the
contractor without prior written consent of the DISTRICT.
5. Background Check
At no additional cost to the district, the contractor will ensure that the contractor or any employees
who will have regularly scheduled unsupervised access to children shall require a record check
through the Washington state patrol criminal identification system under RCW 43.43.830 through
43.43.834, 10.97.030, and 10.97.050 and through the federal bureau of investigation before hiring an
employee. The record check shall include a fingerprint check using a complete Washington state
criminal identification fingerprint card.
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 4 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 125
4.6.a
6. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility
Contractor certifies that to the best of their knowledge/belief that neither it nor its principals are
presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
for the award of contracts by any Federal governmental agency or department. Further, AGENCY
certifies that they are not presently indicted for or have not within a three year period proceeding this
bid been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public transaction
or contract.
If it is later determined that the Contractor knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition
to any other remedies available to the District, the District may terminate this transaction for default.
Further, it is the responsibility of the Contractor to verify that lower -tier parties to this transaction are
not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded for the award of contracts by any Federal governmental agency or department.
7. Change in Status
In the event of substantive change in the legal status, organizational structure or fiscal reporting
responsibility of the contractor, contractor agrees to notify the DISTRICT of the change. Contractor
shall provide notice as soon as practicable, but no later than thirty -days after such a change takes
effect.
8. Changes and Modifications
A. The contracting officer may, at any time, by written notification to the contractor, and without
notice to any known guarantor or surety, make changes within the general scope of the
services to be performed under the contract. If the contractor agrees to such changes, a
written contract amendment reflecting such change shall be executed by the parties. An
equitable adjustment in cost or period of performance or both may be made if required by
the change. Any claim for adjustment in price or period of performance must be received
within thirty (30) days of the contractor's receipt of the change notice.
B. The contracting officer may, however, receive and act upon any such claim at any time prior
to final payment under the contract at his/her discretion.
C. Failure to agree to any adjustment made under this section shall be an issue and may be
reviewed as provided in the "Disputes" section of this agreement. Nothing in this section
shall excuse the contractor from proceeding with the contract as changed.
9. Compliance with Applicable Law
Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws applicable to public contracts, to the
work done under this Contract, and with all regulations and administrative rules established pursuant
to those law
10. Conflict of Interest
A. The DISTRICT may, in its sole discretion, by written notice to the contractor, terminate this
contract if it finds, after due notice and examination by the contracting Officer, that there is a
violation of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW; or any similar statute
involving the contractor in the procurement of or performance under, this contract.
B. In the event this contract is terminated as provided above, the DISTRICT shall be entitled to
pursue the same remedies against the contractor as it could pursue in the event of a breach
of the contract by the contractor. The rights and remedies of the DISTRICT provided for in
this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies
provided by law. The existence of facts upon which the contracting officer makes any
determination under this clause shall be an issue and may be reviewed as provided in the
"Disputes" clause of this contract.
11. Covenant Against Contingent Fees
The contractor warrants that no person or selling agent has been employed or retained to solicit or
secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 5 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 126
4.6.a
or contingent fee, excepting bonafide employees or bonafide established agent maintained by the
contractor for the purpose of securing business. The District shall have the right, in the event of
breach of this clause by the contractor, to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion, to
deduct from the contract price or consideration or recover by other means the full amount of such
commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fees.
12. Disputes - Mediation
A. Except as otherwise provided in this contract, when a dispute arises between the parties
and it cannot be resolved by direct negotiation, the parties agree to participate in mediation
in good faith. The mediator shall be chosen by agreement of the parties. If the parties
cannot agree on a mediator, the parties shall use a mediation service that selects the
mediator for the parties. The parties agree that mediation shall precede any action in a
judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal.
B. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to limit the parties' choice of a mutually
acceptable alternative resolution method such as a disputes hearing, a dispute resolution
board or arbitration.
13. Disallowed Costs
The Contractor is responsible for any audit exceptions or disallowed costs incurred by its own
organization or that of its Subcontractors.
14. Employee Removal.
At District's request, Contractor will immediately remove any Contractor employee from all District
properties in cases where the District determines, in its sole discretion, that removal of that employee
is in the District's best interests.
15. Governing Law
This contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of
Washington and the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Superior Court for Snohomish
County.
16. Indemnification
The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the District, its board of directors, officers,
employees, or agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities and expenses, including
attorney's fees, arising out of or resulting from any injuries to persons (including death) or damage to
property arising from acts or omissions of the Contractor, its employees, agents or subcontractors,
however caused.
17. Insurance
The Contractor shall purchase and maintain at its own cost in a company or companies licensed and
admitted to do business in the State of Washington such comprehensive general liability and other
insurance, on an occurrence basis, and as will provide protection from claims set forth below which
may arise out of or result from the Contractor's operations under the contract, whether to be
performed or furnished by the Contractor, by any subcontractor, by anyone directly or indirectly
employed by any of them to perform or furnish any of the products or services, or by anyone for
whose acts any of them may be liable.
Edmonds School District No. 15 shall be named as a primary, non-contributing additional insured on
such policies other than state workers' compensation. The District's specification or approval of this
insurance or of its amount shall not relieve or decrease the liability of the Contractor under this
contract or otherwise. Policies shall contain a provision that the District shall be given 30 days written
notice by certified mail before cancellation of any insurance or reduction of the amount thereof, or any
alteration, modification or restriction thereto. Upon acceptance of contract and prior to any work
being performed, a certificate of insurance with additional insured endorsement attached shall be
mailed to:
Edmonds School District No. 15
Attn: Risk Management
20420 68th Ave W
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400
Or sent via email to: RiskMgmt@edmonds.wednet.edu
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 6 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 127
4.6.a
REQUIRED COVERAGE:
A. Claims under workers' or workmen's compensation, disability benefits and other similar
employee benefit acts, including Contingent Employers Liability (Stop Gap);
B. Claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, or death of
the Contractor's employees;
C. Claims for damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death of any person
other than the Contractor's employees;
D. Claims for damages insured by personal injury liability coverage which are sustained (a) by
any person as a result of an offense directly or indirectly related to the employment of such
person by the Contractor, or (b) by any other person for any other reason. Claims for
damages, other than to the products or services themselves, because of injury to or
destruction of tangible property wherever located, including loss of use resulting therefrom;
E. Claims arising out of operation of Laws or Regulations for damages because of bodily injury
or death of any person or for damage to property;
F. Claims for damages because of bodily injury or death of any person or property damage
arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of any motor vehicle, including coverage for
Owned Motor Vehicles, Non -Owned Motor Vehicles and Hired or Borrowed Motor Vehicles;
G. Comprehensive General Liability;
H. Blanket Contractual Liability;
I. Comprehensive Auto Liability; and
J. Claims for damages arising out of the contractor's errors and omissions while performing
professional services
K. These required coverage shall be written for not less than the following (or greater if
required by law):
Worker's Compensation:
State: Statutory
$500,000
Employer's Liability:
Comprehensive General Liability
(including Premises -Operations;
Bodily Injury; Property
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
Independent Contractor's Protective;
Damage; Combined
Each
Aggregate
Products and Completed Operations;
Single Limit:
Occurrence
Broad -Form Property Damage):
Bodily Injury; Property
$1,0001000
000
Damage; Combined
Each
ate
Aggregate
Aggre
Single Limit:
Occurrence
Blanket Contractual Liability:
Personal Injury, with
$1,0001000
000
Employment Exclusion
Each
Aggre
Aggregate
Deleted:
Occurrence
Bodily Injury; Property
$1,000,000
000
Comprehensive Automobile Liability:
Damage; Combined
Each
Aggregate
Aggregate
Single Limit:
Occurrence
Damages arising out of
the contractor's errors and
Professional Errors and Omissions
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
Aggregate
omissions while
Each
Liability
performing professional
Occurrence
services
18. Independent Capacity
The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this contract. The
contractor and his or her employees or agents performing under this contract are not employees or
agents of the District. The contractor will not hold himself/herself out as nor claim to be an officer or
employee of the District by reason hereof, nor will the contractor make any claim of right, privilege or
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 7 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 128
4.6.a
benefit that would accrue to such employee under law. Conduct and control of the work will be solely
with the contractor.
Industrial Insurance Cove
A. The contractor shall comply with the provisions of Title 51 RCW, Industrial Insurance. If the
contractor fails to provide industrial insurance coverage or fails to pay premiums or
penalties on behalf of its employees as may be required by law, the District may collect
from the contractor the full amount payable to the Industrial Insurance accident fund. The
District may:
B. Deduct the amount owed by the contractor to the accident fund from the amount payable to
the contractor by District under this contract; and
C. Transmit the deducted amount to the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I), Division of
Insurance Services.
D. This provision does not waive any of L&I's rights to collect from the contractor.
19. Licensinq and Accreditation Standards
The contractor shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal licensing, accreditation and
registration requirements/standards, necessary in the performance of this contract.
20. Limitation of Authority
Only the contracting officer or his/her delegate by writing (delegation to be made prior to action) shall
have the express, implied or apparent authority to alter, amend, modify or waive any clause or
condition of this contract. Furthermore, any alteration, amendment, modification or waiver of any
clause or condition of this contract is not effective or binding unless made in writing and signed by the
contracting officer.
21. Nondiscrimination
During the performance of this contract, the contractor shall comply with all federal and state
nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies. In the event of the contractor's noncompliance or
refusal to comply with any nondiscrimination law, regulation or policy, this contract may be rescinded,
canceled or terminated in whole or in part, and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further
contracts with the District. The contractor shall, however, be given a reasonable time in which to cure
this noncompliance. Any dispute may be resolved in accordance with the "Disputes" procedure set
forth herein.
22. Overpayments and Assertion of Lien
In the event that the District establishes overpayments or erroneous payments made to the contractor
under this contract, the District may secure repayment, plus interest, if any, through the filing of a lien
against the contractor's real property or by requiring the posting of a bond, assignment of deposit or
some other form of security acceptable to the District or by doing both.
23. Ownership of Work Products.
Contractor agrees that any and all goods or services provided by or developed for District are
intended as "works made for hire" by Contractor for District. As a work made for hire, all work
products (including intellectual property) created by the Contractor, as part of Contractor's
performance under this Contract shall be the exclusive property of the District. If any such work
products contain Contractor's intellectual property that is or could be protected by federal copyright,
patent, or trademark laws, Contractor hereby grants District a perpetual, royalty -free, fully -paid, non-
exclusive, and irrevocable license to copy, reproduce, deliver, publish, perform, dispose of, and use
or re -use, in whole or in part, and to authorize others to do so, all such work products. District shall
have no right in any pre-existing work product of Contractor provided to District by Contractor in the
performance of this Contract, except to copy, use, or re -use any such work product for District use
only.
24. Privacy
A. This provision is required by statute. As required by the 20 USC 1232(g) (Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act, "FERPA"), and RCW 28A.605.030, Contractor shall not
disclose any information or records regarding students or their families that Contractor may
learn or obtain in the course and scope of its performance of this Contract
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 8 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 129
4.6.a
B. FERPA Re -disclosure. The parties recognize that FERPA imposes strict penalties for
improper disclosure or re -disclosure of confidential student information, including but not
limited to denial of access to personally identifiable information ("PII") from education
records for at least five years (34 CFR 99.33(e)). Therefore, consistent with FERPA's
requirements, PH obtained by Contractor in the performance of this Contract may not be re -
disclosed to third parties without the written consent of the student's parent/guardian and
must be used only for the purposes identified in this Contract
C. Personal information collected, used or acquired in connection with this contract shall be
used solely for the purposes of this contract. Contractor and its subcontractors agree not to
release, divulge, publish, transfer, sell or otherwise make known to unauthorized persons
personal information without the express written consent of the agency or as provided by
law.
D. Contractor agrees to implement physical, electronic and managerial safeguards to prevent
unauthorized access to personal information.
E. The District reserves the rights to monitor, audit or investigate the use of personal
information collected, used or acquired by the contractor through this contract. The
monitoring, auditing or investigating may include but is not limited to "salting" by the District.
Contractor shall certify the return or destruction of all personal information upon expiration
of this contract. Salting is the act of placing a record containing unique but false information
in a database that can be used later to identify inappropriate disclosure of data contained in
the database.
F. Any breach of this provision may result in termination of the contract and the demand for
return of all personal information. The contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
the District for any damages related to the contractor's unauthorized use of personal
information.
G. For the purposes of this provision, personal information includes but is not limited to
information identifiable to an individual that relates to a natural person's health, finances,
education, business, use or receipt of governmental services or other activities, names,
addresses, telephone numbers, social security numbers, driver license numbers, financial
profiles, credit card numbers, financial identifiers and other identifying numbers.
25. Records, Documents, and Reports
Contractor agrees that District and its authorized representatives are entitled to review all Contractor
books, documents, papers, plans, and records, electronic or otherwise ("Records"), directly pertinent
to this Contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcripts. The
contractor shall maintain all books, records, documents, data and other evidence relating to this
contract and performance of the services described herein, including but not limited to accounting
procedures and practices, which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any
nature expended in the performance of this contract. Contractor shall retain such records for a period
of six years following the date of final payment. At no additional cost, these records, including
materials generated under the contract, shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review
or audit by the District, personnel duly authorized by the District, the Office of the State Auditor, and
federal and state officials so authorized by law, regulation or agreement.
If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the records
shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved.
26. Registration with Department of Revenue
The contractor shall complete registration with the Department of Revenue, General Administration
Building, Olympia WA 98504, and be responsible for payment of all taxes due on payments made
under this contract.
27. Right of Inspection
The contractor shall provide right of access to its facilities to the District or any of its officers at all
reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality
assurance under this contract on behalf of the District. All inspections and evaluations shall be
performed in such a manner that will not unduly interfere with the contractor's business or work
hereunder.
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 9 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 130
4.6.a
28. Rights in Data
A. Unless otherwise provided, data that originates from this contract shall be "works for hire"
as defined by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976 and shall be owned by the District. Data shall
include, but not be limited to, reports, documents, pamphlets, advertisements, books,
magazines, surveys, studies, computer programs, films, tapes, and/or sound reproductions.
Ownership includes the right to copyright, patent, register and the ability to transfer these
rights.
B. Data that is delivered under the contract, but that does not originate there from, shall be
transferred to the District with a nonexclusive, royalty free, irrevocable license to publish,
translate, reproduce, deliver, perform, dispose of, and to authorize others to do so; provided
that such license shall be limited to the extent that the contractor has a right to grant such a
license.
C. The contractor shall exert all reasonable effort to advise the District, at the time of delivery
of data furnished under this agreement, of all known or potential invasions of privacy
contained therein and of any portion of such document, which was not produced in the
performance of this agreement.
D. The District shall receive prompt written notice of each notice or claim or copyright
infringement received by the contractor with respect to any data delivered under this
agreement. The District shall have the right to modify or remove any restrictive markings
placed upon the data by the contractor.
29. Safeguarding of Information
The contractor shall not use or disclose any:
A. Personal Information gained by reason of this contract or:
B. Information that may be classified as confidential for any purpose not directly connected
with the administration of this contract except (1) with prior written consent of the District or
(2) as may be required by law. The contractor shall safeguard such information and shall
return or certify destruction of the information upon contract expiration or termination.
30. Savings
In the event funding from state, federal or other sources is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way
after the effective date of this contract and prior to normal completion, the District may terminate the
contract under the "Termination for Convenience" clause, without advance notice, subject to
renegotiation at the District's discretion under those new funding limitations and conditions.
31. Security
Any disclosure or removal of any District matter or property by Contractor shall be cause for
immediate termination of this Contract. Contractor shall bear sole responsibility for any liability
including, but not limited to attorneys' fees, resulting from any action or suit brought against District as
a result of Contractor's willful or negligent release of information, documents, or property contained in
or on District property. District hereby deems all information, documents, and property contained in or
on District property privileged and confidential.
32. Severability
If any provision of this contract or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall be
held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this contract that can be given effect
without the invalid provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law and
the fundamental purpose of this contract, and to this end the provisions of this contract are declared
to be severable.
33. Subcontracting
Neither the contractor nor any Subcontractor shall enter into subcontracts for any of the work
contemplated under this contract without obtaining prior written approval of the District. In no event
shall the existence of the subcontract operate to release or reduce the liability of the contractor to the
District for any breach in the performance of the contractor's duties.
This clause does not include contracts of employment between the contractor and personnel
assigned to work under this contract.
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 10 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 131
4.6.a
34. Termination for Convenience
Except as otherwise provided in this contract, the contracting officer may, by ten (10) days written
notice, beginning on the second day after the mailing, terminate this contract in whole or in part. If
this contract is so terminated, the District shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of
this INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT rendered or goods delivered prior to the effective date of
termination.
35. Termination for Default
A. The contracting officer may terminate this contract for default, in whole or in part, by written
notice to the contractor if the District has a reasonable basis to believe that the contractor has
1. Failed to meet or maintain any requirement for contracting with the District;
2. Failed to ensure the health or safety of any client for whom services are being provided
under this contract;
3. Failed to perform under or otherwise breached, any term or condition of this contract;
and/or
4. Violated any applicable law or regulation.
B. If it is later determined that the contractor was not in default, the termination shall be
considered a termination for convenience.
36. Termination Procedure
A. Upon termination of this contract, the District, in addition to any other rights provided in this
contract, may require the contractor to deliver to the District any property specifically produced
or acquired for the performance of such part of this agreement as has been terminated. The
provisions of the "Treatment of Assets" clause shall apply in such property transfer.
B. The District shall pay to the contractor the agreed upon price, if separately stated, for
completed work and services accepted by the District and the amount agreed upon by the
contractor and the contracting officer for (a) completed work and services for which no separate
price is stated, (b) partially completed work and services, (c) other property or services that are
accepted by the District, and (d) the protection and preservation of the property, unless the
termination is for default, in which case the contracting officer shall determine the extent of the
liability of the District. Failure to agree with such determination shall be a dispute within the
meaning of the "Disputes" clause of this agreement.
C. The District may withhold from any amounts due the contractor for such completed work or
services such sum as the contracting officer determines to be necessary to protect the District
against potential loss or liability.
D. The rights and remedies of the District provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in
addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement.
E. After receipt of a notice of termination, and except as otherwise directed by the contracting
officer, the contractor shall:
F. Stop work under the agreement on the date and to the extent specified in the notice;
G. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services or facilities except as necessary
to complete such portion of the work not terminated;
H. Assign to the District, in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the contracting
officer, all of the rights, titles, and interest of the contractor under the orders and subcontracts in
which case the District has the right, at its discretion, to settle or pay any or all claims arising
out of the termination of such orders and subcontracts.
I. Settle all outstanding liabilities and all claims arising out of such termination of orders and
subcontracts, with the approval or ratification of the contracting officer to the extent he/she may
require, which approval or ratification shall be final for all the purposes of this clause;
J. Transfer title to the District and deliver, in the manner, at the times and to the extent as directed
by the contracting officer, any property which, if the contract had been completed, would have
been required to be furnished to the District;
K. Complete performance of such part of the work not terminated by the contracting officer; and,
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 11 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 132
4.6.a
Take such action as may be necessary or as the contracting officer may direct, for the
protection and preservation of the property related to this agreement that is in the possession of
the contractor and in which the District has or may acquire an interest.
37. Treatment of Assets
A. Title to all property financed or furnished by the District shall remain in the District. Title to all
property purchased by the contractor, for which the contractor is entitled to be reimbursed as a
direct item of cost under this contract, shall pass to and vest in the District upon delivery of such
property to the contractor. Title to other property, the cost of which is reimbursable to the
contractor under the contract, shall pass to and vest in the District upon (i) issuance for use of
such property in the performance of this contract or (ii) commencement of use of such property
in the performance of this contract or (iii) reimbursement of the cost thereof by the District in
whole or in part, whichever first occurs.
B. Any property of the District furnished to the contractor shall, unless otherwise provided herein
or approved by the District, be used only for the performance of this contract.
C. The contractor shall be responsible for any loss or damage to property of the District that
results from the negligence of the contractor or that results from the failure on the part of the
contractor to maintain and administer that property in accordance with sound management
practices.
D. If any District property is lost, destroyed or damaged, the contractor shall notify the District and
shall take all reasonable steps to protect the property from further damage.
E. The contractor shall surrender to the District all property of the District prior to settlement upon
completion, termination or cancellation of this agreement.
F. All reference to the contractor under this clause shall include contractor's employees, agents or
subcontractors.
38. Waiver of Default
Waiver of any default or breach shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default or
breach. Waiver shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the contract unless stated
to be such in writing, signed by the contracting officer of the District.
39. Work Performed on District Property
Contractor shall comply with the following:
A. Identification: When performing work on District property, Contractor shall be in full uniform at
all times. Uniforms must include shirt with attached Contractor company identification. All such
persons must also carry photo identification and must present it to any District personnel upon
request. If Contractor cannot produce such identification or if the identification is unacceptable
to District, District may provide at its sole discretion, District -produced identification tags to
Contractor, costs to be borne by Contractor. If Contractor does not have a specific uniform for
its employees, then Contractor shall provide identification tags as described above and/or any
other mechanism the District in its sole discretion determines is required to easily and
appropriately identify Contractors.
B. Sign -in Required: As required by schools and other District locations, each day Contractor's
employees are present on District property, those employees must sign into the location's main
office to receive an in -school identification/visitors tag. Contractor's employees must display
this tag on their person at all times while on District property.
C. No Smoking: All District properties are tobacco -free zones; Contractor is prohibited from using
any tobacco product on District property.
D. No Drugs: All District properties are drug -free.
E. No Weapons or Firearms: Except as provided by statute and District policy, all District
properties are weapons- and firearms -free zones; Contractor is prohibited from possessing on
its persons or in its vehicles any weapons or firearms while on District property.
F. Unsupervised Contact with Students
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 12 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 133
4.6.a
G. This provision is required by statute. "Unsupervised contact' with students means contact that
provides the person opportunity and probability for personal communication or touch with
students when not under direct District supervision. As required by RCW 28A.400.303,
Contractor shall ensure that Contractor, any subcontractors, and their officers, employees, and
agents will have no direct, unsupervised contact with students while on District property.
Contractor will work with District to ensure compliance with this requirement. If Contractor is
unable to ensure through a security plan that none of its officers, employees, or agents or those
of its subcontractors will have direct, unsupervised contact with students in a particular
circumstance or circumstances, Contractor shall notify District before beginning any work that
could result is such contact. Contractor authorizes District to obtain information about
Contractor and its history and to conduct a criminal background check, including fingerprinting,
of any Contractor officers, employees, or agents who will have unsupervised contact with
students. Contractor shall cause its employees and/or subcontractors, if any, to authorize
District to conduct these background checks. Contractor shall pay all fees for processing the
background check. District may deduct the cost of such fees from a progress or final payment
to Contractor under this Contract, unless Contractor elects to pay such fees directly.
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT Rev 8/2/11 Page 13 of 14
Terms and Conditions
Packet Pg. 134
4.6.a
ATTACHMENT B FEES AND EXPENSES
Tuition based on the following level of services:
Annual tuition cost of approximately $3, 250 per student, pro -rated for partial year enrollment,
with variations due to specific days and times, plus possible one time fees for registration and
supplies.
Anticipated enrollment is 3 students. Total contract amount may change based on changes in
enrollment. All enrollment changes must be approved by District through the IEP process.
Interagency Agreement Rev 8/2/11 Page 14 of 14
ATTACHMENT B — FEES AND EXPENSES
Packet Pg. 135
4.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Proposal for Personal Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Royce Napolitino
Background/History
The Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor position has remained unfilled for over two years.
Continuing to advertise this opening has resulted in a stagnant recruitment process that is not producing
viable candidates. We want to suspend the advertisements at this time and retry at a later date with a
revised position title and job description. In the meantime we can no longer wait for the additional
management assistance that we need. Presented during 07-09-19 Parks & Public Works and Finance
Committees with Personnel Committee concurrence.
Staff Recommendation
Public Works Director and Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager recommend creation of a contracted
position for a one-year term as a temporary measure.
Narrative
The Public Works Department and the Division of Wastewater treatment wish to enter into a one-year
contract with a Project Employee. This agreement would be entered into with Michael Derrick, former
General Manager of Ronald Wastewater District. The Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor position
has remained unfilled for some time. In lieu of pursuing further Supervisory candidates now, the Project
employee contract would allow the continuation and renewal of functions of the Plant Supervisor under
the direction of the Project Employee. This Contract Employee would provide budget oversight, contract
management, project oversight, and productivity measurement during the term of the agreement.
Attachments:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Summary of Benefit - non represented Employees
Empoyee Agreement WWTP Program Admin - DRAFT - M. DERRICK 07.02.19
Packet Pg. 136
4.7.a
City of Attachment 1
EDMONDS
Washington
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Program Administrator
Department: Public Works — Wastewater Treatment
Bargaining Unit: Contract Position FLSA Status: Exempt
Creation Date: July 2019 Reports To: WWTP Manager
POSITION PURPOSE: Under general direction, plans, organizes and coordinates programs in support of the
City's Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Is responsible for implementing the WWTP's safety program and
nurturing a culture of safety first; responsible for development and implementation of policies and procedure
designed to improve efficiency of operation and promote fiscal responsibility. Additional responsibilities include
oversight of the plant asset management program utilizing the established records management system and
assisting with the development and management of capital projects. Assists Manager in preparation and
monitoring of the annual operating budget, Capital Improvement Program and when assigned, performs the
duties of the WWTP Manager.
Scope of duties.
• Plan, organize, and coordinate a variety of programs, projects and activities to the operation and
maintenance of the City's wastewater treatment plant.
• Oversee the maintenance management system and asset management program.
• Act as management lead on the WWTP safety committee.
• During periods of absence assumes Manager Roles and responsibilities.
• Prepare and maintain a variety of reports, records and files related to assigned activities.
• Provide input to Manager for the O&M budget process, recommend and plan capital projects, control
and authorize expenditures in accordance with established limitations.
• Administer Capital Improvement projects, make recommendations to Manager, may prepare, advertise,
receive and recommend award bids according to established procedures and oversee projects.
• Communicate with personnel and outside organizations to coordinate activities and programs, resolve
issues and conflicts and exchange information.
• Provide technical expertise, information and assistance to the Manager regarding assigned functions,
assist as needed in the formulation and development of policies, procedures and programs.
• Operate a computer and other office equipment as assigned, maintain current knowledge of plant
instrumentation and control systems, drive a vehicle to various sites to inspect work.
• Attend and conduct a variety of meetings as assigned, represent the City at a variety of meetings.
• Perform related duties as assigned.
Required Knowledge of:
• Maintenance and asset management industry standards.
• Industry standards related to the operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plants.
• Effective and efficient maintenance of wastewater plant assets.
• Permit requirements.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator Packet Pg. 137
4.7.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Wastewater Treatment Program Administrator
• Applicable laws, codes, regulations, policies and procedures related to the operation and maintenance of
wastewater treatment plants.
• Conflict resolution techniques.
• Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy.
• Health and safety standards, rules and regulations.
• Budget preparation and control.
• Labor Relations and contract administration.
• Oral and written communication skills.
• Record keeping techniques.
• Operation of a computer and assigned software.
• Supervisory and training principles, methods and techniques.
Required Skill in:
• Planning, organizing and coordinating the operations and maintenance activities of a municipal Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
• Ensure requirements and permits comply with local, state and federal agencies.
• Supervise and evaluate the performance of assigned staff.
• Evaluating work practices of operations, maintenance and laboratory departments to implement current
industry standards.
• Plan plant projects to allocate staffing, timelines and budget.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing.
• Interpret, apply and explain rules, regulation, policies and procedures.
• Establishing and maintaining cooperative and effective working relationships with others.
• Operate a computer and assigned office equipment.
• Analyze situations accurately and adopt an effective course of action.
• Meet schedules and timelines.
• Work independently with little direction.
• Plan and organize work.
• Preparing and maintaining a variety of comprehensive records, files, and reports.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Bachelor's Degree in Public Administration or Business Administration, or related field and five years of
experience managing and implementing programs or policies developed by others and two years of staff
supervisory responsibility; preferably in a municipal or public sector environment; OR an equivalent combination
of education, training and experience.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
State of Washington Driver's License
CPR and First Aid card, within 6 months of hire
Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check
Other Requirements:
Ability to pass a mandatory drug test upon conditional job offer.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Packet Pg. 138
4.7.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Wastewater Treatment Program Administrator
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Indoor/outdoor work environment
• Driving a vehicle to conduct work
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.
• Operate a variety of grounds equipment and power and hand tools.
• Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Read a variety of materials and possess close vision, far vision, side vision, depth perception, night
vision and color vision.
• Ascending/descending ladders
• Lifting/ carrying or otherwise move or transport heavy objects frequently up to 50lbs.
• Sitting/standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time
• Walking or otherwise moving over rough or uneven surfaces while performing inspections and
investigations.
• Performing repetitive motions, including balancing, stooping, kneeling, bending, crouching, crawling,
reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally, and standing, pushing, pulling and using
stairs.
• Ability to wear appropriate personal protective equipment based on required City Policy.
Hazards:
• Exposure to chemicals, used in Wastewater treatment such as Sodium Hypochlorite, Caustic Soda,
Bisulfate, Polymers, Clay, Lime and Carbon.
• Exposure to raw and treated sewage, odors associated with sewage treatment, high heat and moving
equipment.
• Exposure to cleaning chemicals, herbicides and dust.
• Working at heights using ladders and structures
• Working around and with sometimes noisy machinery having moving parts
• Exposure to slippery surfaces, damp spaces while cleaning in and around equipment.
• Exposure to electrical power supply and high voltage.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
Packet Pg. 139
A*04%00444k 2
4.7.b
2019 CITY OF EDMONDS
SUMMARY
OF BENEFITS - (NON -REPRESENTED) EMPLOYEES
HEALTH INSURANCE:
AWC Regence Healthfirst 250 Plan or
Kaiser Permanente 200 Plan, Family Coverage Available.
Premium cost is paid: 90% - City, 10% - Employee
Family of four - cost to Employee is $181.55 - $216.71**
DENTAL INSURANCE:
Delta Dental Plan - Family Coverage Available ($1500 annual limit)
Reverse Incentive (100% - 70%)
Includes $1000 Orthodontia Rider
Family of four - Employee Cost is $18.40**
VISION INSURANCE:
VSP Plan
Family coverage - $10 deductible
Family of four - Employee cost $2.86**
LIFE INSURANCE:
Basic Term Life - Directors/Managers: Life Insurance equal to annual salary;
Other non -reps: Life Insurance equal to half annual salary; $1,000 on the
dependents. Premium is fully paid by the City. Voluntary buy -up available.
$150,000 - for duty related death - WA State
RETIREMENT:
State Retirement is mandatory - PERS Contribution Rates:
City Employee
PERS II 11.18% 6.12% (7/1/15)
PERS II 12.70% 7.38% (7/1/17)
PERS II 12.83% 7.41% (9/1/18)
MEBT:
Retirement program in lieu of Social Security
Contribution Rate: City and Employee approximately 6.2% each
Includes Long Term Disability & $100,000 life insurance
MEDICARE:
Employees hired after 4/86 pay 1.45%
VACATION:
Director: Shall accrue 22 days a year.
Managers & Directors - 24 hours of management leave per calendar year (not
allowed to be carried over)
Other: No vacation during the first 6 months; after 6 months of continuous
service - 5 days; 1 through 5 years -11 days vacation; 6 through 11 years - 16
days of vacation; 12 through 19 years - 21 days of vacation; 20 through 24 years -
25 days of vacation; beyond 25 years - 27 days of vacation
SICK LEAVE:
Earned at the rate of one working day for each full calendar month of service.
HOLIDAYS:
11 paid holidays per year
457 PLAN:
Employee only contribution - State Plan (DRS), Nationwide, and ICMA
FLEXIBLE SAVINGS
The City offers employee funded (pre-tax) FSA's for daycare,
ACCOUNT:
medical, public transit and parking related costs.
SUPPLEMENTAL
AFLAC offers employee -paid short term disability insurance,
INSURANCE:
cancer insurance, accident insurance and others. Cigna
offers additional, employee -paid supplemental life insurance.
EAP BENEFITS: Employee Assistance Programs offered through AWC and Cigna.
**See reverse side for cost breakdown
This summary is informational and not meant to guarantee benefits. Last revised: 118119 ELW
Packet Pg. 140
4.7.b
2019 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM RATES - MONTHLY
Non -Represented Employees
Employee and Dependents covered at 90%/10%
REGENCE HEALTHFIRST 250 (AWC)
TOTAL
CITY
EMPLOYEE
PAYS
PAYS
GENERAL EMPLOYEE
743.23
668.91
74.32
Spouse
749.46
674.51
74.95
First Child
369.21
332.29
36.92
Second Child
305.23
274.71
30.52
KAISER PERMANENTE 200 (AWC)
TOTAL
CITY
EMPLOYEE
PAYS
PAYS
GENERAL EMPLOYEE
607.80
547.02
60.78
Spouse
597.66
537.89
59.77
First Child
304.98
274.48
30.50
Second Child
304.98
274.48
30.50
DENTAL BENEFITS
TOTAL
CITY
EMPLOYEE
PAYS
PAYS
PLAN - F Plus ORTHODONTIA III
GENERAL EMPLOYEE
56.02
50.42
5.60
EMPLOYEE + 1
106.68
96.01
10.67
EMPLOYEE + 2 or more
183.99
165.59
18.40
VISION BENEFITS
TOTAL
CITY
EMPLOYEE
PAYS
PAYS
$10.00 Deductible
GENERAL EMPLOYEE
9.54
8.59
0.95
EMPLOYEE + 1
19.06
17.15
1.91
EMPLOYEE + 2 or more
28.58
25.72
2.86
"note that amounts deducted from paychecks may differ slightly due to system rounding.
Packet Pg. 141
4.7.c
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
CITY OF EDMONDS
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of
Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and Michael U.
Derrick (hereinafter "Employee") for employment services relating to the City's
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
WHEREAS, the City requires the services of a Program Administrator to
implement various programs and tasks in support of the Division; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to employ the Employee as the Wastewater
Treatment Plant Program Administrator pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City to establish certain terms of
employment and working conditions of the Employee; and
WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that the Employee will serve at the
pleasure of the Mayor, and that nothing herein is intended to modify the
Employee's at -will status; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Employee to accept the contract position
of Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator for the City under
the terms provided herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Employee do hereby enter into this
Employment Agreement for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Program
Administrator position under the terms set forth below. The Employee's
employment will be governed exclusively by the provisions of this
Agreement, unless otherwise provided herein.
1. Term of Employment: This Agreement will take effect August 1, 2019 and will
expire on July 31, 2020 unless extended pursuant to its terms. Thereafter, this Agreement
may be extended for an unlimited number of terms of one (1) calendar year duration at
the sole discretion of the City. The purpose of this term is to permit an annual review of
the performance of the Employee and to re-evaluate the efficacy of the position by the
City in order to determine whether it is appropriate to renew this Agreement for an
additional term.
Packet Pg. 142
4.7.c
2
2019 Employment Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
2. Duties: The duties of the Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
position are outlined in Attachment 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3. Hours of Work: The Employee will work office hours as assigned and directed
by the Public Works Director and/or the Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager. Such
hours may normally be worked between 5:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., with occasional evening
and weekend meetings or phone responses. It is anticipated that the Employee will work
an average or 40 hours per week performing the afore -mentioned duties at an average of
approximately 8 — 9 hours per day. Actual hours may vary from week to week,
depending on programs, activities and events occurring or scheduled in any particular
month, but should average 40 hours per week over time.
4. Wages and Benefits: The wages for services under this Agreement will be based
on the annual salary of $98,129, plus benefits. The City will pay the applicable
employer's portion of. Medicare; Washington State Paid Family & Medical Leave
premiums; PERS retirement; and any employer contributions into Social Security,
Washington State Industrial Taxes, and such other payments or benefits as may be
required under the provisions of state and federal law based upon the number of hours
worked (the same as for the other non -represented employees).
4.1 Benefits Generally: The benefits to be paid to the Employee will be based
upon the 2019 City of Edmonds Non -Represented Employees benefit schedule set forth
in Attachment 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
5. Termination of Agreement: The parties acknowledge that this Employment
Agreement creates an at -will employment relationship that may be terminated at any
time, with or without cause, by either party. This paragraph will control and supersede
any portion of this Agreement that might otherwise be construed as in any way altering
the Employee's at -will status.
6. Indemnification: As an employee of the City, the Employee will have the right to
indemnification by and on behalf of the City for actions taken in the scope of his
employment in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2.06 of the Edmonds City
Code it currently exists or is hereafter amended.
7. Entire Written Agreement: This document represents the entire agreement between
the parties. No representation or other written or oral agreement by either party will
survive the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement will be amended only upon the
express written agreement of both parties.
Packet Pg. 143
3
4.7.c
2019 Employment Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Plant Program Administrator
8. Severability: The provisions of this Agreement are severable. In the event that any
provision hereof is held to be void, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions
will survive; PROVIDED, however, that in the event the provisions of paragraph 5,
relating to this Agreement being one of at -will employment, are held to be unenforceable,
invalid, or void, this Agreement will immediately be at an end.
DONE THIS day of July 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS: EMPLOYEE:
David O. Earling, Mayor Michael U. Derrick
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Packet Pg. 144
4.8
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Probation Officer Court Position
Staff Lead: Uneek Maylor
Department: Municipal Court
Preparer: Uneek Maylor
Background/History
This item was approved by Public Safety, Personnel and Planning Committee to be added to the consent
agenda for Council approval.
Staff Recommendation
The court currently has a vacant Court Clerk (NE-7) position. Instead of filling that current position, we
are requesting to add an additional Probation Officer (NE-10) position. The cost of adding a second
probation officer would be $56,148.00 annually. However, the overall impact to the Court's budget
would be less than that because we will not be filling the current vacant clerk's position. The clerk's
position salary is $47,280.00 and annual benefits are already budgeted for this year. Thus, the overall
difference is $8,868.00.
Narrative
The court currently has a vacant Court Clerk (NE-7) position. Instead of filling that current position, we
are requesting to add an additional Probation Officer (NE-10) position. Our current stats from filings that
were presented in the State of the Court Report in the March 2019 presentation, indicated a 12%
increase in DUI filings. Our filings have increased with the one case type that utilizes pretrial monitoring
the most based on the required conditions of pretrial release for the state of Washington.
We have made the decision to add pretrial monitoring for several reasons. First, it complies with our
State Constitution requirement of presumption of release, while also setting monitoring conditions that
take into account community safety. Second, it allows defendants to be proactive and obtain their
substance -abuse assessments and begin treatment earlier. Third, it is cost efficient by reducing
unnecessary jail costs.
As previously discussed in the Court's State of the Court report, according to the Washington State
Auditors' report, if local authorities across the state released all 2,300 lower -risk defendants through
pretrial services, savings would total more than $6.1 million annually. If they also released the 2,400
higher -risk defendants through pretrial services, taxpayers would save an additional $6.4 million
annually.
Edmonds is the only city in the surrounding area that is currently providing pretrial services monitoring
by our probation officer on their caseload. Pretrial services may include regular office check -ins,
monitoring abstinence, service or treatment referrals, and court date reminders. Below is our
comparable cities' current caseload for probation officers.
Bothell - active probation cases 1173- 2 probation officers; ratio is 1 to 586.5
Issaquah - active probation cases 709 - 1 probation officer; ratio is 1 to 709
Packet Pg. 145
4.8
Olympia - active probation cases 1294 - 4 probation officers; ratio is 1 to 323.5
Edmonds - active probation cases 939 - 1 probation officer; ratio is 1 to 939
The cost of adding a second probation officer would be $56,148.00 annually. However, the overall
impact to the Court's budget would be less than that because we will not be filling the current vacant
clerk's position. The clerk's position salary is $47,280.00 and annual benefits are already budgeted for
this year. Thus, the overall difference is $8,868.00. However, it is important to remember that the
increase in pretrial services will result in a savings of jail costs. As noted in the Court's annual report,
pretrial services saved the City more than $20,832 in jail costs as it related to one defendant, who also
was able to get a substance abuse evaluation and begin treatment.
The Court is able to not fill the current clerk's position because we have gone live with phase one of our
paperless project. This has allowed more efficiency in enough tasks that we are able to absorb the clerk
duties among existing staff. However, in order to continue with our paperless project, we need to add a
probation officer so that we can manage our work load and still allow the staffing time necessary to
focus on transitioning the rest of the Court's processes to be paperless, which is currently on hold until
we are able to stabilize our staffing needs. Phase one only covered a small portion of the Court's work,
written hearings requests for infractions and jury management.
Attachments:
Court —Clerk
Probation Officer
Packet Pg. 146
4.8.a
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
COURT CLERK
Department:
Municipal Court
Pay Grade:
NE-7
Bargaining Unit:
SEIU
FLSA Status:
Non Exempt
Revised Date:
October 2012
Reports To:
Court Administrator
POSITION PURPOSE: Under general supervision, performs a wide variety of legal and clerical duties in support
of the Municipal Court; communicates information to the public regarding the judicial systems; processes and
documents court cases from date of filing to final disposition; assists the Judge during legal proceedings and
establishes positive working relationship with attorneys, law enforcements agencies and other government
entities.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all
employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities.
Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional,
position -specific duties.
• Prepares and processes all assigned court work in a timely manner ensuring accuracy and
completeness of information and attending to deadlines and/or specified timelines.
• Assigns cases to docket and enters the case data into case management system.
• Ensures court rules and procedures are followed as cases are processed and sets schedules,
arraignments, hearings and trials.
• Prepares and mails out documents such as notices and final orders.
• Tracks cases to ensure compliance with case type and sentencing requirements and follows through
with necessary steps including: orders to show cause, bench warrants, pleadings, and rule extensions.
• Maintains warrant control, issues, recalls, processes, and purges warrants.
• Coordinates with law enforcement agencies regarding warrant status and the recovery of original
warrants in order to protect defendants within multiple jurisdictions against potential false arrest.
• Processes closing of cases when appropriate.
• Receipts and distributes all incoming monies and balances and reconciles daily cash receipts and files
receipt of fees into appropriate case file.
• Reviews various reports and issues failure to appear notices and other related notices.
• Refers recall cases to collections, writes off amounts past statute and waives balances for parking early
payments; processes letters to Judge regarding cases in collections and mails responses.
• Performs duties mandated by domestic Violence Legislation under the Revised Code of Washington
(RCW) and Washington State Rules of Court which includes set hearings within 24 hours, prepares
certified No -Contact Orders; ensures order is accurate and signed by defendant.
• Delivers and/or provides a certified copy of order to law enforcement, SNO COM and the victim; enters
order correctly into JIS computer system; notifies the Domestic Violence Advocate of any potential
hearings regarding the order.
• Provides general information and customer assistance at the counter or via telephone to attorneys, law
enforcement, other judicial agencies, reporters, defendants and the general public.
Court Clerk Packet Pg. 147
4.8.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Court Clerk
• Addresses concerns and questions for all who come to the front counter and assists defendants in
navigating through the legal process.
• Reviews the defendant's case financial history for reconciliation to sentencing penalty.
• Maintains and files documents into case files; copies, faxes, date stamps and files documents.
• May prepare exhibits and hard copy case files.
• Processes and distributes mail.
• Files case documents in appropriate file destination and enters into case management system; provides
backup to other court personnel as needed or directed.
• Researches files for case status data and provides accurate information.
• Sets assigned calendars and ensures judicial calendars are maintained.
• Completes all phases of juror notification including: preparing, mailing and processing replies to juror
questionnaires.
• Readies juror pool and monitors jurors on the day of the trial; sets up and prepares courtroom for
hearings including computer and recording equipment set-up and assembling calendars for all parties to
ensure files are available for the Judge.
• Researches and processes public records requests.
• Cross trains in other court services areas as assigned and may serve in other related capacities in
support of court services; coordinates and schedules meetings.
• Communicates with various outside agencies by phone or mail including: Lynnwood Jail, Snohomish
County Jail, DUI victims' panel and other agencies.
• Performs general filing duties including criminal and infraction files and miscellaneous paperwork
developed during court proceedings.
• Reviews jail rosters and refer cases to the Judge for review and docket decision.
• Assists with other miscellaneous duties such as assisting with and executing passports.
• Orders and monitors office supplies; drafts and mails letters to defendants, audits citations/tickets and
drafts explanatory documents for defendants.
Required Knowledge of:
• Operational characteristics, services, and activities of municipal court systems, including accounting
principles and practices related to work assigned.
• Mathematical knowledge sufficient to operate cash drawer and make calculations and process
transactions.
• Filing systems and coding methods including: alphabetical, numeric, indexing methods, etc.
• Principles and practices of court proceedings, judicial process and associated forms.
• Legal forms, documents and terminology including: court dockets, driving abstracts and defendant case
history.
• Principles and processes for providing customer services including needs assessment techniques,
quality service and customer satisfaction techniques.
• City policies and procedures, office organization, practices, correspondence and record keeping
systems.
• Effective communication principles and practices including oral and written communication as well as
public relations and customer service.
• Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications
such as: word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases.
• Methods and techniques of proper phone etiquette.
• English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
• Principles of business letter writing.
Court Clerk
Packet Pg. 148
4.8.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Court Clerk
Required Skill in:
• Reading and comprehending court legal mandates, codes, regulations, procedures and instructions.
• Performing data entry accurately and efficiently.
• Making decisions in accordance with precedents and regulations and to apply them to work situations.
• Recording court proceedings, setting a variety of hearing dates and performing other duties in the
courtroom.
• Preparing courtroom calendars and the equipment necessary to comply with court rules.
• Public relations and customer service and ability to work with difficult clients.
• Performing general office/clerical tasks.
• Interpreting and implementing rules, regulations, policies and procedures related to court proceedings
and judicial process.
• Comprehending legal terminology and court/judicial proceedings.
• Typing and entering data at a speed necessary for successful job performance.
• Compiling and preparing required reports.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations and customer service.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with employees, other agencies, and the
public, including meeting and dealing tactfully with the public.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work and
in compiling and preparing spreadsheets.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
High School Diploma/GED Certification and three years of experience performing broad office clerical, data
processing, records maintenance, and/or customer service counter work that includes heavy customer service,
reviewing and tracking a variety of legal documents, preparing reports and calendars, and receiving and
processing fees; preferably in a court or legal setting; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and
experience.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
Some positions may be required to possess or obtain a US Department of State Passport Certification within 3
months after hire.
Must be able to successfully complete and pass background check.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office and courtroom environment.
• Constant interruptions.
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person and on the telephone
• Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Reading and understanding a variety of materials.
• Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise
positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Sitting or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 101bs.
Hazards:
Court Clerk
Packet Pg. 149
4.8.a
JOB DESCRIPTION
Court Clerk
• Contact with dissatisfied or potentially abusive individuals.
• Possible exposure to communicable diseases and illness from defendants and others in the courtroom,
and court office.
Incumbent Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Q
Court Clerk
Packet Pg. 150
4.8.b
City of
EDMONDS
Washington
PROBATION OFFICER
Department:
Municipal Court
Pay Grade:
NE-10
Bargaining Unit:
SEIU
FLSA Status:
Non Exempt
Revised Date:
October 2012
Reports To:
Court Administrator
POSITION PURPOSE: Under general direction, provides professional probation services for misdemeanant
offenders; performs case management duties; meets with probationers to discuss progress; provides
counseling; writes reports and correspondence; monitors pretrial release conditions, community service,
electronic home monitoring and jail; resolves conflicts; assures compliance with the order of the court; preserves
public safety; reduces recidivism; and serves as liaison between court and the probationer. Conducts pre -
sentence investigations, client evaluation, counseling and referrals, and coordinates and monitors client
community service, and treatment programs; supervise and evaluate the performance of assigned personnel.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all
employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities.
Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional,
position -specific duties.
• During the Court Administrator's absence, oversees office functions and verifies that tasks are achieved.
• Resolves technical issues with input from the judge; makes effective suggestions and
recommendations.
• Conducts pre/post sentence investigations with face to face interviews and extensive research that
includes but is not limited to: criminal history, contact with victims, personal history, social and economic
needs, community resource needs, counseling/treatment needs, work history, family and employer
support and complete written pre -post sentence reports which includes sentencing recommendations.
• Prepares defendant's non-compliance reports for upcoming court hearing making copies for Judge,
Prosecutor, and Defendant's Attorney.
• Files reports in criminal file for court hearing.
• Meets with defendants from court to discuss pretrial release or sentencing conditions.
• After court hearing meets with defendants to go over court paperwork and provides assistance in
completing court requirements.
• Sets up probation appointments; and meets with defendants to review defendant's progress/non
progress.
• Responds to phone calls from defendants on probation.
• Checks the jail list daily for defendants released from custody while monitoring defendant's daily
compliance thru probation appointments, treatment reports, ignition interlock reports and review of their
case history.
• Monitors all cases Judge sets on pretrial release conditions and reviews the conditions and completes
appropriate paperwork.
• Reviews all judgment and sentencing paperwork submitted to probation from the court clerk after the
hearing.
Probation Officer Packet Pg. 151
4.8.b
JOB DESCRIPTION
Probation Officer
• Reviews plea and sentence screen (PLS) to ensure conditions are set for tracking thru the use of the
case review screen (CRS) that orders reports and tracks probation conditions ordered by the court;
coordinates a review hearing for non-compliance conditions as needed.
• Receives and reviews daily assessments for compliance and updates PLS with level of treatment
required from assessment; coordinates review hearing for non-compliance with sentencing conditions
as needed.
• Orders case review reports on a monthly basis for various alcohol, drug, mental health and other
assessment and treatments and all other related assessment requirements for review of
compliance/non-compliance.
• Receives regular case review lists that verifies if defendants have new cites or cites that violate their
probation conditions; coordinates review hearings as needed; dockets on the case and prepares
probation violation report for the prosecutor, defense attorney and file copy.
• Tracks and monitors community service hours, electronic monitoring and jail and if violations have
occurred, writes up jail commitment and submits paperwork to the Judge.
• Reviews daily case review report for probation closures and processes closures if appropriate. Reviews
for non-compliance prior to closure date.
• Completes appropriate paperwork including deferred sentence and deferred prosecution dismissal
orders.
• Pulls criminal files, attaches orders and forwards files to the judge to review on probation conditions and
set a hearing date.
• Represents the probation office in the Misdemeanor Probation Association, serving on various task
forces and other committees as appropriate.
• Provides testimony in court as required.
• Maintains all applicable certification requirements and keeps current on changing codes and
probationary practices through continuing education (seminars, classes, meetings) and reading of
applicable journals.
• Prepares probation mailing including notice of case setting for non-compliance and letters to defendants
for their probation appointments. As needed, processes Interstate Compact for Adult Supervision
(ICAOS) ensuring compliance with rules and regulation for transferring defendants that fall under the
ICAOS; and fills out paperwork and submits to the Department of Corrections for the State of
Washington.
Required Knowledge of:
• Criminal justice system, courtroom policies, procedures and practices, legal forms, documents and
terminology.
• Procedures, structure and applicable local, state and federal laws, municipal codes, regulations and
ordinances.
• Legal, ethical, and professional rules of conduct.
• The court order process.
• Principles of human behavior.
• Principles and practices of case and records management.
• Basic principles of accounting and record keeping.
• Legal terminology and court processes and procedures.
• Community resources and services.
• Effective oral and written communication principles and practices.
• Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications such as
word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases.
Probation Officer
Packet Pg. 152
4.8.b
JOB DESCRIPTION
Probation Officer
• English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
• Principles of business letter writing.
Required Skill in:
• Personal interactions, counseling and interviewing.
• Interacting with people of different social, economic, and ethnic backgrounds and positively directing the
activities of clients.
• Communicating with clients, recognizing suspicious behavior patterns and mediating difficult situations.
• Utilizing positive reinforcement strategies to promote the intrinsic change in the probationer's behavior.
• Exhibiting good officer judgment, and applying pertinent statues and rules to written recommendations.
• Understanding the purposes and responsibilities of the court system.
• Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work and in
compiling and preparing spreadsheets.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside
agencies, community groups and the general public.
• Communicating effectively verbally and in writing, including public relations.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Education and Experience:
Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice, Behavioral or Social Sciences, Sociology, Psychology or related field and
two years of experience in the criminal justice, social work, or similar field that includes caseload management,
direct client services, and assessment and referral to rehabilitations/alternative sentencing programs.
Counseling skills necessary to evaluate and act on offender crisis, assess offender needs, motivate offenders,
and make recommendations to the court; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience.
Required Licenses or Certifications:
Misdemeanant Probation Certificate within six (6) months of employment as required by WAC 139-10-210
Must be able to successfully complete and pass background check.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
Environment:
• Office, and courtroom environment
• Constant interruptions
Physical Abilities:
• Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person and on the telephone
• Operate a computer keyboard or other office equipment.
• Read and understand a variety of materials
• Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise
positioning oneself to accomplish tasks.
• Sitting or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.
• Lifting/carrying or otherwise move or transport up to 101bs.
Probation Officer
Packet Pg. 153
4.8.b
JOB DESCRIPTION
Probation Officer
Hazards:
• Contact with dissatisfied, potentially abusive or mentally handicapped individuals
• Possible exposure to communicable diseases and illness from defendants and others in the courtroom,
and court office.
Incumbent Signature:
Department Head:
Date:
Date:
Probation Officer
Packet Pg. 154
4.9
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Approve Contract for Jerrie Bevington
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
At the 7/9/19 City Council Finance Committee meeting and the Planning, Public Safety and Personnel
Committee, Jerrie Bevington's Audio/Video Recording contract with an hourly rate increase was
discussed and the committees requested that this item be moved to the consent agenda.
Hourly rate request: $34
Current hourly rate: $33
Jerrie Bevington generally works approximately 15+ hours per month.
Effective dates: 1/1/19 - 12/31/20 which will include back pay to January 1, 2019.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
Bevington Employment Agreement 2019
Packet Pg. 155
4.9.a
Employment Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the Parties, Jerrie
Bevington (now "Employee") and the City of Edmonds, Washington (now "City") to
describe the terms and conditions of Employee's employment as Administrative
Assistant in Charge of AudioNideo Recording to City Council.
WHEREAS, the City desires to employ the services of Employee as an Administrative
Assistant, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City to establish certain terms of employment and
to set working conditions of Employee; and
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the
Parties agree as follows:
1. Term of Employment
Employee's employment with the City shall commence on January 1, 2019, and last
for a period of two (2) years unless the term of this Agreement is modified by mutual
agreement of the Parties.
2. Qualifications
Employee affirms that she possesses the ability to set up and use the City's recording
equipment to properly record the City Council meetings.
3. Duties
Set up and use the City's video recording equipment to record City Council meetings,
as well as, Planning Board Meetings.
4. Wages and Hours
Employee shall be paid, for the performance of the above duties, at the rate of $34.00
per hour and paid in periodic installments consistent with the City's normal payroll
procedures.
Packet Pg. 156
4.9.a
5. Benefits
As this is a part-time, contract position, the Employee will not be eligible for DRC
(PERS) or MEBT membership or any regular employee benefits including leaves
(vacation, holiday or sick leave pay or accruals).
6. Termination
Employee is employed at -will, and the Mayor may remove Employee from the
position at the City of Edmonds' City Council Office and terminate her employment
at any time, with or without cause.
7. Indemnification
Employer shall defend and indemnify Employee as set forth in Edmonds Municipal
Code (now "EMC") 2.06, or any amendment thereof, with respect to claims and/or
litigation resulting from any conduct, acts, or omissions arising from the scope or course
of Employee's service to or employment with the City.
8. Entire Agreement/Modification/Severability
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes
any other agreements, oral or written. This Agreement may be amended or modified
only with the written concurrence of the Parties. If any clause, section, sentence, or
provision of this Agreement is ultimately held invalid by a court or tribunal of
competent jurisdiction, such invalidation shall not affect the validity of any other
clause, section, sentence, or provision in the Agreement.
9. Notices
Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given, by deposit in the custody of the
United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
City of Edmonds:
Office of the Mayor
City of Edmonds
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Packet Pg. 157
4.9.a
Employee:
Jerrie Bevington
411 6ch Ave. N. # 1
Edmonds, WA 98020
10.Opportunity to Confer with Independent Counsel
In signing below, Employee expressly represents and affirms that the City Attorney
was not acting as Employee's counsel in drafting this Agreement and that Employee
had the opportunity to consult with independent counsel in reviewing and deciding to
execute this Agreement.
DONE THIS day of July 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS:
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Jerrie Bevington, Employee
Packet Pg. 158
5.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Students Saving Salmon Yearly Council Report 2019
Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead}
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
The Council continues to support Students Saving Salmon (SSS) with funds in the budget and through
the Council Contingency Fund. In November 2018, the Council approved $15,000 from 2018 Contingency
Funds to pay for 2019 water quality quarterly testing. Every year for the last four years the group has
presented a report to the City Council on the results of their stream/marsh monitoring and surveys.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Students Saving Salmon members learn about the watershed in Edmonds with the goal of reestablishing
historic salmon runs in Edmonds and making our local environment better for people and salmon.
Students have been conducting field studies and participating in the City Government process and
community enhancement efforts through creating informational materials, writing news articles,
participating in town hall and City Council meetings, and being part of the Edmonds Water Quality
Monitoring Program, known as the "Edmonds Stream Team." Edmonds-Woodway High School Science
Teacher Dave Millette, Meadowdale High School Teacher Dianne Thompson, and retired NOAA Fisheries
Biologist Joe Scordino have lent countless volunteer hours to educating and working with the Students.
In addition to Stream Team water testing, Students Saving Salmon have a "Shell Creek Salmon
Stewardship" project to improve salmon abundance and habitat in the lower portions of Shell Creek
where both coho and chum salmon are known to spawn each year. The work started with door-to-door
surveys by students in October 2016 to collect "local knowledge" on salmon occurrence and initiate
student surveys of stream conditions and salmon presence/absence. Students also worked with private
property owners to restore streamside habitat with the planting of over 600 native plants at multiple
residences and at Holy Rosary Church over the past two years.
Students Saving Salmon helped raise coho fry at the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery in Edmonds and
then released over 1,000 of the coho fry into the upper areas of Shell Creek each year to enhance the
salmon population. The student's salmon enhancement effort has progressed to using "hatchboxes"
(instream salmon egg incubators) to rear coho and chum salmon fry in upper Shell Creek and lower
Lunds Gulch Creek.
Links to the Students Saving Salmon Activities:
Packet Pg. 159
5.1
5/21/19 -Students Saving Salmon release juvenile coho into Shell Creek
https://mvedmondsnews.com/2019/05/students-saving-salmon-release-juvenile-coho-into-shell-creek/
3/24/19 Students Saving Salmon and friends restore Shell Creek habitat
<https://myedmondsnews.com/20l9/O3/scene-in-edmonds-students-saving-salmon-and-friends-
restore-shell-creek-habitat/>
2/8/19 - Olympic Fly Fishers donate to Students Saving Salmon club
<https://mvedmondsnews.com/2019/02/olympic-flv-fishers-donate-to-students-saving-salmon-club/>
1/14/19 - Students Saving Salmon help restore local salmon populations
<https://myedmondsnews.com/2019/01/students-saving-salmon-help-restore-local-salmon-
populations/>
Meet the Stream Team
Facebook site - Students Saving Salmon -Edmonds Stream Team
<https://www.facebook.com/Students-Saving-Salmon-Edmonds-Stream-Team-1094875650565724/>
Attachments:
2019 Stream Team Report
Packet Pg. 160
5.1.a
REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF EDMONDS STREAMS/MARSH
AND SALMON STEWARDSHIP ACTIVITIES IN 2018/19
REPORT TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
July 2019
EWHS - STUDENTS SAVING SALMON
EDMONDS STREAM TEAM
Joe Scordino, Advisor and Stream Team Project Leader.
Erin Francisco, Ava Wilson, Elena Sta. Maria, Miriam Gold, Grace Yockey, Aimee Fuji,
Mackey Guenther, Nick Sibiryakov, Hannah Wechsler, Dara Stotland, Kaiona Apio, Katrina
Peterson, Alexandra Siecke, Matthew Jack, Emma Gibson, Alyssa Barnett, Ainsley Powell, Evan
Grey, Elizabeth Yockey, Cindy Tran, Jonghyun Kim, River Freeburg, Tomoe Millette, Hannah
Nguyen, Aaron Kim, Mojiza Baig, Alban Vukaj, Emma Sturgill, Rachael Hoang, Elizabeth
Adams, Sasha Gilster, Nikolas Faulkner, and Emma D'cessare - EWHS Students.
David Millette, James Ogren - EWHS Teachers; Dianne Thompson - Meadowdale High Teacher
Peggy Foreman, Nancy Scordino, Greg Ferguson and Pat Johnson - Community Volunteers
Packet Pg. 161
5.1.a
INTRODUCTION
This report provides an update on the activities and findings of the Edmonds Woodway
High School's (EWHS) Students Saving Salmon club involvement in the Edmonds Stream Team
and salmon stewardship in Edmonds. Details on methodology and other aspects of the ongoing
monitoring project are provided in prior year reports to the Edmonds City Council [see: Edmonds
Water Quality Monitoring Project: Preliminary Report, 2016]. This report also provides
recommendations, based on four years of monthly observations, for improvements to the
Edmonds Marsh and local streams to enhance aquatic habitats for salmon, wildlife, and/or other
aquatic organisms.
BACKGROUND
Students Saving Salmon is an Edmonds-Woodway High School club formed by students
concerned about the environment, especially salmon and their habitat. Students Saving Salmon
objectives are to collect and disseminate scientific information on Edmonds watersheds and local
salmon populations; conduct community outreach; improve streamside habitat; and enhance
salmon populations.
Since the start of the 2015/16 school year, EWHS students have conducted monthly
stream monitoring with the Edmonds Stream Team, a citizen science project led by Joe Scordino
(a retired fishery biologist) to assess stream water quality and habitat in Edmonds. Meadowdale
High School students joined the Stream Team in the 2017/18 school year. The purpose of the
citizen science project is to advance our knowledge and understanding of the local environment.
Students used electronic instruments to obtain water quality measurements and document habitat
conditions at 23 sites in local streams (Shell, Willow, Shellabarger, Hindley, Perrinville, and
Lunds Gulch Creeks) and from the Edmonds Marsh.
Scientific information is collected every month on habitat conditions and water
parameters that are important for aquatic organism survival including temperature, pH, dissolved
oxygen, salinity, turbidity and nutrients. Water samples are collected periodically for analysis at
an accredited laboratory in Everett for heavy metals and petroleum compounds, and for fecal
coliform analysis at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Lab. This Citizen Science project is
designed to provide baseline stream quality data that can be used to characterize individual
stream conditions, evaluate temporal and spatial trends, and detect human perturbations or
environmental factors.
EWHS and Meadowdale students are also involved with salmon stewardship activities
throughout the year including stream surveys, streamside habitat restoration, outreach, salmon
hatchery work, and other salmon enhancement efforts.
2
Packet Pg. 162
5.1.a
WATER QUALITY IN STREAMS AND EDMONDS MARSH
The Edmonds Stream Team has collected data on multiple water quality parameters; but
to ensure brevity in this report, we are only reporting our findings on the principal parameters
affecting aquatic life (i.e., water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH).
Water Temperature in Creeks
Water temperatures in the creeks were generally good for salmon year-round (Table 1).
All monthly water temperatures, except one, were below the maximum temperature requirement
of 63.5 °F for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration [Washington Administrative Code -
WAC 173-201A-200(1)(c)]. The one exceedance was 63.8°F in Hindley Creek in August 2017.
Table 1. Seasonal Water Temperatures in Creeks (in degrees Fahrenheit)
fall
Spring
summer
winter
average
Lower Shell Creek
51.1
52.7
56.1
47.2
51.5
Middle Shell Creek
50.7
52.0
54.5
47.2
51.0
Upper Shell Creek
51.0
51.6
53.1
47.2
50.8
Lower Hindley Creek
52.5
55.1
60.5
47.2
53.3
Lower Shellabarger Creek
53.8
55.9
60.8
47.5
54.4
Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle fork
53.0
56.3
59.3
48.7
54.4
Shellabarger Creek - Upper north fork
52.6
55.5
58.0
49.2
53.7
Shellabarger Creek - Upper south fork
53.1
55.2
59.1
47.6
53.8
Lower Willow Creek
51.8
52.3
57.9
46.1
52.4
Upper Willow Creek
53.5
53.2
56.7
50.3
53.4
Lower Perrinville Creek
51.5
52.3
- -
44.5
49.4
Upper Perrinville Creek
52.5
52.1
- -
48.3
51.1
Lower Lunds Gulch Creek
49.0
50.6
56.1
58.8
56.6
Middle Lunds Gulch Creek
48.0
51.8
58.8
41.5
49.1
Upper Lunds Gulch Creek
47.7
50.9
56.6
40.8
47.4
Water Temperature in Edmonds Marsh
Seasonal averages (Table 2) were above the maximum temperature requirement of
63.5°F for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration [WAC 173-201A-200(1)(c)] every summer
monitored. Outgoing Marsh water exceeded maximum temperature requirements every summer
in spite of cooler incoming freshwater that was below maximum temperature in all months
except in August 2017 when incoming Shellabarger Marsh flow was 67.0°F. The highest water
temperatures recorded at the Marsh outlet was 73.3 °F.
3
Packet Pg. 163
5.1.a
Table 2. Seasonal Water Temperatures in Edmonds Marsh (in degrees Fahrenheit)
fall
scaring
summer
winter
average
East edge at storm drain
51.7
53.0
60.6
45.7
53.2
Eastern edge
52.9
53.1
60.1
47.0
53.0
Eastern edge at Hwy 104 Culvert
52.9
55.6
60.6
47.0
54.2
Northwest corner
53.3
57.9
70.3
45.7
54.8
North edge - Harbor Square east culvert
53.9
56.8
67.3
45.7
56.2
North edge - Harbor Square west culvert
53.8
57.3
67.4
45.5
56.0
Northeast edge
49.5
54.0
- -
44.6
47.9
Marsh outlet at RR tracks
51.9
62.2
65.2
44.7
55.4
Dissolved Oxygen in Creeks
All of the creeks, except upper/middle Lunds Gulch, had dissolved oxygen levels (Table
3) at or above the 8.0 mg/L minimum requirement for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration
[WAC 173-201A-200(1)(d)]. All of the creeks monitored originate from natural springs that
flow year-round except in upper Lunds Gulch Creek. Upper Lunds Gulch Creek goes dry or
stops flowing in the summer resulting in low dissolved oxygen levels in the standing water.
Dissolved oxygen levels in lower Shell Creek, where salmon spawn in fall and winter, were
above 11.0 mg/L which is an optimum level for salmon eggs in the gravel.
Table 3. Seasonal Dissolved Oxygen in Creeks (in mg/L)
fall
Spring
summer
winter
average
Lower Shell Creek
11.1
10.9
10.5
11.6
11.1
Middle Shell Creek
11.2
11.0
10.8
11.7
11.2
Upper Shell Creek
9.7
10.1
9.9
10.6
10.0
Lower Hindley Creek
10.6
10.5
9.7
11.5
10.6
Lower Shellabarger Creek
10.2
10.0
9.4
11.2
10.2
Shellabarger Creek - Upper middle fork
10.8
10.3
10.0
11.4
10.6
Shellabarger Creek - Upper north fork
10.3
10.3
10.0
10.8
10.4
Shellabarger Creek - Upper south fork
10.0
10.0
9.4
11.0
10.1
Lower Willow Creek
10.8
10.4
9.8
11.5
10.5
Upper Willow Creek
10.2
10.4
10.1
10.7
10.4
Lower Perrinville Creek
11.2
11.2
- -
12.4
11.6
Upper Perrinville Creek
9.6
9.8
- -
10.1
9.8
Lower Lunds Gulch Creek
11.4
11.1
10.3
12.7
11.4
Middle Lunds Gulch Creek
10.4
9.7
6.8
12.2
10.1
Upper Lunds Gulch Creek
7.6
8.2
6.1
10.8
8.6
Dissolved Oxygen in Edmonds Marsh
The main flow of water through the Edmonds Marsh (from Willow Creek and the
Shellabarger Marsh inlet at the Hwy 104 culverts to the Marsh outlet) had dissolved oxygen
Packet Pg. 164
5.1.a
averaging over 8.4 mg/L at the outlet (Table 4) which exceeds the 6.5 mg/L minimum
requirement for salmonid rearing and migration [WAC 173-201A-200(1)(d)]. The lowest
dissolved oxygen measurement at the Marsh outlet was 6.7 mg/L in July 2017.
However, dissolved oxygen measured on the northern edge of the Marsh (along Harbor
Square) and the eastern edge of the Marsh (along Highway 104) were below the WAC
requirement in all months (Table 4). The northern edge of the Marsh along Harbor Square
averaged 2.5 mg/L of dissolved oxygen over all months, and was frequently below 2.0 mg/L
(which is lethal to most aquatic organisms) except during periods of rainfall. We do not have
data for the southern edge of the Marsh because Chevron has denied access to their property.
Table 4. Seasonal Dissolved Oxygen in Edmonds Marsh (in mg/L)
fall
spring
summer
winter
average
East edge at storm drain
2.2
2.1
0.9
1.9
1.7
Eastern edge
3.8
3.3
2.1
4.9
3.6
Eastern edge at Hwy 104 Culvert
9.2
9.0
8.3
10.3
9.2
Northwest corner
4.2
2.1
1.0
3.5
2.8
North edge - Harbor Square east culvert
3.6
0.7
0.9
2.9
2.0
North edge - Harbor Square west culvert
4.3
1.6
1.1
4.0
2.8
Northeast edge
2.7
5.0
- -
1.5
2.5
Marsh outlet at RR tracks
8.4
10.3
8.7
10.0
9.3
pH
All of the observed pH levels in the creeks were within the pH 6.5 to 8.5 range required
for salmonid spawning, rearing and migration [WAC 173-201A-200(1)(g)] except for upper
Lunds Gulch Creek which had a pH of 6.4 and 6.3 in October of 2017 and 2018 respectively.
The average pH was 7.6 in all creeks (excluding upper Lunds Gulch).
The Edmonds Marsh had an average pH of 6.9 for all sites with the outgoing water
averaging 7.2. Measured pH was below the minimum 6.5 pH requirement [WAC 173-201A-
200(1)(g)] on multiple occasions on the northern and eastern edges of the Marsh where water
circulation is poor.
Salinity in Edmonds Marsh
The salinity of the water in the Marsh is affected by a tidegate located downstream of the
Marsh outlet. The tidegate functions to prevent saltwater intrusion into the Marsh from mid -
October to mid -March (to prevent potential flooding during periods of coinciding high rainfall
and high tides). In about mid -March, the tidegate is secured in an open position to allow full
tidal exchange of saltwater through the spring/summer months.
The salinity measurements at the Marsh outlet (which is representative of the main body
of the Marsh) from December to early March reflect the low salinity of the incoming freshwater
(averaging 0.11 ppt) from the Shellabarger inlet and lower Willow Creek. When the tide gate is
secured open and saltwater enters the Marsh with each high tide, the salinity measurements are
significantly greater at the Marsh outlet.
5
Packet Pg. 165
5.1.a
Salinity measurements along the northern (Harbor Square) and eastern (Highway 104)
edges averaged 0.2 ppt year-round. This indicates that the saltwater does not reach these areas
even when the tidegate is secured open in the spring/summer.
Fecal Coliform Bacteria
Counts of fecal coliform bacteria colonies cultured from water samples collected varied
considerably by location/season/day. There are no Washington Water Quality Standards for
fecal coliform for freshwater aquatic life. However, if we use the Washington criteria for water
contact recreation (i.e., levels must not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 mL)
as an indicator of a potential bacteria problem, then there are a number of samples that are of
concern. Fecal coliform counts appear to be higher after a period of rain. Extremely high counts
of fecal coliform bacteria exceeding 8000 colonies per 100mL occurred at lower Willow Creek.
Pollutants
We will be collecting water samples for pollutant analysis through the end of this year
using the $15K provided by the Edmonds City Council in 2018. We plan to collect two quarterly
samples and at least two rainstorm samples and deliver them to the ALS Laboratory in Everett
for heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). We plan to provide a separate
comprehensive report on all the pollutant analyses to the Council when we complete this
sampling.
To date, with past funding from the Council and other sources, we have had 127
water/sediment samples analyzed by the state accredited, ALS Laboratory in Everett for heavy
metals (Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Iron, Lead, Mercury, Zinc), and petroleum
derived compounds (PAHs, TPH, BTEX). Due to the high cost of pollutant analyses, not all
sites were sampled during each collection nor were all compounds tested for in each sample
collected.
Of greatest concern to date is the detection of seven carcinogenic PAHs that exceeded
WA State Human Health Criteria for Consumption of Water and Organisms [WAC 173-201A-
240]. Of the 107 samples analyzed for PAHs, 84 (78%) had levels of one of more of the
following carcinogenic PAHs that exceeded WA criteria: Benzo[a]anthracene, Benzo[a]pyrene,
Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Chrysene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, and
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene.
Figure 1 shows the levels of exceedance by season at each site sampled. Note that the
east edge of the Marsh (at storm drain off Hwy 104) and the north edge of Marsh (along Harbor
Square) had the highest percentage exceedance for multiple carcinogenic PAHs.
0
Packet Pg. 166
5.1.a
SALMON STEWARDSHIP
Stream Surveys
For the past three years, we have surveyed private property owners on lower Shell Creek
to obtain local knowledge on coho and chum salmon spawning in the creek, and conducted
periodic surveys of the creek to determine salmon presence/absence and habitat conditions.
Through these surveys, we have identified fish passage barriers and restoration needs, and then
worked with private property owners to improve salmon habitat.
Unfortunately, we saw very few salmon or redds this year. While the residents say there
are generally more salmon every other year (so fewer salmon isn't too odd), some residents said
this was the first time ever that they had seen no salmon at all.
Habitat Restoration -
Students Saving Salmon has worked with streamside residents along Shell to plan habitat
restoration on multiple properties over the past two years. Over 600 native plants have been
planted along Shell Creek by students and community volunteers that assisted. Students plan to
conduct further restoration work if donations are available for purchase of native plants and wire
cages (as needed).
In March of 2019, Students Saving Salmon worked with Holy Rosary Church to develop
a plan for planting 160 native plants consisting of 12 species of shrubs and trees along Shell
Creek on the church's property. The plan included placing wire cages around some of the new
plants to prevent mountain beaver foraging (a prior planting at this site in 2017 essentially failed
because mountain beavers ate most of the new plants within a 6-month period). The Olympic
Fly Fishers Club donated the funding used to purchase the plants and wire cages. Prior to the
planting event, invasive species were removed and the site was plotted for individual plant
species locations. Over 40 students and community volunteers, including Edmonds City
Council, Edmonds Tree Board and Sound Salmon Solutions, participated in the planting event.
Salmon Enhancement
Since 2017, students have volunteered at the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery assisting
with incubating about 80,000 coho eggs, transferring coho fry to raceways, preparing the pond
for rearing, feeding the juvenile coho in the rearing pond, and capturing and releasing coho fry
into streams. Students have learned valuable skills about the handling of salmon and the
importance of hatcheries in supplementation programs. We hope more of the hatchery coho can
be released in local creeks in Edmonds to help bring back salmon populations in our area
The water quality data collected by Students Saving Salmon, demonstrating the good
quality of water in Shell Creek, was used to convince the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife to allow the placement of juvenile coho from Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery into
upper Shell Creek. The upper areas of Shell Creek have good habitat for spawning and rearing
of juvenile salmon, but it has been blocked from access by spawning salmon for many years due
to man-made obstacles such as impassable culverts, pipes, and a five-foot man-made waterfall.
7
Packet Pg. 167
5.1.a
Students have released juvenile coho salmon from the Willow Creek hatchery into Shell
Creek each year since 2017. Over 1,000 juvenile coho salmon measuring 3-4 inches have been
released each year at various locations including Yost Park, along Sprague Ave., on Holy Rosary
Church property, and along Brookmere Drive. These juvenile coho salmon live and grow in
freshwater streams for their first year of life and then migrate to the ocean the next year.
The Stream Team has also assisted with a small chum salmon hatchery located in upper
Lund Gulch Creek. This hatchery raises 10,000 chum salmon for release into lower Lunds
Gulch Creek.
Hatchboxes
Working with the WA Dept Fish and Wildlife, Grover's Creek Salmon Hatchery and
Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery, the Stream Team is exploring the use of instream egg
incubators (called `hatchboxes') to see if the salmon eggs from the hatchery could be hatched in
the stream under more natural conditions with "natural" release of the hatched fry when they
have consumed their yolk sac and are ready to begin life in the stream.
Our first attempt with a single hatchbox in 2018 was unsuccessful because sediment
filled the hatchbox over time. That experience taught us that we needed to select very specific
sites in stream where sediment buildup would not occur, or be minimal (which is very difficult to
do due to the amounts of naturally flowing sediments in creeks).
In 2019, with help from a donation of hatchboxes from Olympic Fly Fishers, students
evaluated the use of the hatchboxes with coho salmon eggs in Shell Creek and chum salmon eggs
in Lunds Gulch Creek. Students assisted in the placement and retrieval of the hatchboxes in the
creeks and examined each chamber in the hatchbox for sediment loading and unhatched eggs.
We were able to achieve 89% hatching/release overall with the lowest hatching of 78% in a
Lunds Gulch chum hatchbox with sediment problems and the highest hatching/release of 100%
in a different Lunds Gulch chum hatchbox. A coho salmon hatchbox in Shell Creek had a 99%
hatching/release.
We plan to continue the use of hatchboxes in these creeks next year with plans to place
2000 coho eggs in hatchboxes in Shell, Willow and Lunds Gulch Creeks, and 2000 chum salmon
eggs in hatchboxes in lower Shell Creek and lower Lunds Gulch Creek.
OUTREACH
Students work to increase awareness of the need to protect and improve streams,
wetlands, and nearshore environments. Students have presented the results of their water quality
analyses and observations on stream conditions to the Edmonds City Council each year for the
past three years. Besides talking to streamside residents about salmon and their habitat during
our surveys each year, more formal presentations have been made to community groups
including Rotary Clubs, Olympic Fly Fishers, Trout Unlimited, Puget Sound Anglers, Save Our
Marsh, Brighton School, Taming Bigfoot, and Edmonds Floretum Club. We have had a booth at
Packet Pg. 168
5.1.a
community events such as Edmonds' Watershed Fun Festival, Family Day at the Port, Westgate
Elementary Science Night, Edmonds Heights School Science Fair, and the Edmonds Waterfront
Festival.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Stream and Marsh Monitoring
We appreciate the continued support we've received from the Edmonds City Council and
the City of Edmonds, and ask that $2,500 provided each year in the city budget continue as those
funds are critical for obtaining the supplies necessary for students to conduct this project. The
citizen science project and stream surveys provide real-time information on our environment that
is essential for stormwater management, city planning, and salmon restoration efforts.
Fish Passage Barriers
We have observed both manmade and debris/log barriers that prevent adult salmon from
accessing potential spawning and rearing areas. The City should consider developing protocols
and plans for addressing barriers in creeks whether on public or private property.
Manmade waterfall - Shell Creek has a manmade 5-foot waterfall just downstream of 71h
Ave. N. and Glenn Street between the Soundview Apartments and 625 Carol Way that totally
blocks salmon passage. Students are willing to help the property owner apply for salmon
restoration funds to replace the waterfall with upstream step -pools, but the property owner has
refused to discuss this serious obstacle that blocks access to considerable upstream spawning
habitat in Shell Creek.
Impassable culverts (pipes) under roads - This is a problem affecting salmon throughout
Washington, and Edmonds has them too.
Perrinville Creek has an impassable culvert under Talbot Road that has been known for
some time but not addressed. Newer restoration techniques that don't require expensive culvert
replacement/road removal should be pursued to allow salmon passage. Adult salmon were
observed below this culvert in 2018 and are currently limited to a short length of freshwater
spawning area due to this impassable culvert.
Shell Creek has impassable culverts at 9th Ave (near Main Street) and upstream just
before the creek goes under Main Street into Yost Park. However, these blockages don't
actually affect adult salmon at this time since the manmade waterfall near 7th Ave. N. prevents
adult salmon from reaching 9th Ave.
Debris/logspassage obstacles at culverts - Debris and logs flow naturally in steams, but
can get lodged in culverts or in front of culverts and prevent fish passage. Protocols and city
authorizations are needed to have such obstacles removed, whether it is on public or private
property, as they occur so they don't impede salmon passage.
This past winter, a very large log was pushed up high on the beach by winter storms/high
tides landing right in front of the railroad tracks culvert where Shell Creek exits to Puget Sound.
This log, due to its size and location high on the beach, is very unlikely to be moved by tides
0
Packet Pg. 169
5.1.a
prior to the coming fall migration of adult salmon. Although the creek is flowing under the log
and not backing up, there is only about one inch of water depth and that will likely prevent adult
salmon from entering the creek. Due to the low numbers of adult salmon observed in Shell
Creek these past two years, we can't risk losing the coming years' run due to this obstacle.
Through our salmon surveys, we also observed a partially blocked culvert in lower Shell
Creek that is preventing adult chum salmon passage though coho salmon did pass it. As time
passes, it likely will prevent all fish passage and likely become a flooding problem. Because this
culvert is on private property, the City personnel have advised they don't have authority to use
their equipment to help remove the debris. This needs to change so City staff can help restore
public resources (i.e., salmon) in the creek.
Excess sediment in creeks
Heavy rainfall and excess stormwater runoff can cause erosion that results in excess
sediment deposits in creeks that cover streambed gravel that is essential habitat for aquatic life.
Salmon lay their egg in gravel and excess sediment can smother laid eggs or prevent salmon
access to the gravel they use for spawning.
Shell Creek sediment deposits - Over the past four years, we have observed increased
sediment deposits each year in Shell Creek. Areas of lower Shell Creek where we observed
chum salmon spawning in gravel are now covered with sediment and thus unusable for
spawning. We have also observed that some of the steeper bluffs along the creek in Yost Park
are eroding and likely contributing to the sediment problem. We recommend the City begin
examining approaches for curtailing some of the erosion in Yost Park whether it be specialized
planting or use of logs or other material to stabilize the bluffs.
Perrinville Creek sediment flow - Perrinville Creek has known sediment problems and
city staff do remove excess sediment each year in the lower area to prevent flooding. High flows
from heavy rain and excess stormwater through the steep ravine in Southwest County Park is
likely the source of much of the sediment. All of the upper Perrinville Creek watershed is in
storm drains that all combine to enter the creek at one culvert next to the Perrinville Post Office,
thus causing high velocity heavy flow during large rainstorms. Any additional stormwater will
only exacerbate the problem, so a management plan needs to be implemented for the watershed
that requires any new stormwater drainage to be injected into the ground and not in additional
storm drains to the creek.
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
The Edmonds Marsh has water quality problems and deteriorating habitat that require a
comprehensive restoration effort. The Edmonds Marsh is supposed to be a saltwater estuary, but
saltwater flow is curtailed in fall and winter months due to flooding concerns. Fish passage is
precluded because the Marsh drains to Puget Sound in a 1,600-foot pipe that exits into deep
water well below the surface. The many years of curtailed flow through the Marsh has resulted
in sediment deposits and vegetation growth on fences that prevent adequate circulation. Invasive
species dominate much of the riparian areas preventing native plant growth needed for a healthy
ecosystem. Lack of water circulation has caused standing water in portions of the Marsh that
10
Packet Pg. 170
5.1.a
have low dissolved oxygen. The western edge of the Marsh lacks vegetation and water
temperatures exceed 70 degrees in summer months. The City is well aware of these problems
and recently prioritized efforts to construct tidal/stream channels that will provide an open
"daylighted" connection to Puget Sound. However, it may be some years before the City obtains
the grants and authorizations necessary to undertake this project.
In the interim, a few things the City should consider are:
1) Leave the tide gate secured open year-round to allow the marsh to begin
reverting back to a true saltwater estuary.
2) Work with WSDOT to remove the fences on both sides of Highway 104.
Invasive nightshade has grown into a web on the fences that accumulate sediment
and prevent water circulation. Better circulation and flow of water from
Shellabarger Creek into the Marsh also may help prevent flooding.
3) Improve water circulation by dredging areas where flow is restricted
4) Remove invasive species and replacing them with native plants
5) Plant vegetation on western edge of the Marsh and require BNSF to stop using
herbicides near the Marsh.
Water quality and pollutants
We've found that stream water quality in Edmonds is generally good, but stormwater
inputs carrying pollutants is a problem. We encourage residents to keep doing what they're
doing and following best management practices suggested on the City's webpage. Stormwater
pollutants were highest at the Marsh along Highway 104 where ferry traffic is heavy. One
suggestion is to explore ways to minimize car idling (reducing exhaust fumes) while they wait to
move forward in the ferry lines. The City should work with WSDOT Ferries on this issue.
Salmon enhancement and habitat restoration
Much of the streamside habitat in Edmonds needs restoration and salmon numbers have
declined. Since most of our creeks are on private property, restoring salmon and streamside
habitat will require private property owner "buy -in" and participation. With continuing support
from the City, Students Saving Salmon will continue working with private property owners and
undertaking additional enhancement efforts such as the use of hatchboxes and community
restoration projects.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We want to thank the many people in the community that have supported our efforts to restore
salmon in Edmonds!!
11
Packet Pg. 171
5.1.a
Percentage over State Criteria
0 0 0 0
m
K
SUMMER
m �
�a
WINTER I
ro
1
FALL
I
m
@
SPRING
1
SUMMER
WINTER
K
m
0
s
m
a
oa
m
K
m
0
c
m
Ln
s
m
0
m
m
m
a
m
oa
m
0
m
O
m
FALL I
SPRING I
SUMMER
WINTER
FALL
SPRING I11 1!
SUMMER 1 11 11
WINTER
FALL IIIN
SPRING j I 1 11
SUMMER
WINTER
FALL jIjI1 1
SPRING 111I11 II
SUMMER I 1 I
WINTER `
FALL III 1
SPRING
SUMMER 11 I �II
WINTER I 1
�; L
Oiq
Packet Pg. 172
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Monthly Council Subcommittee Reports and Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A. For information only.
Narrative
This is an opportunity for Councilmembers to report on items discussed at their committee meetings
held the previous week. The committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
PPW070919
FC070919
PSPP070919
Packet Pg. 173
7.1.a
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
July 9, 2019
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson (Chair)
Councilmember Dave Teitzel
Mayor Earling
Other Guests Present
Grant Haig, McKinstry
Staff Present
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Thom Sullivan, Facilities Maintenance Mgr.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
The meeting was called to order at 7:09 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Item 5, Amend Edmonds
Community Development Code Chapter 20.70 Street Vacations, and Item 9, Proposal for Personal
Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater Treatment Plant were removed from
the agenda as they were being considered by the PSPP Committee.
1. WDFW Contract for Fishing Pier
Ms. Hite explained the contract for the fishing pier renovation with WDFW has expired. This new
contract is to allow the City to settle with the contractor and to complete repairs of the fishing pier. The
total value is $150,000. Questions and discussion followed regarding the timing to complete repairs,
estimated cost of the repair, the settlement amount, REET funds allocated to the project.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
2. Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds School District for Meadowdale Preschool
Ms. Hite advised the City has had an ILA with Edmonds School District for many years for the
Meadowdale Preschool program which allows the District to place students in the program run by the
Parks Department. There is no charge to the families as the District pays the enrollment fee. Questions
and discussion followed regarding the number of spaces the ILA reserves, how families qualify, and no
significant changes to this year's ILA.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
3. Frances Anderson Roofing Request for Bid
Ms. Hite explained the project was bid twice; both times the bids exceeded the engineer's estimate and
bids were rejected. The specifications on the allowable roof systems were changed to appeal to a
broader range of contractors in the hopes of attracting additional bids closer to the engineer's estimate.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
4. Waterfront Redevelopment Contracts
Ms. Hite explained the Waterfront Redevelopment project includes the waterfront rehab, parking lot and
the frontage improvements. The bids for this project were $1.2M over the engineer's estimate. This item
is for discussion only, the City is in active negotiations and anticipates bringing three contracts to Council
for approval to align this project with the Waterfront Center rebuild, 1) construction contract with WG
Packet Pg. 174
7.1.a
07/09/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2
Clarke, 2) construction administration contract with KBA, and 3) design support contract with
Environmental Works.
Ms. Hite reviewed funding sources and expenses for the Waterfront Redevelopment Budget Summary,
highlighting expense items that still being negotiated. The funding shortfall is $814,057; the goal is to
reduce the shortfall to $600,000-700,000. The Finance Committee is reviewing a $500,000 budget
amendment for this project from the following sources: reallocating $200,000 for land acquisition in
Fund 126 to this project, $100,000 from REET, and $200,000 from the General Fund. Rather than wait
for another committee meeting, she recommended staff present to full Council when more solid
numbers are available.
Questions and discussion included net improvement to the environment (75%), permits, reason the bids
exceeded the engineer's estimate (technical difficulty of the project), ways to lower costs, this project
separate from the work in front of the Ebb Tide, when construction will begin and end, work that can
occur with the bulkhead in place, advantages of having the same construction company for the
Waterfront Center and this project, artwork for the project versus 1 % for Art, preference not to use land
acquisition funds and to identify other funding sources, construction sequencing, avoiding damage to
the parking lot during completion of Waterfront Redevelopment program, and removal of trees on the
site. Staff to research whether street trees will be retained.
Action: Schedule for full Council
6. Report on Bids for the Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Project
Mr. English reported bids were opened today. Two bids were received, the apparent low bidder was
Boss Construction in the amount of $1,529,418, approximately $200,000 above the engineer's estimate
of $1,325,000. The funding includes a $515,000 appropriation from the State legislature. Staff will
evaluate the bid and the information submitted and determine how to fund the shortfall. He
recommended presenting to full Council once the bid results are confirmed and a funding strategy has
been identified for the difference. Questions and discussion included where flow from Dayton will be
directed, impact of the project on the marsh, and the Port's oyster shell drainage system. Committee
requested the presentation to Council include a key for the map and a description of the impact of the
project on the marsh.
Action: Schedule for full Council, possibly July 23
7. Presentation of a Professional Services Agreement with Frameworks for the Downtown
Parking Study
Mr. Williams relayed the successful commercial environment downtown has created more demand for
parking. The most recent parking study was done in 2003. The proposed parking study would inventory
the availability of on and off-street spaces, collect data regarding the level of usage during a typical
weekday and weekend day, analyze the data and determine what the demand is, the available spaces,
how to better identify parking, etc. If more than 75-85% of the available spaces are full, there is a
problem that needs to be addressed. Once the data is collected and analyzed, a list of possible
strategies will be developed, the pros and cons of the strategies evaluated and a report present with
possible options and implementation strategies. The study includes several public meetings and
presentations to Council. Frameworks' proposed scope of work is $91,000.
Questions and discussion included the amount budgeted for the study ($40,000), requirement for a
budget amendment to add funds for the study, funds required for staff time/management ($20,000),
boundaries of the study, and ensuring the study is done right,
Packet Pg. 175
7.1.a
07/09/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3
Councilmember Teitzel referred to other projects such as the Waterfront Connector, the Welcome to
Edmonds sign on SR-104, Tree Code, etc. where citizens were not engaged. He proposed
Councilmember Mesaros and he hold community engagement (ideation) forums early on and outreach
on social media to get people engaged.
Questions and discussion included the importance of doing public engagement first; identifying the
problem and hearing from downtown residents and business owners before data collection begins;
timing of the project elements; narrowing the scope of issues in the study area; paying particular
attention to Civic Center, the Waterfront Center and downtown; parking strategies that do not need to
be included; considering new technologies; making the best use of existing space; doing parking counts
during the summer; residential and employee parking permit areas; not having the consultant create
solutions without knowing the problem; ferry commuter parking; best practices in other cities; and how
far people are willing to walk. Suggestions included:
• Determine peak activity hours for Civic and Waterfront Center
• Reach out to Ed!, DEMA, condo associations, Chamber, Civic Project Advisory Committee, etc.
• Do ideation forums ahead of parking study process
• Combine data collection with public engagement
• Rewrite consultant contract to include increased public engagement
• Public engagement at the beginning by Council/staff to identify problems, engage citizens and
solicit ideas
Action: Schedule for full Council
8. City of Edmonds Facility Condition Assessment study by McKinstry
Mr. Williams introduced Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager, and Grant Haig, McKinstry. Mr. Williams
reviewed:
• Overview and history
o In 2018, the City of Edmonds commissioned a Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) with
McKinstry. This effort supplemented research conducted in 2015 by Cardno, Inc.
o Cardno Study was a high-level review of the existing conditions of facilities owned by the
City of Edmonds.
o In addition to the basic building analysis Cardno produced McKinstry added all the other
assets in our buildings including HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and envelope issues like
exterior finishes, windows, fire suppression, fences and parking lots.
o In addition to assessing condition, remaining life and replacement costs and periodic
maintenance costs were also estimated
• Facility Condition index (FCI) scores
o The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is a management benchmark used to objectively assess
current and projected condition of a building asset. This is often the output from a
Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). FCI is defined as the ratio of
current year required renewal cost to current building replacement value:
Excellent
0-5%
Good
5-10
Fair
10-15
Poor
15-25
Critical
25+%
• 5-year capital expenditures
Building
FCI Score
5-year FCI Score
Boys & Girls Club
6.8%
14.4%
Cemetery Building
3.5%
14.4%
City Hall
13.8%
19.0%
Fishing Pier
11.7%
241 %
Packet Pg. 176
7.1.a
07/09/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4
Frances Anderson Center
13.6%
18.0%
FS 16
3.6%
11.7%
FS 17
10.1 %
25.9%
FS 20
3.4%
17.5%
Historic Log Cabin
10.8%
24.1 %
Historic Museum
3.6%
14.3%
Library and Plaza Room
13.3%
30.0%
Meadowdale Club House
5.4%
9.0%
Old Public Works
6.0%
9.6%
Parks Maint. Building
14.5%
22.6%
Public Safety Building
5.5%
16.1 %
Public Works O&M Center
20%
26.3%
Wade James Theater
7.2%
16.9%
Yost Pool House
8.7%
19.1 %
• Deferred maintenance needs
o $6.5M current deferred maintenance
Category
Amount
HVAC & Plumbing
$3,315,000*
Electrical
$1,200,000*
Interiors (e.g. flooring, ceiling tiles or furniture
$750,000
Roofing
$500,000
Exteriors (e.g. parkinglots, fencing or exterior finishes
$330,000
Fire, life safety & security
$315,000
Other (e.g. specialty equipment or solar inverters)
$165,000
Total
$6,575,000
*Not in Cardno Report
** includes Frances Anderson Center roof which largely funded by State grant
o $800,000 annual baseline budget needed to maintain facilities independent of deferred
maintenance on existing facilities
o Current funding level at $400,000-700,000 per year is not sufficient for sustainable facilities
management
o $9.6M of cumulative 5-year deferred maintenance ($6.5M +-$800,000/year for 4 years)
o Top Projects
1. HVAC upgrades at Frances Anderson, City Hall, FS 16, Public Works O&M and the
Public Safety Building.
2. Electrical investigation and upgrades at any buildings built around or before 1980 (e.g.
City Hall, Old Public Works and the Library)
3. Fire alarm system replacements at City Hall, Public Safety, Public Works O&M and the
Wade James Theater.
4. Aesthetic upgrades such as flooring, ceiling tiles, exterior finishes, and parking lot repairs
across nearly all facilities.
Cost of delay
o At current funding levels, the cumulative cost of delay on deferred maintenance over the
next five years will be: >$2,000,000 plus annual inflation costs on current deferred
maintenance backlog: $260,000 @ 4% annually
Summary of key findings
o Deferred maintenance backlog is $6.5M
o $800,000 annual investment is needed independent of deferred maintenance backlog.
o Assuming $100-$200k in additional grants, the City of Edmonds should plan to allocate
$650k-$700k to address planned capital renewal.
o Backlog caused by historical underfunding, understaffing and gaps in the capital planning
process. (i.e. $56,600/yr. for 20 straight years)
Budget sustainability - paving
Packet Pg. 177
07/09/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 5
7.1.a
o Graph of percentage of city streets overlaid based on annual budget
Questions and discussion included the FCI percentages, whether FCI is an industry standard, no
environmental hazards found in the assessment, modifying the FCI rating system, policy discussion to
address deferred maintenance backlog, looking at all budget needs in context, equipment that is outside
the industry standard lifetime, ad why the City changed from Cardno to McKinstry.
Action: McKinstry finalize the report and provide to Finance Committee. Schedule for full Council
10. Willow Creek Daylighting and Marsh Restoration -Design
The following design costs are estimates based on the total project cost:
Item
Estimated Additional Cost
Running Total
30% Design
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
60% Design (Including Permits)
$700,000
$ 1,200,000
90% Design
$ 140,000
$ 1,340,000
100% Design
$ 110,000
$ 1,450,000
Staff Time (10% of Design)
$ 150,000
$ 1,600,000
Construction Contract
$13,320,000
$14,920,000
Construction Management (15%)
$1,998,000
$16,918,000
Mr. Williams commented staff, Council and the community are anxious to proceed. Unocal is not
currently allowing access to the property and the transfer of ownership will likely not occur this year. In
the meantime, 30% and 60% design could be done; the logical funders of the project, RCO and others,
have indicated they would consider funds spent on design as a match. This option uses some/all of
$1.3M set aside to begin design for the marsh; removal of the 180 gate would also be funded from that
source. Proceeding with design is a way to make progress while waiting for real estate issues to resolve.
Questions and discussion included there being no downside to proceeding with design, frustration with
the length of time the property transfer is taking, criteria to be met by Unocal before property can
transfer, the need for 60% design to qualify for grants, likely grant sources, advantages of moving
forward with design, and a potential emergency at -grade crossing where the old Unocal property road
was.
Action: Schedule for full Council
11. 180 Gate Removal Protect
Mr. Williams explained the valve on the pipe that keeps water from flowing into and out of the marsh
requires 180 complete turns to close/open. Removal of the gate would allow year-round free flow of
saltwater in and out of the marsh. Staff has been hesitant to remove the gate due to flooding on SR-
104 and Dayton. Bids were opened today on the Dayton Street pump station; that project should be
finished this year and will address the flooding problem. The 180 gate is not the tidegate.
Questions and discussion included the location of the 180 gate, agencies that will have to authorize the
City to access it, difference between the 180 gate and the tidegate, the Dayton Street pump station also
facilitating opening of the tidegate, removal of the gate removing a fish barrier, and the cost to do the
removal in-house. Committee requested the presentation to Council include an aerial view of the
location.
Action: Schedule for full Council
The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Packet Pg. 178
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
July 9, 2019
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Tom Mesaros
Council President Adrienne Fraley-Monillas
Mayor Dave Earling
Other Guests Present
Zach Bauder, Student Representative
Staff Present
Scott James, Finance Director
Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Linda Coburn, Municipal Court Judge
Thom Sullivan, Facilities Maintenance Mgr.
Uneek Maylor, Court Administrator
Jerrie Bevington, Recorder
The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. (The agenda was reordered
due to AV issues.)
2. Proposal for Personal Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Mr. Williams explained the City has been unsuccessful in filling the Treatment Plant Superintendent
position for over a year. He described the rational for a personal services contract for a program
administrator and the individual's duties. He proposed hiring Michael Derrick, former Ronald
Wastewater District General Manager, as a program administrator on a one-year employment
contract. The salary is the 4th step and he will be entitled to non -represented employee benefits. The
Plant Superintendent position was included in the 2019 budget. Questions and discussion included
the proposed salary and WWTP Manager Pam Randolph supervising employees.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
3. Willow Creek Daylighting and Marsh Restoration -Design
Mr. Williams explained access to the site is controlled by Unocal; the site will transfer to WSDOT in
the future. The next phase for this project is 30% and 60% design and removal of the 180 valve. The
potential granting agencies will accept the design as a match. Proceeding with design is a way to
make progress on the project while waiting for the land transfer.
Action: Schedule for full Council
4. 180 Gate Removal Project
Mr. Williams advised the 180 valve (requires 180 complete turns to open/close it) restricts saltwater
flow in/out of the Edmonds Marsh and removing the gate will enhance saltwater exchange. (This is
not the tidegate.) Approval by Unocal and/or WSDOT will be required as well as access across BNSF
right-of-way; once those are obtained City staff can remove the gate. In response to a question from
Councilmember Buckshnis regarding why this gate could be removed when she had been advocating
for it in the past, Councilmember Mesaros said it was because the Dayton Street pump station will
resolve flooding. Mr. Williams said bids were opened for the Dayton Street pump station today.
Action: Schedule for full Council
8. Review Contract for Jerrie Bevington
a�
a�
0
IS,
0
U
U_
c
a�
E
�a
a
Packet Pg. 179
07/09/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
Council President Fraley-Monillas said the contract was approved earlier this year but never finalized.
The contract includes a $1/hour increase. The increase will be retroactive to January 1, 2019.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
6. May 2019 Monthly Financial Report
Mr. Turley reported:
• May is 42% through the year
• General Fund is trending slightly ahead (46%)
• Expenditures are 26% due to projects that haven't started yet
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
City of Edmonds Facility Condition Assessment study by McKinstry
Mr. Williams introduced Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager, who introduced Kevin and Grant from
McKinstry. Mr. Williams reviewed:
• Overview and history
o In 2018, the City of Edmonds commissioned a Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) with
McKinstry. This effort supplemented research conducted in 2015 by Cardno, Inc.
o Cardno Study was a high-level review of the existing conditions of facilities owned by the
City of Edmonds.
o In addition to the basic building analysis Cardno produced McKinstry added all the other
assets in our buildings including HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and envelope issues like
exterior finishes, windows, fire suppression, fences and parking lots.
o In addition to assessing condition, remaining life and replacement costs and periodic
maintenance costs were also estimated
• Facility Condition index (FCI) scores
o The Facility Condition Index (FCI) is a management benchmark used to objectively assess
current and projected condition of a building asset. This is often the output from a
Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). FCI is defined as the ratio of
current year required renewal cost to current building replacement value:
Excellent
0-5%
Good
5-10
Fair
10-15
Poor
15-25
Critical
25+%
• 5-year capital expenditures
Building
FCI Score
5-year FCI Score
Boys & Girls Club
6.8%
14.4%
Cemetery Building
3.5%
14.4%
City Hall
13.8%
19.0%
Fishing Pier
11.7%
241 %
Frances Anderson Center
13.6%
18.0%
FS 16
3.6%
11.7%
FS 17
10.1 %
25.9%
FS 20
3.4%
17.5%
Historic Log Cabin
10.8%
24.1 %
Historic Museum
3.6%
14.3%
Library and Plaza Room
13.3%
30.0%
Meadowdale Club House
5.4%
9.0%
a�
CD
0
ti
0
U
U_
c
CD
E
U
W
a
Packet Pg. 180
7.1.b
07/09/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
Old Public Works
6.0%
9.6%
Parks Maint. Building
14.5%
22.6%
Public Safety Building
5.5%
16.1 %
Public Works O&M Center
20%
26.3%
Wade James Theater
7.2%
16.9%
Yost Pool House
8.7%
19.1 %
Deferred maintenance needs
o $6.5M current deferred maintenance
Category
Amount
HVAC & Plumbing
$3,315,000*
Electrical
$1,200,000*
Interiors (e.g. flooring, ceiling tiles or furniture)
$750,000
Roofing
$500,000
Exteriors (e.g. parking lots, fencing or exterior finishes
$330,000
Fire, life safety & security
$315,000
Other (e.g. specialty equipment or solar inverters
$165,000
Total
$6,575,000
*Not in Cardno Report N
** Includes Frances Anderson Center roof which largely funded by State grant o
o $800,000 annual baseline budget needed to maintain facilities independent of deferred
maintenance on existing facilities
o Current funding level at $400,000-700,000 per year is not sufficient for sustainable facilities
management E
o $9.6M of cumulative 5-year deferred maintenance ($6.5M +—$800,000/year for 4 years) o
o Top Projects
1. HVAC upgrades at Frances Anderson, City Hall, FS 16, Public Works O&M and the
Public Safety Building. —
2. Electrical investigation and upgrades at any buildings built around or before 1980 (e.g.
City Hall, Old Public Works and the Library) 0
3. Fire alarm system replacements at City Hall, Public Safety, Public Works O&M and the >
Wade James Theater.
4. Aesthetic upgrades such as flooring, ceiling tiles, exterior finishes, and parking lot c
repairs across nearly all facilities.
Cost of delay
o At current funding levels, the cumulative cost of delay on deferred maintenance over the c
next five years will be: >$2,000,000 plus annual inflation costs on current deferred o
maintenance backlog: $260,000 @ 4% annually U_
Summary of key findings
o Deferred maintenance backlog is $6.5M
■ Includes items that reached end of life this year or several years ago
■ Equipment can live past expected end of life but risk of failure increases
■ Cost of replacement can be much higher to replace equipment that fails expectedly a
o $800,000 annual investment is needed independent of deferred maintenance backlog.
o Assuming $100-$200k in additional grants, the City of Edmonds should plan to allocate
$650k-$700k to address planned capital renewal.
o Backlog caused by historical underfunding, understaffing and gaps in the capital planning
process. (i.e. $56,600/yr. for 20 straight years)
Budget sustainability - paving
o Graph of percentage of city streets overlaid based on annual budget
Questions and discussion included the City has not done this depth of an FCA in the past, project
management required to accomplish deferred maintenance in-house, prioritizing deferred
maintenance over the next five years, replacing HVAC systems by zone, low voltage upgrades,
Packet Pg. 181
7.1.b
07/09/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4
maintenance of fire stations, opportunity to include funds for deferred maintenance in a park bond,
using criticality ratings to determine priorities, and schedule for updating the FCA.
Action: Schedule for full Council
5. Probation Officer Court Position
Ms. Maylor explained the court currently has a vacant Court Clerk position; however, based on
caseload and the court's needs, staff is requesting to add an additional Probation Officer position
instead. Some of the court's clerical duties have been minimized on the launch of Laserfiche; the rest
for the duties will be offloaded to current court staff. The existing Probation Officer has the caseload of
at least two officers and the Edmonds Court does pretrial services monitoring which surrounding cities
do not provide. The difference between salaries is about $9,000/year; the court has sufficient budget
to cover that amount. Judge Coburn commented on incentives for defendants to participate in pretrial
services and savings in the City's jail budget as a result. Discussion followed regarding benefits of
pretrial services monitoring.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
7. Second Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment
Mr. James reviewed:
• 17 amendments totaling $3,344,131
• Offset by $2,890,279 in new revenue
• Overall fund balance reduced by $453,852
• Proposed amendments
o Records Storage/Transfer Project
o Public Records Request Software enhancement
o Citizens' Housing Commission expenses
o Ebb Tide expert witnesses
o Transfer money out of Risk Fund to General Fund (per the newly adopted Fund Balance
Policy)
o Transfer money out of Contingency Fund to General Fund (per newly adopted Fund
Balance Policy) — change amount from $1.7M to $3.8M
o Historic calendar printing
o Final research to complete Kone Consulting Homeless Report
o Joint tourism promotion ad purchased in the WA State Visitor's Guide
o Paine Field Terminal Advertisement
o Yost Pool shower boiler
o Yost Pool clock (funded via community initiative)
o Seaview Park benches and picnic table
Q
Ms. Hite reviewed a budget amendment to fund the gap for the Waterfront Redevelopment project.
The City received two high bids, disqualified both bids and have been directly negotiating with WG
Clarke to complete the project. She estimated the gap will be approximately $700,000. Mr. James
continued the review of budget amendments:
• 1 % for Art (174t" & 71 It Storm Improvement project)
Additional budget for new Gateway sign at 51" Ave S & SR-104
LEOFF 1 Fire Fund reimbursement
Questions and discussion included the difference between General Fund revenues ($18.8M) and
expenses ($17.4M), balance in the Council Contingency Fund, whether the source of funding for the
Citizen's Housing Commission expenses should be the Council Contingency Fund or ending fund
Packet Pg. 182
7.1.b
07/09/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 5
balance, and total funds allocated to the Waterfront Redevelopment project. Council President Fraley-
Monillas and Mr. James will confer regarding the funding source for the Citizen's Housing
Commission expenses.
Action: Schedule for full Council
The meeting was adjourned at 8:22 p.m.
Q
Packet Pg. 183
7.1.c
PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
July 9, 2019
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Mike Nelson (Chair)
Councilmember Neil Tibbott
Staff Present
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Linda Coburn, Municipal Court Judge
Uneek Maylor, Court Administrator
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr.
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. Proposal for Personal
Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater Treatment Plant was added to the
agenda as Item 4.
1. Amend Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.70 Street Vacations
Ms. McConnell highlighted amendments to ECDC 20.70 to address:
• Requirement for an appraisal to be completed by a City selected appraiser, at the expense of
the applicant, and only after staff determines easements, alternative right-of-way, etc. and a
resolution of intent to vacate has been approved by the Council.
• Allows the City to require an easement, compensation or both
• Allowance for the conditions placed on the street vacation to be met within a timeframe set by
resolution or within 90-days as stated in the code
Mr. Taraday explained deferring the appraisal until after those determinations are made allows the
appraisal to take into the account, for example, the reservation of an easement which will often lower
the property's value. The revised appraisal process will allow all applicants to be treated the same.
Currently, if the Council imposes reservation of an easement condition, it can be a windfall for the
applicant as they are not required to pay compensation.
Questions and discussion included the Council's role in street vacations, public hearing process,
timeframe for conditions to be met, and the intent of the amendments to clean up the process and
ensure the City receives fair value for street vacations.
Action: Refer to Planning Board for review and recommendation to Council
2. Probation Officer Court Position
Ms. Maylor explained the court currently has a vacant Court Clerk position. Based on caseloads and
the court's needs, she determined it would be better to hire an additional Probation Officer instead.
The Probation Officer's caseload for pretrial services and monitoring have nearly doubled in the last
couple years. Some of the court's clerical duties have been minimized due to the launch of Laserfiche.
Edmonds is the only court in the area that does pretrial services monitoring which has significantly
lowered the City's jail costs. The court has sufficient budget to cover the difference in the positions'
salaries..
Questions and discussion included the recidivism rate for individuals being monitored versus in
custody (under 20%), office space for the second officer, benefits of monitoring such as providing
Packet Pg. 184
7.1.c
07/09/19 PSPP Committee Minutes, Page 2
individuals accountability, ability of the Probation Officer to referral individuals to services during
check -ins, and cost savings to the City.
Action: Schedule for full Council
3. Update on Climate Goals Project
Ms. Hope explained this project is based on Resolution No. 1389, to achieve or exceed the goals
established in the Paris Climate Accord at the local level. The Climate Protection Committee (CPC)
has discussed a target for global temperature increase by 2050 of 1.5°C. The goal is to identify key
items that can be measured with existing resources or without much extra effort such as vehicle miles
traveled.
Ms. Hope distributed and reviewed Edmonds 2050 Forecasted Emissions, noting the largest emission
sources are passenger travel and residential electricity. She reviewed strategies to achieve the
following by 2035 and 2050 and input from CPC members:
• Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through more sustainable land use patterns (TOD, local
efficiency)
• Reduce VMT by improving transit systems
• Reduce VMT by promoting activity transportation
• Promote carpooling and vehicle sharing
• Promote electric vehicles and other low -carbon vehicles
• Reduce material consumption, waste generation and resource depletion
• Replace fossil fuels with renewable energy resources for energy that is supplied to the
community
• Improve the efficiency of existing buildings and infrastructure
• Improve efficiency of new buildings
• Increase carbon sequestration
Questions and discussion included 100% renewable energy for municipal facilities by 2019; reduction
in passenger travel in gas -powered versus electrical vehicles (EV); increased manufacture of EV; the
public's increased interest in EV; infrastructure for EV; incentives for installing charging stations;
rationale for the CPC's recommended target for global temperature increase of 1.5°C temperature by
2050; annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction that would be required to hold global temperature
increase to 1 °C, 1.5°C, and 2°C by 2050; state legislation to reduce GHG), food waste; ways the City
could incentivize the goals; public outreach/education; and intent to measure improvement using
existing data.
Action: Presentation by Environmental Science Associates to full Council on August 6
4. Proposal for Personal Services Contract for Program Administrator at the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
No staff was present for this item.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m.
Packet Pg. 185
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Draft Urban Forest Management Plan
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Development Services
Preparer: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
Development of an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) began in 2017. Public process included
open houses, website information, press releases, various public meetings and two public hearings. A
first draft was reviewed by both the Tree Board and Planning Board. Some revisions were made and
the City Council reviewed the new draft and requested several other changes. These changes were
made and last reviewed by the City Council on August 7, 2018. No vote on adoption was taken.
After further discussion, a supplemental process began that included a small informal team of City staff,
Tree Board members, a Planning Board member, and one or two active citizens. The process resulted in
another round of edits which were then incorporated by the consultant into a new ("May 2019") revised
draft UFMP.
The revised draft was sent to the Tree Board in early June and presented at the Tree Board's June 6
meeting, where a City staff person summarized the UFMP changes. However, because it was still new
information, Tree Board members had little comment.
At the June 11 meeting of the City Council's Planning, Public Safety, and Personnel Committee, the
Council members discussed and approved moving adoption of the revised UFMP forward for
consideration by the full City Council. On June 25, after receiving several comments on the UMFP, the
full Council discussed the document (see attached minutes) and concurred on providing the Tree Board
a final chance to comment.
The Tree Board's most recent meeting was on June 27. Meeting notes are not yet available. However,
the Tree Board discussed the draft at the meeting. Afterward, Council member Buckshnis (the Council
liaison to the Tree Board) prepared a memo to summarize members' perspective. (See attached memo,
dated June 28.)
Staff Recommendation
Adopt the Urban Forest Management Plan
Narrative
In the past, certain questions have come up about the purpose of the UFMP and how it compares with
other cities' UFMPs. Below are brief explanations.
1. Does the Draft Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) deal with public properties or private
Packet Pg. 186
8.1
properties?
The Draft UFMP focuses to a great extent on things the City can do to manage trees on City -
owned property and the public rights -of -way. For private property, it largely focuses on
education, incentives, and information that can be provided to residents to encourage planting
the "right trees in the right place" and using best practices to manage trees on their property.
But it also goes further to say that the City should continue its process to update the code
regarding tree management, especially for development.
2. Is the Draft UFMP similar to an Environmental Impact Statement?
No, the Urban Forest Management Plan is intended to be a plan or policy guide about how trees
should be managed/encouraged within Edmonds. An Environmental Impact Statement, on the
other hand, is an analysis of certain impacts of a chosen project or proposal.
3. Is the Draft UFMP for Edmonds similar in scope to the UFMPs of other cities?
Yes, it is similar in scope to the UFMPs of some other jurisdictions, though different in detail.
Examples of other UFMPs in our area include those of Kirkland and Shoreline. (Everett has a
forest management plan but it is currenity only for public trees.)
A new revised draft UFMP (attached) is ready for final Council review. It includes changes that reflect
key public comments, for example:
More attention to native trees of our area
Re -write of Diseases and Pests section
Removal of map & references to specific tree planting "opportunity areas" (but still encouraging
planting)
Modification of statements not backed by scientific findings for our region
More background discussion of tree issues
Additional information about City regulations for development and permitting
Additional information on selecting trees ("right tree, right place")
Information on trimming trees
Caveat about applicability of public survey that had been done early in the UFMP process
Removal of references to specific dollar amounts represented by tree functions (but still
recognizing value of trees in many ways)
The revised draft UFMP keeps the same five key goals and the actions recommended to achieve
them. (The goals and actions are identified in a section called "How Do We Get There?")
They are repeated below:
1. Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage (Note: The original version only said
"Maintain...")
2. Manage public trees proactively
3. Incentivize protecting and planting trees on private property
4. Provide resources to community to educate/inform on tree planting & care
S. Promote "right tree, right place".
Adoption of the revised UFMP will help the City move forward to implement the document's
recommendations, which include important actions, such as:
Updating the tree code
Utilizing a city arborist
Updating the Street Tree Plan
Providing tree incentives
Establishing a tree bank.
Packet Pg. 187
8.1
Attachments:
Att. 1: EdmondsWA UFMP 2019_06_3 (1)
Att. 2: Council excerpt from 6.25.19
UFMP.Decision. pptx
DianeB Memo UFMP
Packet Pg. 188
� _
L
Y
� i i � i ■.1.+�
n a � u�
� �..
.ry4^�'Z� �' r r� Vie• o f � i r
� ��� .. � 4 r����.'� ice. `} *• ' ^'�.
0
V
W
-`-NM1•10010101*
� Urban Forest Management Plan
May, 2019
8.1.a
c
IL
c
a�
E
a�
a�
Cu
c
m
d
L
0
LL
r_
L
L
r
M
to
I
0
0
I
T
0
N
IL
2
LL
M
a
c
0
E
w
CD
E
m
a
Packet Pg. 190
8.1.a
City of Edmonds
Urban Forest Management Plan
May, 2019
DAVEYI-.
Resource Group
Prepared for:
City of Edmonds
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Prepared by:
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
6005 Capistrano Avenue, Suite A
Atascadero, California 93422
Phone: 805-461-7500
Toll Free: 800-966-2021
Fax: 805-461-8501
www.davey.com/drg
Packet Pg. 191
8.1.a
Acknowledgments
CITY OF EDMONDS STAFF MEMBERS
Shane Hope, Director, Development Services
Carrie Hite, Director, Parks, Recreation,
and Cultural Services
Phil Williams, Director, Public Works and Utilities
Brad Shipley, Associate Planner
Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant
Terri Arnold, Deputy Director, Parks, Recreation and
Cultural Services Department
Rich Lindsay, Parks Maintenance Manager, Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Services Department
Debra Dill, Parks Senior Laborer, Parks, Recreation and
Cultural Services Department
Jennifer Leach, Environmental Education &
Sustainability Coordinator, Parks, Recreation
and Cultural Services Department
Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager,
Development Services Department
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager,
Public Works Department
CITY OF EDMONDS CITIZENS' TREE BOARD
Doug Petersen, Position 3 - Chair
Frank Caruso, Position 1 - Vice Chair
Gail Lovell, Position 2
William Phipps, Position 4
Barbara Chase, Position 5
Steve Hatzenbeler, Position 6
Vivian Olson, Position 7
Suzanne Jeugensen, Alt.
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Nathan Monroe, Position 4 - Chair
Matt Cheung, Position 3 - Vice Chair
Philip (Phil) Lovell, Position 1
Daniel Robles, Position 2
Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig, Position 5
Alicia Crank, Position 6
Todd Cloutier, Position 7
Mike Rosen, Alt.
CITY OF EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Mike Nelson, Position 2 — Council President
Diane Buckshnis, Position 4 — Council President Pro Tem
Kristiana Johnson, Position 1
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Position 3
Dave Teitzel, Position 5
Thomas Mesaros, Position 6
Neil Tibbott, Position 7
Cli E D 41
0
DAV FF
Resource Group
Packet Pg. 192
8.1.a
Table of Contents
owk
Executive Summary
Scope & Purpose
Plan Foundation
Introduction
Community
Benefits and Challenges of the Urban Forest
What Do We Have?
r
Edmonds' Urban Forestry History Regulatory Framework
Regional Plans and Legislation Regional Urban Forestry Resources
Urban Tree Canopy Analysis Urban Forestry Practices - Case Studies
Existing Urban Forest Practices
What Do We Want?
Stakeholder and Community Input
How Do We Get There?
Goals and Actions of the Plan
How Are We Doing?
Monitoring and Measuring Results
Appendices
Appendix A: References
Appendix B: Table of Figures
Appendix C: Community Survey Responses
Appendix D: Open House Summary Report
Packet Pg. 193
8.1.a
Executive Summary
Background &
Purpose
Urban forest simply means the trees in an urban
area. An urban forest management plan is a long-
term plan for managing trees in a city.
The purpose of the City of Edmonds Urban Forest
Management Plan is to provide guidance for
managing, enhancing, and growing trees in the City
of Edmonds over the next 20 years. Special emphasis
is placed on managing trees on public property and
along the public rights -of -way.
Public Involvement
;n Process
Public involvement has been part of developing and
finalizing the Urban Forest Management Plan. The
involvement has included open houses, website
postings, informal survey, press releases, and
submitted public comments, as well as formal public
meetings by the Tree Board, Planning Board, and
City Council.
Plan Overview and
Conclusion
Edmonds, like many cities in the Pacific Northwest,
once had large stands of old -growth trees that
included Douglas fir and Western red cedar. Most of
these were logged off years ago and development of
streets, homes, businesses, schools, churches, and
additional settlement followed. In some places, new
trees have grown up or been planted. For Edmonds
today, tree canopy coverage is estimated to be about
30.3% of the total city area.
Trees have many benefits, but also some challenges.
Selecting the right tree for a particular location
makes a difference in how the tree will perform and
thrive. Appropriate planting methods and tree care
are important too.
The Cty has a program of planting and caring for
trees in public places —such as City parks and along
various streets. In addition, the City has regulations
about certain aspects of trees on private property.
Notably, Edmonds is certified as a "Tree City USA"
city and supports an active Citizens Tree Board. The
Tree Board, as well as City staff, helps provide public
education and participation in volunteer events
to plant trees. Throughout the community, many
residents also value and take care of trees on their
property.
To promote future sustainability and urban forest
health, thoughtful planning and actions are needed.
The Plan identifies five long-range goals to help the
City move forward. The goals are:
1. Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage
2. Manage public trees proactively
3. Incentivize protecting and planting trees on
private property
4. Provide resources to the community
to educate/inform on tree planting and care
5. Promote "right tree, right place".
Specific action strategies are identified to address
each of the Plan's long-range goals. These would be
implemented over time, as resources are available,
to address priority needs. Furthermore, the Urban
Forest Management Plan should be reviewed every
five to ten years and updated as needed.
1 Scope & Purpose
Packet Pg. 194
8.1.a
Overview
The plan includes long-range goals and action
strategies to promote sustainability, species diversity,
and greater canopy cover. Publicly -managed trees
along streets, in parks, and at City facilities are
collectively referred to as the community urban
forest. Privately owned trees are also considered
part of the urban forest in this plan because of their
function and contribution to the sustainability of the
overall urban forest in Edmonds; however, the City
recognizes that it has a limited role in the care of
private trees.
Recognizing the significance of environmental and
socioeconomic benefits provided by trees and their
relationship with a high quality of life, the UFMP
aims to:
• Illustrate the value and benefits of trees.
• Promote shared vision and collaboration
between community residents.
• Establish benchmarks and metrics to monitor the
long-term success of management strategies.
• Enhance the health and sustainability of the
community urban forest.
• Increase the vital benefits that the trees provide
to Edmonds and the region.
• Ensure that resources are in place to support the
care and management of the community's trees.
This UFMP includes goals and action strategies for
the long-term and short-term in support of this
purpose. It identifies appropriate resources to
adequately manage community trees. It is intended
to remain flexible and dynamic, allowing for the
exploration and implementation of the actions as
funding and resources permit.
The development of the UFMP included a
comprehensive review of existing policies and
regulations, currentfunding and maintenance levels,
analysis of the extent, condition, and composition
of the existing tree resources, stakeholder concerns,
and community input.
Plan Foundation
Spending any amount of time outdoors in Edmonds
will reveal the abundant and diverse natural
resources found within City parks and surrounding
residences and businesses. Besides the obvious
amenities available to a city on the coastline of the
Puget Sound, another abundant natural wonder
in Edmonds is its trees. Interspersed amongst the
buildings and roads, trees provide the City with the
shade, fresh air, and softened landscape that help
people achieve the unique experience referred
to as; "an Edmonds kind of day." All of the trees
in Edmonds make up the City's urban forest tree
resource. Without active management, this urban
forest is at risk.
What What
Do We Do We
Have? Want?
How How Do I
Are We qm% We Get
Doing? There?
c
a
c
0
c
0
U_
c
E
L
0
r
M
c�
I
0
I
o�
0
N
a.
a
U)
a
0
w
Q
c
a�
E
M
0
ca
a
Scope & Purpose 2
Packet Pg. 195
8.1.a
In December 2016, the City adopted a Comprehensive
Plan that formally recognized that the community
places a high value on the conservation of the urban
forest. This Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP)
is intended to be an element that aligns in support
of the Comprehensive Plan. In particular, this UFMP
aligns with the intentions of, "providing a framework
for moving the Edmonds community toward a
sustainable future that integrates and responds
to environmental, economic, and social needs in a
way which meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs" (Comp Plan, 2016).
Thefollowing principlesfor urban forest management
set the framework for the UFMP:
• Optimize the ecosystem services provided by trees.
• Control tree maintenance costs to the community.
• Create pathways to stable and predictable funding.
• Mitigate risks and liabilities associated with trees.
The structure and organization of the UFMP are
based on the understanding of what we have, what
we want, how we get there, and how we are doing.
This structure, referred to as adaptive management,
is commonly used for resource planning and
management (Miller, R.W.,1988) and provides a good
conceptual framework for managing community
forest resources.
The plan development process involved a
comprehensive review and assessment of the
existing community tree resource, including
composition, value, and environmental benefits.
The process explored community values, existing
regulations, and policies related to community
trees. In addition, there were multiple stakeholders,
internal and external, who played a role in the
planning, design, care, and advocacy around the
community forest. These stakeholders include the
general public, City departments, the Citizens' Tree
Board, and Snohomish Public Utility District (PUD).
Each of these stakeholders contributed to the
development of this Plan.
What Do We Have?
Edmonds was founded along the coast of the Puget
Sound in 1890. Similar to the rest of the region,
Edmonds had forestlands that were logged and
waters that were fished. As Edmonds has grown
in population, the forest has been urbanized and
divided for parks, homes, and businesses. Recognizing
the role of trees in the community and the necessity
to manage them, the City drafted a Streetscape
Plan in 2002 that included tree planting guidelines
as part of the general aesthetic goals for the
community. Revised in 2006 and again in 2015,
elements of this Plan introduced tree care policy
that has since been the source for many of the City's
tree management decisions.
In terms of regulations, the care for the urban forest
is generally understood to be required by the Growth
Table 1: Benchmark Values (2017)
The City
Acres 6,095
Population 41,841)
Land lower
Tree Ca nopw
30%
brass & Vegetation
27%
1 m pervio us Su rfaces
34%
Bare Soils
2%
Open Water
7%
Tree Canopy Corer
Maximum Potential Canopy 57%
Investment
Tree Care Per Capita
$7.74
.3 Scope & Purpose
Packet Pg. 196
8.1.a
Management Act of 1990. Guidance is provided by
the City's Comprehensive Plan (2016), the Parks,
Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016), and the
Streetscape Plan (2015). These primary documents
define the reach of existing regulations and policies
within which care for the urban forest is mandated:
• Comprehensive Plan (2016) - Environmental
Quality Goal A - "...Protect environmental
quality within the Edmonds community
through the enforcement of community -based
environmental regulations."
• Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016)
- Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation
Goal 4 — "Preserve and provide access to
natural resource lands for habitat conservation,
recreation, and environmental education."
• Objective 4.5 - Expand the urban forest and
increase tree canopy in Edmonds.
• Action Plan 4.G - Steward the urban forest using
appropriate maintenance of street and park
trees, clear removal and replacement policies
and providing information about urban forestry
to property owners.
• Streestcape Plan (Revised 2015) - Celebrate
Sustainable Practices. In redesigning the corridor,
it is critical that the new interventions improve the
street's performance. This includes enhancing the
street environment and gateways for pedestrian
benefits through an Urban Forestry program in
the Downtown/Waterfront area.
The urban forest is a combination of both public
and private trees. Any trees that the City has direct
control of and responsibility for are defined as the
community tree resource. This includes public
trees in parks, along rights -of -way, and around City
facilities. Managing any resource begins with defining
what is being managed and establishing benchmarks
along with clearly defined goals and expectations.
While public trees along major arterials and high -
profile areas are well-known and routinely cared for
by City staff, other public street trees are expected
to be maintained by the adjacent property owner.
Aside from individual development applications, the
City does not have a method to take an inventory
or track the history, status, or location of public
trees. In addition, providing adequate care for trees
requires a level of knowledge and a skill set that
many property owners do not have.
The planning process for this UFMP included an
assessment of tree canopy. The results of the study
provide a clear picture of the extent and distribution
of tree canopy across Edmonds, benchmarking the
average tree canopy cover at 30.3%. Analysis of
historical change estimates that the City has lost 114
acres of its tree canopy since 2005. In 2005, there
was an average tree canopy cover of 32.3%.
The primary challenges and opportunities for urban
forest management are:
• Private owners control the majority of tree
canopy (83.0%) with few regulations to limit
tree removal, except when the trees are
associated with development or are within an
environmentally critical area.
• There is limited knowledge about the condition
of trees in the urban forest.
• There is an estimated 1,651 acres is
theoretically available for planting to expand
the urban forest canopy'.
The views of scenic places are fundamental to
Edmonds' identity as a community and require
balanced consideration with the care of the urban
forest. Scenic views are highly valued in long-
established development. At the same time,
appreciation of trees —especially "the right trees in
the right place" —is a value shared by most residents.
1 This estimate is partly based on an analysis of low-lying
vegetation areas.
c
a
c
a�
E
m
a�
c
0
U_
c
E
L
0
r
M
I
co
0
on
I
0
N
(L
2
U_
D
a
U)
c
0
E
w
r
r
Q
c
a�
E
a
Executive Summary 4
Packet Pg. 197
Land Cover
8.1.a
V
Bare Soils
2%
Grass/Vegetatic
27%
Figure 1: Land Cover
City i.- ruins
Tree canopy
orassJ1-ow-E~y3ng Vegetation ,
Impervious Surfaces
Bare Soil
open Water
N
A
0 025 0.5 1
Miles
5 Executive Summary
-anopy
npervious
34%
N"
Figure 1: Land Cover
a
Packet Pg. 198
8.1.a
17
What Do We Want?
The plan development process included substantial
outreach to public stakeholders, residents, and
non-profit agencies. The process provided a broad
perspective of the challenges that face Edmonds'
urban forest. Through open house forums and
public meetings, the City has found an engaged
set of residents with varying opinions on matters
pertaining to the care of the urban forest.
City Staff were also consulted during plan
development, with City code and public safety
being the main considerations when making tree
care decisions. City Staff will often take a reactive
approach to tree management by performing work
on trees as problems are discovered, but they also
look for opportunities to plant trees in strategic
public places.
Open house forums and public meetings provided perspective
on community interests and concerns about the urban forest.
In general, stakeholders from both the community
and City Staff share the following desired outcomes
for the UFMP:
• Preservation and Enhancement of Tree Canopy
• Sustainability, Health, and Safety of the
Community Tree Resource
• Preservation and Enrichment of Wildlife and
Habitat
• Increased Outreach and Education
• Increased Collaboration with Volunteers and
Non-profit Groups
• Strategies and Policies to Minimize Potential
Tree Conflicts
Executive summary 6
Packet Pg. 199
8.1.a
How Do We Get
There?
The long-range strategic goals provided in this
Plan are proposed to address the three components
of a sustainable urban forestry program through
specific actions:
Urban Forest Asset Actions - which are intended
to improve the urban forest resource over
the next 20 years by developing detailed
How Are We Doing?
The UFMP presents opportunities to care for the
urban forest in Edmonds by providing an overarching
framework for urban forestry operations, policies,
and programs. It presents a high-level review of
urban forest management in the City, including
historical context and an exploration of the benefits
of Edmonds' trees. Building upon that information,
the Plan connects the community's vision for the
urban forest with appropriate goals and actions.
expectations for the urban forest. This Plan provides various goals to pursue along a
20-year timeline concluding in 2038. These short
• Municipal Resource Actions - which are and long-term goals will be achieved by adapting
intended to drive improvements in City policy the Plan according to a five-year cyclical review of
and practices by developing efficiency and operational objectives. The success of the UFMP
alignment of efforts within City departments. will be measured through the realization of goals
• Community Resource Actions - which are and will be demonstrated through the health of
intended to build stronger community the urban forest and increased environmental
engagement and public participation in urban benefits. Ultimately, it will lead to an enhancement
forest stewardship. of tree canopy throughout the City. Furthermore,
the greatest measurement of success for the UFMP
will be how successful it is in meeting community
expectations for the care and preservation of the
community tree resource.
Goal 1- Maintain citywide canopy coverage
Goal 2 - Manage public trees pro -actively
Goal 3 - Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private
Goal 4 - Provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree planting and care
Goal 5 - Promote "Rieht tree. rieht glace"
Youth volunteers helping with tree resource management.
7 Executive Summary
Packet Pg. 200
8.1.a
Introduction
Trees play an essential role in the community
of Edmonds, providing numerous tangible and
intangible benefits to residents, visitors, neighboring
communities, businesses, and wildlife. Research
demonstrates that healthy urban trees can improve
the local environment and lessen the impact resulting
from urbanization and industry (U.S. Forest Service,
Pacific Southwest Division, 2017). Trees can improve
air quality, reduce energy consumption, help manage
stormwater, reduce erosion, provide critical habitat
for wildlife, and promote a connection with nature.
In addition to these direct improvements, healthy
urban trees increase the overall attractiveness of a
community. In Portland, Oregon, street trees were
found to add an average of $8,870 to homes' sales
price as well as reduce time on the market for home
sales by 1.7 days (Donovan et al., 2010). Studies
on the business benefits of trees have shown how
retail districts promote longer and more frequent
shopping and greater sales (Wolf, 2007). Urban
trees support a more livable community, fostering
psychological health and providing residents with a
greatersense of place (Kuo, 2003). Communitytrees,
both public and private, soften the urban hardscape
by providing a green sanctuary and making the City
of Edmonds a more enjoyable place to live, work,
and play. The City has emphasized the importance
of trees within the Comprehensive Plan (2016), so
much so that public trees are defined as a valued
community resource, a critical component of the
urban infrastructure, and a part of the City's identity.
Edmonds' trees are a valued community resource
Community
Early settlements were built in the City to access
natural resources, where shingle mills became the
primary industry. Although construction of the
Great Northern Railway along the waterfront was
expected to be the main source of growth in the
City, most growth occurred due to its proximity to
Seattle. Passenger ferry service has also helped the
town grow and prosper.
Edmonds' population, from 2017 State estimates, is
41,260 people and covers a land area of 8.9 square
miles. It is the third largest city in the county after
Everett and Marysville. By 2035, the population is
expected to be 45,550.
The urban forest in this community is defined by its
public and privately managed trees. Through parks
and public rights -of -way, the City maintains a diverse
population of trees intended for city streetscapes
(typically nursery grown hardwoods), as well as
native trees (naturally regenerating conifers and
deciduous trees). Privately managed trees may be
remnant forest trees connected with early logging
history, naturally growing native trees and even
invasive hardwoods.
Community Vision for the UFMP
Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan provides a vision of
the City as an attractive, sustainable community for
all ages. It specifically recognizes the value of trees
as contributing to that vision and directs that an
urban forest management plan be used as a guide for
decisions on managing the forest resource, especially
focusing on public land and rights -of -way. For private
lands, the UFMP would guide education and incentives
to encourage good tree management practices.
c
a
c
a�
E
as
a�
c
0
U-
c
E
L
0
M
to
I
0
I
Cn
0
N
a
U-
D
a
U)
c
0
w
r
r
r
Q
c
a�
E
a
Introduction 8
Packet Pg. 201
8.1.a
Benefits and
Challenges of the
Urban Forest
Urban and natural forests work constantly to mitigate
the effects of urbanization and development, which
protects and enhances lives within the community.
In general, there are five (5) important ways in
which trees provide benefits: Water Quality, Carbon
Sequestration, Energy Savings, Air Quality, and
Socioeconomic benefits.
Water Quality
Urban stormwater runoff is a major source of
contamination for the Puget Sound and riparian
areas throughout Edmonds, threatening both human
health and wildlife, including salmon populations.
Requirements for surface water management
are becoming more stringent and costly for both
developers and the City.
By incorporating the right mix of urban trees into
stormwater management planning, runoff volumes,
peak stream flows and flooding incidents may all
be reduced; a strategy that may lessen the need
for constructing stormwater management facilities
and the cost of treatment to remove sediment and
other pollutants.
Typical overview of waterfront homes in Edmonds.
9 Introduction
Trees improve and protect water quality by:
• Intercepting Rainfall —Trees intercept rainfall in
their canopy, which act as a mini -reservoir. Some
water evaporates from the canopy and some
slowly soaks into the ground, reducing the total
amount of runoff (Xiao, et al., 2000). Canopy
interception also lessens soil compaction, which
in turn further reduces runoff.
• Increasing soil capacity and infiltration —
Root growth and decomposition increase
the capacity and rate of soil infiltration by
rainfall and snowmelt resulting in slower
percolation rates and increasing the filtration of
contaminants (Xiao, et al., 2007).
• Reducing soil erosion — Tree roots reduce
the flow and volume of stormwater runoff,
avoiding erosion and preventing sediments and
other pollutants from entering streams, rivers,
Lake Washington, and the Puget Sound (WA
Department of Ecology, 2011).
• Providing salmon habitat — Shade from trees
helps to cool warm urban runoff, which poses a
threat to anadromous fish, like salmon. Shade
from trees provides lakeside and riparian habitat
for salmon and cools water temperatures,
increasing dissolved oxygen, which is essential to
salmon survival (Puget Sound Partnership, 2012).
Packet Pg. 202
8.1.a
Carbon Sequestration
As environmental awareness continues to increase,
governments are paying particular attention to global
warming and the effects of greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions. As energy from the sun (sunlight) strikes
the Earth's surface it is reflected back into space as
infrared radiation (heat). Greenhouse gases absorb
some of this infrared radiation and trap this heat in
the atmosphere, increasing the temperature of the
Earth's surface. Many chemical compounds in the
Earth's atmosphere act as GHGs, including methane
(CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO), water
vapor, and human -made gases/aerosols. As GHGs
increase, the amount of energy radiated back into
space is reduced, and more heat is trapped in the
atmosphere. An increase in the average temperature
of the earth is resulting in changes in weather, sea
levels, and land -use patterns, commonly referred
to as "climate change." In the last 150 years, since
large-scale industrialization began, the levels of
some GHGs, including CO2, have increased by 25%
(U.S. Energy Information Administration).
Trees absorb atmospheric carbon, which reduces
greenhouse gases. The carbon -related function of
trees is measured in two ways: storage (total stored
in tree biomass) and sequestration (the absorption
rate per year) (Jo, et al., 1995). Urban trees reduce
atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in two ways:
• Directly —Through growth and the sequestration
of CO2 as wood and foliar biomass.
• Indirectly — By lowering the demand for air
conditioning, thereby reducing the emissions
associated with electric power generation and
natural gas consumption.
Stormwater runoff from streets needs to be controlled. Trees
will slow and intercept stormwater, reducing the burden on
stormwater infrastructure.
Energy Savings
Electric and gas utilities develop energy conservation
solutions to keep rates low for their customers,
reduce their need to build new lines, and, ultimately,
to be good environmental stewards. Energy services
delivered to Edmonds residents are provided by
Snohomish County Public Utility District (SNOPUD).
This organization recognizes how trees can reduce
energy consumption and encourages Edmonds
residents to consider trees as a cooperative strategy
for improving energy conservation (SNOPUD, 2017).
Urban trees and forests modify the environment
and conserve energy in three principal ways:
• Shade dwellings and impervious surfaces —
Impervious surfaces in 2011 were assessed
as 34% of the total land base (Edmonds,
2017). Shade from trees reduces the amount
of radiant energy absorbed and stored by
these impervious surfaces, thereby reducing
the urban heat island effect, a term that
describes the increase in urban temperatures
in relation to surrounding locations (Simpson
& McPherson, 2000). Shade from trees also
reduces the amount of energy used to cool a
structure (Simpson, 2002).
• Transpiration —Transpiration releases water
vapor from tree canopies, which cools
the surrounding area. Through shade and
transpiration, trees and vegetation within
an urban setting modify the environment
and reduce heat island effects. Temperature
differences of more than 97 (5°C) have been
observed between city centers without canopy
cover and more forested suburban areas
(Akbari, et al., 1997).
• Wind reduction — Trees can reduce wind speeds
by up to 50% and influence the movement
of air and pollutants along streets and out of
urban canyons. By reducing air movement into
buildings and against conductive surfaces (e.g.,
glass, metal siding), trees can reduce conductive
heat loss.
a
Introduction 10
Packet Pg. 203
8.1.a
Air Quality
Urban trees improve air quality in five
fundamental ways:
• Reducing particulate matter (e.g., dust and smoke)
• Absorbing gaseous pollutants
• Shade and transpiration
• Reducing power plant emissions
• Increasing oxygen levels
They protect and improve air quality by intercepting
particulate matter (PM10), including dust, ash, pollen,
and smoke. The particulates are filtered and held in
the tree canopy where they are eventually washed
harmlessly to the ground. Trees and forests absorb
harmful gaseous pollutants like ozone (0), nitrogen
dioxide (NO), and sulfur dioxide (SO). Shade and
transpiration reduces the formation of 03, which
is created during higher temperatures. Scientists
are now finding that some trees may absorb more
volatile organic compounds (VOC's) than previously
thought (Karl, T. et al 2010; Science NOW, 2010).
VOC's are a class of carbon -based particles emitted
from automobile exhaust, lawnmowers, and other
human activities.
By reducing energy needs, trees also reduce
emissions from the generation of power. And,
through photosynthesis, trees and forests increase
oxygen levels.
The needles of these douglas fir trees help improve air quality.
Aesthetic, Habitat, Socioeconomic,
and Health Benefits
While perhaps the most difficult to quantify, the
aesthetic and socioeconomic benefits from trees may
be among their greatest contributions, including:
• Beautification, comfort, and aesthetics
• Shade and privacy
• Wildlife habitat
• Opportunities for recreation
• Reduction in violent crime
• Creation of a sense of place and history
• Reduced illness and reliance on medication and
quicker recovery from injury or illness
Some of these benefits are captured as a percentage
of property values, through higher sales prices where
individual trees and forests are located.
In addition, trees and forests have positive economic
benefits for retailers. There is evidence that trees
promote better business by stimulating more
frequent and extended shopping and a willingness
to pay more for goods and parking (Wolf, 2007).
Trees and forestlands provide important habitat
(foraging, nesting, spawning, etc.) for mammals,
birds, and fish and other aquatic species, along
with limitless opportunities for recreation, offering
a healthful respite from the pressures of work and
everyday stress.
11 Introduction
Packet Pg. 204
8.1.a
Tree Selection related to
Location and Other Factors
Selecting tree species that are appropriate for the
expected functions, maintenance requirements, and
locations in which they are planted is important.
Generally, native trees should be considered for
planting or replacement whenever practical.
Along City streets, relatively compact trees that
add color and interest, without tending to upheave
pavement, are typically desirable. An example is the
Bowhall maple, which has been used in numerous
street -side locations in Edmonds. When street
trees are planted on the same side of the street as
SnoPUD overhead power lines, additional caution
is needed in selecting appropriate species. These
poles also usually carry major communication lines.
Such facilities are often located at the very edge of
the City's rights -of -way or in planter strips between
the sidewalk and the curb. Trees should be selected
that do not result in the need for frequent topping
or heavy pruning to keep them underneath the
communication space on PUD poles, which can be
as low as 15 feet above ground level.
In large spaces, native coniferous trees may be very
appropriate. Some of these species (such as Douglas
fir) can grow very tall (up to 200 feet) and wide (30
feet). They are well -suited to the Pacific Northwest
climate and have needles year-round. Also, various
types of deciduous trees, including maple and oak,
may be appropriate in large spaces.
In view areas and in many relatively small spaces,
lower -growing or less -spreading trees may be a
good choice. For example, vine maples have colorful
leaves in autumn and at mature height are generally
no more than 15 feet tall. However, the branches of
this species can spread wide, up to 20 feet. Other
species, even fruit trees and small specimen trees,
may fit well in settings where tree height or width
needs to be limited.
In critical areas where wildlife habitat exists, native
trees should generally be chosen for planting.
Depending on the type of habitat and space
availability, such trees could include Western red
cedar, Douglas fir, alder, and dogwood.
A mix of large and small trees in a park.
Introduction 12
Packet Pg. 205
Right tree, right place
8.1.a
Factors to consider when selecting a tree to plant.
Planting a tree is something that provide a sense
of accomplishment and something to admire for
decades. However, it is not a decision that should
be made without careful consideration. When
considering what tree to plant and where to plant it,
one should remember the widely used phrase "Right
Tree, Right Place." Choosing the right tree depends
on many factors including soil type, climate, and the
amount of space the tree will have both underground
and overhead.
It is important to choose a tree that does not require
more space in the future than a site can provide. To
avoid any conflicts with overhead obstructions (e.g.,
power lines, utility poles, buildings) or underground
obstructions (e.g., pipes, building foundations),
consider the tree's height, root growth, and shape
at maturity. While above -ground growth is a little
easier to envision, a tree needs plenty of room to
grow underground too; tree roots can extend up
to two to three times the width of the crown (the
leaves and branches of the tree).
Apart from the physical space available for a tree to
grow, one may consider whether the property is in a
view shed and how the tree at maturity will impact
the views.
Trees in streetscapes can grow into conflict with sidewalks.
1. The tree's purpose will impact the suitability of
different tree species, whether used for shade,
aesthetic beauty, wind protection, screening, or
other purposes.
2. Size and location of the tree, including available
space for roots and branches, affects the decision
on which species to plant.
3. Crown form or shape varies among species,
including round, oval, columnar, V-shaped, or
pyramidal shapes. Consider how the shape of the
tree works in the space available.
Note on Native Trees: Edmonds was once covered in
forests of old growth Douglas fir, western red cedar,
and western hemlock. While these trees were once
the right tree in the right place, they often may not
be appropriate for urban environments. In natural
conditions, a Douglas fir can grow to more than
200 feet in height with a diameter of five to eight
feet. While the City's parks and the larger zoned
properties (12,000 — 20,000 square foot minimum
lot size) primarily located in north Edmonds may
provide sufficient growing space for these large native
species, they may not be appropriate landscape
trees within the Edmonds "bowl area" with its more
dense development and view concerns.
� 0.
Tree roots lifting a sidewalk.
13 Introduction
Packet Pg. 206
8.1.a
Trees and Views
To some people, trees are the view and to others, trees
block the view. The City of Edmonds is blessed with
magnificent views of Puget Sound and the Olympic
Mountain range. These views add to the quality of
life here, as well as to property values. When views
become obstructed, enjoyment of one's property as
well as property values may be impacted. The City's
Comprehensive Plan has many policies recognizing
the protection of public views (views from parks or
view corridors down streets and at street ends), but
does not specifically address private view protection.
Not all areas of Edmonds have views of Puget
Sound and the Olympics. While a view shed study
of the City of Edmonds has not been completed,
the primary view areas are located in the Bowl and
the properties on the west facing slopes of north
Edmonds. When considering planting trees in these
view areas, lower growing trees will help preserve
the views of neighboring properties.
Topping of trees for views is often the first
consideration of landowners. However, topping is not
generally recognized as good arboricultural practice.
A topped tree requires periodic maintenance to
maintain its reduced size. That can become expensive
in the long-term. Also, conifers will often form a
An example of skirting -up; the lower limbs on this tree have
been removed to provide drivers with a clearer view.
weakened top as the side branches all try to grow
up. In addition, the cut top often becomes an entry
site for decay organisms that weaken the tree and
increase the danger of a top breaking in high winds.
For broad-leaved trees such as maple, madrone or
oaks, severe topping is even more damaging. It can
seriously harm the tree's health and cause various
safety hazards.
While views are important, otherfactors such as critical
areas must also betaken into consideration. The north
Edmonds view shed is associated with significant
slopes (potential landslide hazards are slopes 40%
and greater) as well as a historic landslide area that
has specific regulations that apply to development
in that area (Chapter 19.10 ECDC — Earth Subsidence
and Landslide Hazard Areas) in addition to critical
area regulations. The mechanical and hydrogeological
benefits which trees and other vegetation provide
to maintain slope stability and reduce erosion are
well documented. Tree maintenance activities that
maintain the health of existing trees will also help
maintain slope stability.
A landowner should explore alternative options to
tree removal or topping. Below is a list of several
trimming practices derived from Vegetation
Management: AGuide for Puget Sound Bluff Property
Owners (Ecology Public 93-31) which can be used in
combination to create views without compromising
tree health or slope stability.
View -enhancing Pruning Alternatives for Conifers
1. Windowing
2. Interlimbing
3. Skirting -up
• Note: In any pruning practice or combination,
60% or more of the original crown should be
retained to maintain tree health and vigor. The
removal of too much live foliage can reduce
the tree's ability to supply food to the roots,
thereby weakening them.
Windowing. This pruning practice allows a
view "window" through the existing foliage of
the tree's canopy. In pruning major limbs and
a
Introduction 14
Packet Pg. 207
8.1.a
branch whorls, sections that obscure a view are
removed. Many people find that this technique
creates an aesthetically pleasing effect.
• Interlimbing. The removal of entire branch
whorls or individual branches throughout the
canopy allows more light to pass through, as
well as reducing wind resistance of the tree.
This practice can be used in conjunction with
windowing to improve views.
• Skirting -up. Limbing the tree up from the bottom
allows a clear line of sight. Instead of an obscuring
mass of foliage, the tree trunk is the only object
between you and the view. This technique is
useful when the tree in question is located high
on the bluff face or upon the tableland. Relatively
more branches can be removed with this
technique because the lower branches contribute
less nutrients to the tree than higher branches.
Pruning Broad-leaved Trees
Pruning and trimming of broad-leaved trees is usually
more complicated, especially for trees grown in the
wild. Generally, short-lived species such as alder,
willow and Bitter cherry are not worth pruning,
while trees like madrona, white oak, bigleaf maple,
and vine maple will warrant the expense. Crown
reduction is one of the most common methods that
arborists use to control the size of the tree and keep
its shape perfect. This method involves reducing the
foliage of the tree while still preserving the general
structure of the crown; doing this successfully trims
the overall shape of the tree and controls its size.
In a general sense, limbs that are located on the
uppermost portion of the tree canopy are cut shorter
in order to decrease the tree's height. However, they
are only removed to the next lateral growth to be
able to ensure that they heal faster and grow again
properly. It is highly recommended that only 20%
or less of the tree's canopy should be cut at once in
order to avoid the tree from suffering.
Properties owners should consult a certified arborist
prior to undertaking any tree maintenance activity.
Challenges
Developing and caring for a healthy urban forest
requires the coordination of many different
stakeholders, with a clear vision, and dedicated
resources. As such, the urban forest intersects with
many other elements of the city. This can result in
conflict or challenges including:
• Conflicts with Buildings and Infrastructure -
Roots and branches of trees can damage nearby
sidewalks, utility lines, and buildings.
• Hazard Trees - Trees can create hazards to the
community. Storm events, accidents, improper
maintenance, and the natural death of trees can
all create structural weaknesses for trees and the
surrounding area.
• View Issues - Edmonds is known for the
majestic views of the Puget Sound. It is possible
for trees to block these views if they grow too
large or were planted in improper locations.
• Maintenance - Trees are living infrastructure.
As such, they require active and regular
maintenance. Structural pruning, irrigation, and
the management of pests and diseases are some
critical maintenance practices that must occur to
ensure a healthy and vibrant urban forest.
• Choice of Tree Species - Different tree species have
different needs, growth patterns, and resistances
to pests and diseases. A diverse palette of species
improves the resilience of the urban forest.
A tree with multiple stems may become a hazard without
15 Introduction
proper care.
Packet Pg. 208
8.1.a
What Do We Have?.
To effectively manage the urban forest, it's essential
to have knowledge and understanding of what exists
today. This section lays the groundwork for the
UFMP with historical context, current policies and
practices and understanding about the existing state
of the urban forest.
History of Urban
Forestry in Edmonds
Trees have been an important part of the City's
character and economy since its founding. However,
to understand and manage the urban forest has
depended upon which trees are being considered and
where the trees were located. This is evident from
the various locations where trees are referenced in
the City code as well as the variety of departments
whose staff oversee tree related matters. Edmonds
had been designated by the National Arbor Day
Foundation as a Tree City USA since 2011, but has
had city staff in different departments managing
tree issues within the City for decades.
Recognizing the role of trees in the community and
the necessity to manage them, the City drafted a
Streetscape plan in 2002 that included tree planting
guidelines as part of the general aesthetic goals of
the community. Revised again in 2006 and 2015,
elements of this plan introduced tree care policy
which has been the source for much of the City's
tree management decisions ever since.
In 2010, the City formed the Edmonds Citizens'
Tree Board to assist in the development of tree
ordinances and to encourage the planting and
maintaining of trees. This is an early example of
the City taking steps towards management of tree
resources as an integrated ecosystem of both public
and private trees. In 2015, one of the efforts of this
board was a proposal to the City for updated tree -
related municipal ordinances. These proposed tree
codes, through a public comment period, were
rejected in part due to public concerns about private
property rights, but also because the City felt that it
had insufficient tree policy direction to warrant the
recommended codes.
From these related events, it's clear that the
community has assumed an increasing level of care
for the urban forest that would benefit from long-
term strategic planning. Increasing regulations from
the State and Federal Government for environmental
stewardship requirements have also played a
significant role in defining the level of care for the
urban forest that exist in Edmonds today.
Of special note are three policy sources that directly
influence the management of urban forestry
and land use in Edmonds; The Washington State
Growth Management Act (1990), the Edmonds
Comprehensive Plan (2016), and the Edmonds Parks
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan (2016) (The
PROS Plan is also an element of the Comprehensive
Plan.) Their backgrounds, roles, and influences on
the development and operation of Edmonds urban
forest are discussed below.
Big trees were common in Edmonds before its settlement.
c
�a
FL
c
(D
0
L
0
U_
c
0
0
r
M
to
0�
CD
0
N
a
U_
M
c
0
E
w
T
a
c
aD
E
0
0
Q
Introduction 16
Packet Pg. 209
8.1.a
Growth Management Act (1990)
In 1990, the State Legislature adopted the
Washington State Growth Management Act (Chapter
36.70A RCW) on the basis that uncoordinated
and unplanned growth posed a threat to the
environment, sustainable economic development
and the overall quality of life in Washington. Unique
among states, the Act requires that municipalities
prepare their own comprehensive plans that provide
for growth and development in a manner that is
locally and regionally consistent, achievable, and
affordable. All cities and counties in Washington are
required to adopt critical areas regulations by the
Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA defines
critical areas as:
"Critical areas" include the following areas and
ecosystems:
a. Wetlands;
b. Areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers
used for potable water;
c. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas;
d. Frequently flooded areas; and
e. Geologically hazardous areas. I�+*
The state of Washington +' ,
requires the City of Edmonds
to manage and protect it's
critical areas.
` 1889
Common ground vegetation in wetland areas
Cities are required to include the best available
science in developing policies and regulations to
protect the functions and values of critical areas.
Further to that end, jurisdictions must review,
evaluate, and, if necessary, revise their critical areas
ordinances per an update schedule.
Edmonds has an outstanding inventory of critical
areas and protection of these critical areas overlaps
with the protection of the urban forest. The trees
in the urban forest increase soil security to protect
wetlands, waterways and flooded areas, and the
branches and canopy provide ample real estate for
wildlife to call home. It is important that the City
plan for all the trees in the urban forest as a whole,
not just critical areas.
This notion is reinforced in Washington
Administrative Code (365-190-060(1)) which
specifies when classifying forest land resources
that "Cities are encouraged to coordinate their
forest resource lands designations with their county
and any adjacent jurisdictions. Counties and cities
should not review forest resource lands designations
solely on a parcel -by -parcel basis."
Edmonds has established environmental qualitygoals
in support of the legislation and in order to protect
critical areas. Since the critical areas regulations
must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,
the Comprehensive Plan sets forth the underlying
policies for the jurisdiction's critical areas program.
wa
Trees help protect the function and benefits from critical areas.
17 what Do we Have?
Packet Pg. 210
8.1.a
The Comprehensive Plan (2016)
As an overarching guiding document, the
Comprehensive Plan aggregates other city visions and
plans into one cohesive document. The Comprehensive
Plan is structured by element, then goals, then policies.
The Comprehensive Plan contains 9 elements. These
elements include goals and policies that can be
directly supported through this UFMP. These are the
community sustainability elements of the plan and
include goals and policies associated with:
• Sustainability
• Climate Change Goals and Policies, including
support for the Kyoto Protocol and the US
Mayor's Climate Change Agreement
• Community Health
• Environmental Quality
The urban forest is a key component of the community
sustainability element. Goal A in this element seeks to
protect environmental quality and sets the first policy
(A.1) as to: Ensure that the city's natural vegetation,
especially native vegetation, associated with its urban
forests, wetlands, and other wildlife habitat areas are
protected and enhanced..." A.2 sets to protect and
retain the urban forest, native vegetation, and wildlife
habitat areas. This includes techniques such as tree
retention, which should be integrated into land use
and development codes. As the urban forest grows,
so too does the habitat and environmental quality.
The community culture and urban design element's
implementation involves tree policy as well. In this
element, the streetscape section defines the many
ways that trees enhance the community: "Trees are an
asset to the community. They help absorb stormwater,
provide habitat for wildlife, clean pollution from the air,
and give both summer shade and aesthetic pleasure."
In this way, the Comprehensive Plan addresses the
policy commitment to Community Health, through
the preservation and expansion of the urban forest.
Street trees are further explored in the Streetscape
Plan developed in 2002 by the Parks, Recreation, and
Cultural Services Department and updated in 2006.
The Streetscape Plan includes a Street Tree Plan for
the downtown corridor. In 2011 the City adopted a
"Complete Streets" program which accommodates
the needs of all users along streets, including a safe
space for pedestrians which necessitates a tree
management component. This section concludes
with Actions A.1 and A.2, which state that Edmonds
should update the Street Tree Plan and develop an
Urban Forest Management Plan by the end of 2017.
The community sustainability element also includes
two other sections that are interconnected with the
urban forest; Climate Change and Critical Areas.
Recognizing the importance of addressing the issues
surrounding the environment and climate change,
the City of Edmonds formally expressed support
for the Kyoto Protocols, adopted the U.S. Mayors
Climate Protection Agreement by Resolution No.
1129, and joined the International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) by Resolution No.
1130. A crucial component of these climate change
policies is the reduction of greenhouse gases with
several benchmarks:
1. By 2020, reduce overall emissions of green -house
gases in the state to 1990 levels;
2. By 2035, reduce overall emissions of greenhouse
gases in the state to twenty-five percent below
1990 levels;
3. By 2050, the state will do its part to reach global
climate stabilization levels by reducing overall
emissions to fifty percent below 1990 levels,
or seventy percent below the state's expected
emissions that year.
The Edmonds urban forest is vital to the success of
meeting these benchmarks. Trees reduce carbon
through many ways including; reducing energy
demand forshaded buildings, acquiringcarbon dioxide
for the photosynthesis, and sequestering carbon. The
potential for carbon sequestration is determined
by maximum tree sizes, lifespans, growth rates, and
tolerances to urban stress. Therefore, growing long-
lasting and healthy trees directly contributes to the
success of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan climate
change goals.
c
a
c
a�
E
as
c
0
U_
c
E
0
M
co
I
0
I
Cn
0
N
a
U_
D
a
c
0
E
w
r
r
Q
c
a�
E
a
What Do We Have? 18
Packet Pg. 211
8.1.a
The PROS Plan (2016)
The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS)
Plan provides comprehensive guidance on the
management and development of Edmonds' parks,
recreation and open spaces, and the services
provided by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Department. The PROS plan has been
regularly updated (1996, 2001, 2008, and 2014) to
remain relevant to Edmonds as the city evolves.
Edmonds updates the PROS Plan and Community
Cultural Plan on a six-yearcycle, in alignmentwith the
requirements of the Washington State Recreation
and Conservation Office (RCO) to maintain eligibility
for federal and state grant programs. To this end,
the PROS plan contains detailed data on numerous
species and habitats in the city. The PROS Plan is
also an important tool in meeting Washington's
Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements and
achieving the important citywide goals outlined in
the Strategic Action Plan (April 2015). The PROS Plan
defines seven goals, of which Goal 4.0 specifically
addresses urban forestry.
Goal 4.0 (Natural Resource and Habitat
Conservation) seeks to preserve and provide access
to natural resources for habitat conservation,
recreation, and environmental education. The
eight objectives discuss preserving and protecting
areas with critical habitats and natural resources.
Of special importance to the UFMP is Objective
4.5, which states "Expand the urban forest and
increase tree canopy in Edmonds". Under each
goal, the PROS Plan recommends projects and
initiatives. A recommended project (4.G) under Goal
4 is: "Steward the urban forest using appropriate
maintenance of street and park trees, clear removal
and replacement policies and providing information
about urban forestry to property owners." This
demonstrates the value of the urban forest to the
people of Edmonds as manifested through existing
official documents addressing the urban forest and
urban tree canopy.
19 what Do we Have?
Purchasing of Forested Properties
The City's policies with regard to the acquisition
of open space (including the potential purchase of
forested properties) are contained with the Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Land
acquisition is included in the capital project budget
and the PROS plan notes that "expansions of the
parks system will target the gaps identified in this
plan and take advantage of opportunities as they
emerge. Due to the constrained nature of Edmonds,
this approach will require vigilance and proactive
pursuit of potential land acquisition opportunities
for both parks and open spaces. The City's inclusion
of this item in the capital projects list recognizes
the importance of swift action when rare property
acquisition opportunities become available." A
specific policy addressing the purchase of forested
properties could be considered for adding to the
PROS plan to recognize the potential of maintaining
the City's tree cover through the selective purchase
of forest properties as opportunities arise.
Forested properties can be valuable acquisitions to maintain
City's tree cover.
Packet Pg. 212
8.1.a
Summary Considerations for
Planning
These documents demonstrate the existing
regulations and policies within which care for the
urban forest is mandated. It is clear from the scope
defined within these documents that the values of
the Edmonds community, and Washington State at
large, require that urban forest management include
strategies to improve the care and conservation
of all trees. This includes updating the Street Tree
Plan, consideration for improving and preserving
trees near waterways, critical areas, habitats,
and on private parcels. Equipped with this policy
background and mandate to manage the urban
forest, it's essential to plan with as much knowledge
about the community tree resource as possible.
�I
The PROS plan (2016) has specific goals for the City to steward
the urban forest.
Community Tree
Resource
Trees belonging to the public, in parks, along rights -of -
way and around City facilities are the community tree
resource. These trees can be the most actively managed
population by the City and provide the best indicators to
showcase its vision of a well -managed and sustainable
urban forest condition. A well -managed urban forest
is healthier and more resilient to pests, disease, and
climate fluctuations. As a result, a well -managed urban
forest is also more cost-efficient. As urban forests evolve
over time, managers revise their strategies for individual
tree species based on past performance and emerging
prospects. Because trees are relatively long-lived
organisms, urban forests, like those in Edmonds, are
often a combination of well -adapted, high-performance
species mixed with some species that may be less
desirable and require more attention.
There is a widely accepted guiding rule in tree resource
management that no single species should represent
greater than 10% of the total population, and no single
genus more than 20% (Clark et al, 1997). Achieving
a diverse population of trees can help to minimize
detrimental consequences in the event of storms,
drought, disease, pests, or other stressors that can
severely affect an urban forest and the flow of benefits
and costs over time. Catastrophic pathogens, such
as Dutch elm disease (Ophiostoma ulmi), emerald
ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) are both examples
of unexpected, devastating, and costly pests and
pathogens that highlight the importance of diversity
and the balanced distribution of species and genera.
Current operations in the City that care for the
community trees do not keep suitable records of their
tree resource to summarize within this UFMP. Publictrees
along major arterials or high -profile areas of the City are
well-known and routinely cared for by City Staff, but as
an overall management tool, the City does not maintain
data about these trees as a collective inventory of their
green infrastructure assets. Managing for appropriate
tree species can help control maintenance costs, reduce
damage to infrastructure, and manage the need for pest
and disease control measures.
a
What Do We Have? 20
Packet Pg. 213
8.1.a
Tree Canopy Cover
The amount and distribution of leaf surface area is
the driving force behind the urban forest's ability
to produce benefits for the community (Clark et al,
1997). As canopy cover increases, so do the benefits.
Tree canopy is the layer of leaves, branches, and
stems of trees and other woody plants that cover
the ground when viewed from above.
Understanding the location and extent of tree
canopy is critical to developing and implementing
sound management strategies that will promote the
smart growth and sustainability of Edmonds' urban
forest and the invaluable benefits it provides.
In addition to understanding the tree canopy as a
whole, the quality of the urban tree canopy is often
categorized by the amount of fragmentation. Often,
the health and diversity of the overall canopy will
vastly improve when there is less fragmented canopy,
and there are more linkages between multiple patches
of forest. These categories of canopy include:
• Core Canopy - Tree canopy that exists within
and relatively far from the forest/non-forest
boundary (i.e., forested areas surrounded by
more forested areas).
• Perforated Canopy - Tree canopy that defines
the boundary between core forests and
relatively small clearings (perforations) within
the forest landscape.
• Patch Canopy - Tree canopy of a small -forested
area that is surrounded by non -forested land cover.
• Edge Canopy - Tree canopy that defines the
boundary between core forests, and large
core forests and large non -forested land
cover features, approximately 328 feet. When
large enough, edge canopy may appear to be
unassociated with core forests.
The City of Edmonds completed a canopy assessment
in June 2017 using a heads -up digitizing approach
and high resolution (4.8 inch), leaf -on aerial imagery
captured on August 7th, 2015. The overall assessment
does not distinguish between publicly -owned and
privately -owned trees because trees provide benefits
to the community beyond property lines. The results
of the study provide a clear picture of the extent and
distribution of tree canopy within Edmonds.
The data developed during the assessment becomes
an important part of the City's GIS database. It also
provides a foundation for developing community
goals and urban forest policies. With these data,
managers can determine:
• The location and extent of canopy over time
(tracking changes)
• The location of available planting space
(potential planting area)
• The best strategies to increase canopy in
underserved areas
• The data, combined with existing and emerging
urban forestry research and applications, can
provide additional guidance in two ways:
• Finding a balance between growth and
preservation
• Identifying and assessing urban forestry
opportunities.
An example of perforated canopy in a park setting.
21 what Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 214
Canopy Cover Summary
The City of Edmonds encompasses a total area of
9.5 square miles (6,095 acres) with 1,844 acres of
tree canopy (Figure 1). This total area includes 8.9
square miles of land and 0.6 square miles of water.
By analyzing high -resolution aerial imagery, Davey
Resource Group (DRG) determined the following land
cover characteristics within the City of Edmonds:
• 30.3% existing canopy, including trees and
woody shrubs (525 acres)
• 1.6% (99 acres) dry vegetation and bare ground
• 6.6% (402 acres) open water, where tree canopy
is unfeasible
• 27.4% (1,670 acres) of grass and low-lying
vegetation
8.1.a
• 34.1% impervious surfaces, including roads,
parking lots, and structures (2,080 acres)
• From 2005 to 2015 tree canopy decreased from
32.3% to 30.3%
• Total potential canopy is 57.4%, considering
suitable planting sites (1,651 acres) and the
existing canopy (1,844 acres), for a total of
3,495 acres
• Private residential properties have most of the
canopy (83.0%), followed by public (12.9%), and
commercial (4.1%) properties.
• Among parks in Edmonds, Southwest County
Park has the most canopy cover (117 acres)
followed by Yost Memorial Park (44 acres) and
Meadowdale Beach Park (26 acres)
INS
Apr
{ _ Y4F
' , te r Rio .} '
..rye A , , �+... - ,r' -� � , � �• LL} • �y � a � _ �'�3, .� r ,'`-" „r,%, � �" �'' Js- ..'. 4 ' � �r�
Ad
VA .40
Detail image of canopy cover in portion of the Edmonds "bowl" area.
c
FL
c
a�
E
a�
a�
CU
c
M
0
LL
c
0
L
v
M
co
I
O
�I
O
N
a
tL
N
0
Q
C
t
V
Q
What Do We Have? 22
Packet Pg. 215
Land Cover
8.1.a
Water
7%
Bare Soils
2%
Grass/Vegetation
27%
Figure 1: Land Cover
City Limits
Tree Canopy
CraWLow-Lying Vegetation
impervious Surfaces
1 Bare Soil
M Open Water
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Figure 1: Land Cover
2.3 what Do we Have?
Packet Pg. 216
Canopy Fragmentation
As a part of the UTC assessment, Edmonds' existing
UTC was analyzed for fragmentation to discover the
distribution of canopy (Figure 3). The overall health 4 _
of the urban ecosystem is highly dependent on the
ability of the trees, plants, wildlife, insects, and
humans to interact collectively as a whole.
Often, the health and diversity of the overall canopy
will vastly improve by creating linkages between
multiple patches of forest.
a-
Canopy fragmentation data serves as a valuable
managementtool due to the importance of Edmonds'
critical areas and environmental stewardship. The
+
c
analysis found that Edmonds' urban forest includes
j
cc
the following:
L
—
O
• 10.3% (190 acres) of Core Canopy
U-
r-
Figure 2: Fragmentation Comparison
• 8.2% (151 acres) of Perforated Canopy
Wildlife corridors (bottom) link habitats and lead to
• 55.5% (1,023 acres) of Patch Canopy
improving habitat quality while fragmentation (top)
o
• 26.0% (480 acres) of Edge Canopy
leads to isolation and declining habitat quality.
--
Ir
e�y.1 r - .L
O
dL
y * {
CU
F41
Detailed image of canopy fragmentation showing canopy
categorized as core, perforated, edge and patch forest.
What Do We Have? 24
Packet Pg. 217
8.1.a
Forest Fragmentation
Patch Forest
56%
Core Forest
10%
Perforated Ta',.�+ 7D
Fo rest
8%
Edge Forest
26% 191j!I }I
Figure 3: Forest Fragmentation
' � y
r -LK:fir I:#{ .
it
C
14
�1'r0a'.
Ity Lim s
Core Forest
Ecige Forest
Patch Forest }
Perforated Forest i t
0 0.25 0.5 1.�:
IY1Res
Figure 3: Forest Fragmentation
25 What Do We Have?
Q
Packet Pg. 218
8.1.a
Park Canopy Cover
The City of Edmonds includes 47 parks covering 344
acres (5.6% of all land area) (Figure 4). Edmonds'
parks have an average tree canopy cover of 44.1%.
Within those parks, canopy varied depending on site
and size. Edmonds' largest park, Southwest County
Park (119 acres), has 117 acres of tree canopy and an
average canopy cover of 98.7%. The second-largest,
Yost Memorial Park (44 acres) has 41 acres of canopy
cover, which represents 93.5% of the land area. The
high canopy cover of Yost Memorial Park reflects
that it is one of the few areas of native vegetation
that remain in Edmonds. The park contains mixed
stands of douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), sitka
spruce (Picea sitchensis), western red cedar (Thuja
Canopy cover in Yost Park.
plicata), red alder (Alnus rugosa), bigleaf maple
(Acer macrophyllum) and western hemlock (Tsuga
heterophylla), which offer a glimpse into the natural
history of the area. Centennial Plaza is the smallest
park (less than 0.1 acres) with 0.02 acres of canopy
(9.9 % canopy cover).
Of the four largest parks (Southwest County, Yost
Memorial, Meadowdale Beach, and Pine Ridge), all
have high tree canopy potential (greater than 96.7%).
However, of these parks, only Pine Ridge Park is not
currently near maximum potential canopy.
An acceptable strategy is to focus attention on the
parks where there is a much larger gap between
current canopy cover and potential canopy cover. The
5 biggest parks are listed in Table 7 of this section .
c
FL
c
a�
m
a�
c
a�
L
0
LL
E
L
7
r
L
r
M
co
I
0
Cn
I
0
N
a.
D
a
U)
0
E
w
Q
c
CD
E
z
0
ca
Q
What Do We Have? 26
Packet Pg. 219
8.1.a
Tree Canopy By Park
Table 2: Tree Canopy of 5 Largest Parks
CanopyPark Name Total
Potential
CanopyAcres Acres
Southwest
..
1
County Park18.55 117.05
Yost Memorial
44.14 41.28
93.53 97.45
Park
Meadowdale
25.54 25.16
Beach Parma
98. 99.77 Southwest
County Park
Pine Ridge Park 23.78 21.36
89.83 96.66
Hutt Park
Hummingbird
Hill Park
B
D
e EmMr
each Park
Under 15%
{
15% — J41 'J4
45% - 60%
Over 60%
-
1L
h
...... . . . . . . .
n_ as
0 0.6 1
Wes Figure 4: Tree Canopy by Park
27 What Do We Have?
Seaview Park
Sierra Park
Maplewood
Park
Pine Ridge Park
a
Packet Pg. 220
8.1.a
Critical Areas
The Washington State Growth Management
(GMA) mandates that all cities and counties
Washington are required to adopt critical ar
regulations. The GMA states that critical ar
include the following categories and ecosystems:
• Wetlands
• Areas with a critical recharging effect on
aquifers used for potable water
• Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas
• Frequently flooded areas; and
• Geologically hazardous areas
• Biodiversity and Corridor Areas (Breeding and
Refuge)
Act
in • Nesting Habitat (great blue heron)
eas ♦ Sensitive Aquatic Habitat (Trout/Salmon)
eas
• Sensitive Habitat (bald eagle)
Analysis of critical areas in conjunction with tree
canopy can reveal the important relationship that
trees provide in the conservation and protection of
these environments. Two critical area designations
are especially important to urban forest management
in Edmonds; fish and wildlife habitat areas and steep
slopes (Tables 8 & 9).
Fish and wildlife habitat areas include high priority
habitats and species that have been identified for
conservation and management.
DRG analyzed the relationship between forest
fragmentation and the following priority habitat and
species list categories:
• Wetlands Area
Biodiversity areas and corridors, identified by the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, are
areas of habitat that are relatively important to
various species of nativefish and wildlife. In Edmonds,
most of the biodiversity areas and corridors are in
core (58.6%) or edge (21.4%) forest. This is congruent
with what theory would suggest, because corridors
are continuous areas of habitat.
Nesting habitat for the great blue heron is comprised
of several elements; the nesting colony, year-round
and seasonal buffers, foraging habitat, and a pre -
nesting congregation area. For a given nesting area,
habitats are delineated by a buffer created from the
outermost perimeter of great blue heron nests.
In addition, there is a larger seasonal buffer to reduce
human noise pollution during the breeding months
(February - September). Nesting habitat in Edmonds
is located primarily in non -forest areas (58%). This
value warrants further investigation to determine
optimal canopy levels.
Table 3: Acres of Sensitive Area by Fragmentation
Biodiversity Areas And Corridor 251.82 1.35 53.94 27.09 147.67 21.78
Nesting Habitat Area (Great Blue Heron)
2.55
0.03
0.64
0.00
0.40
1.48
Sensitive Aquatic Habitat Area
118.33
10.52
35.32
4.61
16.53
51.36
Sensitive Habitat Area
77.83
14.46
9.28
0.18
2.70
51.21
Wetlands Area
80.65
5.48
13.56 IlIM
0.51
1.76
59.36
c
a
c
a�
E
0
a�
c
a�
L0
U_
c
E
L
0
M
I
CD
0
CI
0
N
IL
2
U_
a
U)
c
0
E
w
r
r
r+
Q
c
a�
E
c�
a
What Do We Have? 28
Packet Pg. 221
8.1.a
Sensitive aquatic habitat is determined by in -stream
physical characteristics (e.g., temperature, water
quantity, structure, substrate conditions, etc.).
However, sensitive aquatic habitat is also strongly
influenced by watershed processes beyond the
waterline. This includes canopy cover, riparian
condition, large woody debris, impervious surfaces
and stormwater discharge, sediment delivery, road
location and maintenance, watershed hydrology,
and nutrient dynamics (Washington Department
of Fish and Wildlife, 2009). In Edmonds, 43.4% of
sensitive aquatic habitat is found in non -forest areas.
The second largest forest fragmentation category
for sensitive aquatic habitat is edge forest (29.9%).
Nesting habitat for bald eagles is typically defined by
areas of large, mature trees close to large bodies of
water and generally buffered from human activity
(Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2016). This nesting
behavior is reflected in the 11.9% of nesting area
located in edge type forests of Edmonds.
However, nest trees are often among the largest
trees in a forest patch (Department of Fish and
Wildlife, 2016). This tree preference is reflected in
18.6% of nesting habitat being found in patch forest.
Around wetlands, the Washington Department of
Ecology defines vegetated areas adjacent to aquatic
resources as buffers that can reduce impacts from
adjacent land uses (Washington Department of
Ecology, 2011). These buffers also provide some
of the terrestrial habitats necessary for wetland -
dependent species that require both aquatic and
terrestrial habitats. The quality of these buffers could
be described by their canopy fragmentation, where
73.6% of wetlands were classified in non -forest
areas, and 16.8% were classified in edge forest, with
only 2.2% in the core forest.
The protection of steep slopes against landslides and
erosion is a key benefit of vegetation (Washington
Department of Ecology, 2011). Trees provide several
benefits to the structural integrity of slopes and the
prevention of soil erosion:
Foliage intercepts rainfall, causing absorptive
and evaporative losses that reduce rainfall
available for infiltration.
Roots extract moisture from the soil which is
lost to the atmosphere via transpiration, leading
to a lower pore -water pressure.
Roots reinforce the soil, increasing soil shear
strength.
It is important to understand the significance of steep
slopes because of their influences on local wildlife
and habitat quality. For example, increased erosion
can negatively impact spawning salmon by increasing
sediment and particulates in streams and other water
bodies. In this way, riparian vegetation that prevents
erosion protects critical habitat for wildlife.
Most steep slopes (66.1%) are in areas with tree
canopy. This figure presents an excellent baseline, as
trees are a vital tool for securing soil and minimizing
erosion. Among all areas with slopes over 12 degrees,
66.1% of the area is canopy, 14.3% is impervious,
19.0% is pervious, and 0.6% is bare soil.
Table 4: Percent of Sensitive Area by Fragmentation
Biodiversity Areas And Corridor
Nesting Habitat Area (Great Blue Heron) 2.55 1.36 24.96 0.00 15.73 58.01
Sensitive Aquatic Habitat Area 118.33 8.89 29.85 3.89 13.97
Sensitive Habitat Area 77.83 18.58 11.92 0.23 3.47 65.80
Wetlands Area 80.65 6.79 16.81 0.63 2.18 73.60
29 What Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 222
8.1.a
Considerations for Planting
Opportunities
Edmonds' existing tree canopy covers 30.3% of the
City, and decision -makers can set a target canopy
cover goal to pursue. Regardless of the canopy
coverage goals established by the City, the following
are planting opportunities that may be pursued
in order to maintain and potentially increase the
existing canopy coverage:
• Incentivize tree planting on private property.
• Increase canopy with tree planting in areas of
patch and fragmented canopy to reduce forest
fragmentation and improve wildlife habitat and
corridors.
Conducting outreach to the community as an
important tool for engaging public interest and
support.
Define goals and identify actions that will support
these goal(s).
• Develop clear policies and standards to meet
the 30% native vegetation requirement codified
by ECDC 23.90.040.0 (Retention of Vegetation
on Subdividable, Undeveloped Parcels) in
undeveloped (or redeveloped) Subdividable lands
zoned as RS-12 or RS-20, that contain a stream or
stream buffer, or a wetland or wetland buffer.
Park trees in Edmonds.
Currently, forestry operations in the City do not
document the community tree resource according
to industry best management practices. A public
tree inventory is important because it provides
information on species diversity, forest age, and
relative performance of different tree species. An
inventory that is maintained with continued updates
also facilitates planning and prioritization of tree
maintenance duties. Based on this assessment, urban
forest managers have the following opportunities:
Establish and continually update a public tree
inventory.
Integrate maintenance cycles with the public
tree inventory database.
• Study genus/species compositions to ensure
best -management diversity recommendations
are being followed.
c
a
c
a�
0
c
a�
`0
U_
c
L
M
I
c�
0
CD
I
T
0
N
a
U_
M
c
0
E
w
a
E
a
What Do We Have? .30
Packet Pg. 223
8.1.a
Existing Urban
Forest Practices
There are three departments within the City of
Edmonds that have influence over the management
of the urban forest; Development Services (DS),
Public Works and Utilities (PW), and Parks, Recreation
and Cultural Services (PRC). Although they share
and communicate any issues related to tree care
and urban forest management, decision -making
authority is determined based on the location of the
trees. There is no specific staff person or leadership
team with overarching responsibilities forguiding the
management of the entire urban forest in Edmonds.
Tree Maintenance
Tree maintenance is important at all stages of tree
life, but is especially critical for young trees as they
benefit from early structural pruning and training.
Minor corrections, such as removing double leaders
or crowded branches, can be conducted at ground
Table 5: Decision Matrix for Urban Forest
Management in Edmonds
Locations
Department!Tree
City
Permits for Tree
Removal
Trees on Private
Development
Permits for Tree
Property
Services
Pruning
Permits for Tree
Planting
Hazardous Tree
Parks,
Inspections
Trees in Parks
Recreation and
Tree Pruning
g
Cultural
Tree Removal
Services
Tree Planting
Public Works
Hazardous Tree
Trees within
and Utilities
Inspections
City Rights -of-
(with Parks'
Tree Pruning
Way
assistance in
Tree Removal
downtown)
Tree Planting
31 What Do We Have?
level with minimal cost when a tree is young.
However, if left unattended, defects can evolve into
very expensive structural issues and increase the
risk of failure as trees mature, at which point it may
be impossible to correct the issue without causing
greater harm.
Over -mature trees require more frequent inspection
and removal of dead or dying limbs to reduce the
risk of unexpected failure. By establishing a budget
for maintenance, urban forest managers can plan
the necessary tree care at the appropriate life stage
when it is most beneficial and cost-effective.
At the City, tree maintenance is addressed most
frequently with reactive tactics. As issues related
to trees are identified by City Staff, work is
prioritized based on existing and available budgets.
Planning associated with tree management on
public properties is minimal with priority attention
given to ensuring the successful establishment of
new tree plantings and responding to hazardous
tree conditions. Currently, the Parks Department
performs certain routine tree inspections and
provides limited proactive maintenance activities
(typically associated with the care of trees after
planting to encourage successful establishment).
Within City rights -of -way, tree issues are uncovered
as part of routine safety inspections of sidewalks
and streets, where trees are only identified when
infrastructure is damaged by roots, or when tree
hazards are observed by public works staff. Similarly,
in City parks, trees will be prioritized for maintenance
when safety concerns are observed through routine
park maintenance activities.
Parks trees require routine inspections and maintenance for
public safety.
Packet Pg. 224
8.1.a
Tree Maintenance Budgets
The majority of tree maintenance costs are
accounted for as general line items through the
parks department budget. As part of the annual Tree
City USA application, departments will summarize
their expenses. In 2017, the Edmonds' urban forestry
expenditures were $7.74 per capita, which is more
than the minimum $2 per capita for Tree City USA
designation and more than the $7.50 national average
reported by the National Arbor Day Foundation.
Documented Edmonds' expenditures have been in
the range of $3 per capita in prior years.
Using the recent Urban Tree Canopy assessment
as a benchmark estimate, Edmonds' urban forest
produces about $1,567,000 in environmental
benefits and is maintained with a 2017 budget of
approximately $319,542.
Service Levels
To assess current urban forest workload and staffing
levels, an estimated 11 city staff members were
identified as persons who work with tree issues on
at least an intermittent basis every week. From those
who are involved with forestry issues or operations
on a more regular time basis, 3 individuals were
identified with a quantifiable amount of time each
week working with trees or tree -related issues.
Table 6: 2017 City Urban Forestry Expenditures
tone"M11MERTIM
Tree Planting and Initial Care $4,848
Tree Maintenance $79,779
Tree Removals $37,565
Management $62,771
Volunteer Activities $134,579
TOTAL $319,542
Budget Per Capita $7.74
UTC Estimate of Benefits $1,567,000
Overall, there is evidence of good interdepartmental
cooperation. These general conclusions about the
shared responsibilities among staff resources at the
City are very important when the City evaluates
future staffing needs for urban forestry. Currently,
no one single position is designated as a Full -Time
Employee (FTE) dedicated to urban forestry.
Table 7: Current Urban Forest Workload and
Staffing Levels
City Services
UrbanCommon
Related Activities
Hours per
Development plan review for
Permit Intake
compliance with tree
and Review
protection codes
2
Public inquiries (online,
phone, and counter)
Code
Investigating and resolving
Enforcement &
tree complaints
Complaint
Investigating and resolving
2
infrastructure damage
Investigation
complaints
Tree planting and
Parks & Public
establishment
Tree
Structural pruning on smaller
40-60
Maintenance
trees
Inspection and identification
of hazardous trees
Contract
Managing contract tree crews
1
Management
Emergency
Community Service Requests
0
Response
Response Management
Urban Forest Management
Comprehensive
Plan stewardship
(Long-range)
Federal, state grant
<1
Planning
procurement
Tree City USA applications
Volunteer events
Community
Coordinated tree planting
Education Action
Neighborhood association
1
and Outreach
support
Website content and public
education
Tree Board
Addressing public issues
1
Meetings
related to trees
Y
Q
What Do We Have? 32
Packet Pg. 225
8.1.a
Staff Training
The science of arboriculture, and the management
of urban forests are domains that are increasingly
recognized as special areas of expertise. Credentials
are increasingly requested by many municipalities
as evidence of competency. Bachelor's degrees in
Forestry, Urban Forestry, Environmental Sciences,
and Horticulture are often the base requirements
for leadership roles in urban forest management.
Professional credentials can also demonstrate
competency, with the most widely accepted
credentials in Washington State coming from the
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA).
Image of a tree with a co -dominant branch defect (middle
stem). The city has access to trained staff qualified to provide
expertise for identification of these tree safety risks.
The City provides on -going training to any staff
handling tree maintenance equipment, including
chainsaw, chipper, and lift -truck safety. Stakeholder
interviews revealed that landscape maintenance
workers in Edmonds receive no formal training on
structural pruning or tree care. The following is a
summary description of staff resources and training
within individual City departments:
• In Development Services, staff are trained to
interpret ordinances related to trees, but rely on
reports by ISA certified arborists when necessary
to render decisions. Staff within development
services have backgrounds in Urban Planning
and one (1) person with has an advanced degree
in Forestry. There are no ISA certified arborists
within development services staff.
• The Department of Public Works and Utilities
has a director with advanced degrees in
Biology and Aquatic Biology. In addition, the
department has engineers on staff who can
successfully consider relevant tree issues in
terms of asset and infrastructure management,
but tree care expertise is not required for any
staff in this department. Tree related issues are
resolved based on previous experiences and
through hired consultations with ISA certified
arborists when necessary.
• The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Department has two staff members who
provide expertise on urban forestry topics.
The first is an ISA certified arborist who is
referenced by all City departments and citizen
groups for opinions on the best practices
associated with tree care. There is also a staff
member who has an advanced degree in Forest
Ecology who works with citizen groups on tree
planting and stewardship projects.
Tree Acquisition and Quality
Control
The City's approach to acquiring trees is not guided
by any formal standard practices that ensure the
quality of trees during acquisition. As trees are
planted, there is no planned follow-up or warranties
managed with new trees.
33 what Do we Have?
Packet Pg. 226
8.1.a
Tree City USA
The Arbor Day Foundation is a 501c3 nonprofit
conservation and education organization founded in
1972 in Nebraska, United States, by John Rosenow.
It is the largest nonprofit membership organization
dedicated to tree planting. The Foundation offers
Tree City USA certification. Cities can earn Tree City
USA certification by meeting four (4) core standards
of quality urban forestry management: maintaining
a tree board or department, having a community
tree ordinance, spending at least $2 per capita on
urban forestry, and celebrating Arbor Day.
Currently, the City of Edmonds dedicates $319,542.20
towards total community forestry expenditure, and
with a population of roughly 41,260, has a per capita
investment of $7.74. The Arbor Day Foundation has
recognized this per capita investment, as well as
recognizing the City of Edmonds' community tree
ordinance and observance of Arbor Day.
Native Trees
Trees native to the Pacific Northwest are well -suited
to our climate. They also tend to provide good habit
for local wildlife. Many native trees, both coniferous
and broadleaved, are part of the City's urban forest.
They are currently encouraged in public and private
plantings but not necessarily required, except in
designated critical areas for wildlife habitat and/or
wetlands. More information about native trees and
their value is likely to be part of an upcoming round
of community education in Edmonds.
Cone from a douglas fir. (Photo by Peter Stevens CC BY)
An example of some native trees for the Pacific
Northwest include the following,:
Broadleaved Trees
• Big -Leaf Maple
• Black Cottonwood
• Oregon Ash
• Pacific Willow
• Red Alder
• Vine Maple
Conifers
• Douglas Fir
• Grand Fir
• Noble Fir
• Shore Pine
• Sitka Spruce
• Western Hemlock
• Western Larch
• Western Red Cedar
• Western White Pine
1 A more comprehensive list can be found in Appendix F
Leaves of a big leaf maple.
What Do We Have? 34
Packet Pg. 227
8.1.a
Major and Emerging Diseases
and Pests
Another important aspect to tree maintenance is
staying alert to managing emerging diseases and
pests that can be costly to control with individual
trees. For sustainability of the entire urban forest,
addressing both potential and actual problems
is critical. Further information on the pests and
diseases that threaten the forest ecosystems in
Washington can be found at:
• USDA's Forest Service website
• Pacific Northwest Pest Management Handbook
• Collier Arbor Care website —Top 20 Tree and
Shrub Problems in the PNW
• Washington State Department of Natural
Resources, Forest Health
Among the many diseases and pests that affect
trees, City Staff and residents should remain alert to
the following:
Diseases
• Laminated Root Rot (LRR) is the most important
disease affecting Douglas -fir caused by the fungal
pathogen Coniferiporia sulphurascens. In young
stands regenerated following harvesting, dead
or missing trees will be associated with large
stumps. These decayed trees will serve as an
inoculum source for neighboring trees to become
infected, as their roots grow in contact with
infected stumps/roots. Fungal growth invades the
heartwood and sapwood, resulting in reduced
uptake of water and nutrients, with weakened
support of the upper portion of the tree. Infected
trees are susceptible to windthrow, and there
may be trees in a group in various stages of decay
and dying. Live trees with LRR display symptoms
of shortened terminal growth, sparse foliage,
smaller needles, chlorosis (yellowing) and stress
cone crops. Trees can fall over before developing
obvious symptoms, or die standing. The disease is
very difficult to manage in an urban setting
(USFS, 2017).
• Armillaria Root Rot (ARR) affects the roots of
numerous tree species, notably Douglas -fir and
other Firs and Pines, as well as many hardwood
species. Armillaria ostoyae is the primary
fungal pathogen in the Pacific Northwest,
although A. mellea can also be involved in tree
decline and mortality. ARR disease is usually
associated with stress conditions, particularly
drought. The fungus survives for many years
in infected stumps, roots and organic matter
in the soil. Honey -colored mushrooms are
typically produced at the base of infected trees
in the fall. Typical symptoms include chlorotic
foliage, distress cone crops, significant resin
flow, decline and death. The fungus typically
produces black shoestring -like structures called
rhizomorphs on the bark at the base of the tree
or in the soil (OSU, 2018).
• Verticillium Wilt (VW) is a serious disease of
many tree hosts, but is especially problematic
on Maple species. Verticillium dahliae is a
soil -borne fungus that persists in the soil for
decades. The fungus infects roots and grows
into the xylem where it colonizes the vascular
elements. Its presence (mycelia and spores)
plus defense compounds produced by the
host clogs the xylem elements, preventing the
flow of water and nutrients in the tree. Wilting
results, and is exacerbated during periods of
drought. Leaves on one side of the tree affected
by VW or on one branch suddenly wilt and die.
Subsequently, other branches will wilt as the
disease progresses. Excised branches will have
vascular discoloration which is diagnostic of the
disease. Infected trees may survive for years
or die within weeks. Once infected, a tree will
not likely recover and will require removal. Tree
injections of fungicides are not usually effective
(OSU, 2018).
• Swiss Needle Cast (SNC) is the name of the
foliage disease of Douglas -fir caused by the
fungal pathogen Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii.
SNC is known as a "cast" disease because it
causes the premature shedding of needles (or
casting) from the tree, resulting in sparse tree
crowns and reduced growth. Although it is
35 what Do we Have?
Packet Pg. 228
8.1.a
called "Swiss" needle cast, the fungus is native
to the Western United States throughout the
range of Douglas -fir. SNC disease symptoms
include chlorotic needles and decreased
needle retention, resulting in sparse crowns
and reduced diameter and height growth (OSU,
2017). Mortality from the disease is considered
rare, but tree care and maintenance of this
disease can be expensive and necessary in an
urban setting.
• Leaf Blight (LB) is a serious disease affecting
Pacific Madrone caused by the fungal pathogen
Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis. At least a
dozen fungi can cause leaf spots and dead areas
on leaves; this is probably the most significant
cause of damage to the host. Older, lower
leaves are infected by spores disseminated by
wind or rain during wet weather in the fall.
Trees located in creek bottoms, valleys and the
forest understory are most susceptible to LB. If
wet weather persists, infection may be severe
and result in significant defoliation. Under these
conditions, the fungus can also infect green
shoots. Pruning dead branches to provide better
air circulation and raking and destroying fallen
leaves will help to reduce fungal inoculum and
subsequent infection (OSU, 2008).
• Anthracnose (A) affects a wide variety of shade
trees, especially Maple, Oak and Sycamore. The
closely related fungi Discula (Maple, Sycamore)
and Apiognomonia (Oak) are the causal agents
of the disease. The disease is favored by warm,
wet springs and several rounds of infection can
occur, each defoliating the tree, resulting in a
tree much more prone to subsequent drought
stress. Lesions on the leaves are typically
associated and limited by the veins, resulting
in discrete necrotic areas. In particularly
susceptible trees under ideal environmental
conditions, twig cankers can also develop. It is
important to rake up and destroy fallen leaves,
prune out twig cankers and water trees during
dry periods (OSU, 2018).
• Sudden Oak Death was discovered in
California in the mid 1990's, has spread
into southern Oregon (2001) and was found
(and has subsequently been contained or
eliminated) in a small area in Kitsap County
two years ago. The causal fungus Phytophthora
ramorum primarily infects species of Oaks, but
can also infect a wide range of other hosts,
including Camellia, Rhododendron, Blueberry
and other landscape plants. The fungus is
waterborne and can be spread in streams or
other forms of moving water. Symptoms on
Oaks include bleeding cankers on the trunk,
dieback of the foliage and mortality. Symptoms
on other plants can vary from leafspots to leaf
blight to twig dieback, but do not usually result
in death of the host. Quarantines are in place
to prevent further spread of SOD, largely from
nurseries (COMTF, 2019).
Insects
• Asian Long -Horned Beetle (ALB), is an invasive
insect that feeds on a wide variety of trees
in the United States, eventually killing them.
The beetle is native to China and the Korean
Peninsula. Signs of ALB start to show about
three to four (3-4) years after infestation, with
tree death occurring in ten to fifteen (10-15)
years depending on the tree's overall health and
site conditions. Infested trees do not recover,
nor do they regenerate. There are a broad
number of tree species this insect will feed in
and most common deciduous trees in Edmonds
are at risk.
• Tent Caterpillar (TC) is a serious defoliator of
broadleaf trees and shrubs in most areas of
the western U.S. Tree hosts include Red Alder,
Cottonwood, Willow, Ash, Pacific Madrone, and
many fruit trees. White silky tents appear soon
after bud break. As the larvae grow in size, the
tents also increase in size. Individual branches
near these tents are totally defoliated. Entire trees
may be defoliated by TC. After feeding has been
concluded, the larvae will turn into moths within
a cocoon. Eggs are laid on the twigs and branches
where they overwinter in protected masses.
Individual tents can be physically removed,
preferably in the early morning hours when the
larvae are contained in the tent (USFS, 2008).
c
a
c
as
c
0
U_
c
E
L
0
r
M
co
I
0
I
Cn
0
N
a
U_
D
a
U)
c
0
E
w
r
r
Q
c
a�
E
a
What Do we Have? 36
Packet Pg. 229
8.1.a
• Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid (CSGA) is a serious
pest of Spruce and Douglas -fir trees. It swarms
in the spring when the new needles emerge.
Crawler nymphs form galls at the branch tips.
These galls are initially green, becoming red and
eventually dry out. These affected branches cease
their growth, and if enough branches are affected,
the tree may be killed. White cottony specks will
also cover the entire branch. Trees with fewer galls
may be unsightly and foliage can be discolored
and distorted. Most outbreaks of CSGA do not
warrant control measures (NRC, 2015).
• Pine Bark Adelgid (PBA) feeds on the bark of pines
and spruce. They form cottony or wooly masses
on the twigs, branches or trunk. Heavy infestations
will turn the entire area white. Small trees will be
severely affected, resulting in chlorotic needles and
stunting or premature death. Small egg clusters are
laid in the early spring by the adults. Crawlers move
to other areas of the tree or to other trees nearby.
PBA can be removed by hand, preferably done when
the infestation has just begun (OSU, 2018).
• Bronze Birch Borer (BBB) is an emerging pest in
western Washington that has migrated from eastern
Washington in recent years. Periods of extended
summer drought have weakened birch trees and
made them more susceptible to this pest which can
severely damage or kill the trees. Chlorotic leaves and
sparse upper branches are the first symptoms that
homeowners usually notice from BBB attack. Close
examination will reveal lumpy bark and half -moon -
shaped beetle exit holes (WSU, 2008).
Symptoms of BBB Include Dying Top
37 what Do we Have?
• Douglas -fir Tussock Moth (DFTM) is a moth
found in Western North America. Its population
periodically erupts in cyclical outbreaks
(Wickman et al., 1998). Outbreaks of the
Douglas -fir tussock moth appear to develop
almost explosively, and then usually subside
abruptly after a year or two. The caterpillars
feed on the needles of Douglas fir, true fir,
and spruce in summer. Forestry management
to prevent tree damage from tussock moth
outbreaks include four activities: early detection,
evaluation, suppression, and prevention. These
four activities must be well integrated to ensure
adequate protection from the pest.
• Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) has killed hundreds of
millions of ash trees in North America. The EAB is
a destructive, non-native, wood -boring pest that
exclusively kills both stressed and healthy ash trees
2-3 years after infestation (NASPF, 2005). EAB is
a jewel beetle native to Northwestern Asia. EAB
larvae feed on the vascular tissue of trees and
populations grow exponentially. This pest has been
identified as moving slowly into the Western U.S.
and is considered a catastrophic pest for ash tree
populations.
• Other Diseases and Pests. Information on specific
diseases and insects that damage trees in our
region have been identified by the Washington
State Department of Natural Resources. Current
online information is at: www.dnr.wa.gov/
ForestHealth.
A. Asian Long -Horned Beetle B. Bronze Birch Borer
C. Douglas fir Tussock Moth D. Emerald Ash Borer
a
Packet Pg. 230
8.1.a
Regulatory
Framework
The City of Edmonds provides regulations for several
components relevant to urban forestry in the
Edmonds City Code and Community Development
Code. These regulations are designed to:
• Authorize the power of government to manage
the urban forest
• Define street trees and, as appropriate,
municipal responsibilities for their care
• Enumerate tree related fees and penalties
• Create regulations associated with tree clearing
on private land
• Require tree protection during construction
• Classify critical areas or buffers
These different regulations cover tree related
topics on a range of land types, and all influence
the direction and management of urban forestry
programs. The following summaries outline the
chapters and sections of city code.
Authorization of Power
The legitimacy of Edmonds' city government to
manage forestry domains and the definition of those
domains fall under the authorization of power:
• Chapter 18.45 provides for the City's Planning
Division Manager to direct and enforce City
codes related to land clearing and tree cutting
on public land and private property. It exempts
Public Works, Parks and Fire Departments in
specific situations where safety is an issue.
• Chapter 18.85.030 provides for the Director
of Public Works to enforce and inspect work
done to maintain City street trees in healthy
condition, or remove trees from the public
right-of-way as necessary.
• Chapter 10.95.030 provides for a Tree Board,
made up of Edmonds City residents in order
to encourage civic engagement for active
stewardship of the urban forest. The powers
and duties of the Tree Board are to advise and
make recommendations to the Mayor and City
Council as appropriate on tree related matters.
Street and Public Trees
The City of Edmonds is ultimately responsible
for the planting and maintenance of public trees.
These trees are on public property parcels or select
locations in the rights -of -way. Other planting strips
a -
are the responsibility of adjacent land owners:
E
• Chapter 9.20.060, for sidewalk construction
and maintenance, declares that the
responsibility is with the abutting property
owner for maintaining or repairing adjacent
i
planting strips. This includes all tree care.
�°
• Chapter 18.85 provides further clarity on the
c
regulation of street trees and trees on public
property. All street trees are managed by the
2
Public Works Department and require permits
for all persons who wish to plant, remove,
v
prune or otherwise change a tree on a street,
right-of-way, parking strip, planting strip, or
ci
other public place. This code chapter also
0
includes language defining abuse and damage
a
to street trees.
D
Tree Related Fees and Penalties
To facilitate compliance and remediation for
U)
o
disregarding public tree codes, the City provides
E
penalties as a punitive deterrent:
W
r
• Chapter 18.45.070 defines the punitive
Q
discretion for trees that are damaged from
disregard of City code of up to $1,000 for trees
less than 3" and $3,000 for trees larger than 3".
Fines can be tripled related to trees in critical
a
areas, buffers, or areas dedicated to public use,
including public right-of-way.
What Do We Have? 38
Packet Pg. 231
8.1.a
Private Land Clearing
Land clearing on private property is often a critical
challenge to effectively reaching urban forestry canopy
goals. Individual private property rights and objectives
of private landowners can frequently be at odds with
the community aspirations for the urban forest.
• Chapter 18.45 contains regulations associated
with trees on private properties for land
clearing and tree cutting. This code provides for
a variety of purposes that would preserve the
physical and aesthetic character of the City and
prevent indiscriminate removal or destruction
of trees. This chapter also implements policies
of the State Environmental Policy Act. It
provides special exemptions in 18.45.030 for
improved single-family lots, partially improved
single-family lots or certain unimproved lots,
allowing private property owners in these
categories to maintain or remove trees at their
discretion without permits. Additionally, these
land clearing codes provide exemptions for
utility vegetation maintenance or tree work
by City departments when situations involving
danger to life or property are found.
Tree Protection During
Construction
As new construction occurs throughout the Pacific
Northwest, many projects can damage or kill trees.
Regulations to protect trees during construction are a
mechanism to control canopy loss as sites are developed.
• Chapter 18.45 requires that trees that are
being retained during a land development
project are also protected. The codes describe
the protected area on a site as being within
the drip -line of the tree and attempts to limit
damage to trees by controlling the impact to
trees within this area.
Critical Areas and Buffers
Washington State has special laws to protect critical
areas, which are defined for certain types of valuable
and environmentally significant areas.
Chapter 23.40 establishes extra protections and
management requirements for trees located
near wetlands, streams, or steep slopes. Tree
pruning or removal is restricted or prohibited
without a report from an ISA certified arborist,
ASCA registered consultant, or a registered
landscape architect that documents the
hazard and provides a replanting schedule for
replacement trees.
Challenges
One of the more frequent complaints related to tree
removal in the city is when properties are developed
or subdivided. While a goal of the City's code is
that "trees should be retained to the maximum
extent feasible," other applicable development
regulations help determine what is feasible. There
are regulations that prescribe how wide driveways
and roads must be, how far the development must
be from the edges of a property, location of utilities
(water, sewer, gas, and power) that must be installed
underground, and stormwater requirements that
require the installation of stormwater facilities. As a
result, when one of the larger properties in the City
that contains a grove of trees is developed to meet
the many regulations and needs, sometimes only a
few trees are located outside of the development
footprint. Trees that were once stable in their
grove, are susceptible to wind throw and become
hazardous when isolated on their own. Where a
tree was once the right tree in the right location (one
tree protected in a larger grove), it may no longer be
the right tree in the right location (an exposed tree
on the perimeter of a lot) following development.
As the City considers updates to the development
code, updates should provide more ways to
encourage greater tree retention when properties
are developed. An example may be to provide
options for reduced interior setbacks that would
allow houses to be clustered and thus provide
an opportunity to avoid trees where otherwise
development would be placed under the regulations
in effect as of early 2019. Another example of an
update to consider may include evaluating the
required width of access easements.
39 what Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 232
Table 8: Summary of Current City of Edmonds Tree Cutting Regulations
8.1.a
0
a
U
7
a
Developed single-family
property, no critical areas
present
Developed single-family
property, critical areas
present
Removal of hazard trees in
critical area
Prune or trim trees
Multi -family property
and Planned Residential
Developments with
approved landscape plan
Commercial Property
Tree removal with
development
Trees in right-of-way
Street trees
No review, no permit
required
Yes, review and permit
required if tree in critical
area or critical area buffer
Review required, but no
permit
No review, no permit
Yes, review and permit
required
Yes, review and permit
required
Yes, review included with
land use or development
permit.
Yes, review and permit
required
Yes, review and permit
required
Prune or removal of park I No permit
trees
No notification required, but suggested
to avoid unnecessary Code Enforcement
Response
Tree cutting permit Type II decision (staff
decision with notice)
Documentation of hazard tree
by certified arborist, or clear
documentation of dead tree. Replanting
required at 2:1 ratio
Topping considered same as tree
cutting or removal unless retopping of a
previously approved topping
Design review against landscaping
requirements. Type I decision (staff
decision, no notice)
Design review against landscaping
requirements. Type I decision (staff
decision no notice)
Tree protection measures required for
trees to remain
A right-of-way construction permit is
required for any party other than the
City of Edmonds to perform any removal
or trimming of trees located within the
City rights -of -way
Design review against landscaping
requirements. Type I decision (staff
decision, no notice)
The City's Parks Department maintains
trees within the City's parks. While no
permit is required, tree removal and
replacement must be consistent with
the Citv's critical area regulations
What Do We Have? 40
Packet Pg. 233
8.1.a
Regional Urban
Forestry Resources
Regional urban forestry resources are organizations
that provide services to aid in the protection,
maintenance, and development of the urban forest.
These range from active volunteer groups in the
City, to nonprofits, academic institutions, and state
and federal government agencies. Some of the
organizations and programs described below have
been used by the City. Others may be good choices
for the future.
Edmonds' community volunteers helping to remove ivy and
improve forest health.
WFOM
WASHINGTON
COMMUNITY
��
Washington State Urban and
Community Forestry Program
Under the Washington State Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), the Washington State Urban
and Community Forestry (UCF) Program provides
technical, educational, and financial assistance
to Washington's cities and towns, counties,
tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, and
educational institutions. The mission of the UCF is:
"To provide leadership to create self-sustaining
urban and community forestry programs that
preserve, plant and manage forests and trees for
public benefits and quality of life."
A key service provided by the UCF is its collection of
financial assistance programs including; Community
Forestry Assistance Grants, Tree City USA Tree
Planting & Maintenance Grants, Arbor Day Tree
Reimbursements, Landscape Scale Restoration
Grants, Scholarships, and Internships. All forms of
financial assistance, their availability in a given year,
and their associated dollar amounts are dependent
on continued funding through annual grant
allocations from the USDA Forest Service. The UCF
communicates events, educational opportunities,
and other information through a Tree Link Newsletter.
The Washington Community Forestry Council
advises the DNR on policies and programs. The
program does this by teaching citizens and decision -
makers about the economic, environmental,
psychological, and aesthetic benefits of trees.
The program also helps local governments, citizen
groups, and volunteers plant and sustain healthy
trees throughout Washington. The council was
established under RCW 76.15.
41 what Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 234
8.1.a
i
FORT&RRA
FOR THE PEOPLE. FOR THE LEWD. FOREVER.
FORTERRA Green City
Partnerships
The Green City program helps urban communities
in the Puget Sound region effectively steward
their natural open spaces through best practices.
FORTERRA partners with local municipalities to
develop achievable goals, shared visions, long-term
plans, and community -based stewardship programs
to care for the valuable forests and natural areas in
our urban environments. Specific services include:
• City-wide forested park and natural area
assessment
• Strategic and restoration planning
• Volunteer program development and guidance
• Education and training for volunteers
• Restoration tracking systems
• Green City outreach and community
engagement
• On- the -ground stewardship projects and
event support
The Green City Partnerships share three (3) core goals:
• Improve the quality of life, connections to
nature, and enhance forest benefits in cities by
restoring our forested parks and natural areas
• Galvanize an informed and active community
• Ensure long-term sustainable funding and
community support
These unique public/private partnerships bring
together public, private, and nonprofit stakeholders
to create a sustainable network of healthy forested
parks and natural areas throughout the region.
Municipal Research and
Services Center
The Municipal Research and Services Center
(MRSC) is a nonprofit organization that helps local
governments across Washington State better serve
their citizens by providing legal and policy guidance
on any topic. The MRSC collects state and local
information from parks and recreation departments,
land use planners, utilities, and citizen organizations
to promote and manage urban forestry resources.
Example resources include local urban forestry
programs in Washington State, legal references, and
related articles.
a
A deodar cedar provides shade for parked cars.
What Do We Have? 42
Packet Pg. 235
8.1.a
future
wise �
Futurewise
Futurewise is a nonprofit that has worked to prevent
sprawl to protect the resources of communities
in Washington State. Futurewise was founded
to help support implementation of Washington
State's Growth Management Act, and to focus on
preventing the conversion of wildlife habitat, open
space, farmland, and working forests to subdivisions
and development.
Futurewise provides data analysis and research,
community and environmental planning and
policy development, community engagement and
outreach, grassroots organizing and advocacy,
legislative initiatives, and litigation. These services
are all provided through strategic collaboration with
businesses, governments, community organizations,
and nonprofit partners.
Wetland stream flowing through Edmonds.
w
COLLEGE
of the
ENVIRONMENT
The University of Washington
Restoration Ecology Network
TThe UW-Restoration Ecology Network (UW-REN)
is a tri-campus program, serving as a regional
center to integrate student, faculty and community
interests in ecological restoration and conservation.
Students in the program are required to complete
capstone projects, where students of different
academic backgrounds work together to complete
a local restoration project. Students learn how
to plan, design, install, and monitor a restoration
project while working in teams. The Capstone
spans three academic quarters beginning in the
fall. Communities collaborate with the program to
develop RFPs, which then provide volunteers for the
community and excellent learning experiences for
the students.
%AF
.:
43 what Do we Have?
Packet Pg. 236
8.1.a
EarthCorps
EarthCorps is a human capital development
program where corps members learn leadership
skills by working collaboratively, leading community
volunteers, and executing technical restoration
projects along shorelines, trails, and in forests. Puget
Sound Stewards help EarthCorps run restoration
events, monitor plant growth, adapt management
plans, and educate the community. EarthCorps
collaborates with businesses, nonprofits, and
communities to offer volunteers who are passionate
about conservation and restoration.
The Puget Sound Stewards program in Edmonds was
created by EarthCorps in 2015 in partnership with
the City of Edmonds with support from the Hazel
Miller Foundation. The goal was to provide on-
Forested park canopy in Edmonds.
Forested park canopy in Edmonds.
going, locally -based, expert care for one of the City's
key natural areas. Starting with Edmonds Marsh, a
wildlife sanctuary and rare example of a saltwater
marsh in the midst of a city, the program has grown
to include three more sites: Brackett's Landing,
Willow Creek Demonstration Garden, and Hutt Park.
The volunteers who join the Puget Sound Steward
program are supported by EarthCorps staff and crews
as they learn about the ecology of Puget Sound and
how to perform actions that improve the ecological
health of project sites in Edmonds that contribute to
the health of Puget Sound and Edmonds residents.
Actions include removing invasive weeds such as
Himalayan Blackberry or English Ivy, mulching areas
in need of water retention and weed suppression,
and replanting with native plants to foster greater
biodiversity.
a+
Q
What Do We Have? 44
Packet Pg. 237
8.1.a
Urban Forestry
Practices:
Case Studies
In order to remain progressive with its urban forestry
programs, the City of Edmonds recognizes that
there are urban forestry practices emerging from
other municipalities that could eventually add value
if developed within the City. Through stakeholder
interviews and discussions with City Staff, three
urban forestry practices were selected as important
for further consideration in implementation of this
UFMP: Tree Banks (orfee in -Lieu programs), Heritage
Tree Programs and Arborist Business Licensing. This
section explores some examples around how other
cities have adopted these programs.
Tree Banks - Fee -based
alternatives to tree replacement
Often in the course of urban forest management,
there can be logistical challenges associated with
replacing trees at the same site where trees are
removed. An increasingly common solution is
to provide developers and residents with the
opportunity to pay fees in -lieu of meeting their
landscaping requirements. Providing a fee orfinancial
guarantee option creates a system for funding
tree planting projects or even more sophisticated
landscape restoration projects that improve the
overall health and condition of the urban forest.
Precedence for this option can be found at the
National level, with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
In a Federal Rule published in April 2008, The U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) define an in -
lieu fee program as:
• "A program involving the restoration,
establishment, enhancement, and/or
preservation of aquatic resources through
funds paid to a governmental or non-profit
natural resources management entity to satisfy
compensatory mitigation requirements... Similar
to a mitigation bank, an in -lieu fee program sells
compensatory mitigation credits to permittees
whose obligation to provide compensatory
mitigation is then transferred to the in -lieu
program sponsor."
Snohomish County
Here, the government provides options for
permit applicants to engage the county, their own
contractor, or do the mitigation work themselves to
ensure that mitigation is achieved, even when it is
not possible at the proposed project site:
• 'Applicants may choose to perform the off -
site mitigation work on private property either
themselves or through their own contractor,
subject to all other provisions of Section 30.62
SCC, or applicants may enter into a voluntary
mitigation agreement with the County pursuant
to RCW 82.02.020 under which the County
will perform the mitigation work on public
property within the same sub -drainage basin
or watershed resource inventory area (WRIA)."
(POL-6210 REQUIREMENTS FOR PROVIDING
OFF -SITE MITIGATION FOR IMPACTS TO
CRITICAL AREAS ARISING OUT OF SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION UNDER
SCC 30.62.330)
The following cities are examples of fee in -lieu
programs related to urban forestry. There is some
variation in how these fees are calculated, as well as
where the funds collected get administered.
City of Redmond
The City of Redmond calculates fee in -lieu to include
the cost of the trees. More importantly, the fee also
includes all costs associated with establishment
care. From Article IV Environmental Regulations:
• RMC 21.72.080 E.2. - Tree Replacement Fee A
fee in- lieu of tree replacement may be allowed,
subject to approval by the Administrator after
careful consideration of all other options. A
tree replacement fee shall be required for each
replacement tree required but not planted on
the application site or an offsite location.
i. The amount of the fee shall be the tree base
fee times the number of trees necessary to
satisfy the tree replacement requirements
45 What Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 238
8.1.a
of this section. The tree base fee shall cover
the cost of a tree, installation (labor and
equipment), maintenance for two years,
and fund administration.
The fee shall be paid to the City prior to the
issuance of a tree removal Permit.
Fees collected under this subsection shall be
expended only for the planting of new trees
in City -owned parks, open spaces or rights -
of -way.
• http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/redmond-
wa/export2doc.aspx?pdf=1&tocid=005.009&fil
e=doc-005.009-pid-80.pdf
City of Renton
The City of Renton has much more limited code
language. Fee in -lieu options are still at the City's
Community volunteers pulling weeds and improving forest
health in Edmonds.
discretion, but only cover the cost of the tree and
installation. No funding for establishment care
is required in this code. However, the code does
directly designate the funds to be allocated to the
Urban Forestry Program fund, which provides more
discretion to the City with how the funds get allocated:
• RMC 4-4-130 H.1.E iii. Fee in Lieu: When the
Administrator determines that it is infeasible
to replace trees on the site, payment into
the City's Urban Forestry Program fund
may be approved in an amount of money
approximating the current market value of
the replacement trees and the labor to install
them. The City shall determine the value of
replacement trees. http://www.codepublishing
com/WA/Renton/#!/Renton04/RentonO4O4/
Renton0404130.html
What Do We Have? 46
Packet Pg. 239
City of Port Angeles
8.1.a
City of Seattle
The City of Port Angeles provides a fee in -lieu
option, but it only appears to relate to street tree
replacement requirements. Another distinction in
this code is the fee is determined by the Community
Forester (a city staff position):
• PAMC 11.13.050 B.3. Street tree requirements
in previously developed area. In addition to
the above requirements, the following also
apply: Where new street trees cannot be
planted due to portions of rights -of -way having
been previously paved or otherwise rendered
unsuitable to plant trees, a fee -in -lieu of planting
is required. Such fee shall be determined by
the Community Forester per City Policy and
deposited into the Community Forestry Fund.
https://library.municode.com/wa/port_angeles/
codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=TIT11STSl_
CH 11.13STTR_11.13.050STTREN RE
Heritage Tree Programs -
Recognizing Historical
Significance of Trees
In many cities around the nation, trees are often
recognized for their historical significance to the
community. This recognition is commonly referred to
as part of a Heritage Tree Program. These programs
provide communities with a way of officially
recognizing trees, and with the recognition, can offer
a variety of benefits to the community, including:
• Increasing public awareness of trees and the
urban forest
• Drawing attention to and protecting unique and
significant trees
• Reinforcing how trees are a key component of
a city's character and sense of place
• Engaging citizens with the purpose and
activities of a city's urban forestry program
• Encouraging public participation in the
identification and perpetuation of heritage
trees throughout the City
In the greater Puget Sound region, a number of cities
have heritage tree programs. One of the earliest
programs was for the City of Seattle in 1996 when
PlantAmnesty (a nonprofit) initiated a program that
eventually became co -sponsored by the City. Seattle's
program provides the broadest set of categories for
designating a tree as a heritage tree. Trees can be
designated according to the following categories:
• Specimen: A tree of exceptional size, form,
or rarity.
• Historic: A tree recognized by virtue of its age,
its association with or contribution to a historic
structure or district, or its association with a
noted person or historic event.
• Landmark: Trees that are landmarks of a
community.
• Collection: Trees in a notable grove, avenue,
or other planting.
City of Vancouver
The City of Vancouver, Washington, has had
a heritage tree program in place since 1998.
Unlike Seattle, which already regulates the care
of exceptional trees (including heritage trees) on
private property, the City of Vancouver uses this
designation to protect trees on private properties
where tree removal permits would not ordinarily
be required. This is a voluntary program for private
property owners, thus protecting the rights of the
property owner (https://www.cityofvancouver.us/
publicworks/page/heritage-trees).
City of Lynnwood
Closer to Edmonds, in the neighboring City of
Lynnwood, the Heritage Tree program is defined
in municipal code. Although many aspects of this
program are similarto other cities, their specific code
language binds all successive owners of the tree to
the protection obligations within this designation.
This language has the added benefit of ensuring
long-term protection and care for the tree unless it
is determined to be a hazard (LMC 17.5.070).
47 What Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 240
8.1.a
Arborist Business Licenses -
Ensuring Best Practices in
Tree Care
Businesses that operate in Edmonds only require
a general business license to work as an arborist.
This is not uncommon, but many cities are now
recognizing how the complexity of city codes
associated with tree care and the expectations
of the community necessitate special licensing
for businesses that perform tree work. Tree care
industry professionals and researchers in the
science of arboriculture routinely convene as the
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), or the
Tree Care Industry Association (TCIA). These groups
collaborate to encourage best practices in tree care
and tree worker safety. To help ensure a community
has companies that are adequately trained and
qualified for tree work, the use of arborist licensing
that ties the business with these organizations
is increasingly popular. The following cities were
selected from throughout the U.S. as examples of
different approaches for arborist business licensing:
City of Herrington
• Herrington, KY — Businesses that practice
arboriculture must submit an application to
the City for a Tree Contractor license. The
application identifies the business as practicing
arboriculture and requires proof of sufficient
insurance (http://www.cityofherington.com/
pview.aspx?id=32514&catl D=547).
Jim
Community engagement on urban forestry is important to
encourage tree retention on private properties.
City of Lincoln
• Lincoln, NE — In Lincoln, applications for tree
services and arborists not only require proof of
insurance, but also proof of ISA credentials or a
tree worker test administered by the parks and
recreation department. http://Iincoln.ne.gov/
city/parks/communityforestry/arborist.htm
City of Denver
• Denver, CO — Denver has two classes for their
"Tree Service License." This is a distinct feature
of their licensing process. Licenses can be
issued to businesses working on "Large Trees,"
which require workers to leave the ground,
or an "Ornamental" license, designed for
companies doing landscaping work on small
trees that do not require an aerial lift. https:H
www.denvergov.org/content/dam/denvergov/
Portals/747/documents/forestry/tree-license-
info-packet.pdf
City of Spokane
• Spokane, WA — Spokane has a commercial tree
license that businesses must secure if they are
doing work on public property trees (e.g.,street
trees and park trees). https://my.spokanecity.
org/urbanforestry/permits/
What Do We Have? 48
Packet Pg. 241
8.1.a
Incentives - Encouraging Tree
Retention on Private Properties
From the urban tree canopy assessment, it was
determined that the majority of tree canopy in
the city is privately owned and managed. For cities
to manage their urban forests, collaboration and
voluntary commitments on the part of private
property owners can be a beneficial strategy that
encourages desirable tree care and retention
practices. (Note: In some "incentive programs,"
cities have first established by code minimum tree
density requirements for private properties and
then used incentives to allow property owners some
flexibility in retaining the minimum tree density). The
following are example methods that cities, counties,
and states have used to incentivize desirable tree
stewardship on private property:
City of Portland
Portland, OR — The City of Portland has a
"Treebate" program which provides a one-time
credit on individual utility bills for planting
a tree in a residential yard. The amount of
credit depends on the size of the tree. (Certain
types of trees are excluded from the program.)
https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/
article/314187
Brevard County
• Brevard County, FL— In Brevard County,
incentives were created to encourage tree
preservation as they relate to landscaping
requirements during development. This code
language incentivizes by providing credits for
exceeding tree canopy density, preserving
native trees of significant size, or vegetation of
special concern. These credits reduce the tree
re -planting requirements otherwise associated
with development projects. (Code Sec 62-4344).
http://brevardcounty.elaws.us/code/coor_ptii_
appid32777_ch62_artxiii_div2_sec62-4344
City of Rocklin
• Rocklin, CA — In an effort to preserve its
native oak population, the City of Rocklin
established incentives in their code. Projects
that save 25% or more of the surveyed oak
trees receive expedited processing by the
Community Development department. In
addition, development projects can have traffic
mitigation and capital facility fees deferred from
3 months up to 12 months depending on the
trees being saved. http://www.rocklin.ca.us/
sites/main/files/file-attachments/oak_tree_
preservation_guidelines.pdf
State of Hawaii
State of Hawaii — In an effort to encourage the
care and maintenance of trees determined as
"exceptional", residents can deduct up to $3000
per tax year for their costs associated with
tree care. The code language has an additional
limitation that this tax deduction can only be
allowed once every three years. (HRS 235-19).
http://files.hawaii.gov/tax/legal/hrs/hrs_235.pdf
When the City of Edmonds updates its development
regulations, incentives for tree retention and tree
planting should be considered. These may include:
Tree bank
Tree bank funded by development. Developer
pays X dollar for each significant tree removed
during development into a tree bank. This
"incentivizes" tree retention because the
developer may find ways to maintain trees rather
than pay into the tree bank.
• Tree bank could be used to supply property
owners with certificates to purchase trees to
plant on their property.
Tree bank funds could be used towards
purchase of forested properties when they
become available.
49 What Do We Have?
Packet Pg. 242
8.1.a
Development flexibility to maintain trees
• Allowing reduced interior setbacks may allow
more flexibility in home placement and provide
opportunities for tree retention.
• Allow for deviations from access and road width
requirements to allow more flexibility in design
and home placements.
• Encourage low impact development techniques
which promote tree retention.
Heritage Tree Program
• Develop a voluntary Heritage Tree Program to
recognize unique or special trees as a way to
recognize stewardship of the urban forest by
local property owners.
Further consideration of the above —and any
additional —ideas should be explored in more detail
as part of the code update process in the near future.
Summary Considerations for
Urban Forest Practices
Historical practices and regulatory requirements
provide a clear vision and mandate that direct the
City to manage the entire urban forest. In particular,
the City has special authority over property it owns
or that is within the public right-of-way. Yet, no
comprehensive public tree inventory exists. The City
also does not have a dedicated forestry specialist to
direct the City's urban forest management activities.
Instead, the City has multiple departments that are
guided by codes and policies for site -specific decisions
without overarching strategic level guidance of the
forest. An example encountered by public works staff
is when a tree removal is being considered. One tree
may need to be removed and replaced for safety
reasons, but additional trees may get removed and
replaced to maintain the aesthetic of the streetscape.
Without overarching urban forest strategies, removals
of trees for simple rights -of -way improvements can be
seen as reactive solutions resolved through political
discourse instead of planned practical decisions for
city managers.
This reactive approach to urban forest management
also extends to the tree care budget. The City does
not maintain sufficient tree related information
(such as tree quantity or condition data) to budget
for proactive tree care. Current urban forestry
benefits models show how trees in Edmonds
provide environmental and economic benefits that
are much greater than their reactive management
costs. There is tremendous opportunity to leverage
this disparity and direct forest management toward
proactive tactics such as tree planting, young tree
maintenance pruning, and tree inspections.
With approximately 13%ofthe City's entire tree canopy
in public ownership, other methods to encourage or
require tree planting/protection will be needed for
the community to have influence over tree care in
the remaining 87% of the forest. Some strategies that
have been engaged in at other municipalities include
the fee in -lieu programs to support variances in any
tree replacement obligations, Heritage Tree Programs
that protect special trees, and arborist business
licensing to encourage best practices in tree care, and
incentive programs.
The City's policies with regard to the acquisition
of open space (including the potential purchase of
forested properties) are contained with the Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Land
acquisition is included in the capital project budget
and the PROS plan notes that "expansions of the
parks system will target the gaps identified in this
plan and take advantage of opportunities as they
emerge. Due to the constrained nature of Edmonds,
this approach will require vigilance and proactive
pursuit of potential land acquisition opportunities
for both parks and open spaces. The City's inclusion
of this item in the capital projects list recognizes
the importance of swift action when rare property
acquisition opportunities become available." A
specific policy addressing the purchase of forested
properties could be considered for adding to the
PROS plan to recognize the potential of maintaining
the City's tree cover through the selective purchase
of forest properties as opportunities arise.
Finally, the City of Edmonds has both public and
nonprofit agencies committed to helping Edmonds
maintain a healthy urban forest. With continued
and greater engagement, the City may realize more
grant -funded opportunities, volunteer resources,
and engaged citizens who will help the City achieve
its urban forest management goals.
a
What Do We Have? so
Packet Pg. 243
8.1.a
What Do We Want?
Stakeholder and
Community Input
Edmonds conducted substantial outreach to public
stakeholders, residents, and nonprofit agency
stakeholders. Connections and relationships that
develop among stakeholders are valuable outcomes
of the urban forest outreach process. This provided
a wide context for the challenges that face Edmonds'
urban forest. As community awareness and actions
associated with urban forestry move forward, it will
be the people of Edmonds that ultimately realize the
value of their contributions to their community in
the trees that grow around them.
Stakeholder Interviews
In the summer of 2017, a team from the Davey
Resource Group and Nature Insight Consulting
met with several municipal and regional urban
forest stakeholders. These stakeholder interviews
occurred over two days and included urban
planners, utility experts, public works staff, tree
board representatives, and City staff leadership.
Their valuable contributions guided the framework
of the UFMP.
Virtual Open House
Throughout the development process, the City
hosted a website that provided community access
to the planning process. In addition, the website
provided access to videos of public presentations,
surveys, and invitations for public comments. This
approach provided further opportunities for public
input outside of scheduled community meetings.
Community Meetings
The first public meeting was held with the City of
Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board on May 4, 2017.
During this meeting, issues, concerns, and values
about the urban forest were explored with members
and visitors in attendance.
Later, on June 22, 2017, the City of Edmonds hosted
the first of two open houses (Appendix D) at City Hall
to share information about the UFMP development
process and gather input from community
residents. The open house included a presentation
and a brief discussion with the audience to answer
clarifying questions. Following the presentation,
attendees were invited to provide input (thoughts,
ideas, concerns, questions) on six opinion poster
boards. Each poster board contained a broad
topic followed by initial suggestions generated
through the prior stakeholder interview process.
Attendees were invited to express their opinions
using dots (where green = a positive "vote"/
agreement for the suggestion, yellow = concern/
hesitation of the suggestion, and red = a negative
"vote"/disagreement or dislike of the suggestion).
Attendees were invited to use as many dots of
each color as necessary to express their opinion of
each suggestion on each poster board. In addition,
each poster board provided an area for Additional
Suggestions, where attendees were invited to write
down their thoughts, ideas, concerns, and questions
on a sticky note. The sticky note was then adhered
to the poster board for other attendees to review
and "vote" on.
A third meeting which was with the Planning Board,
occurred on July 26, 2017 as another opportunity
to solicit public participation early in the UFMP
development process. The results of these public
meetings helped the City to understand the needs
and concerns of the community and guide the
development of the online survey.
51 what Do we want?
Packet Pg. 244
— �AN "
M•�vr
.[Ira iihLu�[
I:
spa rd[x[I
1 Afff i��l
r
_
�
rSF
�.
Al
r
8.1.a
Online Community Survey
As part of the initial stakeholder outreach, a survey
was developed with the intention of understanding
and benchmarking Edmonds' community values and
views on the urban forest. It was not conducted as a
statistically valid study but as one to guage community
values and get public feedback. Survey data was
collected online. The survey platform only allowed
one survey response per household to control for
multiple entries from a single respondent. The survey
closed in September of 2017 with 175 responses
having been gathered through the summer (Appendix
C). Responses increased following the public open
house and a presentation to the planning board.
Although the intent was to gather feedback from a
broad representation of the community, 40.9% of the
respondents affiliated themselves with the Edmonds
Bowl area, with another 15.2% affiliating with the
Seaview neighborhood. Other neighborhoods had less
than fifteen (15) responses each, about 29.3% of the
combined total. 14.6% (24 responses) did not affiliate
within the survey -defined neighborhood groups.
The results showed how seventy-five percent
(74.9%) of respondents "strongly agree" that public
trees are important to the quality of life in Edmonds.
Sixty-seven percent (66.9%) of respondents "agree"
or "strongly agree" that Edmonds needs more public
40 %
35%
30%
25 %
20 %
15%
10%
Edmonds' fountain and traffic circle trees.
trees. The most popular location for more trees is
in open space and natural areas (60.4%), followed
by parks (59.2%), streetscapes (59.2%), then trails
and bike paths (45.6%), downtown (42.6%), and golf
courses (11.2%).
When asked to rank the environmental benefits
most valued from the urban forest, respondents
expressed the greatest appreciation for air quality
benefits, with 36.6% indicating that it is the most
important benefit, followed by wildlife habitat, and
water quality. Energy savings were ranked as least
important at 4.6% (Figure 4).
Figure 5: Most Valuable Environmental Benefit
0%
0/
Improved Air Quality
Wildlife Habitat
Protect Water Carbon Storage
Energy Savings Other
Quality/Reduced
Stormwater Runoff
Environmental Benefits
53 what Do We want?
Packet Pg. 246
8.1.a
View of street trees at 5th Avenue South and Main Street.
On average, respondents ranked the beauty of trees
as the most important intangible benefit, followed
by shaded trails, sidewalks, and bike trails, then
40
35
30
25
20
15%
10%
attractiveness to residents. The benefit of shaded
parking was ranked as the least important aesthetic
benefit (Figure 5).
Figure 6: Most Valuable Intangible Benefit
50
■
■
■
■ ■
0/o
Beauty/Aesthetics
Shaded
Attractive to
Shaded Improve retail Increased Property Passive recreation Shaded Parkin
Trails,sidewalks,
Residents
streets/Buffer areas and Values
and bike trails
from vehicles neighborhoods
Intangible Benefits
c
a
c
a)
E
a�
a�
CU
c
rn
a�
L
0
ILL
E
L
L
r
M
I
0
rn
I
0
N
a
w
D
Q
c
0
E
w
r
Q
r
c
a)
E
t
R
Q
What Do We Want?
Packet Pg. 247
8.1.a
In general, respondents are satisfied with the
current level of maintenance, with 69.8% saying they
"Agree" or "Strongly Agree." When asked to rank
various options for the level of maintenance that
public trees should receive, 52.1% of respondents
indicated their preferred expectation is for trees to
receive hazard maintenance (Figure 6).
Fifty-four percent (53.9%) of respondents would like
to seethe City help preserve trees on private property.
Education and outreach were considered the best
ways to encourage tree planting and preservation
on private property, with 79.0% of respondents
identifying these as their preferred methods.
Respondents were asked to select the types of
education and public outreach they would like to
see offered by the urban forestry program. The
most popular educational materials were website
resources (62.7%), followed by interpretive trails
and displays (59.8%), guided nature and tree walks
(55.0%), and informational brochures (43.2%).
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Take care of hazardous trees.
Street tree along Main Street.
Figure 7: Maintenance Expectations
Holistic Plant Health Care
(Improve the urban forest,
but not necessarily every
tree)
Best possible care (all trees Clearance only (keep the None -Keep them natural
should look good) sidewalks and streets clear)
Maintenance Expectations
55
What Do We Want?
Packet Pg. 248
8.1.a
Summary Considerations for
Public Outreach
Already considered a valuable asset by Edmonds
residents, Edmonds has an opportunity to further
improve the urban forest through increased
public outreach and community engagement.
Public engagement on urban forestry issues has
demonstrated that the public is generally satisfied
with the City's activities on public property, but
prefers to have the City only provide guidance and
education as opposed to regulation when it comes
to stewardship of trees on private property.
There is general agreement from survey respondents
that trees impact views for many residents, and the
issue galvanizes residents as a primary tree issue
in Edmonds. In fact, views of the water and other
scenic places are fundamental to Edmonds' identity
as a community. Scenic views are also considered
a property right of long-established development.
At the same time, appreciation of trees —especially
"the right trees in the right place" —is a value shared
by almost everyone.
Private property trees have canopy that can shade public streets.
Street trees along 5th Avenue.
c
a
c
as
E
aD
a�
c
0
LL
c
E
L
0
r
M
to
I
0
o�
I
0
N
(L
a
U)
0
E
w
r
a+
a+
Q
a-�
C
N
E
M
V
fC
a+
a+
Q
What Do We Want? 56
Packet Pg. 249
8.1.a
How Do We Get There?
Over the next twenty (20) years, the City of
Edmonds will be able to enhance management of
the urban forest through implementation of actions
recommended in this Plan. The decision to develop
a Plan with a 2038-time horizon was primarily based
on the precedence established by the City with
other long-range planning documents. Additionally,
growing and improving Edmonds' urban forest are
slow processes. Tree physiology for most trees in
Western Washington can take up to seven (7) years
to establish after planting, and anotherten (10) years
before they reach functional maturity. Trees provide
the majority of their ecosystem services when they
reach functional maturity. For this additional reason,
it is essential that urban forest planning consider at
least twenty (20) years within the Plan framework as
a reasonable expectation for achieving the desired
state of the urban forest.
The five (5) long-range strategic goals provided
in this Plan will guide actions and activities that
address the three components of a sustainable
urban forestry program:
• Urban Forest Asset Actions, which are intended
to improve the urban forest resource over the
next twenty (20) years by developing detailed
expectations for the urban forest. To accomplish
this, most activities will increase the amount of
information the City maintains about its urban
forest resource. This includes activities like
routine tree canopy assessments and a public
tree inventory, both of which are fundamental
to management and are substantial expenses to
an urban forestry program requiring significant
consideration.
• Municipal Resource Actions, which are
intended to drive improvements in City policy
and practices by developing efficiency and
alignment of efforts within City departments.
The common activities for accomplishing these
goals center around developing policies that
promote routine tree inspection and formalized
tree management strategies for City -owned
trees. The results will encourage the City to
improve its awareness and mitigation of tree
hazards and eliminate barriers to effective
urban forest management.
• Community Resource Actions, which are
intended to build stronger community
engagement and public participation in urban
forest stewardship. The activities coordinate
with the public and encourage the participation
of citizens and businesses to align with the
City's vision for the urban forest.
The research into current and historical efforts in
urban forestry at the City has revealed numerous
opportunities for Edmonds to enhance the
understanding of the urban forest resource as well as
improve efficiency in tree maintenance operations.
The criteria and indicators proposed by Kenney, et al.
(2011) were used as a standard to assess the current
urban forestry practices in the City, and provide
the management reference necessary to frame the
following recommended goals for this plan.
Each action contains time designations which
estimate the anticipated timeframe for completion
of the action/activity once it is started.
57 How Do We Get There?
Packet Pg. 250
8.1.a
Scenic views of the Puget Sound from Edmonds. Trees can
obstruct the view, but can also be the view.
r
r
Q
c
W
E
c�
Q
How Do We Get There? 58
Packet Pg. 251
Urban Forest Management Plan Goals
Goad 1 Time
Goal 1- Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage
The city has limited information about the condition of the urban forest. Success
with this objective will be achieved with enhanced management of public trees
and a deeper understanding of the population of trees on private property. The
following actions will support this objective:
A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development
On -going
impacts on the urban forest and to consider changes to tree replacement
requirements and penalties for code violations
B. Adopt policy goal of no net loss to overall tree canopy and continue to
1 Year
enhance canopy in parks according to the PROS plan.
C. Ensure protection of tree resources in environmentally critical areas
On -going
D. Develop a voluntary heritage tree program
3-5 Years
E. Enforce city regulations on tree cutting
On -going
i. Reach out periodically to tree maintenance and landscaping firms to
make sure they know Edmonds' requirements for pruning or removing
trees
F. Establish a tree bank or fund to which donations can be made for tree
3-5 Years
planting and other tree programs
i. Use any penalty fees from tree cutting violations to fund tree programs
G. Support sustainable ways to combat pests and disease that threaten trees
On -going
H. Consider need for dedicated City arborist
On -going
I. Report at least every 10 years on canopy coverage
10 Years, On -going
J. Periodically review and, if needed, update Urban Forest Management Plan
5-10 Years, On -going
(generally, every 5-10 years)
59 How Do We Get There?
Packet Pg. 252
Urban Forest Management Plan Goals
Goal 2 Time
Goal 2 - Manage public trees proactively
The city has identified opportunities within this plan to improve its risk
management associated with trees and create better pathways for community
engagement. The following actions will support this objective:
A. Use best available science in caring for the urban forest on City properties
On -going
and ROW
B. Have adequate resources (staff, contractual help, training, or other) to
On -going
monitor the health of public trees and make decisions on their care
C. Develop and maintain an inventory of trees in key public places (for example,
On -going
along certain City streets or trails) to document tree condition and risk
D. Update the Street Tree Plan periodically
5-10 Years, On -going
E. Support removal of invasive plants, such as ivy, where they threaten the
On -going
health of public trees
F. Coordinate among departments on tree issues and identify lead City staff
On -going
person to guide approach and activities
G. Develop and implement a tree planting plan on City property and ROW to
3-5 Years, On -going
help ensure:
i. Age and species diversity;
ii. And suitability of species to location
H. Implement a program of regular maintenance and pruning for City trees,
3-5 Years, On -going
consistent with best management practices
I. Lead or facilitate volunteer activities for tree planting/care on City property
1 Year, On -going
and rights -of way
J. As part of City -sponsored capital projects, provide funding for appropriate
On -going
trees in rights -of -way and on City properties
K. Provide an annual report to the City Council on tree planting/management
On -going
for City properties and right-of-way (ROW)
How Do We Get There? 60
Packet Pg. 253
Urban Forest Management Plan Goals
Goal 3 Time
Goal 3 - Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property
To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the city recognizes that
voluntary public participation must be encouraged. The following actions will
support this objective.
A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds 3-5 Years, On -going
B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore 3-5 Years, On -going
establishment of:
i. A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes;
and/or
ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or
iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of
tree planting and protection.
C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property 1 Year, On -going
owners that maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees
61 How Do We Get There?
Packet Pg. 254
Urban Forest Management Plan Goals
Goal 4 Time
Goal 4 - Provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree
planting and care
The city recognizes the importance of the privately managed tree population in
the city and recognizes the opportunity to support community stewardship. The
following actions will support this objective:
A. Provide signage or other information about significant public trees 1 Year
B. Provide for Tree Board, especially to: 1 Year, On -going
i. Develop community education materials;
ii. Participate in or initiate tree planting and tree care activities, including
outreach to citizen volunteers
iii. Report annually to the City Council on Tree Board activities
C. Develop and disseminate information for the public on the value of trees 1 Year, On -going
and to provide guidance on tree selection and management
How Do We Get There? 62
Packet Pg. 255
Urban Forest Management Plan Goals
Goad 5 Time
Goal 5 - Promote "Right tree, right place"
Ultimately, the urban forest will be sustainable when o balanced combination
of long-lived native trees and nursery grown street trees ore growing in suitable
spaces to maintain views, support wildlife (pollinators, birds, mammals, etc) and
provide optimum environmental services. The following actions will support this
objective:
A.
Make readily available lists of compatible trees for planting in various kinds
1 Year
of local settings
i. Indentify: large native tree species that can spread out in large spaces;
low -growing trees in view corridors, trees with appropriate root systems
near sidewalks and underground pipes.
ii. Provide lists of suitable trees to support pollinators and backyard wildlife
habitat.
B.
Identify key areas to increase canopy and:
1-3 Years
i. For any such private properties, encourage appropriate tree planting or
other techniques; and
ii. for any such public properties, consider and take action to appropriately
plant trees or otherwise increase canopy.
C.
Identify and plan for the care of unsuitable trees and, as necessary, for
On -going
pruning or removal when they are potentially damaging to people, buildings
or infrastructure
D.
Ensure that development regulations require native trees and vegetation
On -going
to be planted in critical areas, especially near streams and other wildlife
habitat areas
E.
In updating the Street Tree Plan, identify specific species of trees that should
1-2 Years
be planted to be compatible with the street environment
63 How Do We Get There?
Packet Pg. 256
8.1.a
How Are We Doing?
Monitoring and
Measuring Results
The UFMP includes goals and actions for measuring
the success of planning strategies. It is intended
that the Plan serves as a living document. As new
information becomes available, this section of the
UFMP will be reviewed and amended using routine
plan updates, annual reports, and community
satisfaction surveys.
5-10 Year Plan Update
(Plan 2023)
The UFMP is an active tool that will guide
management and planning decisions over the next
twenty ( 20) years. The goals and actions will be
reviewed every five to ten (5 -10) years for progress
and integration into an internal work plan. The
UFMP presents a long-range vision and target dates
are intended to be flexible in response to emerging
opportunities, available resources, and changes
in community expectations. Therefore, each year,
specific areas of focus should be identified. This can
inform budget and time requirements for Urban
Forest Managers.
Annual State of the Urban
Forest Report
This report, delivered annually, should include
numbers of trees planted and removed by the City,
and any changes to the overall community urban
forest. It will serve as a performance report to
stakeholders and an opportunity for engagement.
The report is also an opportunity to highlight the
successful attainment of UFMP actions as well as to
inform stakeholders about any issues or stumbling
blocks. This information can be integrated into
urban forest managers' Annual Reports and used to
pursue additional project support and funding from
state agencies and Tree City USA applications.
Community Satisfaction
The results of the UFMP will be measurable in
improvements to efficiency and reductions in costs
for maintenance activities. Attainment of the goals
and actions will support better tree health, greater
longevity, and a reduction of tree failures. However,
perhaps the greatest measurement of success for
the UFMP will be its ability to meet community
expectations for the care and preservation of the
urban forest resource.
Community satisfaction can be measured through
surveys as well as by monitoring public support
for realizing the goals and actions of the Plan.
Community satisfaction can also be gauged by
the level of engagement and support for urban
forest programs. An annual survey of urban forest
stakeholders will help managers ensure activities
continue to be aligned with the community's vision
for the urban forest.
c
a
c
a�
E
a�
c
L
0
U_
c
L
0
MI
to
o�
CD
0
N
a
2
U_
a
c
0
E
w
a
c
as
E
0
M
a
How Are We Doing? 64
Packet Pg. 257
8.1.a
Appendices
Appendix A: References
Akbari, H., D. Kurn, et al. 1997. Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings
25:139-148.
American Forests, 2007, http://www.americanforests.org
Bennett, M. and Shaw, D. 2008. Diseases and Insect Pests of Pacific Madrone. Forest Health Fact Sheet EC 1619-E
California Oak Mortality Task Force, 2019. https://suddenoakdeath.org.
Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Company. The National Tree Benefit Calculator, 2017.
http://www.treebenefits.com/calculator/
CensusScope, 2012, "CensusScope: Your Portal to Census 2000 Data." www.censusscope.org
Ciesla, WW.M. and Ragenovich, I.R. 2008. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 119. Western Tent Caterpillar. USFS.
City of Edmonds, 2015, Edmonds Streetscape Plan, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services.
City of Edmonds, 2016, Citizens' Tree Board.
City of Edmonds, 2016, Comprehensive Plan, City of Edmonds Department of Development Services, Planning
Division, Edmonds, Washington.
City of Edmonds, 2016, Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Plan, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services.
City of Edmonds, 2017, Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Report, City of Edmonds Department of Development
Services, Edmonds, Washington.
City of Seattle, 2012, http://www.seattle.gov/parks/ProParks/
Clark, James, N. Matheny, G. Cross, V. Wake, 1997, A Model of Urban Forest Sustainability, Journal of
Arboriculture 23(1): January 1997.
Colorado State University Extension, 2003, Bronze Birch Borer, Image, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/3/3d/Agri I us_a nxi us_1326203.j pg
Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid. 2015. Natural Resources Canada.
Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-313). Q
Donovan, G and Butry D, 2010, Trees in the City: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon Landscape and Urban
Planning. E
Energy Information Administration, 2003, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2003.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/ a
Evergreen Cities Task Force, 2009, A Guide to Community and Urban Forestry Planning,
Washington State Department of Commerce.
https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/rp_urban_guide_to_urban_forestry_programming.pdf
Faber Taylor, A. & Kuo, F.E., 2006, "Is contact with nature important for healthy child development?" State
of the evidence. In Spencer, C. & Blades, M. (Eds.), Children and Their Environments: Learning, Using and
Designing Spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
b: Appendices
Packet Pg. 258
8.1.a
Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade (FACT) Act of 1990 — P.L. 101-624.
Forest Insect and Disease Leaflets, 2017 - Laminated Root Rot. USDA Forest Service
https://apps.fs.usda.gov/views/laminatedrootrot
Heisler, G.M., 1986, "Energy savings with trees." Journal of Arboriculture, 12, 113-25.
Hartel, D, 2003, "GASB 34: Urban Natural Resources as Capital Assets", 2003 National Urban Forest
Conference, Southern Center for Urban Forestry Research & Information.
Hollingsworth, C.S., editor. 2019. Pacific Northwest Insect Management Handbook [online]. Corvallis, OR:
Oregon State University. http://pnwhandbooks.org/insect (accessed 31 March 2019).
i-Tree. , 2012, Tools for Assessing and Managing Community Forest. www.itreetools.org
Jo, H.-K. and E.G. McPherson. 1995. Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. Journal of
Environmental Management. 45:109-133
Kaplan, Rachel and Stephen. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Karl, Tom., P. Harley, L. Emmons, B. Thornton, A. Guenther, C. Basu, A Turnipseed, K. Jardine. 2010, Efficient
Atmospheric Cleansing of Oxidized Organic Trace Gases by Vegetation. Web 11/9/2010. http://www.
sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/330/6005/816
Kenny, Andy, P. van Wassenaer, A.L.Satel, 2011, Criteria and Indicators for Strategic Urban Forest Planning and
Management, Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 37(3):108-117.
Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C., 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?
Environment & Behavior, 33(3), 343-367.
Kuo, F.E., 2003. The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology: Invited review article for a Special Section
Journal of Arboriculture 29(3), 148-155.
Land and Water Conservation Fund, 2012, nps.gov. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.
http://www.nps.gov/lwcf/
Miller, R. W. 1988. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
The Nature Conservancy. 2012, www.nature.org
The National Arbor Day Foundation, 2012, Tree City USA Award, http://www.arborday.org/
Natural Resources Canada. 2015. Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.
2005. Forest Health Protection —Emerald Ash Border. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.
http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/eab/index.html
Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. 2005. Forest Health Protection —Dutch Elm Disease. Newtown
Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry.
http://na.fs.fed.us/fhp/ded
Oregon State University (OSU), 2017. College of Forestry, Swiss Needle Cast.
http://sncc.forestry.oregonstate.edu/glossary/term/17
PNW Plant Disease Handbook
PNW Insect Handbook
r
M
I
co
0
I
rn
0
N
a
U_
D
a
U)
c
0
w
r
r
Q
c
a�
E
c�
a
Appendices 66
Packet Pg. 259
8.1.a
Pscheidt, J.W., and Ocamb, C.M., senior editors. 2019. Pacific Northwest Plant Disease Management
Handbook [online]. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. http://pnwhandbooks.org/plantdisease (accessed
31 March 2019).
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, 2012, http://www.pscleanair.org/
Puget Sound Partnership, 2012, www.psparchives.com
Science Now. Tree Leaves Fight Pollution. October 2010. sciencemag.org. Web 11/05/2010.
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/10/tree-leaves-fight-pollution.html
Simpson, James, 2002. "Improved estimates of tree -shade effects on residential use," Energy and Buildings
34, 1067-1076.
Simpson, J.R. and E.G. McPherson. 2000. Energy and air quality improvements through urban tree planting.
In: Kollin, C., (ed.). Building cities of green: proceedings of the 1999 national urban forest conference; Seattle.
Washington, D.C.: American Forests: 110-112.
"Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1." Trees Near Power Lines I Residential I Snohomish County
PUD, 15 Dec. 2017, www.snopud.com/home/treetrim.ashx?p=1219.
The Trust for Public Lands. 2012, www.tpl.org
U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Division, 2017. Urban Ecosystems and Processes (UEP).
https://www.fs.fed. us/psw/topics/urba n_forestry/
U.S. Department of Energy, 2004. "Green Roofs," Federal Technology Alert DOE/EE-0298, Federal Energy
Management Program.
Washington Department of Ecology, 2011— Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control,
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/93-30/index.html
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2009. Land Use Planning For Salmon, Steelhead and Trout.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00033/psst_externa I reviewd raft_ju nel52009.pdf
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Periodic Status Review for the Bald Eagle.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01825/draft_wdfw01825.pdf
Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2018. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/
Washington State, 1990. Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070 (1) Land Use
Elementl).
Washington State University Extension, 2008, WSU Extension Publishing and Printing, o
http://cru.cahe.wsu.edu/CEPublications/ebl380e/ebl380e.pdf w
Wickman, Boyd, et al., 1988. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet Douglas -Fir Tussock Moth 86. r
https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/topics/urban_ forestry/ Q
Wolf, K.L. 1998, "Urban Nature Benefits: Psycho -Social Dimensions of People and Plants". University of
Washington Center for Urban Horticulture, Human Dimensions of the Urban Forest, Fact Sheet #1. E
Wolf, K.L. 2007. The Environmental Psychology of Trees. International Council of Shopping Centers Research
Review. 14, 3:39-43. a
Xiao, Q.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Ustin, S.L. 2007. Hydrologic processes at the urban residential scale.
Hydrological Processes 21:2174-2188.
Xiao, Q., E.G. McPherson, S.L. Usfin and M.E. Grismer. 2000. A new approach to modeling tree rainfall
interception. Journal of Geophysical Research 105(D23) :29,173-29,188
67 Appendices
Packet Pg. 260
8.1.a
Appendix B9. Table of Figures
P-jures
Figure 1: Land Cover Classes 5,23
Figure 2: Fragmentation Comparison 24
Figure 3: Forest Fragmentation 25
Figure 4: Tree Canopy by Park 27
Figure 5: Most Valuable Environmental Benefit 53
Figure 6: Most Valuable Intangible Benefit 54
Figure 7: Maintenance Expectations 55
Tabler
Table 1: Benchmark Values 3
Table 2: Tree Canopy of 5 Largest Parks 27
Table 3: Acres of Sensitive Area by Fragmentation 28
Table 4: Percent Sensitive Area by Fragmentation 29
Table 5: Decision matrix for urban forest management in Edmonds 31
Table 6: 2016 Urban Forestry Expenditures 32
Table 7: Current Urban Forest Workload and Staffing Levels 32
Table 8: Summary of Current City of Edmonds Tree Cutting Regulations 40
Appendice, 68
Packet Pg. 261
8.1.a
Appendix C:
Community Survey Responses
Introduction:
The survey questions provided a public feedback
opportunity during the early stages of plan
development. They were designed to solicit
input from residents and businesses in the City of
Edmonds and help guide the plan development
by understanding about how respondents.
The questions were arranged into 4 groups:
• How do you value trees?
• Your opinion about public trees. (City
managed trees on streets and in parks)
• Your opinion about private trees. (privately
managed trees)
• Who are you? (Simple Demographics)
While providing valuable information, the results
of this survey should not be interpreted to be a
statistically significant survey representing all
of Edmonds. 175 individuals responded to the
survey (0.4 percent of the Edmonds population)
and the geographic distribution of respondents
was not a control factor, as a result the survey
responses may include an over representation
of view properties. However, these responses
do represent views of many citizens who are
particularly interested in the management of
the City's urban forest.
Question 2: Trees are known to provide benefits to the environment. Understanding which benefits
are most appreciated by residents can help guide long-term management strategies. Please rank (1-5)
the following ENVIRONMENTAL benefits in order of their value to you. (i.e., 1 = most valuable and 5 =
least valuable):
Ilmprovec ' Quality
Energy Savings
FProtect Water Quality/Reduced Stormwater Runoff
Carbon Storage
Wildlife Habitat
Other
69 Appendices
Packet Pg. 262
8.1.a
Question 1: Trees are important to the quality of life in Edmonds.
Responses
Strongly Agree
74.86%
131
Agree
21.71%
38
lisagree
2.297.
Strongly Disagree
0.57%
1
Not sur
0.00%
0
Not Sure
0.57%
1
Other (please specify)
0.00%
0
Question 2 (Extended)
36.57%
64
24.00%
4
7
14.29% jA
4.57%
8
5.14%
9
13.71%
24
26.86% 47
21.71%
38
36.57%
64
25.71%
45
10.29M 8
8.57%
15
8.57%
15
17.14%
30
36.00% 63
28.57%
50
45
22.29%
39
12.57% 22
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00% 0
49.71% 87
P5.71%14FRO
29.71% 52
10.86% 19
0.00% 0
175 2.88
17
175 3.3
1175]64.49
0 0
Appendices 70
Packet Pg. 263
8.1.a
Question 3: Trees also provide less tangible benefits to society. Understanding which of these benefits
are most appreciated by residents can help guide long-term management strategies. Please rank (1-8)
the following AESTHETIC and/or SOCIOECONOMIC benefits in order of their value to you. (i.e., 1= most
valuable and 8 = least valuable):
Attractive to Residents
14.86%
26
21.71%
38
16.00%
28
13.14%
23
Beauty/Aesthetics
34.29%
60
21.14%
37
14.86%
26
14.29%
25
_
Shaded Trails,sidewalks, and bike trails
21.71%
38
17.14%
30
24.00%
42
11.43%
20
Shaded Parking
2.86%
5
3.43%
6
8.57%
15
9.71%
17
rover wand neighborhoo
14%
9
10.29%
1
°
22
13.71%
24
Increased Property Values
4.00%
7
5.14%
9
5.14%
9
9.71%
17
Passive recreati0
9
6.86%
12
12.00 /
21
Shaded streets/Buffer from vehicles713*14%/o
23
16.00%
28
12.00%
21
16.00%
28
Question 4: Optional. Use this space to provide additional comments on the benefits of Edmonds'
public trees.
Answered 60
Skipped
115
Question 5: What is your current awareness of the City's urban forest program? Please check all that
apply.
I was not aware that t
I have visited the City's webpage for information about public trees and/or the urban forest
I have read a newspaper article that discussed public trees and/or Edmonds' urban forest
I have participated or volunteered with tree related events in the City
Other (please specify)
71 Appendices
Packet Pg. 264
8.1.a
Question 3 (Extended)
15.43%
27
9.71%
17
6.86 %
12
2. 29%
4
7.43%
13
2.86%
5
2.29%
4
2.86%
5
9.71%
17
9.7�7
4.57%
8
1.71%
3
29.71%
52
8.57% 15
17.71% 31
19.43% 34
1.143%
34
18. 9%
32
1F29%
25
6.29%
11
10.29%
18
13.71%
24
22.86%
40
29.14%
51
14.86%
26
20.00%
35
21.
15.43% 27
13.71%
24
13.14%
23
9.71%
17
6.29%
11
Question 5 (Extended)
36.69%
62
23.67%
40
52.07%
88
14.79%
25
0
�5.39
175 6.29
175 3.03
175 4.25
175 3.05
175 4.89
Appendices 72
Packet Pg. 265
8.1.a
Question 6: Trees can grow to obstruct streets and sidewalks. How often do you encounter this issue
with trees in the public rights -of -way.
Daily 13.02% 22
Weekly 11.83% 20
10.65 % 18
Several Times AYear 34.32% 58
Never J 30.18% 51
Answered .•
Skipped 61
Question 7: Trees can become damaged or develop structural weakness over time, these issues may
be risks for injury to persons or property. How often do you encounter this issue with public trees?
&J 9
Weekly 4.14% 7
- 2.96% 5
Several Times A Year 41.42% 70
Never 46.15% 78
Question 8: Trees can appear sick and unhealthy from damage by insects, diseases, or simply poor tree
care regimes. How often do you observe this issue with public trees?
i 5.33AMb 9
Weekly _ 2.96% 5
/lonthly 5.92% 10
Several Times A Year 43.20% 73
Never 42.60% 72
73 Appendices
Packet Pg. 266
8.1.a
Question 9: In general, I am satisfied with the current level of maintenance provided for Edmonds'
public trees.
Strongly agr�
10.65%
18
Agree
59.17%
100
Disagree
11.83%
20
Strongly Disagree
8.88%
15
Not Su
9.47%
16
Answered
169
Skipped
61
M
to
I
0
0
I
T
0
N
a
2
a_
M
a
c
0
E
w
a
C
CD
M
a
Appendice,
Packet Pg. 267
8.1.a
Question 10: What level of maintenance would you prefer for public trees? Please rank the following
options according to your preference (1 = most desirable; 5 = Least desirable)
None -Keep them natural
Best possible care (all trees should look good)
Clearance only (keep th ewalks and streets clear)
Take care of hazardous trees.
Holistic Plant Health Care (Improve the urban forest, but not necessarily every tree)
Question 11: Edmonds needs more public trees.
jWngly Agree
A7.87%
64
Agree
28.99%
49
Fsagree
17.16%
29
Strongly disagree
5.33%
9
not sure
10.65%
1
Xnmswwered•
Skipped
Question 12: Where would you like to see more public trees planted? Please check as many as apply.
59.17% 100
Open spaces and Natural Areas 60.36%
102
59.17%
100
Golf Courses 11.24%
19
Downtown 42.60%
72
Trails and bike paths 45.56% 77
dmonds has enough public trees 20.12% 34
Other (please specify) 17.75% 30
Answered 11F .•
Skipped
M
�I
0
I
T
O
N
a
a_
M
a
c
0
E
w
a
CD
E
M
0
M
a
75 Appendices
Packet Pg. 268
8.1.a
Question 10 (Extended)
3.55%
6
8.88%
15
10.06%
17 25.44%
43
45.56%
77
6.51%
11
169
1.92
15.38%
26
9.47%
16
21.89%
37 26.04%
44
23.08%
39
4.14%
7
169
2.67
6.51%
11
24.26%
41
27.81%
47 26.04%
44
10.65%
18
4.73%
8
169
2.89
52.07%
88
26.04%
44
14.20%
24 5.33%
9
1.78%
3
0.59%
1
169
4.22
21.89%
37
30.18%
51
23.08%
39 12.43%
21
8.28%
14
4.14%
1
3.47
IL
c
a�
E
a�
a�
CU
r_
m
a�
L
0
LL
r_
M
L
L
r
Cr)
co
I
0
rn
I
0
N
IL
w
D
Q
c
0
E
w
r
r
Q
r
c
a�
E
R
Q
Appendices 76
Packet Pg. 269
8.1.a
Question 13: What types of education and public outreach would you like to see offered by the urban
forestry program? Please check all that apply.
eminars and workshops 1 44.38%
75
Interpretive trails and displays 59.76%
101
Website resources MMMISM 62.72%
106
Online videos (e.g. YouTube) 24.26%
41
/tree walks 55�
Informational brochures 43.20%
73
Other (please specify) 11.83% 20
Question 14: Optional. Please use this space for any additional comments about the care of public
trees.
Answered 40
Skipped 135
Question 15: What is/are your biggest concern for trees in Edmonds? (Check as many as apply)
Trees blocking my view 24.70% 41
Trees shading my yard 9.04% 15
Tree debris in 12.65% 21
Healthy mature trees being removed during development 68.67% 114
rnopy loss 57.83% 96
Loss of wildlife habitat 72.29% 120
Other Concerns(please specify)
M
0
T
O
N
a
U-
M
a
c
0
E
w
a
c
CD
E
M
0
M
a
%% Appendices
Packet Pg. 270
8.1.a
Question 16: What are your experiences with trees on nearby properties around you? Please select
any from this list any statements you agree with.
■
Trees near my property are a nuisance 11.98% 20
Trees near my property are a dangerous
17.37%
29
Trees near my property block views
29.34%
49
Trees near my property are beautiful
67.66%
113
Trees near nWpropqlF are healthy
59.28%
99
1 want more trees near my property
25.15%
42
have no trees near my property
0.637o
I don't agree with any of these statements.
2.40%
4
Question 17: When private properties are developed or improved, trees on the property can be
impacted. Should the City be involved with protecting trees on private property during construction?
Answer Choices ..
Yes. The City should require property owners to
preserve trees on private parcels where
reasonably possible. 53.89% 90
No. This City of Edmonds should not concern
itself with trees on private property. 17.96% 30
Not sure. This issue is more complicated. 28.14% 47
Appendices 78
Packet Pg. 271
8.1.a
Question 18: In your opinion, what are the best ways to encourage tree planting and preservation on
private property? Please select as many as apply.
I
Education and outreach 79.04% 132
Information about how to hire a professional tree care company 29.34% 49
Require tree care companies to have a certified arborist on staff 28.74% 48
Free (or low-cost) Trees 55.09% 92
Ordinances, Rules or Regulations 35.33% 59
Other (please specify) 22.75% 38
Question 19: Optional. Please use this space for any additional comments about trees on private
property.
ditional Comments
Answered .,
Skipped 131
Question 20: Which gender do you identify with?
Answer Choices
Male 28.66% 47
Female 59.76% 98
Lender Divers eR3% 3
Prefer not to answer 9.76% 16
79 Appendices
Packet Pg. 272
8.1.a
Question 21: What age group are you representing?
Under 18
0.00%
0
18 to 25
1.22%
2
26 to 35
4.27%
7
36 to 45
11.59%
19
46 to 55
21.34%
35
56+
61.59%
101
Question 22: Where do you live in Edmonds? Please choose a neighborhood from the list below
Downtown/The Bowl
40.85%
67
Westgate
7.32%
12
rive Corners
8.54%
14
Perrinville
4.88%
8
IMeadowdale M4.27%
7
Seaview
15.24%
25
Lake Ballinger
22%
2
HWY 99
3.05%
5
ther (please specify)
14.63%
24
Appendice, 80
Packet Pg. 273
Question 23: What is your relationship with Edmonds' urban forest. (Choose all that apply)
8.1.a
I am a resident of Edmonds M
95.12%
156
1 am a frequent visitor to Edmonds
10.98%
18
1 own a business in Ed on s
6.71%
11
I appreciate public trees
72.56%
119
1 have planted public trees as a volunteer
18.90%
J1
I help care for a public tree adjacent to my property
10.98%
18
have donated money to a non-profit foundation in support of public trees
15.85%
31
None of the above
0.61%
1
81 Appendices
Packet Pg. 274
8.1.a
Question 24: Please provide any additional comments
or feedback (Optional)
Answered 33
Skipped 142
r
r
Q
c
W
E
a
Appendice, 82
Packet Pg. 275
8.1.a
Appendix D: Open House
Summary Report
On June 22nd, 2017, the City of Edmonds hosted the
first of two open houses in the Brackett Room at City
Hall to share information about the City of Edmonds
Urban Forestry Management Plan and gather input
from citizens.
The open house included a presentation by Ian
Scott of Davey Resource Group and a brief Q and
A from the audience to ask clarifying questions.
The presentation provided attendees an overview
of Edmonds' urban forest, an introduction to what
will be included in the Urban Forest Management
Plan, and that the Davey Resource Group team has
completed to date. Following the presentation,
attendees were invited to provide input- thoughts,
ideas, concerns, questions- on six discussion/opinion
boards where a broad topic was introduced on each
board followed by initial suggestions generated
through the prior stakeholder interview process.
Attendees were invited to express their opinions
using dots (where green= a positive "vote"/
agreement for the suggestion, yellow= concern/
hesitation of the suggestion, and red= a negative
"vote"/disagreement or dislike of the suggestion).
Attendees were invited to use as many dots of
each color necessary to express their opinion of
each suggestion on each board. In addition, each
board provided an area for Additional Suggestions
where attendees were invited to write down their
thoughts, ideas, concerns, questions on a sticky note
and adhere it to the board for other attendees to
review and "vote" on, as well. Lastly, a confidential
and anonymous option was provided for attendees
to provide comments and feedback by writing their
thoughts, ideas, concerns and questions on index
cards that were placed inside a box and not shared
at the public meeting.
The Davey Resource Group team also provided a link
for attendees to give additional feedback through an
online survey. That survey can be accessed via the
home page on the City of Edmonds website, under
the "What's New..." section:
• https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
EdmondsUFMP
Local media provided public announcements of the
open house leading up to the event:
• http://myedmondsnews.com/2017/06/
rem inder-open-house-managing-citys-tree-
cover-set-june-22/
• https://edmondsbeacon.villagesoup.com/p/
open-house-planned-to-discuss-managing-city-
s-tree-cover/1660111?source=WeeklyHeadlines
My Edmonds News covered the open house and
provided a news story and video of the presentation
to the public:
• http://myedmondsnews.com/2017/06/public-
asked-share-ideas-managing-edmonds-urban-
forest/
• http://myedmondsnews.com/2017/06/now-
video-open-house-plan-manage-edmonds-
urban-forests/
83 Appendices
Packet Pg. 276
8.1.a
Opinion Board #1: What tree benefits do you most appreciate?
A. Improved Air Quality
-
B. Energy Savings
elllbMReduced StormwateglMnoff
■
D. Carbon Storage
ET Wildlife Habitat
■
F. Beauty/Aesthetics
G. Shaded trails, sidewalks, and bike
H. Improved retail areas and neighborhoods
I. Increased prope
J. Shaded streets and parking lots
K. Additional Ideas
Wind protection (think roof shingles); noise reduction; shade-
calm/healing; sound of wind through branches; hi -class (untreed
neighborhoods proven to have higher crime- "the projects"
don't get trees, Bellevue does); soil retention; cools streams;
coastal trees involved in weather cycle to prevent inland
desertification
City revenue increase with more views
Air quality requires big, tall trees
4
A&
7
14
12
4
3
_7
4
0 0
Mro-
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
1 4
2 3
1 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
Appendice,
Packet Pg. 277
8.1.a
Opinion Board #2: What types of outreach and education are I -
nrAfArrArl /vali iorl7
A. Electronic (websites, links, youtube, apps)
2
0
0
i. Species selection
4
0
0
ii
1
0
0
iii. Tree pruning
4
1
0
Interactive tree selector
1
1
0
V. Irrigation
1
0
0
olunteer opportunities
1
0
0
B. Hard copy (pamphlets, newsletter)
3
0
0
Species selectio�
3
1
0
ii. Tree planting
1
0
0
iii. Tree pruning
3
1
0
iv. Irrigation
0
0
0
C. Hands-on (Workshops, seminars)
2
0
0
i. Tree planting
2
0
0
Tree pruning
5
0
0
iii. Irrigation
0
0
0
Volunteer opportunities
1
0
0
D. Additional Ideas
7
1
0
Neighborhoo Ings for education and outreach
0
0
Maybe a pamphlet with a map of specific trees of interest
0
0
0
Pamphlets telling what species of trees on city property
amount of carbon storage, % stormwater absorption- info which
appeared tied to Main St trees for a very short time. Maybe
0
story in the Beacon [local newspaper with print and online
circulation]
New name needed
0
0
0
85 Appendices
Packet Pg. 278
8.1.a
Opinion Board #3: What is/are your biggest concern(s) for trees
in Edmonds?
A. Trees blocking my view 11 1 9
B. Trees shading my yard
3 0 7
ft Tree debris in
1 5
D. Healthy mature trees being removed
12 0 3
[E. Canopy loss
3
F. Loss of wildlife habitat
15 0 3
Additional Co
Private development- current Edmonds land use code allows
developers to completely clear treed lots for development
1 0 0
(residential, commercial, etc). This is not okay. It disrupts urban
IS omeone who would be willing to negotiate or help mediate
V
between neighbors having difficulty with trees vs. view, perhaps
1 0 0
Lto come to the home if asked and accepted by both parties
Need to address invasives in our forests that prevent the
0 0 0
establishment of seedlings. Without that there will be no forests
Critical areas ordinances are not followed- All native vegetation
0 0
is removed for development
This becomes a question of aesthetics- learn to see trees, which
are beautiful and characteristic of the luxuriant NW where we
2 0 0
have chosen to reside- as the "view". Trees are very connected
to the idea of "the commons" in which we have not much
I believe these green dots indicate agreement with the stated
additional concern.
'Note: for this opinion board:
Green dots = concerned
Red dots = not concerned
Appendice, ov
Packet Pg. 279
8.1.a
Opinion Board #4: What level of maintenance would you prefer
for aublic trees?
A. None (keep them natural)
1
4 2
B. Best possible care (all trees should look good)
7
1 3
Mlearan� (keep sidewalks and streets clear)
7
1 1
D. Take care of hazardous trees
10
2 0
lolistic plant health care (improve the urban forest, but
not necessarily every tree)
8
3 0
F. Additional Ideas
In past, City has been resistant to allow removal of dangerous
and dying trees even when 3 arborists said remove. Need 0 0 0
process to effectively deal with dangerous trees.
Utilize/ plant and replace trees that "heave" the sidewalks. ie- 2 0 0
avoid trees that interfere with built environment.
Native trees preferred. Alder are not trash tree 0 0
Edmonds is a City of Views- Very important that property
owner's views are protected. As a first step/tonight's meeting
0 1 0
working together to protect environment as well as property
owners will put this plan in a more optimistic mode.
There were not actually green dots placed on this Additional
Idea sticky note, but two other people wrote "Agree" directly on
the note itself.
1111111ff-
87 Appendices
Packet Pg. 280
8.1.a
Opinion Board #5: Where would you like to see more trees
planted?
A. Parks
10
0 0
B. Open Spaces
10
0 1
Commercial properties
9
2 0
D. Streets and medians
7
3 2
_E. Parking lots
0
F. Private properties
8
1 1
G.
Along railroad- need tall ones to defray pollutants. Along all
1
0 0
arterials for same reason. Along streams to keep them cool
Appendices 88
Packet Pg. 281
8.1.a
Opinion Board #6: What are the best ways to encourage tree I M
planting and preservation on private property?
A. Free (or low-cost) trees
10
0
0
B. Information about how to hire a professional tree care
3
0
0
company
Education and Outreach
16i
0
0
D. Tree planting events
5
0
0
Additional Ideas
Update land use code so developers cannot clear all of the trees
when building. Current code allows to clear the entire lot.
3
0
1
Education- slow but steady so that folk begin to know that all
the oxygen we breathe is produced by (largely) trees- for "views"
0
0
0
we can cut out our lungs.
Provide ideas for good trees that are more like 15 ft tall in order
3
0
0
to keep both trees and preserve view.
City needs a full-time arborist. Codes should:
3
0
0
Neighbor education and outreach (about critical areas and
streamside property management more important than public
0
0
0
meetings for general public)
IL
c
a�
CU
r_
M
;v
0
w
r_
0
L
0
M
I
0
rn
I
0
N
IL
2
w
D
Q
c
0
E
w
r
Q
r
c
a�
E
z
R
Q
89 Appendices
Packet Pg. 282
1
1. W}rat tree benefit do YOU In*-9t
appreciate?
I
a repro ea 14.A vTy
* ie**!ri#i i
***i
twmr*a..iay{E�.3rva7.ceR.r.eYwRrrR-sN
#ii*i##•i*#• •
i"2GF"i
.+w.r.r#rr. r#•
r, Ilrew r/aw.I W�ri[.
ii •e*eiaiiir
u srwr.a r.. eeeii .
L �F4• i#
*ewe `� orALw,Y ibr
8.1.a
M M: ' r t
2. What types of vutreoth and 3. What is cre your Biggest ' L;
education are preferred valued? : concern(s) for trees in Edrnorlds?
A_ Electronic (Websile, links, Youfube, Apps)111 A. kaos blocking my aicw 1N
4. 5win fak.ri.hn 00 a* •
iii
i,. I.rrrssF.+Tn.esear is S. iroas shading my yard 040q&9 •
*. Nr;�eiy.s � • •
+�. WImsF..r oppnrr..,.eir.�
�. Hard Cot}y {PPrTrph�otS, P#ewirelt4•es j��
xrex r-anrw,p
:.o # •
C• M4rs¢F-On IWoricshnpsL, $eailnaFI)IDO
i Tr—?lnre:•p
iL T• ffl rs'Q Uses
iw 4.yrrilon
W. Yelrna.rrOFpa•hn4ier�
C- Tree dnhris in my yard
0 s ••
D- Hapllhy sr WFC teggsbrain-9 MMO%lad 0 •i
tr, Canopy loss * 4ft 000 00
I. Loss ofwirdld,aliebgal *@0aSo•0 •
0• 00* ♦ •
IX Additional Nana 11 o. A "liDwol Canc.ms
-
6. What are the best ways to
f encourage tree planting and
f 5. Where would you like to see more preservation on Private Property?
4. What level of rnalnte nonce would trees planted? q. Frap Iar low ea31� rraes
you prefer f4.11:[ frees?
A. Pura.
1 A, Noi IKeep fhcrnrwsyral) I i ** i i iiir •!•
�• Op4n $peers
•�• •rr
{. Commercial Propvnies
• ii ••*ii
D. Streets and Medians
i ee r
i* r
E. Parking Lots
% •ee i #
F'- p6VUN P+'aportias
i iii* r r
G. AddlTion011408s
i
i *
$. B.e.rpoaible Sars {olrtraes ilsasrld lank goad]
*
i ii i*err
C. ClIbumnce only jkawp sidewalks & stroe+s rlre.
•#ii iri
D- Tckv care of 6.... doo. 9-
0 iii •*iir i
E. Hdisric Planl firaF+i. Cwe jlmprova rh. w, hen
roM31, but ncl 4e4oFSPrily axary rree)
*ii e i e Is
F. Addl;onalld,— �-•t?
B, Information obour how to hire a professional
tree care I tympany
is
C. EdtMo600andOuTraach
I:r# •
Il!
O, Troo Naming [venis
•0so*
[• A�dihe+►at IdePs
Q
Appendices 90
Packet Pg. 283
8.1.a
Additional anonymous comments:
Change name "Urban Forest"- bad impression,
oxymoron. Suggestion- Best plant/tree for Best
location
• Wondering what is/can be done to encourage
people to maintain views for neighbors
around them?
• Let's separate view areas from non -view areas.
Right tree for right location.
I am concerned about safety regarding older
trees in both private and public spaces. We
have 70+ year old trees in our neighborhood
that lose branches with most wind storms.
Who watches out for the health of those trees
and probability of danger? Most people would
have no idea where to begin, let alone be able
to afford to do something like hire an arborist.
(signed J Thompson)
Questions from the public asked during the
presentation:
Question regarding how the 30% canopy cover
was determined- comment that that number
seemed really high. Wondering if there is
a uniform process used by all cities. Made
comment that grants were judged by how much
canopy a City had. Asked for clarification on
what the process that was used to determine
30% canopy cover.
• Question asking for clarification of the intention
of the UFMP- to handle City trees (as stated
in an early slide) or is it actually expanded to
handle private trees too.
Commenter asked for clarification on defining
"what is a tree"- a 30ft lilac ... is that a tree? A
big rhododendron- is that a tree?
• Commenter referring to tree planting
suggestions (provided an sign in table on yellow
paper)- had a question about why is there not
any evergreen on that suggestion guide?
Commenter asked question regarding tree
topping being preferable to cutting a tree to
the ground. Expressed concern over making a
"blanket rule" that tree topping is bad or not
preferable.
• Question regarding information on what kinds
of trees do what kinds of things- eg. a fir
versus an oak- and where is that kind of data
available at?
Question referring to the chart shown in the
presentation comparing Edmonds with other
cities- does that chart take into consideration
view property- does it differentiate where there
are view properties and where there are not?
Commenter suggested that a significant portion
of the City [of Edmonds] has views.
91 Appendices
Packet Pg. 284
8.1.a
Attendance
City of Edmonds:
• Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council
• Shane Hope, Development Services Director
• Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation & Cultural
Services Director
• Phil Williams, Public Works and Utilities Director
• Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
• Rich Lindsay, Park Maintenance Manager
• Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program
Manager
• Brad Shipley, Planner
• Debora Ladd, Parks Maintenance Staff
Project Team Members:
• Ian Scott, Davey Resources Group
• Ian Lefcourte, Davey Resources Group
• Keeley O'Connell, Nature InSight Consulting
Members of the public:
• Approximately 50
Appendice- 92
Packet Pg. 285
appropriate step. With regard to a celebration, she agreed with doing more than a statement and suggested
the Council direct the Diversity Commission to think about an annual event or activities that the Diversity
Commission could oversee.
Ms. Hope concluded staff will try to get some input from the Tribes.
8. ACTION ITEM
1. DRAFT URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
Development Services Director Shane Hope reviewed:
• History
o Edmonds area was once largely forested
o Trees removed by settlers & loggers in late 1800s and early 1900s
o As town grew up, new trees sprouted or were planted
o City government has maintained trees in ROWs and on City property
o City has code for tree cutting & management on private property (esp. critical areas) but code
could use some updates
o In 2016, Tree Board recommended adopting new code to require minimum # of trees on each
private property, along with arborist reviews & permits for cutting trees on private property
o Council chose instead to have an Urban Forest Management Plan developed, which could guide
long-term tree management, especially on public property, and provide policy guidance,
including education & incentives, for managing trees on private property
o UFMP began in 2017, including
■ Consultation with Tree Board
■ Consultation with Planning Board
■ Consultation with staff
■ Community outreach such as:
- Press releases
- Open houses
- Survey
n
- City website with UFMP info a,
- Newsletters update x
o Numerous meetings agendas —
■ Tree Board c
■ Planning Board v
■ City Council
o Public hearing (with notices) `4
■ Planning Board Q
■ City Council
c
o UFMP Revisions made along the way, including 3 draft versions:
■ July 2018
■ Nov 2018
■ May/June 2019 a
Comments on prior drafts
0 4 categories of complaints
1. Wanting UFMP to set framework for adopting more restrictions on private property
2. Wanting UFMP to point up more issues with trees (including problems, not just benefits)
3. Wanting UFMP to have more local information
4. Requesting various "clean-up" & technical corrections
o Categories of agreement or support
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 25, 2019
Page 17
Packet Pg. 286
8.1.b
■ Appreciation of improvements
■ General support for Goals
■ General support for recommended actions
What was done between November 2018 draft and May 2019 draft:
o Informal committee formed in early 2019 to work on improvements
o Changes made, including:
■ More attention to native trees
■ Rewrite of diseases and pests section
■ Removal of map and references to specific tree planting "opportunity areas" (but still
encouraging planting)
■ Modification of statements not backed by scientific findings for our region
■ More background discussion of tree issues
■ Additional information about City regulations for development
■ Additional information on selecting trees ("right tree, right place")
■ Additional information on trimming trees
■ Caveat about applicability of survey that has been done early in UFMP process
■ Removal of reverences to specific dollar amounts represented by tree functions (but still
recognizing value of trees in many ways)
Contents of Current Draft Plan
o Background, Edmonds Context & Purpose
o Public process
o Benefits & Challenges of Urban Forest
o Tree Selection Factors
o State Regulatory Framework
o City Planning Framework
o Tree Canopy Cover Information
o Planting opportunities
o Edmonds' Urban Forest Practices
o Major & Emerging Diseases & Pests
o City Regulatory Framework
o Regional Resources
o Case Studies
o Summary of Needs
o Goals & Actions
• Overarching UFMP Goals
1. Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage �°�
A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on urban forest N
& to consider changes to tree replacement requirements & penalties for code violations
B. Adopt policy of no net loss to overall Q
C. Ensure protection of tree resources in environmentally critical areas c
D. Develop voluntary heritage tree program E
E. Enforce City regulations on tree -cutting
F. Establish tree bank or fund to which donations can be made
G. Support sustainable ways to combat pests & diseases a
H. Consider need for dedicated City arborist
I. Report every 10 years on canopy coverage
J. Periodically update UFMP
2. Manage public trees proactively
A. Use best available science in caring urban forest on City properties & ROW
B. Have adequate resources (staff, contractual help, training, etc.) to monitor health of public trees
& make decisions on their care
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 25, 2019
Page 18
Packet Pg. 287
8.1.b
C. Develop & maintain inventory of trees in key public places to document tree condition & risks
D. Update Street Tree Plan periodically
E. Support removal of invasive plants that threaten trees
F. Coordinate among departments on tree issues & identify lead City staff person
G. Develop & implement tree planting plan on City property & ROW to ensure diversity &
suitability
H. Implement program of regular maintenance for City trees
I. Lead or facilitate volunteer activities for tree planting/care on City property & ROW
J. As part of City -sponsored capital projects, provide funding for appropriate trees in ROW & on
City properties
K. Provide annual report City Council on tree management for City properties & ROW
3. Incentivize protecting and planting trees on private property
A. Have program of giving away trees &/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds
B. For properties that retain certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of
incentives (with examples named)
C. Develop certification/awards program to public recognize property owners that maintain
certain amount or type of healthy trees
4. Provide resources to community to educate/inform on tree planting and care
A. Provide signage or other information about significant public trees
B. Provide for Tree Board, esp. to: develop community education materials; participate in or
initiate tree planting & tree care activities; report annually on Tree Board activities
C. Develop & disseminate info for public on value of trees & to provide guidance on tree selection
& management
5. Promote "right tree, right place"
A. Make readily available list of compatible trees in various kinds of settings
B. Identify key areas to increase canopy & for private properties, encourage appropriate tree
planting or other techniques; for public property, act appropriately plant trees or otherwise
increase canopy
C. Identify & plan for care of unsuitable trees &, as necessary, for pruning or removal when they
are potential damaging to people, buildings, or infrastructure
D. Ensure that development regulations require native trees & vegetation to be planted in critical
areas, esp. near streams & other wildlife habitat areas
E. In updating Street Tree Plan, identify specific species of trees that should be planted to be
compatible with street environment
• What will happen when UFMP is adopted?
o Implementation can get underway, including actions identified for each goal, starting with most
critical activities
o Monitoring of UFMP goals & actions can begin
o UFMP can be re-evaluated in 5-10 years & adjusted as needed
• Recommendation
o Adopt UFMP either tonight or on Consent Calendar
Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis requested the UFMP be presented to the Tree Board at their meeting
this Thursday and have them provide guidance on a mission statement. She commented the Tree Board has
Goal 4 covered. She thanked Mr. Demmick who spent over 300 hours on the UFMP, Bill Phipps who
looked at many other UFMPs, Frank Russo who rewrote the pest section, Kernen Lien, Shane Hope, Carrie
Hite, Rich Lindsay, Jesse Curran, Debra Dill, and many others. She concluded this draft was not perfect
but it was better than the previous.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
TEITZEL TO EXTEND FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Q
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 25, 2019
Page 19
Packet Pg. 288
8.1.b
Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis recommended a 30% tree canopy. She suggested providing more
background information for Council such as a comparison of tree canopy in other cities.
Councilmember Nelson referred to Goal 1, Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage, and
recommended picking one; saying both is not clear enough. He preferred enhance although he recognized
that may not be tangible. With regard to Item F, Establish tree bank or fund to which donations can be
made, he recommended starting that within a year.
Councilmember Teitzel commented this document is far superior to where it started; the consultant has
incorporated the input into this draft. He agreed with Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis' suggestion to
have the Tree Board provide additional input. He viewed the UFMP not as a specific action plan, but as a
directionally plan to point the City in the right way. He has heard complaints that it does not go far enough,
it is not stern enough about protecting trees on private property. However, that was not the direction to the
consultant. In 2015, citizens expressed concerns about property rights to the Planning Board when the Tree
Code was proposed. With that in mind, the consultant was directed to focus primarily on public trees. There
is more that needs to be done with regard to private trees.
Councilmember Mesaros agreed with Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis' suggestion to allow the Tree
Board to review the UFMP. Ms. Hope said the Tree Board did look at the UFMP at their last meeting
(Councilmember Buckshnis was absent). Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien said the UFMP
was provided to the Tree Board the afternoon of their meeting so there was not a lot of discussion.
Councilmember Mesaros suggested waiting a week to allow the Tree Board to provide comment.
Councilmember Mesaros appreciated Councilmember Nelson's comment about maintain or enhance,
agreeing those two words send difference messages. He liked "enhance" because the City should strive to
enhance not just maintain its urban forest. Even small, incremental increases are enhancement.
Councilmember Mesaros recalled complaints about development on undeveloped properties where all the E
mature trees are cut down. He asked about requirements for replacing those trees. Mr. Lien answered if °
there are no critical areas and it is a flat, developable property, there are no tree density requirements on n
private property. Councilmember Mesaros said this is a beginning; he was hopeful over the next several
years consideration be given to whether it was feasible to require for every tree that cut down, two be X
planted. He acknowledged those trees would be smaller and hopefully would be the right tree in the right
place; trees provide shelter, shade, protection against wind and absorb CO2. Ms. Hope said that is addressed
in Goal LA, Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on urban forest G
t�
and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations. Councilmember
Mesaros summarized on the whole, this is a much better document that the previous version.
Q
Ms. Hope summarized the UFMP will be presented to the Tree Board for input and then returned to the
City Council.
E
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Q
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas reported the applications for the Housing Commission have been
distributed to Councilmembers by their assigned zone. She asked about a date by which Councilmembers
needed to select two commissioners and one alternate. Ms. Hope commented it was difficult to predict how
long that would take; Councilmembers will determine their own process. She encouraged the Council to
move forward at a reasonable speed and suggested decisions be made by the end of July. The Council
agreed. Ms. Hope said she will communicate that date to the applicants.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 25, 2019
Page 20
Packet Pg. 289
Urban Forest
management plan
City Council meeting
June 25, 2019
Packet Pg. 290
History
Edmonds area was once largely forested
Trees removed by settlers F± loggers in late 1800s and early 1900s
As town grew up, new trees sprouted or were planted
► City government has maintained trees in ROWs and on City property
► City has code for tree cutting Et management on private property (esp. critical area's) but code
could use some updates
In 2016, Tree Board recommended adopting new code to require minimum # of trees on each
private property, along with arborist reviews F± permits for cutting trees on private property
► Council chose instead to have an Urban Forest Management Plan developed, which could gu
long-term tree management, especially on public property, and provide policy guidance,
including education Et incentives, for managing trees on private property
Packet Pg. 291
History (cont'd)
UFMP process began in 2017,
including:
Consultation with Tree Board
Consultation with Planning Board
Consultation with staff
Community outreach, such as:
Press releases
Open houses
► Survey
klCity website with UFMP info
Newsletter updates
Numerous meetings agendas
Tree Board
Planning Board
City Council
Public hearings (with notices)
Planning Board
City Council
UFMP Revisions made along the
way, including 3 draft versions:
July 2018
Nov 2018
May/June 2019
Packet Pg. 292
Comments on prior drafts
4 Categories of Complaints
. Wanting UFMP to set framework
for adopting more restrictions on
private property
Wanting UFMP to point up more
issues with trees (including
problems, not just benefits)
Wanting UFMP to have more local
information
Requesting various "clean-up" Et
technical corrections
Categories of agreement or
support
❑ Appreciation of improvements
❑ General support for Goals
❑ General support for recommended
actions
Packet Pg. 293
What was done between November 2018
Draft R May 2019 Draft
Informal committee formed in early 2019 to work on improvements
Changes made, including:
More attention to native trees
Re -write of Diseases Et Pests section
Removal of map Et references to specific tree planting "opportunity areas" (but still
encouraging planting)
► Modification of statements not backed by scientific findings for our region
More background discussion of tree issues
Additional information about City regulations for development
Additional information on selecting trees ("right tree, right place")
Additional information on trimming trees
Caveat about applicability of survey that had been done early in UFMP processs
Removal of references to specific dollar amounts represented by tree functions (but s_.__
recognizing value of trees in many way)
Packet Pg. 294
Contents of Current Draft Plan
Background, Edmonds
Context Et Purpose
Public process
Benefits Et Challenges of
Urban Forest
Tree Selection Factors
State Regulatory
Framework
City Planning Framework
Tree Canopy Cover
Information
Planting opportunities
Edmonds'
Practices
Urban Forest
Major Et Emerging Diseases
Et Pests
City Regulatory Framework
Regional Resources
Case Studies
Summary of Needs
Goals Et Actions
Packet Pg. 295
Overarching UFMP Goals
Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage
Manage public trees proactively
3. Incentivize protecting Et planting trees on private
property
Provide resources to community to educate/inform
on tree planting Et care
Promote "right tree, right place"
Packet Pg. 296
Goal 1: Maintain or enhance citywide
canopy coverage
Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts or
forest F± to consider changes to tree replacement requirements Et penalties for c
violations
Adopt policy of no net loss to overall
Ensure protection of tree resources in environmentally critical areas
Develop voluntary heritage tree program
Enforce City regulations on tree -cutting
Establish tree bank or fund to which donations can be made
Support sustainable ways to combat pests Et diseases
Consider need for dedicated City arborist
Report every 10 years on canopy coverage
Periodically update UFMP
Packet Pg. 297
Goal 2: Manage public trees proactively
Use best available science in caring for urban forest on City properties Et ROW
Have adequate resources (staff, contractual help, training, etc.) to monitor health of public
trees Et make decisions on their care
Develop Et maintain inventory of trees in key public places to document tree condition Et
risks
Update Street Tree Plan periodically
Support removal of invasive plants that threaten trees
F. Coordinate among departments on tree issues Et identify lead City staff person
G. Develop Et implement tree planting plan on City property Et ROW to ensure diversity Et
suitability
H. Implement program of regular maintenance for City trees
i. Lead or facilitate volunteer activities for tree planting/care on City property Et ROW
As part of City -sponsored capital projects, provide funding for appropriate trees in ROW Et
on City properties
Provide annual report City Council on tree management for City properties Et ROW
Packet Pg. 298
Goal 3: Incentivize protecting & planting
trees on private property
Have program of giving away trees Et/or tree vouchers for
use in Edmonds
B. For properties that retain certain amount of tree canopy
cover, explore establishment of incentives (with examples
named)
c. Develop certification/awards program to public recognize
property owners that maintain certain amount or type of
healthy trees
Packet Pg. 299
Goal 4: Provides resources to community to
educate/inform on tree planting Et care
Provide signage or other information about significant
public trees
B. Provide for Tree Board, esp. to: develop community
education materials; participate in or initiate tree
planting Et tree care activities; report annually on Tree
Board activities
c. Develop F±
disseminate
info
for public
on value of trees Et
to provide
guidance
on
tree
selection
F± management
Packet Pg. 300
Goal 5: Promote "Right tree, right
place"
Make readily available list of compatible trees in various kinds of settings
Identify key areas to increase canopy Et for private properties, encourage
appropriate tree planting or other techniques; for public property, act
appropriately plant trees or otherwise increase canopy
Identify Et plan for care of unsuitable trees a, as necessary, for pruning or
removal when they are potential damaging to people, buildings, or
infrastructure
D. Ensure that development
regulations require
native trees Et
vegetation to be
planted in critical areas,
esp. near streams Et
other wildlife
habitat areas
In updating Street Tree Plan, identify specific species of trees that should be
planted to be compatible with street environment
Packet Pg. 301
What will happen when UFMP is
adopted?
Implementation can get underway, including actions
identified for each goal, starting with most critical
activities
► Monitoring of UFMP goals Et actions can begin
UFMP can be re-evaluated in 5-10 years Et adjusted as
needed
Packet Pg. 302
Recommendation
► Adopt UFMP, either tonight or on Consent
Calendar
Packet Pg. 303
Questions,
Discussion ,
Action?
Packet Pg. 304
8.1.d
MEMO
6/28/19
To: Shane Hope & City Council
From: Diane Buckshnis
Thank you for the opportunity to check in with the Tree Board and Kernen. Scientist Ross
Dimmick was also there and has been very helpful while we all worked on this document.
1) Hire a full-time Arborist. The $20,000 in the current budget for an arborist at 20% of her
time is not sufficient. If the City is serious about managing our tree canopy and doing
the work and coordinating the program and/or strategies or goals that are or will be
developed.
2) Obtain a current GIS and have a GIS done every five years. The last GIS was performed
in 2015 and tree canopy was about 30% and we all know that our tree canopy has
declined since then or has it? So, a current GIS will allow the City Council to have a
current view and the Tree Board, et, al opines that City Council should think about
enhancing, increasing and maintaining a 30% tree canopy. Seattle has as its goal to
increase to 30% and they have the same land and water issues that we have. If you
want to know about other cities, ask Bill Phipps as he read a lot of UFMPs and he said
that Everett has one of the better UFMP.
3) Consider districting or quadrants for tree canopy as incentives and codes should address
the issue of views and non -view properties. We must educate folks, especially
developers, that our BIG trees are healthy and good for the environment. The tree
board has offered to help with this strategy of separating into quadrants if the Council
would like to task them with that work.
4) Start immediately on code crafting especially for developments as well as private
homes. For example, in Shoreline a developer must keep at least 20% significant trees
on its plat and so codes need to be written to address the low impact development
aspect that Shane brought forth to Council many years ago. Also, in Shoreline, private
residences can only remove three trees per year and permitting occurs but no fees are
charged - the permits just help with tracking the tree canopy. This caveat has to do with
tracking and folks should still be financially penalized for cutting trees down without a
permit or cutting trees in sensitive critical areas.
Packet Pg. 305
8.1.d
5) Start working on a "voucher program" for developers so that they will have to help pay
for all the trees that they are removing from these short plats and plats. Create a ratio:
remove a tree --plant two or three trees --and ensure there is diversity in the tree
selections.
6) Immediately begin working on incentives for people to retain trees that follow our
"Right Tree Right Place" motto; and the Tree Board is committed to continuing the
educational aspect.
7) Create a tree bank location which hopefully could be within the City. WRIA 8 funded a
"tree bank" concept in Redmond last year and then Mountain to Sound Trust created
the "Million Tree Program" during the last grant round that we funded. Our full-time
arborist could work on issues like this for the City and since the City includes both
Meadowdale and SW County Park in our tree canopy, can we "bank some trees there?"
8) Let's be proactive and start planting Street Trees and think about diversity. Our Tree
Board Members Gail Lovell and Barbara Chase have been tasked to work on this along
with Rich Lindsay and Debra Dill.
9) Lastly, the Tree Board is committed to continuing to educate people and working closely
with Staff to make this document workable and we hope that the City can show
commitment by creating a full-time arborist position so that the City can engage with
other regional support and conservation groups and illustrate that the City does take its
tree canopy seriously. Let's create ways to ensure that our declining tree canopy is
restored and maintained and enhanced.
Thank you Council for allowing the Tree Board to provide these suggestions; we are all
committed to our mission of "Right Tree Right Place." Special thanks to Tree Board Members
and Ross for working on this document as we all know volunteering is a special gift you are
giving the City. Kernen needs a special thanks, too for working and finalizing this document for
US.
Packet Pg. 306
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Second Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Marissa Cain
Background/History
Amend the 2019 Budget Ordinance No. 4148
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council forward the Second Quarter 2019 Budget Amendment to full Council for
presentation and approval of Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2019 Budget.
Narrative
There is a total of 16 budget amendments. Fourteen of the amendments are new items for Council and
two have been previously discussed by Council.
Summary of Cash Impacts
Packet Pg. 307
8.2
Cash (Increase)
Page #
Description
Decrease
General Fund 001
1
Records Storage/Transfer Project
$7,000
2
GovQA Software Enhancements
$5,100
3
Citizen's Housing Commission
$0
4
Expert Witnesses
$50,000
5
hiterfund Transfer - Close Fund Olt
($931,523)
6
Interfund Transfer - RCW Limitations
($3,835,827)
11
Yost Pool Shower Boiler
$10,494
Impacts to Ending Cash
($4,694,756)
Risk Management Reserve Subfund 011
5
hiterfund Transfer - Close Fund Olt
$931,523
Impacts to Ending Cash
$931,523
Contingency Reserve Subfund 012
6
Interfund Transfer - RCW Limitations
$3,835,827
Impacts to Ending Cash
$3,835,827
Historic Preservation Fund 014
7
Edmonds Historic Calendar
$5,800
Impacts to Ending Cash
$5,800
Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund 018
8
Professional Services
$1,862
Impacts to Ending Cash
$1,862
Municipal Arts Fund 117
14
174th & 71st Stormhnprovements Project Transfer
($1,737)
Impacts to Ending Cash
($1,737)
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 120
9
WA State Visitor's Guide Advertisement
$0
10
Paine Field Terminal Advertisement
$5,000
Impacts to Ending Cash
$5,000
Summary of Cash Impacts
Packet Pg. 308
8.2
Cash (Increase)
Page #
Description
Decrease
REET 2 - Fund 125
11
Yost Pool Shower Boiler
$0
15
Gateway Sign
$10,000
Impacts to Ending Cash
$10,000
Gifts Catalog Fund 127
12
Yost Pool Clock
$0
13
Seaview Park Picnic Table & Benches
$0
Impacts to Ending Cash
$0
Storm Fund 422
14
174th & 71st Storm Improvements Project Transfer
$1,737
Impacts to Ending Cash
$1,737
Fireman's Pension 617
16
LEOFF 1 Fire Fund Settlement Agreement
$58,596
Impacts to Ending Cash
$58,596
Total of Impact toFnding Cash
$ 153,852
Attachments:
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance
2019 2nd Quarter Budget Amendment Exhibits
Packet Pg. 309
8.2.a
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4148 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers
and increases in appropriations; and
WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is
transferred from one fund to another; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and
information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal
funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2019 Budget;
and
THEREFORE,
WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4148 amending the budget for the fiscal
year 2019 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, and D adopted
herein by reference.
1
Packet Pg. 310
8.2.a
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, DAVE EARLING
2
Packet Pg. 311
8.2.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 4148 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND
EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2019.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
3
Packet Pg. 312
8.2.a
EXHIBIT "A": Budget Amendment Summary (July 2019)
FUND
NO.
FUND
DESCRIPTION
2019
BEGINNING
FUND BALANCE
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
2019
ENDING
FUND BALANCE
001
GENERAL FUND
9,291,591
45,633,544
45,369,117
9,556,018
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
411,643
437,980
466,920
382,703
011
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND
927,490
28,210
931,523
24,177
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
5,476,192
182,400
3,835,827
1,822,765
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
7,177
5,230
11,200
1,207
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
210,281
-
-
210,281
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
300,000
556,800
-
856,800
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
250,000
-
1,862
248,138
019
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND
250,000
-
200,000
50,000
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
56,399
165,430
45,800
176,029
111
STREET FUND
1,138,323
1,859,270
2,252,028
745,565
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/I MPROVE
723,715
7,139,933
6,892,395
971,253
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
557,234
152,647
181,880
528,001
118
MEMORIAL STREETTREE
18,870
580
-
19,450
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
80,267
98,264
108,934
69,597
121
EMPLOYEE PARKI NG PERMIT FUND
68,533
26,170
26,880
67,823
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
14,298
1,680
3,000
12,978
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
61,226
31,250
32,000
60,476
125
PARK ACC/IMPROVEMENT
2,065,983
1,597,600
3,383,286
280,297
126
SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND
2,828,355
1,604,020
3,872,301
560,074
127
G I FTS CATALOG F U N D
261,527
97,800
109,454
249,873
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV
158,854
182,560
194,707
146,707
136
PARKSTRUST FUND
159,966
4,870
5,000
159,836
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUSTFD
979,764
44,500
-
1,024,264
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
7,319
10,240
10,500
7,059
211
LID FUND CONTROL
-
12,400
12,400
-
231
2012 LTGO DEBTSERVICE FUND
-
716,420
716,410
10
332
PARKS CONSTRUCTION
2,889,448
2,885,649
3,997,428
1,777,669
421
WATER
17,148,411
10,473,626
12,938,995
14,683,042
422
STORM
10,779,980
5,461,148
10,019,772
6,221,356
423
SEWER/TREATMENT PLANT
43,127,578
14,386,296
17,721,484
39,792,390
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
843,981
1,995,280
1,991,210
848,051
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
9,321,419
1,763,760
2,933,431
8,151,748
512
Technology Rental Fund
326,630
1,101,798
1,179,911
248,517
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
222,323
72,040
137,223
157,140
Totals
110,964,777
98,729,395
119,582,878
90,111,294
r
Q
Packet Pg. 313
8.2.a
EXHIBIT "B": Budget Amendments by Revenue (July 2019)
FUND
NO.
FUND
DESCRIPTION
Adopted
Budget
Ord. #4136
1/1/2019
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4144
2/20/2019
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4148
4/24/2019
Proposed
Amendment
Ord. #
712019
2019
Amended
Revenue
Budget
001
General Fund
$ 40,774,939
$
$ 91,255
$4,767,350
$ 45,633,544
009
Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
437,980
-
437,980
011
Risk Management Reserve Fund
28,210
28,210
012
Contingency Reserve Fund
182,400
182,400
014
Historic Preservation Gift Fund
5,230
5,230
016
Building Maintenance Fund
-
-
017
Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund
556,800
556,800
018
Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund
-
-
019
Edmonds Opioid Response Fund
-
-
104
Drug Enforcement Fund
165,430
165,430
111
Street Fund
1,859,270
-
1,859,270
112
Combined Street Const/Improve
6,646,917
295,366
197,650
7,139,933
117
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
150,910
-
-
1,737
152,647
118
Memorial Street Tree
580
-
580
120
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
94,730
3,534
98,264
121
Employee Pa rking Permit Fund
26,170
-
26,170
122
Youth Scholarship Fund
1,680
1,680
123
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
31,250
31,250
125
ParkAcq/Improvement
1,597,600
1,597,600
126
Special Capital Fund
1,604,020
1,604,020
127
Gifts Catalog Fund
82,100
6,000
9,700
97,800
130
Cemetery Maintenance/Improv
182,560
-
-
182,560
136
Parks Trust Fund
4,870
4,870
137
Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd
44,500
44,500
138
Sister City Commission
10,240
10,240
211
Lid Fund Control
12,400
12,400
231
2012 LTGO Debt Service fund
716,420
-
716,420
332
Parks Construction
2,796,849
88,800
2,885,649
421
Water
10,473,626
-
10,473,626
422
Storm
5,461,148
5,461,148
423
Sewer/Treatment Plant
14,386,296
14,386,296
424
Bond Reserve Fund
1,995,280
1,995,280
511
Equipment Rental Fund
1,763,760
1,763,760
512
Technology Renta I Fund
1,101,798
1,101,798
617
Firemen's Pension Fund
72,040
72,040
Totals
$93,268,003
1 $ 384,166
1 $ 294,905
1 $4,782,321
1 $98,729,395
r
Q
Packet Pg. 314
8.2.a
EXHIBIT "C: Budget Amendments by Expenditure (July 2019)
FUND
NO.
FUND
DESCRIPTION
Adopted
Budget
Ord. #4136
1/1/2019
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4144
2/20/2019
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4148
4/24/2019
Proposed
Amendment
Ord. #
712019
2019
Amended
Expenditure
Budget
001
General Fund
$ 44,364,843
$ 707,366
$ 224,314
$ 72,594
$ 45,369,117
009
Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
444,270
-
22,650
-
466,920
011
Risk Management Reserve Fund
-
-
931,523
931,523
012
Contingency Reserve Fund
-
3,835,827
3,835,827
014
Historic Preservation Gift Fund
5,400
5,800
11,200
016
Building Maintenance Fund
-
-
-
017
Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund
-
-
018
Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund
-
1,862
1,862
019
Edmonds Opioid Response Fund
200,000
-
200,000
104
Drug Enforcement Fund
45,800
45,800
111
Street Fund
2,234,528
-
17,500
2,252,028
112
Combined Street Const/Improve
6,399,379
295,366
197,650
6,892,395
117
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
181,880
-
-
181,880
118
Memorial Street Tree
-
-
120
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
100,400
8,534
108,934
121
Employee Parking Permit Fund
26,880
-
26,880
122
Youth Scholarship Fund
3,000
3,000
123
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
32,000
-
-
-
32,000
125
ParkAcq/Improvement
2,853,560
465,356
54,370
10,000
3,383,286
126
Special Capital Fund
3,102,850
761,851
7,600
-
3,872,301
127
Gifts Catalog Fund
77,795
-
21,959
9,700
109,454
130
Cemetery Maintenance/Improv
184,707
10,000
-
-
194,707
136
Parks Trust Fund
5,000
-
5,000
137
Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd
-
-
138
Sister City Commission
10,500
10,500
211
Lid Fund Control
12,400
12,400
231
2012LTGO Debt Service Fund
716,410
-
716,410
332
Parks Construction
3,763,628
233,800
-
3,997,428
421
Water
12,229,053
679,942
30,000
12,938,995
422
Storm
9,690,422
304,613
23,000
1,737
10,019,772
423
Sewer/Treatment Plant
17,259,438
462,046
-
-
17,721,484
424
Bond Reserve Fund
1,991,210
-
-
1,991,210
511
Equipment Rental Fund
2,408,431
296,000
229,000
2,933,431
512
Technology Renta I Fund
1,048,911
131,000
-
1,179,911
617
Firemen's Pension Fund
78,627
58,596
137,223
Totals
$109,471,322
$ 4,347,340
1 $ 828,043
1 $4,936,173
$119,582,878
r
Q
Packet Pg. 315
EXHIBIT "D": Budget Amendment Summary (July 2019)
8.2.a
Fund Number
Proposed
Amendment
Change in
Beginning Fund
Balance
Proposed
Amendment
Change in
Revenue
Proposed
Amendment
Change in
Expense
Proposed
Amendment
Change in Ending
Fund Balance
001
4,767,350
72,594
4,694,756
011
-
931,523
(931,523)
012
3,835,827
(3,835,827)
014
5,800
(5,800)
018
-
1,862
(1,862)
117
1,737
-
1,737
120
3,534
8,534
(5,000)
125
-
10,000
(10,000)
127
9,700
9,700
422
-
1,737
(1,737)
617
-
58,596
(58,596)
Total Change
4,782,321
4,936,173
(153,852)
C
N
E
C
d
E
Q
r
N
7
m
M
V-
O
N
L
N
L
CY
O
V
N
L
0
d
E
d
E
Q
m
L
L
CY
N
C
N
>_
t
V
R
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 316
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: This decision package would return custody to the City Clerk's Office of 172 boxes of
legal/litigation records kept in an offsite storage facility (Access Corp). This package
includes costs for new storage shelving, contract dissolution/permanent removal
from vendor storage site, and transfer to City Hall. By keeping these records on -site
at City Hall, the City will have full control over its records, allowing staff to
conveniently access the records as well as review/parse for disposition and
destruction per the State Records Retention Schedule. Also, the City will no longer
pay monthly stora a or file box delivery fees.
Department: City Clerk's Office
Division: Mayor's Office Fund
001 GENERAL
Title: Records Storage/Transfer Project Name:
Preparer: Scott Passey
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.25.514.30.35.00
Small Equipment
$ 2,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Professional Services
5,000
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 7,000
1 $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
GF Ending Fund Balance
$ 7,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 7,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Packet Pg. 317
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: This amendment would constitute a service enhancement to our existing GovQA
Records Request System agreement. The additional services would include 3
software licenses for built-in records redaction tools, and OCR (Optical Character
Recognition) capability for all documents housed within the records portal. This will
facilitate the process and speed the timeline for providing redacted records, as well
as create search functionality for all Admin users.
Department: Mayor's Office
Division: City Clerk's Office Fund
001 GENERAL
Title: Public Records Request Software Enhancements Name:
Preparers 1 Scott Passey, City Clerk
Budget Amendment Type I New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 1100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? On -Going
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
Professional Services
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 5,100
1 $ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
GF Ending Fund Balance
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ (5,100
$ 5,100
$ (5,100
Packet Pg. 318
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Resolution #1427 established the Citizens' Housing Commission to serve through
2020. For the project, the City Council approved of funding several items from
Council continency funds, namely: postcard mailing ($7,621, expended) and
professional services (possibly including new part-time staff assistance) at $86,115.
The latter amount would be used for meeting facilitation ($28,000, estimated), other
community engagement ($52,115, estimated), and videotaping ($6,000 esimated).
NOTE: A budget amendment may later be requested to use a portion of the
professional services fundin2 for tem orar art -time staff assistance.
Department: Development Services
Division: Development Services Administration Fund 001 GENERAL
Title: Citizens' Housing Commission Expenses Name:
Preparer: Diane Cunningham
Budget Amendment Type ew Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? 3-19-19; 5-21-19; and 6-4-19
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? 10perating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.62.524.10.41.40
Communication
$ 7,621
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
Professional Services
$ 86,115
-
-
-
-
001.000.11.511.60.49.10
Council Conti enc
93,736
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
S -
S -
S -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
S -
S -
$ -
S -
S -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S -
S -
$ -
S -
S -
Packet Pg. 319
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: This decision package is to hire expert witnesses for the Ebbtide walkway litigation
and SEPA appeal processes. Witnesses needed in this litigation include experts in
surveying, fisheries, design, safety, and permitting.
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Division: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Fund 001 GENERAL
Title: Expert Witnesses Name:
Preparer: Carrie Hite
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.64.571.21.41.00
Professional Services
$ 50,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 50,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 50,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 50,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Packet Pg. 320
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Per newly adopted Fund Balance Policy, and as discussed in Finance Committee
meetings and Council Meetings several times, this budget amendment is to transfer
the cash in the Risk Management Fund 011 to the General Fund, in preparation to
close fund 011.
Department: Administrative Services
Division: Finance 011 RISK
Fund MANAGEMENT
Title: Transfer money out of Risk Fund to GF Name: RESERVE
Preparer: Dave Turley
Budget Amendment Type I New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? I 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? 10perating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
011.000.39.597.19.55.01
Interfund Transfer
$ 931,523
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 931,523
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.397.19.011.00
Interfund Transfer
$ 931,523
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 931,523
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
011.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 931,523
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
931,523
-
-
-
-
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Packet Pg. 321
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description:
Per newly adopted Fund Balance Policy, and as discussed in Finance Committee
meetings and Council Meetings several times, this budget amendment is to reduce the
amount in the Contingency Reserve fund so that the fund balance does not exceed
RCW limitations or City Fund Balance/Reserve Policy.
Department:
Administrative Services
Fund
Name:
012 CONTINGENCY
RESERVE
Division:
Finance
Title:
Transfer money out of Contingency Fund to GF
Preparer:
Dave Turley
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
012.000.39.597.14.55.00
Interfund Transfer
$ 3,835,827
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 3,835,827
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.397.14.012.00
Interfund Transfer
$ 3,835,827
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 3,835,827
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
012.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ (3,835,827)
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
3,835,827
-
-
-
-
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Packet Pg. 322
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Historic Preservation Fund. Budget amendment reflecting the fact that the bill for
printing the 2019 Edmonds Historic Calendar was received late and was paid in
January using 2019 funds. This means that payment in 2019 will be for two calendar
printings rather than one. Because the 2019 version of the calendar was budgeted as
a 2018 expenditure, there is currently sufficient money in the fund balance to
support the amendment. The amendment also reflects the slight increase in costs for
printing.
Department: Development Services
Division: Planning / Historic Preservation Fund 014 HISTORIC
Title: Adjustment for Historic Calendar Printing Name: PRESERVATION GIFT
Preuarer: Rob Chave
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
014.000.62.557.20.49.00
Edmonds Historic Calendar
$ 5,800
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 5,800
1 $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
014.000.62.508.90.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 5,800
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 5,800
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Packet Pg. 323
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
8.2.b
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: I Final research to complete Kone Consulting Homelessness Report.
Council
Division:
Title: Decision _
Preparer: Maureen
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
on Homelessness
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Fund I
018 HOMELESSNESS
Name: RESPONSE FUND
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
018.000.39.565.40.41.00
Professional Services
$ 1,862
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 1,862
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
018.000.39.508.40.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 1,862
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ (1,862
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
8
Packet Pg. 324
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Reimbursement to 120 Fund for joint tourism promotion ad purchased in the WA
State Visitor's Guide. Partnered with Puget Sound Express, Best Western Harbor
Inn, and Cascadia Art Museum. The total ad was $6,535 and we have received
reimbursement totaling $3,534 which needs to be added back into the 120 fund
advertising budget.
Department: Community Services/ Economic Development
Division: Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 120 HOTEL/MOTEL
Title: Reimbursement of funds to 120 Name: TAX REVENUE
Preparer: Cindi Cruz
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Self Funded
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? 10perating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
Advertising Reimbursement
$ 3,534
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 3,534
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
120.000.369.91.000.00
Miscellaneous Revenue
$ 3,534
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 3,534
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Packet Pg. 325
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Budget amendment to take advantage of an advertising opportunity in a publication
being produced for the new Paine Field terminal. This will also include an article on
Edmonds. The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, on June 20, 2019, voted to
approve an expenditure up to $5,000 out of the fund balance of the 120 fund to
purchase a full page ad as a companion to the article on Edmonds.
Department: Community Services/ Economic Development
Division: Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 120 HOTEL/MOTEL
Title: Paine Field Terminal Advertisement Name: TAX REVENUE
Preparer: Cindi Cruz
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? 10perating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
120.000.31.575.42.41.40
Advertisement
$ 5,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 5,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
120.000.31.508.30.00.00
$ 5,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 5,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
10
Packet Pg. 326
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: The shower boiler at Yost Pool stopped working on May 21st and it was determined
the boiler was beyond repair. Requesting emergency budget authority for the
removal, and installation of a new shower boiler. To offset this expense we propose
removing the Mathay Ballinger Trail Improvement Project this year which will
leave an ending fund balance impact of $10,493 in the general fund.
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Division: Recreation Fund
125 REET 2
Title: Yost Pool Shower Boiler Name:
Preparer: Shannon Burley
Budget Amendment Type I New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? Partially Funded
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Capital
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Yost Pool Boiler
$ 20,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Mathay Ballinger Trail
20,000
-
-
-
-
001.000.64.594.76.65.00
Yost Pool Boiler
10,494
-
-
-
-
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
$ 10,494
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 10,494
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 10,494
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
11
Packet Pg. 327
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: There is a community initiative to raise funds and purchase a memorial clock in
honor of a citizen who frequented the pool. Requesting expenditure authority to
purchase the clock and have it installed once the funds have been raised. This will
not impact the fund balance of the gifts catalog.
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Division: Recreation Fund
127 GIFTS CATALOG
Title: Yost Pool Clock Name:
Preparer: Shannon Burley
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Self Funded
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
127.000.64.575.50.31.00
Supplies
$ 1,200
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 1,200
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
127.000.367.00.000.00
Private Contributions
$ 1,200
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 1,200
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
12
Packet Pg. 328
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Requesting expenditure authority to purchase new benches and picnic table at
Seaview Park, expense off -set by memorial gifts catalog program (private citizens
memorializing the benches and picnic table). This expense will not impact the fund
balance of the gifts catalog
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Division: Recreation Fund
127 GIFTS CATALOG
Title: Seaview Park Benches & Picnic Table Name:
Preparer: Shannon Burley
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Self Funded
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
127.000.64.575.50.31.00
Supplies
$ 8,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 8,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
127.000.367.00.000.00
Private Contributions
$ 8,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 8,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
13
Packet Pg. 329
8.2.b
New Items for Council to Consider (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: 1% for the Arts transfer to account for new storm pipe and appurtenances that were
constructed as part of the 174th & 71st Storm Improvements Project. (E8FB/c521)
Department: Public Works
Division: Engineering Fund
422 STORM
Title: 1% for the Arts (174th & 71st Storm Impr.) Name:
Preparer: Michele (Mike) De Lilla
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? ICapital
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
422.000.72.597.73.55.17
Interfund Transfer
$ 1,737
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 1,737
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
117.200.397.73.411.00
$ 1,737
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 1,737
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
422.000.72.508.00.00.00
Ending Cash
$ 1,737
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
117.200.64.508.40.00.00
Ending Cash
1,737
-
-
-
-
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
14
Packet Pg. 330
8.2.b
Previously Discussed by Council (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Additional budget for final design specifications and fabrication of new Gateway
Sign at 5th Ave S and SR 104 approved by City Council on May 7, 2019.
Department: Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Division: Recreation Fund
125 REET 2
Title: Gateway Sign - Project #M113.re Name:
Preparer: Frances Chapin
Budget Amendment Type Previously Approved Budget By Council
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? May 7 2019
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? ICapital
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
125.000.64.594.76.65.41
Gateway Sin
$ 10,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 10,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
125.000.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 10,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 10,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
15
Packet Pg. 331
8.2.b
Previously Discussed by Council (July 2019)
Budget Amendment for: Second Quarter
Item Description: Add funds to the LEOFF 1 Fire fund reimbursement BARS in the amount of $58,596
for the Barnard (LEOFF 1 Fire Pensioner) settlement agreement approved by
Council.
Department: Human Resources
Division: Human Resources Fund 617 FIREMEN'S
Title: LEOFF 1 Fire fund Name: PENSION
Preparer: Mary Ann Hardie
Budget Amendment Type Previously Approved Budget By Council
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval? Agreement approved at the 6/25/19 Council meeting
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
617.000.51.517.20.23.00
LEOFF 1 - Fire
$ 58,596
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 58,596
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
617.000.51.508.00.00.00
LEOFF 1 - Fire
$ 58,596
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 58,596
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
16
Packet Pg. 332
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
Civic Park Financing Ordinance
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Scott James
Background/History
On July 2, 2019, Council voted to issue $3.7 million of bonds to fund the Civic Park construction "gap"
and authorized the Mayor to sign letters of engagement to retain Foster Pepper to serve as Bond
Counsel and Northwest Municipal Advisors to serve as financial advisor on this bond issuance.
The Civic Park project only became a reality after a very robust public process during the development
of the Civic Park Master Plan, which was officially adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan in late 2017.
Subsequently, the City authorized a contract for design services with Walker Macy to complete the
design development, permitting, bidding, and construction support.
Since this award of bid, Walker Macy has been engaged in our community with various stakeholders to
complete the schematic design and begin the design development process. Stakeholders included the
original Project Advisory Committee, a skate park focus group, the Petanque club, the Chamber of
Commerce, the Arts Festival Foundation, the Arts Commission, the Boys and Girls club, Sno-King Youth
organization, among others. Walker Macy has used this input to inform the beginning of their design.
Council / City Action to Date include:
On June 12, staff presented the Council Finance Committee with bond financing options that included
20, 25 and 30 year bond terms and discussed the issuance of a Bond Anticipation Note or BAN. Briefly, a
BAN is a short-term loan issued in advance of a future bond issue, and is repaid from the bonds
proceeds.
On June 4, 2019, staff presented Council with financing options to fund the "Gap", between revenues
obtained to help pay for Civic Park and the anticipated expenses to construct the park.
In April 2019 Council received an update of the design process.
In November 2018, Council adopted both the CIP and CFP that identified Civic as a project, with a goal to
begin construction in 2020.
In May 2018, Council adopted resolutions to authorize grant submittals to the State Recreation and
Conservation office for funding for Civic.
In April 2018, Council authorized the full design contract for Civic to Walker Macy.
In April 2018, Council approved the closeout for the removal of Civic stadium.
In 2017, the City contracted with Walker Macy to complete the demolition plans for the stadium.
In 2017, the City contracted with Walker Macy to complete the geo technical work and survey work, for
both the sewer line replacement and for park planning purposes.
After a robust public process, Council adopted the Civic Master Plan in March 2017.
Council kicked off the master planning of Civic with a special meeting in May 2016.
Council awarded the contract to Walker Macy in May of 2016.
Packet Pg. 333
8.3
The City published an RFQ/SOQ on February 121h, 2016 for firms to submit their qualifications for all
three phases of Civic Park Master Plan and Development.
The PROS plan and Parks CIP have both identified the City's goals of master planning and developing this
property once acquired.
Civic Center Field was acquired by the City from the Edmonds School District on February 9, 2016.
Staff Recommendation
Council make the following motion: Motion to approve the 2019 Limited Tax General Obligation Bond
Ordinance No. XXXX.
Narrative
Tonight's Civic Park bond issuance presentation will include remarks from the City's Financial Advisor,
Scott Bauer of Northwest Municipal Advisors and Bond Counsel, Nancy Neraas of Foster Pepper. The
presentation will include:
1. An overview of the Bond Market
2. An overview of the City's Debt Profile
3. Plan of Finance
4. Delegation of Authority
5. Bond Issuance Schedule of Events
6. Respond to Council questions
Attachment includes:
1. Proposed 2019 Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Ordinance No. XXXX
Attachments:
53432757-v3_Bond Ordinance_City of Edmonds_LTGO Bonds 2019 (2)
Civic Park Bond Presentation July 16 2019
Packet Pg. 334
8.3.a
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Edmonds, Washington, relating to
contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance, sale and delivery of not to
exceed $4,000,000 aggregate principal amount of limited tax general obligation
bonds to provide funds to finance improvements to Civic Park and to pay the costs
of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to
certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City's designated
representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing
for other related matters.
Passed July 16, 2019
This document prepared by:
Foster Pepper PLLC
1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3000
Seattle, Washington 98101
(206) 447-4400
51351725.E Packet Pg. 335
8.3.a
TABLE OF CONTENTS*
Page
Section1 .
Definitions............................................................................................................... 1
Section 2 .
Findings and Determinations..................................................................................
4
Section 3 .
Authorization of Bonds...........................................................................................
4
Section 4 .
Description of the Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative .................
4
Section 5 .
Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds ..............................................
5
Section 6 .
Form and Execution of Bonds................................................................................
6
Section7 .
Payment of Bonds...................................................................................................
6
Section 8 .
Funds and Accounts; Deposit of Proceeds..............................................................
6
Section 9 .
Redemption Provisions and Purchase of Bonds .....................................................
7
Section 10 .
Failure To Pay Bonds..............................................................................................
8
Section11 .
Pledge of Taxes.......................................................................................................
8
Section 12 .
Tax Covenants; Designation of Bonds as "Qualified Tax Exempt
Obligations."...........................................................................................................
9
Section 13 .
Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds..................................................................
9
Section 14 .
Sale and Delivery of the Bonds............................................................................
10
Section 15 .
Official Statement; Continuing Disclosure...........................................................
1 1
Section 16 .
Supplemental and Amendatory Ordinances..........................................................
11
Section 17 .
General Authorization and Ratification................................................................
11
Section18 .
Severability...........................................................................................................
12
Section 19 .
Effective Date of Ordinance.................................................................................
12
Exhibit A Parameters for Final Terms
Exhibit B Form of Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure
*The coverpage, table of contents and section headings of this ordinance are for convenience of reference only, and
shall not be used to resolve any question of interpretation of this ordinance.
-1-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 336
8.3.a
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Edmonds, Washington, relating to
contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance, sale and delivery of not to
exceed $4,000,000 aggregate principal amount of limited tax general obligation
bonds to provide funds to finance improvements to Civic Park and to pay the costs
of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain
terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City's designated representative
to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related
matters.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the following capitalized terms shall
have the following meanings:
(a) "Authorized Denomination" means $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof within
a maturity of a Series.
(b) "Beneficial Owner" means, with respect to a Bond, the owner of any beneficial
interest in that Bond.
(c) "Bond" means each bond issued pursuant to and for the purposes provided in this
ordinance.
(d) "Bond Counsel" means the firm of Foster Pepper PLLC, its successor, or any other
attorney or firm of attorneys selected by the City with a nationally recognized standing as bond
counsel in the field of municipal finance.
(e) "Bond Fund" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Fund, 2019, of the
City created for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
(f) "Bond Purchase Contract" means an offer to purchase a Series of the Bonds, setting
forth certain terms and conditions of the issuance, sale and delivery of those Bonds, which offer is
authorized to be accepted by the Designated Representative on behalf of the City, if consistent
with this ordinance. In the case of a competitive sale, the official notice of sale, the Purchaser's
bid and the award by the City shall constitute the Bond Purchase Contract for purposes of this
ordinance.
(g) "Bond Register" means the books or records maintained by the Bond Registrar for
the purpose of identifying ownership of each Bond.
(h) "Bond Registrar" means the Fiscal Agent, or any successor bond registrar selected
by the City.
-1-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 337
8.3.a
(i) "City" means the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the State.
0) "City Council" means the legislative authority of the City, as duly and regularly
constituted from time to time.
(k) "Code" means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(1) "DTC"' means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, or its
nominee.
(m) "Designated Representative" means the officer of the City appointed in Section 4
of this ordinance to serve as the City's designated representative in accordance with RCW
39.46.040(2).
(n) "Final Terms" means the terms and conditions for the sale of a Series of the Bonds
including the amount, date or dates, denominations, interest rate or rates (or mechanism for
determining interest rate or rates), payment dates, final maturity, redemption rights, price, and
other terms or covenants.
(o) "Finance Director' means the Finance Director or such other officer of the City
who succeeds to substantially all of the responsibilities of that office.
(p) "Fiscal Agent" means the fiscal agent of the State, as the same may be designated
by the State from time to time.
(q) "Government Obligations" has the meaning given in RCW 39.53.010, as now in
effect or as may hereafter be amended.
(r) "Issue Date" means, with respect to a Bond, the date of initial issuance and delivery
of that Bond to the Purchaser in exchange for the purchase price of that Bond.
(s) "Letter of Representations" means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations
between the City and DTC, dated August 6, 1996, as it may be amended from time to time, and
any successor or substitute letter relating to the operational procedures of the Securities
Depository.
(t) "MSRB" means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board.
(u) "Official Statement" means an offering document, disclosure document, private
placement memorandum or substantially similar disclosure document provided to purchasers and
potential purchasers in connection with the initial offering of a Series of the Bonds in conformance
with Rule 15c2-12 or other applicable regulations of the SEC.
(v) "Owner" means, without distinction, the Registered Owner and the Beneficial
Owner.
-2-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 338
8.3.a
(w) "Project" means financing improvements to Civic Park, and other capital purposes,
as deemed necessary and advisable by the City. Incidental costs incurred in connection with
carrying out and accomplishing the Project, consistent with RCW 39.46.070, may be included as
costs of the Project.
(x) "Project Fund" means the fund or account of the City designated or created by the
Finance Director for the purpose of carrying out the Project.
(y) "Purchaser" means the corporation, firm, association, partnership, trust, bank,
financial institution or other legal entity or group of entities selected by the Designated
Representative to serve as purchaser in a private placement, underwriter or placement agent in a
negotiated sale or awarded as the successful bidder in a competitive sale of any Series of the Bonds.
(z) "Rating Agency" means any nationally recognized rating agency then maintaining
a rating on the Bonds at the request of the City.
(aa) "Record Date" means the Bond Registrar's close of business on the 15th day of the
month preceding an interest payment date. With respect to redemption of a Bond prior to its
maturity, the Record Date shall mean the Bond Registrar's close of business on the date on which
the Bond Registrar sends the notice of redemption in accordance with Section 9.
(bb) "Registered Owner" means, with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name that
Bond is registered on the Bond Register. For so long as the City utilizes the book -entry only
system for the Bonds under the Letter of Representations, Registered Owner shall mean the
Securities Depository.
(cc) "Rule 15c2-12" means Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(dd) "SEC"' means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
(ee) "Securities Depository" means DTC, any successor thereto, any substitute
securities depository selected by the City that is qualified under applicable laws and regulations to
provide the services proposed to be provided by it, or the nominee of any of the foregoing.
(ff) "Series of the Bonds" or "Series" means a series of the Bonds issued pursuant to
this ordinance.
(gg) "State" means the State of Washington.
(hh) "System of Registration" means the system of registration for the City's bonds and
other obligations set forth in Ordinance No. 2451 of the City.
(ii) "Term Bond" means each Bond designated as a Term Bond and subject to
mandatory redemption in the years and amounts set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract.
0j) "Undertaking" means the undertaking to provide continuing disclosure entered into
pursuant to Section 15 of this ordinance.
-3-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 339
8.3.a
Section 2. Findings and Determinations. The City takes note of the following facts
and makes the following findings and determinations:
(a) Authority and Description of Project. The City is in need of certain improvements
to Civic Park. The City Council therefore finds that it is in the best interests of the City to carry
out the Project.
(b) Plan of Financing. Pursuant to applicable law, including without limitation
chapters 35.37, 35.40, 39.36, 39.44, 39.46 and 39.52 RCW, the City is authorized to issue general
obligation bonds for the purpose of financing the Project. The total expected cost of the Project is
approximately $12,385,400, which is expected to be made up of proceeds of the Bonds, grants,
contributions and other available money of the City.
(c) Debt Capacity. The maximum amount of indebtedness authorized by this
ordinance is $4,000,000. Based on the following facts, this amount is to be issued within the
amount permitted to be issued by the City for general municipal purposes without a vote:
(1) The assessed valuation of the taxable property within the City as ascertained
by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for collection in the
calendar year 2019 is $10,223,133,972.
(2) As of July 1, 2019, the City had limited tax general obligation indebtedness,
consisting of bonds and loans outstanding in the principal amount of
$7,789,453, which is incurred within the limit of up to 11/2% of the value of
the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal
purposes without a vote.
(3) As of July 1, 2019, the City had no outstanding unlimited tax general
obligation indebtedness.
(d) The Bonds. For the purpose of providing the funds necessary to carry out the
Project and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the Bonds, the City Council finds that it is in
the best interests of the City and its taxpayers to issue and sell the Bonds to the Purchaser, pursuant
to the terms set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract as approved by the City's Designated
Representative consistent with this ordinance.
Section 3. Authorization of Bonds. The City is authorized to borrow money on the
credit of the City and issue negotiable limited tax general obligation bonds evidencing
indebtedness in one or more Series in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,000,000 to
provide funds necessary to carry out the Project and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the
Bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds allocated to paying the cost of the Project shall be deposited as
set forth in Section 8 of this ordinance and shall be used to carry out the Project, or a portion of
the Project, in such order of time as the City determines is advisable and practicable.
Section 4. Description of the Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative. The a
Finance Director, or the Assistant Finance Director in his absence, is appointed as the Designated
Representative of the City and is authorized and directed to conduct the sale of the Bonds in the
manner and upon the terms deemed most advantageous to the City, and to approve the Final Terms
-4-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 340
8.3.a
of each Series of the Bonds, with such additional terms and covenants as the Designated
Representative deems advisable, within the parameters set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached to
this ordinance and incorporated by this reference.
Section 5. Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds.
(a) Registration of Bonds. Each Bond shall be issued only in registered form as to both
principal and interest and the ownership of each Bond shall be recorded on the Bond Register.
(b) Bond Registrar; Duties. The Fiscal Agent is appointed as initial Bond Registrar.
The Bond Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books for the registration and transfer
of the Bonds, which shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The Bond Registrar is
authorized, on behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in
accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent
for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance
and the System of Registration. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations
contained in the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on each Bond. The Bond Registrar
may become an Owner with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and,
to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors
to act as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the
rights of Owners.
(c) Bond Register; Transfer and Exchange. The Bond Register shall contain the name
and mailing address of each Registered Owner and the principal amount and number of each Bond
held by each Registered Owner. A Bond surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for
a Bond or Bonds in any Authorized Denomination of an equal aggregate principal amount and of
the same Series, interest rate and maturity. A Bond may be transferred only if endorsed in the
manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer shall
be without cost to the Owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange
any Bond or transfer registered ownership during the period between the applicable Record Date
and the next upcoming interest payment or redemption date.
(d) Securities Depository; Book -Entry Only Form. If a Bond is to be issued in book -
entry form, DTC shall be appointed as initial Securities Depository and each such Bond initially
shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of DTC. Each Bond registered in
the name of the Securities Depository shall be held fully immobilized in book -entry only form by
the Securities Depository in accordance with the provisions of the Letter of Representations.
Registered ownership of any Bond registered in the name of the Securities Depository may not be
transferred except: (i) to any successor Securities Depository; (ii) to any substitute Securities
Depository appointed by the City; or (iii) to any person if the Bond is no longer to be held in book -
entry only form. Upon the resignation of the Securities Depository, or upon a termination of the
services of the Securities Depository by the City, the City may appoint a substitute Securities
Depository. If (i) the Securities Depository resigns and the City does not appoint a substitute
Securities Depository, or (ii) the City terminates the services of the Securities Depository, the
Bonds no longer shall be held in book -entry only form and the registered ownership of each Bond
may be transferred to any person as provided in this ordinance.
-5-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 341
8.3.a
Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any obligation to participants of any
Securities Depository or the persons for whom they act as nominees regarding accuracy of any
records maintained by the Securities Depository or its participants. Neither the City nor the Bond
Registrar shall be responsible for any notice that is permitted or required to be given to a Registered
Owner except such notice as is required to be given by the Bond Registrar to the Securities
Depository.
Section 6. Form and Execution of Bonds.
(a) Form of Bonds; Signatures and Seal. Each Bond shall be prepared in a form
consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and State law. Each Bond shall be signed by the
Mayor and the City Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and
the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. If
any officer whose manual or facsimile signature appears on a Bond ceases to be an officer of the
City authorized to sign bonds before the Bond bearing his or her manual or facsimile signature is
authenticated by the Bond Registrar, or issued or delivered by the City, that Bond nevertheless
may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be
as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City authorized
to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who, on the
actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds, although he
or she did not hold the required office on its Issue Date.
(b) Authentication. Only a Bond bearing a Certificate of Authentication in
substantially the following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or
obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: "Certificate Of
Authentication. This Bond is one of the fully registered City of Edmonds, Washington, Limited
Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2019, described in the Bond Ordinance." The authorized signing
of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has
been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance.
Section 7. Payment of Bonds. Principal of and interest on each Bond shall be payable
in lawful money of the United States of America. Principal of and interest on each Bond registered
in the name of the Securities Depository is payable in the manner set forth in the Letter of
Representations. Interest on each Bond not registered in the name of the Securities Depository is
payable by electronic transfer on the interest payment date, or by check or draft of the Bond
Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to the Registered Owner at the address appearing on
the Bond Register on the Record Date. However, the City is not required to make electronic
transfers except pursuant to a request by a Registered Owner in writing received on or prior to the
Record Date and at the sole expense of the Registered Owner. Principal of each Bond not
registered in the name of the Securities Depository is payable upon presentation and surrender of
the Bond by the Registered Owner to the Bond Registrar. The Bonds are not subject to acceleration
under any circumstances.
Section 8. Funds and Accounts; Deposit of Proceeds.
(a) Bond Fund. The Bond Fund has been previously created as a special fund of the
City for the sole purpose of paying principal of and interest on the Bonds and other general
-6-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 342
8.3.a
obligation bonds of the City. All amounts allocated to the payment of the principal of and interest
on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Bond Fund as necessary for the timely payment of amounts
due with respect to the Bonds. The principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be paid out of the
Bond Fund. Until needed for that purpose, the City may invest money in the Bond Fund
temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings shall be retained in the Bond
Fund and used for the purposes of that fund.
(b) Project Fund. The Project Fund is created as a fund of the City for the purpose of
paying the costs of the Project. Proceeds received from the sale and delivery of the Bonds shall
be deposited into the Project Fund (or any subaccounts within such fund) and used to pay the costs
of the Project and costs of issuance of the Bonds. Until needed to pay such costs, the City may
invest those proceeds temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings shall be
retained in the Project Fund and used for the purposes of that fund, except that earnings subject to
a federal tax or rebate requirement (if applicable) may be withdrawn from the Project Fund and
used for those tax or rebate purposes.
Section 9. Redemption Provisions and Purchase of Bonds.
(a) Optional Redemption. The Bonds shall be subject to redemption, or prepayment,
at the option of the City on terms acceptable to the Designated Representative, as set forth in the
Bond Purchase Contract, consistent with the parameters set forth in Exhibit A.
(b) Mandatory Redemption. Each Bond that is designated as a Term Bond in the Bond
Purchase Contract, consistent with the parameters set forth in Exhibit A and except as set forth
below, shall be called for redemption at a price equal to the stated principal amount to be redeemed,
plus accrued interest, on the dates and in the amounts as set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract.
If a Term Bond is redeemed under the optional redemption provisions, defeased or purchased by
the City and surrendered for cancellation, the principal amount of the Term Bond so redeemed,
defeased or purchased (irrespective of its actual redemption or purchase price) shall be credited
against one or more scheduled mandatory redemption installments for that Term Bond. The City
shall determine the manner in which the credit is to be allocated and shall notify the Bond Registrar
in writing of its allocation prior to the earliest mandatory redemption date for that Term Bond for
which notice of redemption has not already been given.
(c) Selection of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. If fewer than all of the
outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed at the option of the City, the City shall select the Series and
maturities to be redeemed. If fewer than all of the outstanding Bonds of a maturity of a Series are
to be redeemed, the Securities Depository shall select Bonds registered in the name of the
Securities Depository to be redeemed in accordance with the Letter of Representations, and the
Bond Registrar shall select all other Bonds to be redeemed randomly in such manner as the Bond
Registrar shall determine. All or a portion of the principal amount of any Bond that is to be
redeemed may be redeemed in any Authorized Denomination. If less than all of the outstanding
principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of that Bond to the Bond Registrar,
there shall be issued to the Registered Owner, without charge, a new Bond (or Bonds, at the option
of the Registered Owner) of the same Series, maturity and interest rate in any Authorized
Denomination in the aggregate principal amount to remain outstanding.
-7-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 343
8.3.a
(d) Notice of Redemption. Notice of redemption of each Bond registered in the name
of the Securities Depository shall be given in accordance with the Letter of Representations.
Notice of redemption of each other Bond, unless waived by the Registered Owner, shall be given
by the Bond Registrar not less than 20 nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption
by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the Registered Owner at the address appearing on the Bond
Register on the Record Date. The requirements of the preceding sentence shall be satisfied when
notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by an Owner. In
addition, the redemption notice shall be mailed or sent electronically within the same period to the
MSRB (if required under the Undertaking), to each Rating Agency, and to such other persons and
with such additional information as the Finance Director shall determine, but these additional
mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of any Bond.
(e) Rescission of Optional Redemption Notice. In the case of an optional redemption,
the notice of redemption may state that the City retains the right to rescind the redemption notice
and the redemption by giving a notice of rescission to the affected Registered Owners at any time
prior to the scheduled optional redemption date. Any notice of optional redemption that is so
rescinded shall be of no effect, and each Bond for which a notice of optional redemption has been
rescinded shall remain outstanding.
(f) Effect of Redemption. Interest on each Bond called for redemption shall cease to
accrue on the date fixed for redemption, unless either the notice of optional redemption is rescinded
as set forth above, or money sufficient to effect such redemption is not on deposit in the Bond
Fund or in a trust account established to refund or defease the Bond.
(g) Purchase of Bonds. The City reserves the right to purchase any or all of the Bonds
offered to the City at any time at any price acceptable to the City plus accrued interest to the date
of purchase.
Section 10. Failure To Pay Bonds. If the principal of any Bond is not paid when the
Bond is properly presented at its maturity or date fixed for redemption, the City shall be obligated
to pay interest on that Bond at the same rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturity or
date fixed for redemption until that Bond, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until
sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Bond Fund, or in a trust account
established to refund or defease the Bond, and the Bond has been called for payment by giving
notice of that call to the Registered Owner.
Section 11. Pledge of Taxes. The Bonds constitute a general indebtedness of the City
and are payable from tax revenues of the City and such other money as is lawfully available and
pledged by the City for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds, including real estate
excise taxes (BEET). For as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding, the City irrevocably pledges
that it shall, in the manner provided by law within the constitutional and statutory limitations
provided by law without the assent of the voters, include in its annual property tax levy amounts
sufficient, together with other money that is lawfully available, including real estate excise taxes
(REET), to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same become due. The full faith,
credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the prompt payment of the principal of
and interest on the Bonds and such pledge shall be enforceable in mandamus against the City.
-8-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 344
8.3.a
Section 12. Tax Covenants; Designation of Bonds as "Qualified Tax Exempt
Obligations.".
(a) Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on Bonds. The City covenants that it
will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income
for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or permit any use of
proceeds of the Bonds or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of the Bonds that will cause
interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City
also covenants that it will, to the extent the arbitrage rebate requirements of Section 148 of the
Code are applicable to the Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be treated as having
complied) with those requirements in connection with the Bonds.
(b) Post -Issuance Compliance. The Finance Director is authorized and directed to
review and update the City's written procedures to facilitate compliance by the City with the
covenants in this ordinance and the applicable requirements of the Code that must be satisfied after
the Issue Date to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income for federal
tax purposes.
(c) Designation of Bonds as "Qualified Tax -Exempt Obligations." A Series of the
Bonds may be designated as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for the purposes of
Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, if the following conditions are met:
(1) the Series does not constitute "private activity bonds" within the meaning
of Section 141 of the Code;
(2) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than
private activity bonds and other obligations not required to be included in
such calculation) that the City and any entity subordinate to the City
(including any entity that the City controls, that derives its authority to issue
tax-exempt obligations from the City, or that issues tax-exempt obligations
on behalf of the City) will issue during the calendar year in which the Series
is issued will not exceed $10,000,000; and
(3) the amount of tax-exempt obligations, including the Series, designated by
the City as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for the purposes of
Section 265(b)(3) of the Code during the calendar year in which the Series
is issued does not exceed $10,000,000.
Section 13. Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds. The City may issue refunding
bonds pursuant to State law or use money available from any other lawful source to carry out a
refunding or defeasance plan, which may include (a) paying when due the principal of and interest
on any or all of the Bonds (the "defeased Bonds"); (b) redeeming the defeased Bonds prior to their
maturity; and (c) paying the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If the City sets aside in a special
trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption or defeasance (the "trust
account"), money and/or Government Obligations maturing at a time or times and bearing interest
in amounts sufficient to redeem, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in accordance with their
terms, then all right and interest of the Owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants of this
-9-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 345
8.3.a
ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bonds shall
cease and become void. Thereafter, the Owners of defeased Bonds shall have the right to receive
payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds solely from the trust account and
the defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding. In that event, the City may apply
money remaining in any fund or account (other than the trust account) established for the payment
or redemption of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purpose.
Unless otherwise specified by the City in a refunding or defeasance plan, notice of
refunding or defeasance shall be given, and selection of Bonds for any partial refunding or
defeasance shall be conducted, in the manner prescribed in this ordinance for the redemption of
Bonds.
Section 14. Sale and Delivery of the Bonds.
(a) Manner of Sale of Bonds; Delivery of Bonds. The Designated Representative is
authorized to sell each Series of the Bonds by negotiated sale or private placement or by
competitive sale in accordance with a notice of sale consistent with this ordinance, based on the
assessment of the Designated Representative of market conditions, in consultation with
appropriate City officials and staff, Bond Counsel and other advisors. In determining the method
of sale of a Series and accepting the Final Terms, the Designated Representative shall take into
account those factors that, in the judgment of the Designated Representative, may be expected to
result in the lowest true interest cost to the City.
(b) Procedure for Negotiated Sale or Private Placement. If the Designated
Representative determines that a Series of the Bonds is to be sold by negotiated sale or private
placement, the Designated Representative shall select one or more Purchasers with which to
negotiate such sale. The Bond Purchase Contract for each Series of the Bonds shall set forth the
Final Terms. The Designated Representative is authorized to execute the Bond Purchase Contract
on behalf of the City, so long as the terms provided therein are consistent with the terms of this
ordinance.
(c) Procedure for Competitive Sale. If the Designated Representative determines that
a Series of the Bonds is to be sold by competitive sale, the Designated Representative shall cause
the preparation of an official notice of bond sale setting forth parameters for the Final Terms and
any other bid parameters that the Designated Representative deems appropriate consistent with
this ordinance. Bids for the purchase of each Series of the Bonds shall be received at such time or
place and by such means as the Designated Representative directs. On the date and time
established for the receipt of bids, the Designated Representative (or the designee of the
Designated Representative) shall open bids and shall cause the bids to be mathematically verified.
The Designated Representative is authorized to award, on behalf of the City, the winning bid and
accept the winning bidder's offer to purchase that Series of the Bonds, with such adjustments to
the aggregate principal amount and principal amount per maturity as the Designated
Representative deems appropriate, consistent with the terms of this ordinance, and such award
shall constitute the Bond Purchase Contract. The Designated Representative may reject any or all
bids submitted and may waive any formality or irregularity in any bid or in the bidding process if
the Designated Representative deems it to be in the City's best interest to do so. If all bids are
rejected, that Series of the Bonds may be sold pursuant to negotiated sale or in any manner
-10-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 346
8.3.a
provided by law as the Designated Representative determines is in the best interest of the City,
within the parameters set forth in this ordinance.
(d) Preparation, Execution and Delivery of the Bonds. The Bonds will be prepared at
City expense and will be delivered to the Purchaser in accordance with the Bond Purchase
Contract, together with the approving legal opinion of Bond Counsel regarding the Bonds.
Section 15. Official Statement; Continuing Disclosure.
(a) Preliminary Official Statement Deemed Final. The Designated Representative
shall review and, if acceptable to him or her, approve the preliminary Official Statement prepared
in connection with each sale of a Series of the Bonds to the public or through a Purchaser as a
placement agent. For the sole purpose of the Purchaser's compliance with paragraph (b)(1) of Rule
15c2-12, if applicable, the Designated Representative is authorized to deem that preliminary
Official Statement final as of its date, except for the omission of information permitted to be
omitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City approves the distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds
of a preliminary Official Statement that has been approved by the Designated Representative and
been deemed final, if applicable, in accordance with this subsection.
(b) Approval of Final Official Statement. The City approves the preparation of a final
Official Statement for each Series of the Bonds to be sold to the public in the form of the
preliminary Official Statement that has been approved and deemed final in accordance with
subsection (a), with such modifications and amendments as the Designated Representative deems
necessary or desirable, and further authorizes the Designated Representative to execute and deliver
such final Official Statement to the Purchaser if required under Rule 15c2-12. The City authorizes
and approves the distribution by the Purchaser of the final Official Statement so executed and
delivered to purchasers and potential purchasers of a Series of the Bonds.
(c) Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure. If necessary to meet the
requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12, as applicable to the Purchaser acting as a
participating underwriter for a Series of the Bonds, the Designated Representative is authorized to
execute a written undertaking to provide continuing disclosure for the benefit of holders of a Series
of the Bonds in substantially the form attached as Exhibit B.
Section 16. Supplemental and Amendatory Ordinances. The City may supplement or
amend this ordinance for any one or more of the following purposes without the consent of any
Owners of the Bonds:
(a) To add covenants and agreements that do not materially adversely affect the
interests of Owners, or to surrender any right or power reserved to or conferred upon the City.
(b) To cure any ambiguities, or to cure, correct or supplement any defective provision
contained in this ordinance in a manner that does not materially adversely affect the interest of the
Beneficial Owners of the Bonds.
Section 17. General Authorization and Ratification. The Designated Representative
and other appropriate officers of the City are severally authorized to take such actions and to
execute such documents as in their judgment may be necessary or desirable to carry out the
-11-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 347
8.3.a
transactions contemplated in connection with this ordinance, and to do everything necessary for
the prompt delivery of each Series of the Bonds to the Purchaser thereof and for the proper
application, use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds. All actions taken prior to the
effective date of this ordinance in furtherance of the purposes described in this ordinance and not
inconsistent with the terms of this ordinance are ratified and confirmed in all respects.
Section 18. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate
and severable. If a court of competent jurisdiction, all appeals having been exhausted or all appeal
periods having run, finds any provision of this ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable as to any
person or circumstance, such offending provision shall, if feasible, be deemed to be modified to
be within the limits of enforceability or validity. However, if the offending provision cannot be
so modified, it shall be null and void with respect to the particular person or circumstance, and all
other provisions of this ordinance in all other respects, and the offending provision with respect to
all other persons and all other circumstances, shall remain valid and enforceable.
Section 19. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after its passage and five days following its publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Edmonds,
Washington, at an open public meeting thereof, this 16a' day of July, 2019.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bond Counsel
-12-
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 348
8.3.a
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS
(a) Principal Amount. The Bonds may be issued in one or more Series and shall
not exceed the aggregate principal amount of $4,000,000.
(b) Date or Dates. Each Bond shall be dated its Issue Date, which date may
not be later than one year after the effective date of this
ordinance.
(c) Denominations, Name, etc. The Bonds shall be issued in Authorized Denominations
and shall be numbered separately in the manner and shall
bear any name and additional designation as deemed
necessary or appropriate by the Designated
Representative.
(d) Interest Rate(s). Each Bond shall bear interest at a fixed rate per annum
(computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-
day months) from the Issue Date or from the most recent
date for which interest has been paid or duly provided for,
whichever is later. One or more rates of interest may be
fixed for the Bonds. No rate of interest for any Bond may
exceed 6.00%, and the true interest cost to the City for
each Series of the Bonds may not exceed 5.00%.
(e) Payment Dates. Interest shall be payable semiannually on dates
acceptable to the Designated Representative,
commencing no later than one year following the Issue
Date. Principal payments shall commence on a date
acceptable to the Designated Representative and shall be
payable at maturity or in mandatory redemption
installments annually thereafter, on dates acceptable to
the Designated Representative.
(f) Final Maturity. Each Series shall mature no later than the date that is
21 years after the Issue Date of that Series.
(g) Redemption Rights. The Designated Representative may approve in the Bond
Purchase Contract provisions for the optional and
mandatory redemption of Bonds, subject to the following:
A-1
51351725.E Packet Pg. 349
8.3.a
(1) Optional Redemption. Any Bond may be
designated as being (A) subject to redemption at the
option of the City prior to its maturity date on the
dates and at the prices set forth in the Bond Purchase
Contract; or (B) not subject to redemption prior to
its maturity date. If a Bond is subject to optional
redemption prior to its maturity, it must be subject
to such redemption on one or more dates occurring
not more than 10'/2 years after the Issue Date.
(2) Mandatory Redemption. Any Bond may be
designated as a Term Bond, subject to mandatory
redemption prior to its maturity on the dates and in
the amounts set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract.
(h) Price. The purchase price for each Series of the Bonds may not
be less than 90% or more than 130% of the stated
principal amount of that Series.
(i) Other Terms and Conditions. (1) A Series of the Bonds may not be issued if it would
cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed the
City's legal debt capacity on the Issue Date.
(2) The Designated Representative may determine
whether it is in the City's best interest to provide for
bond insurance or other credit enhancement; and
may accept such additional terms, conditions and
covenants as he or she may determine are in the best
interests of the City, consistent with this ordinance.
A-2
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 350
8.3.a
Exhibit B
[Form oll
UNDERTAKING TO PROVIDE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
City of Edmonds, Washington
Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2019
The City of Edmonds, Washington (the "City"), makes the following written Undertaking
for the benefit of holders of the above -referenced bonds (the "Bonds"), for the sole purpose of
assisting the Purchaser in meeting the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12, as
applicable to a participating underwriter for the Bonds. Capitalized terms used but not defined
below shall have the meanings given in Ordinance No. of the City (the "Bond Ordinance").
(a) Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Listed Events.
The City undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a designated
agent, to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, accompanied by
identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB:
(i) Annual financial information and operating data of the type included in the final
official statement for the Bonds and described in paragraph (b)(i) ("annual financial
information");
(ii) Timely notice (not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event)
of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds:
(1) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) non-payment related defaults,
if material; (3) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial
difficulties; (4) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial
difficulties; (5) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to
perform; (6) adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of
proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notice of Proposed Issue (IRS Form
5701 — TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax
status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds;
(7) modifications to rights of holders of the Bonds, if material; (8) bond calls (other
than scheduled mandatory redemptions of Term Bonds), if material, and tender
offers; (9) defeasances; (10) release, substitution, or sale of property securing
repayment of the Bonds, if material; (11) rating changes; (12) bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City, as such "Bankruptcy Events"
are defined in Rule 15c2-12; (13) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or
acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of
the City other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive
agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement
relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material;
(14) appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a
trustee, if material; (15) incurrence of a financial obligation of the City or obligated
person, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority
rights, or other similar terms of a financial obligation of the City or obligated
person, any of which affect security holders, if material; and (16) default, event of
acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar events under
B-1
51351725.E Packet Pg. 351
8.3.a
the terms of the financial obligation of the City or obligated person, any of which
reflect financial difficulties. The term "financial obligation" means a (i) debt
obligation; (ii) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as
security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or (iii)
guarantee of (i) or (ii). The term "financial obligation" shall not include municipal
securities as to which a final official statement has been provided to the MSRB
consistent with Rule 15c2-12.
(iii) Timely notice of a failure by the City to provide the required annual financial
information described in paragraph (b)(i) on or before the date specified in
paragraph (b)(ii).
(b) Type of Annual Financial Information Undertaken to be Provided. The annual
financial information that the City undertakes to provide in paragraph (a):
(i) Shall consist of (1) annual financial statements prepared (except as noted in the
financial statements) in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting
principles applicable to local governmental units of the State such as the City, as
such principles may be changed from time to time; (2) general obligation debt that
has been authorized and the amount outstanding; (3) assessed valuation for that
fiscal year; (4) assessed valuation for the fiscal year regular ad valorem property
tax levy rate amount rate limitation and percentage of tax collected during the fiscal
year; and (5) amount of general fund revenues from other major tax sources;
(ii) Shall be provided not later than the last day of the ninth month after the end of each
fiscal year of the City (currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such fiscal
year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, commencing with the
City's fiscal year ending December 31, 20[19]; and
(iii) May be provided in a single or multiple documents, and may be incorporated by
specific reference to documents available to the public on the Internet website of
the MSRB or filed with the SEC.
If not submitted as part of the annual financial information described in paragraph (b)(i)
above, the City will provide or cause to be provided to the MSRB audited financial statements,
when and if available.
(c) Amendment of Undertaking. This Undertaking is subject to amendment after the
primary offering of the Bonds without the consent of any holder of any Bond, or of any broker,
dealer, municipal securities dealer, participating underwriter, Rating Agency or the MSRB, under
the circumstances and in the manner permitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City will give notice to the
MSRB of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a brief
statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual financial
information to be provided, the annual financial information containing the amended financial
information will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change on the type of
information to be provided.
B-2
51351725.E Packet Pg. 352
8.3.a
(d) Beneficiaries. This Undertaking shall inure to the benefit of the City and the holder
of each Bond, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person.
(e) Termination of Undertaking. The City's obligations under this Undertaking shall
terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Bonds. In addition, the City's obligations under
this Undertaking shall terminate if the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 that require the City to comply
with this Undertaking become legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason, as
confirmed by an opinion of Bond Counsel delivered to the City, and the City provides timely notice
of such termination to the MSRB.
(f) Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the
City learns of any failure to comply with this Undertaking, the City will proceed with due diligence
to cause such noncompliance to be corrected. No failure by the City or other obligated person to
comply with this Undertaking shall constitute a default in respect of the Bonds. The sole remedy
of any holder of a Bond shall be to take action to compel the City or other obligated person to
comply with this Undertaking, including seeking an order of specific performance from an
appropriate court.
(g) Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Finance
Director or his or her designee is the person designated, in accordance with the Bond Ordinance,
to carry out the Undertaking in accordance with Rule 15c2-12, including, without limitation, the
following actions:
(i) Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided;
(ii) Determining whether any event specified in paragraph (a) has occurred, assessing
its materiality, where necessary, with respect to the Bonds, and preparing and
disseminating any required notice of its occurrence;
(iii) Determining whether any person other than the City is an "obligated person" within
the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 with respect to the Bonds, and obtaining from such
person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and notice of
listed events for that person required under Rule 15c2-12;
(iv) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and consultants, including
financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the City in carrying out
this Undertaking; and
(v) Effecting any necessary amendment of this Undertaking.
B-3
51351725.E Packet Pg. 353
8.3.a
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Edmonds, Washington (the "City"), hereby
certify as follows:
1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. (the "Ordinance") is a full, true and
correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held
at the regular meeting place thereof on , 2019, as that ordinance appears on
the minute book of the City.
2. The Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after publication in the
City's official newspaper, which publication date is expected to be , 2019.
3. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting
and a majority of the members voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance.
Dated: , 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
Scott Passey, City Clerk
51351725.6 Packet Pg. 354
8.3.b
City of Edmonds
City Council Meeting
Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2019 (Civic Park Financing)
Northwest Municipal Advisors
July 16, 2019
NORTHWEST
MUNICIPAL ADVISORS
Packet Pg. 355
8.3.b
Bond Market
Interest rates have been falling since the beginning of 2019 and have
approached historical lows seen in 2016 (immediately after Brexit)
The chart below shows long-term interest rates for an index of well rated
(AA) general obligation bonds
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Bond Buyer 20-Bond GO Index
1990 to Present
o r- N Sr 1 �a CD ti W M 0 r-� N M"t Ln "0 1� W M 0 r-1 N Cr 1"t L7 k.0 1� W M
M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri r_1 ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri
M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r-I r-I rl rl rl r-I rl r-I r1 rl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
-20 BB
w
NORTHWEST a
2 MUNICIPAL
Packet Pg. 356
8.3.b
Outstanding General Obligation Bonds
ding Debt for the City
LTGO Bonds (Moody's: Aa3)
LTGO Ref 2012
LTGO Ref 2016
Total LTGO Bonds Debt
$1, 400, 000
$1,200,000
$1, 000, 000
$800,000
$ 600, 000
$400,000
$200,000
tiCi 111 ° ti°may 1°1
Par Outstanding
$ 5,210,000 $
2,579,489
Callable Par
2,635,000
1,008,918
$ 7,789,489 $ 3,643,918
tio�� goy°` tio�� tio�o
■ LTGO Ref 2012 ■ LTGO Ref 2016
,6o
Final Mat. Coupon Range Call Da
12/1/2031 1.75 % - 2.25 % 12/1/20
12/1/2026 1.67% 12/1/20 ii
lid
a
u
v
A
r
c
m
E
t
0
.r
a
NORTHWEST
3 MUNICIPAL
Packet Pg. 357
8.3.b
Financing Plan
Provide approximately $3.7 million of bond proceeds for Civic Park project
Financing Structure: Level debt service, amortized over 20 years
LTGO Bonds 2019 (Civic Park)
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■
O ,yti ,y"V .�')� ,� ,y< ti(0 rLA 00 ,yg ,�o .�'y �� ,I> �� �`' 1
rL0 , O , O rL0 1P 10 -P -P 1�1 tiD ,�� ,y0 ,tip ti0 tiq ti0 tiD ti0 �O ,�O
Estimated average annual debt service: $244,000
NORTHWEST
4 MUNICIPAL
Packet Pg. 358
8.3.b
Delegation Authority
Under Washington State law, the City Council can delegate final approval
of bond sale to designated individuals
This has been utilized on the City's prior transactions
This delegated authority allows the bond sale to occur on days other than
a City Council date
Certain parameters are set in advance in the Ordinance
— Maximum issue size
— Maximum interest rate
— Final maturity
Provides more flexibility in timing bond issue
NORTHWEST
5 MUNICIPAL
Packet Pg. 359
8.3.b
Schedule of Events
July 16 Adoption of Bond Ordinance
August — Early Sept. Drafting of Preliminary Official Statement (POS)
Mid — Late Sept. Rating Agency Call
Early October Receive Bond Rating
Release POS to Potential Investors
Mid October Competitive Bond Sale
Late October Bond Closing
NORTHWEST
6 MUNICIPAL
Packet Pg. 360
8.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/16/2019
City of Edmonds Facility Condition Assessment study by Mckinstry
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Public Works & Utilities
Preparer: Royce Napolitino
Background/History
In 2017 the City of Edmonds commissioned Mckinstry to perform a two year Facility Condition
Assessment report to supplement the previous FCA report performed by Cardno LLC in 2011 and 2012.
Presented during 07-09-19 Parks & Public Works and Finance Committees with approval for full Council
presentation.
Staff Recommendation
Accept Facility Condition Assessment study for future planning consideration.
Narrative
Facility Condition Assessments provide facility condition and budget data for the repair and upkeep of
facilities. After reviewing the information gathered in the Cardno FCA report there was a need for
further information to be gathered to accurately assess the condition of the building portfolio. Mckinstry
was instructed to expand or update the previously gathered information and include Mechanical,
Electrical and Plumbing systems to the scope of the report. The Facility Condition Index (FCI) score was
determined by the Backlog of Maintenance and Repair methodology. This scoring model focuses on the
correction of deficient building systems and those at or near end of useful life functionality. The Backlog
of Maintenance and Repair method helps identify building system and budget requirements to focus
capital renewal funds on functionality, condition and the ability of the facility to meet the current and
future needs of the City.
Packet Pg. 361