Loading...
2020-06-02 City Council - Full Agenda-2591o Agenda Edmonds City Council V Hy° VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE, HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JUNE 2, 2020, 7:00 PM "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 26, 2020 2. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. 3. Acknowledge receipts of Claims for Damages from Carl Stout, Gabriel Marcu and Carole Joy 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (MAY BE SUBMITTED TO PUBLICCOMMENT@EDMONDSWA.GOV) 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (20 min) 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. Wastewater Treatment Plant Incinerator Replacement Project Update and Recommendation (30 min) 2. Discussion of Public Service Announcement (PSA) regarding Facial Coverings (20 min) 3. Discussion of Snohomish County Public Defender Association Contract Renewal (40 min) 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda June 2, 2020 Page 1 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of May 26, 2020 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 05-26-2020 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 2 5.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING DRAFT MINUTES May 26, 2020 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Laura Johnson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office Scott Passey, City Clerk ALSO PRESENT Zach Bauder, Student Representative The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Buckshnis read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO REMOVE ITEM 7.1, WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INCINERATOR REPLACEMENT PROJECT UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATION; AND 8.1, DISCUSSION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION CONTRACT RENEWAL, AS IT WAS UNCERTAIN THEY WERE NECESSARY UNDER THE REVISED OPMA, AND TO. ADD AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) BEFORE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND IN ADDITION TO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT AGENDA ITEM 9. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.20.110(1)(i) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 1 Packet Pg. 3 5.1.a At 7:04 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 15 minutes. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Distelhorst. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, and Sharon Cates, City Attorney's Office. At 7:20 p.m. Mayor Nelson extended the executive session for 15 minutes. At 7:35 p.m., Mayor Nelson extended the executive session for 15 minutes. At 7:51 p.m., Mayor Nelson extended the executive session an additional 15 minutes. The executive session concluded at 8:08 p.m. Mayor Nelson reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 8:08 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO PULL ITEM 5.5, EMPLOYEE SEPARATION AGREEMENT, AND APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 15, 2020 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 19, 2020 3. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS 7. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT 1. EMPLOYEE SEPARATION AGREEMENT (Previously Agenda Item 5.5) COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO REMOVE NUMBER 24. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON, AND PAINE; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO IMPROVE THE WORDING OF SECTION 4 AS DESCRIBED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING NO. City Attorney Jeff Taraday asked for clarification on the vote on the first motion, whether it was four in favor and three opposed. Councilmember Paine said she intended to vote no on the first motion asked how Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 2 Packet Pg. 4 5.1.a to correct that. Mr. Taraday said a main motion had not been made so another amendment could be made to add Section 24 back into the separation agreement. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADD SECTION 24 BACK IN. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, advising that a main motion had not yet been made. Mr. Taraday answered given that the Council had already voted on two amendments and, for the sake of consistency, he suggested the Council continue with amendments. Councilmember K. Johnson commented the motion is a reconsideration. Mr. Taraday agreed, it could be considered a motion for reconsideration. Since Councilmember Paine voted in the majority, she has the right to move for reconsideration of the motion. What matters most is that the intent is clear; if the motion passes, Paragraph 24 will remain in the agreement. He clarified a yes vote means a Councilmember wants Paragraph 24 to remain as part of the agreement; a no vote means a Councilmember does not want Paragraph 24 to remain as part of the agreement. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked Mr. Taraday to explain the impact of the yes and no votes again. Mr. Taraday explained if a Councilmember voted yes on Councilmember Paine's motion, they were indicating they wanted Paragraph 24 to remain as part of the agreement. If a Councilmember voted no on Councilmember Paine's motion, they were indicating they did not want Paragraph 24 to be part of the agreement. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND OLSON VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE SEPARATION AGREEMENT. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST, PAINE AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND OLSON VOTING NO. 8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (SUBMITTED TO PUBLICCOMMENT(UDMONDSWA.GOV) See Attached. 9. ACTION ITEM 1. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INCINERATOR REPLACEMENT PROJECT UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATION This item was removed from the agenda via action taken under Agenda Item 4. 10. STUDY ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION CONTRACT RENEWAL This item was removed from the agenda via action taken under Agenda Item 4. 2. UPDATE ON EMERGENCY CLOSURE/ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL COMP PLAN Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 3 Packet Pg. 5 HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson advised this item is to update Council on how the Emergency Closure/Essential Personnel Comp Plan has been functioning since approved by Council on March 24, 2020. She explained employees were divided into three categories, 1) working physically on site 8+ hours/week, 2) telecommuting more than 2 days/week and may come into to the office less than 8 hours/week to obtain materials, etc., and 3) employees who cannot telecommute and are not required to physically report to work and are on standby leave. She reported this has worked very well; Public Works, Parks and Police employees have used the standby work option to have employees work split shift in order to isolate employees so a shift of employees is available in the event there is any viral contamination in a work group and has allowed the City to continue essential public services. Additionally the hazard pay has been well received by the unions and the feedback she has received appreciated the Council proactively taking this approach. Ms. Neill Hoyson explained departments have been directed that as of June 1st, the standby leave feature of the policy will no longer be used as there are sufficient protocols in place for employee safety including staggered shifts and personal protective equipment (PPE) to ensure employees who are working less than 6 feet apart are able to protect themselves. To date, hazard pay has totaled $57,000 from when it was enacted on March 24tn Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Ms. Neill Hoyson for answering her questions today. She asked Ms. Neill Hoyson to explain A, B and C, noting citizens have been asking about Parks employees. She also asked if employees could be in more than one category. Ms. Neill Hoyson explained Category A employees are working more than a de minimis amount of time physically on site, 8+hours per week or for a part-time employee, 20% of their work week. Employees in Category B are telecommuting for at least two days/week but may be required to come to office to pick up materials, check mail, etc. for less than 8 hours/week. Employees in Category C are on standby leave; they are at home but available to the City during regular work hours should they be needed. In any single work week, an employee cannot be in more than one category, but employees may be in different categories during a pay period. For example, in Public Works where employees are working split shifts, one week they would be in Category A and the next week in Category C. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the $57,000 spent on hazard pay and asked if hazard pay included an employee in Category A working 20% of the time but receiving their full salary. Ms. Neill Hoyson explained hazard pay is the additional pay differential employees are receiving; 6% for employees in Category A and 3% for employees in Category B, the cost in addition to regular salaries. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding if an employee was in Category A, they worked 20% of the time, for example Parks employees work one week on working half days and one week off. Ms. Ms. Neill Hoyson agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis asked what other cities were doing and how this formula was determined. Ms. Neill Hoyson said the intent was minimal potential exposure for employees to the virus based on how much they are working which was reason for one day or more. If someone comes into the office very briefly to pick up materials, that is a very minimal exposure, compared to someone how comes into the office more than one day/week and has an exponential potential exposure to the virus. She did not know how other cities chose to create thresholds; Edmonds may be the only city that had categorized employees in this way. She has heard other cities are providing a flat 6% for employees working in any capacity. In her opinion it was fair and equity to differentiate between what was paid to employees telecommuting and may have minimal exposure from coming into the office versus employees on standby leave. This formula was created based on her experience and best practices and what was felt to be fair to employees and the easiest to implement for payroll purposes. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 4 Packet Pg. 6 5.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the City would follow the governor's plan for reopening in phases or would there be a separate determination regarding when employees return to work or changing the parameters. Ms. Neill Hoyson said as of June 1', the standby leave portion would be eliminated. The standby leave was a tool to minimize potential exposure and continue essential government services prior to having procedures and PPE available. That was an internal decision and now there are enough protocols in place for employees to return to work without being isolated by shifts. That is separate from the governor's stay at home order. A document is being developed that will be available this week that outlines phases for reopening the City, such as when employees should expect to return to work. With regard to the governor's stay at home order, government external facing services do not start until Phase 3 such as reopening buildings, allowing the public to have face-to-face services, etc. The City plans to continue supporting telecommuting as much as possible where appropriate and even in Phase 3, if an employee does not provide face-to-face services, it is likely teleworking will continue to be supported. Councilmember Paine asked what had been biggest challenge for managers in the last several weeks and suggested keeping track of them in case this was necessary again, which she hoped did not occur. She asked if there was anything that had surprised managers and what they would do differently. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered for many of those supervising office staff, managing remote employees is a very specific skill set and required a crash course. It has pushed government forward in understanding quite a bit of work can be done in that capacity which potentially can impact bottom line costs as well as allowing flexibility for staff. Communication is the biggest challenge when dealing with remote employees, ensuring appropriate and sufficient communication to keep employees informed, maintaining a cohesive workforce, having regular meetings with staff and flow of information, and departments all sharing same information. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the $1.27 million the City will receive from the governor and asked if those funds can be used for hazard pay. Mayor Nelson answered hazard pay could qualify as an expense for the $1.265 million the City will receive and is specifically identified as an example of how the funds can be used. In addition to eliminating Category C, Councilmember Buckshnis asked if employees in Categories A and B would be allowed to work longer hours and to work in the community such as Parks employees. She acknowledged the need to keep employees safe. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered as of June I", all employees who do physical work will be working 40 hours/week. Parks is working on shift scheduling to minimize the number of employees working at a time such as shift staggering, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis said she is often asked where the Parks employees are. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed Council Administrative/Legislative Assistant Maureen Judge has been working one day/week in the office. She meets with Ms. Judge in the office on that day, Ms. Judge comes into the office occasionally and she checks in with her multiple times a day regarding her work projects. That has worked well and nearly all Councilmembers have been in contact with Ms. Judge regarding projects since she has been telecommuting. When Ms. Judge returns to the office, there likely will be plexiglass on her desk, the door will remain locked, Councilmembers will be asked to wear masks, disinfectant wipes will be available and the City's custodians clean the office twice/day. She summarized the Council office is a good example of telecommuting working well to provide necessary services without putting Ms. Judge in jeopardy. When she returns, Council President Fraley-Monillas requested no one hang around the Council office unless absolutely necessary. Councilmember K. Johnson referred to an email she sent Ms. Neill Hoyson earlier today with a number of questions. Ms. Neill Hoyson advised she had been traveling today. Councilmember K. Johnson asked the following questions: 1. How many people are employed by the City? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered there are approximately 250 FTE. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 5 Packet Pg. 7 5.1.a 2. How many receive 6% hazard pay? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered it would be close to the number she first reported to Council on March 24 b when the plan as approved. The numbers may shift each week depending on how a supervisor decided to use employees. 3. Of those employees receiving hazard pay, do they receive hazard pay only for the time they are potentially exposed to COVID-19 (for example if they are in the office 20% of the time) or do they receive hazard pay for their full 40 hours? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered for the full 40 hours. Councilmember K. Johnson said she had a problem with that; employees are basically receiving hazard pay when working from home. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered employees who are telecommuting at least 2 days/week and may come into the office 8 hours or less receive a 3% pay differential. 4. How many employees cannot work from home? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered very few employees cannot work from home, actually only one. The majority of employees in Category C are working a split shift including employees at the wastewater treatment plan, stormwater and streets, police clerks and parks. Physical laborers cannot do work from home on their week off although they may be assigned online training and police clerks are not allowed to do the majority of their work from home due to access issues related to confidentiality. 5. Has the Mayor shortened the required work schedule for regular employees to be less than 40 hours/week? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered Mayor Nelson has not taken any action as far as work week schedules. 6. Are work hours accurately reported, whether employees are in the office or working from home? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered that may be question for Finance and Payroll related to timesheets. 7. Are employee timesheets subject to public record requests? Mr. Taraday assumed that at least certain aspects are. If the City receives a request, it will need to be more closely reviewed. 8. What are the weekly costs for employee salary and benefits? Ms. Neill Hoyson did not know but could provide that information. 9. How much is the City paying in salary and benefits if employees are not required to work 40 hours/week such as employees working split shifts? Councilmember K. Johnson said she was trying to determine if employees were being paid for not working. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered there are employees being paid to be on standby leave and be available to come into work if they are needed. Councilmember K. Johnson observed that will end June 1' 10. How much has been spent for those individuals. Ms. Neill Hoyson offered to speak to Finance; she was not certain those hours had been coded differently. 11. The governor's stay at home/stay safe order has been extended several times and shortly after it was enacted, the City adopted an Emergency Closure/Essential Personnel Comp Plan. When the governor's order has been extended, the City's order has not been reviewed. Is it an indefinite plan? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered it is tied to the governor's stay at home order. Council can ask to revisit and make changes. 12. Has MSRC or Attorney General reviewed the City's policy or indicated if other cities are maintaining full salaries and benefits like Edmonds is? Ms. Neill Hoyson answered there are other cities undertaking the same processes, particularly split shifts with employees staying at home. The Attorney General has not reviewed the City's policy. Councilmember K. Johnson made the following motion in light of the lack of the information: COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO SUSPEND THIS POLICY UNTIL WE HAVE MORE INFORMATION SO THAT THE COUNCIL CAN REVIEW THE INFORMATION IN ADVANCE AND COME BACK AND TALK ABOUT IT AT A FUTURE MEETING. Council President Fraley-Monillas raised a point of information, asking Mayor Nelson what his plans were for staff returning to work. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 6 Packet Pg. 8 5.1.a Councilmember Olson raised a point of order, asking if the Council could take action when this item was not on the agenda as an action item. Mr. Taraday answered whether an item is a study session or an action item on the agenda is not binding on the Council and the Council can do what they want at a regular meeting. In response to Council President Fraley-Monillas, Mayor Nelson said most employees are returning at the end of the month. The return of the remainder will depend on when the county enters Phase 2. Council President Fraley-Monillas Council asked whether the Council approved this policy. Mayor Nelson advised the Council approved the plan based on the projected numbers and he was unclear why Councilmembers were surprised who was doing what and where. He commented looking back was always interesting versus acting in the moment. The policy the Council approved protected the health and safety of City employees and allowed staff to continue to provide essential, critical City services during this entire time. For example, when there are wastewater treatment plant problems, instead of flooding of raw sewage or pollution into waterways, the shift differentials allowed employees to work and prevented any outbreaks. By contrast, other cities have had to shut down their entire city government because employees were exposed. He was proud Edmonds employees have been safe overall due to the policies the Council approved. Councilmember Buckshnis observed everybody was going back to work full-time on June 1st so she would not support the motion. She referred to a question she sent to Mayor Nelson and Mr. Turley about the dollar amount of that expense. She relayed a lot of people have been asking where the City's employees are. She was glad the City had not been required to shut down due to contamination, noting citizens have questioned the need to work half -days when employees are working outdoors. She requested a summary of what the City learned from this experience, noting it is expensive to pay full salaries since March especially for hazard work. MOTION FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING YES. Councilmember K. Johnson said she would like answers to all her questions so Councilmembers can fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities to citizens. Councilmember Distelhorst thanked Ms. Neill Hoyson and Mayor Nelson for the work they have done to keep employees safe and employed. As far as he was aware via this plan, the City had not had to furlough or lay off employees which is very important. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) At 8:51 p.m., Mayor Nelson announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 15 minutes. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Nelson, and Councilmembers K. Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Paine, Olson, L. Johnson, and Distelhorst. City Attorney Jeff Taraday was also present. At 9:08 Mayor Nelson extended the executive session an additional 15 minutes. At 9:25 p.m. Mayor Nelson extended the executive session for an additional 15 minutes. At 9:40 p.m. Mayor Nelson extended the executive session for an additional 10 minutes. At 9:51 p.m. Mayor Nelson extended the executive session for an additional 5 minutes. The executive session concluded at 9:56 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 7 Packet Pg. 9 5.1.a 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN Mayor Nelson reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 9:56 p.m. 13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson thanked everyone for practicing social distancing, washing their hands and for wearing masks. He urged the public to wear a mask if they were unable to maintain social distancing, advising it really makes a difference. 14. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Distelhorst relayed his understanding that residents and small businesses are struggling looking at the path ahead. However, this is about the health and safety of everyone, their families, their neighbors and the City and he hoped everyone would continue to follow the professional health guidance. He referred to his haircut performed by his wife and him. If people do not follow professional guidance, cases will rise which will prolong the situation. He urged the public to wear masks, keep physical distance, observe hygiene protocols and stay home as much as allowable. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed at today's Rotary meeting people were angry and complaining. This area is doing well, have done it for a couple months and are reaching the home stretch. She urged the public to listen to the mayor and governor and assured we can do this. She recognized mental health is a huge issue and she encouraged anyone in need to seek help. She urged the public to exercise kindness, relaying her observation of a person nearly hit by a car telling a driver to slow down and the drive got out of his car and yelled at her. She summarized: practice kindness and smiles, wear your mask and wash your hands — we're almost at the end of the path. Councilmember Paine displayed her mask. She thanked the volunteers who are providing masks, noting cloth masks work fine. She relayed the Snohomish Health District is seeking volunteer contract tracers; further information is available via the medical reserve corps. Bringing down the numbers to reach Phase 2 will require masks, social and physical distancing and contract tracing and wearing a mask is not a big deal. Everyone is looking forward to Phase 2 where people can have more of a life. She expressed her appreciation for Edmonds volunteers, noting it is one of the best parts about Edmonds. Councilmember Olson said it has been several years since May 3 V was proclaimed Michael Reagan Day in Edmonds for his tireless portrait art remembering fallen heroes. Mr. Reagan spends most of every day doing that same tireless work. She thanked Mr. Reagan for his work and asked the public to visit his website, FallenHeroesProject.org and wish him a Happy Michael Reagan Day on May 31s` Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed Mr. Reagan was a great man. She reported she celebrated Memorial Day independent of any group event by visiting the cemeteries to honor her parents, nephew and other relatives; a special time although everyone was not together as they usually are. Council President Fraley-Monillas reported Snohomish County is slightly behind King County in achieving the numbers to reaching Phase 2. That is being carefully considered and she was confident that Snohomish County would apply to enter Phase 2 as soon as they reached the appropriate level. The Snohomish Health District is hiring people to do contract tracing which is an important part of fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Another important part is testing; there are currently not enough to test everyone, only those who are sick. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 8 Packet Pg. 10 5.1.a Councilmember K. Johnson gave a shout out to Dale Hoggins, the driving force behind the Memorial Day celebrations for many years. She also thanked the members of Cemetery Board for their efforts. She commented this is the first year in a long time she has not attended that event; people appreciate something more when it is not there. She also thanked members of public for following all the health guidance, noting together as a community we can do a good job. She relayed frustration she has received from citizens that other cities have done a better job inviting public comments. Although there is a place on the agenda and an email address for comments, she suggested the Council discuss its options because citizens do not feel they are participating in the democratic process. She suggested the Council consider reading the public comments aloud. Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Mayor Nelson for modeling his mask and for setting a good example. She thanked all the City's employees for everything they are doing to keep the City running smoothly during these very unusual times said their work is greatly appreciated. 15. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 9 Packet Pg. 11 5.1.a Public Comment for 5/26/20 Council Meeting: 5/26/20 Liz Brown, Subject: Public Comment on Council Agenda Item My name is Elizabethe Brown and I live on 242nd Street in Edmonds. I wish to comment on the action item on tonight's agenda, regarding a recommendation to move forward and replace the incinerator at the Waste Water Treatment Plant with a gasification system. I urge the City Council to delay action on this item. The best way to serve the residents of Edmonds is to perform due diligence on the risks of gasification compared to the less expensive replacement of the incinerator currently in use at the plant to treat sewage sludge. The Council packet is missing a comparison of the costs of incineration versus gasification. Instead, the presentation to the Council compares gasification ("Project B") with pyrolysis ("Project A"). I would remind the Council that last December, City staff recommended pyrolysis as the preferred option, with $11 million allocated in the 2020 budget toward this project (in addition to $2 million in design work spent on the pyrolysis project, which is at the 80% design stage). Now staff is urging the Council to abandon pyrolysis in favor of gasification. Neither gasification nor pyrolysis are widely in use to treat sewage sludge. In Energies, a peer -reviewed scientific journal, the authors of a 2018 paper titled "A Review of Sludge -to -Energy Recovery Methods" described combustion (incineration) as a "mature and well known technology," while the use of gasification was described as a technology "still at infancy stage." In their conclusion the authors wrote, "An interesting observation is the lack of data to accurately back the high efficiency of most pyrolysis and gasification systems as they fail to account for the energy -intensive pre-processing stage, which offsets a considerable fraction of the recovered energy and could lead to negative energy balance." The cost of the pyrolysis project was estimated at $24 million, but now staff concedes the project is much more costly. No one has been able to put a true cost on maintenance and operation of a gasification system for the City of Edmonds. Most of the material available promoting gasification or pyrolysis as the solution for treating sewage sludge comes from vendors selling the technology. Calling this a "green" and "carbon recovery" project is appealing, but it masks the fact that gasification would be an experiment with one of the City's basic utility needs. In addition to outside experts, the City Council should consult with the City of Anacortes, which in recent years faced the same capital need and chose to refurbish and replace its WWTP incinerator. I urge the City Council to take a step back before committing the residents of Edmonds to an unproven, emerging technology. To do otherwise is to irresponsibly task the residents of Edmonds with paying for an experiment that may prove a costly failure. While experiments can be exciting, the Council's goal should be to ensure the City of Edmonds has a reliable, cost-effective and efficient means of treating its sewage sludge. 5/25/20 Ken Reidy, Subject: Public Comment for May 26, 2020 City Council Meeting The November 2, 2009 City Council Agenda included the following item: 6:30 p.m. - Executive session regarding pending or threatened litigation. That is all the agenda said. There was no reference to a section of the RCW and there was no indication what the pending or threatened litigation related to. There was no chance any citizen could know what the so called pending or threatened litigation was about. An item of great importance to my family was also on the November 2, 2009 City Council agenda — the review of a Temporary Construction Easement reserved by Ordinance No. 3729. As such, I never suspected that the City Council would go into Executive Session the same evening related to an item already on the regular agenda. City Council did so. At 6:30 p.m., PRIOR to Calling the Council Meeting Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 10 Packet Pg. 12 5.1.a to Order and the Flag Salute, former Mayor Haakenson announced that the City Council would be meeting in Executive Session to receive legal advice regarding pending or threatened litigation. City Council can only go into Executive Session after a regular or special City Council Meeting has been called to Order. EXECUTIVE SESSION is not expressly defined in the Open Public Meetings Act, but the term is commonly understood to mean that part of a regular or special meeting of a governing body that is closed to the public. The November 2, 2009 Executive Session was NOT part of a regular or special meeting of a governing body. RCW 42.30.110(1) - Executive sessions, clearly states that: Nothing contained in this chapter may be construed to prevent a governing body from holding an executive session during a regular or special meeting. RCW 42.30.110(1) - Executive sessions, DOES NOT say that a governing body can hold an Executive Session outside of a regular or special meeting. Former Mayor Haakenson stated that the Executive Session was scheduled to last approximately 30 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room. Mayor Haakenson stated that "No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session". Something contrary to what was anticipated would occur — action would take place after a regular meeting of the City Council was Called to Order. Former Councilmember DJ Wilson walked out of Executive Session on November 2, 2009 and walked right over to me and told me that the Council had decided 6-1 to remove my item from the agenda. The November 2, 2009 City Council Meeting Minutes document that the Council did exactly that right after the City Council meeting was Called to Order and opened with the flag salute. Elected officials present at the illegal Executive Session held outside of a regular or special meeting of the City Council were: Mayor Haakenson, Councilmembers Orvis, Wambolt, Plunkett, Bernheim, Peterson, Olson and Wilson. Others present at the illegal Executive Session held outside of a regular or special meeting of the City Council were City Attorney Scott Snyder, Attorney Stephanie Croll (why was she there ???), and City Clerk Sandy Chase. At 7:00 p.m., Mayor Haakenson announced to the public that an additional 15 minutes would be needed in Executive Session. At 7:15 p.m., Mayor Haakenson again announced to the public that an additional 15 minutes would be needed in Executive Session. The Executive Session concluded at 7:25 p.m. 55 minutes of discussion in 2009 and the City of Edmonds has always refused to release the related Executive Session Meeting Minutes to the public. This is true despite the fact the City provided me a related memorandum that must include at least part of what was discussed in secret. Mr. Snyder's related email clearly stated that his memorandum was "For attachment to Council Minutes" yet the City is still claiming Attorney Client privilege for the related minutes. You talk about betrayal of the citizens and the citizens' right to remain informed under the Washington State Open Public Meetings Act adopted in 1971! Again - DJ Wilson walked out of Executive Session on November 2, 2009 and walked right over to me and told me that the Council had decided 6-1 to remove my item from the agenda. I was stunned — I had dozens of citizens coming to the meeting to support removing the illegal Temporary Construction Easement from my property. As the November 2, 2009 Executive Session was illegal, there was no regular or special meeting to reconvene after it ended at 7:25 p.m. The regular Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:29 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. Despite the fact that the pledge of allegiance includes the concept of liberty and justice for all — I believe the Council quickly washed its hands of that pledge to get down to carrying out the plan agreed to in the illegal Executive Session — discussions held in secret behind closed doors outside of a reqular or special City Council Meeting. The first item on the Agenda was to approve the agenda. Immediately, former Councilmember Ron Wambolt moved to remove the item of great importance to my family from the agenda. The related decision had obviously been held in Executive Session. There was no opportunity for the public to know what had been discussed or why the City Council was taking this Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 11 Packet Pg. 13 5.1.a action. There was no robust discussion — just a motion followed by a vote that I believe was done to make it look like the decision had actually been made in an Open Regular Meeting of City Council. My initial foolish belief was that the Council was just delaying this a week or two. I felt horrible as so many people planned on attending that evening's meeting to support my family. I went out in the hallway and greeted many of them as they arrived and told them my item had been postponed and they could go back home. Some people decided to stay and make public comment during audience comments. Those comments are documented in the November 2, 2009 City Council Meeting Minutes. Following is one example: Robert (& Judy) Custello, Edmonds, asked why the City Attorney gave advice regarding the easement through Mr. Reidy's property that made Mr. Reidy feel he did not receive due process. Noting he had heard that the Council was 6 -1 against hearing Mr. Reidy's concerns, he asked the Councilmember who was in favor to explain why. He voiced his support for the Reidy's. I believe that what took place that night was a travesty — a shameful display of horrible, unethical City government. Approximately 50-70 citizens attended the November 2, 2009 City Council Meeting to show support for this Reconsideration. That was a large number so it was obvious that this issue mattered to the public. We were unaware that in the day's preceding that meeting, former Mayor Gary Haakenson had been emailing City Council Members related to the Reconsideration Agenda Item. For example, Mr. Haakenson used his yahoo.com email address to email former City Councilmember Michael Plunkett on October 29, 2009 at 3:47 pm an email that included the following: "If he persists and puts it on the agenda, you may want to rally three other votes to remove it from the agenda on Tuesday night if you think its wise. Just trying to keep you in the loop as to what he is doing. Why he is doing it is beyond me but if he's working with Reidy .... it must be to get at you somehow." Five minutes later, at 3:52 pm, Haakenson emailed former City Councilmember Ron Wambolt an email that discussed placement of the Reconsideration item on the Agenda. Mr. Haakenson's email included the following: "Just a heads -up that DJ is up to something. I advised Plunkett because Reidy hates him and maybe that is why DJ is on it." The point of the Reconsideration request was to determine whether or not Ordinance No. 3729 was legal and just - consistent with the concept of liberty and justice for all ... it had nothing to do with a Mayor's opinion of who liked or disliked anybody. Citizens have very few options available to try and encourage the City to make things right, or at least better, after elected officials have taken improper, illegal action. I believe the citizen's best option is to request RECONSIDERATION of the action. This allows the prior action to be discussed and reconsidered openly, with what should be full transparency. It can save the City and its citizens enormous legal fees and time. I worked hard to get a Council Member to support RECONSIDERATION. Sadly, my efforts were apparently undermined after former Mayor Haakenson's advised Michael Plunkett to "rally three other votes to remove it from the agenda..." - along with whatever else was discussed secretly behind closed doors during the 55 minute illegal Executive Session on NOVEMBER 2, 2009. So you see — recordkeeping of Executive Session discussions is absolutely essential if a City wants to truly be open and transparent. Without a record of the discussions - citizens can be harmed in secret with no documentation. I hope Council reconsiders the poor, misguided decision to rescind Resolution 853 via Resolution 1360. Please address Resolution 1360 as soon as possible and consider improving upon the great practice established via Resolution 853. Resolution 853 was adopted as it was in the Public Interest. I hope the 2020 City Council will choose to improve upon the public interest promoted in Resolution No. 853 and make the related documentation of discussions in Executive Session an even stronger tool promoting justice for all citizens of Edmonds as well as a more open and transparent government. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 12 Packet Pg. 14 5.1.a 5/24/20 Michelle Dotsch, Incomplete public comment on formation of Liason Group or Task Force for local LTC facilities from May 19, 2020 1 had originally sent an email to both City Council and publiccomment(a)_edmondswa.gov on Tuesday, May 19, 2020. It was printed in the public comment section of the meeting minutes of May 19, 2020 but it was incomplete, as the forwarded original email to Mayor Nelson on April 28, 2020 was not included in the notes, as it was in the original email for public comment so I am including it here now as a correction. Here is the missing portion of that original email referenced that I wrote to Mayor Nelson dated April 28, 2020: To Mayor Mike Nelson, I have heard you say on many occasions, including your original emergency order, that our seniors are your biggest concern, as 1 in 4 residents in Edmonds are over the age of 65. It has been shown that the largest concern within those in that group who are the most susceptible to this Covid-19 virus, reside in the long-term care (LTC) facilities within Edmonds. I believe the idea of having a Task Force or Liaison Group to be formed to help these facilities within Edmonds would be of great help and lines up directly with your valid concerns you have expressed on multiple occasions about our vulnerable seniors. As I have had conversations with some in LTC facilities regarding their challenges and isolation in getting direction and assistance, I firmly believe that a group like this would serve such a valuable service for them and put Edmonds as a leader in this regard, especially since it hits so many in our community the most, whether they are the resident themselves or have family and friends within our community who are concerned they are being neglected in finding comprehensive solutions. I would be happy to volunteer my time and energies to help in this regard. I appreciate your leadership during this crisis and I hope to hear from you if this could be something you would be willing to look at seriously, as I do know those on the front lines in these facilities are looking for help. Here is a draft (also attached in Word format below) of why we should look seriously at having a need for a LTC Liaison Group or Task Force and what they can do to help :Idea for an Edmonds Liaison Group (or Task Force) to Assist with Covid-19 critical needs of our local LTC facilities in Edmonds: The goal: under the guidance of to provide local liaison assistance with our LTC facilities, which are at ground zero in the fight against Coronavirus, with government and private Covid-19 resources and solutions to provide unimpeded access to care for our local residents living in these facilities and the staff who treat them. Some of the current challenges for LTC facilities and their residents and staff: 1. Remove all state barriers to nurses testing staff, residents and incoming providers. As it is now for processing covid-19 tests, it requires an MD order and most LTC facilities that are not skilled nursing facilities have no MD on staff, therefore each individual Primary Care Provider is required to sign off on testing for each individual resident that is their patient. The delays associated with waiting for MD approval given multiple clinic closures and reduced staffing, delays ability of LTC facility to swiftly identify positive cases and remove possibly infected staff from scheduling to be isolated and prevent a spread within the facility. 2. Prioritize testing resources for all LTC facilities. Currently there is no direct resource available to receive testing media. Rapid tests need to be obtained for employees. Antibody testing for all residents and staff need help to be obtained prior to fully lifting facility quarantine procedures to mitigate ongoing risks of those not yet exposed.3. Outbreaks and deaths due to COVID-19 have occurred at nursing homes across the country, which house among the most vulnerable of high -risk individuals. As the numbers are showing, up to 50% or more of deaths due to the Covid-19 virus outbreak are from these LTC Facilities within America and Europe. Through difficulties in understanding this novel virus and how it infects humans, as this was never seen before, at the outset much was not known. We now know, after 2 months since the horrible outbreak at the LifeCare Center in Kirkland, that these LTC facilities are the most at risk for mortality and should be our highest priority to care for our most vulnerable seniors. 4. Since Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 13 Packet Pg. 15 5.1.a resources are unfortunately still in disarray, this Liaison Group will reach out to our local Edmonds LTC facilities, including group homes, assisted living, memory care facilities to inquire and coordinate efforts to relay the tenuous situation these facilities find themselves still in today, and work to assist them in direct communication with government and possibly private resources and leaders to keep them front and center in this fight to save our most vulnerable from this terrible virus.5. Since many of the staff and caregivers move often between multiple LTC facilities, these staff and outside caregivers need to have the reality of the situation be acknowledged to prevent the spread of Coronavirus between facilities, if they are carriers with no symptoms. Since we now know that some of these LTC workers could be a silent carrier, through no fault of their own, as staffing shortages are critical in the LTC industry they are needed on the front lines of these care facilities to care for our seniors, they need testing for antibodies, and if none, then they need constant quick result testing to be sure they are not a silent carrier. 6. As these LTC facilities are vital to the well-being of the mental and physical health of these residents, the sooner they can resume some safe socializing among residents and staff, the better the mental and physical health of these senior residents of Edmonds will be 7. As it is imperative to follow the current challenging process of obtaining available resources that are necessary for our most vulnerable senior residents living in Edmonds and their caregivers, this Liaison Group will work to continue contact with all those facilities in Edmonds until they come to a collective solution for ease of access to effective and consistent Covid-19 testing, including antibody testing when available, and proper PPE to allow for continuous safe care at all of our Edmonds LTC facilities. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to your virtual Town Hall this afternoon. 5/24/20 Ken Reidy, Subject: Public Comment for May 26, 2020 City Council Meeting I am providing the 2020 Edmonds City Council the following example of how Council can take action based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information provided to Council in the open. This example is found right in the May 10, 2016 Council Agenda Packet under: Discussion of Whether to Continue City's Practice of Taking Notes in Executive Session (20 min.) The Narrative provides the following false, misleadinq, inaccurate or incomplete information to City Council: So, councilmembers who are engaged appropriately in an executive session discussion that does involve the attorney - client privilege might have a false expectation that the notes would not be contemporaneously releasable. These councilmembers might be surprised when those notes are later released under the public records act. This is simply not true as there is no basis for a "false expectation" or later surprise. City of Edmonds Resolution No. 1150 makes it very clear that: 1.2 Executive Sessions: Prior to adjournment of an executive session, the Council shall, by consensus, determine what, if any, information may be released regarding the executive session. A discussion to release information shall be confirmed by voice motion in open session. The City Council can take action only in open session at a public meeting. In the absence of a motion and vote, no confidential information shall be released. In the event that, at a later date, the Mayor, Council President or a Council Member wishes to refer to or place information relating to executive session in the public record, the Mayor, on behalf of the Mayor or the staff or a Council Member, shall ask the Council President to place an item on an agenda for such a motion and vote. The Council Agenda item shall notify Council Members of the procedural issue to be discussed, but shall not itself release confidential information relating to the executive session. Hopefully the 2020 City Council has been following Resolution No. 1150. The following Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 14 Packet Pg. 16 5.1.a took place during the October 25, 2011 City Council meeting: 4. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION DISCUSSION COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO RELEASE PAGE 2 OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION NOTES FROM OCTOBER 18, 2005. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Please note - this took place over 6 years after the related meeting in Executive Session was held. Clearly, under Resolution 1150 there can be no "false expectation" or later surprise. The July 17, 2007 City Council meeting minutes make also support this. Those minutes include the following: The intent of the resolution was to identify a way for the Council to reach a consensus regarding when to break the confidentially of an Executive Session. He noted the City kept minutes of Executive Session to satisfy the public at a future date that the Council discussed the appropriate issue. The resolution was intended to establish an orderly way to decide when Executive Session privilege ended. Please review the following 6 issues related to the 2016 City Council's efforts to halt actions deemed to be in the public interest via Resolution 853 adopted by the 1996 City Council. Issue #1: The information provided to City Council in the related City Council Agenda Packets was very incomplete. My requests to include directly related items in the Agenda Packet were not honored. Staff lead Jeff Taraday and Preparer Scott Passey did not even provide a full record of the related City Council Meeting Minutes (Minutes) for the 2016 City Council to review. Among the Minutes excluded were the critical August 6, 1996 Minutes as well as the June 5, 2007 Minutes which clearly disclose the Legislative intent behind Resolution 853. The June 5, 2007 Minutes discussed a litigation matter and former City Attorney Scott Snyder clearly represented to the citizens that once the process was concluded, all Executive Session minutes would be available to the public. Also curiously missing from the related City Council Agenda Items were the significant discussions documented in the October 2, 2012 Minutes. Those Minutes prove that the following Main Motion was passed: Motion #3 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MODIFY RESOLUTION 853 TO SPECIFY THAT WE WILL KEEP A RECORD IN THE FORM OF NOTES ON EXECUTIVE SESSIONS REGARDING LITIGATION ONLY. Vote on Motion #3 UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE MOTION CARRIED (4 -3), COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO, BLOOM, FRALEY - MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND YAMAMOTO VOTING NO. The Motion passed. Please note that 2016 City Council President Kristiana Johnson voted against that Motion. For some mysterious reason, Staff lead Jeff Taraday did not act on the City Council's passed Main Motion in 2012. This is obviously a problem and makes it even more alarming that the 2016 City Council Agenda Items did not include full disclosure of the October 2, 2012 Minutes. I also think the 2020 Council and the public should know exactly why the 2012 Council's direction was not acted upon. The provision of incomplete information to Council before Council's legislative deliberations is improper and highly problematic. Issue #2: The 2012 City Council was very detailed in its review of the same issue and determined that review was worthy of a Public Hearing. The 2012 Agenda Packet included the following information, almost all of which was left out of the 2016 Agenda Packets four years later: 6-5-2007 Approved Council Minutes 7-17-2007 Approved Council Minutes 2012 Council Retreat Minutes 3-20-12 Approved Council Minutes Resolution No. 853 Resolution 1150 6-12-2012 Public Safety/Personnel Committee Minutes 8-28-2012 Draft Council Minutes Mr. Nixon's Presentation 9-11-2012 Public Safety & Personnel Committee Minutes 9-18-2012 Draft Council Minutes Public Hearing Correspondence Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 15 Packet Pg. 17 5.1.a The 2016 City Council approached this very important topic much differently than the 2012 Council did. City Council President Kristiana Johnson is responsible for and paid extra to formulate and prepare the agenda for City Council Meetings. Despite her knowledge of the 2012 City Council actions - remember, she voted against the Main Motion that PASSED, she failed to provide the 2016 Council with more complete information in the Agenda Packet — even after related requests to do so were made. The information provided the 2016 Council could have been made much more complete merely by cutting and pasting the information found in the October 2, 2012 Agenda Packet. She also failed to promote a Public Hearing in 2016 which is much different than what was done in 2012. Why such arbitrary treatment and so much less opportunity for the public's voice to be heard in 2016? Issue #3: The 2016 City Council failed to consider or even mention Resolution No. 1150 leading up to its vote on June 7, 2016. Resolution No. 1150 was certainly considered during the related 2012 City Council process. Why not in 2016? The July 17, 2007 Minutes prove that Resolution No. 1150 was intended to establish an orderly way to decide when Executive Session Attorney - Client Privilege ended. City Attorney Jeff Taraday has represented that without an affirmative act to waive the attorney -client privilege on the part of the City Council, such notes would never be subject to disclosure. However, Resolution No. 1150 established an orderly way to decide when Executive Session Attorney -Client Privilege ended. Furthermore, actions of the 2011 City Council prove that, at a later date, citizens can request that information related to an Executive Session be released and placed in the public record. City Attorney Taraday knows that claimed attorney -client privilege related to Executive Session Meeting Minutes has been waived by City Council in the past. He was City Attorney and in attendance when it happened during the October 25, 2011 City Council Meetings as follows: 4. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION DISCUSSION COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO RELEASE PAGE 2 OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION NOTES FROM OCTOBER 18, 2005. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. City Attorney Taraday also knows that the attorney -client privilege is a narrow privilege and protects only "communications and advice between attorney and client;" it does not protect documents that are prepared for some other purpose than communicating with an attorney. Kammerer v. W. Gear Corp., 96 Wash.2d 416, 421, 635 P.2d 708 (1981). Thus, should an agency prepare a document for a purpose other than communicating with its attorney, and then claim that the document is protected by the attorney - client privilege, the requesting party might well claim that the agency has acted in bad faith. The 1996 City Council made it very clear what the purpose of the summary minutes was. That purpose was that the City Council found "it to be in the public interest to maintain summary minutes of executive session subject to release in accordance with the provisions of state law, if and when, the reason for the executive session expires." Issue #4: Councilmember Tom Meseros made the motion to rescind Resolution 853. In doing so he stated that the Council has created an "atmosphere" that there are minutes being kept. Mr. Mesaros failed to provide support for the so called "atmosphere". Mr. Mesaros also claimed that Council has given the public an impression that is "unreal". I strongly disagree and I think these comments show great disrespect to the public. I believe citizens are plenty smart enough to know exactly what the summary minutes are. What the summary minutes actually are has great value. Summary minutes of Executive Session are a tool that promotes more open government, which increases trust in City government. Councilmember Mesaros also stated that decisions are not made in Executive Session and that the public will have quite a bit of opportunity to come to know what is discussed. Again, I disagree. It is often the practice of the City Council to exit Executive Session and vote without discussing the related matter and without providing the public hardly any related information. Furthermore, Council has a practice Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 16 Packet Pg. 18 5.1.a of reaching consensus in Executive Session. The October 2, 2012 City Council Meeting minutes indicate Council reaches consensus in Executive Session by head nod and/or by discussion. Resolution 1150 even adopted policy requiring the City Council to reach a consensus prior to adjournment of Executive Session. Issue #5: In expressing support for the rescission of Resolution 853, Councilmember Dave Teitzel stated that the Council has an obligation to its citizens to analyze the cost/benefit and that it costs the City a great deal to take notes and archive them, time that could be spent responding to appropriate public records requests for example. I fear that the truth is that staff lead Jeff Taraday and preparer Scott Passey will now be paid the same to do less for the public interest. The 1996 City Council took action that made it clear that it was very appropriate to maintain summary minutes of executive session subject to release in accordance with the provisions of state law, if and when, the reason for the executive session expired. I think a strong argument can be made that documenting Executive Session discussions is very appropriate and can be of great value. Issue #6: On the evening of June 7, 2016, a motion was made to rescind Resolution No. 853, a Resolution to do something extra that the 1996 City Council had long ago decided was in the public interest. The 1996 City Council wanted to keep minutes of Executive Sessions even though State law did not require such. And keep minutes the City Council did, twenty years of actions related to Resolution No. 853. The 1996 City Council wanted those minutes to be subject to release if and when the reason for the Executive Session expires. This was a great legislative act, an act that strongly supported open government and transparency. But then along came the 2016 City Council, a Council that allowed a City Attorney and a City Clerk to lobby the Council to take action contrary to the public interest. I believe that motions to rescind can only be made if no action has taken place on the original motion. History shows that twenty years of actions related to Resolution 853 have taken place and many minutes have been released to the public. The 1996 motion has been executed and the minutes exist. The 2016 City Council cannot undo twenty years of actions and simply make a motion to rescind Resolution No. 853. Hence, the motion to rescind may have been out of order — and may not be an option available to the 2016 City Council. I believe the City Council will need to revisit the 2016 City Council's conduct that concluded with a vote the night of June 7, 2016 to "rescind" Resolution No. 853. In conclusion, I urge the City Council to act in the public interest rather than doing what the City Attorney and City Clerk desire. RCW 42.30.110, part of the State's Open Public Meetings Act seems like good policy, at least in theory. There could certainly be a public benefit in allowing governing body's to exclude the public from meetings to discuss the fourteen (14) items addressed in RCW 42.30.110. However, I believe those discussions can benefit the public good only if the City Council does not end up taking action based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate of incomplete information provided to Council in Executive Session. History shows that Council is sometimes misguided in Open Session and in Executive Session. I am happy to meet with each and every one of my eight elected officials and show you documents supporting this. When it happens in Open Session, there are at least approved City Council Meeting Minutes so that the public has a record of what was represented to City Council in Open Session. Without documentation of Executive Session discussions, the 2016 City Council is exposing citizens to harm based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate of incomplete information provided to Council in Executive Session - with no documentation of what Council is told behind closed doors. I believe this is unacceptable based on the knowledge of what has occurred in the past. I also believe that documentation provides a safeguard limiting the provision of false, misleading, inaccurate of incomplete information to Council. I believe documentation of Executive Session discussions helps discourage this conduct, something that is of great benefit to the public. I Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 17 Packet Pg. 19 5.1.a hope the 2020 City Council will choose to improve upon the public interest promoted in Resolution No. 853 and make the related documentation of discussions in Executive Session an even stronger tool promoting justice for all citizens of Edmonds as well as a more open and transparent government. Please note: Resolution No. 1150 is still in effect. Has the 2020 City Council been reaching consensus before exiting Executive Session Prior as to what, if any, information may be released regarding the Executive Session? For example, was such done prior to exiting Executive Session on May 15, 2020? The following is from Chris Hutchings, Montesano City Council:"In October, 2011, 1 sent an inquiry into Tim Ford, the Open Government Ombudsman, as our City Attorney had similar advice regarding RCW 42.23.070 (4), which I disagreed with. Tim Ford responded with the following: "RCW 42.23.070(4) does not apply to all matters discussed in executive session. Only that information made confidential by law. The executive session provisions do not create any express confidentiality for public records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. ACLU v. City of Seattle, 121 Wn. App. 544, 555 (2004). Nor do the executive session provisions create any confidentiality for discussions. You are still doing the public's business, even in an executive session." We should always remember the legislative declaration of the OPMA: "The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created." In conclusion, the executive session provisions do not create any confidentiality for discussions. As such, nobody could possibly have false expectations that Executive Session Meeting Minutes are not contemporaneously releasable. Especially in Edmonds where all know that the City Council passed Resolution 1150 in 2007 to establish an orderly way to decide when Executive Session privilege ended. Incredibly, Resolution 1150 was not included in the 2016 City Council Agenda Packets related to Resolution 853. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 26, 2020 Page 18 Packet Pg. 20 5.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #242318 through #242392 dated May 27, 2020 for $1,524,689.86 and wire payments of $13,403.82, $888.88 and $417.67. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 05-28-20 wire 05-21-20 wire 05-26-20 wire 05-28-20 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 05-28-20 Packet Pg. 21 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242318 5/27/2020 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 242319 5/27/2020 064615 AIR COMPRESSOR SERVICE 242320 5/27/2020 073573 ANIXTER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 31656 32929 49517 231<252606 242321 5/27/2020 076934 ANSELL HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS LLC 20903198 242322 5/27/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1991741190 PO # Description/Account MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 WWTP:5/19/20 PEST CONTROL SE Pest Control Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total WWTP: PO 297 SERVICE CALL FOF PO 297 SERVICE CALL FOR VES14 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total STORM - SUPPLIES/ GLOVES STORM - SUPPLIES/ GLOVES 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Total FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 5.2.a Page: 1 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 22 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 2 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242322 5/27/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5E (D 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.0, a 1991750026 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.5E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.0 � w 1991755027 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE t 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6- PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE o 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1- �a PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE o L 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1- 0- PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE Q 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1- c PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE N 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.Of N 10.4% Sales Tax c 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.1 � N 10.4% Sales Tax E 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6z 2 10.4% Sales Tax }; 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6z 10.4% Sales Tax E t 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6z 10.4% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6z 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.6- 1991755028 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT Page: 2 Packet Pg. 23 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242322 5/27/2020 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 242323 242324 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 1991758802 1991758803 5/27/2020 068245 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES INC 051938 PO # Description/Account FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 WWTP: 5/19/20 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 Total E4FE.TO 19-01.SERVICES THRU 4/; E4FE.TO 19-01.Services thru 4/27/2C 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 Total 5/27/2020 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0200677-IN WWTP:5/12/20 DIESEL FUEL ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (include 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 5.2.a Page: 3 Amoun 9.2E E �a a 19.1( L 3 0.9-, c �a 1.9E Y a� t 51.4E E 2.3- 0 5.3E 0 0.21 Q 0 56.5E C� 00 5.8E c 253.W E 2 U 1,484.8, 1,484.8: E t �a a WIc11-111 72.1 E Page: 3 Packet Pg. 24 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242324 5/27/2020 071124 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM (Continued) Total : 765.95 242325 5/27/2020 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 49468 INTERPRETER - 9Z1079981 E E INTERPRETER - 9Z1079981 �a 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 106.4< 51336 INTERPRETER - MOCK COURT RUI = INTERPRETER - MOCK COURT RUI 3 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( c 51412 INTERPRETER - XZ0030731 N INTERPRETER - XZ0030731 Y U 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 106.4< 51413 INTERPRETER - XZ0176833 INTERPRETER - XZ0176833 E 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 106.4< 51447 INTERPRETER - 9Z0891586 0 INTERPRETER - 9Z0891586 '@ 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 158.4z o Total: 577.7; a a 242326 5/27/2020 077554 BENTON, RENEE 2005115.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( Q REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( N 001.000.239.200 241.3( ao Total : 241.3( 0 242327 5/27/2020 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1179327 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 584.7 GAL FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 584.7 GAL E E 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 480.0" Z Total: 480.01 a� 242328 5/27/2020 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1065822 EOMA/EBFC/EBGA.PUBLISH PROJE E EOMA.Publish Project Online 332.000.64.594.76.41.00 91.71 EOMA.Publish Project Online Q 126.000.64.594.76.41.00 4.1 < EOMA.Publish Project Online 125.000.64.594.76.41.00 10.6( Page: 4 Packet Pg. 25 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 5 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242328 5/27/2020 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE (Continued) EBFC.Publish Project Online 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 49.2( EBGA.Publish Project Online 423.000.75.594.35.41.00 0.1 E Total: 155.8E 242329 5/27/2020 077166 CADENA, MICHAEL 03162020 INTERPRETER - 9Z0877800 INTERPRETER - 9Z0877800 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 105.2� 03182020 INTERPRETER - 9Z0915139 INTERPRETER - 9Z0915139 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 49710 INTERPRETER - 9Z1166164 INTERPRETER - 9Z1166164 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 105.1 E Total : 310.4E 242330 5/27/2020 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 1715326 STREET - SUPPLIES STREET - SUPPLIES 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 419.8E 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 32.7E Tota I : 452.6( 242331 5/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 21344238 CANNON APRIL 2020 CANNON APRIL 2020 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 59.5, 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 6.1 21457491 INV 21457491 - EDMONDS PD 5/20 - CONTRACT CHARGE-IR6255 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 151.8 , 4/20 - BW METER USAGE-IR6255 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 14.4� 5/20- CONTRACT CHARGE-IRC332,' Page: 5 Packet Pg. 26 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242331 5/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 6 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.7( 5D 4/20- BW METER USAGE-IRC33251 E 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 119.0E a 4/20- CLR METER USAGE-IRC33251 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 18.1, 3 5/20 - CONTRACT CHARGE-IRC524 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 160.0( 4/20 - BW METER USAGE-IRC5240) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 Y 17.1 4/20 - CLR METER USAGE-IRC5240 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 52.5z E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 _M 61.8( 21457492 CANNON MAY 2020 0 CANNON MAY 2020 �a 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 59.51 o 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 6.1 Q 21457494 CONTRACT/METER CHARGES c contract and meter usage charges N 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 650.7, N 10.4% Sales Tax c 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 67.6E w 21457495 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON E PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON 2 U 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 218.6, }; 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 22.7< E 21457501 P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 100.3z Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 10.4' 21457502 PARK MAINT IRC2501F COPIER COI Page: 6 Packet Pg. 27 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242331 5/27/2020 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 242332 5/27/2020 077353 CAPITOL CONSULTING LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 7 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi m 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 60.3, E 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 6.2£ 21457504 CONTRACT/METER CHARGES 3 contract and meter usage charges 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 15.5, 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 Y 1.6' U 21457505 COUNCIL CANON COPIER LEASE E Monthly contract charge E 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 B/W meter usage 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 0.3z o Color meter usage 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 1.0 1 o 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 2.8� Q 21457506 INV 21457506 - EDMONDS PD c 4/20- BW METER USAGE-IRC55501 N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 18.7' N 4/20- CLR METER USAGE-IRC5550 c 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 85.8( 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 30.1 � 2 5/20- CONTRACT CHARGE-IRC555( }; 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 185.7z 21457509 INV 21457509 - EDMONDS PD E 5/20 - CONTRACT CHARGE-FAXBO t 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.0, Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 3.7.' Total : 2,332.5 , 006 STATE LOBBYIST FOR MAY 2020 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 28 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242332 5/27/2020 077353 CAPITOL CONSULTING LLC (Continued) State Lobbyist for May 2020 001.000.61.511.70.41.00 3,750.0( E Total: 3,750.0( a 242333 5/27/2020 070088 CASCADIA CONSULTING GROUP 7289 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES L Consulting Services - Citizens' Housir 3 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 3,050.0( Total: 3,050.0( N Y V 242334 5/27/2020 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC XVB4705 CAMERAS FOR VIDEO CONFEREN Avermedia Live Streamer Cameras fc 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 171.4E . 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 17.& o Total: 189.25 242335 5/27/2020 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 8498310300732547 PUBLIC WORKS - DIGITAL CABLE o Public Works - 7110 210th S SW - a 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 1.9" Q Public Works - 7110 210th S SW - o 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 N 9.1 E ao Public Works - 7110 210th S SW - N 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 W) 9.1 � c Public Works - 7110 210th S SW - y E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 9.1E 'M Public Works - 7110 210th S SW - Z 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 8.8' Total: 38.25 t 242336 5/27/2020 063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 267884 SEWER - MANHOLE ADJUST RING ra SEWER - MANHOLE ADJUST RING Q 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 866.5z 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 90.11 Page: 8 Packet Pg. 29 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher 242336 242337 242339 Voucher List City of Edmonds Date Vendor Invoice 5/27/2020 063519 063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC (Continued) 5/27/2020 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1664 5/27/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION i[Ys1 3-01808 3-03575 3-07525 3-07709 3-09350 3-09800 3-29875 6-00025 PO # Description/Account Total PM SUPPLIES: YOST SUPPLIES PM SUPPLIES: YOST SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: DUCT TAPE, SPRAY PM SUPPLIES: DUCT TAPE, SPRAY 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 Total LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S' 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 MARINA BEACH PARK SPRINKLER 5.2.a Page: 9 Amoun 956.6E C m E �a 24.1, Q' a� L 2.5- c �a 16.9£ a� t 1.7, 45.4: E �a 0 M 57.4' o a a 557.8, Q 0 N 00 57.4< 0 N E 57.41 'M U c 107.6E t R 52.8E Q 52.8E Page: 9 Packet Pg. 30 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 10 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242339 5/27/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) MARINA BEACH PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 212.7, E 6-00200 FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS a FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 320.0E .3 6-00410 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPF BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPF 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 412.3, N 6-00475 ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS t 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 523.0( 6-01127 WWTP: 3/17-5/15/20 METER 2088: 3/17-5/15/20 200 2ND AVE S / METE 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 199.0E o 6-01130 WWTP: 3/17-5/15/20 METER 9439: �a 3/17-5/15/20 200 2ND AVE S / METE o L 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 24.3E a 6-01140 WWTP: 3/17-5/15/20 METER 50104E Q 3/17-5/15/20 200 2ND AVE S / METE .r 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 0 4,083.8z N 6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER 00 N CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER Wn 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 0 208.1 N 6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT E CITY PARK PARKING LOT 2 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 U 1,462.2, }; 6-01280 CITY PARK SPRAY PARK CITY PARK SPRAY PARK E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 309.2.E 6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL fd PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 344.8� 6-02727 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 303.5, Page: 10 Packet Pg. 31 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242339 5/27/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 11 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 6-02730 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 303.5, a 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,477.1, 6-02736 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH Ab �a FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH Ab 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 13.9- 6-02737 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / t FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,601.1 6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA p 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 330.& �a 6-02745 VETERANS PLAZA o VETERANS PLAZA a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 376.0� Q 6-02825 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / F _. SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,833.1 E N 6-02875 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF Wn FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 24.3< E 6-02885 DOWNTOWN RESTROOM 2 DOWNTOWN RESTROOM U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 336.2E 6-02900 FAC SPRINKLER E FAC SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 317.1, M 6-02925 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( Q FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,981.6, 6-03000 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI Page: 11 Packet Pg. 32 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 12 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242339 5/27/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 579.41 6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI E HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI ca 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 a 199.0E 6-03575 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER 3 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 362.5( 6-04127 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,040.3E 6-04128 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TI• EE FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TI• 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 13.9" Z 6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER p SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 303.5, o 6-04425 SEAVIEW PARK a SEAVIEW PARK Q' Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 612.8� .r 6-04450 SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER N SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER 00 N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 441.2E 6 6-05155 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; N PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 195.1( 2 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; U 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 741.3E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 741.3E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 741.3E Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 741.3( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 741.3E Page: 12 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 13 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242339 5/27/2020 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 6-05156 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 E 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 1.7z a PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 6.6( .3 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 6.6( PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 Y 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 6.6( PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 6.6( E PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 6.5E 6-06040 5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGF o 5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGF �a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 52.8E o 6-07775 MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER a Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 388.3' c 6-08500 YOST PARK SPRINKLER N YOST PARK SPRINKLER c00.i 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,450.7z c 6-08525 YOST POOL N YOST POOL E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 309.2E u Total : 28,633.1( }; c 242340 5/27/2020 069469 ENNIS-FLINT INC 245666 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ MAGNUM TO E TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ MAGNUM TO 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 586.5( Freight Q 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 17.1( 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 62.7, Page: 13 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 14 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242340 5/27/2020 069469 069469 ENNIS-FLINT INC (Continued) Total : 666.3� 242341 5/27/2020 077665 ERICSON, KATHERINE 2005118.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 168.0( Total : 168.0( 242342 5/27/2020 075673 FARMER, MARIA 04292020 INTERPRETER - XZ0329104 INTERPRETER - XZ0329104 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( 05082020 INTERPRETER - 9Z1001789 INTERPRETER - 9Z1001789 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 100.0( Total : 200.0( 242343 5/27/2020 077668 FRISK, DONNA 2005121.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 550.0( Tota I : 550.0( 242344 5/27/2020 075082 GOUDA INCORPORATED BID-INV-000886 BID/ED! BALANCE PAYMENT FOR 6 BID/Ed! balance of payment for 600 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 4,575.0( Total: 4,575.0( 242345 5/27/2020 012560 HACH COMPANY 11964534 WWTP: 5/19/20-5/18/21 HACH3954": 5/19/20-5/18/21 HACH395434 SERVI 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10,815.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1,124.7E Total : 11,939.71 242346 5/27/2020 074804 HARLES, JANINE 527287 PHOTOGRAPHY - MAY 2020 Photography for May 2020 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 200.0( Total : 200.0( Page: 14 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 15 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242347 5/27/2020 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 727850-1 PM SUPPLIES: GOGGLE FACE SHII PM SUPPLIES: GOGGLE FACE SHII (D 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 124.1 E E, 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.9" Total : L 137.0, '3 242348 5/27/2020 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3367276 INDOFF SUPPLIES MAY 2020 c INDOFF SUPPLIES MAY 2020 y 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 6.3£ 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 0.6E 3371303 DYMO CLEAR ADDRESS LABELS Dymo Clear Address labels E 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 11.9£ o 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 1.2E p Total: 20.21 a a Q 242349 5/27/2020 077669 INGRAM, OLIVIA 2005122.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: N 001.000.239.200 678.0( ao 2005123.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( N W) REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 212.0( E Total : 890.0( .M z 242350 5/27/2020 077390 ISHIGAKI USA LTD 1360 WWTP: PO 156 GEARBOX & MOTO PO 156 GEARBOX & MOTOR a) 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,536.3z t Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 494.4( Q Total : 2,030.7z 242351 5/27/2020 069080 KROHNE INC S01/98851 WWTP: PO 291 DIGITAL PH SENSO PO 291 DIGITAL PH SENSOR Page: 15 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 16 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242351 5/27/2020 069080 KROHNE INC (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 632.0( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 13.9E Total: 645.9° 242352 5/27/2020 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 05072020-02 INV 05072020-02 FLEET APRIL CAR UNIT 12 - CAR WASH 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 4.5� UNIT 332 - CAR WASH 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 4.5� 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 0.9E Total: 10.1d 242353 5/27/2020 076498 LAW OFFICE OF KATE MOGLIA PLLC 162 CONFLICT COUNSEL - XZ0186945 CONFLICT COUNSEL - XZ0186945 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 300.0( Total : 300.0( 242354 5/27/2020 075016 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING 4658215 LEMAY MARCH 2O20 LEMAY MARCH 2O20 001.000.23.512.50.49.00 34.5, Total : 34.5: 242355 5/27/2020 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER June Cigna JUNE CIGNA PREMIUMS June Cigna Premiums 811.000.231.550 13,340.9E Total: 13,340.9° 242356 5/27/2020 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 20458 expenses 04-20 REIMBURESEMENT FOR EXF 04-20 reimbursement for expenses - 1 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 64.9E May-2020 05-2020 LEGALS FEES 05-2020 Legal fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 49.883.0( Page: 16 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 242356 5/27/2020 073603 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC (Continued) 242357 5/27/2020 061900 MARC 0697559-IN 242358 5/27/2020 077662 MARSHALL, JANE 242359 5/27/2020 077664 MCJUNKIN, NANCY 242360 5/27/2020 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 242361 5/27/2020 077670 MORROW, SUSAN 242362 5/27/2020 074348 MOYLES, AINE 0697668-IN 2005113.009 2005117.009 Description/Account Total ; WWTP: PO 258 GEL HAND SANITIZ PO 258 GEL HAND SANITIZER (CO) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 WWTP: PO 288 SEWER SOLVENT PO 288 SEWER SOLVENT 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 325393 STREET - BAR & CHAIN STREET - BAR & CHAIN 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 Total 2005124.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total 2005111.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 5.2.a Page: 17 Amoun 49,947.9° r- m E �a 925.0( L 96.2 - c �a 1,420.0( a� t 147.6E 2,588.81 .� 0 0 400.0( C� 00 400.0( N W) 0 N E 75.0< U 160.0( 160.0( Page: 17 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242362 5/27/2020 074348 MOYLES, AINE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 242363 5/27/2020 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 5735315 242364 5/27/2020 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0578264-I N 242365 5/27/2020 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS N021531 242366 5/27/2020 075735 PACIFIC SECURITY PO # Description/Account REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS PM: CIVIC STADIUM PANELS 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total STORM - SUPPLIES/ ANTIFOG & O, STORM - SUPPLIES/ ANTIFOG & O,' 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Freight 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Total WWTP: PO 294 HOSE ASSYS, CRIB PO 294 HOSE ASSYS, CRIMP SLEE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total 31375 SECURITY MARCH 2O20 SECURITY MARCH 2O20 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 31696 SECURITY APRIL 2020 SECURITY APRIL 2020 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 Total 5.2.a Page: 18 Page: 18 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 19 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242367 5/27/2020 027450 PAWS APRIL 2020 APRIL 2020- EDMONDS PD 5 ANIMALS@ $205. EA -$115 RCLM (D 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 910.0( E Total: 910.0( a 242368 5/27/2020 069322 PETERSEN BROTHERS INC EOAA.Pmt 2 EOAA.PMT 2 & RETAINAGE RELEAr EOAA.Pmt 2 3 126.000.68.542.64.48.00 455.0( EOAA.Retainage Release y 126.000.223.400 3,178.1 Total : 3,633.1 242369 5/27/2020 064088 PROTECTION ONE 134053148 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL E ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12 f6 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 129.0E o 134053149 FIRE INSPECTION - CITY HALL '@ FIRE INSPECTION - CITY HALL 121 0 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 84.8f a 13421334 ALARM MONITORING - FS #16 =- Q ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 34.1, N 134241333 ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII ao ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I N W) 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 27.5E ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I E 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 134241335 ALARM MONITORING - FS #17 ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 78.3' E 134241336 ALARM MONITORING - HISTORICAI ALARM MONITORING - Historic Mus 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 116.9( Q 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 12.1 E 134241337 ALARM MONITORING - WWTP alarm monitoring - WWTP, 200 2nd A Page: 19 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 20 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242369 5/27/2020 064088 PROTECTION ONE (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 45.9,1 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 4.7E a 134241338 ALARM MONITORING - PUBIC SAFE ALARM MONITORING - public safety 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 112.5( 134241339 FIRE INSPECTION - HIST MUSEUM. Fire Inspection - FS #17, 275 6th Ave v, 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 55.4, Fire Inspection - Historical Museum, 1 t 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 35.0, Fire Inspection - Public Safety, 250 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 153.3, Total: 917.7: o 242370 5/27/2020 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( �a > 0 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( a 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,230.8� Q 200002411383 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 35.8, N 200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ,n OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON N 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 91.5< E 200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 2 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE U 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 77.7, 200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME E CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 106.6, +° 200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / Q FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 285.8, 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242370 5/27/2020 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 242371 242372 5/27/2020 077661 PURCELL, MAUREEN Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 200019895354 200020415911 200024711901 2005112.009 5/27/2020 077671 RAVAGO CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA 208931 5.2.a Page: 21 PO # Description/Account Amoun 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 146.5f SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN E SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN ca 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 a 66.8£ PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 3 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 17.0£ PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 64.9( u PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; t 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 64.9( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; M 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 64.9( PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; o 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 64.9( �a PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; o L 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 64.8£ 0- CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE Q CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 c 131.E1 N Total : 2,515.2( N W) REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: N REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( E 001.000.239.200 440.0( 2 Total: 440.0( U c WWTP: PO 287 WILSON CLAY PO 287 WILSON CLAY U 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 3,480.0( 2 Freight Q 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 491.5( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 413.01 Page: 21 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 22 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242372 5/27/2020 077671 077671 RAVAGO CHEMICALS NORTH AMER (Continued) Total : 4,384.51 242373 5/27/2020 068132 SHORELINE CONSTRUCTION CO ESJB.Pmt 11 ESJB.PMT 11 THRU 4/30/20 E E ESJB.Pmt 11 thru 4/30/20 �a 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 339,199.4; ESJB.Pmt 11 thru 4/30/20 = 422.000.72.594.31.65.20 26,654.8- E5JB.Pmt 11 thru 4/30/20 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 37,627.2, N Total: 403,481.51 a� 242374 5/27/2020 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 3054 REQUEST FOR EXPERT FUNDS - 9 REQUEST FOR EXPERT FUNDS - 9 E 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 14.0, Total: 14.0' o 242375 5/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202547 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- > PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- o 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.6( a 200260271 YOST POOL Q YOST POOL o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 770.3( c� 00 200348233 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W N TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W W) 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 36.0E 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 57.3 200398956 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; E 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 946.6- 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / Q LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 222.3£ 200611317 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V Page: 22 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242375 5/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 23 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 127.1 < 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON E OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 a 180.0, 200723021 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI 3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 27.2E 200739845 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH Y 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 17.7( t 200865202 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 61.5" Z 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � p LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 136.4, o 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P a LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P Q' Q 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 19.21 .r 201431244 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC N PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 00 N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.6( Wn 201441755 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME N TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 169.61 2 201551744 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN U SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / P 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,568.7z E 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME f° 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 37.9, Q 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 17.8� 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W Page: 23 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242375 5/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 24 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 30.5, E 201751476 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW a TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 41.1, 3 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 17.7z N 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW t 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 29.1( 201942489 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 85.3z o PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; �a 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 324.2E o PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH : L a 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 324.2E Q PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH : c 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 324.2f N PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; N 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 324.2E c PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ; N 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 324.2E . 202250627 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED �a U 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED }; 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.7z aa) 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME E TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 M 52.7, 202289450 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME Q TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 74.Z 202291662 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1, Page: 24 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 25 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242375 5/27/2020 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 5,307.9£ E 202439246 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER a CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,113.1- 3 202540647 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 �a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.6( 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW t 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 17.9£ 203097787 WWTP: 4/17-5/18/20 METER 10001� 200 2ND AVE S / METER 10001353£ 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 26,816.1 < o 203652151 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 �a FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 0 L 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 233.6£ a 204425847 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / Q LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / _. 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 0 75.0, N 220216386 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF 00 N PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF Wn 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 0 60.6< N 220547574 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 E TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 U 68.4E }; Total: 41,109.0E E 242376 5/27/2020 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2020-6321 INV 2020-6321 - EDMONDS PD 90 - BASE RATE @ $103.25 EA 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 9,292.5( Q 20 - BOOKINGS @ $126.97 EA 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 2,539.4( 17.5 MED SPEC HOUSING @ $59.3; 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 1,038.2£ Page: 25 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 242376 5/27/2020 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE (Continued) 242377 5/27/2020 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 76933 242378 5/27/2020 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE 20-028 242379 5/27/2020 077510 STEWART, KENDAHL 2005125.009 242380 5/27/2020 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 7443 242381 5/27/2020 066628 THE SUPPLY COMPANY LLC PO # Description/Account 9- MENTAL HEALTH @ $143.25EA 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 5.38- VIDEO CT HRS @ $199.29 EA 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 Total PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 ILLEGAL DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Total JUN-2020 FIRE SERVICES CONTRf Jun-2020 Fire Services Contract Payi 001.000.39.522.20.41.50 Total REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Total SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR MN Social media services for May 2020 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Total 00215894S FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 5.2.a Page: 26 Amoun m 1,289.2f E �a a 1,072.1 E L 15,231.61 '3 c �a 394.0( a� t 5.0( 399.0( 0 M 614,893.1 1 o 614,893.1 j a a Q 0 N 75.5( ao 75.5( N W) 0 N E 2 300.0( U 300.0( c a� E t 23.6z El 7.5( 3.2� Page: 26 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 27 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242381 5/27/2020 066628 THE SUPPLY COMPANY LLC (Continued) 01403899 FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES (INCORRI FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES (INCORRI E, 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 33.6( a CR201403899 FLEET - CREDIT INCORRECT TAX C FLEET - CREDIT INCORRECT TAX 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 -33.6( Total: 34.31 242382 5/27/2020 073310 UNISAFE INC 707906 WWTP:PO 283 NITRILE HD EXAM c PO 283 NITRILE HD EXAM GLOVE; 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 671.4( Total: 671.4( . �a 242383 5/27/2020 077666 VALADEZ, MOISES 2005119.009 REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: .- REFUND: RENTAL CANCELLATION: 001.000.239.200 Ta 400.0( > Total: 400.0( a a 242384 5/27/2020 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9854522233 C/A 671247844-00001 Q Cell Service Fac-Maint o 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 99.1 E C� 00 Cell Service-PD N 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 295.4' o Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 19.6 , 'E Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 19.6, Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.6, t Cell Service-PW Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 39.3z Q Cell Service-WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 19.6, Total : 512.55 Page: 27 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 28 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 242385 5/27/2020 077667 VILLAMARIN, SUSANA 2005120.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( (D 001.000.239.200 140.0( E Total: 140.0( a 242386 5/27/2020 066238 WASHINGTON TRACTOR 2088953 PM SUPPLIES: BUCKLE L PM SUPPLIES: BUCKLE 3 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 79.1 9.2% Sales Tax y 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.2£ Total : 86.4E 242387 5/27/2020 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 11748689 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES E FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES f6 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 469.3E o 10.4% Sales Tax '@ 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 48.8- o Total : 518.1( a a 242388 5/27/2020 077663 WELCH, NICOLE 2005114.009 REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( Q REFUND: CLASS CANCELLATION: ( o 001.000.239.200 N 84.0( ao Total : 84.0( N W) 0 242389 5/27/2020 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000042573 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES N TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES E 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 87.1 E U Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 c 8.8" 10.4% Sales Tax E t 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.9£ Total : 105.9E Q 242390 5/27/2020 077380 WG CLARK CONSTRUCTION CO E7MA.Pmt 3 E7MA.PMT 3 THRU 3/31/20 E7MA.Pmt 3 thru 3/31/20 332.000.64.594.76.65.00 110,347.0( Page: 28 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242390 5/27/2020 077380 WG CLARK CONSTRUCTION CO 242391 5/27/2020 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 242392 5/27/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) E7MA.Pmt 3 thru 3/31/20 126.000.64.594.76.65.00 E7MA.Pmt 3 thru 3/31/20 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 Total : 20-EDM0005 MAY-2020 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 Total 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC ALARM, FAX, 5.2.a Page: 29 Amoun 62,181.5� E �a a 93,431.9, L 265,960.6, '3 c �a 21,250.0( U 21,250.0( (D E 2 U 31.1, o �a 0 162.7' a a Q 302.1, " 0 N 0 19.8; ,W) 0 N 36.9( E 47.0, c a� E 87.3E �a a 36.2, 36.2 Page: 29 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 05/28/2020 7:18:36AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 242392 5/27/2020 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 74 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 74 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.a Page: 30 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 17.1, E PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' a 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 85.6, PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 3 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 71.9E PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' �a 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 71.9E Y PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 95.9z 425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE E CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 74.2( 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 0 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC �a 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 69.4� o 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL, a FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF a Q 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 139.9" o Total : 1,385.8° N 0 N Bank total : 1,524,689.8( W) 0 Total vouchers : 1,524,689.8E E 2 U Page: 30 Packet Pg. 51 al 5.2.b vchlist 05/22/2020 2:03:48PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui 5212020 5/21/2020 062693 US BANK 0824 US BANK - CRAIG c HAND SANITIZER SUPPLIES E 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 331.2( FACE MASKS a 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 58.4( .� THERMOMETERS 3 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 674.3E c FACE MASKS ca 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 550.4, HAND SANITIZER SUPPLIES t 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 662.4( u 1558 LOGMEIN, ZOOM, TENABLE, SNAG E ENOM - BulkRegister.com - 2 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 30.1' c Tenable - Nessus Professional '@ 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 2,417.7E o CDW-G - Logitech M325 USB Wirele a 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 115.6, Q ENOM - BulkRegister.com - 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 13.9E N Newegg.com - HXSJ 1080p HD Web( N 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 291.3E TechSmith - Snagit Government Muti- c 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 m 263.1E 3 Amazon - USB 3.0 Extension cable - r 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 15.8z Amazon - Adjustable tablet stand - Q1 E 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 59.5E U Zoom - Webinar 4/30/20 - 5/29/20 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 44.1 E Q Zoom - Standard Biz Annual - Qty 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 389.3E Zoom - Audio License Unlimited - Qty 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 116.8, Page: 1 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 05/22/2020 2:03:48PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 5212020 5/21/2020 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.b Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) -71 ui LogMeln GoToMyPC Corporate Servil 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 3,206.0, E 1937 FLEET CC - 05/06/2020 FISHERIES SUPPLIES - UNIT M-16 1 a 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 218.8E DALCO - UNIT 35 PARTS 3 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 104.8E ZORO TOOLS - FLEET PARTS `6 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 75.4E ANSELL - FLEET GLOVES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 343.1 , U UPS - UNIT 47 SHIPPING E 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 84.5� u GOOD TO GO - UNIT 89 TOLL FEES o 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 3.2E '@ AMAZON - KEY BOARD o 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 23.3z a AUTOZONE - UNIT 435 BATTERY Q- Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 514.9" AMAZON - E175PO RUBBER BED IV N 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 107.5E N AMAZON - E155SO CAMLOCK DUS' 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 21.9z AMAZON - FLEET BATTERY L 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 9 8z 3 AMAZON - E155SO PARTS c 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 20.8( E AMAZON - FLEET BATTERY U 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 15.4z +° ANSELL - FLEET GLOVES Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 343.1 6654 SULLIVAN CC - 05/06/2020 ETSY - COVID FACE MASKS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 22.Of Page: 2 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 05/22/2020 2:03:48PM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 5212020 5/21/2020 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.2.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) -71 ui DONNA STUART - COVID FACE MA, 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2,208.0( E QFC - COVID BAGS FOR DELIVEM 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 9.9" DONNA STUART - COVID FACE MA; 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 35.9, 3 Total: 13,403.8, �a Bank total : 13,403.8: Y U a) Total vouchers : 13,403.8: U E 2 U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q a 0 N N LO O d L 3 r c m E M U �a a Page: 3 Packet Pg. 54 5.2.c vchlist 05/27/2020 8:14:20AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 5262020 5/26/2020 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui 0881 UTM MARCH 2O20 CC STMT c JURY PIZZA- E 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 48.3 1 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPLES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 27.6- .i OFFICE SUPPLIES BEST BUY 3 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 103.5" c OFFICE SUPPLIES BEST BUY - COI 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 125.3< 0881 UTM APRIL 2020 CC STMT aD t OFFICE SUPPLIES - AMAZON U 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 38.4� . OFFICE SUPPLIES - AMASON 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 127.3 c 9644 OXG APRIL 2020 CC STMT 'R MRT ADVANCE ONLINE TRAINING / o 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 418.2( a Total : 888.8f Q Bank total : 888.81 N Total vouchers : to 888.8f N LO 0 m L 3 r c m E U fC Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 55 5.2.d vchlist 05/28/2020 8:12:58AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 5282020 5/28/2020 076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui June 2020 ACCT #00397358 4TH AVE PARKIN( c 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - June 2 E E 001.000.39.542.64.45.00 417.E Total : 417.61 a a� L Bank total : 417.61 3 Total vouchers : 417.6 M U a� t U E 2 U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q a 0 N 00 N LC1 O 0) L 3 r c m E U �a a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 56 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC vi WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC E STR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB R Q- m STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA L 3 STR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project (Phase 7) c516 EBGA Y STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC aa) t WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA U E STR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD o UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB O Q g: WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement (Phase10) c498 E7JA Q STR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA c N STR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA N STR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB c N STR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA am STR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC E STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB Z 0 L STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB d STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC CD uJ STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC >' c STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB a STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA u_ STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA c STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA CD E t STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC U ns STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD r Q STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA STR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 57 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Fundinq Project Title Number Number STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s0l l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA vi c a� E R a m L �3 c N Y V m t U E 4- 0 0 L a a ZA Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 58 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAC� 048 2020 Traffic Calming STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program Pedestrian Task Force 1111011 STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project qV STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 2 Annual Storm 6 Q+ LReplacemmmoject SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project Phase nnual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) Civic Center Playfield (Design) GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR ElDA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Project STM E41FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System Bikelink Projec STR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Seaview Park Infiltration Facilit SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalizatio STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STM E6FD Stormwater Comp Plan Update SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 59 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR E6J13 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements vi STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall a� STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization Q. m STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW 3 STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement y PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) y t PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) U E PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STIR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive v — STIR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th a STIR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps Q STIR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps o N STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study ao N STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project i m SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project E WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement Z 0 UTILITIES E8JB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update a PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor CD rn STIR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming >+ STIR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install r STIR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study L STIR HAD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades u_ STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program E WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay v STIR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing Q STIR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program STIR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 60 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM EBMA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) vi STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab R Q- m WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring L 3 STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Y STIR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System aa) t WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating U E STIR ESDA c474 Bikelink Project v STIR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector 0 STM ESFD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility > 0 WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications a a WTR ESJB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Q STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) N SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II N SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c N L WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW z PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) o L WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement FAC E9MA c502 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South CD SWR EBGA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM EBFB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements a WTR EBJA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement Li STM EBFC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project m PRK EOMA c536 Civic Center Playfield (Design) E t PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) U STM EOFA c546 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 r r Q STM EOFB c547 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project SWR EOGA c548 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project WTR EOJA c549 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project PRK EOMA c551 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 61 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall vi STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive E STR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements R Q- m STR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th L 3 STR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program Y STR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming U E STR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing o STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program > 0 STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program Q WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay Q STR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) N STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades N STR EOAA i046 2020 Guardrail Installations c N L STR EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR EOAC i048 2020 Traffic Calming z STR EODB i049 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program o L STR EODC i050 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) CD PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization a UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates Li SW R ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study m STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E t STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update U STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study r r Q UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design STR EODA s024 2020 Pedestrian Task Force GF EONA s025 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 62 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c502 E9MA GF Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update s025 EONA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Construction) c551 EOMA PRK Civic Center Playfield (Design) c536 EOMA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E91FA STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project c547 EOFB STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 c546 EOFA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 HAD STIR 2020 Guardrail Installations i046 EOAA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program i049 EODB STIR 2020 Pedestrian Task Force s024 EODA STIR 2020 Traffic Calming i048 EOAC STIR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades i047 EOAB STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB ZA Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 63 5.2.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 ESDA STIR Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project i050 EODC STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 ESDB STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 ESAA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th) i044 E9DC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l ESGB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project c548 EOGA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02O EBJB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo ESNA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 ESJB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 ESKA WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project c549 EOJA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 ESHA vi c a� E R a m L �3 c N Y V m t U E 4- 0 0 L a a ZA Revised 5/27/2020 Packet Pg. 64 5.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Acknowledge receipts of Claims for Damages from Carl Stout, Gabriel Marcu and Carole Joy Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead} Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History n/a Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of claims from Carl Stout, Gabriel Marcu and Carole Joy by minute entry. Narrative Carl Stout 22009 100 Ave W, Edmonds WA 98020 $464.46 Gabriel Marcu 41617 160th PI SW, Lynnwood WA 98087 $840.63 Carole Joy 23039 75th PI Edmonds WA $101.17 Attachments: Marcu, Gabriel - Claim for Damages - for council CFD - Carl Stout - for council Carole_Joy_Claim_form Packet Pg. 65 REC1.' IV Claim for Damages Form Far Official Use Only Received from Claimant Information Claimant's name;1!9,4]B t-7 CL Date of Birth:_ [� Current residential address: �I �tD a _ P ei:� f �_ I Wed L�- A 3eov N Mailing address (if different): ev E cc Residential address at the time of the incident (if different from current address): L O Claimant's daytime phone number (work, home or cell) V Claimant's email address-_ r C Incident Information / p Date of the incident: 01119 2620 Time: am p > �C d If the incident occurred over a period of time, date of first and last occurrences: - U c From: To: 0 Location of incident; . LU a � V Name, addresses and telephone numbers of all persons involved in or witness to this incident: Name of all of our employees having knowledge of this incident: hAR_Ay eP_�I-tAL w_ ,AK-T1+ui_ IskK"Ei � 1/17 w�,W_ r Name, addresses and telephone numbers of all individuals not already identified above that have knowledge regarding the issues involved in this incident or knowledge of the claimant's resulting damages. Please include a brief description as to the nature and extent of each person's knowledge. Attach additional sheets if necessary. Packet Pg. 66 5.3.a Describe the cause of the injury or damages. Explain the extent of the property loss or medical, physical or mental injuries. Attach additional sheets if necessary. Has this incident been reported to law enforcement? if so, which agency and name of officer (if known}- Have you filed a claim with your insura nce carrier? If so, what is their name, phone number and claim number? E L O 4- Name address and telephone numbers of treating medical providers. Please attach billings and records if N available. E Please attach any other documentation that you believe support your claim's allegations 'Additional Information Required for Automobile Claims Only* License Plate A Driver Marne, r Owner Name, Passenger(s) , 4OL Q d4peju 1 am claiming damages in the amount of Lid tl r �t'r 1 f SPA T li�IGI p 11 auou roi daclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington the foregoing is trud and correct. This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written powerof attorney from the Claimant. by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf or by a court - approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. �2'i"Jl tl�oLkk", i9S �1J' C❑�—n Signature of Claimant Date (if notarized, for notary to complete) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that U'l617+* ire 1 NL (7 [CtA is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument_ Rated: og-o Signature: Title:Public My appointment expires: FJAMES lic ington IN208160 F-XPIRES23 Packet Pg. 67 CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVE 5.3.b mAY In 2029 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM7ROceivedbyr Date Claim F L S rJ� who currently resides at Please take note that �f d Ad � �1 Q/17 d mailing address �� ,# yG/ and who resided at home phone #q work phone claiming damages at the time of the occurrence and arising ng out fse date of birth following circumstances listed below. against �� r d��''�� in the sum of $ +� Zd Zd TIME: � d DATE OF OCCURRENCE: ��� u0-0 4 a LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE:v -7 % DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the Div C (,PP rn oy.eta - 2_ Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to th—e�foccurrJe�nce i/f]cl or damage. Also describe the injury or damage .•,.,� r� ) r i (attach an extra sheet for additional info uding names, addresses, and phone numbers. _ r 12� 'r, ., Q 3-1 r, sQd IC2 L 3, Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? _ZNo If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy M * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS UNIT License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: _ Phone#: Phone#: _ r 0 n, if needed) Passengers: Name: Name: _ Address: Address: — — — — Form Revised 05/06/ 14 Page I of 2 m E C 0 E U Packet Pg. 68 * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * 5.3.b DAM) I � eA being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above ove claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledgethat described; that I have read the ab information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subje o isclo e x Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of is the person who appeared before me, and said I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and y m purposes mentioned in the instrument. a) M E Dated: L O U) Signature E .2 Title v My appointment expires: Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 05/06/ 14 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 69 5.3.c CITY OF EDMOND CIJAJ 1 M FOR DAMAGES E FORM Dale Claim Form Flowived try City PI r�#e inal � 7who c u nwirTtly resides a malting addreaE c ; h pClorl ,prk phom f and who resided al. at the time rrf i1w amour nce aN whow c 4t t irth dq is {%aiming damage~ against in the sum of S . 1 arising OU10t the tobwing cim znsanoes listed belay. DATE CIF 1)0rl.J RREH0E � TIME: _ LOCATION OF OCCUR AFINCE: VU RIPTA0N 1 �,• Dgsmibe the cand= .3. 4. C :ir0umwance that Wo hl :dam'11WI th q ry of C descTitaa iri ury C i1 C� 1 41 en eAra %heat la addhiunaI infornkTkm, i14wod dj Promag a IRst of wo-essas, if applicable, w the eccuftlR a indtdding n8m", addresses. and phone number& Altach copies al all docurrn oration relating W expenses, injuries, lasses, endfor esti-nales iur ropait. y L-sy—'Nc Have you submined a idaim iur damages W y4ur wmrance fx mpanyr? If so, please provide the name of the insurawe co npar'y: anO the polk_y v: -- ADDITIONAL INFORM ATI ON REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY • . Lkvlse Puft A _ Ddvcr Licapsc, # T}pB Auto. sh3' [model] DRIVER: OWNEFI AdCJrcSS. _ Addnass: Pflorl#. Phan. - PPaeeangera: Name' -- -- N2mw: Address: -- - Addrese= - -- _—• _ Fags L of 2 N as cu 0 0 W E U E L 0 4- I E CU U I 0 �I a� 0 L U c aD E 0 M r r Q Packet Pg. 70 5.3.c NOTE; T Hl3 FOR M M UST BE SIC3 N Ea AN d N CTA-ILZED . I. _... being first dLdy sworn. deMw ar O say tW' I am the claima" for iho abov-E described; tt4w I have rewd tho above claim, 05W the wrrkent% lhered and believe the some 46 M Lriue. I lurlhet acknowlervje MW sny information I pa)Aae a� past crf this claim may be oansidered a public r rd ancL MaV tx- sut*,�cl to disclosure pursuant No RCW 42.58. Signature of L;aimantfa State of Washinglor, C� QUnty i)t I certrfy that I know yr have satisiacbry cw:denee that � _ is ilia mrson who appeared heiare me, and raid paracan acknowlc e l That;t*;shel Wned this irar ifnem and tu.;hllowled j A fo W (hishaer) freG and volufir'{ 'or kil vk�-5 ti° i pvrpogez merit oned in the instrument. Signature ,rile toy appointrrar:,nt expires: Please present Ina ownpkkl d clalm dorm to I•artn KeLLsed tL%1 G'L 1 City Clerk's Qffcme City of Edmonds 121 gh Avenue North E-dmonm, VGA, 980M d:00 a.m. to 430 p.m. Pam-t2ot2 a� E CU 0 L O N E M U E L O 4- I E CU U I O �I a� 0 L U c O E t v O r r Q Packet Pg. 71 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The Governor's recent OPMA proclamation has limited the types of action that city councils can take during this time of what the Governor considers to be limited transparency. Those actions must fall in one of two categories: 1) those that are necessary and routine city council actions; and 2) those that are necessary to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak. Necessary: A new Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) are scheduled to become effective June 19, 2020. The City of Edmonds must revise and adopt compliant regulations prior to this date. Failure to adopt the FIS and FIRM through revision of local regulations will result in immediate suspension from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). FEMA has stated it does not have the authority to postpone the effective dates of the maps in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. These dates are set by legislation and federal regulation that require a community to adopt the new FIS and accompanying FIRM within six (6) months of the issuance of the Letter of Final Determination. FEMA encourages communities to find whatever flexibility is available in their process to ensure that the FIS and FIRM are adopted on time to avoid the difficulties of suspension. Routine: The City typically has adopted code changes when needed to comply with federal requirements. The proposed update is not a significant policy change over current practice. Staff Recommendation Adopt the Interim Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance as provided in Exhibit 6. Narrative Introduction Development within the City of Edmonds floodplains are regulated by the City's critical area regulations (Chapter 23.70 ECDC - Frequently Flooded Areas) and building code regulations in Title 19. Chapter 23.70 ECDC primarily points to and relies upon the building code for the substantive floodplain development regulations. New FEMA floodplain maps are becoming effective on June 19, 2020 and for the City of Edmonds to remain a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, the City must update its floodplain regulations (Exhibit 1). In order to comply with this requirement, staff is proposing to establish a new Flood Damage Prevention Chapter 19.07 ECDC within the building code (Exhibit 2). ECDC 23.70.010 is being updated only to reference the new floodplain maps (Exhibit 3). National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Background The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is a voluntary Federal program that enables property Packet Pg. 72 7.1 owners in participating communities to purchase insurance protection against losses from flooding. This insurance is designed to provide an insurance alternative to disaster assistance to meet the escalating costs of repairing damage to buildings and their contents caused by floods. Participation in the NFIP is based on an agreement between local communities and the Federal Government. If a community adopts and enforces floodplain management regulations to reduce future flood risks to new construction and substantially improved structures in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the Federal Government will make flood insurance available within the community as a financial protection against flood losses. The community's floodplain management regulations must meet or exceed criteria established in accordance with Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 60.3, Criteria for land Management and Use. SFHAs are delineated on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS). To provide a national standard without regional discrimination, the 1% annual chance (100-year) flood has been adopted by FEMA as the base flood for floodplain management purposes. Flood Insurance Rate Map Update The City of Edmonds has limited areas within the 100-year flood plains. The flood plain areas are primarily around the Edmonds Marsh, Lake Ballinger, and the mouth of Shell Creek as well as some minor areas along the north Edmonds shoreline. The old FIRM maps (Exhibit 4) were adopted in 1999. Over the last several years, FEMA has been studying Snohomish County flood prone areas to update the FIRM maps. The updated FIRM maps for Edmonds jurisdiction are included as Exhibit 5. The largest change in the Edmonds flood plain is in the waterfront area and the State Route 104/Dayton Street area. Under the old FIRM maps, the flood plain was largely confined to the Edmonds Marsh and along the shoreline. With the updated FIRM maps, the flood plain would expand to cover much of the waterfront area including Harbor Square and portions of the Salish Crossing site. On the updated FIRM maps, the extent of the flood plain along Shell Creek would shrink to just the mouth of Shell Creek. There would be no change in the flood plain in the City of Edmonds' jurisdiction around Lake Ballinger. Chapter 19.07 ECDC - Flood Damage Prevention The new Chapter 19.07 ECDC consolidates the City's floodplain building code regulations in a single chapter, where currently they are spread over three separate chapters with the building code. In addition to consolidating existing building code, Chapter 19.07 ECDC includes new sections from the state model floodplain ordinance. Each section in the draft Chapter 19.07 ECDC identifies where the language is drawn from. Next Steps Given that an updated flood damage prevention ordinance must be adopted and effective by June 19tn in order for the City to remain in the National Flood Insurance Program and current restrictions on the OPMA due to the COVID-19 pandemic, an interim ordinance is being proposed for Council adoption tonight. Once restrictions on the OPMA are lifted and the standard ordinance review process, including public hearings, can resume, the interim ordinance will be run through the process as a non -interim ordinance and brought back to the Council for consideration as a permanent ordinance. Attachments: Exhibit 1: FEMA Letter regarding National Flood Insurance Program Exhibit 2: DRAFT Chapter 19.07 ECDC Flood Damage Prevention Exhibit 3: Draft Amendments to ECDC 23.70.010 Exihibt 4: Old Flood Insurance Rate Maps (floodplain maps) Exhibit 5: Updated Flood Insurance Rate Maps (floodplain maps) Exhibit 6: DRAFT Flood Damage Prevention Interim Ordinance Packet Pg. 73 U.S. Department of Homeland SecjW 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472 q o FEMA March 16, 2020 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable Mike Nelson Mayor, City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North, Third Floor Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mayor Nelson: I commend you for the efforts that have been put forth in implementing the floodplain management measures for the City of Edmonds, Washington, to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). As you implement these measures, I want to emphasize the following: a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) have been completed for your community; the FIS and FIRM will become effective on June 19, 2020; and by the FIS and FIRM effective date, the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Regional Office is required to approve the legally enforceable floodplain management measures your community adopts in accordance with Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations Section 60.3(e). As noted in FEMA's letter dated December 19, 2019, no significant changes have been made to the flood hazard data on the Preliminary and/or revised Preliminary copies of the FIRM for Snohomish County. Therefore, the City of Edmonds should use the Preliminary and/or revised Preliminary copies of the FIRM as the basis for adopting the required floodplain management measures. Final printed copies of the FIRM for the City of Edmonds will be sent to you within the next few months. If you encounter difficulties in enacting the measures, I recommend you contact the Floodplain Management Program at Washington Department of Ecology. You may contact David Radabaugh, CFM, the NFIP State Coordinator, by telephone at (425) 649-4260, in writing at 3190 160th Avenue, Southeast, Bellevue, Washington 98008, or by electronic mail at david.radabaugh@ecy.wa.gov. The FEMA Regional staff in Bothell, Washington, is also available to provide technical assistance and guidance in the development of floodplain management measures. The adoption of compliant floodplain management measures will provide protection for the City of Edmonds and will ensure its participation in the NFIP. The Regional Office may be contacted by telephone at (425) 487-4600 or in writing. Please send your written inquiries to the Director, Mitigation Division, FEMA Region X, www.fema.gov Packet Pg. 74 7.1.a The Honorable Mike Nelson March 16, 2020 Page 2 at 130 - 228th Street, Southwest, Bothell, Washington 98021-8627. The NFIP State Coordinating Office for your State has verified that Washington communities may include language in their floodplain management measures that automatically adopt the most recently available flood elevation data provided by FEMA. Your community's floodplain management measures may already be sufficient if the measures include suitable automatic adoption language and are otherwise in accordance with the minimum requirements of the NFIP. The NFIP State Coordinator can assist you further in clarifying questions you may have about automatic adoption. You may have already contacted the NFIP State Coordinator and/or the FEMA Regional Office, and may be in the final adoption process or recently adopted the appropriate measures. However, in the event your community has not adopted the appropriate measures, this letter is FEMA's official notification that you only have until June 19, 2020, to adopt and/or submit a floodplain management ordinance that meets or exceeds the minimum NFIP requirements, and request approval from the FEMA Regional Office by the effective date. Your community's adopted measures will be reviewed upon receipt and the FEMA Regional Office will notify you when the measures are approved. I appreciate your cooperation to ensure that your community's floodplain management measures are approved by the FEMA Regional Office by June 19, 2020. Your compliance with these mandatory program requirements will enable your community to avoid suspension from the NFIP. Sincerely, top Rachel Sears, Director Floodplain Management Division Mitigation Directorate I FEMA cc: Mike O'Hare, Regional Administrator, FEMA Region X David Radabaugh, CFM, NFIP State Coordinator, Washington Department of Ecology Leif Bjorback, Building Official, City of Edmonds Packet Pg. 75 Chapter 19.07 FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION 19.07.000 Purpose 19.07.010 Applicability 19.07.020 Definitions 19.07.030 International Building Code section amendments 19.07.040 International Residential Code section amendments 19.07.050 Habitat Assessment 19.07.060 Review of Building Permits 19.07.070 Anchoring 19.07.080 Subdivision Proposals and Development 19.07.090 Manufactured Homes 19.07.100 All Other Building Standards apply 19.07.010 Purpose (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; reduce the annual cost of flood insurance; and minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: A. Protect human life and health; B. Minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; C. Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; D. Minimize prolonged business interruptions; E. Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities, such as water and gas mains; electric, telephone, and sewer lines; and streets and bridges located in flood hazard areas; F. Help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of flood hazard areas so as to minimize blight areas caused by flooding; G. Notify potential buyers that the property is in a Special Flood Hazard Area; H. Notify those who occupy flood hazard areas that they assume responsibility for their actions; and I. Participate in and maintain eligibility for flood insurance and disaster relief. 19.07.010 Applicability (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) A. Lands to which the chapter applies. This chapter shall apply to all special flood hazard areas within the boundaries of the City of Edmonds. B. Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard. The special flood hazard areas identified by the Federal Insurance Administrator in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Snohomish County, Washington, and Incorporated Areas" dated June 19, 2020, and any revisions thereto, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and any Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 76 revisions thereto, are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The FIS and the FIRM are on file at the Development Services Department at 121 5ch Avenue North. The best available information for flood hazard area identification as outlined in Section G103.3 shall be the basis for regulation until a new FIRM is issued that incorporates data utilized under Section G 103.3. 19.07.020 Definitions (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) The following definitions apply to this chapter... A. Alteration of Watercourse: Any action that will change the location of the channel occupied by water within the banks of any portion of a riverine waterbody. B. Area of special flood hazard: The land in the floodplain within a community subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. It is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as zone A, AO, AH, Al-30, AE, A99, AR (V, VO, V1-30, VE). "Special flood hazard area" is synonymous in meaning with the phrase "area of special flood hazard". C. Base flood: The flood having a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (also referred to as the "100-year flood"). D. Base Flood Elevation (BFE): the elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise during the base flood. E. Coastal High Hazard Area: An area of special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary frontal dune along an open coast and any other area subject to high velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources. The area is designated on the FIRM as zone V1-30, VE or V. F. Development: Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials located within the area of special flood hazard. G. Elevation Certificate: An administrative tool of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that can be used to provide elevation information, to determine the proper insurance premium rate, and to support a request for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision based on fill (LOM R-F). H. Flood or Flooding: A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from: a. The overflow of inland or tidal waters. b. The unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. c. Mudslides (i.e., mudflows) which are proximately caused by flooding as defined in paragraph (1)(b) of this definition and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of water and deposited along the path of the current. The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 77 accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in paragraph (1)(a) of this definition. I. Flood elevation study: An examination, evaluation and determination of flood hazards and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination, evaluation and determination of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or flood -related erosion hazards. Also known as a Flood Insurance Study (FIS). J. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): The official map of a community, on which the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM). K. Floodplain or flood -prone area: Any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source. See "Flood or flooding." L. Floodplain administrator: The community official designated by title to administer and enforce the floodplain management regulations. M. Floodplain management regulations: Zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as floodplain ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance) and other application of police power. The term describes such state or local regulations, in any combination thereof, which provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and reduction. N. Flood proofing: Any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate risk of flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures, and their contents. Flood proofed structures are those that have the structural integrity and design to be impervious to floodwater below the Base Flood Elevation. O. Habitat Assessment: A written document that describes a project, identifies and analyzes the project's impacts to habitat for species discussed in the "Endangered Species Act — Section 7 Consultation Final Biological Opinion and Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for the Implementation of the National Flood Insurance Program in the State of Washington, Phase One Document — Puget Sound Region," and provides an Effects Determination. Highest adjacent grade: The highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. Q. Historic structure: Any structure that is: 1. Listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register; 2. Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district; 3. Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of Interior; or Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 78 4. Individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either: a. By an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, or b. Directly by the Secretary of the Interior in states without approved programs. Mean Sea Level: For purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the vertical datum to which Base Flood Elevations shown on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. New construction: For the purposes of determining insurance rates, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of an initial Flood Insurance Rate Map or after December 31, 1974, whichever is later, and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. For floodplain management purposes, "new construction" means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. T. Structure: For floodplain management purposes, a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. 19.07.030 International Building Code section amendments (From 19.00.025) The following sections of the IBC are hereby amended as follows: A. Section 110.3.3, Lowest floor elevation, is amended to read: In flood hazard areas, upon placement of the lowest floor, including the basement, and prior to further vertical construction, the elevation certification required in Section 1612.5 shall be submitted to the building official. Prior to final inspection approval, the building official shall require an elevation certificate based on finished construction prepared and sealed by a State li-censed land surveyor. B. Section 1612.1.1, Residential Structures, is added and reads: Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within designated floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure which do not increase the ground floor area; and (ii) repairs, reconstruction or improvements to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic places, may be excluded from the 50 percent calculation. C. Section 1612.4.1, Lowest Floor Elevation, is added and reads: For buildings in all structure categories located in the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coastal A Flood Zones, the elevation of the lowest floor shall be a minimum of two feet above the base flood elevation, as determined from the applicable FEMA flood hazard map. 19.07.040 International Residential Code section amendments (From 19.05.020) The following sections of the IRC are hereby amended as follows: Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 79 A. Table R301.2(1), Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria, is amended with the following criteria: Flood Hazard(g) = NFIP adoption June 19, 2020. FIRM maps June 19, 2019 B. R322.1, General, is hereby amended as follows: Buildings and structures constructed in whole or in part in flood hazard areas (including A or V Zones) as established in Table R301.2(1) shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions contained in this section. Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within designated floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure which do not increase the ground floor area; and (ii) repairs, reconstruction or improvements to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic places, may be excluded from the 50 percent calculation. 19.07.050 Habitat Assessment (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) A development permit application shall include a habitat assessment unless the project is, in its entirety, one of the following activities: A. Normal maintenance, repairs, or remodeling of structures, such as re -roofing and replacing siding, provided such work is not a substantial improvement or a repair of substantial damage. To comply, such work must be less than 50% of the value of the structure(s). B. Expansion or reconstruction of an existing structure that is no greater than 10% beyond its existing footprint. If the structure is in the floodway, there shall be no change in the structure's dimensions perpendicular to flow. All other federal and state requirements and restrictions relating to floodway development still apply. C. Activities with the sole purpose of creating, restoring, or enhancing natural functions associated with floodplains, streams, lakes, estuaries, marine areas, habitat, and riparian areas that meet federal and state standards, provided the activities do not include structures, grading, fill, or impervious surfaces. D. Development of open space and recreational facilities, such as parks, trails, and hunting grounds, that do not include structures, fill, impervious surfaces, or removal of more than 5% of the native vegetation on that portion of the property in the floodplain. E. Repair to onsite septic systems, provided ground disturbance is the minimal necessary and best management practices (BMPs) to prevent stormwater runoff and soil erosion are used. F. Projects that have already received concurrence under another permit or other consultation with the Services, either through Section 7, Section 4d, or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that addresses the entirety of the project in the floodplain (such as an Army Corps 404 permit or non -conversion Forest Practice activities including any interrelated and interdependent activities.). G. Repair of an existing, functional bulkhead in the same location and footprint with the same materials when the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is still outside of the face of the bulkhead (i.e. if the work qualifies for a Corps exemption from Section 404 coverage). Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 80 19.07.060 Review of Building Permits (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) Where elevation data is not available either through the FIS, FIRM, or from another authoritative source (Section 4.3-2), applications for floodplain development shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding, etc., where available. 19.07.070 Anchoring (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) A. All new construction and substantial improvements, including those related to manufactured homes, shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads including the effects of buoyancy. All manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement, and shall be installed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Anchoring methods may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. For more detailed information, refer to guidebook, FEMA-85, "Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas." 19.07.080 Subdivision Proposals and Development (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) All subdivisions, as well as new development shall: A. Be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; B. Have public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage; C. Have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood damage. D. Where subdivision proposals and other proposed developments contain greater than 50 lots or 5 acres (whichever is the lesser) base flood elevation data shall be included as part of the application 19.07.090 Manufactured Homes (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) A. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated one foot or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement. B. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within zones V1-30, V, and VE on the community's FIRM on sites: a. Outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision, b. In a new manufactured home park or subdivision, c. In an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, or d. In an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as the result of a flood; shall meet the standards of ASCE 24-14, Chapter 4 requirements for residential buildings. Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 81 7.1.b 19.07.100 All Other Building Standards apply (From Flood Damage Prevention Model Ordinance) All new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of the adopted IBC, IRC, Appendix (IBC) G, and ASCE 24. Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 82 7.1.c Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 1/1 Chapter 23.70 FREQUENTLY FLOODED AREAS Chapter 23.70 FREQUENTLY FLOODED AREAS 23.70.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Frequently flooded areas. A. Frequently Flooded Areas. Frequently flooded areas shall include: 1. The special flood hazard areas identified by the Federal Insurance Administrator in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Snohomish County, Washington, and Incorporated Areas" dated June 19, 2020, and any revisions thereto, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS), and any revisions thereto, are hereby pted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The FIS and the FIRM are on file at the Development Services Department at 121 5th Avenue North. The best available information for flood hazard area identification as outlined in Section G 103.3 shall be the basis for regulation until a new FIRM is issued that incorporates data utilized under Section G103.3. -7�Efl1T:f!I:EZTl:lS7f!!/T!lI........ i I' _ p1p !. 2. Those areas identified as frequently flooded areas on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. Identified frequently flooded areas are consistent with and based upon designation of areas of special flood hazard on FEMA flood insurance maps as indicated above. B. City Discretion and Designation. Flood insurance maps and the city's critical areas inventory are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds development services department, project applicants and/or property owners, and the public and should be considered a minimum designation of frequently flooded areas. As flood insurance maps may be continuously updated as areas are reexamined or new areas are identified, newer and more restrictive information for flood hazard area identification shall be the basis for regulation. The city of Edmonds shall retain the right to designate and identify areas known to be prone to flooding outside of the 100-year floodplain and subject them to the provisions and protections of this title and the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4175, passed February 25, 2020. Packet Pg. 83 01 E 9 K 9 M 122026' 15' ° 0'' A75230 A70A8'AF" 122026' 15" Im JOINS PANEL 1000 122022'30" A7052'30" m 0 co w z d z O A70A8'A5" 122022'30" 7.1.d LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATEL BY 100—YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. i ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood by Federal flood protection system under construction ; no base flood elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS rr-.l Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 Protected Area Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. F000dplain Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary\.T Boundary Dividing Special Flood s ^'^'• = Hazard Zones, and Boundary w Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line; " ^^J13^•^'"`^"^^" Elevation in Feet. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. ----- -� Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. RM7 X Elevation Reference Mark 0 M2 River Mile .-. Horizontal Coordinates Based on North 0 97007'30", 32022'30" American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) j Projection. R M NOTES This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program; 0 it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric features outside O Special Flood Hazard Areas. The community map repository should be r- consulted for more detailed data on BFE's, and for any information on floodway delineations, prior to use of this map for property purchase or > O construction purposes. L a Areas of Special Flood Hazard (100-year flood) include Zones A, AE, All- A30, AH, AO, A99, V, VE and V1-V30. Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. M Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and O interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on O hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federal LL Emergency Management Agency. �. Floodway widths in some areas may be too narrow to show to scale. Refer Q to Floodway Data Table where floodway width is shown at 120 inch. E Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and include the effects of wave action; these elevations may also differ significantly ,E- from those developed by the National Weather Service for hurricane to evacuation planning. a Corporate limits shown are current as of the date of this map. The user O should contact appropriate community officials to determine if corporate ,r limits have changed subsequent to the issuance of this map.CL N This map may incorporate approximate boundaries of Coastal Barrier M Resource System Units and /or Otherwise Protected Areas established under the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (PL 101-591). y For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, see Section 6.0 of the Flood Insurance Study Report. V For adjoining map panels and base map source see separately printed Map Index. i MAP REPOSITORY to Refer to Repository Listing on Map Index S j EFFECTIVE DATE OF 0 COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP: C NOVEMBER 8,1999 LL EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISIONS) TO THIS PANEL: 0 �I Refer to the FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE DATE shown .0 on this map to determine when actuarial rates apply to structures in t zones where elevations or depths have been established. 'R j W To determine if flood insurance is available, contact an insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (800) 638--6620. *' CI Ni t V r a. APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 1000 0 1000 FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE t 0111110 -illsw PANEL 1285 Of 1575 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTE CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUR EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1285 E SNOHOMISH COUNTY. UNINCORPORATED AREAS 535634 1285 E MAP NUMB[ 53061C1285 EFFECTIVE OAT NOVEMBER 8,19, JOINS PANEL 1300 JOINS PANEL 1292 Federal Emergency Packet Pg. 84 0 1 0 A 0 M 7.1.d E Is 19 I ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS REFERENCE ELEVATION MARK (FEET NGVD) DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION RM195 21.256 A U.S. Geological Survey standard tablet stamped 28 H 1941 19, located from Edmonds 2.9 miles southwest along Burlington Northern Railroad, 0.1 mite north of Richmond Beach on track side of north concrete supporting first bent west of Burlington Northern Survey Station 873+5.4, on overhead bridge number 14.5. Reset in 1958. 122024'22" 47°48'45" 0 0 _M J z (n z 0 47046'52" 122024'22" JOINS PANEL 1285 122°22'30" 47°48'45" �n _M w 4. a U) z O 47046'52" 122022' 30" LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATE BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONE All Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually arei of ponding); base flood elevatior determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually she( flow on sloping terrain); average deptt determined. For areas of alluvial fan floodin velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood b Federal flood protection system und( construction ; no base flood elevatior determined. ZONE V Coastal flood withvelocity hazard (wav action); no base flood elevations determiner ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wav - action); base flood elevations determine( FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-yes flood with average depths of less tha 1 foot or with drainage areas less tha 1 square mile; and areas protected b levees from 100-year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-yea floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards ar undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS C Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 Protected Are Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. Floodplain Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary Boundary Dividing Special Flood c r Hazard Zones, and Boundary Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line; 513- Elevation in Feet. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. CD>----- -- �D Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone. See Map Index for Elevation Datum RM7 X Elevation Reference Mark tv12 River Mile j Horizontal Coordinates Based on Nort v 97007'30". 32022'30" American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27 r Projection. _ NOTES This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program 0 _ it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly fron- 0 local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric features outside Special Flood Hazard Areas. The community map repository should be C consulted for more detailed data on BFE's, and for any information on floodway delineations, prior to use of this map for property purchase or y construction purposes. L a Areas of Special Flood Hazard (100-year flood) include Zones A, Al A1-- A30, AH, A0, A99, V, VE and VI-V30. M Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by R flood control structures. C3 Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and '0 interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on 0 hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. .. l Floodway widths in some areas may be too narrow to show to scale. Refe U) 06 to Floodway Data Table where floodway width is shown at 120 inch, M E Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and includ( the effects of wave action; these elevations may also differ significanti) from those developed by the National Weather Service for hurricanE R evacuation planning. Q Corporate limits shown are current as of the date of this map. The user 0 should contact appropriate community officials to determine if corporate = limits have changed subsequent to the issuance of this map. to 06 This map may incorporate approximate boundaries of Coastal Barrie M Resource System Units and /or Otherwise Protected Areas establisher 2 under the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (PL 101-591). 4) For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, see W Section 6.0 of the Flood Insurance Study Report. m For adjoining map panels and base map source see separately prime( Map Index. MAP REPOSITORY Refer to Repository Listing on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP: NOVEMBER 8, 1999 EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL: Refer to the FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE DATE shown on this map to determine when actuarial rates apply to structures in zones where elevations or depths have been established. To determine if flood insurance is available. contact an insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (800) 638-6620. nw* APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGR FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MA PANEL 1292 OF 1575 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTI CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUI EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1292 WOODWAY, TOWN OF 530308 1292 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS 535534 1292 MAP NUMB 53061CI191 EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 8, 19 JOINS PANEL 1294 Federal Emergency " Packet Pg. 85 0 11 N ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS REFERENCE ELEVATION MARK (FEET NGVD) DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION RM175 385.560 Standard U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey brass disk stamped C-458 1973, located on north side of 1 9 6 t h Street approximately 135 feet east of fire hydrant # 3 9 5 9 at the n a r t h e a s t corner of 196th Street Southwest and Highway 99, 1.4 feet north of back of sidewalk and 3 feet west of back of curb on the west side of entrance to Jiffy Lube. Monument is buried under landscaping bark slightly lower in elevation than the top back of sidewalk. 122022'30" 47052'30" Co w Z 0- in Z O 47048'45" JOINS PANEL 1015 Pv ST SW' SEA LAWN CYPRUS PLACE PLACE VOHOMISI ;ITY OF E LUNDS GULCH ROAD tiZ m' 3 cn BERTOLA ROAD Z) Z 3 LU BRAEMAR DRIVE FREDERICH F BURLINGTON CITY OF EDMONDS NORTHERN 530163 I— ZONE X SNOHOMISH COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS, 535534 V�Fw w z p Lu u, w ¢ n w z z LU 148TH STREET `L SOUTHWEST Q _ "o V� w Z z > w ¢ 186TH 3 _ STREET SW cc 187TH ii F i STREET SOUTHWEST = w = w I w 00 188TH STREET SOUTHWEST w � F U, w � w Lu 18 w Q 190TH ST SW O F!<� 00 O w �Q 192ND STREET � Lu ¢ w z a { m I Z - JG�� O524 5z4 Q 196TH STREET SOUTHWEST O 9/LF ZONE A MAPLEWOOD 82ND w ZONE X mo LANE PLACE uJ W ... _ uu w tr O Z ~ I- FO _ o > —Z L Z a_ w--- 7TH > Lz u 2 Lfl AVE w ¢ " Q Q N z LiJ� Q r ALOHA w ¢ 24 2 w ¢ �Q� SPRAGUE ST a w a CAROL c6-LH_ WAY 8TH = o = F — AVE AVE OD N BELL N STREET o N MAIN STREET 0 uJ Lu w h 19 �S w ii Q N ° ¢ w DAYTON Cy STREET w LU w 0. _ w rPP� M cc N MAPLE STREET 122022,30" JOINS PANEL 1315 ST N WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY BURLINGTON UNINCORPORATED AREAS NORTHERN 1 5355341 f `FISHER ROPD ZONE X T28N T27N G 122018'45" —T-1 4 7052' 30" SOUTHWEST 164TH STREET LU 4 5 w w � z > wf¢ Q I SNOHOMISH COUNTY MFq o CITY OF LYNNWOOD co �O w LU o Z w T" i a z w I¢ 0 z 0 168TH STREET ~ 0,9 CITY OF LYNNWOOD CITY OF EDMONDS 170TH PL O� � 68TH ty AVENUE WEST r� EX 176TH STREET SOUNDVIEW w WAY CITY J OFI a l EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY SNOHOMISH r UNINCORPORATED AREAS COUNTY 535534 ZONE X ""ST ST 181ST PL Q 182ND STREET 182ND ST 40 �OO 183RD 183R ST ST 183RD PL � v (1 185TH ST �+ 1C1 w z w 185TH PL LF = Q 186TH ST 788TH PqACE!PEN2NYLANE C 189TH P 189TH = r w > 190TH `L 0TH STREET I— N 191ST 91ST ST A E 192ND 192NO PLACE PLACE a PLACE F 193RD STREET � Z > w Q 196TH STREET 19�Ty �-, CITY OF LYNNWOOD 530167 200TH ZONE X H LU V i 202ND w W = 99 204TH 20 STREET y<F WAY K -� WAY STREET w Z Z Q STREET STREET �U = a 47048'45" 122018'45" 7.1.d LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood by Federal flood protection . system under construction ; no base flood elevations determined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood. r---`�--} OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 Protected Areas Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. Floodplain Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary " Boundary Dividing Special Flood Hazard Zones, and Boundary Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line; -513 Elevation in Feet. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. ------ --� Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. RM7 X Elevation Reference Mark • M2 River Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based on North v 97007'30". 32022'30" American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) C Projection. _ NOTES E This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program; O it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from a local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric features outside O Special Flood Hazard Areas. The community map repository should be C consulted for more detailed data on BFE's, and for any information on 4) floodway delineations, prior to use of this map for property purchase or > construction purposes. t2 Areas of Special Flood Hazard 1100-year flood) include Zones A, AE, Al - tv A30, AH, AO, A99, V, VE and V1-V30. to Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by E flood control structures. M Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections and -0 interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on O O hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Floodway widths in some areas may be too narrow to show to scale. Refer R' to Floodway Data Table where floodway width is shown at 120 inch. CI E Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and include the effects of wave action; these elevations may also differ significantly S from those developed by the National Weather Service for hurricane M evacuation planning. Q Corporate limits shown are current as of the date of this map. The user O should contact appropriate community officials to determine if corporate ,—O2 limits have changed subsequent to the issuance of this map. This map may incorporate approximate boundaries of Coastal Barrier CL Resource System Units and /or Otherwise Protected Areas established under the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (PL 101-591). tv For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, see Section 6.0 of the Flood Insurance Study Report. d U For adjoining map panels and base map source see separately printed = Map Index. M MAP REPOSITORY 3 to Refer to Repository Listing on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF O COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP: O NOVEMBER 8,1999 LL EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISION(S) TO THIS PANEL: O Refer to the FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE DATE shown 2 on this map to determine when actuarial rates apply to structures in t E zones where elevations or depths have been established. To determine if flood insurance is available, contact an insurance agent or LU call the National Flood Insurance Program at (800) 638 6620. +' C d t c) Q APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 1000 0 1000 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRA FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREA PANEL 1305 OF 1575 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTE[ CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFF EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1305 E LYNNWOOD. CITY OF 530167 1305 E SNOHOMISH COUNTY. UNINCORPORATED AREAS 535534 1305 E MAP NUMBE 53061C1305 EFFECTIVE DATI NOVEMBER 8,199 Federal Emergency M Packet Pg. 86 A B D E F 7.1.d M■ rA M F17 A■ ,A ■ 122022'30" 47048'45" r--- N N_ J w Z a V) Z 0 N W W - c0 v BELL STREET '4 x D CL M 24 = MAIN STREET m MAIN `Shell DAYTON STREET _ < m � co MAPLE = i STREET �y he ALDER = STREET D m c D WALNUT m m STREET G N CEDAR r^—STREET SOW O1N SPRUCE ST _ SOUTH � o c HEMLOCK ST = m LAUREL ST Z C M en PINE STREET PINE FIR ST r-- JOINS PANEL 1305 STREET 19 o r 208TH x zw C 3 m x w w ZONE X 212TH STREET SOUTHWEST a cc 82ND e CITY OF EDMONDS y 0) 530163 x C In :E STREET m 216TH STREET SW m C 1 218TH I STREET ---� ZONE X 25 ' --`-- ZONE X 30 224TH STREET SW TOWN OF WOODWAY 530308 I c I 228TH STREET - 7x- 28TH STREET x e z C m D ® 230TH STREET SW m Z m Tm �o 234TH STREET WEST Lu x C� < 31 m 36 236TH STREET WEST = SNOHOMISH COUNTY x < UNINCORPORATED AREAS Z ZONE X D m 535534 238TH STREET SW m CITY OF EDMONDS 530163 w 240TH S SW `c n < O i`2 o? 9 242ND i STREET = SW { Co ' m T27N SNOHOMISH COUNTY KING COUNTY 47045'00" ' 122°22'30" 122°i8'45" —p 47048'45" STREET WEST 20 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 530167 rn x D 0)m U) _®NE X 211TH m � D m m m ZONE A 213TH O� PL 215TH ST Z N ZONE A 216TH ST Sw Hall Creek P 0 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 530170 220TH STREET SOUTHWEST ® 222ND STREET SOUTHWEST C 6 29 m \ k rn 224TH ST SW i SNOHOMISH COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS z 535534 26TH PL SW 227TH ST ZONE X \` 228TH STREET SW ZONE A ?S rH 230TH a a 2 r m ST S� NQ p29ry C 230TH ST SW L 23p m r � N ST SW 232ND ST SW �•� `�F, �� � �i 23 h SNOHOMISH COU KING COUNTY 32 0 w Z a V) Z O / \ T27N --' 47045'00" 122°18'45" a^ SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATE w, BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually are of pending); base flood elevatioi determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually she flow on sloping terrain); average dept! determined. For areas of alluvial fan floodin velocities also determined. ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood I Federal flood protection system and construction ; no base flood elevatioi determined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wa, action); no base flood elevations determine ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wa, action); base flood elevations determine . = = FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-ye. flood with average depths of less the 1 foot or with drainage areas less the 1 square mile; and areas protected t levees from 100-year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-ye floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards a undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS j -- Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 Protected Are Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Specia Flood Hazard Areas. Floodplain Boundary Floodway Boundary Zone D Boundary 5; • ; ;, ;. t,., Boundary Dividing Special Flood Hazard Zones, and Boundary „'MONg Dividin Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line 513 Elevation in Feet. See Map Inde> for Elevation Datum. — — --- Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone See Map Index for Elevation Datum RM7 X Elevation Reference Mark ® M2 River Mile 4) Horizontal Coordinates Based on Nor C1 97007'30". 32022'30" American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27 Projection. R M NOTESL This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program O it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly fron a O local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric features outsidE Special Flood Hazard Areas. The community map repository should bE C consulted for more detailed data on BFE's, and for any information or floodway delineations, prior to use of this map for property purchase of d construction purposes. L 0- Areas of Special Flood Hazard (100-year flood) include Zones A, AE, Al- N A30, AH, AO, A99, V, VE and Vt-V30. cad E Certain areas not in Special Flood Hazard Areas may be protected by flood control structures. Q Boundaries of the floodways were computed at cross sections anE interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based or G O hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the Federa — Emergency Management Agency. .. Floodway widths in some areas may be too narrow to show to scale. Refe Q. to Floodway Data Table where floodway width is shown at 120 inch. M E Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and includ the effects of wave action; these elevations may also differ significant) from those developed by the National Weather Service for hurrican 5 evacuation planning. Q- Corporate limits shown are current as of the date of this map. The use, 0 should contact appropriate community officials to determine if corporatE limits have changed subsequent to the issuance of this map N Q This map may incorporate approximate boundaries of Coastal BarriE M Resource System Unts and /or Otherwise Protected Areas establishe 2 under the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (PL 101-591). 4) r For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, sef Section 6.0 of the Flood Insurance Study Report. y U For adjoining map panels and base map source see separately printer Map Index, MAP REPOSITORY U) Refer to Repository Listing on Map Index EFFECTIVE DATE OF 0 COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP: 0 LL NOVEMBER 8,1999 .a EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF REVISIONS) TO THIS PANEL: Refer to the FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE DATE showr r on this map to determine when actuarial rates apply to structures it t zones where elevations or depths have been established. X W To determine if flood insurance is available, contact an insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (800) 638-6620. V Q APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 1000 0 1000 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGR an FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MA SNOHOMISH COI.TNTI WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED ARE. PANEL 1315 OF 1575 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINT COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SU EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 13T5 LYNNWOOD, CITY OF 530167 1315 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, CITY OF 530170 1315 INOOD'WAY, TOWN OF 530308 1315 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS 535534 1315 Federal Emergency Packet Pg. 87 1250000 FT 1220 26' 15" 1255000 FT 1260000 FT I 7.1.e I 47° 320000 F 315000 FT 310000 FT 305000 FT 47' 48' 45" 122' FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT HTTPS://MSC. FEMA.G0V SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A..V. A99 With BFE or Depth lane AE, AG, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway h I� 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of I% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard WZZ Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See Notes..:, INOSCREENI Areas Determined to he Outside the OTHER 0.2% Annual Chance Fioodplain zone x AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D ------------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Accredited or Provisionally Accredited GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall STRUCTURES Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall E 18.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17 "5 Water Surface Elevation (BFE) - - - - Coastal Transect -- - Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline �43c�,:omE 5 aoom 1220 22' 30" 44 E 54500omE 54800om NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program [NFIP) in general, please Call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https:llmsc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report. and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Base map information shown on this panel was provided by the USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field Office. This information was derived from digital orthophotography at a scale of 1:12,000 and 1-meter pixel resolution from photography dated 2009. SCALE ll Map Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet: Westerly Hemisphere; Vertical Datum: NAVD 88 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,000 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Meters 0 255 510 1,020 PANEL LOCATOR 1015 1910101 1 W K E 0 M0 0 0 U. C .IN a� '2' 30" 470 52' 30" 5302000% 63010o0mN 530000 '- N s2gg000r,N 5298000MN z07000mN AH RD a6000mN 45" NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS q a�rA�1F� PANEL 1285 OF 1517 5 im % ��� ���Hn sEc�ar FEMA Pane] Contains: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1285 F SNOHOMISH COUNTY 535534 1285 F VERSION NUMBER 2.3.2.1 Hydrographic Feature srs— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) OTHER Limit of Study FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary 1292 1315 * PANEL NOT PRINTED MAP NUMBER 5306IC1285F MAP REVISED JUNE 19, 2020 Packet Pg. 88 1255000 FT 122' 24' 22" 1260000 FT I 7.1.e I 470 4 300000 295000 FT 290000 FT 470 46' 52" 122 FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT HTTPS://MSC. FEMA.G0V Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A..V. A99 With BFE or Depth zone AF, AG, AH, VE, AR SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD h I� 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of I% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See Notes.. : INOSCREENI Areas Determined to he Outside the OTHER 0.2% Annual Chance Fioodplain zone x AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D ----------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Accredited or Provisionally Accredited GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall STRUCTURES mmmmmmtt m Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall E 18.2 Crass Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17 5 Water Surface Elevation (BFE) - - - - Coastal Transect -- - Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline .545cocmF 546000mE 1229 22' 30" NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Efate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, andlor digital versions of this map. Many of these products can he ordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Base map information shown on this panel was provided by the USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field Office. This information was derived from digital orthaphotography at a scale of 1:12,000 and 1-meter pixel resolution from photography dated 2009. SCALE i N Map ProjecDon: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet; Western Hemisphere; Vertical Datum: NAVD 88 I inch = 500 feet 1:6,000 0 500 0 125 PANEL LOCATOR 1,000 2,000 Feet Meters 250 500 1305 1315 0 W � rx M0 0 0 U. CU IN a� P►AMIN 47° 48' 45" 5295000mN 5294000mN 293000mN 52" NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS ry q a�rA�1F� PANEL 1292 OF 1575� ���Hn sEc�ar FEMA Pane] Contains: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1292 F SNOHOMISH COUNTY 535534 1292 F WOODWAY. TOWN OF 530308 1292 F VERSION NUMBER 2.3.2.1 Hydrographic Feature 513- Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) OTHER Limit of Study FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary 1294 * PANEL NOT PRINTED MAP NUMBER 53061C1292F MAP REVISED JUNE 19, 2020 Packet Pg. 89 1265000 FT 1220 22' 30" 1270000 FT 1275000 FT I 7.1.e I 47' fcY��I�I�I�I� 315000 FT 4511IH11111llfl 305000 FT 470 48' 45" 122° 5 000m 47 548000mE 549ncomE 550000mE 551 000mE 1220 98' 45" FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT HTTPS://MSC. FEMA.G0V Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A..V. A99 With BFE or Depth zone AE, AG, AH, VE, AR SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD h I� 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of I% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone x Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See Notes.. : INOSCREENI Areas Determined to he Outside the OTHER 0.2% Annual Chance Fioodplain zone x AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D ----------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Accredited or Provisionally Accredited GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall STRUCTURES mmmmmmtt m Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall E 18.2 Crass Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17 "5 Water Surface Elevation (BFE) - - - - Coastal Transect -- - Coastal Transect Baseline - Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature 513- Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) OTHER Limit of Study FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Efate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, andlor digital versions of this map. Many of these products can he ordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Base map information shown on this panel was provided by the USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field Office. This information was derived from digital orthaphotography at a scale of 1:12,000 and 1-meter pixel resolution from photography dated 2009. SCALE ll Map ProjecDon: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet; Western Hemisphere; Vertical Datum: NAVD 88 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,000 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Meters 0 255 510 1,020 PANEL LOCATOR MR111 IiK31to] 1309 1320 1317 E 0 W � r`x 1� �p 0 0 U. cu Its a� 45" 7° 52' 30" 5302000mN 53o 1000mN 5300000'N !9900omN j8000mN 70n0mN ;a0H'N 6"A NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 1305 OF 15 f 5 N ���Hn sEc�ar FEMA Pane] Contains: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1305 F LYNNWOOD, CITY OF 530167 1305 F SNOHOMISH COUNTY 535534 1305 F VERSION NUMBER 2.3.2.1 MAP NUMBER 53001C1305F MAP REVISED JUNE 19, 2020 Packet Pg. 90 * PANEL NOT PRINTED I 7.1.e I 1220 22' 30" 1265000 FT SKYDLIINE 1270000 FT 1275nnf) FT 30 295( Town of Woodwa 530308 2900C 285000 280000 F 470 4f 12 5 OQQm 47 5 OOOm 48 E 54900vmE 5500 0 QmE 5510oomE 122' 18' 45" FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT HTTPS://MSC. FEMA.G0V Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A..V. A99 With BFE or Depth zone AF, AG, AH, VE, AR SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD h I� 0.2%Q Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1%Q annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone x Future Conditions 1%Q Annual Chance Flood Hazard Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See Notes.. : INOSCREENI Areas Determined to he Outside the OTHER 0.2%Q Annual Chance Fioodplain zone x AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D ----------- Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Accredited or Provisionally Accredited GENERAL Levee, Dike, or Floodwall STRUCTURES mmmmmmtt m Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall E 18.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17 "5 Water Surface Elevation (BFE) - - - - Coastal Transect -- - Coastal Transect Baseline - Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature 513- Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Efate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, andlor digital versions of this map. Many of these products can he ordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Base map information shown on this panel was provided by the USDA-FSA Aerial Photography Field Office. This information was derived from digital orthaphotography at a scale of 1:12,000 and 1-meter pixel resolution from photography dated 2009. SCALE ll Map ProjecDon: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet; Western Hemisphere; Vertical Datum: NAVD 88 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,000 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Meters 0 255 510 1,020 PANEL LOCATOR 1310 1309 1320 1317 iIE iRl 45" '° 48' 45" 60TH AVE W 5295Q0omN 12TH LSW 5294000mN H w ,293000mN 92000mN 3ATEWAY BLV❑ �1000mN )000mN �00mN rom E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON 0 AND INCORPORATED AREAS �W �1 ■L q a�rAF� 1PANEL 1315 OF 1575 N 44 ram+ ���Hn 56�%)ar FEMA CQ rho = Panel Contains: `ti 'li'•3 5�4..h• . COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EDMONDS, CITY OF 530163 1315 F LYNNWOOD, CITY OF 530167 1315 F MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, 530170 1315 F 0 CITY OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY 535534 1315 F WOODWAY, TOWN OF 530308 1315 F ILL. CCU IN a� VERSION NUMBER 2.3.2.1 OTHER Limit of Study FEATURES Jurisdiction Boundary * PANEL NOT PRINTED MAP NUMBER 53061C1315F MAP REVISED JUNE 19, 2020 Packet Pg. 91 7.1.f ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADOPT FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT MEASURES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO CONTINUE THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY NECESSITATING IMMEDIATE ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds received a March 16, 2020 letter from the Director of FEMA's Floodplain Management Division; and WHEREAS, the letter described certain steps that were required by the City to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); and WHEREAS, a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) have been completed for the City of Edmonds; and WHEREAS, the FIS and FIRM will become effective on June 19, 2020; and WHEREAS, by the June 19, 2020 effective date, the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Regional Office is required to approve the legally enforceable floodplain management measures that the City of Edmonds adopts in accordance with Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 60.3(e); and WHEREAS, the adoption of compliant floodplain management measures will provide protection for the City of Edmonds and will ensure its participation in the NFIP; and WHEREAS, the NFIP State Coordinating Office for Washington State has verified that Washington cities may include language in their floodplain management measures that automatically adopt the most recently available flood elevation data provided by FEMA; and WHEREAS, the above referenced March 16, 2020 letter was FEMA's official notification to the City of Edmonds that it has until June 19, 2020 to adopt floodplain management regulations that meet or exceed the minimum NFIP requirements and request approval of those regulations from the FEMA Regional Office; Packet Pg. 92 7.1.f WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds' adopted floodplain management measures will be reviewed upon receipt and the FEMA Regional Office will notify the City when the measures are approved; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds' compliance with these mandatory program requirements will enable the City to avoid suspension from the NFIP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390, this interim ordinance may be adopted on an emergency basis without first holding a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the COVID-19 crisis has prevented the City from using its normal public participation process leading up to the adoption of these regulations; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new chapter 19.07 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Flood Damage Prevention," is hereby added to read as set forth in Attachment A hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Section 23.70.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Designation, rating and mapping — Frequently flooded areas," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment B hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike thr-ough). Section 3. Section 19.05.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Section amendments," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment C hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike thfo g ). Packet Pg. 93 7.1.f Section 4. Section 19.00.025 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "International Building Code section amendments," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Attachment D hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in s4il£e thfough). Section 5. Sunset. This interim ordinance shall remain in effect for 180 days from the effective date or until it is replaced with another ordinance adopting permanent regulations, after which point it shall have no further effect. Section 6. Emergency Declaration. The city council hereby declares that an emergency exists necessitating that this ordinance take effect immediately upon passage by a majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the council, and that the same is not subject to a referendum (RCW 35A.12.130). Without an immediate adoption of this interim zoning ordinance, the City of Edmonds could be suspended from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Therefore, this interim regulation must be imposed as an emergency measure to protect the public health, safety and welfare by ensuring that the City continues to participate in the NFIP. Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect immediately upon passage, as set forth in Section 6, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is not adopted by a majority plus one of the entire membership of the council, then the language declaring an emergency shall be disregarded, in which case, this ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take Packet Pg. 94 7.1.f effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. Section 9. Adoption of Findings. The city council hereby adopts the above "whereas" clauses as findings of fact in support of the adoption of this interim ordinance. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: :• JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 95 7.1.f SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADOPT FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT MEASURES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO CONTINUE THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY NECESSITATING IMMEDIATE ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 12020. 4840-7251-8158, v. 1 5 CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 96 Attachment A 7.1.f Chapter 19.07 FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION 19.07.000 Purpose 19.07.010 Applicability 19.07.020 Definitions 19.07.030 International Building Code section amendments 19.07.040 International Residential Code section amendments 19.07.050 Habitat Assessment 19.07.060 Review of Building Permits 19.07.070 Anchoring 19.07.080 Subdivision Proposals and Development 19.07.090 Manufactured Homes 19.07.100 All Other Building Standards apply 19.07.010 Purpose It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; reduce the annual cost of flood insurance; and minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: A. Protect human life and health; B. Minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; C. Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; D. Minimize prolonged business interruptions; E. Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities, such as water and gas mains; electric, telephone, and sewer lines; and streets and bridges located in flood hazard areas; F. Help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of flood hazard areas so as to minimize blight areas caused by flooding; G. Notify potential buyers that the property is in a Special Flood Hazard Area; H. Notify those who occupy flood hazard areas that they assume responsibility for their actions; and I. Participate in and maintain eligibility for flood insurance and disaster relief. 19.07.010 Applicability A. Lands to which the chapter applies. This chapter shall apply to all special flood hazard areas within the boundaries of the City of Edmonds. B. Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard. The special flood hazard areas identified by the Federal Insurance Administrator in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Snohomish County, Washington, and Incorporated Areas" dated June 19, 2020, and any revisions thereto, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and any Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 97 Attachment A 7.1.f revisions thereto, are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The FIS and the FIRM are on file at the Development Services Department at 121 5ch Avenue North. The best available information for flood hazard area identification as outlined in Section G103.3 shall be the basis for regulation until a new FIRM is issued that incorporates data utilized under Section G 103.3. 19.07.020 Definitions The following definitions apply to this chapter... A. Alteration of Watercourse: Any action that will change the location of the channel occupied by water within the banks of any portion of a riverine waterbody. B. Area of special flood hazard: The land in the floodplain within a community subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. It is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as zone A, AO, AH, Al-30, AE, A99, AR (V, VO, V1-30, VE). "Special flood hazard area" is synonymous in meaning with the phrase "area of special flood hazard". C. Base flood: The flood having a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (also referred to as the "100-year flood"). D. Base Flood Elevation (BFE): the elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise during the base flood. E. Coastal High Hazard Area: An area of special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary frontal dune along an open coast and any other area subject to high velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources. The area is designated on the FIRM as zone V1-30, VE or V. F. Development: Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials located within the area of special flood hazard. G. Elevation Certificate: An administrative tool of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that can be used to provide elevation information, to determine the proper insurance premium rate, and to support a request for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision based on fill (LOM R-F). H. Flood or Flooding: A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from: a. The overflow of inland or tidal waters. b. The unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source. c. Mudslides (i.e., mudflows) which are proximately caused by flooding as defined in paragraph (1)(b) of this definition and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of water and deposited along the path of the current. The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 98 Attachment A 7.1.f accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in paragraph (1)(a) of this definition. I. Flood elevation study: An examination, evaluation and determination of flood hazards and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination, evaluation and determination of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or flood -related erosion hazards. Also known as a Flood Insurance Study (FIS). J. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): The official map of a community, on which the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM). K. Floodplain or flood -prone area: Any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source. See "Flood or flooding." L. Floodplain administrator: The community official designated by title to administer and enforce the floodplain management regulations. M. Floodplain management regulations: Zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as floodplain ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance) and other application of police power. The term describes such state or local regulations, in any combination thereof, which provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and reduction. N. Flood proofing: Any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate risk of flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures, and their contents. Flood proofed structures are those that have the structural integrity and design to be impervious to floodwater below the Base Flood Elevation. O. Habitat Assessment: A written document that describes a project, identifies and analyzes the project's impacts to habitat for species discussed in the "Endangered Species Act — Section 7 Consultation Final Biological Opinion and Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for the Implementation of the National Flood Insurance Program in the State of Washington, Phase One Document — Puget Sound Region," and provides an Effects Determination. Highest adjacent grade: The highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. Q. Historic structure: Any structure that is: 1. Listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register; 2. Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district; 3. Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of Interior; or Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment A 7.1.f 4. Individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either: a. By an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, or b. Directly by the Secretary of the Interior in states without approved programs. Mean Sea Level: For purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the vertical datum to which Base Flood Elevations shown on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. New construction: For the purposes of determining insurance rates, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of an initial Flood Insurance Rate Map or after December 31, 1974, whichever is later, and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. For floodplain management purposes, "new construction" means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. T. Structure: For floodplain management purposes, a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. 19.07.030 International Building Code section amendments The following sections of the IBC are hereby amended as follows: A. Section 110.3.3, Lowest floor elevation, is amended to read: In flood hazard areas, upon placement of the lowest floor, including the basement, and prior to further vertical construction, the elevation certification required in Section 1612.5 shall be submitted to the building official. Prior to final inspection approval, the building official shall require an elevation certificate based on finished construction prepared and sealed by a State li-censed land surveyor. B. Section 1612.1.1, Residential Structures, is added and reads: Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within designated floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure which do not increase the ground floor area; and (ii) repairs, reconstruction or improvements to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic places, may be excluded from the 50 percent calculation. C. Section 1612.4.1, Lowest Floor Elevation, is added and reads: For buildings in all structure categories located in the Coastal High Hazard Areas and Coastal A Flood Zones, the elevation of the lowest floor shall be a minimum of two feet above the base flood elevation, as determined from the applicable FEMA flood hazard map. 19.07.040 International Residential Code section amendments The following sections of the IRC are hereby amended as follows: Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment A 7.1.f A. Table R301.2(1), Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria, is amended with the following criteria: Flood Hazard(g) = NFIP adoption June 19, 2020. FIRM maps June 19, 2019 B. R322.1, General, is hereby amended as follows: Buildings and structures constructed in whole or in part in flood hazard areas (including A or V Zones) as established in Table R301.2(1) shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions contained in this section. Construction or reconstruction of residential structures is prohibited within designated floodways, except for (i) repairs, reconstruction, or improvements to a structure which do not increase the ground floor area; and (ii) repairs, reconstruction or improvements to a structure, the cost of which does not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure either, (A) before the repair, or reconstruction is started, or (B) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of State or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions, or to structures identified as historic places, may be excluded from the 50 percent calculation. 19.07.050 Habitat Assessment A development permit application shall include a habitat assessment unless the project is, in its entirety, one of the following activities: A. Normal maintenance, repairs, or remodeling of structures, such as re -roofing and replacing siding, provided such work is not a substantial improvement or a repair of substantial damage. To comply, such work must be less than 50% of the value of the structure(s). Expansion or reconstruction of an existing structure that is no greater than 10% beyond its existing footprint. If the structure is in the floodway, there shall be no change in the structure's dimensions perpendicular to flow. All other federal and state requirements and restrictions relating to floodway development still apply. C. Activities with the sole purpose of creating, restoring, or enhancing natural functions associated with floodplains, streams, lakes, estuaries, marine areas, habitat, and riparian areas that meet federal and state standards, provided the activities do not include structures, grading, fill, or impervious surfaces. D. Development of open space and recreational facilities, such as parks, trails, and hunting grounds, that do not include structures, fill, impervious surfaces, or removal of more than 5% of the native vegetation on that portion of the property in the floodplain. E. Repair to onsite septic systems, provided ground disturbance is the minimal necessary and best management practices (BMPs) to prevent stormwater runoff and soil erosion are used. Projects that have already received concurrence under another permit or other consultation with the Services, either through Section 7, Section 4d, or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that addresses the entirety of the project in the floodplain (such as an Army Corps 404 permit or non -conversion Forest Practice activities including any interrelated and interdependent activities.). G. Repair of an existing, functional bulkhead in the same location and footprint with the same materials when the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is still outside of the face of the bulkhead (i.e. if the work qualifies for a Corps exemption from Section 404 coverage). Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment A 7.1.f 19.07.060 Review of Building Permits Where elevation data is not available either through the FIS, FIRM, or from another authoritative source (Section 4.3-2), applications for floodplain development shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding, etc., where available. 19.07.070 Anchoring A. All new construction and substantial improvements, including those related to manufactured homes, shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads including the effects of buoyancy. All manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement, and shall be installed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Anchoring methods may include, but are not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. For more detailed information, refer to guidebook, FEMA-85, "Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas." 19.07.080 Subdivision Proposals and Development All subdivisions, as well as new development shall: A. Be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; B. Have public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water systems located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage; C. Have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood damage. D. Where subdivision proposals and other proposed developments contain greater than 50 lots or 5 acres (whichever is the lesser) base flood elevation data shall be included as part of the application. 19.07.090 Manufactured Homes A. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites shall be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated one foot or more above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement. B. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved within zones V1-30, V, and VE on the community's FIRM on sites: a. Outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision, b. In a new manufactured home park or subdivision, c. In an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, or d. In an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred "substantial damage" as the result of a flood; shall meet the standards of ASCE 24-14, Chapter 4 requirements for residential buildings. Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment A 7.1.f 19.07.100 All Other Building Standards Apply All new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of the adopted IBC, IRC, Appendix (IBC) G, and ASCE 24. Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 103 7.1.f Attachment B Chapter 23.70 FREQUENTLY FLOODED AREAS 23.70.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Frequently flooded areas. A. Frequently Flooded Areas. Frequently flooded areas shall include: 1. The special flood hazard areas identified by the Federal Insurance Administrator in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Snohomish County, Washington, and Incorporated Areas" dated June 19, 2020, and any revisions thereto, with accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS), and any revisions thereto, are hereby pted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. The FIS and the FIRM are on file at the Development Services Department at 121 5th Avenue North. The best available information for flood hazard area identification as outlined in Section G 103.3 shall be the basis for regulation until a new FIRM is issued that incorporates data utilized under Section G103.3. These afeas identified an FEMA 14eed insufanee maps as afeas ef speeiai fleed hazaFd, whieh ifielidde these the in4ernational Residential Code and in4ernational Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title • 2. Those areas identified as frequently flooded areas on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. Identified frequently flooded areas are consistent with and based upon designation of areas of special flood hazard on FEMA flood insurance maps as indicated above. B. City Discretion and Designation. Flood insurance maps and the city's critical areas inventory are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds development services department, project applicants and/or property owners, and the public and should be considered a minimum designation of frequently flooded areas. As flood insurance maps may be continuously updated as areas are reexamined or new areas are identified, newer and more restrictive information for flood hazard area identification shall be the basis for regulation. The city of Edmonds shall retain the right to designate and identify areas known to be prone to flooding outside of the 100-year floodplain and subject them to the provisions and protections of this title and the current editions of the International Residential Code and International Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Packet Pg. 104 Attachment C 7.1.f 19.05.020 Section amendments. The following sections of the IRC are hereby amended as follows: A. Table R301.2(1), Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria, is amended with the following criteria: 1. Ground Snow Load = 25 psf non -reducible 2. Wind Speed(d) = 85 mph 3. Topographical effects(k) = No 4. Seismic Design Category(f) = D1 5. Weathering(a) = moderate 6. Frost Line Depth(b) = 18 inches 7. Termite(c) = slight to moderate 8. Winter Design Temp(e) = 27 degrees F 9. Flood u...,a fd( )--�deption 3/2644. FIRM mapsl 99 10. Ice Shield Underlayment(h) = not required 11. Air Freezing Index(i) = 0-1000 12. Mean Annual Tempo) = 50 degrees F B. R313.1, Automatic fire sprinkler system, is added and reads: 1. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in new buildings containing five (5) or more attached dwelling units. Refer to ECDC 19.25.035. 2. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in new one -family and two- family dwellings and townhouses exceeding 3,000 square feet of fire area. 3. The design and installation of residential fire sprinkler systems shall be in accordance with NFPA 13D. _C. R322. 1 General, is hereby amended as i 0. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3819 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3796 § 2, 2010]. Packet Pg. 105 Attachment D 7.1.f 19.00.025 International Building Code section amendments. The following sections of the IBC are hereby amended as follows: A. Section 104.3, Notices and Orders, is amended to read: The building official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with this code. The building official is also authorized to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code compliance in addition to the remedies provided for in this code. B. Section 105.1.1, Annual Permit, is deleted. C. Section 105.1.1, Demolition Permits, is added and shall read: Before the partial or complete demolition of any building or structure (interior or exterior), a demolition permit shall be obtained from the building official. The permit fee is established pursuant to Chapter 19.70 ECDC. The applicant shall also post with the city, prior to permit issuance, a performance bond, or frozen fund, conforming to Chapter 17.10 ECDC herein, in an amount to be determined by the building official to satisfy all city requirements no later than 180 days after the issuance of the permit. The demolition performance bond or frozen fund shall not be released until the building official determines the following requirements have been completed: 1. Cap Abandoned Sanitary Sewers. Septic tanks shall be pumped, collapsed and removed and/or filled with earth, sand, concrete, CDF or hard slurry. 2. Knock Down of Concrete Foundation Walls, Porches, Chimneys and Similar Structures. Concrete, bricks, cobbles and boulders shall be broken to less than 12-inch diameter. Debris left on site shall conform to IBC Section 1804.2 for clean fill. 3. Construction debris, vegetation, and garbage attributable to the demolition shall be removed from the site and from unopened street right-of-way within 30 days of written notice. No debris of any kind may be placed or maintained on street right-of-way (including alleys) without a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 18.60 or 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. 4. Repair of any damage to, and restoration of, any public property to substantially original conditions, i.e., alley, street, sidewalk, landscaping, water, sewer, storm and other utilities, rockeries, retaining walls, etc, in accordance with this code and the City's engineering requirements. 5. Grading of Site Back to Original Topography Grades. Basements shall be filled and compacted to 90 percent as verified by a special inspector. "Structural fill" is defined as any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils need to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill shall be clean and free draining, placed above unyielding native site soils and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent modified proctor, per ASTM D1557. 6. Temporary erosion control shall be installed and maintained per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. D. Section 105.1.2, Annual permit records, is deleted. E. Section 105.2, Work exempt from permit, is replaced as follows: Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant's responsibility to comply with bulk zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless required by the Packet Pg. 106 Attachment D 7.1.f provisions of ECDC Title 23 or limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC: 1. Building (general): (a) One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (including the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 120 square feet, with a maximum eave of thirty (30) inches. (b) Fences not over six (6) feet high; provided a permit is not required by Chapter 17.30 ECDC. (c) Movable cases, counters and partitions not over five (5) feet nine (9) inches high. (d) Retaining walls 4 feet (1,219 nun) in height or less measured vertically from the finished grade at the exposed toe of the retaining wall to the highest point in the wall, unless: I. Supporting a surcharge; or II. Impounding Class I, II, III -A liquids; or III. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC. (e) Rockeries. Construction of rockeries is limited as specified elsewhere in this code. (f) Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two (2) to one (1). (g) Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC. (h) Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish work. (i) Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery. 0) Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes. (k) Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to an occupancy in which the pool walls are entirely above the adjacent grade and the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons. Hot tubs and spas less than 5,000 gallons, completely supported by the ground. (1) Grading less than fifty (50) cubic yards (placed, removed or moved within any 365-day period) unless subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC. (m) Repair of appliances which do not alter original approval, certification, listing or code. (n) Replacement or adding new insulation with no drywall removal or placement. (o) Replacement or repair of existing gutters or downspouts. (p) The following types of signs are exempt from permit requirements except that dimensional size and placement standards shall comply with Chapter 20.60 ECDC: I. Replacing the panel on a previously permitted existing wall cabinet or pole sign, II. Repainting an existing previously permitted wood sign, III. Painted or vinyl lettering on storefront windows, Packet Pg. 107 Attachment D 7.1.f IV. Governmental signs, campaign signs, official public notices, and signs required by provision of local, state, or federal law, V. Temporary signs announcing the sale or rent of property and other tem-porary signs as described in ECDC 20.60.080, VI. Signs erected by the transportation authorities, and temporary seasonal and holiday displays. 2. Mechanical: (a) Portable heating, ventilation, cooling, cooking or clothes drying appliances. (b) Replacement of any part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. (c) Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. (d) Steam, hot or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by this code. (e) Portable evaporative cooler. (f) Self-contained refrigeration systems containing ten (10) pounds or less of refrigerant or that are actuated by motor of one (1) horsepower or less. 3. Plumbing: (a) The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe, provided that the replacement of defective material shall be done with new material and a permit obtained and inspection made. (b) Reinstallation or replacement of approved prefabricated plumbing fixtures that do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves or pipes. 4. Residential permit exemptions: In addition the following exemptions apply for single family dwellings: (a) One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (including the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 200 square feet, with a maximum eave of twelve (12) inches and maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. Vehicle storage structures, such as garages and carports, are not exempted. (b) Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not project more than fifty-four (54) inches from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. ECDC Title 23 provisions shall not apply to such awnings. (c) Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet. (d) Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title 23 provisions shall not apply. (e) Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding. ECDC Title 23 provisions shall not apply- (f) Replacement or repair of existing windows or doors provided; no alteration of structural members is required, the replacement would not require installation of safety glazing, the Packet Pg. 108 Attachment D 7.1.f installation does not involve required egress windows. ECDC Title 23 provisions shall not apply- (g) Minor like -for -like drywall repairs not involving fire -rated assemblies. (h) Replacement or repair of individual decking, joists, stair treads, or intermediate rails. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. (i) Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, not exceeding 200 square feet in area, that are not more than thirty (30) inches above grade at any point and do not serve the exit door required by IRC Section R311.4. 0) Canopies, as defined in ECDC 17.70.035, accessory to a single family dwelling, with a floor area measured to the exterior wall or post not to exceed 200 square feet, for covered storage, carport or similar use. (k) Reroof overlays. Overlays are not permitted over slate, clay or cement tiles, or where the existing roof has two or more applications of any type of roofing. F. Section 105.3.2, Time limitation of permit application, is amended to read: 1. Applications, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. 2. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days prior to such expiration date. 3. No application shall be extended more than once for a total application life of 360 days except as allowed within this section. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on any applicable code or ordinance change, and pay new plan review fees. 4. The Building Official may extend the life of an application if any of the following conditions exist: (a) Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act is in progress; or (b) Any other City review is in progress; provided, the applicant has submitted a complete response to City requests or the Building Official determines that unique or unusual circumstances exist that warrant additional time for such response and the Building Official determines that the review is proceeding in a timely manner toward final City decision; or (c) Litigation against the City or applicant is in progress, the outcome of which may affect the validity or the provisions of any permit issued pursuant to such application. G. Section 105.3.3, Fully complete application, is added and reads: In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant's rights shall vest when a fully complete building permit application is filed. A fully complete building permit application is an application executed by the owners of the property for which the application is submitted or the duly authorized agent(s) for such owners, containing each and every document required under the terms of these ordinances and the IBC and is substantially complete in all respects. It is anticipated that minor changes or revisions may be required and are frequently made in the course of any building application review process, and such minor revisions or changes shall not keep an application from being deemed complete if a good faith attempt has been made to submit a substantially complete application containing all required components. Where required, the application and supporting Packet Pg. 109 Attachment D 7.1.f documents shall be stamped and/or certified by the appropriate engineering, surveying or other professional consultants. A fully complete building permit application shall be accompanied by all required intake fees, including but not limited to plan review fees required under the provisions of this chapter and code. H. Section 105.3.4, Concurrent review, is added and reads: An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing; provided, that any building permit application submitted concurrently with an application for discretionary permit or approvals shall not be considered complete unless the applicant submits a signed statement, on a form approved by the director, which acknowledges that the building permit application is subject to any conditions or requirements imposed pursuant to the review and approval of any necessary or required discretionary permit or approvals. The applicant shall solely bear the risk of building permit submittal with discretionary permit approval. If, after discretionary approval, the building permit plans are modified or amended to comply with conditions or restrictions required by any discretionary permit or approval, the applicant shall be solely responsible for any and all costs which result therefrom, including but not limited to additional full plan review fees; provided further, that any applicant - initiated changes made after the original plan review is complete shall also require payment of full plan review fees. I. Section 105.5, Permit expiration and extension, is amended to read: 1. Every permit issued under ECDC Title 19 shall expire by limitation 360 days after issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.025I(2). 2. The following permits shall expire by limitation, 180 days after issuance and may not be extended, unless they are associated with a primary building permit for a larger construction project, in which case they may run with the life of the primary permit: Demolition permits; Permits for Moving Buildings required by Chapter 19.60 ECDC; Mechanical permits; Tank removal, tank fill, or tank placement permits; Grading, excavation and fill permits; Water service line permits; Plumbing permits; Gas piping permits; Deck and dock permits; Fence permits; Re -roof permits; Retaining wall permits; Swimming pool, hot tub and spa permits; Packet Pg. 110 Attachment D 7.1.f Sign permits; Shoring permits; Foundation permits. 3. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an extension for an additional year. Provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the original building permit fee to extend the permit. 4. If the applicant cannot complete work issued under an extended permit within a total period of two (2) years, the applicant may request in writing, prior to the second year expiration, an extension for a third and final year. Provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector after the previous extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the original building permit fee to extend the permit. 5. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit shall be required, with full permit fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The voiding of the prior permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or Building codes. Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with ECDC 20.06.030 the time limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision. 6. The building official may reject requests for permit extension where he determines that modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and Building codes have occurred since the original issuance of the permit and/or modifications or amendments would significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of a new permit. J. Repealed by Ord. 3926. K. Section 107.3.3, Phased approval, is amended to read: 1. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction as part of a development before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure have been approved provided architectural design board approval has been granted and a fully complete permit application for the entire building or structure has been submitted for review. 2. Phased approval means permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer and fire marshal, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage have been signed as approved by the city engineer. 3. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the improvements. in flood hazard areas, upon placement of the lowest floor-, ineluding the basement, and prior - to fi+Aher vertioal constmetion, the elevation certifioation requifed in Section 1612.5 shall be submit4ed to the building effieiah Prior- to fiffal iffspeetion approval, the building offieial shall Packet Pg. 111 Attachment D 7.1.f ML. Section 113, Board of Appeals, is deleted and replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. NM. Section 501.2, Address Identification, is amended to read: Approved numbers or addresses shall be installed by the property owner for new and existing buildings in such a position as to be clearly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property. Letters or numbers on the building shall be a minimum six (6) inches in height and stroke a minimum of .75 inch of a contrasting color to the building base color. Where public or private access is provided and the building address cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other approved sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. This means of premises identification does not preclude approved identification also affixed to structure. AN. Section 903.2 is amended to read: Where Required. Approved automatic fire sprinkler systems in new buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.13. gO. Section 903.2.13 is added. Automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be provided as required by ECDC 19.25.035A. QP. Section 903.3.7 is amended to read: Fire department connections shall be installed in accordance with Section 912 and ECDC 19.25.035B. RQ. Section 907.2 is amended to read: Where required — new buildings and structures. An approved fire alarm system installed in accordance with this code and NFPA 72 shall be provided in new buildings and structures in accordance with Sections 907.2.1 through 907.2.24 and provide occupant notification in accordance with Section 907.5, unless other requirements are provided by another section of this code. 8R. Section 907.2.24 is added. Fire alarm and detection system shall be provided as required by ECDC 19.25.035C. T. Seet on 1617 1 1 Residential C♦r.,et res is added .,,...i reads: .SS�S!!!!1.7!!'.flP!!6S7-f. i 1.0 MI Packet Pg. 112 Attachment D 7.1.f VS. Section 3108.1.1, Radio, television and cellular communication related equipment and devices, is added and reads: A permit shall be required for the installation or relocation of commercial radio, television or cellular tower support structures including monopoles, whip antennas, panel antennas, parabolic antennas and related accessory equipment, and accessory equipment shelters (regardless of size) including roof mounted equipment shelters. WT. Section 3109.2, Applicability and maintenance, is added and reads: 1. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas of all occupancies shall comply with the requirements of this section and other applicable sections of this code. 2. It is the responsibility of the owner to maintain a swimming pool, hot tub or spa in a clean and sanitary condition and all equipment shall be maintained in a satisfactory operating condition when the swimming pool, hot tub or spa is in use. A swimming pool, hot tub or spa that is neglected, not secured from public entry and/or not maintained in a clean and sanitary condition or its equipment in accord with manufacturers recommendations shall be determined to be a hazard to health and safety and shall be properly mitigated to the satisfaction of the building official. XU. Section 3109.3, Location and Setbacks, is added and reads: Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas shall meet requirements of the zoning code of the city of Edmonds. 1. Minimum setbacks are measured from property lines to the inside face of the pool, hot tub or spa as required by the zoning code for accessory structures. 2. All other accessory buildings and equipment shall meet the normally required setbacks for accessory structures in the zone in which they are located. YV. Section 3109.4, Tests and cross -connection devices, is added and reads: 1. All swimming pool, hot tub and spa piping shall be inspected and approved before being covered or concealed. 2. Washington State Department of Health approved cross connection devices are required to be provided on potable water systems when used to fill any swimming pool, hot tub or spa. ZW. Section 3109.5, Wastewater disposal, is added and reads: A means of disposal of the total contents of the swimming pool, hot tub or spa (including partial or periodic emptying) shall be reviewed and approved by the public works director. 1. No direct connection shall be made between any swimming pool, hot tub or spa to any storm drain, city sewer main, drainage system, seepage pit, underground leaching pit, or sub- soil drain. 2. A sanitary tee (outside cleanout installed on the main building side sewer line) shall be provided for draining of treated water into the city sanitary sewer system. AAX. Section 3109.9, Inspection requirements, is added and reads: Packet Pg. 113 7.1.f Attachment D The appropriate city inspector shall be notified for the following applicable inspections: 1. Footing, wall, pre -form, pre-gunite, erosion control, underground plumbing, sanitary extension and cleanout, mechanical pool equipment, gas piping, mechanical enclosure location, cross connection and final inspection. 2. An initial cross connection control installation inspection is required by the city cross connection control specialist prior to final installation approval. 3. All backflow assemblies shall be tested by state certified backflow assembly testers upon initial installation and then annually thereafter. Copies of all test reports shall be submitted to the city water division for review and approval. 13HY. Appendix E, Accessibility Requirements, is amended by deleting Sections El07, E108, El10 and El11. GQ Appendix G, Flood Resistant Ganstr-uetiaa, is amended by addition of a ne"N, . Section G301.1(4) Where base flood elevation data has not been provided or is not available from another authoritative soufoe, it shall be generated for subdivision proposals and other pro posed developments whieh eon4ain at least 50 lots or 5 aeres, whichever- is le DDZ. Appendix H, Signs, is amended as follows: 1. Section H 101.2, Signs exempt from permits, is replaced by subsection (E)(1)(p) of this section. 2. Section H101.2.1, Prohibited signs, is added and reads as follows: a. It is unlawful for any person to advertise or display any visually communicated message, by letter or pictorially, of any kind on any seating bench, or in direct connection with any bench. b. All signs not expressly permitted by Chapter 20.60 ECDC. c. Signs which the city engineer determines to be a hazard to vehicle or pedestrian traffic because they resemble or obscure a traffic control device, or pose a hazard to a pedestrian walkway or because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic passage. Such signs shall be immediately removed at the request of the city engineer. d. All signs which are located within a public right-of-way and that have been improperly posted or displayed are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to immediate removal and confiscation per ECDC 20.60.090. 3. Sections H104, Identification, H106.1.1, Internally illuminated signs, H107, Combustible materials, H108, Animated devices, H109.1, Height restrictions, and H110, Roof signs, are deleted. [Ord. 4154 § 9 (Att. D), 2019; Ord. 4111 § 2 (Exh. 2), 2018; Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 4026 § 2 (Att. B), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3845 § 6, 2011; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010]. Packet Pg. 114 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Wastewater Treatment Plant Incinerator Replacement Project Update and Recommendation Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Phil Williams Background/History In August, 2014 City Council was presented with a plan to replace the Sanitary Sewage Sludge Incinerator with a gasification system. On April 10th, 2018, the Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed the incinerator replacement project proposal and recommended it be placed on the April 17th City Council agenda for presentation, discussion, and action. On April 171h, 2018, the City Council approved the pre -design contract with DES for the Carbon Recovery Project. The work was completed on time and within budget during 2018. City Council authorized a contract and funding with the State Department of Enterprise Systems (DES) for design of the WWTP Phase 6 Energy Conservation Project - Carbon Recovery in the 2019 budget. City Council appropriated $11,037,000 in the 2020 budget for construction to begin. Staff Recommendation After receiving this presentation from staff and having an opportunity ask questions, instruct staff to return next week with a specific set of performance guarantees and a G-max price to replace Edmonds' aging Sewage Sludge Incinerator with a gasification system supplied by Ecoremedy (Project B). The requested action at that time would be to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with the Department of Enterprise Systems for delivery of this project. Further Council action in 2020 will likely include selling revenue bonds to support the project. Narrative The Wastewater Treatment Plant currently utilizes a Sanitary Sewage Sludge Incinerator (SSI) to combust solids before final disposal by landfilling. The SSI and all of its support equipment were originally installed 30 years ago and are well beyond their originally expected useful life. The cost of operating and maintaining this equipment has risen sharply in recent years due to increasingly stringent federal air quality regulations The goal of these regulations is to bring all of the SSI systems across the country up to New Source Performance Standards. They do this by limiting the expenditures an owner can incur to keep these older systems running. Once these investments exceed a certain percentage of the original installed cost of the system it must be replaced. We are already within 5 years of meeting this trigger. USEPA does not want to see these older incinerators continue to operate. The increased cost for regulatory compliance alone (sampling, testing, and reporting) currently exceeds $125,000 per Packet Pg. 115 8.1 year. It is estimated that yearly maintenance and operation of the existing SSI is approximately $800,000. The bottom line is we are obligated to bring our air emissions up to the standards that a brand new incinerator must now meet. Our choices are limited to: 1) putting in a new, modern incinerator or, 2) using a more environmentally friendly biosolids management system. A new incinerator would be as expensive as systems using gasification and pyrolysis but these newer technologies will cost less to operate and maintain, have superior energy balances, and can significantly reduce the City's carbon footprint. City Council Resolution No. 1389, which commits to achieving or exceeding, at the local level, the goals established in the Paris Climate Accord, adds additional motivation to begin development of the next generation biosolids processing and disposal system for our regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Initial research, technical information requests, and evaluation (established via an RFQ process that included proposals from across the USA) have revealed new technologies that can significantly improve the recovery of Carbon and are viable alternatives to incineration. The City has concluded that both Pyrolysis or Gasification could meet the goal and intent of Resolution No. 1389. In addition, either technology would significantly reduce operating, regulatory, and disposal expenses. The idea of using Pyrolysis was first presented to WWTP staff in early 2019 ("Project A"). Project A involves a two-step process: sludge drying and Pyrolysis. This two-step process creates a Class A dried product and a "biochar" which are well established green renewable products. This two-step process is intended to be "net -zero" or energy neutral, and the biochar byproduct could be used in City parks and/or marketed as a soil conditioner or amendment. However, the details of Project A have since proven to be unworkable because 1) the cost as originally estimated has climbed dramatically, 2) current information tells us the process is not net -zero on energy consumption, and a new and expensive building would need to be built at the plant to house the equipment. The project team (City, Ameresco, DES staff) have remained committed to providing the City with a project that meets the goals and intent of Resolution No. 1389 while also balancing both capital costs and O&M expense. To this end, the City contracted with Ecoremedy, a gasification integrator, to conduct an initial design effort to determine if their technology could be successfully deployed in Edmonds. This effort, which we have referred to as Project B, also includes guaranteed performance language, a detailed and positive energy balance, and a commitment to a single source of responsibility during performance commissioning. Project B benefits from the lessons learned, the initial regulatory reports, and the modeling, engineering reports, and design work that was prepared for Project A. Most of this information is equally relevant to Project B. We estimate Project B is approximately 80% developed. Ecoremedy has funded half of this design effort to date due to their confidence in being able to achieve all defined project outcomes and bring additional value to the City. With the help of our project design team, we have concluded this gasification approach offered by Ecoremedy would be a better fit for Edmonds than the pyrolysis -based technology offered by Bioforcetech and Centrisys. We are recommending the City move forward with finalizing a cost proposal to implement this technology. It is our intent to come back next week with final cost numbers and performance guarantees. In order to reduce financial and operational risks, and build upon the recent success of prior energy -related projects, we are recommending use of an Energy Savings Performance Packet Pg. 116 8.1 contract (ESPC) through DES to complete the design and construct and performance test Project B. ESPC projects are delivered with guaranteed not -to -exceed pricing, guaranteed performance of the new systems, and guaranteed energy savings that are measured and verified. Governor Inslee recently signed the 2020 Supplemental State Capital Budget, which includes an appropriation of $250,000 for the Edmonds Carbon Recovery (Edmonds) Project. Another benefit Project B will most likely be provided is a tax exemption from the Washington State Department of Revenue due to the fact that Biochar is considered a marketable product. All equipment and materials required to produce the sellable product qualify. We cannot at this point state specifically what other items may qualify but we believe at least 50% of this tax burden will ultimately be exempt. Further Council action in 2020 will likely include selling revenue bonds to support the project. Attachments: Copy of SSI total cost of operations 4.12.18 2 PHW 5_29_2020 Phase 6 City Council Presentation 5.26.20 R3 PHW3 Packet Pg. 117 8.1.a todays donars YEAR vendor Orig COST (2013) 1994 See handwritten detail (can't fin $21,588 34014.06 1995 CH Murphy $12,200 (Shell inspection/repair) $6,032 RDC $29,348 (Sludge hauling, @ 50% of actual) Innovac $1,569 Unimen sand $738 X-Ray $808 (Shell thickness testing) $50,694 95 Total 77672.26 1996 HDR $1,305 (Engineering Consulting) CH Murphy $68,409 Thermo Forma $13,088.08 Eckstrom Industries $797 (Steel patches for shell) ( @50% of actual) $83,599 96 Total 124414.92 1997 CH Murphy $15,165 (Shell repair) Uminen $1,077 RDC $2,972 (Sludge hauling, @ 50% of actual) Innovac $2,167 X-Ray $370 (Shell thickness testing, 60%) Thermo Forma $166.22 McMaster Carr $1,642 (Insulation for outside of shell) $23,560 97 Total 34276.35 1998 Sound Seal & Packing $887 (Insulation) CH Murphy $57,701 Eckstrom Industries $578 Packet Pg. 118 8.1.a (Grating for top of insulation) Unimen $962 McMaster Carr $310 (Insulation for outside of shell) $506 $1,063 $472 Innovac $2,085 X-Ray $900 (Shell thickness testing, 90%) Everett Steel $470 (Steel for framing for insulation; $357 $66,291 98 Total 94964.5 1999 McMaster Carr $352 (Insulation for outside of shell) Thermo Forma $511 CH Murphy $29,559 City staff labor, cumulative $2,080 (welding repairs, 80 hours) Unimen $1,128 City staff labor 88 hours $2,288 (Installation of insulation) Innovac $2,150 CEM Corp $735 Legal fees $17,000 $55,804 1999 78214.03 2000 CEM Corp 15478.15 total 15478.15 2000 20988.44 2001 CH Murphy 50126.52 Unimen 3623.45 Thermo Forma 1076.4 CEM Corp 351.99 Innovac 6119.08 total 61297.44 2001 80865.52 2002 CH Murphy 1526.13 Unimen 1411.07 Thermal Transfer 187880 Packet Pg. 119 8.1.a 2003 2004 2005 CEM Corp Innovac CH Murphy Unimen Thermal Transfer Thermo Forma CEM Corp EMS CH Murphy Unimen Innovac Thermo Forma CEM Corp EMS CEM Corp EMS 2006 CH Murphy Envirocare Unimen CEM EMS Thermo Env Thermo Forma Innovac 2007 CH Murphy Envirocare Unimen CEM EMS Thermo Env 786.64 $2,886.34 total 194490.18 $5,461.05 225.85 $46,970.00 $58.37 $355.61 $495.00 total $53,565.88 $6,288.76 $2,052.45 $3,658.28 1814.03 $355.61 $2,021.00 total $16,190.13 $662.48 $595.00 total $1,257.48 $12,672.91 $3,419.88 $1,672.38 $962.48 $795.00 3991.26 476.55 $2,277.92 total $26,268.38 $19,001.14 2737.42 $2,855.92 $3,161.36 2185 2078.04 2002 252441.55 2003 67977.43 2004 20013.02 2005 1504.46 2006 30425.46 Packet Pg. 120 8.1.a 11: 2009 2010 2011 2012 Fluke $612.00 Innovac $3,999.41 Thermo probes $1,915.32 total $38,545.61 2007 43309.22 CH Murphy $1,588.21 Envirocare Unimen $677.60 CEM 2588.03 EMS $995.00 Thermal transfer 10286.61 Fluke 612 total $16,747.45 2008 18163.22 CH Murphy $23,269.79 Envirocare $1,735.12 Bioset $373.31 Unimen $3,812.17 CEM 715.21 EMS 995 Thermo Env 3125.92 Innovac $3,399.15 Thermo probes 2987.02 Thermal transfer $10,648.17 total $51,060.86 2009 $ 59,905.00 CH Murphy $15,265.35 Unimen $2,596.01 Bioset $13,082.40 CEM 1342.51 EMS 995 Thermo Env 5619.81 Innovac $2,204.65 Unimen CEM KE Burgman EMS CH Murphy Envirocare Bioset total $41,105.73 $5,308.75 1470.41 2976.54 $995.00 2010 $ 43,914.00 total $10,750.70 2011 11200 37725.37 11713.98 $1,029.30 Packet Pg. 121 8.1.a CEM 1402.61 EMS 995 Thermo Env 4363.93 Innovac 2655.1 Fine Line Instruments 1943.5 Ventilation Power 4990.99 total $ 66,819.78 2012 $ 67,798.00 2013 CH Murphy Bioset $408.80 Envirocare CEM $896.27 EMS 995 Thermo Env Innovac Ventilation Power Fine Line Instruments 2300.07 2013 2300.07 CPI inflation indexed to 2013 dollars 20 # of years included as completed $ 897,414 2013 $ 1,164,362 (Cost Adjusted tp 2017) Running Costs by Vendor Total Annual Avg. Annual Avg. CH Murphy $ 355,959 $ 17,797.96 $ 24,292.99 Envirocare $ 19,606 $ 980.32 $ 1,338.07 Bioset $ 14,894 $ 744.69 $ 1,016.45 CEM $ 12,539 $ 626.94 $ 855.74 EMS $ 12,061 $ 603.05 $ 823.12 Thermo Env $ 19,179 $ 958.95 $ 1,308.90 Innovac $ 35,171 $ 1,758.56 $ 2,400.32 Fine Line Instruments $ 1,944 $ 97.18 $ 132.64 Ventilation Power $ 4,991 $ 249.55 $ 340.62 Sand Unimen $ 27,064 $ 1,353.20 $ 1,847.03 Thermal Transfer $ 255,785 $ 12,789.24 $ 17,456.43 KE Burgman $ 2,977 $ 148.83 $ 203.14 Thermo Forma $ 17,191 $ 859.55 $ 1,173.22 Column Totals $ 779,360 $ 38,968 $ 53,189 Packet Pg. 122 8.1.a 1987 2013 ORIGINAL $2,550,000.00 $5,241,507.04 repairs/Upgrade $897,414.06 $1,164,361.51 2017 $5,514,065.41 $2,354,361.51 22.21 % $ 150,000 2015, 17 s $ 150,000 Blower $ 400,000 Schwing p $ 400,000 HXT $ 40,000 Sump purr $ 50,000 hopper me $ 1,190,000 Packet Pg. 123 8.1.a r Q Packet Pg. 124 8.1.a r Q Packet Pg. 125 8.1.a 1:• 1•: 1.036 Packet Pg. 126 8.1.a 1.021 1.00 CPI inflation indexed to 2017 dollars 2013 to 2017 adjustment is 1 1.052 j $ 1,224,908.31 —$53K from 1995 through 2012 (see database) Packet Pg. 127 8.1.a 42.70% ;hutdowns lump ips As Packet Pg. 128 CITY OF EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION MAY 26, 2020 These projects have been completed in partnership with: AMERESCO Green * Clean ; Sustainable WV ishingtun State Department of Enterprise Servi s Packet Pg. 129 PRESENTATION GOALS • Conduct a brief overview of the various energy programs the WWTP has participated in since 2012. • Provide a brief overview of the ESCO process • Discuss ESCO Phase 6 — including the Carbon Recovery process, Resolution 1389 impacts, O&M expenses, and the ESPC contracting methods • Share evaluation of Project A and B • Share staff recommendation and independent engineering review • Answer questions. These projects have been completed in 8.1.b EE SCO Gre en . Cleun . Su itdhiwbbe AbS rirml Glee Ocputh ..-Y 1 IS+G•# prir?er . ^rN± f++. i x.4° r �V L L 3 m «s M a CO) 0 tV to tV LO L r- 0 U U to a� 0 0 E M 0 a Packet Pg. 130 ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING (ESPC) • An ESPC is a contract between an energy services company (ESCO) and the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services (DES), under which the ESCO guarantees a not -to - exceed cost, system performance, and energy savings to the client (Edmonds). • Under this program: Major project risks are shifted from client to the ESCO. - ESCO provides single -source of accountability and enhances customer control of equipment & sub -contractor selection. • DES manages contract and provides oversight • Reduces future energy costs and uses the savings to pay for infrastructure improvements implemented today. These projecft have been cornpletsd in E1 8.1.b A1EFEC Green • Cledn • Su whiub- Waa inW4 $late ❑cput-K t.o' Enterprise Servioe! Packet Pg. 131 PLANT ENERGY AND COST TRENDS RESULTING FROM ENERGY PROJECTS $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 Energy usage & demand trending downward, while costs are trending upward due to RDC charges and rate increases 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020 These projecft have been completed in E! 8.1.b 1EFEC Green • Cledn • Su Ldhld E}'e V6inw4 Giale ❑cput-K t.o' Enterprise Seryioe. 4 a� L CU M (L M O N tD N Do Nothing Case Ul) c 0 RDC a r w— kW Costs N a� L kWh Casts a -kWh 0 Ift U ESCO Phases >, r U a� rn t d r c d E t c� R r Q Packet Pg. 132 ENERGY INCENTIVES, GRANTS, PERFORMANCE These projects have been completed in er.EEC I AbS rirml Glee Ocputh ..o' *' E IS+G•# prir?er Service! L 3 m «s • 2010 Plant staff began working with SNO PUD and entered into an Energy Challenge — since M then we have received approximately $304,000 in PUD revenue to complete energy efficiency projects. We anticipate the Carbon Recovery project incentive is estimated to be $20,000. 0 N • The project will receive a $250,000 grant from the Department of Commence. • We anticipate another round of Department of Commerce funding this year. rank very high. to N LO C L a The project should .r a Packet Pg. 133 CITY COUNCIL OVERSIGHT - These projects have been completed in 8.1.b AMERE SCO Gre en . Cleun . Su itdhiwbbe YbS rirml Glen Ocputh ..-Y E IS+G•# prir?er . ^rN± r d PATH TO SUSTAINABILITY • August 2014: Staff laid out a long-term plan in a presentation titled "Putting it all Together". The long- N term plan included a staged approach outlining a pathway for this next project. M • After successful completion of Phase 3 & 4 energy projects, we approached City Council with the M Phase 5 project which outlined the necessity of upgrading solids handling equipment in preparation for N the future Carbon Recovery. N LO r_ O • April 10, 2018: Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed the project and recommended it be placed on the April 17th City Council agenda for presentation, discussion, and action. • April 17, 2018: City Council approved the predesign effort budget during 2018. The work was completed on time and within o U U co • City Council authorized funding for the design of the WWTP Phase 6 Energy Conservation Project - N Carbon Recovery in the 2019 budget. • In early 2019, the project team began development of Project B. Project B can reduce construction cost significantly, does not require a new building, increases carbon recovery and reduces the Q environmental impact of odor control . Packet Pg. 134 PATHWAY TO SUSTAINABILITY High Efficiency Blower Project saves: 33,909/yr. and 345 tons CO2, equivalent to: 36.5 home's energy 799 barrels of use for one year I ail consumed Dewatering Project saves: $133,211/yr. and 7 537 tons CO2, equivalent to: 56.7 home's energy 1,243 barrels of oil use for one) consumed Aeration & Blower 1" Project saves: $34,0621yr. and 264 tans CO2, equivalent to: 27.9 home's energy 611 barrels of use for one yI ail consumed Carbon Recovery This phase will focus on the sewage sludge incinerator efficiency. We are evaluating options to reduce operational casts and the environmental footprint. Opportunities include clean gasification and drying the biosolids to create a high - nutrient soil amendment product. AMERESCO Greed • Cledn • Sudai wb- Y4`aa inW4 Slade ❑cput-K t.o' Enterprise Service! Packet Pg. 135 EDMONDS WWTP PROCESS FLOW E'. R 5d--RErr--15 vE frAvE R AV4 S L--J Wark 37 AGE --------------- FKRI M.0.RY CLAVIFIE R AERATK:fW Oh ;It -------------- H AIWf IS LU DGE A WSTE A{: rNATED SLUDGE 37<MAGE WASTE AMD RETURN ACTNIA.TED SLUDGE DE'AATERED SL UDG�E HQpFPER FLrJ]D4ZEo BED INCIMU ATOR DE-WArt R9D SLR}G„E These projects have been completed in tint' Lrf 8.1.b -�AMERESC Green • Clean • SuaLdhidb- V6S inw4 Giale ❑cput-K t.o' r L L 3 SiECONa4we CGARmER a+ N JF ftf i G4MTAG7 CF?FiV18 ER M a M O tV to tV Ul) r— IFO Fl6aty'_ �. EFF-UE VT R a+ C d N N d u C 7 O U r V IF= NOER t0 N Y m Len L d r i d t 0 fir' • � +�+ a AS!H SENT TO LMD FILL Packet Pg. 136 PROJECT DRIVERS These projects have been completed in 8.1.b AMERESCO Green • Cleun • Su itdhiwbbe YbS rirml Glen Ocputh ..o' E IS+G•# prir?er SeNce. r L L 3 m ca • Equipment has high O&M cost in terms of electrical usage, disposal costs, operations staffing, repair & M maintenance and emission controls - over $700,000/year • The equipment is currently operating significantly beyond its useful life expectancy — in operation 30 years. • The equipment was installed at a time when the need to reduce energy and reuse of bi-products was the no - a focus. • Regulatory burden has significantly increased with the new sludge incinerator regulations under 40CFR Part 60 Subpart O. • § 60.150 states compliance with new emissions standards must be met... "When the cumulative cost of the changes over the life of the unit exceeds 50 percent of the original cost of building and installing the unit (not including the cost of land) updated to current costs. " Packet Pg. 137 These projects have been completed in 8.1.b AMERE SCO Gre en • Cleun • Su tdhiwU%- ��'`�REGULATORY TRIGGER FOR REPLACEMENT *"'"`" • Must meet New Source Performance Standards for air emissions (USEPA) at the point where total investments in an existing, grandfathered incinerator (Edmonds) exceed 50% of its original cost after factoring in inflation *Analysis of Edmonds WWTP Incinerator repair & maintenance history shows we are nearing 43% at this time • Spreadsheet calculations for this requirement are attached in agenda packet C L L ca 3 m «s eM 2 IL M O tV to tV LO 0 r- 0 U r U to a� rn t d r c m E t v .r a Packet Pg. 138 These projects have been completed in 8.1.b AMERE SCO Gre en • Cleun • Su itdhiwU%- V%b;rirml Slate Ocputh ..o' BASIC OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR REPLACEMENT • Replace with a new incinerator • Appeared to be the second most expensive option after initial screening • Does not measurably improve environmental performance including Carbon footprint • Regulations on incineration may well continue to get more stringent • Build conventional digesters followed by production of EQ Biosolids for land application Most common current approach Edmonds does not have space for digesters on site • Any expansion of our footprint in downtown would be very difficult • Likely the most expensive option • Wintertime management of land application systems • Long-term costs of hauling and possibly storage are very high and energy intensive • Does not address PFAS residues d R L L CU 3 eM a M 0 tV to tV LO r_ 0 U U to 0 0 0 0 0 a Packet Pg. 139 BASIC OPTIONS AVAILABLE • Pyrolysis/Gasification options - Can produce a range of useable end products • More energy efficient • Reduce carbon emissions • These approaches have been commercially available for many years These projects have been completed in 8.1.b EE Green • Cleun • S iaiiidF�`e f++. Y4SsFiirFlSlale Ocputo' GnSGpri?eSrT� ± qv. �r' r V L L 3 eM a CO) 0 tV to tV LO • Most installations in this Country have been for organic wastes like agricultural manures, wood chips, and other feedstocks. Examples using Municipal biosolids are limited but growing U Comparison of these two approaches environmentally and financially is the focus of this presentation U E a Packet Pg. 140 OPTIONS A & B •Option A— Pyrolysis • Bioforcetech/Centrisys • Produces dry, pelletized biochar • One existing WWTP biosolids installation *Option B • Ecoremedy These projects have been completed in k r)pri 8.1.b AMERE Green • Cletin • Su itdhiwU%- *Enterprise Service! w xq° r �V L L 3 m «s M a M 0 tV to tV LO r- 0 • Can potentially produce either Exceptional Quality (EQ) biosolids for direct land application, Biochar, or U mineral intensive dry residue with little to no remaining carbon 0 One existing WWTP biosolids installation 0 0 E 0 a Packet Pg. 141 PROJECT A - PYROLYSIS •To be added These projects have been completed in 8.1.b AMERESCO Green • Cledii • SlUSAdllwbe k%bsrirgtol Glee Ocpu�r. o' fnMtuprise Service. E R � L L 3 m ca Packet Pg. 142 r CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION - PROJECT B These projects have been completed in L. rf, 8.1.b -�y AMERESCO Green • Cledn • Su itdhidbbe Y6inF4o Swe❑cput-K t.o' Enterprise Seryioe. R � L L 3 m «s t'M 2 a CO) O tV to tV LO C O r C d to N L t_ O U r U to a� rn t a c m E t r Y ",r r Q Packet Pg. 143 Utilities Utilities Odor Control Chemicals Polymer Existing Incinerator (Baseline) $163056 $47o76 Project A Pyro lys Is e ntrisys $ 193r47c- $74o92 Project B Gasification Ecorernedy $126,661 $3oOO Savings of $341,247 can provide the revenue stream to Screenings cover $5,250,000 in debt Service Labor 1 (2.7% @ 20 years levelized) Annual Maintenance $990951 $52oDDO 35oDOO Regulatory $172o183 $120,,DDT $60,000 Hauling $36oDDD Sub Total All Costs r 9911F193 $o $957P575 $36�000 $649P946 Unit Total $/yr Total $ f yr al $fyr al $/yr al $/yr Total $/yr Total $/yr Total $/yr a 'Total Packet Pg. 144 :t W Project A Project Higher construction costs. Lower construction and installation costs. $190,630 (higher than baseline) $0 Increased natural gas to dry biosolids Higher trucking and chemical costs Requires new building. Integrates 12 vendor packages. Double pieces of equipment needed. Lower startup period. $123,468 (lower than baseline) $20,000 estimated from utility Increases carbon recovery. Utilizes screenings and biosolids as fuel. Lower trucking and chemical costs. Uses existing building footprint. Meets City standards for controls, less equipment. Turn -key supplier. Single -source technology supplier. Longer start-up and commission period. Ongoing optimization included. BENEFITS OF PROJECT B - GASIFICATION Most efficient, affordable to implement and lowest cost to operate. • Produces environmentally —friendly end product (biochar) while generating its own thermal conversion from the biosolids. This will move the City closer to achieving the goals established in Resolution 1389 No acidic side stream or hazardous waste is produced • Biochar will be purchased for land application in eastern WA. The technology has been permitted by EPA as a non - incineration process in other regions. Ecoremedy successful biomass projects These projects have been completed in 8.1.b AME E Green • Cletin • SLg�iaiiiwL,%- *EnYAbS Fii�r.F.4.o-1 Slain baputh ..o' bum prise . ^rN± cm f++. i x.4° r �V L L 3 m ca CO) O N Australia 6 I N 1 LO r r O PA d L a O a. E a Packet Pg. 146 FUTURE ENERGY PROJECTS • Influent pump replacement • High efficiency motors for fans and pumps • Energy management page and development of KPI's for daily monitoring -,Continued lighting upgrades • Replace effluent gravity valve These projects have been completed in 8.1.b EE Green • Cletin • Su itdhiwU%- xqT. r �V L L d rrI_ M ACTION - NEXT STEPS Request that the City Council instruct staff: These projects have been completed in 8.1.b EE SCO Gre en • Cleun • Suz�iaiiiwbbe AbS rirml Glee Ocputh ..-Y*Enterprise Service! cm f++. I x.4° r �V L L 3 m ca M 2 *To return next week with a specific set of performance guarantees and a M Gmax price to replace Edmonds' aging SSI with a gasification system to N supplied by Ecoremedy (Project B). n L •The requested action at that time would be to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with the Department of Enterprise Systems for delivery of U this project. r U co a� rn t d r • Further Council action in 2020 will likely include selling revenue bonds to E support the project. a Packet Pg. 148 a Packet Pg. 149 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Discussion of Public Service Announcement (PSA) regarding Facial Coverings Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History Current guidance from the Center for Disease Control and Snohomish Health District indicates that the use of facial coverings significantly reduces the transmission of COVID-19, especially from the person wearing the mask. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Councilmembers Olson and Johnson have been discussing the best approach for promoting facial covering use in our community with the goals of 1) community health, 2) getting our case numbers down to qualify for opening, and 3) continuing safely after the phase 2 reopening. One of the options Council is asked to consider is a Public Service Announcement (PSA) highlighting the importance of wearing facial coverings/masks. The following message from Snohomish County Health is proposed as basis for the PSA: Cloth face coverings are strongly recommended by the Snohomish Health District. They should be worn when away from home and out in public, when using transit, or in commercial and retail settings. There are many parts of the COVID-19 pandemic that are difficult to control, but reducing contact with others and wearing face coverings are actions that the community can take that make a big difference. "We have to do everything we can to enable our economy to open without a resurgence in cases, hospitalizations and deaths," said Dr. Chris Spitters, health officer for the Snohomish Health District. "People wearing face coverings are protecting you, so if you are able, you should do the same to protect others." It is important to note that not everyone is able to wear a face covering. These exceptions include young children, people with disabilities, and deaf individuals who rely on facial movements as part of their communication. Packet Pg. 150 8.2 The purpose of this discussion is to determine if councilmembers wish to proceed with and participate in this PSA and to get any input on script and where to air the message. We hope to produce the PSA at no cost; if a cost is incurred, we will bring this item back to Council with an action item for any spending. Packet Pg. 151 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/2/2020 Discussion of Snohomish County Public Defender Association Contract Renewal Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History Due to the transition in the HR Director position it was not discovered until late in 2019 that the Public Defender Contract would expire on 12/31/19. In order to allow Council appropriate time to consider the Public Defender contract, it was requested of Snohomish County Public Defender Association to extend their contract for 6 months, with no fee change. This was agreed to by Snohomish County Public Defender Association with the understanding that the fee schedule would need to be revisited prior to a new contract execution. In 2015 the City put out an RFP for public Defense Services. At that time, Feldman & Lee (<https://www.feldmanlee.com>) had been the City's public defender for a number of years. The Snohomish County Public Defender Association was chosen as the new public defender and their original agreement ran from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. It has since been amended three times, including two extensions of time, through June 30, 2020. At the 2019 contract renewal, Snohomish County Public Defender Association had requested a 15% increase in the contracted costs. The City agreed to a 7.5% increase in contract costs. It should be noted that the conflict attorneys which the City has separate contracts with, receive a minimum of $300 per case, and then an additional $50/hour based on hours worked over the minimum. The proposed rate increases for the Snohomish County Public Defenders Association would bring the average cost per case to $295 as of January 1, 2021, if case loads remain fairly consistent with current levels. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative See attached information regarding proposed fee changes and impact to service levels. Attachments: 2020-2021 SCPDA fee proposal (002) Edmonds City Council Public Defender Services in 2020-2021 Public Defense Contract through 12.31.21 Draft Packet Pg. 152 8.3.a 2020-21 Public Defender Contract Discussion in Edmonds "V91, '° Brief history: In 2018, SCPDA requested a 15% increase in compensation for 2019 due to increased costs and added services (see top of next page for table of 2019 rates). The City countered with a smaller increase for 2019 and indicated that full consideration would be offered in 2020. The change in personnel with the City pushed that consideration time until now. Given we are already in March 2020, it was suggested that SCPDA and the City discuss 2020 and 2021 for the next contract period. SCPDA is proposing incremental progress toward increased compensation for 2020 and 2021. For 2020, SCPDA is requesting a 12.5% increase and reallocating the increase to target investigation services = $29,548.42 per month. For 2021, SCPDA is requesting an additional 7.5% increase = $31,764.42 per month. SCPDA 2020 Annual Expense Monthly Expense Monthly Expense prorating Jan to June 2020 o July to Dec 2020 Attorney compensation $200,000 $16,666.67 Investigator services $39,000 $3,250 Administrative costs $115,581.14 $9,631.75 Total $354,581.14 $29,548.42 $ $32,831.57 The difference between the 2019 rate and the 2020 rate is $ $3,283.15 per month. For 2020, SCPDA requests to be compensated January to June 2020 = $ $3,283.15 x 6 = $ $19,698.90 flat rate (January to June). The payment could also be prorated from July to Dec 2020 increasing the monthly rate to $ $32,831.57 (starting in July.) SCPDA 2021 7.5% Annual Expense Monthly Expense Attorney compensation $215,000 $17,916.67 Investigator services $41,925 $3,493.75 Administrative costs $124,249.72 $10,354.14 Total $381,174.72 $31,764.56 Packet Pg. 153 8.3.a 2019 rate negotiated rate Monthly Compensation First / Fourth Quarters Escalator Second / Third Quarters Attorney compensation $15,270.74 114.3 % $17,454.46 Investigator services $1,594.11 N/A $1,594.11 Administrative costs $9,400.42 N/A $9,400.42 Total $26,265.27 - $28,488.99 Basis for the requests SCPDA has increased costs starting in 2019 due to the following reasons: • Two additional staff investigators • Two additional staff social workers • Renewed lease (20% increase in rent in 2019 and an additional 10% in 2020) o The lease was converted from a full -service lease to triple net lease (i.e., SCPDA is now paying its portion of operational expenses.) The operational expenses have an annual escalator, but the increases have an annual cap. o On average, SCPDA pays $15 per square foot plus operating expenses which is remains a competitive rental rate. • Database and analytics • Regular increases to the salary scales SCPDA is a non-profit organization. All our income is invested in our staff and operations SCPDA provides quality services at an efficient cost rate. The previous agreement did not predict costs. For example, in 2019, the City paid SCPDA $19,129.32 for investigation services. SCPDA conducted 142 investigations. The average revenue was $134.71 per case for investigation services. The prior agreement also did not adjust the compensation for investigation services if there was an increase in workload. In 2019, there were more assignments than projected and the contract did not adequately fund the necessary services. This proposal increases the compensation for investigation services. The City's Public Defender Auditor, Bob Boruchowitz noted in his 2019 Annual Report that..."I think the investigation rate should be somewhat higher..." 2019 Public Defender Report, dated January 20, 2020, page 2. To perform more investigations, SCPDA needs more resources. Mr. Boruchowitz also encouraged more social worker services. "As I wrote a year ago, an investment in increased social work staff for the Defender could very well yield financial gains both in terms of reduced jail costs and in reduced recidivism, and could help provided needed support services to clients." Id. page 3. Again, these resources require funding, but are worthy investments in services. Packet Pg. 154 8.3.b E O O c U) 4- 0 c O y 3 V fA N O N O N O N C N U d cn L ci iL .0 C O U w U c O E W C O E t v R r Q Packet Pg. 155 8.3.b 91963 Gideon v. Wainwright SCPDA formed O 1973 2011 Wilbur v. Cities of Burlington and Mount Vernon c2019 :One-year extension Three-year contract with SCPDA 2020 6-month 2016 contract extension to negotiate E 0 0 c U) 4- 0 c 0 y 3 V fA Packet Pg. 156 8.3.b ► Two additional staff investigators ► Two additional staff social workers ► Acquired new database and increased data analytics ► Regular increases to salary scales ► Renewed office lease (20% increase in 2019 and an additional 10% increase in 2020) No. On average, we pay $15 per square foot plus operating expenses which remains a competitive rate E 0 M 0 c U) 4- 0 c 0 y 3 V fA Packet Pg. 157 8.3.b • Takes longer to resolve cases • Cases are continued to complete investigation or fulfill social work needs. • Clients are in jail longer. • Workloads grow: divided attention across 1 10 to 150+ open cases per attorney creates a whirlwind of day to day tasks and there is insufficient time to spend on the concentrated work needed to move the case forward. • Burnout • Frustration from work needed to be accomplished versus time to accomplish it. • Leads to underperformance and/or resignations for other employment opportunities. E 0 M 0 c U) 4- 0 c 0 y 3 0 W Packet Pg. 158 8.3.b ► Better efficiency o Fewer continuances o Cases will resolve sooner o Information provided to prosecutor, court, and probation sooner ► More confidence in outcomes o Fewer cases reversed on appea o Less pretrial confinement ► Retain dedicated public defenders o Reduce attrition o Attract new talent ti .ore support Reduced suppo 1 E 0 0 c 4- 0 c 0 y 3 V fA Packet Pg. 159 8.3.b 1 In 2019, the contract paid $15,270.74 - $19,129.32 for investigation g $1,594.1 1 $9,400.42 services. $26,265.27 SCPDA conducted 142 investigations in 2019. Compensation This resulted in $134.71 per $16,666.67 case for investigations $3,250 services. $9,631.75 $29,548.42 • •' I Assuming similar numbers $17,916.67 of investigation referrals, $3,493.75 the 2020 rate is estimated $10,354.14 at $205 per case and 2021 $31,764.56 rate is $295 per case. E 0 M 0 c U) 4- 0 c 0 .N N 7 V fA Packet Pg. 160 8.3.b Slide 6 M Kathleen Kyle, 5/18/2020 E 0 t 0 c CO 4- 0 c 0 .N N 7 V N a N O N O N O N C .y d V d L a c 0 U .r U c 0 E LU c m E t v a r r Q Packet Pg. 161 8.3.b Kathleen Kyle kkyle@snocopda.orq 1 425-339-6310 E 0 0 c U) 4- 0 c 0 y 3 V fA N O N 6 N O N C N U d U) L ci IL c 0 U w U 0 E W E a Packet Pg. 162 8.3.c CITY OF EDMONDS CONTRACT NO. AGREEMENT FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES This Agreement is entered into between the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation, ("City") and the Snohomish County Public Defender Association ("Contractor"). I. DEFINITIONS A. Attorney. Attorneys shall mean attorneys working for the Snohomish County Public Defender Association, and where appropriate, shall include Rule 9 interns. B. Case. A Case shall mean the filing of a document with the court naming a person as defendant or respondent, to which an Attorney is appointed in order to provide representation. In courts of limited jurisdiction multiple citations from the same incident can be counted as one case. C. Contractor. Contractor shall mean the Snohomish County Public Defender Association, and shall mean each attorney working for the Contractor. D. Defendant. Defendant shall mean a person charged with a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense that is filed by the City into the Edmonds Municipal Court, and for whom the Contractor must provide services pursuant to Section III of this Agreement. 1I. DURATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2021, unless extended or terminated earlier in a manner permitted by this Agreement. III. SCOPE OF WORK AND DUTIES OF CONTRACTOR L A. Criminal Defense Representation — To Whom Provided. Except in cases in which a conflict N of interest exists, Contractor shall provide criminal defense representation to the following: M N r All Defendants for which the Contractor has been appointed by the Edmonds Municipal a Court or City as attorney of record pursuant to the Court's or City's determination of c indigence of the defendant. y 2. All suspects who are permitted access to a public defender while detained pursuant to an investigation for any gross or simple misdemeanor being investigated by the City of Edmonds Police Department, including, but not limited to: the offenses of driving under the influence (RCW 46.61.502), driving under twenty-one consuming alcohol (RCW 46.61.503) or physical control of a vehicle under the influence (RCW 46.61.504) for the purposes of consulting with the Contractor prior to deciding whether to provide a sample of breath or blood. 3. All persons who are not represented by private counsel and who appear for arraignment in the Edmonds Municipal Court shall be entitled to an explanation of the rights, information regarding maximum and minimum penalties if convicted and information regarding the process and handling of the matter by the Edmonds Municipal Court. Packet Pg. 1 3 8.3.c 4. All Defendants who, while in the custody of the Snohomish County Jail or City of Lynnwood Jail who are not represented by private or conflict counsel, who appear in court on charges filed by the City of Edmonds, shall be entitled to the same level of contact as described above in subsection 3. B. Provisional and Ternwrary Appointments. Contractor shall be available to provide limited representation on behalf of otherwise unrepresented Defendants at arraignments and during in - custody hearings despite said Defendant not being appointed pursuant to a determination of indigence. If Contractor is appointed to a case pursuant to determination of indigence at an arraignment or in -custody hearing, Contractor should not recommend a Defendant plead guilty without first having reviewed discovery from the prosecuting attorney and adequately discussed the case in private with the Defendant and any witnesses the Contractor deems necessary to make such recommendation. C. Representation Provided to Defendants Investigated for Gross Misdemeanor or Misdemeanor Crimes. Current contractor shall be available 24 hours per day, seven days per week, by telephone for the purposes of providing representation to otherwise unrepresented suspects or Defendants who are in custody and under investigation for any gross or simple misdemeanor being investigated by the City of Edmonds Police Department, including, but not limited to: driving under the influence (RCW 46.61.502), driving under twenty-one consuming alcohol (RCW 46.61.503), physical control of a vehicle under the influence (RCW 46.61.504) or any other misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor. Contractor shall provide the Edmonds Police Department with telephone numbers of its attorneys that provide direct access to the attorneys, and shall keep such telephone numbers up to date. Contractor may designate times in which specific attorneys may be reached, and shall provide the numbers of alternate attorneys if the designated attorney cannot be reached. D. Duration of Representation of Defendant. In cases in which the Contractor is appointed as attorney of record, and unless Contractor is permitted by the court to withdraw at an earlier time, Contractor shall represent the defendant at all stages of the criminal process, from the time of appointment as attorney of record through the appeals process (provided that funding for appeals beyond superior court shall be pursuant to the terms of Title 15 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure), as well as during any period in which the court retains jurisdiction over the terms and conditions of any sentence or deferral. E. Anticipated Attorney Caseload. The parties anticipate that 650 cases will be assigned to Contractor annually and that one and three quarter attorney positions be assigned to these cases. F. Fundraisina. Contractor will assist the City in raising funds to assist with the costs of its public defense services. Such assistance will include, but may not be limited to, applying for State grant funds. The City will make all reasonable efforts necessary to assist Contractor in this regard. IV. APPEARANCE AT HEARINGS c` N Contractor shall appear at all hearings scheduled by the Edmonds Municipal Court in which it a represents Defendants, as well as all arraignment calendars and all in -custody calendars. E Contractor shall provide a sufficient number of attorneys at the various court calendars to ensure r that Defendants have a sufficient amount of time to consult with the Contractor's attorneys prior Q to each defendant's case being heard, and to ensure that the court calendars are not delayed due to insufficient staffing of Contractor's attorneys at the calendars. Packet Pg. 1 47 9 8.3.c V. REPRESENTATION OF DEFENDANTS WHILE ON THE RECORD Contractor shall be with and actively representing an appointed Defendant at all times while the appointed Defendant's case is considered on the court record, and shall adequately inform the Defendant of the developments in his or her case such that the Defendant proceeds during any court hearing in a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary manner. VI. DEFENDANT ACCESS TO CONTRACTOR A. Contact Prior to Court Hearinas. Contractor shall be available to appointed Defendants to ensure that appointed Defendants are provided with effective assistance of counsel. Defendant access to the Contractor prior to court hearings is paramount. Contractor shall endeavor to confer with appointed Defendants about cases prior to court hearings. B. Toll Free Calls. Appointed Defendants shall be provided access to the Contractor by means of a toll -free local call made available by the Contractor. C. Time to Respond. Contractor shall respond to defendant inquiries within a reasonable time to ensure the effective assistance of counsel, whether such inquiries are received by letter, telephone, email, or otherwise. D. Local Office Required. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain an office at its current location or within 5 miles of either the Edmonds Municipal Court or the City of Edmonds. The office of the Contractor shall accommodate confidential meetings with Defendants, shall be equipped with telephone, facsimile, and internet services, shall receive adequate cellular telephone service, and shall be the location at which mail and service of process is received. E. Availability for and Contact with In -Custody Defendants. Contractor shall evaluate the cases o of all appointed Defendants in the custody of the Snohomish County Jail or City of Lynnwood $ Jail prior to the time of the Defendant's trial, and shall meet with such in -custody Defendants as c the Contractor deems appropriate for providing effective assistance of counsel. At a minimum, Contractor shall meet with all appointed misdemeanant Defendants who are in -custody within two (2) business days of the Contractor being notified of its appointment as that defendant's N legal representative. In addition, Contractor shall schedule no less than two periods of time each week in which to meet with appointed Defendants who are in the custody of the Snohomish 3 County Jail or City of Lynnwood Jail. These two periods of time shall be for the purposes of 0 responding to inmate requests, responding to letters and telephone calls, and preparing for the defense of the jailed Defendants. These two periods shall be separate in time, not necessarily in M days, from court hearings held at the Snohomish County Jail or City of Lynnwood Jail. o VII. QUALITY OF REPRESENTATION Contractor shall provide services in a professional and skilled manner consistent with Washington's Rules of Professional Conduct, applicable case law, the Constitutions of the United States and Washington, and the court rules that define the duties of counsel and the rights of defendants. Contractor shall be familiar with and comply with the New Standards for Indigent Defense as adopted by the Washington State Supreme Court on June 15, 2012, and as thereafter amended (hereafter "the Indigent Defense Standards"). At all times during the representation of a defendant, the Contractor's primary responsibility shall be to protect the interests of the defendant. Packet Pg. 165 8.3.c VIII. QUALIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTOR ATTORNEYS - TRAINING A. Qualifications. All attorneys employed by Contractor for the purposes of providing the services called for in this contract shall, at a minimum, satisfy the minimum qualifications to practice law as established by the Washington Supreme Court; be familiar with and follow the statutes, court rules, case law and constitutional law applicable to misdemeanor criminal defense work in the state of Washington; be familiar with and abide by Washington's Rules of Professional Conduct; be familiar with and abide by the Indigent Defense Standards; be familiar with the consequences to each particular defendant of any conviction or adjudication including but not limited to jail time, financial penalties, restitution, mental health or drug and alcohol treatment obligations, license suspensions, and immigration or civil commitment implications; be familiar with mental health and substance abuse issues applicable to each defendant; be able to recognize the need for expert services including but not limited to investigators; and be able to satisfy the terms and conditions of this Agreement. B. Training. For each attorney of the Contractor providing services under this Agreement, a minimum of seven (7) hours of reportable continuing legal education credits per year shall be in the areas of criminal defense law, criminal process, trial advocacy, legal writing, appellate work, law practice management, or any other subject that, in the opinion of the Contractor, is applicable to providing criminal defense services. If Contractor employs more than seven (7) attorneys, Contractor shall conduct in house training pursuant to the Indigent Defense Standards. IX. USE OF RULE 9 INTERNS A. Workload of Rule 9 Interns. Contractor may employ interns qualified under Admission to 0 Practice Rule 9 who perform work pursuant to this Agreement. Rule 9 interns shall remain c under the supervision of the Contractor, and an attorney for Contractor shall remain responsible N for the cases for which the Rule 9 provides services. Any applicable case load limits for full time Rule 9 Interns who have not graduated from law school shall be one quarter (114) of the case o load limit of an Attorney working the same number of hours. $ L B. Qualifications of Rule 9 Interns. Rule 9 interns shall be required to abide by Sections VII and ° VIII except that Rule 9 interns shall not be required to complete the training requirements of Section VIII, and in place of the requirement to satisfy the minimum qualifications to practice N law as established by the Washington Supreme Court, the Rule 9 intern must comply with the provisions of APR 9. Rule 9 interns shall be closely monitored by the more senior attorneys of the Contractor. ° X. DISCOVERY TO BE PROVIDED The City's Prosecuting Attorney's Office shall provide Contractor one (1) copy of all discoverable material concerning each assigned case pursuant to the rules of discovery and without charge as soon as possible after appointment. For those individuals who are held in custody, discovery shall be provided within one (1) business day. XI. NUMBER OF ATTORNEYS EMPLOYED Contractor shall employ a sufficient number of Attorneys to comply with caseload limits. Packet Pg. 166 8.3.c XII. CASELOAD LIMITS PER FULLTIME EQUIVALENT POSITION A. Caseload Limits in General. Contractor shall maintain a caseload such that it can provide each and every Defendant effective assistance of counsel as required by this Agreement. Subject to the remaining subsections of this section, a fulltime equivalent attorney position should be appointed to no more than 400 unweighted cases per year. B. Case Defined. For the purposes of this section, the term "case" shall mean a group of criminal charges related to a single incident filed against a Defendant to which an Attorney is appointed pursuant to a finding of indigence. C. Caseload Limit Reduction. Each Attorney's caseload limit shall be reduced by the approximate percentage of time the Attorney spends representing private clients or defendants that have not been formally appointed pursuant to a finding of indigence. D. Alternative Caseload limits and Case Weighting. In the event the City or Contractor determine that it is necessary or advisable to use a caseload limit that differs from the case load limits specified in this section, either party may propose to the other an alternative standard for caseload limits so long as such standard is fully consistent with the Indigent Defense Standards. If the parties agree the proposed alternative standard is fully consistent with the Indigent Defense Standards and such alternative standards do not create an undue administrative burden on either party, the alternative standard shall be formally approved by the Contractor and the City's Mayor and incorporated within this Agreement. E. Post -Sentence Representation. All post -sentencing hearings will be counted as part of Contractor's continuing representation of Defendants as set forth in Section III, above. All new clients appointed to Contractor at post sentencing -review hearings will be counted as one case, F. RALJ and Writ .Representation. Each RALJ appeal shall count as six (6) cases. Each writ o shall count as three (3) cases. $ L XIII. COMPLIANCE WITH INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS N A. Caseload Monitoring. Contractor shall continually monitor the caseload and performance of Contractor as a whole and each attorney providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall provide projections at least three months in advance regarding the caseload limits based upon the number of attorneys employed by Contractor and trends in case filings. B. Caseload Level Shifting. In the event an attorney is handling a caseload such that the attorney is unable to provide effective assistance of counsel to each and every defendant or is otherwise on track to exceed his/her caseload limit, Contractor shall reduce the caseload of that attorney, and shift the reduced portion of the caseload to another Attorney employed by the Contractor. C. Certification of Compliance. Each Attorney shall be in compliance with and shall certify compliance with the Indigent Defense Standards to the Snohomish County South District Court and the Edmonds Municipal Court on a quarterly basis or more frequently as required by the Indigent Defense Standards and in the form required by the Indigent Defense Standards. Packet Pg. 167 8.3.c XIV. EXPERTS AND INVESTIGATORS Contractor may retain experts and investigators of the Contractor's choosing as deemed necessary to the effective defense of the defendant, and may apply to the court for such services pursuant to applicable court rules. The fees for expert witnesses shall be included in the costs that the City pays Contractor except as ordered by the Court pursuant to CrRLJ 3.1(f). The Contractor shall retain an investigator of its choosing as deemed necessary for the effective defense of the defendant, this cost shall be part of the flat fee set forth in this agreement. XV. COSTS OF TRANSCRIPTION The City agrees to reimburse the Contractor for all reasonable costs associated with obtaining and transcribing trial court records for appeal purposes if such costs have not been waived. XVI. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Contractor shall maintain a database of client information sufficient for the Contractor to determine the existence of any conflicts of interest. In the event representation of a defendant would constitute a conflict of interest, Contractor shall take such action as is appropriate pursuant to the Rules of Professional Conduct. In the event the Contractor is disqualified or excused as counsel of record due to a conflict of interest, Contractor shall not be required to pay any compensation to another attorney assigned to represent the defendant. XVII. INTERNAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND ATTORNEY SUPERVISION Contractor shall establish a program for managing the performance of attorneys who provide the 3 services called for in this Agreement. The performance monitoring program shall have the N purpose of ensuring that each defendant receives effective assistance of counsel, and the terms o and conditions of this Agreement are met. Contractor shall provide the City with a blank copy of $ the performance evaluation form used and report to the City on an annual basis whether it has c conducted annual evaluations of attorneys who provide services under this Agreement. N XVIII. REMOVAL OF ATTORNEY A. Removal by Contractor. In the event Contractor determines, through its internal performance monitoring and attorney supervision program that an Attorney or Rule 9 intern working for Contractor fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement, then Contractor shall immediately take action to prevent that Attorney or Rule 9 intern from providing the services called for in this Agreement. B. Recommendation of Removal by City. In the event the City determines that an attorney working for the Contractor has breached this Agreement, the City may, at its sole discretion and as an alternative to termination of this Agreement, require Contractor to take action to prevent that attorney from providing the services called for in this Agreement or otherwise cure the breach. Packet Pg. 1 8771 8.3.c XIX. CITY CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR — CONTRACT OVERSIGHT The City intends to engage the services of a Public Defense Assessor to manage and monitor this Agreement. All reports or certifications required by this Agreement shall be delivered to the Public Defense Assessor at the address set forth in Section XXXIII below. To assist the Public Defense Assessor in managing and monitoring this Agreement, Contractor shall, in addition to providing the reports set forth in Section XX below, report to the Public Defense Assessor any disciplinary action by the Washington State Bar Association against an attorney providing services under this Agreement, and any finding by a court that any such attorney has provided ineffective assistance of counsel. XX. REPORTS OF CONTRACTOR Contractor shall maintain a case reporting and case management information system, and shall submit reports to the City's Public Defense Assessor as follows: A. Reports shall be submitted on a no less than a quarterly basis and shall be a condition of payment pursuant to Section XXVII. B. Reports shall contain the following information: 1. The names of defendants to which Contractor was appointed during the reporting period, the charges, and the associated case numbers; 2. The date of appointment; 3. The case weight assigned to the case if a case weighting system has been approved and implemented; 4. The number of appellate level cases pending; 5. Copies of the most recent Indigent Defense Standards Certifications filed with the Court by each Attorney providing services under this Agreement; 6. Information on Contractor's caseload distribution; $ 7. Information on Contractor's case supervision; c 8. The number of pending trials and the type(s) of charges to be addressed in each; N 9. The number of substantive motions undertaken; M 10. The number of hours spent by each attorney on each of their cases; 11. Information on the use of investigators; 12. Information on the use of expert witnesses; 13. Information on consultations with the Washington Defender Association immigration staff or with a similar immigration expert; and 14. Information on the disposition of concluded cases. C. Contractor shall not be required to compromise any attorney -client privilege (RCW 5.60.060) or Client Confidentiality (RPC 1.6) when providing these reports. However, because it is necessary for the effective management and monitoring of this Agreement, it is understood that the Public Defense Assessor is intended to be part of the confidential relationship with the Contractor and the clients it represents. The Public Defense Assessor's communications with the City in relation to the monitoring and reporting obligations of this Agreement shall comply with the requirements of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including RPC 1.6. Packet Pg. 169 8.3.c XXI. COMPLAINTS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION A. Complaints Directed to Public Defense Assessor. Any unresolved complaints regarding Contractor or an attorney or Rule 9 intern providing services pursuant to this Agreement, whether received by the City, the Contractor, or the Court, shall be directed to the Public Defense Assessor. B. Investigation. In the event a complaint is received by or directed to the Public Defense Assessor and is not timely resolved by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the complainant, the Public Defense Assessor will investigate the complaint by reviewing the complaint, discussing the matter with the complaining party, discussing the matter with the Contractor, and determining whether a violation of this Agreement has occurred. The Public Defense Assessor may consult with legal counsel or another expert as deemed necessary in order to resolve the complaint. In addition, the Public Defense Assessor may consult with the Washington State Bar Association when appropriate. C. Corrective Action Plan or Termination. In the event the Public Defense Assessor determines that a violation has occurred, he or she may develop a corrective action plan or terminate this Agreement in the event it is determined that termination is appropriate. Contractor shall cooperate in any investigation of a complaint, and any corrective action plan developed by the Public Defense Assessor. XXII. TERMINATION A. For Cause. The City or the Contractor may terminate this Agreement immediately in the event the other party breaches the Agreement and such breach is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the injured party in a timely manner after notice of breach has been provided to the other party. Each and every term of this Agreement is material. The failure of any party to comply with any term of this Agreement shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. B. For Reasons Beyond Control of Parties. Either party may terminate this Agreement without recourse by the other where performance is rendered impossible or impracticable for reasons beyond such party's reasonable control such as, but not limited to, acts of nature; war or warlike operations; civil commotion; riot; labor dispute including strike, walkout, or lockout; sabotage; N or superior governmental regulation or control. C. Without Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause upon giving the non -terminating party not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior written notice. XXIII. CONTINUATION OF REPRESENTATION AFTER TERMINATION In the event of termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall continue representation of Defendants to whom Contractor was assigned prior to the termination until such time as another defense attorney has been appointed to represent such Defendants. Upon reassignment of such Defendants to another defense attorney, Contractor shall promptly deliver all related client files to such defense attorney. Except in cases in which the Contractor is unable to provide services in conformance with this Agreement, Contractor shall not submit to the court a motion to withdraw from representing defendants to which the Contractor was assigned until such time as new counsel has submitted a motion to substitute counsel. For each case in which Contractor makes one or more in -court appearances with a Defendant, not including appearances that consist solely of successful continuance motions, the City shall pay Contractor a one time payment of one hundred and fifty dollars for all post termination services provided in the case. Packet Pg. 170 8.3.c XXIV. NON-DISCRIMINATION Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, nationality, sexual orientation, color, creed, disability, age, religion or any other state or federal protected category in the hiring of employees or the provision of services pursuant to a contract with the City. XXV. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described in Exhibit A attached and incorporated by this reference. XXV I . INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, and employees harmless from any and all claims whatsoever related to or arising from the performance of the Contractor's obligations pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to claims arising out of the errors and omissions of the Contractor relating to the representation or lack of representation of clients, and/or by reason of accident, injury, or death caused to any persons or property of any kind occurring during the performance or lack thereof of the work required by this Agreement, or traveling to or from any place to perform the work required by this Agreement, except to the extent they are caused by the sole negligence of the City. The failure of Contractor to carry insurance in a quantity sufficient to defend a claim or lawsuit, or cover any judgment that results, shall not operate to limit Contractor's indemnification or defense of the City. This indemnification section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. XXVII. COMPENSATION A. Payment for Services. a. July — December 2020. The City shall provide to Contractor for services rendered 2 L under this Agreement the sum of TWENTY-NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ° FORTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND FORTY-TWO CENTS ($29,548.42) per month from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. Of this sum, SIXTEEN THOUSAND N SIX HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX DOLLARS AND SIXTY-SEVEN CENTS ($16,666.67) is paid for attorney compensation, THREE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($3,250.00) is paid for the 0 provision of investigator services, and NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY-ONE DOLLARS AND SEVENTY-FIVE CENTS ($9,631.75) is paid for M administrative expenses. b. 2021. The City shall provide to Contractor an increase of 7.5% for 2021 for services rendered under this Agreement. This includes the sum of THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR DOLLARS AND FIFTY-SIX CENTS ($31,764.56) per month from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. Of this sum, SEVENTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTEEN DOLLARS AND SIXTY-SEVEN CENTS ($17,916.67) is paid for attorney compensation, THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-THREE DOLLARS AND SEVENTY-FIVE CENTS ($3,493.75) is paid for the provision of investigator services, and TEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR DOLLARS AND FOURTEEN CENTS ($10,354.14) is paid for administrative expenses. 9 1 Packet Pg. 171 8.3.c These payments shall be full compensation for all services and material necessary to accomplish the objectives of this Agreement, including but not limited to administrative costs associated with providing legal representation. These administrative costs include, but are not limited to: travel, telephones, law library, including electronic legal research; financial accounting; case management systems; computers and software; office space and supplies; training; meeting the reporting requirements imposed by this Agreement; and other costs necessarily incurred in the day-to-day management of this Agreement. Contractor shall bill the City each month for services rendered herein. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the Contractor's compensation shall be prorated based upon the days which have elapsed between the effective date of the termination and the first day of the month after termination. B. Billing. Contractor shall bill the City, in care of the Mayor or designee, on the first day of the month, or the first workday thereafter for the monthly installment set forth in subsection A of this section, and any transcription costs as permitted by this Agreement. C. Payment. The City shall make payments within 30 days of receipt of Contractor's bill. Except as provided elsewhere in this Agreement, the payment set forth in this section shall be inclusive of administrative costs, support costs, and all costs associated with the conduct of the Contractor's business. D. Caseload Adjustments: The following formula protects the City and the Association from having individual attorney caseloads exceed the mandatory maximum of 400 cases as set by the Supreme Court in the Criminal Rule for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction 3.1 (CrRLJ 3.1), adopting Standard for Indigent Defense 3.4. Its application would keep individual attorney caseloads almost uniformly within the 300 to 400 range. In addition it keeps the City and Association in compliance with the Washington State Bar Association standards. Standard Three calls for a misdemeanor caseload of 300 cases. A misdemeanor caseload may adjusted to no more than 400 cases, depending upon: • The caseload distribution between simple misdemeanors and complex misdemeanors; or • Jurisdictional policies such as post -filing diversion and opportunity to negotiate resolution of large number of cases as non -criminal violations; • Other court administrative procedures that permit a defense lawyer to handle more cases. The attorney caseloads will be adjusted at the end of each calendar quarter in accordance with the following formula, and the attorney compensation shall be adjusted as indicated: Case Referrals Prior Quarter 75 Case Referrals 100 Case Referrals 125 Case Referrals 150 Case Referrals _ 175 Case Referrals 200 Case Referrals i 225 Case Referrals 250 Case Referrals 275 Case Referrals Attorney Caseloads Attorney Compensation _I Adjustment 1.00 Attorney Caseload 57.25% 1.25 Attorney Caseloads 71.5% 1.50 Attornev Caseloads 1 85.75% 1.75 Attoniq Caseloads _ Remains 2.00 Attorney Caseloads 1 114.3% 2.25 Attorney Caseloads 128.6% 2.50 Attorney Caseloads 1 143% 2.75 Attorney Caseloads 157.25% 3.00 Attorney Caseloads 171.5% r M 0 T N 10 1 Packet Pg. 172 8.3.c XXVIII. SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED Except in extraordinary circumstances or as temporarily necessary to avoid violation of the Indigent Defense Standards, Contractor shall not subcontract with another attorney or law firm to provide the services required herein. Contractor shall remain directly involved in and responsible for the representation of all assigned defendants. XXIX. ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED No assignment or transfer of this Agreement or of any interest in this Agreement shall be made by either of the parties, without prior written consent of the non -assigning party. XXX. AGREEMENT APPLICABLE TO ALL EMPLOYEES AND VOLUNTEERS The terms of this Agreement shall apply to all persons who are employed by, or who volunteer for, the Contractor, including but not limited to attorneys, interns, paralegals, office assistants, secretaries, and investigators. XXXI. STATUS OF CONTRACTOR AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AND NOT EMPLOYEE This Agreement calls for the performance of the services of Contractor as an independent o contractor and Contractor will not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. o Contractor shall secure at its own expense and be responsible for any and all payment of income cn tax, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, o worker's compensation, and all other payroll deductions for the Contractor and its officers, c agents, and employees and the costs of all professional or business licenses in connection with N the services to be performed hereunder. Contractor shall be solely responsible for any and all N claims or lawsuits filed against Contractor by personnel employed by the Attorney related to the o conditions or terms of employment by the Contractor, and the Contractor shall defend, $ indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its employees and officers from any such claims or c lawsuits. Contractor further agrees that its employees are not considered employees of the City for the purposes of participating in any state or federal program, including but not limited to the retirement program provided by the Washington Department of Retirement Services, and in the N event that a claim is made to the contrary by any employee or volunteer of the Contractor, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its employees and officers from any such claims or lawsuits and shall pay all awards ordered against the City for such ° claims or lawsuits. XXXII. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Contractor may be requested to perform additional services beyond the original scope of services as defined in Section III of this Agreement. Such work will be undertaken only upon written authorization of the City based upon an agreed amount of compensation. XXXIII. NOTICES All notices and other written documentation shall be sent to the parties at the following addresses unless otherwise requested in writing: Packet Pg. 173 8.3.c City of Edmonds: Contractor: Public Defense Assessor Snohomish County Public Defender Association c/o Mayor's Office 2722 Colby Avenue, Suite 200 121 Fifth Ave. N Everett, WA 98201 Edmonds, WA 98020 XXXIV. ENTIRE AGREEMENT — AMENDMENTS This instrument contains the entire Agreement between the parties for the contemplated work and services to commence July 1, 2020, and it may not be enlarged, modified, altered, or amended except in writing signed and endorsed by the parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to preclude any party from seeking modification of any term contained herein should an unforeseen and material circumstance arise. Any proposed modification shall be first presented to the other party for review and approval. Any agreement between the parties sequent to this Agreement must be executed with identical formality as this Agreement, otherwise the same shall not be enforceable. XXXV. DUPLICATE ORIGINALS This Agreement is executed in duplicate originals. XXXVI. EFFECTIVE DATE The terms of this Agreement shall take effect on July 1, 2020. WHEREFORE, the parties agree to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth above. DATED this day of CITY OF EDMONDS Michael Nelson, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 2020. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AVCIATION Kathleen Kyle, anaging irector 0 T N Packet Pg. 174 l? 8.3.c EXHIBIT A INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICES AGREEMENTS Insurance Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Professional Liability profession. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance insurance appropriate to Contractor's Contractor shall maintain the following insurance limits: I. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for o Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: $ L 1. Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance naming the City as an additional insured. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Z. Contractor's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. 3. City of Edmonds shall be named as an additional insured on all policies (except Professional Liability) as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Contractor and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all required insurance policies. The Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance shall also contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. 13 1 Packet Pg. 175 8.3.c EXHIBIT A (Continued) D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANIL E. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before commencement of the work. F. Subcontractors Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein for Contractor. 14 1 Packet Pg. 176