Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007.01.16 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA Edmonds City Council Meeting Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds January 16, 2007 6:30 p.m. - Executive Session Regarding Real Estate and Legal Matters. 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute 1.Approval of Agenda 2.Consent Agenda Items A.Roll Call B.Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of January 9, 2007. C.Approval of claim checks #93003 through #93164 for December 21, 2006 in the amount of $728,556.89, checks #93166 through #93206 for December 28, 2006 in the amount of $79,337.51 and checks #93207 through #93359 for January 4, 2007 in the amount of $1,751,004.12. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44291 through #44342 for the period of December 1 through December 15, 2006 in the amount of $888,506.49 and direct deposit and checks #44343 through #44392 for the period of December 16 through December 31, 2006 in the amount of $666,345.13. Approval of Police uniform allowance checks #44394 through #44423 for January 5, 2007 in the amount of $7,578.11. D.Authorization for the Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Lynnwood and the City of E dmonds for joint funding of the Recycling Coordinator. E.Authorization for Mayor to sign Agreement for the SeaShore Transportation Forum. F.Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed from Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 for portions of the Pacific Northwest Traction Company Right-of-Way for purposes of construction, operation and maintenance of the Interurban Trail project within the City of Edmonds, and authorization for the City Clerk to record said Quitclaim Deed. G.Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between City of Edmonds and Patton Boggs, LLC - Update and Addendum #1. H.Ordinance ratifying a change to the Mayor's salary effective July 1, 2006 as approved by Council on May 16, 2006. I.Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of not to exceed $5,500,000.00 par value of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2007, of the City for general City purposes to provide funds with which to (a) repay and redeem the City’s Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Anticipation Note, 2005 and its Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Anticipation Note, 2006; (b) pay or reimburse the City for HVAC improvements to City facilities; (c) pay or reimburse the City for the Anderson Center seismic project; (d) pay or reimburse the City for energy conservation measures; (e) pay or reimburse the City for utility improvements (collectively, the “Projects”) and (f) pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing the date, form, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond redemption fund and construction funds; and providing for the public sale of the bonds. J.Report on final construction costs for the Glen-Daley Alley Improvement project and Council acceptance of project. 3. (45 Min) Continued deliberation and action on an ordinance adding a new Chapter 16.43 establishing BD-Downtown Business Zones and amending the City's Zoning Map to rezone certain property specified therein to BD categories. Public comment will be received. 4. (10 Min) Proposed Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 3608 establishing a moratorium within the City's central business district. AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved 5. (60 Min) Public Hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to deny an application by Tony Shapiro to create two new zones for the Edmonds Way Corridor. 6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 7.(15 Min) Report on City Council Committee Meetings. 8.(5 Min)Mayor's Comments 9.(15 Min)Council Comments 10.Adjourn AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved AM-797 2.B. Approval of City Council Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Linda Hynd, City Clerk's Office Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time: Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of January 9, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the January 9, 2007 City Council Minutes. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative Please refer to the attached Draft Minutes. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 01-09-07 Draft Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 09:36 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 09:47 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 01:21 PM APRV Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 01/11/2007 09:33 AM Final Approval Date: 01/11/2007 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Special Meeting January 9, 2007 Following a Special Meeting at 6:00 p.m. for Council Committee meetings, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT David Stern, Chief of Police Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 2, 2007. 3. MOTION TO REMOVE THE FOLLOWING MATTER FROM THE TABLE: CONTINUED DELIBERATION AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 16.43 ESTABLISHING BD-DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ZONES AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY SPECIFIED THEREIN TO BD CATEGORIES. Mayor Haakenson asked City Attorney Scott Snyder to describe taking a motion off the table. Mr. Snyder explained this began as the Council started having discussions via email that were dangerously close to deliberation. The intent of this item was to give the Council an opportunity to have that discussion in an open public forum. He reminded the Council was in deliberation on a legislative matter; the only notice required to continue that deliberation was special meeting notice. With regard to final action, the Council could only pass the Planning Board’s recommendation in the form provided; if the Council made significant changes, it would be best to continue the matter until all Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 2 Councilmembers were present. If the Council wished, a further public hearing could be scheduled. He relayed staff’s request that the Council via deliberation provide firm direction regarding what they wanted the ordinance to look like. He noted the difficulty with an item such as this that had been discussed over a period of time, the product changed. For final public comment, he recommended having as close to the final product as possible. Mr. Snyder referred to Councilmember Dawson’s request for information regarding a “story” approach. He began the research including gathering other cities’ ordinances but delayed completion pending further discussion tonight. He pointed out when the Council forwarded this matter to the Planning Board in June 2005, it was with very specific direction that limited the height by district based on the current ordinances. While the Council was free to take another approach/method of calculation such as stories or something other than the City’s bulk standard floor area ratio process, because of the limited consideration by the Planning Board, it would need to be reviewed by the Planning Board. Mayor Haakenson asked whether proper legal notice was given for tonight’s special meeting. Mr. Snyder answered the only notice required was the special meeting notice and that was only required because the Council meeting on the second Tuesday was committee meetings. After discussion with the Council President, City Clerk Sandy Chase gave the required special meeting notice. He explained a special meeting notice was a very specialized notice that went to persons/entities/press that requested notice. Mayor Haakenson asked Mr. Snyder to describe the difference between the Council’s ability to take public comment versus a public hearing. Mr. Snyder explained the Council was free to take public comment on a legislative matter at any time – at a Council meeting, over lunch, via email, etc. His preference was to have a record made at a public hearing so that in the event of a challenge, the legislative history behind the issue could be provided to the Growth Management Hearings Board. A formal public hearing was required by ordinance on any substantive change to the zoning code at the Planning Board level. He noted there had been multiple public hearings at both the Planning Board and the Council on this issue. Noting Item 4 indicated public comment would be received, Mayor Haakenson asked whether the Council could change their mind and not take public comment. Mr. Snyder responded that the Council having created an opportunity for public comment had an obligation to continue to do so. He noted there were legitimate reasons the Council could choose not to take public comment but he recommended unless the Council changed its rules with regard to public comment, not to make ad hoc decisions regarding what to hear or when. Mr. Snyder commented this Council had never been overly burdened by Roberts Rules of Order; it was used generally and the Rules were consulted if a challenge was made. The Council’s motion to table the matter to a date certain was a hybrid motion; a tabling motion was indefinite until the issue was removed from the table by a majority vote. Continuing to a date certain was undone/changed by a motion to reconsider. The action that would most closely conform to Roberts Rules of Order would be for a member on the prevailing side to make a motion to reconsider the motion to table to a date certain. If the motion received a majority vote, the item would then be back on the table for discussion. Council President Olson noted there had been some confusion with the posting on the web which was not required and done as a courtesy. Ms. Chase agreed that as Mr. Snyder explained, the City met the RCW requirement for noticing a special meeting. In addition to those requirements, the agenda was also posted on the Government Access Channel and on the City’s website on January 5 as well as at several city and public buildings and a special display ad was published in The Herald on January 8. It was brought to her attention on January 8 that the agenda on the website did not include the language that public comment would be received. As soon as she was made aware, that language was added to the agenda on the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 3 website. That language was included on the other notices. She summarized the statement that public comment would be received did not have the same requirements as a public hearing notice. Council President Olson emphasized the only required notice was to the newspapers and the Councilmembers. Ms. Chase noted there was a list of media to be notified. Mr. Snyder clarified this was only for legislative matters; quasi judicial matters had different notice requirements. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO RECONSIDER THE TABLING OF THE COUNCIL’S DELIBERATION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Snyder clarified the motion that was tabled was now before the Council. 4. POTENTIAL CONTINUED DELIBERATION AND ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 16.43 ESTABLISHING BD-DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ZONES AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY SPECIFIED THEREIN TO BD CATEGORIES Mayor Haakenson explained the motion before the Council, made by Councilmember Marin and seconded by Council President Olson, was to approve Alternative #1 in Ordinance No. 3622 in Exhibit 3. He recalled a motion was then made by Councilmember Wambolt to table that item. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Dawson spoke in favor of further Council deliberation as she agreed with Mr. Snyder the emails were close to deliberation. Given that the expectation was established that public comment would be taken next week, she recommended the Council not take action until January 16. She supported further Council discussion and public comment tonight as well as next week. Councilmember Marin explained he withdrew his motion with the expectation action would be taken next week or the following week to approve the first of the two ordinances. Councilmember Dawson noted Councilmember Moore would be absent from next week’s meeting and she had comments she wanted put in the record. Councilmember Moore responded her comment was that she wanted the ordinance passed tonight, noting this was not a permanent document and could be changed at any time. If the Council did not plan to vote, she could delay her comments until a vote was taken. Councilmember Wambolt agreed with Councilmember Dawson’s suggestion, noting he had been in favor of taking a vote tonight until he learned the statement that additional public comment would be taken was not included on the website. Although all the legal notice requirements were met, the public was informed last week that public comment would be accepted on January 16 and it was likely there were people who were unaware that this issue was on tonight’s agenda. Although he disliked delaying the vote, he agreed it was appropriate. Councilmember Moore requested Council President Olson arrange to have her on a speaker phone during next week’s meeting as this was too important a matter to miss participating in the vote. Mayor Haakenson asked whether it would be beneficial to have some Council dialogue tonight rather than wait until next week. Councilmember Dawson suggested taking public comment tonight and possibly giving direction to Mr. Snyder with regard to stories. She noted the information with regard to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 4 stories would be a valuable exercise regardless of whether the Council intended to make that part of the code. However, she did not want to proceed with researching that language if it required an excessive amount of the City Attorney’s time. Councilmember Moore commented if the height was limited to 30 feet, it did not matter whether the building was two stories or three stories. She preferred to have a height limit and not spend any attorney fees on researching stories. Councilmember Plunkett recalled there was testimony regarding parking in the BD1. Although he had not stated his preference as he did believe the majority of the Council was satisfied with the parking requirement in BD1, he was willing to address that if other Councilmembers were interested. Mr. Snyder suggested the Council make motions and vote so that staff knew what information the Council wanted. He acknowledged the Council may change their mind after the public comment, he preferred to develop a document that was close to the final document so that the public could provide meaningful comment. Councilmember Wambolt noted the packet contained the proposed new language he submitted that did not include story. He thanked Planning Manager Rob Chave, City Clerk Sandy Chase and City Attorney Scott Snyder for the tremendous job they did gathering the materials for the Council packet. Mayor Haakenson noted if the Council wanted to take public comment, there was nothing for the public to comment on because the motion had been withdrawn. Whether the Council took action tonight or next week, Council President Olson recommended the Council discuss and agree on what they wanted changed and not continue to put this decision off. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO BRING FORWARD ORDINANCE 3622 FROM DECEMBER 19 FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON JANUARY 16. Mayor Haakenson noted unless the Council added anything new that was not discussed by the Planning Board or the Council previously, another public hearing on this document would not be required. Mr. Snyder clarified if the Council developed something that was new and had not been discussed by the Planning Board, it would need to go back to the Planning Board. Mr. Snyder advised the motion was Exhibit 1 in the packet. Councilmember Plunkett suggested the Council dispose of any potential new issues such as parking and stories, and unless a majority of the Council wanted to make a change, everything was the same as had been discussed by the Planning Board. Mayor Haakenson asked Planning Manager Rob Chave to describe this alternative. Mr. Chave explained Exhibit 1 was the document presented for Council consideration in December combined with the map in Exhibit 2. Exhibit 3 was a new alternative that corrected errata and also updated the footnote at the top of page 7 as a result of discussion by the Council at the last meeting regarding the definition of floor height to incorporate reference to the International Building Code definition of measuring between floors. Other errata was referenced in #3 on page 2 and changes on page 12 and 14 removing notes in the ordinance. The most significant change was Item #C2b (page 10 of the ordinance), a proposal made by Councilmember Wambolt to add the language, Within the BD1 zone, building height may be a maximum of 30 feet in order to provide for a minimum height of 15 feet for the ground floor. The allowable building height is measured from the “average level” as defined in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC. Mr. Chave Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 5 explained this language would allow a 30-foot building in the BD1 zone at the street front with a 15-foot first floor. He noted Exhibit 1, the ordinance considered in December, required a setback in the BD1 zone above 21 feet. The alternative language would remove that requirement. Mayor Haakenson clarified staff’s recommendation was to approve the ordinance in Exhibit 3 which was alternative ordinance #1. Mr. Chave explained Exhibit 1 in the packet was the ordinance the Council considered in December, Exhibit 3 was alternative ordinance #1 that is staff’s recommendation. At Mayor Haakenson’s request, Councilmember Marin restated his motion as follows: TO BRING FORWARD ORDINANCE 3622, CONTAINED IN EXHBIIT 3 FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON JANUARY 16. Councilmember Orvis clarified the motion on the table was 30 feet in the BD1 with no step-back. Mr. Chave advised that ordinance was contained in Exhibit 3. Councilmember Wambolt expressed his support for the motion but did not want to vote on it tonight. Councilmember Dawson expressed concern with not requiring any parking whatsoever in the BD1 zone. She supported treating the BD1 zone like other BD zones and not requiring parking for the first floor commercial but wanted some parking for the residential. She acknowledged the market may drive this but she was not comfortable eliminating the parking requirement for residential in the BD1. COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE AS PROPOSED TO MAKE BD1 PARKING CONSISTENT WITH OTHER BD ZONES AND NOT REQUIRE PARKING FOR COMMERICAL BUT REQUIRE PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL. Councilmember Moore asked staff to comment on the size of the lots and ownership pattern in the BD1 zone and the impact a parking requirement would have. Development Services Director Duane Bowman referred to a map of the BD1 zone, pointing out there was alley access to serve many of the lots on Main Street and on 5th Avenue which provided the potential to create parking off the alley. He noted there were a few lots that did not have alley access but they were fairly small. He noted under the ordinance, 4800 square feet or less was not required to provide any parking. Councilmember Marin noted the requirement to provide parking for residential space in the BD1 did not necessarily mean it had to be provided on site. Mr. Bowman agreed a joint parking agreement was another method for providing parking. Councilmember Marin suggested the audience be allowed to comment before the Council voted on this matter. Councilmember Wambolt commented the parking requirement was recommended by the Planning Board. He preferred not to vote until the public had an opportunity to comment next week. Mr. Snyder advised deleting the parking requirement was part of the proposal before the Council at the time of the public hearing. He did not recall whether anyone had commented on it. Councilmember Dawson clarified her intent was not to approve it but to bring it back next week for additional public comment. Mr. Bowman pointed out no new curb cuts were permitted along 5th or Main within the BD1 zone which may affect the ability for property owners to provide parking. He acknowledged a joint parking Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 6 agreement could be an option. He recalled Mark Hinshaw’s comment about not having curb cuts in order to maintain the continuation of storefronts. Councilmember Orvis noted there was currently a parking requirement for commercial space. Mr. Bowman agreed this would be a change to that requirement. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of this item. Karen Wiggins, Edmonds, relayed her conversations with many business people who questioned the proposal not to require any parking for commercial uses. Commercial uses generated more people per square foot than residential uses – usually about one person for every 250 square feet for commercial versus a residence that could be one person for 2,000 square feet. She recalled in May 2003 the Council approved the parking study that found there were 500 employee parking permit spaces. In 2006, a total of 433 employee permits were sold, the employee parking spaces were virtually full. She noted there were likely other employees parking illegally downtown. She acknowledged more employee permit parking could be established but it would move it further into the residential areas. She urged the council to reconsider requiring no parking for commercial uses and at least require one space per 800 square feet. Bob Gregg, Edmonds, commented parking for residential would take care of itself as the market would likely drive at least one space per condominium. He pointed out requiring parking but not allowing curb cuts would be problematic. The reason the parking requirement was eliminated was due to the cost of underground parking and as a compromise to the 15 foot first floor. He pointed out the code allowed parking to be anywhere in the BC zone, questioning whether this amendment would now allow parking to be anywhere in the BD zone or only in the BD1 zone. He urged the Council to vote tonight and make further changes as needed over time. He remarked on parking available in the BD1 zone at noon. He cautioned the Council about last minute amendments that had unintended consequences. Don Kreiman, Edmonds, advised he had just learned of the ability to provide public comment tonight after hearing last week that public comment would be taken on January 16. He recalled the parking study stated two-thirds of the parking was private, finding there was enough total parking but not enough public parking. He noted if the Chair of the Parking Committee, Karen Wiggins, had a concern about the parking requirements, the Council needed to take more time to study it. He suggested the Chamber comment on the parking issue. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, relayed that after discussions with several business people, most were unaware of the proposal to eliminate the parking requirement. The retailers were busy with their businesses and often did not know what was occurring at the Council or Planning Board level. He suggested the only downtown use that should not require parking was a small hotel served by public transit. He described his research that found there were a lot of vehicles parked behind buildings. Eliminating the parking requirement would put pressure on business with parking to redevelop. Darrell Marmion, Edmonds, referred to the language in the proposed ordinance for the BD5 zone regarding encouraging live/work space. He understood the intent, to allow for a shop with residential space; his concern was the wording that multiple residential have the potential for live/work and that it be designed so that a home occupation can be established in the space. He interpreted that as multifamily would be allowed in the entire building with no setback. Next he referred to page 9, section 6b which stated within the BD2, BD3 and BD4 zones, residential units could be located behind commercial uses on the first floor. He noted this no longer applied only to property adjacent to residential property. With regard to the proposal to allow 30-feet in the BD1 in order to achieve a 15-foot first floor, he pointed out a 15-foot first floor could be achieved via not having a second floor or by stepping the building back. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 7 Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, echoed Mr. Marmion’s concern with 30-foot buildings. He questioned why a height bonus would be allowed for the second floor in return for providing a 15-foot first floor. He disagreed with the comment by an architect on the Planning Board regarding the volume of interior space, questioning the requirement to provide larger spaces in this age of energy shortages. Next, he expressed support for requiring no parking which would promote less dependence on the automobile in commercial zones. He recommended merchants be educated on pedestrian and non-automobile oriented zones and that the space devoted to parking could be more valuable as a pedestrian area. With regard to rooftop gardens, he recommended looking at the code from an environmental point of view. He recommended the ordinance mention energy efficiency for the 15-foot first floor. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of this item. In response to Mr. Marmion’s comments regarding live/work space, Mr. Chave recalled the Planning Board considered two options – mixed use like in the other zones or something that was more residential. Their intent was a more stringent requirement for public art, streetscape and live/work units. He noted the BD5 zone was on 4th Avenue. With regard to Mr. Marmion’s comment about the first 60 feet of the building, the Planning Board did not feel that a requirement adjacent to residential was warranted as long as it was beyond 60 feet. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the BD5, also referred to as the arts corridor, could be multifamily. Mr. Chave answered yes with live/work space but it could not be strictly multifamily. He explained traditionally live/work space had been the shop downstairs and the residential upstairs. Modern situations were sometimes artist studios incorporated into the floor but it essentially looked like a residential building from the outside. The intent of live/work was a space that functioned as a business and also provided for residential use. Councilmember Plunkett recalled Mr. Marmion referred to it as multifamily. Mr. Chave explained it was similar to multifamily in that there were no setbacks and multifamily uses would be allowed but it would require live/work space, thus it was not traditional multifamily. He clarified each residential unit must have a work space associated with it. The intent was to provide a commercial presence on the street and reduce the need for commuting. Mr. Snyder commented another way to look at it was a home use occupation without the limitations in the code. Councilmember Dawson asked what was currently allowed in the BD5 zone. Mr. Chave answered the southern part was BC until Edmonds Street and beyond that was multifamily. Councilmember Dawson clarified multifamily was currently allowed in a minority of the zone; this would expand the use of multifamily in that area but require every residential unit have a live/work space. With regard to eliminating the parking requirement in the BD1, Councilmember Dawson was concerned with removing the requirement for parking and restoring it at a later date. She noted it was easier to take something away than add it back in as property owners would have an expectation regarding how they could develop their property without providing parking. She asked if there had been any comment at the public hearing about this. Mr. Chave explained staff made a point of explaining the parking rules but the focus was on building heights. He concluded in his experience no one ever agreed about parking. Councilmember Dawson asked if there would be any problem with regard to developing expectations if the Council removed the parking requirement and later restored it. Mr. Snyder explained any established use would be grandfathered and the Council could amortize that out over a period of time. He agreed if parking were required and the prohibition on curb cuts was retained, parking would have to be provided off site or via an alley. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 8 With regard to Mr. Gregg’s comment about the current code’s requirement that parking be provided within the BC zone, Councilmember Dawson suggested the code reference an area. Mr. Chave acknowledged a follow-up ordinance would be required to update some of the references in the code. His preference would be to allow it in any of the BD zones. Councilmember Dawson asked when that clarification would be presented to the Council. Mr. Chave answered some of it would be determined by what the Council ultimately approved but it would only take a week or two. Councilmember Dawson commented the reason the Planning Board did not require parking for commercial uses in the BD1 was the height limit made it difficult and expensive and there was nowhere to put the parking on the small lots. Mr. Chave agreed, noting the BD1 was not a uniform area; portions had alley access but some did not. Councilmember Dawson observed the proposed ordinance would not affect employee parking requirements. Mr. Chave agreed it would not. Councilmember Dawson commented the requirement for residential parking was consistent with the requirements in the rest of the code. Councilmember Moore commented this was why she wanted to vote on the ordinance tonight because there were all kinds of options and this was an issue that had been studied and discussed for years. She was concerned that reopening the issue of parking would require future discussion and study and possibly another parking study since the last one was conducted in 2003. She preferred to vote on the proposed ordinance and revisit issues such as parking separately in the future. Councilmember Moore commented she did not necessarily agree with the 15-foot first floor, it may be too high. She commented it had been so long she was losing track of how things like the 15-foot first floor came about. She urged the Council to pass the ordinance and then consider changes issue by issue. She objected to reconsidering pieces of the ordinance, envisioning that process could take a long time. She referred to an article by Mark Hinshaw that supported maximum parking standards rather than minimums and that it was possible to change commuting patterns by limiting the parking supply. She agreed with Mr. Bernheim’s suggestion to decrease dependence on automobiles particularly in a pedestrian friendly downtown. A study referenced by Mr. Hinshaw found a constrained parking supply and high parking fees often resulted in greater retail activity because shoppers parked once and walked to multiple destinations or used transit. Councilmember Moore commented she was not interested in ensuring developers made a profit but she supported practical development for downtown so that vital retail could increase the City’s sales tax revenue. She noted the Community Services/Development Services Committee was asked to consider lighting for Main between 5th and 6th where the sidewalks would be torn up for utility work; however, there was not enough money in the budget for lighting. She referred to information contained in a memo from Mayor Haakenson that stated Edmonds was the second largest city in Snohomish County but near the bottom in sales tax per capita. Councilmember Orvis asked if the first floor height in the BD5 live/work was 12 feet. Mr. Chave answered yes. Councilmember Orvis noted ground floor residential was not allowed in the rear in BD1 and BD5. Mr. Chave agreed. Councilmember Dawson explained it did not make sense to exempt residential from parking requirements in the BD1, particularly as on-street parking in BD1 was limited to 3 hours. She noted it could be changed in the future for certain circumstances such as for affordable housing. She preferred to err on the side of consistency with the other BD zones. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 9 Council President Olson commented the parking study found there was 3500 parking spaces, two-thirds of which were off-street private spaces. The parking study also found 50% of the spaces were unoccupied, suggesting there was a surplus of parking. She noted one of the problems was people wanted to park in front of the store they were visiting, compared with the mall where you park once and walk to stores. She noted the BD1 zone was not very big and there were many parking spaces within two blocks. She concluded walking two blocks was not onerous. ‘ Councilmember Moore commented another problem was employees parking in front of stores. She suggested the Downtown Edmonds Merchants Association urge retail owners and their employees not to park in the BD1 zone. Councilmember Dawson restated her motion as follows: TO BRING BACK AN ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT NEXT WEEK THAT REMOVED THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BD1 AND B2, BD4 AND BD5 WHERE RESIDENTIAL PARKING IS REQUIRED AND THERE IS NO COMMERCIAL PARKING REQUIREMENT. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, PLUNKETT, DAWSON AND MARIN IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBERS MOORE AND WAMBOLT AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON OPPOSED. Mayor Haakenson pointed out none of the public comment referred to stories or floors. He also noted the packet included a request to reconsider the height exemption motion. With regard to stories, Mr. Snyder explained he gathered ordinances from a few other cities, noting most cities like Edmonds used a height limit as a bulk standard and handled interior uses via floor area ratio. He could provide a presentation regarding how a few cities regulated stories and Mr. Chave could explain the City’s current methodology and how most cities used floor area ratio. However, further questions arose such as whether basement areas could be used for secondary purposes such as heating, electrical, engineering or parking. He concluded most cities have found it unproductive to use stories. Councilmember Dawson commented stories had come up so many times and although she did not think the language would be adopted by the Council, it would provide a good perspective for this Council and future Councils. She clarified her request was that the Council allow Mr. Snyder to continue that work, not that the Council consider limiting the number of stories. Mr. Snyder commented it would require the creation of an entirely separate calculation of height and bulk requirements for a small area of the City. He suggested making a presentation at the Council’s retreat. Councilmember Wambolt explained he walked the entire BD1 zone and found there were only 48 buildings in the BD1 zone, 29 one story, 18 two story and only one with three occupied floors. He concluded the character of Edmonds was one and two story buildings. All the lots in the BD1 zone were sufficiently flat that averaging the floor corners would not allow a third floor, an assumption that was confirmed by Mr. Chave. He noted for the past several years, buildings in the BC zone were allowed a height of 25+5 feet for a total of 30 feet. The requirement for a 15-foot first floor produced the need for a 30-foot building height. He concluded this was not a height increase over the current height limit; the only way it could only be considered a height increase was a building could be 30 feet with a flat roof. Councilmember Wambolt referred to Councilmember Moore’s comment that the 15-foot first floor may be too high, recalling he had been opposed to the taller ceiling height but was convinced it was necessary. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 10 With regard to the 15-foot first floor, Councilmember Marin explained the objective was to ensure the space downtown was viable for retail; a 15-foot first floor provided approximately a 12-foot ceiling with sufficient volume for good retail space. He found the discussion regarding the number of floors silly because the BC zone was fairly flat and it was unlikely anyone could construct a third floor inside a 30- foot envelope with a 15-foot first floor. Councilmember Moore asked for an estimate of the cost for Mr. Snyder to study and make a presentation on stories. She noted if it was for future Council’s use, she preferred they pay for it. Mr. Snyder estimated the cost of the research and a presentation at $1500. He noted it would also require Mr. Chave’s time to make a presentation regarding floor area ratio. He estimated a total of 14-15 staff hours with the presentation. COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, THAT MR SNYDER AND MR. CHAVE MAKE A PRESENTATION ON STORIES AND FLOOR AREA RATIO AT THE RETREAT. Councilmember Dawson clarified a written report and no presentation was acceptable to her. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON, ORVIS AND WAMBOLT IN FAVOR, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT, MOORE AND MARIN OPPOSED. Mayor Haakenson referred to a request in the packet from a Councilmember for reconsideration of an amendment made in December regarding height exceptions. Mr. Snyder explained a motion to reconsider was required by someone on the prevailing side. Councilmember Moore advised she was not on the prevailing side, she voted against this amendment made by Councilmember Orvis. She recalled it was a multi-faceted amendment that restricted the height limit to 30 feet by eliminating building cornices, roof and deck railings, pitched roof incentives, and elevators or stairs leading up to a roof deck as well as limiting architectural elements to one. She asked a Councilmember on the prevailing side to reconsider the motion due to the unintended consequences of this amendment. She pointed out the importance of a roof deck, noting many could enjoy a restaurant on a roof. A roof deck was not allowed because a railing or an elevator was not allowed. She noted there was a glass elevator in her view corridor in downtown Edmonds that led to a private roof deck and the elevator did not bother them at all and gave the people in the building a wonderful outdoor space. She objected to the Council’s restriction of roof decks based on capricious and arbitrary height limits of 30 feet. She pointed out allowing people on roofs allowed more access to Puget Sound and promoted the small town feel as there were more eyes on the street. With regard to cornices, Councilmember Moore pointed out the decorative cornice on the Beeson building that was above the height limit. She pointed out eliminating cornices would no longer allow a cornice on a building unless it was within the 30 foot height limit. She explained limiting architectural elements to one would only allow one bay window, thus Old Milltown which has two bay windows would be restricted to one. She emphasized there were many unintended consequences and asked a member of the prevailing side to reconsider the motion. Mayor Haakenson advised the Councilmembers who voted in favor of the amendment were Dawson, Plunkett, Orvis and Wambolt. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 11 UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS MARIN, MOORE AND WAMBOLT ON FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON, PLUNKETT AND ORVIS OPPOSED. The motion reconsidered is as follows: COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT DAWSON, TO AMEND THE PLAN AS FOLLOWS: 1) DELETE 16.43.030.C.5a REGARDING HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR BUILDING CORNICES, 2) DELETE 16.43.030.C.5b REGARDING HEIGHT ROOF OR DECK RAILINGS, 3) CHANGE 16.43.030.5c TO INSERT THE WORD “SINGLE” BEFORE “DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT,” 4) DELETE 16.43.030.C.5d REGARDING PITCHED ROOFS, AND 5) DELETE 16.43.030.C.5e. Councilmember Marin suggested considering the height exceptions separately. Councilmember Wambolt advised he would not support the pitched roof height exception; he was interested in further discussion on deck railings and cornices. Councilmember Orvis made a presentation to describe why he made the motion to remove the language. He read the existing language regarding cornices – building cornices or parapet walls extending along the roof edge, to a maximum of 3 feet above the specified height limit for that portion of the building. All such cornices or parapet walls shall include decorative patterns, layering or scrolling, and/or repeating sub-elements that result in an overall appearance that is not a single, flat, uninterrupted surface along the face of the building. When such a decorative cornice or parapet wall is provided along the entire perimeter of the building, skylights and/or rooftop mechanical equipment may be provided on the roof so long as these items do not exceed the height of the cornice or parapet wall. Councilmember Orvis noted the key phrase was repeating sub-elements that result in an overall appearance that is not a single, flat, uninterrupted surface along the face of the building. He provided a sketch of a building, illustrating the repeating sub-elements that could exceed the 30 foot height limit. He pointed out under his amendment, cornices would be allowed but only within the height limit. Next he displayed a drawing of what he envisioned the code would allow, a continuous cornice as long as there was a repeating sub-element along the face of the building. He noted this created the potential for a 3- foot solid mass that extended above the height limit. He noted skylights and/or rooftop mechanical equipment could also be installed behind the cornice which also extended the height limit. He reviewed his opposition to the cornice language, 1) it allowed a building to extend above 30 feet to 33 feet, 2) 25 + 5 become 30 + 3, 3) no requirement for roof modulation due to the “along the face” language and vague language, and 4) additional building allowed behind the parapets. Next Councilmember Orvis read the language regarding roof or deck railings proposed by the Planning Board that he deleted – roof or deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above the specified height limit if the railing is constructed so that it is at least 75% “open.” A simple example would be a 42-inch-high railing that consists of a series of 1-inch-wide vertical elements space at 4-inch intervals, on center. He displayed a drawing of a railing that illustrated how 75% open did not protect the view, particularly when viewed at an angle. He also displayed a drawing of offset front and back railings, concluding offset railings increased the view blockage. He recommended pursuing roof decks as a separate issue to allow the Council time to understand the issues particularly as they relate to view. He displayed several pictures of clear railings, suggesting that may be one option to consider. Councilmember Moore asked whose view Councilmember Orvis was attempting to protect, noting the BD1 was fairly flat and roof decks would allow more people to enjoy the view due to the ability to use the roof. Councilmember Orvis answered he was interested in protecting everyone’s view. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 12 Council President Olson asked Councilmember Orvis if his research included talking with anyone who built roof gardens. Councilmember Orvis answered no, he read the code and determined what the code would allow. Council President Olson anticipated the result would be flat roofs. Councilmember Orvis disagreed, noting builders would provide cornices but they would be within the height limit. Councilmember Orvis pointed out there was no definition of decorative. He noted builders were also allowed a single architectural element, which Council President Olson pointed out could not cover more than 5% of the roof. Council President Olson pointed out most builders wanted to build something that looked attractive. She commented Councilmember Orvis was viewing these as negatives and anticipating the result would be unattractive. Councilmember Orvis commented builders would likely do whatever met the economics of their building and it would result in higher buildings. Councilmember Moore referred to Councilmember Orvis' reference to a 3-foot solid mass, noting that would not be considered decorative and would not be allowed by the code. Councilmember Moore asked staff to comment. Mr. Chave explained the idea behind the Planning Board’s recommendation was typically cornices were required for a flat roof; without the incentive for a decorative cornice, the result would be the minimum necessary which did not require any ornamentation or decoration. The Board and he were thinking of the cornices on older buildings which were a significant feature of the architecture as compared to buildings built more recently. The intent was to encourage something more decorative/artistic on the top of the building. With regard to not allowing roof and deck railings above the specified height limit, if that were interpreted to include the step-back, Mr. Chave explained it would not allow the step-back area to be used for a deck. Similarly, without a railing, a roof deck would not be allowed. Councilmember Moore urged the Council to read her memo. Councilmember Wambolt noted a parapet wall hid much of the mechanical equipment and skylights. He asked how those items would be provided within the height limit. Mr. Chave advised those features were exempted in the code; the code contained a provision for mechanical equipment and tops of elevators. Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the language was intended to encourage decorative cornices. For Councilmember Wambolt, Mr. Chave explained the intent of the railing provision was to allow a railing within the step-back and on the roof. Although he preferred not to restrict railings in the step- back, Councilmember Wambolt preferred to leave the language out and study it further. . In response to an inquiry from Councilmember Plunkett regarding the width between the vertical elements of a deck railing, Mr. Chave offered to provide further information for the public meeting regarding the minimum width required by the building code. He noted the language in the code was simply an example of a 75% open deck railing, not what would be required. Mr. Bowman noted the 4- inch vertical separation was required by the building code so that a child could not get between the railings. He noted glass would also provide the same protection. Mayor Haakenson remarked it would be desirable to be able to see through a roof top deck railing. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Darrell Marmion, Edmonds, demonstrated an offset deck railing using his fingers and the window blinds, pointing out the amount of obstruction depended on the direction of one’s view. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 13 John Reed, Edmonds, noted cornices and parapets led to height creep. The provision regarding railings would not prevent a deck in the step-back because it only applied above the stated height limit of 30 feet. With regard to a single architectural element, he could accept 2-3 but the height would need to be controlled. He referred to the 30-foot building height and while he hoped some of these features would be incorporated into buildings, it would have to be within the 30-foot height limit. Don Kreiman, Edmonds, pointed out the Council was making rules without asking any of the many architects in the City. He pointed out the importance of a railing for a roof top deck, noting many consumers would like to have a roof top garden. He supported allowing cornices and parapets to provide screening for the roof top equipment. He pointed out unless architectural elements were allowed, the result would be buildings that were unattractive square boxes. He concluded architects and builders were not only interested in making money, they also wanted to develop a unique, memorable building. Bob Gregg, Edmonds, suggested the railing in the step-back or on the roof be transparent rather than 75% open, pointing out transparent deck railings also provided protection from the wind. He noted eliminating parapets and cornices was an example of unintended consequences as the HVAC equipment would now not be screened. He suggested a compromise, a cornice or parapet that was sufficient to screen roof top equipment. He recommended the Council adopt the ordinance as recommended by the Planning Board without the last minute amendments and send the issues that have been identified back to the Planning Board for further study. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), ORVIS, WAMBOLT, DAWSON AND PLUNKETT IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBERS MARIN AND MOORE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON OPPOSED. The Council agreed the ordinance moved by Councilmember Marin, seconded by Council President Olson with the amendments on parking and height exceptions and stories was the product staff would return to the Council for public comment on January 16. Councilmember Dawson reiterated her discomfort with the 30-foot building height in the BD1. Councilmember Moore expressed her dissatisfaction with the building height in the BD zones as she felt they should be higher. It was the consensus of the Council for staff to provide options at the next Council meeting with regard to railings in the step-back and transparent deck railings. 5. MOTION TO REMOVE THE FOLLOWING MATTER FROM THE TABLE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3608 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM WITHIN THE CITY'S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Due to action taken on Agenda Item 4, potential action on this item was deferred to the January 16 Council meeting. 6. POTENTIAL DELIBERATION AND ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3608 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM WITHIN THE CITY'S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Due to action taken on Agenda Item 4, potential action on this item was deferred to the January 16 Council meeting. 7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson had no report. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 14 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Marin referred to his report a few weeks ago that the Snohomish County Health District had hired a new Health Officer, advising that candidate had been hired by another health district in California. The Snohomish County Health District Board has extended an offer to another candidate. Councilmember Moore reported on the fabulous grand opening of the Edmonds Center for the Arts that Council President Olson and she attended. She urged the Council to continue to support the Center, reminding that the fundraising effort continued. 9. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:33 p.m. AM-794 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Approval of claim checks #93003 through #93164 for December 21, 2006 in the amount of $728,556.89, checks #93166 through #93206 for December 28, 2006 in the amount of $79,337.51 and checks #93207 through #93359 for January 4, 2007 in the amount of $1,751,004.12. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44291 through #44342 for the period of December 1 through December 15, 2006 in the amount of $888,506.49 and direct deposit and checks #44343 through #44392 for the period of December 16 through December 31, 2006 in the amount of $666,345.13. Approval of Police uniform allowance checks #44394 through #44423 for January 5, 2007 in the amount of $7,578.11. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks, payroll checks and direct deposits. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2006 Revenue: Expenditure: $2,362746.02 Fiscal Impact: Fiscal Year: 2007 Revenue: Expenditure: $1,758,582.23 Fiscal Impact: Attachments Link: Claim Cks 12-21-06 Link: Claim Cks 12-28-06 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 01/11/2007 04:08 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 04:14 PM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 04:16 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 08:20 AM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 01/10/2007 03:52 PM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93003 12/14/2006 070550 HART-MYLIE, CAROLYN HARTMYLIE1023 PRESCHOOL ASSISTANT MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL ASSISTANT 001.000.640.575.560.410.00 170.00 Total :170.00 93006 12/21/2006 069751 ARAMARK 512-3776132 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.410.00 36.66 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.410.00 3.26 Total :39.92 93007 12/21/2006 069751 ARAMARK 512-3776134 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.18 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.58 Total :92.76 93008 12/21/2006 069751 ARAMARK 512-3774523 FLEET UNIFORM SERVICES FLEET UNIFORM SERVICES 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 1Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93008 12/21/2006 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS512-3774524 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 11.75 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 1.03 2Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93008 12/21/2006 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK STREET/STORM UNIFORM SERVICES512-3774525 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SERVICES 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SERVICES 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 FACILITES UNIFORM SVC512-3776133 FACILITES UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 Total :105.55 93009 12/21/2006 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 353534 FLEET - UNLEADED REG 3203 GAL 3Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93009 12/21/2006 (Continued)071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM FLEET - UNLEADED REG 3203 GAL 511.000.000.141.120.010.00 6,468.15 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL SPILL 511.000.000.141.120.010.00 1,144.10 FLEET - UNLEADED 4601 GALS 511.000.000.141.120.020.00 9,638.17 ST EXCISE UNLEADED TAX, WA OIL SPILL 511.000.000.141.120.020.00 1,648.08 FLEET - DIESEL 2000 GALS 511.000.000.141.120.000.00 4,599.00 ST EXCISE DIESEL TAX, WA OIL SPILL 511.000.000.141.120.000.00 718.40 WA STATE SERVICE FEE 511.000.000.141.120.010.00 13.20 WA STATE SERVICE FEE 511.000.000.141.120.020.00 13.20 WA STATE SERVICE FEE 511.000.000.141.120.000.00 13.60 Sales Tax 511.000.000.141.120.010.00 1.06 Sales Tax 511.000.000.141.120.020.00 1.06 Sales Tax 511.000.000.141.120.000.00 1.08 Total :24,259.10 93010 12/21/2006 069120 AST TRUST COMPANY 12-20-06 MEBT 12-20-06 MEBT 12/20/06 MEBT Corr M Correira G 811.000.000.111.100.000.00 87,524.75 Total :87,524.75 93011 12/21/2006 064343 AT&T 425-775-2525 SWITCHBOARD 11/7-12/7/06 Switchboard 11/7-12/7/06 Long Distance 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 33.66 4Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :33.669301112/21/2006 064343 064343 AT&T 93012 12/21/2006 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 66294 PLAQUE FALL BASKETBALL LEAGUE~ 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 56.20 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 5.01 Total :61.21 93013 12/21/2006 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST January 2007 JANUARY 2007 AWC PREMIUMS Fire Pension January 2007 AWC premiums 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 4,396.65 LEOFF Retirees January 2007 AWC Premiums 001.000.390.517.220.230.00 25,382.10 January 2007 AWC premiums 811.000.000.231.510.000.00 261,941.28 Total :291,720.03 93014 12/21/2006 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9307412 RENTAL FOR COPIER RENTAL FOR COPIER 001.000.230.512.501.450.00 153.55 Total :153.55 93015 12/21/2006 071440 BELLA ESTATES NW LLC 3-41070 RE: #060481 UTILITY REFUND UB Refund #060481 Bella Estates/Blachett 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 23.67 Total :23.67 93016 12/21/2006 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 061218COE WEB SITE MAINTENANCE Web Site Maintenance thru 12/18/06 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 300.00 Total :300.00 93017 12/21/2006 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 518442-03 INV#518442-03 EDMONDS PD - YAMANE 5Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93017 12/21/2006 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRTS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 159.90 SEW BUTTONS ON SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 10.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 14.95 INV#549947 EDMONDS PD - MCINTYRE549947 UNIFORM TROUSERS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 106.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.41 INV#549950 EDMONDS PD - DRINKWINE549950 BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 649.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 57.20 INV#551322 EDMONDS PD - MILLS551322 GORETEX BOOTS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 199.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 17.60 Total :1,225.91 93018 12/21/2006 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 127918 C-161 C-161 SCREENINGS PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 3,650.40 Total :3,650.40 93019 12/21/2006 063459 BYRNE SPECIALTY GASES INC 278779 00674 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 103.39 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 9.10 Total :112.49 6Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93020 12/21/2006 070903 CALENCE LLC 1526 Ad Hoc Support Billing Error Ad Hoc Support Billing Error 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 -2,720.00 Ad Hoc Labor Support39338 Ad Hoc Labor Support 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 3,740.00 Total :1,020.00 93021 12/21/2006 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY101300 ALS SUPPLIES Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.18 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 35.72 ALS SUPPLIESLY101301 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 44.65 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.97 ALS SUPPLIESLY101302 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.86 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 1.59 ALS SUPPLIESLY101425 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.30 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 25.85 Total :135.12 93022 12/21/2006 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT7232 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #7232 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 47.60 SATURDAY MORNING OUTCHAPUT7237 SATURDAY MORNING OUT~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 47.60 7Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :95.209302212/21/2006 064840 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E 93023 12/21/2006 061773 CHAVE, ROBERT 12/19/06 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES JANUARY-AUGUST 2006. CLAIM FOR EXPENSES JANUARY-AUGUST 2006. 001.000.620.558.600.430.00 348.88 REIMBURSE FOR EXPENSES SEPT. TO DEC.12-18-06 REIMBURSE FOR EXPENSES SEPT. TO DEC. 001.000.620.558.600.430.00 106.36 Total :455.24 93024 12/21/2006 003710 CHEVRON USA 789 830 518 5 ACCT#789 830 518 5 -EDMONDS PD FUEL 104.000.410.521.210.320.00 61.87 Total :61.87 93025 12/21/2006 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-660-2168 C/A 129795740 Cell phone Gene 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 41.01 Total :41.01 93026 12/21/2006 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 425-501-3636 CELL CHARGES - DUANE BOWMAN. CELL CHARGES - DUANE BOWMAN. 001.000.620.558.800.420.00 7.86 Total :7.86 93027 12/21/2006 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460515055 UNIFORMS ALS-stn. 17 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.47 Ops-Stn. 17 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.47 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.59 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.58 8Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93027 12/21/2006 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION OPS UNIFORMS460515077 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 118.51 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.54 Total :339.16 93028 12/21/2006 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5032 CRAZE POSTAGE EDMONDS PORTION OF MAILING OF JANUARY - 001.000.640.574.200.420.00 4,299.58 Total :4,299.58 93029 12/21/2006 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 4952 INV#4952 CUST#47 EDMONDS PD PRISONER R&B AUGUST 2006 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 2,960.83 INV#4958 CUST#47 EDMONDS PD4958 PRISONER R&B SEPTEMBER 2006 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 4,219.58 Total :7,180.41 93030 12/21/2006 065519 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 4TH PAYMENT REIMBURSEMENT OF NARCOTIC DRUG FUND/EDM FINAL PAYMENT 2006~ 104.000.410.521.210.490.00 5,000.00 Total :5,000.00 93031 12/21/2006 065519 CITY OF LYNNWOOD S.OFSTHUN SHARED MEDICAL/S.OFSTHUN - EDMONDS PD SHARED MEDICAL/S.OFSTHUN~ 001.000.410.523.600.410.00 91.33 Total :91.33 93032 12/21/2006 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1721814 SUPPLIES DOME TOPS FOR GARBAGE CANS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 871.60 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 76.70 9Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :948.309303212/21/2006 004095 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES 93033 12/21/2006 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1726416 005302 BIGFOLD TOWELS/KITCHEN TOWELS 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 169.53 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 2.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 15.14 Total :187.17 93034 12/21/2006 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1726214 FAC- VERSAMATIC BRUSH STRIPS, ROLL FAC- VERSAMATIC BRUSH STRIPS, ROLL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 145.90 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.06 Total :161.46 93035 12/21/2006 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1723796-1 OPS SUPPLIES soap 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 79.44 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 6.99 Total :86.43 93036 12/21/2006 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 27429 CODE UPDATES Code Book Supplements 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 1,176.85 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 103.56 Total :1,280.41 93037 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 12-06 TRAVEL COST FOR MID YEAR NATIONAL 10Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93037 12/21/2006 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS TRAVEL COST FOR MID YEAR NATIONAL 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 733.51 SUPPLIES FROM COSTCO 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 87.82 Total :821.33 93038 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630636395271 Stationery for the Holiday Breakfast Stationery for the Holiday Breakfast 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 30.42 Retirement poster (Bob Schmitt) 001.000.210.513.100.410.00 165.13 Deposit - AWC Cities & Towns 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 237.50 Econ. Dev. Director, #06-204715630649063718 Econ. Dev. Director, #06-20 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 175.00 Total :608.05 93039 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630345742425 CREDIT CARD PURCHASES MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL BOOK ORDER 001.000.640.575.560.310.00 41.88 DISCOVERY PROGRAM~ 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 27.21 FRAMING SERVICES 117.200.640.575.500.490.00 108.63 FILM ORDER 117.100.640.573.100.490.00 244.80 ADVERTISING FOR WRITE ON THE SOUND 2006 123.000.640.573.100.440.00 625.00 SKILLETS FOR FOOD PREP FOR RECEPTIONS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 64.90 11Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93039 12/21/2006 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS CREDIT CARD PURCHASES4715630624442994 JESSE CURRAN:~ 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 60.00 PERMIT FEES FOR SKATE PARK 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 490.00 CREDIT FOR DISCOVERY PROGRAMFISHER SCI CREDIT FOR DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 -119.97 Total :1,542.45 93040 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715 6301 9799 9875 4715 6301 9799 9875 Phone Accessories 001.000.310.514.100.310.00 23.90 4715 6306 5312 12874715 6306 5312 1287 CDW-D HP OfficeJet 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 464.31 CDW-D Ethernet Switch 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 116.39 CDW-G Maint Kit 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 255.93 CDW-G Diff betwn chrg & credit 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 18.72 CDW-G LaserJet 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 435.59 L/C for credit applied after billing 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 5.61 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 0.50 Total :1,320.95 93041 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715 6300 0155 8875 #4715 6300 0155 8875 - STERN 12Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93041 12/21/2006 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS STERN/MEAL~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 6.32 STERN/FUEL~ 001.000.410.521.400.320.00 28.72 STERN/LODGING~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 342.45 #4715 6300 0170 8272 - EDMONDS4715 6300 0170 8272 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-MEALS~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 112.40 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-MEAL~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 4.61 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-COFFEE~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 3.65 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-MEALS~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 79.20 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-FUEL~ 001.000.410.521.400.320.00 44.60 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-MEALS~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 170.00 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-PARKING~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 61.23 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-MEALS~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 23.97 Late Charge 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 2.68 Late Charge 104.000.410.521.210.350.00 2.61 Late Charge 001.000.410.521.910.490.00 0.34 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL-CAR RENTAL~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 199.66 13Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93041 12/21/2006 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS #4715 6300 0170 8298 - BARD4715 6300 0170 8298 LAWLESS/CRYSTAL - LODGING~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 546.49 BARD/MEALS/COFFEE~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 17.77 BARD/LODGING~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 217.88 LATE FEE 001.000.410.521.400.320.00 0.23 LATE FEE 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 5.17 LATE FEE 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 6.68 #4715 6302 2283 3263 - O'BRIEN4715 6302 2283 3263 MEMOREX CD-R~ 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 97.95 LATE FEE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.90 #4715 6302 2283 3263 - O'BRIEN4715 6302 2283 3263 BROWN ENVELOPES~ 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 -95.27 #4715 6306 3997 0997 - EDMONDS4715 6306 3997 0997 FLEX CUP~ 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 13.06 Total :1,895.30 93042 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 24492806321118000 CARD CHARGES Recording Fees at County 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 199.00 Total :199.00 93043 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630143817577 OFFICE DEPOT - SHOP SUPPLIES TAPE 14Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93043 12/21/2006 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS OFFICE DEPOT - SHOP SUPPLIES TAPE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.84 UNIT 70 - BOWLES NW - BRASS SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.78 UNIT 474 - OFFICE MAX - LEGAL FORMS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.18 UNIT 332 - LIND ELECT - TIMER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 187.90 FLEET RETURN -SUMNER TRACTOR PARTS4715630143817577 FLEET RETURN -SUMNER TRACTOR PARTS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -183.11 LONGS ELECTRONICS - CASSETT STORAGE4715630654555988 LONGS ELECTRONICS - CASSETT STORAGE 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 17.24 Total :87.83 93044 12/21/2006 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 630001918475 TRAINING Training burn supplies 001.000.510.522.400.310.00 119.55 OPS SUPPLIES & TRAINING630462211410 Stns' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 330.92 Training burn supplies 001.000.510.522.400.310.00 23.24 PREVENTION TRAVEL630462921109 M.Smith FireFindings conf. 001.000.510.522.300.430.00 731.23 PREVENTION SUPPLIES630551458112 fire code publictn 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 149.00 ALS MISC630627828884 Beardsley pers.trainer study 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 432.04 Total :1,785.98 15Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93045 12/21/2006 065891 CONLEY, LISA CONLEY1218 PRESCHOOL ASSISTANT PRESCHOOL ASSISTANT @ MEADOWDALE 001.000.640.575.560.410.00 90.00 Total :90.00 93046 12/21/2006 063507 COXLEY, BRUCE COXLEY7241 DIGITAL DARKROOM DIGITAL DARKROOM #7241 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 31.50 Total :31.50 93047 12/21/2006 065961 CRYOTECH DEICING TECHNOLOGY IN12729 STREET DEPT - DEICER (1000 KG BAG) STREET DEPT - DEICER (1000 KG BAG) 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 9,318.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 829.30 Total :10,147.30 93048 12/21/2006 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3186493 Broadband Network RFI Broadband Network RFI 001.000.310.514.230.440.00 93.60 Total :93.60 93049 12/21/2006 071436 DEPARTMENT ISSUE INC 23493 INV#23493 EDMONDS PD MOTORCYCLE HELMET 001.000.410.521.710.350.00 505.00 SETCOM KA-23 HELMET HEADSET 001.000.410.521.710.350.00 265.00 HEADSET INSTALLATION - SETCOM 001.000.410.521.710.350.00 90.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.710.350.00 20.00 Total :880.00 93050 12/21/2006 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 12/19/06 Crystal Time loss (11/16/06) paid back 16Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93050 12/21/2006 (Continued)068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES Crystal Time loss (11/16/06) paid back 001.000.410.521.710.110.00 134.62 Crystal Time loss (11/17 - 11/21/06) 001.000.410.521.710.110.00 673.10 Total :807.72 93051 12/21/2006 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS CHRISMAN DEFERRED COMP FOR ADDISON L CHRISMAN DECEMBER 20, 2006 DEFERRED COMP 811.000.000.211.100.000.00 440.00 Total :440.00 93052 12/21/2006 071435 DERBYSHIRE MACHINE & TOOL CO 026594-00 OPS SUPPLIES Marine 16 watering pump 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 830.00 Total :830.00 93053 12/21/2006 070301 DIEHL, SHARON 10-06 TRAVEL REFUND TRAVEL REFUND 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 17.96 Total :17.96 93054 12/21/2006 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 06-2699 MINUTE TAKING 12/12/06 Council from tapes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 324.80 Total :324.80 93055 12/21/2006 007252 DUNN, DIANNE DUNN7140 OIL PAINTING OIL PAINTING #7140 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 204.75 OIL PAINTING #7141 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 204.75 Total :409.50 93056 12/21/2006 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 199169 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 65.13 17Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93056 12/21/2006 (Continued)060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER INTERPRETER FEES199170 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 95.60 INTERPRETER FEES199171 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 103.24 INTERPRETER FEES199172 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 119.09 Total :383.06 93057 12/21/2006 070884 EARTHWORK ENTERPRISES INC E6FB.Pmt 2 E6FB.CtyWde Strm thru 11/30/06 E6FB.CtyWde Strm thru 11/30/06 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 150,501.17 Total :150,501.17 93058 12/21/2006 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 50256 SUPPLIES TORQ WRENCH 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.99 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.67 SUPPLIES51186 LUBE FILTER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.92 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.97 Total :44.55 93059 12/21/2006 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 73897 SEWER DEPT - BULBS SUPPLIES SEWER DEPT - BULBS SUPPLIES 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 18.20 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.62 Total :19.82 18Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93060 12/21/2006 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E231073 Pre-employment screening Pre-employment screening 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 561.00 Total :561.00 93061 12/21/2006 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00575 CITY PARK CITY PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 216.36 BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM1-00825 BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 401.62 SPRINKLER1-00875 SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 19.99 CITY PARK SPRINKLER METER1-02125 CITY PARK SPRINKLER METER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 19.99 SPRINKLER1-03900 SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 25.13 SPRINKLER1-05125 SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 25.13 GAZEBO IRRIGATION1-05285 GAZEBO IRRIGATION 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 21.70 CORNER PARK1-05340 CORNER PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 25.13 EDMONDS CITY PARK1-05650 EDMONDS CITY PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 19.99 PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP1-05675 PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 419.45 19Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93061 12/21/2006 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION EDMONDS CITY PARK1-05700 EDMONDS CITY PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 19.99 CORNER PARK1-09650 CORNER PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 23.41 SW CORNER SPRINKLER1-09800 SW CORNER SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 28.55 PLANTER1-10780 PLANTER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 25.13 CORNER PLANTER ON 5TH1-16130 CORNER PLANTER ON 5TH 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 21.70 CORNER PARKS1-16300 CORNER PARKS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 21.70 CITY HALL TRIANGLE1-16450 CITY HALL TRIANGLE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 73.56 6TH & MAIN PLANTER BOX1-16630 6TH & MAIN PLANTER BOX 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 42.26 5TH & DAYTON ST PLANTER1-17475 5TH & DAYTON ST PLANTER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 19.99 PINE STREE PLAYFIELD1-19950 PINE STREE PLAYFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 40.69 WATER1-36255 1141 9TH AVE S 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 19.99 Total :1,531.46 20Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93062 12/21/2006 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00925 LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 19.99 LIFT STATION #11-01950 LIFT STATION #1 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.70 LIFT STATION #21-02675 LIFT STATION #2 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 19.99 Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms1-03950 Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 384.56 Public Works Meter Shop1-05350 Public Works Meter Shop 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 227.70 LIFT STATION #61-05705 LIFT STATION #6 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 42.41 CITY HALL1-13975 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 353.36 CITY HALL1-14000 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 52.98 Total :1,122.69 93063 12/21/2006 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 92794 INV#92794 CLIENT#5118 EDMONDS PD SPAY CAT IMP#6594 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 78.00 NEUTER CAT IMP#6673 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75 NEUTER CAT IMP#6687 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75 Total :167.50 93064 12/21/2006 070676 EFFICIENCY INC 206427 Maint Agreement FTR Gold Recording Sys 21Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93064 12/21/2006 (Continued)070676 EFFICIENCY INC Maint Agreement FTR Gold Recording Sys 001.000.230.512.500.480.00 343.15 Maint Agreement FTR Gold Recording Sys 001.000.250.514.300.480.00 343.05 Maint Agreement FTR Gold Recording Sys 001.000.620.558.600.480.00 343.05 Total :1,029.25 93065 12/21/2006 069055 EHS INTERNATIONAL INC.24219 E5MC.Old Woodway Site Assessments E5MC.Old Woodway Site Assessments 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 8,926.20 Total :8,926.20 93066 12/21/2006 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 021512 MAINT ON COPIER MAINT ON COPIER 001.000.230.512.500.480.00 50.00 Total :50.00 93067 12/21/2006 068405 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SERVIC 9558 MRE W/HEATER MRE W/HEATER 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 311.36 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 27.40 Total :338.76 93068 12/21/2006 067599 EWING ELECTRIC INC EE-2460 C-264 CONUIT INSTALLATION C-264 CONUIT INSTALLATION 411.000.656.594.380.650.00 1,843.83 Sales Tax 411.000.656.594.380.650.00 164.10 Total :2,007.93 93069 12/21/2006 064723 FAIR, DOUGLAS 12-06 TRAVEL COST FOR PRESIDING JUDGE'S TRAVEL COST FOR PRESIDING JUDGE'S 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 55.10 22Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :55.109306912/21/2006 064723 064723 FAIR, DOUGLAS 93070 12/21/2006 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU9572 UNIT 80 - HOSETRACT UNIT 80 - HOSETRACT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 235.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.62 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.41 Total :262.03 93071 12/21/2006 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0061948 WATER INVENTORY - W-VALVCI-02-010 WATER INVENTORY - W-VALVCI-02-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 656.04 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 57.73 23Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93071 12/21/2006 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WATER INVENTORY - WSETTER-0.75-0120061950 WATER INVENTORY - WSETTER-0.75-012 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 170.73 PAYING RETURNED ITEMS SEE CREDITS 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 235.85 W-VALVBR-02-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 462.44 W-VALVBR-01-040 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 602.00 W-VALVBR-01-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 615.00 W-BUSHNGBR-01.5-075 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 16.83 W-BUSHNGBR-01.5-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 7.29 W-BENDGA-01-030 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 15.60 W-VALVBR-02-011 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 35.78 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 192.39 24Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93071 12/21/2006 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WATER INVENTORY - W-FLNGBR-01.5-0200061950-01 WATER INVENTORY - W-FLNGBR-01.5-020 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 772.60 W-SETTER-0.75-012 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 398.37 ITEMS BEING RETURNED FOR CREDIT 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 920.66 W-ADAPTORBR-0.75-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 145.00 W-BUSHNGBR-01.5-075 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 39.27 W-BUSHNGBR-01.5-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 17.01 W-BENDGA-02-030 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 7.80 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 204.76 INVENTORY RETURNS FROM INVOICE 0061950CM056522 INVENTORY RETURNS FROM INVOICE 0061950 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -235.85 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -20.99 OVER CHARGE REFUND OF W-PIPEBR-02-011CM057117 OVER CHARGE REFUND OF W-PIPEBR-02-011 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -221.40 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -19.48 INVENTORY RETURNS - SEE INVOICECM057464 INVENTORY RETURNS - SEE INVOICE 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -920.66 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -81.94 Total :4,072.83 93072 12/21/2006 069940 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SVC 900JJM0611 INV#900JJM0611 EDMONDS PD 25Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93072 12/21/2006 (Continued)069940 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SVC CREDIT CHECK - FRAUSTO 001.000.410.521.400.410.00 13.06 Total :13.06 93073 12/21/2006 062297 FOSS MARITIME COMPANY 12182006 TIDE CHART CALENDAR TIDE CHART CALENDAR 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 10.00 Total :10.00 93074 12/21/2006 012355 GRCC B1862 B1917 2 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER 2 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 84.00 Total :84.00 93075 12/21/2006 067702 HAAKENSON, GARY 12/14/06 Mileage reimbursement:May - Dec. 2006 Mileage reimbursement:May - Dec. 2006 001.000.210.513.100.430.00 188.33 Total :188.33 93076 12/21/2006 068450 HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER H-2527240/T-55917719 H-2527240/T-55917719 - EDMONDS POLICE MEDICAL RECORDS RELEASE 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 113.85 Freight 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 3.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 10.02 Total :127.82 93077 12/21/2006 070437 HARDIE, MARY ANN 9/29/06 Tuition Reimbursement - Fall 2006 Tuition Reimbursement - Fall 2006 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 467.50 Total :467.50 93078 12/21/2006 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 2126-73 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93078 12/21/2006 (Continued)069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED Beardsley,Sarchin,Schleicher 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,520.00 Ops fit-for-duty 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 5,875.00 Total :7,395.00 93079 12/21/2006 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 26138 6035322500959949 TAPE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.92 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.97 60353225009599493094932 DIGITAL TIMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 17.97 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1.58 60353225009599494069465 GROUT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.99 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.88 60353225009599495043179 HARDWARE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 49.85 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.39 60353225009599495076888 SPRAY PAINT/BLOWER VAC 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 195.37 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.19 CREDIT/BLOWER VAC5244251 CREDIT/BLOWER VAC 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 -76.14 27Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93079 12/21/2006 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 60353225009599496095617 COPPER ELBOW 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.70 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.59 60353225009599498083653 CLAMPS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.90 60353225009599499032444 PAINT SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 144.69 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.73 Total :408.80 93080 12/21/2006 070097 INLAND TECHNOLOGY INC 62001 FAC MAINT - SAFETY PREP CASE FAC MAINT - SAFETY PREP CASE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 159.36 EP-921 CASE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 291.18 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 39.64 Total :490.18 93081 12/21/2006 068851 INT'L BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 2326 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 118.20 Total :118.20 93082 12/21/2006 065980 ISS-WONDERWARE 310283 SOFTWARE SUPPORT 28Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93082 12/21/2006 (Continued)065980 ISS-WONDERWARE SOFTWARE SUPPORT 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 6,363.93 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 560.03 Total :6,923.96 93083 12/21/2006 063370 IVANJACK, SUSAN 9-12-06 TRAVEL REFUND TRAVEL REFUND 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 41.76 Total :41.76 93084 12/21/2006 069526 KEMCO SUPPLY OF WA INC 36977 INV#36977 EDMONDS PD LG PROTECTION + LATEX GLOVES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 119.70 MED PROTECTION + LATEX GLOVES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 39.90 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 14.20 Total :173.80 93085 12/21/2006 068677 KONECRANES AMERICA INC SEA00218239 SHOP - ANNUAL INSPECTION FOR CRANE AND SHOP - ANNUAL INSPECTION FOR CRANE AND 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 770.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 68.53 Total :838.53 93086 12/21/2006 062814 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 293533 INV#293533 CUST#27559 EDMONDS PD 29Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93086 12/21/2006 (Continued)062814 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC PROLASER III RADAR GUNS 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 6,825.00 RADAR CASES 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 178.00 BATTERY MODULES 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 200.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 649.06 Total :7,852.06 93087 12/21/2006 066873 LAWLESS, JIM 12/15/05 Tuition Reimbursement - 1/9 - 4/28/06 Tuition Reimbursement - 1/9 - 4/28/06 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 660.00 Total :660.00 93088 12/21/2006 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 12006-109 SUPPLIES NOZZLE KIT, GASKET, SPREADER, LOPPERS, 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 351.06 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.88 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.39 SUPPLIES12006-134 LINETRIMMER, HEDGETRIMMER, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.350.00 1,142.97 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.350.00 101.72 Total :1,641.02 93089 12/21/2006 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 092368 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 187.46 Total :187.46 93090 12/21/2006 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 092306 INV#092306 EDMONDS PD 30Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93090 12/21/2006 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS ANIMAL CONTROL DOOR HANGERS 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 172.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 15.31 INV#092307 EDMONDS PD092307 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 2 PART FORMS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 249.00 AC WINDOW ENVELOPES 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 204.00 VEHICLE IMPOUND 2 PART FORMS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 179.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 38.09 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 18.16 Total :875.56 93091 12/21/2006 019583 MANPOWER INC 14619213 TEMP SERVICES FOR RECEPTION VACATION. TEMP SERVICES FOR RECEPTION VACATION. 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 227.22 Total :227.22 93092 12/21/2006 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 2802 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.501.490.01 180.00 INTERPRETER FEES2803 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 45.00 INTERPRETER FEES2806 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 70.00 INTERPRETER FEES2814 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 180.00 31Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93092 12/21/2006 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA INTERPRETER FEES2816 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.501.490.01 60.00 INTERPRETER FEES2817 INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.490.00 45.00 INTERPRETER FFES2823 INTERPRETER FFES 001.000.230.512.500.490.01 60.00 Total :640.00 93093 12/21/2006 071437 MAYES, ESTHER MAYES1214 REFUND REFUND - RETURNING CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 20.00 Total :20.00 93094 12/21/2006 066719 MCKENZIE & ADAMS INC 0067248 BOOTS BOOTS 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.03 Total :37.03 93095 12/21/2006 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 55459369 123106800 BATTERIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 166.43 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 7.72 12310680055549091 LATCH 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 59.33 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.32 Total :238.80 32Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93096 12/21/2006 069285 MERCER MD, JAMES 1012-06 ALS PRO SERVICES Dec Med Prgm Dir 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,644.75 Total :1,644.75 93097 12/21/2006 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 13546 MICROFICHE - LAND USE FILES FOR 2001 MICROFICHE - LAND USE FILES FOR 2001 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 489.16 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 43.04 MICROFILMING SERVICES - BLDG. DEPT.13547 MICROFILMING SERVICES - BLDG. DEPT. 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 352.90 Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 31.05 Total :916.15 93098 12/21/2006 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0311422-IN UNIT 24 & 11 - BATTERY UNIT 24 & 11 - BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 477.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 41.06 FLEET SHOP INVENTORY - FILTERS0311656-IN FLEET SHOP INVENTORY - FILTERS 511.000.000.141.170.000.00 48.91 Sales Tax 511.000.000.141.170.000.00 4.21 Total :571.58 93099 12/21/2006 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1173832.001 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 231.85 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 19.94 Total :251.79 33Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93100 12/21/2006 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0074661 SODIUM BISULFITE SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 990.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 88.11 SODIUM BISULFITE0074688 SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 1,372.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 122.15 Total :2,572.76 93101 12/21/2006 070045 NORTHUP GROUP 1278 INV#1278 - EDMONDS PD PRE-EMPLOYMENT EVAL~ 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 300.00 Total :300.00 93102 12/21/2006 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0380947 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0380948 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0382494 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 716.33 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0382500 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 166.81 HONEY BUCKET CREDIT0383421 CREDIT FOR HONEY BUCKET @ MADRONA 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 -60.90 Total :1,012.96 93103 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 873595 Office Supplies - L. Carl 34Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93103 12/21/2006 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Office Supplies - L. Carl 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 55.31 King County Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 4.87 Office Supplies - HR945394 Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 15.80 Service charge 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 1.39 Office Supplies - L. Carl985647 Office Supplies - L. Carl 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 179.15 King County Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 15.76 Total :273.28 93104 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 936619 OFFICE SUPPLIES MARKERS, INK CARTRIDGES, PLANNERS, 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 69.47 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.12 Total :75.59 93105 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 015625 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 95.10 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 8.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES902598 Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 118.01 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 10.38 35Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :231.869310512/21/2006 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 93106 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 988112 PW ADMIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES, PENCILS, PW ADMIN - OFFICE SUPPLIES, PENCILS, 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 65.30 STREET/STORM - CALENDARS 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 22.76 STREET/STORM - CALENDARS 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 22.75 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 5.75 King County Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 2.00 King County Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 2.00 Total :120.56 93107 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 020741 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - DEV. SVCS. MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - DEV. SVCS. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 230.71 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 20.30 Total :251.01 93108 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 947193 Office supplies for Council Office Office supplies for Council Office 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 194.94 Total :194.94 93109 12/21/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 976016 ADMIN SUPPLIES office supplies 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 143.23 King County Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 12.60 Total :155.83 93110 12/21/2006 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 954447 Copier Maint. for PW~ 36Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93110 12/21/2006 (Continued)066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION Copier Maint. for PW~ 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 111.86 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 9.96 Total :121.82 93111 12/21/2006 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 40773 STORM DEPT - DUMP FEES STORM DEPT - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 140.38 Total :140.38 93112 12/21/2006 070931 PATTON BOGGS LLP 024108 Nov 06 DC LOBBYIST NOV 06 Lobbyist for November 2006 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,000.00 Total :4,000.00 93113 12/21/2006 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 26009-00008 E5AB.SR99 Study thru 11/26/06 E5AB.SR99 Study thru 11/26/06 001.000.620.532.200.410.00 6,769.50 Total :6,769.50 93114 12/21/2006 007800 PETTY CASH tcpetty parking-waters 11/19 37Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93114 12/21/2006 (Continued)007800 PETTY CASH parking-waters 11/19 001.000.310.518.880.430.00 7.00 tape measure 001.000.620.558.600.310.00 21.72 mileage rem-zuluaf 001.000.620.524.100.430.00 18.26 coffee, sugar 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 34.57 nov 9th cities and towns meeting 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 30.00 coffee 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 12.95 mileage reimb-M. Smith 001.000.510.522.300.430.00 21.43 supplies and decorations for holiday 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 129.86 batteries 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 15.19 sno cnty clerks meeting 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00 coffee 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 12.95 parking-westfall 001.000.510.522.300.430.00 5.00 sccfoa lunch meeting 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00 coffee 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 29.98 parking fee 001.000.310.518.880.430.00 22.00 parking-westfall 001.000.510.522.300.430.00 5.00 mileage-waters 001.000.310.518.880.430.00 8.37 38Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :394.289311412/21/2006 007800 007800 PETTY CASH 93115 12/21/2006 028400 PITNEY BOWES 755638 DM1000 MAILING SYSTEM DUST COVER DM1000 Mailing System Dust Cover250-00129 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 44.62 Total :44.62 93116 12/21/2006 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100-DC06 DM1000 MAILING SYSTEM LEASE DM1000 Mailing System Lease~250-00128 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 792.00 Total :792.00 93117 12/21/2006 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0438207 FAC MAINT - 4TUBE BALLASTS FAC MAINT - 4TUBE BALLASTS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 219.60 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.54 CM from 2003 Fac Maint2783991 CM from 2003 Fac Maint 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -102.49 Total :136.65 93118 12/21/2006 071039 PRO-KLEEN 001 TANK CLEANING TANK CLEANING 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 1,832.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 163.05 Total :1,995.05 93119 12/21/2006 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2422756 alarm monitoring for Library alarm monitoring for Library 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 174.00 39Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93119 12/21/2006 (Continued)064088 PROTECTION ONE PW ALARM MONITORING730531 24 hour alarm monitoring PW 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 21.00 24 hour alarm monitoring PW 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 21.00 24 hour alarm monitoring PW 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 18.38 24 hour alarm monitoring PW 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 23.63 24 hour alarm monitoring PW 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 10.50 24 hour alarm monitoring PW 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 10.49 Total :279.00 93120 12/21/2006 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 06-818 COURT SECURITY OFFICER COURT SECURITY OFFICER 001.000.230.512.500.410.00 1,432.49 Total :1,432.49 93121 12/21/2006 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 68380 MONUMENT/INSCRIPTION MONUMENT/INSCRIPTION:~ 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 175.00 MARKER72128 MARKER: CHAMBERS 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 285.00 INSCRIPTION72323 INSCRIPTION: DUELL 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00 INSCRIPTION72324 INSCRIPTION: ROBERTSON 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 81.00 INSCRIPTION72567 INSCRIPTION: DASTIS 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00 40Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93121 12/21/2006 (Continued)030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC INSCRIPTION72756 INSCRIPTION: SIMONSON 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 77.00 INSCRIPTION72757 INSCRIPTION: MOSES 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 77.00 Total :845.00 93122 12/21/2006 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 45748 INV#45748 EDMONDS PD CASE 06-5794 TOYOTA TUNDRA A89790M 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 124.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 11.04 Total :135.04 93123 12/21/2006 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0612045 Sheehan Retaining Wall Review Sheehan Retaining Wall Review 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,335.00 Total :1,335.00 93124 12/21/2006 031600 RELIABLE FLOOR COVERINGS 107634 CITY HALL - ROPPE STAIR TREADS CITY HALL - ROPPE STAIR TREADS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 218.26 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.43 Total :237.69 93125 12/21/2006 068483 RH2 ENGINEERING INC 44048 E3JC.Water Supply System thru 11/26/06 E3JC.Water Supply System thru 11/26/06 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 367.00 Total :367.00 93126 12/21/2006 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9411598366 WATER DEPT - ASPHALT 41Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93126 12/21/2006 (Continued)068484 RINKER MATERIALS WATER DEPT - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 83.21 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.32 STREET DEPT - SAND9411608104 STREET DEPT - SAND 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 622.35 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 48.44 STORM DEPT - SAND9411629076 STORM DEPT - SAND 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 601.07 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 39.28 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT COLD MIX9411629077 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT COLD MIX 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 134.36 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT COLD MIX 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 134.35 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.83 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.82 Total :1,694.03 93127 12/21/2006 069477 ROTARY OFFSET PRESS INC 8869 2007 WINTER CRAZE THE CRAZE - WINTER 2007 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 7,190.72 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 632.78 BULK MAIL PREP8872 WINTER 2007~ 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 93.33 Total :7,916.83 42Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93128 12/21/2006 069879 SALTER JOYCE ZIKER PLLC 10564 LEGAL FEES - 8TH & WALNUT PETROLEUM LEGAL FEES - 8TH & WALNUT PETROLEUM 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 95.00 Total :95.00 93129 12/21/2006 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 111812 OPS PROTCTV CLOTHNG Helmet 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 125.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 6.94 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 11.61 OPS PROTECTV CLOTHNG111869 Campbell 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 140.74 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 5.78 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 12.89 Total :302.96 93130 12/21/2006 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 06-60 SHOP - HYPRO PUMP SHOP - HYPRO PUMP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 386.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.11 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 36.79 Total :454.90 93131 12/21/2006 071423 SEATTLE U / SIA SEMINARS DAWSON SUCCESSFUL GRANT FUNDING/D.DAWSON D.DAWSON/REGISTRATION~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 100.00 Total :100.00 93132 12/21/2006 062299 SERPENTIX CONVEYOR CORP 11996 BELT/HINGES/BELT PAN WASHER/NUT 43Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93132 12/21/2006 (Continued)062299 SERPENTIX CONVEYOR CORP BELT/HINGES/BELT PAN WASHER/NUT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 474.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.89 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 43.78 Total :535.67 93133 12/21/2006 071248 SLEEP INN - SEATAC 15573 INV#15573 - SUTTON SUTTON/LODGING~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 280.95 Total :280.95 93134 12/21/2006 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 5320018384 SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.26 Total :29.26 93135 12/21/2006 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2470018124 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 49.59 fire station # 162540794324 fire station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,817.05 LIFT STATION #92790012476 LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 197.86 SIGNAL LIGHT2880012519 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 38.99 LIBRARY3720012057 LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,744.02 44Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93135 12/21/2006 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 BLINKING LIGHT3970013599 BLINKING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.23 LIFT STATION #134010023721 LIFT STATION #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 243.93 SIGNAL LIGHT4320010194 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 35.80 Public Works4840011953 Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 106.97 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 406.49 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 406.49 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 406.49 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 406.49 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 406.50 SIGNAL LIGHT5380011832 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.23 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX5390028164 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 5,958.93 CITY HALL5410010689 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,086.94 TRAFFIC LIGHT5450016042 TRAFFIC LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 226.81 45Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93135 12/21/2006 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS5470012336 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.23 TRAFFIC LIGHT5510015661 TRAFFIC LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74 Total :16,659.78 93136 12/21/2006 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 47507 DUMP FEES PARK MAINTENANCE DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 373.05 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 12.95 WASTE DISPOSAL47694 DUMP CHARGES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 243.23 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 8.77 Total :638.00 93137 12/21/2006 070684 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 119858 SUPPORT SERVICES SUPPORT SERVICES 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 983.68 53769119860 C-161 SCREENING PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,386.00 Total :2,369.68 93138 12/21/2006 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2493213 SEWER DEPT - WD40 SEWER DEPT - WD40 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 19.44 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.67 Total :21.11 46Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93139 12/21/2006 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 826359 PW - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PW - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 65.40 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.82 FISHING PIER - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES826360 FISHING PIER - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.27 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.07 Total :96.56 93140 12/21/2006 061912 SUN SUPPLY 5095630-IN STREET DEPT - DARK BLUE COREX STREET DEPT - DARK BLUE COREX 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 100.30 Total :100.30 93141 12/21/2006 067835 T-MOBILE 135840772 CELL PHONES PARK MAINTENANCE CELL PHONES 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 85.36 Total :85.36 93142 12/21/2006 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10470943 SHOP SUPPLIES - SCREWS SHOP SUPPLIES - SCREWS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 78.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.99 SHOP SUPPLIES - DRILL BITS10470944 SHOP SUPPLIES - DRILL BITS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 77.85 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.93 Total :170.27 93143 12/21/2006 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 37711 WATER/SEWER - FLEXFIT BRUSHED HATS 47Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93143 12/21/2006 (Continued)040916 TC SPAN AMERICA WATER/SEWER - FLEXFIT BRUSHED HATS 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 192.00 WATER/SEWER - FLEXFIT BRUSHED HATS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 192.00 ACRYLIC KNIT BEANIES 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 100.00 ACRYLIC KNIT BEANIES 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 100.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 25.99 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 25.99 WATER/SEWER -~37713 WATER/SEWER -~ 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 24.00 WATER/SEWER -~ 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 24.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 2.14 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 2.14 Total :688.26 93144 12/21/2006 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1458666 E6DB.RFQ Caspers Walkway E6DB.RFQ Caspers Walkway 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 82.80 Total :82.80 93145 12/21/2006 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 526287 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.00 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING726508 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.00 48Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :20.009314512/21/2006 038315 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 93146 12/21/2006 065934 TUNE TALES TUNETALES7378 MUSIC CLASSES PAYMENT #2:~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,462.10 Total :2,462.10 93147 12/21/2006 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA0158168-WA STORM - DOT STORM - DOT 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 174.00 Total :174.00 93148 12/21/2006 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE 12/18/06 City newsletter mailing - December 2006 City newsletter mailing - December 2006 001.000.240.513.110.410.00 2,675.00 Total :2,675.00 93149 12/21/2006 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 279372 WATER DEPT - NORWELL ECO BAILER WATER DEPT - NORWELL ECO BAILER 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 90.30 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.97 Total :99.27 93150 12/21/2006 064198 UZ ENGINEERED PRODUCTS 93253192 76870 CUT-EASE LUBRICANT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 524.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 16.94 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 48.17 Total :589.51 93151 12/21/2006 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST Job Shack November E5MC.Job Shack Phone 11/16-12/15 E5MC.Job Shack Phone 11/16-12/15 112.506.630.595.330.650.00 71.17 49Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :71.179315112/21/2006 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 93152 12/21/2006 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-NW2-0887 Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00 Total :280.00 93153 12/21/2006 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425NW1-0060 03 0210 1079569413 10 BPS TELEMETARY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.02 Total :41.02 93154 12/21/2006 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2087490623 CORREIRA 425-315-6304 Correira removed from Mayor's acct 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 -45.99 G. Haakenson cell ph. (12/7 - 1/6/07) &2095540682 G. Haakenson cell ph. (12/7 - 1/6/07) & 001.000.210.513.100.420.00 151.42 Total :105.43 93155 12/21/2006 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 206-706-3334 C/A 370106564-00002 Cell Phone Jim Stevens 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 42.61 206-999-9374464229910-1 sewer lead cell phone 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 119.56 CELL PHONE-STREET LEAD570091643-00001 CELL PHONE-STREET LEAD 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 36.99 206-947-3220964212899-00001 cell phone water quality 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 85.82 Total :284.98 93156 12/21/2006 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2095814885 OPS COMMUNICATIONS Air card 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 106.73 50Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 51 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :106.739315612/21/2006 067865 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 93157 12/21/2006 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 28714493 1066294 PH SOLUTION/PETRI DISH/PIPETS/TIP 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 401.68 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 35.75 Total :437.43 93158 12/21/2006 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH WATER WRKS OPER CERT WATER WORKS OPERATOR CERTIFICATON WATER WORKS OPERATOR CERTIFICATON 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 21.00 WATER WORKS OPERATOR CERTIFICATON 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 21.00 WATER WORKS OPERATOR CERTIFICATON 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 336.00 WATER WORKS OPERATOR CERTIFICATONWATER WRKS OPER CERT WATER WORKS OPERATOR CERTIFICATON 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 252.00 Total :630.00 93159 12/21/2006 045515 WABO 11077 2006 INT. BUILDING CODES - BLDG DEPT. 2006 INT. BUILDING CODES - BLDG DEPT. 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 143.09 Total :143.09 93160 12/21/2006 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I106012700 INV#I06012700 - EDMONDS PD BACKGROUNDS~ 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 192.00 Total :192.00 93161 12/21/2006 068106 WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS 5284 INV#5284 EDMONDS PD 51Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 52 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93161 12/21/2006 (Continued)068106 WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS STREAMLIGHT BATTERY STICKS 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 71.80 STREAMLIGHT BULBS 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 69.75 NI-CAD STREAMLIGHT BATTERIES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 35.90 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 5.84 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.31 Total :199.60 93162 12/21/2006 061168 WESTFALL, JOHN 11/28/06 Tuition Reimbursement - 6/26 - 8/4/06 Tuition Reimbursement - 6/26 - 8/4/06 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 105.00 Total :105.00 93163 12/21/2006 061047 WWCPA WWCPA ANNUAL RENEWAL WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - WAITE WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - WAITE 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 5.00 WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - WAITE 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 5.00 WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - HIGHLAND,WWCPA ANNUAL RENEWAL WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - HIGHLAND, 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 30.00 WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - HARRIS, MATTHEWS,WWCPA ANNUAL RENEWAL WWCPA 2007 RENEWAL - HARRIS, MATTHEWS, 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 50.00 Total :90.00 93164 12/21/2006 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 211 DEC-06 RETAINER Dec-06 Retainer 001.000.360.515.230.410.00 6,000.00 Total :6,000.00 52Page: 12/21/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 53 3:12:03PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount Bank total :728,556.89160 Vouchers for bank code :front 728,556.89Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report160 53Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93166 12/28/2006 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 1206173 VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 266.04 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 23.68 BASKETBALL SHIRTS1206174 3 ON 3 AND 5 ON 5 BASKETBALL SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 168.75 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 15.02 Total :473.49 93167 12/28/2006 069751 ARAMARK 512-3780962 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.410.00 36.66 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.410.00 3.26 Total :39.92 93168 12/28/2006 064343 AT&T 730386050200 425-744-6057 PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Fax Line 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 2.26 Public Works Fax Line 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 8.58 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 8.58 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 8.58 Public Works Fax Line 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 8.58 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 8.60 Total :45.18 93169 12/28/2006 002343 BILL HATCH SPORTING GOODS 19088 UNIFORMS 1Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93169 12/28/2006 (Continued)002343 BILL HATCH SPORTING GOODS Caps 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 225.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 19.80 Total :244.80 93170 12/28/2006 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY101825 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 25.85 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.30 Total :28.15 93171 12/28/2006 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460519333 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 44.72 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 3.98 UNIFORMS460519334 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 93.92 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.35 UNIFORMS460520406 ALS - Stn. 17 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.47 Ops - Stn. 17 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.47 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.59 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.58 2Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93171 12/28/2006 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORMS460520435 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 118.51 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.54 UNIFORMS460524617 Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 44.72 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 3.98 UNIFORMS460524618 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 93.92 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.35 Total :641.10 93172 12/28/2006 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 6-6550 JOINT MAINTENANCE/MEADOWDALE PLAYFIELDS JULY - NOVEMEBER 2006~ 001.000.640.576.800.510.00 19,297.18 Total :19,297.18 93173 12/28/2006 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 4838 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83 Total :13,800.83 93174 12/28/2006 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 06-2701 MINUTE TAKING Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 126.00 MINUTE TAKING06-2800 Verbatim Transcript 12/7/06 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 154.00 Total :280.00 3Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93175 12/28/2006 071438 ECMS INC 201256 TRAINING MISC Turner class 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 585.00 Total :585.00 93176 12/28/2006 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 11291 NEWSLETTER INSERTS SISTER CITY INSERTS IN CHAMBER OF 623.200.210.557.210.490.00 40.00 Total :40.00 93177 12/28/2006 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E196192 Pre-employment screening Pre-employment screening 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 72.00 Total :72.00 93178 12/28/2006 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00025 CITY MARINA BEACH PARK CITY MARINA BEACH PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 39.34 CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM6-00200 CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 97.43 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 77.82 MINI PARK6-00475 MINI PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 169.75 CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 60.79 600 3RD AVE S6-01275 600 3RD AVE S 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 282.28 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 65.14 4Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93178 12/28/2006 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)6-02900 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER) 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 59.07 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 109.25 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 37.63 CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575 CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 68.36 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 57.36 WATER6-04425 8100 185TH PL SW 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 123.60 SIERRA PARK6-04450 SIERRA PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 83.27 BALLINGER PARK6-07775 BALLINGER PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 73.31 YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500 YOST PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 273.10 YOST PARK POOL6-08525 YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 60.41 Total :1,737.91 93179 12/28/2006 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 4-34080 LIFT STATION #14 LIFT STATION #14 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.70 5Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93179 12/28/2006 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 474.43 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE6-02736 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 6.53 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE6-02737 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 70.75 PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 57.36 LIBRARY & SPRINKLER6-02825 LIBRARY & SPRINKLER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 422.59 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR)6-02875 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR) 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 11.42 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER6-02925 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 509.68 Fire Station #166-04127 Fire Station #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 203.90 fire sprinkler-FS #166-04128 fire sprinkler-FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 6.53 6Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93179 12/28/2006 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Public Works Bldg6-05155 Public Works Bldg 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 61.76 Public Works Bldg 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 234.70 Public Works Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 234.70 Public Works Bldg 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 234.70 Public Works Bldg 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 234.70 Public Works Bldg 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 234.69 Public Works Fire Detector6-05156 Public Works Fire Detector 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 0.82 Public Works Fire Detector 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 3.10 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 3.10 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 3.10 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 3.10 Public Works Fire Detector 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 3.08 Total :3,036.44 93180 12/28/2006 071416 EFFECTIVE OPTIONS 62006 MGMNT CONSULTING - 2ND INSTALLMENT MGMNT CONSULTING - 2ND INSTALLMENT 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 500.00 MGMNT CONSULTING - 2ND INSTALLMENT 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 500.00 MGMNT CONSULTING - 2ND INSTALLMENT 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 500.00 7Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,500.009318012/28/2006 071416 071416 EFFECTIVE OPTIONS 93181 12/28/2006 009835 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INTL 9442 LEASE FOR CROWN VIC UNIT 233 LEASE FOR 2004 CROWN VIC 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 711.75 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 65.49 MONTHLY LEASE; 6 CROWN VICS9443 UNIT 235,236,237,238,239 Monthly Lease 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 3,358.33 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 308.96 Total :4,444.53 93182 12/28/2006 011917 GERMANIA SEED CO 173578 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 51.25 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 7.42 Total :58.67 93183 12/28/2006 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1033458 FAC - SEALANT FAC - SEALANT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.92 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.75 CITY PARKS BLDG - PLYWOOD1033474 CITY PARKS BLDG - PLYWOOD 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.87 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.66 FAC MAINT- PAINT SUPPLIES AND SINK1043542 FAC MAINT- PAINT SUPPLIES AND SINK 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 83.92 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.38 8Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93183 12/28/2006 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES UNIT 647 - CORD SUPPLIES1586330 UNIT 647 - CORD SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.44 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.06 STREET DEPT - SIMPLE GREEN3038106 STREET DEPT - SIMPLE GREEN 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 17.86 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.57 FAC MAINT - STOCK SUPPLIES3060412 FAC MAINT - STOCK SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 63.91 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.62 FS 16 - SUPPLIES34587 FS 16 - SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.25 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.64 MCH - WAX RING, DRILL BITS, DOOR4043282 MCH - WAX RING, DRILL BITS, DOOR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 148.49 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.07 STREET DEPT - PAINT ROLLERS4067067 STREET DEPT - PAINT ROLLERS 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 7.45 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 0.66 MUSEUM - AL PL CLR SUPPLIES4100511 MUSEUM - AL PL CLR SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.52 9Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93183 12/28/2006 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES MCH - ELF BOWL, AND WAX RING RETURNED4244342 MCH - ELF BOWL, AND WAX RING RETURNED 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -115.96 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -10.21 FS 16 - PVC'S, ADAPTORS, BUSHINGS,44977 FS 16 - PVC'S, ADAPTORS, BUSHINGS, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.31 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.81 LIFT ST 14 - GATE LATCH5034113 LIFT ST 14 - GATE LATCH 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.57 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.49 STREET DEPT - SPRAY PAINT5040613 STREET DEPT - SPRAY PAINT 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.97 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 0.53 MEDOWDALE CH - TOILET TANK, BOWL, SEAT,5043192 MEDOWDALE CH - TOILET TANK, BOWL, SEAT, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 207.26 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.24 FS 16 - CLAMPS, VINYL, CLAMP SUPPLIES6045389 FS 16 - CLAMPS, VINYL, CLAMP SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.39 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.27 CITY HALL - WIRE NUTS6076772 CITY HALL - WIRE NUTS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.84 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.95 10Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93183 12/28/2006 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SEWER DEPT - ROPE CLEAT, PUSH BROOM,6076789 SEWER DEPT - ROPE CLEAT, PUSH BROOM, 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 53.85 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.74 FAC - PLUG, CONNECTOR, SHEARS, DRYWALL6571826 FAC - PLUG, CONNECTOR, SHEARS, DRYWALL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.73 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.06 CEMETARY - ROLLERS, PAINT BRUSHES7042894 CEMETARY - ROLLERS, PAINT BRUSHES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 44.44 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.91 FS 16 - PVC, BUSHINGS, TEES, SUPPLIES7045242 FS 16 - PVC, BUSHINGS, TEES, SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.38 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.76 CEMETARY - BRUSH ASSORMENT7093711 CEMETARY - BRUSH ASSORMENT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.92 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.70 FAC - CHISELS, WEDGE ANCHORE8031290 FAC - CHISELS, WEDGE ANCHORE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 68.98 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.07 CITY HALL - WINDEX WIPES, BATTERIES,8082744 CITY HALL - WINDEX WIPES, BATTERIES, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 41.06 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.61 11Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93183 12/28/2006 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES SEWER DEPT - PEGBOARD HOOKS8116344 SEWER DEPT - PEGBOARD HOOKS 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.37 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.47 FAC - ROLLER TRAY, TOGGLE BOLT, BUCKET83481 FAC - ROLLER TRAY, TOGGLE BOLT, BUCKET 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.10 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.80 STORM DEPT - SPRAY PAINT, PAINT, HOSE,9038520 STORM DEPT - SPRAY PAINT, PAINT, HOSE, 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 107.63 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 9.47 STORM DEPT - GARDEN HOSE FITTINGS9038521 STORM DEPT - GARDEN HOSE FITTINGS 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 20.58 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 1.81 FLEET SHOP - CASTER KITS9080541 FLEET SHOP - CASTER KITS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.84 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.92 STORM DEPT - HOSE RETURNED9256748 STORM DEPT - HOSE RETURNED 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 -19.97 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 -1.76 STORM - HOSE9256749 STORM - HOSE 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 19.97 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 1.76 12Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,104.649318312/28/2006 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 93184 12/28/2006 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17239 E6FB.2006 CITYWIDE STORMDRAINAGE E6FB.2006 CITYWIDE STORMDRAINAGE 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 2,145.95 Total :2,145.95 93185 12/28/2006 062549 KSER FOUNDATION KSER2006 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT 123.000.640.573.100.410.00 750.00 Total :750.00 93186 12/28/2006 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 547305 SUPPLIES SEMIAUTO HEAD 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 25.25 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.25 Total :27.50 93187 12/28/2006 071140 MAD SCIENCE MADSCIENCE7338 MAD SCIENCE CAMP MAD SCIENCE CAMP #7338 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 770.67 Total :770.67 93188 12/28/2006 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 37294 SUPPLIES CHAIN SAW CHAINS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 800.00 Total :800.00 93189 12/28/2006 022009 MOTOROLA INC 13555583 OPS COMMUNICATIONS Advisor II pagers 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 1,190.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 105.91 Total :1,295.91 93190 12/28/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 064321 Office Supplies - C. Cruz 13Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93190 12/28/2006 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Office Supplies - C. Cruz 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 162.89 King County Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 14.33 Total :177.22 93191 12/28/2006 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 803894 OFFICE SUPPLIES MARKERS, BINDINGS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 24.77 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES980266 INK CARTRIDGE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 107.12 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.43 Total :143.42 93192 12/28/2006 026015 OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE OBT2006 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT 123.000.640.573.100.410.00 1,900.00 Total :1,900.00 93193 12/28/2006 063750 ORCA PACIFIC 026305 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL PUMP 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 425.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.83 Total :462.83 93194 12/28/2006 063588 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS CO 693390-00 SUPPLIES 14Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93194 12/28/2006 (Continued)063588 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS CO SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 36.00 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.95 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.57 Total :45.52 93195 12/28/2006 064088 PROTECTION ONE 1988948 FAC alarm monitoring for FAC 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 180.00 Total :180.00 93196 12/28/2006 066114 SAFETYLINE 5767 GARMENTS FLIGHT JACKET, PARKA 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 179.78 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.84 Total :184.62 93197 12/28/2006 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 111971 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING Campbell 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 505.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 8.86 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 45.22 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING111972 McAllister 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 505.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 44.44 15Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93197 12/28/2006 (Continued)061482 SEA-WESTERN INC PROTECTIVE CLOTHING111973 Ness 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 838.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 73.74 Total :2,020.26 93198 12/28/2006 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060028723 YOST PARK POOL YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 432.95 MAPLEWOOD HILL PARK2710014701 MAPLEWOOD HILL PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.21 Total :464.16 93199 12/28/2006 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060014392 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.23 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3380016422 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.69 FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK3460019262 FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 267.45 Fire station #167060000275 Fire station #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 31.39 Total :360.76 93200 12/28/2006 064137 SQUIRE, LARRY SQUIRE7247l GUITAR CLASSES LATE REGISTRATION FOR #7247 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 27.00 Total :27.00 93201 12/28/2006 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO Standard 01/2007 STANDARD INSURANCE PREMIUMS JANUARY 07 16Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93201 12/28/2006 (Continued)060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO Standard Insurance Premiums for January 811.000.000.231.550.000.00 18,590.96 Total :18,590.96 93202 12/28/2006 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 37836 UNIFORMS knit caps 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 650.00 Total :650.00 93203 12/28/2006 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 50.66 YOST POOL425-775-2645 YOST POOL 001.000.640.575.510.420.00 61.12 Total :111.78 93204 12/28/2006 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM LIBRARY SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.84 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE425-672-7132 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 51.35 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS425-775-1534 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 159.51 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 296.23 Radio Line between Public Works & UB425-775-7865 Radio Line between Public Works & UB 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 50.03 17Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 93204 12/28/2006 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST Public Works Connection to 911425-RT0-9133 Public Works Connection to 911 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48 Public Works Connection to 911 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78 Total :681.46 93205 12/28/2006 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 769986915-01 425-231-2668 cell phone-water lead 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 39.22 Total :39.22 93206 12/28/2006 068106 WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS 5291 OPS COMMUNICATIONS Antennas 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 102.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 6.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 9.68 Total :118.43 Bank total :79,377.5141 Vouchers for bank code :front 79,377.51Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report41 18Page: 12/27/2006 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 4:03:17PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 19Page: AM-793 2.D. Interlocal Agreement for the Recycling Coordinator Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Linda Klein, Public Works Submitted For:Steve Fisher Time:Consent Department:Public Works Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Authorization for the Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Lynnwood and the City of Edmonds for joint funding of the Recycling Coordinator. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement between Lynnwood and Edmonds to jointly fund the Recycling Coordinator position and implement their respective 2007 and 2008 Waste Prevention and Recycling Programs. Previous Council Action None. Narrative Since 1995, City Council and staff have agreed to pursue a cooperative agreement with the City of Lynnwood to share resources, which would ensure continuation of their respective waste prevention and recycling programs. The original draft interlocal agreement was produced and approved on March 28, 1995. A provision of the agreement allowed extension of the agreement upon mutual consent of both cities. An updated interlocal agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, with this agreement covering the upcoming two-year period of 2007 and 2008, in order to coincide with both city’s biennial budget cycles. Lynnwood will provide 35 percent funding of the City of Edmonds Recycling Coordinator position. The cost for the Recycling Coordinator position is funded as follows: 2-Year Amount Funding Source $ 50,760 Department of Ecology Grant (including City match) $ 58,000 City of Lynnwood $ 56,820 Edmonds Utility Fund $165,580 Total Besides providing education on recycling and other solid waste issues, this position provides public education outreach for the protection of City streams and water courses as required under the Federal Clean Water Act and water conservation information. The Lynnwood City Council has sought authorization from the Mayor of Lynnwood to sign this agreement at an upcoming Council Meeting. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Interlocal Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/10/2007 03:48 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/10/2007 03:50 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 09:36 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Klein Started On: 01/08/2007 09:25 AM Final Approval Date: 01/11/2007 AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 BETWEEN THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR JOINT FUNDING OF A RECYCLING COORDINATOR THIS AGREEMENT between the City of Lynnwood (“Lynnwood”) and the City of Edmonds (“Edmonds”), each a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of Washington, is dated this______ day of ____________ 2007. WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34, RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local government units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on the basis of mutual advantage; and WHEREAS, Edmonds and Lynnwood each presently staff and operate a solid waste program partially funded by a Department of Ecology Grant; and WHEREAS, the Department of Ecology has funds available to partially fund a continuation of the program; and 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 WHEREAS both Edmonds and Lynnwood have partially funded their respective programs for 2007 and 2008, yet do not have full funding capability; and WHEREAS, Edmonds and Lynnwood have concluded that it would be in their best interests for Edmonds and Lynnwood to jointly fund their solid waste efforts as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Edmonds shall employ a Recycling Coordinator, with appropriate qualifications. The selection of the Recycling Coordinator shall be subject to the approval of Lynnwood, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2. The Recycling Coordinator shall provide Edmonds and Lynnwood with a recycling program during 2007 and 2008 as provided in exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 3. The Edmonds Recycling Coordinator will document actual activities and contacts in meeting the Lynnwood recycling program, and will provide verification of time spent on Lynnwood activities. 4. For services provided by the Recycling Coordinator, Lynnwood will reimburse Edmonds an amount not to exceed $29,000.00 in the year 2007 and $29,000.00 in 2008. Reimbursement shall be paid quarterly at a rate of $41.14 per hour in the year 2007 and $43.28 in the year 2008, plus Lynnwood’s fair share of direct charges of labor, benefits, and material costs, without the inclusion of overhead or general administrative charges, incurred in administering the Lynnwood recycling program. 330936.01|360099|0009|73c_01!.DOC (1/12/07) -1- Edmonds shall notify Lynnwood when Edmonds has been reimbursed $20,000.00 in either year at which time the parties shall meet to determine whether to amend the agreement to provide for further work and compensation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 5. The term of this agreement shall expire December 31, 2008. This agreement may be extended by mutual agreement of both parties and upon specific approval of the respective recycling programs for future budget years. 6. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon sixty (60) days notice. Reconciliation of costs, payment, transfer of developed materials, and a current report of completed activities will be completed within the sixty (60) day period following notice by either party. 7. Lynnwood agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds from any claims arising as a result of the administration of Lynnwood’s program under this agreement, and Lynnwood and Edmonds agree to bear respective liability for any acts or omissions resulting from this agreement as the same shall be determined under the laws of the State of Washington or a mutually approved settlement agreement. 8. This agreement incorporates all the understanding between Edmonds and Lynnwood and may only be modified in a writing signed by the parties hereto. It shall be filed with the Department of Ecology and the Snohomish County Auditor as required by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of this _____ day of ________________, 2007. CITY OF LYNNWOOD CITY OF EDMONDS ___________________________ ___________________________ Don Gough, Mayor Gary Haakenson, Mayor ATTEST ATTEST ___________________________ ___________________________ Vicki Heilman, Assistant Finance Director Sandra Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM ___________________________ ___________________________ Michael P. Ruark, City Attorney W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney 330936.01|360099|0009|73c_01!.DOC (1/12/07) -2- EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Waste Reduction and Recycling Programs Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood CONTINUED PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL MESSAGES & OUTREACH: Messages on public access cable channels. Newsletter articles. Program information section for city Internet web sites. Presentations and assistance to schools and businesses. Outreach at local events. Maintain Recycle Cart (Edmonds) and Recycle/Compost information racks (Lynnwood). Distribution of brochures and flyers, and creation of educational displays. Publicity, coordination and assistance with local scout troops with Christmas tree recycling. ASSISTANCE to MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES with RECYCLING EFFORTS: Continues to supply information and assistance to managers and tenants. Expansion of available recycling to non-participating properties. Contamination issues, illegal dumping, Christmas tree collection, multi-lingual information. EXPANSION & MAINTENANCE of SINGLE-FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAMS: Cooperation with the municipal waste collection companies in identifying non-customers for use in a campaign to increase single family participation. Publicity, information and management for special recycling collection and clean-up events (Lynnwood). ASSISTANCE to the COMMERCIAL SECTOR with WASTE PREVENTION & RECYCLING EFFORTS and SOLID WASTE ISSUES & MANAGEMENT: Contacts, site visits, waste assessments to retail/office/manufacturers/schools/institutions. Presentations of options and opportunities for businesses such as construction and demolition debris recycling, material exchanges and reuse opportunities, and issues affecting water quality. Continuation of promotion and maintenance of the Pilot Compost Collection Project – involving collecting organics from restaurants and other food service businesses. Small Quantity Generator educational outreach (special & hazardous wastes). CONTINUED CITY IN-HOUSE WASTE PREVENTION & RECYCLING PROGRAM: Keep employees updated on recycling information and opportunities. Expand and evaluate recycling, reuse, and solid waste generation and disposal. Coordinate proper recycling of unwanted electronics. ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES: Grant administration: Quarterly and final reports for Department of Ecology. Program evaluation and ordinance research and writing. Planning stages for proposed new and remodeled commercial and multi-family properties to help site enclosures and containers for garbage and recycling. Continued liaison with the municipal solid waste collection companies. CONTINUED LIAISON with COUNTY SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT: Meetings and assistance with County programs: -Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off Station. -County solid waste and recycling facilities. -Used oil, oil filters, and antifreeze collection sites. -“Take It Back” Network for proper electronics recycling. Representative on Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) (Edmonds) 330936.01|360099|0009|73c_01!.DOC (1/12/07) -3- AM-786 2.E. SeaShore Forum Agreement Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Dave Gebert, Engineering Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign Agreement for the SeaShore Transportation Forum. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement for the SeaShore Transportation Forum. Previous Council Action On February 25, 2003, Council authorized the Mayor to sign an Agreement for the SeaShore Transportation Forum and approved expenditures of $500 per year for payment of membership in the Forum from the City Council operating budget beginning in 2004. Narrative The SeaShore Transportation Forum was established in 1995 for the purpose of information sharing, advocacy, consensus building, and coordination to resolve transportation issues in north King County and south Snohomish County . Participants include King County , Snohomish County , municipalities in north King County and south Snohomish County , Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), Sound Transit, Community Transit (CT), Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and the Port of Seattle. Edmonds has been participating as a member of the SeaShore Forum since May 2001. On February 25, 2003, Council authorized the Mayor to sign an Agreement for the SeaShore Transportation Forum and approved expenditures of $500 per year for payment of membership in the Forum from the City Council operating budget beginning in 2004. The Agreement for the SeaShore Transportation Forum approved by Council in February 2003 has expired. Attached is a new Agreement that was approved by the Forum on December 13, 2006 and provides for continuation of the Forum through 2008. The new Agreement is essentially the same as the previous Agreement, with only minor revisions. The SeaShore Forum Agreement states that each member city should designate two elected officials as representatives to the Forum. Alternate representatives may also be designated. The alternate may be an elected official or high-level staff member as best serves both the jurisdiction and the SeaShore Forum. The City of Edmonds’ designated representatives to the SeaShore Forum for 2006 were Councilmembers Olson and Moore. Our designated representatives for 2007 are Council President Olson and Councilmember Marin. The Edmonds Traffic Engineer also represents the City of Edmonds on the SeaShore Forum Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which provides staff input to the SeaShore Forum. The Agreement requires each member city to contribute $500 annually, to be used for special events, public education, or other expenses authorized by the SeaShore Forum. The Forum will determine by June 30 of each year whether an additional financial contribution will be requested of the member jurisdictions and agencies. A modification to the Agreement specifying cost-sharing, purpose, scope of work and other details is required to obligate a member jurisdiction to a change in funding participation. Each party to the Agreement may withdraw from participation by giving 30 days advance written notice. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Agreement as to form. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: SeaShore Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/03/2007 01:18 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/09/2007 10:17 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/09/2007 10:33 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/09/2007 11:05 AM APRV Form Started By: Dave Gebert Started On: 01/03/2007 11:47 AM Final Approval Date: 01/09/2007 AM-785 2.F. Interurban Trail, PUD Quitclaim Deed Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Dave Gebert, Engineering Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed from Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 for portions of the Pacific Northwest Traction Company Right-of-Way for purposes of construction, operation and maintenance of the Interurban Trail project within the City of Edmonds, and authorization for the City Clerk to record said Quitclaim Deed. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the Quitclaim Deed from Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 for portions of the Pacific Northwest Traction Company Right-of-Way for purposes of construction, operation and maintenance of the Interurban Trail project within the City of Edmonds, and authorize the City Clerk to record said Quitclaim Deed. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The City is currently in the design and permitting phase for the Edmonds portion of the Interurban Trail. This project will extend the Interurban Trail from the Snohomish/King county line, through the Lake Ballinger area of Edmonds, to 228 th Street SW in Mountlake Terrace. It will complete a missing link in this regional trail and will connect the existing trail in Mountlake Terrace and the recently constructed segment in Shoreline. See project description, Attachment 1. The planned route for the Interurban Trail will follow the route of the old Interurban Railroad, the Pacific Northwest Traction Company right-of-way, which is presently used by Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 (PUD) as a utility corridor. The Interurban Trail project will be funded in large part by grants, and it will be necessary to demonstrate to the granting agencies that the City owns the rights to use the route for the trail, either by owning the right-of-way or by appropriate easements. Exhaustive title research revealed that the PUD’s ownership of marketable title to the old Interurban Railroad right-of-way is clouded by the language of conveyance documents in the recorded chain of title. However, the PUD’s open dominion and control of the property for many years likely will allow the City as the PUD’s successor in interest to successfully assert a claim of title to all or at least a significant portion of the property. The City Attorney has advised a two step process for the City to obtain clear title to the needed right-of-way. The first step is for the PUD to quitclaim the rights they have to the right-of-way to the City. The second step will be for the City to then pursue a quiet title action to obtain clear title to the right-of-way for use for the Interurban Trail. Any property interest necessary for the desired trail construction which cannot be obtained through the quiet title action would then be purchased from the property owner identified in the quiet title proceeding. Without going through the quiet title action in Superior Court, the City could not be certain of which, if any, of the other potential owners of title to negotiate the purchase of the property. The Quitclaim Deed at Attachment 2 accomplishes the first step and quitclaims the PUD rights to the City, with a reservation of an easement for the PUD utility corridor. The Quitclaim Deed was prepared by the City Attorney and has been approved by the PUD Commissioners. Staff recommends that Council accept the Quitclaim Deed and authorize the City Clerk to record it with Snohomish County. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Project Description Link: Quitclaim Deed Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 01/03/2007 11:37 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/03/2007 11:39 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/03/2007 12:05 PM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/03/2007 01:54 PM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/04/2007 04:08 PM APRV Form Started By: Dave Gebert Started On: 01/03/2007 06:51 AM Final Approval Date: 01/04/2007 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0012_785_Interurban Trail, project descr sheet.doc PROJECT NAME: Interurban Trail Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $815,000 Matching Grant Funds WWRC/ IAC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Trail Development Complete public workshops, design and construction of the Edmonds link of the Interurban Trail connecting the northern portion constructed by Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace to the southern portion at Shoreline on the King County line. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Create a non-motorized trail system on the old Interurban Railroad Line from the City of Everett to Seattle. Create the missing link between completed Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace trail sections. SCHEDULE: 2006-2011 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $69,300 $693,000 $24,850 $9,900 $4,500 $4,500 1% for Art $700 $7,000 $150 $100 $50 $50 TOTAL $70,000 $700,000 $25,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. AM-795 2.G. Professional Services Agreement with Patton Boggs, LLC Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Stephen Clifton, Community Services Time:Consent Department:Community Services Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between City of Edmonds and Patton Boggs, LLC - Update and Addendum #1. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff For Information Purposes Only. Previous Council Action August 2, 2005 - City Council authorized the issuance of a notice requesting Statements of Qualifications from firms or individuals with the experience and qualifications needed to effectively represent the City in Washington D.C. The Council also established a maximum budget of $48,000. January 3, 2006 - City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Patton Boggs LLP. January 17, 2006 - Professional Services Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Patton Boggs LLP signed. Narrative See Attached January 11, 2007 memorandum. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 08:49 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 08:59 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 09:36 AM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Clifton Started On: 01/10/2007 04:35 PM Final Approval Date: 01/11/2007 AM-796 2.H. Ratification of Mayor's Salary Effective 7/1/06 Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Debi Humann, Human Resources Time:Consent Department:Human Resources Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Ordinance ratifying a change to the Mayor's salary effective July 1, 2006 as approved by Council on May 16, 2006. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff This change was recommended by the Citizens' Commission on Compensation for Elected Officials in May 2006, and was approved for implementation by the Council at the meeting of May 16, 2006. Unfortunately, staff did not bring forward the ordinance at that time, therefore, the ordinance is being brought to Council now for approval. Previous Council Action At the City Council meeting of May 16, 2006, a presentation was made by HR Manager Debi Humann concerning the Mayor's salary increase and other recommendations of the Citizens' Commission on Compensation for Elected Officials (see attached segment of the Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes, page 8 and 9, dated May 16, 2006). The recommended salary increase for the Mayor was approved. Narrative Since the ordinance was not done May 2006 as was appropriate, and since it was only recently determined the ordinance had not been completed, the ordinance is being brought forward for Council approval at this time. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Ordinance Link: Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 08:53 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 08:59 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 09:36 AM APRV Form Started By: Debi Humann Started On: 01/10/2007 06:04 PM Final Approval Date: 01/11/2007 AM-799 2.I. 2007 LTDGO Bond Ordinance Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Dan Clements, Administrative Services Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee:Finance Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, relating to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of not to exceed $5,500,000.00 par value of Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2007, of the City for general City purposes to provide funds with which to (a) repay and redeem the City’s Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Anticipation Note, 2005 and its Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Anticipation Note, 2006; (b) pay or reimburse the City for HVAC improvements to City facilities; (c) pay or reimburse the City for the Anderson Center seismic project; (d) pay or reimburse the City for energy conservation measures; (e) pay or reimburse the City for utility improvements (collectively, the “Projects”) and (f) pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing the date, form, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond redemption fund and construction funds; and providing for the public sale of the bonds. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve ordinance and resulting bond issue. Previous Council Action All projects, except the 2007 Energy Conservation, were approved by Council as part of earlier Budget deliberations. At the January 9 Finance Committee meeting approval was given to include the Energy Conservation projects, and forward to the full Council as a Consent item. The 2007 Energy Conservation projects were not included in the 2007-08 Budget because consultant repayment analysis was not received until mid-November, after budget discussions were well along. Narrative The bond issue contains the following projects and repayment sources. Project TOTAL Repayment Source COST General Utility Street REET GRAND TOTAL $5,123,200 $888,400 $3,766,000 $68,800 $400,000 Treatment Plant 2005 BAN $2,000,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 HVAC Project 2006 $650,000 650,000 0 0 0 Anderson Center Seismic 2007 $400,000 0 0 0 400,000 Energy Conservation 2007 $408,200 238,400 101,000 68,800 0 Utility 2007 $1,665,000 0 1,665,000 0 0 Next steps include finalizing an Official Statement, marketing the issue, and bringing the purchase offer back to Council for their approval. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 2007 LTD GO Bond Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 02:56 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 04:11 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 08:20 AM APRV Form Started By: Dan Clements Started On: 01/11/2007 11:13 AM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 50755286.3 CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ___________________ AN ORDINANCE o f t he City of Edmonds, Washington, relat ing to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of not to exceed $5,500,000 par value o f L imited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2007, of the Cit y fo r general City purposes to provide funds with which to (a) repay and redeem the City’s Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Ant ic ipat io n Note, 2005 and its Limited Tax General Obligat ion Bond Anticipation Note, 2006; (b) pay or reimburse the City fo r HVAC improvements to Cit y fac ilit ies; (c) pay or reimburse the Cit y fo r the Anderson Center seismic pro ject; (d) pay or reimburse the Cit y fo r energy conservation measures; (e) pay or reimburse the City fo r utility improvements (collect ively, the “Projects”) and (f) pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing the date, form, maturit ies, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond redempt io n fu nd and construction funds; and providing fo r the public sale o f t he bonds. Passed ___________________ This document prepared by: Foster Pepper PLLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 447-4400 -i- 50755286.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 .Debt Capacit y......................................................................................................1 Section 2 .Authorizat io n of Bonds .......................................................................................1 Section 3 .Descript io n of Bonds ...........................................................................................2 Section 4 .Registration and Transfer of Bonds......................................................................2 Section 5 .Payment of Bonds ...............................................................................................3 Section 6 .Redemption Provisio ns and Open Market Purchase of Bonds ..............................3 Section 7 .Notice of Redempt io n..........................................................................................4 Section 8 .Failure To Redeem Bonds ...................................................................................5 Section 9 .Pledge of Taxes ...................................................................................................5 Section 10 .Form and Execut io n of Bonds .............................................................................5 Section 11 .Bond Registrar ....................................................................................................6 Section 12 .Preservat io n of Tax Exempt io n fo r Interest on Bonds ..........................................6 Section 13 .Designat io n of Bonds as “Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligat io ns.”...........................6 Section 14 .Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds ................................................................7 Section 15 .Bond Fund and Deposit of Bond Proceeds ...........................................................7 Section 16 .Provisio n fo r Sale of Bonds and Notice of Sale....................................................8 Section 17 .Preliminary Official Statement ............................................................................9 Section 18 .Undertaking to Provide Cont inuing Disclosure ....................................................9 Section 19 .General Authorization .......................................................................................12 Section 20 .Effect ive Date of Ordinance ..............................................................................12 -1- 50755286.3 CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. _________________________ AN ORDINANCE o f t he City of Edmonds, Washington, relat ing to contracting indebtedness; providing for the issuance of not to exceed $5,500,000 par value o f L imited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2007, of the City fo r general City purposes to provide funds with which to (a) repay and redeem the City’s Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Ant ic ipat io n Note, 2005 and its Limited Tax General Obligat io n Bond Anticipation Note, 2006; (b) pay or reimburse the Cit y fo r HVAC improvements to Cit y fac ilit ies; (c) pay or reimburse the Cit y fo r the Anderson Center seismic pro ject; (d) pay or reimburse the Cit y fo r energy conservation measures; (d) pay or reimburse the City fo r utility improvements (collect ively, the “Projects”) and (e) pay the costs of issuance and sale of the bonds; fixing the date, form, maturit ies, interest rates, terms and covenants of the bonds; establishing a bond redempt io n fu nd and construction funds; and providing fo r the public sale o f t he bonds. WHEREAS, the Cit y o f Edmonds, Washington (the “City”), is in need o f financing for the Projects as defined in Sect io n 1, below, the estimated total cost of which is mo re than $5,200,000, and the Cit y does not have available sufficient funds to pay the cost; WHEREAS, to pay costs of the Projects, the City Council finds it necessary and advisable that the City issue and sell its limit ed tax general obligat io n bonds in the principal amount of not to exceed $5,125,000 (the “Bonds”);NOW, THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN as fo llo ws: Section 1.Debt Capacit y. The assessed valuat io n of the taxable property wit hin the City as ascertained by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for the calendar year 2007 is $6,665,146,142.The Cit y has outstanding general indebtedness evidenced by limited tax general obligat io n bonds, notes,leases and condit ional sales contracts in the principal amount of $17,346,815 incurred wit hin the limit o f up to 1½ % of the value o f t he taxable property wit hin the City permitted for general municipal purposes without a vote of the qualified voters therein, unlimited tax general obligatio n bonds in the principal amount of $7,375,294 incurred within the limit of up to 2½ % of the value o f t he taxable property within the Cit y fo r capital purposes only, issued pursuant to a vote of the qualified voters of the Cit y,and the amount of indebtedness for which bonds are authorized herein to be issued is not to exceed $5,500.000. Section 2.Authorizat io n o f Bonds. The City shall borrow money on the credit of the City and issue negotiable limited tax general obligation bonds evidencing that indebtedness as described in Sect io n 3,fo r general Cit y purposes to provide the funds to: (a) repay and redeem the City’s Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Ant ic ipation Note,2005 and its Limited Tax General Obligat io n Bond Ant ic ipat io n Note, 2006; (b) pay or reimburse the City fo r HVAC -2- 50755286.3 improvements to Cit y facilit ies; (c) pay or reimburse the City for the Anderson Center seismic project; (d) pay or reimburse the Cit y fo r energy conservat io n measures; (d) pay or reimburse the City fo r utility improvements (collect ively, the “Projects”) and (e) pay the costs of issuance and sale o f t he bonds (the “costs of issuance”). The general indebtedness to be incurred shall be within the limit of up to 1½ % of the value of the taxable property wit hin the Cit y per mitted for general municipal purposes without a vote of the qualified voters therein. Section 3.Descript io n of Bonds. The bonds shall be called the Limited Tax General Obligat io n Bonds, 2007 of the City (the “Bonds”) and shall be in the amount of not to exceed $5,500,000, or such lesser principal amount that will produce sufficient proceeds to provide no mo re than $5,125,000 to pay costs of carrying out the Projects, plus the additio nal proceeds required to pay the costs of issuance.The Bonds shall be dated the date of their initial delivery; shall be issued in fully registered form; shall be in the denominat io n o f $5,000 or any integral mult iple thereof wit hin a single maturit y; shall be numbered separately, in the manner and with any addit io nal designation as the Bond Registrar deems necessary for purposes of identificat io n; and shall contain such addit io nal terms as are specified in a reso lut io n o f t he Cit y Co uncil confirming the terms of the sale of the Bonds, in accordance with Sect io n 16 (the “Bond Sale Reso lut io n”). The Bonds shall bear interest (computed on the basis of a 360-day year o f t welve 30-day mo nt hs), payable semiannually on each succeeding June 1 and December 1, commencing June 1, 2007, to the maturity or earlier redempt io n of the Bonds, at such rate or rates as the Council shall establish in the Bond Sale Reso lut io n. Only one interest rate may be specified for Bonds of the same maturit y. The Bonds shall mature or be subject to mandatory redemption on December 1 in each year beginning in 2007 through and including the final maturit y,which shall be no later than December 1, 2018 (and may be earlier), all in accordance with the maturity schedule set forth in the Bond Sale Reso lut io n. Section 4.Registration and Transfer of Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall be recorded on books or records maintained by t he Bond Registrar (the “Bond Register”). The Bond Register shall contain the name and mailing address of the owner of each Bond and the principal amount and number of each of the Bonds held by each owner. Bonds surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for Bonds in any authorized deno minat io n o f a n equal aggregate principal amount and of t he same interest rate and maturity. Bonds may be transferred only if endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer shall be without cost to the owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange or transfer any Bond during the 15 days preceding any principal payment or redemptio n date. The Bonds init ially shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”). The Bonds so registered shall be held in fully immo bilized form by DTC as depository in accordance wit h t he provisio ns of a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations dated Au gust 6, 1996 between the Cit y and DTC (as it -3- 50755286.3 may be amended fro m t ime to time, the “Letter of Representations”). Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibilit y or obligat io n t o DTC participants or the persons for who m t hey act as nominees wit h respect to the Bonds regarding accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or DTC participants of a ny amount in respect of principal of o r interest on the Bonds, or any notice which is permitted or required to be given to registered owners hereunder (except such notice as is required to be given by the Bond Registrar to DTC). For as lo ng as any Bonds are held in fully immo bilized form, DTC, its nominee or its successor depository shall be deemed to be the registered owner for all purposes hereunder and all references to registered owners, bondowners, bondho lders or the like shall mean DTC or its no minee and, except for the purpose of the Cit y’s undertaking herein to provide cont inuing disclosure,shall not mean the owners of any beneficial interests in the Bonds. Registered ownership of such Bonds, or any portions thereof, may not thereafter be transferred except: (i) to any successor of DTC or its nominee, if that successor shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it ; (ii) to any subst it ute depository appointed by the Cit y o r such substitute depository’s successor; or (iii) to any person if the Bonds are no longer held in immo bilized form. Upon the resignat io n of DTC or its successor (or any subst it ut e depository or its successor) from its funct io ns as depository, or a determination by the City t hat it no longer wishes to continue the system of book entry transfers through DTC or its successor (or any subst it ut e depository or its successor), the City may appo int a subst it ute depository. Any such subst it ut e depository shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it. If (i) DTC or its successor (or subst it ute depository or its successor) resigns fro m it s funct io ns as depository, and no subst it ut e depository can be obtained, or (ii) the Cit y determines that the Bonds are to be in certificated form, the ownership of Bonds may be transferred to any person as provided herein and the Bonds no longer shall be held in fully immo bilized form. Section 5.Payment of Bonds. Both principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful mo ney o f the United States of America. Interest on the Bonds shall be paid by checks or drafts o f t he Bond Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to the registered owners at the addresses appearing on the Bond Register on the 15th day o f the mo nt h preceding the interest payment date or, if requested in writ ing by a registered owner of $1,000,000 or more in principal amount of Bonds prior to the applicable record date, by wire transfer on the interest payment date. Principal o f t he Bonds shall be payable upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds by the registered owners to the Bond Registrar. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as lo ng as the Bonds are regist ered in the name of DTC or its nominee, payment of principal of and int erest on the Bonds shall be made in the manner set forth in the Letter of Representations. Section 6.Redemption Provisio ns and Open Market Purchase of Bonds. Some maturit ie s of the Bonds may be issued without the right or option of the City t o redeem those Bonds prior to their stated maturity dates, as designated in the maturit y sc hedule set forth in the Bond Sale Reso lut io n.Except for those maturities so designated as not subject to optional redempt io n prior to maturity, the City reserves the right and option to redeem the Bonds as a who le o r in part (within one or more maturit ie s selected by the Cit y a nd rando mly wit hin a -4- 50755286.3 maturit y in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine), at par plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redempt io n. The Cit y Director of Administrative Services may prescribe in the bid forms the optional and mandatory redemption provisions that he determines are most advantageous to the Cit y. All or some of the Bonds ma y be designated as Term Bonds by the successful bidder. If those Term Bonds are not redeemed under the optional redempt io n provisio ns set forth above or purchased in the open market under the provisions set forth below, they shall be called for redempt io n rando mly (in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine) at par plus accrued int erest on August 1 in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Bond Sale Resolut io n. If the Cit y redeems Term Bonds under the optional redemptio n provisions, purchases in the open market or defeased Term Bonds, the par amount of the Term Bonds so redeemed or purchased (irrespective of their actual redemption or purchase prices) shall be credited against one or more scheduled mandatory redempt io n amounts fo r those Term Bonds. The Cit y s hall determine the manner in which the credit is to be allocated and shall notify the Bond Registrar in writing o f it s allocation at least 60 days prior to the earliest mandatory redemptio n date for that maturit y of Term Bonds for which notice of redempt io n has not already been given..Portions o f the principal amount of any Bond, in installments of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, may be redeemed. If less than all o f t he principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of that Bond to the Bond Registrar, there shall be issued to the registered owner, without charge therefor, a new Bond (or Bonds, at the option of t he registered owner) of the same maturit y a nd int erest rate in any o f t he deno minat io ns authorized by this ordinance in the aggregate principal amount remaining unredeemed. The Cit y further reserves the right and option to purchase any or all of t he Bonds in the open market at any t ime at any price acceptable to the City p lu s accrued interest to the date of purchase. All Bonds purchased or redeemed under this section shall be canceled. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as long as the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its no minee, select io n o f Bonds for redemption shall be in accordance with the Letter of Representations. Section 7.Notice of Redempt io n. The City shall cause notice of any intended redempt io n of Bonds to be given not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed fo r redempt io n by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the registered owner of any Bond to be redeemed at the address appearing on the Bond Register at the time the Bond Registrar prepares the notice, and the requirements of this sentence shall be deemed to have been fulfilled when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by the owner of any Bond. Interest on Bonds called for redempt io n shall cease to accrue on the date fixed for redempt io n unless the Bond or Bonds called are not redeemed when presented pursuant to the call. In addit io n, the redempt io n notice shall be mailed wit hin the same period, postage prepaid, to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., and Standard & Poor’s at their offices in New York, New York, or their successors, to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and to such other persons, including registered securit ies depositories, if any,and with such addit io nal informat io n as the City -5- 50755286.3 Director of Ad ministrative Services shall determine, but these additio nal mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redempt io n o f Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as long as the Bonds are registered in the name o f DTC or its no minee, notice of redempt io n shall be given in accordance wit h t he Letter of Representations. Section 8.Failure To Redeem Bonds. If any Bond is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturit y o r call date, the City shall be obligated to pay interest on that Bond at the same rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturit y or call date until that Bond, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the bond redempt io n fund hereinafter created and the Bond has been called for payment by giving notice o f t hat call to the registered owner of each of those unpaid Bonds. Section 9.Pledge of Taxes. For as lo ng as any of the Bonds are outstanding, the Cit y irrevocably pledges to include in its budget and levy taxes annually within the constit ut io nal and statutory tax limitat io ns provided by law wit hout a vote of the electors of the Cit y on all o f t he taxable property within the Cit y in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to be used therefor, to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds, and the full fait h, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the annual levy and collect io n o f t hose taxes and the prompt payment of t hat principal and interest.The proceeds o f real estate excise taxes imposed by Ordinance 2462 are pledged, as necessary, to the payment of that portion of the Bonds allo cated to the Anderson Center seismic upgrades. Section 10.Form and Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be printed or lit hographed on good bond paper in a form consistent with the provisio ns o f t his ordinance and state law and shall be signed by the Mayor and Cit y Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and the seal of t he City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. Only Bonds bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the follo wing form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the fully registered Cit y o f Edmonds, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligat io n Bonds, 2007, described in the Bond Ordinance. WASHINGTON STATE FISCAL AGENT Bond Registrar By Authorized Signer The authorized signing o f a Cert ificate of Authent icat io n shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authent icated has been duly executed, authent icated and delivered and is ent it led to the benefits of this ordinance. If any o fficer whose facsimile signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before the Bonds bearing his or her facsimile signature are authent icated or delivered by the Bond Registrar or issued by the Cit y,those Bonds nevertheless -6- 50755286.3 may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the Cit y as though that person had continued to be an officer of the Cit y authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of t he Cit y by any perso n who, on the actual date of signing of t he Bond, is an officer of the Cit y authorized to sign bonds, although he or she did not hold the required office on the date of issuance of the Bonds. Section 11.Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, which shall be open to inspection by the Cit y at all t imes. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of t he Cit y,to authent icate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the Cit y’s paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar’s powers and dut ie s under this ordinance and City Ordinance No. 2451 establishing a system of registration for the Cit y’s bonds and obligations. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Bond Registrar’s Certificate of Authentication on the Bonds. The Bond Registrar may become t he owner of Bonds wit h t he same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of it s o fficers or directors to act as members of,or in any other capacit y with respect to, any co mmittee formed to protect the rights of Bond owners. Section 12.Preservat io n of Tax Exempt io n fo r Interest on Bonds. The Cit y co venants that it will take all act io ns necessary to prevent interest on the Bonds from be ing included in gross inco me fo r federal inco me tax purposes, and it will neit her take any act io n nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the Bonds or other funds of t he Cit y t reated as proceeds of the Bonds at any t ime during the term of the Bonds which will cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross inco me for federal inco me tax purposes. The Cit y a lso covenants that it will, to the extent the arbitrage rebate requirement of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), is applicable to the Bonds, take all actio ns necessary to comply (or to be treated as having comp lied) wit h t hat requirement in connect io n wit h t he Bonds, including the calculat io n and payment of any penalt ies that the City has elected to pay as an alternative to calculat ing rebatable arbitrage, and the payment of any other penalties if required under Sect io n 148 of the Code to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income for federal inco me tax purposes. Section 13.Designat io n of Bonds as “Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligat io ns.”The City has determined and certifies that (a)the Bonds are not “private act ivit y bonds”within the meaning of Sect io n 141 o f t he Code; (b)the reasonably ant ic ipated amount of t ax-exempt obligat io ns (other than private activit y bo nds and other obligat io ns not required to be included in such calculat io n) which the Cit y and any ent it y su bordinate to the City (including any ent it y t hat the City controls, that derives its authorit y t o issue tax-exempt obligations fro m t he Cit y,or that issues tax-exempt obligat io ns on behalf o f the Cit y) will issue during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued will not exceed $10,000,000; and (c)the amount of tax-exempt obligat io ns, including the Bonds, designated by the Cit y a s “qualified tax-exempt obligat io ns”fo r the purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued does not exceed $10,000,000. The Cit y d esignates the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligat io ns”fo r the purposes of Sect io n 265(b)(3) of the Code. -7- 50755286.3 Section 14.Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds. The City may issue refunding bonds pursuant to the laws of t he State of Washington or use money available from any other lawful source to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or any portion thereof included in a refunding or defeasance plan, and to redeem and retire, refund or defease all such then-outstanding Bonds (hereinafter collectively called the “defeased Bonds”) and to pay the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If money and/or “government obligat io ns”(as defined in chapter 39.53 RCW, as now or hereafter amended) maturing at a t ime or times and bearing int erest in amounts (together with money, if necessary) sufficient to redeem and retire, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in accordance with t heir terms are set aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemptio n, retirement or defeasance of defeased Bonds (hereinafter called the “trust account”), then all right and interest of the owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bonds shall cease and become vo id. The owners o f defeased Bonds shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds fro m the trust account. The City shall include in the refunding or defeasance plan such provisions as the Cit y deems necessary for the rando m selection o f a ny defeased Bonds that constitute less than all of a part icu lar maturit y o f the Bonds, for notice of the defeasance to be given to the owners of the defeased Bonds and to such other persons as the City shall determine, and for any required replacement of Bond cert ific ates for defeased Bonds. The defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding, and the City may apply any money in any other fund or account established for the payment or redempt io n of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purposes as it shall determine. If the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its no minee, notice o f a ny defeasance of Bonds shall be given to DTC in the manner prescribed in the Letter of Representations for notices of redempt io n of Bonds. Section 15.Bond Fund and Deposit of Bond Proceeds. There is created and established in the office of the Cit y F inance Director a special fund designated as the Limited Tax General Obligat io n Bond Fund, 2007 (the “Bond Fund”), for the purpose of paying principal of and int erest on the Bonds. Accrued interest on the Bonds, if any, received from the sale and delivery of the Bonds shall be paid into the Bond Fund. All taxes collected for and allocated to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Bond Fund. The City Finance Director is authorized and directed to establish special accounts or funds, each designated as a 2007 Bond account or fund, within each of the fo llo wing funds: the Capital Improvement Fund 414, the General Fund 001, the Building Maintenance Fund 116, and the Combined Utilit y Co nstruction Fund 412 (together, the “Construction Funds”).The principal proceeds and premium, if any,received fro m t he sale and delivery o f t he Bonds shall be paid into the Construction Funds and used for the purposes specified in Sect io n 2 o f t his ordinance. Unt il needed to pay the costs of the Project and costs of issuance of the Bonds, the Cit y may invest principal proceeds temporarily in any legal investment, and the investme nt earnings may be retained in the Construction Funds and be spent for the purposes of that fund except that earnings subject to a federal tax or rebate requirement may be withdrawn fro m t he Construction Funds and used for those tax or rebate purposes. -8- 50755286.3 Section 16.Provisio n fo r Sale of Bonds and Notice of Sale. The Bonds shall be offered for sale at compet it ive bid. The Director of Administrative Services is authorized to fix a date and t ime of sale of t he Bonds, to give notice of the sale, to determine the bid requirements and the criteria for determining the best bidder, and to specify such other matters as she may determine necessary to carry out the sale of the Bonds, so long as the manner and terms of the sale thereof are consistent with this ordinance. The Director of Ad ministrative Services may, at his discret io n, provide for the use of an electronic bidding mechanism in connection with the bidding for the sale o f t he Bonds. The Cit y reserves the right to waive any irregularit y in any bid or in the bidding process. The final terms of the Bonds shall be confirmed by the Bond Sale Reso lut io n adopted by City Council, which may provide for the matters described in this ordinance and such other matters that the City Council deems necessary, appropriate, or desirable to carry out the purposes of this o rdinance. The Bond Sale Reso lut io n may provide for bond insurance, and may provide conditio ns or covenants relat ing thereto, including addit io nal terms, condit io ns, and covenants relating to the Bonds that are required by the bond insurer, and are consistent with the provisions o f t his ordinance, including but not limited to restrictio ns on investments and requirements of notice to and consent of the bond insurer. The Bond Sale Resolut io n may approve and authorize the execution and delivery on behalf of the Cit y o f any contracts and other documents consistent with the provisions of this ordinance for which the Cit y’s approval is necessary or to which the City is a party and that are related or incidental to the issuance and sale of t he Bonds or to the establishment of the interest rate or rates on the Bonds, including but not limited to agreements with bond insurers and underwriters. The Mayor and the Director of Administrative Services are each separately authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, any contracts and other documents consistent with the provisions of this ordinance for which the City’s approval is necessary or to which the Cit y is a part y a nd that are related or incidental to the issuance and sale of the Bonds. CUSIP numbers will be printed on the Bonds if requested in the bid of the successful bidder, but neither failure to print CUSIP numbers on any Bond nor error with respect thereto shall const it ute cause for a failure or refusal by the successful bidder to accept delivery o f a nd pay for the Bonds in accordance wit h it s bid. All expenses in relat io n to the print ing o f CUSIP numbers on the Bonds shall be paid by the Cit y,but the fee of the CUSIP Service Bureau for the assignment of those numbers shall be the responsibility o f a nd shall be paid by the successfu l bidder. If, prior to the delivery of the Bonds, interest on the Bonds receivable by the owners thereof beco mes includable in gross inco me fo r federal inco me t ax purposes, or becomes subject to federal inco me tax except as described in the official statement, the successful bidder, at its option, may be relieved of it s obligat io n t o purchase the Bonds, and in such case the deposit accompanying its bid will be returned, without interest. The Cit y will cause the Bonds to be printed, lit hographed or typed and signed and will furnish the approving legal opinion of Foster Pepper PLLC, bond counsel of Seattle, Washington, regarding the Bonds without cost to the purchaser. -9- 50755286.3 The Bonds will be delivered to the successful bidder in Seattle, Washington, within 30 days after the sale date and immediately upon payment to the City o f t he purchase price in immediately available federal funds in Seattle, Washington, at the City’s expense, or at another time or place upon which the Director of Ad ministrative Services and the successful bidder may agree at the successful bidder’s expense. Section 17.Preliminary Official Statement.The Cit y Council authorizes the Director of Ad ministrative Services to approve and, for the so le purpose o f t he Bond purchaser’s compliance wit h Securit ies and Exchange Co mmissio n Rule 15c2-12(b)(1), to “deem final” a Preliminary Official Statement as of its date, except for the omissio n of informat io n as to offering prices, interest rates, selling compensation, aggregate principal amount, principal amount per maturity, maturity dates, options of redempt io n, delivery dates, ratings and other terms of the Bonds dependent on such matters. Section 18.Undertaking to Provide Cont inuing Disclo sure. To meet the requirements of United States Securities and Exchange Co mmission (“SEC”) Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) (the “Rule”), as applicable to a participating underwriter for the Bonds, the Cit y makes the fo llowing written undertaking (the “Undertaking”) for the benefit of ho lders of the Bonds: (a)Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Material Events. The Cit y u ndertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either direct ly o r through a designated agent: (i)To each nat io nally recognized municipal securitie s informat io n repository designated by the SEC in accordance with the Rule (“NRMSIR”) and to a state informat io n depository, if any, established in the State of Washington (the “SID”) annual financial informat io n and operating data of the t ype included in the final o fficial statement for the Bonds and described in subsection (b) of this section (“annual financial informat io n”); (ii)To each NRMSIR or the Municipal Securitie s Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”), and to the SID, timely notice of the occurrence of any of the follo wing events with respect to the Bonds, if material: (1)principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2)non-payment related defaults; (3)unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflect ing financial difficult ies; (4)unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficult ies; (5)subst it ution of credit or liquidit y providers, or their failure to perform; (6)adverse tax opinio ns or events affect ing the tax-exempt status of the Bonds; (7)mo dificat io ns to rights of ho ld ers of the Bonds; (8)Bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redempt io ns o f Term Bonds); (9)defeasances; (10)release, subst it ution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds; and (11)rating changes; and (iii)To each NRMSIR or to the MSRB, and to the SID, timely notice o f a failure by the Cit y t o provide required annual financial informat io n on or before the date specified in subsect io n (b) of this sect io n. -10- 50755286.3 (b)Type o f Annual Financial Informat io n Undertaken to be Provided. The annual financial information that the City undertakes to provide in subsect io n (a) of this sect io n: (i)Shall consist of (1) annual financial statements prepared (except as noted in the financial statements) in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental units, as such principles may be changed from t ime to time and as permitted by State law, which statements shall not be audited, except, however, that if and when audited financial statements are otherwise prepared and available to the City t hey will be provided; (2) a statement of authorized, issued and outstanding general obligatio n debt of the Cit y; (3) the assessed value o f t he property within the Cit y subject to ad valorem taxat io n; and (4) ad valorem tax levy rates and amounts and percentage of taxes collected; (ii)Shall be provided to each NRMSIR and the SID, not later than the last day of the nint h mo nt h after the end of each fiscal year of the City (currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such fiscal year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, co mmencing wit h the City’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2007; and (iii)May be provided in a single or mult iple documents, and may be incorporated by reference to other documents that have been filed with each NRMSIR and the SID, or, if the document incorporated by reference is a “final o fficial statement”wit h respect to other obligations of the City, that has been filed with the MSRB. (c)Amendment of Undertaking. The Undertaking is subject to amendment after the primary offering of the Bonds wit hout the consent of any ho lder of any Bond, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, participat ing underwriter, rating agency, NRMSIR, the SID or the MSRB, under the circumstances and in the manner permitted by the Rule. The Cit y w ill give notice to each NRMSIR or the MSRB, and the SID, of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a br ief statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type o f a nnual financial informat io n t o be provided, the annual financial informat io n containing the amended financial informat io n will include a narrative explanat io n of the effect of that change on the type of informat io n to be provided. (d)Beneficiaries. The Undertaking evidenced by this sect io n shall inure to the benefit of the Cit y a nd any ho lder of Bonds, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person. (e)Terminat io n o f Undertaking. The Cit y’s obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of a ll o f t he Bonds. In -11- 50755286.3 addition, the City’s obligat io ns under this Undertaking shall terminate if those provisions of the Rule which require the City to comply wit h t his Undertaking beco me legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason, as confirmed by an opinion of nat io nally recognized bond counsel or other counsel familiar with federal securit ies laws delivered to the Cit y, and the Cit y provides t imely notice of such termination to each NRMSIR or the MSRB and the SID. (f)Remedy for Failure to Comply wit h Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the Cit y lear ns o f a ny failure to comply with the Undertaking, the City will proceed with due diligence to cause such noncomp liance to be corrected. No failure by the Cit y or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking shall const it ute a default in respect of the Bonds. The sole remedy of any ho lder of a Bond shall be to take such actions as that holder deems necessary, including seeking an order of specific performance from an appropriate court, to compel the City or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking. (g)Designat io n o f O fficia l Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Director of Ad ministrative Services of the City (or such other officer of the City who may in the future perform the duties o f that office) or his or her designee is authorized and directed in his or her discretion to take such further actions as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to carry out the Undertaking of the City in respect of the Bonds set forth in this sectio n and in accordance with the Rule, including, without limitatio n, the fo llo wing actions: (i)Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided; (ii)Determining whether any event specified in subsection (a) has occurred, assessing it s materialit y wit h respect to the Bonds, and, if material, preparing and disseminat ing notice of its occurrence; (iii)Determining whether any person other than the Cit y is an “obligated person”within the meaning of the Rule with respect to the Bonds, and obtaining from such person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and notice of material events for that person in accordance wit h t he Rule; (iv)Select ing, engaging and co mpensat ing designated agents and consultants, including but not limited to financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the Cit y in carrying out the Undertaking; and (v)Effect ing any necessary amendment of the Undertaking. (h)Centralized Disseminat io n Ag ent. To the extent authorized by the SEC, the City may sat isfy t he Undertaking by transmitt ing the required filings using http://www.disclosureusa.org (or such other centralized disseminatio n agent as may be approved by the SEC). 50755286.3 CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Edmonds, Washington (the “City”), hereby certify as fo llo ws: 1.The attached copy of Ordinance No. ____ (the “Ordinance”) is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meet ing of the City Council o f t he Cit y held at the regular meet ing place thereof on _________________, 2007, as that ordinance appears on the minute book of the Cit y; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after publicat io n in t he Cit y’s offic ial newspaper; and 2.A quorum o f t he members o f t he Cit y Co uncil was present throughout the meet ing and a majorit y o f t hose members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ____ day of ____________, 2007. CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON _____________________________________ City Clerk AM-798 2.J. Glen-Daley Alley Improvements Project Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the Glen-Daley Alley Improvement project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council appropriate an additional $4,152 from the Fund 412 ending cash balance and accept the Glen-Daley Alley Improvements project. Previous Council Action On January 3, 2006, Council awarded the Glen-Daley Alley Improvements project to Precision Earthworks, Inc. in the amount of $67,744. Narrative The Glen-Daley Alley Improvements project was designed, inspected and accepted by City Staff. Project Budget - $105,000 Contractor (Precision Earthworks) - $ 70,255 Consultants: Geotech Investigation (HWA Geosciences) - $ 2,900 Materials Testing (Krazan & Associates) - $ 2,796 Advertising - $ 371 1% Arts - $ 743 Materials for work performed by PW crews - $ 8,743 Total Project Cost - $ 85,808 In addition to these costs, $23,344 was paid to Wilder Construction under separate contract for the 2006 Street Overlay Program with respect to Glen Street, taking the total project cost to $109,152. The 2006 adopted capital project budget for the Glen-Daley Alley Improvements project was $105,000. Staff recommends that Council appropriate an additional $4,152 from Fund 412 and accept the project. There are sufficient funds in the Fund 412 ending cash balance to fund this appropriation. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 01/11/2007 10:56 AM APRV 2 Public Works Noel Miller 01/11/2007 11:36 AM APRV 3 Admin Services Dan Clements 01/11/2007 01:27 PM APRV 4 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/11/2007 02:26 PM APRV 5 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/11/2007 02:26 PM APRV 6 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 02:57 PM APRV 7 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 04:11 PM APRV 8 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 08:20 AM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 01/11/2007 10:20 AM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 AM-800 3. New Chapter 16.43 establishing BD-Downtown Business Zones. Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:45 Minutes Department:Planning Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Continued deliberation and action on an ordinance adding a new Chapter 16.43 establishing BD-Downtown Business Zones and amending the City's Zoning Map to rezone certain property specified therein to BD categories. Public comment will be received. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1, which includes the referenced map in Exhibit 2). Previous Council Action City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation from the Planning Board on October 3, 2006, and completed initial deliberations on December 12, 2006. On December 19, 2006, Council deferred adoption of a final ordinance, and further discussion occurred on January 2, 2007, and on January 9, 2007. Narrative This is continued deliberation on an ordinance establishing new zones (BD - Downtown Business) in the city's downtown area. Public comment is being accepted. The current draft ordinance contained in Exhibit 1 includes all the changes generally agreed to by Council during the January 9, 2007, City Council meeting. These are: 1. An update to the footnote at the top of page 7, incorporating language from the IBC (International Building Code) to define the height of the ground floor as a "floor-to-floor" distance. 2. Updated language under "b" on page 10, suggested by Councilmember Wambolt to address height in the BD1 zone. 3. Updates recommended by Scott Snyder on pages 13 and 14 to remove unnecessary "notes" from the ordinance. 4. Updated language on page 12, Section D, to extend the parking requirement for residential uses to the BD1 zone. 5. Updated language on page 12, Section C.4.b, to allow transparent railings within required buiding step-backs. Council previously received a number of letters and email comments; these are not reproduced here but can be reviewed by referring to information from the January 9, 2007, Council meeting. We have attached the staff parking memo and Wiggins letter, in case there is more public comment regarding parking issues (see Exhibit 3). Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance. Link: Exhibit 2: Ordinance Exhibit A Link: Exhibit 3: Parking memo and Wiggins letter Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 03:00 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 04:11 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 08:20 AM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 01/11/2007 01:45 PM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 12/14/06 1/9/2007 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 16.43 RELATING TO BD-DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ZONING, AMENDING THE CITY’S ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY SPECIFIED THEREIN TO BD CATEGORIES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of its Planning Board and held public hearings regarding draft BD zone proposals on September 18, 2006 and deliberated regarding those amendments on October 3 and December 12, 2006, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the amendment enacting new BD- Downtown Business zones complies with the criteria of the Edmonds Community Development Code in consideration of criteria or in conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Edmonds, and WHEREAS, the City Council has also received the recommendation of the Planning Board and held public hearings regarding amendments to the City’s zoning map to enact certain changes to the zoning of properties within the BD-Downtown business zone, and WHEREAS, following public hearings on the aforementioned dates and the deliberation of City Council, the Council adopts the recommendation of its Planning Board, finding that the amendment of the City’s zoning map and the rezone of the properties specified therein in the attached Exhibit A are in conformance with the requirements and decisional criteria of the Edmonds Community Development Code, are consistent with the City’s {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Comprehensive Plans and are in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Edmonds, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended by the enactment of a new Chapter 16.43 BD-Downtown Business zone to read as follows: Chapter 16.43 BD – DOWNTOWN BUSINESS Sections: 16.43.000 Purposes. 16.43.010 Sub-districts. 16.43.020 Uses. 16.43.030 Site development standards. 16.43.040 Operating restrictions. 16.43.000 Purposes. The BD zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC. A. Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region. B. Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and pedestrian-oriented design elements, while protecting downtown’s identity. C. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown’s focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. D. Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multi-family residential uses. 16.43.010 Sub-districts. The “Downtown Business” zone is subdivided into five (5) distinct sub-districts, each intended to implement specific aspects of the Comprehensive Plan that pertain to the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center. Each sub-district contains its own unique mix of uses and zoning regulations, as described in this chapter. The five sub-districts are: {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - BD1 – Downtown Retail Core BD2 – Downtown Mixed Commercial BD3 – Downtown Convenience Commercial BD4 – Downtown Mixed Residential BD5 – Downtown Arts Corridor 16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1. Permitted Uses BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Commercial Uses Retail stores or sales A A A A A Offices A A A A A Service uses A A A A A Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X X X X Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant or food service establishment that also provides an on-site retail outlet open to the public A A A A A Automobile sales and service X A A X X Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents C A A A X Printing, publishing and binding establishments C A A A C Community-oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the Edmonds City Code A A A A A {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - Permitted Uses BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Residential Uses Single family dwelling A A A A A Multiple dwelling unit(s) A A A A A Other Uses Bus stop shelters A A A A A Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A A A A A Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) A A A A A Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C C A C Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 A A A A A Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B B B B B Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone B B B B X Commercial parking lots C C C C X Wholesale uses X X C X X Hotels and motels A A A A A Amusement establishments C C C C C Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions C C C C C Drive-in businesses C C A C X Laboratories X C C C X {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Permitted Uses BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use X X C X X Day-care centers C C C A C Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums X C C A X Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A A A A A Zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 C C C C A Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers X C C A X Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 C C C C C Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D D D D D Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC D D D D D A=Permitted Primary Use B=Permitted Secondary Use C=Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit D=Secondary Uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit X=Not Permitted {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - For Conditional Uses listed in Table 16.43-1, above, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met: 1. Access and parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular access shall be only be provided consistent with Chapter 18.80.060 ECDC. When a curb cut is necessary, it shall be landscaped to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and designed to be as unobtrusive as possible. 2. Design and landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street and contributes to the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four (4) feet in height along street lot lines shall only be permitted if they are at least 50% open, such as a lattice pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged, and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use, shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the following: a. architectural features or details; b. artwork; c. landscaping. 16.43.030 Site development standards. A. Table 16.43-2. Site Development Standards BD1 5 BD2 5 BD3 5 BD4 3 5 BD5 5 Minimum Lot Area 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Lot Width 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Street Setback 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Side Setback 1 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Rear Setback 1 0 0 0 0 0 Maximum Height 2 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ 25’ Minimum Height of Ground Floor 4 15’ 12’ 12’ 12’ 12’ 1 The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings and structures entirely below the surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line adjacent to residentially (R) zoned property. 2 Specific provisions regarding building heights are contained in Chapter 16.43.030.C ECDC. 3 Within the BD4 zone, site development standards listed in Table 16.43-2 apply when a building contains a ground floor consisting of commercial space to a depth of at least 60 feet measured from the street front of the building. If a proposed building does not meet this ground floor commercial space requirement (e.g. an entirely residential building is proposed), then the building setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. See ECDC 16.43.030.B.4 for further detail. {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 - 4 “Minimum height of ground floor” means the vertical distance from top to top of the successive finished floor surfaces; and, if the ground floor is the only floor above street grade, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the ceiling joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. “Floor finish” is the exposed floor surface, including coverings applied over a finished floor, and includes, but is not limited to, wood, vinyl flooring, wall-to-wall carpet, and concrete.the height measured from the base of the ground floor to the top of the ground floor ceiling plate, as illustrated in Figure 16.43-1. Figure 16.43-1 shows a ground floor height of 15 feet; note that the ‘finished’ ceiling height is only approximately 11 feet in this example. Existing buildings may be added onto or remodeled without adjusting the existing height of the ground floor to meet the specified minimum height so long as the addition or remodel does not increase the building footprint or its frontage along a street by more than 25%. 5 Site development standards for single family dwellings are the same as those specified for the RS-6 zone. Figure 16.43-1: Ground Floor Height Measurement B. Ground Floor. This section describes requirements for development of the ground floor of buildings in the BD zones. 1. When a commercial use is located on the ground floor, the elevation of the ground floor and associated entry shall be within 7 inches of the grade level of the adjoining sidewalk. “Grade” shall be as measured at the entry location. 2. When the street frontage of a building is on a slope which does not allow both the elevation of the entry and ground floor to be entirely within 7 inches of the grade level of the sidewalk, the building may be designed so that either: {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 - a. The entry for the commercial portion of the ground floor is located within 7 inches of the grade of the adjacent sidewalk, and the commercial portion of the ground floor is within 7 inches of the grade level of the entry; or, b. The building may be broken up into multiple frontages, so that each entry/ground floor combination is within 7 inches of the grade of the sidewalk. c. For corner lots, a primary entry shall be established for the purposes of determining where the ground floor entry rules detailed in this section shall apply. The first choice for the primary entry shall be either 5th Avenue or Main Street. In the case of the BD5 zone, the primary entry shall always be on 4th Avenue. 3. Within the BD1 zone, development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses. Within the BD2, and BD3 zones, development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses to a minimum building depth of 60 feet, as measured from the street front of the building. 4. Within the BD4 zone, there are two options for developing the ground floor of a building. One option is to develop the ground floor with commercial space, meeting the same requirements detailed for the BD2 and BD3 zones in ECDC 16.43.030.B.3, above. As a second option, if more residential space is provided so that the ground floor does not meet the commercial use requirements described in Chapter 16.43.030.B.3, above, then the building setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. In the case where RM-1.5 setbacks are required, the required street setback shall be landscaped and no fence or wall in the setback shall be over four (4) feet in height above sidewalk grade unless it is at least 50% open, such as in a lattice pattern. 5. Within the BD5 zone, one option is to develop the ground floor with commercial space, meeting the same requirements detailed for the BD2 zone in ECDC 16.43.030.B.3, above. When development of the ground floor does not conform to these requirements, then development within the BD5 zone shall meet the following requirements: a. The building shall be oriented to 4th Avenue. “Orientation to 4th Avenue” shall mean that: i. At least one building entry shall face 4th Avenue. ii. If the building is located adjacent to the public right-of-way, architectural details and/or applied art shall be incorporated into the building design to add interest at the pedestrian (i.e. ground floor) level. iii. If the building is set back from the street, landscaping and/or artwork shall be located between the building and the street front. b. Live/work uses are encouraged within the BD5 zone, and potential live/work space is required for new residential buildings if no other commercial use is provided on-site. i. If multiple residential uses are located on the ground floor, the building shall incorporate live/work space into the ground floor design in such a way as to enable building occupants to use portion(s) of their space for a commercial or art/fabrication use. Live/work space means a structure or portion of a structure that combines a commercial or manufacturing activity that is allowed in the zone with a residential living space for the owner of the commercial or manufacturing business, or the owner's employee, and that person's household. The live/work space shall be designed {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - so that a commercial or fabrication or home occupation use can be established within the space. Figure 16.43-_: BD5 Development Building at right (foreground) shows landscaping located between building and street. Building at left (background) shows commercial space integrated with residential uses, and the entry oriented to the street. 6. Exceptions and clarifications. The regulations for the ground floor contained in ECDC 16.43.030.B.1-5 (above) apply with the following exceptions or clarifications. a. That in all areas the provision of pedestrian access to permitted residential uses is allowed as a permitted secondary use. b. The restrictions on the location of residential uses shall not apply when a single-family use is the only permitted primary use located on the property. c. Parking is not considered to be a commercial use for the purposes of satisfying the ground floor commercial use requirement (i.e. when the first 60 feet of the building, as measured perpendicular to the street, is required to be in commercial use, parking may not be located within that 60 feet). However, for properties with less than 90 feet of depth measured from the street front, parking may be located in the rear-most 30 feet of the property, even if a portion of the parking extends into the first 60 feet of the building. In no case shall the depth of commercial space as measured from the street front of the building be less than 30 feet. d. Within the BD2, BD3 and BD4 zones, if the first 60 feet of the building as measured perpendicular to the street consists only of commercial uses and permitted secondary uses, then permitted multiple family residential unit(s) may be located behind the commercial uses. {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 - e. Within the BD1 zone, ground floor windows parallel to street lot lines shall be transparent and unobstructed by curtains, blinds, or other window coverings intended to obscure the interior from public view from the sidewalk. This provision does not apply to any residential uses located behind commercial uses. f. Within the BD1 zone, each commercial space located on the ground floor shall be directly accessible by an entry from the sidewalk. C. Building Height Regulations. 1. The basic height limit is 25 feet (see definition of “height” detailed in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC). 2. Step-back rules. The following rules apply when calculating the maximum building height for any building in the BD1, BD2, BD3, or BD4specified zone(s) (see Figures 16.43-2 and 16.43-3 for illustrated examples). a. Within the BD2, BD3, or BD4 zones, An an additional 5 feet of building height, not to exceed 30 feet, may be obtained if the building is designed to meet all of the following conditions: i. A building step-back is provided within 15 feet of any street front. Within the 15-foot step-back, the maximum building height is the lesser of 25 feet above grade at the property line (e.g. normally the back of sidewalk) or 30 feet above the “average level” as defined in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC. For corner lots, a 15-foot step-back is required along both street fronts. If a building located on a corner lot has insufficient lot width (i.e. less than 40 feet of lot width) to enable it to provide the required step- back on both street fronts, then the step-back may be waived facing the secondary street. This waiver may not be granted for building step-backs required from Fifth Avenue, Dayton, or Main Streets. ii. A 15-foot step-back is provided from the property line opposite the street front. Within the 15-foot step-back, the maximum building height is the lesser of 25 feet above grade or 30 feet above the “average level” as defined in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC. For corner lots for which a 15-foot step-back is required on more than one street front, there is no 15-foot step-back required from the property line opposite each street front. For the purpose of determining step-back requirements, alleys are not considered to be streets. iii. A building setback, in which the entire building is set back from the property line, may be substituted on a foot-for-foot basis for the required building step-back. For example, a 5-foot building setback can be combined with a 10-foot building step-back to meet the 15-foot step-back requirement. b. Within the BD1 zone, building height may be a maximum of 30 feet in order to provide for a minimum height of 15 feet for the ground floor. The allowable building height is measured from the "average level" as defined in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC.Within the BD1 zone, an additional 5 feet of building height, not to exceed 30 feet, may be obtained if the building is designed to meet all of the conditions specified under ECDC 16.43.030.C.2.a.(i-iii), except that within the 15-foot step-back, the maximum building height is the lesser of 30 feet above grade at the property line (e.g. normally the back of sidewalk) or 30 feet above the “average level” as defined in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC. {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 11 - {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 - 3. Within the BD5 zone, the maximum height may be increased to 30 feet if the building meets one of the following conditions. In addition, if the building is located within 15 feet of the public right-of-way, architectural details and/or applied art shall be incorporated into the building design, and the ground floor shall be distinguished from the upper portions of the building through the use of differences in materials, windows, and/or architectural forms. a. All portions of the building above 25 feet consist of a pitched roof such that the pitch of all portions of the roof are at least 6-in-12 and the roof includes architectural features, such as dormers or gables of a steeper pitch, that break up the roof line into distinct segments. b. If the building does not make use of a pitched roof system as described in (a), above, step backs shall be required the same as for the BD2 zone, as described in ECDC 16.43.030.C.2. 4. Height exceptions. In addition to the height exceptions listed in Chapter 21.40.030 ECDC, the following architectural features are allowed to extend above the height limits specified in this Chapter. a. A single decorative architectural element, such as a turret, tower, or clock tower, may extend a maximum of 5 feet above the specified height limit if it is designed as an integral architectural feature of the roof and/or façade of the building. The decorative architectural element shall not cover more than 5% of the roof area of the building. b. Roof or deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above the specified height limit within any building step-back required under ECDC 16.43.030.C.2, provided that the railing is constructed so that it has the appearance of being transparent. An example meeting this condition would be a railing that is comprised of glass panels. D. Off-Street Parking and Access Requirements. The parking regulations included here apply specifically within the BD zone. Whenever there are conflicts between the requirements of this Chapter and the provisions contained in ECDC 17.50 – Off-Street Parking Regulations, the provisions of this Chapter shall apply. 1. No parking is required for any permitted uses located within the BD1 zone. Within the BD1 zone, no new curb cuts are permitted along 5th Avenue or Main Street. 2. No parking is required for any commercial floor area of permitted uses located within the BD1, BD2, BD4, and BD5 zones. 3. No parking is required for any floor area in any building with a total building footprint of less than 4,800 square feet. E. Open Space Requirements 1. For buildings on lots larger than 12,000 square feet or having an overall building width of more than 120 feet (as measured parallel to the street lot line), at least 5% of the lot area shall be devoted to open space. Open space shall not be required for additions to existing buildings that do not increase the building footprint by more than 10%. Open space shall be provided adjacent to the street front (street lot line). Such open space may be provided as any combination of: {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - a. outdoor dining or seating areas (including outdoor seating or waiting areas for restaurants or food service establishments); b. public plaza or sidewalk that is accessible to the public; c. landscaping which includes a seating area that is accessible to the public. [Note: minimum % or sq. ft. requirement?] 2. Required open space shall be open to the air and not located under a building story. 3. In overall dimension, the width of required open space shall not be less than 75% of the depth of the open space, measured relative to the street (i.e. width is measured parallel to the street lot line, while depth is measured perpendicular to the street lot line). F. Historic Buildings. The exceptions contained in this section apply only to buildings listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Buildings. 1. If a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission under the provisions of Chapter 20.45 ECDC for the proposed project, the staff may modify or waive any of the requirements listed below that would otherwise apply to the expansion, remodeling, or restoration of the building. The decision of staff shall be processed as a Staff decision – Notice required, as provided for in ECDC 20.95.050. a. Building step backs required under ECDC 16.43.030.C.2. {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 14 - b. Open space required under ECDC 16.43.030.E. 2. No off-street parking is required for any permitted uses located within a building listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Buildings. Note that additional parking exceptions involving building expansion, remodeling or restoration may also apply, as detailed in 17.50.070.C. 3. Within the BD5 zone, if a building listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Buildings is retained on site, no off-street parking is required for any additional buildings or uses located on the same property. To obtain this benefit, an easement in a form acceptable to the City shall be recorded with Snohomish County protecting the exterior of the historic building and ensuring that the historic building is maintained in its historic form and appearance so long as the additional building(s) obtaining the parking benefit exist on the property. The easement shall continue even if the property is subsequently subdivided or any interest in the property is sold. G. Density. There is no maximum density for permitted multiple dwelling units. H. Screening. The required setback from R zoned property shall be landscaped with trees and ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the BD lot. A six-foot minimum height fence, wall or solid hedge shall be provided at some point in the setback, except for that portion of the BD zone that is in residential use. I. Signs, Parking and Design Review. See Chapters 17.50, 20.10, and 20.60 ECDC. Sign standards shall be the same as those that apply within the BC zone. [Note: update of sign code is required] J. Satellite Television Antennas. In accordance with the limitations established by the Federal Communications Commission, satellite television antennae greater than two meters in diameter shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC 16.20.050.Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050 and reviewed by the architectural design board. [Note: update required to 16.20.050 to reflect 2 meters for commercial antennas.] 16.43.040 Operating restrictions. A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building, except: 1. Public uses such as utilities and parks; 2. Off-street parking and loading areas, and commercial parking lots; 3. Drive-in businesses; 4. Plant nurseries; 5. Seasonal farmers’ markets; 6. Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.65 ECDC. 7. Bistro and outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.70.040 ECDC. 8. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC B. Nuisances. All uses shall comply with Chapter 17.60 ECDC, Performance Standards. {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 15 - Section 2. The official zoning map of the City of Edmonds is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown on the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Such incorporated changes amend the zoning of certain downtown properties to rezone such properties in conformance with the attached Exhibit A. The Development Services Director or his designee is hereby authorized to effectuate such changes to the official zoning map of the City. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS648055.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 16 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 16.43 RELATING TO BD-DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ZONING, AMENDING THE CITY’S ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY SPECIFIED THEREIN TO BD CATEGORIES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE 3RD AVE N 2ND AVE N MAGNOLIA LN 6TH AVE N SUNSET AVE N 4TH AVE N JAMES ST R AIL R O A D A V E 5TH AVE N HEMLOCK WAY HOWELL WAY SUNS ET AVE S GLEN ST HOLLY DR 2ND AVE N 2ND AVE 3RD AVE N CAROL WAY 3RD AVE N BELL ST MAIN ST 6TH AVE N DAYTON ST HOMELAND DR SATER LANE W D A Y T O N S T 3RD AVE S 4TH AVE S EDMONDS WY/SR 104 6TH AVE S 5TH AVE S WALNUT ST 5TH AVE S HEMLOCK WAY SEAMONT LN ERBEN DR 3RD AVE S R AIL R O A D S T GILTNER LANE DURBIN ST ALOHA WAY 2ND AVE S EDMONDS ST 6TH AVE S ALDER ST A D M IR A L W A Y 2ND AVE S 3RD AVE S 4TH AVE S PINE ST 4TH AVE S EDMONDS WAY/SR 104 4TH AVE S MAPLE ST DAYTON ST ALDER ST MAIN ST BELL ST EDMONDS ST DALEY ST SPRAGUE ST 5TH AVE S BELL ST MAIN ST Planning Board Recommendation 7/26/2006 BD1 = Downtown Retail Core BD2 = Downtown Mixed Commercial BD3 = Downtown Convenience Commercial BD4 = Downtown Mixed Residential BD5 = Downtown Arts Corridor RM-1.5 = Multi Family RM-1.5 BD1BD2 BD2 BD2 BD2BD4 BD3 BD5 BD2 BD2 BD4 Proposed New Downtown Zones RM-1.5 BD2 BD2 City of Edmonds Z Planning Division Date: January 5, 2007 To: Edmonds City Council From: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Subject: Parking Downtown At the January 2, 2007, City Council meeting, staff was requested to provide some comments on parking in the new BD zones, particularly some of the reasoning behind the proposed parking standards. This morning I have also received a copy of a letter addressed to the Council from Karen Wiggins. Since her comments during the January 2nd Council meeting appear to have been part of the basis for the Council request, I’ll also address the comments contained in her letter. General Points The Planning Board was well versed in the downtown parking study done in 2002-2003. The study’s basic conclusions were that downtown Edmonds did not have a parking supply problem, but rather a parking management problem. It should be noted that as a follow-up to the study the in-lieu-of fund was eliminated, due in large part to the fact that while the fund allowed a payment in-lieu-of providing on-site parking, it did not result in any new parking spaces actually being created downtown. When the Planning Board was developing the new downtown BD zones, the question of incentives was specifically highlighted. With bulk requirements for downtown being very tight – and with the step-back rules, there being no incentive-based opportunity to obtain any leaseable space above 30 feet – the discussion of incentives quickly focused on parking. The expressed goals for downtown included encouraging commercial uses. The Planning Board felt that since future development downtown was being significantly limited in bulk (the combination of height and step-backs), and since new construction was attempting to maximize residential uses, an incentive was needed to encourage commercial development. Not requiring parking for commercial uses while maintaining a parking standard for residential uses was the Planning Board’s proposed solution. This also made sense when you realize that the parking study – in its analysis of future demand – assumed continued development of three-story buildings downtown. If two-story buildings are the norm, it becomes nearly impossible to economically provide underground parking. Relief from the commercial parking requirement could help if more commercial space is a goal of downtown development, either in the form of additions to existing buildings or new buildings being constructed on the vacant or under-utilized lots in the downtown area. It is important to remember that the Planning Board maintained a parking requirement for residential uses in all of the MEMORANDUM downtown area outside the retail core – this comprises most of the downtown area. This means that any new residential development will still have an on-site parking requirement. The new code requirements also do not have any impact on the city’s established parking management strategies, including the employee parking program. The Retail Core Focusing on the retail core, the BD1 zone proposed no parking requirement for any uses. This was largely for two reasons. The evidence before the Planning Board was that two-story buildings don’t provide an economic basis for doing underground parking. Requiring parking in the retail core would therefore require surface parking, removing a significant amount of land from being developed for floor space. While some retail core properties have alley access, many do not. When alley access is not available, requiring parking will essentially require curb cuts to access parking located behind the building. In addition, with limited lot depths, a parking requirement combined with the two-story nature of the development standards will encourage retail core properties to provide their parking at grade, behind commercial uses, thereby minimizing the amount of ground-level commercial space for any building expansions or redevelopment that does occur downtown. This runs counter to encouraging a viable commercial core. Some thoughts on Ms. Wiggins’ letter Introductory paragraphs. As a parenthetical remark, I believe Ms. Wiggins’ comments are offered from her own perspective, since after discussion the Downtown Parking Committee as a whole did not support her conclusions or recommendations. This is not to discredit her comments, just to clarify her presentation. First main paragraph (“The suggestion to eliminate…”). The logic related to eliminating the parking requirement for commercial uses is outlined earlier in this memo. Remember that parking requirements in code are minimums. The market will dictate how much parking is actually provided. If the market was encouraging too little parking, then why would jurisdictions such as Seattle, Redmond, etc., be adopting maximum parking requirements in their codes? Even if a project is owner- or developer-financed, why would they wish to build something that would be unoccupied by tenants due to insufficient parking? Ms. Wiggins also asserts that “If you look at our city streets right now they are full,” and “If you overload them with more employees, where will the people park that would like to shop here?” First, consider the following excerpt from the 2002-2003 downtown parking study: Currently downtown Edmonds has about 3,500 parking spaces of which somewhat more than two-thirds is off-street private parking. The 2001 inventory and survey of occupancy suggests that over 50 percent of this parking was unoccupied. This suggests that downtown Edmonds currently has a surplus of parking, especially off-street parking. The study clearly concluded that while there are parking management issues and isolated problems, downtown Edmonds does not have a parking supply problem. Ms. Wiggins’ comment about employees taking parking away from shoppers ignores the city’s employee parking program, which also has far more capacity than is currently being utilized. Second main paragraph (“Another suggestion…”). The 15-foot ceiling heights for the BD1 zone and the 12-foot ceiling heights for the other BD zones have been a consistent proposal throughout the past couple years of public hearings and discussions. There is a substantial amount of testimony in the Planning Board and City Council records supporting these proposals. Retailers are on record in support of the 15-foot heights for the retail core. The City’s former Economic Development Director consistently pointed out the desirability of adequate ceiling heights to support both general commercial and retail uses. The recent downtown economic study by Heartland LLC also pointed out that shorter ceiling heights reduce rents; reduced rents provide a disincentive for developers to include commercial space as a significant component of their projects – at least in excess of the minimums required by code. An architect with the Planning Board pointed out that there is not a direct relationship between the volume of interior space and heating or cooling bills; it is much more a function of the efficiency and design of building systems and materials. Third main paragraph (“The final problem I see…”). The 15-foot step-back requirement was also a main feature of the Planning Board’s and Council proposals through the public hearing process. The step-back is not for “each succeeding floor over the first floor,” nor is necessarily required for all street frontages if you have a particularly small lot (this last problem was brought up and addressed by the Planning Board in its final recommendation to Council). The step-back is only required when a building exceeds 25 feet in height above the street. Generally, this should mean a step-back above the 2nd floor in the general BD commercial areas. The Council is still in discussion about the step-back requirements in the BD1 (retail core), but the clear intent seems to be to enable two-story buildings to be built in the retail core without requiring a step-back. In any case, Heartland LLC also addressed the question of step-backs, finding that “Upper-level setbacks have a slight negative impact on returns, but not project feasibility.” Finally, the 15-foot step-back was not chosen arbitrarily – it was the step-back measurement that would maintain a building appearance of two-stories when viewed from the adjoining street. Ms. Wiggins’ comment on railings is, I think, well taken. The Planning Board had recommended an exception for railings above the BD zone height limits, but that exception was deleted by Council in its December, 2006, deliberations. Fourth main paragraph (“I know this debating has gone for a long time…”). I agree that it has. The hearings and deliberations just on the zoning follow-up to the comprehensive plan have been going on since March of 2005. Restarting the discussion now would prolong the moratorium currently in place and be a disservice to the entire community. I can’t agree with Ms. Wiggins’ assertion that the city changed its rules to “allow a sunken first floor.” Up to this point, first floors have simply not been regulated by the city. Ms. Wiggins’ comment about the 30-foot minimum depth of commercial space is correct – it was a change in code dating from the 1990s intended to address problems related to narrow commercial lots. However, this actually relates to the parking discussion. The reason cited by the proponents for the 30-foot commercial depth was to allow parking to be placed behind the building that would also be accessed by a curb cut from the street, all needed to meet downtown parking requirements. The Planning Board agreed that this was a problem, which was, again, part of the basis for their parking recommendations. If the Council wishes to do some more follow-up study and discussion of any of the parking issues, for example, that would be appropriate – but staff would encourage the Council to take that on as a follow-up action to adopting the current BD zoning. We would recommend adopting the proposed parking and step-back provisions, as the Council is discussing, and set a timetable for revisiting any specified parking issues. That was actually already hinted at in earlier Council discussion, where Councilmember Dawson suggested that parking requirements might be “tweaked” to encourage affordable housing, for example. January 4, 2007 To Mayor Gary Haakenson and Edmonds City Council: I attended the Edmonds City Council meeting on 1/02/07 where the BD downtown business zone changes were discussed and explained. I have grave concerns with some of the changes suggested. I believe it to be obvious that these issues may not have been thought out thoroughly and that experts in the field have not been consulted to see what the results of some of these changes would. be. The suggestion to eliminate all parking requirements for commercial uses is something, as your City parking committee chairman, unconscionable. I know it is meant to be the proverbial “carrot” to attract new construction in downtown Edmonds and that it is felt that the bank will require commercial parking anyway. Please don’t count on that happening, especially with all the new money. A developer may choose to self finance. Please do not allow this misguided attempt at luring new development to cloud your reasoning. If you look at our city streets right now they are full. If you overload them with more employees, where will the people park that would like to shop here? Also I do not believe a tenant would rent in a city that provides no commercial parking spaces. It was suggested that maybe we could increase the residential parking spaces that were recently reduced to one vehicle per unit. What would that accomplish? They would belong to the residents and would not help out the lack of onsite commercial parking. Please take the time to talk to businesses in town to see what they think of this suggestion. If they knew their onstreet parking for their employees and customers would become more difficult to locate, I doubt they would support this amendment. At the very least, please require one commercial parking space per 800 sf. Another suggestion in the proposed new BD zone would be to require 15 foot ceiling heights in the retail core and 12 foot ceiling heights in the balance of the proposed BD zone (currently the BC zone). While I am not familiar with the way retail businesses work, as a construction company who has developed two projects in this city with commercial office uses in this downtown area, I know that if a tenant realized that the increased ceiling height would cost them more in heating and airconditioning costs, they would not take kindly to an increase in their costs just to gain the extra height. Again please talk to these people! The final problem I see with this document is the requirement to set back each succeeding floor over the first floor, a total of 15’ on all sides facing a street. I understand the reasoning behind this and I support it. The 15’ is just excessive. You would have just as good a result if you made the setback 6’ or 8’. It is the lack of massing on the street side that you are trying to overcome but how it is suggested to be done is detrimental. Everyone would use that area for a deck. Have you thought about deck railings? Have you thought how this excessive requirement would increase the cost of the residential unit? After all, if enough units cannot be built, the developer will just go to another city where the restrictions are not so stringent. I know this debating has gone on for a long time and you are all anxious to get something going so that builders and developers with once again start applying for building permits, something that has not happened since the 25’ moratoriam has been in place. Most of you were here when the city changed the rules to allow a sunken first floor entry and the requirement for 1st floor commercial space was allowed to only be 30’ deep on the entry side. What a disaster that has been! I believe that was caused by the lack of education on the issues. Important issues like this deserve the utmost education and study by the people making these very important decisions. The people of this city deserve nothing less. After all no one wants empty commercial space because there is no parking for it; greatly increased residential living unit prices because so much has had to be given over to deck space; or our new commercial space costing a tenant so much more than in other areas because they have to pay for such high ceiling space HVAC costs. Please give this your utmost care, education and thought because what you decide now either costs the city valuable real estate tax and sales tax income or enhances it, depending on whether or not you make the right decision. Sincerely, Karen M. Wiggins Downtown Edmonds Parking Chairman Wiggins Properties llc AM-801 4. Repealing Ordinance No. 3608 establishing a moratorium within the City's central business district. Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:10 Minutes Department:Planning Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Proposed Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 3608 establishing a moratorium within the City's central business district. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1). Previous Council Action The City Council adopted Ordinance #3530 which established a moratorium on new building approvals exceeding 25 feet in height within the BC zone. The council most recently extended the moratorium by adopting Ordinance #3608. Narrative On December 12, 2006, with approval of the new BD - Downtown Business zones, the City Council voted to remove the current moratorium on buildings exceeding 25 feet within the existing BC zone. The draft ordinance included in Exhibit 1 has been drafted by the City Attorney to implement this action. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 01/11/2007 03:40 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/11/2007 04:11 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 08:20 AM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 01/11/2007 02:49 PM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 {WSS648051.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 12/14/06 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3608 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM WITHIN THE CITY’S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, pursuant to series of ordinances, the City Council established and has maintained a moratorium on construction in certain designated downtown business districts above 25 feet in order to resolve building height calculations, and WHEREAS, by the enactment of a contemporary ordinance, the City Council has amended the City Code to clarify height restrictions, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 3608 is hereby repealed. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON {WSS648051.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS648051.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2006, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3608 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM WITHIN THE CITY’S CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2006. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE AM-802 5. Planning Board Recommendation to Deny Application to Create Two New Zones for Edmonds Way Corridor Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:60 Minutes Department:Planning Type:Action Review Committee:Community/Development Services Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Public Hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to deny an application by Tony Shapiro to create two new zones for the Edmonds Way Corridor. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff 1. Staff recommendation is to approve the creation of the new zones, with modifications recommended in the staff report (see Exhibit 1), and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for Council adoption. Note that the Planning Board recommended denial of the application. If Council chooses to deny the application, the City Attorney will prepare findings for the Council to adopt. Previous Council Action None regarding this request. Narrative This is an application by AD Shapiro/Valhalla Partners to create two new zones in the Edmonds Community Development Code for application within the Edmonds Way Corridor. One of the new zones would be a new multi family zone, termed "RM-EW," while the second new zone would be a commercial one, termed "BC - Edmonds Way." The proposal is described in the letter from the applicant together with the text of the proposed zones; these are contained in Attachments 2 and 3 of Exhibit 1. As an application to amend the Edmonds Community Development Code, this is a legislative proposal. The Planning Board held a public hearing on the request on December 13, 2006, and voted 3-to-2 to deny the request. The Planning Board minutes are contained in Exhibit 2. Exhibit 3 contains a letter from the applicant responding to the staff report together with a presentation they gave during the Planning Board hearing. Exhibit 4 contains letters received pertaining to the December 13, 2006, Planning Board hearing. The applicants originally proposed a somewhat different combination of zones together with a proposed rezone of specific properties (see Exhibit 5). This was the subject of an earlier Planning Board public hearing (see Exhibit 6 for Planning Board minutes and Exhibit 7 for comment letters). As a result of the earlier public hearing, the applicants elected to modify their proposal and withdraw the specific rezone request. The result was the proposal heard at the December 13, 2006, Planning Board meeting. The applicants have held a number of neighborhood meetings over a period of months to explain their proposals and elicit feedback. Some support was apparently generated, although there is still opposition to their current request. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1: 12/13/2006 Staff Report Link: Exhibit 2: Planning Board minutes 12/13/2006 Link: Exhibit 3: Applicant Response & Presentation Link: Exhibit 4: Comment Letters Link: Exhibit 5: Previous Applicant Proposal Link: Exhibit 6: Planning Board Minutes 9/27/2006 Link: Exhibit 7: Comment Letters on Previous Proposal Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/12/2007 11:40 AM APRV 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/12/2007 11:40 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/12/2007 12:47 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 01:49 PM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 01/11/2007 03:11 PM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 1 Rezone Districts Edmonds Way 16.30 RM-EW: Multiple Residential 16.50 BC-EW: Community Business Comprehensive Plan Goals F. Goals for the Edmonds Way Corridor... A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities. F.1. Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. F.2. Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. 2 F.3. Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. F.4. Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped-down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible. Comp Plan Map 3 Edmonds Way Corridor 4 5 6 7 6. The maximum base height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way may be increased to 30 feet if the following apply to the site and proposed development: (a) At least 50% of the parking for the subject building shall be enclosed inside a building or buildings; (b) The subject property is a least 5 feet lower at its lowest elevation than any adjacent residential property measured at its lowest elevation; and (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. RM-EW Zone highlights: 7. In addition to any height bonus under note 6, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the roof above the height limit, (after adding the height bonus under Note 6), provide a minimum 15% slope or pitch. 8 9 6 The maximum base height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way may be increased to 30 feet if the following apply to the site and proposed development: (a) At least 50% of the parking for the subject building shall be enclosed inside a building or buildings; (b) The subject property is a least 5 feet lower at its lowest elevation than any adjacent residential property measured at its lowest elevation; and (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. BC-EW Zone highlights: 7. In addition to any height bonus under note 6, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the roof above the height limit, (after adding the height bonus under Note 6), provide a minimum 15% slope or pitch. 10 AM-803 7. Report on City Council Committee Meetings Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:01/16/2007 Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:15 Minutes Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Report on City Council Committee Meetings. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Not applicable. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative Copies of the following City Council Committee Meeting Minutes are attached: 1. Community/Development Services Committee Meeting (1/9/07) 2. Finance Committee Meeting (1/9/07) Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: CSDS Committee Minutes Link: Finance Committee Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/11/2007 05:27 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/12/2007 09:45 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 01/12/2007 09:52 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 01/11/2007 03:44 PM Final Approval Date: 01/12/2007 M I N U T E S Community Services/Development Services Committee Meeting January 9, 2007 Elected Officials Present: Staff Present: Mauri Moore, Committee Member Duane Bowman, Dev. Services Director Richard Marin, Committee Chair Dave Gebert, City Engineer Noel Miller, Public Works Director Frances Chapin Committee Chair Marin convened the meeting at 6:00 P.M. After an official coin toss, Mr. Marin was elected Committee Chair for 2007. A. Report on Main Street Lighting Cost Estimates Noel Miller, Public Works Director introduced the topic. He reported that during the 2007-2008 budget process last year, the City Council appropriated $75,000 for the Main Street lighting project from 5th Avenue to 6th Avenue. He noted that his original estimate of $75,000 did not include any major sidewalk. Once engineering staff developed the project plan, it was discovered that it would also require a significant amount of new sidewalk to be constructed. The estimated cost was revised up to $242,000. Staff further discovered additional funds would be needed to remove the the street trees and stumps that are planned to be replaced which now has resulted in a total project cost of approximately $275,000. Dave Gebert, City Engineer, pointed out that the side walk replacement would cover only the area were the street lights were to be installed. Duane Bowman, Development Services Director, noted that $75,000 has been transferred to Fund 112 for this project but because of the cost increase to the project, staff recommends the project be postponed to allow staff and the City Council to find funding for the project. He noted that this is a low priority transportation project in comparison to a project like providing secondary emergency access out of Shell Valley. Councilmember Moore inquired whether or not grants would be available for this project. Dave Gebert responded that it would be very unlikely that this would be a good grant candidate project but staff could certainly look into the possibility. Ms. Moore also asked if this would be a good project for a Business Improvement District (BID) to fund. Duane Bowman responded that yes a BID could do this kind of project or a Limited Improvement District (LID) could also but was likely to receive little support. The Committee supported postponing the project to allow staff and the Council to explore other funding possibilities. The $75,000 in Fund 112 should be held in reserve for future funding of this project. ACTION: Postpone the Main Street lighting project this year to allow staff and the City Council time to research other funding options and that the $75,000 in Fund 112 is held in reserve for the project. The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m. FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES January 9, 2007 6:00 PM V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\2007 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES\FINANCE - 070109.DOC Present: Councilmember Ron Wambolt Councilmember Dave Orvis Staff: Kathleen Junglov Deb Sharp Noel Miller Dan Clements The Finance Committee meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM. After passing the baton back and fourth several times, it was decided that Councilmember Orvis will chair the committee. Item A: General Obligation Bond Issue Committee members were provided a background briefing about the upcoming $5.1 million bond issue. Of special interest was the 2007 Energy Conservation Project, which has not been previously approved by Council, and the calendar for issuing the debt. It was the Committee’s consensus to: 1.) Include the Energy Conservation Project; and 2.) Forward the ordinance on to Council for their review as a Consent Agenda item. Item B: Utility Code Update Kathleen Junglov reviewed the draft ordinance that codifies the utility billing changes discussed at an earlier Finance Committee meeting. The major changes include: 1.) Suspension of billing for vacant dwellings; 2.) Low income definition; and 3.) Delinquency charges. The Committee directed staff to move this item forward as a regular agenda topic. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 PM.