The URL can be used to link to this page

2007.02.20 CC Agenda PacketAGENDA Edmonds City Council Meeting Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds February 20, 2007 6:45 p.m. - Executive Session Regarding a Real Estate Matter 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Consent Agenda Items A. Roll Call B. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2007. C. Approval of claims checks #93978 through #94206 for February 8, 2007 in the amount of $578,468.54 and #94207 through #94365 for February 15, 2007 in the amount of $541,563.29. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44468 through #44504 for the period of January 16 through January 31, 2007 in the amount of $789,517.19. D. Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Lee and Pam McAllister ($1,000.00), Gregg Production Associates ($163,000.00 and continuing), and Dianne Roth Lauer ($3,998.00). E. Ratification of employment offer to Stormwater Engineering Program Manager. F. Appropriation of $11,000 and authorization for Mayor to sign contract change order No. 2 for the 92nd Avenue West/234th Street SW Intersection Safety Improvements project. G. Authorization for Mayor to sign interlocal agreement for Lake Ballinger Lake Level Study and to advertise for statements of qualification from consultants for the study. H. Approval of 2007 Taxicab Operator's License for Low Fare Airport and Local For Hire Vehicle. I. Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services. J. Agreement for Legal Services between City of Edmonds and Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.L.L.C. K. Approval of 2007 Addendum to Prisoner Detention Agreement with City of Lynnwood L. Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Bothell and the City of Edmonds, in conjunction with N.C. Machinery for the purchase of one (1) new Backhoe in the amount of $98,272.63, including tax. M. Proposed Resolution supporting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Joint Select Committee on Public Health Financing. N. Proposed Ordinance creating two new zones for the Edmonds Way Corridor. O. Proposed Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code Sections 17.50.040(B); 17.50.070(B); 17.75.010; 17.75.020; 20.50.040(B); 20.50.050(C); 20.50.060(C); 20.60.005; 20.60.025; 20.60.030; 20.60.035; 20.60.045 (B); and 20.60.080 in order to provide for the creation of the BD Zone in other provisions of the Code now referencing the BC or Central Business Zone. 3• (5 Min) Recognition of "Excellence Award" for safe food handling received by Arby's Restaurant. AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 1 of 313 4. (15 Municipal Code Title 7 Utility Billing Update. Min) 5. (45 Public Hearing on proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds City Code Section 5.05.050 Min) prohibiting animals from running at large, requiring humane treatment and notification of detained animals. 6. Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 7. (15 Report on City Council Committee Meetings Min) g. (5 Min) Mayor's Comments 9. (15 Min) Council Comments 10. Adjourn AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 2 of 313 AM-843 Approve City Council Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 6, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the February 6, 2007 Draft City Council Minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Link: Draft Minutes Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 01:58 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/13/2007 02:12 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 02:26 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 02/13/2007 01:56 PM Final Approval Date: 02/13/2007 2.13. Packet Page 3 of 313 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES February 6, 2007 Following a Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding a legal matter and to meet with Sister City Candidates at 6:45 p.m., the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Michael Plunkett, Councilmember 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT David Stern, Chief of Police Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dave Gebert, City Engineer Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Council President Olson requested Item E be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, FOR APPROVAL OF THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 23, 2007. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #93712 THROUGH #93977 FOR FEBRUARY 1, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $835,169.15. D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM DIANE VAN NATTER (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED). F. ORDINANCE NO.3626 AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 10.20.010(B) AND 10.20.020 TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP (C) TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE RULES GOVERNING THE APPOINTMENT AND SERVICE OF COMMISSIONERS ON EDMONDS CIVIC ARTS COMMISSION. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 1 Packet Page 4 of 313 G. AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO COMMENCE A QUIET TITLE ACTION IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TO QUIET EDMOND'S TITLE TO THE PORTIONS OF PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY RECEIVED BY THE CITY FROM THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 BY QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE INTERURBAN TRAIL PROJECT WITHIN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. H. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ANNUAL REPORT. ITEM E: CONFIRMATION OF SISTER CITY COMMISSION CANDIDATES CLARE LONG AND ELIJAH ZUPANCIC. Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh, liaison to the Sister City Commission, introduced Sister City Commission Chair Jeanne Mazzoni. Ms. Mazzoni introduced the two new Commissioners, Clare Long and Elijah Zupancic, and described their backgrounds. Ms. Mazzoni also introduced Sister City Commissioners Jim Corbin and Iyoko Okano in the audience. Mayor Haakenson thanked the Commissioners for volunteering. 3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF THE GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK, FEBRUARY 4-10, 2007. Mayor Haakenson read a Proclamation declaring February 4 — 10, 2007 as Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Week and presented the proclamation to Police Chief David Stern, Chamber President. Chief Stern recognized Chamber members Wayne Purser, Chris Fleck, Dave Arista, Strom Peterson and Ron Clybome who were also present. He also introduced the Chamber's Executive Director Jan Vance and staff member Carolyn LaFave who distributed centennial pins to the Council. Chief Stern explained the pin was commissioned for the 100th anniversary of the Chamber. The Chamber, originally the Board of Trade, began in 1904 and was officially recognized as a Chamber of Commerce on February 6, 1907. He provided highlights of the Chamber's history, remarking from the beginning the Chamber had been a community -oriented organization. In 1907 the Chamber purchased several large parcels of waterfront acreage to induce industry to move to the City. Sales of that parcel and others were used to purchase a 10-acre site for use as a park, known today as City Park. It was also the site of the first 4th of July function in 1907. During the first few years, the Chamber also assisted with transportation in the City; the Chamber paid $400 to secure a railroad spur on Chamber -owned property which resulted in a railroad depot at the intersection of Railroad and James in 1909. In the early 1920s the Chamber worked with the City to obtain an easement for a ferry dock; construction of the dock cost approximately $9,250 and opened on May 16, 1923 with a 12-car, 56-foot boat called the City of Edmonds. In 1960 the Chamber elected Peggy Harris as one of the first women Chamber presidents in the United States. He invited the public to learn more about the history of the Chamber at their 100-year banquet. 4. DISCUSSION ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION ON THE DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES. Planning Manager Rob Chave described the history of this issue, explaining in 1993 the court case Anderson v. Issaquah highlighted the need for predicable design standards and a process to be followed. Since the court decision in that case addressed an ordinance essentially copied from Edmonds' ordinance, it was felt necessary to make some revisions to the City's ordinance. In 1999 the City Council Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 5 of 313 commissioned a study by Cedar River Associates who addressed the general design guidelines and design process. Their conclusions emphasized the need for design guidelines that were specific enough that developers knew what was expected and a process where design review occurred at the beginning rather than the end to allow influence of the design rather than reacting to a design that was presented. The Council then hired Cascade Design in 2000 to develop design guidelines that could be used by the City. The design guidelines they developed were reviewed by the Planning Board and a recommendation forwarded to the City Council. The Council reviewed the design guidelines in 2002 at which point there was a divergence of opinion; several members of the design community/developers were concerned the proposed design guidelines were too specific and would impinge on design flexibility. The specific design guidelines were then tabled and a portion adopted as part of the update to the sign code in 2003. The remainder of the design guidelines has been on hiatus since then. In 2005 some of the design objectives from the design guidelines developed by Cascade Design were incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. These include the design objectives in the general design element of the Comprehensive Plan that apply citywide; a second set, more tailored to the downtown area were incorporated into the Downtown Plan. He advised most of the design guidelines were fairly generic, providing some guidance for design review and potentially developing specific regulations. Following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, there was additional discussion by the Council with an urban design professional Mark Hinshaw whose focus was downtown. Mr. Hinshaw cited the importance of streamlining design review, focusing on what was important, believing that specific guidelines were difficult to draft and could hamper the design process. Mr. Chave noted the exception would be for a very specific theme such as Leavenworth which the Council did not feel was appropriate for Edmonds. Beginning in early 2006 the Council had additional discussion on design guidelines and the design review process. The ADB developed a set of design guidelines for use at the beginning of the process; these guidelines were advisory, less specific with general guidance. After the Council reviewed the design guidelines developed by the ADB, it was agreed they would be best in an upfront, advisory process with the ADB engaging in discussion with an applicant. It was also acknowledged at that time that specific, mandatory standards should be included in the code. In 2006 the Council forwarded the design review process to the Planning Board. The Planning Board spent six months in review and has now forwarded a recommendation to the Council. He noted during this same period, new General Commercial (CG) zones for Hwy. 99 were developed that included design guidance. Those zones were intended to have the new process apply because design guidance had been incorporated into the code which combined with the new design guidelines process upfront with the ADB should enable due process to be applied. The Council also adopted new downtown zoning (BD zones) that have very specific standards for height, bulk, design features, etc. He commented on the development of another set of guidelines by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). He advised the HPC planned to make a presentation on specific guidelines for the retail core to Council Committee next week followed by a presentation to the full Council in the future. He advised as design standards were developed area by area or zone -by -zone, the new process would supersede the old process until the old process no longer existed. Mr. Chave displayed a flowchart and described the old process which he noted was back -end loaded. The design review process did not begin until an application was submitted to the City because the process of design review required the applicant to prepare a significant level of detail. By the time an application was submitted, the developer has invested a great deal of time, effort and money into their design. He noted there were optional design review opportunities that some developers took advantage of but some did not. Thus the design review process occurred after the application was submitted and the appeal occurred at the end of the process, just prior to the applicant applying for a building permit. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 6 of 313 Under the new process proposed by the Planning Board, Mr. Chave explained the design review process occurred almost entirely at the front of the process. The application to the City with the detailed design occurred after all design issues were resolved, creating a very streamlined process once the design issues had been addressed. The process recommended by the Planning Board was a two-phase public hearing, the first phase would be identifying critical issues the project needed to address; that phase would be advertised with notice to property owners within 300 feet. The applicant would then attempt to address those issues during further development of their design. He emphasized this would occur much earlier than the current process. Under the current process, by the time the applicant approached the City, they had a good idea of the design for the site. The intent of the proposed process was to engage the developer much earlier to identify issues of importance to their project. After the applicant had refined their design, they would come back to the ADB for the second phase of the hearing. At this point their design was still conceptual but with more specifics. At this second phase of the hearing, the ADB would impose conditions they want included in design that would ultimately result in a building permit. Any appeals would occur after the second phase of the hearing. Once all the design issues were resolved, the applicant would develop detailed design for a building permit. At that point staff would ensure the permit submissions were consistent with the ADB's decision. Mr. Chave summarized the Planning Board's recommendation retained the existing design process for most areas of the City but has a new design process that would be applied area -by -area as design guidelines/design standards were developed. The first two areas where the new process would apply were the CG zones on Hwy. 99 and the BD zones in downtown. The design review guidelines also formalize the landscape requirements. Councilmember Orvis asked how the design standards being developed by the HPC would fit into this process. Mr. Chave advised he was the staff person for the HPC, because the guidelines they were developing were very specific, he recommended they be incorporated into the code in the BD zone. Councilmember Orvis asked what an appeal would look like. Mr. Chave answered it would be on the ADB's decision and whatever conditions they imposed on the project. Councilmember Orvis asked how the ADB choosing standards was not in opposition to Anderson v. Issaquah. City Attorney Scott Snyder answered the design guidelines and the checklist were a very extensive list. Because every neighborhood was unique, some factors would not apply to every area. The intent was to tailor the checklist before the application was complete so that the developer knew precisely what issues their design needed to address. Staff s decision was then appealable in the same manner as a building permit via Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) to Superior Court. Councilmember Orvis posed an example, if the ADB identified an issue as a high priority and the applicant believed it was a lower priority, how would such an appeal be resolved. Mr. Snyder answered the Comprehensive Plan, design standards for the zone in concurrence with the general zoning process would be used. He explained one of the primary goals was to give citizens more influence at a stage before the developer had spent a great deal of money and were more likely to listen to the neighborhood's concerns. He emphasized this would require citizens to get involved early in the process because once the specific design was approved, it would be difficult to challenge. Councilmember Marin was pleased with the proposed design guidelines; however, he suggested staff add to the first bullet regarding screening of dumpsters something like "and provide reasonable access for the utility providing service" to ensure the dumpsters were screened as well as accessible. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 7 of 313 Councilmember Wambolt asked whether the renovation of Old Milltown would have been reviewed by the ADB or reviewed by staff if this new process had been in effect at the time the project was proposed. Mr. Chave explained under this process, only major projects had the upfront review by the ADB; minor projects that did not exceed the SEPA threshold would not. He explained the reason was if the intent was to apply specific standards to a project such as Old Milltown, the best way was to include those standards in the code. If design relied on a subjective public hearing, there was the danger of the public thinking a decision could be made on something that was outside the code. If the Council felt the standards developed by the HPC were important for buildings to acknowledge and respond to, they needed to be incorporated into the code. He cautioned against subjecting a minor project to a process with no hope of changing the design. Council President Olson advised the HPC would be making a presentation to the Council at the February 27 meeting. She noted it may be a more informal joint discussion around a table. Mr. Snyder agreed with Mr. Chave if the Council wanted an issue addressed, it should be included in the code. Another option would be, in neighborhoods or zone districts that the Council felt were very sensitive, to review everything in that neighborhood or zone. Mr. Chave cautioned reviewing everything assumed there could be an impact on what occurred. Councilmember Dawson suggested the Council may want to consider involving the public for projects in certain zones such as BD 1 even if they could not force a change; some developers may be interested in working with the public and seeking their input. She asked about the timing of the HPC's presentation to the Council and the public hearing on the design guidelines. Mr. Chave advised the Council could have a public hearing on the HPC's recommendations but if their recommendation was to include standards in the code, it would require review by the Planning Board. Mr. Snyder stated the old process would remain in place while neighborhoods developed specific design guidelines. The new process would not affect a neighborhood until specific guidelines were in place. Councilmember Dawson asked for clarification regarding the provision for exempt developments that required structures or sites on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places have a certificate of appropriateness from the Edmonds HPC. Mr. Chave answered for a site on the City's Register of Historic Places, any building permit would require a certificate from the HPC before approval by the City. Councilmember Dawson questioned whether such a structure or site should be exempt from this process or go through both processes. Mr. Chave anticipated the HPC's standards would be specific. He cautioned that because the City's register was voluntary, buildings could be withdrawn from the register. If a building withdrew from the register they would no longer be exempt and would be subject to the design review process. Councilmember Dawson asked whether the proposed design guidelines were clear enough with regard to a structure withdrawn from the register. Mr. Snyder suggested adding a sentence that a project would lose its vesting if withdrawn from the Historic Register. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 6, 2007. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS WASHINGTON, RECOMMENDING TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL THAT AN EMERGENCY MORATORIUM BE ENACTED ON APPLICATIONS FOR CONDOMINIUM - RELATED, LOW -DENSITY, MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNINCORPORATED PORTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS MUNICIPAL URBAN GROWTH AREA. Council President Olson explained the South Snohomish Cities had been discussing Low Density, Multiple Family Residential (LDMR) Developments for several months. She explained when Snohomish Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 8 of 313 County adopted the code, it was intended to be for condominiums and apartments, however, developers had been building air space condominiums in this zone. Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained LDMR developments were occurring in the Esperance area, an area completely surrounded by the City of Edmonds. Snohomish County's designation for that area was 6-12 dwelling units per acre; the area was primarily zoned RR-8400 with pockets of commercial along Hwy. 99 and multi family along SR 104. Snohomish County's Comprehensive Plan designation of the Esperance area allowed parcels to be rezoned to LDMR. He cited an example of an 8-dwelling unit LDMR on 2201h and displayed several photographs of the development. Access to the development was via a narrow roadway; the lot sizes were approximately 8600 square feet. If this development were in Edmonds and zoned RS-8, four dwelling units would be allowed. He noted the average cost of the houses was approximately $325,000. He observed the houses in LDMR were packed in, often with little or no landscaping. Mr. Bowman explained there had been a great deal of discussion at Snohomish County regarding LDMRs. He noted some LDMRs that had been approved were not very attractive and had issues with fire access, parking, lack of open space, etc. Some cities had been working with Snohomish County to develop design standards for LDMRS. He noted the LDMRs would continue to be constructed in the Esperance area due to the Comprehensive Plan designation; there were currently three pending projects. He pointed out eventually the Esperance area would annex to Edmonds and these developments did not adhere to the City's development standards. The resolution requests the Snohomish County Council impose a moratorium to study the issue and develop design standards. Mayor Haakenson summarized Snohomish County was allowing more density than Edmonds' code would allow. Mr. Bowman agreed. Council President Olson pointed out many LDMRs had drive aisles instead of streets, leaving no place for residents and/or visitors to park and cars parked on the street impacted emergency vehicle access. She explained the Snohomish County Executive was working on new guidelines but LDMRs continue to be permitted in areas the County wants cities to annex. She noted if the standards in these developments were not up to the cities' standards, the cities did not want to annex those areas. There was also concern that these areas would become rundown in the future as residents may not be aware they were required to maintain the drive aisles. Councilmember Marin recalled the Snohomish County Tomorrow Steering Committee discussed LDMRs several months ago and directed County staff to begin a rewrite to impose more strict conditions. County staff responded but it was soon realized the necessary revisions to the code could take two years. In the meantime LDMRs continue to be built in annexation areas. Approximately three months ago after additional discussion regarding LDMRs, Snohomish County Tomorrow unanimously supported sending a letter to Snohomish County requesting a moratorium. However to date Snohomish County Council still has not taken any action with regard to a moratorium. The resolution was an attempt to bring the urgency of the issue to the County Council's attention. He pointed out there were six LDMRs in the Esperance area and three applications were pending. Councilmember Moore agreed this was a critical resolution for the Council to pass. She met with Snohomish County Council Chairman Dave Gossett recently and he planned to bring the issue of a moratorium for a vote soon. She expressed concern with the potential fire hazards, commenting when these areas were annexed, the cities would bear the burden of providing fire protection to those developments. She expressed her support for the resolution. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 6 Packet Page 9 of 313 COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1140. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The resolution approved reads as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RECOMMENDING TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL THAT AN EMERGENCY MORATORIUM BE ENACTED ON APPLICATIONS FOR CONDOMINIUM RELATED LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNINCORPORATED PORTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS MUNICIPAL URBAN GROWTH AREA. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Item F on the Consent Calendar that imposed a limit of two consecutive terms for Art Commissioners. He questioned why only Art Commissioners were limited to two terms and suggested the Council establish a limit of two consecutive terms for the ADB, Planning Board and other Boards and Commissions. He cited the importance of turnover on Boards and Commissions. 7. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS No report. 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson had no report. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Olson thanked the Planning Board for the excellent job they did on the design guidelines. Councilmember Wambolt suggested adding the topic of Boards/Commissions term limits to the Council's retreat agenda. He noted the current turnover on Boards and Commissions seemed to make it unnecessary and he was not aware of any member who had served more than two consecutive terms. Councilmember Marin reported he made a motion at last week's Sound Transit Finance Committee to take the interim station in Edmonds to the next level of design. He also reported the Health District hired a new Health Officer. Councilmember Dawson reported she met the new Health Officer and was very impressed. Councilmember Dawson explained the Mayor appointed new Board and Commission members and the Council confirmed his appointments. She suggested discussing at the retreat a more active role for the Council in the appointment of new Board and Commission members to allow the Council a role in interviewing and selecting candidates. She noted at the County, some members were appointed by the Executive and others by the County Council. Mayor Haakenson offered to have staff provide a report on Board and Commission terms at the retreat. Councilmember Orvis reported Councilmember Marin, Mayor Haakenson, several staff members and he interviewed Hearing Examiner candidates last week and made a recommendation. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 7 Packet Page 10 of 313 Councilmember Moore asked Council President Olson to fill in for her at the Council Committee meeting next week as she would be in Washington DC February 8 — 14 to attend the Community College's national legislative summit. This year's focus was on better student loans for community college students. Next she offered to provide Councilmembers a copy of an article from the Puget Sound Business Journal regarding urban villages. She agreed with Councilmember Dawson's suggestion to discuss the Council's role in appointing Board and Commission members, suggesting the Council also request Boards and Commissions submit regular reports. Councilmember Moore relayed she had encountered a woman this morning who picks up trash during her daily walk, observing this was an example of someone who was quietly in her own way doing what she could for her community. 10. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 6, 2007 Page 8 Packet Page 11 of 313 AM-848 Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting 2.C. Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Debbie Karber, Administrative Services Submitted For: Dan Clements Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subiect Title Approval of claims checks #93978 through #94206 for February 8, 2007 in the amount of $578,468.54 and #94207 through #94365 for February 15, 2007 in the amount of $541,563.29. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44468 through #44504 for the period of January 16 through January 31, 2007 in the amount of $789,517.19. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2007 Revenue: Expenditure: $1,909,549.02 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $1,120,031.83 Payroll: $ 789,517.19 Attachments Link: Claim Cks 2-8-07 Link: Claim Cks 2-15-07 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Kathleen 3unglov 02/15/2007 01:26 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 01:40 PM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 02:02 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 02/15/2007 11:51 AM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 12 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93978 2/2/2007 066823 CARL, LINDA 01-16-07/01-31-07 REPLACEMENT CHECK FOR ALL C Check made payable to All City CU it 811.000.000.111.100.000.00 260.00 Total : 260.00 93979 2/6/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS January 2007 DRS CONTRIBUTIONS FOR JANUA January 2007 DRS Contributions les; 811.000.000.231.540.000.00 168,816.67 Total : 168,816.67 93980 2/8/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 236810 RODENT CONTROL CITY WIDE RODENT CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 67.50 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 6.01 Total : 73.51 93981 2/8/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070131 INV#1201641-20070131 EDMONDS SEARCHES FOR JANUARY 2007 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 21.55 Total : 21.55 93982 2/8/2007 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 07-003 JANITORIAL SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00 Total : 334.00 93983 2/8/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 110424681 BATTERY INVENTORY - 3 BATTERI BATTERY INVENTORY - 3 BATTERI 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 269.05 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 23.95 Total : 293.00 93984 2/8/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 701940 UNIT 235 - MINI LAMPS Page: 1 Packet Page 13 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93984 2/8/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE (Continued) UNIT 235 - MINI LAMPS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 54.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.81 702651 UNIT 115 - BATTERIES, HALOGEN UNIT 115 - BATTERIES, HALOGEN 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.44 702770 UNIT K93 UNIT K93 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 14.08 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1.25 702793 UNIT 485 - HEADLAMPS UNIT 485 - HEADLAMPS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.80 702867 UNIT K93 - BATTERY CABLE, WIRE UNIT K93 - BATTERY CABLE, WIRE 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 148.91 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 13.25 702899 UNIT 80 - PLUGS UNIT 80 - PLUGS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.06 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.14 703277 SHOP SUPPLIES - WIRE SHOP SUPPLIES - WIRE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.98 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.60 Page: 2 Packet Page 14 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93984 2/8/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE (Continued) 880990 UNIT 238- BATTERY UNIT 238- BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 142.15 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.65 Total : 501.02 93985 2/8/2007 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 6155 ENGRAVED PLATES ENGRAVED PLATES 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 35.00 Freight 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 4.90 Sales Tax 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 3.51 Total : 43.41 93986 2/8/2007 071491 ANDERSON SPECIALTIES LLC 5663 CITY HALL - LADDER CITY HALL - LADDER 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 255.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.44 Total : 277.44 93987 2/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3809065 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 35.46 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.16 Total : 38.62 93988 2/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3799372 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 87.33 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.77 Page: 3 Packet Page 15 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93988 2/8/2007 069751 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) Total: 95.10 93989 2/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3797983 FLEET UNIFORM SVC— FLEET UNIFORM SVC- 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 43.90 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 3.91 512-3797984 PW MATS SVC PW MATS SVC 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS SVC 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS SVC 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS SVC 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS SVC 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS SVC 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 11.75 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 1.03 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Page: 4 Packet Page 16 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 93989 2/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3797985 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3799371 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 512-3802770 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 18.02 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.60 Page: 5 Packet Page 17 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 93989 2/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3802771 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 11.75 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 1.03 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Page: 6 Packet Page 18 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 93989 2/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3802772 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3805182 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 512-3807373 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 512-3807375 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3809066 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 Total : 303.33 Page: 7 Packet Page 19 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher front Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93990 2/8/2007 068379 ARCHITECREATION INC MSC-07-0051 WHEEL STOPS PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STC 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,120.00 Freight 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 225.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 118.36 Total : 1,463.36 93991 2/8/2007 001670 ASSOCIATED GLASS 1062652 CITY HALL - REPLACED BROKEN E CITY HALL - REPLACED BROKEN E 116.000.651.519.920.480.00 406.97 Sales Tax 116.000.651.519.920.480.00 36.22 Total : 443.19 93992 2/8/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 553208 FLEET - DIESEL 226.6 GAL FLEET - DIESEL 226.6 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 534.97 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 93.80 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 Page: 8 Packet Page 20 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 93992 2/8/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 553393 FLEET - BIODIESEL 800 GAL FLEET - BIODIESEL 800 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 1,828.16 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 287.36 DIESEL - 3200 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 6,308.48 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1,143.04 PLUS UNLEADED - 3502 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 7,377.67 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 1,254.41 UNLEADED - 1999 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 4,033.18 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 714.05 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 10.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 10.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 10.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 10.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 148.26 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 0.81 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 0.81 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 0.80 Page: 9 Packet Page 21 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 93992 2/8/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 553494 DIESEL - 63.9 GAL DIESEL - 63.9 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 123.42 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 22.82 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 553796 DIESEL - 172 GAL DIESEL - 172 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 310.25 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 61.27 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 554099 FLEET - DIESEL 80 GAL FLEET - DIESEL 80 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 139.40 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 ST EXCISE REGUALR TAX, WA OIL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 28.45 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 Total : 24,710.61 00088816 WATER QUALITY - CV RUBBER Kll WATER QUALITY - CV RUBBER Kll 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 69.76 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.98 Page: 10 Packet Page 22 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher front Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93993 2/8/2007 069451 069451 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES (Continued) Total : 74.74 93994 2/8/2007 064343 AT&T 730386050200 425-744-6057 PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Fax Line 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 1.94 Public Works Fax Line 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 7.38 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 7.38 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 7.38 Public Works Fax Line 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 7.38 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 7.38 Total : 38.84 93995 2/8/2007 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 030194 alerton system-PW alerton system-PW 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,541.25 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 137.17 Total : 1,678.42 93996 2/8/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 39048 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS Page: 11 Packet Page 23 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 93996 2/8/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) UB Outsourcing area #600 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 30.78 UB Outsourcing area #600 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 30.78 UB Outsourcing area #600 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 30.87 UB Outsourcing area #600 POSTAGI 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 89.70 UB Outsourcing area #600 POSTAGI 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 89.69 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.71 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.71 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.71 39148 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #300 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 149.32 UB Outsourcing area #300 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.32 UB Outsourcing area #300 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 149.76 UB Outsourcing area #300 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 417.79 UB Outsourcing area #300 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 417.78 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 13.02 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 13.02 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 13.42 Total : 1,603.38 Page: 12 Packet Page 24 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 93997 2/8/2007 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 06-2579/2655 BURIAL SUPPLIES BURIAL SUPPLIES: VANDER SYS 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 BURIAL SUPPLIES: TERRY 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 523.00 2196 BURIAL SUPPLIES BURIAL SUPPLIES: CARRETTA 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 353.00 Total : 1,234.00 93998 2/8/2007 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0107 Background checks Background checks 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 85.00 Total : 85.00 93999 2/8/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9406339 COPIER RENTAL COPIER RENTAL 001.000.230.512.501.450.00 307.10 Total : 307.10 94000 2/8/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9406340 Canon 5870 Copier - 3/1 - 3/31/07 Page: 13 Packet Page 25 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94000 2/8/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING (Continued) Canon 5870 Copier - 3/1 - 3/31/07 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.32 Canon 5870 Copier - 3/1 - 3/31/07 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.35 Canon 5870 Copier - 3/1 - 3/31/07 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33 Supply charge 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.00 Supply charge 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.01 Supply charge 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.25 Total : 412.75 94001 2/8/2007 071500 BARRY, JAMES 2-29225 RE: #9018-001 UTILITY REFUND RE: #9018-001 Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 130.96 Total : 130.96 94002 2/8/2007 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS 581 ESGA.L/S 2 & 13 thru 01/19/07 ESGA.L/S 2 & 13 thru 01/19/07 412.300.630.594.320.650.00 160.00 Total : 160.00 94003 2/8/2007 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 336613 FLEET INVENTORY - BRAKE KITS FLEET INVENTORY - BRAKE KITS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 204.18 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.97 Page: 14 Packet Page 26 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94003 2/8/2007 028050 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 94004 2/8/2007 071421 BIO CLEAN INC 94005 94006 2/8/2007 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC Invoice (Continued) 2047 184 2/8/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 551282-01 556141 PO # Description/Account Amount Total : 222.15 UNIT 239 - DECONTMINATION OF I UNIT 239 - DECONTMINATION OF 1 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 275.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 24.48 Total : 299.48 PermitTrax Training PermitTrax Training 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 285.00 Total : 285.00 INV#551282-01 EDMONDS PD - MIL LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 94.95 SEW EMBLEMS ON SHIRT - CREDI 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.00 SERVICE STRIPES 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.55 SEW BUTTONS ON SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.55 INV#556141 EDMONDS PD - SWAT BDU SHIRTS - DREYER/MCINTYRE 001.000.410.521.230.240.00 59.90 CLOTH NAMETAGS & SEWING 001.000.410.521.230.240.00 15.90 SEW EMBLEMS ON GARMENTS - C 001.000.410.521.230.240.00 8.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.230.240.00 12.65 BDU PANTS - DREYER/MCINTYRE 001.000.410.521.230.240.00 59.90 Page: 15 Packet Page 27 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94006 2/8/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 558221-03 INV#558221-03 EDMONDS PD - FOI ACADEMY SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 17.95 SEW EMBLEM ON GARMENT - CRE 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.00 MILITARY CREASES IN ACADEMY 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 10.00 BASEBALL CAP W/EMBROIDERY 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 19.95 NAMETAGS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 18.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 6.15 560586-80 CREDIT MEMO 560586-80 EDMONC S CREDIT FOR SEWING CHEVRONS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -7.50 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -0.66 560600 INV#560600 EDMONDS PD - YAMAI NAMETAG FOR YAMANE 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.79 561179 INV#561179 EDMONDS PD - MCINT UNIFORM TROUSERS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 106.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.41 562824 INV#562824 EDMONDS PD - PAULE BDU PANTS FOR PAULSON 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 29.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 2.64 Total : 501.03 Page: 16 Packet Page 28 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94007 2/8/2007 065341 BRIANS UPHOLSTERY 333692 INV#333692 EDMONDS PD - K-93 VINYL & FOAM TO RECOVER SEAL 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 179.50 LABOR TO RECOVER K-93 SEATS 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 990.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 99.40 Total : 1,268.90 94008 2/8/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1446982 130598 C-251 ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMEW 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 2,598.97 Total : 2,598.97 94009 2/8/2007 067594 BROWN, MICHAEL BOOTS 2007 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE FOR M B 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE FOR M B 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 164.00 Total : 164.00 94010 2/8/2007 063459 BYRNE SPECIALTY GASES INC 284204 00674 CAL GAS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 294.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 27.41 Total : 338.91 94011 2/8/2007 065309 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY 0203206-IN INV#0203206-IN CUST#0098020 ED PET WAGGIN CAT CARRIERS 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 97.50 Freight 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 12.27 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 7.70 Total : 117.47 Page: 17 Packet Page 29 of 313 vchlist 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 18 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94012 2/8/2007 003255 CANINE COLLEGE CANINECOLLEGE7569 DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES DOG OBEDIENCE #7569 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 320.00 Total : 320.00 94013 2/8/2007 003330 CASCADE TROPHY 25999 ADMIN MISC plaque engraving 001.000.510.522.100.490.00 9.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.490.00 0.80 Total : 9.80 94014 2/8/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN01071008 GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES HELIUM TANK RENTAL FOR GYMN 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 7.50 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.67 Total : 8.17 94015 2/8/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 102831 WATER DEPT - 20 LB CARBON DIC WATER DEPT - 20 LB CARBON DIC 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 49.81 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.43 Total : 54.24 94016 2/8/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY103121 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 25.85 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.30 Page: 18 Packet Page 30 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94016 2/8/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) LY103138 ALS SUPPLIES Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 1.99 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 8.93 LY103139 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 44.65 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.17 LY103140 ALS SUPPLIES Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.79 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.86 RN01071007 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 15.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 1.34 Total : 166.38 94017 2/8/2007 071495 CHAPLIN, JOYCE CHAPLIN0203 RHYTHMIC JUDGE RHYTHMIC JUDGE FOR GYMNAST 001.000.640.575.550.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 94018 2/8/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT7654 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT Page: 19 Packet Page 31 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94018 2/8/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E (Continued) FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #7654 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 75.60 Total : 75.60 94019 2/8/2007 070029 CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & REGIONAL 510-2262 ALS MISC Sarchin Prac.Pediatrics fee 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 150.00 Total : 150.00 94020 2/8/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS X02042007 Cell Phone Service 12/28/06-1/27/07 Cell Phone Service 12/28/06-1/27/07 001.000.310.514.100.420.00 128.57 Total : 128.57 94021 2/8/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-369-4557 CELL PHONE FLEET cell phone fleet 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 9.67 Total : 9.67 94022 2/8/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 4X02032007 ALS COMMUNICATIONS IRIS 001.000.510.526.100.420.00 44.91 Total : 44.91 94023 2/8/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460551095 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460551096 UNIFORMS Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 98.13 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.74 Page: 20 Packet Page 32 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94023 2/8/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION (Continued) 460552158 UNIFORMS Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 105.43 Stn 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 105.44 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.39 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.38 460552181 UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 118.63 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.55 460556365 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460556366 UNIFORMS Stn 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 98.13 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.74 Total : 673.52 94024 2/8/2007 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FINANCIAL 8647192 COPIER LEASE PW copier lease for PW 001.000.650.519.910.450.00 256.31 Total : 256.31 94025 2/8/2007 070694 CITY OF KENT RI6319 TRAINING MISC Krugmire Insptr Academy 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 250.00 Page: 21 Packet Page 33 of 313 vchlist 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 22 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94025 2/8/2007 070694 070694 CITY OF KENT (Continued) Total : 250.00 94026 2/8/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 100093 1-218359-279832 2203 N 205TH ST 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 13.87 Total : 13.87 94027 2/8/2007 069838 CLARK, DAVID 510-2264 ALS PROF SERVICES eval 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 98.00 Total : 98.00 94028 2/8/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1738977 SUPPLIES LINERS, TOILET TISSUE, BLEACH, 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 226.62 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.94 E1738977-2 CLEANING SUPPLIES LINERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 855.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 75.24 Total : 1,176.80 94029 2/8/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1738649 FAC MAINT - KITCHEN ROLL TOW[ FAC MAINT - KITCHEN ROLL TOW[ 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1,074.62 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 94.79 Page: 22 Packet Page 34 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94029 2/8/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES (Continued) E1743185 FAC - ROLL TOWELS, CREVICE TC FAC - ROLL TOWELS, CREVICE TC 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 410.34 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.33 E1744629 PW - VERSAMATIC EXTENSION TL PW - VERSAMATIC EXTENSION TL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 61.08 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.60 Total : 1,690.26 94030 2/8/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1746344 OPS SUPPLIES stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 282.96 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 25.12 Total : 310.58 94031 2/8/2007 068077 CODES KNOWLEDGE COMPANY 443 PT. EDWARDS #9, 2006-1344. PT. EDWARDS #9, 2006-1344. 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 5,593.00 444 PT. EDWARDS #9, 2006-1342,1343 PT. EDWARDS #9, 2006-1342,1343 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,032.00 Total : 6,625.00 94032 2/8/2007 004377 COLE INDUSTRIAL INC 5212-0 FAC (2), MUSEUM, FS 17, YOST,CI' Page: 23 Packet Page 35 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94032 2/8/2007 004377 COLE INDUSTRIAL INC (Continued) FAC (2), MUSEUM, FS 17, YOST,CI' 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,020.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 90.78 Total : 1,110.78 94033 2/8/2007 071493 COLT DEFENSE LLC ANDERSON COLT AR-15/M16 ARMORER COUR D.ANDERSON/REG ISTRATI ON- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 400.00 Total : 400.00 94034 2/8/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0991 OPS UNIFORMS BCs 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 97.12 510-0995 PREV UNIFORMS FM 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 50.04 510-1524 PREV UNIFORMS Inspector 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 29.43 510-1539 OPS UNIFORMS Admin BC 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 73.87 510-1884 ADMIN UNIFORMS FC 001.000.510.522.100.240.00 35.31 510-2341 OPS UNIFORMS AC 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 38.26 Total : 324.03 94035 2/8/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING JANUARY 2007 JANUARY 2007 - EDMONDS PD DRYCLEANING/LAUNDRY FOR 01/l 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 770.10 Total : 770.10 Page: 24 Packet Page 36 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94036 2/8/2007 005810 CRAIN, DOUGLAS 24 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,470.34 Total : 1,470.34 94037 2/8/2007 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0107 2989771 5374044 INV#0107 2989771 5374044 EDMOI` 5 GALLON WATER BOTTLES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 74.90 HOT/COLD COOLER RENTAL 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.91 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.89 Total : 87.70 94038 2/8/2007 005965 CUES INC 261681 SEWER DEPT - SPROCKET, KEYS - SEWER DEPT - SPROCKET, KEYS- 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 58.70 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 33.33 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 8.20 Total : 100.23 94039 2/8/2007 063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 275398 CIVIC FIELD DRAINAGE IMPROVED SUPPLIES FOR CIVIC FIELD DRAY 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,933.90 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 164.38 Total : 2,098.28 94040 2/8/2007 071486 DAHLE NORTH AMERICA INC W0035384-IN INV#W0035384-IN CUST#GSAWA E WASTE CONTAINER BOXES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 30.00 Total : 30.00 Page: 25 Packet Page 37 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94041 2/8/2007 071267 DENNIS R CRAIG CONST INC ESAC.Pmt 1 E5AC.92nd/234th Intersection Pmt 1 E5AC.92nd/234th Intersection Pmt 1 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 47,781.44 Total : 47,781.44 94042 2/8/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2467 JAMES MOORS EXAM CERTF/MOORS 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 94043 2/8/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201565136 FAC MAINT - TISSUE, PAPER TOW FAC MAINT - TISSUE, PAPER TOW 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 264.24 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.20 Total : 286.44 94044 2/8/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2716 Nov & Dec 06 So Sno Cities Mtg Min, Nov & Dec 06 So Sno Cities Mtg Min, 001.000.000.237.910.000.00 260.40 Total : 260.40 94045 2/8/2007 006844 DMCJA 010107 JUDGE'S ASSOCIATION DUES JUDGE'S ASSOCIATION DUES 001.000.230.512.500.490.00 312.00 Total : 312.00 94046 2/8/2007 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 07-1094.1 E7FA.12th PI N/Maplewood Survey E7FA.12th PI N/Maplewood Survey 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 4,988.00 Total : 4,988.00 94047 2/8/2007 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02277973 CITY HALL -WHITE MELAMINE CITY HALL -WHITE MELAMINE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.76 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.47 Page: 26 Packet Page 38 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94047 2/8/2007 007253 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued) Total : 18.23 94048 2/8/2007 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 199920 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 76.87 199921 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 55.00 199922 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 58.10 199923 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 83.10 199924 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 106.59 199925 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 63.10 200266 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 119.09 200267 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 81.59 200268 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 66.75 200708 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 58.10 Total : 768.29 94049 2/8/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2884789 GRATE Page: 27 Packet Page 39 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94049 2/8/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS (Continued) 18 X 24 LOCKING GRATES FOR Cl' 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,580.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 134.30 Total : 1,714.30 94050 2/8/2007 061580 ECKSTROM INDUSTRIES 00038879 FS 17 - STAINLESS STEEL RANGE FS 17 - STAINLESS STEEL RANGE 116.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,550.00 Sales Tax 116.000.651.519.920.480.00 133.30 Total : 1,683.30 94051 2/8/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 75611 2000 BRAKE CLEANER 411.000.656.538.800.310.59 80.56 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.59 7.17 Total : 87.73 94052 2/8/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 75612 SHOP - PLUG TAP SHOP - PLUG TAP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.36 75763 UNIT K93 - STRIP CALK UNIT K93 - STRIP CALK 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.42 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.37 75872 UNIT 55 - FRESH AIR FILTERS UNIT 55 - FRESH AIR FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 119.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.59 Page: 28 Packet Page 40 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94052 2/8/2007 007675 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS (Continued) Total : 150.73 94053 2/8/2007 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E231073-1 Employment testing services Employment testing services 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 69.00 Total : 69.00 94054 2/8/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-07775 BALLINGER PARK BALLINGER PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,538.32 Total : 1,538.32 94055 2/8/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11 LIFT STATION #11 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 20.64 3-03575 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 195.50 3-07525 LIFT STATION #12 LIFT STATION #12 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 72.10 3-07709 LIFT STATION #15 LIFT STATION #15 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 22.41 3-09350 LIFT STATION #4 LIFT STATION #4 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 135.83 3-09800 LIFT STATION #10 LIFT STATION #10 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 43.65 3-29875 LIFT STATION #9 LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 47.19 Total : 537.32 94056 2/8/2007 069055 EHS INTERNATIONAL INC. 24265 ESMC.Final Pmt Site Assessment Page: 29 Packet Page 41 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94056 2/8/2007 069055 EHS INTERNATIONAL INC. (Continued) ESMC.Final Pmt Site Assessment 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 469.80 ESMC.Pmt 1 Hazardous Mtls. Desigr 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 6,463.20 Total : 6,933.00 94057 2/8/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 022442 A4273 COPIER MAINT. 411.000.656.538.800.480.11 187.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.11 16.69 Total : 204.19 94058 2/8/2007 069882 EMIL'S CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 0015203 CONCRETE WORK BRACKETT'S LANDING- 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 19,274.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,715.39 Total : 20,989.39 94059 2/8/2007 071489 EMS MAGAZINE 510-1884 ADMIN MISC EMS mag subscrptn 001.000.510.522.100.490.00 20.00 Total : 20.00 94060 2/8/2007 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES ENGLAND7633 SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE CLASSE DANCE CLASS #7633 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 750.00 DANCE CLASS #7626 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,650.00 DANCE CLASS #7631 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 450.00 Total : 2,850.00 94061 2/8/2007 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 13107 PUBLIC DEFENDER Page: 30 Packet Page 42 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94061 2/8/2007 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A (Continued) PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 8,410.00 Total : 8,410.00 94062 2/8/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0078015 SEWER INVENTORY- S-CPLGCON1 SEWER INVENTORY- S-CPLGCON, 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 12.69 S-CPLGCONC-06-030 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 15.46 S-CPLGCONC-08-010 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 34.86 S-CPLGAC-06-010 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 15.16 S-CPLGPLAS-04-010 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 22.56 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 8.97 Total : 109.70 94063 2/8/2007 071496 FIRST MUTUAL BANK ESAC.Pmt 1 Retainage ESAC.Dennis Craig Retainage #1 ESAC.Dennis Craig Retainage #1 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 2,514.81 Total : 2,514.81 94064 2/8/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC January 2007 JANUARY 2007 FLEX January 2007 Flex/Transport 811.000.000.231.590.000.00 807.57 Total : 807.57 94065 2/8/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 90171 January 2007 - Sectino 132 plan fees January 2007 - Sectino 132 plan fees 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 41.80 90173 2007 - Sec. 125 & 132 plan fees and 2007 - Sec. 125 & 132 plan fees and 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 699.90 Page: 31 Packet Page 43 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94065 2/8/2007 070855 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC (Continued) Total : 741.70 94066 2/8/2007 011917 GERMANIA SEED CO 174538 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES GARDENING SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 33.70 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 5.80 Total : 39.50 94067 2/8/2007 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 077084 TIRE INVENTORY - 18 TIRES TIRE INVENTORY - 18 TIRES 511.000.657.548.680.340.30 1,552.72 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.30 138.19 Total : 1,690.91 94068 2/8/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5001822 112830-000 TEST N TUBE REAGENT SET 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 130.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 14.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 12.71 Total : 157.11 94069 2/8/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5012781 WATER QUALITY - FLORIDE REAG WATER QUALITY - FLORIDE REAG 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 43.00 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.50 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.79 Total : 59.29 94070 2/8/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 69482 UNIT 235 - IGNITION BOOT Page: 32 Packet Page 44 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94070 2/8/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC (Continued) UNIT 235 - IGNITION BOOT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.70 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.86 Total : 10.56 94071 2/8/2007 067099 HOLLEMAN, JOHN 26 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 241.00 Total : 241.00 94072 2/8/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 7073184 6035322501434934 Stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 65.61 8063988 6035322501434934 Stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 47.16 Total : 112.77 94073 2/8/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 025839 OPS SUPPLIES Film 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 173.10 Total : 173.10 94074 2/8/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17398 E6FB.Citywide Storm Testing E6FB.Citywide Storm Testing 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 147.43 17399 E5AC.92nd/234th Intersection Safety E5AC.92nd/234th Intersection Safety 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 1,048.00 17400 ESJA.Waterline Testing ESJA.Waterline Testing 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 268.88 Total : 1,464.31 94075 2/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 71831839 COPIER LEASE Page: 33 Packet Page 45 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94075 2/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEA 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 25.83 Total : 25.83 94076 2/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 71831837 FINANCE COPIER RENTAL Finance Copier Rental 1/22-2/21/07 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07 Additional Image Charge 12/3/06-1/3. 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 180.35 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 56.47 Total : 690.89 94077 2/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 71831830 RENT 1/22/07 THRU 2/21/07 ON D.: RENT 1/22/07 THRU 2/21/07 ON D.: 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 95.44 71831833 RENT 1/22/07 THRU 2/21/07 ON D.: RENT 1/22/07 THRU 2/21/07 ON D.: 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 993.25 71831835 RENT 1/22/07 THRU 2/21/07 FOR D RENT 1/22/07 THRU 2/21/07 FOR D 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 188.94 Total : 1,277.63 94078 2/8/2007 067109 IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS S115555 INV# SI15555 EDMONDS PD - SOF- SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 2007 001.000.410.521.210.480.00 3,365.79 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.480.00 299.56 Total : 3,665.35 94079 2/8/2007 070097 INLAND TECHNOLOGY INC 62339 FILTER CASE Page: 34 Packet Page 46 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94079 2/8/2007 070097 INLAND TECHNOLOGY INC (Continued) FILTER CASE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 189.95 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 14.72 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 18.02 Total : 222.69 94080 2/8/2007 061756 JOHNSTON, THOMAS J 25 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 1,654.00 Total : 1,654.00 94081 2/8/2007 067877 KINGSTON LUMBER 940681 STREET - 4X4X12 STUDS STREET - 4X4X12 STUDS 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1,304.35 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 112.17 Total : 1,416.52 94082 2/8/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 74816 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING BA boots 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 160.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 14.08 Total : 174.08 94083 2/8/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1009098878 INV#1009098878 ACCT#7874383 E[ LARGE COVERALLS 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 81.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 13.58 Total : 94.58 94084 2/8/2007 063462 LACONNER COUNTRY INN La Conner 2007 Retre Deposit for 2007 Council Retreat Page: 35 Packet Page 47 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94084 2/8/2007 063462 LACONNER COUNTRY INN (Continued) Deposit for 2007 Council Retreat 001.000.110.511.100.430.00 359.70 Total : 359.70 94085 2/8/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0020441 ISAACSON LAND CLEARING PERK/ ISAACSON LAND CLEARING PERK/ 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 286.50 Total : 286.50 94086 2/8/2007 071483 LARMAN, ELISABETH REC042674 REFUND FOR AN APPEAL THAT C( REFUND FOR AN APPEAL THAT C( 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 205.00 Total : 205.00 94087 2/8/2007 018140 LEIN, JONATHAN 3875218 JON LEIN BOOT ALLOWANCE/LEIN 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 164.00 Total : 164.00 94088 2/8/2007 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 121120 UNIT 11 - 6 RADIAL TIRES UNIT 11 - 6 RADIAL TIRES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,936.14 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 178.32 121436 UNIT 99 - THRUST ANGLE ALIGNM UNIT 99 - THRUST ANGLE ALIGNM 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 49.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.45 Total : 2,168.86 94089 2/8/2007 071404 LIBBY WAGNER PROFESSIONAL 1089 J.LAWLESS/REGISTRATION - EDM J.LAW LESS/REGISTRATION- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 65.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 5.72 Page: 36 Packet Page 48 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94089 2/8/2007 071404 071404 LIBBY WAGNER PROFESSIONAL (Continued) Total : 70.72 94090 2/8/2007 071494 LOMONT, JANE LOMONT0131 REFUND REFUND DUE TO CANCELLED CLP 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 30.00 Total : 30.00 94091 2/8/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 092997 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 215.62 Total : 215.62 94092 2/8/2007 071448 MADSEN'S SHOP & SUPPLY INC 458215 STREET - CHAIN SUPPLIES STREET - CHAIN SUPPLIES 111.000.653.542.710.310.00 543.90 Freight 111.000.653.542.710.310.00 17.09 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.710.310.00 44.31 Total : 605.30 94093 2/8/2007 061900 MARC 0321102-IN 00-0902224 LAUNDRY DETERGENT 411.000.656.538.800.310.59 320.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.59 28.48 Total : 348.48 94094 2/8/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 2849 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 165.00 2850 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 60.00 2856 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 105.00 Page: 37 Packet Page 49 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94094 2/8/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA (Continued) 2857 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 2864 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 2869 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 Total : 465.00 94095 2/8/2007 064047 MCCONNELL & ASSOCIATES 853 HEARING EXAMINER FEES FOR Ji HEARING EXAMINER FEES FOR Ji 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,503.26 Total : 3,503.26 94096 2/8/2007 071498 MCCOY, CLAUDE AND JACQUELINE 1-22575 RE: 3-0611-053 UTILITY REFUND RE: 3-0611-053 Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 97.57 Total : 97.57 94097 2/8/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 57616030 123106800 O-RING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.83 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.10 57680389 123106800 WORKBENCH.CAP SCREW/OUTLE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 604.48 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 109.60 Page: 38 Packet Page 50 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94097 2/8/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO (Continued) 58079220 123106800 SHELF CABINET/MAGNETIC CATCI 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 652.86 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 129.50 58088379 123106800 PVC STRAINER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 162.51 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.33 58210634 123106800 CABINET/LOCK RING PLIER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 135.71 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 78.94 Total : 1,887.86 94098 2/8/2007 068910 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO-CONTROL CORP PH112049 ALS MACH/EQUIPMT Defi b/monitor/pacer 001.000.510.594.260.640.00 19,024.90 Freight 001.000.510.594.260.640.00 37.31 Sales Tax 001.000.510.594.260.640.00 1,677.49 PH116118 ALS MACH/EQUIPMT defib pouches 001.000.510.594.260.640.00 97.75 Freight 001.000.510.594.260.640.00 12.23 Sales Tax 001.000.510.594.260.640.00 9.66 Total : 20,859.34 94099 2/8/2007 069592 METROCALL Q0298897A INV#Q0298897A ACCT#0298897-0 E Page: 39 Packet Page 51 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94099 2/8/2007 069592 METROCALL (Continued) PAGERS 1/27-2/26/07 001.000.410.521.100.420.00 79.65 Total : 79.65 94100 2/8/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 39755 SUPPLIES Rental of Brush Mower 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 270.00 Total : 270.00 94101 2/8/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 39046 131 PROPANE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 34.68 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.09 Total : 37.77 94102 2/8/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 39367 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS carbide chain 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 176.25 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 15.69 39612 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS Stihl 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 50.95 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 4.53 Total : 247.42 94103 2/8/2007 069471 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MACHADO REG - INSTRUCTOR RECERT./D.M, D. MAC HADO/REG I STRAT I O N- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 94104 2/8/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0313222-IN FLEET OIL FILTER INVENTORY Page: 40 Packet Page 52 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94104 2/8/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued) FLEET OIL FILTER INVENTORY 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 127.53 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 10.97 Total : 138.50 94105 2/8/2007 070788 NETRIVER INC 34968 HOSTING PACKAGE NON PROFIT HOSTING PACKAGE 001.000.240.513.110.410.00 39.00 Total : 39.00 94106 2/8/2007 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB7584 FUN FACTORY FUN FACTORY #7584- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 912.00 FUN FACTORY #7585- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 912.00 MINI ME FUN FACTORY- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 450.00 Total : 2,274.00 94107 2/8/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 411191318-062 SPRINT CELL SERVICES - BLDG. E SPRINT CELL SERVICES - BLDG. E 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 112.23 Total : 112.23 94108 2/8/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1258906.001 FLUOR. LAMP FLUOR. LAMP 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 196.80 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 16.92 Total : 213.72 94109 2/8/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0075979 SODIUM BISFULFITE Page: 41 Packet Page 53 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94109 2/8/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC (Continued) SODIUM BISFULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 2,451.30 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 218.17 Total : 2,669.47 94110 2/8/2007 070045 NORTHUP GROUP 1335 INV#1335 - PRE -EMPLOYMENT - El PRE -EMPLOYMENT EXAM- 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 94111 2/8/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0413872 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 Total : 95.36 94112 2/8/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 453 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 1/24/( PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 1/24/( 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 390.00 Total : 390.00 94113 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 437367 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 44.61 725773 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 166.27 818225 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 61.00 Total : 271.88 94114 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 921602 Office Supplies - HR Page: 42 Packet Page 54 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94114 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 121.20 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 10.66 Total : 131.86 94115 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 422447 OFFICE SUPPLIES ASSORTED COLORED COPY PAPE 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 121.28 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 10.67 435465 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11 X 17 PAPER 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 26.86 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.37 486169 OFFICE SUPPLIES CATALOG ENVELOPES, MARKERS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 61.20 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 5.38 523309 OFFICE SUPPLIES RULER, ETC. 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 6.75 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 0.50 684639 OFFICE SUPPLIES STAPLER 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 22.72 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 1.91 Total : 259.64 94116 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 877157 8 Outlet UPS Backup Page: 43 Packet Page 55 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94116 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC ZO AI aE:7P�iZ�rZiI:lc 7i11901391012iYAU 30910kIll:7_[O&i1►101 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 8 Outlet UPS Backup 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1,116.00 Labels, rubberbands & dividers 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 32.43 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 98.21 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 2.85 Total : 1,249.49 250675 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 74.47 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 6.55 259725 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 2.76 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 0.24 299424 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 98.16 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 8.64 797898 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 39.79 Service Charge 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 3.51 Page: 44 Packet Page 56 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94117 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) 857635 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 98.16 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 8.64 920748 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 213.32 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 18.77 Total : 574.01 94118 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 342085 PW ADMIN - ENV OPENERS PW ADMIN - ENV OPENERS 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 7.88 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 0.69 639689 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - BINDERS, ; PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - BINDERS, ; 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 27.59 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 2.35 819907 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - POST -ITS, PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - POST -ITS, 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 67.17 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 5.92 Total : 111.60 94119 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 624549 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - D.S. DE MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - D.S. DE 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 264.28 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 23.26 Page: 45 Packet Page 57 of 313 vchlist 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 46 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94119 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) 805519 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - D.S. DE MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - D.S. DE 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 348.62 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 30.67 Total : 666.83 94120 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 851597 OPS SUPPLIES Stn's office supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 143.20 King County Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 12.60 875767 OPS SUPPLIES Stations' paper 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 75.22 King County Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 6.69 875768 OPS SUPPLIES note pads 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1.20 King County Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 0.10 Total : 239.01 94121 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 781956 INV#781956 ACCT#520437 250POL Page: 46 Packet Page 58 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 47 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94121 2/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 94122 94123 Invoice (Continued) 2/8/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 2/8/2007 064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO SS06279G207 PO # Description/Account Amount POST -IT FLAGS, REINFORCEMENT 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 20.12 PACKING TAPE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 20.28 LEGAL PADS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.87 COMPRESSED AIR DUSTERS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.33 BINDERS AND INDEX SHEETS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 61.80 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.78 Total : 133.18 WATER/SEWER 223700 104TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 190.43 Total : 190.43 PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN - Page: 47 Packet Page 59 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 48 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94123 2/8/2007 064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO 94124 94125 Invoice (Continued) 2/8/2007 069214 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. OF EVERETT 13417 2/8/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 41558 PO # Description/Account Amount PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN- 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 183.97 PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN- 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 183.97 PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN- 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 321.94 PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN- 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 413.92 PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN- 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 367.93 PW ELEVATOR OPERATION MAIN- 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 367.93 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 16.37 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 16.37 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 28.65 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 36.84 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 32.75 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 32.75 Total : 2,003.39 FS 16 - DIGITAL REMOTE FS 16 - DIGITAL REMOTE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 89.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.70 Total : 97.20 STORM - DUMP FEES Page: 48 Packet Page 60 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 49 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94125 2/8/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS (Continued) STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 41568 STORM -DUMP FEES STORM -DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 41582 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 41593 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 41607 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 Total : 440.00 94126 2/8/2007 064070 PALMATIER, LISA PALMATIER0107 CONCERT COORDINATION COORDINATION OF PARK CONCEI 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 450.00 Total : 450.00 94127 2/8/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9406335 COPIER CONTRACT COPIER CONTRACT 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 12.60 Total : 157.82 94128 2/8/2007 071488 PARENTMAP 107067 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL ADVE DISPLAY AD FOR MEADOWDALE F 001.000.640.574.200.440.00 298.00 207011 PRESCHOOL ADVERTISING FEBRUARY 2007 DISPLAY AD 001.000.640.574.200.440.00 298.00 Total : 596.00 Page: 49 Packet Page 61 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 50 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94129 2/8/2007 027280 PATRICKS PRINTING 34850 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 87.63 Total : 87.63 94130 2/8/2007 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK7497 WIGGLES & GIGGLES WIGGLES & GIGGLES #7497 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 382.20 Total : 382.20 94131 2/8/2007 069065 PIONEER RESEARCH CORP. 194099 SUPPLIES GRAFFITI TURBO TOWELS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 349.00 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.56 Total : 393.56 94132 2/8/2007 028400 PITNEY BOWES 612578 SUPPLIES Ink for Stamp machine 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 144.39 Total : 144.39 94133 2/8/2007 070979 PRECISION EARTHWORKS, INC E5MD.Pmt.1 ESMD.Skate Park Pmt 1 ESMD.Skate Park Pmt 1 132.000.640.594.760.650.00 100,423.87 Total : 100,423.87 94134 2/8/2007 071184 PROCOM 2007-1153 Jan 07 Prof Service Fiber Optic Proje Jan 07 Prof Service Fiber Optic Proje 001.000.390.528.200.410.00 4,968.75 Total : 4,968.75 94135 2/8/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 291104 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -PA Page: 50 Packet Page 62 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 51 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94135 2/8/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE (Continued) 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -PA 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 43.43 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -PA 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.42 Fire Monitoring F/S 16- 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 90.00 Total : 176.85 94136 2/8/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANN 0013330-IN EDMCITW ALUMINIZED APRON/SLEEVE 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 131.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 7.65 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 11.69 Total : 150.74 94137 2/8/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY 411.000.656.538.800.472.63 3,249.38 Total : 3,249.38 94138 2/8/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 635.97 0230757007 PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 628.97 1916766007 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 80.42 2753166004 PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & CC PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & CC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 843.40 Page: 51 Packet Page 63 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 52 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94138 2/8/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 2776365005 Public Works Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 78.96 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 300.06 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 300.06 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 300.06 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 300.06 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 300.05 2986629000 LIFT STATION #13 LIFT STATION #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 85.65 3689976003 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 864.28 5254926008 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 451.58 5672895009 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.74 6439566008 PUBLIC SAFETY -FIRE STATION PUBLIC SAFETY -FIRE STATION 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,053.60 6490327001 ANDERSON CENTER ANDERSON CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 6,422.58 8851908007 LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.64 Page: 52 Packet Page 64 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 53 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94138 2/8/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 9919661109 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 949.60 Total : 14,677.68 94139 2/8/2007 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 07-013 COURT SECURITY OFFICER COURT SECURITY OFFICER 001.000.230.512.500.410.00 1,940.00 Total : 1,940.00 94140 2/8/2007 065579 QUIKSIGN 55079 S-06123 - SIGN INSTALLATION S-06123 - SIGN INSTALLATION 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 272.80 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 24.01 55151 ADB-06-149 SIGN INSTALLATION ADB-06-149 SIGN INSTALLATION 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 156.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 13.73 55152 V-06-150 SIGN INSTALLATION V-06-150 SIGN INSTALLATION 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 156.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 13.73 Total : 636.27 94141 2/8/2007 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 73657 MARKER MARKER: SCHMITT 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 285.00 73658 INSCRIPTION INSCRIPTION: HARDIE 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00 Total : 360.00 Page: 53 Packet Page 65 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 54 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94142 2/8/2007 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B FLOW METERING STATIONS FLOW METERING STATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.80 Total : 137.80 94143 2/8/2007 031600 RELIABLE FLOOR COVERINGS 107822 CITY HALL - 4" ROPPE CITY HALL - 4" ROPPE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 108.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.61 Total : 117.61 94144 2/8/2007 071499 RH HOOVER INC 3-00982 RE: # 206136065 UTILITY REFUND RE: # 206136065 Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 60.62 Total : 60.62 94145 2/8/2007 066977 RHOMAR INDUSTRIES INC 057375 STREET - LUBRA-SEAL STREET -LUBRA-SEAL 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 443.40 Freight 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 93.40 Total : 536.80 94146 2/8/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9411930731 STREET - WASHED SAND STREET - WASHED SAND 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 460.18 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 39.58 9411943170 STREET - WASHED SAND STREET - WASHED SAND 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 699.60 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 60.18 Total : 1,259.54 94147 2/8/2007 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 4777 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE Page: 54 Packet Page 66 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 55 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94147 2/8/2007 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN (Continued) PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 94148 2/8/2007 071490 RYBICKI, DANIEL J 8850 OPS PRO SERVICES Fit for duty eval 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 1,250.00 Total : 1,250.00 94149 2/8/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 250519 INV#250519 EDMONDS PD PICK UP 2 ANIMAL CARCASSES 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 19.50 250569 INV#250569 EDMONDS PD PICK UP 2 ANIMAL CARCASSES 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 19.50 395395 INV#395395 EDMONDS PD PICK UP 1 ANIMAL CARCASS 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 9.75 444723 INV#444723 EDMONDS PD PICK UP 3 ANIMAL CARCASSES 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 29.25 Total : 78.00 94150 2/8/2007 033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL 2162352 STREET- JET SET, COLD PATCH STREET- JET SET, COLD PATCH 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 1,375.00 Freight 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 85.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 128.48 Total : 1,588.48 94151 2/8/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY SAWDON0203 GYM MONITOR ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITC 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 36.00 Page: 55 Packet Page 67 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 56 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94151 2/8/2007 071007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY (Continued) Total : 36.00 94152 2/8/2007 061482 SEA -WESTERN INC 113091 OPS REPAIR/MAINT MSA filter replacement 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 95.68 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 5.78 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 8.93 Total : 110.39 94153 2/8/2007 065977 SERVICE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 905366 EDM002 REMOVE POLE 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 1,188.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 105.78 Total : 1,294.28 94154 2/8/2007 036041 SETINA MFG CO 142362 INV#142362 CUST#WAWSEDM001 PAIR OF PUSH BUMPERS 001.000.410.521.260.350.00 159.20 PAIR OF WRAP AROUND FENDER; 001.000.410.521.260.350.00 260.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.260.350.00 16.67 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.350.00 36.61 Total : 472.48 94155 2/8/2007 070165 SEW-EURODRIVE 877836 04419600 GEAR BOX PARTS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 702.50 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 14.87 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 63.85 Page: 56 Packet Page 68 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 57 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94155 2/8/2007 070165 070165 SEW-EURODRIVE (Continued) Total : 781.22 94156 2/8/2007 036070 SHANNON TOWING INC 188108 INV#188108 EDMONDS PD TOW 87 JEEP A31808M 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 124.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 11.03 Total : 135.03 94157 2/8/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 253317 GARDENING SUPPLIES BUILDERS SAND AND KNEELING F 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 27.88 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.45 Total : 30.33 94158 2/8/2007 071492 SMITH & WESSON BLACKBURN S&W REGISTRATION/BLACKBURN BLACKBURN/REGISTRATION & MA 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 246.00 DJ.SMITH S&W REGISTRATION/DAMIAN SMI' DAMIAN SMITH/REG & MATERIALS 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 246.00 DREYER S&W REGISTRATION/T. DREYER - T. D REYE R/REG I STRAT I O N- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 125.00 MACHADO S&W REGISTRATION/D. MACHADC D. MAC HAD O/REG I STRAT I O N- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 125.00 MCINTYRE S&W REGISTRATION/B.MCI NTYRE B. MCI NTYRE/REG I STRAT I O N- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 125.00 MORRISON S&W REGISTRATION/S.MORRISOP S.MORRISON/REG & MATERIALS- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 246.00 Page: 57 Packet Page 69 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 58 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94158 2/8/2007 071492 SMITH & WESSON (Continued) PAULSON S&W REGISTRATION/B.PAULSON B. PAULSON/REG ISTRATION- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 125.00 RICHARDSON S&W REGISTRATION/M.RICHARDE M. RICHARDSON/REG ISTRATI ON- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 125.00 Total : 1,363.00 94159 2/8/2007 037225 SNO CO CLERKS & FINANCE ASSOC 2007 Finance 2007 Membership Junglov, Monroe, 2007 Membership Junglov, Monroe, 001.000.310.514.230.490.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 94160 2/8/2007 070304 SNO CO FIRE PREVENTION 07-01 PREVTN MISC MS, JW 2006 code class fee 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 100.00 Total : 100.00 94161 2/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2470011830 PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,065.68 3430013627 OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,395.08 3850013073 IRRIGATION CONTROL IRRIGATION CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 32.18 3890014081 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 515.86 5040011628 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 148.36 Page: 58 Packet Page 70 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 59 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94161 2/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 5070014260 UTILITY BILLING 930 9TH AVE N 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.21 Total : 3,188.37 94162 2/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 261008098 620-001-500-3 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.60 Total : 7.60 94163 2/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2070015082 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 201.39 2260043795 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 49.07 2330012283 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 32.67 2440024129 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 189.58 2480017397 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 817.41 2540012560 LIFT STATION #4 LIFT STATION #4 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 569.82 2670022181 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,565.27 2790022228 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 57.36 Page: 59 Packet Page 71 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 60 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94163 2/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 2880027277 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 34.13 3050047152 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 303.63 3350014902 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 49.59 3710011507 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 54.75 3800017489 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 74.89 3850011440 LIFT STATION #12 LIFT STATION #12 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 375.87 4070022027 LIFT STATION #15 LIFT STATION #15 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.16 4130026596 LIFT STATION #11 LIFT STATION #11 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 34.09 4210013902 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 58.30 4320012174 STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 684.79 4330014129 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 385.61 Page: 60 Packet Page 72 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 61 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94163 2/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 5360023807 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 16.96 5500019350 LOG CABIN LOG CABIN 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 598.31 Total : 8,186.65 94164 2/8/2007 037376 SNO CO PUD NO 1 07-01-062 SECONDARY RISER/PEDESTAL SECONDARY RISER/PEDESTAL 411.000.656.538.800.480.22 853.00 Total : 853.00 94165 2/8/2007 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT AR133220 INV#AR133220 ACCT#C000569 EDP HEP B SHOT 1/2/07 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 64.00 Total : 64.00 94166 2/8/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC Feb-07 02/07 Recreation Servies Contract FE 02/07 Recreation Servies Contract FE 001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67 Jan-07 01/07 Recreation Service Contract FE 01/07 Recreation Service Contract FE 001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67 Total : 9,583.34 94167 2/8/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587 DISPOSAL FEES DUMP FEES FOR JANUARY 2007 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 576.16 Total : 576.16 94168 2/8/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40 Page: 61 Packet Page 73 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 62 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94168 2/8/2007 038300 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) Total : 24.78 94169 2/8/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS garbage & recycle for PS 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 487.49 03585 garbage & recycle for FAC garbage & recycle for FAC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.90 03586 garbage & recycle for Library garbage & recycle for Library 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 491.20 03588 garbage & recycle -City Hall garbage & recycle -City Hall 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 379.46 Total : 1,915.05 94170 2/8/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2247304-01 STORM - 5 JEANS / M BROWN STORM - 5 JEANS / M BROWN 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 142.50 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 12.26 4106088-01 STREET - 5 JEANS / J WHATMORE STREET - 5 JEANS / J WHATMORE 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 172.90 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 15.39 4106351-01 STORM - 5 JEANS/ T MOLES STORM - 5 JEANS/ T MOLES 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 165.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 14.69 4106527-01 STREET - 5 JEANS / T BACH STREET - 5 JEANS / T BACH 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 168.20 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 14.97 Page: 62 Packet Page 74 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 63 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94170 2/8/2007 038410 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS (Continued) Total : 705.91 94171 2/8/2007 071473 STAHL, WILLIAM BLD2005-1173 REFUND - PROJECT WITHDRAWN REFUND - PROJECT WITHDRAWN 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 880.00 Total : 880.00 94172 2/8/2007 070684 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 127689 53769 C-161 SCREEINGS SYSTEM IMPRC 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 2,537.71 Total : 2,537.71 94173 2/8/2007 070287 STARTZMAN, DON BOOTS 2007 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE FOR D S' 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE FOR D S' 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 164.00 Total : 164.00 94174 2/8/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2518421 WATER/SEWER - 20' LADDER WATER/SEWER - 20' LADDER 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 131.22 WATER/SEWER - 20' LADDER 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 131.22 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.29 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.28 2518423 WATER/SEWER - LUBRICANT, HAP WATER/SEWER - LUBRICANT, HAP 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 181.74 WATER/SEWER - LUBRICANT, HAP 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 181.73 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.63 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.62 Page: 63 Packet Page 75 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 64 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94174 2/8/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC Invoice (Continued) 2519927 2523672 2523676 �i y r6�aE:7P�iZ�rZiZr> rZ [ili> �� _1:� 1► Ul�b� � 7 I_1 ��J d : � A'� 1 � [��Z:1!Li PO # Description/Account Amount WATER/SEWER - BLUE SILICONE WATER/SEWER - BLUE SILICONE 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 23.97 WATER/SEWER - BLUE SILICONE 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 23.97 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.06 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.06 WATER/SEWER - GOJO LIME CLE) WATER/SEWER - GOJO LIME CLE) 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.50 WATER/SEWER - GOJO LIME CLE) 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.50 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.65 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.64 WATER/SEWER - LIME CLEANSER WATER/SEWER - LIME CLEANSER 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.62 WATER/SEWER - LIME CLEANSER 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.61 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.34 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.34 Total : 781.99 OPS SUPPLIES hose reel 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 100.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 8.60 Page: 64 Packet Page 76 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 65 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 94175 2/8/2007 009400 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC (Continued) 94176 2/8/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 881739 881740 881741 887380 94177 2/8/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10486025 Description/Account Amount Total : 108.60 PW - ELECT SUPPLIES PW - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.82 CITY HALL - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 75.81 PW - ELECT SUPPLIES 116.000.651.519.920.310.00 29.05 FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 238.60 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.85 Sales Tax 116.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.59 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.23 FS 20 FS 20 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 122.33 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.89 FS 20 - ELECT SUPPLIES FS 20 - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.96 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.07 OLD PW - ELECT SUPPLIES OLD PW - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 215.17 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.15 Total : 841.52 SUPPLIES Page: 65 Packet Page 77 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 66 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94177 2/8/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) STEEL FLAT WASHERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.97 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.35 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.27 Total : 15.59 94178 2/8/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10486026 STREET - SCREWS & WASHERS STREET - SCREWS & WASHERS 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 22.37 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.99 Total : 24.36 94179 2/8/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1473314 Engineering Specialist, #07-02 Engineering Specialist, #07-02 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 39.51 Total : 39.51 94180 2/8/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1466972 NEWSPAPER ADS Newspaper ads 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,681.19 Total : 1,681.19 94181 2/8/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 1891047001 C/A 042483000 Engineering Specialist, #07-02 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 195.95 Total : 195.95 94182 2/8/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 588203 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MON SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAIN 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.00 Page: 66 Packet Page 78 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 67 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94182 2/8/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR (Continued) 609368 MUSEUM monthly elevator maint-museum- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 162.05 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.42 609369 FAC monthly elevator maint-FAC- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 714.95 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 63.62 609371 PUBLIC SAFETY quarterly elevator maint-PS- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 596.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 53.09 609372 MONITORING -PS monitoring-PS- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 35.15 609373 MONTHLY ELEVATOR MONITORIN Monthly elevator maint-Library- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 53.80 711983 MONTHLY ELEVATOR MAINT-LIBR, Monthly elevator maint-Library- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 708.61 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 63.06 Total : 2,475.25 94183 2/8/2007 064963 TOP FOODS 375711 TRAINING SUPPLIES Training burn lunches 001.000.510.522.400.310.00 249.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.400.310.00 22.23 Page: 67 Packet Page 79 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 68 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94183 2/8/2007 064963 TOP FOODS (Continued) 375717 OPS SUPPLIES stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 17.94 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1.60 Total : 291.52 94184 2/8/2007 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES Acct# 161 MEBT services through 1/07 MEBT services through 1/07 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 57.93 Total : 57.93 94185 2/8/2007 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 12898 CITY HALL - SUPRA BOX, DRIVER CITY HALL - SUPRA BOX, DRIVER 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 44.90 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.00 Total : 48.90 94186 2/8/2007 065934 TUNE TALES TUNETALES7696 TUNE TALES CLASSES TUNE TALES #7696- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,047.20 TUNE TALES #7697- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,236.00 TUNE TALES #7698- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 846.40 Total : 3,129.60 94187 2/8/2007 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 309376 WATER - SOCKET SETS WATER - SOCKET SETS 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 112.08 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.48 Total : 123.56 94188 2/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM Page: 68 Packet Page 80 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 69 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94188 2/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.87 425-771-4741 EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 50.25 Total : 93.12 94189 2/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.03 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 269.35 425-206-1141 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.43 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.22 425-206-4810 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.17 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.32 425-206-8379 MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 13.47 425-673-5978 LIFT STATION #1 Lift Station #1 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 47.39 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY STATIONS TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 27.79 TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 27.79 Page: 69 Packet Page 81 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 70 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94189 2/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) 425-712-8251 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 10.64 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 53.17 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 43.60 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 43.60 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 61.68 425-712-8347 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 57.05 425-771-0158 FS # 16 FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 228.27 425-775-2455 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 47.38 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 114.75 425-778-3297 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 17.79 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 33.03 Total : 1,414.92 94190 2/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE FS #16-FAX LINE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.21 Total : 50.21 Page: 70 Packet Page 82 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 71 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94191 2/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2109750916 CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 3.00 Total : 3.00 94192 2/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2106070070 206-595-3117 PRETREATMENT CELL 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 36.18 Total : 36.18 94193 2/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 364280677-00001 360-929-3167 cell phone- Jim Kammerer 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.44 cell phone- Jim Kammerer 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.44 464229910-1 206-999-9374 sewer lead cell phone 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 69.29 470091643-00001 425-238-8846 cell phone -Tod Moles 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 33.80 470103273-00001 425-238-5456 cell phone -Mike Johnson 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 29.61 770096328-00001 425-238-8252 cell phone -Dave Sittauer 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 2.85 Total : 140.43 94194 2/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2109109926 INV#2109109926 ACCT#470497482- CELL PHONES 01/24-2/23/07 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 127.15 Total : 127.15 94195 2/8/2007 064002 VIS SEED COMPANY 3988 FLOWER PROGRAM Page: 71 Packet Page 83 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 72 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94195 2/8/2007 064002 VIS SEED COMPANY (Continued) FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 69.70 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 6.95 Total : 76.65 94196 2/8/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 29221226 1066294 PAPER GLASS/PIPET/GLOVES/STI 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 620.95 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 55.28 Total : 676.23 94197 2/8/2007 046100 WA ST ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS INC 14070 TRAINING MISC Ford, Petrella conf fee 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 850.00 Total : 850.00 94198 2/8/2007 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH 006014 ROB SEBERS SEBERS/ WATER WORK CERTF. 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 77.00 007358 STEVE KOHO KOHO/WATER WORKS CERTF. 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 77.00 010808 DERREK AMBURGEY AMBURGEY/WATER WORKS CERI 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 77.00 Total : 231.00 94199 2/8/2007 047605 WA ST TREASURER 4TH QUARTER 4TH QUARTER FORFEITED PROPE QUARTERLY REPORT 001.000.000.237.240.000.00 30.00 Total : 30.00 94200 2/8/2007 047605 WA ST TREASURER KALINA FED FIREARM LIC.-KALINA/ADVEN Page: 72 Packet Page 84 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 73 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94200 2/8/2007 047605 WA ST TREASURER (Continued) FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSE - JC 001.000.000.237.000.000.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 94201 2/8/2007 062552 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 01765474 RON HALL WEF RENEWAL/HALL 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 69.00 Total : 69.00 94202 2/8/2007 026510 WCIA 700650-0612 E7FB.Hinrichs, Claim No. GCO25231 E7FB.Hinrichs, Claim No. GCO25231 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 688.50 Total : 688.50 94203 2/8/2007 068150 WESTERN TIRE CHAIN 20765 STREET - CROSS CHAIN 7/0-12 STREET - CROSS CHAIN 7/0-12 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 378.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.660.310.00 32.51 Total : 410.51 94204 2/8/2007 061047 WWCPA 2007 DUES 2007 ANNUAL DUES FOR J CLEME 2007 ANNUAL DUES FOR J CLEME 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 10.00 Total : 10.00 94205 2/8/2007 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 218 JAN 07 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.360.515.230.410.00 6,000.00 Total : 6,000.00 94206 2/8/2007 071497 ZURICH NORTH AMERICA MO17651979-001-00001 FLEET MAINT - COMMERCIAL STO FLEET MAINT - COMMERCIAL STO 511.000.657.548.680.460.00 1,290.00 Total : 1,290.00 Page: 73 Packet Page 85 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 74 02/09/2007 9:29:15AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 229 Vouchers for bank code : front 229 Vouchers in this report Invoice PO # Description/Account Bank total Total vouchers Amount 578,468.54 578,468.54 Page: 74 Packet Page 86 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94207 2/15/2007 070941 AAF INTERNATIONAL 600001 FAC MAINT - AIR FILTER SUPPLIE: FAC MAINT - AIR FILTER SUPPLIE: 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 599.64 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 53.37 Total : 653.01 94208 2/15/2007 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 37421 CITY HALL - PHOTO SMOKE DETE CITY HALL - PHOTO SMOKE DETE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 85.75 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.63 Total : 93.38 94209 2/15/2007 070479 ABSORPTION CORP 109906 300278 ABSORPTION PADS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 256.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 34.92 Total : 290.92 94210 2/15/2007 070963 ACTION FLAG CO 4495 FAC MAINT FLAG SUPPLY FAC MAINT FLAG SUPPLY 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 158.40 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.92 Total : 168.32 94211 2/15/2007 071373 AGRO DISTRIBUTING LLC 2136050 RI SUPPLIES CROSSBOW,CASORON 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 450.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.61 Total : 489.61 Page: 1 Packet Page 87 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94212 2/15/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8195 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CI MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CI 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 98,406.52 Total : 98,406.52 94213 2/15/2007 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 3-0197-0800478 FS 20 - GARBAGE JAN 07 FS 20 - GARBAGE JAN 07 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 82.01 3-0197-0800897 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.36 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 77.37 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 77.37 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 77.37 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 77.37 PW - GARBAGE -JAN 07 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 77.38 3-0197-0801132 FS 16 - GARBAGE JAN 07 FS 16 - GARBAGE JAN 07 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 98.93 3-0197-0829729 MCH - GARBAGE JAN 07 MCH - GARBAGE JAN 07 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 52.61 Total : 640.77 94214 2/15/2007 066148 APWA 2007173 APWA 2007 SPRING CONFERENCE APWA 2007 SPRING CONFERENCE 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 400.00 Total : 400.00 94215 2/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3813438 UNIFORM SERVICES Page: 2 Packet Page 88 of 313 vchlist 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 3 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94215 2/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 35.46 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.16 Total : 38.62 94216 2/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3805183 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 90.32 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.04 512-3809067 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 88.56 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.88 Total : 194.80 94217 2/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3812143 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 Page: 3 Packet Page 89 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94217 2/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3812144 ADMIN MATS ADMIN MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 ADMIN MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 ADMIN MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 ADMIN MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 ADMIN MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 ADMIN MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 11.75 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 1.03 Page: 4 Packet Page 90 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94217 2/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) 512-3812145 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3813439 FACILITIES UNIFORM SVC FACILITIES UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 Total : 105.55 94218 2/15/2007 068379 ARCHITECREATION INC MSC-06-0845 PARK IMPROVEMENTS BENCH RE -COATING PROCESS, P 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 4,170.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 366.96 Total : 4,536.96 94219 2/15/2007 071120 ASHLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 2500024656 113007/0702 POLYMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.51 1,937.50 Total : 1,937.50 94220 2/15/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 554282 75179 DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 3,672.11 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 293.77 Total : 3,965.88 Page: 5 Packet Page 91 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94221 2/15/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 554023 PS - 103 GAL DIESEL FOR GENER) PS - 103 GAL DIESEL FOR GENER) 001.000.651.519.920.320.00 178.49 WA ST SVC FEE 001.000.651.519.920.320.00 60.00 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 001.000.651.519.920.320.00 1.56 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.320.00 19.20 Total : 259.25 94222 2/15/2007 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM PARKS FAX MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 35.01 Total : 35.01 94223 2/15/2007 063547 ATCO INTERNATIONAL 10158713 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 368.40 Total : 368.40 94224 2/15/2007 002100 BARNARD, EARL 26 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 1,605.50 Total : 1,605.50 94225 2/15/2007 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 4257 Asst. Gymnastics Instructor, #07-03 Asst. Gymnastics Instructor, #07-03 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 19.38 Total : 19.38 94226 2/15/2007 060502 BERG, COLIN BERG7622 TAIJIQUAN CLASSES TAIJIQUAN #7622 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 324.00 Total : 324.00 94227 2/15/2007 071503 BLUEPRINT MANAGEMENT Peer Rev Dep Refund 20925-76th Peer Review Part Refund Page: 6 Packet Page 92 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94227 2/15/2007 071503 BLUEPRINT MANAGEMENT (Continued) 20925-76th Peer Review Part Refund 001.000.000.245.900.620.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 94228 2/15/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 562820 INV#562820 EDMONDS PD - MOOR LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRTS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 239.85 SERVICE BARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.85 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 21.62 Total : 267.32 94229 2/15/2007 067947 BROWNELLS INC 04246986.00 INV#04246986.00 ACCT#00557761 I EXTRACTOR SPRING ASSEMBLY 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 12.00 REAR SIGHT ASSEMBLY 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 27.90 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 9.25 04246986.01 INV#04246986.01 CUST#00557761 I LOWER RECEIVER PARTS KIT 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 88.00 Total : 137.15 94230 2/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY103134 SUPPLIES WELDING SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 33.76 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.01 Total : 36.77 94231 2/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN01071010 2954000 Page: 7 Packet Page 93 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94231 2/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) ARGON/N ITROG EN/OXYGEN 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 30.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.67 Total : 32.67 94232 2/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 103159 WATER - 20 LB CARBON DIOX FEE WATER - 20 LB CARBON DIOX FEE 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 36.31 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.23 RN01071006 FLEET- CYLINDER RENTAL FLEET- CYLINDER RENTAL 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 7.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 0.67 RN01071009 SEWER - CYLINDER RENTAL FEES SEWER - CYLINDER RENTAL FEES 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 7.50 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 0.67 RN1071011 WATER/SEWER - CYLINDER AND WATER/SEWER - CYLINDER AND! 411.000.654.534.800.450.00 15.00 WATER/SEWER - CYLINDER AND! 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 15.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.450.00 1.34 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 1.33 Total : 88.55 94233 2/15/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT7655 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #7655 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 67.20 Page: 8 Packet Page 94 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94233 2/15/2007 064840 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E (Continued) Total : 67.20 94234 2/15/2007 003710 CHEVRON USA 7898305185702 INV#7898305185702 ACCT#789-83C FUEL FOR JANUARY 2007 104.000.410.521.210.320.00 262.49 Total : 262.49 94235 2/15/2007 071305 CHIEF 493221 INV#493221 CUST#235024 EDMON NIK Q TESTS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 160.93 NIK U TESTS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 114.95 NIK A TESTS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 149.90 NIK K TESTS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 161.91 Freight 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 27.99 Total : 615.68 94236 2/15/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460557432 UNIFORMS Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 105.43 Stn 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 105.44 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.39 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.38 460557451 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 115.28 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.26 Total : 355.18 Page: 9 Packet Page 95 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94237 2/15/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5140 MAINT./OPERATIONS SEWER - FE MAINT./OPERATIONS SEWER - FE 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83 Total : 13,800.83 94238 2/15/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USAGE FOR JAN 07 WATER USAGE FOR JAN 07 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 510.00 Total : 510.00 94239 2/15/2007 070231 CNR INC 11124 02/07 MONTHLY MAINT FEE 02/07 Phone Maintenance 001.000.390.528.800.480.00 736.67 Sales Tax 001.000.390.528.800.480.00 65.56 50277 Labor for service at WWTP Labor for service at WWTP 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 75.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 6.68 Total : 883.91 94240 2/15/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1747845 FAC MAINT - SE CLEANER, VERSA FAC MAINT - SE CLEANER, VERSA 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 554.98 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.06 Total : 606.54 94241 2/15/2007 071236 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES 01-044555-0 273384 OIL & GREASE TESTING 411.000.656.538.800.410.31 620.00 Total : 620.00 94242 2/15/2007 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-7587 P379 INV#3-7587 P379 EDMONDS PD LA Page: 10 Packet Page 96 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94242 2/15/2007 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC (Continued) LATE FEE FOR K-93 001.000.410.521.260.640.00 237.16 Total : 237.16 94243 2/15/2007 068815 CORRECT EQUIPMENT 7857 SEAL/O RING SEAL/O RING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 240.64 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.99 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.62 Total : 267.25 94244 2/15/2007 068190 DATEC INC 101070 INV#101070 EDMONDS PD PANASONIC CF-30 LAPTOPS 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 55,935.00 512MB UPGRADES 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 1,755.00 PANASONIC COMBO DRIVE CF-30 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 254.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 5,099.07 Total : 63,043.07 94245 2/15/2007 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING cpls jan/feb 07 STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PI: State Share of Concealed Pistol 001.000.000.237.190.000.00 252.00 Total : 252.00 94246 2/15/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2007-WA0024058 WA0024058 WASTEWATER PERMIT 411.000.656.538.800.510.00 29,016.90 Total : 29,016.90 94247 2/15/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201566050 FAC MAINT - DISINFECTANT, QUIC Page: 11 Packet Page 97 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94247 2/15/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN (Continued) FAC MAINT - DISINFECTANT, QUIC 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 51.70 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.34 201566075 FAC MAINT - GLOVES, BOWL MOP FAC MAINT - GLOVES, BOWL MOP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 104.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.78 Total : 169.37 94248 2/15/2007 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2007010127 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 Scan Services for Jan 07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 382.96 I134950 VIEWSONIC VA703B 17" LCD MONI 330-00325 Viewsonic VA703B 17" LCD Monitor 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 9,779.42 330-00325 Viewsonic VG2021 m 20" Monitor 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 273.29 Total : 10,435.67 94249 2/15/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2722 INV#07-2722 EDMONDS PD TRANSCRIPTIONS CASE 07-0008 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 411.60 TRANSCRIPTION HANSEN CALL 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 16.80 Total : 428.40 94250 2/15/2007 007253 DUNN LUMBER 09222928 YOST PARK BRIDGE MATERIALS MATERIALS FOR YOST PARK BRIE 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 645.62 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 57.46 Total : 703.08 Page: 12 Packet Page 98 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94251 2/15/2007 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2007160 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - BLDC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - BLDC 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 6,073.55 Total : 6,073.55 94252 2/15/2007 061580 ECKSTROM INDUSTRIES 00038873 c-248 VENTURI THROAT c-248 VENTURI THROAT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 5,798.00 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 498.63 Total : 6,296.63 94253 2/15/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 76408 SUPPLIES UNDERCOAT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.48 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.84 Total : 10.32 94254 2/15/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 9373 UPS/ANALYSIS PLUS UPS/ANALYSIS PLUS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 6.89 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.61 Total : 7.50 94255 2/15/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 149569 INV#149569 CLIENT#308 EDMOND! RIMADYL 75 MG CHEWABLES 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 39.10 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 3.48 150282 INV#150282 CLIENT#3713 EDMON[ EXAM/TREATMENT (NET AFTER CI 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 37.36 Total : 79.94 94256 2/15/2007 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES 350999 YOST PARK BRIDGE SUPPLIES Page: 13 Packet Page 99 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94256 2/15/2007 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES (Continued) SUPPLIES FOR YOST PARK BRIDC 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 910.75 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 78.32 351461 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 75.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.45 Total : 1,070.52 94257 2/15/2007 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU9835 SUPPLIES DISPOSABLE EAR PLUGS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 57.73 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.41 Total : 66.14 94258 2/15/2007 067367 GEO GROUP NORTHWEST INC 5255 Oates. 7400-1 58th Geotech Review Oates. 7400-1 58th Geotech Review 001.000.000.245.900.621.00 1,200.00 Total : 1,200.00 94259 2/15/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9292894897 SUPPLIES TURNBUCKLE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 27.90 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.46 Total : 30.36 94260 2/15/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9286354981 FAC MAINT - SAFETY EYEWEAR Page: 14 Packet Page 100 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94260 2/15/2007 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) FAC MAINT - SAFETY EYEWEAR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 54.30 SAFETY HIGH NOISE EAR MUFFS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 143.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.45 Total : 215.69 94261 2/15/2007 069864 GRAPHIC ENTERPRISES INC AR120144 K&E/8036 CONTRACT OVERAGE C K&E/8036 CONTRACT OVERAGE C 001.000.620.524.100.480.00 24.90 Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.480.00 2.22 Total : 27.12 94262 2/15/2007 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 122527 UNIT 124- BATTERY UNIT 124- BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 83.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.48 Total : 91.44 94263 2/15/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 2126-77 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ALS-fit for duty 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 325.00 OPS-fit for duty 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 136.00 Admin-fit for duty 001.000.510.522.100.410.00 68.00 Prevntn-fit for duty 001.000.510.522.300.410.00 68.00 Total : 597.00 94264 2/15/2007 013315 HIATT, CHUCK BOOT 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE 2007 - C HIATI Page: 15 Packet Page 101 of 313 vchlist 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 16 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94264 2/15/2007 013315 HIATT, CHUCK (Continued) BOOT ALLOWANCE 2007 - C HIATT 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 164.00 Total : 164.00 94265 2/15/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9041661 6035 3225 0095 9949 RAKE/PLYWOOD 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 66.25 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.83 Total : 72.08 94266 2/15/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17304 E6FB.74th/Mdwdle Bch Rd Dr Imps E6FB.74th/Mdwdle Bch Rd Dr Imps 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 2,975.50 17369 E6FB.74th/Mdwdle Bch Rd Drn Impn E6FB.74th/Mdwdle Bch Rd Drn Impn 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,176.00 Total : 4,151.50 94267 2/15/2007 071075 ICC 0184650-07 MIKE SNOOK CERTIFICATION REN MIKE SNOOK CERTIFICATION REN 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 60.00 Total : 60.00 94268 2/15/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 71889516 CANON IMAGE RUNNER 9070 LEA; 250-00135 Canon Image Runner 9070 Lease- 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 971.18 Total : 971.18 94269 2/15/2007 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1606650A INV#1606650A CUST#202924 EDM( Page: 16 Packet Page 102 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94269 2/15/2007 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS (Continued) CANON DR 3080CII SCANNER 001.000.410.521.110.350.00 2,760.00 DOCUMENTUM SERVER LICENSE 001.000.410.521.110.490.00 5,052.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.350.00 245.64 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.490.00 449.63 Total : 8,507.27 94270 2/15/2007 061546 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY 700416 2462 MULTI TIMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 50.10 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 4.90 Total : 60.00 94271 2/15/2007 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 2561685 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEI MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTEI 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 30.00 Total : 30.00 94272 2/15/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE 0429311 SHOP - NUT DRIVER SET SHOP - NUT DRIVER SET 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.39 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.08 0430843 UNIT 719- RAYBESTOS ADV. TEC UNIT 719- RAYBESTOS ADV. TEC 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.17 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.49 Page: 17 Packet Page 103 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 94272 2/15/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE (Continued) 0430844 ill91 61111! 0431524 427147 E,ME1..1 PO # Description/Account Amount UNIT 719 - WIPER BLADES UNIT 719 - WIPER BLADES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.70 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.58 UNIT 719 - BRAKE ROTOR UNIT 719 - BRAKE ROTOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 83.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.47 UNIT 6 - ERASER FOR NP 712 UNIT 6 - ERASER FOR NP 712 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 59.97 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.45 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.91 UNIT 680 - WIPER BLADES, FUEL I. UNIT 680 - WIPER BLADES, FUEL L 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 55.24 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.30 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.48 FLEET RETURNS FLEET RETURNS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -359.90 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -32.03 Page: 18 Packet Page 104 of 313 vchlist 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 19 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94272 2/15/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE (Continued) 432488 UNIT 235 - WIPER BLADES UNIT 235 - WIPER BLADES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 59.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.45 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.83 433174 UNIT 236 - COIL ON PLUG UNIT 236 - COIL ON PLUG 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 43.52 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.87 433677 FLEET SHOP - LIGHTED MAG PICK FLEET SHOP - LIGHTED MAG PICK 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.80 433729 UNIT 239 - WIPER BLADES UNIT 239 - WIPER BLADES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 59.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.85 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.86 Total : 126.43 94273 2/15/2007 015490 K & K CONCRETE PRODUCTS 0025406 STORM DEPT - CEMENT STORM DEPT - CEMENT 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 339.50 PALLET 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 15.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 31.55 Total : 386.05 Page: 19 Packet Page 105 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94274 2/15/2007 016211 KESSELRING GUN SHOP 12101 INV#12101 EDMONDS PD 65 SMITH & WESSON .40 PISTOLS 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 8,940.00 ADDITIONAL MAGAZINES 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 354.84 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 743.59 9733 INV#9733 EDMONDS PD SAFARILAND LH #6360 HOLSTERS 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 436.00 SAFARILAND RH #6360 HOLSTER 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 5,886.00 DOUBLE MAG POUCH 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 1,041.10 UNIVERSAL BELT LOOP 1.5 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 81.25 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 595.55 Total : 18,078.33 94275 2/15/2007 066804 KING CO FIRE TRG OFFICERS ASSN 3877 TRAINING MISC C.Smith ODA tuition 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 2,769.30 Total : 2,769.30 94276 2/15/2007 070152 KING COUNTY 46205 1154 BALLINGER PUMP STATION COST 411.000.655.535.800.510.00 15,271.90 BALLINGER PUMP STATION COST 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 45,268.36 Total : 60,540.26 94277 2/15/2007 067042 KING, DEBORAH KING7506 ETIQUETTE CLASS YOUNG LADIES & GENTLEMEN- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 400.00 Page: 20 Packet Page 106 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94277 2/15/2007 067042 067042 KING, DEBORAH (Continued) Total : 400.00 94278 2/15/2007 071504 KLECKLEY, DARRELL KLECKLEY0213 REFUND REFUND OF SISTER CITY STUDEN 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 94279 2/15/2007 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 314092-001 Repair of survey equipment. Repair of survey equipment. 001.000.620.532.200.480.00 500.00 Lithium backup battery 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 20.00 Misc shop supplies 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 10.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.532.200.480.00 44.50 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 2.67 Total : 577.17 94280 2/15/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1009121328 INV#1009121328 EDMONDS PD BOXES OF EARPLUGS 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 53.80 MAGNUM SAFETY GLASSES 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 19.50 Freight 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 9.62 Total : 82.92 94281 2/15/2007 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN LAMPHERE7968 COOKING CLASS 15 MINUTE MEALS: #7968 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 70.00 Total : 70.00 94282 2/15/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 2007-132 SUPPLIES Page: 21 Packet Page 107 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94282 2/15/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY (Continued) NITRILE GLOVES, EDGER BLADES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 246.48 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.94 Total : 268.42 94283 2/15/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093177 Office Supplies - HR Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 161.00 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 14.33 Total : 175.33 94284 2/15/2007 018900 LYNNWOOD AUTO ELECTRIC 69324 UNIT 26 - ALTERNATOR UNIT 26 - ALTERNATOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 132.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.75 Total : 143.75 94285 2/15/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 511185 UNIT 115 - STT LAMPS UNIT 115 - STT LAMPS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.38 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.17 511190 UNIT 11 -SPLASH GUARDS UNIT 11 - SPLASH GUARDS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.46 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.73 511289 UNIT 717 - PTEX DEFOG TAB UNIT 717 - PTEX DEFOG TAB 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.80 Page: 22 Packet Page 108 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94285 2/15/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 511312 UNIT 477 - AUTO PARTS UNIT 477 - AUTO PARTS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.48 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.64 511381 UNIT 55 - FUEL FILTER UNIT 55 - FUEL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.44 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.11 511430 UNIT 476 - SWITCH UNIT 476 - SWITCH 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 26.69 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.38 511434 UNIT 55 - CONNECTOR, U BOLTS UNIT 55 - CONNECTOR, U BOLTS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.78 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.51 511460 UNIT 94 - SERPENTINE BELT UNIT 94 - SERPENTINE BELT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.12 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.75 511650 UNIT 55 - FITTING UNIT 55 - FITTING 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.01 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.09 511717 UNIT 26 - AIR FILTERS UNIT 26 - AIR FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 46.78 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.16 Page: 23 Packet Page 109 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94285 2/15/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 511733 UNTI 110 - OIL FILTER UNTI 110 - OIL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.39 511776 UNIT 110 - AIR FILTER UNIT 110 - AIR FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.02 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.16 511969 UNIT 68 - OIL FILTER UNIT 68 - OIL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.90 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.53 512068 UNIT 12 - FITTINGS UNIT 12 - FITTINGS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.19 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.19 512221 STATION 20 GEN - TANK HEATER STATION 20 GEN - TANK HEATER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 48.64 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.33 512670 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES - OTC ACC FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES - OTC ACC 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 168.98 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.04 512872 UNIT 79 - BRAKE FLUID DOT UNIT 79 - BRAKE FLUID DOT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.59 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.48 Page: 24 Packet Page 110 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94285 2/15/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 512932 UNIT 11 - HOSE END UNIT 11 - HOSE END 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.54 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.21 512943 UNIT 117 - FUEL FILTER UNIT 117 - FUEL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.22 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.09 513369 UNIT 476 - HYD FIL , BK SUPPORT UNIT 476 - HYD FIL , BK SUPPORT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 73.84 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.57 513451 UNIT 24 - V BELT UNIT 24 - V BELT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.57 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.45 Total : 645.80 94286 2/15/2007 060855 LYNNWOOD TROPHY CENTER 16477 Retirement plaque - R. Michel Retirement plaque - R. Michel 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 32.95 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 2.93 Total : 35.88 94287 2/15/2007 070876 MAROHN, TINA MAROHN7592 MADALA WORKSHOP MANDALA WORKSHOP #7592 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 65.00 Total : 65.00 94288 2/15/2007 065829 MARTINSON, LINDA MARTINSON7579 BELLY DANCE CLASSES Page: 25 Packet Page 111 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94288 2/15/2007 065829 MARTINSON, LINDA (Continued) BELLY DANCE #7579 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 224.00 BELLY DANCE #7574 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 58.80 Total : 282.80 94289 2/15/2007 066719 MCKENZIE & ADAMS INC 0067701 OUTERWEAR CEMETERY SEXTON- 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 70.00 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 6.23 Total : 76.23 94290 2/15/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 58522689 123106800 RETAINING RING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.95 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.10 58760730 123106800 BALL BEARINGS/ROUTER BIT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 88.59 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.78 Total : 101.42 94291 2/15/2007 071487 MED-TECH RESOURCE INC 24942 INV#24942 EDMONDS PD RADIO BATTERIES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 1,241.28 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 12.30 Total : 1,253.58 94292 2/15/2007 069285 MERCER MD, JAMES 1001-007 ALS PROF SERVICES Jan 07 med prgm dir 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,644.75 Page: 26 Packet Page 112 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94292 2/15/2007 069285 069285 MERCER MD, JAMES (Continued) Total : 1,644.75 94293 2/15/2007 070381 MICHEL CONSTRUCTION INC Prk Dsrp Refund Prkng Dsrptn Fee Refund 626 Glen S Prkng Dsrptn Fee Refund 626 Glen S 111.000.000.344.120.000.00 1,139.23 Total : 1,139.23 94294 2/15/2007 020495 MIDWAY PLYWOOD INC C 53335 CITY HALL - SHELVING SUPPLIES CITY HALL - SHELVING SUPPLIES 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 1,091.25 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 97.12 C 53352 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES FAC MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 89.47 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.96 Total : 1,285.80 94295 2/15/2007 071501 MIDWEST SCIENTIFIC INC 0180115-IN INV#0180115-IN CUST#WACITY ED -20C UPRIGHT FREEZERS - PROP[ 001.000.410.521.910.350.00 1,640.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.910.350.00 240.00 Total : 1,880.00 94296 2/15/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 40044 RENTAL RENTALS: LOADER, BUCKET, THE 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 190.00 GAS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.02 Total : 197.02 94297 2/15/2007 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0191383-IN SEWER- JEANS - S MATTHEWS Page: 27 Packet Page 113 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94297 2/15/2007 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC (Continued) SEWER- JEANS - S MATTHEWS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 140.70 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 12.38 Total : 153.08 94298 2/15/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0315136-IN FLEET - EXCHANGE DIFFERANCE FLEET - EXCHANGE DIFFERANCE 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -12.20 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -1.05 0317691-IN FLEET FILTER INVENTORY FLEET FILTER INVENTORY 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 97.53 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 8.39 Total : 92.67 94299 2/15/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1263955.001 2091 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 133.80 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.80 King County Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 12.09 Total : 152.69 94300 2/15/2007 064006 NORTH WEST INSTRUMENT SERVICES 8940 SCALE CERTIFICATION SCALE CERTIFICATION 411.000.656.538.800.410.31 160.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.31 14.24 Total : 174.24 94301 2/15/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0076186 SODIUM BISULFITE Page: 28 Packet Page 114 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94301 2/15/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC (Continued) SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 510.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 45.39 Total : 555.39 94302 2/15/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0418876 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 231.18 Total : 231.18 94303 2/15/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0415249 TRAINING SUPPLIES training honey bucket 001.000.510.522.400.450.00 140.00 Total : 140.00 94304 2/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 033398 Office Supplies - HR Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 121.36 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 10.69 Total : 132.05 94305 2/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 954014 520437 LABELS/MARKERS/COFFEE FILTEI 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 107.11 King County Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 9.43 Total : 116.54 94306 2/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 037695 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 168.35 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 14.81 Page: 29 Packet Page 115 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94306 2/15/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) Total : 183.16 94307 2/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 974738 Supples for Council Office - Supples for Council Office - 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 144.16 Total : 144.16 94308 2/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 944945 INV#944945 ACCT#520437 250POL PRINTER LABELS 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 16.60 COMPOSITION NOTEBOOK 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.75 BANKERS BOXES - ANDERSON 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 28.89 MONITOR STAND 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 21.54 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 1.46 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.70 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 1.90 Total : 74.84 94309 2/15/2007 063588 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS CO 6214819-00 UNIT 476 - LUBE OIL UNIT 476 - LUBE OIL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 131.20 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.73 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.40 Total : 153.33 94310 2/15/2007 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK7500 CHILDREN'S CLASS WIGGLES & GIGGLES #7500 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 382.20 Page: 30 Packet Page 116 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94310 2/15/2007 069944 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH (Continued) Total : 382.20 94311 2/15/2007 063890 PERFORMANCE SIGN PRODUCTS INC 41798 STREET - 24" WINTERGREEN MIN - STREET - 24" WINTERGREEN MIN- 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 17.78 Freight 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.96 Total : 24.74 94312 2/15/2007 070257 POSTINI INC 277134 INTERNET ANTI -VIRUS & SPAM MA Internet Anti -Virus & Spam Maint Fee 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 432.50 Total : 432.50 94313 2/15/2007 068354 POWDER COATING INC B18225 UNIT 124 - MISC PANELS UNIT 124 - MISC PANELS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 186.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.60 Total : 203.07 94314 2/15/2007 069074 PROCESS HEATING COMPANY 71149 STREET - CROSS SIDE LINKS FOR STREET - CROSS SIDE LINKS FOR 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 34.00 Freight 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 9.15 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 3.80 Total : 46.95 94315 2/15/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -Cl 24 hour alarm monitoring-CH- 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00 Total : 35.00 Page: 31 Packet Page 117 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94316 2/15/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANI 0013715-IN EDMCITW GUAZE PADS/BAND AIDS 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 56.25 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 4.73 Total : 60.98 94317 2/15/2007 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 07 200S-1 Q1-2007 Clean Air Assessment per F Q1-2007 Clean Air Assessment per F 001.000.390.531.700.510.00 4,930.50 Total : 4,930.50 94318 2/15/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 5322323139 Fire Station # 16 Fire Station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,054.45 5903085008 FLEET Fleet 7110 210th St SW 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 755.20 Total : 2,809.65 94319 2/15/2007 064291 QWEST 206-z02-0478 332E FLOW METERING STATIONS FLOW METERING STATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.80 Total : 137.80 94320 2/15/2007 070868 RC ZEIGLER COMPANY INC E4LB.Ret Release E4LB.Sr Ctr Elevator Ret Release E4LB.Sr Ctr Elevator Ret Release 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 6,884.90 Total : 6,884.90 94321 2/15/2007 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL 3003745-A STORM - STREET SWEEPING REF STORM - STREET SWEEPING REF 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 2,723.54 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 98.05 Total : 2,821.59 Page: 32 Packet Page 118 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94322 2/15/2007 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0701109 ESMC.Services thru 01/26/07 ESMC.Services thru 01/26/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 16,471.09 Total : 16,471.09 94323 2/15/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9411998533 ASPHALT ASPHALT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.68 Total : 391.68 94324 2/15/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9411943167 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 191.75 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 16.87 9411966703 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 163.15 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 163.15 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.36 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.36 9411987405 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 165.43 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 165.42 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.56 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.56 Page: 33 Packet Page 119 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94324 2/15/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS (Continued) 9412022998 STREET - ASPHALT STREET -ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 254.16 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 22.37 9412033843 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 209.96 9412033846 STREET - ASPHALT STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 210.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 18.48 Total : 1,638.58 94325 2/15/2007 071490 RYBICKI, DANIEL J 2267 ALS PROF SERVICES duty eval 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,012.50 Total : 1,012.50 94326 2/15/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY SAWDON0210 GYM MONITOR ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITC 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 36.00 Total : 36.00 94327 2/15/2007 061482 SEA -WESTERN INC 113242 OPS REPAIRS Gauge guard, valve stem, etc. 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 108.90 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 5.78 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 10.09 Total : 124.77 94328 2/15/2007 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 846828 FLEET INVENTORY - SCREEN ASS Page: 34 Packet Page 120 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 94328 2/15/2007 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC Invoice (Continued) 849003 850135 850474 94329 2/15/2007 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 07-45 54529 PO # Description/Account Amount FLEET INVENTORY - SCREEN ASS 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 107.34 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 9.55 UNIT 235 - SPARK PLUGS UNIT 235 - SPARK PLUGS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 61.28 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.45 UNIT 79 - JOINT KIT UNIT 79 - JOINT KIT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 164.52 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.64 UNIT 79 - FRONT HOSES UNIT 79 - FRONT HOSES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 33.14 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.95 Total : 398.87 UNIT 24 - 2" EXPANSION PLUG UNIT 24 - 2" EXPANSION PLUG 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 45.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.92 UNIT 70 - SS HYPRO PUMP UNIT 70 - SS HYPRO PUMP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 697.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.77 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 64.23 Page: 35 Packet Page 121 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94329 2/15/2007 067076 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT ( (Continued) Total : 854.92 94330 2/15/2007 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 230077 UNIT 467 - MOTOR ASSEMBLY UNIT 467 - MOTOR ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 76.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.83 Total : 83.58 94331 2/15/2007 070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC 75499 SR CENTER GEOTECHNICAL ENGI SR CENTER GEOTECHNICAL ENGI 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 8,377.00 Total : 8,377.00 94332 2/15/2007 036070 SHANNON TOWING INC 187853 INV#187853 EDMONDS PD CASE 01 TOW 98 HONDA CIVIC 181 UXG (W 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 155.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 13.79 Total : 168.79 94333 2/15/2007 068816 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 62020854 EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 223.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 4.90 Total : 227.90 94334 2/15/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0056507-IN UNIT 485 - ALTERNATING FLASHEI UNIT 485 - ALTERNATING FLASHEI 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.50 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.50 Page: 36 Packet Page 122 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94334 2/15/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM (Continued) 0057030-IN UNIT 487 - UNIVERSAL MNT SUPPI UNIT 487 - UNIVERSAL MNT SUPPI 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 110.60 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.18 Total : 180.78 94335 2/15/2007 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 1-580663 UNIT 128 - SUPER Z CHAIN UNIT 128 - SUPER Z CHAIN 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 64.42 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.54 Total : 69.96 94336 2/15/2007 071502 SLENKER, ROBERT 2449 UNIFORM/SLENKER UNIFORM/SLENKER 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 55.99 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 4.82 Total : 60.81 94337 2/15/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL IRRIGATION CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.72 5320018384 SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.23 Total : 60.95 94338 2/15/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 4510017488 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.21 4640017416 TELEMETRY SYSTEM TELEMETRY SYSTEM 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 30.91 Page: 37 Packet Page 123 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94338 2/15/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 6000013000 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 8,414.62 6100013009 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,944.24 6100013306 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 170.07 6200013008 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,814.76 Total : 18,405.81 94339 2/15/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 33611 "MICROFILM" STAMP FOR BLDG. E "MICROFILM" STAMP FOR BLDG. E 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 45.17 Total : 45.17 94340 2/15/2007 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 48062 DUMP CHARGES DUMP CHARGES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 248.06 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 8.94 Total : 257.00 94341 2/15/2007 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2006391 INV#2006391 EDMONDS PD PRISONER R&B DECEMBER 2006 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 42,904.75 2007003 INV#2007003 EDMONDS PD PRISONER R&B JANUARY 2007 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 44,195.38 Total : 87,100.13 94342 2/15/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING Page: 38 Packet Page 124 of 313 vchlist 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 39 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94342 2/15/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40 Total : 24.78 94343 2/15/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4106799-01 STREET - DUCK DUNGAREES - - STREET - DUCK DUNGAREES - - 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 69.20 JEANS 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 136.35 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 18.29 4106857-01 SEWER - WATERPROOF S/T HIKEI SEWER - WATERPROOF S/T HIKEI 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 138.10 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 12.29 Total : 374.23 94344 2/15/2007 031060 STEARNS FINANCIAL SERVICES 7039073-IN RADIX MONTHLY MAINT - MARCH RADIX MONTHLY MAINT - MARCH 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 155.40 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 13.83 Total : 169.23 94345 2/15/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2522671 WATER/SEWER - 1/2" DRIVE PROI Page: 39 Packet Page 125 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 94345 2/15/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC (Continued) 94347 2/15/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10487175 II11LtrSL6S63 PO # Description/Account Amount WATER/SEWER - 1/2" DRIVE PROI 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 72.51 WATER/SEWER - 1/2" DRIVE PROI 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 72.51 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.24 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.23 Total : 157.49 TELEMETRY SYSTEM PROF SVCS TELEMETRY SYSTEM PROF SVCS 412.300.630.594.320.650.00 11,033.75 Total : 11,033.75 SUPPLIES STEEL FENDER WASHERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.42 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.35 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.14 SUPPLIES SCREWS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.89 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.15 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.63 Page: 40 Packet Page 126 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94347 2/15/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) 10493012 SUPPLIES FLAT WASHERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.08 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.15 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.82 Total : 31.63 94348 2/15/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10484954 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 100.54 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.95 10488943 FLEET SHOP TOOLS - HVY DTY RI FLEET SHOP TOOLS - HVY DTY RI 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 441.15 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 39.26 10490822 STREET - NYLON FLAT WASHERS STREET - NYLON FLAT WASHERS 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 43.02 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3.83 Total : 636.75 94349 2/15/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 38372 SEWER - JACKET EMBROIDERY - SEWER - JACKET EMBROIDERY- 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 24.00 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 2.14 Total : 26.14 94350 2/15/2007 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA 000495 INTERNET CONNECTION Page: 41 Packet Page 127 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94350 2/15/2007 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA (Continued) CEMETERY OFFICE INTERNET AC, 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 17.95 Total : 17.95 94351 2/15/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODI SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODI 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.54 425-744-1691 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODE SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEIN 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.89 425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 53.66 425-776-5316 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MC GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MC 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 107.03 Total : 247.12 94352 2/15/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STAT Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at P 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 33.85 425-776-6829 CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 114.80 425-AB9-0530 1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDW 1 st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edward: 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.30 Total : 188.95 94353 2/15/2007 068265 VERIZON ONLINE 83497071 ACCT #8372119 City of Edmonds Internet 02/1-02/28/ 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 667.00 Total : 667.00 94354 2/15/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 269992985-1 425-308-9867 Page: 42 Packet Page 128 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94354 2/15/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) cell phone -water watch 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 35.93 469985965-1 425-870-0617 Cell phone -Jim Waite 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 29.22 Cell phone -Jim Waite 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 29.21 Total : 94.36 94355 2/15/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2112087142 OPS COMMS Air card 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 60.74 Total : 60.74 94356 2/15/2007 064002 VIS SEED COMPANY 4249 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES ASST. PLANTS FOR FLOWER PRO 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 23.35 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 6.95 Total : 30.30 94357 2/15/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 29356203 INV#29356203 CUST#1188339 EDM WEIGHING PAPER - 500 SHEETS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 23.94 Freight 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 9.77 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 3.02 Total : 36.73 94358 2/15/2007 046100 WA ST ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS INC 14088 TRAINING MISC White FT&SO conf 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 500.00 Total : 500.00 94359 2/15/2007 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH PWS ID 22500 U 2007 OPERATING PERMIT FEE - J Page: 43 Packet Page 129 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 94359 2/15/2007 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH (Continued) 2007 OPERATING PERMIT FEE - J 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 5,642.50 2007 SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FEE 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 536.00 Total : 6,178.50 94360 2/15/2007 045517 WACA 06D- DAVIS 2007 WACA MEMBERSHIP - ANGEI 2007 MEMBERSHIP - DAVIS 001.000.410.521.700.490.00 35.00 06D-75 DAWSON 2007 MEMBERSHIP - DEBBIE DAW 2007 WACA MEMBERSHIP 001.000.410.521.700.490.00 35.00 06D-76 LYONS 2007 MEMBERSHIP - LISA LYONS 2007 WACA MEMBERSHIP 001.000.410.521.700.490.00 35.00 Total : 105.00 94361 2/15/2007 064427 WAITE, STEPHEN bId20060094 REFUND ON PROJECT THAT WAS REFUND ON PROJECT THAT WAS 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 3,482.32 Total : 3,482.32 94362 2/15/2007 065374 WASHINGTON DEPT OF CORRECTION: 45-080748 INV#45-080748 CUST#7062 EDMOI` QUALIFICATION TARGETS 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 190.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 16.39 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 16.15 Total : 222.54 94363 2/15/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 106014142 INV#106014142 EDMONDS PD BACKGROUND CHECKS 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 240.00 Total : 240.00 Page: 44 Packet Page 130 of 313 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 02/15/2007 11:39:29AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 94364 2/15/2007 068227 WCFA EDWARDS0207 94365 2/15/2007 070796 WEED GRAAFSTRA & BENSON INC PS 4181-01 M 159 Vouchers for bank code : front 159 Vouchers in this report PO # Description/Account Amount REGISTRATION SPRING TRAINING FOR FUNERAL 130.000.640.536.200.490.00 85.00 Total : 85.00 Professional services - review contras Professional services - review contras 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 92.50 Professional services - review PST 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 92.50 Total : 185.00 Bank total : 541,563.29 Total vouchers : 541,563.29 Page: 45 Packet Page 131 of 313 AM-829 2. D. Claims for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Linda Hynd, City Clerk's Office Submitted For: Sandy Chase Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Lee and Pam McAllister ($1,000.00), Gregg Production Associates ($163,000.00 and continuing), and Dianne Roth Lauer ($3,998.00). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative Claims for Damages have been received from the following: Lee and Pam McAllister 304 8th Avenue North Edmonds, WA. 98020 ($1,000.00) Gregg Production Associates 201 5th Avenue South Edmonds, WA. 98020 ($163,000.00 and continuing) Dianne Roth Lauer 7620 200th SW No. 5 Edmonds, WA. 98026 ($3,998.00) Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: McAllister Claim Link: Gregg Claim Link: Lauer Claim for Damages Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 01:24 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/13/2007 01:26 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 01:32 PM APRV Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 02/05/2007 03:40 PM Final Approval Date: 02/13/2007 Packet Page 132 of 313 V r FEB 0 2 2007 EDMONDS Cry CLERK Date Claim Form Received by ity �1�2 Ple se take note that �/} 1� ,�.1t � (S <�� . who resides at 30 Y i'K o TXM Ou A S� .7 ko 20 mailing address home phone ft 1(7 7y29v S work phone #,/'4 s717_ ?7a his claiming damages against in the sum of $ /,y a arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: �ECE Bf1Z l 3 Z ®D 6 , (( TIME: % , 36 A AIV, LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: !1� �P Rt, t/Cd TfF /" /� T �a y g l'h(� /AJ . DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. A CoVbUA R it0a�C l�SO kAe-L'£_ -- �CZA-r 16-p1� �-1,th00'= 464 UGr et— 4 0IlA `I- f ^ n1/ - e1 i+ ,?ai bD ,. ISCAoA, _ eC A — A_ n r^ /�P — A _ G 3. 'Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? J/ Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: L L _< Tip C r_ /Z�yc LOSE and the policy#: 02 0 i tT S 8 5-5, SE�KIN(� �j000�' Q�d * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Packet Page 133 of 313 * *.NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED I, being first duly swom, -depose and say that. I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to e. .� X X Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washingto County of I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence thJt . p`1GhA426s the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/sl&) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (hislMer) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ignature N( t) RA(_:�Aic t%, �� o'_�j Sk" of wad*vton Title <IJ1W* D. 3WH My appointment expires #APP0WffdMt E "t, 2OD9 WW Packet Page 134 of 313 FROM FAX NO. Jan. 15 2007 02:54PM P1 YOU'ra In good bands. Print Key Output Page 1 5722SS1 V5R3M0 040528 A4000035 01./15/07 14:53:52. Display Device . . . . . : QPADEV0201 User . . . . . . . . . A0 0557 .Insured: LEE A & PAMELA J MCALLISTrR Pol No: 020185855 10/19 Address: 304 8TH AVE N City: EDMONDS State: WA Home: ( 425 ) 717 - 3707 Z-ipcode: 98020 - 3017 Org Year: 88 Agent: 41 63557 Class 2101006 **PRO'ERTY SUMMARY** Status ACTIVE 7OSTINCS Clms: Y Frms: Y Dsc: Y Premium: $606.00+ RENEWAL P EM 101106 $606.00+ Pay Pln: NO PLAN AAP $606.00+ CASH-MORT EDI 101106 $606.00- Nxt Due: $0.00+_ Balance: $0.00+ CASH -MART EDT 040606 $70.00- B11 Act: FOLUP ISSRN Lst B11: $606.00+ CASH,LIST BILL 100705 $512.00- On: 10/2VA.7:,_ Cur Due: $0.00+ REG ENDOR�E 092705 $70.00+ ALL PERILS f $1000f Due On : 10/06/06 RENEWAL P�I22EM 092705 $51.2.00+ Pol Type: DELUXE HOMEOWNERS - PRIMARY RESIDENCE COVERAGES LIMITS PREMIUMS DEDUCTIBLES BASIC COVERAGE 12,000 $24.00 BASIC COVERAGE .�25,000 $550.00 INCREASE LIABILITY AND MEDICAL .300.000 / 1,000 $32,00 REPLACEMENT COST CONTENTS $p 00 BLDG STRUCTURES REIMB EXT LMTS $0_00 (ENTER) CONTINUE (FI) HCLP (F9) VIEW BILL (F10) RESCAN (F3) QUIT (F4) BACK SCREEN LAST R2853,1 Packet Page 135 of 313 Allstate Insurance Company - Claims Payment Processing P.O. Box 481840 , Charlotte, NC 28269 W A n state You're in good hands. LEE A & PAMELA J MCALLISTER 304 8TH AVE N EDMONDS WA 98020-3017 01/22/2007 LEE A & PAMELA J MCALLISTER, ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,323.8f FOR YOUR FOR YOUR WINDSTORM AND HAIL LOSS TO DWELLING ON 12/13/2006 PLEASE REFERENCE CLAIM DETAILS BELOW. CLAIM NUMBER: 0100363811 DATE OF LOSS: 12/13/2006 INSURED: LEE MCALLISTER ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY Packet Page 136 of 313 man 1u ur 11:-rja delfor Usa 206#547#0800 P•1 DATE: TO: COMPANY: FAX: FROM: BELFOR USA GROUP 3826 Woodland Park Avenue North Seattle, NVA 98103 Office: (206) 632-0800 Toll Free: (800) 775-8006 Fax: (206) 547-0800 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET January 10, 2007 Lee McAllister 425-717-7314 .Bill PontiouslShelly Bierman # OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 9 SUBJECT: 'Windstorm repairs Attached, please find our estimate for repairs for the above. If ,you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to call me. Packet Page 137 of 313 Jan 10 07 11z43a Belfor Usa BELFOR 10) BELFOR USA GROUP 206#547#0800 p.2 Belfor Construction Services 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 547-0900 Toll (800) 775-8006 Client: Lee McAlIister Property: 304 - 8th Ave North Edmonds, WA 98020 Operator Info: Operator: SBIERMAN Estimator: Bill Pontious Business: 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Seattle, WA 98103 Company: DIRECT Type of Estimate: Wind Damage Dates: Date Entered: OV08107 Price List: WASE2S7A Restoration/Service/Remodel with Service Charges Factored In Estimate: -NICALLISTER LEE Horne: (425) 774-2908 Business: (425) 717-3707 Cellular: (425) 750-5190 Business: (206) 632-0800 This estimate is to repair darnages caused by a windstorm. Please note that this estimate is based on what can be seen without any tear out. There may be additional damage when the damages are better exposed. Hidden damage or costs including, but not limited to, rot, decay, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, upgrades, permits, fees or other requirements are not included unless specifically mentioned in the text of this bid. These costs, if any, will be identified and documented as soon as possible following discovery.. Packet Page 138 of 313 dan 1U U'/ 11:44a Belfor Usa 206#547#0800 P•8 BELFOR itvf BELFOR USA GROUP Belfor Construction Services 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 547-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 NICALLIST:ER LEE EXTERIOR Room: Roof DESCRIPTION QNTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL Set up for high work 1.00 EA 0.00 550,00 550.00 General Laborer - per hour - to cover and 2.00 HR 0.00 30.80 61.60 protect ground coverings Roofer - per hour - to remove temp cover 4.00 HR 0.00 60.64 and remove shingles to access damage 242.56 R&R Sheathing - plywood - 1/2" CD?s 96.00 SF 0.38 1.18 149.76 FRAMING & ROUGH CARPENTRY - 1.00 EA beam repairs - open to Engineered drawings Open Carpenter - General Framer - per hour - to 8.00 HR 0.00 48.57 388.56 sister truss R&R Fascia - I" x 6" #3 cedar 30.00 LF 0.22 4.10 129.60 R&R Gutter / downspout - aluminum - 6" 40.00 LF 0.33 6.88 288.40 Gutter Installer - per hour - to tie new 2.00 HR D.00 53.02 106.04 gutters into existing downspouts R&R Lanunaled - 30 yr. - comp. shingle rfg 4:00 SQ 59.99 251.33 12245.28 - incl. felt - waiting for roofer to estimate how many squares, maybe additional needed R&R Additional charge for high roof (2 4.00 SQ 3.53 9.51 stories or greater) 52.16 R&R Roof vent - turtle type 1.00 EA 6.00 '18.62 44.62 Ridge cap - composition shingles 25.00 LF 0.00 2.97 74.25 Painter - per hour - to paint soffit & fascia 4.00 IIR 0.00 44.26 177.04 Room Totals: Roof 3,509.87 MCALLISTER LEE 01,11 W2007 Page: 2 Packet Page 139 of 313 BELFOR t*j BE]LFOR USA GROUP Beifor Construction Services 38261ri%oodland Park Ave Forth Tel (206) 632-0900 Fax (206) 547-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 Room: NVEST ELEVATION DESCRIPTION QNTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL R&R Siding - beveled - cedar (clapboard) 75.00 SF 0.29 4.73 370.50 Painter - per hour - to paint new work 8.00 HR 0.00 44.26 354.08 blending into existing Room Totals: WEST ELEVATION 730.58 Room: DECK DESCRIPTION QNTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL Carpenter - General Framer - per hour - to 6.00 HR 0.00 48.57 291.42 remove deck railing Carpenter -General Framer - per hour - to �.00 HR 0.00 48.57 388.56 apply custom flashing Flashing -materials 1.00 EA 0.00 59.00 59.00 Painter - per hour - to paint deck flashing 4,00 HR 0.00 44.26 177.04 916.02 Room Totals: DECK Room: DRIVEWAY DESCRIPTION QNTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL Miscellaneous asphalt - Minimum charge 1:00 EA 0.00 375.00 375.00 — 375.00 Zoom Totals: DRIVEWAY 01i1012007 Page: 3 ,1CALL,ISTER_LEE Packet Page 140 of 313 ` .,an lu U-t 11:44a Belf'or Usa 206#547#0800 P.5 BELFOR f 9j BELFOR USA GROUP Belfor Construction Services 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 547-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 Area Items Total: EXTERIOR 5,531.47 Room: UPSTAIRS OFFICE Subroom 1: CLOSET 638.94 SF Walls 150.58 SF Floor 204.64 SF Long Wall DESCRIPTION INTERIOR 150.58 SF Ceiling 16.73 SY Flooring 114.83 SF Short Wall Q-'TY REMOVE LxWxH 117' x 10'8" x 8'10" LxWxH 117" x 2'4" x 8110" 789.53 SF Walls & Ceiling 72.33 LF Floor Perimeter 72.33 LF Ceil. Perimeter REPLACE TOTAI Content \2anipulation charge - per hour 4.00 HR 0.00 30.80 Mask wall -plastic, paper; tape (per LF) - 72.33 LF 0.00 0.93 123.20 for drywall repairs 67,27 Drytvall Installer / Finisher - per hour - to 2.00 HR 0.00 61.76 cut out section of drywall 123.52 Drywall repair - Minimum charge 1.00 Elk 0.00 490.00 490.00 Insulation - Minimum charge 1.00 EA 0.00 180.00 180.00 Sea] then paint the walls and ceiling (2 789.53 SF 0.00 0.66 521.09 coats) Room Totals: UPSTAIRS OFFICE 1,505 08 MCALLISTER LEE 0 U 10, 2007 Page: 4 Packet Page 141 of 313 jan lU u'r 11:44a Belfor Usa 206#547#0800 P•8 BELFOR (0) BELFOR USA GROUP Belfor Construction Services 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 547-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 Room: BASEMENT KITCHEN DESCRIPTION QNTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL Siding Installer - per hour - to remove and 4.00 HR 0.00 53.02 212.08 reset siding for window replacement R&R Vinyl window - Garden, 10-12 sf 1.00 EA 15.08 773.44 788.52 Painter - per hour - to touch up siding and 4.00 HR 0.00 44.26 177.04 caulk window Room Totals: BASEMENT KITCHEN 1,177,64 Area Items Total: INTERIOR 2,682.72 Room: GENERAL DESCRIPTION QNTY REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL General Laborer - for material cartage, 1.00 EA 0.00 675.00 675.00 debris removal, clean up and dump fees Architectural/Drafting fees (Bid item) - if I. DO EA By Others required by the City Taxes, insurance, permits & fees (Bid item) 1.00 EA 0.00 550.00 550.00 - budget allowance Room Totals: GENERAL L,225.00 Line Item Totals: MCALLISTER^LEE 9 439 19 -MCALLISTER LEE 01/10/2007 .Page: 5 Packet Page 142 of 313 Jan 1U U'/ 11:44a Belfor Usa BELFOR 008" BELFOR USA GROUP Belfor Construction Services 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 547-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 Grated Total Areas: 638.94 SF Walls 150.58 SF Floor 204.64 SF Lon<� Wall 0.00 Floor Area 0.00 Exterior Wall Area 0.00 Surface Area 0.00 Total Ridge Length MCALLISTER LEE 150.58 SF Ceiling 16.73 SY Flooring 114.83 SF Short Wall 0.00 Total Area 0.00 Exterior Perimeter of Walls 0.00 Number of Squares 0.00 Total Hip Length 206#547#0800 p.7 789.53 SF Walls & Ceiling 72.33 LF Floor Perimeter 72.33 LF Ceil. Perimeter 0.00 Interior Wall Area 0.00 Total Perimeter Length 0.00 Area of Face 1 01/10/2007 Page: 6 Packet Page 143 of 313 jan lu U'r 11 z 45a Belfor Usa BELFOR ®� BELF®R USA GROUP Belfor Construction Seiwices 3826 Woodland Park Ave 'North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 547-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 Line Item Total Overhead Profit Sales Tax Grand Total MCALLISTER LEE 206#547#0800 p,a Summary for Whid Damage 9,439.19 @ 10.0% x 9,439.19 943.92 @ 10.0% x 9,439.19 943.92 @ 8.900% x 11,327.03 996.78 Bill Pontious 12,323.81 01/10/2007 Page: Packet Page 144 of 313 -a of Lu ur II:'i�Da Belforllsa BELFOR 9®.1 BELFOY2 USA GROUP Belf'or Constructiozi Services 3826 Woodland Park Ave North Tel (206) 632-0800 Fax (206) 54 7-0800 Toll (800) 775-8006 O&P Items CONCRETE & ASPHALT CONTENT IVIANIPC;LATION GENERAL DEMOLITION DRYWALL PERMITS AND FEES FRAMING & ROUGH CARPENTRY INSULATION LABOR ONLY PAINTING ROOFING SCAFFOLDING SIDING SOFFIT, FASCIA, & GUTTER NVINDOWS - VINYL Subtotal Overhead Profit O&P Items Subtotal Sales Tax Grand Total VICALLISTER LEE Recap By Category 206#547#0800 Total Dollars 375.00 3.04% 123.20 1.00% 353.19 2.87% 680.79 5.52 % 550.00 4.46% 1,127.54 9.15% 180.00 1.46% 736.60 5.98% 1:406.29 11.411/6 1,512.07 12.27% 550.00 4.46% 566.83 4.60% 504.24 4.09% 773.44 6.280/6 9,439.19 76.59% @ 10.00% 943.92 7.66% @ 10.00% 943.92 7.66% 11,327.03 91.91% @ 8.800% 996.78 8.09% 1232381 01i10`2007 Pace: 8 Packet Page 145 of 313 }1 a Tt OR Wf4r �tiNt �,t1,r"fA.r�a�56i5 � >w�n� `� y?�kat d `�. �t n t ({ �'�•(r l� ,.t^' .1 � may„ � Q k�� 0 a r s 1 '�' j,`{t h #,j t7• ,1 t t, 1 r ri „4 < �i :.a � 1 ll i�t� Y r -,IT 7 { + �+�� .� 1 �F }{._ A ;:1 �lt� ��1 � 1�^5��'' t+ 9♦R1'Y.� �' � i � lit Va f . r �.,. i riwi2 77,- - � � � \; ftE i CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVED CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Dat elclgrc j 5 2007 f Please take note that Gregg Production Associates, Inc. who resides at CLERK t mailing address 201 Fifth Avenue S. , Edmonds. . //`p WA 98020 home phone # work phone # 425-673-4218 is claiming damages against City of Edmonds in the sum of $ 163 , 000* arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: January 5,2007 *and continuing TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 201 Fifth Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020 DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. See Exhibit A Complaint for Award of Money Damages attached hereto and by this reference (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. Robert Appleby, 51 West Dayton, Edmonds, WA 98020 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes . X No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: N/A and the policy M * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: * *NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED* Robert Gregg being first duly swom, depose and,say that.) am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. . �J �•Cl/� X X Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington/ j Countyof..5/' 45>//p199/.S/( -y� yn I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 'KEG r/ K �� is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/ k signed this instrument and acknowledged Wtv be (his/fS free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrumen Dated: .z APP fi Signature Title My appointment expires"-' xpires ': pt/S��G •oi 01 4 Wt►5,�� Packet Page 149 of 313 STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day of February, 2007, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared Robert Gregg, personally known to me (or proved to me on the. basis of satisfactory evidence) to. be the person who executed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the. instrument,. and acknowledged it as the President of Gregg Production Associates, Inc. to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. `�� • pPP(FB `�`Q••,��;��w"#0`�a �'% NOTARY PUBLICin and for the. State of Washington, residing at re--sf My appointment eVires PtJ18UG •' a .- Print Name 7 �= �'�i fir.% • ••�4;01•'1�Q��\'� . /OF tW;Ps�\\\�� Packet Page 150 of 313 EXHIBIT A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ., IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH GREGG PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC., a Washington Corporation, 01163 Plaintiff, SUMMONS 0 CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, Defendant. TO THE DEFENDANT: A lawsuit has been started against you in the above -entitled Court by Gregg Production Associates, Inc. Plaintiff s claim is stated in the written Complaint For Award of Money Damages, a copy of which is served upon you with this summons. In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the Complaint by stating your defense in writing, and serve a copy upon the undersigned attorney for the Plaintiff within 20 days after the service of this summons, excluding the day of service, or a default judgment may be entered against you without notice. A default judgment is one where Plaintiff is entitled to what it asks for because you have not responded. If you serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned attorney, you are entitled to notice before a default judgment may be entered. You may demand that the Plaintiff file this lawsuit with the Court. If you do so, the demand must be in writing and must be served upon the Plaintiff. Within 14 days after you serve SUMMONS — 1 SEA 1944181vl 0083160-000001 Seattle Packet Page 151 of 313 N'1*JrA Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES 2600 Century Square - 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 • Fax:(206) 628-7699 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21' 22 23 24 25 26 27 the demand, the Plaintiff must file this lawsuit with the Court, or the service on you of this summons and complaint will be void. If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly so that your written response, if any, may be served on time. This summons is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Superior Court Civil Rules of the State of Washington. DATED this first day of February, 2007. SUMMONS — 2 SEA 1944181v1 0083160-000001 Seattle Packet Page 152 of 313 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Attorneys for Petitioners ) �` By `,,, Dennis D. Reynold WSBA #04762 Alan S. Middleton WSBA #18118 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 • Fax:(206) 628-7699 1 2 3 a 5 6 7 8 9 10, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH GREGG PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC., a) Washington corporation, ) No. Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, ) Defendant. ) Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned counsel, allege as follows: I. PARTIES 1.1 Plaintiff Gregg Production Associates, Inc. is the owner of real property located in the City of Edmonds for which Plaintiff filed an application for design review approval. 1.2 Defendant City of Edmonds is a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Washington. The City has created an Architectural Design Board ("ABD"), with authority to review and approve applications for design review. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2.1 This Court has jurisdiction over this controversy pursuant to RCW 2.08.010, et seq. (superior court jurisdiction). COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF M E AGE - 1 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 153 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 629-7699 2.2 Venue is proper under Chapter 4.12, RCW. 2.3 Plaintiff has exhausted all available administrative remedies including pursuing and seeking the required design review approval to develop its property. 2.4 Issuance to Plaintiff of a design review is an "act" within the meaning of Chapter 64.40, RCW, invoking a claim under that law. That act establishes the period of claimed damages based upon the City's illegal actions set out herein in this Complaint as to the required design review approval, including the City's refusal to issue such approval which is a prerequisite to proceeding to improve, occupy, and lease Plaintiff's property. III. FACTS 3.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the allegations set forth in Parts I and II hereof of its Complaint. 3.2 Plaintiff Gregg Production Associates, Inc. is the owner of the property at 201 Fifth Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020, for which it sought design review approval. 3.3 The proposed project consists of the refurbishment or remodel of a set of two-story commercial buildings with historic character in downtown Edmonds known as "Old Milltown" (the "Project"). Old Milltown was first built in 1910 and substantially remodeled in or around 1978. The currently proposed remodel and addition is so small that it does not exceed Edmonds's threshold for minor projects. The remodel includes a minor addition in between two existing sections of the buildings on the second floor. The remodel and addition do not materially increase the footprint of the existing buildings. 3.4 The proposed refurbishment returns much of Old Milltown's original character. Specifically, two faux Victorian style bay windows that were added in the COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 2 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square • I5o1 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-I688 Packet Page 154 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 1970s are to be removed and the original poured -in -place concrete walls are to be restored. The original style large windows, with transom windows on top, will be installed where the original windows were located and have since been bricked over. Further, the fagades are broken up by new windows and doors and awnings, in addition to variations in building material used on the exterior. Windows are used and arranged in such a way to allow light and air to the occupants of the Project. Different styles of windows are used to add variety to the fagades, but are used in such a manner to add symmetry and balance to a facade. There are planter boxes on the street level to allow for landscaping, while still enhancing the pedestrian experience on the street level. The proposed design provides for modulations of the facade and roofline and does not result in a long, massive, unbroken, or monotonous building. 3.5 Plaintiff proposes to add 3,434 square feet of additional floor area to Old Milltown, on the Fifth Avenue side, by creating an additional story, together with seven parking spaces. The remodel and addition does not increase the length of the two buildings, which stays the same. 3.6 The site of the property is in the City's Community Business (BC) Zone and the proposal complies with all BC use and bulk regulations. Zoning compliance is not an issue in this case. The BC Zone not only allows, but encourages buildings to be built to the property line to enhance the continuous pedestrian retail appearance. There are numerous other buildings in this Zone that are as long or longer than the Old Milltown Building remodel. 3.7 Plaintiff submitted its land use application to the City of Edmonds on July 13, 2006, for "renovation and minor expansion of existing Old Milltown property." COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 3 Davis Wright LAW OFFICES Tremne LLP SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 155 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 629-7699 3.8 On July 14, 2006, the City's Planning Division accepted the application and started the permitting process. 3.9 On August 31, 2006, the Planning Division issued its "Advisory Report and Recommendations" for the application. The Planning Division concluded that the project complied with the BC bulk standards, the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Development Code for the City, except that the Planning Division requested that the applicant provide seven instead of six additional parking stalls as part of the Project. The Planning Division recommended that the ADB approve the application with the following conditions: the applicant meet all other applicable City codes; the applicant provide a final planting plan with their building permit application; and that the awning along Fifth Avenue South be designed to provide weather protection for pedestrians by extending a minimum of six feet over the sidewalk. 3.10 The ADB convened a public hearing on September 6, 2006, to consider GPA Inc.'s application for "design review approval," which consisted of a determination as to whether the application is consistent with the Design Review Criteria in Edmonds Community Development Code ("ECDC"), Chapter 20.10, and is consistent with the Urban Design Guidelines for the "Downtown Activity Center — Pedestrian Oriented Commercial." 3.11 At its September 6 public hearing, the ADB heard from City Senior Planner Steve Bullock, a professional architect and designer from Bridge Architects, Inc., a representative of GPA, Inc., as well as members of the public, including Ms. Elisabeth Larman, who read a letter into the record, and Mr. Roger Hertrich. Anyone asking to be heard was allowed to speak. At the end of the public hearing, the ADB approved COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 4 Davis Wright LAW OFFFICESFICTreES a LLP SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 156 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-9699 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19' 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff's application, subject to the same conditions recommended by the Planning Division. 3.12 On September 20, 2006, Elisabeth Larman filed a page and a half appeal letter with the City, asking that the City Council review the ADB's decision of approval regarding "the proposed changes to the exterior of this landmark building." Significantly, Ms. Larman's appeal challenged the Project's compliance with two of the Urban Design Guidelines: UDG, page 23, (1)(2): "[s]ensitive to the presence of historic buildings and landmarks" and "[c]ompatible with its surroundings." UDG, page 25, (C)(D): "building should avoid long unbroken roofs and wall lines ... that the corners should be accented." Ms. Larman did not challenge the Project on the basis of compliance with ECDC 20.10.070(A)(4), which was later cited by the City Council as the basis for granting the appeal and denial of the Project. 3.13 On October 13, 2006, the Planning Division submitted its analysis to the City Council, addressing the issues raised by Ms. Larman's appeal, and recommended that the City Council "deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the ADB." 3.14 The City Council conducted a closed record review of the Larman appeal at its meeting of October 17, 2006, allowing only the parties of record to speak. Ms. Larman and Mr. Hertrich spoke, expanding the discussion beyond the elements alleged in Ms. Larman's September 20, 2006 appeal. At the conclusion of the discussion, the City Council neither upheld nor denied the appeal; instead, it remanded the Project back to the ADB "for a more intensive review." COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 5 SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 Packet Page 157 of 313 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 3.15 On November 9, 2006, the President of the Edmonds City Council approved a document containing the "procedural history," "findings," "conclusions," and "decision" of the City Council. The remand requested, among other things, that the ADB provide citations to the record for its basis for the Board's determinations. The remand stated that "no new evidence shall be taken by the Board, no new parties admitted, and no additional arguments shall be received." It also stated that "[n]o new open record hearing shall be held by the Architectural Design Board and the Council, and closed record review before the City Council has been closed." 3.16 The ADB held a special meeting on November 30, 2006, to consider the remand from the City Council. The ADB reviewed compliance with the applicable Design Criteria in ECDC 20.10.070 and the Urban Design Criteria in excruciating detail. The ADB again approved the application by a 3-1 vote of the Board, with the following minor changes to the original conditions of approval: 1. That the parapet of the northeast portion of the building be elevated proportional to the grade difference at the northeast corner of the building and that reveal patterns be provided similar in scale to the concrete framing on the existing northwest side commonly referred to as the Yost Building. 2. That the proposed awnings on the building extend a minimum of six feet from the face of the building. ADB Findings and Conclusions, November 30, 2006. The ADP then forwarded to the City Council its revised Findings and Conclusions for Application ADB-2006-94. COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 6 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 158 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 629-7699 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3.17 The Planning Division, on December 7, 2006, submitted its recommendation to the City Council to "uphold the Findings of the ADB approving ADB-2006-94 with the proposed conditions." 3.18 At its December 12, 2006, meeting to consider the ADB's November 30, 2006, Findings and Conclusions, the Edmonds City Council, by a 4-3 vote, directed the City Attorney "to prepare findings of fact to affirm the appeal and reverse the Findings of the Architectural Design Board based on failure to meet the criteria in ECDC § 20.10.070 with regard to long, massive, unbroken and monotonous buildings." 3.19 On January 5, 2007, the Mayor signed the written decision of the City Council, adopting the findings and conclusions of the ADB as entered on November 30, 2006, "with the exception of the Board's finding regarding Guideline 4(b)(2)." The City Council's decision upheld the appeal and denied Plaintiff's application for design review approval. 3.1 In place of the Board's finding, the City Council finds that the structure fails to comply with the requirements of Edmonds Community Development Code ("ECDC") 20.10.070(A)(4), requiring the avoidance of "long, massive, unbroken or monotonous building" as such requirement is explicated by Design Guideline 4(b)(2). 3.1.1 In specific, the Council finds that criteria 4(b)(2)(c) regarding shapes and forms is not met in that the proposed remodel of the building has a long, unbroken roof and wall line. The design fills in gaps and breaks in the existing walls and removes bay windows, all of which provided visual interest. 3.1.2 The Council finds that the design fails to satisfy Design Criteria 4(b)(2)(d) in that the design does not avoid "large, massive walls." The design does not modulate the walls and the structure presents large, unbroken blank expanses on both the Dayton and Fifth, Avenue streetscapes. COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 7 Davis Wright LAW OFFFICESFJCTreES a LLP SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 159 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Decision, pp. 4-5. 3.20 On January 25, 2007, Plaintiff filed an appeal under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C, RCW, Snohomish County Cause No. 07-2-02086-0, alleging that the City in denying its application for design review approval engaged in unlawful procedures and failed to follow a prescribed process under RCW 36.70C.130(1)(a), acted on an erroneous interpretation of the law under RCW 36.70C.130(1)(b), made and relied on factual findings and conclusions that are not supported by substantial evidence in the record and are contrary to the record under RCW 36.70C.130(1)(c), made a clearly erroneous application of the law to the facts under RCW 36.70C.130(1)(d), and violated Plaintiff s constitutional rights under RCW 36.70C.130(1)(f) (the "Land Use Appeal") 3.21 The City Council engaged in unlawful procedures and failed to follow a prescribed process by substituting its judgment for the finder of fact, in this case the ADB, instead of acting in an appellate capacity. The City Council also engaged in unlawful procedures and failed to follow a prescribed process by applying the wrong standard of review to the decision by the ADB. Specifically, the City Council engaged in unlawful procedures and failed to follow a prescribed process by allowing the appellant to expand the issues presented at Council beyond the issues raised in her September 20, 2006 appeal to the Council and by making its Decision on the basis of an issue not raised by the appeal from the ADB. Under the law, the City Council in a quasi-judicial proceeding must interpret and apply existing law to particular facts. See e.g., Chaussee v. Snohomish County Council, 38 Wn. App. 630, 689 P.2d 1084 (1984). 3.22 The City Council in its Decision erroneously interpreted the Design Review Criteria in ECDC § 20.10.070(A)(4), which provides: COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 8 SEA 19441010 0083160-000001 Packet Page 160 of 313 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 1 2 3 4 5 G'7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter to allow light and air to occupants of the development and to provide space for landscaping and recreational facilities. In addition, the City Council's application of the criteria to the facts in the ADB record is clearly erroneous. The Council's denial contains no showing whatsoever as to how the Project "fails to allow light and air to occupants of the development." By failing to interpret and follow the law as written, the City Council engaged in an unlawful procedure and failed to follow a prescribed process in violation of the rights and Plaintiff's fundamental right to use and develop private and to be free of arbitrary decision -making. 3.23 The City Council erroneously relied on guidelines that are not part of the City's development code, specifically Urban Design Guideline 4(b)(2). The City's denial was erroneous, and its application to the facts in the ADB record clearly erroneous. 3.24 City Design Criteria in ECDC § 20.10.070(A)(4) regarding the avoidance of "long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings" and Urban Design Guideline 4(b)(2), to the extent it is even applicable, are so vague as to be unconstitutional on their face and as applied to the facts of this case because they contain no ascertainable standard by which the Petitioner can understand the requirements or by which the City can objectively apply these requirements. See Anderson v. Issaquah, 70 Wn. App. 64, 851 P.2d 744 (1993). The City's denial violates Plaintiffs constitutional rights. 3.25 Finding 3.1 in the City Council's denial is unsupported by evidence that is substantial when viewed in light of the whole record. It is also inconsistent with and in conflict with findings and conclusions made by the ADB and adopted by the City Council in its Decision. By entering a finding that is unsupported by substantial evidence and inconsistent with and in conflict with adopted findings and conclusions, the City erred and COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 9 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES SEA 1944101vi 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square - 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 161 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 its denial violates the law and infringes on Plaintiff's fundamental right to use and develop its property. 3.26 Community displeasure cannot be a basis for denial of a land use permit. Marantha Mining, Inc. v. Pierce County, 59 Wn. App. 795, 801 P.2d 985 (1990). Generalized complaints of citizens do not control over expert testimony. 59 Wn. App. 795 at 804. However, the City illegally allowed citizens' views to control. When doing so, the City Council acted contrary to law and arbitrarily when it relied upon citizen testimony to conclude that the Petitioner had not complied with ECDC 20.10.070(A)(4) and Urban Design Guidelines 4(b)(2)(c) and (d) of the City. IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION —CHAPTER 64.40, RCW 4.1 Plaintiff incorporates the allegations set forth in Parts I through III, above, of its Complaint. 4.2 Plaintiff is the owner of a property interest who has filed applications for permits as defined by Chapter 64.40, RCW. 4.3 The City's attempt to place unlawful conditions and limitations upon use of real property in excess of those allowed by applicable regulations has caused unnecessary delay and monetary damage to Plaintiffs in violation of RCW 64.40.020. 4.4 The City need not have knowledge of the unlawfulness of its acts in order to be liable under statute for its arbitrary and capricious denial of a property owner's application for permit. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County, 119 Wn.2d 91, 829 P.2d 746 (1992). However, in this instance, the City knew or should have known of the unlawfulness of its actions. COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 10 Davis Wright LAW OFFFICESFICTreES a LLP SEA 1944101v 10083160-000001 2600 Century Square • lsol Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1689 Packet Page 162 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 4.5 The City's conduct was illegal and/or arbitrary and capricious, because a permit or land use approval such as the design review approval may not be withheld at the discretion of local officials if the applicant has satisfied all ordinance and statutory criteria, and if the local government withholds such approval on such basis it acts illegally and must pay money damages. Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of Spokane, 134 Wn.2d 947, 961-62, 954 P.2d 250 (1998). 4.6 The City is liable to Plaintiffs for damages in connection with its refusal to issue a design review approval, because Plaintiff complied with the City's requirements and the City knew or should have known its conduct was unlawful. See Cox v. City of Lynnwood, 72 Wn. App. 1, 863 P.2d 578 (1993). 4.7 The City acted without lawful authority and unreasonably and in willful disregard of Plaintiff's lawful entitlements by refusing to approve or release Plaintiff's requested design review approval. 4.8 The City's illegal and/or arbitrary actions set out above have proximately caused Plaintiff substantial damage, including excessive carrying costs, project management fees, and lost lease revenues. Presently, the two buildings comprising the Project are empty and cannot be occupied and leased until a design approval is issued and the buildings remodeled. 4.9 Pursuant to RCW 64.40.020(2), the prevailing party in an action brought under Chapter 64.40, RCW may be awarded reasonable costs and attorneys' fees for arbitrary, capricious, or unlawful actions in reviewing land use applications. COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 11 Davis WrightLAW OFFFICESFICTreES a LLP SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square - 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 163 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 V. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION —INVERSE CONDEMNATION 5.1 Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in Parts I through IV, above, of its Complaint. 5.2 The actions of the City in denying the requested design review approval without lawful or just cause, resulting in a loss of 3,434 square feet of newly created building space, permanently damaging Plaintiff's protected property interests without just compensation having first been paid as required by Art. I, § 16 of the Washington Constitution. VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as follows: A. For judgment against the City for monetary damages in an amount to be established at trial as a result of the City's unlawful refusal to timely issue a design review, presently at least $160,000 and continuing, including but not limited to recovery of its reasonable expenses and losses, including costs associated with unnecessary but continuing carrying costs, including interest, lost lease profits, increased costs, and associated inordinate delay and other elements of damage pursuant to RCW 7.16.260 and RCW 64.40.020, including permanent loss of use of the property caused by the denial of approval to expand the usable space in the to be remodeled buildings. B. For judgment against the City for Plaintiff's costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to RCW 4.84.350, RCW 7.16.260, and/or RCW 64.40.020. COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 12 Davis Wright LAW OFFFICESFICTreES a LLP SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square - 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 164 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 DATED this / day of February, 2007. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff By % �'Q."-Z&— Dennis D. Reyn lds, WSBA #4762 Alan S. Middleton, WSBA #18118 COMPLAINT FOR AWARD OF MONEY DAMAGES - 13 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP LAW OFFICES SEA 1944101v1 0083160-000001 2600 Century Square • 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Packet Page 165 of 313 (206) 622-3150 • Fax: (206) 628-7699 EXHIBIT "B" DAMAGES CALCULATIONS Interest payments over 4 months ....................................... Management fees over 4 months ...................................... Permanent loss of use of 196 s.f. of space @ $300/s.f.............. $74,200.00 $30,000.00 $58,800.00 TOTAL CLAIM ........................................................ $163,000.00* * This total does not reflect attorneys fees and costs required to bring this action. Documentl Packet Page 166 of 313 i`LI�Ll V Lll FEB 14 2007 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM ED foNDS MY C RK Date Claim Form L+ 1VI 1V1JJ 11 I J�I3j�j1 eceived by City Please lake _note that / %2 - �e44/eP-who resides at 710 ��ow�s EbA-k Z//� ' S mailing address 'Sc?-n- � home phone # 67� mork phone # 7 71o.Za// is claiming damages against in the sum of $ � ! 9 Qn h arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF O U RENCE: � Z: , Z ge-% 6,/ TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: Lrb '� S%. Al 2) a DESCRIPTION: 1. Descrft occurrence explaining the nat re of the defects or acts of negligence causi g damages. 1�'' �— ems_ (aftacyUn extra sheet for naJ inf®atiork if did) 2. Provide a list ol witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, a resseand ho e�nymbers. �✓h v rfle rne�� LS e :mot t. e) 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? ---yes _ If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: �� P✓!C� 9/ S ! 14e nld, and the policy M. * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR.AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * License Plate # Type Auto: (year) (make) DRIVER: Address: Driver License # (model) _ OWNER: Address: i n.bs F-bek; beAl . No �w Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED* O I, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the a ove claim, know the contents thereof and believe the say e be true. 0 X X State of Washington Signature of Claimant(s) County of 5A,Dr�Drn 1 I certify that.] know or have satisfactory evidence thatD 1� � � � h � )dis the L before person who appeared me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument: / Signature a 0L 0 A &) =_�'�`•„�NCa 'f Title /J o '7 ,4,z y Ci Q `! G My i d.� 41P appointment expires �O ' oL or Packet Page 167 of 313 AM-838 Stormwater Engineering Program Manager Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For: Dave Gebert Department: Engineering Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Time: Type: Consent Action 2.E. Subiect Title Ratification of employment offer to Stormwater Engineering Program Manager. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council ratify the employment offer for the selected Stormwater Engineering Program Manager applicant to include starting vacation accrual of 21 days per year. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The City posted a recruitment announcement for our Stormwater Engineer position in July 2006. After three months of recruitment, we only received two applications that appeared to be qualified enough for interview. A selection panel interviewed the two applicants and determined that one was not qualified. The other candidate was offered the position, but declined because she wanted to work only part time, and we need a full time employee. Based upon the above, the job description was revised, and the recruitment was re -advertised. The title was changed to Stormwater Engineering Program Manager and the requirement for a bachelor's degree in engineering or professional engineer's license was changed to "preferred but not required", with the salary capped at 5% below the top of the range if the incumbent does not have an engineering degree or PE license. Subsequently, two additional applications were received that appeared qualified. The same selection panel interviewed the applicants and selected the best qualified of the applicants. On February 6, 2007, the Stormwater Engineering Program Manager position was offered to the applicant selected by the panel. That applicant has accepted the City's offer subject to starting with vacation accrual of 21 days per year. Please see the additional information attached. In accordance with Edmonds City Code (ECC) 2.35.030.A.2, non -represented employees below the level of division manager (which this position is) accrue 11 days vacation per year for the first 5 years of employment with the City, 16 days for years 6 through 11, and 21 days for years 12 through 19. However, ECC 2.35.090.13 authorizes the Mayor, when he believes it is necessary to attract persons with experience at comparable public agencies, to extend offers to such individuals which provide for benefits, such as vacation accrual, greater than those to which an entry-level employee would be entitled. Such employment offers must be ratified by the City Council. The selected applicant has been employed by Snohomish County for approximately 15 years, and indicated that he presently earns 22.5 days vacation per year. He has been determined by the selection panel to be very well qualified for the position. During the majority of his career at Snohomish County, his duties and responsibilities have been very similar to those of our Stormwater Engineering Program Manager position. It is considered reasonable to offer the selected applicant vacation accrual comparable to the vacation accrual he now receives as an employee of Snohomish County based upon his experience and years of government service. As noted above, he has worked for Snohomish County for approximately 15 years. A non -represented City employee below the level of division manager who has worked for the City for more than 12 years accrues 21 days of vacation per year. The Mayor has authorized an employment offer to be extended to the selected applicant to include starting vacation accrual of 21 days per year, and such an offer has been extended and accepted. Please see attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Storm 21-Day Vacation Reauest Packet Page 168 of 313 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 02/12/2007 10:56 AM APRV 2 Personnel Debi Humann 02/15/2007 02:26 PM APRV 3 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/15/2007 02:47 PM APRV 4 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/15/2007 02:47 PM APRV 5 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:53 PM APRV 6 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 03:13 PM APRV 7 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 03:14 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 02/12/2007 08:08 AM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 169 of 313 MEMORANDUM Date: February 7, 2007 To: Mayor Haakenson CC: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Debi Humann, Human Resources Manager s From: Dave Gebert, City Engineer ��,, „ s Subject: Stormwater Engineering Program Manager, Request for Approval of 21 days Vacation Accrual Attachment: ECC 2.35.030.A.2 and 2.35.090.B The City posted a recruitment announcement for our Stormwater Engineer position in July 2006. After three months of recruitment, we only received two applications that appeared to be qualified enough for interview. A panel consisting of Noel Miller, Jim Kammerer, Don Fiene and Dave Gebert, interviewed the two applicants. After interviewing them, one applicant was determined not to be qualified. The other candidate was offered the position, but declined because she wanted to work only part time, and we need a full time employee. Based upon the above, the job description was revised, and the recruitment was readvertised. The title was changed to Stormwater Engineering Program Manager and the requirement for a bachelor's degree in engineering or professional engineer's license was changed to "preferred but not required", with the salary capped at 5% below the top of the range if the incumbent does not have an engineering degree or PE license. Subsequently, two additional applications were received that appeared qualified. On January 30 and February 1, 2007, the same panel interviewed the applicants. After interviewing Mr. Blaine Chesterfield, the panel unanimously concluded that he appears to be well qualified and should be offered the Stormwater Engineering Program Manager position. Mr. Chesterfield has been employed by Snohomish County since 1992, and has steadily progressed from Engineering Technician to Engineer 1. During the majority of his career at Snohomish County, his duties and responsibilities have been very similar to those of our City of Edmonds Packet Page 170 of 313 Development Services Department Engineering Division Stormwater Engineering Program Manager position. He has a broad base of experience in hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, drainage problem investigation and resolution, drainage project design, cost estimating, construction contract inspection, citizen contact and public education, and customer service. Mr. Chesterfield was articulate and expressed himself well during the interview and indicated to the panel that he has considerable experience dealing with the public and responding to citizen inquiries and complaints. Mr. Chesterfield's references that were contacted highly recommended him for our Stormwater Engineering Program Manager position. On February 6, 2007, I offered the Stormwater Engineering Program Manager position to Mr. Chesterfield. Mr. Chesterfield has conditionally accepted the position, subject to his starting vacation accrual being 21 days per year. Mr. Chesterfield indicated that he presently accrues 22.5 days vacation per year at Snohomish County. In accordance with Edmonds City Code (ECC) 2.35.030.A.2, non -represented employees below the level of division manager (which this position is) accrue 11 days vacation per year for the first 5 years of employment with the City, 16 days for years 6 through 11, and 21 days for years 12 through 19. However, ECC 2.35.090.13 authorizes the Mayor, when he believes it is necessary to attract persons with experience at comparable public agencies, to extend offers to such individuals which provide for benefits, such as vacation accrual, greater than those to which an entry-level employee would be entitled. Such employment offers must be ratified by the City Council. Please see attached excerpts from ECC Chapter 2.35 I consider it reasonable to offer Mr. Chesterfield vacation accrual comparable to the vacation accrual he now receives as an employee of Snohomish County based upon his experience and years of government service. As noted above, Mr. Chesterfield has worked for Snohomish County for approximately 15 years. A non -represented City employee below the level of division manager who has worked for the City for more than 12 years accrues 21 days of vacation per year. I, therefore, request your approval to offer Mr. Chesterfield a starting vacation accrual of 21 days per year. If you approve, I will prepare a consent agenda item for City Council ratification. APPROVED: YES V NO /r_L4e_4_ Z. 7 �a"-F'y a enson, Mayor Date Packet Page 171 of 313 Title 2 CITY OFFICIALS AND PERSONNEL Page 17 of 30 Fourth Thursday of November (Thanksgiving Day); Day immediately following Thanksgiving Day; December 24th and 25th (Christmas Eve and Christmas Day); B. Each employee who, because of the nature of his/her service, serves on a holiday, shall be compensated in accordance with the following provisions: 1. Employees classified as nonexempt shall, at his/her option, be compensated for work on that holiday either by payment for such work at the overtime rate of pay or, may, at his/her election receive an equivalent amount of compensatory time off at a date convenient to the city. Such day away from service shall be set at a date mutually agreed upon, but shall be set within 12 months of the holiday served. Such rate of pay shall not be pyramided in the event that any hours worked are subject to the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 2. Exempt employees shall be permitted one full day away from service with full pay on a day which he/she would otherwise have served. Such day off shall be scheduled at a date mutually agreed upon within 12 months of the holiday served. C. No employee shall be called to work on any holiday for less than a full day of work. When any of the aforementioned holidays falls on a Sunday, the Monday following shall be considered the holiday. If the holiday occurs during an employee's vacation, he/she shall receive the holiday pay in addition to his/her vacation pay. D. Nothing in this section shall be construed to have the effect of adding or deleting the number of paid holidays provided for in any existing agreement between the city and any group or groups of employees of the city. If any of the legal holidays set forth in this section are also federal legal holidays but observed on different dates, only the holiday occurring on the date specified shall be recognized as a paid legal holiday. In no case shall both be recognized as paid legal holidays for employees. [Ord. 3404 § 1, 2002; Ord. 2821 § 1, 1991; Ord. 2571 § 1, 1986; Ord. 1862 § 1, 1976; Ord. 1422, 1969; Ord. 1168 § 2, 1966]. 2.35.030 Vacations. A. Regular employees shall accrue the following amount of vacation leave with pay based on the length of continuous service, as that term is defined in the personnel policies: 1. Nonexempt, represented employees shall receive vacation leave in accordance with the applicable collective bargaining agreement; 2. Nonexempt and exempt nonrepresented employees below the level of supervisor shall accrue annual vacation in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Employment Days of Vacation After the first 6 months of continuous employment 6 days of credit Second 6 months of continuous employment 5 days additional 2 years through 5 years 11 days per year 6 years through 11 years 16 days per year 12 years through 19 years 21 days per year 20 years and thereafter 22 days per year Fj Packet Page 172 of 313 htt-P:Hsrch.mrsc.or2:8080/code/DocView/edmondsmc/edmond02.html 2/7/2007 Title 2 CITY OFFICIALS AND PERSONNEL Page 18 of 30 3. Division managers, supervisors, and equivalent positions, consisting of those individuals designated as such in the annual salary ordinance, shall accrue annual vacation in accordance with the following schedule: Years of Employment Days of Vacation After the first 6 months of continuous employment 8 days of credit Second 6 months of continuous employment 8 days additional 2 years through 5 years 16 days per year 6 years through 11 years 21 days per year 12 years through 19 years 22 days per year 20 years through 24 years 25 days per year 25 years and thereafter 27 days per year 4. The police chief, fire chief and those individuals designated on the annual salary ordinance as directors shall initially accrue 22 days of vacation per year. Such accrual shall be credited on a semi-monthly basis with each employee's paycheck, except as provided above. The rate of accrual shall be reflected by a credit equal to the proportionate share of vacation earned for the period. B. Employees are encouraged to use their accumulated vacation time within the year in which it is accrued. Vacation accruals of up to one year's accumulation may be carried over from one year to the next. Employees who give notice of retirement within 24 months are authorized to accumulate two years' accrual at any time prior to retirement. C. Vacation schedules must be submitted by each department not later than March 1 st of each year. D. Any employee whose service is honorably terminated after the completion of six months of continuous service shall be paid for any vacation time accumulated prior to the effective date of termination. [Ord. 3583 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3545 § 2, 2005; Ord. 3505 § 1, 2004; Ord. 3279 § 2, 1999; Ord. 2970 § 1, 1994; Ord. 2716, 1989]. 2.35.040 Compensating time. When work beyond regular hours is required of an employee of the city (excluding those employees designated as exempt from this benefit on the annual salary schedule) compensating time off may be allowed as city requirements permit, subject to the following requirements: A. Nonexempt employees, on their request and at the city's option, may be permitted to take compensating time off at the overtime rate of one and one-half times the actual overtime worked in lieu of payment; provided, that such employees may not accumulate more than 40 hours of compensating time and any compensating time off must be used within the 12-month period following the date on which overtime is earned. B. All exempt employees other than those excluded by the annual salary ordinance (see subsection E of this section) shall receive compensatory time for night meetings, emergency call outs, and other similar periods for which they are required by their supervisor to work. Compensating time shall not be earned for short extensions of regular work hours less than one hour in length, such as staying late or coming in early. Compensatory time for such exempt employees shall be earned at the straight time rate, one hour of compensatory time earned for each hour worked. The measurement of such time shall be in accordance with the Packet Page 173 of 313 http://srch.mrsc.org: 8080/code/DocView/edmondsmc/edmond02.htm1 2/7/2007 Title 2 CITY OFFICIALS AND PERSONNEL Page 22 of 30 employees may earn additional leave hours on an inverse basis to the amount of sick leave used during the calendar year, in accordance with the following schedule: Hours of Sick Leave Used Annual Leave Hours Earned 0 24 8 16 16 8 24 0 Annual leave earned under this program shall be in the calendar year in which the leave was earned. Absences compensated through the state workers' compensation illness or injury program shall not be taken into consideration when applying the eligibility standards. The leave earned shall be pro -rated to the nearest full hour on the basis of sick leave used. F. Nonrepresented employees who have accrued in excess of 800 hours of sick leave may convert the excess hours to a cash payment at the rate of three hours of sick leave for one hour of compensation at the employee's current rate of pay, up to a maximum of $1,000 per year. The human resources department shall notify the employee of his or her accrued sick leave hours with the last paycheck in August of each year. The sick leave payout shall be paid with the first paycheck in January. Employees must request the optional sick leave payout within 10 working days from the date notice of accrued sick leave was provided. G. Newly hired employees who are entitled to transfer sick leave from their previous employer to the city of Edmonds pursuant to interlocal agreement, collective bargaining agreement and/or state law may transfer such sick leave banks subject to the rules set forth in this section. In addition, a transferred employee who would, under the provisions of the city's personnel policies, be required to pay back worker's compensation benefits advanced by the city and thereby restore his/her sick leave bank may exercise such rights with respect to funds received from Labor and Industries as worker's compensation within the first six months of their employment, thereby buying back sick leave which otherwise could have been transferred. [Ord. 3444 § 1, 2003; Ord. 3279 § 4, 1999; Ord. 2668 § 2, 1988; Ord. 2664 § 7, 1988; Ord. 1462, 1970; Ord. 1422, 1969; Ord. 1168 § 6, 1966]. 2.35.070 Transfer of position. In the event an employee is transferred from one position to another within the city, any accrued vacation time and/or accrued sick leave time and/or compensating time shall be available to the employee in his new position. [Ord. 1168 § 7, 1966]. 2.35.080 Extenuating circumstances. The foregoing provisions of this chapter shall be considered as minimum employee privileges, which may be extended for extenuating circumstances upon the approval of the mayor. [Ord. 1168 § 8, 1966]. 2.35.090 Conflict. A. In the event that any provision of this chapter or any provision of this title shall Packet Page 174 of 313 http://srch.mrsc.org: 8080/code/DocView/edmondsmc/edmond02.htmI 2/7/2007 Title 2 CITY OFFICIALS AND PERSONNEL Page 23 of 30 conflict with any provision of an employment contract or collective bargaining agreement approved by the city council, such contract or agreement shall prevail. In no event shall any employee be entitled to claim greater benefits under this chapter than those provided for by a collective bargaining agreement or employee contract covering said individual's employment. --B. It is understood that in order to attract experienced personnel, the city may be required to authorize deviations from the benefits established by this title or through the city's personnel manual. During the course of any budget year, the mayor or his designee is authorized to extend offer letters to individuals which provide for benefits greater than those to which an entry-level employee would be entitled. The purpose of this authorization is to permit the city to attract persons with experience at comparable public agencies. When the mayor, in his discretion, believes that it is necessary to attract such individuals to the city, benefits may be authorized which place an individual at a higher level of benefits, such as vacation accrual, than their hire date would otherwise indicate. Such employment offers shall be ratified by the city council. In the event such ratification is not granted, the individual shall retain those benefits only for the budget year in which they are offered. The mayor's offer shall not exceed the maximum imposed for employees of the classification or job status which has been established for such benefit without the prior written consent of the city council. All such offers shall be limited to and within the funds budgeted for the budget year in which the offer is made. [Ord. 3505 § 3, 2004; Ord. 2571 § 3, 1986]. Chapter 2.36 MILITARY LEAVE* Sections: 2.36.010 Annual leave for reservists. 2.36.020 Involuntary military service. 2.36.030 Other military leave and obligations. *Code reviser's note: Ord. 3373 added this chapter as Chapter 2.25. It has been editorially renumbered to prevent duplication of chapter numbers. 2.36.010 Annual leave for reservists. Every city employee who is a member of the Washington National Guard or of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Marine Corps Reserve of the United States, or of any organized reserve or armed forces of the United States, shall be entitled to annual leave as provided in RCW 38.40.060. [Ord. 3373 § 1, 2001]. 2.36.020 Involuntary military service. A. Subject to the provisions of subsections B through H of this section, every city employee who is involuntarily called to active duty in the Washington National Guard, or in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Marine Corps of the United States, shall be entitled to receive the following from the city, commencing on the first day the employee reports for active duty, the first day of duty after expiration of such leave and continuing for the period specified below or until the employee's discharge from active duty, whichever occurs first: 1. For 60 days: the difference, if any, between the employee's regular salary or wages, fixed as of the last day of service rendered to the city prior to reporting for active duty, and the monetary compensation paid to the employee Packet Page 175 of 313 http://srch.mrse.org:8080/code/DocView/edmondsmc/edmond02.html 2/7/2007 AM-839 92nd Ave W/234th St SW Intersection Safety Improvements Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For: Dave Gebert Time: Consent Department: Engineering Type: Action Review Committee: Action: 2.F. Agenda Memo Subiect Title Appropriation of $11,000 and authorization for Mayor to sign contract change order No. 2 for the 92nd Avenue West/234th Street SW Intersection Safety Improvements project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council appropriate $11,000 in additional funds from Street Construction/Improvement Capital Projects Fund 112 cash balance and authorize the Mayor to sign contract change order No. 2 to Dennis R. Craig, Inc. for the 92nd Avenue West/234th Street SW Intersection Safety Improvements project. Previous Council Action On August 22, 2006, Council awarded a construction contract to Dennis R. Craig, Inc. for the 92nd Avenue West/234th Street SW Intersection Safety Improvements project. Narrative During construction, Engineering staff determined the ditch along 234th Street SW should be tightlined instead of excavating into the toe of the slope, removal of two substantial trees and risking slope movement. Tightlining required the addition of four Type I catch basins, 250 lineal feet of 12-inch PVC storm pipe, additional striping and road improvements. The action requires additional funds be appropriated by City Council and execution of the attached change order. The approved construction budget for this project is $75,000. Construction is complete. Execution of this change order will require a total of approximately $86,000 for the completed project as follows: Contract Award $47,880 Contingency $0 Change Order 1 $3,760 Change Order 2 $30,003 Advertising $330 1% For Art N/A Testing (estimate) $4,000 Total $85,973 Staff recommends that Council appropriate an additional $11,000 from the Street Construction/Improvement Capital Projects Fund 112 cash balance. Sufficient cash balance is available in Fund 112. Link: Chance Order No. 2 Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 02/12/2007 11:02 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/12/2007 11:49 PM APRV 3 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 02/15/2007 01:26 PM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 01:49 PM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 02:02 PM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 02/12/2007 08:56 AM Packet Page 176 of 313 Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 177 of 313 CHANGE ORDER NO.2 February 8, 2007 PROJECT NAME: Contract No.: E5AC/c222 92" d Ave W/2341h St SW Intersection Safety Improvements Owner: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Contractor: Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 595 Redmond, WA 98073-0595 Under contract for the 92°d Ave W/234th St SW Intersection Safety Improvements = your contract is hereby revised as follows: Original Contract Amount: $ 47,880.25 Current Contract Amount (adjusted by previous change orders): $ 51,640.25 Net Change This Change Order: $ 30,003.15 Revised Contract Amount (including tax): $ 81,643.40 CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION: 1. Bid Item 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17 and 18. Actual quantities varied from contract bid quantities. During construction it was decided to tightline the ditch instead of excavating into the toe of the slope, removing two substantial trees and risking slope movement. Tightline required the addition of 4 Type I Catch Basins, 250 lineal feet of 12 inch PVC Storm Pipe, additional striping, road improvements and 137.75 tons of 1-1/4- CSBC resulting in an additional cost of $27,216.40. 2. Add Bid Item 19. Traffic Control. Additional flagging (Traffic Control) was utilized during the installation of the additional pipe and catch basins. 32 hours x $35.85 + 29% markup. $1,479.89 lump sum. 3. Add Bid Item 20. Standby. Contractor had to standby while extra work was being designed. No other work could be accomplished. $1,306.86 lump sum. Reconciliation/Actual Final Quantities on 1 Bid Items 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17 and $27,216.40 18 see attached pay request) 2 Traffic Control $ 1,479.89 3 Standby Time $ 1,306.86 SUBTOTAL $30,003.15 Sales Tax @ 8.9% N/A TOTAL $30,003.15 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: ❑ As a result of this change, the contract time is extended by a total of: 0 (® calendar days or ❑ working days). The revised required contract completion date is February 2, 2007. In accordance with WSDOT Standard Specifications 1-04.5, by his/her signature below, the contractor accepts all requirements of this change order and agrees that this change order constitutes full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract time and for all costs of any kind, including costs of delays, related to any work either covered or affected by the change. Packet Page 178 of 313 Accepted by Contractor: Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc. Date Approval Recommended David K. Gebert, PE Date City Engineer, City of Edmonds Printed Name, Title Approved Gary Haakenson, Mayor City of Edmonds Date Packet Page 179 of 313 N m c C N LL L6 IL 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00ii400i3f ajy 01" 41c) 0 B 0!6eM OO O o 0 o p 0 0 {hs 0 0 [v�i£$ t(1 '»;; 0 0 0 0 ai (D O O 0 0 O 0000 00S*INcfdNC (=i 6 6 6 0 OOLj 60 0 Opp ob, o�-rrtoa.Loo oo,voo 0 0 w O O O O LO Lo Lo o 0 o 0 0 0 O O O o p O 0 O O o Lo oD O w Lo OO O. (D MMLo OOO (DO D O Lo rm o d. r M I � o0 N vi oD O M m w Lo C Lo Lo cl� I, I: N r M (n V, r Ln o L,- o0 N N� (D Lo O V M JQ V V N L- r r 0 I N r N Lo r F- 0 F- (»(fl v)(» flJ Q3.6q 6q 61) yr v> v> EV Ev d3 v%» v% w w FQ 0 0 0 0 oo O n O oo p0 O O O O N O O O Z❑ O O O O O N r p �: O O O O o o O 0 r r m O r r o co r O m ~ N M co N C w U O O o r 0 N 00000000 O O O V O O o 0 p(o co co O (D (D Lo O O O (D O O O 66 d N m M O (A O Lo afl h r fM1 N r M Lo M r Lo p r cD r O cll J Q n r V N F O En(av3u>(nv)v}ua(nva(»»(»cRv>wwu3 ,v3e3 v% r F- f Z O O Lo N o to V' O try L- O O O M c N V' l l N r r t- O O r O Q O M co M N w O O O O O Lo O O O U O O O o O Ln N O O vh Ln op M CJ co O L L- LL f� M CO (D c ct (ND try J M N r O D r Q F 0 F (»dj Iq vj N v3 613 ER v)6%(R ER w v)N (» v9. v3'A fH � Lo N p r O Lo z Z r r r O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O O O Q O 04 N N M M � N cr w O O O O O O Lo o O O o O O O 0 o 0 o O (D O U O O O O N Lo . O O O o N O O O o O O co c0 'V Ln (7 cJ r M O O O(o lA N .L O O Ln O o o (D <L m r M M L` CO N V OJ Cp coM M V' O M Lo r co Lo O 1/ (D O N r n.N (D r Lo O L` W N (o r L,- r o 7 M N FN N N I- Lo Lo N N r M r r O H fR fA ffl EH (!) EA 49 fA v) v3 vT v3 fR 6% fH W d3 . vd v3 EA 0 0 0 o Lo to Lo O O O O o 0 o 0 0 O O w O O O O r Lo O Q] 0 0 0 o 0 0 O o co O O � U Lo W o o tT (D M M Lo 0 c0 O o O N n 0 (D p c) L` V' W V3 d3 EA��N ��w� w Ln n W EA M a ,d. v; V N 6% v} d3 N V N F fH d3 EA E9 V3 fA E9 N Z � V1 F (n(n(n wLL W wZLLZ W LLLLQQ(nQ } V) V) (n Z J J J J J J (n f J F- J J J W W J W U J J J >- h Z r M Lo N Ncc, Noo M co co N r r r Q M N M N O c E � N m O 6 Z O Uoo Qa F o c 0 c _d Lu o c N 4 0 (a O U LL (n0 - .7 N (n cU .- O O. 'O N l6 j U C O � W ❑ d ca O m E c E U v_ �: L O w c U7 C .N x CO W U U b cM- c N U o C L a)c O N ca o a 3 E c C E c o r w> N .o - > N« U r Q N O d '6 L> c c L" w 0 F- (n S p (Q U C N N > "6 E U c L U ._ F N L N o`O =0 O U i ,N c L U Z E- _ (gyp V C U V r C C C o 4 _ r N Xk N N xk # N O O OOOOvo a(r°�F w O r N co Low L-- m O O � r N Lt7 N r n M Q M M Z P7 W 1011 Packet Page 180 of 313 AM-840 2.G. Lake Ballinger Interlocal Agreement and RFQ Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For: Don Fiene Time: Consent Department: Engineering Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Authorization for Mayor to sign interlocal agreement for Lake Ballinger Lake Level Study and to advertise for statements of qualification from consultants for the study. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council authorize the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement for the Lake Ballinger Lake Level Study and also authorize staff to advertise for statements of qualification from consultants to perform the study. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Lake Ballinger has experienced high lake levels over the past few years, causing flooding of yards, docks, and houses surrounding the lake. To address these flooding problems, the Cities of Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace and Shoreline have decided to embark on a project to study the lake level. The purpose of this study is to recommend physical and policy solutions to manage the lake level. The solutions are to be based on hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the Lake Outlet and downstream system, with consideration of the impacts on the downstream drainage system. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis portions of the project will be performed by an engineering consultant to be selected by Staff from the aforementioned Cities. City of Edmonds Staff will act as the lead for the project. The study area will include all tributaries to Lake Ballinger plus the downstream tributary area of the creek that extends from the outlet at the Nile Country Club (McAleer Creek) to approximately 1,000 feet downstream of the culvert that carries the creek under Interstate 5. It is proposed that the cost of the study be shared by three of the cities that are part of the Lake Ballinger Watershed - Shoreline, Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds. The City of Lynnwood, which also contributes drainage to Lake Ballinger, has declined to participate. The City of Edmonds 2007 adopted capital budget includes $40,000 in Fund 412.200, Drainage System Projects, for Edmonds participation in this study. Attached as Exhibit 1 is the interlocal agreement for this study, which includes a breakdown on how the cost shares were derived. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this interlocal agreement. Also attached (Exhibit 2) is a Preliminary Scope of Work for the proposed study. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Interlocal Agreement Link: Preliminary Scope of Work Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 02/13/2007 10:19 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/13/2007 12:49 PM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 01:24 PM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/13/2007 01:27 PM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 01:32 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 02/13/2007 08:37 AM Final Approval Date: 02/13/2007 Packet Page 181 of 313 Packet Page 182 of 313 FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CITY OF SHORELINE FOR AN ENGINEERING STUDY TO DETERMINE THE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY OF MCALEER CREEK This agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day by and between the City of Mountlake Terrace ("Mountlake Terrace"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the City of Edmonds ("Edmonds"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington and the City of Shoreline ("Shoreline"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington. WHEREAS, Mountlake Terrace, Edmonds and Shoreline have in the past cooperatively shared responsibility for the effects of storm water runoff in the Lake Ballinger Basin; and WHEREAS, property owners on the shore of Lake Ballinger have experienced flooding of their docks and yards; and WHEREAS, the lowering of the stream bed of McAleer Creek between the lake outlet and an existing culvert under Interstate 5 along with reinstallation of the lake level weir at a lower elevation in the new stream bed may allow for additional water storage in Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek during storm events; and WHEREAS, a hydraulic study of the stream bed in this new configuration is necessary to determine if the stream bed can accommodate the proposed work; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions, Mountlake Terrace, Edmonds and Shoreline: 1. Purpose: It is the purpose of this agreement to fund a hydraulic study of McAleer Creek from the Lake Ballinger outlet to an existing culvert at Interstate 5. The hydraulic study will identify the feasibility of lowering the creek bed of McAleer Creek to provide additional water storage in Lake Ballinger during storm events. The study will quantify stream flow characteristics and provide information to evaluate how changes to the outlet system affect areas upstream (Lake Ballinger) and downstream (McAleer Creek). 2. Implementation: The Parties agree to reimburse Edmonds for a hydraulic study of Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek to quantify stream flow characteristics and provide information to evaluate how changes to the outlet system affect areas upstream (Lake Ballinger) and downstream (McAleer Creek). 2.1 Edmonds shall be responsible for: Packet Page 183 of 313 A. Drafting the scope of work for a qualified consultant to perform the hydraulic study. The scope of work shall be approved by all parties. The total amount for the hydraulic study shall not exceed $25,000. B. Developing and managing a professional services contract for a qualified consultant with hydraulic analysis experience. study. C. Acting as fiscal agent for the parties regarding all funds involved in the hydraulic D. Receipt and handling of funds. E. Awarding of contract. F. Public records retention and response. Edmonds will respond to public records requests made to it relating to the hydraulic study and will assist the other parties in response to records requests made to a specific party. G. Paying its prorated share as shown in Supplement 1 attached hereto. H. Providing a copy of the completed study to Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace. 2.2 Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace shall be responsible for: A. Paying the prorated share assigned to each city as shown in Supplement 1. Payment shall be made to Edmonds within 30 days of a request for reimbursement documented by a contract billing from the consultant performing the study. 3. Representatives. The Parties shall each designate project managers who have authority to administer all aspects of the Agreement. The Parties shall notify each other in writing within 14 days of the execution of this Agreement of these assignments, and shall promptly give notice of any change in the assigned project manager. 4. Indemnification. Each party shall defend and indemnify the others, their officers, agents, and employees from any and all judgment, claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, and damages of any nature, arising out of their negligent action in the performance of this agreement. 5. Termination. I Packet Page 184 of 313 5.1 Any party may terminate their involvement in this Agreement upon the provision of ten (10) days written notice to the other parties prior to the date on which a contract for the consulting services described herein had been awarded. 5.2 Following the award of a consulting contract, any party may terminate their involvement in the Agreement but shall remain obligated for the cost -sharing amount set forth on the attached Exhibit 1. 5.3 Unless terminated as provided above, this Agreement shall remain in effect until completion of the first hydraulic study contract with a qualified consultant, or December 31, 2007, whichever comes first. 5.4 If, on the agreement of a majority of the parties, this Agreement should be terminated and the contract for the hydraulic study terminated, the parties shall bear their respective portion of the costs incurred to the date of termination. In the event of such termination, any party or parties may continue to complete the report and shall have all rights to any partial product performed under this Interlocal Agreement to the date of termination. 6. Legal Relations. 6.1 It is understood that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the Parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture, agent -principal, partnership or separate legal or administrative authority is created by this Agreement. No employees or agents of one party or any of its contractors shall be deemed, or represent themselves to, employees of another party. 6.2 Edmonds shall require any contractor retained for the hydraulic study to maintain Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability and Professional and Professional Liability insuring that Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace, their officers, officials, agents and employees, as additional insureds. The contractor's insurance shall be the primary to and not contributing with any insurance or self insurance that may be carried by Shoreline or Mountlake Terrace. 6.3 The provisions of this section shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 6.4 This Agreement, inclusive of the Supplement hereto, contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to this undertaking, and supersedes all prior oral or written understandings, agreements, or promises. This agreement may not be modified or amended except by written instrument executed by the Parties' authorized representatives. 6.5 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each shall be deemed an original instrument, and all counterparts together will constitute one and the same Agreement. 3 Packet Page 185 of 313 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first herein above written. City of Mountlake Tece `1 a h City A4anager / Ls t Date Approved as to Form r ity Atto ey / &/r, • 1 Date 2' v / Date Approved s to Form City Attorney 11221107 Date City of Edmonds Mayor Date City Attorney Date 4 Packet Page 186 of 313 �a y N m o o Q Q U CO Q CO d-+ O o 0 U U r N M d Q C t c + o 0 L. N Cj o (nO a) Q- c 0 CD y 0 0 CA M 3LL U) O a> C o d LOan ti m a)L N N N O LO M vs O Qy LO t o i \ 0 LO N C R d o U � Q C O a1 y C d LO i Q CO O Q F ram CO U � Q 0 LO 11 r O N 0 O O T r p �r p LO r O O Q CD O LO � ao 0 0 M p ti O to r Cl) ti r h CG h r"r O y o m o a C = = a ~ F— p C 0 .—M � 0 C W O E J E O C W W CO p M N M kn Packet Page 187 of 313 LAKE BALLINGER LAKE LEVEL AND OUTLET STUDY PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK DRAFT INTRODUCTION Lake Ballinger has experienced high lake levels over the past few years, causing flooding of yards, docks, and houses surrounding the lake. To address these flooding problems, the Cities of Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace and Shoreline have decided to embark on a project to study the lake level. The purpose of this study is to recommend physical and policy solutions to manage the lake level. The solutions are to be based on hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the lake outlet and downstream system, with consideration of the impacts on the downstream drainage system. The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis portions of the project will be performed by an engineering consultant to be selected by Staff from the aforementioned three Cities. The study area will include all tributaries to Lake Ballinger plus the downstream tributary area of the creek that extends from the outlet at the Nile Country Club (McAleer Creek) to approximately 1,000 feet downstream of the culvert that carries the creek under Interstate 5. TASK 1 -GATHER AND REVIEW DATA A review will be made of available plans, maps, and data that may impact surface water in the study area. Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds shall collect and provide to the Consultant the items identified below: ■ Storm Drainage System Schematic Maps ■ Topographic maps ■ Existing and projected land use maps ■ Precipitation and lake level gage information. ■ Right of entry to private property for survey and hydraulic model data collection ■ Basin Study information ■ McAleer Creek Plan and Profile (1982 Lake Ballinger Restoration Project) 1 of 5 Packet Page 188 of 313 DRAFT LAKE BALLINGER ■ Other relevant studies TASK 2- PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND AGENCY COORDINATION The homeowners around the lake will have opportunity to provide input to the study. This will be accomplished through one public meeting (to be attended by Consultant) and communication with the association representatives. For the meeting, the consultant will be required to prepare work products and mapping produced as part of this scope of work. TASK 3-HYDROLOGY OF CONTRIBUTING BASIN Hydrologic analysis, using the HSPF model (or equivalent), will be performed to provide flow data for the hydraulic model described under Task 4. This task also includes using the hydrologic model to perform reservoir routing through the lake to simulate lake levels under existing and future conditions. TASK 3.1 DEVELOP HYDROLOGY FOR LAKE OUTLET AND MCALEER CREEK As part of the hydraulic analysis under Task 4, a backwater analysis of McAleer Creek will be performed from approximately 1,000 feet downstream of the I-5 culvert to the lake outlet structure (upstream). A new time series file using City of Everett precipitation data is now available. The HSPF model will be used with the most appropriate, available precipitation data to produce the hydrologic results for the Lake Ballinger Watershed. This flow data will be input into the backwater model under Task 4. TASK 3.2 PERFORM LAKE RESERVOIR ROUTING To predict lake levels under existing and future conditions, the HSPF hydrologic model will also be used to perform the lake reservoir routing simulations for different frequency flood events. To simulate the extent of existing lake flooding problems, the HSPF model will be used to calculate lake levels using the McAleer Creek stage discharge relationship determined by the backwater analysis in Task 4. The HSPF model results will be compared to known high water marks for recent flood events that occurred during the period of record. Efforts to perform a calibration of the HSPF model, or the backwater model described under Task 4, will be made in order to match the known high water marks. A frequency analysis of the continuous lake level simulations calculated with HSPF will be performed to determine the 2, 25, and 100-year frequency lake levels under existing conditions. We are assuming that the previous HSPF model did not use the new lake topographic survey data for determining the lake stage volume relationship. We have budgeted to input a new stage volume relationship into the HSPF model using the new lake mapping data. 2of5 Packet Page 189 of 313 DRAFT PRELIM I NARY SCOPE OF WORK HSPF will be used on a trial and error basis to develop a desired stage discharge relationship (outlet rating curve) for McAleer Creek that provides the desired lake level during the design frequency storm event. A maximum of 3 iterations will be made to produce the one outlet -rating curve for the design frequency storm. The proposed outlet -rating curve would serve as the goal to be achieved at the lake when performing the hydraulic analysis of McAleer Creek under future conditions as described in Task 5. TASK 4-HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION To properly evaluate the downstream system and provide an accurate stage discharge relationship for the lake, detailed hydraulic analysis of the downstream reach is necessary. To provide data necessary for hydraulic modeling, the Consultant shall conduct a field reconnaissance and prepare a photo log of the existing culverts, any visually apparent changes in channel section or slope, and channel roughness features. This task includes performing hydraulic modeling of McAleer Creek from the weir at the outlet of Lake Ballinger to the culvert at Interstate 5. The hydraulic modeling will be performed using the HEC-RAS backwater model. The model will be constructed to simulate existing and future land use water surface profiles for McAleer Creek for the 2, 25, and 100-year frequency flood events. This analysis will indicate where hydraulic capacity problems occur that result in flooding around the lake as well as flooding along McAleer Creek. From the HEC-RAS model, an existing conditions stage -discharge relationship for the lake outlet will be developed. This relationship will be input into the HSPF model for existing conditions as described under Task 3.2. Calibration of the HEC-RAS model will be based on trying to match simulations to observed flooding problems as gathered from residents and the cities of Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace. It is assumed that no calibration or changes to the runoff parameters for the HSPF model will be required for the HEC-RAS simulated water levels to match observed values. Using the calibrated HEC-RAS model, water surface profiles will be calculated for future land use. The product of this task will be stream water surface profiles under existing and future land use conditions presented in a tabular form for the various flood events. TASK 5-ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS ANALYSIS The purpose of this task is to identify and develop alternative solutions so that: 3of5 Packet Page 190 of 313 DRAFT LAKE BALLINGER • The lake level can be managed to specified elevations for a particular flood event, and • The downstream drainage system is protected from flooding under existing and future conditions. It is assumed that improvements will be developed for two criteria (e.g., 25 and 100-year level of protection). The HEC-RAS model will be used to define conveyance improvements necessary to solve both the flooding problems around the lake as well as existing or future flooding problems along McAleer Creek. To solve flooding problems around the lake, a proposed stage discharge curve for the lake will be calculated under Task 3.2. Improvements to the downstream hydraulics will need to be made in the HEC-RAS model on a trial and error basis until the proposed lake outlet stage discharge curve is matched. As discussed in Task 3.2, the hydraulic analysis may result in conveyance improvements that do not result in an outlet -rating curve at the lake that meets requirements for the design storm. Under this scenario one set of conveyance improvements, considered to result in the best achievable outlet conditions from the lake, will be input into the hydraulic model. This best achievable outlet -rating curve will then be input into HSPF to determine lake levels with these improvements in place. In general it will be assumed that the solution to lake level problems is to increase conveyance capacity by replacing culverts, altering the weir elevation and/or by enlarging the channel. But this must be balanced with the need to prevent or not aggravate downstream conveyance problems due to increased peak flows. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that: • One proposed stage discharge curve alternative (e.g., 25 or 100-year level of protection) from Task 3.2 for the lake outlet will be evaluated, and • Four iterations of the HEC-RAS model will be required to size new culverts and open channels that result in an outlet rating curve that matches the design frequency storm outlet rating curve described in Task 3.2. If these four iterations cannot describe a reasonable alternative that achieves the desired lake outlet -rating curve, then these same iterations will be used to describe the best achievable outlet -rating curve. Cost estimates for solutions will be developed. A recommended solution will be presented. TASK 6-REPORT PREPARATION A draft and final report detailing the work in prior tasks will be prepared and will include the following: ■ Summary of existing information and data acquisition 4 of 5 Packet Page 191 of 313 DRAFT PRELIM I NARY SCOPE OF WORK ■ Description of hydraulic and hydrologic modeling methodology ■ Description of hydraulic and hydrologic analysis for existing conditions ■ Description of alternative solutions, including assessment of downstream drainage system impacts ■ Identification of preferred solution(s) ■ The HSPF and HEC-RAS models, in digital format Four copies of the draft report will be submitted to the City of Edmonds. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that the Consultant will receive one set of review comments on the draft. Fifteen copies of the final report will be provided to the City of Edmonds. TASK 7-PROJECT MANAGEMENT The Consultant shall perform project management activities including: ■ Project scoping ■ Monthly invoicing and progress reporting ■ Maintaining project files ■ Miscellaneous client communication ■ Two meetings with Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds Staff ■ Work scheduling ■ Budget reviews ■ Quality control 5of5 Packet Page 192 of 313 AM-842 Low Fare Airport Taxi License Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Approval of 2007 Taxicab Operator's License for Low Fare Airport and Local For Hire Vehicle. 2.H. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council approve the 2007 Taxicab Operator's License for Low Fare Airport and Local For Hire Vehicle. Previous Council Action The City Council last approved the license for this taxi company on 10/3/06. Narrative Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.60 requires that the City Council approve Taxicab Operator's Licenses. A copy of the application submitted by this taxi company is attached. The Police Department has reviewed and approved the application. Link: Application Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 01:58 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/13/2007 02:12 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/13/2007 02:26 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 02/13/2007 01:47 PM Final Approval Date: 02/13/2007 Packet Page 193 of 313 CITY OF EDMONDS _ APPLICATION — TAXICAB OPERATOR'S LICENSE l890 _ 199" Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.60 Name of taxicab business: 4 6 L J rIJ P Name of Applicant: "16 Driver's License No.: First Name Afid(e Initia Last Address: 406)1, -L-- f 60 Stree Address T2 t <,✓A - y gate Zip - - Place of Birth: t ( $411 Date of Birth: _ 24 - S{/ Please list name and address changes that have occurred within the last two years preceding the current information: /JG hl Z-- . Previous Employment for Past Two Years: Employer: S A—q Telephone Number: Employer: Telephone Number: Attach additional sheet if necessary. Previous Record as a Taxicab Driver or Operator: Address: Dates of Employment: Address: Dates of Employment: Have you ever been licensed as a taxicab driver or operator? Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: Where: Sc-�l LL - When: 0a w` Has this license ever been suspended, revoked, or denied? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, for what cause: Record of Conviction: Have you ever been convicted of or forfeited bail for a crime, including all traffic offenses, for the preceding five years? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, give a detailed account of the charge, the approximate date, the name of the Court, and the final disposition of the charge or charges: Information on Vehicles to be Operated: Make: 6 3L Year: 2v v Model: �. C Vehicle Identification No:: _ — P ( 6 ( Vehicle License No.: ? G S 6 Z Make: Year: Model: Vehicle Identification No.: Vehicle License No.: 1Vlake:. Year: _. Model: Vehicle Identification No.: Vehicle License No.: Make: Year: Model: . Vehicle Identification No.: Vehicle License No.: Attach additional sheet if necessary. Packet Page 194 of 313 List of Proposed Drivers (MUST BE KEPT CURRENT): Name: S-TG:? Z6 J L ,I IJ � Driver's License Number: 0 /L-" �j150 Address: _2 1 l q 5 p l 0 / IL -f A - c7 ,L4 P -f' - Date of Birth: - 2- Name: Address: Date of Birth: Name: Address: Date of Birth: Driver's License Number: Driver's License Number: Attach additional sheet if necessary. Financial Status of Applicant: List any and all unpaid judgments and the nature of the transaction or acts giving rise to such judgment: Please attach Proof of Insurance as required by ECC Section 4.60.100. Signature of Applicant:L�� Subscribed and swop ;,befgne,e this % day of V 4; 4A y ft s qf. T FEES: Date: 1 — 31 - 0 No rJc- 7-iZA �_P A.1 ji e/Z d cc J (PrintName) NOTARY PUBLIC QMy appointment expires: v7' ISSUANCE OF LICENSE Initial Application Fee for Taxicab Operator's License (for investigation).............................................................. $100.00 Plus for each taxicab to be operated in the City of Edmonds.......................................................................... $30:00 Or after June 30 the fee for each taxicab shall be.................................................................................. $15.00 Plus for -each driver ($5 licensing fee plus $20 investigation fee)................................................................... $25.00 Renewal for Taxicab Operator's License (for each taxicab to be operated in the City of Edmonds) .......... ................ $30:00 Foreach previously licensed driver................................................................................................................... $5.00 New drivers pay the $5 licensing fee and the $20 investigation fee............................................................... $25.00 TOTAL FEES PAID: I TREASURER'S RECEIPT NUMBER: CONDITIONS: ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe: City Clerk: Date: Packet Page 195 of 313 Jan 31 2007 12:12PM Marquette Cook & Rssociat 2067721275 P.1 ACORA. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE oir�ia a�' PRODLN:ER THIS CERTIFICATE IS i3SUFD AS A MATTER OF INFORMATiO? ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATI Marquette Cook &Associates 206.371.9669 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND 01 903 Union St. Suite 801 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES SELOW Seattle, WA 98101 I INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE � ! NAIL* _ weuaEo I INsu` RERa�`anall insuranCe� _� 10464. -- Hiskes - Lee inc DBA: Law Fare Airport and Local for Hire ___.—� -- Vehicle#2 j u�sR �.. __._ -- 3417 S. 150ti� St I ,NslR7C-R D: — Tukwila, WA. 98188 INSUAERE: CQVF-KAvl5 - HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDMON BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECTTO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED POLICIES. AGGREGATE OMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED SY PAID CLAIMS. IN R D'L ` - fT--POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE mmmmopnffy�I POLICY EIIPR4TIQh�-- iJt IT3 I i 'EACH OOCURRENCE ' S LGENERALiJA50LITY � ---!�—. 11 ! COMAMCIALGEdvEFAI_4hB1O7Y I i i PIZP1d1SE8{Eaoeeuren S one pes.;o) —--r---'-'._-'- L ' CLAIM VAO_ �CCCUR I !• LEDEXP:Any PERSONAL&ADVINJURY I S — — -- i GENERALAGGREGATE S i PRODUC-S-OOMPIOPKaG ( .$ 1. GEIfiL AGGREGATEWMT Ar FuES PER::. I POLICY f i AUTYNAOBILE LUIBILRY DonnelNraslNclEueaT I' 325,000 iEa cciaeEN) --- - A ! I ANYAUTD 4 _ ' ALLOWNEDAUfCS ( ' I I BCDILYRiJURY tPcrpuecn) S SCHEOULEDAUPDS 487906 ' 0812812008 � 08128I2ti07 r----..-- H'REOAUTCS IXXILY�INJr�,RY 1 NON-OV446D AUTOS i I-- PROPEM Y DAMAGE - ?PeraaaWnl) —T I LLRBILITY I ! LAUTO ONLY EAACCIDENT ' S ---_____-- S �3ARABa ANYAUTO OT THAN CAM ER n AGG $ EWEL,AILAM:m, j 'EACHOCCURRENCE S , — -- 5EW OCCUR CIJUNish?ADE OREGATE S CEDUCT8LE RETENTION 5 T1V6 A WORKERBCOMPOWATION AND I i j 6.L. EACH ACODDENT EMPLOYERS' UABIUTY. ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNEMEXECU PVE OFFICF'JiIMEMBERF7cCL44ED? i ! 8 — E.L. DISEASE -EA E)iPL7YPE EL UMFASE-POLICYUMIT S I` d..M. new AL PROVlslousbd: w I OTHM i i DEECIUPTWMOFOPERATSMS/LOCATNNIB/VEKICLESIEXC %MOMBAWXDBYENDMOMEWriWe ULPROVOIWO Certificate as proof Of Insurance for 2001 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan VlN.2FAFP71W0jX147459. i i CERTIFICATE HOLDER �.iawa.ea uae w�v r) 771.0266 FAX Attn: Huda SHOULD ANY OFTHHABOIREDE&CRIEEOFOLICESBECANCELLEDSWORETHE EXPIRATWN DATE THEREOF. IWE IntMa INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MALL _19.- DAYS WRrMN City Of Edmonds NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER aANI0P TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL 121 5TH Ave N IMPOSE NO OSUDATM OR U"ILRY OF ANY HARD UPON THE WOURER, ; M AGENTS OR Edmonds, Washington 98020 REP:ESENTATIVES. 1938 Packet Page 196 of 313 AM-845 Hearing Examiner Services Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Debi Humann, Human Resources Time: Consent Department: Human Resources Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subiect Title Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services. 2.I. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The attached Professional Services Agreement has been reviewed by legal counsel, staff, as well as Towell Rice Taylor and has been mutually agreed to by all parties. The agreement is before Council to be approved as a consent item. Previous Council Action None. Narrative The Professional Services Agreement with Ron McConnell, FAICP, our previous Hearing Examiner, expired on December 31, 2006. Since Mr. McConnell elected not to renew his contract with the City, the City sought his replacement through a RFQ/RFP process. Per City Code, the three top candidates were interviewed and the firm Toweill Rice Taylor was selected to become the new Hearing Examiners through December 31, 2010 under the conditions contained in the attached agreement. Link: Professional Services Agreement Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/14/2007 03:42 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/14/2007 05:07 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/14/2007 05:18 PM APRV Form Started By: Debi Humann Started On: 02/14/2007 03:35 PM Final Approval Date: 02/14/2007 Packet Page 197 of 313 Professional Services Agreement For Land Use Hearing Examiner Services IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual covenants herein and the mutual benefits to be derived, the City of Edmonds (the City) and Toweill Rice Taylor LLC (TRT or the Hearing Examiner) agree as follows: 1. Duties of the Hearing Examiner. TRT shall provide those services and fulfill those duties identified in the City of Edmonds ordinances relating to the Office of the Hearing Examiner and carry out such other responsibilities as agreed to herein between the City and TRT. Those services, duties, and responsibilities include reviewing information provided by City staff and applicable laws in preparation for the hearing; holding pre - hearing conferences and issuing pre -hearing orders on individual cases as necessary for the clarification of issues to be addressed at the hearing; conducting hearings on all matters to which the City's ordinances grant Hearing Examiner jurisdiction; receiving testimony and documentary evidence; preparing final written decisions including findings of fact and conclusions of law for each case heard; and issuing decisions on post -hearing motions. TRT shall be responsible for providing a final written decision in each matter to the City and to parties of record via notice from the City of Edmonds Office of Hearing Examiner. The date by which the final decision shall be issued will be the date set forth in the City's code. 2. Duties of the City. The City shall be responsible for providing the support necessary to execute the duties established in this Agreement, including but not limited to: a complete copy of all appropriate current city codes and resolutions; a public hearing room sufficient to accommodate TRT, City Staff, applicants/respondents, attorneys, and members of the public wishing to attend; recording equipment adequate to establish a verbatim recording of each public hearing; a staff person to accept exhibits, operate recording equipment during hearings, and maintain custody of the official record in each matter; and telephone conferencing for pre -hearing conferences as needed. The City shall be responsible for publishing legal notice of hearings pursuant to the provisions set forth in the City's code; for recording hearings; preserving the audio and documentary record on each matter; and providing TRT with a complete mailing list for all parties of record known in advance of the public hearing. The City shall be the keeper of the official record in each matter and shall provide the Hearing Examiner with a working copy of said record. The City shall provide to TRT copies of recordings of the public hearing. The City shall provide TRT with Office of Hearing Examiner stationery and shall reimburse TRT for the cost of copies and postage incurred in mailing final decisions to parties of record. 3. Term of Agreement. The services of TRT pursuant to this Agreement are to commence on , 2007 and will expire on December 31, 2010. The first partial calendar year of the term (2007) shall be probationary (probationary year) during which TRT will serve subject to the approval of the Mayor. During the probationary year, the Mayor at his sole discretion may terminate this contract or in his sole discretion, { WSS651385.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services City of Edmonds and Toweill Rice Taylor LLC page 1 of 5 Packet Page 198 of 313 terminate the provision of services by TRT or any individual approved service -providing member of TRT. During the balance of the term, TRT shall be removed from the Hearing Examiner Office only for good cause, provided, however, that good cause termination may be applied to either TRT or any individual approved service -providing member at the sole discretion of the City. In the event of termination, TRT will complete any matter then pending at the rates set forth in this Agreement, invoice the City accordingly, and the City shall compensate TRT within thirty (30) days of invoicing. 4. Nonassignment; Approval of Service Providers. The City has interviewed LeAnna C. Toweill, Sharon A. Rice and Julie K. Ainsworth -Taylor and approves the provision of services under this Agreement by these individuals (service -providing members) through TRT. The City reserves the right to approve the provision of service as Hearing Examiner by any person other than the approved service -providing members of TRT. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit TRT from utilizing clerical assistance through its employees in the provision of services under this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement may not be assigned, whether to another entity or to another or future member of TRT. 5. Hearing dates. Hearing dates shall be assigned to individual members of TRT on a rotating, as -available basis, unless otherwise agreed between the parties. The City's land use hearings shall be conducted, if any, on the first Thursday of each month. If additional hearing time is required, a second docket shall be scheduled on the third Thursday of each month. In the event of specially set hearings required to be held on other dates, the City shall provide TRT with notice of the special hearing date no less than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduled hearing. The City shall provide TRT with the working copies of the record in each matter, including the staff report and all available exhibits, no less than seven (7) days prior to the scheduled hearing date. 6. Compensation. TRT shall be paid by the City at the rate of $3500 per month for years 2007 and 2008 for services rendered under this Agreement. TRT shall be paid by the City at the rate of $3600 per month for years 2009 and 2010 for services rendered under this Agreement. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered to complete the work. 7. Payment. TRT shall maintain time and expense (if any) records and provide them to the City monthly, along with monthly invoices in a format acceptable to the City for work performed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be paid by the City within thirty (30) days of receipt of a proper invoice. 8. Discrimination and Compliance with Laws. TRT agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment or any other person in the performance of this Agreement because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age, disability, or other circumstance prohibited by federal, state, or local law or ordinance, except for a bona fide occupational qualification. TRT shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this { WSS651385.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services City of Edmonds and Toweill Rice Taylor LLC page 2 of 5 Packet Page 199 of 313 Agreement. TRT shall also comply with the Washington State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys. 9. Standard of Care. TRT represents and warrants that it has the requisite training, skill and experience necessary to provide the services under this agreement and is appropriately accredited and licensed by all applicable agencies and governmental entities. Services provided by TRT under this agreement will be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing in similar circumstances. 10. Ownership of Work Product. All final decisions, orders, and other documents issued by TRT pursuant to this Agreement, all exhibits submitted into the record, and all official recordings shall be the property of the City. All such documents, exhibits, and recordings shall be forwarded to the City upon request and may be used by the City as it sees fit. The City agrees that if the documents, exhibits, and recordings are used for purposes other than those intended in this Agreement, the City does so at its sole risk and agrees to hold TRT harmless for such use. All services performed under this Agreement shall be conducted solely for the benefit of the City and shall not be used for any other purpose without express written consent of the City. 11. Correspondence and Notices. (a) Correspondence and Notices to the City shall be sent to the following address: Sandy Chase, City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (b) Correspondence and Notices to TRT shall be sent to the following address: Toweill Rice Taylor LLC Attn: Sharon Rice 11410 NE 124th Street, No. 189 Kirkland, WA 98034-4399 12. Independent Contractor Relationship. Both parties recognize the quasi-judicial nature of the Office of Hearing Examiner. It is agreed by and between the parties that this Agreement shall not constitute nor create an employer -employee relationship. TRT is an independent contractor and shall be responsible for all obligations relating to federal income tax, self-employment, and other typically employer -paid taxes and contributions. Any employee of TRT, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by TRT under this Agreement, shall be considered an employee of TRT only and not of the City. { WSS651385.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services City of Edmonds and Toweill Rice Taylor LLC page 3 of 5 Packet Page 200 of 313 13. Freedom from Influence. TRT shall be free of any supervision or other influence from City officials and employees with respect to any decision or recommendation made by TRT on a specific case, issue, or permit. 14. Dispute Resolution. This section applies only to billing and for disputes under Sections 6 and 7, and not to any other provision of this Contract. (a) Mediation. Any dispute arising out of this Agreement will be submitted to mediation before a neutral third party. If the parties cannot mutually agree upon a mediator, they will ask the presiding judge of Snohomish County Superior Court to appoint one. The parties will attempt in good faith to resolve their dispute through mediation. The parties will participate in mediation no more than 15 days later than one party provides written notice to the other of the nature of the dispute and the desire for mediation. All costs of mediation, if any, will be split equally between the parties and each party will bear its own attorney fees. (b) Arbitration. If mediation is not successful, the parties will submit the dispute to binding arbitration under rules and procedures set forth by the American Arbitration Association. If the parties cannot mutually agree upon an arbitrator, they will ask the presiding judge of Snohomish County Superior Court to appoint one. The substantially prevailing party at arbitration will be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and attorney's fees from the other party. (c) Injunctive and Equitable Relief Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, in the event a good faith attempt at mediation is not successful and in lieu of arbitration, any party may apply to Snohomish County Superior Court for equitable or injunctive relief. The parties agree that in any such action neither party will submit nor will the Court have authority to consider any claims for money damages, it being the intent of the parties that all such claims be resolved through mediation or arbitration. The substantially prevailing party in any Court action for equitable or injunctive relief will be entitled to recover its reasonable costs and attorney's fees from the other party. 15. Indemnification. TRT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its agents, and employees from and against any and all liability arising from claims resulting in whole or in part from negligent acts or omissions of TRT, its agents, servants, officers, or employees, irrespective of whether it is alleged or claimed that an act of the City, its agents, or employees caused or contributed thereto. 16. Insurance. TRT shall obtain insurance of the types described below: Automobile Liability. TRT shall maintain auto insurance covering all owned, non -owned, hired and leased vehicles with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 17. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the complete and integrated understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes any understanding and/or agreement { WSS651385.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services City of Edmonds and Toweill Rice Taylor LLC page 4 of 5 Packet Page 201 of 313 of negotiation, whether oral or written, not set forth herein. Any waiver of breach, by TRT or the City, of any provision of this Agreement by the other party will not operate, or be construed, as a waiver of any subsequent breach by either party or prevent either party from thereafter enforcing any such provisions. If any part of this Agreement is found to be in conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null, and void insofar as it is in conflict with said laws, and the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. AGREED TO this day of Mayor Gary Haakenson, City of Edmonds (i) (ii) (ill) TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC LeAnna C. Toweill, Member Sharon A. Rice, Member Julie K. Ainsworth -Taylor, Member { WSS651385.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Professional Services Agreement for Land Use Hearing Examiner Services City of Edmonds and Toweill Rice Taylor LLC 2007. page 5 of 5 Packet Page 202 of 313 AM-847 Agreement for Legal Services Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Debi Humann, Human Resources Time: Consent Department: Human Resources Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subiect Title Agreement for Legal Services between City of Edmonds and Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.L.L.C. 2.1. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The attached Agreement has been reviewed by staff, Attorney Scott Snyder, and an independent attorney (Grant Weed of Weed, Graafstra and Benson, Inc., P.S.) and has been deemed satisfactory as to form and content. It is coming forward for approval by City Council in compliance with Edmonds City Code. Previous Council Action None Narrative The attached Agreement for Legal Services allows for services to continue between the City of Edmonds and Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.LLC., for the term January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2010 under the provisions and considerations as set forth in the agreement. The rates for services for budget year 2007 are the same as budget year 2006. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Agreement for Leaal Services - City Attorney Link: Exhibit A Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 11:39 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 01:21 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 01:37 PM APRV Form Started By: Debi Humann Started On: 02/15/2007 11:26 AM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 203 of 313 Page 1 AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on the date last below written between the City of Edmonds (the "City") and the law firm of Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.L.L.C. (the "Attorneys"). FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the terms and conditions set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1. Services to be Provided. Attorneys will serve as attorneys for the City on all civil legal matters assigned or referred to Attorneys by the City during the term of this Agreement, and will specifically perform the following legal services for the City: A. Routine Services. Attorneys will perform all routine city attorney services for the City to the extent requested by the City. Examples of such routine services include, but are not limited to: 1) Preparing for and attending City Council meetings; 2) Drafting and reviewing contracts and agreements; 3) Drafting ordinances and resolutions; 4) Answering telephone calls from City elected officials and staff and providing general consultation; 5) Attending meetings with City Mayor and staff (including regular office hours if requested) or Council members; 6) Attending meetings of other City boards and commissions, such as the Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment, when requested to do so; 7) Negotiating with third parties other than in a litigation context, i.e., negotiating contracts, development conditions, or other non -litigation matters. B. Litigation and other Non -Routine Services. Attorneys will also represent and provide legal services to the City in litigation and other non -routine legal matters. Examples of such matters include, but are not limited to: 1) Representing the City and its officials in litigation matters provided, that in cases where the City and its officials have insurance coverage, Attorneys will represent the City and its officials only until WCIA retained attorneys are actively handling the case or to the extent necessary to deal with non -covered claims or to provide consultation and coordination between the City and the WCIA retained attorneys. 2) Representation of City employees in accordance with Edmonds City Code Chapter 2.06; Packet Page 204 of 313 Page 2 3) Labor negotiation or arbitration; 4) Services related to local improvement districts; 5) Services requiring a tax specialist; 6) Administrative proceedings before another governmental unit (such as Boundary Review Board hearings, proceedings before the State Shoreline Hearings Board, or proceedings before the State Growth Management Hearings Board). 2. Payment for Services. Legal services performed under this Agreement shall be compensated at the rates set forth in the attached Exhibit A during budget year 2007 (see paragraph 3.1). The City will not be charged separately for normal secretarial or clerical work, the expense for which has been calculated into the Attorney's hourly rate. Reimbursement will be made by the City for expenditures for court costs and fees, copying, postage, and computer aided legal research, when made on behalf of the City, and for travel or long distance telephone calls outside of the metropolitan Seattle area when required on City business. Direct costs for experts, printing and other litigation support services provided by third parties in the course of litigation may be forwarded to the City for direct payment. 3. Term/Fees/Termination. 3.1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for four (4) years commencing January 1, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2010. The Agreement may be renewed for additional terms with the express written consent of the parties. It is the anticipation of the City Council at the date of execution of this Agreement that the services of the City Attorney shall be reviewed on a four (4) year basis in concert with the contracts and appointment of its municipal judge, hearing examiner, prosecutor and public defender. 3.2. Fees. The schedule of fees provided for by Section 2 and shown on Exhibit A shall be reviewed annually by the City Council. Changes in fees shall first be proposed by the Attorneys to the Mayor for consideration in the preparation of the mayoral budget. Increases in such fee and cost structure, if any, shall be considered by the City Council as a part of its budget process. Such changes, if any, to the fee structure and the budget process approved by the City Council shall, upon acceptance by the Attorneys be made a part of this Agreement and as replacement to Exhibit A. 3.3. Termination of Agreement. The attorney/client relationship is a personal one involving the ability of the parties to communicate and maintain credibility. Therefore, the City Council reserves in its sole legislative discretion the right to terminate this Agreement upon reasonable notice during its term. The Attorneys agree that they will not terminate the Agreement without providing for a reasonable period of transition mutually agreed upon by the parties. 4. Designation and Approval of Principal Service Providers. At the date of execution of this Agreement, it has been the representation of the Attorneys that legal services to the City will be provided principally by or under the supervision of W. Scott Snyder, WSBA #12835. The parties recognize that services may be provided by others in the firm based upon their expertise and the need to provide services at appropriate Packet Page 205 of 313 Page 3 billing rates by junior and senior attorneys, paralegals and legal assistants within the firm in order to achieve the most cost effective provision of legal services. The City Council upon the advice and recommendation of the Mayor reserves the right to review and approve each attorney providing service to the City. By execution of this Agreement, the City specifically approves a provision of services through or under the direction of W. Scott Snyder by the attorneys shown in the Attorney's proposal of November 1994, incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth herein in full. 5. Ownership of Work Product. All data, materials, reports, memoranda, and any other documents developed under this Agreement whether finished or not shall become the property of the City, shall be forwarded to the City at its request and may be used by the City as the City sees fit. City agrees that if products prepared by the Attorneys are used for purposes other than those intended in this Agreement, City does so at City's sole risk and agrees to hold the Attorneys harmless for such use. 6. Insurance. The Attorneys shall maintain proof of professional liability insurance in the minimum amount of $10,000,000. 7. Discrimination. Attorneys agree not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment or any other person in the performance of this Agreement because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age, sexual identity, or physical, mental or sensory handicap, except where a bona fide occupational qualification exists. 8. Hold Harmless. Attorneys agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, judgments or awards of damages, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of Attorneys. The City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Attorneys from and against any and all claims, judgments or awards of damages, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors, or omissions of the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents. 9. Independent Contractor. The Attorneys are and shall be at all times during the term of this Agreement independent contractors and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from all costs associated with the wages and benefits of the Attorney's employees. 10. Rules of Professional Conduct. All services provided by Attorneys under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys established by the Washington Supreme Court. 11. Work for Other Clients. Attorneys may provide services for clients other than the City during the term of this Agreement, but will not do so where the same may constitute a conflict of interest unless the City, after full disclosure of the potential or actual conflict, consents in writing to the representation. Any potential conflicts shall be handled in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct referred to above. 12. Subcontracting or Assignment. Attorneys may not assign or subcontract any portion of the services to be provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Packet Page 206 of 313 Page 4 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreement between the City and the Attorneys, superseding all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, written or oral. This Agreement may be modified, amended, or added to, only by written instrument properly signed by both parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day of 12007. CITY OF EDMONDS: OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, P.L.L.C.: Gary Haakenson, Mayor Don Black, Managing Member ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk Packet Page 207 of 313 EXHIBIT A Proposed Fee Structure The budget year 2007 fee schedule shall be as follows: Hourly Rate: • Senior Member (20+ years as Lead Municipal Attorney): $200/hour • Member $175/hour • Associate: $150/hour • Paralegal $ 70/hour **Special Rates: • Two staff meetings per month: $650 per meeting • Two council meetings per month: $650 per meeting "These are "do not exceed" amounts. The actual time, portal to portal, will be billed to the maximum indicated. Special Services: Special services not referenced in Section 1 of the Agreement may be provided by approved members or associates when requested and approved by the city at a 15% discount from the fees normally charged by Ogden Murphy Wallace of its corporate clients. Term: These rates are effective for 2007 only. dlh2/16/2007 Packet Page 208 of 313 AM-850 Prisoner Detention Agreement Addendum Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Al Compaan, Police Department Department: Police Department Review Public Safety Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Time: Consent Type: Action Agenda Memo Subiect Title Approval of 2007 Addendum to Prisoner Detention Agreement with City of Lynnwood Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve and authorize Mayor to sign contract addendum. Previous Council Action Reviewed by Public Safety Committee on February 13, 2007. Approved for consent agenda with a "do pass" recommendation. 2. K. Narrative The City of Lynnwood and the City of Edmonds originally signed a Prisoner Detention Agreement on May 2, 1994. The agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of our utilization of Lynnwood Jail services. Since that time, there have been several addenda to the agreement regarding remuneration issues. Lynnwood has presented us with an addendum, effective January 1, 2007, covering our portion of the Whatcom County cooperative prisoner transport service. Our share of the fee for 2007 is $13,067.67. Our fee for 2006 was $10,845.00. Whatcom County provides daily prisoner transportation service along the I-5 corridor from Bellingham to Seattle. The total costs of Whatcom County's NW Minichain are divided proportionately among participating agencies based on the number of prisoners transported. This is a "pass through" amount charged to Lynnwood and then billed to us by Lynnwood. Funds are already allocated in the approved 2007-2008 budget in Police (general Fund) Prisoner Care. All other terms and conditions of the Prisoner Detection Agreement with the City of Lynnwood remain unchanged. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2007 Revenue: Expenditure: Fiscal Impact: Funds already allocated in approved 2007-2008 Police (General Fund) budget Attachments Link: Prisoner Detention Addendum Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 01:47 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 02:03 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Al Compaan Started On: 02/15/2007 12:55 PM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 209 of 313 CITY OF LYNNWOOD Contract Title: Contract Number: 533 Addendum The following amends the original Interlocal Contract between the City of Lynnwood and the City of Edmonds, originally dated, January 1998. This Addendum extends the Contract duration and becomes a part of the Contract documents. The items below clarify or modify the original Contract as follows: 1. TERM OF CONTRACT: This modifies section 3, Term of Contract, in the originating Contract. This extends the duration of the Contract until December 31, 2007, unless otherwise terminated in writing by either party. 2. COMPENSATION: Annual compensation increases from $32,535.00 to $39,203.00. The Edmonds portion of this divided interlocal agreement with Whatcom County will be $13,067.67 3. All remaining Contract terms and conditions remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contractor have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written CITY OF LYNNWOOD W B) ,a - L-O'j Date ATTEST: C.1 Vicki Heilman, AssistAnt Finance Director hate: / "fC' -d r APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mike Ruark, City Attorney Date: CONTRACTOR: Please fill in the spaces and sign in the box appropriate for your business entity. Other Agency [City of Edmonds] By --- - TypedlPrnted Name: Its Date: Packet Page 210 of 313 AM-830 Agreement with City of Bothell & N.C. Machinery Edmonds City Council Meeting 2.L. Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Kim Karas, Public Works Submitted For: Dave Sittauer, Manager, Fleet Maintenance Time: Consent Department: Public Works Type: Action Review Finance Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subiect Title Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Bothell and the City of Edmonds, in conjunction with N.C. Machinery for the purchase of one (1) new Backhoe in the amount of $98,272.63, including tax. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Authorize the Public Works Department to enter into an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Bothell and the City of Edmonds; in conjunction with N.C. Machinery for the purchase of one (1) new Backhoe in the amount of $98,272.63, including tax. Previous Council Action Narrative The Street Divison of the Public Works Department is scheduled to replace their 1993 Caterpillar Backhoe in the 2007 fiscal year, utilizing the 511 Replacement Fund. In August 2006, the City of Bothell solicited sealed bids for 1 (one) new Backhoe with provisions for other cities to enter into an Interlocal Agreement utilizing their specifications and contract price, including pricing for various options. N.C. Machinary agrees to make available, the same bid terms and prices to other governmental agencies within the state of Washington. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 207 Revenue: $107,030.00 Expenditure: 98,272.63 Fiscal Impact: There will be no fiscal impact. Our resources are: Link: Interlocal Agreement Link: NC Machinery Ouote $85,719.00 Unit #63 B-Fund $11,311.00 Unit #53 B-Fund $10,000.00 Sale Value Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 04:32 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 09:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/16/2007 08:22 AM APRV Form Started By: Kim Karas Started On: 02/07/2007 10:42 AM Final Approval Date: 02/16/2007 Packet Page 211 of 313 INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of February, 2007, by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, and the CITY OF BOTHELL, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington. WHEREAS, on or about August 1, 2006, the City of Bothell put out an Invitation to Bid for a Rubber Tire Backhoe and Front End Loader under No. Fleet #2; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2006, the City of Bothell awarded the purchase contract to N.C. Machinery (the "Contractor") subject to specified terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, one such term and condition is that the Contractor agrees to make the same bid terms and price, exclusive of freight, available to other Washington governmental agencies; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds and the City of Bothell are authorized under chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into this agreement to provide for the cooperative purchase of materials, supplies and equipment; Now, Therefore, IT IS AGREED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this agreement shall commence on the date of execution of the agreement by the City of Edmonds and the City of Bothell and shall remain in effect for the duration of this purchase. 2. Material(s)jquipment. The equipment subject to this agreement is that set forth in the City of Bothell's technical specifications in the above referenced bid and N.C. Machinery's bid response, along with any options offered by N.C. Machinery in its bid response. 3. Cooperative Purchase. Additional quantities of these materials/equipment may be purchased by other public agencies pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW and other public agencies may utilize the City of Bothell's contract for this equipment and purchase directly from Contractor without additional competitive bidding. This is only allowable when the original contract was competitively bid and allows other public agencies to use the contract, as the parties acknowledge is the case here. 4. Separate Contract, Financial Responsibility. The City of Edmonds will execute its own contract with the Contractor for its requirements and shall be financially responsible for the payment of the purchase price of all materials, deviations as agreed by both parties from the original bid specifications, change orders, supplies and equipment purchased and received by the City of Edmonds under the terms of such agreement. 5. Ownership. Title to all items purchased by the City of Edmonds shall be vested in the City of Edmonds. { AS B 6 51129. DOC;1 /00006.900000/ } Packet Page 212 of 313 6. Limitations: This agreement is limited to the purchase of the equipment as outlined in the original proposal specifications, deviations as agreed by both parties and any change order deemed to be in the best interest of the City of Edmonds. 7. Records. A copy of this agreement shall be filed with and maintained by each parry to this agreement. CITY OF EDMONDS CITY OF BOTBELL By: Its: Date: Mayor, City of Edmonds By: Its: Date: Page 2 of 2 Packet Page 213 of 313 NC MACHINERY January 25, 2007 Mr. Dave Sithauer City Of Edmonds Public Works Dept Edmonds, WA 98026-7219 Dear Dave: We are pleased to quote the following for your consideration: (1) Caterpillar 420E 4ECAB , 2006 model w/4 hours, Unit# 26W57052, S/N OHLS01314. Price: $90,909.08 The following factory and dealer options are included: * Hydraulics, Bh, 6 Function, 2692148 * Hydraulics,Loader,Multi Purp., 2692145 * Cab, Deluxe W/Ac, 2692127 * Powertrain,89 Hp,4Wd,Std Shift, 2163315 * Cooler, High Ambient, 2144749 * Stabilizer Pads,Flip W/Guard, 1333362 * Manuals, English, OP0572 * Tires 4Wd Bias Goodyear, 2011918 * Lines, Combined Aux, E-Stick, 2624202 * Bucket 24", 8.5 Cft He Soil, 2548941 * Counterweight, 1075 Lbs, 2529984 * Quick Coupler,Pin Grabber,Man., 1788850 * Pins, Spare, 1783593 * Beacon, Magnetic Mount, 2114292 * Heater, Engine Coolant, 120V, 2482214 * Plate Group - Boom Wear, 2703204 * Lock, Vandalism, 2160909 * Cutting Edge, Two Piece,Wide, 9R5320 * Battery, Heavy Duty, 2114286 * Breather, Open Circuit, 2507963 * Parts Book, Paper, OP0423 * Fenders, Front, 2013954 * Fenders, Rear Extensions, 2499328 * Ride Control, 2099937 * Coupling, Quick Disconnect, 1328769 * Antifreeze, -50C (-58F), OG6064 * Domestic Truck, OP0210 * E-Stick, 2142553 * Belt, Seat, 2" Suspension, 2061747 * 232-2686 BUCKET, 1.4 CYD, MP, W/ BOE * 219-3411 BUCKET, 12" 2.8 CFT HD * 219-3393 BUCKET, 36" 13.4 CFT HC * 282-5409 THUMB, 281-6708 TINE, A 5 * 205-5900 CVP40 COMPACTOR PLATE * Warranty: Base Warranty is 12 Months/1,500 Hours with No mileage, PLUS Powertrain & Hydraulics Extended Service Coverage out to a total of 36 Months or 5,000 Hours, whichever comes first, (No deductible), included in price and finance example. Corporate Headquarters: P.O. Box 3562, Seattle, Washington 98124 Chehalis, Fife, Mt. Vernon, Port Angeles, Seattle, Wenatchee, Yakima; Washington; Anchorage, Dutch Harbor, Fairbanks, Juneau; Alaska Mt Vernon Branch 2020 Freeway Or. I PO Box 130 Mt. Vernon, WA 98273 Packet Page 214 of 313 Cash Sale Price: $90,909 Sales/Exclse Tax(es): $7,363.63 Price Complete, FOB Our Yard: $98,272.63 We believe the equipment as quoted will exceed your expectations. On behalf of NC Machinery Co., thank you for the opportunity to quote Caterpillar machinery. Sincerely, Terry Albright Machine Sales Representative CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE: 'I accept the equipment & terms stated herewith.' Dave Sithauer This proposal is good for 30 days' Packet Page 215 of 313 AM-844 2. M. Public Health Financing Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For: Richard Marin Time: Consent Department: City Council Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Proposed Resolution supporting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Joint Select Committee on Public Health Financing. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Councilmember Richard Marin requested that this Resolution be placed on the Council Agenda for approval. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Public Health Financina Resolution Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/14/2007 11:32 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/14/2007 03:05 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/14/2007 03:42 PM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 02/14/2007 10:54 AM Final Approval Date: 02/14/2007 Packet Page 216 of 313 RESOLUTION NO. 1141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, SUPPORTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC HEALTH FINANCING. WHEREAS, in 2005, the State Legislature created the Joint Select Committee on Public Health Financing (JSC) to study and recommend alternative financing strategies for public health services, and WHEREAS, the JSC evaluated the current status of the public health system in Washington, and WHEREAS, the JSC found there are major gaps in the public health system and that the system is under -funded, and WHEREAS, the JSC concluded that public health services are essential to Washington's residents and that additional funding is needed, and WHEREAS, a dedicated funding source for public health does not exist in Washington, and state funding has not increased since 1999 and has been eroded by inflation and other rising costs, and WHEREAS, Washington is 44th in the nation in per capita spending on public health, and WHEREAS, the JSC unanimously recommends that certain core public health functions should be consistently available throughout the state, including: stopping communicable disease, promoting health, investing in healthy families, protecting against environmental health risks, and helping people access care, and WHEREAS, the JSC unanimously recommends that the state maintain its current investment in public health and provide additional investments through a stable and dedicated funding source, and WHEREAS, the JSC unanimously recommends that the state provide additional funding in the amount of $100 million annually during the `07-`09 biennium, as an initial investment, and WHEREAS, to receive the additional state funding, the 4410 Joint Select Committee recommends that local governments should be required to maintain at least their current level of funding for public health, NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Snohomish Health District Board of Health: Packet Page 217 of 313 1. Supports the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the JSC, and 2. Urges Governor Gregoire to include funding for public health in her budget, in accordance with the Joint Select Committee recommendations for stable, dedicated public health funding, and 3. Urges the Snohomish County state legislative delegation to support legislation in the 2007 session, implementing the JSC recommendations for stable, dedicated public health funding. ADOPTED this day of , 2007. MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST: CITY CLERK SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 218 of 313 AM-823 2.N. Create Two New Zones for the Edmonds Way Corridor Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Rob Chave, Planning Submitted For: Rob Chave Time: Consent Department: Planning Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Proposed Ordinance creating two new zones for the Edmonds Way Corridor. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1). Previous Council Action The City Council held a public hearing on the proposal from Tony Shapiro et. al. on January 16, 2007, and approved the addition of two new zoning classifications into the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Narrative On January 16, 2007, the City Council held a public hearing on an application by AD Shapiro/Valhalla Partners to create two new zones in the Edmonds Community Development Code for application within the Edmonds Way Corridor. After the hearing, the Council voted to approve creation of the new zones. The City Attorney has drafted an ordinance to implement the Council action. Some minor modifications have been included in the ordinance to clarify the code language, where needed, and as further noted during the hearing. The proposed ordinance - including recommended staff edits from the version proposed by the applicants - is included in Exhibit 1. The attached memo by the City Attorney (see Exhibit 2) explains the changes recommended by staff. Exhibit 3 contains a reference copy of the proposed ordinance, highlighting the changes in underline/strikeout format. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance w/ staff edits Link: Exhibit 2: City Attorney memo Link: Exhibit 3: Ordinance w/ mark-ups shown Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 04:43 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 09:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/16/2007 08:22 AM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 02/01/2007 01:59 PM Final Approval Date: 02/16/2007 Packet Page 219 of 313 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 2/l /07 R:2/14/07gjz ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.30 RM- MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL AND CHAPTER 16.50 BC - COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE CERTAIN CHANGES REGARDING ZONING REQUIREMENTS ALONG EDMONDS WAY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, on January 9, 2007, the Edmonds City Council reviewed the an application to amend the Edmonds Community Development Code in order to adjust the zoning districts for community business and multi -family residential to better recognize and accommodate the unique nature and physical constraints of the Edmonds Way entryway to the City of Edmonds; and WHEREAS, the City Council received the recommendation of its Planning Board in this regard, following a public hearing held before the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, following its own public hearing, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to amend these chapters to accommodate additional and more flexible development requirements for the Edmonds Way corridor; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended by the repeal of Chapter 16.30 RM-Multiple Residential in order to incorporate provisions relating to a new zone to read as follows: {wss651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Page 220 of 313 Chapter 16.30 RM — MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL Sections: 16.30.000 Purposes. 16.30.010 Uses. 16.30.020 Subdistricts. 16.30.030 Site development standards. 16.30.040 Site development exceptions. 16.30.000 Purposes. The RM zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for residential zones of ECDC 16.00.010 and 16.10.000: A. To reserve and regulate areas for a variety of housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in the single- family residential zone, while still maintaining a residential environment; B. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are compatible with multiple residential uses. 16.30.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Multiple dwellings; 2. Single-family dwellings; 3. Retirement homes; 4. Group homes for the disabled, foster family homes and state licensed group homes for foster care of minors; provided, however, that halfway houses and group homes licensed for juvenile offenders are not permitted uses in a residential zone of the city; 5. Boarding houses and rooming houses; 6. Housing for low income elderly in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.25 ECDC; 7. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020; {WSs651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 221 of 313 8. Primary schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 9. Local public facilities that are planned, designated, and sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 10. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. All permitted secondary uses in the RS zone, if in conjunction with a single-family dwelling; 2. Home occupations, subject to the requirements of Chapter 20.20 ECDC; 3. The keeping of one domestic animal per dwelling unit in multiple family buildings; 4. The following accessory uses: a. Private parking, b. Private swimming pools and other private recreational facilities, C. Private greenhouses covering no more than five percent of the site in total; 5. Commuter parking lots containing less than 10 designated parking spaces in conjunction with a church, school, or local public facility allowed or conditionally permitted in this zone. Any additionally designated parking spaces that increase the total number of spaces in a commuter parking lot to 10 or more shall subject the entire commuter parking lot to a conditional use permit as specified in subsection (D)(2) of this section, including commuter parking lots that are located upon more than one lot as specified in ECDC 21.15.075. C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Offices, other than local public facilities; {wss651576.Doc,1/00006.900000/) - 3 - Packet Page 222 of 313 2. Local public facilities not planned, designated, or sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 3. Day-care centers; 4. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums; 5. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033; 6. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers; 7. High schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 8. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Day-care facilities of any size to be operated in a separate, nonresidential portion of a multifamily residential dwelling structure operated primarily for the benefit of the residents thereof; 2. Commuter parking lots with 10 or more designated parking spaces in conjunction with a church, school, or local public facility allowed or conditionally permitted in this zone. 16.30.020 Subdistricts. There are established four subdistricts of the RM zone, in order to provide site development standards for areas which differ in topography, location, existing development and other factors. These subdistricts shall be known as the RM-1.5, RM - Edmonds Way (RM - EW), RM-2.4, and RM-3 zones. {wss651576.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 4 - Packet Page 223 of 313 16.30.030 Site development standards. A. Table. Minimum Lot Area Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Minimum3 Sub Per Side Rear Maximum Coverage Parking District DwellingStreet Setback Setback Setback Height g (%) (Spaces unit, Per Unit) (Sq. Ft.) RM-1.5 1,500 15' 10' 15' 2511'5 45% 2 RM-EW 1,500 15' 10' 15' 25' 5,6,7 45% 2 RM-2.4 2,400 15' 10' 15' 250'5 45% 2 RM-3 3,000 15i2 15i2 15' 25i1,5 45% 2 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. 2 RS setbacks may be used for single-family homes on lots of 10,000 square feet or less in all RM zones. 3 See Chapter 17.50 ECDC for specific parking requirements. 4 See definition of townhouse. s Maximum height for accessory structures of 15 feet. 6 The maximum base height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way may be increased to 30 feet if the following apply to the site and proposed development: (a) At least 50% of the parking for the subject building shall be enclosed inside a building or buildings; (b) The subject property is at least 5 feet lower at its lowest elevation than any adjacent residentially (R) zoned property measured at its lowest elevation; and (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based upon the physical characteristics of the property and its suitability for the technique; cost alone shall not make the use of the impact development unreasonable or unfeasible. 7 In addition to any height bonus under note 6, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the roof above the height limit, (after adding the height bonus under Note 6), provide a minimum 15% slope or pitch. B. Signs and Design Review. See Chapters 20.10 and 20.60 ECDC for regulations. {wss651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/) - 5 - Packet Page 224 of 313 C. Location of Parking. No parking spaces may be located within the street setback. D. Landscaping. In addition to the landscaping requirements set forth in Chapter 20.12 ECDC, any development in the RM - Edmonds Way zone shall retain at least 35% of the existing healthy significant trees within the side and rear setbacks of the development site. The applicant shall retain an arborist to determine the health of all significant trees within the side and rear setbacks. For the purposes of this section, significant trees shall be defined as any tree with a caliper greater than 6" measured at 4' above grade. Where it is not reasonably feasible for the applicant to retain 35% of the existing healthy significant trees within the side and rear setbacks, the applicant may replace any significant trees below the 35% threshold as follows: Each significant tree removed that reduces the percentage of retained significant healthy trees below 35% shall be replaced with three new trees, each of no less than 3" caliper measured at 4' above grade. 16.30.040 Site development exceptions. A. Housing for the Elderly. Housing projects for the elderly are eligible for special parking and density provisions. See Chapter 20.25 ECDC. B. Setback Adjustments. Chapter 20.50 ECDC contains a procedure for adjusting setback distances and locations in special situations. C. Satellite Television Antenna. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050 and reviewed by the architectural design board. D. Setback Encroachments. (1) Eaves and chimneys may project into a required setback not more than 30 inches. (2) Except as authorized by subsection (3) below, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may project into a required setback not more than one-third of the required setback, or four feet, whichever is less; provided that they are no more than 30 inches above the ground level at any point. (3) In the RM-Edmonds Way zone, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may occupy up to one-half of the required street setback area along Edmonds Way; provided that {wss651576.DOC,1/00006.900000/) - 6 - Packet Page 225 of 313 these structures or uses are located no more than 20 feet above the ground level at any point. E. Corner Lots. Corner lots shall have no rear setback; all setbacks other than street setbacks shall be side setbacks. Section 2. The Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 16.50 BC - Community Business is hereby amended to incorporate changes relating to zoning requirements along the Edmonds Way corridor to read as follows: Chapter 16.50 BC — COMMUNITY BUSINESS Sections: 16.50.000 Purposes. 16.50.010 Uses. 16.50.020 Site development standards. 16.50.030 Operating restrictions. 16.50.000 BC and BC - Edmonds Way This chapter establishes two distinct zoning categories, BC and BC - Edmonds Way. 16.50.005 Purposes. The BC and the BC - Edmonds Way zones have the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC. A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community; B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings; C. To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling unit(s) that support business uses. D. To implement the policies of the Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor. {wss651576.DOC,1/00006.900000/) - 7 - Packet Page 226 of 313 E. To meet the goals of the Growth Management Act and the City of Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for housing diversity and economical vitality. 16.50.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Single-family dwelling, as regulated in RS-6 zone; 2. Retail stores, offices and service uses, excluding intense uses, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment sales and services; 3. New automobile sales and service; 4. Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents; 5. Printing, publishing and binding establishments; 6. Bus stop shelters; 7. Community -oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the Edmonds City Code; 8. Multiple Dwelling Unit(s). This use may not be located on the ground floor of a structure; 9. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020; 10. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 11. Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 12. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. Limited assembly, repair or fabrication of goods incidental to a permitted or conditional use; {wss651576.DOC,1/00006.900000/) Packet Page 227 of 313 2. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted or conditional use; 3. Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility meeting the criteria listed under subsections (C)(11) through (14) of this section, except that the facility may also be located along a designated transit route in addition to an arterial or collector street. C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Commercial parking lots; 2. Wholesale uses; 3. Hotels and motels; 4 Amusement establishments; 5 Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions; 6. Drive-in businesses; 7. Laboratories; 8 Fabrication of light industrial products; 9. Convenience stores; 10. Day-care centers; 11. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums; 12. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033; 13. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers; 14. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted or conditional use; 2. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC. {wss651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - Packet Page 228 of 313 16.50.020 Site development standards. A. Table. Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Street Side Rear Lot Area Lot Width Height Floor Area Setback Setback Setback 3 sq. ft. per BC None None None None' None' 25 2 sq. ft. of lot area BC - 3 sq. ft. per Edmonds None None None None' None' 353° 4 sq.ft. of lot Way area ' The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings and structures entirely below the surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line adjacent to residentially (R) zoned property. 2 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height are modulated in design and are designed as a hip, gable, arch, shed or other similar roof form (see illustrations). Vertical parapet walls or flat roofs with a pitch of less than 3-in-12 are not allowed to protrude above the 25-foot height limit unless they are part of an approved modulated design. 3 The stated height limit may be increased to 40 feet provided that: (a) The street setback of any proposed building shall be increased to 4 feet in depth. Type III landscaping shall be located within this setback. This landscaping may be located immediately adjacent to the building, or may be combined with other landscaping within or adjoining the right of way. In addition, the third and forth stories of any proposed building shall be further stepped back an additional 6 feet from the street frontage along all street fronts; (b) Where the proposed development abuts a single-family residential (RS) zoned property, in addition to complying with subsection (a), the proposed development shall modulate the design of any building facades facing the single-family residentially (RS) zoned property; (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based upon the physical characteristics of the property and its suitability for the technique; cost alone shall not render the use of low impact techniques unreasonable or unfeasible. (d) The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with Type I landscaping permanently maintained by the owner of the BC lot; and {wss651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/) - 10 - Packet Page 229 of 313 (e) For any buildings fronting on Edmonds Way, the maximum height of the wall or fagade along Edmonds Way shall not exceed 45 feet as measured at the Edmonds Way property line. 4 In addition to any height bonus under note 3, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the building above the height limit (after adding the height bonus under note 3) integrate distinctive architectural features that enhance and are integrated into the overall design of the building. For purposes of this section, distinctive architectural features may include articulation, changes of materials, offsets, angles or curves of facades, or by the use of distinctive roof forms. T T ■11�'�r'��u■�■1�� I W,!!!LM ■� ■—■ =-7 ■�■MrjCW ■IF. *'','■III,, B. Ground Floor. Development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses to a minimum depth of 30 feet as measured from the street front of the building, with the following exceptions or clarifications: 1. That in all areas the provision of pedestrian access to permitted residential uses is allowed. 2. This provision shall not apply when a single-family use is the primary use on the property. {wss651576.Doc,1/00006.900000/) - 11 - Packet Page 230 of 313 3. With respect to, but only to, property located on the Fifth Avenue entrance corridor, south of Walnut Street, in which the first 60 feet of the building as measured from Fifth Avenue consists only of commercial uses; and with respect to which the subject property shares a property line with a single-family or multifamily zoned properties, then multifamily units may be located on the ground floor in such a manner that they face the adjacent residentially zoned property. 4. In the BC - Edmonds Way zone, where the street frontage of the total site proposed for development exceeds 150 feet in length, this requirement shall apply to only 60% of the ground floor street frontage of any proposed building. The remaining 40% may include any other uses permitted in the BC - Edmonds Way zone, including, but not limited to, off-street parking or live/work space. C. Signs, Parking and Design Review. See Chapters 17.50, 20.10, and 20.60 ECDC. D. Density. There is no maximum density for permitted multiple dwelling units. E. Screening. The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with trees and ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the BC lot. A six-foot minimum height fence, wall or solid hedge shall be provided at some point in the setback. F. Satellite Television Antennas. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050 and reviewed by the architectural design board. 16.50.030 Operating restrictions. A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building, except: 1. Public utilities and parks; 2. Off-street parking and loading areas, and commercial parking lots; 3. Drive-in businesses; 4. Plant nurseries; 5. Seasonal farmers' markets; {WSs651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 - Packet Page 231 of 313 6. Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.65 ECDC. B. Nuisances. All uses shall comply with Chapter 17.60 ECDC, Performance Standards. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM 1`SA0410710W04 VA 130 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {wss651576.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - Packet Page 232 of 313 On the passed Ordinance No. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, . A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.30 RM-MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL AND CHAPTER 16.50 BC -COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE CERTAIN CHANGES REGARDING ZONING REQUIREMENTS ALONG EDMONDS WAY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {wss65 t 576.Doc; 1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 233 of 313 -14- DEN ff IRHY L CE P. L. L. C. A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW MEMORANDUM DATE: February 2, 2007 TO: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Steve Bullock, Senior Planner City of Edmonds FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney RE: RM-Multiple Residential and BC -Community Business Attached are two copies of an ordinance enacting changes to Chapter 16.30 and Chapter 16.50 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. The first version is identical to the applicant's request as considered by the City Council. As we have discussed, I have concerns regarding the clarity of certain provisions. The second version of the ordinance attempts to provide some clarity and consistency that I believe is lacking. The intent of these changes is not to alter the intent of the application as approved by the Council, but to take into account Council comments regarding the enforceability and specificity of certain provisions. The draft ordinance attached shows my proposals in redline. What follows is a short summary of the changes I propose and the reasons for those changes. ECDC 16.30.010(B)(3) This is a section which was not discussed during the current process. It relates to the keeping of one domestic animal. Given other discussions ongoing in the City, I note that the original intent of this provision was to provide for "the keeping of one domestic animal per dwelling unit;" otherwise, a condominium development or apartment project would be limited to one domestic animal per lot. The purpose of this change is merely to correct a scrivener's error. ECDC 16.30.030(A). Note 5. Correct a spelling error by changing the word "if' to "of" A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 • Seattle, WA 98101-1686 • 206.447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 • Web: www.omwlaw.com rSS651528.DOC1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 234 of 313 Rob Chave, Planning Manager Steve Bullock, Senior Planner' February 2, 2007 Page 2 ECDC 16.30.030(A) Note 6 (b) The language submitted by the applicant refers to "adjacent residential property." At other points in the proposed ordinance, adjacent residential property is referred to as "residentially (R) zoned and developed property." [Application ECDC 16.50.020(A) Note 3 (b); "Residentially zoned and developed property"] Application 16.50.020(A) Note 3 (b) - second reference]; "R- zoned property" [Proposal 16.50.020(A) Note 3 (d)] As you know, when different words or phrases are used within an ordinance to refer to the same or similar subjects, they are typically interpreted by a Court to mean different things. I would suggest that we use the same term or phrase throughout. I propose using "single-family residentially zoned (RS) property." This recommendation is based on a number of factors. First, the phrase "adjacent residential property" would appear to refer to property which is zoned for residential uses or which is used as residential property. Given the changing nature of this area, it would seem that the most critical element is the long-term use of property as envisioned by the Council through the zoning ordinance. Therefore, using the City's zoning designation seems more appropriate than current use given the changing nature of the area. Second, discussion indicated concern regarding the single-family residential properties at elevation behind the property fronting Edmonds Way. This adjacent property is zoned single- family residential and is the property in which a conflict could occur. Referring to "single- family residentially zoned (RS)" property clarifies the purpose and avoids confusion regarding whether the ordinance is intended to apply to property which is or may be zoned for multi -family residential use, property in residential use or developed and residentially used property . As noted, there are multiple uses of the phrase; I will note them but will not go into detail during future citations. ECDC 16.30.030(A) Note 6 (c) This section requires the use of low -impact development techniques where "reasonably feasible." The issue which we discussed is the relative ambiguity of the phrase, particularly whether development costs are at issue. I suggest adding the following definition to both chapters to define "reasonably feasible" as a physical attribute of the property. For example, certain property soil types may not allow the use of certain techniques or vegetation in grasscrete may not be feasible due to shading, moisture or other factors. What my proposed definition would specifically exclude is consideration of costs. I suggest adding the following definition: "Reasonably feasible" means that the property is physically suited for the technique. Cost alone shall not render the use of low - impact development techniques unreasonable or unfeasible. { WSS651528.DOC1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 235 of 313 Rob Chave, Planning Manager Steve Bullock, Senior Planner' February 2, 2007 Page 3 ECDC 16.30.030(D) The language as proposed uses the phrase "side and rear ground -level setbacks" at three places in the paragraph. As you know, ground -level setbacks do not have a meaning under the Edmonds Community Development Code. Using the phrase implies something different than the standard setback calculation. I suggest either removing the words "ground -level" from this paragraph and the other sections this terminology is employed, or providing a definition to indicate how this type of setback measurement is different than the standard City setbacks. ECDC 16.50.020(A) Note 3 (a) The first sentence refers to "the ground -level street setback in any proposed development shall be increased to four feet." I suggest removing "ground level" and adding the words "...in depth" after the words "four feet" to indicate that the street setback is to be measured. Similarly, in the last sentence, I suggest adding the phrase "from the street frontage" after the words "additional six feet" to provide greater specificity regarding measurement. ECDC 16.50.020(A) Note 3 (b) Use the phrase "single-family residentially zoned (RS) property" for consistency. See prior comment. ECDC 16.50.020(A)(C) Add the definition of "reasonably feasible" referenced earlier. ECDC 16.50.020(A) Note 4 This provision requires the applicant to "integrate distinctive architectural features." As we have discussed, this is a vague and potentially unenforceable provision. We have discussed revising the last clause of the first sentence — and the following sentence — to read "...integrate distinctive architectural features that enhance and are integrated into the overall design of the building. For purposes of this section, distinctive architectural features may include articulation, changes of materials, offsets, angles or curves of facades, or by the use of distinctive roof forms." As previously noted, these proposed changes appear to be in line with the intent of the applicant and the Council's discussions. My understanding is that you will send a copy of the draft as well as this memo to Mr. Shapiro for review to determine if he objects to these changes as substantive. There is one further item which I want to call to you attention and to the Council. This concern was not discussed by the Council and any change would differ from the proposal made by Mr. { WSS651528.DOC1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 236 of 313 Rob Chave, Planning Manager Steve Bullock, Senior Planner' February 2, 2007 Page 4 Shapiro. In the proposed change to ECDC 16.50.020(B)(4) a calculation is provided to determine when additional uses may be employed on street frontages in excess of 150 feet. The point I wish to make is this: a property which develops at 150 feet or less would have required uses along all 150 feet of the property. If the property is 151 feet, the required number of square feet to be devoted to ground level uses drops to 90.6 feet. This seems to be very arbitrary and I do not understand the logic. There are a variety of ways to address this concern such as providing for percentages that relate to the length of the property over 150 feet or which provide for a flexible percentage depending upon the street frontage. I raise this issue to direct the Council's attention to it without any recommended change. WSS:gjz Attachments { WSS651528.DOC1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 237 of 313 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 2/l /07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.30 RM- MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL AND CHAPTER 16.50 BC - COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE CERTAIN CHANGES REGARDING ZONING REQUIREMENTS ALONG EDMONDS WAY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, on January 9, 2007, the Edmonds City Council reviewed the an application to amend the Edmonds Community Development Code in order to adjust the zoning districts for community business and multi -family residential to better recognize and accommodate the unique nature and physical constraints of the Edmonds Way entryway to the City of Edmonds; and WHEREAS, the City Council received the recommendation of its Planning Board in this regard, following a public hearing held before the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, following its own public hearing, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to amend these chapters to accommodate additional and more flexible development requirements for the Edmonds Way corridor; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended by the repeal of Chapter 16.30 RM-Multiple Residential in order to incorporate provisions relating to a new zone to read as follows: 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 1 - Packet Page 238 of 313 Chapter 16.30 RM — MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL Sections: 16.30.000 Purposes. 16.30.010 Uses. 16.30.020 Subdistricts. 16.30.030 Site development standards. 16.30.040 Site development exceptions. 16.30.000 Purposes. The RM zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for residential zones of ECDC 16.00.010 and 16.10.000: A. To reserve and regulate areas for a variety of housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in the single- family residential zone, while still maintaining a residential environment; B. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are compatible with multiple residential uses. 16.30.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Multiple dwellings; 2. Single-family dwellings; 3. Retirement homes; 4. Group homes for the disabled, foster family homes and state licensed group homes for foster care of minors; provided, however, that halfway houses and group homes licensed for juvenile offenders are not permitted uses in a residential zone of the city; 5. Boarding houses and rooming houses; 6. Housing for low income elderly in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.25 ECDC; 7. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020; 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 2 - Packet Page 239 of 313 8. Primary schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 9. Local public facilities that are planned, designated, and sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 10. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. All permitted secondary uses in the RS zone, if in conjunction with a single-family dwelling; 2. Home occupations, subject to the requirements of Chapter 20.20 ECDC; 3. The keeping of one domestic animal per dwelling unit in multiple family buildings; 4. The following accessory uses: a. Private parking, b. Private swimming pools and other private recreational facilities, C. Private greenhouses covering no more than five percent of the site in total; 5. Commuter parking lots containing less than 10 designated parking spaces in conjunction with a church, school, or local public facility allowed or conditionally permitted in this zone. Any additionally designated parking spaces that increase the total number of spaces in a commuter parking lot to 10 or more shall subject the entire commuter parking lot to a conditional use permit as specified in subsection (D)(2) of this section, including commuter parking lots that are located upon more than one lot as specified in ECDC 21.15.075. C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Offices, other than local public facilities; {wss651576.Doc:1/00006.900000/1 - 3 - Packet Page 240 of 313 2. Local public facilities not planned, designated, or sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 3. Day-care centers; 4. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums; 5. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033; 6. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers; 7. High schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 8. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Day-care facilities of any size to be operated in a separate, nonresidential portion of a multifamily residential dwelling structure operated primarily for the benefit of the residents thereof; 2. Commuter parking lots with 10 or more designated parking spaces in conjunction with a church, school, or local public facility allowed or conditionally permitted in this zone. 16.30.020 Subdistricts. There are established four subdistricts of the RM zone, in order to provide site development standards for areas which differ in topography, location, existing development and other factors. These subdistricts shall be known as the RM-1.5, RM - Edmonds Way (RM - EW), RM-2.4, and RM-3 zones. {wss651576.Doc:1/00006.900000/1 - 4 - Packet Page 241 of 313 16.30.030 Site development standards. A. Table. Minimum Lot Area Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Minimum3 Sub Per Side Rear Maximum Coverage Parking District DwellingStreet Setback Setback Setback Height g (%) (Spaces unit, Per Unit) (Sq. Ft.) RM-1.5 1,500 15' 10' 15' 2511'5 45% 2 RM-EW 1,500 15' 10' 15' 25' 5,6,7 45% 2 RM-2.4 2,400 15' 10' 15' 250'5 45% 2 RM-3 3,000 15i2 15i2 15' 25i1,5 45% 2 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. 2 RS setbacks may be used for single-family homes on lots of 10,000 square feet or less in all RM zones. 3 See Chapter 17.50 ECDC for specific parking requirements. 4 See definition of townhouse. s Maximum height for accessory structures iof 15 feet. 6 The maximum base height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way may be increased to 30 feet if the following apply to the site and proposed development: (a) At least 50% of the parking for the subject building shall be enclosed inside a building or buildings; (b) The subject property is at least 5 feet lower at its lowest elevation than any adjacent residentially (R) zoned property measured at its lowest elevation; and (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based upon the nhvsical characteristics of the Dronertv and its suitability for the technique, cost alone shall not make the use of the impact development unreasonable or unfeasible. 7 In addition to any height bonus under note 6, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the roof above the height limit, (after adding the height bonus under Note 6), provide a minimum 15% slope or pitch. B. Signs and Design Review. See Chapters 20.10 and 20.60 ECDC for regulations. 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 5 - Packet Page 242 of 313 C. Location of Parking. No parking spaces may be located within the street setback. D. Landscaping. In addition to the landscaping requirements set forth in Chapter 20.12 ECDC, any development in the RM - Edmonds Way zone shall retain at least 35% of the existing healthy significant trees within the side and rear gr-otmd level setbacks of the development site. The applicant shall retain an arborist to determine the health of all significant trees within the side and rear setbacks. For the purposes of this section, significant trees shall be defined as any tree with a caliper greater than 6" measured at 4' above grade. Where it is not reasonably feasible for the applicant to retain 35% of the existing healthy significant trees within the side and rear gfetffld level setbacks, the applicant may replace any significant trees below the 35% threshold as follows: Each significant tree removed that reduces the percentage of retained significant healthy trees below 35% shall be replaced with three new trees, each of no less than 3" caliper measured at 4' above grade. 16.30.040 Site development exceptions. A. Housing for the Elderly. Housing projects for the elderly are eligible for special parking and density provisions. See Chapter 20.25 ECDC. B. Setback Adjustments. Chapter 20.50 ECDC contains a procedure for adjusting setback distances and locations in special situations. C. Satellite Television Antenna. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050 and reviewed by the architectural design board. D. Setback Encroachments. (1) Eaves and chimneys may project into a required setback not more than 30 inches. (2) Except as authorized by subsection (3) below, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may project into a required setback not more than one-third of the required setback, or four feet, whichever is less; provided that they are no more than 30 inches above the ground level at any point. (3) In the RM-Edmonds Way zone, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may occupy up to one-half of the required street setback area along Edmonds Way; provided that 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 6 - Packet Page 243 of 313 these structures or uses mare located no more than 20 feet above the ground level at any point. E. Corner Lots. Corner lots shall have no rear setback; all setbacks other than street setbacks shall be side setbacks. Section 2. The Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 16.50 BC - Community Business is hereby amended to incorporate changes relating to zoning requirements along the Edmonds Way corridor to read as follows: Chapter 16.50 BC — COMMUNITY BUSINESS Sections: 16.50.000 Purposes. 16.50.010 Uses. 16.50.020 Site development standards. 16.50.030 Operating restrictions. 16.50.000 BC and BC - Edmonds Way This chapter establishes two distinct zoning categories, BC and BC - Edmonds Way. 16.50.005 Purposes. The BC and the BC - Edmonds Way zones have the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC. A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community; B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings; C. To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling unit(s) that support business uses. D. To implement the policies of the Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor. 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - % - Packet Page 244 of 313 E. To meet the goals of the Growth Management Act and the City of Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for housing diversity and economical vitality. 16.50.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Single-family dwelling, as regulated in RS-6 zone; 2. Retail stores, offices and service uses, excluding intense uses, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment sales and services; 3. New automobile sales and service; 4. Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents; 5. Printing, publishing and binding establishments; 6. Bus stop shelters; 7. Community -oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the Edmonds City Code; 8. Multiple Dwelling Unit(s). This use may not be located on the ground floor of a structure; 9. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020; 10. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 11. Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 12. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. Limited assembly, repair or fabrication of goods incidental to a permitted or conditional use; 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 Packet Page 245 of 313 2. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted or conditional use; 3. Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility meeting the criteria listed under subsections (C)(11) through (4- 14) of this section, except that the facility may also be located along a designated transit route in addition to an arterial or collector street. C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Commercial parking lots; 2. Wholesale uses; 3. Hotels and motels; 4 Amusement establishments; 5 Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions; 6. Drive-in businesses; 7. Laboratories, 8 Fabrication of light industrial products; 9. Convenience stores; 10. Day-care centers; 11. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums; 12. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033; 13. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers; 14. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted or conditional use; 1WSS651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 9 - Packet Page 246 of 313 2. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC. 16.50.020 Site development standards. A. Table. Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Street Side Rear Lot Area Lot Width Setback Setback Setback Height Floor Area 3 sq. ft. per BC None None None None' None' 25 2 sq. ft. of lot area BC - 3 sq. ft. per Edmonds None None None None' None' 353° 4 sq.ft. of lot Way area ' The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings and structures entirely below the surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line adjacent to residentially (R) zoned property. 2 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height are modulated in design and are designed as a hip, gable, arch, shed or other similar roof form (see illustrations). Vertical parapet walls or flat roofs with a pitch of less than 3-in-12 are not allowed to protrude above the 25-foot height limit unless they are part of an approved modulated design. 3 The stated height limit may be increased to 40 feet provided that: (a) The ground street setback of any proposed building shall be increased to 4 feet in depth. Type III landscaping shall be located within this setback. This landscaping may be located immediately adjacent to the building, or may be combined with other landscaping within or adjoining the right of way. In addition, the third and forth stories of any proposed building shall be further stepped back an additional 6 feet from the street frontage along all street fronts; (b) Where the proposed development abuts a single-family esidentiall-y (RS) zoned and developedproperty, in addition to complying with subsection (a), the proposed development shall modulate the design of any building facades facing the single-family esidentially (RS) zoned and developed (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based unon the nhvsical characteristics of the nronerty and its suitability for the technique_ cost alone shall not render the use of low impact techniques unreasonable or unfeasible. {wss651576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 10 - Packet Page 247 of 313 (d) The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with Type I landscaping permanently maintained by the owner of the BC lot; and (e) For any buildings fronting on Edmonds Way, the maximum height of the wall or fagade along Edmonds Way shall not exceed 45 feet as measured at the Edmonds Way property line. 4 In addition to any height bonus under note 3, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the building above the height limit (after adding the height bonus under note 3) integrate distinctive architectural features that enhance and are integrated into the overall design of the building. For purposes of this section, distinctive architectural features may include articulation, changes of materials, offsets, angles or curves of facades, or by the use of distinctive roof forms. f MNIPM Of {i OMM No Qmtm ; F 1'P min' j a , - -�-- 7w. 7-- -!i B. Ground Floor. Development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses to a minimum depth of 30 feet as measured from the street front of the building, with the following exceptions or clarifications: 1. That in all areas the provision of pedestrian access to permitted residential uses is allowed. {wss65 f 576.DOC:1/00006.900000/1 - 11 - Packet Page 248 of 313 2. This provision shall not apply when a single-family use is the primary use on the property. 3. With respect to, but only to, property located on the Fifth Avenue entrance corridor, south of Walnut Street, in which the first 60 feet of the building as measured from Fifth Avenue consists only of commercial uses; and with respect to which the subject property shares a property line with a single-family or multifamily zoned properties, then multifamily units may be located on the ground floor in such a manner that they face the adjacent residentially zoned property. 4. In the BC - Edmonds Way zone, where the street frontage of the total site proposed for development exceeds 150 feet in length, this requirement shall apply to only 60-% of the ground floor street frontage of any proposed building. The remaining 40% may include any other uses permitted in the BC - Edmonds Way zone, including, but not limited to, off-street parking or live/work space. C. Signs, Parking and Design Review. See Chapters 17.50, 20.10, and 20.60 ECDC. D. Density. There is no maximum density for permitted multiple dwelling units. E. Screening. The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with trees and ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the BC lot. A six-foot minimum height fence, wall or solid hedge shall be provided at some point in the setback. F. Satellite Television Antennas. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050 and reviewed by the architectural design board. 16.50.030 Operating restrictions. A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building, except: 1. Public utilities and parks; 2. Off-street parking and loading areas, and commercial parking lots; 3. Drive-in businesses; {wss651576.Doc:1/00006.900000/1 - 12 - Packet Page 249 of 313 4. Plant nurseries; 5. Seasonal farmers' markets; 6. Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.65 ECDC. B. Nuisances. All uses shall comply with Chapter 17.60 ECDC, Performance Standards. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {wss651576.Doca/00006.900000/1 - 13 - Packet Page 250 of 313 On the passed Ordinance No. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, . A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 16.30 RM-MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL AND CHAPTER 16.50 BC -COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE CERTAIN CHANGES REGARDING ZONING REQUIREMENTS ALONG EDMONDS WAY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE 1 W SS651576.DOC:1 /00006.900000/1 Packet Page 251 of 313 -14- AM-851 2.0. BD Zone in Other Provisions of the Code Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Rob Chave, Planning Submitted For: Rob Chave Time: Consent Department: Planning Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Proposed Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code Sections 17.50.040(B); 17.50.070(B); 17.75.010; 17.75.020; 20.50.040(B); 20.50.050(C); 20.50.060(C); 20.60.005; 20.60.025; 20.60.030; 20.60.035; 20.60.045 (B); and 20.60.080 in order to provide for the creation of the BD Zone in other provisions of the Code now referencing the BC or Central Business Zone. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1). Previous Council Action The City Council approved the new downtown business (BD) zones on January 16, 2007. Narrative In establishing the new downtown business (BD) zones in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), there remains a need to update other references in the ECDC to assure that provisions that have applied to the BC zone now also apply to the BD -zoned areas. These references range from provisions regarding outdoor dining to signage to wireless facilities. The proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1) is intended to update the appropriate ECDC references without changing the substance of the regulations. Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 04:16 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 09:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/16/2007 08:22 AM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 02/15/2007 01:52 PM Final Approval Date: 02/16/2007 Packet Page 252 of 313 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 1/30/07 2/15/07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS 17.50.040(B); 17.50.070(B); 17.75.010; 17.75.020; 20.50.040(B); 20.50.050(C); 20.50.060(C); 20.60.005; 20.60.025; 20.60.030; 20.60.035; 20.60.045 (B); AND 20.60.080 IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF THE BD ZONE IN OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CODE NOW REFERENCING THE BC OR CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has created a new downtown business district; and WHEREAS, at various places throughout the Edmonds Community Development Code, there are frequent references to the Central Business District and/or BC or Central Business Zone; and and WHEREAS, the BD zone replaces the BC zone in the Central Business District; WHEREAS, these corrections are necessary in order to incorporate the new zone terminology and are without substantive effect, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code, Section 17.50.040 Location paragraph (B) All Other Uses is hereby amended to read as follows: {WSS65I281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Page 253 of 313 17.50.040 Location. B. All other uses. Off street parking shall be located within three hundred (300) feet walking distance of the use for which it is required, except that the only requirement of the location of off street parking required for use in the downtown business area shall be that such parking be located within the downtown business area. If the off street parking is not in the same lot as the use for which it is required, the owner or lessor shall provide an agreement to the City for recording with the County Auditor which specifies: 1. The location, by legal description or survey, of the off street parking and the use for which it is required; and 2. A restriction on the property designated for off street parking specifying that it may not be used for any other purpose unless the parking is no longer required for the use specified in sub section (B)(1) of this section. Section 2. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 17.50.070 Downtown business area parking requirements, Section (B) Downtown business area defined is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.50.070 Downtown business area parking requirements. B. Downtown business area defined. The downtown business area consists of all land zoned BC, BD or CW and located in the area east of Puget Sound, south of Edmonds Street, west of 7th Avenue, and north of Pine Street. For the purposes of Chapter 17.50 ECDC only, the downtown business area shall include all commercially zoned properties within the specified boundaries. Section 3. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 17.75.010 Outdoor dining - permitted secondary use is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.75.010 Outdoor dining - permitted secondary use. Limited outdoor seating for outdoor dining is hereby allowed as a permitted secondary use in the BN-Neighborhood Business Zone, {WSS65I281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} -2- Packet Page 254 of 313 BC -Community Business Zone, BD -Downtown Business Zone, CW-Commercial Waterfront Zone, and CG-General Commercial Zone. Seating shall be limited to an additional 10% of the existing interior seating of the establishment or eight (8) seats, whichever is greater, and shall be located outside of public rights of way. No additional parking stalls shall be required for outdoor dining usage. Section 4. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 17.75.020 Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit is hereby amended to read as follows: 17.75.020 Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit. Outdoor dining shall be a primary use requiring a conditional use permit in the BN-Neighborhood Business Zone, BC -Community Business Zone, BD -Downtown Business Zone, CW-Commercial Waterfront Zone, and CG-General Commercial Zone, for outdoor seating which exceeds 10% of the existing interior seating in the establishment or more than eight (8) seats, whichever is greater. This use shall be established and maintained only in accordance with the terms of the Conditional Use Permit approved by the staff under the staff decision (notice required) process established pursuant to ECDC 20.95.050. At a minimum, the conditions considered for imposition by the staff may include a restriction on operating hours, location of the outdoor seating, and/or buffering of the noise and visual impacts relating to the outdoor dining seating. All seating permitted pursuant to the Conditional Use Permit shall be located outside of public rights of way. If outdoor seating is approved under these provisions, no additional parking stalls shall be required for the outdoor dining. Section 5. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.50.040(B) is hereby amended to add a reference to the BD zone to read as follows: 20.50.040 Development standards for monopole 1. B. Monopole facilities are permitted in business (BC, BD and BN zones) and certain public and open space sites (i.e., Woodway High School, Edmonds High School and Five Corners Watertank/Fire Station 6) with a conditional use permit. {wss651281.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 3 - Packet Page 255 of 313 Section 6. The Edmonds Community Development Section 20.50.050(C) Development standards for monopole II, paragraph C, is hereby amended to add a reference to the BD zone to read as follows: 20.50.050 Development standards for monopole II. C. Monopole facilites are not permitted in residential (RS and RM) zones, business (BC, BD and BN) zones, commercial waterfront (CW) zone, open space (OS) zone, public (P) zones, except where expressly provided for in this chapter. Section 7. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.50.060 Development standards for lattice towers, (C) is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.50.060 Development standards for lattice towers. C. Monopole II facilities are not permitted in residential (RS and RM) zones, business (BN, BD and BC) zones, commercial waterfront (CW) zone, open space (OS) zone and public (P) zones, except where expressly provided for in this chapter. Section 8. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.60.005 Definitions to amend the definition of "premises", to read as follows: 20.60.005 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: A. "Attached sign" is any sign attached or affixed to a building. Attached signs include wall signs, projecting signs, and window signs. B "Campaign sign" is a temporary sign displaying a message relating to a candidate, political party, or issue that is registered or certified for an upcoming election. {wss651281.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 4 - Packet Page 256 of 313 C. "Commercial sign" is a sign displayed for the purpose of identifying a commercial use, or advertising a service, product, business or venture that is offered for trade or sale. D. "Construction sign" is any permanent or temporary sign displayed on premises where any physical excavation, construction, demolition, rehabilitation, structural alteration or related work is currently occurring, pursuant to a valid building permit. E. "Fixed sign" is any sign attached or affixed to the ground or any structure in such a manner so as to provide for continuous display for an extended or indeterminable period of time. Fixed signs include, but are not limited to, freestanding signs and wall signs. F. "Freestanding sign" is any sign that is not attached or affixed to a building. G. "Governmental sign" is a sign that is necessary to protect the public health and safety. Governmental signs include traffic signs, directional and informational signs for public health and safety facilities, and warning or hazard signs. H. "Group sign" is a sign or signs on one sign structure serving two or more businesses sharing a parking facility. I. "Identification structure" is a structure intended to attract the attention of the public to a site, without the use of words or symbols identifying the business. Examples include fountains, sculptures, awnings, and totem poles. J. "Marquee sign" is any sign attached or made part of a building marquee. A marquee sign is a form of projecting sign. K. "Noncommercial sign" is a sign that is intended to display a religious, charitable, cultural, governmental, informational, political, educational, or artistic message, that is not primarily associated with a good, product, or service offered for sale or trade. Noncommercial signs include signs advertising incidental and temporary commercial activities conducted by churches and nonprofit businesses, clubs, groups, associations, or organizations. L "Off -premises sign" is any sign that advertises or relates to a good, product, service, event, or meeting that is offered, sold, traded, provided, or conducted at some location or premises other than that upon which the sign is posted or displayed. Off -premises {WSS65I281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Page 257 of 313 signs include all signs posted or displayed in the public right of way. M. "On -premises sign" is any sign that advertises or relates to a good, product, service, event, or meeting that is lawfully permitted to be offered, sold, traded, provided, or conducted at the location or premises upon which the sign is posted or displayed. On -premises signs also include signs not related to any particular location or premises, such as signs displaying religious, charitable, cultural, governmental, informational, political, educational, or artistic messages that are intentionally displayed by the owner of the property or premises upon which the sign is displayed. N. "Permanent sign" is a fixed or portable sign intended for continuous or intermittent display for periods exceeding 60 days in any calendar year. O. "Portable sign" is any sign that is readily capable of being moved or removed, whether attached or affixed to the ground or any structure that is typically intended for temporary display. Portable signs include, but are not limited to: 1. Signs designed and constructed with a chassis or support with or without wheels; 2. Menu and "sandwich" board signs; 3. A" and "T" frame signs; 4. Wooden, metal, or plastic "stake" or "yard" signs; 5. Posters or banners affixed to windows, railings, overhangs, trees, hedges, or other structures or vegetation; 6. Signs mounted upon vehicles parked and visible from the public right of way, except signs identifying the related business when the vehicle is being used in the normal day to day operation of the business, and except for signs advertising for sale the vehicle upon which the sign is mounted; 7. Searchlights; 8. Inflatables. P. "Premises" is the actual physical area of the lot upon which a sign is posted and displayed, except within the boundaries of the BC or BD zone in the downtown activity center as defined in the Comprehensive Plan where "premises" shall include any portion of the public sidewalk which fronts upon the lot. Q. "Projecting sign" is any sign attached or affixed to a building or wall in such a manner that its leading edge extends more than 12 inches beyond the surface of such building or wall. {WSS65I281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - Packet Page 258 of 313 R. "Real estate sign" is a sign displaying a message relating to the sale or rent of real property. S. "Sign" is any structure, device of fixture that is visible from a public place that incorporates graphics, symbols, or written copy for the purposes of conveying a particular message to public observers, including wall graphics or identification structures. T. "Sign area" is the maximum actual area of a sign that is visible from any single point of observation from any public vantage point. Supporting structures which are part of a sign display shall be included in the calculation of the sign area. U. "Temporary sign" is an allowed portable sign intended for short-term display, not to exceed 60 calendar days in any calendar year. V. "Wall graphic" is a wall sign in which color and form, and without the use of words, is a part of the overall design on the building(s) in which the business is located. A wall graphic may be painted or applied (not to exceed one-half inch in thickness) to a building as a part of its overall color and design, but may not be internally lighted. Internally lighted assemblies, including those which project from the wall of the structure, or which are located on any accessory structure on the site, shall be considered wall signs and comply with the requirements of this chapter. W. "Wall sign" is a sign that is attached or affixed to a wall and that is parallel to and not projecting more than 12 inches at any angle from such wall. "Wall signs" include signs that are painted directly upon a wall. X. "Window sign" is a sign that is attached or affixed to a window, or a sign displayed within 24 inches of the inside of a window in such a manner as to be visible from any public place. Section 9. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.60.025 Total Maximum permanent sign area, (A) Business and Commercial Zone Districts is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.60.025 Total maximum permanent sign area. A. Business and Commercial Zone Districts (BN, BC, BD, CW and CG). {WSS651281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - % - Packet Page 259 of 313 1. The maximum total permanent sign area for allowed or permitted uses in the BN, BC, BD and CW zone shall be one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of wall containing the main public entrance to the primary building or structure located upon a separate legal lot. 2. The maximum total permanent sign area for allowed or permitted uses in the CG zone shall be one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of building frontage along a public street and/or along a side of the building containing the primary public entrance to a maximum of 200 square feet. The allowable sign area shall be computed separately for each qualifying building frontage, and only the sign area derived from that frontage may be oriented along that frontage. Sign areas for wall -mounted signs may not be accumulated to yield a total allowable sign area greater than that permitted upon such frontage, except that businesses choosing not to erect a freestanding sign may use up to 50 percent of their allowable freestanding sign area for additional attached sign area. Use of the additional area shall be subject to the review of the architectural design board. 3. The maximum total permanent sign area may be divided between wall, projecting, and freestanding signs, in accordance with regulations and maximum sign area and height for each type of sign, as provided in ECDC 20.60.030 through 20.60.050. Window signs meeting the requirements of ECDC 20.60.035 do not count against the total permanent sign area permitted. 4. The maximum number of permitted permanent signs is three per site, or one per physically enclosed business space on commercial sites with multiple business tenants, whichever is greater. The total sign area of all signs permitted on -site must also comply with the maximum total permanent sign area specified in this chapter. Section 10. The Edmonds Community Development Code, Section 20.60.030 Wall signs - Maximum area and height is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.60.030 Wall signs -Maximum area and height. A. The maximum area of wall sign shall be as follows: {WSS65I281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 - Packet Page 260 of 313 Zone Maximum Area of Sign RS, RM 4 square feet BN, BC, BD, CW, CG 1 square foot per lineal foot of attached wall B. The maximum height of any attached sign shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Height of Sign RS, RM 6 feet BN, BC, BD, CW, CG 14 feet or the height of the face of the building on which the sign is located, consistent with ECDC 20.60.020(A) Section 11. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.60.035 Window signs - Maximum area is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.60.035 Window signs - Maximum area. A. The maximum area of any window sign shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Area of Sign RS, RM 4 square feet BN, BC, BD, CW, CG 1 square foot per each lineal foot of window frontage Section 12. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.60.040 Projecting signs - Maximum area and height restrictions is hereby amended to read as follows: A. The maximum area of any projecting sign shall be as follows: {WSS65I281.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - Packet Page 261 of 313 Zone Maximum Area of Sign RS, RM Not permitted BN, BC, BD, CW 16 square feet CG 32 square feet B. The maximum height of any projecting sign shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Height of Sign RS, RM Not permitted BN, BC, BD, CW, CG 14 feet C. The bottom of the sign area of projecting signs shall be at least eight feet in height and at least 11 feet in height if it projects over a vehicle traveled right-of-way. The sign area of a marquee sign may not exceed two feet in vertical dimension. Section 13. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.60.045 Freestanding signs - Regulations (B) Maximum area and (D) Maximum height is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.60.045 Freestanding signs - Regulations. B. Maximum Area. The maximum area of a freestanding sign shall be as follows: {wss651281.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 10 - Packet Page 262 of 313 Zone Maximum Area of Sign RS, RM 10 square feet (subdivision, PRD, multifamily) 4 square feet (individual residence sign) BN 24 square feet (single) 48 s uare feet(group) BC, BD 32 square feet (single) 48 s uare feet(group) CW 32 square feet (single) 48 s uare feet(group) CG Sign area shall be governed by subsection C of this section D. Maximum Height. The maximum sign height of freestanding signs shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Height of Sign RS, RM 6 feet BN, BC, BD, CW 14 feet CG 25 feet Section 14. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.60.080 Temporargns (A) On -Premises Temporary Signs is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.60.080 Temporary signs. A. On -Premises Temporary Signs. On -premises temporary signs are permitted in residential and commercial zones, in addition to any allowed or permitted permanent signage, subject to the following restrictions and standards: 1. Residential Zones (RS, RM) a. Only portable, freestanding or attached signs may be used as temporary signage. {wss651281.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 11 - Packet Page 263 of 313 b. Commercial on -premises temporary signage is not permitted, except for real estate signs as defined by ECDC 20.60.065. C. Maximum number is one attached of freestanding sign. 2. Commercial Zones (BN, BC, BD, CW, CG) a. Only portable, freestanding or attached signs may be used for temporary signage; provided, that "sandwich board" or "A" frame portable signs shall only be permitted in the BC, BD, and CW zones. b. Maximum duration of display is 60 days in any calendar year for the cumulative posting of all temporary commercial signage upon each commercial location or premises. C. Maximum number of temporary signs is one freestanding sign per property street frontage; and one attached sign per building. 3. The total maximum area of on -premises temporary signage shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Area of Temporary Sign RS, RM 6 square feet BN, BC, BD, CW 20 square feet CG 30 square feet 4. The total maximum area for each allowed on -premises temporary sign shall be as follows Zone Maximum Area of Temporary Sign RS, RM 6 square feet (freestanding and attached) BN, BC, BD, CW 6 square feet (freestanding 20 s uare feet attached CG 6 square feet (freestanding) 30 s uare feet attached {wss651281.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 12 - Packet Page 264 of 313 5. The maximum height of any allowed on -premises temporary sign shall be as follows: Zone Maximum Height of Sign RS, RM 6 feet (freestanding and attached) BN, BC, BD, CW, CG 3 feet (freestanding) 14 feet attached 6. In no case shall temporary signage be posted, located, or displayed in violation of the regulations for permanent signs set forth in ECDC 20.60.020 through 20.60.050. Section 15. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {wss651281.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 13 - Packet Page 265 of 313 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS 17.50.040(B); 17.50.070(B); 17.75.010; 17.75.020; 20.50.040(B); 20.50.050(C); 20.50.060(C); 20.60.005; 20.60.025; 20.60.030; 20.60.035; 20.60.045 (B); and 20.60.080 IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF THE BD ZONE IN OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CODE NOW REFERENCING THE BC OR CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS651281.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 14 - Packet Page 266 of 313 AM-853 3. Arby's Restaurant Award Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Linda Carl, Mayor's Office Submitted For: Gary Haakenson Time: 5 Minutes Department: Mayor's Office Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Recognition of "Excellence Award" for safe food handling received by Arby's Restaurant. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative On Tuesday, February 13, 2007, William and Robert Beye, the owners of Arby's Restaurant, located at 8425 244th St. SW, were presented an "Excellence Award" for food safety from the Snohomish Health District. More than 3,000 food -service establishments in the county were inspected by a 20-member food advisory panel. Arby's Restaurant received the award in the "fast-food establishment" category. Councilmember Richard Marin represents Edmonds on the Snohomish Health District Board. At Councilmember Marin's request, a letter of congratulations from Mayor Haakenson was sent to the owners of Arby's. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Health District press release Link: Letter from Mayor Haakenson Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:51 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 03:13 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 03:14 PM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl Started On: 02/15/2007 02:25 PM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 267 of 313 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION DIVISION 3020 Rucker Avenue, Suite 206 Everett, WA 98201-3900 425,339,5210 fax:425.339.5216 tty:425.339.5252 www,snohd.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Suzanne Pate, 425.339.8704 February 13, 2007 spate(r shd.snohomish.wa.gov 17th annual "Excellence Awards" for food safety, Feb. 13 Snohomish Health District commends local businesses for safe food handling SNOHOMISH COUNTY- Food safety is a major ingredient in the Board of Health's agenda at its February meeting. Snohomish hlealth District will recognize local food establishments for excellence in handling food safely, presenting "Excellence Award" plaques to t.hc winners in six categories in a ceremony "Tuesday, Feb. 13, in the Snohomish Health District auditorium, 3020 Rucker Ave., Everett. The meeting will begin at 3 p.m. and is open to the public. "We applaud these facilities for their leadership and consistent attention to preparing food safely," said Rick Zahalka, program manager for Snohomish Health District's Food and Living Environment section. "Food safety is basic to preventing many communicable diseases," he said, "and Fin proud to recognize these winners as our partners in fulfilling this public health function in Snohomish County." Snohomish Health District created the Excellence Awards program in 1990 as a positive reinforcement of its restaurant and food service inspection program. The public health agency's nine food facility inspectors work with. more than 3,000 food service establishments in the county from espresso stands and taco wagons to sit-down restaurants with complex menus. It also monitors food preparation at nearly 750 temporary facilities at 25 Local fairs and festivals in the summer months. Each operation must meet strict health standards for sanitation to maintain its permit. A 20-member food advisory panel of industry peers considered 18 food service establishments that were nominated by Health District inspectors. The panel includes restaurant owners, operators, and chefs. Excellence Award categories and winners are: Full Menu Establishment -- Saigon Kitchen, 19602 State Route 2, Monroe; Kien 'fu, owner Fast Service Establishment ---Arby's Restaurant #769, 8425 244°i St SW, Edmonds; William and Robert Beye, owners Limited 11')<enu Establislinient --- Kenivanda Cafe, 14030 Kcnwanda Dr, Snohomish; Curtis and Vicki Creighton, owners Grocery Store --- Haggen. Food and Pharmacy, 13711 88"' St NE, Marysville; Haggen Incorporated, owner, Ed Tidwell, store manager Schoolliixdustr•y/Iiistitutioti -- Mukilteo School District Central Kitchen, 8925 Airport Road, Everett; Chris Lutgen, nutrition services supervisor Temporary Food Establishment — I-Ioly Jalal)elio, Judie Schaefer, owner MORE... Packet Page 268 of 313 FOOD AWARDS MEDIA RELEASE Snohomish Health District February 13, 2007 Page 2 of 2 The Snohomish health District food program also is an award -winner itself, twice the recipient of the Crumbine Consumer Protection Award --a prestigious honor given by the national Foodscrvicc and Packaging Institute to local food protection programs. In addition to inspecting food facilities, the Health District offers classroom training for food workers and managers. For more information about the Food and Living Environment program at Snohomish Health District, call 425.339.5279. You also can check this information line to hear a sclhedulc of classes to qualify for a. food handler card; 425.339.5260. Established in 1959, the Snohomish Health District works for a safer and healthier community through disease prevention, health promotion, and protection from environmental threats. hind more information about local public health programs and services at www.snohd.or . ##END### Packet Page 269 of 313 CITY OF EDMONDS CITY HALL • THIRD FLOOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0247 • FAX (425) 771.0252 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Inc.18`�d February 15, 2007 William and Robert Beye, Owners Arby's Restaurant 8425 244"' St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear William and Robert, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Congratulations on receiving the Snohomish Health Districts' "Excellence Award" in food - handling safety at their awards ceremony on Tuesday, February 13. This award is testament to your conscientiousness as business owners and your high standards in maintaining a quality establishment. I'm extremely proud to have your restaurant in the city of Edmonds, and am pleased to lmow that the hard work of you and your employees was recognized as an industry leader. I extend my sincere congratulations on achieving this remarkable accomplishment. Sincerely, Gary Haakenson Mayor GHllbc C:1Mayor071ArUy'sRestau rantAward.doe Packet Page 270 of 313 Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan AM-841 Municipal Code Title 7 Utility Billing Update Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Kathleen Junglov, Administrative Services Time: 15 Minutes Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Finance Committee: Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Agenda Memo Subiect Title Municipal Code Title 7 Utility Billing Update. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve attached Ordinance. Previous Council Action Finance Committee 11/14/06 - Councilmembers Olson and Wambolt Finance Committee 1/9/07 - Councilmembers Orvis and Wambolt 4. Narrative Title 7 of the Municpal code pertains to Utility Charges and Regulations. Certain sections of this chapter were outdated and required updating. Most of the changes were small housekeeping items, however two of the changes are signigicant departures from current practice. #1. The code never allowed for suspension of billing for vacant homes, however this has been the practice. Direction from the Finance Committee members is to follow code and no longer suspend billing for homes vacant longer than 60 days. The base rate of approximately $90.00 for a two month billing cycle will be billed. This will impact approximately 50 of our 11,000 single family accounts. Additionally, there will be a $20.00 charge to turn off the water, and $20.00 when the water is turned back on. #2. Begin charging deliquency charges on all accounts. Currently storm and sewer only, and commercial accounts are not being charged deliquency charges. According to the City Attorney, it is an allowable practice to treat certain classes of accounts differently, however the reason for doing so must be stated. Current staff are not aware of the reason why these classes are being treated differently. Most commercial accounts are in a single route and billed monthly. To implement this change, these accounts will be incorporated into other routes and billed every two months. Link: Utility Code Update Ordinance Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 11:02 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 01:21 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 01:37 PM APRV Form Started By: Kathleen Junglov Started On: 02/13/2007 11:17 AM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 271 of 313 service; and ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 7.10 ECC ON WATER SERVICE, ECC 7.30.070 ON WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE REDUCTIONS FOR LOW INCOME CITIZENS, ECC 7.40.040 ON MONTHLY FIRE SERVICE CHARGES, REPEALING ECC 3.50.030 ON DELINQUENCY CHARGE, ADOPTING ECC 7.10.025 ON DELINQUENCY CHARGE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, City of Edmonds provides water, sewer and stormwater utility WHEREAS, procedural requirements by City water, sewer and stormwater customers for supplemental services in connection with water, sewer and stormwater utilities need to be updated; and WHEREAS, certain fees and charges related to supplemental services in connection with water, sewer and stormwater utilities need to be updated; and WHEREAS, water and sewer customers whose services are scheduled to be shut off due to delinquency should be afforded an opportunity to show that the delinquent charges have been paid; and WHEREAS, delinquency charges should apply equally to all water, sewer and stormwater accounts; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 272 of 313 Page 1 of 8 repealed. Section 1. Edmonds City Code 3.050.030, Delinquency charge. is hereby Section 2. Edmonds City Code 7.10.010, Application for water use. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.10.010 Application for water use. All applications for the use of water shall be made at the development services department by the owner, or by the owner's authorized agent, on printed forms furnished by said department for that purpose, and shall contain the name and description of the lot, block and addition. The applicant shall state the purposes for which the water is to be used and shall agree to conform to the ordinances, rules, and regulations, with modification which may be adopted, as a condition for use of water. Section 3. Edmonds City Code 7.10.020, Accounts - Payments. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.10.020 Accounts — Payments. A. All accounts shall be kept in the name of the owner, and all charges shall be made against the property as well as the owner thereof. No change of ownership or occupancy shall affect the application of this section. All bills are payable within 25 days from the billing date. If water bills are not paid within a stated period, the water will be shut off. Water will be turned on after payment of the fees as set forth in ECC 7.10.070, in addition to the amount of delinquent charges. B. At least 10 days before water is scheduled to be shut off, the Administrative Services Director, or a designated city official, shall notify the owner and the occupant of the property. The owner shall be notified by mail at the address on the account, and the occupant shall be notified by mail, door hanger or other form at the property. Mailed notices shall be deemed received 3 business days after mailing. All notices shall contain the following: 1. Reason for water shut off; L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 273 of 313 Page 2 of 8 2. Delinquent amount that needs to be paid to avert interruption in water service; 3. Instructions on scheduling a hearing to show that the account is not delinquent; and 4. The day on or after which water will be shut off. C. After notification, the owner and the occupant shall be afforded the opportunity to present to the Administrative Service Director, or a designated official, evidence that the delinquent charges have been paid. Such opportunity shall be afforded before the water is shut off, provided that the owner or the occupant make a request for the same to the Administrative Service Director, or a designated official, within 3 days of presumptive receipt of the notice. The burden shall be on the owner and or occupant to prove that the delinquent charges have been paid. D. After reviewing the evidence by the owner and or occupant, the Administrative Service Director, or the designated official to whom the evidence was presented, shall decide whether or not the account remains delinquent. The owner and the occupant shall be notified of the decision, and this decision shall not be subject to further appeal. If the account is found to be delinquent and water has not been shut off, water will be shut off as previously scheduled or 3 days after final decision, whichever date is later. If the account is not found to be delinquent and water has been shut off, water will be turned on without being subject to turn on and turn off charges in ECC 7.10.070. Section 4. A new section in Chapter 7.10 Edmonds City Code, ECC 7.10.025, Delinquency charge., is hereby adopted to read as follows: 7.10.025 Delinquency charge. A charge equal to 10 percent of the outstanding balance of the delinquent utility bill shall be added as a fee, except in cases of extraordinary hardship as determined by the administrative services director or his/her designee. The decision of the administrative services director can be appealed to the finance committee of the Edmonds city council. The account shall be considered delinquent 35 days after the sending of the regular billing. Such delinquency notice and billing will be provided 35 days following the mailing of a regular utility bill. This charge shall be applicable to all delinquent utility billing accounts. In order to be considered delinquent an account must total $21.00 or more of delinquency, and no delinquency charge shall be levied L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 274 of 313 Page 3 of 8 against any delinquent account under $21.00. This delinquency charge shall be paid prior to the application of any payment against the fee or charge initially assessed and nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the city's collection of its attorneys' fees and other reasonable costs and charges in the event it is forced to seek judicial remedy for collection. Section 5. Edmonds City Code 7.10.030, Suspension of water use - Procedure. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.10.030 Suspension of water use — Procedure. Should a customer desire to discontinue the use of water for a period of time, notice thereof must be given to the utility billing department. The water will then be shut off and turned on again upon notice to the utility billing department. The customer shall be required to pay charges as set forth in ECC 7.10.070. Section 6. Edmonds City Code 7.10.070, Turn on and turn off charges. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.10.070 Turn on and turn off charges. The charge for turning on or off the water other than at the main shall be $20.00 if done during regular working hours. If the water is turned on or off at any time other than during regular working hours, the charge shall be $75.00. Section 7. Edmonds City Code 7.10.080, Request for inspection of meters. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.10.080 Request for inspection of meters. The water division, upon the request of any water user, shall inspect the water meter on the user's premises. A deposit of $20.00 shall be made with such request to cover the cost of such inspection. In the event such meter is found to be overregistering, such deposit shall be returned to the depositor; otherwise, said deposit shall be retained by the city. Section 8. Edmonds City Code 7.10.110, Charge and bill adjustments. is hereby amended to read as follows: L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 275 of 313 Page 4 of 8 7.10.110 Charge and bill adjustments. The administrative services director, or such authorized representative as he may designate, is authorized to make adjustments or corrections to billings for any charge for water service, including but not limited to connection charges, minimum monthly billings, meter charges, penalty and special charges, improperly charged rates, and, subject to the City Council's approval, the cancellation of uncollectible bills and accounts. Section 9. Subsection C of Edmonds City Code 7.30.070, Water and sewer rate reductions for low income citizens. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizens. A. Definitions. For the purposes of implementing water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions under the provisions of this section, the following words or phrases shall have the following definitions: 1. "Low income citizen" shall mean a person who has established Edmonds as their residence and whose total disposable income including that of his or her spouse or cotenant does not exceed the amount specified in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b) as the same exists or is hereafter amended. 2. The definition of terms such as "residence", "total disposable income", "combined disposable income", and other such terms used in this section shall be given those meanings established by RCW 84.36.383 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. In the event that any provision of the Revised Code of Washington incorporated by reference or implication in this definitional section shall be amended, such amendment shall be deemed to be incorporated within or utilized in interpretation of this section. B. Low income citizens shall be given reductions in the water, sewer and stormwater rates as those rates are established from time to time by the city council: 1. A rate reduction of 30 percent shall be afforded those low income citizens who meet the qualifying income and asset levels established by RCW 84.36.381(5)(b)(i) as the same exists or shall hereafter be amended. 2. A 50 percent rate reduction shall be afforded those low income citizens qualifying under the provisions of RCW 84.36.381 (5)(b)(ii). 3. No rate reduction shall be afforded to any person shown as a dependent on the income tax return of any other individual, whether or not such person resides at the location for which the L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 276 of 313 Page 5 of 8 rate reduction is sought, unless the total combined disposable income of the applicant, along with their spouse, cotenant and all family members shown on the income tax return in which the applicant is shown as a dependent, meets the standards established by this section. C. The administrative services director is authorized to establish an application for low income citizens rate reduction applications. The application shall be provided without cost by the utility billing division of the city and shall include such information, as may reasonably be required by the administrative services director to verify eligibility. Section 10. Subsection A of Edmonds City Code 7.40.040, Fire service monthly service charges. is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.40.040 Fire service monthly service charges. A. The monthly rates for inspection and maintenance of detector check systems are fixed as follows: Fire Service Bimonthly or Detector Service Charge Meter Size Up to 4" $12.34 6" $21.59 8" $30.81 Water used through the fire service line for fire suppression purposes and limited testing of the system will normally be furnished without any charge in addition to the bimonthly minimum charge set forth for fire service meter or detector check meter. Section 11. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 277 of 313 Page 6 of 8 Section 12. Effective Date. This ordinance, constituting administrative acts of the City Council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0042_841_Utility Code Update Ord.DOC Packet Page 278 of 313 Page 7 of 8 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 7.10 ECC ON WATER SERVICE, ECC 7.30.070 ON WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE REDUCTIONS FOR LOW INCOME CITIZENS, ECC 7.40.040 ON MONTHLY FIRE SERVICE CHARGES, REPEALING ECC 3.50.030 ON DELINQUENCY CHARGE, ADOPTING ECC 7.10.025 ON DELINQUENCY CHARGE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 12007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP649322.DOC;1/00006.900030/}- 8 - Packet Page 279 of 313 AM-846 S. Public Hearing on Ordinance Prohibiting Animals from Running at Large Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Suzanne Obrien, Police Department Submitted For: David Stern Time: 45 Minutes Department: Police Department Type: Action Review Public Safety Committee: Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Agenda Memo Subiect Title Public Hearing on proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds City Code Section 5.05.050 prohibiting animals from running at large, requiring humane treatment and notification of detained animals. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The Mayor and staff recommend that the Council adopt the provisions of ECC 5.05.050 as amended. Previous Council Action The issues of barking dogs and stray cats were brought to the attention of one or more Council members by members of the community and subsequently scheduled for discussion and review at the Public Safety Committee. These issues were thoroughly discussed at the meetings of October 10, 2006, November 14, 2006 and December 5, 2006 and recommended for full Council review. Narrative The issues of barking dogs and stray cats were reviewed in depth at the meetings of the Public Safety Committee on three separate occasions in October, November and December of 2006. Review included looking at enforcement options used by other jurisdictions locally and out of state, an analysis of the legal issues surrounding the trapping of cats in the form of a memo prepared by the office of the City Attorney and input from members of the community who held widely differing views. The Public Safety Committee members agreed with the recommendation of staff that sufficient options were currently available for enforcement of barking dog complaints. The members of the committee came to a consensus that the City Attorney should be asked to draft language amending ECC 5.05.050 pertaining to the humane treatment of animals being detained prior to release, that humane trapping devices be employed and that notification to Animal Control take place within 12 hours of an animal being detained. That draft language is contained in the amended code section before the full Council this evening. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Public Safety Minutes October 2006 Link: Public Safety Minutes November 2006 Link: Public Safety Minutes December 2006 Link: 10/10/06 Citv Attornev Memorandum Link: 02/15/07 City Attorney Memorandum Link: Proposed Ordinance Marked to Show Chanaes Link: Final Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 01:47 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 02:02 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Suzanne Obrien Started On: 02/15/2007 10:51 AM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 280 of 313 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting October 10, 2006 Committee Members Present: Council member Richard Marin, Chair Council member David Orvis Staff Present: Chief of Police David Stern Assistant Chief of Police Gerry Gannon Community Services Director Stephen Clifton Guests: Four Members of the Public The meeting was called to order at 1800 hours. A. Discussion of enforcement options related to barking dogs, stray cats, and possible changes to procedures. 1. Discussion regarding Enforcement Options for Barking Dogs Chief Stern advised that he had reviewed several ordinances included in the packet and did not find them to be any clearer than the existing language. Chief Stern stated that the common language in most ordinances described barking as disturbing a person or neighborhood to an unreasonable degree. The unreasonable degree standard is subjective and is probably one reason why the existing statute seeks three signatures from neighbors. The opinion of several neighbors would hold more weight in a prosecution than that of one person. Chief Stern was asked to consult with the departments personnel, who work the City of Mountlake Terrace, to determine if that City's ordinance is more effective. Chief Stern was than asked to report back at the November 14, 2006 Committee Meeting. 2. Discussion regarding Stray Cats Council member Chairman Marin preceded the discussion by stating that the topic would be confined to code language and not specific cases. Chief Stern gave a brief background of the existing code noting that it probably evolved from the necessity of circumstances. Specifically he noted that almost all cases involving bites and other aggressive behavior involved dogs as opposed to cats and that is most likely why the code is more heavily weighted toward dogs. Chief Stern then reviewed the memorandum from the City Attorney's Office discussing their research into the rights and responsibilities of pet and property owners. A synopsis of the memorandum follows with the entire memorandum attached for reference. Chief Stern noted the main topics as follows; • Cats, although not specifically prohibited from roaming at large, are not thereby granted any special rights or privileges. • Cats permitted to roam by their owners are liable for trespassing even if no damage is caused. • Reasonable force may be used to prevent or detain a trespasser. Packet Page 281 of 313 • Non -lethal traps or cages are considered reasonable force by many municipalities. • A trapped animal must be promptly removed from the property by; setting it free off the property; returning to the owner if known; or turned over to Animal Control Officers. • The trapped animal cannot be mishandled or neglected. Several options from other codes were noted which required release of stray animals to Animal Control authorities promptly and which authorized seizure and impound by property owners. It was observed that the code must be balanced to protect the rights of both property and animal owners and to provide for protection of seized animals. A citizen stated that the code must require owners of cats to prevent them from trespassing. Council member Chairman Marin indicated that the issue would be covered. No other citizen comments were noted. Chief Stern was directed to consult with the City Attorney and bring back suggested code language at the November 14, 2006 Committee Meeting. Action: On October 10, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. The discussion of "enforcement options relating to barking dogs, stray cats, and possible changes to procedures" was held. Chief Stern was asked to; consult with personnel who work Mountlake Terrace to determine if that City's ordinance is more effective and to consult with the City Attorney and bring back suggested code language at the November 14, 2006 Committee Meeting. Meeting adjourned at 1830 hours. Packet Page 282 of 313 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 2006 TO: Mayor Gary Haakenson; Councilmember Richard Marin; Police Chief David Stern; Asst. Chief Gerald Gannon City of Edmonds Public Safety Committee FROM: Bio F. Park, Office of the City Attorney RE: Legal Analysis of Trapping Cats Trespassing onto Private Property The Edmonds City Code on Animal Control, Chapter 5.05 ECC, does not prohibit domesticated cats from roaming at large.1 At large is defined as being unleashed and off the premises of its owner.2 Although such activity is not illegal under our code, no special right or privilege is created to cats or their owners. They must continue to obey applicable laws including those relating to animal waste and rights of private property owners.3 Cat owners allow their cats to roam the city unsupervised at their own risk. As noted in ECC 5.05.001, the responsibility and obligation to comply with requirements and regulations of animals falls upon their owners. Property owners, whether of real estate or an animal, have rights and responsibilities under Washington law. A cat owner who permits his or her cat to enter and or remain on private property without permission or invitation is liable for trespass even if no damage is caused.4 The right to exclude others is a fundamental attribute of real property ownerships State statute and the common law recognize a property owner's privilege to use reasonable force relative to perceived threat to prevent trespass.6 In addition, the same force may be used to reasonably detain a trespasser. Use of non -lethal cage or box traps is considered reasonable and appropriate by a number of municipalities given the degree of threat generally posed by cats. In fact, Animal Control in Lakewood will remove cats in non -lethal traps upon request by the property owner, and Animal Control in Everett will go one step further and lend -out such traps. After the trespassing cat is trapped, the property owner must take prompt steps to remove the cat from his property. The owner of the cat, if known, can be contacted to take the cat, or the cat can be freed outside property limits. While trapped, a cat is under that property owner's control and care, and animal cruelty laws do apply if the cat is mishandled or neglected .$ A prior city ordinance required property owners to turn over trapped animals to Animal Control within 24 hours. This approach offered protection to the animal and could prevent confrontations between affected owners. Again, the mere fact that the City does not prohibit cats from roaming at large does not equate to a creation of any special privilege. Roaming at large is a risky endeavor for any animal, including cats. Their owners should be aware such risks include being not only killed by traffic or wild animals, but also trapped by owners onto whose property they trespass. As long as done reasonably, property owners have the privilege under Washington law to prevent trespass. When cats trespass, their owners are civilly liable. BFP: ' See ECC 5.05.050; "It shall be unlawful for owners [... ] of any animal, with the exception of cats, to allow such animal to run at large [...] ." (Emphasis added.) 2 See ECC 5.05.010. 3 Unlike ECC 5.05.050, ECC 5.05.070 on animal waste makes no exception for cats. 4 See 16 Wash. Prac., Tort Law and Practice § 13.31 (2d ed.). 5 Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 602, 854 P.2d 1 (1993). 6 RCW 9A.16.020; Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 77, 78, 260 (1965). Id. 8 See Chapter 16.52 RCW; RCW 9.08.070; and ECC 5.05.128. Packet Page 283 of 313 Packet Page 284 of 313 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting November 14, 2006 Committee Members Present: Council member Richard Marin, Chair Council member David Orvis Staff Present: Assistant Chief of Police Al Compaan Assistant Chief of Police Gerry Gannon Fire Chief Tom J. Tomberg Assistant Chief Mark Correira Battalion Chief Doug Dahl Municipal Court Judge Douglas Fair Human Resources Manager Debi Humann Guests: Mayor Gary Haakenson Council President Deanna Dawson Roger Hertrich Ray Martin Sue Waldburger One Citizen The meeting was called to order at 1730 hours. E. Contracting for Court Security Officer. Councilmember Marin chose to take this item first on this evening's agenda. Judge Fair explained that outside contracting for court security is a FLSA issue. Puget Sound Executive Services (PSES) has been employed but they want to increase their hourly charge from $35.00 to $40.00. The city of Mountlake Terrace is willing to provide the service for $33.00 per hour. The Edmonds Police Officers Association can enter into negotiations with the city of Edmonds when their contract expires December 31, 2007, according to Judge Fair and that he would have no problem negotiating when the time comes. Ms. Humann said she understood that the EPOA felt it may be difficult for Edmonds officers to fill shifts. Councilmember Marin said he feels the best option is a one year interlocal agreement with Mountlake Terrace and then the EPOA could negotiate the matter. Councilmember Orvis said he feels court security is no different from regular police duties. Councilmember's Marin and Orvis agreed that they would like a one year interlocal with Mountlake Terrace at $33.00 per hour to be placed on Consent Agenda for council approval. Action: On November 14, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. Discussion was held on the issue of "Contracting for Court Security Officer." Councilmember's Marin and Orvis recommended a one year interlocal agreement be made between the City of Edmonds and the City of Mountlake Terrace at $33.00 per hour and this item be placed on the Consent Agenda for council approval. A. Enforcement options related to barking dogs. Councilmember Marin indicated he had several questions that ACOP Compaan had forwarded on to the city attorney and answers had not yet been received. Mr. Marin asked about whether the three citizens required to sign a petition could be any three citizens, not necessarily from the neighborhood. The other question had to do with better defining in ordinance the duration of the problem barking. Packet Page 285 of 313 Councilmember Orvis said he familiarized himself with Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace ordinances. ACOP Compaan stated that Edmonds has many of the same provisions and that in addition to the neighborhood petition there are also provisions in our ordinance relating to decibels and time of day as well as a provision allowing a police officer to issue a citation if the offending animal owner was warned and then did not quiet the barking dog. Councilmember's Marin and Orvis agreed that the matter would be brought back for review once more information was received from the city attorney regarding the questions raised. Action: Discussion was held on "Enforcement options related to barking dogs." Councilmember's Marin and Orvis agreed that this topic would be brought back to the Public Safety Committee for review once additional information was received from the city attorney relating to the questions raised. B. Enforcement options related to stray cats. Councilmember Marin said he had received correspondence from the city attorney regarding at - large animals and asked ACOP Compaan to provide a summary of the options as well as a recommendation. Both draft ordinances from the city attorney were the same, except that one version provided for an exception for cats from being a violation of the animal at -large ordinance. Both draft ordinances provided language to allow seizing and impounding of any at -large animal and a provision requiring notification of police or animal control authority within 24 hours of such seizure. ACOP Compaan said it was the Police Department's recommendation that there should be an exception for cats as a violation of the at -large ordinance and that there was no issue with a shorter notification requirement of 12 hours as suggested by Councilmember Marin. Councilmember Orvis asked whether there should be some requirement that a property owner notify police prior to setting a trap. He also said he would like to see language stating the person doing the trapping is responsible for care of the animal until such time as the animal is turned over to authorities. Mr. Martin (citizen) said he feels a property owner has a right to not have another person's animal on one's property. But he feels the animal owner has a right to be notified by the complainant or by authorities that there is a complaint prior to an animal being seized. Councilmember's Marin and Orvis agreed to have the stray cats issue brought back to Public Safety Committee for review once the city attorney has responded to the questions on the 12 hour notification requirement as well as the issue of animal care while in citizen impound. There was concurrence that cats should continue as an exception as a violation to the at -large provision. Action: Discussion was held on "Enforcement options related to stray cats." Councilmember's Marin and Orvis agreed that this issue was to be brought back to the Public Safety Committee for review after the city attorney has responded to the questions on the 12/hour notification requirement and the issue of animal care while in citizen impound. There was concurrence that cats should continue as an exception as a violation to the at -large provision. C. Implementation of City Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Policy Statement Objectives B., C., and D. Objective B. states Establish Fire Levels of Service and Staffing that Provide for Proactive Responses and Comply with State Statutes. Chief Tomberg described the plan for implementing Objective B. of the City Strategic Plan Public Policy Statement ll. consistent with Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo 684. The Chief pointed out that Council adoption of the Substitute House Bill 1756 Compliance Plan prior to December Packet Page 286 of 313 31, 2006 — on the Committee agenda for discussion later in the meeting — accomplishes Objective B. tasks and deliverables by the due dates. Action: After the subsequent SHB 1756 discussion, the Committee directed that SHB 1756 be placed on the regular Council agenda for November 28 with a recommendation to approve. Objective C. states Fire Levels of Service and Staffing Become Part of the Strategic Plan. Chief Tomberg described the plan for implementing Objective C. of the City Strategic Plan Public Policy Statement II. consistent with Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo 684. The Chief pointed out that Council adoption of the Substitute House Bill 1756 Compliance Plan prior to December 31, 2006 — on the Committee agenda for discussion later in the meeting — accomplishes the Objective C. task and deliverable by the due date. Action: After the subsequent SHB 1756 discussion, the Committee directed that SHB 1756 be placed on the regular Council agenda for November 28 with a recommendation to approve. Objective D. states Develop Public Safety Work Plans. Chief Tomberg began by pointing out that the 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan was not tied to approval of SHB 1756 as were the two earlier objectives despite the fact that all three objectives appear under the City Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Policy Statement. Chief Tomberg described the plan for implementing Objective D. of the City Strategic Plan Public Policy Statement II. consistent with Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo 684 to include methodology; work group members, advisory group members, and references; and the 26-item 2007-2008 work plan that will be the subject of special emphasis in the upcoming biennium. In response to a request from committee member Orvis, item 24. Add one staff person to the Fire Prevention Division to perform fire inspector and public educator duties. Address vehicle and space needs. was not included in the 2007-2008 budget requests due to the no new -hire budget instructions, and that Council approval of the work plan does not fund the position. Action: The Committee directed the 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan be placed on the Council consent agenda. D. Compliance with Substitute House Bill 1756 Chief Tomberg presented the plan for compliance with Substitute House Bill 1756 as directed by the committee at the September 12 meeting consistent with Committee Agenda Memo 687. The Chief explained that SHB 1756 requires the Fire Department to extract emergency response time data and evaluate levels of service (LOS), service deployment methods, and performance measures that apply to response time objectives for certain major emergency services, and provide an annual report based on the evaluation to the City Council and the public. The adopted standards for six emergency services and 11 measurable elements which the department should meet 90 percent of the time are: Turnout time for all emergency incidents (2:45). 2A. Response time for first -arriving engine company to fire suppression incidents (6:30). 2B. Response time for deployment of first alarm assignment to a residential fire Packet Page 287 of 313 suppression incident (7:45 with 15 personnel). 2C. Response time for deployment of first alarm assignment to a commercial fire suppression incident (9 minutes with 18 personnel). 3. Response time for first -arriving emergency medical services Basic Life Support (BLS) unit to an emergency medical incident (5:15). 4. Response time for first -arriving emergency medical services Advanced Life Support (ALS, Paramedic) unit to an emergency medical incident (6:45). 5A1. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level personnel on board to a hazardous materials incident (6:30). 5A2. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Technician level personnel on board to a hazardous materials incident (12 minutes). 5B1. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Technical Rescue Operations level personnel on board to a technical rescue incident (6:30). 5B2. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Technical Rescue Technician level personnel on board to a technical rescue incident (12 minutes). 6. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Marine Rescue and Firefighting personnel on board to a marine emergency incident (6:30). Two documents make up AM-687: a memo that provides an overview of 1756, and the attachment that contains compliance plan elements. The six -page overview memo addressed the law's background; why Edmonds is required to comply; the legislature's intent in passing the bill; methodology used to achieve compliance; a description of the measurable response time objectives; risk management issues; the compliance time line; the work group, advisory group and references; and additional benefits. "Additional benefits" refers to the fact that Council adoption of the Substitute House Bill 1756 Compliance Plan prior to December 31, 2006 accomplishes Objectives B. and C. of the City Strategic Plan Public Policy Statement ll. (see item C. minutes above and/or Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo 684). The 30-page compliance plan attachment describes the implementation matrix and compliance plan; lists the five required policy statements; identifies the six emergency services and 11 elements for which response standards are adopted; the format for comparing the adopted standards with 2006 response data; a discussion of the annual compliance report with examples of reporting "predictable results" and a "plan of action to correct deficiencies;" SHB 1756; excerpts from the 1756 implementation matrix; useful definitions and figures that explain "cascade of events," "flashover," "brain death," and the Golden Hour;" the adopting Council resolution; and three of the five required policy statements consisting of an organizational chart, the number of EFD employees, and the functions EFD employees are expected to perform. Packet Page 288 of 313 Committee members, Council President Dawson, and Fire Staff discussed the compliance plan noting the fact that the adopted response time standards, based on actual 2005 response time data, indicate that, in some cases, EFD emergency personnel will not arrive on the emergency scene in time to prevent the onset of "brain death" or prevent room "flashover" as described in the legislation. Fire Staff called attention to the public duty doctrine discussion in the Risk Management section of the overview memo, the associated public duty doctrine language in the adopting resolution (in the attachment), and this statement from Chapter 35.103 RCW which codified SHB 1756: the code "does not, and is not intended to, in any way modify or limit the authority of cities and towns to set levels of service." Committee chair Marin requested that the meeting minutes and the upcoming Council presentation on 1756 clearly reflect in plain language that in some cases the Department will not meet the "brain death" and room "flashover" response time criteria referenced in the law. Committee chair Marin asked that the minutes indicate that the committee was complimentary of the SHB 1756 report prepared by Fire Staff. Action: The Public Safety Committee directed the Substitute House Bill 1756 Compliance Plan be placed on the regular Council agenda for November 28 with a recommendation to approve. Meeting adjourned at 1847 hours. Packet Page 289 of 313 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting December 5, 2006 Committee Members Present: Council member Richard Marin, Chair Council member David Orvis Staff Present: Chief of Police David Stern Assistant Chief of Police Al Compaan Assistant Chief of Police Gerry Gannon Municipal Court Judge Douglas Fair Human Resources Manager Debi Humann Guests: Mayor Gary Haakenson EPOA President Steve Harbinson Four Members of the Public The meeting was called to order at 1800 hours. A. Approval of Interlocal Agreement with Mountlake Terrace for court security for 2007. Judge fair began with a brief description of General Rule 29 (GR 29) and its impact on his duties and authority. GR 29 is a rule passed by the Supreme Court that directs that the Presiding Judge is responsible for working conditions, hiring, discipline and termination of all court personnel. These responsibilities cannot be delegated to another branch of government. It was his opinion that this rule governed his decision on court security as long as court security was placed under his budget. It would be a violation of his duties under GR 29 to allow the Council to set any contractual limits on his authority to administer the Interlocal Agreement. The Council's authority is to provide or withhold budget approval, not to set the terms of the contract. He gave a brief background of the court security position to date. It was his opinion that Court security is not police work as contemplated by the union. Even if it was the unions had waived their rights to bargain the work under the CBA by accepting Puget Sound Executive Services to perform the work. He had requested an opinion by the City Attorney and felt that he was on solid legal ground for his decision to pursue an Interlocal Agreement with Mountlake Terrace. The decision was budget driven. In a perfect world, with unlimited resources, he would be happy to have the work performed by Edmonds Police Officers. That is not the case here with limited budgets. Mountlake Terrace can provide the most affordable, safe and effective court security. He respects the union's position and their president, Officer Harbinson. They have simply reached a point where they do not agree. Packet Page 290 of 313 Officer Harbinson did not disagree with the facts as set forth by Judge Fair. He also agreed that the negotiations have been cordial and there is no animosity between the parties. Officer Harbinson further stated that the union honestly cannot fill the position for the next year or even two. However, as the union president he cannot agree to a precedent that would allow Mountlake Terrace officers to come into Edmonds and serve police functions such as carrying weapons and arrest powers. He does not agree that the union agreed to waive any rights by not asserting their rights when the contract was made with PSES for court services. His primary concern was about setting a precedent that would allow the City to hire outside officers by using this agreement as an example. Councilmember Marin and Councilmember Orvis asked some questions to clarify their knowledge of the process and the parties' position. They asked both Judge Fair and Officer Harbinson if there was language that the Interlocal Agreement does not establish a past practice if that would be acceptable. Officer Harbinson indicated it might be but he would need to see the language. Judge Fair said it was possible but he needed to consult with the City Attorney. Both Councilmember's agreed that if both sides could agree to such language then it could be put on the Council agenda for discussion and approval. If they could not agree then it was to be placed back on the Public Safety Committee agenda, on a special basis, so the issue could be resolved before the end of the year. Action: On December 5, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. Discussion was held on the Interlocal Agreement with Mountlake Terrace for court security. Judge Fair will consult with the City Attorney regarding the Interlocal Agreement not establishing past practice. Officer Harbinson would then review the language. Councilmember's Marin and Orvis stated if Officer Harbinson and Judge Fair agree on the language then this item would be placed on the Council agenda for discussion and approval. If both parties do not agree then the issue would be brought before a special Public Safety Committee meeting so item can be resolved before the end of the year. B. Enforcement options related to barking dogs. Continued discussion was held relating to possible enforcement options. It was determined that sufficient options were currently available to deal with the issue. Councilmember Orvis will make contact with two complainants to review the options. Action: Discussion was held on "Enforcement options related to barking dogs." Sufficient options were currently available so Councilmember Orvis will make contact with two complainants to review the options. C. Enforcement options related to stray cats. Continued discussion was held relating to the enforcement options available for dealing with stray cats. Staff was directed to have the City Attorney draft language for the ordinance changing the notification time to twelve hours, adding language pertaining to the humane treatment of animals being held prior to release to Animal Control and language pertaining to the use of humane trapping devices. Draft language to be placed on the consent agenda for the full Council. Packet Page 291 of 313 Action: Discussion was held on "Enforcement options related to stray cats." Councilmember's Marin and Orvis directed the staff to have the City Attorney draft language for the ordinance changing notification time to twelve hours, adding language pertaining to the humane treatment of animals being held prior to release, and language pertaining to use of humane trapping devices. When completed, draft language to be placed on the consent agenda for full Council. D. Professional Services Contract with Jeannie Dines. Assistant Chief Compaan reviewed the "Professional Services Contract." Further discussion was held. A do pass recommendation was made by Councilmember's Marin and Orvis with further recommendation that the Professional Services Contract be placed on the Consent Agenda for December 12, 2006. Action: On December 5, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. A do pass recommendation was made that the "Professional Services Contract" be placed on the Consent Agenda for review and approval by City Council on December 12, 2006. E. Police Towing Contracts First Amendment. Assistant Chief Compaan reviewed the "Police Towing Contracts." Further discussion was held. A do pass recommendation was made by Councilmember's Marin and Orvis with further recommendations that the Police Towing Contracts be placed on the Consent Agenda for December 12, 2006. Action: On December 5, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. A do pass recommendation was made that the "Police Towing Contracts" be placed on the Consent Agenda for review and approval by the City Council on December 12, 2006. F. Contract for Deceased Animal Disposal Services with the S. Morris Company Assistant Chief Compaan reviewed the "Deceased Animal Disposal Services Contract." Further discussion was held. A do pass recommendation was made by Councilmember's Marin and Orvis with further recommendations that the contract with "S. Morris Company for Deceased Animal Disposal Services" be placed on the Consent Agenda December 12, 2006. Action: On December 5, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. A do pass recommendation was made that the "Deceased Animal Disposal Services contract with S. Morris Company" be placed on the Consent Agenda for review and approval by the City Council on December 12, 2006. Packet Page 292 of 313 G. Contract for Animal Kenneling Services with Adix's Bed and Bath for Dogs and Cats. Assistant Chief Compaan reviewed "Animal Kenneling Services with Adix's Bed and Bath for Dogs and Cats." Further discussion was held. Councilmember Marin felt the contract should be approved. Councilmember Orvis said he could not support the contract. The two councilmember's discussed the contract and decided the matter should be put on the Consent Agenda for December 12, 2006 with no recommendations for Public Safety Committee. Action: On December 5, 2006 the Public Safety Committee met. The "Animal Kenneling Services with Adix's Bed and Bath" was discussed at length. Councilmember's Marin and Orvis had no recommendations but asked that this item be placed on the Consent Agenda for review with a possible decision on the contract for December 12, 2006. Meeting adjourned at 1903 hours. Packet Page 293 of 313 DEN ff IRHY L CE P. L. L. C. A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW MEMORANDUM DATE: October 10, 2006 TO: Mayor Gary Haakenson; Councilmember Richard Marin; Police Chief David Stern; Asst. Chief Gerald Gannon City of Edmonds Public Safety Committee FROM: Bio F. Park, Office of the City Attorney RE: Legal Analysis of Trapping Cats Trespassing onto Private Property The Edmonds City Code on Animal Control, Chapter 5.05 ECC, does not prohibit domesticated cats from roaming at large.' At large is defined as being unleashed and off the premises of its owner.2 Although such activity is not illegal under our code, no special right or privilege is created to cats or their owners. They must continue to obey applicable laws including those relating to animal waste and rights of private property owners.3 Cat owners allow their cats to roam the city unsupervised at their own risk. As noted in ECC 5.05.001, the responsibility and obligation to comply with requirements and regulations of animals falls upon their owners. Property owners, whether of real estate or an animal, have rights and responsibilities under Washington law. A cat owner who permits his or her cat to enter and or remain on private property without permission or invitation is liable for trespass even if no damage is caused .4 The right to exclude others is a fundamental attribute of real property ownership.5 State statute and the common law recognize a property owner's privilege to use reasonable force relative to perceived threat to prevent trespass.b In addition, the same force may be used to reasonably detain a trespasser.7 ' See ECC 5.05.050; "It shall be unlawful for owners [...] of any animal, with the exception of cats, to allow such animal to run at large [...] ." (Emphasis added.) 2 See ECC 5.05.010. s Unlike ECC 5.05.050, ECC 5.05.070 on animal waste makes no exception for cats. 4 See 16 Wash. Prac., Tort Law and Practice § 13.31 (2d ed.). 5 Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 602, 854 P.2d 1 (1993). 6 RCW 9A.16.020; Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 77, 78, 260 (1965). Id. A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 • Seattle, WA 98101-1686 • 206.447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 • Web: www.omwlaw.com { FP643303.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Packet Page 294 of 313 Mayor Gary Haakenson Police Chief David Stern Asst. Chief Gerald Gannon October 10, 2006 Page 2 Use of non -lethal cage or box traps is considered reasonable and appropriate by a number of municipalities given the degree of threat generally posed by cats. In fact, Animal Control in Lakewood will remove cats in non -lethal traps upon request by the property owner, and Animal Control in Everett will go one step further and lend -out such traps. After the trespassing cat is trapped, the property owner must take prompt steps to remove the cat from his property. The owner of the cat, if known, can be contacted to take the cat, or the cat can be freed outside property limits. While trapped, a cat is under that property owner's control and care, and animal cruelty laws do apply if the cat is mishandled or neglected. s A prior city ordinance required property owners to turn over trapped animals to Animal Control within 24 hours. This approach offered protection to the animal and could prevent confrontations between affected owners. Again, the mere fact that the City does not prohibit cats from roaming at large does not equate to a creation of any special privilege. Roaming at large is a risky endeavor for any animal, including cats. Their owners should be aware such risks include being not only killed by traffic or wild animals, but also trapped by owners onto whose property they trespass. As long as done reasonably, property owners have the privilege under Washington law to prevent trespass. When cats trespass, their owners are civilly liable. IM 8 See Chapter 16.52 RCW; RCW 9.08.070; and ECC 5.05.128. {BFP643303.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 295 of 313 DEN ff IRHY L CE P. L. L. C. A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW MEMORANDUM DATE: February 15, 2007 TO: Mayor Gary Haakenson Edmonds City Council Police Chief David Stern City of Edmonds FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney RE: Proposed Animal Control Ordinance - Audience Comments As the members of the City Council Public Service Committee are aware, the Committee took public input, representing two very difficult positions regarding cats. One position sought to add cats to the prohibition against animals running at large. The other position sought to ban the use of humane traps by property owners. A citizen mentioned during audience comments the need to be "fair and unbalanced." The purpose of this memo is to address certain of the issues which came up under audience comments and to use that criteria, the balancing of public interest, to explain the staff s position. It is my legal opinion that the City Council has the legislative authority to impose a wide range of responses. This is a policy question for the Council to resolve. There is no legally dictated result. PROPERTY RIGHTS VERSUS ANIMAL CRUELTY Mr. Tupper alleged that the staffs position represents the favoring of property rights over concerns regarding animal cruelty. In reality, the staff s position balances two extreme competing positions taken before the Committee and attempts to balance two different property right interests and two different views of animal cruelty. From a legal perspective, the ownership of a pet is personal property. The protection of an individual's privacy and real estate is a real property interest. Therefore, from a purely legal perspective, one of the things that the Council will balance are these two separate property interests: the real property interest of homeowners and the personal property interest that an owner has in his or her pet. A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 • Seattle, WA 98101-1686 • 206.447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 • Web: www.omwlaw.com rSS650857.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 296 of 313 Mayor Gary Haakenson Edmonds City Council Police Chief David Stern February 15, 2007 Page 2 The citizens' positions also present two different views of animal cruelty. Mr. and Mrs. Martin presented their view from the perspective of the cat owner. As the committee heard, their neighbor asserts that allowing cats to roam unrestrained in your community results in cruelty to birds and other small wildlife. Cats are by their nature hunters. So whether the use of a humane trap is perceived as cruelty could depend whether you are a cat enthusiast or a Audubon Society member. SPRING -GUN ANALOGY Mr. Tupper also compared the staff proposal to the public policy prohibiting spring guns and other dangerous instrumentalities. As Mr. Park's prior memo to the City Council indicated, a property owner's right to exclude others from his property is based on this very principle -- only "reasonable" force can be used to exclude others. Therefore, there is no desire or proposal on the part of staff members to authorize the use of lethal force with regard to cats. There are state laws which prohibit the use of lethal traps and both state laws and animal ordinances against animal cruelty. See Chapter 16.52 RCW; RCW 9.08.070; and ECC 5.05.128. The additions to the current ordinance are intended to better treatment of detained pets by property owners. As the attached article notes, the approach taken by surrounding communities is very similar, with the only significant difference being whether the community makes humane traps available. PREEMPTION AND PASADO LAW Mrs. Martin asked how the City could enact an ordinance which conflicts with state law. City ordinances that attempt to authorize something prohibited or prohibit something specifically authorized by state law are preempted. In this case, the ordinance does not authorize the use of any trap -- but rather to impose restrictions and requirements of property owners who use humane traps as other legal methods.I RCW 9.08.070 RCW 9.08.070 makes it a crime to confine a pet animal with the intent to deprive the owner of said pet animal. It does not make it a crime to confine another's pet with the intent to prevent it from trespassing. The primary purpose of this statute is to prosecute theft of pet animals and criminals who kidnap them for ransom. Intentional, reckless and negligent animal cruelty cases are prosecuted under RCW 16.52.205 and .207 -- popularly known as the "Pasado Law." 1 State law does not prohibit property owners from trapping humanely animals that trespass onto private property. What it does prohibit is cruel to animals. Humanely trapping animals that trespass is not considered cruelty under state law. Similarly, RCW 16.04.010 permits property owners to detain and keep in their custody "rogue" live stock animals that trespass and cause property damage. { WSS650857.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 297 of 313 Mayor Gary Haakenson Edmonds City Council Police Chief David Stern February 15, 2007 Page 3 PASADO LAW The purpose of "Pasado Law," which amended Chapter 16.52 RCW in 1994, was to give the state's animal cruelty laws more "bite." It made it a felony to intentionally inflict substantial pain on animals causing physical injury, death or unnecessary pain. The keyword in the instant case, however, is "intentional." Under criminal law, a person acts with intent when he acts with the objective or purpose to accomplish a result that constitutes a crime. A property owner, who humanely traps nuisance animals to prevent trespass, does not act with the purpose of accomplishing a result that constitutes a crime. Common law recognizes a property owner's privilege to use reasonable force under the circumstances to prevent trespass. And state law does not prohibit property owners from trapping animals that trespass onto private property. Because the purpose of reasonably preventing trespass does not constitute a crime, the property owner does not act with the requisite intent to be prosecuted under "Pasado Law." The proposed ordinance amending ECC 5.05.050 to require humane treatment of detained nuisance animals is consistent with "Pasado Law" and Chapter 16.52 RCW in general. It emphasizes that only reasonable force may be applied in preventing trespass, and that measures must be taken to ensure the trapped animals are treated humanely and animal control notified. And when read objectively, it neither encourages nor discourages trapping of trespassing animals. STATE V. LONG The facts in State v. Long are in support of our previous position. In Long, the property owner shot and killed two hunting dogs that were trespassing onto his property, but posing no immediate danger to him or the property. The court found that use of deadly force was not reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Shooting and killing domestic animals to prevent a property trespass is an unreasonable use of force. We have previously advised that a property owner who detains an animal using a humane trap and notifies animal control, as the City's proposed ordinance would require, is using reasonable force under the civil law and not violating RCW 16.52.205 and 207. CAT'S INTENT Mr. Tupper argues that since a cat cannot form an intent to trespass, our prior advice is "absurd." A cat's knowledge of boundaries or its intent to trespass is irrelevant. A property owner's right to protect his property under Washington criminal law is consistently recognized, so long as the means used is reasonable. For example, a property owner has the right to repel surface water or { WSS650857.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 298 of 313 Mayor Gary Haakenson Edmonds City Council Police Chief David Stern February 15, 2007 Page 4 flooding without regard to damage the waters may do to his neighbors, so long, as the means used is reasonable.2 A property owner may trim the branches and roots of boundary trees that overhang his or her property even if the tree is damaged or killed.3 Neither flood waters nor tree limbs comprehend property lines, and, as with trespassing animals, a property owner has the right to use reasonable means to exclude water, trees and cats. USE OF CITY STAFF TO TRAP ANIMALS Mr. Tupper recommends that City staff be authorized to trap animals. The Police Chief indicates that he does not want to inject his personnel into what are essentially isolated disputes between property owners and has limited personnel and resources available. Why would it be less "immoral" for the City to trap on request than a property owner? BALANCING From the staff s perspective, the underlying issue is finding a proper public policy balance. This does not appear to be a widespread problem, whether from cats roaming at large or the use of humane traps to protect property. This decision is ultimately public policy for the City Council: is there a widespread problem which needs to be resolved through exercise of the police powers' regulations or is this a dispute between two neighbors? Our recommendation is based on our belief that is neither necessary to prohibit all cats from roaming at large, nor to prohibit the reasonable use of humane traps by property owners. Prohibiting cats from roaming at large places the City in the position of having to trap and control them. Prohibiting property owners from using humane traps or other methods to detain trespassing cats impairs a fundamental attribute of property ownership - the right to quiet enjoyment of your property. Anyone who has had two neighborhood cats engage in a territorial dispute at 2:00 AM under his or her window can appreciate why this is troublesome. If humane traps are banned, there is no practical, legal way for a property owner to deal with a problematic cat or other animal. The attached ordinance contains several revisions designed to emphasize that the ordinance does not authorize the use of unlawful or unreasonable methods to capture or detain an animal. This ultimately is a matter for the City Council to resolve as a policy issue. Hopefully, all of the points of view which were presented to the Council Committee will be presented during the public hearing. From the staffs perspective the current ordinances with the moderate adjustment suggested by staff correctly balances the competing interests of pet owners and property owners. WSS:gjz 2 Morris v. McNicol, 83 Wash. 2d 491 (1974) 3 Gostina v. Ryland, 116 Wash. 228 (1921) { WSS650857.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 299 of 313 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, domesticated animals running at large have been trespassing onto private property; and WHEREAS, said animals have been trapped by property owners onto whose properties they trespass; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds animals at large that are detained must be treated humanely; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.05.050 is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.05.050 Running at large prohibited. A. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person having charge, care, custody or control of any animal to allow said animal to run at large. B. A person who lawfully captures or detains j4n animal trespassing onto private property and or at large must do so without applying unreasonable force or inflicting more pain or harm to said animal than the situation reasonably requires. The person detaining the animal shall be responsible for the care and custody of the animal, and shall notify animal control authority of detention within 12 hours thereof. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to create a defense to any crime or civil infraction relating to animal cruelty, including, but not limited to, ECDC 5.05.128 or RCW 16.52.205, et seq. {BFP647860.D0C;2/00006.160189/} - I - 2/16/2007 Deleted: detaining a nuisance Inserted: Inserted: uisance Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 10 pt Packet Page 300 of 313 C. Subsection A shall not apply to the following animals: Domestic cats. 2. Animals owned by government agencies that are maintained for law enforcement purposes while under the custody and control of the trainer or keeper. D. Subsection B shall not apply to government agencies in charged of public safety, animals owned by said agencies that are maintained for law enforcement purposes while under the custody and control of the trainer or keeper, or to entities licensed by federal, state or local government agencies to detain nuisance animals. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect sixty (60) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. SCOTT SNYDER {BFP647860.DOC;2/00006.160189/} 2/16/2007, -2- APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 10 pt Packet Page 301 of 313 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {BFP647860.D0C;2/00006.160189/} 2/16/2007, -3- Formatted: Font: 10 pt Formatted: Font: 10 pt Packet Page 302 of 313 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2006, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2006. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP647860.D0C;2/00006.160189/}- 4 - 2/16/2007 Packet Page 303 of 313 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, domesticated animals running at large have been trespassing onto private property; and WHEREAS, said animals have been trapped by property owners onto whose properties they trespass; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds animals at large that are detained must be treated humanely; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.05.050 is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.05.050 Running at large prohibited. A. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person having charge, care, custody or control of any animal to allow said animal to run at large. B. A person who lawfully captures or detains an animal trespassing onto private property and or at large must do so without applying unreasonable force or inflicting more pain or harm to said animal than the situation reasonably requires. The person detaining the animal shall be responsible for the care and custody of the animal, and shall notify animal control authority of detention within 12 hours thereof. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to create a defense to any crime or civil infraction relating to animal cruelty, including, but not limited to, ECDC 5.05.128 or RCW 16.52.205, et seq. IBFP65255LDOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - 2/ 16/2007 Packet Page 304 of 313 C. Subsection A shall not apply to the following animals: 1. Domestic cats. 2. Animals owned by government agencies that are maintained for law enforcement purposes while under the custody and control of the trainer or keeper. D. Subsection B shall not apply to government agencies in charged of public safety, animals owned by said agencies that are maintained for law enforcement purposes while under the custody and control of the trainer or keeper, or to entities licensed by federal, state or local government agencies to detain nuisance animals. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect sixty (60) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. W. SCOTT SNYDER IBFP65255LDOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - 2/ 16/2007 Packet Page 305 of 313 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. IBFP65255LDOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - 2/ 16/2007 Packet Page 306 of 313 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2006, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2006. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE IBFP65255LDOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 - 2/ 16/2007 Packet Page 307 of 313 AM-852 7. Report on City Council Committee Meetings Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 02/20/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time: 15 Minutes Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Report on City Council Committee Meetings Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Minutes of the following committee meetings are attached: 1. Community/Development Services Committee - 2/13/07 2. Finance Committee - 2/13/07 3. Public Safety Committee - 2/13/07 Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: CSDS Minutes Link: Finance Minutes Link: Public Safety Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:08 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/15/2007 02:10 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/15/2007 02:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 02/15/2007 02:06 PM Final Approval Date: 02/15/2007 Packet Page 308 of 313 Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting February 13, 2006 Elected Officials Present: Peggy Olson, Council President Richard Marin, Committee Chair Staff Present: Duane Bowman, Dev. Services Director Dave Gebert, City Engineer Noel Miller, Public Works Director Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Brian McIntosh, Parks Director Jeannine Graf, Building Official Committee Chair Marin convened the meeting at 6:00 P.M. A. Presentation of 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Dave Gebert, City Engineer, introduced the topic. He noted that the proposed CIP includes 2007 in the plan but is really the CIP for 2008-2013. This was done to satisfy a request of the Administrative Services Director as the 2007 budget already addresses 2007 capital projects. Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer, reviewed the various funds. He noted that in fund 112 $150,000 fuel tax dollars are being transferred to Fund 111 and $150,000 will be transferred out of Fund 111 to the general fund. This has been budgeted for 2007/2008. The CIP aniticipates that this reduction in fuel tax revenues into fund 112 will not occur after 2008. We are now on a 30 year overlay cycle. If the fuel tax reducation holds over the long term, the ovelay cycle will shift to a 40 year cycle. Council member Marin asked about the heating units at Fire Station 16. Noel Miller responded that there have been problems with them and they are discussing them with the contractor. Don Fiene reviewed the hearing schedule for the CIP. The Planning Board has a work session on February 14, 2007 and then a public hearing on March 14, 2007. The City Council public hearing is scheduled for March 20, 2007. ACTION: CS/DS Committee endorsed the proposed CIP for presentation at a Public Hearing before the full Council. B. Discussion on draft Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 dealing with the permit development requirements of the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area of North Edmonds including proposed Landslide Hazard map. Duane Bowman, Development Services Director, introduced the topic and reviewed the history behind the project which started back in March of 2004. He noted that the City hired Landau & Associates to prepare a new map for the earth subsidence landslide area in north Edmonds which was based upon updated LIDAR topography. Jeannine Graf, Building Official, reviewed the draft ordinance and pointed out that the revisions which were driven primarily by citizen comments. She noted that not all citizen changes were incorporated but most were. The draft ordinance addresses time extensions on approved permit applications and review timelines. Further Landau prepared a Packet Page 309 of 313 CS/DS Committee Minutes February 13, 2007 Page 2 new updated hazard report for use by permit applicants. She noted that a public hearing will be held on March 20, 2007 at which the City's consultant will discuss the new map and ordiances. Council member Marin asked that the consultant address the question of degree of accuracy of the map. ACTION: Recommend the draft Ordinance and proposed map be forwarded to Council for a public hearing on March 20, 2007. C. Discussion on Shell Valley emergency access. Duane Bowman introduced this topic. He displayed an aerial photograph of the Shell Valley area that depicted the lot configurations and road network. He noted that there had been discussion about providing secondary access out of Shell Valley since the late 1970's. He reviewed the current access. He noted that the City owns the last parcel between Main Street and the north end of Pioneer Way. Because of emergency access issues raised during the last winter events, staff and the Mayor feel that the City should address this difficult access issue. The proposed plan would be to build a 20' width pedestrian/bicycle pathway which could double as an emergency access road during periods where the normal access to Shell Valley is blocked. The estimated cost for the project including engineering is $390,000. David Gebert, City Engineer, reviewed potential funding options including taking $50,000 out of the 2007 road stabilization set aside in Fund 112. He noted that if this project were added to the 2007-2013 CIP, design would take place in 2007 and construction in 2009 (funding dependent). Duane Bowman noted that we will attempt to engineer a preliminary short subdivision design for at least three lots. The money from the sale of the lots could be applied to the construction of the road. ACTION: The CS/DS recommends that the Shell Valley emergency access road be added to the 2007-2013 CIP and the 2007-2008 capital budget, with design in 2007 (using the $50,000 budgeted for ROW stabilization) and construction in 2009 with an option to construct it in 2008 if funding can be appropriated. D. Discussion on Historic Preservation Commission recommendation on Design Guidelines for downtown. Historic Preservation Commissioners Van Tassel, Waite and Deiner-Karr discussed with the committee the HPC progess on design guidelines for the downtown business district. Commissioner Waite noted that there will be a walking tour of the downtown business district on Saturday, February 17, 2007. The tour will point out characteristics of the downtown area and allow people to share common terminology. Rob chave noted that on February 27, 2007 there will be a joint meeting of the HPC and the City Council and the design guidelines will be a topic of discussion. ACTION: No action taken. The Committee meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Packet Page 310 of 313 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES February 13, 2007 6:00 PM Present: Councilmember Ron Wambolt Councilmember Dave Orvis Staff: Kathleen Junglov Deb Sharp Dan Clements Committee Chair Orvis called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Item A: Fourth Quarter Budget Report Kathleen reviewed the fourth quarter budget report with the Committee. There were several questions relating to expenditures in the Economic Development Department, sales tax revenue, and natural gas utility taxes. It was also reported that the General Fund ended the year approximately $700,000 ahead of budget estimates. Item B: 2007 LTDGO Bond Sale The Committee was briefed on the calendar for the up -coming LTDGO bond issue. It was noted that the Moody's rating conference call will be held Friday morning, February 16, and that the actual bond sale will be Tuesday, February 27. Item C: EMS Cost Center There was a discussion of ways in which the City could increase the transparency of revenues and costs associated with emergency medical services (EMS). Committee members expressed a desire to see some type of cost center presentation that would present both revenues and costs. Staff will contact Fire and work on a new financial presentation. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 PM. V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\2007 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES\FINANCE - 070213.DOC Packet Page 311 of 313 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting February 13, 2007 Committee Members Present: Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Chair Councilmember Michael Plunkett Staff Present: Chief of Police David Stern Assistant Chief of Police Al Compaan Guests: None The meeting was called to order at 1800 hours. A. Discussion regarding graffiti in the city and enacting an anti -graffiti ordinance. Chief Stern presented an overview of the issue indicating that there was evidence of two distinct types of graffiti in our community. Those being the so called art form placed by taggers and a small amount of gang related material. At the present time existing enforcement is conducted under the malicious mischief provisions of code and is adequate for the purpose. Chief Stern noted that removal of graffiti is done in part by the city and in part by property owners depending on who owns the property in question. Edmonds Community Development Code, section 20.110.030, specifies that graffiti is a nuisance on private property and must be removed by the owner; however, it does not specify a time frame. A discussion was held on several options, including adding code to make it a crime to possess, purchase or furnish implements used to produce graffiti and formalizing abatement procedures. It was agreed that a time factor needed to be added to the existing code. The committee agreed that Chair Person Dawson would look further into the legislative aspect and consult the City Attorney. The matter will then be brought back to the Public Safety Committee on March 13, 2007. Action: On February 13, 2007 the Public Safety Committee met. Discussion was held regarding enacting an anti -graffiti ordinance. It was agreed by the committee that Chair Person Dawson would look into the legislative aspect and consult the City Attorney and that a time factor needed to be added to the existing code. This item to be brought back to Public Safety Committee on March 13, 2007. B. Review of 2007 Addendum to Prisoner Detention Agreement with the City of Lynnwood. Assistant Chief Compaan discussed the 2007 addendum to the Prisoner Detention Agreement with the City of Lynnwood. This is an annual addendum that covers the costs of the Whatcom County Cooperative Prisoner Transport, which provides a daily prisoner transport service that runs between Bellingham and Seattle. This service transports prisoners between the various jails along the I-5 corridor. The proportionate cost to the City of Edmonds for 2007 is $13,067.67 and that is already budgeted in the current Police General Fund budget. Packet Page 312 of 313 Councilmembers Dawson and Plunkett agreed that this item should be placed on consent agenda with a "do pass" recommendation. Action: On February 13, 2007 the Public Safety Committee met. The committee reviewed the "2007 Addendum to Prisoner Detention Agreement with the City of Lynnwood." Councilmembers Dawson and Plunkett recommended a "do pass" with the item to be placed on the consent agenda for February 20, 2007. Meeting adjourned at 1932 hours. Packet Page 313 of 313