Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007.03.20 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA Edmonds City Council Meeting Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds March 20, 2007 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Call to Order and Flag Salute 1.Approval of Agenda 2.Consent Agenda Items A.Roll Call B.Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 6, 2007. C.Approval of claim checks #94672 through #94851 for March 8, 2007 in the amount of $476,953.46. Approval of claim checks #94852 through #95003 for March 15, 2007 in the amount of $257,341.46. D.Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Frank Tsering Degotsang (amount undetermined), Roseann Wilson (amount undetermined), Mark and Sherri Johnson ($929.94), Richard and Kathleen Glassburn (amount undetermined), and Marilyn G. Walker ($87.04). E.Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington State Liquor Control Board, January - March 2007. F.Report on final construction costs for the Meter A Rehabilitation Project and Council acceptance of project. G.Report on final construction costs for the 2006 Citywide Storm Improvements project and Council acceptance of project. H.Surplus of computer monitors and donation to Interconnection. I.Authorization for Public Works to Purchase one (1) new 2007 Chevrolet 2500 4x4 Suburban for the Fire Department in the amount of $34,616.21 including Washington State sales tax. 3. (15 Min) Historical Report on Term Limits 4. (10 Min) Public Hearing regarding a Sign Code amendment to clarify language addressing community event banner sites on City-owned property. 5. (45 Min) Public Hearing on the 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program. 6. (45 Min) Public Hearing on the proposed amendments to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 dealing with development permit requirements for the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area of North Edmonds. The proposal includes an updated Landslide Hazard Area Map. 7.(5 Min) Ratify Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Snohomish County, City of Edmonds, and Edmonds School District #15 regarding Termination of Previously Executed Interlocal Agreement, and Ratify Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Snohomish County and the City of Edmonds for Assistance in the Acquisition of All or Part of the Old Woodway Elementary Site. 8.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 9.Report on City Council Committee Meetings. AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 1 of 433 9. (15 Min) Report on City Council Committee Meetings. 10.(5 Min)Mayor's Comments 11.(15 Min)Council Comments 12.Adjourn AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 2 of 433 AM-890 2.B. Approve Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 6, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative A copy of the draft March 6, 2007 City Council Minutes is attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 03-06-07 Draft Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 10:14 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 10:24 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 07:09 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 03/15/2007 09:58 AM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 3 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES March 6, 2007 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT David Stern, Chief of Police Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dave Gebert, City Engineer Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Haakenson requested the addition of a 30 minute Executive Session regarding pending litigation as Item 8A, advising that the Council would adjourn at the conclusion of the Executive Session. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2007. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #94507 THROUGH #94671 FOR MARCH 1, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $225,518.00. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #44567 THROUGH #44616 FOR THE PERIOD OF FEBRUARY 16 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $784,837.01. D. COUNCIL CONFIRMATION OF 2007 MEMBERS OF THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE. E. AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE 164TH STREET SW WALKWAY AND THE 74TH PLACE WEST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS. F. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES MURPHY AUCTIONEERS TO SELL SURPLUS CITY VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT. Packet Page 4 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 2 G. PURCHASE (1) ONE NEW CATCH BASIN CLEANER TRUCK USING WASHINGTON STATE PURCHASING CONTRACT #07005 FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS STORM WATER DIVISION. H. CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL KENNELING SERVICES WITH ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND CATS. I. ORDINANCE NO. 3630 AMENDING EDMONDS CITY CODE 8.51.030, COMMUTE EXEMPTION FROM THREE-HOUR PARKING LIMITS, RELATING TO THE DISPLAY OF THE EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT. Mayor Haakenson introduced several scouts from Troop 312 who were attending the Council meeting working on their citizenship badge. 3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF PORT OF EDMONDS DAY, MARCH 7, 2007. Councilmember Wambolt, Council representative to the Port of Edmonds, read a Proclamation declaring March 7 as Port of Edmonds Day in honor of the Port’s 2006 Marina of the Year Award. He presented the Proclamation to Commission President Marianne Burkhart, Commissioner Mary Lou Block and Executive Director Chris Keuss. Ms. Burkhart commented ten years ago the Port had been on the cover of Marina Dockage magazine because the marina had been destroyed by snow. A decade later, they would again be the cover story for being the best marina in the entire country. She noted they had been selected from over 12,000 marinas in the country; this honor was due to the very competent and customer-oriented staff led by Executive Director Chris Keuss. Councilmember Moore congratulated the Port Commissioners, noting that type of leadership came from the top. 4. PROJECT UPDATE AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 6 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PERTEET, INC. FOR DESIGN OF 220TH STREET SW IMPROVEMENTS (9TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 84TH AVENUE WEST) PROJECT. City Engineer Dave Gebert advised construction of the 220th Street SW project was substantially completed and the road reopened in July 2006. Since July, the contractor completed landscaping, modular rock walls, fencing, property restorations and miscellaneous details. Construction included reconstruction and widening of the road from 84th to 9th, grading to improve visibility and safety, sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides, left turn pockets at selected intersections, new traffic signals at 84th Avenue West and 9th Avenue West, lighted pedestrian crossing at 96th Avenue West. Permanent radar speed signs, landscaping behind the sidewalk at selected locations, and associated relocation and installation of utilities. Construction funding included $3.26 million in State and Federal grants, $400,000 in low-interest Public Works Trust Fund loans, and approximately $700,000 in reimbursement from funding partners including the Olympic View Water and Sewer District, Edmonds School District, and the City of Edmonds water, sewer and storm utilities. Other partners who participated through in-kind contributions included Snohomish County PUD, Puget Sound Energy, Verizon, Comcast and the U.S. Post Office. The construction contract for this project was a unit price contract. The contract was bid and awarded based upon estimated quantities for over 140 bid items, and the total final contract amount was based Packet Page 5 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 3 upon actual final quantities of work installed at the bid unit prices. Although final project closeout actions remain to be completed, it is possible to estimate a final total project construction cost, including construction administration and engineering, right of way acquisition, public art, and miscellaneous other minor costs. As is typical in construction contracts like the 220th Street SW improvements project, Mr. Gebert explained actual quantities have varied from estimated quantities, and construction change orders have increased the cost as construction progressed. Some of the revenues into the project budget have also increased. He referred to Attachment 1, explaining the total project construction budget, including grants, loans, reimbursable amounts and other funding sources, authorized by Council in June 2005 was $5,075,650. This budget included construction contract, contingency, construction administration and engineering, public art, right of way acquisition and miscellaneous other minor costs. On November 21, 2006, the Council approved the 2006 Final Budget Amendment, including an increase in 2006 capital project expenditures in Fund 112 for this project, which increased the overall project construction budget for the 220th Street SW Improvements project to $5,689,510. Included in the revised budget were increased revenues from reimbursable partners in the project (Olympic View Water & Sewer District and Edmonds School District) to pay for change orders for requested scope increases for their elements of the project. Increased revenues include $277,011 in Traffic Impact Fees and $5,442 in sidewalk “in-lieu” payments from private development projects not included in the construction budget authorized by Council in June 2005, for a total increased revenue of $282,453. Also shown in Attachment 1, the estimated final total project construction cost is approximately $5,405,000, including construction, construction administration and engineering, right of way acquisition, public art, and miscellaneous other minor costs. Mr. Gebert reviewed the following significant items that caused the overall project construction cost to increase over the original construction budget authorized by Council in June 2005: a. Scope increase requested by reimbursable project partners. Olympic View Water and Sewer District requested a change order for the addition of a Pressure Reducing Valve Vault at the cost of $30,198, and the Edmonds School District requested paving and other playground improvements at Westgate Elementary School at a cost of $67,724. The City has been reimbursed for these costs. b. A change order was required at a cost of $29,913 to provide a left turn pocket on 9th Ave S. for vehicles turning left onto 220th Street SW. The City has been reimbursed for this cost by the design engineering consultant. c. A change order was required for additional storm drainage improvements at a cost of $41,641 to address drainage issues on abutting private properties caused by changes in the grade of 220th Street SW and which could not be identified during the design. d. The quantity of modular block walls required was underestimated by 1,902 square feet. This resulted in a cost increase of $34,227 from the bid amount of $163,260 to an actual total of $197,487. There were a number of locations where the design did not anticipate modular block walls would be required, but they were determined to be needed when grading was completed and the new road and sidewalk were constructed. e. The contract included time-and-materials bid items for property restoration, erosion control, and unforeseen site conditions with an estimated amount of $75,000 provided in the bid documents. This amount proved to be underestimated and actual cost ($169,540) exceeded the estimated amount by $94,540. Examples of work in this item included regrading of private property to Packet Page 6 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 4 blend into new street and driveways, special driveway treatments to match existing, fence restorations, resolving underground utility conflicts, and removal of obstructions and debris not shown on plans. f. The most significant single item of cost increase ($330,695) was in traffic control. Traffic control is paid on a unit price per hour, as required by WSDOT on projects with Federal grant funds. The estimated number of traffic control hours for the contract bid amount was based upon totally closing the road to all but residents, as was our original plan. However, this proved to be impractical due to the number of drivers who continually disregarded traffic barricades, which necessitated implementation of increased and continuous traffic control to ensure safety of workers and the public. In addition, the project duration was extended by delays in Verizon relocating their lines and other excusable delays, which also necessitated increased traffic control hours. This cost increase is partly reimbursed by the project funding partners on a prorated basis. g. In January 2006, the City’s Traffic Engineer, who had been the project manager for this project for the prior 4 1/2 years, resigned to take a position with the project’s design engineering consultant. To maintain continuity on this major project, it was determined to be in the best interest of the City to increase the consultant’s scope of services for the remainder of the project. This resulted in an unanticipated additional project management cost of approximately $140,000. This cost increase was also partly reimbursed by the project funding partners on a prorated basis. Mr. Gebert explained the project was designed by Perteet, Inc. In March 2005, Council approved Supplemental Agreement No. 3 for Perteet to provide construction administration and construction engineering support services. Subsequently, the Council approved two Supplemental Agreements. A significant portion of the additional construction administration and construction engineering support services was to increase the scope of services provided by Perteet for the remainder of the project to include the majority of the duties previously performed by the City Traffic Engineer. Mr. Gebert explained the scope of services and budget for the original contract and supplemental agreements executed to date were based on an average of 20 hours per week being spent on City project administration through August 2006, and a total of an additional 60 hours through December 2006 for project closeout. The actual amount required has been significantly more to ensure completion of all construction requirements, negotiate final quantities with the contractor, complete project documentation for the WSDOT audit, and other project closeout requirements. It is now anticipated that the remaining project closeout actions will require continued support from Perteet through approximately June 2007. Supplemental Agreement No 6 is to compensate Perteet for additional costs over that anticipated in the previous supplemental agreements as well as the estimated additional effort required through project closeout. Sufficient funds are available in the approved project budget to award this supplemental agreement. Mr. Gebert requested Council authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 6. Councilmember Moore commented because the work had been done the Council had little choice. Mr. Gebert explained the Council already approved the budget increase in November, this request was for approval of the Supplemental Agreement. Councilmember Dawson did not recall the Council being advised that the Traffic Engineer had been hired as a consultant on this project. She expressed concern with an employee leaving the City and then the City paying more for their services via a consulting firm. She requested this be a future Council discussion item. Mr. Gebert recalled it was presented to and approved by the Council. He explained City Attorney Scott Snyder and he discussed the situation as he shared her concerns. After evaluation, they were comfortable it was legal. Once it was determined to be legal, from a practical standpoint, there was little choice due to Traffic Engineer Darrell Smith’s extensive involvement in the project, making it Packet Page 7 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 5 impractical at that stage to have someone else manage the project. Councilmember Dawson referred to the additional $140,000 that would be paid to Perteet Engineering, expressing concern with a firm the City contracted with hiring one of the city’s employees and then charging more. She acknowledged it was legal but did not seem quite right. Mr. Gebert commented this illustrated the value of in-house staff. Councilmember Wambolt shared Councilmember Dawson’s frustration, noting it was common in private industry. Mr. Snyder commented it was legal because there were no State Statutes that prohibited civil servants from contracting with another agency for a period of time after leaving the City’s employ. He noted the Council could consider such a provision. Councilmember Moore requested this topic be placed on a future agenda. Council President Olson asked whether not utilizing Mr. Smith as a consultant would have slowed the project and increased costs. Mr. Gebert remarked he would hate to think how the project would have been managed without Mr. Smith due to his 4½ years of background and knowledge of the project. He noted it would not have been realistic for the new Traffic Engineer to take over the project management. He concluded although it was more expensive, it was the right thing to do. Councilmember Plunkett acknowledged Mr. Smith’s assistance at community meetings and his institutional knowledge of the project; however, he would like to have this concept reviewed. As four Councilmembers questioned the concept, he requested it was added to the retreat agenda. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 6. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO UPDATE THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH NEW DESIGN GUIDELINES AND A NEW "UP-FRONT" DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS APPLICABLE TO SPECIFIC DISTRICTS (INITIALLY LIMITED TO DOWNTOWN AND HIGHWAY 99). Planning Manager Rob Chave provided a history of this issue, explaining in 1993 the court case Anderson v. Issaquah highlighted the need for predicable design standards and a process to be followed. As the City’s ordinance was similar to the ordinance addressed in that case, some revision to the City’s ordinance was felt to be necessary. In 1999 the City Council commissioned a study by Cedar River Associates who addressed the general design guidelines and design process. Their conclusions emphasized the need for design guidelines that were specific enough that developers knew what was expected and for the design review to occur at the beginning. In 2000 the City hired Cascade Design to develop design guidelines. The Planning Board completed an extensive review process as well as public hearings and forwarded a recommendation with specific guidelines to the City Council. In 2002-2003, the Council reviewed the design guidelines, concluding the proposed design guidelines were too specific and referred the design guidelines to committee. The committee removed a portion related to signs and that portion was adopted in 2003. In 2004-2005, the City embarked on an extensive update of the Comprehensive Plan. During that process, design objectives were adopted. At the conclusion of the Comprehensive Plan process in 2005, the Council also had a series of discussions with urban design expert Mark Hinshaw that focused on downtown. Mr. Hinshaw provided several ideas for enhancing the City’s guidelines specific to downtown. Following additional meetings with the Council, Planning Board and Architectural Design Board (ADB) in 2006, the ADB agreed an upfront design review process was appropriate. The Council Packet Page 8 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 6 agreed and forwarded the process to the Planning Board. The Planning Board has completed its review and forwarded a recommendation to the Council for this new process. Mr. Chave displayed a diagram of the current design review process in which design review occurs late in the process. The problem with the existing process was by the time design review at the ADB occurs, the applicant has a detailed design on which they have expended a great deal of time, money and effort, making it difficult for the ADB to convince them to modify their design to any significant degree. He displayed a diagram of the proposed new design review process where design review occurs at the beginning. The new process would use a two-phased public hearing for major projects. At Phase 1 of the public hearing, the ADB reviews a checklist with the applicant to determine what aspects of the design criteria checklist needed to be addressed by the design of the project. Public input would also occur at this time. The next meeting with the ADB to review the project concept for compliance with the ADB guidelines is considered to be a continuation of the public hearing or “Phase 2” of the public hearing. Any appeal would also occur at this stage. At the completion of Phase 2, the applicant using the conceptual design proceeds with detailed design work to obtain a building permit. Staff then reviews the plans against the design review conditions established by the ADB as well as the City’s codes. He anticipated this would streamline the process as the design parameters would be established upfront. The Planning Board recommendation contains the current process as the default. The same design review applies; however, the new process would be applied to districts or sections of the City as specific design code requirements, standards, etc. were adopted such as had been done for Hwy. 99 and downtown. He summarized this new process would apply initially to those two areas. He noted the new process also incorporates the new landscaping standards taken from the 2001 draft design guidelines. Mr. Chave reviewed a comparison of the current process and the proposed new process: Current process New Process General design review (Section 20.11) District Based (Section. 20.12) ADB and public input at the end of the process ADB and public input at the beginning of the process Guidance from criteria in 20.11.030, tweak recommended by the Planning Board to address long, monotonous walls paragraph Guidance from the ADB design guidelines and the checklist Zoning bulk standards Zoning bulk standards and applicable adopted district-based design standards Comprehensive Plan design objectives Applicable Comprehensive Plan design objective Mr. Chave summarized the existing process was retained as the default; the new process would be applied in areas where specific design standards had been developed. He pointed out the Historic Preservation Commission was in the process of developing standards that could be applied to one or more areas of the downtown, focusing on the retail core. As those were a separate process and it was uncertain when they would be complete, he recommended not delaying the establishment of the upfront process until they were completed. Those standards would supplement the existing downtown design standards. He noted ACE had also submitted some suggested design recommendations related to downtown. He suggested they be combined with the standards being developed by the Historic Preservation Commission. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether ADB review occurred at the beginning and the end of the new process. Mr. Chave referred to the diagram of the new process, identifying the ADB review at the beginning of the process where they would address the general parameters of design, making decisions Packet Page 9 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 7 regarding what criteria were important and how they should be applied in the project. He noted the ADB’s input would occur early in the design before building plans were developed. Currently much of the detail was developed before the ADB review. For Councilmember Plunkett, City Attorney Scott Snyder advised at the second phase of the public hearing the ADB would establish specific design criteria and approve the checklist. He clarified the biggest risk in the ADB review was subjective/ad hoc decisions to deny or grant projects based on someone’s feeling about an applicant or the way a building looked. The decision must be based on specific design criteria. The problem with the existing process was the public often did not have an opportunity to comment until the design was “cast in stone” and their objections are often with aesthetic elements upon which specific design guidance is not provided. The intent was to allow public input to influence the design process before the building was designed. Staff approval at the end of the process was similar to a building review process; specific conditions were developed, generalized design criteria were specified and staff would have a list of 30-40 elements as well as code requirements with which to review the proposed design. The intent was to eliminate the implication/reality that decisions were made based on subjective or generalized feelings rather than criteria. Councilmember Plunkett observed the preliminary ADB hearing was for discussion and the second was the formal ADB hearing. Mr. Chave explained Phase 1 was to discuss the criteria and look generally at the site and identify what was important to address such as adjacent buildings, slopes, etc. and developing the checklist. Based on that discussion, the applicant would refine their ideas and return to the ADB at Phase 2 with one or more concepts and obtain a decision regarding the general design of the project. Any appeal would also occur at this point. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether Phase 2 was quasi judicial. Mr. Snyder answered the entire process was quasi judicial with appeal to the City Council. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether there was a firewall between the phases. Mr. Snyder explained the ADB holds a two-part hearing that is entirely quasi judicial. They would not hear an appeal of the decision as they were involved in the decision. There was still opportunity for a LUPA appeal at the end of the process to Superior Court. Councilmember Orvis asked whether the standard for commercial transparency that currently existed had been removed. Mr. Chave answered there were no standards in the code, there were only guidelines that were vague and not well defined. Guidelines provide flexibility; as long as the applicant met the intent, it was approvable. Mr. Snyder commented as design standards for the neighborhood districts were developed, there was the potential for neighborhoods to establish criteria that must be met. He used the example of where entrances were located; although of great importance on Hwy. 99 and downtown, it may be less important in a neighborhood business area. Mr. Chave recalled there was a requirement for window transparency in the BD1 zone. Councilmember Orvis asked how that could be expanded to the Arts Corridor. Mr. Chave answered that would need to be addressed via a separate process, either by amending the BD zones or possibly via incorporating it into the standards being developed by the Historic Preservation Commission. Councilmember Marin commented the upfront design review process was not a new model; it was being used successfully by other cities. Mr. Chave agreed it was used by Seattle and the Cedar River study identified several cities utilizing the upfront process. Councilmember Moore supported developing standards by neighborhood/district as it allowed neighborhoods more control. With regard to the appeal to the Council, as the project at that point would not have detailed drawings, she asked what the Council would be reviewing. Mr. Chave answered the Council would be provided building massing, site plan, elevations, etc. but not be to the degree of detail Packet Page 10 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 8 necessary for a building permit, they would be more conceptual. He acknowledged there was a balance – enough to know what a project looked like without requiring so much time and effort that the design was locked in. The intent was to consider major issues that people cared about such as the location of the building on the site, rooflines, entries, etc. Councilmember Moore asked if a LUPA appeal would be filed at that point. Mr. Snyder advised once the conditions were established by the ADB, the appeal would be to the Council. The preamble described how the process worked. He pointed out each property and its surroundings were unique; the design review process provided an opportunity to develop the checklist and prioritize the guidelines with regard to the building and its surroundings. The detailed design of the building would be left to the developer, thus the importance of developing specific conditions that could be applied in the second phase. Councilmember Wambolt commented the criteria still seemed very subjective; for example the criteria to address long, massive unbroken, monotonous buildings was multiple rooflines or forms, architectural detailed entries, appropriate landscaping, and windows with architectural fenestration. He asked whether the applicant could be provided input at Phase 1 regarding how to address a long, unbroken or monotonous building. Mr. Chave pointed out the statement regarding long, massive, unbroken or monotonous in Section 20.11 was in the existing process; that wording did not appear in the new upfront process. Mr. Snyder explained the applicant would present information regarding the neighborhood, lot, etc. and a general description of their design and the ADB, based on the guidelines developed by the neighborhood, would specify techniques in the conditions and the applicant would return with a more specific design for staff review. Mr. Snyder commented Anderson v. Issaquah was in regard to unconstitutional vagueness. An ordinance could be unconstitutional on its face or as applied. The City has created guidelines to provide techniques for a developer to use to address the generalized criteria. Even with that protection, an ordinance could be unconstitutionally vague as applied if the hearing body ignored detail in the guidelines and for example identified a building as monotonous without considering whether the guidelines were applied. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented under the existing process, an early review was available although it was optional. He noted a developer who had built in the City for a long time may not need the early review versus a developer new to the City who may need the early review. Because the new process had more meetings and the ADB only met once a month, he anticipated the process would be slower that the existing process for a developer who was familiar with the City. He inquired whether the public had an opportunity to provide input at the Phase 1 hearing. Similar to the optional review in the existing process, he suggested holding an informal meeting with the applicant, a couple of ADB members and a member of the Historic Preservation Commission that was advertised to the public. He used the renovation of Old Milltown as an example and the question regarding the square footage of new building that determined whether SEPA was required. He asked what opportunity the public had for input once the detailed plans were submitted. He objected to staff making more decisions in the proposed process, opining that staff needed to be supervised by the public. He preferred the quasi judicial portion of the hearing remain where it was in the existing process to allow the public to analyze project details. Tony Shapiro, Edmonds, commented on the inability for government to flow with the natural sequence of the design process. He anticipated the sequence as proposed would make it very challenging to keep the natural momentum of a project under design. He stated a conceptual design to a developer may be simplistic bubble diagrams, not elevations. He found it counterproductive to have a long review sequence at the beginning of process, anticipating the end result would be mediocre architecture. He anticipated elevations would not be provided at the initial hearing. He suggested an applicant be allowed to submit Packet Page 11 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 9 materials, meet with the ADB the following week, the ADB provide their input and the applicant incorporate the design guidelines and ADB recommendations and return with more detailed drawings at a hearing that would be advertised to the public. He was concerned with the amount of time this design review process would consume. Bob Gregg, Edmonds, expressed support for the proposed process. He referred to the letter he submitted from Dennis Reynolds, the attorney who tried the Anderson v. Issaquah case who they invited to assist them in reviewing the proposed process. He highlighted several suggested changes including eliminating the statement “long, massive, unbroken or monotonous” from Section 20.11 and addressing a conflict in wording on pages 9 and 12 – page 9 states “to comply with the input of the public and ADB” and page 12 states “adequately address the input of the ADB,” stating his preference for the latter wording. On page 7 of the design guidelines, he pointed out the box and convex awning should be allowed and awnings should be allowed above or below the transom depending on the grade. On page 11 he recommended changing the sentence, “Design Review should not result in any significant reduction in actual bulk and scale.” He advised the materials he submitted contained additional revisions. He summarized the two step process that invited input early in the process and using that to create the final design would serve the public well by allowing them to have input before a developer had designed a building in detail. He urged the Council to adopt the proposed new process. Don Kreiman, Edmonds, commented as a community activist, he was proud of his neighborhood; however, his neighborhood was deteriorating including an unoccupied and obsolete strip mall. He supported the proposed process because it allowed him to be part of the process at the beginning. Using a custom designed product as an example, he explained only after the specifications had been agreed to was the product designed. The proposed process would involve the architect, staff and the public at the beginning and if the public was part of the process of creating the design guidelines and reviewing proposals, they would be happy to tell developers what aspects they felt were most important. He suggested increasing the notification to more than just property owners with a 300 foot radius. Scott Schlumberger, Edmonds, agreed with the design review process upfront although he had concerns with the process as outlined. He recommended SEPA occur earlier in the process. He suggested the design guidelines provided flexibility and streamlining, noting design departures were an important part of design guidelines. He questioned the time to prepare the staff report between Phases 1 and 2, anticipating four months could elapse between the phases. He suggested consideration be given to a method to accomplish the steps more quickly such as staff making a threshold determination at the counter. He concluded longer lead times led to higher costs which affected the ability to provide affordable housing as well as developers’ interest in building in Edmonds. Councilmember Moore inquired about a threshold determination. Mr. Schlumberger suggested a threshold determination could be made at the counter, noting it currently took months. He pointed out a completeness letter was required to be provided in 29 days; they submitted an application on December 7 and received a completeness letter last week. He viewed the design guidelines as a new attitude of collaboration between the building community and planning/permitting department. Rob Michel, Edmonds, suggested staff work with the development community who would be using the proposed process to ensure it worked for them and for the public. He pointed out the diagram of the proposed process did not match the text in the code and there were no timelines associated with each step. He noted there was the potential for a long time between Phase 1 and 2 as the applicant was required to submit their response to input provided at the first meeting and then staff prepared a report to the applicant and ADB. He suggested that report also be provided to the public. He suggested very tight timelines be established. He pointed out a SEPA appeal would require another hearing as could an appeal to the City Council, a total of four hearings in the proposed process. He recommended staff prepare Packet Page 12 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 10 examples of what they expected developers to provide at each hearing, noting conceptual drawings meant different things to different people. He referred to the arduous requirement to provide a site plan that includes every significant building within a 200-foot radius, suggesting an aerial photo would be sufficient due to the difficulty in determining what was considered a significant building. He preferred the public have opportunity to review final drawings because final drawings may be different than conceptual drawings. He noted the text in the code also did not state what the developer did after the Phase 2 hearing. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, commented when the ADB was originally formed in the late 70s, it was an aesthetics board whose goal was high quality development in Edmonds. He expressed concern with the proposed process, pointing out the detailed plans were never presented to the public. He referred to a recent contract rezone for a single family lot in the BC zone that included specific requirements, commenting none of the specific conditions of the contract rezone were met in the final development. He acknowledged the public’s ability to file a LUPA appeal, yet once the hole was dug and the building extended 15 feet into the single family zone, the public had no recourse. He acknowledged this may be an issue for the State Legislature. He provided another example of a contract rezone for a PRD that reduced lot sizes from 12,000 square feet to 8,000 square feet. Although the materials repeatedly stated 24 houses would be built, 4 additional houses were allowed. He expressed concern about the public not seeing the details. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing. In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comment regarding the optional preliminary review, Mr. Chave explained it was extremely rare for a developer to request a preliminary review. That preliminary review tends to occur with major projects that have the most architects and engineers involved because they realized it was to their advantage to get as much input as possible before beginning their design. Staff tends not to get requests for preliminary review for projects done by smaller developers who may feel they cannot afford the time for that review. With regard to the comment about SEPA thresholds, Mr. Chave explained the SEPA determination must be made before the ADB’s decision so that the developer and public knew early on whether SEPA applied. If a project were to be reviewed by the ADB based on false information that SEPA did not apply, the applicant would risk starting over when he learned SEPA was required. With regard to Mr. Shapiro’s comments regarding design sequence and flow, Mr. Chave explained the intent was for the design review to occur very early in the process at the conceptual stage. Although the proposed process required the developer to get involved with the City much earlier than they had before, the intent was to fit into the design process versus having it back loaded. With regard to comments about elevations, Mr. Chave referred to packet page 13 which contained a short list of what an applicant needed to do for Phase 1. Although an elevation was mentioned as one of the items, it only needed to depict the volume of the proposed structure in relation to the surrounding buildings and improvements – it was not a detailed elevation. He compared this to the language on the next page, the elevations for Phase 2 portion of the hearing which required elevations for all building faces illustrating building massing and openings, materials and colors, and roof forms. The more detailed elevations were provided in the second phase. With regard to Mr. Gregg’s suggestions, Mr. Chave commented they could be reviewed along with the language to be developed by the City Attorney. With regard to Mr. Kreiman’s suggestion to increase the 300-foot notice, Mr. Chave pointed out in addition to the 300-foot notice, notice was published in the newspaper as well as posted in several locations. Residents could also inform others in their neighborhood who were beyond the 300-foot radius. Extending the notice requirement would have a significant impact on the City’s budget as the City bore the cost of mailings. Packet Page 13 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 11 Mr. Chave agreed with Mr. Schlumberger’s comment about providing more flexibility via the ADB design guidelines. He agreed the SEPA determination needed to be done early but disagreed it could be done at the counter as there were mailing requirements based on the determination, etc. With regard to Mr. Schlumberger’s suggestion about design departures, Mr. Chave recalled the Cedar River study suggested the City consider design departures which had been successfully used in Seattle. He noted design departures could work with an upfront design guidelines process but would be more problematic with standards. He suggested after the City had some experience with this process, consideration be given to design departures. With regard to Mr. Michel’s comments about the diagram versus the text, he explained the intent was to have the two be consistent. He agreed with Mr. Michel’s suggestion to mail the report to the public, noting although the code did not currently require it, that was staff’s practice. With regard to Mr. Michel’s concern with it being an open-ended process, Mr. Chave explained Regulatory Reform dictated a 120 day timeline within which the City was required to reach a decision. The biggest determinant of the amount of time between the Phase 1 and Phase 2 hearing was how long the applicant took to develop a design for ADB consideration. In response to Mr. Tupper’s comment on the need for detail, Mr. Chave remarked on the conundrum of how much detail to require versus how much influence the ADB and public could have on the design before the details were developed. The only way detail worked was with the ADB at the end of the process such as in the current process which was counter to the intent of the proposed new process. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Haakenson referred to the comment that the ADB met only once a month but had previously met twice a month and the suggestion that a smaller group of ADB members conduct the first review. Mr. Chave stated historically the ADB met twice a month and that could be considered again. The risk with a subcommittee of the ADB was there were different perspectives and different fields of expertise among ADB members. He offered to inquire about the ADB’s availability for two meetings a month. Mr. Snyder agreed with providing written notice of final plans to the public. He urged caution regarding expectations, explaining the reason the upfront design process was proposed was to allow developers to get specific direction before developing final designs. Therefore the conceptual drawings may differ from the final design if all the specific conditions of approval are met. He clarified it was not design by committee or the public designing a building, it was about the developer meeting specific conditions established from existing guidelines and codes with the input of the public and ADB. It was also not whether someone liked or did not like a building; marketability was the developer’s right/risk. With regard to Mr. Tupper’s comment about how design review was conducted in the 70s and 80s, that process was no longer available. Councilmember Marin commented there did not seem to be much debate about the design guidelines themselves, the concerns were with the upfront process. If the Council approved the Planning Board’s recommendation and directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance, it could be scheduled as a discussion item on the Council agenda in two weeks. He suggested in the meantime, if there were funds available, hiring a consultant to update the Cedar River study particularly what cities were successfully utilizing the upfront process. He suggested staff could then contact those cities with regard to specifics on how the process was working. He was also concerned with the amount of time that would elapse between the first meeting and the second meeting. He asked if these efforts could be accomplished in the next two weeks. Mr. Chave answered not by hiring a consultant due to the time that required; staff could attempt Packet Page 14 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 12 to contact some of the cities. He pointed out another city’s process would not exactly mirror the proposed process. Councilmember Marin wanted assurance the proposed process would not extend into four months and that the two-step process could occur fairly quickly. Mr. Chave reiterated it would depend primarily on the applicant. He pointed out the current ADB process was also governed by the 120 day requirement. He acknowledged the design review would be earlier but did not anticipate the new process would take more time than the current process and actually should be shorter. Councilmember Marin commented although he liked the proposed process, he wanted assurance regarding how it worked in other cities. Mr. Chave agreed staff could do some investigation. Councilmember Plunkett asked how design departures would be integrated. Mr. Chave suggested gaining some experience with the process as proposed to determine whether it provided enough flexibility and revisit it after a year. He commented design departures were not easy to craft as parameters were required with regard to when they were appropriate, on which aspect of the design would they be allowed, etc. Councilmember Plunkett referred to Mr. Chave’s comment that the issues outlined in Mr. Gregg’s email could be addressed by Mr. Snyder, observing most appeared to be policy issues. Mr. Chave advised he did not have Mr. Gregg’s written comments; his response was to Mr. Gregg’s verbal comments. He offered to have staff address in writing at the time an ordinance was presented the other issues Mr. Gregg raised. With regard to box awnings, he recalled discussions with Mark Hinshaw related to downtown commercial that indicated the ends of box awnings obstructed the view of hanging signs. Councilmember Plunkett asked staff to comment on the 4-page letter from Davis Wright Tremaine. Mr. Snyder answered much of it was chapter and verse of what had been said before. There were some comments regarding the ACE comments that may require Council consideration. He clarified the adopted design guidelines were intended to be a way of explicating the generalized code requirements. David Wright Tremaine was suggesting they be specifically referenced. With regard to design departures, Mr. Snyder explained there were two kinds of design departures – variances and incentives. The intent was very specific design guidelines and requirements; if a design departure was not to do something that was required, that would constitute a variance. If the departure was to substitute something for another requirement or an incentive, the best place to develop those was via the neighborhood process. Councilmember Dawson agreed with Councilmember Marin’s suggestion with regard to additional information regarding the timeline. She asked if staff believed the proposed process would take the same amount of time as the existing process. Mr. Chave answered the proposed process should be quicker, due in part to the checklist the ADB developed. Another thing that would speed up the process was it dealt with conceptual issues rather than specific drawings. Councilmember Dawson anticipated concern by developers with a project that would sail through the old process but now must contend with the new process. Mr. Chave stated the maximum time under the existing process and new process was 120 days. Councilmember Dawson was concerned with the two-phase process taking longer and suggested establishing a reasonable amount of time for staff’s review. Mr. Chave offered to provide a more detailed diagram comparing the existing process versus the new process. Councilmember Dawson referred to the comment about what materials they would provide at each phase, suggesting staff develop examples. Councilmember Dawson asked if providing the final report to all parties of record was required by the code. Mr. Chave answered that was staff’s current practice but it was not required. Councilmember Dawson commented it would be appropriate to include it in the code. Mr. Snyder suggested notice be in Packet Page 15 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 13 the form of an offer to view the plans at City Hall as copying drawings for a large project may be quite burdensome. Councilmember Dawson agreed, asking whether there was an opportunity for the public to provide comment. Mr. Chave advised the public could always make comments; he was hesitant to codify that to avoid the impression it was a formal comment period. Councilmember Dawson asked whether there was the ability to have a formal comment period. Mr. Snyder cautioned against anything that looked like multiple hearings on the same project. Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained typically a building permit application went through multiple reviews – an initial review, review of comments and final review. He suggested if information was to be provided to the public, applicants could be required to submit electronic drawings of the building exterior elevations at the time of building permit that could be viewed online. He advised the public could also view the plans at City Hall; however, they may not always be readily available as they were being reviewed by staff. He cautioned against another de facto public hearing. Councilmember Wambolt echoed the concern that the public would not see the detailed design at the public hearing. This was a concern to citizens because under the existing process, the public hearing was held after the detailed design was created, yet many buildings when constructed did not look like the plans. The public wanted to know that what they saw was really what was built. Mr. Chave responded the most practical solution was the additional notice when final plans were available. He commented if the Council increased the notice requirement, staff would return with a request to increase the fee. Mr. Snyder commented the electronic drawings should include a link to the ADB’s decision so that the public could identify which of the ADB’s conditions were not met. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Moore expressed interest in considering design departures in 6-12 months. Mr. Chave suggested 12 months. Councilmember Moore agreed with the suggestion to research other cities’ experience with the upfront process. Councilmember Marin stated the proposed recommended action was to approve the Planning Board recommendation and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for Council adoption. He was interested in moving the process forward, acknowledging there were some questions remaining. He asked if the Council could provisionally approve the Planning Board recommendation and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for further Council discussion and adoption. Mr. Snyder advised allowing two weeks for him to prepare the ordinance would also allow staff the time needed to respond to Council questions/requests. The ordinance could then be scheduled on the agenda for further discussion. Councilmember Plunkett suggested keeping the public hearing open to allow the public another opportunity to comment once the additional information was provided. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO PROVISIONALLY APPROVE THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE FOR FURTHER COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ADOPTION AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Councilmember Moore asked whether members of the public who spoke during the public hearing could be invited to provide further comment. Mr. Snyder advised the public hearing had been closed. The public hearing could be reopened or a new public hearing scheduled. Councilmember Dawson suggested scheduling another public hearing which would allow the public to comment on the information that would be provided by staff. She expressed her support for the motion inasmuch as it required staff provide further information. Packet Page 16 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 14 Council President Olson suggested scheduling the ordinance on the April 3 agenda as the March 20 agenda was already full and the animal control ordinance was scheduled on the March 27 agenda. Councilmember Moore requested Mr. Snyder also address the inconsistency in the wording. Councilmember Plunkett expressed concern with the provisional approval as he was uncertain whether he would ultimately support the ordinance. His intent was to move it forward for further discussion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Don Kreiman, Edmonds, Chair of the Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee, explained the mission of the Committee was to educate their neighbors about transportation issues. He invited the public to take the bus to the Sound Transit open house at the Lynnwood Convention Center on March 15 from 4:30 – 7:30 p.m. As he began to describe Sound Transit’s proposal, Mr. Snyder advised the Council adopted a procedure that prevented comment on a ballot measure. Mr. Kreiman advised buses to the open house would leave the Edmonds library at 3:56 (accompanied by Councilmember Marin, who also serves as Sound Transit and Community Transit Boardmember) and 4:26 p.m. (accompanied by Hank Moravec, Citizen Transportation Committee Member) Parking was available at the City’s municipal lot, the library, or near City Hall. The bus fare is $1.25 for adults and $0.50 for seniors and riders must have exact change. For further information, he invited the public to contact Mr. Moravec at 425-771-2751. Ray Martin, Edmonds, commented overlapping responsibilities between departments resulted in poor organization and poor results. He explained animals were addressed in Chapter 17 - Code Enforcement as well as in Chapter 5 - Public Safety. He recommended combining the responsibility in one department, preferably a separate animal department under the Police Chief. He described a complaint he filed with code enforcement regarding 25 quail being raised in a residential neighborhood. The Code Enforcement Officer referred his complaint to Police Chief Stern who referred it to the Animal Control Officer. His most recent request was answered by Chief Stern stating there was no violation of Chapter 5.05 as quail were not poultry or domestic animals and the correct definition would seem to be wild animals, technically upland game birds. The limit of five animals referred to domestic animals but his complaint would be referred to Code Enforcement as they enforced Chapter 17. Chief Stern advised should there be a violation of Chapter 5.05 staff would take appropriate action. Mr. Martin responded if quail were wild birds, then Chapter 5.05.131, which prevented a person from owning a wild animal, had been violated and he requested the City take appropriate action. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Supplemental Agreement No. 6 with regard to the 220th Street SW improvements project, suggesting the Council review the numbers again. He found the numbers astounding as well as the practice of paying an employee who left the City’s employ more via a consultant contract. The overruns on the project were due to the Traffic Engineer as well as inflation due to the delay in Verizon moving their poles. He suggested many of the cost increases could have been anticipated, particularly with the delay. He also questioned the amount of City engineering time that had been expended on this project in addition to the outside engineering. He summarized the significant increases warranted further discussion as well as criticism regarding how the contract was handled. 7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson reported Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh, Councilmember Dawson and he accepted a check from Snohomish County Executive Aaron Reardon today for $1.2 million for the park in South Edmonds. Packet Page 17 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 15 Mayor Haakenson invited the public to his neighborhood meeting at Meadowdale Elementary School Library on Thursday, March 8. 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Moore pointed out Councilmember Marin was in a photograph in the Seattle Times today regarding a Sound Transit ribbon cutting. Councilmember Moore recalled she was shocked when the Council was asked to approve the cost overruns on the 200th Street SW project. She remarked there appeared to be shockingly bad estimates. She noted the cost overruns were due to administration’s lack of management on the project. However, the budget had been approved and the lesson learned was assuming someone was irreplaceable. Councilmember Moore urged Mayor Haakenson and Mr. McIntosh to get the citizens in south Edmonds involved in providing input early in the process of developing the park. She noted this park was very important to the citizens in that area and they likely had done a great deal of visioning and would like to be involved in the planning at the beginning. Councilmember Moore noted Council Comments was the only forum for the Council to present new ideas. She suggested consideration be given to term limits for the Mayor. Her discussions with previous Councilmembers and historians indicated term limits had been in place in the past but have been removed. She suggested consideration be given to term limits for the following reasons: Mayor Haakenson has said there is no one who can run the City except him which she found humorous as well as dangerous. She noted the Traffic Engineer was an example of what happened when only one person could do a job. If there was only one person qualified to be Mayor, she recommended developing leadership by getting more people on the Council and Boards/Commissions. She noted term limits leveled the playing field as most Mayors were former City Councilmembers. In the case of most cities in Washington, four of the seven Councilmembers could not run for Mayor without giving up their Council seats as they were on the same cycle as the Mayor. The playing field was leveled if there was not an incumbent. She relayed the advice of City Attorney Scott Snyder that term limits were illegal. She cited information provided by Municipal Research via a 2001 memo that term limits were legal, referenced term limits in other Washington cities, and an Attorney General ruling. She requested some research be done on the issue of term limits for the Mayor. Councilmember Moore also suggested citizens consider a City Manager form of government, noting she was not certain she was in favor of this. She noted most younger cities had a City Manager form of government. She explained with a City Manager form of government, there was a better chance of a hiring a professional administrator versus an elected Mayor who may lack management skills and a City Manager was answerable to a board who could terminate his/her employment. Under a City Manager form of government, the Council would elect a Mayor from the Councilmembers. She noted Mountlake Terrace had a City Manager form of government that appeared to work well. She recognized a change in the City’s form of government would require a public vote. Councilmember Moore invited any citizen who wanted a change made to the minutes to contact a Councilmember rather than staff. Councilmember Marin complimented the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee on the initiative to invite the public to take the bus to the Sound Transit open house on March 15 at the Lynnwood Convention Center. He noted he may be on the second bus. Councilmember Marin reported he attended the dedication of the new light rail operations and maintenance facility on Monday west of the former Rainier Brewery. He explained the 8-foot R on the Packet Page 18 of 433 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 6, 2007 Page 16 old brewery had been refurbished and a neon company built the letters AIL and the letters RAIL were mounted on the side of the maintenance and operations building. He noted one of the advantages of being the last large regional area without light rail was the ability to take advantage of lessons learned in systems built over the last 30 years. He noted the maintenance and operation facility was miles ahead of any facility built in the last 30 years. Councilmember Wambolt agreed with Councilmember Moore’s suggestion regarding term limits for the Mayor, finding 8 years to be adequate for anyone to serve. He acknowledged there may not be anyone willing to challenge the current Mayor but if he did not run, there likely would be other candidates. He did not know enough about the City Manager form of government but the rationale described by Councilmember Moore sounded logical, having a professional person run the City. He agreed this may be something the citizens wanted to consider. 8A. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 9:51 p.m., Mayor Haakenson recessed the Council to a 30 minute Executive Session regarding pending litigation. 9. ADJOURN The Council meeting was adjourned at the conclusion of the Executive Session (10:10 p.m.) Packet Page 19 of 433 AM-891 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Approval of claim checks #94672 through #94851 for March 8, 2007 in the amount of $476,953.46. Approval of claim checks #94852 through #95003 for March 15, 2007 in the amount of $257,341.46. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: Revenue: Expenditure: $ 734,294.92 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $ 734,294.92 Attachments Link: Claim cks 3-8-07 Link: Claim cks 3-15-07 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 03/15/2007 10:21 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 11:46 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 06:01 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 07:09 AM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 03/15/2007 10:09 AM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 20 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94672 3/5/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS February 2007 FEBRUARY 2007 DRS February 2007 DRS 811.000.000.231.540.000.00 168,109.34 Total :168,109.34 94673 3/8/2007 062614 ABPA A7292 NATIONAL DUES - L MC MURPHY~ NATIONAL DUES - L MC MURPHY~ 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 50.00 CHAPTER SRC4 - LOCAL DUES 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 20.00 Total :70.00 94674 3/8/2007 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 0307241 BASKETBALL T-SHIRTS BASKETBALL T-SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 187.74 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 16.71 VOLLEYBALL T-SHIRTS0307242 VOLLEYBALL T-SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 312.84 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 27.84 Total :545.13 94675 3/8/2007 069876 ACCIS 2007 Membership WATERS & DANNINGER 2007 Organization Membership Dues 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 75.00 Total :75.00 94676 3/8/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070228 INV#1201641-20070228 EDMONDS PD SEARCHES/REPORTS 02/07 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 54.25 Total :54.25 94677 3/8/2007 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 07-48 JANITORIAL SERVICE 1Page: Packet Page 21 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94677 3/8/2007 (Continued)071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES JANITORIAL SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00 Total :334.00 94678 3/8/2007 001057 ALMY, DON ALMY0313 VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SUPERVISION VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SUPERVISION~ 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 864.00 Total :864.00 94679 3/8/2007 069829 AMIDO, BENJAMIM AMIDO7980 UKULELE CLASSES UKULELE #7980 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 392.00 Total :392.00 94680 3/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3828093 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 35.46 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.16 Total :38.62 94681 3/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3823126 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.18 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.58 18386001512-3828095 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.18 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.58 Total :185.52 94682 3/8/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3826478 FLEET UNIFORM SVC 2Page: Packet Page 22 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94682 3/8/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 PW MATS512-3826479 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70 3Page: Packet Page 23 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94682 3/8/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC512-3826480 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-3828094 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 Total :101.47 94683 3/8/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 555437 75179 DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,063.20 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 165.06 Total :2,228.26 94684 3/8/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-1124 PARKS MAINT. BLDG PARKS MAINT. BLDG 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 25.73 CEMETERY425-771-4741 CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 25.73 Total :51.46 94685 3/8/2007 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 06-3012 & 06-3014 BURIAL SUPPLIES 4Page: Packet Page 24 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94685 3/8/2007 (Continued)001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO BURIAL SUPPLIES: GIDNER 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 BURIAL SUPPLIES: THORNTON 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 Total :716.00 94686 3/8/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9465975 Canon 5870 copier lease 4/1 - 4/30/07 Canon 5870 copier lease 4/1 - 4/30/07 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35 Canon 5870 copier lease 4/1 - 4/30/07 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32 Canon 5870 copier lease 4/1 - 4/30/07 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33 Canon 5870 copier supply charge 4/1 - 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01 Canon 5870 copier supply charge 4/1 - 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00 Canon 5870 copier supply charge 4/1 - 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.25 Total :412.75 94687 3/8/2007 068032 BLANCH, ANN BLANCH7619 TAIJIQUAN CLASSES TAIJIQUAN #7619 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 144.00 Total :144.00 94688 3/8/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 539679 INV#539679 EDMONDS PD - COMMENDATION BAR 5Page: Packet Page 25 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94688 3/8/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC COMMENDATION BAR 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 11.40 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.00 Total :12.40 94689 3/8/2007 071527 BRAND, KURT 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94690 3/8/2007 067947 BROWNELLS INC 04280715.00 INV#04280715.00 ACCT#00557761 EDMONDS PD 3/32 FIGURE STAMP SET 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 19.12 1/16 SINGLE LETTER STAMP "I" 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 2.22 Freight 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 9.25 Total :30.59 94691 3/8/2007 071510 BUCK, ALICIA BUCK7645 KIDZART KIDZART SQUIGGLES TO GRINS~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 202.80 Total :202.80 94692 3/8/2007 071528 BURROWS, DALE 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94693 3/8/2007 071529 BURY, KAREN 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94694 3/8/2007 071530 BUTLER, JULIE 20907 JURY FEE 6Page: Packet Page 26 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94694 3/8/2007 (Continued)071530 BUTLER, JULIE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94695 3/8/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 104048 SUPPLIES OXYGEN, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.73 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.65 Total :32.38 94696 3/8/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY100835 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 26.79 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.38 ALS SUPPLIESLY104017 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 19.23 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.91 ALS SUPPLIESLY104018 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 28.84 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.76 ALS SUPPLIESRN02071014 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 15.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 1.38 7Page: Packet Page 27 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :127.79946963/8/2007 003510 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 94697 3/8/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT7701 CHILDREN'S CLASSES MARCH MORNING OUT #7701 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 44.80 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #7656 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 130.20 Total :175.00 94698 3/8/2007 071305 CHIEF 496728 INV#496728 CUST#235024 EDMONDS PD NIK "Q" TEST KITS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 68.97 NIK "K" TEST KITS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 17.99 Total :86.96 94699 3/8/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460573200 OPS UNIFORMS Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 101.09 Stn 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 101.09 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.99 OPS UNIFORMS460573223 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 Total :355.17 94700 3/8/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD FALK 80/HOUR BASIC POLICE MC COURSE/FALK-EDM FALK/REGISTRATION~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 150.00 Total :150.00 8Page: Packet Page 28 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94701 3/8/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1755554 005302 TISSUE/PAPER TOWELS/TP 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 218.03 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 19.19 Total :237.22 94702 3/8/2007 068077 CODES KNOWLEDGE COMPANY 446 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR POINT EDWARDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR POINT EDWARDS 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,838.00 BLD20061240/CALIAS APT. BLDG.-PROF.447 BLD20061240/CALIAS APT. BLDG.-PROF. 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 902.00 Total :2,740.00 94703 3/8/2007 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC R0 006741 UNIT 233 - BODY REPAIR & SUPPLIES UNIT 233 - BODY REPAIR & SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 977.90 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 87.03 UNIT 720 - BODY REPAIR& SUPPLIESRO 006614 UNIT 720 - BODY REPAIR& SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 3,194.03 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 284.27 Total :4,543.23 94704 3/8/2007 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 020729897715374044 INV#020729897715374044 EDMONDS PD 15 - 5 GALLON WATER BOTTLES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 112.35 HOT/COLD COOLER RENTAL 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.91 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.89 9Page: Packet Page 29 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :125.15947043/8/2007 066368 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 94705 3/8/2007 071552 CUBBAGE, NANCY CUBBAGE7932 MOSAIC MIRROR CLASS STAINED GLASS MOSAIC MIRROR CLASS #7932 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 146.25 Total :146.25 94706 3/8/2007 071267 DENNIS R CRAIG CONST INC E5AC.Final Pmt E5AC.Final Progress Payment E5AC.Final Progress Payment 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 29,779.79 Total :29,779.79 94707 3/8/2007 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2007020133 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 Scan Services for February, 2007 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 311.45 ACROBAT 8.0 PROFESSIONAL WINDOWS UE~I135634 Acrobat 8.0 Professional Windows UE~330-00330 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 171.11 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 12.41 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 1.28 Total :496.25 94708 3/8/2007 063064 DEZURIK WATER CONTROLS RPI/53000961 843968 C-161 SCREENING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,052.00 Total :1,052.00 94709 3/8/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2728 MINUTE TAKING 2/27/07 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 221.20 Total :221.20 94710 3/8/2007 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL Feb 2007 LOBBYING SERVICES FOR FEBRUARY 2007 Lobbying for February 2007 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,135.00 10Page: Packet Page 30 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :4,135.00947103/8/2007 068591 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 94711 3/8/2007 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2007169 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - BLDG DEPT. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - BLDG DEPT. 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 5,098.65 Total :5,098.65 94712 3/8/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 76998 SUPPLIES UNDERCOAT, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 40.72 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.62 Total :44.34 94713 3/8/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 9711 UPS/AM TEST UPS/AM TEST 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 8.47 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.75 Total :9.22 94714 3/8/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 150876 INV#150876 CLIENT#308 EDMONDS PD - ROCKY SYNOVI G3 SOFT CHEWS 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 70.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 6.23 Total :76.23 94715 3/8/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 7-05275 EDMONDS CEMETERY EDMONDS CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 109.97 Total :109.97 94716 3/8/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 023038 ADMIN REPAIR/MAINT 11Page: Packet Page 31 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94716 3/8/2007 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES copier maint 001.000.510.522.100.480.00 88.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.480.00 7.92 Total :96.89 94717 3/8/2007 068405 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SERV 9726 INV#9726 EDMONDS PD CASE OF MILLENIUM ENERGY BARS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 112.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.89 Total :120.89 94718 3/8/2007 066004 ESRI 91498351 ARCGIS MAINTENANCE - PLANNING DEPT. ARCGIS MAINTENANCE - PLANNING DEPT. 001.000.620.558.600.480.00 7,900.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.480.00 663.60 Total :8,563.60 94719 3/8/2007 009880 FEDEX 8-706-75372 Community Services Dept. mailing Community Services Dept. mailing 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 36.41 PW Correspondenc - G. Gradias8-707-48157 PW Correspondenc - G. Gradias 001.000.651.519.920.410.00 32.87 Community Services Dept. mailing 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 43.26 Total :112.54 94720 3/8/2007 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 22807 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 9,510.00 Total :9,510.00 94721 3/8/2007 066590 FELIX LLC, ROBERT W FELIX7492 STOP SMOKING CLASS 12Page: Packet Page 32 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94721 3/8/2007 (Continued)066590 FELIX LLC, ROBERT W STOP SMOKING WITH HYPNOSIS~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 367.50 Total :367.50 94722 3/8/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0080122 WATER METER INVENTORY - M-METER-02-010 WATER METER INVENTORY - M-METER-02-010 411.000.000.141.170.310.00 6,946.68 Freight 411.000.000.141.170.310.00 117.11 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.170.310.00 628.67 Total :7,692.46 94723 3/8/2007 071496 FIRST MUTUAL BANK E5AC.Final Retainage E5AC.Dennis Craig Retainage #2 E5AC.Dennis Craig Retainage #2 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 1,567.36 Total :1,567.36 94724 3/8/2007 071532 FISCHER, LINDA 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94725 3/8/2007 071546 FLUID TECH INC 133448 PRESSURE SWITCH PRESSURE SWITCH 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 504.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.80 Total :510.80 94726 3/8/2007 010660 FOSTER, MARLO 32 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 150.00 Total :150.00 94727 3/8/2007 071533 FRAZIER, RICHARD 20907 JURY FEE 13Page: Packet Page 33 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94727 3/8/2007 (Continued)071533 FRAZIER, RICHARD JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94728 3/8/2007 071522 GALCO INDUSTRIAL 81236201 067253 VFD PART 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 99.24 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 45.50 Total :144.74 94729 3/8/2007 071521 GEORGE GODDARD INC 207-215 LAB SINK LAB SINK 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 379.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 33.35 Total :412.35 94730 3/8/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 12047 STREET - CEMENT FOR SIDEWALKS STREET - CEMENT FOR SIDEWALKS 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 392.40 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 34.53 Total :426.93 94731 3/8/2007 071534 GOOTEE, LAURIE 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94732 3/8/2007 012190 GORSUCH, BRUCE GORSUCH7533 VOLLEYBALL SKILLS VOLLEYBALL INTERMEDIATE SKILLS~ 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 720.00 Total :720.00 94733 3/8/2007 069864 GRAPHIC ENTERPRISES INC AR123639 METER CHARGES FOR K&E/8036-BLDG DEPT. 14Page: Packet Page 34 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94733 3/8/2007 (Continued)069864 GRAPHIC ENTERPRISES INC METER CHARGES FOR K&E/8036-BLDG DEPT. 001.000.620.524.100.480.00 55.03 Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.480.00 4.90 Total :59.93 94734 3/8/2007 067476 GROUP FOUR INC 66804 E7JA.2007 Waterline Survey E7JA.2007 Waterline Survey 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 5,000.00 E7JA.2007 Waterline Survey66974 E7JA.2007 Waterline Survey 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 500.00 Total :5,500.00 94735 3/8/2007 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 77091 WATER - 4 1/12" NST X 4" STORZ WATER - 4 1/12" NST X 4" STORZ 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 435.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 33.06 Total :468.06 94736 3/8/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2045730 WATER - DEBUR TOOL WATER - DEBUR TOOL 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 26.63 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.35 Total :28.98 94737 3/8/2007 071526 HODGSON, HOLLY HODGSON0227 REFUND REFUND FOR CANCELLED CLASS 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 63.00 Total :63.00 94738 3/8/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 027997 OPS SUPPLIES stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 54.01 15Page: Packet Page 35 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :54.01947383/8/2007 070896 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 94739 3/8/2007 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP S/P2864983 CUSTOMER # S114983 2/2007 Superpages.com 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 69.90 Total :69.90 94740 3/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72435506 COPIER LEASE PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 22.87 Total :22.87 94741 3/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72435501 Finance Copier Rental 2/22-3/21/07 Finance Copier Rental 2/22-3/21/07 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07 Meter Charge 1/3-2/3/07 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 138.05 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 52.71 Total :644.83 94742 3/8/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72435483 RENT ON RECEPTION COPIER RENT ON RECEPTION COPIER 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 75.89 RENT ON LARGE COPIER72435491 RENT ON LARGE COPIER 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,035.03 RENT ON ENG. COLOR COPIER72435497 RENT ON ENG. COLOR COPIER 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 356.11 Total :1,467.03 94743 3/8/2007 014430 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC CO INC 0029003 018325 MOTOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 448.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 38.53 16Page: Packet Page 36 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :486.53947433/8/2007 014430 014430 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC CO INC 94744 3/8/2007 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 410951 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTERNET INTERNET ACCESS FOR MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00 Total :15.00 94745 3/8/2007 069179 INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC E5JA.Pmt #1 E5JA.2005 Waterline thru 02/07 E5JA.2005 Waterline thru 02/07 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 149,595.65 E7JA.Retainage 1 412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -6,868.49 Total :142,727.16 94746 3/8/2007 061614 J J SHOE REPAIR & ALTERATION 4688 OPS REPAIRS & MAINT Hepler boot repair 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 60.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 5.34 Total :65.34 94747 3/8/2007 068737 JOHNSON ROBERTS & ASSOC 106415 INV#106415 EDMONDS PD PRE-OFFER PHQ - GIBENS 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 15.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 1.26 Total :16.26 94748 3/8/2007 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER KIDZ7543 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 17Page: Packet Page 37 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94748 3/8/2007 (Continued)071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7543 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,067.50 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7542 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 811.30 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7541 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 939.40 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7540 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 640.50 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7539 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 341.60 Total :3,800.30 94749 3/8/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 74730 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING Soucy boots 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 505.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 44.44 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING75507 Turner rescue boots 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 160.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 14.08 SOUCY RETURNED BOOTS RE: INV7473075613 Soucy ret. wrong size boots 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 -225.60 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 -19.85 Total :478.07 94750 3/8/2007 071536 LAIRD-BURRIS, NANCY 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94751 3/8/2007 067475 LANDSVERK QUALITY HOMES INC 2-16730 RE: 19524 94TH PL W EDMONDS UB REF 18Page: Packet Page 38 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94751 3/8/2007 (Continued)067475 LANDSVERK QUALITY HOMES INC 19524 94TH Pl W Edmonds Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 134.22 Total :134.22 94752 3/8/2007 068493 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP DISTRIBU 03010703 INV#03010703 EDMONDS PD STREAMLIGHT TLR-1 LED WEAPON LIGHT 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 353.85 Freight 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 7.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 31.84 Total :393.64 94753 3/8/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 2007-270 SUPPLIES FUEL FILTERS 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 14.51 Freight 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 11.30 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.30 Total :28.11 94754 3/8/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093453 SISTER CITY SUPPLIES SISTER CITY LETTERHEAD 623.200.210.557.210.490.00 128.00 Sales Tax 623.200.210.557.210.490.00 11.39 Total :139.39 94755 3/8/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093380 Markers Markers 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 6.24 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 0.56 Total :6.80 19Page: Packet Page 39 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94756 3/8/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093265 BUSINESS CARDS COURT CS DS P&R Business Cards:~250-00134 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 42.20 Stephen Clifton250-00134 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 17.20 Jenny Readwin250-00134 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 17.20 Michael Snook250-00134 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 17.20 Rich Lindsay250-00134 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 17.20 Sales Tax 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 3.76 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 1.53 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 3.06 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.53 LOGO WINDOW ENVELOPES CITY CLERK093398 City Clerk Logo Envelope~250-00136 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 295.00 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 26.26 Total :442.14 94757 3/8/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 515210 STORM - SPOT LIGHT FOR SWEEPER STORM - SPOT LIGHT FOR SWEEPER 411.000.652.542.320.310.00 11.43 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.310.00 1.02 Total :12.45 94758 3/8/2007 071547 MAINSTREAM MECHANICAL INC 1165 REPAIR EVAPORATOR LEAK 20Page: Packet Page 40 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94758 3/8/2007 (Continued)071547 MAINSTREAM MECHANICAL INC REPAIR EVAPORATOR LEAK 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 356.23 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 31.70 Total :387.93 94759 3/8/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 2906 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 INTERPRETER FEE2907 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 150.00 INTERPRETER FEE2908 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 90.00 INTERPRETER FEE2915 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 INTERPRETER FEE2916 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 INTERPRETER FEE2917 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 60.00 INTERPRETER FEE2923 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 120.00 INTERPRETER FEE2924 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 Total :600.00 94760 3/8/2007 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 42829 YOST POOL IMPROVEMENTS 21Page: Packet Page 41 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94760 3/8/2007 (Continued)019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC MERMAID FILTER LEAVES 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 2,475.00 Freight 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 558.25 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 269.96 Total :3,303.21 94761 3/8/2007 071537 MATE, ZSOLT 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94762 3/8/2007 064047 MCCONNELL & ASSOCIATES 857 HEARING EX. SERVICES FOR FEB. 2007. HEARING EX. SERVICES FOR FEB. 2007. 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,334.23 Total :3,334.23 94763 3/8/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 60016493 123106800 FLOWMETER/WASTE CONTAINER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 196.82 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.38 12310680060128007 GLASS BEAD/FLOWMETER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 619.76 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 48.04 12310680060285469 WASTE CONTAINER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 61.86 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.73 Total :936.59 22Page: Packet Page 42 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94764 3/8/2007 071487 MED-TECH RESOURCE INC 25916 INV#25916 EDMONDS PD STREAMLIGHT SL20 BATTERIES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 141.72 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 7.39 Total :149.11 94765 3/8/2007 069285 MERCER MD, JAMES 1002-007 ALS PROF SERVICES Feb '07 med prgm dir 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,644.75 Total :1,644.75 94766 3/8/2007 069592 METROCALL Q0298897B INV#Q0298897B ACCT#02988970 EDMONDS PD PAGER SERVICE 2/27-3/26/07 001.000.410.521.100.420.00 79.65 Total :79.65 94767 3/8/2007 071538 MILLER, DIANE 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94768 3/8/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 40802 STORM - SPROCKET & GEAR GREASE FOR STORM - SPROCKET & GEAR GREASE FOR 111.000.653.542.710.310.00 3.95 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.710.310.00 0.35 Total :4.30 94769 3/8/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 40658 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS sharpen chain 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 105.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 9.35 23Page: Packet Page 43 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94769 3/8/2007 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS40984 25' reel of chain 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 700.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 62.30 Total :876.65 94770 3/8/2007 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0193255-IN STREET - OVERALLS FOR SUMMER HELP STREET - OVERALLS FOR SUMMER HELP 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 187.50 JACKETS FOR SUMMER HELP 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 150.00 XXL JACKET 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 41.00 Freight 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 12.08 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 34.37 Total :424.95 94771 3/8/2007 024001 NC MACHINERY CO SECS0431990 UNIT 50 - KEYS UNIT 50 - KEYS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 40.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.52 UNIT 50 - SHIPPING AND HANDLING FORSECS0431991 UNIT 50 - SHIPPING AND HANDLING FOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.23 Total :58.75 94772 3/8/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0320591-IN FLEET INVENTORY - FILTER 24Page: Packet Page 44 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94772 3/8/2007 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM FLEET INVENTORY - FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 9.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 0.86 FLEET - DIESEL 535 GAL0321179-IN FLEET - DIESEL 535 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1,009.38 FED EX TAX, FED LUST/OIL SPILL TAX, 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 322.94 Total :1,343.17 94773 3/8/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 323912314 323912314-063 IT Cell Phone Service 1/25-2/24/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 174.11 Total :174.11 94774 3/8/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 411191318-063 CELLULAR CHARGES 1/25-2/24/07 - BLDG CELLULAR CHARGES 1/25-2/24/07 - BLDG 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 107.95 Total :107.95 94775 3/8/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 976032312 COMMUNICATIONS Admin 001.000.510.522.100.420.00 35.97 Operations 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 437.08 Prevention 001.000.510.522.300.420.00 76.19 ALS 001.000.510.526.100.420.00 67.21 Total :616.45 94776 3/8/2007 024910 NORMED 24808-516250 INV#24808-516250 EDMONDS PD 25Page: Packet Page 45 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94776 3/8/2007 (Continued)024910 NORMED CETAFEN EXTRA 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.95 ASPIRIN 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.52 CETAFEN 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.69 BANDAGES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.39 VIONEX TOWLETTES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 39.16 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.40 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.17 INV#24808-516392 EDMONDS PD24808-516392 RELIEF-SF COLD CAPSULES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.24 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.15 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.35 Total :93.02 94777 3/8/2007 063034 NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES 213821 13465 BOD STANDARD 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 45.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 7.59 Total :52.59 94778 3/8/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0076980 SODIUM BISULFILTE SODIUM BISULFILTE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 408.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 36.31 26Page: Packet Page 46 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :444.31947783/8/2007 066391 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 94779 3/8/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0430915 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 Total :95.36 94780 3/8/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 459 MINUTES 2/8/07 - HPC - PLAN. DEPT. MINUTES 2/8/07 - HPC - PLAN. DEPT. 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 135.00 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 2/28/07000 00 461 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 2/28/07 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 210.00 Total :345.00 94781 3/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 034202 OFFICE SUPPLIES ROLODEX 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 14.56 King County Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 1.19 CREDIT FOR RISER144265 CREDIT FOR MONITOR RISER 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 -27.98 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 -2.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES216269 RULER 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 5.75 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 0.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES987837 MONITOR RISER 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 28.98 King County Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.46 Total :22.92 27Page: Packet Page 47 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94782 3/8/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 263881 WATER - INK CARTIDGES WATER - INK CARTIDGES 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 45.13 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - CLIPS, POST-ITS, 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.92 King County Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.28 Total :65.33 94783 3/8/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 WATER 220TH ST SW & 84TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 10.11 WATER0001530 820 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 97.64 WATER0002930 5TH & ST RTE 104/SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 11.78 WATER0005060 9803 EDMONDS WAY 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 11.78 Total :131.31 94784 3/8/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00044981 UNIT 55 - WASHERS, LOCKNUTS, SCREWS, UNIT 55 - WASHERS, LOCKNUTS, SCREWS, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 69.04 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.15 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.80 Total :83.99 94785 3/8/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 42092 STORM - DUMP FEES 28Page: Packet Page 48 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94785 3/8/2007 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 FUEL SCHG 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 1.32 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 0.09 STORM - DUMP FEES42101 STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 88.00 FUEL SCHG 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 1.32 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 0.09 STORM DUMP FEES42112 STORM DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 128.00 FUEL SCHG 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 1.92 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 0.14 Total :308.88 94786 3/8/2007 064070 PALMATIER, LISA PALMATIER0207 CONCERT COORDINATION CONCERT COORDINATOR~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 180.00 Total :180.00 94787 3/8/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9465970 COPIER CONTRACT COPIER CONTRACT 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 12.60 Total :157.82 94788 3/8/2007 071539 PARK, MICHAEL 20907 JURY FEE 29Page: Packet Page 49 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94788 3/8/2007 (Continued)071539 PARK, MICHAEL JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94789 3/8/2007 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.517641 PAINT & SUPPLIES PAINT, TRAYS, ROLLER COVERS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 88.94 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.92 Total :96.86 94790 3/8/2007 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 26009-00010 E5AB.SR99 Traffic thru 2/25/07 E5AB.SR99 Traffic thru 2/25/07 001.000.620.532.200.410.00 712.62 Total :712.62 94791 3/8/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 5778 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES M-16 supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 75.96 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 6.76 Total :82.72 94792 3/8/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY 411.000.656.538.800.472.63 1,833.15 Total :1,833.15 94793 3/8/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0230757007 PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 453.76 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 329.80 30Page: Packet Page 50 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94793 3/8/2007 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 29.59 Total :813.15 94794 3/8/2007 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 07-069 COURTROOM SECURITY COURTROOM SECURITY 001.000.230.512.500.410.00 1,610.00 Total :1,610.00 94795 3/8/2007 065579 QUIKSIGN 55251 MICHEL/ADB-06-154 - SIGN INSTALLATION. MICHEL/ADB-06-154 - SIGN INSTALLATION. 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 156.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 13.73 Total :169.73 94796 3/8/2007 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 74573 MARKER MARKER: CARETTA 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 285.00 INSCRIPTION74574 INSCRIPTION: NIXON 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00 MARKER75105 MARKER: VANDER SYS 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 260.00 INSCRIPTION75106 INSCRIPTION: SMITH 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00 INSCRIPTION75107 INSCRIPTION: SNELL 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 83.00 Total :778.00 94797 3/8/2007 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0702072 E5MC.Services thru 2/23/07 31Page: Packet Page 51 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94797 3/8/2007 (Continued)031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC E5MC.Services thru 2/23/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 3,487.00 Total :3,487.00 94798 3/8/2007 071554 REZVANI, FARSHID AND KATHERINE 4-05175 UTILITY REFUND Duffy/Rezvani 8423 198th St SW, Edmonds 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 81.69 Total :81.69 94799 3/8/2007 071540 RIECK, CLIFFORD 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94800 3/8/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412128620 STREET - ASPHALT STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 31.68 STORM DUMP FEES9412138155 STORM DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 169.90 STORM - ASPHALT 411.000.652.542.320.310.00 499.20 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.310.00 42.94 STORM - ASPHALT9412138157 STORM - ASPHALT 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 31.68 STORM - DUMP FEES9412147908 STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 54.80 32Page: Packet Page 52 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94800 3/8/2007 (Continued)068484 RINKER MATERIALS STREET - ASPHALT9412147919 STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 31.68 STORM - ASPHALT9412159825 STORM - ASPHALT 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 240.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 21.12 STORM - ASPHALT9412191291 STORM - ASPHALT 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 374.16 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 32.93 Total :2,610.09 94801 3/8/2007 071541 ROBBINS, JOHNATHON 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94802 3/8/2007 071525 ROMINE, RENEA 127990 SPAY/NEUTER REFUND FOR RECEIPT 127990 SPAY/NEUTER REFUND - ANIMAL ALREADY 001.000.000.343.930.000.00 50.00 Total :50.00 94803 3/8/2007 071542 RYAN, MARJORIE 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94804 3/8/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 02/26/07 02/26/07 BILLING - EDMONDS AC ACCT#70014 ANIMAL DISPOSAL 2/12&2/19/07 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 48.75 33Page: Packet Page 53 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :48.75948043/8/2007 071467 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 94805 3/8/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY SAWDON0303 GYM MONITOR ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR FOR DANCE 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 48.00 Total :48.00 94806 3/8/2007 065001 SCHIRMAN, RON 29 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,721.48 Total :1,721.48 94807 3/8/2007 069219 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES COR 2024467 043133501 RENTAL DI TANKS 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 643.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 56.64 Total :700.14 94808 3/8/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0057621-IN UNIT K93 - B LINK FLASHER UNIT K93 - B LINK FLASHER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 90.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.50 UNIT 488 - STREAMLIGHT SL20X BATTERY0058042-IN UNIT 488 - STREAMLIGHT SL20X BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 154.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.50 Total :282.00 94809 3/8/2007 071543 SMITH, KEVIN 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94810 3/8/2007 060889 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ESV/10588030 FLEET - CHARCOAL FILTER 34Page: Packet Page 54 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94810 3/8/2007 (Continued)060889 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL FLEET - CHARCOAL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.85 Total :34.85 94811 3/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2340031869 MINI PARK RESTROOMS MINI PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 276.01 BRACKETT'S LANDING BATH HOUSE3010022725 BRACKETT'S LANDING BATH HOUSE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 246.84 UTILITY BILLING3110774142 23202 EDMONDS WAY 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 123.66 IRRIGATION SYSTEM5100017325 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 38.16 Total :684.67 94812 3/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 192006345 463-001-705-3 23219 74TH AVE W 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 26.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.57 Total :27.79 94813 3/8/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2180017895 BEACON LIGHT CROSS WALK BEACON LIGHT CROSS WALK 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 32.04 SIGNAL LIGHT2710014826 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 95.95 35Page: Packet Page 55 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94813 3/8/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 SIGNAL LIGHT2900012432 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.28 SIGNAL LIGHT3630019994 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 82.72 Ballinger Lift Station 7403 Ballinger3900430020 Ballinger Lift Station 7403 Ballinger 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.79 SIGNAL LIGHT5450010938 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 176.96 Total :443.74 94814 3/8/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 33940 "COMPLETED" STAMP - BLDG DEPT. "COMPLETED" STAMP - BLDG DEPT. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 19.38 Total :19.38 94815 3/8/2007 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT C000106 ACCT ID C000106 - ROSSI/EDMONDS HEP B SHOT 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 64.00 Total :64.00 94816 3/8/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC Mar-07 03/07 Recreation Services Contract Fee 03/07 Recreation Services Contract Fee 001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67 Total :4,791.67 94817 3/8/2007 070678 SORVAG, BRIGID SORVAG0305 REFUND REFUND FOR CANCELLED CLASS 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 75.00 Total :75.00 94818 3/8/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/0207 DISPOSAL SERVICES 36Page: Packet Page 56 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94818 3/8/2007 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 576.16 Total :576.16 94819 3/8/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS garbage & recycle for PS 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 487.49 garbage & recycle for Library03586 garbage & recycle for Library 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 491.20 garbage & recycle-City Hall03588 garbage & recycle-City Hall 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 379.46 Total :1,358.15 94820 3/8/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4107217-01 SEWER - WORK JEANS SEWER - WORK JEANS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 159.75 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 14.22 STORM - WORK PANTS - R WICHERS4107256-01 STORM - WORK PANTS - R WICHERS 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 184.80 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 16.45 SEWER - WORK JEANS - J CLEMENS4107258-01 SEWER - WORK JEANS - J CLEMENS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 157.50 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 14.02 BOOT EXCH - D CRAWFORD4107580-01 BOOT EXCH - D CRAWFORD 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 4.40 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 0.39 37Page: Packet Page 57 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94820 3/8/2007 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS STORM - WORK JEANS - K CLARKE4107625-01 STORM - WORK JEANS - K CLARKE 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 165.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 14.69 WATER - 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE -~4107675-01 WATER - 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE -~ 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 152.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 13.53 STORM - WORK JEANS - D BROWNING4107910-01 STORM - WORK JEANS - D BROWNING 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 152.90 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 13.61 Total :1,063.26 94821 3/8/2007 070677 SPRINT Eng.Feb 2007 Engineering Nextel thru 02/24/07 Engineering Nextel thru 02/24/07 001.000.620.532.200.420.00 539.53 Total :539.53 94822 3/8/2007 067148 STERNBERG LANTERNS INC 00110159 STREET - REPLACEMENT LAMP PAID FOR BY STREET - REPLACEMENT LAMP PAID FOR BY 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 4,588.00 Total :4,588.00 94823 3/8/2007 040250 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING 139118 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES MISC. FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 411.11 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 34.94 Total :446.05 94824 3/8/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 910298 FS 17 - ELECT SUPPLIES 38Page: Packet Page 58 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94824 3/8/2007 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY FS 17 - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.68 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.04 Total :61.72 94825 3/8/2007 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 3/6/07 3/30/07 Seminar - Employment law (Debi 3/30/07 Seminar - Employment law (Debi 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 65.00 3/30/07 Seminar - Employment law (Mary 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 45.00 Total :110.00 94826 3/8/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10501129 SUPPLIES WEDGE ANCHORS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 115.80 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.72 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.82 Total :132.34 94827 3/8/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10494738 STORM - 25 LB WIPING CLOTHS, LANTERN STORM - 25 LB WIPING CLOTHS, LANTERN 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 107.56 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 9.57 STORM - UPSIDE DOWN FL GREEN PAINT10496532 STORM - UPSIDE DOWN FL GREEN PAINT 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 285.84 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 25.44 39Page: Packet Page 59 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94827 3/8/2007 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC STORM - WORK GLOVES10496533 STORM - WORK GLOVES 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 269.80 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 24.01 Total :722.22 94828 3/8/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 38371 WATER/SEWER - WORK - POCKET T'S WATER/SEWER - WORK - POCKET T'S 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 144.50 WATER/SEWER - WORK - POCKET T'S 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 144.50 WORK - LONG SLEEVED POCKET T'S 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 304.75 WORK - LONG SLEEVED POCKET T'S 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 304.75 UPCHARGE FOR 4 XXL 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 6.00 UPCHARGE FOR 4 XXL 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 6.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 40.52 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 40.52 40Page: Packet Page 60 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94828 3/8/2007 (Continued)040916 TC SPAN AMERICA WATER/SEWER - HATS38373 WATER/SEWER - HATS 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 48.00 WATER/SEWER - HATS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 48.00 HATS 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 45.00 HATS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 45.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.28 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 8.28 Total :1,194.10 94829 3/8/2007 068201 THE ACTIVE NETWORK LTD LTD002385 CLASS RECEIPTING SOFTWARE/HARDWARE SYS Class Receipting Software/Hardware 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 1,439.50 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 806.12 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 2,245.62 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 1,266.76 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 128.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 71.74 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 199.86 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 112.74 41Page: Packet Page 61 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94829 3/8/2007 (Continued)068201 THE ACTIVE NETWORK LTD CLASS RECEIPTING SOFTWARE/HARDWARE SYSLTD002470 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 250.00 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 140.00 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 390.00 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 220.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 22.25 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 12.46 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 34.71 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 19.58 Total :7,359.46 94830 3/8/2007 068201 THE ACTIVE NETWORK LTD INC001781 CLASS RECEIPTING SOFTWARE/HARDWARE SYS 42Page: Packet Page 62 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94830 3/8/2007 (Continued)068201 THE ACTIVE NETWORK LTD Class Receipting Software/Hardware 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 31.25 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 17.50 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 48.75 Class Receipting Software/Hardware 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 27.50 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 2.78 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 1.56 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 4.34 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 2.45 Total :136.13 94831 3/8/2007 066197 THE BENTLEY COMPANY 596307-001 WATER/SEWER - VULCAN SHANKS, PADS WATER/SEWER - VULCAN SHANKS, PADS 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 150.85 WATER/SEWER - VULCAN SHANKS, PADS 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 150.85 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.14 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.13 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.81 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 13.81 Total :341.59 94832 3/8/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY C/A 148134 Parks Dept. BPW, #07-06 43Page: Packet Page 63 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94832 3/8/2007 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY Parks Dept. BPW, #07-06 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 39.51 Lead Water Maint. Worker, #07-04 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.96 CIO, #07-05 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.96 Transportation Eng., #07-07 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 39.51 Parks Dept. Laborer, #07-08 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.24 Parks MW I, #07-09 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 38.79 Total :221.97 94833 3/8/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1481670 NEWSPAPER AD Ordinance 3629 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 28.80 NEWSPAPER ADS1481672 Ordinance 3628 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 28.80 NEWSPAPER AD1481673 Ordinance 3627 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 24.48 Total :82.08 94834 3/8/2007 071550 THE PROP SHOP 18108 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES spare propeller 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 550.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 48.95 Total :598.95 94835 3/8/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES C/A 042483000 Transportation Eng., #07-07 44Page: Packet Page 64 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94835 3/8/2007 (Continued)066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES Transportation Eng., #07-07 001.000.620.532.200.440.00 237.98 Transportation Eng., #07-07 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 237.97 Parks Dept. BPW, #07-06 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 268.52 Lead Water Maint. Worker, #07-04 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 220.14 CIO, #07-05 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 220.14 Parks Dept. Laborer, #07-08 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 295.14 Total :1,479.89 94836 3/8/2007 071544 THORSRUD, HEIDI 20907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total :14.85 94837 3/8/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 638278 MONITORING-PS monitoring-PS~ 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 35.15 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING FEB 07648652 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING FEB 07 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.57 Total :45.72 94838 3/8/2007 068254 TOWERS, LORRIE C 01-JAN07 PRO TEM JUDGE PRO TEM JUDGE 001.000.230.512.510.410.00 97.50 Total :97.50 94839 3/8/2007 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES 2/28/07 MEBT 2 services thru 2/28/2007 MEBT 2 services thru 2/28/2007 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 133.73 45Page: Packet Page 65 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :133.73948393/8/2007 068249 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES 94840 3/8/2007 071545 TRIMMER, KIM TRIMMER7941 YOGA PLAY YOGA PLAY #7941 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 224.00 Total :224.00 94841 3/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.83 EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY425-771-4741 EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 48.13 Total :90.96 94842 3/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-DHO-0667 DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOCOM Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom 2/19- 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 350.09 Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet Access425-NW2-0887 Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet Access 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00 Total :630.09 94843 3/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.03 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 269.35 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR425-206-1137 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 53.00 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-1141 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.43 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.22 46Page: Packet Page 66 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94843 3/8/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-4810 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.17 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.32 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE425-712-8347 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 57.03 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST425-778-3297 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 17.77 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 32.99 Total :748.31 94844 3/8/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE FS #16-FAX LINE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.25 FS #20 PHONE SERVICE425-778-2153 FS #20 PHONE SERVICE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 47.08 FS #16 FRAME RELAY425-FLO-0017 FS #16 FRAME RELAY 001.000.510.528.600.420.00 354.07 Total :451.40 94845 3/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 764466185-00001 CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 3.00 Total :3.00 94846 3/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2114225707 965420720-00001 PRETREATMENT CELL 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 36.18 Total :36.18 47Page: Packet Page 67 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94847 3/8/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2117297233 INV#2117297233 ACCT#470497482-00001 CELL PHONES 2/24-3/23/07 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 121.39 Total :121.39 94848 3/8/2007 069889 VETERINARY SPECIALTY CENTER 53962 INV#53962 CLIENT#7257 EDMONDS PD EMERGENCY VISIT - DASH 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 45.00 BIOHAZARD FEE 001.000.410.521.260.410.00 4.48 Total :49.48 94849 3/8/2007 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 0731775-2677-6 202-0001256-2677-0 ASH DISPOSAL 411.000.656.538.800.474.65 3,605.28 Total :3,605.28 94850 3/8/2007 071484 WESTERN SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 48573 FAC MAINT - MICROWAVE DETECTOR FAC MAINT - MICROWAVE DETECTOR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.95 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.03 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.96 Total :48.94 94851 3/8/2007 071551 ZIMMERLUND, PER Insp Fee Refund Refund unused inspection fees Refund unused inspection fees 001.000.000.343.200.000.00 300.00 Total :300.00 Bank total :476,953.46180 Vouchers for bank code :front 476,953.46Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report180 48Page: Packet Page 68 of 433 03/08/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 12:12:18PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 49Page: Packet Page 69 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94852 3/15/2007 071373 AGRO DISTRIBUTING LLC 2168259 RI FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES IRON SULFATE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,272.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 111.94 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES2180393 RI FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 297.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.14 Total :1,707.08 94853 3/15/2007 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101133192 M5Z34 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 81.08 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 7.14 Total :88.22 94854 3/15/2007 070348 AIRPURE 12372177 879400 FILTERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 80.43 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.66 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.08 Total :95.17 94855 3/15/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8209 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR FEB MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR FEB 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 77,883.10 Total :77,883.10 94856 3/15/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 475690 FLEET INVENTORY - 3 BATTERIES 1Page: Packet Page 70 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94856 3/15/2007 (Continued)014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE FLEET INVENTORY - 3 BATTERIES 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 189.85 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 16.90 Total :206.75 94857 3/15/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 704593 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES - LAMPS, WIRE WHEEL FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES - LAMPS, WIRE WHEEL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 48.08 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.28 UNIT 124 - BATTERY881170 UNIT 124 - BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 68.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.14 SHOP SUPPLIES - GATES SEALED LEAD ACID881785 SHOP SUPPLIES - GATES SEALED LEAD ACID 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 48.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.13 Total :179.58 94858 3/15/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 110425121 INV#110425121 116275 EDMONDS PD BATTERIES 104.000.410.521.210.310.00 284.30 Sales Tax 104.000.410.521.210.310.00 25.30 Total :309.60 94859 3/15/2007 066415 ALLIED BODY WORKS INC 17010 UNIT 25 - LOCK SUPPLIES 2Page: Packet Page 71 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94859 3/15/2007 (Continued)066415 ALLIED BODY WORKS INC UNIT 25 - LOCK SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 33.50 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.98 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.83 Total :47.31 94860 3/15/2007 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-000813891 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY Public Works Facility 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.76 Public Works Facility 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 78.88 Public Works Facility 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 78.88 Public Works Facility 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 78.88 Public Works Facility 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 78.88 Public Works Facility 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 78.87 FIRE STATION #20~197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20~ 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 84.34 0197-000813963197-0801132 garbage for F/S #16~ 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 94.02 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 7.49 INVOICE 0197-000814647197-0829729 garbage for MCC~ 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 47.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 5.11 3Page: Packet Page 72 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :653.61948603/15/2007 061540 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 94861 3/15/2007 065568 ALLWATER INC 030807086 COEWASTE DRINKING WATER 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 30.85 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 1.42 Total :32.27 94862 3/15/2007 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 2013 TREE REMOVAL TAKE DOWN OF 4 DEAD CHERRY TREES AND 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,500.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 132.00 TREE REMOVAL2014 TREE REMOVAL AT MAPLEWOOD PARK 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 200.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 17.60 TREE REMOVAL2015 TAKE DOWN OF LEANING TREE IN MAPLEWOOD 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 300.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 26.40 TREE REMOVAL2016 REMOVAL OF 2 MAPLES & CUT INTO 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,600.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 140.80 Total :3,916.80 94863 3/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3832806 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 35.46 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.16 4Page: Packet Page 73 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :38.62948633/15/2007 069751 069751 ARAMARK 94864 3/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3832808 18386001 MATS 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 85.06 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 7.57 Total :92.63 94865 3/15/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3831251 FLEET MAINT UNIFORM SVC FLEET MAINT UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 5Page: Packet Page 74 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94865 3/15/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS512-3831252 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-3832807 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 6Page: Packet Page 75 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :94.41948653/15/2007 069751 069751 ARAMARK 94866 3/15/2007 071120 ASHLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 2500026790 113009/0702 POLYMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.51 1,937.50 Total :1,937.50 94867 3/15/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 555365 FLEET INVENTORY - DIESEL 180 GAL FLEET INVENTORY - DIESEL 180 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 351.43 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, WA HAZ SUBS 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 64.30 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 Total :480.53 94868 3/15/2007 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM PARKS FAX MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 32.07 Total :32.07 94869 3/15/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 39588 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS 7Page: Packet Page 76 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94869 3/15/2007 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER UB Outsourcing area #200 PRINTING 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 89.29 UB Outsourcing area #200 PRINTING 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 89.29 UB Outsourcing area #200 PRINTING 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 89.55 UB Outsourcing area #200 POSTAGE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 250.40 UB Outsourcing area #200 POSTAGE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 250.40 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 7.79 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 7.79 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 8.02 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS39624 UB Outsourcing area #700 PRINTING 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 23.31 UB Outsourcing area #700 PRINTING 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 23.31 UB Outsourcing area #700 PRINTING 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 23.37 UB Outsourcing area #700 POSTAGE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 86.39 UB Outsourcing area #700 POSTAGE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 86.38 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.03 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.03 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.10 Total :1,041.45 8Page: Packet Page 77 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94870 3/15/2007 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 66707 RANGER BADGES FLAT GOLD BADGES 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 52.50 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 4.68 Total :57.18 94871 3/15/2007 002343 BILL HATCH SPORTING GOODS 19713-00 OPS UNIFORMS Beanies 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 653.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 57.51 Total :711.01 94872 3/15/2007 071553 BLACKHAWK PRODUCTS GROUP LLC 796317 INV#796317 CUST#0098020 EDMONDS PD BHI CHALKER SLING 104.000.410.521.210.310.00 59.99 Freight 104.000.410.521.210.310.00 9.95 Total :69.94 94873 3/15/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 572263 INV#572263 EDMONDS PD - GANNON DUTY BELT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.04 Total :49.99 94874 3/15/2007 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC IE02444 UNIT 53 - SWITCH UNIT 53 - SWITCH 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 44.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.87 Total :48.82 94875 3/15/2007 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 276569 ROCKERY SUPPLIES 9Page: Packet Page 78 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94875 3/15/2007 (Continued)003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL ROCKERY ROCK 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 515.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.14 Total :554.14 94876 3/15/2007 070954 CASCADE MEDICAL CENTER 07-021 PARAMEDIC LECTURE SERIES 2007 Hoover/Paramedic Lecture Series 2007 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 275.00 Total :275.00 94877 3/15/2007 068660 CCECO LAB AND FILTRATION 12692 C0270 FILTERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 288.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.29 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 26.43 Total :326.72 94878 3/15/2007 067446 CEM CORPORATION 285405 306951 MICROWAVE PARTS 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 313.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 87.90 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 27.86 Total :428.76 94879 3/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN02071015 HELIUM HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BIRTHDAY PARTIES 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.69 Total :8.44 10Page: Packet Page 79 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94880 3/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN02071017 2954000 ARGON/NITROGEN/OXYGEN 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 31.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.76 Total :33.76 94881 3/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN02071013 FLEET CYLINDER RENTAL FLEET CYLINDER RENTAL 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 0.69 SEWER CYLINDER RENTALRN02071016 SEWER CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 0.69 WATER - CYLINDER RENTALRN02071018 WATER - CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.654.534.800.450.00 31.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.450.00 2.76 Total :50.64 94882 3/15/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY104343 ALS medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 46.90 hydrotest cylinders 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 81.25 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 19.67 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.86 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 7.29 11Page: Packet Page 80 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94882 3/15/2007 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY ALS SUPPLIESLY104344 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 37.52 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 14.44 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 4.62 ALS SUPPLIESLY104345 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 18.76 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.91 Total :253.19 94883 3/15/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT7657 FRIDAY NIGHTS OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #7657 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 89.60 Total :89.60 94884 3/15/2007 003710 CHEVRON USA 7898305185703 INV#7898305185703 ACCT#789-830-518-5 FUEL 104.000.410.521.210.320.00 257.37 CAR WASHES 104.000.410.521.210.480.00 15.00 Total :272.37 94885 3/15/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 425-418-8755 INV #150421551X03042007 425.418.8755 Service 2/28-3/27/07 001.000.310.514.100.420.00 130.10 Total :130.10 94886 3/15/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-369-4557 CELL PHONE FLEET 12Page: Packet Page 81 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94886 3/15/2007 (Continued)064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS cell phone fleet 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 5.04 Total :5.04 94887 3/15/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 4X03032007 ALS COMMUNICATIONS IRIS 001.000.510.526.100.420.00 44.91 OPS COMMUNICATIONSX03082007 vehicles' wireless 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 147.10 Total :192.01 94888 3/15/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460577354 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 OPERATIONS UNIFORMS460577355 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51 OPS UNIFORMS460578434 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 Total :301.81 94889 3/15/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5216 MAINT/OPERATION SANITARY SEWAGE CHARGE MAINT/OPERATION SANITARY SEWAGE CHARGE 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83 Total :13,800.83 94890 3/15/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5221 INV#5221 CUST#47 EDMONDS PD 13Page: Packet Page 82 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94890 3/15/2007 (Continued)019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD PRISONER R&B JANUARY 2007 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,196.11 Total :5,196.11 94891 3/15/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR FEB 07 WATER USEAGE FOR FEB 07 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 420.00 Total :420.00 94892 3/15/2007 070231 CNR INC 11138 03/07 MAINT PHONE SYSTEM 03/07 Phone Maintenance 001.000.390.528.800.480.00 736.67 Sales Tax 001.000.390.528.800.480.00 65.56 Total :802.23 94893 3/15/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES E1757969 FAC - ROLL TOWELS, CREW NEUTRAL FAC - ROLL TOWELS, CREW NEUTRAL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 411.96 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.47 FAC MAINT - TT, ROLL TOWELS, BIGFOLDW1759606 FAC MAINT - TT, ROLL TOWELS, BIGFOLD 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 830.22 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 73.28 Total :1,356.93 94894 3/15/2007 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-8109 UNIT 12 REPLACEMENT- NEW 2008 FORD 14Page: Packet Page 83 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94894 3/15/2007 (Continued)069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC UNIT 12 REPLACEMENT- NEW 2008 FORD 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 19,224.40 Cowlitz Co 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1,537.95 Total :20,762.35 94895 3/15/2007 004595 CONKLIN APPLIANCE A039663 FS 17 - WHIRLPOOL DISHWASHER FS 17 - WHIRLPOOL DISHWASHER 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 499.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 44.41 Total :543.41 94896 3/15/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 6621961 ACC NO 1126518 pagers-water~ 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 11.42 pagers-streets~ 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 0.27 pagers-storm~ 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 4.22 pagers-facilities 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 23.70 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.15 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 0.03 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 0.42 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 2.38 Total :43.59 94897 3/15/2007 004867 COOPER, JACK F 34 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 76.00 15Page: Packet Page 84 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :76.00948973/15/2007 004867 004867 COOPER, JACK F 94898 3/15/2007 068815 CORRECT EQUIPMENT 7992 SEAL SEAL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 27.35 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.98 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.93 Total :36.26 94899 3/15/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0418 OPS UNIFORMS Batt Chiefs 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 79.46 PREV UNIFORMS510-0995 Fire Marshall 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 32.38 PREV UNIFORMS510-1524 Fire Inspector 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 17.67 OPS UNIFORMS510-1539 Admin BC 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 38.26 UNIFORMS510-1884 Fire Chief 001.000.510.522.100.240.00 26.49 OPS UNIFORMS510-2341 Asst. Chief 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 29.43 Total :223.69 94900 3/15/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING FEBRUARY 2007 INV# FEBRUARY 2007 EDMONDS PD DRY CLEANING FEBRUARY 2007 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 903.99 Total :903.99 94901 3/15/2007 005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE CRETIN0310 GYM MONITOR 16Page: Packet Page 85 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94901 3/15/2007 (Continued)005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR FOR DANCE 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 48.00 Total :48.00 94902 3/15/2007 005965 CUES INC 264130 SEWER DEPT CAMERA REPAIR SEWER DEPT CAMERA REPAIR 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 462.47 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 104.81 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 27.07 SEWER DEPT - RETURNED SCREWSCM13955 SEWER DEPT - RETURNED SCREWS 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -1.21 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -0.11 SEWER DEPT - RETURNED CABLECM13956 SEWER DEPT - RETURNED CABLE 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -47.65 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -4.25 Total :541.13 94903 3/15/2007 066802 CURRAN, JESSE CURRAN0314 BOOT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT FOR WORK BOOTS PER 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 164.00 Total :164.00 94904 3/15/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 134562 OPS COMMUNICATIONS modem calibrate & program 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 65.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 5.60 Total :70.60 17Page: Packet Page 86 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94905 3/15/2007 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING feb 2007 STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOL State Share of Concealed Pistol 001.000.000.237.190.000.00 273.00 Total :273.00 94906 3/15/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 0366 JIM NORDQUIST JIM NORDQUIST/OPERATOR CERTF. 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 30.00 Total :30.00 94907 3/15/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2007-WAR045513 PERMIT WAR045513 STORMWATER STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FEE FOR 411.000.652.542.400.490.00 7,940.88 Total :7,940.88 94908 3/15/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY VL07208001 8TH AND WALNUT PETROLEUM CLEANUP 8TH AND WALNUT PETROLEUM CLEANUP 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 481.30 Total :481.30 94909 3/15/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201568929 FAC MAINT - M & LG GLOVES, CLIP BOARDS FAC MAINT - M & LG GLOVES, CLIP BOARDS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 120.60 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.13 LIBRARY - WASTEBASKETS201569505 LIBRARY - WASTEBASKETS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 52.80 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.44 FAC MAINT - SEAT COVERS, LINERS201570511 FAC MAINT - SEAT COVERS, LINERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.35 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.64 Total :234.96 18Page: Packet Page 87 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94910 3/15/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 16-1-3755 INV#16-1-3755 CUST#23104-000 EDMONDS ADMIN FEE - FED SURPLUS PROG. 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 100.00 Total :100.00 94911 3/15/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2730 MINUTE TAKING 3/6/07 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 266.00 Total :266.00 94912 3/15/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 77377 SUPPLIES OIL 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 25.08 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.23 SUPPLIES77737 TUBING/SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.97 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.42 Total :44.70 94913 3/15/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 77572 OPS SUPPLIES Hlgn Lamps 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 21.06 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1.87 Total :22.93 94914 3/15/2007 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 94596 INV#94596 CLIENT#5118 EDMONDS AC SPAY IMPOUND #6689 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 109.75 SPAY IMPOUND #6804 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 97.50 SPAY FELINE IMPOUND #6719 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 86.00 19Page: Packet Page 88 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :293.25949143/15/2007 069878 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 94915 3/15/2007 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES ENGLAND7627 SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE #7627 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 450.00 SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE #7628 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 450.00 SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE #7629 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 480.00 SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE #7630 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 120.00 Total :1,500.00 94916 3/15/2007 071548 FALCON RIDGE HOMES LLC 125945&6 PARTIAL REFUND ON HYDRANT METER DUE TO PARTIAL REFUND ON HYDRANT METER DUE TO 411.000.000.245.110.000.00 853.73 Total :853.73 94917 3/15/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0077906 WATER - KUPFERIE FLUSH HYDRANT WATER - KUPFERIE FLUSH HYDRANT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 690.00 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 85.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 68.20 WATER DEPT - TORX, TAMPER SCREW FOR0083025 WATER DEPT - TORX, TAMPER SCREW FOR 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 91.40 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.32 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.78 20Page: Packet Page 89 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94917 3/15/2007 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WATER - DUCTILE IRON READER LIDS0083317 WATER - DUCTILE IRON READER LIDS 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 511.38 14X16X12 DUPLEX METER BOX 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 676.14 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 105.69 WATER - 2" 3-PC THREADED UNION0083930 WATER - 2" 3-PC THREADED UNION 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 70.98 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.25 Total :2,321.14 94918 3/15/2007 069940 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SVC 900JJM0702 INV#900JJM0702 EDMONDS PD CREDIT CHECKS 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 26.12 Total :26.12 94919 3/15/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 92359 Check mailing fee - section 132 plan Check mailing fee - section 132 plan 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 1.80 Total :1.80 94920 3/15/2007 071562 FORMA 4206 PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM DESIGN SERVICES DEVLPMNT OF PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM DESIGN 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,800.00 Total :1,800.00 94921 3/15/2007 071311 FORMS AND FILING INC 99455A INV#99455A CUST#8151 EDMONDS PD 21Page: Packet Page 90 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94921 3/15/2007 (Continued)071311 FORMS AND FILING INC COLOR TAB NUMBER LABELS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 39.00 COLOR TAB NUMBER SERIES LABELS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 52.00 RED "J" LABELS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 8.90 Freight 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 5.42 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 9.38 Total :114.70 94922 3/15/2007 010660 FOSTER, MARLO 33 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,901.33 Total :1,901.33 94923 3/15/2007 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY 2070830-01 EDMCIT BEARILNGS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 35.12 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.09 Total :38.21 94924 3/15/2007 071560 GREAVES COMPANY INC 071357 69419 C-248 SAND UNLOADING VALVE 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 3,955.00 Freight 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 69.84 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 354.18 Total :4,379.02 94925 3/15/2007 012555 H & L SPORTING GOODS 91-1423 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES 22Page: Packet Page 91 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94925 3/15/2007 (Continued)012555 H & L SPORTING GOODS SCOREBOOKS AND LINE UP CARDS FOR SPRING 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 840.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 72.24 Total :912.24 94926 3/15/2007 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 123164 UNIT 124 POL - RIVETS UNIT 124 POL - RIVETS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.08 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.54 Total :6.62 94927 3/15/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 2126-79 Medical evaluation Medical evaluation 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 615.00 Total :615.00 94928 3/15/2007 064129 HENRY'S PLANT FARM 55422 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES FLOWERS,PLANTS FOR FLOWER PROGRAM 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 437.68 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 38.95 Total :476.63 94929 3/15/2007 069164 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 41913017 HP NOTEBOOK NC6320 PER QUOTE 1192449 HP Notebook nc6320 per quote 1192449330-00333 001.000.510.522.400.350.00 1,491.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.400.350.00 132.70 Total :1,623.70 94930 3/15/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3583914 6035322500959949 23Page: Packet Page 92 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94930 3/15/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES GAS CONNECTOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.98 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.05 60353225009599494044593 PLYWOOD 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 29.99 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.64 60353225009599496252403 GAS CONNECTOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 -18.47 603532250095994974728 BRUSHES/FIRE CAULK 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 47.73 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.20 60353225009599498066437 GAS CONNECTOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 25.95 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.28 60353225009599499034235 PAINT SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.94 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.87 Total :118.16 94931 3/15/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3043050 6035322501434934 drywall & bit 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 37.91 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 3.34 24Page: Packet Page 93 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94931 3/15/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 60353225014349346031690 hinges & 7/16 OSB 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 89.68 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 7.89 Total :138.82 94932 3/15/2007 013905 HOUSLER, DAN MARCH 07 BOC CLASS MILEAGE FOR JAN - MAR 07 BOC CLASS MILEAGE FOR JAN - MAR 07 001.000.651.519.920.430.00 81.48 Total :81.48 94933 3/15/2007 062899 HUFF, ARIELE HUFF7544 POETRY CLASS EXPLORING POETRY #7544 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 126.00 Total :126.00 94934 3/15/2007 071380 ICHIMURA-HAYASHI, ITSUKO HAYASHI7917 ORIGAMI CLASS ORIGAMI #7917 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 15.60 Total :15.60 94935 3/15/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72600184 CANON IMAGE RUNNER 9070 LEASE Canon Image Runner 9070 Lease~250-00139 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 918.90 Total :918.90 94936 3/15/2007 061546 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY 700695 SEWER INVENTORY - S-ELECTLS-00-045 SEWER INVENTORY - S-ELECTLS-00-045 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 213.45 Freight 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 7.70 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 19.68 25Page: Packet Page 94 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94936 3/15/2007 (Continued)061546 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY SEWER - TELEM ST 2 - MONITOR RELAY700699 SEWER - TELEM ST 2 - MONITOR RELAY 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 129.30 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.51 Total :381.64 94937 3/15/2007 014430 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC CO INC 17084 MOTOR MOTOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 420.65 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 14.25 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 37.40 Total :472.30 94938 3/15/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE 435841 SHOP - END CUTTER SHOP - END CUTTER 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 23.73 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 2.11 SHOP - WIPER BLADES, 6V BATTERIES435978 SHOP - WIPER BLADES, 6V BATTERIES 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 120.50 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 6.85 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 11.33 Total :164.52 94939 3/15/2007 068737 JOHNSON ROBERTS & ASSOC 106475 INV#106475 EDMONDS PD PRE-OFFER PHQ REPORT - MOSS 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 15.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 0.87 26Page: Packet Page 95 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :15.87949393/15/2007 068737 068737 JOHNSON ROBERTS & ASSOC 94940 3/15/2007 066913 KDL HARDWARE SUPPLY INC 320637 FAC MAINT - KEYIN SC KNOB CYL FAC MAINT - KEYIN SC KNOB CYL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 163.02 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.57 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.75 Total :182.34 94941 3/15/2007 071556 LENEKE, EDITH LENEKE0306 REFUND REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 250.00 Total :250.00 94942 3/15/2007 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 121831 UNIT 332 - SNOW TIRES AND STUDS UNIT 332 - SNOW TIRES AND STUDS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 190.82 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.98 UNIT 67 - TIRE122558 UNIT 67 - TIRE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 125.41 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.16 Total :347.37 94943 3/15/2007 018900 LYNNWOOD AUTO ELECTRIC 69627 UNIT 53- STARTER UNIT 53- STARTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 175.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.58 27Page: Packet Page 96 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94943 3/15/2007 (Continued)018900 LYNNWOOD AUTO ELECTRIC UNIT 55 - MOD ALTERNATOR69645 UNIT 55 - MOD ALTERNATOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 98.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.72 Total :297.30 94944 3/15/2007 060246 M & M BALLOON CO T-4509 Helium tank rental - 11/06, 12/06, Helium tank rental - 11/06, 12/06, 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 60.00 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 5.34 Total :65.34 94945 3/15/2007 071555 MATHEWS, ALYSSA 6657 ANIMAL IMPOUND 6657 - SPAY/NEUTER REF. SPAY/NEUTER REFUND 001.000.000.343.930.000.00 50.00 Total :50.00 94946 3/15/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 60401467 123106800 MULTIMETER 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 93.07 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.04 12310680060464764 PIPE FITTINGS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 100.61 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.15 Total :204.87 94947 3/15/2007 071557 MOODY, DONALD 43614 MOODY REFUND RE: BLDG. PERMIT NO. MOODY REFUND RE: BLDG. PERMIT NO. 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 4.50 Total :4.50 28Page: Packet Page 97 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94948 3/15/2007 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0193436-IN SEWER DEPT - WORK JEANS SEWER DEPT - WORK JEANS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 120.60 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 10.61 Total :131.21 94949 3/15/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1306562.002 CABLES CABLES 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 48.60 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 16.10 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.56 Total :70.26 94950 3/15/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0436651 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 231.18 Total :231.18 94951 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 558125 Office Supplies - L. Carl Office Supplies - L. Carl 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 50.97 King County Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 2.48 Office Supplies - HR568555 Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 34.80 Service charge 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 3.06 Total :92.31 94952 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 543141 Extension cord Utility knife & Blades 29Page: Packet Page 98 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94952 3/15/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Extension cord Utility knife & Blades 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 24.33 Computer Duster 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 22.30 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 2.15 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.96 Extension Cord544490 Extension Cord 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 16.08 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1.42 Printer toner calulator ribbons tabs560420 Printer toner calulator ribbons tabs 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 207.31 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 18.25 Total :293.80 94953 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 449074 520437 CDR'S/DISPENSER/INK CART/BATTERIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 95.27 King County Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 8.38 Total :103.65 94954 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 287553 OFFICE UPPLIES office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 249.44 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 21.95 30Page: Packet Page 99 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94954 3/15/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES377578 Envelopes returned Org Inv287553 2/7/07 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 -113.46 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 -9.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES377618 Tyvek envelopes 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 151.68 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 13.35 Total :312.98 94955 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 359978 PW ADMIN - STAMPS, WIPES, LEGAL PW ADMIN - STAMPS, WIPES, LEGAL 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 526.01 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 46.28 PW ADMIN - LEGAL FILE FOLDERS405180 PW ADMIN - LEGAL FILE FOLDERS 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 34.80 SVC FEE 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 3.06 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - HIGHLITERS,489414 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - HIGHLITERS, 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 26.03 SVC FEE 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 2.28 Total :640.46 94956 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 262932 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES DS DEPT. 31Page: Packet Page 100 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94956 3/15/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES DS DEPT. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 7.15 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 0.63 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES.399134 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 141.22 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 12.42 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES.453898 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 241.13 King County Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 21.21 Total :423.76 94957 3/15/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 404396 INV#404396 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD BOISE X-9 LEGAL SIZE PAPER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 16.96 STAPLES, PENS, FOLDERS, BINDERS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 53.71 CARTON OF TISSUES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 48.33 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.48 32Page: Packet Page 101 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94957 3/15/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC INV#585326 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD585326 DRY ERASE BOARD SUPPLIES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.44 RULER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.88 CASSETTE TAPES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.40 HP GLOSSY PHOTO PAPER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 25.67 HP TONER FOR SGT. SMITH 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 57.39 PENS, POST-ITS, NOTEBOOKS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 60.06 AA NiMH BATTERIES 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 16.99 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.58 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 5.05 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 1.49 Total :316.43 94958 3/15/2007 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER Dec 2006 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL 33Page: Packet Page 102 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94958 3/15/2007 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER Emergency Medical Services & Trauma 001.000.000.237.120.000.00 750.36 PSEA 1, 2,3 Account 001.000.000.237.130.000.00 17,109.60 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.000.237.150.000.00 83.00 State Patrol Death Investigations 001.000.000.237.170.000.00 669.88 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.000.237.180.000.00 1,909.63 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.000.237.200.000.00 163.14 Total :20,685.61 94959 3/15/2007 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 656899 02/07 LEGAL FEES 02/07 Leagl Fees 001.000.360.515.100.410.00 12,136.46 02/07 RETAINER FEES656905 02/07 Retainer Fees 001.000.360.515.100.410.00 12,400.50 Total :24,536.96 94960 3/15/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 000292 0 WATER FOR L/S #13 WATER FOR L/S #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 23.60 FIRE STATION #20002140 0 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 100.37 Total :123.97 94961 3/15/2007 066833 PACIFIC NW PUBLIC FLEET 7118 2007 MEMBER RENEWAL FOR ~ 2007 MEMBER RENEWAL FOR ~ 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 100.00 Total :100.00 34Page: Packet Page 103 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94962 3/15/2007 071558 PETERSON, NELLIE 4-40190 RE: # 07-4070-SV UTILITY REFUND # 07-4070-SV Utility Refund/ 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 99.63 Total :99.63 94963 3/15/2007 027775 PETRELLA, MARC 510-0326 TRAINING TRAVEL mileage reimbrsmt 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 129.98 Total :129.98 94964 3/15/2007 007800 PETTY CASH tc petty parking reimb-snook 35Page: Packet Page 104 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94964 3/15/2007 (Continued)007800 PETTY CASH parking reimb-snook 001.000.620.524.100.430.00 5.00 sno cnty records document fee 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00 scfoa meeting-chase 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00 scfoa meeting-mcconnell&monroe 001.000.310.514.230.490.00 23.00 scfoa mileage reimb-mcconnell 001.000.310.514.230.430.00 10.67 cookies for mayors neighborhood meeting 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 9.48 scfoa-meeting-Hynd 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00 mileage reimb-Carl 001.000.210.513.100.430.00 81.00 supplies for lfd investigation 001.000.510.522.300.310.00 42.47 smp workshop supplies 001.000.620.558.600.310.00 96.23 cookies mayors neighborhood meeting 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 5.49 paper for 2006 comp plans 001.000.620.558.600.310.00 23.48 monthly sno cnty mayors lunch 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 18.00 coffee for 2nd floor 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 36.74 cookies for mayors neighborhood meeting 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 14.98 can opener-bldg dept 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 11.92 Total :408.46 94965 3/15/2007 070257 POSTINI INC 290946 INTERNET ANTI-VIRUS & SPAM MAINT FEE 36Page: Packet Page 105 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94965 3/15/2007 (Continued)070257 POSTINI INC 03/07 Internet Anti-Virus & Spam Maint 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 475.83 Total :475.83 94966 3/15/2007 071184 PROCOM 207-1158 FEB 07 PROF SERVICE FIBER OPTIC PROJECT Feb 07 Prof Service Fiber Optic Project 001.000.390.528.200.410.00 1,187.50 Sales Tax 001.000.390.528.200.410.00 105.69 Total :1,293.19 94967 3/15/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL 24 hour alarm monitoring-CH~ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00 Total :35.00 94968 3/15/2007 071559 PUBLIC SAFETY SELECTION PC 863 Employment screening services Employment screening services 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 350.00 Total :350.00 94969 3/15/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 5322323139 Fire Station # 16 Fire Station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,374.95 Total :1,374.95 94970 3/15/2007 030695 PUMPTECH INC 26144 SEWER INVENTORY - 3HP GRINDER PUMP SEWER INVENTORY - 3HP GRINDER PUMP 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 3,111.00 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.150.310.00 273.77 Total :3,384.77 94971 3/15/2007 065579 QUIKSIGN 55277 S-06-146 SIGN INSTALLATION 37Page: Packet Page 106 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94971 3/15/2007 (Continued)065579 QUIKSIGN S-06-146 SIGN INSTALLATION 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 156.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 13.73 Total :169.73 94972 3/15/2007 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B FLOW METERING STATIONS FLOW METERING STATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.80 Total :137.80 94973 3/15/2007 071563 SEATTLE CHINESE POST INC 9498724 Transportation Engineer, #07-07 ad Transportation Engineer, #07-07 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 40.00 Total :40.00 94974 3/15/2007 036070 SHANNON TOWING INC 188624 INV#188624 EDMONDS PD CASE 07-0975 TOW 2007 MITSUBISHI 660NBY 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 124.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 11.03 Total :135.03 94975 3/15/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2460018753 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 53.11 PARK GAZEBO3660016779 PARK GAZEBO 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74 CITY PARK SOUTH RESTROOMS & COVERED5030011778 CITY PARK SOUTH RESTROOMS & COVERED 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 302.93 Total :385.78 94976 3/15/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 750007487 620-001-500-3 38Page: Packet Page 107 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94976 3/15/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 6.33 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.38 Total :6.71 94977 3/15/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060018765 LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 73.07 SIGNAL LIGHT2340018510 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 75.30 SIGNAL LIGHT3180012308 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 58.93 DECORATIVE LIGHTS 115 2ND AVE S3260494996 deocrative lighting 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 42.30 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3380016430 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74 LIFT STATION #143980029445 LIFT STATION #14 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 29.74 FIRE STATION #204650022645 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 660.61 SIGNAL LIGHT5240017631 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 41.89 STREET LIGHT5370016262 STREET LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 29.74 39Page: Packet Page 108 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94977 3/15/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 LIFT STATION #15720013258 LIFT STATION #1 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 1,077.04 STREET LIGHTING6000013000 STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 8,422.55 STREET LIGHTING6100013009 STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,944.24 STREET LIGHTING6100013306 STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 170.07 STREET LIGHTING6200013008 STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,814.76 Total :20,469.98 94978 3/15/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 34013 INV#34013 EDMONDS PD CRIME PREV. ADDRESS STAMP 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 13.88 NEW DIE & INK PAD FOR CP STAMP 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 7.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 1.86 Total :22.74 94979 3/15/2007 069358 SNO-KING STUMP GRINDERS 3534 STUMP GRINDING STUMP GRINDING @ CITY PARK, MAPLEWOOD 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,125.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 100.13 Total :1,225.13 94980 3/15/2007 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER dec 2006 Crime Victims 40Page: Packet Page 109 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94980 3/15/2007 (Continued)070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER Crime Victims 001.000.000.237.140.000.00 576.40 Total :576.40 94981 3/15/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40 Total :24.78 94982 3/15/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03585 garbage & recycle for FAC garbage & recycle for FAC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.90 Total :556.90 94983 3/15/2007 070684 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 133431 53769 C-161 SCREENINGS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 646.80 Total :646.80 94984 3/15/2007 031060 STEARNS FINANCIAL SERVICES 7049031-IN RADIX MONTHLY MAINT ARPIL 07 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT ARPIL 07 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 155.40 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 13.83 Total :169.23 94985 3/15/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 903517 FS 20 - ELELCTRICAL SUPPLIES FS 20 - ELELCTRICAL SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 103.80 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.24 41Page: Packet Page 110 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94985 3/15/2007 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY CITY HALL - ELECT SUPPLIES924664 CITY HALL - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 208.26 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.54 OLD PW - ELECT SUPPLIES929344 OLD PW - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.93 FS 16 - ELECT SUPPLIES929345 FS 16 - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.10 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.70 Total :396.51 94986 3/15/2007 068995 SUNSHINE FILTERS OF PINELLAS 085803 FILTERS FILTERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 198.29 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 16.74 Total :215.03 94987 3/15/2007 070578 TEL WEST COMMUNICATIONS 800168 C/A 20044 PR1-1 City Phone Service 2/21-3/21/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 835.40 Total :835.40 94988 3/15/2007 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA 000494 INTERNET ACCESS FOR CEMETERY CEMETERY INTERNET ACCESS 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 17.95 Total :17.95 94989 3/15/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1483514 NEWSPAPER AD 42Page: Packet Page 111 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94989 3/15/2007 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY Banner Sites Hearing 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 34.56 NEWSPAPER AD1483616 Landslide Hazard Area Hearing 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 40.32 NEWSPAPER AD1483619 CIP Hearing 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 31.68 NEWSPAPER ADSC/A 101415 02/07 Council & Planning Agendas 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,406.71 Total :1,513.27 94990 3/15/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1477189 EMERALD HILLS/CU-07-8 LEGAL ADVERTISING. EMERALD HILLS/CU-07-8 LEGAL ADVERTISING. 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 18.72 REICHLER/CU-06-153 LEGAL ADVERTISING.1479506 REICHLER/CU-06-153 LEGAL ADVERTISING. 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 19.44 SHAPIRO/R-06-95 LEGAL ADVERTISING1482318 SHAPIRO/R-06-95 LEGAL ADVERTISING 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 28.08 REICHLER/ADB-06-154 LEGAL ADVERTISING.1482954 REICHLER/ADB-06-154 LEGAL ADVERTISING. 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 19.44 CRISPENO/S-06-146 LEGAL ADVERTISING.1483647 CRISPENO/S-06-146 LEGAL ADVERTISING. 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 22.32 Total :108.00 94991 3/15/2007 071561 TRUCKERS EXPRESS INC 1080331-00 C-248 SAND DELIVERY C-248 SAND DELIVERY 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 550.00 Total :550.00 43Page: Packet Page 112 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94992 3/15/2007 063596 UNIMIN CORPORATION 2467054 070-0010868 C 248 SAND 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 2,649.20 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 206.72 Total :2,855.92 94993 3/15/2007 071549 UNIVAR USA INC KT-012790 SEWER DEPT - COPPER SULFATE SEWER DEPT - COPPER SULFATE 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 102.00 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 8.98 Total :110.98 94994 3/15/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 47.70 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 47.05 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 59.51 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM425-776-5316 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 104.45 Total :258.71 94995 3/15/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 NW1-0060 03 0210 1079569413 10 BPS TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.02 03 0210 1099569419 02425 NW1-0155 TELEMENTRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 215.74 44Page: Packet Page 113 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94995 3/15/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 03 0210 1014522641 07425-771-5553 AUTO DIALER 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 62.09 Total :318.85 94996 3/15/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 33.82 LIFT STATION #1425-673-5978 Lift Station #1 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 47.37 FS # 16425-771-0158 FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 228.12 LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281 LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 42.70 CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829 CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 114.72 1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530 1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.30 Total :507.03 94997 3/15/2007 068265 VERIZON ONLINE 10633864 ACCT #8372119 Mar 07 City of Edmonds Internet 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 667.00 Total :667.00 94998 3/15/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 269992985-1 425-308-9867 cell phone-water watch 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 35.93 Total :35.93 94999 3/15/2007 068180 WA CITIZENS-RESOURCE CONSERV 2007 DUES MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR- S FISHER 45Page: Packet Page 114 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 94999 3/15/2007 (Continued)068180 WA CITIZENS-RESOURCE CONSERV MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR- S FISHER 411.000.654.537.900.490.00 50.00 Total :50.00 95000 3/15/2007 064183 WA STATE LEOFF EDUCATION ASSOC 03/13/2007 LEOFF Education Ass. Conference 2007; LEOFF Education Ass. Conference 2007; 001.000.390.517.220.230.00 275.00 LEOFF Educ. Assn. Conference ; 5/8 -3/13/07 LEOFF Educ. Assn. Conference ; 5/8 - 001.000.390.517.220.230.00 275.00 Total :550.00 95001 3/15/2007 045515 WABO 12121 CODE BOOKS & TABS - BLDG. DEPT. CODE BOOKS & TABS - BLDG. DEPT. 001.000.620.524.100.310.00 177.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.310.00 14.87 Total :191.87 95002 3/15/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I06014890 INV#I06014890 EDMONDS PD BACKGROUND CHECKS 02/07 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 96.00 Total :96.00 95003 3/15/2007 065179 WSAPT TREASURER WSAPT2007 2007 MEMBERSHIP FOR MARIE HARRISON, 2007 MEMBERSHIP FOR MARIE HARRISON, 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 105.00 Total :105.00 Bank total :257,341.46152 Vouchers for bank code :front 257,341.46Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report152 46Page: Packet Page 115 of 433 03/15/2007 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 10:38:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 47Page: Packet Page 116 of 433 AM-875 2.D. Claims for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Linda Hynd, City Clerk's Office Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Frank Tsering Degotsang (amount undetermined), Roseann Wilson (amount undetermined), Mark and Sherri Johnson ($929.94), Richard and Kathleen Glassburn (amount undetermined), and Marilyn G. Walker ($87.04). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative Claims for Damages have been received from the following individuals: Tsering Degotsang 719 N.W. Market Street Seattle, WA. 98107 (Amount undetermined) Roseann Wilson 560 115th Avenue NW Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55433 (Amount undetermined) Mark and Sherri Johnson 9220 Cascade Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 ($929.94) Richard and Kathleen Glassburn 21911 98th Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 (Amount undetermined) Marilyn G. Walker 8024 181st Place SW Edmonds, WA 98026 ($87.04) Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Degotsang Claim for Damages Link: Wilson Claim for Damages Link: Johnson Claim for Damages Link: Glassburn Claim for Damages Link: Walker Claim for Damages Form Routing/Status Packet Page 117 of 433 Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 09:27 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 09:59 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 10:15 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 03/02/2007 04:35 PM Final Approval Date: 03/15/2007 Packet Page 118 of 433 Packet Page 119 of 433 Packet Page 120 of 433 Packet Page 121 of 433 Packet Page 122 of 433 Packet Page 123 of 433 Packet Page 124 of 433 Packet Page 125 of 433 Packet Page 126 of 433 Packet Page 127 of 433 Packet Page 128 of 433 Packet Page 129 of 433 Packet Page 130 of 433 Packet Page 131 of 433 Packet Page 132 of 433 Packet Page 133 of 433 Packet Page 134 of 433 Packet Page 135 of 433 Packet Page 136 of 433 Packet Page 137 of 433 Packet Page 138 of 433 Packet Page 139 of 433 AM-882 2.E. Liquor Control Board Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Linda Carl, Mayor's Office Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington State Liquor Control Board, January - March 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Please approve the attached list of businesses with one exception (below). Previous Council Action On the December 19, 2006 agenda, the agenda memo indicated five businesses that the City took exception to regarding the renewal of their liquor licenses due to not having valid business licenses. Since that time, two of the businesses (La Galleria and Candlelit Moments) have renewed their business licenses, and one business (Good Friends) has a new owner with a valid business license. The City has no further objection concerning those businesses. Two businesses (BCD Tofu House and Kero’s Food Market) have still not renewed their business license. Narrative The City Clerk’s Office, the Police Department, and the Mayor’s Office have reviewed the attached list of businesses and have no concerns with renewing the liquor licenses of these businesses, with the following exception: Mick Finsters, located at 24001 Highway 99, does not have a valid City of Edmonds business license. Mick Finsters and the WSLCB have been notified of the City’s objection to their liquor license application. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: WSLCB list Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/12/2007 04:39 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/13/2007 07:41 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/13/2007 11:28 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl Started On: 03/12/2007 03:31 PM Final Approval Date: 03/13/2007 Packet Page 140 of 433 Packet Page 141 of 433 Packet Page 142 of 433 Packet Page 143 of 433 Packet Page 144 of 433 AM-877 2.F. Meter A Rehabilitation Project Acceptance Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the Meter A Rehabilitation Project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the Meter A Rehabilitation Project. Previous Council Action On September 18, 2006, Council awarded a contract for the Meter A Rehabilitation Project to Interwest Construction, Inc. in the amount of $95,832. Narrative The Meter A Rehabilitation project was designed by CHS Engineers, Inc. and was inspected and accepted by City Staff. Project Budget $100,000 Meter A Project Cost (Interwest Construction) 95,832 Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 03/06/2007 03:38 PM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/06/2007 05:58 PM APRV 3 Public Works Noel Miller 03/06/2007 06:18 PM APRV 4 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/07/2007 08:21 AM APRV 5 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/12/2007 06:03 AM APRV 6 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/12/2007 08:27 AM APRV 7 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/12/2007 04:39 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 03/06/2007 02:29 PM Final Approval Date: 03/12/2007 Packet Page 145 of 433 AM-878 2.G. 2006 Citywide Storm Final Acceptance Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the 2006 Citywide Storm Improvements project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the 2006 Citywide Storm Improvements project. Previous Council Action On September 18, 2006, Council awarded a contract for the 2006 Citywide Storm Improvements project to Earthwork Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $219,683.99. On December 19, 2006, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Change Order No. 3 and appropriated an additional $40,183 for the project budget. Narrative The 2006 Citywide Storm Improvements project is now complete. The project was designed, inspected and accepted by City Staff. Project Budget........$302,435 Contractor (Earthwork Enterprises)........$273,339 Testing (HWA Geosciences)........$6,224 1% for Art........$2,197 Advertising........$337 Materials for work performed by Public Works........$19,311 Total Project Costs........$301,408 Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 03/08/2007 11:55 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/08/2007 01:05 PM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/12/2007 06:03 AM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/12/2007 08:27 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/12/2007 04:39 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 03/08/2007 11:09 AM Final Approval Date: 03/12/2007 Packet Page 146 of 433 AM-887 2.H. Surplus of Computer Monitors and Donation to Interconnection. Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Kathleen Junglov, Administrative Services Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee:Finance Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Surplus of computer monitors and donation to Interconnection. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Authorize surplusing of computer monitors and donation to Interconnection. Previous Council Action Finance Committee March 13, 2007. Narrative 45 Computer monitors were replaced this year with LCD flat screen monitors. The surplus CRT monitors are being donated to a company called Interconnection which finds various uses for surplus computer equipment. Donating these monitors to Interconnection will insure that they will be given to a non-profit organization for a good cause. This also means these useful monitors will not end up in a landfill. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Dan Clements 03/15/2007 01:00 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 04:39 PM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 06:01 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 07:08 AM APRV Form Started By: Kathleen Junglov Started On: 03/15/2007 07:29 AM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 147 of 433 AM-883 2.I. Purchase Vehicle for the Fire Department Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Kim Karas, Public Works Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:Consent Department:Public Works Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subject Title Authorization for Public Works to Purchase one (1) new 2007 Chevrolet 2500 4x4 Suburban for the Fire Department in the amount of $34,616.21 including Washington State sales tax. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Public Works Fleet Manager to purchase one (1) Chevrolet 2500 4x4 Suburban from Seaview Chevrolet for the total amount of $34,616.21 including Washington State sales tax. Previous Council Action Narrative The Fire Department's Unit #482, a 2000 Ford Expedition is scheduled to be replaced in the 2007 Fiscal year, utilizing the 511 B-Fund replacement monies. The Fleet Division has received five (5) written quotes from local area car dealerships. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2007 Revenue: $55,000.00 Expenditure: $34,616.21 Fiscal Impact: $10,000 Salvage Value and the 511 Replacement B-Fund Attachments Link: FD Suburban Quote #1 Link: FD Suburban Quote #2 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 11:46 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 06:01 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 07:08 AM APRV Form Started By: Kim Karas Started On: 03/13/2007 12:59 PM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 148 of 433 Packet Page 149 of 433 Packet Page 150 of 433 AM-884 3. Historical Report on Term Limits Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Council President Pritchard Olson Time:15 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Historical Report on Term Limits Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action At the August 18, 1998 Edmonds City Council Meeting the Council reviewed the term limit ordinance. At that meeting, the Council voted 6 to 1 to adopt Ordinance No. 3223 removing the limitation on the number of years a Mayor serves. Narrative At the conclusion of the March 6, 2007 Edmonds City Council Meeting, Councilmember Mauri Moore, during the Council Comments portion of the meeting, broached the subject of term limits for the Edmonds City Mayor. City Attorney Scott Snyder will make a presentation on the history of the term limits ordinance and the relevant attorney general opinion and court cases. Attached are copies of a Memorandum from Mr. Snyder dated March 15, 2007 along with Exhibits A through E. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 8-18-98 Minutes re: Term Limits Link: City Attorney Memo and Exhibits A & B Link: City Attorney Memo Exhibits C & D Link: City Attorney Memo Exhibit D continued Link: City Attorney Memo Exhibit E Link: City Attorney Memo Exhibit E continued Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 08:33 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 09:59 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 10:15 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 03/14/2007 08:35 AM Final Approval Date: 03/15/2007 Packet Page 151 of 433 Packet Page 152 of 433 Packet Page 153 of 433 Packet Page 154 of 433 Packet Page 155 of 433 Packet Page 156 of 433 Packet Page 157 of 433 Packet Page 158 of 433 Packet Page 159 of 433 Packet Page 160 of 433 Packet Page 161 of 433 Packet Page 162 of 433 Packet Page 163 of 433 Packet Page 164 of 433 Packet Page 165 of 433 Packet Page 166 of 433 Packet Page 167 of 433 Packet Page 168 of 433 Packet Page 169 of 433 Packet Page 170 of 433 Packet Page 171 of 433 Packet Page 172 of 433 Packet Page 173 of 433 Packet Page 174 of 433 Packet Page 175 of 433 Packet Page 176 of 433 Packet Page 177 of 433 Packet Page 178 of 433 Packet Page 179 of 433 Packet Page 180 of 433 Packet Page 181 of 433 Packet Page 182 of 433 Packet Page 183 of 433 Packet Page 184 of 433 Packet Page 185 of 433 Packet Page 186 of 433 Packet Page 187 of 433 Packet Page 188 of 433 Packet Page 189 of 433 Packet Page 190 of 433 Packet Page 191 of 433 Packet Page 192 of 433 Packet Page 193 of 433 Packet Page 194 of 433 Packet Page 195 of 433 Packet Page 196 of 433 Packet Page 197 of 433 Packet Page 198 of 433 Packet Page 199 of 433 Packet Page 200 of 433 Packet Page 201 of 433 Packet Page 202 of 433 Packet Page 203 of 433 Packet Page 204 of 433 Packet Page 205 of 433 Packet Page 206 of 433 Packet Page 207 of 433 Packet Page 208 of 433 Packet Page 209 of 433 Packet Page 210 of 433 Packet Page 211 of 433 Packet Page 212 of 433 Packet Page 213 of 433 Packet Page 214 of 433 Packet Page 215 of 433 Packet Page 216 of 433 Packet Page 217 of 433 Packet Page 218 of 433 Packet Page 219 of 433 Packet Page 220 of 433 Packet Page 221 of 433 Packet Page 222 of 433 Packet Page 223 of 433 Packet Page 224 of 433 Packet Page 225 of 433 Packet Page 226 of 433 Packet Page 227 of 433 Packet Page 228 of 433 Packet Page 229 of 433 Packet Page 230 of 433 Packet Page 231 of 433 Packet Page 232 of 433 Packet Page 233 of 433 Packet Page 234 of 433 Packet Page 235 of 433 Packet Page 236 of 433 Packet Page 237 of 433 Packet Page 238 of 433 Packet Page 239 of 433 Packet Page 240 of 433 Packet Page 241 of 433 Packet Page 242 of 433 Packet Page 243 of 433 Packet Page 244 of 433 Packet Page 245 of 433 Packet Page 246 of 433 Packet Page 247 of 433 Packet Page 248 of 433 Packet Page 249 of 433 Packet Page 250 of 433 Packet Page 251 of 433 Packet Page 252 of 433 Packet Page 253 of 433 Packet Page 254 of 433 Packet Page 255 of 433 Packet Page 256 of 433 Packet Page 257 of 433 Packet Page 258 of 433 Packet Page 259 of 433 Packet Page 260 of 433 Packet Page 261 of 433 Packet Page 262 of 433 Packet Page 263 of 433 Packet Page 264 of 433 Packet Page 265 of 433 Packet Page 266 of 433 Packet Page 267 of 433 Packet Page 268 of 433 Packet Page 269 of 433 Packet Page 270 of 433 Packet Page 271 of 433 Packet Page 272 of 433 Packet Page 273 of 433 Packet Page 274 of 433 Packet Page 275 of 433 Packet Page 276 of 433 Packet Page 277 of 433 Packet Page 278 of 433 Packet Page 279 of 433 Packet Page 280 of 433 Packet Page 281 of 433 Packet Page 282 of 433 Packet Page 283 of 433 Packet Page 284 of 433 Packet Page 285 of 433 Packet Page 286 of 433 Packet Page 287 of 433 Packet Page 288 of 433 Packet Page 289 of 433 Packet Page 290 of 433 Packet Page 291 of 433 Packet Page 292 of 433 Packet Page 293 of 433 Packet Page 294 of 433 Packet Page 295 of 433 Packet Page 296 of 433 Packet Page 297 of 433 Packet Page 298 of 433 Packet Page 299 of 433 Packet Page 300 of 433 Packet Page 301 of 433 Packet Page 302 of 433 Packet Page 303 of 433 Packet Page 304 of 433 Packet Page 305 of 433 Packet Page 306 of 433 Packet Page 307 of 433 Packet Page 308 of 433 Packet Page 309 of 433 Packet Page 310 of 433 Packet Page 311 of 433 Packet Page 312 of 433 Packet Page 313 of 433 Packet Page 314 of 433 Packet Page 315 of 433 Packet Page 316 of 433 Packet Page 317 of 433 Packet Page 318 of 433 Packet Page 319 of 433 Packet Page 320 of 433 Packet Page 321 of 433 Packet Page 322 of 433 Packet Page 323 of 433 Packet Page 324 of 433 Packet Page 325 of 433 Packet Page 326 of 433 Packet Page 327 of 433 Packet Page 328 of 433 AM-885 4. Community Event Banner Sites on City-owned Property Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Frances Chapin, Parks and Recreation Submitted For:Brian McIntosh Time:10 Minutes Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Action Review Committee:Community/Development Services Action:Recommend Review by Full Council Agenda Memo Subject Title Public Hearing regarding a Sign Code amendment to clarify language addressing community event banner sites on City-owned property. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Recommend proposed Sign Code amendment Ordinance be approved by City Council. Previous Council Action CSDS Committee directed staff to have amendment developed on November 14, 2006. Narrative For several years the community has expressed interest in having a third location to publicize community events in addition to the sites on Caspers and on 5th Avenue S where community event banners are displayed. The need for additional sites is included in both the Community Cultural Plan and the Streetscape Plan elements of the City Comprehensive Plan. Staff has now identified a suitable new site for installing poles for pole mounted community event banners on the Public Works property to the north side of 212th Street. However, installation has been delayed because the current Sign Code language does not address this special situation where the poles are located on City property. The issue was brought to the City Council CSDS Committee on November 14, 2006 where the recommended action was to direct staff to pursue developing a code amendment to allow the construction of the proposed sign site. On January 24, 2007 the Planning Board reviewed the proposed Ordinance amending the language and held a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance on February 14, 2007 where it was recommended to City Council. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 08:22 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 09:59 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 10:15 AM APRV Form Started By: Frances Chapin Started On: 03/14/2007 03:27 PM Final Approval Date: 03/15/2007 Packet Page 329 of 433 0006.900000 JZL/ 12/05/06 1/06/07 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 20.60 ECDC SIGN CODE; REVISING CURRENT DEFINITIONS FOR “GOVERNMENTAL SIGN”, “POLE SIGN”, AND “PORTABLE SIGN”; ADDING A NEW DEFINITION FOR “COMMUNITY EVENT BANNER” AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS THEREFORE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds regulates signs through the Sign Code codified at Chapter 20.60 ECDC for the purpose of promoting traffic safety and community aesthetics; and WHEREAS, community event banners effectively inform City residents about local festivals, carnivals, fairs, recreational contests and other nonprofit, charitable or City- sponsored events that are integral to the Edmonds community; and WHEREAS, community event banners are consistent with the underlying purposes of Chapter 20.60 ECDC by advancing community aesthetics; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: {JZL647340.DOC;2/00006.900000/} - 1 - Packet Page 330 of 433 Section 1. Amendment of ECDC 20.60.005. Section 20.60.005 of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to provide for revised definitions of “Governmental Sign”, “Portable Sign” and “Pole Sign”, and to establish a new definition for “Community Event Banner” as follows: 20.60.005 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: . . . . “Community event banner” is a noncommercial sign composed of cloth, fabric, canvas or similarly flexible material that promotes a temporary community event endorsed, operated or sponsored wholly or in part by a local public entity the jurisdiction of which includes the City of Edmonds. Community events are nonprofit, governmental or charitable festivals, contests, programs, fairs, carnivals or recreational contests conducted within the City. . . . . “Governmental sign” is a sign owned, operated or sponsored by a governmental entity, and which promotes the public health, safety or welfare. Governmental signs include, but are not limited to, traffic signs, directional and informational signs for public facilities, publicly sponsored warning or hazard signs, and community event banners displayed by a governmental entity on public property. . . . . “Pole signs” are freestanding signs where the structural support for the sign is a pole(s). Pole signs may include community event banners where the banner is supported by at least two poles that are permanently attached to the ground (“pole- mounted community event banners”). . . . . “Portable sign" is any sign that is readily capable of being moved or removed, whether attached or affixed to the ground or any structure that is typically intended for temporary display. Portable signs include, but are not limited to: {JZL647340.DOC;2/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 331 of 433 1. Signs designed and constructed with a chassis or support with or without wheels; 2. Menu and "sandwich" board signs; 3. "A" and "T" frame signs; 4. Wooden, metal, or plastic "stake" or "yard" signs; 5. Posters or banners affixed to windows, railings, overhangs, trees, hedges, or other structures or vegetation, except for pole-mounted community event banners; 6. Signs mounted upon vehicles parked and visible from the public right-of-way, except signs identifying the related business when the vehicle is being used in the normal day- to-day operation of the business, and except for signs advertising for sale the vehicle upon which the sign is mounted; 7. Searchlights; 8. Inflatables. Section 2. Amendment of ECDC 20.60.020. Subsection 20.60.020(B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to provide in its entirety as follows: 20.60.020 General regulations for permanent signs. . . . . B. Except for pole-mounted community event banners, no sign or any part of a sign may be designed or constructed to be moving by any means and shall not contain items such as banners, ribbons, streamers and spinners. Signs with type that is movable to change the message (reader boards) are allowed. . . . . {JZL647340.DOC;2/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 332 of 433 Section 3. Amendment of ECDC 20.60.045. Subsection 20.60.045(E) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to provide in its entirety as follows: 20.60.045 Freestanding sign — Regulations. . . . . E. Location. Freestanding signs shall be located as close as possible to the center of the street frontage on which they are located. Except for pole-mounted community event banners, freestanding signs may not be located on public property. Sites on a corner of two public streets may have one sign on the corner instead of a sign for each frontage. . . . . Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Transmittal to CTED. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the City Planner is directed to transmit a copy of this ordinance to the Washington Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development as required by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON {JZL647340.DOC;2/00006.900000/} - 4 - Packet Page 333 of 433 ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {JZL647340.DOC;2/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Page 334 of 433 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2006, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 20.60 ECDC SIGN CODE; REVISING CURRENT DEFINITIONS FOR “GOVERNMENTAL SIGN”, “POLE SIGN”, AND “PORTABLE SIGN”; ADDING A NEW DEFINITION FOR “COMMUNITY EVENT BANNER” AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS THEREFOR; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________,2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {JZL647340.DOC;2/00006.900000/}- 6 - Packet Page 335 of 433 AM-889 5. 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For:Don Fiene Time:45 Minutes Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Public Hearing on the 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance for Council consent approval adopting the Annual Update to the Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The Engineering Division has completed the proposed 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). It was compiled with input from the Parks and Recreation Department, Public Works Department, Community Services Department, Wastewater Treatment Plant Division and the Administrative Services Department. This Plan shows projected projects and revenues for the funds shown in Attachment 1. The proposed 2007-2013 CIP is provided in Attachment 2. The Engineering Division is in the process of developing a booklet containing descriptions of the 2007-2013 capital projects. This year, for the first time, the project description book will be available on the City web page. The initial briefings of the proposed 2007-2013 CIP were presented to the CS/DS Committee on February 13, 2007 and to the Planning Board on February 14, 2007. Staff presented the CIP again at a public hearing before the Planning Board on March 14, 2007. E-mail comments to the Planning Division from five citizens regarding 80th Avenue West sight distance issues are provided in Attachment 3. Attachment 4 is a copy of the Draft Planning Board Minutes (March 14, 2007). Staff will present an overview of the plan, a summary of issues raised at the Planning Board hearing and will invite public comment. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: CIP Funds List Link: 2007-2013 CIP Link: Citizen E-Mails Link: Planning Board Draft Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/15/2007 09:19 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 09:53 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 09:59 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 10:15 AM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 03/15/2007 08:03 AM Final Approval Date: 03/15/2007 Packet Page 336 of 433 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDS 2007 – 2013 Fund Description/Purpose Division Manager Comprehensive Plan Source of Funds 112 Combined Street Construction Improvement – Arterial Projects Engineering Transportation Comprehensive Plan (2002) Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, Federal & State Transp. Grants, Utility Transfers, Traffic Impact Fees 113 Multimodal Transportation Community Services Federal & State Appropriations and Grants 116 Buildings Maintenance Public Works General Fund 125 Parks, Open Space, Recreation, Beautification Parks & Recreation Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan Real Estate Excise Tax, Contributions from Developers 125 Transportation (REET 2) Engineering Transportation Comprehensive Plan (2002) Real Estate Excise Tax 126 Special Capital (Purchases & Acquisitions) Parks & Recreation Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan Real Estate Excise Tax 129 SR99 – International District Parks & Recreation Economic Development Comprehensive Plan Grants 132 Parks Construction Parks & Recreation Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan Grants 412- 100 Combined Utility Construction Improvement – Water Projects Engineering Water Comprehensive Plan Update (1995), Comprehensive Plan (2002) Combined Utility 412- 200 Combined Utility Construction Improvement – Drainage Projects Engineering Stormwater Comprehensive Plan (2003) Combined Utility 412- 300 Combined Utility Construction Improvement – Sewer Projects Engineering Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan 2006 Combined Utility 414 Wastewater Treatment Plant Wastewater Treatment Plant Secondary Wastewater Treatment Facility Plan Combined Utility (Approx. 50% from Other Municipalities) Packet Page 337 of 433 Packet Page 338 of 433 Packet Page 339 of 433 Packet Page 340 of 433 Packet Page 341 of 433 Packet Page 342 of 433 Packet Page 343 of 433 Packet Page 344 of 433 Packet Page 345 of 433 Packet Page 346 of 433 Packet Page 347 of 433 Packet Page 348 of 433 Packet Page 349 of 433 Packet Page 350 of 433 Packet Page 351 of 433 Packet Page 352 of 433 Packet Page 353 of 433 Packet Page 354 of 433 Packet Page 355 of 433 Packet Page 356 of 433 Packet Page 357 of 433 Packet Page 358 of 433 Packet Page 359 of 433 Packet Page 360 of 433 Packet Page 361 of 433 Packet Page 362 of 433 Packet Page 363 of 433 AM-886 6. Public Hearing on ECDC Amendments to Chapter 19.10 Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Duane Bowman, Development Services Time:45 Minutes Department:Development Services Type: Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Public Hearing on the proposed amendments to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 dealing with development permit requirements for the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area of North Edmonds. The proposal includes an updated Landslide Hazard Area Map. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 19.10 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Previous Council Action The process of updating Chapter 19.10 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) started back in 2004. The goal was to clean-up the regulations and adopt a better map for use in the Earth Subsidence Landslide Area in north Edmonds. A series of action took place in 2004 including: March 23, 2004 Council Work Session April 20, 2004 Public Hearing May 19, 2004 Community Meeting at the Meadowdale Clubhouse July 27, 2004 Council Work Session (power-point presentation) September 13, 2004 CS/DS Committee meeting to review draft Ordinance September 21, 2004 Public Hearing on draft ordinance. Because the City was undertaking new LIDAR aerial mapping for the entire city, the project was delayed to allow more accurate data to be collected. Landau and Associates was hired to study the new data and prepare a new map based upon the more accurate information. On October 9, 2006, staff conducted a community meeting at the Meadowdale Clubhouse to discuss LIDAR Findings and introduce the new draft Landslide Hazard Map. Narrative At the September 21, 2004 Council Meeting, staff was directed to utilize best available science to produce a more accurate Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Map. The City’s consultant, Landau & Associates, utilized LIDAR based technology to prepare a much more accurate map of the boundaries of the landslide hazard area of North Edmonds. Staff and the consultant then worked on the regulations to address issues raised by the community and the development review process. The purpose of this public hearing is to take public testimony on the proposed ordinance changes, including adoption of a new Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Map. Dennis Stettler, P.E., from Landau & Associates, will make a presentation and be available for questions at the hearing. Proposed Administrative Changes to the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Provisions of ECDC 19.10 include: • Eliminate the need for an Architect Stamp on Building Plans • Application and Permit Timeline Extensions • Vicinity Map with greater detail of Adjacent Hazards within 100 feet • Summary Report Created from Roger Lowe and GeoEngineer’s Reports • TEC (Temporary Erosion Control) Requirements Increased, After Storm Inspections Required and Create Provisions for Seasonal Ground Work Extensions • Eliminate Mapped Percentages from Map & Adopt the Hazard Zone Approach for Mitigation • Restrict Rockeries, Swimming Pools, Hot Tubs, Ponds, Watering or Irrigation Systems and Stockpile Fill Packet Page 364 of 433 Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Draft Ordinance - ECDC 19.10 Link: Exhibit 2 - Landau North Edmonds ESLHA Report Link: Exhibit 3 - Draft New ESLHA MAP Link: Exhibit 4 - City Atty response to Hillman Letter Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 08:51 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/16/2007 08:55 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 09:05 AM APRV Form Started By: Duane Bowman Started On: 03/14/2007 03:37 PM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 365 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - 0006.900000 *Significant changes are underlined. WSS/gjz 4/26/04 R;9/8/04gjz ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 19.10 ENTITLED EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area is an area of Edmonds that has been geologically active for thousands of years, and WHEREAS, although public improvements have enhanced the overall stability of property in the area, there remains both an underlying risk of deep seated earth movement and a potential for earth movement based on other factors such as inclement weather, steep slopes, seismic events, acts of man, failures of utility lines and many other factors, and WHEREAS, the City’s policy since 1983 has been to permit development of property in the area consistent with the full extent of the property rights and obligations of its citizens, so long as that development shoulders all costs and liabilities, both current and potential, relating to development of the property, including full investigation of site conditions by competent professionals, design for conditions and notification to the City and the Building Department, neighboring property owners and future purchasers of the property of all risks associated with development and the measures taken to mitigate such risks, NOW, THEREFORE, Packet Page 366 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 19.10 Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas is hereby repealed, provided, however, that in the event that a court of competent jurisdiction should strike down the enactment of Chapter 19.10 as provided in Section 2 below, or any portion thereof, Chapter 19.10 Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas or any part thereof parallel to the portion struck down, shall be and remain in effect to the extent necessary to prevent any gap in regulation. Section 2. The Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Chapter 19.10 Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas to read as follows: Chapter 19.10 BUILDING PERMITS - EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Sections: 19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application. 19.10.010 Section amendments. 19.10.020 Definitions. 19.10.030 Minimum required application submissions. 19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers. 19.10.050 Site bonds, contractor general public liability insurance. 19.10.060 Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available science. 19.10.070 Issuance and denial of permits. 19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and final geotechnical report. Packet Page 367 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - 19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application. A. This chapter has been enacted in order to provide both substantive and procedural provisions relating to the issuance of permits within designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas of the city. It shall be the policy of the city that no permit shall be issued for any site which is found to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography for the particular permit requested for issuance. When development occurs on an unstable site, an unreasonable risk of danger may exist to the public, to public improvements or to adjacent property owners. If such a site can be stabilized through the construction of on-site improvements, that risk may be reduced. B. The construction of professionally designed structures addressing the risks of earth movement, and employing feasible attendant measures (including but not limited to: drainage improvements, specially designed foundations, retaining walls, removal of overburden and other improvements designed to minimize the risk of earth movement, prevent avoidable damage to structures, safeguard adjacent properties, limit risk to inhabitants, and to stabilize the structure in the event of movement) may mitigate and reduce the risk of earth movement on individual properties. Nothing herein shall relieve an owner of any obligation imposed by the State Building Code or City ordinance to take all reasonable and practical measures available to reduce or eliminate the risk or hazard. C. The IRC/IBC, as promulgated by the state of Washington and required to be adopted by the city, does not specify a standard regarding lot stability. Since the city’s request for an interpretation of the uniform building code by the state building code council to designate an acceptable level of lot stability was denied, and because the city wishes to comply with state law requiring that the issuance of building permits be a ministerial and not a discretionary act, the provisions of this chapter have been adopted in order to provide reasonable certainty in the permit issuance process. The purpose of these provisions is not to lessen the minimum requirements of the current adopted building code, but rather to define its requirements for city implementation. D. These provisions have been adopted in order to establish a policy that permits shall not be issued for any site where a substantial risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard exist unless: Packet Page 368 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - 1. The risks can be defined with reasonable scientific certainty and found to be within acceptable limits as determined in accordance with this chapter. 2. Any hazard associated with the site is scientifically ascertained and fully disclosed through the permit process. 3. Notice of any risk is given to future purchasers through the land records of Snohomish County. 4. Any risks associated with construction and habitation are assumed by the builder and future owners of the site. 5. Adequate indemnification is provided by the builder, and the owner of, the site in order that the general public not assume or bear any portion of the costs or liability associated with the builder’s investigation, design and construction as well as the continuing maintenance of the site by the property owner. E. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this ordinance or the IRC/IBC, all applications for permits received for any site, any portion of which lies within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter. In addition to all other requirements of these sections, the restrictions and provisions of this chapter shall apply to all building, grading, fill and excavation permits (herein “permits”). Minor permits such as plumbing, mechanical, re-roof and interior alterations are exempt from the requirements of this chapter. F. All applications for 19.10 ECDC permits shall disclose within the geotechnical report whether or not any part of the site lies within, or adjacent to an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area or within a critical area as defined by the city’s environmentally critical areas title. The building official may require preliminary investigation by a geotechnical engineer for any applicant whose property lies within or lies adjacent to a known earth subsidence landslide hazard area, or within a known hazard area, or areas with steep slopes or unusual topography or which has a history of earth movement in order to assist the building official in determining whether these provisions should be applied. G. Nothing in this chapter should or shall be interpreted to guarantee issuance of a permit with respect to any property unless the requirements of the IRC/IBC as amended and interpreted by this chapter have been met. Packet Page 369 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - 19.10.010 Section amendments. The provisions of this section amend the 2003 edition of the IRC/IBC and all subsequent revisions adopted by RCW 19.27.031 as the state building code as previously amended by Chapter 19.05 ECDC. All prior substantive amendments have received the approval of the state building code council. All provisions of the IRC/IBC which conflict with this chapter shall be deemed amended hereby, and any ambiguity created, shall be resolved in favor of the specific provision or general intent of said chapter. In addition to the amendments of the IRC/IBC by its alteration, improvement and correction to incorporate the chapter, the following specific code provisions are amended and the substantive and procedural requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC are amended by the correction and alteration of the following sections of the IRC/IBC: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section R105.1.1 Permit Review Applicability. Any permit requested for a site lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020(F) shall be processed and acted upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. 2. Section R105.2 Work exempt from a permit. ECDC 19.00.010 exemptions A, B, D, E, F, G, J, K, M, and P and ECDC 19.05.010 exemptions, A, C, and D shall not apply in any area designated as an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(F). 3. Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application. a. Applications, for which no permit is issued within one (1) year following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. Prior to expiration, the applicant may request a seven (7) month application extension if the approval of the application is affected by the wet weather season from October 1st to April 30th. The application may only be extended once. b. The building official may not extend the time for action by the applicant on an expired application. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on current adopted codes and pay new plan review fees as well as any outstanding peer review fees incurred to date. Packet Page 370 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - 4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension. a. Every permit issued under the provisions and development standards of Chapter 19.10 ECDC shall expire by limitation two (2) years after issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)(b). b. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an extension for a third and final year. If the plans and specifications for the permit extension application are the same as the plans and specifications submitted for the original permit application and provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one half the original building permit fee to extend the permit. c. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit shall be required, with full fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The issuance of a new permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or building codes. Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, the time limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision. d. The building official shall reject requests for permit extensions if modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and building codes have occurred since the original issuance of the permit, and modifications or amendments would significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of a new permit. 5. Section R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit. a. In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit application with full fees shall be submitted to the building official. b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and building codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is sought to recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under the codes in effect at the time of complete application for the new permit, not the expired permit. When additional plan review is required, plan Packet Page 371 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 - review fees shall be charged. When applicable peer review and peer review fees shall be assessed. 6. Section R106.3.3.1 Phased approval. a. The building official may require sequencing of construction phases or activities such as the installation of shoring or temporary erosion control remedies and/or drainage systems, well in advance of grading or foundation construction on a time frame consistent with geotechnical recommendations and peer review. As part of the sequencing process, the building official may impose permit conditions that address site work sequencing to include but not limited to: limiting all excavation, drainage systems and foundation installation to the dryer season between May 1st and September 30th. b. When permit conditions such as groundwork are limited by the building official on a particular project, the applicants’ geotechnical engineer may submit a letter detailing geotechnical recommendations that portions of work may progress. The letter shall include a detailed work schedule submitted by the general contractor specifying work to be done, timeline, provisions for monitoring and equipment to be used. Any such recommendation shall be based upon best available science and be consistent with standard geotechnical engineering practice. The building official may require a peer review prior to a decision which provides concurrence regarding at least the following issues: i. duration of work, ii. type of equipment to use, iii. additional temporary erosion and sediment control provisions required, and iv. applicability of special inspections, and similar issues. c. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure have been approved provided peer review approval has been granted. Phased approval means separate permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer, and city public works director, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements (including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage) have been signed as approved by the city Packet Page 372 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 - engineer. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the improvements. B. Chapter 2 Definitions. 1. Section R 202 and IBC 202, are hereby amended to include the definitions set forth in ECDC 19.10.020, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. C. Chapter 4 Foundations. 1. Section R 401.1 General Exception 3. Any permit requested for a site lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be processed and acted upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. D. IBC Chapter 16 Structural design. 1. Section IBC 1601.1.1 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. E. IBC Appendix J Grading. 1. Section IBC Appendix J 101.1.2 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 19.10.020 Definitions. The following terms, when used within this chapter, shall have the following definitions: A. “Architect” shall mean a person licensed to practice architecture by the state of Washington. B. “Best available science” shall be determined in accordance with the criteria established in WAC 365-195-900, et seq. C. “Bluff” shall mean any slope ten (10) feet in height or greater inclined at greater than 1 unit vertical in 1 unit horizontal or 100% slope. D. “Building Official” shall mean the building official of the city of Edmonds. Packet Page 373 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - E. “Director” shall mean the director of development services as well as any authorized representative of the director. F. “Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area” shall mean any area of the city which, by reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topography has a risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances. The earth subsidence and landslide hazard area is a subcategory of landslide hazard area (a geologically hazardous area) as defined in city of Edmonds environmentally critical areas title. The hazard area designated as the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area in the 2007 report of Landau Associates and as may be amended in future adopted earth subsidence and landslide hazard maps are hereby incorporated by this reference and made a part of this chapter as fully as if herein set forth and may be provided in a summary text form. Future adopted landslide hazard maps shall be incorporated by reference upon adoption by ordinance. Areas designated on the adopted North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas Map, or any future adopted landslide hazard map as having a risk of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, areas with slopes as designated in ECDC 23.80.020, areas which exhibit geologic characteristics of earth movement, or any other area identified as having a history of earth movement shall be presumed to have such risk and shall be considered to be an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. Applicants for permits in such areas shall submit a geotechnical report and complete plan set submittal as required by this chapter to the building official for review. The presumption of risk shall be rebuttable and the decision of the director or building official that any area lies within, or adjacent to, such earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be appealable as a staff decision to superior court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act. Copies of the reports and maps shall be maintained in the offices of the building official and shall be available for inspection during all normal working hours. Individual copies of the reports and map may be obtained by the public upon the payment of the cost of reproduction. G. “General Contractor” shall mean a bonded, insured and registered contractor in the state of Washington. A general contractor shall maintain state required bonding and shall carry general public liability insurance in the minimum amount of one Packet Page 374 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 - million dollars. The general contractor shall have a current valid state contractor’s license with the state of Washington and a city of Edmonds resident or non-resident business license, whichever is applicable. H. “Geologist” means a practicing geologist licensed in the state of Washington with at least four (4) years experience as a licensed geologist in responsible charge, including experience with landslide evaluation. I. “Geotechnical Engineer” means a practicing, geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least four (4) years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge, including experience with landslide evaluation. J. “Landslide Hazard Area” means areas mapped or otherwise defined by the city of Edmonds as environmental critical areas or geologically hazardous areas. K. “Land Surveyor” means a person who holds a Washington State land surveyor’s license. L. “Lead Design Professional” means the person designated by the applicant to oversee and coordinate the permit review process on behalf of the applicant. M. “Plan Set Submittal” means a complete application pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015 including: 1. Vicinity Map. 2. Topography map and survey. 3. Civil plans including; grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drainage, utilities and site improvements. 4. Tree cutting/land clearing plans. 5. Geotechnical report. 6. Architectural and structural plans with design calculations, stamped and signed by licensed design professionals of the state of Washington. N. “Site” means the entire area within the boundaries, as described in a legal description, of the property that is to be developed under the permit for which the applicant has applied. Packet Page 375 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 11 - O. “Stable” shall mean that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the reports developed under the requirements of ECDC 19.10.030 and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. In the event that any site has an underlying risk of movement based upon deep-seated earth movement or large-scale earth failure which is not susceptible of correction by on-site improvements, such hazard shall not render a site proposed for single-family residences to be presumed unstable for the purpose of this provision if the geotechnical engineer of record and recommendation of any peer reviewer confirm the risk of probability of earth movement is thirty (30) percent or less within a twenty-five (25) year period. In order to meet the definition of stable the geotechnical report shall include identified hazards for the property and the mitigation measures proposed to reduce or correct the hazards along with measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards, including, all on and off site measures taken to correct or reduce the risk. These shall be fully disclosed to the applicant and future owners, heirs and assigns in the covenant required to be executed in accordance with provisions of this chapter, in which case the defined risk may be approved as an acceptable condition. P. “Steep Slope” shall be defined and calculated pursuant to Chapter 23.80 ECDC. Q. “Storm Event” means one (1) inch or greater precipitation in a twenty-four (24) hour period as reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). R. “Structural Engineer” means a person licensed to practice structural engineering by the state of Washington. S. “Structural Fill” shall mean any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils are intended to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill should be clean and free draining and should be placed above unyielding native site soils compacted in accordance with an approved geotechnical report prepared utilizing best engineering science. Packet Page 376 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 - 19.10.030 Minimum required application submittals. A. The applicant shall submit a complete plan set submittal and permit application and specifications for the proposed development as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(M) and this chapter. B. An Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard area permit submittal checklist shall be adopted at the direction of the director and shall be provided to all persons inquiring regarding building permit applications or development permits in the designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard area of North Edmonds. The submittal checklist shall include but not be limited to the requirements contained in city public handouts, written policies, adopted maps, reference maps, summary reports, minimum geotechnical report guidelines, and the following: 1. North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map. 2. Vicinity map. 3. Topographic map and survey. 4. Civil plans (i.e., grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drainage, utilities and site improvements). 5. Tree cutting/land clearing plan. 6. Geotechnical report. 7. Owner and professional declarations. 8. Detailed architectural and structural plans with structural calculations and specifications. 9. Bonds, covenants and contractor public liability insurance in accordance with the detailed requirements stated below. If any item in the checklist is inapplicable to a particular project, a letter or a report shall be provided to the director stamped by the appropriate licensed design professional, with sufficient information or data to demonstrate why the item is inapplicable. The director may utilize appropriate licensed consultants to determine if generally accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application requirement. When consultants are used to determine if generally accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application requirement the cost of review shall be paid by the applicant. Packet Page 377 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - C. A copy of the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map shall be included in the submittal checklist materials. D. The vicinity map shall be suitable for locating the site and include information related to existing conditions on or near the site, based on the topographic map and survey and shall designate all known landslide masses, or debris flows or mud flows on or near the site which could threaten proposed structures within 100 feet, as referenced, noted, described or discussed in the geotechnical report. E. The applicant shall submit a topographic map and survey prepared and stamped by a licensed land surveyor, prior to studies and evaluations by the geotechnical engineer, and shall show: 1. Map scale, north arrow, legal description, tax account parcel numbers, easements, lot property lines. 2. Existing grade contour lines, at two (2) foot intervals. 3. All distances between existing structures on the site and approximate distances of existing habitable structures on adjacent sites within 50 feet of property lines (all adjacent sites which could affect or be affected by the proposed development shall be shown). 4. Lowest footing or basement slab elevation of existing and proposed structures on the property and on adjacent properties to the extent that such information is reasonably available and, proposed finish floor elevations. 5. The location of existing sanitary sewers, storm water drainage facilities, septic tanks, drain fields, wells, piezometers, private drainage systems, underground storage tanks, subsurface drains, and other sewer/drainage facility components on, and adjacent to, the site to the extent such information is reasonably available. 6. The location of all existing underground utilities on, and adjacent to, the site including, but not limited to; telephone, cable television, gas, electric and water utilities, vaults, fire hydrants and other cables, wires, meters and drainage pipes to the extent that such information is available. 7. A separate topographical drawing shall be submitted showing proposed grade contours at two (2) foot intervals. This drawing shall include bottom of proposed footing elevations including all stepped footing elevations. Packet Page 378 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 14 - F. Civil engineered plans shall be prepared and stamped by a state of Washington licensed civil engineer pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 ECDC and current adopted City Stormwater Manual. Geotechnical report recommendations affecting civil plans shall be incorporated into the design and detailed on the plans and shall include: 1. Storm drainage plan with storm drainage calculations. 2. Provisions for building pad and foundation drainage. 3. Temporary erosion and sediment control with drainage and maintenance provisions, and/or other sediment control assemblies. 4. Permanent erosion control with drainage and maintenance provisions. 5. Fill/soil stockpile limitation provisions, specific location, height, protection and maintenance. 6. Slope protection plans, rockeries, retaining walls, ecology blocks, keystone block walls, soldier pile walls, and soil nail walls. 7. Utilities and site improvements. 8. Grading plans, temporary and permanent shoring plans, top and toe of slope setbacks, driveway slope. G. In lieu of the procedural requirements of Chapter 18.45 ECDC a tree cutting/land clearing plan shall be submitted when significant trees are proposed to be removed. A significant tree is a tree with a trunk diameter of six inches or greater measured 4 feet from the ground. No significant tree shall be removed until the permit is approved. A detailed landscape plan may also be required in order for the city to evaluate long-term erosion control measures. The plan shall comply with all requirements of the ECDC relating to tree clearing and critical areas review, if applicable. The director may require the project geotechnical engineer’s concurrence regarding an approval of a tree cutting/land clearing plan when slope stability is at issue. H. Included in the permit submittal checklist shall be general and specific soils and geotechnical information, details or analysis required pursuant to IBC 1802. The applicant shall retain a geotechnical engineer to prepare a report and evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions on the site to include: Packet Page 379 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 15 - 1. The geotechnical report shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices, under the supervision of, and signed and stamped by, the geotechnical engineer. A geologist may be required to be part of the geotechnical consulting staff. The report shall reference the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007) as a technical document reviewed as part of the geologic analysis for the project and discuss all items listed in the permit submittal checklist and shall make specific recommendations concerning development of the site. 2. The opinions and recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be supported by field observations and, where appropriate or applicable, by literature review, conducted by the geotechnical engineer. The report shall be based on best available science. 3. The report shall include an analysis of material gathered through appropriate explorations, such as borings or test pits to a minimum depth of 6 feet below the proposed lowest footing or pile, an analysis of soil characteristics conducted by or under the supervision of, the engineer in accordance with the standards adopted by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other applicable standards. The report must provide subsurface data to support the engineer’s conclusions regarding slope stability. 4. If the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be reviewed and approved by a geologist. It shall be the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer to assure that the geologist meets the qualifications listed in the definition section. A letter of concurrence from the geologist shall be included in the report. 5. Based upon the North Edmonds Landslide Area Geology and Slide Mechanisms map and table found in the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007), any lot which contains any portion of any hazard zone or is adjacent thereto, (regardless of whether the proposed building pad is located within any hazard area) shall specifically consider within the geotechnical report, the following types of typical hazard zones and shall specifically note if the hazard is, or is not, present on the site. The report shall address hazards from encroaching landslide materials, hazards from ground failure in material that has not previously failed, and hazards from ground failure in previously failed material. For each landslide hazard identified on a property, the geotechnical engineer shall identify the types of specific processes associated with the hazard Packet Page 380 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 16 - and include design features to reduce such hazards and mitigate impacts. 6. For properties containing or adjacent to bluffs, the geotechnical engineer shall, as a part of the building permit process provide analysis of the rate of retreat of the bluff prepared by a geologist and estimate the bluff retreat amount and regression rate for periods of twenty-five (25) and 125 years. The geotechnical engineer shall address the effects of bluff retreat on the stability of structures and/or improvements. A structure is defined as: a. A building intended for human habitation, b. A building, structure or other improvement, whose stress or weight, collapse or movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure and, c. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public safety or provide stability. If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate of retreat of the bluff is such that any structure or improvement constructed pursuant to the building permit would be unreasonably endangered or reasonably could be anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal useful life, the application shall be denied. 7. Geotechnical letter addressing the provisions of Chapter 23.80 ECDC. I. The applicant shall submit, consistent with the findings of the geotechnical report, detailed structural plans with corresponding calculations prepared and stamped by the structural engineer of record. When architectural plans incorporate such structural details said plans shall be stamped and signed by the structural engineer of record. All other architectural plans may be prepared by an architect, designer, builder or lay person. J. The applicant shall submit documentation of required bonds, frozen funds or adequate instrument of credit. The applicants shall submit a copy of the contractor’s general public liability insurance pursuant to ECDC 19.10.050. K. The applicant shall submit declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers as required by ECDC 19.10.040. 19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers. Packet Page 381 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 17 - A. Notices of permit submittal application with the city shall be posted pursuant to ECDC 20.91.010B(b). Such notices shall be conspicuously posted and maintained at each street frontage at the applicant’s expense and direction. Notice of permit issuance or denial shall be conspicuously posted as required above. Upon each posting a ten (10) day appeal period shall commence. Appeals shall be heard at Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, and no other appeal shall be permitted. B. At permit application submittal, the applicant shall submit a written declaration with the permit application that includes the statement that the accuracy of all information is warranted by the owner/applicant in a form which relieves the city and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such submittals. The declaration shall also state that the owner/applicant understands and accepts the risk of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that the owner/applicant will advise in writing any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective purchasers or residential lessees of structures or portions of a structure on the site of the slide potential of the area. The owner applicant shall also acknowledge that he, she or they understand and accept the need for future monitoring and maintenance of the property as described in the final geotechnical report when future monitoring and maintenance may affect slope stability over time. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the city, all conclusions shall be those of the owner/applicant and his or her professionals. C. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter from the geotechnical engineer and civil engineer who prepared the geotechnical report and civil plans, stating that in his or her judgment the plans and specifications submitted for the project conform to the recommendations in the geotechnical report, and that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimized subject to the conditions set forth in the report; and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. Minimized shall mean that the applicant has utilized best available science and commonly accepted engineering and architectural practice to minimize, to the extent possible, the risks associated with development of the property. The geotechnical engineer shall review the erosion and sediment control plan and provide a statement about the adequacy of the Packet Page 382 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 18 - plan with respect to site conditions and report findings. The geotechnical engineer’s statement shall also include an identification of landslide hazards applicable to the site, the on-site measures taken to correct or reduce the hazards, as applicable, and measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards. For sites where the hazards are not mitigated or where the risks from deep-seated or large-scale earth movement cannot be practically reduced by individual lot owners, the geotechnical engineer shall prepare a statement identifying what design measures will be taken to mitigate the risk to structures, adjacent properties, and inhabitants in the event of deep-seated or large- scale movement. The statement shall specify any risks from earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures and render an opinion as to whether the site will be stable within the meaning of the ordinance following installation of all proposed improvements. The statement will clarify to current and future owners what measures were installed to reduce risks and what hazards could not be addressed by individual lot development. D. Further recommendations signed and sealed by the geotechnical engineer shall be provided should there be additions or exceptions to the original recommendations based on the plans, site conditions or other supporting data. If the geotechnical engineer who reviews the plans and specifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report, the new engineer shall, in a letter to the director accompanying the plans and specifications, express agreement or disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and state that the revised plans and specifications conform to the new recommendations. E. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter or notation on the design drawings by the structural engineer of record stating that; he has reviewed the geotechnical report(s), that he understands its recommendations, has explained or has had explained to the owner/applicant, the risk of loss due to slides on the site, and that he has incorporated into the design the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any risk of earth movement referenced in the report. The statement shall note any risks, hazards, potential problems from earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures. F. The owner shall execute a covenant, (in a form provided by the city) to be submitted with the application (with necessary fee) to be Packet Page 383 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 19 - filed with the Snohomish County Auditor. The director shall cause such completed covenant to be so filed. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be forwarded to the owner. This covenant shall be a covenant running with the land, which shall at a minimum include: 1. A legal description of the property. 2. A statement explaining that the site is in a potential earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, that the risk associated with the development of the site is set forth in permit file No. _______ with the city of Edmonds building department, that conditions or prohibitions on development may have been imposed by the city in the course of permit issuance, and referencing any features in the design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soil changes. The covenant may incorporate by reference the statements and conditions to be observed in the form proposed by the owner/applicant’s geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer as approved after the review set forth in ECDC 19.10.060. 3. A statement waiving and promising to indemnify and hold harmless the city of Edmonds, its officers and employees from any claims the owner/applicant and his/her successors or assigns may have for any loss or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting from soil movement and arising from or out of the issuances of any permit(s) authorizing development on the site, as well as due to any act or failure to act by the indemnitor , its agents or successors, in interest under or following issuance of the permit. 4. The date of permit issuance and permit number authorizing the development. 19.10.050 Site bonds and contractor general public liability insurance. A. Site bonding requirements. 1. A surety bond, in an amount to be determined by the director, executed by a surety company authorized to do business in the state of Washington shall be posted by the owner/applicant or general contractor to assure the restoration of any areas on the site, or in the surrounding area, disturbed or damaged by slides during construction, and to ensure completion of the work authorized by the permit, or, if the work is not completed, to assure that the site will be restored to a safe and stable condition at least equal to the safety and stability of the site prior to commencement of work Packet Page 384 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 20 - under the permit. The bond will be exonerated upon occupancy approval of the building permit by the building official. 2. In lieu of the surety bond, the owner/applicant or general contractor may propose to file a cash deposit or an instrument of credit with the director in an amount equal to that which would be required in the surety bond, and similarly conditioned. B. Public liability insurance. The general contractor of record shall carry general public liability insurance effective through final occupancy in the minimum amount of one million dollars, and which shall name the city as an additional named insured, against the injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city’s involvement in the permitting process for the project. C. Homeowner insurance. The city strongly recommends that each property owner maintain policies of liability insurance, adequate to provide sufficient funds, to indemnify and hold harmless third parties in the event of earth subsidence or landslides emanating from or across the owner’s property. 19.10.060 Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available science. A. The city shall require professional peer review of the plan set submittals accompanying the permit application by a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect, and/or structural engineer as may be necessary and determined by the building official or director, in order to determine whether the plan set submittals were prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice or the practice of the particular engineering or design specialty and are based upon best available science. The full cost of such peer review shall be paid in full by the owner/applicant within thirty (30) days of billing by the city. Failure to make timely payments shall result in a stay of city plan review services on the application. B. This requirement may be selectively waived at the discretion of the director provided the applicable project geotechnical engineer, civil engineer or structural engineer provides written concurrence, determination, details, facts and/or data that individual site conditions warrant an exemption from outside peer review. Once waived, the building official shall not be required to inquire further into the adequacy of any report, plans, or data, but rather may rely upon the submittals as warranted by the owner/applicant as Packet Page 385 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 21 - reviewed by the city’s consultant. Nothing herein shall relieve the owner/applicant of the obligation to submit a complete application fulfilling all the requirements of this chapter and the IRC/IBC. C. The final recommendation of the peer review regarding whether a submittal complies with generally accepted practice and/or is based on best available science shall be binding upon the building official. Such recommendation may be appealed to Superior Court under the Land Use Petition Act. 19.10.070 Issuance and denial of permits. A. Permit Issuance. The following requirements must be satisfied before a permit will be issued: 1. An approved geotechnical report has been submitted and approved. 2. Plans and specifications have been submitted incorporating the recommendations of the geotechnical report and said plans have been approved. 3. The required declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers have been submitted and approved. 4. Required bonds, cash deposits and public liability insurance have been posted with the city. 5. When peer review has been required, all submittals have been determined to have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice. 6. Peer review concurrence for permit issuance has been received by the building official. 7. All other provisions of ECDC Titles 16, 18 & 20 have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate city official. B. Permit denial. The following criteria shall result in the denial of issuance of permit: 1. Building, grading and excavation permits for construction on land which the director finds to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography, or Packet Page 386 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 22 - 2. The resulting development would increase the potential of soil movement resulting in an unacceptable risk of damage to adjacent properties or an unreasonable risk of damage to the proposed development, or 3. Excessive flooding, seepage, high water table, or inadequate drainage, or 4. If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate retreat of the bluff is such that any structure or improvement would be unreasonably endangered or reasonably could be anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal useful life, the application shall be denied. A structure is defined as: a. A building intended for human habitation, b. A building, structure or other improvement, whose stress or weight, collapse or movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure and, c. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public safety or provide stability, or 5. Other hazardous conditions posing an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or welfare, or 6. Where the noted site dangers or geologic hazards are not minimized to the extent possible by the use of best available science and generally accepted engineering and architectural practice, or 7. If the applicant’s geotechnical engineer determines that there is a greater chance than thirty (30) percent in a 25 year period that landslide damage on site will occur. C. In making a determination of permit denial, the director shall consider not only the land which is the subject of the application, but in addition, the surrounding area which would be adversely affected if the permit were granted. Permit denial shall be made in writing to the owner/applicant when the site cannot be rendered stable as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(O). This decision and other preliminary determinations as referenced herein shall be appealable to Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act. No other appeal shall be permitted. The appeal period shall commence upon the date of mailing of any preliminary or final decision, or upon posting, if posting is the only notice a party with standing receives under the terms of this chapter. Packet Page 387 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 23 - D. Prohibitions. Because of the relationship of groundwater to stability, the discharge of collected surface water or storm water to the ground surface or subsurface is prohibited on sites within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. In addition, the following construction, buildings, or improvements are hereby prohibited within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area: 1. Swimming pools or hot tubs. 2. Ponds or other artificial impoundments of water. 3. Watering or irrigation systems. 4. Temporary or permanent stockpile of fill on top or bottom of slopes. 5. Rockeries. E. Waiver. The prohibitions established in paragraph D above shall apply unless the property owner requests a waiver based upon the written analysis of a geotechnical engineer which clearly establishes that the proposed improvement will have no reasonable likelihood of triggering or otherwise contributing to any landslide hazard or earth subsidence risk either on the site or in the neighboring earth subsidence or landslide hazard area. In any review or appeal of the director’s or building official’s denial of a waiver to construct an otherwise prohibited improvement, the burden of proof shall always be upon the applicant to establish by a clear preponderance of the evidence, that no such risk will be created by the improvement. Any geotechnical engineering report provided in any review shall consider not only the risk incurred due to or during construction of the otherwise prohibited improvement, but also the potential impacts due to failure to maintain the improvement, damage through reasonably foreseeable events such as earthquakes or other acts of God, or the reasonably foreseeable negligence of the owner or future owners. The director may utilize peer review consultants. 19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and final geotechnical report. A. Site clearing and grading. The owner/applicant or contractor shall secure the building official’s approval before entering an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area site with excavating or other grading and clearing equipment to clear, remove trees or grade for any purpose including the creation of access to the site. Packet Page 388 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 24 - The building official may condition such access approval if site conditions are warranted and when discretionary approval permits are required. As part of the approval process the building official may impose conditions that address site work issues; such measures could include but are not limited to limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the dryer season between May and the end of September, or sequencing activities such as the installation of drainage systems well in advance of construction. Requests for early site access in advance of building permit approval or in the time period between October 1st and April 30th for any purpose shall be submitted to the building official accompanied by written concurrence of the owner/applicant’s geotechnical engineer of record. The building official may utilize peer review consultants to determine whether the request is based on generally accepted engineering practice and is reasonable with regard to time-frame to complete the work, types of equipment proposed to perform the work, length of exposure of slopes, and adequacy of site monitoring and temporary erosion control measures. When such peer review is utilized the applicant is responsible for the peer review fee. B. Reporting authority. The owner/applicant shall retain a geotechnical engineer to monitor the site during construction. The owner/applicant shall preferably retain the geotechnical engineer who prepared the final geotechnical report in the plan set submittal and who has reviewed the approved plans and specifications. If a different geotechnical engineering consultant is retained by the owner/applicant, the new geotechnical engineer shall submit a letter to the director stating that he or she has read all reports and recommendations and reviews to date and state whether or not he or she agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the original geotechnical report and peer review comments. Further recommendations, signed and sealed by the new geotechnical engineer, and supporting data, shall be provided should there be exceptions or changes to the original recommendations that would effect the approved plans. C. Construction monitoring, special inspections. 1. Inspection requirements. During the period from October 1st to April 30th, when on site, the owner/applicant or designated erosion sedimentation control (ESC) site supervisor shall perform erosion Packet Page 389 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 25 - and sedimentation control inspections. Records of installed ESC facilities shall be maintained by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor and copies of all ESC records shall be provided to City inspectors upon request. ESC facilities on inactive sites (sites where no work will be performed for more than three (3) consecutive days) shall be inspected weekly by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor. During all other times of the year, weekly inspections by the ESC site supervisor are required and shall be recorded. 2. Weekly field reports. The geotechnical engineer shall monitor, during construction, compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including; site excavation, shoring, temporary erosion control, soil support for foundation, piles, sub drainage installation, soil compaction and other geotechnical aspects of the construction. Unless otherwise approved by the director, the specific recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be implemented by the owner/applicant. Omissions or deviations from the approved geotechnical report and civil plans shall be highlighted to the city in a separate report. All reports shall be submitted to the city on a weekly basis for review. Failure to submit required reports may result in the issuance of a stop work order. 3. Storm events. During all work periods, special inspections shall be performed after storm events as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(Q). The storm event report shall be provided within one week of the event. D. Final construction report. The geotechnical engineer of record shall prepare a final written report to be submitted to the building official, stating that based upon his or her professional opinion, site observations and final site grading that the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements as shown on the approved plans. Substantially complies means that the completed development offers at least the level of stability and safety, on and off site, as was afforded by the original recommendations and report. Recommendations to the owner/applicant shall be included in the report for future monitoring and maintenance of the property including drainage, tightlines, catch basins, berms, retaining wall drainage, hazard mitigation improvements, slopes, bluffs, vegetation, and permanent erosion control that effect slope stability Packet Page 390 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 26 - over time. Occupancy of the residence shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the building official. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 391 of 433 {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 27 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, REPEALING CHAPTER 19.05 EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS, AND ENACTING IN ITS PLACE CHAPTER 19.10 EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________,2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 392 of 433 North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Summary Report Edmonds, Washington March 14, 2007 Prepared for City of Edmonds Community Services Department Edmonds, Washington 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778-0907 Packet Page 393 of 433 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PURPOSE 1 BACKGROUND 1 North Edmonds Landslide Ordinance 1 Key North Edmonds Area Geotechnical Studies 2 NORTH EDMONDS AREA LANDSLIDE SETTING AND HISTORY 4 Landslide Geology and Setting 4 Landslide History 4 LANDSLIDING – LOCATIONS, HAZARDS, AND PROCESSES 5 Potential Landsliding Locations 6 Landslide Hazards 7 Landslide Processes 7 Severity of Landsliding 8 Changes Over Time 8 Risk Reduction and Mitigation Measures 9 CONCLUSIONS 9 USE OF THIS REPORT 10 REFERENCES 11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title 1 North Edmonds Landslide Area Geology and Slide Mechanisms LIST OF TABLES Table Title 1 Recommended Geotechnical Report Requirements, North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES ii Packet Page 394 of 433 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide a summary of key reports and information that are pertinent to permit applicants and their design team for property development within or adjacent to the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area, as defined by Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 19.10. This document does not summarize individual plat or property consultant reports; these consultant reports are available for review in the City of Edmonds (City) Development Services office. This document provides applicants and their design team with technical information and identifies issues that should be considered and addressed related to landslide hazards and landslide processes in the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area. BACKGROUND The North Edmonds area includes a large historic/prehistoric landslide often called the Meadowdale Landslide in previous documents. The landslide includes a massive downset block of land that extends from the steep bluffs along the east edge of the slide to Puget Sound. In this summary report, the downset block is referred to as the “landslide mass.” The identification of the landslide mass will change over time. Some areas currently outside of the landslide mass may become part of the mass as slopes regress from natural or other erosional processes. The landslide mass is defined as the area that has previously moved in historic or prehistoric times and is referred to as the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (North Edmonds ESLHA). This area is subject to the terms of the City’s original “Meadowdale Ordinance” (Ordinance #2661) and subsequent revisions and updates enacted by the City of Edmonds. The requirements of the most recent ordinance revisions are contained in ECDC Chapter 19.10. Development in Landslide Hazard Areas, including areas both within and outside of the North Edmonds ESLHA, is also controlled by the provisions of ECDC 23.80, Geologically Hazardous Areas. NORTH EDMONDS LANDSLIDE ORDINANCE The North Edmonds (Meadowdale) landslide hazards and risks have been known for a number of years, and the landslide has been the subject of many previous geologic and geotechnical studies. Large scale landsliding of the area was described in newspapers in 1947 and damaging slides have been historically recorded in many years since that time. In the past, development in the area was limited because of landslide hazards. In 1984, Local Improvement District (LID) No. 210 was passed for the Meadowdale area (which included the landslide mass as well as properties east of the slide). In 1984, a public sanitary sewer, limited storm sewers, and other drainage components were installed under this 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1 Packet Page 395 of 433 LID. The installation of these various LID improvements generally lowered groundwater levels within the slide and lowered the risk to new development. Since 1988, residential development has been allowed in the landslide area under specific conditions and requirements prescribed under City Ordinance 2661. The ordinance included development guidelines and requirements to limit risks for a property owner and risk of impacts to adjacent properties. Development within the landslide area under Ordinance 2661 has occurred assuming that an acceptable risk of landsliding for a property is less than 30 percent in 25 years. Under those conditions, property development was only allowed if a property owner and their consultant provided an estimated landslide risk for the property, based on sound scientific and engineering principles, that was less than 30 percent in 25 years. Substantial risks due to landslide hazards exist within the North Edmonds ESLHA. These risks are estimated to range from less than 10 percent probability of occurrence in 25 years to about 30 percent probability of occurrence in 25 years (GeoEngineers 1985). The actual landslide hazard risk depends on both regional and site-specific conditions, including topography, geology, surface water, groundwater, and vegetation conditions. In many cases, the landslide hazard risk can be reduced and impacts mitigated through appropriate siting, land development, and design features. It is the responsibility of the applicant and their design team to: Clearly identify landslide hazards that affect or are affected by property development, and • • • • Provide measures to reduce hazards and mitigate impacts. KEY NORTH EDMONDS AREA GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES The current understanding of the North Edmonds ESLHA has been developed from geologic and geotechnical studies that began in the 1960s and have continued through the present time. Most of these reports are available for viewing at the City’s Development Services office. Key area-wide technical reports are summarized below. The following key reports have formed the historic basis of the North Edmonds ESLHA and the related ordinances enacted by the City. Dames & Moore. 1968. This report evaluated the overall stability of the Meadowdale area from a geologic standpoint and identified soil and groundwater conditions, described slide history of the area, and provided a map showing geologic contacts, the ancient slide scarp, and areas of 1947 and 1955-56 movement. This report concluded that it was feasible to install sanitary sewers and that installation would benefit the stability of the area. This report also suggested that new residential development in much of the Meadowdale area should be prohibited unless some measures are made to control groundwater and surface water. Roger Lowe Associates, Inc. 1979. This report provided a summary of the Meadowdale area landslide history, geology, and hydrology. This report provided a landslide hazard map that enumerated the probability of landslide hazards in the Meadowdale slide area at the time the 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2 Packet Page 396 of 433 report was prepared (prior to LID sewer and drainage improvements). The probabilities of landslide movement ranged from 2 to 90 percent over a 25-year period and much of the landslide mass area had probabilities greater than 30 percent. The probabilities presented in the report were based on a 30- to 40-year historical record and site observations of landslide feature ages and activity. The report identified that the stability of the Meadowdale Landslide is very sensitive to groundwater levels. The report also identified land use and risk reduction measures, including the installation of sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and interceptor drains. The report provided a summary of the results of stability analyses with respect to possible improvements in factors of safety and potential lowered groundwater levels. GeoEngineers, Inc. 1985. This report provided a summary of predicted improvements in stability due to the LID measures implemented in 1984. GeoEngineers’ evaluation was based on comparing 4 years of groundwater data prior to the LID construction with 3 months of data following LID construction. The report concluded that an average 3-ft decline in groundwater levels was observed in the Meadowdale Landslide mass. The decline in groundwater levels was tied to an increase in factor of safety and a decrease in landslide hazard risk. A map showing this decreased landslide risk, modified from the original 1979 mapping, was provided in this report. The probabilities shown on the revised map range from 2 to 30 percent over a 25-year period. The reduction in probabilities presented in the report was based on subjective evaluations that related change in factor of safety from lower groundwater levels to reduction in risk. The intent of the report was to help identify and approximately quantify the relative degree of risk for various broad areas within the overall landslide mass so that this information could be used for planning and communication of the relative landslide hazards to the public. The information was not intended to provide a detailed assessment of lot-specific landslide hazards or a precise estimate of landslide probabilities at a particular location. • • Landau Associates. 2007. Previous mapping of the landslide hazard area boundary was based on hand-drawn lines on older USGS base maps. Various inaccuracies became evident in the base map over time. In addition, the landslide boundary included areas that had previously failed as a result of landslide movement, as well as some adjacent areas that could be hazardous, but had not yet failed. The definition of what was inside or outside the boundary line was not always consistent and subject to interpretation. To address these issues, the City had LiDAR (light detection and ranging) mapping flown of the entire city in 2005. The topographic and imaging data from the LiDAR survey provided current, high quality base mapping that formed the basis for the development of landslide hazard mapping for the entire city. Particular emphasis was placed on the North Edmonds ESLHA. Topographic data, LiDAR imaging, previous geologic studies, geotechnical reports prepared for individual properties, and geologic mapping was reviewed to develop the boundary of the North Edmonds ESLHA. It was decided that the boundary of the North Edmonds ESLHA should be set at the interpreted boundary of the landslide mass (i.e., the interpreted top of the landslide scarp surrounding the North Edmonds landslide). The results of the mapping and evaluation process are summarized in a Landau Associates report and the North Edmonds ESLHA boundary line is incorporated in the City’s Landslide Hazard Area maps. It should be noted that setting the boundary line at the interpreted top of the landslide scarp defines the intended extent of the requirements of ECDC 19.10 for the North Edmonds ESLHA and is not meant to imply that landslide hazards are not present beyond that line. However, requirements for considering and addressing landslide hazard areas defined on the basis of slope steepness and requirements for addressing areas adjacent to landslide hazard areas are already addressed in ECDC 23.80, Geologically Hazardous Areas. 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3 Packet Page 397 of 433 NORTH EDMONDS AREA LANDSLIDE SETTING AND HISTORY An understanding of the landslide setting, conditions, and history will help the applicant and their design team to better address issues in site development. LANDSLIDE GEOLOGY AND SETTING The soils in the North Edmonds area include soils from glacial and interglacial periods and disturbed soils from post-glacial landslide processes. Outside of the landslide area (east of the landslide), the uppermost soil in many areas is glacial till—an unsorted and consolidated mixture of sand, silt, and gravel that has been glacially consolidated and is very dense. Directly beneath this unit (or at the surface if till is not present), is a glacial outwash deposit of sand and sandy gravel. The bottom of the outwash deposit often includes transitional interbeds of silty sand and silt. The glacial outwash unit is present along the steep slopes that form the eastern edge of the landslide. Both the glacial till and the outwash are considered to be from the most recent glacial period, termed the Vashon age. An older-age sequence of silt and clay, often termed the Whidbey Formation, underlies the outwash deposit. Within the landslide mass, the outwash sands and underlying silt and clay have been disturbed from sliding and form landslide deposits. In some cases, the landslide movement has completely mixed up these soils so no soil structure can be seen. In other cases, landslide failure occurred as large blocks of soil that stayed intact, so bedding may be visible. Landsliding in the area is caused by a combination of topography, geology, and groundwater. The slopes throughout the area are steeper than the strength of soils will support. Within the landslide complex, soils strengths in disturbed soils are very low, so slopes may be unstable at 3H:1V (horizontal:vertical) or 4H:1V and flatter. On the outer edge of the landslide complex, undisturbed soils have higher strengths, but existing slopes are also steeper; many areas are steeper than 1H:1V, and slopes are potentially unstable. In both conditions, groundwater or seepage is typically a triggering factor acting to reduce soil strength and cause erosion. The subsurface conditions present on the east edge of the landslide complex are similar to other landslide areas in the Puget Sound region; permeable sands are eroded by groundwater that lies above relatively impermeable silts and clays causing a zone of frequent and active ground movement. LANDSLIDE HISTORY Landsliding in the area, and throughout the Puget Sound region, probably began thousands of years ago as glaciers retreated. The landsliding activity reflects a process of steep slopes attempting to reach geologic equilibrium. The North Edmonds landslide is not yet in equilibrium, so continued ground 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 4 Packet Page 398 of 433 movements should be expected to occur for an extended period of at least hundreds and possibly thousands of years into the future. Several very large landslide events have been documented in the area in the 1940s and 1950s (information prior to the 1940s has not been identified). In 1947 an area south of the wharf was involved in a large landslide event that had been identified variously as between about 800 ft long (Dames & Moore 1968) to greater than 2,400 ft long (Seattle Post-Intelligencer February 23, 1947), with impacts that extended up to about 1,000 ft eastward from the shoreline. As part of this landslide event, which apparently continued over some period of time, four homes were reportedly wrecked and 20 to 40 homes threatened or endangered. In 1955-56, another large slide is documented (Dames & Moore 1968) that destroyed at least 2 homes and damaged many other homes. It is appropriate to note that the density of development in this area in the 1940s and 1950s was significantly less than present day conditions. A large-scale landslide similar to these earlier landslides could be expected to involve many more structures if it were to occur today. Since the 1950s, large-scale movements of the landslide mass have not been documented. Generalized movement does occur in the landslide area as evidenced by roadway cracking and localized, small-scale slope failures. The risk of large-scale landsliding has been substantially reduced by the LID improvements that were installed in 1984. However, extreme climatic conditions have the potential to affect groundwater sufficiently to reactivate the overall landslide mass. For instance, the ‘rain-on-snow’ event of late 1996 and early 1997 caused several slides in the North Edmonds area and throughout the Puget Sound region. In particular, large-scale landslides that caused significant damage occurred along the bluffs in the town of Woodway and in the Perkins Lane area of Magnolia Hill in Seattle. Smaller scale landsliding, such as sloughs or debris flow on the east edge (scarp) of the landslide complex and movements of benches within the landslide mass continue to occur indicating that the North Edmonds landslide area is still active. LANDSLIDING – LOCATIONS, HAZARDS, AND PROCESSES Previous geologic reports for the area considered landslide locations, hazards, and processes known at the time the reports were completed. Although the specific boundaries of areas with certain hazards may have changed over time, the concept of identifying landslide hazards and processes is still directly applicable to development within the North Edmonds ESLHA. The previous reports did not provide detail about the expected severity of landsliding with respect to property damage or potential loss of life. It should be noted that most previous reports were completed before substantial development of the area within and directly adjacent to the landslide area. Some small landslides (such as from bluffs along the east side of the landslide complex), may be happening more frequently over time (or they may 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 5 Packet Page 399 of 433 now be reported more often as development has increased on properties near the bluff). The type and frequency of landsliding should be expected to change over time—factors that need to be considered for development. The location of landslides, the types of hazards, and the landslide process affect the development of properties in the North Edmonds ESLHA. Table 1 summarizes relationships between location, type of landslide hazard, landslide processes, and recommended geotechnical report requirements and issues to be considered in the design of property improvements within or adjacent to the North Edmonds ESLHA. Specific requirements for development are provided in the City of Edmonds North Edmonds ESLHA Checklist for Permit Submittal and the Geotechnical Report Guidelines. POTENTIAL LANDSLIDING LOCATIONS In and adjacent to the North Edmonds ESLHA, various types of landslide hazards and processes may occur at different locations. For a common understanding of landslide issues, the North Edmonds landslide area has been divided into five zones, A through E. These zones are schematically shown on Figure 1. Zone A. This zone includes the lowermost (west) parts of the landslide. Slide movement from the large-scale slide complex and smaller slides within the complex can both affect this zone. Impacts from sliding in this zone have the potential to affect the nearby Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad. • • • • Zone B. This zone includes the majority of the landslide mass or complex. Soils in this area are typically disturbed, although blocks of intact soil may be found within this zone. Localized small-scale failures occur in this zone from weak soils and localized groundwater conditions. Large-scale sliding of the slide complex has the potential to affect this zone. Zone C. This zone lies near the edge of the landslide complex. This zone is most affected by landslide hazards due to slides that initiate on the steep slopes on the east side of this zone. Small-scale failures within this zone are also possible. This zone has the highest risk to public safety. Zone D. This zone encompasses the active scarp of the landslide and incorporates ground that is outside the currently active landslide area. The west part of this zone includes parts of the slope that are actively failing as shallow debris slides. This zone also includes areas that can potentially fail as large block failures. The eastern part of this zone includes currently stable ground that has not yet failed behind the present top of the landslide scarp. This area could be subject to failure from a large block-type landslide failure or a series of shallower debris slides occurring on the face of the bluff and the resultant bluff retreat over a period of years. Any development near a designated landslide hazard zone will require consideration of the landslide hazard, potential bluff retreat, and buffers (designated as a distance of 50 ft or the height of the steep slope back from the top of the slope, whichever is greater, per the requirements of ECDC 23.80). 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 6 Packet Page 400 of 433 Zone E. This zone lies outside of the active landslide area and the area that may be involved in long-term slope retreat. However, development in this zone has the potential to contribute to surface water or groundwater conditions that affect hazards within Zones A though D. Locally steep slopes may also be present in this area that are unrelated to the North Edmonds ESLHA, but that could be considered a landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC 23.80. • • • • • • • • • It is important to understand that it is possible to have features, hazards, and processes common to one zone present in another zone. As part of development permitting, the applicant and their design team will need to identify specific hazards and processes that apply to the property. LANDSLIDE HAZARDS Four different types of landslide hazards were identified by Roger Lowe Associates (1979) and GeoEngineers (1985) on their maps. These hazards consist of: No hazard identified Encroaching landslide debris originating upslope Hazards from landslides in ground that has not previously failed Hazards from reactivating landslide debris causing ground failure and movement. More than one type of hazard can occur at any given location. Due to impacts from landsliding adjacent to an area, hazards can occur in areas that have previously been stable and have not previously failed. The landslide hazards identifiers also recognize that landsliding and related hazards can occur in areas that are now stable, but that have the potential to become unstable at some time in the future. The applicant and their design team must identify all landslide hazards that currently exist on the property, as well as those likely to exist in the future, and determine if those hazards have the potential to affect human safety or cause property damage. LANDSLIDE PROCESSES The Landslide Hazard Map, initially developed by Roger Lowe Associates (1979) and also used by GeoEngineers (1985) identified four landslide processes that commonly occur in the area: Slumps Debris Slides Debris Avalanches Debris Flows. 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 7 Packet Page 401 of 433 Multiple hazards and multiple processes can be present at any location. For each hazard identified on a property, the applicant and their design team shall identify the types of processes associated with the hazard. The site design should include features to reduce hazards, mitigate impacts from site hazards, and cause no additional impacts to other property owners in the area. SEVERITY OF LANDSLIDING Previous maps of the North Edmonds landslide area did not distinguish between size or severity of landslide hazards. As part of the development permit process, applicants and their design team should assess the size of possible landslide impacts and present design features to mitigate impacts. All impacts that could affect public safety must be mitigated. It may not be possible to fully mitigate property damage impacts from very large-scale landsliding. In this case, the applicant’s geotechnical report should clearly identify the steps taken to reduce the impacts and the possible impacts that are not fully mitigated by design. For instance, the designer’s report should note that significant structural damage should be expected if large-scale reactivation of the North Edmonds landslide should occur. CHANGES OVER TIME The risk of landslide hazards in the area will remain substantial for hundreds to thousands of years. Landslide processes and susceptible locations will change over time. Some changes may be due to human influences; other changes are part of natural geologic processes. The assessment of landslide hazards and processes on a parcel should consider changes that may occur over time. For all zones, development shall not increase the likelihood, extent, or severity of hazard for the applicant’s property or other properties. For lots in Zones C and D, slope retreat processes must be explicitly considered in the applicant’s technical documentation. For these zones, applicants should evaluate the effect of slope retreat processes over a minimum 120-year period. The 120-year period has been chosen as the normal useful life of residential structures under normal upkeep and maintenance conditions. For some site improvements, an alternate ‘normal useful life’ may be appropriate and can be proposed by the applicant. Groundwater levels in and near the North Edmonds area will affect the stability in all zones. Groundwater levels are affected by a wide range of factors, both natural and human caused. Changing climatic conditions could lead to increased groundwater levels in the future. Municipal sewers and storm sewers and drains remove some surface water before it can re-infiltrate back into the landslide mass. However, watering associated with gardens and lawns introduces water back into the landslide area and into the groundwater and removal of trees and vegetation also increases the amount of precipitation that is available to infiltrate to the groundwater. Thus, the net effect from human factors is not known. 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 8 Packet Page 402 of 433 RISK REDUCTION AND MITIGATION MEASURES The applicant and their design team need to evaluate the landslide hazards in relationship to the proposed development and incorporate means to reduce the risk related to potential landsliding and to develop measures to mitigate the potential remaining hazards. Mitigation measures may take a variety of forms, depending on the specific site conditions and details of the design. For example, some structures within the North Edmonds ESLHA have been supported on pile foundations extending down through the landslide debris and founded on underlying undisturbed materials. Other projects have been designed with a shallow foundation consisting of a relatively rigid structural foundation mat or grid that is designed to span over areas of underlying vertical or horizontal soil movement. In essence, the structure is designed to stay intact even if soil support under a portion of the structure is lost due to landsliding. Structures located near the base of the steep bluff have been designed considering the potential for landslide debris flow originating from upslope areas. Mitigation measures for structures near the base of the steep slope that could be impacted by debris flows have included debris deflection or catchment walls above the structure, reinforced shear walls within the structure, minimal door or window openings on the uphill side of the structure, and placement of the main living and sleeping areas away from the upslope side of the house. CONCLUSIONS The 1984 LID activities, a combination of sanitary sewers (with associated removal of septic systems) and limited storm drainage improvements, have, on the average, lowered groundwater levels and improved the stability of areas within the landslide mass. The storm drainage portions of the LID were installed primarily to protect City-owned property such as the new sanitary sewer line. The LID improvements were not intended to address groundwater levels outside the landslide mass, and thus have not changed stability in these areas. The improvement in stability from lower groundwater levels could change in the future, and activities associated with the development of the North Edmonds ESLHA and surrounding areas can affect stability in both positive and negative ways. The North Edmonds ESLHA Ordinance and associated requirements contained in ECDC 19.10 allows development if landslide risks can be reduced and impacts can be shown to be mitigated by appropriate design. Nonetheless, it is imperative that applicants and homeowners understand that living in a known landslide area presents a real and substantial risk to both public safety and private/public property. Residents in and immediately adjacent to the North Edmonds ESLHA should be prepared to accept that risk. 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 9 Packet Page 403 of 433 Packet Page 404 of 433 REFERENCES Dames & Moore. 1968. Report of Geologic Evaluation, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington. Prepared for the City of Edmonds. September 23. GeoEngineers, Inc. 1985. Report of Geotechnical; Consultation Property Value Appraisals and Assessments Meadowdale Landslide Area, Edmonds, Washington. Prepared for the City of Edmonds. February 28. Landau Associates. 2007. Technical Memorandum. Summary of LiDAR Processing and Evaluation Methods, LiDAR Mapping Evaluation Project, Edmonds, Washington. Prepared for the City of Edmonds. March. Roger Lowe Associates, Inc. 1979. Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investigation, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington. Prepared for the City of Edmonds. October 16. 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_rpt.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 11 Packet Page 405 of 433 75 t h A v e . W . Potential Large Block Failure Slide Potential Debris Seepage ???? ? ? ? ? ? 0 100 200 300 Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E West East BN S F R a i l r o a d 250 150 50 Puget Sound ? ? ? ???? GLACIAL OUTWASH SANDS Sand/Sandy Gravel North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ECDC 19.10) Potential Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer Equal to the Height of the Steep Slope or 50 ft, Whichever is Greater (ECDC 23.80) Potential Slope Retreat Ground Surface Potential Landslide Hazard Area (ECDC 23.80) Elevation (Feet) WHIDBEY FORMATION Silt/ClayGround Surface SLIDE COMPLEX (Disturbed/Mixed Sand/Silt/Clay) Potential Large-Scale Slope Instability Potential Large-Scale Slope Instability Potential Large-Scale Slope Instability Potential Debris Slide Potential Localized Small-Scale Slope Instabilities Potential Localized Small-Scale Slope Instabilities Landslide Rupture Surface (Actual Depth Varies) Potential Localized Small-Scale Slope Instabilities North Edmonds Landslide Area Geology and Slide Mechanisms North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Edmonds, Washington FigureCi t y o f E d m o n d s / N o r t h E d m o n d s L a n d s l i d e H a z a r d A r e a s | V : \ 0 7 4 \ 1 3 7 \ 2 0 0 \ S u m m a r y R e p o r t \ F i g 1 . d w g ( A ) " F i g u r e 1 " 1 2 / 2 2 / 2 0 0 6 0 100 200 Approximate Scale in Feet Vertical Exaggeration = 2x 1.This cross section is intended to be a schematic representation of typical landslide zones, landslide configuration, and landslide mechanisms within the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area. The landslide zone boundaries are conceptual only. 2.For an explanation of Zones see Table 1. Notes Packet Page 406 of 433 Page 1 of 2 TABLE 1 RECOMMENDED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS NORTH EDMONDS EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA Locations Technical Issues and Landslide Hazards Recommended Report Requirements Recommended Key Design Features All Zones Possible Technical Issues • Localized slope instability • Large-scale slope instability • Risk to public safety • Risk to private/public property • Potential impacts to North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area and other properties from surface water or groundwater conditions • Potential localized Landslide Hazard Area due to steep slopes (ECDC 23.80) Possible Potential Hazards • Encroaching landslide debris originating upslope • Reactivation of landslide debris causing ground failure and movement • Landslide in ground that has not previously failed Possible Report Requirements • Subsurface exploration must be at least 6 ft deeper than lowest elevation of the proposed foundation • Subsurface exploration required for retaining structures • Subsurface exploration must include measurement or estimate of high seasonal groundwater conditions • Provide estimated vertical and horizontal differential movement for appropriate foundation design • Provide criteria for minimum span distance between foundation support due to potential loss of soil support • Provide information about the potential size and mass of landslide debris originating upslope • Provide required foundation and wall loading conditions based on impact forces from landslide debris originating upslope if determined to be a risk • Establish Steep Slope Buffer width based on rate of slope retreat or stable slope angle over 120-year period • Include a minimum 15 ft setback from Steep Slope Buffer for all site development • Provide recommendations for suitable vegetation; in most cases, buffer shall be maintained in undisturbed, natural condition • Determine if activities on property, particularly drainage features, are expected to impact the Landslide Hazard Area • Full Geotechnical Report may not be required if outside of the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area and other designated Landslide Hazard Areas Possible Key Design Features • Temporary and permanent fills may be restricted • Roof drains and impervious surface runoff should be tightlined to stormwater system and separate from footing drain lines • Stormwater infiltration typically prohibited in hazard area • Permanent irrigation systems prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D; minimize water that is used for irrigation in all zones • Select native, drought-tolerant vegetation (dense, low-lying, and deeply rooted species) • Outdoor swimming pools prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D • If permitted, hot tubs should include special design features so that tub water is conveyed to a suitable and approved discharge point • Foundations should withstand high lateral forces from upslope and large-scale movement • Foundations should be designed to withstand loss of soil beneath parts of foundation • Structures should be designed to accommodate a certain level of vertical and horizontal movement from local and large-scale landsliding • Depending on location, may need to consider features for human safety from encroaching materials including deflection walls, reinforced shear walls; appropriate home layout features • Reinforced shear walls; appropriate door and window placement • Appropriate location of main living and sleeping areas • No yard waste, debris or fill may be placed within Steep Slope Buffer on either a temporary or permanent basis • No permanent irrigation in buffer or setback • No water discharged or infiltrated in landslide, buffer or setback Zone A Specific Technical Issues • Localized slope instability • Large-scale slope instability • Risk to public safety • Risk to private/public property Specific Potential Hazards • Reactivation of landslide debris causing ground failure and movement Specific Report Requirements • Subsurface exploration must be at least 6 ft deeper than lowest elevation of the proposed foundation • Subsurface exploration required for retaining structures • Subsurface exploration must include measurement or estimate of high seasonal groundwater conditions • Provide estimated vertical and horizontal differential movement for appropriate foundation design • Provide criteria for minimum span distance between foundation elements Specific Key Design Features • Temporary and permanent fills may be restricted • Roof drains and impervious surface runoff should be tightlined to stormwater system and separate from footing drain lines • Stormwater infiltration typically prohibited in hazard area • Permanent irrigation systems should not be allowed in Zones A, B, C, D; minimize water that is used for irrigation in all zones • Select native, drought-tolerant vegetation (dense, low-lying, and deeply rooted species) • Outdoor swimming pools prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D • If permitted, hot tubs should include special design features so that tub water is conveyed to a suitable and approved discharge point • Foundations should withstand high lateral forces from upslope and large-scale movement • Foundations should be designed to withstand loss of soil beneath parts of foundation • Structures should be designed to accommodate a certain level of vertical and horizontal movement from local and large-scale landsliding Zone B Specific Technical Issues • Localized slope instability • Large-scale slope instability • Risk to public safety • Risk to private/public property Specific Potential Hazards • Reactivation of landslide debris causing ground failure and movement Specific Report Requirements • Subsurface exploration must be at least 6 ft deeper than lowest elevation of the proposed foundation • Subsurface exploration required for retaining structures • Subsurface exploration must include measurement or estimate of high seasonal groundwater conditions • Provide information about the potential size and mass of landslide debris originating upslope • Provide estimated vertical and horizontal differential movement for appropriate foundation design • Provide criteria for minimum span distance between foundation elements • Provide required foundation and wall loading conditions based on impact forces from landslide debris originating upslope if determined to be a risk Specific Key Design Features • Temporary and permanent fills may be restricted • Roof drains and impervious surface runoff should be tightlined to stormwater system and separate from footing drain lines • Stormwater infiltration prohibited in hazard area • Permanent irrigation systems prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D; minimize water that is used for irrigation in all zones • Select native, drought-tolerant vegetation (dense, low-lying, and deeply rooted species) • Outdoor swimming pools prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D • If permitted, hot tubs should include special design features so that tub water is conveyed to a suitable and approved discharge point 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_Tb1.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Packet Page 407 of 433 Page 2 of 2 TABLE 1 RECOMMENDED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS NORTH EDMONDS EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA Locations Technical Issues and Landslide Hazards Recommended Report Requirements Recommended Key Design Features • Landslide in ground that has not previously failed • Encroaching landslide debris originating upslope • Structures should be designed to accommodate a certain level of vertical and horizontal movement from local and large-scale landsliding • Foundations should be designed to withstand loss of soil beneath parts of foundation • Depending on location, may need to consider features for human safety from encroaching materials including deflection walls, reinforced shear walls; appropriate home layout features Zone C Specific Technical Issues • Localized slope instability • Large-scale slope instability • Risk to public safety • Risk to private/public property Specific Potential Hazards • Encroaching landslide debris originating upslope • Reactivation of landslide debris causing ground failure and movement • Landslide in ground that has not previously failed Specific Report Requirements • Subsurface exploration must be at least 6 ft deeper than lowest elevation of the proposed foundation • Subsurface exploration required for retaining structures • Subsurface exploration must include measurement or estimate of high seasonal groundwater conditions • Provide information about the potential size and mass of landslide debris originating upslope • Provide required foundation and wall loading conditions based on impact forces from landslide debris originating upslope if determined to be a risk • Provide estimated vertical and horizontal differential movement for appropriate foundation design Specific Key Design Features • Temporary and permanent fills may be restricted • Roof drains and impervious surface runoff should be tightlined to stormwater system and separate from footing drain lines • Stormwater infiltration typically prohibited in hazard area • Permanent irrigation systems prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D; minimize water that is used for irrigation in all zones • Select native, drought-tolerant vegetation (dense, low-lying, and deeply rooted species) • Outdoor swimming pools prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D • If permitted, hot tubs should include special design features so that tub water is conveyed to a suitable and approved discharge point • Depending on location, may need to consider features for human safety from encroaching materials including deflection walls, reinforced shear walls; appropriate home layout features • Reinforced shear walls; appropriate door and window placement • Appropriate location of main living and sleeping areas Zone D Specific Technical Issues • Risk to public safety • Risk to private/public property Specific Potential Hazards • Landslide in ground that has not previously failed Specific Report Requirements • Subsurface exploration must be at least 6 ft deeper than lowest elevation of the proposed foundation • Subsurface exploration required for retaining structures • Subsurface exploration must include measurement or estimate of high seasonal groundwater conditions • Establish Steep Slope Buffer width based on rate of slope retreat or stable slope angle over 120-year period • Include a minimum 15 ft setback from Steep Slope Buffer for all site development • Provide recommendations for suitable vegetation; in most cases, buffer shall be maintained in an undisturbed, natural condition Specific Key Design Features • Temporary and permanent fills may be restricted • Roof drains and impervious surface runoff should be tightlined to stormwater system and separate from footing drain lines • Stormwater infiltration typically prohibited in hazard area • Permanent irrigation systems prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D; minimize water that is used for irrigation in all zones • Select native, drought-tolerant vegetation (dense, low-lying, and deeply rooted species) • Outdoor swimming pools prohibited in Zones A, B, C, D • If permitted, hot tubs should include special design features so that tub water is conveyed to a suitable and approved discharge point • Steep Slope Buffer is to be maintained in a natural, undisturbed condition; no gardens, patios, steps, pavers, garden retaining walls, sheds, patios or other garden our outdoor development features are allowed in buffer • No yard waste, debris or fill may be placed within Steep Slope Buffer on either a temporary or permanent basis • No permanent irrigation in buffer or setback • No water discharged or infiltrated in buffer or setback Zone E Specific Technical Issues • Potential impacts to North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area and other properties by affecting surface water or groundwater conditions Specific Potential Hazards • Potential localized Landslide Hazard Area due to steep slopes (ECDC 23.80) Specific Report Requirements • Subsurface exploration must be at least 6 ft deeper than lowest elevation of the proposed foundation • Subsurface exploration required for retaining structures • Subsurface exploration must include measurement or estimate of high seasonal groundwater conditions • Determine if activities on property, particularly drainage features, are expected to impact the Landslide Hazard Area • Full Geotechnical Report may not be required Specific Key Design Features • Temporary and permanent fills may be restricted • Roof drains and impervious surface runoff should be tightlined to stormwater system and separate from footing drain lines • Stormwater infiltration typically prohibited in hazard area • Select native, drought-tolerant vegetation (dense, low-lying, and deeply rooted species) • Hot tubs should include special design features so that tub water conveyed to a suitable and approved discharge point 3/14/07 \\Edmdata\projects\074\137\FileRm\R\NEdmondsLandslideSumm_Tb1.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Packet Page 408 of 433 75th Pl W 156 St SW 75th Pl W 72 nd A v e W N Meadowdale Rd 158 St SW 74th Pl W 73rd Pl W 162nd St SW 72nd Pl W 74th Pl W 7 4 t h P l W 164t h Pl SW 164t h St SW 72nd Ave W 71st Pl W 7 0 th Pl W 2 ft To pograph ic Co nto urVertical datum: NAVD88 Parcel Steep Slope Areas: Slope of 40% or stee per a nd with a vertical relief of ten (1 0) ft or mo re(See ECDC 23.80.020 B.2) North Edmonds Earth Subside nce a nd Landsli de Hazard Area(See ECDC 23.80.020 B.1 and ECDC 19.10)(N ote: Bo undarie s are the a pproximate extentof previou s lan dslidi ng; ha za rd s are present adjacen t to the landsl ide bound aries) Legend North EdmondsEarth Subsidence andLandslide Ha zardAreas Map 0 100 200 Scale in Feet Map creat ed by Landau Associates, Inc. (May 2006)Aerial photo: City of EdmondsTopographic contour s and steep slopes data derivedfrom LiDAR data: City of Edmonds (February 27, 2005) Mi nimum buffer equ al to th e h eightof th e steep slope or 50 fe et, whicheveris greater (see ECD C 23.80.070 A.1)(The buffer sh own is the minimum bufferadjacent to the North Edmonds Subsiden ceand Landsli de Hazard Area; a simil arbuffer wo uld appl y to steep slope area s, but is not show n o n this map for clarity) D R A F T Packet Page 409 of 433 Packet Page 410 of 433 Packet Page 411 of 433 AM-893 7. Old Woodway Elementary ILA Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Linda Carl, Mayor's Office Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:5 Minutes Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Ratify Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Snohomish County, City of Edmonds, and Edmonds School District #15 regarding Termination of Previously Executed Interlocal Agreement, and Ratify Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Snohomish County and the City of Edmonds for Assistance in the Acquisition of All or Part of the Old Woodway Elementary Site. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Ratify the termination of the previously executed Interlocal Agreement and ratify the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Snohomish County for funding assistance. Previous Council Action On May 18, 1999, the City Council authorized the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County and Edmonds School District 15 for the Old Woodway Elementary School. Narrative In a recent Council meeting, a citizen brought up several questions regarding the termination of the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with the County and the school district. City Attorney Scott Snyder prepared a memo to address those concerns. Mr. Snyder's memo, as well as the original ILA with the County and school district, are attached as Exhibit A. A chronological timeline associated with the preparation and signing of the two ILAs being considered by the Council to be ratified was prepared by Sandy Chase, City Clerk, and is attached as Exhibit B. The termination of the previously executed ILA is attached as Exhibit C, and the funding assistance ILA is attached as Exhibit D. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit A - City Attorney Memo Link: Exhibit B - City Clerk Memo Link: Exhibit C - Termination ILA Link: Exhibit D - Funding Assistance ILA Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 08:39 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/16/2007 08:43 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 08:51 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl Started On: 03/15/2007 02:41 PM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 412 of 433 Packet Page 413 of 433 Packet Page 414 of 433 Packet Page 415 of 433 Packet Page 416 of 433 Packet Page 417 of 433 Packet Page 418 of 433 Packet Page 419 of 433 Packet Page 420 of 433 Packet Page 421 of 433 Packet Page 422 of 433 City of Edmonds W City Clerk’s Office Date: March 16, 2007 To: Mayor Haakenson Council President Pritchard Olson City Council From: Sandy Chase, City Clerk Subject: Interlocal Agreements: (1) Termination of Previously Executed Interlocal Agreement, and (2) Assistance in the Acquisition of All or Part of the Old Woodway Elementary Site Below is information associated with the preparation and signing of the above-referenced Interlocal Agreements. • November 15, 2006 – Both Interlocal Agreements were signed by Snohomish County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney. (Note: The agreements were prepared by the County.) • November 16, 2006 – Mayor Haakenson signed both documents on behalf of the City of Edmonds. • November 16, 2006 – Superintendent Dr. Nick Brossoit signed the Termination of Previously Executed Interlocal Agreement on behalf of Edmonds School District. • December 18, 2006 – County Executive Aaron Reardon signed both documents on behalf of Snohomish County. (Note: The County passed motions authorizing signature on December 13, 2006.) • December 21, 2006 – A draft “Addendum and Release to Interlocal” was received via email from Scott Snyder, City Attorney. The email was received by Mayor Haakenson, Parks and Recreation Director Brian McIntosh and City Clerk Sandy Chase. (Note: This document was not signed or processed pending further direction.) • January 18, 2007 – Colin Southcote-Want submitted a Request for Public Records to obtain copies of any documents pertaining to a termination agreement. The City Clerk’s Office researched and was unable to find in the city files a signed termination document. Through further research, Linda Hynd, Deputy City Clerk, contacted Snohomish County to determine if the County was aware of a termination agreement and requested copies. • February 2, 2007 – Fully signed copies of the two Interlocal Agreements were received by the City Clerk’s Office from Marc Krandel, Park Planning Supervisor, Snohomish County Parks. MEMORANDUM Packet Page 423 of 433 Packet Page 424 of 433 Packet Page 425 of 433 Packet Page 426 of 433 Packet Page 427 of 433 Packet Page 428 of 433 Packet Page 429 of 433 AM-892 9. Committee Meeting Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/20/2007 Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:15 Minutes Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subject Title Report on City Council Committee Meetings. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The following Committee Meeting Minutes are attached: 1. Finance Committee (3/13/07) 2. Public Safety Committee (3/13/07) Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Finance Comm Minutes Link: Public Safety Comm Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/15/2007 10:14 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/15/2007 10:24 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/16/2007 07:09 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 03/15/2007 10:13 AM Final Approval Date: 03/16/2007 Packet Page 430 of 433 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES March 13, 2007 6:00 PM V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\2007 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES\FINANCE - 070313.DOC Present: Councilmember Ron Wambolt Councilmember Dave Orvis Staff: Kathleen Junglov Deb Sharp Committee Chair Orvis called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Item A: Surplus of computer monitors and donation to Interconnection. Kathleen briefly reviewed the benefits of surplusing and donating items to Interconnection. Committee members approved forwarding this item to full Council as a consent agenda item. Item B: Discussion regarding legal services. After a brief discussion on legal services, the Committee requested Finance perform an analysis of the cost benefit using inside vs. outside legal services. Item C: 220th Street Project. The Committee next discussed the 220th Street Project. It was the Committee’s consensus to have Finance staff prepare a schedule showing original budget, amendments, and final costs. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 PM. Packet Page 431 of 433 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting March 13, 2007 Committee Members Present: Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Chair Councilmember Michael Plunkett Staff Present: Chief of Police David Stern Assistant Chief of Police Al Compaan Assistant Chief of Police Gerry Gannon Guests: Mayor Gary Haakenson Bio Park, City Attorney’s Office Reporter from the Beacon One audience members The meeting was called to order at 1810 hours. A. Continued discussion regarding graffiti in the city and enacting an anti-graffiti ordinance. Previously Chief Stern presented an overview of the issue indicating that there was evidence of two distinct types of graffiti in the community. Those types being the so called art form placed by taggers and a small amount of gang related material. It was noted that existing enforcement is conducted under the malicious mischief provisions of code and is adequate for the purpose. Removal of graffiti is done in part by the city and in part by property owners depending on who owns the property in question. Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.110.030 specifies that graffiti is a nuisance on private property and must be removed by the owner but does not specify a time frame. Previous discussion of several options, included adding code to make it a crime to possess, purchase or furnish implements used to produce graffiti and formalizing abatement procedures. It was agreed that a time factor needed to be added to the existing code. Chair Dawson invited Bio Park from the City Attorney’s Office to present their view of legal issues involved in some of the options previously discussed. Mr. Park mentioned the use of public funds to remove graffiti on private property as a potential obstacle which could be avoided by use of monies recovered from suspects. Mr. Park also noted that for City personnel to enter private property for abatement purposes a warrant from superior court would be needed. Mr. Park also discussed the differences between burden of proof and affirmative defense issues relating to possession of graffiti implements and recommended the latter. The final issue dealt with service by certified mail in abatement cases as an acceptable method. It was determined by the Council members that a broad range of options should be presented to the full Council in a public hearing format to allow for citizen input. Chief Stern and Chair Dawson will collaborate on a presentation Packet Page 432 of 433 Action: On March 13, 2007 the Public Safety Committee met. Continued discussion was held regarding enacting an anti-graffiti ordinance. It was agreed by the committee that a broad range of options be presented to the full Council in a public hearing format to allow for citizen input. Chair Person Dawson and Police Chief David Stern will collaborate on a presentation. This item will be placed on the City Council Agenda for a public hearing on a date to be determined. Meeting adjourned at 1834 hours. Packet Page 433 of 433