Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2007.03.27 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA Edmonds City Council Meeting Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds March 27, 2007 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. Call to Order and Flag Salute 1• Approval of Agenda 2• Consent Agenda Items A. Roll Call B. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2007. C. Approval of claim checks #95004 through #95183 for March 22, 2007 in the amount of $833,409.80. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44617 through #44669 for the period of March 1 through March 15, 2007 in the amount of $909,024.34. D. Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Carol Franklin (amount undetermined) and Timothy Cipolla (amount undetermined). E. Report on final construction costs for the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Improvements project and Council acceptance of project. F. Authorization to call for bids for the 2007 Street Overlay program. G. Authorization to call for bids for the abatement and demolition of the Old Woodway Elementary School located at 23700 104th Avenue West. H. Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects for consulting services for Old Woodway Elementary School Park Master Planning, Design, and Construction Administration Services. 1• Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with Hough Beck & Baird Inc. for consulting services to Update the Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. J. Report on final project and construction for the City Building Energy Improvements - Phase I and Council acceptance of project. K. Proposed Ordinance adopting a new Subsection D into Edmonds City Code 8.51.020 defining temporary employee parking permit; adding a new Section 8.51.042 to Chapter 8.51 ECC entitled Temporary Emplovee Parking Permit - Validation Required. 3• (5 Min) Proclamation in honor of Boys & Girls Club Week, March 25 - 31, 2007. 4. (20 Annual Report from the Snohomish County Tourism Bureau. Min) 5. (15 Report from the Community Technology Advisory Committee. Min) 6. (60 Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Chapter 5.05 of the Edmonds City Code relating to Animal Min) Control. 7. Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 1 of 202 g. (15 Min) Individual Council reports on outside committee/board meetings. g_ (5 Min) Mayor's Comments 10. (15 Min) Council Comments 11. Adjourn AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 2 of 202 AM-903 Approval of Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting 2.13. Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative A copy of the draft March 20, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes is attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Draft Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Inbox Approved By Seq 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 3 Final Sandy Chase Approval Form Started By: Sandy Chase Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Date Status 03/22/2007 08:24 AM APRV 03/22/2007 08:27 AM APRV 03/22/2007 08:28 AM APRV Started On: 03/22/2007 08:22 AM Packet Page 3 of 202 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES March 20, 2007 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5tn Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dave Gebert, City Engineer Jeannine Graf, Building Official Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder Mayor Haakenson relayed Council President Olson's request to move Item 3 (Historical Report on Term Limits) to Item 8A and Audience Comments to Item 8B. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Marin requested Item E be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 6, 2007. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #94672 THROUGH #94851 FOR MARCH 8, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $476,953.46. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #94852 THROUGH #95003 FOR MARCH 15, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $257,341.46. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 1 Packet Page 4 of 202 D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM FRANK TSERING DEGOTSANG (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), ROSEANN WILSON (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), MARK AND SHERRI JOHNSON ($929.94), RICHARD AND KATHLEEN GLASSBURN (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND MARILYN G. WALKER ($87.04). F. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE METER A REHABILITATION PROJECT AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT. G. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE 2006 CITYWIDE STORM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT. H. SURPLUS OF COMPUTER MONITORS AND DONATION TO INTERCONNECTION. I. AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS TO PURCHASE ONE (1) NEW 2007 CHEVROLET 2500 4X4 SUBURBAN FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,616.21 INCLUDING WASHINGTON STATE SALES TAX. ITEM E: APPROVAL OF LIST OF BUSINESSES APPLYING FOR RENEWAL OF THEIR LIQUOR LICENSES WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, JANUARY - MARCH 2O07 Councilmember Marin advised he pulled this item in order to abstain from the vote. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER MARIN ABSTAINED. 4. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A SIGN CODE AMENDMENT TO CLARIFY LANGUAGE ADDRESSING COMMUNITY EVENT BANNER SITES ON CITY -OWNED PROPERTY. Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh explained for several years the community has expressed interest in additional locations for overhead banners to advertise special events. There are currently two locations — Caspers and 5th Avenue South. There were previously five locations but three were removed due to problems with distances and power lines. The need for additional sites is included in the Community Cultural Plan and the Streetscape Plan elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff has identified a new site for installing pole mounted community event banners at the Public Works property on the north side of 212th Street. Installation of the poles has been delayed because the current Sign Code language does not address this special situation where the poles are located on City property. The issue was presented to the Council Community/Development Services Committee in November 2006 and the Committee directed staff to develop a code amendment to allow the construction of the proposed sign site. On January 24, 2007 the Planning Board reviewed the proposed ordinance amending the language and held a public hearing on February 14, 2007 where it was recommended to City Council. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of the public who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing. Council President Olson commented the banners were very helpful for advertising community events such as the Library Book Sale and she was glad that a third site had been identified. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SIGN CODE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 5 of 202 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2007-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene presented the 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), explaining the CIP was a long range planning tool and a requirement of the State Growth Management Act. Most of the capital improvements in each fund were derived from the Comprehensive Plan. He briefly reviewed a summary of the capital project funds. He advised a project description booklet would be available in April via the internet that detailed each of the projects, project costs, and funding. He displayed and reviewed a sample project description for the Interurban Trail. Mr. Fiene explained Fund 112 (Transportation) and Fund 125 (REET-2 Transportation) financed a wide variety of projects including street overlays, road improvements/widening, traffic signals, road stabilization, traffic calming, bikeways and walkways. He reviewed sample projects including citywide overlays and the Caspers/9th Avenue/Puget Drive walkway. Mr. Fiene advised funding for transportation capital was improved from a year ago due to the Council's allocation beginning in 2006 of REET-2 funds over $750,000 for transportation. A total of $1.43 million was collected in REET-2 in 2006, leaving $680,000 for transportation projects. There are some concerns with the 112 and 125 Funds, including the loss of $75,000 in MVFT in 2006, $150,000 in 2007 and $150,000 in 2008 to help the General Fund. If this continued beyond 2008, the City could slip from a 33- year overlay cycle to a 40-year cycle. The proposed CIP assumes $150,000 was restored to Fund 112 after 2008. He noted allocating Olympic View franchise fees to the transportation capital fund rather than the General Fund could assist with overlaying Olympic View area streets impacted by Olympic View Water District projects. Mr. Fiene explained Fund 113 (Multimodal Transportation) provided funds for the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation project that would link ferry, bus, pedestrian, bicycle, ridesharing and trains at the Pt. Edwards site. Fund 116 (Building Maintenance) funds maintenance of City buildings. He displayed sample projects in Fund 116 that include the Senior Center, City Hall, Frances Anderson Center and other City buildings. Fund 116 is currently financed by the General Fund which has been impacted by I-747 and I-695. Funding was currently budgeted through 2008; funding for 2009 and beyond was a concern and lack of funding could defer building maintenance. Mr. Fiene stated Fund 125 (BEET 2 Parks Improvement) and 132 (Park Construction -Grant Funding) funded a variety of parks, open space, recreation, and beautification projects in City parks as well as trails, pool improvements and waterfront improvements. Sample projects include the skate park at the Civic Center and citywide beautification projects. Fund 126 (Parks Acquisition) funds land acquisition. Sample projects include waterfront property acquisition. Fund 129 (Special Projects) funds SR99 International District enhancements to visually brand the area between 224th and 238th Streets. With regard to the combined 412 Funds (Water, Storm and Sewer), Mr. Fiene explained a rate study was conducted recently that determined minor increases were necessary over the next several years. He explained projects in Fund 412-100 (Water) were identified in the approved 2002 Water Comprehensive Plan; Comprehensive Plan priorities include improving fireflow, replacing deteriorating pipes, replacing 1% of City pipes per year, and storage and control improvements. He displayed sample projects including water line replacement/improvements in Perrinville and College Place. Mr. Fiene explained projects in Fund 412-200 (Storm) were identified in the 2003 Stormwater Comprehensive Plan; projects address capacity problems, maintenance problems and environmental concerns. He displayed sample storm projects including pipe replacement in the North Stream area and southwest Edmonds projects. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 6 of 202 Projects in Fund 412-300 (Sewer) were identified in the 2006 Comprehensive; priorities include maintenance issues, environmental issues and capacity problems. Examples of sewer projects include the rehabilitation/replacement of Lift Stations 7 & 8 and 7th Avenue North sewer main line project. Fund 414 (Wastewater Treatment Plant) funds projects in the wastewater treatment plant including flow meters, outfall lines, and influent trunk lines. He displayed a sample project of the bar screen replacement. Mr. Fiene summarized Fund 116 continued to rely heavily on grants to meet project needs. The Public Works Director's proposal to draw additional funds from the General Fund in 2010-2013 will assist if approved by the City Council. Other funds appear to be meeting minimum needs. Staff recommends and encourages comments and feedback from Council and the public at the public hearing and recommends the Council direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance adopting the updated Capital Facilities Plan. Councilmember Wambolt referred to funds for the 100th Avenue Road Stabilization, inquiring what portion of 100th. Mr. Fiene answered it was in the Firdale Area. Councilmember Wambolt inquired about the $100,000 allocation for 220th Street improvements. Mr. Fiene answered the funds were to complete punchlist items and make final payments. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether the proposed CIP included street lighting on Main between 6th and 7th. Mr. Fiene answered there was $75,000 identified in Fund 112 in 2008. Councilmember Plunkett inquired about transportation funds from REET-2. Mr. Fiene explained the total collected in 2006 was $1.43 million, less $750,000 provided $680,000 for transportation. He advised 2007 funds would not be available until REET-2 exceeded $750,000. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the 2006 funds were allocated. Mr. Fiene advised they were allocated in Fund 125 Transportation Fund. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Duane Farmen, Edmonds, representing 100 property owners in the Seaview/Perrinville area, explained they initially organized to limit the impacts of the Anglers Crossing PRD in their neighborhood and following approval of that project, changed their focus to traffic safety. He noted the CIP contained $150,000 in 2013 for improvements to 80th Avenue West; his request was to move that funding forward. He explained the sight distance improvement would regrade the 80th Avenue hill north of the intersection of 184th West & 80th Avenue. He noted this section was short, steep (12% grade) and had numerous blind spots. He noted an increase in vehicle and pedestrian traffic in recent years and anticipated it would increase further upon completion of Anglers Crossing. He anticipated 30-35 additional children in that development walking to the elementary school, bus stop and park. He reviewed the accident history including the most recent accident in May and provided photographs of an accident. He displayed several photographs of the hill illustrating the sight distance issues and a projected regrade of the hill. Mr. Farmen summarized the reason the neighborhood wanted the project moved up on the CIP was the hill posed a serious traffic hazard, safety should qualify it as a high priority, $220,000 was available for the project from the sale of City property and impact fees, the McNaughton Group agreed to move their sidewalk from the east side of 80th to the west side, and McNaughton Group will do the surveying. Councilmember Orvis referred to the Public Works' drawing of the existing hill and his projection of the regrade, inquiring whether the intent was to increase sight distance to the intersection at the bottom of the hill. Mr. Farmen agreed that was the intent. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 7 of 202 Brian Furby, Edmonds, commented the primary issue with 80th Avenue West was safety for the property owners on the street as well as drivers using the street. He referred to the increased danger during recent icy conditions particularly for pedestrians. The approval of the Anglers Crossing PRD will result in increased traffic as well as more school children walking to the school, bus stop and park. He described the May 2007 accident where teens racing in the left and right lanes struck a car traveling in the opposite direction. He commented on the difficulty the limited sight distance posed for property owners accessing 80th. He concurred with Mr. Farman's proposal to move up the project to reduce the cap of 80th Bill Rankin, Edmonds, echoed the need for street improvements on 8e, at least road grading to improve safety. He recalled during the planning of the Anglers Crossing PRD, staff compared it to Madrona Cove PRD at Five Corners. He pointed out several differences: Main Street was twice as wide as 80tt', Main Street had sidewalks on both sides, and there were no steep grades or sight distance limitations on Main Street. He pointed out the proximity of the street to Seaview Park and the County Park and lack of sidewalks linking the neighborhood to the parks. He urged the Council to mitigate this liability, noting it made sense to do it now when the PRD was being developed. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, stated he had been critical in the past of the City not applying for grant funding. He was surprised an approximately $400,000 grant was received for the Caspers/Puget Drive walkway which has a total project cost of $590,000. He referred to requests for critical items, suggesting it may be appropriate to move funds to other projects. Acknowledging he was not aware of the funding source of the Caspers/Puget Drive walkway, he noted approximately $200,000 in REET funds were also allocated to that project that could be reallocated to other more important projects. He suggested the project list be reevaluated and funds moved to other projects. He asked the source of the grant for the Caspers/Puget Drive walkway. He referred to $945,000 allocated for 76th/75th Place walkway, suggesting there may be grant funds available for that project due to safety issues and walkway to schools. Don Kreiman, Edmonds, Chair of the Citizens Advisory Transportation Committee, commented the CIP looked better this year and included funds for sidewalks and overlays. He thanked the Council for identifying funds for infrastructure that would increase safety. He advised the grant for the walkway referred to by Mr. Hertrich was Safe Routes to Schools. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, referred to legislative bills regarding the GMA and making property owners responsible for the maintenance of streets and sidewalks. He urged the City to investigate these bills. Rick Spellman, Edmonds, resident of Shell Park 21 also known as "the hill," referred to funding in Fund 125 in 2009 for a secondary ingress/egress to Shell Park 2. On behalf of Shell Park 2 residents, he urged the City to continue funding for that project. Roland Brown, Edmonds, described the hazards encountered while walking his dog on the treacherous, steep hill on 80th, echoing the need for improvements on 80th. John Pierce, Edmonds, referred to information provided to the Council regarding the intersection of 196th & 88th He described the difficulty drivers experience turning or crossing that intersection due to sight distance issues. He urged Council to drive northbound on 88th Avenue NW and try to cross the intersection at 196th, anticipating they would find it very dangerous, likely the most dangerous intersection in Edmonds. He suggested the City at least consider a 4-way stop as an interim measure. Frank Johnson, Edmonds, a resident near the intersection of 196th & 88th explained when accidents occurred on 88th, the property owner on the corner called the police and he offered assistance to the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 8 of 202 accident victims. He commented there had been numerous accidents at the intersection over the past 50 years. He suggested timing the light at the bottom of the hill at 76th to provide a break in the traffic. Lynn Russell, Edmonds, a resident near the intersection of 196th & 88tb, advised many school buses crossed this intersection daily. She described the difficulty crossing or turning at the intersection and urged the Council to experience the intersection. Warren Koons, Edmonds, referred to a letter he provided to the Council. He commented on several near misses at the intersection of 196th & 88th, advising he tries to avoid the intersection because of the dangers it posed. He urged the Council to consider some improvement. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing. Councilmember Wambolt referred to Mr. Kreiman's comments, pointing out funds for Fund 125 transportation were provided via REET-2 funds in excess of $750,000 as a result of home sales. He commented it was possible the funds available would be less in 2007 if real estate sales were down. He referred to $150,000 allocated in 2013 for 88th Avenue street improvement, asking the ramification of delaying the Interurban Trail improvements to fund that project. Mr. Fiene answered there were grants associated with the Interurban Trail project and it was a regional link. He agreed the 196th & 88th intersection was dangerous, however, there was limited accident history, possibly because people avoid the intersection. He referred to the Comprehensive Plan process that identified the projects that were then considered and prioritized. Councilmember Marin expressed interest in moving up the sight distance improvement on 80th Avenue West. He asked if there would be time to identify funding if that project were moved to 2010. Mr. Fiene answered the Council could reprioritize projects; the proposed CIP was staff s recommendation based on the Comprehensive Plan. He noted moving that project forward could require delaying another projects. Councilmember Orvis advised the funds from the land sale associated with Anglers Crossing would be placed in the General Fund and were currently unallocated. He suggested allocating those funds to the 80th Avenue West project. Councilmember Dawson asked the cost of the 80th Avenue West project. Mr. Fiene answered that project was only recently identified and had not been analyzed fully to provide a good cost estimate. He noted the citizen activism associated with Anglers Crossing highlighted the existing problem which currently was addressed via a sign warning of the limited sight distance. Councilmember Dawson suggested the funds from the land sale could be used to assist with funding that project. Further, the project could be done in association with other work being done in the area. Mr. Fiene advised the 80th Avenue West project was analyzed in the Comprehensive Plan as a low Priority 1 project and was awaiting funding behind other Priority 1 projects, scheduled for funding in 2013. He agreed it was a worthwhile project as it linked Seaview Park, Olympic View Drive and Southwest County Park. He commented on sight distance issues at 80th and 180th For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Fiene advised if it was the Council's desire to move up the 80th Avenue West improvements, Council should direct staff to reprioritize the projects and analyze what projects could be delayed. City Engineer Dave Gebert explained the capital budget was already adopted for 2007 and 2008. If the project was moved up to 2007 or 2008, a budget amendment would be required. Councilmember Dawson explained she used the 196th/88th intersection twice a day and agreed it was very difficult. She asked when it had last been analyzed, commenting it appeared to be getting worse. Mr. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 6 Packet Page 9 of 202 Fiene offered to report back to the Council on the analysis. He explained that intersection was not as high a priority as other signal projects. He recalled the Traffic Engineer suggested it be an intersection improvement project which would include consideration of options. Councilmember Dawson asked what direction from Council would be required to make improvements to that intersection sooner. Mr. Fiene answered staff could be directed to do a study of the intersection that considered accident data, issues, etc. Councilmember Dawson commented the accident data may not accurately reflect how unusual the intersection is. If the Council wanted to move up that project, Mr. Gebert recommended hiring a consultant to analyze the situation and develop preliminary concepts to be used to obtain grant funds. That effort would identify the best solutions, preliminary costs and funding sources. He commented that was the approach used for the 76th Avenue intersection which was the top priority in the Hwy. 99 study. Councilmember Dawson asked the cost of a consultant to do an analysis. Mr. Gebert estimated $50,000 to gather traffic counts, traffic data, and analyze options. Councilmember Dawson asked the cost of a 4- way stop. Mr. Gebert was uncertain whether a 4-way stop would be allowed as the intersection may not meet the warrants and because it was WSDOT route, WSDOT may not allow a 4-way stop. Councilmember Dawson asked about the suggestion to time the light at 76th to provide a better gap. Mr. Fiene agreed that could be considered. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the $10,000 allocated in 2013 for 88th/196th was to study that intersection, noting that was less than Mr. Gebert's $50,000 estimate. Mr. Gebert agreed the cost of a study was unknown, that funding was a placeholder. Councilmember Marin suggested if the 80th Avenue West sight distance project were moved up, it would be appropriate to include a study in 2008/2009 in anticipation of a project in 2010. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE FOR COUNCIL CONSENT APPROVAL ADOPTING THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AS PART OF THE CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE A PLANNING STUDY IN 2008/2009 FOR THE 80TH AVENUE SIGHT DISTANCE AND THE PROJECT IN 2010. Councilmember Dawson preferred the Council direct staff to return with more information as it may be more appropriate to do those improvements at the time Anglers Crossing is constructed. She suggested staff be directed to return with further information and move the project up as appropriate. Councilmember Marin agreed. Mayor Haakenson suggested Councilmember Marin remove the years from his motion; Councilmember Marin and Councilmember Wambolt agreed. Councilmember Marin acknowledged it may be necessary to amend the 2007/2008 budget. Councilmember Orvis supported the use of the funds from the land sale and preferred not to impact the projects currently identified in the CIP such as the Shell Valley project. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 7 Packet Page 10 of 202 Councilmember Plunkett agreed navigating the intersection of 88th & 196th was difficult, recalling his high school class lost two members as a result of an accident at that intersection. He suggested increasing the funds for a study in 2013 and to move that project forward. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO TAKE $20,000 FROM ENDING CASH BALANCE AND MOVE THE STUDY OF THE INTERSECTION OF 88TH & 196TH INTO 2007 TO BEGIN THAT WORK. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 19.10 DEALING WITH DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE EARTH SUBSIDENCE LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA OF NORTH EDMONDS. THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES AN UPDATED LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA MAP. Development Services Director Duane Bowman relayed staff and the Mayor's recommendation to adopt the proposed ordinance which amends Chapter 19.10 of the ECDC and adopts a new landslide hazard map. He referred to the steps in the process that culminated in the October 9, 2006 meeting staff held with the community to provide an update on the Lidar mapping and introduce the new landslide hazard map. At that meeting several citizens commented on excessive peer review times and fees. After reviewing the existing policies that allow a range of different peer review consultants with Building Official Jeannine Graf and Mayor Haakenson, he recommended a new policy that allows for one peer review consultant, and defines peer reviews timelines, costs, initial completeness review and times for response. This would provide more predictability to the process and to the timelines. He noted face-to- face meetings between the applicant and the peer review consultant would be paid for by the consultant. He displayed the updated North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area Map prepared by Landau Associates, explaining the previous map was hand -drawn, making it difficult to determine whether properties were inside or outside the landslide hazard area. This map was prepared using Lidar technology and analysis by Landau Associates to clearly define the Earth subsidence Landslide Hazard Area. He pointed out the critical area buffer of the landslide hazard area. Dennis Stettler, Landau Associates, provided background on the landslide hazard area, explaining in 2004 the City updated the Critical Areas Ordinance defining landslide hazards. He explained landslide hazards were in two categories, 1) North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area, and 2) any steep slope with a 40% of greater slope with a height of 10 feet or more. The second category applied anywhere in the City; the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area was unique to that area. He explained this analysis began due to concerns with the base mapping and the technical basis for the landslide hazard area and associated buffers. He explained the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area was a unique area, a large ancient landslide with some similarity to the Perkins Lane slide area in Seattle where landslide activity has occurred. Commonalities between these areas include a sand layer over a clay layer with groundwater between that given the right conditions can result in landslides. He explained the first landslides occurred in the area 12,000 years ago. The North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area is 3,300 feet long parallel to the shoreline and 600-900 feet wide. He provided a history of landslide events including an 800 foot wide landslide in 1947 that destroyed four homes and damaged several others. There were also landslides in the winters of 1953-1954, 1955-1956, during the early 1960s, and in 1971 as well as numerous smaller landslides. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 8 Packet Page 11 of 202 Mr. Stettler explained in 1979 the City imposed a moratorium on any building in this area. A study commissioned in 1979 to consider the landslide hazard concluded the risk of landslide in some areas was as high as 90% probability in a 25-year period as a result of groundwater instability. In 1984 the City implemented a Local Improvement District that installed sewers and drainage improvements that had the benefit of lowering the ground water table and improving the overall stability of the area. Another study commissioned in 1985 concluded the risk of landslide in some areas was as high as 30% probability in a 25-year period. A definition of stable was developed that stated for purposes of development in that area stable would be 30% probability or less of a landslide in a 25-year period. The moratorium was lifted in 1988 via an ordinance enacting Chapter 19.10 that detailed the process to address development in the landslide hazard area, identify the risk, required appropriate development measures be taken and ensure all parties were informed of the risk. He described concerns with the previous map including that the base map was not very accurate, it was difficult to identify existing features, and the inclusion of areas that had already failed as well as an interpretation of areas that had not failed yet but could in the future. He noted upon further analysis, there were areas inside that boundary with lower risk and areas outside the boundary with a higher risk. To address those issues, Mr. Stettler explained the City had Lidar imaging flown in 2005. He described the Lidar mapping process. The City then hired Landau Associates to utilize the Lidar information and further apply it to landslide and slope stability assessments. He described the accuracy of Lidar mapping, development of contour internals for the entire City and further processing with the steep slope criteria. He displayed and reviewed a map of the City illustrating steep slope areas. He clarified this was intended as a screening tool and not to take the place of a ground survey. He described ground checks of the areas identified as steep slopes. Mr. Stettler explained the same process was used to analyze slopes in the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area. Using Lidar information, aerial photographs and studies conducted in the past, a boundary was selected as the area that had previously failed, explaining the area that had previously failed was clearly defensible and not subject to interpretation. With regard to adjacent areas, he acknowledged they posed some risk but were already covered by the landslide hazard provisions in the Critical Areas Ordinance. Each steep slope area, including the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area, had a 50-foot buffer. He clarified development was not prohibited in the buffer, geotechnical evaluation was required. Mr. Stettler summarized the landslide hazard area map was developed for the entire city and specifically the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area using Best Available Science (BAS) and incorporating technology as well as historical information. The areas adjacent to the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area were addressed by the Critical Areas Ordinance. He suggested the geotechnical summary of the North Edmonds Area be available to property owners and developers as a reference document. Building Official Jeannine Graf reviewed proposed administrative changes to the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard provisions of ECDC 19.10: • Eliminate the architect stamp on building plans. • Extend application and permit timelines, currently 180 days. Due to limitations on ground work between October and April, staff proposes to extend applications for an additional seven months and extend building permits from one year to two years upon issuance. • Require the vicinity map show greater detail of adjacent hazards within 100 feet. • During October 1 — April 30, require contractors report temporary erosion control inspections, require after -storm event inspections (following a storm of 1 inch of rain in a 24-hour period, the applicant's geotechnical engineer must make a site visit within 48 hours and recommend any site Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 9 Packet Page 12 of 202 stabilization and confirm erosion control and provide a report within one week of the event), and create provisions for seasonal groundwork extensions. Eliminate mapped percentages from map and adopt the hazard zone approach for mitigation that requires the geotechnical engineer of record to analyze site -specific hazards and design to reduce the hazard and mitigate the impact. Restrict rockeries, swimming poles, hot tubs, ponds, watering or irrigation systems and stockpile fill on the top and bottom of slopes. Establish a procedure for property owners to request a waiver upon written analysis by a geotechnical engineer that proposed rockery, etc. would have no reasonable likelihood of contributing to any landslide threat. Ms. Graf provided responses to questions posed in a letter from Lin Hillman prior to the November 2006 Community/Development Services Committee meeting: Why require the adopted map to be To ensure the project site is notated on the adopted submitted with the permit application? Landslide Hazard Map to provide future owners easy access to the map that delineates the site of the known landslide hazard area. Why is the applicant required to have a To ensure the geotechnical engineer has real data to study. topographic survey completed prior to studies and evaluations by the geotechnical engineer? When are architectural plans required to be Architectural plans would only be required to be stamped stamped? if they contained structural details. Why is peer review required of non- Since 1988 it has been the City's policy to have a technical issues? professional engineering firm review plans for coordination between the geotechnical report and the foundation as well as all structural loads. Recommendation to change the process to This process did not prove successful when used for allow geotechnical peer review approval critical area determination as submittal information was prior to design of foundation systems and too general and preliminary and not enough specific ahead of permit submittal to the City. details or investigation was performed. Councilmember Plunkett asked why the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Hazard Area was different. Mr. Stettler the size of this area as well as significant movement in recent times made it different from other steep slope areas in the City. Councilmember Plunkett referred to Section 19.10.060 regarding peer review, noting in addition to a geotechnical engineer, review by an architect and structural engineer may be required. Ms. Graf agreed "architect" should be deleted from that section; however, reference to the structural engineer peer review should be retained. Councilmember Plunkett referred to the suggestion for the applicant to do peer review upfront and asked why that option was not appropriate. Mr. Graf answered the Planning Division tried that process in the past with pre-2005 critical area studies and determinations and found there was not enough detail provided to warrant a good decision. Councilmember Plunkett suggested the applicant be informed of the required information. Ms. Graf agreed that would be possible, explaining it was unlikely to save an applicant time. She explained the peer review time would be shortened due to the Development Director's policy for a 30 day initial review which was only 10 days longer than was quoted for a single family home citywide. City Attorney Scott Snyder pointed out the difficulty was these were custom homes on difficult sites and few proceeded through the process without any changes. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 10 Packet Page 13 of 202 Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Alice Oates, Edmonds, asked whether the extension of the building permit was for the plan check review fee and the building permit fee. Ms. Graf explained the proposal was that a building permit would be good for two years upon issuance; if it needed to be renewed for a third year, the cost was half the permit fee. Ms. Oates explained they were in the plan review phase and need to have all the documentation submitted for review. They went through peer review and were currently on their third submittal. When they paid their plan fee, they did not realize their plan review was only good for one year as staff informed them the average process time to obtain permits in the landslide hazard area was 18+ months, yet the permit was only good for one year. She advised their first submittal took 45 days, they encountered problems with their peer review, requiring a second 45 day peer review and now when they received comments for the third time they would be ten months into the process. In addition, Engineering informed them they would be required to do a SEPA review which is at least a two month process. She recommended the plan review time period also be extended. Ms. Graf explained staff s proposal was to allow applications to be extended an additional seven months if the issuance of the permit was hampered by the winter season. She agreed in the past the City quoted 12-18 months for a landslide hazard permit. That timeframe included the City's processing time and the average time for the applicant to respond. As a result of public comments, the Director changed the policy to only quote City time — 65 days for initial City review, 30 days for the second review and 20 days for the third review. She acknowledged that did not reflect the true time for an applicant to obtain a permit but staff only tracked the City time. Ms. Graf clarified under the current ordinance, the Oates' application was good for 180 days; they could make a written request to extend for an additional 180 days. At the end of one year, the application would expire. In order to file a new application, they would be required to pay all new plan review fees. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, recalled difficulties the Hearing Examiner experienced with the existing landslide hazard map in determining whether properties were within the landslide hazard area. He referred to legislative bills regarding GMA, commenting the City may qualify for grants for landslide hazard areas. He expressed concern with the amount of time the process took. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented the Lidar map identified every drop-off in the City. He feared identification of a slope on a Lidar map would require extra regulation even if it was outside the landslide hazard area. He referred to Ms. Oates' experience with the City process, commenting the difficulty was different staff members had different perspectives and opinions. He stated the changes proposed by staff were extensive and warranted additional study. He suggested contractors/builders/architects be provided an opportunity to provide input regarding the proposed regulations. He objected to the requirement for a geotechnical site visit following a 1-inch rainstorm, commenting if drainage systems were appropriately designed and inspected, there would not be landslide hazards. He concluded the proposed ordinance was a good effort but required further study and consideration of the impacts on the development community. Lin Hillman, Edmonds, commented this process was a good opportunity for public input. She recalled being in a similar position to the Oates when they built their home. She found many of the proposed changes were significant improvements over the existing regulations as well as over the last draft. She suggested upfront peer review as an option. She agreed with the proposal for a single peer review consultant. She summarized if the initial submittal included peer review approval, a project in any area could be reviewed within normal permit times. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 11 Packet Page 14 of 202 COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, MOVED TO EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR 15 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Moore observed the ordinance could be amended in the future. She suggested a staff report and public feedback in a year regarding how the process was working. In response to Mr. Hertrich, Mr. Snyder explained the regulations that were being amended had been in place for 20 years. The proposed changes which have been under review since 2004 were intended to ease the process for the applicant, reduce the cost, reduce the time and were in a large part based on public feedback and BAS. He noted BAS was a moving target and staff would respond with changes as information was received. In response to Ms. Oates, Mr. Bowman suggested the plan review time be changed from 180 days to one year with the right to request a written extension with no fee. He agreed the ordinance could be changed at any time and staff could report to the Council in a year with regard to how the process worked. He offered to give further consideration to Ms. Hillman's suggestion for upfront peer review. Councilmember Plunkett commented if there was an option for upfront peer review, the applicant would be taking the risk of additional peer review. Mr. Bowman answered this was a sensitive area and there were numerous issues to be considered during plan review including the geological conditions, structure design, etc. He offered to consider Ms. Hillman's suggestion for upfront peer review but could not at this point promise it would work. Councilmember Plunkett asked who would be burdened by upfront peer review. Mr. Bowman answered if insufficient information were provided, the applicant could pay twice. The burden on the City was the potential of a double review. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO.3632. Councilmember Marin commented during his tenure on the Sound Transit Board, he had opportunity to talk with numerous Civil and Geotechnical Engineers, noting there was potential for a great deal of risk with development in landslide hazard areas. He advised the proposed changes would address health, safety and welfare as well as life and property safety issues. It was the consensus of the Council to include extending plan review from 180 days to one year and remove "architect" from Section 19.10.060. Council President Olson spoke in favor of the ordinance, finding it a great improvement. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess. 7. RATIFY INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, CITY OF EDMONDS, AND EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 REGARDING TERMINATION OF PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, AND RATIFY INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE ACQUISITION OF ALL OR PART OF THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SITE. Mayor Haakenson explained he took the Council's will to purchase 5.5 acres at the old Woodway Elementary School site as his authorization to release the Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County and sign an Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County which provides for Snohomish County to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 12 Packet Page 15 of 202 provide $1.2 million to assist in the purchase of that property. He clarified he signed an agreement to release the City from any obligation on a playfield that was never the City's and had been sold by the Edmonds School District to another party. However, as City Attorney Snyder indicated in his memo, Mayor Haakenson stated he should have presented the matter to Council for approval and apologized for not doing so. Tonight's request for approval was to satisfy the auditor should it ever be questioned. He noted the Interlocal Agreement had been through the Edmonds School District audit. Councilmember Plunkett referred to an email that stated the State Auditor's Office was investigating the gift of public funds. Mayor Haakenson answered he was unaware of any auditor investigation. Councilmember Plunkett inquired about an appeal filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) with regard to the Interlocal Agreement. Mr. Snyder responded there had been allegations; however, he had no knowledge of such an appeal. He advised the GMHB held hearings on Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, not Interlocal Agreements and all appeals of those elements must be filed within 60 days of adoption of the element. The City's Comprehensive Plan documents were adopted and published on December 24, 2006; any appeals to the GMHB would have to have been filed by February 24, 2007. Councilmember Plunkett clarified he was told Snohomish County was being sued under the GMA in regard to this Interlocal Agreement. Mr. Snyder stated it was possible; however, the date was significant. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO RATIFY THE TERMINATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AND RATIFY THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE. Regardless of whether the Interlocal Agreement was terminated by Mayor Haakenson or by the Council, Councilmember Dawson questioned why the Council would want to terminate the Interlocal Agreement. Her issue was not with whether Mayor Haakenson had the authority to terminate the Interlocal Agreement. She agreed with Mr. Snyder there was no legal bearing of the prior document as it did not create any rights or legal obligations and if it did create any rights or legal obligations, then the buyer purchased the property subject to the Interlocal Agreement without any statement from the City that the Interlocal Agreement would be terminated. She understood the School District's motivation to terminate the Interlocal Agreement but was uncertain the benefit to the City. She did not support ratifying the termination of the previously executed Interlocal Agreement but would support ratifying the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Snohomish County for funding assistance. Councilmember Plunkett suggested there were two separate issues, ratifying the termination of the previously executed Interlocal Agreement on which he noted there remained several issues to be resolved, and ratifying the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Snohomish County for funding assistance. He requested the issues be addressed separately. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO RATIFY THE TERMINATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. Councilmember Wambolt recalled the Council voted 4-3 to purchase 5.5 acres. This was one of the steps associated with that purchase. He noted the school needed to be demolished and that could only occur if Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 13 Packet Page 16 of 202 the Interlocal Agreement was terminated. With regard to the assertions that termination of the Interlocal Agreement 2.5 years before its expiration was a gift of public funds, he pointed out the City was purchasing the 5.5 acres for $4.2 million. In 2.5 years, the land would be substantially more expensive. Councilmember Dawson disagreed with Councilmember Wambolt, noting the City could continue with their purchase of the 5.5 acres and not terminate the Interlocal Agreement. Councilmember Moore cited numerous procedural errors including that a Comprehensive Plan change was required, the Council was never informed that an Interlocal Agreement existed and that the Mayor erroneously signed the termination of the Interlocal Agreement. She questioned how this could be prevented in the future, noting the circumstances were unusual including the City Clerk being on vacation, etc. She would not support the motion. Council President Olson pointed out once the Edmonds School District sold the property, the City's responsibility under the Interlocal Agreement was maintaining the ballfields. Once the property was sold, the Interlocal Agreement became moot. Councilmember Wambolt asked why this was before the Council if it was not needed. Mr. Snyder explained an Interlocal Agreement was an agreement between governmental bodies for the exercise of governmental powers. In this case the City maintained the ballfields in exchange for scheduling the ballfields and using the property in the same manner as district patrons. The Interlocal Agreement did not run with the land and the Interlocal Agreement was referenced in both transactions. Mr. Snyder explained the reason this was before the Council was Ms. Petso was an articulate and persistent spokesperson and has indicated her next request will be for the Council to enforce the public's right to use the Burnside property for a ballfield. He summarized the issue would not go away by not dealing with it. Because it was an agreement between governmental bodies, an Interlocal Agreement was not a right for an individual person to use land. He was uncertain how the City could enforce the public's right to use the ballfield and how he could argue that the City did not receive notice from the School District that they were terminating the agreement via sale of the property last summer. He offered to discuss legal issues in Executive Session. He agreed with Councilmember Dawson it was a non -issue but viewed it as clearing a paper impediment that relies on the City to maintain a ballfield it does not own or have a right to. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT AND MARIN IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON, PLUNKETT, MOORE AND ORVIS OPPOSED. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO RATIFY THE INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE ACQUISITION OF ALL OR PART OF THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SITE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Dawson recognized Snohomish County Councilmember Gary Nelson for his assistance in obtaining the funds from Snohomish County. 8A. HISTORICAL REPORT ON TERM LIMITS City Attorney Scott Snyder emphasized the issue was not the wisdom of term limits but the proper procedure for enacting term limits. He explained in the early 1990s Mayor Naughton ran for a third term; the City had an ordinance enacted in 1983 limiting the mayor to two terms. Mayor Naughton got an order Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 14 Packet Page 17 of 202 to put his name on the ballot from the Washington State Supreme Court Commissioner; the City engaged outside Council and brought an action to declare the City's ordinance valid and prohibiting Snohomish County from placing Mayor Naughton's name on the ballot. In an effort to resolve the issue, then State Senator Gary Nelson requested an Attorney General opinion. The Attorney General issued an opinion in July 1991 that a code city, a city organized under RCW 35A or a home rule charter, had the broadest powers available under State law. The Attorney General analyzed it from the perspective of the person running for office; was it an infringement on their rights. The State had two limitations, 1) a resident of the city, 2) a certain age; the Attorney General saw the City Council as having the legislative power to add to that. A month later in a lawsuit brought by the City, Judge Allendorfer of Snohomish County Superior Court voided the City's ordinance. Judge Allendorfer pointed out term limits did not deal with the rights of a person running for office but limited the choices available to a member of the voting public. His analysis was that term limits as a limitation on the voters right to choose were part of the fundamental power related to the organic laws of the City and under Washington State Constitution, Article 11 Section 10, changes to the organic structure must be made in the charter via a home rule charter (for a home rule charter county or city), or for a City like Edmonds via the Legislature amending RCW 35A. Mayor Naughton subsequently lost at the polls and the appeal was dropped. This placed the City in an uncomfortable position as the ordinance had been voided. In the early 90's when Republicans assumed the majority for the first time in many years, term limits were adopted at the federal level, and in the State of Washington 1-573 passed which imposed congressional term limits as well as term limits on state elected officials. In March 1994 Judge Dwyer of the US District Court struck down a portion of the initiative that related to federal positions. In analyzing the issue, the Washington Supreme Court followed the same analysis used by Judge Allendorfer, particularly the Supreme Court's reliance on the Bartz and Bellingham case were identical to the analysis applied by Judge Allendorfer. Mr. Snyder summarized Judge Dwyer struck down I-573 stating it was a fundamental part of the underlying organizational structure or organic laws of the state; any change to impose term limits at the state level must be by Constitution and at the federal level there must be a change to the US Constitution. In 1995 the US Supreme Court struck down a Constitutional amendment in Arkansas that purported to limit the ability of Arkansas voters to vote for a third term for a Congressman, finding it required a change to the organic law of the US to impose a limitation on US Representatives. Meanwhile, the City Council repealed the City's term limit ordinance. In January 1998 the Washington Supreme Court ruled again on the same rationale that the 1-573 provisions could not be enacted by the voters by initiative; it required a Constitutional amendment. He explained the difference between an initiative and Constitutional amendment; an initiative was an exercise of legislative powers by the people versus an amendment to the State Constitution. In the Washington State Supreme Court decision cited Bartz, Sorenson and Bellingham cases and its rationale was the same as was used by Judge Allendorfer. He recalled both the Washington Supreme Court and Judge Dwyer quoted Alexander Hamilton and the federalist papers in stating the people should choose who they pleased to govern, reaffirming the principle that limiting the voters' choices needed to be done via Constitutional amendment. With regard to Councilmember Moore's questions concerning information provided by Municipal Research Service Center (MRSC), he noted they provided the Attorney General's 1991 opinion but there were three very important cases as well as a fourth case applicable only to Edmonds indicating term limits Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 15 Packet Page 18 of 202 needed to be imposed by adoption of a home rule charter or amendment of RCW 35A by the State Legislature. With regard to the question Councilmember Moore relayed about other cities imposing term limits, Mr. Snyder explained most were home rule charter cities or counties. He opined that Richland adopted term limits after the Attorney General's opinion but without further follow-up. He advised he had forwarded a copy of these materials to MRSC and soon their website would have an asterisk by the Attorney General's opinion recommending cities consult their City Attorney. Councilmember Moore explained she assumed when she raised this issue that any change in the provision of an elected office would not apply to anyone currently serving in that position and would apply only to future electeds. Mr. Snyder answered it would depend on the effective date. He explained the legal options available would be virtually impossible to have in place by this year's election. He agreed the salary of an elected official could not be changed during their term. Councilmember Moore commented she was not a fan of term limits any higher than the local level as State Legislature or Congress required a great deal of training . She commented it was important to encourage turnover at the local level to allow for grooming of new leadership as well as a flow of new ideas. She asked what other methods were available if term limits were not possible. Mr. Snyder advised there were a number of options as long as they did not limit the voters' choice. Councilmember Wambolt recalled the Council could pass a non -binding resolution. Mr. Snyder agreed that would be an option for the Council to offer their perspective. Councilmember Wambolt referred to comments made by Judge Allendorfer who struck down the City's term limits: term limits are arguably justifiable under a wide variety of theories. "Term limitations preserve fresh and responsive government. Term limitations guard against political entrenchment. Term limitations inject new and innovative leadership into the political system. They encourage incumbents to devote their full energies to public office rather than campaign during their final term of office. They expand the spectrum of political candidates and they tend to avoid political monopolies." Councilmember Wambolt summarized there was some merit in Judge Allendorfer's comments. Councilmember Dawson found it ironic that Judge Allendorfer had been a judge for four terms. She thanked Mr. Snyder for the background he provided. She noted although many assumed term limits could not be established via City ordinance, it would be good to have the history when/if this issue arises in the future. Council President Olson commented the county had a limitation of three terms for the County Executive and Council because that was the way the county was set it up in the 1880s. Councilmember Moore explained she found offices at the local level different. Councilmembers were essentially volunteers versus the Mayor who received a family wage and had a full time staff. She explained when she ran for City Council, it was to take her turn. She found it important for other citizens to take their turn. She found the Mayor's job different as it was both management and visionary. In a City Manager form of government, the City was managed by a professional City Manager, allowing the City Council and the Mayor to do visionary work they were intended to do. She suggested citizens explore the option of a City Manager form of government, noting it would eliminate the "crap shoot" of who was elected Mayor. She noted although the Mayor's salary was a family wage, it was not the type of salary that could compete with industry for CEOs. Thus few residents with a good income who were qualified for the Mayor's position would run for Mayor. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 16 Packet Page 19 of 202 Councilmember Moore opined the City would be better served by a City Manager form of government to provide a serious, professional manager who managed staff, etc. and answered to the City Council. She explained it was appropriate for Edmonds to consider a City Manager form of government because the City was no longer a small town and technically was a medium-sized city. She urged citizens interested in exploring a City Manager form of government to provide feedback to the Council. Councilmember Orvis expressed support for term limits at all levels for all positions. Councilmember Dawson asked Councilmember Orvis how many terms. Councilmember Orvis responded three for Councilmembers. Councilmember Dawson pointed out most cities in the State of Washington who had a City Manager form of government were small cities, larger cities like Seattle and Everett had strong, full-time Mayors. She recalled a great deal of turnover on the Council in another city interested in replacing the City Manager. She noted Washington State and Snohomish County favored elected offices as evidenced by the charter review this year. Edmonds is a large enough city that it had a talent pool to elect a strong Mayor. She relayed Snohomish County Councilmember Gary Nelson's strong opposition to term limits for the Mayor and opposition to a City Manager form of government for Edmonds. Council President Olson commented a City Manager form of government would not stop a Council from micro -managing issues, noting Councils operated virtually the same whether they had a City Manager or a strong Mayor. Councilmember Marin did not support term limits and was satisfied a strong Mayor was the right approach for Edmonds. 8B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented on the Interlocal Agreement for the former Woodway Elementary School site. Next he advised a complaint was filed that was being reviewed by the State. He advised the Hearing Examiner decision regarding demolition of the school building was appealed to Snohomish County Superior Court. With regard to term limits, he relayed a conversation with former Mayor Laura Hall who suggested he speak to the Council which he did on January 23. He also referred to a meeting he had with Mayor Haakenson regarding term limits. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Dave Page, Edmonds, referred to his indication at a previous Council meeting that Lynnwood was not participating in the Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, and Shoreline to fund studies of Lake Ballinger. After attending a Lynnwood City Council meeting, the Council and Mayor agreed to participate. He commented in the process of visiting other City Councils, he learned Mountlake Terrace applied for $10 million in grant funds, $6 million has been awarded. He further noted all other Council meetings have the audience comment item following the housekeeping items at the beginning of the meeting, some have a five minute limit and others have a three minute limit. He encouraged Council to consider having audience comment at the beginning of the meeting to encourage public comment. D. J. Wilson, Edmonds, stated term limits and the City Manager versus strong Mayor form of government were fundamental questions and were at least as important as the recent discussions regarding building heights and urged the Council not to discuss it whimsically. He recalled spending a week or more on City Manager versus strong Mayor form of government when teaching American government at Edmonds Community College and other schools. He provided criteria for considering City Manager Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 17 Packet Page 20 of 202 versus strong Mayor form of government, first, cities that choose a Mayor versus City Manager form of government need to measure the engagement of their citizens; an engaged citizenry that creates an engaged Council has as its balance a strong Mayor. A disengaged citizenry often does not have the skills or experience on the Council, leading to a disengaged Council, and requiring the professional skills of a City Manager. The second consideration was in a City Manager form of government, the City Manager was a political liaison between the Council and the staff. In larger cities, the City Manager becomes more politicized than they may otherwise wish to be, consequently City staffs become more politicized. He concluded an elected Mayor protected staff, kept them professional and removed any cloud of politics. Ray Martin, Edmonds, recalled former Mayor Naughton seconded the motion to establish term limits. He relayed Mayor Haakenson's comment that he would listen to the voters and abide by the Council decision. He suggested testing the Mayor's sincerity by adopting a resolution that limited the Mayor to two consecutive terms. He noted term limits would encourage competition and allow the Mayor to talk to citizens about issues and less time on lawsuits. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, suggested the Council's retreat include a discussion regarding appointment of board and commission members. He supported term limits for board and commission members as the turnover resulted in fresh ideas. Next he expressed support for Laura Petso's efforts and disagreed with Mr. Snyder's speculation about her motives. He then pointed out the Comprehensive Plan designated the former Woodway Elementary school site as a park and the City had never held a public hearing to change the designation. Don Kreiman, Edmonds, commented public participation was not just making comment at Council meetings; it included serving on boards and commissions. He recognized the members of the Planning Board and Architectural Design Board for their efforts, noting there were many other citizens qualified to serve. He urged caution in establishing term limits for boards and commissions, citing several existing openings. Duane Bowman referred to Mr. Hertrich's comments at the March 6 Council meeting that Engineering staff mismanaged the 220th Street project. Mr. Hertrich's comments were followed by comments by Councilmember Moore that gave the impression she did not know what was going on with the project and that she had concerns in November 2006 with the budget for the project when the Council approved the increase in the project budget. He noted Councilmember Moore's concerns were not shared with staff and the minutes do not reflect her concern. Staff had consistently kept the Council informed with regard to the 220th project and its budget. In addition to periodic update flyers and newsletter articles, staff brought issues relating to the Council for action on nine occasions. He explained beginning on March 1, 2005, Council authorized staff to advertise for construction bids. On June 7, 2005 the Council awarded the contract for construction of the 220th Street project and approved a budget of approximately $5.07 million. Currently the estimated final cost is approximately $5,405,000. Included in the cost increase are: the additional scope of work requested and paid 100% by Olympic View Water and Sewer District ($30,198), and Edmonds School District ($67,724), for a total of $97,922. Also included is correcting the design error for the left turn pocket at 9th Avenue which was 100% funded by Perteet Engineering ($29,913). Also included is the approximately $140,000 in unanticipated consultant services for the construction engineering due to the resignation of the Traffic Engineer. Subtracting these from $5,405,000 equated to $5,137,165 which represents a 1% increase over the June 5, 2005 authorized budget. Even including the $330,000 increase in traffic control, neither the City Engineer nor he viewed this as a huge cost overrun for a project of this size and complexity. He concluded the City's Engineering staff were professionals who accomplished a great deal and managed the 220th project appropriately. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 18 Packet Page 21 of 202 In response to Mr. Hertrich's comment that he was speculating about Ms. Petso's motives, Mr. Snyder quoted from a March 20, 2007 letter from Ms. Petso to the City Council that states in paragraph 2 with the 1999 Interlocal Agreement in place, the public can access the fields on the western part of the property while demolition and park development occur on the eastern part. Paragraph 3 and 7 of her letter state the City can expect she will consider a similar action against the City if the Council votes to ratify Mayor Haakenson's unauthorized signature. G�:S 04 01.14 KfUre 1y(K�lil►`[y-i-1[K��I Y 04 3201 Di BW I IO[e'f." Finance Committee Councilmember Orvis reported the Committee discussed surplus of community monitors and donation to Interconnect and recommended approval as a consent agenda item (approved on tonight's consent agenda). The committee discussed legal services and requested Finance perform an analysis of the cost benefit of using inside versus outside legal services. The Committee then discussed the 2201h Street project and requested staff provide additional information. Public Safety Committee Councilmember Plunkett reported the Committee again discussed graffiti and directed staff to present a broad range of options to the full Council for a public hearing. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson had no report. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Marin reported at the Community Transit retreat two years ago the Board's goals were, 1) improve ridership, and 2) be good stewards of public funds. Last week at the American Public Transportation Association Conference in Washington DC he accepted an award for Community Transit from the Secretary of the Federal Transit Administration, for improvement in ridership, one of twelve awards this year. He accepted a second award for improvement in ridership for Sound Transit. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:34 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 20, 2007 Page 19 Packet Page 22 of 202 AM-906 Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting 2.C. Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Debbie Karber, Administrative Services Submitted For: Dan Clements Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subiect Title Approval of claim checks #95004 through #95183 for March 22, 2007 in the amount of $833,409.80. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44617 through #44669 for the period of March 1 through March 15, 2007 in the amount of $909,024.34. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2007 Revenue: Expenditure: $1,742,434.14 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $833,409.80 Payroll: $909,024.34 Link: Claim cks 3-22-07 Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 03/22/2007 01:44 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:15 PM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 02:24 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 03/22/2007 01:24 PM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 23 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95004 3/22/2007 071570 A & A PRINTING INC 39821 WATER - 1000 WARNING TAGS (W WATER - 1000 WARNING TAGS (W 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 126.24 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.11 Total : 137.35 95005 3/22/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 238854 1-13992 PEST CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 57.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 5.12 Total : 62.62 95006 3/22/2007 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND APRIL 07 KENNELING SERVICES/APRIL 2001 APRIL KENNELING SERVICES 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 1,895.07 Total : 1,895.07 95007 3/22/2007 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 07-91 FLOORING MAINTENANCE FLOORING MAINTENANCE 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 273.33 Total : 273.33 95008 3/22/2007 064419 AMERICAN SERVICES ASSOC 06090307 200735.01-300 02 LEAK TESTING 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 3,231.00 Total : 3,231.00 95009 3/22/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3837549 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 35.46 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.16 Total : 38.62 Page: 1 Packet Page 24 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher front Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95010 3/22/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3837551 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.33 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.59 Total : 92.92 95011 3/22/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3831253 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3835920 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 Page: 2 Packet Page 25 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95011 3/22/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3835921 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70 Page: 3 Packet Page 26 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95011 3/22/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) 512-3835922 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3837550 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 Total : 108.53 95012 3/22/2007 071565 AROLD, KRISTEN AROLD7939 HAND-CRAFTED BOOKS HAND-CRAFTED BOOKS #7939 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 60.00 Total : 60.00 95013 3/22/2007 001670 ASSOCIATED GLASS 1062755 FAC - SHOWCASE TOP GLIDES FAC - SHOWCASE TOP GLIDES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.27 Total : 3.27 95014 3/22/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 368759 SVC FEE SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 7.61 Page: 4 Packet Page 27 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95014 3/22/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 555620 FLEET DIESEL - 160 GAL FLEET DIESEL - 160 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 326.48 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 57.15 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 555816 FLEET SUPREME - 5706 GAL FLEET SUPREME - 5706 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 12,346.06 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 2,043.90 FLEET UNLEADED - 1701 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 3,528.21 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, W 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 609.30 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 20.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 20.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 1.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 1.60 Page: 5 Packet Page 28 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95014 3/22/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 555885 FLEET DIELSEL -166 GAL FLEET DIELSEL -166 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 346.82 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 59.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80 Page: 6 Packet Page 29 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95014 3/22/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 555956 FLEET DIESEL - 3360 GAL FLEET DIESEL - 3360 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 6,791.57 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1,200.19 FLEET BIODIESEL - 840 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 1,957.20 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 301.73 FLEET REGULAR - 4801 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 10,313.51 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, W 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 1,719.72 FLEET PREMIUM - 1103 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 2,470.29 WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY TAX, Wi 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 396.19 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 10.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 10.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 10.00 WA ST SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 10.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 0.80 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.11 0.80 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 0.80 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 0.80 Total : 44,691.40 Page: 7 Packet Page 30 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95015 3/22/2007 064343 AT&T 425-775-2525 SWITCHBOARD 2/7-3/7/07 Switchboard 2/7-3/7/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 69.70 Total : 69.70 95016 3/22/2007 064343 AT&T 425-774-0944 STATION #20 FAX STATION #20 FAX 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 28.41 Total : 28.41 95017 3/22/2007 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST April 2007 APRIL 2007 AWC PREMIUMS 04/07 Fire Pension AWC Premiums 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 4,396.65 04/07 Retirees AWC Premiums 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 25,382.10 04/07 Gaydos AWC Premiums 001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,004.18 04/07 AWC Premiums 811.000.000.231.510.000.00 265,175.97 Total : 295,958.90 95018 3/22/2007 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 338695 FLEET INVENTORY - ROTOR, KIT FLEET INVENTORY - ROTOR, KIT 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 321.04 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 28.25 339861 FLEET INVENTORY - HUB ASSEME FLEET INVENTORY - HUB ASSEME 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 492.10 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 43.30 339922 FLEET INVENTORY - ROTOR FLEET INVENTORY - ROTOR 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 151.32 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 13.32 Page: 8 Packet Page 31 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95018 3/22/2007 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC (Continued) 339928 FLEET INVENTORY PARTS - KIT FLEET INVENTORY PARTS - KIT 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 88.72 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 7.81 Total : 1,145.86 95019 3/22/2007 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 070315COE 03/07 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE 03/07 Web Site Maintenance 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 95020 3/22/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 559242 INV#559242 EDMONDS PD - AC VE VESTS FOR DAVIS, DAWSON, LYC 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1,949.85 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 171.59 Total : 2,121.44 95021 3/22/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1450488 C-251 ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMEW C-251 ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMEW 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 4,900.36 Total : 4,900.36 95022 3/22/2007 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN7682 BIRD CLASS BACKYARD BIRDS #7682 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 69.30 Total : 69.30 95023 3/22/2007 067947 BROWNELLS INC 04292237.00 INV#04292237.00 ACCT#00557761 I GUN REPAIR/CLEANING SUPPLIES 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 215.46 Freight 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 9.25 Total : 224.71 Page: 9 Packet Page 32 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95024 3/22/2007 071434 BRUNETTE, SISSEL BRUNETTE7990 PRE -NATAL FITNESS PRE -NATAL FITNESS #7990 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 140.00 Total : 140.00 95025 3/22/2007 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 275156 STREET - CRUSHED ROCK STREET -CRUSHED ROCK 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 2,485.44 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 188.89 Total : 2,674.33 95026 3/22/2007 064861 CAIN BOLT AND GASKET INC 66737 CIEWDA C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 73.20 Freight 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 9.91 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 6.44 Total : 89.55 95027 3/22/2007 071531 CARRITHERS, MICHAEL 020907 JURY FEES JURY FEES 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total : 14.85 95028 3/22/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY104689 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 41.32 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.68 Total : 45.00 95029 3/22/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 87196442X03082007 871964442 PLANT CELL PHONES 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 29.48 Page: 10 Packet Page 33 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95029 3/22/2007 064341 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS (Continued) Total : 29.48 95030 3/22/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-660-2168 C/A 129795740 Cell phone Gene 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 40.25 Total : 40.25 95031 3/22/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 871747052XO3152007 Bowman cell phone 2/8/07 to 3/7/07 Bowman cell phone 2/8/07 to 3/7/07 001.000.620.558.800.420.00 6.40 Total : 6.40 95032 3/22/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460582588 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460582589 OPS UNIFORMS Stn 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51 460583643 UNIFORMS Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 101.09 Stn 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 101.09 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.99 460583666 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 Page: 11 Packet Page 34 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95032 3/22/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION (Continued) 460587791 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460587792 UNIFORMS Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51 Total : 688.79 95033 3/22/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1761743 FAC MAINT - KITCHEN TOWELS (R FAC MAINT - KITCHEN TOWELS (R 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 199.12 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.74 Total : 219.36 95034 3/22/2007 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0326 BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER @ E 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 108.00 Total : 108.00 95035 3/22/2007 071574 COLLEGIATE PACIFIC 0456631-IN FITNESS SUPPLIES ELECTRIC INFLATOR 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 63.99 Freight 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 10.24 Page: 12 Packet Page 35 of 202 vchlist 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 13 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95035 3/22/2007 071574 COLLEGIATE PACIFIC (Continued) 0457431-IN FITNESS SUPPLIES LEATHER JUMP ROPES 001.000.640.575.540.310.00 119.88 Freight 001.000.640.575.540.310.00 19.18 450936 MERCHANDISE CREDIT RETURNED JUMP ROPES 001.000.640.575.540.310.00 -32.58 451296 MERCHANDISE CREDIT RETURNED JUMP ROPES 001.000.640.575.540.310.00 -19.80 Total : 160.91 95036 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 021307 TRAVEL EXPENSE TO MID YEAR N TRAVEL EXPENSE TO MID YEAR N 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 1,290.28 Total : 1,290.28 95037 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630636395271 Banquet Rm AWC Dinner for Cities 8 Banquet Rm AWC Dinner for Cities 8 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 2,254.96 Hotel AWC Conference 4/24 7 4/25/1 001.000.210.513.100.430.00 114.40 AWC Seminar 4/24- 4/25/07, C. Cruz 001.000.610.519.700.490.00 150.00 AWC Seminar, 4/24 - 4/25/07, S. Clif 001.000.610.519.700.490.00 150.00 AWC Seminar 4/24 & 4/25/07 - L. Ca 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 150.00 Page: 13 Packet Page 36 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95037 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS (Continued) 4715630649063718 Lead Water Maint. Worker, #07-04 Lead Water Maint. Worker, #07-04 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00 ASCE - Transportation Engineer Ad, 001.000.620.532.200.440.00 225.00 Transportation Engineer, #07-07 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00 Parks Maint. Worker I, #07-09 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00 AWC Labor Relations Conf - RegistrE 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 165.00 Total : 3,284.36 95038 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715 6300 0170 8272 ACCT#4715 6300 0170 8272 - EDM( LAWLESS/LODGING- 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 196.52 HOCKEY PUCK/ARMORY 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 8.68 THREADLOCKER/ARMORY 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 6.50 RAGS/ARMORY 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 11.94 4715 6300 0170 8298 ACCT#4715 6300 0170 8298 - BARE MAN DEVIL LE/SM ITH/REG ISTRATI C 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 258.00 3/AIR PUMPS FOR DEPT.- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 87.10 BARD/AIRFARE- 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 388.80 MAN DEVILLE/REGISTRATION- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 129.99 DAMIAN SMITH/REGISTRATION- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 129.99 Page: 14 Packet Page 37 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95038 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Invoice (Continued) 4715 6300 0208 9821 Llrlw-1CiiPW.Y*TCIC3►Z-w 4715 6306 3771 2276 95039 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630654555988 PO # Description/Account ACCT#4715 6300 0208 9821 - EDM( CD-R SPINDLE- 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 ACCT#4715 6302 2283 3263 - OBRII BARREL FOR SMITH & WESSON- 001.000.410.521.400.350.00 FALK/MC HELMET 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 ACCT #4715 6306 3771 2276 - GAN GANNON/REG ISTRATION- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 Total ; SKILLPATH SEMINARS - M JOHNS( Amount 43.50 81.93 543.99 165.00 2,051.94 Page: 15 Packet Page 38 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95039 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Invoice (Continued) 4715630897461457 95040 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630851494783 PO # Description/Account Amount SKILLPATH SEMINARS - M JOHNS( 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 199.00 SKILLPATH SEMINARS - T HANSOP 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 199.00 WALMART - SHREDDER FOR PW 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 10.28 WALMART - SHREDDER FOR PW 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 10.28 WALMART - SHREDDER FOR PW 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 10.28 WALMART - SHREDDER FOR PW 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.28 WALMART - SHREDDER FOR PW 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 10.28 WALMART - SHREDDER FOR PW 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.25 FRED PRYOR SEMINAR - KIM STEM 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 179.00 BUSINESS 21 PUBLISHING - 4 COF 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 296.99 LAMPS PLUS - REPLACEMENT FOI 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 76.20 PAYPAL/APWA - SEMINAR FOR N I PAYPAL/APWA - SEMINAR FOR N 1 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 35.00 Total : 1,046.84 Lodging AWC Meeting Olson/Wambc Lodging AWC Meeting Olson/Wambc 001.000.110.511.100.430.00 220.80 Reg Marin PSRC Mtg 4-5-2007 001.000.110.511.100.490.00 40.00 Reg fee Moore AWC Mtg 4/24-25/07 001.000.110.511.100.490.00 150.00 Page: 16 Packet Page 39 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95040 3/22/2007 069983 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS (Continued) Total : 410.80 95041 3/22/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 630001918475 TRAINING TRAVEL Dahl, Oftedahl,Anderson,Ness 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 2,168.32 630002081232 WHITE Wenatchee conf 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 439.89 630182276669 ALLISON prof serv-laminating 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 31.04 630280384662 LUCAS Electronics recycle fee 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 65.00 Ink cartridges 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 229.13 630340709759 STARTZMAN Admin misc-registratn fee 001.000.510.522.100.490.00 799.00 630415178708 TRAINING TRAVEL Wenatchee conf 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 593.35 630964429858 CO RRE I RA Reg fee Natl training 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 223.20 Training travel-Natl 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 40.71 NFPA resources 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 193.31 Total : 4,782.95 95042 3/22/2007 004595 CONKLIN APPLIANCE P077496 FS 16 - TIMER FOR WASHING MAC FS 16 - TIMER FOR WASHING MAC 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.95 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.45 Page: 17 Packet Page 40 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95042 3/22/2007 004595 004595 CONKLIN APPLIANCE (Continued) Total : 54.40 95043 3/22/2007 065364 CONTRACT HARDWARE INC 0031724-IN FAC - LOCKSET FAC-LOCKSET 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 131.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.57 Total : 143.07 95044 3/22/2007 069157 COOK, CYNDI COOK7925 HULA CLASSES HULA KIDS #7925 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 210.00 HULA ADULT #7919 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 210.00 HULA ADULT #7921 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 840.00 Total : 1,260.00 95045 3/22/2007 070136 CORREIRA, MARK 510-2341 TRAINING TRAVEL Natnl conf 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 97.24 Total : 97.24 95046 3/22/2007 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3189602 E7FC.RFQ Lake Ballinger Level Stud E7FC.RFQ Lake Ballinger Level Stud 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 129.50 Total : 129.50 95047 3/22/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 37851-00 VHF MOBILE UNITS VHF MOBILE UNITS 511.000.657.548.680.640.00 2,728.50 RADIO PROGRAMMING AND MICS 511.000.657.548.680.640.00 129.50 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.640.00 27.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.640.00 256.77 Page: 18 Packet Page 41 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95047 3/22/2007 061570 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 (Continued) Total : 3,141.77 95048 3/22/2007 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 0080247 PS ELEV OPERATING PERMIT - PS ELEV OPERATING PERMIT- 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 105.90 0080500 SR CENTER ELEV OPERATING PEI SR CENTER ELEV OPERATING PEI 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 105.90 Total : 211.80 95049 3/22/2007 068903 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 4900/0100011865/2007 MARINA BEACH MARINA BEACH- 001.000.640.574.100.450.00 5,306.21 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.450.00 681.32 Total : 5,987.53 95050 3/22/2007 064640 DMCMA 041707 COURT TRAINING REGISTRATION COURT TRAINING REGISTRATION 001.000.230.512.501.490.00 50.00 COURT TRAINING REGISTRATION 001.000.230.512.500.490.00 100.00 Total : 150.00 95051 3/22/2007 071393 DRUCK INC 54859 CIT312 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 760.20 Total : 760.20 95052 3/22/2007 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02281391 CITY PARKS BLDG - STUDS, BEAD CITY PARKS BLDG - STUDS, BEAD 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 565.74 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.79 Total : 615.53 95053 3/22/2007 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 201632 INTERPRETER FEES Page: 19 Packet Page 42 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95053 3/22/2007 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER (Continued) INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 68.58 201633 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 80.78 201634 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 54.86 201635 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 86.45 201792 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 58.10 201793 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.98 Total : 437.75 95054 3/22/2007 068357 EARTH TECH 92358-10-407425 ESFG.Consulting thru 03/02/07 ESFG.Consulting thru 03/02/07 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 3,933.05 Total : 3,933.05 95055 3/22/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 9856 UPS FLUKE/ANALYSIS PLUS UPS FLUKE/ANALYSIS PLUS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 100.72 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 8.96 Total : 109.68 95056 3/22/2007 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP YOUTHSCHOL0314 REFUND TO YOUTH SCHOLARSHII REFUND TO YOUTH SCHOLARSHII 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 80.00 Total : 80.00 Page: 20 Packet Page 43 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95057 3/22/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00025 CITY MARINA BEACH PARK CITY MARINA BEACH PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 38.85 6-00200 CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROON CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROON 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 99.52 6-00410 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 80.91 6-00475 MINI PARK MINI PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 199.50 6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD CITY PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 62.76 6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT CITY PARK PARKING LOT 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 297.24 6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD PINE STREET PLAYFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 67.47 6-02900 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (: ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (: 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 59.22 6-03000 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPR CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPR 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 114.22 6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 38.85 6-03575 CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 71.42 6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 59.22 Page: 21 Packet Page 44 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95057 3/22/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 6-04425 WATER BILL 8100 185TH PL SW 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 129.30 6-04450 SIERRA PARK SIERRA PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 86.69 6-07775 BALLINGER PARK BALLINGER PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 76.13 6-08500 YOST PARK SPRINKLER YOST PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 293.21 6-08525 YOST PARK POOL YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 62.27 Total : 1,836.78 95058 3/22/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-01127 WWTP WATER WWTP WATER 411.000.656.538.800.473.64 38.85 6-01130 WWTP WATER WWTP WATER 411.000.656.538.800.473.64 11.45 6-01140 WWTP WATER WWTP WATER 411.000.656.538.800.473.64 483.84 Total : 534.14 95059 3/22/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 023290 COPIER MAINT COPIER MAINT 001.000.230.512.500.450.00 32.65 Total : 32.65 95060 3/22/2007 071566 ELVERSTON, MARK ELVERSTON0315 REFUND Page: 22 Packet Page 45 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95060 3/22/2007 071566 ELVERSTON, MARK (Continued) REFUND DUE TO INSUFFICIENT RI 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 575.00 Total : 575.00 95061 3/22/2007 064013 EMERGENCY SERVICES 007-020 TRAINING SUPPLIES Reimb for Honey Bucket 001.000.510.522.400.450.00 52.89 Total : 52.89 95062 3/22/2007 067945 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 537-48-6947 EMPLOY SECURITY DEPT ORDER Michael E Greene- Employment Secl 811.000.000.211.100.000.00 1,441.36 Total : 1,441.36 95063 3/22/2007 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0027338-IN INV#0027338-IN ACCT#0011847 ED OFFICER OF THE YEAR BADGE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 76.00 RESERVE OFFICER OF YEAR BAD 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 76.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.73 Total : 163.73 95064 3/22/2007 066359 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSO 475230 C410701 PH/DEMAND/HARDNESS/RESIDUA 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 314.10 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 34.03 Total : 348.13 95065 3/22/2007 069586 ESPIRITU, KRISTA ESPIRITU7924 HULA KIDS HULA KIDS #7924 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 378.00 Total : 378.00 95066 3/22/2007 071572 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS 33897A INV#33897A CUST#21159 EDMONE Page: 23 Packet Page 46 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95066 3/22/2007 071572 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS (Continued) DISPOSABLE PLASTIC TWEEZERS 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 16.00 SWAB BOXES 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 15.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 11.00 Total : 42.00 95067 3/22/2007 063387 FEREBEE, JOAN 022807 TRAVEL EXPENSE FOR MID YEAR TRAVEL EXPENSE FOR MID YEAR 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 63.76 Total : 63.76 95068 3/22/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0085995 WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRBXPL WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRBXPL 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 2,811.00 W-MTRLIDDI-01-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 2,175.42 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 438.81 Total : 5,425.23 95069 3/22/2007 067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING KING7507 ETIQUETTE CLASSES LOOKING GOOD FOR GIRLS- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 240.00 Total : 240.00 95070 3/22/2007 009835 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INTL 9508 LEASE FOR CROWN VIC LEASE FOR 2004 CROWN VIC TRA 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 711.75 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 65.49 Page: 24 Packet Page 47 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95070 3/22/2007 009835 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INTL (Continued) 9509 MONTHLY LEASE; 6 CROWN VICS UNIT 235,236,237,238,239 Monthly L 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 3,358.33 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 308.96 Total : 4,444.53 95071 3/22/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 92198 February 2007 Section 125 & 132 ple February 2007 Section 125 & 132 ple 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 85.80 Total : 85.80 95072 3/22/2007 010660 FOSTER, MARLO 35 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 826.80 Total : 826.80 95073 3/22/2007 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA GLEISNER7621 TAIJIQUAN CLASSES TAIJIQUAN #7621 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 607.50 TAIJIQUAN #7609 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 337.50 Total : 945.00 95074 3/22/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9315297029 837944131 FUSE 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 54.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 4.80 9318755049 837944131 SAFETY/ ENTRY KIT 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 111.05 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 9.78 Total : 180.13 Page: 25 Packet Page 48 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95075 3/22/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9311598503 PS - MOUNTED BALL BEARINGS PS - MOUNTED BALL BEARINGS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 84.06 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.23 9313056674 PS - SOLDERING IRON KIT, FLUX ( PS - SOLDERING IRON KIT, FLUX ( 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 64.43 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.54 9314052151 FAC MAINT - DESOLDERING PUMF FAC MAINT - DESOLDERING PUMF 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 29.32 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.52 9314052169 PS - CONTRACTOR 20A 2 POLE DF PS - CONTRACTOR 20A 2 POLE DF 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 27.36 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.35 Total : 222.81 95076 3/22/2007 071535 GRIFFITH, GERALD 020907 JURY FEE JURY FEE 001.000.230.512.540.490.00 14.85 Total : 14.85 95077 3/22/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5058731 112830-000 BOD/REAGENT SET/VIALS/REAGB 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 524.80 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 33.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 49.08 Total : 606.88 Page: 26 Packet Page 49 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95078 3/22/2007 068302 HALFON CANDY COMPANY 131893 EGG HUNT CANDY CANDY FOR EASTER EGG HUNT 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 211.00 Total : 211.00 95079 3/22/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 70105 UNIT 720 - WHEEL ASSEMBLY UNIT 720 - WHEEL ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 284.52 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 25.32 70447 UNIT 119 - SYNCHRONIZER UNIT 119 - SYNCHRONIZER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 101.18 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.01 70473 UNIT 233 - ASSEMBLY SWITCH UNIT 233 - ASSEMBLY SWITCH 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 102.11 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.09 70610 UNIT 237 - SEATBELT ASSEMBLY UNIT 237 - SEATBELT ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 120.38 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.71 70619 UNIT 237 - THERMOSTAT, SEAL UNIT 237 - THERMOSTAT, SEAL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.90 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.59 70627 UNIT 237 - MOTOR ASSEMBLY UNIT 237 - MOTOR ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 55.91 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.98 Page: 27 Packet Page 50 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95079 3/22/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 95080 3/22/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 70999 UNTI 25 - TOUCHUP PAINT UNTI 25 - TOUCHUP PAINT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.88 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.79 Total : 752.37 12043873 WATER INVENTORY - - WATER INVENTORY - - 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 50.40 W-I NSRT-02-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 55.20 W-SADLCI-08-040 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 231.00 W -CLM PC I-04-050 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 184.98 W-TEEBR-01-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 108.00 W-SETTER-01-012 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 426.28 W -S ETTE RC K-01-012 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,325.70 W-CPLGCI-06-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 338.70 60 FT ROLLS - W-PIPECO-0.75-01' 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 2,154.00 60 FT ROLLS- W-PIPECO-01-011 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,410.00 NON INVENTORY - 4" COMPACT E 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 127.12 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 553.02 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.19 Page: 28 Packet Page 51 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95080 3/22/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC (Continued) 12049738 WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTER WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTER 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 639.42 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 56.27 12051342 WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTER- WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTER- 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 106.57 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 9.38 Total : 7,787.23 95081 3/22/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 5651-11 INV#5651-11 - EDMONDS PD 2465/QUESTIONAIRE REVIEW- 001.000.410.521.400.410.00 32.00 Total : 32.00 95082 3/22/2007 066233 HIGHLINE MEDICAL ENTERPRISES 02/28/2007 INV#02/28/2007 LM00268961 EDMC DIVER'S PHYSICAL 02/01/2007 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 400.00 Total : 400.00 95083 3/22/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1066931 FAC - PLUNGER, WIRE STRIP, SUF FAC - PLUNGER, WIRE STRIP, SUF 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.90 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.02 1075542 FAC MAINT - TRUCK TOOLS - 3PC FAC MAINT - TRUCK TOOLS - 3PC 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 52.82 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.65 Page: 29 Packet Page 52 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95083 3/22/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 2584771 UNIT 474 - SUPPLIES UNIT 474 - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.21 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.27 3032250 LIBRARY - WOOD SUPPLIES LIBRARY - WOOD SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 38.98 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.43 3043079 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES LIBRARY - SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.36 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.21 3043845 FAC - FOAM BRUSH, BRUSH ASSC FAC - FOAM BRUSH, BRUSH ASSC 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.09 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.12 3074431 PW - BALL VALVE PW - BALL VALVE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.49 34075 LIBRARY - MOISTURE ABSORBER! LIBRARY - MOISTURE ABSORBER! 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.33 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.96 3585641 WATER - COMPACTOR MOUNT WATER - COMPACTOR MOUNT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 22.58 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.99 Page: 30 Packet Page 53 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95083 3/22/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 42455 STREET- MINERAL SPIRIRTS STREET- MINERAL SPIRIRTS 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 17.58 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.55 5094282 FAC - HEM QT ROUND FAC - HEM QT ROUND 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.84 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.34 593098 UNIT 476 - SUPPLIES UNIT 476 - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 67.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.05 6031659 FAC - EXT TUBES, P-TRAPS, BRAS FAC - EXT TUBES, P-TRAPS, BRAS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 63.88 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.62 6031696 PS - WOOD, LIQUID NAILS, SUPPL PS - WOOD, LIQUID NAILS, SUPPL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 737.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 64.90 6043616 FAC - SPRAY PAINT, STAIN FAC - SPRAY PAINT, STAIN 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.87 6249226 FAC - RETURNED BRASSCRAFT FAC - RETURNED BRASSCRAFT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -15.76 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -1.44 Page: 31 Packet Page 54 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95083 3/22/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 6596766 FAC MAINT - TERRY TOWEL SUPP FAC MAINT - TERRY TOWEL SUPP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.87 7042753 FAC - P TRAPS, BRASSCRAFT, WA FAC - P TRAPS, BRASSCRAFT, WA 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 67.15 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.91 7042776 FAC MAINT - C CLAMPS, JIGSAW E FAC MAINT - C CLAMPS, JIGSAW E 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.02 UNIT 5 -BASIN PLUGS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.52 7066480 FAC MAINT - PLIERS FAC MAINT - PLIERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.56 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.93 7579917 FAC MAINT - SNOWBRUSH FAC MAINT - SNOWBRUSH 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.97 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.35 8032849 SEWER - GRINDER PUMP WASH E SEWER - GRINDER PUMP WASH E 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.96 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.52 Page: 32 Packet Page 55 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95083 3/22/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 8043431 FAC - POWER GRABBER, DOOR S FAC - POWER GRABBER, DOOR S' 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 42.63 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.75 8597314 UNIT 475 - SUPPLIES UNIT 475 - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 45.46 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.00 9034181 SEWER - 1/4" MASONRY SEWER - 1/4" MASONRY 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.29 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.20 9035699 STORM - WORK GLOVES STORM - WORK GLOVES 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 19.92 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 1.75 9035719 PS - TROWELS, TRASHCAN, SUPP PS - TROWELS, TRASHCAN, SUPP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.82 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.38 9038001 STORM - SAWZALL BLADES STORM - SAWZALL BLADES 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 14.97 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 1.32 9585053 WATER - ADAPTERS, SWIVELS, St WATER - ADAPTERS, SWIVELS, St 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 62.70 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.52 Page: 33 Packet Page 56 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95083 3/22/2007 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) Total : 1,669.58 95084 3/22/2007 069890 HOOVER, TIM 510-2266 ALS TRAVEL MILEAGE Wenatchee conf 001.000.510.526.100.430.00 111.55 Total : 111.55 95085 3/22/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17458 E5AC.92nd/234th Testing E5AC.92nd/234th Testing 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 851.00 17461 E5JA.2005 Waterline Testing E5JA.2005 Waterline Testing 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 2,654.51 Total : 3,505.51 95086 3/22/2007 064655 INNOVAC H 14040 PS - CHANGE FILTER AND CLEAN PS - CHANGE FILTER AND CLEAN 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 625.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 55.63 Total : 680.63 95087 3/22/2007 063370 IVANJACK, SUSAN 033107 TRAVEL EXPENSE REFUNDED TRAVEL EXPENSE REFUNDED 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 33.90 Total : 33.90 95088 3/22/2007 071564 JANISON DDS, JB 131127 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT Refund of employee parking 121.000.000.322.900.000.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 95089 3/22/2007 015270 JONES CHEMICALS INC 339169 54278825 HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,048.57 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 268.27 Page: 34 Packet Page 57 of 202 vchlist 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 35 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95089 3/22/2007 015270 015270 JONES CHEMICALS INC (Continued) Total : 3,316.84 95090 3/22/2007 016211 KESSELRING GUN SHOP 10325 INV#10325 EDMONDS PD SAFARILAND TACTICAL HOLSTER; 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 315.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 7.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 25.20 Total : 347.20 95091 3/22/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 75093 OPS UNIFORM Bailey 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 421.90 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 37.13 75419 ALS UNIFORM Beardsley boots 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 170.90 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 0.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 15.11 75827 ALS UNIFORM Schleicher Chukka boots 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 124.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 10.96 Total : 781.25 95092 3/22/2007 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 314941-001 Black printhead & cleaner Page: 35 Packet Page 58 of 202 vchlist 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 36 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95092 3/22/2007 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC (Continued) Black printhead & cleaner 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 238.00 Magenta printhead & cleaner 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 119.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 31.77 Total : 388.77 95093 3/22/2007 062814 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 306293 UNIT 719 - PARTS AND REPAIR UNIT 719 - PARTS AND REPAIR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 136.45 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.80 Total : 137.25 95094 3/22/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1009309052 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES eye & ear protection 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 280.40 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 14.08 Total : 294.48 95095 3/22/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 3007-184 MOWER SUPPLIES MOWER NUTS, BOLTS & WELD 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 113.32 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.49 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.20 Page: 36 Packet Page 59 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95095 3/22/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY (Continued) 3007-199 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES FUEL FILTER BOWL 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.05 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.14 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.44 Total : 154.64 95096 3/22/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 556321 UNIT M16 -OIL, FILTERS UNIT M16 -OIL, FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 102.52 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.12 556426 UNIT M16 - OIL FILTERS UNIT M16 - OIL FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.78 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.14 Total : 125.56 95097 3/22/2007 060246 M & M BALLOON CO T-4585 Fee to pick up tank Fee to pick up tank 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 9.50 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 0.85 Total : 10.35 95098 3/22/2007 071481 MADSEN-LANGTON, BROOKE MADSEN-LANGTON0326 BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER @ E 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 80.00 Total : 80.00 95099 3/22/2007 071401 MALMSTEN, KATHERINE MALMSTEN7605 CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES Page: 37 Packet Page 60 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95099 3/22/2007 071401 MALMSTEN, KATHERINE (Continued) SEQUENTIAL CALLIGRAPHY CLAS 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,267.50 Total : 1,267.50 95100 3/22/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 2932 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 90.00 2933 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 2939 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 2941 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 90.00 Total : 270.00 95101 3/22/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 61164506 123106800 C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 208.04 Freight 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 4.32 Total : 212.36 95102 3/22/2007 070660 MICHELS CORPORATION 07-2023 70605 C-161 CHEMICAL GROUT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 5,440.00 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 484.16 Total : 5,924.16 95103 3/22/2007 063773 MICROFLEX 00016946 Tax Audit Program thru 2/28/07 Tax Audit Program thru 2/28/07 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 166.00 Page: 38 Packet Page 61 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95103 3/22/2007 063773 063773 MICROFLEX (Continued) Total : 166.00 95104 3/22/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 41529 BAND SHELL 641 - RENTAL OF SA) BAND SHELL 641 - RENTAL OF SA) 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 62.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.52 Total : 67.52 95105 3/22/2007 021365 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE F1595825-000 CUSTOMER # 400034446 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 001.000.390.592.190.840.00 1,429.84 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 126.000.390.592.190.840.00 643.79 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 111.000.653.592.420.840.00 110.74 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 414.000.656.592.380.840.00 3,218.92 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 411.000.652.592.380.840.00 2,679.76 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 411.000.654.592.340.840.00 74.02 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 411.000.655.592.350.840.00 88.53 Professional Sery 2007 Oblig Bonds 411.000.652.592.380.840.00 29.40 Total : 8,275.00 95106 3/22/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0322538-IN FLEET INVENTORY - FILTERS FLEET INVENTORY - FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 60.83 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 5.23 Page: 39 Packet Page 62 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95106 3/22/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued) 0323560-IN FLEET INVENTORY - FILTERS FLEET INVENTORY - FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 84.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 7.28 Total : 157.94 95107 3/22/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1357497.001 2091 C-264 CONDUIT INSTALLATION 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,136.30 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 97.72 Total : 1,234.02 95108 3/22/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0437244 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 0437245 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 0438126 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36 0439203 HONEY BUCKET CREDIT CREDIT FOR POOR SERVICE 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 -10.00 Total : 276.08 95109 3/22/2007 071576 NORTHWEST RECREATION OF WA 60-521121 SKATE PARK COMPONENTS CONCRETE MODULAR SKATE PAF 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 65,450.00 Freight 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 9,800.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 6,697.25 Page: 40 Packet Page 63 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95109 3/22/2007 071576 071576 NORTHWEST RECREATION OF WF (Continued) Total : 81,947.25 95110 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 543482 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 211.13 Total : 211.13 95111 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 526126 Office Supplies - HR Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 32.80 Service Charge 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 2.88 590144 Office Supply return Office Supply return 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 -21.22 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 -1.86 729590 Office Supplies - C. Cruz Office Supplies - C. Cruz 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 86.67 Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 3.48 Office Supplies - HR, MY 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 18.04 Office Supplies - HR, MY 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 18.03 King County Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 7.62 King County Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 1.89 King County Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 1.59 Total : 150.92 Page: 41 Packet Page 64 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95112 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 95113 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 370320 Zippered Notepad holder Zippered Notepad holder 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 47.03 Pens - returned 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 13.59 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 4.14 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.19 664492 Clip Board Clip Board 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 3.00 Pens 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 6.18 Freight 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 0.33 Freight 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 0.67 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 0.27 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 0.54 676580 Speakers Speakers 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 12.77 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 1.12 739619 Return pens Original Inv 370320 Return pens Original Inv 370320 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 -13.59 King County Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 -1.19 Total : 76.05 11 WiY3a 520437 Page: 42 Packet Page 65 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95113 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) PENS/PENCILS/CALCULATORS/CU 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 128.86 King County Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 11.35 Total : 140.21 95114 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 544317 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 165.19 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 14.54 668926 OFFICE SUPPLIES Minute Book supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 120.70 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 10.62 671803 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 80.41 King County Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 7.08 Total : 398.54 95115 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 568591 Office supplies for Council Office Office supplies for Council Office 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 36.58 702213 Notebooks/indexes for Council Retre� Notebooks/indexes for Council Retre, 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 117.44 Total : 154.02 95116 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 667128 ADMIN SUPPLIES Page: 43 Packet Page 66 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95116 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) Admin office supplies 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 167.27 King County Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 14.72 Total : 181.99 95117 3/22/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 617594 INV#617594 ACCT#520437 250POL DYMO LABELER TAPES 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 32.40 SHARPIE CD MARKERS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 5.33 CASE OF PACKING TAPE 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 121.68 BOISE X-9 PAPER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 149.45 CD SLEEVE ENVELOPES 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 35.65 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 17.17 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 13.15 659697 INV#659697 ACCT#520437 250POL G CREDIT FOR WRONG MEMO BOOI 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 -16.62 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 -1.47 659717 INV#659717 ACCT#520437 250POL POCKET MEMO BOOKS (2 DOZ) 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 25.10 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.00 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.21 Total : 385.05 Page: 44 Packet Page 67 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95118 3/22/2007 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER Jan 07 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI Emergency Medical Services & Traur 001.000.000.237.120.000.00 781.69 PSEA 1, 2,3 Account 001.000.000.237.130.000.00 17,758.01 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.000.237.150.000.00 421.50 State Patrol Death Investigations 001.000.000.237.170.000.00 729.78 Judicial Information Systems Accoun 001.000.000.237.180.000.00 1,959.43 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.000.237.200.000.00 163.14 Total : 21,813.55 95119 3/22/2007 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 656905 Legal services - Legislative Legal services - Legislative 001.000.110.511.100.410.00 2,345.00 Total : 2,345.00 95120 3/22/2007 068282 OLYMPIC FLY FISHERS OLYMPICFLY7601 FLY TYING CLASS BEGINNING FLY TYING CLASS- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 212.80 Total : 212.80 95121 3/22/2007 064645 OLYMPIC MECHANICAL INC 043646/043645 Refund of bldg permit fees Olympic Refund of bldg permit fees Olympic 001.000.000.322.100.000.00 180.00 Refund of City surcharge for bld pern 001.000.000.321.930.000.00 30.00 Total : 210.00 95122 3/22/2007 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 220469 Copier Maint. for PW Page: 45 Packet Page 68 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 46 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95122 3/22/2007 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION (Continued) Copier Maint. for PW 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 111.86 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 9.96 Total : 121.82 95123 3/22/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 870204 TOPDRESS MIX TOPSOIL LAWN TOPDRESS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 315.30 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 27.11 Total : 342.41 95124 3/22/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 42550 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 160.00 42556 STORM - DUMP FEES STORM - DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 160.00 42564 STORM DUMP FEES STORM DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 110.00 Total : 430.00 95125 3/22/2007 027155 PARK SEED WHOLESALE 20136783 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2007 FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 525.50 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 62.81 20137910 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2007 FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 223.80 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 40.00 Page: 46 Packet Page 69 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 47 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95125 3/22/2007 027155 027155 PARK SEED WHOLESALE (Continued) Total : 852.11 95126 3/22/2007 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC. 521646 PS - CARPET SHIELD PS - CARPET SHIELD 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.02 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.14 Total : 26.16 95127 3/22/2007 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK7498 WIGGLES & GIGGLES WIGGLES & GIGGLES #7498 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 441.00 PECK7527 STRETCH & SCULPT STRETCH & SCULPT #7527 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 380.80 Total : 821.80 95128 3/22/2007 066381 PERRINVILLE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 0248283 INV#0248283 EDMONDS IMPOUND THREE DAYS BOARD @ VET 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 96.00 TECHNICIAN SUPERVISION 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 44.00 MEDICATIONS 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 61.03 EUTHANIZE DOG 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 36.70 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 0.41 Total : 238.14 95129 3/22/2007 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS 2/26-3/21/07 PW - FOOD FOR TRAINING MEETII Page: 47 Packet Page 70 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 48 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95129 3/22/2007 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) PW - FOOD FOR TRAINING MEETII 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 14.15 PW - LUNCH WITH D.O.E - N MILLE 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 8.73 STREET - CDL ENDORESEMTN - C 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 30.00 STORM/STREET/WATER/SEWER - 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 3.34 STORM/STREET/WATER/SEWER - 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 3.34 STORM/STREET/WATER/SEWER - 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.34 STORM/STREET/WATER/SEWER - 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.33 FEB 07 MILEAGE - S FISHER 411.000.654.537.900.430.00 28.13 WATER QUALITY - VINEGAR FOR' 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 19.74 UNIT 93 - LICENSE FEES 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 29.75 Total : 143.85 95130 3/22/2007 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100-MR07 DM1000 MAILING SYSTEM LEASE 250-00140 DM1000 Mailing System Lease- 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 792.00 Total : 792.00 95131 3/22/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS O4371 UNIT F1 B1 FUEL Fire Boat - SVC FEE 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 10.00 Fire Boat - Fuel FEB 07 511.000.657.548.680.320.00 620.04 Total : 630.04 95132 3/22/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATEF Page: 48 Packet Page 71 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 49 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95132 3/22/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS (Continued) Pier Electricity for FEB 07 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 44.70 Stromwater Rent & Leasehold tax- 411.000.652.542.900.510.00 482.83 Total : 527.53 95133 3/22/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 6539 OPS SUPPLIES bird spike adhesive 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 24.58 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.18 6679 OPS SUPPLIES Marine 16 fender 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 81.68 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 7.27 Total : 115.71 95134 3/22/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2422756 alarm monitoring for Library/PLAZA- alarm monitoring for Library/PLAZA- 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 174.00 730531 PW ALARM MONITORING 24 hour alarm monitoring PW- 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 21.00 24 hour alarm monitoring PW- 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 21.00 24 hour alarm monitoring PW- 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 18.38 24 hour alarm monitoring PW- 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 23.63 24 hour alarm monitoring PW- 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 10.50 24 hour alarm monitoring PW- 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 10.49 Page: 49 Packet Page 72 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 50 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95134 3/22/2007 064088 064088 PROTECTION ONE (Continued) Total : 279.00 95135 3/22/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANI 0014712-IN EDMCITW HIGH TEMP GLOVES/SLEEVES/API 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 131.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 7.64 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 11.69 Total : 150.73 95136 3/22/2007 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL 3003805-B STORM - STREET SWEEPING REF STORM - STREET SWEEPING REF 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 4,750.63 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 171.02 Total : 4,921.65 95137 3/22/2007 071568 RIES, JEFFREY RIES0315 REFUND REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 250.00 Total : 250.00 95138 3/22/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412225734 STREET - ASPHALT STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 31.68 9412234840 STREET -ASPHALT STREET -ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 31.68 Page: 50 Packet Page 73 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 51 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95138 3/22/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 9412246780 STREET - ASPHALT STREET -ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 270.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 23.76 9412286389 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT FOR P WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT FOR P 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 250.00 WATER/SEWER - ASPHALT FOR P 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 250.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 22.00 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 22.00 9412310106 WATER/SEWER -ASPHALT FOR P/ WATER/SEWER -ASPHALT FOR Pf 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 360.00 WATER/SEWER -ASPHALT FOR Pf 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 31.68 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 31.68 9412310111 WATER/SEWER ASPHALT FOR PA WATER/SEWER ASPHALT FOR PA 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 360.00 WATER/SEWER ASPHALT FOR PA 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 360.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 31.68 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 31.68 Page: 51 Packet Page 74 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 52 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95138 3/22/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS (Continued) 9412310116 STORM - WASHED SAND STORM - WASHED SAND 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 150.36 ASPHALT DUMPED 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 313.44 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 12.10 Total : 3,663.74 95139 3/22/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY SAWDON0317 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR PLAZA ROOM MONITOR- 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 105.00 Total : 105.00 95140 3/22/2007 061482 SEA -WESTERN INC 113978 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING Yoakum coat & pant 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 1,360.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 7.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 120.34 Total : 1,487.84 95141 3/22/2007 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 54564 UNIT 24 - WASHDOWN GUN, CUFF UNIT 24 - WASHDOWN GUN, CUFF 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 958.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 103.79 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 93.44 Total : 1,155.23 95142 3/22/2007 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 1071094 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 351.64 Page: 52 Packet Page 75 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 53 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95142 3/22/2007 036509 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC (Continued) Total : 351.64 95143 3/22/2007 070990 SIMS, DON 1st qtr 2007 First Qtr Mileage Reimbursement First Qtr Mileage Reimbursement 001.000.620.532.200.430.00 147.93 Total : 147.93 95144 3/22/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0058454-IN UNIT 100 - CHROME FLANGE UNIT 100 - CHROME FLANGE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.50 Total : 21.50 95145 3/22/2007 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 1-585383 UNIT 96 - ELEC BRAKE CONTROL UNIT 96 - ELEC BRAKE CONTROL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 72.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.24 Total : 78.84 95146 3/22/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2470011830 PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,425.55 3280017173 PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 352.52 3690017839 PLAYFIELD LIGHTS PLAYFIELD LIGHTS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 104.21 5070014245 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74 Total : 1,912.02 95147 3/22/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2400010746 LIFT STATION #10 Page: 53 Packet Page 76 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 54 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95147 3/22/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) LIFT STATION #10 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 171.90 2410016253 LIFT STATION #2 LIFT STATION #2 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 72.24 3970013581 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.77 Total : 272.91 95148 3/22/2007 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 349 Q2-2007 SnoCom Communications Q2-2007 SnoCom Communications 001.000.410.528.600.510.00 130,342.28 Q2-2007 SnoCom Communications 001.000.510.528.600.510.00 46,550.81 Q2-2007 SnoCom Communications 411.000.654.534.800.510.00 9,310.16 Total : 186,203.25 95149 3/22/2007 071567 SNOHOMISH COUNTY SOCCER SNOCOSOCCER0315 REFUND REFUND DUE TO MALFUNCTIONIN 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 24.00 Total : 24.00 95150 3/22/2007 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2007020 INV#2007020 EDMONDS PD FEBRUARY 2007 BOOKINGS 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 3,672.97 FEBRUARY PRISONER DAYS 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 32,199.94 Total : 35,872.91 95151 3/22/2007 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER Jan 07 Crime Victims Crime Victims 001.000.000.237.140.000.00 607.68 Total : 607.68 Page: 54 Packet Page 77 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 55 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95152 3/22/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4108285-01 UNIFORM/BOOT SAVERS UNIFORM/BOOT SAVERS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 72.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.45 4108407-01 5556482-1 UNIFORMS/GARCIA 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 269.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 23.94 4108743-01 2454 UNIFORM/AMBURGEY 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 272.54 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 24.26 4108744-01 UNIFORM/AMBURGEY UNIFORM/AMBURGEY 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 52.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 4.67 Total : 725.86 95153 3/22/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4108627-01 STREET - WORK LEVIS - C HIATT STREET - WORK LEVIS - C HIATT 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 46.50 WORK LEVIS - C HIATT 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 132.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 15.89 Total : 194.39 95154 3/22/2007 062280 SOUND SEAL & PACKING CO 11403 SPLIT MECHANICAL SEAL Page: 55 Packet Page 78 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 56 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95154 3/22/2007 062280 SOUND SEAL & PACKING CO (Continued) SPLIT MECHANICAL SEAL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3,355.43 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 37.68 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 301.99 Total : 3,695.10 95155 3/22/2007 070677 SPRINT 03/07/07 03/07/07 INVOICE - 0620014133-1 E PHONES 001.000.410.521.220.420.00 199.98 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.420.00 20.46 Total : 220.44 95156 3/22/2007 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO April 2007 APRIL 2007 STANDARD INSURANC 04/07 Standard Insurance 811.000.000.231.550.000.00 18,798.22 Total : 18,798.22 95157 3/22/2007 067835 T-MOBILE 135840772 CELL PHONE USEAGE PARK MAINTENANCE CELL PHONE 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 85.44 Total : 85.44 95158 3/22/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18793891 SUPPLIES WASHERS, NUTS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.22 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.98 Total : 24.20 95159 3/22/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10499341 SHOP - ELECT SUPPLIES Page: 56 Packet Page 79 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 57 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95159 3/22/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) SHOP - ELECT SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 40.36 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.59 10499342 STORM - ORANGE DEGREE NORT STORM - ORANGE DEGREE NORT 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 236.92 ORANGE DEGREE NORTH BIB OVI 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 59.23 ORANGE DEGREE NORTH RAINCC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 200.77 ORANGE DEGREE NORTH RAINCC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 133.85 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 56.14 Total : 730.86 95160 3/22/2007 070578 TEL WEST COMMUNICATIONS 813771 C/A 23872 PR1-2 City Phone Service 3/10-4/10/ 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 740.84 Total : 740.84 95161 3/22/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1481668 E7FC.RFQ Lake Ballinger Level Stud E7FC.RFQ Lake Ballinger Level Stud 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 54.72 Total : 54.72 95162 3/22/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1485880 NEWSPAPER AD Ordinance 3630 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 22.32 Total : 22.32 95163 3/22/2007 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 4/11/2007-4/10/2008 INV 4/11/2007-4/10/2008 EDMONDS YEAR SUBSCRIPTION 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 141.00 Page: 57 Packet Page 80 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 58 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95163 3/22/2007 065459 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION (Continued) Total : 141.00 95164 3/22/2007 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 201368 FAC - 34 IN DOOR W/GLOBAL HDV FAC - 34 IN DOOR W/GLOBAL HDV 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 211.28 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 50.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.99 202017 PW - HYDRANT WALL PW - HYDRANT WALL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 205.37 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.32 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.89 Total : 517.85 95165 3/22/2007 071569 THOMPSON, MARILYN THOMPSON0308 REFUND REFUND - MEDICAL 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 45.00 Total : 45.00 95166 3/22/2007 069861 TRAINING COMMISSION 2006 EDITION 2 COPIES 2006 EDITION RCW 2 COPIES SELECTED RCWS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 36.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3.02 Total : 39.02 95167 3/22/2007 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 13041 FAC MAINT - KEY BLANKS FAC MAINT - KEY BLANKS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.34 Total : 16.34 Page: 58 Packet Page 81 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 59 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95168 3/22/2007 065934 TUNE TALES TUNETALES7696 MUSIC CLASSES TUNE TALES #7696- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 916.30 TUNE TALES #7698- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 740.60 TUNE TALES #7697- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,081.50 Total : 2,738.40 95169 3/22/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7376621 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES HAND PUMP, COUPLINGS, ELLS, C 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 384.29 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 34.21 7376708 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PVC BUSHES, ELLS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.10 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.81 Total : 428.41 95170 3/22/2007 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE 3/19/07 Bulk Mailing cost - City Newsletter 4/1 Bulk Mailing cost - City Newsletter 4/1 001.000.240.513.110.420.00 2,700.00 Total : 2,700.00 95171 3/22/2007 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 7029067 utility locates - utility locates- 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 40.00 utility locates- 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 40.00 utility locates- 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 40.00 Total : 120.00 95172 3/22/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHIN Page: 59 Packet Page 82 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 60 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95172 3/22/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHIN 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 50.87 425-775-2645 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.640.575.510.420.00 60.23 Total : 111.10 95173 3/22/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425.775.2525 CITY HALL DIRECTORY LISTING City Hall Directory Listing 3/7-4/7/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 3.58 425-AB8-2844 POLICE T1 LINE Police T1 Line 3/10-4/10/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 374.01 Total : 377.59 95174 3/22/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0423 03 0260 1032797592 07 AFTER HOURS PHONE 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 58.86 Total : 58.86 95175 3/22/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM LIBRARY SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88 425-672-7132 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 56.45 425-775-1534 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 159.71 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 296.60 425-775-7865 Radio Line between Public Works & I Radio Line between Public Works & I 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 50.24 Page: 60 Packet Page 83 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 61 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95175 3/22/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) 425-RTO-9133 Public Works Connection to 911 Public Works Connection to 911 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48 Public Works Connection to 911 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78 Total : 687.38 95176 3/22/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2120035979 Mayor's cell ph (425) 238-1007 Mayor's cell ph (425) 238-1007 001.000.210.513.100.420.00 122.81 Gary Haakenson cell phone (425) 001.000.210.513.100.420.00 13.37 Total : 136.18 95177 3/22/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 425-706-3334 C/A 370106564-00002 Cell Phone Jim Stevens 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 49.80 464229910-1 206-999-9374 sewer lead cell phone 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 67.82 570091643-00001 CELL PHONE -STREET LEAD CELL PHONE -STREET LEAD 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 33.80 964212899-00001 206-947-3220 cell phone water quality 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 82.25 Page: 61 Packet Page 84 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 62 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 95177 3/22/2007 067865 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) Total : 233.67 95178 3/22/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2120312808 OPS COMMUNICATIONS Air Card 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 60.74 Total : 60.74 95179 3/22/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 29683397 1066294 FILTERS/BUFFER/GLOVES 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 444.12 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 39.54 Total : 483.66 95180 3/22/2007 006284 W S DARLEY AND CO PM636906 UNIT 476 - NUT -CAP, BALL KIT UNIT 476 - NUT -CAP, BALL KIT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 217.92 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.39 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.39 Total : 248.70 95181 3/22/2007 062011 WATERS, MICHAEL Waters Prof Sery - Wireless Router set up Prof Sery - Wireless Router set up 001.000.110.511.100.410.00 40.00 Total : 40.00 95182 3/22/2007 026510 WCIA 700605-0001 E7FB.Hinrichs Cl No GCO25231 E7FB.Hinrichs Cl No GCO25231 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,195.00 Total : 1,195.00 95183 3/22/2007 064251 WSATI - NW PLOEGER 2007 AUTO THEFT SCHOOL/REGM PLOEGER/REGISTRATION- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 175.00 Page: 62 Packet Page 85 of 202 vchlist Voucher List Page: 63 03/22/2007 2:22:55PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 95183 3/22/2007 064251 064251 WSATI - NW 180 Vouchers for bank code : front 180 Vouchers in this report Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total Bank total Total vouchers Amount 175.00 833,409.80 833,409.80 Page: 63 Packet Page 86 of 202 AM-894 2. D. Claims for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Linda Hynd, City Clerk's Office Submitted For: Sandy Chase Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Carol Franklin (amount undetermined) and Timothy Cipolla (amount undetermined). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative Claims for Damages have been received from the following individuals: Carol Franklin 730 Dayton Street Edmonds, WA 98020 (Amount undetermined) Timothy Cipolla 20412 28th Place West Lynnwood, WA 98036 (Amount undetermined) Link: Franklin Claim for Damaaes Link: Cipolla Claim for Damaaes Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/20/2007 09:08 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/20/2007 10:06 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/21/2007 03:18 PM APRV Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 03/20/2007 07:44 AM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2007 Packet Page 87 of 202 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS MAR 19 2007 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES; FORM EDM NDS (Wff � - ecero Please take note that CQ r n �� Q l'7 � � who resides at � ,3 � ,JQ� mailing address S�q r ' home hone #42S `77 k 5�S") work hone # P P -r-Sd. it Pre� , is claiming damages against C fT _ chvh,-3 in the sum of $ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: ( 2 O 7, TIME: 3 G Q , LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: DESCRIPTION. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. EIRM- 7 - • yn (attach an extra sheet f (r additional inform a ion, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: �Q �-s%� �� Id - - D z %0 / / 3 $` g 3 5 - - * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY *' License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Packet Page 88 of 202 * *.NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED ra , t h Caro h ► ' 1 being first duly sworn, depose and say that. I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washingto County ofp,_ I certify. that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ca the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and Dated: purposes mention d in the instrument. II !!i�ii3O �'1 k l�lf oA �= Signature \ ' c N�TgR y Am Title ` �L I C y �� My appointment expires �� -'0 o c......... WASO\ If�tt Packet Page 89 of 202 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM RECEIVED MCUAP27y E Please take note that _ " rt RA0-TiA j( G i ez)Lt-A who resides at -TN 9mailing address �� ''{ ? 112_ home phone # work phone # is claimirig damages against in the sum of $vN Ar1O W,-J arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: 5LjA/*t)pr--( S — 11_0-7 TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. Pis i.�y€_ Pacfi l_ 1 Jr'C� Pel A- rr C- A A 2 51,7 q 26TN (lL w7 (a SaE291AJAJS �G S� PA& 6��i GEC. I �F4 �� t � ��P?r.� � � auk IMF rslC�^� � � /; ►y� u� � LS GA,�—r (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes —,V, No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: _ * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY Driver License # (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Packet Page 90 of 202 * *.NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED being first duly swom, depose arid say that I am the claimant for the above described; that 1 have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. Signature of Claimant(s) State of Wash' gton ' County of I certify, that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �Tirool-z/✓ (7/PC LLtI is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: D % Signa re � s s 0 t A A Title My appointment expires D • Packet Page 91 of 202 AM-896 2.E. Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Improvements Acceptance Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For: Dave Gebert Time: Consent Department: Engineering Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Report on final construction costs for the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Improvements project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Improvements project and appropriate $22,730 from Fund 130 ending cash balance for the project. Previous Council Action On November 1, 2005, Council awarded a contract for the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Improvements project to Ohno Construction, Inc. in the amount of $710,464. Narrative The Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Improvements project is complete. The project was designed by WCA Northwest and was inspected and accepted by Staff. Project Budget - $800,000 Project Costs: Consultant (WCA Northwest) - $8,876 Contractor (Ohno Construction) - $798,519 Testing (HWA Geosciences) - $7,900 1 % Arts - $7,105 Advertising - $330 Total Project Costs - $822,730 The project budget at time of award was $800,000. The Parks and Recreation Director has monitored the expenditures and has kept the Cemetery Board apprised of the expenditures throughout construction. The final costs have been reviewed with and approved by the Cemetery Board. Therefore, Staff recommends that Council appropriate an additional $22,730 from Fund 130 (Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement) ending cash balance and accept the project. There are sufficient funds in Fund 130 ending cash balance to fund this appropriation. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 03/21/2007 01:49 PM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/21/2007 02:12 PM APRV 3 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 03/21/2007 02:56 PM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/21/2007 03:18 PM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/21/2007 03:56 PM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/21/2007 04:46 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 03/21/2007 12:33 PM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2007 Packet Page 92 of 202 AM-895 2007 Street Overlay Program Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Dave Gebert, Engineering Department: Engineering Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Agenda Memo Subiect Title Authorization to call for bids for the 2007 Street Overlay program. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council authorize Staff to call for bids for the 2007 Street Overlay program. Previous Council Action NA Time: Consent Type: Action 2.F. Narrative The design for the 2007 Street Overlay Program is nearing completion. In addition to street overlays, this year we are including some street patching, walkway/crosswalk and ADA curb ramp improvements, C-curb installation, and parks paving improvements (Mathay Ballinger sport court and Civic Center access road) in the invitation for bids. The 2007 adopted budget includes the following amounts for the transportation projects included in the bid documents: Fund 1 I I Street Patching $25,000 Fund 112: Overlays - Utility Streets $320,000 Walkways & Bikeways Citywide $15,000 Street Improvements Citywide $15,000 Fund 125 (REST 2 - Transportation): Overlays — Citywide $550,000 ADA Curb Ramp Improvements $20,000 In addition, Fund 125 (REET2 — Parks Improvement) includes sufficient funds in the adopted 2007 budget for Citywide Park Improvements/Miscellaneous Small Projects and for Citywide Beautification to cover the estimated $25,000 for the Parks projects included in the bid documents. A major road included in the overlay project this year is 76th Avenue West, from 212th Street SW to 220th Street SW. This work will require extensive coordination with Stevens Hospital and other medical clinics and businesses along 76th Avenue W. and may require work at night and/or on weekends. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/21/2007 12:36 PM APRV 2 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 03/21/2007 01:20 PM APRV 3 Public Works Noel Miller 03/21/2007 04:35 PM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/21/2007 04:46 PM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/21/2007 04:57 PM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 08:28 AM APRV Form Started By: Dave Gebert Started On: 03/20/2007 05:32 PM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 93 of 202 Packet Page 94 of 202 AM-897 2.G. Old Woodway Elementary School Demolition Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Brian McIntosh, Parks and Recreation Time: Consent Department: Parks and Recreation Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Authorization to call for bids for the abatement and demolition of the Old Woodway Elementary School located at 23700 104th Avenue West. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council authorize Staff to call for bids for the abatement and demolition of the Old Woodway Elementary School located at 23700 104th Place West. Previous Council Action Purchase of property for the purpose of establishing a neighborhood park. Narrative Development of comprehensive specifications for the abatement of hazardous materials and the demolition of the school buildings have been completed. Shortly after the purchase of this site by the City the consulting firm EHS International conducted abatement surveys to determine locations of hazardous materials and two underground storage tanks (UST's). Using this survey, specifications for the safe removal and disposition of these materials were developed by the consultant. On November 3, 2006, an engineering firm, Reid Middleton, was selected to prepare specifications for the demolition of the buildings and work with EHS International to incorporate the abatement, UST removal, and building demolition into one set of specifications. Staff and consultants felt that this project is of significant scope and will attract larger demolition companies with in-house abatement divisions. Funding for this project is included in the adopted 2007 capital budget for Fund 125 (REET2 - Parks Improvement) No file(s) attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 03/21/2007 01:58 PM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/21/2007 02:13 PM APRV 3 Admin Services Dan Clements 03/22/2007 06:48 AM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 07:52 AM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 08:27 AM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 08:28 AM APRV Form Started By: Brian McIntosh Started On: 03/21/2007 12:37 PM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 95 of 202 AM-901 2.1-1. Old Woodway Elementary Master Planning, Park Design & Construction Administration Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/ 27/ 2007 Submitted By: Brian McIntosh, Parks and Recreation Time: Consent Department: Parks and Recreation Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects for consulting services for Old Woodway Elementary School Park Master Planning, Design, and Construction Administration Services. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Authorize Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects for consulting services for Old Woodway Elementary Park Master Planning, Design, and Construction Administration Services. Previous Council Action On November 14, 2006, City Council authorized staff to advertise for Statements of Qualification from landscape architectural firms for park design and construction services for the Old Woodway Elementary School site. Narrative Following advertisements in the Herald and Journal of Commerce, staff received 26 requests for information from consulting firms. Eleven firms submitted a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) which were evaluated by staff. Four firms were selected for interview and MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects was selected as the top consultant. The selection team agreed that this firm was strong in all phases of the project from public involvement through design, management, and completion. Reference checks confirmed this conclusion. This firm has successfully designed dozens of neighborhood parks and other public recreation installations in the northwest for the past 35 years. The Project Manager will be Ed MacLeod, Principal, and a founder of the firm. The proposed scope of the project (attachment) identifies several major areas of work including: Park Master Planning (MacLeod Reckord) Park Design & Construction Administration (MacLeod Reckord) Survey & Civil Engineering (PACE Engineering) Arboriculture (Gilles Consulting) Electrical (Sparling Electrical Engineering) Structural (MLA Engineering) The total consultant fee for their complete scope of work from start up to closeout will be $146,917 which is included in the adopted 2007 Capital Budget, Parks Improvement Fund 125 . Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Professional Services Contract MacLeod Link: Old Woodway Scope & Fees - Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 03/22/2007 09:17 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/22/2007 09:31 AM APRV 3 Admin Services Dan Clements 03/22/2007 09:57 AM APRV 4 City Clerk 5 Mayor 6 Final Approval Form Started By: Brian McIntosh Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 10:07 AM APRV Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 12:08 PM APRV Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 01:37 PM APRV Started On: 03/22/2007 07:18 AM Packet Page 96 of 202 Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 97 of 202 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and MacLeod Reckord, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide Master Planning, Park Design, & Construction Administration Services at the Old Woodway Elementary School site, 23700 1041h Ave. W., Edmonds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit A, provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of $ 146,917.00. B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the City Engineer three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle. C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. Packet Page 98 of 202 3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant and shall not be considered public records, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become public records. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and, subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant's negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. 6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage 2 Packet Page 99 of 202 A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State. B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the City. The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin or physical handicap. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written notification to the City and the City's prior written consent. 10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten days in advance of the effective date of said termination. 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document and the Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A. These writings constitute the entire 3 Packet Page 100 of 202 Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Services. 14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the contractor shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: 59 Packet Page 101 of 202 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address: MacLeod Reckord 231 Summit Ave. East Seattle, WA 98102 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. DATED THIS DAY OF , 2007. CITY OF EDMONDS CONSULTANT: By Gary Haakenson, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By Its 5 Packet Page 102 of 202 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2007, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 0 Packet Page 103 of 202 EXHIBIT A OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE Scope of Work February 28, 2007 MacLeod Reckord Tasks: Task I Project Startup Scoping meeting with Owner to discuss procedures, submittal requirements, schedule, and public participation. Review existing site information and coordinate the work of PACE to complete a topographic survey and civil utility design (see attached PACE scope of work). Task 2 Data Collection Collect and document the relevant physical, historical and cultural information needed to inform and advance the master planning process. Initiate the public participation process and document community and user group needs. Coordinate the work of Gilles Consulting to provide an assessment of current vegetative and forest conditions on site (see attached Gillis Consulting scope of work and fees). Coordinate the work of Sparling Electrical and Lighting Engineers (see attached Sparling scope of work and fees). Task 3 Coordination with Demolition Consultants Meet with staff and demolition consultants to discuss advantageous demolition strategies and to identify vegetation, infrastructure and structures to be protected and preserved. Task A Program Development Meet with staff and the community at public meeting # 1 to evaluate and reach consensus on the feasibility of various potential park program elements. Task 5 Master Plan Alternatives Design and illustrate a reasonable range of plan alternatives. Develop preliminary opinion of probable construction cost for each alternative. Review and discuss the alternatives with staff and the public at public meeting 42. Present alternatives and public input to Planning Board and City Council. Task 6 Preliminary Master Plan Prepare a preliminary master plan based on the input from staff, public, Planning Board and City Council. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost for the preliminary plan. Prepare preliminary SEPA and permit Scoping. Review plan and related documents with staff and revise as directed. Present to public at public meeting 93. Task 7 Final Master Plan Prepare the final master plan based on staff comments. Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost and phasing recommendations. Document the master planning process in a brief summary report. Present the final master plan to the Planning Board and to City Council for adoption. Task 8 Phase 1 Desi n Develo meet and Permit Application Design development documents will be developed to fix and describe the size, character, elevation and relationships for all project improvements through plans, sections and Packet Page 104 of 202 elevations, typical construction details, material selections, equipment layouts, and outline specifications. Proposed construction phasing will be tested against design development cost estimates and a first phase construction project will be specifically defined. Design development documents will be reviewed by staff and the public at public meeting #4. Consultant will assist the Owner with necessary permit applications. MacLeod Reckord will coordinate the work of MLA to provide necessary structural calculations and design (see attached MLA scope of work and fees). Task 9 Contract Documents Based on staff and City Council approved design development, produce construction documents for Phase 1 construction consisting of drawings, specifications, and other documents setting forth in detail the requirements for construction, bidding and contracting for construction of the project. The consultant will provide special provisions and technical specifications in APWA, WSDOT format and coordinate Owner provided front end documents. Provide a final opinion of probable construction cost. Submit a 90% review set for review by Owner and provide all necessary changes and corrections as required by Owner review, permit requirements or consultant quality control checking. Task 10 Bidding Assist the Owner with the solicitation of competitive bids for construction of the project including: assistance writing the advertisement to bid, answer bidder's questions, issue required addenda, and attend a pre -bid conference at the site. Task 11 Limited Construction Administration Services The consultant will provide limited construction administration services which include: attend a pre -construction conference, attend weekly on site construction meetings, review contractor submittals, samples, and shop drawing, process change orders as required, review contractor pay requests, answer contractor requests for information, and perform punch list and back check observations. Task 12 Proiect Closeout Assist the Owner with the closeout process including: oversight of the contractor's responsibilities with respect to warranties, release of liens, operation and maintenance manuals and record drawings. Upon approval of redline drawings from the contractor indicating changed conditions from the contract documents, the consultant will convert revisions to project CAD files and submit both hard and electronic copies of the record drawing tiles to the Owner. End of Scope of Work Packet Page 105 of 202 0 fl ]¢- O M CD A 0 r M r N U c r LO to LO to (U Ll! d co LO Z 2 O o " w v w � N a n W cu © U- p I { + i to Lf) © O { I { LO LO Ul) ' 0 O O © m rn OD a)Oo Cr)Cr)Oo COao 00 CO00 W J LLI a,r 69. LL n. Q Q O 0 a 0 o v © t7 0 0 v O 0 0 0 + C v C O v U 0 M N M M ce) Co CO M N m N 0) m m M M N m CD Cfl y 0 CO r U-) r r r (V r r to r to M N M r r Ln M N N (K r N r r r r r d Q to O m O N r kr N M r M d d d U M r- d' r .— r N r r d- •r- d' M N M '-- r- .cj' M N N Z d C SO rn C O N � U ram-• ` N o 0 Q O a r» j (�j c c (D 0 o c ac) 6.0 0 U Q Cu aU "a 0 o p a R. ° O a a) -v O Q cd N U iE? ry Y o fl o a a(v Cu vics o E >uLCu aim Cu W o o a w cn E o w 0) c o C❑ -a E Q c 0 0 N c o c c E a) c E cri tC1 Qa as n M a a a co Lo o a0i b o a) E o o a a) . V o' ra ?G cEn.N E L a) i'a `a a. rn `oc� N � M O � aoad Cu sc n c c c •c O IDano c c -t Q Uiiu i v)Q UUcq[1C Q �S}[ Q wc4aii<C Packet Page 106 of 202 ry US a U um G co J J M r d O r- r N r COto a 00 Cl LL u7 4 a CJ C? r r + CO 0 Q Q � Cfl F 00 F r 00 i r r i r r r .hd. r r r W)T r � C3 C) O r r p i r p 00 CO oCDC 000LO r O00LOLO(oo r © cn O00a a aCLOM �t (� (4 M oD iti oo N oo p0 00 00 00 oD MMMMM M ©tom I� N N iiJ N tri M M N N M M � M N N C? O O© O O O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r r© 0 0 0 U N M M CD O N m (O O CO M m m M M (D (0 M (3) O (D Z 0 LO M LO M N N e- w M M — T N N e- r- CO M N Q' r IL N .- + ^ N M (L 00 0 to N M N d Q U) w 00 00 CO M to M C(i cY eY M M �Y �} (Q N N N N N d' N (M M 4 J CN M N N Y- M M Z (3G a E c E E W U) -ri a N m c Ca d) r- 0 Uf 0 (Cf 0 ro� 0 `� m (0 m = V C1 a U^ Qi T m a6. CL O IL � C ��� "a rm E CD aS U) 0 c M M (.%' f�4 (0 uJ •� 4) C NN" m U O] IB E O '17 " ,0 CL ,` N 0) E im °' N c E o E E ' 0 v c o _ a c c m �' v 0 tQ E c v N ro L1 v '� E ro �" a m o v y x� '�' ro p' o v c b (a (a E o N a c r= o f ro y p c ro 3 E .N N �r E a? c o cn v v .� U E E v a�i <u u, c ro E a v, a ro ci `a a�i v '� a�i E '�, '�, y '� 'S E E - c E ° a �' c o a uv, U' w +� T a v L o ICE x o v v as E ae O d LL (U Q -a {[¢¢vc�a.a r�¢ �aa.0 wa fa�IL¢acn av¢ Packet Page 107 of 202 0 c� a o O w T- t m •- r U W r i r i r r r r r(0f�o r r r r r Lo r r r r to 1 O r 0 LLJ D_ m LO z tL ua CDu 0 TN 4 Ca w O O tb tb C3 0 0 0 0 0 tD r r 0 CD O r r tb 0 p r N d tit tX7 rr (D N (D tD (D (N 00 00 t3 r N M 0 qt Lo to U i-gr N N� CA Lr) to N b W -= m OLL a0oaaMCD00o00cno00 ©oocnp r m M N N M W (W Co "t 0 0 0o a) r- N a) 00 (D (D Co (D to �-- Y r- Lr� L M 1- 1- p- M i• N M — u7 to e M� r- N� N m � LL CL O r 0 tb O O Q O O p O O O© O 6 O tb ' 0 0 0© r O O (J M M M M M M M M (Q p d) N M M N N d• fM M M N N mb to t0 0 e- r e- lf) LO N N N N N N N 't N Co w co co 0o (N 00 00 eY Q r^ of a O N N N CA (D d' CO M M 'It N 00 M d- N (D tD N Co Co Co Co ..J CO — — — d st Z Llr a. C O U •a Q Q m 0. CL LL1 L Q U -b 'S w a's. mi p 0 .E A/ 0 Q C 0) N C to W >a7 C ram+ U tF -a a) -= C � O © a "� Cu N m 3 c a E© (a r'�n a) w�ro o O �c U te«ar 'O Q pp µM O b ti ri ©rUn * © Z a 4E VM �cQ Uc o � cCL �a 'a�yCu w n cC/) LUJco0a. 3a'a rvc�o moncd, << w ClwUiFE 1-- Packet Page 108 of 202 J < r" ~ O C) CD Y � N (DO M O 0 }¢ N L M U m D a CO iLJ LO Z N C3LL to 0 LU o iCF N , iC,r i i OD r r r i i , i q i 00 C) Q N N M N 5 O f� � of d W 2 O N © O LL a CO pd r LO 0 0 A Q C] CD 0 C) r 00 0 0 'Kt OD CA Co 00 N (D ii 1f i �M(D O L(-) r 0') 0)CA COCA O) U � to M M N N (D �-^ r- M r r CO Ln t` M r W O r'' 04 CD r CD CD CD N Cl) r OCe) CD M� N0 CD CD I-*N r CJ M Z 0_ r^ Q Aw (0 ❑ LY d ri M MC3NNd NNmt(00000 N M c - t— M r- e-- r- r s!' OD '[Y �... Z w IL c 0 � U 0 O U 15 Y Va U o U C _C E U .. U C t0 c E Uj LL "O C7 N CL y toIm C C Ow +N" .O w" C O 16US C V7 G o r' V o) i� p U c c -a " t/1 U tm c�a cpi 11 ai C C t -0 -0 i_ 0 o v c -r� `O O 3�,56 U Q m a) §-0 'a Q r• 'O 0) -0 i0. � z C N aC 1C �. a) d tm C C U U) y� Ll :L� ((i O 0) U •� C 0 w- °� to O O Q sc ¢� N i7 to (Q l6 'C U �' m tU :p O p U © v J Q b) s`L E ,4; cn w a (a 10 0 'r- 10 b CL lu C: b o /) © ? 'zy rs a c m E c m m w E C r�V.( r 4) 7 fU C r V (D d) 0� N 0 E •N .N .tU _N m� Q) U> E O CD 1V i] .X "CO C rn 3 Q ¢d N¢¢ca .SG N O O i "Q mo-�rxc�crUt>rCL a.¢ X O v O L3_ O '� _! m F vcnQ Packet Page 109 of 202 Z F W LLI U- 0 Ca Ca la 0 d 0 CO M © Er Q O N (0 (.Q � J 00 0 [V .- CD 0 0 O Cn M sp N _ [C1 � N Cfl LO FO tz N U) n 0:)L 64 u w X Gq rn 64 U o Z C,� LL D- (1) pC O x U Z to N w CD U •Z N v-,C Q r- C C 40 co M p 4) to 0 mCL f0 o .�. O -0 0 CO LU y U1 t- i- e- - N a` .!G o o x `o -'idm o uj N Ca CU0 o T v N d U N U N tm CO ¢(0o2 ° �� C �cU: UJ �CO2 0 0 a� ca d Packet Page 110 of 202 PACES An Engmcernny Wines Company March 7, 2007 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects 231 Summit Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Subject: Old Woodway Elementary School Park Site REVI SEC? - Proposal for Professional Surveying and Civil Engineering Services Dear Mr. MacLeod: PACE Engineers, 1 nc. would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit this budget proposal for providing Professional Surveying and Civil Engineering Services for the subject project. This proposal reflects received revisions requested to the February 8, 2007 scope and fee proposal previously submitted. The overall scope of this proposal is to provide topographic surveying and site civil engineering services for the project from pre -design studies through the bidding and award phase. The project will primarily consist of redeveloping 5.6067 acres of the 11.2134 acre Old Edmonds Woodway Elementary School property into a new City of Edmonds Public Park. The future park is located north of 2371h Place SW and west of 104th Avenue West in Edmonds. The existing property has several school room buildings and associated asphalt parking, play areas and sidewalks. Approximately 1.5 acres of and existing wooded buffer area running along the northern edge of the 5.6067 acre property will not be altered by the proposed redevelopment. The proposed park improvements will consist of new play areas, play fields, walks, open areas, and park amenities to support their use as the program demands. It is assumed that required storm water treatment and flow control facilities will be designed by others and that no design related to storm water treatment or flow control will be provided by PACE It is anticipated that the project will be designed and permitted in 2007 and constructed no later than 2008. The estimates presented in this proposal are based on the information available at the present time. Any significant change in the scope of work would have to be reviewed and estimates revised. The tasks, scope of work and estimated fees as we envision them are as follows: SURVEY Area of coverage: The Edmonds School District property located at 23708 -- 104tn Ave W, Edmonds, depicted as proposed Parcel B on the 2/28/06 survey as prepared by Axis Survey and Mapping. The area to be mapped is the portion of the site containing an existing school complex and the wooded area north and west of the complex. The east limit will be the east pavement edge of 104 h Ave W, the south limit will be the south pavement edge of 237t" R. SW, the north limit will be the north property line Packet Page 111 of 202 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects March 7, 2007 Page 2 and the west limit will be the west line of proposed Parcel B on the 2/28/06 survey as prepared by Axis Survey and Mapping. Mapping will follow demolition of the building complex. Scope of Services: Mapping and Boundary Survey PACE will recover monuments required to determine the boundary of the property. Planimetric features such as curbs, buildings, parking striping and fences will be surveyed and shown on the mapping. Spot elevations and changes in slope will be located over the area and 1-foot contours showing the elevation changes will be generated. Within the wooded area, trees greater than 12 inch dbh will be located. The mapping will be drafted in AutoCAD 2004 format and delivered on a CD and signed hard copy. Assumptions: Property corners will be marked with a wood stake but a record of survey will not be filed. No utility locate is required. Information required from Client: Right of Entry to the site. Surveying Fee: Mapping and Survey will be done on a time and material basis not to exceed $15,000.00. ENGI NEERI NG TASK 1- CONCEPTUAL ENGI NEERI NG (5-30% ) Project Scope and Program Refinement to include early scoping meetings to review existing conditions (prior to the demolition of existing building and paving), anticipated improvements, procedures, submittal requirements, schedule, anticipated environmental impacts, and permit avoidance strategies. Scope of Work for Task 1 1. Attend meetings as required. Fbr budget purposes 8 hours total meeting time has been allotted for this project. Time spent in meetings above the allotted amount will be billed on a time and material basis as authorized. 2. Review available existing data for adequacy as it relates to the proposal (existing utility drawings, soils reports, etc.), and determine the need for additional information. 3. Research location and size of wet utilities available for servicing the site. To include water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage. It is assumed that dry utilities such as natural gas, power and communications will not be a part of work coordinated by PACE Packet Page 112 of 202 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects March 7, 2007 Page 3 4. Provide review of the preliminary grading plan designed by MacLeod Reckord of the proposed site improvements. 5. Provide preliminary design of the storm drainage conveyance system for the proposed site improvements. 6. Coordinate storm system conveyance system with an Owner provided neighborhood infiltration plan designed to address treatment and flow control requirements far the site. 7. Provide preliminary design of off site street improvements for 237=h Place SW and 100 Avenue W where Right -of -Way fronts the project property. 8. Provide preliminary design and layout for a water service to a public drinking fountain. 9. Provide Master Plan level design and cost estimation for water and sanitary sewer service to a future restroom building. TASK 2 — DESI GN DEVELOPMENT (60% ) Scope of Work for Task 2 1. Project coordination for all of the Civil Engineering work on the project with the MacLeod Reckord/other sub-consultants/City. 2. Provide a temporary erosion -sedimentation control (TESC) plan including details and notes in accordance with City of Edmonds standards and requirements. 3. Provide specifications for the erosion -sedimentation control facilities using APd NWSDOT format. 4. Coordinate with MacLeod Reckord to locate staging and stockpile areas on plans. 5. Review grading plans prepared by MacLeod Reckord and provide red -line mark-up comments. 6. Provide applicable grading details and notes to MacLeod Reckord. 7. Provide pavement cross-section design and details. 8. Provide final plans for the construction of the on -site storm drainage conveyance system in accordance with City of Edmonds standards and requirements. Provide storm drainage details and notes. It is assumed that the storm drainage system will be a gravity system. It is assumed PACE will coordinate the storm drainage conveyance system with an owner provided neighborhood infiltration plan designed to address treatment and flow control requirements for the site. The City provided plans and specifications will be incorporated into the construction document set. No flow control or water treatment/quality analysis is anticipated to be done by PACE 9. Provide construction specifications for the storm drainage conveyance system using APWA/WSDOT format. 10. Provide final plans for the construction of the off site street improvements for 237`h Place SW and 1041h Avenue W where Right -of -Way fronts the project property. 11. Provide construction specifications for the off site street improvements for 2371h Place SW and 104`h Avenue W where Right -of -Way fronts the project property using APVVNWSDOT format. 12. Provide final plans for the construction of the on -site domestic water service (public drinking fountain) in accordance with City of Edmonds standards and requirements. If required the connection for irrigation water will be shown to the irrigation meter. Design of irrigation beyond meter will be by Landscape Architect. Packet Page 113 of 202 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects March 7, 2007 Page 4 13. Provide construction specifications for the on site domestic water system using APWA/WSDOT format. 14. Assist with the information for submittal to the Oty for review, approval and permit. Submittals are anticipated to be performed by Landscape Architect. 15. Provide preliminary estimate of probable construction costs for site civil work. 15. Prepare for and participate in review with MacLeod Reckord and City of Edmonds. 17. Review and provide comments on SEPA checklist as prepared by others. 18. Submit plans, cost estimate and outline spec for review. Prepare for and participate in review with MacLeod Reckord and Oty of Edmonds. Incorporate review comments in Task 3. Attendance at coordination and strategy meetings with Landscape Architect, subconsultants and/or the Oty of Edmonds. We have budgeted a total of (4) meetings at 4 hours each. It is assumed that the Principal Engineer will attend (2) meetings charged at $155.00 per hour and that the Project Engineer will attend (2) meetings at $115.00 per hour. Meeting time in excess of this budget will be billed on a time and material basis at the given rates when authorized by the owner in a signed contract amendment. 19. Perform field trips to site to verify conditions/ issues in question. We have budgeted (4) trips at 4 hours each at $115.00 per hour. Field time in excess of this budget will be billed on a time and material basis at the given rates when authorized by the owner in a signed contract amendment. 20. Prepare NPDES documents and permits including legal notices for proposed work. By direction provided in the construction specifications the contractor will be responsible for preparation of his own Surface Water Pollution Prevention flan (SINPPP) and turbidity monitoring plan to have on site during construction. No time has been budgeted in this proposal for PACE preparation of those two DOE required items as they are not necessary for permit approval but only for construction activity. compliance. TASK 3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (90% and f 00% ) Scope of Work for Task 3 Prepare final documents for bidding, including final details and calculations. Incorporate or resolve changes requested by City in review comments and permit conditions. Finalize reports. Prepare technical specifications. Prepare a final estimate of probable construction costs for site civil work, including for additive alternates. Submit documents and cost estimate for final review and permit submittal. Incorporate final comments. Prepare reproducible final bid documents and deliver for reproduction and distribution to bidders. TASK 4 - BI DDI NG AND AWARD Feld and respond to inquiries from prospective bidders regarding contract documents. Prepare addenda required to clarify or modify the requirements of the contract documents. TASK 5 — CONSTRUCTI ON ADMI NI STRATI ON Scope of Work for Task 5 1. Provide support during bidding and contractor selection process. Packet Page 114 of 202 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects March 7, 2007 Page 5 2. Attend four (4) project meetings. 3. Engineer and coordinate field changes and change orders. 4. Address in -field concerns 5. Review material submittals. 6. Provide site observation visits during construction. (Does not include full-time inspection services) 7. Provide final walk-through and punch list. 8. Provide final "as -built" record drawings in both hard and electronic copy. 9. Assist the Project Manager/Owner as required. TASK 6 - DI RECT RE] MBURSABLES 1. For budget estimating purposes the cost of Direct Reimbursables have been estimated at roughly 2.5 percent of the expected cost of Tasks 1-5. 2. Direct Reimbursables shall cover the cost of expenses such as prints, plots, copies, deliveries, NPDES public notice and travel mileage. 3. Task 6 does not include necessary permit, review, submittal, and related fees assumed to be paid by the owner. 4. Fees for Task 6 are included in the total budget. ENGI NEERI NG FEE We propose to provide our services on a time and material basis as described above based upon the task breakdown that follows. Direct reimbursable expenses such as prints, plots, courier services, mileage, etc. is included in the contract amount. It is assumed that MacLeod Reckord will coordinate all major printing and submittal exercises. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SI TE C1 VI L ENGI NEERI NG COSTS Tasks 1-5 - Pre -design Studies through Bidding and Award $ 27,900,00 Task 6 — Direct Reimbursable Costs $ 700._00 TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED BUDGET (Tasks 1-6) $ 28,600.00 Any billing for additional services outside the scope of this proposal will be by signed contract amendment based on the attached rates. The above scope of services and related fee has been based on the following assumptions: 1. Design fees for utilities are for on -site facilities only with a connection to the existing system, and do not include any design for extension of offsite utilities. 2. A site survey is included in this proposal. If survey is to be provided by others survey of existing conditions (after site demolition) shall be provided in AutoCAD 2005 format using City of Edmonds approved horizontal and vertical datum. 3. Site civil design will be carried to proposed site property lines and/or the centerline of Packet Page 115 of 202 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects March 7, 2007 Page 6 adjacent streets. 4. All final design plans will be in AutoCAD 2005 format. 5. The contractor will provide red -line mark-ups with "as -constructed" revisions noted on the plans for use by PACE to incorporate revisions and produce final record drawings. No field verification of "as -constructed" conditions is included in this proposal. PACE. can provide a cost at a later date for completing "as -built" field verification survey if the Client so desires. 6. Any sensitive area studies including geotechnical reports, wetlands, etc. and traffic analysis if required is assumed to be done by the owner. 7. Owner will pay all necessary permit, review, submittal and related fees. 8. Any storm system calculations or reports required to support the storm drainage treatment or flow control design will be performed by the owner. 9. 1t is assumed that preparation of a construction Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and erosion control inspection services such as turbidity and/or pH monitoring will be provided by the contractor. PACE can provide a cost at a later date for completing construction monitoring services if the Owner so desires. Basic TESL design is included in the above described scope of work. 10. Plan revisions required to accommodate significant changes to site plan after design development plans have been prepared or the requirement to prepare drawings for multiple project phases or bid alternates may require a revision to the proposed fee schedule. Additional services outside the scope of this proposal will be by signed contract amendment. 11. Construction inspection, survey layout and easement descriptions/exhibits have not been included in the proposed budget for this project. PACEcan provide a cost at a later date for completing these services if the Owner so desires. 12. PACE assumes that the Phase 1 project does not have the need for a sanitary sewer services. Preliminary layout of sanitary sewer to a future restroom is included in the above described scope of work. 13. PACE assumes the excess water from the drinking fountain will go into a dry well. 14. No allowance has been made for any structural engineering services. Structural engineering services will be by others or by signed contract amendment. In summary, we have developed a scope of work and budget based on our present knowledge of the proposed project. This budget does not include any off -site studies or analysis not described within the proposed scope of work. We have tried to cover all aspects of the site civil work for this project; however, if you feel that additional areas of work require our attention or if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us. If you concur with this proposal, please sign below and forward one copy back to our office. . Packet Page 116 of 202 Mr. Ed MacLeod MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects March 7, 2007 Page 7 Again, we are pleased to submit this proposal to accomplish the Professional Site Civil Engineering tasks for the project and look forward to continued work with you. if you concur with this proposal and the attached Terms and Conditions, please sign below and forward one copy back to our office. Sincerely, PACE Engineers, Inc. Philip D. Cheesman, RE Vice President Attachment I agree to the above described surveying proposal. Name/Signature Title Date { W W W W W W * k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * #* * * * W W W W W W W W W * * * * * * k * * * * * * * * * W * * * * * * W W W * * W * * * * * * * W * * * I agree to the above described engineering proposal. Name/Signature Title Date Oid woodway ES Park Packet Page 117 of 202 SCOPE OF WORK: ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTING SERVICES PROPOSAL FOR OLD WOODWAY SCHOOL PARK As requested, this proposal is for Gilles Consulting to provide arboricultural consulting services for the Old Woodway School Park. They arboricultural consulting services proposed are in three main areas: 1. Identification and evaluation of significant and specimen shrubs and trees existing on the property to determine if they can be retained. a. This element will 'include a plan for protection or preparation for moving. 2. An analysis of the forest are to identify any trees that have disease or structural defects that are potentially hazardous. a. This element will include a prescriptive management plan including documentation of the conditions present and how to manage risk down to an acceptable level. 3. A specific amount of time to meet with the design team to discuss location to move specimen plants, tree selection for planting, and the development of a tree protection plan. METHODOLOGY: As a former City Arborist with the cities of Kirkland and Mercer Island who was involved in the review of development and redevelopment plans, I am aware of the needs to balance environmental concerns of tree preservation with the need to use a site to its greatest potential. I also have a strong awareness of the information needed by plan review staff as well as the park staff and what information they need to be able to make informed and reasoned decisions. These issues are rarely black and white. To evaluate the trees and to prepare the report, I will draw upon my 28+ years of experience in the field and my formal education in Natural Resources Management, Dendrology, Forest Ecology, Plant Identification, and Plant Physiology. I will also follow the protocol of the International Society of Arboriculture for Tree Assessment while looking at the overall health of the trees and the site conditions. This is a scientifically based process to look at the entire site, the surrounding land and the soil, as well as a complete look at the trees themselves. In examining each tree, I look at such factors as: size, vigor, crown ratio and class, density of needles, injury, insect activity, root damage and root collar health, crown health, evidence of disease causing bacteria, fungi or virus, dead wood and hanging Packet Page 118 of 202 Gilles Consulting Page 2 of 3 limbs. From this information we can determine what the best fixture for the individual tree or shrub is and offer those alternatives to the design team for consideration. This is work that I specialize in and I have developed a team along with processes and procedures that enable us to gather a large volume of quality data in a short time. We can tag, measure, and evaluate each tree in a record amount of time. This data can then be sorted and evaluated to help you accomplish your design goals. SCOPE OF WORK This proposal is based on a time and materials allocation of the work required to evaluate the trees and shrubs at the site, collate the data, and office time to develop recommendations and document everything in a form that works for the design team. This proposal is predicted on the availability of a boundary and topographic survey that includes the location of the trees. It also assumes that you or someone familiar with the site can walk the property lines and identify the property corners to orient us to the site. It is quicker, and therefore cheaper, for me to number and tag the trees if possible. If the surveyor has already numbered and tagged the trees we can work with that as well. We will need a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with the trees listed and all the data collected by the survey team. In addition, we will need 5 copies of the boundary and topo with the tree numbers legible. I estimate the cost of the work to be as follows: Work Activities: 0 Unit rate sub total Site Evaluation of Trees: 7 Hours $190.00 $1,330.00 Data Entry: 1 Hours $120.00 $120.00 Report Preparation 6 Hours $120.00 $720.00 Soil and Root pathology tests 2 Each $124.00 $248.00 Resistograph Drill Tests — rfneeded 2 Each tree $40.00 $80.00 $2,498.00 The final product delivered to you will be three copies of a report that includes the documented condition rating and status of each specimen tree and shrub on the site. Please note that this is the type of work we specialize in and the work we enjoy doing the most. We do exceedingly competent work very quickly. We also keep accurate records of my work. We will be glad to do the work for you on a "Not to Exceed" basis. That is, if we accomplish the work in less time than my estimates we will only charge you for the work done. if some unforeseen circumstance arises that could require additional work not outlined in this proposal we would contact you in advance and discuss the situation, the options, and develop a mutually agreed upon solution. In this case, we would propose to charge our standard hourly rate for the work that exceeds this proposal. Packet Page 119 of 202 Gilles Consulting Page 3 of 3 Once we have your approval to proceed we can make this a priority in my schedule. if you sign and fax this proposal back to me I will put your project at the top of my work schedule. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultu ral needs. Sincerely, Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist — PN-0260 American Society of Consulting Arborists, Registered Consulting Arborist — RCA-4 18 I can begin the work immediately with your signature of approval below. Signature & Title Billing Address: Date Packet Page 120 of 202 February 26, 2007 Edward MacLeod 231 Summit AVenUe E. Soattlo, WA 98102 Subject: Fee Pivposal Old Woordraaal Eloinealary Park Dear Edward, SPAKLING Thank you (ar calling Sparling for this project. As discussed, [ NAMIs j is committed as Principal -In -Charge and [ NAME ] as Project Manager. This letter confirms our understanding of the scope of work and presents our fee proposal for electrical tU: engineering services. This scope of work is based upon the information given to its 3 i,`II in your project description dated February 20, 2007, ��:,Iill,•lL,,v;}liSl:Illii 1, Project Scope. We believe the project to encompass the following Specific tasks: 1. Field investigation at the Old Woodway Elementary School to identify existing utilities to :support a now 5.56 acre neighl)orhood ;I,1.., ,,,;,,,•.<�,; park. 2. Design for pathway lighting, electrical support for new restrooms, and an irrigatioai controller to support the new park layout. 3. Provide construction documents and opinion of probable cost. 4. Construction support. 2. Electrical Design Sc ('Pe. Sparling will provide electrical engineering services to produce design drawings and specifications suitable for one bid package. 3. Professional r°cvq. Sparling will provide its professional services for the Basic Work on a t TIME AND EXPENSE WITH MAXIMUM FEES j basis of $5,612 (Refer to Attachment A for breakdown of costs). 4. Design Agreement. This document constitutes the entire agreement. We understand you will furnish us with AutoCAD compatible plans. 5. Quali(y Review Process. Sparling views quality as an interactive and ongoing process between the design team disciplines. Timely receipt of information and check set drawings of other disciplines to achieve thorough coordination has resulted in successful projects. We need 2 weeks prior to the end of construction documents to do a final overall coordination check with completed documents of all disciplines. For the best interests of line project, ; I_FC7 P. ICA1. CH(q i N rT:P i N 6 1 3GCHN0L0 GY CO)d SU L Y I NG Packet Page 121 of 202 FT)WARn MACLF0D FEE PROPOSAL I'AG1' 2 OF ? FEE3RtfArY 26, 2UU7 S P A L N WC I'CgUest Lhat formal duality review periods be Built into the project schedule, We are very exci Led about this project and look forward to working with you. Please hive me a call if you have any questions concerning Our scope of work or proposal. Sincercl}', Robert B Sparlirtg S\ IM%':d0C'U1114'lltS MILI SVWII�5AIILI S1'00t NVd> tl"„i il•li� �. Y'1: C I1 iJ O L O G Y C O16SU L Y I N G Packet Page 122 of 202 0 0 CL m 0 0 0 IM 2E CIO CD 0 CDria U) M! (D 0 N) U. 1 0 0 CQ1 C C) C-1 C uj Uj C-9 9% C\ 0", to is p p �:,:D ED, I 0 C� g PJ C> CD C> Ij V� IA tA IQ VIl C9 0 Cl) IQ 5 �.N 11) jQ w I I.}IQ 1C RO. CD Packet Page 123 of 202 MLA Engineering, pllc Structural Design February 28, 2007 Mr. Edward Macleod Macleod Reckord 231 Summit Ave East Seattle, Washington 98102 Re: City of Edmonds Backstops MLA Project Number: 2007.9905 Dear Mr, MacLeod: We are pleased to offer structural design of the foundations for the steel pole backstop at the ball field located in Edmonds, Washington. Project Description: A J-style steel pole and mesh backstop is proposed for the ball field. The City of Edmonds requires that structural engineering be provided for the steel poles and the design of the drilled concrete piers that supports them. Scope of Services and Fees: Our services will provide for permit and construction documents as outlined below. We will develop our design calculations, notes and details using AutoCAD plans and details that your office provides, for the foundation design to support a J-style steel pole and mesh backstop. We will reference the structural details from your plans. Our services will be provided and billed in two separate phases: Phase I — Design and Construction Documents • Structural calculations, stamped and signed, of backstop and foundation • Mark-up of Permit/Construction drawings (drawn in CAD by MacLeod-Reckord) of steel pole structure • Drawing of reinforced concrete drilled pier foundation for backstop • Review and edit specifications provided by MacLeod-Reckord; • Respond to reviewing agency comments. Time and expense estimate not -to -exceed: $5,000. Phase II - Services during bid and construction: • Respond to bidder questions • Review concrete mix designs and reinforcing bar shop drawings • Review inspection reports Time and expense estimate not to exceed: $1,200. 1411 Fourth Ave., Suite 760 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: 206.264.2727 Fax: 206.264.4835 Packet Page 124 of 202 Proposal for Structural Design Services City of Edmonds Backstop for Ball Field Page 2 Additional services: Services that are beyond those described in the scope above will be estimated based upon our hourly rates. We will not proceed with additional services unless pre -approved in writing. Terms and Conditions: The terms and conditions, as provided in the attached Exhibit A, are made part of this agreement by acceptance of this proposal. Please initial. We look forward to working on your project. If this proposal is acceptable to you, please return a signed copy to this office. Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, MLA Engineering, plic Michael S. Leonard, P.E. Accepted by: Principal Date: Attachment: Exhibit A — Terms and Conditions Exhibit B — Fee Estimate Calculation 1411 Fourth Ave., Suite 760 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: 206.264.2727 Fax: 206.264.4835 Packet Page 125 of 202 AM-899 2.I. Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/ 27/ 2007 Submitted By: Brian McIntosh, Parks and Recreation Time: Consent Department: Parks and Recreation Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with Hough Beck & Baird Inc. for consulting services to Update the Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Authorize Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Hough Beck & Baird Inc. to update the Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. Previous Council Action On November 28, 2006, Council authorized staff to advertise for Statements of Qualification from consultants to update the Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. Narrative Staff reviewed the SOQ's and selected four consultants or consultant teams to interview. The consulting firm of Hough Beck & Baird was selected. This firm has completed many comprehensive park plans throughout the northwest including the cities of Bothell, Woodinville and Kenmore in recent years. The comprehensive planning process presents an excellent opportunity for citizen involvement through public workshops and hearings. This updated plan will become an element of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and when completed will present appropriate policies, goals, guidelines and programs for achieving maximum service to the public. Staff has negotiated the scope and fee schedule attached to this agenda memo that also includes subconsultants to update the existing Cultural Plan and a professionally administered citizen survey. The negotiated fee is $49,921.63 and will be paid from budgeted planning funds in the Parks Improvement Fund 125 . Link: Exhibit 1 - Contract Link: Exhibit 2 - Scope of Work Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Planning Department Rob Chave 03/22/2007 02:43 PM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 03/22/2007 02:44 PM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:50 PM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 02:59 PM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 03:04 PM APRV Form Started By: Brian McIntosh Started On: 03/21/2007 03:27 PM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 126 of 202 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Hough Beck & Baird, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide Update of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit A, provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of $ 49,921.63. B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the Parks & Recreation Director three days prior to the scheduled cut- off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle. C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. Packet Page 127 of 202 3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant and shall not be considered public records, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become public records. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and, subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant's negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. 6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage 2 Packet Page 128 of 202 A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State. B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the City. The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin or physical handicap. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written notification to the City and the City's prior written consent. 10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten days in advance of the effective date of said termination. 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document and the Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A. These writings constitute the entire 3 Packet Page 129 of 202 Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Services. 14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the contractor shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: 59 Packet Page 130 of 202 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department City of Edmonds 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Hough Beck & Baird 215 Westlake Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109-5217 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. DATED THIS DAY OF , 2007. CITY OF EDMONDS CONSULTANT: By Gary Haakenson, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss By Its 5 Packet Page 131 of 202 COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2007, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 0 Packet Page 132 of 202 MAR 14 2007 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE March 12, 2007 Mr. Brian McIntosh, Director Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services City of Edmonds 700 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan Update Cultural Plan Update Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. McIntosh: Hough Beck & Baird (HBB) is pleased to submit this proposal for planning services. Also, we wish to thank you for your time in reviewing this project with us on February 5, 2007. Since we have been involved with other comprehensive park planning projects, we are confident that our office can provide the personal and professional services required to make the Edmonds Park, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan and Cultural Plan Updates (PROC) a success. Based upon our knowledge of this project and previous discussions with you, we are proposing the following professional services for your consideration. Our proposed scope of work will easily permit modification as we progress through the planning process. The planning phases that we are proposing for your project will generally include the following: TASK 1. ANALYZE THE PLAN 1.1. Finalize project scope, schedule & budget. 1.2. Review background information, including digital copy (in Word format) of existing Edmonds PROC Plan, Yough Plan, Cultural Plan and 2007 Arts Commission Strategic Plan. Background information will be provided by the city. TASK 2. INVENTORY ANALYSIS 2.1. Prepare for and attend a site tour of key PROC facilities with city staff, planning team and/or Advisory Group members. Transportation during the site tour will be arranged by the city. Notice of the site tour to Advisory Group or other stakeholders will be provided by the city. 2.2. Review update of inventory of existing PROC facilities and programs provided by the city. City will include detailed quantities of different types of improvements (ballfields, playgrounds, etc.) at each facility, based on types of improvements quantified in existing plan. Document updated inventory in spreadsheet format and on one plan graphic. Base information for the plan graphic will include an aerial photograph with city PROC facilities, school facilities, city limits, planning boundary, adjacent jurisdiction's PROC facilities, and/or other civic facilities identified. Private park facilities are not included in this documentation. Private cultural facilities will be included. GIS data, files or maps are not included and will be provided by the city if needed. Plan graphics will be formated for both 11 °x17" and large format printing, in color. City will document inventory update on facility sheets included in the existing PROC document (appendix) and provide a revised digital file for that appendix. An updated inventory of existing art works within the city's system will not be included. 2.3. Establish existing level of service (LOS) for parks, recreation and open space, including a cost per capita value of the existing system. Seattle I Boise Packet Page 133 of 202 PROC Update March 12, 2007 Page 2 TASK 3. VISIONING PROCESS 3.1, Prepare for and attend a workshop with the Advisory Group and city to: • Review background information; • Review existing inventory and LOS; and • Determine overall vision for future of PROC facilities and programs in Edmonds. Overall vision will be documented in a brief written statement. 3.2. Update goals and objectives in the PROC document based on workshop with Advisory Group. TASK 4. NEEDS & OPPORTUNITIES 4.1. Prepare for and attend a public workshop to review existing inventory and determine future needs and opportunities for PROC facilities and programs. Public workshop will be broken down into three phases: • Charrette with specific cultural community members; Public open house to review existing inventory; and Public charrette in small groups to generate ideas on PROC elements. Inventory documentation (spreadsheet, plan graphic and PROC document) will be updated to include recommended improvements. 4.2. Establish future LOS and budget requirements associated with proposed improvements and based on information from the public, Advisory Group and city workshops. 4.3. Prepare for and attend a workshop with the Advisory Group and city to review the recommended PROC facility and program improvements, LOS and budget requirements. Revise spreadsheets, plan graphics, LOS and budget requirements based on Advisory Group and/or city comments. 4.4. Summarize results of the workshop process and results in the PROC document. TASK 5. SURVEYS 5.1. Prepare a telephone survey questionnaire of all registered households in the city of Edmonds to determine priorities for proposed PROC improvements and potentW financing climate (i.e., potential bond or levy amount per household, joint venture opportunities, etc,). Telephone survey will be conducted and results tabulated by GMA Research (see attached). 5.2. Prepare a web survey questionnaire for the general public (within and outside the city of Edmonds) to determine current participation rates for PROC facilities. Survey will be developed in Word or Excel format and will be uploaded and managed on the city's website by the city. Results will be tabulated by the City and provided to HBB. 5.3. Conduct telephone survey (by GMA Research — see attached). 5.4. Summarize telephone survey process and results from data tabulated by GMA Research in the PROC document. 5.5. Summarize web survey process and results from data tabulated by the City in the PROC document. Id i Packet Page 134 of 202 PROC Update March 12, 2007 Page 3 TASK 6. DEVELOP THE PLAN 6.1. Prepare a draft PROC Update based on the process and information gathered above. City to provide draft CIP (7 year) for including in the Update. Plan will include an Executive Summary that may be enlarged up to an 11"x17" folding handout for use by the city in marketing, on the city's web site and/or similar supporting activities. Other than the Executive Summary and combining the Cultural Plan with the Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan into one document, it is anticipated that much of the remainder of the existing document (general descriptions, organization, format, etc.) will remain the same and only updated as needed. 6.2. Prepare for and attend a workshop with the Advisory Group and city to review the draft PROC Update and revise the document (text, spreadsheets and graphics) based on Advisory Group and/or city comments. 6.3. Prepare for and attend a public open house to review the draft PROC document. Materials presented at the meeting will include two copies of the draft PROC document, large format plan graphics for each park type, and other information from the plan that can be enlarged for a public open house format. TASK 7. IMPLEMENTATION 7.1. Prepare for and attend a workshop meeting with the Advisory Group to review results of the public open house and draft PROC Update. Revise the draft PROC document based on comments received at the open house or from Advisory Group and/or city comments. 7.2. Prepare for and attend one Park/Planning Board meeting to review draft PROC Update and revise the document based on Board and/or city comments. 7.3. Prepare for and attend one City Council meeting to review the recommended PROC Update and finalize the document based on Council and/or city comments. In consideration of the above services, we are proposing the following estimated fee (see Exhibit A): TASK 1. Analyze the Plan $ 509.00 TASK 2. Inventory Analysis $ 2,306.50 TASK3. Visioning Process $ 1,117.50 TASK 4. Needs & Opportunities $ 5,802.50 TASK 5. Surveys $ 2,187.50 TASK 6. Develop the Plan $ 10,416.00 TASK 7. Implementation $ 2,991.00 TASK 8. Out-of-pocket reproduction, printing and other $ 1,200.00 project related costs (billed at 1.15) Subtotal HBB Services: $ 26,530.00 TASK 9. Subconsultants 4Culture $ 9,927.50 GMA Research $ 8,500.00 Subconsultant Administration (billed at 1.15) $ 2,764.13 _ Subtotal Subconsultant Services: $ 21,191.63 TASK 10. Planning Contingency (additional meetings, graphics) $ 2,200.00 Total Services: $ 49,921.63 Packet Page 135 of 202 PROC Update March 12, 2007 Page 4 our proposed hourly rates for additional work and the work described above are as follows: 1. Principal $ 134.00 2. Landscape Architect/Project Manager $ 117.00 3. Design Staff $ 102.00 4. Computer & Technical Staff $ 88.00 5. Business Management $ 79.00 6. Administrative & Clerical Staff $ 58.00 The above fee is an estimate of how we expect to allocate our time. We reserve the right to move time between tasks as needed to accomplish the overall goals of the project. It is assumed that the city will manage and update a project web site as needed with digital files of relevant information from the tasks above provided by the planning team. It is also assumed that the city will provide all notification, mailing, location and room set-up, as well as copies of handouts and other documents, for Advisory Group and public meetings. City will also provide SEPA documentation and conduct a public hearing as needed. We are very excited about working with you on this project, and we are prepared to negotiate any adjustments in planning services and/or fees to meet the requirements of the project. If you have any questions regarding the above proposal, please call. In closing, we would like to thank you again for your time. HBB is prepared to meet your planning challenges. Best regards, HOUGH BE K & BAIRD INC. Juliet Vong, ASLA Vice President Attachments: Exhibit , HBB Scope & Fee Proposal Exhibit B, 4Culture Scope & Fee Proposal Exhibit C. GMA Scope & Fee Proposal Packet Page 136 of 202 EXHIBIT A EDMONDS PROC UPDATE 3/12/2007 Pagel of 2 }cough Beck Baird Inc. Scope tree Proposal HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC. PRINCIPAL LArPRJ. M'G I DESIGN. I TECH. I BUS, MGMT. CLERICAL SCOPE OF WORK 134.00hir 117.00Ihr 102.00fnr $B.00Ihr 79.001hr 58.00lhr TOTAL 1, ANALYZE THE PLAN 1.1 lFinalize Project Scope, Schedule & Bud et 1.2 1 Review Background Information 2.0 SUBTOTAL HR5 0.0 3.0 0.0 SUBTOTAL $ $ 351.00 $ $ $ 158,00 Is - $ 509.00 2. INVENTORY & ANALYSIS 2.1 Pre are &Attend Site Tour 4.0 2.2 Review& Document Updated lnvento a. S readsheei 1.0 4.0 h. I Plan Graphics 0.5 1.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 2.3 Establish Exis n LOS 0.5 2.0 SUBTOTAL HRS 0.5 5.5 3,0 14.0 0.0 1.0 24.0 SUBTOTAL $67.00 $1543.50 $306.00 $1,232.00 $0.00 $58.00 $2,346.50 3. VISIONING PROCESS 3.1 Prepare & Attend Advisory Workshop a.lMeeting 4.0 3.2 1 Update Goals & Ouectives O.S 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 SUBTOTAL HRs 0.0 4.5 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 11.5 SUBTOTAL $1 $ - $ 52650 $ 102.00 $ 352.00 $ 79,00 $ 58.00 $ 1,117.50 4. NEEDS & OPPORTUNITIES 4.1 Pre are & Attend Public Work -shop a. Meetin 6.0 6.0 b. Revisions O.5 1.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 4.2 Establish Future LOS & Bud e1 0.5 1.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 4.3 Prepare &Attend Adviso Workshop a. Meetin 4.0 1�41ASummarize b. Revisions 0.5 1.0 6,0 1.0 Results in PROC Document 0.5 1.0 2.0 8.0 1.0 SUBTOTAL HRS 1.S 13.5 13.0 28.0 0.0 1 4.0 1 60.0 SUBTOTAL $ 201.00 $ 1,579.50 $ 1326.00 1 $ 2,464.00 1 - 1,3 232.00 $ 5,802.50 S. SURVEYS 5.1 Prepare Tete hone Survey Questionnaire 0.5 1.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 5.2 Prepare Web Survey Questionnaire 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 5.3 Conduct Telephone Survey 1.0 5A Summarize Telephone SuM Results 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 5.S Summarize Web Survey Results 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.5 SUBTOTAL HRS 0.5 3.5 5.0 12.0 0.0 2.5 23.5 SUBTOTAL $ 67,00 1 $ 409.50 1 $ 510.00 1 $ 1066.00 1 $ $ 145.00 $ 2,187,5O OPR C0MP Pl AN UPDA MV . W,.1W86 Fau Propopl Packet Page 137 of 202 EXHIBIT A EDMONDS PROC UPDATE 3/122007 Page 2 of 2 Hough Beck Baird Inc. Scope Fee Proposal HdUGH BECK & BAIRD INC. PRINCIPAL LfVPRJ. M'G DE$$GN. I Tf~CH, I BUS, MGMT, CLERICAL SCOPE OF WORK 134.001hr I 117.001hr 102.0Q/hr 88.OQlhr 79.DDIijr 58.00lhr TOTAL 6. DEVELOP THE PLAN 6.1 Prepare Draft PROC Update 2.0 8.0 12.0 42.0 2.0 _ 8.0 6.2 Prepare & Aflend Adviso Workshop a. Mee€ing 4.0 b. Revisions 1.0 2.0 4.0 10.0 4.0 6.3 Pre are & Attend Public Open House a. Meet€n 6.0 6.0 SUBTOTAL HRS 3.D 20.0 22.0 52.0 2.0 12.0 111.0 SUBTOTAL (J $ 402.00 $ 2,340,00 $ 2,244,00 $ 4,576,00 $ 158,00 1 $ 696.00 $ 10,416.00 7. IMPLEMENTATION 7A Prepare & Attend Adviso Review Medin a. Meetin 4.0 b. Revisions 0.6 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 7.2 Prepare & Attend ParklPlanning Board Meeting a. Mee (ing 4.0 b. Revisions 0.6 1.0 2.0 1.0 7.3 Prepare & Attend City Council Meeting ad Meeting 4.0 h. Revisions 0.5 1.0 2.0 SUBTOTAL HRS 0.5 14.0 4.0 8.0 0.0 3A 29.5 SUBTOTAL $ 67.00 $ 1,638.00 $ 408.00 $ 704.00 $ $ 174.00 $ 2,991.00 SUMMARY BASIC SCOPE OF WORK 1. ANALYZE THE PLAN $ 509.00 2. INVENTORY & ANALYSIS $ 2,306.60 3. VISIONING PROCESS $ 1,117.50 4. NEEDS & OPPORTUNITIES $ 5,80250 5. SURVEYS $ 2,187.50 6. DEVELOP THE PLAN $ 10,416.00 7.IMPLEMENTATION $ 2,991.00 8. OUT-OF-POCKET HBB EXPENSES billed at 1.1 $ 1,200.00 Subtotal HB&S Planning Fees $ 26,630.00 9.SUBCONSULTANTS 4Culture - $ 9,927.50 GMA Research $ 8,50D.00 Subconsutlant Administration Niled at 1.15 $ 2,764.13 Subtotal Subcgnsultant Planning Fees $ 21 191.83 10. PLANNING CONTINGENCY additional meetings, granhios, etc. $ 2,200.00 TOTAL PLANNING FEES $ 49 921,63 0 %N,pas i LIOMONDS !'ri COMP PiAN UPOA IMoNrntii'Mb Ise Propowl Packet Page 138 of 202 EXHIBIT B Culture Scope & Fee Proposal BACKGROUND AND ASSUMPTIONS 4Culture will update the existing Cultural flan, a city -ride document. The City desires a separate Cultural Plan document at the end of the process that includes some visualstgraphics as budget allows, City staff will work with 4Culture to look for connectivity between the outcomes and products of the PROC process and documentation and the cultural planning worts provided by 4Culture, The City's expectations for the Cultural Plan process and product are as follows: 1. A document that is easy to read, engaging, and can be circulated to a broader spectrum of the general public to explain Edmond's Cultural Plan goals, as well as inform the public about why a Cultural Plan has value to a community. 2. The process of updating the Cultural Plan will include a broader public participation element, particularly engaging the arts community. Participation will reflect Edmond's changing cultural community. 4Culture will attend meetings but is not responsible for identifying attendees or Advisory Committee members. Meeting notification and confirmation will be done by others. Scheduling meeting spaces will also be done by others. Final planning documents {a separate update to existing Cultural Plan plus related cultural recommendations that can be included in PROC) will not be printed by 4Culture. Electronic files, including graphic files will be provided to the City for multiple copy printing or web posting. Allowance for presentations assumes 4Culture may have to print some presentation boards. TASK 1. ANALYZE THE PLAN 1.1. Finalize project scope, schedule & budget. Hours: 1.5 hours for principal @ 115.00 1.2. Review background information, including digital copy of existing Edmonds PROC Plan, Cultural Plan, 2007 Arts Commission Strategic Plan. Background information will be provided by City. Hours: 2 hours for principal @ 115.00 2 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 TASK 2. CULTURAL FACILITY AND PROGRAMS INVENTORY ANALYSIS 2.1 Conduct review discussions with city staff of existing Cultural Plan recommendations and accomplishments. City staff to update accomplishments and provide information to 4Culture. Hours: 4 hours for principal c@ 115.00 4 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 2 hours for Public Art Project Manager @ 100.00 2.2 Prepare for and attend a site tour of Cultural Facilities and public art city-wide with city staff, design team and/or Advisory Group members. Transportation during the site tour will be arranged by the city. Notice of the site tour to Advisory Group or other stakeholders will be provided by the city. Hours: 4 hours for principal @ 115.00 4 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 Packet Page 139 of 202 EXHIBIT B 2.3 Prepare a visioning workshop outline and prioritization strategies for discussion with city staff, in preparation for public outreach workshops described in Tasks 3.1 and 4.1 below. Hours: 3 hours for principal @ 115.00 3 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 TASK 3. VISIONING PROCESS 3.1. Prepare for and attend a workshop with a specialized Advisory Group specifically formed to represent the Cultural Community to; • Review background information including changing composition of cultural community; • Review existing Cultural Plan recommendations; and • Detennine overall vision for future of cultural facilities and cultural programs in Edmonds. Overall vision will be documented in a conceptual graphic (plan or diagram) and a brief written statement. Hours: 3 hours for principal @115.00 3 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 3 hours of graphic design services @ 80 3.2. Prepare for and attend a meeting with city staff to review draft recommendations of priorities based on visioning workshop outcomes. City staff to link Cultural Plan draft recommendations to the PROC documents and process. Hours: 3 hours for principal @115.00 3 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 3.3. Prepare for and attend a review meeting with the Advisory Group to review results of the visioning workshop described in Task 3.1 and information to be presented at the public workshop described in Task 4.1 below. Revise overall vision, and goals and objectives one time based on Advisory Group andlor city comments. Hours: 2 hours for principal @115.00 2 hours for Admin staff @ 80.00 TASK 4. NEEDS & OPPORTUNITIES 4.1. Prepare for and attend a public workshop to review existing inventory and determine future needs and opportunities for PROC facilities and programs. Public workshop will be broken down into three phases: • CharreHe with specific cultural community members; • Public open house to review existing inventory; and • Public charretfe in small groups to generate ideas on PROC elements. Hours: 4 hours for principal @115.00 4 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 4 hours for PA Project Manager @ 100.00 4.2. Attend a workshop meeting with the design team and City staff to review workshop results and develop recommended Cultural Plan facility and program improvements. Hours: 2 hours for principal @115.00 2 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 4.3. Summarize results of the workshop process and results. Update graphics as needed. Hours: 2 hours for principal @115.00 Packet Page 140 of 202 EXHIBIT B 1 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 1 hours of graphic design services @ 80 Task 5. SURVEYS No 4Culture work. TASK 6. DEVELOP THE PLAN 6.1. Prepare a draft of the Cultural Plan update. Work with the city to review connectivity between Cultural Plan recommendations and related updates to sections for culture as part of the PROC. Updated Cultural Plan recommendations will be based on the process and information gathered above. Plan will include an Executive Summary that may be enlarged up to an 11 "x17" folding handout for use by the city in marketing, on the city's web site and/or similar supporting activities. Hours: 4 hours for principal @115.00 2 hours for Cultural Program Project Manager @ 100.00 2 hours for PA Project Manager @ 100.00 6.2. Prepare for and attend a workshop with city staff to review the draft Cultural Plan update and revise the document one time based on city comments (text, spreadsheets and graphics). Hours: 2 hours for principal @115.00 6.3. Prepare for and attend a public open house to review the draft Cultural Plan update. Materials presented at the meeting will rely predominantly on PowerPoint graphics. Hours: 2 hours for principal @115.00 TASK 7. IMPLEMENTATION 7.1. Prepare for and attend one meetings with the Advisory Group to review results of the public open house and draft Cultural Plan Update. Revise the draft Cultural Plan document up to two times based on comments received at the open house or from Advisory Group and/or city comments. Hours: 3 hours for principal @115.00 7.2. Prepare for and attend one Park/Planning Board meeting to review draft Cultural Plan Update and revise the document based on Board and/or city comments. Hours: 3 hours for principal @115.00 7.3. Prepare for and attend one City Council meeting to review the recommended Cultural Plan Update and finalize the document based on Council and/or city comments. Hours: 2 hours for principal @116,00 Packet Page 141 of 202 EXHIBIT B In consideration of the above services, we are proposing the following estimated fee (see Exhibit A): TASK 1. Analyze the Plan $ 602.50 TASK 2. Inventory Analysis $ 2,565.00 TASK 3. Visioning Process $ 1,920.00 TASK 4. Needs & Opportunities $ 2,100,00 TASK 5. Surveys $ 0.00 TASK 6. Develop the Plan $ 1,720.00 TASK 7. Implementation $ 1,265,00 TASK 8, Out-of-pocket reproduction, printing and other $ 500.00 Project -related costs Total Services $ 9,927.50 Our proposed hourly rates for additional work and the work described above are as follows: 1. Principal $ 115.00 2. Cultural Programs Project Manager $ 100.00 3. PA Project Manager $ 100.00 4. Administrative Staff/Graphic Design $ 80.00 Packet Page 142 of 202 EXHIBIT C CITY OF EDMONDS RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND RECREATION COMP PLAN UPDATE PROPOSAL PREPARED FOR: Haugh Beek and Baird 215 Westlake Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98109 PREPARED BY: GMA Research Corporation Mountain Pacific Building 1.1808 Northup Way - Suite 270 Bellevue, Washington 98005-1922 (425)827-1251 FAX (425) 828-6778 Email: gmaresearch@msn.com Packet Page 143 of 202 EXHIBIT C CTTV OF EDMONDS RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND RECREATION COMP PLAN UPDATE PROPOSAL Obiectives The overall objective of this study is to provide a statistically valid measure of opinions of residents living within the city limits of Edmonds, and to gain a better understanding of their perceptions and expectations regarding park; recreation and open space facilities and financing strategies. Results from the residents' opinion survey will be used to help the City in future services and facilities planning, budget considerations and decision making. Interview Technique Two (2) telephone interviews will be conducted from GMA Research, located in Bellevue Washington. An initial "qualifying" interview will be completed with a random sample of households within the city informing them of the purpose of the study and obtaining their agreement to participate in the second telephone interview, Following the receipt of a packet mailed to qualifying respondents, a second telephone interview will be completed where respondents will be asked to rate general program and facility priorities, specific development plan proposals, and various financing options. Respondent Ouaiifications All respondents will be registered voters in the City of Edmonds and reside in the Edmonds city limits. Sample Size The initial "qualifying" sample will consist of n--400 completed interviews. N=200 second interviews will then be completed with qualified respondents where respondents are asked to rate general program and facility priorities, specific development plan proposals, and various financing options. Sample Source and Method The sample will be randomly drawn from a random listing of households in Edmonds. The list will be purchased by GMA Research and will include both listed and unlisted telephone households. Packet Page 144 of 202 EXHIBIT C Interview Length The initial "qualifying telephone interview " is estimated to average 1-2 minutes in length and the follow-up "Plan Update" average interview length is estimated to be 15 minutes. Precision Level At the over all final sample size of n=200, we will have a sampling error of±7.1 percentage points. This means that in 95 out of 100 replications of the study, the results would not vary by more than ±7.1 percentage points. Mailin City of Edmonds will be responsible for mailing 400 packets containing the draft flan Update and copy of the telephone survey. GMA Research will provide the City with 400 mailing labels reflecting the name and address of qualifying respondents. Questionnaires Hough Beek and Baird will be responsible for providing GMA Research with a final "qualifying telephone survey" and a final follow-up "Plan Update" telephone survey. Out u#JRe ortrn GMA Research will provide the following: Mailing labels reflecting the name and address of 400 "qualifying" residents. One original and three bound copies of crass -tabulated data tables with up to 24 cross - tabulations. All data tables will display statistical tests (Chi-square and T-tests) Raw data in excel format. Packet Page 145 of 202 EXHIBIT C Estimated Time Schedule Approvalto proceed.............................................................................................. Week 0 Receive "qualifying" and "Plan Update" questionnaires......................................Week I Complete "qualifying" telephone interviews ........................................................Week 1 Produce mailing labels..........................................................................................Week 2 Plan Update and survey mailed.............................................................................Week 2 Complete follow-up "Plan Update" telephone interviews. ..... ....................... Week 4 Raw data and cross -tabulated data base available ................................................Week 5 Proiect Fee Based on the specifications outlined above, the project fee is $8,500, including expenses. This fee covers: • Questionnaire programming • "Qualifying" telephone interviews • Mailing labels • "Plan Update" telephone interviews • Raw data and cross -tabulated data base Packet Page 146 of 202 AM-905 2.1. City Building Energy Project Phase I Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Kim Karas, Public Works Submitted For: Noel Miller Time: Consent Department: Public Works Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Report on final project and construction for the City Building Energy Improvements - Phase I and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council accept the City Building Energy Improvements - Phase I Project. Previous Council Action On March 22, 2005, the City Council authorized the Mayor to sign an interagency agreement with the State of Washington Department of General Administration to provide project management services for City Building energy improvements. On February 28, 2006 an ordinance to finance the energy improvements was approved. Narrative Under the State of Washington Energy Conservation Improvement Program, the City utilized the project management, engineering and contracting services of the Department of General Administration and Quantum Engineering to design and construct HVAC and other energy improvements to City Hall, the Public Safety Complex and the Library buildings. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2006 Revenue: $811,270.00 Expenditure: $741,751.00 Fiscal Impact: No file(s) attached. Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 01:37 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 01:40 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:15 PM APRV Form Started By: Kim Karas Started On: 03/22/2007 10:20 AM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 147 of 202 AM-900 2. K. Temporary Employee Parking Permits Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Duane Bowman, Development Services Time: Consent Department: Development Services Type: Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Proposed Ordinance adopting a new Subsection D into Edmonds City Code 8.51.020 defining temporary employee parking permit; adding a new Section 8.51.042 to Chapter 8.51 ECC entitled Temporary Employee Parking Permit - Validation Required. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Adopt the proposed ordinance amending Edmonds City Code (ECC) Chapter 8.51 establishing temporary parking permits. Previous Council Action Narrative Judge Fair approached the Downtown Parking Committee on March 6, 2007 with a request to establish juror parking permits. After discussing the matter, the Committee concluded that it did not make sense to create a whole new type of parking permit. The Committee decided that the employee parking permit section of the ECC should be amended to allow temporary employee parking parking permits to be issued for jurors. The proposed ordinance implements the recommendation of the Downtown Parking Committee. The temporary employee parking permit would be administered and issued by the Court and would provide jurors the opportunity to park in designated employee parking permit areas without fear of being ticketed. Link: Exhibit 1 - Memo from Judge Fair Link: Exhibit 2 - Proposed Ordinance Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 07:52 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 08:27 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 08:28 AM APRV Form Started By: Duane Bowman Started On: 03/21/2007 03:28 PM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 148 of 202 Juror parking ordinance memorandum Date: March 1, 2007 To: Downtown parking committee From: Douglas Fair, Edmonds Municipal Court Re: Juror parking permits One of the recurring issues on our juror exit surveys is their concern over the three hour parking limit on the streets adjacent to the Public Safety Complex. I contacted Debbie Dawson at the police department to explore possible solutions to this problem. She suggested that an ordinance be enacted that would allow for a juror parking permit to be used by jurors on the days that they served. I propose a new ordinance to provide juror parking permits in the area bounded by 4th Ave. N., 7th Ave. N., Bell and Daley Streets. Parking would be allowed within that area and on either side of the listed streets with a permit issued by the Court. The Court would only issue permits on the day(s) juror service would be required. The practical impact on parking in the downtown core should be negligible. We schedule jury trials every other Friday and call jurors in less than six times in an average year. After the first morning we have usually whittled the original pool of twenty-five jurors down to the six or seven that will be hearing the case. The boundaries of the area are also at least one block away from the retail core. I realize that some of the areas encompassed by the boundary already allow extended parking but that could change in the future as development pushes out from the main business core. I am not wedded to any particular boundary but simply picked this as a starting point for discussion and review. I will be happy to address any concerns the committee might have. Please call (ext. 1542) or email (fairkci.edmonds.wa.us) with any question or comments. Thank you for your time and consideration. Packet Page 149 of 202 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW SUBSECTION D INTO ECC 8.51.020 DEFINING TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT; ADDING A NEW SECTION 8.51.042 TO CHAPTER 8.51 ECC ENTITLED TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT - VALIDATION REQUIRED; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, serving jury duty is not only required by law, but it is also a civic obligation for all qualifying and nonexempt US citizens; and WHEREAS, said citizens are summoned during certain weekdays for jury duty at the Municipal Court of the city of Edmonds (the "Court"); and WHEREAS, serving jury duty at the Court can take longer than three hours for those selected to sit in the jury; and WHEREAS, jurors seated for trial who drive to Court and park in surrounding streets end up committing traffic infractions because street parking around the Court is limited to three hours; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that those fulfilling their civic duty by serving on a jury should not be penalized because they have exceeded the above referenced three hour parking limit when they are otherwise legally parked; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that parking permits should be issued to jurors seated for trial at the Court to permit them to park for the entire duration of the trial without committing a traffic infraction; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: {BFP655724.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - I - Packet Page 150 of 202 Section 1. A new Subsection D is hereby adopted into Section 8.51.020 Definitions. to read as follows: 8.51.020 Definitions. D. "Temporary employee parking permit" means a permit that authorizes jurors seated for trial at the Municipal Court of the city of Edmonds to park for more than three hours in three-hour parking areas as provided in this chapter. The temporary employee parking permit shall not guarantee a parking space, nor shall it exempt the vehicle or operator from observing other applicable traffic regulations in state and local laws. Section 2. A new section ECC 8.51.042 entitled Temporary Employee Parking Permit - Validation Required. is hereby adopted to read as follows: 8.51.042 Temporary Employee Parking Permit - Validation Required. A. The Administrator of the Municipal Court of the city of Edmonds shall issue, free of charge, temporary employee parking permits to potential jurors summoned for jury duty at the Court. Said permits shall not be valid until they are validated by the Administrator on the day of jury duty. Permits shall be valid only for the day on which they are validated. B. The Administrator shall validate only temporary employee parking permits for jurors seated for trial, and shall notify parking enforcement which temporary employee parking permits are validated on any given day when the Court is presiding over a jury trial. C. Temporary employee parking permits shall be valid only in spaces designated for public parking in the Public Safety Building parking lot and in the three-hour parking areas set forth in ECC 8.51.030(B). Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other {BFP655724.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - 2 - Packet Page 151 of 202 section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {BFP655724.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - 3 - Packet Page 152 of 202 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW SUBSECTION D INTO ECC 8.51.020 DEFINING TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT; ADDING A NEW SECTION 8.51.042 TO CHAPTER 8.51 ECC ENTITLED TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT - VALIDATION REQUIRED; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 92007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP655724.DOC;1/00006.900150/1- 4 - Packet Page 153 of 202 AM-902 3. Boys & Girls Club proclamation Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Linda Carl, Mayor's Office Submitted For: Gary Haakenson Time: 5 Minutes Department: Mayor's Office Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Proclamation in honor of Boys & Girls Club Week, March 25 - 31, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative The Boys & Girls Club mission is "To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens." The Edmonds Boys & Girls Club was established in 1968 to serve the young people of Edmonds. Today the Edmonds Boys & Girls Clubs (one of 11 clubs and 18 extension sites in Snohomish County) serves over 1,000 youth in a variety of activities that promote healthy choices in a positive atmosphere. The club provides after -school programs at the main club at310 6th Ave. N., as well as at Edmonds, College Place, Lynndale, Westgate, and Woodway Elementary Schools. Summer provides exciting opportunities for our young people to have fun with a variety of summer activities and field trips. The club also offers athletic opportunities through sports programs in cooperation with the Alderwood Boys & Girls Club and other Boys & Girls Clubs of Snohomish County. The sports program includes flag football, volleyball, soccer, basketball, T-ball and coach -pitch baseball. The Boys & Girls Club offers nationally recognized programs that address today's most pressing youth issues and teaches young people the skills they need to succeed in life. Bill Dalziel, Edmonds Boys & Girls Club Director, will be present this evening to accept the proclamation. Link: Proclamation Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 08:28 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 09:32 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 10:07 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl Started On: 03/22/2007 08:15 AM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 154 of 202 rortamation City of Edmonds • Office of the Mayor Boys & Girls Club Week March 25 - 3I7 2007 WHEREAS, The young people of Edmonds are tomorrow's leaders; and WHEREAS, many young people in our community need professional youth services to help them cope with a wide range of social and financial hardships; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Boys & Girls Club is providing services to more than 1,200 young people annually; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds and National Boys & Girls Clubs are at the forefront of efforts in substance -abuse prevention, delinquency prevention, after -school care, literacy programs, life-long sports involvement, and much more; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Boys & Girls Club helps ensure that our young people keep off the streets, offering them a safe and supportive place to go and providing them with quality, fun programs; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Boys & Girls Club will celebrate national Boys & Girls Club Week, along with approximately 4,000 clubs and more than five million young people worldwide. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Gary Haakenson, Mayor, do hereby proclaim March 25 through 31, 2007 as Boys Xc Girls Club Week in Edmonds, and urge all citizens to join me in recognizing and commending the Edmonds Boys & Girls Club for providing comprehensive, effective, and needed services to the young people in our city and the surrounding communities. Gark Ha nson, Mayor March 21, 007 Packet Page 155 of 202 AM-898 Snohomish County Tourism Bureau Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time: 20 Minutes Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Annual Report from the Snohomish County Tourism Bureau. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A 4. Narrative Amy Spain with the Snohomish County Tourism Bureau will be present at the meeting to provide an annual report for the Tourism Bureau. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/21/2007 03:23 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/21/2007 03:56 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/21/2007 04:46 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 03/21/2007 03:22 PM Final Approval Date: 03/21/2007 Packet Page 156 of 202 AM-907 S. Report from the Community Technology Advisory Committee Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Stephen Clifton, Community Services Time: 15 Minutes Department: Community Services Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Report from the Community Technology Advisory Committee. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative The presentation will be accompanied by PowerPoint slides. Link: Exhibit 1 Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:23 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 02:24 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Clifton Started On: 03/22/2007 01:38 PM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 157 of 202 v 0 0 L N CD CD 0 0 0 (C) D Q- (� 0 0 0 3 3 CD 0 0 w 0 cn CD 0 i t� mn a m a 3 a y Packet Page 158 of 202 O C• CD Q �C CD E)l � n � � a � CD C_D CD O CD CD O CD CD C Cr) CD - , CD C�. `Z . � C CD Cn 0 ^-f. CD � � iy CD CD �` a CD CD CD Q C CD Packet Page 159 of 202 i i i i i ; a a 01-1 cD N CD CD to CD CD CD n' : a cD n ° = : O CD =. ° = : y y CD � CD y�. c�D 3 CD n �� y, CD y ° a y 0 CD O CD .�, CD CD ` �. nEio CD CD � m► O O CD CD Packet Page 160 of 202 • • • • • T r+ CD O %< 0 < C:) x Z 0 IV O N� N �■ O O O O O O CD 0 D N MIL� O n O — � 0 (D(D n n ° -� o C1 Z O �� rn rn (D 0 W U (D CD h U' � ■ (n C� ( 0 O -+ CAD Cr ■ O h =3 (DD r- O 1 O Packet Page 161 of 202 -' CD C r'' O w I --, ■ -0 N' �, O 0 0 0 O N CO CD (DD CD ( "1 3 CD 51) CD r+ 0 cn N W N m I m Oo�'o ���C� �■ C) C� _n (n O rn 3 rn �Cp rn o CO 0r-� W - o �- rn rn �■ w- CD O 3 CD o O Packet Page 162 of 202 =� 1 0 zz000� O CAD l< CD 0 - < 3 (n (D o� o� o� o U) Packet Page 163 of 202 0 i�: O 3� 3 O O (D C:) O (n' 4 CD n no 0. C� rn O 3 rn cn O 90 o' v E o' m O h CD a O D in N O O A I C� O 3 3 rn rn 0 3 rn rn o �1 � N O O O � I �O z� o (D —(D U) rn D o' z rn rn 11 O zT N O O 11 rr C fD Packet Page 164 of 202 0 • x 3 (n ro--I- (D 0 � CD 16D � (D � �CD� �3 o v �� o rn CD o U)( . ,{ o 0- (D x �. . co U) co �7� Mh PIL (D 04 3 d A s al - �-�l N rt m N Packet Page 165 of 202 Packet Page 166 of 202 AM-904 6. Revised Animal Control Provisions Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 03/27/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Submitted For: Scott Snyder, City Attorney Time: 60 Minutes Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Agenda Memo Subiect Title Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Chapter 5.05 of the Edmonds City Code relating to Animal Control. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The attached ordinance, Version A, was drafted by the City Attorney in response to Council direction. Version B of the ordinance reflects Councilmember Plunkett's request. The staff s recommendation remains the same: there is not a significant public problem requiring the city to become involved in what is essentially a private dispute between property owners. The original staff recommended ordinance is attached as Version C. Previous Council Action On February 20, 2007, the City Council passed the following motions: Councilmember Dawson moved, seconded by Councilmember Moore, to direct staff to come back with an ordinance that specifically precludes the trapping of pet/companion animals and requires if an animal is trapped, the protections in the proposed ordinance be included therein. Councilmember Plunkett moved, seconded by Councilmember Wambolt, to amend the motion to include direction to the City Attorney to develop language clarifying that Animal Control could, under certain circumstances to be determined, be called out to effectuate trapping of a cat. Motion carried unanimously. The main motion as amended carried unanimously. Narrative Attached you will find copies of the following documents: 1. Memorandum prepared by City Attorney Scott Snyder dated March 15, 2007. 2. Version A - Proposed Ordinance 3. Version B - Proposed Ordinance 4. Version C - Proposed Ordinance 5. February 20, 2007 City Council Minutes 6. Additional correspondence received in the City Council Office on this topic. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - City Attorney Memo Link: Exhibit 2 - Version A Ordinance Link: Exhibit 3 - Version B Ordinance Link: Exhibit 4 - Version C Ordinance Link: Exhibit 5 - Feb 20 Minutes Link: Exhibit 6 - Additional Correspondence Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 02:50 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/22/2007 02:59 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/22/2007 03:04 PM APRV Packet Page 167 of 202 Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 03/22/2007 10:03 AM Final Approval Date: 03/22/2007 Packet Page 168 of 202 D 6T,.EN Ii ALLACE R l.. 1 C. ATTORNEYS AT L A W MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2007 TO: Edmonds City Council City of Edmonds FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney RE: Revisions to the City's Animal Control Provisions At the CounciI's direction I have prepared an ordinance which: 1. Prohibits the unlawful capture or confinement of a pet; 2. Makes it unlawful for a person to use a trap to capture a domestic animal, covered animal or pet, with certain exceptions; 3. Prohibits the negligent confinement of an animal (Ieaving an animal in a trap); and 4. Makes it an infraction (similar to a parking ticket) to fail to take reasonable steps to keep an animal on your own property after being notified that it is trespassing on property of a neighbor. As a defense to the trapping procedures, the ordinance permits a property owner to trap through the use of a professional abatement contract -- that is, entities that establish their qualifications as a professional animal welfare contractor with experience in the use of humane traps to capture, care for, and transport the animal. These provisions, which are admittedly extensive, were drafted in an attempt to comprehensively address the City Council's concerns. I tried to incorporate the input from a variety of positions on the Council. Three Council members clearly wish to prohibit trapping, three Council members with to minimize City involvement in that effort, and one Council member wanted to provide a mechanism for the humane trapping of pets by a professional. As I previously pointed out to the Council in e-mail communications, I began with a number of practical concerns: A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 • Seattle, WA 98101-1686 . 206,447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 . Web: www.omwlow.com f WSS654353.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Packet Page 169 of 202 Edmonds City Council March 15, 2007 Page 2 1. Proving that someone intentionally trapped a pet requires a high burden of proof. In simple terms, a person could always say that he or she did not know a pet was trapped until they opened the trap. For that reason, I provided a range of offenses from gross misdemeanors through infractions addressing different issues. 2. There was an assumption on the part of the City Council that the City has the capability to effectively trap a trespassing animal. As a practical matter, however, the City does not have an animal control officer on staff 24 hours a day. In fact, given that animal control officers also perform other functions for the City, there is animal control coverage in the City only about 40% of the time. Given the Council's concern regarding animals being left in humane traps, placing the City's animal control officers in charge of trapping creates a difficult dilemma. If they remove the traps when no animal control officer is on duty, there is no guarantee they can effectively capture the animals. On the other hand, if they leave the traps out, animals may be injured or traumatized by being left in the traps - the very problem that a number of citizens and the majority of Council members wish to avoid. Therefore, I identified other resources for the safe, professional trapping of animals. Finally, you will note that the ordinance assigns responsibility to pet owners to take "reasonable steps" to keep their animal from trespassing. The ordinance will restrict civilly available remedies of real property owners. To provide some balance, the draft ordinance requires a property owner to notify neighbors or the animal owner, if known, that the property owner has a trespassing problem and intends to trap. If the animal owner fails to take reasonable steps to keep his animal on his or her property, and it is captured, the draft provides that the property owner may be liable for a civil infraction (a small financial penalty) and share in the costs of capture and impoundment. If the animal is one that is required to have a license (a dog) and the animal is not licensed, the animal owner pays the full costs of trapping and impoundment. I recognize this is an extremely complicated area. I tried to incorporate the Council's direction in a comprehensive ordinance. As noted, the staff continues to believe that this is an isolated problem that does not require City involvement. The Council, however, has directed the preparation of an ordinance, a copy of which is attached for your consideration. AIso attached is a draft prepared at Mr. Plunkett's request that prohibits trapping but recognizes that other non lethal means may be used to drive away a trespassing animal. WSS:gjz Attachments Packet Page 170 of 202 0006.900000 WSS/gjz 2/27/07 R:3/6/07gjz R:3/12/07gjz Version A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO A ANIMAL CONTROL BY AMENDING SECTION 5.05.010 TO ADD A NEW DEFINITION FOR "PET" AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 5.05.110 CRIMES RELATING TO THE CONFINEMENT OF ANOTHER'S ANIMAL AND THE ABATEMENT OF PRIVATE NUISANCES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the owners of pets and other animals have a common law property interest in their pets as personal property, and WHEREAS, the owners of real property have a right to the quiet enjoyment of their property and to be free of trespassing individuals and animals, and WHEREAS, the balancing of these rights should, in most cases, be worked out between neighboring property owners without the involvement of the City, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the trapping of pets for the purpose of depriving an owner of the pet's company and enjoyment should be a criminal act and that the use of traps, by person unfamiliar with their use, may result in injuries to pets, and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to establish rules for the private abatement of nuisance animals within the City limits while making other acts, potentially harmful to the welfare of animals, crimes or civil infractions, NOW, THEREFORE, WSS653587.DOC;1/00006.900000/I - 1 - Packet Page 171 of 202 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.05.010 Definitions is hereby amended by the addition of a new section L, and the renumbering of current sections L through Q to accommodate the addition of the new definition, such definition to read as follows: 5.05.010 Definitions. L. "Pet" is a domestic animal owned and kept by an individual or family for enjoyment and pleasure rather than utility. The terns "pet" includes all animals required to be licensed under the terrns of this chapter when properly licensed. Section 2. Chapter 5.05. Animal Control is hereby amended by the addition of a new section 5.05.110 Crimes relating to the confinement of another's animal and the abatement of private nuisances. 5.05.110 Crimes relating to the confinement of anther's animal and the abatement of private nuisances. A. An owner of private real property has the right under Washington common and statutory law to protect his or her property from trespass by persons or other instrumentalities including covered and domestic animals such as pets. The City Council finds that the exercise of these civil rights are limited by animal cruelty laws and other ordinances and statutes intended to protect the health and safety of animals. Further, the City Council finds that the inappropriate or negligent use of even humane traps may pose a threat to animals and therefore prohibits the use of all traps except under the conditions set forth in this ordinance. B. Crimes. 1. Unlawful capture or confinement of a pet. A person is guilty of crime of the unlawful capture or confinement of a pet if a person traps, captures or otherwise confines an animal known by the person to be the pet of another. The unlawful capture or confinement of a pet shall be a gross misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 5.50.020. {WSS653587.D0Q1/00006.9000W/} - 2 - Packet Page 172 of 202 2. Trapping. It shall be unlawful for any person by means of a trap or similar mechanical device to intentionally trap a domestic animal, covered animal or pet. Trapping shall be a misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 5.50.020. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit a property owner from using other lawful means to drive off a covered and domestic animal or pet of another. 3. Negligent confinement of an animal. A person is guilty of the crime of negligent confinement of an animal if a person who traps, captures or confines an animal fails to promptly release an animal which the person knows or should have known to be confined and which is not the property of that person. The term "release" shall include a report to a law enforcement or animal control officer of the City of Edmonds. Negligent confinement of an animal shall be a misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 5.50.020. 4. Negligent maintenance of an animal. A person is guilty of the negligent maintenance of an animal if, following receipt of notice as provided in Section D(1) (a) below fails to take reasonable steps to prevent a covered animal, domestic animal or pet from trespassing on the property of another. Negligent maintenance of a pet shall be a civil infraction punishable by a civil fine of $100 by occurrence, in addition to the charges incurred and defined below in Section D(2). C. Defenses. The following acts are excluded from the crime of unlawful capture or confinement of a pet as set forth in Section B(1) or trapping as set forth in Section B(2) above: 1. The capture, trapping or confinement of an injured or diseased animal in order to protect the animal from harm or in order to deliver or report the animal to a veterinarian, animal control officer, Washington State wildlife official, animal shelter or other charitable or governmental agency charged with animal welfare and protection. 2. The abatement of a private nuisance pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section D below. and/or 3. The actions of a city, county or state animal control officer, law enforcement officer or other public safety officer in the performance of his or her duties. D. Abatement procedures; Nuisance animals. {WSSG53587.DOC;1/0000G.900000/} -3- Packet Page 173 of 202 1. Any person whose property is repeatedly trespassed upon by a covered animal, a domestic animal, or the pet of another (hereinafter "trespassing animal") may, in addition to any other method available at law and not prohibited by State law or City ordinance, apply for the capture of the trespassing animal under the following procedures: a. Notice. The property owner shall attempt to notify the owner of the trespassing animal by: L written notice deposited postage paid in the U.S. Mail to the owner of the trespassing animal; or ii. If the owner of the animal is not known to the property owner, by mailing written notice to the person shown as the owner of property in the records of Snohomish County tax roles, to all properties within 300 feet of the boundary lines of the complainant owner's property. The notice shall describe the animal, the nature and frequency of the trespass, the address of the property trespassed upon by the animal and a telephone number or e-mail address where the property owner may be reached. Notices to the pet owners shall be by certified mail, return receipt requested. Notice to property owners shall be confirmed by the sworn affidavit of the property owner. b. Cooperative solutions urged. Animal owners and property owners are encouraged to find cooperative solutions to their problems. Therefore, following the mailing of written notice, a minimum of fourteen (14) calendar days shall pass before the following abatement procedures may be instituted. 2. Use of professional abatement contractor. A property owner who has complied with the notification procedures set forth above may then proceed to apply to a third party contractor from a list maintained by the City to trap, capture and/or confine animals within the City of Edmonds. a. The property owner shall certify that he or she has complied with the notice procedures set forth above. b. The property owner shall post a deposit equal to the estimated cost of capturing the trespassing animal. Except as expressly provided below, the property owner shall bear all costs associated with having a professional animal welfare contractor set a trap, monitor the trap, promptly release a trapped animal, care for any injuries incurred in the process of trapping ;WSS653587.DOQ1/00006.900000/j - 4 - Packet Page 174 of 202 and/or capturing the animal and transporting the animal to impoundment under the provision of ECC 5.05.126. C. If the owner of the captured trespassing animal has been notified as provided above and has failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the trespass which resulted in the capture of the animal, he or she is guilty of a civil infraction and in addition to any other penalty provided in this chapter, the owner of the trespassing animal shall be assessed a civil infraction fine, one- half of the capture costs and allcosts of impoundment. If the captured animal is subject to the licensing laws of this chapter and does not have a valid license, in addition to any other fines levied under this chapter, shall be assessed a civil infraction fine equal to the entire cost of trapping, capturing, care and impoundment of the animal. The court may, in its discretion, order restitution to the complaining property owner in lieu of the amount of the relevant fine. 3. Any trap set pursuant to these abatement procedures shall be set only on the private property of the complaining property owner. 4. The preparation and maintenance of a list of contractors is intended. to provide for property owners a resource consisting of knowledgeable agencies trained in the safe and humane capture, transport and impoundment of animals. The list shall be nonexclusive, and any entity which can establish its experience and qualifications is eligible to be included. No duty special relationship is assumed or implied by the creation and maintenance of the list by the City and no third party liability shall be created by a contract entered into between the property owner and the contractor. E. The civil infractions referenced in this section shall be processed in accordance with the Infraction Rules of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (IRi T) and may be appealed in accordance with the Rules for Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (RAU). Section 3. The Mayor and staff are hereby authorized to initiate a procedure to obtain requests for proposals from animal control agencies, private companies and/or animal welfare protection organizations that are skilled in the humane capture, confinement and treatment of animals. Such agencies shall provide their qualifications and shall utilize only {WSS653587.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Page 175 of 202 lawful methods available under the laws of the State of Washington. Trapping and capture shall use safe and humane methods commonly in use throughout the State and authorized by Washington State. The City Attorney shall develop a third -party contract for use by such agencies. All such contracts shall be between the agency and private property owners seeking abatement. All contractual obligations shall run between the property owner and the contractor, and no liability of any kind or nature shall accrue to the City of Edmonds or to its citizens, provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit or impair the ability of the Judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Edmonds, to levy, as a civil infraction, the cost of capture, trapping, care and impoundment of a trespassing animal as set forth in City ordinance. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance, being subject to referendum, shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title, unless a referendum petition is filed pursuant to Chapter 35A.1 I RCW. MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS653587.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - Packet Page 176 of 202 APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSSG53587.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 - Packet Page 177 of 202 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO A ANIMAL CONTROL BY AMENDING SECTION 5.05.010 TO ADD A NEW DEFINITION FOR "PET' AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 5.05.110 CRIMES RELATING TO THE CONFINEMENT OF ANOTHER'S ANIMAL AND THE ABATEMENT OF PRIVATE NUISANCES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 52007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE (WSS653587.D0C;1/00006.9W000/}- 8 - Packet Page 178 of 202 0006.900000 WSS/gjz 2/27/07 R:3/6/07gjz R:3/12/07gjz Version B ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO A ANIMAL CONTROL BY AMENDING SECTION 5.05.010 TO ADD A NEW DEFINITION FOR "PET" AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 5.05.110 CRIMES RELATING TO THE CONFINEMENT OF ANOTHER'S ANIMAL, AND FIXING A TRAEE WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the trapping of pets for the purpose of depriving an owner of the pet's company and enjoyment should be a criminal act, and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to establish rules for the private abatement of nuisance animals within the City limits while making other acts, potentially harmful to the welfare of animals, crimes or civil infractions, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.05.010 Definitions is hereby amended by the addition of a new section L, and the renumbering of current sections L through Q to accommodate the addition of the new definition, such definition to read as follows: 5.05.010 Definitions. L. "Pet" is a domestic animal owned and kept by an individual or family for enjoyment and pleasure rather than utility. The term (WSS654863.D0C;1/00006.900000/) - 1 - Packet Page 179 of 202 "pet" includes all animals required to be licensed under the terms of this chapter when properly Iicensed. Section 2. Chapter 5.05. Animal Control is hereby amended by the addition of a new section 5.05.110 Crimes relating to the confinement of another's animal and the abatement of private nuisances. 5.05.110 Crimes relating to the confinement of another's animal and the abatement of private nuisances. A. An owner of private real property has the right under Washington common and statutory law to protect his or her property from trespass by persons or other instrumentalities including covered and domestic animals such as pets. The City Council finds that the exercise of these civil rights are limited by animal cruelty laws and other ordinances and statutes intended to protect the health and safety of animals. Further, the City Council finds that the inappropriate or negligent use of even humane traps may pose a threat to animals and therefore prohibits the use of all traps except under the conditions set forth in this ordinance. B. Crimes. 1. Unlawful capture or confinement of a pet. A person is guilty of crime of the unlawful capture or confinement of a pet if a person traps, captures or otherwise confines an animal known by the person to be the pet of another. The unlawful capture or confinement of a pet shall be a gross misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 5.50.020. 2. Trapping. It shall be unlawful for any person by means of a trap or similar mechanical device to intentionally trap a domestic animal, covered animal or pet. Trapping shall be a misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 5.50.020. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit a property owner from using other lawful means to drive off a covered and domestic animal or pet of another. 3. Negligent confinement of an animal. A person is guilty of the crime of negligent confinement of an animal if a person who traps, captures or confines an animal fails to promptly release an animal which the person knows or should have known to be confined and which is not the property of that person. The term "release" shall include a report to a law enforcement or animal control officer of the City of Edmonds. Negligent IWSS654863.DOC;1/00006.900000/} -2- Packet Page 180 of 202 confinement of an animal shall be a misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 5.50.020. C. Defenses. The following acts are excluded from the crime of unlawful capture or confinement of a pet as set forth in Section B(1) or trapping as set forth in Section B(2) above: 1. The capture, trapping or confinement of an- injured or diseased animal in order to protect the animal from harm or in order to deliver or report the animal to a veterinarian, animal control officer, Washington State wildlife official, animal shelter or other charitable or governmental agency charged with animal welfare and protection; and/or 2. The actions of a city, county or state animal control officer, law enforcement officer or other public safety officer in the performance of his or her duties. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being subject to referendum, shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title, unless a referendum petition is filed pursuant to Chapter 35A.11 RCW. MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS654863.D0C;1/00006.900000/) - 3 - Packet Page 181 of 202 APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. (WSS654861DOC;1/00006.900000/) - 4 - Packet Page 182 of 202 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO A ANIMAL CONTROL BY AMENDING SECTION 5.05.010 TO ADD A NEW DEFINITION FOR "PET" AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 5.05.110 CRIMES RELATING TO THE CONFINEMENT OF ANOTHER'S ANIMAL, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of .12007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS654863.DOC;I100006.90000011- 5 - Packet Page 183 of 202 Version C ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, domesticated animals running at large have been trespassing onto private property; and WHEREAS, said animals have been trapped by property owners onto whose properties they trespass; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds animals at large that are detained must be treated humanely; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON; DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.05.050 is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.05.050 Running at large prohibited. A. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person having charge, care, custody or control of any animal to allow said animal to run at large. B. A person who lawfully captures or detains an animal trespassing onto private property and or at large must do so without applying unreasonable force or inflicting more pain or harm to said animal than the situation reasonably requires. The person detaining the animal shall be responsible for the care and custody of the animal, and shall notify animal control authority of detention within 12 hours thereof. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to create a defense to any crime or civil infraction relating to animal cruelty, including, but not limited to, ECDC 5.05.128 or RCW 16.52.205, et seq. {SFP652551.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - 2/16/2007 Packet Page 184 of 202 C. Subsection A shall not apply to the following animals: 1. Domestic cats. 2. Animals owned by government agencies that are maintained for law enforcement purposes while under the custody and control of the trainer or keeper. D. Subsection B shall not apply to government agencies in charged of public safety, animals owned by said agencies that are maintained for law enforcement purposes while under the custody and control of the trainer or keeper, or to entities licensed by federal, state or local government agencies to detain nuisance animals. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect sixty (60) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: :1 W. SCOTT SNYDER {BFP652551.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - 2/ 16/2007 Packet Page 185 of 202 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {BFP652551.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - 2/16/2007 Packet Page 186 of 202 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2006, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED ANIMALS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2006. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP652551.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 - 2/16/2007 Packet Page 187 of 202 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES February 20, 2007 Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding a real estate matter, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT David Stern, Chief of Police Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Kathleen Junglov, Asst. Admin. Services Dir. Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dave Gebert, City Engineer Debi Humann, Human Resources Manager Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Orvis requested Items I and N be removed from the Consent Agenda and Councilmember Moore requested Item J be removed. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL pprove 2/6/07 inutes B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2007. pprove Claim C. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS CHECKS #93978 THROUGH #94206 FOR FEBRUARY 8, 2007 becks IN THE AMOUNT OF $578,468.54 AND #94207 THROUGH #94365 FOR FEBRUARY 15, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $541,563.29. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #44468 THROUGH #44504 FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 16 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $789,517.19. Claims for D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM LEE AND PAM amages MCALLISTER ($1,000.00), GREGG PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES ($163,000.00 AND CONTINUING), AND DIANNE ROTH LAUER ($3,998.00). Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 1 Packet Page 188 of 202 Stormwater Engineering E. RATIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT OFFER TO STORMWATER ENGINEERING Program Mgr' PROGRAM MANAGER. 92nd Ave W & F. APPROPRIATION OF $11,000 AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN 34th St SW CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR THE 92ND AVENUE WEST/234TH STREET Improvements SW INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. ake Ballinger G. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR LAKE [Lake Level BALLINGER LAKE LEVEL STUDY AND TO ADVERTISE FOR STATEMENTS OF Study QUALIFICATION FROM CONSULTANTS FOR THE STUDY. Taxicab Operator's H. APPROVAL OF 2007 TAXICAB OPERATOR'S LICENSE FOR LOW FARE AIRPORT License AND LOCAL FOR HIRE VEHICLE. risoner Detention K. APPROVAL OF 2007 ADDENDUM TO PRISONER DETENTION AGREEMENT WITH Agreement CITY OF LYNNWOOD. lnterlocal L. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Agreement for BETWEEN THE CITY OF BOTHELL AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS, IN Purchase of ac ackhoe CONJUNCTION WITH N.C. MACHINERY FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) NEW BACKHOE IN THE AMOUNT OF $98,272.63, INCLUDING TAX. es# 1141— M. RESOLUTION NO. 1141 — SUPPORTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND blic Health RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC HEALTH Financing FINANCING. Ord# 3628 O. ORDINANCE NO. 3628 — AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY D Zone in Other Code DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS 17.50.040(B); 17.50.070(B); 17.75.010; 17.75.020; Provisions 20.50.040(B); 20.50.050(C); 20.50.060(C); 20.60.005; 20.60.025; 20.60.030; 20.60.035; 20.60.045 (B); AND 20.60.080 IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF THE BD ZONE IN OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CODE NOW REFERENCING THE BC OR CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONE. Hearing ITEM L• PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Examiner SERVICES Agreement Councilmember Orvis reported he participated in the interview of three sets of candidates and recommended Toweill Rice Taylor to provide Hearing Examiner services. He explained this was a group of three individuals who alternated providing Hearing Examiner services which would ensure one of them was always available. He recalled during their interview they emphasized the importance of citing the record to justify how an application met the code and cited their decisions in other municipalities in their application materials. He was also impressed with their knowledge of variances and the legal issues surrounding variances. They also emphasized their desire to listen to people at hearings. Councilmember Marin advised he also participated in the interview process and was impressed with this group of attorneys' expertise and their focus on providing Hearing Examiner services. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM I. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The item approved is as follows: I. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER SERVICES. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 189 of 202 egal Services ITEM J: AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS AND OGDEN greement MURPHY WALLACE, P.L.L.C. Councilmember Moore referred to Mayor Haakenson's email regarding the January legal bill, and asked whether the Council wanted to discuss Ogden Murphy Wallace's bills. She acknowledged Council President Olson and Mayor Haakenson planned to discuss finances at the retreat and it may be appropriate to discuss legal expenses at that time. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM J. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The item approved is as follows: J: AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS AND OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, P.L.L.C. ew zones for ITEM N: PROPOSED ORDINANCE CREATING TWO NEW ZONES FOR THE EDMONDS WAY Edmonds Way CORRIDOR. Corridor COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM N. City Attorney Scott Snyder referred to the suggestions he made which were also provided to the applicant. The applicant did not respond, therefore, he assumed his suggestions were acceptable. He inquired whether the Council had any feedback regarding the frontage requirement which states the ground floor must be devoted to retail if it was 150 feet but if longer than 150 feet, 60% must be devoted to retail. He pointed out a frontage of 151 feet would require only approximately 90 feet of retail. Planning Manager Rob Chave suggested if the Council wanted to consider that requirement further, the Planning Board revisit that particular provision but it did not require a change to the ordinance tonight. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT, MOORE AND MARIN IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON, PLUNKETT AND ORVIS OPPOSED. The item approved is as follows: Ord# 3627 New zones for ORDINANCE NO. 3627 — AMENDING CHAPTER 16.30 RM-MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL AND Edmonds Way CHAPTER 16.50 BC -COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE CERTAIN Corridor CHANGES REGARDING ZONING REQUIREMENTS ALONG EDMONDS WAY. Safe Food 3. RECOGNITION OF "EXCELLENCE AWARD" FOR SAFE FOOD HANDLING RECEIVED BY Handling ARBY'S RESTAURANT. Award (Arby's) Councilmember Marin, Snohomish County Health Board Member, advised that Arby's Restaurant on Hwy. 99 received an Excellence Award from the Snohomish County Health Board for safe food handling. He explained his wife and he often visit this restaurant and were impressed with their practices that include the use of mystery shoppers to ensure the use of best practices. Councilmember Moore commented this was not meant to imply that the other food establishments in Edmonds were not up to the same standards. Councilmember Marin acknowledged it was very difficult to select the best of the best because there were so many restaurants utilizing best practices. itle 7 Utility 4. MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 7 UTILITY BILLING UPDATE. filling Update Administrative Services Director Dan Clements explained the proposed ordinance was primarily housekeeping changes; two business practice changes included, 1) suspension of bills for homes that were vacant for 60 days, and 2) applicability of delinquent charges. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 190 of 202 With regard to suspension of bills for vacant homes, Mr. Clements explained the current code did not allow for suspension of utility bills, yet the practice had been to stop billing for a home that was vacant for more than 60 days. Staff found the City was not following the code; abiding by the code would impact approximately 50 of the City's 11,000 customers via a base charge of $90 for each two month period. If the resident opted to have their water turned off and on, there would be a $20 fee. With regard to delinquency charges, staff found delinquency fees were not charged on one of the six water meter routes and customers on one route were billed monthly rather than bimonthly. Staff found there would be efficiencies incorporating the one monthly billed route into the five remaining routes and recommends instituting the same delinquency policy for all customers. He advised implementation would take a number of months as it would be necessary to move customers to the other five billing routes. Councilmember Orvis commented the logic for charging a home that was vacant was because most of the charge was for the infrastructure, the pipes. Mr. Clements agreed, noting there would be no charge for consumption if the house was vacant. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 3629. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance approved reads as follows: Ord# 3629 ORDINANCE NO. 3629 - AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 7.10 ECC ON WATER Title 7 Utility SERVICE, ECC 7.30.070 ON WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE REDUCTIONS FOR Billing Update LOW INCOME CITIZENS, ECC 7.40.040 ON MONTHLY FIRE SERVICE CHARGES, REPEALING ECC 3.50.030 ON DELINQUENCY CHARGE, ADOPTING ECC 7.10.025 ON DELINQUENCY CHARGE, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. Public Hearing 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECC 5.05.050 EDMONDS CITY CODE SECTION 5.05.050 PROHIBITING ANIMALS FROM RUNNING AT Prohibiting LARGE, REQUIRING HUMANE TREATMENT AND NOTIFICATION OF DETAINED Animals from Running at ANIMALS. Large Police Chief David Stern explained this was a continuation of the discussion regarding the proposed ordinance. He referred to the clarifications provided by City Attorney Scott Snyder in the ordinance which he noted better represented staff s intent. Mr. Snyder advised staff attempted to follow-up on all the citizen comments and questions. He explained this was an example of legislative balancing between a problem and how to correct the problem. Councilmember Orvis asked whether there was anything in the code that prevented a person from detaining a stray with the intent of providing it a home. Mr. Snyder responded both the City ordinance and State statute prohibit abuse of animals. As animals are a form of personal property, it could be theft to detain an animal with a tag or chip. He concluded as long as it was done with reasonable care and force, it would not be illegal. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Ray Martin, Edmonds, relayed when he picked up his cat Turbo who had been trapped, he appeared to have been beaten, was terrified, hungry and filthy, had cuts on his face and body and had his identification removed. He disagreed with the assertion that his cat had been trapped in a humane manner and objected to the proposed ordinance that would allow humane trapping of animals. He commented on the trapping of his cat by a neighbor, orchestrated by animal control. He provided a statement from the animal control officers regarding red marks that were not bleeding on his cat's face, compared with a statement from the veterinarian that the cat was very dirty and had areas of bruising and hair loss below Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 191 of 202 each eye. He provided a statement from the animal control officer stating the City did not use that type of trap and stating the injuries on the cat's face were consistent with injuries on animals captured in humane traps caused by attempts to escape from the trap. He provided a Wikipedia definition of cage traps and a picture of his injured cat. He recommended the Council not approve the proposed ordinance, concluding the live trapping of animals with malicious intent was intolerable and recommending any necessary trapping be done by a qualified professional. Robert McCallum, Edmonds, commented animal control had been very fair with everyone involved in this incident. He advised the animal control officer left the cat's tags at the shelter and returned them the next day. He voiced his support for the ordinance, advising it was fair for everyone and provided protection for the animal by requiring it be treated in a lawful and humane way if captured or detained. He pointed out the dangers of cats running at large from vehicles, wildlife, dogs, etc. He suggested cat owners keep their pets inside or install an invisible fence. He described birds that visit their yard. He advised since the cat was trapped in September, there had not been any further sightings of the cat or interaction/argument between the neighbors. He urged the Council to adopt the ordinance in an effort to respect each other's property and to keep unwanted pets off others' property. Marge Martin, Edmonds, commented this had been the worst experience she had in the 37 years living in Edmonds. As an animal lover, she could not imagine trapping a pet. She disagreed this was a neighborhood dispute, pointing out the person who trapped their cat had been a friend and business associate for over 20 years. She was concerned the proposed ordinance would lead to vigilante tactics and prankster trappings. She pointed out the property owned by the person who trapped their cat abuts a large wooded area and there were still numerous cats frequenting that area. She advised their cat had been kept in for ten days prior to being trapped, and the cat raced out the door that day. When their cat was returned after being trapped he was bloody, cut to the bone and it was devastating to see your pet this way. She would not like to see anyone else experience this. Cheryl Lynn Ram, Edmonds, relayed her experience with a neighbor who trapped squirrels, explaining she released an injured squirrel from the trap when they were out of town. She reported this to the City and was told this was not allowed. She also relayed to City staff that the squirrels were being drowned in the person's garage. She did not want cats treated the same way as the squirrels. Laura Martin, Edmonds, explained under Washington State law a person was guilty of animal cruelty in the first degree when they intentionally inflicted pain or physical injury or killed an animal by causing undue suffering or inflicting unnecessary pain or death on the animal. She explained her cat was trapped and inflicted with unnecessary pain and injury and was denied medical attention until he was returned over 24 hours after being trapped. She relayed that Washington State law also required a person be authorized to trap animals. She questioned why the City would legalize trapping of cats when cats were non -threatening animals as compared to dogs. She questioned the purpose of trapping cats other than injuring the animal. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, preferred a leash law for cats as there was for dogs. He questioned whether a recent initiative that prohibited trapping of animals would apply to trapping of cats by a private party. He preferred any trapping be conducted by the animal control officer. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Wambolt asked Mr. Snyder how many cat trapping incidents he had encountered in the 20 years he had been the City Attorney. Mr. Snyder answered this was the first. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 192 of 202 Councilmember Orvis asked staff to comment on the State law that prohibited animal trapping. Mr. Snyder answered the distinction was traps that kill and traps that did not. Even with a humane trap, there were State and local prohibitions against animal cruelty and intent to deprive the owner. He emphasized there was nothing in the City's current ordinance that prohibited the humane use of traps and there was nothing in the proposed ordinance that authorized the use of traps. Staff s recommendation focuses on the humane treatment of animals after they were lawfully collected. He concluded it was staff s position this was not a problem that warranted the use of City resources. Councilmember Plunkett thanked Mr. Martin for his passion and expressed empathy for Turbo. He described his successful and humane efforts to trap feral cats that were then taken to veterinarians and adopted. He advised the traps were provided by PAWS who encouraged the trapping of feral cats. He questioned whether this was a large enough problem that warranted the use of City resources. He expressed his thanks to Mr. Snyder for his research of this issue. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO.3630. Councilmember Orvis commented although he did not like the idea of trapping pets, he acknowledged traps had other uses such as trapping strays. He noted some other cities' ordinances contained provisions that allowed citizens to trap a stray in order to adopt it. He reiterated that under the City's current ordinance, trapping was legal with no rules regarding the treatment of the animals. The proposed ordinance did not authorize trapping but imposed regulations with regard to the treatment of the animal. With regard to the suggestion that citizens not be allowed to trap animals, he noted a citizen with a trap on their property was better prepared to monitor a trap than the animal control officer who had other constraints on their time. Councilmember Marin supported the ordinance due to the additional language that protected the animal and the animal's owner that did not exist in the current ordinance. He recalled the original proposal was a person was allowed 24 hours to deliver the animal to the City's custody; the Public Safety Committee reduced the time to 12 hours which would increase the likelihood of humane treatment of the animal. Councilmember Wambolt spoke against the ordinance, recalling when living in Woodway many cats traversed through their property, an experience he missed living downtown. He commented this issue had been blown out of proportion and could be addressed via adding one sentence to the ordinance to protect the animal by requiring the trapping be done by animal control. He concluded trapping cats caused more damage to the animal than the animal could do to the property, thus the ordinance placed more emphasis on protecting property than the animal. Councilmember Dawson did not support the ordinance although she appreciated staff and Councilmembers' efforts to develop a reasonable compromise. She was troubled that the ordinance would allow residents to trap someone else's pet that entered their property. She found the proposed ordinance did authorize trapping because it specifically allowed trapping. She concurred it was not safe for cats to be outdoor animals due to potential injury from wildlife but any harm that could be caused by a cat could also be caused by wildlife. She advised in Washington cats and dogs were considered personal property although some people feel their pets were family members and she did not support allowing the trapping of a family member. She agreed if a person's animal trespassed on someone's property, the animal's owner was liable for damages. With regard to the question about what purpose the ordinance served, she was concerned with the potential for mischief via the proposed ordinance. She questioned specifically excluding cats from the prohibition of roaming animals which would allow cats to roam at large and yet authorize people to trap them when they came onto their property. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 6 Packet Page 193 of 202 Councilmember Moore agreed with Councilmember Dawson, commenting she was opposed to trapping any animal and more importantly someone's pet. She requested the Council be provided a photograph of a humane trap. She did not support the ordinance. Council President Olson pointed out the current ordinance allowed trapping. Mr. Snyder agreed it was within an individual's civil and legal rights if it was done using reasonable force and means and it was not currently illegal in the city. Council President Olson pointed out an ordinance containing regulations requiring humane treatment was preferable to the current ordinance. She supported the ordinance, noting if residents were going to trap animals, it was preferable to have requirements on the length of time they could be detained and requiring humane treatment of the animal. Councilmember Plunkett commented the Council could make it illegal for an individual to trap an animal. Mr. Snyder agreed. Councilmember Plunkett relayed that the question was then whether it was a burden for animal control to do the trapping. Council President Olson commented if trapping were illegal, it would be difficult to trap feral cats and have them spayed/neutered. She did not support making trapping illegal. Councilmember Dawson suggested prohibiting the intentional trapping of a companion animal which would allow trapping of strays and feral cats. Councilmember Wambolt recalled the recent initiative that outlawed trapping of moles; he found it odd that a person could not trap a nuisance mole but could trap a cat. Mr. Snyder commented the difference was the lethal nature of the traps versus a humane trap. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS MARIN AND ORVIS IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT, MOORE, DAWSON AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED. Councilmember Plunkett suggested the Public Safety Committee discuss distinguishing between a domestic and feral cat. Mayor Haakenson asked what happened if no action was taken. Mr. Snyder answered with no change to the ordinance, the protections in the proposed ordinance would not be adopted. He observed four Councilmembers appeared to be interested in limiting the trapping of animals and suggested the Council provide direction to staff and not direct them to study it further. COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK WITH AN ORDINANCE THAT SPECIFICALLY PRECLUDES THE TRAPPING OF PET/COMPANION ANIMALS AND REQUIRES IF AN ANIMAL IS TRAPPED, THE PROTECTIONS IN THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE INCLUDED THEREIN. Councilmembers Moore and Dawson requested staff also provide information regarding humane traps. Councilmember Wambolt did not support the motion, preferring that the current ordinance be revised to require animal control do any trapping. Councilmember Plunkett suggested adding that any trapping involve an animal control officer. Councilmember Dawson commented there may be circumstances where residents would not involve Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 7 Packet Page 194 of 202 animal control such as trapping feral cats. She questioned under what circumstances animal control would be involved. Councilmember Plunkett suggested via a complaint. Councilmember Orvis expressed support for the motion to ensure there were regulations requiring the humane treatment of a trapped animal. Councilmember Dawson commented if/when animal control would be authorized to set a trap on private property was a separate issue. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE DIRECTION TO THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DEVELOP LANGUAGE CLARIFYING THAT ANIMAL CONTROL COULD, UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE DETERMINED, BE CALLED OUT TO EFFECTUATE TRAPPING OF A CAT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Haakenson suggested any further revisions be discussed by the full Council and not by Council Committee. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ray Martin, Edmonds, read a letter to the editor he submitted to the Everett Herald that had not been enovation of published regarding the decision on the renovation of Old Milltown. He cited the fine job the Council Old Milltown P g g was doing individually and collectively, citing individual Councilmember accomplishments. He opined the Council made a correct decision with regard to Old Milltown and doubted the developer, Mr. Gregg, would win his appeal in Superior Court. With regard to the previous item, he suggested a resident who felt a cat was a nuisance in their yard, first talk to the owner and if they did not respond appropriately, have the animal control officer contact the owner to discuss options. Old Woodway Colin Southcote-Want, Edmonds, referred to his January 18 request for public records for documents Elementary school site pertaining to the termination of the Sherwood Park Interlocal Agreement, the agreement that guaranteed access to the Old Woodway Elementary School playfields through June 2009. As nothing could be found in the City's records regarding termination, the City Clerk's office contacted Snohomish County who provided a copy of the document terminating the agreement. He noted Mayor Haakenson and the Edmonds School District Superintendent signed the agreement on November 16, 2006 and Snohomish County signed the agreement on December 18, 2006. He posed the following questions: Did the Mayor have the power to sign an agreement giving up access, did it amount to a free gift of public funds to a private developer, did the Council vote to give the Mayor authority to sign the termination agreement, as this was a de facto abandonment of a park was it considered by the Planning Board or a public hearing held and a vote taken, and did the Edmonds School District Superintendent have the authority to sign the agreement after the Edmonds School District sold the property. He cited the value of 2'/z years of access to 5 %2 acres of land. He requested a response to these questions. Strom Peterson, Edmonds, resident and local business owner, explained it was the people of Edmonds who made every day an Edmonds kind of day. He commented the City Council had a responsibility to these citizens, to protect the City's resources and uphold the laws, a pledge many feel the Council had not upheld and he planned to become involved. Mayor Haakenson interrupted, advising speakers were not allowed to campaign from the podium. Mr. Peterson advised there may be interesting information in the upcoming editions of the local newspaper. He thanked the Council, Mayor and staff for their work and looked forward to working with them in the future. Mayor Haakenson referred to the statement on the back of the agenda regarding audience participation that states in accordance with RCW 42.17.130, the Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 8 Packet Page 195 of 202 opportunity for public comment shall not include comments that promote or oppose candidates for public office. Ordinances re: Al Rutledge, Edmonds, recalled similar discussions regarding animals in the 1990s and commented that Animals he believes the ordinances dealing with animals need to be revised. He commented on the neighborhood eighborhood park issue and stated he is involved and is keeping an eye on how this issue is going. Next, he discussed Park Term Limits for the issue of term limits related to the Mayor's position. He is not aware of action taken regarding term a or limits and requested information in writing. os Meeting Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented as a former Councilmember, he learned those who worked for Regarding old the City protected the City; the Planning Board and ADB were in a similar situation. He commented it Milltown was unfortunate that the City was being sued because of a decision made by the City Council and ADB on Mr. Gregg's first proposal to the ADB for Old Milltown. He suggested the Council review the minutes of the last ADB meeting where Mr. Gregg made a second proposal regarding Old Milltown. He commended the ADB on their review of Mr. Gregg's second proposal and their consideration of public comment, pointing out this was not done with the first proposal. He noted at the first meeting the Board did not adequately consider how the proposal met the design guidelines or consider public comment. He expressed concern with ADB Chair Utt's conduct at the meeting where Mr. Gregg made his first proposal as well as the meeting where he made his second proposal. He requested the Council review the minutes and consider dismissing Mr. Utt with cause. Proposed Robert McCallum, Edmonds, provided photographs of two traps used by most humane societies and Ordinance re: animal control agencies. He referred to the ordinance that stated although not prohibited from roaming at Animals large and not thereby ranted an special rights or privileges, cats permitted to roam b their owners were Roaming at g Y g Y p g p g� p Y Large liable for trespassing even if no damage is caused. He recalled making four attempts over the course of a year to approach the neighbors who owned the cat and finding they were unwilling to reach a compromise. He explained they used a humane trap and there was never any intent to hurt the cat. 7. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS Community/ Community/Development Services Committee Development Services Councilmember Marin reported staff presented the 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program. Following Committee discussion, the Committee endorsed the proposed CIP for a presentation at a public hearing before the full Council. Staff then provided a LIDAR map of the earth subsidence landslide hazard area of North Edmonds which was also forwarded for a public hearing before the full Council. Next, the Committee discussed Shell Valley emergency access. It was recommended this project be included in the 2007-2013 CIP and the 2007-2008 capital budget with design in 2007 using the $50,000 budgeted for right-of-way stabilization, construction in 2009, and with an option to construct in 2008 if funding could be appropriated. The final item the Committee discussed was the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation on design guidelines for downtown; no action was taken and a presentation will be made to the Council next week. finance Finance Committee committee Councilmember Wambolt reported staff reviewed the fourth quarter budget report, advising increased revenue and decreased expenditures increased the ending balance by $720,000. Sales tax revenue exceeded projections by $320,000; the three main contributors to sales tax revenue are motor vehicle sales (30%), constructionibuilding (10%) and food/beverage sales (10%). He advised although 2006 ended strong, the City still needed to identify other sources of revenue. He reported at a recent meeting in Olympia the Speaker of the House assured streamlined sales tax would be approved by the legislature this year. The Committee then discussed the 2007 bond sale; a rating conference call was held on February Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 9 Packet Page 196 of 202 17 and the bond sale will be held on February 27. The final item discussed was potentially making EMS a standalone cost center rather than including it in the Fire Department budget. ublic safety Public Safety Committee Committee Councilmember Dawson reported the Committee discussed graffiti in the City and the possibility of an anti -graffiti ordinance. She advised graffiti was currently prosecuted under the malicious mischief provisions of the code. The committee discussed potentially criminalizing possession of graffiti implements and formalizing the abatement procedures in the code. She will provide a model ordinance to the committee next month and then the matter will be forwarded to the full Council for discussion of a range of options. She invited the business community to provide input regarding criminalizing possession of graffiti implements. The Committee also reviewed the 2007 addendum to the Prisoner Detention Agreement with the City of Lynnwood which was approved on tonight Consent Agenda. 8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor's Mayor Haakenson invited the public to the neighborhood meeting at Seaview Elementary on February 22 eighborhood Meeting at 7:00 p.m. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS AWC Council President Olson reported on the Association of Washington Cities conference and the Snohomish conference Cities and Towns legislative dinner where several legislators described bills they were sponsoring. Building In response to an email from Dave Page asking Councilmembers to clarify their position on building Heights heights, Councilmember Wambolt advised when he ran for election he opposed tall buildings in the downtown area, specifically the area now identified as the BD 1 zone — 5th from Main to Maple and Main between 3rd and 6th. He supported taller buildings in other areas to meet the City's growth targets and for economic reasons which was why he voted for taller buildings in Firdale Village, Five Corners, Hwy. 99 and the Edmonds Way Corridor. wilding Councilmember Moore advised she supported the Planning Board's first proposal regarding building eights heights. Now that the building heights issue had been decided, it was appropriate to move forward with consideration of other neighborhood centers to give the residents what they needed and deserved for neighborhood village development. Old Woodway Councilmember Moore reiterated her disagreement with the Council's decision not to preserve the 11 School lementSite y acres in south Edmonds known as the old Woodway Elementary School site. She forwarded the questions posed by Mr. Southcote-Want to Mayor Haakenson and requested he direct staff to answer the questions. Mayor Haakenson advised he would. Legal Fees With regard to legal fees, Councilmember Moore explained Mr. Snyder was not opposed to the Council discussing legal fees. She felt it was her responsibility as a Councilmember to ask questions; if the City's legal fees were increasing, consideration may need to be given to whether it would be appropriate to have a staff attorney. She concluded while consideration was given to developing neighborhood centers and developing new revenue sources, it was also appropriate to look at how funds were spent. For Councilmember Moore, Mr. Snyder explained the Ogden Murphy Wallace bills was broken out into specific litigation, Mayor/Council authorized projects, and by department. He advised there were detailed billings submitted that were available for the Council's review. Councilmember Moore pointed out it was important for the Council and citizens to know the cost of actions taken by the Council as well as by citizens. She noted some citizens cost the City a great deal in legal fees. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 10 Packet Page 197 of 202 Councilmember Moore thanked Council President Olson for ending the Council meetings much earlier in 2007, acknowledging it may be the subject matters that facilitate shorter meetings. orkforce Councilmember Dawson reported on this morning's State of the County address by Executive Reardon Development and invited the public to access the address on the County's website. One of the issues Executive Reardon talked about was workforce development, an issue she is involved with at Snohomish County including working with the Workforce Development Council. Two members of the Workforce Development Council and she will be in Washington, DC Friday through Wednesday working on workforce development. She regretted missing the February 27 joint meeting with the Historic Preservation Commission. 10. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes February 20, 2007 Page 11 Packet Page 198 of 202 10523 240th PI.S.W. Edmonds, WA March 1 2007 To Mayor Haakenson and the. Edmonds City Council: RECEM a. EDMONDS CITl COU L .In regards to the current cat trapping discussions, you should be aware of our experience in Forest Glen prior to our annexation to Edmonds. Not wanting any cats in her yard, this neighbor would set a trap with an open can of tuna on a daily basis. Then her captives would-be transported to the local Everett Humane organization. She did not care that her neighbors (adults and children) were upset. Finally a meeting. was held at the. old Woodway High School with a representative of . Snohomish County animal control. With at least twenty-five adults and the cat trapper in attendance, it reached near riot proportions. The lady moved away. We love our cats and they do become an. extension of our families just as any dog Would.. A. trapped or missing cat brings fear of. our resident. coyotes. Please protect our cats as.you consider ordinance and /or law changes. Sincerely, Janet Robertson (206) 546-5578 Packet Page 199 of 202 VUGET SOUND GASTROENTEROLOGY February 23, 2007 Mayor Gary Haakenson City Hall, Third Floor 121 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mayor Haakenson: RECEIVED FEB 2.8 2007 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR ® Ty, azTn;irz3aJ 0 *40UNCIL c• C'i�.jo CI7y cp(,,,* I have been in practice in Edmonds since 1979. My wife and I moved to 715 Hanna Park Road in Edmonds in 1988, and have lived there ever since. We regularly have cats trespassing on our property. They kill birds. They dig up plants. They leave unpleasant surprises for us to find while gardening. We are tired of having to put up with these cats. We believe that not only should the City allow cat trapping, but that it is time for the City to go further and enact a cat leash law. This leash law would not only prevent domestic cats from trespassing, killing wildlife, and damaging private property, but would also make it much easier for animal control to identify, trap, and rid our community of ferrel cats, which kill wildlife, as well assmaller domestic animals including domestic cats. Many other communities have enacted such laws Edmonds -to enact one. Sinc e , Robt rt G. Chaffee, M. RC:neh My wife and I believe it is time for Packet Page 200 of 202 Page 1 of 1 Spellman, Jana From: Don and Marcia Patience [houseofpatience@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:27 PM To: Spellman, Jana Cc: houseofpatience@comcast.net Subject: NO to TRAPPING OF PETS We are long time neighbors of Ray and Marge Martin whose cat was intentionally caught in a trap. Although we do not have any pets, we are happy to see all the neighborhood cats visit our property because they keep the rodent population down. We live in a fairly wooded area and these pesky mice and rats are indeed around. WE DEFINITELY ARE AGAINST TRAPPING PETS. The only justification I can think of would be if the Animal Control made that decision and that department did the trapping. Don and Marcia Patience 3/12/2007 Packet Page 201 of 202 Message Page 1 of 1 Spellman, Jana Subject: FW: Cats DISTRIBUTED TO CITY COUNCIL -----Original Message ----- From: dick floyd [mailto:dcfloyd_2000@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 2:09 PM To: daveandmartha.orvis@verison.net Cc: Spellman, Jana Subject: Cats There are many good reasons dogs are not allowed to run loose in our neighborhoods. There are an equal number of very good reasons cats shouldn't be allowed to, also. The most significant one from my point of view is that they are nasty critters that bury their poop indiscriminately. My wife and I enjoy getting our hands dirty in the garden, but after running into cat feces any number of times we now resort to wearing rubber gloves. My vote is to keep the cats under control and out of our yards. Thanks, Dick Floyd 23221 81 st PI W Edmonds (425) 672-0273 Don't get soaked. Take a-cluick peek at the forecast with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut. 3/22/200t Page 202 of 202