HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007.04.17 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds
6:45 p.m. - Interview Candidates for the Architectural Design Board
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1.Approval of Agenda
2.Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B.AM-932
Approval of City Council Retreat Minutes of March 23-24, 2007.
C.AM-933
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of April 3, 2007.
D.AM-928
Approval of claim checks #95345 through #95507 for April 5, 2007 in the amount of $377,063.39 and #95508
through #95682 for April 12, 2007 in the amount of $441,911.82. Approval of payroll direct deposit and
checks #44670 through #44724 for the period of March 16 through March 31, 2007 in the amount of
$817,018.64.
E.AM-927
Proclamation in honor of Faith Community Church - 50th Anniversary, April 15, 2007.
F.AM-930
Authorization to call for bids for the Friar Tuck Lane Drainage Improvements Project.
G.AM-931
Authorization to call for bids for the 100th Avenue West Right-of-Way Stabilization Project.
H.AM-942
Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Reid Middleton, Inc. for the Caspers,
Ninth Avenue and Puget Drive Walkway Project.
I.AM-939
2007 First Quarter Budget Amendment.
3.AM-936
(5 Min)
Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of Bruce O'Neill and Steve Bullock to the Architectural Design
Board.
4.AM-938
(5 Min)
Proclamation in honor of Earth Week in Edmonds, April 14-22, 2007.
5.AM-935
(15 Min)
Proposed Ordinance adopting a Six-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the years
2007 through 2013.
6.AM-940
(15 Min)
Closed Record Review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone from
Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business (BC). The site is located at 24310 76th Ave. W.
Applicant: A.D. Shapiro Architects for Ron Knowles. File No. R-2005-97.
7.AM-941 Closed Record Review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone from Multiple
Packet Page 1 of 396
7.AM-941
(45 Min)
Closed Record Review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone from Multiple
Residential (RM-1.5) to Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way (RM-EW), and from Community Business
(BC) to Community Business - Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The site is located at 23012, 23014, 23028,
23100, 23110 Edmonds Way, 9133 232nd St. SW, and the vacant lot at the northwest corner of 232nd St.
SW & Edmonds Way. Applicant: A.D. Shapiro for SGA Corp. File No. R-2006-95.
8.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)
9.AM-937
(30 Min)
Discussion of proposed ordinance amending provisions of City Code Chapter 5.05 relating to Animal
Control. Discussion will include deleting cats from the exemption of roaming at large as well as
requiring licensing of cats. (Requested by Councilmember Moore.)
10.AM-944
(15 Min)
Proposed Ordinance establishing a period in which to prepare an application and forms of decision.
11.AM-934
(15 Min)
Approval of Non-Represented Compensation (NRC) Policy.
12.AM-943
(15 Min)
Report on City Council Committee Meetings.
13.(5 Min)Mayor's Comments
14.(15 Min)Council Comments
15.Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 396
AM-932 2.B.
Approval of Retreat Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Retreat Minutes of March 23-24, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft Retreat Minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Draft Retreat Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/11/2007 04:39 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 09:25 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 04/11/2007 04:37
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 3 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
MARCH 23 – 24, 2006
The Edmonds City Council retreat was called to order at 9:10 a.m. at the Country Inn in La Conner,
Washington.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Friday, March 23
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember (arrived 2:46 p.m..)
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Saturday March 24
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Friday March 23 & Saturday March 24
Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief
David Stern, Chief of Police
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Kathleen Junglov, Asst. Admin. Services Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Debi Humann, Human Resources Manager
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Linda Carl, Senior Executive Assistant
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
PUBLIC PRESENT
Friday, March 23 & Saturday, March 24
None
WORK SESSION WITH CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY COUNCIL
Executive Sessions
City Attorney Scott Snyder was present for this discussion. Councilmembers reviewed a draft with
amendments to the Council Rules of Procedure regarding Executive Sessions. Discussion followed
regarding topics appropriate for Executive Session, ability for a majority of the Council to determine
whether to make an issue/topic public or remain in Executive Session, relevant State statutes, the
Council’s practice of keeping minutes of Executive Session to maintain record of consensus, mechanics
of notice, and reaching consensus in Executive Session what would be discussed in open session.
It was agreed Executive Session information would not be released absent a consensus in Executive
Session regarding information to be made public.
Request for Public Records
Council discussed the cost of requests for public records and the City’s obligation to provide public
records. Mr. Snyder suggested periodic training for each department by Ogden Murphy Wallace;
Packet Page 4 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 2
advising City Clerk Sandy Chase was scheduling a training session. Discussion followed regarding
difficulty determining what records the public wanted and assistance that would be provided via an
electronic index of all records. Suggestions included having a presentation at Council to educate the
public regarding how to request records and the cost, requiring plans be electronically submitted so that
they were easily reproducible, and establishing a committee to discuss rules and procedures and possibly
adopting the Attorney General’s model rules. It was agreed the Finance Committee would discuss rules
and procedures for public records requests and possibly adopting the Attorney General’s model rules.
Council/Mayor/Staff/Attorney Roles
Mr. Snyder reviewed the roles of the Council, Mayor, Staff and City Attorney. He suggested establishing
rules for Council committees and the duties of the Council President and how those duties were carried
out. He also recommended when the public makes a request, the Council make a motion or refer the
matter to committee. Discussion followed regarding who has the ability to terminate the City Attorney,
when Council could hire its own counsel, administrative issues versus policy issues, how issues were
placed on committee agendas, the purpose of committees if all topics are forwarded to the Council,
examples of when the committee structure worked well, and other Councils that hold committee-of-the-
whole meetings on committee night.
Suggestions included scheduling agenda items so that the City Attorney was not required to attend every
meeting, redirecting citizens’ energy into process, involving the public to avoid adversary roles, and
holding committee-of-the-whole meetings rather than committee meetings.
Boards and Commissions
Councilmembers discussed whether the Council should make appointments versus the Council
confirming the Mayor’s appointments. Following a brief discussion, Councilmembers agreed to discuss
this topic further tomorrow.
Miscellaneous
Councilmember Plunkett raised the issue of the method by which Councilmembers were recognized to
speak at Council meetings, suggesting the Council returning to the practice of Councilmembers raising
their hand to be recognized versus calling out. Mr. Snyder pointed out the rule was that each
Councilmember had an opportunity to speak before a member was recognized for a second time which
was intended to avoid a back-and-forth commentary between Councilmembers. He advised some cities
use a light panel that allows Councilmembers to push a button to be recognized. It was agreed to ask
Mayor Haakenson to return to policy of recognizing Councilmembers via raised hands.
Suggestions included that the Council and Mayor do a better job of avoiding back and forth commentary,
not beginning debate until a motion was on the floor, having the Mayor invite comments from
Councilmembers in a left to right sequence with the Mayor speaking in that order as well, possibly
seating the Mayor at one end of the dais so that he can see the Council better, and if a topic is a
Councilmember’s issue, they be given deference to make the motion. Mr. Snyder advised of his plans to
develop clearer guidelines for quasi judicial proceedings. Council President Olson agreed to work with
Ms. Spellman on a list of procedural changes. A brief discussion followed regarding the order in which
Audience Comments appears on the agenda; no change to the current policy of scheduling Audience
Comments after public hearings was recommended.
Mayor Haakenson and Staff joined the Council at 11:20 a.m.
Discussion with Mayor Haakenson and Council
Mayor Haakenson explained he requested staff structure the retreat around the City’s financial situation.
He advised another issue that would not be addressed today but had the potential to be expensive was the
Packet Page 5 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 3
extensive backlog in City building maintenance projects. He suggested the Council consider, 1) a budget
adjustment at end of year to replenish the fund, or 2) adding $100,000 from the sale of the property
associated with Angler’s Crossing to the fund.
Mayor Haakenson distributed a summary of the work to date by the Citizens Committee on U.S. Mayors
Climate Protection Agreement. Public Works Director Noel Miller and he commented on current City
practices to reduce energy use and promote energy reductions. Mayor Haakenson also included a
newspaper article entitled, “Effects of Climate Change.” He supported the formation of a subcommittee
to discuss incorporating green building codes into City codes, suggesting a Councilmember serve on that
committee along with staff and builders.
Next Mayor Haakenson raised the issue of creating a parking space for a hybrid plug-in in the Public
Safety parking lot. He offered to have staff investigate the cost to provide electricity to a parking space as
well as a fee for the service (to avoid a potential gift of public funds) if the Council was interested in
pursuing this issue. Discussion followed regarding the current inability to commercially purchase plug-in
vehicles, approximately 30 currently licensed in Washington, providing signage that the parking space
was available for that use but not prohibiting other parking, what other types of vehicles could use the
plug-in, and the potential marketing opportunity the availability of the plug-in would provide.
Councilmembers expressed a desire for further information regarding what type of other vehicles could
use the plug-in. It was agreed staff would bring further information to the Council at a work meeting
regarding providing a plug in for electric vehicles.
Mayor Haakenson advised Human Resources Manager Debi Humann investigated a medical insurance
plan available through AWC that would save the City money, a portion of which could be offered to
unions via a post-retirement health savings plans. The plan was described to union leaders and staff
offered to have AWC make a presentation on the plan; their initial reaction was three of four unions were
not interested and one thought they would be losing something. The unions have until Monday to advise
whether they want staff to pursue the plan with AWC. If the unions were not interested, Ms. Humann
will not pursue it. Therefore, the agenda item regarding medical coverage would not be discussed further
today. He advised staff may pursue this plan in the future for non-represented employees to determine if
there were significant savings and offer it to the unions again in the future.
Mayor Haakenson advised the State’s capital budget includes $500,000 for the purchase of the former
Woodway Elementary School property and $100,000 for the Shell Creek property. It was suggested 2-3
Councilmembers call Senators Paull Shin and Darlene Fairley today to urge their support.
1. SESSION OVERVIEW AND GOALS
a) Increase Understanding of Edmonds Current Financial Position
Administrative Services Director Dan Clements provided a PowerPoint presentation entitled “Positioning
for Our Financial Future.” He reviewed the City’s current financial situation including Moody’s A1
Bond Rating, General Fund reserves that include a General Fund balance of $4.2 million as of December
31, 2006 and an emergency reserve balance of $2 million. He reviewed efficiencies and best business
practices that include Council e-agendas, staff training and continuing education, purchase cards for
acquisition, expanded City Hall hours, biennial budget, on-line credit card payment, financial system
overhaul, new phone system, new permitting system and new business licensing system. He described
funds provided in 2001 via the Sno-Isle annexation; expenditure cuts of $1,248,000 in 2003; Street
Transfer reductions in 2006, 2007 and 2008; and revenue increases that included an EMS levy in 2003;
use of banked capacity in 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007; Olympic View Water franchise in 2004; LID
Packet Page 6 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 4
Guarantee in 2004, 2005, and 2007; utility tax increases in 2003, 2007 and 2008; and possibly sales tax
sourcing in 2007. Council requested staff provide the amount of savings provided via Council e-agendas.
b) Describe Edmonds Future Financial Position
Mr. Clements reviewed a chart illustrating revenue growth 2002-2008. He displayed a projection for
years 2007 – 2012 with and without a 2007 EMS levy.
During and following Mr. Clements’ presentation, discussion ensued regarding projections for sales tax
sourcing, concern with the 2009-2010 budget, inclusion of the EMS levy in the 2007 budget, and impact
on the budget if an EMS levy was not pursued. Next, Mr. Clements described budget drivers, reviewing
the rate of increase in property tax (2%), sales tax (5%) and utility tax (3.5%) versus the rate of increase
in labor (6%), fleet (6.1%) and construction (10%) versus CPI (4.1%).
c) Discuss Strategies for Managing the City’s Future Finances
Mr. Clements explained strategies for managing the City’s financial future include revenue strategies,
efficiency strategies, reduction strategies and compensation strategies. He advised revenue strategies
were grouped into three major categories, those requiring Council approval, those requiring voter
approval and those requiring State legislative approval. He advised the Council would participate in an
exercise later to identify revenue strategies and reduction strategies they were interested in staff gathering
additional information and strategies they were not interested in pursuing.
d) Council Sign-Off on Policies to Address Edmonds Financial Future
i) Revenue Policies
ii) Efficiency Policies
iii) Budget Reduction Policies
iv) Compensation Policies
2) Edmonds Present Financial Position
a) Overview of Current Financial Position
b) Positives, Negatives, and Exposures
c) Primary Budget Drivers
d) General Fund Projection Model
3. Positioning Edmonds for Its Financial Future
a) Revenue Options
Assistant Administrative Services Director Kathleen Junglov and Mr. Clements reviewed the following
revenue options that required Council approval, an estimate of the revenue each would provide in 2008-
2011 and pros and cons of each:
• B & O Tax (0.2% Maximum)
Packet Page 7 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 5
• Cable TV utility tax to 6%
• Gambling tax
• Water, Sewer, Storm Utility Tax to 7%
• Reduce Cemetery Subsidy – Police Chief Stern was asked to research the rate and billing of aid
provided to DUI stop
• Broadband Initiative
• Emergency Reserve
Ms. Junglov and Mr. Clements reviewed the following revenue options that required voter approval, an
estimate of the revenue each would provide in 2008-2011, and pros and cons of each:
• General Property Levy Lid Lift
• EMS Levy
• Transportation Benefit District
Mr. Clements reviewed the following revenue options that required State Legislature approval and an
estimate of the revenue each would provide in 2008-2011:
• Ferry Traffic Mitigation – it was suggested Mr. Doubleday be asked how this could most
effectively be pursued.
• REET for Transportation
Ms. Junglov reviewed the following additional revenue options and pros and cons of each:
• Sale of surplus property
• Traffic light cameras
• Seattle Internet charges – Mr. Clifton advised of staff’s plans to research the case that Seattle won
recently that would allow them to impose a utility tax on the internet.
• Annexation of a portion of Esperance
i) 2007 EMS Levy (Tom)
Mr. Clements advised the current budget calls for approval of a 2007 EMS levy which would become
effective in 2008.
Fire Chief Tom Tomberg described funds provided via an EMS levy ($1.2 million), explaining it would
maintain existing service levels, balance the 2008 budget and address unmet Fire needs. The EMS levy
would increase the levy from 0.36124 to 0.5 per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. He explained the
rate decreases annually due to tax limitations and as the rate falls, the General Fund subsidy increases.
The impact on a $500,000 home would be $5.83/month or $70 annually. He advised if the levy failed, it
would return to the existing rate. He reviewed the timeline for placing the levy on the primary election
ballot and the cost of an election.
Discussion followed regarding concern with the timing of the EMS levy and the tight timeline for a 2007
vote, time necessary to educate the public regarding a transport fee, and the potential impact the EMS
levy could have on the Sound Transit/RTID transportation package that includes funding for Edmonds
Crossing.
It was the consensus of the Council to delay an EMS levy until 2008
ii) City & Levy
b) Efficiency Reductions
c) Efficiency & Reduction Options
Packet Page 8 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 6
Mr. Clements reviewed the following efficiency options:
• Public records request: automation
• Internet payment extended to all operations
• Eliminate paper/paper forms where possible
• Reassigning staff based on current needs
• City medical coverage and options
• City bargaining and compensation policies
(Councilmember Marin arrived at 2:46 p.m.)
Ms. Humann described the following labor cost efficiency options
• Alternatives for medical plan coverage
• Compensation and bargaining policies
A brief discussion regarding negotiation strategies followed.
Ms. Humann reviewed the existing L5 non-represented employee compensation plan including inequities,
difficulty finding comparables for approximately half the non-represented positions, represented
employees’ compensation often exceed their non-represented supervisors, lack of any internal
comparison, and time intensive for HR staff. She recalled an alternate compensation plan, the NRC plan,
was presented to the Council in August 2006. The Council made a decision to retain the existing plan; all
non-represented employees received a 3% COLA and a merit pool was established in the 2007-2008
budget. She suggested the Council consider the following alternatives, 1) look at the NRC and identify
weakness and develop alternative strategies, 2) look at the existing L5 and identify weakness and develop
alternate strategies or 3) develop an independent compensation plan. Discussion followed regarding
concerns with the existing L5 plan and the proposed NRC plan, pros and cons of a salary survey, merit
pay dependent on department/independent goals, loss of key employees, difficulty replacing employees
due to the salary structure, difficulties finding comparables, lower staffing levels in Edmonds, and non-
represented employees’ satisfaction with the NRC plan.
It was the consensus of the Council to have staff bring the NRC policy back to Council for review.
i) Best Practice Initiatives: General Operations, Medical Coverage (Debi),
Bargaining & Compensation
ii) Budget Reductions
During a break, the Council participated in the exercise indicating their preferences with regard to
revenue sources, EMS levy, and budget reduction measures.
Mr. Clements reviewed the following budget reduction strategies:
• $500,000 equals 1.5% of General Fund
• Possible approaches
o Across the board 1.5% reductions
o Elimination of programs or services
o Reduction of overhead costs
The first day of the retreat concluded at 4:20 p.m.
Packet Page 9 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 7
d) Council Policy Decisions
i) Revenue
ii) Efficiency
iii) Reductions
iv) Compensation
4. Up-Date Strategic Plan to Reflect Council Changes
a) Review Proposed Changes
b) Council Approval of 2007-08 Plan
SATURDAY, MARCH 24
The second day of the retreat was called to order at 9:00 a.m.
Mr. Clements reviewed the Council’s preferences with regard to 2007 revenue options, future revenue
options and future reduction options and advised staff would bring back a priority on revenue options and
reduction options as a work plan (blue = interested in pursuing, black = not interested in pursuing):
Item Blue Black Enactment
Move EMS Levy to Fall 2008 5 0 Council
Future Revenue Options
Item Blue Black Enactment
Reduce Cemetery Subsidy 7 0 Council
Sale of Surplus Property 7 0 Council
Cable TV Utility Tax to 6% 6 0 Council
“Seattle” Internet Charges 6 0 Council
Highway 99 Petition Annexation 6 0 Council
EMS Property Tax Levy Lid Lift 5 0 Vote
Transportation Benefit District 5 0 State
Electric Utility Tax Increase to 7% 5 2 Vote
Natural Gas Utility Tax Increase to 7% 5 2 Vote
Telephone Utility Tax Increase to 7% 5 2 Vote
Solid Waste Utility Tax Increase to 7% 5 2 Vote
Water Utility Tax Increase to 7% 4 1 Council
Sewer Utility Tax Increase to 7% 4 1 Council
Storm Utility Tax Increase to 7% 4 1 Council
Emergency Transport Fee at $450 4 1 Council
Sales Tax Economic Development 4 0 Council
Traffic Light Cameras 3 2 Council
Edmonds Dance with the Stars 2 3 Council
Gambling Tax 6 Council
General Property Tax Levy Lid Lift 1 5 Vote
Packet Page 10 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 8
B&O Tax (0.2% Maximum) 0 6 Council
Emergency Reserve Fund ($2.0
million)
Council
Ferry Traffic Mitigation State
REET for Transportation State
Future Reduction Options
Item Blue Black Enactment
Elimination of Programs or Services 6 0 Council
Reduction of Overhead Costs 5 1 Council
Across the Board Reductions 0 5 Council
The Council also expressed interest in pursuing ferry mitigation.
With regard to Audience Comments on upcoming ballot issues, Mr. Snyder advised public comments
were an opportunity for the public to address the Council, not an opportunity to use the camera. He
suggested the Council establish a “bright line” with regard to public comment on ballot issues and
candidacies, to allow the public to speak about things the Council respond to but not things Council could
not respond to. He clarified residents/Council could continue to advocate for/against the Edmonds
Crossing project but not for/against RTID.
Staff left at 9:10 a.m.
Planning Board and ADB Future Agendas
Council President Olson distributed the Planning Board’s extended agenda. Suggestions included
publishing the Planning Board’s extended agenda on Channel 21, Council President Olson meet with the
Planning Board Chairman and Planning Manager Rob Chave regarding the Planning Board priorities
including the priority of issues referred by the Council and when pending items will be added to extended
agenda, Council President Olson to obtain an updated flowchart of agenda items from the Planning
Board, and Ms. Spellman to remind Council President Olson of monthly meeting with Planning Board
and ADB Chairs, the Mayor, and Council President.
A brief discussion followed regarding the ADB’s agenda and staff hired to replace Senior Planner Steve
Bullock and Planner Meg Gruwell.
Candidate Debates
Following a brief discussion regarding past debates, it was agreed to establish a policy that the duration of
a debate be limited to approximately two hours, the sponsoring organization pay the cost of the camera
person, the sponsoring organization provide 30 days notice to candidates, and debates be scheduled on a
first come/first served basis. It was suggested Mr. Clifton draft a policy for review by Mr. Snyder and
approval by the Council.
Discussion of Policy Requiring Establishment of New Zones
Discussion ensued regarding a citizen who requested a Comprehensive Plan change who was told to wait
a year for the Comprehensive Plan process versus an applicant who pursued a similar change via another
route and why everyone was not required to go through same process. It was agreed Ms. Spellman would
seek clarification from staff regarding the difference between the two amendments. The Council
requested staff make a presentation at a work session regarding when an applicant would not have to go
through the Comprehensive Plan process. Council expressed a preference for amendments to go through
the Comprehensive Plan process.
Packet Page 11 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 9
Councilmember Moore relayed two instances where people were encouraged by the Mayor to file a claim
against the City, one in regard to emergency tree cutting. Council expressed concern that the definition of
emergency with regard to tree removal was apparently not clear in the City’s ordinance.
Policy Regarding What Constitutes Affordable Housing, Preservation of Trees, etc.
Councilmembers discussed different definitions of “affordable” and developers’ use of the term. It was
suggested a definition be provided for “affordable.” It was agreed to request staff provide a report on
affordable housing including how affordable could apply to development in Edmonds.
Councilmember Olson relayed citizens’ concern with trees cut by PUD in the right-of-way. It was
suggested staff provide the Council tree preservation ordinances from other cities.
Vision – What Does the Council Want Now?
Councilmember Moore recommended the Council establish a vision for what they want Edmonds to look
like in 20 years, a mission for how to get there and set annual goals. Suggestions included using a
facilitator for a strategic planning process, identifying projects to pursue such as the waterfront
redevelopment, delaying a visioning exercise until after the election, scheduling next year’s retreat earlier
in the year and selecting the date now, and scheduling a mid-year mini-retreat.
Councilmember Dawson advised of Snohomish County planning efforts regarding positioning itself as a
destination point for visitors to the 2010 Vancouver Olympics. Suggestions included the Council
discussing how Edmonds could position itself in that effort, relaying the need for additional hotel beds in
2010 to the waterfront redevelopment committee, and considering revisions to Bed and Breakfast
regulations such as parking requirements.
Follow-up on Yesterday
Councilmembers discussed the Mayor providing a State of City address to the Council and the Mayor
submitting an annual work plan for approval by the Council. Council President Olson agreed to ask the
Mayor to prepare and submit a work plan.
With regard to how Councilmembers are recognized during Council discussion, it was agreed to have
staff investigate an inexpensive light system. It was also agreed that if an item was a particular
Councilmember’s issue, they be given deference to make the motion; to request the Mayor identify when
it was appropriate to ask questions, to request a motion, and then open the issue for discussion; the
Council and Mayor make an effort to avoid back and forth debate, and to have the Mayor recognize
Councilmembers via raised hands.
The Council agreed once the public spoke at a public hearing, it was appropriate to ask questions of them.
It was agreed to revise the sign-in sheet to allow the public to sign-in in pro or con on an issue and not
provide testimony.
Councilmember Moore expressed frustration with the committee format, finding that not much was
accomplished and most items were forwarded to the Council. She suggested the Council sit as a
committee-of-the-whole on committee night. Following discussion, it was agreed items would not be
scheduled on the Consent Agenda until the week after the Councilmember gave the Committee report
unless the item was time sensitive. It was suggested Councilmembers invite Council President Olson to
attend a Committee meeting if there was a controversial item on the agenda.
With regard to Councilmember Moore’s suggestion to schedule a New Business/Ideas item on the
Council agenda, Council President Olson suggested adding New Business/Ideas as an agenda item on the
Council’s work session agenda.
Packet Page 12 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 23-24, 2007
Page 10
Resolution for a 4-Year University
Councilmember Moore advised negotiations were ongoing and recommended waiting to see what
happened before passing a resolution.
Boards/Commissions
Council President Olson advised some boards/commissions had terms limits and others did not and on
some the Councilmember was the liaison and on others the Councilmember was Chair. Discussion
followed regarding the process for interviewing Directors, the Hearing Examiner, etc. via a subcommittee
of the Council; concern that the Mayor appoints staff as well as boards/commission members; and
concern that the Council rubber-stamps the Mayor’s appointments to boards/commissions.
It was the consensus of the Council that they wanted more involvement upfront in the interview process
of Planning Board and ADB members including the Council providing a recommendation to the Mayor.
It was agreed to develop a list of interview questions for the Council to ask and to determine from Mr.
Snyder what the Council was allowed to do including whether the Council could conduct
Board/Commission interviews/selection in Executive Session. It was also suggested the requirements for
the ADB landscape architect be loosened to include a landscape designer.
Councilmember Dawson suggested each Councilmember appoint a Planning Board member such as was
done in Snohomish County so that Planning Boardmembers represented each district. She noted this
would create greater diversity and involve more citizens. It was agreed to ask Mr. Snyder whether that
could be done.
Basis for Removal of Boardmembers/Commissioners
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the Council was comfortable with a boardmember/commissioner
being an advocate outside of their role as boardmember/commissioner that gave the appearance he/she
was not serving in their role as a boardmember/commissioner. Councilmembers recognized the
importance of training for boardmembers/commissioners. It was agreed to require training for all
boardmembers/commissions and AWC training for Planning Board and ADB members.
Councilmembers acknowledged if a boardmember/commissioner’s reappointment was scheduled on the
Consent Agenda, a Councilmember could request the Council President pull it for discussion.
It was agreed to have Mr. Snyder make the removal provisions the same for all boards/commissions such
as attendance requirements, violation of the Appearance of Fairness Act, ex-parte communications, pre-
judgmental bias, financial interest, etc.
ADJOURNMENT
The retreat was adjourned at 11:30 a.m.
Packet Page 13 of 396
AM-933 2.C.
Approval of April 3, 2007 Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of April 3, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Draft Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/11/2007 04:57 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 09:26 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 04/11/2007 04:56
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 14 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
April 3, 2007
Following a Special Meeting at 6:15 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding legal matters, the Edmonds
City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers,
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Shaun Callahan, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Haakenson added introduction of the Student Representative as Agenda Item 3A and renumbered
Item 3 as Item 3B.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 27, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #95184 THROUGH #95342 FOR MARCH 29, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $202,530.81.
D. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE 92ND AVENUE WEST/234TH
STREET SW INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND COUNCIL
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT.
Packet Page 15 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 2
E. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY SENIOR
CENTER ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF
PROJECT.
F. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY SENIOR
CENTER FIRE ALARM RENOVATION PROJECT AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF
PROJECT.
G. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH EDMONDS-SOUTH
SNOHOMISH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE EDMONDS MARKET.
H. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES MURPHY AUCTIONEERS TO
SELL SURPLUS EQUIPMENT.
I. APPROVAL OF GENERIC INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING RECIPROCAL
SERVICES FOR CODE-ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND BUILDING OFFICIALS.
J. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE, APRIL 15 - 22, 2007.
K. ORDINANCE NO. 3635 REGARDING STREET SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPE
STANDARDS IN THE CG AND CG-2 ZONE: AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REPEAL CHAPTER 16.60
RELATING TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONES.
3A. INTRODUCTION OF STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE
Council President Olson introduced Shaun Callahan, a student at Edmonds-Woodway High School, and
described his interests and activities.
Student Representative Callahan thanked mentors who have assisted him including his grandfather
George Walsh, and coaches Pat White and John Gradwohl.
3B. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATOR'S WEEK, APRIL 8 -
14, 2007.
Councilmember Dawson, SnoCom Chair, read a proclamation declaring April 8 – 14, 2007 as
Telecommunicator’s Week in Edmonds and urging citizens to show their appreciation to public safety
communications and support staff. She presented the proclamation to SnoCom Director Steve Perry and
SnoCom Dispatcher Association President John Chandler.
Mr. Perry thanked the Council for the proclamation on behalf of SnoCom and its staff. In response to a
frequently asked question why SnoCom is so successful, he explained it was due to the excellent, high
quality staff and their partnership with user agencies such as Edmonds. He noted the relationship
between SnoCom and the Edmonds Police and Fire Departments was an excellent example.
Councilmember Dawson added SnoCom’s success was also due to the excellent leadership Mr. Perry
provided.
4. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH WEEK, APRIL 2 - 8, 2007
Councilmember Marin read a proclamation declaring April 2 – 8, 2007 National Public Health Week,
in recognition of the Public Health Department’s efforts to protect the well-being of Edmonds
citizens. He presented the proclamation to Dr. Gary Goldbaum, Snohomish County Health
Officer.
Packet Page 16 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 3
Dr. Goldbaum commented the Public Health Department was able to do such good work due to
the excellent people working in the background. He remarked Public Health was often forgotten
because when things went well, nothing happened. He commented on Public Health’s role in
unleaded gasoline, reduction in TB cases, clean water, and keeping food sources safe. He
commented when the public did hear of something going wrong, Public Health was monitoring
the situation on the public’s behalf to ensure any problems were quickly addressed.
5. PROPOSED RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SUPPORT AND ADOPTION OF THE
INTEGRATED ROADS & TRANSIT PLAN DEVELOPED BY THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT DISTRICT AND SOUND TRANSIT.
Councilmember Marin recommended approval of the resolution, explaining Sound Transit had been
through a long process of making decisions regarding projects to submit to the public for a vote in
November. Sound Transit was currently in a public comment period about the elements to be included in
the package. Both ST2 and RTID contain elements that would be beneficial to Edmonds particularly
related to Edmonds Crossing.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, FOR
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1143 RELATING TO THE SUPPORT AND ADOPTION OF
THE INTEGRATED ROADS & TRANSIT PLAN DEVELOPED BY THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT DISTRICT AND SOUND TRANSIT. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
6. AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE ABATEMENT AND DEMOLITION OF
THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 23700 104TH AVENUE WEST.
City Attorney Scott Snyder referred to the report provided at the Council’s request in response to
questions raised by citizens whether the City had the cart before the horse with regard to demolishing the
school buildings on the old Woodway Elementary School site. He provided the Council copies of the
Purchase and Sale Agreement, available to the public via the City Clerk, which was executed in May
2006 that provided the City a $1 million price break on the property in consideration of the City’s
promise to remove all improvements from all portions of the property by June 30, 2007. He advised the
$1 million price break was consistent with the appraisal which the City and the Edmonds School District
performed.
He explained authorization of a contract was necessary to fulfill the City’s obligation to remove the
buildings and abate the asbestos on the site. He advised there was a $500,000 IAC grant currently in the
State budget; that grant application was based on the purchase of raw land (land after the removal of
structures) for a low impact neighborhood park. This authorization was a necessary step to meet the
City’s obligation in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE ABATEMENT AND DEMOLITION OF
THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 23700 104TH AVENUE WEST.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO
UPDATE THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH NEW DESIGN
GUIDELINES AND A NEW “UP-FRONT” DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS APPLICABLE TO
SPECIFIC DISTRICTS (INITIALLY LIMITED TO DOWNTOWN AND HIGHWAY 99).
Planning Manager Rob Chave recalled the Council held the first public hearing on the new design
guidelines and proposed new process on March 6, 2007. He briefly reviewed the history of this issue,
highlighting the Planning Board recommendation.
Packet Page 17 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 4
Mr. Chave displayed a flowchart and described the old process in which design review occurred near the
end of the developer’s process when typically a great deal of preliminary work and detail had been
completed. He noted there was currently an optional design review process in the existing process
although the process does not specify when it occurred. Under the current process, typically all the
design work was done when the applicant submitted an application and proceeded through the design
review process, resulting in a limited ability for the Architectural Design Board (ADB) to make changes.
Applicants who were familiar with the City’s codes knew what was expected; however, new applicants
have a very little idea of what was expected particularly applicants for small projects.
Under the proposed new process, Mr. Chave explained the design review process occurred almost entirely
at the front of the process. The proposed process is a two-phase public hearing, the first phase would
include discussion by the ADB regarding what criteria would apply and what elements were important to
consider. Following the first phase, the applicant would further their design to address those issues. He
noted the amount of time that would transpire between the first and second phases was dependent on how
quickly the applicant responded. He explained the intent of having design review early in the process was
to involve the applicant before they had settled on a design.
Mr. Chase acknowledged the design presented at phase two of the public hearing would still be more
general than the application for a building permit but would include elevations, a more detailed site plan,
etc. He noted there would generally be enough information to see what the building would look like and
how it related with its surroundings. He summarized design review at the beginning of the process would
be more general, conceptual than has historically been provided for design review. The benefit would be
the larger issues that affect the site would be addressed early in the process. He noted any appeals would
occur after phase two of the public hearing followed by preparation of detailed design leading to a
building permit application. In reviewing the building permit application, staff would ensure the
conditions identified by the ADB for the project were applied. If they were not, the project could
potentially be referred back to the ADB.
Mr. Chave noted one of the changes in City Attorney Scott Snyder’s memo was additional opportunity for
public notice at the building permit stage on an as-requested basis. All parties would be informed during
the earlier design review phase to indicate whether they wanted to be notified when an application for a
building permit came in or the City signed off on the final review. He remarked this was currently done
but would be more formalized via inclusion in the process.
He explained the current 120 day review via Regulatory Reform did not start until an applicant applied
for design review; any pre-application meetings did not count toward the 120 days. Under the proposed
new process, the 120 day time period would begin when an applicant submitted for the phase one public
hearing. He summarized even though the design review would occur earlier in the process, from the
City’s standpoint there would be less time to review some aspects of the project than under the current
process. Therefore staff would need to be very efficient to ensure all the hearings and review fit within
the 120 day period. In response to concerns expressed by citizens that the proposed process would
lengthen the process, in his view it would not lengthen because the preliminary design done by applicants
would be included in the process. He anticipated if an applicant needed additional time prior to the
building permit stage, they could request an extension of the 120 day time period. He summarized only
the City’s time counted toward the 120 days, not the applicant’s time.
Mr. Chave summarized the Planning Board’s recommendation retained the existing design process for
most areas of the City but had a new design process that would be applied area-by-area as design
guidelines/design standards were developed. The first two areas where the new process would apply were
Packet Page 18 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 5
the CG zones on Hwy. 99 and the BD zones downtown. The design review guidelines also formalized
the landscape requirements. He provided a comparison of the current and proposed processes:
Current process New Process
General design review (Section 20.11) District Based (Section. 20.12)
ADB and public input at the end of the process ADB and public input at the beginning of the
process
Guidance from criteria in 20.11.030, Zoning bulk
standards and Comprehensive Plan design
objectives
Guidance from the ADB design guidelines and the
checklist, Zoning bulk standards and applicable
adopted district-based design standards and
applicable Comprehensive Plan design objectives
Mr. Chave referred to Mr. Snyder’s March 29, 2007 memo that described the limited changes made based
on Council and public comments. He identified an additional revision to page 48 of the packet, the ADB
Design Guidelines, regarding screening of dumpsters and utilities, so that the first sentence reads,
“Building sites should locate service elements like trash dumpsters, loading docks and mechanical
equipment away from the street where possible while maintaining their accessibility to the utilities.”
Councilmember Plunkett commented prior to the 120 day period, staff saw the application at the counter
and he assumed the staff person determined everything necessary was included. He asked whether once
that occurred, would staff immediately schedule for ADB review. Mr. Chave answered typically not
because staff would need to ensure not only whether the information was provided but whether additional
information was necessary. He noted it was fairly common that additional site specific information was
required after an applicant submitted an application before staff review could occur.
Councilmember Plunkett asked about staff making a judgment with regard to the design. Mr. Chave
assured it was code-based. He noted staff typically did not make decisions regarding whether the
building was ugly or needed to be designed differently, only code-related elements.
Responding to Councilmember Plunkett, Mr. Chave explained staff’s intent was to ensure when the ADB
reviewed the design, the project on the surface appeared to meet the code. He noted in addition to
landscaping, access was another issue that arose fairly frequently as well as access to utilities.
Councilmember Plunkett concluded staff was attempting to identify obvious issues that needed to be
addressed. Once the application was in order, would staff schedule the first phase of the ADB hearing?
Mr. Chave advised staff would schedule it for the first available meeting that met advertising
requirements. Under the existing process staff would ensure the project met the code and if there was a
problem, contact the applicant to provide them an opportunity for redesign before it was reviewed by the
ADB. Under the new process, the information would be more conceptual, making it less likely that
details would be identified. Councilmember Plunkett concluded it was more likely under the new process
that a design would get to the ADB in a shorter amount of time.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the application could get to the ADB within 30 days in most
cases. Mr. Chave agreed in most cases but he could not guarantee it. For the most part, he anticipated an
application would be reviewed by the ADB within a month.
Councilmember Dawson inquired about the status of design guidelines for other neighborhoods.
Assuming the proposed process was better than the current process, she noted it behooved the Council to
move forward with design guidelines for the other areas of the City. Mr. Chave answered the next logical
areas would be the neighborhood business centers as there had already been some Comprehensive Plan
Packet Page 19 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 6
changes for those areas as well as Westgate. He noted the problem now was staffing as well as time spent
on the Shoreline update and the code rewrite. He hoped the Planning Board could focus on design
guidelines for other areas once the Shoreline update was completed in the latter part of 2007. He invited
the Council to assist in prioritizing neighborhood areas, recalling there were Comprehensive Plan
amendments regarding Firdale and Five Corners and the Comprehensive Plan has always identified the
unique aspects of Westgate. Councilmember Dawson commented Westgate was a likely candidate as it
seemed ripe for redevelopment.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether the ADB would be involved in the process for neighborhood
districts. Mr. Chave anticipated beginning by discussing overall parameters such as height, bulk, etc.
with the Planning Board and then involving the ADB.
Councilmember Dawson recalled under the proposed process, the ADB would be involved with
developing design guidelines for other areas. Mr. Chave anticipated the ADB would consider their design
guidelines and for the particular district, determine whether there were aspects of the code that were not
appropriate or other elements that needed to be added. That discussion would also include what items
should be guidelines versus elements that were so important they needed to be in the code.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Chave anticipated the design guidelines for other neighborhoods would
be provided to the Council late this year or early next year depending on the Shoreline update and the
code rewrite. Councilmember Dawson asked whether community meetings would be held in those
districts. Mr. Chave agreed they would be.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the 120 day period, clarifying only staff’s time counted toward the 120
days. Mr. Chave agreed, noting some applicants may be in a hurry and proceed rapidly through the
process; others would take longer.
Councilmember Orvis observed both processes would be retained and the new process would apply only
to Hwy. 99 and downtown. Mr. Chave agreed. Councilmember Orvis asked whether the Council could
make a distinction between downtown zones such as BD1. Mr. Chave answered theoretically but it could
potentially be very confusing. Councilmember Orvis observed there were currently design standards in
place; if the proposed process were enacted, only the guidelines would be place. Mr. Chave answered
there were also the standards in the BD zone as well as the design objectives specific to downtown in the
Comprehensive Plan and the landscaping standards. Mr. Chave commented if Councilmember Orvis’
concern was the historic elements for BD1, the Council could make a policy decision to delay the upfront
process for BD1. He noted that even though all the standards may not yet have been determined for the
BD1, the proposed process was superior to the existing process.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Don Kreiman, Edmonds, expressed support for the proposed design guidelines. He pointed out baby
boomers are living longer and Edmonds’ demographics were changing. When the baby boomers begin
retiring in 2011, many will want housing in areas where they can walk and use public transit. He agreed
the City needed to begin developing design guidelines for other neighborhoods.
Rob Michel, Edmonds, recalled the Council requested staff provide examples and research other cities
that used the upfront process which did not appear to have been done. He expressed concern with the
amount of time to conduct two public hearings, noting the new process did not appear to meet Regulatory
Reform which allowed only one public hearing. He provided an example of an application submitted on
January 1, staff taking a month for review making it too late to schedule for the February ADB meeting
requiring a delay until the March 1 ADB meeting. At the March 1 ADB meeting a list of criteria was
Packet Page 20 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 7
established which the applicant then responded to. The applicant submitted their response on April 1 and
staff took 30 days to review, causing them to miss the May ADB meeting. He concluded staff would
have used up the 120 days before the applicant learned whether their design was approved by the ADB.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented on increased revenue from car dealerships on Hwy. 99. He recalled
the Council passed design guidelines for Hwy. 99 that established 60-75 foot building heights which
would bring in more businesses and more people.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled his comments at the previous public hearing expressing concern that
the proposed process would take much longer than the existing process. He pointed out if a project was
under the threshold established by SEPA, design review was conducted by staff and the decision was not
appealable, thereby removing the public from the process if a project was under the SEPA threshold. He
recalled there had been a question regarding whether Old Milltown met the SEPA threshold but there
were no drawings to confirm it. He objected to an applicant providing conceptual drawings via the
proposed process. With regard to appeals, he questioned how the hearing on a SEPA appeal, rezone,
and/or variance would be combined if there was only one public hearing. He concluded it appeared the
process for the applicant as well as the public would be more complex. He recommended the Council
delay a final decision on adopting the proposed process until all the public’s questions were addressed.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
In response to Mr. Michel’s concern about the timeline, Mr. Chave explained the ADB typically met once
a month now but reserved a second meeting each month. Because the timeline in the new process was
shorter, the ADB planned to meet twice a month. He pointed out the basis for the process was the
projects with the most impact were the ones that should be reviewed. The City’s SEPA threshold was
fairly low; many cities have raised their threshold but Edmonds had not. He cautioned against lowering
the SEPA threshold so that more were under ADB. He noted that was the reason that as many design
standards as possible should be included in the code so they could not be debated at the public hearing but
an applicant would know what was expected.
In response to Mr. Michel’s question regarding multiple hearings, City Attorney Scott Snyder advised
there would be one public hearing before the ADB that was continued, a hearing in two parts with a
decision after the second phase of the hearing. With regard to the comment that staff’s decision was not
appealable, he assumed it referred to the staff decision that was akin to a building permit, noting that was
nearly identical to the current process where staff issued the building permit based on the ADB decision.
Mr. Snyder advised the draft ordinance referenced Regulatory Reform which provides for a consolidation
process with the hearing held by the body with the highest authority.
Councilmember Plunkett assumed staff would monitor the new process, report back to the Council and
recommend any changes. Mr. Chave agreed, advising the computerized permit tracking system could
track dates and provide a report regarding the time it took from application submittal to the first phase, the
time between the first phase and second phase, etc.
Councilmember Plunkett asked what would happen if he suggested an amendment that required once an
application was complete, staff shall hold the ADB review within 30 days and staff could not hold the
meeting for 35 days. Mr. Snyder commented staff could schedule the hearing within 30 days, but had no
control over issues such as quorums. Councilmember Plunkett clarified his intent was to have the ADB
review held within 30 days. Mr. Chave commented when an application was turned in would determine
whether 30 days would be enough time. Mr. Snyder commented if worded correctly, it would be an
administrative guideline where the remedy was not an invalidated decision but forcing the staff to
Packet Page 21 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 8
schedule the hearing. He was hesitant to put strictures on the ADB because they may want to continue
the hearing to take more evidence, etc. He suggested giving the ADB the latitude to get their work done.
Councilmember Plunkett commented his intent was not to provide latitude but to require the ADB hearing
be held within 30 days of a complete application. Mr. Chave preferred not to establish a mandatory
number of days in the code but include in the adopting ordinance that it was Council’s policy for staff to
strive to schedule hearings within 30 days, making it an administrative guideline rather than something in
the code. Mr. Snyder suggested the Council request by motion a staff report within six months regarding
the time the process took and then the Council determine whether to impose a requirement. Mr. Snyder
agreed to draft language for Council consideration.
For Councilmember Marin, Mr. Chave explained as soon as an applicant applied and staff determined the
application was complete, the 120 day clock started. Once the applicant submitted the information
following the phase one hearing, the clock began again. Councilmember Marin asked the difference
between the information presented at the first phase versus the second phase. Mr. Chave answered at the
second phase the information would be more detailed and focus on what the building looked like; the first
phase addressed massing, relationship of the site to its surroundings, intended uses, etc., to provide the
ADB enough information to identify which criteria needed to be addressed. At the second phase, there
would be more detail such as elevations, building design, etc. without the specific detail regarding
materials, colors, utility systems, etc.
Councilmember Marin asked who did the work between phase one and phase two. Mr. Chave answered
the applicant. Councilmember Marin asked if the clock was running during that time; Mr. Chave
answered the 120 day clock stopped while the applicant worked on their submission. The clock began
again when the applicant submitted their response which was in accordance with Regulatory Reform.
The benefit for an applicant that did not need much time was they could respond quickly and the clock
would begin again. For an applicant that wanted a general idea before pursuing a detailed design, they
could take the time they needed. Councilmember Marin presumed an applicant could come to the first
phase, glean information and within a week be ready to schedule the second phase. Mr. Chave agreed it
would depend on the applicant.
Councilmember Marin inquired about the number of items on ADB meeting agendas. Mr. Chave
answered their agendas were not very full. The time to schedule an ADB hearing would be impacted by
the time necessary for advertising. He anticipated the shortest turnaround time would be three weeks.
Councilmember Marin observed it would be important for the ADB to hold two meetings a month.
Council President Olson asked staff to review the materials in the packet regarding other cities that use
the upfront process. Mr. Chave advised staff found several cities including Mercer Island, Issaquah and
Seattle that utilize a variation of an upfront design review process to review conceptual design earlier in
the process. These cities indicated their process worked well, even Seattle which had a fairly lengthy
process. He noted staff also talked to other cities such as Bothell and Mukilteo who employ an
administrative design review where design review occurs at the building permit phase. He noted that
process could also be problematic if an applicant did not seek guidance early in the process and staff
identified issues with aspects of their design at the building permit phase. He noted Snohomish used
design review only in their Historic District, a more specific and targeted design review.
Council President Olson concluded several other cities were using some variation of an upfront process.
Mr. Chave agreed although none of them were the same.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan that applied to every
zone. Mr. Chave agreed there were design objectives in the Urban Design Element that applied citywide
Packet Page 22 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 9
and another set in the Downtown Plan that applied only to downtown. Councilmember Orvis observed
the design objectives were in place regardless of whether the proposed process was adopted. If the
Council passed the proposed process, it would go from design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan and
standards to objectives and guidelines without historic standards. Mr. Chave clarified the City did not
currently have historic standards in the code.
Councilmember Orvis noted there was an effort underway to develop historic standards. By adopting the
proposed process, there would only be design guidelines and objectives in downtown. Mr. Chave
explained the criteria in 20.11.030 would no longer be applied to areas using the district-based review
process but district-based review would use the ADB’s design guidelines which are outlined on page 30
of the Council packet. He reiterated he found the proposed process superior to the current process
because it provided more guidance. Mr. Snyder commented in theory the specific controlled the general
and the specific guidelines should be used to apply the general criteria. He suggested that was the way
the code should be applied.
Councilmember Orvis commented design guidelines did not carry the weight of the code. Mr. Snyder
noted in this instance they did; they explained how the code was to be applied. Councilmember Orvis
noted design guidelines were not as binding as the code. Mr. Snyder commented if the Council wanted
something done, it should be included in the code as a zoning requirement; design guidelines were of the
either/or nature allowing the goal of the code to be accomplished in a number of ways. If the Council
wanted something done one way, it needed to be a code-specific provision. He noted the City’s
obligation was also to give specific direction to developers. If the Council wanted specifics with
regarding to historic preservation, it should be in the code. Mr. Chave commented his primary concern
with the criteria in 20.11.030 was that many were guidelines in the guise of code. He found the ADB’s
guidelines provided more direction.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether the criteria in 20.11.030 applied in both processes and the
guidelines were explanations. Mr. Snyder advised one of the changes identified in his memo was in
20.11.020 he provided more detail on how the two were to be integrated. He noted the criteria in
20.11.030 were the same as cited in Issaquah v. Anderson; further direction must be provided with regard
to how they were applied. That direction is applied via the Urban Design Element.
Councilmember Dawson clarified if the Council adopted the proposed process, it would not eliminate the
specificity in the code but add to it. Mr. Chave explained when the design objectives were adopted in the
Comprehensive Plan, the relationship between the design objectives and the criteria was not explained in
the code. Councilmember Dawson clarified if the Council exempted a zone from the new process, there
would not be more protection for that zone but less because the criteria in the code was not being
eliminated but added to. Mr. Snyder agreed, noting staff’s intent was to continue adding specificity for
developers.
Councilmember Dawson referred to Councilmember Orvis’ concern about abandoning the existing
standards, commenting those would not be abandoned but added to. Mr. Chave clarified the criteria in
20.11.030 did not apply in the new process; 20.11.030 was the existing process and 20.12 was the new
process. The criteria in 20.11.030 do not appear in 20.12. Mr. Snyder advised he was addressing the
general process. Using massive and monotonous as examples, he explained there were a variety of
techniques in the Urban Design Guidelines that stated how they applied, those same techniques existed
but without the vague criteria that was at issue in Anderson v. Issaquah.
Councilmember Dawson explained Councilmember Orvis’ concern appeared to be whether there were
items that should be included in the code such as with regard to historic preservation. The code criteria
were not included in the proposed process. Mr. Snyder agreed. Councilmember Dawson asked whether
Packet Page 23 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 10
there were any code criterion that would be proposed to the Council soon that should be inserted prior to
adopting the proposed process. Mr. Chave answered the only thing he was aware of was historic
preservation related to the BD1 zone. He noted that was on a separate track; the Historic Preservation
Commission still had to report their ideas to the Council which would then proceed to the Planning Board
for review. The value of the upfront process and the ADB design guidelines outweighed any benefit of
waiting for the historic preservation standards. Mr. Snyder explained his concern has always been an
attempt to apply one of the broad, general criterion without using the specifics provided by design
guidelines due to the as-applied issues that arose in Anderson v. Issaquah. He explained an ordinance
could be unconstitutional on its face or as applied.
Councilmember Dawson inquired about the timeframe for the Historic Preservation Commission to
complete that effort. Mr. Chave anticipated the Commission would have a report to the Council within
the next month. It would then be forwarded to the Planning Board for public hearing, thus it was a 4-6
month process.
Councilmember Dawson commented if something arose that needed to be included, it could be done via
an interim zoning ordinance prior to the Planning Board review. Mr. Snyder agreed.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the Hinshaw/Chave historic design standards that he will move
forward regardless of the Historic Preservation Commission. He noted the only thing delaying the
Historic Preservation Commission was additions to the process, not the code. He advised the
Commission was meeting in the next two weeks and he anticipated the historic design standards would be
presented to the Council in mid-April. He commented although the Council could adopt the
Hinshaw/Chave design standards via an interim zoning ordinance, he was hesitant to do that as it was a
lengthy document to adopt without Planning Board review.
Councilmember Orvis supported the concept of an interim solution to downtown to bridge what he
considered to be a hole between the existing process and the historic design standards.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN,
THAT THE COUNCIL ADOPT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IN EXHIBIT 1, ORDINANCE
NO. 3636.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO
ADD THE FOLLOWING TO THE END OF THE FIRST SENTENCE IN D-6, “WHILE
MAINTAINING ACCESS TO UTILITIES.” AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Plunkett commented although he was confident in staff’s ability to process applications,
he shared the concern of developers and proposed including language regarding the 120 day time period.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
REVISE SECTION 20.12.005.A TO READ, “PUBLIC HEARING (PHASE 1). THE APPLICANT
SHALL SUBMIT A PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN TO THE CITY. STAFF SHALL
SCHEDULE THE FIRST PHASE OF THE ADB HEARING WITHIN 30 DAYS OF STAFF’S
DETERMINATION THAT THE APPLICATION IS COMPLETE.”
Councilmember Dawson voiced her support for the motion, noting it provided staff time to determine
whether the application was complete. She did not anticipate this would put an undue hardship on staff
and if it was an issue for staff, it could be brought to the Council’s attention.
Packet Page 24 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 11
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance reads as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 3636 – AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE BY THE REPEAL AND RE-ENACTMENT OF CHAPTER 20.10
RELATED TO DESIGN REVIEW, THE RE-ENACTMENT OF A NEW CHAPTER 20.11
GENERAL DESIGN REVIEW, A NEW CHAPTER 20.12 DISTRICT-BASED DESIGN REVIEW,
REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING CHAPTER 20.13 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS,
ADOPTING NEW DESIGN GUIDELINES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
8. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the City needed to negotiate with the Edmonds School District
regarding the $1 million price break on the purchase of the old Woodway Elementary School site that
required removal of structures by June 30, 2007 unless a park plan was adopted by that time. Next, he
recommended the Council vote on term limits. The third issue he addressed was the changes Bothell had
made to their plan.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to a concern voiced by Councilmember Wambolt at the March 6
meeting that the public would not see detailed design at the public hearing and that this was a concern to
citizens because under the existing process, the public hearing was held after the detailed design was
created, yet many buildings when constructed did not look like the plans. Mr. Hertrich provided a list of
what might be provided in a detailed design – size of windows; color of roof; number of plants and type;
roof equipment; trim color, size and location; flower boxes; dumpster locations; location of garage doors;
etc. – concluding there were many elements that would not be available to members of the public who
wanted to see what the building looked like. He suggested any Councilmember who had concerns about
the process should reconsider their vote.
Natalie Shippen, Edmonds, commented in December 2005 the Council added what she considered a gag
rule to the Council procedures that states the opportunity for public comment shall not include comments
that promote or oppose ballot measures except during the course of a public hearing. It was her
understanding that she could state that the Edmonds Crossing project was an extremely extravagant farce
and state the reasons why as long as she did not say vote against Sound Transit and RTID. Mr. Snyder
explained the rule Ms. Shippen cited attempted to recognize that public facilities under State law could
not be used to promote or oppose ballot measures or candidates. A member of the public at the podium
could not say/do anything more than the Council could say/do; the Council was prohibited from
promoting or opposing a ballot measure. He clarified Ms. Shippen could inform the Council that the
process/proposal was ill-conceived but neither she nor the Council could urge voters to support or oppose
a ballot measure or candidate unless very specific rules were followed.
Ms. Shippen asked whether she could say Edmonds Crossing was a farce as long as she did not say vote
against the ballot measure. Mr. Snyder supported her first amendment right to do so. He explained the
Council and staff could perform the normal functions of their office, debate public policy and provide
factual information. He noted Ms. Shippen always presented factual information and presented a point of
view; he had no issue as long as she addressed the project itself on a factual basis and did not urge voters
to vote for or against a ballot measure.
Ms. Shippen commented the Council took a position on a ballot measure in Agenda Item #5. Mayor
Haakenson explained it was a resolution related to the integrated road and transit plan developed by RTID
and Sound Transit and did not address a ballot measure. Councilmember Dawson explained under
Packet Page 25 of 396
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
April 3, 2007
Page 12
Agenda Item #5, the Council voted to support two measures being on a ballot, not urging the public to
vote in support of or against the ballot measure. Mr. Snyder commented in advising the Council, he used
the Public Disclosure Commission’s guidelines with regard to information the City could provide.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson commented he was feeling much better than he did last Tuesday when he was absent
from the Council meeting due to illness.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Olson wished Councilmember Orvis a Happy Birthday on April 12th.
Councilmember Dawson welcomed Student Representative Callahan, noting his biography stated he was
voted by his class as most likely to be elected President.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to Mr. Hertrich’s comment that buildings may be approved by staff
that citizens/Councilmembers may not like, acknowledging there was that chance. He pointed out this
process was not chiseled in stone and could be revised if ugly buildings were being constructed.
Councilmember Marin advised last Wednesday the Snohomish County Tomorrow Steering Committee
had planned to discuss the annexation principles that had been developed by a subcommittee. As the
legislature was considering a bill on this subject that was supported by AWC, the Steering Committee set
aside their discussion and expressed their support for the legislative bill.
Student Representative Callahan thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve. He planned in the
future to inform the Council and public about sports and drama schedules at Edmonds-Woodway High
School. He encouraged the Council and the public to support high school sports and activities.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:48 p.m.
Packet Page 26 of 396
AM-928 2.D.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services
Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #95345 through #95507 for April 5, 2007 in the amount of $377,063.39
and #95508 through #95682 for April 12, 2007 in the amount of $441,911.82. Approval of payroll
direct deposit and checks #44670 through #44724 for the period of March 16 through March 31,
2007 in the amount of $817,018.64.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 2007
Revenue:
Expenditure: 1,635,993.85
Fiscal Impact:
Claims $ 818,975.21
Payroll$ 817,018.64
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 4-5-07
Link: Claim cks 4-12-07
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 04/12/2007 11:44 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Packet Page 27 of 396
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 01:04 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:17 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 04/06/2007 10:29
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 28 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95345 4/5/2007 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 37271 BASKETBALL SHIRTS
BASKETBALL T-SHIRTS FOR LEAGUE PLAY
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 141.15
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 12.56
Total :153.71
95346 4/5/2007 071373 AGRO DISTRIBUTING LLC 2228615 RI GARDENING SUPPLIES
ROUNDUP
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.12
Total :261.12
95347 4/5/2007 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101177594 TEST GAS
TEST GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,275.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 112.20
Total :1,387.20
95348 4/5/2007 000710 ALASKAN COPPER & BRASS 401292-1 C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT
C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 936.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 82.37
Total :1,018.37
95349 4/5/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 882887 UNIT 8 - BATTERY
UNIT 8 - BATTERY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 84.95
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.56
Total :92.51
1Page:
Packet Page 29 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95350 4/5/2007 068901 ALL THE KING'S FLAGS 28456 CEMETERY FLAG
US FLAG AND COAST GUARD FLAG FOR
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 102.85
Freight
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 5.50
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 9.05
Total :117.40
95351 4/5/2007 069565 AMERICAN LAFRANCE NW LLC P54697 UNIT 476 - LIMIT SWITCH
UNIT 476 - LIMIT SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 144.74
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.56
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.36
Total :175.66
95352 4/5/2007 069829 AMIDO, BENJAMIM AMIDO7981 UKULELE CLASSES
UKULELE CLASS #7981
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 308.00
Total :308.00
95353 4/5/2007 001528 AMTEST 43343 ICP SCAN
ICP SCAN
411.000.656.538.800.410.31 50.00
Total :50.00
95354 4/5/2007 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC KQ49 PRIORITY POLLUTANTS TESTING
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS TESTING
411.000.656.538.800.410.31 1,664.00
Total :1,664.00
95355 4/5/2007 070265 ANDERSON, BLAKE D 3/26/07 Tuition Reimbursement - 1/3 - 3/11/07
Tuition Reimbursement - 1/3 - 3/11/07
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 997.00
2Page:
Packet Page 30 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :997.00953554/5/2007 070265 070265 ANDERSON, BLAKE D
95356 4/5/2007 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 40151375 4011343
ELASTOMERIC COUPLING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 32.39
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 38.78
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.26
Total :77.43
95357 4/5/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3847328 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 150.11
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 13.36
Total :163.47
95358 4/5/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3847330 18386001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.06
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.57
Total :92.63
95359 4/5/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3840993 FLEET UNIFORM SVC
FLEET UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-3842343
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
3Page:
Packet Page 31 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95359 4/5/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
FLEET UNIFORM SVC512-3845753
FLEET UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55
PW MATS512-3845754
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26
WATER UNIFORM SVC
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.13
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.49
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.49
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.49
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.49
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.49
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.59
4Page:
Packet Page 32 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95359 4/5/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC512-3845755
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29
FAC MAINT - UNIFORM SVC512-3847329
FAC MAINT - UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
Total :157.11
95360 4/5/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 556210 75179
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,094.60
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 167.57
Total :2,262.17
95361 4/5/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 556413 DIESEL - 181 GAL
DIESEL - 181 GAL
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 365.10
WA ST SERVICE FEE
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00
ST EXCISE DIESEL TAX, WA OIL SPILL
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 64.65
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80
Total :494.55
95362 4/5/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-1124 PARKS MAINT. BLDG
5Page:
Packet Page 33 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95362 4/5/2007 (Continued)064343 AT&T
PARKS MAINT. BLDG
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 25.73
CEMETERY425-771-4741
CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 34.53
Total :60.26
95363 4/5/2007 064343 AT&T 730386050200 425-744-6057 PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 8.38
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 8.38
Public Works Fax Line
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 2.21
Public Works Fax Line
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 8.38
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 8.38
Public Works Fax Line
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 8.38
Total :44.11
95364 4/5/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-0152 STATION #16 FAX
STATION #16 FAX
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 25.78
Total :25.78
95365 4/5/2007 070434 AURORA PLASTICS & PACKAGING 14723 INV#14723 EDMONDS PD
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 2.98
4 X 6 .004 MIL ZIPLOCK BAGS (1000)
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 33.45
Total :36.43
95366 4/5/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 39892 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
6Page:
Packet Page 34 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95366 4/5/2007 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #600 PRINTING
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 31.10
UB Outsourcing area #600 PRINTING
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 31.10
UB Outsourcing area #600 POSTAGE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 90.59
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.74
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.74
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.74
UB Outsourcing area #600 PRINTING
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 31.18
UB Outsourcing area #600 POSTAGE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 90.60
Total :282.79
95367 4/5/2007 002100 BARNARD, EARL 38 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 30.00
Total :30.00
95368 4/5/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 576586 INV#576586 EDMONDS PD - TONY COLLINS
7Page:
Packet Page 35 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95368 4/5/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
HEAVY WEIGHT HAND TRAINER
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.95
TIES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 11.90
BELT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95
ELBOW AND KNEE GUARDS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 34.90
BELT KEEPERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.25
TRAFFIC TEMPLATE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.95
SILVER BUTTONS W/TOGGLES, WASHERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 21.00
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 17.24
ATAC 6" BOOT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.99
Total :213.13
95369 4/5/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1450957 C161
C-161 SCREENINGS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 2,892.60
Total :2,892.60
95370 4/5/2007 067947 BROWNELLS INC 04317085.00 INV#04317085.00 ACCT#00557761 EDMONDS PD
8Page:
Packet Page 36 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95370 4/5/2007 (Continued)067947 BROWNELLS INC
AR-15 MULTI-TOOL
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 21.60
M16/AR-15 CHAMBER MOP (DOZEN)
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 15.89
AR15 DCF HANDGUARD REMOVAL TOOL
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 20.00
ROD ADAPTERS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 8.40
S&W LARGE STORAGE CASE
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 9.50
Freight
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 9.25
Total :84.64
95371 4/5/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY105106 SUPPLIES
POLIFAN, GRINDING WHEEL, HINGES, BRUSHES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 73.67
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.56
Total :80.23
95372 4/5/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 105158 WATER - CARBON DIOXIDE FILL FEES
WATER - CARBON DIOXIDE FILL FEES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 38.13
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.39
Total :41.52
95373 4/5/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY105347 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 27.82
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.48
Total :30.30
9Page:
Packet Page 37 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95374 4/5/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT7705 CHILDREN'S CLASSES
MARCH MORNINGS OUT #7705
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 35.00
FRIDAY NIGHTS OUT #7659
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 92.40
Total :127.40
95375 4/5/2007 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 700605-0001 E7FB.Hinrichs Cl No GC025231
E7FB.Hinrichs Cl No GC025231
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,195.00
Total :1,195.00
95376 4/5/2007 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 700605-002 E7FB.Hinrichs CI No GC025231
E7FB.Hinrichs CI No GC025231
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 240.00
Total :240.00
95377 4/5/2007 071587 CIE INC C-13010180 INV#C-13010180 EDMONDS PD
SUM 296 SIG SAUER HOLSTER
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 53.56
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 9.95
Total :63.51
95378 4/5/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-369-4557 CELL PHONE FLEET
cell phone fleet
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 11.64
Total :11.64
95379 4/5/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 871747052X04052007 D Bowman 3/8-3/25/07.
D Bowman 3/8-3/25/07.
001.000.620.558.800.420.00 6.44
Total :6.44
95380 4/5/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 4X04032007 ALS COMMUNICATIONS
IRIS
001.000.510.526.100.420.00 1.43
10Page:
Packet Page 38 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1.43953804/5/2007 064341 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS
95381 4/5/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460536243 OPS UNIFORMS
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03
UNIFORMS460593034
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPS UNIFORMS460593035
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51
OPS UNIFORMS460594092
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 101.09
Stn 17 - Ops
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 101.09
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.99
OPS UNIFORMS460594115
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03
Total :656.98
95382 4/5/2007 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FINANCIAL 8877271 COPIER LEASE PW
INSURANCE FOR copier lease for PW
001.000.650.519.910.450.00 14.82
11Page:
Packet Page 39 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :14.82953824/5/2007 066070 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FINANCIAL
95383 4/5/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 0403 TRAINING SUPPLIES
EFD portion
001.000.510.522.400.310.00 57.79
Total :57.79
95384 4/5/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1767387 FAC MAINT - JUG PUMPS, CLEANER, BIG
FAC MAINT - JUG PUMPS, CLEANER, BIG
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 593.64
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 52.46
FAC MAINT - GOOD SENSE, COMPLETE FINISHW1767509
FAC MAINT - GOOD SENSE, COMPLETE FINISH
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 282.16
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.05
Total :958.31
95385 4/5/2007 065364 CONTRACT HARDWARE INC 0031903-IN YOST PARK - INSIDE MTG HARDWARE
YOST PARK - INSIDE MTG HARDWARE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 37.80
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.33
Total :41.13
95386 4/5/2007 070465 CONTRACT SOLUTIONS GROUP C/O Seminar Registration.Impr Const C/O Mgmt
Registration.Impr Const C/O Mgmt
001.000.620.532.200.490.00 189.00
Total :189.00
95387 4/5/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 6657247 ACC 1126518
12Page:
Packet Page 40 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95387 4/5/2007 (Continued)062891 COOK PAGING WA
pagers-water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 11.85
pagers-streets
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 11.85
pagers-storm
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 15.80
pagers-facilities
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 23.70
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.20
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 1.20
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 1.60
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 2.38
Total :69.58
95388 4/5/2007 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0307 2989771 5374044 INV#0307 2989771 5374044 EDMONDS PD
5 GALLON WATER BOTTLES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 50.43
HOT/COLD COOLER RENTAL
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.91
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.89
Total :63.23
95389 4/5/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS March 2007 MARCH 2007 DRS
March 2007 DRS
811.000.000.231.540.000.00 173,070.84
Total :173,070.84
95390 4/5/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2736 MINUTE TAKING
13Page:
Packet Page 41 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95390 4/5/2007 (Continued)064531 DINES, JEANNIE
3/27/07 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 232.40
Total :232.40
95391 4/5/2007 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL #3 MARCH 2007
State lobbyist for March 2007
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,135.00
Total :4,135.00
95392 4/5/2007 071596 EBORALL, STEVE EBORALL7833 ART CLASSES
ART DAZE #7833
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 97.50
Total :97.50
95393 4/5/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 78268 SUPPLIES
GREASE GUN, SILICONE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 56.73
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.05
Total :61.78
95394 4/5/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 75221 UNIT 55 - SERP BELT
UNIT 55 - SERP BELT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.22
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.76
UNIT 24 - SERP BELT76126
UNIT 24 - SERP BELT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 41.02
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.65
14Page:
Packet Page 42 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95394 4/5/2007 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
UNIT 537 - PLUG TAPS76971
UNIT 537 - PLUG TAPS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.68
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.59
UNIT M16 - CORROSIONX, GEAR LUBE78082
UNIT M16 - CORROSIONX, GEAR LUBE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.84
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.48
UNIT M16 - DRAIN PAN78084
UNIT M16 - DRAIN PAN
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.49
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.76
Total :137.49
95395 4/5/2007 063066 EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ECC0329 GYM RENTAL
GYM RENTAL FOR 5-ON-5 BASKETBALL LEAGUE
001.000.640.575.520.450.00 2,200.00
Total :2,200.00
95396 4/5/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 10023 UPS/MCMASTER-CARR/DEPT L & I
UPS/MCMASTER-CARR/DEPT L & I
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 14.17
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 1.26
BROWN & CALDWELL10031
BROWN & CALDWELL
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 9.99
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.89
15Page:
Packet Page 43 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95396 4/5/2007 (Continued)070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL
BROWN & CALDWELL10046
BROWN & CALDWELL
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 9.22
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.82
Total :36.35
95397 4/5/2007 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP WINN0330 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP:~
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 450.00
Total :450.00
95398 4/5/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 023650 ADMIN MAINT
Admin copier maint.
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 69.39
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 6.18
Total :75.57
95399 4/5/2007 069117 EMERALD SERVICES INC 373948 CR FOR USED OIL SOLD TO EMERALD 11/22/06
CR FOR USED OIL SOLD TO EMERALD 11/22/06
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 -60.00
CR FOR USED OIL SOLD TO EMERALD383996
CR FOR USED OIL SOLD TO EMERALD
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 -45.00
FLEET SHOP - RECYCLE FEES394535
FLEET SHOP - RECYCLE FEES
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 294.00
Total :189.00
95400 4/5/2007 009880 FEDEX 8-760-65872 Messenger Service-CTAC Proposal
Messenger Service-CTAC Proposal
001.000.310.514.100.410.00 108.17
Total :108.17
95401 4/5/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0085995-1 WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRLIDDI-01-010
16Page:
Packet Page 44 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95401 4/5/2007 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRLIDDI-01-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 686.98
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 61.14
Total :748.12
95402 4/5/2007 064131 GAI-TRONICS 44634365 PARTS FOR INTERCOM
PARTS FOR INTERCOM
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 469.89
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 55.24
Total :525.13
95403 4/5/2007 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY 2070940-01 BEARINGS/SEALS
BEARINGS/SEALS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,896.83
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 43.09
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 170.71
OIL SEAL/BALL BEARINGS2071209-01
OIL SEAL/BALL BEARINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 513.18
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.15
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 46.05
Total :2,680.01
95404 4/5/2007 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA GLEISNER7966 TAI CHI/QIGONG
17Page:
Packet Page 45 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95404 4/5/2007 (Continued)068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA
QIGONG #7966
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 425.25
TAIJIQUAN #7612
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 270.00
TAIJIQUAN #7610
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 270.00
TAIJIQUAN #7607
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 472.50
Total :1,437.75
95405 4/5/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9326360659 837944131
PLIERS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 27.65
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.43
Total :30.08
95406 4/5/2007 069864 GRAPHIC ENTERPRISES INC AR126332 K&E/8036 OVERAGE CHARGES 2/26-3/25/07 -
K&E/8036 OVERAGE CHARGES 2/26-3/25/07 -
001.000.620.524.100.480.00 113.05
Sales Tax
001.000.620.524.100.480.00 10.06
Total :123.11
95407 4/5/2007 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 06713.00-6 E6DA.Services thr 03/10/07
E6DA.Services thr 03/10/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 20,491.74
Total :20,491.74
95408 4/5/2007 012233 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 924693860 STREET - 3X36X4 ANCHOR BOLT SET
STREET - 3X36X4 ANCHOR BOLT SET
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 125.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 11.01
Total :136.01
18Page:
Packet Page 46 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95409 4/5/2007 061965 GW AUTO REBUILD RO 31281 UNIT 89 - SERVICE AND REPAIR
UNIT 89 - SERVICE AND REPAIR
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 4,621.21
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 411.28
Total :5,032.49
95410 4/5/2007 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 78266 /1 WATER INVENTORY - ~
WATER INVENTORY - ~
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 531.90
NON INVENTORY - 2" METER FLANGE GASKETS
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 106.40
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 40.42
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.09
Total :686.81
95411 4/5/2007 070437 HARDIE, MARY ANN 11/20/06 Tuition Reimbursement - Winter Qtr.
Tuition Reimbursement - Winter Qtr.
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 997.50
Total :997.50
95412 4/5/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 71130 UNIT 233 - OIL SEAL ASSEMBLY
UNIT 233 - OIL SEAL ASSEMBLY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.70
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.13
UNIT 233 - FLANGED NUT71135
UNIT 233 - FLANGED NUT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.38
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.83
19Page:
Packet Page 47 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95412 4/5/2007 (Continued)012900 HARRIS FORD INC
UNIT 239 - MUFFLER ASSEMBLY71413
UNIT 239 - MUFFLER ASSEMBLY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 122.59
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.91
UNIT 238 - WINDOW SWITCH71429
UNIT 238 - WINDOW SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 40.58
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.61
UNIT 238 - LIGHT PROCESSOR71432
UNIT 238 - LIGHT PROCESSOR
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 331.43
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 29.50
UNIT 104 - WHEEL COVER71741
UNIT 104 - WHEEL COVER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.60
UNIT 481 - ROTOR ASSEMBLY, BRAKE SHOE72024
UNIT 481 - ROTOR ASSEMBLY, BRAKE SHOE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 193.68
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.24
Total :793.16
95413 4/5/2007 071597 HOANG, THUAN AND SUONG 2-27300 RE: #1-9813-KSMB UTILITY REFUND
UB Refund #1-9813-KSMB Hoang/Steele
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 87.24
Total :87.24
95414 4/5/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 018230 OPS SUPPLIES
batteries
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 154.14
20Page:
Packet Page 48 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :154.14954144/5/2007 070896 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
95415 4/5/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72775831 COPIER LEASE
RECREATION COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 627.24
COPIER LEASE72819920
PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 29.97
Total :657.21
95416 4/5/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72819917 FINANCE COPIER RENTAL 3/22-4/21/07
Finance Copier Rental 3/22-4/21/07
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07
Additional images 2/3-3/3-07
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 743.81
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 106.62
Total :1,304.50
95417 4/5/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 72819907 RECEPTION COPIER CHARGES FROM
RECEPTION COPIER CHARGES FROM
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 122.24
LARGE D.S. COPIER CHARGES FROM72819913
LARGE D.S. COPIER CHARGES FROM
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 924.83
COLOR COPIER CHARGES FROM 2/23-3/23/07.72819915
COLOR COPIER CHARGES FROM 2/23-3/23/07.
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,434.04
Total :2,481.11
95418 4/5/2007 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 2586402 INTERNET ACCESS
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00
Total :15.00
95419 4/5/2007 071591 IVES, DOROTHY IVES0329 REFUND
21Page:
Packet Page 49 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95419 4/5/2007 (Continued)071591 IVES, DOROTHY
CLASS REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 166.00
Total :166.00
95420 4/5/2007 071598 JACKSON, DOUGLAS 3-33850 RE: #1-0702-179 UTILITY REFUND
UB Refund #1-0702-179 Jackson/ Odenwald
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 130.28
Total :130.28
95421 4/5/2007 071592 KERNS, MILNIECE KERNS0326 REFUND
REFUND FOR CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 86.00
Total :86.00
95422 4/5/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 75403 OPS UNIFORMS
Erickson, Nichols
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 984.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 86.64
ALS UNIFORM76092
Hoover belt
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 16.90
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 1.49
Total :1,089.53
95423 4/5/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1009375764 INV#1009375764 ACCT#5560008 EDMONDS
ENVIROCIDE 24 OZ PUMP
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 28.80
ENVIROCIDE - GALLON REFILL
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 83.40
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 29.23
Total :141.43
95424 4/5/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0020703 810 WALNUT ST - ENVIRONMENTAL
22Page:
Packet Page 50 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95424 4/5/2007 (Continued)017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
810 WALNUT ST - ENVIRONMENTAL
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 673.00
Total :673.00
95425 4/5/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 3007-294 MOWER SUPPLIES
MOWER SUPPLIES:~
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 214.77
Freight
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 25.87
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 21.42
Total :262.06
95426 4/5/2007 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 122981 UNIT 116 - ALIGNMENT
UNIT 116 - ALIGNMENT
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 49.95
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 4.45
UNIT 89 - ALIGNMENT123263
UNIT 89 - ALIGNMENT
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 49.95
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 4.45
Total :108.80
95427 4/5/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093803 ENVELOPES FOR DEV. SVCS. & PLANNING.
ENVELOPES FOR DEV. SVCS. & PLANNING.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 376.00
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 33.46
Total :409.46
95428 4/5/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093833 INV#93833 EDMONDS PD
23Page:
Packet Page 51 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95428 4/5/2007 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
CANON FX-7 TONER CARTRIDGE
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 218.18
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 19.42
Total :237.60
95429 4/5/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 515841 UNIT 24 - SWITCH
UNIT 24 - SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.09
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.52
UNIT 31 - OIL FLITERS516059
UNIT 31 - OIL FLITERS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 35.61
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.17
UNIT 80 - LUBE AND FUEL FILTERS516136
UNIT 80 - LUBE AND FUEL FILTERS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.96
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.95
UNIT 70 - SEAL516212
UNIT 70 - SEAL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.39
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.66
UNIT 70 - SEAL516270
UNIT 70 - SEAL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.78
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.32
24Page:
Packet Page 52 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95429 4/5/2007 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
UNIT 24 - OIL FILTER516283
UNIT 24 - OIL FILTER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 28.18
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.51
UNIT 24 - AIR FILTER516395
UNIT 24 - AIR FILTER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.82
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.83
UNIT 16 - SEAL, FITTINGS516482
UNIT 16 - SEAL, FITTINGS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.57
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.50
UNIT 372 - OIL FILTER516761
UNIT 372 - OIL FILTER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.06
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.45
UNIT 3 - OIL FILTER516793
UNIT 3 - OIL FILTER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.66
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.41
UNIT 3 - AIR FILTER516861
UNIT 3 - AIR FILTER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.37
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.90
UNIT 475 - GOLD 9V BATTERY516951
UNIT 475 - GOLD 9V BATTERY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.53
25Page:
Packet Page 53 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95429 4/5/2007 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
UNIT 68 - RAD CAP517738
UNIT 68 - RAD CAP
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.45
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.49
UNIT 68 - SPARK PLUGS517826
UNIT 68 - SPARK PLUGS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.34
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.74
UNIT 998 - OIL FILTER518107
UNIT 998 - OIL FILTER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.18
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.46
UNIT 68 - VOLTAGE REG518160
UNIT 68 - VOLTAGE REG
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.66
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.82
UNIT 332 - SMALL LAMP518233
UNIT 332 - SMALL LAMP
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.08
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.36
Total :276.80
95430 4/5/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 556807 UNIT M16 - CASTLE 18M NUTS
UNIT M16 - CASTLE 18M NUTS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.24
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.49
Total :42.73
95431 4/5/2007 071589 M-F ATHLETIC COMPANY INC 582165-00 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS
26Page:
Packet Page 54 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95431 4/5/2007 (Continued)071589 M-F ATHLETIC COMPANY INC
exercise equipmt
001.000.510.522.200.359.00 194.85
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.359.00 19.95
Total :214.80
95432 4/5/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 61579798 123106800
TUBING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 34.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.00
12310680061771969
PIPE FITTINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 48.91
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.72
12310680061795650
FITTINGS/PLUGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 236.14
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.66
12310680061836900
PIPE FITTING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 29.18
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.37
12310680061840416
MICROMETER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 164.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.03
27Page:
Packet Page 55 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95432 4/5/2007 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
12310680061862716
PRESSURE HOSE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 72.87
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.03
12310680061873908
HEX CAP/HEX NUT
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 326.30
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.54
Total :958.75
95433 4/5/2007 069285 MERCER MD, JAMES 1003-007 ALS PRO SERVICES
March '07 med prgm dir
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,644.75
Total :1,644.75
95434 4/5/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 42046 RENTALS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 190.00
GAS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.65
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 16.91
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.21
Total :221.77
95435 4/5/2007 062204 NELSON TRUCK EQUIP CO INC 429976 UNIT 93PM - TOMMY GATE LIFT INSTALLED
UNIT 93PM - TOMMY GATE LIFT INSTALLED
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 2,168.21
Freight
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 250.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 212.80
28Page:
Packet Page 56 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95435 4/5/2007 (Continued)062204 NELSON TRUCK EQUIP CO INC
UNIT 93PM - SADDLE BOX INSTALLED434921
UNIT 93PM - SADDLE BOX INSTALLED
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 1,097.30
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 96.56
Total :3,824.87
95436 4/5/2007 070788 NETRIVER INC 35915 HOSTING PACKAGE
NON-PROFIT HOSTING PACKAGE:~
120.000.310.575.420.410.00 39.00
Total :39.00
95437 4/5/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 323912314-064 IT CELL PHONE SERVICE
IT Cell Phone Service 2/25-3/24/07
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 174.27
Total :174.27
95438 4/5/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 411191318-064 Cell Service 2/25-3/24/07 - Bldg. Dept.
Cell Service 2/25-3/24/07 - Bldg. Dept.
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 111.79
Total :111.79
95439 4/5/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 976032312-064 COMMUNICATIONS
Admin
001.000.510.522.100.420.00 22.33
Operations
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 409.26
Prevention
001.000.510.522.300.420.00 73.62
ALS
001.000.510.526.100.420.00 63.78
Total :568.99
95440 4/5/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1383530.001 2091
29Page:
Packet Page 57 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95440 4/5/2007 (Continued)024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY
INHIBITING BLOCK
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 127.20
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 10.94
Total :138.14
95441 4/5/2007 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS 15775 CITYEDMTRE
C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 420.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 36.12
Total :456.12
95442 4/5/2007 064006 NORTH WEST INSTRUMENT SERVICES 9075 INV#9075 EDMONDS PD
BALANCE THREE EVIDENCE SCALES
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 240.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 21.36
Total :261.36
95443 4/5/2007 071593 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY INC P171246100013 INSPECTION GLOVES FOR MARIE HARRISON -
INSPECTION GLOVES FOR MARIE HARRISON -
001.000.620.524.100.240.00 23.12
Freight
001.000.620.524.100.240.00 9.55
Total :32.67
95444 4/5/2007 066628 NORTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO 027522 FLEET SUPPLIES - AQUAPEL
FLEET SUPPLIES - AQUAPEL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 120.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.33
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.20
Total :133.53
30Page:
Packet Page 58 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95445 4/5/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 468 Transcrips,Verbatim R-06-95 3/14/07~
Transcrips,Verbatim R-06-95 3/14/07~
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 120.00
Total :120.00
95446 4/5/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 197299 OFFICE SUPPLIES
CYAN PRINTER CARTRIDGE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 28.16
King County Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES248888
COPYHOLDER
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 11.55
King County Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 0.93
OFFICE SUPPLIES263851
MISC. PAPER, FOLDERS, ETC.
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 326.39
King County Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 28.73
OFFICE SUPPLIES372016
FACIAL TISSUE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 7.42
King County Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES395445
PASTEL PAPER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 16.20
King County Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.34
OFFICE SUPPLIES408997
PHOTO PAPER
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 24.19
King County Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 2.04
31Page:
Packet Page 59 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :449.92954464/5/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
95447 4/5/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 950389 Toner Cartridge/stapler/adding machine
Toner Cartridge/stapler/adding machine
001.000.310.514.100.310.00 63.58
King County Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.100.310.00 5.59
Stapler994549
Stapler
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 12.78
Freight
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.00
King County Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.12
Total :84.07
95448 4/5/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 749169 PW ADMIN - PRINTER TONER
PW ADMIN - PRINTER TONER
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 79.98
King County Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 7.04
PW ADMIN COLOR PRINTER INKJETS766630
PW ADMIN COLOR PRINTER INKJETS
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 52.52
King County Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 4.62
Total :144.16
95449 4/5/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 625168 DAF8 DRAFTING FILM FROM BACK ORDER FOR
DAF8 DRAFTING FILM FROM BACK ORDER FOR
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 109.73
King County Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 9.65
32Page:
Packet Page 60 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95449 4/5/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - INCLUDING SWING872552
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - INCLUDING SWING
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 342.23
King County Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 30.11
CHAIRMAT - DAVE.878547
CHAIRMAT - DAVE.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 91.11
King County Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 8.01
Total :590.84
95450 4/5/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 876439 SUPPLIES
Ops-sheet protectors
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 14.38
Admin-stapler, etc.
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 22.41
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 0.39
Freight
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 0.61
King County Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1.27
King County Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 1.97
Total :41.03
95451 4/5/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 862592 INV#862592 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
LEGAL HANGING FILE FOLDERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 28.56
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.51
33Page:
Packet Page 61 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95451 4/5/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
INV#935047 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD935047
DESKJET INK
001.000.410.521.310.310.00 24.99
TWIN PACK 61X TONER
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 198.73
25-PACK OF DISKETTES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.34
SINGLE HOLE PUNCHES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.81
TAPE VALUE PACK
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 21.90
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.310.310.00 2.20
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 17.50
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3.17
Total :313.71
95452 4/5/2007 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER Feb COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 746.79
PSEA 1 ,2, 3 Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 15,340.65
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 388.50
State Patrol Death Investigations
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 707.11
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 1,977.62
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 1,769.87
Total :20,930.54
95453 4/5/2007 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS PACIFICNWFLOAT7934 ZODIAC ADVENTURE
34Page:
Packet Page 62 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95453 4/5/2007 (Continued)071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS
DECEPTION PASS ZODIAC ADVENTURE #7934
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 110.20
Total :110.20
95454 4/5/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 42836 STORM DUMP FEES
STORM DUMP FEES
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 97.23
Total :97.23
95455 4/5/2007 064070 PALMATIER, LISA PALMATIER0307 CONCERT COORDINATION
COORDINATION OF PARK CONCERT SERIES~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 150.00
Total :150.00
95456 4/5/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9538534 COPIER CONTRACT
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 12.60
Total :157.82
95457 4/5/2007 071599 PATTERSON, JEAN M 7-03975 RE: #4-0703-052 UTILITY REFUND
UB Refund #4-0703-052 Patterson/Heines
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 126.61
Total :126.61
95458 4/5/2007 063890 PERFORMANCE SIGN PRODUCTS INC 42258 STREET - 30" OPAQUE MED BLUE
STREET - 30" OPAQUE MED BLUE
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 86.50
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 7.87
Total :99.37
95459 4/5/2007 007800 PETTY CASH petty cash-tc retirement cake-Stark
35Page:
Packet Page 63 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95459 4/5/2007 (Continued)007800 PETTY CASH
retirement cake-Stark
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 50.00
reimb for breakfast supplies-council
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 50.21
parking for main st conference at
001.000.620.558.600.430.00 22.00
milege reimb-jury duty-Hardie
001.000.220.516.100.430.00 63.06
mileage reimb-Linda Carl
001.000.210.513.100.430.00 32.02
mileage reimb-council retreat-Carl
001.000.210.513.100.430.00 45.69
snohomish county clerks & finance
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00
label maker required new power adapter
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 28.28
assoc of sno cnty city & towns reg
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 35.00
reimburse for council refreshments
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 24.03
coffee and sugar for 2nd floor
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 34.57
assoc of sno cnty city & towns reg fee
001.000.110.511.100.490.00 70.00
2007 council retreat mileage-spellman
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 55.13
flu shot reimb-Todd Smith
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 18.00
SKED storage bag repair
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 21.76
Total :559.75
95460 4/5/2007 029012 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 152848 POSTAGE TO SET COM REPAIR - FLEET
POSTAGE TO SET COM REPAIR - FLEET
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 13.00
36Page:
Packet Page 64 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95460 4/5/2007 (Continued)029012 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE - WATER/SEWER152956
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE - WATER/SEWER
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 3.91
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE - WATER/SEWER
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 3.91
NATIONAL SAFETY POSTAGE - SEWER153195
NATIONAL SAFETY POSTAGE - SEWER
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.00
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE FEES - WATER/SEWER153197
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE FEES - WATER/SEWER
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.42
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE FEES - WATER/SEWER
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 1.41
ERIC REPAIR POSTAGE - SEWER153345
ERIC REPAIR POSTAGE - SEWER
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 7.74
KING SALMON MARINE POSTAGE - FLEET153372
KING SALMON MARINE POSTAGE - FLEET
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 12.39
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE - WATER/SEWER153427
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE - WATER/SEWER
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 4.95
DEPT OF L&I POSTAGE - WATER/SEWER
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 4.94
SET COM REPAIR POSTAGE - FLEET153437
SET COM REPAIR POSTAGE - FLEET
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 13.00
Total :86.67
95461 4/5/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS Pmt 35 E3HB.Services thru 03/09/07
E3HB.Services thru 03/09/07
414.000.656.538.800.410.00 207.35
E2FB.Services thru 03/09/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 213.24
37Page:
Packet Page 65 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :420.59954614/5/2007 029117 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
95462 4/5/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 5924 UNIT M16 - OIL
UNIT M16 - OIL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.58
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.10
UNIT M16 - FASTENERS, FUNNEL5926
UNIT M16 - FASTENERS, FUNNEL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.85
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.17
UNIT M16 - LUBE CORROSION BLOCK, CAP5939
UNIT M16 - LUBE CORROSION BLOCK, CAP
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.16
UNIT M16 - PROP WRENCH, CARTRIDGE6292
UNIT M16 - PROP WRENCH, CARTRIDGE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 128.15
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.41
UNIT M-16 - FASTENERS6803
UNIT M-16 - FASTENERS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.24
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.11
Total :182.75
95463 4/5/2007 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 19387 INV#19387 ORDER # 19457 EDMONDS PD
25 FT XP DUTY CARTRIDGES
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 1,137.50
21 FT NON-CONDUCTIVE SIMULATION ROUNDS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 1,875.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 9.95
38Page:
Packet Page 66 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,022.45954634/5/2007 071594 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT
95464 4/5/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 MCC
24 hour alarm monitoring MCC~
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 96.00
Total :96.00
95465 4/5/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 173.34
Total :173.34
95466 4/5/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
411.000.656.538.800.472.63 1,564.43
Total :1,564.43
95467 4/5/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 353.34
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 408.22
LIFT STATION #71916766007
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 112.80
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 619.34
39Page:
Packet Page 67 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95467 4/5/2007 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
Public Works2776365005
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 62.21
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 236.39
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 236.39
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 236.39
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 236.39
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 236.40
LIFT STATION #132986629000
LIFT STATION #13
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 86.47
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg3689976003
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 489.17
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 310.75
SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009
SEWER LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 26.84
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION6439566008
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,198.41
ANDERSON CENTER6490327001
ANDERSON CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,110.55
LIFT STATION #88851908007
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.79
40Page:
Packet Page 68 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95467 4/5/2007 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
FIRE STATION #209919661109
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 553.97
Total :8,568.82
95468 4/5/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412377938 STREET - ASPHALT
STREET - ASPHALT
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 720.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 63.36
STREET - ASPHALT9412402890
STREET - ASPHALT
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 240.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 21.12
STREET - ASPHALT9412412538
STREET - ASPHALT
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 240.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 21.12
Total :1,305.60
95469 4/5/2007 069879 SALTER JOYCE ZIKER PLLC 10567 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Prof Services 8th & Walnut
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 176.00
Prof Services 5th & Dayton
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 154.00
Total :330.00
95470 4/5/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY SAWDON0331 GYM MONITOR
ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 48.00
Total :48.00
95471 4/5/2007 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 231441 UNIT 89 - GEAR
41Page:
Packet Page 69 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95471 4/5/2007 (Continued)061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET
UNIT 89 - GEAR
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 284.59
CORE FEE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 100.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 34.23
UNIT 89 - SHAFT231502
UNIT 89 - SHAFT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 141.78
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.62
REFUND OF CORE FEE FOR GEAR ON UNIT 89CM231441
REFUND OF CORE FEE FOR GEAR ON UNIT 89
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -100.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -8.90
Total :464.32
95472 4/5/2007 071595 SEE COAST MFG COMPANY INC 5540 SPOTTING SCOPES
SPOTTING SCOPES
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 6,635.00
Freight
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 277.15
Total :6,912.15
95473 4/5/2007 066738 SETCOM CORPORATION 19571 UNIT 124 - REPAIR MATERIAL & LABOR
UNIT 124 - REPAIR MATERIAL & LABOR
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 303.01
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 7.87
UNIT 124 - HELMET KIT79490
UNIT 124 - HELMET KIT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 273.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.19
42Page:
Packet Page 70 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :591.07954734/5/2007 066738 066738 SETCOM CORPORATION
95474 4/5/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0059706-IN UNIT 09 FI - COMPACT SPEAKER, UNIV
UNIT 09 FI - COMPACT SPEAKER, UNIV
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 160.20
UNIT 10 FI - COMPACT SPEAKER, UNIV0059707-IN
UNIT 10 FI - COMPACT SPEAKER, UNIV
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 160.20
Total :320.40
95475 4/5/2007 071602 SME SOLUTIONS LLC Bus Lic Refund OVER PMT OF BUSINESS LICENSE
Refund over pmt of Bus Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
95476 4/5/2007 037801 SNO CO HUMAN SERVICE DEPT I000 168859 Q4-06 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS & TAXES
Q4-06 Liquor Board Profits & Taxes
001.000.390.567.000.510.00 2,172.19
Total :2,172.19
95477 4/5/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3850013073 IRRIGATION CONTROL
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74
UTILITY BILLING4120014156
750 15TH ST SW
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 16.17
SPRINKLER SYSTEM4160017333
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 89.38
Total :135.29
95478 4/5/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2330012283 SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.28
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE2440024129
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 158.43
43Page:
Packet Page 71 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95478 4/5/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER2670022181
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,749.27
SIGNAL LIGHT3710011507
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 52.54
LIFT STATION #123850011440
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 295.71
LIFT STATION #154070022027
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 28.28
LIFT STATION #114130026596
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 37.75
STREET LIGHT4320012174
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 437.08
LOG CABIN5500019350
LOG CABIN
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 370.68
Total :5,158.02
95479 4/5/2007 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 48259 DUMPING FEES
DUMP FEES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 364.86
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 13.14
Total :378.00
95480 4/5/2007 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER Feb 07 crime victims
crime victims
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 540.26
Total :540.26
44Page:
Packet Page 72 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95481 4/5/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC April-07 04/07 Recreation Services Contract Fee
04/07 Recreation Services Contract Fee
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67
Total :4,791.67
95482 4/5/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS
garbage & recycle for PS
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 487.49
garbage & recycle for FAC03585
garbage & recycle for FAC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.90
garbage & recycle for Library03586
garbage & recycle for Library
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 491.20
garbage & recycle-City Hall03588
garbage & recycle-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 379.46
Total :1,915.05
95483 4/5/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2253717-01 UNIFORMS/SEBERS
UNIFORMS/SEBERS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 25.95
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 2.23
Total :28.18
95484 4/5/2007 070677 SPRINT Eng.Mar 2007 Engineering Nextel thru 03/24/07
Engineering Nextel thru 03/24/07
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 540.21
Total :540.21
95485 4/5/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 947329 BAND SHELL - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
BAND SHELL - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 193.84
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.25
45Page:
Packet Page 73 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95485 4/5/2007 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
MILLTOWN STREET PROJECT - ELECTRICAL954720
MILLTOWN STREET PROJECT - ELECTRICAL
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 74.35
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 6.62
FAC MAINT - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES954721
FAC MAINT - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 30.33
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.70
Total :325.09
95486 4/5/2007 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 7961 TELEMETRY SYSTEMS PROF SVCS
TELEMETRY SYSTEMS PROF SVCS
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 27,101.25
TELEMETRY SYSTEM MATERIAL PROCUREMENT7962
TELEMETRY SYSTEM MATERIAL PROCUREMENT
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 18,432.20
Sales Tax
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 1,640.47
Total :47,173.92
95487 4/5/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10484728 STREET - STEEL LAG GALV 5/16X2" SCREWS
STREET - STEEL LAG GALV 5/16X2" SCREWS
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 21.23
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.89
Total :23.12
95488 4/5/2007 071577 TAYLOR, KATHLEEN 3/21-4/2/07 CONSULTANT SERVICES 3/21-4/2/07.
CONSULTANT SERVICES 3/21-4/2/07.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 2,600.00
Total :2,600.00
95489 4/5/2007 069576 THE BANK OF NEW YORK 1154456 ACCT # EDMLTGO07
46Page:
Packet Page 74 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95489 4/5/2007 (Continued)069576 THE BANK OF NEW YORK
Gen Oblign Bonds Series 2007
001.000.390.592.190.840.00 215.34
Total :215.34
95490 4/5/2007 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 12502730 SUBSCRIPTION THROUGH 4/08/2008
Subscription through 4/08/2008
001.000.610.519.700.490.00 141.00
Total :141.00
95491 4/5/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 669691 MUSEUM
monthly elevator maint-museum~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 162.05
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.42
CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE - APRIL669692
CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE - APRIL
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 735.32
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 65.45
MONITORING-PS669693
monitoring-PS - APRIL 07
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 35.15
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING681373
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.57
Total :1,022.96
95492 4/5/2007 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE POSTAGE FOR CITY METER
Postage for City Meter250-00142
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 8,000.00
Total :8,000.00
95493 4/5/2007 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE 11 SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATIONS
MEN'S AND MIXED TEAM REGISTRATIONS
001.000.640.575.520.490.00 1,365.00
47Page:
Packet Page 75 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,365.00954934/5/2007 064214 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE
95494 4/5/2007 071601 UTILX CORPORATION Bus Lic Refund OVER PMT OF BUSINESS LICENSE
Refund over pmt of Bus Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
95495 4/5/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-DHO-0667 DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOCOM
Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom 03/19-
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 350.92
Total :350.92
95496 4/5/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.03
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 269.35
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR425-206-1137
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 31.50
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-1141
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.43
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.22
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-4810
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.17
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.32
LIFT STATION #1425-673-5978
Lift Station #1
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 47.49
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE425-712-8347
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 56.52
48Page:
Packet Page 76 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95496 4/5/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
FS # 16425-771-0158
FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 226.04
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-3896
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 113.69
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST425-778-3297
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 17.81
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 33.06
Total :1,113.63
95497 4/5/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-778-2153 FS #20 PHONE SERVICE
FS #20 PHONE SERVICE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 47.08
FS #16 FRAME RELAY425-FLO-0017
FS #16 FRAME RELAY
001.000.510.528.600.420.00 354.94
Total :402.02
95498 4/5/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2126209657 CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION
CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 2.97
Total :2.97
95499 4/5/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2123645144 Aircard charges 2/19-3/18/07 Bldg. Dept.
Aircard charges 2/19-3/18/07 Bldg. Dept.
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 60.03
Total :60.03
95500 4/5/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2125553073 INV#2125553073 ACCT#470497482-00001
CELL PHONES 03/24-4/23/07
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 122.60
Total :122.60
49Page:
Packet Page 77 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95501 4/5/2007 063903 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA 2428 FREIGHT - SHIPPING & HANDLING ON BOOKS
Freight
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 6.00
Total :6.00
95502 4/5/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 29840391 1066294
DISHWASHER SOAP
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 46.69
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 5.65
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 4.65
Total :56.99
95503 4/5/2007 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-5585 STREET - DOWN DEAD PINE TREE AT 808
STREET - DOWN DEAD PINE TREE AT 808
111.000.653.542.710.410.00 240.00
Total :240.00
95504 4/5/2007 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 813352177 CODE UPDATES
RCW Updates
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 563.52
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 50.15
Total :613.67
95505 4/5/2007 065535 WESTERN FACILITIES SUPPLY 306623-00 INV#306623-00 CUST#701480 EDMONDS PD
50Page:
Packet Page 78 of 396
04/05/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
4:41:55PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95505 4/5/2007 (Continued)065535 WESTERN FACILITIES SUPPLY
86G #75 DOUBLE STRENGTH BAGS
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 53.59
CASE OF 2 PLY RECEIPT TAPE
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 48.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 3.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 4.48
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 4.26
Total :113.33
95506 4/5/2007 065869 WSNLA EDHOUSE/NOE ANNUAL CPH FEES
ANNUAL CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
95507 4/5/2007 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 185 UMPIRING
UMPIRING OF LEAGUE GAMES
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 644.00
Total :644.00
Bank total :377,063.39163 Vouchers for bank code :front
377,063.39Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report163
51Page:
Packet Page 79 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95508 4/12/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 238970 RODENT CONTROL
CITY RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 73.50
Total :73.50
95509 4/12/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070331 INV#1201641-20070331 EDMONDS PD
SEARCHES & REPORTS 03/07
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 30.25
Total :30.25
95510 4/12/2007 068188 ADAMS, MIKE 2007 BOOTS 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE - M ADAMS
2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE - M ADAMS
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 164.00
Total :164.00
95511 4/12/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8230 MARCH 2007 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER
MARCH 2007 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER
411.000.654.534.800.340.00 84,059.18
Total :84,059.18
95512 4/12/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 110425086 FLEET SHOP INVENTORY - BATTERIES
FLEET SHOP INVENTORY - BATTERIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 231.80
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.63
FLEET INVENTORY - BATTERIES110425087
FLEET INVENTORY - BATTERIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 79.95
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.12
Total :339.50
95513 4/12/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3851803 UNIFORM SERVICES
1Page:
Packet Page 80 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95513 4/12/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.36
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.70
Total :33.06
95514 4/12/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3851805 18386001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.93
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.65
Total :93.58
95515 4/12/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3850510 FLEET - UNIFORM SVC
FLEET - UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55
2Page:
Packet Page 81 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95515 4/12/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS512-3850511
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26
WATER UNIFORM SVC
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-3851804
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
3Page:
Packet Page 82 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :94.41955154/12/2007 069751 069751 ARAMARK
95516 4/12/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 556665 FLEET - DIESEL 156 GAL
FLEET - DIESEL 156 GAL
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 335.64
WA ST SERVICE FEE
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 60.00
ST EXCISE DIESEL TAX, WA OIL SPILL
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 55.89
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4.80
Total :456.33
95517 4/12/2007 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM
PARKS FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 30.60
Total :30.60
95518 4/12/2007 065712 ATLAS SUPPLY S1+0068817 SUPPLIES
SIKAFLEX
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.39
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.22
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.46
Total :18.07
95519 4/12/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 39963 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
4Page:
Packet Page 83 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95519 4/12/2007 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #300 PRINTING
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 149.79
UB Outsourcing area #300 PRINTING
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.79
UB Outsourcing area #300 PRINTING
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 150.25
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 13.18
UB Outsourcing area #300 POSTAGE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 418.86
UB Outsourcing area #300 POSTAGE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 418.85
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 13.18
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 13.23
Total :1,327.13
95520 4/12/2007 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 06-3231 & 06-3423 BURIAL SUPPLIES
BURIAL SUPPLIES: POPE
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00
BURIAL SUPPLIES: CAMPBELL
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00
Total :716.00
95521 4/12/2007 071581 AVIDEX INDUSTRIES LLC I025224 INV#I025224 CUST#EDM003 EDMONDS PD
PANAVISE 827-06 CEILING MOUNT
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 27.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 10.75
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 3.36
Total :41.11
95522 4/12/2007 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 66882 BADGES
5Page:
Packet Page 84 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95522 4/12/2007 (Continued)001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC
BADGES
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 17.50
Freight
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 2.63
Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 1.80
Total :21.93
95523 4/12/2007 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0307 Background check
Background check
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 10.00
Total :10.00
95524 4/12/2007 069221 BAILEY, ADAM MARCH 2007 A MEALS REIMBURSE FOR WETRC CONF - A
MEALS REIMBURSE FOR WETRC CONF - A
411.000.655.535.800.430.00 81.37
Total :81.37
95525 4/12/2007 002070 BALANCING SERVICE CO INC 9933 BALANCE/PUMP & SHAFT
BALANCE/PUMP & SHAFT
411.000.656.538.800.410.21 225.00
Total :225.00
95526 4/12/2007 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2006309 INV#2006309 EDMONDS PD - HOVORKA
PRE-EMPLOY. SCREEN - HOVORKA
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 175.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 6.00
Total :181.00
95527 4/12/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9538536 COPIER RENTAL FEE
COPIER RENTAL FEE
001.000.230.512.500.450.00 153.55
Total :153.55
95528 4/12/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9538537 Canon 5870 copier lease (5/1 -5/31/07)
6Page:
Packet Page 85 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95528 4/12/2007 (Continued)070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING
Canon 5870 copier lease (5/1 -5/31/07)
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35
Canon 5870 copier lease (5/1 -5/31/07)
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32
Canon 5870 copier lease (5/1 -5/31/07)
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33
Canon 5870 copier supply charge (5/1 -
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01
Canon 5870 copier supply charge (5/1 -
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00
Canon 5870 copier supply charge (5/1 -
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99
Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 11.25
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 11.25
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.25
Total :412.75
95529 4/12/2007 071603 BELZONA WASHINGTON INC 7345 C-248 PROTECTIVE COATING
C-248 PROTECTIVE COATING
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,690.00
Freight
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 12.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 149.78
Total :1,851.78
95530 4/12/2007 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS 717 E5GA.Services thru 03/16/07
E5GA.Services thru 03/16/07
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 3,098.37
Total :3,098.37
95531 4/12/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 562464 INV#562464 EDMONDS PD - PAULSON
7Page:
Packet Page 86 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95531 4/12/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
BALLISTIC VEST
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 649.95
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 57.20
INV#563191 EDMONDS PD - UNIFORM COMM.563191
COMMENDATION BAR SLIDE HOLDER
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.80
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.42
INV#576653 EDMONDS PD - TONY COLLINS576653
ACADEMY T-SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 17.90
ACADEMY SWEATSHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 28.30
LETTERS ON ACADEMY SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 40.00
ACADEMY SWEATPANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 31.44
ACADEMY SHORTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 23.96
ACADEMY SHIRTS W/SEWN CREASES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 56.30
ACADEMY PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.90
UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 320.85
L/S UNIFORM SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 290.85
SEW ON BUTTONS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 10.00
SHORT SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 179.85
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 91.99
8Page:
Packet Page 87 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95531 4/12/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#576854 EDMONDS PD - GREENMUN576854
REMOVE STARS FROM JACKET
001.000.410.521.310.240.00 4.00
SERVICE STARS/STRIPS
001.000.410.521.310.240.00 10.00
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.310.240.00 1.23
INV#577503-01 EDMONDS PD - BLACKBURN577503-01
MIDNIGHT PLUS UNIFORM BOOT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.95
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.04
INV#577548 EDMONDS PD - COMPTON577548
TACTICAL BATON
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 80.00
ASP CASE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 34.00
TRAFFIC TEMPLATE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.95
DOUBLE HANDCUFF CASE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 42.95
CAP COVER
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 6.50
DUTY BELT AND BELT KEEPERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 82.20
HAND WEIGHT TRAINER
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.95
BLACK GEAR BAG
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.95
ATAC LOW BOOTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.99
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 33.66
9Page:
Packet Page 88 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95531 4/12/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#578555 EDMONDS PD - COMPTON578555
UNIFORM TROUSERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 320.85
SHORT SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 119.90
LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.95
BELT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95
TIES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.90
METAL BUTTONS - 2 SETS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 14.00
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 49.33
Total :2,977.96
95532 4/12/2007 071606 BOARD OF INDUSTRIAL APPEALS0406 REFUND
REFUNDING CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
95533 4/12/2007 069075 CAREERTRACK 9342733 ROD SEBERS
TRAINING/SEBERS
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 349.00
Total :349.00
95534 4/12/2007 071612 CARPORTS OF WASHINGTON INC Bus Lic Ref OVERPMT OF BUSINESS LICENSE
Refund overpmt of Business License
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
95535 4/12/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY105229 SUPPLIES
10Page:
Packet Page 89 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95535 4/12/2007 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
HELIUM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 120.74
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.74
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIESRN03071009
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BIRTHDAY PARTY
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 7.75
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.69
Total :139.92
95536 4/12/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN03071011 2954000
ARGON/NITROGEN/OXYGEN
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 31.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.76
Total :33.76
95537 4/12/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN03071007 FLEET- CYLINDER RENTAL
FLEET- CYLINDER RENTAL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.75
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.69
WATER- CYLINDER RENTALRN03071012
WATER- CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 31.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.76
Total :42.20
95538 4/12/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY105330 ALS SUPPLIES
11Page:
Packet Page 90 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95538 4/12/2007 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 19.23
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.91
ALS SUPPLIESLY105331
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 48.07
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.47
ALS SUPPLIESLY105332
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 28.84
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.76
ALS SUPPLIESRN03071008
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.450.00 15.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.450.00 1.38
Total :165.66
95539 4/12/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 150421551 150421551X04042007
425.418.8755 Service 2/28-3/27/07
001.000.310.514.100.420.00 113.06
Total :113.06
95540 4/12/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 871964442 871964442
PLANT CELL PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 16.76
12Page:
Packet Page 91 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :16.76955404/12/2007 064341 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS
95541 4/12/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 3X04052007 OPERATIONS WIRELESS
vehicles' wireless
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 90.94
Total :90.94
95542 4/12/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460598231 UNIFORMS
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPS UNIFORMS460598232
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51
UNIFORMS460599306
Stn 17-ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 101.09
Stn 17-Ops
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 101.09
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.99
UNIFORMS460599326
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03
Total :521.98
95543 4/12/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5262 INV#5262 CUST#47 EDMONDS PD
PRISONER R&B MARCH 2007
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,193.75
13Page:
Packet Page 92 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :5,193.75955434/12/2007 019215 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
95544 4/12/2007 065519 CITY OF LYNNWOOD #1-2007 REIMBURSEMENT OF NARC FUND/EDMONDS
1ST PAYMENT 2007
104.000.410.521.210.490.00 5,000.00
Total :5,000.00
95545 4/12/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 MARCH 07 WATER USAGE
MARCH 07 WATER USAGE
411.000.654.534.800.340.00 435.00
Total :435.00
95546 4/12/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1767384 CLEANING SUPPLIES
PAPER TOWELS, LINERS, BLEACH, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 756.90
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 66.61
SUPPLIESW1767384-1
BRAWNY WIPERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 65.33
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.75
Total :894.59
95547 4/12/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1764253-1 FAC MAINT - DRY FLOOR TOOL
FAC MAINT - DRY FLOOR TOOL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 85.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.48
FAC MAINT - CITY SUPPLIES - TTW1766315
FAC MAINT - CITY SUPPLIES - TT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 116.52
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.47
14Page:
Packet Page 93 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95547 4/12/2007 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES
FAC MAINT - ADMIRAL 8 GAL EXTRACTORW1769537
FAC MAINT - ADMIRAL 8 GAL EXTRACTOR
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 2,442.68
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 215.18
FAC MAINT - ROLL TOWELS, LAUNDRY SOAPW1770198
FAC MAINT - ROLL TOWELS, LAUNDRY SOAP
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 431.84
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 38.22
Total :3,354.89
95548 4/12/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1771981 OPS SUPPLIES
stations' cleaning supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 143.15
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 12.82
Total :158.47
95549 4/12/2007 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0416 BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER
BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER @ EDMONDS CC~
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 81.00
Total :81.00
95550 4/12/2007 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-8129 UNIT 489 - NEW 2008 FORD F-250 PICKUP
15Page:
Packet Page 94 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95550 4/12/2007 (Continued)069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC
UNIT 489 - NEW 2008 FORD F-250 PICKUP
511.200.657.594.480.640.00 24,396.00
Sales Tax
511.200.657.594.480.640.00 1,951.68
Early pmt discount3-8129
Early pmt discount
511.200.657.594.480.640.00 -200.00
Total :26,147.68
95551 4/12/2007 068190 DATEC INC 101990 UNIT M17 - RADIO SWIVEL ADAPTER, DOCK,
UNIT M17 - RADIO SWIVEL ADAPTER, DOCK,
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 124.00
Freight
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 9.95
Sales Tax
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 11.79
Total :145.74
95552 4/12/2007 070945 DAWSON, DEANNA 3-23-07 Dawson CR Mileage Council Retreat 2007 LaConner
Mileage Council Retreat 2007 LaConner
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 55.13
Total :55.13
95553 4/12/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 37851 6 VHF MOBILE UNITS, PROGRAMMING,
6 VHF MOBILE UNITS, PROGRAMMING,
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 2,858.00
Freight
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 27.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 256.77
Total :3,141.77
95554 4/12/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 135092 INV#135092 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD
16Page:
Packet Page 95 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95554 4/12/2007 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
CALIBRATE RADAR KE01579
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#38104 EDMONDS POLICE DEPT.38104
EARPHONE KIT HT1000 SERIES
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 32.00
FLEXIBLE EARPIECES, M & L
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 30.76
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 5.59
INV#709503 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD709503
REPAIR & CALIBRATE RADAR GVP1834
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 112.50
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 9.69
Total :277.66
95555 4/12/2007 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING Monthly STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOL
State Share of Concealed Pistol
001.000.000.237.190.000.00 330.00
Total :330.00
95556 4/12/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2740 MINUTE TAKING
Retreat & 4/3/07 Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 560.00
Total :560.00
95557 4/12/2007 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 202350 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 83.91
INTERPRETER FEE202351
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 63.91
17Page:
Packet Page 96 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :147.82955574/12/2007 060933 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER
95558 4/12/2007 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2007178 Prof Serv Bldg Division 2007-0140,
Prof Serv Bldg Division 2007-0140,
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 7,685.62
Total :7,685.62
95559 4/12/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 78566 SUPPLIES
UNDERCOAT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.22
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.53
SUPPLIES78586
ANTI FREEZE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.99
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.62
Total :26.36
95560 4/12/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 10107 UPS/COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL/ANALYSIS PLUS
UPS/COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL/ANALYSIS PLUS
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 19.43
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 1.73
Total :21.16
95561 4/12/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 151627 INV#151627 CLIENT#3713 EDMONDS AC
IMP#6856 - MEDICAL EXAM
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 37.60
IMP#6856 - APPLY BANDAGE
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 15.60
18Page:
Packet Page 97 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95561 4/12/2007 (Continued)008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL
INV#152106 CLIENT#3713 EDMONDS AC152106
IMP#6850 - INSULIN
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 36.80
IMP#6850 PHOENIX FRUCTOSAMINE
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 63.00
IMP#6850 - EXAM FOR MED. PROBLEM
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 37.60
GLUCOSE ACCU-CHEK
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 21.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 3.65
Total :215.25
95562 4/12/2007 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 97415 INV#97415 CLIENT #5118 EDMONDS PD
CASTRATE FELINE #6770
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75
Total :44.75
95563 4/12/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 023892 COPIER MAINT
COPIER MAINT
001.000.230.512.500.480.00 36.20
Total :36.20
95564 4/12/2007 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0028180-IN INV#0028180-IN ACCT#0011847 EDMONDS PD
REFURBISH BADGE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 60.00
REFURBISH 4 SECURITY BADGES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 216.00
HANDLING CHANGE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.50
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.49
Total :287.99
95565 4/12/2007 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A Mar-07 03/07 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
19Page:
Packet Page 98 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95565 4/12/2007 (Continued)009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A
03/07 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 8,990.00
Total :8,990.00
95566 4/12/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 92850 March 2007 Sec. 125 & 132 plan fees
March 2007 Sec. 125 & 132 plan fees
811.000.000.231.590.000.00 52.03
March 2007 Sec. 125 & 132 plan fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 35.67
Total :87.70
95567 4/12/2007 070011 FORD, JAY 04/03/07 Tuition Reimbursement - 1/2/07 - 3/16/07
Tuition Reimbursement - 1/2/07 - 3/16/07
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 387.00
Total :387.00
95568 4/12/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 28693 STREET - CEMENT
STREET - CEMENT
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 294.30
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 25.89
Total :320.19
95569 4/12/2007 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA GLEISNER7616 TAIJIQUAN CLASSES
TAIJIQUAN #7616
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 94.50
QIGONG #7963
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 141.75
Total :236.25
95570 4/12/2007 061410 GRCC/WETRC 2879 3 REGISTRATIONS FOR WWW OPERATION
3 REGISTRATIONS FOR WWW OPERATION
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 510.00
Total :510.00
95571 4/12/2007 071613 GUERNSEY-OSTERGARD INC Bus Lic Ref OVERPMT OF BUSINESS LICENSE
20Page:
Packet Page 99 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95571 4/12/2007 (Continued)071613 GUERNSEY-OSTERGARD INC
Refund overpmt of Business License
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
95572 4/12/2007 062831 HARRIS, TIM MARCH 2007 C MEALS REIMBRUSE FOR WETRC CONF - T
MEALS REIMBRUSE FOR WETRC CONF - T
411.000.655.535.800.430.00 78.29
Total :78.29
95573 4/12/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1039957 PS - COURT RM STEPS - PLYWOOD, 2X8,
PS - COURT RM STEPS - PLYWOOD, 2X8,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 70.55
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.21
PS - INTERVIEW ROOM - 4X8 PANELS,1045697
PS - INTERVIEW ROOM - 4X8 PANELS,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.46
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.86
FAC DAYCARE - CORNER BRACE1046690
FAC DAYCARE - CORNER BRACE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.78
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.33
PS - COURT STEPS - LAFARGE PORTS1047658
PS - COURT STEPS - LAFARGE PORTS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 42.35
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.73
FAC MAINT - INSTANT ADHESIVE1083463
FAC MAINT - INSTANT ADHESIVE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.05
21Page:
Packet Page 100 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95573 4/12/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
PS - COVE BASE INSTALLATION - POWER GRAB2036779
PS - COVE BASE INSTALLATION - POWER GRAB
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.82
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.15
PS - TRASHBAGS, EYE BOLTS, BITS2046590
PS - TRASHBAGS, EYE BOLTS, BITS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.48
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.63
FAC - LYSOL WIPES2077987
FAC - LYSOL WIPES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.98
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.61
FS 17 - ADHESIVE2096657
FS 17 - ADHESIVE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.79
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.25
SEWER - COPPER TAPE FOR FERNCO'S3046465
SEWER - COPPER TAPE FOR FERNCO'S
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.90
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.31
CITY HALL - SOCKET3564473
CITY HALL - SOCKET
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.28
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.29
BAND SHELL - REPAIR SUPPLIES4046398
BAND SHELL - REPAIR SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 25.06
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.21
22Page:
Packet Page 101 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95573 4/12/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
CITY PARK BLDG - SLIDE DOR BTM, BONDO,4047347
CITY PARK BLDG - SLIDE DOR BTM, BONDO,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.76
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.15
LIBRARY - ROPE REEL4096394
LIBRARY - ROPE REEL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.25
BOYS&GIRLS CLUB- PIPE SUPPLIES4096426
BOYS&GIRLS CLUB- PIPE SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.56
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.63
PS - LIQUID NAILS, SUPPLIES5036396
PS - LIQUID NAILS, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.30
SEWER - GRASS SEED FOR LIFT STATIONS5068291
SEWER - GRASS SEED FOR LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.49
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.66
Ladder IT Dept575313
Ladder IT Dept
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 64.79
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 5.70
BAND SHELL - SUPPLIES6039261
BAND SHELL - SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 55.32
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.87
23Page:
Packet Page 102 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95573 4/12/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
PS - LIQUID NAILS, TROWEL, SILICONE7029396
PS - LIQUID NAILS, TROWEL, SILICONE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 152.72
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.59
FAC - BATTERIES, DUCT TAPE, SUPPLIES7076652
FAC - BATTERIES, DUCT TAPE, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.73
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.47
PS - RETURNED LIQUID NAILS FOR CREDIT7240776
PS - RETURNED LIQUID NAILS FOR CREDIT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -91.94
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -8.09
PS - LIQUID NAILS8035877
PS - LIQUID NAILS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 91.94
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.09
WATER/SEWER - HOSE, GRASS, STARTER8068607
WATER/SEWER - HOSE, GRASS, STARTER
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 69.03
WATER/SEWER - HOSE, GRASS, STARTER
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 69.03
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.08
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.07
SR CENTER - FITTINGS, BOLTS, WAX RING,83489
SR CENTER - FITTINGS, BOLTS, WAX RING,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 28.36
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
24Page:
Packet Page 103 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :911.78955734/12/2007 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
95574 4/12/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9610020 6035322501434934
RS1 Training supplies
001.000.510.522.400.310.00 274.12
Total :274.12
95575 4/12/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 47771 6035322501434934
Stn. 20 supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 101.08
Total :101.08
95576 4/12/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17607 E5JA.Testing thru 03/31/07
E5JA.Testing thru 03/31/07
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 3,200.44
Total :3,200.44
95577 4/12/2007 071609 I-DEAL LLC 10011265 Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
001.000.390.592.190.840.00 216.75
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
126.000.390.592.190.840.00 97.59
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
111.000.653.592.420.840.00 16.79
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
414.000.656.592.380.840.00 487.98
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
411.000.652.592.380.840.00 410.69
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
411.000.654.592.340.840.00 11.22
Electronic Distrib for $5.23 M GO Bond
411.000.655.592.350.840.00 8.98
25Page:
Packet Page 104 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95577 4/12/2007 (Continued)071609 I-DEAL LLC
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue10011353
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
001.000.390.592.190.840.00 277.97
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
126.000.390.592.190.840.00 125.16
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
111.000.653.592.420.840.00 21.53
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
414.000.656.592.380.840.00 625.81
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
411.000.652.592.380.840.00 526.69
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
411.000.654.592.340.840.00 14.39
Printing Serv $5.23 M GO Bond Issue
411.000.655.592.350.840.00 11.52
Total :2,853.07
95578 4/12/2007 060511 I-R EQUIPMENT & SERVICE 572-22649 UNIT 137 - 80X80 FILTER, PRI ELEMENT
UNIT 137 - 80X80 FILTER, PRI ELEMENT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 67.09
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.52
Total :80.59
95579 4/12/2007 070097 INLAND TECHNOLOGY INC 62933 20170
DEGREASER
411.000.656.538.800.310.59 1,128.75
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.59 87.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.59 106.99
Total :1,322.74
26Page:
Packet Page 105 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95580 4/12/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 75331 OPS UNIFORMS
Warren coat/nametag
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 245.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 21.81
OPS UNIFORM75992
Fischer nametag
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 5.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 0.49
OPS UNIFORMS76091
Yoakum coat/pant etc.
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 373.20
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 33.21
OPS UNIFORMS76411
Krugmire boots
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 99.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.76
Total :787.47
95581 4/12/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1009381936 STREET - PVC GLOVE - BLACK KNIGHT - 10
STREET - PVC GLOVE - BLACK KNIGHT - 10
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 169.50
Freight
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 31.49
Total :200.99
95582 4/12/2007 063462 LACONNER COUNTRY INN CE LaConner Country Accommodations LaConner 2007 Retreat~
Accommodations LaConner 2007 Retreat~
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 2,213.40
Total :2,213.40
95583 4/12/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0020812 Shubin ESLHA Review 07-01
27Page:
Packet Page 106 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95583 4/12/2007 (Continued)017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
Shubin ESLHA Review 07-01
001.000.000.245.900.621.00 500.00
Shubin ESLHA Review 07-02.1
001.000.000.245.900.621.00 323.75
Total :823.75
95584 4/12/2007 069594 LINK PIPE INC 4884 SEWER - LINK PIPES
SEWER - LINK PIPES
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3,641.94
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 133.40
Total :3,775.34
95585 4/12/2007 068694 LONG, SOKHOM MARCH 2007 B Meals & mileage Reimb WETRC Conf 3/20
Meals & mileage Reimb WETRC Conf 3/20
411.000.655.535.800.430.00 213.28
Total :213.28
95586 4/12/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093582 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 62.29
SUPPLIES093671
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 232.98
SUPPLIES093752
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 48.99
SUPPLIES093790
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 23.40
Total :367.66
95587 4/12/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 093950 BUSINESS CARDS EXEC IT PD PW
28Page:
Packet Page 107 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95587 4/12/2007 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
Business Cards:~250-00141
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 16.00
Robby Danninger250-00141
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 16.00
Michelle Poff250-00141
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.00
Josh McClure250-00141
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.00
Anthony J. Collins250-00141
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.00
Kim Karas250-00141
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 16.00
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 1.42
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1.42
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 4.27
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.43
Total :104.54
95588 4/12/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 516646 UNIT 476 - SWITCH
UNIT 476 - SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.45
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.22
UNIT 476 - SWITCH516695
UNIT 476 - SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.45
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.22
Total :5.34
95589 4/12/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 560205 MOWER
29Page:
Packet Page 108 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95589 4/12/2007 (Continued)018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA
MOWER
001.000.640.576.800.350.00 1,050.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.350.00 93.45
Total :1,143.45
95590 4/12/2007 071140 MAD SCIENCE MADSCIENCE7661 MAD SCIENCE CAMP
MAD SCIENCE CAMP #7661
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,300.00
Total :1,300.00
95591 4/12/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 2946 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER FEE2947
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 105.00
INTERPRETER FEE2948
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 105.00
INTERPRETER FEE2954
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER FEE2956
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER FEE2962
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 105.00
INTERPRETER FEE2963
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER FEE2964
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
30Page:
Packet Page 109 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :540.00955914/12/2007 069362 069362 MARSHALL, CITA
95592 4/12/2007 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 43074 SUPPLIES FOR CEMETERY
MINI VAC, NET SKIM, VAC POLE
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 48.97
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 4.36
Total :53.33
95593 4/12/2007 071600 MAWBEY, CAROLYN MAWBEY0403 REFUND
REFUND FOR COURSE
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 17.00
Total :17.00
95594 4/12/2007 070028 MCA 050707 LEYDA-CONWAY, SHERRIE REG 2007 MCA CONF
S Leyda-Conway Registration 2007 MCA
001.000.230.512.501.490.00 110.00
Total :110.00
95595 4/12/2007 070028 MCA 123107 LEYDA-CONWAY, SHERRIE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
Membership Renewal S Leyda Conway
001.000.230.512.501.490.00 25.00
Total :25.00
95596 4/12/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 61984930 123106800
USA FLAG/STEEL BAND
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 108.33
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.98
12310680062018664
PIPE TAP
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 62.48
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.29
31Page:
Packet Page 110 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95596 4/12/2007 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
12310680062108815
CALIBRATION ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 186.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.72
12310680062239915
PIPE FITTING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 -211.14
12310680062289375
HOSE BANDING/WIRE ROPE/HINGE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 289.91
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.13
12310680062349100
SPANNER WRENCH
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 28.06
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.72
Total :493.48
95597 4/12/2007 071607 MECSTAT LABORATORIES 07D0612 INV#07D0612 - EDMONDS POLICE
INTERPRETIVE MEMO
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 150.00
Total :150.00
95598 4/12/2007 069592 METROCALL Q0298897C INV#Q0298897C ACCT#0298897-0 EDMONDS PD
PAGER SERVICE 03/27-04/26/07
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 79.86
Total :79.86
95599 4/12/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 42775 PS - RENTAL DIAMOND HOLE SAW FOR HAND
PS - RENTAL DIAMOND HOLE SAW FOR HAND
001.000.651.519.920.450.00 35.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.450.00 3.12
32Page:
Packet Page 111 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :38.12955994/12/2007 020900 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
95600 4/12/2007 068662 MINNIHAN, TERRY 39 LEOFF I Reimbursement
LEOFF I Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 382.90
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 150.00
Total :532.90
95601 4/12/2007 068992 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS 40223 E2FC.Services thru 02/24/07
E2FC.Services thru 02/24/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 4,395.75
Total :4,395.75
95602 4/12/2007 071567 NAKATA, NIKKI SNOCOSOCCER0315 REFUND-LIGHTS
REFUND DUE TO MALFUNCTIONING FIELD
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 24.00
Total :24.00
95603 4/12/2007 064348 NEWARK IN ONE 14044624 UNIT M-16 - LED PANEL INDICATORS, LED
UNIT M-16 - LED PANEL INDICATORS, LED
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 97.90
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.70
Total :106.60
95604 4/12/2007 023800 NFPA 4T-350-1A OPS MISC
MC Mbrshp
001.000.510.522.200.490.00 150.00
Total :150.00
95605 4/12/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1405569.001 2091
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 283.80
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 24.41
33Page:
Packet Page 112 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :308.21956054/12/2007 024960 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY
95606 4/12/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0077745 SODIUM BISULFITE
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 535.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 47.66
Total :583.16
95607 4/12/2007 070045 NORTHUP GROUP 1389 INV#1389 - EDMONDS PD
03/07 PRE-EMPLOY EVAL
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 600.00
Total :600.00
95608 4/12/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0449256 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 138.02
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0450744
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 95.36
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0452595
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02
Total :331.40
95609 4/12/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 800439 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 11.73
SUPPLIES883954
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 251.48
Total :263.21
95610 4/12/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 598758 OFFICE SUPPLIES
34Page:
Packet Page 113 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95610 4/12/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
INKJET CARTRIDGE, TONER, ETC.
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 137.68
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 12.12
OFFICE SUPPLIES652344
ERASERS, CORKBOARD
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 33.85
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.89
OFFICE SUPPLIES675560
POST ITS, LEGAL PADS, PAPER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 125.88
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.07
OFFICE SUPPLIES691522
COLOR INKJET PAPER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 74.30
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 6.54
OFFICE SUPPLIES692688
CYAN INK CARTRIDGES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 27.26
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.32
Total :433.91
95611 4/12/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 948105 520437
FRAME/COPIER PAPER/CALCULATOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 61.55
King County Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 5.42
35Page:
Packet Page 114 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95611 4/12/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
520437966220
MARKERS
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 7.68
King County Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 0.68
Total :75.33
95612 4/12/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 11225982 OFFICE MAX PRINT & DOCUMENTS SERVICES
Printing Retention Schedules
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 149.52
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 13.31
Total :162.83
95613 4/12/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 008164 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 148.54
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 13.22
Total :161.76
95614 4/12/2007 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 657472 MARCH 07 ATTORNEY SERVICES
March 07 Attorney Services
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 20,310.08
MARCH 07 RETAINER FEES657474
March 07 Retainer Fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 12,364.50
Total :32,674.58
95615 4/12/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 SEWER/WATER
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 192.30
Total :192.30
95616 4/12/2007 070949 ORVIS, DAVID J 3/23/07 Orvis CR Mileage 2007 Council Retreat LaConner
36Page:
Packet Page 115 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95616 4/12/2007 (Continued)070949 ORVIS, DAVID J
Mileage 2007 Council Retreat LaConner
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 55.13
Total :55.13
95617 4/12/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00045441 UNIT 31 - OUTER TUBE WELD, AIR SEAL,
UNIT 31 - OUTER TUBE WELD, AIR SEAL,
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 977.03
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 92.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 94.08
Total :1,163.11
95618 4/12/2007 027280 PATRICKS PRINTING 34978 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 163.65
COURT SUPPLIES35076
COURT SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 292.57
Total :456.22
95619 4/12/2007 068101 PERFORMANCE POWER CONCEPTS MB030708 POWERWARE/UPS SYSTEM
POWERWARE/UPS SYSTEM
411.000.656.538.800.350.00 4,376.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.350.00 196.53
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.350.00 402.38
Total :4,974.91
95620 4/12/2007 069690 PERFORMANCE RADIATOR 222375 UNIT 70 - RDT
UNIT 70 - RDT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 115.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.24
37Page:
Packet Page 116 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95620 4/12/2007 (Continued)069690 PERFORMANCE RADIATOR
UNIT 68 - RADIATOR RECORE SUPPLIES249541
UNIT 68 - RADIATOR RECORE SUPPLIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 575.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.18
Total :751.42
95621 4/12/2007 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 22036.000042 E1BA.Thru 04/01/07-Street/OVWSD
E1BA.Thru 04/01/07-Street/OVWSD
112.506.630.595.330.650.00 2,377.08
E1BA.Thru 04/01/07-Water
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 49.34
E1BA.Thru 04/01/07-Storm
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 275.69
E1BA.Thru 04/01/07-Sewer
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 15.08
Total :2,717.19
95622 4/12/2007 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC PCASH0409 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
38Page:
Packet Page 117 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95622 4/12/2007 (Continued)008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC
SUPPLIES FOR SISTER CITY ORIENTATION
623.200.210.557.210.310.00 13.06
DISCOVERY PROGRAM MILEAGE
001.000.640.574.350.430.00 6.79
DISCOVERY PROGRAM - BIRDING TRAIL MAP
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 5.00
PAINT FOR CITY PARK BANDSHELL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 35.01
EGG HUNT SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 2.81
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES:~
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 15.84
PARKING FOR WORKSHOP MEETING
001.000.640.574.200.430.00 2.00
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 11.42
PRESCHOOL PHOTO DEVELOPMENT
001.000.640.575.560.490.00 6.39
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICE
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 14.40
DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES:~
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 24.32
GYMNASTICS CLEANING SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 27.94
DISCOVERY PROGRAM SPRING BREAK CAMP
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 6.19
PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 21.83
PRESCHOOL EASTER SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 1.09
PRESCHOOL PICTURE DEVELOPMENT
001.000.640.575.560.490.00 8.46
HAY FOR EASTER EGG HUNT
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 9.76
39Page:
Packet Page 118 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95622 4/12/2007 (Continued)008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC
CDL PERMIT FEE: JANICE NOE
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 30.00
Total :242.31
95623 4/12/2007 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0982495 2196
RELAY
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 16.58
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 4.56
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1.82
Total :22.96
95624 4/12/2007 070950 PLUNKETT, MICHAEL 3/23/07 Plunkett CR Mileage 2007 Council Retreat LaConner
Mileage 2007 Council Retreat LaConner
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 55.13
Total :55.13
95625 4/12/2007 029012 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 152789 PEEK CORP POSTAGE - STREET ~
PEEK CORP POSTAGE - STREET ~
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 39.28
Total :39.28
95626 4/12/2007 070979 PRECISION EARTHWORKS, INC E5MD.Final Pmt E5MD.Skatepark Final Pmt
E5MD.Skatepark Final Pmt
132.000.640.594.760.650.00 134,583.74
Total :134,583.74
95627 4/12/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL
24 hour alarm monitoring-CH
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00
Total :35.00
95628 4/12/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 5322323139 Fire Station # 16
Fire Station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,136.39
40Page:
Packet Page 119 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,136.39956284/12/2007 046900 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
95629 4/12/2007 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 07-175 COURT SECURITY OFFICER
COURT SECURITY OFFICER
001.000.230.512.500.410.00 1,460.00
Total :1,460.00
95630 4/12/2007 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 46980 UNIT 716 - TOWING
UNIT 716 - TOWING
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 124.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 11.04
Total :135.04
95631 4/12/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412438439 STORM - ASPHALT
STORM - ASPHALT
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 399.10
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 34.32
Total :433.42
95632 4/12/2007 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 1071 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 125.00
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE1072
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 125.00
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE1076
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 125.00
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE1078
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 125.00
Total :500.00
95633 4/12/2007 071490 RYBICKI, DANIEL J 040707 ALS PROF SERV
41Page:
Packet Page 120 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95633 4/12/2007 (Continued)071490 RYBICKI, DANIEL J
Assessment
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 250.00
Total :250.00
95634 4/12/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 70014 INV#04/04/07 EDMONDS ANIMAL CONTROL
2/26 - PICK UP 3 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 29.25
3/5 - PICK UP 2 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 19.50
3/12 - PICK UP 1 ANIMAL CARCASS
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 9.75
3/19 - PICK UP 4 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 39.00
3/26 - PICK UP 2 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 19.50
Total :117.00
95635 4/12/2007 071096 SAMMAMISH PLATEAU WATER &2007-7041 C-248 BIOXIDE
C-248 BIOXIDE
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 752.50
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 56.98
Total :809.48
95636 4/12/2007 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 577536 INV#577536 CUST#0001733 EDMONDS PD
S&W MP40 BLUEGUNS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 214.50
Freight
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 6.75
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 19.70
Total :240.95
95637 4/12/2007 068864 SANKEI TRAVEL OF AMERICAS INC 333985 AIRLINE TICKETS
42Page:
Packet Page 121 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95637 4/12/2007 (Continued)068864 SANKEI TRAVEL OF AMERICAS INC
AIRLINE TICKETS FOR SISTER CITY STUDENT
623.200.210.557.210.430.00 14,960.00
Total :14,960.00
95638 4/12/2007 071610 SCHLEICHER, BRIAN 3/07 Tuition Reimbursement 1/2 - 3/12/07
Tuition Reimbursement 1/2 - 3/12/07
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 434.45
Total :434.45
95639 4/12/2007 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 03-861716 UNIT 485 - JOINT KITS
UNIT 485 - JOINT KITS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 75.14
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.69
UNIT 485 - SENSOR ASSEMBLY03-861718
UNIT 485 - SENSOR ASSEMBLY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 34.88
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.10
Total :119.81
95640 4/12/2007 066738 SETCOM CORPORATION 79521 UNIT 124 POL - SUPER MIC+
UNIT 124 POL - SUPER MIC+
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 699.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.82
Total :708.82
95641 4/12/2007 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 1-587381 UNIT 93 - BOLT KIT, 4 POLE CONNECTOR, 8
UNIT 93 - BOLT KIT, 4 POLE CONNECTOR, 8
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 116.71
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.04
Total :126.75
95642 4/12/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL
43Page:
Packet Page 122 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95642 4/12/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.23
UTILITY BILLING3890014081
750 15TH ST SW
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 419.55
UTILITY BILLING5040011628
750 15TH ST SW
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 152.52
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014260
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74
Total :632.04
95643 4/12/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 463007757 463-001-867-1
9805 EDMONDS WAY
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.06
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.68
620-001-500-3685009192
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.17
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.43
Total :37.34
95644 4/12/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2260043795 SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 50.00
SIGNAL LIGHT3050047152
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 297.13
SIGNAL LIGHT3800017489
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 79.73
44Page:
Packet Page 123 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95644 4/12/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL4510017488
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74
STREET LIGHTING6000013000
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 8,421.42
STREET LIGHTING6100013009
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,944.24
STREET LIGHTING6100013306
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 170.07
STREET LIGHTING6200013008
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,814.76
Total :18,807.09
95645 4/12/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 34276 INV#34276 EDMONDS PD
MAGMATE PLATES - CRYSTAL, COLLINS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 6.75
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 2.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 0.78
Total :9.53
95646 4/12/2007 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 48471 DUMPING CHARGES
DUMPING CHARGES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 84.61
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1.39
Total :86.00
95647 4/12/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/0401 DUMPING
45Page:
Packet Page 124 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95647 4/12/2007 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
DISPOSAL SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 576.16
Total :576.16
95648 4/12/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40
Total :24.78
95649 4/12/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4110284-01 WATER - JEANS - WAITE
WATER - JEANS - WAITE
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 157.50
BOOTS - WAITE
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 127.75
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 25.39
Total :310.64
95650 4/12/2007 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON Q1-2007 TAX ID# 600 200 320
Q1-2007 Leasehold Tax
001.000.000.237.220.000.00 4,181.39
Q1-2007 Leasehold Tax
001.000.000.362.500.000.00 0.04
Total :4,181.43
95651 4/12/2007 071605 STAVELEY SERVICES FLUID C152334 OIL ANALYSIS BOTTLES
OIL ANALYSIS BOTTLES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 360.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.02
Total :366.02
95652 4/12/2007 031060 STEARNS FINANCIAL SERVICES 7059030-IN RADIX MONTHLY MAINT MAY 07
46Page:
Packet Page 125 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95652 4/12/2007 (Continued)031060 STEARNS FINANCIAL SERVICES
RADIX MONTHLY MAINT MAY 07
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 155.40
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 13.83
Total :169.23
95653 4/12/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 952602 PARKS MAINT
PARKS MAINT
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 4.72
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 0.42
FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES964883
FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 436.95
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 38.89
FS 16 - ELECT SUPPLIES969607
FS 16 - ELECT SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 58.43
CITY HALL - ELECT SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 72.30
PW - ELECT SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 156.77
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.59
Total :794.07
95654 4/12/2007 066726 SUPERSEER CORPORATION 40831 INV#40831 CUST#AE052 EDMONDS PD
47Page:
Packet Page 126 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95654 4/12/2007 (Continued)066726 SUPERSEER CORPORATION
FULL COVERAGE HELMET - L
001.000.410.521.710.350.00 325.00
QUICK RELEASE BUCKLE, EMBLEM
001.000.410.521.710.350.00 21.00
SETCOM HELMET KIT DUAL SPEAKERS, MIKE
001.000.410.521.710.350.00 260.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.710.350.00 14.00
Total :620.00
95655 4/12/2007 068619 SWENSON, LINDA 1152 SUMMER CRAZE DESIGN
SUMMER CRAZE DESIGN
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,269.00
Total :1,269.00
95656 4/12/2007 071611 TACTICAL TRAINING &CRYSTAL NARCOTICS WARRANT SERV/K.CRYSTAL - EDM
K.CRYSTAL/REGISTRATION~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 300.00
Total :300.00
95657 4/12/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 39099 STREET/STORM - 83 WORK T SHIRTS
STREET/STORM - 83 WORK T SHIRTS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 376.75
STREET/STORM - 83 WORK T SHIRTS
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 376.75
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 33.54
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 33.53
Total :820.57
95658 4/12/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY C/A 148134 Aquatics (summer seasonal ads) #07-12 -
48Page:
Packet Page 127 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95658 4/12/2007 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
Aquatics (summer seasonal ads) #07-12 -
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 113.26
Meter Reader, #07-18
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.47
Total :147.73
95659 4/12/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1483324 NEWSPAPER ADS
Council & Planning Bd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,200.85
NEWSPAPER ADS1490289
Ordinance 3632
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 43.32
NEWSPAPER ADS1490290
Ordinance 3631
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 43.32
Total :1,287.49
95660 4/12/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1488319 Legal Advertising CU 06-93 O'Hanley
Legal Advertising CU 06-93 O'Hanley
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 42.48
Legal Advertising S 2007-0004 Pentilla1490683
Legal Advertising S 2007-0004 Pentilla
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 15.12
Legal Advertising S 2006-152 Webber1490684
Legal Advertising S 2006-152 Webber
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 15.12
Total :72.72
95661 4/12/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES C/A 042483000 Parks Maintenance Worker I, #07-09
Parks Maintenance Worker I, #07-09
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 295.14
Parks Maintenance Worker I, #07-09
001.000.640.576.800.440.00 295.14
Total :590.28
49Page:
Packet Page 128 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95662 4/12/2007 066430 THERMO PROBES INC 28183 C-248 THERMOCOUPLE
C-248 THERMOCOUPLE
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,861.42
Freight
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 53.90
Total :1,915.32
95663 4/12/2007 071582 TRANSLATION SOLUTION CORP 2804 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 500.00
Total :500.00
95664 4/12/2007 071590 TRT LCC 1 MAR 07 EXAMINER SERVICES
Mar 07 Examiner Services
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,500.00
MAR 07 EXAMINER EXPENSES1 - Exp
Mar 07 Examiner Expenses Copies &
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 9.39
Total :3,509.39
95665 4/12/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7376601 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
PVC PIPES, ADAPTERS, ELLS, BUSHINGS,
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,223.39
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 108.88
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES7385201
SOAKER HOSE, CEMENT, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 74.70
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.65
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES7388481
PVC PIPES, TEES, ELLS, CEMENT, ETC.
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 468.29
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 41.68
50Page:
Packet Page 129 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95665 4/12/2007 (Continued)061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES7388518
VALVE BOXES, COUPLINGS, PIPES, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 327.95
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.19
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES7388629
COUPLINGS, SHOVEL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 45.07
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.01
Total :2,329.81
95666 4/12/2007 070767 UNITED RENTAL NORTHWEST INC 63371078-001 STORM - WACKER
STORM - WACKER
411.000.652.542.400.350.00 2,800.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.350.00 246.40
Total :3,046.40
95667 4/12/2007 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 344172 SEWER - MANHOLE NET W/ POLE CONNECTOR
SEWER - MANHOLE NET W/ POLE CONNECTOR
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 79.80
FIBERGLASS POLES
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 291.80
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 69.97
Total :441.57
95668 4/12/2007 064973 VAN METER & ASSOCIATES INC 00-9323 INV#00-9323 - DAMIAN SMITH/EDMONDS PD
DAMIAN SMITH/REGISTRATION~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 125.00
Total :125.00
95669 4/12/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
51Page:
Packet Page 130 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
52
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95669 4/12/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.29
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-5055
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 55.87
EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY425-771-4741
EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 48.04
Total :146.20
95670 4/12/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR
Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 33.92
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 113.69
Total :147.61
95671 4/12/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE
FS #16-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.24
Total :50.24
95672 4/12/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 269992985-1 425-308-9867
cell phone-water watch
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 35.92
425-870-0617469985965-1
Cell phone-Jim Waite
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 29.20
Cell phone-Jim Waite
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 29.20
Total :94.32
95673 4/12/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 29860645 1066294
52Page:
Packet Page 131 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
53
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
95673 4/12/2007 (Continued)069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC
HANDCREAM
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 115.37
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 0.86
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 10.35
106629429860648
SOFTGUARD REFILL
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 10.66
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 0.42
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 0.98
106629429889859
GLOVES
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 129.64
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 1.03
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 11.63
Total :280.94
95674 4/12/2007 047605 WA ST TREASURER Q1-07 EPD 1ST QUARTER PROCEEDS TO STATE/EDMONDS
1ST QUARTERLY REPORT~
001.000.000.237.240.000.00 176.82
Total :176.82
95675 4/12/2007 065828 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2007-0588 INV#2007-0588 - D.LIM/EDMONDS PD
D.LIM/REGISTRATION~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
95676 4/12/2007 070951 WAMBOLT, RON 3/23/07 Wambolt CR Mileage Council Retreat 2007 LaConner
Mileage Council Retreat 2007 LaConner
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 55.13
53Page:
Packet Page 132 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
54
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :55.13956764/12/2007 070951 070951 WAMBOLT, RON
95677 4/12/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I06015665 INV#I06015665 EDMONDS PD
BACKGROUND CHECKS 03/07
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 120.00
Total :120.00
95678 4/12/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0600804 TRAINING MISC
MCO:Beardsley,D2,Hammer.;Martin, DO
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 407.62
Total :407.62
95679 4/12/2007 045912 WASPC 20137 ELECTRONIC HOME MONITORING
ELECTRONIC HOME MONITORING
001.000.230.523.200.510.00 1,569.75
Total :1,569.75
95680 4/12/2007 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 0736518-2677-5 202-0001256-2677-0
ASH DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.474.65 3,327.88
Total :3,327.88
95681 4/12/2007 061047 WWCPA 052207 3 REGISTRATIONS FOR SEWER MAINTENANCE
3 REGISTRATIONS FOR SEWER MAINTENANCE
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 345.00
Total :345.00
95682 4/12/2007 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0112759 STREET - RIVETS, ANCHORS
STREET - RIVETS, ANCHORS
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 367.25
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 70.66
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 38.54
Total :476.45
Bank total :441,911.82175 Vouchers for bank code :front
54Page:
Packet Page 133 of 396
04/12/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
55
9:43:50AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
441,911.82Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report175
55Page:
Packet Page 134 of 396
AM-927 2.E.
Faith Community Proclamation
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Linda Carl, Mayor's Office
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of Faith Community Church - 50th Anniversary, April 15, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Faith Community Church opened its doors on April 14, 1957 and its pastoral staff and congregation
have spent 50 years serving the Edmonds community through positive fellowship and charitable
activities. They will have an anniversary service and a luncheon on Sunday, April 15 to celebrate
this milestone.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proclamation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 04/10/2007 03:33 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/10/2007 03:54 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 04/05/2007 02:57
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 135 of 396
Packet Page 136 of 396
AM-930 2.F.
Friar Tuck Lane Authorization to Call for Bids
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering
Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization to call for bids for the Friar Tuck Lane Drainage Improvements Project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council authorize Staff to call for bids on the Friar Tuck Lane Drainage Improvements project.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The design of the Friar Tuck Lane Drainage Improvements project has been completed by City
Staff. This project is located in the Southwest Edmonds Basin. Since annexation, the City has
constructed infiltration facilities at many locations in Southwest Edmonds to reduce ponding on
streets and private property in the area. The existing drainage system at Friar Tuck Lane is
undersized for the large storm events, and the proposed improvement will provide over five times
as much capacity. The adopted 2007 capital budget includes $75,000 for Southwest Edmonds
drainage projects.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: CIP Project Description
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 04/10/2007 01:40 PM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 04/10/2007 03:07 PM APRV
3 City Clerk Linda Hynd 04/10/2007 03:33 PM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/10/2007 03:54 PM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 04/10/2007 11:45
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 137 of 396
Packet Page 138 of 396
Packet Page 139 of 396
AM-931 2.G.
100th Avenue West Right-of-Way Stabilization Project Call for Bids
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering
Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Authorization to call for bids for the 100th Avenue West Right-of-Way Stabilization Project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council authorize Staff to call for bids for the 100th Avenue West Right-of-Way Stabilization
project.
Previous Council Action
On July 20, 2004, Council awarded a consultant contract for design of the 100th Avenue West
Right-of-Way Stabilization project to Reid Middleton, Inc.
Narrative
In December 2001, Landau Associates presented a Geotechnical Alternatives Evaluation Report
providing stabilization measures for roadway and right-of-way along 100th Avenue West. On July
20, 2004, Council awarded a contract for design of the 100th Avenue West Right-of-Way
Stabilization project to Reid Middleton, Inc.
The design of the 100th Avenue West Right-of-Way Stabilization project is now complete, the
additional right-of-way required for the project has been purchased by the City, and we are ready
to call for bids on the project. The adopted 2007 Capital Budget contains $1,000,000 for this
project. The project is being funded in part by a low-interest Public Works Trust Fund loan. A
description of the project is included as Attachment 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: CIP Project Description
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 04/10/2007 03:13 PM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 04/10/2007 03:16 PM APRV
3 City Clerk Linda Hynd 04/10/2007 03:33 PM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/10/2007 03:54 PM APRV
Packet Page 140 of 396
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 04/10/2007 02:20
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 141 of 396
Packet Page 142 of 396
AM-942 2.H.
Caspers, Ninth and Puget Drive Walkway Consultant Award
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Don Fiene Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Reid Middleton, Inc. for the
Caspers, Ninth Avenue and Puget Drive Walkway Project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement with Reid Middleton, Inc.
Previous Council Action
On October 24, 2006, Council authorized Staff to advertise for statements of qualification from
engineering consultants for the design of the Caspers, Ninth Avenue and Puget Drive Walkway
project.
Narrative
The 2007-2008 adopted capital budget includes $380,000 for the Caspers, Ninth Avenue and Puget
Drive Walkway project. The CIP description of the project is included as Attachment 1. On
January 18, 2007 a design consultant selection committee met and interviewed two project teams.
After completion of the interviews, the project team of Reid Middleton, Inc. was chosen by
consensus of the committee for design of the improvements. Subsequently, references were
contacted to verify the competence of the firm. The references were favorable.
This project will significantly improve pedestrian safety along one of the City's busiest principal
arterials by construction of a walkway on the side of these streets which currently lack sidewalks.
The project also includes enhancements to existing uncontrolled pedestrian crossings to improve
their visibility and safety, as well as upgrades to existing curb ramps to meet current ADA
accessibility requirements.
City Staff was successful in securing a grant for construction funding for this project. Staff and the
consultant have now agreed on a scope of services and budget for the design work. The
Professional Services Agreement is attached as Attachment 2.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: CIP Project Description
Packet Page 143 of 396
Link: RMI Agreement
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 04/12/2007 05:49 PM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 04/13/2007 08:26 AM APRV
3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/13/2007 08:34 AM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/13/2007 08:40 AM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/13/2007 09:16 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 04/12/2007 01:33
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/13/2007
Packet Page 144 of 396
Packet Page 145 of 396
Packet Page 146 of 396
Packet Page 147 of 396
Packet Page 148 of 396
Packet Page 149 of 396
Packet Page 150 of 396
Packet Page 151 of 396
Packet Page 152 of 396
Packet Page 153 of 396
Packet Page 154 of 396
Packet Page 155 of 396
Packet Page 156 of 396
Packet Page 157 of 396
Packet Page 158 of 396
Packet Page 159 of 396
Packet Page 160 of 396
Packet Page 161 of 396
Packet Page 162 of 396
Packet Page 163 of 396
Packet Page 164 of 396
Packet Page 165 of 396
Packet Page 166 of 396
Packet Page 167 of 396
Packet Page 168 of 396
Packet Page 169 of 396
AM-939 2.I.
2007 First Quarter Budget Amendment
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Debra Sharp
Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
2007 First Quarter Budget Amendment.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve attached budget amending Ordinance.
Previous Council Action
Finance Committee 4/10/2007.
Narrative
In governmental budgeting, expenditures may take place up to the amount appropriated in the
current budget. Financial activity impacting appropriation levels are brought before the Edmonds
City Council on a quarterly basis in the form of a budget amendment ordinance.
The first quarter 2007 budget amendment contains a total of 12 proposed adjustments, eight of
which have previously been before Council. There are four new items for Council to consider.
The first item is an increase in General Fund expenditures for labor negotiations and the second is
an increase in Fleet expenditures for the replacement of a patrol vehicle. The final two items in this
section are for Parks supplies and small equipment which will receive private donation money for
the proposed expenditures.
Overall, General Fund requests total $91,595 of which $3,190 will be funded by a new private
donation. The net impact to the General Fund's ending cash is a decrease of $88,405.
Non-General Fund requests total $187,500 of which $145,832 will be funded either by private
donations, utility customer payments, interfund transfers or insurance reimbursement. The net
decrease to Non-General Fund ending cash is $41,668. The major Non-General Fund expenditure
requests include $31,000 for capital projects in the Street Construction Fund, $104,500 for storm
water utility taxes that will be transferred to the General Fund and $30,000 for a replacement patrol
car purchased out of the Internal Service Fund.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Packet Page 170 of 396
Link: 2007 First Quarter Budget Amendment
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Dan Clements 04/12/2007 12:18 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:15 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 01:16 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:17 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debra
Sharp
Started On: 04/12/2007 11:12
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 171 of 396
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3613 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund
Transfers and increases in appropriations; and
WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is
transferred from one fund to another; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations
and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and
federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2007
Budget; and
WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified;
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 3613 adopting the final budget for the
fiscal year 2007 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in “Exhibit A” adopted herein
by reference.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take
L:\PRODUCTIONDB\CCOUNCIL\0019_939_2007 FIRST AMENDING ORDINANCE.DOC
Packet Page 172 of 396
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of
the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY ___
W. SCOTT SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
2
Packet Page 173 of 396
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 3613 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND
EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________,2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
3
Packet Page 174 of 396
EXHIBIT“A:” BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND
2007 2007
FUND FUND BEGINNING REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
NO. DESCRIPTION CASH CASH
001 GENERAL FUND 3,551,328 29,885,253 32,118,393 1,318,188
006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 1,927,600 0 0 1,927,600
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 338,670 476,095 497,250 317,515
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 46,260 61,883 89,213 18,930
111 STREET FUND 101,683 1,273,029 1,340,217 34,495
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 793,490 2,136,696 2,246,699 683,487
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 0 625,000 625,000 0
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 247,138 1,173,675 1,142,460 278,353
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 204,625 65,930 103,250 167,305
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 15,847 600 0 16,447
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 55,268 63,625 66,625 52,268
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 71,574 18,600 18,000 72,174
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 8,303 2,740 3,200 7,843
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 26,941 17,035 21,800 22,176
125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 4,996,514 1,517,500 4,508,200 2,005,814
126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 214,648 1,470,000 880,661 803,987
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 148,875 16,260 12,866 152,269
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 0 316,000 327,000 -11,000
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 160,240 261,214 180,559 240,895
131 FIRE DONATIONS 13,778 5,838 0 19,616
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 0 420,000 420,000 0
211 LID FUND CONTROL 1,766 351,000 345,300 7,466
213 LID GUARANTY FUND 41,529 2,000 0 43,529
234 LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 415,710 415,710 0
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 4,787,026 12,735,067 13,734,875 3,787,218
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 2,666,800 7,330,805 7,861,000 2,136,605
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 1,121,321 947,982 1,286,844 782,459
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 3,739,375 2,170,364 2,640,299 3,269,440
601 PARKS TRUST FUND 124,908 4,000 0 128,908
610 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 323,949 60,126 0 384,075
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 283,727 100,368 113,000 271,095
621 SPECIAL LIBRARY 0 0 0 0
623 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 14,937 21,200 20,000 16,137
Totals 26,028,120 63,945,595 71,018,421 18,955,294
4
Packet Page 175 of 396
EXHIBIT “B”: BUDGET AMENDMENTS BY EXPENDITURE
ORD. NO.
ORD.
NO.
ORD.
NO.
ORD.
NO. 2007
FUND FUND 3613 Amended
NO. DESCRIPTION 11/21/2006 Budget
001 GENERAL FUND 32,026,798 91,595 0 0 32,118,393
006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 0 0 0 0 0
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 497,250 0 0 0 497,250
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 89,213 0 0 0 89,213
111 STREET FUND 1,340,217 0 0 0 1,340,217
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2,215,699 31,000 0 0 2,246,699
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 625,000 0 0 0 625,000
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,142,460 0 0 0 1,142,460
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 103,250 0 0 0 103,250
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 0 0 0 0 0
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 63,625 3,000 0 0 66,625
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 18,000 0 0 0 18,000
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,200 0 0 0 3,200
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 21,800 0 0 0 21,800
125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 4,508,200 0 0 0 4,508,200
126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 880,661 0 0 0 880,661
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 4,866 8,000 0 0 12,866
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 316,000 11,000 0 0 327,000
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 180,559 0 0 0 180,559
131 FIRE DONATIONS 0 0 0 0 0
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 420,000 0 0 0 420,000
211 LID FUND CONTROL 345,300 0 0 0 345,300
213 LID GUARANTY FUND 0 0 0 0 0
234 LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND 415,710 0 0 0 415,710
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 13,528,375 206,500 0 0 13,734,875
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 7,861,000 0 0 0 7,861,000
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 1,286,844 0 0 0 1,286,844
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,610,299 30,000 0 0 2,640,299
601 PARKS TRUST FUND 0 0 0 0 0
610 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 0 0 0 0 0
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 113,000 0 0 0 113,000
621 SPECIAL LIBRARY 0 0 0 0 0
623 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 20,000 0 0 0 20,000
Totals 70,637,326 381,095 0 0 71,018,421
5
Packet Page 176 of 396
EXHIBIT “C”: BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL
Items Previously Before Council
Community Services Professional Services 2,000
Community Services Ending Fund Balance 2,000
Expenditure initially budgeted in 2006 but unable to complete
the analysis
Non-deparmental Professional Services 36,405
Non-deparmental Ending Fund Balance 36,405 Fiber Optic Improvement project carried forward from 2006
Street Construction Construction 11,000
Street Construction Ending Fund Balance 11,000
92nd Ave W/ 234th St Sw intersection safety impr change
order request
Street Construction Professional Services 20,000
Street Construction Transfer-In 20,000
Non-deparmental Transfer-Out 20,000
Non-deparmental Ending Fund Balance 20,000
Evaluation of the intersection at 88th Ave. W. and 196th
Street SW
Log Cabin Maintenance Professional Services 3,000
Log Cabin Maintenance Ending Fund Balance 3,000
Log cabin log maintenance-initially budgeted in 2006 but
unable to complete
Special Projects Fund Professional Services 11,000
Special Projects Fund Ending Fund Balance 11,000
Professional services budget from 2006 carried forward to
2007
Utility Fund Stormwater Tax Trf 104,500
Utility Fund Stormwater Tax Trf 104,500
Stormwater Utility Tax transfer to general fund-tax approved
after budget docs prepared
Utility Fund Ending Fund Balance 102,000
Utility Fund Water Utility Increase 102,000
Water rate increase - increase was approved after the budget
docs prepared
New Items for Council to Consider
Legal Professional Services 30,000
Legal Ending Fund Balance 30,000 Labor negotiations
Internal Service Fund Equipment 30,000
Internal Service Fund Beginning Fund Balance 13,332
Internal Service Fund Ending Fund Balance 16,668 Patrol vehicle #234 totaled in accident, need to replace
Parks & Recreation Small Equipment 3,190
Parks & Recreation Private Donation 3,190
Purchase of a touch tank to be used at the Beach Ranger
Visitor Station
Gifts Catolog Fund Supplies 8,000
Gifts Catolog Fund Private Donation 8,000
Purchase three non coin operated viewing scopes for the
waterfront
6
Packet Page 177 of 396
AM-936 3.
ADB candidate confirmation
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:5 Minutes
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of Bruce O'Neill and Steve Bullock to the
Architectural Design Board.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Please confirm both candidates to serve on the ADB.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Mayor Haakenson has appointed Bruce O’Neill to the builder position (position #2) and Steve
Bullock to the landscape architect position (position #4). Bruce will fill an unexpired term that goes
through the end of 2007. He is eligible for two full terms started in January 2008. Steve begins his
first term immediately and is eligible for one additional four-year term in January 2011. Neither
position requires Edmonds residency; all positions on the ADB are four-year terms and require
Council confirmation.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Candidate applications
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:28 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 11:31 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 04/12/2007 08:54
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 178 of 396
Packet Page 179 of 396
Packet Page 180 of 396
AM-938 4.
Earth Week Proclamation
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:5 Minutes
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of Earth Week in Edmonds, April 14-22, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
In honor of Step it Up National Day of Climate Action on Saturday, April 14 and Earth Day on
Sunday, April 22, the Mayor is proclaiming the days from April 14 to April 22 as Earth Week in
Edmonds. Many activities are occuring around the region in conjunction with these two days,
including a beach cleanup in Edmonds on Saturday, April 21. City staff and local citizens, under
Mayor Haakenson's direction, continue to work together to address how Edmonds can positively
impact climate and environmental issues.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proclamation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:28 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 11:31 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 04/12/2007 09:45
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 181 of 396
Packet Page 182 of 396
AM-935 5.
Adoption of Six-Year CIP Ordinance
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Don Fiene Time:15 Minutes
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance adopting a Six-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the years
2007 through 2013.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council adopt the proposed ordinance (Attachment 2). Staff recommends adoption of the
2007-2013 CIP as shown in Option 1 (Attachment 3).
Previous Council Action
City Council held a public hearing March 20, 2007 for the adoption of the 2007-2013 Six-Year
Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Narrative
At the March 20, 2007 City Council meeting (see Attachment 1), Council voted to approve the
2007-2013 Six-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). At the meeting, Council amended the
CIP as presented to include funding for a study of the 88th Avenue West/196th Street SW
intersection in 2007. Council also amended the CIP as presented to fund a study for the 80th
Avenue West sight distance issue in 2008/2009 and a construction project in 2010. Additionally,
Council discussed the possibility of funding the 80the Avenue West sight distance construction
project using funds anticipated from a land sale on 80th Avenue West near the proposed project.
Also, there was a discussion regarding re-prioritizing the 80the Avenue West pedestrian project to
coincide with the 80th Avenue West sight distance project.
As directed by Council the Fund 112 CIP has been revised as follows:
1. The study of the 88th Avenue West and 196th Street SW intersection has been moved up from
2013 to 2007. The proposed CIP now includes $20,000 in 2007 for this study, with a $20,000
revenue transfer to Fund 112 from the General Fund for this study.
2. The 80th Avenue West sight distance improvements and the associated 80th Avenue West
walkway project (from 180th Street SW to 188th Street SW) have been moved up from 2013. The
proposed CIP now includes $50,000 for design in 2008 and $220,000 for construction in 2010 for
the 80th Avenue West sight distance improvements, and $75,000 for design in 2008 and $325,000
for construction in 2010 for the 80th Avenue West walkway project.
Packet Page 183 of 396
As noted above, the Council discussed the possibility of funding the 80th Avenue sight distance
improvements construction project using the $220,000 anticipated from a land sale on 80th Avenue
West near the proposed project, but a decision was not made regarding this. Therefore Staff has
prepared two options for the revised Fund 112 and Fund 125 (REET 2 - Transportation).
Option 1 (Included in Attachment 3) is the proposed CIP, revised to reflect the re-prioritization of
the 80th Avenue (sight distance and walkway) projects and the 88th Avenue West project, which
includes a $220,000 revenue transfer to Fund 112 from the General Fund (equal to the funds
anticipated from the land sale) in 2010.
Option 2 (Attachment 4) is the proposed CIP without the $220,000 revenue transfer to Fund 112
from the General Fund.
In each case (Option 1 and Option 2), some minor shifting/re-prioritization of other projects was
made to accommodate the new prioritization of the 80th and 88th Avenues West projects. These
adjustments include the following:
- 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue West (Five Corners) intersection improvements slipped one
year, from 2010/2011 to 2011/2012.
- 72nd Avenue West pedestrian improvements slipped three years, from 2010 to 2013.
- Ninth Avenue and Caspers Street intersection improvements slipped one year, from 2011 to
2012.
- Ninth Avenue and Main Street intersection improvements slipped one year, from 2010 to 2011.
The primary difference between the two options is that adoption of the Option 2 CIP also results in
a $200,000 reduction in Citywide overlay projects in 2010.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Council Public Hearing Minutes
Link: CIP Ordinance
Link: Full CIP with Option 1
Link: Fund 112 & 125-REET.Opt. 2
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 04/12/2007 05:42 PM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 04/13/2007 08:26 AM APRV
3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/13/2007 08:33 AM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/13/2007 08:40 AM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/13/2007 09:16 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 04/12/2007 07:34
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/13/2007
Packet Page 184 of 396
Packet Page 185 of 396
Packet Page 186 of 396
Packet Page 187 of 396
Packet Page 188 of 396
Packet Page 189 of 396
Packet Page 190 of 396
Packet Page 191 of 396
Packet Page 192 of 396
Packet Page 193 of 396
Packet Page 194 of 396
Packet Page 195 of 396
Packet Page 196 of 396
Packet Page 197 of 396
Packet Page 198 of 396
Packet Page 199 of 396
Packet Page 200 of 396
Packet Page 201 of 396
Packet Page 202 of 396
Packet Page 203 of 396
Packet Page 204 of 396
Packet Page 205 of 396
Packet Page 206 of 396
Packet Page 207 of 396
Packet Page 208 of 396
Packet Page 209 of 396
Packet Page 210 of 396
AM-940 6.
Rezone Request on 76th Ave W. by Shapiro/Knowles
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:15 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Closed Record Review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone from
Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business (BC). The site is located at 24310 76th
Ave. W. Applicant: A.D. Shapiro Architects for Ron Knowles. File No. R-2005-97.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance approving the change in zoning from BN to BC,
as recommended by the Planning Board.
Previous Council Action
The City Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment for the subject property in
December, 2006.
Narrative
The City Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment for the subject property in
December, 2006. The plan amendment essentially modified the comprehensive plan boundaries to
coincide with property boundaries in the vicinity. The applicant is now following up the plan
amendment by requesting that the zoning be changed to be consistent with the new comprehensive
plan map -- so that there will no longer be a split in zoning on the property.
The Planning Board held a public hearing on the proposal on February 14, 2007, and recommended
that the application be approved, changing the zoning from BN to BC.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhilbit 1: Planning Board hearing transcript
Link: Exhibit 2: Planning Board staff report
Link: Exhibit 3: Additional comment letters
Link: Exhibit 4: Parties of record
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
Packet Page 211 of 396
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:30 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 01:44 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:52 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 04/12/2007 11:23
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 212 of 396
Packet Page 213 of 396
Packet Page 214 of 396
Packet Page 215 of 396
Packet Page 216 of 396
Packet Page 217 of 396
Packet Page 218 of 396
Packet Page 219 of 396
Packet Page 220 of 396
Packet Page 221 of 396
Packet Page 222 of 396
Packet Page 223 of 396
Packet Page 224 of 396
Packet Page 225 of 396
Packet Page 226 of 396
Packet Page 227 of 396
Packet Page 228 of 396
Packet Page 229 of 396
Packet Page 230 of 396
Packet Page 231 of 396
Packet Page 232 of 396
Packet Page 233 of 396
Parties of Record
R-2005-07 – Shapiro/Knowles
Applicants
Knowles, Ron
Shapiro, Tony
Public (from petitions – Exhibit 3)
Besaw, Grace M.
Cox, David (Seattle Baptist Church)
Curl, Jerry & Ruth
Fleming, Wanda
Garhofer, Brent
Goff, Tashiye
Lenz, Shirley
Nand, Kamal & Nayantra
Park, Chong
Pletz, Carol & Jim
Puhl, Ann B.
Wilson, Walter
Packet Page 234 of 396
AM-941 7.
Rezone Request by Shapiro et.al. on Edmonds Way
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:45 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Closed Record Review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone from
Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) to Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way (RM-EW), and from
Community Business (BC) to Community Business - Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The site is
located at 23012, 23014, 23028, 23100, 23110 Edmonds Way, 9133 232nd St. SW, and the
vacant lot at the northwest corner of 232nd St. SW & Edmonds Way. Applicant: A.D.
Shapiro for SGA Corp. File No. R-2006-95.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance approving the changes in zoning, as
recommended by the Planning Board.
Previous Council Action
The City Council approved an amendment to the Edmonds Community Development Code
(ECDC) in February, 2007, which created the zones that the applicants are now seeking to apply to
the subject properties (see Ordinance #3627, Attachment 3 of Exhibit 2).
Narrative
The applicants are requesting a change in zoning for properties they own within the Edmonds Way
Corridor (SR-104). The Planning Board held a public hearing on the request on March 14, 2007,
and after deliberations, recommended that the City Council approve the changes in zoning.
The Planning Board action and their reasoning is contained in the verbatim transcript (Exhibit 1).
The staff report and additional comment letters are contained in Exhibits 2 and 3, respectively.
Parties of record for the City Council closed record review are listed in Exhibit 4.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Planning Board hearing transcript
Link: Exhibit 2: Planning Board staff report
Link: Exhibit 3: Additional comment letters
Link: Exhibit 4: Parties of record
Packet Page 235 of 396
Link: Exhibit 4: Parties of record
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:38 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 01:44 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:52 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 04/12/2007 12:05
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 236 of 396
CITY OF EDMONDS
VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS OF PLANNING BOARD HEARING
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007
Chair Guenther: All right, we are going to get on with the rest of our meeting tonight. We are now at Item 6b, a public
hearing by Tony Shapiro on an application to rezone properties from multi-family residential (RM-1.5) to RM-Edmonds Way
(RM-EW) and from Community Business (BC) to BC-Edmonds Way (BC-EW). File Number R-06-95. All right, this is a
quasi-judicial hearing so, as a part of the Appearance of Fairness, has there been any ex parte communication with the
applicant?
Board Member Freeman: I have something to declare. It was after our meeting here, when we made the recommendation
to go to Council, but before it went to Council, Tony phoned me one afternoon and asked me if I could assist in perhaps the
presentation to Council. I said I couldn’t do that. We had an amicable chitchat, and it that was all there was to it. I certainly
didn’t speak up at Council or contact Council in any way. I just wanted that for the record.
Chair Guenther: That’s been duly noted and disclosed. Do any of the members have any interest in the property or the
application? None. Do they own property within, say, 300 feet of it, of the application? No. Do they stand to gain or lose
any financial benefit as a result of the outcome of this hearing? No. I prepared tonight. I got a list. I believe everybody on
the Board can hear and consider the application in a fair and objective manner. All right. Are there any members of the
audience who wish to challenge the appearance of fairness of the members of the Planning Board. No. All right. I think we
can get on with the hearing now, so first is the staff report, Rob.
Mr. Chave: Okay, basically, this is an application that the applicants had chosen to wait until they saw whether or not the
new zones were established that they had applied for in the codes, and that was the BC-Edmonds Way and the RM or Multi-
family-Edmonds Way. Those are now in the codes and are identified as potentially applicable within the Edmonds Way
Corridor, which is where these properties are. You have a Comprehensive Plan Map that illustrates that. Currently, the
properties are already zoned RM-1.5 and BC, and they are compliant with the Edmonds Way Corridor. The logic behind the
application, at least expressed by the applicants, is that the proposed zones would do a better job of implementing the
Edmonds Way Corridor than perhaps the existing ones do.
Mr. Chave: The staff report and the materials submitted by the applicants go into some detail on the RM or the multi-family
aspect of the application, so I don’t think I want to touch on that unless the Board has questions. The Staff Report, however,
I think we omitted some detail on the BC portion of the application, so I did want to address at least the criteria for the
rezone. The applicant did discuss this, but even so, I think it’s important to get the staff point of view. So again, the
Comprehensive Plan, I am just talking about the BC portion of the application now, the BC-EW. The Comprehensive Plan
does say that the Edmonds Way Corridor is appropriate for a variety of zones, and if you will note elsewhere in the corridor
there are other commercial zones similarly situated at typically intersections along the corridor. There are several places that
those occur, and obviously, it’s already zoned at this particular intersection for that use. So it does potentially implement the
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Chave: The zoning ordinance, the purpose of the BC-EW zone really does again focus on the Edmonds Way Corridor,
so logically, since the zone was specifically created for the corridor, it should be appropriate, again, for this particular
location.
Mr. Chave: The surrounding area, one of the criteria there is relationship of the proposed zoning to the existing land uses.
Packet Page 237 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 2
Board Member Young: Rob, could you please speak into the microphone? I can’t hear a thing you are saying.
Mr. Chave: In and around the surrounding area is part of the discussion, or part of the criteria that you have to consider for a
change in zoning. The surrounding area, in this case, as I already noted, there is a mixture of multi-family commercial zones
along the corridor. So again, the BC-EW zone, it’s really a variant of the existing BC zoning, so logically, since that, again,
was created for the Edmonds Way Corridor, it would make sense to apply here.
Mr. Chave: One of the things that will have to be considered further down the line is the actual configuration of a specific
project. Now, we did include material in your packet, there was a traffic report. Obviously, that’s discussing a fairly specific
project. There was some review of that in the City in the engineering and so forth. All that really goes to point out is that
potential impacts, there are multiple ways of addressing those, but this is not the time to do that. That’s going to be a project
specific decision that comes at a later point in time. Even though a SEPA Determination, State Environmental Policy Act
Determination, was issued for the rezone, that really only deals with it as a non-project specific action. So it’s just the change
in zoning. The SEPA Determination does not deal with a specific project, which obviously the applicants have in mind. But
as the Planning Board understands, things can change. Specific projects can change. Owners can change, but the zoning
stays in place. So all you are dealing with at this point in time is really the zoning questions. All that goes by way of saying
that additional environmental review, SEPA Determination, Architectural Design Board public hearing, you know, a lot of
additional review has yet to be done on any specific project that comes a long for this project.
Mr. Chave: Another criteria is whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding
area or in City policy to justify the rezone. Arguably, one change has been the creation of the new zones that would apply to
the Edmonds Way Corridor. You know, that’s an obvious change. Those weren’t available before, and they weren’t
available at the time the property was previously changed to BC, which was actually just a few years ago. So that’s a
relatively recent change. Also, there has been additional development on the Edmonds Way Corridor and additional changes
in zoning trying to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan for the corridor. So it appears that what they are requesting
here fits into that.
Mr. Chave: Suitability of the property. Partially what the zone was created for, the BC-EW, was to address or deal with
unique pieces of property that have some changing grade and so forth. A couple of the provisions in the BC-EW zone deal
with trying to increase setbacks, improve buffers, and so forth, which seems to be appropriate here.
Mr. Chave: Now, another criteria deals with value, the relative value to the City versus the applicant. Obviously, the
applicant feels they have a value in what they are proposing. The City’s value really lies in going back to the Comprehensive
Plan direction for the Edmonds Way Corridor. What the City’s overall direction for is trying to focus development on the
corridor rather than increasing or changing zoning as you get back off the corridor into the residential neighborhoods. So one
of the keys, from the City’s approach, is try and put multi-family and more intensive commercial development and so forth in
areas that have strong arterials, connections, transit and other kinds of facilities that support that intensification.
Mr. Chave: Over the last ten years, or since we adopted the first Comprehensive Plan, one of the hallmarks of that plan is
that we didn’t want to go trying to change more properties from single-family into more intensive uses, whether that was
duplexes or other kinds of things. When you do that approach, sort of the other shoe to fall is that you want to make
maximum use of areas that are served by adequate roads, services, and so forth. And that’s why the intensification of places
like Edmonds Way Corridor, Highway 99 and so forth have really been considered by the City. I think that’s was swayed the
City Council to adopt the BC-EW and the RM-EW zones. The idea is to place that more intense development in the areas
where it is appropriate, where it can be served. The other part of that is trying to minimize or use design review to try and
make sure there is adequate buffering, landscaping and all those kinds of things. The BC-EW zone also helps accomplish
that by at least providing minimal buffers, landscaping and so forth that the BC zone does not provide. So there are
additional setback protections and so forth.
Mr. Chave: One of the things we will be looking for, of course, in the further SEPA review of a project and in design
review, is actually how the transition from the project site to the residences immediately adjoining, how that transition is
accomplished. So that’s something that’s yet to be determined. We can’t determine it with the zone, per say, but we can
determine it later in time when we actually see a specific project. So with that, that’s all the staff has.
Packet Page 238 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 3
Chair Guenther: Any questions of staff?
Board Member Reed: I have a question, and it just has to do with the Edmonds Way Corridor in general. Where does it
start and where does it stop for purposes of the application of these new zones?
Mr. Chave: Basically, it starts just east of what you would call the Westgate Center. It’s roughly, let’s see, as I recall, it’s
about, well, the vacant lot just east of the carwash, running east and southeast all the way to 99.
Board Member Reed: Where 99 crosses over?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, where it meets 99.
Board Member Reed: Okay, that’s what I thought, but I just wanted to clarify that. Thank you.
Chair Guenther: Would the applicant like to comment on the application?
Mr. Shapiro: You bet.
Chair Guenther: Please come forward.
Mr. Shapiro: Thank you. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with you this evening. Could we dim the lights a little bit?
We have three parts of our presentation here that we would like to touch upon. I would initially like to talk a little bit about
the history, and I am not concrete on my dates yet. I believe that it was probably around 2001 or 2002 that the Planning
Board created the Edmonds Way Corridor, yet it was not specifically applied to any properties along Edmonds. In 2003 we
began discussions with the Planning Staff about applying this new designation to some properties on Edmonds Way, one of
which is the site on 232nd that’s being discussed tonight. The other of which is next to the carwash, down the street towards
town. We made application for a comp plan designation change for these properties. At that point, the staff requested that
we include additional properties up and down Edmonds Way. We, in turn, did that and included, I can’t say specifically, but
I think it was the majority of the property on Edmonds Way at the request of Planning Staff, was folded into our application
for comp plan change. That went before the Planning Board, and the application was made, I believe in 2003. It went before
the Board in 04 and was enacted by Council, I believe in January of 05.
Mr. Shapiro: So there’s been a number of people, neighbors that have talked about this being a rush/rush project. I think
that some of the Council people raised that issue. This process has been discussed and worked through in multiple different
layers. I would like to touch briefly about the history, we’ll get specific in the rezones, and then we’ve got our traffic
engineering to address some specific concerns that have been raised regarding the access onto 232nd. Our rezone before you
tonight does not have a specific context for how we are going to access 232nd yet. We do desire to access 232nd and we felt it
best to discuss that at this juncture.
Mr. Shapiro: Touching back on the history of the specific process that we have gone through on these sites in the last year.
It was actually back in 2005 that we started discussions with the staff regarding the site on 232nd. An application was made
prior to the close of 2005, and we began to have hearings with the neighbors in the spring of 2006. We used a mailing list
around our site of 500 feet. We chose 500 feet, which is 200 feet more than the City mandates, because we wanted to discuss
this with the neighbors. We wanted to be open and go out of our way in having meetings with the neighbors. That way we
put our mailing list at 120 names versus 30 names. We have submitted a mailing list for this current rezone in compliance
with the City’s criteria of 300 feet, and there’s only 30 names on that mailing list. We did four times the amount of mailing
for our multiple meetings that we had with neighbors petitioning their input and discussing the project parameters. We have
modified the project, responding to their concerns that were raised in these multiple meetings that we had at Westgate
Chapel. We had, I believe, three or even four meetings at Westgate Chapel, a couple of meetings, one at SGA’s office, one at
my office, and two meetings at City Hall. This was discussed at our last, and I didn’t want to re-discuss this point, yet I think
in lieu of some of the letters that have been received by the Board, I wanted to bring to light some of the history that we have
gone through on this project.
Packet Page 239 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 4
Mr. Shapiro: I don’t mean to pat ourselves on the back. I want to say that we seriously were discussing this with the
neighbors and trying to respond to concerns that they had raised regarding the scope of the project. With that, I think, and the
other issue is about the spot zone, that we are creating spot zones. I would like to discuss from my vantage point as an
architect that the City created this Edmonds Way Comprehensive Plan. This was not written by us. It was written by the
Planning staff, enacted by the Planning Department or by the Planning Board and the City Council. We, in turn, did apply it
to different segments of Edmonds Way, yet there was never any zone written in response to this Comprehensive Plan. It
strikes me that if you have a Comprehensive Plan designation yet don’t craft specific zoning language for that
Comprehensive Plan designation, what is the use of having a Comprehensive Plan designation. If you cannot respond to
some specifics or certain aspects within the goals of that comp plan, but just regurgitate, if you will, existing zoning language
that applies for say BC downtown, where Edmonds Way is an entirely different context. I would ask the question, why
create a new Comp Plan?
Mr. Shapiro: With that, I would like to briefly touch upon the site and go through these components. The question’s been
raised about how far the Edmonds Way designation goes. As we can see on the map here, this is Highway 99 here and
extends all the way down into here. This is the Westgate area where this other site was that we talked about. Our subject site
is right here. So I’ll just flip through these very quickly. These are some other context photos. This is the Westgate
Commons, what we are calling the Westgate Commons site next to the carwash. Edmonds Way here, and this site here, our
site’s right up the street. Westgate Chapel. This is just solely for context to help us grasp where we are talking about. This
is our property right in here and 232nd that’s across State Route 104. This is looking at the corner of our site and 232nd
heading up the hill. Westgate Chapel’s right in this location here, and this is our property here. This is further up the street
towards Highway 99. This happens to be this condominium complex here, which is in Snohomish County yet it has similar
characteristics that the standard RM zone designation currently embraces. We have surface access out here that is exposed to
the road and garage doors that face the street, and I believe there is some surface parking out here in this area.
Mr. Shapiro: So touching back further up the street towards 99, some other condominium projects that are not totally out of
character with what we are proposing to do in terms of mass. This is the comp plan map, starting here at Highway 99,
coming down Edmonds Way to Westgate and the carwash at this location, Westgate Chapel and our subject property is right
in this location.
Mr. Shapiro: We have written out some verbiage on this. These are our parcels here. We hope to rezone this to BC-EW
and this is this segment. The blue segment is the RM-EW. This portion of the site is characterized by significantly higher
grade changes down here. We have over 20 feet grade change from here down to here. And down here, the slopes are less
steep yet they are still significant. I think we are still looking at 10 feet plus down in this area of the site. But we were
hoping not to really get into project specifics, but talk about in general, the zone characteristics of this property and why we
feel that the rezones, that were created in close discussion with the Planning Staff. The idea that somehow we pushed this
language through, we had multiple meetings with Mr. Chave and Steve Bullock and Meg Gruwell on this, and worked
through multiple different points and concerns that were raised and came up with new concepts of sustainable design. We
recognize that the sustainable design can be improved upon, and we hope that new amendments and changes can happen in
incorporating new features in this, and new teeth and new aspects in sustainability. This is the first stab at it, and we hope
that it makes a step in the right direction in working this through. Yet there seems to be undue criticism saying that, you
know, this is just thrown in there to address concerns raised by some people. Yet we are definitely working to work in
sustainable design with gray water, pervious paving, and other aspects that we want to incorporate into this project.
Mr. Shapiro: I would like to just go through some of these points. The light lettering is the actual verbiage out of the comp
plan, and the goals for the corridor essentially stress that the intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not
interfere with the flow of traffic and adjoining established communities. The preliminary staff review and our traffic
consultant indicate that this traffic would not impact, nor would a rezone intrude upon the adjacent neighborhoods. Gibson
Engineering, Ed Koltonowski, will come up and talk briefly about some of those points at the conclusion of my talk.
Mr. Shapiro: Another point in the Comprehensive Plan discusses permit uses in planned multi-family or small-scale
business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. Currently, there are 10
curb cuts on Edmonds Way entering the single-family houses that currently exist. There’s five single-family houses on
Edmonds Way that we are eliminating. We will cut that down to two off of Edmonds Way and compress and combine these
Packet Page 240 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 5
curb cuts. That will go a lot way towards minimizing traffic impact to Edmonds Way. We also feel that the one curb cut that
we hope to get access on 232nd would access a residential only garage that would serve apartment units off of 232nd.
Mr. Shapiro: Another goal of the comp plan is to provide for transit and pedestrian access to the development. We have
direct access both to the town homes at the north end of the site and the mixed-use building, pedestrian access into the
property. With only 2 curb cuts, the conflict between pedestrians and cars is minimized. This is a long stretch of road, and
we feel that by having only 2 curb cuts, we have minimized conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles in this way.
Mr. Shapiro: We do also believe that another point is that permitted uses in the BC-EW zone is consistent with the housing
of small scale business developments already along Edmonds Way and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals of
creating useable business space along Edmonds Way, but also at the same time, a diversity of housing uses.
Mr. Shapiro: Another point of the comp plan goals is to use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways
and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic. Site access should not be
provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. We, ultimately, hope to have essentially over 60 units
on this project, 40 of which will be apartments, 20 of which will be condominiums. The idea that accessing part of this
project to 232nd is somehow a misuse of 232nd I think is an extreme proposal. The idea that somehow we will bring in
residential only traffic off of 232nd where across the street is a veterinary hospital as well as a small office building on the
other side of 232nd directly across from our site. Yet, we are only proposing housing access into our property. I think we
could coexist very nicely with these adjacent properties as well as the neighbors down the street.
Mr. Shapiro: Another goal of the comp plan is to use design review to ensure the development provides a transition to
adjacent residential neighborhoods as well as to make use of the natural topography to buffer incompatible development
when possible. We believe that by working with this site, we can mass our buildings in such a way that say a 4-story
building that faces Edmonds Way has only a 2½-story presence against the single-family zones to the west of us; hereby
working with the topography to mask, if you will, the larger scale buildings against the busy arterial.
Mr. Shapiro: So let me just flip through a few of these. I should have been following this with my discussion. With that, I
would like to move into the existing zoning map. You can see here that the existing BC zone down at the south end is where
we would like to rezone to the BC-EW, and then the five lots to the north. There’s only four lots, I think there’s five actually.
But to the north is the RM-EW. I would briefly like to just run through some of the goals and how we respond to the
concerns and objectives raised in the rezone.
Mr. Shapiro: Is the proposal consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance? We feel that by providing a variety of
housing types and a range of greater densities to meet the needs of a broader range of Edmonds residents, we will have both
town homes in the RM zone and then we have apartments in the BC zone. The town homes will probably range in size from
1,200 feet to 1,500 feet, and one and two-bedroom units. So there is a variety of unit types that we hope to incorporate into
the project, as well as the commercial space at the ground level. The RM-EW zone encourages environmentally friendly
features and helps ensure quality design features. The new zone strongly encourages extensive use of sustainable design and
utilization of green technologies, as well as supporting pedestrian friendly neighborhood complimentary design such as front
doors facing the street and below building parking. That is one of the goals that we want to incorporate in the town homes, as
well as in the mixed-use building that surface level parking would be minimized. We have visitor parking that is exposed,
yet it cannot be seen from the street, but it is outside the buildings.
Mr. Shapiro: Another goal for the RM-EW rezone is the relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land
uses and the zoning of surrounding or nearby property. Rezoning the site to RM-EW will enhance surrounding properties by
allowing substandard homes to be replaced with new town homes. Since much of Edmonds Way already contains multi-
family housing, the 232nd Street town homes would fit nicely along Edmonds Way and the grade change would help
minimize any impact of the town homes on adjacent single-family zones. We have met with immediate neighbors, in fact,
Claudia who we have met with on a couple of occasions, and she has some concerns to express. Yet we have worked with
her and tried to describe to her some of the impacts that the project would have. We hope that we have responded to her
concerns about the adjacent town homes viewing into her site from a privacy issue.
Packet Page 241 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 6
Mr. Shapiro: Another question that the City raises, has there been significant change in the character of the immediate
surroundings or area or in City policy to justify the rezone. I would suggest that with the growth that this region is
encountering and is going to encounter in the coming decades, the idea of achieving higher densities and different housing
types in this area is going to support and enhance the livability of Edmonds and bring in new residents and replace existing
single-family homes that are in a dilapidated state. Single-family homes on Edmonds Way is, I don’t believe, a desirable
land use.
Mr. Shapiro: Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the
existing zoning and under the proposed zoning. We definitely that it is suitable. I think one of the aspects of this site and a
lot of the properties along Edmonds Way is the narrow nature of these properties. Edmonds Way, as we are all aware, has
significant grade change between itself and the adjacent single-family properties. It also has resulted in a narrow nature of
these lots. These are single-family lots, by and large, except for the parcel at the south end of the site against 232nd. It is a
sawtooth arrangement. The ability to place a large apartment block into this location, should that have been desired, would
be very difficult. We do believe that the physical nature and geography of this site supports the notion of this rezone.
Mr. Shapiro: Another point raised is value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the
potential increase or decrease in the value to the property owners. We feel that this rezone will enable us to replace these
existing houses and provide more homes, responding to the demographics of Edmonds, bringing in a younger population and
have more affordable housing. We are not saying this is low-income housing, but compared to the mean average house that
we find in Edmonds, this will be a more affordable condition than we find in the bowl or in most of Edmonds, for that matter.
The rezone would allow the applicant to bring in approximately 20 to 25 new town homes for the community and help
Edmonds to comply with the Growth Management mandates as well as Vision 20/20’s goals of housing with good access to
transit.
Mr. Shapiro: I think the last point we want to address. Well, this now moves onto the BC-EW rezone. We go through a lot
of the same questions. I will try to keep this brief, but I think these are important points to make into the record. Whether the
proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of
the zoning district. As buildable land decreases in Edmonds, infill sites, we have discussed that tonight, mixed-use
developments provide very viable solutions to meeting the needs of Edmonds. The idea that we have commercial activity on
the ground floor of a building, with housing above, I think is a trend we are seeing across the nation. This site lends itself
lends itself very nicely to that type of solution. The BC-EW was adapted from the BN designation, yet we are all aware of
the limitations of the BN designation of one unit per site. Yet we are trying to incorporate some of the goals from the BN
designation, which would meld commercial with some housing form. We feel that the BC-EW designation is compatible
with the character of Edmonds Way by maintaining a neighborhood orientated design sensitivity in context with the fact that
Edmonds Way is a key transportation corridor.
Mr. Shapiro: The surrounding area and the relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning
of surrounding and nearby property. The BC-EW zone would allow for the site to embrace both the business of Edmonds
Way street frontage and the neighboring residences above the project and providing a buffer between Edmonds Way and the
single-family. I think, acoustically, this would be a benefit where the mixed-use building is going to be sited, that will help
buffer acoustical noise from Edmonds Way to the single-family properties to the west. Also, as we discussed before, the
mixed-use development is consistent with putting the commercial traffic on the ground floor and residential activity more on
the upper floors, in conjunction with the single-family properties to the west.
Mr. Shapiro: Changes. Whether there have been significant changes in the character of the immediate surroundings.
Again, the same points made with the RM zone we feel applies to the BC zone in this case. With the Council decision to
create these new zones, specifically in response to meeting the policy goals of Edmonds Way via the comp plan and it also
relates to the need for housing diversity and business space creation in the subarea in manners not provided for in the
previously existing zones. BC-EW addresses such issues as height, massing, setbacks, landscaping and buffering. We have
setback language worked in to the zoning language that sets back the upper floors, say floors three through four have to be set
back even further from the street edge than floors one through two, helping to reduce the massing of the building against the
street. You might recall the photo we have of Westgate Chapel has essentially a sheer wall that is almost four stories tall.
We will be stepped back from Edmonds Way, lessening the impact, and that is built into the zoning language. J
Packet Page 242 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 7
Mr. Shapiro: Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable. We believe that the south end of
the site, with the large lots that is there, does lend itself very nicely to a mixed-use building. Again, criticism has been raised
toward the solution that we had presented in the past where we access 232nd to get into the upper parking deck of the floor.
One neighbor, in particular, feels that we should bite the bullet if you will and put a ramp inside our building. We feel that
we front on 232nd and the concept that we access 232nd to bring in housing and parking off of this street, which is a residential
street, is not incompatible with the other housing up and down Edmonds Way, up and down 232nd. Our traffic consultant will
address concerns raised about through traffic perhaps, which this project will have minimal impact upon, as well as perhaps
widening the street at 232nd enabling a left-hand queuing turn to occur at 232nd onto Edmonds Way, which we feel will
enhance traffic flow for the neighborhood in general.
Mr. Shapiro: And the last point raised is the value and relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the
potential increase or decrease in the value to the property owners. We do not feel that the property owners are reaping a great
gain with this change. We are helping to enhance the buildable nature of this site, yet at the same time, to have this four-
story building on Edmonds Way is not incompatible with a 20,000 car a day thoroughfare. We feel that the massing step
backs and the setbacks mandated in the zoning criteria would help minimize the visual impact of the building against
Edmonds Way. With that, I would like to ask that Edward Koltonowski to come up and discuss some of the traffic impacts
and his traffic study that we submitted also with this rezone application.
Mr. Koltonowski: My name is Edward Koltonowski with Gibson Traffic Consultants, 1712 Pacific Avenue, Suite 100,
Everett, Washington. I have been doing traffic engineering for over 15 years, Gibson Traffic Consultants being in
Snohomish County for over 20 years. I have an undergraduate in Transportation Plan and a Masters from the University of
Washington in Civil Engineering Transportation. I would actually state I have probably attended more open houses and
meetings on this project than I have in my whole 15 years of experience. There’s certainly been a very open discussion and
you know, positive and negative in both ways, and much of it was centered around traffic, which is great because that’s what
I love doing. I would much rather listen to traffic and discuss traffic than other issues.
Mr. Koltonowski: We have studied this project and its impacts. The way we looked at this because we know that this is
kind of a rezone, but what we asked Tony to do is to let’s look as project specific as possible. What’s the most intense use
you would realistically have on this facility so that we can look at what the most intense traffic impacts could be. We
followed the standard guidelines by the City, which are nationally recognized for trip generation as to how many trips, how
many vehicles per hours, how many vehicles per day would come from these types of units houses, these types of
commercial that could be there and actually allocated those specifically to, in this case, 232nd for the apartment units and SR-
104 specifically for the condominium and the retail. So we could realistically look at a most representative impact. You’ve
actually got a copy of the traffic study in front of you that’s being reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer, as well. He
primarily concurs with our results. There is one issue that I will address afterwards.
Mr. Koltonowski: But where I would go first is that the traffic study looked at the level of service at the intersection. It
looked specifically at the impacts of this development to determine the impacts to 232nd with this access that is proposed onto
232nd was, in general terms, very minimal. There was an increase in traffic as there would be with any development, but the
traffic on 232nd today is relatively low so percentage wise, it would be an 8% increase to the west of the access and a 12%
increase of traffic to the east. What does that realistically mean? What we looked at to the west of the access on 232nd, what
that would mean is during the worst hour of the day, the p.m. peak hour, 9 peak hour trips. That means one vehicle about
every ten, sorry about every five to six minutes one vehicle on 232nd west of the apartment’s access. East of the apartment’s
access, as the majority of traffic is destined to the east, there would be 16 to 17 additional vehicular trips. Now you are
talking about one every two to three minutes on that leg of 232nd.
Mr. Koltonowski: Now, putting that into perspective, let’s see on SR-104 presently you have got over 2,000 trips an hour or
20,000 trips during the day. So that kind of gives you a perspective as to right next to 104, what the actual impacts there, and
obviously there are well below 1% of impacts on SR-104, itself. Vehicular trips of 1 every six minutes or 1 every two
minutes during the worst hour of the day, the peak hour, is again, probably not noticeable unless you are actually waiting
there and counting them if you are traveling that road yourself. You are probably not even going to notice unless someone is
actually turning in front of you at the 232nd driveway.
Packet Page 243 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 8
Mr. Koltonowski: We did make a recommendation, however, and said, okay, let’s look at the eastbound approach at this
intersection of SR-104 and 232nd Street. What’s the most potential impact again, well this most intensive type of
development with the worst case. . . We always call it the worst case and developers call it the best case, i.e. getting the most
trips because they’ve got the most units. But in this we are calling the worst case situation of as much traffic on 232nd, what
could be the impact. We looked at the delay impact is how it’s determined for the eastbound approach, is the most impact
that can be analyzed. If you do have the traffic study in front of you and you look at Table 4, which is immediately after the
figures, the tables come after the figures. You would see on Table 4, what we determined was presently the eastbound
approach is about 16 feet wide, and 16 feet is about enough at the intersection that a vehicle can squeeze by. If there’s an
eastbound left turn vehicle. . . Can I put this up? So if this is orientated from the apartment, which is shaded or cross hatched
there, eastbound. So in this case, well we are showing four, all of this is west of the access, with 30% for the apartments.
Mr. Koltonowski: So the project site here, in this case, our distribution shows we got of the apartment traffic only, 30% of
the traffic. We’ve got what would be during the peak hour 3 westbound trips, 4 eastbound trips coming into the apartment
with access here. For the apartment’s traffic or the other traffic, is primarily heading down towards Seattle, 405, I-5, 99,
we’ll have like 8 trips during an hour coming back into the apartment site and four people going out, whether it be to retail or
shopping or recreation, coming out in the afternoon. So that’s just a general description of that. But for our level of service,
as you can see on Table 7, eastbound, this approach, which is critical in front of our site, we determined there was like 16
feet. So at the moment, if someone was taking a left turn from the access here, taking a left, a courteous driver would pull
over to the left hand side right next to the center strip and allow still people to make that right turn past that driveway. Now,
some people aren’t necessarily as courteous and some people don’t necessarily recognize that they are blocking the whole
intersection and such, so that happens.
Mr. Koltonowski: What we determined if we can provide 20 feet of an approach, which can be restriped as 10 feet or left as
20 feet, if it’s restriped as 10 feet then that clearly puts the left turn vehicle outside of here. The majority, vast majority of
trips, vehicles approaching that eastbound are destined down to 99, I-5, and very few people are actually taking this left
anyway because if you wanted to go up in this direction, the residents who are already in this location, they come up this
way. No one whose on the road here in their right mind is doing that. So there’s only a few trips on that left turn movement
anyway. What that means is by providing this widening, we clearly take that left turn vehicle out of the vast majority of the
traffic flow, and we actually improve the delay on the eastbound approach to remove actually the incurred delay that we
expect through other developments in this area. So we actually reduce the delay. Presently, we would reduce it from 32
seconds per vehicle of average delay down to 27.8 seconds of average delay, which actually brings it back down to almost
existing type of conditions, which today is 23.1 average seconds of delay in the eastbound direction. So we kind of almost,
we not only mitigate our development’s traffic impacts on 232nd, we actually mitigate the other growth that’s occurring in
this area. Because there’s infill that has occurred in various little places here and also expected additional infill just as a
background growth through these areas. So that’s kind of a really long-winded way, just because I say I love to talk about
traffic, of showing that we’ve mitigated our impacts on this kind of development, if we do that kind of improvement.
Mr. Koltonowski: The one issue that I talked about earlier on that I have with the discussion in here, and I don’t know if
this is project specific or what Mr. Sims, because I only saw his comments today. We made a recommendation based on the
analysis in the traffic report, that if you want to go down to the details and I do like details. . . If you look at the 8th page back
from the traffic report, you will see, and I do apologize. Typically, we number these pages, and I let that slip through the
system. But on the 8th page back, it should be headed at the very top there, you will see where it ends up synchro future
width plus channelization synchro 7. How we spell stuff stills baffles me, but this is how we . . . What we are talking about
here is future W plus Chan. Syn. 7, which is a future with channelization improvements at 232nd Street southwest of the . . .
Mr. Koltonowski: What we had recommended, because of the amount, so this is actually year 2013, looking out into the
future, with all the project trips added, with the future pipeline as in growth rates added, and this is the report from the
computer, black box and all that system, we used to have to do by hand, and now luckily it does it about 50 times faster.
Where it also reports, and this is where we get our delay calculations down here for the eastbound approach, so we’ve got the
eastbound, EB, left turn, eastbound through. Basically, this is the eastbound, so you see here eastbound approach. Our
calculation, and this is where the delay comes from the eastbound level of service D approach is 27.8. Here what’s called
queue length. This is what’s called the 95% queue length. That means that 95% of the time or 95th percentile of the queue
Packet Page 244 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 9
will be less than this number of feet, so it’s 26, which basically you represent 20 feet in the car, and therefore, that’s just over
one car’s length. We recommend, therefore, that there be about 50 feet of channelization.
Chair Guenther: All right, we appreciate your excitement of this, but the hour is getting later, and we would like to. . . If
you could summarize and finish up quickly please.
Mr. Koltonowski: I will. So you have got 26 feet, we recommended 50. At the moment the comment that came back
indicated 75 feet of channelization. That is something that, based on your report, there is no evidence or whatever for 75 feet.
The analysis and everything that it shows is a maximum of 50. So again, my question was right at the beginning is if this
condition that is being put on this, it should be based on fact, and the facts are, at the moment, the most intense development
that would be there with this access would not require more than 50 feet of channelization at that approach. That actually
concludes, so you caught me just before I was about to finish anyway. But I appreciate me taking you right to the limits, so
thank you. If you have any questions, I would be delighted to answer them.
Chair Guenther: I don’t see anybody having any.
Ms. Noyes: Could you spell your last name for me?
Mr. Koltonowski: Oh, K O L T O N O W S K I.
Ms. Noyes: Thank you.
Chair Guenther: At this point, we open this hearing up for public testimony if there’s any members of the public that would
wish to approach the podium, make any comments or testimony for or against this application. Please come forward.
Board Member Young: Questions or anything?
Mr. Abbott: My name is Jim Abbot. I reside at 16218 – 6th Avenue Northwest in Shoreline. I am one of the owners of the
property, so I am not sure whether you consider me a member of the public or not. I just wanted to make a couple of quick
comments. I know the hour is late, but I don’t know whether you feel that’s appropriate or not at this time. So I thought I
would ask first.
Chair Guenther: We are not going to stop you from talking, but it’s probably more of an applicant than a member of the
public.
Mr. Abbot: Well, I’m just here to answer any questions. As I said, I am a resident of Shoreline, but I’ve owned commercial
property in Edmonds since 1986, and I am one of the owners of the property. So if there’s any questions about anything
you’ve heard. . . I would like to reiterate that we’ve had eight neighborhood meetings. The issues were traffic on 232nd,
which you’ve heard plenty of now and the mass and size. But I really think this zone, the EW zone, particularly on the
corner, that this property has about a 26-foot grade change between our immediate neighbor and Edmonds Way, and so that’s
why we felt this is very appropriate for this particular piece of property. Thank you.
Chair Guenther: I will close the public testimony. Does the applicant have any rebuttal? Any other further comments? No
he doesn’t. Does staff have any comments?
Mr. Chave: No. I mean there’s only one minor correction. The Edmonds Way Corridor was actually established back in
the mid 90’s. What the applicants did in, I think 2001 and 2002 sounds about right, the corridor designation was extended
through these properties. The original corridor was further east towards 99, but the most recent amendments really extended
the corridor all the way up to Westgate Center, so that was the most recent change. But otherwise, nothing further.
Chair Guenther: Board comments?
Board Member Young: How about questions?
Packet Page 245 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 10
Chair Guenther: Or questions, yes.
Board Member Young: Okay, I have two for the staff and then one for the applicant’s representative. When was this area
annexed into Edmonds, Rob, approximately.
Mr. Chave: I couldn’t even tell you approximately.
Board Member Young: Okay, but it’s been relatively, I mean 10 years, or was all of the big annexation west of there?
Mr. Chave: Let me see if I can tell.
Board Member Young: I am just trying to get a sense for how long some of the infrastructure around there has been only
up to County standards as opposed to City standards.
Mr. Chave: You know, I would have to actually go back and look at a map to find that.
Board Member Young: It’s been a while?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, I mean, the areas closer to Westgate have been in for obviously a very long time. Some of the areas
further east though, came in in the mid 90’s. Quite honestly, where the exact boundary is, I don’t recall.
Board Member Young: But it hasn’t really been brought up to City code if you will, from what I can tell from the maps and
having driven through there.
Mr. Chave: Yeah, I think these properties have actually been in the City earlier than the mid 90’s. I’ll defer to the applicant
on that, but I think this particular area has been in for a long time, probably back to the 80’s. Nonetheless, whenever it was
annexed, you can bet it was largely developed at that point. That’s why when you look at the land use pattern in the area,
there are quite a substantial number of duplexes and so forth that were built in the County. So the development pattern was
largely established quite some time ago.
Board Member Young: And then the other one is, we received some correspondence here, and part of it was from Gary
Gibson where it says these new zones were created without the benefit of Comprehensive Plan review. How does that. . . I
don’t get what that means. I thought the comp plan was the Edmonds Corridor designation and the issue was what zones fit
under that corridor designation and what the specifications were, what we were considering at the last time and what the city
Council did, was what the specifications were for those zones underneath the Edmonds Way Corridor Comprehensive Plan
area.
Mr. Chave: No, you are correct. The zones that were established were intended to implement the Comprehensive Plan, so
Comprehensive Plan review was absolutely critical to establishing the zones.
Board Member Young: Okay, I was sure it was, but I didn’t want to have this letter go onto the record without having that
sort of counterpoint onto the record, as well. Now, my question for the applicant’s representative.
Chair Guenther: Mr. Shapiro.
Mr. Chave: If you are going to technical. . . Just a technical point, you are going to have to open the . . .
Chair Guenther: I haven’t closed it yet.
Board Member Young: This is deliberation. I think we can go back and ask the applicant or the applicant’s representative
something if we want to. This is just a point of clarification on something.
Chair Guenther: I didn’t close the hearing yet.
Packet Page 246 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 11
Board Member Young: This isn’t really public testimony anyway. How do you like that Tony, you are part of the public.
You are an applicant’s representative. Take that.
Board Member Young: This same letter indicates that the applicant, for all intents and purposes, that would be you,
conceived that due to the loss of rentable space that would result from the parking requirements. This project, if this rezone
cannot, will not, your choice, support the types of businesses that would occupy the mixed-use building in the, now let me
see here, in the commercial zone. . . What’s going to go in the ground floor of these buildings? Let’s just stick to the case
here.
Mr. Shapiro: Well, you know, it’s very difficult to. . . It’s a speculative building, and unless you are an owner-occupied
building, all buildings generally are speculative. The idea that somehow we can stipulate, at this juncture of the design and
development process, what tenant is going to occupy the space is practically impossible. I mean, it’s almost like if you build
it they will come. That is very true for retail space. This is not specifically retail space, but most buildings, once they get
under construction or developed, then kind of arrive. The idea that somehow the tenants that we have there could not serve
or would not be there to serve the neighbors, I think is a misunderstanding of the situation.
Board Member Young: Again, that’s for like your benefit or the benefit of the record here, too. Because, you know . . .
Mr. Shapiro: The idea that a veterinary hospital or an architects office or an insurance company or even a stockbroker or
financial planner does not serve the immediate neighborhood where a coffee stand or a small food store does, I think is a
difference in point of view that most of the public might not embrace.
Board Member Young: Okay, I just wanted to know whether you were just saying that . . . I mean I wanted clarity on there
that there’s going to be some commercial space, and it might be an architect’s office and it might be a coffee shop, but you
don’t know at this point.
Mr. Shapiro: Well, that’s right. I think with the coffee shop, the density of parking . . .
Board Member Young: Well, professional office versus retail, I guess is what I’m getting at.
Mr. Shapiro: Right, I mean, we probably cannot support many types of retail, but at the same time, we aren’t saying that
retail cannot go in there, either.
Board Member Young: Okay. I just wanted that. . . Sometimes this stuff comes out in the record sort of funny. Okay,
those are the only questions I had.
Board Member Reed: I have a couple of things, Tony. Maybe one is for Rob. There is not a first floor ceiling height
requirement in these new zones in the BC-EW, is there.
Mr. Chave: No.
Chair Guenther: I don’t think we have a ceiling height requirement anywhere in our code. I think what we have had in the
past, is we have talked about a ceiling plate, which is supposed to refer to a floor-to-floor height. I don’t think we specified
anywhere in our building code or our zoning codes what the height of the ceiling should be.
Mr. Chave: We have a ground floor requirement in the BD zones, but those don’t apply here.
Board Member Reed: Is there anything like that in the BN zone, either, as long as I asked the question? Okay.
Mr. Shapiro: Let me just mention that with the current concept that we are trying to develop, we have a 14 foot floor-to-
floor between the commercial space on Edmonds Way and the parking level above.
Board Member Reed: My real question, though, has to do with site access and traffic. I went up there a couple of days ago.
I am one of the unknowledgeable people who drove back down 232nd and wanted to turn left. It’s a very scary turn when you
Packet Page 247 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 12
are coming down the hill. Then somebody came up behind me and I didn’t realize I wasn’t over far enough because I really
couldn’t tell where the stripe was supposed to be. But that’s a side story. The Edmonds Way BC setback requirement off of
Edmonds Way is now setback in the new zoning. Is that right?
Mr. Shapiro: Specifically, I can’t remember. I know with the upper stories, it is set back. To go to the third and fourth
story, you are set back in addition. I believe . . . I thought the original setback was four feet, and then the setbacks for the
third and fourth floor was an additional six feet.
Board Member Reed: Well, in the table it says minimum street setback, none, with no footnotes. My only observation was
that when you come down to Edmonds Way off 232nd, if the commercial space is right on the street, essentially, with a small
sidewalk, it’s a fairly straight run, but it’s still a little bit hard to see that when you are also trying to look to the right to see
whose coming. So I don’t know what your plans include, and I know we are not really supposed to get into the site, but that
was an observation that I had that I wanted to share because I could see it being an issue for people who did want to come
into town until they learn to go back through.
Mr. Shapiro: Well, I have been instructed to respond to questions like this is that we will supply the necessary data to the
engineering staff to verify site line distances when we submit for the design review and the working drawings. But I will also
say that we are intended to have the ground floor setback 10 feet right now against Edmonds Way. So we would have
actually a wide sidewalk there, a pedestrian path, and then our building starts from that point. We may have a colonnade that
may step into that 10 feet by 2 feet, yet by and large our glass line is intended to be 10 feet back from the property line facing
Edmonds Way.
Mr. Chave: The BC-EW zone is a little peculiar because the setback discussion is actually in a footnote that refers to height.
In order to . . . Basically is says that there’s street setback of four feet minimum, and then once you get up to the third and
fourth floors, they have to be stepped back an additional six feet.
Board Member Reed: Right. And the last question is, the access onto 232nd, is that going to be 20 units, you said that
would have that access in and out of the condominiums.
Mr. Shapiro: That’s right. Those are apartments. We have, I think about 40 stalls, 45 or 46 stalls on that level, and it would
be housing that would utilizing those stalls. We have 40 units above and two stalls per unit, something like that, but we also
have 40 stalls on the ground floor on Edmonds Way, as well.
Board Member Reed: Does it come out on the down slope?
Mr. Shapiro: Well, you would have to turn left and go down the hill on 232nd. No, we are practically flush. By going up 14
feet, we have to, I think, ramp up a little bit to get out onto 232nd. We set almost where we’re flush. Actually, mid point of
the driveway is actually about flush with the existing grade on 232nd at this juncture. So we will make sure that our site line
distances and transition ramps provide the necessary site lines by the City.
Board Member Reed: So that people coming down east will see that a car is coming out?
Mr. Shapiro: That’s correct.
Board Member Reed: All right. That’s all.
Chair Guenther: Any other questions or comments?
Board Member Freeman: I have one comment. I just wanted to thank you for including this LIDAR topography map in
your package. I find that this factual material like this is very, very helpful. Not trying to make something look beautiful or
anything like that, it’s just the facts put in front of us, and I found it helpful. Thank you.
Chair Guenther: At this time, I would close the hearing. I guess we deliberate and discuss how to move this forward now.
Does anybody want to make a motion?
Packet Page 248 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 13
Board Member Henderson: I move that we submit to the City Council with a recommendation for approval of File
Number R-06-95. The reason I feel that way is because the staff comments and the applicant’s comments well support the
relevant code for the zoning change.
Board Member Freeman: I’ll second that for discussion purposes.
Chair Guenther: All right. Well, let’s have discussion.
Board Member Freeman: Okay. First of all, I think we should, after our little talk earlier this evening, we should go
through and make sure that we get our findings of fact really lined up and that we go through each item there and discuss
that. That’s my suggestion.
Chair Guenther: You would like me to lead that discussion?
Board Member Freeman: Yes please.
Chair Guenther: All right, so where’s my list. All right, so the first finding of fact is the Comprehensive Plan, whether the
proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. I think that was demonstrated well. All the back up material, you know,
supported that fact.
Chair Guenther: The zoning ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and
whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. We have the RM-EW and the BC-EW, we
have the zones, and now we are applying them to this area. I believe that we are consistent.
Chair Guenther: The surrounding area. The relationship of the proposed zoning to the existing land uses and zoning of the
surrounding or nearby property. It’s been demonstrated, we had the topographic map that shows the change in the grades.
The relationship of the proposed zone would allow buildings, I guess, to be compatible to the surroundings areas. The other
uses on SR-104 would be consistent with the nearby buildings. You guys can jump in any time.
Chair Guenther: Changes. Whether there’s been sufficient change in character of the immediate or surrounding area or in
City policy to justify the rezone. I think it was shown that we have got, you know, we are going to have to accommodate
future growth in the City to accommodate the million people that will be coming into the Puget Sound area in the next 20
years. This will allow for housing to accommodate this population increase. Other changes, am I doing okay.
Board Member Freeman: Yeah, you are doing fine.
Chair Guenther: I wish I had written down the summary for all this. Whether the property is economically and physically
suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time
the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning. I
need some words for that.
Board Member Young: It’s certainly thorough enough. What happened to our six points, though.
Board Member Freeman: I had them here.
Chair Guenther: I’m reading them, but I’m . . .
Board Member Young: Oh yeah, there you go. It complies with the six points of the Edmonds Community Development
Code 20.40 as presented in the staff report and the applicant’s presentation.
Chair Guenther: And the last point, the relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential
increase or decrease in value to the property owners. I think that, as it was pointed out, this site is currently occupied by
Packet Page 249 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 14
substandard housing, and this new development would definitely be an increase in the value to the public, both in economic,
you know an improvement to the neighborhood. I think there’s value in that.
Chair Guenther: With those six points identified and discussed. . . So was your motion seconded?
Board Member Freeman: It was Don’s motion, and I seconded it.
Chair Guenther: And I expanded upon that.
Board Member Freeman: Should we not all say why we are voting for or against it? Wasn’t that one of the requirements,
too, Rob? That we . . .
Board Member Henderson: That’s why I put in that I felt the staff report and the applicant’s report explained the six points
with facts. I’m convinced they’ve done a good job of that. That’s why I am proposing approval.
Board Member Freeman: I seconded it really for discussion, but I also agree with the staff’s recommendation and that the
applicant has demonstrated that it meets these six points. Therefore, I will vote in favor of the motion.
Board Member Reed: I have one question. On Page 7 of the Staff Report, Item E under the technical committee, there’s a
recommendation that a traffic mitigation of $32,000 and change in paid as a part of this approval. Then there’s also
Comment 1 from Mr. Sims, I think it is Don Sims, which I know we’ve got two supplemental emails, too, and it’s been
discussed further about whether 75 feet is or is not necessary. I’m not sure where we are on that.
Mr. Chave: Both the mitigation fee and all the conditions they are talking about, mitigation and so forth, all that is really not
pertinent to the rezone. It’s worth noting in that it gives you some feeling about how traffic impacts could be addressed, but
ultimately, all that gets decided at the actual project approval stage. So it’s something that, you know, you can take note of
just simply because it does illustrate how traffic impacts can be handled, but all that is really fairly project specific. The
exact amount of mitigation that’s paid, if and how traffic lanes get configured, all that actually gets reviewed at the
Architectural Design Board and the subsequent SEPA stage. So it’s not something you need to condition the rezone on.
Chair Guenther: I says in that paragraph it will be applied to any future project, so this is not . . .
Mr. Chave: The zoning sets up the potential for doing a project, but you really don’t know exactly what the project specifics
are at this stage in the game.
Board Member Reed: Will you say what you just pointed out, I’m sorry.
Board Member Freeman: Can we just clarify something. We are only approving the rezone. I mean, Mr. Shapiro could
change his mind. He could sell the property or anything, so that’s why we . . .
Mr. Chave: That’s correct.
Board Member Freeman: So we shouldn’t really be discussing that?
Mr. Chave: I mean, the information was submitted, and I think it’s useful to illustrate what level of traffic impacts could
occur and how they could be handled, but it’s not something that really specifically informs what you do on the rezone.
Board Member Reed: So then, what Mr. Sims is commenting here is not a part of what we are forwarding to Council.
Mr. Chave: No, it’s illustrative. Well, it gets forwarded as part of the record. It’s illustrated. But again, it’s not something
that’s going to ultimately get decided until they are actually reviewing a specific project, which they are not doing right yet.
Board Member Reed: Okay. He put a very specific number in there, down to the penny, that’s why I guess I was . . .
Packet Page 250 of 396
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-06-95
March 14, 2007 Page 15
Mr. Chave: You know, Don was basically reviewing what he received. He received a pretty detailed report, so I think he
was responding in kind.
Board Member Reed: Okay.
Chair Guenther: Can we take a vote now? All in favor say aye.
Board Member Freeman: Aye.
Board Member Henderson: Aye.
Board Member Bowman: Aye.
Board Member Reed: Aye.
Chair Guenther: Aye.
Chair Guenther: All opposed.
Board Member Young: No. Anybody want to know why.
Board Member Freeman: I think you should put it on the record.
Chair Guenther: Yes, please say why you voted no.
Board Member Young: Actually, I sort of like it, but I’m still not convinced of two things. One, it really isn’t a spot
zoning situation. It’s one thing to say it applies throughout the entire corridor. It’s a whole other question as to whether you
can actually apply it or not. It’s similar to the question about the MPOR zone and comp plan designation on Sunset Avenue
that couldn’t go anywhere else, but it wasn’t spot zoning because it wasn’t just restricted to there. So it was defacto, if not
dejurious spot zoning.
Board Member Young: The other issue that came up tonight in the discussion with the CIP and the 80th Avenue West. The
City really doesn’t have a mechanism in place that anybody at least can understand that’s going to fund the improvements to
take care of the impacts that are going to result from this change in the neighborhood. If I had answers to both of those, I
think I would probably have to go for it because I think it’s basically a good proposal. But I don’t, you know, with out those
two issues being addressed, I would have problems thinking it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan requirements
about maintaining the neighborhood, etc. But I will just leave it at that. It’s not a strong no; it’s just kind of something,
because we need to keep those issues in front of the Council.
I TESTIFY THAT THESE VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
ABILITY TO TRANSCRIBE THE PROCEEDINGS.
__________________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Karin Noyes, Transcriber Date
Packet Page 251 of 396
Packet Page 252 of 396
Packet Page 253 of 396
Packet Page 254 of 396
Packet Page 255 of 396
Packet Page 256 of 396
Packet Page 257 of 396
Packet Page 258 of 396
Packet Page 259 of 396
Packet Page 260 of 396
Packet Page 261 of 396
Packet Page 262 of 396
Packet Page 263 of 396
93RD PL W
94TH PL W
93RD AVE W
233RD PL SW
T SW
89TH AVE W
88TH AVE W
90TH AVE W
2 3 2 N D S T S W
231ST PL SW
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
Y
92ND AVE W
230TH ST SW
234TH ST SW94TH PL W
94TH AVE W
95TH
P
228TH ST SW
94T H PL W
H ST SW
232ND PL SW
22
95
229TH PL
227TH ST SW
94TH AVE W
92ND AVE W
229TH ST SW
231ST ST SW
±300 0150Feet
City of Edmonds Vicinity Map
File # R-2006-95
Properties proposed for rezone
Subject
Properties
Single Family - Urban 1
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
Co
r
r
i
d
o
rEdmonds WayCorridorPacket Page 264 of 396
Packet Page 265 of 396
Packet Page 266 of 396
Packet Page 267 of 396
Packet Page 268 of 396
Packet Page 269 of 396
Packet Page 270 of 396
Packet Page 271 of 396
Packet Page 272 of 396
Packet Page 273 of 396
Packet Page 274 of 396
Packet Page 275 of 396
Packet Page 276 of 396
Packet Page 277 of 396
Packet Page 278 of 396
Packet Page 279 of 396
Packet Page 280 of 396
Packet Page 281 of 396
Packet Page 282 of 396
Packet Page 283 of 396
Packet Page 284 of 396
Packet Page 285 of 396
Packet Page 286 of 396
Packet Page 287 of 396
Packet Page 288 of 396
Packet Page 289 of 396
Packet Page 290 of 396
Packet Page 291 of 396
Packet Page 292 of 396
Packet Page 293 of 396
Packet Page 294 of 396
Packet Page 295 of 396
Packet Page 296 of 396
Packet Page 297 of 396
Packet Page 298 of 396
Packet Page 299 of 396
Packet Page 300 of 396
Packet Page 301 of 396
Packet Page 302 of 396
Packet Page 303 of 396
Packet Page 304 of 396
Packet Page 305 of 396
Packet Page 306 of 396
Packet Page 307 of 396
Packet Page 308 of 396
Packet Page 309 of 396
Packet Page 310 of 396
Packet Page 311 of 396
Packet Page 312 of 396
Packet Page 313 of 396
Packet Page 314 of 396
Packet Page 315 of 396
Packet Page 316 of 396
Packet Page 317 of 396
Packet Page 318 of 396
Packet Page 319 of 396
Packet Page 320 of 396
Packet Page 321 of 396
Packet Page 322 of 396
Packet Page 323 of 396
Packet Page 324 of 396
Packet Page 325 of 396
Packet Page 326 of 396
Packet Page 327 of 396
Packet Page 328 of 396
Packet Page 329 of 396
Packet Page 330 of 396
Packet Page 331 of 396
Packet Page 332 of 396
Packet Page 333 of 396
Packet Page 334 of 396
Packet Page 335 of 396
Packet Page 336 of 396
Packet Page 337 of 396
Packet Page 338 of 396
Packet Page 339 of 396
Packet Page 340 of 396
Packet Page 341 of 396
Packet Page 342 of 396
Packet Page 343 of 396
Packet Page 344 of 396
Packet Page 345 of 396
Packet Page 346 of 396
Packet Page 347 of 396
Packet Page 348 of 396
Packet Page 349 of 396
Packet Page 350 of 396
Packet Page 351 of 396
Packet Page 352 of 396
Packet Page 353 of 396
Packet Page 354 of 396
Packet Page 355 of 396
Packet Page 356 of 396
Packet Page 357 of 396
Parties of Record
R-2006-95 – Shapiro/SGA Corp.
Applicants
Abbott, Jim
Koltonowski, Edward (Gibson Traffic Consultants)
Shapiro, Tony
Public (from letters received)
Gibson, Gary
Nicefaro, Michael A.
Packet Page 358 of 396
AM-937 9.
Proposed Ordinance Amending Code Provisions Relating to Animal Control
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Mauri Moore Time:30 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Discussion of proposed ordinance amending provisions of City Code Chapter 5.05 relating to
Animal Control. Discussion will include deleting cats from the exemption of roaming at large
as well as requiring licensing of cats. (Requested by Councilmember Moore.)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
On March 27, 2007 the Edmonds City Council passed Ordinance 3634 worded as follows:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO AN
ANIMAL CONTROL BY AMENDING SECTION 5.05.010 TO ADD A NEW DEFINITION
FOR "PET" AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 5.05.110 CRIMES RELATED TO THE
CONFINEMENT OF ANOTHER'S ANIMAL AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
Narrative
Councilmember Moore has requested that a discussion be placed on this evening's agenda
amending provisions of City Code Chapter 5.05 relating to Animal Control. The discussion will
include deleting cats from the exemption of roaming at large as well as requiring licensing of cats.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Cat licensing
Link: Cats roaming at large
Link: March 27 Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:28 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 11:31 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Packet Page 359 of 396
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 04/12/2007 08:56
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 360 of 396
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
4/5/07
R:4/6/07gjz
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 5.05.025 CAT LICENSING TO REQUIRE THE
LICENSING OF CATS, ESTABLISH PENALTIES AND
REMEDIES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has contemporaneously prohibited cats from
running at large; and
WHEREAS, cat licensing is a means of identifying the owner of an animal as
well as assuring the safe and prompt return of a cat to its owner, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Code Section 5.05.025 Cat licensing is hereby
amended to read as follows:
5.05.025 Cat licensing.
A. License Required. It is unlawful for any person to own a
cat over the age of three months within the City unless the owner
has first procured the license required by this Chapter.
B. Cats Excluded From Licensing Requirements. The
licensing provisions of this section shall not apply to the following
cats:
1. Cats whose owners are nonresidents temporarily within the
City;
2. Cats brought into the City for the purpose of participating
in any cat show; and
{WSS657174.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 361 of 396
3. Cats whose owner maintains them for the sole purpose of
commercial breeding, show, boarding, so long as the cats are
restricted within a building or fenced enclosure intended and
designed only for the purpose of kenneling cats and are not
permitted to run at large.
C. The police department, or such other person, firm or entity
as authorized by the City Council shall issue a lifetime cat license.
The fee for such license shall be $10.00.
D. Non-resident License. A license may be issued to non-
residents of the City of Edmonds who reside in proximity to the
City and desire to purchase an animal license for their cat for
identification purposes. The annual fee shall be the same as set
forth above for resident cats.
E. Fee Waiver -- Service Animals. A certified service animal
may be issued a lifetime license at no charge upon the request of
the impaired owner.
F. Enforcement Procedure. All cats not licensed under this
Section, or who do not exhibit a medal identification tag provided
for in sub-section C. of this section are declared to be public
nuisances and shall be impounded as provided in ECC 5.05.126.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS657174.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 362 of 396
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS657174.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 363 of 396
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5.05.025 CAT LICENSING TO REQUIRE THE LICENSING OF
CATS, ESTABLISH PENALTIES AND REMEDIES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS657174.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 -
Packet Page 364 of 396
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
11/09/06
R:4/6/07gjz
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 5.05.050 RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITED TO
DELETE THE EXCEPTIONS FOR CATS, REQUIRE THAT
THE CUSTODY OF CAPTURED STRAY ANIMALS BE
TURNED OVER TO THE ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY,
AND FIX A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, current City ordinance prohibits pet and animal owners from
allowing their animals to run at large, but creates an exception for cats; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that stray cats and cats allowed to run at large
pose a risk to public safety by contributing to the spread of disease and the killing or injury of
wild life such as bids, squirrels and other small animals; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to reinstate a requirement that persons
taking up stray animals turn such animals over the animal control authority or police within 24
hours; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Code, Section 5.05.050 Running at large
prohibited is hereby amended to read as follows:
5.05.050 Running at large prohibited.
A. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person have charge,
care, custody or control of any animal to allow such animal to run
at large during any hours of the day or night. This section shall not
{WSS645775.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 365 of 396
apply to dogs owned by the City or other law enforcement
agencies and maintained as police K-9 units while under the
custody and control of the trainer or handler. Any animal found
running at large may be seized and impounded.
B. It shall be the duty of a person who takes into their
possession any stray animal not owned by them or not placed in
their possession by the person having the lawful custody and
control thereof, to notify the animal control authority or police
within 24 hours and to release such animal to the City officer upon
demand and without charge.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS645775.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 366 of 396
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5.05.050 RUNNING AT LARGE PROHIBITED TO DELETE
THE EXCEPTIONS FOR CATS, REQUIRE THAT THE CUSTODY OF CAPTURED STRAY
ANIMALS BE TURNED OVER TO THE ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY, AND FIX A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS645775.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 -
Packet Page 367 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
March 27, 2007
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Olson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Mayor Pro Tem
Ron Wambolt, Council President Pro Tem
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
STAFF PRESENT
David Stern, Chief of Police
Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Debbie Dawson, Animal Control Officer
Carl Nelson, Chief Information Officer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt requested Item I be removed from the Consent Agenda and
Councilmember Plunkett requested Item G be removed.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, FOR
APPROVAL OF THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #95004 THROUGH #95183 FOR MARCH 22, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $833,409.80. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND
CHECKS #44617 THROUGH #44669 FOR THE PERIOD OF MARCH 1 THROUGH
MARCH 15, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $909,024.34.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM CAROL FRANKLIN
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED) AND TIMOTHY CIPOLLA (AMOUNT
UNDETERMINED.
E. REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE EDMONDS MEMORIAL
CEMETERY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF
PROJECT.
Approve
3/20/07
Minutes
Approve Claim
Checks
Claims for
Damages
Edmonds
Memorial
Cemetery
Packet Page 368 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 2
F. AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE 2007 STREET OVERLAY
PROGRAM.
H. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH MACLEOD RECKORD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS FOR
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARK
MASTER PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
SERVICES.
J. REPORT ON FINAL PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE CITY BUILDING
ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT.
K. ORDINANCE NO. 3633 - ADOPTING A NEW SUBSECTION D INTO EDMONDS CITY
CODE 8.51.020 DEFINING TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT; ADDING A
NEW SECTION 8.51.042 TO CHAPTER 8.51 ECC ENTITLED TEMPORARY
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT - VALIDATION REQUIRED.
City Attorney Scott Snyder requested a brief Executive Session to discuss the items that were removed
from the Consent Agenda. At 7:30 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Olson recessed the Council to a 15 minute
Executive Session to discuss pending/threatened litigation. The meeting was reconvened at 7:19 p.m.
ITEM G: AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE ABATEMENT AND DEMOLITION
OF THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 23700 104TH
AVENUE WEST
Councilmember Plunkett advised questions had arisen that City Attorney Scott Snyder needed additional
time to address.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
DEFER THIS ITEM UNTIL NEXT WEEK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM I: AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC. FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
TO UPDATE THE EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt relayed that at a Port Commission meeting yesterday, citizens and
Commissioners expressed dissatisfaction with the restroom facilities along the waterfront. He asked if the
scope of this item could include an assessment of the restroom facilities on the waterfront and determine
whether additional restrooms were needed. He recalled the Port Commissioners expressed interest in
restrooms at the dog park and at Marina Beach. He noted there were also comments that the restroom
facilities at the underwater park were not maintained and were in a constant state of uncleanliness. Parks
& Recreation Director Brian McIntosh agreed it could include this assessment.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PLUNKETT, FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM I. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF BOYS & GIRLS CLUB WEEK, MARCH 25 - 31, 2007
Mayor Pro Tem Olson read a Proclamation declaring March 25 – 31 as Boys & Girls Club week and
presented the Proclamation to Bill Dalziel, Boys & Girls Club Director.
Mr. Dalziel thanked the Council for their support of Edmonds youth, advising the Boys & Girls Club was
part of a larger operation with over 4,000 clubs in the United States. He explained the Boys & Girls Club
2007 Street
Overlay
Program
Old Woodway
Elementary
Park Planning
City Building
Energy
Improvements
Ord# 3633
Temporary
Employee
Parking Permit
Executive
Session re:
Pending
Litigation
Demolition of
Old Woodway
Elementary
Parks, Recrea-
tion & Open
Space Comp
Plan
Boys & Girls
Club Week
Packet Page 369 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 3
had been a member of the Edmonds community since 1968 and currently had five sites – four elementary
schools and the Club – that serve approximately 1200 youth per year. The Boys & Girls Club planned to
continue to be a part of the community and maintain a positive place for kids. He emphasized adults were
role models for youth and the youth were the leaders of tomorrow, future employees, employers,
neighbors and families in the community.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson commented her nephew had benefited from attending the Boys & Girls Club
before and after school programs.
4. ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU
Amy Spain, Snohomish County Tourism Bureau, provided statistics regarding tourism in Snohomish
County including a 10.6% growth in tourism in 2006 for a total economic impact of $746.7 million. She
described:
• 14,202 requests for information generated by advertisements,
• increase in web visitors to Snohomish.org, SnohomishCountyWedings.com and RoomsAtPar,
• decreased visits to Visitor Information Centers,
• relatively flat off-season program bookings compared to 2005,
• increased group and convention room nights,
• increased hotel occupancy levels,
• increased hotel/motel tax collections, and
• increased media coverage.
She commented on the impacts of tourism in Snohomish County on restaurants, transportation, fuel, retail
stores, recreation and entertainment as well as employment and local and state taxes.
Ms. Spain provided examples of advertisements the Bureau placed in meeting planners, reunion and
group tour-related publications and displayed the group tour guide and meeting & event guide. She
commented on familiarization tours and sales missions the Bureau provided. She described trade shows
Bureau staff attended that generated leads, assistance staff provided to groups with their conference
needs, and meeting planner bids the Bureau prepared for group businesses. She reported on lost
convention business in 2006 and displayed a chart illustrating the economic impact of hotel room nights.
She reported on Amtrak’s in-kind donation of a companion fair coupon. She also reported on the
economic impact of sports related bookings in 2006.
Ms. Spain commented on distribution of official visitor guides, season calendars, Farm Trail Guides, and
Glimpse of Snohomish County promotional pieces. She described public relation and media efforts,
volunteer hours and services provided at Visitor Centers and donations from area businesses. She
described decreasing visits to Visitor Centers as the public increased their use of online websites and as
communities opened their own Visitor Information Centers. She also described the Bureau’s community
relation efforts during 2006 that included sponsoring six countywide tourism-related programs as well as
participating as a donation site for Toys for Tots and food drives. She summarized tourism was a huge
economic driver in Snohomish County tourism and was improving every year.
Councilmember Moore inquired about the Bureau’s efforts associated with the 2010 Olympics in
Vancouver and how Edmonds could participate. Ms. Spain described the SnoGold 2010 effort, a
grassroots organization which includes a Tourism Committee that she co-chairs as well as a
Communications Committee and a Business Development Committee. The Business Development
Committee is working on preparing businesses to accommodate the influx of visitors and how to become
suppliers to the needs of the Olympics. The Tourism Committee is preparing an inventory of attractions
and special events during the Olympics and Paralympics time period and discussing how to better market
Snohomish Co.
Tourism
Bureau
Packet Page 370 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 4
those events nationally. She relayed statistics that the majority of U.S. visitors to the Olympics would be
from the western states, many of whom would be driving. She commented on the need to manage
expectations, noting although there would be additional visitors, their focus will be reaching BC.
Councilmember Moore recalled Idaho benefited greatly from the Olympics in Salt Lake City including
hosting foreign teams. She referred to skating rinks in Snohomish County and asked how Edmonds could
pursue that effort. Ms. Spain advised of a Community Strategy for Team Hosting Workshop on April 11
at the Everett Event Center. She advised the Business Development Committee is working on hosting
teams as well as team demonstrations/exhibitions in Snohomish County. She encouraged anyone
interested in being more involved in the SnoGold 2010 to contact her.
Councilmember Marin found the presentation impressive, particularly the indication that it was not only
hotels that benefited but there was a trickle down effect on communities. Ms. Spain agreed, noting
shopping was the top tourist activity and Edmonds was a wonderful destination for shopping as well as
walking and art and culture. Councilmember Marin asked her to relay the Council’s thanks to her staff
and volunteers.
Councilmember Dawson thanked Councilmember Moore for raising the issue of SnoGold, recalling the
Council discussed that effort at the retreat. She envisioned the City becoming more involved with the
Business Development Committee in the fall.
5. REPORT FROM THE COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CTAC)
Bart Preecs, Chair of the CTAC, introduced John Hines and John Gates, members of the CTAC in the
audience. He explained there had been a significant citizen effort on the CTAC. He thanked Community
Services Director Stephen Clifton, Administrative Services Director Dan Clements, and Executive
Assistant Cindy Cruz for their assistance. He also thanked the Council, commenting this was uncharted
territory; there was no recipe for developing a broadband system and it took courage and vision for the
Council to take a leadership position in this effort.
Rick Jenness, CTAC member, presented the CTAC vision, “Build an ultra high speed interactive
broadband network, available to every home and business in the City, capable of delivering service from
multiple competing servicing providers.” He reviewed the benefits of a broadband network that include
reduced costs to residents and businesses, providing enhanced public and commercial services along with
more service plan choices to citizens, providing increased competition among service providers, creating
an economic development magnet for high tech businesses to the City, and stabilizing and enhancing
current City revenues from service providers
He reviewed an historical timeline:
• 2002-2004 – vision evangelized to Mayor and Council
• November 2004 – Council creates CTAC
• June 2005 – WSDOT deeds 4-mile (from the ferry to Hwy. 99) fiber backbone to the City
• December 2005 – City acquires Westin fiber to Snohomish County line
• November 2006 – City completes WSDOT fiber to Westin fiber link, providing fiber from the
ferry terminal to the Westin
• December 2006 – City issues RFI to gather information from commercial entities (18 firms
express interest)
• January 2007 – 12 firms attend vendor pre-bid conference
• March 1, 2007 – City acquires first customer to utilize Westin link
• March 2, 2007 – City receives eight formal responses to RFI
Community
Technology
Advisory
Committee
Packet Page 371 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 5
• March 16, 2007 – City selects four firms for oral presentations (Bechtel/Motorola, DynamicCity,
NetRiver/PacketFront, and Nortel)
He reviewed a future timeline:
• April 10 & 11, 2007 – oral presentations by Bechtel/Motorola, DynamicCity,
NetRiver/PacketFront, and Nortel
• April 14, 2007 – Committee completes evaluation of responses
• May 4, 2007 – Council, Mayor, staff and committee issues Statement of Direction with regard to
where the City wants to go next
Mr. Jenness explained possible next steps include 1) creating a public entity to begin planning activities
who would engage a partner firm, business case development, begin planning a pilot project and 2)
expanding the marketing activities of the existing infrastructure to generate additional revenue.
Councilmember Moore expressed her gratitude to the citizens serving as volunteers on the CTAC. She
found this to be the most important initiative the City has seen in a long time. With regard to what CTAC
wanted the Council to do next, she asked if they planned to bring it to the Community Outreach
Committee or to the full Council. He commented several Councilmembers attend CTAC meetings, thus
they have had good input from the Council. He suggested the process could possibly include discussion
by the Finance Committee prior to consideration by the full Council.
Mr. Preecs explained the goal had always been not just to establish the infrastructure but to identify how
to use that infrastructure to promote civic and cultural aspects of the community as well as the practice of
government.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt, who serves on the CTAC along with Mayor Pro Tem Olson,
acknowledged when this effort first began he was skeptical until he discovered the members of the CTAC
knew what they were doing. He noted the members were very capable people with years of experience
who were spending a great deal of their own time on this effort. He expressed his thanks to the CTAC for
the time they were donating to the community.
6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised this matter was returned to the Council at their direction. He recalled
on February 20, the Council directed the preparation of an ordinance that specifically precluded the
trapping of pets and companion animals and provided protections with an amendment to provide for a
professional trapping option which he assumed from Council discussion would be via the City’s Animal
Control process. He explained the Council’s direction presented several drafting challenges:
1) The difficulty for the City’s Prosecutor to prove a pet was intentionally trapped. To address this
in the ordinance, he provided a range of penalties. The intentional trapping of a pet by another
would be a gross misdemeanor with the penalty of a year in jail and $1000 fine. Negligent
confinement, leaving an animal in a trap, would also be a misdemeanor.
2) Imposing criminal penalties on activities that are clearly prohibited under civil laws of the State.
The City as a code city has the authority to impose those limitations, if a problem arises, the
courts defer to that judgment and findings are rarely overturned. He explained the ordinance
would remove the most effective tool that a real property owner had to protect his/her property
from trespass.
3) Although the City has 7-day per week animal control coverage, it was not 24-hour a day coverage
and the Animal Control Officers also provide services to another City by Interlocal Agreement as
well as serve as parking enforcement. He noted both the public and Council have expressed a
Amend Code
Provisions re:
Animal Control
Packet Page 372 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 6
concern with releasing an animal from the trap and the possibility of Animal Control Officers
leaving a trap unattended for 12-14 hours raised issues.
Mr. Snyder explained the ordinance he drafted allowed the City’s Animal Control Officers to trap and
fulfill their duties with regard to feral cats and injured animals. The ordinance includes an extensive
section on the use of private contractors and provides a process for property owners that includes
notifying the neighbor if the ownership of the trespassing pet is known, sending a letter to the
neighborhood if ownership is unknown, and once that had been accomplished, authorizing property
owners to utilize a private contractor list to trap an animal. He noted the process for identifying
contractors would be similar to the City’s process for identifying towing companies. He pointed out the
difficulty of providing trapping as a service under the City’s existing levels; the intent of the draft
ordinance was to avoid a budgetary impact. He explained after a pet owner was notified their animal was
trespassing and did not take reasonable steps to keep the animal at home, the pet owner could be guilty of
a civil infraction. He noted although the property owner would have to pay the cost of trapping initially, a
judge would have the ability to assess the costs of trapping to the pet owner.
Mr. Snyder acknowledged this was much more than the Council asked for; however, the short approach
would do nothing more than provide an illusion of control. He advised a more limited version, Version
B, was also provided that had no pet owner responsibilities. With regard to a question regarding the
definition of pet, Mr. Snyder advised the definition was taken from the Webster’s dictionary. He advised
that staff’s recommendation remains the same, finding there was insufficient public issue to justify
regulation and view it as involving the City in essentially a neighbor dispute between a pet owner and a
real property owner. To provide a legislative history in the event of a challenge, he requested the Council
emphasize in their discussion the public benefit to be obtained and the problem to be solved.
Councilmember Dawson commented whether or not the City enacted an ordinance that established the
responsibilities of a pet owner, the law still applied and a real property owner could civilly sue a pet
owner. Mr. Snyder agreed. Councilmember Dawson noted if the Council did not adopt Version B, they
would not be abrogating common law that required people not allow their animals to trespass on another’s
property. Mr. Snyder agreed. He explained another problem with drafting the ordinance was unless it
was a crime for a cat to roam at large, a cat was not doing anything illegal by roaming at large, thus there
were constitutional issues with authorizing the City’s Animal Control Officer to trap to abate a civil
nuisance. It would need to be a criminal or public nuisance to involve Animal Control personnel.
Councilmember Dawson recommended if the Council chose to adopt Version B, the portion of the title in
Section 5.05.110 “and the abatement of private nuisances” be deleted. Mr. Snyder agreed.
Councilmember Dawson commented although this was an issue that did not arise with any frequency,
now that it had arisen, she feared the public may believe it was acceptable to trap pets which she did not
want to allow. If the Council did not want to allow trapping, she asked whether staff recommended the
Council adopt Version A or B. She noted Version A was more detailed and may be overkill and may
require more staff time to do an RFQ, etc. Police Chief David Stern recommended the less cumbersome
option, Version B. He noted Version A created specific intent crimes that required a particular state of
mind at the time the crime was committed. In his experience few prosecutions would occur under that
statute. He noted there was no significant history of this type of action in the City, this was the first one
he was aware of and the only one the City’s 20-year Animal Control Officer was aware of.
For Councilmember Dawson, Chief Stern confirmed staff felt Version A which included the ability to
contract with a trapping service was unnecessary. In addition, he was only aware of one potential
contractor who would qualify to trap animals.
Packet Page 373 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 7
Councilmember Dawson asked if there had been instances where a person had intentionally trapped their
neighbor’s pet for ill intent. She noted trapping and torture of animals was an indicator of more violent
behavior. Chief Stern acknowledged there were people without the values most of the community had
with regard to pets but that was an infrequent occurrence. Councilmember Dawson commented if
someone were intentionally trapping animals, it would be a public safety concern that could be addressed.
Chief Stern agreed.
Councilmember Marin questioned the merits of option A and B versus an Option D which would be to do
nothing and retain the existing provisions. Chief Stern answered due to the infrequent nature of this
incident, the existing provisions were adequate to address the situation. He assured staff would carry out
whatever direction the Council provided.
Animal Control Officer Debbie Dawson answered Animal Control handled a variety of animals including
dogs, cats, rabbits, goats, and chickens every day, and all were handled the same within the laws of the
City. Any animal running at large was subject to enforcement action. If a person has an animal on their
property, they often call Animal Control and they pick up the animal. She summarized their role was to
protect pets; if the regulations were not changed, they would continue to pick up all types of pets.
Mr. Snyder commented when Mr. Martin first brought his complaints forward, Chapter 50.5 was being
amended. There had previously been authorization to provide traps. Staff determined that was no longer
in the ordinance and removed the statement from the City’s website and stopped providing traps.
Councilmember Plunkett commented under Version B very little change would occur other than a person
could not trap animals and therefore a person would either call Animal Control or humanely shoo the cat
away. He asked whether staff had only been called out once in 20 years to deal with a cat. Chief Stern
clarified 40% of the Animal Control calls were in regard to cats, predominately stray cats; this was the
first case involving these specific issues. If trapping were prohibited, Councilmember Plunkett did not
envision an increase in Animal Control’s workload. Chief Stern also did not anticipate any significant
increase.
Councilmember Plunkett commented in Version B it was still permissible for people to trap
stray/feral/wild cats for the purpose of caring for them. Mr. Snyder answered that was allowed in both
ordinances.
For Council President Pro Tem Wambolt, Chief Stern advised 40% of Animal Control’s calls were
related to cats, 59% were related to dogs and 1% to rabbits, goats, guinea pigs, etc. Council President Pro
Tem Wambolt assumed some of the calls regarding cats involved a resident complaining about a
neighbor’s cat in their yard. Chief Stern agreed that did occur. Council President Pro Tem Wambolt
assumed staff was able to adequately satisfy the parties involved using the existing ordinance. Chief
Stern agreed they were.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
FOR APPROVAL OF VERSION B VIA ORDINANCE NO. 3634 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
THE LANGUAGE MR. SNYDER AGREED SHOULD BE STRICKEN IN REGARD TO THE
ABATEMENT OF PRIVATE NUISANCES.
Councilmember Dawson urged the Council to support Version B, agreeing it would be extremely
difficulty to prove someone intentionally trapped a neighbors pet. Although it would be a rare
occurrence, this was an opportunity for the Council to send a message that trapping a neighbor’s pet was
not appropriate and that there were other ways to address the issue. She noted a cat leash law was not the
issue. As a cat owner herself, she did not allow her cat outside and believed that was a pet owner’s
responsibility to keep their cat confined due to the dangers to a pet from wild animals. She opined
Ord# 3634 –
Amend Code
Provisions re:
Animal Control
Packet Page 374 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 8
Version B allowed the Council to send the message that it was not appropriate to trap animals as a form of
abatement, whether as part of a neighborhood dispute or in circumstances where the intent was to
maliciously harm the pet. She appreciated Mr. Snyder’s effort to draft Version A, however, staff did not
find that level of detail necessary.
Councilmember Marin spoke against the motion, recalling he was the Chair of the Public Safety
Committee when this issue arose. The Committee agreed with Chief Stern that it was a dispute between
neighbors that did not require amendment of the ordinance and should be addressed on a neighbor-to-
neighbor level. He preferred to restore the language in the ordinance regarding property rights and
protection of the animal which could have been accomplished by Version C. If Version C could not be
adopted, he preferred Version D, do nothing and allow neighbors to settle disputes themselves.
Councilmember Plunkett commented although the issue arose via a dispute between neighbors, it did not
lessen the opportunity for a public policy to address the issue. He preferred it be addressed via ensuring
the humane treatment of pets as well as the rights of property owners and stating the obligations of the
Police Department. He summarized there was a public policy issue to be resolved, not a dispute between
neighbors. He supported Version B due to the larger legislative and community issue.
Councilmember Orvis expressed his support for the motion. He advised trapping was legal now; the
Public Safety Committee wanted to regulate it and input from the community indicated a desire to ban
trapping. He noted the letters the City received were predominately opposed to trapping of cats including
one letter that referred to an incident 20 years ago that lead to community meetings, a situation he wanted
to avoid.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt commented he had come full circle on this issue; when this was
discussed the last time, he supported staff developing further regulation. He now believed nothing needed
to be done.
Councilmember Moore spoke in favor of the motion for the reasons Councilmember Dawson stated. She
noted this began as a neighborhood dispute but had progressed beyond that and became a policy issue.
She regretted the relationship between neighbors had been harmed by this issue.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson supported Version D, do nothing, pointing out this had not been a problem in the
past. She objected to creating more layers of government, more work for Animal Control and for the
Council to micromanage operations. If trapping of cats was rampant, she could support changing the
ordinance but noted that did not seem to be the case.
Councilmember Dawson commented it appeared the three Councilmembers who did not support the
motion were not supportive of trapping animals. Thus the City should prohibit trapping if it was not
acceptable to the Council. She reiterated the unlikelihood of prosecutions, but found it an appropriate
message to send. She suggested Council President Pro Tem Wambolt and Mayor Pro Tem Olson who did
not support trapping, consider supporting the motion to send a message that trapping was not appropriate.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson pointed out the property owner who had cats coming into their yard did not get
much help from the City to address the issue.
Councilmember Moore sympathized with people who had cats coming into their yard. She expressed her
dislike for cats, noting there had to be a better way to address that situation.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, MOORE,
DAWSON AND PLUNKETT IN FAVOR AND MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON, COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PRO TEM WAMBOLT AND COUNCILMEMBER MARIN OPPOSED. The
ordinance approved is as follows:
Packet Page 375 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO AN
ANIMAL CONTROL BY AMENDING SECTION 5.05.010 TO ADD A NEW DEFINITION FOR
“PET” AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 5.05.110 CRIMES RELATED TO THE CONFINEMENT
OF ANOTHER’S ANIMAL, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mary Leake Schilder, PAWS, Lynnwood, commended the Council for making great strides in this
matter and encouraged them to include an educational component. She described PAWS efforts to
educate cat owners about the importance of keeping cats “safety confined” so they did not roam free. She
described dangers to free-roaming cats including wild predators, cars, parasites, disease, and cruel people.
She advised only 3% of cats turned into shelters as strays were returned to their owners. She noted cats
who avoided danger were a threat to birds and small wildlife. She described methods for safely confining
cats including an outdoor enclosure, install a special addition to a fence to keep the cat in the yard, walk
the cat on a leash, provide enrichment for indoor cats and only allow a cat outside when supervised by a
human family member. She advocated proper identification for cats including microchips. She noted as
more cat owners realized their responsibility to keep their pets confined, Edmonds would see a decline in
neighbor disputes, funds spent on animal control services and more families would enjoy the
companionship of their pets.
Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, displayed the 1969 Comprehensive Plan. He advised the Hearing Examiner
made a decision against the resident group’s appeal; the court case for appeal by the Association, Case
No. 07203221, would be heard in Snohomish County on May 1. He recommended the buildings on the
former Woodway Elementary School site not be demolished until the court case had been concluded. He
referred to a letter sent to Chief Stern regarding problems on the former Woodway Elementary School site
and Chief Stern’s reply that the Police Department would do their best to patrol the area. He
recommended nothing be done with regard to the property until the issues were cleared up. Next he
recommended the Council schedule consideration of term limits on an upcoming agenda. He also
expressed appreciation to those who supported the Kiwanis Club’s food drive last week at Top Foods.
Robert Chaffee, MD, Edmonds, commented he was surprised and disappointed that the Council made a
decision before discussion with the public. As the Council had eliminated trapping, he recommended
instituting a leash law for cats. He cited problems they encountered from cats digging in their garden,
leaving surprises, and killing birds. He noted the bigger problem was feral cats, and the Council had
eliminated trapping as a method of rehabilitating feral cats. He quoted a policy statement from the
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) that encouraged and supported actions to eliminate
free roaming, abandoned and feral cats due to the significant impact they had on the mortality of birds,
small animals, reptiles, amphibians and fish as well as the spread of disease. The AVMA supported the
reduction of the number of free roaming, abandoned and free-roaming cats via humane capture and
placement in homes, which he noted was eliminated by the ordinance the Council adopted. The AVMA
supports State and local agencies adopting and enforcing ordinances that encourage cats to be kept
indoors, in an outdoor enclosure or on a leash. He summarized his goal was not to keep all cats indoors
but to control problem cats and their owners and in the long term decrease the number of cats allowed
outdoors and help solve the feral cat problem.
James Anable, Jr., Edmonds, an attorney practicing animal law in Seattle, spoke on behalf of Robert
McCallum. He explained the scope of his practice has included drafting and commenting and suggesting
changes to codes at the state and local level. He referred to the common law regarding trespass,
recommending the City strike the exclusion of cats from the at-large provision. He circulated several
Confining Cats
Old Woodway
Elementary Site
Term Limits
Food Drive
Trapping of
Cats
Changes to
Code re:
Animal Control
Packet Page 376 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 10
photographs of Mr. McCallum’s experience with cats in his yard. He explained Mr. McCallum kept quail
as pets; after having 16 killed last year, he built a protective enclosure. On Saturday he awoke to find a
cat trapped inside the enclosure, raising the issue of whether with the adoption of this ordinance Mr.
McCallum would be guilty of the criminal offense of trapping a cat. He recommended placing the burden
on the pet owner rather than the property owners that experience trespass. He noted a survey of
Woodway, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace indicated they included cats in the at-large provision. He
cited dangers to at-large cats, commenting if the City was concerned with cruelty and animal welfare
issues, they would regulate cats the same as other animals.
Debbie McCallum, Edmonds, expressed concern with granting cats complete freedom to trespass on
neighboring property to engage in behavior that polluted parks and yards with animal waste and depleted
wildlife, to engage in the offensive behavior of spraying to mark territory, spreading diseases that can be
transmitted via soil, and not requiring licenses and tags. She pointed out citizens did not appreciate their
well-tended gardens being compromised by cats or discovering the remnants of a bird or small animal,
but most attempted to maintain a harmonious relationship with their neighbors. She explained they asked
the neighbor on several occasions to keep their cats from their property and were told to get rid of their
bird feeders, that the cats’ free reign took precedence, that the quality of the cats lives superseded any
damage to their property and because there were no laws, they would have to put up with the cats. She
summarized it was appropriate for the City to establish at-large restrictions, fines and license fees to apply
to domestic cats. She expressed frustration the Council had taken away a property owner’s ability to keep
a cat off their property.
Robert McCallum, Edmonds, echoed Debbie’s comments, finding the public was treated unfairly
tonight by not having an opportunity to speak to the Council before the Council made its decision. He
referred to the question posed to Animal Control Officer Debbie Dawson, noting when she responded to
cat nuisance problems, there was no satisfaction for the property owner because cats were excluded from
the at-large provisions. He cited an instance when cats slaughtered his birds in his front yard. He
circulated photographs of his yard where they encourage wildlife, birds, and Douglas Squirrels. He
questioned his right to request a neighboring property owner keep his cats off his property, explaining he
was unsuccessful because there was no law prohibiting them from roaming at-large. He did not advocate
trapping cats but questioned how property owners could obtain any satisfaction. He described his efforts
to keep the cats off his property, beginning with talking to the neighbor and when that was unsuccessful,
setting the trap in accordance with Animal Control’s directions. He acknowledged the cat was injured but
it was now at home while his birds were dead. He suggested Mayor Haakenson veto the ordinance.
Elisabeth Larman, Edmonds, congratulated the Council on making a difficult decision, to prohibit
trapping. She commented a property owner raising birds had a responsibility to build an enclosure to
protect the birds. She complimented Officer Debbie Dawson, describing her efforts to fine a dog owner
whose dog attacked her; the dog is now kept on a leash.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, pointed out the Council failed to enact a cat license and leash law. He
recommended equal treatment for dogs and cats. Next, he urged the Council to hold a public hearing with
regard to parks and specifically the former Woodway Elementary School site before any building
demolition occurred. With regard to the Mayor vetoing the ordinance, he noted Mayor Haakenson could
not veto it because he was not present and seemed to be absent quite frequently. He recommended
establishing a system for tracking comp time for department directors. With regard to establishing a
broadband system, he did not agree with pursuing such a system due to changes in programs/technology.
He questioned whether the CTAC had considered the technology used by Clearwire.
Vickie Purretta, Feral Cats Project, commented there were many grassroots organizations involved in
trapping feral cats who have spayed/neutered over 30,000 cats. She pointed out there were humane ways
Changes to
Code re: Cats
Changes to
Code re: Cats
Changes to
Code re: Cats
Changes to
Code re: Cats
Old Woodway
Elementary Site
Technology
Committee
Trapping Feral
Cats
Packet Page 377 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 11
to trap cats, noting that covering the trap served to calm the animal. She was concerned they would be
unable to continue their efforts to spay/neuter the large feral cat population, advising there were 720,000
feral cats in the Puget Sound area. She advised she had assisted with trapping animals in Edmonds at no
cost to the City.
Councilmember Plunkett assured the ordinance the Council passed did not prohibit trapping of feral cats.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson advised Mayor Haakenson was absent because he had the flu.
8. INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS
Councilmember Orvis reported the recent meeting of WRIA 8/Salmon Recovery Council included
election of officers and discussion regarding items that were funded in the past and issues to be resolved
by the Legislature.
Councilmember Dawson reported SnoCom, the 911 dispatch center for South Snohomish County, was
continuing efforts regarding interconnectivity with SnoPak. They have applied for a grant to assist with
that effort which they learned recently was the granting agency’s top priority. She advised a tentative
agreement had been reached in an ongoing lawsuit with past employees of the center regarding overtime.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt reported on the March 12 and March 26 meetings of the Port
Commission where they approved a 3-year agreement with Northwest Country Management for
continued management of Harbor Square and reviewed their financial results for 2006 which indicated the
Port had approximately a $2 million profit last year. He advised Woodway honored the Port for receiving
the Marina of the Year award.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson reported South Snohomish Cities is holding a dinner on April 26 with the
Snohomish County Councilmembers. She urged Edmonds Councilmembers to attend.
Councilmember Marin reported the Sound Transit Board was moving toward finalizing the second phase
of a ST2 and RTID package and revising their financial policies to allow build out over the next 30 years.
He advised Sound Transit was in a public comment period that would help finalize the elements of the
final package that will be presented to the voters in November; to date they have received 6,000
comments. He reported the Snohomish County Tomorrow Steering Committee was meeting tomorrow to
discuss annexation principles that were developed by a subcommittee. He advised the Hwy. 99 Taskforce
did not meet this month, awaiting information from Snohomish County regarding annexation.
Councilmember Plunkett reported at the Parking Committee, Municipal Court Judge Doug Fair relayed
the difficulty jurors experience with parking downtown. The Council approved a temporary jury parking
permit on tonight’s Consent Agenda.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Olson thanked staff for their assistance with the retreat, especially Senior Executive
Council Assistant Jana Spellman and City Attorney Scott Snyder.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt advised CTAC has considered Clearwire as well as many other past,
present and emerging technologies. He encouraged citizens commenting on this topic to obtain additional
information.
WRIA 8/
Salmon
Recovery
SnoCom /
SnoPak
Port
Commission
South
Snohomish
Cities
Sound Transit
Snohomish Co.
Tomorrow
Parking
Committee
Council Retreat
Technology
Committee
Packet Page 378 of 396
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 27, 2007
Page 12
Councilmember Moore referred to the comments by Development Services Director Duane Bowman
regarding her remarks about overruns on the 220th Street project. While it was acceptable for citizens to
take the Council to task, she found it inappropriate for staff as it was the Council’s responsibility to
question without receiving an overly sensitive response from staff that questioned the motive or methods.
With regard to the 220th Street project, she pointed out the first mistake was to omit the left turn lane, a
design fault that was passed by engineers and the contactor accepted responsibility, likely to avoid the
loss of future business from the City. The second mistake was using the City’s former Traffic Engineer
who resigned to work for the contractor which cost the City an additional $140,000. The explanation was
he had so much expertise with the project that he was the only one and the best one to finish the project.
She questioned what would have happened if he had died, whether the City’s engineer would not have
been able to step in and manage the construction project. If not, perhaps a change was necessary to
ensure every employee had someone who could fill in for them in the case of an emergency.
Councilmember Moore commented her questions regarding the 220th Street project were legitimate; it ran
over time and over budget. She pointed out the Performing Arts Center cost three times as much and
finished on time and on budget, questioning why the City should not expect the same from this project.
She concluded the Council should not be disparaged by staff for stating their opinion and how things were
done in the City. She suggested the Mayor may want to provide some additional training for Directors.
She noted the vast majority of the City’s staff were hardworking and loyal; she hoped their loyalty did not
drift into unbecoming public challenges of Councilmembers’ opinions.
Councilmember Moore referred to the Council retreat where the main topic was the City’s financial
future. The Council was presented with the same projection that has been provided for the past two years,
with the same decreasing balance scenario. She explained although the City managed to piece the budget
together year after year, the City would soon begin consuming the $2 million reserve which she found
was critical to maintain to protect citizens in the case of an emergency. She asked the Council at the
retreat to consider creating long term goals/strategic plan/vision. She recommended both the Mayor and
the Council have a plan and if their plans did not agree, the Mayor and Council should compromise and
reach a consensus on a strategic plan.
Councilmember Moore recalled at the retreat the Council was asked to indicate what taxes they wanted to
increase and what cuts in services they could accept. She preferred an alternate approach – creating a
strategic plan to grow the income of the City in ways that did not burden the taxpayers. She pointed out
this was being done throughout Washington; she provided a copy of the Snohomish County Business
Journal that recognized the Mayor of Marysville for his vision and strategic planning. She acknowledged
the City was in competition for sales tax dollars from surrounding cities.
Councilmember Moore concluded the citizens of Edmonds deserved to know the City’s plan for the
future. She recommended establishing at least a 15-year plan with annual goals so that the Council could
report annually on their accomplishments especially if there were cuts in services or increases in taxes.
She invited citizens to urge the Council to start working on a strategic plan. She acknowledged because
this was an election year it may not be appropriate to begin working on a strategic plan this year, but
recommended it begin next year.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
220th Street
Project
City’s Financial
Future
Strategic Plan
Create 15-year
Plan
Packet Page 379 of 396
AM-944 10.
Proposed Interim Ordinance Implementing New Design Review Process
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:15 Minutes
Department:Development Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance establishing a period in which to prepare an application and forms of
decision.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed ordinance setting May 15, 2007 for a public hearing on the proposed ordinance.
Previous Council Action
On April 6, 2007, the City Council passed Ordinance 3636 implementing design guidelines and a
new design review process.
Narrative
The effective date of the Ordinance 3636 (April 13, 2007) does not allow staff time to prepare
handouts and procedure forms to implement the ordinance. The City Attorney drafted the proposed
ordinance (Exhibit 1) to address this concern. The ordinance sets a public hearing for May 15,
2007 on the interim ordinance. The City Attorney will be present to address questions regarding
the proposed ordinance.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Interim Ordinance
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/13/2007 09:42 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/13/2007 09:46 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/13/2007 09:56 AM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 04/13/2007 09:17
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/13/2007
Packet Page 380 of 396
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
4/5/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A PERIOD IN WHICH TO
PREPARE AN APPLICATION AND FORMS OF DECISION,
AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has enacted Ordinance No. _____ providing for
alternative paths for ADB applications; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 20.12 ECDC establishes a new process for which
application forms and decision formats need to be developed, and
WHEREAS, the City’s planning staff is currently short-staffed due to attrition;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to provide for a thirty-day period to develop
appropriate forms; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 provides for the establishment of interim zoning
controls; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. In accordance with the authority created by RCW 36.70A.390, the
following procedures are hereby established as an interim zoning control.
1.1 The Planning Department shall accept applications for
development pursuant to newly adopted Chapter 20.12 ECDC,
acknowledging receipt of such applications and fees.
{WSS657164.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 381 of 396
1.2 A thirty-day stay on processing of any applications is
hereby established in order to permit the staff an opportunity to
accomplish the tasks set forth in paragraph 1.3.
1.3 On or before the end of the thirty-day period, staff shall
report to the City Council regarding forms for application, rules of
procedure to govern Phase I and Phase II of the new hearing
process, and a decisional format designed to incorporate the
requirements of the Chapter.
Section 2. A public hearing regarding this interim zoning ordinance and the
material to be developed by the staff pursuant to Section 1 above is hereby set for May 15, 2007
at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard before the Edmonds City Council.
Section 3. Unless sooner dissolved by act of the City Council, the provisions of
this ordinance shall automatically expire on May 16th, 2007 at 5:00 PM.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
{WSS657164.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 382 of 396
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS657164.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 383 of 396
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A
PERIOD IN WHICH TO PREPARE AN APPLICATION AND FORMS OF DECISION, AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS657164.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 -
Packet Page 384 of 396
AM-934 11.
Non-Represented Compensation Policy
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Debi Humann Time:15 Minutes
Department:Human Resources Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Approval of Non-Represented Compensation (NRC) Policy.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
The Non-Represented Compensation Policy has been reviewed by City Staff through a focus group
process, by the Finance Committee on several occasions, previously by City Council, and again by
Council at the Retreat held this past March. The NRC is coming before the full City Council for
approval and implementation retroactively effective to January 1, 2007.
Previous Council Action
See above.
Narrative
The compensation policy for non-represented employees has been a subject of discussion for
several years. The current policy, the L-5, which was approved by Council in 2000, was
considered an improvement over the previous compensation strategy. As we have all discussed,
the L-5 had some inherent problems. The NRC combines the positive aspects of the existing L-5
policy with improvements to the identified problem areas.
The attached materials include the updated Non-Represented Compensation policy, the 2007
Banding Chart which reflects the updated ranges for all positions, and the worksheets for both the
Police Chief and the HR Assistant position.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: NRC Policy
Link: 2007 Banding Chart
Link: 2007 Police Chief Wksheet
Link: 2007 HR Asst Wksheet
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:28 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 11:31 AM APRV
Packet Page 385 of 396
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 11:31 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 11:50 AM APRV
Form Started By: Debi
Humann
Started On: 04/11/2007 05:21
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 386 of 396
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
City of Edmonds
PERSONNEL POLICIES
SUBJECT: NON-REPRESENTED COMPENSATION POLICY
The City’s non-represented compensation policy strives to maintain equity in pay for all
employees, offers competitive salaries to attract high level applicants, offers internal equity to
foster long term retention of valuable employees, and rewards meritorious job performance for
deserving individuals.
BANDING (Internal Equity Component) -
The City’s non-represented compensation policy covers all non-represented positions in eight
different bands as follows:
Band A:
Police Chief, Fire Chief, Administrative Services Director, Public Works Director, Community
Services Director, Parks and Recreation Director, and Development Services Director
Band B:
Assistant Police Chief, Assistant Fire Chief, Human Resources Manager, City Engineer,
Economic Development Director
Band C:
Planning Manager, Assistant Administrative Services Director, Building Official, Assistant City
Engineer, Fire Marshal, City Clerk, WWTP Manager
Band D:
Chief Information Officer, Transportation Engineer, Court Administrator, Water/Sewer Manager,
Street/Storm Water Manager, WWTP Supervisor
Band E:
Facilities Manager, Parks Manager, Storm Water Engineer, Cultural Services Manager,
Recreation Services Manager, Fleet Manager, Assistant Building Official, Engineering Program
Manager, Senior Planner
Band F:
Executive Assistant to the Mayor, Planner, Engineering Specialist
Band G:
4/13/2007dlh
Packet Page 387 of 396
Page 2
Assistant Planner, Recycling Coordinator, Executive Assistant Confidential
Band H:
Human Resources Assistant
The salary for each position shall remain within the boundaries of the specific corresponding
band. The bands are consistently held at a 50% width.
METHOD/APPLICATION (External Component) –
Annually, to be completed no later than September 1 of each year, the non-represented bands will
be realigned based on a market survey of two positions; the highest paid non-represented position
and the lowest paid non-represented position. This process will involve the following:
1. Determining the highest paid non-represented position (Band A) and the lowest paid non-
represented position (Band H).
2. Complete a market based survey of the two positions using the comparable cities from
King, Snohomish, and Pierce Counties as determined by the HR Committee in 2000
(Attachment 1). The survey will include successfully comparing our positions with four
cities directly above Edmonds by population and with four cities directly below Edmonds
by population. The level 5 position (or median) will be determined with the median
salary becoming the new maximum for the band.
3. The remaining bands (B through G) will be consistently spaced between Bands A and H.
ANNUAL INCREASES –
Non-represented staff are eligible for two increases a year as follows:
Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA):
As part of the annual budget process, each band is eligible for a COLA on an annual basis when
approved by City Council. COLA shall be awarded following the annual market based survey
and any necessary adjustments of non-represented bands.
Annual Merit Increase:
Merit increases may be awarded to non-represented employees based on performance as follows:
• 1% - Meets Standards –
Performance consistently meets job requirements and goals are achieved as stated in the
annual evaluation or work plan.
• 2% - Commendable –
Performance is consistently above adequate skill levels. Goals are achieved often beyond
expectation.
• 3% - Distinguished –
dlh4/13/2007
Packet Page 388 of 396
Page 3
Performance is consistently and significantly beyond established standards. Goals are
achieved at an outstanding level and exceptional skill levels are consistently
demonstrated.
For exceptional meritorious performance, over and above distinguished, the Mayor has the
authority to award a merit increase up to a maximum of 5% with appropriate justification from
the Department Director. At no point shall employees be allowed to exceed the band maximum.
RECRUITMENT -
For external recruitment purposes, the band range will consist of the established band minimum
up to 50% of the band width as the maximum (the mid-point of the band). New employees shall
be hired at no more than 5% above their current salary not to exceed 50% of their specific band.
In rare situations in which the position can not be filled, or when internal salary compression is a
component, the Mayor has the authority to negotiate a starting salary that may exceed the mid-
point within the band width.
APPEALS –
If a non-represented employee believes they have been incorrectly placed within the band
structure, or has another pay equity issue, they may bring the issue forward to their direct
supervisor and/or Department Director. If the Director finds the issue has validity, he/she will
appeal to the Mayor to determine whether the position has been placed inappropriately, from a
financial and from a responsibilities/job tasks standpoint, within a designated band. If, upon the
conclusion of the review it is determined that an adjustment is warranted, the Mayor has the
authority to correct position placement within the bands as appropriate. No other appeal process
is available.
dlh4/13/2007
Packet Page 389 of 396
Non-Represented Compensation Policy
2007 Banding
$134,760
A
$123,003
B
$111,247
C
$99,490
D
$89,840
$87,734
E
$82,002
$75,977
F
$74,165 $64,221
G
$66,327
$52,464
H
$58,489
$50,651
$42,814
$34,976
Band A Police Chief, Fire Chief, Administrative Services Director, PW Director, Community Services Director, Parks & Rec.
Director, Development Services Director
Band B Assistant Police Chief, Assistant Fire Chief, Human Resources Manager, City Engineer, Econ. Development Director
Band C Planning Manager, Assistant Administrative Services Director, Building Official, Assistant City Engineer, Fire Marshal,
City Clerk, WWTP Manager
Band D Chief Information Officer, Traffic Engineer, Court Administrator, Water/Sewer Manager,
Street/Stormwater Manager, WWTP Supervisor
Band E Facilities Manager, Parks Manager, Stormwater Engineer, Cultural Services Manager, Recreation Services Manager
Fleet Manager, Assistant Building Official, Engineering Program Manager, Senior Planner
Band F Executive Assistant to the Mayor, Planner, Engineering Specialist
Band G Assistant Planner, Recycling Coordinator, Executive Assistant Confidential
Band H Human Resources Assistant
Packet Page 390 of 396
POLICE CHIEF
2007 "L5" Salary Survey
CITY POPULATION CURRENT TOP
OF RANGE
2007
(MONTHLY)
CURRENT ADDITIONAL BENEFITS CURRENT VALUE OF
ADDITIONAL
BENEFITS
(MONTHLY$)
MONTHLY
TOTALS $
ANNUAL
TOTALS $
Federal Way 86,530 10,334 Up to 8.48% annual lump sum merit 876 11,210 134,520
Kent 85,650 10,574 $1,682 in annual mgmt benefits 140 10,714 128,568
Lakewood 59,000 10,152 6 days of mgmt leave 234 10,386 124,632
Renton 58,360 11,073 2% def comp 221 11,294 135,528
Shoreline 52,830 No match No match No match No match
Redmond 49,890 11,211 At top step, eligible for up to a 15% annual merit lump sum 1,682 12,893 154,716
Auburn 48,955 11,250 11,250 135,000
Kirkland 47,180 10,896 $225/mo car allowance, 50 hrs annual leave, paid physicals 487 11,383 136,596
EDMONDS 40,360 11,229 11,229 134,748
Sammamish 39,730 No match No match No Match No Match
Puyallup 36,360 9,514 9,514 114,168
Lynnwood 35,230 10,268 75 hrs OT, $293/mo educ incentive (Masters), $224mo in long.887 11,155 133,860
Marysville 32,150 Not available 10 days of admin leave Not available Not available Not available
Bothell 31,690 10,798 1% to RHS*, 3% def comp 432 11,230 134,760
University Place 31,140 No match No match No match
Burien 31,080 No match No match No match
Des Moines 29,020 9,547 1.52% deferred comp 145 9,692 116,304
RANKING:Recommended
Redmond $154,716 2007 L-5 Findings - Maximum 2007 Salary Range
Kirkland 136,596 Based on L-5
Renton 135,528
Auburn 135,000 Minimum/Maximum
Bothell 134,760 L5
EDMONDS 134,748
Lynnwood 133,860 $134,760 $89,840 - 134,760
Des Moines 116,304
Puyallup 114,168
*Retiree Health Savings Plan
Packet Page 391 of 396
HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT
2007"L5" Salary Survey
CITY POPULATION CURRENT TOP OF
RANGE
2007(MONTHLY)
CURRENT ADDITIONAL BENEFITS CURRENT VALUE
OF ADDITIONAL
BENEFITS
(MONTHLY $)
MONTHLY TOTALS $ANNUAL TOTALS $
Federal Way 86,530 5,251 Merit up to $4,660 388 5,639 67,668
Kent 85,650 4,532 4,532 54,384
Lakewood 59,000 4,248 4,248 50,976
Renton 58,360 5,412 $269/mo longevity premium @ 25 yrs, 2% def comp 377 5,789 69,468
Shoreline 52,830 No match No match No match
Redmond 49,890 4,117 At top, eligible for 5% annual lump sum merit 206 4,323 51,876
Auburn 48,955 4,356 4,356 52,272
Kirkland 47,180 5,020 5,020 60,240
EDMONDS 40,360 4,325 4,325 51,900
Sammamish 39,730 4527 4527 54,324
Puyallup 36,360 No match No match No match
Lynnwood 35,230 4,287 $85/mo longevity 85 4,372 52,464
Marysville 32,150 Not available Not available Not available Not available
Bothell 31,690 5,399 1% RHS*, 3% def comp match 216 5,615 67,380
University Place 31,140 4,250 4,250 51,000
Burien 31,080 No match No match No match
Des Moines 29,020 No match No match No match
RANKING:Recommended
Renton $69,468 2007 L-5 Findings - Maximum 2007Salary Range
Bothell 67,380 Based on L-5
Kirkland 60,240
Sammamish 54,324 Minimum/Maximum
Lynnwood 52,464 L5
Auburn 52,272 $52,464 $34,976 - 52,464
EDMONDS 51,900
Redmond 51,876
University Place 51,000
*Retiree Health Savings Plan
Packet Page 392 of 396
AM-943 12.
Report on Council Committee Meetings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:04/17/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committee Meetings.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached are copies of the following City Council Committee Meeting Minutes:
1. Finance Committee (04-10-07)
2. Public Safety Committee (04-10-07)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Finance Comm Minutes
Link: Public Safety Comm Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 01:52 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/12/2007 01:54 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/12/2007 03:58 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 04/12/2007 01:45
PM
Final Approval Date: 04/12/2007
Packet Page 393 of 396
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
April 10, 2007
6:00 PM
C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CHASE\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\OLK60\04-10-2007 MINUTES.DOC
Present: Council President Olson
Councilmember Ron Wambolt
Councilmember Dave Orvis
Staff: Dan Clements
Kathleen Junglov
Deb Sharp
Committee Chair Orvis called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
Item A: 2007 First Quarter Budget Amendment
Debra Sharp and Kathleen Junglov reviewed the list of amendments with committee
members. After a brief discussion, committee members recommended forwarding the
ordinance to full council for approval as a consent item.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 PM.
Packet Page 394 of 396
Minutes
Public Safety Committee Meeting
April 10, 2007
Committee Members Present: Council member Deanna Dawson, Chair
Council member Michael Plunkett
Staff Present: Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg
Police Chief David Stern
Assistant Chief Mark Correira
Guests: Mark Bailey
The meeting was called to order at 1800 hours.
A. Request for Qualifications – Fire Department Medical Program Director (MPD)
Dr. James Mercer, a member of the Edmonds Emergency Physician's Group, and long time
Medical Program Director (ALS and BLS) for the Edmonds and Lynnwood Fire Departments,
has decided to step back from the MPD position he has held since 1998. Dr. Mercer began
service under Medic 7, served both departments for three years after the January 1, 2003 Medic
7 dissolution, and subsequently signed individual contracts with the two fire departments to
continue as MPD.
After consulting with the City Attorney on a replacement process, Fire Administration seeks to
publish a "Request for Qualifications - Medical Program Director" document to begin the hiring
process. Dr. Mercer has agreed to serve until his successor assumes MPD duties.
AC Correira reviewed the attached RFQ with Public Safety Committee members. Edmonds is
working in concert with Lynnwood Fire in the hiring process although the MPD contracts are
separate. The candidate selection process includes submission of qualifications, background
check, and an interview panel. Committee members indicated their willingness to serve on the
interview panel. Part of the hiring process requires approval of the appointee by Snohomish
County MPD Dr. Ron Brown. The City Attorney will review the MPD employment contract.
When a successor is chosen, the MPD employment contract will be reviewed by the Public
Safety Committee prior to Council submission on the consent agenda. Committee members
indicated they could be contacted for contract approval prior to a scheduled Public Safety
Committee meeting.
Action: After approval by the City Attorney, the Medical Program Director position RFQ will be
published.
B. Update on Graffiti Enforcement (Unscheduled)
Council Chair Dawson gave an update on a discussion from previous meetings on the graffiti
enforcement. Chair Dawson noted that she had contacted other departments and found that
their legislative approach was measured as opposed to very aggressive. Chief Stern indicated
that such an approach would be his recommendation to the Council as well.
A target date of May 1, 2007 was agreed upon for presentation to the full Council.
Packet Page 395 of 396
Action: On April 10, 2007 the Public Safety Committee met. Chair Dawson gave an update on
her findings of other department approaches regarding graffiti enforcement. A target date of
May 1, 2007 was agreed for presentation to the full Council.
Meeting adjourned at 1817 hours.
Packet Page 396 of 396