HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007.05.22 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
May 22, 2007
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1.Approval of Agenda
2.Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B.AM-1000
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of May 15, 2007.
C.AM-1003
Approval of claim checks #96295 through #96459 for May 17, 2007 in the amount of $379,290.90. Approval
of payroll direct deposits and checks #44830 through #44895 for the period of May 1 through May 15, 2007 in
the amount of $790,967.90.
D.AM-990
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Natalia Sedykh (amount undetermined).
E.AM-995
Report of bids opened on May 8, 2007 for the 2007 Street Overlay Program and award of contract to Wilder
Construction Company ($859,815.30).
F.AM-993
Report of bids opened on May 10, 2007 for the Old Woodway Elementary School Demolition project and award
of contract to R.W. Rhine, Inc.($344,605.34).
G.AM-996
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract with the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce for the 4th of
July parade and fireworks display.
H.AM-997
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract with the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce for the Taste
of Edmonds.
I.AM-998
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract with the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce for Hot
Autumn Nites.
J.AM-999
Proposed Resolution setting a hearing date regarding the proposed vacation of city right-of-way adjacent to
17008 – 77th Place W. Applicant: Donald Willis; File No. ENG-07-124.
K.AM-991
Proposed Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the Edmonds Community Development
Code, Chapter 18.45 Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code, to incorporate the terms "Improved" and "Partially
Improved" in order to comply with recent decisions of the Washington Supreme Court, and fixing a time when
the same shall become effective.
L.AM-976
Proclamation in honor of Public Works Week, May 20 - 26, 2007.
3.AM-1002
(20 Min)
Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce presentation on "Everything Edmonds."
4.AM-994
(45 Min)
Report and recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission on downtown design standards.
5.
Packet Page 1 of 203
5.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)
6.(15 Min)Council reports on outside committee/board meetings.
7.(5 Min)Mayor's Comments
8.(15 Min)Council Comments
9.Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 203
AM-1000 2.B.
Approval of May 15, 2007 Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of May 15, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Draft Minutes 05-15-07
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 11:22 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/17/2007 02:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:57 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/17/2007 09:07
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 3 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
May 15, 2007
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Olson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Mayor Pro Tem
Ron Wambolt, Council President Pro Tem
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember*
(*Via phone for Agenda Items 5 & 6 only)
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
ALSO PRESENT
Shaun Callahan, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director
Debbie Dawson, Animal Control/Ord. Enforcement
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
(Councilmember Orvis was not present for the vote.)
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt requested Item B be removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
(Councilmember Orvis was not present for the vote.) The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #96131 THROUGH #96294 FOR MAY 10, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $354,458.82.
D. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE 2007 EDMONDS ARTS
FESTIVAL.
E. BROADBAND BUSINESS PLAN CONSULTANT SELECTION.
F. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST IN EDMONDS, MAY 18
AND 19, 2007.
Packet Page 4 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 2
ITEM B: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 8, 2007.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt requested the following amendments be made to the minutes:
• Page 3, second to the last paragraph, last sentence: the number 45 should be changed to 25.
• Page 4, third to the last paragraph, second sentence: the figure $102,000 should be changed
to $111,247.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR
APPROVAL OF ITEM B AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
(Councilmember Orvis was not present for the vote.)
3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF POLICE WEEK, MAY 13 - 19, 2007.
Councilmember Dawson read a Proclamation declaring May 13 - 19 as National Police Week and urging
citizens to observe Tuesday, May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day. She presented the Proclamation to
Assistant Police Chief Gerry Gannon.
Assistant Chief Gannon thanked Mayor Pro Tem Olson for attending the award ceremony yesterday to
honor citizens and officers who performed exceptionally in helping protect the community during 2006.
He also thanked the community for their support during the past three weeks after the loss of Police Chief
David Stern.
Councilmember Dawson asked for a moment of silence in remembrance of Police Chief David Stern.
4. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE EDMONDS ARTS
FESTIVAL.
Councilmember Moore read a Proclamation commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Edmonds Arts
Festival and presented the Proclamation to Edmonds Arts Festival Board Member Darlene McClellan.
She recognized Ann McDonald who had volunteered for the Edmonds Arts Festival since 1959, the
second year of the Festival.
Ms. McClellan thanked Edmonds, one of the Festival’s primary partners, for their support. She invited
the public to enjoy the museum as well as the 3-day Arts Festival on Father’s Day weekend.
5. PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE NO. 3639, ESTABLISHING A PERIOD IN WHICH TO
PREPARE AN APPLICATION AND FORMS OF DECISION. THE ORDINANCE
ESTABLISHES A THIRTY-DAY STAY ON PROCESSING OF ANY APPLICATIONS TO THE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD UTILIZING THE NEW DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS.
(Councilmember Orvis joined the Council meeting via telephone.)
Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained following the Council’s approval of Ordinance
No. 3636 which established a new design review hearing process, staff discovered handouts and forms
were necessary to implement that process. Council passed Ordinance No. 3639, an interim ordinance,
imposing a 30-day stay to allow staff and the City Attorney to develop the forms. State law requires a
public hearing be held within 60 days; the ordinance expires on May 16, 2007.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, expressed support for the ordinance which allowed staff additional time.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Olson closed the public hearing.
Packet Page 5 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 3
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised if the Council wished to allow the interim ordinance to expire, no
further action was necessary.
6. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO EDMONDS CITY CODE CHAPTER
5.05 RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL. AMENDMENTS INCLUDE DELETING CATS FROM
THE EXEMPTION OF ROAMING AT LARGE AS WELL AS REQUIRING LICENSING OF
CATS.
Assistant Police Chief Gerry Gannon relayed staff’s request to pull Exhibit 5, the cat licensing ordinance,
to allow Animal Control/Ordinance Enforcement Officer Debbie Dawson an opportunity to do a
comprehensive update of the fee schedule for both dogs and cats and to include a requirement for
microchipping for dogs and cats in the ordinance. Staff was satisfied with the running at large ordinance
in Exhibit 4. He clarified staff supported licensing cats but needed additional time to address the items he
identified.
Councilmember Moore asked whether the Council should adopt the running at large ordinance tonight
and delay the licensing ordinance or adopt both at the same time. City Attorney Scott Snyder answered
unless a penalty were established, the requirement to license cats could not be enforced. Officer Dawson
responded if the running at large ordinance were passed tonight, it could be enforced regardless of the
license requirement.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Richard Hibbert, Edmonds, expressed concern that without cats, the rat population in the City would
increase. He objected to penalizing cats and their owners via the proposed ordinance.
Bette Hibbert, Edmonds, agreed cats should be microchipped and did not object to a license requirement
or humane trapping of a bothersome cat. She objected to total control, citing the potential increase in the
rat population. She noted their Maine Coon was trained to stay in their yard and had killed at least 15
large rats in the past eight years. Her primary concern was ensuring the rat problem did not increase,
particularly near the water. She referred to an article regarding a neighborhood in Sacramento where the
elimination of feral cats resulted in a severe rat problem. She was concerned with introducing diseases
carried by rats in exchange for the convenience of controlling cats. She hoped the City’s shelter had a
microchip reader that read all microchips as there were some readers that did not. She pointed out the
difficulty controlling nature, pointing out crows and hawks were also natural predators of small birds.
Maryellen Young, Edmonds, was against the ordinance requiring cats be contained. She pointed out the
difficulty of training a cat to stay indoors once a cat had been allowed outside and suggested
grandfathering all existing cats. She referred to Officer Dawson’s indication that 40% of animal control
calls were for cats, questioning how many were in regard to neighborhood cats. If neighborhood cats
were kept indoors, there would still be calls to animal control for strays, abandoned litters and feral cats.
She noted the potential for neighborhood disputes as a result of the ordinance and the increase in animal
controls calls that would occur. She shared concern about the potential increase in the rodent population.
She referred to Officer Dawson’s indication that only 10% of captured cats were returned, questioning
what happened to the cats that were not returned and citing the additional cost to the City to house and
euthanize more cats. She was not opposed to requiring cats be licensed or microchipped. She questioned
the statement that Edmonds was in the minority of cities that did not require cats be contained. She asked
when this was identified as a critical city need and what research was conducted prior to proposing this
change. She objected to a dispute between neighbors resulting in City policy.
Packet Page 6 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 4
Cheri Zehner, Edmonds, explained her background was in environmental health and her yard was a
certified backyard sanctuary. As a former health inspector, one of her responsibilities was responding to
rodent complaints; none of the environmental-friendly remedies was a cat. She pointed out cats catch
diseases from capturing rodents and birds. She enumerated diseases transmitted by cats to humans
including rabies and toxoplasmosis and encouraged the Council to remove the exemption for cats from
the at large ordinance. She referred to her letter which contained further detail.
Bob Chaffee, Edmonds, cited information from the Humane Society of the United States Guide to Cat
Law and Coalition that stated although cats enjoyed being outdoors where they could explore, it was a
myth that going outdoors was a prerequisite for cat happiness. A Puget Sound Cats Indoors Coalition
brochure, “An Indoor Cat is a Happy Cat,” stated indoor cats lived 10-15 years longer than indoor-
outdoor free roaming cats, were healthier and had a safer and more comfortable environment. The
brochure cited dangers that free roaming cats encountered including dogs, poisons, predators, illnesses
and deliberate inhumane treatment. He cited the Humane Society which indicated cats were the number
one domestic vector for rabies and spreading toxoplasmosis. He commented on the ability for cat owners
to create feline-friendly indoor spaces, concluding the proposed ordinance did not require cats to remain
indoors but allowed them to be outdoors in an enclosure or on a leash. He urged Council to revise the
City’s running at large ordinance by eliminating the exemption for cats. He also recommended cats be
required to be licensed.
Linda Villesvik, Edmonds, asked how many complaints the City received about cats. She asked what
constituted “roaming at large” and whether the same criteria that applied to dogs would apply to cats. She
commented they lived on a cul-de-sac with numerous cats; she had not seen a rodent in the five years they
lived there. If the ordinance were enacted, she asked the priority of enforcing it.
Jan Robertson, Edmonds, agreed with the need for cats to control rodents, noting in 40 years she had
only seen one feral cat. She commented on issues that arise in a neighborhood including unmowed lawns,
loud music, barking dogs, etc., and urged residents be more tolerant neighbors. If a cat was bothering
someone, spray the cat with the hose. She supported requiring a cat license, noting her cat was
microchipped.
Lori Kunze, Edmonds, whose two cats stayed indoors, explained they recently moved to Edmonds from
Michigan where allowing cats to roam free was considered cruel due to the dangers they faced from cars,
heat and cold. She recommended cat owners keep their cats confined to their yards or if they roamed
free, be microchipped so that animal control could return them. Because neighborhood cats used their
yard as a litter box and the puppy they are raising as a service dog consumes the feces and contracts
intestinal parasites, they can no longer allow the puppy loose in the backyard. She supported requiring a
cat license and urged owners whose cats roamed free to ensure they were free of disease and parasites.
Clare Bland, Shoreline, representing PAWS, encouraged Council to support the proposed amendments,
finding it a progressive and important step. Removing the exemption for cats from the at-large ordinance
would hold cat owners to the same expectations and responsibilities as other pet owners – protecting them
and preventing them from becoming a hazard or nuisance. Keeping cats confined would ultimately
reduce feral cat populations as most feral cats were descendants of unaltered pet cats allowed to roam that
become lost. Licensing would assist in returning lost cats and lowering euthanasia of cats as well as
reduce costs by allowing staff to return cats to their homes rather than a shelter. Requiring cats to be
confined would lower their exposure to hazards such as cars, poisons, wild predators and cruel people.
She noted 13% of animals received at the PAWS Wildlife Center had been attacked by free roaming cats.
She acknowledged residents would be required to make adjustments to keep their cats confined and
encouraged the City to consider an educational component, offering PAWS as a resource.
Packet Page 7 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 5
Bonnie Olson, Edmonds, commented when she was looking for a rental home in surrounding cities, she
found most required cats to be indoors or required cats to be leashed. She was concerned for her cats’
quality of life, envisioning it would be difficult to walk them enough on a leash. She concluded if
Edmonds eliminated the exemption for cats, she would be forced to move.
Carol Hahn, Edmonds, agreed with the suggestion to grandfather existing free roaming cats. She
commented on their intent to have the cat that they obtained from the animal shelter be an indoor cat but
the cat’s insistence on being outdoors. She was happy to have her cat microchipped and obtain a license,
and urged the City not to set the license fee too high. She noted for the cats that had been allowed to
roam free, it was an imposition to require they be confined.
Bob Clos, Edmonds, supported regulating both cats and dogs and the City’s action on neutering and
trapping feral cats. He referred to his granddaughter’s Maltese who was smaller than the cats in their
neighborhood but was required to be leashed and have her waste cleaned up. By contrast, the
approximately six cats in their neighborhood used their garden as a litter box, kill birds, etc. He noted
regulating dogs seemed to work, similar regulations for cats could work equally as well. He anticipated
the program could be funded via license fees and fines.
Rose Marie Nichols, Edmonds, advised their cat was primarily a house cat but did not have an indoor
litter box. She agreed with licensing and microchipping cats. She commented on the difficulty leashing
an adult cat who was not used to a leash. She explained her cats did not roam far and used only their yard
for a litter box. She agreed with the suggestion to grandfather existing free roaming cats.
Debbie McCallum, Edmonds, disagreed with the comment that a confined cat would suffer emotional
trauma due to lack of contentment. She questioned why the cat’s feelings took precedence over neighbors
who did not welcome cats on their property. She assured there were other methods of confining cats in
addition to a leash such as electronic fencing and cat enclosures. She objected to being labeled a cat hater
because they did not want the neighbors’ cats on their property, expressing a desire to keep their property
free of cat waste and dead birds. She concluded many local jurisdictions had cat leash laws including
Lynnwood, Mukilteo, Lake Forest Park and Woodway.
Doris Eaker, Edmonds, identified herself as a cat lover and advised their cats stayed in their backyard by
choice but were free to roam. She did not support a cat leash law.
Mike Monroe, Edmonds, commented on the difference between the impacts of cats and dogs, finding it
ridiculous to require a leash for a cat or require an outdoor cat be confined to the owner’s property. He
observed the Council packet indicated a majority of cat owners were not in favor of this ordinance. With
regard to the statement that Edmonds was in the minority by not having a cat leash law, his research via
Municipal Research and Services Center of ten cities found only Woodway had a leash law. Cities
without a cat leash law included Everett, Seattle, Marysville, Monroe, Snohomish, Shoreline, Bellevue,
Mill Creek and Mountlake Terrace which he noted constituted a population of approximately one million
which was hardly a minority. He concluded if Edmonds adopted a cat leash law, it would be in the
minority. He urged Council not to adopt the cat leash law but was amenable to requiring a cat license.
Doug Rainwater, Edmonds, found it premature to enact a leash law for cats if the leash law for dogs was
not being enforced. He pointed out unleashed dogs often chased eagles, herons, seals, ducks, geese, etc.
on the beach. He agreed with requiring licensing and microchipping. He agreed there was a rat problem
in the Edmonds area, advising his cat caught a rat today.
Doug MacWilliams, Edmonds, commented on an indoor-outdoor cat he owned for 20-years that did not
bother anyone in the neighborhood. He suggested if the goal was to control nuisances, licenses, leashes,
Packet Page 8 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 6
and microchips should be required for children as they created more ruckus in his neighborhood than cats.
He pointed out dead birds could also be due to raccoons, coyotes, hawks and owls. He described his
experience with a cat that escaped from its harness and leash during a move, summarizing he did not
support requiring cats to be leashed or confining them to the yard.
Joan Bloom, Edmonds, spoke in favor of licensing cats but questioned the sanity of enacting regulations
that prevented cats from roaming free. In talking to her neighbor about the ordinance, the neighbor
reported her cat had killed no less than six large rats. If cats were contained indoors, rats would be free to
roam and make their homes in crawl spaces, sheds, garages, attics, etc. She summarized her two cats and
neighborhood cats often killed mice but she had only found two dead birds. She pointed out the key to
preserving birds was providing habitat.
Susie Schaefer, Edmonds, Vice President, Philchuck Audubon Society, provided a copy of the National
Audubon Society resolution urging jurisdictions to adopt laws that protected wildlife and identifying the
effect of cats as predators. Commenting that she usually spoke about habitat preservation, cats also posed
a danger for birds as they did not distinguish between desirable and undesirable birds. She encouraged
the Council to take action to preserve birds and wildlife in Edmonds. In response to Ms. Schaefer’s
question, Mayor Pro Tem Olson advised the proclamation in honor of the May 18-19 Bird Fest was
approved on the Consent Agenda.
Olaf VanLuenen, Edmonds, favored cat owners who were responsible for their pets similar to dog
owners. He referred to three cats in his neighborhood that used his yard as a litter box, a violation of his
property rights. He supported regulations that required cat owners to keep their pets confined to their
yard.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented on problems with geese and beaver on Lake Ballinger, recalling in
the past the State trapped the beaver. He noted cats that lived in apartments were primarily indoor cats.
Georgia Welch, Invisible Fence Northwest, advised in the greater Seattle area they had approximately
2500 cats safely contained on property via invisible fences, an option to containing cats via a leash. She
offered to provide written information.
Ilene York, Edmonds, reported her leashed cat was attacked by a dog in an apartment complex. She
commented if cat owners were more responsible such as maintaining a clean littler box in their home, cats
would not use the neighbor’s yard as a litter box. She resented that a neighborhood dispute required the
Council to adopt such an ordinance when the dog leash law was not being enforced.
Mike Mestress, Edmonds, recommended if a resident had an issue with a neighbor’s cat, rather than the
cat being taken into custody, animal control could fine the owner.
Mark McDonald, representing his father Norman McDonald, Edmonds, referred to a letter his father
wrote to the Council regarding this issue. He observed the following from tonight’s comments: Officer
Dawson supported the equal treatment of cats and licensing of dogs and cats and believed implementation
of the proposed ordinance was possible within current budget restraints; the proposed ordinance was not a
leash law but a control ordinance; a former health officer stated roaming cats increased the transmission
of diseases and unsafe health conditions; a free roaming cat population had a negligible impact on rodent
control and better results could be achieved via proper handling of food waste and feeding pets indoors;
there were humane and effective ways to exercise cats while controlling them and keeping them safe;
animal rights groups supported controlling cats, and uncontrolled roaming cats affected the ability of
humans to enjoy their property. He concluded equitable treatment of all pet owners could be achieved by
passing the changes to City Code as proposed. He urged Council to consider the facts and approve an
Packet Page 9 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 7
amendment that removed the exception for cats from the at large ordinance. He also supported
mandatory licensing of cats.
Mike Shaw, Edmonds, urged Council not to waste taxpayers’ money by voting on cat leash laws. He
would not support any Councilmember who voted to waste money on that issue. He pointed out dogs
were pack animals; cats were not. Although he had numerous run-ins with dogs and packs of dogs in his
56 years in the community, he had never been attacked by a cat.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, reported most speakers were in favor of licensing, 16 cat owners did not
favor confining them and 8 favored confinement. He disagreed the proposed ordinance was a leash law,
noting there were electronic methods for containing dogs or cats on a resident’s property. He supported
equal treatment for dogs and cats, noting the waste that cats left behind was offensive to many people. He
found the health issue posed by free roaming cats to be the most compelling reason for requiring cats to
be confined. He acknowledged it may be difficult to confine an older cat that was used to roaming free.
Artel Rainwater, Edmonds, pointed out cats had been around since the pyramids and allowed to roam
free. Society owed a debt to the cat population as cats helped get rid of the plague; cats should be revered
and honored.
Ray Martin, Edmonds, commented he was the unwilling participant in the neighborhood dispute that
raised this issue. He questioned the purpose and goal of the proposed cat restrictions, whether it was to
mollify a muttering mob, punish those opposed to animal cruelty and trapping, payback for his
complaining about a neighbor’s dog who roamed the neighborhood, to protect wild birds, to make life
better for residents with feces-eating dogs, or to reduce the number of pet and feral cats. He commented
the PRD ordinance that eliminated habitat was more detrimental to the bird population than pet cats. He
questioned the percentage of feral versus pet cats in the 40% figure cited by Officer Dawson. He pointed
out the downside of the proposed ordinance was the cost versus the expected benefit. He cited other
reasons for opposing the proposed ordinance including adding another poorly written, punitive,
selectively-enforced ordinance, giving the citizens of Esperance another reason to vote against
annexation, and increasing the population of rodents.
Robert McCallum, Edmonds, commented the way to settle this was to listen to animal control staff. He
advised Officer Dawson’s credentials included serving as a Board Member of the National Animal
Control Association, 20 years of animal control experience, 23 years of experience in animal welfare,
extensive training and she is fair, knowledgeable and patient. He identified the neighborhood cats that are
a nuisance on his property, commenting when he contacted their owners, there was no recourse without a
law. He recommended Council adopt the ordinance based on Officer Dawson’s experience and
knowledge.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Olson closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Dawson advised in addition to correspondence in the Council packet, correspondence
had also been received from the following:
• Henry Grenley – opposed to changing the law, adding a license requirement for cats was
acceptable
• Mike Keplinger – suggested a graduated license that charged more for outdoor cats
• Marcia Fisher – against changing the law
• Anne Meiers – in favor of changing the law as proposed
• Lydia Tanev – in favor of changing the law as proposed
• Councilmember Moore – Seattle Times article
Packet Page 10 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 8
• Delores Marshall – opposed to changing the law as proposed
• James Monroe – in favor of residents keeping cats confined
• Tom & Ann Bunton – vote in favor of the cat (opposed to a restrictive ordinance)
• Dean Anson – in favor of changing the law as proposed
• Barbara Loudent – in favor of changing the law as proposed
• Stewart Scham – in favor of changing the law as proposed and in favor of licensing cats
• Robert Chaffee, MD – article
• Ray Martin – opposed to changing the law as proposed
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the research done by one of the speakers that indicated Edmonds
would be one of only a few cities that would require cats be confined. Officer Dawson advised her
research of the MRSC website found King County has a cat control law and a license requirement which
is referenced as a leash law although it did not require a leash, Everett has a license and leash law,
Mountlake Terrace has a license requirement and adopted a cat exemption five years ago, and Lynnwood
has a license requirement. She summarized most jurisdictions had a license requirement and many had a
control requirement.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether King County included Seattle. Officer Dawson answered no but
Seattle had a leash and license requirement. She believed Snohomish County had a license requirement
but no laws regarding cats. If the ordinance were approved and licensing and microchipping were
required, Councilmember Plunkett asked whether animal control could be called to capture a roaming cat
and based on the license or chip, return the animal to the home. Officer Dawson agreed the goal now and
in the future would be to reunite an identifiable animal with its owner. The City did not currently have a
free ride policy; if a dog was found running at large, it was taken into custody and checked into the
animal facility and the owner contacted. The current method for cats was the same.
Councilmember Plunkett commented a grandfathering clause would only require a date to determine
whether a cat was owned prior to enactment of the ordinance. Mr. Snyder stated because the City did not
currently require cat licenses, a registration period or similar method would be required. Officer Dawson
supported the concept of grandfathering existing cats, pointing out it would be difficult to enforce. She
commented the current kennel facility only had six cat cages; it was not the intent to round up all cats
roaming free but to handle them on a complaint basis. Conversely dogs were pack animals and because a
dog running loose posed a safety issue, they were taken into custody on sight.
Councilmember Orvis commented a cat that remained on their property was not considered “at large” and
the ordinance would be enforced on a complaint basis. Officer Dawson agreed.
Assistant Chief Gannon commented via adoption of the ordinance, the roaming at large provisions would
be the same for both cats and dogs; enforcement for cats would be on a case-by-case, complaint basis.
Councilmember Moore clarified enforcement for cats would be on a case-by-case, complaint basis. If a
neighborhood was satisfied with cats roaming at large, there would be no issue. Officer Dawson agreed.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR
APPROVAL OF THE RUNNING AT LARGE ORDINANCE.
Councilmember Marin advised he was persuaded by the animal advocacy groups’ position that it was
safer and healthier for cats and the public for cats to be somewhat confined. He found it appropriate that
a resident could expect an animal not be allowed to defecate on their property.
Packet Page 11 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 9
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE A
GRANDFATHER CLAUSE. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Student Representative Callahan commented his indoor/outdoor cat lived to be 20 years old and none of
his neighbors objected to the two cats he owned currently. He pointed out cats were not pack animals, did
not pose a threat to humans and were very clever which would make the ordinance difficult to enforce.
He anticipated the rodent population would increase if cats were confined. He agreed cats had less impact
on wildlife compared to the impact of development.
Councilmember Moore was disappointed that some members of the public believed this issue was about
her dislike of cats. She explained her outdoor cats in the past that had been killed by raccoons and she
were banned from adopting from PAWS because they allowed the cats outside. She explained she raised
the issue again due to a preponderance of people who wanted to talk about it. She was disappointed in the
members of the public who did not believe this was an important issue and who thought it was a waste of
time. She summarized it was an important issue as evidenced by the number of people in attendance.
With regard to rodents, she had never had a mouse or rat in any of her houses in Edmonds. She
commented anyone with rodents should limit their food supply, trap them, poison them and/or rodent-
proof their house as evidence indicated cats did not reduce the rodent population. She concluded none of
the advocacy groups favored free roaming cats, they all favored controlling cats for the cats’ and society’s
safety. She indicated her support for the proposed ordinance.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt acknowledged this issue arose as a result of a dispute between two
neighbors but it became clear there was a problem with cats roaming at large as indicated by the
correspondence the Council received. He referred to Mr. McDonald’s summary of why the ordinance
was necessary and the reasons cited by Councilmember Moore as the reasons he would support the
ordinance.
Councilmember Plunkett found the recommendation that the Council base its decision on health factors a
compelling argument. However, if the ordinance were enacted, he anticipated there were people who
would abandon their cats, people who would not rescue feral cats, and strays would continue to
proliferate. Therefore enacting this ordinance would increase health problems as well as increase the rat
population. He agreed with making a decision based on health and therefore would not support the
motion.
Councilmember Dawson shared the concern that people would surrender or abandon their cats if the
ordinance were enacted and cats were required to be kept inside. Although she was tempted to support
Councilmember Plunkett’s motion to grandfather existing cats, she acknowledged it would be
unenforceable, creating “diplomatic immunity” for certain cats. She was supportive of licensing cats and
creating an enhanced license fee for outdoor cats to encourage people to keep their cats indoors. She
acknowledged it was difficult to keep her cat indoors and difficult if not impossible to keep a cat indoors
that was used to being outdoors. She noted there were “neighborhood cats” that the neighborhood joined
in caring for. She was also concerned with enacting an ordinance that would only be enforced via
complaint. She supported public education regarding the health benefits of keeping cats indoors, noting
cats that are allowed outdoors caught disease, got hit by cars, etc. She was supportive of giving residents
a warning that such an ordinance would be enacted in the future. She did not support the motion.
Councilmember Orvis indicated he would reluctantly support the motion. Although he understood the
difference between cats and dogs, the truth was that being outside was dangerous to cats as evidence by
his cat being hit by a car when he was a teen. He did not see the issue as indoor versus outdoor or leash
versus unleashed but an issue of control.
Packet Page 12 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 10
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt referred to the comment that the Council should not enact
ordinances the City did not intend to enforce other than via complaint. He noted this would not be a
precedent as many of the City’s codes were enforced on a complaint basis. When this issue first arose, he
was opposed to containing cats; once he was educated, he found it the right thing to do.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson asked whether there had been an increase in abandoned cats in other cities where
similar ordinances had been adopted. Officer Dawson answered she would need to contact the cities;
however, her experience in animal shelters did not find cats were surrendered due to changes in laws.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson commented some of the opposition was not fact-based but based on supposition.
She noted residents who liked to garden had no recourse against a neighbor’s cat that used their garden as
a litter box. This issue arose because those property owners had no way to prevent cats from trespassing
on their property. She agreed it was unfortunate more laws were required, pointing out laws that have
been enacted with regard to seatbelts, helmets, etc. She supported the ordinance.
UPON ROLL CALL MOTION CARRIED (5-2), MAYOR PRO TEM OLSON, COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PRO TEM WAMBOLT, AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, MARIN AND MOORE
IN FAVOR, AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED. The Ordinance
that was adopted reads as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 3645 - AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5.05.050 RUNNING AT
LARGE PROHIBITED TO DELETE THE EXCEPTIONS FOR CATS, AND REQUIRE THAT
THE CUSTODY OF CAPTURED STRAY ANIMALS BE TURNED OVER TO THE ANIMAL
CONTROL AUTHORITY.
(Councilmember Orvis left the meeting.)
7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Roger Oliver, Edmonds, explained he volunteered for an organization that picked up and distributed
disability equipment, located under the Pancake House behind Petosa’s Grocery. In an effort to make
their location more visible, he asked whether a flashing green light could be placed at the end of the
private alley and was told it was not allowed by the building department as the sign ordinance did not
allow light intensity changes less than 20 seconds in duration. If that were true, he questioned how the
Westgate Chapel, Edmonds-Woodway High School, Westgate Carwash signs were allowed. He objected
to what appeared to be a double standard.
Jan Vance, Executive Director, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, advised the Chamber planned
to provide a monthly report to the Council to keep the Council and the public informed of the Chamber’s
activities. The mission of the Chamber’s Economic Development Committee was to foster a vibrant
economic environment for Edmonds in the area of industry, service and retail business and keep abreast
of legislative issues that may affect the business community. The function of the committee is to keep the
Chamber informed of governmental affairs, transportation and economic development matters, propose
statements that were relevant to the mission to the Chamber board, foster a vibrant economic environment
for the Edmonds area, and hold a candidate forum to keep the community informed on issues. The
Chamber’s policy has been not to endorse or support candidates; the Chamber does endorse issues
pertinent to their mission.
Dale Hoggins, Edmonds, on behalf of the Edmonds Cemetery Board, invited the Council and the public
to the 25th Annual Memorial Day Ceremony on Monday, May 28 at the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
and Columbarium. The ceremony will remember and honor the memories of all military personnel who
have died serving the country during times of war and honor all veterans and gold star families. He noted
the Edmonds Cemetery was the final resting place for over 400 veterans including 40 who served in either
Packet Page 13 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 11
the Spanish American War or the Civil War. This year’s ceremony would salute the Coast Guard and
would include several SPARs from World War II and local youth.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, referred to his comments at the last Council meeting regarding the City hiring a
City Manager, noting Kirkland had a City Manager. He compared Edmonds to Kirkland, pointing out
Kirkland had a parking garage and a thriving downtown. He noted Edmonds should have converted the
civic fields to a ballfield, parking garage and businesses like Kirkland did. Kirkland also worked with the
School District to upgrade school fields and developed a former garbage facility into ballfields. He
summarized the City needed more ballfields particularly as GMA increased density. Next he urged the
Council to consider adopting term limits for the Mayor.
Lora Petso, Edmonds, referred to her comments at a previous Council meeting in an attempt to save
trees on the former Woodway Elementary School property. She reported rather than demolishing the 15
trees in the building area, the current plan was to demolish only 8. She noted the next dilemma was
which eight to remove when there was not a park plan in place. She displayed photographs of the trees on
the site to demonstrate their size, some as tall as 80 feet. On her site visit, she was unable to identify eight
trees that she would recommend be removed and asked the Council to consider saving more trees. She
displayed a photograph of asbestos board on the site, commenting although it was harmless when part of
the covered walkways on the site, it was capable of putting asbestos fibers into the air when broken,
destroyed or damaged which was likely when it remained on the site. Although she contacted staff and
was told they would inform the appropriate parties, she noticed today that the asbestos board had not yet
been removed.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, remarked on the number of pedestrians in the City, pointing out numerous
crosswalks needed to be repainted. He suggested utilizing the excess REET funds to repaint the
crosswalks. Next, he referred to the new skate board park and although the City was not liable for any
injuries, the City had a moral liability and should require users wear helmets.
Susie Schaefer, Edmonds, Vice President, Philchuck Audubon Society, reminded the public of the Bird
Fest this weekend, beginning on Friday evening with an art show at the Edmonds Conference Center.
She thanked everyone involved with the Bird Fest. She commented on activities that were planned during
the Bird Fest. She read the Proclamation (approved on the consent Agenda) in honor of Puget Sound Bird
Fest in Edmonds on May 18-19.
Robert McCallum, Edmonds, thanked the Council for adopting the ordinance related to not exempting
cats from roaming at large, envisioning eventually everyone would be happy with the decision.
8. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Finance Committee
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt reported due to the experience on the 220th project when a staff
member was hired by the consultant, the Committee requested a policy be drafted that would prohibit
staff who have recently separated from City employment being retained as consultants on City projects
with a provision that allowed the former staff member to be retained if it was deemed to be in the City’s
best interest. Next, the Committee was provided a comparison of the costs for a contract versus city-
employed City Attorney and determined the City currently was in the middle of the range. The
Committee requested that staff update the comparison figures to include 2006 information when it was
available. The Committee then reviewed the first quarter financial report that revealed REET revenue
growth has slowed, construction related sales tax declined since last year and public safety overtime
appeared to be above budget estimates. The last item reviewed by the Committee was a proposal to hire a
Packet Page 14 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 12
consultant to prepare a business case analysis of the City’s community broadband initiative which was
approved on tonight’s Consent Agenda.
With regard to the policy to prohibit staff who have recently separated from City employment from being
retained as consultants on City projects, Councilmember Marin recommended the provision that allowed
them to be retained be developed so that that could occur easily when appropriate. Councilmember
Plunkett disagreed the provision should allow it to occur easily, commenting the intent was to prevent it
from occurring and suggested it occur only with a vote of the City Council.
Joint Public Safety & Community Services/Development Services Committee
Councilmember Dawson advised staff provided an update on the 2006 International Building, Fire and
Supplemental Code Adoption, the changes to State Code and the subsequent changes that would be
necessary to the City’s code. There were no substantive changes; one of the changes was removal of
rockery regulations. Staff also provided an update regarding adoption of the International Fire Codes.
There were no substantive changes; one change was to the regulations governing nightclubs. Staff agreed
to follow up on changes being made with regard to LDMRs.
Public Safety
Councilmember Dawson reported staff provided an update on parking infraction penalties, noting the
City’s parking study that was done a few years ago recommended raising parking fines and the
Downtown Parking Committee also supported the proposed new fines. The Committee recommended
approval and directed staff to prepare an ordinance for Council approval on the consent agenda.
9. MAYOR PRO TEM COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Olson thanked staff and the Council for their support tonight particularly since her vision
was impaired.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
With regard to Councilmember Dawson’s report that the ordinance increasing parking fines would be
scheduled on the Consent Agenda, Councilmember Plunkett suggested instead the Council schedule a
public hearing. Councilmember Dawson agreed. City Clerk Sandy Chase suggested scheduling the
public hearing on June 19.
In response to Ms. Petso’s comments about the tree removal on the old Woodway Elementary School site,
Councilmember Moore asked Mayor Pro Tem Olson to monitor what trees were removed. She noted
trees of that size could not be easily replaced and trees affected climate change.
Councilmember Moore asked for an update regarding the Economic Development Director position.
Mayor Pro Tem Olson relayed that the candidate Mayor Haakenson wanted to hire was unable to accept
the position so he planned to re-advertise the position.
With regard to requiring helmets at the skate park, Councilmember Moore suggested this could be
discussed by the Public Safety Committee and/or a sign installed that recommended helmets.
Councilmember Moore invited the public to Edmonds Community College’s performance of Cabaret at
the Edmonds Center for the Arts on May 18-20. She encouraged the public to attend the Jazz Connection
presented by the Daybreakers Rotary on Memorial Day Weekend at the Edmonds Center for the Arts.
Packet Page 15 of 203
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 15, 2007
Page 13
Councilmember Dawson reported on the Marysville-Tulalip Chamber of Commerce’s Military Family
Friendly Employer Program that encouraged businesses and governmental agencies to employ spouses
and dependants of military members due to the difficulty they encounter finding employment for fear they
would move when the military person was deployed. She noted most employees only stayed with a job 2-
4 years, the average length of a deployment. Many of these dependants have excellent skills and could be
great employees. Cities and chambers were asked, when someone applied for a business license, to have
the business owner sign a non-binding agreement that they were supportive of hiring military family
members. If they signed the agreement, the business would receive a window placard stating they were a
military family employer. She suggested when businesses became Chamber members they also be
encouraged to support this program. City and county officials and Chambers of Commerce are invited to
the Marysville-Tulalip June 21 event. She noted this program recently received an award from AWB.
Councilmember Marin reported he participates on the Puget Sound Regional Council Regional Policy
Board as does Don Gerend, the father of the City’s former Economic Development Director Jennifer
Gerend. Mr. Gerend advised his daughter was doing well and had reached the end of her fellowship. She
has accepted a position as an urban planner with the City of Trier in southern Germany.
In response to Mayor Haakenson’s request for statistics regarding Sounder ridership, Councilmember
Marin reported Sounder carried 53,160 people during the first quarter of 2007 and ridership was up 57%
during that period compared to the first quarter of 2006. Councilmember Moore asked when the other
trains would be added. Mayor Pro Tem Olson advised Fall 2007.
Student Representative Callahan thanked the late Police Chief David Stern and the Edmonds Police
Department for their support of Edmonds youth programs such as the DARE program. He hoped the next
Police Chief would be equally as supportive.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
Packet Page 16 of 203
AM-1003 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #96295 through #96459 for May 17, 2007 in the amount of
$379,290.90. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44830 through #44895 for the period
of May 1 through May 15, 2007 in the amount of $790,967.90.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 2007
Revenue:
Expenditure: $1,170,258.80
Fiscal Impact:
Claims $379,290.90
Payroll $790,967.90
Attachments
Link: Claim Cks 5-17-07
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 05/17/2007 01:21 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:03 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/17/2007 02:53 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:57 PM APRV
Packet Page 17 of 203
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 05/17/2007 12:52
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 18 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96295 5/17/2007 041695 3M XAM3522 SS21450 STREET - BLACK ROLL 30"X50YDS
STREET - BLACK ROLL 30"X50YDS
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 183.75
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 16.36
Total :200.11
96296 5/17/2007 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC E5LD.Ret Release E5LD.Retainage Release
E5LD.Retainage Release
116.000.651.594.190.650.00 1,958.52
Total :1,958.52
96297 5/17/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070430 INV#1201641-20070430 EDMONDS PD
SEARCHES/REPORTS FOR APRIL 07
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 39.50
Total :39.50
96298 5/17/2007 071373 AGRO DISTRIBUTING LLC 2388942 RI SUPPLIES
ROUNDUP, CASORON, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 694.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 61.07
Total :755.07
96299 5/17/2007 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101252106 M5Z34
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 25.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.23
M5Z34101261516
CENTERSHIELD GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 61.84
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.50
Total :94.57
1Page:
Packet Page 19 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96300 5/17/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8250 APRIL 07 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES
APRIL 07 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES
411.000.654.534.800.340.00 92,579.93
Total :92,579.93
96301 5/17/2007 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-000833295 FIRE STATION #20
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 84.34
PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY0197000833391
Public Works Facility
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.76
Public Works Facility
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 78.88
Public Works Facility
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 78.88
Public Works Facility
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 78.88
Public Works Facility
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 78.88
Public Works Facility
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 78.87
0197-000833463197-0801132
GARBAGE & RECYCLE for F/S #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 94.02
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 7.49
0197-0008341783-0197-0829729
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 5.11
garbage for MCC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 47.50
Total :653.61
96302 5/17/2007 060228 ANS OF WASHINGTON INC LINDA ROSS NOTARY STAMP PACKAGE AND JOURNAL FOR
NOTARY STAMP PACKAGE AND JOURNAL FOR
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 114.74
2Page:
Packet Page 20 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :114.74963025/17/2007 060228 060228 ANS OF WASHINGTON INC
96303 5/17/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3875127 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.00
Total :36.76
96304 5/17/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3870448 18386001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.06
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.57
18386001512-3875129
UNIDORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.06
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.57
Total :185.26
96305 5/17/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3870447 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
3Page:
Packet Page 21 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96305 5/17/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS512-3873762
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26
WATER UNIFORM SVC
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47
FAC MAINT - UNIFORM SVC512-3875128
FAC MAINT - UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
4Page:
Packet Page 22 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :112.15963055/17/2007 069751 069751 ARAMARK
96306 5/17/2007 071653 ARNOLD, MEREDITH ARNOLD8398 POLYMER CLAY
POLYMER CLAY BEADS & EMBELLISHMENTS
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 169.00
Total :169.00
96307 5/17/2007 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM
PARKS FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 45.10
Total :45.10
96308 5/17/2007 064343 AT&T 425-774-0944 STATION #20 FAX
STATION #20 FAX
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 29.26
Total :29.26
96309 5/17/2007 065950 ATS ELECTRO-LUBE INTL INC 47652 1870`
TITANIUM BATTERYPACK
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 384.54
Total :384.54
96310 5/17/2007 071439 AUTOMATIC ENTRIES INC 16870 PW- INSTALLED AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER FOR
PW- INSTALLED AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENER FOR
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 2,330.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 207.37
Total :2,537.37
96311 5/17/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 40354 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
5Page:
Packet Page 23 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96311 5/17/2007 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #200 PRINTING
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 88.60
UB Outsourcing area #200 PRINTING
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 88.60
UB Outsourcing area #200 PRINTING
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 88.87
UB Outsourcing area #200 POSTAGE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 248.90
UB Outsourcing area #200 POSTAGE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 248.89
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 7.89
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 7.89
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 7.90
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS40414
UB Outsourcing area #700 PRINTING
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 23.04
UB Outsourcing area #700 PRINTING
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 23.04
UB Outsourcing area #700 PRINTING
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 23.12
UB Outsourcing area #700 POSTAGE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 85.41
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.05
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.05
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.06
UB Outsourcing area #700 POSTAGE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 85.41
Total :1,033.72
6Page:
Packet Page 24 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96312 5/17/2007 071581 AVIDEX INDUSTRIES LLC I025849 INV#I025849 CUST#EDM003 EDMONDS PD
Freight
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 8.30
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 335.80
PANASONIC 16 CHANNEL DVR
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 3,764.75
Total :4,108.85
96313 5/17/2007 064706 AWC 0283 TRAINING/LEIN
TRAINING/LEIN
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 85.00
TRAINING/HALL2320
TRAINING/HALL
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 85.00
Total :170.00
96314 5/17/2007 070634 BAUGHER, JANEE BAUGHER0227 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST JUDGE
JUDGE OF THE POETRY CATEGORY OF THE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00
Total :100.00
96315 5/17/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 574009 INV#574009 EDMONDS PD - FALK
MOTORCYCLE BOOTS - FALK
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 349.95
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 31.15
INV#576653-01 EDMONDS PD - COLLINS576653-01
BASEBALL CAP W/EMBROIDERY
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 19.95
NAMEPLATE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.00
ACADEMY PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 59.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.91
7Page:
Packet Page 25 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96315 5/17/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#577040 EDMONDS PD - COMMENDATION BAR577040
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 23.50
COMMENDATION BARS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 264.00
INV#578555-01 EDMONDS PD - COMPTON578555-01
SHORT SLEEVE SHIRT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 59.95
LONG SLEEVE SHIRT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 159.90
ACADEMY SWEATS & TSHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 124.86
EMBROIDERED BASEBALL CAP
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 19.95
NAMEPLATES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 18.00
EP LETTERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95
ACADEMY BDU SHIRTS/PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 163.34
TIE BAR
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 51.43
INV#580084 EDMONDS PD - JEFF JONES580084
SHORT SLEEVE SHIRTS W/SGT CHEV
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 187.35
2 PAIRS UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 213.90
METAL BUTTONS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 14.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 36.96
8Page:
Packet Page 26 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96315 5/17/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#583466 EDMONDS PD - FALK583466
DUTY BELT - FALK
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 45.95
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 4.04
INV#585527 EDMONDS PD - GLOVES585527
WHITE DRESS GLOVES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 95.20
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.47
INV#586030 - EDMONDS PD - CHAPLAIN586030
NAVY DRESS JACKET
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 235.00
FELT BARS/STARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 10.00
TIE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.95
SHOES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 50.00
LAPD STYLE HAT WITH CAP STRAP
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 50.45
WHITE SHIRT WITH SLEEVE STRIPE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 62.95
TIE BAR
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95
NAVY TROUSERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.95
CHAPLAIN CROSSES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.95
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.94
9Page:
Packet Page 27 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96315 5/17/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#586048 EDMONDS PD - MARSH586048
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.85
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.52
INV#586063 EDMONDS PD - BLACKBURN586063
FELT STRIPS & STARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 25.00
DC STRIPE AROUND EACH SLEEVE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 25.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.45
INV#586072 EDMONDS PD - MACINTYRE586072
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.95
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.17
INV#586168 EDMONDS PD - MACHADO586168
SERVICE BARS & STARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.34
INV#586169 EDMONDS PD - KINNEY586169
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.25
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.29
10Page:
Packet Page 28 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96315 5/17/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#586481 EDMONDS PD - HASHMARKS586481
SERVICE BARS - RICHARDSON
001.000.410.521.210.240.00 3.25
SERVICE BARS - CAMERON
001.000.410.521.210.240.00 3.90
BRASS BELT KEEPERS - CAMERON
001.000.410.521.210.240.00 11.80
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.240.00 1.69
INV#5876649 EDMONDS PD - MILLER586649
BLACK DUTY BELT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.95
BLACK BELT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.85
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 6.03
INV#586670 EDMONDS PD - STERN BADGES586670
CHIEF BADGES FOR FAMILY
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 300.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 26.70
Total :3,066.64
96316 5/17/2007 071649 BROOME, KRISTINE 127978 INV#127978 SPAY/NEUTER REFUND
SPAY/NEUTER REFUND
001.000.000.343.930.000.00 50.00
Total :50.00
96317 5/17/2007 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 277472 STREET - CRUSHED ROCK
STREET - CRUSHED ROCK
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 2,901.60
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 220.52
11Page:
Packet Page 29 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96317 5/17/2007 (Continued)003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
STREET - CRUSHED ROCK278243
STREET - CRUSHED ROCK
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 1,429.76
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 108.66
Total :4,660.54
96318 5/17/2007 003255 CANINE COLLEGE CANINECOLLEGE7572 DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES
DOG OBEDIENCE #7572
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 320.00
Total :320.00
96319 5/17/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN04071010 2954000
ARGON/NITROGEN/OXYGEN
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 31.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.76
Total :33.76
96320 5/17/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY106710 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 9.61
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.05
ALS SUPPLIESLY106711
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 28.84
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.76
12Page:
Packet Page 30 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96320 5/17/2007 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
ALS SUPPLIESLY106712
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 19.23
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.91
Total :106.90
96321 5/17/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN04071006 FLEET - CYLINDER RENTAL
FLEET - CYLINDER RENTAL
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 7.75
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 0.69
WATER - CYLINDER RENTALRN04071011
WATER - CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.654.534.800.450.00 31.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.450.00 2.76
Total :42.20
96322 5/17/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT8099 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #8099
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 60.20
Total :60.20
96323 5/17/2007 003710 CHEVRON USA 7898305185705 INV#7898305185705 ACCT#789-830-518-5
FUEL
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 173.99
Total :173.99
96324 5/17/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 87196442X05052007 871964442
PLANT CELL PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 18.92
Total :18.92
13Page:
Packet Page 31 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96325 5/17/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-660-2168 C/A 129795740
Cell phone Gene
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 40.40
Total :40.40
96326 5/17/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 206-369-4557 CELL PHONE FLEET
cell phone fleet
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 8.33
Total :8.33
96327 5/17/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460624241 UNIFORMS
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPERATIONS UNIFORMS460624242
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51
UNIFORMS460625256
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.75
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.74
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.62
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.61
OPS UNIFORMS460625279
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 125.72
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.18
Total :514.43
14Page:
Packet Page 32 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96328 5/17/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5305 INV#5305 CUST#47 EDMONDS PD
PRISONER ROOM/BOARD APRIL 2007
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,011.67
Total :5,011.67
96329 5/17/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5291 MAINT./OPERATIONS SEWER - MAY 07
MAINT./OPERATIONS SEWER - MAY 07
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83
Total :13,800.83
96330 5/17/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR APRIL 07
WATER USEAGE FOR APRIL 07
411.000.654.534.800.340.00 435.00
Total :435.00
96331 5/17/2007 067186 CLEAR IMAGE INC 37309 INV#37309 EDMONDS PD - ASSORTED CASES
FILM PRINTS
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 32.89
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 7.50
8.5% Snohomish County
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 3.44
INV#37330 EDMONDS PD - 06-4685/07-187337330
FILM PRINTS
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 5.98
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 7.50
8.5% Snohomish County
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 1.15
Total :58.46
96332 5/17/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1784296 005302
15Page:
Packet Page 33 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96332 5/17/2007 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES
PAPER TOWELS
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 83.58
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 2.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 7.66
Total :93.74
96333 5/17/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1781607-1 FAC MAINT - BRAWNY
FAC MAINT - BRAWNY
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 88.16
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.85
Total :96.01
96334 5/17/2007 071236 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES 01-049527-0 273384
C-249 VFA ANALYSIS
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 775.00
Total :775.00
96335 5/17/2007 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-8312 UNIT EQ16PM - 2008 FORD 450 - ~
UNIT EQ16PM - 2008 FORD 450 - ~
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 30,212.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 2,416.96
PROMPT PMT INCENTIVE3-8312
Unit EQ16PM 2008 Ford 450 Flatbed
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 -200.00
Total :32,428.96
96336 5/17/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630649063718 FML booklets
FML booklets
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 140.40
Total :140.40
96337 5/17/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630197999875 C/A 4715 6301 9799 9875
16Page:
Packet Page 34 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96337 5/17/2007 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
Sonystyle Direct~Laptop Charger &
001.000.310.514.100.310.00 458.44
ElPuerto~Broadband Interview Luncheon
001.000.310.514.100.310.00 71.53
Thai Cottage~Broadbanl Interview
001.000.310.514.100.310.00 61.72
Total :591.69
96338 5/17/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 588276 CARD CHARGES
Recording Fees
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 238.00
Total :238.00
96339 5/17/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630851494783 DVD's for recording Council Meetings
DVD's for recording Council Meetings
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 35.90
Refreshments for Council Meetings
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 9.87
Total :45.77
96340 5/17/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 630002081232 WHITE
life jacket hangers
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 45.36
CORREIRA630964429858
meeting supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 13.98
headset
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 32.66
Total :92.00
96341 5/17/2007 070468 COUNTRY GREEN TURF FARMS 201285 LAWN MIX
STANDARD LAWN MIX
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 780.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 65.52
17Page:
Packet Page 35 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :845.52963415/17/2007 070468 070468 COUNTRY GREEN TURF FARMS
96342 5/17/2007 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0407 2989771 5374044 INV#0407 2989771 5374044 EDMONDS PD
5 GALLON WATER BOTTLES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 55.92
HOT/COLD DISPENSER RENTAL
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.87
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.89
Total :68.68
96343 5/17/2007 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3191731 E1DB.Invitation to Bid 164th Walkway
E1DB.Invitation to Bid 164th Walkway
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 190.40
E7FE.Invitation to Bid 74th Drainage
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 47.60
E7CA.Invitation to Bid Street Overlay3191732
E7CA.Invitation to Bid Street Overlay
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 231.00
Total :469.00
96344 5/17/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 135132 OPERATIONS REPAIR
check/repair modems
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 165.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 14.69
OPS REPAIR135133
check/repair modems
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 165.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 14.69
18Page:
Packet Page 36 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96344 5/17/2007 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
OPS COMMUNICATIONS135359
Reprogram NIght Hawk
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 742.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 66.08
OPS REPAIR704503
repair mobile radio
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 325.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 27.96
Total :1,520.92
96345 5/17/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 135329 INV#135329 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD
CALIBRATE GHD 02436
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135330 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135330
CALIBRATE GHD 03630
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135331 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135331
CALIBRATE RADAR GHD 03881
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135332 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135332
CALIBRATE RADAR GHD 03891
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
19Page:
Packet Page 37 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96345 5/17/2007 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
INV#135333 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135333
CALIBRATE RADAR FF 11322
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135408 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135408
CALIBRATE RADAR E14920
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135409 CUST #267 EDMONDS PD135409
CALIBRATE RADAR E14922
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135410 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135410
CALIBRATE RADAR GHD 02444
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135411 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135411
CALIBRATE RADAR GHD 03836
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
INV#135412 CUST#267 EDMONDS PD135412
CALIBRATE RADAR GHD 03892
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.12
Total :871.20
96346 5/17/2007 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING Monthly STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOL
State Share of Concealed Pistol
001.000.000.237.190.000.00 630.00
20Page:
Packet Page 38 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :630.00963465/17/2007 070230 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING
96347 5/17/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2914530 SEWER - S-MHCI-25.25-010 & -020~
SEWER - S-MHCI-25.25-010 & -020~
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 1,128.00
S-MCHI-12-010 & -020~
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 420.00
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 131.58
Total :1,679.58
96348 5/17/2007 071596 EBORALL, STEVE EBORALL7834 ART CLASS
ART DAZE #7834
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 75.82
Total :75.82
96349 5/17/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 80228 SUPPLIES
PAINT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.88
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.88
Total :10.76
96350 5/17/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 80279 OPS SUPPLIES
floor dry
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 19.98
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1.78
Total :21.76
96351 5/17/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 152610 INV#152610 CLIENT#3713 EDMONDS PD
EXAM - LAB #6905
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 37.60
DERMAL CYTOLOGY #6905
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 18.40
21Page:
Packet Page 39 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96351 5/17/2007 (Continued)008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL
INV#152662 CLIENT#3713 EDMONDS PD152662
EUTHANIZE LAB #6905
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 20.80
Total :76.80
96352 5/17/2007 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0029143-IN INV#0029143-IN EDMONDS PD - CHAPLAIN
CHAPLAIN BADGE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 76.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.36
Total :87.36
96353 5/17/2007 071425 ESTATE OF LAINE VAILAS 4-03045 #200610098 UB REFUND
UB Refund #200610098 Dixon/ Estate of
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 165.56
Total :165.56
96354 5/17/2007 069940 FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SVC 900JJM0704 INV#900JJM0704 EDMONDS PD
CREDIT CHECK - HOVORKA
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 13.06
Total :13.06
96355 5/17/2007 064131 GAI-TRONICS 44888919 215588
HANDSET SPEAKER
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 303.75
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.34
Total :310.09
96356 5/17/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 43654 STREET - BLDG SAND
STREET - BLDG SAND
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 418.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 37.20
Total :455.20
22Page:
Packet Page 40 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96357 5/17/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9360256474 SUPPLIES
PADLOCKS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 120.78
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.75
Total :131.53
96358 5/17/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5118087 112830-000
NITRIFICATION INHIBITOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 62.40
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 15.05
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 6.81
Total :84.26
96359 5/17/2007 068011 HALLAM, RICHARD 51 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 301.72
Total :301.72
96360 5/17/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2091915 WATER - W-FOSTER-06-010
WATER - W-FOSTER-06-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 329.76
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 29.34
Total :359.10
96361 5/17/2007 071648 HELLICKSON, MICHAEL 5-01675 UB Refund #7-0704-031 VARELA/HELLICKSON
#7-0704-031 Varela/Hellickson
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 245.88
Total :245.88
96362 5/17/2007 066575 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 22159750-002 WATER - EXACATOR W/ BUCKET RENTAL
23Page:
Packet Page 41 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96362 5/17/2007 (Continued)066575 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL
WATER - EXACATOR W/ BUCKET RENTAL
411.000.654.534.800.450.00 593.50
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.450.00 52.83
Total :646.33
96363 5/17/2007 069680 HOLADAY-PARKS INC 44070 BLD20070416/HOLADAY PARKS. THIS IS FOR
BLD20070416/HOLADAY PARKS. THIS IS FOR
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 236.00
Total :236.00
96364 5/17/2007 071647 HOLTE, LINDA 2-27425 UB Ref #7-0703-023 MCCLURG-WOLF/HOLTE
#7-0703-023 McClurg-Wolf/Holte
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 160.78
Total :160.78
96365 5/17/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1030254 LIBRARY - TAPE, BITS, PIPE, POLY
LIBRARY - TAPE, BITS, PIPE, POLY
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 58.96
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.25
STREET - PARTS KIT, WATER CAN, DECK1038471
STREET - PARTS KIT, WATER CAN, DECK
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 39.45
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 3.47
STREET - SCRAPERS AND BLADES1045669
STREET - SCRAPERS AND BLADES
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 49.81
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 4.38
24Page:
Packet Page 42 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96365 5/17/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FAC - NUTS & BOLTS FOR BASKETBALL RIMS1091408
FAC - NUTS & BOLTS FOR BASKETBALL RIMS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.52
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.05
STREET- 2X4'S FOR SUPPORT POLE2031449
STREET- 2X4'S FOR SUPPORT POLE
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 8.84
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 0.79
PW - 1/4" SS Q LK2040662
PW - 1/4" SS Q LK
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.82
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.32
LIBRARY - MEASURE TAPE, TOUCH UP2273132
LIBRARY - MEASURE TAPE, TOUCH UP
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.49
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.99
UNIT 476 - PLUGS AND CONNECTIONS2590320
UNIT 476 - PLUGS AND CONNECTIONS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 49.78
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.38
STREET - LAP SIDING, SIDING SUPPLIES30272
STREET - LAP SIDING, SIDING SUPPLIES
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 52.93
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 4.66
YOST PARK - MOULDINGS3032919
YOST PARK - MOULDINGS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.48
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.03
25Page:
Packet Page 43 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96365 5/17/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
OLD PW - ADAPTOR, SEALANT3034414
OLD PW - ADAPTOR, SEALANT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.21
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.91
PS - 24" GRAB BAR, PLATE31784
PS - 24" GRAB BAR, PLATE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.25
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.25
PS - COURT STEPS - ANCHORS, SPRAY PAINT4031133
PS - COURT STEPS - ANCHORS, SPRAY PAINT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.81
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.12
STORM - DRAIN KITS, PVC SOLVENT,4037977
STORM - DRAIN KITS, PVC SOLVENT,
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 101.89
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 8.97
STREET - SUPPLIES FOR TRUCKS4039723
STREET - SUPPLIES FOR TRUCKS
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 55.88
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 4.92
LIBRARY - ANGLES, DRAWER SLIDERS, SCREWS4070285
LIBRARY - ANGLES, DRAWER SLIDERS, SCREWS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 38.15
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.40
FAC MAINT SUPPLIES - MINI MAGS, TOOL4580547
FAC MAINT SUPPLIES - MINI MAGS, TOOL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 117.84
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.49
26Page:
Packet Page 44 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96365 5/17/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
STORM - HAND TOOL STOCK5039528
STORM - HAND TOOL STOCK
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 585.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 51.48
FAC - BAG FASTENERS, PLASTIC BAGS6090686
FAC - BAG FASTENERS, PLASTIC BAGS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.90
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.44
FS 20 - RETURNED HINGES SEE INVOICE6243635
FS 20 - RETURNED HINGES SEE INVOICE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -7.78
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -0.70
UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES7030756
UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 77.47
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.82
PLAZA RM - PLASTIC BAGS7032070
PLAZA RM - PLASTIC BAGS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.96
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.18
FS 20 - HINGE7040097
FS 20 - HINGE
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.89
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.35
WATER - HOSE NIPPLES7087038
WATER - HOSE NIPPLES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.56
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.68
27Page:
Packet Page 45 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96365 5/17/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FS 20 - HINGES7087873
FS 20 - HINGES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.78
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.70
FAC MAINT - WRENCHES, SUPPLIES7593633
FAC MAINT - WRENCHES, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 68.89
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.14
PS - THRESHOLD, BOLTS, SUPPLIES9047879
PS - THRESHOLD, BOLTS, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.93
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.40
PS - MDF BOARDS, BUNGEES, STRAPS,9047889
PS - MDF BOARDS, BUNGEES, STRAPS,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.02
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.76
SEWER - HOSE, NOZELS, SUPPLIES9085682
SEWER - HOSE, NOZELS, SUPPLIES
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 38.12
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.35
Total :1,650.83
96366 5/17/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17684 E7FE.Design Services thru 04/28/07
E7FE.Design Services thru 04/28/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,649.50
E5JA.Material Testing thru 04/28/0717700
E5JA.Material Testing thru 04/28/07
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 1,592.91
Total :3,242.41
28Page:
Packet Page 46 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96367 5/17/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73150262 CANON IMAGE RUNNER 9070 LEASE
Canon Image Runner 9070 Lease~250-00148
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 1,010.20
Total :1,010.20
96368 5/17/2007 066256 IMSA 10267 STREET - 2 CERTIFICATIONS - ~
STREET - 2 CERTIFICATIONS - ~
111.000.653.542.900.490.00 70.00
STREET - REMAINING AMOUNT DUE FOR10340
STREET - REMAINING AMOUNT DUE FOR
111.000.653.542.900.490.00 140.00
Total :210.00
96369 5/17/2007 061844 INTL CONF OF POLICE CHAPLAINS 21538 INV#21538 EDMONDS PD - ASSINK
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP - ASSINK
001.000.410.521.100.490.00 125.00
Total :125.00
96370 5/17/2007 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMT INC HF27343 INV#HF27343 CUST#W2299 EDMONDS PD
SHRED 34 BOXES ON 4/17/07
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 170.00
Total :170.00
96371 5/17/2007 015270 JONES CHEMICALS INC 345338 54278825
HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 2,949.03
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 259.52
Total :3,208.55
96372 5/17/2007 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER KIDZSOCCER7594 SOCCER CLASSES
29Page:
Packet Page 47 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96372 5/17/2007 (Continued)071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER
KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7594
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 725.90
KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7595
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 683.20
KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7596
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,152.90
KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7597
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 939.40
KIDZ LOVE SOCCER #7598
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 854.00
Total :4,355.40
96373 5/17/2007 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS E2DB.22 E2DB.Services thru 03/31/07
E2DB.Services thru 03/31/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 2,639.57
Total :2,639.57
96374 5/17/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 75377 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
T. Anderson
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 340.20
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 5.90
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 30.80
OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING76367
Chao
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 473.70
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 6.75
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 42.76
30Page:
Packet Page 48 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96374 5/17/2007 (Continued)016600 KROESENS INC
OPS UNIFORMS76368
Chao, Stevens
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 355.70
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 6.90
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 32.27
OPS UNIFORMS77758
White boots, shoes
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 307.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 27.37
Total :1,629.85
96375 5/17/2007 068024 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNKRUCKENBERG8083 GARDEN TOUR
KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN TOUR #8083
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 60.00
Total :60.00
96376 5/17/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1009518284 5580730-1
SAFETY SUPPLIES MSDS
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 694.50
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 37.30
Total :731.80
96377 5/17/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0020966 A5MA.Lidar Mapping thru 04/28/07
A5MA.Lidar Mapping thru 04/28/07
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 19,777.50
Shubin ESLHA Peer Review0020967
Shubin ESLHA Peer Review
001.000.000.245.900.621.00 2,147.00
Total :21,924.50
96378 5/17/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 5007-235 MOWER SUPPLIES
31Page:
Packet Page 49 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96378 5/17/2007 (Continued)068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY
MOWER BLADES
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 153.90
Freight
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 16.91
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 15.20
SUPPLIES5007-311
DISPOSABLE NITRILE GLOVES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.80
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.25
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.21
Total :225.27
96379 5/17/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094311 INV#094311 EDMONDS PD
CERTIFICATE HOLDERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 55.23
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.92
Total :60.15
96380 5/17/2007 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 4517 E5MC.Design service thru 04/20/07
E5MC.Design service thru 04/20/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 8,498.59
Total :8,498.59
96381 5/17/2007 068950 MARYSVILLE FIRE DISTRICT 07-051 TRAINING MISC
Hoover registrtn pump ops
001.000.510.522.200.490.00 229.00
Total :229.00
96382 5/17/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 63721362 123106800
32Page:
Packet Page 50 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96382 5/17/2007 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
FIBERGLASS FABRIC
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.40
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.72
12310680063874295
BATTERIES/BATTERIES FOR CHARGER
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 237.22
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.14
12310680063896917
ALUMINUM CHANNEL
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 154.24
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 18.35
12310680063909826
SPRAYER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 76.26
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.35
12310680063912993
FLANGE GASKET
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 50.16
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.37
12310680063916143
HINGE/GAUGE/EXTENSION CORD
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 232.30
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 15.26
12310680063947797
FLUORESCENT LIGHTS/FACE SHIELD
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 482.19
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 50.28
33Page:
Packet Page 51 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96382 5/17/2007 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
12310680064336283
AIR FILTER/REGULATOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 94.64
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.62
12310680064567897
WELDING KIT/WELDING ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 461.27
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.67
12310680064633016
EXTENSION LADDER/INSULATION/RETANGULAR
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,782.09
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 76.25
Total :3,782.78
96383 5/17/2007 071487 MED-TECH RESOURCE INC 26871 INV#26871 EDMONDS PD
3 VOLT LITHIUM BATTERIES (2 PACK)
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 7.12
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 3.30
INV#27293 EDMONDS PD27293
STREAMLIGHT STINGER BATTERIES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 45.92
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 5.55
Total :61.89
96384 5/17/2007 068309 MERCURY FITNESS REPAIR INC 7040652 FITNESS EQUIPMENT REPAIR
REPAIR OF ANDERSON CENTER FITNESS
001.000.640.575.520.480.00 93.50
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.480.00 8.32
34Page:
Packet Page 52 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :101.82963845/17/2007 068309 068309 MERCURY FITNESS REPAIR INC
96385 5/17/2007 069592 METROCALL Q0298897D INV#Q0298897D ACCT#0298897-0 EDMONDS
PAGER SERVICE 04/27-05/26/07
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 79.98
Total :79.98
96386 5/17/2007 071650 MICROTEL INC 8022 A4404
SWITCH
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 50.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 52.24
Total :102.24
96387 5/17/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 44605 131
PROPANE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 26.01
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.31
Total :28.32
96388 5/17/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 43905 LIBRARY - GLASS CARRIER RENTAL ~
LIBRARY - GLASS CARRIER RENTAL ~
001.000.651.519.920.450.00 20.53
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.450.00 1.83
Total :22.36
96389 5/17/2007 022009 MOTOROLA INC 13592131 OPS COMMUNICATIONS
pagers
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 1,666.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 148.27
Total :1,814.27
96390 5/17/2007 022009 MOTOROLA INC 78056002 INV#78056002 ACCT#1011249259 0001
35Page:
Packet Page 53 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96390 5/17/2007 (Continued)022009 MOTOROLA INC
ANNUAL MAINT AGMT 12/1/06-11/30/07
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 4,548.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 404.77
Total :4,952.77
96391 5/17/2007 023800 NFPA 1169361 ADMIN MISC
Tomberg mbrshp fee
001.000.510.522.100.490.00 150.00
Total :150.00
96392 5/17/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0475856 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0475857
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0477332
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 398.38
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0477337
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02
Total :692.44
96393 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 631984 Office Supplies - HR
36Page:
Packet Page 54 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96393 5/17/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
Office Supplies - HR
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 34.67
Office Supplies - HR, MY, CS
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 13.71
Office Supplies - HR, MY, CS
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 13.71
Office Supplies - HR, MY, CS
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 13.71
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 4.31
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 1.22
Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 1.22
Office Supplies - HR673484
Office Supplies - HR
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 26.43
Service charge
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 1.00
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 2.36
Total :112.34
96394 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 065755 OFFICE SUPPLIES
VIEW BINDERS
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 67.56
FACIAL TISSUE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 6.42
Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 6.02
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.57
37Page:
Packet Page 55 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96394 5/17/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES073160
COMP PLAN BINDERS
125.000.640.575.500.310.00 139.50
INK CARTRIDGE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 26.26
Sales Tax
125.000.640.575.500.310.00 12.41
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.34
OFFICE SUPPLIES187013
FOLDERS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.70
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES225284
COVER STOCK, POST IT NOTES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 28.70
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.55
OFFICE SUPPLIES238125
LASER PAPER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 17.64
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES247475
COPY PAPER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 179.34
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 15.97
38Page:
Packet Page 56 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96394 5/17/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES289318
NAME BADGES/DISCOVERY PROGRAM
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 1.81
RUBBER BANDS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.22
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 0.13
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.23
Total :531.51
96395 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 681331 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 85.93
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 7.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES729841
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 37.41
Service Charge
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 1.00
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 3.33
Total :135.32
96396 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 479212 LAVENDAR COPY PAPER NOT RECEIVED.
LAVENDAR COPY PAPER NOT RECEIVED.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -57.80
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -5.15
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES INCLUDING AVERY571625
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES INCLUDING AVERY
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 249.12
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 22.17
39Page:
Packet Page 57 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :208.34963965/17/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
96397 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 557267 OPS SUPPLIES
map bk sheet protectors
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 80.20
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 7.13
Total :87.33
96398 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 459930 INV#459930 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
2" SLANT RING BINDERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 28.92
SHEET PROTECTORS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.02
SHARPIE MARKERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.26
POCKET MEMO BOOKS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 25.10
LETTER SIZE MANILA FOLDERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 18.66
EASEL PAPER PADS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 172.32
JR LEGAL PADS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 21.64
2 REAMS OF COLORED COPY PAPER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 19.34
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.48
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 15.34
40Page:
Packet Page 58 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96398 5/17/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
INV#655601 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD655601
BOISE X-9 PAPER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 316.10
CARTON OF TISSUES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 48.33
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 32.44
Total :724.95
96399 5/17/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 457369 PW ADMIN - BUSINESS CARD HOLDERS
PW ADMIN - BUSINESS CARD HOLDERS
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 16.76
START LEA BK SFTFLX BNDR
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 54.23
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 6.31
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - RUBBERBANKS,544637
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - RUBBERBANKS,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 29.28
SVC FEE
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 2.61
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES570803
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 82.41
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 7.34
PW ADMIN - 2GB STORE N GO626079
PW ADMIN - 2GB STORE N GO
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 51.84
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 4.62
41Page:
Packet Page 59 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96399 5/17/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
PW ADMIN - RETURNED BROKEN BUSINESS639859
PW ADMIN - RETURNED BROKEN BUSINESS
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 -16.76
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 -1.50
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - ENVELOPES, FOLDERS,671609
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - ENVELOPES, FOLDERS,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 70.78
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 6.30
Total :315.22
96400 5/17/2007 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER April COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 734.44
PSEA 1 , 2,3 Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 17,700.55
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 200.00
State Patrol Death Investigations
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 949.87
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 1,949.14
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 916.34
Total :22,450.34
96401 5/17/2007 067783 OPSWIN TECH SUPPORT NETWORK 4812 OPS NETWORK SUPPORT
OPS NETWORK SUPPORT
411.000.656.538.800.410.11 850.00
Total :850.00
96402 5/17/2007 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS PACIFICNWFLOAT8143 FLOAT TRIP
SECRET SKAGIT BIRDING ADVENTURE~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 271.82
42Page:
Packet Page 60 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :271.82964025/17/2007 071402 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS
96403 5/17/2007 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 262537 Copier Maint. for PW
Copier Maint. for PW
001.000.650.519.910.480.00 117.46
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.480.00 10.45
Total :127.91
96404 5/17/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 45009 STREET - BRUSHDUMP FEES
STREET - BRUSHDUMP FEES
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 271.66
Total :271.66
96405 5/17/2007 065787 PATRIOT DIAMOND INC 90556 WATER - 18" DIAMOND SUPER PROF ASPHALT
WATER - 18" DIAMOND SUPER PROF ASPHALT
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 520.00
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 20.00
Total :540.00
96406 5/17/2007 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC PCASH0515 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
43Page:
Packet Page 61 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96406 5/17/2007 (Continued)008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC
PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 8.89
GYMNASTIC SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 30.15
OWEN CADDY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
001.000.640.574.350.430.00 9.70
SUPPLIES FOR BEACH RANGER PROGRAMS
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 9.74
TWILIGHT TRAIL WALK SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 5.99
CUPS FOR RANGER SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 7.07
ICE & LEMONADE FOR SKATE PARK DEDICATION
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 7.49
SUPPLIES FOR NEW TOUCH TANK
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 8.55
SUPPLIES FOR FLORETUM CLUB CITY PLANTING
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.10
SUPPLIES FOR PLANTING
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 28.34
TOUCH TANK SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 9.65
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 55.88
FILM DEVELOPMENT
001.000.640.575.560.490.00 8.11
PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 22.19
Total :227.85
96407 5/17/2007 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC Pool 2007 Pool Start Up Fund for 2007
Pool Start Up Fund for 2007
001.000.000.111.700.000.00 125.00
Total :125.00
44Page:
Packet Page 62 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96408 5/17/2007 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 1137784 SR CENTER - BREAKER
SR CENTER - BREAKER
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.30
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.81
Total :22.11
96409 5/17/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 7665 OPS SUPPLIES
M-16 supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 22.38
OPS SUPPLIES7887
air dryer (M-16)
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 45.49
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 4.05
Total :71.92
96410 5/17/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 3689976003 200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 428.37
Fire Station # 165322323139
Fire Station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 666.72
Total :1,095.09
96411 5/17/2007 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 076652 MARKER
MARKER: FAULKNER
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 365.00
INSCRIPTION76653
INSCRIPTION: HAIST
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00
INSCRIPTION76654
INSCRIPTION: BOLTON
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00
45Page:
Packet Page 63 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96411 5/17/2007 (Continued)030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
INSCRIPTION77186
INSCRIPTION: HELGESEN
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 79.00
INSCRIPTION77187
INSCRIPTION: ROBERTS
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 79.00
Total :673.00
96412 5/17/2007 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL 3003921-D STORM - STREET SWEEPING DUMP
STORM - STREET SWEEPING DUMP
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 2,401.20
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 86.44
Total :2,487.64
96413 5/17/2007 071476 REMINGTON ARMS CO 41564790 INV#41564790 LOCALLETAX EDMONDS PD
VARIOUS GUN PARTS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 117.19
Freight
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 8.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 11.13
Total :136.32
96414 5/17/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412762874 STREET - DUMPED CONCRETE
STREET - DUMPED CONCRETE
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 522.37
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 29.25
Total :551.62
96415 5/17/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 4/29/07 INV FOR APRIL 2007, EDMONDS PD
46Page:
Packet Page 64 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96415 5/17/2007 (Continued)071467 S MORRIS COMPANY
4/2 PICKUP 6 DEAD ANIMALS
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 58.50
4/9 PICKUP 4 DEAD ANIMALS
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 39.00
4/16 PICKUP 1 DEAD ANIMAL
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 9.75
4/23 PICKUP 5 DEAD ANIMALS
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 48.75
Total :156.00
96416 5/17/2007 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 115653 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Woods
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 1,363.00
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 6.12
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 121.85
Total :1,490.97
96417 5/17/2007 066738 SETCOM CORPORATION 19609 Unit 100 Super Mic + & Conversion Labor
Unit 100 Super Mic + & Conversion Labor
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 202.98
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 7.87
Total :210.85
96418 5/17/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 259716 GARDENING SUPPLIES
ASSORTED PLANTS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 157.44
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.01
Total :171.45
96419 5/17/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 259720 WATER - 3 WAY SOIL
47Page:
Packet Page 65 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96419 5/17/2007 (Continued)036955 SKY NURSERY
WATER - 3 WAY SOIL
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 79.88
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.11
Total :86.99
96420 5/17/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2460018753 CITY PARK RESTROOMS
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 40.88
PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP2470011830
PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,154.57
PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS3280017173
PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 155.59
PARK GAZEBO3660016779
PARK GAZEBO
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.26
PLAYFIELD LIGHTS3690017839
PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 105.98
CITY PARK SOUTH RESTROOMS & COVERED5030011778
CITY PARK SOUTH RESTROOMS & COVERED
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 89.49
Total :1,575.77
96421 5/17/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 137009190 620-001-500-3
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 6.88
463-001-705-3985010083
23219 74TH AVE W
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 29.74
48Page:
Packet Page 66 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96421 5/17/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
958-001-000-8989012576
WWTP/ELECTRICITY
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 28,121.85
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1,687.31
Total :29,845.78
96422 5/17/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2400010746 LIFT STATION #10
LIFT STATION #10
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 146.56
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3970013581
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74
Total :176.30
96423 5/17/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 34664 INV#34664 EDMONDS PD
MAGMATES COMPTON
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 4.50
MAGMATE - ANDERSON
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.25
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 2.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 0.58
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.20
Total :9.53
96424 5/17/2007 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 48641 DUMP CHARGES
DUMP CHARGES/PARK MAINTENANCE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 463.32
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 16.68
Total :480.00
49Page:
Packet Page 67 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96425 5/17/2007 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000170460 SOW5101
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 110.00
Total :110.00
96426 5/17/2007 067809 SNOHOMISH COUNTY FINANCE I000170552 A CUST # SERS-EDM
800 MHZ Int Billing 1st 1/2 2007 COE
001.000.390.592.220.830.00 27,119.68
CUST # SERS-EDMI000170553 B
800 MHZ Int 1st 1/2 2007 Sno-Com
001.000.390.592.220.830.00 7,421.97
Total :34,541.65
96427 5/17/2007 061224 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TOMORROW 2007 Dues 2007 Dues
2007 Dues
001.000.390.519.900.490.00 10,406.00
Total :10,406.00
96428 5/17/2007 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER April 2007 crime victims
crime victims
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 663.45
Total :663.45
96429 5/17/2007 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT C000106 FAC MAINT - 4- HEP B
FAC MAINT - 4- HEP B
001.000.651.519.920.410.00 268.00
Total :268.00
96430 5/17/2007 071646 SORENSON, ERIC 4-29400 UB Ref RE: #4203-986828 HERSHMAN/SORENSON
RE: #4203-986828 Hershman/Sorenson
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 54.40
Total :54.40
96431 5/17/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING
50Page:
Packet Page 68 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96431 5/17/2007 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 36.76
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 2.21
Total :38.97
96432 5/17/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4111043-0001-04 2397
UNIFORM/PALADA
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 273.30
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 26.70
23974111047-0001-04-
UNIFORM/PALADA
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 59.21
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 5.79
Total :365.00
96433 5/17/2007 070677 SPRINT Eng.April 2007 Engineering Nextel thru 04/24/07
Engineering Nextel thru 04/24/07
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 541.62
Total :541.62
96434 5/17/2007 070684 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 141921 53769
C-161 SCREENING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 831.60
Total :831.60
96435 5/17/2007 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L64847 APRIL 07
51Page:
Packet Page 69 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
52
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96435 5/17/2007 (Continued)039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
April 07 Audit Fees
001.000.390.519.900.510.00 7,571.73
April 07 Audit Fees
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 315.49
April 07 Audit Fees
411.000.654.534.800.510.00 1,261.96
April 07 Audit Fees
411.000.655.535.800.510.00 1,261.96
April 07 Audit Fees
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 1,261.96
April 07 Audit Fees
111.000.653.543.300.510.00 315.49
April 07 Audit Fees
511.000.657.548.680.510.00 630.96
Total :12,619.55
96436 5/17/2007 071585 STERICYCLE INC 0004000836 INV#0004000836 CUST#6076358 EDMONDS
MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 10.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 0.36
Total :10.36
96437 5/17/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 999854 SR CENTER - WALL FIXTURES
SR CENTER - WALL FIXTURES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 496.08
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 45.39
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.19
Total :589.66
96438 5/17/2007 071652 STRAIGHT LINE FENCE &1230 E1BA.Hand Rail Construction
E1BA.Hand Rail Construction
112.506.630.595.330.650.00 2,252.05
52Page:
Packet Page 70 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
53
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :2,252.05964385/17/2007 071652 071652 STRAIGHT LINE FENCE &
96439 5/17/2007 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 8040 TELEMETRY SYSTEM MATERIAL PROCUREMENT
TELEMETRY SYSTEM MATERIAL PROCUREMENT
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 1,602.80
Sales Tax
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 142.65
Total :1,745.45
96440 5/17/2007 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA 000450 INTERNET ACCESS
INTERNET ACCESS FOR CEMETERY SEXTON
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 17.95
Total :17.95
96441 5/17/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1497413 E1DB.Invitation to Bid 164th Walkway
E1DB.Invitation to Bid 164th Walkway
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 82.95
E7FE.Invitation to Bid 74th Drainage
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 20.73
E7CA.Invitation to Bid Street Overlay1497414
E7CA.Invitation to Bid Street Overlay
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 100.80
Total :204.48
96442 5/17/2007 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 05/03/2007 DS Subscription for 12 months 6/1/07
DS Subscription for 12 months 6/1/07
001.000.620.558.800.490.00 141.00
Total :141.00
96443 5/17/2007 071119 THERMO ELECTRON CORP 137441 5257600
C-248 CEM CALIBRATION
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,058.00
Freight
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 40.90
53Page:
Packet Page 71 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
54
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96443 5/17/2007 (Continued)071119 THERMO ELECTRON CORP
5257600137447
C-248 CEM CALIBRATION
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 953.00
Freight
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 26.14
Total :2,078.04
96444 5/17/2007 068322 TRANE 7493712 PS - MAINT CONTRACT - QUARTERLY PMT MAY
PS - MAINT CONTRACT - QUARTERLY PMT MAY
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 274.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 24.43
Total :298.93
96445 5/17/2007 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 7049067 utility locates~
utility locates~
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 91.19
utility locates~
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 91.19
utility locates~
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 91.22
Total :273.60
96446 5/17/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.02
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.37
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM425-776-5316
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 104.09
Total :191.48
96447 5/17/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-672-7132 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE
54Page:
Packet Page 72 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
55
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96447 5/17/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 51.91
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 44.02
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.40
Total :136.33
96448 5/17/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0551644298 OPS COMMS
Air card
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 60.03
Total :60.03
96449 5/17/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 2133835038 INV#2133835038 ACCT#470497482-00001
CELL PHONES 04/24-5/23/07
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 124.58
Total :124.58
96450 5/17/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 206-706-3334 C/A 370106564-00002
Cell Phone Jim Stevens
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 50.00
425-308-9867269992985-1
cell phone-water watch
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 36.11
206-999-9374464229910-1
sewer lead cell phone
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 68.13
425-870-0617469985965-1
Cell phone-Jim Waite
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 29.36
Cell phone-Jim Waite
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 29.35
55Page:
Packet Page 73 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
56
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96450 5/17/2007 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
CELL PHONE-STREET LEAD570091643-00001
CELL PHONE-STREET LEAD
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 33.98
Total :246.93
96451 5/17/2007 047605 WA ST TREASURER LINDA ROSS L Ross STATE LICENSING FEE FOR NOTARY
L Ross STATE LICENSING FEE FOR NOTARY
001.000.620.558.800.490.00 30.00
Total :30.00
96452 5/17/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I06016423 I06016423 EDMONDS PD
BACKGROUND CHECKS - 04/07
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 24.00
Total :24.00
96453 5/17/2007 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 0745285-2677-0 202-0001256-2677-0
ASH DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.474.65 2,509.24
Total :2,509.24
96454 5/17/2007 062552 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 1458 WEF RENEWAL/KOHO
WEF RENEWAL/KOHO
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 107.00
Total :107.00
96455 5/17/2007 071651 WESTCON INC S68054 PANEL METER
PANEL METER
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 550.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 8.30
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 49.69
Total :607.99
96456 5/17/2007 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 33649001 PLANTING SUPPLIES
56Page:
Packet Page 74 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
57
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96456 5/17/2007 (Continued)064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS
City Wide Planting Imp
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 125.00
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 11.13
PLANTING SUPPLIES33650001
City Wide Planting Imp
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 208.75
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 18.58
PLANTING SUPPLIES33651001
City Wide Planting Imp
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 288.00
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 25.63
PLANTING SUPPLIES33652001
City Wide Planting Imp
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 142.75
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 12.70
PLANTING SUPPLIES33653001
City Wide Planting Imp
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 453.90
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 40.39
Total :1,326.83
96457 5/17/2007 071645 WILCOX DAIRY FARMS LLC Bus Lic Ref REFUND OVERPMT OF BUSINESS LIC
Refund overpmt of Busines Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
96458 5/17/2007 071644 WILCOX FARMS INC Bus Lic Ref REFUND OVERPMT OF BUSINESS LIC
Refund overpmt of Business Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
57Page:
Packet Page 75 of 203
05/17/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
58
12:49:23PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :40.00964585/17/2007 071644 071644 WILCOX FARMS INC
96459 5/17/2007 063008 WSDOT/WST2 CENTER 01350CN Registration Hawkins Pedestrian
Registration Hawkins Pedestrian
001.000.620.532.200.490.00 135.00
Total :135.00
Bank total :379,290.90165 Vouchers for bank code :front
379,290.90Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report165
58Page:
Packet Page 76 of 203
AM-990 2.D.
Claim for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Natalia Sedykh (amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages.
Previous Council Action
Not applicable.
Narrative
A Claim for Damages has been recieved from the following individual:
Natalia Sedykh
17005 77th Pl. W.
Edmonds, WA 98026
(Amount undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Sedykh Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/15/2007 03:32 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/15/2007 09:03 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 01:25 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 05/14/2007 10:54
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/16/2007
Packet Page 77 of 203
Packet Page 78 of 203
AM-995 2.E.
2007 Street Overlay Program Award of Contract
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report of bids opened on May 8, 2007 for the 2007 Street Overlay Program and award of contract
to Wilder Construction Company ($859,815.30).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council award a contract to Wilder Construction Company in the amount of $859,815.30 for the
2007 Street Overlay Program (Schedules A-1, A-2, B, C-1 through C-5, C-14, C-18 and C-21).
Previous Council Action
On March 27, 2007, Council authorized Staff to advertise for bids on the 2007 Street Overlay
Program.
Narrative
On May 8, 2007, the City received two bids for the 2007 Street Overlay Program contract. The bid
tabulation summary is provided as Attachment 1. The bids ranged from a low of $1,138,784.30 to
$1,503,398.25 for all bid schedules. The engineer’s estimate was $1,123,131.50 for all bid
schedules. The low bid was submitted by Wilder Construction Company. A review of the low
bidder’s record was satisfactory.
The invitation to bid included a total of 24 bid schedules for various different streets and project
requirements within the City. In addition to street overlays, the invitation for bids included some
street patching, walkway/crosswalk and ADA curb ramp improvements, C-curb installation, and
parks paving improvements (Mathay Ballinger sport court). The 2007 adopted budget includes the
following amounts for these projects:
Fund 111 Street Patching $25,000
Fund 112: Overlays - Utility Streets $320,00
Walkways & Bikeways Citywide $15,000
Street Improvements Citywide $15,000
Total Fund 112 $350,000
Fund 125 (REET 2 - Transportation):
Overlays – Citywide $550,000
ADA Curb Ramp Improvements $20,000
Packet Page 79 of 203
ADA Curb Ramp Improvements $20,000
Total Fund 125 (REET2 - Trans) $570,000
Fund 125 (REET2 – Parks Improvement) includes sufficient funds in the adopted 2007 budget for
Citywide Park Improvements/Miscellaneous Small Projects to fund the small project to pave the
Mathay Ballinger sport court (Schedule C-21) that is included in the bid documents.
In addition, the $25,000 included in the 2007 Fund 111 budget is sufficient to fund the street
patching work (Schedules A-1 and A-2).
However, the $920,000 ($350,000 plus $570,000) budgeted in Fund 112 and Fund 125 (REET2
Transportation) is not sufficient to award all the remaining bid schedules. The Public Works
Department has reviewed the bid schedules and recommends that the following schedules/streets
are the highest priority to accomplish within the budget available:
Schedule B C-curb Installation $2,730
Schedule C-1 80th Place West, north of Sierra Drive $39,305
Schedule C-2 216th Street SW, from 8704 to 8720 $14,550
Schedule C-3 77th Place W, north and south of 242nd $42,090
Schedule C-4 78th Place W, north and south of 242nd $40,220
Schedule C-5 242nd Street SW, west of 76th Ave W $128,024
Schedule C-14 230th Street SW, 76th Ave W to Hwy 99 $64,727
Schedule C-18 76th Ave W, 212th St SW to 220th St SW $506,257
A summary of the bid schedules recommended for award compared to budget available is provided
as Attachment 2.
A major road included in the overlay project this year is 76th Avenue West, from 212th Street SW
to 220th Street SW. This work will require extensive coordination and traffic control. Staff has
already initiated coordination with Stevens Hospital and other medical clinics and businesses along
76th Avenue West. Based on input we received from our contact with these facilities along 76th
Avenue West, the contract documents require that the actual paving of this major section of 76th
Avenue West be done on Saturday and Sunday only. Other operations involved such as grinding,
utilities adjustments, sidewalk work, paint striping, etc. will be allowed during normal work hours,
but the paving must be done on the weekend. The contract also includes clear language that the
contractor must maintain continuous access for emergency response vehicles to the hospital, clinics
and businesses.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Bid Tabulation
Link: Bid Schedule Award Recommendation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 05/16/2007 11:53 AM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 05/16/2007 12:24 PM APRV
3 Public Works Noel Miller 05/16/2007 01:19 PM APRV
4 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 05/16/2007 02:30 PM APRV
Packet Page 80 of 203
4 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 05/16/2007 02:30 PM APRV
5 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 02:37 PM APRV
6 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/16/2007 06:59 PM APRV
7 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 08:30 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 05/16/2007 07:51
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 81 of 203
Bid Results
City of Edmonds
2007 Street Overlay Program
E7CA/c260
Engineers Estimate
Wilder
Construction
Rinker
Materials
Schedule A-1 Patching 3-Foot Width Miscellaneous Locations (Fund 111)4,500.00 8,200.00 7,000.00
Schedule A-2 Patching 6-Foot Width Miscellaneous Locations (Fund 111)8,240.00 9,682.00 13,390.00
Schedule B C-Curb Installation / City-Wide 5,250.00 2,730.00 10,500.00
Schedule C-1 80th Place West, North of Sierra Drive 45,510.00 39,305.00 46,805.00
Schedule C-2 8704-8720 216th Street SW Neighborhood 11,835.00 14,550.00 24,370.00
Schedule C-3 77the Place West, North & South of 242nd Street SW 44,475.00 42,090.00 57,230.00
Schedule C-4 78th Place West, North & South of 242nd Street SW 42,655.00 40,220.00 59,925.00
Schedule C-5 242nd Street SW, West of 76th Avenue West 133,167.50 128,024.00 193,698.00
Schedule C-6 78th Place West, North of 238th Street SW 21,255.00 18,975.00 28,340.00
Schedule C-7 238th Place SW, 76th Avenue West to 78th Avenue West 55,789.00 44,490.00 85,235.00
Schedule C-8 77th Avenue West, 238th Place SW to End of Road 21,695.00 20,985.00 37,755.00
Schedule C-9 77th Place West, North of 238th Place SW 10,625.00 10,105.00 16,910.00
Schedule C-10 80th Avenue West, South of 238th Street SW 16,515.00 14,730.00 23,670.00
Schedule C-11 78th Avenue West, 238th Street SW to 236th Street SW 28,771.00 25,350.00 41,140.00
Schedule C-12 79th Avenue West, South of 238th Street SW 15,617.50 13,950.00 23,297.50
Schedule C-13 80th Place West, North of 240th Street SW 14,030.00 13,375.00 21,865.00
Schedule C-14 230th Street SW, 76th Avenue West to Highway 99 63,175.00 64,727.50 101,982.50
Schedule C-15 230th Street SW, 75th Avenue West to 76th Avenue West 19,487.50 17,960.00 23,647.50
Schedule C-16 239th Place SW, West of 76th Avenue West 44,580.00 40,899.00 58,545.00
Schedule C-17 237th Street SW, South of 236th Street SW 25,505.00 22,685.00 31,016.25
Schedule C-18 76th Avenue West, 220th Street SW to 212th Street SW 443,182.50 506,257.50 498,712.50
Schedule C-19 80th Avenue West, North of 240th Street SW 10,802.00 9,760.00 14,500.00
Schedule C-20 Crosswalk & Corner Park Improvementys at Fifth and Maple 30,480.00 25,705.00 71,885.00
Schedule C-21 Mathay Ballinger Sport Court off 78th Place West (Fund 125)5,989.50 4,029.30 11,979.00
TOTALS 1,123,131.50 1,138,784.30 1,503,398.25
Packet Page 82 of 203
2007 Street Overlays - Recommended Award Schedules vs. Budget Date: May 10, 2007
Recommended Contact Award Charge to Fund
Schedule Amount 111 112 125 (Trans) 125(Parks)
A-1 Asphalt Patch, 3 ' wide $8,200.00 $8,200.00
A-2 Asphalt Patch, 6 ' wide $9,682.00 $9,682.00
B Install C-Curb $2,730.00 $2,730.00
C-1 80th Pl W, N. of Sierra Dr (storm)$39,305.00 $39,305.00
C-2 8704-8720 216th ST SW (water)$14,550.00 $14,550.00
C-3 77th PL W, N & S of 242nd (water) $42,090.00 $42,090.00
C-4 78th PL W, N & S of 242nd (water) $40,220.00 $40,220.00
C-5 242nd St SW, W of 76th (strm & wtr) $128,024.00 $128,024.00
C-14 230th ST SW, 76th to Hwy 99 (water) $64,727.50 $64,727.50
C-18 76th Ave W, 212th to 220th $506,257.50 $506,257.50
C-21 Mathay Ballinger Sport Court $4,029.30 $4,029.30
Contract Award Amount Total $859,815.30 $17,882.00 $331,646.50 $506,257.50 $4,029.30
Plus: Other Costs
Contract Admin $30,000.00 $30,000.00
Contingency $52,000.00 $5,000.00 $18,000.00 $27,000.00 $2,000.00
Testing Lab Services $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Advertising $500.00 $500.00
1% Art $0.00 $0.00
Total Other Costs $87,500.00 $5,000.00 $18,000.00 $62,500.00 $2,000.00
Grand Total, Contract Award Plus Other Costs $947,315.30 $22,882.00 $349,646.50 $568,757.50 $6,029.30
Budget: $25,000.00 $350,000.00 $570,000.00 $145,000.00
OK? yes yes yes yes
Packet Page 83 of 203
Packet Page 84 of 203
AM-993 2.F.
Old Woodway Elementary School Demolition
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Dave Gebert Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Report of bids opened on May 10, 2007 for the Old Woodway Elementary School Demolition
project and award of contract to R.W. Rhine, Inc.($344,605.34).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council award a contract to R.W. Rhine, Inc. in the amount of $344,605.34 for the Old Woodway
Elementary School Demolition project (Schedule A).
Previous Council Action
On April 3, 2007, Council authorized Staff to advertise for bids for the Old Woodway Elementary
School Demolition project.
Narrative
On May 10, 2007, the City received seven bids for the Old Woodway Elementary School
Demolition contract. The bid tabulation summary is provided as Attachment 1. The bid
documents included two bid schedules, Schedules A and B. The bids ranged from a low of
$364,882.52 to a high of $1,228,065.30 for both bid schedules. The engineer’s estimate was
$835,203.11 for both bid schedules. The low bid was submitted by R.W. Rhine, Inc. A review of
the low bidder’s record was satisfactory. Because the low bid was significantly lower than the
engineer’s estimate, the bidder was requested to confirm his bid in writing and has done so.
The bid documents include comprehensive specifications for abatement and disposal of hazardous
materials and demolition of the school buildings. The invitation to bid included two bid schedules.
Schedule A is the Base Bid for all work as specified in the bid documents and including the
estimated quantities of hazardous materials abatement and disposal included on the project plans.
Schedule B includes bid unit prices for additional quantities of hazardous material abatement and
disposal in the event actual quantities exceed the estimated quantities. Initial contract award will
include only Schedule A. R. W. Rhine’s (low bidder’s) bid for Schedule A is $344,605.34.
The adopted 2007 Fund 125 (Parks Improvement) Capital Budget includes $1,000,000 for
demolition of the Old Woodway Elementary School and beginning construction of a park on the
site. Sufficient funds are included in the budget to award the demolition contract to R.W. Rhine,
Inc. and cover potential contingencies.
Fiscal Impact
Packet Page 85 of 203
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Bid Tabulation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Development Services Duane Bowman 05/15/2007 02:57 PM APRV
2 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 05/15/2007 03:22 PM APRV
3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/15/2007 03:32 PM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/15/2007 09:03 PM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 01:25 PM APRV
Form Started By: Dave Gebert Started On: 05/15/2007 02:41
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/16/2007
Packet Page 86 of 203
Bid Tabulation
City of Edmonds
Old Woodway Elementary School Demolition (E5MC/c229)
Bids Opened May 10, 2007
Schedule
Engineer's
Estimate R.W. Rhine J. Harper Nuprecon Rivers Edge 3 Kings Wyser
Advanced
Construction
A - Base Bid $799,042.86 $344,605.34 $392,803.39 $397,743.09 $507,197.69 $580,175.64 $821,160.45 $1,175,521.05
B - Unit Prices for Additional
Quantities of Haz Mat $36,160.25 $20,277.18 $27,886.57 $58,275.11 $22,921.00 $46,189.94 $35,446.95 $52,544.25
Total $835,203.11 $364,882.52 $420,689.96 $456,018.20 $530,118.69 $626,365.58 $856,607.40 $1,228,065.30
Packet Page 87 of 203
AM-996 2.G.
July 4 Contract
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Renee McRae Time:Consent
Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract with the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
for the 4th of July parade and fireworks display.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the Mayor to sign the 4th of July contract.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The major change to this year's contract is the addition of the use of the Frances Anderson Playfield
and Amphitheater for family oriented activities.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: July 4 Contract
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 01:25 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/16/2007 06:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 08:30 AM APRV
Form Started By: Renee
McRae
Started On: 05/16/2007 09:36
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 88 of 203
CONTRACT
THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Wednesday, July 4, 2007
The following is an agreement between the CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and
the GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as “Chamber”).
WHEREAS, the Chamber proposes to conduct a public celebration honoring Independence Day - 4th of
July through a parade and fireworks display; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to participate in the sponsorship of such
events by providing the consideration set forth in this agreement in order to enhance the safety of the
public celebrations for its citizens and to offer a reasonable alternative to the use of private fireworks
which the Council finds in many situations to be unsafe; NOW, THEREFORE
1. Responsibilities of the City
City shall provide:
1.1 Use of City streets as diagrammed in Exhibit A - Parade Route, for parade to occur on July 4th,
2007. City will provide traffic barriers and will set up and take down sound system to be
located at the Edmonds Theater. City shall put up banners at approved sites.
1.2 Use of Civic Center Playfield for setup to start at 9:00 a.m. and Fireworks to occur
approximately 10 p.m., July 4, 2007.
1.3 Use of 6th Avenue South between Bell Street and Sprague Street from 6:00 p.m. until 11:00
p.m.
1.4 Barricades at 6th Avenue South and Bell and 6th Avenue South and Sprague.
1.5 A power hookup at the west end of the grandstand and power for the band.
1.6 Two signs at each entrance to the Park indicating no fireworks or alcohol allowed.
1.7 City is responsible for stringing flags, caution tape or line that clearly delineates spectator areas
from fireworks staging areas.
1.8 The City shall provide access to the Frances Anderson Playfield and Amphitheater from 9:00
a.m. to approximately 10:30 p.m., July 4, 2007.
2. Responsibilities of the Chamber
In consideration of the above, Chamber agrees:
2.1 To assume all responsibility for coordination of the 4th of July Parade including: Hire off-duty
police officers to police the route. Assure that all participants are informed of and abide by the
parade rules to insure that no participants draw people viewing the parade onto the parade
route.
2.2 To obtain the necessary Street Banner Application (from Public Works 425-771-0235) and
Parade Permit (Police Department 425-771-0200). Fees for the preceding two permits will be
waived for this event. A Street Use Permit is not needed. Chamber will ensure that pyrotechnic
1
Packet Page 89 of 203
provider submits Application for Fireworks Display Permit accompanied by a $30.00 public
display permit fee (Edmonds Fire Department-Fire Marshall 425-771-0215). A copy of their
State pyrotechnic license shall be provided with their application. To obtain ASCAP and any
other copyright licenses necessary.
2.3 To provide for security and sani-cans along the parade route and fireworks display.
2.4 To pick up, deliver, and return to storage in City Park gazebo and Parks Maintenance area all
needed 3’ X 10’ and 10’ X 10’ staging sections.
2.5 To hook up power made available by the City at the west end of the grandstand.
2.6 To provide 10 yards of sand for the pyrotechnic display and provisions for cleanup and removal
after the event.
2.7 To assume all responsibility for fireworks display. A State-licensed pyrotechnics operator shall
abide by local ordinance and make necessary permit applications for local approval. State
guidelines and operational requirements shall be adhered to for safe operation of fireworks.
2.8 To authorize a maximum of three stationary self-contained vendors on closed sections of 5th or
Main Streets off the parade route. No vendors will be authorized along the parade route. To
authorize not more than ten vendors on 6th Avenue South between Bell Street and Sprague for
the evening fireworks. Vendors shall operate at specified locations and shall not block park
entrances or fire hydrant. Vendors must be self-contained; no power hookups are available for
vendors. Vendors are responsible for having appropriate permits and for compliance with all
local and state requirements.
2.9 To provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing commercial general liability insurance written
on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage.
City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance
policy and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to
the Certificate of Insurance. The insurance policy shall contain a clause stating that coverage
shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except
with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. The City shall be named as an insured on the
Chamber’s General Liability insurance policy. The insurance policy shall contain , or be
endorsed to contain that the Chamber’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance. Any
insurance, self insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of
the Chamber’s insurance and shall not contribute to it. The Chamber shall provide a certificate
of insurance evidencing the required insurance before using the property described here in.
Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII.
2.10 To remove all garbage to the size of a cigarette butt, including metal and litter debris,
equipment, and any and all other items made necessary by or used in the provision of this
event.
2.11 To defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
harmless from any claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out
of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, including actions or inactions of
persons participating or providing services in the event or from spectators, citizens, and other
persons attending the events.
2.12 In addition, the parties acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of Initiative 901 as codified
in Chapter 70.160 RCW (herein after the "smoking ban"), smoking is prohibited in indoor
areas, within 25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas where public employees of the
City, and employees of any vendor at the event or of the contracting organization are required
2
Packet Page 90 of 203
to be. This general description of the provisions of the initiative is included for the purpose of
reference and is not intended to expand or contract the obligations created by the smoking ban.
The Chamber warrants that it will comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services
and advice of the Snohomish County Health District in assuring compliance during the event
described in this agreement.
2.13 The Chamber’s use of the Frances Anderson Playfield and Amphitheater shall be solely for
family-oriented activities. The Chamber may authorize the use of up to four vendors, provided
that it provides at least three sani-cans and a wash station at the location. The Frances
Anderson Playfield and Amphitheater shall be utilized under the same terms and conditions as
set forth with respect to other portions of the property, and this location shall be included in and
covered under the Certificate of Insurance to be provided pursuant to 2.9.
2.14 The Chamber shall be responsible to restore all public spaces to their original condition,
including removing and disposing of any and all litter and trash.
3. Sole Agreement: Amendment
This written agreement shall be and is the sole understanding of the parties. No prior oral or written
representation or understanding shall alter the terms of this contract unless specifically incorporated by
reference and attached hereto. All amendments to this contract shall be in writing and signed by both
parties and made prior to the date which they purport to be effective.
DATED this ______ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY OF EDMONDS: GREATER EDMONDS
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE:
______________________________ ________________________________
Mayor Gary Haakenson Jan Vance, Executive Director
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
______________________________
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk
CITY ATTORNEY:
______________________________
W. Scott Snyder
3
Packet Page 91 of 203
4
Packet Page 92 of 203
4th of July Parade Participant’s Map
Booths will be on the east side of 6th. They will not block park entrances or fire hydrant.
Civic Center Playfield
Sp
r
a
g
u
e
Be
l
l
6th Avenue
Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
4th of July Fireworks and Evening Festivities
Vendor Area
on 6th Ave. N
5
Packet Page 93 of 203
AM-997 2.H.
Taste of Edmonds Contract
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Renee McRae Time:Consent
Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract with the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
for the Taste of Edmonds.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the Mayor to sign the Taste of Edmonds contract.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
There are no major changes to this year's contract.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 2007 Taste of Edmonds Contract
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 01:25 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/16/2007 06:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 08:30 AM APRV
Form Started By: Renee
McRae
Started On: 05/16/2007 09:44
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 94 of 203
CONTRACT
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
August 8-14, 2007
The following is an agreement between CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as
the “City”), and the GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter
referred to as the “Chamber”).
WHEREAS, the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce has for a number of years
conducted a public event known as “A Taste of Edmonds” and proposes to do so again
in 2007; and
WHEREAS; the City Council finds that A Taste of Edmonds provides distinct benefits to
the City by showcasing Edmonds’ restaurants and other local businesses while providing
a unique recreational opportunity for its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such an event enhances tourism and promotes
economic development as well as providing an opportunity for good clean fun to its
citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE,
1. Responsibilities and Rights of City
1.1 City shall provide use of surfaces of Civic Center Field (excluding the tennis
courts), Bell Street including Centennial Plaza between 5th & 6th Avenues, and 6th Avenue
from Bell Street north to Daley Street for use by Chamber for the “Taste of Edmonds”
event, so as to allow for the following:
(a) The event setup shall begin on August 8, 2007, at 8:00 a.m. on Civic
Center Field.
(b) All surfaces listed shall remain available to the “Taste of Edmonds” until
final cleanup by August 14, 2007, at noon.
(c) City shall designate eight (8) additional handicapped parking spaces to be
located in an area to be agreed upon by City and Chamber officials with barricades to be
in place at close of business (5pm) Wednesday, August 8, 2007.
1.2 All use and configuration of structures, booths and other permanent or
temporary facilities used in the event may be inspected and reviewed by City Fire Chief,
Police Chief, Building Official and Parks and Recreation Director or their designees to
determine the facilities in use comply with the provisions of State and local law, as well
as to insure that no lasting or permanent damage shall be done to any public facility or
property.
1
Packet Page 95 of 203
1.3 City Fire Marshal shall inspect the facilities prior to the opening to the general
public on or before 10:00 a.m., August 10, 2007, as the parties shall agree and note all
potential problems. Prior to the opening of the event, Chamber shall correct all
problems. In the event that such problems are not corrected, City may at its sole
discretion cancel such event or prohibit the attendance of the general public in certain
areas, if in the opinion of the Fire Marshal and at the sole discretion of City, anything that
threatens life, health or property shall appear.
1.4 City shall provide barricades and barricade placement and removal for the
event.
1.5 City shall provide padlocks as required on location for tennis courts and other
areas for which public access is restricted during the Taste of Edmonds. City shall also
provide removal of the padlocks.
1.6 City shall provide water hookups adjacent to the Boys & Girls Club building for
use by the food vendors, Beer Garden and Wine Garden and shall provide hose bibs on
hydrants located at A and B on the site map attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by
this reference.
1.7 Portable grease traps shall be located on the site for use by food vendors in
accordance with City’s wastewater disposal policy. Grease traps or rendering barrels
shall be provided by Chamber. Chamber will assure that all washing occurs at
washstands.
1.8 City shall provide access to storage area of portable stage to beer garden at time
of stage installation and at time of stage removal.
1.9 City shall remove fencing on east side of Boys & Girls Club basketball courts.
1.10 City shall provide basketball hoop removal and re-installation on basketball
courts located near the Boys & Girls Club building.
1.11 City shall install Taste of Edmonds street banners as provided by Chamber at
approved sites. Chamber shall obtain a Street Banner Permit and pay the required fee.
1.12 City has the right to check the noise level of any amplified sound equipment or
other source and require that the volume be reduced if it exceeds the safety limits
recommended by the Seattle King County Department of Health or levels set forth in the
ordinances of the City of Edmonds.
1.13 City shall provide and oversee police supervision of the event under the
command of the Chief of Police or his designee. Police staffing levels and fees to be paid
to the City will be mutually determined by the Chief of Police, or his designee, and the
Taste Chairman.
2
Packet Page 96 of 203
2. Responsibilities and Rights of Chamber
2.1 The Chamber shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing commercial
general liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than
$1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal
injury, bodily injury and property damage. City shall be named as an additional insured
on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy and a copy of the endorsement
naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance.
The insurance policy shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to
each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the
limits of the insurer’s liability. The City shall be named as an insured on the Chamber’s
General Liability insurance policy. The insurance policy shall contain, or be endorsed to
contain that the Chamber’s insurance shall be the primary insurance. Any insurance, self
insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the
Chamber’s insurance and shall not contribute to it. The Chamber shall provide a
certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance before using the property
described herein. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating
of not less than A:VII.
2.2 Chamber shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers harmless from any claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits
including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this
Agreement, including actions or inactions of persons participating or providing services
in the event or from spectators, citizens, and other persons attending the events, except
for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of City.
2.3 Chamber may in its discretion limit the participation of any vendor in order to
adequately recognize limitations of space, failure to comply with applicable State or local
health, liquor, or other requirements of law, and in order to provide an adequate and
interesting diversity compatible with the recreation of the citizens of Edmonds.
2.4 Neither Chamber nor any officer, agent, or employee shall discriminate in the
provision of service under this contract against any individual, partnership, or corporation
based upon race, religion, sex, creed, place of origin, or any other form of discrimination
prohibited by federal, state or local law.
2.5 In addition, the parties acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of Initiative
901 as codified in Chapter 70.160 RCW (herein after the "smoking ban"), smoking is
prohibited in indoor areas, within 25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas
where public employees of the City, and employees of any vendor at the event or of the
contracting organization are required to be. This general description of the provisions of
the initiative is included for the purpose of reference and is not intended to expand or
contract the obligations created by the smoking ban. The Chamber warrants that it will
comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services and advice of the Snohomish
County Health District in assuring compliance during the event described in this
agreement.
3
Packet Page 97 of 203
2.6 Chamber shall obtain any necessary Street Use and Parks Facility Use Permits
and pay the required fees. (See site plan attached as Exhibit “A”).
2.7 Chamber shall restrict field parking to approved areas. Chamber shall have
security at permit parking entrance area to limit public access. City has the right to close
the parking area for the event if parking is not limited to the agreed upon area.
2.8 Chamber shall ensure that all booths/beer garden/wine garden have the
necessary state permits for serving and selling alcohol. Chamber agrees to make its best
effort to prevent service of alcohol to minors, including segregation of the beer garden
and wine garden, posting security at the entrances of the beer garden and wine garden
and checking identification in accordance with common practice. Chamber shall obtain
ASCAP and any other copyright licenses necessary.
2.9 Chamber agrees to the following general open hours of the Taste:
Friday, August 10, 2007: 11:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.
Saturday, August 11, 2007: 11:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.
Sunday, August 12, 2007: 11:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m.
Chamber agrees to keep the hours of operation in the Beer Garden and Wine
Garden within the following schedule:
Friday, August 10, 2007: 11 a.m.-10:00 p.m.
(Last call 9:30 p.m., no service after
9:45 p.m.)
Saturday, August 11, 2007: 11:00 a.m.-10 p.m.
(Last call 9:30 p.m., no service after
9:45 p.m.)
Sunday, August 12, 2007: 11:00 a.m.-7:00 p.m.
(Last call 6:30 p.m., no service after
6:45 p.m.)
2.10 Chamber shall provide any and all security services necessary during the night
time hours (night time hours being defined as those hours which the event is not in
operation), sufficient to reasonably secure the area and facilities provided. City shall
have no responsibility or liability for the provision of security services nor shall it be
liable for any loss or damage incurred by Chamber or the participants in this event.
2.11 Chamber shall provide a fire watch for all times in and around the booths and
displays open to the general public as a part of this event.
4
Packet Page 98 of 203
2.12 Chamber shall provide sufficient portable sani-cans and wash stations
(approximately 35 sani-cans, 2 of which are handicapped accessible, and 5 wash
stations).
2.13 Chamber shall provide fence installation and removal at the Beer Garden and
Wine Gardens.
2.14 Chamber shall provide for gravel and installation of gravel at the Beer Garden
and for removal and disposal of gravel or alternate design.
2.15 Chamber is responsible for contracting with appropriate vendors for power. No
power is available from the Civic Center complex.
2.16 Chamber shall provide labor and equipment for the portable Beer Garden stage
to: (1) pickup the stage elements at the City’s storage location, (2) set up the stage, (3)
take down the stage, (4) cleanup the stage elements, and (5) return the stage elements to
the City’s storage location.
2.17 Garbage service shall be contracted and paid for by Chamber.
2.18 Upon the completion of the event, Chamber shall make adequate provisions for
the cleanup and restoration of all sites rented or provided under the terms of this
agreement, including steam cleaning and pressure washing whenever required for all hard
surfaces impacted by the event. Storm drains are to be covered with filter fabric to
capture grease and debris.
2.19 Cleanup areas include area as described in paragraph 1.1 and all streets
immediately surrounding the event perimeter.
2.20 All garbage to the size of a cigarette butt, debris, litter, equipment, and any
other and all other items made necessary by or used in the provision of this event shall be
picked up and removed by 12:00 noon, August 14, 2007.
2.21 A final inspection of the event area shall be conducted by City Parks
Maintenance Division to determine if all areas are clean and returned to their original
condition.
2.22 Chamber shall submit a cleaning/damage deposit of $1,500.00 to City prior to
July 30, 2007. The deposit shall be refunded to Chamber if, upon inspection, all is in
order, or a prorated portion thereof as may be necessary to reimburse City for loss or
cleaning costs.
2.23 Chamber shall pay City all permit fees for the above-mentioned facility use
($576.00 facility rental) and services at least ten (10) days prior to the event, and shall
reimburse City for the actual costs of supplies or services furnished by City, unless
otherwise established, within thirty (30) days of mailing of a final bill by the City.
5
Packet Page 99 of 203
2.24 Colored banners or flags may not be placed in the existing holes in the public
sidewalk designated for the American flag program.
3. Sole Agreement; Amendment
This written agreement shall be and is the sole understanding of the parties. No prior
oral written representation or understanding shall alter the terms of this contract unless
specifically incorporated by reference and attached hereto. All amendments to this
contract shall be in writing signed by both parties and made prior to the date, which they
purport to be effective.
DATED this ______ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY OF EDMONDS: GREATER EDMONDS
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE:
______________________________ ________________________________
Mayor Gary Haakenson Jan Vance, Executive Director
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
______________________________
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk
CITY ATTORNEY:
______________________________
W. Scott Snyder
6
Packet Page 100 of 203
2007 LAYOUT
7
Packet Page 101 of 203
AM-998 2.I.
Hot Autumn Nites Contract
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Renee McRae Time:Consent
Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract with the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
for Hot Autumn Nites.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the Mayor to sign the Hot Autumn Nites contract.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The major change to this year's contract is the elimination of the dance and the beer garden.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 2007 Hot Autumn Nites
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 01:25 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/16/2007 06:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 08:30 AM APRV
Form Started By: Renee
McRae
Started On: 05/16/2007 09:58
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 102 of 203
CONTRACT
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
September 8, 2007
The following is an agreement between CITY OF EDMONDS (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as the "Chamber").
WHEREAS, the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce has proposed to hold a public event known as the
"Hot Autumn Nites!"; and
WHEREAS; the City Council finds that "Hot Autumn Nites!" provides distinct benefits to the City by
showcasing Edmonds while providing a unique recreational opportunity for its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such an event enhances tourism and promotes economic development
as well as providing an opportunity for good clean fun to its citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE,
1. City and Chamber agree that:
1.1. City shall provide use of surfaces of
“Center Round” around the fountain in downtown Edmonds at 5th Avenue and Main Street,
Main Street from the East side of its intersection with 3rd Avenue to the West side of its intersection
with 6th Avenue,
4th Avenue S. from the South side of its intersection with Bell Street to the North side of its
intersection with Dayton Street, and again from the South side of its intersection with Dayton Street to
approximately 100 feet south down 4th Avenue,
5th Avenue, from the North side if its intersection with Walnut Street to the South side of its
intersection with the alley immediately South of the Edmonds Historical Museum at 118 5th Avenue
N.,
Dayton Street, from the West side of 5th Avenue to the East side of 4th Avenue,
the City Hall parking lot located immediately South of the City Hall building at 121 5th Avenue N.
This does not include the parking lot under City Hall reserved for off-site Market vendor parking.
for use by Chamber for the "Hot Autumn Nites!" event. The above areas shall be hereinafter referred to as
the “City-Provided Site.”
1.2. One or several days before the event, City shall place signs so as to clear the City-Provided Site of all
vehicles from 2:00 a.m. on the date of the event until 7:00 p.m. on the same day.
1.3. City shall provide barriers near the following 12 locations for street closures required to contain the
City-Provided Site described in Paragraph 1.1:
Maple and 5th, to close Maple Street east of 5th Avenue
Dayton and 6th, to allow local access only on Dayton between 6th Avenue & 5th Avenue
Dayton and 5th, to close 5th Avenue north and south of Dayton Street
Dayton and 5th, to close Dayton west of 5th Avenue
Dayton and 4th, to close Dayton east of 4th Avenue
Walnut and 5th, to close 5th Avenue north and south of Walnut Street
1
Packet Page 103 of 203
Museum Alley and 5th, to close 5th Avenue south of the alley
Main and 6th, to close Main Street west of 6th Avenue
Main and 3rd, to close Main Street east of 3rd Avenue
4th and Bell, to close 4th Avenue south of Bell Street
4th and Dayton to close 4th Avenue north and south of Dayton Street; and
On 4th, to close 4th Avenue 100 ft. immediately south of Dayton
1.4. City shall arrange for closure of 5th Avenue South at State Route 104 from 5:00 a.m. until 8:00 a.m. on
the date of show. Chamber will be responsible for paying the wages of the police officer to be
stationed at the closed intersection. This intersection will be closed to general traffic for this time
period to allow for the safe staging of the show vehicles. There will be a committee member at the
intersection with the police officer to designate which vehicles will be allowed to pass through the
barrier.
1.5. Above barriers shall be delivered so as to allow Chamber to position such barriers at 5:00 a.m. the day
of the event. The number of barriers left by City at each of the eight locations shall be sufficient to
provide adequate street closure. Chamber shall remove same barriers at 7:00 p.m. on the same day.
1.6. City shall also provide street closure barriers for the purpose described in Paragraph 1.7 near the
following intersections:
Maple Street and 6th Avenue, to close Maple west of 6th; and
Alder Street and 6th Avenue, to close Alder west of 6th.
1.7. Chamber shall position such barriers at 5:00 a.m. the day of the event so as to provide adequate street
closures and prevent traffic from 6th Avenue to turn onto Maple Street or Alder Street from 5:00 a.m.
until 9:00 a.m. Chamber shall remove such barriers at 9:00 a.m. on the same day.
1.8. On the day of the event, Chamber shall place traffic cones on the center-dividing line of 5th Avenue
between Walnut Street and Alder Street from 5:00 a.m. until 9:00 a.m.
1.9. Chamber shall obtain any necessary Street Use Permits and pay the required fees. Police, Fire, and
Public Works will meet with Chamber of Commerce officials to resolve any remaining or potential
issues of traffic control and barricades prior to the event, but shall have no authority to waive the
requirements of city ordinance or state law.
1.10. All use and configuration of structures, booths and other temporary facilities used in the event shall be
inspected and reviewed by City Fire Chief, Police Chief, Building Official and Parks and Recreation
Director or their designees to determine whether the facilities in use comply with the provisions of
State and local law, as well as to insure that no lasting or permanent damage shall be done to any
public facility or property. City Fire Marshal shall inspect the facilities prior to the opening to the
general public on or before 7:00 a.m., September 8, 2007, as the parties shall agree and note all
potential problems. Prior to the opening of the event, Chamber shall correct all problems. In the event
that such problems are not corrected, City may at its sole discretion cancel such event or prohibit the
attendance of the general public in certain areas, if in the opinion of the Fire Marshal and at the sole
discretion of City, anything that threatens life, health or property shall appear.
1.11. City has the right to check the noise level of any amplified sound equipment or other source and
require that the volume be reduced if it exceeds the safety limits recommended by the Snohomish
County Department of Health or levels set forth in the ordinances of the City of Edmonds.
2. Chamber Responsibilities
In addition to the above and in consideration of the use of the facilities and services above described,
Chamber agrees that:
2
Packet Page 104 of 203
2.1. The Chamber shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing commercial general liability
insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. City
shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy and a
copy of the endorsement naming City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of
Insurance. The insurance policy shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to
each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the
insurer’s liability. The City shall be named as an insured on the Chamber’s General Liability
insurance policy. The insurance policy shall contain, or be endorsed to contain that the Chamber’s
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool
coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Chamber’s insurance and shall not contribute to
it. The Chamber shall provide a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance before
using the property described herein. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best
rating of not less than A:VII.
2.2. Chamber shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
harmless from any claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in
connection with the performance of this Agreement, including actions or inactions of persons
participating or providing services in the event or from spectators, citizens, and other persons
attending the events, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of City.
2.3. In addition, the parties acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of Initiative 901 as codified in
Chapter 70.160 RCW (herein after the "smoking ban"), smoking is prohibited in indoor areas, within
25 feet of vents or entrances and in outdoor areas where public employees of the City, and employees
of any vendor at the event or of the contracting organization are required to be. This general
description of the provisions of the initiative is included for the purpose of reference and is not
intended to expand or contract the obligations created by the smoking ban. The Chamber warrants that
it will comply with the smoking ban and will utilize the services and advice of the Snohomish County
Health District in assuring compliance during the event described in this agreement.
2.4. Chamber shall provide any and all security services necessary to reasonably secure the area and
facilities provided. City shall have no responsibility or liability for the provision of security services
nor shall it be liable for any loss or damage incurred by Chamber or the participants in this event.
2.5. Chamber shall provide a fire watch for all times in and around the booths and displays open to the
general public as a part of this event.
2.6. Chamber shall provide sufficient wash stations and approximately 12 sani-cans that may be placed on
site the night preceding the event. Garbage service, if necessary, shall be contracted and paid for by
Chamber.
2.7. Upon completion of the event, Chamber shall make adequate provisions for the cleanup of all sites
provided under the terms of this agreement so as to restore them to the same state of cleanliness as
observed the night prior to the event. Cleanup of all relevant street pavement shall be completed by
7:00 p.m. on that day. Cleanup of sidewalks shall be completed by 11:00 p.m. on that day. Cleanup
areas include the City-Provided Site as described in Section 1 and all streets immediately surrounding
the event perimeter, except for the site of the Summer Market. A final inspection of the event area
shall be conducted by a designated City official to determine if all areas are clean and returned to their
original condition.
2.8. Chamber shall pay City all permit fees for the above-mentioned facility use and services at least ten
(10) days prior to the event, and shall reimburse City for the actual costs of supplies or services
furnished by City (excluding those agreed to in Section 1) within thirty (30) days of mailing of a final
bill by the City, provided such supplies and services are approved and listed by all parties to this
3
Packet Page 105 of 203
Agreement in a signed addendum to this Agreement prior to the date which they purport to be
required.
2.9. Colored banners or flags may not be placed in the existing holes in the public sidewalk designated for
the American flag program.
3. Sole Agreement; Amendment
This written agreement shall be and is the sole understanding of the parties. No prior oral written
representation or understanding shall alter the terms of this contract unless specifically incorporated by
reference and attached hereto. All amendments to this contract shall be in writing signed by both parties
and made prior to the date, which they purport to be effective.
DATED this ______ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY OF EDMONDS: GREATER EDMONDS
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE:
______________________________ ________________________________
Mayor Gary Haakenson Jan Vance, Executive Director
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
______________________________
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk
CITY ATTORNEY:
______________________________
W. Scott Snyder
4
Packet Page 106 of 203
2007
5
Packet Page 107 of 203
6
Packet Page 108 of 203
AM-999 2.J.
Setting a Hearing Date Regarding Proposed Vacation of City Right-of-Way
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Resolution setting a hearing date regarding the proposed vacation of city right-of-way
adjacent to 17008 – 77th Place W. Applicant: Donald Willis; File No. ENG-07-124.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed resolution (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Per city code, a resolution is required to set a public hearing date to consider an application to
vacate city right-of-way. The required resolution is attached as Exhibit 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Resolution
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 02:37 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/16/2007 06:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 08:30 AM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 05/16/2007 01:38
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 109 of 203
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
5/14/07
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING
.DATE REGARDING THE PROPOSED VACATION OF A
PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO
17008 - 77TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON.
WHEREAS, Donald and Theresa Wills, the owners of certain real property
located at 17008 - 77th Place West, Edmonds, Washington have applied to vacate a portion of
the south ten feet of public right-of-way immediately north of said address and consisting of
unopened right-of-way of 77th Place West, designated for parking, landscaping and a turn-
around; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to establish a public hearing in accordance
with the requirements of state law and Chapter 20.70 ECDC; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A public hearing to consider the proposed vacation of certain right-of-
way described as the south ten feet of 59 feet of public right-of-way immediately north of Lot 7,
Charlotte Gardens except for the east 34 feet of 77th Place West and addressed as 17008 - 77th
Place West in Edmonds, Washington, is hereby set for July 17, 2007. The hearing date is not
more than sixty nor less than twenty days after the date of passage of this resolution.
RESOLVED this ___ day of ________________, 2007.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON
{WSS661481.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 110 of 203
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
{WSS661481.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 111 of 203
AM-991 2.K.
Proposed Ordinance Amending Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:Consent
Department:Development Services Type:
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the Edmonds Community
Development Code, Chapter 18.45 Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code , to incorporate the terms
"Improved" and "Partially Improved" in order to comply with recent decisions of the Washington
Supreme Court, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 18.45 of the ECDC.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
In February of 2007, the Washington State Supreme Court reviewed the City of Lacey’s
tree-clearing ordinance. Sleasman v. City of Lacey, 159 Wn. 2d 639 (Feb. 2007). The opinion
holds that the term “undeveloped” and “partially developed” do not refer to the construction of
buildings on a lot, but rather the process of development, i.e., creation of a legal lot. The holding
states:
We hold the Lacey ordinance does not apply to the Sleasmans’ property. The property is
developed because of the unlawful building site is already suited for sale or use. It is irrelevant that
the Sleasmans may further improve the property.
Sleasman at 641.
The Edmonds tree-clearing ordinance also uses the phrases “developed” and “partially developed.”
Unlike the City of Lacey, however, Edmonds defines its terms in a way which clearly refer to the
construction of buildings on a lot in order for it to be developed. Given the Supreme Court’s
definition of the terms, The City Attorney has suggested that we avoid future trouble and use the
terms “improved” and “unimproved” in the ordinance. Exhibit 1 is a draft ordinance highlighting
the proposed changes. Exhibit 2 is a proposed ordinance making those changes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Hightlighted Changes Draft Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Proposed Ordinance
Packet Page 112 of 203
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/15/2007 10:57 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/15/2007 09:03 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/16/2007 01:25 PM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 05/15/2007 09:39
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/16/2007
Packet Page 113 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
5/1/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.45 LAND CLEARING
AND TREE CUTTING CODE TO INCORPORATE THE
TERMS “IMPROVED” AND “PARTIALLY IMPROVED” IN
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH RECENT DECISIONS OF THE
WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, in a recent decision, the Washington State Supreme Court has haled
that the terms “developed” and “partially developed” to refer to the process of platting and
development, and not to the process of construction; and
WHEREAS, this decision was rendered in the context of the tree clearing code of
the City of Lacey; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds utilizes such terms in its land clearing and tree
cutting code; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds defines such terms to clearly address the
situations in which they are applicable, and
WHEREAS, however, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to
conform the language of the City Code and its definitions to generally accepted usage in the
State; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Packet Page 114 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.45 Land
Clearing and Tree Cutting Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.45
LAND CLEARING AND TREE CUTTING CODE
Sections:
18.45.000 Purposes.
18.45.010 Administering authority.
18.45.020 Permits.
18.45.030 Exemptions.
18.45.035 Procedural exemption.
18.45.040 Definitions.
18.45.045 Application requirements.
18.45.050 Performance standards for land development
permits.
18.45.055 Notice.
18.45.060 Appeals.
18.45.065 Bonding.
18.45.070 Violations and penalties.
18.45.075 Public and private redress.
18.45.080 Additional remedies authorized.
18.45.000 Purposes.
This chapter provides regulations for the clearing of and the
protection and preservation of trees and associated significant
vegetation for the following purposes:
A. To promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of
the citizens of Edmonds by preserving the physical and aesthetic
character of the city through the prevention of indiscriminate
removal or destruction of trees and ground cover on improved or
partially improved property;
B. To implement the policies of the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 as revised in 1984;
C. To implement and further the goals and policies of the
city's comprehensive plan in regard to the environment, open
space, wildlife habitat, vegetation, resources, surface drainage,
watershed, and economics;
Deleted: undeveloped
Deleted: developed
Packet Page 115 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
D. To ensure prompt development, restoration and replanting
and effective erosion control of property during and after land
clearing;
E. To promote land development practices that result in a
minimal adverse disturbance to existing vegetation and soils within
the city;
F. To minimize surface water and ground water runoff and
diversion;
G. To aid in the stabilization of soil, and to minimize erosion
and sedimentation;
H. To minimize the need for additional storm drainage
facilities caused by the destabilization of soils;
I. To retain clusters of trees for the abatement of noise and for
wind protection;
J. To acknowledge that trees and ground cover reduce air
pollution by producing pure oxygen from carbon dioxide;
K. To preserve and enhance wildlife and habitat including
streams, riparian corridors, wetlands and groves of trees;
L. To promote building and site planning practices that are
consistent with the city's natural topographic and vegetation
features while recognizing that certain factors such as condition
(e.g., disease, danger of falling, etc.), proximity to existing and
proposed structures and improvement, interference with utility
services, and the realization of a reasonable enjoyment of property
may require the removal of certain trees and ground cover;
M. To promote the reasonable improvement and development
of land in the city of Edmonds.
18.45.010 Administering authority.
The city's planning division manager or his/her duly authorized
representative is hereby authorized and directed to enforce all the
provisions of this chapter.
18.45.020 Permits.
No person shall engage in or cause any land to be cleared without
first obtaining a land clearing permit from the planning division
manager or his/her designee.
Packet Page 116 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
18.45.030 Exemptions.
The following shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter:
A. Clearing on an improved single-family lot or clearing on a
partially improved single-family lot, which is capable of being
divided into one additional lot, except for:
1. That portion of the lot that is located in a designated
environmentally sensitive area;
2. That portion of the lot that is located within 25 feet of any
stream or wetland;
3. That portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent;
B. Unimproved lots which are not capable of being further
subdivided, except for:
1. That portion of the lot that is located in a designated
environmentally sensitive area;
2. That portion of the lot that is located within 25 feet of any
stream or wetland;
3. That portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent;
C. Routine landscape maintenance and gardening;
D. Removal of trees and/or ground cover by the public works
department, parks department, fire department and/or public or
private utility in situations involving danger to life or property,
substantial fire hazards, or interruption of services provided by a
utility;
E. Installation and maintenance of public utilities, after
approval of the route by the planning division manager or his or
her designee, except in parks or environmentally sensitive areas;
F. Emergency situations on private property involving danger
to life or property or substantial fire hazards. [Ord. 3507 § 1,
2004].
18.45.035 Procedural exemption.
Projects requiring the approval of the Edmonds architectural
design board (“ADB”) under the provisions of Chapter 20.10
Deleted: a developed
Deleted: developed
Deleted: Undeveloped
Packet Page 117 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 -
ECDC shall be exempt from the application and procedural
requirements of this chapter; provided, however, that:
A. Clearing on such projects shall take place only after ADB
approval and shall be in accordance with such approval. Violations
shall be subject to the remedies prescribed by this chapter. See
ECDC 18.45.070.
B. ADB review of clearing proposals shall be consistent with
and apply to the standards established by this chapter. [Ord. 3507
§ 2, 2004].
18.45.040 Definitions.
A. “Caliper” shall mean the diameter of any tree trunk as
measured at a height of four feet above the ground on the upslope
side of the tree.
B. “Creek” means those areas where surface waters flow
sufficiently to produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel
or bed is indicated by hydraulically sorted sediments or the
removal of vegetative litter or loosely rooted vegetation by the
action of moving water. The channel or bed need not contain water
year around. This definition is not meant to include storm water
runoff devices or other entirely artificial watercourses unless they
are used to store and/or convey pass-through stream flows
naturally occurring prior to construction.
C. “Clearing” means the act of cutting and/or removing
vegetation. This definition shall include grubbing vegetation.
D. “Clearing permit” means the written approval of the city of
Edmonds planning division manager or his or her designee to
proceed with the act of clearing property within the city limits of
Edmonds.
E. “Improved lot” shall mean a lot or parcel of land upon
which a structure(s) is located, which cannot be more intensively
developed or improved pursuant to the city zoning code, and which
cannot be further subdivided pursuant to city subdivision
regulations.
F. “Drip line” of a tree shall be described by a line projected
to the ground delineating the outermost extent of foliage in all
directions.
G. “Grubbing” means the act of removing vegetation by the
roots.
Deleted: Developed
Packet Page 118 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 -
H. “Ground cover” shall mean a dense covering of small
plants such as salal, ivy, ferns, mosses, grasses, or other types of
vegetation which normally cover the ground.
I. “Land development permit” means a preliminary or final
plat for a single-family residential development; a building permit;
site plan; preliminary or final planned unit development plan.
J. “Lakes” are natural or artificial bodies of water of two or
more acres and/or where the deepest part of the basin at low water
exceeds two meters (6.6 feet). Artificial bodies of water with a
recirculation system approved by the public works department are
not included in this definition.
K. “Mechanical equipment” shall include all motorized
equipment used for earth moving, trenching, excavation,
gardening, landscaping, and general property maintenance
exceeding 12 horsepower in size.
L. “Native growth protection easement” is a restrictive area
where all native, predevelopment vegetation shall not be disturbed
or removed except for removal pursuant to an enhancement
program approved pursuant to this chapter or to remove dead or
diseased vegetation. The purpose of an easement is to protect steep
slopes, slopes with erosion potential, landslide and seismic
hazards, creeks, wetlands and/or riparian corridors, wildlife, and
areas shown on the environmentally sensitive areas map. This
easement shall be defined during the development review process
and shown on the recorded plat or short plat or approved site plan.
M. “Partially improved lot” shall mean a lot or parcel of land
upon which a structure (refer to ECDC 21.90.150) is located and
which is of sufficient area so as to be capable of accommodating
additional development or improvement pursuant to the Edmonds
zoning code; or which may be subdivided in accordance with the
city of Edmonds subdivision chapter.
N. “Person” shall mean any person, individual, public or
private corporation, firm, association, joint venture, partnership,
owner, lessee, tenant, or any other entity whatsoever or any
combination of such, jointly or severally.
O. “Removal” is the actual destruction or causing the effective
destruction through damaging, poisoning or other direct or indirect
actions resulting in the death of a tree or ground cover.
Deleted: developed
Packet Page 119 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 -
P. “Routine landscape maintenance” shall mean tree trimming
and ground cover management which is undertaken by a person in
connection with the normal maintenance and repair of property.
Q. “Tree” shall mean any living woody plant characterized by
one main stem or trunk and many branches and having a caliper of
six inches or greater, or a multi-stemmed trunk system with a
definitely formed crown.
R. “Unimproved lot” shall mean a platted lot or parcel of land
upon which no structure (refer to ECDC 21.90.150) exists.
S. “Wetlands” are those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient
to support and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated soil
conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and
similar area.
18.45.045 Application requirements.
A. An application for a land clearing permit shall be submitted
on a form provided by the city, together with a plot plan and other
information as described hereafter:
1. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant;
2. Legal status of applicant with respect to the land;
3. Written consent of owner(s) of the land, if the applicant is
not the sole owner;
4. Name of person preparing the map, drawing or diagram
submitted with the application, along with credentials if applicable;
5. Location of the property, including street number and
addresses, together with the names and addresses of all the
adjacent property owners within 80 feet of the subject property as
listed in the records of the Snohomish County assessor;
6. A plot plan, drawn to scale, of the property depicting the
following items (scale 1" = 30' or as approved by the planning
division manager):
a. Topographic information,
b. Location of all existing and/or proposed structures,
driveways, and utilities,
Deleted: Undeveloped
Packet Page 120 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 -
c. Areas proposed for clearing and the proposed use for such
area,
d. Designation of all diseased or damaged trees,
e. Any proposed grade changes that might adversely affect or
endanger trees on the property and specifications to maintain them.
f. Designation of trees to be removed and trees to be
maintained,
g. Designation of all wetlands, streams and environmentally
sensitive areas;
7. A statement outlining the purpose of the tree removal (e.g.,
building construction, street or roadway, driveway, recreation area,
patio, or parking lot), together with a proposed timetable for when
the work will occur;
8. The manner in which the cleared areas on the property will
be reclaimed with vegetation and the timetable for replanting;
9. Any other information deemed necessary by the city to
allow adequate review and implementation in conformance with
the purposes of this chapter.
B. Upon receipt of the application for a clearing permit, the
staff shall inspect the site and contiguous properties. If the staff
determines that the plan is in compliance with the provisions of
this section and will result in the removal of no more trees or
vegetation than is necessary to achieve the proposed development
or improvement, the permit shall be approved under the provisions
of ECDC 20.95.050 (Staff Decision – Optional Hearing).
The city may require a modification of the clearing plan or the
associated land development permit to ensure the retention of the
maximum number of trees.
If the staff determines that the plan will result in the destruction of
more trees and vegetation than is reasonably necessary to achieve
the proposed development, the permit shall be denied.
C. Any permit granted under the provisions of this section
shall expire one year from the date of issuance. No work may
commence on the permit until the appeal time limit has expired.
Upon receipt of a written request, a permit may be extended for six
months.
Deleted: plan
Packet Page 121 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 -
D. Approved plans shall not be amended without written
authorization from the city. The permit may be revoked or
suspended by the city upon discovery that incorrect information
was supplied or upon any violation of the provisions of this
chapter.
E. Applications for land clearing shall be referred to other city
departments or agencies for review and approval as deemed
necessary by the planning division manager. Applications for
clearing in parks shall always be referred to the Edmonds planning
board for review and approval.
18.45.050 Performance standards for land development
permits.
A. There shall be no clearing on a site for the sake of
preparing that site for sale or future development. Trees may only
be removed pursuant to a clearing permit which has been approved
by the city.
B. Trees shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible.
1. Clearing should not occur outside of the areas designated
on the clearing plan.
2. No tree(s) or ground cover shall be removed from a native
growth protection easement or environmentally sensitive site
unless that plot plan and other submitted materials can demonstrate
that the removal will enhance the easement area. An exception for
the installation of roads and utilities may be approved if it can be
demonstrated that alternative access is not practical or would be
more damaging and is developed pursuant to an approved
development plan.
Enhancement may include non-mechanical removal of noxious or
intrusive species or dead or diseased plants and replanting of
appropriate native species.
C. The city may restrict the timing of the land clearing and
tree cutting activities to specific dates, times, and/or seasons when
such restrictions are necessary for the public health, safety and
welfare, or for the protection of the environment.
D. Native growth protection easements may be established
through the subdivision process in the following areas:
Packet Page 122 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 -
1. A 25-foot buffer area from the annual high water mark of
creeks, streams, lakes and other shoreline areas or from top of the
bank of same, whichever provides good resource protection;
2. Areas in which the average slope is greater than 25 percent;
3. Wetlands;
4. Any other area which is determined through the
environmental review process to include significant vegetation,
wildlife or other similar resources which should be protected.
E. No ground cover or trees which are within 25 feet of the
annual high water mark of creeks, streams, lakes, and other
shoreline areas or within 15 feet of the top of the bank of same
should be removed, nor should any mechanical equipment operate
in such areas except for the development of public parks and trail
systems; provided that conditions deemed by the city to constitute
a public nuisance shall be removed, and provided that a property
owner shall not be prohibited from making landscaping
improvements where such improvements are consistent with the
aims of this chapter.
F. The city may require and/or allow the applicant to relocate
or replace trees, provide interim erosion control, hydroseed
exposed slopes, or use other similar methods which would comply
with the intent of the chapter.
G. No land clearing and tree cutting shall be conducted in a
wetland, except for the installation of roads and utilities where no
feasible alternative exists and the work is done pursuant to an
approved development plan.
H. When tree cutting or land clearing will occur pursuant to a
building, permit protection measures should apply for all trees
which are to be retained in areas immediately subject to
construction. The requirements listed may be modified individually
or severally by the city if the developer demonstrates them to be
inapplicable to the specific on-site conditions or if the intent of the
regulations will be implemented by another means with the same
result.
Where the drip line of a tree overlaps a construction line, this shall
be indicated on the survey and the following tree protection
measures shall be employed:
Packet Page 123 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 11 -
1. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any
equipment, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined
by the drip line of any tree to be retained.
2. The applicant shall erect and maintain rope barriers on the
drip line or place bales of hay to protect roots. In addition, the
applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks
are moving near trees.
3. If the grade level adjoining a retaining tree is to be raised or
lowered, the applicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well
around the tree. The diameter of this wall or well must be equal to
the tree's drip line.
4. The applicant may not install ground level impervious
surface material within the area defined by the drip line of any tree
to be retained.
5. The grade level around any tree to be retained may not be
lowered within the greater of the following areas: (1) the area
defined by the drip line of the tree, or (2) an area around the tree
equal to one foot in diameter for each one-inch of tree caliper.
6. The applicant may prune branches and roots, fertilize and
water as horticulturally appropriate for any trees and ground cover
which are to be retained.
The planning division manager or his/her designee may approve
the use of alternative tree protection techniques if those techniques
provide an equal or greater degree of protection than the
techniques listed above.
18.45.055 Notice.
The city shall mail a notice to the surrounding property owners,
pursuant to ECDC 20.90.010, informing them of the application
for a clearing permit.
18.45.060 Appeals.
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the staff regarding a
clearing permit may appeal such decision of the hearing examiner
within 10 working days of the date of the decision. The appeal
shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 20.105 ECDC.
Packet Page 124 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 -
18.45.065 Bonding.
The applicant shall post a performance bond in the amount
covering the installation of temporary erosion control measures
and the clearing work to be done on the property and the cost of
any proposed revegetation.
18.45.070 Violations and penalties.
A. A violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall
constitute a misdemeanor. It shall be a separate offense for each
and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any
of the provisions of this chapter is committed.
B. Any person found violating the provisions of this chapter
may be fined by the planning division manager in an amount not to
exceed $1,000 per day and/or $500.00 per tree. Any fine imposed
by the planning division manager is appealable to the hearing
examiner. This civil fine shall be in addition to any criminal, civil,
or injunctive remedy available to the city.
C. The fines established in subsection (C) of this section shall
be tripled to $3,000 per day and/or $1,500 per tree for clearing
which occurs within any critical area or critical area buffer, in any
earth subsidence or landslide hazard area, in any native growth
protection easement or in any area which is designated for transfer
or dedication to public use upon final approval of a subdivision,
planned residential development or other development permit.
[Ord. 3507 § 3, 2004].
18.45.075 Public and private redress.
A. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter or of
a permit issued pursuant hereto shall be liable for all damages to
public or private property arising from such violation, including
the cost of restoring the affected area to its original condition prior
to such violation and the payment of any levied fine.
1. Restoration shall include the replacement of all ground
cover with a species similar to those which were removed or other
approved species such that the biological and habitat values will be
substantially replaced; and
2. For each tree removed, replacement planting of up to three
trees of the same species in the immediate vicinity of the tree(s)
which was removed so long as adequate growing space is provided
for such species. The replacement trees shall be of sufficient
caliper to adequately replace the lost tree(s). Replacement trees
Packet Page 125 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 -
shall be a minimum of three inches in caliper and shall be replaced
at the direction of the planning division manager.
B. In order that replanted species shall have an opportunity to
adequately root and establish themselves prior to disturbance by
any future development, no permit shall be issued nor final
approval given to any project until such time as all planting
required to mitigate illegal activity has been fully implemented in
accordance with an approved landscaping plan, and an adequate
rooting period has expired. The plan shall meet the performance
standards established in ECDC 18.45.050. The phrase “adequate
rooting period” is defined for the purposes of this section as a
period of one calendar year from the date of planting; provided,
however, that a developer or other impacted party may apply to the
architectural design board for the establishment of a different
rooting period. The architectural design board shall establish such
period which may be longer or shorter than one calendar year
based upon the species of the plants involved, the particular point
in the growing cycle at which the application is reviewed, and the
planting schedule. The architectural design board shall establish a
rooting period based upon the best scientific and biological
evidence available as necessary to reasonably insure the
establishment of the plantings. In no event shall a rooting period be
established as a penalty.
C. Restoration shall also include installation and maintenance
of interim and emergency erosion control measures until such time
as the restored ground cover and trees reach sufficient maturation
to function in compliance via performance standards identified in
ECDC 18.45.050. [Ord. 2804 § 1, 1990].
18.45.080 Additional remedies authorized.
Violation of ECDC 18.45.035(A) or of any condition of ADB
approval regarding tree clearing, the protection of native growth or
landscaping installation and maintenance shall, in addition to
another remedy imposed by this code, be a violation of the
provisions of this chapter and subject to the bonding, violation and
penalty and public and private redress provisions of ECDC
18.45.065, et seq. [Ord. 3507 § 4, 2004].
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
Packet Page 126 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 14 -
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 127 of 203
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
- 15 -
Formatted: Left
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.45 LAND CLEARING
AND TREE CUTTING CODE TO INCORPORATE THE TERMS “IMPROVED” AND
“PARTIALLY IMPROVED” IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH RECENT DECISIONS OF
THE WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 128 of 203
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
5/1/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.45 LAND CLEARING
AND TREE CUTTING CODE TO INCORPORATE THE
TERMS “IMPROVED” AND “PARTIALLY IMPROVED” IN
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH RECENT DECISIONS OF THE
WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, in a recent decision, the Washington State Supreme Court has haled
that the terms “developed” and “partially developed” to refer to the process of platting and
development, and not to the process of construction; and
WHEREAS, this decision was rendered in the context of the tree clearing code of
the City of Lacey; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds utilizes such terms in its land clearing and tree
cutting code; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds defines such terms to clearly address the
situations in which they are applicable, and
WHEREAS, however, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to
conform the language of the City Code and its definitions to generally accepted usage in the
State; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 129 of 203
Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.45 Land
Clearing and Tree Cutting Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.45
LAND CLEARING AND TREE CUTTING CODE
Sections:
18.45.000 Purposes.
18.45.010 Administering authority.
18.45.020 Permits.
18.45.030 Exemptions.
18.45.035 Procedural exemption.
18.45.040 Definitions.
18.45.045 Application requirements.
18.45.050 Performance standards for land development
permits.
18.45.055 Notice.
18.45.060 Appeals.
18.45.065 Bonding.
18.45.070 Violations and penalties.
18.45.075 Public and private redress.
18.45.080 Additional remedies authorized.
18.45.000 Purposes.
This chapter provides regulations for the clearing of and the
protection and preservation of trees and associated significant
vegetation for the following purposes:
A. To promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of
the citizens of Edmonds by preserving the physical and aesthetic
character of the city through the prevention of indiscriminate
removal or destruction of trees and ground cover on improved or
partially improved property;
B. To implement the policies of the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 as revised in 1984;
C. To implement and further the goals and policies of the
city's comprehensive plan in regard to the environment, open
space, wildlife habitat, vegetation, resources, surface drainage,
watershed, and economics;
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 130 of 203
D. To ensure prompt development, restoration and replanting
and effective erosion control of property during and after land
clearing;
E. To promote land development practices that result in a
minimal adverse disturbance to existing vegetation and soils within
the city;
F. To minimize surface water and ground water runoff and
diversion;
G. To aid in the stabilization of soil, and to minimize erosion
and sedimentation;
H. To minimize the need for additional storm drainage
facilities caused by the destabilization of soils;
I. To retain clusters of trees for the abatement of noise and for
wind protection;
J. To acknowledge that trees and ground cover reduce air
pollution by producing pure oxygen from carbon dioxide;
K. To preserve and enhance wildlife and habitat including
streams, riparian corridors, wetlands and groves of trees;
L. To promote building and site planning practices that are
consistent with the city's natural topographic and vegetation
features while recognizing that certain factors such as condition
(e.g., disease, danger of falling, etc.), proximity to existing and
proposed structures and improvement, interference with utility
services, and the realization of a reasonable enjoyment of property
may require the removal of certain trees and ground cover;
M. To promote the reasonable improvement and development
of land in the city of Edmonds.
18.45.010 Administering authority.
The city's planning division manager or his/her duly authorized
representative is hereby authorized and directed to enforce all the
provisions of this chapter.
18.45.020 Permits.
No person shall engage in or cause any land to be cleared without
first obtaining a land clearing permit from the planning division
manager or his/her designee.
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 131 of 203
18.45.030 Exemptions.
The following shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter:
A. Clearing on an improved single-family lot or clearing on a
partially improved single-family lot, which is capable of being
divided into one additional lot, except for:
1. That portion of the lot that is located in a designated
environmentally sensitive area;
2. That portion of the lot that is located within 25 feet of any
stream or wetland;
3. That portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent;
B. Unimproved lots which are not capable of being further
subdivided, except for:
1. That portion of the lot that is located in a designated
environmentally sensitive area;
2. That portion of the lot that is located within 25 feet of any
stream or wetland;
3. That portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent;
C. Routine landscape maintenance and gardening;
D. Removal of trees and/or ground cover by the public works
department, parks department, fire department and/or public or
private utility in situations involving danger to life or property,
substantial fire hazards, or interruption of services provided by a
utility;
E. Installation and maintenance of public utilities, after
approval of the route by the planning division manager or his or
her designee, except in parks or environmentally sensitive areas;
F. Emergency situations on private property involving danger
to life or property or substantial fire hazards. [Ord. 3507 § 1,
2004].
18.45.035 Procedural exemption.
Projects requiring the approval of the Edmonds architectural
design board (“ADB”) under the provisions of Chapter 20.10
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
Packet Page 132 of 203
ECDC shall be exempt from the application and procedural
requirements of this chapter; provided, however, that:
A. Clearing on such projects shall take place only after ADB
approval and shall be in accordance with such approval. Violations
shall be subject to the remedies prescribed by this chapter. See
ECDC 18.45.070.
B. ADB review of clearing proposals shall be consistent with
and apply to the standards established by this chapter. [Ord. 3507
§ 2, 2004].
18.45.040 Definitions.
A. “Caliper” shall mean the diameter of any tree trunk as
measured at a height of four feet above the ground on the upslope
side of the tree.
B. “Creek” means those areas where surface waters flow
sufficiently to produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel
or bed is indicated by hydraulically sorted sediments or the
removal of vegetative litter or loosely rooted vegetation by the
action of moving water. The channel or bed need not contain water
year around. This definition is not meant to include storm water
runoff devices or other entirely artificial watercourses unless they
are used to store and/or convey pass-through stream flows
naturally occurring prior to construction.
C. “Clearing” means the act of cutting and/or removing
vegetation. This definition shall include grubbing vegetation.
D. “Clearing permit” means the written approval of the city of
Edmonds planning division manager or his or her designee to
proceed with the act of clearing property within the city limits of
Edmonds.
E. “Improved lot” shall mean a lot or parcel of land upon
which a structure(s) is located, which cannot be more intensively
developed or improved pursuant to the city zoning code, and which
cannot be further subdivided pursuant to city subdivision
regulations.
F. “Drip line” of a tree shall be described by a line projected
to the ground delineating the outermost extent of foliage in all
directions.
G. “Grubbing” means the act of removing vegetation by the
roots.
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 -
Packet Page 133 of 203
H. “Ground cover” shall mean a dense covering of small
plants such as salal, ivy, ferns, mosses, grasses, or other types of
vegetation which normally cover the ground.
I. “Land development permit” means a preliminary or final
plat for a single-family residential development; a building permit;
site plan; preliminary or final planned unit development plan.
J. “Lakes” are natural or artificial bodies of water of two or
more acres and/or where the deepest part of the basin at low water
exceeds two meters (6.6 feet). Artificial bodies of water with a
recirculation system approved by the public works department are
not included in this definition.
K. “Mechanical equipment” shall include all motorized
equipment used for earth moving, trenching, excavation,
gardening, landscaping, and general property maintenance
exceeding 12 horsepower in size.
L. “Native growth protection easement” is a restrictive area
where all native, predevelopment vegetation shall not be disturbed
or removed except for removal pursuant to an enhancement
program approved pursuant to this chapter or to remove dead or
diseased vegetation. The purpose of an easement is to protect steep
slopes, slopes with erosion potential, landslide and seismic
hazards, creeks, wetlands and/or riparian corridors, wildlife, and
areas shown on the environmentally sensitive areas map. This
easement shall be defined during the development review process
and shown on the recorded plat or short plat or approved site plan.
M. “Partially improved lot” shall mean a lot or parcel of land
upon which a structure (refer to ECDC 21.90.150) is located and
which is of sufficient area so as to be capable of accommodating
additional development or improvement pursuant to the Edmonds
zoning code; or which may be subdivided in accordance with the
city of Edmonds subdivision chapter.
N. “Person” shall mean any person, individual, public or
private corporation, firm, association, joint venture, partnership,
owner, lessee, tenant, or any other entity whatsoever or any
combination of such, jointly or severally.
O. “Removal” is the actual destruction or causing the effective
destruction through damaging, poisoning or other direct or indirect
actions resulting in the death of a tree or ground cover.
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 -
Packet Page 134 of 203
P. “Routine landscape maintenance” shall mean tree trimming
and ground cover management which is undertaken by a person in
connection with the normal maintenance and repair of property.
Q. “Tree” shall mean any living woody plant characterized by
one main stem or trunk and many branches and having a caliper of
six inches or greater, or a multi-stemmed trunk system with a
definitely formed crown.
R. “Unimproved lot” shall mean a platted lot or parcel of land
upon which no structure (refer to ECDC 21.90.150) exists.
S. “Wetlands” are those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient
to support and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated soil
conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and
similar area.
18.45.045 Application requirements.
A. An application for a land clearing permit shall be submitted
on a form provided by the city, together with a plot plan and other
information as described hereafter:
1. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant;
2. Legal status of applicant with respect to the land;
3. Written consent of owner(s) of the land, if the applicant is
not the sole owner;
4. Name of person preparing the map, drawing or diagram
submitted with the application, along with credentials if applicable;
5. Location of the property, including street number and
addresses, together with the names and addresses of all the
adjacent property owners within 80 feet of the subject property as
listed in the records of the Snohomish County assessor;
6. A plot plan, drawn to scale, of the property depicting the
following items (scale 1" = 30' or as approved by the planning
division manager):
a. Topographic information,
b. Location of all existing and/or proposed structures,
driveways, and utilities,
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 -
Packet Page 135 of 203
c. Areas proposed for clearing and the proposed use for such
area,
d. Designation of all diseased or damaged trees,
e. Any proposed grade changes that might adversely affect or
endanger trees on the property and specifications to maintain them.
f. Designation of trees to be removed and trees to be
maintained,
g. Designation of all wetlands, streams and environmentally
sensitive areas;
7. A statement outlining the purpose of the tree removal (e.g.,
building construction, street or roadway, driveway, recreation area,
patio, or parking lot), together with a proposed timetable for when
the work will occur;
8. The manner in which the cleared areas on the property will
be reclaimed with vegetation and the timetable for replanting;
9. Any other information deemed necessary by the city to
allow adequate review and implementation in conformance with
the purposes of this chapter.
B. Upon receipt of the application for a clearing permit, the
staff shall inspect the site and contiguous properties. If the staff
determines that the plan is in compliance with the provisions of
this section and will result in the removal of no more trees or
vegetation than is necessary to achieve the proposed development
or improvement, the permit shall be approved under the provisions
of ECDC 20.95.050 (Staff Decision – Optional Hearing).
The city may require a modification of the clearing plan or the
associated land development permit to ensure the retention of the
maximum number of trees.
If the staff determines that the plan will result in the destruction of
more trees and vegetation than is reasonably necessary to achieve
the proposed development, the permit shall be denied.
C. Any permit granted under the provisions of this section
shall expire one year from the date of issuance. No work may
commence on the permit until the appeal time limit has expired.
Upon receipt of a written request, a permit may be extended for six
months.
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 -
Packet Page 136 of 203
D. Approved plans shall not be amended without written
authorization from the city. The permit may be revoked or
suspended by the city upon discovery that incorrect information
was supplied or upon any violation of the provisions of this
chapter.
E. Applications for land clearing shall be referred to other city
departments or agencies for review and approval as deemed
necessary by the planning division manager. Applications for
clearing in parks shall always be referred to the Edmonds planning
board for review and approval.
18.45.050 Performance standards for land development
permits.
A. There shall be no clearing on a site for the sake of
preparing that site for sale or future development. Trees may only
be removed pursuant to a clearing permit which has been approved
by the city.
B. Trees shall be retained to the maximum extent feasible.
1. Clearing should not occur outside of the areas designated
on the clearing plan.
2. No tree(s) or ground cover shall be removed from a native
growth protection easement or environmentally sensitive site
unless that plot plan and other submitted materials can demonstrate
that the removal will enhance the easement area. An exception for
the installation of roads and utilities may be approved if it can be
demonstrated that alternative access is not practical or would be
more damaging and is developed pursuant to an approved
development plan.
Enhancement may include non-mechanical removal of noxious or
intrusive species or dead or diseased plants and replanting of
appropriate native species.
C. The city may restrict the timing of the land clearing and
tree cutting activities to specific dates, times, and/or seasons when
such restrictions are necessary for the public health, safety and
welfare, or for the protection of the environment.
D. Native growth protection easements may be established
through the subdivision process in the following areas:
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 -
Packet Page 137 of 203
1. A 25-foot buffer area from the annual high water mark of
creeks, streams, lakes and other shoreline areas or from top of the
bank of same, whichever provides good resource protection;
2. Areas in which the average slope is greater than 25 percent;
3. Wetlands;
4. Any other area which is determined through the
environmental review process to include significant vegetation,
wildlife or other similar resources which should be protected.
E. No ground cover or trees which are within 25 feet of the
annual high water mark of creeks, streams, lakes, and other
shoreline areas or within 15 feet of the top of the bank of same
should be removed, nor should any mechanical equipment operate
in such areas except for the development of public parks and trail
systems; provided that conditions deemed by the city to constitute
a public nuisance shall be removed, and provided that a property
owner shall not be prohibited from making landscaping
improvements where such improvements are consistent with the
aims of this chapter.
F. The city may require and/or allow the applicant to relocate
or replace trees, provide interim erosion control, hydroseed
exposed slopes, or use other similar methods which would comply
with the intent of the chapter.
G. No land clearing and tree cutting shall be conducted in a
wetland, except for the installation of roads and utilities where no
feasible alternative exists and the work is done pursuant to an
approved development plan.
H. When tree cutting or land clearing will occur pursuant to a
building, permit protection measures should apply for all trees
which are to be retained in areas immediately subject to
construction. The requirements listed may be modified individually
or severally by the city if the developer demonstrates them to be
inapplicable to the specific on-site conditions or if the intent of the
regulations will be implemented by another means with the same
result.
Where the drip line of a tree overlaps a construction line, this shall
be indicated on the survey and the following tree protection
measures shall be employed:
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 -
Packet Page 138 of 203
1. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any
equipment, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined
by the drip line of any tree to be retained.
2. The applicant shall erect and maintain rope barriers on the
drip line or place bales of hay to protect roots. In addition, the
applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks
are moving near trees.
3. If the grade level adjoining a retaining tree is to be raised or
lowered, the applicant shall construct a dry rock wall or rock well
around the tree. The diameter of this wall or well must be equal to
the tree's drip line.
4. The applicant may not install ground level impervious
surface material within the area defined by the drip line of any tree
to be retained.
5. The grade level around any tree to be retained may not be
lowered within the greater of the following areas: (1) the area
defined by the drip line of the tree, or (2) an area around the tree
equal to one foot in diameter for each one-inch of tree caliper.
6. The applicant may prune branches and roots, fertilize and
water as horticulturally appropriate for any trees and ground cover
which are to be retained.
The planning division manager or his/her designee may approve
the use of alternative tree protection techniques if those techniques
provide an equal or greater degree of protection than the
techniques listed above.
18.45.055 Notice.
The city shall mail a notice to the surrounding property owners,
pursuant to ECDC 20.90.010, informing them of the application
for a clearing permit.
18.45.060 Appeals.
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the staff regarding a
clearing permit may appeal such decision of the hearing examiner
within 10 working days of the date of the decision. The appeal
shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 20.105 ECDC.
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 11 -
Packet Page 139 of 203
18.45.065 Bonding.
The applicant shall post a performance bond in the amount
covering the installation of temporary erosion control measures
and the clearing work to be done on the property and the cost of
any proposed revegetation.
18.45.070 Violations and penalties.
A. A violation of any of the provisions of this chapter shall
constitute a misdemeanor. It shall be a separate offense for each
and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any
of the provisions of this chapter is committed.
B. Any person found violating the provisions of this chapter
may be fined by the planning division manager in an amount not to
exceed $1,000 per day and/or $500.00 per tree. Any fine imposed
by the planning division manager is appealable to the hearing
examiner. This civil fine shall be in addition to any criminal, civil,
or injunctive remedy available to the city.
C. The fines established in subsection (C) of this section shall
be tripled to $3,000 per day and/or $1,500 per tree for clearing
which occurs within any critical area or critical area buffer, in any
earth subsidence or landslide hazard area, in any native growth
protection easement or in any area which is designated for transfer
or dedication to public use upon final approval of a subdivision,
planned residential development or other development permit.
[Ord. 3507 § 3, 2004].
18.45.075 Public and private redress.
A. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter or of
a permit issued pursuant hereto shall be liable for all damages to
public or private property arising from such violation, including
the cost of restoring the affected area to its original condition prior
to such violation and the payment of any levied fine.
1. Restoration shall include the replacement of all ground
cover with a species similar to those which were removed or other
approved species such that the biological and habitat values will be
substantially replaced; and
2. For each tree removed, replacement planting of up to three
trees of the same species in the immediate vicinity of the tree(s)
which was removed so long as adequate growing space is provided
for such species. The replacement trees shall be of sufficient
caliper to adequately replace the lost tree(s). Replacement trees
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 -
Packet Page 140 of 203
shall be a minimum of three inches in caliper and shall be replaced
at the direction of the planning division manager.
B. In order that replanted species shall have an opportunity to
adequately root and establish themselves prior to disturbance by
any future development, no permit shall be issued nor final
approval given to any project until such time as all planting
required to mitigate illegal activity has been fully implemented in
accordance with an approved landscaping plan, and an adequate
rooting period has expired. The plan shall meet the performance
standards established in ECDC 18.45.050. The phrase “adequate
rooting period” is defined for the purposes of this section as a
period of one calendar year from the date of planting; provided,
however, that a developer or other impacted party may apply to the
architectural design board for the establishment of a different
rooting period. The architectural design board shall establish such
period which may be longer or shorter than one calendar year
based upon the species of the plants involved, the particular point
in the growing cycle at which the application is reviewed, and the
planting schedule. The architectural design board shall establish a
rooting period based upon the best scientific and biological
evidence available as necessary to reasonably insure the
establishment of the plantings. In no event shall a rooting period be
established as a penalty.
C. Restoration shall also include installation and maintenance
of interim and emergency erosion control measures until such time
as the restored ground cover and trees reach sufficient maturation
to function in compliance via performance standards identified in
ECDC 18.45.050. [Ord. 2804 § 1, 1990].
18.45.080 Additional remedies authorized.
Violation of ECDC 18.45.035(A) or of any condition of ADB
approval regarding tree clearing, the protection of native growth or
landscaping installation and maintenance shall, in addition to
another remedy imposed by this code, be a violation of the
provisions of this chapter and subject to the bonding, violation and
penalty and public and private redress provisions of ECDC
18.45.065, et seq. [Ord. 3507 § 4, 2004].
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 -
Packet Page 141 of 203
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 14 -
Packet Page 142 of 203
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.45 LAND CLEARING
AND TREE CUTTING CODE TO INCORPORATE THE TERMS “IMPROVED” AND
“PARTIALLY IMPROVED” IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH RECENT DECISIONS OF
THE WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS660356.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
- 15 -
Packet Page 143 of 203
AM-976 2.L.
Public Works Week Proclamation
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Kim Karas
Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:Consent
Department:Public Works Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of Public Works Week, May 20 - 26, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the proclamation be signed designating the week of May 20th through May
26th 2007 Public Works Week.
Previous Council Action
Previously the proclamation was signed designating one week in May, Public Works Week for the
past 17 years.
Narrative
The week of May 20th through 26th, 2007 has been designated as National Public Works Week.
This week is intended to promote public awareness and understanding of the Public Works field
and to recognize the accomplishments of Public Works employees. In the City of Edmonds, the
public works field includes the following divisions: Street/Storm, Water/Sewer, Facilities, Fleet,
Parks, and the Wastewater Treatment Plant. In addition, the Engineering division of the
Development Services Department serves as an integral part of the Public Works services for the
City of Edmonds. On Thursday, May 24th, a joint Public Works luncheon with the Lynnwood and
Mountlake Terrace Public Works group will be held at Lynndale Park at 18900 72nd Ave. W. in
Lynnwood. This will be the twelfth year of the event. The event is an opportunity for staff to share
experiences and ideas on Public Works issues and for Mayors and Directors to recognize staff for
their skills and contribution to the community. This year the event is being hosted by the
Lynnwood Public Works Department and the cost is $6.00 per person. The public is welcome to
attend, and please call the Public Works office at 425.771.0235 for reservations.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Public Works Week Proclamation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 11:22 AM APRV
Packet Page 144 of 203
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/17/2007 02:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:56 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kim
Karas
Started On: 05/03/2007 10:47
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 145 of 203
Packet Page 146 of 203
AM-1002 3.
Presentation on "Everything Edmonds"
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:20 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce presentation on "Everything Edmonds."
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The following representatives of the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce will be present to
provide information on the website Everything Edmonds:
Jan Vance, Executive Director
Mike Denton, Membership and Communications Manager
Chris Moss, Web Designer
A copy of the Power Point Presentation is attached.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Everything Edmonds Presentation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 11:22 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/17/2007 02:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:57 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/17/2007 11:16
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 147 of 203
1907 - 2007
Packet Page 148 of 203
4th of July Parade and Fireworks
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 149 of 203
4th of July Parade and Fireworks
A Taste of Edmonds
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 150 of 203
4th of July Parade and Fireworks
A Taste of Edmonds
Hot Autumn Nites
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 151 of 203
4th of July Parade and Fireworks
A Taste of Edmonds
Hot Autumn Nites
Halloween Downtown
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 152 of 203
4th of July Parade and Fireworks
A Taste of Edmonds
Hot Autumn Nites
Halloween Downtown
Christmas Tree Lighting
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 153 of 203
4th of July Parade and Fireworks
A Taste of Edmonds
Hot Autumn Nites
Halloween Downtown
Christmas Tree Lighting
Third Thursday Artwalk
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 154 of 203
Marketing
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 155 of 203
Marketing
Networking
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 156 of 203
Marketing
Networking
Events
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 157 of 203
Marketing
Networking
Events
Member Benefits
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 158 of 203
Marketing
Networking
Events
Member Benefits
Education
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 159 of 203
Marketing
Networking
Events
Member Benefits
Education
Information
the friendliest town on puget sound greater
edmonds chamber of commerce
Packet Page 160 of 203
What else can
the Chamber
do for
Edmonds?
Packet Page 161 of 203
What can
Edmonds do
for Edmonds?
Packet Page 162 of 203
EverythingEdmonds.com
This will be
rotating
photos
of Edmonds
Packet Page 163 of 203
The website is designed to be the The website is designed to be the
one site for information about one site for information about
ALLALL
Edmonds businesses, Edmonds businesses,
Packet Page 164 of 203
The website is designed to be the The website is designed to be the
one site for information about one site for information about
ALLALL
Edmonds businesses, calendars of Edmonds businesses, calendars of
events, events,
Packet Page 165 of 203
The website is designed to be the The website is designed to be the
one site for information about one site for information about
ALLALL
Edmonds businesses, calendars of Edmonds businesses, calendars of
events, recreational programs, events, recreational programs,
Packet Page 166 of 203
The website is designed to be the The website is designed to be the
one site for information about one site for information about
ALLALL
Edmonds businesses, calendars of Edmonds businesses, calendars of
events, recreational programs, events, recreational programs,
entertainment, entertainment,
Packet Page 167 of 203
The website is designed to be the The website is designed to be the
one site for information about one site for information about
ALLALL
Edmonds businesses, calendars of Edmonds businesses, calendars of
events, recreational programs, events, recreational programs,
entertainment, and links to other entertainment, and links to other
important Edmonds Web sites.important Edmonds Web sites.
Packet Page 168 of 203
Packet Page 169 of 203
Put your money where Put your money where
your House is…your House is…
Packet Page 170 of 203
Each licensed business in Edmonds will be Each licensed business in Edmonds will be
included in a searchable database on the new included in a searchable database on the new
Web Site. Web Site.
1900
Packet Page 171 of 203
•Website Feedback •Member Login
All rights reserved
Business owners will be able to update their Business owners will be able to update their
business information and add their events for free business information and add their events for free
to the database by going to the site and following to the database by going to the site and following
directions. directions.
Packet Page 172 of 203
There will also be areas to enhance and add specific There will also be areas to enhance and add specific
products or services for a minimal fee. products or services for a minimal fee.
Packet Page 173 of 203
Additional WebAdditional Web --based services will be based services will be
available to available to allall businesses; businesses;
regardless of Chamber affiliation.regardless of Chamber affiliation.
Revenues from enhanced listings and advertising Revenues from enhanced listings and advertising
will be used to market and maintain the site.will be used to market and maintain the site.
Packet Page 174 of 203
Why Patronize Local Business?Why Patronize Local Business?
¾To promote a strong vital local economy. For every
$100 spent in Edmonds, $68 remains in the
community! That is 37% more than with National
chain stores.
Packet Page 175 of 203
Why Patronize Local Business?Why Patronize Local Business?
¾To promote a strong vital local economy. For every
$100 spent in Edmonds, $68 remains in the
community! That is 37% more than with National
chain stores.
¾To support and enhance our unique neighborhoods
Packet Page 176 of 203
Why Patronize Local Business?Why Patronize Local Business?
¾To promote a strong vital local economy. For every
$100 spent in Edmonds, $68 remains in the
community! That is 37% more than with National
chain stores.
¾To support and enhance our unique neighborhoods
¾To create more quality jobs
Packet Page 177 of 203
Why Patronize Local Business?Why Patronize Local Business?
¾To promote a strong vital local economy. For every
$100 spent in Edmonds, $68 remains in the
community! That is 37% more than with National
chain stores.
¾To support and enhance our unique neighborhoods
¾To create more quality jobs
¾To encourage local prosperity
Buy Local -- Support yourself
Packet Page 178 of 203
Think Local…
Buy Local…
Energize Edmonds!
Each time you patronize any Edmonds business, you enhance our coEach time you patronize any Edmonds business, you enhance our co mmunity.mmunity.
Packet Page 179 of 203
“The Chamber has long
taken the lead in marketing
Edmonds and Edmonds
businesses to the world.
Everything Edmonds is
the next logical step for the
Chamber and Edmonds.”
David Stern
Packet Page 180 of 203
To find out more about this cutting edge local
marketing program and what else it includes:
Email Everything@EdmondsWA.com
Call 425-670-1496 Extension 3
Packet Page 181 of 203
Why does the
Chamber feel it needs
to be at the forefront
of this effort?
Packet Page 182 of 203
The Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce mission:
To promote the economic
vitality of the greater
Edmonds business
community through advocacy,
leadership, and education.
Packet Page 183 of 203
AM-994 4.
Historic Preservation Commission - Downtown Design Standards
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:05/22/2007
Submitted By:Rob Chave Time:45 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report and recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission on downtown
design standards.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Provide direction to the Planning Board and Historic Preservation Commission.
Previous Council Action
The Historic Preservation Commission reported to the City Council on February 27, 2007 (see
minutes in Exhibit 2).
Narrative
This discussion is a follow-up to the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission's report to the
City Council on February 27, 2007. Since that meeting, the EHPC has worked to develop a set of
recommendations and design guidelines that could be implemented in the downtown BD1 zone
(recommended to be named the "Heritage Center of Edmonds"). The Commission is asking the
Council to forward its recommendations to the Planning Board, and allow the EHPC to work with
the Planning Board in developing a final set of code amendments for Council consideration
and adoption. The intent is to arrive at a set of development code amendments that would ensure
that new and redeveloped structures in the BD1 zone represent the historic character of downtown.
As code amendments, the proposals would require public hearings at both the Planning Board and
City Council levels.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: EHPC Recommendation
Link: Exhibit 2: City Council minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 11:22 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/17/2007 02:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:57 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob Started On: 05/15/2007 02:57
Packet Page 184 of 203
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 05/15/2007 02:57
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 185 of 203
RECOMMENDATIONS BY
THE EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ON DESIGN REVIEW FOR THE DOWNTOWN BD1 ZONE
(THE “HERITAGE CENTER OF EDMONDS”)
PURPOSE
The purpose of establishing the Heritage Center of Edmonds (the area currently
zoned BD1) is to preserve and continue the historic architectural character of this
area. Establishing Historic Design Standards for new and renovated structures
in this area will help promote and support a vibrant retail environment in the
center of the downtown core. Approved Historic Design Standards will provide a
foundation for all future development in the Heritage Center of Edmonds (BD1)
and a mechanism to involve members of the Historic Preservation Commission in
the design review process. The Heritage Center of Edmonds will promote
economic vitality by increasing property values and encouraging heritage
tourism.
In support of this purpose, the Commission requests that the City Council forward these
recommendations to the Planning Board, and that the Commission be allowed to work
with the Planning Board to develop a final set of code amendments for City Council
consideration.
The Commission’s RECOMMENDATIONS are summarized below, by subject.
RENAME THE BD1 ZONE
The BD1 zone be renamed the “Heritage Center of Edmonds.”
DEVELOP DESIGN STANDARDS
City Council to direct the EHPC and the Planning Board to work together in an iterative
process to further develop design standards for the Heritage Center of Edmonds. As a
starting point, the attached “Design Guidelines for Building Design” should be
considered for use as design standards in the Heritage Center of Edmonds.
THRESHOLD FOR DESIGN REVIEW
Because of the importance of the public streetscape in the Heritage Center of Edmonds,
SEPA shall not be the sole standard triggering the ADB’s hearing process. Instead, any
project which has the potential to have a significant impact on the pedestrian streetscape
shall undergo full ADB review. Threshold details should be worked out by the Planning
Board in consultation with the EHPC.
EHPC Recommendation/2007.05.10 Page 1
Packet Page 186 of 203
DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission shall have two of its members serve as
voting members of the ADB for applications within the Heritage Center of Edmonds
(BD1).
APPLICATIONS FOR ADB REVIEW
For projects requiring ADB review within the Heritage Center of Edmonds:
• The applicant shall provide a brief description of the project and the surrounding
streetscape (neighboring buildings, setbacks, heights and rooflines).
• The applicant shall provide blueprints to include plan, elevation and section
drawings. Include window design, signs and exterior lighting.
• Detailed drawings or 3-dimensional model of new/altered architectural features and
trim are required.
• Applicant shall provide a description and samples of building materials including
types of windows, roofing and siding. (Applicant must include an actual color chart
or color samples.)
• Photographs of nearby building facades, rooflines and streetscape will be required. If
a historic rehabilitation or alteration, photos from Historic Preservation Commission
would be helpful.
DEMOLITION
Demolition permits may not be issued for up to sixty days while the Edmonds Historic
Preservation Commission works with the applicant to explore alternatives to
demolition.
INCENTIVES
Create incentives to preserve existing structures. These might include: the waiving or
reducing of permit fees, the expediting of permit approvals, and a relaxing of building
standards to allow the ability to go outside the existing building’s envelope to promote
preservation of buildings which are on the Edmonds Register Of Historical Places.
EHPC PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS
Historic Preservation Commission requests the City Council to direct the Planning
Board to incorporate the Historic Preservation Commission in the process of developing
these concepts with Planning Board.
EHPC Recommendation/2007.05.10 Page 2
Packet Page 187 of 203
Design Guidelines
for Building Design
Packet Page 188 of 203
Massing and Articulation
Buildings should convey a distinct base and top.
Intent:
To reduce the massiveness and
bulk of large box-like buildings,
and articulate the building form to
a pedestrian scale.
Guidelines:
1. Buildings shall convey a visually
distinct ‘base’ and ‘top’. A ‘base’
can be emphasized by a different
masonry pattern, more
architectural detail, visible ‘plinth’
above which the wall rises,
storefront, canopies, or a
combination. The top edge is
highlighted by a prominent
cornice, projecting parapet or
other architectural element that
creates a shadow line.
The base can be emphasized by a different
material.
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 2
Packet Page 189 of 203
Orientation to Street
Buildings shall be oriented to the street.
Intent:
To reinforce pedestrian activity
and orientation and enhance the
liveliness of the street through
building design.
Guidelines:
1. Buildings shall be oriented to the
adjacent street, rather than to a
parking lot.
2. Entrances to buildings shall be
visible from the street and
accessible from the adjacent
sidewalk.
3. Entrances shall be given a visually
distinct architectural expression by
two or more of the following
elements:
Entrances shall be given visually
distinct expression.
a. Higher bay(s)
b. Recessed entry (recessed at
least 3 feet)
c. Forecourt
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 3
Packet Page 190 of 203
Ground Level Details
Intent:
To reinforce the character of the
streetscape by encouraging the
greatest amount of visual interest
along the ground level of buildings
facing pedestrian streets.
Guidelines:
1. Ground-floor, street-facing façades
of commercial and mixed-use
buildings shall incorporate at least
five of the following elements.
a. Lighting or hanging baskets
supported by ornamental
brackets
b. Medallions
c. Belt courses
d. Plinths for columns
Ground floor details encourage visual interest along
the ground level of buildings facing pedestrian
streets.
e. Kickplate for storefront window
f. Projecting sills
g. Tilework
h. Transom or clerestory windows
i. Planter box
j. An element not listed here, as
approved, that meets the
intent.
k. Blade or projecting signs which
include decorative frames,
brackets or other design
elements (see section on
‘awnings and signage’).
2. Ground floor commercial space
shall be at grade with the
sidewalk. Sunken entrances are
prohibited.
3. Ground floor residential units
should be separated from the
sidewalk either by setbacks or by
elevation (e.g. raised above street
grade) in order to afford privacy to
residents.
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 4
Packet Page 191 of 203
Awnings and Signage
Intent:
To integrate signage and weather
protection with building design to
enhance business visibility and the
public streetscape.
Open-sided non-structural awning
with front valance.
To provide clear signage to identify
each business or property, and to
improve way-finding for visitors.
To protect the streetscape from
becoming cluttered, and to
minimize distraction from overuse
of advertisement elements.
Guidelines:
1. Awnings are encouraged along
pedestrian street fronts. Awnings
may be structural (permanently
attached to and part of the
building) or non-structural
(attached to the building using a
metal or other framework).
Open-sided structural awning.
2. Awnings shall be open-sided to
enhance visibility of business
signage. Front valances are
permitted. Signage is allowed on
valances, but not on valance
returns.
3. Marquee, box, or convex awning
shapes are not permitted.
4. Retractable awnings are
encouraged.
5. Awnings shall be located within
the building elements that frame
storefronts, and should not
conceal important architectural
details. Awnings should be hung
just below a clerestory or
“transom” window, if it exists.
6. Awnings on a multiple-storefront
building should be consistent in
character, scale and position, but
need not be identical.
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 5
Packet Page 192 of 203
Awnings and Signage
(continued)
Retractable and open-sided awnings
allow signage to be visible.
7. Non-structural awnings should be
constructed using canvas or fire-
resistant acrylic materials. Shiny,
high-gloss materials are not
appropriate; therefore, vinyl or
plastic awning materials are not
permitted.
8. Signage should be designed to
integrate with the building and
street front. Combinations of sign
types are encouraged which result
in a coordinated design while
minimizing the size of individual
signs.
Awning
Shapes:
Standard
Convex
Box
Marquee
9. Blade or projecting signs which
include decorative frames,
brackets or other design elements
are encouraged. This type of detail
can be used to satisfy one of the
required elements under the
section ‘Ground Level Details.’
Examples of projecting signs
using decorative frames and
design elements.
10. Use graphics or symbols to reduce
the need to have large expanses of
lettering.
11. Signage in the “Arts Center
Corridor” defined in the
Comprehensive Plan is required to
include decorative sign frames or
brackets in its design.
12. Instead of broadly lighting the face
of the sign, signage should be
indirectly lit, or backlit to only
display lettering and symbols or
graphic design.
13. Signage should be given special
consideration when it is consistent
with or contributes to the historic
character of sites on the National
Register or the Edmonds Register
of Historic Places
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 6
Packet Page 193 of 203
Transparency at Street Level
Intent:
To provide visual connection
between activities inside and
outside the building.
Ground level facades of buildings should
have transparent windows between
2 to 10 feet above grade.
Guidelines:
1. The ground level façades of
buildings that are oriented to
streets shall have transparent
windows between an average of 2
feet and 10 feet above grade,
according to the following:
a. Retail Core: minimum of 75%
transparency
b. Other Areas: minimum of 30%
transparency
2. To qualify as transparent, windows
shall not be mirrored or darkly
tinted glass, or prohibit visibility
between the street and interior.
Windows shall provide a visual
connection between activities inside and
outside the building, and therefore
should not be mirrored or use darkly
tinted glass.
3. Where transparency is not
provided, the façade shall comply
with the guidelines under the
section ‘Treating Blank Walls’.
4. All-residential buildings do not
have a specific transparency
requirement. However, all-
residential buildings shall be
treated as if they have blank walls
facing the street and must comply
with the guidelines under the
section ‘Treating Blank Walls’.
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 7
Packet Page 194 of 203
Treating Blank Walls
Intent:
To ensure that buildings do not
display blank, unattractive walls to
the abutting street.
Guidelines:
1. Walls or portions of walls on
abutting streets or visible from
residential areas where windows
are not provided shall have
architectural treatment (see
guidelines under section
‘Transparency’). At least four of the
following elements shall be
incorporated into any ground floor,
street-facing façade:
a. Masonry (except for flat
concrete block)
Buildings shall not display blank,
unattractive walls to the abutting street.
b. Concrete or masonry plinth at
the base of the wall
c. Belt courses of a different
texture and color
d. Projecting cornice
e. Projecting metal canopy
f. Decorative tilework
g. Trellis containing planting
h. Medallions
i. Opaque or translucent glass
j. Artwork or wall graphics
k. Vertical articulation
l. Lighting fixtures
m. An architectural element not
listed above, as approved, that
meets the intent.
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 8
Packet Page 195 of 203
Treating Blank Walls
(continued)
2. For buildings having residential
units on the ground floor,
landscaping — including hanging
baskets or planter boxes — and
other street-level façade
enhancements shall be required to
integrate the building with the
streetscape. This requirement is
considered to satisfy one of the
four elements required in (1)
above.
Building Rooftop Equipment
Intent:
To ensure that HVAC equipment,
elevators, and other rooftop
features are designed to be a part
of the overall building design and
do not detract from the
streetscape.
Rooftop equipment should be
screened from view.
Guidelines:
1. Rooftop HVAC equipment,
elevators and other rooftop
features should be designed to fit
in with the materials and colors of
the overall building design. These
features should be located away
from the building edges to avoid
their being seen from the street
below. Building design should use
screening, decoration, plantings
(e.g. rooftop gardens), or other
techniques to integrate these
features with the design of the
building.
Draft Downtown Design Guidelines/2006.12.28 Page 9
Packet Page 196 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
February 27, 2007
Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. to interview an Arts Commission candidate, the Edmonds City
Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th
Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director
Kathleen Junglov, Asst. Admin. Services Dir.
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Don Sims, Traffic Engineer
Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 20, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #94366 THROUGH #94503 FOR FEBRUARY 22, 2007
IN THE AMOUNT OF $517,224.00. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS
AND CHECKS #44519 THROUGH #44565 FOR THE PERIOD OF FEBRUARY 1
THROUGH FEBRUARY 15, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $766,144.76.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM DARROL HAUG
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED).
3. CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF GREG BANASEK TO THE ARTS
COMMISSION.
Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin introduced Greg Banasek and described his background.
Approve
2/20/07
Minutes
Approve
Claim Checks
Claim for
Damages
Arts
Commission
Appointment
Packet Page 197 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 2
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
CONFIRM THE APPOINTMENT OF GREG BANASEK TO THE ARTS COMMISSION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Banasek thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve on the Arts Commission. Mayor
Haakenson thanked him for volunteering to serve.
4. 2007 LIMITED OBLIGATION BOND SALE.
Administrative Services Director Dan Clements introduced the City’s Financial Advisor Allen Dashen, A.
Dashen & Associates. Mr. Dashen displayed a graph of interest rate trends for the past year and since
1987, commenting interest rates had not been this low since the pre-President Nixon days. He reviewed a
list of purposes for the $5,230,000 bond sale, noting only a small amount was General Fund moneys with
most paid by utilities and other sources.
Mr. Dashen explained the City applied for a rating on the City’s bonds from Moody’s Investors Service
who confirmed the City’s A1 rating on Limited Tax Bonds and confirmed the AA3 rating for voted
bonds. He noted this placed the City’s rate in the top tier of cities in Washington State. He relayed
comments made by Moody’s including strong tax base appreciation in affluent community just north of
Seattle; City’s financial operations are well managed, benefiting from a combination of spending
practices and healthy revenue growth; and favorable comments about fund balances.
Mr. Dashen explained the bonds were structured to be “bank qualified” which results in a lower interest
rate to the City, approximately 4% lower. The bonds mature over 20 years and were sold through a
competitive bid process with firms nationwide bidding on the City’s bonds. The City received 11 bids;
PNC Capital Markets was the winning bidder. He displayed a list of bidders, noting 2-3 were within
.01% of each other. He reviewed the source and uses of the funds, advising the net from the sale was
$5,205,734. He recommended approval of the sale resolution.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1142. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The resolution
reads as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING THE BID OF
PNC CAPITAL MARKETS LLC FOR $5,230,000 PAR VALUE LIMITED TAX GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS, 2007, OF THE CITY; FIXING THE INTEREST RATES AND
MATURITY SCHEDULE ON THOSE BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS
PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.
5. ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION.
Historic Preservation Commissioners Steven Waite, Rob Van Tassell, Norma Bruns, Christine Deiner-
Karr, and Barbara Kindness introduced themselves. (Commissioners Brian Hall and Deborah Binder were
absent.)
Commissioner Kindness advised the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) meets the second Tuesday
of each month in the Fourtner Room of City Hall. She advised the meetings were open to the public and
they encourage attendance and participation from interested citizens. Councilmember Plunkett is the
Council liaison on the Commission and staff assistance is provided by Rob Chave and Diane
Cunningham.
Commissioner Kindness invited the Chair of each of the Commission’s four subcommittees to report on
their activities. Commissioner Van Tassell reported the Planning Committee’s recent efforts focused on
2007 Limited
Obligation
Bond Sale
Historic
Preservation
Commission
Packet Page 198 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 3
the downtown core, which they called the heritage neighborhood area, and providing guidance for design
with regard to historic preservation. Their efforts resulted in a draft document that had been circulated to
the Council’s Community Services/Development Services committee and the public. The next step
would be to share the draft with the Planning Board and the City Attorney before presenting it to the
Council for codification. The Planning Committee also developed the Commission’s Strategic Plan.
Commissioner Kindness advised Commissioner Waite, Chair of the Incentives Committee, also
developed the walking tour. Commissioner Waite explained one of the challenges for the Incentives
Committee was convincing building owners to retain their structures as they had the right to demolish
their structure. He noted buildings on the Historic Register were community assets and part of a
collection of structures and sites that created Edmonds’ image. Incentives for structures on the Historic
Register could include an expedited permit process or a reduction in permit fees. The Committee has also
been reviewing the International Existing Building Code which has been adopted in other cities.
Commissioner Waite described the walking tour attended by Councilmembers, ADB and Planning Board
Members, staff and the public to look at existing buildings in the City and point out architectural
characteristics that define the City. He offered to conduct another tour in the spring. He advised there
were buildings in the community that represent each decade from 1890.
Commissioner Deiner-Karr, Chair of the Registration Committee, referred to a list of applications for
registration that have been submitted. She explained five private property applications were submitted in
2006; one of the properties, the August Johnson House, which has been reviewed and approved by the
HPC and the Planning Board, would be presented to the Council for approval in the near future. In
addition, ten properties that are already on the State Historical Register have submitted applications as
part of the expedited process for registering properties on the State and National Registers. The
Commission hopes to have these properties through the registration process by the end of the first quarter
in 2007. Once these properties were approved, she advised plaques would be installed on the properties.
Commissioner Kindness advised 83 properties in the downtown core met the criteria for historic
preservation. Once these initial properties were approved, the Commission planned to encourage other
property owners to apply for designation.
Commissioner Bruns reported the primary purpose of the Community Outreach and Education
Committee was to educate the public about the existence of the HPC as well as its mission and purpose.
Deborah Binder, a member of the committee, raised over $4,000 to produce the walking tour brochure
that highlights 27 historic and architectural sites in the downtown core. The brochure has been well
received and is available at local Snohomish County tourist information offices. Work has begun on a
companion brochure that will help Edmonds residents understand why and how to register their
properties. This brochure is funded by a grant from the Washington State Historic Preservation Office.
Commissioner Bruns advised the committee organized a day at the Edmonds Summer Market where they
connected with residents and distributed brochures. They plan to do this again in 2007. The committee
also wrote several articles in the local newspaper about the HPC’s work. Commissioner Bruns advised
she is the representative from the Edmonds South Snohomish County Historic Society. She suggested a
joint meeting to address the difference between the museum’s activities and the HPC’s activities.
Councilmember Moore asked the difference between the Edmonds South Snohomish County Historic
Society and the HPC. Commissioner Bruns explained the Historic Society operates the museum and may
put up plaques. She summarized the Historic Society’s focus was sites versus individual residences. She
relayed the Historic Society planned to fund a plaque for Holmes Corner. Commissioner Waite
commented the Historic Society was a repository of information, items and photographs versus the HPC
Packet Page 199 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 4
which was a City Commission charged with placing buildings and sites on the Edmonds Historic
Register. He assured a property added to the Edmonds Historic Register could be easily removed from
the register; however, being on the register could provide certain benefits via local government.
For Councilmember Moore, Commissioner Waite described benefits of being on the Edmonds Historic
Register which include freezing the value of any improvements for ten years. There are also tax credits
available from being on the National Register. He explained being on the Edmonds Historic Register was
an honorarium that illustrated the property owners’ interest in historic preservation and may increase the
structure’s value.
Councilmember Moore asked whether the 83 structures that met the Commission’s criteria were all in the
downtown core. Commissioner Kindness advised they were. Commissioner Waite noted these included
commercial buildings as well. Commissioner Kindness advised the advisory board identified over 1000
properties that were over 50 years old. The survey only detailed the downtown area and identified 83
properties. Commissioner Deiner-Karr advised the 83 properties also included structures less than 50
years old that were architecturally unique. She noted there were also properties for which an application
had been submitted that were not on the list but research found they had historically unique character.
Councilmember Moore asked whether the owners of the 83 properties had been notified their property
was identified on the survey. Commissioner Deiner-Karr advised some had been contacted; a notification
strategy was being considered.
Councilmember Plunkett recognized Historic Preservation Commissioners for their specific efforts and
thanked the Council for providing the funds for the survey of downtown properties and funds for plaques.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Conceptual Design
Standards for possible Heritage Neighborhood provided by the Historic Preservation Commission,
advising these were design standards, not guidelines as the intent was to codify the standards for the BD1
zone so that new construction or renovation was required to meet historic standards. He noted the design
standards were the result of the work of Mark Hinshaw as well as Rob Chave.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the comment in the Planning report that the next step in the process
was to share the draft with the Planning Board, expressing concern with the possibility of forwarding the
draft to the Planning Board before the Council approved the concept. Commissioner Van Tassell
commented the intent of the presentation to the Community Services/Development Services Committee
was to obtain input from the Council. He urged the Council to provide additional feedback.
Councilmember Plunkett preferred the Council approve the concept before the draft was forwarded to the
Planning Board. Commissioner Waite envisioned workshops with the Planning Board as well as input
from the public.
Councilmember Marin recalled the draft was presented to the Community Services/Development Services
Committee and after further review, he was prepared to provide feedback. He was satisfied with
forwarding the Design Guidelines for Building Design (pages 5-14) to the Planning Board immediately.
Recognizing the need for incentives to encourage property owners to register their properties, he
suggested the next priority for the Commission be to finalize a recommendation on incentives, present it
to the Community Services/Development Services Committee, then to the Council and then to the
Planning Board. He was uncomfortable with the first four pages of the draft code language. Due to the
shift of the ADB review to the beginning of the process, he was not comfortable with having two Historic
Preservation Commissioners be voting members on the ADB but did not object to two Commissioners
serving in an advisory role on the ADB.
Packet Page 200 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 5
With regard to the language requiring HPC review of demolition applications, Councilmember Marin
noted this review was too late in the process. He preferred property owners be encouraged to preserve
their buildings via incentives for registry. He was satisfied with the language regarding dimensions.
Councilmember Plunkett asked staff to speak to design guidelines versus design standards. Planning
Manager Rob Chave recalled the Commission’s feeling was that these items were important enough that
all buildings in the downtown core should respond to them and therefore were more appropriate as
standards in the code. He agreed with the suggestion for Historic Preservation Commissioners to advise
the ADB, noting the logistics would need to be worked out. Mr. Chave advised the demolition standards
required further review by the City Attorney which could be accomplished during the Planning Board’s
review. He noted the draft was primarily a HPC product and had not had a detailed review by staff.
For Councilmember Plunkett, Mr. Chave advised the entire document could be forwarded to the Planning
Board for review or forward only pages 5-14 and after further refinement, forward pages 1-4.
Councilmember Wambolt was comfortable with forwarding the design standards developed by Mr.
Hinshaw and refined by Mr. Chave to the Planning Board, suggesting the document prepared by ACE
accompany the design standards.
Council President Olson suggested as ACE was not a City organization, the information prepared by ACE
could be provided to the Planning Board for their deliberations. Councilmember Wambolt agreed as long
as the Planning Board reviewed the information.
Councilmember Plunkett was reluctant for the Council to forward the ACE document as well as the first
four pages of the discussion document to avoid the appearance that the Council was endorsing it in
concept. He noted ACE or any other individual or group could submit information to the Planning Board.
He supported forwarding the Historic Design Standards to the Planning Board. Councilmember Marin
agreed the ACE material should not accompany the design standards and suggested ACE provide the
material to the Planning Board.
Councilmember Moore asked what happened if the Council did not act on the design standards tonight.
Commissioner Van Tassell answered forwarding one without the other would be out of context. He
preferred the documents be forwarded to the Planning Board together as one document.
Councilmember Orvis inquired about the provision to relocate a historic building. Commissioner Van
Tassell answered the August Johnson House was an example of an opportunity for a house to be moved
to an appropriate location and remain on the registry. Councilmember Orvis asked if the building could
be moved outside the Heritage Neighborhood. Commissioner Van Tassell answered yes, which would
allow construction of a new building on the site.
Councilmember Orvis asked whether dimensional waivers would be addressed by grandfathering.
Commissioner Van Tassell answered a house that was out of compliance may be required to be brought
into compliance when improvements were made. Commissioner Waite advised the City Attorney was
drafting verbiage regarding non-compliance. He advised this provision would allow improvements to a
structure without penalty.
Councilmember Orvis agreed there appeared to be issues on the first four pages that needed to be
addressed. He preferred the members representing the HPC on the ADB be voting members. He
recommended withholding the dimensional section to ensure historic issues were mitigated. He preferred
the Council address these issues before forwarding them to the Planning Board but was comfortable
forwarding the design standards section to the Planning Board.
Packet Page 201 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 6
Councilmember Plunkett observed the design standards on pages 5-14 were code and pages 1-4 were
policy. The Planning Board could begin reviewing the design standards while the Council discussed the
policy issues further. He preferred the Council discuss the policy issues further before forwarding them
to the Planning Board.
Councilmember Moore noted the usual process was for the Planning Board to do this preliminary work
and gather public input. She preferred the entire document be forwarded to the Planning Board at once.
Councilmember Wambolt understood from the HPC that the first four pages were a work in progress and
the Commission needed to answer the questions posed in the document before the Council could
deliberate on it. Commissioner Van Tassell commented the intent of tonight’s meeting was not to discuss
the document but rather to present the HPC's work.
For Councilmember Moore, Mr. Chave explained the design guidelines developed by the ADB were more
general in nature and addressed many areas in the City; the HPC's design standards were tailored to a
specific district. He recalled the intent was as design standards for individual neighborhoods/districts
were developed, the ADB’s review would occur at the beginning of the process. The new design review
process that would be presented to the Council next month included an up-front design review and
identification of which areas it would apply to. The draft identified the Hwy. 99 CG zones as well as
downtown. That could also include these design standards for a portion of downtown.
Councilmember Moore asked if the HPC was comfortable with the entire document. Commissioner Van
Tassell stated there were still many questions to be answered in the draft discussion document.
Councilmember Marin suggested adding “BD1” and “preserve and mimic historic architectural design
elements and provide a mechanism to participate in the review of proposed projects” to the first paragraph
of the Purpose section. He explained the intent was to encourage the preservation of buildings with
historical architectural significance and if the owner was not interested in preserving the building, require
that they mimic the architectural features of a good downtown. Whether that isolated a period of 1890 to
1930 was not as important because the elements identified in design standards that made a good
downtown in 1930 also made a good downtown retail core today and in the future. With the addition, he
supported forwarding the purpose section to the Planning Board to provide context for the design
standards.
Council President Olson asked when the Planning Board could begin reviewing the design standards. Mr.
Chave answered the Planning Board would begin their review when the Council referred it. Council
President Olson was concerned with slowing the process. Mr. Chave asked whether the Council wanted
the HPC to do further refinement and return it to the Council or forward it to the Planning Board.
Councilmember Moore commented the intent was always for the Arts Corridor to be different from the
downtown zones. She suggested consideration be given to how the design standards would apply to the
Arts Corridor, acknowledging it may require coordination with the Arts Commission.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
FORWARD TO THE PLANNING BOARD THE HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS WITH THE
PURPOSE PREAMBLE AS AMENDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN.
Councilmember Moore advised she would not support the motion as the HPC requested more time to
work on the document.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the portion the HPC wanted to work on was the discussion
document; the Commission and Mr. Chave were comfortable with forwarding the historic design
standards to the Planning Board.
Packet Page 202 of 203
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 27, 2007
Page 7
Commissioners agreed with forwarding the design standards to the Planning Board with revised purpose
statement, noting the remainder of the draft discussion document was still under construction.
Mayor Haakenson was concerned the Planning Board would review the design standards and then later
receive the discussion/policy portion of the document. Councilmember Plunkett pointed out the Planning
Board could begin their review of the design standards, noting there were still policy issues to be
resolved. He was concerned with forwarding the policy issues to the Planning Board before the Council
had reached a consensus on those concepts.
Councilmember Moore preferred to complete both documents before forwarding them to the Planning
Board. The Planning Board had many other items they were working on. Mayor Haakenson advised the
Planning Board had recently prioritized their schedule for the next five months. Commissioner Kindness
advised the subcommittee could complete the first four pages at their next meeting.
Councilmember Plunkett commented his concern was it had taken three months to get to this point and
was concerned there would be further delay. He was frustrated with the pace and with the number of
unanswered questions on the first four pages. If the policy portion could be returned to the Council
within a month, he was comfortable with forwarding the entire document to the Planning Board at one
time.
Councilmember Orvis observed there were two different documents, design standards and
implementation, and did not think they necessarily needed to be forwarded to the Planning Board at the
same time.
Councilmember Moore and Council President Olson supported allowing the HPC additional time to
complete their work and forward both parts to the Planning Board at one time. Councilmember Marin
was anxious to move forward but was willing to allow the HPC more time.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF
THE SECOND.
Councilmember Plunkett clarified his expectation was the HPC’s review would be completed in 30 days
and if not, he wanted the design standards to be forwarded to the Planning Board.
Councilmembers discussed whether to forward the document to the Planning Board or return it to the City
Council to resolve the policy issues and agreed the HPC would return to the full Council with the intent of
reviewing and forwarding the document to the Planning Board that night.
6. PRESENTATION OF HIGHWAY 99 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND SAFETY STUDY
REPORT. THE HIGHWAY 99 TASK FORCE WILL ALSO BRIEF COUNCIL ON POTENTIAL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS UNDER STUDY.
Councilmember Marin advised the intent of the Hwy. 99 Taskforce’s work was to provide synergy and
momentum to attract projects to the Hwy. 99 corridor that would enhance the neighborhood and the City
in general.
Traffic Engineer Don Sims explained there were 35,000 vehicle trips per day in the Hwy. 99 corridor,
predicted to increase to 50,000 vehicle trips per day in the next 20 years. He advised it was a challenging
corridor for pedestrians and was extensively used by transit.
Mr. Sims introduced Dan Hansen, Perteet Engineering, who reviewed the project development process
which included review of existing conditions, identification of deficiencies, technical workshops,
development of alternatives, evaluation of alternatives and final recommendations. He reviewed project
Hwy 99
Traffic
Circulation
and Safety
Study
Packet Page 203 of 203