HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007.06.05 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
June 5, 2007
6:30 p.m. - Executive Session Regarding a Legal Matter
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1.Approval of Agenda
2.Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B.AM-1007
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of May 22, 2007.
C.AM-1005
Approval of claim checks #96460 through #96614 for May 24, 2007 in the amount of $440,499.08 and #96615
through #96751 for May 31, 2007 in the amount of $234,953.60.
D.AM-1004
Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Cliff Sanderlin (amount undetermined), and Philip Laue
(amount undetermined).
E.AM-1001
Authorization to proceed with selection of a consultant to design the Shell Valley Emergency Access and
preliminary short subdivision.
F.AM-1016
Draft Guidelines - Candidate Forums and Use of City Facilities.
G.AM-1013
Proposed Ordinance vacating certain unopened right-of-way of 8th Avenue North, north of Sprague Street,
and reserving an easement.
H.AM-1009
Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds City Code, Section 4.50.040 Fees - Disbursements,
paragraph (D), relating to the registration of Licensed Massage Therapists.
3.AM-950
(15 Min)
2006 Annual Report from the Edmonds Sister City Commission.
4.AM-1014
(20 Min)
Presentation regarding proposed 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway and 162nd Street SW
Park.
5.AM-1012
(10 Min)
Closed Record Review on the rezone from Single-Family Residential (RS-6) to Office Residential (OR)
for properties located on the west side of Sunset Ave. N. and south of Bell St. This is an administrative
rezone initiated by the City of Edmonds to bring the zoning of these properties into conformity with the
Comprehensive Plan. (File No. R-07-14).
6.AM-1006
(20 Min)
Public hearing on the adoption of the 2006 International Building, Fire and Supplemental Code.
7.AM-1008
(45 Min)
Public Hearing - Consideration of a Development Agreement under RCW 36.70B.170 to provide vesting
to certain real property located at 201 5th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington (Old Milltown). The
agreement covers lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 37, 38, 39 and 40, including both Old Milltown and the adjacent site.
8.AM-1017 Approval of Settlement Agreement - Gregg Productions, Inc. v. City of Edmonds; contingent on
Packet Page 1 of 302
8.AM-1017
(15 Min)
Approval of Settlement Agreement - Gregg Productions, Inc. v. City of Edmonds; contingent on
approval of Agenda Item 7.
9.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)
10.AM-1011
(20 Min)
Report of bids opened on May 8, 2007 for the 164th Street SW Walkway and the 74th Place West
Drainage Improvements projects and award of contract to Trimaxx Construction, Inc. ($545,565.00).
11.(5 Min)Mayor's Comments
12.(15 Min)Council Comments
13.Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 302
AM-1007 2.B.
Approve City Council Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of May 22, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the Draft May 22, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 05-22-07 Draft Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 09:18 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/29/2007 11:37 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 01:27 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/29/2007 09:15
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/29/2007
Packet Page 3 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
May 22, 2007
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember*
(*Participated by phone for Agenda Item 4)
ALSO PRESENT
Shaun Callahan, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Renee McRae, Recreation Manager
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 15, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #96295 THROUGH #96459 FOR MAY 17, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $379,290.90. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND
CHECKS #44830 THROUGH #44895 FOR THE PERIOD OF MAY 1 THROUGH MAY
15, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $790,967.90.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM NATALIA SEDYKH
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED).
E. REPORT OF BIDS OPENED ON MAY 8, 2007 FOR THE 2007 STREET OVERLAY
PROGRAM AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO WILDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
($859,815.30).
Packet Page 4 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 2
F. REPORT OF BIDS OPENED ON MAY 10, 2007 FOR THE OLD WOODWAY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DEMOLITION PROJECT AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO
R.W. RHINE, INC.($344,605.34).
G. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE 4TH OF JULY
PARADE AND FIREWORKS DISPLAY.
H. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE TASTE OF EDMONDS.
I. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR HOT AUTUMN NITES.
J. RESOLUTION NO. 1146 SETTING A HEARING DATE REGARDING THE PROPOSED
VACATION OF CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 17008 – 77TH PLACE W.
APPLICANT: DONALD WILLIS; FILE NO. ENG-07-124.
K. ORDINANCE NO. 3646 OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 18.45 LAND
CLEARING AND TREE CUTTING CODE, TO INCORPORATE THE TERMS
"IMPROVED" AND "PARTIALLY IMPROVED" IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
RECENT DECISIONS OF THE WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
L. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF PUBLIC WORKS WEEK, MAY 20 - 26, 2007.
3. GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESENTATION ON "EVERYTHING
EDMONDS."
Jim Hills, President, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, commented the Chamber joined the
family and friends and everyone touched by his energy and vision in mourning the passing of Police
Chief and Chamber President David Stern. He shared Chief Stern’s enthusiasm for the community and
was here to introduce a new website launched today, EverythingEdmonds.com.
Mr. Hills remarked Edmonds was a special place and getting that message to the community had taken a
number of forms over the years including the Edmonds Kind of Day bumper sticker and the more recent
marketing efforts by Team Edmonds. As it became clear that the Team Edmonds had run its course,
Chamber members began discussing a number of methods of getting the message out including how the
Internet could be used. Following months of research, the Chamber Board voted to move ahead with
EverthingEdmonds.com funded entirely by Chamber resources but available to all businesses.
Jan Vance, Executive Director, commented it had been a broad-based process to develop the “think and
look local” program that allowed anyone to find any business in Edmonds regardless of whether they
were Chamber members, find out what’s happening, helpful links and a site that would generate its own
budget. She identified the members of the Chamber Economic Development Committee and the
members of the subcommittee who developed the EverythingEdmonds program. She expressed her
thanks to all Chamber Board Members for their support.
Mike Denton, Membership and Communications Manager, remarked the Greater Edmonds Chamber
of Commerce has served the community for over 100 years. He identified events the Chamber has been
involved in:
Packet Page 5 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 3
• 4th of July parade and fireworks (100th anniversary this year).
• Taste of Edmonds (25th anniversary this year)
• Hot Autumn Nites Car Show (7th anniversary this year)
• Halloween downtown
• Christmas Tree Lighting & Santa Parade
• Third Tuesday Artwalk
Mr. Denton listed the services the Chamber provides its members including marketing, networking
opportunities, events, education, and a variety of other benefits. He explained the EverythingEdmonds
website was designed to be one site for information about all Edmonds businesses, calendar of events,
recreation programs, entertainment, links to other important Edmonds websites, and a space for special
offers from Edmonds merchants. He explained this campaign was an effort to get Edmonds residents to
put their money where their house is.
He explained on the EverythingEdmonds website, each licensed business in Edmonds would be included
in a searchable database. Business owners have the ability to update their information, add events to the
calendar at no charge, and access enhancements to their listing including advertising opportunities for a
minimal fee. This is available to all businesses in Edmonds regardless of Chamber affiliation. The
revenues from the enhanced listings and advertising would be used to support the site. He described
reasons to patronize local businesses including promoting a strong vital local economy, supporting and
enhancing unique local neighborhoods, creating quality jobs, and encouraging local prosperity. He urged
residents to think local, buy local and energize Edmonds.
He quoted the late Chamber President David Stern who was excited about the EverythingEdmonds
program, “the Chamber has long taken the lead in marketing Edmonds and Edmonds businesses to the
world. EverythingEdmonds is the next logical step for the Chamber and for Edmonds.” Mr. Denton
invited the public to learn more about EverythingEdmonds by emailing Everything@EdmondsWA.com
or calling the Chamber office at 425-670-1496, Ext. 3. He referenced the Chamber’s mission statement to
explain why the Chamber was at the forefront of this effort, “to promote the economic vitality of the
greater Edmonds business community through advocacy, leadership and education.”
Chris Moss, Web Designer, Ebb Web Design, demonstrated the navigation and information available on
the EverythingEdmonds website including a slideshow on the homepage of various areas of Edmonds,
event highlights, calendar of events, opportunity to suggest an entry for the calendar, a coupon page and
links on the home page to the City’s website, library, ferry schedules, etc. She relayed the Chamber’s
request for businesses to access the business partner login and confirm their business information. She
noted Chamber members had bolded listings, a feature other businesses could also access as well as
advertising opportunities and custom detail pages.
Councilmember Marin commended the Chamber on the EverythingEdmonds website, remarking it was a
great enhancement.
Councilmember Dawson agreed this was a great site and was glad all Edmonds businesses had been
included. She applauded the Chamber for the work they had done.
Council President Olson also commended the Chamber on the site, noting the Friends of the Edmonds
Library could advertise their events on the website.
Mayor Haakenson asked whether the Chamber was accepting donations for 4th of July. Ms. Vance
answered they were and invited the public to send donations to the Greater Edmonds Chamber of
Commerce, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020.
Packet Page 6 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 4
4. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ON DOWNTOWN DESIGN STANDARDS.
(Councilmember Plunkett joined the Council via telephone for this item.)
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) met with the
Council in February 2007 where additions to the downtown design were discussed, particularly for the
BD1 zone, the retail corridor. After further work, the HPC has presented an outline of their ideas to the
Council. Many of the concepts are not yet detailed but the HPC is attempting to indicate their intent. He
contrasted this with the design guidelines the HPC developed based on Mark Hinshaw’s work with the
Council in 2005. The HPC’s intent is to work with the Planning Board to develop potential amendments
to development standards, codes, etc. that would be presented to the Council. He noted the amendments
would require public hearings at the Planning Board and City Council. Tonight’s presentation was
intended to inform the Council of the direction in which they were proceeding. He referred to City
Attorney Scott Snyder’s memo that indicated the Architectural Design Board (ADB) should be included
in the discussion. He anticipated the ADB would be involved in developing the amendments.
Mr. Chave reviewed the HPC’s report:
• Purpose section - add a purpose section to describe the intent.
• Rename the BD1 zone - Heritage Center of Edmonds. He explained the interim name captured
three concepts, 1) Edmonds, 2) the area as the center and identity of Edmonds, and 3) the heritage
of the BD1.
• Develop Design Standards - words and pictures describing characteristics in detail. He noted
these were labeled guidelines but the HPC wants them adopted as standards that every
building/project in the BD1 would be required to meet.
• Threshold for Design Review - The HPC feels the traditional standard that requires an ADB
hearing, exceeding the SEPA threshold, was too high as there could be significant impacts on
historical buildings via renovations that did not meet SEPA. He noted the standard must be
specific and could not be vague or unpredictable. Another concern is not capturing too many
projects due to time delays caused by ADB review. He noted the goal was to balance the process
to ensure the designs were what the City wanted to achieve without unduly burdening the process.
• Design Review Process - The HPC recommends having two HPC members on the ADB when
projects specifically located in the Heritage District/BD1 are reviewed. The HPC feels their
expertise in historic buildings would be helpful to the ADB.
• Applications for ADB Review - This section contains the features the HPC feels are important
and should be considered in the review. He noted most of these items were consistent with the
changes in the design review process with the exception of color. He stated review of color was
usually done via historic districts as color was often identified with a particular point in time.
Historic districts typically adopt a pallet of colors used during a particular historic period. The
challenge for downtown Edmonds would be to determine that historic pallet because multiple
pallets for multiple points in time would make regulation difficult.
• Demolition - The HPC recommends a waiting period before a building could be demolished. He
noted there would be no power to prevent the demolition but the intent was to provide time for
the HPC to work with the owner or prospective purchaser regarding adaptive reuse opportunities,
identifying a different buyer, etc. He noted this technique had been used in historical districts in
other communities and was often successful. He clarified the HPC was not advocating a waiting
period for all demolition, only significant demolition.
Packet Page 7 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 5
• Incentives - The HPC was interested in developing incentives for preserving structures and
providing a break for property owners trying to do the right thing via more flexible building
codes, reduced permit fees, streamlined processing, etc.
• EHPC Participation in the Process - The HPC wants to work with the Planning Board and ADB
in an effort to develop language that could be adopted as code amendments.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the incentives section and the language that buildings on the Edmonds
Register of Historic Places be allowed to go outside the existing building’s envelope. He anticipated the
only way this could occur would be to increase the building’s height. He asked whether this would be
addressed by the non-conforming regulations that the Planning Board was currently reviewing. Mr.
Chave answered that was largely true but the HPC was concerned with providing enough flexibility for
unusual circumstances that would maintain the character of a building and enhance its viability.
Mr. Snyder advised the Planning Board would be discussing the non-conforming use provisions in the
context of adaptive reuse at their next meeting. He provided examples such as limitations on the amount
of glass due to the new energy codes. The intent was to review building code requirements that were not
health safety related that could be altered in order to make the retention of an existing building more
economically attractive/viable - to provide incentives to retain a building rather than demolish it.
Councilmember Wambolt did not want this to be a way to increase heights. Mr. Chave assured that was
not the intent and that would not be expected from the HPC. Mr. Snyder commented assuming the public
liked Edmonds the way it was, the intent was to encourage property owners to retain those buildings.
Councilmember Marin spoke in favor of forwarding the HPC’s recommendations to the Planning Board.
He noted although there were a number of interesting old buildings downtown that should be retained,
there were no grand, architecturally significant buildings as compared to Fairhaven or Port Townsend for
example. He recalled discussions in the past few years that highlighted the importance of maintaining a
vital downtown retail core and was satisfied the HPC’s proposal met that intent. He was not opposed to
the name “Heritage Center” but did not want the concept of maintaining a vital downtown retail core to be
overlooked. He referred to old buildings that had been architecturally enhanced and improved,
commenting he viewed the design guidelines as a method of improving the downtown core.
Councilmember Dawson referred to Mr. Snyder’s memo, pointing out there were few truly historic
buildings downtown but there were many buildings that added a feeling, character and charm to
downtown that because it had been developed over time, could not be recreated artificially. She spoke in
favor of developing incentives that encouraged the retention and restoration of existing buildings,
remarking without incentives, it may not be economically feasible to retain an existing building, making it
more attractive for a developer to demolish it. She suggested expanding the definition of what the HPC
was trying to preserve. She found heritage rather than historic appropriate for the downtown core.
Councilmember Dawson was intrigued by having an HPC member serve temporarily on the ADB when
reviewing buildings in the downtown area and asked whether that was done in other areas. Mr. Chave
answered he was not aware of any other cities that had a difference in membership on the ADB depending
on the location of the project. It was more common to have a separate board for each district. Mr. Snyder
pointed out the definition of the ADB membership included architects, landscape engineers, etc.;
therefore, it was consistent to have members with different expertise. Mr. Chave commented an
alternative may be to change the requirement for the ADB to include a member with historic expertise.
Councilmember Orvis proposed a scenario of a 35-foot tall historic building that had no elevator; the
property owner wanted to restore it and add an elevator which would require the addition of a penthouse.
Packet Page 8 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 6
Under the non-conforming provisions that would not be allowed because the building would not be
allowed to go higher than five feet for an elevator. Mr. Chave noted the intent was to make retaining the
building viable. Mr. Snyder clarified life and safety requirements could not be waived nor accessibility
requirements.
Council President Olson asked whether the ADB would be involved before the proposal was presented to
the Planning Board. Mr. Chave envisioned an initial presentation/discussion with the Planning Board and
then a meeting with representatives from both groups. He noted the entire Board members did not
necessarily need to be present; they could designate a few members from each to meet.
Council President Olson asked whether the Planning Board would hold a public hearing. Mr. Chave
answered yes as amendments to the development code required a public hearing. The Council would also
hold a public hearing.
Councilmember Marin remarked Councilmember Orvis’ scenario regarding the addition of an elevator
was a remote possibility. He supported Councilmember Dawson’s comments regarding providing
incentives to preserve buildings. He recommended establishing sufficient flexibility so that a property
owner would feel they had a chance when asking for a deviation while making sure they were carefully
worded so that the result was not an increase in building heights downtown.
Mayor Haakenson advised Councilmember Plunkett was having difficulty hearing the Council via
telephone and was satisfied with the HPC’s outline proceeding to the Planning Board. It was the
consensus of the Council for the HPC to proceed to the Planning Board.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, advised the court’s consideration of the Old Woodway Elementary School
demolition, case #07-2-03222-1 was continued to May 25 at 9:00 a.m. The judge has indicated he plans
to make a final decision at that time. Next, Mr. Rutledge urged Council to discuss term limits for the
Mayor prior to January 1, noting the legislature planned to consider term limits during the next session.
Mr. Rutledge then commented on past population increases, pointing out the population in 1963 was
19,273, it was 29,720 in 1989 and was forecast to be 37,000 by 2010 and 40,000 by 2015. He concluded
growth had been greater than expected due in part to annexations.
Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, displayed a bag of incandescent light bulbs that as a result of Mayor
Haakenson’s proclamation he replaced with compact florescent bulbs that use one fourth the electricity.
He noted florescent bulbs paid for themselves within 9-18 months and the bulbs last ten years. He
displayed a chart of his household energy use that he tracked using his energy bills that illustrated during
the last year the daily kilowatt use. He summarized his household’s daily energy use was 12 kilowatt
hours per day or ½ kilowatt per hour which was the equivalent of leaving five 100 watt light bulbs on 24
hours per day which he noted was very low. He urged the public to look at their electric meters and try to
make them stop.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Council discussion regarding Wi-Fi and his conversation with
Administrative Services Director Dan Clements regarding Edmonds’ ability to capture that system. He
asked what the City would do with the system once it was in place, suggesting the City move forward
cautiously. He urged Council to read and discuss the article in today’s Everett Herald. Next, he
expressed concern with Bob Gregg’s offer to settle his lawsuit in exchange for something he wanted from
the City. He recalled when Mr. Gregg was seeking approval for the Old Milltown project the second
time, he stated he would cancel the lawsuit if he got what he wanted, which he apparently had not done.
He acknowledged there likely had been discussion in Executive Session about the lawsuit and now there
Packet Page 9 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 7
was a public hearing scheduled regarding Mr. Gregg’s tradeoff. He requested the City explain the
proposal to the public to allow them to prepare for the public hearing. He urged Council not to be
intimidated by Mr. Gregg.
6. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS.
Council President Olson reported in late April, the South Snohomish Cities group organized a dinner with
Snohomish County cities which was attended by four Snohomish County Councilmembers. There was a
very good dialogue regarding issues affecting the cities and ways to improve communications. Next she
reported on a presentation at the SeaShore Transportation Forum from the Port of Seattle who is working
on a land swap whereby King County would swap Boeing Field to the Port of Seattle and in return get a
42 mile rail corridor from Renton to Snohomish and a spur from Woodinville to Redmond. She
explained the corridor would be used for trails as well as the Dinner Train.
Councilmember Dawson reported there was no SnoCom meeting last month. She reported on the
Enhanced 911 Board meeting today that included discussion of budget issues and their ability this year to
set aside funds toward funding for a new CAD system. She reported the Board also discussed recognition
of the work done by David Stern as Chair of the E-911 Board. She advised due to Chief Stern’s passing,
Greg Lineberry had assumed the role of Chair and Steve Perry agreed to serve as Vice-Chair.
Councilmember Wambolt reported at the April 30 Port meeting, the Commission approved the placement
of an outdoor pool on the Harbor Inn site, one of the upgrades required to be a member of the Best
Western chain. He reported Skipper’s had closed and the owners had filed for bankruptcy. The Skipper’s
site was part of the area being considered for redevelopment. At the May 14 meeting, the Port approved a
new 30-year agreement with the City and the Department of Fisheries for operation of the fishing pier.
The Commission also accepted a letter of intent from Horizon Marine, formerly known as Jacobsen’s
Marine, to construct a 13,000 square foot building on the Port property. The Commission also reviewed
the design of a new restroom building that includes laundry facilities. The Commission agreed to change
their first meeting of the month to Monday afternoon at 1:00 p.m. After he alerted them that a daytime
meeting may make it difficult for Councilmembers in the future, they are reconsidering the change.
Councilmember Marin reported the Highway 99 Task Force met yesterday and had a presentation from
Steven’s Hospital that included preliminary drawings of a new large hospital structure. One of the
components was the potential for a mixed use retail building on their campus on Hwy. 99 which would
coordinate well with retail planned in a portion of the Top Foods parking lot. Next Councilmember
Marin reported he had been selected by Snohomish County Cities and Towns to serve on the Puget Sound
Regional Council Transportation Policy Board. Last month the Transportation Policy Board voted to
develop a regional traffic operations committee comprised of representatives from cities in the region and
traffic engineers to work on traffic signal coordination. Coordination of traffic signals could cut travel
time on arterials by up to 20%. He noted coordination of traffic signals throughout the region would
likely require a contribution from each city.
Councilmember Marin reported the Sound Transit Central Link Oversight Committee was discussing the
University link project from the Paramount Theater to the University District. There were 24 value
engineering studies underway that have determined a potential cost savings of over $90 million.
Unfortunately most of the savings would likely be used to offset the additional cost due to escalating
building costs. He was pleased as a member of the Sound Transit Board and as a taxpayer that Sound
Transit was doing that level of scrutiny to trim costs.
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson reminded Council and the public of the annual Memorial Day Service which will be
held at the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery at 11:00 a.m.
Packet Page 10 of 302
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 22, 2007
Page 8
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS
In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comment about the Everett Herald article, Councilmember Wambolt noted
the article was in regard to cities who were failing in providing wireless telephone service; the City was
not proposing to provide wireless telephone service, only internet and television. The article also stated
one of the cities that was struggling with implementation may have their revenue problems solved if they
were able to start monitoring water meters. He noted staff was already considering that possibility. He
summarized there was a superior team of people working on this issue and if the City decided to move
forward, there would be public hearings.
Councilmember Marin expressed his appreciation for the marvelous work being done by the Historic
Preservation Commission.
9. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
Packet Page 11 of 302
AM-1005 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #96460 through #96614 for May 24, 2007 in the amount of $440,499.08
and #96615 through #96751 for May 31, 2007 in the amount of $234,953.60.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Claim checks 5-24-07
Link: Claim checks 5-31-07
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 05/31/2007 02:29 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Linda Hynd 05/31/2007 02:42 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/31/2007 03:12 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Linda Hynd 05/31/2007 03:57 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 05/24/2007 11:45
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/31/2007
Packet Page 12 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96460 5/18/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY Arco Stn #822 COPIES/POSTAGE
Copies & Postage re: ARCO Stn 822
001.000.610.519.700.490.00 31.64
Total :31.64
96461 5/24/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 240117 RODENT CONTROL
RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 80.04
Total :80.04
96462 5/24/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 241108 1-13992
PEST CONTROL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 57.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 5.12
Total :62.62
96463 5/24/2007 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND JUNE 2007 JUNE 2007 KENNELING SERVICES - EDMONDS
JUNE KENNELING SERVICES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 1,856.26
Total :1,856.26
96464 5/24/2007 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101282863 M5Z34
CALIBRATION GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 303.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 17.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 28.52
Total :349.02
96465 5/24/2007 000710 ALASKAN COPPER & BRASS 419008-1 STAINLESS STEEL TUBING
1Page:
Packet Page 13 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96465 5/24/2007 (Continued)000710 ALASKAN COPPER & BRASS
STAINLESS STEEL TUBING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 210.60
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 18.74
Total :229.34
96466 5/24/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3879723 LAUNDRY SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.00
Total :36.76
96467 5/24/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3879725 18386001
uniforms
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.81
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.64
Total :93.45
96468 5/24/2007 071419 ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO MCKENZIE0929 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR MEADOWDALE
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 200.00
Total :200.00
96469 5/24/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 558240 75179
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,556.98
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 204.56
Total :2,761.54
96470 5/24/2007 069699 AUDIO VISUAL SPECIALISTS 71378 BIRDFEST EQUIPMENT
2Page:
Packet Page 14 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96470 5/24/2007 (Continued)069699 AUDIO VISUAL SPECIALISTS
MICROPHONE, SPEAKER, ETC. FOR BIRDFEST
001.000.240.513.110.450.00 125.00
Sales Tax
001.000.240.513.110.450.00 11.13
Total :136.13
96471 5/24/2007 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 74247 UNIT EQ12EN - 2C LOGOS WITHOUT LETTERING
UNIT EQ12EN - 2C LOGOS WITHOUT LETTERING
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 174.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.49
Total :189.49
96472 5/24/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 40578 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #500 PRINTING
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 36.83
UB Outsourcing area #500 PRINTING
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 36.94
UB Outsourcing area #500 POSTAGE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 103.60
UB Outsourcing area #500 POSTAGE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 103.60
UB Outsourcing area #500 PRINTING
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 36.83
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.28
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.28
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.28
Total :327.64
96473 5/24/2007 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST June 2007 JUNE 2007 AWC PREMIUMS
3Page:
Packet Page 15 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96473 5/24/2007 (Continued)001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST
06/07 Fire Pension AWC Premiums
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 4,396.65
06/07 Retirees AWC Premiums
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 25,382.10
06/07 Gaydos AWC Premiums
001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,004.18
06/07 AWC Premiums
811.000.000.231.510.000.00 268,267.39
Total :299,050.32
96474 5/24/2007 069563 BAILEY, TODD BAILEY0520 CPR/FIRST AID INSTRUCTOR
CPR AND FIRST AID COURSE FOR GYMNASTICS
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 350.00
Total :350.00
96475 5/24/2007 069297 BANK OF AMERICA 0710132735 CUSTOMER #16-657082
4Page:
Packet Page 16 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96475 5/24/2007 (Continued)069297 BANK OF AMERICA
Allocation of Phone System Costs
001.000.390.591.730.790.00 10,117.60
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.652.582.391.790.00 950.66
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.654.582.391.790.00 2,334.54
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.655.582.391.790.00 1,410.16
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.656.582.391.790.00 2,049.71
Allocation of Phone System Costs
001.000.390.592.730.830.00 1,518.73
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.652.592.391.830.00 142.70
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.654.592.391.830.00 350.43
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.655.592.391.830.00 211.68
Allocation of Phone System Costs
411.000.656.592.391.830.00 307.68
Total :19,393.89
96476 5/24/2007 071658 BANNICK, PAUL BANNICK0518 KEYNOTE PRESENTER FOR BIRDFEST
PUGET SOUND BIRDFEST -~
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 300.00
Total :300.00
96477 5/24/2007 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 4570 AD FOR CEMETERY
CLASSIFIED AD FOR CEMETERY SITES
130.000.640.536.200.440.00 52.00
Total :52.00
96478 5/24/2007 002258 BENS EVER READY 19447 FS 20 - FIRE EXTINGUISHER REQUIRED
5Page:
Packet Page 17 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96478 5/24/2007 (Continued)002258 BENS EVER READY
FS 20 - FIRE EXTINGUISHER REQUIRED
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 55.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 4.94
Total :60.44
96479 5/24/2007 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS 794 E5GA.Services 04/20/07
E5GA.Services 04/20/07
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 2,999.03
Total :2,999.03
96480 5/24/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 585889 INV#585889 EDMONDS PD - BARKER/LAWLESS
SERVICE BARS FOR 3 SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.65
PAIRS OF SGT CHEVRONS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.66
INV#586142 EDMONDS PD - COLLAR BRASS586142
COLLAR BRASS
001.000.410.521.100.240.00 16.60
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.240.00 1.48
6Page:
Packet Page 18 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96480 5/24/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#586164 EDMONDS PD - SMITH, DEBBIE586164
UNIFORM TROUSERS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 106.95
LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRT
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 79.95
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 6.50
NAVY TIE
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 5.95
SHOES
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 50.00
PAIR OF SGT CHEVRONS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 2.95
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 22.45
INV#586351 EDMONDS PD - BARKER586351
LAPD STYLE HAT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 44.95
NAVY TIE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.95
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.65
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.75
Total :383.44
96481 5/24/2007 065341 BRIANS UPHOLSTERY 5407 UNIT 63 - REBUILD & REPAIR SEAT
UNIT 63 - REBUILD & REPAIR SEAT
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 145.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 12.32
Total :157.32
96482 5/24/2007 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC IL07116 UNIT 91 - PRESSURE GAUGE
7Page:
Packet Page 19 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96482 5/24/2007 (Continued)002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC
UNIT 91 - PRESSURE GAUGE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 28.51
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.95
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.15
Total :40.61
96483 5/24/2007 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN0519 BIRD FEST PRESENTER
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST PRESENTER:
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
96484 5/24/2007 003145 C & M TROPHY CO 50141 GYMNASTICS AWARD
GYMNASTICS TROPHY SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 35.30
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 3.14
Total :38.44
96485 5/24/2007 068152 CADDY, OWEN T 05232007 CONSULTANT SERVICES
FIFTH PHASE: INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 2,000.00
Total :2,000.00
96486 5/24/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY106883 2954000
WELDING ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 350.61
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 31.21
Total :381.82
96487 5/24/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY107235 ALS SUPPLIES
8Page:
Packet Page 20 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96487 5/24/2007 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 66.28
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.90
Total :72.18
96488 5/24/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN04071009 SEWER - CYLINDER RENTAL
SEWER - CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.655.535.800.450.00 7.75
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.450.00 0.69
Total :8.44
96489 5/24/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460629386 UNIFORMS
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPS UNIFORMS460629387
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 109.17
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.72
UNIFORMS460630413
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.75
Stn. 17 - Ops
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.75
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.61
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.61
9Page:
Packet Page 21 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96489 5/24/2007 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
OPS UNIFORMS460630433
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03
UNIFORMS460634526
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPS UNIFORMS460634527
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51
UNIFORMS460635563
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.75
Stn. 17 - Ops
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.75
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.61
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.61
OPS UNIFORMS460635587
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03
Total :1,027.62
96490 5/24/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 1-218359-279832 2202 205th St
2202 205th St
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 13.80
10Page:
Packet Page 22 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :13.80964905/24/2007 035160 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE
96491 5/24/2007 071480 CLEAR CUT PLASTICS INC 26728 SUPPLIES
CLEAR LEXAN
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 361.60
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.18
Total :393.78
96492 5/24/2007 067186 CLEAR IMAGE INC 37342 INV#37342 EDMONDS PD-WILSON PUBLIC DISC
REPRINTS FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 24.19
8.5% Snohomish County
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.06
Total :26.25
96493 5/24/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1788449 005302
HAND SOAP/KITCHEN TOWELS/BIG FOLD PAPER
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 202.17
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 2.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 18.22
Total :222.89
96494 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715 6308 7506 5817 E7FD.Replacement membrane for testing
E7FD.Replacement membrane for testing
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 29.96
Total :29.96
96495 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630001578691 4715 6300 0157 8691 COURT
Travel Leyda S Court Training
001.000.230.512.501.430.00 179.66
Total :179.66
96496 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630535885687 So. County Mayor's luncheon (5/2/07)
11Page:
Packet Page 23 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96496 5/24/2007 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
So. County Mayor's luncheon (5/2/07)
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 20.00
Global warming books for council4715630636395271
Global warming books for council
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 88.81
Retirement poster - A. Chrisman
001.000.210.513.100.410.00 183.10
Total :291.91
96497 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630345742425 CREDIT CARD PURCHASES
COPIES & FOLDING
123.000.640.573.100.490.00 286.19
FORTUNE COOKIES FOR SKATE PARK OPENING
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 79.99
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES: REPAIR PARTS FOR
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 81.00
MUSIC FOR SPRING GYMNASTICS SHOW
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 80.61
AIR FARE FOR FRANCES CHAPIN - AMERICANS
001.000.640.574.200.430.00 141.40
REGISTRATION FOR AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 175.00
DISCOVERY PROGRAM SHIRT
001.000.640.574.350.240.00 39.45
DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 38.06
DISCOVERY PROGRAM UNIFORM SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.350.240.00 92.51
ART COMMISSION SUPPLIES
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 30.45
BIRD FES SUPPLIES
001.000.240.513.110.310.00 48.95
MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION FOR MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.560.490.00 19.95
12Page:
Packet Page 24 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96497 5/24/2007 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
CREDIT CARD PURCHASES4715630624442994
ECONOMIC WORKSHOP: RENEE MCRAE
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 50.00
Total :1,163.56
96498 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715 6306 8856 9757 TRAVEL/KOHO
TRAVEL/KOHO
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 422.81
TRAINING/KOHO
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 725.00
LATE FEE
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 15.27
Total :1,163.08
96499 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715 6300 0170 8272 4715 6300 0170 8272 - EDMONDS
FALK/LEATHER JACKET~
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 516.80
INCIDENT COMMAND/WATER, FRUITS~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 43.93
4715 6300 0170 8298 - BARD4715 6300 0170 8298
DAMIAN SMITH/CERTIFICATE~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 9.95
CHAIRS (13)
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 1,414.26
4715 6300 0208 9821 - EDMONDS4715 6300 0208 9821
GUEST BOOKS/STERN MEMORIAL~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 35.90
13Page:
Packet Page 25 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96499 5/24/2007 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
4715 6302 2283 3263 - O'BRIEN4715 6302 2283 3263
SONY USB FLOPPY DRIVE
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 55.93
18" CADDY-BLUE
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 15.94
ON COMBAT/PAPERBACK
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 54.32
8 OZ CUPS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 80.69
THOMPAS GUIDE 2007
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 99.06
CAMERA LIGHT KIT
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 178.35
4715 6306 3771 2276 - GANNON4715 6306 3771 2276
DONUTS/CHIEFS MTG~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 17.50
PROPANE FOR HEATER~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 47.74
FUEL/GANNON DEPT. VEH.
001.000.410.521.100.320.00 20.06
STERN/PLAQUES/SHADOW BOX
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 217.27
DONUTS/MOTOR PERCESSION
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 62.91
DAMIAN SMITH/SAFETY CARD
001.000.410.521.220.490.00 14.95
Total :2,885.56
96500 5/24/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630143817577 DOL - VESSEL RENEWAL FEES
14Page:
Packet Page 26 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96500 5/24/2007 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
DOL - VESSEL RENEWAL FEES
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 23.25
RADIO SHACK - UNIT EQBFI111 - SUPPLIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.84
OFFICE DEPOT - SHOP SUPPLIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 97.98
PORT OF CHELAN - POWERUP - ELECT
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 150.00
MACNEIL AUTOMOTIVE - UNITS EQ11EQ &
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 450.11
ELECT LEAGUE OF T BELLEVUE - POWER4715630654555988
ELECT LEAGUE OF T BELLEVUE - POWER
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 125.00
STADIUM FLORIST - STERN FLOWERS,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 57.13
GUARDIAN SECURITY- OLD PW ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 55.00
PAYPAL - APWA PAYMENT4715630897461457
PAYPAL - APWA PAYMENT
001.000.650.519.910.490.00 35.00
Total :999.31
96501 5/24/2007 069162 CONSTRUCTION BOOK EXPRESS 1009614608 5556482
UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE BOOK
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 133.90
Total :133.90
96502 5/24/2007 065364 CONTRACT HARDWARE INC 0032467-IN FAC MAINT - LATCH ASSEMBLIES
FAC MAINT - LATCH ASSEMBLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 114.76
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.21
Total :124.97
96503 5/24/2007 071552 CUBBAGE, NANCY CUBBAGE8365 MOSAIC CLASS
15Page:
Packet Page 27 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96503 5/24/2007 (Continued)071552 CUBBAGE, NANCY
ECLECTIC MOSAIC MIRROR
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 175.00
Total :175.00
96504 5/24/2007 005965 CUES INC 267719 SEWER - CABLE MOTOR, ELIMINATOR, TOW,
SEWER - CABLE MOTOR, ELIMINATOR, TOW,
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 783.02
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.89
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 69.60
Total :857.51
96505 5/24/2007 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3192268 E1CC.Bid Invite 100th Ave West Const
E1CC.Bid Invite 100th Ave West Const
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 227.50
Total :227.50
96506 5/24/2007 070301 DIEHL, SHARON April-07 Mileage Court Training 4/17/07 Olympia
Mileage Court Training 4/17/07 Olympia
001.000.230.512.500.430.00 72.38
Total :72.38
96507 5/24/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2751 MINUTE TAKING
5/8 & 5/15 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 355.60
Total :355.60
96508 5/24/2007 070336 DOSSETT, MICHAEL DOSSETT0519 BIRD FEST WORKSHOP
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST WORKSHOP ON
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 100.00
Total :100.00
96509 5/24/2007 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 203392 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 58.10
16Page:
Packet Page 28 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96509 5/24/2007 (Continued)060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER
INTERPRETER FEE203393
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 57.29
INTERPRETER FEE203394
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 86.45
INTERPRETER FEE203395
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 79.86
INTERPRETER FEE203396
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 61.48
INTERPRETER FEE203397
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 56.08
Total :399.26
96510 5/24/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 80461 SUPPLIES
CASTROL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.55
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.03
Total :12.58
96511 5/24/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 152654 INV#152654 CLIENT#3713 EDMONDS PD
EXAM ON PUG - IMP#6902
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 37.60
Total :37.60
96512 5/24/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00025 CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 49.47
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM6-00200
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 115.20
17Page:
Packet Page 29 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96512 5/24/2007 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 80.91
MINI PARK6-00475
MINI PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 199.50
CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 84.01
CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 359.95
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 69.24
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)6-02900
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 60.99
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 114.22
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 38.85
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 71.42
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 78.69
WATER6-04425
8100 185TH PL SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 134.53
18Page:
Packet Page 30 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96512 5/24/2007 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
SIERRA PARK6-04450
SIERRA PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 90.23
BALLINGER PARK6-07775
BALLINGER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 76.13
YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 287.90
YOST PARK POOL6-08525
YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 161.57
Total :2,072.81
96513 5/24/2007 066220 EDWARDS, CAROLINE EDWARDS8090 SPANISH CLASSES
BEGINNING SPANISH FOR KIDS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 46.20
Total :46.20
96514 5/24/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 024567 COPIER MAINT
COPIER MAINT
001.000.230.512.501.480.00 34.98
Total :34.98
96515 5/24/2007 064723 FAIR, DOUGLAS March-07 Mileage Court Training 3/22/07
Mileage Court Training 3/22/07
001.000.230.512.500.430.00 76.61
Total :76.61
96516 5/24/2007 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU10361 RACHET
19Page:
Packet Page 31 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96516 5/24/2007 (Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
RACHET
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 99.14
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.14
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.19
Total :112.47
96517 5/24/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0094894 SEWER - S-CPLGCONC-12-010
SEWER - S-CPLGCONC-12-010
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 135.67
S-CPLGCONC-06-030
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 83.54
S-DONUTS-08-010
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 40.48
S-DUNUTS-06-010
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 28.50
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.150.310.00 25.65
Total :313.84
96518 5/24/2007 009835 FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INTL 9564 LEASE FOR CROWN VIC
UNIT 233 - FINAL PMT FOR 2004 CROWN VIC
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 1,066.97
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 98.16
MONTHLY LEASE; 5 CROWN VICS9565
UNIT 236,236,237,238,239 -Monthly Lease
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 3,358.33
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 308.96
Total :4,832.42
96519 5/24/2007 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 130017 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT
20Page:
Packet Page 32 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96519 5/24/2007 (Continued)070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200
06/01 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent
001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00
Total :300.00
96520 5/24/2007 065023 FLUKE ELECTRONICS CORP 4654018 1508619
CALIBRATION
411.000.656.538.800.410.22 372.00
15086194702409
CALIBRATION
411.000.656.538.800.410.22 240.00
Total :612.00
96521 5/24/2007 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY 2072208-01 COUPLING/SEAL/GASKET KIT
COUPLING/SEAL/GASKET KIT
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 285.28
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.61
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 26.16
BALL BEARINGS2072291-01
BALL BEARINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 48.80
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.60
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.20
Total :383.65
96522 5/24/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 46023 STREET - WASHINGTON READY MIX
STREET - WASHINGTON READY MIX
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 365.75
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 32.55
Total :398.30
21Page:
Packet Page 33 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96523 5/24/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9365717934 SUPPLIES
GREEN PAINT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 35.06
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.12
Total :38.18
96524 5/24/2007 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 06713.00-8 E6DA.Services thru 05/05/07
E6DA.Services thru 05/05/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 9,791.41
Total :9,791.41
96525 5/24/2007 064129 HENRY'S PLANT FARM 57717 GARDEN SUPPLIES
LAVENDER, COLEUS
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 104.40
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 9.29
FLOWER BASKETS58031
FUSHIA BASKETS
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 45.00
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 4.01
Total :162.70
96526 5/24/2007 068176 HUMANN, DEBI 5/07 Mileage reimb/AWC Labor Relations Conf
Mileage reimb/AWC Labor Relations Conf
001.000.220.516.100.430.00 151.68
Meal/AWC Labor Relations Conf
001.000.220.516.100.430.00 17.98
Total :169.66
96527 5/24/2007 070293 IHIA - INTERNATIONAL HOMICIDE RICHARDSON IHIA SYMPOSIUM/M.RICHARDSON-EDM
RICHARDSON/REGISTRATION~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 550.00
Total :550.00
96528 5/24/2007 061546 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY 701610 UNIT 31 - TOGGLE BOOT SEAL, 16MM ILLUM.
22Page:
Packet Page 34 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96528 5/24/2007 (Continued)061546 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY
UNIT 31 - TOGGLE BOOT SEAL, 16MM ILLUM.
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.48
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.00
Total :24.48
96529 5/24/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE 438095 SHOP - WIRE PLIERS W/CRIMPER
SHOP - WIRE PLIERS W/CRIMPER
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 26.99
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 2.40
FLEET RETURN438126
FLEET RETURNS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -88.50
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -7.88
UNIT 716 - WIPER BLADE SUPPLY440384
UNIT 716 - WIPER BLADE SUPPLY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 97.50
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.85
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.29
UNIT 476 - REPAIR SUPPLIES440385
UNIT 476 - REPAIR SUPPLIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 45.48
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.05
Total :96.18
96530 5/24/2007 063370 IVANJACK, SUSAN April-07 Mileage Court Training 4/19/07
Mileage Court Training 4/19/07
001.000.230.512.500.430.00 20.38
Total :20.38
23Page:
Packet Page 35 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96531 5/24/2007 068401 KING CO OFFICE OF FINANCE WRIA8-2639 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WATERSHED PLANNING
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WATERSHED PLANNING
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 2,733.46
Total :2,733.46
96532 5/24/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0020818 A5MA.Lidar Map thru 03/03/07
A5MA.Lidar Map thru 03/03/07
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 1,840.75
Total :1,840.75
96533 5/24/2007 061814 LEYDA, SHERRIE April-07 Mileage Court Training Spokane
Mileage Court Training Spokane
001.000.230.512.501.430.00 286.15
Mileage Court Training Ocean ShoresMay-07
Mileage Court Training Ocean Shores
001.000.230.512.501.430.00 141.53
Total :427.68
96534 5/24/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094421 Chair
Chair
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 246.53
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 21.94
Total :268.47
96535 5/24/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 3025 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 75.00
INTERPRETER FEE3026
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 120.00
INTERPRETER FEE3028
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
24Page:
Packet Page 36 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96535 5/24/2007 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA
INTERPRETER FEE3033
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER FEE3034
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 105.00
INTERPRETER FEE3036
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
Total :435.00
96536 5/24/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 64661086 123106800
OUTSIDE MICROMETER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 178.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.05
12310680064737600
ROD/MICROMETER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 366.48
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.95
12310680064768648
LOCTITE/ADHESIVE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 121.60
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.74
Total :684.82
96537 5/24/2007 064987 MCNICHOLS COMPANY 50558 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
FIBERGLASS PRODUCTS FOR YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 203.34
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.25
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.42
25Page:
Packet Page 37 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :262.01965375/24/2007 064987 064987 MCNICHOLS COMPANY
96538 5/24/2007 063773 MICROFLEX TAX Tax Audit Program
Tax Audit Program
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 62.77
Total :62.77
96539 5/24/2007 071657 MILLS, CHRIS 129751 CPL REFUND - RECEIPT 129751, CPL E543408
STATE SHARE OF CPL
001.000.000.237.190.000.00 18.00
WSP SHARE OF CPL
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 24.00
CITY SHARE OF CPL
001.000.000.322.900.000.00 18.00
Total :60.00
96540 5/24/2007 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0198858-IN UNIT EQ12EN - FA PLST 10 UNIT ANSI FL
UNIT EQ12EN - FA PLST 10 UNIT ANSI FL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 77.10
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.86
Total :83.96
96541 5/24/2007 024001 NC MACHINERY CO SECS0438773 UNIT 09 - OIL FILTERS
UNIT 09 - OIL FILTERS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.44
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.55
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.18
Total :51.17
96542 5/24/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0332242-IN FLEET- FILTER INVENTORY
FLEET- FILTER INVENTORY
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 92.22
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 7.93
26Page:
Packet Page 38 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96542 5/24/2007 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
SERVICE GENERATOR TANK0332343-IN
SERVICE GENERATOR TANK
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 170.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 14.62
Total :284.77
96543 5/24/2007 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB8349 TWILIGHT TOTS
TWILIGHT TOTS #8349
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 173.25
Total :173.25
96544 5/24/2007 063034 NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES 218072 13465
BOD STANDARD
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 90.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 8.03
Total :98.03
96545 5/24/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1496576.001 2091
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 29.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.49
Total :31.49
96546 5/24/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0078934 SODIUM BISULFITE
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 714.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 63.55
27Page:
Packet Page 39 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96546 5/24/2007 (Continued)066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC
SODIUM HYDROXIDE0079069
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
411.000.656.538.800.310.52 2,516.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.52 223.95
Total :3,517.75
96547 5/24/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0481691 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 92.20
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0481692
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02
Total :190.22
96548 5/24/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 477 PB Minutetaker for 5/9/07
PB Minutetaker for 5/9/07
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 210.00
Hist Presv minutetaker 5/20/07000 00 479
Hist Presv minutetaker 5/20/07
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 120.00
Total :330.00
96549 5/24/2007 067868 NW TANK & ENVIRONMENTAL 16049 FLEET - TANK MONITOR CERTIFICATION AND
FLEET - TANK MONITOR CERTIFICATION AND
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 1,015.00
Total :1,015.00
96550 5/24/2007 071665 O'HARA, SHANNON O'HARA0521 GYMNASTICS JUDGE
RHYTHMIC JUDGING FOR IN HOUSE
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 30.00
Total :30.00
96551 5/24/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 307410 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 277.67
28Page:
Packet Page 40 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96551 5/24/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
SUPPLIES758813
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 118.24
Total :395.91
96552 5/24/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 508721 OFFICE SUPPLIES
CD MEDIA
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 13.86
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 1.15
OFFICE SUPPLIES519996
VELCRO
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 10.45
NAME BADGE HOLDERS FOR BIRD FEST
001.000.240.513.110.310.00 12.27
Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 0.89
Sales Tax
001.000.240.513.110.310.00 1.04
Total :39.66
96553 5/24/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 804386 Pens, Notes pad, Air Duster, Adding
Pens, Notes pad, Air Duster, Adding
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 50.93
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 4.53
Note pads, batteries, flashlight,851143
Note pads, batteries, flashlight,
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 46.81
Freight
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.00
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 4.17
Total :107.44
29Page:
Packet Page 41 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96554 5/24/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 786135 520437
MOUSE PADS/COPIER PAPER/PENS
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 144.75
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 12.89
Total :157.64
96555 5/24/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 756013 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 148.62
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 13.22
OFFICE SUPPLIES804604
Paper supply
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 103.74
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 9.22
Total :274.80
96556 5/24/2007 068600 OGAARD, BARBARA OGAARD0519 BIRD FEST PRESENTER
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST PRESENTER: "GOING
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
96557 5/24/2007 026015 OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE OBT0107 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE~
123.000.640.573.100.410.00 1,650.00
Total :1,650.00
96558 5/24/2007 063750 ORCA PACIFIC 028103 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL CHEMICALS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,581.94
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 140.80
Total :1,722.74
96559 5/24/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00045837 UNIT 55 - LINEAR ACTUATOR
30Page:
Packet Page 42 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96559 5/24/2007 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
UNIT 55 - LINEAR ACTUATOR
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 576.70
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 52.34
Total :640.44
96560 5/24/2007 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.547517 FAC - PAINT SUPPLIES
FAC - PAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.07
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.07
LIBRARY - CARPET SHIELDS549318
LIBRARY - CARPET SHIELDS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.02
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.14
Total :39.30
96561 5/24/2007 070931 PATTON BOGGS LLP April 2007 DC LOBBYIST
DC Lobbyist for April 2007
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,000.00
Total :4,000.00
96562 5/24/2007 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 87204 INV#87204 EDMONDS PD - CASE 07-2012
TOW 418RMP AND SITE CLEANUP
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 310.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 27.59
Total :337.59
96563 5/24/2007 062770 PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL INC 704275 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:~
125.000.640.575.500.410.00 1,960.00
31Page:
Packet Page 43 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,960.00965635/24/2007 062770 062770 PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL INC
96564 5/24/2007 007800 PETTY CASH tc petty 4/23-5/21 coffee 2nd floor
coffee 2nd floor
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 29.98
mileage reimb-Linda Carl
001.000.210.513.100.430.00 21.74
cities and towns meeting-Linda Carl
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 32.00
parking-chesterfield
001.000.620.532.200.430.00 12.00
awc meeting, bellevue, Council~ Moore
001.000.110.511.100.430.00 26.68
council members to attend cities and
001.000.110.511.100.490.00 92.00
2 roundtrip bus tickets-community
001.000.510.522.100.430.00 12.00
parking reimb-Coccia
001.000.620.524.100.430.00 10.00
building safety week treats
001.000.620.524.100.310.00 26.46
mileage & parking reimb-Readwin
001.000.620.524.100.430.00 54.13
3 council members to attend cities and
001.000.110.511.100.490.00 96.00
mileage reimb-Thies
001.000.620.524.100.430.00 59.17
Total :472.16
96565 5/24/2007 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100-MY07 DM1000 MAILING SYSTEM LEASE
DM1000 Mailing System Lease~250-00149
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 792.00
Total :792.00
96566 5/24/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 0003870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER
32Page:
Packet Page 44 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96566 5/24/2007 (Continued)029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
Pier Electricity for
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.83
Stromwater Rent & Leasehold tax
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 472.83
UNIT F1 B1 FUEL04371
Fire Boat - Fuel~
511.000.657.548.680.320.00 1,486.92
Total :1,989.58
96567 5/24/2007 071662 PRICE, JEFF PRICE0519 BIRD FEST PRESENTER
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST~
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 400.00
Total :400.00
96568 5/24/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0016356-IN EDMCITW
SAFETY GLASSES
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 23.70
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 1.99
Total :25.69
96569 5/24/2007 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 07-254 COURT SECURITY
COURT SECURITY
001.000.230.512.500.410.00 1,380.00
Total :1,380.00
96570 5/24/2007 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 1438 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 125.00
Total :125.00
96571 5/24/2007 069879 SALTER JOYCE ZIKER PLLC 17080 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Prof Services 8th & Walnut
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 242.00
Prof Services Unocal clean-up
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 88.00
33Page:
Packet Page 45 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :330.00965715/24/2007 069879 069879 SALTER JOYCE ZIKER PLLC
96572 5/24/2007 071660 SARVEY AUDUBON SOCIETY SARVEY0519 RAPTOR EDUCATION
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST: RAPTOR EDUCATION
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 300.00
Total :300.00
96573 5/24/2007 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 115889 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
helmets
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 250.00
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 6.86
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 22.86
Total :279.72
96574 5/24/2007 070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC 76232 SR CENTER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL
SR CENTER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL
116.000.651.519.920.410.00 902.40
Total :902.40
96575 5/24/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0060791-IN UNIT EQ27PO - HALOGEN HIDE-A-WAY KIT
UNIT EQ27PO - HALOGEN HIDE-A-WAY KIT
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 60.00
UNIT EQ27PO - SERIAL CONTROL RELAY BOX0061358-IN
UNIT EQ27PO - SERIAL CONTROL RELAY BOX
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 249.00
Freight
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 42.00
UNIT EQ26FI - LED DASH LIGHT R/R0061533-IN
UNIT EQ26FI - LED DASH LIGHT R/R
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 240.60
PAIR ANGLE BRACKETS FOR TIR6 (INTERCOM)
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.60
34Page:
Packet Page 46 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96575 5/24/2007 (Continued)068489 SIRENNET.COM
UNIT EQ09FI - B LINK FLASHER, 4 OUTLET0061867-IN
UNIT EQ09FI - B LINK FLASHER, 4 OUTLET
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 3,290.40
Freight
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 107.50
UNIT EQ10FI - B LINK FLASHER, 8 OUTLET0061868-IN
UNIT EQ10FI - B LINK FLASHER, 8 OUTLET
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 3,172.20
Freight
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 114.50
Total :7,288.80
96576 5/24/2007 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 1-592509 UNIT 6 - HITCH PIN ASSEMBLY, BALL MOUNT
UNIT 6 - HITCH PIN ASSEMBLY, BALL MOUNT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.30
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.57
Total :19.87
96577 5/24/2007 071659 SKAGIT AUDUBON SOCIETY SKAGITAUDUBON0519 BIRD FEST PRESENTATION
"INTRODUCTION TO BIRDING" SPEAKER @
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
96578 5/24/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 260087 GARDENING SUPPLIES
MULCH
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 57.43
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.11
Total :62.54
96579 5/24/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2450016544 UTILITY BILLING
18500 82ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 70.87
35Page:
Packet Page 47 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96579 5/24/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER3430013627
OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 347.28
UTILITY BILLING3570014369
8030 185TH ST SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 129.54
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014245
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 28.77
Total :576.46
96580 5/24/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 34872 INV#34872 EDMONDS PD - NUMBER STAMP
6 DIGIT CASE #STAMP FOR SGTS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 28.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 3.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 2.76
Total :33.76
96581 5/24/2007 062280 SOUND SEAL & PACKING CO 11591 MECHANICAL SEAL
MECHANICAL SEAL
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3,355.43
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 38.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 302.06
Total :3,695.99
96582 5/24/2007 070677 SPRINT 5/7/07 INV FOR 5/7/07 ACCT#0620014133-1
PHONE DATA PLAN
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 102.64
Total :102.64
96583 5/24/2007 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 67714 E7CA.Jim Roberts thru 05/11/07
36Page:
Packet Page 48 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96583 5/24/2007 (Continued)069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC
E7CA.Jim Roberts thru 05/11/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 292.50
Total :292.50
96584 5/24/2007 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO June 2007 JUNE 2007 STANDARD INSURANCE PREMIUMS
June 2006 Standard Insurance Premiums
811.000.000.231.550.000.00 18,854.03
Total :18,854.03
96585 5/24/2007 070684 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 133600 53769
C 161 SCREENINGS SYSTEM PROJECT
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 3,104.68
Total :3,104.68
96586 5/24/2007 061912 SUN SUPPLY 0635330-IN STREET - WHITE 4MM 48"X96" COREX
STREET - WHITE 4MM 48"X96" COREX
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 43.55
Total :43.55
96587 5/24/2007 067835 T-MOBILE 135840772 CELL PHONE USEAGE
PARK MAINTENANCE CELL PHONES
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 85.93
Total :85.93
96588 5/24/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10530190 SUPPLIES
WASHERS, NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 429.09
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 38.19
SUPPLIES10530815
HIGH TEST CHAIN
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 127.82
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.38
Total :606.48
37Page:
Packet Page 49 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96589 5/24/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10530816 STREET - 32" SLEDGE HANDLES
STREET - 32" SLEDGE HANDLES
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 123.34
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 10.98
Total :134.32
96590 5/24/2007 067460 TANDEM SERVICE CORP INC 1074520 454F6
SEPTAGE HAULING
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,500.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 133.50
SEPTAGE HAULING1074591
SEPTAGE HAULING
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,050.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 93.45
Total :2,776.95
96591 5/24/2007 071663 TANGO MARKETING LLC 13928 POSTCARD PRINTING
BIRDFEST POSTCARD PRINTING FOR ON WING
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 43.00
Sales Tax
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 3.83
Total :46.83
96592 5/24/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 39615 GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS
GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 651.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 57.94
GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS39616
GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 892.80
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 79.46
38Page:
Packet Page 50 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96592 5/24/2007 (Continued)040916 TC SPAN AMERICA
GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS39618
GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 111.75
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 9.95
Total :1,802.90
96593 5/24/2007 071666 TETRA TECH CONSTRUCTION SERVIC BL Ref REFUND OF OVERPMT OF BUS LIC
Refund of Overpmt of Bus Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
96594 5/24/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1501182 E1CC.Bid Invite 100th Ave West Const
E1CC.Bid Invite 100th Ave West Const
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 100.80
Total :100.80
96595 5/24/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1503401 NEWSPAPER AD
Ordinance 3640
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 27.36
NEWSPAPER AD1503402
Ordinance 3641
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 27.36
NEWSPAPER AD1503404
Ordinance 3642
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 24.48
NEWSPAPER AD1503406
Ordinance 3643
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 33.12
NEWSPAPER AD1503407
Ordinance 3644
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 159.84
Total :272.16
96596 5/24/2007 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 13250 UNIT EQ12EN - KEY RACKS
39Page:
Packet Page 51 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96596 5/24/2007 (Continued)042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY
UNIT EQ12EN - KEY RACKS
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 19.93
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 1.77
Total :21.70
96597 5/24/2007 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE 07654 WATER QUALITY 2007 REPORT FLIERS -
WATER QUALITY 2007 REPORT FLIERS -
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 3,000.00
Total :3,000.00
96598 5/24/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-1124 CITY PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG-EMAIL
CITY PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG-EMAIL
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 51.91
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER425-775-1344
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 51.22
YOST POOL425-775-2645
YOST POOL
001.000.640.575.510.420.00 135.32
Total :238.45
96599 5/24/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-2844 POLICE T1 LINE
Police T1 Line 4/10 -5/10/07
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 374.01
Total :374.01
96600 5/24/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0423 03 0260 1032797592 07
AFTER HOURS PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 54.00
Total :54.00
96601 5/24/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-774-0944 FS #20-FAX LINE
FS #20-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 48.17
40Page:
Packet Page 52 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :48.17966015/24/2007 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
96602 5/24/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM
LIBRARY SCAN ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88
TELEMETRY STATIONS425-712-0417
TELEMETRY STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.07
TELEMETRY STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.07
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES425-712-8251
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 10.45
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 52.27
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.86
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 42.86
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 60.64
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS425-775-1534
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 160.09
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 297.30
Radio Line between Public Works & UB425-775-7865
Radio Line between Public Works & UB
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 50.59
41Page:
Packet Page 53 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96602 5/24/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
PUBLIC WORKS CPNNECTION TO 911425-RT0-9133
Public Works Connection to 911
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48
Public Works Connection to 911
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78
Total :897.58
96603 5/24/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0551368978 Mayor's cell ph (425) 238-1007 for the
Mayor's cell ph (425) 238-1007 for the
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 123.13
G. Haakenson cell ph. 425-367-2932 for
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 16.93
Total :140.06
96604 5/24/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0553782844 965420720-00001
PRETREATMENT/CELL
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 36.34
Total :36.34
96605 5/24/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 964212899-00001 206-947-3220
cell phone water quality
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 68.89
Total :68.89
96606 5/24/2007 071664 VITAMIN INSTITUTE CT37054 GARDENING SUPPLIES
50-IN-1
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 156.51
42Page:
Packet Page 54 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :156.51966065/24/2007 071664 071664 VITAMIN INSTITUTE
96607 5/24/2007 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 07-344 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
JULY 2007 - JUNE 2008 ~
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 234.00
Total :234.00
96608 5/24/2007 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2007-0726 INV#2007-0726 EDMONDS PD - JOB FAIR
BOOTH FEE FOR 4/7/07 JOB FAIR
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 158.00
Total :158.00
96609 5/24/2007 065828 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2007-0860 INV#2007-0860 - B.PAULSON/EDMONDS
B.PAULSON/REGISTRATION~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 100.00
REGISTRATION/J.LEE - EDMONDS2007-0884
J.LEE/REGISTRATION~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 35.00
Total :135.00
96610 5/24/2007 045515 WABO 13182 2006 IBC Structural/Seismic Design
2006 IBC Structural/Seismic Design
001.000.620.524.100.310.00 57.45
Total :57.45
96611 5/24/2007 045912 WASPC 40141 ELECTRONIC HOME MONITORING
ELECTRONIC HOME MONITORING
001.000.230.523.200.510.00 753.25
Total :753.25
96612 5/24/2007 069198 WESTERN WA REGION OF PNCWA 1449 TRAINING/GARCIA
TRAINING/GARCIA
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 120.00
TRAINING/SLENKER2449
TRAINING/SLENKER
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 145.00
43Page:
Packet Page 55 of 302
05/24/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
11:41:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96612 5/24/2007 (Continued)069198 WESTERN WA REGION OF PNCWA
TRAINING/MOORS2467
TRAINING/MOORS
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 145.00
Total :410.00
96613 5/24/2007 070649 WOOD, FRANCES WOOD0519 BIRD FEST PRESENTER
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST PRESENTER: "BIRDS
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 100.00
Total :100.00
96614 5/24/2007 071661 ZIMMERMAN, NEIL ZIMMERMAN0519 BIRD FEST PRESENTER
PUGET SOUND BIRD FEST WORKSHOP ON
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
Bank total :440,499.08155 Vouchers for bank code :front
440,499.08Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report155
44Page:
Packet Page 56 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96615 5/31/2007 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 0507365 SOFTBALL T-SHIRTS
SOFTBALL SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 819.45
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 72.93
Total :892.38
96616 5/31/2007 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 07-194 JANITORIAL SERVICE
JANITORIAL SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00
Total :334.00
96617 5/31/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 110425466 SHOP INVENTORY - BATTERY~
SHOP INVENTORY - BATTERY~
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 109.90
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 9.78
Total :119.68
96618 5/31/2007 068330 AMERICAN PRINTING 42440 PRETREATMENT FORMS
PRETREATMENT FORMS
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 140.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 12.46
Total :152.46
96619 5/31/2007 001634 AQUA QUIP 00508580 08239
CHLORINE TABS
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 716.36
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 63.76
Total :780.12
96620 5/31/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3884414 UNIFORM SERVICES
1Page:
Packet Page 57 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96620 5/31/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PARK MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.00
Total :36.76
96621 5/31/2007 069751 ARAMARK 312-3884416 18386001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.18
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.58
Total :92.76
96622 5/31/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3762023 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE REIMBURSE
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE REIMBURSE
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 -76.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 -6.69
FLEET UNIFORM SVC512-3873761
FLEET UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC512-3873763
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29
2Page:
Packet Page 58 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96622 5/31/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
FLEET UNIFORM TOWELS512-3878411
FLEET UNIFORM TOWELS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.30
FLEET UNIFORMS SERVICES
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 14.10
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.29
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.26
3Page:
Packet Page 59 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96622 5/31/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS512-3878412
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26
WATER UNIFORM SVC
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24
4Page:
Packet Page 60 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96622 5/31/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC512-3878413
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-3879724
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
FLEET - UNIFORM SVC512-3883042
FLEET - UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55
5Page:
Packet Page 61 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96622 5/31/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS512-3883043
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26
WATER UNIFORM SVC
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70
6Page:
Packet Page 62 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96622 5/31/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC512-3883044
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24
STREET/STORM - UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29
FAC MAINT - UNIFORM SVC512-3884415
FAC MAINT - UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
Total :146.26
96623 5/31/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-4741 CEMETERY
CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 28.01
Total :28.01
96624 5/31/2007 064343 AT&T 7303860502001 425-744-6057 PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works Fax Line
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 2.51
Public Works Fax Line
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 9.55
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 9.55
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 9.55
Public Works Fax Line
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 9.55
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 9.55
7Page:
Packet Page 63 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :50.26966245/31/2007 064343 064343 AT&T
96625 5/31/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-0152 STATION #16 FAX
STATION #16 FAX
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 28.05
Total :28.05
96626 5/31/2007 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 74303 BIRD FEST BANNER
BIRD FEST BANNER
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 509.00
Sales Tax
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 45.30
Total :554.30
96627 5/31/2007 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 67094 TROPHIES
MENS SOFTBALL TROPHIES
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 206.50
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 18.38
Total :224.88
96628 5/31/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9657272 RENTAL OF COPIER
RENTAL OF COPIER
001.000.230.512.501.450.00 153.55
Total :153.55
96629 5/31/2007 060502 BERG, COLIN BERG7623 TAIJIQUAN CLASSES
TAIJIQUAN #7623
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 425.25
Total :425.25
96630 5/31/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 583925 INV#583925 EDMONDS PD - GANNON
DUTY BELT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.95
King County Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.04
8Page:
Packet Page 64 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96630 5/31/2007 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#586929 EDMONDS PD - STERN BADGES586929
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 70.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.23
Total :126.22
96631 5/31/2007 071670 BOOTH, JAMES 4-00975 BOOTH, SELLER/GIBBONS, BUYER
RE: 00633-001195914-001 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 154.17
Total :154.17
96632 5/31/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1454945 127918
C-161 SCREENING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 6,464.69
Total :6,464.69
96633 5/31/2007 071434 BRUNETTE, SISSEL BRUNETTE8361 PRENATAL FITNESS
PRENATAL FITNESS #8361
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 105.00
Total :105.00
96634 5/31/2007 066914 BUSINESS TELECOM PRODUCTS INC 179503 HANDSET LIFTER
REMOTE HANDSET LIFTER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 52.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 4.42
Total :56.42
96635 5/31/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 107308 SUPPLIES
ACETYLENE, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 56.66
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.05
9Page:
Packet Page 65 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96635 5/31/2007 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
SUPPLIESLY 107309
OXYGEN, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.09
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.59
Total :93.39
96636 5/31/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT8101 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #8101
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 120.40
Total :120.40
96637 5/31/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460639637 UNIFORMS
volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
UNIFORMS460639638
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51
Total :166.81
96638 5/31/2007 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I07001114 WATER QUALITY WATER LAB ANALYSIS
WATER QUALITY WATER LAB ANALYSIS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 862.20
Total :862.20
96639 5/31/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1788449-1 LINERS
LINERS
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 72.32
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 6.44
10Page:
Packet Page 66 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96639 5/31/2007 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES
005302W1788449-2
SOAP
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 81.76
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 7.28
Total :167.80
96640 5/31/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1788943 FAC MAINT - WASHROOM CLEANER, C&P LABELS
FAC MAINT - WASHROOM CLEANER, C&P LABELS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 101.20
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.23
Total :112.93
96641 5/31/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1789746 OPS SUPPLIES
stations' supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 166.38
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 15.03
Total :183.91
96642 5/31/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 4715630497739054 DAYS INN - WA WATER & WASTEWATER
DAYS INN - WA WATER & WASTEWATER
411.000.655.535.800.430.00 660.33
Total :660.33
96643 5/31/2007 071671 COOPER, JOHN AND JEANETTE 3-01450 COOPER, SELLER/TOCIK, BUYER
RE: #04-0704-106 Utility Ref
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 103.19
Total :103.19
96644 5/31/2007 070986 CORNISH, JEFF CORNISH7567 GOLF PROGRAM
11Page:
Packet Page 67 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96644 5/31/2007 (Continued)070986 CORNISH, JEFF
GOLF PROGRAM #7567
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 490.00
Total :490.00
96645 5/31/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0991 OPS UNIFORMS
Batt chiefs
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 91.25
PREV UNIFORMS510-0995
Fire Marshal
001.000.510.522.300.240.00 47.10
PREV UNIFORMS510-1524
Fire Inspector
001.000.510.522.300.240.00 23.55
OPS UNIFORMS510-1539
BC/Training Officer
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 47.08
ADMIN UNIFORMS510-1884
Fire Chief
001.000.510.522.100.240.00 17.67
OPS UNIFORMS510-2341
Asst. Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 29.43
Total :256.08
96646 5/31/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING APRIL/MAY 2007 APRIL/MAY 2007
APRIL/MAY LAUNDRY & DRYCLEANING
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1,068.80
Total :1,068.80
96647 5/31/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 135300 OPS COMMUNICATIONS
ear pieces
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 260.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 23.14
Total :283.14
12Page:
Packet Page 68 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96648 5/31/2007 068357 EARTH TECH 92358-12-413621 E5FG.Services thru 04/27/07
E5FG.Services thru 04/27/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 3,407.81
Total :3,407.81
96649 5/31/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2919091 WATER- 4X24 LOCKING RING & WATER COVER
WATER- 4X24 LOCKING RING & WATER COVER
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 189.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 16.07
Total :205.07
96650 5/31/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 79730 UNIT 100 POL - ABSORBER, WASH MITT
UNIT 100 POL - ABSORBER, WASH MITT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.51
UNIT 93 - VENT SHADE79913
UNIT 93 - VENT SHADE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 99.99
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.90
UNIT 719 - FLOOR MATS80084
UNIT 719 - FLOOR MATS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.75
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.83
UNIT 475 - SWITCH80527
UNIT 475 - SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 44.88
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.99
Total :210.83
96651 5/31/2007 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP TOIKKA0523 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
13Page:
Packet Page 69 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96651 5/31/2007 (Continued)069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP:~
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 271.00
Total :271.00
96652 5/31/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-38565 WATER
18410 92ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 20.64
Total :20.64
96653 5/31/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-01127 WWTP WATER
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 38.85
WWTP WATER6-01130
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 22.90
WWTP WATER6-01140
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 565.27
Total :627.02
96654 5/31/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 20.64
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE3-03575
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 195.50
LIFT STATION #123-07525
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 52.63
LIFT STATION #153-07709
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 20.64
LIFT STATION #43-09350
LIFT STATION #4
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 63.25
14Page:
Packet Page 70 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96654 5/31/2007 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
LIFT STATION #103-09800
LIFT STATION #10
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 25.95
LIFT STATION #93-29875
LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 29.49
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT6-02735
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 522.90
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE6-02736
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 6.54
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE6-02737
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 77.95
PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION6-02738
PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 59.22
LIBRARY & SPRINKLER6-02825
LIBRARY & SPRINKLER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 496.02
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR)6-02875
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR)
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 11.45
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER6-02925
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 578.38
Fire Station #166-04127
Fire Station #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 211.84
fire sprinkler-FS #166-04128
fire sprinkler-FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 6.54
15Page:
Packet Page 71 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96654 5/31/2007 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Public Works Bldg6-05155
Public Works Bldg
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 51.51
Public Works Bldg
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 195.75
Public Works Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 195.75
Public Works Bldg
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 195.75
Public Works Bldg
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 195.75
Public Works Bldg
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 195.75
Public Works Fire Detector6-05156
Public Works Fire Detector
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 0.82
Public Works Fire Detector
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 3.11
Public Works Fire Detector
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 3.11
Public Works Fire Detector
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 3.11
Public Works Fire Detector
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 3.11
Public Works Fire Detector
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 3.08
Total :3,425.54
96655 5/31/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 024924 MK0653
COPIER MAINT.
411.000.656.538.800.480.11 173.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.480.11 15.42
Total :188.67
16Page:
Packet Page 72 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96656 5/31/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 024984 ADMIN REPAIR/MAINT
copier maint
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 50.24
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 4.47
Total :54.71
96657 5/31/2007 071634 ESCHELON TELCOM INC 010494746 - May PR1-1 City Phone Service 5/11-6/10-07
PR1-1 City Phone Service 5/11-6/10-07
001.000.390.528.800.420.00 788.93
C/A 010495174010495174
PR1-2 City Phone Lines 3/30-5/25/07
001.000.390.528.800.420.00 1,677.03
Total :2,465.96
96658 5/31/2007 010600 FOG TITE INC 236245 WATER METERS - M-METER-0.625-010
WATER METERS - M-METER-0.625-010
411.000.000.141.170.310.00 2,691.00
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.170.310.00 239.50
WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRLID-0.75-010236247
WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRLID-0.75-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 745.00
WATER - 50LBS BAG POTTERS IMPACT BEADS
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 138.00
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 66.31
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.28
Total :3,892.09
96659 5/31/2007 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY 2072250-01 EDMCIT
17Page:
Packet Page 73 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96659 5/31/2007 (Continued)067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY
SLEEVE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 69.82
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.33
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.69
Total :81.84
96660 5/31/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 48999 STREET - READY MIX
STREET - READY MIX
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 209.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 18.60
STREET - READY MIX49000
STREET - READY MIX
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 339.63
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 30.23
Total :597.46
96661 5/31/2007 063237 GOVERNING DS-Bowman Bowman subscription to Governing 1 yr
Bowman subscription to Governing 1 yr
001.000.620.558.800.490.00 19.95
Total :19.95
96662 5/31/2007 012198 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 0053002 MEMBERSHIP # 53553002
Membership/Clements & Junglov
001.000.310.514.100.490.00 120.00
Membership/Clements & Junglov
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 120.00
Total :240.00
96663 5/31/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5147322 112830-000
18Page:
Packet Page 74 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96663 5/31/2007 (Continued)012560 HACH COMPANY
ORP SOLUTION/CALIBRATION
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 291.80
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 25.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 27.88
112830-0005150909
LAB SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 139.10
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 15.05
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 13.56
Total :512.39
96664 5/31/2007 065412 HANAUER, NANCY HANAUER8246 PRINCESS PARTY
PINT SIZED PRINCESS PARTY~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 108.00
Total :108.00
96665 5/31/2007 064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD 52 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 234.00
Total :234.00
96666 5/31/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2091913 WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTERCHK-0.75-012
WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTERCHK-0.75-012
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,498.72
W-SETTER-0.75-012
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,212.80
W-RESET-0.75-018
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 59.35
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 246.61
19Page:
Packet Page 75 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96666 5/31/2007 (Continued)010900 HD FOWLER CO INC
WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRBOXPL-0.75-010I2095181
WATER INVENTORY - W-MTRBOXPL-0.75-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,392.96
W-MTRLIDDI-0.75-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 2,046.80
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 306.13
Total :6,763.37
96667 5/31/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 1030-84 Drug testing services
Drug testing services
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
96668 5/31/2007 071368 HEFFERAN, BRIGITTE HEFFERAN7663 CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES
ITALIC CALLIGRAPHY #7663
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 341.25
Total :341.25
96669 5/31/2007 071674 HENKELS & MCCOY INC Bus Lic Refund OVERPMT OF BUS LIC
Business License Refund/Overpmt
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
96670 5/31/2007 071673 HOLLENBECK, PHYLLIS 1-20900 HOLLENBECK, SELLER/RUDD, SELLER
RE: 4207-1021854 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 54.45
Total :54.45
96671 5/31/2007 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 440008597611 ACCT # 430001405909
Directory Listings P&R
001.000.390.528.800.420.00 111.50
Total :111.50
96672 5/31/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73321052 COPIER LEASE
20Page:
Packet Page 76 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96672 5/31/2007 (Continued)070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES
LEASE OF CANON COPIER~
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 523.07
Total :523.07
96673 5/31/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73297277 INV#73297277 467070-COMBINED INV EDMONDS
COPIER RENTAL 5/13-6/12/07
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 821.73
ADDITIONAL COPIES
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 313.82
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 101.07
Total :1,236.62
96674 5/31/2007 065947 INTL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE PN-1100A RECERTIFICATION
DAVE TIMBROOK~
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
96675 5/31/2007 065397 JOHNSON, ANDREW AJOHNSON0507 GYM MONITOR
GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 137.50
Total :137.50
96676 5/31/2007 015490 K & K CONCRETE PRODUCTS 0026801 STORM - CEMENT
STORM - CEMENT
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 271.60
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 24.17
Total :295.77
96677 5/31/2007 062477 KEEP POSTED 10973 BIRD FEST ADVERTISING
BIRD FEST ADVERTISING
120.000.310.575.420.440.00 212.00
Total :212.00
96678 5/31/2007 016600 KROESENS INC 76493 OPS UNIFORMS
21Page:
Packet Page 77 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96678 5/31/2007 (Continued)016600 KROESENS INC
Hepler shirt/nametags
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 43.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 3.87
Total :47.37
96679 5/31/2007 068024 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNKRUCKEBERG8084 BOTANIC GARDEN TOUR
KRUCKEBERG GARDEN TOUR #8084
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 75.00
Total :75.00
96680 5/31/2007 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 684166 INV#684166 EDMONDS PD - JAN/FEB 2007
JANUARY CARWASHES
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 150.00
FEBRUARY CARWASHES
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 140.00
Total :290.00
96681 5/31/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0020969 ESLHA Summary & ECDC 19.10 Consultation
ESLHA Summary & ECDC 19.10 Consultation
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 3,470.50
E2FA.Boring/Piezo Install/Consult0020974
E2FA.Boring/Piezo Install/Consult
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 5,957.84
Total :9,428.34
96682 5/31/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094511 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 176.42
Total :176.42
96683 5/31/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094414 NAMETAGS (ORDERED BY L. CARL)
Nametags (ordered by L. Carl)
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 18.50
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 1.65
22Page:
Packet Page 78 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :20.15966835/31/2007 018760 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
96684 5/31/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094503 PRINTING
PRINTED ENVELOPES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 92.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 8.19
Total :100.19
96685 5/31/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094509 BUSINESS CARDS EXEC FIN IT PD DEV SV
Business Cards:~250-00147
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 15.14
Erin S. Monroe250-00147
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 15.14
Carl Nelson250-00147
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 15.14
Justin D. Lee250-00147
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 15.14
Jim Lawless250-00147
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 15.14
Earl Yamane250-00147
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 15.15
Michael D. Clugston250-00147
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 15.15
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 1.35
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.35
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1.35
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 4.04
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.34
Total :115.43
23Page:
Packet Page 79 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96686 5/31/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 523049 SEWER - GRINDER PUMP E-1 - BEARINGS
SEWER - GRINDER PUMP E-1 - BEARINGS
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 48.36
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.30
Total :52.66
96687 5/31/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 566806 SUPPLIES
SPRAYER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 96.99
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.63
Total :105.62
96688 5/31/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 3038 INTERPRETER
INTERPRETER
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER3044
INTERPRETER
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER3045
INTERPRETER
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 105.00
INTERPRETER3046
INTERPRETER
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 135.00
INTERPRETER3048
INTERPRETER
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
INTERPRETER3050
INTERPRETER
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00
Total :420.00
96689 5/31/2007 066719 MCKENZIE & ADAMS INC 0068332 FAC MAINT - RAIN GEAR - BOOT, JACKET,
24Page:
Packet Page 80 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96689 5/31/2007 (Continued)066719 MCKENZIE & ADAMS INC
FAC MAINT - RAIN GEAR - BOOT, JACKET,
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 105.90
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 9.43
Total :115.33
96690 5/31/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 65016994 123106800
C-248 INSULATION
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 618.75
Freight
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 15.55
12310680065243073
CHANNEL END CAP/NUT
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 58.40
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 4.74
Total :697.44
96691 5/31/2007 069592 METROCALL Q0298897E INV#Q0298897E EDMONDS PD
PAGER SERVICE 5/27-6/26/07
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 79.98
Total :79.98
96692 5/31/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 41287 SUPPLIES
CARBURETOR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 132.78
Total :132.78
96693 5/31/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 46297 131
PROPANE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.34
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.54
Total :18.88
96694 5/31/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 46850 WATER / SEWER - REWIND STARTER
25Page:
Packet Page 81 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96694 5/31/2007 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
WATER / SEWER - REWIND STARTER
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.20
WATER / SEWER - REWIND STARTER
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.20
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.36
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.35
Total :33.11
96695 5/31/2007 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0194869-IN WATER- WORK JEANS
WATER- WORK JEANS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 85.05
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 7.49
WATER - WORK JEANS0194878-IN
WATER - WORK JEANS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 150.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 13.20
WATER/SEWER - COVERALLS0194883-IN
WATER/SEWER - COVERALLS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 210.63
WATER/SEWER - COVERALLS
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 210.62
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 7.26
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 7.26
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 19.18
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 19.17
26Page:
Packet Page 82 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96695 5/31/2007 (Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
WATER/SEWER SUPPLIES - RATCHET0194951-IN
WATER/SEWER SUPPLIES - RATCHET
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.10
WATER/SEWER SUPPLIES - RATCHET
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 8.10
WATER/SEWER SUPPLIES RAIN GEAR
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 79.30
WATER/SEWER SUPPLIES RAIN GEAR
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 79.30
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.71
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.71
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 6.98
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 6.98
WATER - INSULATED COVERALLS0195709-IN
WATER - INSULATED COVERALLS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 188.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 16.55
27Page:
Packet Page 83 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96695 5/31/2007 (Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
WATER/SEWER OVERALLS0195711-IN
WATER/SEWER OVERALLS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 42.13
WATER/SEWER OVERALLS
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 42.12
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 5.38
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 5.38
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 4.18
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 4.17
SEWER - JEANS0195732-IN
SEWER - JEANS
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 120.60
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 10.61
WATER- WORK JEANS0196607-IN
WATER- WORK JEANS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 99.75
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.88
WATER/SEWER - RUBBER BOOTS0200001-IN
WATER/SEWER - RUBBER BOOTS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 17.50
WATER/SEWER - RUBBER BOOTS
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 17.50
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 1.56
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 1.56
Total :1,505.91
96696 5/31/2007 024001 NC MACHINERY CO M0174801 STREET- 2007 CATERPILLER BACKHOE
28Page:
Packet Page 84 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96696 5/31/2007 (Continued)024001 NC MACHINERY CO
STREET- 2007 CATERPILLER BACKHOE
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 90,909.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 8,090.90
UNIT 74 - 2007 TOW MASTER BACKHOEM0178501
UNIT 74 - 2007 TOW MASTER BACKHOE
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 13,579.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1,086.32
Total :113,665.22
96697 5/31/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0333226-IN FLEET SHOP INVENTORY - FILTERS
FLEET SHOP INVENTORY - FILTERS
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 97.28
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 8.36
UNIT 91 - RYKON PREM OIL AND DRUM CHARGE0333405-IN
UNIT 91 - RYKON PREM OIL AND DRUM CHARGE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 584.66
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 50.27
Total :740.57
96698 5/31/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 323912314-065 C/A 323912314
IT Cell Phone Service 3/25-4/24/07
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 136.62
Total :136.62
96699 5/31/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 832127721-031 INV#832127721-031 EDMONDS PD
CELL PHONES 4/18-5/17/07
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 1,383.75
Total :1,383.75
96700 5/31/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0079306 SODIUM BISULFITE
29Page:
Packet Page 85 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96700 5/31/2007 (Continued)066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 854.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 76.03
Total :930.28
96701 5/31/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 11164859 Printing of Econ. Dev. Director job
Printing of Econ. Dev. Director job
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 80.00
Total :80.00
96702 5/31/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 370038 OFFICE SUPPLIES
PENCILS, TAPE, ETC.
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 25.13
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.15
OFFICE SUPPLIES434095
PAPER, MARKERS, INK CARTRIDGE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 131.69
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 11.72
OFFICE SUPPLIES456848
COVER STOCK
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 30.55
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.63
Total :203.87
96703 5/31/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 931584 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 57.59
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 5.12
Total :62.71
30Page:
Packet Page 86 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96704 5/31/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 862998 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - STAPLE REMOVERS,
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - STAPLE REMOVERS,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 72.10
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 6.42
Total :78.52
96705 5/31/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 923407 INV#923407 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
BINDER CLIPS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.12
CATALOG ENVELOPES 10X13
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 31.94
6-PACK OF PACKAGING TAPE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 24.40
SHREDDER FOR SGT. OFFICE
001.000.410.521.220.350.00 128.41
SHREDDER BAGS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.51
16-PACK OF AAA BATTERIES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.11
PHOTO INK CARTRIDGES - PIXMA
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 49.76
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.55
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.350.00 11.43
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 1.47
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 4.43
Total :292.13
96706 5/31/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9657269 ADMIN RENTAL/LEASE
31Page:
Packet Page 87 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96706 5/31/2007 (Continued)066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM
Admin copier
001.000.510.522.100.450.00 137.06
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.450.00 12.20
Total :149.26
96707 5/31/2007 071672 PERDOMO, JOSE AND LINDA 1-27485 PERDOMO, SELLER/SLOSSON, BUYER
Re: #00009172-001 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 87.24
Total :87.24
96708 5/31/2007 063890 PERFORMANCE SIGN PRODUCTS INC 42915 STREET - VINYL FOR FIRE BOAT SIGNS
STREET - VINYL FOR FIRE BOAT SIGNS
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 51.64
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 4.87
Total :61.51
96709 5/31/2007 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 22036.000043 E1BA.Thru 05/27 - Street/OVWSD
E1BA.Thru 05/27 - Street/OVWSD
112.506.630.595.330.650.00 1,934.53
E1BA.Thru 05/27 - Water
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 40.15
E1BA.Thru 05/27 - Storm
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 224.37
E1BA.Thru 05/27 - Sewer
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 12.27
Total :2,211.32
96710 5/31/2007 069198 PNCWA WESTERN WA REGION 1789 TRAINING/FERRO
TRAINING/FERRO
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 120.00
32Page:
Packet Page 88 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96710 5/31/2007 (Continued)069198 PNCWA WESTERN WA REGION
TRAINING/AMBURGEY2454
TRAINING/AMBURGEY
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 120.00
Total :240.00
96711 5/31/2007 069447 POINTS SHARP STEEL INC 07-1649 WATER / SEWER - POINTS, ASPHALT
WATER / SEWER - POINTS, ASPHALT
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 41.25
WATER / SEWER - POINTS, ASPHALT
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 41.25
FUEL SURCHARGE
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.24
FUEL SURCHARGE
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.24
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.78
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.78
Total :92.54
96712 5/31/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0016039-IN 0003806
MSDS BINDER
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 -16.63
EDMCITW0016078-in
DUST MASKS
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 45.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 3.79
Total :32.16
96713 5/31/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412818558 WATER - DUMPED CONCRETE
33Page:
Packet Page 89 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96713 5/31/2007 (Continued)068484 RINKER MATERIALS
WATER - DUMPED CONCRETE
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 70.35
WASHED SAND PLUS FEES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 123.71
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.11
Total :204.17
96714 5/31/2007 069593 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 00446-573216 UNIT K93 - WINDSHIELD
UNIT K93 - WINDSHIELD
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 142.64
Total :142.64
96715 5/31/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0061599-IN UNIT EQ26FI - INTERCOM
UNIT EQ26FI - INTERCOM
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 166.80
UNIT EQ27PO - LED LIGHTS0062039-IN
UNIT EQ27PO - LED LIGHTS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 121.60
UNIT EQ09FI - RADIO MOUNTING SUPPLIES0062116-IN
UNIT EQ09FI - RADIO MOUNTING SUPPLIES
511.200.657.548.680.310.00 269.45
Total :557.85
96716 5/31/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 259761 NURSERY SUPPLIES
CEMETERY BASKETS
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 73.94
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 6.58
GARDEN SUPPLIES260107
FERTILE MULCH
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.97
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.04
34Page:
Packet Page 90 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :105.53967165/31/2007 036955 036955 SKY NURSERY
96717 5/31/2007 036850 SMITH, SHERLUND D 54 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 150.00
Total :150.00
96718 5/31/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 4120014156 UTILITY BILLING
750 15TH ST SW~
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 15.37
SPRINKLER SYSTEM4160017333
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 68.22
Total :83.59
96719 5/31/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 738005953 958-001-000-8
WWTP ELECTRICITY
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 23,336.14
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1,400.17
Total :24,736.31
96720 5/31/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2070015082 LIFT STATION #7
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 145.23
SIGNAL LIGHT2330012283
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.28
LIFT STATION #22410016253
LIFT STATION #2
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 56.29
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE2440024129
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 131.20
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg2480017397
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 542.90
35Page:
Packet Page 91 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96720 5/31/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
LIFT STATION #42540012560
LIFT STATION #4
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 365.39
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER2670022181
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,107.99
SIGNAL LIGHT2790022228
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 47.95
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR2880027277
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 29.26
SIGNAL LIGHT3350014902
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 41.39
SIGNAL LIGHT3710011507
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 45.99
LIBRARY3720012057
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,829.46
LIFT STATION #123850011440
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 305.06
LIFT STATION #154070022027
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 28.77
LIFT STATION #114130026596
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 30.02
SIGNAL LIGHT4210013902
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 47.89
36Page:
Packet Page 92 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96720 5/31/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
STREET LIGHT4320012174
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 331.97
SIGNAL LIGHT4330014129
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 262.42
Public Works4840011953
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 74.35
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 282.54
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 282.54
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 282.54
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 282.54
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 282.53
SIGNAL LIGHT5360023807
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 15.37
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX5390028164
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 4,471.49
CITY HALL5410010689
CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,989.26
LOG CABIN5500019350
LOG CABIN
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 199.22
Total :15,539.84
96721 5/31/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC 229 BIRD FEST VAN RENTAL
37Page:
Packet Page 93 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96721 5/31/2007 (Continued)038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC
RENTAL OF 25 PASSENGER VAN WITH DRIVER
001.000.240.513.110.450.00 150.00
Total :150.00
96722 5/31/2007 064996 SPARTAN MOTORS CHASSIS INC IN00304399 UNIT 475 - EXTERIOR PUSH BUTTON HANDLES
UNIT 475 - EXTERIOR PUSH BUTTON HANDLES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 207.54
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.61
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.64
Total :236.79
96723 5/31/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2561868 STORM - SLING HOOKS WITH LATCH, SLING
STORM - SLING HOOKS WITH LATCH, SLING
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 199.38
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 17.15
Total :216.53
96724 5/31/2007 040250 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING 146261 SUPPLIES
GARDENING SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 373.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 31.71
Total :404.71
96725 5/31/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 016423 CITY HALL - TUBE GUARD
CITY HALL - TUBE GUARD
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 102.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.08
38Page:
Packet Page 94 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96725 5/31/2007 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
LIBRARY - 18W/35/4P/ALTO019776
LIBRARY - 18W/35/4P/ALTO
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 219.60
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.54
FS 17 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES028221
FS 17 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.60
PS - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.05
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.07
FS 16 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES028222
FS 16 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 131.09
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.67
LIBRARY - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES030068
LIBRARY - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 627.27
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.44
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.31
Total :1,280.72
96726 5/31/2007 070837 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 10371289-001 PW - SCISSORLIFT RENTAL FEES
PW - SCISSORLIFT RENTAL FEES
001.000.651.519.920.450.00 222.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.450.00 19.61
Total :242.11
96727 5/31/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10532717 SUPPLIES
39Page:
Packet Page 95 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96727 5/31/2007 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
HEX KEYS LONG ARM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.37
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.16
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.56
SUPPLIES10535769
SELF DRILL SCREW
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.42
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.16
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.67
Total :27.34
96728 5/31/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10532718 STREET - 1/2" HAMMERLOCK
STREET - 1/2" HAMMERLOCK
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 200.89
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 17.88
STORM - 12" ADJ WRENCH, UPSIDE-DOWN10532719
STORM - 12" ADJ WRENCH, UPSIDE-DOWN
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 262.42
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 23.36
SHOP - GREASE GUN10535078
SHOP - GREASE GUN
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.68
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.60
STORM - ADJUSTABLE WRENCHES AND10535079
STORM - ADJUSTABLE WRENCHES AND
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 86.93
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 7.74
40Page:
Packet Page 96 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96728 5/31/2007 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
STREET - SCREW PIN ANCHOR SHACKLE18800348
STREET - SCREW PIN ANCHOR SHACKLE
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 75.29
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 6.70
Total :737.49
96729 5/31/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 39604 STREET - 8 WORK T SHIRTS + XXL FEES
STREET - 8 WORK T SHIRTS + XXL FEES
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 92.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 8.19
STREET - 3 DENIM WORK SHIRTS + TALL39605
STREET - 3 DENIM WORK SHIRTS + TALL
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 87.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 7.75
Total :194.94
96730 5/31/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1505353 NEWSPAPER AD
Development Agreement Hearing
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 84.00
NEWSPAPER AD1505354
Sunset Ave Hearing
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 90.88
NEWSPAPER AD1505355
Ordinance 3645
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 24.48
NEWSPAPER AD1505358
International Code Hearing
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 33.12
Total :232.48
96731 5/31/2007 070577 TNEMEC CO INC 070031689 0-0057-6585
41Page:
Packet Page 97 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96731 5/31/2007 (Continued)070577 TNEMEC CO INC
EPOXOLINE PAINT
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 83.70
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.44
Total :91.14
96732 5/31/2007 064963 TOP FOODS 392810 OPS SUPPLIES
Stations' cleaning supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 14.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1.28
Total :15.64
96733 5/31/2007 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 13270 UNIT 189 - KEYS
UNIT 189 - KEYS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.50
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.58
Total :7.08
96734 5/31/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7459139 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
SPRAY HEAD COVER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 36.25
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.24
Total :39.49
96735 5/31/2007 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 377388 WATER - METER BOX PUMP
WATER - METER BOX PUMP
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 110.85
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.16
Total :124.01
96736 5/31/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425.775.2525 CITY HALL DIRECTORY LISTING
42Page:
Packet Page 98 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96736 5/31/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
City Hall Directory Listing 4/7-5/7/07
001.000.390.528.800.420.00 3.58
DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOCOM425-DHO-0667
Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom 4/19-
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 350.92
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet425-NW2-0887
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00
Total :634.50
96737 5/31/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-8379 MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM
MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88
PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM425-775-2455
PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 47.63
Total :62.51
96738 5/31/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-NW4-3726 FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM
FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM
001.000.510.528.600.420.00 247.00
Total :247.00
96739 5/31/2007 068265 VERIZON ONLINE 21262737 ACCT #8372119
City of Edmonds Internet Apr 2007
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 667.00
Total :667.00
96740 5/31/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 364280677-00001 360-929-3167
cell phone- Jim Kammerer
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 1.66
cell phone- Jim Kammerer
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 1.66
43Page:
Packet Page 99 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96740 5/31/2007 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
425-238-8846470091643-00001
cell phone-Tod Moles
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 33.96
425-238-5456470103273-00001
cell phone-Mike Johnson
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 29.73
425-327-5379670091643-00001
cell phone-unit #77
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 37.70
425-231-2668769986915-01
cell phone-water lead
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 57.06
Total :161.77
96741 5/31/2007 071656 VIGIL, MARY LOU Recp # 0102114 Refund $228.50 for Bldg Permit #07-0079
Refund $228.50 for Bldg Permit #07-0079
001.000.000.322.100.000.00 228.50
Total :228.50
96742 5/31/2007 071584 VILLALOBOS, JOEL VILLALOBOS0507 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 572.00
Total :572.00
96743 5/31/2007 045800 WA MUNICIPAL CLERKS ASSOC 3607544130 MEMBERSHIP
Annual Member. City Clerk & Deputy
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 150.00
Total :150.00
96744 5/31/2007 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 36979 INV#36979 EDMONDS PD CASE #07-2201
TOW FORD ESCORT 397SJN
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 124.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 11.03
Total :135.03
44Page:
Packet Page 100 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96745 5/31/2007 070264 WASHINGTON OAKES RETIREMENT 53 Assisted Living - Jim Martin
Assisted Living - Jim Martin
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 3,850.00
Total :3,850.00
96746 5/31/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0600912 TRAINING MISC
Boyle, Hills, Warren
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00
Total :400.00
96747 5/31/2007 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-5728 STREET - REMOVE DEAD TREE - ~
STREET - REMOVE DEAD TREE - ~
111.000.653.542.710.410.00 260.00
Total :260.00
96748 5/31/2007 069914 WATOA 062007 REGISTRATION FOR WATOA WORKSHOP JUNE
WATOA workshop reg for CS Dept
001.000.610.519.700.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
96749 5/31/2007 049208 WESTERN EQUIP DIST INC 509788 UNIT 118 - CASTER FORK ASSEMBLY
UNIT 118 - CASTER FORK ASSEMBLY
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 89.70
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.45
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.74
Total :106.89
96750 5/31/2007 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 240 MAY 06 RETAINER
May 06 Retainer
001.000.360.515.230.410.00 6,000.00
Total :6,000.00
96751 5/31/2007 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0114278 STREET - SIGN BLANK FOR FIRE BOAT SIGN
45Page:
Packet Page 101 of 302
05/31/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
1:39:12PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
96751 5/31/2007 (Continued)051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
STREET - SIGN BLANK FOR FIRE BOAT SIGN
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 46.10
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 20.98
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.90
Total :72.98
Bank total :234,953.60137 Vouchers for bank code :front
234,953.60Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report137
46Page:
Packet Page 102 of 302
AM-1004 2.D.
Claims for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Cliff Sanderlin (amount undetermined), and
Philip Laue (amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages.
Previous Council Action
Not applicable.
Narrative
Cliff Sanderlin
10522 235th Place SW
Edmonds, WA 98020-5732
(Amount Undetermined)
Philip Laue
C/O Goertz & Lambrecht
536 Bell Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
(Amount Undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Sanderlin Claim for Damages
Link: Laue Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 03:13 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/29/2007 03:15 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 03:17 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda Started On: 05/18/2007 03:14
Packet Page 103 of 302
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 05/18/2007 03:14
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/29/2007
Packet Page 104 of 302
Packet Page 105 of 302
Packet Page 106 of 302
Packet Page 107 of 302
Packet Page 108 of 302
AM-1001 2.E.
Shell Valley Emergency Access
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:Consent
Department:Development Services Type:
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Authorization to proceed with selection of a consultant to design the Shell Valley Emergency
Access and preliminary short subdivision.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council authorize Staff to proceed with selection of a consultant to design the Shell Valley
Emergency Access and preliminary short subdivision using the funds included in the 2007 Fund
112 Capital Budget for right-of-way (ROW) stabilization projects.
Previous Council Action
On February 13, 2007 the Community Services/Development Services (CS/DS) Committee
decided to forward the Shell Valley Emergency Access project to the full Council with a
recommendation that the project be added to the 2007-2013 CIP and the 2007-2008 Capital
Budget, with design in 2007 (using the $50,000 budgeted for ROW stabilization) and construction
in 2009, with an option to construct it in 2008 if funding can be appropriated.
On April 17, 2007, Council adopted the 2007-2013 CIP which includes $50,000 in Fund 112 in
2007 for design (instead of $50,000 for ROW stabilization projects) and $340,000 in Fund 125
(REET2 Transportation Projects) in 2009 for construction this project.
Narrative
The Shell Valley area is accessed only by way of Pioneer Way, which is a very steep and curvy
road. There are 90 dwelling units which utilize Pioneer Way as their access out to Bowdoin Way.
During periods of ice and snow, Pioneer Way becomes impassable, forcing residents to park on
Bowdoin Way and walk down the steep road. This also makes it hard for emergency responders to
handle calls for assistance. There is an unimproved direct road which runs through Yost Park
below the pool and also accesses the Shell Valley area. It is, however, unsafe to use.
Pioneer Way has continued over the years to be extended northward toward Main Street. There is
now only one parcel of land that separates Pioneer Way from Main Street and it is owned by the
City. Please see the aerial photo at Attachment 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Packet Page 109 of 302
Link: Exhibit 1 - Aerial Photo Shell Valley Alternative Access
Link: Exhibit 2 - Shell valley Access Project Description
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 11:22 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/17/2007 02:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/17/2007 02:57 PM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 05/17/2007 09:51
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/17/2007
Packet Page 110 of 302
4 0 0
B
PIO N E E R W A Y
88TH PL W
SHE
LL VALLEY ROAD
209TH PL SW
HILLCREST PL
P A R K R O A D
SHELL PL
MAIN ST
PARK RD
S HELL V
A
L
L
E
Y
W
Y
SUMMIT LN
86TH PL W
PIONEER WY
214T
4
0
0
390
360
370
380
410
3
5
0
340
420
330
4
3
0320
4
4
0
3
1
0
3
0
0
450
2
9
0
370
4
0
0
3 8 0
410
3 9 0
360
3 5 0
4
2
0
Packet Page 111 of 302
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Shell Valley
Bikeway/Walkway/ Emergency Access
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $390,000
2007- $50,000 (Fund 112)
2009- $340,000 (Fund 125-Transportation)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an emergency access road from the Shell Valley
subdivision to Main Street which will serve as a bikeway and walkway as well.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Severe grade of the primary road into the Shell
Valley subdivision results in access problems during winter freezing events. The
proposed access road will provide emergency access for these winter freezing events
and serve as a bicycle/pedestrian path the remainder of the year. The route, with access
through an existing pedestrian tunnel beneath Main Street can continue to Pine Ridge
Park.
SCHEDULE: 2007 design, 2009, construction
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Planning/Study
Engineering & Administration $50,000
Construction $336,600
1% for Art $3,400
TOTAL $50,000 $340,000
Packet Page 112 of 302
AM-1016 2.F.
Draft Guidelines - Candidate Forums and Use of City Facilities
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton
Submitted For:Michael Plunkett Time:Consent
Department:Community Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Draft Guidelines - Candidate Forums and Use of City Facilities.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
No recommendation as this item is a policy related decision for the City Council.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
During the March 23-24, 2007 City Council Retreat, a brief discussion took place regarding past
candidate debates. The Council agreed that it was time to establish policies or guidelines relating
to conducting candidate debates or forums within City owned facilities. The attached document
contains draft guidelines for review and possible approval by the City Council.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 05/31/2007 03:29 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/31/2007 03:36 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 05/31/2007 03:39 PM APRV
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 05/31/2007 02:15
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/31/2007
Packet Page 113 of 302
Draft Guidelines
Candidate Forums
Use of City Facilities
Although public buildings have traditionally been considered facilities that serve
as public forums, State law prohibits the use of public property for partisan
purposes--that is to promote or oppose a candidate or ballot proposition. For
this reason, the City’s web site and PEG Channel 21 have rules that limit their
use. They are, however, legitimate public forums that have been opened for use
and application of rules that need to be content neutral.
The relevant rules regarding use of these are as follows:
1) The user must be a civic (or other) organization with an established
relationship with the City;
2) The use must have a civic or public purpose; and
3) The use must be neutral and informational. That is, not oriented to the
promotion/opposition of a candidate or ballot measure.
As examples of the above, the South County Senior Center and Greater Edmonds
Chamber of Commerce are civic organizations with established relationships with
the city. Conducting candidate forums are uses similar to those permitted
several times in the past (along with use of the council chambers) by the
Chamber of Commerce.
If an entity wishes to conduct a candidate forum within a public facility, e.g., City
Council Chambers, Edmonds Library, City Hall Bracket Meeting Room, etc., the
following guidelines have been established to ensure that proper protocol is
followed:
• If a sponsoring entity wishes to host a candidate forum in a City facility,
e.g., City Council Chambers, the sponsoring entity is responsible for
setting the time and date. Sponsors must first contact the City to
determine whether a room is available for use. Room reservations
must be submitted/requested at least 30 days prior to an event, which
may take place no later than 30 days prior to an election.
• If the sponsor wants to record and broadcast a forum, the City requires
the sponsor to pay for all services necessary to host the event, e.g.,
staff salaries, operating equipment, overhead charges, security, etc.
• Candidate forums or debates must be open to all candidates for any
particular position.
• Ground rules used by an entity promoting a forum or debate must
appear to be informational, neutral and evenly applied.
• Application of policies must be content neutral.
Packet Page 114 of 302
• Candidates who have questions, problems or issues with the ground
rules need to take the issues up with sponsors of a candidate
forum/debate
NOTE: Guidelines contained in this document are intended to provide guidance
for Candidate forum/debate sponsors in addition to defining the City’s (and
administration's) role in enabling the hosting and broadcasting of campaign
forums.
Packet Page 115 of 302
AM-1013 2.G.
Vacating Certain Unopened Right-of-Way of 8th Avenue North
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance vacating certain unopened right-of-way of 8th Avenue North, north of
Sprague Street, and reserving an easement.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
Council held a public hearing on October 28, 2005, and approved the proposed street vacation. The
Council approved a resolution stating its intent to vacate the right-of-way on May 8, 2007.
Narrative
The City Attorney has prepared an ordinance finalizing a street vacation of unopened right-of-way
that was the subject of a public hearing by the City Council in October, 2005. The applicants have
paid the required amount of money ($7,500) set by the Council to conclude the street vacation. The
ordinance approving the vacation is attached as Exhibit 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2: Scott Snyder memo
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 05/30/2007 09:41 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/30/2007 10:08 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/30/2007 10:09 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/30/2007 03:21 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 05/30/2007 08:39
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/30/2007
Packet Page 116 of 302
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
4/18/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, VACATING CERTAIN UNOPENED RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF 8TH AVENUE NORTH, NORTH OF SPRAGUE
STREET, RESERVING AN EASEMENT, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, following a public hearing and the procedures set forth in Chapter
20.70 ECDC, the City Council passed a resolution of intent to vacate certain unopened right-of-
way of 8th Avenue North, north of Sprague Street in the City of Edmonds, upon the fulfillment
of certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised the City Council that on such condition,
the payment of the sum of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) was met within the
ninety (90) day period set in the resolution; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The unopened right-of-way of 8th Avenue North, north of Sprague
Street as shown on the attached Exhibit A, be and is hereby vacated, subject to the reservation of
an easement thirty (30) feet in width that is 15 feet on each side of the centerline of Shell Creek
as it lies within the vacated right-of-way easement, said easement to be reserved for construction,
maintenance, erosion control, removal of vegetation and other maintenance activities such as the
piling of dirt and debris in the operation of vehicles, the passage of workmen, and other activities
{WSS658653.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 117 of 302
related to construction, reconstruction or maintenance of the adjacent Shell Creek as a drainage
way of the City.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to forward a certified copy of this
ordinance to the applicant for recording in the land records of Snohomish County.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS658653.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 118 of 302
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, VACATING CERTAIN
UNOPENED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 8TH AVENUE NORTH, NORTH OF SPRAGUE
STREET, RESERVING AN EASEMENT, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS658653.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 -
Packet Page 119 of 302
Exhibit A
Packet Page 120 of 302
A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide
1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 • Seattle, WA 98101-1686 • 206.447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 • Web:
www.omwlaw.com
{WSS658656.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 18, 2007
TO: Edmonds City Council
Sandra Chase, City Clerk
David Gebert, City Engineer
City of Edmonds
FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney
RE: 8th Avenue North, North of Sprague
Attached is the resolution of intent to vacate and an ordinance vacating the portion of 8th Avenue
North, north of Sprague Street, which was addressed at the City Council’s hearing of October 18,
2005. The resolution would be appropriate for a Consent Agenda. The ordinance should be
placed on a Consent Agenda when Ms. Chase confirms that the $7,500 cost was paid within the
90-day period established by ECDC 20.70.140.
WSS:gjz
Attachments
Packet Page 121 of 302
AM-1009 2.H.
Amend City Code - Licensed Massage Therapists Fees
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds City Code, Section 4.50.040 Fees -
Disbursements, paragraph (D), relating to the registration of Licensed Massage Therapists.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
City Attorney Scott Snyder advises that in the last legislative session, House Bill 1341 prohibited
cities from acquiring any additional registration of Licensed Massage Therapists.
In reviewing the Edmonds City Code, Mr. Snyder noted that Chapter 4.50 provides for the
licensing of massage parlors, bath houses, etc., and not for Licensed Massage Therapists. ECC
4.50.040(D) could be interpreted as imposing a fee on Licensed Massage Therapists.
The attached proposed ordinance amends the Code to bring it into compliance with State law.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: City Attorney Memo
Link: Ordinance
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 09:42 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/29/2007 11:37 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 01:27 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/29/2007 09:39
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/29/2007
Packet Page 122 of 302
Packet Page 123 of 302
A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide
1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 • Seattle, WA 98101-1686 • 206.447.7000 • Fax: 206.447.0215 • Web: www.omwlaw.com
{WSS660921.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 8, 2007
TO: Sandra Chase, City Clerk
City of Edmonds
FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney
RE: Licensed Massage Therapists
You will shortly be receiving a copy of our Legislative Summaries for the last legislative session.
In them, you will find a discussion of House Bill 1341. This measure prohibited cities from
acquiring any additional registration of licensed massage therapists. You will note that Chapter
4.50 of the Edmonds City Code provides for the licensing of massage parlors, bath houses, etc.,
and not for licensed massage therapists. ECC 4.50.040(D) could be interpreted as imposing a fee
on LMTs and their registration. I am attaching an ordinance which amends it to bring it into
compliance with State law.
WSS:gjz
Attachment
Packet Page 124 of 302
{WSS660919.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
5/8/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE, SECTION 4.50.040 FEES -
DISBURSEMENTS, PARAGRAPH (D) RELATING TO THE
REGISTRATION OF LICENSED MASSAGE THERAPISTS,
AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature has amended the provisions of RCW
18.108.210 to prohibit municipalities from acquiring any additional fees or registrations of
massage therapists licensed pursuant to the provisions of the chapter, and
WHEREAS, City Code currently exempts licensed massage therapists from
licensing but does provide for a nominal license fee and registration, and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance should be amended in
order to bring it in line with the requirements of State Statute, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Code Section 4.50.040 Fees - Disbursements,
paragraph D. relating to the registration of licensed massage therapists, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
4.50.040 Fees - Disbursements.
. . .
D. Any massage parlor or other business within the City
offering massage services and which employs for the purposes of
massage, only massage therapists licensed in accordance with the
Packet Page 125 of 302
{WSS660919.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
provisions of Chapter 18.108 RCW as a licensed massage therapist
shall be exempt from the provisions of this Chapter. No massage
therapist licensed pursuant to Chapter 18.108 RCW shall be
required to register or pay any fee pursuant to this Chapter other
than nondiscriminatory business license fees applied to all business
entities within the City. The Police Chief and/or City Clerk are
authorized to accept a photocopy of the state license in lieu of the
provisions of this Chapter or the requirements of ECC
4.50.050(A)(8). No massage therapist licensed pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 18.108 RCW shall be required to register
with the City and these provisions relate only to the establishment
of the right of such individual for exemption from the statute.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 126 of 302
{WSS660919.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, SECTION 4.50.040 FEES -
DISBURSEMENTS, PARAGRAPH (D) RELATING TO THE REGISTRATION OF
LICENSED MASSAGE THERAPISTS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 127 of 302
AM-950 3.
Annual Report from the Sister City Commission
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Brian McIntosh Time:15 Minutes
Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
2006 Annual Report from the Edmonds Sister City Commission.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Accept Annual Report.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
2006 Commission Chair Shiva Riddell and Commissioner Jim Corbett will present the 2006
Annual Report.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Sister City Annual Report 2006
Link: Sister City Annual Report 2006
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/19/2007 10:02 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/19/2007 04:12 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/20/2007 08:09 AM APRV
Form Started By: Brian
McIntosh
Started On: 04/19/2007 08:52
AM
Final Approval Date: 04/20/2007
Packet Page 128 of 302
Edmonds Sister City commission
2006 Annual Report
The Mission of the Sister City Commission is “to promote communication and
understanding through exchanges of people, ideas, and culture”. The twelve member
Commission strives to fulfill this mission each year. The Commission continues to
provide activities and exchanges that foster understanding and friendship between
Edmonds and its Sister City, Hekinan, Japan. The members of the Edmonds Sister City
Commission express their sincere thanks to the many individuals, families, businesses,
schools and organizations that have provided of their time and resources to help make
these programs successful.
2006 was a very successful and exciting year for the Commission.
Commissioners
The Executive members of the commission for 2006 included:
Shiva Riddell - Chair
Felix de Mello - Vice Chair
Jeanne Mazzoni - Secretary
Rita Bailey Ikeda - Treasurer
Bryan Bechler, Jim Corbett, Lawrence Cretin, Holly Guentz, Grant Linden, Iyoko
Okano,Vera Papgeorgiou, and Karen Towey.
2006 saw the departure of Commissioners Consuelo Kinahan and Karen Towey.
2006 saw the addition of Commissioners Grant Linden and Holly Guentz.
Sister City Liaison
Brian McIntosh: Director, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department. I would
like to recognize Brian at this time for his continued support and guidance.
Community Outreach
Shinto Shrine visit: Commissioners visited the shrine located in eastern Snohomish
County in April and met with the first Caucasian Priest in North America
Packet Page 129 of 302
Edmonds Summer Market: Commissioners set up an information booth at the Edmonds
Summer Market and promoted the Sister City Program.
Senior Kiwanis Meeting attended by Commissioner Bryan Bechler to familiarize the
Kiwanis with the Sister City program.
The Sister City was represented by Commissioner Jim Corbett at the Washington State
Ethnic Heritage Conference.
Gallery North featured artist John Vanderbrooke: Commissioners Rita Bailey and Vera
Papageorgiou invited Mr. Vanderbrooke to work with wax medium with the visiting
Japanese students. Mr. Vanderbrooke offered his time and arranged a very entertaining
and creative art morning.
Meito Shodokai: A major Japanese calligraphy exhibit took place at the Seattle Center.
Commissioner Iyoko Okano was one of the organizers of the event. Commissioners
Grant Linden and Shiva Riddell, Darlene McLellan of the Edmonds Arts Festival
Foundation, Mary Monfort of Edmonds Arts Commission, and Sister City Liaison Brian
McIntosh attended this event. Commissioner Okano’s excellent calligraphy was part of
the exhibit. Her work has won awards in Tokyo’s exhibitions.
Student Delegation to Hekinan- July
Chaperones Joan Stern and Patty Steele-Smith were selected from 16 applicants.
Commissioner Jeanne Mazzoni screened applicants and a 3 person team interviewed and
selected the chaperones. 15, 14-17 year old students and their chaperones traveled for 15
days in July and stayed with host families. As usual they were treated to the best of
Japanese hospitality. Our students planned a cooperative American Farewell dinner and
party for their hosts.
Student Delegation from Hekinan - August
The Commission arranged home stays for 15 students and two chaperones from Hekinan
for two weeks in early August. The Commissioners offered many hours of volunteer
time to provide daily tours and activities for these students. The host families also gave
generously of their time to the students during the evenings and on the weekends. Our
own Commissioner Jim Corbett was available everyday to help with driving the students.
Soon after their arrival, Sister City Commission invited the students and their host
families to a welcome party. We also invited the American students who had just
returned from Japan to attend the party. It is an occasion to establish lasting friendships
and commradery. The Farewell Party is planned and prepared by the Japanese students
who shopped and prepared an outstanding feast for their hosts and the Commissioners.
We were then entertained with traditional songs and dances, origami, calligraphy, and
Japanese games. We are always in need of more hosts, so please consider sharing your
home and culture with our guests.
Packet Page 130 of 302
Adult Delegation from Hekinan- October
A 12 member adult delegation visited Edmonds in October. Delegates stayed with host
families as well as at the Harbor Inn. A reception was hosted by the Sister City
Commission for the delegates and their host families. Mayor Gary Haakenson and his
wife Dolly, Police Chief David Stern and his wife Darlene, and Council President
Deanna Dawson attended the reception. Activities during the delegates stay included
visits to the Boeing Everett Factory, smoked salmon factory, Edmonds Police Station,
Edmonds Fire Station 17, Halloween at City Hall and a hosted event at the home of Arts
Commissioner Rich Bader and his wife Donna.
Newsletter
Commissioner Jim Corbett is in charge of our Sister City newsletter. He has done an
outstanding job of producing quarterly newsletters mailed to our membership.
Hekinan/Edmonds Cooperative Student Art Project
Student trip chaperone Patti Steele-Smith coordinated the student cooperative art project
this year. The theme was an “east meets west” creating three artifacts collages using
small items and objects representing the northwest, the Hekinan region, and a
combination in three shadow boxes.
Assistant English Teachers (AET)
Mariko Watts and Michael Hopkins were interviewed and selected from a pool of 14
applicants to work as assistant English teachers in Junior high schools for a period of two
years. Reports from Hekinan indicate the Mariko and Mike are working hard in the
Hekinan middle school system and representing the City of Edmonds well in their dual
roles of teachers and ambassadors.
2008 marks SCC 20th Anniversary
Adult delegation to Japan April of 2008
The Sister City Commission extends its appreciation to Mayor Haakenson, the City
Council, the Edmonds Arts Commission and all City Departments for their continued
support of the Commission’s cultural programs and activities.
Respectfully submitted,
Shiva Riddell, 2006 chair
Edmonds sister City Commission
Packet Page 131 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 1
Edmonds Sister City
Commission
Annual Report 2006
By Shiva Riddle
Packet Page 132 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 2
Commissioners
Shiva Riddell - Chair
Felix de Mello -Vice Chair
Jeanne Mazzoni - Secretary
Rita Bailey - Treasurer
Bryan Bechler Jim Corbett
Lawrence Cretin Holly Guentz
Grant Linden Iyoko Okano
Vera Papagerorgiou Karen Towey
Packet Page 133 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 3
Sister City Liaison
Packet Page 134 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 4
Community Outreach
• Shinto Shrine Visit
• Edmonds Summer Market
• Senior Kiwanis Meeting
• Ethnic Heritage Conference
• Gallery North Featured Artist John
Vanderbrooke
Packet Page 135 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 5
Shinto Shrine Visit
Packet Page 136 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 6
Edmonds Summer Market
Packet Page 137 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 7
Senior Kiwanis Meeting
Packet Page 138 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 8
Ethnic Heritage Conference
Packet Page 139 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 9
John Vanderbrooke
Packet Page 140 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 10
Meito Shodokai
Packet Page 141 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 11
Hekinan Student Delegation
August 2006
Packet Page 142 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 12
Hekinan Adult Delegation
October 2006
Packet Page 143 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 13
NewsletterNewsletter
Packet Page 144 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 14
Hekinan & Edmonds
Cooperative Student Art
Project
Packet Page 145 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 15
Assistant English Teachers
(AET)
Packet Page 146 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 16
2008 Marks Sister City
Commissions 20th Anniversary
Packet Page 147 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 17
Adult Delegation to Japan
April, 2008
Packet Page 148 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 18
•Thank You For Your
Support
Packet Page 149 of 302
4/19/2007 www.brainybetty.com 19Packet Page 150 of 302
AM-1014 4.
Proposed 75th/76th Avenue Walkway and 162nd Street Park
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Don Fiene Time:20 Minutes
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Presentation regarding proposed 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway and 162nd
Street SW Park.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Staff is seeking Council concurrence with Staff recommendation regarding the preferred
alternatives for the Walkway and the Park projects for which to proceed with final design.
Previous Council Action
Council authorized the Mayor to sign the professional services agreement with Gray & Osborne,
Inc. on September 25, 2006.
Narrative
The 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway project and the 162nd Street SW Park project
are both budgeted for 2007-2008. Gray & Osborne, Inc. was chosen for design of both the
walkway project and the park project. The initial contract award was for the alternative analysis
and the preliminary design phase of the project.
The alternative analysis and preliminary design phase is now complete. The consultant analyzed
two different alternatives for walkway design as well as a couple of park design alternatives. Issues
that were examined during the preliminary study included sensitive slopes and limited right-of-way
along the corridor in the Meadowdale neighborhood.
A public meeting was held regarding the proposed walkway and park on April 26, 2007. All
citizens along the proposed walkway corridor were sent individual invitations to the meeting, and it
was well attended. At the meeting, staff and the consultant received feedback regarding the
concepts proposed and will incorporate citizen suggestions into the final design as practical.
This evening, the consultant will present the alternatives that were analyzed and will explain the
rationale for the preferred alternative. It is anticipated that there will be a contract addendum for
the final design phase of the project.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Packet Page 151 of 302
Attachments
Link: 76th/75th CIP Description
Link: 162nd Park CIP Description
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 05/30/2007 01:19 PM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 05/30/2007 02:22 PM APRV
3 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 05/30/2007 02:54 PM APRV
4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/30/2007 03:19 PM APRV
5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/30/2007 07:44 PM APRV
6 Final Approval Linda Hynd 05/31/2007 03:39 PM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 05/30/2007 11:36
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/31/2007
Packet Page 152 of 302
Packet Page 153 of 302
Packet Page 154 of 302
AM-1012 5.
Rezone for Properties Located on the West Side of Sunset Ave N
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Rob Chave Time:10 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Closed Record Review on the rezone from Single-Family Residential (RS-6) to Office
Residential (OR) for properties located on the west side of Sunset Ave. N. and south of Bell
St. This is an administrative rezone initiated by the City of Edmonds to bring the zoning of
these properties into conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. (File No. R-07-14).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the rezone request and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for Council
adoption.
Previous Council Action
In 2005, the City Council designated the subject properties as Planned Residential-Office. The City
Council adopted the current version of the OR zone into the Edmonds Community Development
Code (ECDC) in December, 2006.
Narrative
The Planning Board recommended that the City Council approve the change in zoning for the
subject properties (see Exhibit 1 for Planning Board discussion and reasoning). This is an
administrative rezone of properties designated in the Comprehensive Plan for "Planned
Residential-Office" use. The "OR - Office Residential" zone is specifically intended to be applied
to properties designated for this use.
In addition to the parties of record noted on page 6 of the staff report (see Exhibit 2), Mr. Harold
Huston was added as a party of record during the Planning Board public hearing.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Planning Board meeting transcript
Link: Exhibit 2: Planning Board staff report
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 04:58 PM APRV
Packet Page 155 of 302
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/29/2007 05:00 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 05:01 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 05/29/2007 04:31
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/29/2007
Packet Page 156 of 302
CITY OF EDMONDS
VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS OF PLANNING BOARD HEARING
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007
Chair Guenther: Moving on to Item 6, public hearing on the rezone of single-family residential (RS-6) to office residential
(OR) for properties located on the west side of Sunset Avenue and south of Bell Street. This is an administrative rezone
initiated by the City of Edmonds to bring zoning of the properties into conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. File
Number R-07-14. Take it away, Rob.
Mr. Chave: This is an administrative rezone by the City. It basically follows up on several actions that were previously
done that I am sure you are familiar with. The first action was amending the Comprehensive Plan back in 2004 and 2005.
One of the focuses was on the Downtown Plan. At that time, this particular area highlighted on the map that’s in your packet
is or was designated for this new designation, which is the residential office. At that time, there was a fair amount of
discussion and logic in the Comprehensive Plan about why that area needed a particularly designation. A number of other
areas downtown were also re-designated. The overall thrust was to identify specific areas that needed to be dealt with in a
more specific way than traditionally had been done downtown, and this was one of those.
Mr. Chave: Following up on that, the City actually created a zone to implement the Comprehensive Plan direction for
downtown. This was also done for some of the other downtown area, like the BD or downtown business zones that were
applied elsewhere downtown. But there was a specific OR zone that was create here. Actually, the initial zone that was
created was the MPOR, master planned office residential. The Council basically after they had adopted it had second
thoughts and referred it back to the Planning Board for consideration again. Ultimately, the Board here recommended some
changes back to the Council that were adopted so that the old MPOR zone actually became an OR zone. At this point, and it
was actually specifically, it’s included in your packet, it was specifically noted in the purposes that it was intended to be
applied in this area. So at this point, you had a Comprehensive Plan that was updated to call out this area. You have a
specific zone that was also tailored for this area to implement the plan direction. Given those two facts, there’s really not
much choice for the zoning that actually should be applied here.
Mr. Chave: This action is really to bring the properties into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Looking at the
zoning map right now, the properties are RS-6. Under this action, it would be changed to OR and the zoning map would be
amended in that way. We’ve got some detailed analysis in the staff report that goes through the various criteria for a rezone.
It also talks about general direction in the Downtown Plan and why we think it makes sense based on that discussion, as well.
So all those criteria are contained in your report. I’m not going to go through them unless you have questions about them. At
this point, if you have any questions, great. Otherwise, we can go to the public hearing.
Chair Guenther: So Rob, it was an MPOR zone?
Mr. Chave: There was an MPOR zone that was created in the code. You folks had recommended that, and it had some
master plan provisions and that sort of thing. It talked about, I think, going up 25 feet above the street level, you know, some
provisions like that. I think the Council had some concerns about that and ultimately referred it, put a moratorium on
applying that MPOR zone anywhere while the Planning Board reconsidered or made some new recommendations.
Remember out of that process you actually changed a number of the provisions, simplified it somewhat, went with the
traditional height calculation method, which was 25 feet above average level. Ultimately, those changes were adopted by the
Council. When they did it, they actually changed the name of the zone from MPOR to OR.
Packet Page 157 of 302
Chair Guenther: All right, so it’s the MPOR changed to OR. But it hasn’t been applied to this . . .
Mr. Chave: It has not been applied anywhere yet.
Chair Guenther: But we have the zone that’s been approved, so we’re just . . .
Mr. Chave: It’s in the code and available to be applied.
Chair Guenther: All right. So our task tonight is to approve this.
Mr. Chave: From the staff’s perspective, we view it as sort of closing the circle.
Board Member Works: Is there still a moratorium?
Mr. Chave: No. Once the OR zone was adopted in the code, the moratorium went away.
Vice Chair Dewhirst: Can you refresh my memory. I don’t remember, what’s the density in this OR zone.
Mr. Chave: Basically, it’s controlled by the bulk and setbacks. There’s no density factor. It’s simply how many units you
choose to place and you can provide parking for given the limitations in the zone.
Vice Chair Dewhirst: Is that also for the single-family both and the multi-family. I mean it can be worked out either way.
You could have a series of small single-family houses on there? There’s no minimum lot size?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, I suppose that would be true, but again, you would have to provide parking and setbacks, and so forth.
Board Member Freeman: Rob, I think there might be a typo on Page 4, B analysis 1. It says planned residential office, and
then it still got the properties on the west side of Sunset, they can be existing commercial zoning on Edmonds Street. Isn’t
that Bell Street there?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, it should say Bell Street.
Board Member Freeman: Okay.
Mr. Chave: Basically, one you get north of Bell and Sunset, there is no room for development there.
Board Member Young: Refresh my memory on the height calculation. It’s going to be the same as it is throughout
Edmonds?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, no different.
Board Member Young: The four corners of the smallest rectangle, averaged, 25 feet above that?
Mr. Chave: That’s correct.
Board Member Freeman: And this was the agreement worked out by the neighbors, wasn’t it?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, the property owners and neighbors basically were all in agreement that this made an appropriate
transition.
Board Member Freeman: Yeah, and nothing’s changed from that, then that we heard last time.
Mr. Chave: Not that I know of, and I don’t see any of the owners or direct neighbors here. Presumably, since they received
notice, they are still in support. We also did not receive any comment letters either pro or con.
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007 Page 2
Packet Page 158 of 302
Chair Guenther: Any other questions? All right. Staff is the applicant. This is now open for public testimony for all those
who wish to speak for or against this proposed rezone.
Mr. Huston: Harold Huston, and I live at 111 Main Street, the Main Street Plaza. First I would like to commend you for
volunteering and serving on this very, very important board for the City of Edmonds. Having been a volunteer myself for the
past 16 years in Edmonds, I know what it is to serve our City, and I think all of us have the same goal. To make a better City
for our children, our grandchildren and on down the line.
Mr. Huston: I appeared before the City Council last year, and Rob could you put that first map up, please. Thank you. And
I made a request to the City Council when they were rezoning, if you will look, you did a transition on the east side. I
requested and suggested to the City Council that I think you should have a transition both on the east and the west side, and
that would affect the one parcel right next to Rory’s on the west side there where you go from the R-6 housing single housing
to the commercial in downtown mixed commercial. I thought that the section there should read east and west side of Sunset.
I thought that would kind of clean up the plan and would be a lot more on the transition, the transition would clean that up
there on that. I got a unanimous vote out of the City Council; with the understanding they were going to have Rob refer that
to the Planning Board this year for your consideration. I would really appreciate if that can be considered. If that stays now
like it is and a developer comes in there on a downtown mixed commercial, that will completely wipe out our view on the
Main Street Plaza there. I think you need a transitional area between single-family housing and the mixed commercial. That
would pretty much take care of it and that would clean it up like you have done it on the west side of that road. I really
appreciate your consideration.
Mr. Huston: One other thing, I have been on the Edmonds Police Foundation for the past 12 years. I served with Tom
Miller and then Rob Hickock. We’ve lost our chief of police, and I would ask that maybe you could adjourn your meeting
today in respect and in memory of Chief David Stern. I would appreciate that also. If anybody has any questions on my
request, I would be happy to answer.
Board Member Works: I’m not clear exactly which property you are talking about now. Could you point to that?
Mr. Huston: Can you point to that, Rob, with the pointer? Right there.
Board Member Works: That’s what I thought.
Mr. Huston: Like I say, that would give you a transitional between the commercial, mixed commercial, and the R-6 housing
on the west side of the street. That would clean that up there.
Mr. Chave: Before you go further. The Council, during Comprehensive Plan discussions last year I think, Mr. Huston made
a request that the Council refer the issue he’s talking about to the Planning Board for consideration this next year, which is
2007. So that’s no something you’re looking at tonight. He’s talking about a Comprehensive Plan amendment that you’ll
potentially be discussing later on in the year that the Council referred to the Board. But it’s really not something that you can
deal with at this point in time.
Board Member Reed: And the suggestion is to change that lot to OR?
Mr. Huston: Yes sir.
Mr. Chave: Again, it’s not something you are going to want to get into tonight.
Board Member Reed: No, I realize it’s not tonight. I just wanted to make sure I understand what you are saying.
Mr. Huston: I just wanted to come up and thank you for the work you’re doing and talk to all the neighbors that live in that
Main Street Plaza there. We would just like your consideration on that. We have a very expensive property there. We’ve
put our savings in there.
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007 Page 3
Packet Page 159 of 302
Mr. Chave: Procedurally, you don’t want to go there tonight.
Mr. Huston: No. I just wanted to . . .
Mr. Chave: This is a hearing just on this one.
Mr. Huston: I realize that, and I just wanted to get acquainted and let you know I’m sitting here, okay. I want to thank you
for your time.
Chair Guenther: So Rob, that issue will be coming up later this year?
Mr. Chave: Yeah, that’s something you’ll have discussion and potentially a hearing on later in the year when you are
looking at the Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Chair Guenther: Okay. Anybody else from the audience who would like to testify tonight? Any other comments from
you, Rob, regarding our public testimony?
Mr. Chave: Not unless you have questions.
Board Member Young: Just as sort of a technical clarification thing. Let’s assume for the moment we are going to approve
this. I don’t really see any reason why not. What is going to be the net difference in the amount of residential development
capability? I mean, right now, you have three, I guess, 6,000 square foot lots, each for a single-family home. If we rezone
this, what, I mean how many condos on top of offices or vice versa are we going to get potentially.
Mr. Chave: Honestly, I can’t tell you because it’s going to depend on what the height is on each building and how they gain
access, provide parking and so forth. If you look at one of the figures, one of the maps we gave you, there are some
challenges with developing the properties because of the topography change. So it really is going to depend lot by lot, I
think, number one on how their topography works, how the building height and bulk work. To some extent, some of the
properties are already developed, the two northern ones. Another question would be whether they choose to continue those
or ultimately redevelop at some point.
Board Member Young: But there won’t be a net loss?
Mr. Chave: No.
Board Member Young: The worse it will be is the number of residences neutral.
Mr. Chave: No, you can be confident there will be an increase in, you know, the potential number of residential units, I
think. In fact, we have had a pre-application meeting with someone on the southern property in this area, the portion that’s
undeveloped. Apparently, they’re buying it potentially from the current owner, Mr. Drew, and are interested in developing a
multi-family, with a small office space.
Board Member Young: I just wanted to make sure that we had that on the record for the benefit of the Growth
Management Act review, that we’re not losing housing stock here. Although it’s hardly going to qualify as, you know
affordable, but . . .
Board Member Reed: Are these non-conforming lots, Rob?
Mr. Chave: Yes.
Board Member Reed: My only measuring tool I have is the tip of my pen, but it almost looks like they’re not even, the two
on the north don’t look like 6,000 square feet, and the other one is one large lot which probably is not.
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007 Page 4
Packet Page 160 of 302
Mr. Chave: The overall size of the entire property is about 6/10 of an acre, which is about roughly 24,000 and change. So I
would be pretty confident that the northern ones could be under 6,000 since the lot depth is diminishing as you head north.
So they could be under six, but I can’t tell you because we haven’t measured.
Board Member Young: So they are kind of too small for RS-6 anyway?
Mr. Chave: Well, there’s a house on one. I mean, it was built quite some time ago, and the other one actually has a multi-
family structure. So they have managed to actually build viable structures on those properties. Are they non-conforming?
Yeah, the multi-family one definitely is on the northern most property, and it is possible, but again we haven’t analyzed it,
whether that second lot that has the single-family house on it, it could also be non-conforming. But I can’t verify that.
Board Member Reed: So then on redevelopment, those percentages in this other document that we’ve dealt with would
take effect, right. If it was a non-conforming lot, but it was an RS-6, then you would have to have, I can’t remember the
percentage, 80% of 6,000.
Mr. Chave: They’re constrained right now in terms of what they can do with the property. The new OR zone could give
them a little more flexibility.
Board Member Reed: Okay.
Board Member Freeman: The maximum height has already been determined, hasn’t it? You said it depends something on
height.
Mr. Chave: What I was trying to get at is for each individual lot, there’s going to be an interaction between the topography
and what the actual average grade measured height of the building can be. That’s going to be probably the most significant
constraint, that plus access, as to how they develop any given site.
Board Member Freeman: But they’ll still have the setbacks that we’ve already determined and the regular way of
measuring the height, from the four corners.
Mr. Chave: Yeah, I would say because of the topography, in general, you’re going to find these buildings significantly
lower than potentially what could be built east of Sunset.
Board Member Freeman: It might even be lower than they are now. The one on the northern part, that quad-plex, that
probably if it were rebuilt, would be lower, wouldn’t it because it would have the standard 15-foot setback.
Mr. Chave: Yeah, in all probability, yes.
Board Member Freeman: And that doesn’t have any legal parking does it, that one? I don’t think there’s any parking
attached to that now.
Mr. Chave: That I can’t confirm for you.
Board Member Freeman: I think there appears to be.
Chair Guenther: At this time I will close the public hearing and ask for deliberations of our rezone.
Vice Chair Dewhirst: Well, if you are ready, I will make a motion.
Chair Guenther: Anybody like to deliberate first or . . . All right.
Board Member Young: I think we have talked about this a fair amount.
Chair Guenther: I agreed. We have seen this a lot. All right, John, would you like to make a motion.
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007 Page 5
Packet Page 161 of 302
Vice Chair Dewhirst: Okay, I recommend that we send this off to Council with an approval and I base that on the staff
report, the analysis on Page 4 and 5 and conclusions on Page 5 that it’s consistent with the plan, the proposed zoning is
consistent with the purpose of the zoning ordinance, and it’s consistent with the neighborhood. And seeing that there’s been
a series of meetings between the city and neighborhoods and they have come to concur on this proposal, I think it is
appropriate.
Board Member Works: I’ll second that.
Chair Guenther: All in favor say aye.
Board Member Freeman: Can we just have some discussion before.
Chair Guenther: You want discussion.
Board Member Freeman: I think we want to maybe perhaps strengthen some of these reasonings. One of them is
suitability, you know, what do they say, one factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped
compared to this. I think we should say in it how long that southern property has been undeveloped. It’s been like 50 years,
hasn’t it, Rob? It’s been a long time.
Mr. Chave: I think this was testimony in another context in the Comprehensive Plan, as I recall. Mr. Drew indicated that
property has been undeveloped as long as he had owned it, which was, well obviously, it’s undeveloped now. But he had
owned it a long time, many years.
Board Member Freeman: Well, I just think to strengthen what we say, it might be best to get some of these facts into it,
having heard the Council meeting from a week or two ago. I though some things were obvious, but some council members
like things spelled out and the facts right in front of them. So that’s why I am suggestion that anything like this were to
strengthen our reasons for voting for, we should include them.
Board Member Works: Where did you want to put that?
Board Member Freeman: Well, under suitability, I think we should strengthen the facts, that the southern portion hasn’t
been developed for a long time, say it hasn’t been developed . . .
Board Member Works: Ever.
Board Member Freeman: Well, there could have been something on it when we had timber mills or something here, I
don’t know, but not since we’ve had zoning in place, I don’t think it’s been developed. Is that correct, Rob?
Mr. Chave: Say that again.
Board Member Freeman: I don’t think it’s been developed since we’ve had actual zoning place. I don’t know what
happened 100 years ago.
Mr. Chave: That’s pretty much what the statement in that paragraph says. It says the southern most property has not been
developed under the existing RS-6 zoning.
Board Member Freeman: Okay, why don’t we put that in years, too.
Mr. Chave: I can’t give a year number. It’s never been developed.
Board Member Freeman: Okay then.
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007 Page 6
Packet Page 162 of 302
Board Member Reed: By the motion, aren’t we accepting the language on Pages 3 and 4 and 5 and 6, down through where
the technical committee part starts?
Mr. Chave: My understanding is you were basically referencing the three conclusions on Page 5, and those conclusions. . .
Vice Chair Dewhirst: And the analysis on Page 4.
Mr. Chave: Those do reference, like Don says, the analysis.
Board Member Freeman: Well, if you think it’s strong enough, I’ll just back off there. I will be supporting the motion
anyway.
Board Member Young: I think your point is well taken, but John referenced those points in the staff report. So they are
officially part of the record.
Board Member Freeman: Okay.
Board Member Young: I guess, the one that isn’t in there is about, you know, have the conditions changed sufficiently, but
I’m not sure that applies here because this is an administrative rezone, not an application on the part of a new property owner
or prospective property owner.
Mr. Chave: From the staff perspective, that changes discussion under IV, the most significant change is you changed the
Comprehensive Plan. At that point, the City’s zoning has to be consistent with what the plan says.
Chair Guenther: So it’s been moved and seconded. Can we vote now? All in favor say aye.
Board Member Works: Aye
Board Member Reed: Aye
Board Member Henderson: Aye
Board Member Freeman: Aye
Board Member Young: Aye
Board Member Bowman: Aye
Chair Guenther: Aye
Vice Chair Dewhirst: Aye
Chair Guenther: Opposed. None.
I TESTIFY THAT THESE VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
ABILITY TO TRANSCRIBE THE PROCEEDINGS.
__________________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Karin Noyes, Transcriber Date
Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts
File Number R-07-14
April 25, 2007 Page 7
Packet Page 163 of 302
Packet Page 164 of 302
R-2007-14 Sunset OR rezone staff report.doc 2
I. INTRODUCTION
A. APPLICATION
1. Applicant: City of Edmonds.
2. Site Location: (Refer to Attachment 1)
The properties are located on the west side of Sunset Avenue North, south of
Bell Street, with addresses generally between 133 and 137 Sunset. See
Attachment 1 for a location map.
3. Request: Application for a rezone from “Single Family – RS-6” to “OR –
Office Residential” to be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan
designation (see Attachments 1 and 2).
4. Review Process:
a. Rezone - Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a
recommendation to the City Council for final decision.
5. Major Issues:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.40 (REZONES).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Section 20.100.010 (HEARING EXAMINER, PLANNING ADVISORY
BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL REVIEW).
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on Findings of Fact, Analysis, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report,
staff recommends that the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City
Council to APPROVE the request for a rezone from “Single Family – RS-6” to “OR
– Office Residential.”
Packet Page 165 of 302
R-2007-14 Sunset OR rezone staff report.doc 3
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development and Zoning:
a. Facts:
(1) Size and Shape: The area under review consists of approximately
0.6 acres fronting on the west side of Sunset Avenue North (see
Attachments 1 and 2).
(2) Land Use:
The southern-most property is vacant, while the properties to the
north contain a single family home and a multi family
development.
(3) Zoning:
Current zoning of the subject properties is Single Family, RS-6
(see Attachment 1).
2. Neighboring Development and Zoning:
a. Facts:
(1) North: The area to the north, west side of Sunset Ave. N, consists
of a narrow open bluff lying between Sunset Avenue and the
railroad tracks.
(2) East: The area east of Sunset contains a single family
neighborhood running north along Sunset Avenue, zoned RS-6. A
small area of multi family zoning (RM-2.4) is on the west side of
2nd Avenue North.
(3) Southeast and South: Development to the south and southeast is
part of the Downtown Edmonds commercial area, consisting of a
mixture of commercial and multi family uses. This area is zone
predominantly for downtown business (BD2).
B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
1. a. Fact: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on April 11, 2007.
Because this is a non-project action, further environmental review will be
required with any subsequent requests for specific project approvals.
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE
1. ECDC Section 20.40 (Rezones)
a. Facts:
(i) The OR zoning classification is included in Attachment 3 for reference.
(ii) Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.40.010
provides that, at a minimum, the following factors shall be considered
in reviewing an application for a rezone:
(1) Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with
Packet Page 166 of 302
R-2007-14 Sunset OR rezone staff report.doc 4
the Comprehensive Plan; and,
(2) Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the
purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, and whether the proposal is
consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; and,
(3) Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning
change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or
nearby property; and,
(4) Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the
character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy
to justify the rezone: and,
(5) Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically
suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and
under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of
time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the
surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning;
and
(6) Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare
compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the
property owners.
b. Analysis:
(i)Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject
properties for “Planned Residential-Office” use, described as:
“Planned Residential-Office. Several properties lie along the
railroad on the west side of Sunset Ave between existing
commercial zoning and Edmonds Street. This area is
appropriate for small scale development which provides for a
mix of limited office and residential uses which provide a
transition between the more intensive commercial uses along
Main Street and the residential uses along Sunset Ave. Because
the area of this designation is located adjacent to commercial
development to the south, the railroad to the west, and is near
both multiple family and single family residential development,
this area should act as a transition between theses uses. Building
design for this area should be sensitive to the surrounding
commercial, multiple family and single-family character.” [2006
Comprehensive Plan, pg. 37]
(ii)Zoning Ordinance. The purposes of the OR zone are given in ECDC
16.77.000 (see Attachment 3). The purposes clearly state that “The
office-residential (OR) zone is intended to be applied to areas
designated in the comprehensive plan for ‘planned residential-office’
development on the west side of Sunset Avenue south of Bell Street,”
and goes on to describe the intent to allow this area to “act as a
transition between” surrounding uses.
(iii)Surrounding Area. The OR zone was constructed and approved to
provide for small-scale office and residential development that would
Packet Page 167 of 302
R-2007-14 Sunset OR rezone staff report.doc 5
be more flexible in use (acknowledging the adjoining railroad to the
west and commercial uses to the south and southeast) while
maintaining compatibility with nearby single family height and bulk
standards. This was done as a way to address the unique situation of
these properties relative to the surrounding area.
(iv)Changes. The relevant change in City policy direction for this area
occurred with adoption of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan, which
amended the policy and plan designations for this area. In particular,
the subject properties were designated for “Planned Residential-
Office” use, and the policy discussion described and supported that
designation (see discussion under (i), above).
(v)Suitability. The properties in question are consistent with the
descriptions in the existing comprehensive plan designation and in the
proposed OR zoning classification. It is also significant that the
southernmost property has not been developed under the existing RS-6
zoning, and the northernmost property contains a multi family
development that is not consistent with its existing RS-6 zoning. In the
past, inquiries have also been made indicating a desire to add an office
to the existing single family home on the remaining property.
(vi)Value. It is expected that at least some additional value may accrue to
the subject property owners, since some additional flexibility in use
will be available to them. However, additional value will also be added
to the city in general, since infill or redevelopment will add value to
the tax base and assist in helping the city accommodate future growth
beyond the current 2025 planning horizon.
c. Conclusions:
(i) The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation for the subject properties, and with the policies for the
Downtown Activity Center.
(ii) The proposed rezone is consistent with the purposes of the zoning
ordinance.
(iii)Based on the further facts and analysis contained above, planning staff
concludes that the proposal meets all of the criteria for a change in
zoning.
D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1. Comprehensive Plan Policies:
a. Facts:
(i) This site is currently designated “Planned Residential-Office” (see
discussion under C.1.b.(i), above). An excerpt from the Downtown
Waterfront Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan is attached as
Attachment 4.
b. Analysis:
(i) The discussion of the “Planned Residential-Office” district on page 37 of
Packet Page 168 of 302
R-2007-14 Sunset OR rezone staff report.doc 6
the Comprehensive Plan was included in the 2004/2005 update of the
plan. As the discussion indicates, this district anticipates that special
zoning rules will need to be applied to provide for the uses anticipated
while also ensuring neighborhood compatibility.
(ii) The general policies for the downtown waterfront area (pages 33-35 of
Attachment 4) address the overall direction for the area, while not
specifically dealing with the unique characteristics of the subject
properties (this is dealt with in the “districts” discussion, as noted in (i)
above). However, it is clear from the policies that downtown is intended
to encourage a mix of uses (ref. E5, E12) and opportunities for new
development or redevelopment in character with downtown (ref. E6, E8,
E14).
c. Conclusions:
(i) The proposal is consistent with the policy direction in the
Comprehensive Plan, particularly the “Planned Residential-Office”
district designated for the subject properties.
E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
No comments were received from City departments reviewing the proposal.
F. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No letters or written comments were received at the time this report was completed.
III. ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial/Vicinity Map.
2. Comprehensive plan and zoning vicinity maps, and aerial/topographic map.
3. ECDC zoning regulations for OR zone.
4. Comprehensive Plan policies.
V. PARTIES OF RECORD
Donald Drew
P.O. Box 57
Edmonds, WA 98020
Mary Ann Stark
133 Sunset Ave
Edmonds, WA 98026
Jack & Charlene Jacobsen
P.O. box 355
Edmonds, WA 98020
City of Edmonds
Packet Page 169 of 302
Packet Page 170 of 302
Packet Page 171 of 302
(((((((((((((
(((
(((((((((((((((((
(((((((
(((
!
!!
!!!
!!!
!
!
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
2 N D A V E N
A I L R O A D S T
S
±
0 10050
Feet
Zoning Vicinity Map
File R-2007-14
!!!!!!
!
!!!!
!!Rezones
PRD
RS-6
RS-8
RS-10
RS-12
RSW-12
RS-20
RS-MP
RM-3
RM-2.4
RM-1.5
(((BD1
(((BD2
((((((BD3
((((((BD4
((BD5
BP
!!!
!!!BN
BC
CG
CG2
CW
MP1
MP2
MU
!!P
OS
Subject Properties
[BD2]
[RS-6]
[RS-6]
B
ellS
T
M
a
in
S
T
S u ns
et A ve
[RM-2.4]
[RM-3]
[BD2]
Packet Page 172 of 302
M
18
20
22
2 4
2 6
28
30
32
16
12
8
1 4
3
4
6
10
36
4
36
12
14
12
34
16
32
14
16
14
14
14
1 6
16
14
0 100 20050
Feet°
Packet Page 173 of 302
Packet Page 174 of 302
Packet Page 175 of 302
Packet Page 176 of 302
Packet Page 177 of 302
Packet Page 178 of 302
Packet Page 179 of 302
Packet Page 180 of 302
AM-1006 6.
2006 International Building, Fire and Supplemental Code
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:20 Minutes
Department:Development Services Type:Action
Review Committee:Community/Development Services
Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on the adoption of the 2006 International Building, Fire and Supplemental
Code.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance adopting the 2006 International Fire, Building and
Supplemental Codes.
Previous Council Action
On May 8, 2007, there was a joint meeting of the Community Services/Development Services and
Public Safety Committees to review the proposed changes to the 2006 International Fire, building
and supplemental Codes. The committees recommended the matter be forwarded to the full
Council for review at a public hearing.
Narrative
The State Building Code Council has approved State wide adoption of the Building, Fire and
Supplemental construction Codes (effective July 1, 2007). The City needs to formalize the State
adoption of the following:
2006 International Building Code
2006 International Residential Code
2006 International Fire Code
2006 International Mechanical Code
2006 International Fuel Gas Code
2006 Uniform Plumbing Code
2006 State Energy Code
2006 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code
There are no substantive changes to the codes but wording clarifications, grammatical changes, and
cross-refererencing changes have been made and are indicated in red on the attached draft ECDC
Title 19.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - CS/DS & PS 5/8/07 Minutes
Packet Page 181 of 302
Link: Exhibit 1 - CS/DS & PS 5/8/07 Minutes
Link: Exhibit 2 - Proposed Changes to ECDC Title 19
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Fire Department Tom Tomberg 05/29/2007 05:33 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/30/2007 08:38 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/30/2007 09:18 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/30/2007 03:21 PM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 05/29/2007 08:43
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/30/2007
Packet Page 182 of 302
M I N U T E S
Joint Community Service/Development Services - Public Safety Committee Meeting
May 8, 2007
Elected Officials Present: Staff Present:
Peggy Olson, Council President Duane Bowman, Dev. Services Director
Richard Marin, CS/DS Committee Chair Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Deanna Dawson, PS Committee Chair John Westfall, Fire Marshal
Michael Plunkett, PS Committee Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Committee Chairs Marin & Dawson convened the meeting at 6:00 P.M.
A. 2006 International Building, Fire and Supplemental Code Adoption.
Duane Bowman introduced the topic. Jeannine Graf explained the process of adopting the new
codes. She noted that the State Building Code Council has approved State wide adoption of the
Building, Fire and Supplemental construction Codes (effective July 1, 2007). The City needs to
formalize the State adoption of the following:
2006 International Building Code
2006 International Residential Code
2006 International Fire Code
2006 International Mechanical Code
2006 International Fuel Gas Code
2006 Uniform Plumbing Code
2006 State Energy Code
2006 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code
There are no substantive changes to the codes but wording clarifications, grammatical changes, and
cross refererencing changes have been made. The changes were highlighted in the attachment to
the agenda bill. Ms. Graf noted that one change that was included was removal of regulating
rockeries. She explained rockeries are not specifically regulated by the building code and we are no
longer proposing to regulate them with a permit. She noted that they are primarily erosion structures
and not retaining structures. The City will however regulate block walls.
John Westfall discussed the adoption of the International Fire Codes. He noted that with the
adoption of the codes three years ago, there were substantial changes. These new amendments
are relatively minor. He noted one change which deals with regulations governing nightclubs.
Chair Dawson asked if these impact the discussions that are currently taking place regarding the
new type of development of multiple single family homes on single parcels. Mr. Westfall responded
that that is a separate issue and staff could report back to the City Council with a separate response.
Council member Plunkett asked whether this provision would require sprinklers in single family
homes and Mr. Westfall responded that they would not.
Packet Page 183 of 302
CS/DS Committee Minutes
May 8, 2007
Page 2
ACTION: CS/DS – PS Committee endorsed moving the codes for presentation at a Public Hearing
before the full Council.
This ended the joint committee at 6:20 p.m. The Public Safety Committee continued with the
following agenda item.
B. Parking Infraction Penalties.
Gerry Gannon introduced the topic and pointed out that it has been a number of years since the City
has looked at its parking infraction fees. He noted that the City’s parking study that was done a few
years back recommended raising parking fines. He noted that the Downtown Parking Committee
supports the proposed new fines. He had an external review of the proposed language and
adjusted the language in light of the comments made.
ACTION: Recommend approval and directed staff to prepare an ordinance and bring to the City
council for approval on the consent agenda.
The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
2
Packet Page 184 of 302
19-1
Proposed Changes are RED
Title 19
BUILDING CODES
Chapters:
19.00 Building Code........................................................................................2-13
19.05 Residential Building Code.....................................................................14-18
19.10 Building Permits – Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas......19-35
19.15 Mechanical Code and Fuel Gas Code....................................................36-37
19.20 Plumbing Code.......................................................................................38-39
19.25 Fire Code................................................................................................40-47
19.30 Energy Code...........................................................................................48
19.35 Ventilation Code....................................................................................49
19.40 Dangerous Buildings Code....................................................................50
19.45 Housing Code.........................................................................................51
19.50 Historic Building Code..........................................................................52-53
19.55 Electrical Code.......................................................................................54
19.60 Moving Buildings..................................................................................55-56
19.65 Marinas ..................................................................................................57-58
19.70 Fees........................................................................................................59-60
19.75 Street Names and Address Numbering..................................................61-62
19.80 Board of Appeals...................................................................................63-68
19.85 Penalties.................................................................................................69
19.90 Limitation of Benefited and Protected Classes......................................70
19.95 Conversion Condominiums ...................................................................71-73
Packet Page 185 of 302
19-2
Chapter 19.00
BUILDING CODE
Sections:
19.00.000 International Building Code adopted.
19.00.005 Section amendments.
19.00.010 Work exempt from permit.
19.00.015 Fully complete application.
19.00.020 Concurrent review.
19.00.025 Architectural design review – Optional vesting.
19.00.030 Demolition permits.
19.00.000 International Building Code adopted.
A. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.027, 19.27.074, and RCW 70.92 the 2006
Edition of the International Building Code (IBC) as published by the International Code Council
(ICC), including the state amendments set forth in RCW 34.05 and Chapter 51-50 WAC, including
the following appendices: E (Supplementary Accessibility Requirements), G (Flood-Resistant
Construction), H (Signs), and J (Grading) is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the
building code of the city of Edmonds. The provisions of this code shall regulate the erection,
construction, enlargement, alteration, equipment, use, area and maintenance of buildings and
structures in the city; and provide for the issuance of permits and the collection of permit fees.
B. Referenced Codes. Where the following codes are referenced within any of the codes
adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19, they shall be substituted as follows:
1. “International Building Code” shall mean the building code as adopted and amended
in ECDC Title 19.
2. “International Residential Code” shall mean the residential building code as adopted
and amended in ECDC Title 19.
3. “International Mechanical Code” shall mean the mechanical code as adopted and
amended in ECDC Title 19.
4. “International Fuel Gas Code” shall mean the fuel gas code as adopted in
Chapter 19.27 RCW and in accordance with the mechanical code as adopted and amended in
ECDC Title 19.
5. “International Fire Code” shall mean the fire code as adopted and amended in
ECDC Title 19.
6. “Uniform Plumbing Code” shall mean the plumbing code as adopted and amended
in ECDC Title 19.
7. “Washington State Energy Code” shall mean the energy code as adopted and
amended in ECDC Title 19.
8. The “National Electrical Code” shall mean the electrical code as adopted and
amended in ECDC Title 19.
9. “Uniform Housing Code” shall mean the housing code as adopted and amended in
ECDC Title 19.
10. “Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings” shall mean the
dangerous buildings code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19.
11. “State Historic Building Code” shall mean the historic building code as adopted and
amended in ECDC Title 19.
Packet Page 186 of 302
19-3
12. “Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code” shall mean the
ventilation code as adopted and amended by ECDC Title 19.
13. International Existing Building Code: Not adopted. All references shall be
disregarded.
14 International Property Maintenance Code: Not adopted. All references shall be
disregarded.
15. International Electrical Code: Not adopted. All references shall be disregarded.
These codes shall be considered part of the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of
each such reference. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.00.005 Section amendments.
The following sections of the IBC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows:
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 104.3 Notices and orders. The building official shall issue all necessary
notices or orders to ensure compliance with this code. The building official is also authorized
to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code compliance in addition to the remedies provided for in
this code.
2. Section 105.1.1 Annual permit. Deleted.
3. Section 105.1.2 Annual permit records. Deleted.
4. Section 105.2 Work exempt from permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.010.
5. Section 105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application.
a. Applications, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the
date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review
may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
b. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for
a period not exceeding 180 days prior to such expiration date.
c. No application shall be extended more than once for a total application
life of 360 days. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a
new application, revised plans based on any applicable code or ordinance change, and pay new
plan review fees.
6. Section 105.5 Permit expiration and extension.
a. Every permit issued under ECDC Title 19 shall expire by limitation 360
days after issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)(b) and ECDC
19.10.010A4(a).
b. The following permits shall expire by limitation, 180 days after issuance
and may not be extended:
i. Demolition permits required by ECDC 19.00.030.
ii. Permits for Moving Buildings required by Chapter 19.60 ECDC.
iii. Mechanical permits.
Packet Page 187 of 302
19-4
iv. Tank removal, tank fill, or tank placement permits.
v. Grading, excavation and fill permits.
vi. Water service line permits.
vii. Plumbing permits.
viii. Gas piping permits.
ix. Deck and dock permits.
x. Fence permits.
xi. Re-roof permits.
xii. Rockery and retaining wall permits.
xiii. Swimming pool, hot tub and spa permits.
xiv. Sign permits.
xv. Shoring permits.
xvi. Foundation permits.
c. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in
writing an extension for an additional year. If the plans and specifications for the permit
extension application are the same as the plans and specifications submitted for the original
permit application and provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection
conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended.
Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one half the original building permit fee to extend the
permit.
d. If the applicant cannot complete work issued under an extended permit
within a total period of two (2) years, the applicant may request in writing, prior to the second
year expiration, an extension for a third and final year. Provided there has been at least one (1)
required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the
permit shall be extended for a third and final year. In lieu of permit fees for the third year
extension, inspection fees shall be charged for the remaining work based on the number of
required inspections remaining for the project for all city departments.
e. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended
shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the
original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building
permit shall be required, with full permit fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The
voiding of the prior permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or building codes.
Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with
ECDC 20.105.020(B), the time limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed
until final decision.
f. The building official may reject requests for permit extension where he
determines that modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and building codes have
occurred since the original issuance of the permit and/or modifications or amendments would
significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of a
new permit.
Packet Page 188 of 302
19-5
7. Section 105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit.
a. In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit
application with full permit fees shall be submitted to the building official.
b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and
building codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is sought
to recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under the codes in
effect when an application for a new permit is submitted which fully complies with ECDC
19.00.015. When additional plan review is required, plan review fees shall be charged.
8. Section 106.3.3 Phased approval for multi-family and commercial development.
a. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction as
part of a development before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or
structure have been approved provided architectural design board approval has been granted.
b. Phased approval means permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may
be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city
engineer and fire marshal, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless
approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements including, but not
limited to; curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage
have been signed as approved by the city engineer.
c. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the
city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city
standards for the improvements.
9. Section 107 Temporary structures and uses. Deleted.
10. Section 108 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC.
11. Section 112 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
B. Chapter 5 General Building Heights and Areas.
1. Section 501.2 Premises identification. Approved numbers or addresses shall be
installed by the property owner for new buildings in such a position as to be clearly visible and
legible from the street or roadway fronting the property. Letters or numbers shall be a
minimum six (6) inches in height and stroke a minimum of .75 inch of a contrasting color to the
building base color.
C. Chapter 31 Special Construction.
1. Section 3103 Temporary structures. Deleted.
2. Section 3108.1.1 Radio, television and cellular communication related
equipment and devices.
a. A permit is required for the installation or relocation of commercial
radio, television or cellular tower support structures including monopoles, guyed or lattice
towers, whip antennas, panel antennas, parabolic antennas and related accessory equipment,
and accessory equipment shelters (regardless of size) including roof mounted equipment
shelters.
Packet Page 189 of 302
19-6
3. Section 3109.1 Applicability and maintenance. Swimming pools, hot tubs and
spas of all occupancies shall comply with the requirements of this section and other applicable
sections of this code.
a. It is the responsibility of the owner to maintain the swimming pool, hot
tub or spa in a clean and sanitary condition and all equipment maintained in a satisfactory
operating condition when the swimming pool, hot tub or spa is in use. A swimming pool, hot
tub or spa that is neglected, not secured from public entry and/or not maintained shall be
determined to be a hazard to health and safety and shall be properly mitigated to the satisfaction
of the building official.
4. Section 3109.1.1 Permit required. It shall be unlawful for any person to install,
remove, alter, fill with material other than water, repair or replace any swimming pool, hot tub
or spa in a building or on premises without first obtaining a permit to do such work from the
building official. Reference ECDC 19.00.010(K) for permit exemptions.
5. Section 3109.3 Public swimming pools. Deleted.
6. Section 3109.4 Residential swimming pools. Deleted.
7. Section 3109.6 Fences and gates.
a. The swimming pool area shall be completely surrounded by a substantial
fence at least six (6) feet in height. No openings shall be greater than two (2) inches, and a self-
closing, self-latching gate shall be provided, with an inside lock inaccessible to children aged
five (5) years or younger.
b. The gate shall be securely locked when the swimming pool is unattended.
c. Any swimming pool not presently fenced as required by this section shall
be fenced within sixty (60) days of this code adoption.
8. Section 3109.7 Location and setbacks. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas shall
meet requirements of the zoning code of the city of Edmonds.
a. Minimum setbacks are measured from property lines to the inside face of
the pool, hot tub or spa as required by the zoning code for accessory structures.
b. All other accessory buildings and equipment shall meet the normally
required setbacks for accessory structures in the zone in which they are located.
9. Section 3109.8 Equipment foundations and enclosures.
a. All mechanical equipment supported from the ground shall rest on level
concrete or other approved base extending not less than three (3) inches above the adjoining
ground level.
b. All heating and electrical equipment, unless approved for outdoor
installation, shall be adequately protected against the weather or installed within a building.
10. Section 3109.9 Accessibility and clearances. Equipment shall be so installed as
to provide accessibility for cleaning, operating, maintenance, and servicing.
11. Section 3109.10 Tests and cross connection devices.
a. All swimming pool, hot tub and spa piping shall be inspected and
approved before being covered or concealed.
Packet Page 190 of 302
19-7
b. Washington State Department of Health approved cross connection
devices are required to be provided when used to fill any swimming pool, hot tub or spa.
12. Section 3109.11 Wastewater disposal. A means of disposal of the total contents
of the swimming pool, hot tub or spa (including partial or periodic emptying) shall be reviewed
and approved by the public works director.
a. No direct connection shall be made between any swimming pool, hot tub
or spa to any storm drain, city sewer main, drainage system, seepage pit, underground leaching
pit, or sub-soil drain.
b. A sanitary tee (outside cleanout installed on the main building side sewer
line) shall be provided for draining of treated water into the city sanitary sewer system.
13. Section 3109.12 Inspection requirements. The appropriate city inspector shall be
notified for the following applicable inspections:
a. Footing, wall, pre-form, pre-gunite, erosion control, underground
plumbing, sanitary extension and cleanout, mechanical pool equipment, gas piping, mechanical
enclosure location, cross connection and final inspection.
b. An initial cross connection control installation inspection is required by
the city cross connection control specialist prior to final installation approval.
c. All backflow assemblies shall be tested by state certified backflow
assembly testers upon initial installation and then annually thereafter. Copies of all test reports
shall be submitted to the city water division for review and approval.
D. Appendix E Accessibility Requirements.
1. Section E107 Signage. Deleted.
2. Section E108 Bus stops. Deleted.
3. Section E110 Airports. Deleted.
4. Section E111 Referenced Standards. Deleted.
E. Appendix H Signs.
1. Section H101.2 Signs exempt from permits. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.010(Q).
2. Section H101.2.1 Prohibited signs.
a. It is unlawful for any person to advertise or display any visually
communicated message, by letter or pictorially, of any kind on any seating bench, or in direct
connection with any bench.
b. All signs not expressly permitted by Chapter 20.60 ECDC.
c. Signs which the city engineer determines to be a hazard to vehicle or
pedestrian traffic because they resemble or obscure a traffic control device, or pose a hazard to
a pedestrian walkway or because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic passage. Such
signs shall be immediately removed at the request of the city engineer.
d. All signs which are located within a public right-of-way and that have
been improperly posted or displayed are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be
subject to immediate removal and confiscation per ECDC 20.60.090.
3. Section H104 Identification. Deleted.
4. Section H106.1.1 Internally illuminated signs. Deleted.
Packet Page 191 of 302
19-8
5. Section H107 Combustible materials. Deleted.
6. Section H108 Animated devices. Deleted.
7. Section H109.1 Height restrictions. Deleted.
8. Section H110 Roof signs. Deleted.
F. Appendix J Grading.
1. Section J103.2 Exemptions. Replaced by 19.00.010(M). [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.00.010 Work exempt from permit.
IBC Section 105.2 is replaced with the following:
Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization
for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other
laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with bulk
zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per Chapter
18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless subject to the provisions
of ECDC Title 23 or limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. or
Chapter 20.15B. ECDC:
A. One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses
and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured to the exterior wall or post) does not exceed
120 square feet, with a maximum eave of thirty (30) inches.
B. Fences not over six (6) feet high; provided a permit is not required by Chapter 17.30
ECDC.
C. Movable cases, counters and partitions not over five (5) feet nine (9) inches high.
D. Retaining walls four feet (4) in height or less measured vertically from the finished
grade at the exposed toe of the retaining wall to the highest point in the wall, unless:
1. Supporting a surcharge; or
2. Impounding Class I, II, III-A liquids; or
3. Located in a critical area, in which case a permit shall be required.
3. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
E. Rockeries. less than eight (8) feet in height measured vertically from the finished grade
at the toe of the rockery to the highest point of the uppermost rock, provided the rockery is
designed for erosion protection purposes only and is placed against an existing cut slope, unless
located in a critical area.
F. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 500 gallons
and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two (2) to one (1).
G. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not
over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a
permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC.
Packet Page 192 of 302
19-9
H. Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, walks, ramps not more than thirty (30) inches
above grade and not over any basement or story below, and which are not part of an
accessible route.
H. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish work.
I. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery.
J. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes, not including
service systems.
K. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to an occupancy in which the pool walls are
entirely above the adjacent grade and the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons. Hot tubs and
spas less than 5,000 gallons, completely supported by the ground.
L. Swings and other playground equipment accessory to an occupancy.
M. Grading in an isolated, self contained, non-critical area, provided; there is no
danger to the public, and such grading will not adversely affect adjoining properties, and
less than fifty (50) cubic yards are (placed, removed or moved within any 365 day period)
unless subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
N. Repair of appliances which do not alter original approval, certification, listing or code.
O. Replacement or adding new insulation with no drywall removal or placement.
P. Replacement or repair of existing gutters or downspouts.
Q. The following types of signs are exempt from permit requirements except that
dimensional size and placement standards shall comply with Chapter 20.60 ECDC:
1. Replacing the panel on a previously permitted existing wall cabinet or pole sign,
2. Repainting an existing previously permitted wood sign
3. Painted or vinyl lettering on storefront windows
4. Governmental signs, campaign signs, official public notices, and signs required
by provision of local, state, or federal law,
5. Temporary signs announcing the sale or rent of property and other temporary
signs as described in ECDC 20.60.080,
6. Signs erected by the transportation authorities, and temporary seasonal and
holiday displays.
R. Television antennas less than thirty-nine (39) inches in diameter.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 193 of 302
19-10
19.00.015 Fully complete application.
In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant’s rights shall vest
when a fully complete building permit application is filed. A fully complete building permit
application is an application executed by the owners of the property for which the application is
submitted or the duly authorized agent(s) for such owners, containing each and every document
required under the terms of these ordinances and the IBC and is substantially complete in all
respects. It is anticipated that minor changes or revisions may be required and are frequently made
in the course of any building application review process, and such minor revisions or changes shall
not keep an application from being deemed complete if a good faith attempt has been made to
submit a substantially complete application containing all required components. Where required,
the application and supporting documents shall be stamped and/or certified by the appropriate
engineering, surveying or other professional consultants. A fully complete building permit
application shall be accompanied by all fees, including but not limited to building permit fees and
plan review fees required under the provisions of this chapter and code. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.00.020 Concurrent review.
An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review
services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any
necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing; provided, that any
building permit application submitted concurrently with an application for discretionary permit or
approvals shall not be considered complete unless the applicant submits a signed statement, on a
form approved by the director, which acknowledges that the building permit application is subject
to any conditions or requirements imposed pursuant to the review and approval of any necessary or
required discretionary permit or approvals. The applicant shall solely bear the risk of building
permit submittal with discretionary permit approval. If after discretionary approval, the building
permit plans are modified or amended to comply with conditions or restrictions required by any
discretionary permit or approval, the applicant shall be solely responsible for any and all costs
which result therefrom, including but not limited to additional full plan review fees; provided
further, that any applicant-initiated changes made after the original plan review is complete shall
also require payment of full plan review fees. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.00.025 Architectural design review – Optional vesting.
In addition to the vesting rights created by RCW 19.27.095 and ECDC 19.00.015, an applicant for
development as defined in ECDC 20.10.010 and subject to architectural design board (ADB)
review may, at the applicant’s option, file a fully complete augmented architectural design review
application (hereinafter “augmented ADB application”) and vest rights including applicable permit,
development and impact fees under the provisions of the ECDC and the state building code as
adopted and amended by the city of Edmonds, ECDC Title 19 as then in effect, to, but only to, the
extent that the application provides full and detailed information necessary to confirm the particular
regulation to be vested. The burden is on the applicant to provide such detail.
A. A fully complete, augmented application for architectural design review shall consist of a
complete application for architectural design review, executed by each and every property owner of
record of the development site or their duly authorized agent(s), accompanied by the following:
1. All fees required by ordinance, including impact mitigation fees, to be deposited at
the time such State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements become final.
Packet Page 194 of 302
19-11
2. A site plan showing the current zoning of the development site, the footprint of all
proposed structures, the total square footage and use of each floor, all setbacks required by either
the zoning code or state building codes, proposed parking configurations, and exits.
3. Elevation drawings showing the original grade of the site, any proposed alterations
to grade, the proposed height of the structure and the number of stories.
4. A letter executed by all owners of record or their duly authorized agent(s) detailing
the proposed use in sufficient detail to determine whether the proposed use complies with the
zoning code then in effect and with the building code then in effect to determine type of
construction and occupancy classifications of the IBC and IFC as those codes then in effect.
5. A building permit application, as described in IBC Section 105.3 as the same exists
or is hereafter amended, and all building permit and plan review fees as established and set forth in
Chapter 19.70 ECDC; provided, that the plans required by IBC Section 106, as the same exists or is
hereafter amended, and other engineering documents, plans or drawings required by ECDC Title 18
may be submitted within 90 days of final ADB approval, or final approval on appeal.
B. Upon filing of the augmented ADB application, the applicant shall be deemed fully vested
as if a fully complete building permit application had been filed; provided:
1. The burden shall be upon the applicant to supply all material required by the
provisions of this section and as necessary to meet the requirements of Chapter 20.10 ECDC. The
applicant may supplement the original application in the event an application is deemed incomplete
by the development services director or designee. Vesting shall occur only when the application is
deemed complete by the development services director. Failure to supplement an incomplete
application within 90 days of final ADB approval shall result in forfeiture of all fees paid and no
vesting right shall attach.
2. The application shall expire along with all rights vested 180 days following the date
of application if final architectural design approval is not received.
a. The development services director or designee may issue an extension for an
additional period, not exceeding 180 days, upon written request by the applicant(s) or their
agent(s). Such request for extension shall be filed prior to the expiration of the original application
time period. An extension shall be granted if the architectural design board has not yet considered
the application or an appeal thereof is pending.
b. The time period shall run concurrently with the periods established by ECDC
19.00.005 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. No application shall be extended more than
once. In order to renew an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit all required
information and pay a new plan review fee.
3. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of state law and regulation and this
code regarding SEPA review. Review periods or delays occasioned by SEPA shall stay the time
periods set by this chapter.
4. Following final ADB approval, the applicant shall file the plans and information
required by IBC Section 106. It is anticipated that minor adjustments and changes may and are
usually required to the plans submitted as a result of the plan review and administrative process;
provided, that the following changes shall not be considered “minor” and shall forfeit vesting
rights, and shall require the filing of a new application:
a. Any substantial change not required by the terms of ADB approval.
Packet Page 195 of 302
19-12
b. Any increase in height or total square footage or any change which would
change the occupancy classification for the purposes of the state building code.
5. Any decision of the city staff regarding the application stated in this section and its
interpretation shall be appealable only to the superior court of Snohomish County by Land Use
Petition Act and is not subject to the provisions of Chapter 20.105 ECDC.
C. The rights vested by ECDC 19.00.015 and this section refer only to zoning and building
code rights protected by RCW 19.27.095.
D. These sections shall not be interpreted to create vesting rights not protected by RCW
19.27.095 and shall not be interpreted as a further limitation on the administrative obligations and
legislative powers of the city. By way of illustration and not limitation, this chapter does not limit:
1. The city council’s authority to create local improvement districts.
2. The city council’s authority to legislate life safety requirements that are not required
to recognize existing vested rights.
3. Environmental and shorelines review and mitigation procedures.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.00.030 Demolition permits.
Before the partial or complete demolition of any building or structure (interior or exterior), a
demolition permit shall be obtained from the building official. The permit fee is hereby established
as set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. The applicant shall also post with the city, prior to permit
issuance, a performance bond, or frozen fund, conforming to Chapter 17.10 ECDC herein, in an
amount to be determined by the building official to satisfy all city requirements no later than 180
days after the issuance of the permit. The demolition performance bond or frozen fund shall not be
released until the building official determines the following requirements have been completed:
A. Plug or Cap Abandoned Sanitary Sewers. Septic tanks are to be pumped, collapsed and
removed and/or filled with earth, sand, concrete, CDF or hard slurry.
B. Knock Down of Concrete Foundation Walls, Porches, Chimneys and Similar Structures.
Concrete, bricks, cobbles and boulders shall be broken to less than 12-inch diameter. Debris left on
site shall conform to IBC Section 1803.2 for clean fill.
C. Construction debris, vegetation, and garbage attributable to the demolition from adjacent
streets, alleys and on-site shall be removed from the site and from unopened street right of
way within 30 days of written notice. No debris of any kind may be placed on street right of
way (including alleys) without a right-of-way permit.
D. Repair of any damage to, and restoration of, any public property to substantially original
conditions, i.e., alley, street, sidewalk, landscaping, water meter, utilities, rockeries, retaining
walls, etc.
E. Grading of Site Back to Original Topography Grades. Basements shall be filled and
compacted to 90 percent to be verified by special inspector. Structural fill is defined as any fill
placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils need to support loads without
unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill should be clean and free draining and should
Packet Page 196 of 302
19-13
be placed above unyielding native site soils and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent modified
proctor, per ASTM D1557.
F. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control shall be is installed and maintained per
Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 197 of 302
19-14
Chapter 19.05
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE
Sections:
19.05.000 International Residential Code adopted.
19.05.005 Section amendments.
19.05.010 Work exempt from permit.
19.05.015 Fully complete application.
19.05.020 Concurrent review.
19.05.025 Manufactured home installation standards.
19.05.000 International Residential Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.020 and 19.27.074, the 2006 Edition of the
International Residential Code (IRC) as published by the International Code Council (ICC),
including the state amendments set forth in RCW 34.05 and Chapter 51-51 WAC, including the
following appendices: A (Sizing and Capacities of Gas Piping), B (Sizing of Venting Systems
Serving Appliances Equipped with Draft Hoods, Category 1 Appliances, and Appliances Listed For
Use and Type B Vents), C (Exit Terminals of Mechanical Draft and Direct-Vent Venting Systems),
and K (Sound Transmission Control) is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the
residential building code of the city of Edmonds. The provisions of this code shall regulate the
erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, equipment, use, area, and maintenance of residential
buildings and structures in the city, and provide for the issuance of permits and the collection of
permit fees. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.05.005 Section amendments.
The following sections of the IRC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows:
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section R104.3 Notices and orders. The building official shall issue all
necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with this code. The building official is also
authorized to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code compliance in addition to the remedies
provided for in this code.
2. Section R105.2 Work exempt from permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.05.010.
3. Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application. Replaced by ECDC
19.00.005(A)(5).
4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension. Every permit issued shall
expire by limitation 360 days after issuance except as provided in 19.00.005(A)(6)(b) and
19.10.010.A4(a).
5. Section R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit. Replaced by ECDC
19.00.005(A)(7).
6. R106.3.1 Approval of construction documents. When the building official
issues a permit, the construction documents shall be approved, in writing or by a stamp
which states “APPROVED PLANS’. One set of approved construction documents shall
be retained by the building official. One set of approved construction documents shall be
Packet Page 198 of 302
19-15
returned to the applicant and shall be made available on site to the building official or
duly authorized agent of the city.
7. Section R106.3.3 Phased approval. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.005(A)(8).
8. Section R107 Temporary structures and uses. Deleted.
9. Section R108 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC.
10. Section R109.1.5.1.2 Lath or gypsum board inspection. To be made after all
lathing and gypsum board, interior and exterior, is in place, but before any plastering is applied
or before gypsum board joints and fasteners are taped and finished.
11. Section R112 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
B. Chapter 2, Definitions.
1. Section R202 Accessory Structure. Deleted.
C. Chapter 3 Building Planning.
1. Table R301.2(1) Climatic and geographic design criteria.
a. Ground Snow load = 25PSF
b. Wind Speed(e)(mph) = 85
c. Seismic Design Category(g) = D2
d. Weathering(a) = moderate
e. Frost Line Depth(b) = 18”
f. Termite(c) = Yes
g. Decay(d) = slight to moderate
h. Winter Design Temp(f) = 27 degrees
i. Flood Hazards(h) NFIP date of adoption 3-26-74 Effective FIRM Maps
11-8-99
j. Ice Shield Underlayment required(i) = No
k. Air Freezing Index(j) = 0-1000
l. Mean Annual Temp(k) = 50 degrees
Refer to Table R301.2(1) for applicable footnotes.
2. Section R324 Automatic fire sprinkler system. An automatic fire sprinkler
system is required for buildings containing five (5) or more attached dwelling units. Refer to
ECDC 19.25.040.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.05.010 Work exempt from permit.
IRC Section R105.2 is replaced with the following:
Packet Page 199 of 302
19-16
Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization
for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other
laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with bulk
zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per Chapter
18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless limited or prohibited by the
provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC or Chapter 20.15B ECDC Title 23. In addition to the
permit exemptions of ECDC 19.00.010, the following single family dwelling exemptions shall
apply:
A. One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses
and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured to the exterior wall or post) does not exceed
120 square feet, with a maximum eave of thirty (30) inches and maximum height of fifteen (15)
feet.
B. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not project more than fifty-four
(54) inches from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. ECDC Title 23
provisions do not apply.
C. Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet.
D. Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply.
E. Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not
apply.
F. Replacement or repair of existing window or doors with no change in size or framing.
ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply.
G. Replacement or repair of individual decking, joists, stair treads, or intermediate rails.
ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply.
H. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not
over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a
permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC.
I. Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, not more than thirty (30) inches above grade
and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.05.015 Fully complete application.
In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant’s rights shall vest
when a fully complete building permit application is filed pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015. [Ord. 3502
§ 2, 2004].
Packet Page 200 of 302
19-17
19.05.020 Concurrent review.
An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review
services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any
necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing pursuant to ECDC
19.00.020. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.05.025 Manufactured home installation standards.
A. Existing Permit Regulations.
1. Except as hereafter amended, Chapter 296-150M WAC, as currently promulgated
together with any future amendments thereof, or future additions thereto, is hereby adopted by
reference and incorporated into the ECDC as if set forth herein in full. The building official is
authorized to issue building permits and collect permit fees for the installation of all manufactured
homes that meet the requirements of this chapter, to inspect the installation of manufactured homes,
and enforce all violations of this chapter.
2. All references to “installation permits” in Chapter 296-150M WAC, as herein
adopted by reference, shall refer to building permits issued for the installation of manufactured
homes.
3. Fees for the installation of a manufactured home shall be set forth in Chapter 19.70
ECDC. All other applicable development fees shall also be imposed as with any other single-
family residence.
4. Manufactured Mobile homes are permitted only within designated mobile home
parks.
B. Effective July 1, 2005, the following provisions shall apply:
5. Pursuant to added RCW 35.21.2, 35A.21.3, 36.01.4, and amended RCW 35.63.160
and 1998 c 239 s 1., homes built to 42 USC Section 5401 through 5403 standards (as amended in
2000) shall be regulated for the purposes of siting, in the same manner as site built homes, factory
built homes, or homes built to any other approved state construction.
2. The building official is authorized to issue building permits and collect permit fees
for the installation of all manufactured homes that meet the requirements of this chapter, inspect the
installation of manufactured homes, and enforce all violations of this chapter.
3. All references to “installation permits” in Chapter 296-150M WAC, as herein
adopted by reference, shall refer to building permits issued for the installation of manufactured
homes.
4. Fees for the installation of a manufactured home are set forth in Chapter 19.70
ECDC. All other applicable development fees shall also be imposed as with any other single-
family residence.
6. Manufactured homes to be placed within the city shall not be older than three
calendar years from the date of complete permit application submittal. The applicant is required to
provide the vehicle identification number (VIN) information.
6. Manufactured homes are required to be placed upon a permanent building code
compliant foundation pursuant to IRC Chapter 4 and/or IBC Chapter 18. The building official shall
determine all required inspections for a manufactured home.
Packet Page 201 of 302
19-18
7. All spaces measured from the underside of the home to finished grade shall be
enclosed with a decorative skirting.
8. Manufactured homes shall be thermally equivalent to the current state energy code.
9. The minimum manufactured home size shall be at least two fully enclosed parallel
sections each not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long.
10. Coated metal, tin, or vinyl roofing material is not permitted.
11. Manufactured homes shall comply with all other development standards of this
code. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 202 of 302
19-19
Chapter 19.10
BUILDING PERMITS - EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND
LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS
Sections:
19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application.
19.10.010 Section amendments.
19.10.020 Definitions.
19.10.030 Minimum required application submissions.
19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers.
19.10.050 Site bonds, contractor general public liability insurance.
19.10.060 Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available
science.
19.10.070 Issuance and denial of permits.
19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and
final geotechnical report.
19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application.
A. This chapter has been enacted in order to provide both substantive and procedural
provisions relating to the issuance of permits within designated earth subsidence and landslide
hazard areas of the city. It shall be the policy of the city that no permit shall be issued for any site
which is found to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory
foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography for the particular permit requested for
issuance. When development occurs on an unstable site, an unreasonable risk of danger may exist
to the public, to public improvements or to adjacent property owners. If such a site can be
stabilized through the construction of on-site improvements, that risk may be reduced.
B. The construction of professionally designed structures addressing the risks of earth
movement, and employing feasible attendant measures (including but not limited to: drainage
improvements, specially designed foundations, retaining walls, removal of overburden and other
improvements designed to minimize the risk of earth movement, prevent avoidable damage to
structures, safeguard adjacent properties, limit risk to inhabitants, and to stabilize the structure in
the event of movement) may mitigate and reduce the risk of earth movement on individual
properties. Nothing herein shall relieve an owner of any obligation imposed by the State Building
Code or City ordinance to take all reasonable and practical measures available to reduce or
eliminate the risk or hazard.
C. The IRC/IBC, as promulgated by the state of Washington and required to be adopted by the
city, does not specify a standard regarding lot stability. Since the city’s request for an interpretation
of the uniform building code by the state building code council to designate an acceptable level of
lot stability was denied, and because the city wishes to comply with state law requiring that the
issuance of building permits be a ministerial and not a discretionary act, the provisions of this
chapter have been adopted in order to provide reasonable certainty in the permit issuance process.
The purpose of these provisions is not to lessen the minimum requirements of the current adopted
building code, but rather to define its requirements for city implementation.
Packet Page 203 of 302
19-20
D. These provisions have been adopted in order to establish a policy that permits shall not be
issued for any site where a substantial risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard exist unless:
1. The risks can be defined with reasonable scientific certainty and found to be within
acceptable limits as determined in accordance with this chapter.
2. Any hazard associated with the site is scientifically ascertained and fully disclosed
through the permit process.
3. Notice of any risk is given to future purchasers through the land records of
Snohomish County.
4. Any risks associated with construction and habitation are assumed by the builder
and future owners of the site.
5. Adequate indemnification is provided by the builder, and the owner of, the site in
order that the general public not assume or bear any portion of the costs or liability associated with
the builder’s investigation, design and construction as well as the continuing maintenance of the
site by the property owner.
E. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this ordinance or the IRC/IBC, all applications
for permits received for any site, any portion of which lies within an earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area, shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter. In addition to all other
requirements of these sections, the restrictions and provisions of this chapter shall apply to all
building, grading, fill and excavation permits (herein “permits”). Minor permits such as plumbing,
mechanical, re-roof and interior alterations are exempt from the requirements of this chapter.
F. All applications for 19.10 ECDC permits shall disclose within the geotechnical report
whether or not any part of the site lies within, or adjacent to an earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area or within a critical area as defined by the city’s environmentally critical areas title. The
building official may require preliminary investigation by a geotechnical engineer for any applicant
whose property lies within or lies adjacent to a known earth subsidence landslide hazard area, or
within a known hazard area, or areas with steep slopes or unusual topography or which has a
history of earth movement in order to assist the building official in determining whether these
provisions should be applied.
G. Nothing in this chapter should or shall be interpreted to guarantee issuance of a permit with
respect to any property unless the requirements of the IRC/IBC as amended and interpreted by this
chapter have been met.
19.10.010 Section amendments.
The provisions of this section amend the 2003 edition of the IRC/IBC and all subsequent revisions
adopted by RCW 19.27.031 as the state building code as previously amended by Chapter 19.05
ECDC. All prior substantive amendments have received the approval of the state building code
council. All provisions of the IRC/IBC which conflict with this chapter shall be deemed amended
hereby, and any ambiguity created, shall be resolved in favor of the specific provision or general
intent of said chapter. In addition to the amendments of the IRC/IBC by its alteration,
improvement and correction to incorporate the chapter, the following specific code provisions are
Packet Page 204 of 302
19-21
amended and the substantive and procedural requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC are amended by
the correction and alteration of the following sections of the IRC/IBC:
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section R105.1.1 Permit Review Applicability. Any permit requested for a site
lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC
19.10.020(F) shall be processed and acted upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10
ECDC.
2. Section R105.2 Work exempt from a permit. ECDC 19.00.010 exemptions A, B, D,
E, F, G, J, K, M, and P and ECDC 19.05.010 exemptions, A, C, and D shall not apply in any area
designated as an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(F).
3. Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application.
a. Applications, for which no permit is issued within two (2) year following the
date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may
thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
b. The building official may not extend the time for action by the applicant on
an expired application. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall
submit a new application, revised plans based on current adopted codes and pay new plan review
fees as well as any outstanding peer review fees incurred to date.
4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension.
a. Every permit issued under the provisions and development standards of
Chapter 19.10 ECDC shall expire by limitation two (2) years after issuance, except as provided in
ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)(b).
b. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an
extension for a third and final year. If the plans and specifications for the permit extension
application are the same as the plans and specifications submitted for the original permit
application and provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by
the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be
charged at a rate of one half the original building permit fee to extend the permit.
c. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be
a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the original date of
permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit shall be required,
with full fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The issuance of a new permit shall
negate all previous vesting of zoning or building codes. Whenever an appeal is filed and a
necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, the time
limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision.
d. The building official shall reject requests for permit extensions if
modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and building codes have occurred since the
original issuance of the permit, and modifications or amendments would significantly promote
public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of a new permit.
5. Section R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit.
a. In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit application
with full fees shall be submitted to the building official.
Packet Page 205 of 302
19-22
b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and building
codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is sought to
recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under the codes in effect at
the time of complete application for the new permit, not the expired permit. When additional plan
review is required, plan review fees shall be charged. When applicable peer review and peer
review fees shall be assessed.
6. Section R106.3.3.1 Phased approval.
a. The building official may require sequencing of construction phases or
activities such as the installation of shoring or temporary erosion control remedies and/or drainage
systems, well in advance of grading or foundation construction on a time frame consistent with
geotechnical recommendations and peer review. As part of the sequencing process, the building
official may impose permit conditions that address site work sequencing to include but not limited
to: limiting all excavation, drainage systems and foundation installation to the dryer season
between May 1st and September 30th.
b. When permit conditions such as groundwork are limited by the building
official on a particular project, the applicants’ geotechnical engineer may submit a letter detailing
geotechnical recommendations that portions of work may progress. The letter shall include a
detailed work schedule submitted by the general contractor specifying work to be done, timeline,
provisions for monitoring and equipment to be used. Any such recommendation shall be based
upon best available science and be consistent with standard geotechnical engineering practice. The
building official may require a peer review prior to a decision which provides concurrence
regarding at least the following issues:
i. duration of work,
ii. type of equipment to use,
iii. additional temporary erosion and sediment control provisions required, and
iv. applicability of special inspections, and similar issues.
c. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction before
the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure have been approved provided
peer review approval has been granted. Phased approval means separate permits for grading,
shoring, and foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the
planning manager, city engineer, and city public works director, when applicable. No phased
approval permit shall be issued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site
improvements (including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines,
sewer lines, and storm drainage) have been signed as approved by the city engineer. With such
phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10
ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the improvements.
B. Chapter 2 Definitions.
1. Section R 202 and IBC 202, are hereby amended to include the definitions set forth
in ECDC 19.10.020, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
C. Chapter 4 Foundations.
1. Section R 401.1 General Exception 3. Any permit requested for a site lying in
whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be processed and acted
upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC.
Packet Page 206 of 302
19-23
D. IBC Chapter 16 Structural design.
1. Section IBC 1601.1.1 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter 19.10
ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
E. IBC Appendix J Grading.
1. Section IBC Appendix J 101.1.2 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter
19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
19.10.020 Definitions.
The following terms, when used within this chapter, shall have the following definitions:
A. “Architect” shall mean a person licensed to practice architecture by the state of Washington.
B. “Best available science” shall be determined in accordance with the criteria established in
WAC 365-195-900, et seq.
C. “Bluff” shall mean any slope ten (10) feet in height or greater
inclined at greater than 1 unit vertical in 1 unit horizontal or 100%
slope.
D. “Building Official” shall mean the building official of the city of Edmonds.
E. “Director” shall mean the director of development services as well as any authorized
representative of the director.
F. “Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area” shall mean any area of the city which, by
reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topography has a
risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances. The earth subsidence
and landslide hazard area is a subcategory of landslide hazard area (a geologically hazardous area)
as defined in city of Edmonds environmentally critical areas title. The hazard area designated as
the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area in the 2007 report of Landau
Associates and as may be amended in future adopted earth subsidence and landslide hazard maps
are hereby incorporated by this reference and made a part of this chapter as fully as if herein set
forth and may be provided in a summary text form. Future adopted landslide hazard maps shall be
incorporated by reference upon adoption by ordinance.
Areas designated on the adopted North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas
Map, or any future adopted landslide hazard map as having a risk of earth subsidence or landslide
hazard, areas with slopes as designated in ECDC 23.80.020, areas which exhibit geologic
characteristics of earth movement, or any other area identified as having a history of earth
movement shall be presumed to have such risk and shall be considered to be an earth subsidence
and landslide hazard area. Applicants for permits in such areas shall submit a geotechnical report
and complete plan set submittal as required by this chapter to the building official for review.
Packet Page 207 of 302
19-24
The presumption of risk shall be rebuttable and the decision of the director or building official that
any area lies within, or adjacent to, such earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be
appealable as a staff decision to superior court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act.
Copies of the reports and maps shall be maintained in the offices of the building official and shall
be available for inspection during all normal working hours. Individual copies of the reports and
map may be obtained by the public upon the payment of the cost of reproduction.
G. “General Contractor” shall mean a bonded, insured and registered contractor in the state of
Washington. A general contractor shall maintain state required bonding and shall carry general
public liability insurance in the minimum amount of one million dollars. The general contractor
shall have a current valid state contractor’s license with the state of Washington and a city of
Edmonds resident or non-resident business license, whichever is applicable.
H. “Geologist” means a practicing geologist licensed in the state of Washington with at least
four (4) years experience as a licensed geologist in responsible charge, including experience with
landslide evaluation.
I. “Geotechnical Engineer” means a practicing, geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a
professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least four (4) years of professional
employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge, including experience with landslide
evaluation.
J. “Landslide Hazard Area” means areas mapped or otherwise defined by the city of Edmonds
as environmental critical areas or geologically hazardous areas.
K. “Land Surveyor” means a person who holds a Washington State land surveyor’s license.
L. “Lead Design Professional” means the person designated by the applicant to oversee and
coordinate the permit review process on behalf of the applicant.
M. “Plan Set Submittal” means a complete application pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015 including:
1. Vicinity Map.
2. Topography map and survey.
3. Civil plans including; grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm
drainage, utilities and site improvements.
4. Tree cutting/land clearing plans.
5. Geotechnical report.
6. Architectural and structural plans with design calculations, stamped and signed by
licensed design professionals of the state of Washington.
N. “Site” means the entire area within the boundaries, as described in a legal description, of the
property that is to be developed under the permit for which the applicant has applied.
Packet Page 208 of 302
19-25
O. “Stable” shall mean that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent
properties, from soil instability is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the reports
developed under the requirements of ECDC 19.10.030 and the proposed development will not
increase the potential for soil movement.
In the event that any site has an underlying risk of movement based upon deep-seated earth
movement or large-scale earth failure which is not susceptible of correction by on-site
improvements, such hazard shall not render a site proposed for single-family residences to be
presumed unstable for the purpose of this provision if the geotechnical engineer of record and
recommendation of any peer reviewer confirm the risk of probability of earth movement is thirty
(30) percent or less within a twenty-five (25) year period.
In order to meet the definition of stable the geotechnical report shall include identified hazards for
the property and the mitigation measures proposed to reduce or correct the hazards along with
measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards, including, all on and off
site measures taken to correct or reduce the risk. These shall be fully disclosed to the applicant and
future owners, heirs and assigns in the covenant required to be executed in accordance with
provisions of this chapter, in which case the defined risk may be approved as an acceptable
condition.
P. “Steep Slope” shall be defined and calculated pursuant to Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
Q. “Storm Event” means one (1) inch or greater precipitation in a twenty-four (24) hour period
as reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
R. “Structural Engineer” means a person licensed to practice structural engineering by the state
of Washington.
S. “Structural Fill” shall mean any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill
soils are intended to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill
should be clean and free draining and should be placed above unyielding native site soils
compacted in accordance with an approved geotechnical report prepared utilizing best engineering
science.
19.10.030 Minimum required application submittals.
A. The applicant shall submit a complete plan set submittal and permit application and
specifications for the proposed development as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(M) and this chapter.
B. An Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard area permit submittal checklist shall be adopted
at the direction of the director and shall be provided to all persons inquiring regarding building
permit applications or development permits in the designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard
area of North Edmonds. The submittal checklist shall include but not be limited to the
requirements contained in city public handouts, written policies, adopted maps, reference maps,
summary reports, minimum geotechnical report guidelines, and the following:
1. North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map.
2. Vicinity map.
Packet Page 209 of 302
19-26
3. Topographic map and survey.
4. Civil plans (i.e., grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drainage,
utilities and site improvements).
5. Tree cutting/land clearing plan.
6. Geotechnical report.
7. Owner and professional declarations.
8. Detailed architectural and structural plans with structural calculations and
specifications.
9. Bonds, covenants and contractor public liability insurance in accordance with the
detailed requirements stated below.
If any item in the checklist is inapplicable to a particular project, a letter or a report shall be
provided to the director stamped by the appropriate licensed design professional, with sufficient
information or data to demonstrate why the item is inapplicable. The director may utilize
appropriate licensed consultants to determine if generally accepted engineering practice requires
submission of an application requirement. When consultants are used to determine if generally
accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application requirement the cost of review
shall be paid by the applicant.
C. A copy of the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map shall be
included in the submittal checklist materials.
D. The vicinity map shall be suitable for locating the site and include information related to
existing conditions on or near the site, based on the topographic map and survey and shall designate
all known landslide masses, or debris flows or mud flows on or near the site which could threaten
proposed structures within 100 feet, as referenced, noted, described or discussed in the geotechnical
report.
E. The applicant shall submit a topographic map and survey prepared and stamped by a
licensed land surveyor, prior to studies and evaluations by the geotechnical engineer, and shall
show:
1. Map scale, north arrow, legal description, tax account parcel numbers, easements,
lot property lines.
2. Existing grade contour lines, at two (2) foot intervals.
3. All distances between existing structures on the site and approximate distances of
existing habitable structures on adjacent sites within 50 feet of property lines (all adjacent sites
which could affect or be affected by the proposed development shall be shown).
4. Lowest footing or basement slab elevation of existing and proposed structures on the
property and on adjacent properties to the extent that such information is reasonably available and,
proposed finish floor elevations.
5. The location of existing sanitary sewers, storm water drainage facilities, septic tanks,
drain fields, wells, piezometers, private drainage systems, underground storage tanks, subsurface
Packet Page 210 of 302
19-27
drains, and other sewer/drainage facility components on, and adjacent to, the site to the extent such
information is reasonably available.
6. The location of all existing underground utilities on, and adjacent to, the site
including, but not limited to; telephone, cable television, gas, electric and water utilities, vaults, fire
hydrants and other cables, wires, meters and drainage pipes to the extent that such information is
available.
7. A separate topographical drawing shall be submitted showing proposed grade
contours at two (2) foot intervals. This drawing shall include bottom of proposed footing
elevations including all stepped footing elevations.
F. Civil engineered plans shall be prepared and stamped by a state of Washington licensed
civil engineer pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 ECDC and current adopted City
Stormwater Manual. Geotechnical report recommendations affecting civil plans shall be
incorporated into the design and detailed on the plans and shall include:
1. Storm drainage plan with storm drainage calculations.
2. Provisions for building pad and foundation drainage.
3. Temporary erosion and sediment control with drainage and maintenance provisions,
and/or other sediment control assemblies.
4. Permanent erosion control with drainage and maintenance provisions.
5. Fill/soil stockpile limitation provisions, specific location, height, protection and
maintenance.
6. Slope protection plans, rockeries, retaining walls, ecology blocks, keystone block
walls, soldier pile walls, and soil nail walls.
7. Utilities and site improvements.
8. Grading plans, temporary and permanent shoring plans, top and toe of slope
setbacks, driveway slope.
G. In lieu of the procedural requirements of Chapter 18.45 ECDC a tree cutting/land clearing
plan shall be submitted when significant trees are proposed to be removed. A significant tree is a
tree with a trunk diameter of six inches or greater measured 4 feet from the ground. No significant
tree shall be removed until the permit is approved.
A detailed landscape plan may also be required in order for the city to evaluate long-term erosion
control measures. The plan shall comply with all requirements of the ECDC relating to tree
clearing and critical areas review, if applicable. The director may require the project geotechnical
engineer’s concurrence regarding an approval of a tree cutting/land clearing plan when slope
stability is at issue.
H. Included in the permit submittal checklist shall be general and specific soils and
geotechnical information, details or analysis required pursuant to IBC 1802. The applicant shall
retain a geotechnical engineer to prepare a report and evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions
on the site to include:
Packet Page 211 of 302
19-28
1. The geotechnical report shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices, under the supervision of, and signed and stamped by, the
geotechnical engineer. A geologist may be required to be part of the geotechnical consulting staff.
The report shall reference the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007) as a technical document
reviewed as part of the geologic analysis for the project and discuss all items listed in the permit
submittal checklist and shall make specific recommendations concerning development of the site.
2. The opinions and recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be
supported by field observations and, where appropriate or applicable, by literature review,
conducted by the geotechnical engineer. The report shall be based on best available science.
3. The report shall include an analysis of material gathered through appropriate
explorations, such as borings or test pits to a minimum depth of 6 feet below the proposed lowest
footing or pile, an analysis of soil characteristics conducted by or under the supervision of, the
engineer in accordance with the standards adopted by the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or other applicable standards. The report must provide subsurface data to
support the engineer’s conclusions regarding slope stability.
4. If the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be
reviewed and approved by a geologist. It shall be the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer to
assure that the geologist meets the qualifications listed in the definition section. A letter of
concurrence from the geologist shall be included in the report.
5. Based upon the North Edmonds Landslide Area Geology and Slide Mechanisms
map and table found in the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007), any lot which contains any
portion of any hazard zone or is adjacent thereto, (regardless of whether the proposed building pad
is located within any hazard area) shall specifically consider within the geotechnical report, the
following types of typical hazard zones and shall specifically note if the hazard is, or is not, present
on the site. The report shall address hazards from encroaching landslide materials, hazards from
ground failure in material that has not previously failed, and hazards from ground failure in
previously failed material. For each landslide hazard identified on a property, the geotechnical
engineer shall identify the types of specific processes associated with the hazard and include design
features to reduce such hazards and mitigate impacts.
6. For properties containing or adjacent to bluffs, the geotechnical engineer shall, as a
part of the building permit process provide analysis of the rate of retreat of the bluff prepared by a
geologist and estimate the bluff retreat amount and regression rate for periods of twenty-five (25)
and 125 years. The geotechnical engineer shall address the effects of bluff retreat on the stability of
structures and/or improvements. A structure is defined as:
a. A building intended for human habitation,
b. A building, structure or other improvement, whose stress or weight, collapse
or movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure and,
c. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public
safety or provide stability.
If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate of retreat of the bluff is such that any structure or
improvement constructed pursuant to the building permit would be unreasonably endangered or
Packet Page 212 of 302
19-29
reasonably could be anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal
useful life, the application shall be denied.
7. Geotechnical letter addressing the provisions of Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
I. The applicant shall submit, consistent with the findings of the geotechnical report, detailed
structural plans with corresponding calculations prepared and stamped by the structural engineer of
record. When architectural plans incorporate such structural details said plans shall be stamped and
signed by the structural engineer of record. All other architectural plans may be prepared by an
architect, designer, builder or lay person.
J. The applicant shall submit documentation of required bonds, frozen funds or adequate
instrument of credit. The applicants shall submit a copy of the contractor’s general public liability
insurance pursuant to ECDC 19.10.050.
K. The applicant shall submit declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers as required by
ECDC 19.10.040.
19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers.
A. Notices of permit submittal application with the city shall be posted pursuant to ECDC
20.91.010B(b). Such notices shall be conspicuously posted and maintained at each street frontage
at the applicant’s expense and direction. Notice of permit issuance or denial shall be conspicuously
posted as required above. Upon each posting a ten (10) day appeal period shall commence.
Appeals shall be heard at Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use
Petition Act, and no other appeal shall be permitted.
B. At permit application submittal, the applicant shall submit a written declaration with the
permit application that includes the statement that the accuracy of all information is warranted by
the owner/applicant in a form which relieves the city and its staff from any liability associated with
reliance on such submittals.
The declaration shall also state that the owner/applicant understands and accepts the risk of
developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that the owner/applicant will advise in
writing any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective purchasers or residential lessees
of structures or portions of a structure on the site of the slide potential of the area.
The owner applicant shall also acknowledge that he, she or they understand and accept the need for
future monitoring and maintenance of the property as described in the final geotechnical report
when future monitoring and maintenance may affect slope stability over time. While an application
may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the city, all conclusions shall be those of the
owner/applicant and his or her professionals.
C. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter from the geotechnical engineer and
civil engineer who prepared the geotechnical report and civil plans, stating that in his or her
judgment the plans and specifications submitted for the project conform to the recommendations in
the geotechnical report, and that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent
Packet Page 213 of 302
19-30
properties, from soil instability will be minimized subject to the conditions set forth in the report;
and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement.
Minimized shall mean that the applicant has utilized best available science and commonly accepted
engineering and architectural practice to minimize, to the extent possible, the risks associated with
development of the property.
The geotechnical engineer shall review the erosion and sediment control plan and provide a
statement about the adequacy of the plan with respect to site conditions and report findings. The
geotechnical engineer’s statement shall also include an identification of landslide hazards
applicable to the site, the on-site measures taken to correct or reduce the hazards, as applicable, and
measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards.
For sites where the hazards are not mitigated or where the risks from deep-seated or large-scale
earth movement cannot be practically reduced by individual lot owners, the geotechnical engineer
shall prepare a statement identifying what design measures will be taken to mitigate the risk to
structures, adjacent properties, and inhabitants in the event of deep-seated or large-scale movement.
The statement shall specify any risks from earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design
measures and render an opinion as to whether the site will be stable within the meaning of the
ordinance following installation of all proposed improvements. The statement will clarify to
current and future owners what measures were installed to reduce risks and what hazards could not
be addressed by individual lot development.
D. Further recommendations signed and sealed by the geotechnical engineer shall be provided
should there be additions or exceptions to the original recommendations based on the plans, site
conditions or other supporting data. If the geotechnical engineer who reviews the plans and
specifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report, the new engineer
shall, in a letter to the director accompanying the plans and specifications, express agreement or
disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and state that the revised plans
and specifications conform to the new recommendations.
E. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter or notation on the design drawings by
the structural engineer of record stating that; he has reviewed the geotechnical report(s), that he
understands its recommendations, has explained or has had explained to the owner/applicant, the
risk of loss due to slides on the site, and that he has incorporated into the design the
recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or
damage that might be caused by any risk of earth movement referenced in the report. The
statement shall note any risks, hazards, potential problems from earth movement that are not fully
mitigated by design measures.
F. The owner shall execute a covenant, (in a form provided by the city) to be submitted with
the application (with necessary fee) to be filed with the Snohomish County Auditor. The director
shall cause such completed covenant to be so filed. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be
forwarded to the owner. This covenant shall be a covenant running with the land, which shall at a
minimum include:
1. A legal description of the property.
2. A statement explaining that the site is in a potential earth subsidence and landslide
hazard area, that the risk associated with the development of the site is set forth in permit file No.
_______ with the city of Edmonds building department, that conditions or prohibitions on
Packet Page 214 of 302
19-31
development may have been imposed by the city in the course of permit issuance, and referencing
any features in the design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated
soil changes. The covenant may incorporate by reference the statements and conditions to be
observed in the form proposed by the owner/applicant’s geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect
and/or structural engineer as approved after the review set forth in ECDC 19.10.060.
3 A statement waiving and promising to indemnify and hold harmless the city of
Edmonds, its officers and employees from any claims the owner/applicant and his/her successors or
assigns may have for any loss or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting
from soil movement and arising from or out of the issuances of any permit(s) authorizing
development on the site, as well as due to any act or failure to act by the indemnitor , its agents or
successors, in interest under or following issuance of the permit.
4. The date of permit issuance and permit number authorizing the development.
19.10.050 Site bonds and contractor general public liability insurance.
A. Site bonding requirements.
1. A surety bond, in an amount to be determined by the director, executed by a surety
company authorized to do business in the state of Washington shall be posted by the
owner/applicant or general contractor to assure the restoration of any areas on the site, or in the
surrounding area, disturbed or damaged by slides during construction, and to ensure completion of
the work authorized by the permit, or, if the work is not completed, to assure that the site will be
restored to a safe and stable condition at least equal to the safety and stability of the site prior to
commencement of work under the permit. The bond will be exonerated upon occupancy approval
of the building permit by the building official.
2. In lieu of the surety bond, the owner/applicant or general contractor may propose to
file a cash deposit or an instrument of credit with the director in an amount equal to that which
would be required in the surety bond, and similarly conditioned.
B. Public liability insurance. The general contractor of record shall carry general public
liability insurance effective through final occupancy in the minimum amount of one million dollars,
and which shall name the city as an additional named insured, against the injury, death, property
damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city’s involvement in the permitting process for the
project.
C. Homeowner insurance. The city strongly recommends that each property owner maintain
policies of liability insurance, adequate to provide sufficient funds, to indemnify and hold harmless
third parties in the event of earth subsidence or landslides emanating from or across the owner’s
property.
19.10.060 Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available
science.
A. The city shall require professional peer review of the plan set submittals accompanying the
permit application by a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, geologist, and/or structural engineer
as may be necessary and determined by the building official or director, in order to determine
whether the plan set submittals were prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering
practice or the practice of the particular engineering or design specialty and are based upon best
Packet Page 215 of 302
19-32
available science. The full cost of such peer review shall be paid in full by the owner/applicant
within thirty (30) days of billing by the city. Failure to make timely payments shall result in a stay
of city plan review services on the application.
B. This requirement may be selectively waived at the discretion of the director provided the
applicable project geotechnical engineer, civil engineer or structural engineer provides written
concurrence, determination, details, facts and/or data that individual site conditions warrant an
exemption from outside peer review. Once waived, the building official shall not be required to
inquire further into the adequacy of any report, plans, or data, but rather may rely upon the
submittals as warranted by the owner/applicant as reviewed by the city’s consultant. Nothing
herein shall relieve the owner/applicant of the obligation to submit a complete application fulfilling
all the requirements of this chapter and the IRC/IBC.
C. The final recommendation of the peer review regarding whether a submittal complies with
generally accepted practice and/or is based on best available science shall be binding upon the
building official. Such recommendation may be appealed to Superior Court under the Land Use
Petition Act.
19.10.070 Issuance and denial of permits.
A. Permit Issuance. The following requirements must be satisfied before a permit will be
issued:
1. An approved geotechnical report has been submitted and approved.
2. Plans and specifications have been submitted incorporating the recommendations of
the geotechnical report and said plans have been approved.
3. The required declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers have been submitted
and approved.
4. Required bonds, cash deposits and public liability insurance have been posted with
the city.
5. When peer review has been required, all submittals have been determined to have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice.
6. Peer review concurrence for permit issuance has been received by the building
official.
7. All other provisions of ECDC Titles 16, 18 & 20 have been reviewed and approved
by the appropriate city official.
B. Permit denial. The following criteria shall result in the denial of issuance of permit:
1. Building, grading and excavation permits for construction on land which the director
finds to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation
support, instability or unsuitable topography, or
2. The resulting development would increase the potential of soil movement resulting
in an unacceptable risk of damage to adjacent properties or an unreasonable risk of damage to the
proposed development, or
3. Excessive flooding, seepage, high water table, or inadequate drainage, or
Packet Page 216 of 302
19-33
4. If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate retreat of the bluff is such that
any structure or improvement would be unreasonably endangered or reasonably could be
anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal useful life, the
application shall be denied. A structure is defined as:
a. A building intended for human habitation,
b. A building, structure or other improvement, whose stress or weight, collapse
or movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure and,
c. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public
safety or provide stability, or
5. Other hazardous conditions posing an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or
welfare, or
6. Where the noted site dangers or geologic hazards are not minimized to the extent
possible by the use of best available science and generally accepted engineering and architectural
practice, or
7. If the applicant’s geotechnical engineer determines that there is a greater chance
than thirty (30) percent in a 25 year period that landslide damage on site will occur.
C. In making a determination of permit denial, the director shall consider not only the land
which is the subject of the application, but in addition, the surrounding area which would be
adversely affected if the permit were granted. Permit denial shall be made in writing to the
owner/applicant when the site cannot be rendered stable as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(O). This
decision and other preliminary determinations as referenced herein shall be appealable to
Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act. No other appeal
shall be permitted. The appeal period shall commence upon the date of mailing of any preliminary
or final decision, or upon posting, if posting is the only notice a party with standing receives under
the terms of this chapter.
D. Prohibitions. Because of the relationship of groundwater to stability, the discharge of
collected surface water or storm water to the ground surface or subsurface is prohibited on sites
within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. In addition, the following construction,
buildings, or improvements are hereby prohibited within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard
area:
1. Swimming pools or hot tubs.
2. Ponds or other artificial impoundments of water.
3. Watering or irrigation systems.
4. Temporary or permanent stockpile of fill on top or bottom of slopes.
5. Rockeries.
E. Waiver. The prohibitions established in paragraph D above shall apply unless the property
owner requests a waiver based upon the written analysis of a geotechnical engineer which clearly
establishes that the proposed improvement will have no reasonable likelihood of triggering or
otherwise contributing to any landslide hazard or earth subsidence risk either on the site or in the
neighboring earth subsidence or landslide hazard area.
Packet Page 217 of 302
19-34
In any review or appeal of the director’s or building official’s denial of a waiver to construct an
otherwise prohibited improvement, the burden of proof shall always be upon the applicant to
establish by a clear preponderance of the evidence, that no such risk will be created by the
improvement. Any geotechnical engineering report provided in any review shall consider not only
the risk incurred due to or during construction of the otherwise prohibited improvement, but also
the potential impacts due to failure to maintain the improvement, damage through reasonably
foreseeable events such as earthquakes or other acts of God, or the reasonably foreseeable
negligence of the owner or future owners. The director may utilize peer review consultants.
19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and
final geotechnical report.
A. Site clearing and grading. The owner/applicant or contractor shall secure the building
official’s approval before entering an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area site with
excavating or other grading and clearing equipment to clear, remove trees or grade for any purpose
including the creation of access to the site.
The building official may condition such access approval if site conditions are warranted and when
discretionary approval permits are required. As part of the approval process the building official
may impose conditions that address site work issues; such measures could include but are not
limited to limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the dryer season between May and the
end of September, or sequencing activities such as the installation of drainage systems well in
advance of construction.
Requests for early site access in advance of building permit approval or in the time period between
October 1st and April 30th for any purpose shall be submitted to the building official accompanied
by written concurrence of the owner/applicant’s geotechnical engineer of record.
The building official may utilize peer review consultants to determine whether the request is based
on generally accepted engineering practice and is reasonable with regard to time-frame to complete
the work, types of equipment proposed to perform the work, length of exposure of slopes, and
adequacy of site monitoring and temporary erosion control measures. When such peer review is
utilized the applicant is responsible for the peer review fee.
B. Reporting authority. The owner/applicant shall retain a geotechnical engineer to monitor
the site during construction. The owner/applicant shall preferably retain the geotechnical engineer
who prepared the final geotechnical report in the plan set submittal and who has reviewed the
approved plans and specifications.
If a different geotechnical engineering consultant is retained by the owner/applicant, the new
geotechnical engineer shall submit a letter to the director stating that he or she has read all reports
and recommendations and reviews to date and state whether or not he or she agrees with the
opinions and recommendations of the original geotechnical report and peer review comments.
Further recommendations, signed and sealed by the new geotechnical engineer, and supporting
data, shall be provided should there be exceptions or changes to the original recommendations that
would effect the approved plans.
C. Construction monitoring, special inspections.
Packet Page 218 of 302
19-35
1. Inspection requirements. During the period from October 1st to April 30th, when on
site, the owner/applicant or designated erosion sedimentation control (ESC) site supervisor shall
perform erosion and sedimentation control inspections. Records of installed ESC facilities shall be
maintained by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor and copies of all ESC records shall
be provided to City inspectors upon request.
ESC facilities on inactive sites (sites where no work will be performed for more than three (3)
consecutive days) shall be inspected weekly by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor.
During all other times of the year, weekly inspections by the ESC site supervisor are required and
shall be recorded.
2. Weekly field reports. The geotechnical engineer shall monitor, during construction,
compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including; site excavation,
shoring, temporary erosion control, soil support for foundation, piles, sub drainage installation, soil
compaction and other geotechnical aspects of the construction. Unless otherwise approved by the
director, the specific recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be implemented
by the owner/applicant. Omissions or deviations from the approved geotechnical report and civil
plans shall be highlighted to the city in a separate report. All reports shall be submitted to the city
on a weekly basis for review. Failure to submit required reports may result in the issuance of a stop
work order.
3. Storm events. During all work periods, special inspections shall be performed after
storm events as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(Q). The storm event report shall be provided within
one week of the event.
D. Final construction report. The geotechnical engineer of record shall prepare a final written
report to be submitted to the building official, stating that based upon his or her professional
opinion, site observations and final site grading that the completed development substantially
complies with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related
permit requirements as shown on the approved plans.
Substantially complies means that the completed development offers at least the level of stability
and safety, on and off site, as was afforded by the original recommendations and report.
Recommendations to the owner/applicant shall be included in the report for future monitoring and
maintenance of the property including drainage, tightlines, catch basins, berms, retaining wall
drainage, hazard mitigation improvements, slopes, bluffs, vegetation, and permanent erosion
control that effect slope stability over time. Occupancy of the residence shall not be granted until
the report has been reviewed and accepted by the building official.
Packet Page 219 of 302
19-36
Chapter 19.15
MECHANICAL CODE AND
FUEL GAS CODE
Sections:
19.15.000 International Mechanical Code and International Fuel Gas Code adopted.
19.15.005 Section amendments.
19.15.010 Work exempt from permit.
19.15.000 International Mechanical Code and International Fuel Gas Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.190 and 19.27.020, the 2006 Edition of the
International Mechanical Code (IMC) as well as the 2003 Edition of the International Fuel and Gas
Code (IFGC) including the following appendices: A (Sizing and Capacities of Gas Piping), B
(Sizing of Venting Systems Serving Appliances Equipped with Draft Hoods, Category 1
Appliances, and Appliances Listed For Use and Type B Vents), C (Exit Terminals of Mechanical
Draft and Direct-Vent Venting Systems), except for Section 109, Appeals, which is replaced by
Chapter 19.80 ECDC, published by the International Code Council together with the state
amendments set forth in Chapter 51-52 WAC, are adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the
mechanical code and fuel gas code of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.15.005 Section amendments.
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 106.2 Work exempt from permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.15.010.
2. Section 106.4.3 Expiration.
a. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this
code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit
is not commenced and granted final approval within 180 days from the date of such permit.
Once expired, a new permit with full fees shall be obtained before work is recommenced.
b. Mechanical permits issued in conjunction with a main building permit
may be extended to expire with the main building permit and may be extended with provisions
afforded to the main building permit.
3. Section 106.4.4 Extensions. Deleted.
4. Section 106.5 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC.
5. Section 109 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.15.010 Work exempt from permit.
IMC Section 106.2 is amended as follows:
Packet Page 220 of 302
19-37
Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization
for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other
laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. A building permit shall not be required for the following
subject to stated limitations in areas of the city subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10
ECDC:
A. Gas:
1. Portable heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances.
2. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or
make such equipment unsafe.
3. Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and
are not interconnected to a power grid.
B. Mechanical:
1. Portable heating appliances.
2. Portable ventilation appliances.
3. Portable cooling unit.
4. Steam, hot or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment
regulated by this code.
5. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or
make such equipment unsafe.
6. Portable evaporative cooler.
7. Self-contained refrigeration systems containing ten (10) pounds or less of
refrigerant or that are actuated by motors of one (1) horsepower or less.
8. Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and
are not interconnected to a power grid.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 221 of 302
19-38
Chapter 19.20
PLUMBING CODE
Sections:
19.20.000 Uniform Plumbing Code adopted.
19.20.005 Section amendments.
19.20.010 Evidence of potable water.
19.20.000 Uniform Plumbing Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.190 and 19.27.020, the Uniform Plumbing Code
(UPC), 2006 Edition, including Appendix G (Graywater Systems for Single-Family Dwellings),
published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, together with the
state amendments set forth in WAC Chapter 51-56 and 51-57 are adopted by reference as if fully
set forth as the plumbing code for the city of Edmonds, with the exception of fuel-gas piping being
superseded by the International Fuel Gas Code as described in Chapter 19.15 ECDC, and the
amendments contained herein. The 2006 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards is also
adopted by reference as if fully set forth, pursuant to Chapter 51-57 WAC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.20.005 Section amendments.
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 102.4 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
2. Section 103.3.4 Expiration.
a. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this
code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit
is not commenced and granted final approval within 180 days from the date of such permit.
Once expired, a new permit with full fees shall be obtained before work is recommenced.
b. Plumbing permits issued in conjunction with a main building permit may
be extended to expire with the main building permit and may be extended with provisions
afforded to the main building permit.
3. Section 103.4 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC.
4. Section 103.6.4 Septic or sewer system connection.
a. No occupancy permit shall be issued for the occupancy of any building
or structure until connection to the city public sewer system has been verified or an approved
sewage septic system has been installed and approved.
B. Chapter 7 Sanitary Drainage.
1. Part II Building sewers. Deleted.
a. Section 713.0 Sewer required. Deleted. Building sewers located more
than two feet from the exterior wall of the building to the property line are regulated by the city
public works director.
2. Section 714.0 Damage to public sewer or private sewage disposal system.
Deleted.
Packet Page 222 of 302
19-39
3. Section 715.0 Building sewer materials. Deleted.
4. Section 716.0 Markings. Deleted.
5. Section 717.0 Size of building sewers. Deleted.
6. Section 718.0 Grade, support and protection of building sewers. Deleted.
7. Section 719.0 Cleanouts. Deleted.
8. Section 720.0 Sewer and water pipes. Deleted.
9. Section 721.0 Location. Deleted.
10. Section 722.0 Abandoned sewers and sewage disposal facilities. Deleted.
11. Section 723.0 Building sewer test. Deleted.
12. Table 7-7 Minimum horizontal distance required from building sewer. Deleted.
13. Table 7-8 Maximum/minimum fixture unit loading on building sewer piping.
Deleted.
C. Chapter 10 Traps and Interceptors.
1. UPC 1014.0, Grease traps and interceptors. Deleted. Grease traps and all
interceptors are regulated by city Ordinances 3401 and 3487. ECC Chapter 7.90.
2. UPC 1015.0 Food waste disposal and dishwasher prohibited. Deleted.
3. UPC 1016.0 Sand interceptors. Deleted.
4. UPC 1017.0 Oil and flammable liquids interceptors. Deleted.
D. Chapter 11 Storm drainage. Replaced by Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
E. Chapter 12, Fuel piping. Replaced by Chapter 19.15 ECDC.
F. Chapter 15 Firestop protection. Deleted.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.20.010 Evidence of potable water.
Prior to the issuance of any building permit for new development, the building official shall require
substantive evidence of an adequate potable water supply from the purveyor of water to the site for
which a building permit is requested. For those areas lying within the service area of the city of
Edmonds water utility, the notification from a duly authorized representative of the city’s water
utility shall be sufficient; provided, nothing herein shall be interpreted to prevent the city or any of
its water purveyors from declaring a moratorium or other water emergency limiting or otherwise
restricting the availability of adequate potable water. Applicants relying on a well shall provide a
copy of applicable state approval for the appropriation and a current test of water quality by a
qualified laboratory. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 223 of 302
19-40
Chapter 19.25
FIRE CODE
Sections:
19.25.000 Adoption of life safety and maintenance codes.
19.25.005 Section amendments.
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
19.25.015 Definitions.
19.25.020 Permits.
19.25.025 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
19.25.030 Charges for fire review and inspection.
19.25.035 Fire extinguishers and systems service.
19.25.040 Automatic sprinkler systems.
19.25.045 Modifications, interpretations, and appeals.
19.25.050 Fire protection water supplies. Water mains and fire hydrants.
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
19.25.065 Mains and service lines.
19.25.070 Hydrant specifications.
19.25.075 Penalties.
19.25.000 Adoption of life safety and maintenance codes.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the 2006 Edition of the
International Fire Code (IFC) as published by the International Code Council including the state
amendments set forth in Chapter 51-54 WAC, including reference standards of the National Fire
Protection Association and the following Appendices: B (Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings), C
(Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution), E (Hazard Categories) and F (Hazard Ranking) are
adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the fire code of the city of Edmonds. The International
Existing Building Code is not adopted and all references to that code shall be disregarded. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.005 Section amendments.
The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows:
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and other enforcement
agencies shall have authority to render necessary assistance in the investigation of fires and
enforcement of the life safety provisions of this code when requested to do so by the fire code
official.
2. Section 104.11.2 Obstructing operations. No person shall obstruct the
operations of the fire department in connection with extinguishment control or investigation of
any fire, or actions relative to other emergencies, or disobey any lawful command of the fire
chief or officer of the fire department in charge of the emergency, or any part thereof, or any
lawful order of a police officer assisting the fire department.
Packet Page 224 of 302
19-41
3. Section 108, Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
B. Chapter 5 Fire Service Features (Fire Apparatus Access Roads). The following sections
are adopted as originally set forth in the IFC:
1. Section 503.1 Where required.
2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities.
3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access.
4. Section 503.1.3 High-piled storage.
5. Section 503.2 Specifications.
6. Section 503.3 Marking.
7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads.
C. Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems.
1. Section 901.6.1 Standards. Fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and
maintained in accordance with the referenced standards listed in Table 901.6.1 and this
chapter. For the sole purpose of inspecting, testing and maintenance of water-based fire
protection systems in accordance with NFPA 25, all existing water-based fire protection
systems shall be considered new as of July 1, 2004.
2. Section 904.11.7 Existing commercial cooking systems. Existing fire
suppression systems for commercial cooking not in compliance with Underwriters Laboratory
Standard 300 shall be replaced with a conforming system by July 1, 2005.
D. Chapter 33 Explosives and Fireworks.
1. Section 3301.1.3, Fireworks. Exceptions No. 3 and No. 4 replaced by Chapter 5.27
ECC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
A. There is established in the city fire department a department of fire prevention, to be
supervised by the fire code official.
B. The IFC shall be enforced by the department of fire prevention.
C. The fire code official shall be the fire marshal who shall be in charge of the department of
fire prevention and who shall be appointed by the mayor on the basis of applicable civil service
rules and regulations for the city.
D. The fire marshal may recommend to the fire chief the employment of technical officers,
inspectors and other employees. If approved, technical officers and inspectors shall be hired or
assigned for that purpose.
E. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor. It shall contain all proceedings under this
code, with other statistics as the fire marshal of the city fire department may wish to include. The
fire marshal may also recommend any changes to the code. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 225 of 302
19-42
19.25.015 Definitions.
A. Whenever the term “fire code official” is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal.
B. Whenever the term “chief administrative officer” or “fire chief,” is used in the IFC, it shall
mean the fire chief.
C. Whenever the term “legal representative of the jurisdiction” is used in the IFC, it shall mean
the city attorney.
D. Whenever the word “jurisdiction” is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.020 Permits.
A. Whenever the IFC requires an operational permit, the application for the permit shall be
accompanied by an application fee of $30.00. All permits shall be renewed annually unless a
specific time period is set forth when the permit is granted. No permit shall be transferable and
each permit shall be issued on a single job, transaction, owner, or occupancy basis, except that the
fire marshal is authorized to consolidate permits for a single location, building, or unit.
B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with the activity requires a fire
safety inspection in excess of the time estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an inspection fee
equal to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be charged pursuant to ECDC
19.25.030.
C. The following activities regulated pursuant to the IFC shall not require a permit to be issued
under this section. Nothing herein shall be interpreted, however, to exempt these activities from
other permits or licenses required by law or ordinance. The accepted activities are:
1. Carnivals and fairs;
2. Open flames and candles;
3. Open burning (see ECC 5.22.030);
4. Fire hydrants and water control valves;
5. Private fire hydrants;
6. Roof-top heliports;
7. Waste handling.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.025 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
A. Water main replacement to city standards, plans and specifications will be accomplished by
the city in accordance with the city’s water comprehensive plan and adopted capital improvement
program. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the replacement (upgrade) of
the existing public main (including fire hydrants and appurtenances) to city standard when
identified by the city engineer as a condition of development approval. The city will pay the
Packet Page 226 of 302
19-43
difference in material costs only between six inches and the size that is required to be installed only
when the existing system is a looped system.
B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is required in order for any person
or entity other than fire department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant.
C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances to properties not previously
served shall be sized in accordance with the city’s water comprehensive plan, built to city standard
and shall be at the benefited property owner’s or developer’s expense.
D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands relating to a particular property or
development shall be installed at the developer’s or property owner’s expense.
E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections C and D of this section provide service
or benefits to properties other than owned by the water main installer, latecomer agreements may
be arranged between the city and the installer for the construction and dedication of the water
facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35.91 RCW. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.030 Charges for fire review and inspection.
A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire department safety inspection.
The cost of the permit may include an estimate of the normal time associated with the fire
inspection. Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the estimate of time
established within the ordinance is exceeded by the actual time spent inspecting a premises,
location or activity, the actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The
administrative services director is authorized to establish on an annual basis, in conjunction with or
immediately following the budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with the provision
of services by reasonable classifications of city employees.
B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in addition to the permit fee
associated with such activity. Licenses and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection
charges include, but are not limited to, public amusements licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.32
ECC, cabaret dances licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment facilities
licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses issued pursuant to
Chapter 4.80 ECC.
C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency of the city of Edmonds
operating within the city’s general fund. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.035 Fire extinguishers and systems service.
A. A service permit or a current license/certification by an approved testing authority shall be
required for the servicing testing and maintenance of fire extinguishers and fire extinguishing
systems.
B. Applicants for a permit to service fire extinguishers and fire extinguishing systems shall be
required to take and pass an examination to be established by the fire marshal. Permit fees are set
forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. If the permit is not issued, because the examination is not held or
Packet Page 227 of 302
19-44
the applicant fails to complete the examination, a refund of the permit fee will be made to the
applicant.
C. Service permits shall be issued by the fire marshal. The permit may be revoked at any time
the permittee fails to comply with city, state or federal regulations. The permit is not transferable
and shall be void if the permit holder changes business address or employers.
D. The permit shall expire after five years. The permittee shall then obtain a new permit if he
wishes to continue servicing fire extinguishers or fire extinguishing systems.
E. The fire marshal may waive permit requirements for applicant when provided with proof of
current license or current certification by an approved testing authority. The fire marshal may, as
often as necessary, inquire with licensing authority regarding licensing and certification testing
methods, requirements and dates of effectiveness, prior to approval for work performed.
F. A certificate of inspection for every system test, maintenance, activation and repair shall be
forwarded to the fire marshal upon completion of service. One copy of that record shall be
maintained on the premises.
G. Appeals regarding the administration of the fire extinguisher and fire-extinguishing system
service permit and license approval process shall file their appeal with the fire chief and be heard
before the board of appeals pursuant to Chapter 19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.040 Automatic sprinkler systems.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained throughout every building
constructed under the International Residential Code containing five or more attached dwelling
units. Residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in accordance with their
approved listing in the dwelling. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.045 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
A. The fire marshal may modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this chapter on written
application by the owner or lessee when there are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict
letter of the code. Approved modifications, including alternative materials and methods, shall
observe the spirit of the code, secure the public safety and do substantial justice. The particulars of
an approved modification shall be written by the fire marshal and kept in the records of the
department. A signed copy shall be promptly given to the applicant.
B. Fire department modifications and code interpretations shall be maintained in writing
so as to aid in conformance and uniform application to the intent of ruling fire and life safety
related codes, ordinances, and standards.
C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied
for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and
meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from
the decision of the fire marshal to the fire chief. Such appeals shall be governed by the procedures
set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 228 of 302
19-45
19.25.050 Water mains and fire hydrants. Fire protection water supplies.
All fire hydrants, water main and appurtenance installations shall meet the provisions of this
chapter as well as other applicable plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of Edmonds, as a
condition of approval of subdivisions and building permits. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city.
B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Public
hydrants spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes.
C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public hydrants shall be spaced no more
than 600 feet apart. If dead-end streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet
long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 600
feet.
D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire hydrants shall be spaced an average
of 300 feet apart. If dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet long,
additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 300 feet.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use of the city for inspection and
testing at reasonable times, and for fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall be
connected to the city water main through a privately owned and maintained double detector check
valve assembly.
B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located so that a portion is more than
200 feet from a street, as measured along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire hydrants
located at the building. Single-family dwellings with a fire-flow calculation area greater than
4,800 square feet within the exterior walls may require a private hydrant.
C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per minute may have fire hydrants on
one side of the building only. There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any building
larger than 5,000 square feet in the first floor area including covered parking and storage. When
the required fire flow is 3,000 gallons per minute or greater, the fire hydrants shall be served by a
looped main around the building or complex of buildings.
D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around the perimeter line, 50 feet out
of the buildings. All hydrants shall be placed in locations accessible to fire department vehicles
adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. The fire marshal shall determine the location of fire
hydrants depending on utility, topography and building location for maximum fire protection. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.065 Mains and service lines.
A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied by not less than six-inch looped
water mains. All hydrants in areas other than single-family residential shall be supplied by not less
Packet Page 229 of 302
19-46
than eight-inch looped water mains. Dead-end water mains to hydrants shall be at least eight
inches in diameter, with the exception of mains up to 50 feet long which may be no less than six
inches in diameter.
B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be no less than six inches in
diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less than
eight inches in diameter.
C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in the public right-of-way, are
improved to permanent street or highway improvement standards, any water mains in the public
right-of-way of said streets or highways that are substandard as to size or material according to
applicable city standards shall be replaced with ductile iron water mains conforming to applicable
city standards and plans. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.070 Hydrant specifications.
A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely below grade) is prohibited.
B. Fire hydrants shall have two two-and-one-half-inch hose outlets and one four-and-one-half-
inch pumper outlet. All outlets’ ports shall have national standard thread. Additionally, the pumper
outlet shall be provided with a four-inch Storz adapter. Fire hydrants shall meet the American
Water Works Association, Standard No. C-502 and current city standards.
C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with generally accepted
engineering practices and city standards, and to the approval of the city engineer, who shall also
approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There shall be a foot valve installed
between the service main and the hydrant sufficient to permit the repair and replacement of the
hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be installed to city standards. The
location of all such valves installed shall be properly and accurately marked on as-built plans or
drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail, two copies of which shall be furnished to
the public works department. Valves shall be furnished with a standard valve box.
D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade with the lowest outlet of the
hydrant at least 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of clear area
around the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on the control valve. The
pumper port shall face the street, as determined by the fire marshal.
E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from damage, the fire marshal may require
hydrants to be protected by two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet long, made
either of reinforced concrete or steel.
F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to these requirements, they shall
be replaced with conforming hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established by the
city’s comprehensive plan.
G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or perform any action which
results in the obstruction of a fire hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route of
approach. The owner-occupant of any area in which a hydrant is located shall be responsible for
Packet Page 230 of 302
19-47
removing weed and tree growth from around the hydrant for a distance of not less than five feet.
The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual area around the hydrant.
H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be accomplished by city capital
contract, developers (as a condition of development) or public works department employees. All
installations are to be approved by the city engineer.
I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves and hydrants shall be pressure
tested, purified, flushed and sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works
Association, Standard No. C-502. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.25.075 Penalties.
A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC including those standards of the
National Fire Protection Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and amended
herein or fails to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order made
thereunder, or who builds in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted
and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who fails to comply with
such an order as affirmed or modified by decision of the city’s board of appeals or by a court of
competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally for each and every such violation
and noncompliance, respectively, be guilty of a gross misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC
5.50.020.
B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it
to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects
within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited conditions
exist or are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the above penalty
shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 231 of 302
19-48
Chapter 19.30
ENERGY CODE
Sections:
19.30.000 State Energy Code adopted.
19.30.000 State Energy Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27A.022, 19.27A.025 and 19.27A.045, the Washington
State Energy Code, 2006 Edition, is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the energy
code of the city of Edmonds, pursuant to RCW 19.27 and RCW 34.05 together with state
amendments set forth in Chapter 51-11 WAC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 232 of 302
19-49
Chapter 19.35
VENTILATION CODE
Sections:
19.35.000 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code adopted.
19.35.005 Conflicts with other codes.
19.35.000 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.020 and 19.27.190, the 2006 Edition of the
Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code is hereby adopted by reference as if
fully set forth as the ventilation code of the city of Edmonds, pursuant to RCW 19.27.190 and
together with the state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-13 WAC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.35.005 Conflicts with other codes.
A. In addition to the requirements of this code, buildings shall conform to the provisions of the
State Building Code, Chapter 19.27 RCW, and Chapters 51-50, 51-52, 51-54 and 51-56 WAC. In
case of conflicts between the IBC, UPC, IMC and IFC as adopted and amended in Chapters 51-50,
51-52, 51-54 and 51-56 WAC, the provisions of Chapter 51-13 WAC shall govern. This code is not
intended to abridge any safety or health requirements under any other applicable codes or
ordinances.
B. Where, in any specific case, different sections of this code specify different materials,
methods of construction or other requirements, the most restrictive shall govern. Where there is a
conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the specific requirement shall be
applicable. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 233 of 302
19-50
Chapter 19.40
DANGEROUS BUILDINGS CODE
Sections:
19.40.000 Dangerous buildings code adopted.
19.40.005 Purpose and code conflicts.
19.40.010 Section amendments.
19.40.000 Dangerous buildings code adopted.
The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, as published by the
International Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as
the dangerous building code for the city of Edmonds, and the amendments contained herein. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.40.005 Purpose and code conflicts.
A. It is the purpose of this code to provide a just, equitable and practicable method, to be
cumulative with and in addition to any other remedy provided by the International Building Code,
International Residential Code, Uniform Housing Code or otherwise available by law, whereby
buildings or structures which from any cause endanger the life, limb, health, property, safety or
welfare of the general public or their occupants may be required to be repaired, vacated or
demolished. The purpose of this code is not to create or otherwise establish or designate any
particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by the
terms of this code.
B. If there is a conflict between the building code, dangerous building code, plumbing code,
mechanical code or housing code, then the conditions, requirements, provisions or terms which
provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and
shall control. In addition to the remedies adopted in such code, criminal penalties may be imposed
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.85 ECDC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.40.010 Section amendments.
A. Chapter 2 Enforcement.
1. Section 205 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
B. Chapter 3 Definitions.
1. Section 302, Dangerous Building, is hereby amended by the addition of a new
subsection 19 to read as follows:
19. Whenever a building or portion thereof is determined to be contaminated
with toxic chemicals. A rebuttable presumption is hereby created that a building is
contaminated with toxic chemicals if such a determination is made by the Snohomish County
Health District, by the Washington State Department of Ecology, or by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, in accordance with such criteria and standards as such public agencies shall
establish. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 234 of 302
19-51
Chapter 19.45
HOUSING CODE
Sections:
19.45.000 Uniform Housing Code adopted.
19.45.005 Purpose and code conflicts.
19.45.000 Uniform Housing Code adopted.
The Uniform Housing Code (UHC), 1997 Edition, as published by the International Conference of
Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the housing code for the
city of Edmonds, subject to the following amendment: Section 203, Appeals, is replaced by
Chapter 19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.45.005 Purpose and code conflicts.
A. The purpose of this code is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health,
property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the use and occupancy, location, and
maintenance of all residential buildings and structures within this jurisdiction.
B. In cases where the Uniform Housing Code and the current adopted International Building
Code and International Residential Code conflict or, if there is a conflict between the building code,
dangerous buildings code, plumbing code, mechanical code or housing code, then the conditions,
requirements, provisions or terms which provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the
greatest public safety shall be observed and shall control. In addition to the remedies adopted in
such code, criminal penalties may be imposed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.85 ECDC.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 235 of 302
19-52
Chapter 19.50
HISTORIC BUILDING CODE
Sections:
19.50.000 State Historic Building Code adopted.
19.50.005 Purpose, scope and code conflicts.
19.50.010 Fully complete application.
19.50.015 Concurrent review.
19.50.020 Architectural design review – Optional vesting.
19.50.000 State Historic Building Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.120 and 19.27.074, and WSR 91-01-103, the 1991
Edition of the State Historic Building Code (SHBC) as printed and distributed by the Washington
Association of Building Officials, including state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-19 WAC, is
hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the historic building code of the city of Edmonds
subject to the following amendment: WAC 51-19-280, Appeals, is replaced by Chapter 19.80
ECDC. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.50.005 Purpose, scope and code conflicts.
A. The provisions of the SHBC shall constitute the minimum standards for the preservation,
restoration and related reconstruction, rehabilitation, strengthening, or relocation of buildings or
structures, changes of occupancy and alteration or repair of designated historic buildings. This
code applies only to designated historic buildings deemed so by the Edmonds historic preservation
commission. It is the purpose of the SHBC to establish regulations and code alternatives to
preserve original or restored architectural elements and features so that any alterations to the
historic building or structure will result in a building or structure that will be less hazardous, based
on minimum life safety and fire codes, than the existing building.
B. If there is a conflict between the International Building Code, Uniform Code for the
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, International Fuel Gas Code, Uniform Plumbing Code,
International Mechanical Code or Uniform Housing Code, then the conditions, requirements,
provisions or terms which provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public
safety shall be observed and shall control. In addition to the remedies adopted in such code,
criminal penalties may be imposed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.85 ECDC. [Ord. 3502
§ 2, 2004].
19.50.010 Fully complete application.
In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant’s rights shall vest
when a fully complete building permit application is filed pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.50.015 Concurrent review.
An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review
services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any
Packet Page 236 of 302
19-53
necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing pursuant to ECDC
19.00.020. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.50.020 Architectural design review – Optional vesting.
An applicant of a designated historic building may submit an augmented ADB application pursuant
to ECDC 19.00.025. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 237 of 302
19-54
Chapter 19.55
ELECTRICAL CODE
Sections:
19.55.000 National Electrical Code adopted.
19.55.005 When code effective.
19.55.010 Nonliability.
19.55.015 Conflicts – How resolved.
19.55.000 National Electrical Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the National Electrical Code, 2002
Edition, as published by the National Fire Protection Association, is hereby adopted as the
electrical code for the city of Edmonds subject to the amendments made herein. The State of
Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Electrical Inspection Section, Rules and
Regulations for Installing Electric Wiring and Equipment and Administrative Rules, 2002 Edition,
is hereby adopted as part of the electrical code of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.55.005 When code effective.
If the state of Washington, through its duly designated electrical inspector or inspectors, for any
reason fails to continue to inspect electrical installation, license the same or provide the standards,
the provisions of the Edmonds electrical code as amended shall be applicable to all electrical
installation in the city as if the state of Washington had not exercised jurisdiction of any kind.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.55.010 Nonliability.
This chapter shall not be construed to relieve or lessen the responsibility of any person owning,
operating or installing any electrical equipment for damages to anyone injured by a defect of the
equipment, nor shall the city or its agent be held as assuming any such liability by reason of the
inspection under this code or the certificate of inspection issued by the building department. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.55.015 Conflicts – How resolved.
If there is any conflict between the electrical code of the city, the National Electrical Code and/or
the rules and regulations as set forth by the state of Washington for electric wires and equipment,
then the conditions, requirements, provisions or terms which provide, in the opinion of the building
official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and shall control. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 238 of 302
19-55
Chapter 19.60
MOVING BUILDINGS
Sections:
19.60.000 Permit required.
19.60.005 Applicability.
19.60.010 Application requirements.
19.60.015 Pre-move inspection requirements and building upgrades.
19.60.020 Correction of defects.
19.60.000 Permit required.
Any person who proposes to move an existing building into or through the city of Edmonds shall,
before the move, apply for and obtain a moving permit from the building official. A moving permit
is separate from, and in addition to, any and all other permits required to bring the moved building
into compliance with current adopted codes and city regulations. Separate permit approvals for
grading, shoring, foundation, remodeling, repair or alteration may be imposed to bring the building
to current adopted code standards and zoning compliance for height and setbacks. [Ord. 3502 § 2,
2004].
19.60.005 Applicability.
Building or structures moved into or within the city shall comply with the provisions of this code
including the current adopted editions of the following codes: International Building Code,
International Residential Code, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, Uniform
Plumbing Code, Washington State Energy Code, Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, State
Historic Building Code, Uniform Housing Code, and applicable state WAC amendments. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.60.010 Application requirements.
A. In order to obtain permits to move any building through, along, or across the streets or any
public place within city limits, the building official shall determine permit submittal requirements
which, at a minimum, shall contain:
1. Proposed route;
2. Location of any overhead utility lines or traffic signals along with their height along
the route; and
3. Dimensions of building proposed to be moved.
B. The permit application shall be reviewed by the building official, public works director,
police chief, traffic engineer, fire department and any other affected city department. If the
proposed moving will unduly interfere with the rights of the public as determined by the city
engineer or designee, the permit shall be denied. Denial of the application by one department shall
constitute denial of the permit by the city.
C. A performance bond or frozen fund, pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, in an amount to be
determined by the building official shall be posted prior to permit issuance guaranteeing the
Packet Page 239 of 302
19-56
completion of all required site development improvements or site clean-up and/or repair of damage
to public property no later than 180 days after the permit is issued. The bond or frozen fund will be
exonerated upon final project approval provided all required site restoration and/or improvements
are installed, inspected and approved to city standards.
D. The moving contractor shall be state licensed and carry general public liability insurance for
the amount no less than $1,000,000, valid during entire building moving operations, and the
insurance policy shall name the city as an additional named insured, against the injury, death,
property damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city’s involvement in the permitting process
for the project.
E. As a condition of obtaining a moving permit, the moving contractor shall assume all
liability for any damage to public property by such moving operations. Repair of damage to any
public property improvement shall be completed under a valid permit within 30 days of date of
notice. Emergency repair work performed by city crews to repair damage to public improvements
shall be charged against the moving contractor. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.60.015 Pre-move inspection requirements and building upgrades.
A. Upon application and payment of the building moving permit fee, the building official shall
notify the applicant of the date and time of his pre-move inspection. The pre-move inspection shall
be made at the original location of the building before it is moved.
B. The applicant shall remove from the building as much of the interior wall and ceiling
coverings as is necessary in the judgment of the building official to conduct a thorough inspection
of the wiring, plumbing and structural features of the building. The building official shall
determine what structural, energy, ventilation, plumbing, mechanical and life-safety upgrades shall
be imposed on any building moved into or within city limits in compliance with current adopted
codes. Designated historic buildings are also subject to provisions of Chapter 19.50 ECDC. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.60.020 Correction of defects.
If, at or after the time of the inspection, the building official notifies the applicant that any portion
of the building, electrical wiring or rough plumbing is in any way in violation of the ordinances of
the city of Edmonds, so that compliance will require a replacement of any parts or materials used,
then any defective parts or materials shall be removed from the building before it is moved. Any
corrections required to comply with the ECDC, IBC and IRC shall be completed and inspected
before final approval and occupancy is granted. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 240 of 302
19-57
Chapter 19.65
MARINAS
Sections:
19.65.000 Application.
19.65.005 Building code – Compliance required.
19.65.010 Design live loads.
19.65.015 Materials.
19.65.020 Area and location requirements.
19.65.025 Fire requirements.
19.65.000 Application.
The provisions of this chapter apply to the construction, changes, repair and use of a small boat
marina providing covered floating boat moorage within the city. A marina is a basin of safe
anchorage providing moorage for small vessels. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.65.005 Building code – Compliance required.
All construction on or in connection with a marina shall comply with all the provisions of ECDC
Title 19 including permits, permit fees and penalties and all other applicable ordinances of the city
and other applicable laws. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.65.010 Design live loads.
A. Decks. Float decks shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per square foot
minimum.
B. Roofs. The roof structures shall have a design live load of at least 25 pounds per square
foot minimum.
C. Ramps. The ramps to floats shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per square
foot minimum. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.65.015 Materials.
A. Roofs. Roof coverings shall be non-combustible.
B. Floats. Floating structures and floats shall be material of a type approved by the building
official. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.65.020 Area and location requirements.
A. Length of Floats. The maximum length of any combination of floats shall be 500 feet from
the shore end of the gangplank to the outer end of the main float. A main float is a center or side
float connected by a ramp to the shore, being fixed laterally by a system of piling but allowed to
move vertically, and may have finger floats connected at intervals.
Packet Page 241 of 302
19-58
B. Length of Roofs. The maximum length of any roof over floats shall be 400 feet, measured
along a main float. At least 75 percent of the exterior walls shall be open. The maximum area
covered shall be 30,000 square feet over any single main float area.
C. Separation. The minimum separation of covered moorage shall be 20 feet.
D. Floats, piers, and walkways shall provide an aisle not less than 44 inches in width. [Ord.
3502 § 2, 2004].
19.65.025 Fire requirements.
A. Hydrants. The maximum distance from any point on a float system to an approved fire
hydrant shall be 600 feet, except for fuel floats. Approved fire extinguishers shall be placed at
covered moorage along the main float system at intervals not exceeding 120 feet from any single
covered boat stall.
B. Fuel Floats.
1. Fuel floats shall be constructed of gas-resistant flotation material and shall be
separated from other floats by at least 80 feet of open water.
2. All fuel storage tanks shall be located underground.
3. All fuel lines shall be provided with flexible connections from shore to floating
facilities.
4. Fire extinguishers shall be provided near fuel dispensers as approved by the
Edmonds fire department.
5. Gangplank access from shore to fuel floats shall be within 175 feet of fuel
dispensers.
6. Fresh water taps shall be available on fuel floats.
7. All portions of a fuel float shall be located within 300 feet of a fire hydrant.
8. Moorage at any fuel float shall be prohibited and unlawful except during the shortest
time necessary to take on fuel. Moorage shall be unlawful at any fuel float at any time the fuel
pumps are not open for business and physically attended by the fuel pump proprietor or, his agent,
or employee, or port tenant trained to a fire department approved environmental and safety
standard. It shall be the independent responsibility of the fuel pump proprietor, vessel operator,
and vessel owner to comply with this subsection and each said person or class of persons shall be
subject to the penalties of ECC 5.50.020 for any and all violations hereof.
C. Fire Protection Standard Adopted. The “Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and
Boatyards” 2000 2006 Edition of the National Fire Protection Association Publication No. 303 is
hereby adopted to provide the minimum acceptable level of safety to life and property from fire and
electrical hazards at marinas and boatyards. In the event of any conflict between provisions of the
fire and electrical codes of the city of Edmonds as adopted by this title, the fire and electrical codes
shall prevail. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 242 of 302
19-59
Chapter 19.70
FEES
Sections:
19.70.000 Scope.
19.70.005 Payment of fees.
19.70.010 Schedule of permit fees.
19.70.015 Establishing building construction valuation.
19.70.020 Work commencing before permit issuance.
19.70.025 Refunds.
19.70.000 Scope.
Fees associated with ECDC Title 19 including plan review, permit, inspection and related
development or mitigation fees are established by this chapter and as set forth in ECDC 15.00.020.
Fees may be altered pursuant to city Resolution 997. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.70.005 Payment of fees.
A permit shall not be considered valid until the fees prescribed by law have been paid, nor shall an
amendment to a permit be released until the additional fee, if any, has been paid. Before issuance
of any permit authorized by this code, the building official shall collect all applicable permit fees.
Separate permits and fees shall apply as indicated elsewhere in this code and shall be collected
prior to permit issuance. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.70.010 Schedule of permit fees.
For buildings, structures, grading, gas, mechanical and plumbing systems or alterations requiring a
permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required, in accordance with this chapter and ECDC
15.00.020. Fee schedules are on file in the city clerk’s office.
A. Plan Review Fee. Before accepting a set of plans and specifications for plan review, the
building official shall collect the full plan review fee. Plan review fees shall be in addition to, and a
percentage of, the required permit fee as calculated pursuant to ECDC 19.70.015.
B. Permit Fee. Before issuing a building permit and releasing approved plans, the building
official shall collect the full building permit fees including supplemental required permit fees,
inspection fees and any additional plan review fee or violation compliance fee, development fee or
mitigation fee outstanding at the time of permit issuance. Building construction valuation shall be
determined by ECDC 19.70.015.
C. Inspection Fee. Inspection and reinspection fees shall be paid prior to any inspection by
city staff. Inspection fees are established and set forth in this chapter.
D. Related Development or Mitigation Fees. The payment of the fee for construction,
alteration, removal or demolition done in connection, or concurrently with, the work authorized by
a building permit shall not relieve the applicant or holder of the permit from the payment of other
fees that are prescribed by law. Fees for other permits or related development fees shall be as set
forth in ECDC 15.00.020. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 243 of 302
19-60
19.70.015 Establishing building construction valuation.
The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated building construction valuation at time of
application. Building construction valuation for the purpose of calculating permit fees shall include
total value of work including fair-market labor and materials with equipment needed to complete
the work, including but not limited to all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well
as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire
extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. If, in the opinion of the building
official, the building construction valuation is underestimated on the application, the building
official shall assign a building construction valuation. Permit valuation for new construction shall
be based on square footage building construction valuation as established by the building official.
[Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.70.020 Work commencing before permit issuance.
Any person who commences any work regulated by this title including work on a building,
electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system before obtaining the necessary permits shall be
subject to a violation compliance fee established by the building official pursuant to the city’s fee
schedule adopted by resolution that shall be in addition to the required permit fees. The violation
compliance fee shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The
payment of such violation compliance fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all
other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Violation compliance fees are
set forth in this chapter. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.70.025 Refunds.
The building official may authorize refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously
paid or collected. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the
permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code.
The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee
paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or
canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of
any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee no later than 180 days
after the date of fee payment. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 244 of 302
19-61
Chapter 19.75
STREET NAMES AND
ADDRESS NUMBERING
Sections:
19.75.000 Adoption of street name map and criteria.
19.75.005 Adoption of property and building numbering system and criteria.
19.75.010 Other street names and premises numbers prohibited.
19.75.000 Adoption of street name map and criteria.
A. There is hereby established a uniform system of designating street names/numbers in the
city of Edmonds. The street names/numbers are those depicted on that map entitled, “official street
map,” a copy of which has been authenticated by the mayor of the city and the attestation of the
city clerk. The map and all explanatory matter on the map is re-adopted and affirmed and by this
reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Official street name/number designations are
the responsibility of the city engineer.
B. Pursuant to ECDC 18.50.030, any change to the name or number of any street on the
official street map shall be by action of the city council approving an ordinance changing the
official street map.
C. The city engineer shall maintain and update the official street map and shall
designate/approve public and private street names/numbers in accordance with this chapter. All
approved street names/numbers shall be forwarded to the United States Postal Service (USPS),
public and private utilities, law enforcement agencies, emergency services providers, and other
persons of new or corrected street names/numbers. The city engineer shall develop policies and
guidelines for street names and numbers in accordance with the following guidelines:
1. New street designations shall be in accordance with the Snohomish County grid
system and the official street map.
2. When descriptive street names (as opposed to numerical street designations) are
allowed by subsection (C)(1) of this section, preference shall be for descriptive names with logical
relationship to locale or geographic area, and avoidance of private individual names.
3. Facilitation of map reading and indexing to assist in rapid location of streets and
addresses.
4. Avoidance of multiple and/or alternative names for single street sections and
requirement of selection of a primary street designation to assist in the Enhanced 9-1-1 grid system
for emergency services dispatching.
5. Any other appropriate and applicable standards concerning street and street
designations as well as current department of public works policies, guidelines, or rules for naming
public street as determined by the director. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.75.005 Adoption of property and building numbering system and criteria.
A. There is hereby established a uniform system for numbering properties, buildings and
primary structures in the city of Edmonds. The official building and property address map
depicting all issued property address numbers is maintained by the building official or designee.
Packet Page 245 of 302
19-62
The building official assigns, maintains and corrects addresses for the city of Edmonds and shall
notify the United States Post Service (USPS), emergency services providers and other persons of
new or corrected addresses.
B. Addresses shall conform to the numerical grid system established by Enhanced 9-1-1. The
number utilized by each building or property shall be that number within the system assigned by
the building official. Addresses are assigned based on the location of the driveway access or house
frontage to a street and only one address is allowed per building on any lot. Numbers assigned
during any previous numbering system that fit within the grid system are hereby ratified and shall
remain in full force and effect.
C. The building official shall require any address not in conformance or any address that poses
any problem or confusion for safety and emergency response be changed within 30 days of written
notification from the city of Edmonds.
D. All owners or occupants of all buildings and structures in the city of Edmonds, other than
garages or other similar buildings or structures of a secondary nature to the primary building or
structure, shall affix and maintain the officially designated premises number to the building or
structure pursuant to ECDC 19.00.005(B)(1). When topography or vegetation may obscure vision
from the street, the numerals shall be affixed as to be as reasonably visible from the street.
E. Where any commercial building, multiple-family residential structure, or other similar
structure has more than one entrance serving separate occupants, a suite designation or apartment
number shall be assigned to each entrance serving a tenant or resident in addition to the number
assigned to the principal entrance of the building or structure. The unit designations shall be
progressive as assigned in the progressive direction of the street and per the property numbering
system approved by this code.
F. All requests for a building or property address change shall be made in writing to the
building official and all of the following conditions shall be present in order for the request to be
approved:
1. An obvious error shall exist (i.e., the building was addressed off a street not
associated with the site, the building or property addresses are out of sequence, duplicate address
exists), etc.
2. The existing address could delay fire, police or emergency services from finding the
location in an emergency.
3. The fire department agrees the address change is necessary. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.75.010 Other street names and premises numbers prohibited.
It is unlawful for any owner or occupant of any premises, building or structure to display a street
name or premises number other than those officially designated pursuant to the provisions of this
chapter, subject to penalties per Chapter 5.50 ECC and Chapter 20.110 ECDC. [Ord. 3502 § 2,
2004].
Packet Page 246 of 302
19-63
Chapter 19.80
BOARD OF APPEALS
Sections:
19.80.000 Purpose and applicability.
19.80.005 Application and fee.
19.80.010 Board of appeals membership.
19.80.015 Board of appeals procedures.
19.80.020 Powers and duties of the board.
19.80.025 Appeals from decisions of the board.
19.80.030 Snohomish County regional board of appeals.
19.80.000 Purpose and applicability.
A. All properly filed appeals pursuant to the adopted codes of ECDC Title 19 shall be heard by
the board of appeals created by this chapter. The board shall have no authority to review
administrative decisions or grant modifications to the provisions of any administrative chapter as
adopted by ECDC Title 19, nor can the board waive a code requirement.
B. The board of appeals shall hear appeals from the building official’s interpretation of the
adopted building codes, determinations of suitable alternative methods and materials, and any other
appeal delegated to a board of appeals pursuant to the state building codes, including but not
limited to the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Fire
Code, the Uniform Housing Code, the State Historical Building Code, the Uniform Code for the
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, the International Fuel Gas Code, the International Mechanical
Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code and any and all other codes adopted pursuant to the direction
and authority of Chapter 19.27 RCW.
C. The provisions of the state building codes as adopted by the city are not intended to prevent
the use of any material, alternate design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by
this code, provided any alternative has been approved and its use authorized by the building official
or on appeal or request for review by the board of appeals. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.80.005 Application and fee.
An application for appeal shall be filed with the building official upon a departmental form within
10 days of the date of formal written decision. The application shall be accompanied by the
required fee as set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC and shall be complete in all aspects before the
hearing shall be scheduled. Failure to supplement an incomplete application within 10 business
days of filing shall constitute an incomplete application and the administrative recourse of appeal
shall be denied. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.80.010 Board of appeals membership.
A. There is created a board of appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience
and training to pass on matters pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of
the city of Edmonds. The technical expertise of board members shall be supplied through training
or experience as an architect, builder, general contractor, developer, fire inspector, mechanical
Packet Page 247 of 302
19-64
engineer, electrician, plumber, or structural engineer. The board members shall be active,
practicing members of one of the prior listed disciplines or professions and include one lay person.
Technical members of the board shall be appointed by the mayor and must reside in Snohomish
County; the lay person shall be a resident of the city of Edmonds.
B. The board shall consist of nine voting members and four alternates appointed by the mayor.
The board shall be comprised of persons with the following backgrounds or professional
designations:
1. Position One. Structural engineer registered by the state of Washington with at least
five years’ experience.
2. Position Two. Certified fire protection specialist with at least five years’ experience.
3. Position Three. Mechanical engineer registered by the state of Washington with at
least five years’ experience.
4. Position Four. Architect registered by the state of Washington with at least five
years’ experience.
5. Position Five. Electrician licensed by the state of Washington with at least five
years’ experience.
6. Position Six. Journeyman plumber licensed by the state of Washington with at least
five years’ experience
7. Positions Seven and Eight. General contractor, developer or builder licensed by the
state of Washington with at least five years’ experience.
8. Position Nine. Citizen member of the city of Edmonds who is not associated with
the building industry.
9. Alternates. Four additional alternates will be chosen to be called by the board
during absence or disqualification of a member. Alternate members are required to meet one of the
technical qualifications required for board membership. In the absence of any member of the
board, the alternates shall be authorized to fill such temporary vacancy, regardless of the resulting
composition of the board, with the full power accorded the regular member. The board chairman
shall appoint the alternate. A permanent vacancy shall be filled by an alternate who is appointed by
the mayor. Alternates may appear at all meetings but shall not vote unless they are filling a
temporary vacancy.
C. Building Official Duties.
1. Hearing Secretary. The secretary of the board shall be the building official. The
secretary shall be the custodian of the records, shall conduct official correspondence of the board
and generally be responsible for clerical work of the board. The secretary shall be present at the
appeal meetings and shall present all relevant information regarding appeals to the board, including
the application and other information submitted by the appellant prior to the hearing. The secretary
shall notify all interested parties regarding matters of the board.
2. Building Department Representatives. The building official shall be an ex officio
member of the board without voting power.
Packet Page 248 of 302
19-65
D. Fire Department Representatives. The chief of the fire prevention bureau, or his authorized
representative, shall be an ex officio member to the board without voting power. [Ord. 3502 § 2,
2004].
19.80.015 Board of appeals procedures.
A. Terms. As of the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title, the mayor shall
appoint the initial board members to overlapping terms. Two technical members shall be appointed
to a one-year term, two technical members shall be appointed to two-year terms, two technical
members shall be appointed to three-year terms, and the remaining members shall be appointed to
three-year terms. Following initial terms, subsequent terms of all board members and alternates
shall be for three calendar years. No member of the board shall serve more than three consecutive
full terms, or a total of more than nine consecutive calendar years.
B. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings may be held once each month, or as often as may be
required. At the first regular meeting of each calendar year, the board shall elect a chairman and a
vice chairman. The chairman of the board shall require that all members of the board be polled
during voting at the meeting. Seven members of the board shall constitute a quorum.
C. Special Meetings. Special meetings may be held by the chairman and at such times as the
board shall determine. The board, the city or an appellant may request a special meeting. Any
special meeting held at the request of an appellant shall be paid for by the appellant in the amount
set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. Five members of the board shall constitute a quorum at special
meetings.
D. Executive Sessions. Executive sessions of the board may be called pursuant to the State
Open Public Meetings law by the chairman or the vice chairman of the board and are not open to
the public. The building official shall attend as secretary.
E. Public Notice. Public notice shall be given of all meetings. Upon written receipt and
confirmation of a complete appeal of a request, notice shall be sent to the fire department, the
health department, the city attorney and the owner of the real estate and parties within 100 feet
affected by the request. No hearing shall be scheduled until 15 days after the required hearing
notifications are mailed. Meetings shall be open to the public. The appellant, the appellants’
representative, the building official, and any person whose interests are affected shall be given an
opportunity to be heard.
F. Oath/Subpoena. The chairman may administer oaths, accept affirmations and compel the
attendance of witnesses. A failure or refusal to appear in response to a subpoena issued by the
board shall constitute a violation of these adopted codes and be subject to the penalties as outlined
in Chapter 19.85 ECDC.
G. Department/Interested Party. At any public meeting a representative of the city building
and fire department and any other interested party may appear in person, by agent or by attorney,
offer evidence and testimony and cross-examine witnesses. All evidence and testimony shall be
presented publicly. The board may take judicial notice of facts to the same extent and in the same
manner as courts of record and may consider relevant facts within the personal knowledge of any
member of the board that are stated into the record by such member.
Packet Page 249 of 302
19-66
H. Recording. All meetings before the board shall be recorded.
I. Compensation. The board shall receive no compensation regardless of number or type of
cases heard.
J. Removal. Board members shall be removed from office by the mayor prior to the end of
their terms only for just cause. Any member who is unavailable for three consecutive appeal
hearings shall be automatically removed and an alternate appointed as provided for herein.
K. Conflict of Interest. Members with a material or financial interest in a matter before the
board shall declare such interest and refrain from participating in discussions, deliberations, and
voting on such matters. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.80.020 Powers and duties of the board.
A. The board shall adopt rules and procedures governing all proceedings consistent with the
provisions set forth herein. The rules and regulations shall include meeting location, meeting time,
procedures, contents of a complete appeal application and time to be allotted for each case.
B. Subject to the limitations enumerated herein, the board shall have and may exercise the
following powers:
1. The board shall have no authority relative to the interpretation of the administrative
provisions of any of the state building codes, nor shall the board be empowered to waive any
requirement of any such code.
2. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the board to hear any appeal, nor any
request for deviation of design or alternative methods with respect to any property lying within a
recognized landslide hazard and earth subsidence area or which is otherwise subject to the
requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC including effecting map changes.
3. The board, on review, may approve the use of any material, alternate design or
method of construction providing that it finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies
with the provisions of this code and that the material, design, or method is, for the purpose
intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the applicable code in suitability, strength,
effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety and sanitation. The decision of the building official
shall not be overturned unless the board shall find that the following conditions exist:
a. That the appellant properly applied for an appeal;
b. That sufficient evidence, proof or testing reports were submitted by the
appellant that substantiated claims of equivalency;
c. That the proposed modification or alternate will not weaken the general
purpose of the adopted code;
d. That the proposed modification or alternate will be in harmony with the spirit
and purpose of the adopted code;
e. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the
public health and safety;
Packet Page 250 of 302
19-67
f. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the
structural integrity of the building; and
g. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the fire
safety of the building.
4. To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any notice or order
made by the building official and/or fire marshal in the enforcement of the adopted codes in this
title. The board shall have the power to stay the enforcement of any order issued by the building
and/or fire department unless the building official and/or fire marshal certifies that a stay of the
order or denial would, in the opinion of the building official and/or fire marshal, cause imminent
peril to life or property. A stay shall not constitute board approval, shall be personal to the
appellant and not transferable, and shall be subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the
board. Any determination or order of the building and/or fire department shall be presumed to be
correct until evidence is introduced that would support a contrary determination.
5. Whenever the owner or legally responsible person of an alleged unsafe building,
structure, utility or other condition does not agree with the order from the building official and/or
fire marshal as to the correction to be made, he shall have the right to appeal to the board within 10
days from the date of said order. In his appeal, the appellant shall state how he proposes to make
the unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition safe and the board may require the appellant
to submit detailed engineering analysis or recommendations, accompanied by plans and
specifications prepared by a state licensed architect or registered professional engineer, as
prescribed in this adopted code. The board, in hearing such appeals, may require substantiating
data concerning the removal or other remedial steps to be taken to render the unsafe building,
structure, utility or other condition safe. In any matter in which an order or notice relating to an
unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition is appealed, the building and/or fire department
may certify to the board that the unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition could become
an imminent hazard, in which case the board shall schedule a meeting within five business days to
hear said appeal.
C. Burden of Proof.
1. The appellant bears the burden of proof in any proceeding before the board. If there
is insufficient evidence of compliance with any of the provisions of this code or evidence that any
material or construction does not conform to the requirements of this code, the appeal from the
decision of the building official shall be denied.
2. The board may continue any proceeding in order to permit the appellant to provide
proof of compliance through tests conducted in accordance with general engineering practice and
best scientific evidence. Such tests shall be made by the appellant and at no expense to the
jurisdiction. Test methods shall be as specified by the applicable building code or by other
recognized testing standards. If there are not recognized and accepted test methods for the
proposed alternate, testing methods shall utilize generally accepted engineering practice and best
scientific method. Reports of such tests shall be retained and made a part of record of the
proceedings.
D. Decision of the Board.
1. The board shall render formal written decisions within 10 days date of the hearing.
Every decision of the board shall be based upon findings of fact and every finding of fact shall be
supported in the record of its proceedings. A mere finding or recitation of the enumerated
Packet Page 251 of 302
19-68
conditions unaccompanied by findings of specific facts shall not be deemed findings of fact and
shall not be deemed compliance with the code. The building official shall take immediate action in
accordance with the decision of the board.
2. Copies of the decision shall be forwarded to the appellant, a copy shall be placed in
the appeal file and copies shall be made available to any person as a matter of public information.
Decisions shall be filed with the building or fire department as a matter of public record.
3. In the exercise of the powers described above, the board may reverse or affirm,
wholly or in part, or may modify the order, requirements, decision or determination appealed from
the board, may impose conditions or requirements as deemed necessary and may hold cases in
abeyance until proper information needed by the board is supplied. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.80.025 Appeals from decisions of the board.
A. The filing of a land use petition for review shall not stay proceedings upon the decision
appealed but the court may grant a stay in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act.
B. All decisions of the board are appealable by Land Use Petition Act to Snohomish County
superior court. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
19.80.030 Snohomish County regional board of appeals.
As to such time that a regional board of appeals is established within Snohomish County, the city
reserves the right to replace the local city board of appeals with said regional board once an
interlocal agreement is approved and adopted by council action. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 252 of 302
19-69
Chapter 19.85
PENALTIES
Sections:
19.85.000 Applicability.
19.85.000 Applicability.
The provisions of all adopted codes within ECDC Title 19 shall be subject to penalties as described
herein.
It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or other organization to erect, construct, enlarge,
alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any
building or structure in the city, or cause the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of
the provisions of this chapter. Any person, firm, corporation or other organization violating any of
the provisions of ECDC Title 19 as adopted herein, or other provision of this chapter, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or
portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of ECDC Title 19 herein is
committed, continued or permitted, and upon the conviction thereof of such violation, and each
violation thereof such person, firm, corporation or other organization, and the officers, directors
and managers thereof shall be punishable as set forth in ECC 5.50.020 and Chapter 20.110 ECDC.
Nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the discretion of the city to seek any other available
civil, statutory or common law remedies. [Ord. 3502 § 2, 2004].
Packet Page 253 of 302
19-70
Chapter 19.90
LIMITATION OF BENEFITED AND PROTECTED CLASSES
Sections:
19.90.000 Limitation of benefited and protected classes.
19.90.000 Limitation of benefited and protected classes.
The building and supplemental codes adopted by ECDC Title 19 are for the purpose of providing
for and promoting the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Nothing in this title shall be
interpreted to create or otherwise establish any particular class or group of persons who will or
would be especially protected or benefited by the adoption of any code in this title. [Ord. 3502 § 2,
2004].
Packet Page 254 of 302
19-71
Chapter 19.95
CONVERSION CONDOMINIUMS
Sections:
19.95.010 Definitions.
19.95.020 Relocation assistance.
19.95.030 Violations.
19.95.040 Civil penalty.
19.95.050 Enforcement.
19.95.010 Definitions.
The following words and phrases used in this chapter shall have the meaning set forth in this
section:
A. “Condominium” means real property, portions of which are designated for separate
ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the owners
of those portions. Real property is not a condominium unless the undivided interests in the
common elements are vested in the unit owners, and unless a declaration and a survey map and
plans have been recorded pursuant to this chapter.
B. “Conversion condominium” means a condominium (1) that at any time before creation of
the condominium was lawfully occupied wholly or partially by a tenant or subtenant for residential
purposes pursuant to a rental agreement, oral or written, express or implied, for which the tenant or
subtenant had not received the notice described in subsection (2) of this definition; or (2) that, at
any time within 12 months before the conveyance of, or acceptance of an agreement to convey, any
unit therein other than to a declarant or any affiliate of a declarant, was lawfully occupied wholly or
partially by a residential tenant of a declarant or an affiliate of a declarant and such tenant was not
notified in writing, prior to lawfully occupying a unit or executing a rental agreement, whichever
event first occurs, that the unit was part of a condominium and subject to sale. “Conversion
condominium” shall not include a condominium in which, before the effective date of the
ordinance codified herein, any unit therein had been conveyed or been made subject to an
agreement to convey to any transferee other than a declarant or an affiliate of a declarant.
C. “Declarant” means any person who:
1. Executes as declarant the document, however denominated, that creates a
condominium by setting forth the information required by RCW 64.34.216 and any amendments to
that document; or
2. Reserves any special declarant right in the declaration; or
3. Exercises special declarant rights or to whom special declarant rights are transferred;
or
4. Is the owner of a fee interest in the real property which is subjected to the
declaration at the time of the recording of an instrument pursuant to RCW 64.34.316 and who
directly or through one or more affiliates is materially involved in the construction, marketing, or
sale of units in the condominium created by the recording of the instrument; or
5. Undertakes to convert, sell, or offer for sale units in a conversion condominium.
D. “Director” means the development services director or his designee.
Packet Page 255 of 302
19-72
E. “Notice of conversion” means the 90-day notice pursuant to RCW 64.34.440(1) required to
be given by the declarant or his agent to residential tenants and subtenants in possession of a
portion of a conversion condominium.
F. “Person” means a natural person, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, trust,
association, or other legal entity.
G. “Tenant” or “subtenant” means any person who occupies and has a leasehold interest in a
rental unit under a lawful rental agreement, whether oral or written, express or implied.
H. “Unit” means a physical portion of the condominium designed for separate ownership, the
boundaries of which are described pursuant to RCW 64.34.216(1)(d). [Ord. 3610 § 1, 2006].
19.95.020 Relocation assistance.
A. Declarant shall pay relocation assistance of $500.00 per unit to tenants and subtenants who
elect not to purchase a unit and who are in lawful occupancy for residential purposes of a unit, and
whose monthly household income from all sources, on the date of the notice of conversion, was
less than an amount equal to 80 percent of the monthly median income for comparably sized
households in the Seattle-Everett Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, as defined and established
by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
B. The household size of a unit shall be based on the number of natural persons actually in
lawful occupancy of the unit on the date of the notice of conversion.
C. The tenant or subtenant actually in lawful occupancy of the unit shall be entitled to the
relocation assistance.
D. Relocation assistance shall be paid on or before the date the tenant or subtenant vacates and
shall be in addition to any damage deposit or other compensation or refund to which the tenant is
otherwise entitled. Unpaid rent or other amounts owed by the tenant or subtenant to the landlord
may be offset against the relocation assistance.
E. Rights of tenants and subtenants set forth in the notice of conversion pursuant to RCW
64.34.440(1) must set forth tenants’ and subtenants’ right to relocation assistance as provided in
this section. [Ord. 3610 § 1, 2006].
19.95.030 Violations.
It shall be a violation of this chapter for a declarant to fail or refuse to comply with the provisions
of this chapter. Each tenant and subtenant who is subjected to a violation of the provisions of this
chapter shall constitute a separate violation. Each day of violation shall constitute a separate
violation. [Ord. 3610 § 1, 2006].
19.95.040 Civil penalty.
Any person who fails or refuses to comply with the provisions or requirements of this chapter shall
be subject to a civil penalty in the amount of $100.00 per violation per day from the date that the
violation is first committed until the declarant complies with the requirements of this chapter.
[Ord. 3610 § 1, 2006].
Packet Page 256 of 302
19-73
19.95.050 Enforcement.
A. Tenants and subtenants subjected to violations of the provisions of this chapter, or their
agents, may file a complaint with the director. The director is authorized and directed to receive
complaints and conduct such investigations as are deemed necessary such as contacting declarants
and seeking explanation for apparent violations.
B. Whenever it is determined that there has been a violation of this chapter, the director is
authorized to pursue, at the director’s discretion, enforcement of the code pursuant to provisions
Chapter 20.110 ECDC. [Ord. 3610 § 1, 2006].
Packet Page 257 of 302
AM-1008 7.
Developer Agreement - Old Milltown
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:45 Minutes
Department:Development Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public Hearing - Consideration of a Development Agreement under RCW 36.70B.170 to
provide vesting to certain real property located at 201 5th Avenue South, Edmonds,
Washington (Old Milltown). The agreement covers lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 37, 38, 39 and 40,
including both Old Milltown and the adjacent site.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
This development agreement is associated with the proposed settlement agreement. If the City
Council, after taking public testimony, is inclined to approve the agreement then the Mayor should
be authorized to sign the development agreement.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Gregg Productions Associates, Inc. (Developer) has proposed a development agreement covering
the entire properties commonly known as Old Milltown located at 201 Fifth Avenue North in
downtown Edmonds.
The Developer seeks to enter into a development agreement that is authorized under State Law to
vest the development of the property under the City's design review, zoning and building
regulations that existed as of April 15, 2007. The agreement would run until the end of the
business day on January 15, 2008. The agreement does not preclude the City imposing new or
different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety. "Old
Milltown" is already vested, so practical impact is only to vest the adjacent site.
It should be noted that the Heritage Center discussion, the development of new design criteria by
the ADB and HPC, and new procedures to include HPC members on the ADB for designs in the
Heritage Center and the revision of the nonconforming use chapter to include "adaptive reuse"
techniques need to be integrated and will take conservatively 6 or 7 months.
The Growth Management Act authorizes development agreements to "...govern and vest the
development, use, and mitigation of the development of real property for the duration specified in
the agreement. A development agreement shall be consistent with the applicable development
regulations adopted by a local government..." RCW 36.70B.170. The duration of the proposed
agreement is through the close of business on January 15, 2008. The developer would be required
to comply with all codes of the city in effect as of April 15, 2007. The agreement grants no
Packet Page 258 of 302
deviation from any development regulation of the city and is therefore consistent with your
development regulations. Among the things which a development agreement can accomplish is the
establishment of a "build out or vesting period for applicable standards." RCW 36.70B.170(3)(i).
The agreement also reserves the right of the city to enact new development regulations that would
control development "to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety" as
required by RCW 36.70B.170(4).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Development Agreement for Old Milltown
Link: Exhibit 2 - Email from City Attorney to B. Larmen
Link: Exhibit 3 - Correspondence - Stovel
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 03:15 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/29/2007 03:19 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/29/2007 03:23 PM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 05/29/2007 09:22
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/29/2007
Packet Page 259 of 302
ATTACHMENT A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this ____ day of __________, 2007, between the CITY OF
EDMONDS, a municipal corporation (“City”), and GREGG PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES,
INC., a Washington corporation (“GPA”).
WHEREAS, GPA is the owner of the property at 201 Fifth Avenue South, Edmonds, WA
98020 that is more particularly described as follows (hereafter referred to as the “Old Milltown
Property”);
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 37,38, 39, and 40, Block 121, The City of
Edmonds, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of
Plats, Pages 39 and 40, Records of Snohomish County, Washington;
EXCEPT the East 16 feet of said Lot 37;
TOGETHER WITH That Portion of the vacated alley adjoining
Lots 1 through 4 and Lots 37 through 40, inclusive,
EXCEPT That Portion of the South half of said vacated alley lying
adjacent to the East 16 feet of Lot 37.
SITUATE in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington.
WHEREAS, GPA intends to develop and refurbish the Old Milltown Property in
accordance with the current zoning, land use and other applicable City regulations;
WHEREAS, the City is responsible for the review and processing of all applications for
City entitlements that might be required for the development and refurbishment of the Old
Milltown Property; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted a public hearing and voted on ______________ to
approve this Agreement;
SEA 1991049v1 0083180-000001
Packet Page 260 of 302
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority granted by RCW 36.70B.170 and for
good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged, the City and GPA
enter into the following agreement:
1. The parties agree that until the end of the business day on January 15, 2008
(hereafter the “Term”), applications submitted for the development or refurbishment of the Old
Milltown Property shall be governed by the zoning, design review, and other applicable City
development standards as they existed on April 15, 2007.
2. Any and all City permits issued for the Old Milltown Property as a result of
applications submitted to the City during the Term of this Agreement shall be considered vested
under Washington law against the City development standards as they existed on April 15, 2007.
3. The City reserves the authority, pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170(4), to “impose new
or different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety.”
4. This Agreement shall be recorded in the records of Snohomish County, shall
attach to and run with the Old Milltown Property, and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors
and assigns of the parties.
DATED this ____ day of ____________, 2007.
CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation
By
_______________________
GREGG PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC.,
a Washington corporation
SEA 1991049v1 0083180-000001
Packet Page 261 of 302
By
Robert R. Gregg, President
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this _____ day of __________, 2007, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, personally appeared _____________________, known to me (or proved to me
on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument, and on oath
stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledge it as the
_________________ of CITY OF EDMONDS to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
municipal corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year
first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My appointment expires
Print Name
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this _____ day of ___________, 2007, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, personally appeared ROBERT R. GREGG, known to me (or proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument, and on oath stated
that he was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledge it as the President of GREGG
PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC., to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year
first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My appointment expires
Print Name
SEA 1991049v1 0083180-000001
Packet Page 262 of 302
Chase, Sandy
From: W. Scott Snyder [ssnyder@omwlaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:33 PM
To: Chase, Sandy
Subject: FW: For Packet
6/1/2007
The email below is from the City Attorney to Elizabeth Larman, a party of record in the
Gregg Land use Petition Action, and reviews basic information regarding state and city
vesting requirements. It is included for public information.
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
From: W. Scott Snyder
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:30 PM
To: 'bhlarman@earthlink.net'
Cc: Duane Bowman; Mayor Haakenson
Subject: RE: Questions
Let's see if I can walk you through a fairly complicated process. Let's start with the
difference between how a project vests and what (the regulations) to which it vests.
Simply put, vesting refers to the process under which you determine what rules or
regulations apply to a particular project.
Vesting--how does a particular project vest?
Lot size--the lots in a subdivision vest to the dimensional requirements and bulk (side
yard, front yard and other dimensional requirements) standards in effect when the
subdivision application is filed.
RCW 58.17.033
Building code and requirements relating to a particular structure. Generally these
requirements vest or are fixed at the date that a fully completed building permit and fee
are submitted. RCW 19.27.031, .074 and 095 ; and ECDC 19.00.015.
Concurrent review-vesting for projects that are reviewed under multiple processes.
Projects that will go through multiple approval processes, such as a Planned Residential
Development, can vest all of its process reviews (subdivision, PRD, ADB and building code)
at one time by filing a building permit application along with applications for the other
processes. ECDC 19.00.020. This allows a developer to avoid the problems that could
arise when he or she goes through multiple design review processes and the building code
changes in a way that would other wise prevent the developer from building the specific
house whose design was approved by the ADB. This could occur due to changes in building
code requirements for energy and design,which reduce for example the number of
allowable windows.
Packet Page 263 of 302
Alternative vesting for ADB projects. ECDC 19.00.025 permits a developer to vest his
project with an enhanced ADB application. This alternative was added to the code in
2004 in recognition of the hardship that a developer could incur if, again, the building
code changed while the ADB application was in process. This is similar to vesting under
ECDC 19.00.020 but applies when there is only the ADB application and then an actual
building permit to process.
Development Agreements. Finally, rights can be vested under a development agreement
pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170-200. The provisions of this chapter (36.70B) are
mandatory for all jurisdictions that plan under the Growth Management act--its
provisions don't need to be adopted by a particular jurisdiction to be applicable. This
vesting process is more akin to a contract than a land use approval--the council sits as a
legislative body when deciding whether to contract. The agreement must however
conform to the city's development regulations and can be appealed und the Land Use
Petition Act if it is tied to a development approval. As we have discussed, in the context
of the Gregg request, there are no requested changes in current development
regulations--just establishment of a vesting window.
What is Vested
When a fully completed building permit or other development application is filed, the
applicant vests to all of the provisions of the zoning code in effect at the time. The
applicant is vested for the life of the permit. In the case of a development agreement,
vesting fixes rights to the zoning code as of a certain date, but only for the period set
forth in the agreement. The date that you mention n your email is the date (April 15th)
that the initial proposal was made and therefore picks up the new ADB process as well.
These are the same development regulations that would apply if an ADB/building permit
application were filed today.
The most common use of development agreements in most jurisdictions is for phased
developments where a developer constructs multiple phases of an integrated development
and wants to go through one process (or at least the same process and development
standards) for all phases of a multiphase development project. Edmonds does not have
many construction sites large enough for phased development. One example that is
coming up will be the request of Community Transit to vest to one design process through
a development agreement so that it can use a uniform design and signage for all of its new
"Swift BRT" buses along Highway 99.
I hope this helps answer your questions. I am forwarding a copy of this email to the
council so that it can be included in the packet. Your questions were good ones. Because
some of your comments regarding Mr. Gregg are of a personal nature, I won't forward
your inquiry--you can make those comments to the council yourself, should you choose to
6/1/2007
Packet Page 264 of 302
do so.
Scott
W. Scott Snyder
Attorney at Law
OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, PLLC
1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 447-7000
ssnyder@omwlaw.com
http:www.omwlaw.com
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution or copying of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you think that you received this message in error, please
delete the message and e-mail the sender at "ssnyder@omwlaw.com".
6/1/2007
Packet Page 265 of 302
Packet Page 266 of 302
Packet Page 267 of 302
Packet Page 268 of 302
Packet Page 269 of 302
AM-1017 8.
Settlement Agreement - Gregg Productions v. Edmonds
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Submitted For:City Attorney Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of Settlement Agreement - Gregg Productions, Inc. v. City of Edmonds; contingent
on approval of Agenda Item 7.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Contingent on approval of the Development Agreement under consideration (refer to Agenda Item
7).
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
If the Council approves the Development Agreement shown as Agenda Item 7, it will proceed with
consideration of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement would resolve the Land
Use Petition Act appeal of the original Old Milltown application and two damage claim actions
initiated by the plaintiff property owner.
A copy of the proposed Settlement Agreement is attached.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Settlement Agreement
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/01/2007 09:03 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/01/2007 09:12 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/01/2007 09:15 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/01/2007 08:57
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/01/2007
Packet Page 270 of 302
SEA 2022541v1 0083160-000001
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
The CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington municipal corporation (“City”), and GREGG
PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC., a Washington corporation (“GPA”), in full resolution of
the pending litigation between the parties, agree as follows:
1. Development Agreement; Vesting. Upon approval by the City Council after a
public hearing conducted in accordance with RCW 36.70B.170, GPA and the City will enter into
a Development Agreement in the form attached and incorporated by reference as Attachment A
to this Settlement Agreement. The Development Agreement shall provide vesting for GPA in
the development of the “Old Milltown Property” (as defined in Attachment A) until January 15,
2008. In the event the City Council does not approve of the Development Agreement in the form
attached to this Settlement Agreement as Attachment A, this Settlement Agreement shall be null
and void.
2. Damages. The City will pay GPA damages in the amount of Thirty Thousand
Dollars and no/100ths ($30,000.00). Such payment will be made to GPA in the following
manner: (a) Fifteen Thousand Dollars and no/100ths ($15,000.00) in the form of a cashier’s
check or equivalent, to be delivered promptly following the City Council’s approval of the
Development Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 above; and
(b) Fifteen Thousand Dollars and no/100ths ($15,000.00) in the form of a credit to GPA against
past or future sidewalk and right-of-way access mitigation payments incurred with respect to
development of the Old Milltown Property.
3. Good-Faith Review. The City agrees to engage in good-faith and timely review
of all currently issued, pending, or future applications for building permits, land use decisions or
any other entitlements related to the Old Milltown Property.
4. Waiver of Claims and Dismissal of Suits. GPA and the City will release and
waive all pending claims against each other that have or could have been made relating to the
subject matter of the three actions identified below and, upon City Council approval and the
parties’ execution of the Development Agreement (identified in ¶ 1 above) and payment by the
City of GPA’s damages (identified in ¶ 2 above), GPA will dismiss, with prejudice, the
Packet Page 271 of 302
SEA 2022541v1 0083160-000001
following actions against the City: Gregg Production Associates, Inc. v. City of Edmonds, et al.,
Snohomish County Superior Court No. 07-2-02086-0 (LUPA case); and Gregg Production
Associates, Inc. v. City of Edmonds, Snohomish County Superior Court No. 07-2-02092-4
(damages case); and Gregg Production Associates, Inc. v. City of Edmonds, Snohomish County
Superior Court No. 07-2-03677-4 (damages case).
5. Successors and Assigns. This Settlement Agreement shall be binding on the
parties, their successors and assigns.
EXECUTED on the dates indicated for each signature below:
CITY OF EDMONDS
By
Its
Approved as to Form:
By
W. Scott Snyder
City Attorney
GREGG PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES, INC.
By
Robert R. Gregg
Its President
Packet Page 272 of 302
AM-1011 10.
164th Street SW Walkway/74th Place West Drainage Improvements
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/05/2007
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:20 Minutes
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report of bids opened on May 8, 2007 for the 164th Street SW Walkway and the 74th Place
West Drainage Improvements projects and award of contract to Trimaxx Construction, Inc.
($545,565.00).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council appropriate an additional $225,500 in Fund 125 (REET 2 Transportation) and an additional
$88,000 in Fund 412-200 (Drainage Projects), and award a contract to Trimaxx Construction, Inc.
in the amount of $545,565.00 for the 164th Street SW Walkway and the 74th Place West Drainage
Improvements projects.
Previous Council Action
On March 6, 2007, Council authorized Staff to call for bids for the 164th Street SW Walkway and
the 74th Place West Drainage Improvements projects.
Narrative
On May 8, 2007, the City received three bids for this contract. The bid tabulation summary is
provided as Attachment 1. The bids ranged from a low of $545,565.00 to a high of $644,735.30.
The engineer’s estimate was $318,878. The low bid was submitted by Trimaxx Construction, Inc.
The invitation for bids for this contract included two separate bid schedules for the projects as
follows:
Schedule A – 164 th Street SW Walkway
Schedule B – 74th Place West Drainage Improvements
These two project will be addressed separately below.
Schedule A - 164th Street SW Walkway:
This project has become much more expensive than initially anticipated. A decision must be made
whether to proceed with construction of this project and award the contract or pursue another
option. The low bidder’s bid for Schedule A, 164th Street SW Walkway, is $412,686, whereas the
engineer’s estimate for this schedule was $255,135. The adopted 2007 capital budget and
Packet Page 273 of 302
2007-2013 CIP include $270,000 for construction of this project in Fund 125, Parks Improvement.
The low bid of $412,686 is very expensive for the approximately 300 linear feet of sidewalk
included in the project. Why is it so expensive? Two main reasons:
1. Current construction industry bidding climate
2. Project scope
Current Construction Industry Bidding Climate. The construction industry is experiencing rapidly
escalating bids. Recently, bids have been coming in significantly higher than engineer's estimates
throughout the industry, especially on public projects. Attachment 2 is a recent article discussing
this market condition. Although we reviewed and updated our engineer's estimate for this project
before advertising for bids, it appears that we did not fully account for this.
Project Scope. The site for this project has very challenging topography. 164th Street SW is a
steep, narrow, curving road, with steep slopes on both sides. There is presently no room to just
install a sidewalk that would meet current safety standards. Please see the photographs provided as
Attachment 3.
To provide room to construct a sidewalk requires significant excavation and reconstruction to
widen the roadway, relocation of a watermain, and construction of a retaining wall. Construction
of sidewalks requires compliance with current Federal standards for ADA curb ramps, which
requires additional reconstruction at the intersection of 164th Street SW and North Meadowdale
Road, where the current configuration is a very sharp and steep turn.
In essence, to install a sidewalk on this section of 164th Street SW requires a significant road
reconstruction project. Please see the drawing provided as Attachment 4.
In addition, 164th Street SW is the only public road providing access to this neighborhood of
approximately 150 homes, so traffic flow must be maintained during construction. This results in
significant traffic control cost. This project site is a tight and very difficult site to work due to the
topography, limited staging area for equipment and materials, difficult access for trucks and
equipment, and the need to keep traffic flowing.
The engineer’s estimate of $255,135 considered all of these scope and cost elements, but we
obviously did not accurately account for the market conditions and degree of difficulty anticipated
by the bidders. To help put this into perspective, the following are a few examples of cost elements
comparing the low bid amount to the engineer’s estimate:
Bid Item Engineer’s Estimate Low Bid
Roadway excavation and haul $12,727 $52,866
Ductile iron pipe for water main $12,650 $21,450
Concrete gravity block retaining wall $39,000 $63,700
Traffic control $20,000 $38,000
So, what options do we have?
We have reviewed the project design in-house, as well as with the low bidder and the engineering
Packet Page 274 of 302
consultant that designed the project to try to find adjustments to the scope or design to reduce the
cost by change order. We have not been able to identify any significant cost reductions within the
current design.
During the design development in 2002-2003, the option of constructing the sidewalk on the other
side of the road was considered. In deciding to construct the sidewalk on the uphill side of the
road, our alternatives analysis included such factors as geotechnical evaluation of soils stability of
the slopes, degree of difficulty in connecting/transitioning the sidewalk and road to the sidewalk
and road at North Meadowdale Road (where the existing condition is a very steep, sharp turn),
retaining wall options in cut vs. fill construction, pedestrian safety, and associated cost factors. In
light of the bids received, it is certainly an option to reevaluate other design alternatives previously
rejected. However, any significant redesign would require deferring the construction a year (due to
the steep slopes and the need to perform construction in this location during dry summer months)
and rebidding the project, and would involve additional design costs, with no assurance at this point
of a less expensive project.
We have considered simply installing a strip of asphalt walkway without all the roadway
reconstruction and have concluded that a safe walkway meeting current standards cannot be
provided in this manner. In addition, the condition of the existing road is very deteriorated, and
construction of such a walkway would likely worsen this condition. If we are going to construct a
sidewalk in this location, we should do it right, and not “jury-rig” it.
We have also considered deferring the project and advertising for bids again next year, but have no
basis for expecting a better bidding climate next year.
So, after careful review of this situation by Development Services, Public Works, and Parks and
Recreation, we really see only three practical options:
1. Appropriate additional funds and award the contract
2. Cancel the project for this year, review redesign alternatives, redesign as
appropriate, and advertise for bids again next year.
3. Cancel the project.
To award a contract to the low bidder for Schedule A, 164th Street SW Walkway, would require
approximately $495,500 as follows:
Contract Award $412,686
Contingency (15%) 61,900
Surveying 1,300
Construction Engineering 10,000
Material Testing 5,000
Advertising 500
1% Public Art 4,130
Total $495,516
The adopted budget for this project is $270,000 in Fund 125 (Parks Improvements). So, to award
the contract for this project requires an additional $225,500.
Where can the money come from? As noted above, the condition of the road in this location is
seriously deteriorated and needs to be repaved soon, whether or not a sidewalk is constructed.
Packet Page 275 of 302
seriously deteriorated and needs to be repaved soon, whether or not a sidewalk is constructed.
Please see the photos provided as Attachment 5. The adopted 2007-2008 capital budget includes
$550,000 in 2008 in Fund 125 (REET2 Transportation Projects) for citywide overlays. If Council
decides to proceed with the 164th Street SW Walkway project, the Development Services, Public
Works, and Parks and Recreation Directors recommend that $225,500 of this $550,000 be moved
forward from 2008 to 2007 and used to fund the 164th Street SW Walkway project instead of
citywide street overlays.
So, again, the options are:
1. Appropriate additional funds and award the contract
2. Cancel the project for this year, review redesign alternatives, redesign as
appropriate, and advertise for bids again next year.
3. Cancel the project.
This is a high priority walkway project. During the public hearing process for the 6-year CIP earlier
this year, a number of residents in the neighborhood signed a petition and spoke to the Council
strongly supporting the need to construct this walkway project.
Staff recommends Option 1.
74th Place West Drainage Improvements:
Subsequent to preparation of the 2007-2008 capital budget, the Public Works Department
identified an emergent drainage problem on 74th Place West at Meadowdale Beach Road. The
location of this project is near the 164th Street SW Walkway project and the nature of construction
is similar. Staff determined that it made sense to include this project in the same construction
contract as the 164th Street SW Walkway project. Thus, the 74th Place West Drainage
Improvements project was included as Schedule B in the invitation for bids.
The low bidder's bid for Schedule B is $132,879. The estimated funds required to award the
contract for Schedule B is about $158,000 as follows:
Contract Award $132,879
Contingency (15%) 19,930
Construction Engineering 2,500
Material Testing 2,500
Advertising N/A
1% Public Art N/A
Total $157,809
Funding for the 74th Place West Drainage Improvements project is not included as a specific
project in the 2007-2008 adopted capital budget, since this project is an emergent requirement
identified by Public Works after preparation of the budget. $70,000 is included in the 2007 capital
budget for general Meadowdale drainage projects. An additional $88,000 is required to award
Schedule B for the 74th Place West Drainage Improvements project. There is sufficient cash
balance in Fund 412 for utilities capital projects. Staff recommends Council appropriate the
Packet Page 276 of 302
additional $88,000 for this project.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Bid Tabulation
Link: Bid Blues Article
Link: 164th Project Site Topography
Link: 164th Project Plan
Link: 164th Deterioration
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Dave Gebert 05/30/2007 11:49 AM APRV
2 Development Services Duane Bowman 05/30/2007 11:56 AM APRV
3 Public Works Noel Miller 05/30/2007 02:48 PM APRV
4 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 05/30/2007 02:54 PM APRV
5 Admin Services Dan Clements 05/30/2007 03:29 PM APRV
6 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/30/2007 04:12 PM APRV
7 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/30/2007 07:44 PM APRV
8 Final Approval Linda Hynd 05/31/2007 03:39 PM APRV
Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 05/29/2007 04:02
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/31/2007
Packet Page 277 of 302
Bid Tabulation
City of Edmonds
164th Street SW Walkway (E1DB/i001) and 74th Place W. Drainage Improvements (E7FE/c271)
Bids Opened May 8, 2007
Schedule
Engineer's
Estimate Trimaxx Wilder Dennis Craig
A - 164th Street SW Walkway $255,135.00 $412,686.00 $437,089.00 $404,801.90
B - 74th Place West Drainage
Improvements $63,743.00 $132,879.00 $117,248.00 $239,933.40
Total $318,878.00 $545,565.00 $554,337.00 $644,735.30
Packet Page 278 of 302
Packet Page 279 of 302
Packet Page 280 of 302
Packet Page 281 of 302
Packet Page 282 of 302
Packet Page 283 of 302
Packet Page 284 of 302
Packet Page 285 of 302
Packet Page 286 of 302
Packet Page 287 of 302
Packet Page 288 of 302
Packet Page 289 of 302
Packet Page 290 of 302
Packet Page 291 of 302
Packet Page 292 of 302
Packet Page 293 of 302
Packet Page 294 of 302
Packet Page 295 of 302
Packet Page 296 of 302
Packet Page 297 of 302
Packet Page 298 of 302
Packet Page 299 of 302
Packet Page 300 of 302
Packet Page 301 of 302
Packet Page 302 of 302