Loading...
2007.06.19 CC Agenda PacketAGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North JUNE 19, 2007 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute 1. Approval of Agenda 2• Consent Agenda Items A. Roll Call B. AM-1044 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 5, 2007. C. AM-1057 Approval of claim checks #96752 through #96911 for June 7, 2007 in the amount of $342,282.42, and #96912 through #97087 for June 14, 2007 in the amount of $607,134.06. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44897 through #44971 for the period of May 16 through May 31, 2007 in the amount of $814,306.98. D. AM-1029 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from James R. Lorent (amount undetermined), and Melissa Beard ($440.81). E. AM-1020 Report on final construction costs for the Civic Center Skateboard Park project and Council acceptance of project. F. AM-1021 Report on final construction costs for the 242nd Street SW Storm Improvements (Phase II) project and Council acceptance of project. G. AM-1025 Report on final construction costs for the 2006 Street Overlay Program and Council acceptance of project. H. AM-1043 Report of bids opened on May 22, 2007 for the 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization project and award of contract to Road Construction Northwest, Inc. ($899,631) I. AM-1041 Substitute House Bill 1756 - Fire Department Annual Compliance Report. J. AM-1058 Authorization to Establish Part -Time Domestic Violence Coordinator Position K. AM-1056 Domestic Violence Coordinator Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mill Creek. L. AM-1059 Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force, FY 2007-2008. M. AM-1045 Approval of Purchasing Agreement for Office Supplies and Equipment with Office Max "America Saves" Program. N. AM-1038 Back -Up Server Acquisition of $38,000. O. AM-1053 Surplus Assets. Packet Page 1 of 463 P. AM-1034 Purchase (1) one new street sweeper using Washington State Purchasing Contract #07906 for the Public Works Storm Water Division. Q. AM-1052 Interfund Loan Ordinance R. AM-1054 Proposed Ordinance rezoning certain real property from Single -Family Residential (RS-6) to Office -Residential (OR) for certain properties located on the west side of Sunset Avenue North, and south of Bell Street. S. AM-1055 Proposed Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code, Title 19, to adopt the 2006 International Building Code, 2006 International Residential Code, 2006 International Fire Code, 2006 International Mechanical Code, 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code, 2006 Energy Code, the 2006 State Ventilation and Indoor Quality Code, and other State Codes adopted pursuant to the State Building Code, along with certain amendments to existing City Codes in said Title in order to correct scrivener's errors, grammatical changes, cross reference changes and providing wording clarifications. T. AM-1047 Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds Community Development Code Section 16.30.040 by the repeal of Subsection (B). U. AM-1050 Reappointment of Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Member. 3. AM-1051 Appointment of Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Member to fill vacancy. (5 Min) 4. AM-1042 Edmonds Arts Commission Annual Report for 2006, and presentation of 2007 scholarship recipient. (20 Min) 5. AM-1049 Tobacco Free Parks Presentation. (10 Min) 6. AM-1035 Public Hearing regarding a proposed increase in parking infraction fees. (30 Min) 7. AM-1036 Presentation on Draft City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan. (20 Min) 8• Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 9. AM-1039 Broadband Business Case Contract Award. (15 Min) 10. AM-1040 Fiber Optic Equipment Appropriation. (15 Min) 11. AM-1048 Report on City Council Committee Meetings. (15 Min) 12. (5 Min) Mayor's Comments 13. (15 Min) Council Comments 14. Adjourn Packet Page 2 of 463 AM-1044 2.B. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 5, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft June 5, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes. Link: Draft Minutes Fiscal Impact A ffarhmanfe Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 01:40 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 02:53 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:18 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Started On: 06/13/2007 01:37 Chase PM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 3 of 463 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES June 5, 2007 Following a Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding a legal matter, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Michael Plunkett, Councilmember (arrived 7:21 p.m.) Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Shaun Callahan, Student Representative 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief John Westfall, Fire Marshal Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Rich Lindsay, Parks Maintenance Manager Dave Gebert, City Engineer Jeannine Graf, Building Official Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Plunkett was not present for the vote.) 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Plunkett was not present for the vote.) The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 22, 2007. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #96460 THROUGH #96614 FOR MAY 24, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $440,499.08 AND #96615 THROUGH #96751 FOR MAY 31, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $234,953.60. D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM CLIFF SANDERLIN (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND PHILIP LAUE (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED). Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 1 Packet Page 4 of 463 E. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH SELECTION OF A CONSULTANT TO DESIGN THE SHELL VALLEY EMERGENCY ACCESS AND PRELIMINARY SHORT SUBDIVISION. F. DRAFT GUIDELINES - CANDIDATE FORUMS AND USE OF CITY FACILITIES. G. ORDINANCE NO. 3647 — VACATING CERTAIN UNOPENED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 8TH AVENUE NORTH, NORTH OF SPRAGUE STREET, AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT. H. ORDINANCE NO. 3648 — AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE, SECTION 4.50.040 FEES - DISBURSEMENTS, PARAGRAPH (D), RELATING TO THE REGISTRATION OF LICENSED MASSAGE THERAPISTS. 3. 2006 ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE EDMONDS SISTER CITY COMMISSION. Shiva Riddell, Edmonds Sister City Commission Chair, explained each year the twelve member Commission strives to fulfill the Commission's mission, "to promote international communication and understanding through exchanges of people, ideas, and culture" by providing activities and exchanges that foster understanding and friendship between Edmonds and its Sister City, Hekinan, Japan. She relayed the Commission's sincere thanks to the many individuals, families, businesses, schools and organizations that have provided time and resources to help make these programs successful. She introduced the Executive members of the Board, Felix de Mello, Vice Chair; Jeanne Mazzoni, Secretary; and Rita Bailey Ikeda, Treasurer. She introduced Commissioners Bryan Bechler, Jim Corbett, Lawrence Cretin, Holly Guentz, Grant Linden, Iyoko Okano, Vera Papgeorgiou, and Karen Towey. She noted 2006 saw the departure of Commissioners Consuelo Kinahan and Karen Towey and the addition of Commissioners Grant Linden and Holly Guentz. She extended the Commission's thanks to Brian McIntosh, Director of Parks and Recreation, for his support and guidance. Ms. Riddell described community outreach including a visit by the Commission to the Shinto Shrine in eastern Snohomish County, an information booth at the Edmonds Summer Market, presentation to the Senior Kiwanis Meeting, artist John Vanderbrooke working with wax medium with the visiting Japanese students, and a major Japanese calligraphy exhibit at the Seattle Center by Meito Shodokai attended by several Commissioners. Ms. Riddell reported on the Student Delegation to Hekinan in July where fifteen 4-17 year old students and their chaperones traveled for 15 days and stayed with host families. She reported on the Student Delegation from Hekinan where the Commission arranged home stays for 15 students and two chaperones from Hekinan for two weeks in early August and described activities they enjoyed. She reported on a 12 member adult delegation from Hekinan who visited Edmonds in October and described activities during the delegates stay. Ms. Riddell recognized Commissioner Jim Corbett for preparing the quarterly Sister City newsletter. Next, she described the Hekinan/Edmonds Cooperative Student Art Project. The theme was an "east meets west" and collages were created using small items and objects representing the northwest and the Hekinan region. Ms. Riddell explained Mariko Watts and Michael Hopkins were interviewed and selected from a pool of 14 applicants to work as assistant English teachers in junior high schools in Hekinan for a period of two years. Further, she relayed 2008 will mark the 20th Anniversary of the Edmonds-Hekinan Sister City relationship. The Commission is planning an adult delegation to Japan in April 2008. Ms. Riddell extended the Commission's appreciation to Mayor Haakenson, the City Council, the Edmonds Arts Commission and all City Departments for the continued support of the Commission's cultural programs and activities. Councilmember Marin extended the Council's appreciation to the Sister City Commission. 4. PRESENTATION REGARDING PROPOSED 76TH AVENUE WEST/75TH PLACE WEST WALKWAY AND 162ND STREET SW PARK. Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene introduced the City's new Transportation Engineer, Bertrand Hauss. Mr. Fiene then provided background on the project, explaining it was the highest priority walkway in the current Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 5 of 463 Walkway Comprehensive Plan that has not yet been constructed. The 162nd Street Park was identified as a mini - park in the current Park Comprehensive Plan. The 2007-2008 capital budget allocated $945,000 for 76th Avenue West/751h Place West walkway and $325,000 for the 162nd Street Park. Mr. Fiene explained the City contracted with Gray & Osborne and their sub -consultant for the 162nd Street Park, SBA Associates, in September 2005; the first phase of the contract was preliminary design and determining a preferred alternative. A public meeting was held in April 2007 to solicit public feedback which will be incorporated into the final design. Tani Stafford, Gray & Osborne, displayed a site map identifying the project on 76th Avenue West from Meadowdale Beach Road to 75th Place West to Meadowdale County Park. She described limited space between the existing pavement and the east side of the right-of-way north of 162nd which limited the location of the walkway to the west side. Because a significant portion of the project was within a landslide prone area, HWA Geosciences was hired to investigate the best techniques for widening a roadway in an area prone to landslide. Their recommendation was to build the walkway on the east side if at all possible as cutting into the embankment and removing existing soil made the slope more stable. Because much of the walkway was limited to the west side, they recommended a pile supported structure on the west. Ms. Stafford displayed and reviewed Concept 1, identifying sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot asphalt walkway; a pile -supported boardwalk at 162nd; and the 5-foot asphalt walkway with a soldier pile wall. She advised the walkway would be on the east side on the south end of the project adjoining the existing sidewalk on the east side and shift to the west side at 162nd. She displayed renderings of the existing conditions and proposed improvements for each section. Ms. Stafford displayed and reviewed Concept 2, explaining the primary difference was the entire walkway was on the west side in Concept 2. She identified areas of asphalt walkway and pile supported walkway. She pointed out the section of the road where there was insufficient right-of-way on the west side for a walkway which would require shifting the road slightly to the east, requiring a soldier pile wall which made Concept 2 more expensive than Concept 1. Because cost estimates for both concepts were over the City's budget, they considered phasing the project. Ms. Stafford stated they recommended Concept 1, Phase 1, which would end north of the 162nd park. She reviewed pros and cons for both concepts: Concept 1 Pros: Improves slope stability in landslide zone; improves sight distance at horizontal curve at south end of project; better connection to existing walkway at south end; less expensive to construct. Cons: More right-of-way acquisition required; more crosswalks needed at 162nd. Concept 2 Pros: Less right-of-way acquisition required; fewer crosswalks needed at 162nd. Cons: More expensive to construct; more driveway crossings; not a desirable connection to existing walkway at south end. Susan Black, SBA Associates, described site conditions of the 162nd Street Park including the approximate half acre size, west orientation, 4:1 slope, Puget Sound and regional mountain/island views, and location midway on the walkway project. She described views from the site, opportunities for passive recreation, active play, and trail linkages. She highlighted steep slopes on the east and west and more usable space in the center. She displayed the proposed site plan and described play opportunities such as an interpretive overlook, ship galleon slide, hillside slide/climb, and play structure. She described opportunities for interpretive signs of the Olympic Mountains, regional island views and ship stack identification system. She commented on the opportunity for a sailboat fleet structure, swings, walking path, and open lawn. She summarized site amenities could include picnic areas, open lawn for unstructured play, picnic and BBQ areas, restroom, benches, and drinking fountains. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 6 of 463 Mr. Fiene relayed staff s recommendation of Concept 1 for the walkway and concurrence with the 162ad Street Park concept. He pointed out the walkway on the east provided better slope stability and cost $292,000 less than Concept 2. Staff recommends proceeding with design for Concept 1 walkway for the Meadowdale Beach Road to 162nd section (cost estimate $671,000) and along the frontage of 162nd Street Park (cost estimate $237,000). Staff recommends a separate schedule for the 162nd Street Park to North Meadowdale Beach Road section as it was likely too expensive and provided less benefit (cost estimate $523,000), and recommends not designing the North Meadowdale Road to County Park section as the $514,000 cost estimate was well beyond the budget and provides limited benefit. Staff recommends designing low cost safety improvements for the North Meadowdale Road to County Park section. Councilmember Moore inquired about the feedback from the public meeting and how it was incorporated into the design. Mr. Fiene answered there were comments about amenities at the park; attendees liked the walkway concept and alerted staff to another safety issue near 158`h Street that staff plans to investigate in final design. Councilmember Moore asked if at the time the meeting was held the public was informed both projects may not be possible. Mr. Fiene answered yes. Councilmember Marin expressed support for the design, particularly the elevated walkway and the sailboat fleet in the park. He noted his original understanding was there would be an asphalt walkway; he preferred the proposed design, finding it would enhance the area and mimic the beauty of the downtown waterfront. Responding to Councilmember Moore, Mr. Feine advised the Council would have an opportunity to approve the bid at a later date. Councilmember Moore asked when the engineer's estimate would be available. Mr. Fiene advised there were engineer's estimates for the concept stage; estimates would improve as design progressed. Councilmember Moore was concerned the project could become prohibitively expensive due to increases in construction materials if the design took too long. Ms. Stafford acknowledged construction costs continued to increase, although because the City completed all the surveys and the base map models, moving from preliminary design to final design would not take very long and the project could go to construction during next summer. She noted there could be delays if a great deal of right-of-way was needed, however, the concept they proposed only required acquisition of right-of-way from one parcel and could be completed without that right-of-way if necessary. Projects could be delayed by utility locating, however, staff intends to involve the utilities early in the design to allow them to move facilities early in the process. She advised their cost estimates were based on bids received in the past two years plus an additional cushion and a 10% escalation. Councilmember Moore remarked two years was a long time in view of recent increases in construction costs. Ms. Stafford replied the City could also bid the project in segments. Councilmember Moore expressed her support for the project, noting it was a project the City had wanted to construct for a long time. She wanted the public to be aware that pieces of the project may not be constructed due to budgetary constraints. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONCUR WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW ON THE REZONE FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-6) TO OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (OR) FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SUNSET AVE. N. AND SOUTH OF BELL ST. THIS IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE REZONE INITIATED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO BRING THE ZONING OF THESE PROPERTIES INTO CONFORMITY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (FILE NO. R-07-14) As this was a quasi judicial matter, under the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, Mayor Haakenson asked whether any Councilmember had any ex parte communications or conflicts to disclose. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 7 of 463 Councilmember Marin disclosed he was friends with Mr. Huston from the VFW and had received a campaign contribution from Mr. Drew. He advised neither would impact his decision in the matter. Councilmember Orvis disclosed he received a campaign contribution from Mr. Huston and possibly from another party of record in an amount below $250. Councilmember Wambolt disclosed he received a small campaign contribution from Mr. Jacobsen. Councilmember Dawson advised she received similar campaign contributions which would not impact her ability to participate. Councilmember Plunkett disclosed he received a $100 contribution from Mr. Jacobsen and $100 from Mr. Huston. Mayor Haakenson asked whether any of the parties of record objected to any Councilmembers' participation. There were no objections voiced and Mayor Haakenson advised all Councilmembers would participate. Planning Manager Rob Chave recalled the Council's extensive process to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for these properties on the west side of Sunset Avenue south of Bell Street. Following the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the Council amended the Development Code to add a new OR (Office Residential) zone. Staff has proposed an administrative rezone due to the Comprehensive Plan designation and creation of the OR zone. The Planning Board held a public hearing and received no comment opposed to the proposed action. The Planning Board recommends the Council approve the rezone. Mayor Haakenson invited parties of record to provide comment. There were no parties of record present who wished to comment and Mayor Haakenson closed the opportunity for comment by parties of record. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO APPROVE THE REZONE REQUEST AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION. Councilmember Dawson expressed her pleasure at the work done by the Planning Board on this matter. She recalled instances in the past when there was little opposition and the record was somewhat incomplete. She appreciated Planning Board Member Freeman in particular for the record created supporting the Planning Board's recommendation. She urged the Planning Board to create a similar record for future matters. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, FIRE AND SUPPLEMENTAL CODE Building Official Jeannine Graf explained every three years the revised International Building, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical and Supplemental Code was presented to the Council for adoption. She referred to Exhibit 2, a redlined version of Title 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, and relayed staff s recommendation that the City Council direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance adopting the 2006 International Building, Fire, and Supplemental Code. Fire Marshal John Westfall was also present to answer questions. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, expressed support for adoption of the International Building, Fire and Supplemental Code. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 8 of 463 Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing and remanded the matter to Council for action. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE, BUILDING AND SUPPLEMENTAL CODES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. PUBLIC HEARING - CONSIDERATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT UNDER RCW 36.70B.170 TO PROVIDE VESTING TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 201 5TH AVENUE SOUTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (OLD MILLTOWN). THE AGREEMENT COVERS LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 37, 38, 39 AND 40, INCLUDING BOTH OLD MILLTOWN AND THE ADJACENT SITE. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the development agreement was proposed by Gregg Development Associates as part of a comprehensive settlement of a Land Use Petition Action and damage suit brought by Gregg Productions Associates. Although the matter had been discussed by the Council in Executive Session, the Council could not reach a decision in Executive Session and because the primary considerations for the settlement agreement was the development agreement, the Council could not make a commitment until there had been a public hearing. This was the public hearing and opportunity for discussion. Mr. Snyder explained a development agreement was a tool created by the Growth Management Act (GMA) to establish development requirements for particular property. While development agreements could cover a wide variety of subjects, all that was proposed in this agreement was that the property described in the agreement, Old Milltown and adjacent properties, be vested under the City Codes in effect on April 15, 2007, the date of their proposal. The date takes into account newly enacted BD zone requirements as well as changes to the City's Architectural Design Board process. While this was a contractual obligation, a development agreement was appealable under LUPA if it related to development approval. The Council must find the development agreement was consistent with the City's development regulations. The proposed development agreement requests no variations or changes in the development requirements established by City ordinance, only that the current provisions not be amended until January 15, 2008. Mr. Snyder explained the development agreement had been subject to negotiation between Mr. Gregg's legal counsel and him to insert the language that reserves the City's right to amend its codes if required by public health and safety, a requirement under GMA, and limit the period of vesting to January 15, 2008. He explained January 15, 2008 was the first Council meeting at which a new City Council could take action as new Councilmembers would be sworn in on January 8, 2008. Further, it was practically the soonest the current discussions with the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), Planning Board and Architectural Design Board (ADB) regarding new design standards for the BD 1 zone/Heritage Center could be implemented. He explained the public benefit was determined by the City Council following public input. From his perspective, the proposal was a reasonable solution to the existing situation. Councilmember Moore asked Mr. Snyder to expand on the existing situation. He responded the rightness/wrongness and public benefit was for the Council to decide. From a cost/benefit point -of -view, the amounts proposed in the settlement agreement were equivalent to what the City would spend on a successful, quick defense. The development agreement has only one condition - assurance that the development rules with regard to Mr. Gregg's property would not change for a period of time, a period of time that was consistent with the length of time for the Council to receive a recommendation and hold public hearings on the changes under consideration. Councilmember Moore summarized the Council would be agreeing in the development agreement not to change the rules even though it was unlikely they would be changed before January 2008 and in exchange Mr. Gregg would drop his lawsuit. Mr. Snyder agreed. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 6 Packet Page 9 of 463 Mr. Snyder suggested Mr. Gregg and his attorney be provided an opportunity to make comment prior to the public hearing. Mr. Gregg advised he would answer questions at the conclusion if necessary. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Joan Bloom, Edmonds, referred to Mr. Gregg's building at 5th & Walnut, the Gregory, calling it a "greedy building" because it occupied nearly the entire lot, partially or totally blocked many residents' views, provided no open space in spite of Mr. Gregg's promises to provide open space, was unwelcoming and uninviting and did not reflect the character and small town feel of Edmonds that citizens want preserved. She was concerned with the City giving Mr. Gregg carte blanche to do whatever he wanted with Old Milltown based on the current design guidelines, particularly the boardwalk. She recalled a quote of Mr. Gregg in the Edmonds Beacon that he would withdraw his lawsuit if the Council reached agreement on design guidelines, yet now he did not want to be subjected to the design guidelines. The design of the Gregory demonstrated Mr. Gregg did not understand or care what citizens wanted. She cited the importance of the boardwalk as a gathering place, commenting if Mr. Gregg were allowed to build under the current design guidelines, the building could extend to the sidewalk, eliminating the boardwalk. She encouraged Council not to approve the agreement. She referred to Mayor Haakenson's editorial regarding a citizen who filed a lawsuit against the City at a cost of $20,000 and asking citizens if they wanted their taxes spent in that manner and stating no good deed goes unpunished. She summarized if Council approved the development agreement, no bad deed would go unrewarded. She was concerned with the City paying Mr. Gregg $30,000 to drop the lawsuit in addition to legal costs. Elisabeth Larman, Edmonds, expressed her thanks to Mr. Snyder and the Building & Planning Department for answering her questions regarding the proposed development agreement for Old Milltown. She was disheartened by Mr. Gregg's lawsuit, recalling his stated desire to work with the City. She noted Mr. Hertrich and her families' lives and the entire city had been disturbed by Mr. Gregg's lawsuit against all of them. She understood the desire to settle the dispute with Mr. Gregg but did not want it to be at the expense of the City's patrimony. She viewed Old Milltown as a quintessential part of Edmonds, citing the importance of preservation and restoration to many residents including over 1,000 who signed a petition to save the building and have Mr. Gregg adhere to the City's codes and ordinances. She questioned why Old Milltown was included in the proposed development agreement when it was already vested and recommended the Council require Mr. Gregg provide additional information and plans for the proposed buildings on the adjacent lots to the east and south. She summarized only then could the Council make a proper decision regarding settling the lawsuit and ensuring Old Milltown would be refurbished as approved. Alan MacFarlane, Edmonds, voiced his concern with the area of Old Milltown in the southwest corner bordered by 5th Avenue South on the west and Maple Street on the south, the boardwalk area. He noted this wonderful, open space area was a symbol of historic Edmonds and needed to be retained as it currently exists. He cited the importance of the boardwalk area because it drew people to the downtown area, people drawn downtown spend money in downtown stores, and removing the boardwalk area would result in lost revenue and other negative impacts. Pointing out the City did not have a City Square, he urged the Council to retain "this little park" to draw people to downtown Edmonds. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, provided copies of plan review documents for the present Old Milltown project, pointing out the Engineering Department had 34 questions and the Building Department had 44 questions. He referred to the Building Official's statement that the project was considered a redesign, noting what originally was presented to the Council was being changed. He cited several questions/requests for information posed by staff including information on demolition phases 2 and 3, site plan difficult to read, prints difficult to read, alternate design for gluelam beams and the need for height calculations, parking requirements, floor plan of the basement, and details of the east wall and rooftop mechanical equipment. He noted the number of questions, changes and issues raised question with how Mr. Gregg operated. He recommended omitting Old Milltown from the agreement as it was already vested and requiring Mr. Gregg submit a concept of his plans for the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 7 Packet Page 10 of 463 remainder of the site. He referred to an Engineering Department comment that it appeared the building was set up for a third floor of residential. In his view the City was giving away more that it got with the agreement. He recommended holding another public hearing after Mr. Gregg submitted a concept of his plans for the site. He was concerned Council was doing planning in Executive Session, noting the development agreement was scheduled for a public hearing long before any information was available to the public. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, agreed discussions should have been held in open meeting. He commented the City's concern was cost but another consideration was the character of downtown. He referred to higher building heights and increasing retail activity on Hwy. 99. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, questioned whether this was a quasi judicial hearing, remarking if it was, Mayor Haakenson had not asked for Council disclosures. He found the use of a development agreement in this circumstance inappropriate, pointing out the number of criteria provided in the RCW, yet the development agreement was only used for one - to allow Mr. Gregg to vest the property. He expressed concern with the City Attorney allowing the State legislature to usurp local land use rules; questioning the opportunity for public participation to adopt this land use tool in Edmonds. He noted there were numerous land use tools in the RCW that the City had not adopted, for example the City adopted the Hearing Examiner method but had eliminated the Board of Adjustment. He found it inappropriate not to include the public in the process and for the Council to make decisions in Executive Session that changed land use laws. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Mr. Gregg was again provided an opportunity to speak which he declined. In response to Ms. Bloom's and Mr. Hertrich's assertions that the development agreement gave Mr. Gregg carte blanche to do whatever he wanted, Mr. Snyder assured the only thing the development agreement provided was that Mr. Gregg had until January 15, 2008 to submit plans under the codes that exist in the City. He was receiving no waivers, no variances, and must follow the same process to develop the property. In regard to Mr. Hertrich's suggestion that Mr. Gregg be required to present plans, Mr. Snyder advised if Mr. Gregg could present plans, he could vest under the code and did not need the development agreement. He reiterated January 15, 2008 was approximately the same period of time it would take to adopt new development regulations. In response to Ms. Bloom's comment that the City was paying Mr. Gregg $30,000 in addition to legal costs, Mr. Snyder explained the amount proposed to be paid was approximately the amount to win the lawsuit. With regard to Ms. Larman's desire to preserve patrimony, he explained settling the lawsuit would ensure Mr. Gregg's design as approved and underway, that Ms. Larman fought for, would be built. With regard to Mr. MacFarlane's desire to preserve the open space, Mr. Snyder explained under current City ordinance, development in the downtown area was lot line to lot line. If the City attempted to regulate and prohibit development lot line to lot line, it must purchase the property via a direct purchase or inverse condemnation. With regard to Mr. Hertrich's comments about questions raised by Engineering and Building Departments regarding the design under construction, Mr. Snyder advised to his knowledge there had been no revisions to the design approved by the ADB. He noted Old Milltown was a very old building and things were discovered as construction got underway. He suggested the Council direct questions with regard to the building permit to Development Services Director Duane Bowman. With regard to the allegation that something occurred in Executive Session, Mr. Snyder advised once the process was concluded, all Executive Session minutes would be available to the public. As the minutes would reveal, he was very clear to the Council when this was discussed that a settlement proposal had been presented to the Council; the settlement proposal depended upon passage of the development agreement. He assured he had not polled the Council and only sought reactions and feedback regarding negotiating the terms. He had advised the Council they could not make a decision in Executive Session and that they should not give direction Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 8 Packet Page 11 of 463 regarding the development agreement. The Council was not asked their opinion regarding the development agreement in Executive Session as that could only be done in open session after a public hearing. Mr. Snyder referred to Mr. Hertrich's assertion that the Council was taking action in Executive Session, explaining as soon as the Executive Session was complete the City Clerk showed a development agreement and settlement agreement on the extended agenda and notice of the public hearing was provided to property owners, published and posted on the City's website. The development agreement and settlement agreement terms were being negotiated between Mr. Gregg's attorney and him; as soon he received a final development agreement, within ten minutes it was provided electronically to Mr. Hertrich's attorney, Ms. Larman, the City Clerk, the Enterprise, and was posted on the City's website. Within an hour it was available for public review. With regard to amending by statute, Mr. Snyder explained the Hearing Examiner statute specifically provides that if the City Council adopts a Hearing Examiner system, it is done via ordinance. The GMA provides for a development agreement which is a legislative decision unless the agreement addresses a development approval. He acknowledged the development agreement contained only one of the 8-9 issues that could be addressed by a development agreement. He reiterated Mr. Gregg received no waivers, variances, fee reductions, etc. via the agreement, only assurance that the rules related to his development of the property would not change. Development Services Director Duane Bowman advised the comments the Council was provided were plan review comments for a building permit which was not a quasi judicial matter but a matter between the Building and Planning Department with a permit applicant as they proposed a project. The City's review comments drew from the permit submittal; the applicant was required to respond to ensure when the permit was finalized they were compliant with adopted codes. The comments had nothing to do with the development agreement. The developer was required to comply with all City Codes and the ADB's review. Councilmember Wambolt asked Mr. Snyder to clarify that this was not a quasi judicial hearing. Mr. Snyder advised a development agreement could fix specific requirements and address specific approvals. When that occurred, it was subject to LUPA review. In this instance, a permit would follow the development agreement which would be quasi judicial. The proposed development agreement was a legislative decision on a proposed contractual element. Councilmember Wambolt referred to Mr. Hertrich's suggestion that the development agreement only cover the portion of the property to the south and not the portion for which a permit was being sought. He asked whether that would be advantageous to the City. Mr. Snyder responded Mr. Gregg could apply for a new approval but would do so under the new code provisions which were more restrictive than the old code provisions. He noted one of the advantages of settling the lawsuit was citizens would be assured the second plan which Ms. Larman and Mr. Hertrich fought for would be constructed. He acknowledged Mr. Gregg could stop at any time and file a new application but did not view that as a good business practice. Councilmember Orvis asked whether the development agreement would preclude the Council from purchasing any section of these properties to preserve open space. Mr. Snyder answered no, commenting if the City wanted to preserve open space on a lot line to lot line project or create a public meeting place/square, the City's obligation would be to condemn or purchase it via negotiation; anything else would be an unconstitutional taking of property. Councilmember Dawson commented the development agreement provided some degree of assurance that the second plan that the citizens fought for would be built. She noted the current plan was still somewhat in play legally speaking due to the lawsuit; if Mr. Gregg were to prevail in that lawsuit, presumably he could proceed with the first plan. She asked what assurance the development agreement provided that the second plan would be built? She inquired whether there was anything in the agreement that precluded Mr. Gregg from taking the money in the settlement and reapplying for the first plan again or if that was precluded due to the dismissal with Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 9 Packet Page 12 of 463 prejudice provision? Mr. Snyder stated the lawsuit and damage claims relating to the first process would be at an end. Mr. Gregg, like any other applicant, could stop work on the project although that would be questionable from a business point of view as the new process would take at least 120 days during which time the building would need to be preserved or demolished. He advised there was no legal reason why Mr. Gregg could not abandon the design and start over although there were many practical reasons. Councilmember Dawson asked Mr. Gregg why the portion of the property that was already vested and in the process of construction was included in the development agreement. Bob Gregg stated that question was not raised by any of the attorneys during negotiation and he objected to revising the development agreement at this point due to concern with unintended consequences of making last minute revisions. He assured he had not asked for anything in the development agreement that was not already provided on April 15. The City, via a very public process, took several years including 2-3 years of building moratoriums to develop the code. His request was that the code not be changed for a period of time to allow him sufficient time to develop plans under stable, unchanging rules. He noted they originally requested 12-18 months and Mr. Snyder asked for seven months. He commented that he was unaware that the appeal of an appeal was litigation; therefore, although he was being accused of suing, he was only exercising his right to an appeal of an appeal. He commented the settlement agreement was a windfall to the City. He concluded he was not interested in reopening/renegotiating the development agreement due to concern with unintended consequences. Mr. Gregg stated if he wanted to withdraw and resubmit Plan 1, he would have every right to do so, subject to appeal. He assured they had absolutely no intention of doing so. If the answer was it was unintentional that the portion of the property that was already vested was included in the development agreement and he had no intension of resubmitting plans for Old Milltown, Councilmember Dawson was unclear why Mr. Gregg would not agree to strike that portion of the agreement, particularly as he had every right to resubmit notwithstanding a development agreement. She asked Mr. Gregg why he would not agree to strike that portion of the development agreement if it would make everyone more comfortable and if the Council's purpose was to ensure the second building plan was built rather than another version the public may not approve of. Mr. Gregg asked why the Council did not assure him the rules would not change for six or ten months. Councilmember Dawson answered assuming the Council could assure him the development rules would not change for six months which she noted was unlikely anyway, would he then agree to strike that portion of the agreement. Mr. Gregg answered no, not during an election year. Councilmember Dawson clarified Mr. Gregg would not assure he would not submit a different plan than the one that had been approved. Mr. Gregg answered he would give the same assurance if the City would not change the rules in the meantime. Councilmember Dawson clarified the Council was agreeing to one thing but he was not agreeing to the other by not agreeing to strike it from the development agreement. Councilmember Plunkett did not understand the applicant's concern about the rules changing, commenting the point of vesting was once an application was made, the Council could change the rules and the applicant continued to build under the code that was in place when the project vested. He asked whether the applicant was vested regardless of changes that may be made to the code. Mr. Snyder explained under State law an applicant was vested when a fully completed building permit application was submitted. The City Code also provides for vesting of the design via the ADB process and in this case a design had been vested. Mr. Gregg could file an ADB or building permit application to vest the other portions of the project at any time. Councilmember Moore asked Mayor Haakenson his recommendation with regard to the development agreement. Mayor Haakenson read staff and his recommendation from the Agenda Memo, "This development agreement is associated with the proposed settlement agreement. If the City Council, after taking public testimony, is inclined to approve the agreement then the Mayor should be authorized to sign the development agreement," summarizing it was a policy decision for the Council to make. He noted it appeared based on this Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 10 Packet Page 13 of 463 Council's history of legislative deliberation, the Council would not approve any new codes between now and January 2008 and it appeared Mr. Gregg was concerned about the rules changing before January 2008. He referred to Mr. Snyder's indication that this was a fair settlement, it protected Mr. Hertrich and Ms. Larman's desire for the building to be built as they fought for, it was a win for the City from a financial standpoint and the City did not give up anything to Mr. Gregg that he did not already have. Councilmember Plunkett referred to Mayor Haakenson's statement that the building would be constructed based on the second plan, yet although Mr. Gregg stated that was his intent, he would not commit to that in the development agreement. Mr. Gregg advised the building permit application was subject to design review that was approved, Plan 2 was what they were currently proceeding with. He noted any time an applicant submitted an application, various City departments conducted due diligence over an approximately 28 day review period. In his experience in Edmonds and other jurisdictions, the result was not a permit but a list of questions about the application that was submitted, in this instance a list of 117 questions. He noted the HPC, ADB and Planning Board when proposing code revisions needed to consult with staff as there were numerous items that those groups wanted that could not be done. Councilmember Plunkett stated Mr. Gregg's intent was to build the second plan but in his discussion with Councilmember Dawson he was unwilling to commit to that in the development agreement. Mr. Gregg agreed, commenting he was not happy with Plan 1, feeling it was rushed. He noted Plan 2 resulted in an extreme conflict - the ADB and the approved process did not allow the storefronts to be extended to the sidewalk. His intent was to leave it because they could not remodel it to make it functional and practical. He noted many of the 117 questions were in regard to the unused portion to the east which he noted could not be left alone and needed to be brought up to code. He expressed frustration that despite the fact they could not remodel it, it had to be brought up to code. The reason he did not want to commit was because they did not have Plan 2 flushed out yet and needed time to do so. He noted the voluntary pre -conference with the ADB had been replaced by a two -stage process. If they came with their plans "on the back of an envelope" in an effort to get a great deal of public input and then have more specific plans developed, he envisioned emergency Council meetings to amend the code. He concluded they were moving forward with the plan that was approved under the old code; if he were to withdraw it and change it and return to Plan 1, it would be under the new code. He commented if he resubmitted Plan 1, it would likely be approved as it was approved by staff twice, approved by the ADB twice, remanded by Council once and rejected by Council once in a decision that he felt was in error. Without the graciousness of the settlement agreement, Plan 1 would be approved and the City would be paying $250,000. Mr. Snyder summarized the appeal of the rejection of Plan 1 would be dropped under the settlement agreement. Mr. Gregg agreed "Plan 1 is dead;" if he wanted to reactivate Plan 1 he would have to go back through the entire process and under the current code. Mr. Snyder summarized Plan 2 would remain vested and Mr. Gregg was reserving the right to stop construction and reapply and go through the entire process again. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether a project was vested when the building permit was applied for or when it was approved. Mr. Snyder described how projects could vest including when a fully completed building permit application with a fee was filed with the City, via multiple approval processes, via an alternative vesting provision for ADB applications and via a development agreement under GMA. He noted Old Milltown Plan 2 design was vested by application. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Councilmember Marin relayed his experience as a general contractor building new homes in 13 jurisdictions and his frustration with inspections that differed in each jurisdiction. The development agreement was an opportunity to provide certainty that the rules would remain the same, an opportunity for Mr. Gregg to withdraw Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 11 Packet Page 14 of 463 gracefully from the lawsuit and an opportunity to conclude the lawsuit in a manner that was equitable to the City. He expressed his support for the development agreement. Council President Olson expressed her support for the development agreement, commenting in a negotiation both parties need to feel they are getting something. She liked that Plan 1 would be dead and the building would be built in accordance with Plan 2. Further, the City was not giving anything away and the matter would not go to court with both sides spending a great deal of money. She viewed the development agreement as a good compromise. Councilmember Wambolt agreed with Ms. Bloom's aversion to giving away $30,000, noting the alternative as described by Mr. Snyder was worse, possibly losing the lawsuit which would cost the City a great deal more than legal fees. Although there were pros and cons, in view of the recommendation from the City Attorney, he would support approval of the development agreement. Councilmember Dawson agreed it was unlikely the development rules would be changed between now and the time period referenced in the development agreement. She acknowledged even if the Council agreed now, it would be difficult to adopt them by January 2008 based on past practice, the Planning Board's schedule, etc. She commented when she first reviewed this matter she felt the City was not giving up anything because there were no plans to change the rules and she could appreciate Mr. Gregg's desire for certainty with regard to the portion of the building that was not currently in process. Although she originally planned to vote in favor of the development agreement, Mr. Gregg had convinced her otherwise tonight. She was no longer persuaded the City was getting anything from the development agreement because she was no longer convinced based on Mr. Gregg's comments that the second plan would be built. She was concerned that if the Council approved the development agreement and the settlement agreement, this particular lawsuit could be dropped, the City would pay $30,000 and Mr. Gregg could institute another plan and the City could not preclude it. She acknowledged Mr. Gregg could do that regardless of whether the Council approved the development agreement. She was concerned with Mr. Gregg's unwillingness to exempt Old Milltown from the development agreement. She was willing to refer the matter for further negotiations and could agree to the development agreement if the portion of the site that was already vested were removed but could not approve the development agreement as proposed. Councilmember Moore commented she did not attend the Executive Session where this was discussed and noted apparently during the Executive Session there was some direction from the Council to the City Attorney to craft the development agreement. As she did not attend the Executive Session and did not know what had transpired, she planned to abstain from the vote. Councilmember Dawson assured there was no decision made by the Council in Executive Session. There was direction given to the City Attorney to negotiate a development agreement and return for a public hearing. Once this matter was concluded, the minutes would clearly indicate that that was all the Council, as appropriate under the law, had done. Councilmember Moore responded she did not intend to imply a decision was made but that some direction was given to the City Attorney. Mr. Snyder cautioned the Council against discussing what had occurred in Executive Session. He explained he had an ethical obligation to present a settlement agreement made to him to the Council as his client. The proposal was made by Mr. Gregg and his attorney and discussed with the Council in Executive Session. He assured no member of the Council indicated a position on the development agreement because from the first Executive Session, the Council was informed they could not do so in Executive Session. He urged Councilmember Moore to consider voting, advising that she, like all Councilmembers, must make a decision based on the public hearing and the documents provided. He assured no member of the Council had any information that Councilmember Moore did not. Councilmember Dawson noted it was a Councilmember's prerogative to vote yes, no or abstain. She supported Councilmember Moore obtaining additional legal advice from Mr. Snyder if necessary prior to the vote. Councilmember Moore answered that was unnecessary. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 12 Packet Page 15 of 463 Councilmember Plunkett commented the only way a Councilmember could abstain was if he/she did not have sufficient information. He asked whether Mayor Haakenson could vote if Ms. Moore did not. Mr. Snyder answered Mayor Haakenson could vote on the development agreement; he could not vote on the passage of an ordinance, letting of a franchise or appropriation of funds. He clarified Mayor Haakenson could not vote on the settlement agreement. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS MOORE, PLUNKETT, MARIN, AND WAMBOLT IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS AND DAWSON OPPOSED. 8. APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - GREGG PRODUCTIONS, INC. V. CITY OF EDMONDS; CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL OF AGENDA ITEM 7. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the terms of the settlement agreement were in the record. The settlement agreement was presented with his and Washington Cities Insurance Authority's recommendation. The $30,000 payment was approximately equivalent to the cost of winning a LUPA and avoided damage claims on summary judgment in a best case scenario. In his view it was a wash with regard to cost. He noted the third item in the settlement agreement was the City would treat Mr. Gregg fairly in the permit process as was the City's obligation with respect to every applicant. COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Councilmember Plunkett advised the reason he voted in favor of the development agreement was the money and the code. He noted the code was vague and he was not confident it would stand up to a challenge. He explained the reason historic design standards for downtown were being created was to be able to require future projects to meet historic design standards. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS MOORE, PLUNKETT, MARIN, AND WAMBOLT IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS AND DAWSON OPPOSED. 9. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Jesse Scott, Edmonds, urged the Council to favorably consider the next agenda item, award of the contract for the sidewalk on 164th Street. He explained the project was actually a rework of the roadway in an attempt to resolve a safety issue. He pointed out recently an Edmonds fire engine was unable to negotiate the turn, the only access to an area of 150 homes, wedging itself on the hill. A Lynnwood fire truck approached from the opposite direction and responded. His major concern was children walking on the street on their way to school, commenting it was only a matter of time before a child was injured. He recalled engineering work for the project was approved three years ago but a contract was not approved. Last year he appeared before the Council with a petition from homeowners urging the Council to take action. At that time the Council approved it but no contract was approved. He noted the Council's inaction had cost citizens approximately $300,000 as the cost of the project was now $525,000. He was unconcerned about the funding as it was from the same source for a $945,000 sidewalk that led to the North Meadowdale County Park. He expressed concern with the $345,000 the Council approved for the 162°d Street park, only four blocks from the County Park. He urged the Council to use common sense and favorably consider the 164th Street sidewalk project. David Page, Edmonds, expressed concern with members of the public who complained about the Council in the press where the Council had little ability to respond. Although he disagreed with the Council on occasion and acknowledged the Council sometimes made mistakes, he appreciated their hard work and dedication. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, thanked Councilmember Marin for attending the Kiwanis Club meeting. He provided an update regarding the Snohomish County Superior Court decision on the SW Edmonds Neighborhood Park Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 13 Packet Page 16 of 463 and the 21 day appeal process. Next, he inquired about the fence around the old Woodway Elementary School playfields and recommended it be removed immediately. He also referred to a Hearing Examiner meeting regarding a new 27-home development. Elisabeth Larman, Edmonds, thanked Councilmember Dawson and Councilmember Orvis for their courage with regard to their vote on the development agreement and settlement agreement. Next, she pointed out the proposed park in front of the boardwalk was not City property and was concerned the City could lose that property. She challenged Councilmember Moore to spearhead the effort to preserve that park. Gary Humiston, Edmonds, commented on the fence around the fields at the old Woodway Elementary School playfields. As it appeared people continued to use the fields, he and others should be allowed access. He inquired about the location of the gate to access the field and whether the Interlocal Agreement for the fields remained in effect. Kevin Clarke, Edmonds, recalled the opportunity to serve on a Commission with a great deal of controversy, the Citizens Commission on Salaries for Elected Officials, commenting much could be learned from the Pirates Council in Pirates of the Caribbean III. He noted the Council addressed many difficult issues, yet were often crucified in the press for those decisions. He commented on his experience driving behind the procession for Police Chief Stern and his pride at being a resident of Edmonds. He expressed his thanks to the Council for all they do. Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, stated no one impugned the motives of the Council but they were not excused from making gross errors. He recalled being the victim of the erroneous application of a law for the construction of a building illegally approved contrary to the unambiguous words of the code. He asserted the City attempted to create a sense of ambiguity to allow construction of 3-story buildings. Next, he recalled hearing that the cost of the old Woodway Elementary school property was $16 million when in reality the cost for the entire site was $8 million and only $4 million for the property the City did not purchase. He then commented on the fence at the old Woodway Elementary school, pointing out that area was still listed as a park in the Chamber of Commerce publication. He summarized additional density and elimination of open space was a formula that did not increase the residents' well being. He concluded not purchasing the entire parcel was a mistake. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, thanked Councilmember Dawson for her reaction to Mr. Gregg's comments. He expressed concern with Mr. Gregg's unwillingness to negotiate and the Council's decision not to try to get more from Mr. Gregg. He referred to the current empty condition of Old Milltown, asserting it was awaiting more changes by Mr. Gregg. He noted Mr. Gregg never described his plans for the south end and he anticipated the current parking would be third story condominiums in the future with excavation below for parking. He anticipated the project would continue to grow and change. 10. REPORT OF BIDS OPENED ON MAY 8, 2007 FOR THE 164TH STREET SW WALKWAY AND THE 74TH PLACE WEST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION, INC. ($545,565.00) City Engineer Dave Gebert explained due to the proximity of these projects in the Meadowdale area and similarities in the work, they were combined into one project. Bids were opened on May 8; three bids were submitted, all above estimates. The low bid was $545,646; the engineer's estimate was $318,878. The invitation for bids included two projects: Schedule A - 164th Street SW walkway and Scheduled B - 74th Place West drainage improvements. 164th Street SW Walkway Mr. Gebert explained this had become a more expensive project than originally anticipated 12-18 months ago and in 2002-2003 when the project was designed. The low bid for Schedule A, the walkway portion of the bid, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 14 Packet Page 17 of 463 was $412,686, the engineer's estimate was $255,135 and the budget in Fund 125 Parks Improvement was $270,000. The reason the project had become so expensive was the current bidding climate as well as project scope. With regard to the current construction industry bidding climate, he explained the construction industry was experiencing rapidly escalating bids, especially on public projects. He recalled a recent Sound Transit station that received one bid for $90 million and the engineer's estimate was $50 million. He noted before advertising for bids the engineer's estimate was reviewed and updated, however, it appeared the amount did not accurately account for the market conditions and degree of difficulty anticipated by bidders. With regard to project scope, Mr. Gebert explained the site of this project has very challenging topography; 164th Street SW is a steep, narrow, curving road, with steep slopes on both sides and there is insufficient space to install a sidewalk that would meet current safety standards. He displayed several photographs that illustrated the topography on the site. He summarized that although this was a walkway project, installation of the sidewalk required major road reconstruction including significant excavation, reconstruction, widening of the road, relocation of a water main, and installation of a retaining wall. In addition, construction of sidewalks requires compliance with current Federal standards for ADA curb ramps, which requires additional reconstruction at the intersection of 164th Street SW and North Meadowdale Road, where the current configuration is a very sharp and steep turn. Because 164th Street SW is the only public road providing access to this neighborhood of approximately 150 homes, traffic flow must be maintained during construction. This results in significant traffic control costs. He concluded this walkway project in essence had become a road reconstruction project. He displayed a drawing illustrating the sidewalk, retaining wall, excavation and reconstruction, guardrail, and ADA curb ramps. Mr. Gebert reviewed options considered by staff: • Adjustments to the scope or design to reduce the cost by change order - staff was not able to identify any significant cost reductions within the current design • Reevaluate other design alternatives previously rejected - any significant redesign would require deferring the construction a year (due to the steep slopes and the need to perform construction in this location during dry summer months) and rebidding the project, and would involve additional design costs, with no assurance at this point of a less expensive project. • Defer the project and advertise for bids again next year - no basis for expecting a better bidding climate next year. • Install the sidewalk only - staff concluded a safe sidewalk could not be constructed without all the roadway reconstruction After careful review by staff, Mr. Gebert advised the following practical options were identified: 1. Appropriate additional funds and award the contract 2. Cancel the project for this year, review redesign alternatives, redesign as appropriate, and advertise for bids again next year 3. Cancel the project completely He explained to award a contract to the low bidder for Schedule A (164th Street SW Walkway) would require approximately $495,500 which includes the bid amount and contingency, engineering, material testing, public art, etc. The budget for the walkway portion was $270,000; an additional $225,500 was necessary to award the project. He described funding sources considered and staff s conclusion that the road was seriously deteriorated and needed to be repaved soon, whether or not a sidewalk was constructed. He displayed several photographs illustrating the poor condition of the roadway. For that reason and because the project included a number of road reconstruction items, if Council wants to proceed with the 164th Street SW Walkway project, staff recommends moving forward $225,500 of the $550,000 budgeted in 2008 in Fund 125 (REET2 Transportation Projects) to 2007 to fund the 164th Street SW Walkway project instead of citywide street overlays. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 15 Packet Page 18 of 463 74th Place West Drainage Improvements Mr. Gebert explained this was an emergent drainage problem identified subsequent to preparation of the 2007- 2008 capital budget. The funds required to award the contract are $158,000 which includes the contract bid amount as well as contingency, construction engineering, etc. There is $70,000 included in the 2007 capital budget for general Meadowdale drainage projects. An additional $88,000 is required to award Schedule B for the 74th Place West Drainage Improvements project. There is sufficient cash balance in Fund 412 for utilities capital projects. Mr. Gebert relayed staff s recommendation that the Council appropriate the additional $225,500 from Fund 125 (REET2 Transportation Projects) for the walkway and appropriate an additional $88,000 in Fund 412 200 and award the contract to Trimaxx Construction, Inc. in the amount of $545,565. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether it would be impractical to award the two contracts to two different contractors. Mr. Gebert answered that would not be ethical; the City's procedure was the lower bid was based on the total of the schedules. Councilmember Wambolt questioned why the projects were bid separately if they could not be awarded separately. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the schedules were bid as one project and the project would need to be rebid to separate the schedules. Councilmember Wambolt reiterated this was two different projects. Mr. Gebert explained it was bid as one contract and one bid invitation. Councilmember Wambolt noted Trimaxx was the lowest in total but not the lowest on either schedule. Mr. Gebert explained the projects were bid together as they were in close proximity and due to the need to coordinate the traffic control between projects. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether the bidders' understanding was they would be awarded the entire project or nothing. Mr. Gebert answered yes, noting another option would be to award only one schedule. Councilmember Moore stated although she understood the construction industry climate, staff knew the difficulty with regard to the scope of the project. She asked why the engineer's estimate was far below the bids. Mr. Gebert stated staff considered the scope in the estimate but underestimated the unit prices for the quantities. Councilmember Moore pointed out the difference between the bid and the engineer's estimate for traffic control, recalling the traffic control was under -estimated in another project. Mr. Gebert advised the engineer's estimate of $20,000 for traffic control would typically be a very large amount; the bid was $38,000. Because this was an isolated location and trucking costs were expensive, the bidders viewed it as a more difficult and complex project. He noted the Council would soon be provided a bid for the 100th Avenue slope stabilization where the low bids again were considerably higher than the engineer's estimate. He noted some of the engineer's estimates were developed by staff and others were developed by consultants. Staff met today with the low bidder on the 100th Avenue slope stabilization project today to determine if there were ways to reduce the cost. The contractor informed him they no longer take into account the engineer's estimates when bidding a project. Councilmember Moore asked what would be sacrificed by reallocating these funds. Mr. Gebert answered overlays in other areas. The rationale for the funding source was much of the project was road repair and road reconstruction. Councilmember Moore asked what other roads would not receive an overlay if this project were financed from that funding source. Mr. Gebert answered that had not yet been determined. Councilmember Plunkett asked why staff did not recommend review of design alternatives. Mr. Gebert answered redesign would result in a one year delay as the work must be done during summer months, there was no assurance the project costs would be less, and there would be additional costs to redesign the project. He explained during the design process in 2002-2003 several design alternatives were considered and rejected. Councilmember Plunkett asked if there were other design alternatives that could be reviewed. Mr. Gebert explained factors considered in rejecting the other alternatives included geotechnical issues due to unstable soils, degree of difficulty transitioning a sidewalk to North Meadowdale Road, safety issues and cost factors. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 16 Packet Page 19 of 463 summarized the result of reviewing design alternatives was additional cost for redesign and advertising, a one- year delay, and only possibly a less expensive project. Councilmember Wambolt recalled REET2 collections in excess of $750,000 were allocated to Fund 125 and those funds had generally been stronger than projected. Therefore other overlays may not need to be delayed. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, THAT THE COUNCIL APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $225,000 IN FUND 125 (BEET 2 TRANSPORTATION) AND AN ADDITIONAL $88,000 IN FUND 412-200 (DRAINAGE PROJECTS), AND AWARD A CONTRACT TO TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION., INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $545,565.00 FOR THE 164TH STREET SW WALKWAY AND THE 74TH PLACE WEST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. Councilmember Orvis expressed support for the motion, commenting although it was a difficult decision, this roadway served an entire neighborhood and he did not envision the project getting less expensive. Council President Olson acknowledged these were expensive projects but she supported them. She noted it was the Council's responsibility to ensure neighborhoods were accessible. Councilmember Moore agreed this was a necessary improvement and was a high priority. She was concerned the engineer's estimates would need to be doubled or tripled in the future, an issue that needed to be considered during preparation of the budget. She pointed out the importance of developing a strategic plan to identify the source of funds in the future. Councilmember Marin commented it was difficult for the engineer to estimate staging and sequencing. He anticipated the contractor would have difficulty identifying a staging area nearby to store materials and equipment as well as have difficulty sequencing the project. Councilmember Wambolt commented the estimate for demolition of the old Woodway Elementary was a fraction of the estimate, and the City was saving several hundred thousand dollars. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ifluEVC43.YM4111alu1a]a0 Mayor Haakenson commented that although the Council would always be asked to do due diligence to reduce costs, it was apparent costs would continue to increase and the Council must consider the source of funds to cover these increasing costs. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Olson wished Councilmember Wambolt a belayed Happy Birthday on June 1. She also commended the Noon Rotary for the Waterfront Festival, remarking events were a great way to promote Edmonds. Councilmember Wambolt referred to Mr. Bernheim's comments regarding the elimination of open space, explaining the City was eliminating buildings, not open space. With regard to Mr. Hertrich's assertion that the Council did not gain anything from settling the lawsuit with Mr. Gregg, he pointed out the benefit to the City was the lawsuit was dropped. Although he had some of the same reservations about Mr. Gregg due to his past performance, he believed the development agreement and settlement agreement made the best of the situation. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 17 Packet Page 20 of 463 Councilmember Dawson relayed that her husband and she played tennis at Seaview Park and took a walk on the Edmonds beach this weekend which made her feel like she was on vacation in her own town. She remarked on what a wonderful place Edmonds was and felt blessed to live here. Councilmember Marin reported flu season was winding down and the West Nile Virus season was beginning. He described the Health District's program that included the collection of dead birds that were inspected for West Nile Virus infection as well as the trapping of mosquitoes to determine whether they were the variety that carried West Nile Virus. He explained only the female of one variety carried the virus. He advised when the Health District identified a location that was a vector for the virus, the city was contacted and informed where larvaeside may need to be placed. Councilmember Moore inquired about the fence on the old Woodway Elementary School site. Mr. Clarke advised it was on the developer's property. Student Representative Callahan reported Special Olympics Washington concluded this weekend. He volunteered for the Edmonds School District Special Olympics team and urged the public to volunteer. Next, he remarked much of high school literature was intended to teach students that doing the right thing was always right in the long run. He commented people visited Edmonds because of its uniqueness - a small, friendly town with a true downtown with buildings from a bygone era. He feared that faced with a difficult decision tonight, the majority of the Council disregarded the opportunity to do the right thing. He urged the Council not to lose sight of what Edmonds meant to the region. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:11 p.m Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 5, 2007 Page 18 Packet Page 21 of 463 AM-1057 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Debbie Karber Submitted For: Dan Clements Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Infarmntinn Subject Title Approval of claim checks #96752 through #96911 for June 7, 2007 in the amount of $342,282.42, and #96912 through #97087 for June 14, 2007 in the amount of $607,134.06. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #44897 through #44971 for the period of May 16 through May 31, 2007 in the amount of $814,306.98. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Fkeal Venr_ 2007 Revenue: Expenditure: $1,763,723.38 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $949,416.48 Payroll: $814,306.90 Link: Claim Cks 6-7-07 Link: Claim Cks 6-14-07 Route Seq Inbox Admin Services Fiscal Impact AttnehmPntc Form Routing/Status Approved By Date Status Kathleen Junglov 06/14/2007 02:15 PM APRV Packet Page 22 of 463 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 02:29 PM APRV Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Started On: 06/14/2007 02:01 PM Packet Page 23 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96752 6/6/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS May 2007 MAY 2007 DRS May 2007 DRS contribution 811.000.000.231.540.000.00 169,841.69 Total : 169,841.69 96753 6/7/2007 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 0607405 VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE T-SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 259.56 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 23.10 Total : 282.66 96754 6/7/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070531 INV#1201641-20070531 SEARCHES/REPORTS FOR MAY 2( 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 43.25 Total : 43.25 96755 6/7/2007 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-84278 STREET - 50LB BAGS GLASS BEAC STREET - 50LB BAGS GLASS BEAC 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2,319.84 Freight 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 351.11 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 237.71 Total : 2,908.66 96756 6/7/2007 068857 AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL INC x30918092 SR CENTER - PROFESSIONAL SEF SR CENTER - PROFESSIONAL SEF 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 2,380.00 Total : 2,380.00 96757 6/7/2007 069829 AMIDO, BENJAMIM AMID08483 UKULELE CLASSES UKULELE CLASS #8483 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 196.00 Total : 196.00 Page: 1 Packet Page 24 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96758 6/7/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3889030 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.00 Total : 36.76 96759 6/7/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3889032 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.42 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.60 Total : 93.02 96760 6/7/2007 071092 ARCTIC PRINTING & GRAPHICS 125899 ANNUAL REPORT PRINTING PRINTING OF ANNUAL REPORT FC 123.000.640.573.100.490.00 545.00 Sales Tax 123.000.640.573.100.490.00 48.51 Total : 593.51 96761 6/7/2007 071120 ASHLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 2500032534 113009/0702 POLYMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.51 3,875.00 Total : 3,875.00 96762 6/7/2007 001670 ASSOCIATED GLASS 1063123 FS 16 - SHOWER DOOR REPAIR S' FS 16 - SHOWER DOOR REPAIR S' 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 77.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.90 Total : 84.40 96763 6/7/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 558993 75179 Page: 2 Packet Page 25 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96763 6/7/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM (Continued) DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,382.34 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 190.59 Total : 2,572.93 96764 6/7/2007 069451 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 00091296 WATER QUALITY - BACKFLOW TE: WATER QUALITY - BACKFLOW TE: 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 55.00 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 11.24 Total : 66.24 96765 6/7/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-1124 PARKS MAINT. BLDG PARKS MAINT. BLDG 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 26.50 Total : 26.50 96766 6/7/2007 064343 AT&T 425-775-2525 MAIN LINE Main Line 3/7-4/7/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 118.50 425-775-2525 MAIN LINE Main Line 4/7-5/7/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 36.44 Total : 154.94 96767 6/7/2007 067571 AWWA-KING CO SUBSECTION 3832 Registration: Water Main Constructio Registration: Water Main Constructio 001.000.620.532.200.490.00 100.00 Total : 100.00 96768 6/7/2007 002070 BALANCING SERVICE CO INC 10074 BALANCE IMPELLER & SHAFT BALANCE IMPELLER & SHAFT 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 225.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 20.03 Page: 3 Packet Page 26 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96768 6/7/2007 002070 002070 BALANCING SERVICE CO INC (Continued) Total : 245.03 96769 6/7/2007 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 9039 DAY CAMP AD DAYCAMP AD IN GUIDE TO EDMOI 001.000.640.574.200.440.00 380.00 Total : 380.00 96770 6/7/2007 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 343677 FLEET SHOP - ROTOR FLEET SHOP - ROTOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 184.92 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.46 346065 UNIT 535 - COVERS AND PADS UNIT 535 - COVERS AND PADS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,102.62 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 98.13 346368 FLEET INVENTORY - B KIT FLEET INVENTORY - B KIT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 136.12 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.11 348559 UNIT 38 - LATCHES AND SCREWS UNIT 38 - LATCHES AND SCREWS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 57.69 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.13 CM346065 FLEET - RETURNS COVERS & PA[ FLEET - RETURNS COVERS & PA[ 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -711.76 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -63.35 Total : 838.07 96771 6/7/2007 071687 BISBEE, JENNICA BISBEE07 CONTEST WINNER Page: 4 Packet Page 27 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96771 6/7/2007 071687 BISBEE, JENNICA (Continued) 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 25.00 Total : 25.00 96772 6/7/2007 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 070517COE WEB SITE MAINTENANCE Web Site Maintenance 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 164.50 Total : 164.50 96773 6/7/2007 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 197 Prof Services for DSD Bitco Prof Services for DSD Bitco 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 190.00 Total : 190.00 96774 6/7/2007 067519 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 813814 Misc Hardware to get fiber running Misc Hardware to get fiber running 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 624.39 Freight 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 57.63 Total : 682.02 96775 6/7/2007 071677 BOONIE PACKER 10307 INV#10307 EDMONDS PD REDI MAG II 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 94.95 Total : 94.95 96776 6/7/2007 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN8458 BIRDING CLASS BIRDS ARE AWESOME! CLASS #8 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 31.50 BIRD NATURALIST CLASSROOM V 001.000.640.574.350.410.00 218.40 Total : 249.90 96777 6/7/2007 071679 BURNS, SANDY 2518 TRAVEL/BURNS TRAVEL/BURNS 411.000.656.538.800.430.00 650.66 Page: 5 Packet Page 28 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96777 6/7/2007 071679 071679 BURNS, SANDY (Continued) Total : 650.66 96778 6/7/2007 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC FND4736 NAS Back up Appliance NAS Back up Appliance 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 6,603.44 Freight 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 58.50 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 592.90 Total : 7,254.84 96779 6/7/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY107526 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 27.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.48 RN05071034 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 15.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 1.38 Total : 47.18 96780 6/7/2007 063615 CH MURPHY CLARK-ULLMAN INC 705007CS C-248 C-248 CONTRACT LABOR 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 17,448.25 Freight 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 522.50 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,030.39 Total : 19,001.14 96781 6/7/2007 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT8102 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #8102 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 50.40 Total : 50.40 Page: 6 Packet Page 29 of 463 vchlist 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 7 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96782 6/7/2007 071621 CHINN, LOUIS F CHINN8392 ART CLASS ART FOR KIDZ #8392 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 204.75 Total : 204.75 96783 6/7/2007 065975 CHOIR OF THE SOUND CHOIR2007 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMEI 123.000.640.573.100.410.00 600.00 Total : 600.00 96784 6/7/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS X06072007 C/A 828698926 Services 5/28-6/27/07 425-418-8755 001.000.310.514.100.420.00 112.65 Total : 112.65 96785 6/7/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 87196442XO6052007 87196442 PLANT CELL PHONES 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 18.68 Total : 18.68 96786 6/7/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 871747052XO6052007 Bowman Cell Service 4/26 to 5/25/07 Bowman Cell Service 4/26 to 5/25/07 001.000.620.558.800.420.00 9.16 Total : 9.16 96787 6/7/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 3XO6052007 OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS Vehicles' wireless 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 94.78 Total : 94.78 96788 6/7/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460640672 UNIFORMS Page: 7 Packet Page 30 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96788 6/7/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 96789 6/7/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Stn 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.75 Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.74 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.62 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.61 460640694 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 460644880 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460644881 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.51 460645921 UNIFORMS Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 97.62 Stn 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 97.62 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.69 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.69 Total : 725.15 5337 MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER JUNE Page: 8 Packet Page 31 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96789 6/7/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD (Continued) MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER JUNE 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83 Total : 13,800.83 96790 6/7/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR MAY 07 WATER USEAGE FOR MAY 07 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 487.25 Total : 487.25 96791 6/7/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1792056 FAC - NO TOUCH ROLLED TOWEL FAC - NO TOUCH ROLLED TOWEL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 379.80 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.02 Total : 416.32 96792 6/7/2007 071680 CODE 4 LLC 07589 INV#07589 EDMONDS PD S&W M&P .40 - 15 ROUND MAGAZI 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 261.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 23.23 07589 INV#07589 EDMONDS PD EO TECH WEAPON SIGHT 510AA 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 330.00 SIGHT - ARMS #40L-SP 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 104.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 8.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.230.350.00 39.34 Total : 765.57 96793 6/7/2007 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 28385 Edmonds CDC for Jaime Page: 9 Packet Page 32 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96793 6/7/2007 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO (Continued) Edmonds CDC for Jaime 001.000.620.532.200.310.00 70.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.532.200.310.00 6.23 Total : 76.23 96794 6/7/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 1287 IT FOR MONTH OF APRIL 07 CDW - DVD Writers 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 285.68 CDW - Cables 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 50.09 Total : 335.77 96795 6/7/2007 069888 CONROY, LINDA CONROY8069 PINE NEEDLE BASKETRY PINE NEEDLE BASKETRY #8069 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 182.00 Total : 182.00 96796 6/7/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 1126518 INVOICE # 6728296 Page: 10 Packet Page 33 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96796 6/7/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 96797 6/7/2007 068815 CORRECT EQUIPMENT Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) pagers -water 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 11.85 pagers -streets 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 11.85 pagers -storm 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 15.80 pagers -facilities 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 23.70 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.49 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 0.85 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 1.45 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 0.97 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 1.62 Total : 69.58 8300 SEWER - AMGP GRINDER PUMP S SEWER - AMGP GRINDER PUMP S 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4,527.88 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 402.98 8302 SEWER - E1 8003 STATOR PUMPS SEWER - E1 8003 STATOR PUMPS 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 141.68 RETAINING RING CLIPS, CAPTIVE 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 13.32 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.16 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.17 Page: 11 Packet Page 34 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96797 6/7/2007 068815 068815 CORRECT EQUIPMENT (Continued) Total : 5,104.19 96798 6/7/2007 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM8240 IRISH DANCE CLASSES IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 100.80 IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #8241 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 268.80 IRISH DANCE 13+ #8243 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 100.80 IRISH DANCE 13+ #8244 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 201.60 IRISH DANCE 13+ #8245 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 67.20 IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #8528 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 22.40 Total : 761.60 96799 6/7/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 38409 UNIT EQ26FI - REM MTG KIT W/ C/ UNIT EQ26FI - REM MTG KIT W/ C/ 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 155.00 Freight 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 5.00 Sales Tax 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 14.24 Total : 174.24 96800 6/7/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY WP-134 LAB ACCREDITATION LAB ACCREDITATION 411.000.656.538.800.510.00 675.00 Total : 675.00 96801 6/7/2007 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2007030145 BILL NO 1136494 Page: 12 Packet Page 35 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96801 6/7/2007 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES (Continued) 330-00332 Photoshop CS 2 WIN AOO License l 001.000.410.521.210.490.00 973.72 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.490.00 77.90 2007030145 BILL NO 1136494 330-00331 Acrobat 8.0 Professional Windows UI 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 171.11 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 13.69 2007030145 BILL NO 1135962 330-00328 Viewsonic VG2021 m 20" LCD Monitc 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 514.84 2007030145 BILL NO 1136035 330-00332 Photoshop CS 2 CD - 23102095 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 19.14 Freight 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 4.15 2007030145 BILL NO 1135963 330-00330 Acrobat 8.0 CD 22002142 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 19.14 Freight 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 4.15 2007030145 CUSTOMER ID D200-0 03/07 Scan Services 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 329.02 2007040136 CUSTOMER ID D200-0 04/07 Scan Services 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 336.73 Total : 2,463.59 96802 6/7/2007 071676 DIAMOND PARKING CASE 03-0700 EVIDENCE RETURN FOR EPD CAS RETURN OF FUNDS TO OWNER 001.000.000.369.200.000.00 17.00 Total : 17.00 Page: 13 Packet Page 36 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96803 6/7/2007 068498 DIAMONDBACK FIRE & RESCUE INC 2348 OPS REPAIR MAINT AMKUS ext. hose & cap 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 392.37 Total : 392.37 96804 6/7/2007 061789 DIX, TERESA DIX8092 TENT CAMPING CLASS THE JOY OF TENT CAMPING- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 73.50 Total : 73.50 96805 6/7/2007 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL May 2007 LOBBYIST GENERAL GOVERNME� Lobbyist General Government & 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 1,385.00 Lobbyist Edmonds Crossing 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 1,200.00 Total : 2,585.00 96806 6/7/2007 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02287026 FS 3 - FACIAS, VENT CASINGS FS 3 - FACIAS, VENT CASINGS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 394.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.07 02287199 PS - SOLID CORE BIRCH DOOR PS - SOLID CORE BIRCH DOOR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 96.40 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.58 Total : 534.05 96807 6/7/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 81008 SUPPLIES GLOVES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.42 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.11 Page: 14 Packet Page 37 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96807 6/7/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS (Continued) 81303 SUPPLIES FUSES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.86 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.52 Total : 19.91 96808 6/7/2007 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E287765 Pre -employment testing services Pre -employment testing services 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 433.00 E288032 Pre -employment testing Pre -employment testing 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 89.00 E288034 Pre -employment testing Pre -employment testing 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 484.00 E288034-1 Pre -employment testing services Pre -employment testing services 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 72.00 Total : 1,078.00 96809 6/7/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 10766 BROWN & CALDWELL BROWN & CALDWELL 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 2.06 10779 UPS/CASCADE INDUSTRIES/LONG UPS/CASCADE INDUSTRIES/LONG 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 27.30 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 2.45 Total : 31.81 96810 6/7/2007 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP TRUNKHILL0601 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP:- 122.000.640.574.100.490.00 150.00 Total : 150.00 Page: 15 Packet Page 38 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96811 6/7/2007 008410 EDMONDS PRINTING CO R21009 WATER QUALITY - 16500 2007 ANI WATER QUALITY - 16500 2007 ANI 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2,611.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 232.38 Total : 2,843.38 96812 6/7/2007 068706 ERIKS WEST INC 21813646 Replaces lost ck 93625 issued 1/18/o Replaces lost ck 93625 issued 1/18/C 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 208.99 Total : 208.99 96813 6/7/2007 071634 ESCHELON TELCOM INC 010495174 C/A 010495174 PR1-2 City Phone Lines 5/26-6/25/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 874.04 Total : 874.04 96814 6/7/2007 071690 EWING, LILLI EWING0525 REFUND REFUND/INSTRUCTOR LEAVING 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 120.00 Total : 120.00 96815 6/7/2007 070580 FOSTER, KANNON KANON0525 REFUND CLASS REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 196.00 Total : 196.00 96816 6/7/2007 066670 FRONTIER FORD 2167 UNIT EQ11EQ- 2008 FORD ESCAPE UNIT EQ11EQ- 2008 FORD ESCAPE 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 15,396.22 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1,277.89 2167 Prompt pmt discount Prompt pmt discount 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 -100.00 Total : 16,574.11 Page: 16 Packet Page 39 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96817 6/7/2007 061589 GALLS INC 5888127900010 UNIT EQ26FI - ELECT SIREN W/SC UNIT EQ26FI - ELECT SIREN W/SC 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 169.99 Freight 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 18.99 Sales Tax 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 16.82 Total : 205.80 96818 6/7/2007 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 078549 UNIT 488 - TIRES UNIT 488 - TIRES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 599.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 53.36 078551 FLEET INVENTORY - TIRES FLEET INVENTORY - TIRES 511.000.657.548.680.340.30 285.72 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.30 25.43 078868 UNIT 88 - TIRES UNIT 88 - TIRES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 299.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 26.65 078994 UNIT 372 - TIRES UNIT 372 - TIRES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 123.06 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.95 Total : 1,424.17 96819 6/7/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9374210939 SUPPLIES S HOOKS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.22 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.33 Page: 17 Packet Page 40 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96819 6/7/2007 012199 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) Total : 28.55 96820 6/7/2007 069864 GRAPHIC ENTERPRISES INC AR134549 Contract/base charge K & E 8036 Blc Contract/base charge K & E 8036 Blc 001.000.620.524.100.480.00 103.95 Total : 103.95 96821 6/7/2007 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 147047 UNIT 100 - BRAKE PAD KIT, AIR CL UNIT 100 - BRAKE PAD KIT, AIR CL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 132.36 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.79 200701594 UNIT 100 -TIRE UNIT 100 -TIRE 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 154.46 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 13.76 Total : 312.37 96822 6/7/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 12104063 YOST POOL SUPPLIES FLANGES, PVC PIPE, COUPLINGS, 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 294.10 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.18 Total : 320.28 96823 6/7/2007 071682 HOLSTEIN, DANIELLE HOLSTEIN07 CONTEST WINNER 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 96824 6/7/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3593024 6035 3225 0267 0205 NUTS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.96 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.07 Page: 18 Packet Page 41 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96824 6/7/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 4031393 6035 3225 0267 0205 UTILITY LIGHTER, GASSER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.34 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.88 4031454 6035 3225 0267 0205 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.96 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.96 5033029 6035 3225 0267 0205 BATTERY, SCREWS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 49.84 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.44 5582812 6035 3225 0267 0205 NOZZLES, BLADES, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 53.29 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.75 6040196 6035 3225 0267 0205 GASSER, NOZZLE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 99.82 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.89 7080202 6035 3225 0267 0205 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.96 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.17 8581154 6035 3225 0267 0205 PVC UNIONS, PRIMER, CEMENT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.78 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.39 Page: 19 Packet Page 42 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96824 6/7/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9032269 6035 3225 0267 0205 GASSER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.85 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.55 9033465 6035 3225 0267 0205 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.60 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.13 9088822 6035 3225 0267 0205 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.82 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.24 Total : 396.69 96825 6/7/2007 070801 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 16087108 STREET - BTU TORCH STREET - BTU TORCH 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 169.99 Total : 169.99 96826 6/7/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS O49159 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES Stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 283.94 Total : 283.94 96827 6/7/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17714 ESJA.Mtl Tstng thru 05/26/07 ESJA.Mtl Tstng thru 05/26/07 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 1,731.83 17763 E7FE.Dsn Srvcs thru 05/26/07 E7FE.Dsn Srvcs thru 05/26/07 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 65.00 Total : 1,796.83 Page: 20 Packet Page 43 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96828 6/7/2007 071380 ICHIMURA-HAYASHI, ITSUKO HAYASH18399 JAPANESE LANGUAGE CLASSES JAPANESE FOR KIDS #8399 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 109.20 Total : 109.20 96829 6/7/2007 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP S/P 3097081 CUSTOMER # S114983 5/2007 Web Server Hosting for Interr 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 69.90 S/P3017776 CUSTOMER # S114983 4/2007 Web Server Hosting for Interr 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 69.90 Total : 139.80 96830 6/7/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73357452 COPIER LEASE PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEA 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 25.50 Total : 25.50 96831 6/7/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73357449 FINANCE COPIER RENTAL 5/22-6/2 Finance Copier Rental 5/22-6/21/07 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07 Meter Charges 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 244.21 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 62.16 Total : 760.44 96832 6/7/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73357444 Lease/copies Canon Copier C2221 Lease/copies Canon Copier C2221 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 105.32 73357447 Lease/copies Canon Copier C8500 Lease/copies Canon Copier C8500 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,201.66 73357448 Lease/copies Eng Canon CC32Z Lease/copies Eng Canon CC32Z 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,021.85 Page: 21 Packet Page 44 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96832 6/7/2007 070042 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) Total : 2,328.83 96833 6/7/2007 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 2609772 PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS INTERNET ACCESS FOR MEADOW 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00 Total : 15.00 96834 6/7/2007 061844 INTL CONF OF POLICE CHAPLAINS 21976 INV#21976 EDMONDS PD - GAYDO MEMBERSHIP - KENNETH GAYDO; 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 96835 6/7/2007 071689 JOHNSON, MICHAEL MJOHNSON07 CONTEST WINNER 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 96836 6/7/2007 015270 JONES CHEMICALS INC 347409 HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,010.14 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 264.89 Total : 3,275.03 96837 6/7/2007 071684 JUDD, GABE JUDD07 CONTEST WINNER 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 25.00 Total : 25.00 96838 6/7/2007 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 5007-630 MOWER EQUIPMENT AIR FILTERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.25 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.16 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.84 Page: 22 Packet Page 45 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96838 6/7/2007 068711 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY (Continued) Total : 10.25 96839 6/7/2007 071401 MALMSTEN, KATHERINE MALMSTEN7835 CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES SEQUENTIAL CLASS #7835 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 800.80 Total : 800.80 96840 6/7/2007 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 43559 YOST POOL SUPPLIES RAINBOW LEAF CANISTER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 80.96 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.21 43758 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL- 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 319.00 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 47.39 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.61 43903 YOST POOL SUPPLIES BIOGUARD, ACID REAGENT, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 154.52 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.75 43976 YOST POOL SUPPLIES CONTROL ASSEMBLY 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 144.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.82 Total : 812.26 96841 6/7/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 65492396 123106800 EPDXY STEE PASTE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 45.60 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.05 Page: 23 Packet Page 46 of 463 vchlist 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 24 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96841 6/7/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO (Continued) 65897310 123106800 HOSE COUPLING/GLASS DISC 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 428.19 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.96 Total : 488.80 96842 6/7/2007 071686 NELSON, DAVID NELSON07 CONTEST WINNER 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 96843 6/7/2007 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB8323 MINI ME FUN FACTORY MINI ME FUN FACTORY #8323 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 375.00 NEWCOMB8324 FUN FACTORY FUN FACTORY #8324 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 756.00 Total : 1,131.00 96844 6/7/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 323912314-066 C/A 323912314 It phone service 4/25-5/24/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 138.68 Total : 138.68 96845 6/7/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 411191318066 Building Cell Service Building Cell Service 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 112.92 Total : 112.92 96846 6/7/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 976032312-066 COMMUNICATIONS Page: 24 Packet Page 47 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96846 6/7/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Admin 001.000.510.522.100.420.00 31.22 Operations 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 315.89 Prevention 001.000.510.522.300.420.00 75.78 ALS 001.000.510.526.100.420.00 52.56 Total : 475.45 96847 6/7/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1518635.001 2091 CGB FITTING 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 24.09 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.07 Total : 26.16 96848 6/7/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 11164859 Printing of Econ. Dev. Director job Printing of Econ. Dev. Director job 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 80.00 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 7.12 Total : 87.12 96849 6/7/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 000907 520437 ERASER/LABELS/PENCILS 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 48.60 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 4.23 Total : 52.83 96850 6/7/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 000867 Office Supplies - DSD Office Supplies - DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 278.33 Page: 25 Packet Page 48 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96850 6/7/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) 877645 Office Supplies DSD Office Supplies DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 308.08 Total : 586.41 96851 6/7/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 878412 INV#878412 ACCT#520437 250POL BUBBLE WRAP & MAILERS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 85.75 PRINTER INK FOR TRAFFIC UNIT 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 123.19 LASER POINTER 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 51.79 PRINTER CARTRIDGE FOR PATRC 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 180.07 BLUE AND BLACK PENS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 114.76 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 18.59 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 4.61 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.03 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.21 Total : 605.00 96852 6/7/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 WATER/SEWER 23700 104TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 193.30 Total : 193.30 96853 6/7/2007 070181 PACIFIC SIGNAL SUPPLY LLC 2551 STREET - REPAIR CHARGES FOR Page: 26 Packet Page 49 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96853 6/7/2007 070181 PACIFIC SIGNAL SUPPLY LLC (Continued) STREET - REPAIR CHARGES FOR 111.000.653.542.640.480.00 379.78 Freight 111.000.653.542.640.480.00 13.08 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.480.00 33.40 Total : 426.26 96854 6/7/2007 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 46021 STORM DUMP FEES STORM DUMP FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 113.78 Total : 113.78 96855 6/7/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9657270 COPIER CONTRACT COPIER CONTRACT 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 12.60 Total : 157.82 96856 6/7/2007 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC. 556908 YOST PARK - PAINT SUPPLIES YOST PARK - PAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 78.20 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.96 Total : 85.16 96857 6/7/2007 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK8070 CHILDREN'S CLASSES WIGGLES & GIGGLES #8070 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 179.20 PECK8157 PILATES CLASSES PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT #81: 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 532.00 PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT #81: 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 772.80 Page: 27 Packet Page 50 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96857 6/7/2007 069944 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH 96858 6/7/2007 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS Invoice (Continued) 05/01-05/31 /07 PO # Description/Account Total : PW- MILEAGE FOR WCIA CONF - - Amount 1,484.00 Page: 28 Packet Page 51 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96858 6/7/2007 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) PW- MILEAGE FOR WCIA CONF - - 001.000.650.519.910.430.00 6.40 PW- CAKE FOR PW CITIES PICNIC 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 62.49 PW - APWA 2007 PW WEEK LUNCI 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 35.00 FAC MAINT - CONTAINERS FOR FE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.94 FAC MAINT - MAR 07 CLASS MILEF 001.000.651.519.920.430.00 31.04 FAC MAINT - APR 07 CLASS MILEA 001.000.651.519.920.430.00 15.52 PW - FOOD -FIRSTAID CPR TRAINI 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 4.50 PW - FOOD -FIRSTAID CPR TRAINI 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 4.50 PW - FOOD -FIRSTAID CPR TRAINI 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.50 PW - FOOD -FIRSTAID CPR TRAINI 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.50 PW- FOOD- FIRSTAID CPR TRAINII 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 6.73 PW- FOOD- FIRSTAID CPR TRAINII 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 6.73 PW- FOOD- FIRSTAID CPR TRAINII 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.73 PW- FOOD- FIRSTAID CPR TRAINII 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.71 WATER - VINEGAR FOR WATER Q 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 32.90 RECYCLE- APRIL 07 MILEAGE - S I 411.000.654.537.900.430.00 10.67 SEWER - SOD FOR SEWER LAWN 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 35.82 Page: 29 Packet Page 52 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96858 6/7/2007 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS (Continued) SEWER - PVC PLUGS FOR SEWEF 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.97 UNIT 97 - LIC FEES - D SITTAUER 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 32.75 FLEET - POSTAGE FOR D.O.E PAP 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.29 Total : 323.69 96859 6/7/2007 028400 PITNEY BOWES 488281 6/1/07-5/31/08 Maint Agreement Folc 6/1/07-5/31/08 Maint Agreement Folc 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 915.00 6/1/07-5/31/08 Maint Agreement Folc 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 915.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 81.44 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 81.43 Total : 1,992.87 96860 6/7/2007 026695 PNBOA 366-2930 BASKETBALL OFFICIATING BASKETBALL OFFICIATING- 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 2,420.50 Total : 2,420.50 96861 6/7/2007 069198 PNCWA WESTERN WA REGION 2397 RANDY PALADA TRAINING/PALADA 411.000.656.538.800.490.71 145.00 Total : 145.00 96862 6/7/2007 070257 POSTINI INC 313118 INTERNET ANTI -VIRUS & SPAM MA 05/07 Internet Anti -Virus & Spam Ma 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 475.83 Total : 475.83 96863 6/7/2007 071667 PRYDE DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC Recpt # 44305 Refund for STF20060016 Page: 30 Packet Page 53 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96863 6/7/2007 071667 PRYDE DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC (Continued) Refund for STF20060016 001.000.000.345.830.000.00 180.00 Total : 180.00 96864 6/7/2007 071688 PRYDE, KELLY PRYDE07 CONTEST WINNER 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 96865 6/7/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 529.85 Total : 529.85 96866 6/7/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY 411.000.656.538.800.472.63 1,131.32 Total : 1,131.32 96867 6/7/2007 071678 PUGET SOUND OTOLARYNGOLOGY 5307 HEARING TEST - FAC MAINT HEARING TEST - FAC MAINT 001.000.651.519.920.410.00 39.00 Total : 39.00 96868 6/7/2007 065579 QUIKSIGN 55543 Sign Install ADB 07-12 Smith Dev. Sign Install ADB 07-12 Smith Dev. 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.88 55565 Sign install S-07-13 Murray Sign install S-07-13 Murray 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.88 55566 Sign Install S 06-141 Arnhold Sign Install S 06-141 Arnhold 001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.88 Total : 509.64 96869 6/7/2007 071685 QUISENBERRY, CARISSA QUISENBERRY07 CONTEST WINNER Page: 31 Packet Page 54 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96869 6/7/2007 071685 QUISENBERRY, CARISSA (Continued) 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 96870 6/7/2007 066948 RAY ALLEN MFG CO INC 222213 INV#222213 EDMONDS PD STANDARD MUZZLES 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 103.90 Freight 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 10.00 Total : 113.90 96871 6/7/2007 031600 RELIABLE FLOOR COVERINGS 107667 PW - CARPET FOR OFFICE AREA PW - CARPET FOR OFFICE AREA 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 575.58 PW - CARPET FOR OFFICE AREA 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 1,295.06 PW - CARPET FOR OFFICE AREA 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 1,295.06 PW - CARPET FOR OFFICE AREA 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 1,295.06 PW - CARPET FOR OFFICE AREA 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 1,295.04 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 51.23 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 115.26 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 115.26 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 115.26 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 115.26 Total : 6,268.07 96872 6/7/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412968198 STREET - ASPHALT Page: 32 Packet Page 55 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96872 6/7/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS (Continued) STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 240.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 21.36 Total : 261.36 96873 6/7/2007 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 578652 INV#578652 CUST#0001733 EDMOI FEDERAL TACTICAL 12 GA AMMO 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 260.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 23.14 Total : 283.14 96874 6/7/2007 071683 SASSEEN, RHIAN SASSEEN07 CONTEST WINNER 2007 YOUTH WRITING CONTEST- 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 96875 6/7/2007 067003 SCHOETTLE, GEORGE 051507 CPR TRAINING - SEWER CPR TRAINING - SEWER 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 210.00 WATER - 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 300.00 STORM- 411.000.652.542.900.430.00 210.00 STREET- 111.000.653.542.900.430.00 240.00 WWTP- 411.000.656.538.800.490.71 30.00 PARKS- 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 270.00 FAC MAINT- 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 180.00 FLEET- 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 120.00 Page: 33 Packet Page 56 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 96875 6/7/2007 067003 067003 SCHOETTLE, GEORGE (Continued) 96876 6/7/2007 061482 SEA -WESTERN INC 116130 96877 6/7/2007 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 1071183 Description/Account Amount Total : 1,560.00 OPS REPAIR/MAINT breathing apparatus 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 127.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 11.37 Total : 139.12 PW - 1000 PO'S Page: 34 Packet Page 57 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96877 6/7/2007 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) PW - 1000 PO'S 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 8.50 PW - 1000 PO'S 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.94 PW - 1000 PO'S 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 26.94 PW - 1000 PO'S 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 26.94 PW - 1000 PO'S 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 26.94 PW - 1000 PO'S 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 26.94 PW - 1000 PO'S 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 26.86 COMPOSING PO'S 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 4.75 COMPOSING PO'S 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.05 COMPOSING PO'S 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.05 COMPOSING PO'S 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.05 COMPOSING PO'S 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 15.05 COMPOSING PO'S 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 15.05 COMPOSING PO'S 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.00 Freight 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 0.67 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.13 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.13 Page: 35 Packet Page 58 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96877 6/7/2007 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 96878 6/7/2007 069734 SMITH, JOEL 96879 6/7/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.13 Freight 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 2.13 Freight 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 2.13 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.12 King County Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.24 King County Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.93 King County Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.93 King County Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.93 King County Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 3.93 King County Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 3.93 King County Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.90 Total : 303.29 JSMITH0515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPRING GYMNASTICS SHOW:- 001.000.640.575.550.410.00 180.00 Total : 180.00 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL IRRIGATION CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 28.28 3850013073 IRRIGATION CONTROL IRRIGATION CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 27.79 Page: 36 Packet Page 59 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96879 6/7/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 3890014081 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 175.67 5040011628 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 181.57 5070014260 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 28.28 Total : 441.59 96880 6/7/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 611013602 463-001-867-1 9805 EDMONDS WAY/WESTGATE 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 26.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.57 Total : 27.79 96881 6/7/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC June-2007 06/07 RECREATION SERVIES CON 06/07 Recreation Servies Contract FE 001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67 Total : 4,791.67 96882 6/7/2007 071655 SOFTWARE HOUSE INT'L INC 97A31 SYMANTEC ANTI -VIRUS RENEWAL 310-00071 Renewal Exp Savice 10.2 Dtsvr-Bas 1 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 3,495.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 307.56 97A5A SURFCONTROL LICENSE RENEW{ 310-00070 Web Filter Subscription 1Y SWF ISA 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 3,442.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 302.90 Page: 37 Packet Page 60 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96882 6/7/2007 071655 SOFTWARE HOUSE INT'L INC (Continued) 97A5E SYMANTEC GHOST ENTERPRISE 310-00072 Symantec Ghosst Solution Suite SYN 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 95.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 8.36 Total : 7,650.82 96883 6/7/2007 038413 SOUND TRACTOR IN62000 MOWER SUPPLIES MOWER PARTS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 200.10 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.73 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.62 Total : 222.45 96884 6/7/2007 070677 SPRINT Eng.May 2007 Engineering Nextel thru 05/24/07 Engineering Nextel thru 05/24/07 001.000.620.532.200.420.00 541.62 Total : 541.62 96885 6/7/2007 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 68189 E7CA.Jim Roberts thru 05/26/07 E7CA.Jim Roberts thru 05/26/07 125.100.620.595.300.650.00 195.00 Total : 195.00 96886 6/7/2007 061782 STATE TREASURER 3120000930010005 FLEET - UNDERGROUND STORAG FLEET - UNDERGROUND STORAG 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 309.00 3120000930010006 FLEET - UNDERGROUND STORAG FLEET - UNDERGROUND STORAG 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 109.00 Total : 418.00 96887 6/7/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 037187 FAC - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES Page: 38 Packet Page 61 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96887 6/7/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY (Continued) FAC - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 151.60 FS 16 - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 87.84 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.31 Total : 260.75 96888 6/7/2007 065133 SUDDEN PRINTING 16907 ADMIN PROF SERVICES M16 Comm. programs 001.000.510.522.100.410.00 81.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.410.00 7.21 Total : 88.21 96889 6/7/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18801921 STREET - STEEL HEX CAP SCREW STREET - STEEL HEX CAP SCREW 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 25.71 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 2.29 Total : 28.00 96890 6/7/2007 071577 TAYLOR, KATHLEEN 5/2-6/4/07 CONSULTANT SERVICES 5/2/-5/14i CONSULTANT SERVICES 5/2/-5/14i 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 6,500.00 Total : 6,500.00 96891 6/7/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1507426 NEWSPAPER AD Ordinance 3646 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 25.92 Total : 25.92 96892 6/7/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1500460 Legal Advertising CU-07-9 Legal Advertising CU-07-9 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 27.36 Page: 39 Packet Page 62 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96892 6/7/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY (Continued) 1501507 Legal Advertising ADB -07-12 Steve! Legal Advertising ADB -07-12 Steve! 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 19.44 1502179 R-07-15 Michel R-07-15 Michel 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 25.20 1504165 Legal Advertising S-07-13 Murray Legal Advertising S-07-13 Murray 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 15.12 1504166 Legal Advertising - S-06-141 Arnhold Legal Advertising - S-06-141 Arnhold 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 19.44 Total : 106.56 96893 6/7/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 741293 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAIN SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAIN 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 104.00 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 9.26 741294 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MON SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MON 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.57 Total : 123.83 96894 6/7/2007 040924 TMG SERVICES INC 0027207-1N 2462 BOOSTER PROBE 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 293.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 15.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 27.10 Total : 335.10 96895 6/7/2007 071681 TSUTAKAWA, GERARD TSUTAKAWA0515 ARTWORK CLEANING Page: 40 Packet Page 63 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96895 6/7/2007 071681 TSUTAKAWA, GERARD (Continued) BRONZE FLOUNDER SCULPTURE 117.200.640.575.500.410.00 150.00 Sales Tax 117.200.640.575.500.410.00 13.35 Total : 163.35 96896 6/7/2007 065934 TUNE TALES TUNETALES7687 MUSIC CLASSES PAYMENT 2 OF 2:- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,407.30 Total : 2,407.30 96897 6/7/2007 071691 TUPPER, FINIS GERALD Settlement Settlement Settlement 001.000.620.558.800.490.00 800.00 Total : 800.00 96898 6/7/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425.775.2525 CITY HALL DIRECTORY LISTING City Hall Directory Listing 5/7-6/7/07 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 3.58 425-AB8-1176 CITY PARK T1 LINE City Park T1 Line 4/16-6/16/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 815.14 425-AB8-2844 POLICE T1 LINE Police T1 Line 5/10-6/10/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 374.01 425-DHO-0667 DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOC Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom 5, 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 350.92 425-NW2-0887 Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 285.00 Total : 1,828.65 96899 6/7/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 NW1-0060 BPS TELEMETRY Page: 41 Packet Page 64 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96899 6/7/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) BPS TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.12 425 NW1-0155 TELEMENTRY TELEMENTRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 216.25 425-771-5553 03 02101014522641 07 AUTO DIALER 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 54.50 Total : 311.87 96900 6/7/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE FS #16-FAX LINE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.59 425-778-2153 FS #20 PHONE SERVICE FS #20 PHONE SERVICE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 47.40 425-FLO-0017 FS #16 FRAME RELAY FS #16 FRAME RELAY 001.000.510.528.600.420.00 354.94 Total : 452.93 96901 6/7/2007 068265 VERIZON ONLINE 31898898 ACCT #8372119 City of Edmonds Internet May-2007 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 667.00 Total : 667.00 96902 6/7/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 764466185-00001 CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 2.97 Total : 2.97 96903 6/7/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0554976289 Bldg Air Card 4/18-5/17/07 Bldg Air Card 4/18-5/17/07 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 60.03 Total : 60.03 Page: 42 Packet Page 65 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96904 6/7/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0556878791 INV#0556878791 ACCT#470497482- CELL PHONES 4/24-5/23/07 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 123.55 Total : 123.55 96905 6/7/2007 067282 VERNON PUBLICATION LLC IB00323 SHIPPING FOR SEATTLE INFO GU Shipping for 30 Seattle Info Guide 20 001.000.610.519.700.490.00 30.00 Total : 30.00 96906 6/7/2007 067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO 35061 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB -ANNUAL TE: BOYS & GIRLS CLUB -ANNUAL TE: 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 174.14 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 15.50 35063 FS 17 - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPEC FS 17 - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPEC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 196.28 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 17.47 35064 FS 20 - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPEC FS 20 - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPEC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 247.28 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 22.01 35065 FAC - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT FAC - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 298.28 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 26.55 35066 PW FLEET - ANNUAL TEST AND IN PW FLEET - ANNUAL TEST AND IN 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 342.55 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 30.49 Page: 43 Packet Page 66 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96906 6/7/2007 067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO 96907 6/7/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 35067 PW - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT PW - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 39.36 PW - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 88.55 PW - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 88.55 PW - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 88.55 PW - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPECT 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 88.54 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 3.50 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 7.88 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 7.88 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 7.88 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 7.89 35069 FS 16 - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPEC FS 16 - ANNUAL TEST AND INSPEC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 305.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 27.15 35070 SR CENTER - ANNUAL TEST AND I SR CENTER - ANNUAL TEST AND 1 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 386.83 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 34.43 Total : 2,552.54 30406245 1066294 Page: 44 Packet Page 67 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96907 6/7/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC (Continued) GLOVES/PIPET/PAPER GLASS 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 573.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 54.44 Total : 627.66 96908 6/7/2007 069582 WAGNER CONSTRUCTION 5907 LOG CABIN - WASH/STAIN OUTSIE LOG CABIN - WASH/STAIN OUTSIE 120.000.310.575.420.410.50 2,755.25 LOG CABIN - WASH/STAIN OUTSIE 116.000.651.519.920.480.00 565.75 Sales Tax 120.000.310.575.420.410.50 244.75 Sales Tax 116.000.651.519.920.480.00 50.25 Total : 3,616.00 96909 6/7/2007 045912 WASPC DUES001098000 INV#DUES001098000 EDMONDS PI MAY ASSOCIATE DUES - GANNON 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 96910 6/7/2007 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 0750178-2677-9 202-0001256-2677-0 ASH DISPOSAL 411.000.656.538.800.474.65 3,259.66 Total : 3,259.66 96911 6/7/2007 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 813735675 CODE UPDATES RCW updates 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 712.50 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 63.40 Total : 775.90 160 Vouchers for bank code : front Bank total : 342,282.42 Page: 45 Packet Page 68 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 46 06/07/2007 12:54:48PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 160 Vouchers in this report Invoice PO # Description/Account Total vouchers Amount 342,282.42 Page: 46 Packet Page 69 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96912 6/14/2007 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 52207 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 1,097.00 Total : 1,097.00 96913 6/14/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 241212 RODENT CONTROL CITY WIDE RODENT CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 92.56 Total : 92.56 96914 6/14/2007 071692 ACE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 768108 4257710237 BRUSH/RATCHET STRAP/HAMMEF 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 170.44 Total : 170.44 96915 6/14/2007 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND JULY 2007 KENNELING SERVICES - JULY 200 KENNELING/JULY 2007 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 1,856.26 Total : 1,856.26 96916 6/14/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8262 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CI MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CI 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 109,684.22 Total : 109,684.22 96917 6/14/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 483280 UNIT 18 - BATTERY UNIT 18 - BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 95.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.54 709008 SHOP - FUSES, LAMPS, OIL ABSOI SHOP - FUSES, LAMPS, OIL ABSOI 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 157.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.04 Page: 1 Packet Page 70 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96917 6/14/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 96918 6/14/2007 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 709094 SHOP - FUSE TAP, CIRCUIT TAP SHOP - FUSE TAP, CIRCUIT TAP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 162.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.42 Total : 452.70 197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 84.34 197-0800897 0197-000845723 Public Works Facility 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.69 Public Works Facility 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 78.62 Public Works Facility 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 78.62 Public Works Facility 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 78.62 Public Works Facility 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 78.62 Public Works Facility 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 78.63 197-0801132 0197-000845794 garbage for F/S #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 94.02 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 7.49 197-0829729 0197-000846526 garbage for MCC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 47.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 5.11 Total : 652.26 Page: 2 Packet Page 71 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96919 6/14/2007 001057 ALMY, DON ALMY0612 VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SUPERVISI( VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SUPERVISI( 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 792.00 Total : 792.00 96920 6/14/2007 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 6794 PLAQUE PLAQUE FOR VIEWING SCOPE @ 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 170.80 Freight 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 5.90 Sales Tax 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 15.73 Total : 192.43 96921 6/14/2007 070161 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 3607 Economic Dev. Director, #07-24 Economic Dev. Director, #07-24 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00 Total : 25.00 96922 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3893736 LAUNDRY SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.36 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.70 Total : 33.06 96923 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3893738 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 85.06 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.57 Total : 92.63 96924 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3887729 FLEET UNIFORM SVC Page: 3 Packet Page 72 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96924 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 512-3887730 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Page: 4 Packet Page 73 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96924 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3887731 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3889031 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 512-3892356 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55 Page: 5 Packet Page 74 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96924 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3892357 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 WATER UNIFORM SVC 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 8.00 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 0.70 Page: 6 Packet Page 75 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96924 6/14/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) 512-3892358 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3893737 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00 Total : 202.94 96925 6/14/2007 071668 ARCADIS US INC ACADIS REFUND ON RECEIPT #43685, BLC REFUND ON RECEIPT #43685, BLC 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 2,455.00 Total : 2,455.00 96926 6/14/2007 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM PARKS FAX MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.26 Total : 42.26 96927 6/14/2007 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC 146982 PARKS - 12 WAY KEYS PARKS - 12 WAY KEYS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 64.26 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.72 Total : 69.98 96928 6/14/2007 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 74320 UNIT M16 - FIRE LOGOS Page: 7 Packet Page 76 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96928 6/14/2007 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS (Continued) UNIT M16 - FIRE LOGOS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 50.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.45 Total : 54.45 96929 6/14/2007 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 06-3981 BURIAL SUPPLIES 06-3981 BURIAL SUPPLIES: SEAVE 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 06-4078 BURIAL SUPPLIES:- 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 06-4198 BURIAL SUPPLIES: VOIT 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 06-4371 BURIAL SUPPLIES: JAKOE 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00 Total : 1,432.00 96930 6/14/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9657273 Canon 5870 Copier - 7/1 - 7/31/07 Page: 8 Packet Page 77 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96930 6/14/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING (Continued) Canon 5870 Copier - 7/1 - 7/31/07 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35 Canon 5870 Copier - 7/1 - 7/31/07 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33 Supply charge 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01 Supply charge 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00 Supply charge 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.25 Canon 5870 Copier - 7/1 - 7/31/07 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32 Total : 412.75 96931 6/14/2007 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 4667 Gymnastics/Youth Fitness Instructor, Gymnastics/Youth Fitness Instructor, 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 26.92 Total : 26.92 96932 6/14/2007 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 4671 CEMETERY AD CLASSIFIED AD FOR CEMETERY S 130.000.640.536.200.440.00 65.00 Total : 65.00 96933 6/14/2007 070110 BEAR, MICHELLE BEAR0507 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR l 001.000.640.574.350.430.00 57.72 Total : 57.72 Page: 9 Packet Page 78 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96934 6/14/2007 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS 848 ESGA.Services thru 05/18/07 ESGA.Services thru 05/18/07 412.300.630.594.320.650.00 3,612.47 Total : 3,612.47 96935 6/14/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 576653-02 INV#576653-02 EDMONDS PD - TOI PAIR OF EP LETTERS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.42 580084-01 INV#580084-01 EDMONDS PD - JEF SET OF GOLD EP LETTERS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.42 586351-80 CREDIT MEMO 586351-80 GG CREDIT FOR SERVICE BARS BILLE 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -13.65 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -1.21 586459 INV#586459 EDMONDS PD - MACH, Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.35 SERVICE BARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.90 590781 INV#590781 EDMONDS PD - BARD ULTIMATE CROSSTRAINER SHOE; 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 124.95 SERVICE BARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.85 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 11.64 Page: 10 Packet Page 79 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96935 6/14/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 591612 INV#591612 EDMONDS PD - FRAU; UNIFORM TROUSERS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 320.85 SHORT SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRTS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 119.90 LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.95 SERVICE BAR 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.65 BLACK DUTY BELT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 47.82 591612-80 CREDIT MEMO 591612-80 - FRAUS RETURN TWO PAIRS TROUSERS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -213.90 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -19.04 591733 INV#591733 EDMONDS PD - FRAU; NAMETAG 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 18.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.60 595468 INV#595468 EDMONDS PD - DAMIA ABA XT3A BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 649.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 57.85 595469 INV#595469 EDMONDS PD - RICHA ABA XT3A-2 BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 649.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 57.85 Page: 11 Packet Page 80 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96935 6/14/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 96936 6/14/2007 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 595473 INV#595473 EDMONDS PD - COMP ELBOW GUARD 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 15.95 KNEE GUARD 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 18.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.11 Total : 1,991.96 IE03383 UNIT 91 - BOLT PLOW, LIP, NUTS, UNIT 91 - BOLT PLOW, LIP, NUTS, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 229.45 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 25.80 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 70.53 IE03396 UNIT 18 - SEALS, GASKETS, FUEL UNIT 18 - SEALS, GASKETS, FUEL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 206.89 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.79 IE03550 UNIT 91 - SWITCHES Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.58 UNIT 91 - SWITCHES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 137.38 IL08032 UNIT 91 - BEARINGS, CUTTERS, B� UNIT 91 - BEARINGS, CUTTERS, B, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,136.15 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 95.44 Page: 12 Packet Page 81 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96936 6/14/2007 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC (Continued) IL08032A UNIT 91 - 3/4 X4 BOLTS UNIT 91 - 3/4 X4 BOLTS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 225.68 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.06 IL08149 UNIT 91 - HEAT EXCHANGE UNIT 91 - HEAT EXCHANGE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,085.52 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 92.07 IL08338 UNIT 91 - RETURNED BLADES UNIT 91 - RETURNED BLADES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -355.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -29.86 Total : 3,015.42 96937 6/14/2007 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN8424 BACKYARD BIRD CLASS BACKYARD BIRDS #8424 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 69.30 Total : 69.30 96938 6/14/2007 071510 BUCK, ALICIA BUCK8390 KIDZ ART ART FOR KIDZ #8390 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 245.00 ART FOR KIDZ #8391 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 280.00 Total : 525.00 96939 6/14/2007 069437 CANOPY WORLD INC E 006585 UNIT EQ09FI - CANOPY Page: 13 Packet Page 82 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96939 6/14/2007 069437 CANOPY WORLD INC (Continued) UNIT EQ09FI - CANOPY 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 1,339.00 Sales Tax 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 119.17 Total : 1,458.17 96940 6/14/2007 065142 CASCADE WEAR LTD 18306 INV#18306 EDMONDS PD - FALK MOTO/TRAFFIC GORETEX JACKET 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 259.00 MOTO/TRAFFIC GORETEX PANTS 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 183.00 BROKERAGE FEE AND SHIPPING 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 57.00 18323 INV#18323 EDMONDS PD - STACIE PATROL GORETEX JACKET 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 267.00 PATROL POLARTECH JACKET 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 106.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 11.58 Total : 883.58 96941 6/14/2007 067446 CEM CORPORATION 292231 DRYING PADS DRYING PADS 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 604.80 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 36.82 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 53.83 Total : 695.45 96942 6/14/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN05071035 HELIUM Page: 14 Packet Page 83 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96942 6/14/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BIRTHI 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.69 Total : 8.44 96943 6/14/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN05071037 2954000 ARGON/N ITROG EN/OXYGEN 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 31.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.76 Total : 33.76 96944 6/14/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY107702 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 48.07 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.47 LY107703 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 48.07 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.47 LY107704 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 9.61 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.05 Page: 15 Packet Page 84 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96944 6/14/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) LY107791 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 27.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.48 Total : 189.54 96945 6/14/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 107418 WATER - CARBON DIOXIDE SUPPI WATER - CARBON DIOXIDE SUPPI 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 57.20 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.09 RN05071036 SEWER - CYLINDER RENTAL SEWER - CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 0.69 Total : 70.73 96946 6/14/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 4254185733-9649 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4/26-5/25/1 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4/26-5/25/1 001.000.620.558.600.420.00 18.32 Total : 18.32 96947 6/14/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460645946 OPERATIONS UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 460650052 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 Page: 16 Packet Page 85 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96947 6/14/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION (Continued) 460650053 OPERATIONS UNIFORMS Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 98.13 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.74 Total : 292.35 96948 6/14/2007 063902 CITY OF EVERETT LAVELY SURVIVAL SPANISH/OFFICER D. L, REG ISTRATION/D. LAVELY- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 150.00 LEE SURVIVAL SPANISH/OFFICER LEE• REGISTRATION/JUSTIN LEE- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 150.00 Total : 300.00 96949 6/14/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD Reimb Lawless Reimb for overpmt of our Inv RGG 7( Reimb for overpmt of our Inv RGG 7( 104.000.000.338.210.000.00 1,277.14 Total : 1,277.14 96950 6/14/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1795328A SUPPLIES TOILET TISSUE, LINERS, PAPER T 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,169.16 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 104.06 W 1795328AA SUPPLIES LINERS, PAPER TOWELS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 832.88 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 74.13 Total : 2,180.23 96951 6/14/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1797360 OPS SUPPLIES Page: 17 Packet Page 86 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96951 6/14/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES (Continued) stations' cleaning supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 408.17 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 36.33 Total : 444.50 96952 6/14/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1794288 FAC MAINT - TISSUE, TOWELS, HP FAC MAINT - TISSUE, TOWELS, HP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1,348.65 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 120.25 Total : 1,471.40 96953 6/14/2007 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0507 2989771 5374044 INV#0507 2989771 5374044 EDMO� 5 GALLON WATER BOTTLES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 62.91 HOT/COLD DISPENSER RENTAL 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00 ENERGY SURCHARGE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.87 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.89 Total : 75.67 96954 6/14/2007 071552 CUBBAGE, NANCY CUBBAGE8378 MOSAIC CLASS MOSAIC STEPPING STONE- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 70.00 Total : 70.00 96955 6/14/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 135395 UNIT EQ12EN - EXPANDED ACCY " Page: 18 Packet Page 87 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96955 6/14/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 (Continued) UNIT EQ12EN - EXPANDED ACCY " 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 68.88 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 6.13 135450 UNIT EQ1FI UNIT EQ1 FI 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 155.00 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 13.80 135513 UNIT 236 - PARTS FOR RADIO UNIT 236 - PARTS FOR RADIO 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 92.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.27 720603 UNIT 464 - RADIO REPAIR UNIT 464 - RADIO REPAIR 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 325.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 27.69 Total : 697.73 96956 6/14/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY VL07208003 8TH & WALNUT PETROLEUM CLEF 8TH & WALNUT PETROLEUM CLEF 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 1,058.86 Total : 1,058.86 96957 6/14/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2757 MINUTE TAKING 5/22 & 6/5 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 428.40 Total : 428.40 96958 6/14/2007 068871 DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA HYCS121412 INV#HYCS121412 EDMONDS PD - Page: 19 Packet Page 88 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96958 6/14/2007 068871 DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA (Continued) LUBE, OIL, FILTER CHANGE 001.000.410.521.300.480.00 31.92 TIRE ROTATION 001.000.410.521.300.480.00 13.95 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 001.000.410.521.300.480.00 2.38 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.300.480.00 4.29 Total : 52.54 96959 6/14/2007 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 204195 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 63.77 204196 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 61.08 204197 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 70.60 Total : 195.45 96960 6/14/2007 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2007194 CONSULTING SERVICES - BLDG. C CONSULTING SERVICES - BLDG. 1 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 5,378.83 Total : 5,378.83 96961 6/14/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 81045 UNIT P3 - BLOCK HEATER UNIT P3 - BLOCK HEATER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 34.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.11 Page: 20 Packet Page 89 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96961 6/14/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS (Continued) 81093 UNIT 91 - BEARING ASSEMBLY UNIT 91 - BEARING ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 174.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.68 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.26 81285 UNIT 119 - LIC FRAME UNIT 119 - LIC FRAME 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.99 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.98 Total : 249.01 96962 6/14/2007 067728 EDMONDS CONFERENCE CENTER ECC0518 SUPPLIES FOR BIRDFEST 2007 COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR BIRDFESI 001.000.240.513.110.310.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 96963 6/14/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 10815 UPS/DEPT OF LNI UPS/DEPT OF LNI 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 13.85 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 1.23 Total : 15.08 96964 6/14/2007 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP SCHOLARSHIPS0613 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS: ZAYNAB/ 122.000.640.574.100.490.00 300.00 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP:- 122.000.640.574.100.490.00 132.00 Total : 432.00 96965 6/14/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 153153 INV#153153 CLIENT#3713 EDMON[ Page: 21 Packet Page 90 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96965 6/14/2007 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL (Continued) EXAM FOR IMPOUND #6937 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 37.60 153199 INV#153199 CLIENT #3713 EDMON AMOXI DROPS 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 25.96 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 2.31 Total : 65.87 96966 6/14/2007 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 98875 INV#98875 EDMONDS ANIMAL COP SPAY DOG IMPOUND #6899 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 97.50 SPAY DOG IMPOUND #6853 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 135.00 SPAY CAT IMPOUND #6815 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 86.00 NEUTER DOG IMPOUND #6903 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 85.00 NEUTER DOG IMPOUND #6901 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 97.50 NEUTER CAT IMPOUND #6924 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75 Total : 545.75 96967 6/14/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 025273 MAINT FOR COPIER MAINT FOR COPIER 001.000.230.512.500.480.00 36.20 Total : 36.20 96968 6/14/2007 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES 361120 UNIT EQ16PM - PLATE UNIT EQ16PM - PLATE 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 692.50 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 59.56 Page: 22 Packet Page 91 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96968 6/14/2007 009410 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES (Continued) Total : 752.06 96969 6/14/2007 009800 FACTORY DIRECT TIRE SALES 8248 SPARE TIRE SPARE TIRE, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 72.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.41 Total : 78.41 96970 6/14/2007 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU10484 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES CHAINS FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIF 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 152.28 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.55 Total : 165.83 96971 6/14/2007 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU10475 CITY HALL - SOCKET SET ASSOR' CITY HALL - SOCKET SET ASSOR' 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.27 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.82 Total : 10.09 96972 6/14/2007 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 0531207 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 8,020.00 Total : 8,020.00 96973 6/14/2007 066590 FELIX LLC, ROBERT W FELIX8067 WEIGHT LOSS CLASS WEIGHT LOSS WITH HYPNOSIS CI 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,437.80 Total : 1,437.80 96974 6/14/2007 071669 FERNO WASHINGTON INC 583492 ALS MACH/EQUIPMT Page: 23 Packet Page 92 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96974 6/14/2007 071669 FERNO WASHINGTON INC (Continued) Chair/Cot Ambulance stretcher 001.000.510.526.100.350.00 4,086.00 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.350.00 81.72 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.350.00 370.92 Total : 4,538.64 96975 6/14/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 95340 May 2007 - Section 125 plan fees May 2007 - Section 125 plan fees 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 50.00 May 2007 - Section 132 plan fees 811.000.000.231.590.000.00 30.00 Check mailing fees 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 1.80 Total : 81.80 96976 6/14/2007 063341 FORCIBLE ENTRY 705 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS tubing, ID kit, map cases 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 76.20 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 20.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 8.56 Total : 104.76 96977 6/14/2007 010660 FOSTER, MARLO 55 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 661.71 Total : 661.71 96978 6/14/2007 061589 GALLS INC 5889703501016 UNIT EQ08FI - REMOTE SIREN & A Page: 24 Packet Page 93 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96978 6/14/2007 061589 GALLS INC (Continued) UNIT EQ08FI - REMOTE SIREN & A 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 98.99 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.78 Total : 119.76 96979 6/14/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9378965868 SUPPLIES BAND SAW BLADE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 72.84 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.48 Total : 79.32 96980 6/14/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9369741955 FAC - 1.5 HP MOTOR FAC - 1.5 HP MOTOR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 205.74 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.31 9375224988 PS - CEILING FAN PS - CEILING FAN 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 108.59 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.66 Total : 342.30 96981 6/14/2007 071675 HAMMILL, RONALD HAMMILL REFUND OVERCHARGE ON RECEI REFUND OVERCHARGE ON RECEI 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 20.00 Total : 20.00 96982 6/14/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC FOCS219004 UNIT 484 - REPAIRS AND SERVICE Page: 25 Packet Page 94 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96982 6/14/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC (Continued) UNIT 484 - REPAIRS AND SERVICE 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 716.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 63.77 FOCS219454 UNIT 474 - SERVICE AND REPAIR UNIT 474 - SERVICE AND REPAIR 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 1,314.19 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 116.96 Total : 2,211.42 96983 6/14/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 73466 UNIT 237 - PROCESSOR UNIT 237 - PROCESSOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 331.43 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 29.50 73896 UNIT 238 - HOSE ASSEMBLY UNIT 238 - HOSE ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 106.06 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.44 74021 UNIT EQ01 FI - FLOOR COVER KIT UNIT EQ01 FI - FLOOR COVER KIT 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 52.50 Sales Tax 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 4.67 74088 UNIT 128 - WATER PUMP ASSEMB UNIT 128 - WATER PUMP ASSEMB 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 144.12 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.83 Total : 690.55 96984 6/14/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 12107148 WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTERC Page: 26 Packet Page 95 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96984 6/14/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC (Continued) WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTERC 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 78.88 W-RESET-0.75-018 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 237.40 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 28.15 Total : 344.43 96985 6/14/2007 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC M-233964 E4GA.Services thru 01/13/07 E4GA.Services thru 01/13/07 412.300.630.594.320.650.00 33,618.71 Total : 33,618.71 96986 6/14/2007 064129 HENRY'S PLANT FARM 55457 PLANTS VERBENA, COLEUS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 130.58 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.37 Total : 141.95 96987 6/14/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2074379 6035322500959949 WIRE 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 20.80 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1.85 6032906 6035322500959949 PLANER KIT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 155.47 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 13.84 8043474 6035322500959949 PLASTIC/SPRINKLER HEADS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 73.72 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.56 Page: 27 Packet Page 96 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96987 6/14/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9032166 6035322500959949 WOOD 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 48.66 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.34 Total : 325.24 96988 6/14/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2060955 FS 16 - TAPE FS 16 - TAPE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.99 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.36 2596367 PS - PLUMBING SUPPLIES PS - PLUMBING SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 67.17 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.98 3041619 LIBRARY - MOUNT TAPE, ANGLES LIBRARY - MOUNT TAPE, ANGLES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.63 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.38 3048515 FLEET SHOP - SCREWS, NUTS, W, FLEET SHOP - SCREWS, NUTS, W, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.02 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.10 3062217 PS - SUPPLIES PS - SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.97 FS 17 - SHOWER SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 27.88 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.19 Page: 28 Packet Page 97 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 96988 6/14/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 4041530 LIBRARY - QUAD CLEAR, SOCKET LIBRARY - QUAD CLEAR, SOCKET 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 73.88 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.58 4081570 FS 16 - GECLEAR TUBE FS 16 - GECLEAR TUBE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.88 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.61 4089334 FS 16 - FOLD TOOLS, WASHERS, f FS 16 - FOLD TOOLS, WASHERS, f 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.73 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.01 5042576 PS - CAMLOCK PS - CAMLOCK 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.97 PLAZA - SET 1.7 KTA 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.96 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.40 5042624 PW - SPRAYER, BRUSHES, EPDXN PW - SPRAYER, BRUSHES, EPDXN 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 80.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.17 6032830 FS 20 - REPAIR SUPPLIES FS 20 - REPAIR SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 29.78 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.65 Page: 29 Packet Page 98 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96988 6/14/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 6032833 WATER- 4X6 TIMBER FOR 8200 BL WATER- 4X6 TIMBER FOR 8200 BL 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.97 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.15 6041278 FAC MAINT SHOP - THINNER SUP FAC MAINT SHOP - THINNER SUP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.98 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.25 7080188 FAC - WIPES, CLEANERS FAC - WIPES, CLEANERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.97 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.33 7569178 PS - CAMLOCK PS - CAMLOCK 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.97 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.44 8042141 LIBRARY - 14W SPIRALS LIBRARY - 14W SPIRALS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.88 8092776 FS 16 - ADHESIVE FS 16 - ADHESIVE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.47 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.75 8571267 FAC MAINT - TRUCK SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - TRUCK SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.34 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.45 Page: 30 Packet Page 99 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96988 6/14/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9033898 PW - DOOR STOP & FAC MAINT Sl PW - DOOR STOP & FAC MAINT Sl 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.98 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.85 9041000 PW - SAWZALL, REPAIR SUPPLIES PW - SAWZALL, REPAIR SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 46.92 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.18 9041978 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES FAC MAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.41 FAC - WAX EXTENDER, BOLTS, SF 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.31 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.45 9061854 PS - MAGNETIC STRIP, FILTER PS - MAGNETIC STRIP, FILTER 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.62 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.77 9061871 WATER UNIT 6 - WATER FITTING WATER UNIT 6 - WATER FITTING 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 42.96 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.82 Total : 694.00 96989 6/14/2007 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 7057 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SERVICE! PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR TI 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 6,179.00 Total : 6,179.00 96990 6/14/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73422156 CANON IMAGE RUNNER 9070 LEA; Page: 31 Packet Page 100 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96990 6/14/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 250-00151 Canon Image Runner 9070 Lease- 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 983.50 Total : 983.50 96991 6/14/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE 442620 SHOP -RATCHET SET SHOP -RATCHET SET 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 71.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 6.40 442823 SHOP - WIPER BLADES, SUPPLIES SHOP - WIPER BLADES, SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 171.85 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 15.29 Total : 265.50 96992 6/14/2007 015233 JOBS AVAILABLE 712038 Capital Projects Manager, #07-20 Capital Projects Manager, #07-20 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 122.40 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 132.60 Total : 255.00 96993 6/14/2007 015270 JONES CHEMICALS INC 349532 54278825 HYPOCHLORIT SOLUTION 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 2,989.35 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 263.06 Total : 3,252.41 96994 6/14/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 094512 ENVELOPES MISC. ENVELOPES 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 129.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 11.48 Page: 32 Packet Page 101 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 96994 6/14/2007 018760 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS (Continued) 96995 6/14/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 521012 UNIT 63 - OIL FILTER UNIT 63 - OIL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 521679 UNTI 44 - LENS UNTI 44 - LENS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 521887 UNIT 474 - SUPPLIES UNIT 474 - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 522192 UNTI K93 - LAMPS UNTI K93 - LAMPS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 522205 UNIT E016PM - SUPPLIES UNIT EQ16PM - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 522473 UNIT 372 UNIT 372 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 Amount Total : 140.48 6.23 0.55 4.82 0.43 28.09 2.50 5.40 0.48 16.00 1.42 5.06 0.45 Page: 33 Packet Page 102 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96995 6/14/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 522542 UNIT EQ1FI UNIT EQ1 FI 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 15.32 Sales Tax 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 1.36 522813 UNIT 475 - U JOINT UNIT 475 - U JOINT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 58.49 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.21 522851 UNIT 475 - EXCHANGED WRONG l UNIT 475 - EXCHANGED WRONG l 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.27 522852 UNIT 476 - SUPPLIES UNIT 476 - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.36 522928 UNIT 18 - BATTERY TERMINAL UNIT 18 - BATTERY TERMINAL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.49 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.67 523011 SHOP - V BELT SHOP - V BELT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.57 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.45 523044 UNIT 55 - V BELT UNIT 55 - V BELT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.57 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.45 Page: 34 Packet Page 103 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 96995 6/14/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 523315 SHOP - SUPPLIES SHOP - SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.49 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.40 Total : 232.53 96996 6/14/2007 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 4530 ESMC.Dsn Svcs thru 05/31/07 ESMC.Dsn Svcs thru 05/31/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 7,473.74 Total : 7,473.74 96997 6/14/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 3055 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 105.00 3056 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 90.00 3059 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 3065 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 75.00 Total : 315.00 96998 6/14/2007 071699 MARTZKE, MARLENE MARTZKE0607 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR 1 001.000.640.574.350.430.00 66.93 Total : 66.93 96999 6/14/2007 020036 MCINTOSH, BRIAN MCINTOSH0602 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT FOR JANICE NC 001.000.640.576.800.410.00 141.76 Total : 141.76 Page: 35 Packet Page 104 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97000 6/14/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 65938822 123106800 SUMP PUMP/HOSE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 527.42 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 76.25 66043616 123106800 CAP SCREW/STAINLESS STEEL/P/ 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 75.17 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.40 Total : 684.24 97001 6/14/2007 069285 MERCER MD, JAMES 1005-007 ALS PROF SERVICES May Med Prgm Dir 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,644.75 Total : 1,644.75 97002 6/14/2007 062926 METAL SHORTS INC 39257 002439 CHANNEL IRON 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 183.33 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 16.32 Total : 199.65 97003 6/14/2007 024300 NEBAR SUPPLY COMPANY INC 2962094 SUPPLIES FLEXOGEN HOSE 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 39.34 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 9.92 Total : 49.26 97004 6/14/2007 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB8325 FUN FACTORY FUN FACTORY #8325 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 756.00 Total : 756.00 97005 6/14/2007 071697 NGUYEN, TUYET TNGUYEN0605 REFUND Page: 36 Packet Page 105 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97005 6/14/2007 071697 NGUYEN, TUYET (Continued) YOST POOL REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 110.00 Total : 110.00 97006 6/14/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1520460.001 2091 VFD 411.000.656.594.380.640.00 6,575.00 Freight 411.000.656.594.380.640.00 59.67 Sales Tax 411.000.656.594.380.640.00 570.58 S1534221.001 2091 LAMP/PULLING LUBE 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 71.64 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.16 S1534274.001 2091 PHOTO CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 17.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1.51 S5325860.001 2091 VFD STARTUP SVCS 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 495.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 42.57 Total : 7,839.63 97007 6/14/2007 071698 NORTH SOUND CHRISTIAN NORTHSOUND0605 REFUND YOST POOL REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 95.00 Total : 95.00 97008 6/14/2007 070045 NORTHUP GROUP 1441 INVOICE #1441 - PRE -EMPLOY - El Page: 37 Packet Page 106 of 463 vchlist 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 38 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97008 6/14/2007 070045 NORTHUP GROUP (Continued) PRE -EMPLOYMENT EVAL 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 97009 6/14/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0491398 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 360.58 0491871 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02 Total : 458.60 97010 6/14/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 483 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES VERE PLANNING BOARD MINUTES VERE 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 255.00 Total : 255.00 97011 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 021822 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 165.13 048223 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 226.61 888215 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 217.28 Total : 609.02 97012 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 144799 Toner cartridge - HR (HP 2420) Page: 38 Packet Page 107 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 97012 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 97013 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Toner cartridge - HR (HP 2420) 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 107.12 Paper - HR, CSD, Mayor's office 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 23.06 Paper - HR, CSD, Mayor's office 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 23.05 Paper - HR, CSD, Mayor's office 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 23.05 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 11.59 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 2.05 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 2.06 164272 Office Supplies - L. Carl Office Supplies - L. Carl 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 144.21 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 12.83 Total : 349.02 187912 OFFICE SUPPLIES LAMINATING POUCHES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 48.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.27 444989 OFFICE SUPPLIES LEAFLET HOLDER 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 5.22 Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 0.46 Page: 39 Packet Page 108 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97013 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) 572059 OFFICE SUPPLIES FILE FOLDERS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 28.99 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.49 624376 OFFICE SUPPLIES LEGAL PADS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 12.20 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.99 695546 OFFICE SUPPLIES CATALOG ENVELOPES, LAMINATII 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 77.01 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 6.86 696976 OFFICE SUPPLIES CALCULATORS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 44.98 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.92 702221 POOL OFFICE SUPPLIES WALL CALENDAR, PAPER 001.000.640.575.510.310.00 31.06 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.510.310.00 2.67 705798 OFFICE SUPPLIES BATTERIES 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 10.35 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 0.84 710557 OFFICE SUPPLIES LEGAL PADS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 8.55 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.67 Page: 40 Packet Page 109 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97013 6/14/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) Total : 289.53 97014 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 147446 Toner; pop up paper Toner; pop up paper 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 211.53 Pop up dispenser 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 6.20 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 18.82 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 0.55 Total : 237.10 97015 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 067218 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES INCLUDIP MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES INCLUDIP 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 302.59 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 26.93 172298 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - D.S. DE MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES - D.S. DE 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 383.33 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 34.12 Total : 746.97 97016 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 159550 PREVENTION SUPPLIES office supplies 001.000.510.522.300.310.00 108.87 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.300.310.00 9.70 194264 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES office supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 127.59 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 11.35 Page: 41 Packet Page 110 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97016 6/14/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) Total : 257.51 97017 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 095727 INV#095727 ACCT#520437 250POL TEN PACKS OF 120 MIN AUDIO TA 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 27.26 LAMINATING POUCHES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 18.56 6X9 MAILING ENVELOPES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 26.40 WATCH/CALC BATTERIES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.08 INK FOR PATROL PIXMA PRINTER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 71.80 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 2.43 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.93 Total : 163.46 97018 6/14/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 016156 PW ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES - LA PW ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES - LA 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 98.28 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 8.75 Total : 107.03 97019 6/14/2007 063750 ORCA PACIFIC 028645 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL CHEMICALS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 227.66 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.26 Total : 247.92 97020 6/14/2007 071695 PACIFIC ANESTHESIA PC Bus Lic Refund REF OF OVERPMT Refund overpmt of Bus Lic 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00 Page: 42 Packet Page 111 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97020 6/14/2007 071695 071695 PACIFIC ANESTHESIA PC (Continued) Total : 40.00 97021 6/14/2007 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 274929 COLOR METER FEE FOR PW Copif COLOR METER FEE FOR PW Copif 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 9.61 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 0.86 Total : 10.47 97022 6/14/2007 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC. 559434 PAINT SUPPLIES PAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.90 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.84 Total : 34.74 97023 6/14/2007 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC. 559390 YOST PARK - PAINT YOST PARK - PAINT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.80 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.14 Total : 13.94 97024 6/14/2007 071700 PEACEY, SUSAN PEACEY0607 POOL REFUND POOL REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 100.00 Total : 100.00 97025 6/14/2007 062770 PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL INC 705275 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 980.00 Total : 980.00 97026 6/14/2007 069690 PERFORMANCE RADIATOR 292199 UNIT 487 - RADIATOR Page: 43 Packet Page 112 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97026 6/14/2007 069690 PERFORMANCE RADIATOR (Continued) UNIT 487 - RADIATOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 192.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.09 Total : 209.09 97027 6/14/2007 063890 PERFORMANCE SIGN PRODUCTS INC 43109 STREET - IOLINE 60 DEGREE BLAI STREET - IOLINE 60 DEGREE BLA[ 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 23.40 Freight 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.44 Total : 30.84 97028 6/14/2007 064167 POLLARDWATER.COM-EAST 1199297-IN WATER - DECHLORINATING DIFFL WATER - DECHLORINATING DIFFL 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 684.00 LPD TABLET SCREEN 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 59.00 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 18.97 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 67.82 Total : 829.79 97029 6/14/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 430 OPERATIONS SUPPLIES rescue tech bags 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.89 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 0.26 Total : 3.15 97030 6/14/2007 062909 PRIMA Junglov, K REGISTRATION RISK MGMNT Page: 44 Packet Page 113 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97030 6/14/2007 062909 PRIMA (Continued) Registration K Junglov Risk Mngmnt 001.000.310.514.230.490.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 97031 6/14/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -Cl 24 hour alarm monitoring -CH 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00 Total : 35.00 97032 6/14/2007 069479 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD PW-02-691-019 CTED 10869 2002 SANITARY SEWE Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanii 411.000.655.582.100.780.00 36,447.07 Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanii 411.000.655.592.100.830.00 2,915.77 Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanii 414.000.656.582.100.780.00 34,877.93 Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanii 414.000.656.592.100.830.00 2,790.23 PW-02-691-PRE-123 CTED 11830 220TH ST SW IMPRVE Pr Pmt CTED 11830 220th St SW 112.506.630.591.950.780.00 18,143.27 Int Pmt CTED 11830 220th St SW 112.506.630.592.950.830.00 1,451.46 PW-04-691-029 CTED 13873 220TH ST SW IMPRO\ Pr Pmt CTED 13873 220th St SW 112.506.630.591.951.780.00 20,000.01 Int Pmt CTED 13873 220th St SW 112.506.630.592.951.830.00 1,799.99 PW-04-691-030 CTED 13818 STORMWATER OUTF) Pr Pmt CTED 13818 Stormwater Out 411.000.652.582.100.780.00 30,281.25 Int Pmt CTED 13818 Stormwater Ou- 411.000.652.592.100.830.00 2,725.32 Page: 45 Packet Page 114 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 46 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97032 6/14/2007 069479 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD (Continued) PW-04-691-031 CTED 13819 5 CORNERS PUMP ST Pr Pmt CTED 13819 5 Corner Pump 411.000.654.582.100.780.00 4,294.74 Int Pmt CTED 13819 5 Corner Pump 411.000.654.592.100.830.00 386.53 PW-05-691-015 CTED 15162 2005 SEWER L/S REH. Pr Pmt CTED 15162 Sewer Lift Static 411.000.655.582.350.780.00 12,809.49 Int Pmt CTED 15162 Sewer Lift Static 411.000.655.592.350.830.00 1,216.90 PW-06-962-012 CTED 17005 100TH AVE W ROW S' Int Pmt CTED 17005 100th Ave W 112.200.630.592.950.831.00 654.25 Total : 170,794.21 97033 6/14/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANI 0017019-IN EDMCITW CARTRIDGE ADAPTER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.35 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.53 0017121-IN EDMCITW EYE WASH 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 78.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 6.55 0017142-IN EDMCITW SNAP HOOK/ROPE AJUSTER 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 207.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 17.39 Total : 315.82 97034 6/14/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 286.66 Page: 46 Packet Page 115 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 47 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97034 6/14/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 0230757007 PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 308.42 1916766007 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 76.83 2753166004 PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & CC PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & CC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 535.61 2776365005 Public Works Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 33.50 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 127.28 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 127.28 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 127.28 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 127.28 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 127.28 2986629000 LIFT STATION #13 LIFT STATION #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 86.47 3689976003 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 179.17 5254926008 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 192.80 5322323139 Fire Station # 16 Fire Station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 255.98 Page: 47 Packet Page 116 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 48 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97034 6/14/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 5672895009 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 30.87 5903085008 FLEET Fleet 7110 210th St SW 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 397.30 6439566008 PUBLIC SAFETY -FIRE STATION PUBLIC SAFETY -FIRE STATION 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 577.82 8851908007 LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.79 9919661109 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 177.38 Total : 3,830.00 97035 6/14/2007 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 07-351 COURT SECURITY OFFICER COURT SECURITY OFFICER 001.000.230.512.500.410.00 2,020.00 Total : 2,020.00 97036 6/14/2007 030695 PUMPTECH INC 26283 BALL CHECKS/SEATS/PUMP BALL CHECKS/SEATS/PUMP 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,594.03 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 141.87 Total : 1,735.90 97037 6/14/2007 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 77391 INSCRIPTION MARKER INSCRIPTION:- 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00 78006 MARKER MARKER: MILLS 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 285.00 Page: 48 Packet Page 117 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 49 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97037 6/14/2007 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC (Continued) 78247 MARKER MARKER: CHRISTIANSON 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 285.00 Total : 645.00 97038 6/14/2007 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332 B FLOW METERING STATIONS FLOW METERING STATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.82 Total : 137.82 97039 6/14/2007 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC 226130 SEWER - PROPERTY LEASE FOR! SEWER - PROPERTY LEASE FOR! 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 275.00 Total : 275.00 97040 6/14/2007 071696 RANKINS, KATE KRANKINS0608 MONITOR TRAINING TRAINING FOR MONITOR DUTIES 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 12.00 Total : 12.00 97041 6/14/2007 071694 RAPID REFILL INK 10419 OPS SUPPLIES printer cartridges 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 232.35 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 20.68 Total : 253.03 97042 6/14/2007 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0705085 E5MC.Services thru 06/01/07 E5MC.Services thru 06/01/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,980.61 Total : 1,980.61 97043 6/14/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9412830429 WATER - DUMPED ASPHALT FEES Page: 49 Packet Page 118 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 50 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 97043 6/14/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) WATER - DUMPED ASPHALT FEES 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 21.04 SAND SUPPLIES 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 244.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 19.93 9412854703 WATER - ASPHALT WATER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 628.32 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 55.92 9412864300 WATER - ASPHALT WATER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 420.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 37.38 9412875335 WATER -ASPHALT WATER -ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1,440.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 128.16 9412899513 WATER - ASPHALT WATER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 720.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 64.08 9412910115 WATER - ASPHALT WATER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 120.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.68 Page: 50 Packet Page 119 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 51 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97043 6/14/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS (Continued) 9412943198 WATER - ASPHALT WATER - ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 130.65 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.62 Total : 4,051.78 97044 6/14/2007 066978 ROGERS MACHINERY 659434 WATER- SERVICE AND REPAIR TC WATER- SERVICE AND REPAIR TC 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 161.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 14.33 659435 WATER- SERVICE AND REPAIR TC WATER- SERVICE AND REPAIR TC 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 161.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 14.33 Total : 350.66 97045 6/14/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY MAY 2007 MAY 2007 - ACCOUNT #70014 EDM PICK UP SIX ANIMAL CARCASSES 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 117.00 PICK UP FOUR ANIMAL CARCASS[ 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 78.00 Total : 195.00 97046 6/14/2007 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 63884 UNIT EQ10FI - 2007 SUBURBAN UNIT EQ10FI - 2007 SUBURBAN 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 31,699.83 ADMIN LIC FEES 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 40.50 Sales Tax 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 2,916.38 Total : 34,656.71 Page: 51 Packet Page 120 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 52 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97047 6/14/2007 067644 SIGNON 1499 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 147.28 Total : 147.28 97048 6/14/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 5320018384 SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 28.28 Total : 28.28 97049 6/14/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 581040297 206-001-485-5 24400 HWY 99/RICHMOND PARK 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 27.60 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.66 719043121 463-001-671-7 8421 244 ST/RICHMOND PK 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 27.60 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.66 966014055 620-001-500-3 VARIOUS LOCATION 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 6.91 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.41 Total : 65.84 97050 6/14/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2260043795 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 46.56 3050047152 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 271.05 3800017489 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 74.34 Page: 52 Packet Page 121 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 53 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97050 6/14/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 4510017488 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.28 4640017416 TELEMETRY SYSTEM TELEMETRY SYSTEM 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 27.60 6000013000 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 9,133.25 6100013009 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,944.24 6100013306 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 170.07 6200013008 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,814.76 Total : 19,510.15 97051 6/14/2007 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2007054 INV#2007054 EDMONDS PD - APRII 50.92 BOOKINGS FOR APRIL 2007 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 4,517.62 669.17 HOUSING DAYS FOR APRIL 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 39,112.99 2007071 INV#2007071 EDMONDS PD - MAY 52.67 BOOKINGS FOR MAY 2007 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 4,672.88 710.67 HOUSING DAYS FOR MAY C 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 41,538.66 Total : 89,842.15 97052 6/14/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587 DUMP CHARGES DUMP CHARGES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 576.16 Page: 53 Packet Page 122 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 54 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97052 6/14/2007 038300 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) Total : 576.16 97053 6/14/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40 Total : 24.78 97054 6/14/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS garbage & recycle for PS 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 487.49 03585 garbage & recycle for FAC garbage & recycle for FAC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.90 03586 garbage & recycle for Library garbage & recycle for Library 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 491.20 03588 garbage & recycle -City Hall garbage & recycle -City Hall 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 379.46 Total : 1,915.05 97055 6/14/2007 062280 SOUND SEAL & PACKING CO 11459 MECHANICAL SEAL MECHANICAL SEAL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,471.04 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 24.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 133.10 Total : 1,628.64 97056 6/14/2007 038413 SOUND TRACTOR IN62144 SUPPLIES Page: 54 Packet Page 123 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 55 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97056 6/14/2007 038413 SOUND TRACTOR (Continued) PULLEYS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 196.48 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.57 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.38 Total : 219.43 97057 6/14/2007 071701 ST LUKE SCHOOL ST.LUKE0607 REFUND REFUND - RETURNING CREDIT Ol� 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 7.00 Total : 7.00 97058 6/14/2007 070684 STANTEC CONSULTING INC 148016 53769 SUPPORT SERVICES 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 822.96 Total : 822.96 97059 6/14/2007 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L65289 AUDIT FEES FOR PERIOD 06-06 Audit Fees 001.000.390.519.900.510.00 11,388.17 Audit Fees 411.000.652.542.900.510.00 474.51 Audit Fees 411.000.654.534.800.510.00 1,898.03 Audit Fees 411.000.655.535.800.510.00 1,898.03 Audit Fees 411.000.656.538.800.510.00 1,898.03 Audit Fees 111.000.653.543.300.510.00 474.51 Audit Fees 511.000.657.548.680.510.00 949.00 Total : 18,980.28 Page: 55 Packet Page 124 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 56 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 97060 6/14/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2563142 2564347 2565343 2567803 PO # Description/Account Amount WATER - CLAMP HOSE WATER - CLAMP HOSE 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 35.10 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 9.24 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.81 WATER - CLAMP HOSE WATER - CLAMP HOSE 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.02 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 9.16 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.39 WATER - CLAMP HOSE WATER - CLAMP HOSE 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 45.63 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 9.24 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.71 WATER/SEWER - RAGS, SAFETY C WATER/SEWER - RAGS, SAFETY C 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 92.11 WATER/SEWER - RAGS, SAFETY C 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 92.11 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.93 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.93 Total : 325.38 Page: 56 Packet Page 125 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 57 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97061 6/14/2007 040250 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING (Continued) LIME FLOUR, DEADLINE, PRO MIX, 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 394.35 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 38.53 Total : 432.88 97062 6/14/2007 071693 SUMNER TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 61994 REPAIRS REPAIR OF MOWER 130.000.640.536.500.480.00 167.90 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.480.00 14.78 Total : 182.68 97063 6/14/2007 068619 SWENSON, LINDA 1155 CRAZE COVER PHOTO COVER PHOTO FOR SEPT-DEC CF 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 99.99 Total : 99.99 97064 6/14/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18802128 100323 WEDGE ANCHORS/CAP SCREW/A 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 211.07 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 18.79 Total : 229.86 97065 6/14/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10539935 STREET - COMBINATION PLIERS STREET - COMBINATION PLIERS 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 61.05 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 5.43 Total : 66.48 97066 6/14/2007 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA 000421 INTERNET ACCESS INTERNET ACCESS FOR CEMETEF 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 17.95 Page: 57 Packet Page 126 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 58 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97066 6/14/2007 065710 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA (Continued) Total : 17.95 97067 6/14/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY C/A 148134 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 17.23 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 17.24 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.47 Capital Projects Manager, #07-20 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.47 Gymnastics/Youth Fitness Instructor, 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 38.30 Street/Storm Maint. Laborer, #07-25 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 38.30 Economic Dev. Director, #07-24 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 38.30 Total : 218.31 97068 6/14/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 101411 DAY CAMP AD DAY CAMP AD 001.000.640.574.200.440.00 175.00 Total : 175.00 97069 6/14/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1499879 NEWSPAPER ADS Council & Plann Bd Agendas 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,132.23 1509206 NEWSPAPER AD Hearing Re: Parking penalty fees 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 31.68 Total : 1,163.91 97070 6/14/2007 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 209133 SUPPLIES Page: 58 Packet Page 127 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 59 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97070 6/14/2007 027269 THE PART WORKS INC (Continued) REPAIR KITS:- 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 94.80 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.44 Total : 103.24 97071 6/14/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES C/A 042483000 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 173.41 Street/Stormwater Manager, #07-22 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 173.42 Street/Storm Water Manager, #07-22 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 346.83 Capital Projects Manager, #07-20 001.000.620.532.200.440.00 338.66 Capital Projects Manager, #07-20 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 355.00 Street/Storm Maint. Laborer, #07-25 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 319.33 Economic Dev. Director, #07-24 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 295.14 Total : 2,001.79 97072 6/14/2007 064963 TOP FOODS 392737 ALS SUPPLIES stethoscope batteries 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 14.76 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 1.31 Total : 16.07 97073 6/14/2007 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES 5/31/07 MEBT 2 Accounts (through 5/31/07) MEBT 2 Accounts (through 5/31/07) 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 133.73 Page: 59 Packet Page 128 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 60 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97073 6/14/2007 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES (Continued) 5/31/07-2 MEBT 2 accounts - system charges MEBT 2 accounts - system charges 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 78.00 Total : 211.73 97074 6/14/2007 068407 TROUT UNLIMITED LAEBUGTEN8292 BEGINNING FISHING CLASS BEGINNING FISHING FOR YOUNG; 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 294.00 Total : 294.00 97075 6/14/2007 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 381413 SEWER - MANHOLE COVER LIFTEI SEWER - MANHOLE COVER LIFTEI 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 98.44 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 20.75 Total : 119.19 97076 6/14/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.37 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODI SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODI 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.02 425-744-1691 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODE SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODE 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.37 425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 56.07 425-771-4741 EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 48.57 425-776-5316 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MC GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MC 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 105.15 Page: 60 Packet Page 129 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 61 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97076 6/14/2007 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) Total : 340.55 97077 6/14/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.03 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 269.35 425-206-1137 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 26.50 425-206-1141 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.43 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.22 425-206-4810 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.17 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.32 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STAT Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at P 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.15 425-673-5978 LIFT STATION #1 Lift Station #1 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 47.63 425-712-8347 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 57.60 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 115.86 425-776-6829 CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 115.86 Page: 61 Packet Page 130 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 62 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97077 6/14/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) 425-778-3297 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 17.93 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 33.29 425-AB9-0530 1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDW 1 st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edward: 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.40 Total : 1,076.74 97078 6/14/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 770096328-00001 425-238-8252 cell phone -Dave Sittauer 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 2.02 Total : 2.02 97079 6/14/2007 071584 VILLALOBOS, JOEL VILLALOBOS0608 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ N 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 176.00 Total : 176.00 97080 6/14/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0600941 TRAINING TA,MF,PI,SN,JS 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00 IC lunch 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 8.09 Total : 408.09 97081 6/14/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 106017207 INV#106017207 EDMONDS PD BACKGROUND CHECKS 05/07 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 96.00 Total : 96.00 97082 6/14/2007 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-5735 WATER - REMOVE LEANING TREE WATER - REMOVE LEANING TREE 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 715.00 Page: 62 Packet Page 131 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 63 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 97082 6/14/2007 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS (Continued) 06-5757 STREET- TREE REMOVAL AT 6930 STREET- TREE REMOVAL AT 6930 111.000.653.542.710.410.00 565.00 Total : 1,280.00 97083 6/14/2007 047665 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION MGG215 WEF MEMBERSHIP DUES - J WAIT WEF MEMBERSHIP DUES - J WAIT 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 157.00 Total : 157.00 97084 6/14/2007 068106 WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS 5587 OPS COMMUNICATIONS plate/cup Motorola 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 40.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 6.67 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 4.15 Total : 50.82 97085 6/14/2007 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 33465001 PLANTS EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 216.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.22 Total : 235.22 97086 6/14/2007 069969 WILLIAMS, PAMELA WILLIAMS0604 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR 1 001.000.640.574.350.430.00 111.55 Total : 111.55 97087 6/14/2007 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 213 UMPIRING SERVICES UMPIRING OF CO-ED AND MEN'S 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 2,940.00 Total : 2,940.00 Page: 63 Packet Page 132 of 463 vchlist Voucher List Page: 64 06/14/2007 1:43:43PM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 176 Vouchers for bank code : front 176 Vouchers in this report Invoice PO # Description/Account Bank total Total vouchers Amount 607,134.06 607,134.06 Page: 64 Packet Page 133 of 463 AM-1029 2.D. Claims for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Linda Hynd Submitted For: Sandy Chase Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: Action: t n fnrm a+inn Subject Title Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from James R. Lorent (amount undetermined), and Melissa Beard ($440.81). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative James R. Lorent 18514 79th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 (Amount undetermined) Melissa Beard 17511 71 st Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 ($440.81) Fiscal Impact A ttarrhmnnte Link: Lorent Claim for Damages Link: Beard Claim for Damages Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox 1 City Clerk 2 Mayor 3 Final Approval Form Started By: Linda Hynd Approved By Date Status Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 11:28 AM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 12:16 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:19 PM APRV Started On: 06/06/2007 11:41 AM Packet Page 134 of 463 Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 135 of 463 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM ate CI m o Received by C k Momy5 ff CLE y�Pm AOCS - O f{ CNT who resides at 1 8 S �% �L P_ lease take note that 1 W E o VD .S WA- cBFCR 9 mailing address 19 A M . home phone S ' Oe/ , work phone # LU-?941 is claiming damages against C l t" ( OP & Z M 0,v0 S in the sum of $ "Z arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: -7s f J'il L 02 - 00 TIME: 0 T j5- AM LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: _� Zff k M!7A//L/ S / r DESCRIPTION: Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. DAviD Tt'Miatmox `Zs9/ Zvi^ /9r S6bYz -[/•vr' e,A Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes _- <No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: _ and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * License Plate # v O 6 U N A Driver License # L a 9 C Type Auto: 'R86\ U DTZA A b ear) (make) (model) DRIVER: AMES TC LQiZLNT OWNER: MAaiO f \/GYO'u'/JA 6AIz-ZA Address: / 6 PoL, 1\/ Address: (q )o A OA M 5 A U6- QMa-v A '17 a 6 TOPPEWISH evA 117gt/ Phone#. a.p4 _ q c - /Ole/G Phone#: $d9- 5Zg f - `_Z 9,,/:2 Name: Address: Name: Address: * *NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND IZED 1, �/aMES Zo L©I?,,V being first duly sw , depose and say that I am the cl ant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof a believe the same to be true. Signature of Claimants) State of Washington County of J'Sh& keG ►rM`i1, I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -5C true G, ✓�+� is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: f° 6%G7 °,�prr�uarrrsss00e Signature -re1Zrf i3 .,ems° •; • COM4f (P NO F O T,9 Title My appointment expires G / fa : s CIO : r; ; '9 ; O .0� A -�•� Ge •ce ego •n,• Z/C � . 2010 � • °°. 48N/NCl0,\- Packet Page 136 of 463 CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES.- FORM Date Claim Form R efByEU177 Please take note that _ el-ASSwho resides at t �� '�J!�`,-kr� t Z�Y'rtb�y�S-. (AIA- `(�i% 7�mailing address C home phone # q25 �6zgwork phone # ? 71 N21c 1 is claiming damages against r IT Y BF in the sum of $ L f arising out of the following circumstances listed below. 1%M DATE OF OCCURRENCE: _ 3 --Q J bR (p - --O-J TIME: 115 °L- LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: r)0 C5V A'tyt? 1,3 . 'Phi i r T I7i nFyD n w i . � i i /.--r ., DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. WA-01 INU 11\ I T-V A-r r-t rJr- <T pia 1-1 R i.. t_ _ 2.-A'-7 -t- T- A (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) pscP-0RXS ( N 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: Yes n No * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * License Plate # ?F Driver License # �lwzh 2-9 3 c 7. Type Auto: fZW3 /} (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: GffYV . OWNER: L l GS Address: C,- Phone#: Passengers: d� Name: J Address: Address: �c Phone#: 2-5 - Name: Address: Packet Page 137 of 463 * *,NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED being first duly swom, -depose avid say that. I am too,, claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believ e X State of Washington County of A&kd� S f/ Signature of Claimant(s) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatis the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes me tioned in the instrument. Dated: 13 7 Signature #0T Title -s s My appointment expires O 7 y10 ~ t Packet Page 138 of 463 0:1- iental" LONG'S AUTO REBUILD Inc. Jim Singer conisio_ Repair systems Owner 815 South National Bremerton, WA 98312 (360) 373-3210 ATERIALS No. ESTIMATE OF REPAIRS VERBAL AS LISTED FOR LAOR ANDAGRE AGREEMENTS OTBNDNGMESTIMATES FREE Owner % _ L`� '�° / '' Date �' 1 b �' -l7 Address Phone Est. No. Insurance Co. Order No. License Address Phone Number Year Make 3 �Wdel C:". i')i 1111ea e `° SERIAL NO. QUAN. DESCRIPTION OF LABOR OR MATERIAL PART NO. MATERIAL LABOR ect ,,J a PARTS PRICES BASED ON STANDARD CATALOG PROCUREMENT PRICE LISTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE PROCUREMENTAND DELIVERY CHARGES MAY BE ADDED FOR SPECIAL SERVICE ON ITEMS NOT AVAILABLE LOCALLY TOTAL MATERIAL ' Old parts removed from cars will be junked unless otherwise instructed in writing The above is an estimate based on our inspection and does not cover additional parts or labor which may be required after the work has been opened up. Occasionally after work has started, wom parts are discovered which were not evident on first inspection. Because of this, the above prices are not guaranteed. Estimate Estimated By Approved By Total Labor Total Material Tow & Storage Sub Total AUTHORIZED AND ACCEPTED Date By Owner or Agent �r o .ne Tax !� TOTAL °� AM-1020 Civic Center Skateboard Park Council Acceptance Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis Submitted For: Dave Gebert Time: Department: Engineering Type: Review Committee: Action: in fnrm a+inn Consent Action Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the Civic Center Skateboard Park project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the Civic Center Skateboard Park project. Previous Council Action On July 25, 2006, Council authorized staff to purchase Skateboard Park components from Northwest Recreation for $81,947.25. 2.E. On August 22, 2006, Council authorized Staff to call for bids for the Skateboard Park construction project. On November 14, 2006, Council awarded a contract for construction of the Civic Center Skateboard Park project to Precision Earthworks in the amount of $231,336.27. Narrative The Civic Center Skateboard Park project is complete. The project was designed, inspected and accepted by Staff. Budget Contractor — Precision Earthworks $246,317 Components — Northwest Recreation 81,947 Advertising 324 1% Arts 2,313 Miscellaneous 757 Total Project Cost $331,658 $338,917 Packet Page 140 of 463 Staff recommends that Council accept the project. No files) attached. Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 06/05/2007 11:49 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 06/05/2007 11:51 AM APRV 3 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 06/05/2007 12:00 PM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2007 08:10 AM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2007 08:22 AM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/12/2007 10:29 AM APRV Started On: 06/05/2007 09:48 Form Started By: Conni Curtis AM Final Approval Date: 06/12/2007 Packet Page 141 of 463 AM-1021 242nd Street SW Storm Improvements Council Acceptance Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis Submitted For: Dave Gebert Time: Department: Engineering Type: Review Committee: Action: in fnrm a+inn Consent Action 2.F. Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the 242nd Street SW Storm Improvements (Phase II) project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the 242nd Street SW Storm Improvements (Phase II) project. Previous Council Action On April 25, 2006, Council authorized Staff to call for bids on the 242nd Street SW Storm Improvements (Phase II) project. On May 30, 2006, Council awarded a contract for the project to Interwest Construction, Inc. in the amount of $134,151.58. Narrative Phase II of the 242nd Street SW Storm Improvements project is complete. The project was designed, inspected and accepted by Staff. Budget Contractor — Interwest Construction $150,050 Materials Testing 783 Advertising 341 Total Project Costs $151,174 Staff recommends that Council accept the project. Fiscal Impact Aftarhmnntc No file(s) attached. $180,000 Packet Page 142 of 463 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 06/05/2007 11:34 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 06/05/2007 11:42 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2007 08:10 AM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2007 08:22 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/12/2007 10:29 AM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 06/05/2007 11:07 AM Final Approval Date: 06/12/2007 Packet Page 143 of 463 AM-1025 2006 Street Overlay Program Council Acceptance Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis Submitted For: Dave Gebert Time: Department: Engineering Type: Review Committee: Action: in fnrm a+inn Consent Action 2.G. Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the 2006 Street Overlay Program and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council accept the 2006 Street Overlay project. Previous Council Action On March 21, 2006, Council authorized Staff to call for bids for the 2006 Street Overlay Program. On May 23, 2006, Council awarded a contract for the 2006 Street Overlay Program to Wilder Construction Company in the amount of $443,098.50. Narrative The 2006 Street Overlay project is complete. The project was designed, inspected and accepted by Staff. Budget $493,000 Contractors Wilder Construction $420,799 Marshbank Construction $ 11,571 Miscellaneous $ 356 Total Project Costs $432,726 Staff recommends that Council accept the project. Fiscal Impact Attarhmnntc No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 06/11/2007 05:58 AM APRV Packet Page 144 of 463 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 06/11/2007 07:58 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2007 08:10 AM APRV 4 Mayor 5 Final Approval Form Started By: Conni Curtis Final Approval Date: 06/12/2007 Gary Haakenson 06/11/2007 08:22 AM APRV Sandy Chase 06/12/2007 10:29 AM APRV Started On: 06/06/2007 08:23 AM Packet Page 145 of 463 AM-1043 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization Contract Award Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis Submitted For: Dave Gebert Time: Consent Department: Engineering Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Information 2.H. Subject Title Report of bids opened on May 22, 2007 for the 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization project and award of contract to Road Construction Northwest, Inc. ($899,631) Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council award a contract to Road Construction Northwest, Inc. in the amount of $899,631 for the 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization project. Previous Council Action On April 17, 2007, Council authorized Staff to advertise for bids the 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization project. Narrative On May 22, 2007, the City received four bids for the 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization contract. The bid tabulation summary is provided as Attachment 1. The bids ranged from a low of $899,631.00 to a high of $954,962.65. The Engineer's estimate was $701,865.14. The low bid was submitted by Road Construction Northwest, Inc. A review of the low bidder's record was satisfactory. The adopted 2007 Fund 112 Capital Budget includes $1,000,000 for this project. The project is funded in large part by a $624,750 low -interest Public Works Trust Fund loan. Sufficient funds are included in the budget to award the contract to Road Construction Northwest as follows: Budget $1,000,000 Less: Contract Award $899,631 Engineering 80,000 1 % Public Art N/A Advertising 500 Material Testing 5,000 Total $985,131 Balance Available for Contingency $ 14,869 Packet Page 146 of 463 The balance available for contingency is very small and would generally not be considered by Staff to be a comfortable amount. However, Staff has reviewed the project scope and design with Road Construction Northwest and the design consultant to identify possible cost reductions. Several revisions have been identified that are expected to result in approximately $50,000 in cost savings. Staff intends to implement these cost reductions by change order, which will free up additional funds for contingency for potential unforeseen cost increases. This project will require closure of 100th Avenue West from 241st Place SW to Firdale Avenue for an estimated three to four months. Detour routes will be established and clearly marked with appropriate signage. See Attachment 2. Notification to the public will be distributed prior to road closure. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Bid Tab Link: Detour Plan Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 06/13/2007 02:11 PM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 06/13/2007 02:19 PM APRV 3 Public Works Noel Miller 06/13/2007 02:38 PM APRV 4 City Clerk 5 Mayor 6 Final Approval Form Started By: Conni Curtis Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:40 PM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 02:53 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:18 PM APRV Started On: 06/13/2007 01:28 PM Packet Page 147 of 463 Bid Tabulation City of Edmonds 100th Avenue West Right -of -Way Stabilization (E1CC/c076) Bids Opened May 22, 2007 Road Engineer's Construction Estimate NW Wilder Trimaxx Dennis Craig $701,854.14 $899,631.00 $941,953.25 $967,607.00 $954,962.65 Packet Page 148 of 463 � PL SW Qom' 236TH Q o J > PL LEGEND o, 23 iT '7TH o z " � � 0 p4 237TH c - ROAD CLOSURE 0 o cn DETOUR ROUTE PL SW 238TH ST SW 0 PL (2-WY) 3: F LOCAL ACCESS ONLY w > o 0 T a 238TH ST SW ® WORK ZONE Q z �`39T ■ ■ "ROAD CLOSED" SIGNAGE � No � ROAD CLOSED > y ST i "ROAD CLOSED AHEAD" o ''r m 239TH a- SIGNAGE J a- 240TH PL = cn LOCAL -w-w �0-\ ST rn 240TH ST SW 240TH 0 ACCESS 0 _ PL ONLY z 240TH PL SW co 241 ST 240TH PL SW o ST SW N 241 ST PL SW 241 ST PL SW F n -oLO F- 3�: cn ROAD 2'1 a w o Q CLOSED 1 �p 2ND PL > 2 2\-, _,off j 242ND PL SW Q 243RD PL SW -° 243RD PL 244TH ST SW 244TH ST SW 244TH ST SW � z z z N 00 acket Page 149 of 463 AM-1041 Substitute House Bill 1756 - Fire Department Annual Compliance Report Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Tom Tomberg Time: Department: Fire Type: Review Committee: Public Safety Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Consent Information Subject Title Substitute House Bill 1756 - Fire Department Annual Compliance Report. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve as part of Consent Agenda. Previous Council Action 2.I. On November 28, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1133 adopting the performance, policy, standards, and objectives outlined in the Washington Legislature Substitute House Bill 1756 as the Edmonds Fire Department emergency resource deployment and response time objectives. On June 12, 2007, the Public Safety Committee directed Fire Staff to place Substitute House Bill 1756 - Fire Department Annual Compliance Report on the City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve. Narrative SHB 1756 requires the evaluation of the Council -adopted levels of service, deployment delivery methods, and response time objectives on an annual basis. The evaluations are based on data relating to the levels of service, deployment, and the achievement of each response time objective established by Council. The response time data is extracted from emergency information entered into the Fire Department records management system by Department personnel using WebFIRS software. The evaluation is delivered to the Council and the public annually beginning in 2007 with the comparison of 2006 data against the adopted standards. The reporting format below is the one that will be used in subsequent years to report annual compliance with Council -adopted standards to the City Council and the public. Substitute House Bill 1756 - Fire Department Annual Compliance Report has been placed on the Fire Department website: www.edmondsfire.org. As required by SHB 1756, the 2006 Compliance Report includes four Sections: Section 1: Council Resolution 1133. Section 2: Five Policy Statements that prove the existence of the Fire Department, describes services the Department provides, the Department's organizational structure, the expected number Packet Page 150 of 463 of Department employees, and the functions those employees are expected to perform. Section 3: Comparison of 2006 response times to each adopted response standard. Section 4: An explanation of why Council -adopted standards are not met, the predictable consequences of failing to meet the adopted standards, and the steps necessary to correct deficiencies in order to achieve compliance. The four Sections are attached to this Agenda Memo. Sections 1, 2, and 3 provide background to the core reporting requirement of SHB 1756 contained in Section 4 Council -Adopted Standards Not Met. Changes forwarded by the the City Attorney have been integrated into this compliance report. Link: SHb 1756 Compliance Report Link: SHB 1756 Compliance Report Link: SHB 1756 Compliance Report Link: SHB 1756 Complianace Report Fiscal Impact Attnehmentc Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:40 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 02:53 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Tom Started On: 06/13/2007 01:03 Tomberg PM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 151 of 463 SECTION 1 RESOLUTION NO. 1133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE PERFORMANCE POLICY, STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVES OUTLINED IN SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1756 AS EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY RESOURCE DEPLOYMENT AND RESPONSE TIME OBJECTIVES. WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department is legally established as a fire department through Ordinance No. 254 approved by the City of Edmonds City Council on October 16, 1912 to provide for the prevention of and protection from fire in the city and whose emergency services now include fire suppression, emergency medical services at the basic life support -defibrillator and advanced life support levels, hazardous materials response, technical rescue response, marine rescue and fire suppression, and disaster preparedness and response; and, WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has a mission statement and goals and objectives to guide the organization in providing emergency services that include fire suppression, emergency medical services at the basic life support - defibrillator and advanced life support levels, hazardous materials response, technical rescue response, marine rescue and fire suppression, and disaster preparedness and response; and, WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has a basic organizational structure which includes elected officials, Chief Fire Officers, Fire Officers, Firefighters, Firefighter/Paramedics and Firefighter/EMTs; and, WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has a certain number of Packet Page 152 of 463 members now and in the future who perform the tasks required to accomplish the response objectives; and, WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department is required by state law to establish turnout and response time goals for the emergency services is provides; and, WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has evaluated the elements identified in SHB 1756 and included those provisions deemed appropriate in the Department's emergency service delivery; and, WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has developed written response coverage objectives required to comply with applicable provisions of SHB 1756; and, WHEREAS, the response coverage document is in furtherance of the City of Edmonds duty to the public at large and does not create a specific duty to any individual in the event of an emergency response; and WHEREAS, each emergency response occurs under a unique set of circumstances and competing emergency needs may impact response in any specific situation; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds obligation to respond to emergency incidents consistent with the Fire Department emergency resource deployment and response time objectives may be impacted by circumstances and competing emergency needs, the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees shall have no duty to respond according to any specific response standard, and shall incur no liability whatsoever for failing to do so; therefore, Packet Page 153 of 463 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: The City Council of the City of Edmonds hereby adopts the response coverage document attached as Exhibit A as the Edmonds Fire Department's official policy for determining emergency medical, fire and rescue resource deployment; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: The adopted response coverage document officially defines the Edmonds Fire Department's written policies and procedures that establish the distribution and concentration of fixed and mobile resources of the department; and, This resolution was adopted at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the Edmonds City Council for the Edmonds Fire Department on November 28, 2006. RESOLVED this 28th day of November, 2006. APPROVED: Gary Haakenson MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED : Sandra S. Chase CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 11/22/06 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 11/28H06 RESOLUTION NO. 1133 Packet Page 154 of 463 SECTION 2 POLICY STATEMENTS The Fire Department maintains written policy statements that establishes the following: 1. The existence of the Fire Department is verified by Resolution No. 1133. X meets requirement does not meet 2. Services that the Fire Department is required to provide are addressed in Resolution No. 1133. X meets requirement does not meet 3. The basic organizational structure of the Fire Department is as depicted in the organizational chart adopted by Council as part of the 2006 budget on November 15, 2005, and the 2007-2008 budget adopted by Council on November 21, 2006. X meets requirement does not meet 4. The expected number of Fire Department employees for 2006 and 2007-2008 is 54 as adopted by Council as part of the 2006 budget on November 15, 2005, and the 2007-2008 budget adopted by Council on November 21, 2006. A breakdown by position appears in Appendix E. X meets requirement does not meet 5. The functions Fire Department employees are expected to perform are listed in Edmonds Fire Department SOP 501.01 Mission Statement. X meets requirement does not meet Packet Page 155 of 463 SECTION 3 STANDARDS OF RESPONSE COMPARISON (STANDARD OF COVER) To measure the ability to arrive and begin mitigation operations before the critical events of "brain death" or "flashover" occur, the Fire Departments is required to establish response time objectives, and compare the actual department results on an annual basis against the established objectives. The comparison begins in 2007 with a comparison of the established response objectives against actual 2006 response times for the levels of response. This section provides that comparison. 1. Turnout time for all emergency incidents Turnout Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a turn out time standard of 2:45, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did not meet the turn out time objective 90% of the time; 90% of the Fire Department incidents experienced a turn out time of 2:48 minutes/seconds. 2A. Response time off the first -arriving Engine Company to a fire suppression incident Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first engine company at a fire suppression incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of fire suppression incidents had the first engine arrive at the scene within 6:15 minutes/seconds of response time. 2B. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a residential fire suppression incident Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 7:45 for the arrival of the full complement of a first alarm response to a residential fire suppression incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. The Fire Department has adopted a first alarm response of 15 firefighters. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did not meet the full deployment response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of fire suppression incidents had the full deployment of first alarm responding personnel and equipment arrive at the scene within 11:42 minutes/seconds of response time. Packet Page 156 of 463 2C. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a commercial fire suppression incident Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 9 minutes for the arrival of the full complement of a first alarm response to a commercial fire suppression incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. The Fire Department has adopted a first alarm response of 18 firefighters. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did meet the full deployment response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of fire suppression incidents had the full deployment of first alarm responding personnel and equipment arrive at the scene within 9:00 minutes/seconds of response time. 3. Response time of the first -arriving unit with a first responder BLS, or higher level capability to an emergency medical incident Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 5:15 for the arrival of the first emergency medical unit with appropriately trained personnel on board (BLS) to an emergency medical incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did not meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of emergency medical incidents had the first -arriving first responder (BLS) arrive at the scene within 5:16 minutes/seconds of response time. 4. Response time for the arrival of an advanced life support (two Paramedics) unit to an emergency medical incident. Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 6:45 for the arrival of an advanced life support unit with appropriately trained personnel (two Paramedics) on board to an ALS emergency medical incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did not meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of emergency medical incidents had the Advance Life Support (two Paramedics) unit arrive at the scene within 6:49 minutes/seconds of response time. 5A1. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level personnel on board to a hazardous materials incident. Packet Page 157 of 463 Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level personnel on board to a hazardous materials incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did meet the response time objective 90% of the time. 90% of hazardous materials incidents had trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level personnel arrive at the scene within 6:15 minutes/seconds of response time. 5A2. Response time of the first -arriving pparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Technician level personnel on board to a hazardous materials incident. Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 12 minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Technician level personnel on board to a hazardous materials incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: No calls to report. 5B 1. Response time of the first -arriving pparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Technical Rescue Operations level personnel on board to a technical rescue incident. Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped Technical Rescue Operations level personnel on board to a technical rescue incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of technical rescue incidents had trained and equipped Technical Rescue Operations level personnel arrive at the scene within 6:15 minutes/seconds of response time. 5B2. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Technical Rescue Technician level personnel on board to a technical rescue incident. Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 12 minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped Technical Rescue Technician level personnel on board to a technical rescue incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Packet Page 158 of 463 Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of technical rescue incidents had trained and equipped Technical Rescue Technician level personnel arrive at the scene within 6:00 minutes/seconds of response time. 6. Response time of the first -arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and equipped Marine Rescue and Firefighting_ personnel on board to a marine incident. Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained and equipped Marine Rescue and Firefighting personnel on board to a marine incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time. Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2006: The Fire Department did meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of marine rescue or firefighting incidents had trained and equipped Marine Rescue and firefighting personnel arrive at the scene within 6:00 minutes/seconds of response time. Packet Page 159 of 463 SECTION 4 COUNCIL -ADOPTED STANDARDS NOT MET Substitute House Bill 1756, passed by the Washington Legislature in 2005, has been codified in Chapter 35A.92 RCW. Section 4 reporting is required by RCW 35A.92.040. RCW 35A.92.040(2)(a) requires the annual report to define the geographic areas covered by the report and the circumstances in which the requirements of the standards are not being met. The geographic area from which the response data for the report is drawn consists of the city/jurisdiction reporting category which is the legally adopted municipal boundaries of the City of Edmonds (8.93 square miles), and the Town of Woodway (1.12 square miles), and the unincorporated area known as Esperance (450 acres or .7 square miles). Edmonds has provided contract life safety and fire protection services to Woodway since at least 1984 and to Esperance since 1996. SHB 1756 requires an explanation when Council -adopted standards are not met, the predictable consequences of failing to meet the adopted standards, and the steps necessary to correct deficiencies in order to achieve compliance. Of the eleven individual response time performance standards identified by the Fire Department and approved by Council for evaluation, the four that were not met are addressed below. The response data was collected in 2006. Addressing the issue of time stamping by SNOCOM dispatchers used to compile data is addressed later in the Corrective Actions section of the report but bears notation at this time. The current method of time stamping is both approximate and conservative as time delays in recording occur when dispatchers are busy, and do not enter times in a timely manner resulting in inaccurate response data. For these reasons, actual time responses are not longer and in many cases shorter. Due to the very small time deviation in three of the four standards reported on below, what deviation there is may be attributable to recording delays by dispatchers. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS NOT MET The Council -adopted 2006 performance standards that were not met are as follows: 1. Turnout time for all emergency incidents Established: 2:45 Minutes/Seconds Actual: 2:48 Minutes/ Seconds 2B. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a residential fire suppression incident Established: 7:45 Minutes/Seconds Actual: 11:42 Minutes/seconds Packet Page 160 of 463 3. Response time of the first -arriving unit with a first responder (BLS) or higher level capability to an emergency medical incident Established: 5:15 Minutes/Seconds Actual: 5:16 Minutes/Seconds 4. Response time for the arrival of an advanced life support two Paramedics) unit to an emergency medical incident. Established: 6:45 Minutes/Seconds Actual: 6:49 Minutes/Seconds PREDICTABLE CONSEQUENCES Predictable consequences for the deficient standards above include the potential for greater deterioration in the patient/victim's medical condition, death, and increased property loss. Although response times are measurable as a risk factor, other inherent and varied risk factors that are less measurable also play a large role in outcomes, for example, time lapse between the onset of the emergency, discovery, and reporting; dispatch center processing; distance traveled; weather and road conditions; access; out - of -service / unavailable status of emergency units due to training, mechanical, or other emergencies; patients medical history and lifestyle; presence of bystanders able to assist; emergency devices that allow bystanders to assist; built-in fire detection and protection equipment; type of construction; and square footage. The list of variables that directly and indirectly influence the outcome of a specific emergency incident are not only numerous but come in various gradations and degrees. Despite the various factors that affect outcomes that are outside the control of emergency responders, response times are one factor in the medical chain -of -survival and structure fire time -temperature curve that governments can affect. Predictable consequences for the above standards are difficult to predict because the time difference is very small. Also, when working with a 90th percentile, only 10 percent of the emergency calls fail to meet the time standards. Deviations in time above the standard for all but one of the above standards were between one and four seconds. For the latter group, consequences are nearly impossible to predict and could be considered nebulous. At best, a mild increase in property loss could occur on fire -related responses, and a delay in treatment for medically -related incidents may occur. The greatest difference in time involves Section 2.B., the standard that requires assembling 15 Firefighters on a residential fire incident. In 2006, this totaled nine incidents. The Fire Department responded to a total of 59 residential structure fires in 2006, but only nine required assembly of 15 Firefighters. The remaining 50 incidents were handled by fewer Firefighters or the fire was extinguished prior to arrival. 2 Packet Page 161 of 463 As noted earlier, 15 Firefighters on an emergency incident is minimally sufficient to perform the necessary rescue and firefighting tasks. A fire call is a dynamic event and tasks and actions do not wait for all responding personnel to assemble, organize, and deploy. Rather, tasks are delegated as appropriate to the incident and available resources. The greatest predictable consequence for this standard is an increase in property dollar loss caused by delay in hose stream application and the ability to ventilate heated gases and fire from the building. Although a dollar amount is impossible to calculate, as many variables play in to predicting dollar loss, it is predictable that an increase in dollar loss will occur. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The following is a list of actions currently being implemented by the Fire Department to improve overall response times: 1. PNaing_ The emergency call notification from SNOCOM now comes via alpha- numeric paging devices assigned to each Fire Station. It is estimated that this sequence change will cut between one and five seconds from dispatch time, depending on the number of units being paged thus improving turnout time. The new system, implemented in May of this year, does not affect 2006 times, but should reduce 2007 response times. 2. Classroom Training: Training sites have been scrutinized and appropriate changes made. The past practice was for Fire Department personnel to assemble at Station 20 (Esperance) for classroom training primarily because it was the only station with a dedicated Training Room. The current Station 20 location is not the most optimal location from which to respond to calls. Beginning in April the Fire Department performs classroom training at two different sites: (1) the Public Works Facility on 72" d Avenue and 210th Street, a site more centrally located and adjacent to grids in the City that generate the most emergency calls; and (2) a reconfigured Station 17 where what was previously a Firefighter/Paramedic office has been turned into a classroom, Paramedics have been integrated into a room with multiple workstations near the public entry, and the Company Officer's office has been relocated to a smaller office off the hall. 3. MDCs - Mobile Data In -Vehicle Computers (MDCs). Currently, the Department relies on SNOCOM time -stamps done by dispatchers to record measurable response times. The Fire Department acquired MDCs for the majority of first response apparatus to ensure more accurate capture of actual response data. Fire MDCs, already mounted in apparatus, will be in full use when SNOCOM completes dispatcher training. 4. Awareness. At least quarterly Firefighters are made aware of the up-to-date turnout time standard. Being aware of the response time -standard gives Firefighters a heightened sense of the importance of being quick to respond in hopes of improving the overall turnout time. Packet Page 162 of 463 5. Purchase of Additional Protective Equipment. Edmonds Firefighters cross -staff two vehicles. Valuable time is wasted by transferring one set of fire suppression turnout ensemble (boots, bunker pants, bunker coat, gloves, hood and helmet) from Engine / Ladder to Aid Unit and back again depending on the type of call. Many seconds could be saved by issuing personnel two sets of gear, one for each piece of cross -staffed apparatus. Fire Administration will develop a decision package for the 2008-2009 biennial budget addressing a second set of turnouts for each Firefighter. Additionally, the Department has submitted a federal Assistance to Firefighters F.I.R.E. Grant for $111,000 this year to replace the turnout ensemble Department -wide which would allow the current gear to become the "second set" described above. 6. Field Trainingaptimal Fire Station Location. The Fire Department has an ad hoc committee evaluating the feasibility of a field training site in the immediate area where on -duty personnel can train without being placed out of service (unable to respond) or can rapidly return to service to respond to emergency incidents. Options to address this need include a stand-alone facility, or partnering with another area agency or agencies at an existing training site or development of a new site. Regardless of method, fulfilling this need is likely to be very expensive. NOTE: A training location with enough room for a co -located Fire Station would create a win -win for Firefighter field training and be the most advantageous response location, the latter among the most important factors affecting emergency response times. Four of the six corrective actions identified above have or are on their way to being accomplished at minimal cost. The new classroom training site at Station 17, though better than Station 20, is not optimal. Corrective actions five and six come at considerable expense, with the regular budget, EMS levy, and alternative revenue streams the logical funding sources. The Fire Department will continue the effort to reduce response times through the City budget, technology, regional partnerships, and/or other opportunities that present themselves. Packet Page 163 of 463 AM-1058 2.J. Authorization to Establish Part -Time Domestic Violence Coordinator Position Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Al Compaan Time: Consent Department: Police Department Type: Action Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Authorization to Establish Part -Time Domestic Violence Coordinator Position Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve establishing part-time DV Coordinator position. Previous Council Action Reviewed by Finance Committee on June 12, 2007, and approved for consent agenda. Narrative Since January 2004, the city of Edmonds and the city of Lynnwood by interlocal agreement have shared services of a Domestic Violence Coordinator. The incumbent is a full-time city of Lynnwood employee who has spent approximately 1/3 time here at Edmonds, with the balance at Lynr Lynnwood This allocation between Lynnwood and Edmonds was based originally on the number of domestic violence cases in each city. Representative duties are to provide coordination of domestic violence related cases between the victim, police department, prosecuting attorney's office and courts of jurisdiction. Additional duties include community education on domestic violence issues and training of department personnel relative to domestic violence. Work is performed in a support position for and within the police department in a civilian capacity. Our experience is that a Domestic Violence Coordinator can provide an effective level of service to DV victims, and to the overall prosecution effort, that is difficult to match absent such a designated person. Earlier this year, Lynnwood notified Edmonds that they (Lynnwood) were in need of the services of their Domestic Violence Coordinator on a full-time basis, therefore Lynnwood was requesting termination of the interlocal agreement between Lynnwood and Edmonds. Edmonds then undertook a search for a replacement of our own, as a 19 hour per week city of Edmonds employee who would be shared with the city of Mill Creek by interlocal. Based upon current caseload, Edmonds expects to utilize the new Domestic Violence Coordinator 2/3 of the time, and Mill Creek the remainder. The employee would be supervised by the Edmonds Police Department under Support Services. The police department is requesting authorization to establish this as a new 19 hour per week position with no benefits, hire date of June 20, 2007. We have an excellent candidate who is just completing background process. The position will be covered under the terms of the current Packet Page 164 of 463 Edmonds Police Officers' Association. Total hourly cost to fund this position is expected to be $23.35 per hour (employee will receive gross $20.85 per hour). Total cost to Edmonds on an annual basis per the 2007 labor agreement is $23,070.00, of which Mill Creek will pay 1/3. Given the fact we are requesting a June 20, 2007 hire date, total cost to Edmonds (and total revenue from Mill Creek per the interlocal) will be pro -rated through year end. Funding for this position is already provided for in the current General Fund Administrative Services Non -Departmental budget, $20,000 for 2007 and $21,000 for 2008. This level of funding is more than sufficient to cover Edmonds' costs for this position given the sharing with Mill Creek by interlocal. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: DV Coordinator Interlocal Link: DV Stats 2006 EPD LPD Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 02:29 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Al Started On: 06/14/2007 02:04 Compaan PM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 165 of 463 Interlocal Agreement Between City of Edmonds, Washington and City of Mill Creek, Washington for a Domestic Violence Coordinator This Interlocal Agreement, made and entered into on this day of 2007, by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Edmonds," and the CITY OF MILL CREEK, a Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Mill Creek," each party having been duly organized and now existing under the laws of the State of Washington. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds and the City of Mill Creek each require services of a Domestic Violence Coordinator to assist the Prosecutor and victims of domestic violence in each City; WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds is authorized by law to hire and retain an employee to provide domestic violence coordination services to assist victims and the City Prosecutor in domestic violence cases for the Municipal Court; WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds continues to require the domestic Violence Coordinator services for the benefit of the City of Edmonds; WHEREAS, Edmonds is amenable to allowing Mill Creek to compensate Edmonds in exchange for receiving services that will be performed by the Edmonds Domestic Violence Coordinator under the employment, direction and supervision of Edmonds; WHEREAS, RCW 39.34.080 and other Washington laws authorize any public agency to contract with another public agency to perform services and activities that each such public agency is authorized by law to perform; WHEREAS, Edmonds and Mill Creek have considered the costs for such services and skills required, and determined it is in each of their best interests to enter into this Agreement as authorized and provided for by RCW 39.34.080 and other Washington law to share such services in cooperation with each other; and WHEREAS, this Interlocal Agreement was authorized by the Edmonds City Council on 2007; 2007 and the Mill Creek City Council on NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and foregoing recitals, the payments to be made, the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: Draft 5/24/2007 Packet Page 166 of 463 1. Purpose: This Agreement is for Edmonds to provide the following services to Mill Creek (and as itemized further in Attachment A): a. The Domestic Violence Coordinator (hereinafter referred to as "DVC") is employed by Edmonds at all times, and is under the direction, supervision and control of Edmonds. b. In return for compensation, Edmonds shall direct the DVC to provide Mill Creek with services for approximately 33% of the total work time by the DVC at mutually agreed upon times and days. Both parties accept minor variation to the 66% of total estimated time to Edmonds or 3 3 % to Mill Creek. It is considered impractical to insure precise distribution due to the variation of workload requirements on any particular day, and distribution of holidays, sick leave and vacation days. C. As the employer, Edmonds shall provide an office and all supplies necessary for work. At the convenience of Mill Creek, Mill Creek may also provide an alternative workspace in Mill Creek. d. The DVC will work under Edmonds rules and directions. In the event that there is a conflict between Edmonds personnel activities and rules, and Mill Creek, then Edmonds shall prevail. 2. Duration: The duration of the agreement shall be for five years and may be renewed for successive periods of the same duration, upon approval by each respective City Council at time of each renewal. 3. Contacts: Notice regarding the contract terms, conditions, rates or other communications shall be addressed to: City of Edmonds Assistant Chief for Support Services (Al Compaan) 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 City of Mill Creek Chief Bob Crannell 15728 Main Street Mill Creek, WA 98012 4. Compensation from Mill Creek: a. For 2007, Mill Creek shall pay Edmonds an amount not to exceed $7,690.00 in monthly installments of $640.83 as billed to Mill Creek by Draft Packet Page 167 of 463 5/24/2007 Edmonds. Should the DVC position be vacant for a portion of the month, Edmonds shall pro -rate the invoice accordingly. Edmonds shall notify Mill Creek each year of any anticipated increase, and such increases, if any, shall be mutually agreed upon through Addendum to this contract. Such notice will be made as soon as practicable by Edmonds. b. Edmonds will send the monthly invoice to Chief Bob Crannell. C. Should Mill Creek require overtime services that require overtime pay under Edmonds rules, Edmonds shall pay the DVC and invoice Mill Creek for reimbursement as soon as such costs are known to Edmonds. 5. Record Keeping: Edmonds agrees to maintain records relative to the DVC employment, and to make such records available to Mill Creek upon request. 6. Indemnification and Insurance: Edmonds shall indemnify Mill Creek, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any claim, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees, arising from Edmonds' performance under this Agreement; provided, to the extent the claim, damages, losses and expenses are caused by intentional acts of or by the concurrent negligence of Mill Creek, its officers, agents or employees, Edmonds' indemnification obligation hereunder shall be limited to Edmonds' proportionate share of liability as agreed to by the parties to this Agreement or determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. 7. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated before expiration by written notice from either party. Termination by such notice shall become effective 90 days after receipt of notice. 8. Governing Law: The parties hereto agree that, except where expressly otherwise provided, the laws and administrative rules and regulations of the State of Washington shall govern in any matter relating to this Agreement. 9. Entire Agreement: This Agreement represents the entire integrated Interlocal Agreement between Edmonds and Mill Creek and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements on this matter, either written or oral. Draft Packet Page 168 of 463 5/24/2007 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above and foregoing Agreement has been executed in duplicate by the parties hereto and made effective on 2007. CITY OF EDMONDS Mayor Gary Haakenson ATTE S PAUTHENTICATED : Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney Draft 5/24/2007 CITY OF MILL CREEK LIN ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Packet Page 169 of 463 Attachment A A domestic violence coordinator is responsible for the coordination of domestic violence related cases between the victim, police department, prosecuting attorney's office and courts of jurisdiction. Additional duties include community education on domestic violence issues and training of department personnel relative to domestic violence. Work is performed in a support position for and within the police department in a civilian capacity. Essential Job Functions Includes but is not limited to the following: • Support, educate and assist victims of domestic violence through the criminal proceedings in municipal and superior courts; provide information regarding criminal justice procedures; appear with domestic violence victims at arraignments, pre -trail hearings, trials and other court hearings as deemed necessary. • Educate domestic violence victims regarding the benefits of prosecuting domestic violence cases. • Assess victim's immediate needs (i.e. safe housing, income, etc.); help victim develop a safety plan; provide information and referral to community resources, specifically domestic violence services. • Assist officers and detectives in obtaining evidence of domestic violence; take photographs of victim's injuries; research prior history of abuse; obtain medical records and document findings in accordance with departmental policy. • Provide domestic violence victims with information regarding filing for and obtaining civil protection orders. • Make recommendations in court and to the prosecuting attorney regarding no - contact orders; communicate with domestic violence victims seeking the termination of criminal no -contact orders; make charging and sentencing recommendations to the prosecuting attorney and court on behalf of victim. • Develop reference materials for use by court staff, prosecuting attorney and domestic violence victims. • Prepare statistical reports as directed; attend department staff meeting when requested. • Respond to telephone and walk-in requests for service; refer victims to social service or community agencies as appropriate. • Maintain case records; prepare required reports and other documents as required; assist in developing operational policies and procedures. • Assist in training department personnel relative to domestic violence. • Participate as directed in the domestic violence working group comprised of Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace police departments. Draft Packet Page 170 of 463 5/24/2007 Domestic Violence Statistics December 2006 YTD Statistics December EPD YTD December LPD YTD YTD Totals Gender: Female 14 135 35 427 562 Male 6 44 10 147 191 Race: White 17 156 31 433 589 Black 2 12 6 49 61 Asian 1 9 4 32 41 Hispanic 0 1 4 54 .55 Other 0 0 0 3 3 Age Range: <19 2 29 5 70 99 20-29 3 35 13 193 228 30-39 6 34 12 130 164 40-49 1 45 11 115 160 50-59 3 20 4 39 59 60+ 1 12 0 17 29 Children: Kids in House 7 63 21 233 296 Child Witness 4 40 16 135 175 Adult Witnesses: 17 111 19 248 359 Cases: Criminal Cases 26 184 57 586 770 Verbals 26 270 9 _ 166 436 # of New Victims: 22 164 45 497 661 Victims w/o Case: 0 9 0 10 19 Services Provided: Calls to V,W,D 43 665 211 2230 2895 Cnt W/Providers 37 526 87 982 1508 Email 18 467 89 1488 1955 In Person contact 7 106 23 224 330 Letters 12 24 14 26 50 Follow Up 6 55 16 131 186 Packet Page 171 of 463 AM-1056 Domestic Violence Coordinator Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mill Creek Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Debbie Smith Department: Police Department Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Tnfnrm atinn Time - Type: Subject Title Domestic Violence Coordinator Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mill Creek. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Recommend approval and authorize Mayor to sign. Previous Council Action 2.K. This was reviewed by the Finance Committee on June 12 with a recommendation for approval. Narrative This is an agreement to share the services of a Domestic Violence Coordinator between the cities of Mill Creek and Edmonds. Mill Creek will be billed monthly for the services provided by the employee. This employee is being hired by Edmonds PD to replace the outgoing, presently employed, Lynnwood DV coordinator. Fiscal Impact AttnebmPntc Link: Interlocal Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox 1 City Clerk 2 Mayor 3 Final Approval Form Started By: Debbie Smith Approved By Date Status Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 02:11 PM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Started On: 06/14/2007 01:33 PM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 172 of 463 Interlocal Agreement Between City of Edmonds, Washington and City of Mill Creek, Washington for a Domestic Violence Coordinator This Interlocal Agreement, made and entered into on this day of , 2007, by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Edmonds," and the CITY OF MILL CREEK, a Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Mill Creek," each party having been duly organized and now existing under the laws of the State of Washington. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds and the City of Mill Creek each require services of a Domestic Violence Coordinator to assist the Prosecutor and victims of domestic violence in each City; WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds is authorized by law to hire and retain an employee to provide domestic violence coordination services to assist victims and the City Prosecutor in domestic violence cases for the Municipal Court; WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds continues to require the domestic Violence Coordinator services for the benefit of the City of Edmonds; WHEREAS, Edmonds is amenable to allowing Mill Creek to compensate Edmonds in exchange for receiving services that will be performed by the Edmonds Domestic Violence Coordinator under the employment, direction and supervision of Edmonds; WHEREAS, RCW 39.34.080 and other Washington laws authorize any public agency to contract with another public agency to perform services and activities that each such public agency is authorized by law to perform; WHEREAS, Edmonds and Mill Creek have considered the costs for such services and skills required, and determined it is in each of their best interests to enter into this Agreement as authorized and provided for by RCW 39.34.080 and other Washington law to share such services in cooperation with each other; and WHEREAS, this Interlocal Agreement was authorized by the Edmonds City Council on , 2007 and the Mill Creek City Council on , 2007; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and foregoing recitals, the payments to be made, the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: Draft 5/24/2007 Packet Page 173 of 463 Purpose: This Agreement is for Edmonds to provide the following services to Mill Creek (and as itemized further in Attachment A): a. The Domestic Violence Coordinator (hereinafter referred to as "DVC") is employed by Edmonds at all times, and is under the direction, supervision and control of Edmonds. b. In return for compensation, Edmonds shall direct the DVC to provide Mill Creek with services for approximately 33% of the total work time by the DVC at mutually agreed upon times and days. Both parties accept minor variation to the 66% of total estimated time to Edmonds or 33% to Mill Creek. It is considered impractical to insure precise distribution due to the variation of workload requirements on any particular day, and distribution of holidays, sick leave and vacation days. C. As the employer, Edmonds shall provide an office and all supplies necessary for work. At the convenience of Mill Creek, Mill Creek may also provide an alternative workspace in Mill Creek. d. The DVC will work under Edmonds rules and directions. In the event that there is a conflict between Edmonds personnel activities and rules, and Mill Creek, then Edmonds shall prevail. 2. Duration: The duration of the agreement shall be for five years and may be renewed for successive periods of the same duration, upon approval by each respective City Council at time of each renewal. 3. Contacts: Notice regarding the contract terms, conditions, rates or other communications shall be addressed to: City of Edmonds Assistant Chief for Support Services (Al Compaan) 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 City of Mill Creek Chief Bob Crannell 15728 Main Street Mill Creek, WA 98012 4. Compensation from Mill Creek: a. For 2007, Mill Creek shall pay Edmonds an amount not to exceed $7,690.00 in monthly installments of $640.83 as billed to Mill Creek by Draft Packet Page 174 of 463 5/24/2007 Edmonds. Should the DVC position be vacant for a portion of the month, Edmonds shall pro -rate the invoice accordingly. Edmonds shall notify Mill Creek each year of any anticipated increase, and such increases, if any, shall be mutually agreed upon through Addendum to this contract. Such notice will be made as soon as practicable by Edmonds. b. Edmonds will send the monthly invoice to Chief Bob Crannell. C. Should Mill Creek require overtime services that require overtime pay under Edmonds rules, Edmonds shall pay the DVC and invoice Mill Creek for reimbursement as soon as such costs are known to Edmonds. 5. Record Keeping: Edmonds agrees to maintain records relative to the DVC employment, and to make such records available to Mill Creek upon request. 6. Indemnification and Insurance: Edmonds shall indemnify Mill Creek, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any claim, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees, arising from Edmonds' performance under this Agreement; provided, to the extent the claim, damages, losses and expenses are caused by intentional acts of or by the concurrent negligence of Mill Creek, its officers, agents or employees, Edmonds' indemnification obligation hereunder shall be limited to Edmonds' proportionate share of liability as agreed to by the parties to this Agreement or determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. 7. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated before expiration by written notice from either party. Termination by such notice shall become effective 90 days after receipt of notice. 8. Governing Law: The parties hereto agree that, except where expressly otherwise provided, the laws and administrative rules and regulations of the State of Washington shall govern in any matter relating to this Agreement. 9. Entire Agreement: This Agreement represents the entire integrated Interlocal Agreement between Edmonds and Mill Creek and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements on this matter, either written or oral. Draft Packet Page 175 of 463 5/24/2007 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above and foregoing Agreement has been executed in duplicate by the parties hereto and made effective on 2007. CITY OF EDMONDS LI-A Mayor Gary Haakenson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney CITY OF MILL CREEK an ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Draft Packet Page 176 of 463 5/24/2007 Attachment A A domestic violence coordinator is responsible for the coordination of domestic violence related cases between the victim, police department, prosecuting attorney's office and courts of jurisdiction. Additional duties include community education on domestic violence issues and training of department personnel relative to domestic violence. Work is performed in a support position for and within the police department in a civilian capacity. Essential Job Functions Includes but is not limited to the following: • Support, educate and assist victims of domestic violence through the criminal proceedings in municipal and superior courts; provide information regarding criminal justice procedures; appear with domestic violence victims at arraignments, pre -trail hearings, trials and other court hearings as deemed necessary. • Educate domestic violence victims regarding the benefits of prosecuting domestic violence cases. • Assess victim's immediate needs (i.e. safe housing, income, etc.); help victim develop a safety plan; provide information and referral to community resources, specifically domestic violence services. • Assist officers and detectives in obtaining evidence of domestic violence; take photographs of victim's injuries; research prior history of abuse; obtain medical records and document findings in accordance with departmental policy. • Provide domestic violence victims with information regarding filing for and obtaining civil protection orders. • Make recommendations in court and to the prosecuting attorney regarding no - contact orders; communicate with domestic violence victims seeking the termination of criminal no -contact orders; make charging and sentencing recommendations to the prosecuting attorney and court on behalf of victim. • Develop reference materials for use by court staff, prosecuting attorney and domestic violence victims. • Prepare statistical reports as directed; attend department staff meeting when requested. • Respond to telephone and walk-in requests for service; refer victims to social service or community agencies as appropriate. • Maintain case records; prepare required reports and other documents as required; assist in developing operational policies and procedures. • Assist in training department personnel relative to domestic violence. • Participate as directed in the domestic violence working group comprised of Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace police departments. Draft Packet Page 177 of 463 5/24/2007 AM-1059 Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Al Compaan Time: Consent Department: Police Department Type: Action Review Committee: Public Safety Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force, FY 2007-2008. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve interlocal agreement and authorize mayor to sign. Previous Council Action Reviewed by Public Safety Committee on June 12, 2007. Approved for consent agenda. Narrative 2.L. Since January 1988, the City of Edmonds and other Snohomish County cities have been participants in the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force (SRDTF) with offices in Everett. Edmonds was one of the original participants, contributing a detective and equipment to the unit. In more recent years, Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace established the South Snohomish County Narcotics Task Force (SSCNTF). Since the creation of the SSCNTF, Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace have chosen to continue their support of the SRDTF through financial contribution alone. Edmonds presently has a detective assigned to the SSCNTF. The SRDTF receives the majority of its funding through a U.S. Department of Justice grant. The grant amount is based on the number and population of municipalities that participate in the SRDTF. The required matching funds for the federal grant come from Snohomish County and the participating municipalities. For fiscal year 2007-2008, nineteen municipalities, plus Snohomish County, are pledging matching funds to the SRDTF. Edmonds' share for July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008 is $9,279.00, a $165.00 increase over last year's share. Funding for this item is included in the 2007-2008 Edmonds Police budget. The interlocal agreement, and the funding received from participating entities, sets forth the operational framework for the SRDTF, and has done so since 1988. The SRDTF and SSCNTF work very closely and assist each other with staffing and equipment, as needed. For example, should we encounter a drug lab locally the SRDTF can be called out to dismantle the lab. This assistance can save us literally thousands of dollars in overtime, training and equipment expense. A more frequent area of cooperation and assistance occurs with investigations where the two task forces may assist each other with investigations involving mutual Packet Page 178 of 463 suspects. Fiscal Impact Ricrnl VPar- Revenue• Expenditure: Fiscal Impact: Amount budgeted in approved 2007-2008 general fund Police Department budget. Attachments Link: Interlocal Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 02:29 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:55 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Al Started On: 06/14/2007 02:15 Compaan PM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 179 of 463 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING SNOHOMISH REGIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE This Interlocal Agreement is among Snohomish County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the following jurisdictions (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Participating Jurisdictions"): City of Arlington City of Bothell City of Brier City of Darrington City of Edmonds City of Everett City of Gold Bar City of Granite Falls City of Index City of Lake Stevens City of Lake Forest Park City of Lynnwood City of Marysville Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 1 City of Mill Creek City of Monroe City of Mountlake Terrace City of Mukilteo City of Snohomish City of Stanwood City of Sultan DSHS, Child Protective Services Sauk Suiattle Tribe Snohomish Health District Stillaguamish Tribe Tulalip Tribes Washington State Patrol Packet Page 180 of 463 WITNESSES THAT: WHEREAS, the State of Washington Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development (hereinafter "CTED"), has received funds from the U.S. Department of Justice under authority of the Anti -Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to provide grants to local units of government for drug law enforcement; and WHEREAS, eligible applicants include cities, counties and Indian tribes; and WHEREAS, RCW 39.34 permits one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity, or undertaking that each public agency is authorized by law to perform; and WHEREAS, Snohomish County and CTED have entered into a Narcotics Control Grant Contract (hereinafter "Grant Contract") whereby Snohomish County shall use specified grant funds solely for a regional task force project consistent with the task force grant application submitted to CTED on or before June 1, 2007, upon which the Grant Contract is based (by this reference both the Grant Contract and the grant application are incorporated in this agreement as though set forth fully herein); and WHEREAS, the Participating Jurisdictions recognize the above -mentioned Grant Contract between CTED and Snohomish County; and WHEREAS, the Participating Jurisdictions desire to participate as members of the multi jurisdictional task force with Snohomish County administering task force project grants on their behalf, and WHEREAS, the Participating Jurisdictions desire to enter into an agreement with Snohomish County to enable Snohomish County to continue to be the receiver of any grant funds related to the task force project; and WHEREAS, each of the Participating Jurisdictions represented herein is authorized to perform each service contemplated for it herein; Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 2 Packet Page 181 of 463 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants, conditions, performances and promises hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 TASK FORCE CONTINUATION, TERM, AND PURPOSE 1.1 The countywide multi jurisdictional task force, composed of law enforcement, prosecutor, and support personnel, known as the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force (hereinafter "Task Force") was created pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement Among Participating Jurisdictions dated January 18, 1988. The Task Force has operated on a continuous basis since that time under a series of Interlocal agreements, the most recent effective from July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007. This agreement shall serve to continue the operation of the Task Force. 1.2 The effective date of this agreement shall be from July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2008, unless earlier terminated or modified as provided in this agreement. 1.3 The purpose of the Task Force shall be to formally structure and jointly coordinate selected law enforcement activities, resources, and functions in order to disrupt illegal drug trafficking systems and to remove traffickers through a cooperative program of investigation, prosecution, and asset forfeiture. 1.4 The Task Force agrees to perform the statement of work indicated in the Task Force Abstract set forth in the application for funding between CTED and Snohomish County. Therefore each participating jurisdiction adopts the following Task Force goals: • Continue to attack the demand and supply sides of narcotics trafficking. • Continue enforcement efforts directed toward mid and upper level dealers. Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 3 Packet Page 182 of 463 • Continue to assist smaller agencies within Snohomish County with narcotics enforcement within their towns and cities. • Continue to provide narcotics enforcement training to smaller jurisdictions throughout Snohomish County. 1.5 The Task Force shall continue to follow a management system for the shared coordination and direction of personnel as well as financial, equipment and technical resources as stated in this agreement. 1.6 The Task Force shall continue to implement operations, including: a. Development of intelligence b. Target identification c. Investigation d. Arrest of Suspects e. Successful prosecution of offenders, and f. Asset forfeiture/disposition 1.7 The Task Force shall evaluate and report on Task Force performance to CTED as required in the Grant Contract. 2.0 ORGANIZATION 2.1 The Task Force shall be organized as shown below: TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION CHART Snohomish County Sheriff Chiefs of Police Everett City Snohomish County Prosecutor Prosecuting Atty. Deputy Prosecutor I Secretary J Task Force J Executive: Board Task Force Commander I Sergeant f Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page Police Officers Packet Page 183 of 463 2.2 The Task Force Executive Board shall be comprised of the Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney, the Snohomish County Sheriff, the Everett Police Chief, the Everett City Prosecutor, and one (1) chief of police from the remaining Participating Jurisdictions chosen by the chiefs of police of the remaining Participating Jurisdictions. The Snohomish County Sheriff shall serve as Chair of the Executive Board. The Task Force Executive Board may adopt bylaws providing for appointment of alternates to attend Executive Board meetings in the absence of members. At such meetings the alternate shall have the same rights as the appointing member. Any action taken by the Task Force Executive Board under this agreement shall be based on a majority vote. 2.3 All law enforcement personnel assigned to the Task Force shall be directed in their Task Force duties by the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office (SCSO) through the Task Force Commander. The Task Force Commander will be an employee of Snohomish County for all purposes and, if not a regular SCSO deputy, will hold a special commission for that purpose. 2.4 Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by this reference, sets forth the personnel and related equipment and supplies currently assigned to the Task Force by each Participating Jurisdiction. Nothing in this agreement shall restrict the ability of the Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney, Snohomish County Sheriff, Everett Police Chief, or chief law enforcement officer of any Participating Jurisdiction to reassign personnel and related equipment and supplies now or later assigned to the Task Force. Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 5 Packet Page 184 of 463 3.0 FINANCING 3.1 Exhibit `B" sets forth the Task Force operating budget and is incorporated herein by reference. Participating Jurisdictions in the aggregate agree to provide funds that will allow for at least a one-third match of the funds awarded under the Grant Contract. 3.2 Exhibit "C" sets forth the Local Match breakdown for the period from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2008, and is incorporated herein by reference. Although State and/or Federal Grant funds may vary from the amount initially requested, each Participating Jurisdiction agrees to provide funding that is no less than the amount indicated in Exhibit "C", and to pay its funding share to Snohomish County as administrator of Task Force funds promptly upon request. 3.3 As required by the Grant Contract, each Participating Jurisdiction agrees the funding it contributes shall be provided in addition to that currently appropriated to narcotics enforcement activities and that no Task Force activity will supplant or replace any existing narcotic enforcement activities. 3.4 Except as modified by section 5.3 below, all revenues collected or generated by or for the Task Force shall be forwarded to the Snohomish County Treasurer and placed in a designated special account for the purpose of supporting Task Force operations, and all real or personal property of the Task Force will be held in Snohomish County's name for the benefit of the Task Force. 3.5 Upon termination of the Task Force, all funds remaining in said special account shall be disbursed pro rata to the then -current Participating Jurisdictions in proportion to the percentage of their most recent financial participation as indicated in Exhibit "C". Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 6 Packet Page 185 of 463 4.0 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 4.1 Snohomish County agrees to provide CTED with the necessary documentation to receive grant funds. 4.2 By executing this agreement, each Participating Jurisdiction agrees to make any certified assurances required by the Grant Contract that are within its particular control, and agrees to make all its records related to the Task Force available for inspection consistent with the Grant Contract. 4.3 All Task Force contracts and agreements executed on behalf of Participating Jurisdictions under this agreement must first be approved on motion of the Task Force Executive Board. By executing this agreement, each Participating Jurisdiction agrees that, for the purpose of administering the assets and resources available to the Task Force, Snohomish County is hereby granted the authority to execute on behalf of the Participating Jurisdictions all agreements and contracts signed as approved by the Task Force Executive Board, by and through its Chair, including but not limited to all contracts for professional services. Agreements and contracts executed in this manner shall have the same legal effect as if they were executed by each Participating Jurisdiction. No such agreement or contract may impose or waive liability with respect to a Participating Jurisdiction in a manner that is inconsistent with the hold harmless provision in section 10.0 of this agreement. 4.4 Any dispute arising under this agreement will be forwarded to the Task Force Executive Board for arbitration. The determination made by the Executive Board shall be final and conclusive as between the parties. This provision shall not apply to issues of indemnity and liability Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 7 Packet Page 186 of 463 governed by the hold harmless provision in section 10.0 of this agreement. 5.0 ASSET FORFEITURE 5.1 The Participating Jurisdictions shall refer all potential asset forfeitures initiated or investigated by officers assigned to the Task Force during the pendency of this agreement to the Task Force for disposition at the discretion of the Task Force Executive Board or prosecuting authority (Prosecuting Attorney or United States Attorney). Any such referred asset forfeiture that is pursued in state court will be prosecuted in the name of Snohomish County on behalf of the Task Force and its Participating Jurisdictions. 5.2 The Task Force Commander, under the direction of the Task Force Executive Board, shall manage the acquisition and disposition of assets seized or forfeited as a result of this agreement in compliance with law and Task Force Procedures. 5.3 A portion of the net monetary proceeds of each asset forfeiture made by the Task Force shall be distributed to the involved investigating agencies commensurate with their participation as determined by prior agreement between the Task Force Commander and said agencies, or in the absence of such agreement, by the Task Force Executive Board, prior to dedication of the remaining proceeds to the Task Force as specified in section 3.4. As long as the personnel, equipment, and related supply assignments stated in Exhibit "A" remain unchanged, distributions to Snohomish County and the City of Everett under this subparagraph shall be 40 percent each of the net monetary proceeds remaining after distributions under this subparagraph to Participating Jurisdictions other than Snohomish County and the City of Everett. If assignments change Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 8 Packet Page 187 of 463 from those stated in Exhibit "A", the Task Force Executive Board may modify the relative percentage allocations to Snohomish County and the City of Everett on a case -by -case or permanent basis. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "net monetary proceeds" means cash proceeds realized from property forfeited during the term of this agreement that is not retained for use by the Task Force after deducting all costs and expenses incurred in its acquisition, including but not limited to the cost of satisfying any bona fide security interest to which the property may be subject at the time of seizure, the cost of sale in the case of sold property (including reasonable fees or commissions paid to independent selling agencies), amounts paid to satisfy a landlord's claim for damages, and the amount of proceeds (typically ten percent) payable to the State of Washington under RCW 69.50.505(9) or similar law. 5.4 Any Participating Jurisdiction receiving a distribution of assets forfeited under RCW 69.50.505 shall use such assets in accordance with RCW 69.50.505(10), which limits use to the expansion and improvement of controlled substances related law enforcement activity and prohibits use to supplant preexisting funding sources. 5.5 Upon termination of the Task Force, the Task Force Executive Board shall dispose of the Task Force's interest in assets seized or forfeited as a result of this agreement in accordance with applicable federal, state and county requirements, and shall distribute proceeds in accordance with sections 5.3 and 3.5. 6.0 ACQUISITION AND USE OF EQUIPMENT 6.1 In the event that any equipment is acquired with grant funds, the Participating Jurisdictions agree that the Task Force will use that Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 9 Packet Page 188 of 463 equipment only for specified law enforcement purposes for the term of the grant. 6.2 Upon termination of the Task force, any equipment provided by Participating Jurisdictions will be returned to those respective jurisdictions. 6.3 Upon termination of the Task Force, the Task Force Executive Board shall dispose of all acquired equipment in accordance with applicable federal, state and county requirements, and shall distribute proceeds in accordance with section 3.5. 7.0 MODIFICATION 7.1 Participating Jurisdictions hereto reserve the right to amend this agreement in the future from time to time as may be mutually agreed upon. No such amendment shall be effective unless written and signed by all then -contributing jurisdictions with the same formality as this agreement. 8.0 NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISION 8.1 There shall be no discrimination against any employee who is paid by the grant funds or against any applicant for such employment because of race, color, religion, handicap, marital status, political affiliation, sex, age, or national origin. This provision shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, advertising, lay-off or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training. 9.0 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 9.1 Notwithstanding any provisions of this agreement, any party may withdraw from the agreement as it pertains to them by providing written notice of such withdrawal to all other parties, specifying the effective Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 10 Packet Page 189 of 463 date thereof at least thirty (30) days prior to such date. A withdrawing party may take with it any equipment it has loaned or donated to the Task Force, and shall be entitled to distributions under section 5.3 of this agreement with respect to asset forfeitures initiated before the effective date of withdrawal. 9.2 If there is a reduction in funds by the source of those funds, and if such funds are the basis of this agreement, Snohomish County may unilaterally terminate all or part of the agreement, or may reduce its scope of work and budget. 10.0 HOLD HARMLESS 10.1 Each party hereto agrees to save, indemnify, defend and hold the other parties harmless from any allegations, complaints, or claims of wrongful and/or negligent acts or omissions, by said party and/or its officers, agents, or employees to the fullest extent allowed by law. In the case of allegations, complaints, or claims against more than one party, any damages allowed shall be levied in proportion to the percentage of fault attributable to each party, and each party shall have the right to seek contribution from each of the other parties in proportion to the percentage of fault attributable to each of the other parties. Moreover, the parties agree to cooperate and jointly defend any such matter to the extent allowed by law. An agency that has withdrawn assumes no responsibility for the actions of the remaining members arising after the date of withdrawal, but shall remain liable for claims of loss or liability arising prior to the effective date of withdrawal. 10.2 The Tulalip Tribes waives sovereign immunity to suit by any party to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement. The parties agree that in enforcing obligations under this Agreement, a party seeking payment Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 11 Packet Page 190 of 463 from the Tulalip Tribes shall look first to the proceeds of any insurance procured by the Tribes for this purpose. Should any claim exceed the limit of procured insurance arising from the entry of a final decree in any court, or by settlement of a civil action mutually agreed to by a party to this Agreement and the Tribes, the Tribes hereby waives any claim of immunity or exemption for any assets it holds up to the amount necessary to discharge the obligation and the costs of collection. 10.3 The Sauk Suiattle Tribe waives sovereign immunity to suit by any party to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement. The parties agree that in enforcing obligations under this Agreement, a party seeking payment from the Sauk Suiattle Tribe shall look first to the proceeds of any insurance procured by the Tribe for this purpose. Should any claim exceed the limit of procured insurance arising from the entry of a final decree in any court, or by settlement of a civil action mutually agreed to by a party to this Agreement and the Tribe, the Tribe hereby waives any claim of immunity or exemption for any assets it holds up to the amount necessary to discharge the obligation and the costs of collection. 10.4 The Stillaguamish Tribe waives sovereign immunity to suit by any party to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement. The parties agree that in enforcing obligations under this Agreement, a party seeking payment from the Stillaguamish Tribe shall look first to the proceeds of any insurance procured by the Tribe for this purpose. Should any claim exceed the limit of procured insurance arising from the entry of a final decree in any court, or by settlement of a civil action mutually agreed to by a party to this Agreement and the Tribe, the Tribe hereby waives any claim of immunity or exemption for any assets it holds up to the amount necessary to discharge the obligation and the costs of collection. Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 12 Packet Page 191 of 463 11.0 GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE 11.1 This agreement shall be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington without reference to choice of law principles, and venue of any suit between the parties arising out of this agreement shall be in the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington. 12.0 INTEGRATION 12.1 With the exception of necessary operational agreements between law enforcement agencies of the Participating Jurisdictions and agreements pursuant to section 5.3 hereof, this agreement constitutes the whole and entire agreement among those parties as to the Task Force and no other understandings, oral, or otherwise, regarding the Task Force shall be deemed to exist or bind the parties. 13.0 EXECUTION OF MULTIPLE ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS 13.1 This agreement may be reproduced in any number of original counterparts. Each party need sign only one counterpart and when the signature pages are all assembled with one original counterpart, that compilation constitutes a fully executed and effective agreement among all the Participating Jurisdictions. In the event that fewer than all named parties execute this agreement, the agreement, once recorded as specified in section 15.0, shall be effective as between the parties that have executed the agreement to the same extent as if no other parties had been named. 14.0 SEVERABILITY 14.1 If any part of this agreement is unenforceable for any reason the remainder of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force — Page 13 Packet Page 192 of 463 15.0 RECORDING 15.1 This interlocal agreement will be recorded in compliance with RCW 39.34.040. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, approved at the direction of the County Council. Aaron Reardon County Executive DATE: ATTEST: APPROVAL RECONEMENDED: Robert R. Bart, Sheriff Date: Interlocal Agreement Establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Taste Force — Page 14 Packet Page 193 of 463 EXHIBIT A Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force Personnel and Basic Equipment Assigned by Jurisdiction July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008 EVERETT POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 Lieutenant Nextel phone 1 Sergeant Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel phone 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel phone 1 Support Personnel Nextel phone ARLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry BOTHELL POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 1 Task Force Commander Nextel phone 1 Lieutenant Nextel phone I Sergeant Nextel phone 1 Detective Blackberry I Detective Blackberry I Detective Nextel phone 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry I Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry I Support Staff Nextel phone 1 Support Staff Nextel phone SNOHOMISH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE I Deputy Prosecutor Nextel/Blackberry 1 Deputy Prosecutor Blackberry 1 Support Staff Nextel phone 1 Deputy Prosecutor Nextel phone FUNDING Pager Everett PD Everett PD Pager Everett PD Pager Everett PD Pager Everett PD Pager Everett PD Pager Everett PD Pager Everett PD Everett PD FUNDING Justice Assistance Grant FUNDING Pager Marysville PD FUNDING Bothell PD I ��1►D71►�C� Justice Assistance Grant Pager Snohomish County Sheriff Pager Snohomish County Sheriff Snohomish County Sheriff Snohomish County Sheriff Pager Snohomish County Sheriff Pager Snohomish County Sheriff Pager Snohomish County Sheriff Pager Snohomish County Sheriff Snohomish County Sheriff Snohomish County Sheriff Justice Assistance Grant Snohomish County Sheriff FUNDING Justice Assistance Grant Snohomish County Prosecutor Snohomish County Sheriff Snohomish County Prosecutor Page 15 Packet Page 194 of 463 STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 Detective Nextel/Blackberry 1 Case Worker Nextel/Blackberry SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Local Health Officer Nextel phone WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD 1 Intelligence Analyst Nextel phone BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO AND FIREARMS 1 Agent pager DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 1 Agent Nextel/Blackberry pager RvMGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT 1 Agent Nextel/Blackberry pager 0.5 Agent FUNDING Washington State Patrol DSHS, Child Protective Services FUNDING Snohomish Health District FUNDING Washington National Guard FUNDING ATF FUNDING Drug Enforcement Agency FUNDING Immigration And Customs Enforcement Immigration And Customs Enforcement Page 16 Packet Page 195 of 463 EXHIBIT B Snohomish Regional Drue Task Force Estimated Operating Budget for July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008 FEDERAL LOCAL FUNDS MATCH TOTALS Salaries 109,518 153,876 263,394 Benefits 27,733 38,965 66,698 Contracted Services 75,247 105,725 180,972 Goods and Services 2,079 2,921 5,000 Training 2,079 2,921 5,000 Equipment 0 0 0 Confidential Funds 0 0 0 TOTALS $16,656 $304,408 * $ 521,064 *$154,721 from Local Matching Funds; $149,687 from Forfeited Assets Fund Page 17 Packet Page 196 of 463 EXHIBIT C Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force Local Match Breakdowns for July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008 JURISDICTION POPULATION PERCENTAGE AMOUNT Arlington 15430 2.30% $ 3,547.00 Bothell 15090 2.25% $ 3,469.00 Brier 6480 0.96% $ 1,490.00 Darrington 1465 0.22% $ 337.00 Edmonds 40360 6.01% $ %279.00 Everett 101100 15.05% $ 23,243.00 GoldBar 2125 0.32% $ 489.00 GraniteFalls 3095 0.46% $ 712.00 Index 155 0.02% $ 36.00 LakeStevens 12000 1.44% $ 2,219.00 LakeForestPark 0 0 $ 0 Lynnwood 35230 5.24% $ 8,099.00 Marysville 32150 4.79% $ 7,391.00 MillCreek 17460 2.60% $ 4,014.00 Monroe 16170 2.41% $ 3,717.00 MountlakeTerrace 20390 3.04% $ 4,688.00 Mukilteo 19620 2.92% $ 4,511.00 Snohomish 8920 1.33% $ 2,051.00 SnohomishCounty 316365 47.09% $ 72,729.00 Stanwood 4940 0.74% $ 1,136.00 Sultan 4440 0.66% $ 1,021.00 DSHS,CPS 0.00000 $ 0 SaukSuiattleTribe 0.00000 $ 0 SnohomishHealthDistrict 0.00000 $ 0 StillaguamishTribe 0.00000 $ 0 TulalipTribes 0.00000 $ 0 WashingtonStatePatrol 0.00000 $ 0 PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS' TOTALS: $ 154,721 fnterlocal Agreement Page 18 Packet Page 197 of 463 ATTEST: APPROVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION: Title ATTEST: Jurisdiction Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jurisdiction Attorney Dated Jurisdiction of ORIGINAL (if printed in blue) Dated Dated Packet Page 198 of 463 AM-1045 Purchasing Agreement for Office Supplies and Equipment Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase Time: Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Consent Action 04W Subiect Title Approval of Purchasing Agreement for Office Supplies and Equipment with Office Max "America Saves" Program. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council approve the City of Edmonds entering into a Purchasing Agreement for Office Supplies and Equipment with Office Max "America Saves" Program. Previous Council Action Formal bids for the Office Supplies and Furnishings Purchasing Agreement were received in July 2004, and the contract was awarded to Boise (now doing business under the name Office Max). The contract expires July 31, 2007. The Finance Committee reviewed this matter on June 12, 2007 and recommended placing approval of the Agreement on the Consent Agenda. Narrative When the bid documents were prepared in mid-2004 for the Office Supplies & Furnishings Purchasing Agreement, the estimated value of the contract was $125,000. As noted below, there has been a cost savings with Office Max. In 2005, the total amount purchased from Office Max (including tax) was $81,474.75, and in 2006, the total amount purchased was $90,274.08. Request to Enter into a Purchasing Agreement for Office Supplies and Equipment Office Max now has a program that has made it possible for government agencies to realize benefits and cost savings in the acquisition of office supplies by participating in a membership purchasing program. By entering into this agreement, there is an opportunity to obtain additional savings through lower contract pricing and incentives. It will also allow for savings by eliminating the time and costs associated with the bidding process. Office Max was awarded a competitively quoted agreement in 2006 with Oakland County, Michigan, for office supplies and equipment. The contractor, in an additional agreement with Oakland County, extended the pricing in their mutual Master Agreement to other participating Packet Page 199 of 463 government agencies through a program known as "America Saves." The program extends the cost benefits in the Master Agreement to participating agencies throughout the United States. The Master Agreement expires May 31, 2009. There are 300 agencies using the program to date, with $16,000,000 in purchases via America Saves in 2006. Highlights of the agreement: —12,000 Item Catalog: Office Supplies, Paper, Furniture, Technology, Janitorial Supplies and Copy Solutions. —300 Item Core List that is aggressively priced. —All other items: Discounts up to 85% Incentives: eCommerce Rebate, Volume Incentive Savings, Prompt Pay Savings & Conversion Rebate A comparison of the City of Edmonds current contract pricing on 25 items used to determine the original award of the bid to Office Max with the contract pricing available under America Saves, shows there would be a 7% savings. Incentives and Possible Cost Savings to the City of Edmonds Based on Current Levels: Volume incentive = The savings to the City of Edmonds would be $0. eCommerce rebate = Rebate of $832 Conversion Allowance = Rebate of $720 Prompt Pay Savings = $1,664 Contract Item Reduction & Contract Item Additions Savings = $3,884 Non Contract Enhancement Savings = $8,471 Total of Rebates and Pricing Reductions Savings = $15,571 or 20.3% Another local entity who is using the "America Saves" contract is the City of Kent. I contacted the City of Kent to ask about their experience with the program. Kent made the decision to enter into the Interlocal for two reasons: (1) They were short staffed and did not have the time or staffing to go through the bid process, and (2) the savings that were quoted. They noticed the biggest savings in the price of paper. They currently pay paper prices at the rate they were paying in 2003 which has been a huge savings. In addition, they receive a rebate once a year; the rebate alone saved $2,000 to $3,000. They indicate the transition to America Saves has been seamless. They indicate "America Saves" is a great program and they have no regrets. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: America Saves Analysis Link: America Saves Program Link: Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:40 PM APRV Packet Page 200 of 463 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 02:53 PM APRV Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:18 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Started On: 06/13/2007 01:42 Chase PM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 201 of 463 City Of Edmonds America Saves Analysis • Volume Incentive: Savings=$0 — If your local government office purchases up to $500,000 from OfficeMax in one calendar year, you will receive a reimbursement equal to 0.5% of the sales volume. — If your local government office purchases over $500,000 from OfficeMax in one calendar year, you will receive a reimbursement equal to 1.0% of the sales volume. — If your local government office purchases over $1,000,000 from OfficeMax in one calendar year, you will receive a reimbursement equal to 2% of the sales volume. • E-Com Rebate : Rebate $832 o If >75% of sales processed via E-commerce, pay a reimbursement equal to 1.0% of total sales volume. • Conversion Allowance: Rebate=$720 — We will pay 5% of the 1st 60 day's sales to new entities that join the "America Saves" program via OfficeMax. This will help offset any costs of moving to a new vendor. • Prompt Pay: Savings=$1,664 — 2%/10 net 30 EFT terms on Daily Billing — No EFT ... no prompt pay discount • Contract Item Reduction & Contract Item Additions : Savings=$3,884 • Non -contract enhancement: Savings=$8,471 • Total of Rebates and Pricing reductions: Savings=$15,571 or 20.3% Packet Page 202 of 463 E AMERICA SAVES!!!!!! Goal?: America Saves = Time & Money Savings. OfficeMax Packet Page 203 of 463 Agenda • Who is OfficeMax? • What is America Saves? • Program Highlights • Who Chose America Saves? • Testimonials OfficeMax- Packet Page 204 of 463 Who is OfficeMax? • Office Supplies, Paper, Technology, Office Furniture & Impress • 2005 sales: $9.1 billion • 30 U.S. Distribution Centers • OfficeMax Trucks and Drivers • 900 Retail Stores BENEFIT: Best Price and Service OfficeMax =J Packet Page 205 of 463 What is America Saves? Competitively quoted agreement 2006 Oakland County, Michigan Largest County in Michigan $1,000,000 Purchases Provides leveraged volume pricing Ability for counties, cities etc.. to " attach" onto the agreement legally OfficeMax Packet Page 206 of 463 Highlights of the Agreement • 12,000 Item Catalog: Office Supplies, Paper, Furniture, Technology, Janitorial Supplies and Copy Solutions • 300 Item Core List: Very Aggressively Priced - Member Unique pricing a vai/ab/e • All other items: Discounts up to 85% • Incentives: — Internet Ordering, Volume, Prompt Pay & Conversion BENEFIT: Save $ With Little Effort. OfficeMax Packet Page 207 of 463 Volume Incentive • Volume Incentive: — If your local government office purchases up to $500,000 from OfficeMax in one calendar year, you will receive a reimbursement equal to 0.5% of the sales volume. — If your local government office purchases over $500,000 from OfficeMax in one calendar year, you will receive a reimbursement equal to 1.0% of the sales volume. — If your local government office purchases over $1,000,000 from OfficeMax in one calendar year, you will receive a reimbursement equal to 2% of the sales volume. Off%@ ficeMax Packet Page 208 of 463 Electronic Commerce — If > 75% of sales processed via ecom merce, pay a reimbursement equal to 1.0% of total sales volume. OfficeMax Packet Page 209 of 463 Rebate Continued • Conversion Allowance: — We will pay 5% of the 1st 60 day's sales to new entities that join the "America Saves" program via OfficeMax. This will help offset any costs of moving to a new vendor. • Prompt Pay: — 2%/10 net 30 EFT on Daily Billing OfficeMax Packet Page 210 of 463 Who Chose "America Saves"? - 300 Agencies Using the Program to Date. - $16,000,000 purchases via America Saves in 2006 - 2005 first full year of program - 29 States Have Local Agencies Linked - Range of Agencies Using the Program - K-12 Schools - Cities - Counties - Community Colleges OfficeMax Packet Page 211 of 463 Testimonial #1 The America Saves Program, offered to us here at Clinton County through Officemax, has proven to be very successful to us in many ways. As we have centralized purchasing and it is very time consuming to order office supplies for all of our departments, this program has allowed us to consolidate our resources which have resulted in some great time savings. Also, as many of our yearly bid items are on this program, the amount of items on the bid has been greatly reduced, saving time and effort as well. The quarterly rebates we receive for utilizing the program have been substantial and help to reduce our operating cost, saving even more money. Off iceMax Kimberly A. Currier Purchasing Agent Clinton County Packet Page 212 of 463 Testimonial #2 To Whom it May Concern: ....made an appointment to talk with me and my secretary about opening an America Saves account with OfficeMax... I am very satisfied with the quality of goods we purchase, their timely delivery.... Besides outstanding service, OfficeMax's prices help us get more for our money. Algott Herman Director of Student Services W. Carrollton School District Off iceMax Packet Page 213 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE O KLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION OAKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION BY AND, BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND OFFICEMAX CONTRACT, INC. Contract Number: 001260 Contract Expiration Date: May 31, 2009 Contract - NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT: $4 000 000.00 This "Contract" is made between the COUNTY OF OAKLAND, a Michigan Constitutional Corporation, hereinafter called "County", and the "Contractor" as further described in the following Table. In this Contract, either Contractor or the County may also be referred to individually as a "Party" or jointly as the "Parties". COUNTY OF OAKLAND OfficeMax Contract Inc. Products Corporation 1200 N. Telegraph Road 13301 Stephens Road Pontiac, MI 48341-0047 Warren, Michigan 48089 (herein, the "County") Vendor No. 000987 (herein the "Contractor") This Contract is organized and divided into the following "Section" or "Sections" for the convenience of the Parties. SECTION 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND DEFINITIONS AtAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 1 Packet Page 214 of 463 §1. ItOAKLA��D - COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION SECTION 2. CONTRACT EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERMINATION SECTION 3. SCOPE OF CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES SECTION 4. COUNTY PAYMENT OBLIGATION FOR CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES SECTION 5. CONTRACTOR ASSURANCES AND WARRANTIES SECTION 6. CONTRACTOR PROVIDED INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION SECTION 7. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS In consideration of the mutual promises, obligations, representations, and assurances in this Contract, the Parties agree to the following: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND DEFINITIONS The following words and expressions when printed with the first letter capitalized as shown herein, whether used in the singular or plural, possessive or non -possessive, and/or either within or without quotation marks, shall be defined and interpreted as follows: 1.1. "Contractor Employee" means without limitation, any employees, officers, directors, members, managers, trustees, volunteers, attorneys, and representatives of Contractor, and also includes any Contractor licensees, concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, independent contractors, subsidiaries, joint ventures or partners, and/or any such persons, successors or predecessors, employees, and/or any and all persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with any of the above. "Contractor Employee" shall also include any person who was a Contractor Employee at anytime during the term of this Contract but, for any reason, is no longer employed, appointed, or elected in that capacity. 1.2. "Claims" means any alleged losses, claims, complaints, demands for relief or damages, suits, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, deficiencies, liability, penalties, litigation, costs, and expenses, including, but not limited to, reimbursement for reasonable attorney fees, witness fees, court costs, investigation expenses, litigation expenses, amounts paid in settlement, and/or other amounts or liabilities of any kind which are imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against the County, or for which the County may become legally and/or contractually obligated to pay or defend against, whether direct, whether based upon any alleged violation of the federal or the state constitution, any federal or state statute, rule, regulation, or any alleged violation of federal or state common law, whether any such claims are brought in law or equity, tort, contract, or otherwise, and/or whether commenced or threatened. 1.3. "County" means the County of Oakland, a Municipal and Constitutional Corporation, its departments, divisions, authorities, boards, committees, and "County Agent" as defined below. AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 215 of 463 Page 2 §2. fOAKLgND= COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 1.4. "County Agent" means all elected and appointed officials, directors, board members, council members, commissioners, employees, volunteers, representatives, and/or any such persons' successors (whether such person act or acted in their personal representative or official capacities), and/or any persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with any of them. "County Agent" shall also include any person who was a "County Agent" anytime during the term of this Contract but, for any reason, is no longer employed, appointed, or elected and serving as an Agent. 1.5. "Day" means any calendar day, which shall begin at 12:00:01 a.m. and end at 11:59:59 p.m. 1.6. "Contract Documents" This Contract includes and fully incorporates herein all of the following documents: 1.6.1. Exhibit I: Standardized List of Contract Items 1.6.2. Exhibit II: County Locations CONTRACT EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERMINATION 2.1. This Contract shall be effective when signed by an authorized individual representing each Party, and unless otherwise terminated or canceled as provided below, it shall end at 11:59:59 p.m. on the "Contract Expiration Date" shown on the first page of this Contract, at which time this Contract expires without any further act or notice of either Party being required. The Parties are under no obligation to renew or extend this Contract after Contract Expiration Date. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances shall this Contract be effective and binding and no payments to the Contractor shall be due or owing for any Contractor services until and unless: 2.1.1. This Contract is signed by a Contractor Employee, legally authorized to bind the Contractor. 2.1.2. Any and all Contractor Certificates of Insurance, and any other conditions precedent to the Contract have been submitted and accepted by the County. 2.1.3. This Contract is signed by an authorized agent of the Oakland County Purchasing Division, as provided for on the signature page of this Contract, who shall be the final signatory to this Contract. 2.2. The County may terminate and/or cancel this Contract (or any part thereof) at any time during the term, any renewal, or any extension of this Contract, upon ninety (90) days written notice to the Contractor, for any reason, including convenience without incurring obligation or penalty of any kind. Notwithstanding the above, if the County is being reimbursed for any cost or expenses incurred under this Contract by any third party, including any Federal, State or local governmental agency, and any such third party funding is terminated, the County may terminate, end or cancel this Contract immediately ttAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 216 of 463 Page 3 0 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION upon written notice to the Contractor. The effective date for termination or cancellation shall be clearly stated in the written notice. 2.3. The County's sole obligation in the event of termination is for payment for actual services rendered by the Contractor before the effective date of termination. Under no circumstances shall the County be liable for any future loss of income, profits, any consequential damages or any loss of business opportunities, revenues, or any other economic benefit Contractor may have realized but for the termination and/or cancellation of this Contract. The County shall not be obligated to pay Contractor any cancellation or termination fee if this Contract is cancelled or terminated as provided herein. 2.4. Contractor may terminate and/or cancel this Contract (or any part thereof) at any time for convenience upon ninety (90) days written notice to the County, and within thirty days (30) notice to the County if the County has failed or has not attempted to cure a breach under this Agreement. The effective date of termination and/or cancellation and the specific alleged default shall be clearly stated in the written notice. Notwithstanding Contractor's right to terminate under this section, in the event of termination, Contractor shall provide its best efforts and cooperation to ensure an orderly and efficient transition of the Services to another supplier. 2.5. The County may extend the term of this Agreement for up to an additional twelve month period only by written amendment. The County shall notify Contractor of any determination to extend this Agreement at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of this relevant option year. SCOPE OF CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES 3.1. The Contractor shall supply and deliver specified office supplies, stationary and other items selected from the list in Exhibit I (incorporated and made a part of this Agreement by reference) ("Products" and "Services") and/or a OfficeMax Contract Inc. Products Supply Catalogue, to designated Oakland County Facilities, for the prices set forth therein. Other catalogues may be offered during the term of the Contract at separately negotiated pricing between the Parties, including, but not limited to, the "S.O.S." catalogue. The OfficeMax Contract Inc. Products Supply Catalogue shall have a complete description of each item. 3.2. Contractor will be solely responsible for maintenance of the catalogs and will document all additions, deletion, manufacturers' discontinuance of products/equipment, and all associated variables including pricing revisions. Any changes, substitutions, additions, deletions and/or pricing revisions must be reviewed and approved by the COUNTY and Contractor in writing prior to any inclusion to the Oakland County Office Supply Catalogue list. 3.3. Periodically, at least annually, Contractor will prepare and distribute an Oakland County tOffice Supply Catalogue. This list will be revised semi-annually. The product catalogue AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT DGUDGET-PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 217 of 463 Page 4 COUNTY MICHIGAN I . BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION shall have a complete description of each item. Core item products and pricing will be reviewed and changed quarterly based on product cost changes and market conditions. 3.4. The following prices, payment terms, and incentives shall apply to this Contract. 3.4.1. "Net Purchases" for purposes of this Section shall mean the aggregate purchase from Contractor of Products under this Contract, net of (i) returns/cancelled orders, (ii) applicable taxes, (iii) credits, and (iv) shipping/handling fees separately billed. 3.4.2. "Non -Contract" Product prices shall be at a discounts up to 85%. 3.4.3. Payment Terms shall be: 2%/10 net 20 for daily invoicing. Payment must be made via EFT to receive the incentive or discount 3.4.4. If Oakland County spends less than $50,000 per year Contractor will add a 5% markup over the "core item" pricing applied. 3.4.5 Volume Incentives shall be provided, based upon total annual Net Purchases as follows: Annual Net Purchases Incentive $0 to $500,000 .5% $500,001 to $999,000 1% $1,000,000 + 2% 3.4.5. Electronic Commerce Incentive of 1 % of total Net Purchase volume shall be provided if greater than 75% of Net Purchases are placed electronically. Payment of any applicable incentives due pursuant to this Section 3.4 is contingent upon 90% of invoices being paid on time and within payment terms. 3.4.6. In consideration of the length of this contract and the benefits that OfficeMax will derive as a result, OfficeMax will pay the County a long term contract incentive. Within 30 days of contract signing, OfficeMax will pay $83,334 to Oakland County. OfficeMax will pay the County $83,334 by June 30, 2007. OfficeMax will pay the County $83,334 by June 30, 2008. This provision is applicable only to Oakland County. 3.4.7. If Oakland County terminates this Agreement prior to the expiration date identified on the first page of this Agreement (Term) for any reason other than a material breach by OfficeMax, or OfficeMax terminates this Agreement due to a material breach by Customer, OfficeMax will have no obligation to pay any long term contract incentive that might otherwise become due pursuant to section 3.4.6. AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT Aft BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 5 Packet Page 218 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROODS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 3.4.8. Incentives described in this Section 3: (i) are based on Oakland County executing this Agreement; (ii) are conditional on Oakland County paying all invoices according to the agreed upon terms; and (iii) will be calculated against total paid invoices, only on Net Sales, and only on Net Sales occurring while this Agreement is in full force and effect. Oakland County will be eligible for such incentives provided that Oakland County continuously maintains a current and in good standing account. All incentives are subject to and require that ninety percent (90%) of invoices are paid according to the terms of this Agreement. If ninety percent (90%) of invoices are not paid according to the terms and conditions outlined in this Agreement, no incentive shall be paid for the applicable measurement period and will not be paid retroactively. Should outstanding invoices exist, OfficeMax reserves the right to issue payment for incentives against outstanding invoices in lieu of paying the incentive directly to Oakland County. 3.5. Contractor shall highlight Contract Items on the Internet item list. 3.6. Contractor shall coordinate with County regarding internet order procedures and training. 3.7. Contractor shall accept and process Internet and authorized, approved fax orders from County locations as identified in Exhibit III. Purchases may also be made through issuance of a purchase order. 3.8. Contractor shall provide next -day order delivery to ordering locations identified in Exhibit III 3.9. Deliveries shall be made to each ordering location with a signature obtained on the manifest. Packlist shall be with merchandise. Contractor will retain manifest for support of the invoice inquiries 3.10. Contractor shall apply the appropriate, agreed -upon discount to purchases made under this Contract. 3.11. Contractor shall maintain inventory levels of items shown in Oakland County Office Supply and OfficeMax Contract Inc. Products Catalogues which will insure a 98.5% fill rate. 3.12. Contractor shall provide the following usage reports: a) Month and year-to-date sales for each authorized cost center; b) Monthly and year-to-date usage reports ranked in descending order for units and dollars for Contract Items and all items; c) Accounts payable with twice monthly summary invoice supported with listed invoices, in agreed -upon format, and credit memos; d) Accounts payable with twice monthly statement; e) Month and year-to-date items ordered by department code. AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 6 Packet Page 219 of 463 am COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 3.13. Contractor shall handle order adjustments (returns, misfills, shortages, overages, etc.). The County will call OfficeMax Contract Inc. Products' Customer Service, and Customer Service will issue a return/credit authorization number ("ATR") to County. Any items returned pursuant to this section will be picked up on the next day's delivery. Contractor shall issue a credit memo with invoice by Ordering Division, purchase order number, and ATR number. COUNTY PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS FOR CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES 4.1. Except as otherwise expressly provided for in this Contract, the County's sole financial obligation to the Contractor under this Contract shall be: 4.1.1. Payment for the items ordered from Exhibit I and/or a OfficeMax Contract Inc. Products Supply Catalogue. In no event, shall the County's amount due and owing the Contractor for any and all goods and/or services rendered exceed the amount identified as the "NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT" on the first page of this Contract. In the event the Contractor can reasonably foresee the total billings for its goods and/or services will exceed this "NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT, "the Contractor shall provide the County with notice of this contingency at least 15 Days before this event. 4.1.2. Every two weeks (twice per month), the Contractor shall submit an invoice to the County which shall itemize all amounts due and/or owing by the County under this Contract, as of the date of the invoice. The invoices shall be submitted in the form requested by the County. The County shall have no obligation to make payment until a proper invoice of service is submitted. 4.1.3. Price changes will be considered only on a calendar quarter basis during the contracting year. Discounts for electronic ordering, volume sales and electronic fund transfers are as set forth in Section 3.4. 4.1.4. Contractor shall advise the County in writing of any proposed price increases or manufacturer's discount structure changes, providing a copy of the proposed price list and/or acceptable evidence of change in manufacturers discount structure. Contractor will be responsible for furnishing and delivering approved price lists to all County departments and other Participating Agencies. It also shall be Contractor's responsibility to keep COUNTY and Participating Agencies informed of any other changes. Unless otherwise qualified, revisions shall be effective on the first business day of the next calendar quarter following such notification of price change. Upward revisions shall be subject to acceptance by COUNTY. 4.2. The County and Contractor have the right to offset any amounts due and owing to the other should that Parry incur any costs associated with this Contract that are the obligations of the other Party under this Contract. AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AID BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 220 of 463 Page 7 §5. IfOAKLAI'�ID COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 4.3. This Contract does not authorize any in -kind services by either Party, unless expressly provided herein. CONTRACTOR'S ASSURANCES AND WARRANTIES 5.1. Service Warranty. Contractor warrants that all services performed hereunder.will be performed in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations, ordinances, and professional standards. 5.2. Business and Professional Licenses. The Contractor will obtain and maintain at all times during the term of this Contract all applicable business and professional licenses necessary to provide the contracted services. 5.3. Equipment and Supplies. The Contractor is responsible for providing equipment and supplies not expressly required to be provided by the County herein. 5.4. Taxes. The Contractor shall pay its own local, state and federal taxes, including without limitation, social security taxes, and unemployment compensation taxes. The County shall not be liable to or required to reimburse the Contractor for any federal, state and local taxes or fees of any kind, provided an appropriate tax exemption certificate is furnished to Contractor. 5.5. Contractor's Incidental Ex enses. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Contract, the Contractor shall be solely responsible and liable for all costs and expenses incident to the performance of all services for the County including, but not limited to, any professional dues, association fees, license fees, fines, taxes, and penalties. 5.6. Contractor Employees. 5.6.1. Contractor shall employ and assign qualified Contractor Employees as necessary and appropriate to provide the services under this Contract. Contractor shall ensure all Contractor Employees have all the necessary knowledge, skill, and qualifications necessary to perform the required services and possess any necessary licenses, permits, certificates, and governmental authorizations as may required by law. 5.6.2. Contractor shall solely control, direct, and supervise all Contractor Employees with respect to all Contractor obligations under this Contract. Contractor will be solely responsible for and fully liable for the conduct and supervision of any Contractor Employee 5.6.3. All Contractor Employees shall wear and display appropriate County -provided identification at all times while working on County premises. 5.6.4. All Contractor Employees assigned to work under this Contract may, at the County's discretion, be subject to a security check and clearance by the County. AA DBUDGET-PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES KLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMEV CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 221 of 463 Page 8 §6. COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 5.6.5. The employees and agents of each Party, shall while on the premises of the other Party, comply with all rules and regulations of the premises, including, but not limited to, security requirements. 5.7. Contractor Employee -Related Expenses. All Contractor Employees shall be employed at the Contractor's sole expense (including employment -related taxes and insurance) and the Contractor warrants that all Contractor Employees shall fully comply with and adheres to all of the terms of this Contract. Contractor shall be solely and completely liable for any and all applicable Contractor Employee's federal, state, or local payment withholdings or contributions and/or any and all Contractor Employee related pension or welfare benefits plan contribution under federal or state law. Contractor shall indemnify and hold the County harmless for all Claims against the County by any Contractor Employee, arising out of any contract for hire or employer -employee relationship between the Contractor and any Contractor Employee, including, but not limited to, Worker's Compensation, disability pay or other insurance of any kind. 5.8. Full Knowledge of Service Expectations and Attendant Circumstances. Contractor warrants that before submitting its Proposal and/or entering into this Contract, it had a full opportunity to review the proposed services, and review all County requirements and/or expectations under this Contract. The Contractor is responsible for being adequately and properly prepared to execute this Contract. Contractor has satisfied itself in all material respects that it will be able to perform all obligations under the Contract as specified herein. 5.9. The Contractor's Relationship To The County Is That Of An Independent Contractor. Nothing in this Contract is intended to establish an employer -employee relationship between the County and either the Contractor or any Contractor Employee. All Contractor Employees assigned to provide services under this Contract by the Contractor shall, in all cases, be deemed employees of the Contractor and not employees, agents or sub -contractors of the County. CONTRACTOR PROVIDED INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION Failure on the part of Contractor to obtain and maintain all required insurance coverage is a material breach upon which COUNTY may, in its sole discretion, suspend Contractor's performance or terminate this Agreement pursuant to applicable notice and cure provisions contained in this Contract. 6.1. Indemnification. 6.1.1. Contractor shall, to the extent of Contractor's negligence, indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from any and all Claims which are incurred by or asserted against the County by any person or entity, alleged to have been caused or found to arise, from the negligent acts, performances, errors, or omissions of Contractor or Contractor's Employees, including, without limitation, all Claims f „T AT f�T smoo, n A TA . i to ,j „g&,t ,9�any person or damage to any property. AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 222 of 463 Page 9 frOAKL�. COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 6.1.2. The indemnification rights contained in this Contract are in excess and over and above any valid and collectible insurance rights/policies. During the term of this .Contract, if the validity or collectability of the Contractor's insurance is disputed by the insurance company, the Contractor shall indemnify the County for all claims asserted against the County and if the insurance company prevails, the Contractor shall indemnify the County for uncollectible accounts. 6.1.3. Contractor shall have no rights against the County for any indemnification (e.g., contractual, equitable, or by implication), contribution, subrogation, and/or any other right to be reimbursed by the County except as expressly provided by law. 6.2. Contractor waives and releases all actions, liabilities, loss and damage including any subrogated rights it may have against the County based upon any Claim brought against the County suffered by a Contractor Employee. 6.3. Under no circumstances shall either Party be responsible to the other Party for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages incurred or suffered in connection with Products and/or Services provided under this Contract. 6.4. Contractor Provided Insurance. At all times during this Contract, Contractor shall obtain and maintain insurance according to the specifications indicated. 1. Contractor agrees to procure and maintain insurance coverage at its own expense during the term of this contract according to the following minimum specifications: a. Commercial General Liability with the following as minimum requirements: $3,000,000 — General Aggregate Limit other than Products/Completed Operations $3,000,000 — Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $3,000,000 — Personal & Advertising Injury Limit $3,000,000 — Each Occurrence Limit $ 500,000 — Fire Damage Limit (Any One Fire) $ 10,000 —Medical Payments —Any One Person Insurance policy shall contain the following coverage(s): a Occurrence Form Broad Form Property Damage * Premises/Operations • Libel and Slander AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A DBUDGET-PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 10 Packet Page 223 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 0 Independent Contractors ® (Blanket) Broad Form contractual • Personal Injury — Delete Contractual Exclusion "A" • Per Location General Aggregate The total limits of general liability coverage required herein maybe satisfied with a combination of a Primary General Liability (and) Umbrella/Excess policy having not less than $3,000,000 in limits, specifically listing the Primary General Liability policy as underlying insurance. b. Workers' Compensation: Coverage A, with limits statutorily required by any applicable Federal or State law (and) Employers Liability Insurance, Coverage B with minimum limits of $500,000 each accident, $500,000 disease each employee, and $500,000 disease policy limit. C. Automobile Liability: with minimum limit of $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per occurrence (including No -Fault as required by law) for all hired, leased, owned and non -owned vehicles. d. Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 per aggregate. e. Crime/Surety Coverage: Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 covering against loss of money, securities, or other property referred to hereunder which may result from employee dishonest, forgery or alteration, theft, disappearance and destruction, computer fraud, burglary and robbery and made payable to the County of Oakland. f. Additional Insured: All policies of insurance, with the exception of Workers' Compensation, shall name the County of Oakland (as defined in this Contract) and County Agent (as defined in this Contract) as Additional Insured. 2. General Provisions: a. All Certificates of Insurance and policies of the contractor, any outside vendor or sub -contractor must maintain limits and coverages required by the Contractor and must meet and/or contain the following clauses and endorsements: AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 11 Packet Page 224 of 463 §7. COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION The insurance company(s) issuing the policy or policies shall have no recourse against the County of Oakland for payment of any premiums or for assessments under any form of policy. 2. Any and all deductibles or self -insured retentions in the above described insurance policies shall be assumed by and be for the account of, and at sole risk of, the contractor. All Certificates are to provide ninety (90) day written notice of material change, cancellation, or non -renewal. All Certificates of Insurance and Insurance Binders must be provided no less than ten (10) working days before commencement of work to the Oakland County Purchasing Division. 4. All Insurance carriers are subject to the approval of Oakland County and shall be licensed and approved to do business with the State of Michigan. 5. All policies shall be on a primary, non-contributory basis with any other insurance and/or self-insurance carried by the County. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 7.1. Access To County Facilities. While the Contractor retains the right to perform services at any time, the Contractor must obtain prior permission by the County for access to County facilities after the County's regular business hours. 7.2. Cumulative Remedies. A Party's exercise of any remedy shall not preclude the exercise of any other remedies, all of which shall be cumulative. A Party shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to determine which remedies are to be exercised and in which order. 7.3. Survival of Terms and Conditions. The following terms and conditions shall survive and continue in full force beyond the termination and/or cancellation of this Contract (or any part thereof) until the terms and conditions are fully satisfied or expire by their very nature: "CONTRACTOR'S ASSURANCES AND WARRANTIES"; "CONTRACTOR PROVIDED INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION"; "Damage Clean Up To County Property and/or Premises "Audit"; "Severability"; "Governing Law/Consent To Jurisdiction And Venue"; and "Survival of Terms And Conditions". AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Packet Page 225 of 463 Page 12 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 7.4. County Right to Suspend Services. Upon written notice, the County may suspend performance of this Contract if Contractor has failed to comply with Federal, State, or Local laws, or any requirements contained in this Contract. The right to suspend services is in addition to the County's right to terminate and/or cancel this Contract. The County shall incur no penalty, expense, or liability to Contractor if the County suspends services under this Section. 7.5. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except as provided for the benefit of the Parties, this Contract does not and is not intended to create any obligation, duty, promise, contractual right or benefit, right to be indemnified, right to be subrogated to the Parties' rights in this Contract, and/or any other right, in favor of any other person or entity. 7.6. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations, insurance policy requirements, and requirements applicable to its activities under this Contract. 7.7. Permits and Licenses. Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining throughout the term of this Contract all licenses, permits, certificates, and governmental authorizations necessary to perform all of its obligations under this Contract and to conduct business under this Contract. Upon request by the County, Contractor shall furnish copies of any permit, license, certificate or governmental authorizations necessary to provide services under this Contract. 7.8. Discrimination. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or handicap in violation of State and Federal law. 7.9. Reservation of Rights. This Contract does not, and is not intended to impair, divest, delegate, or contravene any constitutional, statutory, and/or other legal right, privilege, power, obligation, duty, or immunity of the County. 7.10. Force Majeure. Notwithstanding any other term or provision of this Contract, neither Party shall be liable to the other for any failure of performance hereunder if such failure is due to any cause beyond the reasonable control of that Party and that Party cannot reasonably accommodate or mitigate the effects of any such cause. Such cause shall include, without limitation, acts of God, fire, explosion, vandalism, any law, order, regulation, direction, action, or request of the United States government or of any other government, national emergencies, insurrections, riots, wars, strikes, lockouts, work stoppages, or other labor difficulties. Reasonable notice shall be given to the affected Party of any such event. The Contractor is expected, through insurance or alternative temporary or emergency service arrangements, to continue its obligations under this contract in the event of a reasonably anticipated, insurable business risk such as business interruption and/or any insurable casualty or loss. 7.11. Conflict of Interest. Pursuant to Public Act 317 and 318 of 1968, as amended (MCL 15.321, et seq.), no contracts shall be entered into between the County, including all AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT tD BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 13 Packet Page 226 of 463 itOAKL�� COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION agencies and departments thereof, and any County Agent. To avoid any real or perceived conflict of interest, Contractor shall identify any Contractor Employee or relative of Contractor's Employees who are presently employed by the County. Contractor shall give the County notice if there are any County Agents or relatives of County Agents who are presently employed by Contractor. 7.12. Damage Clean up to County Property and/or Premises. Contractor shall be responsible for any unexpected and/or unnecessary damage to any County property, its premises, or a County Agent that is caused by Contractor or Contractor's Employees. If damage occurs, Contractor shall make necessary repairs and/or replacements to the damaged property to the satisfaction of the County. If the damage cannot be repaired to the County's satisfaction, Contractor shall reimburse the County the actual reasonable cost for repairing or replacing the damaged property. The Contractor shall be responsible for assuring that all County and municipal sites are restored to their original condition. 7.13. Use of Confidential Information. Neither Party shall reproduce, provide, disclose, or give access to Confidential Information to any third party, or to any Party employee not having a legitimate need to know any such information and data, and shall not use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than performing its services under this Contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either Party may disclose the Confidential Information if required by law, statute or other legal process; provided that the disclosing party agrees to (i) give the other Party prompt written notice of an impending disclosure, (ii) provide reasonable assistance to the other Party in opposing or limiting the disclosure, and (iii) make only such disclosure as is compelled or required. In the event of a Freedom of Information Act request, a reasonable effort shall be made to provide notification of such required disclosure of confidential information to the other Party, prior to disclosure. 7.13.1. This Contract imposes no obligation upon Contractor with respect to any Confidential Information which Contractor can establish by legally sufficient evidence: (i) was in the possession of, or was known by Contractor, prior to its receipt from the County, without an obligation to maintain its confidentiality; or (ii) is obtained by Contractor from a third party having the right to disclose it, without an obligation to keep such information confidential. 7.13.2. As used in this Contract, Confidential Information means all information that the County is required or permitted by law to keep confidential, and marked/identified by a legend indicating such information is "Confidential." 7.14. Contractor Use of County Licensed Software. In order for the Contractor to perform under this Contract, the County may permit Contractor or Contractor Employees to access certain copyrighted Software licensed to the County. Contractor or Contractor Employees shall not: transfer, remove, use, copy, or otherwise provide or make available any such copyrighted Software or Documentation to any other person or entity, for any AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 14 Packet Page 227 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION purpose, without the prior written consent of the County and/or the licensor. Furthermore, neither the Contractor nor Contractor Employee shall produce a source listing, decompile, disassemble, or otherwise reverse engineer any copyrighted Software. Neither the Contractor nor Contractor Employee shall use any copyrighted software contrary to the provisions of any applicable Software license agreement or state or federal law. 7.15. Grant Compliance. If any part of this Contract is supported or paid for with any state or federal funds granted to the County, the Contractor shall comply with all applicable grant requirements. 7.16. Dispute Resolution. All disputes arising under or relating to the execution, interpretation, performance, or nonperformance of this Contract involving or affecting the Parties may first be submitted to the respective Contract Administrators for possible resolution. The Contract Administrators may promptly meet and confer in an effort to resolve such dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved in five (5) business days, the dispute may be submitted to the signatories of this Contract or their successors in office. The signatories of this Contract may meet promptly and confer in an effort to resolve such dispute. 7.17. Access and Records. Contractor will maintain accurate books and records in connection with the services provided under this Contract for 36 months after termination of this Contract, and provide the County with reasonable access to such book and records. 7.18. Audit. Contractor shall allow the County's Auditing Division, or an independent auditor hired by the County, to perform finance compliance audits with the authority to access all pertinent records and interview any Contractor Employee as customary, and upon reasonable advance notice to Contractor throughout the term of this Contract, and for a period of three years following the date of any final payment for Products and Services under the Contract. The cost of any audit shall be borne by the County. County shall make reasonable efforts to minimize business disruption to Contractor in performing any audit under this Contract. 7.18.1. Contractor shall explain any audit finding, questionable costs, or other Contract compliance deficiencies to the County within forty-five (45) days of receiving the final audit report. Contractor's response shall include all necessary documents and information that refute the final audit report. Failure by Contractor to respond in writing within 45 days shall be deemed acceptance of the final audit report. 7.19. Delegation /Subcontract/Assi ent. Contractor shall not delegate, assign, or subcontract any obligations or rights under this Contract without the prior written consent of the County. 7.19.1. The rights and obligations under this Contract shall not be diminished in any manner by assignment, delegation or subcontract. , AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 15 Packet Page 228 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 7.19.2. Any assignment, delegation, or subcontract by Contractor and approved by the County, must include a requirement that the assignee, delegate, or subcontractor will comply with the rights and obligations contained in this Contract. 7.19.3. The Contractor shall remain primarily liable for all work performed by any subcontractors. Contractor shall remain liable to the County for any obligations under the Contract not completely performed by any Contractor delegate or subcontractor. 7.19.4. Should a Subcontractor fail to provide the established level of service and response, the Contractor shall contract with another agency for these services in a timely manner. Any additional costs associated with securing a competent subcontractor shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor. 7.19.5. This Contract cannot be sold. 7.19.6. In the event that a Petition in Bankruptcy is filed and there is an assignment of this Contract by a Court, the County may declare this Contract null and void. 7.19.7. If any assumption, takeover, or unauthorized performance of Contractor's duties occurs without the County's prior written approval, this Agreement will become void for failure of its essential purpose. Such an act is a material breach of this Agreement, upon which the County may pursue any lawful remedy. 7.20. Non Exclusive Contract. No provision in this Contract limits, or is intended to limit, in any way the Contractor's right to offer and provide its services to the general public, other business entities, municipalities, or governmental agencies during or after the term of this Contract. Similarly, this Contract is a non-exclusive agreement and the County may freely engage other persons to perform the same work that the Contractor performs. Except as provided in this Contract, this Contract shall not be construed to guarantee the Contractor or any Contractor Employee any number of fixed or certain number or quantity of hours or services to be rendered to or goods to be purchased by the County. 7.21. No Implied Waiver. Absent a written waiver, no act, failure, or delay by a Party to pursue or enforce any right or remedy under this Contract shall constitute a waiver of those rights with regard to any existing or subsequent breach of this Contract. No waiver of any term, condition, or provision of this Contract, whether by conduct or otherwise, in one or more instances, shall be deemed or construed as a continuing waiver of any term, condition, or provision of this Contract. No waiver by either Party shall subsequently affect its right to require strict performance of this Contract. 7.22. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds a term, condition, or provision of this Contract to be illegal or invalid, then the term, condition, or provision shall be deemed severed from this Contract. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of this Contract shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the above, if Contractor's promise to indemnify or hold the County harmless is found illegal or invalid, Contractor shall contribute the maximum it is permitted to pay by law toward the payment and satisfaction of any Claims against the County. 1\17TeT (=r ePPt �rIeTAkAXTTlllf'Q\:....�....\77 C 117•!1!1 .!1!1l1Z MF./1.71 AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 16 Packet Page 229 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 7.23. Captions. The section and subsection numbers, captions, and any index to such sections and subsections contained in this Contract are intended for the convenience of the reader and are not intended to have any substantive meaning and shall not be interpreted to limit or modify any substantive provisions of this contract. Any use of the singular or plural number, any reference to the male, female, or neuter genders, and any possessive or nonpossessive use in this contract shall be deemed the appropriate plurality, gender or possession as the context requires. 7.24. Notices. Except for quarterly notices of price adjustments or catalogue changes, notices given under this Contract shall be in writing and shall either be personally delivered, sent by express delivery service, certified mail, or first class U.S. mail postage prepaid, and addressed to the person listed below. Notice will be deemed given when one of the following occur: (1) the date of actual receipt; (2) the next business day when notice is sent express delivery service or personal delivery; or (3) three days after mailing first class or certified U.S. mail. 7.24.1. If notice is sent to the Contractor, it shall be addressed to: OfficeMax Contract Inc. ATTN: Christopher Zott Manager, Business Relations 13301 Stephens Road Warren, Michigan 48089 Phone: 800/542-8787 ext. 7087 With a copy to: OfficeMax Inc. ATTN: General Counsel 150 E. Pierce Rd. Itafca, IL 60143 7.24.2. If notice is sent to the County, it shall be addressed to: Mr. Joseph Hylla, Manager Oakland County Purchasing Division 1200 N. Telegraph Road Pontiac, MI 48341 7.24.3. Either Party may change the address or individual to which notice is sent by notifying the other party in writing of the change. 7.25. Contract Modifications or Amendments. Any modifications, amendments, recessions, waivers, or releases to this Contract must be in writing and agreed to by both Parties. Unless otherwise agreed, the modification, amendment, recession, waiver, or release shall be signed by an expressly authorized Contractor Employee and by the same person who AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 17 Packet Page 230 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION signed the Contract for the County or other County Agent as authorized by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners. 7.26. Precedence of Documents. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions in any of the documents comprising this Contract, the conflict shall be resolved as follows: 7.26.1. If any conflicting terms or conditions are set forth in any Exhibits, purchase orders, invoices, or other documents, the terms and conditions contained in this main Contract document shall prevail and take precedence. 7.27. Governing Laws/Consent to Jurisdiction and Venue. This Contract shall be governed, interpreted, and enforced by the laws of the State of Michigan. Except as otherwise required by law or court rule, any action brought to enforce, interpret, or decide any Claim arising under or related to this Contract shall be brought in the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Michigan, the 50th District Court of the State of Michigan, or the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, as dictated by the applicable jurisdiction of the court. Except as otherwise required by law or court rule, venue is proper in the courts set forth above. The choice of forum set forth above shall not be deemed to preclude the enforcement of any judgment obtained in such forum or taking action under this Contract to enforce such judgment in any appropriate jurisdiction. 7.28. Publicity. Contractor shall not disclose any details in connection with this Agreement to any person or entity except as may be otherwise provided herein or required by law. However, in recognizing Contractor's need to identify its services and related clients Contractor may publicize its role under this Agreement, provided: A. Contractor shall develop all publicity material in a professional manner. B. During the term of this Contract, Contractor shall neither authorize another to, nor publish or disseminate any commercial advertisements, press release, feature articles, or other materials using the name of COUNTY without the prior written consent of County, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. C. Contractor may, without the prior written consent of COUNTY, indicate in its proposals and sales materials that it has been awarded this Agreement by Oakland County, provided that the requirements of this Paragraph 7.29 shall apply. 7.29. Employment Eligibility Verification. Contractor warrants that it fully complies with all Federal statutes and regulations regarding the employment of aliens and others and that all its employees performing work under this Master Agreement meet the citizenship or alien status requirements set forth in Federal statutes and regulations. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless COUNTY, its officers, participating government agencies and employees from and against any sanctions and any other liability which may be assessed against Contractor or COUNTY in connection with any alleged violation of any Federal statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of any persons performing work hereunder. M1r AT r.T nnDl�Tln'T'n��xmnrc�a„....�[}.�}g.��7.nn'T7•nnnznnhn.71 OAKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 18 Packet Page 231 of 463 L, I COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION 7.30. "America Saves" Program. The County has determined to permit Contractor use of the terms and conditions of this Contract to sell Products to other governmental entities (a "Participating Agency"). The terms of such arrangement between County and Contractor are set forth in a separate agreement. In no event shall County be considered a dealer, remarketer, agent or other representative of Contractor. 7.31. Entire Contract. This Contract represents the entire Contract and understanding between the Parties. This Contract supercedes all other prior oral or written understandings, communications, agreements or Contracts between the Parties, and specifically, shall supersede and replace the Oakland County Purchasing Contract identified as contract 001260, dated June 01, 2006 between the Parties. The language of this Contract shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and not construed strictly for or against any Party. \ A I'llQ I'll1 AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 19 Packet Page 232 of 463 COUNTY MICHIGAN L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION The undersigned executes this Contract on behalf of Contractor and the County, and by doing so legally obligates and binds Contractor and the County to the terms and conditions of this Contract. FOR THE CONTRACTOR: BY: m DATE:' appeared in person before me this day and executed this Contract on behalf of Contractor and acknowledged to me under oath that has taken all actions and secured any and all necessary approvals and authorizations and has the requisite authority from Contractor to fully and completely obligate and bind Contractor to the terms and conditions of this Contract and any and all other documents incorporated by reference and also acknowledged to me under oath having been provided with copies and having read and reviewed all Contract documents including all documents incorporated by reference. Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of Notary Public My Commission Expires: FOR THE COUNTY: 2006. County, Michigan BY: ;' DATE: ()`— �._ Joseph Hylla, Manager, Oakland County Purchasin epartment AKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT A D BUDGET -PURCHASING DIVISION -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT NUMBER 001260 Page 20 Packet Page 233 of 463 COUNTY L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION AGREEMENT GRANTING OFFICEMAX CONTRACT, INC. PERMISSION TO USE OAKLAND COUNTY'S MASTER PURCHASING AGREEMENT IN ITS "AMERICA SAVES" PROGRAM PURPOSE: 1. After a competitive bidding and selection process by Oakland County, OfficeMax Contract, Inc. ("Contractor") and the County (County) entered into a Master Purchasing Agreement, Contract Number 001260 (Master Agreement) which provides for the purchase of various office supplies and equipment (the "Products") from Contractor; 2. Contractor desires to extend the same terms, covenants and conditions available to County under the Master Agreement to other government agencies ("Participating Agency") which, in their discretion, desire to make purchases under the Master Agreement according to the terms and conditions stated therein; 3. Contractor desires to use the County as a reference and to identify it as a Party to the Master Agreement when Contractor extends the terms, covenants and conditions of the Master Agreement to Participating Agencies; 4. The County, recognizing the benefits and savings that extended purchasing programs can offer to Participating Agencies, and through them, to the taxpayer, desires to make the Master Agreement available to Participating Agencies to enable Participating Agencies to purchase Products on the same terms, covenants, conditions, and pricing as County, subject to any applicable laws, regulations and ordinances of the State of purchase; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The County agrees to be identified and named as a Party to the Master Agreement that will be used in Contractor's extended purchasing program, known as "America Saves." 2. The County's role, duties and participation in "America Saves" shall be only as specifically set forth in this section. Contractor shall strictly limit its portrayal of the role of the County as set forth herein. Any representations by Contractor that the County's role exceeds the role described below shall automatically terminate this Agreement. a) The County agrees to place a copy of its Master Agreement with Contractor on the County website. {\\1TALGLAPPI\DATA\WDOCS\itasca\225112:0077:00033927: } Packet Page 234 of 463 L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE frOAKL OAKLAND COUNTY COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION b) The County agrees to place a copy of this Agreement granting Contractor permission to use the Master Agreement in its "America Saves" Program on the County website. c) The County agrees to place information regarding its competitive bidding procedures on the County website. d) The County agrees to include a statement that any other governmental entity which elects to purchase under the Agreement between the County and Contractor may do so without objection by the County. e) The County agrees to identify a County contact on its website. The identified County contact will respond to inquiries about the Agreement between Contractor and the County. The information will include an email address and telephone number. The identified County contact will be instructed to respond to inquiries within a reasonable time, not to exceed 10 business days. f) The County will provide information in the following categories in response to inquiries from other governmental entities: i. The contract execution and expiration dates. ii. The sums expended by the County under the contract. iii. The County procedure for ordering under the contract. iv. A summary of items purchased under the contract. V. Contractor's procedure for delivering items to the County and County's procedures for accepting items. vi. The County's procedure for returning defective or unsatisfactory items to Contractor. vii. The benefits that will accrue to the County if the inquiring entity purchases under the County's Master Agreement. viii. Citations to relevant Michigan statutes and court rules dealing with intergovernmental agreements, purchasing policies, jurisdiction and conflict of laws. 3. In every instance and circumstance in which the Contractor offers for sale or sells any Products to any Participating Agency by or through "America Saves" according to the tenns and conditions of the Contract between itself and the Oakland County, it shall: a) Sell the various Products to the Participating Agency pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement. b) Comply with the relevant laws, regulations and ordinances and respective procurement practices governing the Participating Agency's operation and purchase. c) Comply with the law and venue of the State in which such purchases are made in resolving any disputes between Participating Agency and Contractor which may arise out of use of the County's Master Agreement. d) Advise the Participating Agency that the Master Agreement is not exclusive and that purchases made under this Agreement are at the sole discretion of the Participating Agency. {\\iTALGLAPPt \DATA\WDOCS\itasca\225112:0077:00033927: } Packet Page 235 of 463 0) L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE COAKL OAKLAND COUNTY COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION e) Advise the Participating Agency that the County's permission allowing Contractor to use its Master Agreement for "America Saves" is not and should not be construed as an endorsement of any particular item or product available under the Master Agreement. f) Advise the Participating Agency that the County's permission allowing Contractor to use its Master Agreement for "America Saves" is not and should not be construed as a warranty that the prices available under the Master Agreement are the lowest prices available. g) Advise the Participating Agency that the County assumes no liability, of any sort whatsoever, for any damage, injury or harm of any kind that may arise from use of any Products that the Contractor offers for sale pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement and the Participating Agency selects for purchase. h) As set forth in the Contract between OfficeMax and the County, OfficeMax will provide the Participating Agency with a Volume Incentives, based upon total net annual Net Purchases by Participating Agency: Annual Net Purchases Incentive $0 to 500,000 .5% $500,001 to $999,999 1% $1,000,000 + 2% i) As defined in the Contract between OfficeMax and the County, "Net Purchase" for purposes of this Section 3 means the aggregate purchases from Contractor of Products under this Agreement, net of (i) returns/cancelled orders, (ii) applicable taxes, (iii) credits, and (iv) shipping/handling fees separately billed. j) As set forth in the Contract between OfficeMax and the County, OfficeMax will provide the Participating Agency with an Electronic Commerce Incentive of 1 % of total Net Purchase volume. To qualify for the Electronic Commerce Incentive, greater than 75% of sales dollars must by processed electronically. k) As set forth in the Contract between OfficeMax and the County, OfficeMax will provide the Participating Agency prompt payment terms of 2% additional discount if payment is made withinl0 days following receipt or net 30 based on daily billing. This must by paid via Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT). If EFT is not used, then the incentive or discount does not apply. 1) In addition to the other terms and conditions related to purchases made pursuant to the Contract, OfficeMax will provide the Participating Agency a new account conversion allowance of 5% of the 1 st 60 day's sales to new entities that join the "America Saves" program via OfficeMax. m) If the Participating Agency spends less than $50,000 per year, a 5% markup over the "core item" pricing will be applied. This additional fee covers incremental start-up, ongoing management, and maintenance costs for accounts with lower volumes. n) Assume all responsibility for notifying potential Participating Agencies that the County's Master Purchase Agreement is available in its "America Saves" program. o) Deal directly with the Participating Agency regarding ordering, issuing purchase orders, {\\ITALGLAPP 1 \DATA\WDOCS\itasca\225112:0077:00033927: ) Packet Page 236 of 463 L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE IrOAKLA1D= OAKLAND COUNTY COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION delivery, invoicing, payment and contractual disputes. p) Agree to the addition of other acceptable terms and conditions, at the request of the Participating Agency, provided the additional terms and conditions do not conflict with the terms and conditions of the Master Agreement. If the Participating Agency and the Contractor are unable to agree to other terms and conditions requested by the Participating Agency, the Contractor is under no obligation to sell any good or service to the Participating Agency. q) Pay the County an administrative fee as described in Section 11 for performing the work involved to make the Master Agreement available and to permit its use by Participating Agencies. 4. All Contractor's printed and electronic promotional materials for "America Saves" shall carry disclaimers regarding 3(d), (e), (f) and (g) (above). 5. The County shall have no liability for any costs or damages if the Contractor and the Participating Agency dispute the terms and conditions of the Master Purchase Agreement and/or any additional terms or conditions between them and/or costs or damages incurred by a Participating Agency. 6. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold County harmless in and from any dispute or claim, of any kind or type, including, by way of example and not limitation, any action contemplated or brought in any court, arising from or related to any solicitation, offer to sell, actual sale or dispute regarding any product, including any warranty disputes, product liability claims and any and all promotional or other activity related to "America Saves." 7. In no. event shall the County be considered a dealer, remarketer, agent or other representative of Contractor. 8. This Agreement is effective on June 01, 2006, and shall expire at midnight, May 31, 2009, (the "Term"). This Agreement may be extended upon mutual agreement of the Parties provided the underlying Master Agreement has not expired by its own term or been terminated for any reason by action of either Party. Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days' prior written notice to the other Party for any reason including convenience. Termination of this Agreement shall not affect the Master Purchase Agreement between the County and Contractor. 9. This Agreement shall not interfere with the County's statutory and legal obligation to engage in a fair and impartial bidding process at regularly prescribed intervals. Nor shall any benefit that may be derived by the County as a result of this Agreement be deemed or considered to be an inducement or to create an incentive to circumvent the County's sealed bid process on behalf of Contractor. Selection of an alternate bidder shall automatically terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, including convenience, any and all provisions regarding the County's right to indemnification, subrogation, and {\\ITALG LAPP I \DATA\WDOCS\itasca\225112:0077:00033927: } Packet Page 237 of 463 0 L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE COAKLOAKLAND COUNTY COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION limitations of liability shall survive such termination and continue in full force and effect. 10. In addition to any other incentives for which the County may be eligible, the County shall be entitled to an Administrative Fee on Quarterly total Net Purchases made by Participating Agency(s) as follows: Quarterly Net Purchases Administrative Fee $0 to $500,000 1.5% $500,001 to $1,000,000 1% $1,000,001 + .5% 11. Payment of the administrative fee shall be made quarterly by Contractor to the County. Payment shall be accompanied by a written report identifying all purchases shipped and billed during the applicable quarter. Contractor shall have no claim or right to all or any portion of the Fee. Failure to submit fees and reports within 30 days of the end of a quarter shall be a material breach of this Agreement. 12. Reports and Fees shall be submitted to the County no later than thirty (30) days after the end of the applicable quarter. The Report shall contain sufficient information to permit the County to compare the administrative fee to the actual expenditures of the Participating Agencies based on actual payments to Contractor by the Participating Agencies. 13. The County will notify Contractor in writing of discrepancies between its sales and the County's administrative fee. Contractor shall have 30 days to correct such discrepancies, including correcting any under payment to the County. In addition to any audit rights set forth in the Master Agreement, the County may perform a financial and compliance audit of Contractor's records regarding sales using the County's Master Agreement in its "America Saves" Program. Any such audit shall be limited in scope to annual net purchases only, and shall not contain confidential information concerning the Participating Agencies. 14. Integration/Modification. This Agreement (including attachments hereto, if any) constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the use of the County's Master Purchase Agreement by Contractor in its sales to any other governmental entities. This Agreement supersedes any and all prior written and oral agreements or understandings concerning the use of the Master Purchase Agreement for sales to other governmental entities. This Agreement may only be modified by written amendment, signed by an authorized representative of each Party. 15. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted according the laws of the State of Michigan, without regard to its choice of law provisions. Any disputes between Participating Agency and Contractor which may arise out of the Agreement shall be resolved in accord with the law and venue of the State in which such purchases are made. {\\ITALGLAPPI \DATA\WDOCS\itasca\225112:0077:00033927:} Packet Page 238 of 463 5 COAKL� COUNTY L. BROOKS PATTERSON-COUNTY EXECUTIVE OAKLAND COUNTY PURCHASING DIVISION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. OfflceMiax'Contract, Ina: ­� COUNTY /—,- w" //V . (\\ITALGLAPP 1 \DATA\W DOCS\itasca\225112:0077:00033927: ) Packet Page 239 of 463 10 AM-1038 Back -Up Server Acquisition Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Dan Clements Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Tnfnrm n+inn Subject Title Back -Up Server Acquisition of $38,000. 2.N. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Recommend appropriating funds for the acquisition of back-up servers used to eliminate single point of failures. Previous Council Action Approved by Finance Committee on June 12. Narrative Since April, IT staff have been tasked with identifying single points of failure within the City's network. In the past year the core financial system has been down for multiple days, the on-line payment system has seen sporadic outages, and the e-mail system has been periodically out. These acquisitions will provide redundant support for these critical applications. The acquisition cost will be split between ending fund balance of the General Fund/Utilities/Treatment Plant on an estimated 60%-35%-5% basis. Fiscal Impact Attachments No files) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 11:28 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 12:16 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:19 PM APRV Form Started By: Dan Started On: 06/13/2007 10:29 Clements AM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 240 of 463 AM-1053 2.0. Surplus Assets Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Kathleen Junglov Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Surplus Assets. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff We recommend the Council authorize the items on the list to be surplused in the manner suggested by Jim Stevens, Facilities Maintenance Manager. Any proceeds received from the sale of these items will be receipted into the General Fund. Previous Council Action Finance Committee June 12, 2007. Narrative Attached is a list of items provided by Jim Stevens, Facilities Maintenance Manager. These items were originally purchased by the City, but have been deemed as unusable or no longer needed for City purposes. The list indicates a description of the asset, its current condition, an estimated fair market value, and a recommended disposition of the item. Staff s time to dispose the item is not considered in the calculation. Also attached is MRSC's response to citizen question regarding public notice requirements. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: List of Assets to be Surplused Link: Research Request Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox 1 Admin Services 2 City Clerk 3 Mayor 4 Final Approval Form Started By: Kathleen Junglov Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Approved By Date Status Dan Clements 06/14/2007 10:07 AM APRV Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 10:32 AM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Started On: 06/14/2007 09:55 AM Packet Page 241 of 463 Packet Page 242 of 463 City of Edmonds Surplus Equipment Facilities Maintenance Department DATE: 4-26-07 Condition - Date Working/Not Est FMV Publicaly Working/ (net Minimum Disp. Date Announced Fund Asset/ Tag Broken parts, disposal price (if Option Approved (If N/A, give Date Buyer / Place Purchase (costs / Located # Property Description Brand Model # Serial # etc. costs) applicable) by Council reason) Disposed Disposed Price revenue) OPW EPD980 Trash compactor Kenmore 1398580 D8295877 front panel dents $25 T OPW Whiteboard Ram Industries 16" X 20" Scarred badly 0 T OPW Wooden desk 7 drawer 60 X 33 x 30" Scarred badly 0 T OPW Laminate covered desk 1 drawer 60 X 30 X 29" O.K. $51 T Traction feed printer table with OPW open metal trays 24 x 24 x 29" O.K. 0 T OPW Typewriter pad 15" x 17" Gray O.K. 0 T OPW Typewriter pad 15" x 17" Beige O.K. 0 T Double -sided carrel top, no OPW legs 42 x 36" Bad 0 T Side table, wood and beige OPW laminate, metal legs Martins 22526 Two holes in top 0 T Office chair, blue, 5 casters, OPW 5312 armless Hon 91987 O.K. $1 T Stacking chair, yellow, fabric OPW upholstery, arms Delwood Furniture Dirty 0 T Stacking chair, brown, fabric OPW upholstery, arms Dirty 0 T File cabinet, steel, 4- Badly scratched & OPW 3077 drawer,vertical, legal sized dented 0 T OPW Clay planter and base 11" die. X 11" h. O.K. 0 T Stacking chairs, blue plastic, OPW 'sled'style, 14 ea. Krueger Matrix O.K. $5 T Very dirty and OPW Office chair, blue fabric, arms Lund's worn 0 T OPW 0123 Steel underdesk cabinet, blue 17 X 33 X 29" Bad condition I 0 I T Office chair with arms, brown OPW upholstered Superior Chaircraft Torn 0 T Folding table, gray laminate Comers broken OPW and particle board Fort Smith 30 X 72" out 0 T *Disposal Options A Auction B Bid (sealed) I Internet online auction N Newspaper advertisement "For Sale" O Other P Private seller (negotiated price) s Scrapped T Trash can/dumpster (only if meets specific guidelines set forth in the policy) L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0034_1053_Surplus Assets FM 6-12-07.xls 6/15/200711:19 AM Packet Page 243 of 463 Condition - Date Working/Not Est FMV Publically Working/ (net Minimum Disp. Date Announced Fund Asset/ Tag Broken parts, disposal price (if Option Approved (If N/A, give Date Buyer / Place Purchase (costs / Located # Property Description Brand Model # Serial # etc. costs) applicable) * by Council reason) Disposed Disposed Price revenue) Desk, beige laminate and OPW 03213 wood, 2 drawer O.K. $5 T OPW 6179 12" miter saw Dewalt 7790 0387 ? $10 T Undercounter refrigerator/ OPW freezer Subzero 249R M379132 ? 0 T Straight chair, steel with brown OPW EPD133 upholstery Shaw Walker Co. (made in 1962) ? 0 T OPW Centrifugal exhaust fan Central Blower 9B1DD-C1SR 32006 ? 0 T OPW Centrifugal exhaust fan Central Blower 9B1DD-C1SR 1 32007 ? 01 T Side chair with arms, OPW burgundy upholstery Steelcase Tom upholstery 0 T Bookshelf, black painted OPW wood, 5 adj. shelves 36.5 X 72 X 12" O.K. $1 T Bookshelf, wood pattern OPW laminate, 5 adj. shelves 36 X 72 X 12" O.K. $1 T OPW Desk, child -size, wood 24 X 42 X 26" 1 Bad stains 01 T Nicked and OPW Credenza, charcoal laminate 24 X 72 X 29" scratched 0 T Desk return (modifed to stand OPW alone), charcoal lam. 22 X 48 X 29" Bad shape 0 T File drawer, rolling, gray metal Nicked and OPW (no key, one drawer) 13 X 24 x 29" scratched 0 T Steel shelving, adjustable, OPW gray, 4 units various sizes Scrap value 01 T File Cabinet, gray steel, 4 Scratches and OPW drawer vertical legal size Steelcase 18 X 29 X 53" dents 0 T File Cabinet, gray steel, 4 Scratches and OPW drawer vertical legal size Steelcase 18 X 29 X 53" dents 0 T Straight chair, steel with black Cuts in fabric and OPW upholstery United Chair dirty 0 T OPW Washing Machine, 240 V. only ASKO 11505 Needs $300 part scrap only I S File cabinet, black metal, GND 01004/EPD8 legal, 4-drawer vertical Wesco 18 X 28 X 52" 0 T No co-ax coon., GND 03261 Television RCA FFR45OW 145480482 mechanical tuner 0 T GND Check printer, mechanical Paymaster Series 7000 8P138128 $5 T *Disposal Options A Auction B Bid (sealed) I Internet online auction N Newspaper advertisement "For Sale" O Other P Private seller (negotiated price) S Scrapped T Trash can/dumpster (only if meets specific guidelines set forth in the policy) L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0034_1053_Surplus Assets FM 6-12-07.xls 6/15/200711:19 AM Packet Page 244 of 463 Located Asset/ Tag # Property Description Brand Model # Serial # Condition - Working/Not Working/ Broken parts, etc. Est FMV (net disposal costs) Minimum price (if applicable) Disp. Option * Date Approved by Council Date Publically Announced (If N/A, give reason) Date Disposed Buyer / Place Disposed Purchase Price Fund (costs / revenue) GND Aluminum intake/exhaust grilles, 5 ea. 30 X 36" and larger I brand new scrap onlyl S GND Box wrap -around plastic fluorescent fixture lenses 4' length yellow, aged 0 T GND Metal roofing cap material various lengths, new scrap only S GND Lockers old, totally disassembled scrap only S GND Windows var. sizes, shapes new scrap only S *Disposal Options A Auction B Bid (sealed) I Internet online auction N Newspaper advertisement "For Sale" O Other P Private seller (negotiated price) S Scrapped T Trash can/dumpster (only if meets specific guidelines set forth in the policy) L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0034_1053_Surplus Assets FM 6-12-07.xls 6/15/200711:19 AM Packet Page 245 of 463 RE: Research Request Page 1 of 1 Junglov, Kathleen From: Bob Meinig [bmeinig@mrsc.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:38 AM To: Junglov, Kathleen Subject: RE: Research Request Kathleen: The only requirement involving public notice for the disposal of surplus equipment is with respect to "property originally acquired for public utility purposes." RCW 35.94.040 (which applies to code cities like Edmonds via RCW 35A.80.010) states: "Whenever a city shall determine, by resolution of its legislative authority, that any lands, property, or equipment originally acquired for public utility purposes is surplus to the city's needs and is not required for providing continued public utility service, then such legislative authority by resolution and after a public hearing may cause such lands, property, or equipment to be leased, sold, or conveyed. Such resolution shall state the fair market value or the rent or consideration to be paid and such other terms and conditions for such disposition as the legislative authority deems to be in the best public interest." Even though this statute speaks only of the property being "leased, sold, or conveyed," a decision to simply take the stuff to the dump should probably also follow this statute (based on the first phrase of the statute). Since a public hearing is required by this statute with respect to disposal of such property, some sort of public notice of the hearing is required. So, unless the equipment at issue in your inquiry was originally acquired for public utility purposes, no particular public notice is required. Bob Meinig MRSC Legal Consultant -----Original Message ----- From: Name: Kathleen Junglov Title: Asst. Admin. Svcs. Director Phone: 425 775-7743 Email: junglov@ci.edmonds.wa.us Last night at our Council finance committee meeting we requested the committee forward to full council an agenda item which suplused equipment which no longer had any value and was going to go to the dump. A citizen raised the question that he thought a public notice had to be given to surplus equipment. I replied that I thought the notice was only required when selling equipment, but would research. Please advise as to whether or not a public notice is required for the surplusing of equipment. Thanks, Kathleen Packet Page 246 of 463 6/ 14/2007 AM-1034 2.P. Purchase New Street Sweeper Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Kim Karas Submitted For: Noel Miller Time: Consent Department: Public Works Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Purchase (1) one new street sweeper using Washington State Purchasing Contract #07906 for the Public Works Storm Water Division. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to purchase (1) one new Eagle Street Sweeper from Owens Equipment utilizing pricing contained in the Washington State Purchasing Contract #07906. Previous Council Action In the 2007 budget, the City Council allocated funds for the replacement of an existing street sweeper. Narrative Sweeping debris from the City streets is an important element of the City's overall strategy to protect the water quality of the City's streams and the Puget Sound. Storm Water Division Unit #26, a 1994 Elgin Street Sweeper is budgeted for replacement utilizing monies from the 511 Fund ($61,100), budgeted monies from the Storm Division ($125,000) and estimated surplus salvage revenue of ($20,000). Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2007 Revenue: $206,100.00 Expenditure: $196,287.26 Fiscal Impact: 511 replacement B-Fund, Storm Division 411 Utility Operations Fund Attachments Link: Vehicle Description Link: Owen Equipment Quote Link: State Contract for Street Sweeper Form Routing/Status Packet Page 247 of 463 Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 01:38 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Kim Started On: 06/11/2007 08:59 Karas AM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 248 of 463 __j /!§E L()\k(m®!£{ )\}\ \ ' \§;\ / E��k■=r-,l;`-�! }� &ƒ - �! f.- Packet Page 2fllE� t�urprrrEnT May 18, 2007 a=zrigclnmsn-rRL sRLEs - sieRvics • suppLies City of Edmonds Public Works Department 7110-210"i Street SW Edmonds, WA 98026 To: Mr. Dave Sittauer Fleet Maintenance Manager Re: New Elgin Eagle WSDOT Contract # 07906 Base Bid Contract Price $176,000.00 Additional Option Content Water Fill Gauge 470.00 LED Stop, Turn, Tail Lights 470.00 Extended Reach Gutter Broom Curbside 1,100.00 Rear Mount Camera System 1,875.00 Sub Total $179,915.00 WA State Sales Tax (9.1 %) 16,372.26 TOTAL $196,287.26 Lead Time Is Estimated 90-120 Days ARO. F.O.B. City of Edmonds. Sincerely, Glenn Irwin Owen Equipment Sales 800.422.2059 girwin@owenequipment.com Portland 12831 NE Whitaker Way Y PO Box 30959 • Portland, OR 97294 (503) 255-9055 • fax (503) 256-3880 Kent 848 3rd Ave South a Kent, WA 98032 (253) 852-5819 • fax (253) 852-8913 Pack 11b+2'®13MQ1g3ripment.Com State of Washington Current Contract Information Contract number: 07906 Replaces Contract: 10904 Contract title: SWEEPERS -VARIOUS SIZES Commodity Code: 2330 Purpose: CONTRACT AWARD Term: January 1, 2007 through: December 31, 2009 For use by: Department of Transportation and General use: All State Agencies, Political Subdivisions of Washington and Oregon State, Qualified Non- profit Corporations, Materials Management Center, Participating Institutions of Higher Education (College and Universities, Community and Technical Colleges). Contract type: Scope of contract Contractor Address: Products available: Ordering information: Ordering procedures: This contract is designated as convenience use. This contract is awarded to multiple contractors. See Attachment A See Attaclnnent A See Attaclunent B See Page 2 See Attachment A Contact: See Attachment A Phone: See Attachment A FAX: See Attachment A Fed. I.D. No.: See Attachment A Supplier No.: See Attacliment A This page contains key contract features. Find detailed information on succeeding pages. For more information on this contract, or if you have any questions, please contact your local agency Purchasing Office, or you may contact our office at the numbers listed below. Contract Specialist: Kenneth A. Woodfork, CPPB Assistant: Christine Schoepfer Phone Number: (360) 902-7422 Phone Number: (360) 902-7193 Fax Number: (360) 586-2426 Fax Number: 360) 586-2426 Email: kwoodfo@ga.wa.gov Email: CSchoe a.wa. ov Visit our Internet site: h/t1�:/iinjYi>>.gy._im.9017/»roc.htin Packet Page 251 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 2 Payment address: See Attachment A Order placement address: See Attachment A Minimum orders: See Attachment A Delivery time: See Attachment A Payment terms: See Attachment A Contract pricing: Attachment B This is the summary page for Item pricing. Detailed pricing listed under awarded contractor attachments. Contract pricing by Attachment "B1" SahlberR Equipment 1501 Contractor: Attachment -B1" Titan Sales Group 1501 Attachment "13 F Owen Equipment 1501 Attachment "B1" Pape Machinery 1506 Specifications Attachment "C" Specifiations Boiler Plate Attachment "C" Sahlberg Etc uit)ment 1501 Attachment "C"Titan Sales Group 1501 Attaclirnent "C" Owen E ui ment 1501 Attachment "C" Pape Machinery 1506 Term worth: $2,140,000.0012 YEARS Current participation: $0.00 MBE $0.00 WBE $2,140,000.00 OTHER $0.00 EXEMPT MBE 0% WBE 0% OTHER 100% EXEMPT 0% NOTES: I. State Agencies: Submit Order directly to Contractor for processing. Political Subdivisions: Submit orders directly to Contractor referencing State of Washington contract number. If you are unsure of your status in the State Purchasing Cooperative call (360) 902-7415. II. Only authorized purchasers included in the State of Washington Purchasing Cooperative (WSPC) and State of Oregon Cooperative Purchasing Program (DASCPP/0RCPP) listings published and updated periodically by OSP and DAS may purchase from this contract. It is the contractor's responsibility to verify membership of these organizations prior to processing orders received under this contract. A list of Washington members is available on the Internet littp://www.w-Ya.wa.Lov/serviet/PCACoopListSv. and a list of the Oregon members is available at lltip://tpps.das.statC.or.us/purcliasin_,/cooperative/coop-meiui.11tMI contractors shall not process state contract orders from unauthorized users. III. Recognizing that a single brand or manufacture would not satisfy the needs of the state, this contract was competitively awarded for a variety of products in this cintract Every brand or model appearing on this contract was only awarded by manufacture to a single vendor, following the competitive process. Prior to using this contract for a purchase, the end user should evaluate the products, pricing, and services on the contract and make a decision on the ones (s) that best fits their requirements. In each case a note to theirs files should be included communicating how their final choice selection was determined. Packet Page 252 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 3 Special Conditions: 1. Current Contract Information (CCI) This Current Contract Information (Contract A ward Notice) is a multiple award contract. This CCI is subject. to the Standard Terms and Conditions contained in the original 1FB 07906 bid solicitation to include Special Provisions listed below and hereby awards to contractors as follows: A Attachment "A" lists contract suppliers and selected Information: See Attachment A • Attachment "B" provides a summary of front loader item pricing by manufactures: Attachment B ■ Attachment"B1" provides detailed item pricing and options available: Attachment `131" Sahlber+,, Equipment 1501 Attachment "B1" Titan Sales Group 1501 Attachment "I31" Owen Equipment 1501 Attachment "Bl" Pape Machinery 1506 Attachment "C" provides bid specification compliance. Attachment "C" Speculations Boiler Plate Attachment "C" Sahlberg Equipment 1501 Attachment "C"Titan Sales GrOLIP 1501 Attachment "C" Owen Equipment 1501 Attachment "C" Pape Machinery 1506 2. Certificate of Insurance Contractor to furnish to the State Procurement Officer, a copy of a valid Certificate of Insurance listing the State as beneficiary (See Original Bid Document, Section 11, Paragraph 1) within Fifteen (I5) days after Contractor receipt of award notice. 3. Warranty Bidder will submit a copy of warranty with items delivered under this contract. Unless otherwise specified, full parts and labor warranty period shall be for a minimum period of one (1) year after receipt of materials or equipment by the Purchaser. All materials or equipment provided shall be new, unused, of the latest model or design and of recent manufacture In the event of conflict between contract terms and conditions and warranty submitted, to afford the state maximum benefits, the contract terms and conditions shall prevail. 4. Sales and Subcontractor Report A quarterly Sales and Subcontractor Report (attached) shall be submitted in the format provided by the Office of State Procurement. You can get the report electronically at littp:HwNvw.(-Ya.wa.Rov/pea/usaae.doe. Total purchases for each State Agency, University, Community and Technical Colleges must be shown separately. Total purchases for all political subdivisions and non-profit organizations may be summarized as one customer. Additionally, all purchases by the State of Oregon or other purchasers must be reported as an aggregate total. The report shall include sales information (Section A) and amounts paid to each subcontractor during the reporting period (Section B) Reports should be rounded to nearest dollar. Contractors will be provided with all necessary sample forms, instructions, and lists. Reports are due thirty (30) days after the end of the calendar quarter, i.e., April 30th, July 31 st, October 31 st and January 31 st. Packet Page 253 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Attachment"A" Page 4 ATTACHMENT "A" CONTRACT SUPPLIERS SUPPLIER: Owen Equipment Titan Sales Group Salberg Equipment Company ADDRESS: 12831 NE Whitaker Way 18814 72°d Avenue 375 North McNeely Street CITY/STATE: Portland, OR Kent, WA Buckley, WA ZIP CODE: 97230 98032 98321 TELEPHONE: (503) 255-9055 (800) 944-3360 (360) 829-1073 FAX 9: (503) 255-9055 (503) 281-2551 (360) 829-1374 CONTRACTOR CONTACT: Matthew Wlodarezyk Stewart R. Smith Sharon Sahlberg PAYMENT TERMS: Net 30 Days Net 30 Days Net 30 Days LEAD TIME- ARO: 120 Days After Receipt of Order 90-120 Days After Receipt of Order 120-180 Days After Receipt of Order F.O.B.: WSDOT Destinations All Others FOB Dealer WSDOT Destinations All Others FOB Dealer WSDOT Destinations All Others FOB Dealer FREIGHT: Prepaid and included Prepaid and included Prepaid and included MINIMUM ORDER: None None None FED. I.D. NO: 93-0666853 68-0498794 72-1547771 ORDER ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 30959 Portland, OR 97294 2402 NE Columbia RD Portland, OR 97211 375 North McNeely St Buckley, WA 98321 PAYMENT/ ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 30959 Portland, OR 97294 250 Broadalbin St. SW Ste 250 Albany, OR 97321 375 North McNeely St Buckley, WA 98321 OREGON DELIVERY Yes Yes Yes AWARD MANUFACTURE Elgin Schwartze Allianz Packet Page 254 of 463 N o 0 to > O O tl� O p o O CD GQ 0 (D 0 LID d' O O 0) N O OD a. O O o ti 4-1 flD (Y) (D oD (O 1` I� CY) E"} 6a 6 } v1 W ,FD H [u7 O F p W OD (D Q i!J ° 4T N L _N ui Q C) r r r N Z Zz Z z E C E E (D () 0 w O V U •'� ON O C� U r-- c, '+ _ Ca O � E�-4 V U A, Q Packet Page 255 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 9 ATTACHMENT "B 1" OWEN EQUIPMENT Req. Item Comm. I Code Description Unit Unit Price 1. 3825 MECHANICAL SWEEPER WSDOT EACH $176,000.00 SPECIFICATION 1501 Refer to Section 3.3, Specifications. For Product Bid State: Mfg.: Elgin Brand/Model Eagle F Lead-time: Materials, equipment or services will be delivered within calendar 120 days after receipt of order ARO . Options Available for this Unit: Smart Model Back -Up Alarm $200.00 Main Broom Hour Meter $295.00 Upgrade Provided Auto Lube for Chassis $975.00 Debris Hopper Interior Light $485.00 Vogel Auto Lube System (Truck & Sweeper) $8,860.00 LED Stop, Turn, Tail Lights $470.00 Sterling Chassis Fuel Water Separator Racor $1,055.00 Debris Hopper Liner Life Last $3,125.00 Dual Air Horns $645.00 Reflector Set (6) $50.00 Dual Arm Rests/Seats $565.00 Rear Mount Camera System $1,875.00 Heavy Duty AR Conveyor (Lower Roller) $635.00 Extended Reach Gutter Broom Per Side $1,110.00 Slow Moving Emblem $60.00 John Deere 66HP Diesel Engine $695.00 Yellow/Black Chevron Warning Stripes $350.00 Carbide Dirt Shoes $565.00 Battery Disconnect Switch Chassis $415.00 Aux. Engine Block Heater 280.00 Rear Flood Light $140.00 Non PM10 Front Spray Bar $530.00 Water Fill Gauge $470.00 Packet Page 256 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 30 ATTACHMENT "C" OWEN EQUIPMENT 1501 Self-propelled; Mechanical Pickup Specification Requirements Check WSDOT 1501-ITEM 1 If Meet Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed 1. General: I This specification describes the requirements for a dual or single engine X mechanical pick-up type sweeper, 2. Shall have a hopper capacity of 4 cubic yards (+ or - 1/2 yard) with the ability to X legally carry 9,000 lbs. payload. 3. The sweeper shall be designed and configured to maximize the unit's payload capacity, while meeting the requirements of the Washington X State bridge law, and federally mandated weight standards 4. The successful bidder will be required to deliver the completed unit to one of the X delivery locations annotated below. a. 6431 Corson Ave. Seattle Wa. 98108 b. 1551 North Wenatchee Ave. Wenatchee Wa. 98807 c. 5720 Capitol Blvd. Tumwater Wa. 98501 d. 4200 Main St. Vancouver Wa. 98668 e. 2809 Rudkin Rd. Union Gap Wa. 98909-2560 f. 221 E. North Foothills Dr. Spokane Wa. X 99207-2090 H. Cab & Chassis: 1. ShaIl be a pressurized, all steel, dual operator, X cab equipped as follows. a. Factory installed air conditioning. X b. Fresh air heater, and ventilators. X c. Side window defoggers. X d. All glass shall be tinted and shatterproof X e. Cloth -covered air ride seats, with head restraints, and compatible three-point lap X and shoulder seat belts. Packet Page 257 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 31 Check Specification Requirements If Meet WSDOT 1501-ITEM 1 Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed f Dual heated and remote controlled west coast type mirrors; with 10 inch round sweeping mirrors affixed to them. X g. Intermittent electric windshield wipers with windshield washer capability. X h_ Dash mounted AM/FM radio. X 2. The cab pressurization systems shall be a stand-alone system. The A/C system will not X be used to pressurize the cab. 3. The noise level inside the cab, at full highway operation, shall not exceed 85 dba. X 4. All gauges and switches shall be mounted in a manner that provides viewing from either operating position. X 5. Gauges will include:. X a. Fuel gauge X b. Water temperature X C. Oil pressure X d. Voltmeter X e. Speedometer -odometer X f. Tachometer X g. Hour meter X h. Air pressure gauge X 6. Shall have an automatic audible and visual engine high water temperature, low oil pressure warning system X M. Enein;e/Transmission: 1. Shall be a Cummins turbo diesel or equal with at lest 200 HP, at 2300 rpm; with the following items: X a. Engine Brake (if available from Chassis Not available from Chassis OEM OEM) For After arket Add $1.800.00 b. Cold Weather Starting aid X c. Dual stage dry air cleaner X d. Dash mounted air restriction gauge. X c. An externally mounted turbo pre -cleaner. X Packet Page 258 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Pa e 32 Specification Requirements Cheek WSDOT 1501-ITEM 1 If Meet Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed 2. Shall have an Allison automatic transmission with four forward and one reverse speed, with oil cooler. IV. Axles / Suspension and Steering: I. Shall have an industry standard truck suspension that is sufficiently rated for the GV WR of the unit, and is configured to maximize the unit's load capacity, while meeting bridge weight Iaw. 2. The drive differential shall be geared for a minimum of 60 mph. 3. Shall provide option pricing for a two -speed rear axle. (Low/High) 4. Shall have left and right (dual), power steering systems. V. Tires & Brakes: 1. Shall have radial tires on all wheels. 0 X X Two speed rear axles is standard X equipment. No extra charge K4 M 2. Tire size, load range, and ply will be matched on each axle, and they shall be sufficient to X maximize load capacity while meeting the bridge weight law. 3. Tires and wheels will be properly balanced X and the front axle aligned prior to delivery. 4. Shall have standard air service brakes; with X "S" cam actuators. 5. Parking brake shall be the manufacturer's X standard. 6. The system's air compressor must produce 15 efm. X 7. ShaI be equipped with a Wabco System Saver 1200 air dryer. WSDOT will accept a Bendix AD-9 air dryer if the Wabco is not X available. VI. Electrical System: 1. Shall be a 12-volt system. X 2. The batteries shall be BCI Group size 31 and maintenance -free delivering 650 CCA per X battery. 3. The battery box cover shall be the X manufacturers standard. Packet Page 259 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 33 Specification Requirements Check WSDOT 1501-ITEM 1 If Meet Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed 4. The batteries shall be equipped with an additional ground cable, which will be X attached to the frame rail. 5. All cable ends shall be sealed, and equipped X with rubber retainers and covers. 6. All battery cables exiting the battery box X shall be routed through rubber grommets. 7. Shall have weather resistant wires X and couplings that are color -coded or numbered for easy identification. 8. All circuits shall be protected with manual re- X settable circuit breakers and or fuses. 9. The unit shall be equipped with an audible backup alarm. X 10. All wiring shall be professionally routed and X bundled in such a manner to maximize wiring protection. VII. Li6tine Svstem: 1. Shall have a spotlight for each gutter broom, X and one for the rear broom. 2. Shall be equipped with two cab controlled amber strobe lights located at the front upper X corners of the cab, with 360-degree visibility when the unit is in travel mode. 3. Shall be equipped with two cab controlled alternating amber strobe -warning lights X mounted on the rear of the unit, in close proximity to the taillights. 4. Bidders shall provide add or deduct pricing for a Federal signal Model 100 (44311202) X rotating Beacon lights in lieu of the strobe lights front and rear. 5. Shall have a cab controlled National Signal 2005640 arrow board or equal. The board X will raise and lower using an electric worm gear Dayton actuator with cab controls. The board shall be installed on the upper rear portion of the unit. Deduct $102.00 Packet Page 260 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 34 Specification Requirements Check WSDOT 1541-ITEM 1 If Meet Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed VIII. Sweeper Engine: (For Dual Engine Units Only) l . Shall be a liquid cooled (Oil or Water) diesel engine developing at least 4911P. Provide X option pricing for the manufacturers largest HP auxiliary. engine. 2. The auxiliary engine must provide smooth X operation with no engine vibration. 3. Shall have a heavy-duty dry type air cleaner, X and pre -cleaner 4. Shall be equipped with a cab mounted air filter restriction gauge. X S. Gauges shall be cab mounted and include: X a. Water or oil temperature X b. Oil pressure X c. Tachometer X d. Hour meter X 6. Shall have an automatic high water or high oil temperature, low oil pressure, audible and visual engine warning and shutdown X system IX. Hydraulic System: 1. ShalI have a direct drive gear or piston pump capable of providing hydraulic power sufficient to fully operate the brooms, X elevator system simultaneously. 2. The hydraulic system shall be protected with X a system overload shut down feature. 3. FiItering will be provided on both the suction X and return sides of the system. X. Debris Pickup System: 1. ShalI have left and right side, power driven„ power lift and replaceable gutter brooms. X 2. Both gutter brooms shall be free floating, X with cab controlled reverse and variable speed. 3. Both the left and right side gutter brooms shall be equipped with a cab controlled tilt X feature. Packet Page 261 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 35 Specification Requirements Check WSDOT 1501-ITEM 1 If Meet Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed 4. Both gutter brooms shall have a cab x controlled down pressure feature. 5. The main broom shall be power driven full floating and replaceable. x 6. The main broom shall be equipped with cab - operated raise, down pressure, and variable speed controls. x 7. Shall have a Jammed Elevator warning device mounted in the cab. x 8. ShaIl be equipped with an elevator flushing system. x 9. Shall have the ability to raise 9,000 pounds to a height of I 1 feet measured from the bottom of the discharge door to the ground and dump the load to the right side of the unit. x 10. Bidders shall supply option pricing to have load -viewing capability from cab. x Standard Equipment 11. Shall be equipped with an automatic lubrication system. x 12. Shall be equipped with a dash mounted "Load Weight" or "Full Load" indicator x light. 13. The debris pickup system will have the ability to engage or disengage with one switch or one button. x 14. The debris pickup system will meet PM 10 requirements. x XI. Water System; 1. Shall have a water tank capacity of at least 200 gallons, (+ Or — 10 gallons), with anti siphon capability. x 280 gallons of water provided 2. The water tank (s) shall be comprised of a non -corrosive and non -rusting material. x 3. Shall have water spray nozzles located over the gutter brooms and a bar across the front with on/off and volume controls. Provide option pricing for a water spray system for the main broom. x 4. Shall have a cab mounted low water indicator. x Packet Page 262 of 463 Current Contract Information CONTRACT 07906 Page 36 Specification Requirements Check WSDOT 1501-ITEM 1 If Meet Describe Offered Alternatives OWEN EQUIPMENT or Exceed XII. Exterior Finish: WSDOT expects professional workmanship on all products purchased. With this in mind, the following finishing requirements will be closely scrutinized during the specification X compliance inspection. 1. There shall be no welding scale, roughness, X sharp corners; or rust stains on the unit. 2. The unit shall be coated with 2 mils dry automotive quality primers, with an additional 2 mils dry of the manufacturer's X standard color. 3. The body paint shall be warranted against X rust and corrosion for five years. XIII. Options Bidders are encouraged to provide optional pricing for items and or features that pertain to this unit. X XIV. Publications 5. Each unit shall be delivered with an operator's manual. X 6. Total quantity of Service and Parts Manuals or CD's shall be provided as annotated below. I Parts Manual or CD (Per Unit) X 1 Service Manual or CD (Per Unit) X Packet Page 263 of 463 AM-1052 2.Q. Interfund Loan Ordinance Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Kathleen Junglov Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Interfund Loan Ordinance Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve Interfund Loan Ordinance Previous Council Action Finance Committee June 12, 2007 Narrative Currently the Interfund Loan Program is administered under Ordinance #3431 as codified in ECC 03.22.010. As written, both address establishing Interfiand Loans in situations that are now infrequent in nature or no longer applicable. Administrative Services is requesting the Ordinance and Code be modified to allow the Administrative Services Director to establish Interfund loans as may be required by situations presented, with quarterly reporting to Council as part of the Quarterly Budget Reports. A total of three Interfand Loans have been established in the last three years. Link: Interfund Loan Ordinance Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Dan Clements 06/14/2007 10:07 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 10:32 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Kathleen Started On: 06/14/2007 09:49 Junglov AM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 264 of 463 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3.22 INTERFUND LOANS TO AUTHORIZE IN GENERAL THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR TO MAKE INTERFUND LOANS BETWEEN FUNDS AS NEEDED, AND TO MODIFY FREQUENCY OF REPORTING, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, it has been the City's experience that interfund loans are not required to cover deficit in the general fund; and WHEREAS, it has been the City's experience that in most situations when interfund loans are needed, the emergency financial reserve fund No. 006 is administratively no a practical lender fund; and WHEREAS, it has been the City's experience that interfund loans are more commonly made between other City funds unrelated to the general fund or the emergency financial reserve fund No. 006, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it appropriate to authorize the Administrative Services Director to administer the interfund loan program, subject to regular reporting to the City Council, on an "as needed" basis to keep the different funds of the City solvent, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: - 1 - L:\Productiondb\CCOLJNCIL\0041-1052-Interfund Loan Ordinance.DOC Packet Page 265 of 463 Section 1. ECC 3.22.010 Interfund loans authorized is hereby amended by to read as follows: as follows: 3.22.010 Interfund loans authorized. The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to administer an interfund loan program. The Administrative Services Director shall make interfund loans as needed to keep the funds of the City solvent. In conjunction with interfund loans, the Administrative Services Director shall prepare a planned schedule of repayment of the loan principal plus applicable interest. A reasonable rate of interest based on external rate available to the City shall be charged by the lending fund, unless the borrowing fund has no other source of revenue other than the lending fund, or is normally funded by the lending fund. In addition, the borrowing fund must anticipate sufficient revenues to be in a position over the period of the loan to make the specified principal and interest payments. Section 2. ECC 3.22.020 Report to the City Council is hereby amended by to read 3.22.020 Report to the City Council. The Administrative Services Director shall, as needed but not less frequently than once a quarter, include a report of any such loans and subsequent repayments to the City Council in conjunction with the Administrative Services Director's quarterly budget reports to the City Council. Any City Council member may request or the Mayor direct the Administrative Services Director to make such additional reports as may be necessary to fully inform the City Council of any revenue deficit or interfund loan or similar transfer. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is an administrative and legislative act not subject to - 2 - L:\Productiondb\CCOLJNCIL\0041-1052-Interfund Loan Ordinance.DOC Packet Page 266 of 463 referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IB'd W. Scott Snyder - 3 - L:\Productiondb\CCOLJNCIL\0041-1052-Interfund Loan Ordinance.DOC Packet Page 267 of 463 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3.22 INTERFUND LOANS TO AUTHORIZE IN GENERAL THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR TO MAKE INTERFUND LOANS BETWEEN FUNDS AS NEEDED, AND TO MODIFY FREQUENCY OF REPORTING, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 92007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP663812.DOC;1/00006.900030/}- 4 - Packet Page 268 of 463 AM-1054 2.R. Rezoning Properties on the West Side of Sunset Ave N from RS-6 to OR Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Rob Chave Submitted For: Rob Chave Time: Consent Department: Planning Type: Action Review Committee: A rtinn Information Subject Title Proposed Ordinance rezoning certain real property from Single -Family Residential (RS-6) to Office -Residential (OR) for certain properties located on the west side of Sunset Avenue North, and south of Bell Street. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the proposed ordinance drafted by the City Attorney (Exhibit 1). Previous Council Action City Council held a closed record review of the proposal on June 5, 2007. Narrative This is an administrative rezone from RS-6 to OR for properties designated in the Comprehensive Plan for "Planned Residential -Office" use. The City Council held a closed record review of the proposal on June 5, 2007, and directed the City Attorney to draft an ordinance to complete the change in zoning. The proposed ordinance is attached as Exhibit 1. Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance Route Seq Inbox 1 City Clerk 2 Mayor 3 Final Approval Form Started By: Rob Chave Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Approved By Date Status Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 01:03 PM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Started On: 06/14/2007 11:42 AM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 269 of 463 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 6/8/07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-6) TO OFFICE - RESIDENTIAL (OR) FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SUNSET AVENUE NORTH, AND SOUTH OF BELL STREET, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, a closed record review was held before the Edmonds City Council on the rezone of certain real property located on the west side of Sunset Avenue North, south of Bell Street as described in File No. R-07-14, and WHEREAS, this matter came to the City Council on the record of a hearing before the Planning Board and with the recommendation of the Planning Board that the property should be rezoned from single-family residential (RS-6) to office -residential (OR), and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the public interest to rezone the property, adopting the findings and conclusions set forth in the staff report dated April 25, 2007 and attached as Exhibit 2 in the record before the Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Certain real property located on the west side of Sunset Avenue North, south of Bell Street in the City of Edmonds, Washington, and more particularly described in File No. R-07-14 is hereby rezoned from single-family residential (RS-6) to office -residential (OR). {WSS664592.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Page 270 of 463 Section 2. The Development Services Director or his designee is hereby authorized to amend the City's zoning map to show this change in designation. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS664592.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 271 of 463 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-6) TO OFFICE - RESIDENTIAL (OR) FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SUNSET AVENUE NORTH, AND SOUTH OF BELL STREET, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS664592.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 - Packet Page 272 of 463 AM-1055 Adoption of 2006 International Building and Fire Codes Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: Submitted By: Department: Review Committee: Action: Subject Title 06/19/2007 Duane Bowman Development Services Information Time: Consent Type: 2.5. Proposed Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code, Title 19, to adopt the 2006 International Building Code, 2006 International Residential Code, 2006 International Fire Code, 2006 International Mechanical Code, 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code, 2006 Energy Code, the 2006 State Ventilation and Indoor Quality Code, and other State Codes adopted pursuant to the State Building Code, along with certain amendments to existing City Codes in said Title in order to correct scrivener's errors, grammatical changes, cross reference changes and providing wording clarifications. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Adopt the proposed ordinance. Previous Council Action On May 8, 2007, there was a joint meeting of the Community Services/Development Services and Public Safety Committees to review the proposed changes to the 2006 International Fire, building and supplemental Codes. The committees recommended the matter be forwarded to the full Council for review at a public hearing. On June 5, 2007, the City Council conducted a public hearing and directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance adopting the new codes (Exhibit 1). Narrative The State Building Code Council has approved State wide adoption of the Building, Fire and Supplemental construction Codes (effective July 1, 2007). The City needs to formalize the State adoption of the following: 2006 International Building Code 2006 International Residential Code 2006 International Fire Code 2006 International Mechanical Code 2006 International Fuel Gas Code 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code 2006 State Energy Code 2006 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code There are no substantive changes to the codes but wording clarifications, grammatical changes, and cross-referencing changes have been made. Packet Page 273 of 463 Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 01:48 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Duane Started On: 06/14/2007 01:30 Bowman PM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 274 of 463 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 6/08/07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, TITLE 19, TO ADOPT THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2006 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, 2006 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE AND FUEL GAS CODE, 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 2006 STATE ENERGY CODE, THE 2006 STATE VENTILATION AND INDOOR QUALITY CODE, AND OTHER STATE CODES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE STATE BUILDING CODE, ALONG WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING CITY CODES IN SAID TITLE IN ORDER TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, GRAMMATICAL CHANGES, CROSS REFERENCE CHANGES AND PROVIDING WORDING CLARIFICATIONS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the State Building Code Council has approved statewide adoption of the Building, Fire and Supplemental Construction Codes, and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt these changes prior to the effective date of July 1, 2007 of the State codes, WHEREAS, the City Council, following public hearing, deems it to be in the public interest to adopt such codes, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code, Title 19, is hereby repealed and reenacted to read in the following format: {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Page 275 of 463 Chapter 19.00 BUILDING CODE Sections: 19.00.000 International Building Code adopted. 19.00.005 Section amendments. 19.00.010 Work exempt from permit. 19.00.015 Fully complete application. 19.00.020 Concurrent review. 19.00.025 Architectural design review — Optional vesting. 19.00.030 Demolition permits. 19.00.000 International Building Code adopted. A. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.027, 19.27.074, and RCW 70.92 the 2006 Edition of the International Building Code (IBC) as published by the International Code Council (ICC), including the state amendments set forth in RCW 34.05 and Chapter 51-50 WAC, including the following appendices: E (Supplementary Accessibility Requirements), G (Flood -Resistant Construction), H (Signs), and J (Grading) is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the building code of the city of Edmonds. The provisions of this code shall regulate the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, equipment, use, area and maintenance of buildings and structures in the city; and provide for the issuance of permits and the collection of permit fees. B. Referenced Codes. Where the following codes are referenced within any of the codes adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19, they shall be substituted as follows: 1. "International Building Code" shall mean the building code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 2. "International Residential Code" shall mean the residential building code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 3. "International Mechanical Code" shall mean the mechanical code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 4. "International Fuel Gas Code" shall mean the fuel gas code as adopted in Chapter 19.27 RCW and in accordance with the mechanical code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 5. "International Fire Code" shall mean the fire code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 276 of 463 -2- 6. "Uniform Plumbing Code" shall mean the plumbing code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 7. "Washington State Energy Code" shall mean the energy code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 8. The "National Electrical Code" shall mean the electrical code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 9. "Uniform Housing Code" shall mean the housing code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 10. "Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings" shall mean the dangerous buildings code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 11. "State Historic Building Code" shall mean the historic building code as adopted and amended in ECDC Title 19. 12. "Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code" shall mean the ventilation code as adopted and amended by ECDC Title 19. 13. International Existing Building Code: Not adopted. A11 references shall be disregarded. 14 International Property Maintenance Code: Not adopted. All references shall be disregarded. 15. International Electrical Code: Not adopted. All references shall be disregarded. These codes shall be considered part of the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of each such reference. 19.00.005 Section amendments. The following sections of the IBC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section 104.3 Notices and orders. The building official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with this code. The building official is also authorized to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code compliance in addition to the remedies provided for in this code. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 277 of 463 2. Section 105.1.1 Annual permit. Deleted. 3. Section 105.1.2 Annual permit records. Deleted. 4. Section 105.2 Work exempt from permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.010. 5. Section 105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application. a. Applications, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. b. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days prior to such expiration date. C. No application shall be extended more than once for a total application life of 360 days. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on any applicable code or ordinance change, and pay new plan review fees. 6. Section 105.5 Permit expiration and extension. a. Every permit issued under ECDC Title 19 shall expire by limitation 360 days after issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)(b) and ECDC 19.10.010A4(a). b. The following permits shall expire by limitation, 180 days after issuance and may not be extended: i. Demolition permits required by ECDC 19.00.030. ii. Permits for Moving Buildings required by Chapter 19.60 ECDC. permits. iii. Mechanical permits. iv. Tank removal, tank fill, or tank placement V. Grading, excavation and fill pen -nits. vi. Water service line permits. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - Packet Page 278 of 463 vii. Plumbing permits. viii. Gas piping permits. ix. Deck and dock permits. X. Fence permits. xi. Re -roof permits. xii. Rockery and retaining wall permits. xiii. Swimming pool, hot tub and spa permits. xiv. Sign permits. xv. Shoring permits. xvi. Foundation permits. C. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an extension for an additional year. If the plans and specifications for the permit extension application are the same as the plans and specifications submitted for the original permit application and provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one half the original building permit fee to extend the permit. d. If the applicant cannot complete work issued under an extended permit within a total period of two (2) years, the applicant may request in writing, prior to the second year expiration, an extension for a third and final year. Provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended for a third and final year. In lieu of permit fees for the third year extension, inspection fees shall be charged for the remaining work based on the number of required inspections remaining for the project for all city departments. e. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit shall be required, with full permit fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The voiding of the prior permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or building codes. Whenever {WSS664610BOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Page 279 of 463 an appeal is filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with ECDC 20.105.020(B), the time limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision. f. The building official may reject requests for permit extension where he determines that modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and building codes have occurred since the original issuance of the permit and/or modifications or amendments would significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of a new permit. 7. Section 105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit. a. In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit application with full permit fees shall be submitted to the building official. b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and building codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is sought to recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under the codes in effect when an application for a new permit is submitted which fully complies with ECDC 19.00.015. When additional plan review is required, plan review fees shall be charged. 8. Section 106.3.3 Phased approval for multi -family and commercial development. a. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction as part of a development before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure have been approved provided architectural design board approval has been granted. b. Phased approval means permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer and fire marshal, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements including, but not limited to; curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage have been signed as approved by the city engineer. C. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - Packet Page 280 of 463 cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the improvements. 9. Section 107 Temporary structures and uses. Deleted. 10. Section 108 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC. 11. Section 112 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. B. Chapter 5 General Building Heights and Areas. 1. Section 501.2 Premises identification. Approved numbers or addresses shall be installed by the property owner for new buildings in such a position as to be clearly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property. Letters or numbers shall be a minimum six (6) inches in height and stroke a minimum of .75 inch of a contrasting color to the building base color. C. Chapter 31 Special Construction. 1. Section 3103 Temporary structures. Deleted. 2. Section 3108.1.1 Radio, television and cellular communication related equipment and devices. a. A permit is required for the installation or relocation of commercial radio, television or cellular tower support structures including monopoles, guyed or lattice towers, whip antennas, panel antennas, parabolic antennas and related accessory equipment, and accessory equipment shelters (regardless of size) including roof mounted equipment shelters. 3. Section 3109.1 Applicability and maintenance. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas of all occupancies shall comply with the requirements of this section and other applicable sections of this code. a. It is the responsibility of the owner to maintain the swimming pool, hot tub or spa in a clean and sanitary condition and all equipment maintained in a satisfactory operating condition when the swimming pool, hot tub or spa is in use. A swimming pool, hot tub or spa that is neglected, not secured from public entry and/or not maintained shall be determined to be a hazard to health and safety and shall be properly mitigated to the satisfaction of the building official. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 - Packet Page 281 of 463 4. Section 3109.1.1 Permit required. It shall be unlawful for any person to install, remove, alter, fill with material other than water, repair or replace any swimming pool, hot tub or spa in a building or on premises without first obtaining a permit to do such work from the building official. Reference ECDC 19.00.010(K) for permit exemptions. 5. Section 3109.3 Public swimming pools. Deleted. 6. Section 3109.4 Residential swimming pools. Deleted. 7. Section 3109.6 Fences and gates. a. The swimming pool area shall be completely surrounded by a substantial fence at least six (6) feet in height. No openings shall be greater than two (2) inches, and a self -closing, self -latching gate shall be provided, with an inside lock inaccessible to children aged five (5) years or younger. b. The gate shall be securely locked when the swimming pool is unattended. C. Any swimming pool not presently fenced as required by this section shall be fenced within sixty (60) days of this code adoption. 8. Section 3109.7 Location and setbacks. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas shall meet requirements of the zoning code of the city of Edmonds. a. Minimum setbacks are measured from property lines to the inside face of the pool, hot tub or spa as required by the zoning code for accessory structures. b. All other accessory buildings and equipment shall meet the normally required setbacks for accessory structures in the zone in which they are located. 9. Section 3109.8 Equipment foundations and enclosures. a. All mechanical equipment supported from the ground shall rest on level concrete or other approved base extending not less than three (3) inches above the adjoining ground level. b. All heating and electrical equipment, unless approved for outdoor installation, shall be adequately protected against the weather or installed within a building. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 282 of 463 10. Section 3109.9 Accessibility and clearances. Equipment shall be so installed as to provide accessibility for cleaning, operating, maintenance, and servicing. 11. Section 3 109. 10 Tests and cross connection devices. a. All swimming pool, hot tub and spa piping shall be inspected and approved before being covered or concealed. b. Washington State Department of Health approved cross connection devices are required to be provided when used to fill any swimming pool, hot tub or spa. 12. Section 3109.11 Wastewater disposal. A means of disposal of the total contents of the swimming pool, hot tub or spa (including partial or periodic emptying) shall be reviewed and approved by the public works director. a. No direct connection shall be made between any swimming pool, hot tub or spa to any storm drain, city sewer main, drainage system, seepage pit, underground leaching pit, or sub -soil drain. b. A sanitary tee (outside cleanout installed on the main building side sewer line) shall be provided for draining of treated water into the city sanitary sewer system. 13. Section 3109.12 Inspection requirements. The appropriate city inspector shall be notified for the following applicable inspections: a. Footing, wall, pre -form, pre-gunite, erosion control, underground plumbing, sanitary extension and cleanout, mechanical pool equipment, gas piping, mechanical enclosure location, cross connection and final inspection. b. An initial cross connection control installation inspection is required by the city cross connection control specialist prior to final installation approval. C. All backflow assemblies shall be tested by state certified backflow assembly testers upon initial installation and then annually thereafter. Copies of all test reports shall be submitted to the city water division for review and approval. D. Appendix E Accessibility Requirements. 1. Section E107 Signage. Deleted. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - Packet Page 283 of 463 2. Section E108 Bus stops. Deleted. 3. Section E110 Airports. Deleted. 4. Section E 111 Referenced Standards. Deleted. E. Appendix H Signs. 1. Section H101.2 Signs exempt from permits. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.010(Q). 2. Section H101.2.1 Prohibited signs. a. It is unlawful for any person to advertise or display any visually communicated message, by letter or pictorially, of any kind on any seating bench, or in direct connection with any bench. b. All signs not expressly permitted by Chapter 20.60 ECDC. C. Signs which the city engineer determines to be a hazard to vehicle or pedestrian traffic because they resemble or obscure a traffic control device, or pose a hazard to a pedestrian walkway or because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic passage. Such signs shall be immediately removed at the request of the city engineer. d. All signs which are located within a public right-of- way and that have been improperly posted or displayed are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to immediate removal and confiscation per ECDC 20.60.090. 3. Section H104 Identification. Deleted. 4. Section HI06.1.1 Internally illuminated signs. Deleted. 5. Section H107 Combustible materials. Deleted. 6. Section H108 Animated devices. Deleted. 7. Section H109.1 Height restrictions. Deleted. 8. Section H110 Roof signs. Deleted. F. Appendix J Grading. 1. Section J103.2 Exemptions. Replaced by 19.00.010(M). {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 - Packet Page 284 of 463 19.00.010 Work exempt from permit. IBC Section 105.2 is replaced with the following: Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant's responsibility to comply with bulk zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless subject to the provisions of ECDC Title 23 or limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. A. One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured to the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 120 square feet, with a maximum eave of thirty (30) inches. B. Fences not over six (6) feet high; provided a permit is not required by Chapter 17.30 ECDC. C. Movable cases, counters and partitions not over five (5) feet nine (9) inches high. D. Retaining walls four feet (4) in height or less measured vertically from the finished grade at the exposed toe of the retaining wall to the highest point in the wall, unless: 1. Supporting a surcharge; or 2. Impounding Class I, II, III -A liquids; or 3. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC. E. Rockeries. F. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 500 gallons and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two (2) to one (1). G. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 285 of 463 H. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish work. I. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery. J. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes. K. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to an occupancy in which the pool walls are entirely above the adjacent grade and the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons. Hot tubs and spas less than 5,000 gallons, completely supported by the ground. L. Swings and other playground equipment accessory to an occupancy. M. Grading less than fifty (50) cubic yards (placed, removed or moved within any 365 day period) unless subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC. N. Repair of appliances which do not alter original approval, certification, listing or code. O. Replacement or adding new insulation with no drywall removal or placement. P. Replacement or repair of existing gutters or downspouts. Q. The following types of signs are exempt from permit requirements except that dimensional size and placement standards shall comply with Chapter 20.60 ECDC: 1. Replacing the panel on a previously permitted existing wall cabinet or pole sign, 2. Repainting an existing previously permitted wood sign 3. Painted or vinyl lettering on storefront windows 4. Governmental signs, campaign signs, official public notices, and signs required by provision of local, state, or federal law, 5. Temporary signs announcing the sale or rent of property and other temporary signs as described in ECDC 20.60.080, {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 - Packet Page 286 of 463 6. Signs erected by the transportation authorities, and temporary seasonal and holiday displays. R. Television antennas less than thirty-nine (39) inches in diameter. 19.00.015 Fully complete application. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant's rights shall vest when a fully complete building permit application is filed. A fully complete building permit application is an application executed by the owners of the property for which the application is submitted or the duly authorized agent(s) for such owners, containing each and every document required under the terms of these ordinances and the IBC and is substantially complete in all respects. It is anticipated that minor changes or revisions may be required and are frequently made in the course of any building application review process, and such minor revisions or changes shall not keep an application from being deemed complete if a good faith attempt has been made to submit a substantially complete application containing all required components. Where required, the application and supporting documents shall be stamped and/or certified by the appropriate engineering, surveying or other professional consultants. A fully complete building permit application shall be accompanied by all fees, including but not limited to building permit fees and plan review fees required under the provisions of this chapter and code. 19.00.020 Concurrent review. An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing; provided, that any building permit application submitted concurrently with an application for discretionary permit or approvals shall not be considered complete unless the applicant submits a signed statement, on a form approved by the director, which acknowledges that the building permit application is subject to any conditions or requirements imposed pursuant to the review and approval of any necessary or required discretionary permit or approvals. The applicant shall solely bear the risk of building permit submittal with discretionary permit approval. If after discretionary approval, the building permit plans are modified or amended to comply with conditions or restrictions required by any discretionary permit or approval, the applicant shall be solely responsible for any and all costs which {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - Packet Page 287 of 463 result therefrom, including but not limited to additional full plan review fees; provided further, that any applicant -initiated changes made after the original plan review is complete shall also require payment of full plan review fees. 19.00.025 Architectural design review — Optional vesting. In addition to the vesting rights created by RCW 19.27.095 and ECDC 19.00.015, an applicant for development as defined in ECDC 20.10.010 and subject to architectural design board (ADB) review may, at the applicant's option, file a fully complete augmented architectural design review application (hereinafter "augmented ADB application") and vest rights including applicable permit, development and impact fees under the provisions of the ECDC and the state building code as adopted and amended by the city of Edmonds, ECDC Title 19 as then in effect, to, but only to, the extent that the application provides full and detailed information necessary to confirm the particular regulation to be vested. The burden is on the applicant to provide such detail. A. A fully complete, augmented application for architectural design review shall consist of a complete application for architectural design review, executed by each and every property owner of record of the development site or their duly authorized agent(s), accompanied by the following: l . All fees required by ordinance, including impact mitigation fees, to be deposited at the time such State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements become final. 2. A site plan showing the current zoning of the development site, the footprint of all proposed structures, the total square footage and use of each floor, all setbacks required by either the zoning code or state building codes, proposed parking configurations, and exits. 3. Elevation drawings showing the original grade of the site, any proposed alterations to grade, the proposed height of the structure and the number of stories. 4. A letter executed by all owners of record or their duly authorized agent(s) detailing the proposed use in sufficient detail to determine whether the proposed use complies with the zoning code then in effect and with the building code then in effect to determine type of construction and occupancy classifications of the IBC and IFC as those codes then in effect. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 14 - Packet Page 288 of 463 5. A building permit application, as described in IBC Section 105.3 as the same exists or is hereafter amended, and all building permit and plan review fees as established and set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC; provided, that the plans required by IBC Section 106, as the same exists or is hereafter amended, and other engineering documents, plans or drawings required by ECDC Title 18 may be submitted within 90 days of final ADB approval, or final approval on appeal. B. Upon filing of the augmented ADB application, the applicant shall be deemed fully vested as if a fully complete building permit application had been filed; provided: 1. The burden shall be upon the applicant to supply all material required by the provisions of this section and as necessary to meet the requirements of Chapter 20.10 ECDC. The applicant may supplement the original application in the event an application is deemed incomplete by the development services director or designee. Vesting shall occur only when the application is deemed complete by the development services director. Failure to supplement an incomplete application within 90 days of final ADB approval shall result in forfeiture of all fees paid and no vesting right shall attach. 2. The application shall expire along with all rights vested 180 days following the date of application if final architectural design approval is not received. a. The development services director or designee may issue an extension for an additional period, not exceeding 180 days, upon written request by the applicant(s) or their agent(s). Such request for extension shall be filed prior to the expiration of the original application time period. An extension shall be granted if the architectural design board has not yet considered the application or an appeal thereof is pending. b. The time period shall run concurrently with the periods established by ECDC 19.00.005 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. No application shall be extended more than once. In order to renew an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit all required information and pay a new plan review fee. 3. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of state law and regulation and this code regarding SEPA review. Review periods or delays occasioned by SEPA shall stay the time periods set by this chapter. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 15 - Packet Page 289 of 463 4. Following final ADB approval, the applicant shall file the plans and information required by IBC Section 106. It is anticipated that minor adjustments and changes may and are usually required to the plans submitted as a result of the plan review and administrative process; provided, that the following changes shall not be considered "minor" and shall forfeit vesting rights, and shall require the filing of a new application: a. Any substantial change not required by the terms of ADB approval. b. Any increase in height or total square footage or any change which would change the occupancy classification for the purposes of the state building code. 5. Any decision of the city staff regarding the application stated in this section and its interpretation shall be appealable only to the superior court of Snohomish County by Land Use Petition Act and is not subject to the provisions of Chapter 20.105 ECDC. C. The rights vested by ECDC 19.00.015 and this section refer only to zoning and building code rights protected by RCW 19.27.095. D. These sections shall not be interpreted to create vesting rights not protected by RCW 19.27.095 and shall not be interpreted as a further limitation on the administrative obligations and legislative powers of the city. By way of illustration and not limitation, this chapter does not limit: 1. The city council's authority to create local improvement districts. 2. The city council's authority to legislate life safety requirements that are not required to recognize existing vested rights. 3. Environmental and shorelines review and mitigation procedures. 19.00.030 Demolition permits. Before the partial or complete demolition of any building or structure (interior or exterior), a demolition permit shall be obtained from the building official. The permit fee is hereby established as set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. The applicant shall also post with the city, prior to permit issuance, a performance bond, or frozen fund, conforming to Chapter 17.10 {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 16 - Packet Page 290 of 463 ECDC herein, in an amount to be determined by the building official to satisfy all city requirements no later than 180 days after the issuance of the permit. The demolition performance bond or frozen fund shall not be released until the building official determines the following requirements have been completed: A. Cap Abandoned Sanitary Sewers. Septic tanks are to be pumped, collapsed and removed and/or filled with earth, sand, concrete, CDF or hard slurry. B. Knock Down of Concrete Foundation Walls, Porches, Chimneys and Similar Structures. Concrete, bricks, cobbles and boulders shall be broken to less than 12-inch diameter. Debris left on site shall conform to IBC Section 1803.2 for clean fill. C. Construction debris, vegetation, and garbage attributable to the demolition shall be removed from the site and from unopened street right of way within 30 days of written notice. No debris of any kind may be placed on street right of way (including alleys) without a right-of-way permit. D. Repair of any damage to, and restoration of, any public property to substantially original conditions, i.e., alley, street, sidewalk, landscaping, water meter, utilities, rockeries, retaining walls, etc. E. Grading of Site Back to Original Topography Grades. Basements shall be filled and compacted to 90 percent to be verified by special inspector. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils need to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill should be clean and free draining and should be placed above unyielding native site soils and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent modified proctor, per ASTM D 1557. F. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control is installed and maintained per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Chapter 19.05 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE Sections: 19.05.000 International Residential Code adopted. 19.05.005 Section amendments. 19.05.010 Work exempt from permit. 19.05.015 Fully complete application. 19.05.020 Concurrent review. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 17 - Packet Page 291 of 463 19.05.025 Manufactured home installation standards. 19.05.000 International Residential Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.020 and 19.27.074, the 2006 Edition of the International Residential Code (IRC) as published by the International Code Council (ICC), including the state amendments set forth in RCW 34.05 and Chapter 51-51 WAC, including the following appendices: A (Sizing and Capacities of Gas Piping), B (Sizing of Venting Systems Serving Appliances Equipped with Draft Hoods, Category 1 Appliances, and Appliances Listed For Use and Type B Vents), C (Exit Terminals of Mechanical Draft and Direct -Vent Venting Systems), and K (Sound Transmission Control) is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the residential building code of the city of Edmonds. The provisions of this code shall regulate the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, equipment, use, area, and maintenance of residential buildings and structures in the city, and provide for the issuance of permits and the collection of permit fees. 19.05.005 Section amendments. The following sections of the IRC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section R104.3 Notices and orders. The building official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with this code. The building official is also authorized to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code compliance in addition to the remedies provided for in this code. 2. Section R105.2 Work exempt from permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.05.010. 3. Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5). 4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension. Every permit issued shall expire by limitation 360 days after issuance except as provided in 19.00.005(A)(6)(b) and 19.10.010.A4(a). 5. Section R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.005(A)(7). {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 18 - Packet Page 292 of 463 6. R106.3.1 Approval of construction documents. When the building official issues a permit, the construction documents shall be approved, in writing or by a stamp which states "APPROVED PLANS'. One set of approved construction documents shall be retained by the building official. One set of approved construction documents shall be returned to the applicant and shall be made available on site to the building official or duly authorized agent of the city. 7. Section R106.3.3 Phased approval. Replaced by ECDC 19.00.005(A)(8). 8. Section R107 Temporary structures and uses. Deleted. 9. Section R108 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC. 10. Section R109.1.5.1.2 Lath or gypsum board inspection. To be made after all lathing and gypsum board, interior and exterior, is in place, but before any plastering is applied or before gypsum board joints and fasteners are taped and finished. 11. Section R112 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. B. Chapter 2, Definitions. 1. Section R202 Accessory Structure. Deleted. C. Chapter 3 Building Planning. 1. Table R301.2(1) Climatic and geographic design criteria. a. Ground Snow load = 25PSF b. Wind Speed(e)(mph) = 85 C. Seismic Design Category(g) = D2 d. Weathering(a) = moderate e. Frost Line Depth(b) = 18" f. Termite(c) = Yes g. Winter Design Temp(f) = 27 degrees h. Flood Hazards(h) NFIP date of adoption 3-26-74 Effective FIRM Maps 11-8-99 i. Ice Shield Underlayment required(i) = No {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 19 - Packet Page 293 of 463 j. Air Freezing Index(j) = 0-1000 k. Mean Annual Temp(k) = 50 degrees Refer to Table R301.2(1) for applicable footnotes. 2. Section R325 Automatic fire sprinkler system. An automatic fire sprinkler system is required for buildings containing five (5) or more attached dwelling units. Refer to ECDC 19.25.040. 19.05.010 Work exempt from permit. IRC Section R105.2 is replaced with the following: Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant's responsibility to comply with bulk zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC or Chapter ECDC Title 23. In addition to the permit exemptions of ECDC 19.00.010, the following single family dwelling exemptions shall apply: A. One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured to the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 120 square feet, with a maximum eave of thirty (30) inches and maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. B. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not project more than fifty-four (54) inches from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. C. Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet. D. Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. E. Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. F. Replacement or repair of existing window or doors with no change in size or framing. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 20 - Packet Page 294 of 463 G. Replacement or repair of individual decking, joists, stair treads, or intermediate rails. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply- H. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC. I. Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, not more than thirty (30) inches above grade and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route. 19.05.015 Fully complete application. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant's rights shall vest when a fully complete building permit application is filed pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015. 19.05.020 Concurrent review. An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing pursuant to ECDC 19.00.020. 19.05.025 Manufactured home installation standards. A. Permit Regulations. 1. Chapter 296-150M WAC, as currently promulgated together with any future amendments thereof, or future additions thereto, is hereby adopted by reference and incorporated into the ECDC as if set forth herein in full. The building official is authorized to issue building permits and collect permit fees for the installation of all manufactured homes that meet the requirements of this chapter, to inspect the installation of manufactured homes, and enforce all violations of this chapter. 2. All references to "installation permits" in Chapter 296- 150M WAC, as herein adopted by reference, shall refer to building permits issued for the installation of manufactured homes. 3. Fees for the installation of a manufactured home shall be set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. All other applicable development fees shall also be imposed as with any other single- family residence. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 21 - Packet Page 295 of 463 4. Mobile homes are permitted only within designated mobile home parks. 5. Pursuant to added RCW 35.21.2, 35A.21.3, 36.01.4, and amended RCW 35.63.160 and 1998 c 239 s 1., homes built to 42 USC Section 5401 through 5403 standards (as amended in 2000) shall be regulated for the purposes of siting, in the same manner as site built homes, factory built homes, or homes built to any other approved state construction. 6. Manufactured homes to be placed within the city shall not be older than three calendar years from the date of complete permit application submittal. The applicant is required to provide the vehicle identification number (VIN) information. 7. All spaces measured from the underside of the home to finished grade shall be enclosed with a decorative skirting. 8. Manufactured homes shall be thermally equivalent to the current state energy code. 9. The minimum manufactured home size shall be at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long. 10. Coated metal, tin, or vinyl roofing material is not permitted. 11. Manufactured homes shall comply with all other development standards of this code. Chapter 19.10 BUILDING PERMITS - EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Sections: 19.10.000 19.10.010 19.10.020 19.10.030 19.10.040 19.10.050 19.10.060 19.10.070 Statement of purpose and application. Section amendments. Definitions. Minimum required application submissions. Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers. Site bonds, contractor general public liability insurance. Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available science. Issuance and denial of permits. { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 296 of 463 -22- 19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and final geotechnical report. 19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application. A. This chapter has been enacted in order to provide both substantive and procedural provisions relating to the issuance of permits within designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas of the city. It shall be the policy of the city that no permit shall be issued for any site which is found to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography for the particular permit requested for issuance. When development occurs on an unstable site, an unreasonable risk of danger may exist to the public, to public improvements or to adjacent property owners. If such a site can be stabilized through the construction of on -site improvements, that risk may be reduced. B. The construction of professionally designed structures addressing the risks of earth movement, and employing feasible attendant measures (including but not limited to: drainage improvements, specially designed foundations, retaining walls, removal of overburden and other improvements designed to minimize the risk of earth movement, prevent avoidable damage to structures, safeguard adjacent properties, limit risk to inhabitants, and to stabilize the structure in the event of movement) may mitigate and reduce the risk of earth movement on individual properties. Nothing herein shall relieve an owner of any obligation imposed by the State Building Code or City ordinance to take all reasonable and practical measures available to reduce or eliminate the risk or hazard. C. The IRC/IBC, as promulgated by the state of Washington and required to be adopted by the city, does not specify a standard regarding lot stability. Since the city's request for an interpretation of the uniform building code by the state building code council to designate an acceptable level of lot stability was denied, and because the city wishes to comply with state law requiring that the issuance of building permits be a ministerial and not a discretionary act, the provisions of this chapter have been adopted in order to provide reasonable certainty in the permit issuance process. The purpose of these provisions is not to lessen the minimum requirements of the current adopted building code, but rather to define its requirements for city implementation. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 23 - Packet Page 297 of 463 D. These provisions have been adopted in order to establish a policy that permits shall not be issued for any site where a substantial risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard exist unless: l . The risks can be defined with reasonable scientific certainty and found to be within acceptable limits as determined in accordance with this chapter. 2. Any hazard associated with the site is scientifically ascertained and fully disclosed through the permit process. 3. Notice of any risk is given to future purchasers through the land records of Snohomish County. 4. Any risks associated with construction and habitation are assumed by the builder and future owners of the site. 5. Adequate indemnification is provided by the builder, and the owner of, the site in order that the general public not assume or bear any portion of the costs or liability associated with the builder's investigation, design and construction as well as the continuing maintenance of the site by the property owner. E. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this ordinance or the IRC/IBC, all applications for permits received for any site, any portion of which lies within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter. In addition to all other requirements of these sections, the restrictions and provisions of this chapter shall apply to all building, grading, fill and excavation permits (herein "permits"). Minor permits such as plumbing, mechanical, re -roof and interior alterations are exempt from the requirements of this chapter. F. All applications for 19.10 ECDC permits shall disclose within the geotechnical report whether or not any part of the site lies within, or adjacent to an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area or within a critical area as defined by the city's environmentally critical areas title. The building official may require preliminary investigation by a geotechnical engineer for any applicant whose property lies within or lies adjacent to a known earth subsidence landslide hazard area, or within a known hazard area, or areas with steep slopes or unusual topography or which has a history of earth movement in order to assist the building official in determining whether these provisions should be applied. {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 24 - Packet Page 298 of 463 G. Nothing in this chapter should or shall be interpreted to guarantee issuance of a permit with respect to any property unless the requirements of the IRC/IBC as amended and interpreted by this chapter have been met. 19.10.010 Section amendments. The provisions of this section amend the 2003 edition of the IRC/IBC and all subsequent revisions adopted by RCW 19.27.031 as the state building code as previously amended by Chapter 19.05 ECDC. All prior substantive amendments have received the approval of the state building code council. All provisions of the IRC/IBC which conflict with this chapter shall be deemed amended hereby, and any ambiguity created, shall be resolved in favor of the specific provision or general intent of said chapter. In addition to the amendments of the IRC/IBC by its alteration, improvement and correction to incorporate the chapter, the following specific code provisions are amended and the substantive and procedural requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC are amended by the correction and alteration of the following sections of the IRC/IBC: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section R105.1.1 Permit Review Applicability. Any permit requested for a site lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as defined by ECDC 19.10.020(F) shall be processed and acted upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. 2. Section R105.2 Work exempt from a permit. ECDC 19.00.010 exemptions A, B, D, E, F, G, J, K, M, and P and ECDC 19.05.010 exemptions, A, C, and D shall not apply in any area designated as an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(F). 3. Section R105.3.2 Time limitation of permit application. a. Applications, for which no permit is issued within two (2) year following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. b. The building official may not extend the time for action by the applicant on an expired application. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on current adopted codes and {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 25 - Packet Page 299 of 463 pay new plan review fees as well as any outstanding peer review fees incurred to date. 4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension. a. Every permit issued under the provisions and development standards of Chapter 19.10 ECDC shall expire by limitation two (2) years after issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)(b). b. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an extension for a third and final year. If the plans and specifications for the permit extension application are the same as the plans and specifications submitted for the original permit application and provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one half the original building permit fee to extend the permit. C. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit shall be required, with full fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The issuance of a new permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or building codes. Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, the time limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision. d. The building official shall reject requests for permit extensions if modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and building codes have occurred since the original issuance of the permit, and modifications or amendments would significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of a new permit. 5. Section R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit. a. In order to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit application with full fees shall be submitted to the building official. b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and building codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is sought to recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 26 - Packet Page 300 of 463 the codes in effect at the time of complete application for the new permit, not the expired permit. When additional plan review is required, plan review fees shall be charged. When applicable peer review and peer review fees shall be assessed. 6. Section R106.3.3.1 Phased approval. a. The building official may require sequencing of construction phases or activities such as the installation of shoring or temporary erosion control remedies and/or drainage systems, well in advance of grading or foundation construction on a time frame consistent with geotechnical recommendations and peer review. As part of the sequencing process, the building official may impose permit conditions that address site work sequencing to include but not limited to: limiting all excavation, drainage systems and foundation installation to the dryer season between May lst and September 30tn. b. When permit conditions such as groundwork are limited by the building official on a particular project, the applicants' geotechnical engineer may submit a letter detailing geotechnical recommendations that portions of work may progress. The letter shall include a detailed work schedule submitted by the general contractor specifying work to be done, timeline, provisions for monitoring and equipment to be used. Any such recommendation shall be based upon best available science and be consistent with standard geotechnical engineering practice. The building official may require a peer review prior to a decision which provides concurrence regarding at least the following issues: i. duration of work, ii. type of equipment to use, iii. additional temporary erosion and sediment control provisions required, and iv. applicability of special inspections, and similar issues. C. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure have been approved provided peer review approval has been granted. Phased approval means separate permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer, and city public works director, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 27 - Packet Page 301 of 463 approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements (including, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage) have been signed as approved by the city engineer. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the improvements. B. Chapter 2 Definitions. 1. Section R 202 and IBC 202, are hereby amended to include the definitions set forth in ECDC 19.10.020, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. C. Chapter 4 Foundations. 1. Section R 401.1 General Exception 3. Any permit requested for a site lying in whole or in part within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be processed and acted upon in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. D. IBC Chapter 16 Structural design. 1. Section IBC 1601.1.1 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. E. IBC Appendix J Grading. 1. Section IBC Appendix J 101.1.2 Scope. Setting forth the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 19.10.020 Definitions. The following terms, when used within this chapter, shall have the following definitions: A. "Architect" shall mean a person licensed to practice architecture by the state of Washington. B. "Best available science" shall be determined in accordance with the criteria established in WAC 365-195-900, et seq. C. `Bluff' shall mean any slope ten (10) feet in height or greater inclined at greater than 1 unit vertical in 1 unit horizontal or 100% slope. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 28 - Packet Page 302 of 463 D. "Building Official" shall mean the building official of the city of Edmonds. E. "Director" shall mean the director of development services as well as any authorized representative of the director. F. "Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area" shall mean any area of the city which, by reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topography has a risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances. The earth subsidence and landslide hazard area is a subcategory of landslide hazard area (a geologically hazardous area) as defined in city of Edmonds environmentally critical areas title. The hazard area designated as the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area in the 2007 report of Landau Associates and as may be amended in future adopted earth subsidence and landslide hazard maps are hereby incorporated by this reference and made a part of this chapter as fully as if herein set forth and may be provided in a summary text form. Future adopted landslide hazard maps shall be incorporated by reference upon adoption by ordinance. Areas designated on the adopted North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas Map, or any future adopted landslide hazard map as having a risk of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, areas with slopes as designated in ECDC 23.80.020, areas which exhibit geologic characteristics of earth movement, or any other area identified as having a history of earth movement shall be presumed to have such risk and shall be considered to be an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. Applicants for permits in such areas shall submit a geotechnical report and complete plan set submittal as required by this chapter to the building official for review. The presumption of risk shall be rebuttable and the decision of the director or building official that any area lies within, or adjacent to, such earth subsidence and landslide hazard area shall be appealable as a staff decision to superior court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act. Copies of the reports and maps shall be maintained in the offices of the building official and shall be available for inspection during all normal working hours. Individual copies of the reports and map may be obtained by the public upon the payment of the cost of reproduction. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 29 - Packet Page 303 of 463 G. "General Contractor" shall mean a bonded, insured and registered contractor in the state of Washington. A general contractor shall maintain state required bonding and shall carry general public liability insurance in the minimum amount of one million dollars. The general contractor shall have a current valid state contractor's license with the state of Washington and a city of Edmonds resident or non-resident business license, whichever is applicable. H. "Geologist" means a practicing geologist licensed in the state of Washington with at least four (4) years experience as a licensed geologist in responsible charge, including experience with landslide evaluation. I. "Geotechnical Engineer" means a practicing, geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least four (4) years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge, including experience with landslide evaluation. I "Landslide Hazard Area" means areas mapped or otherwise defined by the city of Edmonds as environmental critical areas or geologically hazardous areas. K. "Land Surveyor" means a person who holds a Washington State land surveyor's license. L. "Lead Design Professional" means the person designated by the applicant to oversee and coordinate the permit review process on behalf of the applicant. M. "Plan Set Submittal" means a complete application pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015 including: 1. Vicinity Map. 2. Topography map and survey. 3. Civil plans including; grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drainage, utilities and site improvements. 4. Tree cutting/land clearing plans. 5. Geotechnical report. 6. Architectural and structural plans with design calculations, stamped and signed by licensed design professionals of the state of Washington. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 30 - Packet Page 304 of 463 N. "Site" means the entire area within the boundaries, as described in a legal description, of the property that is to be developed under the permit for which the applicant has applied. O. "Stable" shall mean that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the reports developed under the requirements of ECDC 19.10.030 and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. In the event that any site has an underlying risk of movement based upon deep-seated earth movement or large-scale earth failure which is not susceptible of correction by on -site improvements, such hazard shall not render a site proposed for single-family residences to be presumed unstable for the purpose of this provision if the geotechnical engineer of record and recommendation of any peer reviewer confirm the risk of probability of earth movement is thirty (30) percent or less within a twenty-five (25) year period. In order to meet the definition of stable the geotechnical report shall include identified hazards for the property and the mitigation measures proposed to reduce or correct the hazards along with measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards, including, all on and off site measures taken to correct or reduce the risk. These shall be fully disclosed to the applicant and future owners, heirs and assigns in the covenant required to be executed in accordance with provisions of this chapter, in which case the defined risk may be approved as an acceptable condition. P. "Steep Slope" shall be defined and calculated pursuant to Chapter 23.80 ECDC. Q. "Storm Event" means one (1) inch or greater precipitation in a twenty-four (24) hour period as reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). R. "Structural Engineer" means a person licensed to practice structural engineering by the state of Washington. S. "Structural Fill" shall mean any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils are intended to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill should be clean and free draining and should be placed above unyielding native site soils compacted in accordance with an approved geotechnical report prepared utilizing best engineering science. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 31 - Packet Page 305 of 463 19.10.030 Minimum required application submittals. A. The applicant shall submit a complete plan set submittal and permit application and specifications for the proposed development as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(M) and this chapter. B. An Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard area permit submittal checklist shall be adopted at the direction of the director and shall be provided to all persons inquiring regarding building permit applications or development permits in the designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard area of North Edmonds. The submittal checklist shall include but not be limited to the requirements contained in city public handouts, written policies, adopted maps, reference maps, summary reports, minimum geotechnical report guidelines, and the following: - North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map. Vicinity map. Topographic map and survey. Civil plans (i.e., grading, temporary erosion and sediment control, storm drainage, utilities and site improvements). - Tree cutting/land clearing plan. - Geotechnical report. - Owner and professional declarations. - Detailed architectural and structural plans with structural calculations and specifications. - Bonds, covenants and contractor public liability insurance in accordance with the detailed requirements stated below. If any item in the checklist is inapplicable to a particular project, a letter or a report shall be provided to the director stamped by the appropriate licensed design professional, with sufficient information or data to demonstrate why the item is inapplicable. The director may utilize appropriate licensed consultants to determine if generally accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application requirement. When consultants are used to determine if generally accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application requirement the cost of review shall be paid by the applicant. C. A copy of the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map shall be included in the submittal checklist materials. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 32 - Packet Page 306 of 463 D. The vicinity map shall be suitable for locating the site and include information related to existing conditions on or near the site, based on the topographic map and survey and shall designate all known landslide masses, or debris flows or mud flows on or near the site which could threaten proposed structures within 100 feet, as referenced, noted, described or discussed in the geotechnical report. E. The applicant shall submit a topographic map and survey prepared and stamped by a licensed land surveyor, prior to studies and evaluations by the geotechnical engineer, and shall show: 1. Map scale, north arrow, legal description, tax account parcel numbers, easements, lot property lines. 2. Existing grade contour lines, at two (2) foot intervals. 3. All distances between existing structures on the site and approximate distances of existing habitable structures on adjacent sites within 50 feet of property lines (all adjacent sites which could affect or be affected by the proposed development shall be shown). 4. Lowest footing or basement slab elevation of existing and proposed structures on the property and on adjacent properties to the extent that such information is reasonably available and, proposed finish floor elevations. 5. The location of existing sanitary sewers, storm water drainage facilities, septic tanks, drain fields, wells, piezometers, private drainage systems, underground storage tanks, subsurface drains, and other sewer/drainage facility components on, and adjacent to, the site to the extent such information is reasonably available. 6. The location of all existing underground utilities on, and adjacent to, the site including, but not limited to; telephone, cable television, gas, electric and water utilities, vaults, fire hydrants and other cables, wires, meters and drainage pipes to the extent that such information is available. 7. A separate topographical drawing shall be submitted showing proposed grade contours at two (2) foot intervals. This drawing shall include bottom of proposed footing elevations including all stepped footing elevations. F. Civil engineered plans shall be prepared and stamped by a state of Washington licensed civil engineer pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 ECDC and current adopted City {wss664610.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 33 - Packet Page 307 of 463 Stormwater Manual. Geotechnical report recommendations affecting civil plans shall be incorporated into the design and detailed on the plans and shall include: 1. Storm drainage plan with storm drainage calculations. 2. Provisions for building pad and foundation drainage. 3. Temporary erosion and sediment control with drainage and maintenance provisions, and/or other sediment control assemblies. 4. Permanent erosion control with drainage and maintenance provisions. 5. Fill/soil stockpile limitation provisions, specific location, height, protection and maintenance. 6. Slope protection plans, rockeries, retaining walls, ecology blocks, keystone block walls, soldier pile walls, and soil nail walls. 7. Utilities and site improvements. 8. Grading plans, temporary and permanent shoring plans, top and toe of slope setbacks, driveway slope. G. In lieu of the procedural requirements of Chapter 18.45 ECDC a tree cutting/land clearing plan shall be submitted when significant trees are proposed to be removed. A significant tree is a tree with a trunk diameter of six inches or greater measured 4 feet from the ground. No significant tree shall be removed until the permit is approved. A detailed landscape plan may also be required in order for the city to evaluate long-term erosion control measures. The plan shall comply with all requirements of the ECDC relating to tree clearing and critical areas review, if applicable. The director may require the project geotechnical engineer's concurrence regarding an approval of a tree cutting/land clearing plan when slope stability is at issue. H. Included in the permit submittal checklist shall be general and specific soils and geotechnical information, details or analysis required pursuant to IBC 1802. The applicant shall retain a geotechnical engineer to prepare a report and evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions on the site to include: 1. The geotechnical report shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices, under {wss664610.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 34 - Packet Page 308 of 463 the supervision of, and signed and stamped by, the geotechnical engineer. A geologist may be required to be part of the geotechnical consulting staff. The report shall reference the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007) as a technical document reviewed as part of the geologic analysis for the project and discuss all items listed in the permit submittal checklist and shall make specific recommendations concerning development of the site. 2. The opinions and recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be supported by field observations and, where appropriate or applicable, by literature review, conducted by the geotechnical engineer. The report shall be based on best available science. 3. The report shall include an analysis of material gathered through appropriate explorations, such as borings or test pits to a minimum depth of 6 feet below the proposed lowest footing or pile, an analysis of soil characteristics conducted by or under the supervision of, the engineer in accordance with the standards adopted by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other applicable standards. The report must provide subsurface data to support the engineer's conclusions regarding slope stability. 4. If the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be reviewed and approved by a geologist. It shall be the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer to assure that the geologist meets the qualifications listed in the definition section. A letter of concurrence from the geologist shall be included in the report. 5. Based upon the North Edmonds Landslide Area Geology and Slide Mechanisms map and table found in the Landau Associates Summary Report (2007), any lot which contains any portion of any hazard zone or is adjacent thereto, (regardless of whether the proposed building pad is located within any hazard area) shall specifically consider within the geotechnical report, the following types of typical hazard zones and shall specifically note if the hazard is, or is not, present on the site. The report shall address hazards from encroaching landslide materials, hazards from ground failure in material that has not previously failed, and hazards from ground failure in previously failed material. For each landslide hazard identified on a property, the geotechnical engineer shall identify the types of specific processes associated with the hazard and include design features to reduce such hazards and mitigate impacts. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 35 - Packet Page 309 of 463 6. For properties containing or adjacent to bluffs, the geotechnical engineer shall, as a part of the building permit process provide analysis of the rate of retreat of the bluff prepared by a geologist and estimate the bluff retreat amount and regression rate for periods of twenty-five (25) and 125 years. The geotechnical engineer shall address the effects of bluff retreat on the stability of structures and/or improvements. A structure is defined as: a. A building intended for human habitation, b. A building, structure or other improvement, whose stress or weight, collapse or movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure and, C. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public safety or provide stability. If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate of retreat of the bluff is such that any structure or improvement constructed pursuant to the building permit would be unreasonably endangered or reasonably could be anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal useful life, the application shall be denied. Geotechnical letter addressing the provisions of Chapter 23.80 ECDC. I. The applicant shall submit, consistent with the findings of the geotechnical report, detailed structural plans with corresponding calculations prepared and stamped by the structural engineer of record. When architectural plans incorporate such structural details said plans shall be stamped and signed by the structural engineer of record. All other architectural plans may be prepared by an architect, designer, builder or lay person. J. The applicant shall submit documentation of required bonds, frozen funds or adequate instrument of credit. The applicants shall submit a copy of the contractor's general public liability insurance pursuant to ECDC 19.10.050. K. The applicant shall submit declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers as required by ECDC 19.10.040. 19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers. A. Notices of permit submittal application with the city shall be posted pursuant to ECDC 20.91.0I013(b). Such notices shall be IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 36 - Packet Page 310 of 463 conspicuously posted and maintained at each street frontage at the applicant's expense and direction. Notice of permit issuance or denial shall be conspicuously posted as required above. Upon each posting a ten (10) day appeal period shall commence. Appeals shall be heard at Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, and no other appeal shall be permitted. B. At permit application submittal, the applicant shall submit a written declaration with the permit application that includes the statement that the accuracy of all information is warranted by the owner/applicant in a form which relieves the city and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such submittals. The declaration shall also state that the owner/applicant understands and accepts the risk of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that the owner/applicant will advise in writing any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective purchasers or residential lessees of structures or portions of a structure on the site of the slide potential of the area. The owner applicant shall also acknowledge that he, she or they understand and accept the need for future monitoring and maintenance of the property as described in the final geotechnical report when future monitoring and maintenance may affect slope stability over time. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the city, all conclusions shall be those of the owner/applicant and his or her professionals. C. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter from the geotechnical engineer and civil engineer who prepared the geotechnical report and civil plans, stating that in his or her judgment the plans and specifications submitted for the project conform to the recommendations in the geotechnical report, and that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimized subject to the conditions set forth in the report; and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. Minimized shall mean that the applicant has utilized best available science and commonly accepted engineering and architectural practice to minimize, to the extent possible, the risks associated with development of the property. The geotechnical engineer shall review the erosion and sediment control plan and provide a statement about the adequacy of the plan with respect to site conditions and report findings. The IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 37 - Packet Page 311 of 463 geotechnical engineer's statement shall also include an identification of landslide hazards applicable to the site, the on -site measures taken to correct or reduce the hazards, as applicable, and measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards. For sites where the hazards are not mitigated or where the risks from deep-seated or large-scale earth movement cannot be practically reduced by individual lot owners, the geotechnical engineer shall prepare a statement identifying what design measures will be taken to mitigate the risk to structures, adjacent properties, and inhabitants in the event of deep-seated or large- scale movement. The statement shall specify any risks from earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures and render an opinion as to whether the site will be stable within the meaning of the ordinance following installation of all proposed improvements. The statement will clarify to current and future owners what measures were installed to reduce risks and what hazards could not be addressed by individual lot development. D. Further recommendations signed and sealed by the geotechnical engineer shall be provided should there be additions or exceptions to the original recommendations based on the plans, site conditions or other supporting data. If the geotechnical engineer who reviews the plans and specifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report, the new engineer shall, in a letter to the director accompanying the plans and specifications, express agreement or disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and state that the revised plans and specifications conform to the new recommendations. E. The plan set submittal shall include a disclosure letter or notation on the design drawings by the structural engineer of record stating that; he has reviewed the geotechnical report(s), that he understands its recommendations, has explained or has had explained to the owner/applicant, the risk of loss due to slides on the site, and that he has incorporated into the design the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any risk of earth movement referenced in the report. The statement shall note any risks, hazards, potential problems from earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures. F. The owner shall execute a covenant, (in a form provided by the city) to be submitted with the application (with necessary fee) to be filed with the Snohomish County Auditor. The director shall IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 38 - Packet Page 312 of 463 cause such completed covenant to be so filed. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be forwarded to the owner. This covenant shall be a covenant running with the land, which shall at a minimum include: A legal description of the property. 2. A statement explaining that the site is in a potential earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, that the risk associated with the development of the site is set forth in permit file No. with the city of Edmonds building department, that conditions or prohibitions on development may have been imposed by the city in the course of permit issuance, and referencing any features in the design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soil changes. The covenant may incorporate by reference the statements and conditions to be observed in the form proposed by the owner/applicant's geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer as approved after the review set forth in ECDC 19.10.060. 3 A statement waiving and promising to indemnify and hold harmless the city of Edmonds, its officers and employees from any claims the owner/applicant and his/her successors or assigns may have for any loss or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting from soil movement and arising from or out of the issuances of any permit(s) authorizing development on the site, as well as due to any act or failure to act by the indemnitor , its agents or successors, in interest under or following issuance of the permit. 4. The date of permit issuance and permit number authorizing the development. 19.10.050 Site bonds and contractor general public liability insurance. A. Site bonding requirements. 1. A surety bond, in an amount to be determined by the director, executed by a surety company authorized to do business in the state of Washington shall be posted by the owner/applicant or general contractor to assure the restoration of any areas on the site, or in the surrounding area, disturbed or damaged by slides during construction, and to ensure completion of the work authorized by the permit, or, if the work is not completed, to assure that the site will be restored to a safe and stable condition at least equal to the safety and stability of the site prior to commencement IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 39 - Packet Page 313 of 463 of work under the permit. The bond will be exonerated upon occupancy approval of the building permit by the building official. 2. In lieu of the surety bond, the owner/applicant or general contractor may propose to file a cash deposit or an instrument of credit with the director in an amount equal to that which would be required in the surety bond, and similarly conditioned. B. Public liability insurance. The general contractor of record shall carry general public liability insurance effective through final occupancy in the minimum amount of one million dollars, and which shall name the city as an additional named insured, against the injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city's involvement in the permitting process for the project. C. Homeowner insurance. The city strongly recommends that each property owner maintain policies of liability insurance, adequate to provide sufficient funds, to indemnify and hold harmless third parties in the event of earth subsidence or landslides emanating from or across the owner's property. 19.10.060 Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available science. A. The city shall require professional peer review of the plan set submittals accompanying the permit application by a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, geologist, and/or structural engineer as may be necessary and determined by the building official or director, in order to determine whether the plan set submittals were prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice or the practice of the particular engineering or design specialty and are based upon best available science. The full cost of such peer review shall be paid in full by the owner/applicant within thirty (30) days of billing by the city. Failure to make timely payments shall result in a stay of city plan review services on the application. B. This requirement may be selectively waived at the discretion of the director provided the applicable project geotechnical engineer, civil engineer or structural engineer provides written concurrence, determination, details, facts and/or data that individual site conditions warrant an exemption from outside peer review. Once waived, the building official shall not be required to inquire further into the adequacy of any report, plans, or data, but rather may rely upon the submittals as warranted by the owner/applicant as reviewed by the city's consultant. Nothing herein shall relieve the owner/applicant of the obligation IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 40 - Packet Page 314 of 463 to submit a complete application fulfilling all the requirements of this chapter and the IRC/IBC. C. The final recommendation of the peer review regarding whether a submittal complies with generally accepted practice and/or is based on best available science shall be binding upon the building official. Such recommendation may be appealed to Superior Court under the Land Use Petition Act. 19.10.070 Issuance and denial of permits. A. Permit Issuance. The following requirements must be satisfied before a permit will be issued: 1. An approved geotechnical report has been submitted and approved. 2. Plans and specifications have been submitted incorporating the recommendations of the geotechnical report and said plans have been approved. 3. The required declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers have been submitted and approved. 4. Required bonds, cash deposits and public liability insurance have been posted with the city. 5. When peer review has been required, all submittals have been determined to have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice. 6. Peer review concurrence for permit issuance has been received by the building official. 7. All other provisions of ECDC Titles 16, 18 & 20 have been reviewed and approved by the appropriate city official. B. Permit denial. The following criteria shall result in the denial of issuance of permit: 1. Building, grading and excavation permits for construction on land which the director finds to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography, or 2. The resulting development would increase the potential of soil movement resulting in an unacceptable risk of damage to IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 41 - Packet Page 315 of 463 adjacent properties or an unreasonable risk of damage to the proposed development, or 3. Excessive flooding, seepage, high water table, or inadequate drainage, or 4. If the bluff retreat rate analysis shows that the rate retreat of the bluff is such that any structure or improvement would be unreasonably endangered or reasonably could be anticipated to be endangered by landslide or earth subsidence during its normal useful life, the application shall be denied. A structure is defined as: a. A building intended for human habitation, b. A building, structure or other improvement, whose stress or weight, collapse or movement would endanger public safety in the event of slope failure and, C. Any improvement on the site which is necessary to mitigate danger to public safety or provide stability, or 5. Other hazardous conditions posing an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or welfare, or 6. Where the noted site dangers or geologic hazards are not minimized to the extent possible by the use of best available science and generally accepted engineering and architectural practice, or 7. If the applicant's geotechnical engineer determines that there is a greater chance than thirty (30) percent in a 25 year period that landslide damage on site will occur. C. In making a determination of permit denial, the director shall consider not only the land which is the subject of the application, but in addition, the surrounding area which would be adversely affected if the permit were granted. Permit denial shall be made in writing to the owner/applicant when the site cannot be rendered stable as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(0). This decision and other preliminary determinations as referenced herein shall be appealable to Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act. No other appeal shall be permitted. The appeal period shall commence upon the date of mailing of any preliminary or final decision, or upon posting, if posting is the only notice a party with standing receives under the terms of this chapter. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 42 - Packet Page 316 of 463 D. Prohibitions. Because of the relationship of groundwater to stability, the discharge of collected surface water or storm water to the ground surface or subsurface is prohibited on sites within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. In addition, the following construction, buildings, or improvements are hereby prohibited within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area: 1. Swimming pools or hot tubs. 2. Ponds or other artificial impoundments of water. 3. Watering or irrigation systems. 4. Temporary or permanent stockpile of fill on top or bottom of slopes. 5. Rockeries. E. Waiver. The prohibitions established in paragraph D above shall apply unless the property owner requests a waiver based upon the written analysis of a geotechnical engineer which clearly establishes that the proposed improvement will have no reasonable likelihood of triggering or otherwise contributing to any landslide hazard or earth subsidence risk either on the site or in the neighboring earth subsidence or landslide hazard area. In any review or appeal of the director's or building official's denial of a waiver to construct an otherwise prohibited improvement, the burden of proof shall always be upon the applicant to establish by a clear preponderance of the evidence, that no such risk will be created by the improvement. Any geotechnical engineering report provided in any review shall consider not only the risk incurred due to or during construction of the otherwise prohibited improvement, but also the potential impacts due to failure to maintain the improvement, damage through reasonably foreseeable events such as earthquakes or other acts of God, or the reasonably foreseeable negligence of the owner or future owners. The director may utilize peer review consultants. 19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and final geotechnical report. A. Site clearing and grading. The owner/applicant or contractor shall secure the building official's approval before entering an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area site with excavating or other grading and clearing equipment to clear, {wss66461o.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 43 - Packet Page 317 of 463 remove trees or grade for any purpose including the creation of access to the site. The building official may condition such access approval if site conditions are warranted and when discretionary approval permits are required. As part of the approval process the building official may impose conditions that address site work issues; such measures could include but are not limited to limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the dryer season between May and the end of September, or sequencing activities such as the installation of drainage systems well in advance of construction. Requests for early site access in advance of building permit approval or in the time period between October lst and April 30th for any purpose shall be submitted to the building official accompanied by written concurrence of the owner/applicant's geotechnical engineer of record. The building official may utilize peer review consultants to determine whether the request is based on generally accepted engineering practice and is reasonable with regard to time -frame to complete the work, types of equipment proposed to perform the work, length of exposure of slopes, and adequacy of site monitoring and temporary erosion control measures. When such peer review is utilized the applicant is responsible for the peer review fee. B. Reporting authority. The owner/applicant shall retain a geotechnical engineer to monitor the site during construction. The owner/applicant shall preferably retain the geotechnical engineer who prepared the final geotechnical report in the plan set submittal and who has reviewed the approved plans and specifications. If a different geotechnical engineering consultant is retained by the owner/applicant, the new geotechnical engineer shall submit a letter to the director stating that he or she has read all reports and recommendations and reviews to date and state whether or not he or she agrees with the opinions and recommendations of the original geotechnical report and peer review comments. Further recommendations, signed and sealed by the new geotechnical engineer, and supporting data, shall be provided should there be exceptions or changes to the original recommendations that would effect the approved plans. C. Construction monitoring, special inspections. {wss66461o.Doc;1/00006.900000/) - 44 - Packet Page 318 of 463 1. Inspection requirements. During the period from October 1st to April 30th, when on site, the owner/applicant or designated erosion sedimentation control (ESC) site supervisor shall perform erosion and sedimentation control inspections. Records of installed ESC facilities shall be maintained by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor and copies of all ESC records shall be provided to City inspectors upon request. ESC facilities on inactive sites (sites where no work will be performed for more than three (3) consecutive days) shall be inspected weekly by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor. During all other times of the year, weekly inspections by the ESC site supervisor are required and shall be recorded. 2. Weekly field reports. The geotechnical engineer shall monitor, during construction, compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including; site excavation, shoring, temporary erosion control, soil support for foundation, piles, sub drainage installation, soil compaction and other geotechnical aspects of the construction. Unless otherwise approved by the director, the specific recommendations contained in the geotechnical report shall be implemented by the owner/applicant. Omissions or deviations from the approved geotechnical report and civil plans shall be highlighted to the city in a separate report. All reports shall be submitted to the city on a weekly basis for review. Failure to submit required reports may result in the issuance of a stop work order. 3. Storm events. During all work periods, special inspections shall be performed after storm events as defined in ECDC 19.10.020(Q). The storm event report shall be provided within one week of the event. Final construction report. The geotechnical engineer of record shall prepare a final written report to be submitted to the building official, stating that based upon his or her professional opinion, site observations and final site grading that the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements as shown on the approved plans. Substantially complies means that the completed development offers at least the level of stability and safety, on and off site, as was afforded by the original recommendations and report. Recommendations to the owner/applicant shall be included in the report for future monitoring and maintenance of the property including drainage, tightlines, catch basins, berms, retaining wall IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 45 - Packet Page 319 of 463 drainage, hazard mitigation improvements, slopes, bluffs, vegetation, and permanent erosion control that effect slope stability over time. Occupancy of the residence shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the building official. Chapter 19.15 MECHANICAL CODE AND FUEL GAS CODE Sections: 19.15.000 International Mechanical Code and International Fuel Gas Code adopted. 19.15.005 Section amendments. 19.15.010 Work exempt from permit. 19.15.000 International Mechanical Code and International Fuel Gas Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.190 and 19.27.020, the 2006 Edition of the International Mechanical Code (IMC) as well as the 2006 Edition of the International Fuel and Gas Code (IFGC) including the following appendices: A (Sizing and Capacities of Gas Piping), B (Sizing of Venting Systems Serving Appliances Equipped with Draft Hoods, Category 1 Appliances, and Appliances Listed For Use and Type B Vents), C (Exit Terminals of Mechanical Draft and Direct -Vent Venting Systems), except for Section 109, Appeals, which is replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC, published by the International Code Council together with the state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-52 WAC, are adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the mechanical code and fuel gas code of the city of Edmonds. 19.15.005 Section amendments. A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section 106.2 Work exempt from permit. Replaced by ECDC 19.15.010. 2. Section 106.4.3 Expiration. a. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced and granted final approval within 180 days from the IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 46 - Packet Page 320 of 463 date of such permit. Once expired, a new permit with full fees shall be obtained before work is recommenced. b. Mechanical permits issued in conjunction with a main building permit may be extended to expire with the main building permit and may be extended with provisions afforded to the main building permit. 3. Section 106.4.4 Extensions. Deleted. 4. Section 106.5 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC. 5. Section 109 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 19.15.010 Work exempt from permit. IMC Section 106.2 is amended as follows: Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. A building permit shall not be required for the following subject to stated limitations in areas of the city subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC: A. Gas: 1. Portable heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances. 2. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. 3. Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. B. Mechanical: 1. Portable heating appliances. 2. Portable ventilation appliances. 3. Portable cooling unit. 4. Steam, hot or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by this code. 5. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 47 - Packet Page 321 of 463 6. Portable evaporative cooler. 7. Self-contained refrigeration systems containing ten (10) pounds or less of refrigerant or that are actuated by motors of one (1) horsepower or less. 8. Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. Chapter 19.20 PLUMBING CODE Sections: 19.20.000 Uniform Plumbing Code adopted. 19.20.005 Section amendments. 19.20.010 Evidence of potable water. 19.20.000 Uniform Plumbing Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.190 and 19.27.020, the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2006 Edition, including Appendix G (Graywater Systems for Single -Family Dwellings), published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, together with the state amendments set forth in WAC Chapter 51-56 and 51-57 are adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the plumbing code for the city of Edmonds, with the exception of fuel -gas piping being superseded by the International Fuel Gas Code as described in Chapter 19.15 ECDC, and the amendments contained herein. The 2006 Edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards is also adopted by reference as if fully set forth, pursuant to Chapter 51-57 WAC. 19.20.005 Section amendments. A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section 102.4 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 2. Section 103.3.4 Expiration. a. Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced and granted final approval within 180 days from the date of such permit. Once expired, a new permit with full fees shall be obtained before work is recommenced. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 48 - Packet Page 322 of 463 b. Plumbing permits issued in conjunction with a main building permit may be extended to expire with the main building permit and may be extended with provisions afforded to the main building permit. 3. Section 103.4 Fees. Replaced by Chapter 19.70 ECDC. 4. Section 103.6.4 Septic or sewer system connection. a. No occupancy permit shall be issued for the occupancy of any building or structure until connection to the city public sewer system has been verified or an approved sewage septic system has been installed and approved. B. Chapter 7 Sanitary Drainage. 1. Part II Building sewers. Deleted. a. Section 713.0 Sewer required. Deleted. Building sewers located more than two feet from the exterior wall of the building to the property line are regulated by the city public works director. 2. Section 714.0 Damage to public sewer or private sewage disposal system. Deleted. 3. Section 715.0 Building sewer materials. Deleted. 4. Section 716.0 Markings. Deleted. 5. Section 717.0 Size of building sewers. Deleted. 6. Section 718.0 Grade, support and protection of building sewers. Deleted. 7. Section 719.0 Cleanouts. Deleted. 8. Section 720.0 Sewer and water pipes. Deleted. 9. Section 721.0 Location. Deleted. 10. Section 722.0 Abandoned sewers and sewage disposal facilities. Deleted. 11. Section 723.0 Building sewer test. Deleted. 12. Table 7-7 Minimum horizontal distance required from building sewer. Deleted. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 49 - Packet Page 323 of 463 13. Table 7-8 Maximum/minimum fixture unit loading on building sewer piping. Deleted. C. Chapter 10 Traps and Interceptors. 1. UPC 1014.0, Grease traps and interceptors. Deleted. Grease traps and all interceptors are regulated by ECC Chapter 7.90. 2. UPC 1015.0 Food waste disposal and dishwasher prohibited. Deleted. 3. UPC 1016.0 Sand interceptors. Deleted. 4. UPC 1017.0 Oil and flammable liquids interceptors. Deleted. D. Chapter 11 Storm drainage. Replaced by Chapter 18.30 ECDC. E. Chapter 12, Fuel piping. Replaced by Chapter 19.15 ECDC. F. Chapter 15 Firestop protection. Deleted. 19.20.010 Evidence of potable water. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for new development, the building official shall require substantive evidence of an adequate potable water supply from the purveyor of water to the site for which a building permit is requested. For those areas lying within the service area of the city of Edmonds water utility, the notification from a duly authorized representative of the city's water utility shall be sufficient; provided, nothing herein shall be interpreted to prevent the city or any of its water purveyors from declaring a moratorium or other water emergency limiting or otherwise restricting the availability of adequate potable water. Applicants relying on a well shall provide a copy of applicable state approval for the appropriation and a current test of water quality by a qualified laboratory. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 50 - Packet Page 324 of 463 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE Sections: 19.25.000 Adoption of life safety and maintenance codes. 19.25.005 Section amendments. 19.25.010 Department of fire prevention. 19.25.015 Definitions. 19.25.020 Permits. 19.25.025 Charges for water mains and hydrants. 19.25.030 Charges for fire review and inspection. 19.25.035 Fire extinguishers and systems service. 19.25.040 Automatic sprinkler systems. 19.25.045 Modifications, interpretations, and appeals. 19.25.050 Fire protection water supplies. 19.25.055 Location of public hydrants. 19.25.060 Location of private hydrants. 19.25.065 Mains and service lines. 19.25.070 Hydrant specifications. 19.25.075 Penalties. 19.25.000 Adoption of life safety and maintenance codes. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the 2006 Edition of the International Fire Code (IFC) as published by the International Code Council including the state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-54 WAC, including reference standards of the National Fire Protection Association and the following Appendices: B (Fire -Flow Requirements for Buildings), C (Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution), E (Hazard Categories) and F (Hazard Ranking) are adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the fire code of the city of Edmonds. The International Existing Building Code is not adopted and all references to that code shall be disregarded. 19.25.005 Section amendments. The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and other enforcement agencies shall have authority to render necessary assistance in the investigation of fires and enforcement { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 325 of 463 -51- of the life safety provisions of this code when requested to do so by the fire code official. 2. Section 104.11.2 Obstructing operations. No person shall obstruct the operations of the fire department in connection with extinguishment control or investigation of any fire, or actions relative to other emergencies, or disobey any lawful command of the fire chief or officer of the fire department in charge of the emergency, or any part thereof, or any lawful order of a police officer assisting the fire department. 3. Section 108, Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. B. Chapter 5 Fire Service Features (Fire Apparatus Access Roads). The following sections are adopted as originally set forth in the IFC: 1. Section 503.1 Where required. 2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. 3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access. 4. Section 503.1.3 High -piled storage. 5. Section 503.2 Specifications. 6. Section 503.3 Marking. 7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads. C. Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems. 1. Section 901.6.1 Standards. Fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the referenced standards listed in Table 901.6.1 and this chapter. For the sole purpose of inspecting, testing and maintenance of water -based fire protection systems in accordance with NFPA 25, all existing water -based fire protection systems shall be considered new as of July 1, 2004. 2. Section 904.11.7 Existing commercial cooking systems. Existing fire suppression systems for commercial cooking not in compliance with Underwriters Laboratory Standard 300 shall be replaced with a conforming system by July 1, 2005. D. Chapter 33 Explosives and Fireworks. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 52 - Packet Page 326 of 463 1. Section 3301.1.3, Fireworks. Exceptions No. 3 and No. 4 replaced by Chapter 5.27 ECC. 19.25.010 Department of fire prevention. A. There is established in the city fire department a department of fire prevention, to be supervised by the fire code official. B. The IFC shall be enforced by the department of fire prevention. C. The fire code official shall be the fire marshal who shall be in charge of the department of fire prevention and who shall be appointed by the mayor on the basis of applicable civil service rules and regulations for the city. D. The fire marshal may recommend to the fire chief the employment of technical officers, inspectors and other employees. If approved, technical officers and inspectors shall be hired or assigned for that purpose. E. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor. It shall contain all proceedings under this code, with other statistics as the fire marshal of the city fire department may wish to include. The fire marshal may also recommend any changes to the code. 19.25.015 Definitions. A. Whenever the term "fire code official" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal. B. Whenever the term "chief administrative officer" or "fire chief," is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire chief. C. Whenever the term "legal representative of the jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city attorney. D. Whenever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds. 19.25.020 Permits. A. Whenever the IFC requires an operational permit, the application for the permit shall be accompanied by an application fee of $30.00. All permits shall be renewed annually unless a specific time period is set forth when the permit is granted. No permit shall be transferable and each permit shall be issued on a IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 53 - Packet Page 327 of 463 single job, transaction, owner, or occupancy basis, except that the fire marshal is authorized to consolidate permits for a single location, building, or unit. B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with the activity requires a fire safety inspection in excess of the time estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an inspection fee equal to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be charged pursuant to ECDC 19.25.030. C. The following activities regulated pursuant to the IFC shall not require a permit to be issued under this section. Nothing herein shall be interpreted, however, to exempt these activities from other permits or licenses required by law or ordinance. The accepted activities are: 1. Carnivals and fairs; 2. Open flames and candles; 3. Open burning (see ECC 5.22.030); 4. Fire hydrants and water control valves; 5. Private fire hydrants; 6. Roof -top heliports; 7. Waste handling. 19.25.025 Charges for water mains and hydrants. A. Water main replacement to city standards, plans and specifications will be accomplished by the city in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan and adopted capital improvement program. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the replacement (upgrade) of the existing public main (including fire hydrants and appurtenances) to city standard when identified by the city engineer as a condition of development approval. The city will pay the difference in material costs only between six inches and the size that is required to be installed only when the existing system is a looped system. B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is required in order for any person or entity other than fire department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 54 - Packet Page 328 of 463 C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances to properties not previously served shall be sized in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan, built to city standard and shall be at the benefited property owner's or developer's expense. D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands relating to a particular property or development shall be installed at the developer's or property owner's expense. E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections C and D of this section provide service or benefits to properties other than owned by the water main installer, latecomer agreements may be arranged between the city and the installer for the construction and dedication of the water facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35.91 RCW. 19.25.030 Charges for fire review and inspection. A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire department inspection. The cost of the permit may include an estimate of the normal time associated with the fire inspection. Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the estimate of time established within the ordinance is exceeded by the actual time spent inspecting a premises, location or activity, the actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The administrative services director is authorized to establish on an annual basis, in conjunction with or immediately following the budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with the provision of services by reasonable classifications of city employees. B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in addition to the permit fee associated with such activity. Licenses and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection charges include, but are not limited to, public amusements licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.32 ECC, cabaret dances licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment facilities licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.80 ECC. C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency of the city of Edmonds operating within the city's general fund. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 55 - Packet Page 329 of 463 19.25.035 Fire extinguishers and systems service. A. A service permit or a current license/certification by an approved testing authority shall be required for the testing and maintenance of fire extinguishers and fire extinguishing systems. B. Applicants for a permit to service fire extinguishers and fire extinguishing systems shall be required to take and pass an examination to be established by the fire marshal. Permit fees are set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. If the permit is not issued, because the examination is not held or the applicant fails to complete the examination, a refund of the permit fee will be made to the applicant. C. Service permits shall be issued by the fire marshal. The permit may be revoked at any time the permittee fails to comply with city, state or federal regulations. The permit is not transferable and shall be void if the permit holder changes business address or employers. D. The permit shall expire after five years. The permittee shall then obtain a new permit if he wishes to continue servicing fire extinguishers or fire extinguishing systems. E. The fire marshal may waive permit requirements for applicant when provided with proof of current license or current certification by an approved testing authority. The fire marshal may, as often as necessary, inquire with licensing authority regarding licensing and certification testing methods, requirements and dates of effectiveness, prior to approval for work performed. F. A certificate of inspection for every system test, maintenance, activation and repair shall be forwarded to the fire marshal upon completion of service. One copy of that record shall be maintained on the premises. G. Appeals regarding the administration of the fire extinguisher and fire -extinguishing system service permit and license approval process shall file their appeal with the fire chief and be heard before the board of appeals pursuant to Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 19.25.040 Automatic sprinkler systems. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained throughout every building constructed under the International Residential Code containing five or more attached dwelling units. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 56 - Packet Page 330 of 463 Residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in accordance with their approved listing in the dwelling. 19.25.045 Modifications, interpretations and appeals. A. The fire marshal may modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this chapter on written application by the owner or lessee when there are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. Approved modifications, including alternative materials and methods, shall observe the spirit of the code, secure the public safety and do substantial justice. The particulars of an approved modification shall be written by the fire marshal and kept in the records of the department. A signed copy shall be promptly given to the applicant. B. Fire department modifications and code interpretations shall be maintained in writing so as to aid in conformance and uniform application to the intent of ruling fire and life safety related codes, ordinances, and standards. C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the fire marshal to the fire chief. Such appeals shall be governed by the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 19.25.050 Fire protection water supplies. All fire hydrants, water main and appurtenance installations shall meet the provisions of this chapter as well as other applicable plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of Edmonds, as a condition of approval of subdivisions and building permits. 19.25.055 Location of public hydrants. A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city. B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Public hydrants spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes. C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public hydrants shall be spaced no more than 600 feet apart. If dead-end streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 600 feet. { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 331 of 463 -57- D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire hydrants shall be spaced an average of 300 feet apart. If dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 300 feet. 19.25.060 Location of private hydrants. A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use of the city for inspection and testing at reasonable times, and for fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall be connected to the city water main through a privately owned and maintained double detector check valve assembly. B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located so that a portion is more than 200 feet from a street, as measured along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire hydrants located at the building. Single-family dwellings with a fire -flow calculation area greater than 4,800 square feet may require a private hydrant. C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per minute may have fire hydrants on one side of the building only. There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any building larger than 5,000 square feet in the first floor area including covered parking and storage. When the required fire flow is 3,000 gallons per minute or greater, the fire hydrants shall be served by a looped main around the building or complex of buildings. D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around the perimeter line, 50 feet out of the buildings. All hydrants shall be placed in locations accessible to fire department vehicles adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. The fire marshal shall determine the location of fire hydrants depending on utility, topography and building location for maximum fire protection. 19.25.065 Mains and service lines. A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied by not less than six-inch looped water mains. All hydrants in areas other than single-family residential shall be supplied by not less than eight -inch looped water mains. Dead-end water mains to hydrants shall be at least eight inches in diameter, with the exception of mains up to 50 feet long which may be no less than six inches in diameter. B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be no less than six inches in diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 58 - Packet Page 332 of 463 in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less than eight inches in diameter. C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in the public right-of-way, are improved to permanent street or highway improvement standards, any water mains in the public right-of-way of said streets or highways that are substandard as to size or material according to applicable city standards shall be replaced with ductile iron water mains conforming to applicable city standards and plans. 19.25.070 Hydrant specifications. A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely below grade) is prohibited. B. Fire hydrants shall have two two -and -one -half -inch hose outlets and one four -and -one -half -inch pumper outlet. All outlets' ports shall have national standard thread. Additionally, the pumper outlet shall be provided with a four -inch Storz adapter. Fire hydrants shall meet the American Water Works Association, Standard No. C-502 and current city standards. C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices and city standards, and to the approval of the city engineer, who shall also approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There shall be a foot valve installed between the service main and the hydrant sufficient to permit the repair and replacement of the hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be installed to city standards. The location of all such valves installed shall be properly and accurately marked on as -built plans or drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail, two copies of which shall be furnished to the public works department. Valves shall be furnished with a standard valve box. D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade with the lowest outlet of the hydrant at least 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of clear area around the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on the control valve. The pumper port shall face the street, as determined by the fire marshal. E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from damage, the fire marshal may require hydrants to be protected by two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet long, made either of reinforced concrete or steel. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 59 - Packet Page 333 of 463 F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to these requirements, they shall be replaced with conforming hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established by the city's comprehensive plan. G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or perform any action which results in the obstruction of a fire hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route of approach. The owner -occupant of any area in which a hydrant is located shall be responsible for removing weed and tree growth from around the hydrant for a distance of not less than five feet. The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual area around the hydrant. H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be accomplished by city capital contract, developers (as a condition of development) or public works department employees. All installations are to be approved by the city engineer. I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves and hydrants shall be pressure tested, purified, flushed and sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works Association, Standard No. C-502. 19.25.075 Penalties. A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC including those standards of the National Fire Protection Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and amended herein or fails to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order made thereunder, or who builds in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who fails to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by decision of the city's board of appeals or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally for each and every such violation and noncompliance, respectively, be guilty of a gross misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC 5.50.020. B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited conditions exist or are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the above penalty IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 60 - Packet Page 334 of 463 shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. Chapter 19.30 ENERGY CODE Sections: 19.30.000 State Energy Code adopted. 19.30.000 State Energy Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27A.022, 19.27A.025 and 19.27A.045, the Washington State Energy Code, 2006 Edition, is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the energy code of the city of Edmonds, pursuant to RCW 19.27 and RCW 34.05 together with state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-11 WAC. Chapter 19.35 VENTILATION CODE Sections: 19.35.000 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code adopted. 19.35.005 Conflicts with other codes. 19.35.000 State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.020 and 19.27.190, the 2006 Edition of the Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the ventilation code of the city of Edmonds, pursuant to RCW 19.27.190 and together with the state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-13 WAC. 19.35.005 Conflicts with other codes. A. In addition to the requirements of this code, buildings shall conform to the provisions of the State Building Code, Chapter 19.27 RCW, and Chapters 51-50, 51-52, 51-54 and 51-56 WAC. In case of conflicts between the IBC, UPC, IMC and IFC as adopted and amended in Chapters 51-50, 51-52, 51-54 and 51-56 WAC, the provisions of Chapter 51-13 WAC shall govern. This code is not intended to abridge any safety or health requirements under any other applicable codes or ordinances. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 61 - Packet Page 335 of 463 B. Where, in any specific case, different sections of this code specify different materials, methods of construction or other requirements, the most restrictive shall govern. Where there is a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the specific requirement shall be applicable. Chapter 19.40 DANGEROUS BUILDINGS CODE Sections: 19.40.000 Dangerous buildings code adopted. 19.40.005 Purpose and code conflicts. 19.40.010 Section amendments. 19.40.000 Dangerous buildings code adopted. The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition, as published by the International Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the dangerous building code for the city of Edmonds, and the amendments contained herein. 19.40.005 Purpose and code conflicts. A. It is the purpose of this code to provide a just, equitable and practicable method, to be cumulative with and in addition to any other remedy provided by the International Building Code, International Residential Code, Uniform Housing Code or otherwise available by law, whereby buildings or structures which from any cause endanger the life, limb, health, property, safety or welfare of the general public or their occupants may be required to be repaired, vacated or demolished. The purpose of this code is not to create or otherwise establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by the terms of this code. B. If there is a conflict between the building code, dangerous building code, plumbing code, mechanical code or housing code, then the conditions, requirements, provisions or terms which provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and shall control. In addition to the remedies adopted in such code, criminal penalties may be imposed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.85 ECDC. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 62 - Packet Page 336 of 463 19.40.010 Section amendments. A. Chapter 2 Enforcement. 1. Section 205 Appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. B. Chapter 3 Definitions. 1. Section 302, Dangerous Building, is hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection 19 to read as follows: 19. Whenever a building or portion thereof is determined to be contaminated with toxic chemicals. A rebuttable presumption is hereby created that a building is contaminated with toxic chemicals if such a determination is made by the Snohomish County Health District, by the Washington State Department of Ecology, or by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in accordance with such criteria and standards as such public agencies shall establish. Chapter 19.45 HOUSING CODE Sections: 19.45.000 Uniform Housing Code adopted. 19.45.005 Purpose and code conflicts. 19.45.000 Uniform Housing Code adopted. The Uniform Housing Code (UHC), 1997 Edition, as published by the International Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the housing code for the city of Edmonds, subject to the following amendment: Section 203, Appeals, is replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 19.45.005 Purpose and code conflicts. A. The purpose of this code is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all residential buildings and structures within this jurisdiction. B. In cases where the Uniform Housing Code and the current adopted International Building Code and International Residential Code conflict or, if there is a conflict between the building code, dangerous buildings code, plumbing code, mechanical code or housing code, then the conditions, requirements, provisions or IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 63 - Packet Page 337 of 463 terms which provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and shall control. In addition to the remedies adopted in such code, criminal penalties may be imposed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.85 ECDC. Chapter 19.50 HISTORIC BUILDING CODE Sections: 19.50.000 State Historic Building Code adopted. 19.50.005 Purpose, scope and code conflicts. 19.50.010 Fully complete application. 19.50.015 Concurrent review. 19.50.020 Architectural design review — Optional vesting. 19.50.000 State Historic Building Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.120 and 19.27.074, and WSR 91-01-103, the 1991 Edition of the State Historic Building Code (SHBC) as printed and distributed by the Washington Association of Building Officials, including state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-19 WAC, is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the historic building code of the city of Edmonds subject to the following amendment: WAC 51- 19-280, Appeals, is replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 19.50.005 Purpose, scope and code conflicts. A. The provisions of the SHBC shall constitute the minimum standards for the preservation, restoration and related reconstruction, rehabilitation, strengthening, or relocation of buildings or structures, changes of occupancy and alteration or repair of designated historic buildings. This code applies only to designated historic buildings deemed so by the Edmonds historic preservation commission. It is the purpose of the SHBC to establish regulations and code alternatives to preserve original or restored architectural elements and features so that any alterations to the historic building or structure will result in a building or structure that will be less hazardous, based on minimum life safety and fire codes, than the existing building. B. If there is a conflict between the International Building Code, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, International Fuel Gas Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, International Mechanical Code or Uniform Housing Code, then the { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 338 of 463 O conditions, requirements, provisions or terms which provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and shall control. In addition to the remedies adopted in such code, criminal penalties may be imposed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.85 ECDC. 19.50.010 Fully complete application. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant's rights shall vest when a fully complete building permit application is filed pursuant to ECDC 19.00.015. 19.50.015 Concurrent review. An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application for any necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing pursuant to ECDC 19.00.020. 19.50.020 Architectural design review — Optional vesting. An applicant of a designated historic building may submit an augmented ADB application pursuant to ECDC 19.00.025. Chapter 19.55 ELECTRICAL CODE Sections: 19.55.000 National Electrical Code adopted. 19.55.005 When code effective. 19.55.010 Nonliability. 19.55.015 Conflicts — How resolved. 19.55.000 National Electrical Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the National Electrical Code, 2002 Edition, as published by the National Fire Protection Association, is hereby adopted as the electrical code for the city of Edmonds subject to the amendments made herein. The State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Electrical Inspection Section, Rules and Regulations for Installing Electric Wiring and Equipment and Administrative Rules, 2002 Edition, is hereby adopted as part of the electrical code of the city of Edmonds. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 65 - Packet Page 339 of 463 19.55.005 When code effective. If the state of Washington, through its duly designated electrical inspector or inspectors, for any reason fails to continue to inspect electrical installation, license the same or provide the standards, the provisions of the Edmonds electrical code as amended shall be applicable to all electrical installation in the city as if the state of Washington had not exercised jurisdiction of any kind. 19.55.010 Nonliability. This chapter shall not be construed to relieve or lessen the responsibility of any person owning, operating or installing any electrical equipment for damages to anyone injured by a defect of the equipment, nor shall the city or its agent be held as assuming any such liability by reason of the inspection under this code or the certificate of inspection issued by the building department. 19.55.015 Conflicts — How resolved. If there is any conflict between the electrical code of the city, the National Electrical Code and/or the rules and regulations as set forth by the state of Washington for electric wires and equipment, then the conditions, requirements, provisions or terms which provide, in the opinion of the building official, for the greatest public safety shall be observed and shall control. Chapter 19.60 MOVING BUILDINGS Sections: 19.60.000 Permit required. 19.60.005 Applicability. 19.60.010 Application requirements. 19.60.015 Pre -move inspection requirements and building upgrades. 19.60.020 Correction of defects. 19.60.000 Permit required. Any person who proposes to move an existing building into or through the city of Edmonds shall, before the move, apply for and obtain a moving permit from the building official. A moving permit is separate from, and in addition to, any and all other permits required to bring the moved building into compliance with current adopted codes and city regulations. Separate permit { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 340 of 463 approvals for grading, shoring, foundation, remodeling, repair or alteration may be imposed to bring the building to current adopted code standards and zoning compliance for height and setbacks. 19.60.005 Applicability. Building or structures moved into or within the city shall comply with the provisions of this code including the current adopted editions of the following codes: International Building Code, International Residential Code, International Mechanical Code, International Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Washington State Energy Code, Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, State Historic Building Code, Uniform Housing Code, and applicable state WAC amendments. 19.60.010 Application requirements. A. In order to obtain permits to move any building through, along, or across the streets or any public place within city limits, the building official shall determine permit submittal requirements which, at a minimum, shall contain: 1. Proposed route; 2. Location of any overhead utility lines or traffic signals along with their height along the route; and 3. Dimensions of building proposed to be moved. B. The permit application shall be reviewed by the building official, public works director, police chief, traffic engineer, fire department and any other affected city department. If the proposed moving will unduly interfere with the rights of the public as determined by the city engineer or designee, the permit shall be denied. Denial of the application by one department shall constitute denial of the permit by the city. C. A performance bond or frozen fund, pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, in an amount to be determined by the building official shall be posted prior to permit issuance guaranteeing the completion of all required site development improvements or site clean-up and/or repair of damage to public property no later than 180 days after the permit is issued. The bond or frozen fund will be exonerated upon final project approval provided all required site restoration and/or improvements are installed, inspected and approved to city standards. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 67 - Packet Page 341 of 463 D. The moving contractor shall be state licensed and carry general public liability insurance for the amount no less than $1,000,000, valid during entire building moving operations, and the insurance policy shall name the city as an additional named insured, against the injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from or out of the city's involvement in the permitting process for the project. E. As a condition of obtaining a moving permit, the moving contractor shall assume all liability for any damage to public property by such moving operations. Repair of damage to any public property improvement shall be completed under a valid permit within 30 days of date of notice. Emergency repair work performed by city crews to repair damage to public improvements shall be charged against the moving contractor. 19.60.015 Pre -move inspection requirements and building upgrades. A. Upon application and payment of the building moving permit fee, the building official shall notify the applicant of the date and time of his pre -move inspection. The pre -move inspection shall be made at the original location of the building before it is moved. B. The applicant shall remove from the building as much of the interior wall and ceiling coverings as is necessary in the judgment of the building official to conduct a thorough inspection of the wiring, plumbing and structural features of the building. The building official shall determine what structural, energy, ventilation, plumbing, mechanical and life -safety upgrades shall be imposed on any building moved into or within city limits in compliance with current adopted codes. Designated historic buildings are also subject to provisions of Chapter 19.50 ECDC. 19.60.020 Correction of defects. If, at or after the time of the inspection, the building official notifies the applicant that any portion of the building, electrical wiring or rough plumbing is in any way in violation of the ordinances of the city of Edmonds, so that compliance will require a replacement of any parts or materials used, then any defective parts or materials shall be removed from the building before it is moved. Any corrections required to comply with the ECDC, IBC and IRC shall be completed and inspected before final approval and occupancy is granted. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 68 - Packet Page 342 of 463 Chapter 19.65 MARINAS Sections: 19.65.000 Application. 19.65.005 Building code — Compliance required. 19.65.010 Design live loads. 19.65.015 Materials. 19.65.020 Area and location requirements. 19.65.025 Fire requirements. 19.65.000 Application. The provisions of this chapter apply to the construction, changes, repair and use of a small boat marina providing covered floating boat moorage within the city. A marina is a basin of safe anchorage providing moorage for small vessels. 19.65.005 Building code — Compliance required. All construction on or in connection with a marina shall comply with all the provisions of ECDC Title 19 including permits, permit fees and penalties and all other applicable ordinances of the city and other applicable laws. 19.65.010 Design live loads. A. Decks. Float decks shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per square foot minimum. B. Roofs. The roof structures shall have a design live load of at least 25 pounds per square foot minimum. C. Ramps. The ramps to floats shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per square foot minimum. 19.65.015 Materials. A. Roofs. Roof coverings shall be non-combustible. B. Floats. Floating structures and floats shall be material of a type approved by the building official. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 69 - Packet Page 343 of 463 19.65.020 Area and location requirements. A. Length of Floats. The maximum length of any combination of floats shall be 500 feet from the shore end of the gangplank to the outer end of the main float. A main float is a center or side float connected by a ramp to the shore, being fixed laterally by a system of piling but allowed to move vertically, and may have finger floats connected at intervals. B. Length of Roofs. The maximum length of any roof over floats shall be 400 feet, measured along a main float. At least 75 percent of the exterior walls shall be open. The maximum area covered shall be 30,000 square feet over any single main float area. C. Separation. The minimum separation of covered moorage shall be 20 feet. D. Floats, piers, and walkways shall provide an aisle not less than 44 inches in width. 19.65.025 Fire requirements. A. Hydrants. The maximum distance from any point on a float system to an approved fire hydrant shall be 600 feet, except for fuel floats. Approved fire extinguishers shall be placed at covered moorage along the main float system at intervals not exceeding 120 feet from any single covered boat stall. B. Fuel Floats. 1. Fuel floats shall be constructed of gas -resistant flotation material and shall be separated from other floats by at least 80 feet of open water. 2. All fuel storage tanks shall be located underground. 3. All fuel lines shall be provided with flexible connections from shore to floating facilities. 4. Fire extinguishers shall be provided near fuel dispensers as approved by the Edmonds fire department. 5. Gangplank access from shore to fuel floats shall be within 175 feet of fuel dispensers. 6. Fresh water taps shall be available on fuel floats. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 70 - Packet Page 344 of 463 7. All portions of a fuel float shall be located within 300 feet of a fire hydrant. 8. Moorage at any fuel float shall be prohibited and unlawful except during the shortest time necessary to take on fuel. Moorage shall be unlawful at any fuel float at any time the fuel pumps are not open for business and physically attended by the fuel pump proprietor, his agent, employee, or port tenant trained to a fire department approved environmental and safety standard. It shall be the independent responsibility of the fuel pump proprietor, vessel operator, and vessel owner to comply with this subsection and each said person or class of persons shall be subject to the penalties of ECC 5.50.020 for any and all violations hereof. C. Fire Protection Standard Adopted. The "Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards" 2006 Edition of the National Fire Protection Association Publication No. 303 is hereby adopted to provide the minimum acceptable level of safety to life and property from fire and electrical hazards at marinas and boatyards. In the event of any conflict between provisions of the fire and electrical codes of the city of Edmonds as adopted by this title, the fire and electrical codes shall prevail. Chapter 19.70 FEES Sections: 19.70.000 Scope. 19.70.005 Payment of fees. 19.70.010 Schedule of permit fees. 19.70.015 Establishing building construction valuation. 19.70.020 Work commencing before permit issuance. 19.70.025 Refunds. 19.70.000 Scope. Fees associated with ECDC Title 19 including plan review, permit, inspection and related development or mitigation fees are established by this chapter and as set forth in ECDC 15.00.020. Fees may be altered pursuant to city Resolution 997. 19.70.005 Payment of fees. A permit shall not be considered valid until the fees prescribed by law have been paid, nor shall an amendment to a permit be released until the additional fee, if any, has been paid. Before issuance of any permit authorized by this code, the building { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 345 of 463 -71- official shall collect all applicable permit fees. Separate permits and fees shall apply as indicated elsewhere in this code and shall be collected prior to permit issuance. 19.70.010 Schedule of permit fees. For buildings, structures, grading, gas, mechanical and plumbing systems or alterations requiring a permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required, in accordance with this chapter and ECDC 15.00.020. Fee schedules are on file in the city clerk's office. A. Plan Review Fee. Before accepting a set of plans and specifications for plan review, the building official shall collect the full plan review fee. Plan review fees shall be in addition to, and a percentage of, the required permit fee as calculated pursuant to ECDC 19.70.015. B. Permit Fee. Before issuing a building permit and releasing approved plans, the building official shall collect the full building permit fees including supplemental required permit fees, inspection fees and any additional plan review fee or violation compliance fee, development fee or mitigation fee outstanding at the time of permit issuance. Building construction valuation shall be determined by ECDC 19.70.015. C. Inspection Fee. Inspection and reinspection fees shall be paid prior to any inspection by city staff. Inspection fees are established and set forth in this chapter. D. Related Development or Mitigation Fees. The payment of the fee for construction, alteration, removal or demolition done in connection, or concurrently with, the work authorized by a building permit shall not relieve the applicant or holder of the permit from the payment of other fees that are prescribed by law. Fees for other permits or related development fees shall be as set forth in ECDC 15.00.020. 19.70.015 Establishing building construction valuation. The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated building construction valuation at time of application. Building construction valuation for the purpose of calculating permit fees shall include total value of work including fair -market labor and materials with equipment needed to complete the work, including but not limited to all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 72 - Packet Page 346 of 463 systems and any other permanent equipment. If, in the opinion of the building official, the building construction valuation is underestimated on the application, the building official shall assign a building construction valuation. Permit valuation for new construction shall be based on square footage building construction valuation as established by the building official. 19.70.020 Work commencing before permit issuance. Any person who commences any work regulated by this title including work on a building, electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to a violation compliance fee established by the building official pursuant to the city's fee schedule adopted by resolution that shall be in addition to the required permit fees. The violation compliance fee shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The payment of such violation compliance fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Violation compliance fees are set forth in this chapter. 19.70.025 Refunds. The building official may authorize refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee no later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. Chapter 19.75 STREET NAMES AND ADDRESS NUMBERING Sections: 19.75.000 Adoption of street name map and criteria. 19.75.005 Adoption of property and building numbering system and criteria. 19.75.010 Other street names and premises numbers prohibited. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 73 - Packet Page 347 of 463 19.75.000 Adoption of street name map and criteria. A. There is hereby established a uniform system of designating street names/numbers in the city of Edmonds. The street names/numbers are those depicted on that map entitled, "official street map," a copy of which has been authenticated by the mayor of the city and the attestation of the city clerk. The map and all explanatory matter on the map is re -adopted and affirmed and by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Official street name/number designations are the responsibility of the city engineer. B. Pursuant to ECDC 18.50.030, any change to the name or number of any street on the official street map shall be by action of the city council approving an ordinance changing the official street map. C. The city engineer shall maintain and update the official street map and shall designate/approve public and private street names/numbers in accordance with this chapter. All approved street names/numbers shall be forwarded to the United States Postal Service (USPS), public and private utilities, law enforcement agencies, emergency services providers, and other persons of new or corrected street names/numbers. The city engineer shall develop policies and guidelines for street names and numbers in accordance with the following guidelines: 1. New street designations shall be in accordance with the Snohomish County grid system and the official street map. 2. When descriptive street names (as opposed to numerical street designations) are allowed by subsection (C)(1) of this section, preference shall be for descriptive names with logical relationship to locale or geographic area, and avoidance of private individual names. 3. Facilitation of map reading and indexing to assist in rapid location of streets and addresses. 4. Avoidance of multiple and/or alternative names for single street sections and requirement of selection of a primary street designation to assist in the Enhanced 9-1-1 grid system for emergency services dispatching. 5. Any other appropriate and applicable standards concerning street and street designations as well as current department of public works policies, guidelines, or rules for naming public street as determined by the director. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 74 - Packet Page 348 of 463 19.75.005 Adoption of property and building numbering system and criteria. A. There is hereby established a uniform system for numbering properties, buildings and primary structures in the city of Edmonds. The official building and property address map depicting all issued property address numbers is maintained by the building official or designee. The building official assigns, maintains and corrects addresses for the city of Edmonds and shall notify the United States Post Service (USPS), emergency services providers and other persons of new or corrected addresses. B. Addresses shall conform to the numerical grid system established by Enhanced 9-1-1. The number utilized by each building or property shall be that number within the system assigned by the building official. Addresses are assigned based on the location of the driveway access or house frontage to a street and only one address is allowed per building on any lot. Numbers assigned during any previous numbering system that fit within the grid system are hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect. C. The building official shall require any address not in conformance or any address that poses any problem or confusion for safety and emergency response be changed within 30 days of written notification from the city of Edmonds. D. All owners or occupants of all buildings and structures in the city of Edmonds, other than garages or other similar buildings or structures of a secondary nature to the primary building or structure, shall affix and maintain the officially designated premises number to the building or structure pursuant to ECDC 19.00.005(B)(1). When topography or vegetation may obscure vision from the street, the numerals shall be affixed as to be as reasonably visible from the street. E. Where any commercial building, multiple -family residential structure, or other similar structure has more than one entrance serving separate occupants, a suite designation or apartment number shall be assigned to each entrance serving a tenant or resident in addition to the number assigned to the principal entrance of the building or structure. The unit designations shall be progressive as assigned in the progressive direction of the street and per the property numbering system approved by this code. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 75 - Packet Page 349 of 463 F. All requests for a building or property address change shall be made in writing to the building official and all of the following conditions shall be present in order for the request to be approved: 1. An obvious error shall exist (i.e., the building was addressed off a street not associated with the site, the building or property addresses are out of sequence, duplicate address exists), etc. 2. The existing address could delay fire, police or emergency services from finding the location in an emergency. 3. The fire department agrees the address change is necessary. 19.75.010 Other street names and premises numbers prohibited. It is unlawful for any owner or occupant of any premises, building or structure to display a street name or premises number other than those officially designated pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, subject to penalties per Chapter 5.50 ECC and Chapter 20.110 ECDC. Chapter 19.80 BOARD OF APPEALS Sections: 19.80.000 Purpose and applicability. 19.80.005 Application and fee. 19.80.010 Board of appeals membership. 19.80.015 Board of appeals procedures. 19.80.020 Powers and duties of the board. 19.80.025 Appeals from decisions of the board. 19.80.030 Snohomish County regional board of appeals. 19.80.000 Purpose and applicability. A. All properly filed appeals pursuant to the adopted codes of ECDC Title 19 shall be heard by the board of appeals created by this chapter. The board shall have no authority to review administrative decisions or grant modifications to the provisions of any administrative chapter as adopted by ECDC Title 19, nor can the board waive a code requirement. B. The board of appeals shall hear appeals from the building official's interpretation of the adopted building codes, determinations of suitable alternative methods and materials, and { WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 350 of 463 -76- any other appeal delegated to a board of appeals pursuant to the state building codes, including but not limited to the International Building Code, the International Residential Code, the International Fire Code, the Uniform Housing Code, the State Historical Building Code, the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, the International Fuel Gas Code, the International Mechanical Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code and any and all other codes adopted pursuant to the direction and authority of Chapter 19.27 RCW. C. The provisions of the state building codes as adopted by the city are not intended to prevent the use of any material, alternate design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code, provided any alternative has been approved and its use authorized by the building official or on appeal or request for review by the board of appeals. 19.80.005 Application and fee. An application for appeal shall be filed with the building official upon a departmental form within 10 days of the date of formal written decision. The application shall be accompanied by the required fee as set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC and shall be complete in all aspects before the hearing shall be scheduled. Failure to supplement an incomplete application within 10 business days of filing shall constitute an incomplete application and the administrative recourse of appeal shall be denied. 19.80.010 Board of appeals membership. A. There is created a board of appeals consisting of members who are qualified by experience and training to pass on matters pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the city of Edmonds. The technical expertise of board members shall be supplied through training or experience as an architect, builder, general contractor, developer, fire inspector, mechanical engineer, electrician, plumber, or structural engineer. The board members shall be active, practicing members of one of the prior listed disciplines or professions and include one lay person. Technical members of the board shall be appointed by the mayor and must reside in Snohomish County; the lay person shall be a resident of the city of Edmonds. B. The board shall consist of nine voting members and four alternates appointed by the mayor. The board shall be comprised of persons with the following backgrounds or professional designations: IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 77 - Packet Page 351 of 463 1. Position One. Structural engineer registered by the state of Washington with at least five years' experience. 2. Position Two. Certified fire protection specialist with at least five years' experience. 3. Position Three. Mechanical engineer registered by the state of Washington with at least five years' experience. 4. Position Four. Architect registered by the state of Washington with at least five years' experience. 5. Position Five. Electrician licensed by the state of Washington with at least five years' experience. 6. Position Six. Journeyman plumber licensed by the state of Washington with at least five years' experience 7. Positions Seven and Eight. General contractor, developer or builder licensed by the state of Washington with at least five years' experience. 8. Position Nine. Citizen member of the city of Edmonds who is not associated with the building industry. 9. Alternates. Four additional alternates will be chosen to be called by the board during absence or disqualification of a member. Alternate members are required to meet one of the technical qualifications required for board membership. In the absence of any member of the board, the alternates shall be authorized to fill such temporary vacancy, regardless of the resulting composition of the board, with the full power accorded the regular member. The board chairman shall appoint the alternate. A permanent vacancy shall be filled by an alternate who is appointed by the mayor. Alternates may appear at all meetings but shall not vote unless they are filling a temporary vacancy. C. Building Official Duties. 1. Hearing Secretary. The secretary of the board shall be the building official. The secretary shall be the custodian of the records, shall conduct official correspondence of the board and generally be responsible for clerical work of the board. The secretary shall be present at the appeal meetings and shall present all relevant information regarding appeals to the board, including the application and other information submitted by the appellant prior to the hearing. The secretary shall notify all interested parties regarding matters of the board. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 78 - Packet Page 352 of 463 2. Building Department Representatives. The building official shall be an ex officio member of the board without voting power. D. Fire Department Representatives. The chief of the fire prevention bureau, or his authorized representative, shall be an ex officio member to the board without voting power. 19.80.015 Board of appeals procedures. A. Terms. As of the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title, the mayor shall appoint the initial board members to overlapping terms. Two technical members shall be appointed to a one-year term, two technical members shall be appointed to two- year terms, two technical members shall be appointed to three-year terms, and the remaining members shall be appointed to three-year terms. Following initial terms, subsequent terms of all board members and alternates shall be for three calendar years. No member of the board shall serve more than three consecutive full terms, or a total of more than nine consecutive calendar years. B. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings may be held once each month, or as often as may be required. At the first regular meeting of each calendar year, the board shall elect a chairman and a vice chairman. The chairman of the board shall require that all members of the board be polled during voting at the meeting. Seven members of the board shall constitute a quorum. C. Special Meetings. Special meetings may be held by the chairman and at such times as the board shall determine. The board, the city or an appellant may request a special meeting. Any special meeting held at the request of an appellant shall be paid for by the appellant in the amount set forth in Chapter 19.70 ECDC. Five members of the board shall constitute a quorum at special meetings. D. Executive Sessions. Executive sessions of the board may be called pursuant to the State Open Public Meetings law by the chairman or the vice chairman of the board and are not open to the public. The building official shall attend as secretary. E. Public Notice. Public notice shall be given of all meetings. Upon written receipt and confirmation of a complete appeal of a request, notice shall be sent to the fire department, the health department, the city attorney and the owner of the real estate and parties within 100 feet affected by the request. No hearing shall be scheduled until 15 days after the required hearing notifications are IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 79 - Packet Page 353 of 463 mailed. Meetings shall be open to the public. The appellant, the appellants' representative, the building official, and any person whose interests are affected shall be given an opportunity to be heard. F. Oath/Subpoena. The chairman may administer oaths, accept affirmations and compel the attendance of witnesses. A failure or refusal to appear in response to a subpoena issued by the board shall constitute a violation of these adopted codes and be subject to the penalties as outlined in Chapter 19.85 ECDC. G. Department/Interested Party. At any public meeting a representative of the city building and fire department and any other interested party may appear in person, by agent or by attorney, offer evidence and testimony and cross-examine witnesses. All evidence and testimony shall be presented publicly. The board may take judicial notice of facts to the same extent and in the same manner as courts of record and may consider relevant facts within the personal knowledge of any member of the board that are stated into the record by such member. H. Recording. All meetings before the board shall be recorded. I. Compensation. The board shall receive no compensation regardless of number or type of cases heard. J. Removal. Board members shall be removed from office by the mayor prior to the end of their terms only for just cause. Any member who is unavailable for three consecutive appeal hearings shall be automatically removed and an alternate appointed as provided for herein. K. Conflict of Interest. Members with a material or financial interest in a matter before the board shall declare such interest and refrain from participating in discussions, deliberations, and voting on such matters. 19.80.020 Powers and duties of the board. A. The board shall adopt rules and procedures governing all proceedings consistent with the provisions set forth herein. The rules and regulations shall include meeting location, meeting time, procedures, contents of a complete appeal application and time to be allotted for each case. B. Subject to the limitations enumerated herein, the board shall have and may exercise the following powers: IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 80 - Packet Page 354 of 463 1. The board shall have no authority relative to the interpretation of the administrative provisions of any of the state building codes, nor shall the board be empowered to waive any requirement of any such code. 2. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the board to hear any appeal, nor any request for deviation of design or alternative methods with respect to any property lying within a recognized landslide hazard and earth subsidence area or which is otherwise subject to the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC including effecting map changes. 3. The board, on review, may approve the use of any material, alternate design or method of construction providing that it finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of this code and that the material, design, or method is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the applicable code in suitability, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety and sanitation. The decision of the building official shall not be overturned unless the board shall find that the following conditions exist: a. That the appellant properly applied for an appeal; b. That sufficient evidence, proof or testing reports were submitted by the appellant that substantiated claims of equivalency; C. That the proposed modification or alternate will not weaken the general purpose of the adopted code; d. That the proposed modification or alternate will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the adopted code; e. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the public health and safety; f. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the building; and g. That the proposed modification or alternate will not adversely affect the fire safety of the building. 4. To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any notice or order made by the building official and/or fire marshal in the enforcement of the adopted codes in this title. The board shall have the power to stay the enforcement of any order issued by the building and/or fire department unless the building IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 355 of 463 official and/or fire marshal certifies that a stay of the order or denial would, in the opinion of the building official and/or fire marshal, cause imminent peril to life or property. A stay shall not constitute board approval, shall be personal to the appellant and not transferable, and shall be subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the board. Any determination or order of the building and/or fire department shall be presumed to be correct until evidence is introduced that would support a contrary determination. 5. Whenever the owner or legally responsible person of an alleged unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition does not agree with the order from the building official and/or fire marshal as to the correction to be made, he shall have the right to appeal to the board within 10 days from the date of said order. In his appeal, the appellant shall state how he proposes to make the unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition safe and the board may require the appellant to submit detailed engineering analysis or recommendations, accompanied by plans and specifications prepared by a state licensed architect or registered professional engineer, as prescribed in this adopted code. The board, in hearing such appeals, may require substantiating data concerning the removal or other remedial steps to be taken to render the unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition safe. In any matter in which an order or notice relating to an unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition is appealed, the building and/or fire department may certify to the board that the unsafe building, structure, utility or other condition could become an imminent hazard, in which case the board shall schedule a meeting within five business days to hear said appeal. C. Burden of Proof. 1. The appellant bears the burden of proof in any proceeding before the board. If there is insufficient evidence of compliance with any of the provisions of this code or evidence that any material or construction does not conform to the requirements of this code, the appeal from the decision of the building official shall be denied. 2. The board may continue any proceeding in order to permit the appellant to provide proof of compliance through tests conducted in accordance with general engineering practice and best scientific evidence. Such tests shall be made by the appellant and at no expense to the jurisdiction. Test methods shall be as specified by the applicable building code or by other recognized testing standards. If there are not recognized and accepted test IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 82 - Packet Page 356 of 463 methods for the proposed alternate, testing methods shall utilize generally accepted engineering practice and best scientific method. Reports of such tests shall be retained and made a part of record of the proceedings. D. Decision of the Board. 1. The board shall render formal written decisions within 10 days date of the hearing. Every decision of the board shall be based upon findings of fact and every finding of fact shall be supported in the record of its proceedings. A mere finding or recitation of the enumerated conditions unaccompanied by findings of specific facts shall not be deemed findings of fact and shall not be deemed compliance with the code. The building official shall take immediate action in accordance with the decision of the board. 2. Copies of the decision shall be forwarded to the appellant, a copy shall be placed in the appeal file and copies shall be made available to any person as a matter of public information. Decisions shall be filed with the building or fire department as a matter of public record. 3. In the exercise of the powers described above, the board may reverse or affirm, wholly or in part, or may modify the order, requirements, decision or determination appealed from the board, may impose conditions or requirements as deemed necessary and may hold cases in abeyance until proper information needed by the board is supplied. 19.80.025 Appeals from decisions of the board. A. The filing of a land use petition for review shall not stay proceedings upon the decision appealed but the court may grant a stay in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act. B. All decisions of the board are appealable by Land Use Petition Act to Snohomish County superior court. 19.80.030 Snohomish County regional board of appeals. As to such time that a regional board of appeals is established within Snohomish County, the city reserves the right to replace the local city board of appeals with said regional board once an interlocal agreement is approved and adopted by council action. Chapter 19.85 PENALTIES IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 83 - Packet Page 357 of 463 Sections: 19.85.000 Applicability. 19.85.000 Applicability. The provisions of all adopted codes within ECDC Title 19 shall be subject to penalties as described herein. It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or other organization to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure in the city, or cause the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Any person, firm, corporation or other organization violating any of the provisions of ECDC Title 19 as adopted herein, or other provision of this chapter, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of ECDC Title 19 herein is committed, continued or permitted, and upon the conviction thereof of such violation, and each violation thereof such person, firm, corporation or other organization, and the officers, directors and managers thereof shall be punishable as set forth in ECC 5.50.020 and Chapter 20.110 ECDC. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the discretion of the city to seek any other available civil, statutory or common law remedies. Chapter 19.90 LIMITATION OF BENEFITED AND PROTECTED CLASSES Sections: 19.90.000 Limitation of benefited and protected classes. 19.90.000 Limitation of benefited and protected classes. The building and supplemental codes adopted by ECDC Title 19 are for the purpose of providing for and promoting the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Nothing in this title shall be interpreted to create or otherwise establish any particular class or group of persons who will or would be especially protected or benefited by the adoption of any code in this title. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 84 - Packet Page 358 of 463 Chapter 19.95 CONVERSION CONDOMINIUMS Sections: 19.95.010 Definitions. 19.95.020 Relocation assistance. 19.95.030 Violations. 19.95.040 Civil penalty. 19.95.050 Enforcement. 19.95.010 Definitions. The following words and phrases used in this chapter shall have the meaning set forth in this section: A. "Condominium" means real property, portions of which are designated for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the owners of those portions. Real property is not a condominium unless the undivided interests in the common elements are vested in the unit owners, and unless a declaration and a survey map and plans have been recorded pursuant to this chapter. B. "Conversion condominium" means a condominium (1) that at any time before creation of the condominium was lawfully occupied wholly or partially by a tenant or subtenant for residential purposes pursuant to a rental agreement, oral or written, express or implied, for which the tenant or subtenant had not received the notice described in subsection (2) of this definition; or (2) that, at any time within 12 months before the conveyance of, or acceptance of an agreement to convey, any unit therein other than to a declarant or any affiliate of a declarant, was lawfully occupied wholly or partially by a residential tenant of a declarant or an affiliate of a declarant and such tenant was not notified in writing, prior to lawfully occupying a unit or executing a rental agreement, whichever event first occurs, that the unit was part of a condominium and subject to sale. "Conversion condominium" shall not include a condominium in which, before the effective date of the ordinance codified herein, any unit therein had been conveyed or been made subject to an agreement to convey to any transferee other than a declarant or an affiliate of a declarant. C. "Declarant" means any person who: 1. Executes as declarant the document, however denominated, that creates a condominium by setting forth the information IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 85 - Packet Page 359 of 463 required by RCW 64.34.216 and any amendments to that document; or 2. Reserves any special declarant right in the declaration; or 3. Exercises special declarant rights or to whom special declarant rights are transferred; or 4. Is the owner of a fee interest in the real property which is subjected to the declaration at the time of the recording of an instrument pursuant to RCW 64.34.316 and who directly or through one or more affiliates is materially involved in the construction, marketing, or sale of units in the condominium created by the recording of the instrument; or 5. Undertakes to convert, sell, or offer for sale units in a conversion condominium. D. "Director" means the development services director or his designee. E. "Notice of conversion" means the 90-day notice pursuant to RCW 64.34.440(1) required to be given by the declarant or his agent to residential tenants and subtenants in possession of a portion of a conversion condominium. F. "Person" means a natural person, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, trust, association, or other legal entity. G. "Tenant" or "subtenant" means any person who occupies and has a leasehold interest in a rental unit under a lawful rental agreement, whether oral or written, express or implied. H. "Unit" means a physical portion of the condominium designed for separate ownership, the boundaries of which are described pursuant to RCW 64.34.216(1)(d). 19.95.020 Relocation assistance. A. Declarant shall pay relocation assistance of $500.00 per unit to tenants and subtenants who elect not to purchase a unit and who are in lawful occupancy for residential purposes of a unit, and whose monthly household income from all sources, on the date of the notice of conversion, was less than an amount equal to 80 percent of the monthly median income for comparably sized households in the Seattle -Everett Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area, as defined and established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 86 - Packet Page 360 of 463 B. The household size of a unit shall be based on the number of natural persons actually in lawful occupancy of the unit on the date of the notice of conversion. C. The tenant or subtenant actually in lawful occupancy of the unit shall be entitled to the relocation assistance. D. Relocation assistance shall be paid on or before the date the tenant or subtenant vacates and shall be in addition to any damage deposit or other compensation or refund to which the tenant is otherwise entitled. Unpaid rent or other amounts owed by the tenant or subtenant to the landlord may be offset against the relocation assistance. E. Rights of tenants and subtenants set forth in the notice of conversion pursuant to RCW 64.34.440(1) must set forth tenants' and subtenants' right to relocation assistance as provided in this section. 19.95.030 Violations. It shall be a violation of this chapter for a declarant to fail or refuse to comply with the provisions of this chapter. Each tenant and subtenant who is subjected to a violation of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a separate violation. Each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation. 19.95.040 Civil penalty. Any person who fails or refuses to comply with the provisions or requirements of this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty in the amount of $100.00 per violation per day from the date that the violation is first committed until the declarant complies with the requirements of this chapter. 19.95.050 Enforcement. A. Tenants and subtenants subjected to violations of the provisions of this chapter, or their agents, may file a complaint with the director. The director is authorized and directed to receive complaints and conduct such investigations as are deemed necessary such as contacting declarants and seeking explanation for apparent violations. B. Whenever it is determined that there has been a violation of this chapter, the director is authorized to pursue, at the director's discretion, enforcement of the code pursuant to provisions Chapter 20.110 ECDC. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 87 - Packet Page 361 of 463 Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. IWSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 88 - Packet Page 362 of 463 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, TITLE 19, TO ADOPT THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2006 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, 2006 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 2006 ENERGY CODE AND THE 2006 STATE VENTILATION INDOOR QUALITY CODE, ALONG WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING CITY CODES IN SAID TITLE IN ORDER TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS, GRAMMATICAL CHANGES, CROSS REFERENCE CHANGES AND PROVIDING WORDING CLARIFICATIONS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS664610.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 89 - Packet Page 363 of 463 AM-1047 2.T. Amend City Code to Eliminate a Scrivener's Error Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase Submitted For: City Attorney Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: A rtinn infnrmatinn Subject Title Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds Community Development Code Section 16.30.040 by the repeal of Subsection (B). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative This is a house keeping ordinance to eliminate a scrivener's error. An administrative setback adjustment process was repealed by Ordinance No. 2922, however, Code Section 16.30.040(B) continues to contain a reference to this process. The attached ordinance amends the provisions of Edmonds Community Development Code Section 16.30.040 by the repeal of Subsection (B). Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox 1 City Clerk 2 Mayor 3 Final Approval Form Started By: Sandy Chase Approved By Date Status Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:17 PM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 04:28 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:45 PM APRV Started On: 06/13/2007 04:06 PM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 364 of 463 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 6/13/07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC SECTION 16.30.040 BY THE REPEAL OF SUBSECTION (B), AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, an administrative setback adjustment process was repealed by Ordinance No. 2922, and process, and WHEREAS, ECDC 16.30.040(B) continues to contain a reference to such WHEREAS, such reference should be eliminated, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECDC Section 16.30.040 is hereby amended by the repeal of subsection (B) and the relettering or renumbering as appropriate of the remaining provisions of the paragraph in order to eliminate a scrivener's error created by the adoption of Ordinance No. 2922. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. {WSS665049.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Page 365 of 463 APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Im W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS665049.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 366 of 463 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC SECTION 16.30.040 BY THE REPEAL OF SUBSECTION (B), AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS665049.DOC;1/00006.900000/1- 3 - Packet Page 367 of 463 AM-1050 Reappointment of Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Member Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Stephen Clifton Submitted For: Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Time: Department: Community Services Type: Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Reappointment of Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Member. 2.U. Consent Action Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Reappoint Dave Earling to the Edmonds Public Facilities Board of Directors for four-year teen. Previous Council Action The City Council appointed Dave Earling on April 6, 2004 to the Edmonds Public Facilities District Board to serve the remainder of Board member James Monroe's term. Narrative Narrative: On June 19, 2001, the Edmonds City Council approved the appointment of a five -member Public Facilities District (PFD) board. Ordinance No. 3358 states that all board members are to serve four-year staggered terms. Initially terms lengths were established for one, two, three and four-year terms to create a staggered schedule. John McGibben and Terry Vehrs were selected to serve for four years, Kay Mahaffey for three years, James Monroe for two years, and Jan Conner for one year. Ms. Connor was reappointed on June 18, 2002 to a four year term. Although James Monroe was reappointed on July 1, 2003, he found it necessary to resign in February 2004; the City Council subsequently appointed Dave Earling on April 6, 2004 to serve the remainder of the term. Dave Earling's term expires on June 19, 2007. At this time, the Edmonds PFD Board has requested that the City Council reappoint Mr. Earling for a four-year term in order to maintain continuity and stability on the Board, particularly through the remaining fundraising and construction phases of the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Mr. Earling has served effectively and is interested in continuing to serve on the PFD Board. Board member Earling's term will expire on June 19, 2011. Recommended Action: Reappoint Dave Earling to the Edmonds Public Facilities Board of Directors for one four-year term. Fiscal Impact Attachments No files) attached. Form Routing/Status Packet Page 368 of 463 Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 10:02 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Started On: 06/14/2007 08:34 Clifton AM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 369 of 463 AM-1051 Appointment of Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Member To Fill Vacancy Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Stephen Clifton Submitted For: Edmonds Public Facilities District Time: 5 Minutes Department: Community Services Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Appointment of Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Member to fill vacancy. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Appoint Maria Montalvo to the Edmonds Public Facilities Board of Directors to fulfill the remainder of a four-year term previously held by Jan Conner. Previous Council Action Narrative 3. On June 19, 2001, the Edmonds City Council approved the appointment of a five -member Public Facilities District (PFD) board. Ordinance No. 3358 states that all board members are to serve four-year staggered terms. Initial term lengths were established for one, two, three, and four-year terms to create a staggered schedule. John McGibbon and Terry Vehrs were selected to serve for four years, Kay Mahaffey for three years, James Monroe for two years, and Jan Conner for one year. Although James Monroe was reappointed on July 1, 2003, he resigned in February 2004; the City Council subsequently appointed Dave Earling on April 6, 2004 to serve the remainder of the term. Ms. Connor, who was reappointed on June 18, 2002 and again on June 6, 2006 to four-year terms, resigned on May 31, 2007. Pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35.57.010, a PFD shall be governed by a board of directors consisting of five (5) members selected as follows: (a)(i) Two members appointed by the legislative authority of the City or Town; and (a)(ii) Three members appointed by the legislative authority based on recommendations from local organizations that may include, but are not limited to, the local chamber of commerce, local economic development council, and local labor council, etc. The position held by Ms. Conner must be filled by someone recommended by the entities referenced under subsection (a)(ii). On April 9, 2007, a press release was issued soliciting for individuals interested in serving on the PFD Board for the remainder of the term related to the position previously held by Ms. Conner. After reviewing resumes and conducting interviews on May 15 and 17, 2007, the Edmonds PFD Board recommends Maria Montalvo be appointed to the vacant position. Ms. Montalvo is also the preferred choice of the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce. PFD Executive Director Joe Packet Page 370 of 463 McIalwain will be giving a brief introduction during the June 19, 2007 City Council meeting. If Ms. Montalvo is appointed to the Edmonds Public Facilities District Board by the City Council, her term will expire on June 19, 2010. Fiscal Impact Attachments No files) attached. Form RoutinuJStatus Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 03:48 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Started On: 06/14/2007 08:36 Clifton AM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 371 of 463 AM-1042 Arts Commission Annual Report and Presentation of Scholarship Recipient Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: Submitted By: Department: Review Committee: Action: 06/19/2007 Frances Chapin Time: 20 Minutes Parks and Recreation Type: Information Tnfnrm atinn Subject Title Edmonds Arts Commission Annual Report for 2006, and presentation of 2007 scholarship recipient. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative Edmonds Arts Commission Chair Pamela Harold will present the 2006 Annual Report. Highlights of the report include the successful 21 st annual writers' conference held in October in conjunction with a number of partnership activities during Arts and Humanities month; creation of a new Public Art Walking Tour Brochure; participation in development of the Streetscape Plan; and presentation of both performing arts and visual arts in a variety of venues. The printed Annual Review brochure will be distributed at the Council Meeting. Arts Commissioner Todd Timmcke will introduce the recipient of a 2007 Performing Arts Scholarship, Sarah Pumphrey. Awarding Literary and Performing Arts Scholarships is a key part of the Arts Commission's program in arts education and fostering participation in the arts. This is the 20th year that scholarship funds have been awarded. This year a $1500 scholarship was awarded to Sarah, a senior at Kings High School, to assist with her further education in jazz vocal music at Asuza Pacific University with the goal of having a career in the arts. Fiscal Impact Attachments No files) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:40 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 02:53 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 04:17 PM APRV Form Started By: Frances Started On: 06/13/2007 01:08 Chapin PM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 372 of 463 Packet Page 373 of 463 AM-1049 Tobacco Free Parks Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: Submitted By: 06/19/2007 Brian McIntosh Time: Department: Parks and Recreation Type: Review Committee: Community/Development Services Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Tobacco Free Parks Presentation. 10 Minutes Action 5. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Adoption of a "For Our Kids: Tobacco Free Parks" proclamation to include all City parks and trails with a kick-off event and celebration at 12:30 pm on July 31 st, 2007 at City Park. Previous Council Action The CS/DS Committee on June 12 directed staff to bring a resolution forward to the City Council for consideration on the regular agenda for June 19, 2007. Narrative Annie Peterson, Health Educator for the Snohomish County Health District, will present a brief overview of the program and be available for questions. In 2001 the Snohomish County Health District initiated a program to promote Tobacco Free Parks in communities throughout Snohomish County. Since that time, 13 communities and the County itself have adopted policies, resolutions, and proclamations to promote and encourage this idea. With the exception of the City of Mill Creek all of these communities have adopted policies calling for voluntary compliance. The Edmonds Police Department concurs with this voluntary approach. The health concerns regarding second-hand smoke are well -documented as are the environmental impacts worldwide from the billions of not biodegradable cigarette butts and related garbage (packaging, lighters, etc.). It is hoped that the reduction or elimination of smoking in the parks and beaches will reduce staff and volunteer maintenance time and enhance the aesthetic park experience. The campaign seeks to educate the local community about the harmful effects of second-hand smoke (SHS) and to provide a healthy environment for kids, families, and all park users. When kids see a park free of smokers they are more likely to recognize this as the norm. The Snohomish Health District has assisted in this effort by providing communities with examples of existing tobacco free parks policies, promoting the new policies by jointly writing press releases, designing and producing signage for parks, getting youth involved, and helping to plan a kick off celebration and ceremony. Packet Page 374 of 463 The Edmonds Planning Board unanimously endorses this commitment to Tobacco Free Parks and with City Council approval the Health District and the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department would begin planning now for a ceremony and proclamation in late July. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Tobacco Free Parks Draft Link: Tobacco Free Parks Sign Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox 1 Police 2 City Clerk 3 Mayor 4 Final Approval Form Started By: Brian McIntosh Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Approved By Date Status Al Compaan 06/14/2007 02:25 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 02:29 PM APRV Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:16 PM APRV Started On: 06/14/2007 08:34 AM Packet Page 375 of 463 For Our Kids• Tobacco -Free Parks Tuesday, July 31, 2007 WHEREAS, Secondhand tobacco smoke is known to contribute to hung cancer, cardiovascular disease, and emphysema in nonsmoking individuals; and WHEREAS, each year, due to exposure to secondhand smoke, an estimated 3,000 nonsmoking Americans die of lung cancer and 150,000 to 300,000 children suffer fr•oni. lower respiratory tract infections; and WHEREAS, each day over 4,000 young people aged 12- 17 begin smoking in the United States, the start to becoming lifelong smokers; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds operates many parks and outdoor events throughout the greater Edmonds area and, in that administrative capacity, encourages the use of each facility in a safe and healthy manner; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board and the Edmonds City Council recommend an educational campaign, in cooperation with the Snohomish County 1lealth District, requesting that park patrons not smoke or use tobacco products in parks, playgrounds, trails, and ballfields in coordination with the installation of "For the Kids -- Tobacco -Free Parks" signage. NOW, 7HEREF4RE, 1, Gary Haakenson, Mayor, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, July 31, 2007 as the kickoff date of the "FOR OUR KIDS - TOBACCO -FREE PARKS" education program in the City of Edmonds, and urge all citizens to join me in bringing awareness to this serious health issue, and in so doing, making our parks safer and healthier for our children and for everyone who enjoys the myriad of parks in our community. Gary Haakenson, Mayor July 31, 2007 Packet Page 376 of 463 ■ 0 PARKS 4MaMK YO U-10 i7l..HMTH �� AM-1035 Proposed Increase in Parking Infraction Fees Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: Submitted By: 06/19/2007 Gerry Gannon Time: Department: Police Department Type: Review Committee: Public Safety Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Information 30 Minutes Action Subject Title Public Hearing regarding a proposed increase in parking infraction fees. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance increasing the penalties for parking infractions. Previous Council Action 6. The parking infraction penalty was reviewed and accepted by the Public Safety Committee for the consent agenda. The item was removed from the consent agenda and moved to a public hearing on 6/ 19/07. Narrative As part of the parking survey that was accepted by Council on July 22, 2003, it was recommended in the survey that the parking penalties be increased for restricted parking. Research shows that the last increase of parking penalties was approximately ten years ago. The Downtown Parking Committee requested Officer Debbie Dawson to conduct a survey of other jurisdictions' penalties that have overtime parking regulations. Eight Washington cities were compared to the City of Edmonds in her survey. The attached document show the penalty ranges are for the eight surveyed cities. Officer Dawson was unable to compare Lynnwood or Mountlake Terrace in the survey because neither city has similar restricted time areas as the City of Edmonds. The recommendation from the Downtown Parking committee to Council is to follow Suggestion #1 on Officer Dawson's January 26, 2007, memo. This simply doubles the cost of the infractions. The committee also recommends that all fines other than restricted parking and handicap parking be increased to $40.00 with the half price incentive remaining part of the ordinance. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Officer Dawson Memo Link: Parking Infractions Ordinance Packet Page 378 of 463 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/12/2007 09:09 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/12/2007 10:20 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/12/2007 10:29 AM APRV Form Started By: Gerry Started On: 06/12/2007 08:05 Gannon AM Final Approval Date: 06/12/2007 Packet Page 379 of 463 .48.215 Parking infraction penalties. A. Any person who commits a parking infraction shall be assessed the following civil penalty, unless otherwise provided herein: 1. All parking infractions whether on public streets or within lots, except as detailed in subsections (A)(2) ) of this section: $2040.00; 2. Unauthorized handicapped zone parking: $250.00; 3. PaFki q AR fire Zene. $30 00/ B. All persons who have committed a parking infraction and are issued a notice of infraction for violations of parking infraction ordinances except those scheduled in subsections (A)(2) and (3) of this section shall be assessed a reduced fine of $ .00 for that violation if: 1. It is their first violation; and 2. The individual pays the penalty within 24 hours of the issuance of the notice of infraction. C. Repeat Violations Within One Calendar Year. 1. For persons who commit repeated parking violations within one calendar year, there shall be no opportunity for reduction and the penalty shall stand as stated in subsection (A) of this section regardless of when the penalty is paid; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit the court from imposing additional penalties and costs for late payment. 2. After the second violation, the penalty listed in subsection (A) of this section shall be increased to $40.00. After the T4:te third volation the penalty listed in subsection (A) of this section shall be increaser! to $80 and all subsequent violations with one calendar year shall pay a civil penalty equal to $80 160.00 per violation. 3 Each subsequent violatiion of a period of time constitutes another violation. 43. Any person who remains free of parking infractions for one calendar year shall revert to the base fine set forth in subsection (A) of this section to the end that, after a one-year period free of violation, the offense shall be considered a first offense and subject to reduction as provided above if paid within 24 hours. D. Any person who commits a parking infraction, and who fails to respond to the notice of that infraction within 15 days of its issuance, shall be assessed twice the civil penalty for such infraction as is set forth in subsections (A) and (B) of this section. Such penalty shall be in addition to any other penalties or fines imposed for failure to respond to a notice of parking infraction. E. "Person" as used in this section shall refer to the registered owner of the vehicle found to be in violation of the parking provisions of this chapter. [Ord. 3564 § 1, 2005]. Packet Page 380 of 463 Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM January 26, 2007 Assistant Chief of Police Gerald Gannon Senior Animal Control Officer Debbie Dawson Comparison ofParking Fines I was asked at the Downtown Parking Committee meeting on January 9, 2007 to research the parking fines in other jurisdictions. The attached document compares eight cities in Washington to the City of Edmonds. I heard at the meeting that the Committee wants to consider increasing the overtime parking fines. The following two fine structures are my suggestions. The first simply doubles the current fines and the second raises the current fines by $20. Current Suggestion #1 Suggestion #2 I"offense $10 $20 $20 2" d offense $20 $40 $40 3Td offense $40 $80 $60 4ch offense $80 $160 $100 I also suggest raising the base fine to $40 for all parking violations and keeping the `/z price incentive if the fine is paid within 24 hours. The Seattle ordinance about "each subsequent period of time constitutes another violation" could be another effective enforcement tool for Edmonds to consider. Many vehicles that are cited just sit for the rest of day without moving. Sincerely, Debbie Dawson Senior Animal Control Officer City of Edmonds Police Department Packet Page 381 of 463 Parking Fine Comparison Chart Bremerton Bellevue Olympia 1 st OT $25 All OT $20 1 st expired meter $12.50 2nd OT $32 (within 30 days) 2nd expired meter $15 3rd OT $56 (within 30 days) 3rd expired meter $30 Other parking fines from $10 to $56 Most parking fines $45 RCW's $35 Most fines $25 Seattle Everett Edmonds All OT $35 1 st, 2nd, 3rd OT $20 ** 1st OT $10 4th, 5th 6th OT $20 + $25, no reduction 2nd OT $20 7th OT $20 + $50, no reduction 3rd OT $40 4th OT $80 *" All fines $38 ** each subsequent period of ** reduced by 75% if paid within 24 hours All fines $20 are 1/2 price if paid time constitutes another within 24 hours violation *" fine stays at $80 until vehicle is violation free for 1 year Kirkland Vancouver Auburn 1 st OT $20 All OT $7 2nd OT $25 (within 60 days) 3rd OT $50 (within 60 days) 4th OT $100 (within 60 days) Other parking fines $20 All fines $25 Downtown employee parking prohibited $100 " " " " ,within one year $200 *** OT is for Overtime Prepared by Debbie Dawson, 4/12/2007 Packet Page 383 of 463 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 5/20/07 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 8.48.215 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES IN ORDER TO INCREASE PARKING FINES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, in order for fines to be meaningful and to cover the costs of enforcement, they must be reviewed and approved; and reviewed; and WHEREAS, it has been some time since the City's parking infractions have been WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the public interest and necessary for cost recovery to increase the cost of parking fines; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds City Code, Section 8.48.215 Parking infraction penalties is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.48.215 Parking infraction penalties. A. Any person who commits a parking infraction shall be assessed the following civil penalty, unless otherwise provided herein: I. All parking infractions whether on public streets or within lots, except as detailed in subsections (A)(2) of this section: $40.00; 2. Unauthorized handicapped zone parking:. $250.00; {WSS661253.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Page 384 of 463 B. All persons who have committed a parking infraction and are issued a notice of infraction for a violation of subsection A (1)of parking infraction ordinances shall be assessed a reduced fine of $20.00 for that violation i£ 1. It is their first violation; and 2. The individual pays the penalty within 24 hours of the issuance of the notice of infraction. C. Repeat Violations Within One Calendar Year. l . For persons who commit repeated parking violations within one calendar year, there shall be no opportunity for reduction and the penalty shall stand as stated in subsection (A) of this section regardless of when the penalty is paid; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit the court from imposing additional penalties and costs for late payment. 2. After the second violation, the penalty listed in subsection (A), with the exception of A (2) of this section, shall be to $40.00 with no reduction. After the third violation, the penalty listed in subsection (A) of this section shall be increased to $80 and all subsequent violations within one calendar year shall pay a civil penalty equal to $160.00 per violation. 3. Each subsequent violation of the posted period of parking time constitutes another violation. Calculation of the new period of parking time begins immediately after a notice of infraction has been issued. 4. Any person who remains free of parking infractions for one calendar year shall revert to the base fine set forth in subsection (A) of this section to the end that, after a one-year period free of violation, the offense shall be considered a first offense and subject to reduction as provided above if paid within 24 hours. D. Any person who commits a parking infraction, and who fails to respond to the notice of that infraction within 15 days of its issuance, shall be assessed twice the civil penalty for such infraction as is set forth in subsections (A) and (B) of this section. Such penalty shall be in addition to any other penalties or fines imposed for failure to respond to a notice of parking infraction. E. "Person" as used in this section shall refer to the registered owner of the vehicle found to be in violation of the parking provisions of this chapter. {WSS661253.DOC;1/00006.900000/} -2- Packet Page 385 of 463 Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS661253.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 386 of 463 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 8.48.215 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES IN ORDER TO INCREASE PARKING FINES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 92007. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS661253.DOC;1/00006.900000/1- 4 - Packet Page 387 of 463 AM-1036 7. Review Draft City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Duane Bowman Time: 20 Minutes Department: Development Services Type: Review Committee: Community/Development Services Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Presentation on Draft City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Motion to authorize that the draft Commute Trip Reduction Plan be forwarded to the Puget Sound Regional Council for review. Previous Council Action The CS/DS Committee reviewed the draft plan Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) plan at the June 12, 2007 committee meeting and recommended the plan be forwarded to the full Council for review. Narrative In 2006, the Washington State Legislature passed the Commute Trip Reduction Efficiency Act which amended the CTR requirements for local governments in counties experiencing the greatest automobile -related pollution and traffic congestion. The purpose for the amendments was to require the local governments to develop and implement plans to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips. Each city received a small amount of dollars from the state to do this update. All the cities in Snohomish County pooled their dollars together and are having the County do a boiler plate CTR plan that each jurisdiction can use. Snohomish County contracted with Perteet, Inc. to prepare the draft plans. Working with the various cities, the consultant prepared the draft plans. These CTR plans have to be approved by the local government and submitted to the Puget Sound Regional Council and eventually by next year be adopted by ordinance. The draft plan (Exhibit 1) focuses on reducing drive alone trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) among employees who work for major employers. In Edmonds there are three employers who are considered major employers (Stevens Hospital, City of Edmonds and Edmonds Family Medical Clinic). The plan has set a goal of reducing drive alone trips by 10% and VMT by 13% for major employers by 2011. Jonathan Dong, of Perteet, Inc., will make a presentation on the draft plan to the City Council and be available for questions. Fiscal Impact Packet Page 388 of 463 Link: Exhibit 1 - Draft CTR Plan A*fnr hmnnfc Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 08:19 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 09:22 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 09:26 AM APRV Form Started By: Duane Started On: 06/12/2007 01:08 Bowman PM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 389 of 463 Draft City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan June 2007 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................1 I. BASELINE ASSESSMENT................................................................................... 4 II. AND III. BASELINE AND GOALS FOR 2011....................................................11 IV. STRATEGIES FOR ACHIEVING GOALS AND TARGETS..............................12 V. REQUIREMENTS FOR MAJOR EMPLOYERS.................................................17 VI. FINANCIAL PLAN............................................................................................ 20 Vll. IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURE ..................... Vlll. DOCUMENTATION OF CONSULTATION..................................................... 25 List of Appendices Appendix A: City of Edmonds Vicinity Map of CTR Worksites Appendix B: City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Map Appendix C: City of Edmonds Zoning Map Appendix D: City of Edmonds Transit Services and Facilities Map Appendix E: City of Edmonds Non -Motorized Facilities Map Appendix F: Commute Trip Reduction Workshop Summary Appendix G: Summary of Policies that Support CTR Appendix H: Glossary of Terms City of Edmonds i Commute Trip Reduction Plan ,tune 2007 Packet Page 391 of 463 INTRODUCTION In 1993, the City of Edmonds adopted the Commute Trip Reduction Ordinance (EMC 17.95). The purpose of this ordinance was to comply wfth the Commute Trip Reduction Act RCW 70.94.521 adopted by the Washington State Legislature in 1991. This law requires employers of 100 or more employees who arrive between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. to develop and implement a program to encourage their employees to reduce vehicle miles traveled and single occupant vehicle trips. In 1997, the CTR Ordinance was later amended to revise the CTR goals. In 2006, the Washington State Legislature passed the Commute Trip Reduction Efficiency Act which amended the requirements for local governments in those counties experiencing the greatest automobile -related air pollution and traffic congestion to develop and implement plans to reduce single -occupant vehicle trips. This plan has been prepared in accordance with these revisions to RCW 70.94.521. The Commute Trip Reduction Plan is a collection of City -adopted goals and policies, facility and service improvements, and marketing and financial strategies that will Delp the City make progress toward reducing drive alone trips and vehicle miles traveled over the next four years. Building upon the success of the existing commute trip reduction program, the City strives to meet the goals of the plan for the future by working in partnership and coordination with other agencies and employers. The CTR Plan focuses on reducing drive alone trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) among employees that work for major employers. The City has set a goal of reducing drive alone trips by 10% and VMT by 13% for all major employers by 2011. To achieve the goals, the City has identified the following set of strategies: • Follow the County's goal of encouraging employers to locate in city centers. • Improve system for notification and enforcement of CTR law. • Develop programs for marketing and education of CTR. • Develop ETC training programs and guidelines. • Amend Comprehensive Plan to include CTR Efficiency Act. • Work with Community Transit to provide transit service to CTR-affected work sites. • Increase number of vanpools at CTR-affected work sites. • Work with CTR-affected work sites to provide bicycling and walking amenities. • Evaluate the feasibility of a car sharing service. • Work with employers to allow employees to work alternative schedules, when appropriate, such as a telework program and/or compressed work week program. • Provide guaranteed ride home program. • Offer assistance to employers to implement programs. • Increase management support for CTR program. • Work with CTR-affected work sites to offer incentives. • Evaluate the feasibility of a parking cashout program. • Conduct transit fairs at CTR-affected work sites. • Increase networking opportunities among major employers. City of Edmonds 1 April 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 392 of 463 Current CTR-affected work sites include the following: Work Site Address Edmonds City Hall 121 5t" Avenue N Stevens Hospital 21601 761h Avenue W Edmonds Family Medicine Clinic 7315 212th Street W This proposed Plan has been developed through extensive involvement by employers, transit agencies, organizations and individuals from throughout the City who helped identify strategies and ways for successful achievement of the goals. This plan helps to support the achievement of the City's vision -and the goals of its comprehensive plan. Benefits of the CTR Program to the City of Edmonds Although the Commute Trip Reduction Program only applies to a few sites in the City of Edmonds, the CTR program will continue to grow and address a variety of transportation and environmental issues. Several trends are increasing the value of CTR in Edmonds, particularly as an alternative to expanding roads and parking facilities. Those trends include: • Rising facility costs. The cost of expanding highways and parking facilities is increasing. In many cases it is more cost effective to manage demand than to continue expanding supply. If the CTR program is successful, it will help reduce the demand on state, regional and local streets. This in turn helps to reduce the need to expand the roadway system. • Demographics. As the population becomes older and more mature, it will become more important to increase the availability of quality travel options for non -drivers. Senior citizens will be more dependent on transit and non -motorized travel options. • Energy Costs. Vehicle fuel costs have risen dramatically and are projected to increase in the future due to depletion of oil supplies and environmental constraints. Rising costs have increased the demand for non -drive alone travel alternatives. The vanpool market, in particular, has exceeded demand and there are currently waiting lists for available vanpools. • Consumer preferences and market trends. CTR is addressing current consumer preferences in which more consumers want to live in more multi -modal communities where it is possible to walk and bicycle safely, use neighborhood services, and have access to quality public transportation. • Environmental concerns. CTR helps to address concerns over air pollution, sprawl and other environmental impacts by reducing the demand for automobiles. Automobiles comprise 55% of air pollutants. For each car that is taken off the road, there is a significant benefit to the environment. City of Edmonds 2 April 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 393 of 463 In summary, the CTR program is a cost-effective program that addresses a number of issues in Edmonds. Although CTR has been applied to only a few work sites, the program will continue to grow and expand as solutions are needed to complex transportation and environmental issues. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 3 April 2007 Packet Page 394 of 463 1. BASELINE ASSESSMENT -Affected C7R Work. Saps The CTR plan focuses on reducing drive alone trips and vehicle miles traveled at CTR-affected work sites. A CTR-affected work site is a site that contains 100 or more employees that arrive at the site between 6 and 9 a.m. lender the CTR ordinance, there are three affected work sites in the City of Edmonds. Those work sites include the following: Work Site Address Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N Stevens Hospital 21601 76th Avenue W Edmonds Family Medicine Clinic 7315 212th Street W The attached map of the jurisdiction shows the locations of the CTR work sites (see Appendix A). Mator Issues Regarding Land Use and TrahsOrfat an Conditioriis"Around CTR,Work Sites The City of Edmonds conducted a review of land use and transportation conditions at each of its CTR-affected work sites. Described below are the existing and planned conditions for the work sites. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 4 April 2007 Packet Page 395 of 463 Edmonds City Hall -121 St" Avenue N, Edmonds, WA Existing and planned land use conditions: Edmonds City Hall is located in Downtown Edmonds, where land uses include retail, office and residential development. This area is zoned as Community Business. No land use changes are planned for this area. The downtown area is proposed in the comprehensive plan as "Fountain Square" and as a downtown area with mixed commercial. Existing and planned transportation The work site is served by a number of excellent facilities: transportation facilities, including sidewalks, a street network, and access to transit and ferry services. Edmonds Way, a major arterial, and 5th Ave South, a secondary arterial both lead into the city hall area from the south. In addition, Main Street leads into the downtown area from Hwy 99. Non -motorized improvements are planned for 5th Street and Main Street. There are plans to improve downtown arking as well. Existing and planned transit services and The site is served by a number of routes operated by facilities: Community Transit. Community Transit buses serve downtown Edmonds via two commuter routes and one local route. There is a Sounder Commuter rail station in downtown also. The Washington State Ferry system has a dock in Edmonds that serves Kingston. A transit center and park and ride lot is located nearby to the work site. In addition to transit services, Community Transit also offers vanpool and ride matching services. Existing parking conditions: Parking is free for employees and visitors and there are no apparent ca acity constraints at this work site. City of Edmonds 5 April 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 396 of 463 V' Avenue and Edmonds City Hail. Lie on street parking. City''A Edmonds Edmonds E>Ity Hall . ID Number: E40386 Total Number of Employees: 207 Affected CTR Employees: 110 2011 Drive Alone Goal: 75% 2011 VMTIEmployee Goal: 8 miles/day Services Available: Park and Ride Lot Routes: Parking: Free On -Site Recommended CTR Strategies: Vanpool services, telework program; carpool program City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 397 of 463 6 April 2007 I Stevens Hospital - 21601 76th Avenue W and Edmonds Family Medicine Clinic - 7315 212th Street W Existing and planned land use conditions: These worksites are located in the SR 99 activity corridor and in an area zoned for Medical Use and surrounded by General Commercial and Multi -Family uses. The surrounding area includes medical offices, small businesses and auto -oriented uses. The Comprehensive Plan proposes the same uses; however, there are plans to create a hospital community and family retail center in the area of Stevens Hospital. In addition, there are plans to improve connectivity for pedestrians between SR-99 and the neighborhoods to the west. There are also plans to improve buffering between SR-99 and multi- family and mixed use neighborhoods and the single family neighborhoods. Existing and planned transportation The work sites are served by a well developed street facilities: network. SR 99 is located nearby. Sidewalks exist on major arterials. A bikeway route exists on SR 99. The hospital is two blocks from Hwy 99, bounded by 212th Street, 220th Street, 76th Ave West, and 66th Ave West. There are plans to improve non -motorized transportation facilities such as the Interurban Trail and to implement safety improvements on SR 991 76th Ave W. Existing and planned transit services and There is access via SR-99 to Sound Transit bus facilities: service. In addition to transit services, Community Transit offers vanpool and ride matching services. The Edmonds park and ride lot is located near the work sites. The City has planned improvements for SR 99 which include widening the corridor to accommodate a transit lane. Bus Rapid Transit service is planned for the SR 99 corridor. The city also plans to provide interconnected development, develop mixed use area served by transit and accessible to pedestrians, and improve pedestrian and bicyclist access. Existing parking conditions: Parking is free for employees and visitors and there are no apparent capacity constraints at this work site. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 7 April 2007 Packet Page 398 of 463 Stevens Hospital Main Building. 76' Avenue. Bus Stop. Bus Stop. ID Number: E40394 Total Number of Employees: 467 Affected CTR Employees: 250 2011 Drive Alone Goal: 69% 2011 VMT/Employee Goal: 8.3 miles/day Services Available: Park and Ride Lot Routes: 110, 404, 405, 406, 441, 810, 870,871 Parking: Free On -Site Recommended CTR Strategies: Vanpooi services, carpool program; transit subsidies City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 8 April 2007 Packet Page 399 of 463 Edmonds Family Medicine Clinic Main Building. On street parking. Bus stop. City of,Edinonds Edmonds'Fam�l Medlcie Clinic ID Number: E44218 Total Number of Employees: TBD Affected CTR Employees: TBD 2011 Drive Alone Goal: TBD 2011 VMT/Employee Goal: TBD Services Available: Park and Ride Lot Routes: 110,130, 170 Parking: Free On -Site Recommended CTR Strategies: Vanpool services, transit subsidies, carpool program City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 9 April 2007 Packet Page 400 of 463 Supporting ;Comprehensive Plan Policies The City conducted a review of its current Comprehensive Plan to identify policies that support the Commute Trip Reduction program. The most current version of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan was adopted in December 2006. The most current version of the City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2001. The most current version of the City of Edmonds Transportation Element was adopted in 2002. Key policies that support CTR include the City's goals for its Downtown Waterfront Activity Center. The plans to implement the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center at Point Edwards which will provide convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians, and bicycle riders. The City's policies also support pedestrian -oriented streetscape environment for residential and commercial activity. it also encouraged mixed -use development patterns that provide a variety of commercial and residential opportunities, including both multi -family and small lot single family residences. The City's Transportation Plan includes Transportation Demand Management strategies. These strategies include offering transit service, carpool and vanpool ridematching services, walkways and bikeways, and high occupancy vehicle lanes. Suppartmg 1 ransit'Plan °Policies Community Transit is currently updating its Transit Development Plan for 2007-2012. The Plan wil include a discussion of regional growth, transportation demand, and the role of transit in maintaining concurrency (adequate capacity to serve demand). A key element of the plan will consist of maps identifying "transit emphasis corridors" where Community Transit supports a substantial future investment in public transit service and amenities. The goal in identifying all the corridors (both existing and future) is twofold, to help focus service planning and prioritization for Community Transit and to provide some surety of planning for road authorities and local jurisdictions. In many cases (SR-99, 164th Street SW,1-5, etc), the corridors are already well -served by high - frequency transit service. Many CTR-affected work sites are located on these corridors. Other. corridors, such as SR-9 or 128th Street SW, may have lower or no existing service, but are identified as critical transportation links with significant future transit demand. City of Edmonds 10 April 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 401 of 463 II. and III. BASELINE AND GOALS FOR 2011 The goal of the Edmonds CTR plan is to reduce drive alone trips by 10% and vehicle miles traveled by 13% at CTR-affected work sites. The base rates have been determined using the most recent CTR survey data. At the time that this plan was prepared, survey data from 2005 was used to prepare the base rates. The overall goals and target rates for Edmonds have been calculated by aggregating the CTR work sites in Edmonds. The tables below show the base rate, goal and target rates. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 402 of 463 11 April 2007 The City of Edmonds performed an assessment of different strategies that could be implemented that would help eliminate barriers for reducing drive alone trips and vehicle miles traveled. The following potential actions were identified as strategies that will help the City achieve its 2011 goal. • Transit: Transit ridership among CTR-affected work sites is low, the City will continue to work with Community Transit to increase transit ridership at CTR-affected work sites by increasing awareness of transit services and working with employers to offer transit subsidies. Community Transit is preparing an update to its Six -Year Transit Development Plan. A key element of the plan will consist of "transit emphasis corridors" where Community Transit supports a substantial future investment in public transit service and amenities. Many of the CTR-affected work sites are located along these corridors. Transit services will be improved within the county. Community Transit is planning for Bus -Rapid Transit along Highway 99. This bus service could potentially help reduce commute trips for employers that are located near the SR 99 corridor such as B/K Entertainment. Community transit plans to add more bus shelters and replace Metro Rt. 317 service between Edmonds and Aurora Village transit center. • Parking: To increase the percentage of commuters using transit, vanpool, carpool and non - motorized forms of transportation, the City will work with CTR employers to implement a parking management program, such as parking cashout and employee paid parking. The County will also implement its Comprehensive Plan policies on parking management. The City will review the development code for parking requirements that discourage single -occupancy vehicle use.. • Local Networking Opportunities: To increase opportunities for ridesharing and creating partnerships between employers, the City will create local networking opportunities for affected employers. Local networking with other CTR-affected employers will offer City of Edmonds 12 April 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 403 of 463 opportunities to discuss CTR and transportation issues, conduct joint promotions, and offer coordinated programs that can benefit their employees. • Land Use The City will implement its current land use policies that encourage the development of Centers. Employers will be encouraged to locate in the Centers where higher levels of services, such as transit, non -motorized and TDM programs are offered. Higher densities will be allowed which will help increase transit and ridesharing activities. 0 Employer Assistance To Delp CTR-affected work sites achieve their goals, the City and Community Transit will continue to provide assistance to employers with implementing their programs. Community Transit will help promote CTR programs at work sites through transit fairs and preparing public information materials. Management Support and ETC training The City will work with major employers and business organizations to increase support for CTR programs. It will also develop guidelines for Employee Transportation Coordinators and provide training to help them implement their programs. City of Edmonds 13 Apri[ 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 404 of 463 Based on the feasibility of implementing various strategies, the following strategies are planned that will help the CTR-affected work sites make progress towards their 2011 goal. These strategies will be performed in coordination with other Snohomish County cities, Community Transit, Everett Transit and other partners. In the City of Edmonds, future growth in population and employment are targeted to designated centers where increased use of transit, parking. management, bicycling, and walking can be Implement Concept of Centers j supported. This program would improve the system of requiring new CTR affected employers and Employer Notification and existing CTR affected employers to notify their Enforcement jurisdiction about program changes. Employer Transportation Coordinators (ETCs) are essential for a successful CTR program. Their job duties should include coordination of annual fairs, conducting promotions, distributing information, notifying the jurisdiction about program changes, and reporting employee numbers. Guidelines and training should be provided to ETCs to assist them with their duties. Employers should provide them ETC Training and Guidelines with the time and support to be successful. Review tea The City will review the development code for parking requirements that discourage single - Policies occupancy vehicle use. Amend Comprehensive Plan to include language about the CTR Efficiencv Act Transit Services City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan The City should review its Comprehensive Plan and add new policies to correspond with its CTR clan, if necessarv. Community Transit will continue to provide transit services to CTR work sites, where service is currently available. Community Transit will make service enhancements based on its updated Six - 14 April 2007 Packet Page 405 of 463 Year Transit Development Plan. Among the planned improvements, Community Transit is planning for a Bus -Rapid Transit Corridor that will link major urban centers and provide additional vanpools across the county, as needed. Community Transit will target adding 25 new vans Vanpool Services county -wide in 2008. The City and Community Transit will continue to encourage carpooling and use of p g www.rideshareonfine.com or Community Transit Carpool Services staff to assist in carpool matching services. The City will work with major employers to encourage the provision of amenities such as bike lockers, access to shower facilities and changing facilities to increase usage of non -motorized Bicycling and Walking Amenities transportation. The City will work to create a telework education program that would educate employers on how to implement telework at their work site, if applicable. The program includes education on human resource policies and information technology Telework Program assistance to allow emolovees to work from home. The City will evaluate the market for a car sharing Car Sharing Service service, such as Flexcar, near CTR sites. The City will work with employers to encourage them to otter alternative and flexible work schedules for their employees, including Alternative and Flexible Schedules compressed work weeks. This program will provide a limited number of rides to non -drive alone participants from their work site Guaranteed Ride Home to their home in the case of an emergency. The City will coordinate with Community Transit to provide assistance to affected employers to help them meet the requirements of the CTR Efficiency Emplover Assistance ACT and implement their oroarams. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan The City and Community Transit will work with CTR worksite managers and owners to educate them about the benefits of CTR to their organizations. 95 April 2007 Packet Page 406 of 463 The City will encourage employers to offer subsidy programs to persuade employees to shift to non - drive alone commute modes. Examples include six -months of free vanpool participation, transit pass subsidies, and a one-time payment or gift Subsidies card for starting a carpool. Employers are encouraged to charge employees for parking or allow their employees to receive cash for their parking spot if they choose to not use their parking space, which could be used Parkin Management toward transit costs or vanpool costs. This program would expand education efforts to CTR employees about alternative commuting including workshops, information brochures, and Marketing and Education advertising. The City will work with Community Transit and major employers to conduct on site promotions, transportation fairs, and challenges to increase Transportation Fairs awareness and use of commute alternatives. The City and Community Transit will work with the major employers to create networking opportunities to discuss CTR issues, coordinate ddesharing programs, and conduct joint Networking Opportunities promotional efforts. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 96 April 2007 Packet Page 407 of 463 V. REQUIREMENTS FOR MAJOR EMPLOYERS Employers that are affected by the CTR Law will be required to implement the following program elements: Requited �- The Employee Transportation Coordinator is the point of contact Designate Employee between the employer and its workforce to implement, promote and Transportation administer the organization's CTR program. He/she is also the point of Coordinator contact between the employer and the local jurisdiction to track the employer's progress in meeting CTR requirements Affected employers will be responsible for providing adequate training for the ETC, allow the ETC to attend networking meetings, and provide ETCs with the necessary time to administer the program. Information about commute alternatives will be distributed at least Regular Distribution of twice a year to employees. Examples of information that will be Information to distributed will include: Employees • Description of the employer's commute options program Transit system maps and schedules • Vanpool rider alerts • Weekly traffic alerts • Wheel Options campaign promotional materials CTR Reporting The employer is required to complete the Employer Report and Program Description Form and submit to the local jurisdiction. The CTR law requires that the employer shall conduct a program evaluation to determine worksite progress toward meeting the CTR goals every two years. However, the jurisdiction may have a more stringent requirement. CTR Survey Biennially, the CTR affected employers shall distribute and collect Commute Trip Reduction Program Employee Questionnaires (surveys) to achieve at least a 70 ercent response rate. Implementation of a Set The employer is required to implement a set of measures that are of Measures designed to increase the percentage of employees using some or all of the following modes: • Transit • Vanpool • Carpool • Bic cle or walking City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 17 Ap612007 Packet Page 408 of 463 • Telework, Compressed Work Week, or Flexible Work Schedule • Other non -single occupant vehicle modes Measures to reduce drive alone trips and vehicle miles traveled include, but are not limited to: • Provision of preferential parking or reduced parking charges for high occupancy vehicles • Instituting or increasing parking charges for single - occupant vehicles • Provision of commuter ride matching services • Provision of subsidies for transit fares • Provisions of vans for vanpools • Provisions of subsidies for carpooling or vanpooling • Permitting the use of the employer's vehicles for carpooling or vanpooling • Permitting flexible work schedules • Cooperation with transportation providers to provide additional regular or express service to the worksite • Construction of special loading and unloading facilities for transit, carpool, and vanpool users Provision of bicycle parking facilities, lockers, changing areas, and showers • Provision of a program for parking incentives such as a rebate for employees who do not use the parking facility • Establishment of a program to permit employees to work part or full time at home or at an alternative worksite closer to their homes • Establishment of a program of alternative work schedules such as compressed work week schedules (such as 4/40 or 9/80) Implementation of other measures designed to facilitate the use of high -occupancy vehicles such as on -site day care facilities and emergency taxi services Employers or owners of worksites may form or utilize an existing transportation management association or other transportation -related associations by RCS 35.87A.030 to assist members in developing and implementing commute trip reduction programs City of Edmonds 18 April 2007 Commute Trip. Reduction Plan Packet Page 409 of 463 y�• 1 s ETC Training ETCs shall be required to attend an ETC training session. Training sessions may include marketing CTR programs to employees, trip planning, and ride matching services. Employer Notification Employers shall be required to notify the City when there are proposed changes to their CTR program, changes in ETC, and/or changes in number of emplo ees at the work site. ETC Networking At least once per year, ETCs shall be required to attend networking opportunities with other ETCs to discuss CTR issues, ridesharing coordination, joint promotions, etc. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 19 April 2007 Packet Page 410 of 463 VI. FINANCIAL PLAN The City of Edmonds has entered into an inter -local agreement to work with other Snohomish County Cities to implement the CTR program. The following financial plan has been jointly prepared for the cities of Arlington, Monroe., Marysville, Lynnwood, Bothell, Mountlake Terrace, Mukilteo, Unincorporated Snohomish County and Edmonds. Fundin Sources 9 The CTR programs administered in Snohomish County are funded by a number of sources, as described in the following table. City of Edmonds 20 Ap612007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 411 of 463 Program Expenses The cost of implementing CTR is shared primarily by the City, the transit agency, and the employers. The following is a summary of the types of expenses incurred throughout Snohomish County. Prepare local CTR All CTR-Affected $160,000 $160,000 $160,000 $160,000 plan, Snohomish County Comprehensive Jurisdictions Plan, and CTR ordinance Employer Community Transit $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Notification Administer CTR Community Transit $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 program (contract management, annual reporting, program review, surveys, coordination meetings Promotions and Community Transit $125,000 $ 125,000 $125,000 $125,000 Marketing Guaranteed Ride Community Transit $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Home Program Implement Community Transit $1,293,000 $1,293,000 $1,293,000 $1,293,000 supporting transit services Implement Community $ 790,000 $ 790,000 $ 790,000 $ 790,000 supporting vanpool Transit, Cities, services County Bike to Work Community Transit $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Campaign Offer program Cities, County, $ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ 46,000 incentives Community Transit, Employer TOTAL $2,362,000 $2,362,000 $2,362,000 $2,362,000 City of Edmonds Commute Tdp Reduction Plan 21 April Packet Page 412 of 463 Financial Gaps The following table summarizes program areas that are not currently funded. However, some potential funding sources have been identified for the applicable organization to target. -. trategT- 1 Develop Chief Executive Increase management $ 50,000 Management Officers, support for CTR program Support program by giving employer managers recognition and describing benefits of program to CEOs ETC Training and ETCs Training specifically $ 50,000 Guidelines tailored to ETCs to help improve their job performance. Transit, vanpool Commuters at Subsidies to encourage $ 500,000 and carpool CTR-affected commuters to shift to subsidies work sites transit, vanpool and carpools TOTAL $600,000 The following table shows the amount of money necessary to implement all of the proposed strategies listed in the previous tables. There are insufficient funds at this time; however, some potential funding sources were identified in the previous table for the jurisdiction or transit agency to target. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 22 April 2007 Packet Page 413 of 463 VII. IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURE The City of Edmonds plans to work in partnership with Community Transit and its affected work sites to implement the CTR program. Community Transit will be under contract by the City to perform various services to assist affected employers implement their CTR programs. • .. . "- r. City of Edmonds The City of Edmonds will be responsible for developing and implementing their local CTR plans. They are responsible for ensuring that CTR plans are consistent with their local comprehensive plans. As part of their CTR plans, local jurisdictions will set the goals and targets for the affected employers. For CTR program administration, local jurisdictions will work with. Community Transit to ensure that affected employers are in compliance with the CTR law. The City will contract with Community Transit for employer outreach, program review and annual reporting of employer progress Community Transit Under contract with the City, Community Transit will be responsible for employer outreach, program review, and administering the employer survey process. Major Employers Employers that are affected under the CTR law are responsible for notifying the City when they are affected. Employers are responsible for implementing their CTR program requirements, including information distribution, designating an ETC, submitting program reports, and im lementin rogram elements. City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan 23 April 2007 Packet Page 414 of 463 CTR'Prograrn Aciivitues City of Edmonds Commute Trip Reduction Plan Packet Page 415 of 463 24 April 2007 VIII. DOCUMENTATION OF CONSULTATION The City of Edmonds' CTR Plan was developed in consultation with the following organizations: • Snohomish County • City of Mukilteo • City of Lynnwood • City of Arlington • City of Monroe • City of Everett • City of Bothell • City of Mountlake Terrace • City of Edmonds • Community Transit The dates of the consultations with these jurisdictions occurred on: • May 4, 2006 • August 9, 2006 • October 25, 2006 • November 29, 2006 • February 14, 2007 • March 23, 2007 During these consultations, the following issues were discussed the goals of the CTR Plan: CTR strategies, a financing plan, an implementation plan, and coordination of CTR services. In addition, meetings were held with representatives of the Puget Sound Regional Council to discuss the same issues on May 4, 2006, October 25, 2006, and November 29, 2006. . On January 23, 2007 and January 30, 2007, CTR Employer Workshops were held for all Snohomish County jurisdictions. The first event was held in Everett and the second event was held in Bothell. During these workshops, employer requirements to comply with the CTR law and CTR strategies were discussed. On January 30, 2007, a meeting was held with Transportation Choices Coalition, a local interest group, to discuss CTR strategies as well. On February 7, 2007, a meeting with the Snohomish County Public Health Department was held to discuss joint grant opportunities. City of Edmonds 25 April 2007 Commute Trip Reduction Plan 'i Packet Page 416 of 463 APPENDICES Packet Page 417 of 463 Appendix A CITY OF EDMONDS VICINITY CTR WORKSITE PLANS Packet Page 418 of 463 Legend - Existing Freeway - Existing Principal - Existing Minor ----- Existing Collector Recommended Principal Recommended Minor ReCOmmerded Collector Acute CTR Worksites f t .._- F w x _ _ � �5•ul i ¢�.-_ 188 m E � _ igsrts'S�,e _71 City a Edmonds a z .. MAINST ' c m _ Edjr oqd Family Idle trine Cil c —— LU IJ Q: O - HR _ - [ a 5 D D - o.. --.__.---- .. _. 238TH ST5IM City of Edmonds i Edmonds and Vicinity CTR Worksites Perl O 2,000 4,000 February 21, 2007 Peet Figure A Packet Page 419 of 463 Appendix B CITY OF EDMONDS . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Packet Page 420 of 463 City of Edmonds Edmonds and Vicinity CTR Worksites ' Comprehensive Plan Perteet Source Map date: March 15, 2005 February 20, 2007 Figure B Packet Page 421 of 463 Appendix C CITY OF EDMONDS ZONING MAP City of Edmonds Edmonds and Vicinity CTR Worksites 2006 Zoning Map Pei feet Source Map date: January 12, 2006 February 20, 2Q07 Figure C Packet Page 423 of 463 Appendix E CITY OF EDMONDS NON -MOTORIZED FACILITIES Packet Page 425 of 463 Legend EXISTING Sidewalk on One side of Road Sidewalk on Both sides of Road PROPOSED Sidewalk an One side of Road Sidewalk on Both sides of Road UNPAVEb WALKWAY 180n S�8w' v _.z ,,Or- ED%" V.� City of Edmonds Walkway Inventory 2002 Source_ City of Edmonds ihi—p's inccni6�l W[Plnnning ryvrygyes pJya�:i is nut =guamnimS in show acnvisae iru`assircvnenis. While rare liar bren September 2002 m name lbe aaznnc.• ntthc intorn�arion >lwu•n im �i� pag , ehe City of Fxhnnnde iuwmr �m re<yvnfiibi3iry hrc emm or f G.Iago onivwisthaimay bef d. Figure b City of Edmonds Edmonds and Vicinity CTR Worksites Pedestrian Facilities (September 2002) February 20, 2007 Figure E2 CITY OF EDMONDS BIKEWAY PLAN 2000 LEGEND Bikeway to he Signed (2000.2003) ,...,., Sikewayto be Signed (200942006) Bikeway -Adjacent Municipality 3nm.... Large Bikeway Projects .nrw w Lower Rated Routes Public Facililles!Schools a� Route Identifier G Existing BicycleParking Proposed Bicycle Parking �? SCALE. 1INCH--1000FEET _ .M .,»gym City of Edmonds Edmonds and Vicinity CTR Worksites Bikeway Plan PE'f E'<Eat (Comp Plan 2000) February 20, 2007 Figure E3 Packet Page 428 of 463 Appendix F COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION WORKSHOP SUMMARY Packet Page 429 of 463 Meeting Minutes -- North County Employer Workshop Everett Transit Center January 23, 2007 What are the benefits of the CTR program to your company? • Happier employees • Closer parking for employees if they participate • Retaining employees • Good options for employee commuting • Reduced parking costs What is working well? • Employees like the incentives • Free jeans day • Materials i.e. Wheel Options • CTR helps to hire and retain people What is not working well? • Bus service is not conducive (bus subsidies don't work well) Night shift is a problem • No rapid transit • Can't get to the work site by bus What are some suggestions to improve the program? • Offer $501month for 6 months for vanpool riders • Offer a one month free bus pass • Offer a commuter club program • Implement a tax that can be used for CTR What are some ideas for Canyon Park? • Improve sidewalks for pedestrian safety • Offer more frequent bus service • Encourage residents to walk to work • Focus on increasing carpools and telework What tools would ETCS find helpful? • Coordination with other companies • Vanpool lists • Brown bag lunches to coordinate rides • Training for rideshare on-line • More educational materials • Need web site to show span of bus service • Need list of vanpools serving Bothell area Packet Page 430 of 463 Suggestions? Re -write the CTR Ordinance(10% reduction in 4 years) What are the benefits of CTR program at your workplace? • More parking • Many carpools - commuters from farther distance • Different workshifts - carpools as opposed to transit Vanpool - co-workers become friends • Save time and money • Depends on how big the organization is • Honor employees who participate - newsletter, carpool parking (consideration to employee needs and what they feel they are losing by not driving alone) • Need community awareness (outside company) - more marketing • Internal matching system (online) How do you get management support regarding incentives? • - Quarterly drawings for MC gift cards • °Carpooler of the Quarter" closer to the door • Inter -county competition (you don't want to be the employerwho offers the lowest) • Paid parking • CT ($45 for any mode) How do you sell it to management? • Employee attendance • Show them studies • It's a benefit - as bargaining • Cost/benefit analysis report due to budget planning • RCW incentives and requirements • Recruitment benefit - employee satisfaction • Potential tax (pre-tax commuter benefits) • Show what other companies are doing How would you use the money? • Subsidies and prizes • Once started, employers will want to keep program • County should provide the information • Monthly drawings/quarterly drawings o Put it in a newsletter o 4100 a year- big impact • Referral program and incentives • Subsidies to help recruit in a tight job market • 'Need more information for management Packet Page 431 of 463 o Build a case in how CTR is beneficial to sell program to management What are the challenges and difficulties? • Subsidizing transit (Arlington — from Mt. Vernon, from Everett) for more routes o When do companies have a shift change • Everett Transit -- start shift at 5:30 am and 1 mile away from bus stop, but no service available that early • Walkers/bicyclists — during promotions want to go to lunch at home • Manufacturing — very early and later in the afternoon — transit and up north • Have CTR in the HR department but many HR departments do not have time (for example: in the City) • Management support in allowing time for ETC's to be able to do theirjob o State support grants o *letters from state and jurisdiction to president of company or other management o Offer incentives to companies that meet goals or benchmarks • CTR coordinators be kept continually informed o Regular meetings that draw in managers • *Charts and graphics that show CTR benefits to their company (i.e., increase in commuters from year to year) that ETC's can fill in and show their management • Get managers aware of program - engage them • Have jurisdiction go to: o Chamber of commerce meetings o Make personal appearance to CEOs o Not get them with a letter o Go to City Council meetings • Awareness of TRPP grants and application process • Need new ideas to increase participation o Communication exchange o Newsletter for all ETC's o Annual reports • Are gatherings helpful? Yes, but little time o CT plans network meetings every other month on specific topics • Hospitals • Manufacturing • Neighboring employers also o Vanpools • *List ETCs in an area o Send to ETCs and put them in contact with each other • Meetings — carpool to workshops to generate further discussion Packet Page 432 of 463 Meeting Minutes — South County Employer Workshop Bothell Seattle Times Building Bothell Employers January 30, 2007 What is the primary form of transit (non-SOV travel) used by employees in your organization? • Carpool • Vanpool • Transit • Bike, walk What are some suggestions from Bothell Employers to CT? • Distribute a list of vanpools from CT that includes the list of stops by neighborhood and city. • Provide training for hitp:l/www.rideshareonline.com/ • Provide monthly reoccurring training so that if you can't make it you know that it will be offered again soon. • Provide a web blog for ETCs, like the free http:l/www.blogger.comistart • Melina needs help finding out how to set up carpooling and vanpooling. • Need a more user friendly and local based site than http://www.rideshareonline.com/ • Try to coordinate ETCs from the same office park so they can coordinate carpools and vanpools together. • Share ETC information between ETCs regionally • A proposed shuttle from the CP P&R to Canyon Park sparked interested with some of the employers • Try to use principles of Redmond's R-Trip Program • Have brownbag lunches for training and information sharing • Need better coordination between CT and ST • Training on how to implement telework (costs, technology needs, etc) What are some ideas from CT to Employers? • Have people who are HOV, register with you so that they are guaranteed a ride home through the CT program. • CT can create a zip -code map of where employees live to help employers organize vanpools and carpools. • ETCs should email employees to ask who is interested in carpooling or vanpooling and send the names and addresses to CT, who will find carpools and vanpool for the employees. What are the things that work for employers? • SNC provides a list of bus routes, schedules, and maps on their intranet for employees • Need a contact person for new employees to distribute information and help them find an HOV route to work Packet Page 433 of 463 • Use non -monetary incentives for people to participate in the program such as offering an additional "casual dress dart'' at work. • Create company -specific CTR marketing materials that combine information from CT and specific company promotions. • Extend bike to work month throughout the summer and provide company prize or incentives for winning rider or team. • Provide an initial incentive for trying non-SOV modes of transportation, but possibly not a long-term incentive. Examples include $501mo subsidy for first 6 months of vanpooling or 1 free monthly bus pass. What are the problems for employers? • About 213 of the employers have a second and/or third shift. • There are not many restaurants or other services in the office parks, so people feel they have to drive to get lunch and run errands. • Bus service to Canyon Park is not frequent enough and there isn't a good connection from the park and ride to employer sites. What is the benefit of the CTR program for Employers? • CTR is an incentive • Makes employees happier if they aren't stuck in traffic • Retains employees if they have a good commute What types of things would employers like to see in the GTEC? • Sidewalks or bike lanes for bikes and pedestrians. • More frequent bus service from Canyon Park to North Creek and Downtown • Subsidies for employees using GTEC money or other grant money What are some of the benefits and incentives? • TetraTech Flexpass provided by employer. Contract between County and Company • Limited parking $2 per day (or $40 per month) for using alternative modes of transportation which has to be filled out daily • $50 voucher -- better than $2 per day • Comcast tried a pilot program of 12 people to work from home and they loved it. Lisa Fiser's company is also thinking of trying this too • Monroe working on walk/bike program What are some of the challenges? • Record keeping. Hard to collect data requested by agencies to track CTR. People don't respond to emails, etc. People are guessing and then when ETC's change, guesses change -- then looks like program is failing. • Require people to turn in form to manager if turning it in within 5 days then eligible for a drawing. Then follow up and pick up remaining forms from people who didn't turn them in. • Email will work better from some or an on-line survey. Packet Page 434 of 463 What are some of the other issues? • There is an online survey offered by CT that goes straight to WSDOT. Need a little training for ETCs to use this. How can local jurisdictions and CT help you meet your 10% red goal in next 4 years (ordinances, etc.)? • Added services — transit. • Comcast interested in putting in a cafeteria so employees don't have to dive at lunch to other side of highway to get lunch. Any incentives? • Schedule transit fair — CT will come and help plan trips and talk to people about options. • Mandatory ETC training to get updates on new codes, annual reporting 1 increased reporting requirements. • Best Practices Quarterly Email Newsletter by CT — networking opportunities. Packet Page 435 of 463 Snohomish County Commute Trip Reduction Employer Workshop Attendance List ETC Worksite ` Jurisdiction Bothell 1/3Q Everett 1123 Barbara White Cascade Valley Hospital Arlington 1 Yvonne Page City of Arlington Arlington 1 Kristin Banfeld City of Arlington Arlington 1 Jennifer Petler Cascade Valley Hospital Arlington 1 Rhonda Rinn DSHS - Smokey Point Arlington 1 Mike Burrow Meridian Yachts Arlington 1 Marsha Larson Alside Windows Company Northwest County 1 Stephen Cross Alside Windows Com any Northwest County 1 Kdsti McEnemey Bingo King Company Count 1 Kimb2!y Alridge Comcast Cable - Everett County 1 Dena Searcy Comcast Cable - Everett Count 1 Rachel Pascual Eldec Corporation County1 Jill Grant Goodrich Aviation Technical Services Count 1 Sue Nelson Reid Middleton Count 1 Kembedy Espiet U.S. Navy - Family Support Complex Coun 1 Don Sims 2tof Edmonds Edmonds 1 Linda Martin Edmonds Family Medicine Clinic Edmonds 1 Sandy Brown Stevens Hospital Edmonds 1 Tracy Sloan City of Lynnwood Lynnwood 1 Judy Boston DSHS - Lynnwood Lynnwood 1 DeEtte Elder Edmonds Commun t College Lynnwood 1 Diane Worthington Edmonds Community College Lynnwood 1 Janice He!ghway Edmonds School District Lynnwood 1 Shelly Devereaux Harris Ford Lynnwood 1 Donna Brunckhorst Verizon Lynnwood 1 Scott Sloan Verizon L nnwood 1 k Chris Holland C4 of Marysville Marysville 1 Lecia Dean C & D Zodiac Marysville 1 Shelley Carpenter City of Monroe Monroe 1 Kate Callowa-Tourtellot Ci of Monroe Monroe 1 Judy Moore MCC - WSRU Monroe 1 Diane McDonald Valley General Hospital Monroe 1 Leslie Choate City of Mountlake Terrace Mtlk. Terr. Al sia Madsen Mila Financial - Mountlake Terrace Mtlk. Terr. 1 Holly Taylor Mila Financial - Mountlake Terrace Mtlk. Terr. 1 Celia Taladoc Premera Blue Cross Mtlk, Terr. 1 Packet Page 436 of 463 .ETC -. Worksite Jurisdiction ' Bothell 1/30 Everett 1123 Jerry Travis Industries Inc. Mukilteo 1 Danielle Campbell Travis Industries Inc. Mukilteo 1 Patty Bumett ADP Bothell - 1 Nikki Meagher ADP Bothell 1 John Barker ADP COS Bothell 1 April Uskoski Allstate Insurance Bothell 1 Jan Law Amgen Bothell 1 Paul Godwin AMS Bothell 1 Cindi G selinck AT&T Bothell 1 Lynda Quinn City of Bothell Bothell 1 Lisa Pritchard Fisery Health Bothell 1 Rich Howell Leviton Mfg. Bothell 1 Sha na Bridgman Molina Healthcare Bothell 1 Michael Anderson Molina Healthcare Bothell 1 HR Re resentative Molina Healthcare Bothell 1 Kelly Lindeman Panasonic Avionics Bothell 1 Sh la Phillips PSE Bothell 1 KC McNeil Romac Industries Bothell 1 Brady Clark Safeco Bothell 1 Barbara Rodgers Seattle Genetics Bothell 1 Mike Manderscheid SNC Lavalin Bothell 1 Mike Ranz SNC Lavalin Bothell 1 __Eathy James State Farm Bothell 1 Jennifer O'Neal Tetra Tech Bothell 1 Kathleen Swyers T-Mobile Bothell 1 Roxanne Lewis T-Mobile Bothell 1 Michael Joachims T-Mobile Bothell 1 -Kristy Thies FDA Bothell 1 Kellie Holden UWB Bothell 1 Nancy Hyde Coming UWB Bothell 1 Lynn Rosseau Achelles USA 1 Nancy Musser Boeing1 Sandra Sinclair Boeing 1 Joanne City of Everett 1 Debbie Anderson Community Transit 1 Traci Kreidler Community Transit 1 Doug Electronetics 1 Theresa D. Everett Clinic 1 George Olson Everett Community College 1 Valerie Everett Providence Medical Center 1 Sabina Popa Everett Transit 1 Cody Dom Fluke 1 Packet Page 437 of 463 ETC' Worksite Jurisdiction Bothell: 1130 Everett 1123 Zac Corker Goose Networks 1 Cariann Little Intermec 1 John Ebean Intermec 1 Chris Buetow Jansport 1 Kimberly E. naval Station Everett 1 Candy Snohomish County 1 Bob Eden Snohomish County PUD 1 Joannie Foltz Snohomish County PUD 1 Sara Poirot Specialty Pull Tabs 1 Diane 1 Donna 1 John Bowler 1 John Hendricks 1 Lisa Fiser 1 Becky Dionne 1 Ken Quinn 1 Charlie Crissman .1 31 63 Packet Page 438 of 463 Appendix G COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION SUMMARY OF POLICIES THAT SUPPORT CTR Packet Page 439 of 463 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES ANALYSIS The following table provides a list of example comprehensive plan goals and policies that are supportive of CTR. These Comprehensive Planning Policies were provided in the CTR Planning Handbook as examples of the types of policies that if adopted by local jurisdictions, will bring their Plan into compliance with both the CTR Law and GMA. Each jurisdiction will have different sets of policies that support CTR in various Comprehensive Plan elements based on the jurisdiction's size, density, and number of urban centers. The left hand column shows the list of example policies and goals. The right hand column identifies the specific policies that the jurisdiction has in place relating to the recommended goals and policies in the left hand column. Land Use Element Work with transit providers to provide transit that is fast, frequent and reliable Medical/Highway 99 between urban centers, urban villages, GTEC's and accessible to most of the Activity Center city's residences and businesses. Policy A.2 Require the integration of non -motorized and transit connections when Activity Centers planning and developing urban centers or GTEC's. Goal A, D; Downtown Waterfront Area Goal 3, Policy EA, E5, E.10, E.14, E.17; Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal 2, 4, 8, Policy A.1, A.2, A.3, A.6 Establish urban centers and/or GTEC's where they can be served by regional Medical/Highway 99 transit agencies, or work with the appropriate transit agency to expand Activity Center Goal service to the urban center within a reasonable timeframe. 1,6 Encourage new housing developments to be located in urban growth areas Downtown and small towns to help provide a sense of community and safe, non- Waterfront Plan motorized transportation to community facilities and public transit modes. Policy E.12 Provide aesthetic and functional amenities along pedestrian facilities, such as Downtown water fountains, benches, trash receptacles, public art, and open spaces Waterfront Plan (such as seating plazas). Policy E.5, E.17; Highway 99 Corridor Policy B_4 Packet Page 440 of 463 Provide pedestrian, and bicycle connections in newly developing areas of the Downtown city, promoting both internal access and linkages with the rest of the city. Waterfront Plan Policy E.5; Highway 99 Corridor Policy B.5; Community Commercial Areas Policy C.4; Neighborhood Commercial Areas Policy D.3 Incorporate transit -supportive and pedestrian friendly design features in new Downtown development through the development review process. Examples include: Waterfront Plan Provide pedestrian pathways that minimize walking distances to activities and Policy E.17; Medical/Highway 99 to transit stops. Activity Center Goal Provide weather protection such as covered walkways or arcades connecting 8, Policy A.1, A.3, building developments, and covered waiting areas for transit and ridesharing. A.6; Highway 99 Corridor Goal 1, Policy B.2, B.5; Community Commercial Areas Policy C.2, C.4; Neighborhood Commercial Areas Policy D.3; Westgate Corridor Policy E.3; Edmonds Way Corridor Policy F.2 Incorporate guidelines for addressing that sidewalks and walkways are Waterfront site separated from the roadway by a landscaping strip or drainage swale. Design Objective F.4.b; Waterfront Landscaping Objective F.5.d Adopt pedestrian friendly design guidelines, especially in high pedestrian Design Objectives activity zones, such as wide sidewalks, landscape buffers or strips, street for Site Design trees, adequate lighting, traffic calming measures (such as traffic circles, curb bulbs, raised medians, speed tables and chicanes), special pavements, and bollards. Adopt development design standards that promote a pedestrian friendly Design Objectives environment. Such standards may include reduced building setbacks, for Site Design requirements for display windows, building entrances oriented toward the street, and locating parking lots to the rear or side of buildings. Packet Page 441 of 463 Require new developments to incorporate non -motorized features or Downtown Design programs designed to promote use of alternatives to single -occupant Objectives Lighting vehicles, such as; a., Pedestrian • Preferential parking for car pools and van pools Access and Connections d.; • Special loading and unloading facilities Design Objectives • Transit facilities, including comfortable bus stops, and waiting areas, for Pedestrian adequate turning room, and where appropriate, signal preemption and Connections Offsite queue jump lanes C.3.d • Bicycle parking and related facilities Integrate multiple access modes, including buses, carpools, and vanpools, Downtown blcycles, and pedestrians. Waterfront Plan Policy E.4 Encourage transit oriented development and pedestrian friendly land use Activity Centers characteristics through zoning and land use policies that encourage mixtures Goal B; Downtown of land uses, increased densities in targeted areas with design standards. Waterfront Plan Goal 4, Policy E.5, E_ 12; Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal 2, 4, Policy A.1, A.5, A.6; Neighborhood Commercial Areas Policy D.2 Housing Element Work with other jurisdictions to achieve a jobs/housing balance that makes it possible for people to live closer to where they work. Transartation Element r , • The county should ensure that continuous and/or direct bicycle lanes are Pedestrian and provided between all jurisdictions and major activity centers. Bicycle Transportation 2.8 Consider pedestrians along with other travel modes in all aspects of Streets and developing the transportation system. Provide safe and convenient Highways 2.2, 3A0, pedestrian access in all new and improved transportation projects, unless 4.3, Pedestrian and Bicycle exceptional circumstances exist. Transportation 1.1, 1.8, 1.11 Remove barriers and deterrents along the existing pedestrian system to Pedestrian and create better access between employment facilities, residential and other Bicycle uses. Transportation 1.5 Packet Page 442 of 463 Coordinate the local jurisdiction's existing and planned pedestrian system Streets and with adjacent jurisdictions to provide a continuous, coordinated system, Highways 4.3, especially when major employment and activity centers are nearby. Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 1.1, Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 2.7 Secure sidewalks and trail improvements or easements through the streets and development review process to develop portions of the pedestrian system. Highways 5.3, Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 1.14, 1.15 er access management to reduce the number of conflict points I(ddnFveways) Streets and between pedestrians and vehicles, thereby improving pedestrian Highways 3.15 ety. Ensure that pedestrian facilities are designed and monitored to improve Pedestrian and security and safety, through lighting, openness, vegetation upkeep and Bicycle security features such as panic buttons at key locations. Transportation 1.6, Public Transportation 3.1 Implement way -finding (signage) along sidewalks and trails that direct Pedestrian and pedestrians to key locations or destinations, such as major activity centers, Bicycle business districts, institutions, major medical facilities, parks or recreational Transportation 2.9 facilities. Provide internal pedestrian circulation systems within and between existing, Public new or redeveloping commercial, multi -family or single family developments, Transportation 3.5 and other appropriate activity centers. Provide convenient connections to frontage pedestrian systems and transit facilities. Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the Streets and existing and future transit and school bus system, and by improving the Highways 4.3, security of and utility of park -and -ride lots and bus stops. Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 1.1, 1.8, 1.15, 2.6, Public Transportation 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6 Provide bicycle connections and secure bicycle parking and storage Pedestrian and convenient to major transit facilities; increase the number of secure parking Bicycle areas for bicycles. Transportation 2.10 Packet Page 443 of 463 Cooperate with the public and private schools, bicycle clubs and other Pedestrian and interests groups to provide education and strategies to promote safe riding Bicycle skills and the transportation and recreation opportunities of bicycling. Transportation 1.11 Improve mobility and safe access for walking and bicycling, and create Streets and incentives to promote non -motorized travel to employment centers, Highways 1.5, 3.10, commercial districts, transit stations, schools and major institutions, and Pedestrian and Bicycle recreational destinations Transportation 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 Sidewalks or pedestrian facilities should be located along all both sides of all Streets and arterials, collectors, and at least one side of most local streets. Highways 4.3, Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 1.13, 1.14, 1.15 Pedestrian facilities should be wide enough to allow the disabled, such as Pedestrian and wheelchair users, to access them, usually a minimum of 5' to 6'. A wider Bicycle facility should be provided along principal arterials (generally a minimum of Transportation 1.9, 8'), or in business districts that attract more pedestrians. Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation 1.13 Direct pedestrian linkages should be considered whenever possible, to Pedestrian and connect between internal land uses and arterials. This reduces walking Bicycle distances to transit stops and commercial uses. Transportation 1.8 courage interconnections and time coordination of public transportationPublic r des (bus, coach and rail) to increase level of service and ridership. Transportation 1.1, 1.2, 2.3 Work with transit providers to provide transit service that is fast, frequent, and Public reliable between urban centers and urban villages and that is accessible to Transportation 1.2, most of the city's residences and businesses. Pursue strategies that make 1.3, 1.4, 2.3 transit safe, secure, comfortable, and affordable. Develop partnerships with transit providers to implement projects providing Public neighborhood -to -transit links that improve pedestrian and bicycle access to Transportation 1.3 transit services and facilities. Coordinate with regional, state, and federal agencies, local governments, and Streets and transit providers when planning and operating transportation facilities and Highways 2.4, services in order to promote regional mobility for people and goods and the Public Transportation 2.2, urban center approach to growth management. 4.1, Capital Facilities, Transportation 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 Design transit access into large developments, considering bus lanes, stops, Public shelters, non -motorized lanes & facilities as part of the project design Transportation 3.5 Packet Page 444 of 463 Coordinate with transit providers and the private sector to develop and Public implement compatible transportation demand management regulations and Transportation 1.6, strategies that are consistent with the Commute Trip Reduction Act. 1.11, Capital Facilities, Transportation 3.2 Provide preferential lanes, such as Nigh Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes on Public roads which will benefit commuters the most, such as those with major transit Transportation 4.1 routes; and those experiencing the greatest congestion. Coordinate ferry arrivals and departures with mass transit systems to ensure Public an efficient flow of people and traffic. Transportation 1.8, 1.9, 1.10 Packet Page 445 of 463 Appendix H GLOSSARY OF TERMS Packet Page 446 of 463 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Affected Employee: Under the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) law, an affected employee is a full-time employee who regularly begins work between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m., at a single work site, on tow or more weekdays for at least 12 continuous months. Affected Employer: An employer is "affected" under the CTR law if there are at least 100 "affected" employees at a single work site. Alternative Work Schedules: AWS programs offer alternatives to the typical eight -hour work day. Options include flex -time, a compressed work week, and staggered work hours. Automobile Dependency: Transportation and land use patterns that result in high levels of automobile use and limited transportation alternatives. In this case, "automobile" includes cars, vans, light trucks, SUVs and motorcycles Base Year: The CTR law requires affected employers to measure the results of their employee trip program against base year values for VMT and drive alone vehicles. The goal year is 2011. Bus Rapid Transit: Special lanes dedicated to transit buses, often incorporating other features to insure high quality transit service. Carpool: Two to six people age 16 and older, sharing the ride in an automobile to and from the work place. Commute: The trip made by an employee between their home and work locations, regardless of the distance or mode used. Compressed Work Week: A work week that is compressed from the typical five-day, 40 hour work week into a shorter work week but maintaining the same number of hours. Commute Trip Reduction Program: A CTR program is comprised of strategies used by an employer to reduce employee use of single -occupant vehicles (SOVs) and the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per employee. The CTR program specifies the measures to be used that will achieve the target goals. Drive Alone Vehicles: A vehicle that is occupied by one person. Employee Transportation Coordinator: The CTR law requires employers to appoint an employee transportation coordinator, or ETC. The personal is personal change agent who provides the "human touch" needed to remedy traffic congestion and air pollution problems. An ETC is the organization's key contact person providing commuting information to employees and liaison activities with transit agencies and local jurisdictions. The ETC creates marketing strategies, administers employee ridesharing programs, and measures results. Packet Page 447 of 463 Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH): GRH programs provide an emergency ride home for employees who commute to work in a ridesharing mode and have an illness or emergency. Typically, an employee can take a cab ride home and charge the ride to their employer's account or be reimbursed for the expense. High -Occupancy Vehicle (HOV): a passenger vehicle carrying more than a specified minimum number of passengers. HOVs include carpools, vanpools, and buses. HOV requirements are often indicated as 3+ (three or more passengers required) or 4+ (four or more passengers required). HOV Lane: This is a traffic lane limited to carrying high occupancy vehicles (HOVs) and certain other qualified vehicles. HOT Lanes (High Occupancy Toll Lanes): HOV facilities that allow lower occupancy vehicles, such as solo drivers, to use the facility if they pay a toll. This offers users three options: drive alone on an unpriced but congested general purpose lane, drive alone and pay to use a less congested lane, or rideshare (carpool, vanpool or ride transit) to use a less congested lane without any additional fee. Mobility: The movement of people and goods. Mobility Management (Also called Transportation Demand Management): Various strategies that change travel behavior (how, when and where people travel) in order to increase transport system efficiency and achieve specific objectives such as reduced traffic congestion, road and parking cost savings, increased safety, improved mobility for non -drivers, energy conservation and pollution emission reductions. Nonmotorized Transportation (also known as Active Transportation and Human Powered Transportation) includes Walking, Bicycling, Small -Wheeled Transport (skates, skateboards, push scooters and hand carts) and, Wheelchair travel. Parking Management: Strategies aimed at making better use of available parking supply. Parking management strategies include preferential parking or price discounts for carpools and/or short- term parkers, and disincentives, prohibitions and price supplements for those contributing more to congestion. Parking Pricing: Strategy to reduce automobile use by requiring motorists to pay directly for using parking facilities. Time variable parking pricing can be used as a congestion reduction strategy. Parking Cash -Out: This means that people (typically commuters, and sometimes residents of multi -family housing) who are offered a free parking space are also offered the cash equivalent when they use alternative transportation modes and so do not impose parking costs. Ridesharing: Ridesharing is any cooperative effort of two or more people sharing a motor vehicle traveling to a common destination, such as a work site. Carpools and vanpools are common forms of ridesharing. Packet Page 448 of 463 Smart Growth: Land use development practices that create more resource efficient and Livable communities, with more Accessible land use patterns. An alternative to sprawl. Sprawl: Dispersed, low -density, single -use, automobile dependent land use patterns. Stakeholder: Individuals or groups that are affected by a decision and have an interest in its outcome. Teleworking: Teleworking involves the use of telephones, computers, and other technology to work from a location other than a conventional office. Transportation Demand Management (TDM): Various strategies that change travel behavior (how, when and where people travel) in order to increase transport system efficiency and achieve specific objectives such as reduced traffic congestion, road and parking cost savings, increased safety, improved mobility for non -drivers, energy conservation and pollution emission reductions. Also called Mobility Management. Transportation Management Association (TMA): A TMA is a partnership or organization that brings interested parties together to work on transportation issues. Vanpool: A vanpool consists of seven to fifteen people sharing their commute in a passenger van, generally riding to the same place of employment. Vehicle Miles Traveled: Number of miles a vehicle has traveled for a commute. Packet Page 449 of 463 AM-1039 Broadband Business Case Contract Award Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: Submitted By: 06/19/2007 Dan Clements Time: Department: Administrative Services Type: Review Committee: Finance Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subiect Title Broadband Business Case Contract Award. 15 Minutes Action Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the Mayor be authorized to execute a contract with DynamicCity in the amount not to exceed $41,000 for a broadband business case study. Previous Council Action 9. The 2006 budget contained $120,000 to link City fiber with the Westin in Seattle, and study the feasibility of a city-wide broadband network. On May 8 the Finance Committee approved issuance of a business plan study, and this was approved by the full Council on May 20. The award of the bid to DynamicCity in a not to exceed amount of $41,000 was approved by the Council appointed Community Technology Advisory Committee on June 7, and approved by the Finance Committee on June 12. Narrative Formal responses to the business plan proposal were received on June 6 from the two RFI finalists. DynamicCity provided the low bid of $41,000. The proposal will examine the pro's, eon's, and costs associated with constructing a City-wide fiber optic network that can potentially serve Edmonds city government, neighboring educational and governmental entities, and area residents and businesses. Of the original $120,000 project budget, $85,000 has been appropriated and $10,000 of this amount remains unspent. Approval of this award would leave approximately $4,000 of the original $120,000 remaining. Fiscal Impact Attachments No files) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 11:28 AM APRV Packet Page 450 of 463 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 12:16 PM APRV Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:19 PM APRV Form Started By: Dan Started On: 06/13/2007 10:43 Clements AM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 451 of 463 AM-1040 Fiber Optic Equipment Appropriation Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: Submitted By: 06/19/2007 Dan Clements Time: Department: Administrative Services Type: Review Committee: Finance Action: Recommend Review by Full Council 15 Minutes Action Information Subject Title Fiber Optic Equipment Appropriation. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve appropriating $56,200 for fiber optic switching, routing, and cabling equipment. Previous Council Action 10. The 2006 budget contained $120,000 to link City fiber with the Westin in Seattle, and study the feasibility of a city-wide broadband network. There is currently a request before Council to award the business plan consulting contract. These fiber link and business plan will essentially expend the $120,000. The Council appointed Community Technology Advisory Committee approved this proposal on June 7. The Finance Committee approved submittal to the full Council on June 12. Narrative This equipment is needed to provide a means of "splitting" the City's fiber optic cable running from the Westin so it can be used by multiple entities. The City is currently collecting $1,200/month for a single direct connection. It was originally anticipated that additional commercial use of the City's fiber network would wait until completion of the formal business plan. However, as the attachedpro formas show, the addition of Edmonds School District and Edmonds Community College as customers would result in the equipment being paid for within two years. This also would result in cost savings and increased service for both of these educational systems. If additional public entities participate, the payback is fairly dramatically accelerated. It is anticipated that the business plan will be completed in early Fall, and summer is the optimal time to connect educational users. Aside from use by other entities, this equipment will enable the City to begin a serious evaluation of activities such as video arraignments, which would result in greatly reduced Police Officer transportation time for court activities. It is proposed that the purchase of this equipment be made from the General Fund, and that revenues generated be used to repay the General Fund. Any additional revenues would flow to the General Fund. Packet Page 452 of 463 Fiscal Impact A++anhmnn+a Link: Broad Band Business Case Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 11:28 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/13/2007 12:16 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/13/2007 02:19 PM APRV Form Started By: Dan Started On: 06/13/2007 11:14 Clements AM Final Approval Date: 06/13/2007 Packet Page 453 of 463 Broadband Business Case: Initial Customer Analysis Last week staff prepared out a first look at a pro forma for our proposed fiber optic network, and will be a discussion topic at Thursday morning's CTAC meeting and the June 12 Finance Committee meeting. This examples below deal with only providing service to three customers: Edmonds School District, Edmonds Community College, and NetRiver. Below are two scenarios based on the discussions we have had so far with these entities. FIGURE 1: THREE CUSTOMER PRELIMINARY PRO FORMA Item:: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Yr Total Scenario 1: High Utilization Net Revenue 8,225) 52,591 52,591 57,217 57,217 57,217 268,606 Scenario 2: Current Utilization Net Revenue 33,002 31,052 31,052 38,916 38,916 38,916 145,850 It very much looks like the cost savings that the school district and community college can achieve are transferable to other public entities such as cities, ports, dispatch, and fire districts. We ran the model with three additional entities participating and below are the results. FIGURE 2: SIX CUSTOMER PRELIMINARY PRO FORMA Item:: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Yr Total Scenario 1: High Utilization Net Revenue 38,032 98,848 98,848 103,474 103,474 103,474 546,151 Scenario 2: Current Utilization Net Revenue 1,547 62,507 62,507 70,371 70,371 70,371 334,581 There is pretty easily a market for 15-20 public entities in our immediate area. These figures do not include potential opportunities like NetRiver really taking off, providing access to other for profit companies, or setting up a broadband network for local residents and businesses. The bottom line is that, so far, this looks quite encouraging. On the increased service and cost reduction side of the ledger, this also gets us much of the infrastructure needed to provide for things like video arraignments, streaming of Council meetings over the Internet, and wireless communications with our public safety and field crews. The more detailed spreadsheets backing up these estimates follow as attachments. C:APROJECTS\FIBER W IFIABROADBAND BUSINESS CASE.DOC Packet Page 454 of 463 Broadband Business Case, Page 2 FIGURE 3: THREE CUSTOMER MODEL Scenario 1: High Utilization Revenues: Mbit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Yr Total Edmonds Community College 20-30 23,129 23,129 23,129 27,754 27,754 27,754 152,650 Edmonds School District 20-30 23,129 27,754 27,754 27,754 27,754 27,754 161,901 Net -River Provider n/a 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 T-1 Remaining Cost Reduction 10 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 51,600 Revenue Sub -Total n/a 1 84,857 89,483 89,483 94,109 94,109 1 94,109 546,151 Expenditures: Equipment/Facilities n/a 46,190 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiber Runs n/a 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Support Annual n/a 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 19,754 Transport Fee Annual n/a 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 201,600 Expenditure Sub Total n/a 93,083 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 277,545 Net Revenue n/a 8,225 52,591 52,591 57,217 57,217 1 57,217 268,606 Scenario 2: Current Utilization Revenues: Mbit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Yr Total Edmonds Community College 20-30 15,728 15,728 15,728 23,591 23,591 23,591 117,957 Edmonds School District 20-30 15,728 23,591 23,591 23,591 23,591 23,591 133,684 Net -River Provider n/a 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144,000 T-1 Remaining Cost Reduction 10 4,626 4,626 4,626 4,626 4,626 4,626 27,754 Revenue Sub -Total n/a 60,081 67,945 67,945 75,808 75,808 1 75,808 423,395 Expenditures: Equipment/Facilities n/a 46,190 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiber Runs n/a 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Support Annual n/a 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 19,754 Transport Fee Annual n/a 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 201,600 Expenditure Sub Total n/a 93,083 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 277,545 Net Revenue n/a 33,002 31,052 31,052 38,916 38,916 1 38,916 145,850 Scenario 2: Current Utilization/Three Year Exposure Revenues: Mbit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 3 Yr Total Edmonds Community College 20-30 15,728 15,728 15,728 47,183 Edmonds School District 20-30 15,728 23,591 23,591 62,910 Net -River Provider n/a 24,000 24,000 24,000 72,000 T-1 Remaining Cost Reduction 10 4,626 4,626 4,626 13,877 Revenue Sub -Total n/a 1 60,081 67,945 67,945 195,970 Expenditures: Equipment/Facilities n/a 46,190 0 0 0 Fiber Runs n/a 10,000 0 0 0 Equipment Support Annual n/a 3,292 3,292 3,292 9,877 Transport Fee Annual n/a 33,600 33,600 33,600 100,800 Expenditure Sub Total n/a 1 93,083 1 36,892 1 36,892 1 166,868 Net Revenue n/a 33,002 31,052 1 31,052 1 29,102 Packet Page 455 of 463 Broadband Business Case, Page 3 FIGURE 4: SIX CUSTOMER MODEL Scenario 1: High Utilization Revenues: Mbit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Yr Total Edmonds Community College 20-30 23,129 23,129 23,129 27,754 27,754 27,754 152,650 Edmonds School District 20-30 23,129 27,754 27,754 27,754 27,754 27,754 161,901 Customer One 10 Mbit 10-10 11,564 11,564 11,564 11,564 11,564 11,564 69,386 Customer Two 10 Mbit 10-10 11,564 11,564 11,564 11,564 11,564 11,564 69,386 Customer Three 20 Mbit 20-20 1 23,129 23,129 23,129 23,129 23,129 1 23,129 23,129 Net -River Provider n/a 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 T-1 Remaining Cost Reduction 10 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 51,600 Revenue Sub -Total n/a 131,115 135,741 135,741 140,366 140,366 140,366 823,695 Expenditures: Equipment/Facilities n/a 46,190 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiber Runs n/a 10,000 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Equipment Support Annual n/a 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 19,754 Transport Fee Annual n/a 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 201,600 Expenditure Sub Total n/a 93,083 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 277,545 Net Revenue n/a 38,032 98,848 98,848 103,474 103,474 103,474 546,151 Scenario 2: Current Utilization Revenues: Mbit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Yr Total Edmonds Community College 20-30 15,728 15,728 15,728 23,591 23,591 23,591 117,957 Edmonds School District 20-30 15,728 23,591 23,591 23,591 23,591 23,591 133,684 Customer One 10 Mbit 10-10 7,864 7,864 7,864 7,864 7,864 7,864 47,183 Customer Two 10 Mbit 10-10 7,864 7,864 7,864 7,864 7,864 7,864 47,183 Customer Three 20 Mbit 20-20 1 15,728 15,728 15,728 15,728 15,728 1 15,728 94,365 Net -River Provider n/a 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 144,000 T-1 Remaining Cost Reduction 10 4,626 4,626 4,626 4,626 4,626 4,626 27,754 Revenue Sub -Total n/a 91,536 99,400 99,400 107,263 107,263 107,263 612,125 Expenditures: Equipment/Facilities n/a 46,190 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiber Runs n/a 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equipment Support Annual n/a 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 3,292 19,754 Transport Fee Annual n/a 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 201,600 Expenditure Sub Total n/a 93,083 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 36,892 277,545 Net Revenue n/a 1,547 62,507 62,507 70,371 70,371 70,371 334,581 Packet Page 456 of 463 Broadband Business Case, Page 4 Scenario 2: Current Utilization/Three Year Exposure Revenues: Mbit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 3 Yr Total Edmonds Community College 20-30 15,728 15,728 15,728 47,183 Edmonds School District 20-30 15,728 23,591 23,591 62,910 Customer One 10 Mbit 10-10 7,864 7,864 7,864 23,591 Customer Two 10 Mbit 10-10 1 7,864 7,864 7,864 23,591 Customer Three 20 Mbit 20-20 15,728 15,728 15,728 47,183 Net -River Provider n/a 24,000 24,000 24,000 72,000 T-1 Remaining Cost Reduction 10 4,626 4,626 4,626 13,877 Revenue Sub -Total n/a 91,536 99,400 99,400 290,335 Expenditures: Equipment/Facilities n/a 46,190 0 0 0 Fiber Runs n/a 10,000 0 0 0 Equipment Support Annual n/a 3,292 3,292 3,292 9,877 Transport Fee Annual n/a 33,600 33,600 33,600 100,800 Expenditure Sub Total n/a 93,083 36,892 36,892 166,868 Net Revenue n/a 1,547 62,507 62,507 123,468 Packet Page 457 of 463 AM-1048 11. Report on City Council Committee Meetings Edmonds City Council Meeting 2007 Date: 06/19/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase Time: 15 Minutes Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Information Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Report on City Council Committee Meetings. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached are copies of the following City Council Committee Meeting Minutes: 1. June 12, 2007 Community Services/Development Services Committee Meeting 2. June 12, 2007 Finance Committee Meeting 3. June 12, 2007 Public Safety Committee Meeting Link: CSDS Committee Link: Finance Committee Link: Public Safety Committee Fiscal Impact A ++ohm on+e Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 02:06 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/14/2007 03:54 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/14/2007 04:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Started On: 06/13/2007 04:26 Chase PM Final Approval Date: 06/14/2007 Packet Page 458 of 463 Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting June 12, 2007 Elected Officials Present: Staff Present: Mauri Moore, Council member Duane Bowman, Dev. Services Director Richard Marn, Committee Chair Dave Gebert, City Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Traffic Engineer Brian McIntosh, Parks Director Committee Chair Marin convened the meeting at 6:00 P.M. A. Presentation of Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Plan. Duane Bowman introduced Jonathan Dong from Perteet Inc. who worked on the development of the draft plan as part of a group effort of a group of cities and Snohomish County to prepare CTR plans for review by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). Jay Larson from Snohomish County coordinated the effort in Snohomish County. Mr. Dong reviewed the history of the CTR legislation and the new requirements facing the City of Edmonds. He reviewed the draft plan and outlined the process for compliance with State law. He pointed out that the City has three major employers subject to the law; the City of Edmonds, Stevens Hospital and Edmonds Family Clinic. The draft plan establishes new goals for these employers to achieve by 2011. ACTION: CS/DS Committee recommends that the City Council pass a motion to endorse the draft plan and forward it to the PSRC. B. Tobacco Free Parks Discussion. Brian McIntosh introduced the topic. He noted that the proposal to create tobacco free parks started in 2001 with the cities of Arlington and Marysville and has grown to include 12 communities. The Snohomish County Health Department essentially provided all the materials (signs, brochures, etc) at no cost to the city. Brian noted that it now seems appropriate to do this in conjunction with the new health initiatives and the no smoking law passed by the residents of Washington. ACTION: The CS/DS Committee directed staff to bring a resolution forward to the City Council for consideration on the regular agenda for June 19, 2007. The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Packet Page 459 of 463 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES June 12, 2007 6:00 PM Present: Councilmember Ron Wambolt Councilmember Dave Orvis Council President Peggy Pritchard Olson Staff- Al Compaan Sandy Chase Kathleen Junglov Noel Miller Dan Clements Public: Roger Hertrich Committee Chair Orvis called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Item A: Domestic Violence Coordinator Acting Chief Al Compaan provided Committee members with background information on the City's domestic violence program. It was the Committee's consensus to forward the recommendation of establishing a domestic violence position that replaces the former contract arrangement to the full Council as a consent item. Item B: Domestic Violence Interlocal Agreement Committee members recommended moving the interlocal agreement with the City of Mill Creek, where by Mill Creek and Edmonds share domestic violence support services on a two third, one third basis, to the full Council as a consent item. Item C: Purchasing greement City Clerk Sandy Chase presented a proposal to renew the City's purchasing contract with Office Max, and also participate in their America Saves program. This will further reduce City costs. The Committee requested that this be placed as a consent item before the Council. Item D: Interfund Loan Authorization A house -keeping item relating to interfund loan authorization was reviewed by Assistant Director Kathleen Junglov. The ordinance clarifies the Administrative Services Director's role in setting up interfund loans and reporting back to Council. It was the Committee's consensus to move this item to the full Council as a consent agenda item. Item E: Surplus Assets Public Works Director Noel Miller and Assistant Director Kathleen Junglov discussed the revised fixed asset policy, and reviewed a list of surplus items recommended for disposal. Most of the items on this list had been stored beneath the bleachers, some for as long as 20 years. V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\2007 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES\FINANCE - 070612.DOC Packet Page 460 of 463 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 Mr. Roger Hertrich raised a question about any statutory requirements related to advertising the surplussing of specific items. Staff will contact Municipal Research Services and forward their response to the Committee. The Committee recommended forwarding this item to Council as a consent item. Item F: Back -Up Server Acquisition Committee members reviewed a request to purchase back-up network servers for $38,000, and have this included with mid -year budget adjustments. After an audit of the City's network, it was found that there is no redundancy for the City's e-mail, financial, and cash receipting/internet payment systems. In the past year these systems have been down a number of times. The Committee recommended forwarding this item to the full Council as a consent agenda item. Item G. is Broadband Business Case Committee members reviewed responses to the previously issued broadband business plan request for proposals. The Motorola bid was $350,000 plus expenses, while the DynamicCity proposal was $41,000. The Committee approved forwarding the award of this contract to the full Council for their consideration. Item G. ii: Fiber Optic Equipment Acquisition The Finance Committee next reviewed a staff proposal to purchase $56,200 for fiber optic switching, routing, and cabling equipment. This will enable the City to offer internet services to jurisdictions like the Edmonds School District and Edmonds Community College. As originally envisioned, the City would start providing these types of services after the business plan had been fully completed. However, there appears to be immediate demand for these services, and the return on investment for the equipment is under two years. The Committee approved forwarding this proposal to the Council for their consideration. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 PM. Packet Page 461 of 463 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting June 12, 2007 Committee Members Present: Council member Michael Plunkett, Acting Chair Staff Present: Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg Assistant Fire Chief Mark Correira Acting Police Chief Al Compaan Guests: The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Council member/Chair Deanna Dawson was ill and unable to attend the meeting. A. Substitute House Bill 1756 Annual Compliance Report Fire staff reviewed the information contained in the Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo (AM-1023) to include updated Section 4 information provided by the City Attorney. Staff pointed out that with this first of required annual reports, the reporting form was established for subsequent years. Substitute House Bill 1756 Annual Compliance Report will be posted on the Fire Department website. Committee member Plunkett summarized the agenda memo and staff presentation by stating that the Fire Department was in constant pursuit of ways to improve emergency response times consistent with the measurable standards adopted by the City Council. Action: Forward to the City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve. B. 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan Update #1 Fire staff reviewed the information contained in the Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo (AM-1010) to include the 26 goals identified in the 2007-2008 Work Plan. The 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan Update #1 will be posted on the Fire Department website. The next 2007-2008 Work Plan update will maintain update #1 language with update #2 language hi -lighted in bold to identify progress made. Committee member Plunkett directed Fire Staff to send the 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan Update #1 to City Council members. On a non-scheduled item, Assistant Chief Correira reported that the search for a Medical Program Director to replace Dr. James Mercer, who has served since 1998, has entered its final phase. Action: Send the 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan Update #1 to City Council members. Packet Page 462 of 463 C. Interlocal Agreement establishing Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force, Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Acting Police Chief Compaan gave an overview of what the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force was. After the overview Acting Police Chief Compaan asked that this item be placed on the Consent Agenda for review and approval. Acting Chair Michael Plunkett recommended that this item be placed on the Consent Agenda for June 19, 2007. Action: On June 12, 2007 the Public Safety Committee met. The committee reviewed the "Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force, Fiscal Year 2007-2008" Interlocal Agreement. Acting Chair Plunkett recommended a "do pass" with the item to be placed on the consent agenda for June 19, 2007. Meeting adjourned at 1830 hours Packet Page 463 of 463