HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007.08.20 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North
______________________________________________________________
Special Monday Meeting
August 20, 2007
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1.Approval of Agenda
2.Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B.AM-1127
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of August 7, 2007.
C.AM-1138
Approval of claim checks #98147 through #98320 for August 9, 2007 in the amount of $549,630.36 and
#98321 through #98470 for August 16, 2007 in the amount of $1,248,681.37.
D.AM-1126
Judicial salary increase to maintain State funding for judicial position.
E.AM-1135
Proposed Ordinance rezoning property at 125 2nd Ave North from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5. (R-2007-15).
F.AM-1136
Proposed Ordinance rezoning property located at 318 - 320 Walnut Street from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5 (File
R-2007-28).
G.AM-1132
2007 Second Quarter Budget Amendment.
H.AM-1133
Proposed Ordinance to establish a procedure for Constitutionally Protected Events.
I.AM-1134
Report on bids opened on August 14, 2007 for the 95th Place West Storm Drainage Improvement Project and
award of contract to Interwest Construction, Inc. ($112,790).
J.AM-1121
Proposed Resolution thanking Student Representative Shaun Callahan.
3.AM-1130
(5 Min)
Presentation of Resolution and plaque to Student Representative Shaun Callahan.
4.AM-1125
(10 Min)
Acceptance of Point Edwards Public Easements.
5.AM-1137
(10 Min)
Report on staff's actions regarding the July 26, 2007 Special Meeting of the Community/Development
Services Committee.
6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)
7.AM-1128
(15 Min)
Report on City Council Committee Meetings.
Packet Page 1 of 217
8.(5 Min)Mayor's Comments
9.(15 Min)Council Comments
10.Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 217
AM-1127 2.B.
8/7/2007 Draft Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of August 7, 2007.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 8/7/07 Draft Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 08/13/2007 08:55 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/13/2007 09:14 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 08/13/2007 09:17 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 08/13/2007 08:48
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/13/2007
Packet Page 3 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
August 7, 2007
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Shaun Callahan, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Debi Humann, Human Resources Manager
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Marin requested Item E be removed from the Consent Agenda and Councilmember
Wambolt requested Item G be removed.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON, TO
APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 24, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #97775 THROUGH #97961 FOR JULY 26, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,259,390.16, AND #97962 THROUGH #98146 FOR AUGUST 2, 2007
IN THE AMOUNT OF $287,429.58. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS
AND CHECKS #45284 THROUGH #45385 FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 16 THROUGH
JULY 31, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $822,564.77.
D. RENEWAL OF THE SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT BETWEEN PUBLIC SAFETY
TESTING, INC. AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS (POLICE DEPARTMENT).
F. REPORT ON BID ADVERTISEMENT AND RESPONSE FOR THE FRANCES
ANDERSON SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RETROFIT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE
STAFF TO PLACE A SECOND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN REGARD TO THIS
PROJECT.
Packet Page 4 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 2
H. RESOLUTION NO. 1150 AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CITY COUNCIL RULES
OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NOS. 292 AND 463.
ITEM E: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS
FROM CONSULTANTS FOR THE SR99/76TH AVENUE W INTERSECTION SAFETY
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
Councilmember Marin explained he pulled this item from the Consent Agenda in order to draw attention
to it. He noted this was an opportunity the Hwy. 99 Task Force had been working on, one of many
intersections on Hwy. 99 that needed improvement. This action will fund some design so that the project
would be eligible for grant funding.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, FOR
APPROVAL OF ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM G: PROPOSED ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
ADJACENT TO 17008 - 77TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS.
Councilmember Wambolt explained although he supported the vacation of the right-of-way, he did not
agree with the proposed price to sell the property to the property owner. He noted that the proposed price
for the 540 square feet was $1,400, less than $3 per square foot compared with the adjacent land that was
valued at $62.60 per square foot. He explained if the price of $62.60 square foot were used, divided by
half as required by State law, the value of the property would be approximately $17,000. He requested a
Councilmember who previously voted in the affirmative on this issue to introduce a motion for
reconsideration.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether Dave Geber, City Engineer, was familiar with the appraisal that
was done on the property by Mr. Wills. Mr. Gebert answered he was not.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
FOR RECONSIDERATION. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3),
COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT, MOORE, PLUNKETT AND ORVIS IN FAVOR, AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON AND MARIN OPPOSED.
Mayor Haakenson advised the matter would be scheduled on an upcoming agenda.
3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF THE GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
"A TASTE OF EDMONDS" 25TH ANNIVERSARY, AUGUST 10 - 12, 2007.
Mayor Haakenson read a proclamation in honor of the Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce 25th
anniversary of the Taste of Edmonds and presented the proclamation to Chamber of Commerce Executive
Director Jan Vance and Sandra Waldo, Chamber Board Member and Taste of Edmonds organizer.
Ms. Vance thanked the City for the proclamation, commenting on the Chamber’s 100th anniversary and
25th anniversary of the Taste of Edmonds. Ms. Waldo encouraged everyone to attend the event.
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
CHAPTER 7.30 ECC, WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES, TO ADD A NEW SECTION
7.30.036, SEWER SPECIAL CONNECTION DISTRICTS, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL
CONNECTION FEE FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON 88TH AVENUE WEST, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE..
City Engineer Dave Gebert explained the City has completed construction of the 220th Street SW
Improvements project. During the planning for that project, it was determined three private properties
along 220th Street SW within the project limits (21903, 21904 and 21911 88th Avenue West) would be
Packet Page 5 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 3
sewer customers of the City of Edmonds sewer utility if/when they connected to the sewer system. Due
to the likelihood that these properties would need to connect to the sewer system in the future because of
septic system failure, future development, etc., it was determined by staff and Council to be appropriate to
install a sewer collector stub out for these properties in conjunction with the 220th Street SW
Improvement project to avoid future cutting into 220th Street SW to connect these properties to sewer
after the 220th Street SW Improvement project was completed.
A neighborhood meeting was held in February 2004 to inform affected property owners of the City’s
plans to construct a sewer collector stub out in conjunction with the 220th Street SW Improvement project
for future connection of these properties to the sewer system and to implement a sewer special connection
fee. In March 2004, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the construction of the sewer collector
stub out and the establishment and implementation of a sewer special connection fee. Accordingly, the
construction of the 220th Street SW Improvement project included installation of an 8-inch diameter
sewer line from the sewer main located in 220th Street SW to the edge of the right-of-way at the northeast
corner of the intersection of 220th Street SW and 88th Avenue West. The sewer stub out was capped and
available for the future connection of three private properties to the City sewer system. Mr. Gebert noted
the future construction of the sewer collector to connect these properties to the collector stub out installed
by the City would be the responsibility of these property owners.
The City sewer capital improvement Fund 412-300 provided the funds for construction of a sewer
collector stub out for these three properties and the cost of construction should be recovered from the
private property owners who will use and benefit from the sewer collector stub out constructed. Per the
City Attorney, there is no legal requirement for the City to recover the cost from the private property
owners; however, the City should recover the cost for reasons of consistency with past practices and
fairness to other rate payers. The City has historically required private property owners pay the cost of
extending utility systems to serve their private properties. Special connection fees are authorized by
RCW 35.92.020 and must be adopted by City Council ordinance.
Mr. Gebert explained in March 2004 the Council directed staff to proceed with establishing the sewer
special connection fee with the following elements:
• Equitable fee prorated among the private properties based upon actual costs.
• Special connection fee must be paid in full at time of connection.
• The property owners will be allowed to defer connection.
• Include in the ordinance the ability to adjust the connection fee for inflation to account for the
City fronting the money from the time of construction to the time of connection and that the
special connection fee to be in addition to the City's normal sewer connection fee and all other
applicable permit fees.
• Upon completion of construction and determination of the actual costs, staff present an ordinance
for adopting the special connection fee
Construction has been completed and the actual costs have been determined; the actual final cost of the
sewer collector stub out is $12,852.87, or $4,284.29 per lot.
Mr. Gebert explained in February 2004, preliminary estimates for the sewer special connection fee were
in the range of $2,000 to $3,000 and affected property owners were informed of the preliminary estimate.
The actual amount is higher than the 2004 estimates due primarily to significant increases in construction
costs since then attributed to inflation. The affected property owners have been advised in writing of the
amount of the actual costs and proposed special connection fee and of the scheduled public hearing.
Packet Page 6 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 4
Mr. Gebert reviewed his response to questions posed by the property owners since being informed of the
amount of the sewer special connection fee:
• Could the special connection fee be paid in advance or in installments? Mr. Gebert advised the
fee could be paid in advance but City policy did not allow for installment payments.
• Would properties at 8805 220th and 21919 88th Avenue West be allowed to connect to the stub
out? Mr. Gebert answered no as both properties were connected to the sewer system via an
adequately sized sewer connection.
• If one property owner incurred the total cost to install their portion of the 8-inch sewer line to
connect their property and the other two properties did not participate, would the other two
property owners be required to pay a special connection fee and how would the one property
owner recover the cost? Mr. Gebert answered the other property owners would be required to
pay the special connection fee and there were several options for recovering the cost, the most
viable being a latecomers agreement which the City would assist with establishing.
• Why is the actual cost significantly higher than the estimated cost? Mr. Gebert answered the
initial estimate was prepared in late 2003 and assumed construction in 2004, however, the project
was not constructed until 2005. Since that time construction costs have escalated significantly
industry-wide due to increases in material costs as well as the amount of work available does not
require contractors to bid on government jobs and when they do, their bids are high. He recalled
the 220th project received only two bids; the low bid was somewhat higher than the engineer’s
estimate and the second bid was significantly higher than the estimate. The actual costs of the
special connection fee are based on the bid unit prices and actual quantities. The property owners
requested a detailed cost breakdown of the work that was done which staff provided.
• Could the Council adopt a smaller amount for the fee than the actual cost? Mr. Gebert reviewed
the following breakdown of the cost elements:
Construction Contract
Design
Engineering
Direct
Items
Indirect
Items*
Total
Construction
Contract
Construction
Engineering/
Management
Total
Cost $1,162.00 $8,824.17 $1,979.30 $10,803.47 $887.40 $12,852.87
Divided by # of
developable lots
3 3 3 3 3 3
Special connection
fee = total per lot
$387.33 $2,941.39 $659.77 $3,601.16 $295.80 $4,284.29
* Prorated allocation of indirect construction contract costs such as mobilization, traffic control,
surveying, etc.
Mr. Gebert noted the cost breakdown did not include in-house costs. He concluded the Council could
establish a fee that was less than the actual cost as it could be argued that there was benefit to the general
public by connecting these properties to sewer. However, if benefited property owners did not pay for the
connection, the sewer utility rate payers paid the costs.
He noted the general sewer connection fee covered the costs of typical connections and special
connection fees covered special costs. He recalled other funding alternatives had been considered such as
a Local Improvement District (LID) which would have included additional costs such as appraisal costs,
in-house salary costs, etc. He noted the City also anticipated another special connection fee for a project
on Olympic View Drive. The fee established in this instance was likely to set a precedent for the fee for
that project. Mr. Gebert recommended the Council adopt the special connection fee in the amount of the
actual cost - $4,284.29.
Packet Page 7 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 5
Councilmember Plunkett asked why the City did not accept installment payments and whether other cities
did. Mr. Gebert answered it was the Finance Department’s policy and the advice of the City Attorney for
administrative reasons, and to avoid loaning funds, that the City not accept installment payments. He
recalled this was discussed in March 2004 and a decision was made that the connection fee would be paid
in full at the time of connection.
Councilmember Plunkett recalled the last time there were a number of property owners connecting to
sewer was in Perrinville. Mr. Gebert explained that was done via an LID and there were a large number
of properties connecting.
Councilmember Moore recalled when she lived in Woodway, sewers were installed on Woodway Park
Road and they were assessed twice the amount of the proposed connection fee for the stub out and were
allowed to make installment payments to the Town of Woodway. She encouraged the Council to
consider installment payments if the full cost of the connection fee was adopted. She referred to staff’s
comment about inflation affecting the estimate and suggested re-estimating projects closer to the time of
construction or factor in inflation. Mr. Gebert answered for the 220th project, a consultant updated the
engineer’s estimate a few months prior to bid using the latest WSDOT bids and the bids were fairly close;
the engineer’s estimate was $4.2 million and the low bid was $4.3 million. He reviewed 2003 estimates
for each element of the project that resulted in a per lot connection fee of $1,962. That amount was
adjusted in anticipation of inflation and cost escalation. Property owners were informed the amount
would be in the range of $2,000 to $3,000, anticipating construction would occur in 2004; however,
construction did not begin until 2005. He pointed out the contract bid was a unit price bid; the actual cost
was actual quantities at the bid unit prices. He noted if the quantities were as estimated, the special
connection fee would have been $5,472; the actual quantities were less which resulted in a lower special
connection fee.
Councilmember Moore asked when staff became aware of the $5,472 amount. Mr. Gebert answered May
2005. Councilmember Moore asked whether staff informed the property owners of the increase at that
time. Mr. Gebert answered he did not. Councilmember Moore expressed concern the property owners
were not informed that the estimate had increased. She also objected to staff’s comment that staff time
was not factored in, remarking that was the engineering department’s job. Mr. Gebert agreed when a
project was for the general utility or general public; however, this was a project for the sole benefit of
specific property owners.
Councilmember Dawson recalled when this was discussed in 2004, the reason for constructing the stub
out in conjunction with the 220th project was to benefit the property owners. She asked the cost to the
property owners if it had not been done in conjunction with the 220th project. Mr. Gebert answered the
property owners would avoid the cost of cutting into and repairing the street and frontage improvements.
He noted there were also reasons it could cost the property owners less such as they would not be required
to pay prevailing wages as the City was. He summarized the reason the stub out was constructed in
conjunction with the 220th project was to avoid the property owner’s cost of cutting into the pavement and
to avoid a cut and patch on the new street.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether the property owners would be required to connect to sewer. Mr.
Gebert answered the ordinance allowed the property owners to connect when they chose to or needed to.
He explained the City code required connection within 60 days of installation of the stub out; however,
Council direction in 2004 was that they be allowed to defer connection which the proposed ordinance
permitted. Councilmember Dawson pointed out the property owners could begin setting funds aside for
their eventual connection.
Packet Page 8 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 6
Councilmember Dawson inquired about one property owner connecting. Mr. Gebert explained they
would pay only their special connection fee but there would be significant costs to install the sewer line
from the stub up the street to their residence. Payment by the other property owners could be addressed
via a latecomers agreement.
Councilmember Dawson inquired about the indirect costs. Mr. Gebert explained it was a prorated
allocation of costs for mobilization, traffic control, surveying, etc. for the entire contract and not directly
attributable to a single work item. Councilmember Dawson commented that due to the significant
increase in the cost, a rational reduction may be to subtract the indirect costs. Mr. Gebert agreed the
Council could establish the connection fee via subtracting one or more of the cost elements.
Councilmember Dawson acknowledged this may set a precedent for future projects. Mr. Gebert
responded the only other project he was aware of was on Olympic View Drive. In that project a stub out
would be installed for 8-10 lots and laterals installed for 6-7 properties.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether all the costs had been included in prior special connection fees.
Mr. Gebert answered he was not aware of any other special connection fees; in the past connections had
been addressed via an LID. He advised the proposed ordinance established a new section in the Water
and Sewer rates and charges section for special connection districts; this would be the first special
connection district. She asked whether past LIDs had been accessed the entire cost. Mr. Gebert answered
he had not been involved in an LID in the City but believed all costs were included in the Perrinville LID
including in-house costs, appraisal fees, etc.
Councilmember Plunkett asked why the City constructed the stub out rather than requiring the property
owners to install it. Mr. Gebert answered that option was considered; however, it would have required the
property owners install the stub out as well as incur the significant cost of extending the sewer line to
their residences. He noted there was no code language to require the property owners to install the stub
out. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the property owners would have paid more if they had had
the stub out installed themselves. Mr. Gebert was uncertain, anticipating they would have paid in the
range of the City’s costs.
Councilmember Moore commented in addition to the special connection fee, the property owners also
faced the fee to connect to their homes. She asked whether a lien would be placed on the property so that
the fee would be paid when the house was sold. Mr. Gebert answered staff did not intend to place a lien
on the property. Staff would flag the property in the permit system so that the fee would need to be paid
before a permit was issued to connect to the sewer. Councilmember Moore commented the home could
be sold and the property owner had not paid the fee. Mr. Gebert acknowledged one of these property
owners purchased his home in 2006 and was not informed of the special connection fee. Councilmember
Moore recalled Woodway placed a lien on the properties in the amount of the connection fee which
encouraged many property owners to pay the fee immediately. Mayor Haakenson advised that was the
process for an LID.
Councilmember Plunkett expressed concern that a subsequent property owner may not be aware of the
special connection fee. He was uncertain whether the real estate disclosure form addressed that issue.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
John Wood, Edmonds, affected property owner, commented they were told one amount, never informed
that the costs had increased and now were informed the fee would be higher. He believed the fee could
have been avoided if the three property owners had installed and connected to the sewer before the 220th
project was completed. He pointed out a fourth house, 21919 88th Avenue, was connected via a side
sewer across a neighbor’s yard which he asserted was illegal and unfair. He questioned whether each
Packet Page 9 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 7
property owner was required to pay for the sewer in front of their home including a property that was
connected illegally through another’s yard. He summarized the significantly higher connection fee would
require that they defer connection.
Kim Sharpe, Edmonds, affected property owner, commented they tried several times to connect to
sewer on their own during the past six years, thus had incurred some costs already. He expressed concern
regarding the cost increase, noting they had not been notified that the cost had increased. He suggested
the precedence that should be set was not requiring citizens to pay for the City’s overruns. He
summarized it was not that they would not pay the special connection fee but that it wasn’t fair and
should be within the range of the estimate provided in 2004. He inquired about the possibility of an LID
with the Olympic View Drive sewer. He noted they had been paying an $8 per month sewer supplement
fee since the 1980s for the privilege of hooking up to a stub in the future.
Mr. Wood asked the amount of the connection fee for residents on 88th Place West located behind their
street and in Snohomish County which had the exact situation.
Paul Samione, Edmonds, affected property owner, explained when he purchased the property in
September 2006 he was not informed of the special connection fee. He expressed concern with the
approximately 43% increase in the connection fee over the high end of the estimate, noting connecting to
the sewer would cost each home an additional $20,000 to $25,000. He emphasized the importance of
communication and more accurate estimates.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
In response to the comment that the property owners had tried to connect to sewer in the past, Mr. Gebert
noted one of the options discussed at the neighborhood meeting in February 2004 was establishing an
LID to construct their sewer collector on their own. He acknowledged at that time the City planned to
begin construction on 220th in 2004 but was delayed a year. With regard to the increased cost, he
acknowledged the costs had increased and the project was under-estimated due to the delay.
With regard to the $8 per month sewer supplement fee, Public Works Director Noel Miller explained the
unconnected charge was imposed to defray the cost of constructing the wastewater treatment plant large
enough to include future wastewater treatment for this area. He concluded otherwise a smaller treatment
plant would have been constructed.
With regard to the other properties on 88th Place West, Mr. Gebert acknowledged they were Olympic
View Water and Sewer District customers for whom sewer laterals similar to this were installed in
conjunction with the 220th Street project. Olympic View Water and Sewer District did not plan to
establish a special connection fee for those property owners but includes the cost in the base for their
general connection fee. Edmonds’ philosophy is the general connection fee is capital costs that are
general system costs such as new sewer lift stations, sewer main replacement, etc. and that capital costs
that serve individual properties should be paid by those property owners. With regard to the alleged
illegal connection across a neighboring property, Mr. Gebert advised he obtained the as-built drawing
from the Olympic View Water and Sewer District that indicated the connection was inspected and
accepted by an Olympic View Water and Sewer District inspector. He did not research whether the
appropriate permits had been obtained.
Councilmember Dawson proposed changing staff’s recommendation due to delays associated with this
project that were not anticipated at the time this was presented to the Council and that were no fault of the
property owners.
Packet Page 10 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 8
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR
APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 3657, TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL CONNECTION FEE IN
THE REDUCED AMOUNT OF $2,941.39.
Councilmember Dawson explained these were the direct construction costs associated with this project, it
was within the range of fees that were proposed to the property owners, and was within the amount
considered by the Council.
Councilmember Moore spoke in favor of the motion, suggesting the precedent that should be set was
communicating with residents earlier and accurately.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the real estate disclosure form included a question regarding permits
and if that did not address this situation, there was a catch-all question asking the homeowner to identify
anything a future buyer may need to know. He concluded a property owner would disclose this issue in
that manner. With regard to an installment plan, he pointed out a property owner could do their own
installment plan based on when they planned to hook up. He noted hooking up to sewer would increase
the home’s value in excess of the amount required to hook-up to sewer. He urged the Council to approve
the revised special connection fee, commenting it was good for the City and after the investment was
made, it would be good for the homeowner.
Councilmember Marin supported the motion, commenting a reduced amount was justifiable based on
additional costs incurred during the delay. However, if the stub had not been installed, the result could
have been the property owners digging up and patching the new street. He commented septic failures
were expensive and once a septic system failed, the property would need to connect to the sewer. He
acknowledged costs had escalated and the increases were difficult to predict but it was not the fault of
staff.
Council President Olson spoke in favor of the motion, finding it a good compromise. She acknowledged
the property owners would incur some costs but connecting to the sewer would increase the value of their
homes.
Councilmember Wambolt did not support the proposed special connection fee. Although he empathized
with the increased cost, the homeowners could establish their own installment plan by timing their hook
up. He noted many of the City’s bids had been significantly over the estimate due to the atypical
construction climate, not due to any fault of staff. He noted even if staff had informed the residents the
fee had increased, it would have impacted the amount of the fee.
MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT OPPOSED.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Jan Vance, Executive Director, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, commented the Taste of
Edmonds had grown over the last 25 years to be the largest community festival in Snohomish County. In
addition to food booths, arts and crafts, commercial booths, a kids’ area, beer garden and wine area, there
are also three entertainment stages. She cited facts about the Chamber and Taste, the Chamber runs the
Taste and raises all funds, they have tried unsuccessfully to involve local merchants, there is no public
funding for the Taste and the Chamber pays for City services. She explained the fundraiser pays for a
wide variety of member services made available by the Chamber and finances many other events and
provides funding to sponsor programs and services for a variety of community service organizations, over
$15,000 in the past year. She commented the Taste of Edmonds was the economic engine that made the
Packet Page 11 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 9
4th of July and other community events possible. The Taste of Edmonds this year will be held on August
10, 11 and 12.
Dave Page, Edmonds, commented on a newspaper article regarding the unruly conduct of the audience
at a Key Largo, Florida City Council meeting. Next he advised City staff was working on an Interlocal
Agreement with Shoreline, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace regarding Lake Ballinger and there were
plans for a basin study. As Lynnwood was a big contributor of untreated water into Lake Ballinger, he
noted it was important that the construction projects proposed on Hwy. 99 address wastewater
management. He advised additional information would be provided in the future and assistance requested
from the City.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled the July 17 meeting included discussion regarding the use of
Channel 21 and the 6-year TIP; however, the meeting was not televised due to poor quality of the video.
He obtained a copy of the tape and a DVD of the meeting, acknowledging the tape was poor quality;
however, the quality of the DVD was acceptable. He was concerned the citizens did not have the
opportunity to view the July 17 meeting including the Council’s discussion regarding the use of Channel
21. He questioned whether the DVD could be used to broadcast the meeting on Channel 21 if the tape
quality was unacceptable. Pointing out that the City had a problem with video quality, he urged the
Council to either fix the problem or purchase new equipment. Next, he referred to the property owners
and 33 citizens discussing redevelopment of the old Safeway site. As the project was now public, he
suggested Mayor Haakenson discontinue the non-disclosure agreement he signed regarding his
participation in discussions regarding the project.
David Thorpe, Edmonds, thanked the Council, Mayor and staff for the time and energy they devoted to
community members’ problems whether 2-3 residents or thousands. He commented Edmonds was a
unique City due to access to government, citing the ease of obtaining information at City Hall. He
commented on Forward Thrust that financed clean-up of Lake Washington as well as other projects,
noting that effort had a vision and required leadership. He acknowledged leadership was often difficult,
requiring one be rough at times, gentle at other times, and be understanding of others’ views. He urged
the Council to listen to the citizens when discussing redevelopment of neighborhood centers. He
encouraged the Council to temper growth with the environment and the health of the people who live and
work in Edmonds.
In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comments about the equipment malfunction, Council President Olson
reported a technician was hired who had fixed the problem. She explained the reason the DVD could not
be used to broadcast the meeting was because it had chapters and stopped at each chapter requiring a staff
member to restart the DVD. She advised the DVD was available for purchase at City Hall for $3.00; it
could not be given away because that would be a gift of public funds.
Councilmember Plunkett advised he requested the next Council retreat include a discussion regarding
establishing a Council policy to determine when a Council meeting would not be broadcast. Council
President Olson advised Councilmember Wambolt and she viewed the video and agreed the quality was
unacceptable. Councilmember Wambolt agreed.
6. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson advised next week’s Council meeting was committee meetings which were not
broadcast. The next Council meeting will be held on Monday, August 20 due to the primary election on
Tuesday, August 21.
Packet Page 12 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 10
Mayor Haakenson announced he planned to conduct the Economic Development Director interviews on
August 14 and had asked Council President Olson to select two Councilmembers to participate on the
interview team.
7. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Olson wished Councilmember Marin a belated Happy Birthday on July 30.
Councilmember Plunkett offered to serve on the Economic Development Director interview panel.
Councilmember Marin announced Community Transit had selected a manufacturer for the Bus Rapid
Transit buses and identified the station locations. In Edmonds, stations would be located at 238th on the
east side near Gobs of Knobs, and in front of Honey Baked Hams on the west side; at 216th near the
hospital and the thrift store; and northbound in front of Shucks at 200th and southbound at 196th in front of
the former Arco and Jimbos. He advised Community Transit was proceeding with purchasing the
required easements and had a contract in place for design/build of the stations.
Councilmember Dawson referred to the public hearing later this month on a graffiti ordinance. She
reported approximately 50 people including Edmonds staff attended Snohomish County Executive
Reardon’s graffiti summit. The summit included presentations from Snohomish County Code
Enforcement, the Sheriff’s office, she made a presentation on Snohomish County’s proposed ordinance,
Marysville made a presentation on their regulations and an organization in Seattle described their annual
paint-out event. She announced a Snohomish County graffiti paint-out event on October 6. She relayed
Marysville’s comment that if cities did not work together on the issue, the problem would be pushed from
one city to another.
With regard to the waterfront “secret” meetings, Councilmember Wambolt explained the meetings began
in early 2006 between Port Commissioner Bruce Faires and he who met a few times; they then invited
City staff and the Mayor to participate and also had discussions with the Port of Everett regarding their
redevelopment. They soon learned the private property owners needed to be involved. The property
owners set the terms of those meetings which included Mayor Haakenson signing a non-disclosure
agreement. The process has progressed to include the public and 33 citizens were selected to participate.
The group has met three times and he planned to provide each Councilmember with the information that
had been provided to the group. He noted the Port met yesterday to discuss funding the next phase,
noting there was no cost to the City in the next phase as the costs would be borne by the property owners.
He concluded the meetings with the 33 citizens were open to the public and he anticipated further
information would be available in October.
Councilmember Moore asked whether the non-disclosure agreement was still required. Councilmember
Wambolt advised only Mayor Haakenson was required to sign a non-disclosure/confidentiality
agreement. To avoid Councilmember Wambolt signing a confidentiality agreement, it was agreed if there
was anything a Councilmember should not hear because it may taint his judgment, he would leave the
room which he did not recall had ever happened. He offered to ask whether the confidentiality agreement
was now moot as they were not discussing anything confidential. Mayor Haakenson commented it was
part of his job to attend the meetings and Councilmember Wambolt agreed he needed to participate.
Councilmember Moore encouraged the Council and the public to read the minutes of the July 26
Community Services/Development Services Committee Meeting that included public comment on the
difficulties obtaining permits and ideas for improvement; she anticipated a positive outcome as a result of
the meeting. She advised Councilmember Marin planned to have staff consider the ideas posed and
Packet Page 13 of 217
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
August 7, 2007
Page 11
return to the Committee next month. Mayor Haakenson advised staff had already met twice and planned
to provide a report to the Council at their next meeting.
Councilmember Moore suggested the Council consider upgrading the cameras in Council Chambers as
the picture quality was not very good. She recalled the Council had identified funds in the budget for
cameras. Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman advised the cost to upgrade the cameras
three years ago was $15,000.
Student Representative Callahan recognized the Waste Warriors, a group of high school students who
would be picking up trash at the Taste of Edmonds.
8. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:32 p.m.
Packet Page 14 of 217
AM-1138 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Debbie Karber Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #98147 through #98320 for August 9, 2007 in the amount of
$549,630.36 and #98321 through #98470 for August 16, 2007 in the amount of $1,248,681.37.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 2007
Revenue:
Expenditure: $1,798,311.73
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $1,798,311.73
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 8-9-07
Link: Claim cks 8-16-07
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Dan Clements 08/16/2007 11:08 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 11:26 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/16/2007 11:44 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 03:29 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie Started On: 08/16/2007 10:52
Packet Page 15 of 217
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 08/16/2007 10:52
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 16 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98147 8/3/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS July DRS JULY DRS
JULY DRS
811.000.000.231.540.000.00 188,162.40
Total :188,162.40
98148 8/6/2007 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 004,316-01 SECOND QUARTER L & I
004,316-10 Labor & Industries
811.000.000.231.530.000.00 25,397.72
Total :25,397.72
98149 8/6/2007 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 004,316-02 2 SECOND QUARTER L & I
2nd Quarter L & I
811.000.000.231.530.000.00 520.05
Total :520.05
98150 8/6/2007 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 004,316-06 3 SECOND QUARTER L & I
2nd Quarter L & I
811.000.000.231.530.000.00 919.20
Total :919.20
98151 8/6/2007 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 004,316-08 9 SECOND QUARTER L & I
2nd Quarter L & I for 004,316-08 9
811.000.000.231.530.000.00 9,558.70
Total :9,558.70
98152 8/9/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070731 INV#1201641-20070731 EDMONDS PD
SEARCHES/REPORTS JULY 2007
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 14.50
Total :14.50
98153 8/9/2007 062423 ADPRO LITHO INC 07/31/2007 Newsletter (July 2007)
Newsletter (July 2007)
001.000.240.513.110.490.00 3,148.00
Total :3,148.00
98154 8/9/2007 064635 ADS EQUIPMENT INC 31487 LIFT ST 13 - SEWER DEPT - CHECK VALVE
1Page:
Packet Page 17 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98154 8/9/2007 (Continued)064635 ADS EQUIPMENT INC
LIFT ST 13 - SEWER DEPT - CHECK VALVE
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 420.00
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 45.01
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 41.39
Total :506.40
98155 8/9/2007 071820 AHBL INC 63741 MUSEUM - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
MUSEUM - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
116.000.651.519.920.410.00 510.00
Total :510.00
98156 8/9/2007 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 10144725 M5Z34
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 25.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.23
Total :27.23
98157 8/9/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 891329 UNIT 64 - FUSEHOLDER, ELECT TAPE
UNIT 64 - FUSEHOLDER, ELECT TAPE
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 25.02
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 2.23
Total :27.25
98158 8/9/2007 071821 ALL PHASE PRESSURE WASHING ALLPHASE0517 SPORT COURT CLEANING
SPORT COURT CLEANING
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,600.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 142.40
Total :1,742.40
98159 8/9/2007 060205 ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP 9144279-00 PW - SUPER ANCHORS
2Page:
Packet Page 18 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98159 8/9/2007 (Continued)060205 ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP
PW - SUPER ANCHORS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 456.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 40.58
Total :496.58
98160 8/9/2007 070254 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 442922-00 05-09452
RELAY
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 796.92
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 12.91
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 72.08
Total :881.91
98161 8/9/2007 065568 ALLWATER INC 073007107 COEWASTE
DRINKING WATER
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 30.85
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 1.42
Total :32.27
98162 8/9/2007 068330 AMERICAN PRINTING 42604 CEMETERY RACK CARDS
NEW EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY RACK CARDS
130.000.640.536.200.440.00 530.00
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.200.440.00 47.17
Total :577.17
98163 8/9/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3930956 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.04
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.93
Total :32.97
3Page:
Packet Page 19 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98164 8/9/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3930958 18386001
UNIFORM
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 93.08
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.28
Total :101.36
98165 8/9/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3930957 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
Total :36.69
98166 8/9/2007 069120 AST TRUST COMPANY 230343 MEBT 2 Check fees
MEBT 2 Check fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 30.00
Total :30.00
98167 8/9/2007 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 032132 alerton system-PW
alerton system-PW
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,541.25
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 137.17
Total :1,678.42
98168 8/9/2007 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 06-4869 BURIAL SUPPLIES
BURIAL SUPPLIES: THOMPSON
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00
BURIAL SUPPLIES: MCFARLAND
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00
BURIAL SUPPLIES: CARROLL
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 358.00
BURIAL SUPPLIES: GOODNIGHT
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 441.75
Total :1,515.75
4Page:
Packet Page 20 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98169 8/9/2007 071581 AVIDEX INDUSTRIES LLC I028692 INV#I028692 EDM003 EDMONDS PD
SHARP 20" AQUOS MONITOR
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 424.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 8.91
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 38.53
CREDIT MEMO IR000692 EDMONDS PDIR000692
CREDIT - RETURNED CEILING MOUNTG
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 -24.30
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.350.00 -2.40
Total :444.74
98170 8/9/2007 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0707 Background check service fees
Background check service fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 120.00
Total :120.00
98171 8/9/2007 071828 BAIRD, SANDRA BAIRD0801 REFUND
REFUND FOR CLASS
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 71.00
Total :71.00
98172 8/9/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9762674 Canon 5870 Copier lease (9/1 - 9/30/07)
5Page:
Packet Page 21 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98172 8/9/2007 (Continued)070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING
Canon 5870 Copier lease (9/1 - 9/30/07)
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35
Canon 5870 Copier lease (9/1 - 9/30/07)
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32
Canon 5870 Copier lease (9/1 - 9/30/07)
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33
Supplies
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01
Supplies
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00
Supplies
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99
Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 11.25
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 11.25
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.25
Total :412.75
98173 8/9/2007 002258 BENS EVER READY 19969 OPERATIONS REPAIRS
repair rig extinguisher
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 35.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 3.12
Total :38.12
98174 8/9/2007 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS 972 E5GA.Services thru 07/20/07
E5GA.Services thru 07/20/07
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 1,320.23
Total :1,320.23
98175 8/9/2007 002805 BRANCHEAU, NANCY BRANCHEAU8353 CLAY AND CRAFTS
6Page:
Packet Page 22 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98175 8/9/2007 (Continued)002805 BRANCHEAU, NANCY
CLAY EXPLORATION #8353
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 211.50
CLAY EXPLORATION #8355
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 351.00
CRAFTS EXPLORATION #8351
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 362.25
Total :924.75
98176 8/9/2007 068434 BRAUN NORTHWEST INC 9071 UNIT 487 - REPAIR
UNIT 487 - REPAIR
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 8,660.45
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 666.85
Total :9,327.30
98177 8/9/2007 071434 BRUNETTE, SISSEL BRUNETTE8363 PRENATAL FITNESS
PRENATAL FITNESS #8363
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 56.00
Total :56.00
98178 8/9/2007 066914 BUSINESS TELECOM PRODUCTS INC 181254 BATTERY REPLACEMENT KIT - HEADSET DEV.
BATTERY REPLACEMENT KIT - HEADSET DEV.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 33.64
Total :33.64
98179 8/9/2007 071829 CALKINS, JEAN CALKINS0801 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 250.00
Total :250.00
98180 8/9/2007 003320 CASCADE MACHINERY & ELECTRIC 327578 SEWER LIFT ST 13 PUMP 1 - REPAIR
SEWER LIFT ST 13 PUMP 1 - REPAIR
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 1,654.60
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 147.26
7Page:
Packet Page 23 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,801.86981808/9/2007 003320 003320 CASCADE MACHINERY & ELECTRIC
98181 8/9/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN07071023 GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.69
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BIRTHDAY BALLOONS
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 7.75
Total :8.44
98182 8/9/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY109920 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 51.92
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.82
ALS SUPPLIESLY109921
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 10.38
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 0.92
ALS SUPPLIESLY109922
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 20.77
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 1.85
ALS SUPPLIESLY109954
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 38.13
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.39
ALS SUPPLIESRN07071022
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 15.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 1.38
8Page:
Packet Page 24 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :163.56981828/9/2007 003510 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
98183 8/9/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS 871747052X08052007 DUANE BOWMAN WIRELESS SERVICE FROM
DUANE BOWMAN WIRELESS SERVICE FROM
001.000.620.558.800.420.00 9.13
ROB CHAVE CELL PHONE CHARGES871860970X08052007
ROB CHAVE CELL PHONE CHARGES
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 18.26
Total :27.39
98184 8/9/2007 064341 CINGULAR WIRELESS X08052007 OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS
vehicles' wireless
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 86.98
Total :86.98
98185 8/9/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460686169 UNIFORMS
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPS UNIFORMS460686170
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 89.44
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 7.95
UNIFORMS460687213
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 92.40
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 92.40
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.22
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.22
9Page:
Packet Page 25 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98185 8/9/2007 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
OPS UNIFORMS460687235
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 132.66
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.80
Total :493.57
98186 8/9/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1816806 FAC MAINT - SANITZERS, GLOVES, C&P
FAC MAINT - SANITZERS, GLOVES, C&P
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 124.32
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.29
Total :138.11
98187 8/9/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 7577 FISHERIES SUPPLY - UNIT 100,124,621 AND
FISHERIES SUPPLY - UNIT 100,124,621 AND
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 104.73
SEATTLE MARINA - UNIT M 16 - PAINT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 126.11
NORTHERN TOOL - FLEET - 30 GAL GAS CADDY
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 394.85
LHS LIGHTS - UNIT 189 POL - BROOKINGS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 160.43
SERVICE FEE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.00
DUNN LUMBER - UNIT EQ10FI - SUPPLIES
511.200.657.594.480.640.00 386.31
Total :1,173.43
98188 8/9/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 6805166 ACC NO 1126518
10Page:
Packet Page 26 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98188 8/9/2007 (Continued)062891 COOK PAGING WA
pagers-water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 11.85
pagers-streets~
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 5.47
pagers-storm
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 15.80
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.20
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 1.59
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 1.99
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 0.55
pagers-facilities
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 19.75
Total :58.20
98189 8/9/2007 005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE CRETIN0804 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR 8/5/07
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 180.00
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 105.00
Total :285.00
98190 8/9/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 38752 UNITS EQ01WR & EQ23FM - RADIOS AND
UNITS EQ01WR & EQ23FM - RADIOS AND
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 1,053.14
Freight
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 12.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 94.79
11Page:
Packet Page 27 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98190 8/9/2007 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
UNIT EQ01WR & EQ23FM - EXPANDED ACCY38757
UNIT EQ01WR & EQ23FM - EXPANDED ACCY
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 27.90
Freight
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 5.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 2.93
Total :1,195.76
98191 8/9/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 208-WAR045513 STORMWATER PERMIT INVOICE - ANNUAL FEE
STORMWATER PERMIT INVOICE - ANNUAL FEE
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 9,278.33
Total :9,278.33
98192 8/9/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201583524 FAC MAINT - WORK GLOVES, DEOD CAKES,
FAC MAINT - WORK GLOVES, DEOD CAKES,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 127.65
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.72
FAC MAINT - DISP GLOVES201583729
FAC MAINT - DISP GLOVES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 67.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.63
Total :211.00
98193 8/9/2007 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 2nd Qtr L & I 2ND QTR L & I
Correction to Mayor's Office L & I
811.000.000.231.530.000.00 44.14
Total :44.14
98194 8/9/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2776 INV#07-2776 EDMONDS PD
12Page:
Packet Page 28 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98194 8/9/2007 (Continued)064531 DINES, JEANNIE
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 07-2201
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 308.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 07-3038
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 44.80
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 07-2955
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 106.40
Total :459.20
98195 8/9/2007 071826 DJANGO, PEARL DJANGO0812 CITY PARK CONCERT
CITY PARK CONCERT~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,100.00
Total :1,100.00
98196 8/9/2007 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 07-1187.1 E7FA.Survey Services thru 07/15/07
E7FA.Survey Services thru 07/15/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 5,594.20
Total :5,594.20
98197 8/9/2007 071824 DUDYSHYN, ALLLA DUDYSHUN REFUND
REFUNDS FOR WINTER CLASSES
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 272.00
Total :272.00
98198 8/9/2007 007253 DUNN LUMBER 09231730 LUMBER
LUMBER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 294.60
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.22
LUMBER & SUPPLIES09232255
LUMBER & SUPPLIES
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 252.46
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 22.47
Total :595.75
98199 8/9/2007 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2007210 RONQUILLO,KOSTELYK,ED. PROF.CTR CT,
13Page:
Packet Page 29 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98199 8/9/2007 (Continued)069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS
RONQUILLO,KOSTELYK,ED. PROF.CTR CT,
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,127.23
Total :1,127.23
98200 8/9/2007 068357 EARTH TECH 92358-14-417979 E5FG.Services thru 06/29/07
E5FG.Services thru 06/29/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 11,998.13
Total :11,998.13
98201 8/9/2007 071596 EBORALL, STEVE EBORALL8498 ART CLASSES
ART DAZE #8498
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 113.75
Total :113.75
98202 8/9/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 84044 SUPPLIES
LOCK GRIP
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.89
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.70
SUPPLIES84094
CUT OFF WHEEL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 48.50
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.32
SUPPLIES84108
UNDERCOAT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.25
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.80
Total :83.46
98203 8/9/2007 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC 536680085 ID#536680085 - M. MARSH
EVALUATION/SGT.M.MARSH~
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 164.00
Total :164.00
14Page:
Packet Page 30 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98204 8/9/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 11434 UPS/CHVOND BARRY ENGR.
UPS/CHVOND BARRY ENGR.
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 16.39
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 1.46
Total :17.85
98205 8/9/2007 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 101268 INV#101268 CUST#5118 EDMONDS ANIMAL CONT
SPAY DOG - IMPOUND #7004
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 109.75
EXPLORE PRE-SPAYED DOG - IMP 6968
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 60.00
SPAY DOG - IMPOUND #6991
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 109.75
NEUTER CAT - IMPOUND #6898
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75
NEUTER CAT - IMPOUND #6933
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75
Total :369.00
98206 8/9/2007 069055 EHS INTERNATIONAL INC.24444 E5MC.Services thru 07/18/07
E5MC.Services thru 07/18/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 6,039.50
Total :6,039.50
98207 8/9/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 0266541 MK0653
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 173.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 15.42
Total :188.67
98208 8/9/2007 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT UBI 312-000-093-000 ES REF # 94513310 7
Q2-07 Unemployment Insurance
001.000.390.517.780.230.00 1,709.00
Total :1,709.00
15Page:
Packet Page 31 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98209 8/9/2007 065789 ESTES, KEN 68 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 351.55
Total :351.55
98210 8/9/2007 065958 EZ-LINER 45121 UNIT 46 - SS/HP FILTER, SUPPLIES
UNIT 46 - SS/HP FILTER, SUPPLIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,207.65
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 67.35
Total :1,275.00
98211 8/9/2007 069380 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER GANNON FBINNA 2007 TRAINING/G. GANNON - EDMONDS
REGISTRATION/GANNON~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 85.00
Total :85.00
98212 8/9/2007 067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING KING8064 ETIQUETTE CLASS
LOOKING GOOD FOR GIRLS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 225.00
Total :225.00
98213 8/9/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 97860 July 2007 - 125 plan fees
July 2007 - 125 plan fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 50.00
July 2007 - 132 plan fees plus check
811.000.000.231.590.000.00 31.80
Total :81.80
98214 8/9/2007 063341 FORCIBLE ENTRY 703 OPS UNIFORMS
gloves & eye kits
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 742.00
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 16.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 67.46
16Page:
Packet Page 32 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98214 8/9/2007 (Continued)063341 FORCIBLE ENTRY
OPS SUPPLIES704
mask bags
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 252.00
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 20.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 24.21
Total :1,121.67
98215 8/9/2007 071311 FORMS AND FILING INC 105405A INV#105405A CUST#8151 EDMONDS PD
COL'R'TAB LABELS - 0, 1, 2
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 39.00
COL'R'TAB LABELS - 40, 50, 90 SERIES
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 77.40
Freight
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 9.31
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 11.19
Total :136.90
98216 8/9/2007 071833 FRACTISOUS, MONIQUE FRACTISOUS0707 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR PLAZA ROOM
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 250.00
Total :250.00
98217 8/9/2007 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA GLEISNER8255 TAIJIQUAN CLASSES
TAIJIQUAN #8255
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 540.00
TAIJIQUAN #8251
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 445.50
Total :985.50
98218 8/9/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9410177423 SUPPLIES
17Page:
Packet Page 33 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98218 8/9/2007 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER
PAINT BRUSHES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 93.20
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.02
SUPPLIES9417233286
EAR PLUGS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 87.50
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.79
Total :196.51
98219 8/9/2007 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 07523.00-3 E7AB.Services thru 07/28/07
E7AB.Services thru 07/28/07
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 1,482.50
Total :1,482.50
98220 8/9/2007 065412 HANAUER, NANCY HANAUER8247 PRINCESS PARTY
PINT-SIZED PRINCESS PARTY #8247
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 40.50
Total :40.50
98221 8/9/2007 064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD 66 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 118.00
Total :118.00
98222 8/9/2007 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC M-246699 E4GA.Services thru 06/30/07
E4GA.Services thru 06/30/07
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 9,177.34
Total :9,177.34
98223 8/9/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 1030-88 Testing services - 3/2/07
18Page:
Packet Page 34 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98223 8/9/2007 (Continued)069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED
Testing services - 3/2/07
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 86.00
Testing services 6/15/07
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 85.00
Testing services - 6/27/07
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 50.00
Total :221.00
98224 8/9/2007 071822 HERRIN, ERICA HERRIN0730 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00
Total :500.00
98225 8/9/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1038208 6035 3225 0267 0205
TAPE, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.10
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.70
6035 3225 0267 02052046696
GASSER, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 52.83
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.70
6035 3225 0267 02053065171
BITS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.92
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.24
6035 3225 0267 02054047667
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.73
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.60
19Page:
Packet Page 35 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98225 8/9/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
6035 3225 0267 02054066280
SHARPIES, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 42.59
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.79
6035 3225 0267 02055032246
FLAT PLATES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.96
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.95
6035 3225 0267 020255047498
MISC. SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 112.39
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.00
6035 3225 0267 02056038873
ADAPTER, STRAP, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.23
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.55
6035 3225 0267 02057038690
HOLDER, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.21
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.71
6035 3225 0267 02057038706
ROLLER COVER, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.82
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.41
6035 3225 0267 02059030074
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 35.82
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.19
20Page:
Packet Page 36 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :377.44982258/9/2007 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
98226 8/9/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1091932 OPS SUPPLIES
blades & brushes
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 66.75
Total :66.75
98227 8/9/2007 071642 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 7176 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR COMPREHENSIVE
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 4,967.90
Total :4,967.90
98228 8/9/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 057883 OPS SUPPLIES
Staplers, batteries
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 117.82
Total :117.82
98229 8/9/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73894272 COPIER LEASE
PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 22.87
Total :22.87
98230 8/9/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73894262 RECEPTION COPIER RENT - DS DEPT.
RECEPTION COPIER RENT - DS DEPT.
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 99.88
LARGE COPIER RENT - DS DEPT.73894264
LARGE COPIER RENT - DS DEPT.
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,453.98
ENG. COLOR COPIER RENT73894266
ENG. COLOR COPIER RENT
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 446.63
Total :2,000.49
98231 8/9/2007 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 07-0184650 MEMBERSHIP #0184650 RENEWAL FOR JLG
MEMBERSHIP #0184650 RENEWAL FOR JLG
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 100.00
21Page:
Packet Page 37 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :100.00982318/9/2007 069349 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC
98232 8/9/2007 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC ANN BULLIS 2007 ANN BULLIS RENEWAL OF TO CERTS, BLDG
ANN BULLIS RENEWAL OF TO CERTS, BLDG
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 60.00
Total :60.00
98233 8/9/2007 070526 INTERNATIONAL TACTICAL SWAT TRAINING INSTRUCTOR FEES/SWAT TRAINING - EDMONDS
SWAT TRAINING 1/3 SHARE~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 4,000.00
Total :4,000.00
98234 8/9/2007 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH MAY/JUNE 2007 INV FOR MAY/JUNE CARWASHES EDMONDS PD
MAY CARWASHES
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 187.50
JUNE CARWASHES
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 170.00
Total :357.50
98235 8/9/2007 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0021370 810 WALNUT ST - ENVIRONMENTAL PROF SVC
810 WALNUT ST - ENVIRONMENTAL PROF SVC
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 505.50
Total :505.50
98236 8/9/2007 066873 LAWLESS, JIM 07/31/2007 Tuition Reimbursement - 1/8 thru 5/4/07
Tuition Reimbursement - 1/8 thru 5/4/07
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 1,397.00
Total :1,397.00
98237 8/9/2007 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 130307 UNIT 476 - 8 RADIAL HWY TIRES WITH
UNIT 476 - 8 RADIAL HWY TIRES WITH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4,244.32
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 385.74
Total :4,630.06
98238 8/9/2007 071831 LONG, DIANNA LONG0802 REFUND
22Page:
Packet Page 38 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98238 8/9/2007 (Continued)071831 LONG, DIANNA
CLASS REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 71.00
Total :71.00
98239 8/9/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 095129 OFFICE SUPPLIES
PRINTED ENVELOPES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 89.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 7.92
Total :96.92
98240 8/9/2007 060855 LYNNWOOD TROPHY CENTER 16681 Retirement plaques for 2 commissioners
Retirement plaques for 2 commissioners
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 65.90
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 5.87
Total :71.77
98241 8/9/2007 060855 LYNNWOOD TROPHY CENTER 16689 INV#16689 - UPDATING DEPARTMENT PLAQUES
UPDATING DEPT. PLAQUES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 64.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.70
Total :69.70
98242 8/9/2007 071834 MACFARLANE, STEPHANIE MACFARLANE0807 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR PLAZA ROOM
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00
Total :500.00
98243 8/9/2007 071140 MAD SCIENCE SCIENCE8094 MAD SCIENCE CAMP
MAD SCIENCE CAMP #8094
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,784.00
MAD SCIENCE CAMP #8095
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,197.00
23Page:
Packet Page 39 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :4,981.00982438/9/2007 071140 071140 MAD SCIENCE
98244 8/9/2007 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 44789 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 106.62
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.49
YOST POOL SUPPLIES44906
POOL VACUUM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 175.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.58
YOST POOL SUPPLIES45040
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 79.12
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.04
YOST POOL SUPPLIES45130
REAGENTS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.60
Total :412.45
98245 8/9/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 69284113 123106800
PRESSURE GAUGES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 250.67
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.70
12310680069361026
BACKER ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 251.66
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.75
24Page:
Packet Page 40 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98245 8/9/2007 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
12310680069513636
FLOAT VALVE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 124.68
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.42
Total :656.88
98246 8/9/2007 071487 MED-TECH RESOURCE INC 29531 INV#29531 EDMONDS PD
YELLOW EMERGENCY BLANKETS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 53.04
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 8.45
Total :61.49
98247 8/9/2007 071392 MEDIA BAY PRODUCTIONS LLC 2007-410 OUTDOOR MOVIE PACKAGE
COMPLETE OUTDOOR CINEMA PACKAGE
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,153.00
Total :2,153.00
98248 8/9/2007 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC 110117120 UNIT 11 - REG ASSY, CHANNEL, HANDLE,
UNIT 11 - REG ASSY, CHANNEL, HANDLE,
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 114.37
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.50
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.91
Total :137.78
98249 8/9/2007 022009 MOTOROLA INC 13550958 OPS COMMUNICATIONS
Modem, cable, etc.
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 2,163.75
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 192.57
Total :2,356.32
98250 8/9/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0318704-CM REFUND FROM DUPLICATE BILLING PMT
25Page:
Packet Page 41 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98250 8/9/2007 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
REFUND FROM DUPLICATE BILLING PMT
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -82.52
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -7.09
FLEET INVENTORY - FILTERS0341789-IN
FLEET INVENTORY - FILTERS
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 194.03
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 16.68
Total :121.10
98251 8/9/2007 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB8327 FUN FACTORY
FUN FACTORY #8327
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 690.00
Total :690.00
98252 8/9/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1632682.001 2091
FUSE BLOCK
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 403.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 34.66
Total :437.66
98253 8/9/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0529297 DAMAGED HONEY BUCKET
DAMAGE TO UNIT @ MADRONA ELEMENTARY
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 850.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 75.65
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0530630
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02
Total :1,023.67
98254 8/9/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 492 7/25/07 PLANNING BOARD MINUTE TAKER.
26Page:
Packet Page 42 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98254 8/9/2007 (Continued)025690 NOYES, KARIN
7/25/07 PLANNING BOARD MINUTE TAKER.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 390.00
HISTORIC PRES 7/12/07 & PLANNING BOARD000 00 493
HISTORIC PRES 7/12/07 & PLANNING BOARD
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 300.00
Total :690.00
98255 8/9/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 513090 OFFICE SUPPLIES
LAMINATOR, BANDAIDS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 184.83
INK FOR DAYCAMP PRINTER
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 34.32
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 16.45
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 3.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES561982
CLOCK, CLIPS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 40.02
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.20
OFFICE SUPPLIES644270
TONER & FAX CARTRIDGES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 133.48
POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.510.310.00 62.92
MISC. PAPER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 214.34
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.88
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.510.310.00 5.60
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 19.07
27Page:
Packet Page 43 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98255 8/9/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES696848
GLOVES, TAPE FOR DISCOVERY PROGRAM
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 12.33
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 0.74
Total :742.23
98256 8/9/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 007015 MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES.
MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 571.31
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 50.86
2-DRAWER FILE CAB. FOR MICHAEL CLUGSTON.565074
2-DRAWER FILE CAB. FOR MICHAEL CLUGSTON.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 251.79
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 22.42
DAF8 DRAFTING FILM -BACK ORDER.816037
DAF8 DRAFTING FILM -BACK ORDER.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 329.19
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 29.30
Total :1,254.87
98257 8/9/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 033868 INV#033868 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
28Page:
Packet Page 44 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98257 8/9/2007 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC
10 DOZEN FLEXGRIP PENS - PATROL
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 82.80
SMALL BINDER CLIPS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.12
JUMBO PAPER CLIPS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.02
HANGING FILE WALL SYSTEM
104.000.410.521.210.310.00 59.03
PARTITION HANGERS-FILE SYSTEM
104.000.410.521.210.310.00 12.53
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.62
Sales Tax
104.000.410.521.210.310.00 6.37
Total :183.49
98258 8/9/2007 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER June 2007 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,037.19
PSEA 1 ,2 , 3Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 22,575.09
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 341.00
State Patrol Death Investigations
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 493.12
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 3,350.15
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 165.30
Total :27,961.85
98259 8/9/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 WATER
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 192.30
29Page:
Packet Page 45 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :192.30982598/9/2007 026200 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT
98260 8/9/2007 063750 ORCA PACIFIC 029693 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 219.44
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.53
YOST POOL CHEMICALS029841
YOST POOL CHEMICALS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 447.32
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.82
Total :726.11
98261 8/9/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00046540 UNIT 31 - DEBRIS HOSE, HOSE END,
UNIT 31 - DEBRIS HOSE, HOSE END,
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 808.56
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 62.05
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 77.48
Total :948.09
98262 8/9/2007 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP CAMPCASH0806 DAYCAMP PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT FOR DAYCAMP PETTY CASH
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 434.56
Total :434.56
98263 8/9/2007 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD AUGUST PETTY CASH AUGUST PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
30Page:
Packet Page 46 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98263 8/9/2007 (Continued)008400 PETTY CASH - EPD
BALLOONS/EDMONDS NIGHT OUT~
001.000.410.521.300.310.00 7.12
BATTERIES/MCGRUFF~
001.000.410.521.300.310.00 7.05
PARKING/GRAFFITI MTG
001.000.410.521.100.430.00 5.00
CAKE/BINKLEY FAREWELL
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.99
COOKIES/POLICE FOUNDATION MTG~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.98
CAKE/APT. MGR ASSOC. MTG~
001.000.410.521.300.310.00 11.98
FOOD HANDLERS PERMIT/GANNON~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00
COFFEE MATE/HOSTING MEETINGS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.49
COOKIES/PUBLIC SAFETY TECHNOLOGY MEETING
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.98
SUNGLASSES/MC OFFICER FALK
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 49.01
COOKIES/POLICE FOUNDATION MTG~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.00
FERRY FEES/WSP TRAINING/FALK
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 6.25
AA BATTERIES/DEPARTMENT
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 31.24
PARKING/HARBORVIEW-COMPAAN
001.000.410.521.100.430.00 6.00
POSTAGE CERTIFIED MAIL/GUTHRIE
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 8.34
PARKING/STERN~
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 2.00
KEYS MADE/TRAFFIC CABINET
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 4.90
31Page:
Packet Page 47 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98263 8/9/2007 (Continued)008400 PETTY CASH - EPD
UNIFORM CLEANING/SGT.SMITH
001.000.410.521.110.410.00 11.98
PARKING/COMPAAN~
001.000.410.521.100.430.00 5.00
POSTAGE/CEILING MOUNTS~
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 7.20
VARIETY MUFFINS/HOSTING TRAINING~
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 5.99
COOKIES/POLICE FOUNDATION MTG~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.33
COFFEE/ROLLS/MUFFINS~
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 58.07
FUEL/K9 3/MCCLURE~
001.000.410.521.400.320.00 37.05
PARKING/GANNON~
001.000.410.521.100.430.00 11.00
FUEL/YAKIMA CONFERENCE-GANNON
001.000.410.521.400.320.00 20.00
STAPLER & STAPLES/RANGE
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 19.51
FUEL/OFFICER LEE~
001.000.410.521.400.320.00 10.00
Total :383.46
98264 8/9/2007 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 157331 INV#157331 CUST#2772 EDMONDS PD
RETURN GUN RACK TO MAKER
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 28.85
Total :28.85
98265 8/9/2007 070979 PRECISION EARTHWORKS, INC E5MD.Ret Release E5MD.Retainage Release
E5MD.Retainage Release
132.000.640.594.760.650.00 11,309.32
Total :11,309.32
98266 8/9/2007 065021 PRINTING PLUS 62247 WRITE ON THE SOUND BROCHURES
32Page:
Packet Page 48 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98266 8/9/2007 (Continued)065021 PRINTING PLUS
WRITE ON THE SOUND 2007~
123.000.640.573.100.490.00 2,394.83
Sales Tax
123.000.640.573.100.490.00 213.14
WOTS POSTERS62366
WRITE ON THE SOUND POSTERS
123.000.640.573.100.490.00 132.32
Sales Tax
123.000.640.573.100.490.00 11.78
Total :2,752.07
98267 8/9/2007 071559 PUBLIC SAFETY SELECTION PC 984 Post COE Evaluations
Post COE Evaluations
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 1,050.00
Total :1,050.00
98268 8/9/2007 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 2007-1774 April - June 2007 fees (PD)
April - June 2007 fees (PD)
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 700.00
April - June 2007 fees (Fire)
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 902.00
Total :1,602.00
98269 8/9/2007 065579 QUIKSIGN 55861 S-07-52 ZIMMERLUND
S-07-52 ZIMMERLUND
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 156.00
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 13.88
MICHEL S-07-50.55870
MICHEL S-07-50.
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 156.00
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 13.88
Total :339.76
33Page:
Packet Page 49 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98270 8/9/2007 071696 RANKINS, KATE RANKINS0803 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 40.00
Total :40.00
98271 8/9/2007 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0707112-113 E5MC.Services thru 07/13/07
E5MC.Services thru 07/13/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 3,128.34
E2FA.Services thru 07/27/070707167
E2FA.Services thru 07/27/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,770.00
E5GA.Services thru 07/27/07
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 1,935.00
Total :6,833.34
98272 8/9/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9413362651 WATER - ASPHALT
WATER - ASPHALT
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 60.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.34
Total :65.34
98273 8/9/2007 071825 ROAD CONSTRUCTION NW, INC E1CC.Pmt 1 E1CC.Services thru 07/31/07
E1CC.Services thru 07/31/07
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 98,445.11
E1CC.Retainage 1
412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -4,922.26
Total :93,522.85
98274 8/9/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 07/30/07 INV FOR JULY 2007 - EDMONDS ANIMAL CONT
DISPOSE OF 3 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 58.50
DISPOSE OF 5 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 48.75
DISPOSE OF 6 ANIMAL CARCASSES
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 58.50
34Page:
Packet Page 50 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :165.75982748/9/2007 071467 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY
98275 8/9/2007 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 117651 ALS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
boot savers
001.000.510.526.100.250.00 108.00
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.250.00 5.99
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.250.00 10.15
Total :124.14
98276 8/9/2007 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-172327 UNIT 476 - INNER NUT
UNIT 476 - INNER NUT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.30
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.92
UNIT 85 - 7.5 TON DRAWBAR1-602245
UNIT 85 - 7.5 TON DRAWBAR
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 54.41
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.68
UNIT 476 - STUD, NUT, VOYAGER SEAL19-019590
UNIT 476 - STUD, NUT, VOYAGER SEAL
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 106.76
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.18
UNIT 476 - NUTS, INNER NUTS, STUDS19-019594
UNIT 476 - NUTS, INNER NUTS, STUDS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 64.70
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.56
Total :269.51
98277 8/9/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 262299 GARDENING SUPPLIES
35Page:
Packet Page 51 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98277 8/9/2007 (Continued)036955 SKY NURSERY
ANNUALS, PERENNIALS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 148.83
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.25
GARDEN SUPPLIES262880
PERENNIALS, GROUNDCOVER, ETC.
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 194.46
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 17.31
Total :373.85
98278 8/9/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 262984 WATER - 3 WAY SOIL
WATER - 3 WAY SOIL
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 39.94
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.55
Total :43.49
98279 8/9/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014260
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74
Total :59.48
98280 8/9/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 394019584 463-001-867-1
9805 EDMONDS WAY/WESTGATE
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.52
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.71
Total :30.23
98281 8/9/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3050047152 SIGNAL LIGHT
36Page:
Packet Page 52 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98281 8/9/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 164.78
TRAFFIC SIGNAL4510017488
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74
STREET LIGHTING6000013000
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 8,448.65
STREET LIGHTING6100013009
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,944.24
STREET LIGHTING6100013306
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 170.07
STREET LIGHTING6200013008
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,814.76
Total :18,572.24
98282 8/9/2007 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 396 OPS PROF SERVICES
New field added to WebFirs
001.000.510.522.200.410.00 600.00
Total :600.00
98283 8/9/2007 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 49045 DUMP SERVICES
DUMP SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 773.00
DUMP SERVICES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 74.00
DUMP SERVICES
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 60.00
Total :907.00
98284 8/9/2007 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER JUNE 2007 crime victims-june 2007
37Page:
Packet Page 53 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98284 8/9/2007 (Continued)070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER
crime victims-june 2007
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 690.70
Total :690.70
98285 8/9/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/0731 DISPOSAL SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE DISPOSAL SERVICES~
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 576.16
Total :576.16
98286 8/9/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS
garbage & recycle for PS
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 487.49
garbage & recycle for FAC03585
garbage & recycle for FAC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.90
garbage & recycle for Library03586
garbage & recycle for Library
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 491.20
garbage & recycle-City Hall03588
garbage & recycle-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 379.46
Total :1,915.05
98287 8/9/2007 070677 SPRINT Eng.July 2007 Engineering Nextel thru 07/24/07
Engineering Nextel thru 07/24/07
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 734.36
Total :734.36
98288 8/9/2007 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 69528 E7CA.Roberts thru 07/14/07
E7CA.Roberts thru 07/14/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 195.00
E7CA.Roberts thru 07/21/0769767
E7CA.Roberts thru 07/21/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 3,575.00
38Page:
Packet Page 54 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98288 8/9/2007 (Continued)069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC
E7CA.Roberts thru 07/28/0770050
E7CA.Roberts thru 07/28/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 2,080.00
Total :5,850.00
98289 8/9/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2586242 UNIT EQ01WR
UNIT EQ01WR
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 455.40
Freight
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 24.84
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 41.30
Total :521.54
98290 8/9/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 108978 UNIT EQ01WR - ELECT SUPPLIES
UNIT EQ01WR - ELECT SUPPLIES
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 75.58
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 6.73
IT & FAC MAINT - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES114778
IT & FAC MAINT - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 181.73
IT & FAC MAINT - ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 121.15
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.18
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 10.78
Total :412.15
98291 8/9/2007 071827 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC RG 1100401 OUTDOOR MOVIE
39Page:
Packet Page 55 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98291 8/9/2007 (Continued)071827 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC
OUTDOOR MOVIE @ ANDERSON CENTER:~
001.000.640.574.200.450.00 350.00
Freight
001.000.640.574.200.450.00 21.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.200.450.00 32.65
Total :403.65
98292 8/9/2007 068619 SWENSON, LINDA 1158 FALL CRAZE DESIGN
SEPT - DEC (FALL)~
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 1,177.00
Total :1,177.00
98293 8/9/2007 071577 TAYLOR, KATHLEEN 1010 7/23-8/3/07 PLANNING CONSULTANT
7/23-8/3/07 PLANNING CONSULTANT
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 1,657.50
Total :1,657.50
98294 8/9/2007 071666 TETRA TECH CONSTRUCTION SERVIC 50092760 CITY HALL - GENERAL CIRCUIT
CITY HALL - GENERAL CIRCUIT
116.000.651.519.920.410.00 2,833.40
Total :2,833.40
98295 8/9/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 7/31/07 Gymastics Coach, #07-30 ad
Gymastics Coach, #07-30 ad
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 30.64
Total :30.64
98296 8/9/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1520520 NEWSPAPER AD
Council & Plann. Brd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,784.12
Total :1,784.12
98297 8/9/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1521215 SUTLOVICH CU-07-49
SUTLOVICH CU-07-49
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 23.04
40Page:
Packet Page 56 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98297 8/9/2007 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
EMERALD PACIFIC HOMES PRD-07-20 & 21.1521905
EMERALD PACIFIC HOMES PRD-07-20 & 21.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 23.04
MICHEL 2-07-50 LEGAL ADVERTISING.1524229
MICHEL 2-07-50 LEGAL ADVERTISING.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 15.84
Total :61.92
98298 8/9/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 8/2/07 Gymastics Coach, #07-30 ad
Gymastics Coach, #07-30 ad
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 295.14
Total :295.14
98299 8/9/2007 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES 6/30/07 MEBT services for June 2007
MEBT services for June 2007
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 27.58
MEBT services through July 20077/31/07
MEBT services through July 2007
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 133.73
Total :161.31
98300 8/9/2007 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 13514 UNIT EQ01WR - KEYS AND TAGS
UNIT EQ01WR - KEYS AND TAGS
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 11.20
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.310.00 1.00
Total :12.20
98301 8/9/2007 042750 TRIBUZIO, WALLACE 67 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 210.09
Total :210.09
98302 8/9/2007 071590 TRT LCC 5 JULY 2007 HEARING EX. SERVICES.
JULY 2007 HEARING EX. SERVICES.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,622.64
41Page:
Packet Page 57 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,622.64983028/9/2007 071590 071590 TRT LCC
98303 8/9/2007 070774 ULINE INC 19553125 INV#19553125 CUST#2634605 EDMONDS PD
SCRUBS IN A BUCKET
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 84.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 10.55
Total :94.55
98304 8/9/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7553097 WATER INVENTORY - ~
WATER INVENTORY - ~
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 61.02
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 5.19
Total :66.21
98305 8/9/2007 071823 VAN DEUREN, MAGGIE VANDEUREN0731 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT PLUS $105 FOR
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 605.00
Total :605.00
98306 8/9/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 46.46
EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY425-771-4741
EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 54.70
Total :101.16
98307 8/9/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE
FS #16-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 53.62
Total :53.62
98308 8/9/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-673-5978 LIFT STATION #1
Lift Station #1
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 50.60
42Page:
Packet Page 58 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98308 8/9/2007 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
FS # 16425-771-0158
FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 247.04
Total :297.64
98309 8/9/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0574258457 CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION
CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 2.97
Total :2.97
98310 8/9/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 31167884 1066294
BUFFER/SCISSORS
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 44.37
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 3.93
Total :48.30
98311 8/9/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 31229018 INV#31229018 CUST#1188339 EDMONDS PD
VWR SUPPORT SYSTEM BASE
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 174.11
Freight
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 7.23
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 16.14
Total :197.48
98312 8/9/2007 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH FX00056126 INV# FX00056126 EDMONDS PD - DAWSON
ANNUAL PENTOBARBITAL PERMIT
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 40.00
Total :40.00
98313 8/9/2007 070264 WASHINGTON OAKES RETIREMENT 69 Assisted Living Care - Jim Martin
Assisted Living Care - Jim Martin
009.000.390.517.370.290.00 3,850.00
Total :3,850.00
43Page:
Packet Page 59 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98314 8/9/2007 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 0764942-2677-2 202-0001256-2677-0
ASH DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.474.65 2,866.86
Total :2,866.86
98315 8/9/2007 068227 WCFA 274 CONVENTION REGISTRATION
CONVENTION REGISTRATION FOR CLIFF EDWARD
130.000.640.536.200.490.00 275.00
Total :275.00
98316 8/9/2007 047960 WEAN, GREG 65 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 251.15
Total :251.15
98317 8/9/2007 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 814109937 CODE UPDATE
RCW Update
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 142.50
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 12.68
Total :155.18
98318 8/9/2007 063074 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT 794457 UNIT 3 - WASHERS AND NUTS
UNIT 3 - WASHERS AND NUTS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.74
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.22
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.46
Total :31.42
98319 8/9/2007 064234 WILDWATER RIVER TOURS INC AMUNDSON8081 RIVER RAFTING
SKAGIT RIVER RAFTING #8081
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 108.72
Total :108.72
98320 8/9/2007 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 224 UMPIRING
44Page:
Packet Page 60 of 217
08/08/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
4:01:58PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98320 8/9/2007 (Continued)064213 WSSUA TREASURER
MEN'S AND CO-ED UMPIRING
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 3,024.00
Total :3,024.00
Bank total :549,630.36174 Vouchers for bank code :front
549,630.36Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report174
45Page:
Packet Page 61 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98321 8/16/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 243765 RODENT CONTROL
RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 92.56
Total :92.56
98322 8/16/2007 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 0807529 DAYCAMP T-SHIRTS
DAYCAMP T-SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 162.44
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 14.46
Total :176.90
98323 8/16/2007 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101456939 M5Z34
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 46.97
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 4.18
Total :51.15
98324 8/16/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8316 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR
411.000.654.534.800.340.00 161,574.95
Total :161,574.95
98325 8/16/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 110426531 FLEET INVENTORY - BATTERIES
FLEET INVENTORY - BATTERIES
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 123.90
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 11.03
Total :134.93
98326 8/16/2007 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 197-0800478 INVOICE 0197-000866034
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 84.34
1Page:
Packet Page 62 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98326 8/16/2007 (Continued)061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES
INVOICE 0197-000866129197-0800897
Public Works Facility
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.69
Public Works Facility
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 78.62
Public Works Facility
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 78.62
Public Works Facility
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 78.62
Public Works Facility
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 78.62
Public Works Facility
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 78.63
INVOICE # 0197-000866200197-0801132
garbage for F/S #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 94.02
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 7.49
INVOICE # 0197-000866950197-0829729
garbage for MCC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 47.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 5.11
Total :652.26
98327 8/16/2007 071258 ALLMAN, KEN 4-28500 RE: 4-0606-156 UTILITY REFUND
4-0606-156 UB Refund 4-28500
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 37.21
Total :37.21
98328 8/16/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3935609 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.01
2Page:
Packet Page 63 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :36.77983288/16/2007 069751 069751 ARAMARK
98329 8/16/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3935611 18386001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.54
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.24
Total :100.78
98330 8/16/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3929541 STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29
FLEET UNIFORM SVC512-3934279
FLEET UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 17.40
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.55
3Page:
Packet Page 64 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98330 8/16/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS512-3934280
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC512-3934281
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24
STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29
4Page:
Packet Page 65 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98330 8/16/2007 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-3935610
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 33.69
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.00
Total :99.82
98331 8/16/2007 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM
PARKS FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 41.17
Total :41.17
98332 8/16/2007 064341 AT&T MOBILITY X08072007 Wireless Service 6/28-7/27/07 Admin
Wireless Service 6/28-7/27/07 Admin
001.000.310.514.100.420.00 123.08
Total :123.08
98333 8/16/2007 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 871964442X08052007 871964442
PLANT CELL PONES
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 18.49
Total :18.49
98334 8/16/2007 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 206-369-4557 CELL PHONE FLEET
cell phone fleet~
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 7.14
Total :7.14
98335 8/16/2007 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 67771 TENNIS AWARDS
AWARDS FOR TENNIS TEAM
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 109.50
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 9.75
Total :119.25
98336 8/16/2007 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 354004 FLEET INVENTORY- B KITS
5Page:
Packet Page 66 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98336 8/16/2007 (Continued)028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC
FLEET INVENTORY- B KITS
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 245.50
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 21.85
FLEET INVENTORY - ROTOR A, B KIT354495
FLEET INVENTORY - ROTOR A, B KIT
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 252.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 22.52
Total :542.85
98337 8/16/2007 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 070815COE WEB SITE MAINTENANCE
Aug 07 Web Site Maintenance
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 300.00
June 07 Web Site Maintenance 070615 COE
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 271.00
July 07 Web Site Maintenance 070715 COE
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 300.00
Total :871.00
98338 8/16/2007 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 206 Prof Serv Bitco - DSD
Prof Serv Bitco - DSD
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 204.25
Total :204.25
98339 8/16/2007 068434 BRAUN NORTHWEST INC 9061 UNIT 491 - HOOK-IV
UNIT 491 - HOOK-IV
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.68
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.98
Total :55.66
98340 8/16/2007 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC IL09888 UNIT 91 - ROLLER
6Page:
Packet Page 67 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98340 8/16/2007 (Continued)002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC
UNIT 91 - ROLLER
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 638.83
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.50
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 55.55
Total :716.88
98341 8/16/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1459672 C-161
C-161 SCREENING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 3,807.47
Total :3,807.47
98342 8/16/2007 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 279545 STREET - ROCK AND SAND
STREET - ROCK AND SAND
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 2,691.48
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 204.55
Total :2,896.03
98343 8/16/2007 068975 BUSINESS RADIO LICENSING WPMN470 RADIO LICENSE
RADIO LICENSE
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 110.00
Total :110.00
98344 8/16/2007 066914 BUSINESS TELECOM PRODUCTS INC 181349 Phone in use light - DSD
Phone in use light - DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 13.02
Total :13.02
98345 8/16/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN07071025 2954000
ARGON/NITROGEN/OXYGEN
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 31.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.76
7Page:
Packet Page 68 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :33.76983458/16/2007 003510 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
98346 8/16/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN07071021 SHOP - OXYGEN
SHOP - OXYGEN
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 7.75
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.450.00 0.69
Total :8.44
98347 8/16/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460691286 UNIFORMS
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12
OPS UNIFORMS460691287
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 89.44
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 7.95
UNIFORMS460692310
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 92.40
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 92.40
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.22
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.22
OPS UNIFORMS460692329
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 132.66
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.80
Total :493.57
98348 8/16/2007 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I07002021 WATER DEPT - LBA SAMPLE ANALYSIS
8Page:
Packet Page 69 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98348 8/16/2007 (Continued)063902 CITY OF EVERETT
WATER DEPT - LBA SAMPLE ANALYSIS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 1,474.20
Total :1,474.20
98349 8/16/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5478 FALL CRAZE MAILING
EDMONDS' PORTION OF POSTAGE FOR FALL
001.000.640.574.200.420.00 4,678.08
Total :4,678.08
98350 8/16/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5481 TRAINING MISC
Rescue drill supplies; split w/So.Co.
001.000.510.522.400.310.00 57.79
Total :57.79
98351 8/16/2007 070231 CNR INC 11236 AUG 07 MAINT PHONE SYSTEM
Aug 07 Phone Maintenance
001.000.390.528.800.480.00 736.67
Sales Tax
001.000.390.528.800.480.00 65.56
Labor changes to Parks & PD phone51310
Labor changes to Parks & PD phone
001.000.640.574.100.480.00 100.00
Labor changes to Parks & PD phone
001.000.410.521.110.480.00 100.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.480.00 8.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.480.00 8.90
Labor; phone corrections FD51346
Labor; phone corrections FD
001.000.390.528.800.480.00 150.00
Sales Tax
001.000.390.528.800.480.00 13.35
Total :1,183.38
9Page:
Packet Page 70 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98352 8/16/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1805318-1 FAC MAINT - APRON FOODSRV DISP
FAC MAINT - APRON FOODSRV DISP
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.84
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.37
FAC MAINT- TOILET CL - C&P LABELSW1816806-1
FAC MAINT- TOILET CL - C&P LABELS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.50
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.27
Total :19.98
98353 8/16/2007 068473 COMMERCIAL SOUND & COMM.028959 Troubleshoot & Repair Council Video
Troubleshoot & Repair Council Video
001.000.110.511.100.410.00 897.62
Total :897.62
98354 8/16/2007 063507 COXLEY, BRUCE 060607 PHOTOGRAPHY FOR TOURISM BROCHURE
Photography fees for tourism brochure
120.000.310.575.420.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
98355 8/16/2007 068190 DATEC INC 20174 UNIT 491 - RAIDO
UNIT 491 - RAIDO
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 509.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 45.31
Total :554.31
98356 8/16/2007 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2008-BA0024058 BA0024058
BIOSOLIDS PERMIT
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 600.00
10Page:
Packet Page 71 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :600.00983568/16/2007 006626 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY
98357 8/16/2007 071836 DMI DRILLING CONSTRUCTION Bus Lic Ref REFUND OVERPMT OF BUS LIC
Refund overpmt of Business Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
98358 8/16/2007 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 07-1187.2 E7FA.Services thru 07/29/07
E7FA.Services thru 07/29/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 484.80
Total :484.80
98359 8/16/2007 071842 EATON ELECTRICAL INC 24362027 208525
C-275 SWITCHGEAR IMPROVEMENTS
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 61,864.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 5,505.89
Total :67,369.89
98360 8/16/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 84491 SUPPLIES
UNDERCOAT, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.95
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.93
Total :35.88
98361 8/16/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 83794 UNIT 91 - BEARING
UNIT 91 - BEARING
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 116.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.12
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.22
11Page:
Packet Page 72 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98361 8/16/2007 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
FAC MAINT SHOP STOCK - LPS-184125
FAC MAINT SHOP STOCK - LPS-1
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.98
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.13
Total :163.45
98362 8/16/2007 071719 EDNETICS INC 43127 CISCO FAN TRAY FOR FIBER NETWORK PROJ
Cisco fan tray for Fiber Networking
001.000.310.594.180.640.00 290.00
Sales Tax
001.000.310.594.180.640.00 25.81
Total :315.81
98363 8/16/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 24391A 1 Toner for FAX - DSD
Toner for FAX - DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 443.22
Total :443.22
98364 8/16/2007 071636 EMERSON, MARY EMERSON0420 REPLACES VOID CK 96206
REFUND FOR CLASS
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 75.00
Total :75.00
98365 8/16/2007 067945 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 16374-RDU-07-7J INV#16374-RDI-07-7J - EDMONDS POLICE
DISCLOSURE REQUEST~
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 39.50
Total :39.50
98366 8/16/2007 071634 ESCHELON TELCOM INC 010494746 C/A 010494746
PR1-1 City Phone Service 8/11-9/10/07
001.000.390.528.800.420.00 741.42
Total :741.42
98367 8/16/2007 065958 EZ-LINER 45152 UNIT 46 - BUSHINGS, HOSE
12Page:
Packet Page 73 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98367 8/16/2007 (Continued)065958 EZ-LINER
UNIT 46 - BUSHINGS, HOSE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 163.86
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 48.74
Total :212.60
98368 8/16/2007 066909 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC 481216-00 SUPPLIES
MULTI-TOOLS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 155.70
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.99
Total :165.69
98369 8/16/2007 070013 GLASS DOCTOR 51990 UNIT 129 - TINTED BACK WINDOW
UNIT 129 - TINTED BACK WINDOW
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 225.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.03
Total :245.03
98370 8/16/2007 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 080057 UNIT 252 - 2 TIRES
UNIT 252 - 2 TIRES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 127.22
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.32
Total :138.54
98371 8/16/2007 071840 GORDON STEPHENSON & JAY YOUNG 5-08775 RE: 8109 240TH ST SW EDMONDS WA
UB Refund 8109 240th St SW Edmonds WA
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 259.93
Total :259.93
98372 8/16/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9418544004 SUPPLIES
13Page:
Packet Page 74 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98372 8/16/2007 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER
EAR MUFFS, MULTI-PLIERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 214.62
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.10
Total :233.72
98373 8/16/2007 071835 GROUND CONTACT INC Bus Lic Ref REFUND OVERPMT OF BUS LIC
Refund overpmt of Business Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
98374 8/16/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5239944 WATER QUALITY - SUPPLIES
WATER QUALITY - SUPPLIES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 452.10
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 25.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 41.98
Total :519.08
98375 8/16/2007 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 00789236 036570
WELDING ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.20
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 45.15
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.09
Total :62.44
98376 8/16/2007 071777 HARRIS, SHELLY HARRIS0705 REFUND
REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 101.00
Total :101.00
98377 8/16/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5086904 6035322500959949
14Page:
Packet Page 75 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98377 8/16/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
PAINT SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 123.28
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.97
60353225009599496573734
LIGHTS/BRUSHES/SINK PARTS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 90.52
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.06
60353225009599498040871
SPRINKLER HEAD/LUMBER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 53.10
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.73
Total :290.66
98378 8/16/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1041858 FS 17 - SUPPLIES
FS 17 - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.56
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.25
FS 17 - WEATHER STRIP, CAULK, SUPPLIES2032719
FS 17 - WEATHER STRIP, CAULK, SUPPLIES
116.000.651.519.920.310.00 41.74
Sales Tax
116.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.71
WATER - EZ LITES2065239
WATER - EZ LITES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.38
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.30
15Page:
Packet Page 76 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98378 8/16/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
WATER- BARK2067101
WATER- BARK
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.96
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.24
FAC - BRASS POPUP3030982
FAC - BRASS POPUP
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.54
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.29
FAC - ANT BAIT3031016
FAC - ANT BAIT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.80
FS 17 - WEATHER STIP, SUPPLIES3032602
FS 17 - WEATHER STIP, SUPPLIES
116.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.43
Sales Tax
116.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.22
FAC - CRATES, THREADLOCKER,3574178
FAC - CRATES, THREADLOCKER,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 41.91
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.73
PLAZA RM - TRASH CAN3592682
PLAZA RM - TRASH CAN
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.83
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.43
FS 17 - WALL REPAIR SUPPLIES5032322
FS 17 - WALL REPAIR SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.52
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.98
16Page:
Packet Page 77 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98378 8/16/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
STREET - WOOD SUPPLIES FOR SMALL5036153
STREET - WOOD SUPPLIES FOR SMALL
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 401.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 35.69
CITY PARK BLDG - BARREL BOLTS5088043
CITY PARK BLDG - BARREL BOLTS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.12
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.43
FAC MAINT - GLOVES5567559
FAC MAINT - GLOVES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.74
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.87
FS 17 - SAND, Q CRACK FILL5580673
FS 17 - SAND, Q CRACK FILL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.73
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.20
WATER - D BATTERIES580061
WATER - D BATTERIES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 27.81
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.48
UNIT 97 SEXTON TRUCK - SUPPLIES6038963
UNIT 97 SEXTON TRUCK - SUPPLIES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 133.23
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.86
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES - SCREWS6079997
FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES - SCREWS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.43
17Page:
Packet Page 78 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98378 8/16/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FAC MAINT - FACESHIELDS6591196
FAC MAINT - FACESHIELDS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 94.29
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.39
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES7033449
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 55.75
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.96
FAC - SUPPLIES7048528
FAC - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.14
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.46
LIBRARY - SINK REPAIR SUPPLIES8066724
LIBRARY - SINK REPAIR SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.46
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.82
PW - PIPE REPAIR SUPPLIES8091064
PW - PIPE REPAIR SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.10
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.63
FAC MAINT - HOSE SUPPLIES88618
FAC MAINT - HOSE SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.94
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.97
FAC MAINT SHOP - LADDER, SUPPLIES9042145
FAC MAINT SHOP - LADDER, SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 176.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.74
18Page:
Packet Page 79 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98378 8/16/2007 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
BEACH RANGERS - WALLCAP9049468
BEACH RANGERS - WALLCAP
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.83
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.94
FAC MAINT - BROOM
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.98
PS - CAMLOCK9071881
PS - CAMLOCK
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.44
FAC - THINNER, DUCT TAPE, TUBE CEMENT9099583
FAC - THINNER, DUCT TAPE, TUBE CEMENT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.45
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.20
Total :1,413.57
98379 8/16/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 17942 E5JA.Testing thru 07/28/07
E5JA.Testing thru 07/28/07
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 1,800.67
E7CA.Testing thr 07/28/0717944
E7CA.Testing thr 07/28/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 630.97
E1DB.Testing thru 07/28/0717945
E1DB.Testing thru 07/28/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 973.64
Total :3,405.28
98380 8/16/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73894269 FINANCE COPIER RENTAL
19Page:
Packet Page 80 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98380 8/16/2007 (Continued)070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Finance Copier Rental 7/22-8/21/07
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07
Additional copies 6/3-7/3/07
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 355.11
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 72.03
Total :881.21
98381 8/16/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 73961542 CANON IMAGE RUNNER 9070 LEASE
Canon Image Runner 9070 Lease~250-00161
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 950.81
Total :950.81
98382 8/16/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE 445865 UNIT 130 - FUEL FILTER WRENCH
UNIT 130 - FUEL FILTER WRENCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.69
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.04
UNIT 680 - WIPER BLADES446061
UNIT 680 - WIPER BLADES
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 68.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.05
UNIT 64 - SUPPLIES446838
UNIT 64 - SUPPLIES
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 477.32
Sales Tax
511.100.657.548.680.350.00 42.48
Total :606.58
98383 8/16/2007 067552 KING CO FINANCE & BUSINESS 47344 114939
DISPOSAL/RENTON TREATMENT PLANT
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 4,138.82
Total :4,138.82
20Page:
Packet Page 81 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98384 8/16/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 095158 LETTERHEAD
PARKS AND RECREATION LETTERHEAD
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 162.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 14.42
Total :176.42
98385 8/16/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 095245 PW LETTERHEAD FOR WATER QUALITY NOTICES
PW LETTERHEAD FOR WATER QUALITY NOTICES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 159.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.15
Total :173.15
98386 8/16/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 576996 SUPPLIES
OIL SEALS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.14
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.26
Total :15.40
98387 8/16/2007 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 4597 E5MC.Services thru 07/31/07
E5MC.Services thru 07/31/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 4,465.05
Total :4,465.05
98388 8/16/2007 071140 MAD SCIENCE MADSCIENCE8096 MAD SCIENCE CAMP
MAD SCIENCE CAMP #8096
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,740.00
Total :1,740.00
98389 8/16/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 69725918 123106800
CAP SCREW/LOCKNUT
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 55.49
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.08
21Page:
Packet Page 82 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :60.57983898/16/2007 020039 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
98390 8/16/2007 070660 MICHELS CORPORATION 07-2078 12450
C-257 CONCRETE REPAIR
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 2,120.00
Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 188.68
Total :2,308.68
98391 8/16/2007 063773 MICROFLEX 00017223 JULY 07 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 45.00
Total :45.00
98392 8/16/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 51321 STREET- CHAIN SAW IGNITION MODULE
STREET- CHAIN SAW IGNITION MODULE
111.000.653.542.710.310.00 95.10
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.710.310.00 8.46
Total :103.56
98393 8/16/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0081432 SODIUM BISULFITE
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 816.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 72.62
Total :888.62
98394 8/16/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0538381 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 360.58
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0539027
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0544710
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 398.38
22Page:
Packet Page 83 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :939.25983948/16/2007 061013 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC
98395 8/16/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 840494 OFFICE SUPPLIES
REPORT COVERS, NAME TAGS, ETC
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 98.51
Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 8.76
OFFICE SUPPLIES937491
TONER, PAPER CLIPS, PENS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 83.58
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES983144
TONER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 132.11
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.76
Total :342.15
98396 8/16/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 199853 PW COPY PAPER
PW COPY PAPER
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 203.46
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 18.10
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - FOLDERS, TABS,250081
PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - FOLDERS, TABS,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 66.41
SEWER TELEMETRY - RIBBON FOR PRINTER
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.52
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 5.91
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.03
Total :306.43
98397 8/16/2007 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 660300 ATTORNEY FEES FOR JULY 07
23Page:
Packet Page 84 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98397 8/16/2007 (Continued)025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE
July 07 for Attorney Fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 16,325.05
JULY 07 RETAINER FEES660303
July 07 Retainer fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 15,899.75
Total :32,224.80
98398 8/16/2007 063750 ORCA PACIFIC 029970 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 277.48
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 24.70
Total :302.18
98399 8/16/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00045788 UNIT 55 - ROCKER SWITCH
UNIT 55 - ROCKER SWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.76
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.05
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.10
UNTI 31 - HOSE END WELD00046581
UNTI 31 - HOSE END WELD
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 82.80
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.21
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.43
Total :153.35
98400 8/16/2007 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 315923 PW COLOR METER
Copier Maint. for PW~
001.000.650.519.910.480.00 14.77
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.480.00 1.31
24Page:
Packet Page 85 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :16.08984008/16/2007 066339 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION
98401 8/16/2007 071841 PARK, JINU PARK0810 REFUND
REFUND/EDMONDS IDOL
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 10.00
Total :10.00
98402 8/16/2007 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP CAMPCASH0815 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT TO DAYCAMP PETTY CASH
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 362.17
Total :362.17
98403 8/16/2007 062770 PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL INC 708134 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES~
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 980.00
Total :980.00
98404 8/16/2007 069690 PERFORMANCE RADIATOR 424412 UNIT 96 - RADIATOR
UNIT 96 - RADIATOR
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 220.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.58
Total :239.58
98405 8/16/2007 063890 PERFORMANCE SIGN PRODUCTS INC 43557 STREET - 30" BLACK REMOVABLE
STREET - 30" BLACK REMOVABLE
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 169.50
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 15.01
Total :189.51
98406 8/16/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 11060 Wtrfrnt Devlp Pmt #3 Waterfront Redevlp 5/31-8/1/07
Pmt #3 Waterfront Redevlp 5/31-8/1/07
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 6,087.95
25Page:
Packet Page 86 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :6,087.95984068/16/2007 029117 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS
98407 8/16/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 0003870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER
Pier Electricity for JULY 07
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 11.08
Stromwater Rent & Leasehold tax~
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 472.83
UNIT F1 B1 FUEL04371
Fire Boat - Fuel
511.000.657.548.680.320.00 581.31
SERVICE FEE
511.000.657.548.680.320.00 10.00
Total :1,075.22
98408 8/16/2007 070257 POSTINI INC 339589 INTERNET ANTI-VIRUS & SPAM MAINT FEE
Aug 07 Internet Anti-Virus & Spam Maint
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 481.54
Total :481.54
98409 8/16/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL
24 hour alarm monitoring-CH~
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00
Total :35.00
98410 8/16/2007 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 79655 INSCRIPTION
INSCRIPTION: BECKER
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 84.00
INSCRIPTION79870
INSCRIPTION: BRENA
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 75.00
INSCRIPTION79871
INSCRIPTION: HENRY
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 78.00
INSCRIPTION79872
INSCRIPTION: SOLA
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 80.00
26Page:
Packet Page 87 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :317.00984108/16/2007 030780 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
98411 8/16/2007 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 FLOW METERING STATIONS
FLOW METERING STATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.82
Total :137.82
98412 8/16/2007 063452 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 344280 FS 16 - BATTERIES FOR GARAGE DOOR
FS 16 - BATTERIES FOR GARAGE DOOR
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 44.90
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.00
Total :48.90
98413 8/16/2007 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL 3004063-G STORM - SWEEP DUMP FEES
STORM - SWEEP DUMP FEES
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 1,784.81
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 64.25
Total :1,849.06
98414 8/16/2007 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0608009 E1CC.services thru 05/20/06
E1CC.services thru 05/20/06
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 16,688.52
E1CC.Services thru 06/22/070707001
E1CC.Services thru 06/22/07
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 448.71
Burnstead Traffic Engrng review0708014
Burnstead Traffic Engrng review
001.000.620.532.200.410.00 2,809.50
Total :19,946.73
98415 8/16/2007 068483 RH2 ENGINEERING INC 45488 E3JC.Services thru 07/29/07
E3JC.Services thru 07/29/07
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 5,119.10
Total :5,119.10
27Page:
Packet Page 88 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98416 8/16/2007 065784 RUDD COMPANY INC INV-049090 STREET - BIG TRUCK PAINT MACHINE
STREET - BIG TRUCK PAINT MACHINE
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 755.65
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 67.26
STREET - TIPS FOR SMALL PAINT MACHINEINV-049092
STREET - TIPS FOR SMALL PAINT MACHINE
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 84.30
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 7.50
STREET - SPRAY PAINT GUN KIT AND TRIGGERINV-049098
STREET - SPRAY PAINT GUN KIT AND TRIGGER
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 82.95
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 34.16
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 10.42
Total :1,042.24
98417 8/16/2007 071837 RW RHINE INC E5MC.Demo 1 INV #13858/E5MC.DEMO.PMT 1 THRU 08/10/07
E5MC.Demo.Payment 1 thru 08/10/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 118,783.49
E5MC.Demo Retainage 1
125.000.000.223.400.000.00 -5,453.79
Total :113,329.70
98418 8/16/2007 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 03-882339 UNIT 998 - OIL SEALS, PAD KIT
UNIT 998 - OIL SEALS, PAD KIT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 36.50
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.25
UNIT 998 - FRONT ROTOR03-882437
UNIT 998 - FRONT ROTOR
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 123.60
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.00
28Page:
Packet Page 89 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98418 8/16/2007 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
SHOP INVENTORY - SCREEN ASSEMBLY03-882750
SHOP INVENTORY - SCREEN ASSEMBLY
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 119.28
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 10.62
Total :304.25
98419 8/16/2007 069219 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES COR 2192054 043133501
RENTAL DI TANKS
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 539.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 48.01
Total :587.51
98420 8/16/2007 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-172510 UNIT 476- STAINLESS STR HOSE, 180DEGREE
UNIT 476- STAINLESS STR HOSE, 180DEGREE
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 231.28
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.79
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.99
Total :265.06
98421 8/16/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 263037 BEAUTIFICATION SUPPLIES
PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, ETC.
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 198.37
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 17.65
BEAUTIFICATION SUPPLIES263101
PLANTS, ETC.
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 247.34
Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 22.01
Total :485.37
29Page:
Packet Page 90 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98422 8/16/2007 071838 SMITH, RICHARD T R.T.SMITH CLAIM FOR EXPENSES - RT SMITH
CAB FARE/OFFICER R.T.SMITH~
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 90.00
Total :90.00
98423 8/16/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 5320018384 SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD
SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74
Total :29.74
98424 8/16/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 692025433 206-001-485-5
24400 HIGHWAY 99/RICHMOND PARK
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 26.68
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.60
620-001-500-3754018915
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 6.70
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.40
463-001-671-7852005818
8421 244TH ST SW/RICHMOND PARK
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 26.68
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.60
Total :63.66
98425 8/16/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2470018124 SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 37.73
SIGNAL LIGHT2880012519
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 34.52
BLINKING LIGHT3970013599
BLINKING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74
30Page:
Packet Page 91 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98425 8/16/2007 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
LIFT STATION #134010023721
LIFT STATION #13
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 140.31
TELEMETRY SYSTEM4640017416
TELEMETRY SYSTEM
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 26.68
SIGNAL LIGHT5380011832
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74
TRAFFIC LIGHT5450016042
TRAFFIC LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 136.68
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS5470012336
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74
Total :465.14
98426 8/16/2007 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT C000106 ACCT ID #C000106 - EDMONDS
HEP B
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 67.00
Total :67.00
98427 8/16/2007 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT C000106 FAC MAINT - HEP A/B / REF- AR135181
FAC MAINT - HEP A/B
001.000.651.519.920.410.00 83.00
Total :83.00
98428 8/16/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC Aug-07 08/07 RECREATION SERVIES CONTRACT FEE
08/07 Recreation Servies Contract Fee
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67
Total :4,791.67
98429 8/16/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING
31Page:
Packet Page 92 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98429 8/16/2007 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40
Total :24.78
98430 8/16/2007 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 77231 E7CA.Roberts thru 08/04/07
E7CA.Roberts thru 08/04/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 2,990.00
Total :2,990.00
98431 8/16/2007 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L66245 Audit Fees July 07
Audit Fees July 07
001.000.390.519.900.510.00 896.04
Audit Fees July 07
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 37.34
Audit Fees July 07
411.000.654.534.800.510.00 149.34
Audit Fees July 07
411.000.655.535.800.510.00 149.34
Audit Fees July 07
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 149.34
Audit Fees July 07
111.000.653.543.300.510.00 37.34
Audit Fees July 07
511.000.657.548.680.510.00 74.66
Total :1,493.40
98432 8/16/2007 031060 STEARNS FINANCIAL SERVICES 7099300-IN RADIX MONTHLY MAINT SEPT 07
RADIX MONTHLY MAINT SEPT 07
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 166.28
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 14.81
Total :181.09
32Page:
Packet Page 93 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98433 8/16/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2583368 SEWER - RETURNED HOOK CLEVIS GRABS
SEWER - RETURNED HOOK CLEVIS GRABS
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -25.29
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -2.17
WATER/SEWER - RESPIRATOR CLEANING PADS,2584334
WATER/SEWER - RESPIRATOR CLEANING PADS,
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 30.15
WATER/SEWER - RESPIRATOR CLEANING PADS,
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 30.15
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.59
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.59
WATER/SEWER - WORKHORSE WIPERS2587999
WATER/SEWER - WORKHORSE WIPERS
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 38.96
WATER/SEWER - WORKHORSE WIPERS
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 38.95
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.35
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.35
WATER/SEWER - RED AND YELLOW UPSIDE2588000
WATER/SEWER - RED AND YELLOW UPSIDE
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 29.70
WATER/SEWER - RED AND YELLOW UPSIDE
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 29.70
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.56
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.55
Total :187.14
98434 8/16/2007 067148 STERNBERG LANTERNS INC 00111866 STREET - GASLITE POST AND SUPPLIES
33Page:
Packet Page 94 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98434 8/16/2007 (Continued)067148 STERNBERG LANTERNS INC
STREET - GASLITE POST AND SUPPLIES
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 4,274.00
Total :4,274.00
98435 8/16/2007 067919 STIERLE, PAUL STIERLE0819 PARK CONCERT
CITY PARK CONCERT~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 750.00
Total :750.00
98436 8/16/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 116903 SUPPLIES
CABLE CUTTER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 27.48
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.45
Total :29.93
98437 8/16/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 121691 PS - FLANGE KIT
PS - FLANGE KIT
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.38
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.06
Total :37.44
98438 8/16/2007 071693 SUMNER TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 020507 MOWER
KUBOTA DIESEL MOWER FOR THE CEMETERY
130.000.640.594.360.640.00 14,007.00
Sales Tax
130.000.640.594.360.640.00 1,232.62
Total :15,239.62
98439 8/16/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10566485 SUPPLIES
34Page:
Packet Page 95 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98439 8/16/2007 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
BLIND RIVETS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.70
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.22
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.04
Total :24.96
98440 8/16/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18808554 EPOXY/GLOVES
EPOXY/GLOVES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 180.54
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 16.07
Total :196.61
98441 8/16/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10564701 STREET - STEEL LAG SCREWS
STREET - STEEL LAG SCREWS
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 21.23
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.89
STREET - SCREWS, WASHERS, NUTS, SUPPLIES18807370
STREET - SCREWS, WASHERS, NUTS, SUPPLIES
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 103.94
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 9.25
Total :136.31
98442 8/16/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 40537 WATER/SEWER - T SHIRTS
35Page:
Packet Page 96 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98442 8/16/2007 (Continued)040916 TC SPAN AMERICA
WATER/SEWER - T SHIRTS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 170.00
WATER/SEWER - T SHIRTS
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 170.00
LONG SLEEVED T SHIRTS
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 115.00
LONG SLEEVED T SHIRTS
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 115.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 25.37
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 25.36
Total :620.73
98443 8/16/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 40578 UNIFORMS
T-shirts: ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 90.00
T-shirts: Ops
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 90.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.01
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.01
UNIFORMS40580
T-shirts:ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 228.30
T-shirts:Ops
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 228.30
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 20.32
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 20.32
Total :693.26
98444 8/16/2007 065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA 000395 INTERNET ACCESS
36Page:
Packet Page 97 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98444 8/16/2007 (Continued)065710 THE CHAMBERS MULTIMEDIA
CEMETERY SEXTON INTERNET ACCESS
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 17.95
Total :17.95
98445 8/16/2007 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 12644356 ADMIN MISC
Annual subscription
001.000.510.522.100.490.00 141.00
Total :141.00
98446 8/16/2007 071843 TOMS TREE SERVICE Bus Lic Ref REFUND OVERPMT OF BUS LIC
Refund overpmt of Business Lic
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
98447 8/16/2007 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 36379 FENCE SUPPLIES
WIRE DOG
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.50
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.80
Total :34.30
98448 8/16/2007 068322 TRANE 7896466 ACC 2734329
HVAC preventative maint-PS~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 274.50
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 24.43
Total :298.93
98449 8/16/2007 070037 TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION INC E1DB.Pmt 1 E1DB.Progress Pmt 1 thru 07/31/07
37Page:
Packet Page 98 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98449 8/16/2007 (Continued)070037 TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION INC
E1DB.Progress Pmt 1 thru 07/31/07
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 297,740.45
E7FE.Progress Pmt 1 thru 07/31/07
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 85,566.97
E1DB.Retainage 1
125.000.000.223.400.000.00 -14,887.03
E7FE.Retainage 1
412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -4,278.34
Total :364,142.05
98450 8/16/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7593618 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
ELLS, TEES, ADAPTORS, FIELD
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 737.69
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 65.65
Total :803.34
98451 8/16/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7576453 WATER INVENTORY - W-HYDMJ-05.25-055
WATER INVENTORY - W-HYDMJ-05.25-055
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 2,763.70
W-STORTZ-04-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 273.80
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 258.19
38Page:
Packet Page 99 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98451 8/16/2007 (Continued)061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY
WATER INVENTORY - WTEEMJ-06-0207578120
WATER INVENTORY - WTEEMJ-06-020
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 281.44
W-VALVCI-06-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 394.55
W-SLEEVEMJ-06-010
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 281.44
ACCY PAKS - SUPPLIES
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 281.60
Sales Tax
411.000.000.141.140.310.00 81.38
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 23.94
Total :4,640.04
98452 8/16/2007 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 7079070 utility locates~
utility locates~
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 71.99
utility locates~
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 71.99
utility locates~
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 72.02
Total :216.00
98453 8/16/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 45.70
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 45.05
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM425-776-5316
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 107.24
Total :197.99
39Page:
Packet Page 100 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98454 8/16/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 NW1-0155 03 0210 1099569419 02
TELEMENTRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 216.25
Total :216.25
98455 8/16/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR
Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 42.21
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE425-672-7132
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 53.62
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 45.70
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 122.03
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.40
Total :303.96
98456 8/16/2007 068265 VERIZON ONLINE 65320341 ACCT #8372119
Aug 07 City of Edmonds Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 667.00
Total :667.00
98457 8/16/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 269992985-1 425-308-9867
cell phone-water watch
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 36.04
Total :36.04
98458 8/16/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0576733642 OPS COMMUNICATIONS
air card
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 60.03
Total :60.03
40Page:
Packet Page 101 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98459 8/16/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 31261303 1066294
SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 52.63
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 4.68
Total :57.31
98460 8/16/2007 006284 W S DARLEY AND CO CM-0032753 FLEET - RETURNED MICORSWITCH
FLEET - RETURNED MICORSWITCH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -99.32
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -8.85
UNIT 476 - BALL VALVE KITPM640188
UNIT 476 - BALL VALVE KIT
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 220.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.17
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.58
Total :142.58
98461 8/16/2007 065828 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2009-0005 INV#2009-0005 - B.PAULSON/EDMONDS PD
REGISTRATION/B.PAULSON~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
98462 8/16/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL A.JOHNSON WSP CRIMINAL RECORDS CONF/A.JOHNSON, EDM
REGISTRATION/A.JOHNSON~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 75.00
Total :75.00
98463 8/16/2007 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-5900 STREET - WORK DONE AT 1417 OVD, 901 6TH
STREET - WORK DONE AT 1417 OVD, 901 6TH
111.000.653.542.710.410.00 900.00
Total :900.00
98464 8/16/2007 049208 WESTERN EQUIP DIST INC 520912 SUPPLIES
41Page:
Packet Page 102 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98464 8/16/2007 (Continued)049208 WESTERN EQUIP DIST INC
FUEL FILTERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 95.94
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.51
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.21
Total :112.66
98465 8/16/2007 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS I0001938 STREET - PED HEAD REPLACEMENT DOOR
STREET - PED HEAD REPLACEMENT DOOR
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 900.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 77.40
Total :977.40
98466 8/16/2007 061752 WILDER CONSTRUCTION CO E7CA.Pmt 1 E7CA.Progress Pmt 1 thru 07/31/07
E7CA.Progress Pmt 1 thru 07/31/07
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 14,220.00
E7CA.Progress Pmt 1 thru 07/31/07
125.100.620.595.300.650.00 382,659.25
E7CA.Retainage 1
112.200.000.223.400.000.00 -711.00
E7CA.Retainage 1
125.100.000.223.400.000.00 -19,132.96
Total :377,035.29
98467 8/16/2007 045565 WSPCA HAWLEY WSPCA SPRING CONF. - S.HAWLEY, EDMONDS
REGISTRATION/S.HAWLEY~
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 150.00
Total :150.00
98468 8/16/2007 066654 YELLOW TRANSPORTATION INC 153-261077 FREIGHT
FREIGHT FOR NOISE BLANKETS @ CIVIC
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 1,374.40
Total :1,374.40
42Page:
Packet Page 103 of 217
08/16/2007
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
10:06:11AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
98469 8/16/2007 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0116010 STREET - SIGN BLANKS
STREET - SIGN BLANKS
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 206.20
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 19.84
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 19.25
Total :245.29
98470 8/16/2007 065357 ZUVELA, CURT 1554 CURT ZUVELA/BOOTS 2007
ZUVELA/BOOTS 2007
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 164.00
Total :164.00
Bank total : 1,248,681.37150 Vouchers for bank code :front
1,248,681.37Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report150
43Page:
Packet Page 104 of 217
AM-1126 2.D.
State Funding for Judicial Position
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Doug Fair
Submitted For:Doug Fair Time:Consent
Department:Municipal Court Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Judicial salary increase to maintain State funding for judicial position.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
See attached memorandum.
Previous Council Action
Approved by Finance and Public Safety Committees.
Narrative
See attached memorandum.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: 2007
Revenue: 6600
Expenditure: 3411.76
Fiscal Impact:
The revenue for 2007 was computed using the amount the City will receive from the State
($9200) if judicial salary is increased and then subracting the amount we would receive if the
salary is not increased ($2600). The net revenue then equals $6600.
The expenditure was computed by taking the salary increase from 2007 over 2006 ($1936) that
was approved last year: $1936. Then I added the new salary increase and multiplied by .33 to
cover September-December 31: $1475.76. The total expenditure then equals $3411.76.
The net gain for the City for calendar year 2007 will be $2753.52.
Attachments
Link: Salary memo
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 08/13/2007 04:05 PM APRV
Packet Page 105 of 217
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/13/2007 04:07 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/13/2007 04:20 PM APRV
Form Started By: Doug
Fair
Started On: 08/10/2007 12:40
PM
Final Approval Date: 08/13/2007
Packet Page 106 of 217
Judicial Salary Memorandum
When I first was appointed to serve as your judge in July, 2005, I finished out the
contract that had been signed with Judge White. Judge White’s original contract
provided that he was an independent contractor without benefits and was set at $65,000
based on a 24 hour work week. State auditors did not agree that the judicial position was
an independent contractor. As a result I negotiated an annualized salary and benefit
package of $59,000 for the remainder of the term (July-December 2005). This was
designed to be the rough equivalent of the previous contract, taking into account the
value of the benefit package.
In 2006 the City Council made the Edmonds Municipal Court Judge an elected position.
This qualified the City to obtain reimbursement from the State for court improvement
account funds. In order to qualify for these funds the judicial position must be paid at a
pro-rated salary that equates to 95% of the salary for a district court judge.
The 2006 salary for the judicial position was negotiated at $63,751 for a 22 hour work
week. This was exactly 95% of the district court salary pro-rated at 55% (22 hours per
week). This made the City of Edmonds eligible for court improvement account funds.
On September 1, 2006, the Citizen’s Commission on Salaries for Elected Officials
increased the district court salary from $122,012 to $125,672 on an annualized basis. To
remain eligible for the court improvement account funds (95% pro-rated salary for 2007)
the contract was renegotiated to a salary of $65,664 commencing January 1, 2007. This
was an increase of $1,913 from 2006.
Recently the Citizen’s Commission approved a large salary increase for district court
judges. The salary of a district court judge will be raised to $134,242 effective
September 1, 2007. On September 1, 2008 the salary will increase to $141,708. If the
City wishes to continue to receive court improvement account funds then it will require
an increase in the judicial salary. The pro-rated 95% salary will need to be $70,136
starting on September 1, 2007 and $74,042 starting on September 1, 2008. Please see the
email correspondence at the end of the memorandum reflecting this information.
In 2006 we received $3999 from the State. It is anticipated that Edmonds will receive
approximately $9200 for the calendar year of 2007 if the salary is increased. Therefore
the anticipated total amount received from the State will be $13,199 for 2006-2007. If
the salary is not increased then the City will receive approximately $2600 during 2007 for
a combined total of $6599 for 2006-2007.
Assuming that the judicial salary remained constant at $59,000 for 2006-2007 and
assuming that there is a salary increase as of September 1, 2007, then the total salary
increases over 2006-2007 will equal $12,055. Based on these assumptions then the net
financial gain to the City over 2006-2007 will be $1,144.
Packet Page 107 of 217
Based on these figures it appears that it still makes fiscal sense to keep the City eligible
for court improvement funds through September 1, 2008. I also believe that it is in the
City’s best interest to wait until next year to determine if it makes sense to increase the
salary in September, 2008. The Administrative Office of the Courts estimates the City
will receive $13,000 in 2008 if the City continues to raise the judicial salary.
I respectfully request that we renegotiate the salary term of the contract commencing
September 1, 2007 to set the annualized salary at $70,136.22 in order to keep the City
eligible for court improvement account funds.
Yes, in order to continue qualifying for 5454 contributions, your salary must be equivalent to 95%
of a district court judges salary, or $127,520 for a full time position. If you are still funded at 55%
then your salary at a minimum must be $70,136 ($134,232 x .95 x .55). Also note that another
increase is required to meet the new salary effective September 1, 2008.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fair, Doug [mailto:Fair@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:02 AM
To: Radwan, Ramsey
Subject: RE: E2SSB 5454 Salary Contribution
My salary at the city is reviewed on an annual basis with the calendar year. For the past two
years this has been approved as meeting the 5454 criteria. Has that changed? Do I need to
request that the city increase my salary in September?
Thanks, Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Radwan, Ramsey [mailto:Ramsey.Radwan@courts.wa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:34 PM
To: pburns@auburnwa.gov; Fair, Doug; gphillips@ci.kent.wa.us; tjurado@ci.renton.wa.us;
ron.mamiya@seattle.gov; james.docter@ci.bremerton.wa.us;
michael.morgan@cityoffederalway.com; Gillings, Fred (TAO 7 Days); mlambo@ci.kirkland.wa.us;
aemery@ci.tacoma.wa.us; todell@ci.everett.wa.us; swoodard@ci.yakima.wa.us
Cc: fwebster@auburnwa.gov; Ferebee, Joan; Yetter, Margaret (internet);
jmcguire@ci.renton.wa.us; yolande.williams@seattle.gov; Pettus, Yvonne (internet); Cusimano,
Jeri (internet); gina.palermo@cityoffederalway.com; lmorris@ci.yakima.wa.us;
selsner@ci.marysville.wa.us; Jeffries, Tracy (internet); Haake, Douglas
Subject: E2SSB 5454 Salary Contribution
As you know, one of the two qualifying criteria for 5454 contributions is the requirement that the
municipal court judge be compensated at a rate of 95-100% of a district court judges' salary. You
may also know that the Citizen's Commission on Salaries for Elected Officials recently
established a new salary schedule for district court judges.
The new rates are:
$134,232 effective September 1, 2007 and
$141,708 effective September 1, 2008
The entire salary schedule can be viewed at http://www.salaries.wa.gov/documents/Final2007-
08SalarySchedule.pdf.
Packet Page 108 of 217
In the next few days I will be sending a letter to your city notifying them that to continue to qualify
for funding municipal court judges within their jurisdiction must be compensated at the rate noted
above (95-100% of a district court judges' salary) effective September 1, 2007 with an adjustment
on September 1, 2008. I will copy all judges within your court as well as your court administrator.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Ramsey Radwan, Director
Management Services Division
Administrative Office of the Courts
(360) 357-2406
ramsey.radwan@courts.wa.gov
From: Radwan, Ramsey [mailto:Ramsey.Radwan@courts.wa.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 11:00 AM
To: Ferebee, Joan
Subject: 2008 5454
Joan, Edmonds will receive about $13,000 in calendar year 2008.
Ramsey Radwan, Director
Management Services Division
Administrative Office of the Courts
(360) 357-2406
ramsey.radwan@courts.wa.gov
Packet Page 109 of 217
AM-1135 2.E.
Proposed Ordinance on Rezone of Property at 125 2nd Avenue North
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:Consent
Department:Development Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance rezoning property at 125 2nd Ave North from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5.
(R-2007-15).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed ordinance.
Previous Council Action
On July 17, 2007, the City Council approved the rezone request and staff was directed to prepare
the necessary ordinance.
Narrative
This is an application by Michel Construction for a rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5 for property
located at 125 2nd Avenue North.
The Planning Board held a public hearing on the subject application on May 23, 2007, and after
deliberation, voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the change in
zoning. The City Council held a public hearing on July 17, 2007 and approved the rezone request.
(See Exhibit 2.)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Proposed Rezone Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - 71707 City Council minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 05:29 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/15/2007 05:36 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 09:02 AM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 08/15/2007 04:48
PM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 110 of 217
Packet Page 111 of 217
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
7/24/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 125 2ND AVENUE NORTH FROM RM-2.4 TO
RM-1.5 AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING
MAP, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, a closed record review was held by the Edmonds City Council on the
recommendation of the Planning Board to approve the rezone of certain real property described
in File No. R-2007-15 from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5; and
WHEREAS, for its Findings of Fact, the City Council hereby adopts as its
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Findings and Conclusions set forth in the staff
report with Exhibits presented to the Planning Board at its meeting of May 23, 2007 and shown
at pages 13 through 21 of the City’s Council Packet of July 17, 2007; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the adopted Findings and the recommendation of its
Planning Board, as well as the presentation of the parties of record at its closed record review,
the City Council hereby finds it to be in the public interest and consistent with the provisions of
City ordinance to rezone certain real property addressed as 125 2nd Avenue North, Edmonds,
Washington, more fully described on the attached Exhibit A and in File No. R-2007-15, from
RM-2.4 to RM-1.5. The Development Services Director or his designee is hereby authorized to
amend the official zoning map of the City to reflect this change.
{WSS668832.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 112 of 217
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS668832.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 113 of 217
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 125 2ND AVENUE NORTH FROM RM-2.4 TO RM-1.5
AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING MAP, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS668832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 -
Packet Page 114 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
July 17, 2007
Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. to interview a candidate for the Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in
the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Acting Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Traffic Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 26, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #97251 THROUGH #97415 FOR JUNE 28, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $553,924.67. APPROVAL OF #97419 THROUGH #97437 FOR JULY
3, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $196,367.70. APPROVAL OF #97438 THROUGH #97668
FOR JULY 12, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $446,427.64. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL
DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #45059 THROUGH #45162 FOR THE PERIOD OF
JUNE 16 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $840,632.63.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM LINDA KRAMER-
LIND (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND MICHAEL JORDON ($4,569.26).
E. SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH EDMONDS
SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Roll Call
Approve
6/26/07
Minutes
Approve Claim
Checks
Claims for
Damages
School
Resource
Officer
Packet Page 115 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 2
F. ORDINANCE NO. 3654 – AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 21.40.030 HEIGHT,
(C) HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS TO REPEAL SUBSECTION (1) RELATED TO A
NONEXISTENT ZONE.
3. CONFIRMATION OF CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF JOE MCIALWAIN TO LODGING
TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Mayor Haakenson advised the Council interviewed Mr. McIalwain prior to tonight’s meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
APPROVE MAYOR HAAKENSON’S RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT JOE MCIALWAIN
TO THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Councilmember Marin commented Mr. McIalwain was very qualified and had put his heart and soul into
the community.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPOINTMENT OF EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER TO FILL
VACANCY.
Edmonds Center for the Arts Executive Director Joe McIalwain explained two of the original members of
the Edmonds Public Facilities District Board, Kay Mahaffey and Jan Conner, recently stepped down from
their positions. Each played an important role of the development of the PFD and saw the project through
the renovation and grand opening of the Center. The PFD accepted applications and conducted
interviews of several qualified candidates and recommended the appointment of Bob Rinehart. Mr.
McIalwain described Mr. Rinehart’s background.
Mr. Rinehart commented he came to Edmonds wanting to be a part of the community. He viewed serving
on the PFD Board as an honor.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
ACCEPT THE NOMINATION OF BOB RINEHART TO THE EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES
DISTRICT BOARD.
Councilmember Moore commented Mr. Rinehart “hit the ground running” when he moved to Edmonds,
was a leader in the community and was very well suited to serving on the PFD Board.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 17008 - 77TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether a vacation was a legislative action. City Attorney Scott Snyder
answered yes, explaining there were certain limitations on the amount the Council could require if the
vacated property was originally dedicated by the party now requesting the vacation but that was not
applicable in this case.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this was an application to vacate public right-of-way within a
recently approved Planned Residential Development (PRD). The owners of Lot 7 were interested in a
vacation of an area on the northern boundary of their property to allow expansion of their footprint and
build a deck which they would be unable to accomplish without the vacation. He explained the public
Ord# 3654
Repeal ECDC
21.40.030(C)(1)
Lodging Tax
Advisory
Committee
Appointment
Public Facilities
District Board
Appointment
Vacate Portion
of Right-of-
Way Adjacent
to 17008 - 77th
Pl W
Packet Page 116 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 3
right-of-way contained two on-street parking spaces. He relayed Engineering’s finding that they
anticipated no potential use of this property.
Mr. Chave explained the property appraisal used a very different method and arrived at a much lower
valuation; typically a per square foot value was developed and applied to the property. Staff contacted the
appraiser who verified it was an appropriate appraisal.
Councilmember Wambolt asked who paid the cost of the appraisal. Mr. Chave answered the applicant.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the ordinance that states the maximum compensation that could be
required was one half the appraised value, inquiring whether that practice was always followed. Mr.
Snyder advised that was the limit under State statute. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether the
Council had any latitude with regard to how the property was appraised. Mr. Snyder answered the
Council would need to make a finding that the value was properly established. Mr. Chave advised staff
included two other appraisals in the packet as examples.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Don Wills, Edmonds, the proponent of the request, explained when staff instructed them to have the
property appraised, he researched appraisers via the internet and selected one located in Bothell. With
regard to the City’s usual method of a square footage valuation, he pointed out the amount of land was
560 square feet, an amount commonly referred to as an uneconomic remainder. He noted the discrepancy
in the valuation was due to the limited amount of land available. He inquired about the process if the
Council determined their appraisal was incorrect and whether there was any ability to negotiate.
Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Councilmember Moore asked staff to clarify the process. Mr. Snyder answered the Council was required
to make a finding that the vacation was in the public’s interest. Typically there were two considerations,
whether the City needed the property for another purpose and whether citizens received a reasonable
benefit from the vacation. The Council was free to negotiate if they did not feel the appraisal fairly
represented the fair market value of the property.
Councilmember Dawson commented it appeared this was the first time this issue had arisen as appraisals
were typically done in the manner Mr. Chave described. She asked whether consideration had been given
to establishing a policy for future dedications regarding how appraisals would be done. Mr. Chave stated
typically appraisers utilized the square footage method versus this method which resulted in a much lower
value. He referred to the appraisal examples in the packet, noting the Council often reduced the property
value. He agreed it may be appropriate to establish a standard appraisal methodology.
Councilmember Dawson observed if the Council rejected the appraisal, the options were to require the
applicant to have a second appraisal done or for the City to have their own appraisal done. If the Council
wanted a second appraisal, Mr. Chave suggested the City have their own appraisal done. Councilmember
Dawson asked the approximate cost of an appraisal. Mr. Chave relayed Mr. Wills’ comment that the
estimates they received were $400 - $1200, they paid $400 for this appraisal. Mr. Chave commented
most appraisals were more expensive than that. Councilmember Dawson asked the difference between
the appraisals. Mr. Chave answered appraisals of similar property ranged from $4 to $11 per square foot.
He noted another concern with this appraisal was it referenced property outside the area that he did not
feel was comparable.
Councilmember Marin observed the applicant appeared to have followed the City’s process.
Packet Page 117 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 4
Mr. Wills stated the reason they were requesting the vacation was the City determined a window seat on
the back of the house encroached into the setback. He noted they already removed the deck and French
doors from the house and were told at final inspection for occupancy they had to remove the window seat.
He explained they had approved plans for all the changes that were made and they had been inspected;
however, on November 16, 2006 the Planning Department determined there was an encroachment. He
noted this was the first knowledge they had of it, acknowledging the builder may have been aware.
Mr. Snyder explained property was usually vacated when the City identified unusable right-of-way and
wanted to eliminate the City’s liability for that property and return the property to the tax rolls. What was
unusual about this appraisal was, although it provides a square foot value, it used unimproved property
which does not determine fair market value. He noted the unique value of the right-of-way to this
property tended to skew how fair market value was determined. The Council had discretion to negotiate,
determine it was not in the public’s best interest to proceed, or send it back procedurally. He commented
likely what would be gained by another appraisal would be lost in the price paid for the property. Mayor
Haakenson commented the Wills had already paid the City $1525 for the street vacation.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Chave advised the initial appraisal was revised to be slightly higher at
$3 per square foot for a total appraised value of $1680 and Council could require payment of half that
amount. Mr. Snyder explained the Council could determine fair market value; the appraisal was to
provide a basis for the public benefit. If the Council felt the value was higher, the Council could make
that determination. Councilmember Dawson summarized the Council could find the property was worth
more than the appraisal indicated. She noted the property owner had offered to pay $1400 and asked
whether the Council could make a finding that the value was $3000 and require payment of $1400. Mr.
Chave agreed that would be appropriate. Mr. Chave agreed the vacation would add value to the property
and result in additional taxes for the City.
Councilmember Moore referred to the applicant’s indication that the plans were approved and then later
an encroachment was identified. Mr. Chave recalled the building permit was approved when the plans
showed it as a chimney which was allowed to encroach into the setback. When the structure was finished
and inspected, it was no longer a chimney but livable space which was when the issue of encroachment
arose. Councilmember Moore asked the difference between a vacation request and an encroachment
permit. Mr. Chave answered the City would never allow part of a building to encroach, only things that
were easily removable and would not be a hindrance should the City decide to develop the right-of-way.
Mr. Snyder explained an encroachment permit was for something in the right-of-way, this was for
encroachment into the setback. He noted a variance would not be permitted as it was due to the action of
the owner/builder.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out this was an example of a builder putting too much home on too
little land; there was no room for a deck on three sides of the home. Although the vacation was a small
piece of land, 540 square feet, it represented more than 10% of the 4,792 square foot lot. He noted for tax
purposes the property was appraised at $300,000 or $62.60 per square foot. This property was far more
valuable to the buyer than the City and would significantly enhance the value of the property to the buyer.
Mayor Haakenson remanded to Council for action.
Councilmember Dawson found the vacation was in the best interest of the public. She also found based
on the record that the value of the property was at least $3,000 and the property owner had offered to pay
$1400.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
VACATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ACCEPT THE OFFER OF $1400 FOR THE VACATED
LAND.
Packet Page 118 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 5
Councilmember Wambolt spoke against the motion, finding it was not a fair return to the City and was a
windfall for the property owner. He preferred to develop a fair market value using the usual method.
Councilmember Dawson commented the City did not have a standard appraisal method. If the City
obtained a second appraisal, the cost likely would exceed the amount the property owner would pay. She
found it was not in the city’s best interest to seek a second appraisal. She noted in the past the City has
vacated property for substantially less than the appraised value; in one example property was appraised
for $8,000 and the Council accepted payment of $1500.
Councilmember Marin spoke against the motion, preferring to accept half the value determined by the
appraisal due to the property owner acting in good faith.
Council President Olson commented the proposed solution was win-win for the property owner and the
City.
Councilmember Wambolt commented this would motivate builders to continue building substandard
PRDs and then wait for the City to bail them out. He pointed out this home would be far more expensive
on a larger parcel.
MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT AND MARIN OPPOSED.
Mayor Haakenson commented this was the first time an appraisal had been submitted using this
methodology; all others had used the other method. He asked whether the Council could direct staff to
require that methodology. Mr. Snyder advised staff could establish parameters for appraisals. He
explained the appraisal was intended to provide a piece of evidence for the Council’s decision; prior to
requiring appraisals, the Council used a square footage percentage of assessed valuation. It was the
consensus of the Council to have staff develop language regarding a standard appraisal practice. Mayor
Haakenson urged the Wills to take action against their builder as the plans were approved for one thing
and he built something else.
6. PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
EDMONDS CITY CODE, SECTION 5.05.010, DEFINITIONS, (M) RELATED TO DOMESTIC
FOWL, AND THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.35.040.
Councilmember Wambolt recalled the ordinance regarding cats was precipitated by cats attacking a
neighbor’s quail. A question then arose why quail were not included in the definition of domestic fowl
which he recalled City Attorney Scott Snyder indicated was an oversight. A decision was made to hold a
public hearing to invite public comment on the addition of quail to the definition of domestic fowl.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Snyder stated the definition of fowl had been in the ordinance for many
years. Apparently the definition was developed using the most common domestic fowl, chickens, and did
not include others. Councilmember Dawson asked what change was proposed to the ordinance. Mr.
Snyder explained this type of ordinance was typically directed toward animals raised for food and kept in
backyard coops versus an indoor animal. The definition of poultry was domestic fowl normally raised for
eggs or meat and includes chickens, turkeys, ducks and geese, an inclusive rather than exclusive list.
Councilmember Moore commented on her experience working on a ranch in Texas where they raised
quail, turkeys, pheasants, chuckers, other fowl used for food and hunting.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Amend Code
Definitions:
Domestic Fowl
Packet Page 119 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 6
Don Kreiman, Edmonds, a biology graduate of the University of Washington, pointed out quail were
not a domestic animal. He commented on property owners’ ability to enjoy their property as long as they
did not impact their neighbors, noting recent events involving a cat and quail was an issue between
neighbors. He was concerned with Council adopting legislation that could not be enforced or would be
selectively enforced. He encouraged Council not to adopt a regulation prohibiting quail because they
were wild animals.
Mike Mestres, Edmonds, objected to the Council spending time on what should be a neighborhood
dispute. He noted problems such as drug dealers in neighborhoods were worthy of Council discussion but
not quail.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, pointed out quail were game birds regulated by the Washington Department
of Fish and Game and hunting was allowed. He commented once fowl raised in a domestic situation
where they were restrained in a cage/enclosure got loose, they were wild. He recommended the Council
establish regulations for residents who raised domestic fowl.
Ray Martin, Edmonds, advised in early July the 10 to 15 captive quail were released in their
neighborhood. He described discovering quail on his property looking for food, commenting quail kept
in captivity were domestic fowl and were at a severe disadvantage surviving in the wild.
Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether there had been any discussion when the Council decided to
prohibit chickens about requiring they be confined instead. Mr. Snyder commented the cat situation was
mild compared with the furor that occurred when the Council limited the number of chickens; until the
public hearing the Council was unaware how many residents kept chickens. He noted the chicken issue
was a zoning discussion with regard to a non-conforming use right.
Councilmember Dawson commented the ordinance was not attempting to regulate wild quail but rather
quail raised in a domestic situation. Mr. Snyder agreed these provisions were aimed at the number of
animals a person could have on their property. Councilmember Dawson clarified the ordinance proposed
quail be treated the same as chickens, ducks, etc. and residents would be prohibited from raising them for
eggs or meat. Mr. Snyder agreed. She asked how many chickens a resident could keep. Mr. Chave
answered under the zoning ordinance, a resident was not allowed to keep any chickens unless they were
grandfathered. Mr. Snyder summarized quail would be banned as poultry kept for meat or eggs.
Councilmember Dawson asked if a grandfathering provision was also proposed. Mr. Snyder advised
anyone currently keeping quail as of the date the ordinance is enacted would be grandfathered under the
zoning ordinance. Councilmember Dawson commented that was consistent with grandfathering chickens.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE, NO. 3655.
Councilmember Plunkett spoke in support of the motion, particularly with the grandfathering provision.
Councilmember Dawson found it appropriate not to allow residents to raise chickens in their yard and
appropriate to treat quail the same as other types of poultry.
Councilmember Moore commented there were areas of the code that were arcane and archaic and this was
an opportunity to improve it.
Councilmember Orvis spoke in favor of the motion, noting consistency was the issue.
Packet Page 120 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 7
Council President Olson commented this did not appear to be a large issue to most citizens.
Councilmember Plunkett commented this issue was important to someone and it was important that it be
resolved.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance reads as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 3655 - AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE,
SECTION 5.05.010, DEFINITIONS, (M) RELATED TO DOMESTIC FOWL, AND THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.35.040.
7. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(2008-2013), PROPOSED RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
BOARD.
Mayor Haakenson advised the City received five emails from parents of Madrona Elementary School
students in support of funding for the Madrona walkway.
Traffic Engineer Bertrand Hauss explained RCW 35.77.010 and RCW 36.81.121 required that each city
and county update their Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) by July 31 of each year and file a
copy of the adopted program with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The
TIP document is intended as a planning tool for local, state and federally funded projects and is utilized
by the State, Puget Sound Regional Council, Transportation Improvement Board and other funding
agencies to develop the state-wide TIP and prioritize projects for competitive funding. It is not required
to show projects that are locally funded. However, the City of Edmonds has traditionally shown all
anticipated or planned projects.
The first three years of the TIP are required to be financially constrained. The last three years of the TIP,
however, are not. Projects must be identified on the TIP to be eligible for State or Federal grants. Mr.
Hauss noted approval and adoption of the TIP did not constitute Council approval of the proposed
projects, the Council would have additional opportunities to review the projects such as during the update
of the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, when staff presents the draft CIP for adoption,
during the budget summation, when staff requests authorization to call for bids or when bids are accepted.
He advised one new project, a walkway near Madrona Elementary School, was added to the TIP for
construction in 2011. He advised the walkway was included in the 2002 Walkway Plan and had a good
chance of receiving grant funds due to its proximity to a school as well as linking existing sidewalks to
SR104. He commented this project was ranked lower than it should have been in the Walkway Plan and
deserved a higher priority. He referred to emails in support of including this project in the TIP.
With regard to the SR 99 International District, Mr. Hauss made a correction to the federal funding for
that project, advising it was $316,000 for 2008. He relayed staff’s recommendation to approve the Six
Year TIP and adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Marin asked whether the Madrona walkway was included in staff’s recommendation.
Mr. Hauss advised it was.
Councilmember Moore welcomed Mr. Hauss to the staff and thanked him for his presentation.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Ord# 3655 –
Amend Code
Definitions re:
Domestic Fowl
Six-Year
Transportation
Improvement
Program
Packet Page 121 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 8
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, questioned the accuracy of the cost estimates particularly due to escalating
construction cost in recent years. He raised questions with several projects:
• Edmonds Crossing - does not include emergency access to the waterfront.
• Downtown parking - what does $20,000 per year buy?
• 196th/88th - how was the $200,000 project cost determined and did it represent the true cost?
• 212th & Five Corners - $810,000 shown in 2012 for a roundabout. What does a signal cost? No
grant funds shown for this project.
• 9th & Casper - recalled the previous Traffic Engineer deemed this the most dangerous intersection
in Edmonds, yet a roundabout is proposed. Would the State allow a roundabout?
• Olympic View Drive/76th - another roundabout estimated to cost $610,000. Questioned whether
the majority of the Council favored roundabouts.
• 76th Walkway - $900,000 cost estimate, no grants shown for this project, no engineering costs
identified
• Madrona Walkway - no grants shown, grants are available from Walkway to Schools program.
No engineering costs shown for this project.
He encouraged the Council to total the project costs and determine whether the City had adequate funding
for these projects. Mayor Haakenson advised Mr. Hertrich provided only five copies of his written
comments. City Attorney Scott Snyder suggested the City Clerk copy the material for the record and the
remaining two Councilmembers. Councilmember Dawson advised the materials contained the same
information Mr. Hertrich described in his comments.
Don Kreiman, Edmonds, displayed and described several photographs of dangerous walking conditions
in the neighborhood surrounding Madrona K-8. He advised funds were available for walkways from the
Safe Routes to Schools program; therefore, it was important to include this project on the TIP so that it
was eligible for grant funds.
Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
For Councilmember Plunkett, City Engineer Dave Gebert advised Mr. Kreiman was speaking in support
of including the Madrona walkway project in the TIP. Councilmember Plunkett inquired about grants for
that project. Mr. Gebert advised staff would pursue grant opportunities for that walkway project. He
recalled the City applied for grants for two walkway projects last year and received a $438,000 grant for
the 9th/Caspers/Puget Drive walkway; staff determined the 76th walkway did not meet the criteria.
With regard to Edmonds Crossing providing emergency access to the waterfront, Community Services
Director Stephen Clifton advised that would be considered during the final design permitting phase.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired about the $20,000 for downtown parking citywide, non-motorized.
Mr. Gebert answered there were several project categories in the CIP and TIP used to fund unanticipated
small project requirements such as traffic calming, minor signal improvements, downtown parking, etc.
He acknowledged there were no specifics for those funds as they were used to address unanticipated
projects as they arose.
With regard to the 196th/88th project, Councilmember Plunkett recalled the Council appropriated funds for
review of that intersection, commenting the $200,000 in the CIP/TIP was only a placeholder pending
additional evaluation. Mr. Gebert agreed in later years the cost estimates were less well defined; in many
instances six years out the estimates were only planning level or placeholders. A consultant has been
hired to evaluate the 196th/88th intersection; the $200,000 was a placeholder as the scope of the solution
was refined.
Councilmember Plunkett commented on the importance of identifying projects in the TIP and funding
placeholders in order to qualify for grants. Mr. Gebert acknowledged the cost estimates in later years
Packet Page 122 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 9
were planning level and did not become budget numbers until the Council approved the annual capital
budget. Usually by that time the design and costs were fairly well refined.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to $810,000 for a roundabout at Five Corners in 2012. Mr. Gebert
advised he had intended to change the project title to intersection improvement as it was unknown
whether a roundabout would be the best solution. He advised staff would change roundabout to
intersection improvements throughout the TIP. Councilmember Plunkett asked how the cost was
determined. Mr. Gebert answered the previous Traffic Engineer developed that estimate.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired about the $200,000 placeholder for the 196th/88th intersection
improvements versus $810,000 estimated for the Five Corners intersection improvements. Mr. Gebert
answered the $200,000 was likely to be low and in 2012 $810,000 likely would not be sufficient to
improve that intersection. He assured as the projects moved closer, the costs were refined.
With regard to Mr. Hertrich’s questions whether the Council wanted to do these projects, Councilmember
Plunkett commented this was a projected plan but the Council made the ultimate decision whether to
proceed with each project. Mr. Gebert agreed, using the 76th walkway project as an example, and the
presentation to the Council regarding phasing, the side of the street to locate the sidewalk, etc. He
anticipated a similar process for other projects on the CIP/TIP.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Gebert explained the first three years of the TIP must be financially
constrained - projected revenues identified to fund the projects, essentially what was in the CIP. The
latter three years were not financially constrained and represented somewhat of a wish list. He
acknowledged there were generally more projects in the latter three years of the TIP than in the latter
years of the CIP because the CIP was entirely financially constrained, thus the CIP was more realistic.
Councilmember Dawson observed the projects in the first three years were more likely to be
accomplished and the projects in the latter three years were a wish list to allow the City to apply for
grants. Mr. Gebert answered generally yes, however, 76th/Hwy. 99 was a high priority project and there
was $75,000 in 2008 for preliminary engineering to develop sufficient scope and design detail to allow
the City to apply for a grant; there was approximately $1.3 million in 2010 for construction.
Councilmember Dawson asked if grants could be pursued for projects where grant funds were not
identified. Mr. Gebert stated the most likely grant sources were identified in the CIP and TIP; however, if
staff became aware of a grant opportunity, it would be pursued. Councilmember Dawson noted there
were no grants for the 75th/76th walkway project. Mr. Gebert advised staff reviewed all grant
opportunities and determined it did not fit the criteria or score high enough to obtain grant funds.
Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene stated the walkways that scored well for grant funding were near
schools. Mr. Gebert stated grant applications were submitted for the 164th walkway and the
9th/Caspers/Puget walkway as staff was hopeful they would score well; one did and the other did not.
Councilmember Moore recalled talking to Congressman Inslee’s Chief of Staff who was famous for
obtaining federal funds and encouraged the City to contact Congressman Inslee’s office to request project
funds. She assured there were obscure funds available in the federal budget that the congressional office
could assist the City in obtaining. Mr. Gebert commented staff generally pursued grants via grant
programs. He welcomed the Council’s assistance with identifying federal funds that were not available
via structured grants. Councilmember Moore encouraged the City to notify Congressman Inslee what
they wanted and to allow him to determine the source.
Councilmember Dawson commented the City’s focus with its federal lobbyist was on high profile
projects such as Edmonds Crossing. She recognized Mr. Clifton who has done an outstanding job
seeking out funding alternatives for Edmonds Crossing. Councilmember Moore commented the lobbyist
did not find grant sources. She reiterated Congressman Inslee’s office had encouraged the City to request
assistance with funding projects.
Packet Page 123 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 10
Councilmember Marin pointed out Congressman Inslee’s office had been approached for funding for
Hwy. 99 with support from staff.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
APPROVE THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 1149 AND AUTHORIZE RECORDING OF THE DOCUMENTS BY THE
CITY CLERK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess.
8. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROVE THE APPLICATION BY ROB MICHEL FOR A REZONE FROM RM-2.4 TO RM-1.5
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 125 2ND AVENUE NORTH. (FILE NO. R-2007-15).
As this was a quasi judicial matter, Mayor Haakenson asked whether any Councilmembers had any ex
parte communications or conflicts to disclose.
Councilmember Marin advised Mr. Michel contributed to his campaign in the past.
Councilmember Plunkett advised he had received campaign contributions from the Jacobsons and from
Mr. Michel.
Councilmember Dawson advised Mr. Bernheim had contributed to her campaign but that would not
influence her decision in this matter.
Councilmember Orvis advised Mr. Bernheim had supported his current campaign and Mr. Michel had
supported his campaign in the past.
Councilmember Wambolt advised he received campaign contributions from the Jacobsons and from Mr.
Bernheim.
Councilmember Moore advised Mr. Michel had contributed to her campaign.
Mayor Haakenson asked whether any parties of record objected to the participation of any
Councilmember. There were no challenges voiced and Mayor Haakenson advised all Councilmembers
would participate. He allotted Mr. Michel 10 minutes for his presentation.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board reviewed this application. He identified the
subject property located at 125 2nd Avenue North on a vicinity map, explaining it was currently
designated in the Comprehensive Plan as high density multi family and zoned RM-2.4. The adjoining
properties are part of the downtown commercial core, single family to the west, multi family adjoining
and lower density multi family further north. He displayed an aerial photograph identifying the property
which was currently occupied by an older, non-conforming, 8-unit building. He explained the proposed
rezone would increase the density of the property but only allow seven units. The Planning Board
considered the staff report and the testimony and unanimously recommended approval.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if the applicant planned to develop the site with apartments or
condominiums. Mr. Chave suggested asking the applicant that question, noting the zoning controlled the
number of dwelling units.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to page 5, the Planning Board transcript, where Mr. Jacobson
recommended rezoning the entire area to RM-1.5. He observed that had no impact on this application as
Res# 1149
Six Year
Transportation
Improvement
Program
Rezone at 125
2nd Ave N.
Packet Page 124 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 11
that was not the applicant’s request. Mr. Chave advised the City was required to respond to the
application which was for this property. He noted the proposed zoning was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. He suggested it may be appropriate for the City to study the current multi family
zones as the only difference between RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 was the number of units; the setback, height,
bulk requirements, etc. were the same.
Councilmember Dawson recalled a reference in the record to an increase in density, commenting it was
not actually an increase in density and was in fact a reduction in density. Mr. Chave answered it was an
increase in density only with regard to what the zone currently permitted. Councilmember Dawson noted
if the property were rezoned, there would not be an increase in density. Mr. Chave advised even if the
existing building were demolished, either RM-2.4 or RM-1.5 zoning would not result in more units.
Councilmember Dawson questioned the benefit if it did not result in increased density. Mr. Chave
responded the assumption was a new building would be constructed and the change in zoning would
allow more units than the RM-2.4 would otherwise permit. Councilmember Dawson asked whether the
rezone would determine whether the building was demolished and a new building constructed. Mr.
Chave was not certain; staff’s understanding was the site would be redeveloped. City Attorney Scott
Snyder suggested consideration be given to GMA which assumed anything non-conforming would be
abated and densities in accordance with current zoning.
Councilmember Dawson inquired about benefits other than an increase in density. Mr. Chave referred to
testimony by Planning Board Chair Cary Guenther, an architect, who stated this building was at the end
of its useful life and therefore its overall property value was less than a new building. Councilmember
Dawson remarked the flipside of that argument was preservation of the existing building may provide
more affordable housing. Mr. Chave referred to Mr. Guenther’s statements on page 10 of the Planning
Board transcript that the building was at the end of its useful life and renovation was questionable because
it had not been built to last. Councilmember Dawson asked what Mr. Guenther’s opinion was based
upon. Mr. Chave advised it was based on his observations when visiting the site.
Applicant
Rob Michel, Edmonds, advised he would allow the record to speak for itself and reserve his time for
rebuttal.
Mayor Haakenson invited comment from parties of record.
Jack Jacobson, Edmonds, advised he lived across the alley from this building. He questioned the
statement that a 50-year old building could not be saved, noting the previous owners had done nothing to
the building for the past 20 years. He pointed out RM-2.4 was put in as a buffer between RS-6 and RM-
1.5 and BC. If this rezone were approved, he questioned whether the applicant could sell the property as
a 7-unit site which would increase traffic and density. He recommended eliminating RM-2.4 and
rezoning the area to RM-1.5.
Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, displayed the vicinity and zoning map, Attachment 1 to the staff report. He
referenced page 4 of the record, noting two of the reasons by Mr. Schlumberger in support of the rezone
were increased sustainability and increased affordability. Although Mr. Bernheim supported those
concepts, he preferred they be approached from a Comprehensive Plan point of view not on a lot-by-lot
basis, particularly when in this instance eight units would be demolished and replaced with 4-5 units. He
did not believe the objective of sustainability and affordability would be realized by constructing 1-2
more units that the current zoning allowed. He referred to page 45 of the record, citing an erroneous legal
basis via the statement that the recent implementation of the BC zone and its elimination of a third story
severely reduces the feasibility of building new residences downtown. He disagreed, noting three stories
were not allowed downtown. He questioned why the Council was even considering a rezone from RM-
2.4 to RM-1.5 as there was no justification in the staff report why RM-1.5 was preferable over RM-2.4.
Packet Page 125 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 12
He pointed out there was value in not increasing the density due to the increased burden that RM-1.5
zoning would have on services. He concluded the proposal did not make a substantial contribution to
affordability or sustainability.
Rebuttal
Mr. Michel referred to Mr. Bernheim’s comments regarding sustainability, noting those were not criteria
upon which the rezone was judged; the criteria was as listed in the staff report. He referred to the value
criteria and their explanation of how the proposal met the value criteria on page 46 of the record. He
stated there was more in value to the community than affordability, such as public health, safety and
welfare, aesthetics, improved safety via new systems, ADA access, etc. He noted the building was
constructed 55 years ago and the structure, plumbing, electrical were in poor condition, the units were
small with a poor layout, and there was no ADA access to the second floor. The building was in poor
condition and it was too expensive to rehabilitate it to bring it up to the current code. He noted
affordability was discussed at the Planning Board, he referred to page 9 of the record, and Mr. Chave’s
comment that although affordability was an issue, the City could not control the number or price of units
on a site. He referred to Mr. Guenther’s testimony that the building was at the end of its useful life.
Councilmember Dawson asked staff to comment on the existing Comprehensive Plan designation and the
zoning of the site.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Chave answered the Comprehensive Plan had two classifications of multi family - low and high. The
zoning classifications that correspond to high density multi family residential are RM-2.4 and RM-1.5.
The Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is multi family high density. The property owner
has a choice of applying for RM-2.4 or RM-1.5.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether the proposed RM-1.5 was consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. Mr. Chave answered yes and unless staff could determine a reason that RM-2.4 was preferable over
RM-1.5, most applicants would choose the higher density. He explained the RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 zones
were created in the early 80s before the current Comprehensive Plan was adopted. When the
Comprehensive Plan was updated, the multi family zones were not revisited. He noted it may be
appropriate to reconsider the multi family Comprehensive Plan designations; the Planning Board has
expressed interest in doing that. The Mayor’s Climate Control Committee could also be involved in that
effort such as determining whether there were incentives that could be offered to achieve the purposes of
the Comprehensive Plan. He noted currently it was difficult to distinguish between the two multi family
zones as the height, bulk, setback, etc. were the same for both zones and the only difference was the
number of units. He noted in an area where there was a solid transportation system like downtown, traffic
was unlikely to be a determinant between RM-2.4 and RM-1.5.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to comment that the City had failed to analyze the outcome of
proceeding with RM-1.5 zoning; however, it had been analyzed because the Comprehensive Plan
analyzed what zoning was suitable. Mr. Chave agreed, explaining the Comprehensive Plan considers a
range of land use alternatives, zoning that would be applied, environmental impacts, etc. relative to
utilities, services, density, projected population, etc. Therefore if zoning was applied consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, there should not be a need to reanalyze it.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the question why the entire area was not zoned RM-1.5. He asked
whether the Council could make their decision based on what they wished the zoning would be. Mr.
Snyder advised the Council was limited on this rezone to what was in the record and what had been
Packet Page 126 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 13
advertised; rezoning additional property could be referred to the Planning Board. Councilmember
Plunkett referred to the comment that the applicant could obtain the rezone and sell the property, asking
whether the Council could consider the applicant’s future actions in making a decision on the rezone. Mr.
Snyder answered no unless it was germane to one of the criteria. He noted profit was only considered if it
was property that remained undeveloped due to an inappropriate use category.
Councilmember Dawson commented it was assumed this property would be redeveloped if it were
rezoned. She commented the Council’s decision may be easier if the building had already been
demolished because that would eliminate the preservation issue. She acknowledged the property owner
could demolish the building and then request a rezone. She suggested a future agenda item regarding how
to make it easier for property owners to rehabilitate existing buildings and provide incentives for
preserving existing housing. Mr. Chave answered that could also be considered by the Planning Board
and Climate Control Committee when considering the multi family zones.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO UPHOLD THE
PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REZONE APPLICATION.
Councilmember Plunkett concluded the proposal met the criteria, RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 were consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, the bulk and setback requirements were identical, the use on the parcel
would remain multi family which was consistent with the surrounding area, it was consistent with
changes in the area, the property was economically and physically suitable, the value/public benefit met
GMA, and it would replace a deteriorated 1950s with a building that meets all safety codes.
Councilmember Marin acknowledged Councilmember Dawson’s concerns and agreed with the need to
consider housing affordability. He pointed out some buildings were built to last and others were not. He
acknowledged one of the difficulties with a remodel was the requirement to bring the building up to the
existing code.
Councilmember Wambolt commented this was not a building with architectural features that should be
preserved. It was a non-conforming building with eight units that if redeveloped would have fewer units
and be consistent with the current code.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROVE THE APPLICATION BY ROB MICHEL FOR A REZONE FROM RM-2.4 TO RM-1.5
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 318-320 WALNUT STREET. (FILE NO. R-07-28.
As this was a quasi judicial matter, Mayor Haakenson asked whether any Councilmembers had any ex
parte communication or conflicts to disclose.
Councilmember Moore disclosed Mr. Michel had contributed to her campaign.
Councilmember Wambolt disclosed Mr. Bernheim had contributed to his campaign.
Councilmember Orvis disclosed Mr. Bernheim had contributed to his current campaign and Mr. Michel
had contributed to his past campaign.
Councilmember Dawson disclosed Mr. Bernheim had contributed to her campaign in the past.
Councilmember Plunkett disclosed he had received campaign contributions from Mr. Michel in the past.
Rezone at 318-
320 Walnut St.
Packet Page 127 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 14
Councilmember Marin disclosed Mr. Michel contributed to his campaign in the past.
Mayor Haakenson asked whether any parties of record objected to the participation of any
Councilmember. There were no challenges voiced and Mayor Haakenson advised all Councilmembers
would participate. He allotted Mr. Michel 10 minutes for his presentation.
Planning Manager Rob Chave advised this was a rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5. He identified the site,
318-320 Walnut Street on a vicinity map, indicating the entire area was designated high density multi
family in the Comprehensive Plan, was adjacent to a commercial area and was surrounded by large scale
multi family development. The property around the site was zoned RM-1.5 with the exception of a
property to the west zoned RM-2.4. He noted the adjacent property to the south was an older high density
building with 42 units. He identified the site on an aerial map, advising there were three dwelling units
on one property and two on the other for a total of five. The application would increase the potential
density to a total of nine dwelling units. The applicant has completed a SEPA review and had ADB
design approval for a building with 5-7 units. At the Planning Board they voiced their intent to proceed
with seven units. He acknowledged the applicant could choose to redesign or sell the property. He
concluded in this location there were no negative impacts of a rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5.
Councilmember Dawson referred to testimony regarding getting rid of substandard property and
questioned what substandard property meant, noting it seemed to imply that new was better. She referred
to Planning Board Chair Guenther’s comment on page 7 that appeared to imply that older housing was
worse and newer housing was better. Councilmember Dawson commented the only evidence of public
benefit was the opinion that older housing was not as good. Mr. Chave pointed out the Planning Board
found a benefit of additional dwelling units downtown to support the commercial vitality of downtown.
Applicant
Rob Michel, Edmonds, advised he would allow the record to speak for itself and reserve his time for
rebuttal.
Mayor Haakenson invited comment from parties of record.
Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, commented approving the proposed zoning would reduce the diversity of
housing stock. He reiterated there was no distinction between RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 and no support that a
higher density was better. Although he supported higher density and the sustainability of downtown, he
wanted it done for the right reasons and not lot-by-lot. He commented from a citizen’s point of view, the
Council was handing these property owners a benefit at no charge. He preferred the City provide
incentives such as energy efficiency, sidewalks, open space, etc. in exchange for higher densities.
Rebuttal
Mr. Michel referred to benefits outlined in the record that included under-structure parking, access via the
alley which would eliminate curb cuts on 4th and on Walnut, and increased on-street parking.
Councilmember Orvis commented as currently zoned, the site could be developed with five units versus
nine if zoned RM-1.5. Mr. Chave agreed, noting the applicant had an ADB and SEPA approval for up to
seven units. The site was currently developed with five units.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO UPHOLD THE
PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REZONE APPLICATION.
In response to Mr. Bernheim’s comment regarding providing incentives for rezone, Councilmember
Moore supported that concept, however, the Council could not do that on this application. She found the
Packet Page 128 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 15
proposal adhered to GMA policies, met the GMA housing goals, fit within the surrounding uses, was
suitable and met the value criteria.
Councilmember Orvis spoke against the motion, commenting if allowing additional units on a site was
required to get buildings upgraded, the entire City would be rezoned eventually which was contradictory
to the changes, suitability and surrounding area criteria.
Councilmember Marin spoke in favor of the motion, noting there were many requirements a developer
must meet currently. He supported having the Planning Board consider the multi family zoning but
cautioned against requiring sustainability as he was hesitant to mandate sustainability in private buildings.
Councilmember Wambolt spoke in support of the motion. In response to Mr. Bernheim, he noted the
benefit of the rezone and subsequent new construction which would be more energy efficient than the
existing homes that were constructed in 1946 and 1966.
Councilmember Plunkett commented in a quasi judicial hearing the Council could not consider what
should be, only whether the applicant met the criteria with their proposal. He found the applicant met the
criteria under the existing code, zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS OPPOSED.
10. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, requested the Council consider term limits for Boards and Commissions as
well as the City Council and the Mayor. Council President Olson cautioned him to avoid campaign
issues. Next, Mr. Hertrich commented he could not recall a Council meeting being cancelled when he
was on the Council and he objected to giving the Council President that power.
11. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE INCLUDING: (1)
CANCELLATION OF MEETINGS, (2) EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, (3) GOVERNMENT ACCESS
CHANNEL 21, AND (4) COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
Council President Olson explained these issues were discussed at the recent Council retreat.
Cancellation of Meetings
Council President Olson did not envision this occurring very often, noting it occurred in the past due to
the loss of the Police Chief. As it was not possible to talk to each Councilmember because that was
considered a rolling quorum, there needed to be a way to cancel Council meetings.
Councilmember Marin was satisfied with delegating that authority to the Council President.
Councilmember Plunkett agreed.
Councilmember Dawson envisioned it would be a rare occurrence for the Council President to exercise
his/her authority to cancel a meeting. She acknowledged two meetings were cancelled earlier this year
due to Police Chief Stern’s sudden illness and subsequent memorial service. She found it inappropriate to
require staff and/or Council to attend a meeting under those circumstances. She remarked it was a waste
of public resources to schedule a meeting if there was no business as each Councilmember was paid,
some staff members were paid, etc. She concluded it was appropriate to delegate that authority to the
Council President.
Councilmember Moore commented the proposed method was more efficient. She noted a Council
President who cancelled meetings that the Council did not want to have cancelled would answer to the
Council.
Term Limits
Meeting
Cancellations
Council Rules
of Procedure
Packet Page 129 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 16
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3656. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance reads as
follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1.04 COUNCIL MEETINGS TO
ADD A NEW SECTION 1.04.140 CANCELLATION OF MEETINGS, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
Executive Session
Councilmember Plunkett advised he requested a resolution be prepared regarding Executive Sessions. He
recalled during the discussions of the park in south Edmonds over the past year, there was some confusion
regarding what information was and was not Executive Session, whether the Council should discuss
certain issues in Executive Session and in at least one instance the confidentially of an Executive Session
was broken. The intent of the resolution was to identify a way for the Council to reach a consensus
regarding when to break the confidentially of an Executive Session. He advised this resolution would
accomplish two purposes, 1) if a Councilmember believed an Executive Session was taking place that
should not, they could propose a motion to end the Executive Session and the Council could have
discussion and make a determination during the public meeting, and 2) prevent any one member from
revealing information that other Councilmembers believed was protected by Executive Session.
Councilmember Dawson commented the resolution did not appear to address Councilmembers
questioning whether the Council should be in Executive Session; she agreed it was appropriate for
Councilmembers to have the ability to question whether a topic should be discussed in Executive Session.
She noted the draft resolution also addressed the dissatisfaction expressed at the retreat with the way
meetings were handled, the way Councilmembers were recognized and the number of times each
Councilmembers could speak.
Councilmember Moore agreed the resolution did not appear to provide Councilmembers a way to
question an inappropriate Executive Session. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised a Councilmember
could always leave an Executive Session that they felt was inappropriate. He noted the City kept minutes
of Executive Session to satisfy the public at a future date that the Council discussed the appropriate issue.
He explained the Council could reach consensus in Executive Session. If the Council agreed to discuss an
issue in the open meeting, they could come out of Executive Session and make a motion to have the issue
placed on a future agenda and/or request information be released. In the absence of a motion, the
confidence of the Executive Session would be observed. He noted the resolution did not address the
appropriateness of a subject for Executive Session because that was addressed in state law.
Councilmember Plunkett recalled there were Councilmembers who revealed information that the Council
had agreed should not be disclosed. His intent was to develop rules so that all Councilmembers had the
same understanding. Mr. Snyder agreed, noting release of confidential Executive Session information
was a crime and a potential basis for forfeiture of office. The resolution was intended to establish an
orderly way to decide when Executive Session privilege ended. He concluded Executive Session
information remained confidential as long as the Council felt it should remain confidential.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
SCHEDULE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1150 ON A FUTURE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Committee Assignments
Council President Olson explained in the past some Council committee meetings were paid and others
were not; in assigning committees, it seemed more prudent to simply pay Councilmembers for a
Ord# 3656
Cancellation of
Council
Meetings
Packet Page 130 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 17
maximum of four meetings per month. Councilmember Dawson commented there were some committees
that Councilmembers attended that were not Council appointments. Council President Olson clarified it
would only be official meetings of the committees to which Councilmembers were assigned. Mr. Snyder
advised the Council must have a fixed compensation during their term of office. He recalled a cap on
payment for meetings was instituted previously.
Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman offered to email Councilmembers the list of meetings
eligible for payment.
Government Access Channel 21
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the proposed policy included the Mayor. Mr. Snyder answered
the policy did not apply to the Mayor. He explained the Council currently had no rule with regard to
allocation of assets. With regard to the use of City facilities such as Channel 21 or a room, each
Councilmember was free to use them as long as they did not violate State law. The issue arose due to a
question regarding a Council meeting versus a meeting called by a Councilmember and whether there
should be a distinction for the use of Channel 21 or other assets. If no change was made, all
Councilmembers had access to those facilities/resources. Councilmember Plunkett preferred the policy
apply to any elected official. He also preferred a majority of the Council determine whether a meeting
would be publicized on Channel 21. He clarified he was not suggesting meetings Councilmembers held
were anything other than constituent meetings.
Councilmember Dawson agreed with Councilmember Plunkett that the Council should establish a policy
regarding what information was publicized on Channel 21. Councilmember Dawson acknowledged
Councilmembers frequently announced events at Council meetings that were broadcast on channel 21;
those announcements could be viewed as advertisements. She recommended announcements be a
legitimate use of the Council’s time and not a campaign related event.
Councilmember Dawson noted rules were often applied differently during campaign season such as the
Mayor’s newspaper column was not appearing during campaign season. She suggested the Council could
establish a policy that they would not allow anyone to display information that even vaguely appeared to
be a political campaign.
Councilmember Moore commented this was the result of three constituent meetings she asked be
advertised on Channel 21. She emphasized they were constituent meetings and not campaign meetings.
She pointed out Mayor Haakenson announced his constituent meetings on Channel 21 and in Council
Chambers. She viewed Channel 21 as a way for the Council to communicate with the public and
encouraged Councilmembers to use this tool to communicate with the public but not to campaign. She
commented it was advantageous to the public to learn a Councilmember would be available at a particular
location to listen to their questions/concerns. She encouraged Councilmembers to have a constituent
meeting to take public input regardless of whether it was an election year. She preferred the Council use
Channel 21 to inform the public rather than being scared someone would use it to their advantage.
Councilmember Plunkett stated he believed Councilmember Moore’s use of Channel 21 was equal to the
Mayor’s use, and equally appropriate.
Councilmember Marin commented once a Councilmember announced they were running for election,
Councilmembers and the Mayor should be cautious about anything that could be construed as
inappropriate use of City facilities to avoid criticism.
Councilmember Plunkett preferred a more structured policy. He noted it was difficult to avoid criticism
without a policy that established a bright line.
Councilmember Orvis commented his Councilmember page on channel 21 containing his picture and his
name gave him an advantage during the election. He suggested during campaign season the
Packet Page 131 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 18
Councilmember’s page be replaced by a page for each position that contained the name, picture and
contact information for the incumbent as well as the challengers. He noted this would even the playing
field and not give incumbent Councilmembers an advantage via their page on Channel 21. He noted this
would be similar to a Channel 21voter pamphlet. He summarized this would keep the playing field level,
provide information to the voters and reduce the effect of special interest.
Council President Olson asked whether campaigning was allowed on Channel 21. Community Services
Director Stephen Clifton disagreed with Councilmember Orvis’ proposal, explaining Councilmembers’
pages on Channel 21 provided a service to the public, informing them who the Councilmembers are and
the committees they served on. He viewed the inclusion of an opponent’s name, picture and contact
information as a campaign purpose.
Mr. Snyder explained the issue for the Public Disclosure Commission was whether communications or
the use of city facilities was part of the normal and usual function of an office. Speaking with
constituents and being accessible to the public were a fundamental part of the office; anything that
facilitated communication with a Councilmember whether it was the use of the telephone, website or
Channel 21, was definitely part of the normal function of the position. He envisioned a way could be
determined to do what Councilmember Orvis suggested because the City was allowed to provide factual
information. He was hesitant about having a link to a candidate’s website. He noted a similar policy
would need to be established for the City’s website.
Councilmember Moore commented Councilmember Orvis’ idea was brilliant as it provided a public
service and encouraged more people to engage in the civic process. She suggested rather than having
debates between candidates, providing each candidate five minutes of air time on Channel 21. She noted
this was an asset to the public and leveled the playing field.
Councilmember Dawson commented many cities had video voters guides, that may be something
worthwhile to explore in the future although there were issues with who did the video taping, etc. She
preferred to establish a candidate page in addition to the Councilmember’s page, citing Snohomish
County as an example where two Councilmembers were term limited and could not run for office, yet
their contact information needed to be available to the public.
Councilmember Wambolt suggested scheduling further discussion regarding the use of Channel 21 on a
future agenda.
Although he supported a video voter’s guide, Councilmember Plunkett remarked Councilmember Orvis’
proposal encumbered a Councilmember’s highest responsibility which was to serve the people of
Edmonds. He pointed out the importance of displaying each Councilmember’s page with their contact
information and the committees they served on. He suggested referring this issue to the Community
Outreach Committee.
12. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Community Services/Development Services Committee
Councilmember Marin reported the Committee discussed plug-in hybrid cars and charging stations and
directed Public Works to investigate the concept of providing a plug-in for electric vehicles including cost
estimates, alternatives, experience of other jurisdictions and the possible costs of a short term lease for an
electric vehicle and report back to the committee at their next meeting. A discussion on building permit
application timelines was postponed to a special CS/DS Committee meeting on July 26 at 7:00 p.m. He
encouraged people attending that meeting to bring suggestions.
Finance Committee
Councilmember Wambolt reported the Committee discussed judicial salary certification for State funding
reimbursement and Judge Fair provided Committee members background information on the history of
Community/
Development
Services
Committee
Finance
Committee
Packet Page 132 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 19
the Judge’s compensation. It was the consensus of the Committee to forward a recommendation to
negotiate the salary term of the contract to keep the City eligible for court improvement account funds to
the full Council as a consent item. Councilmember Wambolt reported the Committee then discussed the
Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds School District for the School Resource Officer which provides for a
50% salary reimbursement. Committee members recommended approval and this item was approved as
Consent Agenda Item E this evening.
Public Safety Committee
Councilmember Dawson reported the Committee reviewed a draft graffiti ordinance. The Committee
agreed some of the issues contained in the ordinance were inappropriate for Edmonds such as requiring
businesses to keep graffiti implements behind the counter, not sell graffiti implements to minors, etc., but
should be forwarded to the full Council for a public hearing. A public hearing will be held in August.
She noted Snohomish County was hosting a graffiti summit on July 26 at 8:30 a.m. She asked Mayor
Haakenson to have staff attend and encouraged any interested Councilmembers and/or the public to
attend. The next item the Committee discussed was the judicial salary certification for State funding
reimbursement. She explained for the City to be eligible for State reimbursement, the Municipal Court
Judge must be an elected position and the salary must be equivalent to 95% of a District Court Judge’s
salary prorated by the number of hours worked. Raising the Municipal Court Judge’s salary would result
in a net financial gain to the City in 2007 but due to uncertainty with the reimbursement in the future, that
may not be the case in 2008. The City Attorney confirmed the salary could be reduced if the
reimbursement was not available and the Committee recommended an ordinance establishing a base
salary be scheduled on a future Consent Agenda. The final item, request for a contract amendment from
the City Prosecutor, was pulled from the agenda with a recommendation that staff negotiate with the City
prosecutor on any contractual issues and schedule the matter on a future Committee agenda if necessary.
13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson had no report.
14. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Olson wished Mayor Haakenson a belated Happy Birthday on July 14. She reminded
the public of the Concerts in the Park at 3:00 - 4:00 in City Park, announcing this weekend’s performer
would be Merchant of Venice.
Councilmember Dawson commented in response to a suggestion during audience comments regarding
Boards/Commissions term limits, explaining term limits may have been eliminated due to State
requirements of the LEOFF1 Disability Board that requires members be Police and Fire LEOFF1
members. She pointed out there were few remaining LEOFF1 members who were willing to serve on this
Board and there was a fairly steep learning curve. If term limits were established for that Board, the City
may be unable to meet the State’s requirements. With regard to other Boards/Commissions, the Council
always had the ability not to renew a member.
Councilmember Dawson also suggested discussion be scheduled on a future agenda regarding the
Council’s involvement in making appointments to Boards/Commissions rather than confirming the
Mayor’s selection.
15. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:56 p.m.
Public Safety
Committee
Concerts in the
Park
Boards/
Commissions
Term Limits
Packet Page 133 of 217
AM-1136 2.F.
Proposed Rezone Ordinance R-2007-28
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:Consent
Department:Development Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance rezoning property located at 318 - 320 Walnut Street from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5
(File R-2007-28).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed ordinance.
Previous Council Action
On July 17, 2007, the City Council approved the proposed rezone and directed staff to prepare the
necessary ordinance.
Narrative
This is an application by Michel Construction for a rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5 for property
located at 318-320 Walnut Street.
The Planning Board held a public hearing on the subject application on May 23, 2007, and after
deliberation, voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the change in zoning.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Proposed rezone Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - 71707 City council minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 05:29 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/15/2007 05:36 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 09:02 AM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 08/15/2007 05:04
PM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 134 of 217
0006.900000
WSS/gjz
7/24/07
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 318 - 320 WALNUT STREET FROM RM-2.4 TO
RM-1.5 AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING
MAP, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, a closed record review was held by the Edmonds City Council on the
recommendation of the Planning Board to approve the rezone of certain real property described
in File No. R-2007-28 from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5; and
WHEREAS, for its Findings of Fact, the City Council hereby adopts as its
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Findings, Conclusions, and attachments set forth in
the staff report presented to the Planning Board at its meeting of May 23, 2007 and shown at
pages 10 through 18 of the City’s Council Packet of July 17, 2007; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the adopted Findings and the recommendation of its
Planning Board, as well as the presentation of the parties of record at its closed record review,
the City Council hereby finds it to be in the public interest and consistent with the provisions of
City ordinance to rezone certain real property addressed as 318 - 320 Walnut Street, Edmonds,
Washington, more fully described on the attached Exhibit A and in File No. R-2007-28, from
RM-2.4 to RM-1.5. The Development Services Director or his designee is hereby authorized to
amend the official zoning map of the City to reflect this change.
{WSS668866.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 135 of 217
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS668866.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 136 of 217
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 318 - 320 WALNUT STREET FROM RM-2.4 TO RM-1.5
AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING MAP, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS668866.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 -
Packet Page 137 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
July 17, 2007
Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. to interview a candidate for the Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in
the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Acting Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Traffic Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 26, 2007.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #97251 THROUGH #97415 FOR JUNE 28, 2007 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $553,924.67. APPROVAL OF #97419 THROUGH #97437 FOR JULY
3, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $196,367.70. APPROVAL OF #97438 THROUGH #97668
FOR JULY 12, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $446,427.64. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL
DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #45059 THROUGH #45162 FOR THE PERIOD OF
JUNE 16 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $840,632.63.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM LINDA KRAMER-
LIND (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND MICHAEL JORDON ($4,569.26).
E. SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH EDMONDS
SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Roll Call
Approve
6/26/07
Minutes
Approve Claim
Checks
Claims for
Damages
School
Resource
Officer
Packet Page 138 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 2
F. ORDINANCE NO. 3654 – AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 21.40.030 HEIGHT,
(C) HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS TO REPEAL SUBSECTION (1) RELATED TO A
NONEXISTENT ZONE.
3. CONFIRMATION OF CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF JOE MCIALWAIN TO LODGING
TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Mayor Haakenson advised the Council interviewed Mr. McIalwain prior to tonight’s meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
APPROVE MAYOR HAAKENSON’S RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT JOE MCIALWAIN
TO THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Councilmember Marin commented Mr. McIalwain was very qualified and had put his heart and soul into
the community.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPOINTMENT OF EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER TO FILL
VACANCY.
Edmonds Center for the Arts Executive Director Joe McIalwain explained two of the original members of
the Edmonds Public Facilities District Board, Kay Mahaffey and Jan Conner, recently stepped down from
their positions. Each played an important role of the development of the PFD and saw the project through
the renovation and grand opening of the Center. The PFD accepted applications and conducted
interviews of several qualified candidates and recommended the appointment of Bob Rinehart. Mr.
McIalwain described Mr. Rinehart’s background.
Mr. Rinehart commented he came to Edmonds wanting to be a part of the community. He viewed serving
on the PFD Board as an honor.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
ACCEPT THE NOMINATION OF BOB RINEHART TO THE EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES
DISTRICT BOARD.
Councilmember Moore commented Mr. Rinehart “hit the ground running” when he moved to Edmonds,
was a leader in the community and was very well suited to serving on the PFD Board.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 17008 - 77TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether a vacation was a legislative action. City Attorney Scott Snyder
answered yes, explaining there were certain limitations on the amount the Council could require if the
vacated property was originally dedicated by the party now requesting the vacation but that was not
applicable in this case.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this was an application to vacate public right-of-way within a
recently approved Planned Residential Development (PRD). The owners of Lot 7 were interested in a
vacation of an area on the northern boundary of their property to allow expansion of their footprint and
build a deck which they would be unable to accomplish without the vacation. He explained the public
Ord# 3654
Repeal ECDC
21.40.030(C)(1)
Lodging Tax
Advisory
Committee
Appointment
Public Facilities
District Board
Appointment
Vacate Portion
of Right-of-
Way Adjacent
to 17008 - 77th
Pl W
Packet Page 139 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 3
right-of-way contained two on-street parking spaces. He relayed Engineering’s finding that they
anticipated no potential use of this property.
Mr. Chave explained the property appraisal used a very different method and arrived at a much lower
valuation; typically a per square foot value was developed and applied to the property. Staff contacted the
appraiser who verified it was an appropriate appraisal.
Councilmember Wambolt asked who paid the cost of the appraisal. Mr. Chave answered the applicant.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the ordinance that states the maximum compensation that could be
required was one half the appraised value, inquiring whether that practice was always followed. Mr.
Snyder advised that was the limit under State statute. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether the
Council had any latitude with regard to how the property was appraised. Mr. Snyder answered the
Council would need to make a finding that the value was properly established. Mr. Chave advised staff
included two other appraisals in the packet as examples.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Don Wills, Edmonds, the proponent of the request, explained when staff instructed them to have the
property appraised, he researched appraisers via the internet and selected one located in Bothell. With
regard to the City’s usual method of a square footage valuation, he pointed out the amount of land was
560 square feet, an amount commonly referred to as an uneconomic remainder. He noted the discrepancy
in the valuation was due to the limited amount of land available. He inquired about the process if the
Council determined their appraisal was incorrect and whether there was any ability to negotiate.
Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Councilmember Moore asked staff to clarify the process. Mr. Snyder answered the Council was required
to make a finding that the vacation was in the public’s interest. Typically there were two considerations,
whether the City needed the property for another purpose and whether citizens received a reasonable
benefit from the vacation. The Council was free to negotiate if they did not feel the appraisal fairly
represented the fair market value of the property.
Councilmember Dawson commented it appeared this was the first time this issue had arisen as appraisals
were typically done in the manner Mr. Chave described. She asked whether consideration had been given
to establishing a policy for future dedications regarding how appraisals would be done. Mr. Chave stated
typically appraisers utilized the square footage method versus this method which resulted in a much lower
value. He referred to the appraisal examples in the packet, noting the Council often reduced the property
value. He agreed it may be appropriate to establish a standard appraisal methodology.
Councilmember Dawson observed if the Council rejected the appraisal, the options were to require the
applicant to have a second appraisal done or for the City to have their own appraisal done. If the Council
wanted a second appraisal, Mr. Chave suggested the City have their own appraisal done. Councilmember
Dawson asked the approximate cost of an appraisal. Mr. Chave relayed Mr. Wills’ comment that the
estimates they received were $400 - $1200, they paid $400 for this appraisal. Mr. Chave commented
most appraisals were more expensive than that. Councilmember Dawson asked the difference between
the appraisals. Mr. Chave answered appraisals of similar property ranged from $4 to $11 per square foot.
He noted another concern with this appraisal was it referenced property outside the area that he did not
feel was comparable.
Councilmember Marin observed the applicant appeared to have followed the City’s process.
Packet Page 140 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 4
Mr. Wills stated the reason they were requesting the vacation was the City determined a window seat on
the back of the house encroached into the setback. He noted they already removed the deck and French
doors from the house and were told at final inspection for occupancy they had to remove the window seat.
He explained they had approved plans for all the changes that were made and they had been inspected;
however, on November 16, 2006 the Planning Department determined there was an encroachment. He
noted this was the first knowledge they had of it, acknowledging the builder may have been aware.
Mr. Snyder explained property was usually vacated when the City identified unusable right-of-way and
wanted to eliminate the City’s liability for that property and return the property to the tax rolls. What was
unusual about this appraisal was, although it provides a square foot value, it used unimproved property
which does not determine fair market value. He noted the unique value of the right-of-way to this
property tended to skew how fair market value was determined. The Council had discretion to negotiate,
determine it was not in the public’s best interest to proceed, or send it back procedurally. He commented
likely what would be gained by another appraisal would be lost in the price paid for the property. Mayor
Haakenson commented the Wills had already paid the City $1525 for the street vacation.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Chave advised the initial appraisal was revised to be slightly higher at
$3 per square foot for a total appraised value of $1680 and Council could require payment of half that
amount. Mr. Snyder explained the Council could determine fair market value; the appraisal was to
provide a basis for the public benefit. If the Council felt the value was higher, the Council could make
that determination. Councilmember Dawson summarized the Council could find the property was worth
more than the appraisal indicated. She noted the property owner had offered to pay $1400 and asked
whether the Council could make a finding that the value was $3000 and require payment of $1400. Mr.
Chave agreed that would be appropriate. Mr. Chave agreed the vacation would add value to the property
and result in additional taxes for the City.
Councilmember Moore referred to the applicant’s indication that the plans were approved and then later
an encroachment was identified. Mr. Chave recalled the building permit was approved when the plans
showed it as a chimney which was allowed to encroach into the setback. When the structure was finished
and inspected, it was no longer a chimney but livable space which was when the issue of encroachment
arose. Councilmember Moore asked the difference between a vacation request and an encroachment
permit. Mr. Chave answered the City would never allow part of a building to encroach, only things that
were easily removable and would not be a hindrance should the City decide to develop the right-of-way.
Mr. Snyder explained an encroachment permit was for something in the right-of-way, this was for
encroachment into the setback. He noted a variance would not be permitted as it was due to the action of
the owner/builder.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out this was an example of a builder putting too much home on too
little land; there was no room for a deck on three sides of the home. Although the vacation was a small
piece of land, 540 square feet, it represented more than 10% of the 4,792 square foot lot. He noted for tax
purposes the property was appraised at $300,000 or $62.60 per square foot. This property was far more
valuable to the buyer than the City and would significantly enhance the value of the property to the buyer.
Mayor Haakenson remanded to Council for action.
Councilmember Dawson found the vacation was in the best interest of the public. She also found based
on the record that the value of the property was at least $3,000 and the property owner had offered to pay
$1400.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
VACATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ACCEPT THE OFFER OF $1400 FOR THE VACATED
LAND.
Packet Page 141 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 5
Councilmember Wambolt spoke against the motion, finding it was not a fair return to the City and was a
windfall for the property owner. He preferred to develop a fair market value using the usual method.
Councilmember Dawson commented the City did not have a standard appraisal method. If the City
obtained a second appraisal, the cost likely would exceed the amount the property owner would pay. She
found it was not in the city’s best interest to seek a second appraisal. She noted in the past the City has
vacated property for substantially less than the appraised value; in one example property was appraised
for $8,000 and the Council accepted payment of $1500.
Councilmember Marin spoke against the motion, preferring to accept half the value determined by the
appraisal due to the property owner acting in good faith.
Council President Olson commented the proposed solution was win-win for the property owner and the
City.
Councilmember Wambolt commented this would motivate builders to continue building substandard
PRDs and then wait for the City to bail them out. He pointed out this home would be far more expensive
on a larger parcel.
MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT AND MARIN OPPOSED.
Mayor Haakenson commented this was the first time an appraisal had been submitted using this
methodology; all others had used the other method. He asked whether the Council could direct staff to
require that methodology. Mr. Snyder advised staff could establish parameters for appraisals. He
explained the appraisal was intended to provide a piece of evidence for the Council’s decision; prior to
requiring appraisals, the Council used a square footage percentage of assessed valuation. It was the
consensus of the Council to have staff develop language regarding a standard appraisal practice. Mayor
Haakenson urged the Wills to take action against their builder as the plans were approved for one thing
and he built something else.
6. PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
EDMONDS CITY CODE, SECTION 5.05.010, DEFINITIONS, (M) RELATED TO DOMESTIC
FOWL, AND THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.35.040.
Councilmember Wambolt recalled the ordinance regarding cats was precipitated by cats attacking a
neighbor’s quail. A question then arose why quail were not included in the definition of domestic fowl
which he recalled City Attorney Scott Snyder indicated was an oversight. A decision was made to hold a
public hearing to invite public comment on the addition of quail to the definition of domestic fowl.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Snyder stated the definition of fowl had been in the ordinance for many
years. Apparently the definition was developed using the most common domestic fowl, chickens, and did
not include others. Councilmember Dawson asked what change was proposed to the ordinance. Mr.
Snyder explained this type of ordinance was typically directed toward animals raised for food and kept in
backyard coops versus an indoor animal. The definition of poultry was domestic fowl normally raised for
eggs or meat and includes chickens, turkeys, ducks and geese, an inclusive rather than exclusive list.
Councilmember Moore commented on her experience working on a ranch in Texas where they raised
quail, turkeys, pheasants, chuckers, other fowl used for food and hunting.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Amend Code
Definitions:
Domestic Fowl
Packet Page 142 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 6
Don Kreiman, Edmonds, a biology graduate of the University of Washington, pointed out quail were
not a domestic animal. He commented on property owners’ ability to enjoy their property as long as they
did not impact their neighbors, noting recent events involving a cat and quail was an issue between
neighbors. He was concerned with Council adopting legislation that could not be enforced or would be
selectively enforced. He encouraged Council not to adopt a regulation prohibiting quail because they
were wild animals.
Mike Mestres, Edmonds, objected to the Council spending time on what should be a neighborhood
dispute. He noted problems such as drug dealers in neighborhoods were worthy of Council discussion but
not quail.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, pointed out quail were game birds regulated by the Washington Department
of Fish and Game and hunting was allowed. He commented once fowl raised in a domestic situation
where they were restrained in a cage/enclosure got loose, they were wild. He recommended the Council
establish regulations for residents who raised domestic fowl.
Ray Martin, Edmonds, advised in early July the 10 to 15 captive quail were released in their
neighborhood. He described discovering quail on his property looking for food, commenting quail kept
in captivity were domestic fowl and were at a severe disadvantage surviving in the wild.
Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether there had been any discussion when the Council decided to
prohibit chickens about requiring they be confined instead. Mr. Snyder commented the cat situation was
mild compared with the furor that occurred when the Council limited the number of chickens; until the
public hearing the Council was unaware how many residents kept chickens. He noted the chicken issue
was a zoning discussion with regard to a non-conforming use right.
Councilmember Dawson commented the ordinance was not attempting to regulate wild quail but rather
quail raised in a domestic situation. Mr. Snyder agreed these provisions were aimed at the number of
animals a person could have on their property. Councilmember Dawson clarified the ordinance proposed
quail be treated the same as chickens, ducks, etc. and residents would be prohibited from raising them for
eggs or meat. Mr. Snyder agreed. She asked how many chickens a resident could keep. Mr. Chave
answered under the zoning ordinance, a resident was not allowed to keep any chickens unless they were
grandfathered. Mr. Snyder summarized quail would be banned as poultry kept for meat or eggs.
Councilmember Dawson asked if a grandfathering provision was also proposed. Mr. Snyder advised
anyone currently keeping quail as of the date the ordinance is enacted would be grandfathered under the
zoning ordinance. Councilmember Dawson commented that was consistent with grandfathering chickens.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE, NO. 3655.
Councilmember Plunkett spoke in support of the motion, particularly with the grandfathering provision.
Councilmember Dawson found it appropriate not to allow residents to raise chickens in their yard and
appropriate to treat quail the same as other types of poultry.
Councilmember Moore commented there were areas of the code that were arcane and archaic and this was
an opportunity to improve it.
Councilmember Orvis spoke in favor of the motion, noting consistency was the issue.
Packet Page 143 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 7
Council President Olson commented this did not appear to be a large issue to most citizens.
Councilmember Plunkett commented this issue was important to someone and it was important that it be
resolved.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance reads as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 3655 - AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE,
SECTION 5.05.010, DEFINITIONS, (M) RELATED TO DOMESTIC FOWL, AND THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.35.040.
7. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(2008-2013), PROPOSED RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
BOARD.
Mayor Haakenson advised the City received five emails from parents of Madrona Elementary School
students in support of funding for the Madrona walkway.
Traffic Engineer Bertrand Hauss explained RCW 35.77.010 and RCW 36.81.121 required that each city
and county update their Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) by July 31 of each year and file a
copy of the adopted program with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The
TIP document is intended as a planning tool for local, state and federally funded projects and is utilized
by the State, Puget Sound Regional Council, Transportation Improvement Board and other funding
agencies to develop the state-wide TIP and prioritize projects for competitive funding. It is not required
to show projects that are locally funded. However, the City of Edmonds has traditionally shown all
anticipated or planned projects.
The first three years of the TIP are required to be financially constrained. The last three years of the TIP,
however, are not. Projects must be identified on the TIP to be eligible for State or Federal grants. Mr.
Hauss noted approval and adoption of the TIP did not constitute Council approval of the proposed
projects, the Council would have additional opportunities to review the projects such as during the update
of the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, when staff presents the draft CIP for adoption,
during the budget summation, when staff requests authorization to call for bids or when bids are accepted.
He advised one new project, a walkway near Madrona Elementary School, was added to the TIP for
construction in 2011. He advised the walkway was included in the 2002 Walkway Plan and had a good
chance of receiving grant funds due to its proximity to a school as well as linking existing sidewalks to
SR104. He commented this project was ranked lower than it should have been in the Walkway Plan and
deserved a higher priority. He referred to emails in support of including this project in the TIP.
With regard to the SR 99 International District, Mr. Hauss made a correction to the federal funding for
that project, advising it was $316,000 for 2008. He relayed staff’s recommendation to approve the Six
Year TIP and adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Marin asked whether the Madrona walkway was included in staff’s recommendation.
Mr. Hauss advised it was.
Councilmember Moore welcomed Mr. Hauss to the staff and thanked him for his presentation.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Ord# 3655 –
Amend Code
Definitions re:
Domestic Fowl
Six-Year
Transportation
Improvement
Program
Packet Page 144 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 8
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, questioned the accuracy of the cost estimates particularly due to escalating
construction cost in recent years. He raised questions with several projects:
• Edmonds Crossing - does not include emergency access to the waterfront.
• Downtown parking - what does $20,000 per year buy?
• 196th/88th - how was the $200,000 project cost determined and did it represent the true cost?
• 212th & Five Corners - $810,000 shown in 2012 for a roundabout. What does a signal cost? No
grant funds shown for this project.
• 9th & Casper - recalled the previous Traffic Engineer deemed this the most dangerous intersection
in Edmonds, yet a roundabout is proposed. Would the State allow a roundabout?
• Olympic View Drive/76th - another roundabout estimated to cost $610,000. Questioned whether
the majority of the Council favored roundabouts.
• 76th Walkway - $900,000 cost estimate, no grants shown for this project, no engineering costs
identified
• Madrona Walkway - no grants shown, grants are available from Walkway to Schools program.
No engineering costs shown for this project.
He encouraged the Council to total the project costs and determine whether the City had adequate funding
for these projects. Mayor Haakenson advised Mr. Hertrich provided only five copies of his written
comments. City Attorney Scott Snyder suggested the City Clerk copy the material for the record and the
remaining two Councilmembers. Councilmember Dawson advised the materials contained the same
information Mr. Hertrich described in his comments.
Don Kreiman, Edmonds, displayed and described several photographs of dangerous walking conditions
in the neighborhood surrounding Madrona K-8. He advised funds were available for walkways from the
Safe Routes to Schools program; therefore, it was important to include this project on the TIP so that it
was eligible for grant funds.
Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
For Councilmember Plunkett, City Engineer Dave Gebert advised Mr. Kreiman was speaking in support
of including the Madrona walkway project in the TIP. Councilmember Plunkett inquired about grants for
that project. Mr. Gebert advised staff would pursue grant opportunities for that walkway project. He
recalled the City applied for grants for two walkway projects last year and received a $438,000 grant for
the 9th/Caspers/Puget Drive walkway; staff determined the 76th walkway did not meet the criteria.
With regard to Edmonds Crossing providing emergency access to the waterfront, Community Services
Director Stephen Clifton advised that would be considered during the final design permitting phase.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired about the $20,000 for downtown parking citywide, non-motorized.
Mr. Gebert answered there were several project categories in the CIP and TIP used to fund unanticipated
small project requirements such as traffic calming, minor signal improvements, downtown parking, etc.
He acknowledged there were no specifics for those funds as they were used to address unanticipated
projects as they arose.
With regard to the 196th/88th project, Councilmember Plunkett recalled the Council appropriated funds for
review of that intersection, commenting the $200,000 in the CIP/TIP was only a placeholder pending
additional evaluation. Mr. Gebert agreed in later years the cost estimates were less well defined; in many
instances six years out the estimates were only planning level or placeholders. A consultant has been
hired to evaluate the 196th/88th intersection; the $200,000 was a placeholder as the scope of the solution
was refined.
Councilmember Plunkett commented on the importance of identifying projects in the TIP and funding
placeholders in order to qualify for grants. Mr. Gebert acknowledged the cost estimates in later years
Packet Page 145 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 9
were planning level and did not become budget numbers until the Council approved the annual capital
budget. Usually by that time the design and costs were fairly well refined.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to $810,000 for a roundabout at Five Corners in 2012. Mr. Gebert
advised he had intended to change the project title to intersection improvement as it was unknown
whether a roundabout would be the best solution. He advised staff would change roundabout to
intersection improvements throughout the TIP. Councilmember Plunkett asked how the cost was
determined. Mr. Gebert answered the previous Traffic Engineer developed that estimate.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired about the $200,000 placeholder for the 196th/88th intersection
improvements versus $810,000 estimated for the Five Corners intersection improvements. Mr. Gebert
answered the $200,000 was likely to be low and in 2012 $810,000 likely would not be sufficient to
improve that intersection. He assured as the projects moved closer, the costs were refined.
With regard to Mr. Hertrich’s questions whether the Council wanted to do these projects, Councilmember
Plunkett commented this was a projected plan but the Council made the ultimate decision whether to
proceed with each project. Mr. Gebert agreed, using the 76th walkway project as an example, and the
presentation to the Council regarding phasing, the side of the street to locate the sidewalk, etc. He
anticipated a similar process for other projects on the CIP/TIP.
For Councilmember Dawson, Mr. Gebert explained the first three years of the TIP must be financially
constrained - projected revenues identified to fund the projects, essentially what was in the CIP. The
latter three years were not financially constrained and represented somewhat of a wish list. He
acknowledged there were generally more projects in the latter three years of the TIP than in the latter
years of the CIP because the CIP was entirely financially constrained, thus the CIP was more realistic.
Councilmember Dawson observed the projects in the first three years were more likely to be
accomplished and the projects in the latter three years were a wish list to allow the City to apply for
grants. Mr. Gebert answered generally yes, however, 76th/Hwy. 99 was a high priority project and there
was $75,000 in 2008 for preliminary engineering to develop sufficient scope and design detail to allow
the City to apply for a grant; there was approximately $1.3 million in 2010 for construction.
Councilmember Dawson asked if grants could be pursued for projects where grant funds were not
identified. Mr. Gebert stated the most likely grant sources were identified in the CIP and TIP; however, if
staff became aware of a grant opportunity, it would be pursued. Councilmember Dawson noted there
were no grants for the 75th/76th walkway project. Mr. Gebert advised staff reviewed all grant
opportunities and determined it did not fit the criteria or score high enough to obtain grant funds.
Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene stated the walkways that scored well for grant funding were near
schools. Mr. Gebert stated grant applications were submitted for the 164th walkway and the
9th/Caspers/Puget walkway as staff was hopeful they would score well; one did and the other did not.
Councilmember Moore recalled talking to Congressman Inslee’s Chief of Staff who was famous for
obtaining federal funds and encouraged the City to contact Congressman Inslee’s office to request project
funds. She assured there were obscure funds available in the federal budget that the congressional office
could assist the City in obtaining. Mr. Gebert commented staff generally pursued grants via grant
programs. He welcomed the Council’s assistance with identifying federal funds that were not available
via structured grants. Councilmember Moore encouraged the City to notify Congressman Inslee what
they wanted and to allow him to determine the source.
Councilmember Dawson commented the City’s focus with its federal lobbyist was on high profile
projects such as Edmonds Crossing. She recognized Mr. Clifton who has done an outstanding job
seeking out funding alternatives for Edmonds Crossing. Councilmember Moore commented the lobbyist
did not find grant sources. She reiterated Congressman Inslee’s office had encouraged the City to request
assistance with funding projects.
Packet Page 146 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 10
Councilmember Marin pointed out Congressman Inslee’s office had been approached for funding for
Hwy. 99 with support from staff.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
APPROVE THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 1149 AND AUTHORIZE RECORDING OF THE DOCUMENTS BY THE
CITY CLERK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess.
8. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROVE THE APPLICATION BY ROB MICHEL FOR A REZONE FROM RM-2.4 TO RM-1.5
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 125 2ND AVENUE NORTH. (FILE NO. R-2007-15).
As this was a quasi judicial matter, Mayor Haakenson asked whether any Councilmembers had any ex
parte communications or conflicts to disclose.
Councilmember Marin advised Mr. Michel contributed to his campaign in the past.
Councilmember Plunkett advised he had received campaign contributions from the Jacobsons and from
Mr. Michel.
Councilmember Dawson advised Mr. Bernheim had contributed to her campaign but that would not
influence her decision in this matter.
Councilmember Orvis advised Mr. Bernheim had supported his current campaign and Mr. Michel had
supported his campaign in the past.
Councilmember Wambolt advised he received campaign contributions from the Jacobsons and from Mr.
Bernheim.
Councilmember Moore advised Mr. Michel had contributed to her campaign.
Mayor Haakenson asked whether any parties of record objected to the participation of any
Councilmember. There were no challenges voiced and Mayor Haakenson advised all Councilmembers
would participate. He allotted Mr. Michel 10 minutes for his presentation.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board reviewed this application. He identified the
subject property located at 125 2nd Avenue North on a vicinity map, explaining it was currently
designated in the Comprehensive Plan as high density multi family and zoned RM-2.4. The adjoining
properties are part of the downtown commercial core, single family to the west, multi family adjoining
and lower density multi family further north. He displayed an aerial photograph identifying the property
which was currently occupied by an older, non-conforming, 8-unit building. He explained the proposed
rezone would increase the density of the property but only allow seven units. The Planning Board
considered the staff report and the testimony and unanimously recommended approval.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if the applicant planned to develop the site with apartments or
condominiums. Mr. Chave suggested asking the applicant that question, noting the zoning controlled the
number of dwelling units.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to page 5, the Planning Board transcript, where Mr. Jacobson
recommended rezoning the entire area to RM-1.5. He observed that had no impact on this application as
Res# 1149
Six Year
Transportation
Improvement
Program
Rezone at 125
2nd Ave N.
Packet Page 147 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 11
that was not the applicant’s request. Mr. Chave advised the City was required to respond to the
application which was for this property. He noted the proposed zoning was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. He suggested it may be appropriate for the City to study the current multi family
zones as the only difference between RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 was the number of units; the setback, height,
bulk requirements, etc. were the same.
Councilmember Dawson recalled a reference in the record to an increase in density, commenting it was
not actually an increase in density and was in fact a reduction in density. Mr. Chave answered it was an
increase in density only with regard to what the zone currently permitted. Councilmember Dawson noted
if the property were rezoned, there would not be an increase in density. Mr. Chave advised even if the
existing building were demolished, either RM-2.4 or RM-1.5 zoning would not result in more units.
Councilmember Dawson questioned the benefit if it did not result in increased density. Mr. Chave
responded the assumption was a new building would be constructed and the change in zoning would
allow more units than the RM-2.4 would otherwise permit. Councilmember Dawson asked whether the
rezone would determine whether the building was demolished and a new building constructed. Mr.
Chave was not certain; staff’s understanding was the site would be redeveloped. City Attorney Scott
Snyder suggested consideration be given to GMA which assumed anything non-conforming would be
abated and densities in accordance with current zoning.
Councilmember Dawson inquired about benefits other than an increase in density. Mr. Chave referred to
testimony by Planning Board Chair Cary Guenther, an architect, who stated this building was at the end
of its useful life and therefore its overall property value was less than a new building. Councilmember
Dawson remarked the flipside of that argument was preservation of the existing building may provide
more affordable housing. Mr. Chave referred to Mr. Guenther’s statements on page 10 of the Planning
Board transcript that the building was at the end of its useful life and renovation was questionable because
it had not been built to last. Councilmember Dawson asked what Mr. Guenther’s opinion was based
upon. Mr. Chave advised it was based on his observations when visiting the site.
Applicant
Rob Michel, Edmonds, advised he would allow the record to speak for itself and reserve his time for
rebuttal.
Mayor Haakenson invited comment from parties of record.
Jack Jacobson, Edmonds, advised he lived across the alley from this building. He questioned the
statement that a 50-year old building could not be saved, noting the previous owners had done nothing to
the building for the past 20 years. He pointed out RM-2.4 was put in as a buffer between RS-6 and RM-
1.5 and BC. If this rezone were approved, he questioned whether the applicant could sell the property as
a 7-unit site which would increase traffic and density. He recommended eliminating RM-2.4 and
rezoning the area to RM-1.5.
Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, displayed the vicinity and zoning map, Attachment 1 to the staff report. He
referenced page 4 of the record, noting two of the reasons by Mr. Schlumberger in support of the rezone
were increased sustainability and increased affordability. Although Mr. Bernheim supported those
concepts, he preferred they be approached from a Comprehensive Plan point of view not on a lot-by-lot
basis, particularly when in this instance eight units would be demolished and replaced with 4-5 units. He
did not believe the objective of sustainability and affordability would be realized by constructing 1-2
more units that the current zoning allowed. He referred to page 45 of the record, citing an erroneous legal
basis via the statement that the recent implementation of the BC zone and its elimination of a third story
severely reduces the feasibility of building new residences downtown. He disagreed, noting three stories
were not allowed downtown. He questioned why the Council was even considering a rezone from RM-
2.4 to RM-1.5 as there was no justification in the staff report why RM-1.5 was preferable over RM-2.4.
Packet Page 148 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 12
He pointed out there was value in not increasing the density due to the increased burden that RM-1.5
zoning would have on services. He concluded the proposal did not make a substantial contribution to
affordability or sustainability.
Rebuttal
Mr. Michel referred to Mr. Bernheim’s comments regarding sustainability, noting those were not criteria
upon which the rezone was judged; the criteria was as listed in the staff report. He referred to the value
criteria and their explanation of how the proposal met the value criteria on page 46 of the record. He
stated there was more in value to the community than affordability, such as public health, safety and
welfare, aesthetics, improved safety via new systems, ADA access, etc. He noted the building was
constructed 55 years ago and the structure, plumbing, electrical were in poor condition, the units were
small with a poor layout, and there was no ADA access to the second floor. The building was in poor
condition and it was too expensive to rehabilitate it to bring it up to the current code. He noted
affordability was discussed at the Planning Board, he referred to page 9 of the record, and Mr. Chave’s
comment that although affordability was an issue, the City could not control the number or price of units
on a site. He referred to Mr. Guenther’s testimony that the building was at the end of its useful life.
Councilmember Dawson asked staff to comment on the existing Comprehensive Plan designation and the
zoning of the site.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MOORE, TO
EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Chave answered the Comprehensive Plan had two classifications of multi family - low and high. The
zoning classifications that correspond to high density multi family residential are RM-2.4 and RM-1.5.
The Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is multi family high density. The property owner
has a choice of applying for RM-2.4 or RM-1.5.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether the proposed RM-1.5 was consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. Mr. Chave answered yes and unless staff could determine a reason that RM-2.4 was preferable over
RM-1.5, most applicants would choose the higher density. He explained the RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 zones
were created in the early 80s before the current Comprehensive Plan was adopted. When the
Comprehensive Plan was updated, the multi family zones were not revisited. He noted it may be
appropriate to reconsider the multi family Comprehensive Plan designations; the Planning Board has
expressed interest in doing that. The Mayor’s Climate Control Committee could also be involved in that
effort such as determining whether there were incentives that could be offered to achieve the purposes of
the Comprehensive Plan. He noted currently it was difficult to distinguish between the two multi family
zones as the height, bulk, setback, etc. were the same for both zones and the only difference was the
number of units. He noted in an area where there was a solid transportation system like downtown, traffic
was unlikely to be a determinant between RM-2.4 and RM-1.5.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to comment that the City had failed to analyze the outcome of
proceeding with RM-1.5 zoning; however, it had been analyzed because the Comprehensive Plan
analyzed what zoning was suitable. Mr. Chave agreed, explaining the Comprehensive Plan considers a
range of land use alternatives, zoning that would be applied, environmental impacts, etc. relative to
utilities, services, density, projected population, etc. Therefore if zoning was applied consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, there should not be a need to reanalyze it.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the question why the entire area was not zoned RM-1.5. He asked
whether the Council could make their decision based on what they wished the zoning would be. Mr.
Snyder advised the Council was limited on this rezone to what was in the record and what had been
Packet Page 149 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 13
advertised; rezoning additional property could be referred to the Planning Board. Councilmember
Plunkett referred to the comment that the applicant could obtain the rezone and sell the property, asking
whether the Council could consider the applicant’s future actions in making a decision on the rezone. Mr.
Snyder answered no unless it was germane to one of the criteria. He noted profit was only considered if it
was property that remained undeveloped due to an inappropriate use category.
Councilmember Dawson commented it was assumed this property would be redeveloped if it were
rezoned. She commented the Council’s decision may be easier if the building had already been
demolished because that would eliminate the preservation issue. She acknowledged the property owner
could demolish the building and then request a rezone. She suggested a future agenda item regarding how
to make it easier for property owners to rehabilitate existing buildings and provide incentives for
preserving existing housing. Mr. Chave answered that could also be considered by the Planning Board
and Climate Control Committee when considering the multi family zones.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO
DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO UPHOLD THE
PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REZONE APPLICATION.
Councilmember Plunkett concluded the proposal met the criteria, RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 were consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, the bulk and setback requirements were identical, the use on the parcel
would remain multi family which was consistent with the surrounding area, it was consistent with
changes in the area, the property was economically and physically suitable, the value/public benefit met
GMA, and it would replace a deteriorated 1950s with a building that meets all safety codes.
Councilmember Marin acknowledged Councilmember Dawson’s concerns and agreed with the need to
consider housing affordability. He pointed out some buildings were built to last and others were not. He
acknowledged one of the difficulties with a remodel was the requirement to bring the building up to the
existing code.
Councilmember Wambolt commented this was not a building with architectural features that should be
preserved. It was a non-conforming building with eight units that if redeveloped would have fewer units
and be consistent with the current code.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROVE THE APPLICATION BY ROB MICHEL FOR A REZONE FROM RM-2.4 TO RM-1.5
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 318-320 WALNUT STREET. (FILE NO. R-07-28.
As this was a quasi judicial matter, Mayor Haakenson asked whether any Councilmembers had any ex
parte communication or conflicts to disclose.
Councilmember Moore disclosed Mr. Michel had contributed to her campaign.
Councilmember Wambolt disclosed Mr. Bernheim had contributed to his campaign.
Councilmember Orvis disclosed Mr. Bernheim had contributed to his current campaign and Mr. Michel
had contributed to his past campaign.
Councilmember Dawson disclosed Mr. Bernheim had contributed to her campaign in the past.
Councilmember Plunkett disclosed he had received campaign contributions from Mr. Michel in the past.
Rezone at 318-
320 Walnut St.
Packet Page 150 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 14
Councilmember Marin disclosed Mr. Michel contributed to his campaign in the past.
Mayor Haakenson asked whether any parties of record objected to the participation of any
Councilmember. There were no challenges voiced and Mayor Haakenson advised all Councilmembers
would participate. He allotted Mr. Michel 10 minutes for his presentation.
Planning Manager Rob Chave advised this was a rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5. He identified the site,
318-320 Walnut Street on a vicinity map, indicating the entire area was designated high density multi
family in the Comprehensive Plan, was adjacent to a commercial area and was surrounded by large scale
multi family development. The property around the site was zoned RM-1.5 with the exception of a
property to the west zoned RM-2.4. He noted the adjacent property to the south was an older high density
building with 42 units. He identified the site on an aerial map, advising there were three dwelling units
on one property and two on the other for a total of five. The application would increase the potential
density to a total of nine dwelling units. The applicant has completed a SEPA review and had ADB
design approval for a building with 5-7 units. At the Planning Board they voiced their intent to proceed
with seven units. He acknowledged the applicant could choose to redesign or sell the property. He
concluded in this location there were no negative impacts of a rezone from RM-2.4 to RM-1.5.
Councilmember Dawson referred to testimony regarding getting rid of substandard property and
questioned what substandard property meant, noting it seemed to imply that new was better. She referred
to Planning Board Chair Guenther’s comment on page 7 that appeared to imply that older housing was
worse and newer housing was better. Councilmember Dawson commented the only evidence of public
benefit was the opinion that older housing was not as good. Mr. Chave pointed out the Planning Board
found a benefit of additional dwelling units downtown to support the commercial vitality of downtown.
Applicant
Rob Michel, Edmonds, advised he would allow the record to speak for itself and reserve his time for
rebuttal.
Mayor Haakenson invited comment from parties of record.
Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, commented approving the proposed zoning would reduce the diversity of
housing stock. He reiterated there was no distinction between RM-2.4 and RM-1.5 and no support that a
higher density was better. Although he supported higher density and the sustainability of downtown, he
wanted it done for the right reasons and not lot-by-lot. He commented from a citizen’s point of view, the
Council was handing these property owners a benefit at no charge. He preferred the City provide
incentives such as energy efficiency, sidewalks, open space, etc. in exchange for higher densities.
Rebuttal
Mr. Michel referred to benefits outlined in the record that included under-structure parking, access via the
alley which would eliminate curb cuts on 4th and on Walnut, and increased on-street parking.
Councilmember Orvis commented as currently zoned, the site could be developed with five units versus
nine if zoned RM-1.5. Mr. Chave agreed, noting the applicant had an ADB and SEPA approval for up to
seven units. The site was currently developed with five units.
COUNCILMEMBER MOORE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO UPHOLD THE
PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REZONE APPLICATION.
In response to Mr. Bernheim’s comment regarding providing incentives for rezone, Councilmember
Moore supported that concept, however, the Council could not do that on this application. She found the
Packet Page 151 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 15
proposal adhered to GMA policies, met the GMA housing goals, fit within the surrounding uses, was
suitable and met the value criteria.
Councilmember Orvis spoke against the motion, commenting if allowing additional units on a site was
required to get buildings upgraded, the entire City would be rezoned eventually which was contradictory
to the changes, suitability and surrounding area criteria.
Councilmember Marin spoke in favor of the motion, noting there were many requirements a developer
must meet currently. He supported having the Planning Board consider the multi family zoning but
cautioned against requiring sustainability as he was hesitant to mandate sustainability in private buildings.
Councilmember Wambolt spoke in support of the motion. In response to Mr. Bernheim, he noted the
benefit of the rezone and subsequent new construction which would be more energy efficient than the
existing homes that were constructed in 1946 and 1966.
Councilmember Plunkett commented in a quasi judicial hearing the Council could not consider what
should be, only whether the applicant met the criteria with their proposal. He found the applicant met the
criteria under the existing code, zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS OPPOSED.
10. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, requested the Council consider term limits for Boards and Commissions as
well as the City Council and the Mayor. Council President Olson cautioned him to avoid campaign
issues. Next, Mr. Hertrich commented he could not recall a Council meeting being cancelled when he
was on the Council and he objected to giving the Council President that power.
11. DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE INCLUDING: (1)
CANCELLATION OF MEETINGS, (2) EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, (3) GOVERNMENT ACCESS
CHANNEL 21, AND (4) COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
Council President Olson explained these issues were discussed at the recent Council retreat.
Cancellation of Meetings
Council President Olson did not envision this occurring very often, noting it occurred in the past due to
the loss of the Police Chief. As it was not possible to talk to each Councilmember because that was
considered a rolling quorum, there needed to be a way to cancel Council meetings.
Councilmember Marin was satisfied with delegating that authority to the Council President.
Councilmember Plunkett agreed.
Councilmember Dawson envisioned it would be a rare occurrence for the Council President to exercise
his/her authority to cancel a meeting. She acknowledged two meetings were cancelled earlier this year
due to Police Chief Stern’s sudden illness and subsequent memorial service. She found it inappropriate to
require staff and/or Council to attend a meeting under those circumstances. She remarked it was a waste
of public resources to schedule a meeting if there was no business as each Councilmember was paid,
some staff members were paid, etc. She concluded it was appropriate to delegate that authority to the
Council President.
Councilmember Moore commented the proposed method was more efficient. She noted a Council
President who cancelled meetings that the Council did not want to have cancelled would answer to the
Council.
Term Limits
Meeting
Cancellations
Council Rules
of Procedure
Packet Page 152 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 16
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3656. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance reads as
follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1.04 COUNCIL MEETINGS TO
ADD A NEW SECTION 1.04.140 CANCELLATION OF MEETINGS, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
Executive Session
Councilmember Plunkett advised he requested a resolution be prepared regarding Executive Sessions. He
recalled during the discussions of the park in south Edmonds over the past year, there was some confusion
regarding what information was and was not Executive Session, whether the Council should discuss
certain issues in Executive Session and in at least one instance the confidentially of an Executive Session
was broken. The intent of the resolution was to identify a way for the Council to reach a consensus
regarding when to break the confidentially of an Executive Session. He advised this resolution would
accomplish two purposes, 1) if a Councilmember believed an Executive Session was taking place that
should not, they could propose a motion to end the Executive Session and the Council could have
discussion and make a determination during the public meeting, and 2) prevent any one member from
revealing information that other Councilmembers believed was protected by Executive Session.
Councilmember Dawson commented the resolution did not appear to address Councilmembers
questioning whether the Council should be in Executive Session; she agreed it was appropriate for
Councilmembers to have the ability to question whether a topic should be discussed in Executive Session.
She noted the draft resolution also addressed the dissatisfaction expressed at the retreat with the way
meetings were handled, the way Councilmembers were recognized and the number of times each
Councilmembers could speak.
Councilmember Moore agreed the resolution did not appear to provide Councilmembers a way to
question an inappropriate Executive Session. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised a Councilmember
could always leave an Executive Session that they felt was inappropriate. He noted the City kept minutes
of Executive Session to satisfy the public at a future date that the Council discussed the appropriate issue.
He explained the Council could reach consensus in Executive Session. If the Council agreed to discuss an
issue in the open meeting, they could come out of Executive Session and make a motion to have the issue
placed on a future agenda and/or request information be released. In the absence of a motion, the
confidence of the Executive Session would be observed. He noted the resolution did not address the
appropriateness of a subject for Executive Session because that was addressed in state law.
Councilmember Plunkett recalled there were Councilmembers who revealed information that the Council
had agreed should not be disclosed. His intent was to develop rules so that all Councilmembers had the
same understanding. Mr. Snyder agreed, noting release of confidential Executive Session information
was a crime and a potential basis for forfeiture of office. The resolution was intended to establish an
orderly way to decide when Executive Session privilege ended. He concluded Executive Session
information remained confidential as long as the Council felt it should remain confidential.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
SCHEDULE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1150 ON A FUTURE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Committee Assignments
Council President Olson explained in the past some Council committee meetings were paid and others
were not; in assigning committees, it seemed more prudent to simply pay Councilmembers for a
Ord# 3656
Cancellation of
Council
Meetings
Packet Page 153 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 17
maximum of four meetings per month. Councilmember Dawson commented there were some committees
that Councilmembers attended that were not Council appointments. Council President Olson clarified it
would only be official meetings of the committees to which Councilmembers were assigned. Mr. Snyder
advised the Council must have a fixed compensation during their term of office. He recalled a cap on
payment for meetings was instituted previously.
Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman offered to email Councilmembers the list of meetings
eligible for payment.
Government Access Channel 21
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the proposed policy included the Mayor. Mr. Snyder answered
the policy did not apply to the Mayor. He explained the Council currently had no rule with regard to
allocation of assets. With regard to the use of City facilities such as Channel 21 or a room, each
Councilmember was free to use them as long as they did not violate State law. The issue arose due to a
question regarding a Council meeting versus a meeting called by a Councilmember and whether there
should be a distinction for the use of Channel 21 or other assets. If no change was made, all
Councilmembers had access to those facilities/resources. Councilmember Plunkett preferred the policy
apply to any elected official. He also preferred a majority of the Council determine whether a meeting
would be publicized on Channel 21. He clarified he was not suggesting meetings Councilmembers held
were anything other than constituent meetings.
Councilmember Dawson agreed with Councilmember Plunkett that the Council should establish a policy
regarding what information was publicized on Channel 21. Councilmember Dawson acknowledged
Councilmembers frequently announced events at Council meetings that were broadcast on channel 21;
those announcements could be viewed as advertisements. She recommended announcements be a
legitimate use of the Council’s time and not a campaign related event.
Councilmember Dawson noted rules were often applied differently during campaign season such as the
Mayor’s newspaper column was not appearing during campaign season. She suggested the Council could
establish a policy that they would not allow anyone to display information that even vaguely appeared to
be a political campaign.
Councilmember Moore commented this was the result of three constituent meetings she asked be
advertised on Channel 21. She emphasized they were constituent meetings and not campaign meetings.
She pointed out Mayor Haakenson announced his constituent meetings on Channel 21 and in Council
Chambers. She viewed Channel 21 as a way for the Council to communicate with the public and
encouraged Councilmembers to use this tool to communicate with the public but not to campaign. She
commented it was advantageous to the public to learn a Councilmember would be available at a particular
location to listen to their questions/concerns. She encouraged Councilmembers to have a constituent
meeting to take public input regardless of whether it was an election year. She preferred the Council use
Channel 21 to inform the public rather than being scared someone would use it to their advantage.
Councilmember Plunkett stated he believed Councilmember Moore’s use of Channel 21 was equal to the
Mayor’s use, and equally appropriate.
Councilmember Marin commented once a Councilmember announced they were running for election,
Councilmembers and the Mayor should be cautious about anything that could be construed as
inappropriate use of City facilities to avoid criticism.
Councilmember Plunkett preferred a more structured policy. He noted it was difficult to avoid criticism
without a policy that established a bright line.
Councilmember Orvis commented his Councilmember page on channel 21 containing his picture and his
name gave him an advantage during the election. He suggested during campaign season the
Packet Page 154 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 18
Councilmember’s page be replaced by a page for each position that contained the name, picture and
contact information for the incumbent as well as the challengers. He noted this would even the playing
field and not give incumbent Councilmembers an advantage via their page on Channel 21. He noted this
would be similar to a Channel 21voter pamphlet. He summarized this would keep the playing field level,
provide information to the voters and reduce the effect of special interest.
Council President Olson asked whether campaigning was allowed on Channel 21. Community Services
Director Stephen Clifton disagreed with Councilmember Orvis’ proposal, explaining Councilmembers’
pages on Channel 21 provided a service to the public, informing them who the Councilmembers are and
the committees they served on. He viewed the inclusion of an opponent’s name, picture and contact
information as a campaign purpose.
Mr. Snyder explained the issue for the Public Disclosure Commission was whether communications or
the use of city facilities was part of the normal and usual function of an office. Speaking with
constituents and being accessible to the public were a fundamental part of the office; anything that
facilitated communication with a Councilmember whether it was the use of the telephone, website or
Channel 21, was definitely part of the normal function of the position. He envisioned a way could be
determined to do what Councilmember Orvis suggested because the City was allowed to provide factual
information. He was hesitant about having a link to a candidate’s website. He noted a similar policy
would need to be established for the City’s website.
Councilmember Moore commented Councilmember Orvis’ idea was brilliant as it provided a public
service and encouraged more people to engage in the civic process. She suggested rather than having
debates between candidates, providing each candidate five minutes of air time on Channel 21. She noted
this was an asset to the public and leveled the playing field.
Councilmember Dawson commented many cities had video voters guides, that may be something
worthwhile to explore in the future although there were issues with who did the video taping, etc. She
preferred to establish a candidate page in addition to the Councilmember’s page, citing Snohomish
County as an example where two Councilmembers were term limited and could not run for office, yet
their contact information needed to be available to the public.
Councilmember Wambolt suggested scheduling further discussion regarding the use of Channel 21 on a
future agenda.
Although he supported a video voter’s guide, Councilmember Plunkett remarked Councilmember Orvis’
proposal encumbered a Councilmember’s highest responsibility which was to serve the people of
Edmonds. He pointed out the importance of displaying each Councilmember’s page with their contact
information and the committees they served on. He suggested referring this issue to the Community
Outreach Committee.
12. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Community Services/Development Services Committee
Councilmember Marin reported the Committee discussed plug-in hybrid cars and charging stations and
directed Public Works to investigate the concept of providing a plug-in for electric vehicles including cost
estimates, alternatives, experience of other jurisdictions and the possible costs of a short term lease for an
electric vehicle and report back to the committee at their next meeting. A discussion on building permit
application timelines was postponed to a special CS/DS Committee meeting on July 26 at 7:00 p.m. He
encouraged people attending that meeting to bring suggestions.
Finance Committee
Councilmember Wambolt reported the Committee discussed judicial salary certification for State funding
reimbursement and Judge Fair provided Committee members background information on the history of
Community/
Development
Services
Committee
Finance
Committee
Packet Page 155 of 217
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 17, 2007
Page 19
the Judge’s compensation. It was the consensus of the Committee to forward a recommendation to
negotiate the salary term of the contract to keep the City eligible for court improvement account funds to
the full Council as a consent item. Councilmember Wambolt reported the Committee then discussed the
Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds School District for the School Resource Officer which provides for a
50% salary reimbursement. Committee members recommended approval and this item was approved as
Consent Agenda Item E this evening.
Public Safety Committee
Councilmember Dawson reported the Committee reviewed a draft graffiti ordinance. The Committee
agreed some of the issues contained in the ordinance were inappropriate for Edmonds such as requiring
businesses to keep graffiti implements behind the counter, not sell graffiti implements to minors, etc., but
should be forwarded to the full Council for a public hearing. A public hearing will be held in August.
She noted Snohomish County was hosting a graffiti summit on July 26 at 8:30 a.m. She asked Mayor
Haakenson to have staff attend and encouraged any interested Councilmembers and/or the public to
attend. The next item the Committee discussed was the judicial salary certification for State funding
reimbursement. She explained for the City to be eligible for State reimbursement, the Municipal Court
Judge must be an elected position and the salary must be equivalent to 95% of a District Court Judge’s
salary prorated by the number of hours worked. Raising the Municipal Court Judge’s salary would result
in a net financial gain to the City in 2007 but due to uncertainty with the reimbursement in the future, that
may not be the case in 2008. The City Attorney confirmed the salary could be reduced if the
reimbursement was not available and the Committee recommended an ordinance establishing a base
salary be scheduled on a future Consent Agenda. The final item, request for a contract amendment from
the City Prosecutor, was pulled from the agenda with a recommendation that staff negotiate with the City
prosecutor on any contractual issues and schedule the matter on a future Committee agenda if necessary.
13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson had no report.
14. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Olson wished Mayor Haakenson a belated Happy Birthday on July 14. She reminded
the public of the Concerts in the Park at 3:00 - 4:00 in City Park, announcing this weekend’s performer
would be Merchant of Venice.
Councilmember Dawson commented in response to a suggestion during audience comments regarding
Boards/Commissions term limits, explaining term limits may have been eliminated due to State
requirements of the LEOFF1 Disability Board that requires members be Police and Fire LEOFF1
members. She pointed out there were few remaining LEOFF1 members who were willing to serve on this
Board and there was a fairly steep learning curve. If term limits were established for that Board, the City
may be unable to meet the State’s requirements. With regard to other Boards/Commissions, the Council
always had the ability not to renew a member.
Councilmember Dawson also suggested discussion be scheduled on a future agenda regarding the
Council’s involvement in making appointments to Boards/Commissions rather than confirming the
Mayor’s selection.
15. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:56 p.m.
Public Safety
Committee
Concerts in the
Park
Boards/
Commissions
Term Limits
Packet Page 156 of 217
AM-1132 2.G.
2007 Second Quarter Budget Amendment
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Debra Sharp
Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
2007 Second Quarter Budget Amendment.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve attached ordinance.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In governmental budgeting, expenditures may take place up to the amount appropriated in the
current budget. Financial activity impacting appropriation levels are brought before the Edmonds
City Council on a quarterly basis in the form of a budget amendment ordinance.
The second quarter 2007 budget amendment contains a total of 13 proposed adjustments, seven of
which have previously been before Council including the 2007 Bond Issue. There are six new
items for Council to consider. The first item is a transfer from the non-departmental retirement
reserve to the appropriate departments for vacation and sick leave payouts due to retirements and
resignations. The next three items are increases in General Fund expenditures for police overtime,
police benefits and ALS supplies. The expenditure increases are offset by grant revenue received
from the State of Washington. The final two items are contributions to revenue. The first is a
General Fund donation which is for web software for the Discovery Program and the second
donation is recorded in the Parks Capital Fund for the skateboard park.
Overall, General Fund requests total $811,173 of which $566,644 will be funded by donations,
grant revenue, bond proceeds and interfund transfers. The net impact to the General Fund's ending
cash is a decrease of $244,529.
Non-General Fund requests total $4,629,985 all of which will be funded either by private
donations, interfund transfers or bond proceeds. The net impact to Non-General Fund ending cash
is an increase of $518,669.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Packet Page 157 of 217
Attachments
Link: 2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Dan Clements 08/16/2007 11:08 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 11:26 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/16/2007 11:44 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 03:29 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debra
Sharp
Started On: 08/15/2007 04:13
PM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 158 of 217
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3613 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund
Transfers and increases in appropriations; and
WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is
transferred from one fund to another; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations
and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and
federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2007
Budget; and
WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified;
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 3613 adopting the final budget for the
fiscal year 2007 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in “Exhibit A” adopted herein
by reference.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take
L:\PRODUCTIONDB\CCOUNCIL\0016_1132_2007 SECOND AMENDING ORDINANCE.DOC
Packet Page 159 of 217
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of
the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY ___
W. SCOTT SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
2
Packet Page 160 of 217
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 3613 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND
EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________,2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
3
Packet Page 161 of 217
EXHIBIT“A:” BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND
2007 2007
FUND FUND BEGINNING REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING
NO. DESCRIPTION CASH CASH
001 GENERAL FUND 3,551,328 30,451,897 32,929,566 1,073,659
006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 1,927,600 0 0 1,927,600
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 338,670 476,095 497,250 317,515
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 46,260 61,883 89,213 18,930
111 STREET FUND 101,683 1,273,029 1,343,834 30,878
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 793,490 2,136,696 2,246,699 683,487
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 0 625,000 625,000 0
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 247,138 1,760,725 1,729,510 278,353
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 204,625 65,930 103,250 167,305
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 15,847 600 0 16,447
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 55,268 63,625 66,625 52,268
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 71,574 18,600 18,000 72,174
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 8,303 2,740 3,200 7,843
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 26,941 17,035 21,800 22,176
125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 4,996,514 1,517,500 4,508,200 2,005,814
126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 198,648 1,470,000 901,715 766,933
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 148,875 16,260 12,866 152,269
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 11,000 316,000 327,000 0
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 160,240 261,214 180,559 240,895
131 FIRE DONATIONS 13,778 6,838 0 20,616
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 0 435,000 420,000 15,000
211 LID FUND CONTROL 1,766 351,000 345,300 7,466
213 LID GUARANTY FUND 41,529 2,000 0 43,529
234 LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 415,710 415,710 0
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 4,787,026 14,434,776 15,425,653 3,796,149
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 2,666,800 8,095,805 7,861,000 2,901,605
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 1,121,321 2,989,675 3,433,915 677,081
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 3,739,375 2,209,566 2,718,714 3,230,227
601 PARKS TRUST FUND 124,908 4,000 0 128,908
610 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 323,949 60,126 0 384,075
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 283,727 100,368 113,000 271,095
621 SPECIAL LIBRARY 0 0 0 0
623 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 14,937 21,200 20,000 16,137
Totals 26,023,120 69,660,893 76,357,579 19,326,434
4
Packet Page 162 of 217
EXHIBIT “B”: BUDGET AMENDMENTS BY EXPENDITURE
ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. 2007
FUND FUND 3613 3637 Amended
NO. DESCRIPTION 11/21/2006 4/17/2007 Budget
001 GENERAL FUND 32,026,798 91,595 811,173 0 32,929,566
006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 0 0 0 0 0
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 497,250 0 0 0 497,250
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 89,213 0 0 0 89,213
111 STREET FUND 1,340,217 0 3,617 0 1,343,834
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2,215,699 31,000 0 0 2,246,699
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 625,000 0 0 0 625,000
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,142,460 0 587,050 0 1,729,510
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 103,250 0 0 0 103,250
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 0 0 0 0 0
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 63,625 3,000 0 0 66,625
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 18,000 0 0 0 18,000
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,200 0 0 0 3,200
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 21,800 0 0 0 21,800
125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 4,508,200 0 0 0 4,508,200
126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 880,661 0 21,054 0 901,715
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 4,866 8,000 0 0 12,866
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 316,000 11,000 0 0 327,000
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 180,559 0 0 0 180,559
131 FIRE DONATIONS 0 0 0 0 0
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 420,000 0 0 0 420,000
211 LID FUND CONTROL 345,300 0 0 0 345,300
213 LID GUARANTY FUND 0 0 0 0 0
234 LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND 415,710 0 0 0 415,710
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 13,528,375 104,500 1,792,778 0 15,425,653
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 7,861,000 0 0 0 7,861,000
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 1,286,844 0 2,147,071 0 3,433,915
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,610,299 30,000 78,415 0 2,718,714
601 PARKS TRUST FUND 0 0 0 0 0
610 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 0 0 0 0 0
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 113,000 0 0 0 113,000
621 SPECIAL LIBRARY 0 0 0 0 0
623 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 20,000 0 0 0 20,000
Totals 70,637,326 279,095 5,441,158 0 76,357,579
5
Packet Page 163 of 217
EXHIBIT “C”: BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL
Department Category Debit Credit Description
Items Previously Before Council
Police Foundation Donation 39,202
Police Interfund Transfer 39,202
Funds received from the Police Foundation
for a new K-9 patrol vehicle
Internal Service Fund Interfund Transfer 39,202
Internal Service Fund Equipment 39,202 Purchase of the new K-9 vehicle
Information Services Equipment 38,000
Ending Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance 38,000
Increase equipment line - purchase back-up
network servers.
Information Services Equipment 56,200
Ending Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance 56,200
Increase equipment line - purchase fiber
optic switching, routing & cabling
equipment
Police/Fire Department Grant Revenue 9,000
Police/Fire Department Ending Fund Balance 8,000
Police/Fire Department Interfund Transfer 1,000
Police/Fire Department Interfund Transfer 1,000
Police/Fire Department Ending Fund Balance 1,000
Additional funds received from Snohomish
County for the fire boat
Police Interfund Transfer 39,213
Police Small Equipment 39,213
Equipment Rental Interfund Transfer 39,213
Equipment Rental Ending Fund Balance 39,213
Police computer replacement funds
transferred from equiment fund to GF
Non-Departmental Proceeds of other LTD 174,000 Remove ST financing
Non-Departmental 2006 HVAC Interest 25,581 Remove ST financing
Non-Departmental 2007 LTGO Principal 34,716 Remove ST financing
Non-Departmental 2007 LTGO Interest 8,679 Remove ST financing
Non-Departmental Ending Fund Balance 105,024 Remove ST financing
Non-Departmental GO Bond Proceeds 640,819 Record Bond Proceeds
Non-Departmental 2006 HVAC Principal 626,108 Record Bond Proceeds
Non-Departmental Debt Issue Costs 14,711 Record Bond Proceeds
Non-Departmental 2007 LTGO Principal 22,542 Record Debt Service Payments
Non-Departmental 2007 LTGO Interest 24,263 Record Debt Service Payments
Non-Departmental Ending Fund Balance 46,805 Record Debt Service Payments
Street Fund 2007 LTGO Principal 1,742 Record Debt Service Payments
Street Fund 2007 LTGO Interest 1,875 Record Debt Service Payments
Street Fund Ending Fund Balance 3,617 Record Debt Service Payments
Facilities Maintenance 2007 LTGO HVAC 587,050 Record Bond Proceeds
Facilities Maintenance Construction 578,931 Record Bond Proceeds
Facilities Maintenance Debt Issue Costs 8,119 Record Bond Proceeds
REET 1 2007 LTGO Principal 10,140 Record Debt Service Payments
REET 1 2007 LTGO Interest 10,914 Record Debt Service Payments
REET 1 Ending Fund Balance 21,054 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund Debt Issue Costs 26,243 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund Debt Issue Costs 4,233 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund Debt Issue Costs 4,233 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund GO Bond Proceeds 1,699,709 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund Interfund Transfer 1,665,000 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Principal 42,718 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Interest 45,979 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Principal 1,170 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Interest 1,259 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Principal 936 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Interest 1,007 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund Ending Fund Balance 93,069 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund Interfund Transfer 1,665,000 Record Proceed Transfer
Utility Fund Proceeds of other LTD 900,000 Record Proceed Transfer
6
Packet Page 164 of 217
Utility Fund Ending Fund Balance 765,000 Record Proceed Transfer
Utility Fund GO Bond Proceeds 2,041,693 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund Construction 1,322,093 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund Debt Issue Costs 19,600 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund Bond Principal 700,000 Record Bond Proceeds
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Principal 50,752 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund 2007 LTGO Interest 54,626 Record Debt Service Payments
Utility Fund Ending Fund Balance 105,378 Record Debt Service Payments
New Items for Council to Consider
Information Services Salaries 19,000
Police Salaries 8,800
Parks and Recreation Salaries 15,500
Public Works Salaries 6,000
Fire Salaries 20,700
Police Salaries 19,500
Police Salaries 37,000
Non-Departmental Benefits 120,000
Ending Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance 6,500
Salary payouts for retirements and
resignations transferred from non-
departmental to the various departments.
The excess costs reduce ending fund
balance.
Police Grant Revenue 7,046
Police Patrol Overtime 3,059
Police Patrol Benefits 417
Police Traffic Overtime 3,137
Police Traffic Benefits 433
Increase in overtime and benefits due to
WTSC Speeding Emphasis Grant
Police Grant Revenue 2,600
Police Patrol Overtime 829
Police Patrol Benefits 113
Police Traffic Overtime 1,459
Police Traffic Benefits 199
Increase in overtime and benefits due to
WTSC Seatbelt Enforcement Grant
Fire Grant Revenue 1,439
Fire Supplies 1,439
Received grant money from Dept of Health
to purchase ALS supplies.
Parks and Recreation Donations 1,325
Parks and Recreation Supplies 1,325
Hubbard Family Foundation Grant -
software for the Discovery Program
Parks and Recreation Donations 15,000
Parks and Recreation Ending Fund Balance 15,000
Edmonds Police Foundation Donation -
Skateboard Park
7
Packet Page 165 of 217
AM-1133 2.H.
Ordinance for Constitutionally Protected Events
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Dan Clements Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Ordinance to establish a procedure for Constitutionally Protected Events.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
During the annual Washington Cities' Insurance Agency audit of the City's insurance and risk
management programs, it was noted that Edmonds did not have a formal policy for processing
Fourteenth Amendment (Freedom of Speech) event applications. This ordinance establishes a
procedure for these applications.
Previous Council Action
Approved by the Finance Committee on August 15.
Narrative
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Events_Procedure
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 05:12 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/15/2007 05:25 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 09:02 AM APRV
Form Started By: Dan
Clements
Started On: 08/15/2007 04:22
PM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 166 of 217
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 4.98
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED EVENTS TO
ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR APPROVING, CONDITIONING,
AND DENYING PERMITS FOR EVENTS THAT ARE
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED INTENDED
PRIMARILY FOR THE COMMUNICATION OR EXPRESSION
OF IDEAS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND FIXING
A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, certain events that attract a large number of people, whether on
public or private property, impact both vehicular and pedestrian traffic causing congestion on
public streets, rights-of-ways, and other public facilities; and
WHEREAS, certain events that attract a large number of people, whether on
public or private property, impact the need for City-provided emergency services, such as police,
fire or medical aid; and
WHEREAS, sometimes said events are constitutionally protected although certain
regulation and guideline by the City are permitted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it appropriate to establish criteria for
permitting such events, while recognizing our right to organize and participate in constitutionally
protected events, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A new Chapter 4.98 ECC Constitutionally Protected Events. is hereby
adopted in Title 4 ECC Licenses. to read as follows:
Chapter 4.98
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/} - 1 -
Packet Page 167 of 217
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED EVENTS
Sections:
4.98.010 Definitions.
4.98.020 Permit Required.
4.98.030 Grounds For Denial Of Application.
4.98.040 Permit Conditions - Appeal.
4.98.050 Revocation Of Permits.
4.98.060 Violation – Penalty.
4.98.070 Savings Clause.
4.98.010 Definitions.
A. “Constitutionally Protected Events” include any event, such as political or religious
activity, intended primarily for the communication or expression of ideas that is to be
conducted on public property or on a public rights-of-way; and, also, any such event held
on private property which would have a direct significant impact on traffic congestion; or
traffic flow to and from the event over public streets or rights-of-ways; or which would
significantly impact public streets or rights-of-way near the event; or which would
significantly impact the need for City-provided emergency services, such as police, fire
or medical aid.
B. “Use” shall mean to construct, erect, or maintain in, on, over or under any street, right-of-
way, park or other public place, any building, structure, sign, equipment or scaffolding, to
deface any public right-of-way by painting, spraying or writing on the surface thereof, or
to otherwise occupy in such a manner as to obstruct the normal public use of any public
street, right-of-way, park or other public place within the City, including a use related to
special events.
4.98.020 Permit Required.
A. A permit from the City is required for any Constitutionally Protected Events as defined in
this Chapter. Such permit shall be in lieu of any other city permit, including but not
limited to parade, street use and park use permits as they may be required by ordinance.
B. Contents of application: The applicant must file the application in writing on a form
supplied by the City to the license officer, setting forth:
1. Contact information of the applicant, including but not limited to name, telephone
number and address;
2. the date, time, and expected duration of the event;
3. The probable number of participants;
4. The place or route of the event, including a map and written narrative of the
proposed route;
5. A description of all public ways proposed to be blocked;
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/} - 2 -
Packet Page 168 of 217
6. A description of the measures to be taken to protect participants and the general
public from injury, including traffic control and crowd control, emergency
medical services, fire and life safety services and emergency communication
systems;
7. A description of the measures to be taken to insure cleanup of any litter or
damage resulting from the event;
8. The number and location of portable sanitation facilities, if any;
9. A certification that the applicant will be financially responsible for any cost to the
City resulting from breach of any condition of the permit;
10. A certification that the applicant will not sponsor or encourage any commercial
activity unrelated to First Amendment rights during the event;
11. A description of the types and number of vehicles to be used in the special event;
12. Insurance and surety bond information, if any;
13. Any other additional information required to ensure public health, safety and
welfare.
C. A Constitutionally Protected Event permit is not required for the following:
1. Parades, athletic events or other special events that occur
exclusively on City property and are sponsored or conducted in full
or in part by the City.
2. Funeral and wedding processions.
3. Groups required by law to be so assembled.
4. Gatherings of 30 or fewer people in a City park, unless merchandise or services
are offered for sale or trade.
6. Other similar events and activities which do not directly affect or use City
services of property.
D. Any person desiring to obtain a Constitutionally Protected Event permit shall apply for
such a permit by filing an application with the City at least sixty (60) days prior to the
date on which the event is to occur.
E. Waiver of Application Deadline: Upon a showing of good cause or at the discretion of
the City, the City shall consider an application that is filed after the filing deadline if
there is sufficient time to process and investigate the application and obtain police and
other City services for the event. Good cause can be demonstrated by the applicant
showing that the circumstance that gave rise to the permit application did not reasonably
allow the participants to file within the time prescribed.
4.98.030 Grounds For Denial Of Application.
A. The City may deny an application for a Constitutionally Protected Event permit if:
1. The applicant provides information that is false, misleading, or nonexistent in any
material detail; the applicant fails to complete the application or to supply other
required information of documents; or the applicant declares or shows an
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/} - 3 -
Packet Page 169 of 217
unwillingness or inability to comply with the reasonable terms or conditions
contained in the proposed permit;
2. The proposed event would conflict with another proximate event, interfere with
construction or maintenance work in the immediate vicinity, or unreasonably
infringe upon the rights of abutting property; or
3. The proposed event would unreasonably disrupt the orderly or safe circulation of
traffic as would present an unreasonable risk of injury or damage to the public.
4. The proposed event would engage in, advocate, or encourage illegal activities that
threaten and endanger public health, safety and welfare.
B. In the event subsection 2 or 3, above applies, the City shall offer the applicant the
opportunity to submit an alternative date or place for the proposed event before denying
the application.
4.98.040 Permit Conditions - Appeal.
A. The City may condition the issuance of a Constitutionally Protected Event permit by
imposing reasonable requirements concerning the time, place and manner of the event,
and such requirements as are necessary to protect the safety and rights of persons and
property, and the control of traffic. The following conditions apply to all Constitutionally
Protected Event permits:
1. Alteration of the time, place and manner of the event proposed on the event
application.
2. Conditions concerning the area of assembly and disbanding of an event occurring
along a route.
3. Conditions concerning accommodation of pedestrians or vehicular traffic,
including restricting the event to only a portion of the street or rights-of-way.
4. Conditions concerning cleanup and restoration of areas used for the permitted
event upon conclusion.
5. Compliance with any other applicable federal, state or local law or regulation.
B. The applicant shall have the right to appeal the denial of a permit or a permit condition.
A written Notice of Appeal shall be filed within three (3) business days after receipt or
personal delivery of a notice of denial or permit conditions from the City. Receipt of
notice of denial or permit conditions shall be presumed three days after the same is
mailed with USPS postage prepaid and certified. The written Notice of Appeal shall set
forth the specific grounds for the appeal and attach any relevant documents for
consideration. The Hearing Examiner shall hear the appeal on the record provided from
the designated City official and upon public comment given at the scheduled hearing
before the Examiner. The hearing shall be scheduled for the earliest possible hearing
date after receipt of a timely and proper Notice of Appeal. The decision of the Hearing
Examiner shall be final.
4.98.050 Revocation Of Permits.
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/} - 4 -
Packet Page 170 of 217
A. Any permit issued under this ordinance may be summarily revoked by the City at any
time when, by reason of disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency or exigent
circumstances, the City determines the safety of the public or property requires such
immediate revocation. The City may also summarily revoke any permit issued pursuant
to this ordinance if the City finds that the permit has been issued based upon false
information or when the permittee exceeds the scope of the permit or fails to comply with
any condition of the permit.
B. Notice of such action revoking a permit shall be delivered in writing to the permittee by
personal service or certified mail at the address specified by the permittee in the
application. To the extent that written notice by personal service or certified mail is not
likely to achieve timely actual notice, any other reasonable form of notification intended
to achieve the same shall suffice.
4.98.060 Violation – Penalty.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to sponsor or conduct an event requiring a
Constitutionally Protected Event permit pursuant to this ordinance unless a valid permit
has been issued and remains in effect for the event. It is unlawful for any person to
participate in such an event with the knowledge that the sponsor of the event has not been
issued a required, valid permit or with knowledge that a once valid permit has expired or
been revoked.
B. The Constitutionally Protected Event permit authorizes the permittee/sponsor to conduct
only such an event as is described in the permit, and in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the permit. It is unlawful for the permittee/sponsor to willfully violate the
terms and conditions of the permit, or for any event participant with knowledge thereof to
willfully violate the terms and conditions of the permit or to continue with the event if the
permit is revoked or expired.
C. Any person or organization violating the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be subject to a penalty of a fine of not
more than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment of not more than ninety days, or both
such fine and imprisonment.
4.98.070 Savings Clause.
If any section, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/} - 5 -
Packet Page 171 of 217
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is an administrative and legislative act not subject to
referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved
summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. Scott Snyder
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/} - 6 -
Packet Page 172 of 217
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 4.98
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED EVENTS TO
ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR APPROVING, CONDITIONING,
AND DENYING PERMITS FOR EVENTS THAT ARE
CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED INTENDED
PRIMARILY FOR THE COMMUNICATION OR EXPRESSION
OF IDEAS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND FIXING
A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________,2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{BFP665879.DOC;2/00006.900030/}
- 7 -
Packet Page 173 of 217
AM-1134 2.I.
95th Place W Storm Drainage Improvement Contract Award
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Dave Gebert Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Report on bids opened on August 14, 2007 for the 95th Place West Storm Drainage Improvement
Project and award of contract to Interwest Construction, Inc. ($112,790).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council award the contract for the 95th Place West Storm Drainage Improvement Project to
Interwest Construction, Inc. for $112,790.
Previous Council Action
On July 24, 2007, Council authorized staff to call for bids on the 95th Place West Storm Drainage
Improvement Project.
Narrative
This project is located at the intersection of 95th Place W and Edmonds Way (SR 104) in the
Edmonds Way Basin. This project is a portion of the 93rd Avenue W. Storm Drainage
Improvements project. The existing drainage system is undersized for the large storm events, and
the proposed improvement will provide much greater capacity compared to the existing storm
system in place. Also, the current system flows through a private property, and the new system will
be confined to the City right-of-way. It is a high priority to complete this project before winter
weather.
Using the Small Works Roster process, Staff solicited bids on July 31, 2007 from five construction
contractors. On August 14, 2007 the City received 2 bids for the 95th Place W. Storm Drainage
Improvement Project. The bid tabulation is attached. The low bid in the amount of $112,790 was
submitted by Interwest Construction, Inc. The second bid was in the amount of $139,040. The
engineer’s estimate was $90,682. After a review of the differences between the engineer’s estimate
and the Interwest Construction bid, it was determined that the Interwest bid is reasonable
considering the degree of difficulty associated with working in the very busy SR104 (Edmonds
Way), the 9 foot trench depth required for this project, and the variables associated with estimating
such work. A review of the low bidder’s record and references was also satisfactory.
There is sufficient funding for this project. The adopted 2007 capital budget includes $760,000 for
the 93rd Avenue W./96th Avenue West Storm Improvement Project, which includes the 95th Place
West drainage improvements.
Fiscal Impact
Packet Page 174 of 217
Attachments
Link: Bid Tab
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Development Services Duane Bowman 08/17/2007 08:50 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/17/2007 08:54 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/17/2007 08:55 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/17/2007 08:56 AM APRV
Form Started By: Dave Gebert Started On: 08/15/2007 04:43
PM
Final Approval Date: 08/17/2007
Packet Page 175 of 217
SCHEDULE A - Friar Tuck Lane
ITEM
NO.
APPROX.
QUANTITY UNITS DESCRIPTION OF ITEM
UNIT PRICE
Dlrs. Cents
TOTAL PRICE
Dlrs. Cents
UNIT PRICE
Dlrs. Cents
TOTAL PRICE
Dlrs. Cents
UNIT PRICE
Dlrs. Cents
TOTAL PRICE
Dlrs. Cents
1 1 LS MOBILIZATION 5,000.00 5,000.00 $7,500.00 7,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
2 1 LS SHORING & TRENCH SAFETY 7,000.00 7,000.00 $5,000.00 5,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
3 101 LF 30” DIAMETER HDPE STORM DRAIN PIPE 250.00 25,250.00 $350.00 35,350.00 $200.00 $20,200.00
4 1 EA 84” DIAMETER TYPE II CATCH BASINS 15,000.00 15,000.00 $30,000.00 30,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
5 1 EA CONNECTION TO EXISTING 72”
DIAMETER CATCH BASIN 2,500.00 2,500.00 $5,000.00 5,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
6 50 LF IMPORT BACKFILL MATERIAL 90.00 4,500.00 $105.00 5,250.00 $100.00 $5,000.00
7 101 LF TEMPORARY TRENCH PATCH 110.00 11,110.00 $20.00 2,020.00 $40.00 $4,040.00
8 20 SF FOUNDATION STABILIZATION 140.00 2,800.00 $40.00 800.00 $100.00 $2,000.00
9 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 9,000.00 9,000.00 $10,500.00 10,500.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00
10 1 LS REMOVE SECTION OF EXIST. 18” CMP &
FILL ABANDONED SECTIONS WITH 4,000.00 4,000.00 $3,500.00 3,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
11 50 LF 3” ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
(ACP) PATCH 17.00 850.00 $35.00 1,750.00 $150.00 $7,500.00
12 51 LF 12” ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
(ACP) PATCH 72.00 3,672.00 $120.00 6,120.00 $300.00 $15,300.00
SUBTOTAL 90,682.00 SUBTOTAL 112,790.00 SUBTOTAL 139,040.00
8.9% Tax N/A 8.9% Tax N/A 8.9% Tax N/A
TOTAL 90,682.00 TOTAL 112,790.00 TOTAL 139,040.00
* Failed to provide unit price for each line item
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Bid Tabulation
95th Place West Storm Drain Improvement Project
Project No. E4FE/c185
Earthwork Enterprises Inc.Interwest Construction, Inc.
Packet Page 176 of 217
AM-1121 2.J.
Proposed Resolution thanking Student Representative Shaun Callahan
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Council President Pritchard Olson Time:Consent
Department:City Council Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proposed Resolution thanking Student Representative Shaun Callahan.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Proposed Resolution thanking Student Representative Shaun Callahan.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Callahan Resolution
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 10:17 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/15/2007 10:20 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 10:28 AM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 08/03/2007 09:56
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/15/2007
Packet Page 177 of 217
No: 1151
A Resolution of the Edmonds City Council Commending
Shaun Callahan
for his Service as a Student Member of the Edmonds City Council
Whereas, Shaun Callahan, a student at Edmonds-Woodway High School, was selected to
serve as a Student Representative of the Edmonds City Council; and
Whereas, Shaun Callahan, served as a Student Representative of the City Council during
the Spring/Summer Term of 2007; and
Whereas, during his tenure as Student Representative, Shaun Callahan participated fully
during the comment period of the Council meeting, had exemplary attendance, and
managed all this while attending school and participating in various school activities,
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that Shaun Callahan be commended for his
participation in city government in Edmonds during his term in office, and
Be It Further Resolved that the City Council and the Mayor hereby extend their best wishes to
Shaun in his future endeavors and express the hope that he will continue to
contribute his fine talents to the democratic process of government in the City of
Edmonds and elsewhere.
Now, Therefore, Be It Passed, Approved, And Adopted This 20st day of
August, 2007.
Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember David J. Orvis, Councilmember
Attest: City Clerk
Packet Page 178 of 217
AM-1130 3.
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Council President Pritchard Olson Time:5 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Presentation of Resolution and plaque to Student Representative Shaun Callahan.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Presentation of resolution and plaque to Edmonds-Woodway High School Student Representative
Shaun Callahan.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 10:17 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/15/2007 10:20 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 10:28 AM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 08/15/2007 10:10
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/15/2007
Packet Page 179 of 217
AM-1125 4.
Acceptance of Point Edwards public easements.
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:10 Minutes
Department:Development Services Type:
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acceptance of Point Edwards Public Easements.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the Mayor to sign the easements to allow them to be recorded.
Previous Council Action
The City Council, on July 2, 2002, adopted Ordinance 3402 creating the MP-Hillside zones
covering the former Unocal property. Later on July 23, 2002, the City Council passed Ordinance
3411 approving the contract rezone covering the upper hillside property, paving the way for the
development that is now occurring known as the Point Edwards condominium project.
Narrative
As part of the approval of the Point Edwards condominium project on the former Unocal property,
the applicant was required to to provide easements for public viewpoints and for a detention pond
vehicle access. There are three viewpoints on Pine Street and one overlooking the Edmonds
marsh. The attached easements comply with the requirements established by the Point Edwards
project approval.
As part of the decision and approval of the master plan, the roads within the development were to
be remain private and were designed to private standards. Maintenance of the interior roads will be
the responsibility of the Pt. Edwards homeowners association. The development however was
required, per the master plan, to provide public viewpoints off Pine Street and above the Edmonds
Marsh for the benefit of the public. In addition there is a stormwater pond that the city public
works needs access to which is the reason for the utility easement.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 -PT Edwards Easement
Link: Exhibit 2 - Pt. Edwards Viewpoint easement
Link: Exhibit 3 - Pt. Edwards Utility Easement
Link: Exhibit 4 - Pt. Edwards Site Plan
Form Routing/Status
Packet Page 180 of 217
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 06:17 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/16/2007 09:22 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 03:29 PM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 08/10/2007 09:15
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 181 of 217
Packet Page 182 of 217
Packet Page 183 of 217
Packet Page 184 of 217
Packet Page 185 of 217
Packet Page 186 of 217
Packet Page 187 of 217
Packet Page 188 of 217
Packet Page 189 of 217
Packet Page 190 of 217
Packet Page 191 of 217
Packet Page 192 of 217
Packet Page 193 of 217
Packet Page 194 of 217
Packet Page 195 of 217
Packet Page 196 of 217
Packet Page 197 of 217
Packet Page 198 of 217
Packet Page 199 of 217
Packet Page 200 of 217
Packet Page 201 of 217
Packet Page 202 of 217
Packet Page 203 of 217
Packet Page 204 of 217
Packet Page 205 of 217
Packet Page 206 of 217
Packet Page 207 of 217
Packet Page 208 of 217
Packet Page 209 of 217
Packet Page 210 of 217
AM-1137 5.
Report on Development Services Actions
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:10 Minutes
Department:Development Services Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on staff's actions regarding the July 26, 2007 Special Meeting of the
Community/Development Services Committee.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
On July 26, 2007, the Community Services/Development Services Committee held a special
meeting to take comments concerning building permit application time lines and any other topics
pertinent to the Committee’s area of responsibility.
Narrative
The Development Services Department management staff is reviewing the minutes from the July
26, 2007 CS/DS committee meeting and will be reporting back to the CS/DS Committee on
September 11, 2007. The vast majority of the issues raised at the July 26, 2007 meeting are
administrative and not legislative issues.
One key area of concern raised was timeliness of permit reviews. As the City Council is aware, the
Development Services Department has lost a number of positions within the department due to
retirement or higher paying jobs elsewhere. The result has been increased permit review time
lines. On August 15, 2007, the department tried an experiment to see if we could put a dent in our
overdue permit backlog.
We essentially closed the permit counter and phones to our plan reviewers and did not do
engineering inspections. We did continue to do building inspections and completed an
already scheduled pre-application conference. We ran a report to determine the number of overdue
reviews on Tuesday afternoon and then another report on Thursday morning to see how productive
we were.
The results of the experiment were very positive. There were a total of 79 overdue reviews before
the closure. After the closure, 43 overdue reviews remained, a 54% reduction. We intend to repeat
the closure on August 22, 2007 to finish off the backlog and spend time on non-overdue permit
reviews.
Packet Page 211 of 217
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - 72607 CSDS minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/17/2007 08:38 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/17/2007 08:40 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/17/2007 08:54 AM APRV
Form Started By: Duane
Bowman
Started On: 08/16/2007 09:32
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/17/2007
Packet Page 212 of 217
M I N U T E S
Community Services/Development Services Committee Meeting
Special Meeting
July 26, 2007
Elected Officials Present: Members of the Public Present:
Mauri Moore, Council member Tony Shapiro
Richard Marin, Committee Chair Steve Waite
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President* Eric Theusen
(*Arrived at 8:40 p.m.) Rick Cuevas
Staff Present: Bea O’Rourke
Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director Rob Michel
Sandy Chase, City Clerk Scott Schlumberger
John Bissell
1. Public comment related to legislative issues concerning building permit application
timelines and any other topics pertinent to the Committee’s area of responsibility.
Committee Chair Marin convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. He stated that he was particularly
interested in looking for areas of concern that the City Council can address legislatively. He
commented that the Committee is here to listen to everything; everyone will have a chance to talk,
and there is no particular order.
Councilmember Moore explained she requested this hearing because since being elected she has
heard stories from home owners, small and big business owners, about the problems, delays and
the good things that were going on related to the Development Services Department. It is the most
talked about department because there is so much at stake in the permitting process. Ms. Moore
wanted the chance for at least one other Councilmember to gather facts along with her so that
issues could be put on the table to see if there is anything the Council can do to help the process
along.
The citizens present raised the following issues:
• Working relationship has eroded to point of no confidence; lack of trust.
• Lack of properly managed staff; staff not given a chance to grow.
• Hesitancy in dealing with this department in a forthright manner because of fear of
retribution.
• Undue harassment of legitimate businesses (tenants) in a fashion that seems unreasonable.
Difficulties experienced by tenants trying to locate in Edmonds.
• The staff on the second floor are operating in a vacuum and do not understand the
cost/value involved in delaying a project to the applicant.
• “Subject to Field Inspection Permit” needed for projects that are simple (over the counter
permit). This concept is absent in the department.
Packet Page 213 of 217
CS/DS Committee Minutes July 26, 2007 Page 2
• Concept of “equity” is used in the department for all permits, taking applications in fair order.
However, some permits require lengthy review, some less. If it is going to take a long period
of time, people will do work without permits and then there are life safety issues.
• Turnover of staff; no institutional memory. This leads to consistency problems.
• Policy and procedure manuals in writing are needed.
• Check lists needed.
• If applicant does not like Planner’s interpretation of the Code, the applicant must appeal the
matter to the Hearing Examiner, and pay money to find out the interpretation was wrong.
• Suggest use of technology to help filter the process to avoid inconsistencies, to make it more
predictable for the builders and the city.
• Review periods need to be shorter.
• Training issue – understanding case law. Read the material in the Code; do not expound on
it; if vague or ambiguous, it goes in favor of the applicant unless there is a written policy.
• Time, consistency, relevance and transparency are the key issues. Applicant needs to
understand what the department is looking for. Cited examples of drawings being delayed
time after time for reasons that are not relevant.
• Architectural Design Board (ADB) is loaded with so much malarkey that does not pertain to
the objective of the ADB (example, preliminary drainage report needs to be submitted for
ADB review).
• Concern with the minutia that staff provides the ADB that the ADB does not want to get
bogged down with.
• We have asked for two reviews. It all comes down to time.
• There is a good opportunity with the new planners for training regarding customer attitude,
being consistent.
• All present stated they have never had just two reviews. It has become extremely
complicated.
• The three divisions in the department do not communicate with each other.
• Minutia required by Edmonds to be included on drawings, not required by other cities.
• Requested to review check lists, but was denied (claiming it was project work product).
• The pre-application process is appreciated for its thoroughness.
• Planning and Engineering Bulletins are at best shorthand; with submittal, everything on the
bulletin is covered; should not have to wait 28 days for a completeness letter.
• Suggested there be a city attorney accessible at the counter; less expensive than contract
law firm.
• Suggested certain planners work on smaller permits, and then more experienced planners
work on the bigger permits.
• Concern with the hours the department is open (opens at 9 a.m., closes from 12 to 1 p.m.;
closes at 4 p.m., permits cannot be submitted after 3:30 p.m.). It is unusual that a city would
restrict contact. Has there been an increase in productivity by the staff not dealing with
citizens during these periods? No other city shuts down like this.
• The public cannot use the restroom on the second floor of city hall. Why?
• Applying for a business license as a tenant ended up being drawn into a mire of issues with
the department.
• What kind of welcome do we have for businesses coming to our city? Economic
development element.
• Offer to assist with the Code rewrite that is currently taking place; there are a lot of talented
people in the community who could assist. Let’s work together.
• Question about how Building permit fees are used? Are the fees balanced fairly? Interested
in obtaining enough funds into the department if it is needed to help solve problems with
delays in approval of permits.
Packet Page 214 of 217
CS/DS Committee Minutes July 26, 2007 Page 3
• The difficulty in finding employees was noted; however, the department needs to be dynamic
and run like a business.
• Employees are in need of training in dealing with customers; employees are told to walk
away from an irate customer; they have missed an opportunity to win someone over.
• Some of the reasons for the attrition that is occurring with staff has to do with work
conditions.
• “Common sense” is not used; training needed.
Councilmembers Moore and Marin summarized the following issues as follow-up:
• Look at the employee training policy.
• Citizen committee to be formed to help rewrite the Code (Chapters 18 and 20).
• Check lists – where is it? Can it be put on line?
• Explore a policy about how many reviews an application goes through before a meeting is
held.
• Policy and Procedure Manual.
• Concept of “Subject to Field Inspection.”
• Check list as part of Policy Manual.
• Permit Coordinator and Planner on duty with check list for a 10 to 15 minute review.
• Solicit input from this group.
• Review Renton and Tacoma Mission Statements.
The meeting adjourned at 8:57 p.m.
Packet Page 215 of 217
AM-1128 7.
Report on City Council Committee Meetings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:08/20/2007
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committee Meetings.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the August 14, 2007 Finance Committee Meeting Minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Finance Committee Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 08/15/2007 10:26 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 08/15/2007 02:20 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 08/16/2007 09:02 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 08/13/2007 09:00
AM
Final Approval Date: 08/16/2007
Packet Page 216 of 217
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
August 14, 2007
6:00 PM
L:\PRODUCTIONDB\CCOUNCIL\0032_1128_8-14-2007 FIN. MINUTES.DOC
Present: Councilmember Ron Wambolt
Councilmember Dave Orvis
Staff: Mayor Haakenson
Dan Clements
Debra Sharp
Kathleen Junglov
Public: Roger Hertrich
Committee Chair Orvis called the meeting to order at 6:05 PM.
Item A: Second Quarter Budget Report
Kathleen Junglov provided an overview of the Second Quarter Budget Report (which
included some information through July). Additional information was provided on REET
receipts through August. For information only, no further action required.
Item B: Second Quarter Budget Amendment
Debra Sharp reviewed the second quarter budget amendment. Briefly, the amendment
included thirteen items, seven of which had previously been before council. This item was
forwarded to full Council as a consent item.
Item C: Constitutionally Protected Events Ordinance
Dan Clements briefed the committee on the history and purpose of the ordinance. This
item was forwarded to full Council as a consent item.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 PM.
Packet Page 217 of 217