The URL can be used to link to this page

2007.10.16 CC Agenda PacketAGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds October 16, 2007 7:00 p.m. Call to Order and Flag Salute 1. Approval of Agenda 2• Consent Agenda Items A. Roll Call B. AM-1201 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2007. C. AM-1205 Approval of claim checks #99341 through #99548 for October 4, 2007 in the amount of $605,453.09 and #99549 through #99718 for October 11, 2007 in the amount of $822,627.15. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #45648 through #45694 for the period September 16 through September 30, 2007 in the amount of $788,184.36. D. AM-1194 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Janet Henry ($364.00), Brad and Heather Sturgill (amount undetermined), and Diane McEachron (amount undetermined). E. AM-1197 Appropriation of additional $1,990 and authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Perteet, Inc. for the Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision project. F. AM-1198 Authorization for Mayor to sign interlocal agreement with the City of North Bend for disposal of biosolids from their wastewater treatment plant. G. AM-1199 Report on final construction costs for the Clarifier Repair Project and Council acceptance of project. H. AM-1202 Proposed Resolution repealing Resolution No. 1051 and enacting new charges and fees for the photocopying and transcription of public records. I. AM-1207 Proclamation in honor of Denim Day in Edmonds, October 17, 2007. J. AM-1208 Paramedic Training Affiliation Agreement. K. AM-1209 Professional Services Agreement - Fire Department Medical Program Director 3. AM-1204 Presentation and Public Hearing on the preferred Park Design and Master Plan for the 5.56 acre park (60 Min) site located at the Old Woodway Elementary School, 23700 104th Street SW. 4. AM-1206 Closed record review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone of the property (45 Min) located at 23601 Edmonds Way from Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW). Applicants are A.D. Shapiro Architects and Marier & Marier (File No. R-2007-53). 5. Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 6. AM-1200 Award of a construction contract to Northwestern Construction of WA, Inc. in the amount of (15 Min) $1,610,631.00 (price includes Washington State sales tax) for the Frances Anderson Center Seismic Structural Retrofit project. Packet Page 1 of 333 7. AM-1203 Report on City Council Committee Meetings. (15 Min) 8. (5 Min) Mayor's Comments 9. (15 Min) Council Comments 10. Adjourn Packet Page 2 of 333 AM-1201 Approval of 10/2/07 City Council Meeting Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: Department: Review Committee: Action: 10/ 16/2007 Sandy Chase City Clerk's Office Time: Consent Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft October 2, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes. Fiscal Impact A ffarhmanfe Link: 10-2-07 Draft City Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/09/2007 09:08 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/09/2007 09:09 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/09/2007 04:25 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Started On: 10/09/2007 09:06 Chase AM Final Approval Date: 10/09/2007 No Packet Page 3 of 333 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES October 2, 2007 Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding a legal matter, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Peggy Pritchard Olson, Council President Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember Mauri Moore, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Hilary Scheibert, Student Representative 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Al Compaan, Chief of Police Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder Mayor Haakenson advised of the request to add the following item to the Consent Agenda as Item E: "Proposed Ordinance approving a change in zoning for certain real property located at 9521 and 9531 Edmonds Way from Multi -Family Residential (RM-1.5) and Single Family Residential (RS-8) to Community Business -Edmonds Way (BC-EW); authorizing amendment to the City's Official Zoning Map; and fixing a time when the same shall become effective." COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA WITH THE ADDITION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED WITH THE ADDITION OF ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2007. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #99194 THROUGH #99340 FOR SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,373,242.17. D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM WORLDPAC ($4,869.03), AND ROY AND SUE TUCKER ($564.22). Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 2, 2007 Page 1 Packet Page 4 of 333 E. ORDINANCE NO. 3665 — APPROVING A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9521 AND 9531 EDMONDS WAY FROM MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RM-1.5) AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-8) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS-EDMONDS WAY (BC-EW); AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. PRESENTATION ON SNOHOMISH COUNTY TOMORROW BY REPRESENTATIVE BRIAN SULLIVAN. Representative Brian Sullivan explained he served as the 21s` District Representative serving Mukilteo, Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood as well as the Snohomish County Tomorrow Coordinator. He explained Snohomish County Tomorrow was a partnership and a shared vision. He displayed a chart illustrating population growth in Snohomish County from 23,000 in 1900 to 650,000 in 2006. He displayed a map illustrating significant growth in population and buildings every 20 years from 1920 to 2006, noting the map illustrated that Snohomish County was a major urban county. He advised the projected population increase in the next 10 years was 266,000. He displayed an aerial map illustrating infill and growth in Southwest Snohomish County from 1984 to 2002. He relayed Snohomish County Tomorrow's mission to adopt a publicly shared vision, including goals and policies, to guide effective growth management and to preserve Snohomish County's unique quality of life. Snohomish County Tomorrow was formed in 1989 as a voluntary association of cities and towns, prior to the adoption of the Growth management Act (GMA). He commented Snohomish County Tomorrow was the only formal city/county land use organization in Washington that met on a regular basis. He displayed a list of the membership of Snohomish County Tomorrow, advising members have agreed to conduct a collaborative planning process as required by the GMA. Snohomish County Tomorrow maintains the countywide planning policies, provides a forum for discussion and recommendation of policies, and coordinates countywide transportation planning. He described federal transportation funding via SAFETEA LU for local safety improvements that is distributed in Snohomish County by Snohomish County Tomorrow via the Infrastructure Coordinating Committee. Representative Sullivan described the organizational structure of Snohomish County Tomorrow including the Assembly, the Steering Committee, the Executive Committee, the Community Advisory Board, Infrastructure Coordinating Committee, City Manager's Group, and Planning Advisory Committee. He explained Snohomish County Tomorrow's standing committees serve as the policy advisory body of the Snohomish County Tomorrow planning process. Committee action is by consensus but the operating procedures include a weighted voting process. He described a recent process whereby a weighted vote on Fully Contained Committees was avoided via development of a compromise. He reviewed Snohomish County Tomorrow's ongoing responsibilities: • Countywide planning policies • Determining UGA and MUGA boundaries • Orderly transition of unincorporated areas within UGAs. He advised Snohomish County Tomorrow recently adopted Annexation Principles which were then adopted by the Snohomish County Council and signed by the Snohomish County Executive and may be adopted into the countywide planning policies. • Population growth allocation • Buildable Lands Report • Growth monitoring reports • Fair share housing distribution Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 2, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 5 of 333 • Snohomish County arterial network project • Common siting process for essential public facilities. Councilmember Moore inquired about the citizen position on the Steering Committee. Representative Sullivan advised the Steering Committee had five ex-officio, non -voting positions. There was currently one vacant position for which they were soliciting applications. He advised applications were available on the website, snocotomorrow.org. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no members of the public present who wished to provide comment. CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF AL COMPAAN TO THE POSITION OF CHIEF OF POLICE. Mayor Haakenson stated he appointed Al Compaan Acting Police Chief on April 24, 2007 as they sat in the emergency room of Harborview Medical Center awaiting word on the condition of Chief David Stern. Since that day, he observed him as he lead the Police Department during a very difficult time with the assistance of Assistant Chief Gerry Gannon and Acting Assistant Chief Debbie Smith. Chief Compaan put the focus of the department on their job, law enforcement, as they quietly grieved the loss of Chief Stern. As he watched Chief Compaan, he observed the respect he was shown by the department and the community. Mayor Haakenson pointed out the number of people in the audience demonstrated the high regard the community had for Chief Compaan, noting those in attendance included former Mayors Hall and Fahey, past Councilmembers, former Police Chiefs, retired officers, past and current judges, current officers from other jurisdictions as well as Edmonds officers and many friends and family members. Mayor Haakenson emphasized Chief Compaan was the right man at the right time to serve as the City's next Police Chief. With the memory of David Stern and his wife Darlene Stern present in the audience in support of Chief Compaan, Mayor Haakenson offered his appointment of Al Compaan as the City's Chief of Police. COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO CONFIRM THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF AL COMPAAN TO THE POSITION OF CHIEF OF POLICE. Councilmember Dawson commented that everyone thought highly of Chief Compaan and she was proud and honored to have him serve the City in this position. Councilmember Marin thanked the audience members for attending, pointing out their presence indicated the support Chief Compaan had. He recalled talking with Mayor Haakenson a few months ago in support of promoting Al Compaan, noting the number of people in the audience demonstrated the community's broad support of his appointment. Councilmember Moore commented she had long admired Chief Compaan's professionalism, experience, and knowledge of the department. The City was lucky to have him, and his skills would serve the City for many years. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. SWEARING IN CEREMONY FOR CHIEF OF POLICE AL COMPAAN Superior Court Judge Richard Thorpe, longtime friend of Chief Compaan, swore him in as Chief of Police. In accordance with tradition, his wife pinned on his badge. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 2, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 6 of 333 Chief Compaan welcomed family and friends in the attendance tonight, commenting he was humbled and honored to accept this appointment. He expressed his appreciation for the remarkable support shown him by the Edmonds Police Department. He noted the sudden, unexpected passing of Chief Stern on April 25, 2007 and the events that followed were make -it -or -break -it events for the organization and although everyone had difficult days, they made it through. He was proud of the men and women of the Edmonds Police Department, the City's employees and the community, noting it was the team effort that made the period of transition a success. He recalled a lighthearted conversation with Seattle Police Chief Kerlikowske who commented any day was a good day when he did not see his name or the Seattle Police Department on the front page of the newspaper. He agreed that was generally true, however, the complementary articles in the local newspaper in recent days illustrated how the community stood with the Edmonds Police Department and he extended the Department's thanks to the community for their support. He recognized several people in the audience who were important to him personally and professionally including his wife Anne, his mother, his mother's husband, his brother, his father's wife, his brother-in- law and his aunt; Honorable Richard Thorpe, the City's former Municipal Court Judge and City prosecutor; retired Sergeant Art Wyatt, the Sergeant to whom he reported on his first day of work and from whom he inherited his Sergeant badge when he retired; Marlo Foster, the Chief who hired him; and Dan Prinz, the Chief who succeeded Chief Foster. Chief Compaan thanked everyone present for their support and well wishes and for sharing this time with him and fellow members of the Edmonds Police Department. He thanked the community for their trust, remarking he was honored to serve. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson had no report. COUNCIL COMMENTS The Council had no comments. RECEPTION IN HONOR OF CHIEF OF POLICE AL COMPAAN The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m., for a reception in honor of Chief of Police Al Compaan. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 2, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 7 of 333 AM-1205 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Debbie Karber Submitted For: Dan Clements Time: Consent Department: Administrative Services Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda infarmatinn Subject Title Approval of claim checks #99341 through #99548 for October 4, 2007 in the amount of $605,453.09 and #99549 through #99718 for October 11, 2007 in the amount of $822,627.15. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #45648 through #45694 for the period September 16 through September 30, 2007 in the amount of $788,184.36. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks and direct deposits and checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Fkeal Venr_ 2007 Revenue: Expenditure: $2,211,264.60 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $1,428,080.24 Payroll: $ 783,184.36 Link: Claim Cks 10-4-07 Link: Claim Cks 10-11-07 Fiscal Impact AttaehmPntc Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Dan Clements 10/11/2007 11:45 AM APRV Packet Page 8 of 333 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 01:49 PM APRV Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/11/2007 03:08 PM APRV Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 03:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Final Approval Date: 10/11/2007 Started On: 10/11/2007 11:13 AM Packet Page 9 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99341 10/1/2007 008550 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 11598 GYM RENTAL RENTAL OF LYNNWOOD HIGH SCI 001.000.640.575.520.450.00 197.98 Total : 197.98 99342 10/1/2007 008550 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 9740 ARTIST IN RESIDENCE GRANT ARTIST IN RESIDENCE GRANT FOI 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 500.00 Total : 500.00 99343 10/4/2007 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 246286 1-13992 PEST CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 57.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 5.12 Total : 62.62 99344 10/4/2007 070628 ACHESON, ALICE ACHESON1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "PUBLICITY FOR PENNIES" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 SELF -PUBLISHING PANEL 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 175.00 99345 10/4/2007 063819 ADKINS, LESLIE ADKINS1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "WRITERS GROUPS" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99346 10/4/2007 068335 ADOPT A STREAM FOUNDATION 2207 JEN MACHUGA STREAM & WETLAI JEN MACHUGA STREAM & WETLAI 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 85.00 Total : 85.00 99347 10/4/2007 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 07-376 JANITORIAL SERVICE Page: 1 Packet Page 10 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99347 10/4/2007 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES (Continued) JANITORIAL SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00 Total : 334.00 99348 10/4/2007 071916 ALEXANDER, CATHERINE ALEXANDER1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "CRAFTING THE SHORT STORY" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 145.00 99349 10/4/2007 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-87740 STREET - YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT STREET - YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1,002.00 Freight 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 160.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 103.42 Total : 1,265.42 99350 10/4/2007 071940 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING CORP 100107 ROBERTS RULE Robert's Rules of order CD -Rom 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 59.95 Freight 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 5.00 Total : 64.95 99351 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3971731 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.00 Total : 36.76 99352 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3959083 18386001 Page: 2 Packet Page 11 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99352 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK 99353 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 97.13 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.64 512-3964491 18386001 UNIFOTMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 97.13 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.64 Total : 211.54 512-3957655 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 21.84 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.94 512-3957657 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3962528 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 79.62 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 7.09 Page: 3 Packet Page 12 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99353 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3962530 STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STORM/STREET UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 512-3969648 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.34 Page: 4 Packet Page 13 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99353 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 512-3969649 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 512-3969650 STREET/STROM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STROM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STROM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 Page: 5 Packet Page 14 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99353 10/4/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) 512-3971732 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 63.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 5.69 Total : 247.70 99354 10/4/2007 068355 ARMADILLO TRUCK VAULT INC 64796 UNIT 411 EQ27PO - STORAGE LOC UNIT 411 EQ27PO - STORAGE LOC 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 845.00 Freight 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 40.00 Total : 885.00 99355 10/4/2007 071120 ASHLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 2500042565 113009/0702 POLYMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.51 1,937.50 Total : 1,937.50 99356 10/4/2007 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 563498 75179 DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,168.43 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 173.47 Total : 2,341.90 99357 10/4/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-1124 PARKS MAINT. BLDG PARKS MAINT. BLDG 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 34.67 425-771-4741 CEMETERY CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 67.75 Total : 102.42 99358 10/4/2007 064343 AT&T 425-771-0152 STATION #16 FAX Page: 6 Packet Page 15 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99358 10/4/2007 064343 AT&T (Continued) STATION #16 FAX 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 42.15 Total : 42.15 99359 10/4/2007 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 87196442X09062007 8719964442 PLANT CELL PHONES 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 4.50 Total : 4.50 99360 10/4/2007 065712 ATLAS SUPPLY SI+0086527 SUPPLIES Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.53 SIKAFLEX LIMESTONE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 28.44 Total : 30.97 99361 10/4/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 42208 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #600 printing 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 31.46 UB Outsourcing area #600 printing 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 31.46 UB Outsourcing area #600 printing 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 31.56 UB Outsourcing area #600 postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 98.96 UB Outsourcing area #600 postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 98.95 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.80 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.80 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.81 Total : 300.80 Page: 7 Packet Page 16 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99362 10/4/2007 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 9898191 Canon 5870 copier lease - 11/1 - Canon 5870 copier lease - 11/1 - 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35 Canon 5870 copier lease - 11/1 - 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.32 Canon 5870 copier lease - 11/1 - 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.33 Supply charge 11/1 - 11/30/07 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01 Supply charge 11/1 - 11/30/07 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 25.00 Supply charge 11/1 - 11/30/07 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 24.99 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.450.00 11.25 Total : 412.75 99363 10/4/2007 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 9758 DISPLAY AD AD FOR SURVEY FOR COMPREHE 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 316.00 Total : 316.00 99364 10/4/2007 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 359216 SHOP INVENTORY - BRAKE KITS SHOP INVENTORY - BRAKE KITS 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 272.24 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 24.23 Total : 296.47 99365 10/4/2007 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC 343536 FAC SEISMIC - 10 SETS OF PLANS Page: 8 Packet Page 17 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99365 10/4/2007 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC (Continued) FAC SEISMIC - 10 SETS OF PLANS 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 570.56 Sales Tax 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 49.07 343601 FAC SEISMIC - 10 PROJECT BOOK Sales Tax 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 30.63 FAC SEISMIC - 10 PROJECT BOOK 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 356.20 344787 FAC SEISMIC - 5 SETS OF PLANS FAC SEISMIC - 5 SETS OF PLANS 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 479.05 Sales Tax 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 41.20 Total : 1,526.71 99366 10/4/2007 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 211 Bitco Annual Maintenance Fee Bitco Annual Maintenance Fee 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 7,949.70 Total : 7,949.70 99367 10/4/2007 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 551282-02 INV# 551282-02 EDMONDS PD - MII LONG SLEEVE UNIFORM SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.95 SERVICE BARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.10 SEW BUTTONS ON SHIRT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.37 612498 INV#612498 EDMONDS PD - LEE BALLISTIC VEST - ABA XT3A2 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 649.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 57.85 Page: 9 Packet Page 18 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99367 10/4/2007 002500 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC (Continued) Total : 810.22 99368 10/4/2007 068434 BRAUN NORTHWEST INC 9171 UNIT 486 - SWITCHES UNIT 486 - SWITCHES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 44.52 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.43 Total : 47.95 99369 10/4/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 130598 C251 C-251 ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMEW 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 10,318.25 Total : 10,318.25 99370 10/4/2007 071434 BRUNETTE, SISSEL BRUNETTE8701 PRENATAL FITNESS CLASSES PRENATAL FITNESS #8701 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 98.00 Total : 98.00 99371 10/4/2007 003145 C & M TROPHY CO 50732 INV#50732 EDMONDS PD ENGRAVE NEW FLASHLIGHT 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 4.60 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 0.41 Total : 5.01 99372 10/4/2007 071917 CALL, WENDY CALL1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU ... WRITING 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99373 10/4/2007 071942 CAMPBELL, JULANN CAMPBELL8831 OIL PAINTING CLASSES OIL PAINTING CLASS #8631 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 431.20 OIL PAINTING CLASS #8632 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 431.20 Page: 10 Packet Page 19 of 333 vchlist 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 11 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99373 10/4/2007 071942 071942 CAMPBELL, JULANN (Continued) Total : 862.40 99374 10/4/2007 003255 CANINE COLLEGE CANINECOLLEGE8395 DOG OBEDIENCE CLASSES DOG OBEDIENCE #8395 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 240.00 Total : 240.00 99375 10/4/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 109954 WATER- FILL CARBON DIOX WATER- FILL CARBON DIOX 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 38.13 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.39 Total : 41.52 99376 10/4/2007 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 450701-008 OUTFALL CONSULTING OUTFALL CONSULTING 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 411.30 Total : 411.30 99377 10/4/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460727611 VOLUNTEERS UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460727612 OPS UNIFORMS Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.99 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 134.70 Page: 11 Packet Page 20 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99377 10/4/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION (Continued) 460728650 UNIFORMS Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.22 Stn. 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 92.40 Stn. 17 - Ops 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 92.40 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.22 460728674 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 Total : 533.41 99378 10/4/2007 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FINANCIAL 9577996 COPIER LEASE PW copier lease INSURANCE for PW 001.000.650.519.910.450.00 14.82 Total : 14.82 99379 10/4/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1841815 SUPPLIES PAPER TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 172.40 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.34 Total : 187.74 99380 10/4/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES w1830930-1 005302 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 2.49 GARBAGE LINERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 27.93 Total : 30.42 Page: 12 Packet Page 21 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99381 10/4/2007 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES 99382 10/4/2007 071918 COBURN, RANDY SUE Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount W1834853 FAC MAINT - KITCHEN ROLL WHIT FAC MAINT - KITCHEN ROLL WHIT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1,320.17 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 117.72 W 1834853-1 FAC MAINT - GLASS & SURFACE C FAC MAINT - GLASS & SURFACE C 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 92.74 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.25 W 1837055 FAC MAINT - VAC FILTERS, CADD) FAC MAINT - VAC FILTERS, CADD) 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 135.85 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.31 W1839776 FAC MAINT - KITCHEN TOWELS, G FAC MAINT - KITCHEN TOWELS, G 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 670.28 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 59.88 W 1840062 FAC MAINT - VERSAMATIC PAPER FAC MAINT - VERSAMATIC PAPER 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 548.41 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.03 Total : 3,024.64 COBURN1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ Page: 13 Packet Page 22 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99382 10/4/2007 071918 COBURN, RANDY SUE (Continued) "DIALOGUE* 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99383 10/4/2007 068077 CODES KNOWLEDGE COMPANY 480 Prof Sery Plan Review BLD20070884 Prof Sery Plan Review BLD20070884 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 620.50 Total : 620.50 99384 10/4/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0991 OPS UNIFORMS Batt Chiefs 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 70.63 510-0995 PREVENTION UNIFORMS Fire Marshal 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 29.44 510-1524 PREVENTION UNIFORMS Fire Inspector 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 17.67 510-1539 OPS UNIFORMS Admin BC 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 50.03 510-1884 ADMIN UNIFORMS Fire Chief 001.000.510.522.100.240.00 8.83 510-2341 OPS UNIFORMS Asst. Chief 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 44.14 Total : 220.74 99385 10/4/2007 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING AUG-SEPT 2007 AUG-SEPT 2007 EDMONDS PD DRY CLEANING/LAUNDRY 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 812.38 Total : 812.38 99386 10/4/2007 071919 COUSINEAU, JULIA COUSINEAU1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS Page: 14 Packet Page 23 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99386 10/4/2007 071919 COUSINEAU, JULIA (Continued) "HUMOR COLUMNS" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 "CHILDREN'S PLAYWRITING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 250.00 99387 10/4/2007 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM8793 IRISH DANCE CLASSES IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #8793 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 73.50 Total : 73.50 99388 10/4/2007 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 720703 INV#720703 CUST# 267 EDMONDS RADIO REPAIR/REPROGRAM 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 135.00 LITHIUM BATTERY FOR RADIO 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 11.25 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 12.59 Total : 158.84 99389 10/4/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201587752 FAC MAINT - LAMBSWOOL DUSTE FAC MAINT - LAMBSWOOL DUSTE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 105.10 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.83 Total : 113.93 99390 10/4/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Sept 2007 SEPT 2007 DRS Sept 2007 DRS 811.000.000.231.540.000.00 192,901.27 Total : 192,901.27 99391 10/4/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2791 MINUTE TAKING 9/18 & 9/25 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 243.60 Page: 15 Packet Page 24 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99391 10/4/2007 064531 064531 DINES, JEANNIE (Continued) Total : 243.60 99392 10/4/2007 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL Sept-07 Lobbyist General Government & Lobbyist General Government & 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 1,385.00 Lobbyist Edmonds Crossing 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 1,200.00 Total : 2,585.00 99393 10/4/2007 071920 DOYLE, MARGARET DOYLE1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ PANEL: SELF -PUBLISHING 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 99394 10/4/2007 069183 DUKES 4473 SEWER ROOT CONTROL SERVICE SEWER ROOT CONTROL SERVICE 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 22,956.84 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 2,043.16 Total : 25,000.00 99395 10/4/2007 007253 DUNN LUMBER 09235381 LIBRARY - BOOK DROP GATE REP LIBRARY - BOOK DROP GATE REP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.20 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.55 Total : 6.75 99396 10/4/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2969073 SEWER - MANHOLE LIDS ONLY SEWER - MANHOLE LIDS ONLY 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 534.00 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 45.39 Page: 16 Packet Page 25 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99396 10/4/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS (Continued) 2969317 STORM - 18X24 VANED GRATE LO STORM - 18X24 VANED GRATE LO 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 940.00 18X24 DROP HANDLE 2 SLOT CEN 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 498.00 18X24 DUCTILE IRON DROP HAND 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 906.00 18X24 DUCTILE IRON 2 SLOT CEN' 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 1,728.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 346.12 Total : 4,997.51 99397 10/4/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 86597 SUPPLIES MISC. FASTENERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.12 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.28 Total : 3.40 99398 10/4/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 86504 UNIT 68 SEWER - ARMOR ALL UNIT 68 SEWER - ARMOR ALL 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.99 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.71 Total : 8.70 99399 10/4/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 86548 OPS SUPPLIES stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 30.99 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.76 Total : 33.75 99400 10/4/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 11936 UPS/ BROWN & CALDWELL Page: 17 Packet Page 26 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99400 10/4/2007 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL (Continued) UPS/ BROWN & CALDWELL 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 15.51 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 1.38 11996 UPS/ANALYSIS PLUS UPS/ANALYSIS PLUS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 7.28 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.65 Total : 24.82 99401 10/4/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11 LIFT STATION #11 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 20.64 3-03575 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 179.82 3-07525 LIFT STATION #12 LIFT STATION #12 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 52.63 3-07709 LIFT STATION #15 LIFT STATION #15 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 20.64 3-09350 LIFT STATION #4 LIFT STATION #4 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 61.48 3-09800 LIFT STATION #10 LIFT STATION #10 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.72 3-29875 LIFT STATION #9 LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.72 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX -POLICE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX -POLICE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,019.67 Page: 18 Packet Page 27 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99401 10/4/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 6-02736 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX -FIRE LI PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX -FIRE LI 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 13.08 6-02737 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX -FIRE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX -FIRE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 166.35 6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 375.11 6-02825 LIBRARY & SPRINKLER LIBRARY & SPRINKLER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,695.63 6-02875 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (F ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (F 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 22.89 6-02925 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,161.99 6-04127 Fire Station #16 Fire Station #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 522.97 6-04128 fire sprinkler-FS #16 fire sprinkler-FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 13.08 Page: 19 Packet Page 28 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99401 10/4/2007 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 99402 99403 10/4/2007 071921 EGAN, TIMOTHY Invoice (Continued) 6-05155 1Si1awl. EGAN 1006 10/4/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 027924 PO # Description/Account Amount Public Works Bldg Public Works Bldg 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 121.32 Public Works Bldg 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 461.00 Public Works Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 461.00 Public Works Bldg 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 461.00 Public Works Bldg 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 461.00 Public Works Bldg 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 461.01 Public Works Fire Detector Public Works Fire Detector 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 1.63 Public Works Fire Detector 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 6.19 Total : 8,840.41 KEYNOTE SPEAKER - WRITE ON 1 KEYNOTE SPEECH @ EDMONDS l 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 ADMIN MAINT Page: 20 Packet Page 29 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99403 10/4/2007 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) Copier maint. 001.000.510.522.100.480.00 66.82 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.480.00 5.95 Total : 72.77 99404 10/4/2007 068261 ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTS INC 0014605-IN PW - FILTER CARTIDGES W/GASK PW - FILTER CARTIDGES W/GASK 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 228.80 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.10 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.90 Total : 255.80 99405 10/4/2007 069089 ENGEL, MARY POTTER ENGEL1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "FINDING & MASTERING VOICE" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 312.00 Total : 312.00 99406 10/4/2007 071922 ENGLISH, CRAIG ENGLISH1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "DO A FANTASTIC READING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 "DR. FRANKENSTEINS'S CHARACT 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 200.00 99407 10/4/2007 065673 ERICKSON, CHUCK 20070002 Design/Print Historic Presv Brochure Design/Print Historic Presv Brochure 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 1,770.00 Total : 1,770.00 99408 10/4/2007 071634 ESCHELON TELCOM INC 010495174 C/A 010495174 PR1-2 City Phone Service Thru 9/25/ 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 869.25 Page: 21 Packet Page 30 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99408 10/4/2007 071634 071634 ESCHELON TELCOM INC (Continued) Total : 869.25 99409 10/4/2007 070033 EVERGREEN PRINT SOLUTIONS 32151 ALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ALS incident reports -printing 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 644.84 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 57.39 Total : 702.23 99410 10/4/2007 071885 EVERGREEN TREE CARE INC Bus Lic Ref OVERPMT OF BUSINESS LIC Refund Overpmt of Business Lic 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 2.00 Total : 2.00 99411 10/4/2007 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 09302007 PUBLIC DEFENDER PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 9,640.00 Total : 9,640.00 99412 10/4/2007 066591 FISHER, DEBORAH FISHER1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ NON-FICTION JUDGE 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00 "WORKING WITHOUT A NET - FRE 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 225.00 99413 10/4/2007 010660 FOSTER, MARLO 80 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 335.33 Total : 335.33 99414 10/4/2007 071923 FOUNTAS, ANGELA FOUNTAS WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "FLASH FICTION/FICTION IN A FLA 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 384.00 Total : 384.00 99415 10/4/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 4975 STREET - CONCRETE MIX Page: 22 Packet Page 31 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99415 10/4/2007 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST (Continued) STREET - CONCRETE MIX 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 162.56 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 14.47 Total : 177.03 99416 10/4/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9454599912 PW - INDUCED DRAFT BLOWER PW - INDUCED DRAFT BLOWER 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 250.65 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.56 95454599920 FAC MAINT - GREASELESS LUBE F FAC MAINT - GREASELESS LUBE F 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.36 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.41 Total : 289.98 99417 10/4/2007 071924 GROVER, MAX GROVER1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ VISUAL ARTIST PRESENTATION 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00 Total : 100.00 99418 10/4/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5273166 112830-000 CONTROLLER/DIGITAL SENSOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 1,890.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 39.80 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 169.82 Total : 2,099.62 99419 10/4/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 74365 UNIT 97 - BEZEL Page: 23 Packet Page 32 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99419 10/4/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC (Continued) UNIT 97 - BEZEL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.26 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.18 74408 UNIT 38 - STRIKER UNIT 38 - STRIKER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.56 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.94 74499 UNIT 717 - REAR AXEL OIL UNIT 717 - REAR AXEL OIL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.69 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.60 74906 UNIT 237 - SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY UNIT 237 - SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.38 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.33 74956 UNIT 237 - SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY UNIT 237 - SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.38 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.33 75229 UNIT EQ26FI - CAP ASSEMBLY, PA UNIT EQ26FI - CAP ASSEMBLY, PA 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 52.39 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.66 75275 UNIT 872 - PATS KEY UNIT 872 - PATS KEY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.84 Page: 24 Packet Page 33 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99419 10/4/2007 012900 HARRIS FORD INC (Continued) 77361 UNIT 93 - CONTROL UNIT 93 - CONTROL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.34 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.19 77950 UNIT 485 - ALTERNATOR AND COF UNIT 485 - ALTERNATOR AND COF 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 350.28 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.17 78050 UNIT 485 - END ASSEMBLY,SUPPL UNIT 485 - END ASSEMBLY,SUPPL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 36.56 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.25 CM77950 UNIT 485 - RETURNED CORE FEE UNIT 485 - RETURNED CORE FEE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -75.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -6.68 CM78050 UNIT 485 - RETURNED END ASSEN G UNIT 485 - RETURNED END ASSEN 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -34.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -3.08 Total : 571.93 99420 10/4/2007 071417 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 5485911 WATER - SURVEY F/ LEAK DETEC' WATER - SURVEY F/ LEAK DETEC' 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5,496.00 Total : 5,496.00 99421 10/4/2007 071925 HERRICK, SCOTT HERRICK1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS Page: 25 Packet Page 34 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99421 10/4/2007 071925 HERRICK, SCOTT (Continued) "TECHNOLOGY FOR WRITERS" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 SELF -PUBLISHING PANEL 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 175.00 99422 10/4/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1095723 6035 3225 0267 0205 STAKES, PLANT TIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.76 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.96 3031332 6035322502670205 GASSER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.85 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.55 3097673 6035322502670205 BUNGICORDS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.94 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.06 3588038 6035322502670205 BOLTS, SCREWS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 43.52 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.87 4074889 6035322502670205 PRUNERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 51.83 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.61 Page: 26 Packet Page 35 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99422 10/4/2007 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 5562232 6035322502670205 ROSES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.76 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.94 5575817 6035322502670205 TRASH BAGS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.96 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.67 7561970 6035322502670205 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.65 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.93 8037923 6035322502670205 SPRAYER,GASSSER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 58.79 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.23 Total : 315.88 99423 10/4/2007 071926 HOWE, ANDREA HOWE1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "WORKING WITH A PROFESSIONP 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99424 10/4/2007 067265 IAPMO 2007 RENEWAL DW&BP MAGAZINE - ONE YR SUB! DW&BP MAGAZINE - ONE YR SUB: 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 42.00 Total : 42.00 99425 10/4/2007 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP S/P 3419367 C/A S114983 09/2007 Web Server Hosting for Intei 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 69.90 Page: 27 Packet Page 36 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99425 10/4/2007 070864 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP (Continued) Total : 69.90 99426 10/4/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 74383342 COPIER LEASE COPIER LEASE- 001.000.640.574.100.450.00 806.15 74423053 COPIER LEASE PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEA 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 25.98 Total : 832.13 99427 10/4/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 74423050 C/A 467070-1003748A4 FINANCE Finance Copier Rental 9/22-10/21/07 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07 Meter Charge 8/3-9/3/07 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 79.86 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 47.53 Total : 581.46 99428 10/4/2007 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 74423033 Lease/copies DSD Reception Lease/copies DSD Reception 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 113.05 74423040 Lease/copies DSD Large Copier Lease/copies DSD Large Copier 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,060.84 74423048 Lease/copies Eng Lease/copies Eng 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 726.95 Total : 1,900.84 99429 10/4/2007 014900 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF 2513 MEMBERSHIP Annual Membership Fee- 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 225.00 Total : 225.00 99430 10/4/2007 069098 ISRAEL, UNDERSTANDING ISRAEL0929 STORY TELLING Page: 28 Packet Page 37 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99430 10/4/2007 069098 ISRAEL, UNDERSTANDING (Continued) STORY TELLING @ WATERSHED F 001.000.640.574.350.410.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 99431 10/4/2007 015270 JONES CHEMICALS INC 365475 54278825 HYPOCHLORITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,000.69 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 264.06 Total : 3,264.75 99432 10/4/2007 071939 JONES, CATHERINE ANN JONES1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "THE WAY OF STORY" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 "INVITING THE MUSE" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 325.00 Total : 470.00 99433 10/4/2007 070145 JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS 37136 Edmonds Hist Brochure #1 Printing Edmonds Hist Brochure #1 Printing 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 1,230.00 Total : 1,230.00 99434 10/4/2007 071927 JUVIK, TOM JUVIK1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "WRITING & MARKETING SHORT L 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 145.00 99435 10/4/2007 068024 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN FOUf KRUCKEBERG8727 BOTANIC GARDEN TOUR BOTANIC GARDEN TOUR #8727 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 90.00 Total : 90.00 99436 10/4/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1010239664 STREET - "SIGN AREA UNDER 24 1- Page: 29 Packet Page 38 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99436 10/4/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY (Continued) STREET - "SIGN AREA UNDER 24 F 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 218.40 Freight 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 11.86 Total : 230.26 99437 10/4/2007 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1010237472 OPS UNIFORMS Drivers gloves 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 158.40 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.86 1010237473 OPS UNIFORMS drivers gloves 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 39.60 Total : 209.86 99438 10/4/2007 065680 LIFE ASSIST 452159 ALS EXPENDABLE TOOLS blood pressure unit & conterra kit 001.000.510.526.100.359.00 1,234.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.359.00 109.87 Total : 1,344.37 99439 10/4/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 095771 PW LETTER HEAD (1000) PW LETTER HEAD (1000) 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 126.00 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 11.21 Total : 137.21 99440 10/4/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 582660 SUPPLIES BLADES, SPOOLS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 79.68 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.09 Page: 30 Packet Page 39 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99440 10/4/2007 018980 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA (Continued) Total : 86.77 99441 10/4/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 574349 STREET - STRAP FOR BACKPACK STREET - STRAP FOR BACKPACK 111.000.653.542.710.480.00 16.66 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.710.480.00 1.48 Total : 18.14 99442 10/4/2007 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 09070639 UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES - BELT SANDEF UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES - BELT SANDEF 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.20 Total : 14.70 99443 10/4/2007 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 3238 INTERPRETER FEES INTERPRETER FEES 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 90.00 3240 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 60.00 3241 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 45.00 3249 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 135.00 3251 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 45.00 3253 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 45.00 Total : 420.00 99444 10/4/2007 019594 MARTIN, JAMES W 82 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement Page: 31 Packet Page 40 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99444 10/4/2007 019594 MARTIN, JAMES W (Continued) LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 836.69 Total : 836.69 99445 10/4/2007 065829 MARTINSON, LINDA MARTINSON8596 BELLY DANCE CLASSES BELLY DANCE TRIM & TONE- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 130.20 Total : 130.20 99446 10/4/2007 071928 MCHUGH, JOE MCHUGH1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "THE TELLING TAKES US HOME" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 145.00 99447 10/4/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 72598075 1034052-01 STEEL COUPLING/RING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 130.87 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.87 Total : 136.74 99448 10/4/2007 071487 MED-TECH RESOURCE INC 30564 INV# 30564 EDMONDS PD 2-PACK OF 3 VOLT LITHIUM BATTE 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 42.72 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 10.10 Total : 52.82 99449 10/4/2007 070716 MEDQUIST INC 75013465 Maintenance Contract for Council Maintenance Contract for Council 001.000.110.511.100.480.00 106.72 Total : 106.72 99450 10/4/2007 068309 MERCURY FITNESS REPAIR INC 7071715 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Page: 32 Packet Page 41 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99450 10/4/2007 068309 MERCURY FITNESS REPAIR INC (Continued) REPAIR SERVICE CHARGE - SUPP 001.000.640.575.520.480.00 127.70 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.480.00 11.37 Total : 139.07 99451 10/4/2007 069592 METROCALL Q02988971 INV# Q02988971 EDMONDS PD PAGER SERVICE 9/27-10/26/07 001.000.410.521.100.420.00 79.97 Total : 79.97 99452 10/4/2007 020450 MICRO DATA 40420-75 INV# 40420-75 CUST#6932 - EDMO 5,300 INFRACTION FORMS 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 954.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 43.28 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 83.77 Total : 1,081.05 99453 10/4/2007 063773 MICROFLEX 00017299 Tax Audit Program thru 8/31/07 Tax Audit Program thru 8/31/07 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 245.10 Total : 245.10 99454 10/4/2007 071935 MILLEN, PAMELA MILLEN0925 REFUND CLASS REFUND DUE TO MEDICAL 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 37.00 Total : 37.00 99455 10/4/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 55320 131 HOSE 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 39.12 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 3.48 Page: 33 Packet Page 42 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99455 10/4/2007 020900 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC (Continued) Total : 42.60 99456 10/4/2007 071929 MORRELL, JESSICA MORRELL1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "PROPOSALS THAT SIZZLE" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 "THE ANTI-HERO" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 225.00 Total : 370.00 99457 10/4/2007 024001 NC MACHINERY CO SECS0449315 UNIT 57 - PINS, WASHERS, RINGS UNIT 57 - PINS, WASHERS, RINGS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 290.70 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.37 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.69 SECS0449577 UNIT 57 - RETAINER ASSEMBLY UNIT 57 - RETAINER ASSEMBLY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.55 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.19 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.27 Total : 378.77 99458 10/4/2007 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0348232-IN FILTER INVENTORY FILTER INVENTORY 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 173.76 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 14.94 Total : 188.70 99459 10/4/2007 070788 NETRIVER INC 37788 HOSTING PACKAGE NON PROFIT HOSITNG PACKAGE- 001.000.240.513.110.410.00 39.00 Total : 39.00 Page: 34 Packet Page 43 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99460 10/4/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 323912314-070 C/A 323912314 IT Cell Phone Service 8/25-9/24/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 141.92 Total : 141.92 99461 10/4/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 411191318-070 Nextel Chrgs. Bldg Div 8/25 to 9/24/0 Nextel Chrgs. Bldg Div 8/25 to 9/24/0 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 88.04 Total : 88.04 99462 10/4/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 976032312-070 COMMUNICATIONS Admin 001.000.510.522.100.420.00 29.52 Operations 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 359.33 Prevention 001.000.510.522.300.420.00 80.59 ALS 001.000.510.526.100.420.00 53.27 Total : 522.71 99463 10/4/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0082876 SODIUM BISULFITE SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 612.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 54.47 Total : 666.47 99464 10/4/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 502 Verbatim Transcript R-07-53-9/12/07 Verbatim Transcript R-07-53-9/12/07 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 195.00 Total : 195.00 99465 10/4/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 901290 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 134.56 Page: 35 Packet Page 44 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 99465 10/4/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) 99466 10/4/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 405942 151i[:1;cLEI 516249 541789 Description/Account Amount Total : 134.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL INK CARTRIDGES 001.000.640.575.510.310.00 24.76 GLUE STICKS, COVER STOCK, ETA 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 57.14 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.510.310.00 2.20 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 5.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES PENS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.40 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES LAMINATING POUCHES, TISSUE, E 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 74.26 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 6.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES CATALOG ENVELOPES 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 33.27 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES POSTER BOARD 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 27.07 NAME LABELS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 28.59 Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 2.41 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.54 Page: 36 Packet Page 45 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99466 10/4/2007 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC (Continued) Total : 278.99 99467 10/4/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 834201 520437 COPIER PAPER/POST ITS/TAPE/LI1 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 59.21 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 5.27 Total : 64.48 99468 10/4/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 035246 WATER QUALITY - INK CARTRIDGI WATER QUALITY - INK CARTRIDGI 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 83.07 STREET - SIGN SHOP SUPPLIES - 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 9.79 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.40 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 0.87 992395 STREET - SIGN SHOP SUPPLIES - STREET - SIGN SHOP SUPPLIES- 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 52.60 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 4.68 Total : 158.41 99469 10/4/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 054086 Office Supplies DSD Office Supplies DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 424.89 Total : 424.89 99470 10/4/2007 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 661255 Legal Services Legislative OMW 8/2C Legal Services Legislative OMW 8/2C 001.000.110.511.100.410.00 5,727.50 Total : 5,727.50 99471 10/4/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00046974 UNIT 24 - PIN WELDMENT, ROLL P Page: 37 Packet Page 46 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99471 10/4/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY (Continued) UNIT 24 - PIN WELDMENT, ROLL P 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 28.52 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 62.78 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.13 Total : 99.43 99472 10/4/2007 063588 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS CO 6229331-00 OPS SUPPLIES 5 gal transynd packs, etc. 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 596.38 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 53.08 Total : 649.46 99473 10/4/2007 071930 PAI, SHIN YU PAI1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "WRITING INSPIRTED BY VISUAL 1 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 225.00 Total : 225.00 99474 10/4/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9898187 ADMIN LEASE copier lease 001.000.510.522.100.450.00 137.06 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.450.00 12.20 Total : 149.26 99475 10/4/2007 067175 PATNEAUDE, DAVID PATNEAUDE1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "MYSTERY WRITING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99476 10/4/2007 027279 PATRICK & CO 745960 INV#745960 ACCT#26925 EDMOND Page: 38 Packet Page 47 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99476 10/4/2007 027279 PATRICK & CO (Continued) JUVENILE PET LICENSES - 200 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 121.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 5.96 745990 INV#745990 ACCT#26925 EDMOND 2500 DOG & PET LICENSE TAGS 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 465.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 17.59 Total : 609.55 99477 10/4/2007 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK8642 PILATES CLASSES PILATES #8642 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 406.00 PILATES #8643 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 585.20 Total : 991.20 99478 10/4/2007 069825 PENTON TECHNOLOGY MEDIA INC 03900108 Windows IT Pro Subscription -Waters Windows IT Pro Subscription -Waters 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 99.95 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 8.80 Total : 108.75 99479 10/4/2007 069633 PET PROS EPD-003 INV#EPD-003 JOSH MCCLURE PRECISE PLUS K-9 33 POUND 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 518.28 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 44.05 Total : 562.33 99480 10/4/2007 071936 PETERS, JAYNI PETERS0928 REFUND REFUND DUE TO INSUFFICIENT RI 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 35.00 Page: 39 Packet Page 48 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99480 10/4/2007 071936 071936 PETERS, JAYNI 99481 10/4/2007 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 35.00 157943 WATER/SEWER - L&I SAFETY TAP WATER/SEWER - L&I SAFETY TAP 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 4.13 WATER/SEWER - L&I SAFETY TAP 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 4.13 158179 WATER/SEWER - L&I TAPE MAILIN WATER/SEWER - L&I TAPE MAILIN 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.55 WATER/SEWER - L&I TAPE MAILIN 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.54 158384 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.17 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.16 158593 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.55 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.54 158803 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.59 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.58 159032 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 4.17 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 4.17 Page: 40 Packet Page 49 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99481 10/4/2007 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR (Continued) 159206 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.68 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.68 159270 STORM - SAFETY TY LINE RETURP STORM - SAFETY TY LINE RETURP 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 11.07 159280 FAC SEISMIC PROJECT MAILING 1 FAC SEISMIC PROJECT MAILING 7 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 130.91 159284 PW POSTAGE PW POSTAGE 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 0.50 159298 FLEET - SIRENNET POSTAGE FLEET - SIRENNET POSTAGE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 8.57 159361 FAC SEISMIC PROJECT MAILING- FAC SEISMIC PROJECT MAILING- 116.000.651.594.190.650.00 24.34 159442 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.68 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.68 159626 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.59 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.58 159878 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 5.68 WATER/SEWER L&I SAFETY TAPE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 5.68 Page: 41 Packet Page 50 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99481 10/4/2007 071811 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR (Continued) Total : 280.92 99482 10/4/2007 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 159814 INV#159814 CUST#2772 EDMONDE MAIL RADIO TO MOTOROLA 001.000.410.521.100.420.00 21.78 Total : 21.78 99483 10/4/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 003603 UNIT EQBFI738 - OIL UNIT EQBFI738 - OIL 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.58 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.10 Total : 25.68 99484 10/4/2007 066139 PREMIUM MARKETING 921072 INV#921072 EDMONDS PD FLAT WALL MOUNT - TRAINING R( 001.000.410.521.400.350.00 85.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.400.350.00 8.58 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.350.00 8.42 Total : 102.00 99485 10/4/2007 071184 PROCOM 2007-1196 PROF SERV FIBER OPTIC PROJ Prof Sery Fiber Optic Proj for Sept 07 001.000.390.528.200.410.00 3,156.25 Total : 3,156.25 99486 10/4/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 MCC 24 hour alarm monitoring MCC- 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 96.00 Total : 96.00 99487 10/4/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANI 0019522-IN EDMCITW Page: 42 Packet Page 51 of 333 vchlist 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 43 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99487 10/4/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANI (Continued) EYE WASH STATION 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 167.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 14.03 0019611-IN EDMCITW EYE WASH PRESERVATIVE 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 55.80 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 4.69 Total : 241.52 99488 10/4/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 944.07 Total : 944.07 99489 10/4/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 204.09 0230757007 PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 74.66 1916766007 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 56.33 2753166004 PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & CC PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & CC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 330.89 Page: 43 Packet Page 52 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99489 10/4/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 2776365005 Public Works Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 4.82 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 18.31 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 18.31 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 18.31 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 18.31 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 18.30 2986629000 LIFT STATION #13 LIFT STATION #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 82.45 5254926008 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 86.71 5322323139 Fire Station # 16 Fire Station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 202.41 5672895009 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 23.95 5903085008 FLEET Fleet 7110 210th St SW 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 76.24 6439566008 PUBLIC SAFETY -FIRE STATION PUBLIC SAFETY -FIRE STATION 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 204.09 6490327001 ANDERSON CENTER ANDERSON CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 715.09 Page: 44 Packet Page 53 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99489 10/4/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 8851908007 LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.79 9919661109 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 62.66 Total : 2,270.72 99490 10/4/2007 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 FLOW METERING STATIONS FLOW METERING STATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.82 Total : 137.82 99491 10/4/2007 063452 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 285792 UNIT 490 - TERM STRIPS UNIT 490 - TERM STRIPS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.58 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.41 Total : 4.99 99492 10/4/2007 071944 REED PUBLISHING M741180 DIRECTORY LISTING DIRECTORY LISTING 001.000.640.574.100.440.00 379.95 Freight 001.000.640.574.100.440.00 14.50 Total : 394.45 99493 10/4/2007 066977 RHOMAR INDUSTRIES INC 059506 STREET - BIG MOUTH APPLICATO STREET - BIG MOUTH APPLICATO 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 329.52 Freight 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 27.96 Total : 357.48 99494 10/4/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9413099036 WATER/SEWER - COLD MIX ASPH, Page: 45 Packet Page 54 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 46 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99494 10/4/2007 068484 RINKER MATERIALS (Continued) WATER/SEWER - COLD MIX ASPH, 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 49.73 WATER/SEWER - COLD MIX ASPH, 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 49.72 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.43 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.42 9413099038 WATER/SEWER - COLD MIX ASPH, WATER/SEWER - COLD MIX ASPH, 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 183.30 WATER/SEWER - COLD MIX ASPH, 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 183.30 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.77 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.76 Total : 506.43 99495 10/4/2007 071945 ROSE, SUE GILL ROSE8639 WATERCOLOR CLASS INTRODUCTION TO WATERCOLOF 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 246.40 Total : 246.40 99496 10/4/2007 067439 SANELLI, MARY LOU SANELL11007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ POETRYJUDGE 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00 "DO A FANTASTIC READING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 "WRITING WITHOUT A CENSOR" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 320.00 99497 10/4/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY SAWDON0929 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR Page: 46 Packet Page 55 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 47 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99497 10/4/2007 071007 SAWDON, MANDY (Continued) PLAZA ROOM AND ANDERSON CE 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 120.00 Total : 120.00 99498 10/4/2007 071943 SEATTLE SISTER CITIES ASSOC 10032007 CONFERENCE FEES REGISTRATION FOR JIM CORBET- 623.200.210.557.210.490.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 99499 10/4/2007 071931 SENSEL, JONI SENSEL1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "ONE ON ONE MANUSCRIPT CRITI 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 150.00 "THE ART OF THE ENDING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 275.00 99500 10/4/2007 071341 SHORTRIDGE, JENNIE SHORTRIDGE1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS FICTION JUDGE 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00 "HOW AND WHEN TO WRITE A SE. 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 225.00 99501 10/4/2007 071941 SHRADER, BECKY SHRADER8850 PERSONAL TRAINING PERSONAL TRAINING #8850 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 32.50 Total : 32.50 99502 10/4/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0067738-IN UNIT 98 - RESPONDER LP SER MIP Page: 47 Packet Page 56 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 48 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99502 10/4/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM (Continued) UNIT 98 - RESPONDER LP SER MIP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 299.00 UNIT 25 - RESPONDER LP SER MI 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 598.00 UNIT 57 - RESPONDER LP SER MI 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 299.00 UNIT 95 - RESPONDER LP SER MIP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 299.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.00 Total : 1,537.00 99503 10/4/2007 036955 SKY NURSERY 261477 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION FLOWER, PLANTS FOR CITY WIDE 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 223.39 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 19.88 262222 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION PLANTS & FLOWERS FOR CITY WI 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 170.15 Sales Tax 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 15.14 Total : 428.56 99504 10/4/2007 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 238726122 SPORTS CAMPS SKYHAWKS SPORTS CAMPS:- 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 2,664.00 Total : 2,664.00 99505 10/4/2007 071937 SLIWA, NANCY SLIWA0924 REFUND REFUND OF PLAZA ROOM DAMAG 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00 Total : 500.00 99506 10/4/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3850013073 IRRIGATION CONTROL Page: 48 Packet Page 57 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 49 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99506 10/4/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) IRRIGATION CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.74 3890014181 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 58.20 4120014156 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 16.17 5040011628 UTILITY BILLING 750 15TH ST SW 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 342.67 Total : 446.78 99507 10/4/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 483015518 958-001-000-8 WWTP POWER 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 20,356.11 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1,221.37 Total : 21, 577.48 99508 10/4/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2070015082 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 145.26 2260043795 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 45.79 2330012283 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.74 2440024129 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 81.83 2480017397 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 274.95 Page: 49 Packet Page 58 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 50 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99508 10/4/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 2540012560 LIFT STATION #4 LIFT STATION #4 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 324.53 2670022181 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,797.47 2790022228 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 47.88 3710011507 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 47.24 3720012057 LIBRARY LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,138.25 3800017489 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 45.72 3850011440 LIFT STATION #12 LIFT STATION #12 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 315.20 4070022027 LIFT STATION #15 LIFT STATION #15 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 30.72 4130026596 LIFT STATION #11 LIFT STATION #11 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 31.55 4210013902 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 49.79 4320012174 STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 339.52 Page: 50 Packet Page 59 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 51 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99508 10/4/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 4330014129 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 122.58 4840011953 Public Works Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 72.67 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 276.15 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 276.15 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 276.15 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 276.15 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 276.14 5360023807 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 16.17 5390028164 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 4,815.51 5410010689 CITY HALL CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,325.04 5500019350 LOG CABIN LOG CABIN 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 78.06 Total : 15,556.21 99509 10/4/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 36226 FLEET - LINE STAMP Page: 51 Packet Page 60 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 52 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99509 10/4/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP (Continued) FLEET - LINE STAMP 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.91 Total : 23.41 99510 10/4/2007 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC Oct-07 10/07 RECREATION SERVIES CON 10/07 Recreation Servies Contract FE 001.000.390.519.900.410.00 4,791.67 Total : 4,791.67 99511 10/4/2007 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4117334-01 STREET/STORM SAFETY VESTS STREET/STORM SAFETY VESTS 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 346.50 STREET/STORM SAFETY VESTS 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 346.50 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 30.84 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 30.84 Total : 754.68 99512 10/4/2007 071932 STEIN, GARTH STEIN1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "WHO'S ZOOMING WHOM?" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 145.00 99513 10/4/2007 071575 STEROCYCLE INC 0004150435 INV#0004150435 CUST# 6076358 E 2 MEDIUM BOX DISPOSAL BIO WA 001.000.410.521.910.410.00 94.02 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.410.00 3.35 Total : 97.37 Page: 52 Packet Page 61 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 53 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99514 10/4/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1176333 FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.07 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.85 1181869 CITY HALL - ELECT SUPPLIES CITY HALL - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 128.14 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.40 Total : 174.46 99515 10/4/2007 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 34952 OPS PROF SERVICES consultation 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 47.00 Total : 47.00 99516 10/4/2007 071938 SZABO, KELLY SZABO0924 REFUND CLASS REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 98.00 Total : 98.00 99517 10/4/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10585908 SUPPLIES GALVANIZING COMPOUND 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 77.22 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.42 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.44 Total : 91.08 99518 10/4/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10586487 SHOP - TIE WRAP, EARPLUGS, ST SHOP - TIE WRAP, EARPLUGS, ST 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 134.51 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.97 Page: 53 Packet Page 62 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 54 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99518 10/4/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC (Continued) 18803918 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.47 Total : 176.70 99519 10/4/2007 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 41134 FLEET - 5 TEE SHIRTS AND SCREE FLEET - 5 TEE SHIRTS AND SCREE 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 70.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.23 Total : 76.23 99520 10/4/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1539525 NEWSPAPER AD Ordinance 3664 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 21.60 1540300 NEWSPAPER AD Ordinance 3663 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 25.92 Total : 47.52 99521 10/4/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1535048 Legal Advertising CU-05-128 Holt Legal Advertising CU-05-128 Holt 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 18.00 1536296 Legal Advertising — Legal Advertising- 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 33.84 1538604 Legal Advertising ADB-07-67 (Gregg; Legal Advertising ADB-07-67 (Gregg, 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 24.48 Total : 76.32 99522 10/4/2007 067393 THE GROUP 92007 JW 2007 CROSS CONNECTION CONTF Page: 54 Packet Page 63 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 55 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99522 10/4/2007 067393 THE GROUP (Continued) 2007 CROSS CONNECTION CONTF 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 95.00 92007LM 2007 CROSS CONNECTION CONTF 2007 CROSS CONNECTION CONTF 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 95.00 Total : 190.00 99523 10/4/2007 069357 THIES, MIKE Thies, Mike Reimberse for Digital Camera Code Reimberse for Digital Camera Code 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 250.32 Total : 250.32 99524 10/4/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 856329 MUSEUM monthly elevator maint-museum 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 162.05 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.42 856330 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENA� CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENAI` 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 775.91 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 69.05 856331 MONITORING -PS monitoring-PS- 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 35.15 867808 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAIN SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAIN 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 104.00 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 9.26 Total : 1,169.84 99525 10/4/2007 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES Acct # 161 MEBT services through September 21 MEBT services through September 21 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 133.73 Page: 55 Packet Page 64 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 56 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 99525 10/4/2007 068249 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATE (Continued) 99526 10/4/2007 070037 TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION INC E1DB Final Pmt 99527 99528 10/4/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7595793 7595922 10/4/2007 070767 UNITED RENTAL NORTHWEST INC 68450888-001 Description/Account Amount Total : 133.73 E1DB.164th Walkway/Final Payment E1DB.164th Walkway/Final Payment 125.100.620.595.300.650.00 108,174.65 E1 DB.Final Pmt Retainage 125.100.000.223.400.000.00 -5,408.73 Total : 102,765.92 WATER TOOLS - 3/4" CARB HOLE WATER TOOLS - 3/4" CARB HOLE 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 977.00 1" RO CARB HOLESAW 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1,101.30 1/4" ARBOR PILOT BIT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 135.10 INVENTORY - W-SADLCI-06-010- 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 207.12 W-SADLCI-12-040 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 138.52 W -CLM PC I-06-027 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 275.66 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 188.14 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 52.81 WATER INVENTORY - W-RESET-0 WATER INVENTORY - W-RESET-0 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,579.60 Freight 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 44.20 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 138.03 Total : 4,837.48 WATER/ SEWER - 1.5' - 46" SINGLE Page: 56 Packet Page 65 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 57 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 99528 10/4/2007 070767 UNITED RENTAL NORTHWEST INC (Continued) 99529 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-1176 PO # Description/Account Amount WATER/ SEWER - 1.5' - 46" SINGLE 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 660.00 WATER/ SEWER - 1.5' - 46" SINGLE 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 660.00 1.5' - 88" SINGLE SHORE 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 840.00 1.5' - 88" SINGLE SHORE 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 840.00 FIN FORM SHEETS 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 255.00 FIN FORM SHEETS 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 255.00 BUCKET PUMP 7 GAL POLY 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 375.00 BUCKET PUMP 7 GAL POLY 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 375.00 48" RELEASE TOOL 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 27.50 48" RELEASE TOOL 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 27.50 48" REMOVAL HOOK 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 20.00 48" REMOVAL HOOK 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 20.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 193.80 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.350.00 193.80 Total : 4,742.60 CITY PARK T1 LINE City Park T1 Line 9/16-10/16/07 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 407.57 Page: 57 Packet Page 66 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 58 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99529 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) 425-DHO-0667 DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOC Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 350.92 425-NW2-0887 Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00 Total : 1,038.49 99530 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0423 03 0260 1032797592 07 AFTER HOURS PHONE 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 55.74 Total : 55.74 99531 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.03 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 269.35 425-206-1137 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 26.50 425-206-1141 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.43 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.22 425-206-4810 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.17 TELEMETRY LIFT STATION 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.32 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM LIBRARY SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88 Page: 58 Packet Page 67 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 59 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99531 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 425-206-8379 MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88 425-672-7132 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 53.62 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY STATIONS TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.89 TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.89 425-712-8251 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 13.82 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 69.09 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 56.65 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 56.65 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SF 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 80.15 425-712-8347 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 59.15 425-775-1534 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 160.63 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 298.32 425-775-2455 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 49.37 Page: 59 Packet Page 68 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 60 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99531 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) 425-775-7865 Radio Line between Public Works & l Radio Line between Public Works & I 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 52.25 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 118.96 425-778-3297 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.51 VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON S' 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.37 425-RTO-9133 PUBLIC WORKS CPNNECTION TO Public Works Connection to 911 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48 Public Works Connection to 911 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78 Total : 1,932.60 99532 10/4/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-778-2153 FS #20 PHONE SERVICE FS #20 PHONE SERVICE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 48.96 425-FLO-0017 FS #16 FRAME RELAY FS #16 FRAME RELAY 001.000.510.528.600.420.00 354.94 425-NW4-3726 FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOI FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOi 001.000.510.528.600.420.00 247.00 Page: 60 Packet Page 69 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 61 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99532 10/4/2007 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) Total : 650.90 99533 10/4/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0587374046 965420720 CELL PRETREATMENT 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 36.29 Total : 36.29 99534 10/4/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 371017793-00001 FAC MAINT - G EVANS SET UP AN[ FAC MAINT - G EVANS SET UP AN[ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 24.00 470091643-00001 425-238-8846 cell phone -Tod Moles 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 47.00 470103273-00001 425-238-5456 cell phone -Mike Johnson 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 34.28 670091643-00001 425-327-5379 cell phone -unit #77 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 29.32 769986915-01 425-231-2668 cell phone -water lead 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 63.41 770096328-00001 425-238-8252 cell phone -Dave Sittauer 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 3.82 Total : 201.83 99535 10/4/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0588600746 Cell Charges Graf 8/19 to 9/18/2007 Cell Charges Graf 8/19 to 9/18/2007 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 60.03 Total : 60.03 99536 10/4/2007 064858 VISITORS GUIDE PUBLICATIONS 07-158 ARTS PAGE LISTING ARTS PAGE LISTING- 123.000.640.573.100.440.00 250.00 Total : 250.00 Page: 61 Packet Page 70 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 62 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99537 10/4/2007 065374 WASHINGTON DEPT OF CORRECTION: 45-083997 INV#45-083997 CUST#7062 EDMON QUALIFICATION TARGETS 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 190.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 17.94 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 16.15 Total : 224.09 99538 10/4/2007 070264 WASHINGTON OAKES RETIREMENT 81 Assisted Living Care- Jim Martin Assisted Living Care- Jim Martin 009.000.390.517.370.290.00 3,850.00 Total : 3,850.00 99539 10/4/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0800090 TRAINING MISC Required Annual training 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 408.20 Total : 408.20 99540 10/4/2007 071933 WATSON, RICHARD JESSE WATSON1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "CHILDREN'S PICTURE BOOKS" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 145.00 99541 10/4/2007 071934 WHITCOMB, LAURA WHITCOMB1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "BEING UNFORGETTABLE" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 225.00 Total : 225.00 99542 10/4/2007 061752 WILDER CONSTRUCTION CO E7CA.Pmt 3 E7CA.Progress Pmt 3 thru 09/30/07 Page: 62 Packet Page 71 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 63 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99542 10/4/2007 061752 WILDER CONSTRUCTION CO (Continued) E7CA.Progress Pmt 3 thru 09/30/07 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 97,611.45 E7CA.Progress Pmt 3 thru 09/30/07 125.100.620.595.300.650.00 2,125.00 E7CA.Retainage Pmt 3 112.200.000.223.400.000.00 -4, 880.58 E7CA.Retainage Pmt 3 125.100.000.223.400.000.00 -106.25 Total : 94,749.62 99543 10/4/2007 064234 WILDWATER RIVER TOURS INC AMUNDSON8716 RAFTING TRIP TIETON WHITEWATER RAFTING - 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 108.72 Total : 108.72 99544 10/4/2007 070648 WISSMANN, CAROL WISSMANN1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENT[ "PROFITTING FROM PERIODICAL 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99545 10/4/2007 070649 WOOD, FRANCES WOOD1006 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "NATURE WRITING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00 Total : 125.00 99546 10/4/2007 068565 WOOTTON, SHARON WOOTTON1007 WRITE ON THE SOUND PRESENTS "TRAVEL WRITING" 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 145.00 Total : 145.00 99547 10/4/2007 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 261 UMPIRING FOR LEAGUE GAMES UMPIRING OF LEAGUE GAMES 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 1,596.00 Total : 1,596.00 99548 10/4/2007 070717 WSU URBAN & PESTICIDE SAFETY 10032007 PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATIONS Page: 63 Packet Page 72 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 64 10/04/2007 10:13:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 99548 10/4/2007 070717 WSU URBAN & PESTICIDE SAFETY (Continued) 208 Vouchers for bank code : front 208 Vouchers in this report PO # Description/Account Amount URBAN IPM & PESTICIDE SAFETY 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 200.00 Total : 200.00 Bank total : 605,453.09 Total vouchers : 605,453.09 Page: 64 Packet Page 73 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99549 10/11/2007 069634 ACCURINT - ACCT 1201641 1201641-20070930 INV#1201641-20070930 EDMONDS SEARCHES & REPORTS 09/07 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 31.50 Total : 31.50 99550 10/11/2007 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8364 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CI MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CI 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 107,277.25 Total : 107,277.25 99551 10/11/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE 110427123 SHOP - BATTERY INVENTORY SHOP -BATTERY INVENTORY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 69.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.23 110427293 UNIT 33 - BATTERY UNIT 33 - BATTERY 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 49.95 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.45 715693 FLEET SUPPLIES EXCHANGE CRE FLEET SUPPLIES EXCHANGE CRE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -36.13 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -3.22 716339 UNIT EQ10R - SPEAKER WIRE UNIT EQ10R - SPEAKER WIRE 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 129.47 Sales Tax 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 11.52 716420 UNIT EQ27PO - FLASHLIGHTS SL, UNIT EQ27PO - FLASHLIGHTS SL, 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 191.94 Sales Tax 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 17.08 Page: 1 Packet Page 74 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99551 10/11/2007 014940 ALL BATTERY SALES & SERVICE (Continued) 716993 UNIT EQ27PO - CONNECTORS SUI UNIT EQ27PO - CONNECTORS SUI 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 58.28 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 5.19 Total : 504.71 99552 10/11/2007 065568 ALLWATER INC 092007044 COEWASTE DRINKING WATER 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 16.90 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 0.62 Total : 17.52 99553 10/11/2007 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 035353-070902 APA MEMBERSHIP FOR ROB CHA\ APA MEMBERSHIP FOR ROB CHA\ 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 518.00 040706-070902 PLANNING ADVISORY SERVICE Al' PLANNING ADVISORY SERVICE AP 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 820.00 Total : 1,338.00 99554 10/11/2007 001430 AMERICAN RED CROSS 2586 CLASS FEE ADMIN FEE FOR CLASS ON 8/10 - 001.000.640.575.510.490.00 168.00 2588 CLASS FEE ADMIN FEE FOR CLASS ON 8/29 - ! 001.000.640.575.510.490.00 70.00 Total : 238.00 99555 10/11/2007 071844 AMTEST AIR QUALITY 74824 4933-001 C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 840.00 Total : 840.00 99556 10/11/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3907637 SCREEN PRINTING CHARGE Page: 2 Packet Page 75 of 333 vchlist 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 3 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99556 10/11/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) PARK MAINTENANCE- 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 249.38 512-3978096 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SE 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 33.76 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.00 Total : 286.14 99557 10/11/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3971733 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 97.06 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.64 512-3978098 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 95.90 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.54 Total : 210.14 99558 10/11/2007 069751 ARAMARK 512-3976346 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.34 Page: 3 Packet Page 76 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher front Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99558 10/11/2007 069751 ARAMARK (Continued) 512-3976347 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 512-3978097 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.60 Total : 90.44 99559 10/11/2007 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 871747052X10062007 DUANE BOWMAN WIRELESS SERA DUANE BOWMAN WIRELESS SERA 001.000.620.558.800.420.00 13.32 Page: 4 Packet Page 77 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99559 10/11/2007 064341 064341 AT&T MOBILITY (Continued) Total : 13.32 99560 10/11/2007 064341 AT&T MOBILITY X10072007 C/A 828698926 425-418-8755 Service 8/28-9/27/07 001.000.310.514.100.420.00 99.15 Total : 99.15 99561 10/11/2007 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 42312 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #300 PRINTIN( 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 149.63 UB Outsourcing area #300 PRINTIN( 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.63 UB Outsourcing area #300 PRINTIN( 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 150.09 UB Outsourcing area #300 POSTAGI 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 445.97 UB Outsourcing area #300 POSTAGI 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 445.97 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 13.32 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 13.32 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 13.35 Total : 1,381.28 99562 10/11/2007 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 68152 AWARDS AWARDS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 179.98 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 16.02 Total : 196.00 99563 10/11/2007 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0907 Nationwide background check servicf Page: 5 Packet Page 78 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99563 10/11/2007 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC (Continued) Nationwide background check servicf 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 25.00 WA State background check services 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 50.00 Total : 75.00 99564 10/11/2007 069563 BAILEY, TODD 10/07/07 CPR/FIRST AID CLASS FOR PRES( CPR/FIRST AID CLASS FOR PRES( 001.000.640.575.560.410.00 80.00 Total : 80.00 99565 10/11/2007 071947 BELAIR, CANDACE BELAIR1001 REFUND CLASS REFUND LESS ADMIN FEE 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 16.00 Total : 16.00 99566 10/11/2007 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 070915COE 09/07 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE Sept 07 Web Site Maintenance 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 300.00 Bldg Dept Page Design; graphics & jz 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 500.00 Total : 800.00 99567 10/11/2007 069116 BJY NW LOCKBOX CPA SERVICES E-001 961 CEDAR/2007-0109 PLAN REVIE 961 CEDAR/2007-0109 PLAN REVIE 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 793.06 E-003 9330-218TH PL.SW/2007-0251 PLAI 9330-218TH PL.SW/2007-0251 PLAI 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 821.83 E-004 7805-218TH ST SW/2007-0264 PLAI 7805-218TH ST SW/2007-0264 PLAI 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,363.24 E-005 7803 - 218TH ST SW BLDG A/2007- 7803 - 218TH ST SW BLDG A/2007- 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,363.24 Page: 6 Packet Page 79 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99567 10/11/2007 069116 BJY NW LOCKBOX CPA SERVICES (Continued) E-006 201-5TH AVE SO./2006-0845 PLAN 201-5TH AVE SO./2006-0845 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 3,154.45 E-011 9020-191ST PL SW/2007-0478 PLAT 9020-191 ST PL SW/2007-0478 PLAT 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 975.76 E-017 8704-200TH ST SW/2007-0609 PLAI 8704-200TH ST SW/2007-0609 PLAI 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,405.90 E-018 7807-173RD ST SW/2007-0611 PLA 7807-173RD ST SW/2007-0611 PLA 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,450.47 E-019 121 EDMONDS ST./20070627 PLAN 121 EDMONDS ST./20070627 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 414.30 E-020 403 EDMONDS ST/2007-0638 PLAN 403 EDMONDS ST/2007-0638 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 350.45 E-021 8004-240TH ST SW/2007-0635 PLAI 8004-240TH ST SW/2007-0635 PLAI 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,415.23 E-022 728 HANNA PARK ROAD/2007-0637 728 HANNA PARK ROAD/2007-0637 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 382.26 E-029 24130-76TH AV W/2007-0650 PLAN 24130-76TH AV W/2007-0650 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,041.82 E-030 17211-77TH AV W/2006-0653 PLAN 17211-77TH AV W/2006-0653 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 382.50 E-031 21607-96TH AV W/2007-0665 PLAN 21607-96TH AV W/2007-0665 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,118.83 Page: 7 Packet Page 80 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99567 10/11/2007 069116 BJY NW LOCKBOX CPA SERVICES (Continued) E-032 907 CEDAR/2007-0677 PLAN REVIE 907 CEDAR/2007-0677 PLAN REVIE 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,132.28 E-033 929 CARY RD/2007-0675 PLAN RED 929 CARY RD/2007-0675 PLAN RE% 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 921.34 E-034 636 DALEY/2007-0676 PLAN REVIE 636 DALEY/2007-0676 PLAN REVIE 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 2,337.61 E-035 OLD MILLTOWN & DAYTON & 5TH/ OLD MILLTOWN & DAYTON & 5TH/ 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 467.50 E-038 7507-212TH ST SW/20070696 PLAN 7507-212TH ST SW/20070696 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 2,103.54 E-039 24126-105TH PL W/2007-0691 PLAP 24126-105TH PL W/2007-0691 PLAP 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 695.23 E-046 18324 HOMEVIEW DR/2007-0731 P 18324 HOMEVIEW DR/2007-0731 P 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 202.03 E-047 16912 TALBOT RD/2007-0733 PLAN 16912 TALBOT RD/2007-0733 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 514.72 E-049 831 SPRAGUE/2007-0769 PLAN RE 831 SPRAGUE/2007-0769 PLAN RE 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 99.18 E-050 19120-83RD AVE W/2007-0804 PLA 19120-83RD AVE W/2007-0804 PLA 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 210.39 E-052 22706-95TH PL W/2007-0776 PLAN 22706-95TH PL W/2007-0776 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 951.83 Page: 8 Packet Page 81 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99567 10/11/2007 069116 BJY NW LOCKBOX CPA SERVICES (Continued) E-053 22708-95TH PL W/2007-0777 PLAN 22708-95TH PL W/2007-0777 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 951.83 E-054 20704-77TH PL W/2007-0791 PLAN 20704-77TH PL W/2007-0791 PLAN 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 337.66 Total : 27,358.48 99568 10/11/2007 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1463459 C-249 C-249 PROCESS CONTROL 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,316.25 Total : 1,316.25 99569 10/11/2007 064861 CAIN BOLT AND GASKET INC 70863 CIEDWA BOLTS & GASKETS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 115.68 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.08 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.30 Total : 136.06 99570 10/11/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 112291 WELDING SUPPLIES SOAPSTONE, GRINDING WHEELS, 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 45.68 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.06 RN09071021 HELIUM HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BIRTHI 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.69 Total : 58.18 99571 10/11/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN9071023 2954000 Page: 9 Packet Page 82 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99571 10/11/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) ARGON/N ITROG EN/OXYGEN 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 31.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 2.76 Total : 33.76 99572 10/11/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY112166 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 62.30 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 6.75 LY112167 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 20.77 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.05 LY112169 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 10.38 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.12 LY112178 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 30.04 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.67 Page: 10 Packet Page 83 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99572 10/11/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) RN09071020 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 15.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.450.00 1.38 Total : 195.46 99573 10/11/2007 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN09071019 SHOP - OXYGEN TANK RENTAL SHOP - OXYGEN TANK RENTAL 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.450.00 0.69 RN09071022 STORM - CYLINDER RENTAL STORM - CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 7.75 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 0.69 Total : 16.88 99574 10/11/2007 003515 CH2M HILL INC 3620924 E6MA.Services thru 09/31/07 E6MA.Services thru 09/31/07 129.000.240.595.700.650.00 1,538.68 Total : 1,538.68 99575 10/11/2007 064690 CHAMPION BOLT & SUPPLY INC 474005 EDM00001 NUTS & BOLTS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,273.61 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 109.52 Total : 1,383.13 99576 10/11/2007 065774 CHAVOND-BARRY ENGINEERING CORF 1560-091407 C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT C-248 INCINERATOR PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 1,026.45 Total : 1,026.45 Page: 11 Packet Page 84 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99577 10/11/2007 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460732821 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 46.36 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 4.12 460732822 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 125.95 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.22 460733858 UNIFORMS Stn. 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 92.40 Stn. 17 - OPS 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 92.40 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.22 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.22 460733878 OPS UNIFORMS Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.97 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.03 Total : 523.89 99578 10/11/2007 069947 CITRIX ONLINE 90598445 GoToMyPC Service for 12 Users GoToMyPC Service for 12 Users 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 1,816.52 Total : 1,816.52 99579 10/11/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5618 MAINT./OPERATIONS SEWER OC7 MAINT./OPERATIONS SEWER OC7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83 Total : 13,800.83 Page: 12 Packet Page 85 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99580 10/11/2007 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5596 INV#5596 CUST#45 EDMONDS PD NEXTEL SERVICE - AUGUST 2007 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 53.37 Total : 53.37 99581 10/11/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 1-218359-279832 2203 N 205TH ST 2203 N 205TH ST 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 13.34 Total : 13.34 99582 10/11/2007 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR AUG & SEPI WATER USEAGE FOR AUG & SEPI 411.000.654.534.800.340.00 870.00 Total : 870.00 99583 10/11/2007 069659 CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE PARKS & F ROMER01008 REGISTRATION 2007 PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATIOI 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 70.00 Total : 70.00 99584 10/11/2007 067186 CLEAR IMAGE INC 35562 INV#35562 EDMONDS PD CASE # C REPRINTS - CASE 06-0058 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 28.32 8.5% Snohomish County 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 2.41 Total : 30.73 99585 10/11/2007 071153 COLEMAN, DREW & FUSA 4-05775 RE: #4-0606-082 UTILITY REFUND RE: #4-0606-082 Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 29.79 Total : 29.79 99586 10/11/2007 061758 COLLINS, ANTHONY J SALE 696405 SALE #696405 - T.COLLINS REIMBI Page: 13 Packet Page 86 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99586 10/11/2007 061758 COLLINS, ANTHONY J iFolks 1TA1&1=1:ZyI_1IKi7_\ Z9�Y011tot QzRI Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) ACADEMY WRESTLING SHOES 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 44.99 ACADEMY MOUTH PIECE 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.99 ACADEMY MOUTHPIECE 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.99 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.60 Total : 68.57 5988 WASH DEPT L&I - PW ELECTRICAL WASH DEPT L&I - PW ELECTRICAL 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 58.00 FAC MAINT SHOP - HEAD RETURN 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 221.91 EBAY FEES FOR SELLING SAW - F 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 7.28 TOP FOODS - KWANS RETIREMEN 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 50.00 ALFY'S PIZZA - S/S/W/S NIMS TRAI 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 13.27 ALFY'S PIZZA - S/S/W/S NIMS TRAI 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 13.27 ALFY'S PIZZA - S/S/W/S NIMS TRAI 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.27 ALFY'S PIZZA - S/S/W/S NIMS TRAI 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 13.27 WSU PESTICIDE CLASSES FOR 3 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 450.00 ASSOC OF WASH/ STORMWATER 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 30.00 GUARDIAN WA SECURITY - OLD P 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 55.00 Page: 14 Packet Page 87 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher front Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99587 10/11/2007 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS (Continued) 9054 GREEN RIVER COMM - A BAILEY - GREEN RIVER COMM - A BAILEY- 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 570.00 GREEN RIVER COMM - J KOBYLK- 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 335.00 GREEN RIVER COMM - S LONG- 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 570.00 GREEN RIVER COMM - R SHORE- 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 295.00 GREEN RIVER COMM - V SMITH- 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 245.00 GREEN RIVER COMM - K KUHNHAI 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.00 Total : 3,089.27 99588 10/11/2007 061529 COMPTON, DOUGLAS SALE #696405 SALE #696405 - D.COMPTON REIM ACADEMY MOUTHPIECE 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 17.98 ACADEMY WRESTLING SHOES 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 44.99 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.60 Total : 68.57 99589 10/11/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 6872374 pagers -water Page: 15 Packet Page 88 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99589 10/11/2007 062891 COOK PAGING WA 99590 10/11/2007 005965 CUES INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) pagers -water 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 11.85 pagers -streets 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 7.90 pagers -storm 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 15.80 pagers -facilities 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 23.70 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.19 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 0.80 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 1.59 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 2.39 Total : 65.22 275584 SEWER - SLIP RING & RETRO KIT, SEWER - SLIP RING & RETRO KIT, 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1,602.50 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 95.72 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 150.61 275735 SEWER TV TRUCK - 1200' CABLE SEWER TV TRUCK - 1200' CABLE 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5,535.00 HANDLING CHARGES 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.95 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 133.92 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 504.54 Page: 16 Packet Page 89 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99590 10/11/2007 005965 005965 CUES INC (Continued) Total : 8,030.24 99591 10/11/2007 071952 CURREY POST, LINDA POST1008 CONTEST WINNER 2ND PLACE NON-FICTION 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 99592 10/11/2007 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3195869 E7AD.RFQ for Transportation Plan U E7AD.RFQ for Transportation Plan U 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 129.50 Total : 129.50 99593 10/11/2007 071953 DANFORTH, CHRISTINE L DANFORTH1008 CONTEST WINNER 2ND PLACE FICTION 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 99594 10/11/2007 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING OHMAN-DOL OHMAN - ALIEN FIREARM LICENSE ALIEN FIREARM LICENSE APPLICP 001.000.000.237.190.000.00 15.00 Total : 15.00 99595 10/11/2007 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201588167 FAC MAINT - DISP GLOVES FAC MAINT - DISP GLOVES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 134.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.26 Total : 145.26 99596 10/11/2007 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 00635760 TOTAL EXCESS COMPENSATION E TOTAL EXCESS COMPENSATION E 411.000.654.534.800.110.00 19,720.47 Total : 19,720.47 99597 10/11/2007 071948 DIEDRICK, BETSY DIEDRICK1002 REFUND CLASS REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 58.00 Page: 17 Packet Page 90 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99597 10/11/2007 071948 071948 DIEDRICK, BETSY (Continued) Total : 58.00 99598 10/11/2007 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 07-2795 INV#07-2795 EDMONDS PD TRANSCRIPTION 07-3347 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 114.80 TRANSCRIPTION 07-2955 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 75.60 TRANSCRIPTION 07-3200 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 11.20 TRANSCRIPTION IA07-006 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 14.00 Total : 215.60 99599 10/11/2007 070790 DISTINCTIVE GLASS INC 17004 CITY HALL - FURNISH AND INSTAL CITY HALL - FURNISH AND INSTAL 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 445.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 39.61 17450 LIBRARY - 24X36 MIRROR LIBRARY - 24X36 MIRROR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.34 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.86 Total : 531.81 99600 10/11/2007 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 2973421 SEWER - 2ND & DAYTON PROJEC' SEWER - 2ND & DAYTON PROJEC' 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 519.00 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 44.12 Total : 563.12 99601 10/11/2007 071842 EATON ELECTRICAL INC 24844581 208525 Page: 18 Packet Page 91 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99601 10/11/2007 071842 EATON ELECTRICAL INC (Continued) C-275 SWITCHGEAR IMPROVEMEP 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 214,209.00 Sales Tax 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 13,923.59 Total : 228,132.59 99602 10/11/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 86750 SUPPLIES OIL 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 25.08 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.23 Total : 27.31 99603 10/11/2007 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 86643 FAC MAINT - TIRE GUAGE FAC MAINT - TIRE GUAGE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.99 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.18 Total : 2.17 99604 10/11/2007 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 11748 September 2007 lunch (Mayor Haake September 2007 lunch (Mayor Haake 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 17.50 Total : 17.50 99605 10/11/2007 063066 EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ECC1004 GYM RENTAL GYM RENTAL FOR VOLLEYBALL 001.000.640.575.520.450.00 2,565.00 Total : 2,565.00 99606 10/11/2007 008550 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 EDMONDS SCHOOL DIST REC#44360/1215 OLYMPIC AVE. A[ REC#44360/1215 OLYMPIC AVE. A[ 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 99607 10/11/2007 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 103730 INV#103730 CLIENT#5118 EDMON[ Page: 19 Packet Page 92 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99607 10/11/2007 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL (Continued) SPAY FELINE IMP#7011 (FOUND & 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 43.00 NEUTER CANINE IMP#7009 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 97.50 NEUTER FELINE IMP#7095 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75 NEUTER FELINE IMP#7018 001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75 Total : 230.00 99608 10/11/2007 008965 EMPLOYEE DATA FORMS 08-51185 INV#08-51185 - EDMONDS PD VACATION SCHEDULE FORMS 20C 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.25 Total : 20.25 99609 10/11/2007 067599 EWING ELECTRIC INC EWM800 1276 M009 MCC FEEDER INSTALLATIOf 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 29,177.52 Total : 29,177.52 99610 10/11/2007 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU11176 FISHING PIER - SUPPLIES FISHING PIER - SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.80 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.78 WAMOU11251 FAC - NYLON HEX NUT FAC - NYLON HEX NUT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.75 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.07 Total : 10.40 99611 10/11/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0961458 17983 Page: 20 Packet Page 93 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99611 10/11/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued) CLAMP ASSEMBLY/COUPLING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 22.09 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.97 Total : 24.06 99612 10/11/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0113557 WATER INVENTORY -- WATER INVENTORY -- 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 319.90 W-PIPEDI-04-020 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 516.44 W-PIPEDI-06-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 540.68 W-MTRBOXPL-0.75-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 263.15 W-MTRLIDDI-0.75-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 556.80 NON INVENTORY GASKETS FOR F 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 188.00 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 195.53 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 16.73 0113557-1 WATER INVENTORY - - WATER INVENTORY - - 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 999.97 W-MTRLIDDI-0.75-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 278.40 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 113.78 Page: 21 Packet Page 94 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99612 10/11/2007 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued) 0120416 WATER INVENTORY - — WATER INVENTORY - — 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 82.45 W-PIPEPL-0.75-012 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 31.95 W-PIPECO-0.75-011 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,808.00 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 171.09 CM060143 RETURNED INVENTORY - SETTER RETURNED INVENTORY - SETTER 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -1,486.28 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 -132.28 Total : 4,464.31 99613 10/11/2007 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 Lease 00001918 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKIN 09/07 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent 001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 99614 10/11/2007 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 100589 Section 125 Plan fee - Sept. 2007 Section 125 Plan fee - Sept. 2007 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 50.00 Section 132 Participant Plan & check 811.000.000.231.590.000.00 30.90 Total : 80.90 99615 10/11/2007 071154 FLORES, JESUS & SOMER 3-58150 RE: #4-0606-082 UTILITY REFUND RE: #4-0606-082 Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 57.06 Total : 57.06 99616 10/11/2007 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY 2074889-01 BEARINGS Page: 22 Packet Page 95 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99616 10/11/2007 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY (Continued) BEARINGS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 38.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.65 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.88 Total : 47.53 99617 10/11/2007 012199 GRAINGER 9468211132 SUPPLIES FLOODLIGHT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.89 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.62 Total : 20.51 99618 10/11/2007 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 07523.00-5 E7AB.Services thru 09/22/07 E7AB.Services thru 09/22/07 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 3,667.06 Total : 3,667.06 99619 10/11/2007 012560 HACH COMPANY 5303150 112830-000 LAB SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 99.78 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 15.05 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 10.09 5312914 112830-000 PIPET TIPS 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 20.49 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 1.80 Total : 147.21 99620 10/11/2007 071218 HARBOR PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC 0601 C-161 SCREENINGS SYSTEM IMPF Page: 23 Packet Page 96 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99620 10/11/2007 071218 HARBOR PACIFIC CONTRACTORS INC (Continued) C-161 SCREENINGS SYSTEM IMPF 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 54,659.13 Total : 54,659.13 99621 10/11/2007 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 12203614 WATER INVENTORY - - WATER INVENTORY - - 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 2,085.20 W-MTRBOXPL-0.75-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,568.16 W-MTRLIDDI-0.75-010 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 1,534.56 Sales Tax 411.000.000.141.140.310.00 440.97 Total : 5,628.89 99622 10/11/2007 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC M-252547 E4GA.Services thru 08/04/07 E4GA.Services thru 08/04/07 412.300.630.594.320.650.00 8,326.46 M-256842 E4GA.Services thru 09/07/07 E4GA.Services thru 09/07/07 412.300.630.594.320.650.00 3,400.40 Total : 11, 726.86 99623 10/11/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 5278-27 RESPIRATORY/SISSON RESPIRATORY/SISSON 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 32.00 Total : 32.00 99624 10/11/2007 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 5651-13 INV#5651-13 - EDMONDS PD - EMF 0-RESPIRATORY QUESTIONNAIRE 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 57.00 Total : 57.00 99625 10/11/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 6-8941 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM- I Page: 24 Packet Page 97 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99625 10/11/2007 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (Continued) WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM- 1 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 16.78 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM- 1 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 16.78 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM- 1 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 16.78 WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM- I 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 16.79 Total : 67.13 99626 10/11/2007 069952 HUGHES, HOLLY HUGHES0927 WORKSHOP TEACH WRITE ON THE SOUND PR 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 376.00 Total : 376.00 99627 10/11/2007 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 18175 ESJA.Services thru 09/29/07 ESJA.Services thru 09/29/07 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 3,531.83 Total : 3,531.83 99628 10/11/2007 065947 INT'L SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE 21758 MEMBERSHIP FEE PACIFIC NW PROFESSIONAL MEM 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 155.00 Total : 155.00 99629 10/11/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE 449900 SHOP SUPPLIES - HANDLE, - SHOP SUPPLIES - HANDLE, - 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 34.90 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.11 449901 UNIT 135 - COILS UNIT 135 - COILS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 105.16 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.36 Page: 25 Packet Page 98 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99629 10/11/2007 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PART WAREHOUSE (Continued) 449921 UNIT 6 - STREAMLIGHT UNIT 6 - STREAMLIGHT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 137.79 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.26 Total : 302.58 99630 10/11/2007 071957 JOHN HAMM MD 039122-01 ACCT#039122-01 CONSULTATION W/S.SNYDER 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 225.00 Total : 225.00 99631 10/11/2007 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS Addendum 4.2 E1 DB.Services thru 08/31/07 E1 DB.Services thru 08/31/07 125.100.620.595.300.650.00 770.58 E2DB.23 E2DB.Services thru 08/31/07 E2DB.Services thru 08/31/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 2,177.00 Total : 2,947.58 99632 10/11/2007 068493 L.E.E.D. 10010704 INV#10010704 EDMONDS PD STREAMLIGHT SL20X LAMP MODL 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 55.80 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 7.95 King County Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 5.61 Total : 69.36 99633 10/11/2007 071951 LAMB, LINDA LAMB1008 CONTEST WINNER 1ST PLACE POETRY 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00 Total : 100.00 99634 10/11/2007 065680 LIFE ASSIST 452822 ALS EXPENDABLE TOOLS Page: 26 Packet Page 99 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher front Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99634 10/11/2007 065680 LIFE ASSIST (Continued) conterra airway -pro 001.000.510.526.100.359.00 149.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.359.00 13.33 Total : 163.08 99635 10/11/2007 068258 LIFE RESCUE INC LR708 TRAINING MISC confined space -Chao 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 350.00 Total : 350.00 99636 10/11/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 095856 BUSINESS CARDS COURT PD FIRE Page: 27 Packet Page 100 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99636 10/11/2007 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 99637 10/11/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 250-00167 Business Cards:- 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 39.00 250-00167 William K. Nelson 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 14.00 250-00167 Ross Sutton 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 14.00 250-00167 Mark J. Correira 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 14.00 250-00167 Brian McAllister 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 14.00 250-00167 Kristen A. Hammersmark 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 14.00 250-00167 John Westfall 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 14.00 250-00167 Jaime Hawkins 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 14.00 250-00167 Theresa M. Umbaugh 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 14.00 Sales Tax 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 3.47 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 2.49 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 3.74 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 1.25 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 2.49 Total : 164.44 531844 UNIT 485 - T RD END UNIT 485 - T RD END 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.10 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.75 Page: 28 Packet Page 101 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99637 10/11/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 531979 UNIT EQ10FI - HARDWARE UNIT EQ10FI - HARDWARE 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 9.99 Sales Tax 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 0.89 532066 UNIT EQ10FI - SPLIT POLY LOOM UNIT EQ10FI - SPLIT POLY LOOM 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 46.00 Sales Tax 511.200.657.548.680.310.00 4.09 532600 UNIT 238 - CLEANER UNIT 238 - CLEANER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.69 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.86 532642 UNIT 55 - SEPENTINE BELT UNIT 55 - SEPENTINE BELT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 34.41 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.06 532763 UNIT 189 - SERPENTINE BELT UNIT 189 - SERPENTINE BELT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 33.22 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.96 532769 UNIT 189 - FUEL FILTER UNIT 189 - FUEL FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.39 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.10 532790 UNIT 189 - SEALS, AIR FILTER UNIT 189 - SEALS, AIR FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.30 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.16 Page: 29 Packet Page 102 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99637 10/11/2007 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 533370 UNIT 16 - FUSES UNIT 16 - FUSES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.96 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.62 Total : 238.55 99638 10/11/2007 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 578715 WATER DEPT - FUEL CAP WATER DEPT - FUEL CAP 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.63 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.68 Total : 8.31 99639 10/11/2007 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 45845 YOST POOL CHEMICALS YOST POOL CHEMICALS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 53.70 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.78 Total : 58.48 99640 10/11/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 72834697 123106800 TURCITE ROD 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 171.34 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.14 72866654 123106800 TIME DELAY FUSE/HOSE COUPLII\ 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 274.98 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.87 Page: 30 Packet Page 103 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99640 10/11/2007 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO (Continued) 72972092 123106800 NEOPRENE RUBBER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 84.62 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.37 73034014 1410328-01 TURCITE ROD 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 186.98 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.57 73047039 123106800 M010 OUTSIDE BIOSOLIDS 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 354.05 Freight 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 57.79 73091673 123106800 STEEL OPEN THIMBLE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.80 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.78 73125982 123106800 ACRYLIC PANEL MOUNT FLOWME 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 158.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.09 Total : 1,325.78 99641 10/11/2007 071946 MILLER, KATHY 0158208 REFUND FOR 0158208 IMPOUND 7 SPAY/NEUTER REFUND IMP#7011 001.000.000.343.930.000.00 50.00 Total : 50.00 99642 10/11/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 49788 RENTAL Page: 31 Packet Page 104 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99642 10/11/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC (Continued) LECTURN RENTAL 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 65.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 5.79 Total : 70.79 99643 10/11/2007 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 56171 17967 CONCRETE MIXER 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 55.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 4.90 Total : 59.90 99644 10/11/2007 069105 MONROE, DOROTHY MONROE1008 CONTEST WINNER 2ND PLACE POETRY 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 75.00 Total : 75.00 99645 10/11/2007 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Eng.Sept 2007 Engineering Nextel thru 09/24/07 Engineering Nextel thru 09/24/07 001.000.620.532.200.420.00 539.72 Total : 539.72 99646 10/11/2007 024910 NORMED 24808-531996 INV#24808-531996 EDMONDS PD Page: 32 Packet Page 105 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99646 10/11/2007 024910 NORMED Invoice (Continued) 99647 10/11/2007 063034 NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES 224677 99648 10/11/2007 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1751409.001 �YiF�7i[!�'7[iI�ya PO # Description/Account NUTRALOX ANTACID 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 CETAFEN NON -ASPIRIN 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 CETAFEN EXTRA NON -ASPIRIN 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 ASPIRIN 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 Total 13465 BOD SEED 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 Total 2091 SELECTOR SWITCH 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2091 SHALLOW BLOCK 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 Total Amount 8.84 1.64 5.38 7.44 4.84 7.56 3.18 38.88 158.00 6.52 164.52 44.24 3.80 25.70 2.21 75.95 Page: 33 Packet Page 106 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99649 10/11/2007 068663 NORTHERN ENERGY PROPANE 290217 LIFT ST 10 - PROPANE FEES LIFT ST 10 - PROPANE FEES 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 134.52 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.57 290218 LIFT ST 12 - PROPANE CHARGES LIFT ST 12 - PROPANE CHARGES 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 208.52 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 17.93 Total : 372.54 99650 10/11/2007 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0083297 SODIUM BISULFITE SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 675.75 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 60.14 0083397 SODIUM HYDROXIDE SODIUM HYDROXIDE 411.000.656.538.800.310.52 2,135.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.52 190.02 Total : 3,060.91 99651 10/11/2007 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0571513 HONEY BUCKET CREDIT HONEY BUCKET CREDIT 9/4 - 9/19 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 -47.66 0586107 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 360.58 0587994 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:- 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29 Total : 493.21 99652 10/11/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 505 9/26/07 PLANNING BOARD MINUTE Page: 34 Packet Page 107 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99652 10/11/2007 025690 NOYES, KARIN (Continued) 9/26/07 PLANNING BOARD MINUTE 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 345.00 Total : 345.00 99653 10/11/2007 066798 OBRIEN, SUZANNE Ref#587612 REF#587612 - S. O'BRIEN REIMBUF DEPARTMENT COFFEE POT 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 69.99 HOT/COLD CUPS FOR DEPARTME 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 41.16 COOKIES/CHIEF SWEARING IN- 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 35.94 COFFEE FOR CHIEF'S SWEARING 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.99 NAPKINS FOR CHIEF'S SWEARINC 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.99 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.51 Total : 172.58 99654 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 940368 OFFICE SUPPLIES TONER, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 116.13 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.33 Total : 126.46 99655 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 086091 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 77.25 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 6.88 Page: 35 Packet Page 108 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99655 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 99656 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 160615 OFFICE SUPPLIES Chair for Deputy Clerk 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 145.60 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 12.95 Total : 242.68 077502 Tape for Label Maker -IT Tape for Label Maker -IT 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 46.52 Staper & Staples 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 27.12 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 4.14 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 2.41 103027 Dry Erase Set; Hook; Cleaner; Fan Dry Erase Set; Hook; Cleaner; Fan 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 29.98 Dymo Label Writer Bldg Dept 001.000.620.524.100.310.00 92.99 Calendars; Binder; Labels 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 151.76 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 2.67 Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.310.00 8.28 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 13.50 Page: 36 Packet Page 109 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99656 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 99657 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 152744 Calendars IT Calendars IT 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 20.24 Calendarsl Binders; Post its; Tabs 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 56.41 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1.80 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 5.02 Total : 462.84 104114 INV#104114 ACCT#520437 250POL Page: 37 Packet Page 110 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99657 10/11/2007 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC Invoice (Continued) 99658 10/11/2007 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 PO # Description/Account Amount RETRACTABLE BADGE HOLDERS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 48.14 NAMETAGS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.94 REFERENCE RACK 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 22.01 CLASSIFICATION FOLDERS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 20.44 "ORIGINAL" STAMP 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.53 DESK CALENDAR FOR SUZANNE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 12.46 DYMO SHIPPING LABELS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 66.12 CORRECTION FLUID 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.87 BOX OF STAPLES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.22 STENO BOOKS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 24.00 PLANNER FOR SGT SMITH 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.46 FAX TONER FOR RECORDS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 86.55 PLANNER FOR CAMERON 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 10.56 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 27.66 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 0.94 Total : 349.90 WATER/SEWER 23700 104TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 192.30 Page: 38 Packet Page 111 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99658 10/11/2007 026200 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (Continued) Total : 192.30 99659 10/11/2007 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 704001 NEW ELGIN STREET SWEEPER / F NEW ELGIN STREET SWEEPER / F 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 179,915.00 Sales Tax 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 16,552.18 Total : 196,467.18 99660 10/11/2007 071954 OWEN, GLEN OWEN0803 REFUND RETURN OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT FC 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 200.00 Total : 200.00 99661 10/11/2007 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 360068 Copier Maint for PW- Copier Maint for PW- 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 114.00 COPIER COLOR FEE FOR PW- 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 21.89 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.480.00 12.09 Total : 147.98 99662 10/11/2007 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 9898188 COPIER CONTRACT COPIER CONTRACT 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 145.22 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 12.60 Total : 157.82 99663 10/11/2007 069690 PERFORMANCE RADIATOR 438250 UNIT 16 - RADIATOR UNIT 16 - RADIATOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 279.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.83 Total : 303.83 Page: 39 Packet Page 112 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 99664 10/11/2007 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC PCASH1010 PO # Description/Account PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT Amount Page: 40 Packet Page 113 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99664 10/11/2007 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) SISTER CITY SUPPLIES FOR SATL 623.200.210.557.210.310.00 11.43 DISCOVERY PROGRAM MILEAGE 1 001.000.640.574.350.430.00 11.13 SISTER CITY PARKING @ SEATAC 623.200.210.557.210.430.00 2.00 SISTER CITY PARKING @ BALLARI 623.200.210.557.210.430.00 10.00 WOTS SUPPLIES 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 5.98 PLASTIC CASES FOR RADIOS & B/ 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 6.47 CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR GYMNASTI, 001.000.640.575.550.310.00 6.90 WRITE ON THE SOUND SUPPLIES 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 5.98 WOTS SUPPLIES 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 5.98 PARKING @ SEA TAC FOR SISTEF; 623.200.210.557.210.430.00 8.00 PARKING FOR SISTER CITY 623.200.210.557.210.430.00 8.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - DISC 001.000.640.574.350.430.00 4.37 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUPF 001.000.640.575.560.490.00 11.31 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUPF 001.000.640.575.560.310.00 0.62 STAMPS - MEADOWDALE PRESCF 001.000.640.575.560.420.00 5.33 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUPF 001.000.640.575.560.310.00 22.13 PHOTOS 001.000.640.575.560.490.00 8.83 Page: 41 Packet Page 114 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99664 10/11/2007 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC (Continued) PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.560.310.00 36.77 DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 3.49 SISTER CITY SUPPLIES 623.200.210.557.210.310.00 57.53 DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 3.26 WHIFFLE BALLS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 11.99 Total : 247.50 99665 10/11/2007 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 11060 Wtrfrnt Devlp MISC STEP 2A WTRFRNT Pmt #4 Waterfront Redevlp 8/1-8/31/ 001.000.240.513.110.410.00 2,038.93 Total : 2,038.93 99666 10/11/2007 065105 PORT SUPPLY 6035 UNIT EQ10FI - POWER PACKS UNIT EQ10FI - POWER PACKS 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 72.58 Sales Tax 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 6.46 6141 UNIT EQ10FI - CABLE CLAMPS UNIT EQ10FI - CABLE CLAMPS 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 12.58 Sales Tax 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 1.12 893 UNIT EQ10FI - CEILING LED LITE A UNIT EQ10FI - CEILING LED LITE A 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 107.93 Sales Tax 511.200.657.594.480.640.00 9.61 Total : 210.28 99667 10/11/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -Cl Page: 42 Packet Page 115 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99667 10/11/2007 064088 PROTECTION ONE (Continued) 24 hour alarm monitoring-CH- 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00 Total : 35.00 99668 10/11/2007 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANI 0019731-IN EDMCITW CAUTION/DANGER TAPE/LOCK 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 51.10 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 4.29 Total : 55.39 99669 10/11/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY 411.000.656.538.800.472.63 461.76 Total : 461.76 99670 10/11/2007 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 3689976003 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 200 Dayton St -Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 21.30 Total : 21.30 99671 10/11/2007 031060 RADIX CORPORATION 7119034-IN RADIX MONTHLY MAINT NOV 07 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT NOV 07 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 166.28 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 14.81 Total : 181.09 99672 10/11/2007 071696 RANKINS, KATE RANKINS1006 GYM MONITOR GYM MONITOR FOR DANCE CLAS, 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 24.00 Total : 24.00 99673 10/11/2007 069103 ROGERS, MAUREEN ROGERS1008 CONTEST WINNER 1ST PLACE NON-FICTION 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00 Page: 43 Packet Page 116 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99673 10/11/2007 069103 069103 ROGERS, MAUREEN (Continued) Total : 100.00 99674 10/11/2007 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY C/A 70014 INVOICE FOR 9/30/07 - EDMONDS DISPOSE OF 3 ANIMAL CARCASSE 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 29.25 DISPOSE OF 3 ANIMAL CARCASE 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 29.25 DISPOSE OF 5 ANIMAL CARCASSE 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 48.75 DISPOSE OF 1 ANIMAL CARCASS 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 9.75 Total : 117.00 99675 10/11/2007 036041 SETINA MFG CO 150897 UNIT EQ27PO - PAIR PUSH PADS, UNIT EQ27PO - PAIR PUSH PADS, 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 419.20 Freight 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 22.10 Sales Tax 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 37.07 150898 UNIT 679 - PAIR PUSH PADS, PAIR UNIT 679 - PAIR PUSH PADS, PAIR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 407.20 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.56 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 36.02 Total : 943.15 99676 10/11/2007 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0068416-IN UNIT EQ27PO - SPEAKERS, BRACI UNIT EQ27PO - SPEAKERS, BRACI 511.100.657.548.680.350.00 356.60 Total : 356.60 99677 10/11/2007 065318 SNO CO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERV 99501 ALS PROF SERVICES Page: 44 Packet Page 117 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99677 10/11/2007 065318 SNO CO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERV (Continued) 2008 Med Prog Dir 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 9,438.50 Total : 9,438.50 99678 10/11/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL IRRIGATION CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 28.77 5070014260 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.23 Total : 59.00 99679 10/11/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 357022042 463-001-867-1 9805 EDMONDS WAY/WESTGATE 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.06 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.68 618011482 620-001-500-3 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 6.37 Total : 36.11 99680 10/11/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 4510017488 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.23 4640017416 TELEMETRY SYSTEM TELEMETRY SYSTEM 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 28.52 6000013000 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 8,448.65 6100013009 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,944.24 Page: 45 Packet Page 118 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 46 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99680 10/11/2007 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 6100013306 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 170.07 6200013008 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,814.76 Total : 18,436.47 99681 10/11/2007 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 36366 5 "ROCKERY STAMPS FOR ENGINI 5 "ROCKERY STAMPS FOR ENGINI 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 148.32 Total : 148.32 99682 10/11/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587-0930 DISPOSAL SERVICES DISPOSAL SERVICES- 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 576.16 Total : 576.16 99683 10/11/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 23.38 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.40 Total : 24.78 99684 10/11/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS garbage & recycle for PS 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 487.49 03585 garbage & recycle for FAC garbage & recycle for FAC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.90 03586 garbage & recycle for Library garbage & recycle for Library 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 599.41 Page: 46 Packet Page 119 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 47 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99684 10/11/2007 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) 03588 garbage & recycle -City Hall garbage & recycle -City Hall 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 379.46 Total : 2,023.26 99685 10/11/2007 067444 STANLEY M SLOWIK INC D.ANDERSON D.ANDERSON/PRE-EMPLOYMENT REG ISTRATION/D.ANDERSON- 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 325.00 Total : 325.00 99686 10/11/2007 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON 2007 Unclaimed 2007 UNCLAIMED CHECKS Check #85556 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 25.00 Check #86449 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 292.13 Check #88307 001.000.000.343.200.000.00 250.00 Total : 567.13 99687 10/11/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2607541 OPS SUPPLIES Stns supplies -floor dry 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 49.90 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 4.29 Total : 54.19 99688 10/11/2007 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2606442 WATER - RIDGE QUICK ACTING CI WATER - RIDGE QUICK ACTING CI 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 216.75 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 18.64 Total : 235.39 99689 10/11/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1185614 FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES Page: 47 Packet Page 120 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 48 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99689 10/11/2007 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY (Continued) FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 30.80 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.74 1185615 FAC - ELECT SUPPLIES FAC - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 99.52 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.86 1195506 CEMETERY - ELECT SUPPLIES CEMETERY - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 39.26 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.49 1196505 FAC MAINT - 130V LAMPS, 9 V BAT FAC MAINT - 130V LAMPS, 9 V BAT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 257.52 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.92 Total : 465.11 99690 10/11/2007 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10591112 SUPPLIES TAPPING SCREWS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.27 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.19 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.18 Total : 26.64 99691 10/11/2007 071577 TAYLOR, KATHLEEN 1014 CONSULTANT SERVICES 9/27-10/4 CONSULTANT SERVICES 9/27-10/4 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 1,300.00 Total : 1,300.00 Page: 48 Packet Page 121 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 49 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 99692 10/11/2007 063575 TEE'S PLUS SCREEN PRINTING FAC 255196 99693 10/11/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 99694 10/11/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1537788 148134-9/30/2007 PO # Description/Account INV#255196 CUST#5145 EDMONDE DARE EMBROIDERED CAPS 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE BIKE BOTTLES 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE YO-YO 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARELANYARDS 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE GALAXY PENS 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE POP UP NAME CARDS 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE FLASHLIGHT KEY RINGS 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE MEDALLIONS 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 DARE MINI MAGLIGHT FLASHLIGH 001.000.410.521.310.310.00 Total ; E7AD.RFQ for Transportation Plan U E7AD.RFQ for Transportation Plan U 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 Total ; WWTP Lab Tech ad, #07-38 Amount 250.00 112.50 75.00 187.50 35.00 90.00 112.50 295.75 300.00 1,458.25 51.84 51.84 Page: 49 Packet Page 122 of 333 vchlist 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 50 Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99694 10/11/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY (Continued) WWTP Lab Tech ad, #07-38 411.000.656.538.800.440.00 67.76 Lab Tech ad, #07-38 411.000.656.538.800.440.00 55.44 Planner or Senior Planner, #07-39 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 49.28 Court Clerk, #07-40 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 18.48 Parks Dept. Laborer ad, #07-42 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 24.64 Volunteer FF, #07-43 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 18.48 Street Maint. Worker I, #07-37 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 24.64 Total : 258.72 99695 10/11/2007 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1533698 NEWSPAPER AD Council & Plann Agendas 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,509.64 1541329 NEWSPAPE AD Hearing - Park Site 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 36.00 1541331 NEWSPAPER AD Closed Record: Rezone on Edmonds 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 43.20 Total : 1,588.84 99696 10/11/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES C/A 042483000 WWTP Lab Tech ad, #07-38 Page: 50 Packet Page 123 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 51 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99696 10/11/2007 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES (Continued) WWTP Lab Tech ad, #07-38 411.000.656.538.800.440.00 305.42 WWTP Lab. Tech ad, #07-38 411.000.656.538.800.440.00 165.94 Planner or Senior Planner ad, #07-38 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 366.02 Planner or Senior Planner ad, #07-38 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 366.02 Court Clerk,#07-04 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 302.20 Parks Dept. Laborer, #07-42 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 327.64 Street Maint. Worker 1 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 353.08 Total : 2,186.32 99697 10/11/2007 069357 THIES, MIKE THIES CODE ENFORCEMENT CONFEREN CODE ENFORCEMENT CONFEREN 001.000.620.558.800.430.00 320.41 Total : 320.41 99698 10/11/2007 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 867809 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MON SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MON 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 10.57 Total : 10.57 99699 10/11/2007 070577 TNEMEC CO INC 010295817 PAINT PAINT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 114.75 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 55.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 15.12 Total : 184.87 Page: 51 Packet Page 124 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 52 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99700 10/11/2007 064963 TOP FOODS 391289 OPS SUPPLIES battery 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 4.99 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 0.44 Total : 5.43 99701 10/11/2007 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 13770 FAC MAINT- TUBULAR KEYS FAC MAINT- TUBULAR KEYS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.87 13777 CITY HALL - KEYS AND BLANKS CITY HALL - KEYS AND BLANKS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.11 13819 FAC MAINT - KEYS, SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - KEYS, SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.89 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.93 Total : 72.30 99702 10/11/2007 071590 TRT LCC 7 HEARING EXAMINER SERVICES F( HEARING EXAMINER SERVICES F( 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,512.65 Total : 3,512.65 99703 10/11/2007 065934 TUNE TALES INC TUNETALES8558 TUNE TALES CLASSES PAYMENT 1 OF 2- 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 3,036.00 Total : 3,036.00 99704 10/11/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 7671796 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES Page: 52 Packet Page 125 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 53 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99704 10/11/2007 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY (Continued) PVC PIPE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 364.50 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.44 Total : 396.94 99705 10/11/2007 071913 VALHALLA PROPERTIES KUTASHVILE REC#44510/KUTASHVILI-PAID FOR REC#44510/KUTASHVILI-PAID FOR 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 135.00 VALHALLA PROPERTIES REC#44728.DOUBLE CHARGED FC REC#44728.DOUBLE CHARGED FC 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 570.00 Total : 705.00 99706 10/11/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.92 425-771-4741 EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 60.42 Total : 105.34 99707 10/11/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE FS #16-FAX LINE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 52.76 Total : 52.76 99708 10/11/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STAT Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at P 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.83 425-673-5978 LIFT STATION #1 Lift Station #1 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 49.37 Page: 53 Packet Page 126 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 54 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99708 10/11/2007 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST (Continued) 425-771-0158 FS # 16 FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 236.63 425-776-6829 CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 237.92 Total : 564.75 99709 10/11/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0591211699 CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION CENTRALIZED IRRIGATION 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 1.92 Total : 1.92 99710 10/11/2007 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0590539116 INV#0590539116 ACCT#470497482- CELL PHONES 8/24-9/23/07 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 123.06 Total : 123.06 99711 10/11/2007 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 31941697 1066294 FILTER GLASS/PIPET 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 245.69 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 21.87 Total : 267.56 99712 10/11/2007 046100 WA ST ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS INC 100907 MISCELLANEOUS Fire Chief, Ex. Asst. 001.000.510.522.100.490.00 231.25 Asst Chief, Admin BC 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 412.50 Fire Marshal 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 206.25 Total : 850.00 99713 10/11/2007 071949 WALKER, IRENE WALKER0924 REFUND Page: 54 Packet Page 127 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 55 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 99713 10/11/2007 071949 WALKER, IRENE (Continued) POINT OF SALE REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 148.00 Total : 148.00 99714 10/11/2007 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL EDM201 TRAINING MISC MCO training 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00 F0800053 TRAINING MISC Dropp,Johnston, Karg 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 9,090.00 food & housing 001.000.510.522.400.430.00 4,395.00 Total : 13,885.00 99715 10/11/2007 063074 WESTERN POWER AND EQUIPMENT F41298 WATER/SEWER - BACKHOE BUCK WATER/SEWER - BACKHOE BUCK 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 574.52 WATER/SEWER - BACKHOE BUCK 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 574.52 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 51.14 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 51.13 Total : 1,251.31 99716 10/11/2007 071955 WOODARD, BRIAN WOODARD1008 REFUND REFUND OF PLAZA ROOM DAMAG 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 485.00 Total : 485.00 99717 10/11/2007 070123 WOODARD, MARCIA WOODARD0717 WORKSHOP TEACHING WRITE ON THE SOUNE 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 282.00 Total : 282.00 99718 10/11/2007 070256 WSP OHMAN - WSP ALIEN FIREARM LICENSE - OHMA� Page: 55 Packet Page 128 of 333 vchlist Voucher List Page: 56 10/11/2007 11:09:37AM City of Edmonds Bank code : front Voucher Date Vendor 99718 10/11/2007 070256 WSP 170 Vouchers for bank code 170 Vouchers in this report Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) ALIEN FIREARM LICENSE APPLICP 001.000.000.237.190.000.00 25.00 FBI FINGERPRINT CARD 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 24.00 Total : 49.00 front Bank total : 822,627.15 Total vouchers : 822,627.15 Page: 56 Packet Page 129 of 333 AM-1194 2.D. Claim for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Linda Hynd Submitted For: Sandy Chase Time: Consent Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Action Review Committee: A rtinn Infnrmntinn Subject Title Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Janet Henry ($364.00), Brad and Heather Sturgill (amount undetermined), and Diane McEachron (amount undetermined). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages. Previous Council Action Not applicable. Narrative A Claim for Damages has been received from the following individuals: Janet Henry 955 Cedar Street Edmonds, WA 98020 ($364.00) Brad and Heather Sturgill 521 12th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (amount undetermined) Diane McEachron 560 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 (amount undetermined) Fiscal Impact A ttnrhmPntc Link: Henry Claim for Damages Link: Sturgill Claim for Damages Link: McEachron Claim for Damages Packet Page 130 of 333 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/10/2007 10:46 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/10/2007 11:12 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/10/2007 11:29 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Started On: 10/02/2007 03:58 Hynd PM Final Approval Date: 10/10/2007 Packet Page 131 of 333 RECEIVED OCT 0`12007 EDMONDS CITY CLERK CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that `aY C4. '� �� e' �� who resides at -15 � �y E' �� I' ad H o riA S w pr 9 002 c) mailing address S'Vt A, e= , home phone #4;L-Iv_ I�Awork phone # is claiming damages against B Xe t0!; 0t,; ifitxi in the sum of $ (( 364. arising out of the following circumstances listed below. -- DATE OF OCCURRENCE: \.(/ le C -r TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: �h b N �"' -a L L o ff t4 a s ie e v s, o o -ro H e DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. "a at- 14-33W CALLe-d He- de ccCovvel-s i-iou C ha ha.ue- \Dc 0 r;-eg osk;,h<<— 4oi,. Soave -96rt4 &f LelaL R-actic�e—. 4 A-ft Eu t,aWti SNG r�tfiae- f.e-d Got-r�s powde a i.g aL FgC f 0E- K%s iMe ca vei-1- QAa or;s Ct }eMewt'5 tue-l~e+aLSe �s 31Q a r-ee- HaJj t-ed -Coy- i - aoLL a c- S (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) /ffA ? 4? 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. Qodia 9-oLa35. '1--30 2, �-twity pi+s ';N- I , µaNSyi l.l-e, l.., A 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. / 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes """No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: (year) DRIVER: Address: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * (make) Driver License # (model) _ OWNER: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Address: Name: Address: OCT 0:=12007 Packet Page 132 of 333 EDMONDS CITY cLExK# * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * being first duly sworn, de and that 1 am the claimant for the above depose say described; that I have read the ab6ve claim, know the contents thereof and believe the true. X X Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of.oG.ci� I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that J 4is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes me ' ned in the instrument. Dated 6 — —O 1V/,L Signaure (OYt�-t.H.( Title T My appointment expires-Q'"7 Notary Public State bf Wdthington VERNON.,WOODS' M:y Appointment Expires NOV 27,. 2007 Packet Page 133 of 333 From: dearjanet@comcast.net To: dearjanet@comcast.net Subject: Fw: Communications re Cedar St. Date: Monday, October 01, 2007 2:19:59 PM Gary - Please note the following confirmation from both my attorney and the Edmonds City Attorney, that no communication was made to either Robert Heller or myself following the survey of Cedar Street 13 months ago. I'm sure you recall my consternation and confusion when you told me Scott Snyder had called my attorney last August following the survey and he failed to communicate that conversation to me. further that Robert told Scott, "He Understood" (the City's position). As I told you then, it didn't make sense to me because we were waiting to hear directly from Dwayne Bowman (as he promised) to decide what action we would take after the City's review of the survey. My friend, Dody, who was with me when you called & overheard our conversation, was equally puzzled. In an effort to sort out the confusion, It was necessary to call upon Robert Heller to get clarification of your statements. The bill for that legal service is $364.00. I want to be very clear that I am not implying you knowingly passed along false and untrue information to me. However, I have incurred this bill for no other reason than you did just that (as verified by the phone calls and Emails attached to this memo between Messrs. Snyder and Heller. I will send you a copy of that bill in another Email. It needs to be paid by the individual(s) who perpetrated the false information - - or the City. From: W. Scott Snyder [mailto:ssnyder@omwlaw.com] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 12:13 PM To: Heller, Robert Subject: RE: Communications re Cedar St. That is correct. I have stated my opinion that adverse possession resolves city ownership of the Cedar Street footprint. Except as indicated below, we have had no communication since last summer, and you have not acknowledged any city right in Ms. Henry's property, on her behalf or otherwise. I did contact you last week to ask if you continue to represent Ms. Henry in the hopes of conveying an offer to release a cloud arising from a mis-located sewer easement in exchange for an acknowledgment of the city's adversely possessed right of way. Packet Page 134 of 333 Scott W. Scott Snyder Attorney at Law OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE, PLLC 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 447-7000 ssnyder@omwlaw.com http:www.omwiaw.com From: Heller, Robert[mailto:rheller@Riddellwilliams.com] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 12:00 PM To: W. Scott Snyder Subject: Communications re Cedar St. Scott, I'm writing to follow-up on our phone conversation of this morning. You confirmed that 1) you and I had no communications of any kind following the City's preparation of a survey of the Cedar St. area in summer 2006, and 2) at no time have I ever in any communication to you stated any acknowledgement of, understanding about or waiver concerning any alleged claim or right that the City may be asserting over any part of the Janet Henry properties on Cedar St. Please send me back an email to confirm in writing the above. I will copy these communications to Janet Henry. Thank you, Robert I. Heller Riddell Williams P.S. 1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 4500 Seattle, WA 98154-1065 ph: 206.389-1580 fax: 206.389.1708 E-mail: RHellerV)RiddellWilliams.com Packet Page 135 of 333 RZDDE-LE WHAAAMS P.S. 1001 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 4500 1 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154-1192 206.624.3600 1206.389.1708 FAcsIMILE W W W.RIDDELLWILLIAMS.COM Janet Henry 955 Cedar Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: City of Edmonds Invoice# 496649 Invoice Date 08/31/2007 Billing through 08/15/2007 Client Number 62915 Matter Number 00001. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED: 07/27/2007 Heller, Robert Telephone call from Janet Henry 0.60 hrs. $168.00 regarding her discussions with Mayor, and Scott Snyder allegations regarding his conversations with me; review file regarding, communication with Scott Snyder; telephone call to Scott Snyder's office; prepare e-mail message to Janet Henry 08/02/2007 Heller, Robert Telephone call to Scott Snyder's office; 0.10 hrs. $28.00 telephone call from Scott Snyder's assistant; prepare e-mail message to client; review email from client 08/06/2007 Heller, Robert Telephone conference with Scott 0.50 hrs. $140.00 Snyder; prepare e-mail message to same confirming telephone conference; review email from Scott Snyder and forward to client 08/15/2007 Heller, Robert Telephone call from client regarding 0.10 hrs. $28,00 communication with Scott Snyder CURRENT FEES ------------- 1.30 hrs. $364,Q0 TIMEKEEPER SUMMARY: Timekeeper . Hours Rate Amount Make checks payable to Riddell Williams P.S. Balance due upon receipt. Late charge of one percent per month will be added on past due balances. PLEASE RETURN COPY WITH YOUR REMITTANCE Packet Page 136 of 333 R.IDDELL WILLIAMS P.S. 1001 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 4500 1 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154-1192 20&624.3600 1206.389.1708 FAcsIMILE WWW_RIDDELLWILUAMS. COM Heller, Robert 1.30 at 280.00 FOR COSTS ADVANCED AND EXPENSES INCURRED: CURRENTEXPENSES BILLING SUMMARY: Total professional services Total of new charges for this invoice TOTAL BALANCE NOW DUE 62915 00001 Invoice# 496649 $364.00 $364.00 . .... . ....................... $364.00 -------------------------------- $364.00 Make checks payable to Riddell Williams P.S. Balance due upon receipt. Late charge of one percent per month will be added on past due balances. PLEASE RETURN COPY WITH YOUR REMITTANCE Packet Page 137 of 333 Page 2 --------------- -.......... $0.00 IDRIVER: Address: I Phone#: Passengers: Name: Address: CITY OF EDMONDS OCT 0 8 2007 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Please take note that ?r4 �t/ °— ` K— 5� �9_i r% who resides at S� % �Z � � IV mailing address 54,rt; home phone # 41257299y1 work phone #Ao6o"X is claiming damages against in the sum of $ ?-12b arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: / ��% dd 7 TIME: 6,'d0 n_,1>1 . LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: .S-2 / /2 a -4-r Al 59cPa2,:::Z DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. Ga y ��f= c if crp ,r., X �t�s� GL�e�ydr (attach an extra sheet for additional if needed) i�, lrirls' 71 ee xe- . 2. t Provide a list //of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. iiirz' r „_ rfi� Sh /ice is ../'� . .� a L- y:sa.,.... _ ../ ., R� � . _) S., w . Jn✓/' /'�%/Sef.� � l+f �iv % ��ea S� .uxr�""Do ten✓ 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 7-0 �E 611&04e 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? ✓Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:��' and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * License Plate # Type Auto: _ (year) (make) (model) OWNER: Address: Phone#: Name: Address: Driver License # * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. 447- . Signature of Claimant(s) ,, ,,,Packet Page 138 of 333 * *.NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED h KZQ S rr�ro CI � ,being first duly sworn, depose and say that. I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the s o e X X Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of�� 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 0919 f7�iGL is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: //O 91.Z0p 7 Signature // nn . _ �►. 41 Titleat3.� My appointment expires iP-1— / 1- /D Packet Page 139 of 333 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS OCT. 0 5 2007 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES- FORM EDN40NDS CITY CLERK Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that ��/ /�%� /p� ®� who resides at ✓ Q ��LL �% C� mailino address.4/Yl home phone # , ork phone # tfis claiming damages against ,� VO 5 in the sum of $_ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: __ q�o -TIME:`jf�/�E�/I/jJ--P/jj LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe occurrence explaining the nature of the defects or acts of negligence causing damages. MWAVIMRAM an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes >e No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (rnodei) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Packe�Page 140 of 333 1, D being first duly sworn,' Ae pose and say. that. I am the claimant for th e he above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the sarge to be true. X Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington B County of Snarn� I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 2)1- JV ' A%C e0AIr is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /O —5— O 7st!!l1p4� Signature Title —ems _ - 1 Gas My appointment expires 40AA. s ihha �rc� Packet Page 141 of 333 i.,i� l �- �, lam.' �r � � i.��I r ' \•-�-"�j i' i � } A �z t 7 _ � s s_j6�� t r '`iTK\ - '��, 'C-, I� kr /r v1 ter ��7\d 1!°p(\� hI.A� + � t � _ li� rl _�1\ ; ij�„ � �� i I i' `' ♦ - �� ,r I,, � r .� 4 �J il A }/ I PVA� de 4P� AM-1197 Shell Valley Emergency Access Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: Department: Review Committee: Action: Subject Title 10/16/2007 Dave Gebert Engineering Approved for Consent Agenda Information Time: Consent Type: Action Appropriation of additional $1,990 and authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Perteet, Inc. for the Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff 2.E. Council appropriate an additional $1,990 from Street Construction/Improvement Capital Projects Fund 112 cash balance and authorize the Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Perteet, Inc. for the Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision project. Previous Council Action On September 25, 2001, Council passed Resolution No. 1011 declaring the City owned property located at approximately 8612 Main Street as surplus to the City's needs and authorizing the Mayor and Staff to offer said property for sale. On April 17, 2007, Council adopted the 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which includes $50,000 in Fund 112 in 2007 for design of the Shell Valley Emergency Access project (instead of the $50,000 included in the adopted 2007 Capital Budget for ROW stabilization projects) and $340,000 in Fund 125 (REET2 Transportation Projects) in 2009 for construction of this project. On June 5, 2007, Council authorized Staff to proceed with selection of a consultant to design the Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision project using the funds included in the 2007 Fund 112 Capital Budget for right-of-way (ROW) stabilization projects. Narrative The Shell Valley area is accessed only by way of Pioneer Way, which is a very steep and curvy road. There are 90 dwelling units which utilize Pioneer Way as their access out to Bowdoin Way. During periods of ice and snow, Pioneer Way becomes impassable, forcing residents to park on Bowdoin Way and walk down the steep road. This also makes it hard for emergency responders to handle calls for assistance. Pioneer Way has continued over the years to be extended northward toward Main Street. There is now only one parcel of land that separates Pioneer Way from Main Street and it is owned by the City. Packet Page 144 of 333 This project will provide an alternate emergency access. The emergency access connection would be a gated, 15 feet wide paved access, with 5 feet total of gravel shoulder (for a total width of 20 feet) that would double as a pedestrianibicycle path. It could also serve as access to any future residential lots on the City property. The project also includes development of plans and documents for a short subdivision of the City owned property to the extent necessary for preliminary short plat approval to enable the City to sell the portions of the property not needed for the emergency access and trail, as authorized by Council Resolution No. 1011. On June 5, 2007, Council authorized Staff to proceed with selection of a consultant to design the Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision project using the funds ($50,000) included in the 2007 Fund 112 Capital Budget for right-of-way (ROW) stabilization projects. Following the City's established procedures, a selection panel consisting of the Development Services Director, Parks and Recreation Director, City Engineer and Transportation Engineer selected the consultant firm of Perteet, Inc. for this project. Staff and the consultant have agreed upon a scope of services and budget in the amount of $51,990, which requires appropriation of additional budget in the amount of $1,990 for this project. Sufficient funds are available in Fund 112. The proposed Professional Services Agreement is attached. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Professional Services Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 10/04/2007 12:15 PM APRV 2 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 10/04/2007 01:39 PM APRV 3 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 10/04/2007 02:15 PM APRV 4 City Clerk 5 Mayor 6 Final Approval Form Started By: Dave Gebert Final Approval Date: 10/08/2007 Sandy Chase 10/08/2007 09:29 AM APRV Gary Haakenson 10/08/2007 09:30 AM APRV Sandy Chase 10/08/2007 09:31 AM APRV Started On: 10/04/2007 11:15 AM Packet Page 145 of 333 I?c.I$g0 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Perteet, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting iirrn to provide design and other engineering and consulting services with respect to the Shell Valley Emergency -Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision project; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work, A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit B, provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of $51,990. B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the City Engineer three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle. C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. Packet Page 146 of 333 Incorporated August 11, 1890 ID C" . ' . .. �i T 1 • T 3. Owner "hi and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant and shall not be considered public records, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become public records. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and, subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of Performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Hold harmless a reement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant's negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW, G. General and lorofessional liabiii insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Packet Page 147 of 333 2 Insurance Coverage A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the State. B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an arnount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability .insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the City. The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin or physical handicap. S. Consultant is an inde endent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 9. Ci approval of work and relationships, Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written notification to the City and the City's prior written consent. 10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten days in advance of the effective date of said termination. Packet Page 148 of 333 3 11. TntMration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document and the Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Services. 14. Non —waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the contractor shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 17. Com fiance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. Packet Page 149 of 333 4 18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the Following address; Perteet, Inc. 2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 900 Everett, WA 98201 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSULTANT: By By Gary Haakenson, Mayor Its ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Packet Page 150 of 333 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, daily commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Page 151 of 333 6 Exhibit A SHELL VALLEY EMERGENCY ACCESS AND PRELIMINARY SHORT SUBDIVISION PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS AND PERTEET, INC. Packet Page 152 of 333 Exhibit A Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision Project Scope of Work INTRODUCTION The Shell Valley area of Edmonds is accessed only by way of Pioneer Way, which is a very steep and curvy road. There are 90 dwelling units which utilize Pioneer Way as their access out to Bowdoin Way, During periods of ice and snow, Pioneer Way becomes impassable, forcing residents to park on Bowdoin Way and walk down the steep road. This also makes it hard for emergency responders to handle calls for assistance. Pioneer Way has continued over the years to be extended northward toward Main Street. There is now only one parcel of land that separates Pioneer Way from Main Street and it is owned by the City. This project will provide an alternate emergency access. The emergency access connection will be a gated, 15-foot wide paved access, with 5-foot total gravel shoulder (for a total width of 20 feet) that would double as a pedestrian / bicycle path. It could also serve as access to any future residential lots on the City property. The scope of services for the Consultant will include review of available data (including the URS wetland delineation report dated January 3, 2002, previously prepared topographic and boundary surveys, and short plat concept sketches). The Consultant will prepare final design details, construction drawings, bid proposal form and cost estimate; and provide bidding assistance to advertise for construction bids and construction support services for construction of the Shell Valley Emergency Access project. The Consultant will also prepare plans and docurnents for a short subdivision of the City owned property to the extent necessary for preliminary short plat approval to enable the City to sell the portions of the property not needed for the emergency access and trail. PROJECT SCOPE PURPOSE The overall purpose of this scope of work is to have the Consultant support the City with project management, a preliminary short subdivision, a wetland delineation and critical area study, Shell Valley emergency access plans and estimate and bidding assistance. Task I — Project Management Task 2 — Preliminary Short Subdivision Task 3 -- Wetland Delineation and Critical Area Study Task 4 — Shell Valley Emergency Access Plans and Estimate Task 5 — Bidding Assistance It is understood and emphasized that the Consultant shall provide a supporting roll to the City of Edmonds in its efforts to work with the community, other agencies and the procurement of necessary project permits. Packet Page 153 of 333 PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE It is anticipated that the Final Design, Bidding and Construction Support Services for the Shell Valley Emergency Access and Preliminary Short Subdivision will have the following tentative schedule and will be completed by July 31, 2008, with proposed key dates as follows: Action : Cam letion Date: ® Award of Consultant contract October 2007 • Kickoff Meeting October 2007 • First Review set (plans) distributed December 2007 ® Second Review set (plans and specs) distributed February 2007 ® Final Bid documents completed, ready for May 2008 advertising for bids DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK BY TASK AND SUBTASKS Task 1 — Project Management As part of the project, the Consultant will prepare monthly progress reports that describe the work items or percentage of work items that were accomplished during a given month, as well as a forecast of work to be completed over the following month. The monthly progress reports will also identify any other issues or problems that may occur in any give month. The monthly reports will include an updated project schedule with a comparison to the baseline project. The Consultant will submit these monthly progress reports to the City Project Manager with the monthly invoices. The monthly invoices will bill by individual tasks. The Consultant will hold weekly project coordination meeting phone calls with City staff. It is intended that these coordination phone calls will be informal, with discussions held regarding the overall progress and scope of work, and of upcoming project issues. Hand written notes will be taken but not distributed. Resulting action items and team responsibilities will be sent out as an e-mail by the Consultant. Monthly project meetings will also be held. The location of these meeting will alternate between the City and Consultant. Deliverables: Kickoff Meeting ® Monthly Progress Reports / Consultant Invoices Packet Page 154 of 333 -3- Task..2 -W Prelim! ary Short Subdivision The intent of this task is to develop a preliminary short subdivision for Lot 1, Block 5 Plat of Alderwood Manor No. 9 for the City of Edmonds. The preliminary short subdivision will be developed in accordance with Chapter 20.75.060 - Required Information on Preliminary Plats of ECDC. Work Elements: Review code requirements • Meet with planning staff • Prepare vicinity map Prepare proposed parcel map • Prepare site features map that depicts existing conditions, proposed building pads, set backs, existing zoning and natural features such as wetlands, buffers and steep slopes • Prepare proposed grading plan Prepare site topographic map including utilities • Identification of steep slope areas under ECDC 23.80. Assumptions: • Perteet will not be required to perform field survey work or base mapping, except for the wetland delilneation. The City topographic survey provided to Perteet will adequately reflect existing field conditions and contour information required for preliminary plats. City will provide Perteet with an electronic copy of the base Wrap. • City will provide Perteet with an electronic copy of the Record of Survey. • The City will prepare the preliminary drainage proposal as specified in ECDC 18.30 in accordance with ECDC 2O.75.O60.P. • Legal descriptions will not be prepared at this time nor will a Record of Survey be prepared. • A geotecbnical investigation will not be performed. • A hazardous waste assessment will not be performed. Deliverables; • Vicinity Map • Proposed Parcel Map • Map depicting proposed building pads, setbacks, existing zoning and natural features such as wetlands and steep slopes • Proposed grading plan • Site topographic map including utilities Packet Page 155 of 333 q Task 3 — Wetland Delineation and Critical Area Stud The Consultant will prepare a wetland delineation and critical area study. Work will include a review of the URS Wetland Assessment prepared in 2002, field delineation, preparation of a wetland report, consistent with current site conditions and regulations. Work Elements: Review current critical area regulations, including ECDC 23.50. Review January 3, 2002 URS Wetland Assessment — 86`" Place and Main Street. • Field delineation of wetlands on the project site. • Prepare a critical area study in accordance with current City of Edmonds regulations. Assumptions. There are no other wetlands on -site than those identified by the URS Wetland Assessment. Since the extent of future wetland impacts are not known at this time, wetland mitigation plan is not included or budgeted for in this Scope of Services A Corps of Engineers 404 wetland fill permit application is not included or budgeted in this scope of services. Deliverables: • Wetland Delineation and Critical Area Study Task 4 — Shell Valle Einer enc Access Plans and Estimate The Consultant will prepare plans and Engineer's estimate for the Shell Vallcy Emergency Access Road. The design will be based upon the preliminary design drawings provided by the City. Specifications and other contract documents will not be produced by the Consultant for this project. The Consultant will attempt to select only standard bid items that do not require project specifications. Any required project specifications, contract boiler- plates and other necessary bidding documents will be prepared by the City of Edmonds. The Consultant will prepare the contract bid proposal forin and note which bid items are standard and which ones require a special provision. The plan sheets will be prepared at a scale of 1" = 20' plotted on 22" x 34" plan sheets. All submittals will be half-size sheets, or 11" x 17". Five copies will be transmitted with each submittal. At this time, approximately six (6) sheets are anticipated, based on the following sheet breakdown: • Cover Sheet and Vicinity Map - one (1) sheet • Legend and Abbreviations - one (1) sheet • Site Preparation and Erosion control - one (1) sheet • Plan and Profile - one (1) sheet • Roadway Section and Details - one (1) sheet • Drainage Details - one (1) sheet Packet Page 156 of 333 _5 - The Consultant will submit to the City design plans for review and comment at the 30% and 95% complete stages. The Consultant will prepare the project Engineer's opinion of cost based on review comments received from the City on the 95% complete plans and will submit the opinion of costs with the 100% plan set. Assumptions: The City will prepare and edit its desired contract boilerplates • The City will provide the Consultant with its desired bid proposal form • The City will assemble, print and distribute the final contract documents and any required addenda. • A Summary or Quantities plan sheet will not be developed for this project. ° We assume only simple wall systems will be employed on this project such as MSE or modular block walls for fill walls of six (6) feet in height or less, ecology block walls for cut wall of four (4) feet in height or less. Rockeries will not be used on this project. Taller walls or other wall systems will require a geotechnical investigation and the addition of a Structural Engineer to the design team. • Traffic Control Plans will not be required. • Landscaping Plans will not be required. • A conventional manual gate system or bollards will be selected to keep vehicles off the trail when the roadway is not being used for emergency access. • Where possible, City and WSDOT Standard Plans will be utilized and referenced in the Contract Manual. • The project Drainage Report will be prepared under Task 2, Deliverables: Design Criteria Memo and Matrix Draft submittals of half -sized plans made at 30% and 95% levels of design completion. The 30% submittal will only include the preliminary plans and profile sheets. Complete bid package for the project: o Final contract documents (half -sized), signed by a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Washington, reproducible. o All final plan drawings will also be provided in electronic form in a DWG format compatible with AutoCAD Version 2005 o Bid proposal form o Engineer's Opinion of Costs Packet Page 157 of 333 -6- Task S— Bidding Assistance The intent of this task is to provide the City of Edmonds with answers to questions and requests for information during the bidding phase. Work Elements: Respond to requests for information Prepare one (1) Addendum Review bid proposals Deliverables: • Written response to BFI's • Revised plan sheet for one (1) addendum City Provided Materials The City will provide the Consultant with the following services and materials: • City will be responsible for public involvement materials and presentations • City will prepare the SEPA Checklist • Provide the Consultant with an electronic copy of the site topographic base neap • Provide the Consultant with an electronic copy of the Record of Survey prepared by Reid Middleton Subconsultants The following subconsultants will be used to assist in accomplishment of the work: • None Services such as landscape design, structural engineering, land surveying and traffic analysis will not be provided by the Consultant, Packet Page 158 of 333 - 7 1 Ell \ ƒ ¥ \ ® § ( . J \*) vg § {ƒ){ § 2±J$ 2 Sr]$)» Packet Page 1597 333 AM-1198 Interlocal Agreement with the City of North Bend Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Steve Koho Time: Consent Department: Wastewater Treatment Plant Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Tnfnrm ntinn 2.F. Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign interlocal agreement with the City of North Bend for disposal of biosolids from their wastewater treatment plant. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement with the City of North Bend. Previous Council Action In April 1998, Council authorized an interlocal agreement for biosolids disposal with the City of North Bend. In December 2000, Council authorized a six -year term agreement for biosolids disposal with the City of North Bend. Narrative The City of North Bend has periodically disposed of biosolids from their wastewater treatment plant at the Edmonds treatment plant since 1999. The most recent agreement expired in December 2006 and needs to be renewed in order to provide short-term assistance for North Bend. The disposal fee covers the direct expense for handling and disposal, as well as an additional capital expense charge that is set aside for future equipment replacement. Link: N. Bend interlocal Route Seq Inbox 1 City Clerk 2 Mayor 3 Final Approval Form Started By: Steve Koho Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Approved By Date Status Sandy Chase 10/08/2007 09:29 AM APRV Gary Haakenson 10/08/2007 09:30 AM APRV Sandy Chase 10/08/2007 09:31 AM APRV Started On: 10/08/2007 09:19 AM Final Approval Date: 10/08/2007 Packet Page 160 of 333 Packet Page 161 of 333 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR DISPOSAL OF BIOSOLIDS BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CITY OF NORTH BEND THIS AGREEMENT, is made this day of , 2007, by and between the City of Edmonds (hereinafter "Edmonds"), and the City of North Bend (hereinafter "North Bend"); and WHEREAS, Edmonds has the facilities and expertise to treat and dispose of biosolid waste; and WHEREAS, the North Bend is in need of such facilities and expertise; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: TERMS 1. Description of Program. Edmonds agrees to handle the disposal and treatment of biosolids delivered by North Bend in accordance with the terms and conditions attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. The City of Edmonds, as operator of the plant, specifically reserves as set forth below the right to terminate this Agreement at any time and the City of Edmonds will terminate this Agreement, when, in its sole discretion, it determines that the disposal of solids hereunder would interfere with the smooth, efficient and cost effective operation of the secondary sewage treatment plant. 2. Payment. A. When charges are pending, Edmonds shall submit a monthly payment invoice to North Bend for services to date, and North Bend shall make payments within thirty (30) days after the submittal of the invoice. B. If North Bend objects to all or any portion of any invoice, it shall so notify Edmonds within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt and shall pay the portion of the invoice not in dispute. The parties shall immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. If they are unable to resolve their dispute, the parties agree to use an alternative dispute resolution procedure to resolve their differences. C. The prices to be paid are set forth in the attached Exhibit A which has been incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. The charge for disposal of biosolids set forth in such Exhibit may be amended by the provision of thirty (30) days prior written notice from Edmonds to North Bend. Upon receipt of such notice, North Bend may terminate this agreement or, by continuing to ship biosolids for disposal, agree to the amendment of this agreement to incorporate such new and higher charge. In such event, Exhibit A shall be deemed amended to incorporate such new charge. -1- Packet Page 162 of 333 3. Duration. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution and shall remain in effect for an initial term until December 31, 2009. Unless terminated as provided below, the Agreement may continue in effect at the mutual agreement of the parties for up to two additional two-year terms to expire December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2013. 4. Termination. Either party may terminate this contract at any time upon sixty (60) days written notice. Edmonds reserves the right to refuse or suspend any biosolid delivery from North Bend at any time and for any length of time in accordance with plant operational needs. Paragraphs 2 and 5 shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. Each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, and those of its officers, agents or employees, while performing work pursuant to this Agreement, to the fullest extent required by law, and agrees to save, indemnify, defend, and hold the other party harmless from any such liability. In the case of negligence of multiple parties, any damages allowed shall be assessed in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each party, and each party shall have the right to seek contribution from the other party in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to the other party. 6. Miscellaneous Disclosures as Required by RCW 39.34.030. No separate legal entity shall be created by this Agreement, and each party hereto shall be responsible for its own budgeting of funds transferred under this Agreement. No property shall transfer ownership or be jointly owned as a result of this Agreement. Edmonds shall serve as the administrator of this Agreement. 7. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with all Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the parties, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of, or altering in any manner whatsoever, this Agreement. 8 Modification. No waiver, alteration or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of Edmonds and North Bend. 9. Waiver. Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach. 10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Any suit brought by either party -2- Packet Page 163 of 333 arising out of this Agreement shall only be maintained in a court of competent jurisdiction in Snohomish County, Washington. 11. Filing. This Agreement shall be filed with the Snohomish County Auditor as required by RCW 39.34.040. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above written. CITY OF EDMONDS IN ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: SANDRA S. CHASE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: W. SCOTT SNYDER, City Attorney Mayor Gary Haakenson CITY OF NORTH BEND IN ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney -3- Packet Page 164 of 333 EXHIBIT A The City of Edmonds agrees to assist North Bend with its biosolids disposal needs. Our approval is based upon the following conditions: • Shipments will be received at a time agreed to by both agencies at least 24 hours in advance. • The delivery route to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) will be from SR 104 west, right on Dayton Street, right on Second Avenue South. • North Bend will be charged $0.25 per dry pound. • Test results performed at Edmonds WWTP will be used for billing. The method for calculating the quantity received will be as follows: North Bend will split a sample taken during each tanker loading destined for the Edmonds WWTP. The biosolids hauler will deliver a sample to the Edmonds WWTP for solids concentration analysis. Quantity of liquid biosolids received will be measured using the flowmeter at the plant. Edmonds WWTP personnel will log all deliveries and pounds received each day. • Edmonds WWTP will be responsible for unloading deliveries. If the solids concentration generated from North Bend changes significantly, Edmonds WWTP will be notified in advance. • The City of Edmonds reserves the right to refuse deliveries consistently under 2% solids if plant storage tank capacity is threatened. M Packet Page 165 of 333 AM-1199 Council Acceptance of Capital Project Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Steve Koho Time: Consent Department: Wastewater Treatment Plant Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Tnfnrm n+inn 2.G. Subiect Title Report on final construction costs for the Clarifier Repair Project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Staff recommends that Council accept project. Previous Council Action On June 26, 2007, Council awarded a construction contract to Cascade Industries NW, Inc. Narrative The Clarifier Repair project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant is complete. The project was designed, inspected and accepted by staff. Project Budget $178,000 Costs: Contractor $78,146.64 Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 08:37 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/11/2007 08:47 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 08:57 AM APRV Form Started By: Steve Started On: 10/08/2007 03:32 Koho PM Final Approval Date: 10/11/2007 Packet Page 166 of 333 AM-1202 Fees for Photocopying and Transcription of Public Records Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase Time: Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Review Committee: Finance Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Consent Action 2.H. Subject Title Proposed Resolution repealing Resolution No. 1051 and enacting new charges and fees for the photocopying and transcription of public records. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. Previous Council Action On December 2, 2003 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1051, repealing Resolution No. 851 and enacting new charges and fees for the photocopying and transcription of public records. On October 9, 2007, the Finance Committee reviewed the attached Resolution and recommended placing it on the City Council Consent Agenda for approval. Narrative Edmonds City Code Section 1.20.040(A) requires the City Clerk to set fees and charges for the provision of photocopies and transcription of public records. The attached resolution updates the previously adopted resolution which was approved December 2, 2003. RCW 42.56.120 permits agencies such as cities to impose a reasonable charge for providing photocopies of public records so long as the charge shall not exceed Fifteen Cents per page. If it is determined that staff salaries, benefits, or overhead charges would cause the per copy charge to be higher than Fifteen Cents per page, a statement detailing the actual cost will be prepared. The statement will include the factors and manner used to determine the actual per page copying cost or other allowable costs. Each department has reviewed and recommended the charges and fees that are included in the resolution. In addition, the City Attorney's Office has reviewed the charges and fees for compliance with RCW requirements. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Resolution Link: Exhibit 2 - Fee Schedule Packet Page 167 of 333 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/10/2007 11:03 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/10/2007 11:12 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/10/2007 11:29 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Started On: 10/10/2007 10:53 Chase AM Final Approval Date: 10/10/2007 Packet Page 168 of 333 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1051 AND ENACTING NEW CHARGES AND FEES FOR THE PHOTOCOPYING AND TRANSCRIPTION OF PUBLIC RECORDS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has adopted an ordinance which requires the City Clerk to set fees and charges for the provision of photocopies and transcriptions of public records, and, WHEREAS RCW 42.56.120 permits agencies such as cities to impose a reasonable charge for providing photocopies of public records so long as the charge shall not exceed Fifteen Cents ($0.15) per page, and, WHEREAS, the City Clerk has prepared a schedule of fees that relates to photocopying costs, reproduction costs, and transcription costs to the fees charged to the public, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Resolution No. 1051 and the fee schedule adopted thereby, is repealed and in its place enacted the schedule of fees set forth in Section 2. Section 2. The "public records fee schedule," attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth, is hereby adopted as the official schedule of fees and charges for photocopying and transcription cost of public records for the City of Edmonds. -I- Packet Page 169 of 333 RESOLVED this day of , 2007. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED: MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON -2- Packet Page 170 of 333 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC RECORDS FEE SCHEDULE Updates to this fee schedule will be made as new documents become available. Any records not identified in this index will be charged on a cost basis. Document Description Department Fee Copies, standard or legal size All Departments 150 per page (first 5 pages free) Business License List City Clerk $5.00 per report Certification Charge (Blanket) City Clerk $5.00/blanket Certification Charge City Clerk $5.00 per page Transcriptions City Clerk $25.00 minimum per hour labor Citizen/Immigration Letters Mayor No charge Cemetery Deeds Parks & Recreation 1 free copy Land Use Files Land Use Files Relating to Subdivisions, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, etc. Planning Cost per copy (See Note 2) Code Books Community Development Code Book Code Publishing Co. $80.00 plus tax (includes shipping) City Code Book Code Publishing Co. $80.00 plus tax (includes shipping) Updates for Code Books Code Publishing Co. 100 per page (includes shipping) Comprehensive Plans City Comprehensive Plan Planning See Notes 1 and 2 Comprehensive Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan Parks & Recreation See Notes 1 and 2 -1- Packet Page 171 of 333 Pine Ridge Park Master Plan Parks & Recreation See Notes 1 and 2 Bikeway/Walkway Plan Engineering See Notes 1 and 2 Water, Sewer, Stormwater or Transportation Comprehensive Plan Engineering See Notes 1 and 2 Stormwater Basin studies Engineering See Notes 1 and 2 Maps Aerial Engineering $5.00 per sheet Aerial Base Map Including Overlays Engineering $5.00 per sheet Aerial, Reproducible (Mylar) Engineering $5.00 per sheet Land Use Map Planning $5.00 per sheet Miscellaneous Maps (includes plat maps, as -built prints and quarter section maps) Planning & Engineering $5.00 per sheet Customized Electronic Maps Planning See Note 3 Reports, Misc. Traffic collision reports or Investigation reports Police $3.00 per report up to 10 pages. 150 for each additional page. Incident Reports Fire $10.00 per report up to 10 pages. 150 for each additional page. Incident Photographs and CDs Fire Reimburse actual cost Photographs (4" x 6" Size) Police $1.00 per print Photographs (Larger Size) Police Reimburse actual cost Fingerprint Cards Police $5.00 each Budget & Financial Reports Annual Budget Book Admin. Services $15.00 -2- Packet Page 172 of 333 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Admin. Services $10.00 Audio/Video Recordings Public Meeting Audio Tape Recordings City Clerk $10.00 for audio duplication, per hour minimum of equipment use, plus materials Municipal Court Proceedings Audio Tape Municipal Court $10.00 for audio Recordings duplication, per hour minimum of equipment use, plus materials City Council Meetings Video Tape Council Office $10.00 for video Recordings duplication per hour minimum of equipment use, plus materials NOTES: Note 1: Documents are available for review. Copies may be obtained at the per page cost. Note 2: If it is determined that staff salaries, benefits, or overhead charges would cause the per copy charge to be higher than 15¢ per page, a statement detailing the actual cost will be prepared. The statement will include the factors and manner used to determine the actual per page copying cost or other allowable costs (per RCW 42.56.120). Note 3: The city may provide customized electronic maps in response to a request and charge a fee for the customization. -3- Packet Page 173 of 333 AM-1207 Denim Day proclamation Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: Submitted For: Department: Review Committee: 10/16/2007 Linda Carl Gary Haakenson Mayor's Office Time: Consent Type: Information Action: Information Subject Title Proclamation in honor of Denim Day in Edmonds, October 17, 2007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative 2.I. Domestic violence continues to be a serious issue that crosses all economic, racial, and socioeconomic segments of our society. This year, Mayor Haakenson, along with Snohomish County Executive Reardon, have declared October 17 as "Denim Day" in Edmonds and in the county to bring attention to the serious issue of sexual violence. Denim Day was established after the Italian Supreme Court dismissed charges against a 45-year-old rape suspect because his 18-year-old victim was wearing jeans at the time of the attack, and the Court believed it was impossible to remove jeans without the woman's help or consent. This sparked a worldwide outcry that led to the creation of Denim Day. On Wednesday, October 17, the Center for Battered Women in Snohomish County will host the "Hope Within Luncheon" at the Everett Events Center. More information can be found at www.snococ www.snococbw.or. The luncheon is free, and attendees are asked to wear denim in honor of domestic violence month and Denim Day. Fiscal Impact Attnrhmontc Link: Proclamation Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 10:34 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/12/2007 10:37 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 10:41 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Started On: 10/12/2007 10:30 Carl AM Final Approval Date: 10/12/2007 Packet Page 174 of 333 Packet Page 175 of 333 riartamattian City of Edmonds • Office of the Mayor DenimDay October 17, 2007 WHEREAS, October is Domestic Violence Awarenss Month, and the lives of women, men, children, extended families, and communities continue to be negatively and often severely impacted by domestic violence; and WHEREAS, domestic violence is a pattern of physical, emotional, verbal, and sexual abuse that includes, but is not limited to, threats, intimidation, isolation, and/or financial control. Domestic violence is an intentional pattern of behavior that is used by one person as a means to harm and control another person in the context of a dating, family, roommate, or caretaker relationship; and WHEREAS, domestic violence and sexual violence are epidemics affecting all communities regardless of age, socioeconomic status, educational background, race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, ability, sexual orientation, or gender; and WHEREAS, sexual assault is an intolerable violent crime with public health implications for every person in Snohomish County as a victim/survivor or as a family member, significant other, neighbor or .co-worker of a victim/survivor; and WHEREAS, "Denim Day" was established after the Italian Supreme Court dismissed charges against a rape suspect because his victim was wearing jeans at the time of the attack. The judgment sparked a worldwide outcry, and Denim Day has become a day symbolizing international injustice for sexual assault. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Cary Haakenson, Mayor, do hereby proclaim October 17, 2007 as Denim Day in Edmonds, and encourage all resident to take a stand against domestic violence in their personal relationships and in our community, and I urge all residents to work toward eliminating domestic and sexual violence in our community. f) Gary H#ato son, Mayor October 1107 Packet Page 176 of 333 AM-1208 2.J. Paramedic Training Affiliation Agreement Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Mark Correira Time: Consent Department: Fire Type: Action Review Committee: Public Safety Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subiect Title Paramedic Training Affiliation Agreement. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The Edmonds Fire Department respectfully requests the document be added to the October 16 Consent Agenda for approval and authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement. Previous Council Action The Public Safety Committee met on October 9 and approved this agreement to be added to the Consent Agenda for approval. Narrative BACKGROUND Paramedic Training is an intensive education and training program that requires students to attend not less than 1,200 hours of instruction in both the out -of -hospital and in -hospital setting. Students are required to spend long hours in the classroom, emergency room, operating room, intensive care unit, pediatric and obstetrics unit, and psychiatric unit. Time spent in these units is overseen by an experienced medical professional guiding their education very similar to that of a resident physician. After completeing the laborious training and education, the students take a final exam proctored by the State of Washington and, if successful, are certified to operate as a paramedic under a guiding physician. The final paramedic test is reported to be one of the most difficult medical profession certifications to pass because of the programs depth and breadth of medical knowledge requirement, and the limited time of education necessary to complete the program. The Edmonds Fire Department currently sends it Firefighters to the University of Washington's Paramedic Training Program at Harborview Medical Center. In 2003, the Department trained its first Firefighter and, to date, has trained a total of three members. Training Class 34 begins October 3, 2007 and the Fire Department has two members attending. AFFILIATION AGREEMENT To attend paramedic training at Harborview, the Edmonds Fire Department is required to enter into an affiliation agreement prepared by the State Attorney General's Office with the University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center. Before each year's program begins, the University sends out an updated version of the agreement requesting updated signatures. This agreement has been Packet Page 177 of 333 signed in years past by the City Attorney and the Fire Chief with the most recent agreement being signed on March 31, 2005. This newly updated Affiliation Agreement has been vetted and approved as written by City Attorney Scott Snyder. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Paramedic Training Affiliation Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 12:55 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/12/2007 01:15 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 01:20 PM APRV Form Started By: Mark Started On: 10/12/2007 11:50 Correira AM Final Approval Date: 10/12/2007 Packet Page 178 of 333 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON/HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER AFFILIATION AGREEMENT WITH . Edmonds Fire Department This Agreement is made and entered into between Edmonds Fire Department ("Agency") and the University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center, located at Seattle, Washington ("Training Site"). The purpose of this Agreement is for the Training Site to provide paramedic training/certification for the Agency's employees. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, Agency and Training Site agree as follows: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Agency and Training Site agree that contemporaneous with or following execution of this Agreement and within the scope of its provisions, Agency may develop letter agreements with Training Site to formalize operational details of the educational program. These details include, but are not limited to the following: • Beginning dates and length of experience (to be mutually agreed upon at least one month before the beginning of the educational program); • Number of students eligible to participate in the educational program; • Specific days, hours and locations for the educational program; • Specific learning objectives and performance expectations for students; • Specific allocation of responsibilities for the faculty liaison, educational supervisor, and preceptors, if any, identified elsewhere in this Agreement; 2. Any such letter agreements will be considered to be attachments to this Agreement, will be binding when signed by authorized representatives of each party, and may be modified by subsequent letter agreements signed by authorized representatives of each party. 3. Agency and Training Site will require its respective faculty, staff, and students participating in the educational program, to maintain confidentiality of student and patient information as required by law and by the policies and procedures of Agency and Training Site. 4. There will be no payment of charges or fees between Agency and Training Site. Agency and Training Site acknowledge the Medic One Foundation gifts funding for the training costs under this agreement. If funds become unavailable, this agreement will be subject to the termination clause in section 32. 5. There will be no discrimination against any program participant or applicant covered under this Agreement because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, handicap, status as Confidential Page 1 2007-09-12 PAffildgcts & ContractslAffiliation Agreomenis\Affilation Agrccment Master 2007.doc Packet Page 179 of 333 a Vietnam era or disabled veteran, gender, or sexual orientation, nor will Agency or Training Site engage in such discrimination in their employment or personnel policies. AGENCY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 6. Agency will provide feedback to the Training Site concerning the curriculum and the professional and academic credentials of its faculty for the students at Training Site. Agency will designate an appropriately qualified and credentialed employee to coordinate and act as the Liaison with Training Site. Agency will notify Training Site in writing of any change or proposed change of its Liaison. 7. Agency's liaison will meet with the Training Site educational Supervisor(s) and Preceptor(s), if any, at the beginning and end of the educational program to discuss and evaluate the educational program. These meetings will take place in person if practicable, otherwise by telephone conference. 8. Agency will provide the names and information pertaining to relevant education and training for all students enrolled in the educational program at least six weeks before the beginning date of the educational program. Agency is responsible for supplying any additional information required by Training Site as set forth in this Agreement, prior to the arrival of students. Agency will immediately notify Training Site in writing of any change or proposed change in a student's status. 9. Agency will obtain evidence of current immunizations against diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, measles (rubeola), mumps, rubella (or a positive rubella titer), and of hepatitis B immunity status, documented by a protective titer, for those students who will be in contact with patients/clients. For each student born after 1956, Agency will maintain on file records of positive titer or of post-1967 immunization for rubella and rubeola. At the time of immunization, students with no history of exposure to chicken pox will be advised to get an immune titer. Agency will require yearly purified protein derivative (PPD) testing, or follow- up as recommended if the students are PPD-positive, or have had Bacillus of Calmette & Guerin (BCG). Agency will provide information to Training Site regarding student status concerning the above requirements prior to enrollment at Training Site. 10. Agency will assign to Training Site only those employee's who have current Washington State EMT-B status (through June 30 of the following year), HIPAA training, and meet all the entrance requirement of the Training Site. 11. Agency agrees to request a "Child and Adult Abuse Law" criminal background check ("CAAL check") pursuant to RCW 43.43.830-.842, or pursuant to its own state laws. Agency agrees to provide Training Site with a copy of the check results pertaining to each student considered for placement at Training Site. Agency acknowledges that placement of each student at the Training Site is contingent upon provision of check information dated less than two years prior to the commencement of the educational placement. Training Site acknowledges that Agency is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided Confidential idential Page 2 2007-09-12 PABudgcts & Contraets\Affiliation Agrccmcnts\Aff➢lation Agr'ecmcni Master' 2007.doc Packet Page 180 of 333 through this CAAL check and that Agency's provision of this CAAL check information does not relieve Training Site of any of its legal obligations related to these background checks. Training Site understands and agrees that any information forwarded to it by Agency has been procured through this process. Agency does not certify the veracity of the records provided and, furthermore, the obligation to conduct appropriate background checks and the Iiability for non-compliance therewith remains the responsibility of Training Site. 12. Agency will be responsible for each employee's Labor and Industry Workman's Compensation paperwork (while on duty at the Training Site) and health insurance coverage during his or her participation in the education program. 13. Agency will comply with and ensure to the extent possible that students comply with the policies and procedures established by Training Site. Agency will notify each student of his or her status and responsibilities pursuant to this Agreement. TRAINING SITE'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14, Training Site will plan the educational program and evaluate student progress. Exchange of information will be maintained by on -site visits and by letter or telephone. 15. Training Site will provide a desirable educational experience to students within the scope of health care services provided by Training Site. Training Site will designate preceptors, if necessary, to be responsible for the educational program, and will designate one person as the Educational Supervisor, who will maintain contact with the Agency -designated Liaison to assure mutual participation in and review of the educational program and student progress. Training Site will submit to Agency the professional and academic credentials for the preceptors and Educational Supervisor. Training Site will notify Agency of any change or proposed change of the preceptors or Educational Supervisor. 16, Training Site will provide student access to sources of information necessary for the education program, within Training Site's policies and procedures and commensurate with patients' rights, including library resources and reference materials. 17. Training Site will make available to students basic supplies and equipment necessary for care of patients/clients and the educational program. Within the limitation of facilities, Training Site will make available office and conference space for students and, if applicable, Agency faculty. 18. Training Site will maintain records and reports on each student's performance and status. 19. Training Site retains full responsibility for the care of patients/clients, and will maintain the quality of patient care without relying on the students' clinical training activities for staffing purposes. Confidential Page 3 2007-09-12 PABudgels & Contracts\Affiliation Agreements\Affilation Agreement Master 2007.doe Packet Page 181 of 333 20. Training Site has the right to take immediate temporary action to correct a situation whereby a student's actions endanger patient care. As soon as possible thereafter, Training Site's educational Supervisor will notify Agency of the action taken. All final resolutions of the student's academic status in such situations will be made solely by Agency after reviewing the matter and considering whatever written factual information Training Site provides for Agency; however, Training Site reserves the right to terminate the use of its facilities by a particular student when necessary to maintain its operation free of disruption and to ensure quality of patient care. 21. On any day when a student is participating in the educational program at its facilities, Training Site will provide to such student necessary emergency health care or first aid for accidents occurring in its facilities. The student will be responsible for the costs of all care. 22. Except as provided in this Agreement, Training Site will have no obligation to furnish medical or surgical care to any student. STUDENTS' STATUS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 23. Students will have the status of learners and will not replace Training Site personnel. Any service rendered by students is incidental to the purpose of the educational program. 24. Students are required to adhere to and maintain the educational standards/requirements, policies, and regulations of Training Site during their educational program. 25. Students will wear appropriate attire and name tags, and will conform to the standards and practices established by Agency during their educational program at Training Site. 26. Students assigned to Training Site will be and will remain employees of Agency, and will in no sense be considered employees of Training Site, Training Site does not and will not assume any liability under any law relating to Worker's Compensation on account of any Agency student's performing, receiving training, or traveling pursuant to this Agreement. Students will not be entitled to any monetary or other remuneration for services performed by them at Training Site, nor will Training Site otherwise have any monetary obligation to Agency or its students by virtue of this Agreement. LIABILITY COVERAGE PROVISIONS 27. Each party to this agreement will be responsible for the negligent acts or omissions of its own employees, officers, trainees, agents, or students in the performance of this Agreement. Neither party will be considered the agent of the other and neither party assumes any responsibility to the other party for the consequences of any act or omission of any person, firm, or corporation not a party to this Agreement, other than students as provided in this section and sections 28 and 29. Confidenti,}i Ptige 4 2007-09_ 12 IIABudgets & Contracts\Afftliadon Agreements\AffiIation Agreement Master 2007.doc Packet Page 182 of 333 28. Agency will defend, indemnify and hold Training Site harmless from any loss, claim or damage arising from the negligent acts and omissions of its employees, officers, agents, and students, including negligence connected with performing its obligations under this Agreement, including the independent negligence of students, and will maintain professional liability coverage with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate (or an equivalent program of self-insurance). 29. Training Site will defend, indemnify and hold Agency harmless from any loss, claim or damage arising from the negligent acts and omissions of its employees, officers, and agents, including the negligent supervision of students. Agency maintains a professional liability coverage program under the authority of RCW 2813.20.250, .253, and .255. Through that authority, Agency provides professional liability coverage for its employees, officers, and agents in the performance of this Agreement. 30. Both parties will provide proof of coverage upon execution of this Agreement. In addition, Agency and Training Site agree to notify each other in the case of material modification or cancellation of coverage, and to provide subsequent proof of coverage thereafter. TERM 31. This Agreement is effective beginning October 1, 2007, and will continue thereafter from year to year. This agreement will be reviewed no Iater than three years from its effective date, or earlier at the request of either party. Agency and Training Site will jointly plan student placement six weeks in advance of each year's beginning, taking into account the maximum number of students for whom Training Site can provide a desirable educational experience, and the needs of other Agencys requesting placements. 32. This agreement may be canceled by written notice one year prior to termination; however, such termination shall not become effective for the students then enrolled in the educational program if such termination prevents completion of their requirements for completion of the educational program. PROVISIONS REGARDING BLOOD -BORNE PATHOGENS 33. Agency certifies that it has trained each student it sends to Training Site in universal precautions and transmission of blood -borne pathogens, and that it will send to Training Site only students who have been trained in and have practiced using universal precautions. Agency has provided the opportunity to receive Hepatitis B (HBV) series(as per RCW 70.24) to all educational program students before assignment to Training Site. Training Site will provide personal protection equipment that is appropriate for the tasks assigned to Agency's students. Confidential Page 5 2007-09-12 P:\Budgets & Contracts\AfFliation AgreemcntsWfilation Agreement Master 2007.doe Packet Page 183 of 333 34. If a student sustains a needle -stick injury or other substantial exposure to bodily fluids of another or other potentially infectious material while participating in the educational program at Training Site, Training Site agrees to provide the following services: • Being seen by Training Site's employee health service and/or emergency department as soon as possible after the injury; • Initiation of HBV, Hepatitis C (HCV) and HIV protocol; • HIV counseling and appropriate testing. The student will be responsible for the costs of any such care, testing, counseling and obtaining any necessary follow-up care. 35. The source patient's HBV, HCV, and HIV status will be determined by Training Site in the usual manner to the extent possible. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 36. Entire A reg ement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes all prior oral or written agreements, commitments, or understandings concerning the matters provided for herein. 37. Amendment. This Agreement may be modified only by a subsequent written Agreement executed by the parties 38. Order of Precedence. Any conflict or inconsistency in this Agreement and its attachments will be resolved by giving the documents precedence in the following order: 1. This Agreement; 2. Attachments to this Agreement in reverse chronological order. 39. Governing Law. The parties' rights or obligations under this Agreement will be construed in accordance with, and any claim or dispute relating thereto will be governed by, the laws of the State of Washington. 40. Notices. All notices, demands, requests, or other communications required to be given or sent by Agency or Training Site, will be in writing and will be mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, or transmitted by hand delivery or facsimile, addressed as follows: (a) To Agency: Confidential Page G 2007-09-12 11ABudgets & Contracts\Affiliation Agreemenls\Aftlation Agreement Master 2007.doc Packet Page 184 of 333 (b) To Training: Roy Waugh, Paramedic Training 325 9"' Avenue Box 359727 SeatttIe WA 98104 206-521-1224 rwaugh@u.washingtoii.edu 41. Each party may designate a change of address by notice in writing. All notices, demands, requests, or communications that are not hand -delivered will be deemed received three days after deposit in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid; or upon confirmation of successful facsimile transmission. 42. Survival. Agency and Training Site expressly intend and agree that the Iiability coverage provisions of this Agreement will survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason. 43. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement, or of any other agreement, document, or writing pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement, is held to be wholly or partially invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, that provision will be ineffective to that extent only, without affecting in any way the remaining parts or provisions of the agreement. 44. Waiver. Neither the waiver by any of the parties hereto of a breach of or a default under any of the provisions of this Agreement, nor the failure of either of the parties, on one or more occasions, to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or to exercise any right or privilege hereunder, will thereafter be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of a similar nature, or as a waiver of any of such provisions, rights or privileges hereunder. 45. inspection. Training Site will permit, on reasonable notice and request, the inspection of clinical and related facilities by agencies charged with responsibility for accreditation of Agency. 46. HIPAA. Agency will direct its trainees to comply with the policies and procedures of Training Site, including those governing the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information under federal law, specifically 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. Solely for the purpose of defining the trainees' role in relation to the use and disclosure of Training Site's protected health information, the trainees are defined as members of the Training Site's workforce, as that term is defined by 45 CFR 160.103, when engaged in activities pursuant to this Agreement. However, the trainees are not and shall not be considered to be employees of the Training Site. Confidential Page 7 2007-09-12 P:TUdgets & ContractMffilialion AgrccmcntslAffiletion Agreement Master 2007.doc Packet Page 185 of 333 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON/HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER Date iC J Michael K. Copass, MD Professor of Medicine/Neurology Director, Paramedic Training Program Director of Emergency Services Harborview Medical Center Date By Johnese Spisso, Interim Executive Director Harborview Medical Center Approved as to form: By Assistant Attorney General for UW Date Edmonds Fire Department (Name) (Title) (Name) ('title) (rue) Approved as to form: (Name) Attorney for Agency Confidential Page 8 2007-09-12 P:113u1gcts & ContractstAffiliation Agrccmcn0Affi1a1ion Agreement Master 2007.doc Packet Page 186 of 333 AM-1209 2.K. Professional Services Agreement - Fire Department Medical Program Director Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Mark Correira Time: Consent Department: Fire Type: Action Review Committee: Public Safety Action: Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Professional Services Agreement - Fire Department Medical Program Director Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The Edmonds Fire Department respectfully requests the Council approve the agreement on the Consent Agenda as written, with authorization of the Mayor to sign the agreement. Previous Council Action Authorization to post a Request for Qualifications process was approved by the Public Safety Committee on May 1, 2007 and the City Council on May 8, 2007. Also, the Public Safety Committee approved the agreement for consent agenda requesting authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement at their October 9 meeting. Narrative The Edmonds Fire Department has a Professional Services Agreement signed with a physician to provide oversight of the Department's EMS Program. Dr. James Mercer has provided EMS oversight for the past eight years and recently tendered his resignation. Authorization to post a Request for qualifications process was approved by the Public Safety Committee on May 1, 2007 and the City Council on May 8, 2007, and was posted in accordance with City policies. The Fire Department received one (1) qualified applicant. A Professional Services Agreement for these duties was vetted by City Attorney Scott Snyder and has been approved by Dr. Richard Campbell. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: EFD MPD Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 12:55 PM APRV Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/12/2007 01:15 PM APRV Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 01:20 PM APRV Packet Page 187 of 333 Form Started By: Mark Started On: 10/12/2007 12:02 Correira PM Final Approval Date: 10/12/2007 Packet Page 188 of 333 AGREEMENT FOR SUPERVISORY SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND RICHARD J. CAMPBELL, M.D. This Agreement for Supervisory Services is hereby entered into this day of , 2007 by and between the City of Edmonds, Washington, (hereinafter "Edmonds") and Richard J. Campbell, M.D., (hereinafter the "Contractor"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Edmonds and the City of Lynnwood jointly undertook certain activities necessary to provide a fire -based advanced life support medical service; and WHEREAS, Edmonds and Lynnwood engaged the Contractor to render services in the area of training, supervision and advice in connection with the provision of emergency medical services in order to ensure the highest possible quality of paramedic and related emergency medical services; and WHEREAS, the exorbitant cost of medical malpractice insurance undermined the purpose and value of the prior Agreement; and WHEREAS, following consultation with its insurance pool, the Washington Cities Insurance Authority, Edmonds believes the value of the program offsets the low risk of indemnifying the Contractor from the risks of administering the duties of the Agreement in accordance with the limitations set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is a highly qualified medical professional willing and able to timely perform the services desired by Edmonds under the conditions set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived and the promises contained herein the parties agree as follows: TERMS Section 1. Scope of Services. The Contractor's title shall be Medical Program Director. The Contractor shall: 1.1 Report to the Edmonds Fire Chief or his designee. 1.2 Meet with the Fire Chief or his designee at least monthly to provide program, performance and system feedback regarding Edmonds' provision of emergency medical services. 1.3 Provide direct oversight to the out -of -hospital care provided by the paramedics for a time not less than four (4) hours per quarter. This would be performed a format mutually agreed upon by Edmonds and the Contractor. {WSS600489.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 1 Packet Page 189 of 333 1.4 Review emergency medical calls and recommend to the Fire Chief improvements regarding Edmonds' emergency medical services system. 1.5 Consult on the EFD Infection Control Program and Bloodborne Pathogen Plan and recommend appropriate changes as needed. 1.6 Supervise and review results of paramedic training, and approve certification and recertification in accordance with WAC 248-15-080 and approved standard operating procedures. 1.7 Evaluate paramedic performance and recommend to the Fire Chief any necessary formal disciplinary or corrective action, including restraining, disciplinary measures, and termination, and -- at the request of the Fire Chief and/or the Medical Service Administrator -- provide input in the hiring process. 1.8 Direct, on the radio and/or using other communications devices, paramedic activities related to patient care at the scene of medical emergencies when on duty. In the Contractor's absence, the Contractor's designee (the "replacement") will direct on the radio and/or using other communications devices, paramedic activities related to patient care at the scene of medical emergencies. No additional compensation shall be provided for services performed by the replacement in the Contractor's absence. 1.9 Perform duties in accordance with Chapter 248-15 WAC. 1.10 Exercise final authority over paramedics and other agents of Edmonds while performing emergency medical services, and may suspend a paramedic from providing medical treatment under the Contractor's license. PROVIDED, that nothing in this Agreement shall limit or diminish the ultimate administrative authority of the Fire Chief. Section 2. Delegation of Duties. Whenever the Contractor is absent from the area for a period longer than four weeks and/or is unavailable to perform the duties and responsibilities of this Agreement, the Contractor shall formally appoint a qualified replacement to assume and perform the contractual duties and responsibilities during the absence. The Contractor shall advise the Fire Chief and the Medical Services Administrator or his designee, of the replacement's name and qualifications prior to commencement of the Contractor's unavailable status. All replacements shall be subject to the Fire Chief s or his designee's approval, and shall agree in writing to abide by all provisions of this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be provided for services performed by the replacement in the Contractor's absence. Section 3. Time of Performance; Termination. This Agreement shall become effective for two (2) full years and two (2) months commencing on November 1, 2007, unless earlier terminated by either the Contractor or by Edmonds giving the other a minimum of ninety (90) days advance written notice of intention to terminate from the date specified for termination in the written notice. {WSS600489.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 2 Packet Page 190 of 333 Section 4. Compensation. Edmonds shall pay the Contractor One Thousand seven Hundred and twenty-five Dollars and no Cents ($1,725.00) per month (for a total of $20,700.00 annually) to perform the services specified herein. Section 5. Legal Liability and Indemnification. In performing work under this Agreement, it is the understanding and intent of the parties that the designated duties of reporting, supervising, evaluating and training listed in this Agreement along with the direction of emergency medical services does not constitute the practice of medicine. Accordingly, the parties provide for their respective liability as follows: 5.1 Indemnification of Contractor While Within the Scope of This Agreement. While the Contractor is performing duties within the scope of the relationship created by this Agreement, Edmonds agrees to treat the Contractor as a public official and indemnify him in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2.06 Indemnification of Employees and Officers, Edmonds City Code, in all respects as though the Contractor is a "official" of the city while performing the duties specified by this Agreement. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as a promise to indemnify the Contractor for any duties, particularly medical services and treatment, which the Contractor performs as a physician outside of the scope of this Agreement. 5.2 The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Edmonds, its respective officers, agents and employees from the Contractor's negligent, wrongful, criminal or tortious actions arising from, during or out of the performance of the duties under this Agreement and with respect to any and all injury or damage to Edmonds, or its respective properties, and also from and against all claims, demands and causes of action of every kind or nature arising directly or indirectly, or in any way incident to, in connection with, or out of the work performed under the terms of this Agreement, by the Contractor, his or her agents, employees, representatives or sub -contractors. The Contractor specifically promises to indemnify Edmonds against claims or suits brought under Title 51 RCW by his or her employees or sub -contractors, and waives any immunity which the Contractor may have under that title with respect to Edmonds. The Contractor further agrees to fully indemnify Edmonds from and against any and all costs of defending any such claim or demand to the end that Edmonds are held harmless there from. This paragraph shall not apply to matters covered by the defense offered pursuant to paragraph 5.1 and 5.2 above, nor to damages or claims resulting from the concurrent negligence of Edmonds, in which event the laws of the State of Washington shall govern the parties' respective liabilities. Section 6. Independent Contractor Status Established. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship shall be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Contractor shall deem to be an agent, employee or representative of Edmonds for any purpose. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and sub -contractors during the performance of this Agreement. In addition to the promises contained in paragraph 5 above, the Contractor promises to indemnify and hold harmless Edmonds from any claim, loss or liability arising from the employment related claims of its employees or sub -contractors. Section 7 Integration. The entire Agreement between the parties shall consist of this contract document. This writing constitutes the sole and exclusive Agreement of the parties {WSS600489.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 3 Packet Page 191 of 333 regarding the subject matter addressed herein and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. Section 8. Non -Waiver. Waiver by a party of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. Section 9. Applicable Law and Venue. The laws of the State of Washington shall govern this Agreement. Any lawsuit arising out of this Agreement or the work performed here under shall be brought in the Superior Court for Snohomish County, Washington. CPrtinn 10 Nnticae Notices to Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: Fire Chief City of Edmonds 121— 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to Contractor shall be sent to the following address: Richard J. Campbell, M.D. 4222 Thackeray Pl. NE Seattle, WA 98105 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three (3) days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mail, with proper postage and properly addressed. CITY OF EDMONDS Mayor Gary Haakenson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney CONTRACTOR {WSS600489.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 2 Packet Page 192 of 333 Richard J. Campbell, M.D. f WSS600489.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Page 193 of 333 AM-1204 Old Woodway Elementary Park Design Public Hearing Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: Department: Review Committee: Action: 10/16/2007 Brian McIntosh Parks and Recreation Information Time: 60 Minutes Type: Action 3. Subiect Title Presentation and Public Hearing on the preferred Park Design and Master Plan for the 5.56 acre park site located at the Old Woodway Elementary School, 23700 104th Street SW. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Adopt the preferred park plan and move forward with the final design stage in both park development and the drainage infiltration system to produce engineering bid level documents. Previous Council Action On March 27, 2007 Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects for consulting services for the Old Woodway Elementary School Park for master planning, design, and construction management services. Narrative BACKGROUND INFORMATION This 5.56 acre park site is comparable to the 5.5 acre Sierra and Seaview parks that have served their neighborhoods and the community well since their construction in the early 1970's. This new park property was purchased by the City of Edmonds in September of 2006 with Real Estate Excise Tax funds from the City Parks Acquisition Fund. Subsequent to the purchase the City was awarded acquisition grants from Snohomish County of $1,200,000 and from the State Wildlife & Recreation Program for Local Parks of $500,000. A SEPA checklist was submitted September 15, 2006 with a Determination of Non -significance issued December 5, 2006. Since last fall work has progressed in four major areas: 1. DRAINAGE: In-house Engineering Division design of a neighborhood infiltration system to be constructed on -site. 2. ABATEMENT: Selection of EHSI for consulting services for survey, specifications, and project management for abatement of hazardous materials and removal of underground storage tanks (UST's). 3. DEMOLITION: Selection of consultants Reid Middleton for specifications and project management for building demolition and selection of R.W. Rhine, Inc. as the contractor. Packet Page 194 of 333 4. PARK DESIGN: Selection of MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects, Ed MacLeod Project Manager, for park planning and design, development and project management. Abatement, demolition, and UST removal was completed on budget at the end of August with no extraordinary circumstances. Topographical surveying in preparation for grading and infiltration system installation began September 4. A public meeting was held May 3, 2007 to vision and discuss various features that could be incorporated into the park design. At a second public meeting held June 28 the consultant presented three possible conceptual alternatives that were reviewed and discussed in detail. The Engineering Division also discussed the conceptual drawing of the infiltration system. On July 11 the Planning Board was updated on the progress to that point and presented with the three alternatives for review and comment. A public hearing was held September 12 with the Planning Board recommending forwarding the preferred plan to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. Suggestions and concerns at this hearing from the public and the Planning Board included discussions regarding restrooms, trails in the panhandle area, the park being too small or not needed for a small ballfield, pervious and impervious surfaces and materials, dogs in the park, parking, and other topics. These will be addressed in the description of the preferred plan this evening or in discussion following the presentation. Both the Planning Board and the public suggested more study be undertaken in regard to possible wildlife habitat disturbance if trails are more formerly developed which would presumably increase human interaction. A Habitat Assessment conducted by PENTEC Environmental is included in your packets. Their summary concluded that: the area is dominated by forested upland habitat providing a low to moderate level of function; it contains a variety of native and non-native vegetation as well as invasives; the habitat could be improved through vegetative enhancements; and that the proposed trail construction will not have a negative impact on wildlife species currently inhabiting the project area. Link: Preferred Plan Link: Alternatives A, B, & C, Link: Drainage Infiltration System Link: Habitat Assessment Link: Tree Evaluation Link: Planning.Parks Board minutes Link: DNS & SEPA Checklist Link: Public Hearing Correspondence Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 10/11/2007 04:16 PM APRV Packet Page 195 of 333 2 Engineering 3 City Clerk 4 Mayor 5 Final Approval Form Started By: Brian McIntosh Final Approval Date: 10/12/2007 Dave Gebert 10/11/2007 04:41 PM APRV Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 04:42 PM APRV Gary Haakenson 10/12/2007 10:37 AM APRV Sandy Chase 10/12/2007 10:41 AM APRV Started On: 10/11/2007 09:25 AM Packet Page 196 of 333 Packet Page 197 of 333 � � n ,r t ` A � A04 Packet Page 198 of 333 M. 7hV H.eOs 0 Packet Page 199 of 333 Packet Page 201 of 333 fim Affil 4ti wvv,, haricrovvser, coat RTCROWSER HA. 0clive ring smarter solutions October 1, 2007 Mr. Brian McIntosh, Director City of Edmonds 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Habitat Assessment Old Woodway Elementary School Property 237th Place SW and 104th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 12130-21 Dear Brian: This letter report is provided at your request to evaluate the habitat characteristics and functions of the forested area behind the Old Woodway Elementary School located near the intersection of 237th Place SW and 104th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington. We investigated the subject property and adjacent areas on September 25, 2007 for: • Ecological/ Biological characteristics; ® Habitat Corridors; and • Species and/or Communities of Special Status. We documented the ecological and biological characteristics present, and present the following site description and findings. Several photos have been included in this report to illustrate the characteristics observed on -site. The project area consists of a forested area located immediately north of the Old Woodway Elementary School and playfield. The school was recently demolished and proposed development of the site includes a park and residential subdivision. A "woodland trail" is proposed within the forested project area. The project area is surrounded by residential development to the north, east and west. A cemetery is located to the south of the old school site. i20 Third Avenue South, Suite 110 dmonds, bllashington 98020-847 P fax 425.778.9417 Tie( 125.775.4682 Packet Page 202 of 333 Rd City of Edmonds October 1, 2007 12130-21 Page 2 The project area is forested and dominated by upland vegetation including Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), red huckleberry ( Vaccinium parvifolium), and Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii). A variety of plant species are also present but not dominant, and include red alder (Alnus rubra), Western white pine (Pinus monitcola), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), English holly (Ilex aquifolium), sitka mountain ash (Sorbus sitchensis), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa), and bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata). Several mature Douglas fir and Western hemlock are present at the site. We also observed invasive species including Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), evergreen blackberry (Rubus lacinatus), and English ivy (Hedera helm primarily within the central and western portion of the project area. Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius) is present along a construction fence on the southeastern property boundary. We did not observe streams or wetlands within or adjacent to the project area. Numerous songbirds were observed on site. Large holes in dead snags and downed trees were likely made, in part at least, by the pileated woodpecker, a state priority species. We did not observe pileated woodpecker during our visit to the site; however, habitat for this species is present within the project area. Several informal trails extend throughout the forested area. Many of these trails lead from adjacent residential properties along the northern property boundary to the field located south of the forested area. Human use within this area appeared to be low to moderate as evidenced by overgrown trails and densely vegetated areas. The project area provides an overall low to moderate level of function. The site contains a variety of mature and immature forested habitat with a low shrub understory, however, it is small in size, contains low to moderate plant species diversity, invasive and non-native plant species are present, no water -dependent or sensitive plant species are present, and the area is surrounded by residential developments. The assemblage of native fruit -bearing trees and shrubs as well as other native vegetation, indicates that this area is likely utilized by a variety of small mammals. Larger mammals may travel through the property, however, the project area is narrow and provides limited access and connections to other habitats, such as wetlands and streams. The project area contains suitable habitat for a variety of birds. The dense shrub understory of native vegetation and mix of deciduous and coniferous trees provide ample feeding and nesting opportunities. Packet Page 203 of 333 City of Edmonds 12130-21 October 1, 2007 Page 3 While invasive and non-native plant species are present within the project area, the area is dominated by native vegetation including some rather large Douglas fir and Western hemlock. The presence of invasive species creates opportunities for vegetative enhancement, such as, invasive species removal (primarily blackberry and ivy) and replanting with native species. We observed several downed trees and snags throughout the property. These trees and snags provide habitat for a variety of birds and small mammals that inhabit the property. We reviewed aerial photographs and local government stream, wetland, and conservation area maps to evaluate the site's connections to adjacent upland and wetland habitats. The study area is a part of a relatively narrow vegetated corridor that extends to the east and west and connects to other upland forested habitats. This strip is separated by 104th Avenue West to the east and by several residential roads to the west. The connecting upland habitats are also narrow vegetated strips and contain single-family residences. The City of Edmonds Environmentally Critical Areas Draft Inventory Maps for Potential Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas identifies the eastern portion of the study area as being part of a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area. The designation of a portion of the project site as a habitat conservation area signifies that disturbance and removal of this area would negatively impact fish and wildlife habitat. This conservation area includes several narrow forested strips adjacent to schools and residences to the north and east of the project area. The forested corridor likely provides some access for small and large mammals located in the area. However, the corridor is not contiguous due to the network of roads that serve the residential communities in the vicinity of the site. Our review of streams and wetlands within the vicinity of the project area did not reveal the presence of these critical areas; therefore, access to these habitats is limited. Pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) is likely to occur within and adjacent to the study area. While this species was not observed on the day of field investigation, several trees revealed evidence that this species utilizes the forested area adjacent to the Old Woodway Elementary School. This species is listed as a state candidate by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The pileated woodpecker prefers woodland habitats with large trees for nesting and roosting, and typically roosts in Western hemlock and Western redcedar, which are present at the project site. Pileated woodpecker survives primarily on insects. The project area provides suitable habitat for this state priority species. Packet Page 204 of 333 Ed City of Edmonds 12130-21 October 1, 2007 Page 4 The proposed woodland trail will be unpaved on the native soil surface and pervious. This trail will provide educational and recreational opportunities to area residents. The project area is not located in the buffer of a wetland or stream, or in an area identified as sensitive habitat, therefore, we do not anticipate the construction and presence of the proposed trail to be a detriment to fish and wildlife in the area. We anticipate minor and temporary disturbances to the existing habitat during construction of the trail, however, based on the site characteristics, we expect wildlife species currently using the project site will remain in the area and/or return to the area following construction activities. The pileated woodpecker is likely to inhabit the project site. The pileated woodpecker is a state candidate species, and is not currently documented as a threatened or endangered species on a state or federal list. This species occurs in both urban and rural areas, and is sensitive to removal of forested habitat. The project applicant does not propose forest removal or timber harvest, therefore, temporary disturbances and impacts to this habitat are anticipated to be minor and will not have a negative impact on this species or its habitat. In addition, the project applicant may propose vegetative enhancements in conjunction with trail construction. These enhancements include removal of invasive plant species and replanting of areas with native species, resulting in an overall healthier habitat. Implementation of these enhancements will likely attract more birds and possibly small mammals to the area. Vegetative enhancements within habitat conservation areas are generally encouraged by the departments and agencies of local and state government. We investigated the forested area to the north of the Old Woodway Elementary School and provided findings for ecological and biological characteristics, habitat corridors, and species and communities with special status. The project area is dominated by forested upland habitat and provides a low to moderate level of function. The area contains a variety of native vegetation as well as invasive and non-native vegetation, providing a number of opportunities for vegetative enhancement. The property provides habitat for avian species and small mammals with limited habitat for large mammals. A portion of the project area is part of a habitat conservation area that connects to upland habitats to the north and east of the project area. Existing trails are located throughout the property and could be upgraded during construction of the proposed woodland trail. Proposed trail construction will not have a negative impact on wildlife species currently inhabiting the project area. Packet Page 205 of 333 City of Edmonds October 1, 2007 Sincerely, PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL r by, JONATHAN Pe HOUGHTON, PH.D. Senior Principal Marine Fisheries Biologist jon.houghton@pentecenv.com Attachments: Photographs WACLIENTS.WP\00130\021\Habitat Assesmant_Old Woodway Elementary.doo 12130-21 Page 5 CELINA ABERCROMRIE Biologist celina.abercrombie@pentecenv.com Packet Page 206 of 333 Pentec Environmental 12130-21 Photograph 1 — Native vegetation dominates the project site. Packet Page 207 of 333 Ir 14, 1141 h P �y}y' Al e 4 • Pentec Environmental 12130-21 Photograph 3 — Deciduous and coniferous trees along the southwestern property boundary. Several snags are present throughout the property. Packet Page 209 of 333 Gilles Consulting Brian K. Gilles 4 2 5- 8 2 2- 4 9 9 4 EVALUATION OF TREES AT OLD WOODWAY SCHOOL PARK CORNER OF 237TH PL SW & 104TH AVE W, EDMONDS, WA April 30, 2007 PREPARED FOR: Ed Macleod, Principal MacCleodIRekord Landscape Architects 231 Summit Ave E Seattle, WA 98102 PREPARED BY: GILLES CONSULTING Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist RSA Certified Arborist # PN-0260 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist # RCA-418A PNW ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor # 148 61SC 31,Fax: 425-822-6314 I E-mail: bkgilles@comcast.net MEMBER P.O. Box 2366 Kirkland, VITA 98083 Packet Page 210 of 333 Y Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodiRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 2 of 29 CONTENTS ASSIGNMENT.............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 3 TreeTags....................................................................... _ _ _....................................... 4 OBSERVATIONS......................................................................................................... 4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................4 Trees in the Road Planter Strips #'s 75 - 87................................................................. 4 Trees in Front of Bldgs E, D, and H, #'s 88 - 96.......................................................... 5 Trees In -Between the Buildings, #'s 97 - 102.............................................................. 5 Trees in the Northeast and Northwest Property Comers ............................................... 6 AccumulatedStress.....................................................................................................7 CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................................7 Tree Protection Measures............................................................................................ 8 WAIVEROF LIABILITY............................................................................................ 8 ATTACHMENTS.......................................................................................................10 Tree Protection During the Demolition...., ............ ............................ ..... 24 Tree Protection During Park Development................................................................ 26 Packet Page 211 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodjRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edinonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 3 of 29 ASSIGNMENT Ed MacLeod, of MacLeodIRekord Landscape Architects, contracted with Gilles Consulting to perform a brief evaluation of the trees on the Old Woodway Elementary School Park property. The old school is scheduled for removal. The west f/2 of the property has been sold to a developer. The eastern '/2 is going to be developed into a city park, Mr. MacLeod specifically requested Gilles Consulting evaluate the current condition of the trees on the future park property to determine which trees are in good enough condition to warrant consideration of retention. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The small group of trees in the northwest property corner were give a cursory evaluation. - The majority of these trees are in Fair to Good condition and can be retained with tree protection fences placed as shown in the Tree Protection Measures Attachment of this report. - 50 trees were given a thorough evaluation: - 14 trees have current health ratings of Dead, Dying, or Poor. - These trees are not worthy of retention. They are now or will soon be potentially hazardous and should be shortened to Habitat Trees or removed for safety. - They are Ws 76, 89, 92, 99, 100, 106, 109, 115, 120, 122, and 123. - Tree # 125 is a dead Red Alder on the adjacent property to the north. The tree has been dead for some time and the bark is soughing off. The tree is in danger of failing. - I recommend contacting the neighbor and requesting that the tree be shortened into a habitat tree or removed for safety. - 35 trees have current health ratings of Fair or Good. - However, there are a few trees that are not worthy of retention unless it is incredibly obvious and easy. These trees are Fair now but will not likely survive the stresses of demolition and park construction. They should be considered "expendable" in the park design plan. - They are Xs 88, 89, 90, and 91. - The remaining 31 trees, specifically the street trees along 104th and 237, the group of trees in the corner of Bldg H, Ws 101, 102, 103, and the group of trees in the northeast property corner, are worthy of protection and retention. Trees 75, 111, and 115 should be tested with a Resistograph to determine if there is sufficient solid wood to retain them long-term. METHODOLOGY To evaluate the trees and to prepare the report, I drew upon my 25+ years of experience in the field of arboriculture and my formal education in natural resources management, dendrology, forest ecology, plant identification, and plant physiology. I also followed the protocol of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for Visual Tree Assessment Packet Page 212 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodlRckord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 4 of 29 (VTA) that includes looking at the overall health of the trees as well as the site conditions. This is a scientifically based process to look at the entire site, surrounding land and soil, as well as a complete look at the trees themselves. In examining each tree, I looked at such factors as: size, vigor, canopy and foliage condition, density of needles, injury, insect activity, root damage and root collar health, crown health, evidence of disease -causing bacteria, fungi or virus, dead wood and hanging limbs. While no one can predict with absolute certainty which trees will or will not fail, we can, by using this scientific process, assess which trees are most likely to fail and take appropriate action to minimize injury and damage. Tree Tags The trees were tagged and numbered 75 through 125. The tags are made of shiny aluminum approximately one inch by three inches in size and are attached to the tree with staples. The tags were placed as high as possible to minimize their removal and were generally placed on the west sides of the trees as inconspicuously as possible. Please refer to Attachment 1, Site Plan for an orientation to the site and the approximate location of the trees. OBSERVATIONS The site is essentially flat with a slight rise in the northwest corner of less than 5 feet. The property rises just north of the north property line. The site is currently almost all covered with impermeable surfaces including, driveways, parking lots, buildings, concrete sidewalks, and asphalted play areas around the old school buildings. There is a wide grass strip along 104" Avenue West with trees 75 through 80, and a very narrow planter strip along 2371h Place SW with #'s 81 through 87. There are old forest remnants in the northeast and northwest property corners. The trees are concentrated in three main areas, the planter strips, the northeast and northwest property corners, with a few trees scattered around the buildings. In an effort to present the information and conclusions for each tree in a manner that is clear and easy to understand, I have included a detailed spreadsheet, Attachment 2, Tree Inventory/Condition Spreadsheet. The descriptions on the spreadsheet were left brief in order to include as much pertinent information as possible and to make the report manageable. A detailed description of the terms used in the spreadsheet and in this report can be found in Attachment 3, Glosyary. A brief review of these terms and descriptions will enable the reader to rapidly move through the spreadsheet and better understand the information. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Trees in the Road Planter Strips #'s 75 - 87 The trees located within the planter strips are in fair to good condition and worthy of retention. Their location makes their protection and retention reasonably feasible. The Packet Page 213 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCieod{Rckord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edinonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 5 of 29 exception is the large Pacific Madrone (Madrona) # 76. The tree has advanced center rot and base rot. The rot is so advanced that the tree will rapidly become unstable and vulnerable to wind -throw. It should be removed for safety. Trees to Front of Buildings E, D, and H, #'s 88 - 96 # 88 is a beautiful, decades old Andromeda, Pieris japonica. o The shrub is beautiful. However, it has been protected by the corner of the building for decades and is not wind firm. It has the possibility to survive but it is low. Given the location of the root cone in relation to the building foundations it is not a good candidate for moving. ♦ If the specimen can be retained it may be worth keeping and staking. However, it has a low survival probability. The money spent on retaining it may be better spent buying a new large shrub and placing it in a better location. • # 89 is a Flowering Cherry that was just finishing bloom at my visit. o The tree as has rot in the trunks that extends down into the base. There is an advanced Carpenter Ant infestation that is quarrying out the center of the trunk. o The tree has only a few years of life left if it is untouched. The stress of demolition and park construction will hasten the demise of the tree. ♦ The tree is only worth retention if it and the entire small shrub bed around it can be kept in tact. It is not worth retention if other uses for the area are intended. • #'s 90 and 91 are the European Weeping Birch, Betula pendula, and a Scotts Pine, Pinus sylvestris located in small circular planters in front of Building D, o They have both been negatively affected by having restricted root zones --that is, limited root space of the small circular planters. o Although the both have current health ratings of Fair, like # 89, the flowering Cherry, they are only worth retention if they can be kept in tack. They are short lived with only one or two decades of life left. It may be better to use the money and energy it would take to retain these and buy large new specimens to be more strategically place elsewhere on the property. # 93 is a Dead Madrona. o Dead Madronas can stand for years. Their wood turns very hard as they age standing. However, they do rot at the ground Level and eventually fall. ♦ It will eventually need to be removed. • #'s 92, 94, 95, and 96 are in fair and good condition and worthy of retention. _Trees In -Between the Buildin s #'s 97 - 1.02 R # 97 is a large Douglas Fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii o The tree has some sort of fungal or bacterial infection in the vascular cambium and branch collars. The tree has excessive sap flow for areas on the trunk for 6 to 70 feet_ ♦ The tree is in rapid decline and not worthy of retention. • #'s 98 and 99, the Madrona and Hawthorn are also in severe decline. Packet Page 214 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodiRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 6 of 29 o They are not worthy of retention, • # 100 is a Birch in rapid decline. o The tree is not worthy of retention long-term. 1 However, it is wise to keep the tree for now and remove it later with skilled help. It will help keep the trunk and root area of # 101 cooler during the demolition and park construction work. • # 101 is a large Western White Pine, Pinus monticola. o It is worthy of retention. • # 102 is a beautiful specimen of a flowering Cherry. o The tree does have minor problems with a brown mold infection in the twigs and foliage. ♦ The tree should be put on a chemical application program during 2007, 2008, and 2009. The program should include: • Immediate treatment with appropriate fungicide to control the brown mold. This may require multiple treatments in the spring and summer of 2007. a Fungicide treatments should be repeated in spring of 2008 and 2009. • May or June of 2007 and 2009 treat the root zone with tree based fertilizer, beneficial bacteria, and beneficial fungi to stimulate healthy growth. • Late summer an experienced International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist should be hired to carefully remove the dead twigs and branches from the tree --no more. DO NOT over prune or over thin the tree. Remove only the deadwood. • In the fall of 2007, 2008, and 2009, the branches and twigs should be treated with dormant oil spray. Trees in the Northeast and Northwest Property Corners • The Trees in the Northwest Property Corner --collectively called # 125: o None of the trees appear to be potentially hazardous at this time. However, they should be checked again before the park is opened. ♦ The trees are far enough out of the main demolition work area that they can be protected with a tree protection fence as shown below. • The Trees in the Northeast Property Corner: a This group is predominately Douglas Fir with a few Western White Pine mixed in. They are #'s 103 to 123. The majority are in Fair to good condition. o Trees # 106, 109, 111, 115, 117, 120, 122, and 123 are all in poor condition and warrant removal. ♦ However, nestled in the group they have considerable protection from wind and other storm elements. Some should be further tested to determine their long-term potential to remain. They can all remain for now and managed to reduce risk later in the park development process. • Trees # 111 and 115 have base rot and center rot as well as an infestation of Carpenter Ants. Packet Page 215 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRckord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 7 of 29 These are generally signs that a tree should be removed or shortened for safety. However, these species are generally quite strong and capable of withstanding some loss of trunk wood. A 1 recommend testing the trees with a Resistograph to determine the extent of the sound wood. From that test, we should have adequate information with which to make the decision of whether or not to retain the trees. i Trees # 117 and 120 are in the middle of the grove between the east property line fence and the 104"' Avenue West road shoulder. They are in poor condition but do contribute to the overall viability of the small forest remnant. Given their location under the canopies of the larger trees, they could be left for now and monitored for any changes in their condition in future years. a Trees # 106, 109, 122, and 123 are in the same general area as 117 and 120. However, their root rot and base rot is more advanced. They have the potential to fail in a storm. I recommend that they be shortened into habitat trees for safety. Please refer to Attachment 6, Wildlife Snag -- Habitat :free Creation and Benef is for details. Accumulated Stress It is a common misconception to think that because a tree has not failed in a series of recent storms, the tree is not likely to fail anytime in the future. As professionals, we used to believe this to be true. Only recently have we become aware that the exact opposite is true and that trees accumulate stress internally. The stress and internal fractures can cause a tree to fail on a seemingly windless day. As professionals in the field of tree evaluation, we can only provide you with an evaluation based upon our training and experience. Based on this, we provide you with a recommendation of best management practices for each tree. It is up to your personal comfort level as to whether you follow those recommendations or not. Since we have had several large storms this fall and winter, no one can accurately guarantee whether or not a tree is totally stable. However, we can inform you that, based upon training and experience, the tree(s) noted above are more likely to fail at some time in the future. It then becomes your decision what to do and when to do it. CONCLUSIONS The trees on the property are a great asset to the future park and to the community as a whole. Many are worthy of the energy required to retain them, A few are not. Packet Page 216 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodlRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 8 of 29 Tree Protection Measures In order for trees to survive the stresses placed upon them in the construction process, tree protection must be planned in advance of equipment arrival on site. If tree protection is not planned integral with the design and layout of the project, the trees will suffer needlessly and possibly die. With proper preparation, often costing little or nothing extra to the project budget, trees can survive and thrive after construction. This is critical for tree survival because damage prevention is the single most effective treatment for trees on construction sites, Once trees are damaged, the treatment options available are limited. The minimum Tree Protection Measures in Attachment 5, 1 ree Protection Measures are on three separate sheets that can be copied and introduced into all relevant documents such as site plans, permit applications and conditions of approval, and bid documents so that everyone involved is aware of the requirements. These Tree Protection Measures are intended to be generic in nature. They will need to be adjusted to the specific circumstances of your site that takes into account the location of 'improvements and the locations of the trees. WAIVER OF LIABILITY There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability, which may be present and cannot be ascertained, such as, root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more which may be hidden. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. Adverse weather conditions can dramatically affect the health and safety of a tree in a very short amount of time. While I have used every reasonable means to examine these trees, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at this point in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. The tree evaluation consists of an external visual inspection of an individual tree's root flare, trunk, and canopy from the ground only unless otherwise specified. The inspection may also consist of taking trunk or root soundings for sound comparisons to aid the evaluator in determining the possible extent of decay within a tree, Soundings are only an aid to the evaluation process and do not replace the use of other more sophisticated diagnostic tools for determining the extent of decay within a tree. As conditions change, it is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to ensure that the long-term success of the project is ensured. It is the responsibility of the property owner to obtain all required permits from city, county, state, or federal agencies. It is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and permit conditions. If there is a homeowners association, it is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that apply to tree pruning and tree removal. Packet Page 217 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 9 of 29 This tree evaluation is to be used to inform and guide the client in the management of their trees. This in no way implies that the evaluator is responsible for performing recommended actions or using other methods or tools to further determine the extent of internal tree problems without written authorization from the client. Furthermore, the evaluator in no way holds that the opinions and recommendations are the only actions required to insure that the tree will not fail. A second opinion is recommended. The client shall hold the evaluator harmless for any and all injuries or damages incurred if the evaluator's recommendations are not followed or for acts of nature beyond the evaluator's reasonable expectations, such as severe winds, excessive rains, heavy snow loads, etc. This report and all attachments, enclosures, and references, are confidential and are for the use of the client concerned. They may not be reproduced, used in any way, or disseminated in any form without the prior consent of the client concerned and Gilles Consulting. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultural needs. Sincerely, ian I �Iles,C�onsul�ti ISA Certified Arborist # PN-0260 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist # RCA-418A PNW-ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor #148 Packet Page 218 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodlRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 10 of 29 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1 - SITE PLAN ATTACHMENT 2 - TREE INVENTORY/CONDITIONS SPREADSHEET ATTACHMENT 3 - GLOSSARY ATTACHMENT 4 - PHOTOS ATTACHMENT S - TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ATTACHMENT 6 - WILDLIFE SNAG -- HABITAT TREE CREATION ATTACHMENT 7 - REFERENCES Packet Page 219 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodjRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 11 of 29 ATTACHMENT 1 - SITE PLAN /1 U 1 2M 231TH PL SVI flST1NG CONDITIONS SITE IMP IS W�P ON RECORD UNINOS DATED 104, 1955, AND 195 AS PROVIDED h-4* KIY-0E-EOMON0&, MAY FFER FROM CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THEST DRAWINGS. Packet Page 220 of 333 Z Z Z Z O a D 'VN �Z3ZC�1 o=i �OmDa a a C1 sr .4 3 N 3 X m mm a w Oa U M 0mJM CD C 7 v Nu, Na N CNh N A+i 00 La U; QmS 4. aN aA fJ ]N Wada cNn . w �'9.9a> Q O3 A 'UNW3>m; � c a 4..Q -am 9mC m � 8S m Wf Ol A f W � A 4 m � A i �Q � A•��'�w 3 �J �� J» n• 0 w r- a m_ " ¢'o-c ti t em }b p m q mom• � :R d° 7$ o• � 3r � oe a° � � m �. � m a c m m c L0 c � G..� 3 �. m 47n 3m3m O 3W L7 3W ti 303w ti G) 3ro3m3m 47 •'c Gl '� O 3ro .< 3 J a3� ai 4 m5 m o 4� m 3 c m..aay. 3 3 a 3 m 3 am 3 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 J 3 9 m a H m m w e qi 3; ®oaa_aa_ ro m m m s� ,y ga_ �is� ga�a�a Qa a r. mo a"d mid N 0A1 `t 6A1 N'z _ 00 4 _ m Y _ m� _ m� _ N Y - d K _ PI Y - { 0 y 4 co a w � A D D D m m m £ 3 Z A m � 2 ea�te pl M7kMikN wiw -4 M Y -1 e c 71 Carm ffiA A0C)�+�C .. a0 WMIR m n w n d ii d ii S' p sr , m 3 r .. .. � �• -I Q a ac o p S g m m n Z Z Z zz Z m z z Z CD d W w O S D D D Y D � m> D O D ® n r O 4 O O O O ro ss. 0 O � a ~ � d W m n w d M N a• A p m L m m m m m ro m m m m m d m m J a J N 3 0 .Js m Y SL a m v M d 3 0 0'�� a v boa amd �cAom #m� �o�a•®mm `'' -^ 'n- _. m w '+7 J Nm w Nm ro rom ,�' a' v o- s m s m u - m a P. n a w o a n a gm �s d D$$ J" ;F ww w a x m o a o e7 m m w m a m a m m a J a 5 s+o 0 sma 0 Vay 'OQ �a m m m � ai °,i5 J �'m gm a•m [� 3 m c o z o wi 3 '" W o 0 0. O o ro s a A m @ S m xZ g• J a cn J o_ ut J a v, � � ? p d a O A z m E� 4 N� c w °' m Z N o 3 a d d w w �'n � a u a a o m go • 'O 0° �O a o � oFoaAi.S3 d' A m J S9 o u m;:�� c a �a m o a J 5530.`^ o 5• v a m a� ro a ro OS o e01i p 0 O O J O Wa a£ a' O o iO' = ^» 3 m •. o o EF B vs- v e� � a 'a � Fa m 0•' fl,m n .J.4 vi n a o � �0 �' �' � w d o ro � Vi U� �Ja. �• � � � si m - a n a v a _ v 0 0n 0n 0n 0 0 m a Q n. n0 x � rrr w 5 �' w a > £ n ® a o a o a T o o m a J m'am a ?, a J Tim o '+gymo a J vm°a 8 J a J aig.a a J 43 13 a m x ;D m d m W m a n m EL o a' an d m m m w 3 J w 3 N 3 J S 0 O O C Ort a S 8 m 4 a �.0 W m W g S N 8 y Q N 6 N 3 33Er 3 3Amt 3 3St..3 ��^ i a om c `mac FcF m£ °'£ wFc£ c`�eFmJ-oommJ�o� - -Da m m W�-4a4 a4 f a4 4a4.m l�aom5 o Z m m m W W W. W lD o, y m a 3 - I. Packet Page 221 of 333 G) m p m 14 m m (O fP l6 t4 �D m m 06 Qm m N O m m -4 m u, m a m MY '� zr Q 0 a O 'Q v O 3 3 m iv Ol w a v ou w o> nNi m ai °-' a tit N o d o m N 0 r 0 A aP m m de iR 3e tmi+ o CA V1 w (AA omr m v°ii A cn 3 m 3� •c � mac 3 m 3 m c K 3 m 3? e m 3 m � a�Og�mo. 5 m0 m0 a m� m�a mo a mo g a 'KSW A D W N D o a D D D Y D Y D D [7 O �H,�a� �.� m a m Q W n V :la q S ro m Q � z 0 "63.a " fP d H F N m .. a T N m n .° 3 d — N — m — ti m o c Q W ago z Z Z Z U °� w Z. Z m m z n O m D Y O D O Y O F w u°i v D O 3 O Y D m w D D m O e a a Q N @ w R umu�� U% MO I o m ems a 3 4''0 �ID O 22 a m a a a n a m G? G) Gi m G) ^� n a o Goo m G5 3 C a a O 3 � w I. � o um� F _E ym Cu 0 P m rom rowm P® w 9 a m saf. m m° w 0 o °O m d ,9,^ 9 N y N g f`n C F P, g. c c d d o c o C L a L P- O •� .°r i < m .mi m° 4 c_ d m c —Srn n ° d. a Q. a L F N `S N m R4 °a `i ° .r y .� N '[S -O m 'D 'G 6j m (11 N .fir 9 H d N O Cl 0-5- g m N' C,) N a Q. w 3 d � g m C � d •° d 3 3 N a O F m 0 = n C �_ m� N� O �, N O 9 a �� In a 0 0 a° 3a ma6i ° and 3 ciq,N 2fn N-J' m rs S. 0 a °•' a ?I 6 41 ymao+f f� d 8 C n3 ' o q y iA m 3E d g ro ]S m F m g L L gw 6m ax $ •O m g a a N 6 g p ° o n O m l F 3 m° ms S PL = v a m n �n s �•�3 a o SIP -am �Q eae a 2 ' 02 2 3 `_. Ep 3. CL 0 0 c 0 m n 1 o m C d� -O O v v v O 0 O c� °v Oa „� a O °v�'n a 0 y Q 0 N O P g x v O v P v O v 4 emi � 3 n �d y n:Tarm' m ti� m m °%aiti ao'w o v'ei a o o d m P m m o nem 3 g 3 O g o �' S 0 o m 8 2 g s g a q 1D O_ 9 3 Er �. g 3 3 a N'p m a m 3 3 3 u '3 g g g ±a a m 3 m 'm tliir m W ro a e3 n m W p p' m 3 W m A Z n l0 N p O gILI m a 3 a fl 3 p y a' ro O N N N L a m al G F c i g ° s; m m w O wF's E g 4 0 m 4 S' an 4 � H 4 ti 4 4 Z 2 4 �Y 4 0 4 Q = m m m m m 3 m m ro ro m m ro A Packet Page 222 of 333 ' fp ' Fp �l Of ' N ' A ' W ' N •' O a m m o J o O a N o A o W A m f1'1 o T a T a v $ ❑ T t3 T ❑ T ❑ T ❑ T ❑ T a T v 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 -V m 33 W W 0 m W 02 W O+4 s N N N W f0 a N m mmy K r* W A. O W L1 = m Q) A O m A A N A OJ y iR a SQ m m bE oo b° m %e m o m 3E rn a de m w m W m m N, m m w d w m m w d K m w w d d d K 3� d @ 3Q 0 3 3 P 3 0 m 1 3 0 1 — 3.5. 3 a 3 Q 1 3 m M •C K 91 Y `Z `S N K � Sw @ d tm t N C m C @ 3 L r { m m m m m m m ro o» m m m m m y A d y c D D D D D D D D D o On Z vQ°' 0 m fl. 3 z 2 2 y �° M Q J m m m d °Y s '. s s �� R N � N� £ n a °: m es a s R £� m� 'm• �• s � W M H�� z 2 m a y z Z z Gml m O m a ID WE z z N Q N m Z D X y = D m r- 0 r 0 ~o D i7 D ❑ m �i d D ❑ a m m D C7 D ❑ D ❑ m o m H 'o a m D ❑ D ❑ m m g G m m 4 fl. 7n. — A m v T N 'y � m m W 3 z a m 3 z a a A o m 0 z m S m a M M p 4. lJ W oCT Z m m 0 2 3 m m oa = G? o 'm z m A 3 z m ��° eg o O m 3 F m c. g 0 �' -o m arc m �0 3 m M» era a M 'pN N �^ N �• Na �' °? W Nm N m O m R m y. � v m C m^ v 4 3 0 R ' A O a a m W RL r m m T -n '� T T T T w 0 °O T m T w T T d Li p D z I m E. - T. - O C m - w - w G - - - O � - a Gi a m v T iidd T m^ 5 v 2 0 � a '� 'o 0 o a @ m �i`o'-a g? v o o a o Cf m � o 'B %'a v v 0 v ° a T m o m m ®w w 3' j o y' o l3 m o m' m 3 o' Qo m EZ; 3• a of M rt© a � w m° w p o D d so a 8 o y �° 0' o �n ob' o� w �@ Q'S m45 m 'o» m s '�5 o0 3 0 ox° m ad: H1°fRwm�a kw � m N a '� q°08 s o�o,Er ogo ; fi a n 3@ a 3 m° a a a° 3 m o a s' w a m m@ w w r.° a a �' w a a 3 3 m A dm .N m mw o T T N - o m 3E0mO roo '°9mC � c f � 3 R pa N • 49 R S� S ' N .mi. W 9j. N �3 0 N m m N N n J Cf. 6F m m N z m @ @ m m m m m o m @ m m m n Packet Page 223 of 333 N N ? W N N NO m m a ry O O 0 v T T ' �1 m n ° ° m z 3 3 m N n N A v ;J A m m O� qro 41 0 3 a0 O) P E A A p N @ m Ina n ''O w m A r M d to m m 3 m m, �' u°i N m w 3 ro o N 3 93 fwi� F NN 3 3 j 3 a v A chi 3-- 3 m an �• 3 � @ o v, � ro � � O 3' � Z 2 2 � w W N m �O K S O w N S S ry ry @ O IOU d w croi an . 3 a@ m@ n an @ N w Pi 00 N pp o a >Z N C m = a N w T3 °� = ro 3 a rp �' w 3 a m w @ Er a� g rn E ° m ° n 00 �;ao4 w c F a m '0 - n y'o ay n Sao 0 o ig Nw 3° 3o 0 3 @ -' 6 w N 5 a mwW p _ oro @ r Q o S40 3 O m � c 6 @d a � s m ° @ •� eFa w g o o $ z w o _ n ,� Si aT ° 5 a x n G .'0 A g o o T a m Y z a l Z cam s a a � 0 a o v roams a 6T o 3o'j`� 3 4 @ S @, rt @ @ In A @y� .w. n ° Id O S groj O d N N i a N 0 N @ n G A Packet Page 224 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for NlacCleod�Relcord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 16 of 29 ATTACHMENT 3 - GLOSSARY Terms Used in This Report, on the Tree Condition / Inventory Spreadsheet, and Their Significance In an effort to clearly present the information for each tree in a manner that facilitates the reader's ability to understand the conclusions I have drawn for each tree, I have collected the information onto a spreadsheet format. This spreadsheet was developed by Gilles Consulting based upon the Hazard `free Evaluation Form from the book, The Evaluation gfHazard Treav in Urban Areas, by Matheney and Clarice. The descriptions were left brief on the spreadsheet in an effort to include as much pertinent information as possible, to make the report manageable, and, to not bore the reader with infinite levels of detail. A review of these terms and descriptions will allow the reader to rapidly move through the report and understand the information. 1) TREE #—the individual number of each tree. 2) SPECIES —this describes the species of each tree with both most readily accepted common name and the officially accepted scientific name. 3) DBH—Diameter Breast Height. This is the standard measurement of trees taken at 4.5 feet above the average ground level of the tree base. i) Occasionally it is not practical to measure a tree at 4.5 feet above the ground. The most representative area of the trunk near 4.5 feet is then measured and noted on the spreadsheet. For instance, a tree that forks at 4.5 feet can have an unusually large swelling at that point. The measurement is taken below the swelling and noted as, `28.4" at 36"'. ii) Trees with multiple stems are listed as a "clump of x," with x being the number of trunks in the clump. Measurements may be given as an average of all the trunks, or individual measurements for each trunk may be listed. (1) Every effort is made to distinguish between a single tree with multiple stems and several trees growing close together at the bases. 4) DRIP LINE —The radius, the distance from the trunk to the furthest branch tips. 5) % LCR—Percentage of Live Crown Ratio. The relative proportion of green crown to overall tree height. This is an important indication of a tree's health. If a tree has a high percentage of Live Crown Ratio, it is likely producing enough photosynthetic activity to support the tree. If a tree has less than 30 to 40% LCR it can create a shortage of needed energy and can indicate poor health and vigor. 6) SYMMETRY —is the description of the form of the canopy. That is, the balance or overall shape of the canopy and crown. This is the place I list any major defects in the tree shape —does the tree have all its foliage on one side or in one unusual area. Symmetry can be important if there are additional defects in the tree such as rot pockets, cracks, loose roots, weak crown. etc. Symmetry is generally categorized as Generally Symmetrical, Minor Asymmetry or Major Asymmetry: Packet Page 225 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodjRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 17 of 29 i) Gen. Sym.—Generally Symmetrical. The canopy/foliage is generally even on all sides with spacing of scaffold branches typical for the species, both vertically and radially. ii) Min. Asym_—Minor Asymmetry. The canopy/foliage has a slightly irregular shape with more weight on one side but appears to be no problem for the tree. iii) Mai. Asym.—Major Asymmetry. The canopy/foliage has a highly irregular shape for the species with the majority of the weight on one side of the tree. This can have a significant impact on the tree's stability, health and hazard potential —especially if other defects are noted such as cracks, rot, root defects. 7) FOLIAGE/BRANCH—describes the foliage of the tree in relation to a perfect specimen of that particular species. First the branch growth and foliage density is described, and then any signs or symptoms of stress and/or disease are noted. The condition of the foliage, or the branches and buds for deciduous trees in the dormant season, are important indications of a tree's health and vigor. i) For Deciduous trees in the dormant season: (1) The structure of the tree is visible, (2) The quantity and quality of buds indicates health, and is described as good bud set, average bud set, or poor bud set. These are abbreviated in the spreadsheet as: gbs, abs, or pbs. (3) The amount of annual shoot elongation is visible and is another major indication of tree health and vigor. This is described as: a) Excellent, Good, Average, or Short Shoot Elongation. These are abbreviated in the spreadsheet as ESE, GSE, ASE, OR SSE. ii) For evergreen trees year round and deciduous trees in leaf, the color and density of the foliage indicates if the tree is healthy or stressed, or if an insect infestation, a bacterial, fungal, or viral infection is present. Foliage is categorized on a scale from: (1) Dense ---extremely thick foliage, an indication of healthy vigorous growth, (2) Good —thick foliage, thicker than average for the species, (3) Normal/Average—thick foliage, average for the species, an indication of healthy growth, (4) Thin or Thinning —needles and leaves becoming less dense so that sunlight readily passes through, an indication that the tree is under serious stress that could impact the long-term survivability and safety of the tree, (5) Sparse —few leaves or needles on the twigs, an indication that the tree is under extreme stress and could indicate the future death of the tree (6) Necrosis —the presence of dead twigs and branchlets. This is another significant indication of tree health. A few dead twigs and branches are reasonably typical in most trees of size. However, if there are dead twigs and branchlets all over a certain portion of the tree, or all over Packet Page 226 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 18 of 29 the tree, these are indications of stress or attack that can have an impact on the tree's long-term health. (7) Hangers —A term to describe a large branch or limb that has broken off but is still hanging up in the tree. These can be particularly dangerous in adverse weather conditions. 8) CROWN CONDITION —the crown is uppermost portion of the tree, generally considered the top 10 to 20% of the canopy or that part of the canopy above the main trunk in deciduous trees and above the secondary bark in evergreen trees. i) The condition of the tree's crown is a reflection of the overall health and vigor of the entire tree. The crown is one of the first places a tree will demonstrate stress and pathogenic attack such as root rot. ii) If the Crowe Condition is healthy and strong, this is a good sign. If the crown condition is weak, broken out, or shows other signs of decline, it is an indication that the tree is under stress. It is such an important indication of health and vigor that this is the first place a trained forester or arborist looks to begin the evaluation of a tree. Current research reveals that, by the time trees with root rot show significant signs of decline in the crown, fully 50% or more of the roots have already rotted away. Crown Condition can be described as: (1) Healthy Crown ---exceptional growth for the species. (2) Average Crown —typical for the species. (3) Weak Crown —thin spindly growth with thin or sparse needles. (4) Flagging Crown —describes a tree crown that is weak and unable to grow straight up. (5) Dying Crown —describes obvious decline that is nearing death. (6) Dead Crown —the crown has died due to pathological or physical injury. The tree is considered to have significant stress and/or weakness if the crown is dead. (7) Broken out —a formerly weak crown condition that has been broken off by adverse weather conditions or other mechanical means. (8) Regenerated or Regenerating —formerly broken out crowns that are now growing back, Regenerating crowns may appear healthy, average, or weak and indicate current health of the tree. (9) Suppressed —a term used to describe poor condition of an entire tree or just the crown. Suppressed crowns are those that are entirely below the general level of the canopy of surrounding trees which receive no direct sunlight. They are generally in poor health and vigor. Suppressed trees are generally trees that are smaller and growing in the shade of larger trees around them. They generally have thin or sparse needles, weak or missing crowns, are prone to insect attack as well as bacterial and fungal infections. 9) TRUNK this is the area to note any defects that can have an 'impact on the tree's stability or hazard potential. Typical things noted are: i) FORKED --bifurcation of branches or trunks that often occur at a narrow angle. Packet Page 227 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MaXlcodlRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 19 of 29 INCLUDED BARK ---a pattern of development at branch or trunk junctions where bark is turned inward rather than pushed out. This can be a serious structural defect in a tree that can and often does lead to failure of one or more of the branches or trunks especially during severe adverse weather conditions. iii) EPICORMIC GROWTH —this is generally seen as dense thick growth near the trunk of a tree. Although this looks like a healthy condition, it is in fact the opposite. Trees with Epicormic Growth have used their reserve stores of energy in a last ditch effort to produce enough additional photosynthetic surface area to produce more sugars, starches and carbohydrates to support the continued growth of the tree. Generally speaking, when conifers in the Pacific Northwest exhibit heavy amounts of Epicormic Growth, they are not producing enough food to support their current mass and are already in serious decline. iv) INTERNAL STRUCTURAL WEAKNESS —a physical characteristic of the tree trunk, such as a kink, crack, rot pocket, or rot column that predisposes the tree trunk to failure at the point of greatest weakness. v) BOWED —a gradual curve of the trunk. This can indicate an Internal Structural Weakness or an overall weak tree. It can also indicate slow movement of soils or historic damage of the tree that has been corrected by the curved growth. vi) KINKED —a sharp angle in the tree trunk that indicates that the normal growth pattern is disrupted. Generally this means that the internal fibers and annual rings are weaker than straight trunks and prone to failure, especially in adverse weather conditions. vii) GROUND FLOWER —an area of deformed bark near the base of a tree trunk that indicates long-term root rot. 10) ROOT COLLAR —this is the area where the trunk enters the soil and the buttress roots flare out away from the trunk into the soil. It is here that signs of rot, decay, insect infestation, fungal or bacterial infection are noted. NAD stands for No Apparent Defects, 11) ROOTS ---any abnormalities such as girdling roots, roots that wrap around the tree itself that strangle the cambium layer and kill the tree, are noted here. 12) COMMENTS --this is the area to note any additional information that would not fit in the previous boxes or attributes about the tree that have bearing on the health and structure of the tree. 13) CURRENT HEALTH RATINGA description of the tree's general health ranging from dead, poor, suppressed, fair, good, to excellent. 14) RECOMMENDATION —this is an estimate of whether or not the tree is off sufficient health, vigor, and structure that it is worth consideration of retention. NOTE: TREES WITH THE SAME DESCRIPTION AND DIFFERENT RATINGS: Two trees may have the same descriptions in the matrix boxes, one may be marked "Significant," while another may be marked "Non -Significant." The difference is in the degree of the description -early "necrosis" versus advanced "necrosis" for instance. Packet Page 228 of 333 Evaluation of 'Frees for MacCleodIRckord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 20 of 29 Another example is center rot or base rot. In a Western Red Cedar tree the presence of low or even moderate rot is not significant and does not diminish the strength of the tree. However, low levels of rot in the base of a Douglas Fir tree in an area known to have virulent pathogens present is highly significant and predisposes that tree to windthrow. Again, these descriptions were left brief in an effort to include as much pertinent information as possible, to make the report manageable, and, not to bore the reader with infinite levels of detail. Packet Page 229 of 333 ATTACHMENT 4 - PHOTOS . j 14 Rotting lower trunk of # 89 with Carpenter Ant frass The rotten lower trunks of # 76 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 21 of 29 The restricted base of # 90 The rotten lower trunk of # 75 Packet Page 230 of 333 .9b. VIVO Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodiRekord landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 23 of 29 ATTACHMENT 5 - TREE PROTECTION MEASURES In order for trees to survive the stresses placed upon them in the construction process, tree protection must be planned in advance of equipment arrival on site. If tree protection is not planned integral with the design and layout of the project, the trees will suffer needlessly and will possibly die. With proper preparation, often costing little, or nothing extra to the project budget, trees can survive and thrive after construction. This is critical for tree survival because damage prevention is the single most effective treatment for trees on construction sites. Once trees are damaged, the treatment options available are limited. The following minimum Tree Protection Measures are included on three separate sheets so that they can be copied and introduced into all relevant documents such as site plans, permit applications and conditions of approval, and bid documents so that everyone involved is aware of the requirements. These Tree Protection Measures are intended to be generic in nature. They will need to be adjusted to the specific circumstances of your site that takes into account the location of improvements and the locations of the trees. Packet Page 232 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCheodIRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 24 of 29 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES: Tree Protection During the Demolition TrAc#mwr Two -- -rre- izr ( and Tee- T�p}-ec io- �Ia� 1 114 lit Flp M \\ 237TH Pi_ SW -00, STING CONDITIONS SITE MAP IS BAST OE6 AS PROON RECORD 1NTNG5 DATED IBSI, 1855, ANO 7B5 +A THE 9RY-dF-EDMONDry.- E 05TH:G-coNeff Ns- Miley - FER PRO)CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. -- —) I ROH PIAE Packet Page 233 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 301,2007 Page 25 of 29 Refer to Attachment 2 Above, Tree Removal and Tree Protection Measures Plan for visual locations of the following notes. A. Install tree protection fence 2 feet into pavement measured from north and northwest edge. Begin at road shoulder and extend around grove to the retaining wall. a. Extend tree protection fence to connect with 5-foot chainlink fence along north property line. B. Install tree protection fence at base of retaining wall on south side. C. Install tree protection fence in an are 15 feet from the base of tree on the south and west side of tree and extend fence straight from the south side and 15 feet from the tree to the western corner of the retaining wall. a. Extend tree protection fence to connect with 5-foot chainlink fence along north property line. D. Extend a tree protection fence from the 5-foot chainlink fence at the north property line, extending in a southwesterly direction to protect the critical root zone of the group of trees listed as # 124 at a distance of not less than 25 feet from the base of the trees in this grouping. E. Install tree protection fence 3 feet from the wall of Building C and extending northeast and southwest from sidewalk to sidewalk. Construct a parallel fence 28 feet to the south from sidewalk to sidewalk to create a perimeter fence around trees 100 and 101. F. Install tree protection fence 1 feet from and parallel to the wall of Building H and extending from the sidewalk to the curb edge. Construct a parallel fence 60 feet to the south from sidewalk to the curb of the drive. Enclose the perimeter of the tree protection by extending the fence along the side walk to connect these two and along the curb to connect these two fence lines to protect trees # 92 to 96. G. Install circular tree protection fence 60 feet in diameter in a radial are 30 feet from the trunk of the tree. a. Any construction debris and or impacts of any kind within this tree protection fence will result in a significant fine base upon the appraised value of this tree. H, Install tree protection fence that encloses the entire planter strip including trees 75 through 80 that begins along the road should of 104"' Avenue West, at the edge of the north and south ends of the planter and extends 10 feet west of the existing west curb edge of the planter. 1. Install tree protection fence around the street #'s 81 through 87. Construct the fence along north side of the 237"' Place SW sidewalk. Construct a parallel fence 25 feet north of the sidewalk fence and connect the north and south parallel fences with a side fence 20 feet from the trunks of #'s 81 and 87. Packet Page 234 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRekord landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edinonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 26 of 29 Tree Protection During Park Development Tree Protection Fences will need to be placed around each tree or group of trees to be retained. a. Tree Protection Fences are to be placed according to the attached drawing around the tree or group of trees to be saved. i. Specific Tree Protection Fence Locations: 1. b. Tree Protection Fences must be inspected prior to the beginning of any construction work/activities. c. Nothing must be parked or stored within the Tree Protection Fences --no equipment, vehicles, soil, debris, or construction supplies of any sorts. 2. Cement trucks must not be allowed to deposit waste or wash out materials from their trucks within the Tree Protection Fences. 3. The Tree Protection Fences need to be clearly marked with the following or similar text in four inch or larger letters: "TREE PROTECTION FENCE DO NOT ENTER THIS AREA DO NOT PARK OR STORE MATERIALS WITHIN THE PROTECTION AREA Any questions, call Brian K. Gilles at Gilles Consulting @ 425-4I7-0850" 5. The area within the Tree Protection Fencing must be covered with wood chips, hog fuel, or similar materials to a depth of S to 14 inches. The materials should be placed prior to beginning construction and remain until the Tree Protection Fencing is taken down. 6. When excavation occurs near trees that are scheduled for retention, the following procedure must be followed to protect the long term survivability of the tree: a. An International Society of Arboriculture, (ISA) Certified Arborist must be working with all equipment operators. i. The Certified Arborist should be outfitted with a shovel, hand pruners, a pair of loppers, a handsaw, and a power saw (a "sawsall" is recommended). Packet Page 235 of 333 Evaluation of 'frees for MacClcodJRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edinonds WA Gilles Consulting Apri130, 2007 Pagc 27 of 29 b. When any roots of one inch diameter or greater, of the tree to be retained, is struck by the equipment, the Certified Arborist should stop the equipment operator. c_ The Certified Arborist should then excavate around the tree root by hand/shovel and cleanly cut the tree root. i. The Certified Arborist should then instruct the equipment operator to continue. 7. Putting Utilities Under the Root Zone: a. Boring under the root systems of trees (anal other vegetation) shall be done under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist. This is to be accomplished by excavating a limited trench or pit on each side of the critical root zone of the tree and then hand digging or pushing the pipe through the soil under the tree. The closest pit walls shall ,be a minimum of 7 feet from the center of the tree and shall be sufficient depth to lay the pipe at the grade as shown on the plan and profile. b. Tunneling under the roots of trees shall be done under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist in an open trench by carefully excavating and hand digging around areas where large roots are exposed. No roots 1 inch in diameter or larger shall be out. c. The contractor shall verify the vertical and horizontal location of existing utilities to avoid conflicts and maintain minimum clearances; adjustment shall be trade to the grade of the new utility as required. 8. Watering: a. The trees will require significant watering throughout the summer and early fall in order to survive long-term. An easy and economical watering can be done using soaker hoses placed three feet from the trunk of the tree and spiraled around the tree. One 75-foot soaker hose per tree is adequate. It is best to place the soakers using landscape staples, (available from HD Fowler in Bellevue for pennies apiece) then cover the area with two to three inches composed materials. The composted material will act as a mulch to minimize evaporation and will also stimulate the microbial activity of the soil which is another benefit to the health of the tree. b. Water the tree to a depth of 18 to 20 inches. I recommended leaving the water on the soaker hoses for six to eight hours and then digging down to determine how deep your water is penetrating. Then adjust accordingly. It may take a good two days of watering to reach the proper depth. c. Once the water reaches the proper depth, turn off the hoses for four weeks and then water again. Water more often when temperatures increase — every three weeks when temperatures exceed 80 degrees and every two weeks when temperatures exceed 90 degrees. This drying out of the soil in between watering is important to prevent soil pathogens from attacking the trees. Packet Page 236 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodIRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edmonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 28 of 29 ATTACHMENT £ - WILDLIFE SNAG — HABITAT TREE CREATION There are occasions where hazardous trees need not be completely removed. Shortening is the preferred methods in these types of areas rather than complete removal. Standing dead trees, also known as "vertical structure" in forest ecology terms, provide important wildlife habitat. Recent studies at the University of Washington have shown that the third most significant reason for the decline of songbirds in the Puget Sound region is the lack of standing dead trees. (The primary reason for the decline of desirable wildlife is loss of habitat. The second reason is predation by dogs, cats, Grey Squirrels, and Opossums.) These studies reveal that as many as 54% of desirable urban wildlife utilize standing dead trees or nurse logs on the ground in one or more important life cycle. For instance, Black Capped Chickadees must excavate a new cavity every spring in order to successfully mate and produce a brood of off spring. The opportunity exists here to remove the dangerous portions of these trees and leave the snags for wildlife. You can also place trunk sections carefully on the ground as nurse logs. The logs, if in contact with the ground, soak up moisture and release it slowly throughout the summer. This supports plants and animals in the immediate area. Brush piles strategically place for birds and mammals to use as safe areas also have important wildlife benefits. These two measures have the added benefit of reducing the cost because a tree service does not need to do as much clean up or removal. The tree service selected can spend a few extra minutes on the top of each snag to make the cut look like it was snapped off in the wind jagged and irregular. This enhances the aesthetic appeal of the tree. Packet Page 237 of 333 Evaluation of Trees for MacCleodlRekord Landscape Architects Old Woodway School Park, Edunonds WA Gilles Consulting April 30, 2007 Page 29 of 29 ATTACHMENT 7 - REFERENCES Dirr, Michael A. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants, Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation, and Uses. Champaign: Stipes Publishing Company, 1990. 2. Eric Allen, et al. Common Tree Diseases c f British Columbia. Victoria: Canadian Forest Service, 1996. Harris, Richard W. et al. Arboriculture, Integrated Management Uf 'Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines. 4t" ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2004. 4. Johnson, Warren T. and Lyon, Howard H. Insects That Feed on Trees and ,Shrubs. Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates, 1991. Matheney, Nelda P. and Clark, James R. Evaluation of Hazard 'Trees. 2''d ed. Savoy: The International Society of Arboriculture Press, 1994 6, Matheney, Nelda P. and Clark, James R. Trees & Development, A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development, Savoy: The International Society of Arboriculture Press, 1998. 7. Mathews, Daniel. C aseade -- Olympic Natural History. Portland, Oregon_ Raven Editions with the Portland Audubon Society, 1992. 8. Mattheck, Claus and Breloer, Helge. The Body Language of'Trees, A Handbook for Failure Analysis. London: HMSO, 1994. 9, Scharpf, Robert F. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers. Albany, California: USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 521, rev. June 1993. 10. Sinclair, Wayne A., Lyon, Howard H., and Johnson, Warren T. Diseases of Trees and Shrubs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987. 11, Watson, Gary W., and Neely, Dan, eds. Trees & Building Sites. Savoy: The International Society of Arboriculture Press, 1995. Packet Page 238 of 333 CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES September 12, 2007 Chair Guenther called the regular meeting of the Planning Board to order at 7:03 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 -- 51" Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Cary Guenther, Chair Janice Freeman Jim Young Don Ilenderson Judith Works Michael Bowman John Reed READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Gina Coccia, Planner Brian McIntosh, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT John Dewhirst, Vice Chair BOARD MEMBER REED MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JULY 11, 2007 BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER YOUNG SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD MEMBER YOUNG MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JULY 25, 2007 BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER FREEMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The Board agreed to place Item 6b (Public Hearing and Presentation on the Conceptual Park Design and Master Plan for the Old Woodway Elementary School) before Item 6a (Continued Public Hearing Regarding FCDC 17.40). No other changes were made to the proposed agenda. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There was no one in the audience who expressed a desire to address the Board during this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING AND PRESENTATION ON THE CONCEPTUAL PARK DESIGN AND MASTER PLAN FOR THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. (TILE NUMBER AMD-07-15 Mr. McIntosh reviewed that the proposed park site is 5.56 acres, which is comparable to the 5.5 acre Sierra and Sherwood Parks that have served their neighborhoods well since the early 1970's. The property was purchased by the City of Edmonds in September of 2007 with funds from the City Parks Acquisition fund 126. Subsequent to the purchase, the City was Packet Page 239 of 333 awarded grants from Snohomish County ($1,200,000 from builder's mitigation funds) and the State ($500,000 from the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program) for assistance in acquisition. A SPPA checklist was submitted on September 15, 2006 with a Determination of Nonsignificance issued on December 5, 2006, Mr. McIntosh reported that since last fall, the Engineering Division has completed an in-house design of a neighborhood drainage infiltration system to be constructed on site. MIS International was selected as the consultant to provide survey, specifications and project management for the abatement of hazardous materials and removal of underground storage tanks; and Reid Middleton was selected as the consultant to' provide specifications and project management for the building demolition. He further reported that MacLeod Reckord Landscape Architects was selected as the consultant for the master planning and park design, development and project management. The Project Manager for this work is Ed MacLeod. Abatement, demolition and removal of the underground tanks were completed at the end of August and topographical surveying in preparation for grading and infiltration system installation began on September 41h. He noted there were no extraordinary incidences on the site, and the demolition project came in on budget and was completed earlier than anticipated. Mr. McIntosh reviewed that a public meeting was conducted on May 3`d to vision and discuss various features that could be incorporated into the park. At a second public hearing on June 28`r' the consultant presented three possible alternatives that were reviewed and discussed in detail. The conceptual drawing for the neighborhood infiltration system was also reviewed. On July I I d' an update of the progress to that point and the three conceptual alternatives were presented to the Planning/Parks Hoard for review and comment. Mr. McIntosh advised that the purpose of the hearing is to allow the consultant an opportunity to present the Preferred Plan to the Planning/Parks Board and the public. If recommended by the Board, the plan would move on to the City Council for review and an additional public hearing in October. He noted that following approval of the design, engineering level bid documents would be produced with the project going out to bid in late 2007 or early 2008. Mr. McIntosh referred the Board and public to a black and white map of the Preferred Plan. He noted that the plan was based on Alternative C, which seemed to be favored by the public and the Board at previous meetings. Ile advised that the plan includes modifications to both the active and passive recreation areas and incorporates many of the comments and recommendations from the community, staff and consultant. It recommends the inclusion of many features that Mr. MacLeod would elaborate upon in his presentation. Given the increased demand and need for decent playftelds for the younger age group, Mr. McIntosh said they are recommending the ball field be scheduled for spring and fall sports. These seasons would run from late April to mid June and late August until late October and would not include any Sunday play. He said that due to the limited outfield distance of approximately 160 feet as a result of the existing cherry tree, age of play would be limited to younger teams mostly in t-ball, coach pitch and modified soccer. He noted that this recommendation would not replace the two full-sized fields that were previously on the site, but it would help alleviate the overall need in the community, Staff feels there would be ample space available within the park even when the field is in use. Mr. McIntosh advised that the number off-street parking spaces would be increased to 30 compared to the similar sized neighborhood parks at Seaview (36) and Sierra (26) that have scheduled play. Scheduled play also occurs at smaller neighborhood parks; 1.5 acre Pine Street Park and 2.3 acre Anderson Center have limited off-street parking. Mr. McIntosh referred the Board to the attachments that were provided in the staff report, which include the following items: Preferred Plan; July 7, 2007 Planning/Parks Board Memorandum and Minutes; Alternatives A, B, and C; Infiltration Plan Diagram; Determination of Nonsignificance; and SEPA Checklist. He concluded his report by stating that staff plans to conduct a contest to name the new park. Mr. MacLeod provided an enlarged map of the Preferred Plan, He said he found that the public process that was used to create the plan worked well. Input was solicited from the public before any design work was done and the public was invited to comment on the three design alternatives that were created, He explained that the Preferred Plan represents a combination of various aspects from each of the three alternatives. Mr. MacLeod provided pictures to illustrate the existing conditions on the site now that the buildings have been removed. Ile pointed out that the site appears larger now, and the remaining vegetation is easily visible and can be used to define spaces on the site. The Preferred Plan would also utilize the concept of Planning Board Minutes September 12, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 240 of 333 borrowing open space from the Memorial Gardens that is located next door to the south. The effect is to at least visually increase the size of the overall park. lie particularly noted the Cherry Tree that is currently located on the site and emphasized that the remaining vegetation was fenced off to protect it during demolition. He briefly reviewed each of the three alternatives and announced that the Preferred flan incorporates many of the same elements that were included as part of Alternative C. The parking would be located on the east site, with a paved accessible trail system that would loop around the site. While Alternative C did not include a restroom facility, many have indicated their desire for a facility of this type. The Preferred Plan includes a restroom facility as part of the master plan, recognizing that it might not be constructed as part of the earlier phases of construction. In response to concerns raised by the community, the Preferred flan shows the children's play area moved nearer to the more active areas of the park and further from the wood areas. Mr. MacLeod advised that based on comments from the community and the Board, the size of the athletic field was reduced so it would only be suitable for scheduled play for younger children. The proposed distance from home plate to the edge of the outfield would only be 180 feet, so it would not be available for regulation play. There would be paving around the permanent backstop and a skinned infill. Mr. MacLeod referred to the picnic area proposed for the northeast corner and noted that it would be designed as a raised terrace that looks over the green area. The cherry tree and other nice groups of existing trees would be saved as part of the park design. The proposed sport court would be located in the same place as in Alternative C, and the continuous paved loop trail would retain the same route. In response to community input, the trail would be constructed offa soft surface material and would be handicap accessible. Fle recalled the public felt strongly that the trail should provide an opportunity for people to walk through the wooded area, so a woodland path was included in the Preferred Plan without requiring the removal of any existing significant trees. Again, lie noted the playground was moved closer to the parking lot. Mr. MacLeod said that at the public meetings, the community and Board expressed concern that Alternative C did not provide as strong an entry as Alternatives A and B. As a result, the corner entry was reduced to one location with a boardwalk going over a rain garden, which could be used to filter stormwater runoff from the parking lot before it goes to the infiltration system on the west side of the park. lie explained that because the subgrade soil at the park drains well, it is likely they would need to provide some type of irrigation to keep water loving plants in the rain garden healthy during the dry summer months. Mr. MacLeod reviewed the proposed simple design for the rain garden boardwalk, which would be located close to the surface. The boardwalk would provide a nice, welcoming element to the park and set the stage for the passive overall character of the park. Mr. MacLeod briefly described the design for the ball field, which would include a backstop, dug outs, seating, etc. It would be located in the southwest corner of the park. The proposed sport court would be located on the east side of the park next to the parking lot. He emphasized that sport courts are typically well used by children after school, and the proposed court would include small walls to help contain the balls and provide secondary seating. A restroom facility was included near the proposed parking lot and sport court. Rather than an angle parking configuration near the plaza, the area would be used as a drop off and a kiosk and bench area would provide a safe place for children to wait for adults to pick them up. Mr. MacLeod advised that the primary children's play area was moved from the northwest corner to closer to the more active areas. The plan envisions this area to be a standard play area with concrete edging and handicap access. The City would likely consider the newer styles of play equipment that stress interactive play. The play area would also include a swing set and a climbing rock element, which would be popular with children of all ages. Mr. MacLeod said that moving north from the play area, the pathway would lead to the plaza and picnic shelter. The pathway would also allow a person to bypass the shelter and continue on the loop pathway. He described the design elements that would be part of the proposed shelter. Picnic tables and benches would be provided under the shelter, as well as in the plaza area. The design would be indigenous to the character of the Woodway area, and additional plantings would be provided along the trail, as well as bench seating, lie noted that loop walkways tend to be popular park attractions, particularly when there are choices that can vary the distance and destination. Mr. MacLeod provided a diagram to highlight the wooded loop system. He explained that the City staff has met with the developer of the adjacent property to discuss the potential of having a loop trail through the wooded area that is owned by the i Planning Board Minutes September 127 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 241 of 333 developer. The developer has expressed an interest in deeding this portion of the property back to the City so it could become and open space area of the park. However, this concept is purely speculation at this point since no commitment has been made on the part of the developer. If an agreement of this type cannot be reached, the wooded area would still remain as open space, but the loop path would connect back into the paved pathway earlier, resulting in a shorter loop. lie noted that a PAR Course has been proposed along the soft surface track. This would provide different configurations of exercise stations and is a good way to augment jogging and walking along the loop trail. Roger Ilertrich, Edmonds, said lie was unable to attend the previous public meetings related to the park design, but he has been involved in several discussions in regards to parks in southwest Edmonds. He cautioned that the Board should be interested in what has transpired in regard to Burnstead's proposed PRD development next to the new park. While the developer's studies of' the treed area within the proposed PRD property indicated there were no Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Afeas or critical areas on the site, he questioned who did the study and what areas were studied when making the determination. The City allowed the PRD project to move forward based on this determination, but their approval was appealed to the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner expressed concern that the information that was used to make the SEPA Determination was inaccurate. She indicated the City and the applicant failed to provide adequate documentation regarding the impacts to the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, which is located in the area where the park trail is currently proposed. Mr. i-iertrich noted that the developer and the City staff spent a short time at the site before determining there were no critical areas or specific wildlife on the endangered list. Since that time, however, there has been much testimony about the endangered palliated woodpeckers that live in the area. He expressed concern that if the wooded area is a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, then it should be fenced off to protect against intrusion. The proposed soft surface pathway through the wooded area would be in direct conflict with what should be done with a fragile area of this type. He suggested that before the Park Board makes any recommendation regarding the park design, they should hire a qualified professional to identify all the specific conditions that exist in the area before a walkway or public intrusion is considered. Mr. 1-lertrich expressed his concern that there is already a significant drainage problem in the area. At this time, the property owners must depend on infiltration to capture and drain stormwater runoff. Whenever additional facilities are developed in a location such as this, it is critical to provide a method for detaining and managing the water. However, the Preferred Plan does not address this problem. lie emphasized that the drainage and flooding problems must be addressed before any additional development is allowed to occur. Mr. Hertrich questioned the need to construct a permanent restroom facility in a park the size of the one being proposed. I -le said he is not against the construction of a new restroom facility, but the City should not dedicate a lot of space in the park for this purpose. He noted that, typically, the City brings in sanicans during the busy months. He said lie would be opposed to creating yet another impervious surface in space that could be used for children to play. Lora Petso, Edmonds, pointed out that the proposed drainage facility appears to be located on the Burnstead's property to the west of the proposed park. She expressed her concern that this could result in substantial maintenance problems if the facility is located underneath homes. She said it is her understanding that in order to properly maintain a drainage facility, the City must be able to get a vactor truck to the site. Therefore, the new drainage facility should be located in an area where maintenance could occur with minimal disturbance. She urged the Board to not only consider the park design aspect of the project, but also ask details about the drainage portion of the project. Ms. Petso advised that because the park would be designed to a serve a radius of greater than one mile, it could not be considered a neighborhood park and would not be allowed in the proposed location without a conditional use permit or a park master plan. She suggested it would be appropriate for the Park Hoard to consider the project as a conditional use permit and place restrictions in the Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Plan to limit its use and protect the surrounding property owners. For example, it would be appropriate to require the City to provide adequate parking if a scheduled ball field is constructed. If the parking lot can only accommodate enough cars for one game at a time, then back-to-back games should be prohibited. Planning Board Minutes September 12, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 242 of 333 Ms. Petso said that although the proposed PRD development has not been approved, it appears the homes on the north side of the development would not be adequately buffered from the ball field. Fowl balls could easily go into the homes. In addition, the. perimeter trail would only be 17 feet from the windows of the new homes. She suggested that perhaps a ball field on this small park would not be practical. Ms. Petso noted that the trees on the northern portion of the property have been identified as a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area. Therefore, the picnic shelter and the spiral stone element should be moved away from this area. If the City does decides to move forward with the ball field even if it would be too small or too close to the houses, they should at least provide a safety fence. Perhaps they should provide less parking and only schedule the ball field for practices. She concluded her remarks by stating that she would provide additional written comments to the Board prior to the end of the meeting. Steve Bernheim, Edmonds, said he likes the idea of having long open spaces where kids can expand their imaginations and play various games and sports. He said he would be opposed to a formal ball field on the park site. He would prefer to see a grassy undeveloped neighborhood park with less parking and more pedestrian access. While public restrooms would be a positive amenity, perhaps they would be too expensive and take up too much space for this small sized park. Again, he said he would like the park to remain as a neighborhood park and minimize the organized sports aspect. Rick Good, Edmonds, said he lives near the proposed new park and has attended the planning meetings and seen the different alternatives. He expressed his belief that the Preferred Plan appears to be going in the right direction. However, encouraging people to go back into the wooded areas could create problems. He expressed concern that the ball field is not the right use for the park, either. The existing neighborhood is not developed sufficiently to handle the additional traffic associated with a ball field. He noted that problems already exist as a result of the Klahaya "Dennis and Swim Club's summer activities. He suggested that perhaps it would be better to construct another picnic area instead of the ball field. He concurred with Ms. Petso's comment that no back-to-back games should be scheduled on the small field. He expressed his concern that allowing scheduled games would make the park a destination park rather than a neighborhood park. He agreed the sport court would be heavily used and should be part of the park design. He said he knows that drainage is a huge issue in the area, but the City has already removed all of the buildings and concrete from the site, and the buildings would be replaced with grass that would act as a natural filtration system. Therefore, the situation should improve. Kevin Clarke, Edmonds, said he often has a private waterfront estate as a result of the drainage problems that exist in the area. He said he lives at the southwest corner of Woodway Meadows, which is accessed via 237"' Street. The property owners in this neighborhood are concerned about drainage and have been working with the City for many years to resolve the problems. The infiltration system in their subdivision failed years ago, and they now have significant flooding issues. He explained that, currently, stormwater runoff comes from the east and flows to the west until it reaches the intersection of 1040' and 237"' Street where it floods every time it rains. The neighbor directly to the east of the park entrance often has a puddle in front of his home that is so large he cannot park his car on that side of the street. The catch basin in the school parking lot is often blocked and the whole intersection floods. During severe stones the water flows west and southwest and ends up in the cul-de-sac near his property. Mr. Clarke expressed his desire that the City provide some guarantee to the property owners surrounding the park that the drainage problers would be resolved by the proposed new infiltration system. This means they must collect all of the water coming from the east and from the ball fields and direct it to the new system. He said he is also concerned about the drainage impacts associated with the proposed PRD development. Mr. Clarke pointed out that, currently, there are no parking signs on the north side of 237`t' Street, but people using the school property and the Klahaya "Dennis and Swim Club always park on the street during scheduled events. This presents a problem for residents who are trying to exit the subdivision. He suggested the City provide more signage to designate the street as no parking on the north side, and the rules should be enforced. Mr. Clarke said he loves the area and believes the proposed park plan is good. The park would be a great amenity for the community, but the City must address the issues of traffic and parking. When the Klahaya Tennis and Swim Club holds their Planning BOW Minutes Septeinber 12, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 243 of 333 swim meets four or five times a year, cars line up all along the streets in the area. This is an incredible invasion of parking for the neighborhood. Mr. Clarke said lie is also concerned about the small band of wooded area. lie noted that a small easement area is located behind his house to provide access to the storage tanks. In order for the neighborhood to be constructed, the developer was required to pave the emergency access point. Teenagers often hang out in this area and drink, and this saute situation could be true for the panhandle of wooded area that is proposed as part of the park plan. Mr. Clarke concluded that most of the people in the neighborhood are excited about the proposed new park, and they are grateful for what the City has done. lie said he likes the proposed new design, but asked that it be fine tuned to ensure they do not have any regrets in the future. Colin Southcote-Want, Edmonds, said he attended both of the initial park planning meetings, and he is excited about the proposed new park. However, he is concerned that a sport field is still part of the Preferred flan when nearly everybody at the public meetings voiced their opposition to the concept. lie said lie is also very concerned about the impacts the proposed park would have on the designated Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area. lie asked that the Board consider moving all of the park facilities away from this area so it can be preserved. Mr. Southcote-Want noted that the PRD project has not received final approval yet. Therefore, he suggested it would be premature for the City to make a final decision regarding the park's design. It appears that the proposed buffer between the PRD development and the park would be located on City property. He suggested it would be more appropriate for the PRD developer to provide a buffer on his property that could add extra space to the park, He urged the Board to postpone their recommendation to the City Council until the PRD issues have been decided. Jennifer Gill, Edmonds, said she is concerned about the Preferred Plant for the proposed new park. She encouraged the Board to step back and look at the view from a wider range to see how the proposal would result in two large neighborhoods connected by a very small park. Before the Board makes a recommendation regarding the park design, she suggested they address the drainage issue. She said it is too early to talk about plans for the park before they have determined the drainage impacts associated with the project. Ms. Gill expressed her belief that a small park between two neighborhoods should not bring in activities that result in a lot of noise. No matter what kind of sport field is provided, it should be noted that only one person at one public meeting indicated support for this type of facility. She concluded that most people do not want a ball field, and she questioned which demographic the ball field would satisfy. She asked if it is the City's intent to make the park a destination park. She said she would like the park design to eliminate many of the elements such as the ball field. In addition, the City should attempt to provide as much pervious ground as possible by reducing the number of parking spaces and using pervious materials. A concrete sidewalk would be okay, but the Board should note that there are no other sidewalks in the neighborhood. Ms. Gill suggested the plaza area and sport court should be eliminated from the design, as well. Site noted there are plenty of bail fields around for children and adults to use. Because this is a very small park, the City should expand on the way the park is already set up to provide space for picnics, open fields for non -organized activities, and a place for people to walk their dogs. She asked if the City plans to allow dogs in the new park, particularly those that are off ]cash. Roll Trahnis, Edmonds, said be also attended both planning meetings for the park. lie expressed his belief that the City has a great need for more playfields. He noted that when the park was going to be t I acres, it would have been more appropriate for full sized playfields, but providing a playfield that would only serve half a purpose does not make sense. Instead, the park should be developed as a general green space that allows the neighborhood to creatively use the park. Matt Hanby, Edmonds, noted that the old Woodway Elementary School site originally had two sport fields. lie said he feels strongly that the new park should at least include a small sport field. lie said there appears to be a number of voices suggesting the City create a park that would be utilized by only a few people. Even with the proposed new infrastructure, small kids would be bored within a short period of time. This would result in a park for mostly adults, and that appears to be the intent of many of the previous speakers. He emphasized that the real need in the community is for sport fields for children to play on. Many of the local groups that provide these activities for children can testify to a tremendous lack of fields and 1 Planning Board Minutes Septemhcr t 2, 2007 Page G Packet Page 244 of 333 that the demand would continue to increase. He pointed out that most of the people who support more sport fields in the City are out coaching and taking care of their families, making it difficult for thern to come to the public meetings. He urged the Board to contact Sno King and other youth organizations regarding the need for more space for kids to play ball. The smaller fields can serve the younger children so the larger fields could be opened to adults and older children. He urged the Board to approve the proposed plan in order to help meet this need. Heather Marks, Edmonds, submitted some handouts of information that has been presented over the course of working to get the park design ready. She pointed out that the first three pages are from a presentation that was done at a Southwest Edmonds Neighborhood Association meeting, where Mr. McIntosh talked to them about how they could work together to create the park design. The presentation talked about how the City of Seattle has developed parks through neighborhood partnerships. She referred to a book that was written by Jim Diers from the University of Washington. The book describes how a community worked with the City of Seattle to design Bradner Park to include the features they wanted for their neighborhood. She noted that Bradner Park is an award winning park and much of the work was done by the community. She urged the Board to keep in mind that having the citizens involved from the beginning enabled this group to leverage $1 million to help develop the park. She provided pictures of a bathroom facility that was constructed in the park using broken dishes and glass. The community and City of Seattle understood that if everyone was involved in the project, it would not be vandalized. She quoted the following from Mr. Diers, "Neighborhood improvements are more likely to be sustained when ideas and actions come from within the community and build local capacity." Ms. Marks expressed her concern that the Preferred Plan was created by a person who does not even live in Edmonds. The Southwest Edmonds Neighborhood Association did not hear anything from the designer other than what was presented at the two public meetings. Again, she noted that only one person at the two public meetings indicated a desire for a formalized sport field. She noted, in fact, that Mr. Macleod originally indicated that the park was too small for a formal sport field, but someone appears to have leaned on hirn to get him to change his mind and include a ball field. Ms. Marks provided a picture of a woman walking her dog and pushing a stroller, which she took just prior to the meeting. The woman indicated she used to walk her dog on the playfield, but this is no longer possible. She now has to run along 248`h Street with the dog and stroller, and this is a dangerous situation. She indicated she has already had a few close calls and was almost assaulted earlier in the summer while walking in the cemetery. The people in the community who used to use the park now have to go elsewhere to continue their regular activities. Ms. Marks referred the Board to information she provided regarding an organization in Seattle that purchases school properties and other properties in Seattle. With the help of the community, they have been able to create wonderful parks. This saves the City of Seattle a lot of money and results in parks that fit within the character of the neighborhoods. Ms. Marks recalled there has been significant discussion about the critical areas in or near the park. She suggested the Board and staff carefully review the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Chapter 23.90 states, "No development shall be allowed within a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area or buffer in which threatened or endangered species have primary location except as provided for by a management plan established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or applicable State Agency. Approval of alteration of land of a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area or its buffer shall .not occur without consultation with the Department of Fish and Wildlife." She noted that the pilliated woodpecker is on the State's list of species on the boarder line for extinction. She said that while a trail would be great, it would destroy the habitat for the woodpecker and other species, and this impact must be dealt with. She urged the Board to adhere by the City's own codes. Ms. Marks expressed her belief that children need unstructured places to play in the park. Children are much too controlled and they need a place to come up with their own ideas for play. She urged the Board to think carefully before making any decisions. She further suggested that it would be appropriate for the Board to allow the Southwest Edmonds Neighborhood Association an opportunity to sign off on the final plan. Colin Sandwith, Edmonds, said lie originally encouraged the City to purchase the entire school property and keep the two existing ball fields. He suggested there must be some compromise regarding ball fields because it is important not to forget about what the children need. They need a place for constructive play, including ball fields. If they are going to play ball at planning Board Mimctes September 12, 2007 page 7 Packet Page 245 of 333 the park, then the City should provide a restroor for their use. He noted that the proposed plan does not include any information regarding lighting and security for the park. lie expressed his belief that without proper lighting, development of the park could provide a place for teenagers to hang out at night. This could result in problems at the park. THE PUBLIC PORTION Or THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. McIntosh thanked the citizens who participated in the public hearing and provided the following feedback to the concerns raised: + Fish and Wildlife habitat Conservation Area. Mr. McIntosh said the park property is identified on the City's map as a Fish and Wildlife habitat Conservation Area. The boundary around the top end of the proposed new park is exactly the sarne as the boundaries around 10 or 12 other City parks that have active play areas and pathways. The City does not restrict people from going into these areas, and he would hate to have the wooded area at the new park off limits. Ile suggested that perhaps this issue has been overplayed. • Restrooms. Mr. McIntosh advised that the City typically provides sanicans during the busy season in most parks where playfields are located. This is an advantage for the City because they can contract the service out without using a lot of park maintenance resources. He said a restroom would be a nice addition to the park and should be included in the park's master plan, but it is not a necessity for organized play in a park of this size. If the park becomes more heavily used, then a bathroom facility could be considered. + infiltration System. Mr. McIntosh announced that the infiltration system would be constructed prior to any park development. While the drainage facility could be constructed anywhere on the park site except under the parking area, staff understands that access is a concern. Staff is proposing that the facility be placed near the northwest corner of the ball field in an area that could be easily accessed by maintenance trucks. Buffering of Homes on the West Side of the Park. Mr. McIntosh emphasized that the Board is only responsible for reviewing the proposed park plan, and not the proposed PRD. The developer would be required to address the buffering requirements associated with his project. however, he noted that stray balls are typically not a problem at any of their parks, and he doesn't anticipate a problem at the new park, either. The proposed ball field would be used by children between the ages of 5 and 9, and they are not going to hit long foul balls that go over the fence and trees and into neighboring yards. They generally use a softer ball, as well. • The Park is Too Small. Mr. McIntosh reminded the Board that there are other neighborhood parks in the City that are similar in size or smaller, and they have ball fields similar to what is being proposed for the new park. Ile said he coached little league for 35 years, and he particularly likes to coach the younger kids because they are out to just have fun. However, they tend to get the bottom of the barrel as far as field scheduling goes. Thee younger children would be the sole users of the new field, and lie sees a vast need for this type of facility in the community, as a whole. • Problems Associated with the Wooded Panhandle Area. Mr, McIntosh said he can understand the neighbors' concerns. Ile recalled that when the City originally considered the park design, it did not include the panhandle because it seemed too remote. It would be great to have the extra trail through the wooded area, but the Parks Department wouldn't be opposed to excluding it so they don't have to police and maintain the area because it is isolated and far away from the remainder of the park. Ile cautioned against targeting teens as the only ones who create problems in parks. All undesirables should not be lumped into the category of teens. • Dogs in the Park. Mr. McIntosh said the City would welcome dogs on leashes in the new park. There are eight other parks in the City that are designated the same and welcome responsible dog owners. However, they will not tolerate off leash dogs in the new park because children and dogs in the same park is not a good mix. • Lighting and Security. Mr. McIntosh said lie has discussed the issue of lighting and security with the design consultant. However, these issues would not be fully addressed in the plan until the final design phase, lie noted they would propose Planning Board Minutes September 12, 2007 Page 8 Packet Page 246 of 333 perimeter lighting around the park that follows the paved loop trail. Many people like to use the park for exercise during the morning and evening hours when it is dark during the winter. The lighting would be on a timer so it would turn off at a given time at night and turn on again in the morning. In addition, 24-hour security lighting would be provided in the area of the picnic shelter and restroom facility because these areas typically experience a lot of vandalism. The lighting would assist the police department when driving through the parking lot to see undesirable activities. The lighting would be low level and would not attract people to recreate alter hours. Drainage. Mr. McIntosh pointed out that construction of the park elements would result in a significant reduction of impervious surface, Replacing the asphalt and buildings with grass would allow for infiltration of stormwater runoff. The park would to its part to reduce the drainage problers in the community. There is also an opportunity to consider green roofs and other elements. In addition, the new infiltration system would handle any water coming from the walkway and parking areas. Staff does not envision any water falling on new impervious surfaces ever leaving the park site. In addition, the rain garden would clean up the water coming from the parking lot before it goes into the infiltration system. Mr. Fiene explained that the new infiltration facility would be a regional drainage system that has been planned as part of the Edmonds Southwest Basin Study. He explained that when the area was annexed into the City in 1995, the stormwater drainage situation was a mess. Since that time, the City has constructed about 12 new systems with good success. The park drainage, as well as the stormwater runoff coming from properties to the east would be taken care by the proposed new system. Hoard Member heed inquired if this project was identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Fiene answered affirmatively. The project is scheduled to start in late 2007 and would be completed in early 2008. Chair Guenther explained that there are two ways to treat stormwater runoff. infiltration and retention. Mr. Piene said that, typically, infiltration systems are not feasible in Edmonds. However, this is one area where there are few choices for connecting into other systems. The City has had to spend twice as much money to address drainage in this area of the City, Fortunately, the soils that exist in the area are conducive to infiltration, which is not the case in most other areas of the City where they have to use a retention and slow release system. Mr. Fiene concluded that replacing the structures and asphalt with grass fields would help, but the new system would take care of the area to the east, as well as the park. Board Member Works asked how often the City has to access infiltration systems for maintenance purposes. Mr. Fiene answered that the code requires maintenance to occur on a yearly basis. The City of Folmonds is actually ahead of other cities in this regard. Board Member Works asked if green roofs would help significantly. Mr. Fiene answered affirmatively and suggested the City could study the affect of how well this type of roof would operate. Board Member Works also inquired about whether or not it would be possible to use pervious surface materials in the parking lot and on the pathways, Mr. Fiene agreed this would be another concept to study. Board Member Works suggested that perhaps this park could be used as a study area for the rest of the City to learn how well pervious materials and other green concepts work. Board Member Freeman suggested it would also be appropriate to consider the benefits of using pervious surface materials for the shelter and plaza areas. Mr. Fiene said that while the City Code does not require pervious surface, it would be appropriate for the City to consider these options. Board Member Henderson asked if there was ever a determination that the panhandle is habitat for pilliated woodpeckers. Mr. McIntosh said there is no doubt the birds have been in the area, but there are no studies that identify the area as a specific habitat for the woodpeckers. Board Member Reed asked staff to provide direction as to whether or not it would be appropriate for the Board to let the PRD process run its course before making a recommendation. Mr. Bowman explained that the PRD issue is entirely separate from the park design proposal. The developer of the PRD must comply with the code requirements, and the Hearing Examiner has resolved issues related to the northeast corner portion of his property. The only issue remaining is related to the perimeter buffering. Again, lie clarified that the Board could move forward with their recommendation regarding the proposed park design now because it is not dependent on the PRD proposal. Board Member Reed asked whose responsibility it is to deal with the parking problems that surround the park. Mr. Bowman answered that this is an enforcement issue and regulated by the police department. If no parking areas are established by code, the police department can write citations when violations occur. 1 , e Planning Board Minutes September 12, 2007 Page 9 Packet Page 247 of 333 Chair Guenther clarified that, at this time, the Hoard is only considering a master plan for the park to identify all of the desired elements. Issues related to traffic and parking are not typically addressed during this phase of the project. The same is true for the restroomn. The master plan could identify a location for the restroom, but it doesn't mean a restroom would ultimately be constructed. While sorne elements of the plan would be built soon, others would not be added until a future date, if at all. Board Member Freeman questioned if the master plan could identify a priority list to identify which elements would be constructed first, She also suggested the master plan could note the concerns raised regarding the trail through the wooded area, and require that these concerns be satisfactorily addressed before the trail construction could take place. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED FOR BOARD DELIBERATION. Board Mernber Young commented that the Preferred Plan was put together well, and staff provided adequate justification for the half dozen points that were raised by the public. He summarized that there is no issue related to the area being designated as a Dish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, and concerns related to drainage would be resolved by the new infiltration system. Issues related to traffic and parking would be resolved as the plan evolves. He said he believes the proposed sport field is appropriate given the sire and location of the park. While he is interested in learning the final outcome of the PRD proposal, it is not something that is within the Board's purview to consider. He said he would support the Preferred Plan as presented because the issues raised by the public have all been addressed by the staff with the possible exception of the parking situation, and the park is not the only place in town where parking problems exist. Board Member Works indicated her support for the Preferred Plan. She agreed that more play space is needed for small children, however, she said she has concerns about the proposed trail through the wooded area. She recommended this element be studied further to address issues related to security. She said she would like the park to become a demonstration site for applying pervious surfaces and green elements. Board Member- Freeman said she supports the Preferred Plan, too. She recalled that she previously raised concerns about safety issues associated with the loop trail, but these would be dealt with in the future when that particular element is being considered for implementation. She said while she can understand the neighbors' concerns about the sport field, she felt it important to provide sport facilities for the younger children. Board Member Bowman said lie is very much in support of the Preferred Plan, He agreed that there is currently a significant drainage problem in the area, but the new infiltration system should resolve the situation. As a coach, he said he knows the proposed field would be more than adequate for small children playing t-ball, etc. I-!e encouraged those who are against the playfield to go and watch the young children play ball. Board Member Reed said he does not see the park as being conducive to having a ball field. The field would be used a significant amount of time in the summer and would make a problem situation even worse. The street surrounding the park and the parking area would not be adequate to accommodate the increased use. He said that while there are a lot of good ideas in the plan, Ire would rather see a less formal playfield that could be used for practices. Board Member Reed also expressed concern that Ire does not understand all of the issues related to the wooded area known as the panhandle and whether or not it is a fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area. When the plan moves forward to the City Council, he suggested staff provide more information about the impacts the proposed trail would have on the habitat. He said he would support the Preferred Plan, with those two qualifications. Board Member Henderson said he, too, is concerned about the habitat in the panhandle area. 'ro be more reassured, it would have been helpful for staff to provide a biologist's study to support the plan. However, because it might be years before the trail is developed, it is not a critical issue right now. Board Member Henderson said he would not be in favor of constructing a permanent backstop on the ball field. Something smaller and more portable in nature could be used instead. lie agreed that smaller children need to have a decent place to play, but that doesn't require a permanent, concrete backstop. He said he would support a motion to move the plan along. Chair Guenther indicated his support for the Preferred Plan, noting that staff and the consultant addressed all of the issues raised by the public. lie noted that the restroom facility would not likely be developed a part of the first phase of the project. Planning Board Minutes Seplember 12, 2007 Page 10 Packet Page 248 of 333 Ile also noted that Mr_Fiene addressed infiltration and drainage issues adequately, indicating that the soils in the area would absorb much of the stormwater. Ile said he sees a need for additional playfields in the City, particularly since this one would be for the smaller children and not heavily used, Chair Guenther pointed out that many other parks in the City have Nish and Wildlife Ilabitat Conservation Areas on their perimeter and within the parks, as well, Ile said pilliated woodpeckers fly around his neighborhood, too, and they seem to coexist well with the residents. Ile said he plans to support the plan as proposed. BOARD MEMBER YOUNG MOVED THAT THE 130ARD FORWARD THE PREFERRED PLAN FOR THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY PARK MASTER PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR ALL OF THE REASONS LISTED ON THE RECORD, BOARD MEMBER WORKS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-1, WITH BOARD MEMBER REED VOTING IN OPPOSITION 13ASED ON HIS EARLIER COMMENTS. I'll E BOARD TOOK A BREAK AT 9:20 P.M. T14EY RECONVENED TIlE MEETING AT 9:35 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECD CHAPTER 17.40 (FILE NUMBER AMD-07-14 Mr, Bowman advised that sorne Board Members identified changes that were supposed to have been incorporated into the new draft document, but were not. Ile suggested the Board continue the public hearing to September 26"'. In the meantime, staff would make the changes and include Steve Waite's written comments on behalf of the I-listoric Preservation Commission, as well. BOARD MEMBER YOUNG MOVED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ECDC 17.40 (FILE NUMBER AMD-07-14) BE CONTINUED TO THE SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 MEETING. BOARD MEMBER HENDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION, THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Bowman indicated that the new draft document, along with a copy of Mr. Waite's comments would be provided to the Board prior to the September 26"' meeting. PUBLIC HEARING ON APPLICATION TO REZONE PROPERTIES LOCATED. AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EDMONDS WAY AND 236"' STREET SOUTHWEST FROM NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS BN TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS----EDMONDS WAY BLEW FILE NUMBER R-07-53 Board Member Guenther reminded the Board of the Appearance of fairness Rules. None of the Board Members disclosed ex parse communications, and no one in the audience expressed a concern, either. Ms. Coccia referred the Board to the staff report. She advised that the applicant is requesting to rezone property on the south side ol' 236"' Street Southwest and the east side of Edmonds Way from Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business - Edmonds Way (BC -I W). The site is approximately 0.60 acres in size and has about 210 feet of frontage along Edmonds Way and about 160 feet of frontage along 236`'' Street Southwest. The eastern parcel is undeveloped. While the western parcel is currently vacant, it had previously been developed with a self -serve diesel gas station. Ms. Coccia reviewed the six criteria that must be considered when reviewing an application for a rezone. She noted that the staff report provides a response to each of the criteria. She said staff agrees with the materials and narrative provided by the applicant. In addition, the application was routed through various City departments and divisions, and no comments were received. No public comments were received, but one person did request to become a party of record. Based on the findings of I�act, analysis, conclusions and attachments in the staff report, Ms. Coccia advised that staff recommends the Planning Board forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the requested rezone to BC-EW. Planning Board Minrttes September 12, 2007 Page I I Packet Page 249 of 333 CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES July 11, 2007 Chair Guenther called the regular meeting of the Planning Board to order at 7:03 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5'1' Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Cary Guenther, Chair Janice Freeman Jim Young Don Henderson Judith Works Michael Bowman John Reed BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT John Dewhirst, Vice Chair READINGIAPPROVAL Or MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Brian McIntosh, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBER FREEMAN MOVED 'THAT THE MINUTES OF ,JUNE 27, 2007 BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER WORKS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, WITH BOARD MEMBER GUI NTHER ABSTAINING. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA No changes were made to the agenda. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Colin Southeote-Want noted that later in the meeting the Board would receive an update on the old Woodway Elementary School Park development. He asked the Board to pay particular attention to the proposed parking situation. He said lie recently visited Sierra Park and Seaview Park, which are comparable in size to the old Woodway Elementary School site. He noted that Sierra Park has 26 off-street parking spaces and 4 spaces on the street. 'There are 26 off-street parking spaces at Seaview Park, with additional parking available on the street. He expressed concern that the proposal currently being considered for the new park would only provide 12 to 16 parking spaces, yet it also proposes the development of at least one sports field, lie asked the Board to carefully consider the significant number of parking spaces that would be necessary in order to accommodate a sports field. Heather Marks expressed concern about the types of uses that are being proposed for the new park. She provided some pictures to illustrate how the property is currently being used, including exercising, walking dogs, baseball and soccer practice, model airplane flying, unstructured play and meeting others in the community. She expressed her desire that the new Packet Page 250 of 333 park acconnmodate the activities that already occur rather than creating an overly structured park. She said her preference for design would be Alternative C, but there must be changes to how the trees are dealt with. She asked that the City staff provide information to cleanly identify why trees have to be removed. She pointed out that if some of the trees are removed, the others may become more susceptible to damage or falling down. She summarized that it would be wonderful to have picnic tables under the trees in a park setting. She said it is important that the City save as many of the trees as possible. It is also important that the City listen to the public's desire to have a park that is less structured with more options for what it can be used for. Don Krieman said lie has ridden his bicycle past the Old Woodway Elementary School site for several years. Right not, the site is in a dilapidated condition. It is dangerous, unsightly and underutilized. He noted that during previous discussions, the public seems to have forgotten that parks are for children. It is important that people who live near the park can see children playing across the street. He said he does not care whether sports fields are provided at the park or not, but the property needs to be redeveloped so it can be used by the community as a place for children to play. It is also important that the project be completed as soon as possible. Jennifer Gill pointed out that there would be no on -street parking available near the new park site. She recalled that when the park was first proposed, the City was considering the option of developing sports fields. However, the current park size is half as large as what was originally considered. The City sold half of the property, and now they are considering the development of sports fields in a relatively small amount of space. She expressed her belief that it would not be appropriate to develop multiple uses in such a small park. Ms. Gill pointed out that the City has not conducted any surveys to identify the existing demographics of the surrounding neighborhoods. However, theEdmonds School District has some information that identifies the percentage of people in the area with and without children. She encouraged the Board to carefully consider the size of the proposed new park and be realistic about the uses that are being planned. UPDATE ON OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARK DEVELOPMENT Mr. McIntosh introduced Ed MacLeod from the landscape architecture and park planning firm of MacLeod Reckord, who was hired by the City to do toaster planning, park design, and construction administration for the Old Woodway Elementary School site. He reported that at the first public meeting on May 3"', staff provided a list of amenities that could go into a neighborhood park and the public was invited to share their vision for the new park. From that meeting, the consultant created three alternatives that were presented to the public on June 28"'. He advised that Mn MacLeod would present the three alternatives to the Board and solicit their input and comments. Ed MacLeod, MacLeod Reckord, displayed the three design alternatives for the Old Woodway Elementary School Park Development. He explained that the designs were prepared after significant input from the community at two public meetings. At the first meeting, they provided information to the public about what they knew about the property. The public provided additional information about traffic, pedestrian safety and park access. He said they also gathered ideas from the public about the types of activities that should be provided at the park, and hoer much parking should be provided. From this discussion, lie prepared a list of possible park features that could be considered for the site. The list included the following: • Youth Athletic Facilities, City staff indicated there is a shortage of sports fields in terms of the broader community, and the property would offer an opportunity for this type of use. The question is how formal the sports field should be. • Multi -Purpose Lawn Area. This space would be in addition to the space that is used for scheduled athletic events such as informal Frisbee throwing, walking dogs, etc. • Open Meadow Area. Perhaps this area wouldn't be mowed as often as other areas of the park, and wild flowers, etc. could be planted to give it a meadow appearance. Trails could also be constructed throughout the meadow. • Accessible Loop Walkway. This is something the community and staff both felt would be important to provide at the new park, preferably with a variety of routes. • Woodland Pathways. • Children's Play Area. 'Phis could be a formal play area with a special surface and catalog play equipment or it could be a more natural setting such as logs, boulders, and other naturalistic play things. ktS1�1 �. Planaing Board Packet Page 251 of 333 • Picnic Sl►elter. A picnic shelter at this site could be well used by the conununity as an open air meeting space. • Restroom. Typically, neighborhood parks do not have restroom facilities and significant parking. However, they don't typically have scheduled athletic fields at neighborhood parks, either. If the park is big enough to accommodate ball fields, they should also provide sufficient parking and a restroom facility, as well. Restrooms could wait until a later phase, but they should plan for them in the future. • Community Gathering Place. • Park Course. This could be a pathway with activity and exercise stations along the way. • Frontage Improvements. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks should be provided on both sides of the street frontage to improve pedestrian safety. • Kiosk. This type of facility could be used to keep the community up to date about what is going in their neighborhood. • Planting and Irrigation. The existing plants and trees should be preserved wherever possible, and new plantings should be added to make the park a beautiful place. • I..ow Impact Development. This concept was mentioned at tine public meeting as something tine City should strive for. The site has been selected for an infiltration system for the neighborhood, and the first component will be located five or six feet underground so they can develop almost anything on top except parking. This infiltration system could provide a place to collect all of the park's storm water runoff, • Community Art Project. Tile City is soliciting ideas from people in the com inunity who can provide craft opportunities in the park such as crafting tiles, etc. This would allow an opportunity for the community to place their unique signature on the park. Mr. MacLeod referred to the three design alternatives and explained that they tried to work around the existing trees. However, they found it would be better to remove some of them to accommodate specific features in the new park. lie advised that he worked with an arborist to inventory the trees and provide a report on their health. The arborist recommended that several trees they had hoped to save should be retnoved as part of the demolition. However, much of the vegetation would be retain to protect the character of the park, particularly the band of existing woodland. In addition, they might want to remove some of the invasive species in the woodland, but the plan is to enhance and maintain it because it fortes a good buffer for the single-family residential properties along the edge of the park property. He noted that the trees that line the existing parking island and the street would be retained and they would provide infill, as well. Tine beautiful flowering cherry tree sets in an awkward place, but they have tried to accommodate it in two of the alternatives. Mr. MacLeod reviewed the three alternatives as follows: • Alternative A --- This alternative is the most formal and urban plan. A primary promenade would start at the entry at the corner and continue into the center of the park to a plaza in the vicinity of the existing cherry tree, a children's play area and a sports field. There would be room in the outfield of the ball field for modified soccer. The pathway would continue around the parking with the restroom between the parking area and the various activities. A small plaza with a picnic shelter and tables and benches would be provided as part of this alternative. To the north, space could be carved out of the hillside to create a bench -high wall to accommodate a sport court. The pathway would continue into the wooded area and then back to the entrance of the park. There may be an opportunity to work with the developer of the adjacent Planned Residential Development (PRD) to provide secondary access points for the park. Parking would be located on the existing site, utilizing a one-way system. Alternative B -- In this alternative, parking; would be located in Elie same area, and the wooded area would be preserved. In addition, the existing large birch and white pine would be preserved, but the cherry tree would have to be moved to a new location. A drop off point would be located in the parking lot so there would be four fewer parking spaces. From the drop off location, a pathway would lead to a more naturally formed play area and picnic shelter. Alternatives A and B would both provide open space, which is something the community isvery interested in having. He suggested the park is big enough for both an organized sports field and an open space park. When there are no scheduled events, there would be a larger open space for the community to enjoy. • Alternative C — The neighborhood community appeared to favor this alternative, which would require more grading to manipulate the contours so ire play area is not at different heights. The back stop for the informal sports field would be �. Planning Board Minutes July 11,2007 Page 3 Packet Page 252 of 333 pushed back. The parking lot was revised to bring the drop off point to the north end, which is closer to the picnic shelter on the edge of the woodland area. It was pointed out that this could result in stacking people coming from the street so it might be better to move it further to the south. Grading would create a Iow area in the site to allow the cherry and white pine tree to be on a knoll. The play area and entry would be at a lower grade than the parking area. This plan suggests a soft surface pathway through the woodland, but the community has indicated they want all of the walkway to be accessible and they would prefer it not have a soft surface. He suggested that a distinction could be made between the formal pathways throughout the park and the asphalt pathway through the wooded area. The stonmwater runoff from the site could be filtered through a rain garden systern before it is discharged into the bioswale. This could occur in the low corner of the site. Mr. MacLeod explained that members of the community expressed concern that if the property line is fenced along the forested area, people could feel unsafe using the wooded area. Alternative C shows this area as native woodland without invited access and trails, but a number of people have indicated they want to use the wooded area as part of the park. Therefore, lie suggested they extend the pathway back into the wooded area. Board Member Freeman noted that no restroom is shown in Alternative C. She noted that if they are going to provide picnic shelters at [lie park, they need to have some type of restroom facility available, as well. however, this facility does not necessarily have to be permanent. Mr. Mael cod agreed and said park staff has indicated that the City typically provides portable restroom facilities in these situations. Board Member Freeman asked if the children's play area would be too isolated in the location proposed in Alternative C. Mr. MacLeod answered that the play area would be visible from the parking lot, and police would be able to see most of the activities in the park from the parking lot, as well. In addition, homes along the edge of the park property would be able to see the park from their second story. Board Member Henderson expressed his belief that a restroom facility would be an important feature for people who visit parks with children. With all of the various activities planned for the new park, it would be appropriate to provide this service. Board Member Reed asked why the trail through the open space to connect the park with the proposed new PRD is not shown in all three alternatives. Mr. MacLeod said his intent was to illustrate that the park design could move forward without utilizing the open space. Mr. McIntosh said his preference would be to snake the open space part of the park, but they do not have a formal agreement from the PRD developer yet. Board Member Young asked if a formal public hearing would be conducted before the Planning/Parks Board before a recommendation is forwarded to the City Council. Mr. McIntosh explained that the purpose of tonight's presentation is to provide an update to the Board and solicit their feedback. A public hearing before the Parks Board level would be scheduled once the design is more refined. Before construction plans can move forward, the Board must send a recommendation to the City Council and the City Council must hold a public hearing and make the final decision. Board Member Young asked how the size of the proposed new park would compare with other parks in Edmonds. Mr. McIntosh answered that there are two other neighborhood parks that are almost the identical size: Seaview Park and Sierra Park. The other neighborhood parks are smaller in size. Board Member Young asked for clarification as to why the new park would be classified as a neighborhood park. Mr. McIntosh explained that parks are classified based on size, location and the attractions provided. The proposed park's size and location would justify the neighborhood park classification. Board Member Young questioned the rationale for determining whether or not it would be appropriate to provide a facility for organized sports in this location. He suggested it seems the space is too small for this use, and there are not enough parking spaces available to support organized sports activities. He pointed out that school facilities provide plenty of places for sporting events, so he is not convinced there is a need to put this type of activity in a neighborhood park. Mr. McIntosh said his vision for this park would include a ball field that is more like what currently exists at the Anderson Center for smaller children. It would not be a facility for adult use. The SnoKing Youth Club would use the field for baseball in the spring and soccer in the fall. I -le noted that the City does not schedule any of their fields for Sunday use. He pointed out that providing 11 ell Planning Board Minutes )fly I I , 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 253 of 333 this type of field at the new park would free up space somewhere else for older children and adults to play. He emphasized that there is a need for more space for organized sporting events in the City, and he doesn't see this need getting smaller. The Edmonds School District has improved their fields and offered them for the children to use. However, more and more children are getting involved in organized sports, and the demand will continue to grow. He pointed out that the proposed new park would be similar in size to Seaview and Sierra Parks, and they both have sport fields. Board Member Young expressed the importance of distinguishing between ball fields for small children to play on and ball fields for the more intense organized sports for older children and adults. He noted there is a huge difference between the informal type of field the consultant is proposing and rnore formal ball fields such as Meadowdale Playfield. Board Member Reed requested a comparison between the parking that is provided on Pine Street Park and what would be available at the new site. Mr. McIntosh said neighbors that surrounding parks in the City ]lave indicated that people tend to park everywhere when a major event takes place. Ile acknowledged that parking is a concern; and the staff would work with the consultant to incorporate more parking spaces in the final plan for the park Board Member Works asked if the sport courts that currently exist throughout the City are heavily used. She also asked if there arc other facilities of this type close by. Mr. MacLeod answered that there is a covered court at the Sherwood Elementary School, and they are open for the public to use during non -school hours. The sport court proposed in the plan would be smaller than a full basketball court, and this would keep with the neighbors' desire for a less formal park. He emphasized that t13e sport courts at other parks are heavily used. Chair Guenther pointed out that the pedestrian connections provided in Alternatives A and C appear to the most inviting and appropriate for a neighborhood park. Ile noted that, typically, there is an overlapping need for parking during little league games, so it would be appropriate to provide more parking if possible. Mr. McIntosh agreed that a formal little league field would definitely need more parking, but the less formal field that is being proposed for the new park site would be used for a practice field where only one or two teams would be present at any given time. Board Member Reed said he is very sympathetic to the need for more sport fields in the community. He suggested the City explore all of the other alternatives, as well. If kids are being turned away from sport programs; then the City must deal with the issue from a broader perspective. He said he doesn't see this property as a place for organized games because of the parking issue that currently exists. lie would prefer Alternative C, and he encouraged the consultant and park staff to __cotrtiauc_to._work.withthel7cighb.9rs.andut]ireihcr,deas.... _.. __ - _..._..... - -.... Board Member Reed noted that there seems to be a lot of confusion about the trees and which ones would be retained and which ones would be removed. He suggested that City staff clearly communicate this information to the public. Mr. MacLeod explained there were a variety of reasons for taking out the trees that were removed from the site; but it is important to note that because of the additional analysis, six or seven more trees were saved than originally anticipated. Ile said there is still a question of whether or not the City should continue to remove trees that could survive otherwise to make room for park amenities. However, he noted that Alternative C would save all of the retraining trees. Mr. McIntosh agreed to post the tree report on the City's web site for the public to access. Board Member Henderson recalled that sonic citizens leave recently expressed a need to have more space for dogs in parks, but as a general rule, Edmonds doesn't allow dogs in their parks. Mr. McIntosh pointed out that the City currently has eight parks where dogs are allowed, and he recommended that the new park allow dogs on a leash, as well. Hoard Member Freeman said she attended both of the neighborhood meetings related to the park design and was able to gain a clear understanding of what the neighbors are asking for. They want a family -oriented, neighborhood park, and Alternative C would be the best choice to meet this desire since it appears to retain the trees that most people were concerned about. She emphasized that the surrounding neighbors do not want the park to be a destination, and keeping with a less formal design would fulfill this purpose. She agreed that the City should not develop a formal ball field for scheduled games because parking is a real concern and providing more spaces would take up some of the available park space. Planning Board Minotes hily t I, 2007 Page S Packet Page 254 of 333 Board Member Freeman asked if there would be standing water at the rain garden that would draw mosquitoes. Mr. Macleod explained that the rain garden concept has been around for a long time. Whether it involves standing water or not depends on Where the outfall is located. Chair Guenther pointed out that a rain garden would provide a great educational opportunity for the public, as well. Perhaps an interpretive sign would be appropriate. Board Member Freeman noted that demographics are changing over time so the City should not plan the future of the park based on the current demographics. Mr. Macleod suggested that perhaps they could change the configuration to allow additional parking to be accommodated in the future if a formal ball field is ever created. THE BOARD TOOK A BREAK A"T' 8:30 P.M. "rHEY RECONVENED THE MEETING AT 8:40 P.M. DISCUSSION OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TITLE 20 MATERIAL Mr. Bowman referred the Board to (lie memorandum that was prepared by the City Attorney to identify substantive issues the Board should discuss and provide direction on. In answer to Board Member Dewhirst's question of how the Board would identify the proposed changes from the language that currently exists, Mr. Bowman emphasized that the new language proposed for Title 20 would become a new document. Information that is found in the existing Development Code would be in the new language, but it would be reorganized into tables, etc. to make it easier to read. Role of the City Council Mr. Bowman advised that the first issue in the memorandum is related to the City Council's role in quasi-judicial matters. The City Attorney has asked the Board to consider what role the City Council should play in closed record reviews. If the Board agrees the City Council should continue as a final decision maker, they must identify the matters that would be appealable to them and whether the parties should be limited to written submissions. Mr. Bowman recalled the training session presented by Mike Walters of the Washington Cities Insurance Agency (WCIA). Mr. Walters emphasized the need to depoliticize the land use processes that are more policy oriented and tighten the review o1' quasi-judicial matters. IIe explained that, currently, the City Council acts as the final arbitrator for most quasi-judicial decisions via a closed record review based on the record from a previous open record hearing. The City Attorney has advised that this process presents potential problems for the City. At this time, state law only allows for one open record hearing to introduce all of the evidence into the record. However, when a closed record review comes before the City Council, it is extremely difficult to keep the discussion to the existing record. Only those individuals who previously testified would be allowed to speak before . _. the City Council, and their comments must be related only to those issues already raised in the open record hearing. No new information could be entered into the record. Ile said it is important for the Board to understand that if an item goes to a court appeal, the judge would only look at the open hearing record to determine how the City Council reached their decision. Mr. Bowman expressed his belief that the City Council should get out of the quasi-judicial decision making process_ It is oftentimes difficult for elected officials to keep politics out of their quasi-judicial decision making, and this makes it difficult for their decisions to stand up in court. While }politicians want to listen to their constituents and make decisions based on their comments, if a proposal meets all of the development code criteria; the City Council must approve the development permit. If the City Council is going to remain the arbitrator in closed record reviews, Mr. Bowman suggested that the City Council's review should be done based on written submissions rather than oral comments. This would make the closed -record hearing process clear, and all parties would be able to submit their written comments and make sure neither side is introducing new information into the record. He noted that most of (lie significant problems occur when on -the -record statements are made regarding off -the record matters. If comments are limited to written submissions, the burden could be placed on the parties to identify off-the-record issues, thus taking the staff and City Council out of the middle of resolving these issues at a hearing. Again, if the Board is not interested in getting the City Council out of quasi-judicial decisions, Mr. Bowman urged them to make the appeal process more formal to not allow new information to be introduced into the record. Mr. Bowman said the City Attorney is also seeking direction from the Board about whether or not the City Council should be provided an independent right of appeal if they are not going to be the final decision maker in quasi-judicial matters. He questioned if the Board would be interested in allowing the City Council to challenge Hearing Examiner Decisions, but he Planning Board Minutes July 11, 2007 Page G Packet Page 255 of 333 OF LBM ti y ay4 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The City of Edmonds has purchased 5.56 acres of property form the Edmonds School District with the purpose of developing the site as a neighborhood park. Approximately 1.5 acres currently wooded on the north side of the site will remain the same, and the remaining 4 acres will be developed with traditional park elements such as modified soccer and little league sized play fields, approximately 32 parking spaces, a sport court, play toy area, benches, and picnic tables. The applicant has submitted building permits to demolish the existing structures on site and anticipates approximately 200 cubic yards of excavation and 1000 cubic yards of fill (topsoil and washed gravel) for the field development. File Numbers BLD-2006-1094, and BLD-2006-1150 through 1157. Proponent: Brian Mclntosh, Director— City of Edmonds Parks & Recreation Department. Location of proposal, including street address: 23700 104"' Avenue West, Edmonds, Washington ("Old Woodway Elementary School" Site — see vicinity map on the reverse side of this form). Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 22, 2006. Project Planner: Steve Bullock, AICP — Senior Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, AICP — Planning Mana �--n Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1121 5th Avenue h, Edmonds 980 425-771-0220 r Date: f' Signal XX You may appeal this determination to Rob'Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than December 22 2006. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Steve Bullock to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on December 8 2006, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. SEPA DETERMINATION_WOODWAYPARK.DOC Packet Page 256 of 333 Page I of 2 Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation XX Environmental Review Section Attn: Ramin Pazooki Department of Ecology SnoKing Developer Services, MS 221 P.O. Sox 47703 1 15700 Dayton Ave. N. Olympia, WA 98504-7703 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 XX COMCAST Outside Plant Engineer, North Region XX Parks and Recreation Commission 410 Valley Ave NW #12 P.O. Box 42650 Puyallup, WA 98371-3317 Olympia, WA 98504-0917 XX Applicant: XX City of Shoreline Brian McIntosh, Director Attn.: Project Manager City of Edmonds Parks & Recreation 17544 Midvale Avenue North 700 Main Street Shoreline, WA 98133A921 Edmonds WA 98020 XX Town of Woodway XX Olympic View Water & Sewer District Attn.: Clerk -Treasurer 23725 Edmonds Way 23920 113th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 Woodway, WA 98020 XX Puget Sound Energy XX Lorinda Anderson Attn: Elaine Babby lntergancey Comm. Outdoor Recreation PO Box 90868, MIS XRD-1 W PO Box 40917 Bellevue, WA 98009 Olympia, WA 98504-0917 XX Dean Saksena, Senior Manager XX Edmonds School District No. 15 Snohomish Co. PUD Attn.: Brian Harding PO Box 1107 20420 68th Avenue West Everett, WA 98206-1107 Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Attachments Pc: File No, BLO-2006-1094 SEPA Notebook vicinityMap 23700 104th Avc W 0 125 250w ^N S .Ot 240TH PL SW SEPA DETERMINATION_WOODWAYPARK.DOC Packet Page 257 of 333 Page 2 of 2 OF f Drj�O Purpose of Checklist: CITY OF EIDMONIDS RECEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 200 PERMIT COUNTED The State Environmental Policy Act (SEI'A), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Insiruetions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to escribe some basic information about your pro osal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are s►gn iscant; requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you,can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best ofybur knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as ,zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions applyG osal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPRO,IECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND I. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ?cs."V 2. Name of applicant: 'b ,r ka 3. Address and phone number of applicant and ``ontact person: W ti a 0 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: Cityo Edmonds Page I of 24 S,pa 0,,Xiqg�&LiJPAW32M of 333 1 G. Proposed tinning or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): C�g2lar�aVS Ci0, SV( 1i� ;_-Q ocF�4`M d��rn01 10 SG�ao� (STAFF COM 7. Do you have any plans for fnturc additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) , 1, � 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. Do you know whether applications are pending; for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 11 q� [- C.rJo �`CG�C1V C1�^ Ga`rf-`c�ov� SU-Q., iaA� cAtl.�—R (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 2 of 24 scpa chwklist - publicdocA 39 2006 Packet Page 259 of 333 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. y n t ------ V 5 1 2 (}14r- V fA r (STAFF COMMENTS) l,l! 7rt% O (e ^ ! U q 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of file project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You A --* .—A t...-n—f tlsncn anewprc an fhic nAml (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ - 12. Vocation of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. 1f a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide Iegal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related 41 Page 3 of 24 Packe PIRe �9 of 333 scpa chee, I - pn �h, A. G TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I . . - Earth It. General descril3tion of the site (circle one)CFWI) fling, hilly, steep slopes mountainous, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? y-� ses S Q e Flu up av rn�c (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ e. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them -and -note -any prime farmland-. (STAFF COMM E NTS) 5nik h2W-V�,4 plo Wth Map tAYId -- 1+ ( bykVt1k!A ya11d4 loam ') #n" 15 & (v LA-U§ rw404-- Virbali tanA ar�1CA ( 15vzer& + 9ravctkti saw E aam . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS} C f AG 1y klO� W(AMM -rY� laMA. 4 1A& VLa2'4V'd 01Ir e a. Page 4 of 24 sepa check list - pubVc.ddC:4, 3-2W6 Packet Page 261 of 333 C. Describe tl►e purpose, type and approximate qua►►tities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate so►rrce (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS)__✓ g. About what Percent of tl►e site will be covered wit,► impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or builoings)? SWA N A N� ,__ ��?ErVtoUt SUr1aC� v.U1v��rtt — Y C�i1Q,r� i r �t glSh�1 ►C �� S� ��• 3 S o�T G.._._.. o ado SC�. ]-1 ((SS 1TAFF COMMENTS)✓ --- — h 2. AIR a. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: (STAFF comMl NTs)_��e....ta��c.c byn.ti ne'v� D_ (v'fy'i rat a tv � 5 >� A. { v� � l c.t d�. c/o v Uv l' vt m ct-Vcrn' a 1 ei o el -4 t'v - What types of emissions to the air would result from the Proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and indt►strial wood smoke) during construction and when the Project is completed? if any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. P-Vy \_1 %or-s d� VAS�'r (STAFF COMMENTS} Page 5 of 24 Packet Page 262 of 333 scpa cbccklisi - p.blic. dnc4.3. 2006 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ - C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissionr other impacts to (Ile, if any: kQ-7.VVIAo (I A e,V%IJ X (STAFF COMMENTS)_ 3. WATER a. Surface: (I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round anti seasonal streams, saltwater, takes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yesi, please describe and attach available plans. �AoPS...........C�� C- pl-lh (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. (STAFF C Page 6 of 24 sepa chccUzt , puWie.Aoc',4.3. 2006 Packet Page 263 of 333 (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate tgnantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ (5) Does the proposal tic within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. L0 (STAFF COMMENTS)mm IDD_ P a rn ID o ytkl( T--'t o o A P I A i` n t'r 7-0''''C�' x ._-. . (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ Page 7 of24 Packet Page 264 of 333 sepa checklist - pubik. in 4.3.2006 (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. _.— (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? if so_ describe_ (STAFF COMMENTS) _✓ (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? if so, generally describe. g.o ' (STAFF COMMENTS)_. Y d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: t 1 t r (STAFF COMM 1)s Page 8 of 24 sepa ehecklisi - pub6c.dot:4.3.2006 Packet Page 265 of 333 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: j deciduous tree: 'i Ide , a aspen, other: �ItAri- Jevergreen tree:]ffdar mj other: _ — Jsl�r►�bs _ ha�`a_� grass nAstE�re b C. crop or grain -- wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, celgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: _ (STAFF COMMENTS)__ ✓ _ What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? W ti (STAFF COMMENTS)_ ✓ _ — _ �.. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS)_ Page 9 of 24 Packet Page 266 of 333 sepa cIvcck691 - Ptlblk &C 4.3.2006 Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on Elie site, if any:, (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ S. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: iawk �erou, eagle, sangbarc tl�er:----_—— mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS)__N 01<G "DV"—' C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. A V\6V (STAFF COMMENTS) hod" v�Ili"i/li'VI Q laq_al__.-._In�l'�l'fe C,QYvt�dov Page 10 of 24 scpa checklist - public.doc.-4.3.2006 Packet Page 267 of 333 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ _. _ _ -.. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. C- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. WI►at kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page I I of 24 Packetrgae4 �G g#of 333 stpa chcckLsz - pu C 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic cbeinicals, risk of fire anti explosion, spill, or hazardou'3' waste, (hat could occur as result of this proposal? If so describe. M A21�L- A (STAFF COMMEN (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. (STAFF COMMEMS) V/ (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environment I icallb hazards, if any: = b-61 (STAR, COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, Other)? (STAFF COMMENTS) 11age 12 of 24 scpa cheek o - public doc:4 32006 Packet Page 269 of 333 (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated will' the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? )ndieatc what hour's noise would come from t1wsitc. 11 o., tin r,, nti n n A, _.� d. l C U .—A c 33 el (STAFF COMM ENTS)_✓ (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS)_ S-0(MZ-6.c tKINr!_.. PrI_AJ. r.AoAA- S. ],,and and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? w (STAFF COMMF.N b. )Alas the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 13 of 24 Packet Page7(f 333 Sep chc4klin - Pubic. c 2 C. Describe any structrres on the site. (STAFF COMM b1 [l. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 11 C,�1 I� �; rr.� c.`yre S �� ►�_�.__.. �i c QA"r-15e d (STAFF COMMENTS)_ 8 VD ` 2-t? 0 (P 6 D Ih-�� C. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) ��,.�=' ✓ Y f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? S t►�g1-e-.'I-- (STAFF COMMENTS)__ �A) �trb a 4 ' g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) 1 �A- Yipt` V1rWK lFA....c? � o Y&[I.Vt' V� Page 14 of 24 Acpa Chctklisi - puhlicdoc:4.1, 2006 Packet Page 271 of 333 It. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (STAFF commENTS)_ yt5 - -h �''r W Fo Yi sn dope > •� Vti c ��atl`fi'e� u� A GrI' l_ A °� C, 1aq • C�� p y�ructu 5 vW✓K iy Yugo c d v4ty 15D 0 tVli,�, arza-, Q liu WvAAt tx. YegLAvr-r-cL - !f- Wn�k� i. Approximately how tnany people would reside or work in the completed project? WU !7 p VD Pb 4,--r- a( a___Y� (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ � �_v��'�� b s� �1----��._r�- At Approximately how Inany people would the completed project displace? (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) —/--- Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: , (STAFF COMMENTS)- rage l s of 24 sc�,a ehe�biclj,�,[,} ggq,?J6&of 333 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) v b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENT C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: A ca e 5 aA— , o"\" (STAFF COMMENTS) V �.-- _......... —_-_- 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exteriorbuildingmaterial(s) proposed? 11 L ;fcXU �ntP�n A` ink br✓1l �ac�Lc�..� �i ��11�\i.' 1..rA�. (STAFF COMMENTS) Wiil_ I YtVi twa[--Upr5vl lq�Ryrvlr'-f - rage 16 of 24 spa checklist - public.doc.4.3.2006 Packet Page 273 of 333 b. What views in the iunmediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? hov-\1✓ — -- (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or controlaestheiic impacts, if any: } t (STAFF CO 11. Light and Glare a. Wl)at type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? (STAFF COMMENTS) b, Could light or (STAFF COM re from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of liglit or glare may affect your proposal? a +ice K-►��\,.� ._ _..._��_ (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 17 of 24 Spa Che Pac �i �?7dkof333 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and Mare impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities,are in file immediate vicinity? - V V � t , J'1- V"A-e- - f�� o �. c� �o u nt15 0"'-. fb A\ W C) Aw" V�V'Q ")f.. 'r q- (STAFF COMMEMS) _ — b. Would the proposed project displace any existing; recreation uses? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) ✓ � --�� _� ____ � rnT _--.__ c, Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: (STAFF COM 11age 19 of 24 sepa checklist - public, doc.4, 3.2006 Packet Page 275 of 333 13. Ilistoric a►►cl Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or obj} cts listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to tile site? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMM b. Generally describe any land►narks or evidence of i►istoric, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. (STAI+F COMMENTS c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. 'Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. (STAFF COMMENTS 11age 19 of 24 Packet Page 37A of 333 Sepclieckiias - pvbbc ( CA .i 6 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 1_ y i�5o _ LUTr�:; S�ril �C'Yk l �rLtY•51�p`--_ ___ -- C. (STAFF COMMFNT Flow many parking spaces would the completed project have? blow many would (lie (lie project eliminate? rl e L.1`oll. � � � (. SQaGeS + '. s nrr �.cr �t1av1 (STAFF COMMENTS) W01 Wiiyt---bAit1'V1_ �y►v�i _� � cl. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). hQ (STAFF COMM C. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 20 of 24 sepa ehecklisi - public doc.4 3.2006 Packet Page 277 of 333 f. Ilow many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 4y AL--_voLJvni.i�ll� �OcGv� O {� 1�v�0y�_��"-�_ w�w (STAFF COMM EN'I'S) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. k1 D (STAFF COMM b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: doR s Y\A- apr l (STAFF COM Page 21 of 24 scpa crcckPf gtf'ds29?.jg� of 333 16. Utilities a. Circle ufilifies currently available at the site: 1Ee tr►ci natural ga ,Ovate refuse service clephone, sanitary sew , septic system,, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the ofility providing the service, and the general construction acfivifies on the site or in the i►nrnciliate vicinity which ►night be needed. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true ind complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted Page 22 of 24 sepa checklut � pubtc.dac4, 3, 2006 Packet Page 279 of 333 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 568 FEET OF TEiE EAST 920 FEET OF THE NOR'rHWE$T QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMLTTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT T-H WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF WOODWAY MEADOWS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PAGES 70 AND 71, UNDF_R RECORDING NUMBER 7907240221, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88" 37' 08" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERN MOST LINE OF SAID PLAT, AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 403,90 FEET TO THE NORT1iC-AST CORNER OF SAID ECLAT; TI IENCE SOUTH 06 54' 22" WEST, ALONG AN EAST LINE OF SAID PLAT, 78.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF EEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 54- 22" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 490.00 FEETTO ANOTHER NORTH LINE OF SAID PLAT; T HENCr SOUTH 686 37' 08" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 437.79 FEET TO THE- NOR-01WESTEERLY MARGIN OF 237TH PLACE SW AND A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 356 15' 21" EAST 203.22 FEET DISTANT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN AND ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OE= 19° 19' 15", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 68.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 22' 52" EAST 4S9.08 Fi:ET; THENCE NORTH 880 37' 08" WEST 502.66 FET:T TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Survey h Mapping 13005 NE 126th PL KIRKLAND, WA 98034 TEL. 425.823--5700 FAX 425$23-8700 Packet Page 280 of 333 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL B THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 568 Fr -ET OF THE EAST 920 FEETOF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAME'ITE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER Of SAID SECTION 36 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF WOODWAY MEADOWS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PAGES 70 AND 71, UNDER RECORDING NUM13ER 7907240221, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 880 37' 08" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERN MOST LINE OF SAID PLAT, AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 403,90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 00 54' 22" WEST, ALONG AN EAST LINE OF SAID PEAT, 56,8.02 FEET TO ANOTHER NORTH LINE OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 880 37' 08" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 07.79 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF 237TH PLACE SW AND A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH aws SOUTH 350 13' 21" EAST 203.22 FEET DISTANT; TWCNCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN AND ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 190 19' 15", AN ARC DISTANCE" OF 68.53 FE:£T TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1° 22' 52" EAST 459.08 FEET; THENCE; NORTH Fib" 37' 08" WEST 502.66 FEET TO SATE) EAST LINE OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 09 54' 22" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 78.02 FEET TO SAID NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 869 37' 08" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 877.84 F=E TO THE WEST LINE OF A WEDGE SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES PER DEED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1237407, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 07" 14' 40" EAST 85,97 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSi C`nON BETWEEN THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 85 FEET AND THE WEST LINE: OF Ti IE EAST 30 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00 54' 22" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 442,913 FEET TO THE NORTFIEfILY MARGIN OF 237TH PLACE SW; THENCE NORTH 880 36' 42" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN, 330,71 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 203.22 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN AND ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17" 17' 24" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 61.32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 13005 NE 126th PL KIRKLAND, WA 98034 TEL. 425,1523-5700 FAX 425,523-5700 ' 41957 v " JOB NO. DATE 06016 7/19/06 WRITTEN BY CHECKED BY AWG MTSE SHEET PARCEL D 2 OF 3 Packet Page 281 of 333 Tf ............... tM 41, gm. 1Z '"Wil MAW. SAO 'I VIR kkmln City of Edmonds Parks & Recreation Old Woodway Elementary Park. Preliminary Conceptual Plan * june20o6 Packet Page 283 of 333 10,6 1 rm, ........... _ _i'Igulf�\��19F✓Ir � __,-J __ � '�r �F 4 I!Ktlr M Frio 2m m 22M 71RA zzru� 236h ' -- 3m 23lM 2a0T _._ $ ✓ 24a} F�q 2m ■ Site Location Map Packet Page 284 of 333 L� 1 )C��fiaryt��aCergr _ _L. P4hrdlle*<;; Ova' G�1^� • �L�-11'l�__ - j 1`� 4AaJ - �h -C DD h t e 5 a c� �o nn Is Ok hem t� a r j u l f S Olhd CWJI-eh_l T�I's jgnrk 'S 000C1 6,,-2 Nr hejrW:)v ,6z) ; OU a hj \JDonc. • J U /100J 1.h 4�e- It�CIG�COa'_ 1 . ivy �uL _y/ u v` rye, Clir-4 e r SEP 2 9 2007 Packet Page 285 of 333 Chase, Sandy From: tobjul5@comcast.net Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 7:48 PM To: Chase, Sandy Subject: FW: Old Woodway Elem Park Preferred Plan -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- From: tobjul5@comcast.net To: cgase@ci.edmonds.wa.us, spellman@ci.edmonds.wa.us Subject: Old Woodway Elem Park Preferred Plan Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:50:51 +0000 I wanted to drop a note regarding the plan for the Old Woodway Elementary Park- Preferred Plan dated 9/6/07. I LOVE IT! As a mother of three, I can see where this park plan fills the many needs we have in this neighborhood. I love the various activities that are available for the various ages that will be using this park. I have shared copies of this plan with many of my neighbors (hopefully they have emailed you as well) and most have been very happy with the plan. My 9 year old is very excited about the park plan. She's looking forward to playing here with her friends. I am very excited to have a safe walking area. I walk in the cemetery- but many times I'm not able to due to services or visitors. I prefer not to walk on the streets because of traffic etc. I have tried to walk on the track at the old high school, but since there is school in at the times I walk, I am not allowed to. Since there aren't sidewalks in many of the surrounding areas, a safe walking path will be a very welcome addition! I couldn't tell if there was going to be play equipment in the play area- We really hope so. My kids have always enjoyed playing on the structure down at Francis Anderson and Edmonds City Park. I'm sure that whatever is at this neighborhood park will not be as large- but any equipment will be eagerly and thoroughly used. (My daughters would love swings!) Thank you for all your efforts and for listening to my input! Julie Tobiassen 24126 105th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 10/9/;9Ret Page 286 of 333 RECEIVED 10523 240th Place S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 October 6, 2007 Edmonds City Council 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 OCT 0 9 2007 EDMONDS CITY CLERK To Mayor Haakenson, Council President Peggy Pritchard Olson and Council Members: The current plan for the "Old Woodway Elementary Park" has my full support. My neighborhood, Forest Glen has about 100 homes and many small children who will utilize every part of the park. The swing type items, sports court and rock climb will allow activities not available elsewhere in our neighborhood. The walkway that circles the park will be used by walkers of all ages as most of our local areas do not have sidewalks. Only one member of the Edmonds Planning Board objected to the inclusion of the T- gall park. This is such an important entry level activity for children ages 5 to 9. Our children attended this grade school and their children have played T-Ball there. Please preserve this activity. Brian McIntosh has done an extroardinary job in that the final park plan is almost e"actly as we, as a group, requested in the community park planning meetings: a child and family friendly area for neighboring areas. Please, accept the plan as presented. Thank you to Mayor Haakenson, and the Edmonds City Council for your part in bringing this park to fruition Sincerely, Janet R_ Robertson (206)546-5578 Packet Page 287 of 333 AM-1206 4. Closed Record Review R-07-53 Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Gina Coccia Time: 45 Minutes Department: Planning Type: Action Review Committee: Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subiect Title Closed record review of the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone of the property located at 23601 Edmonds Way from Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW). Applicants are A.D. Shapiro Architects and Marier & Marier (File No. R-2007-53). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance approving the change in zoning, as recommended by the Planning Board. Previous Council Action The City Council approved an amendment to the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) in February, 2007 which created the zones that the applicants are now seeking to apply to the subject properties (see Ordinance #3627, Attachment 4 of Exhibit 2). Narrative The applicants are requesting a change in zoning for properties they own within the Edmonds Way Corridor (SR-104). The Planning Board held a public hearing on the request on September 12, 2007 and, after deliberations, they recommended unanimously that the City Council approve the change in zoning. The verbatim transcript of the Planning Board action and their reasoning is contained in Exhibit 1. The staff report and attachments are contained in Exhibit 2. Parties of Record for the City Council closed record review are listed in Exhibit 3. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Planning Board Verbatim Transcript Link: Planning Board Staff Report Link: Parties of Record Form RoutinLY/Status Packet Page 288 of 333 Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 10/11/2007 04:15 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 04:17 PM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/11/2007 04:40 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 04:43 PM APRV Form Started By: Gina Coccia Started On: 10/11/2007 11:39 AM Final Approval Date: 10/11/2007 Packet Page 289 of 333 CITY OF EDMONDS VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS OF PLANNING BOARD HEARING File Number R-07-53 September 12, 2007 Chair Guenther: Okay, Item C, an application for a rezone of properties located at the southeast corner of Edmonds Way and 236th Street Southwest from BN to BC-EW. File Number R-07-53. Before you start, this is a quasi-judicial issue, so if there's been any ex parte communications, anybody that lives near the site, anything else that needs to be disclosed, do it now. All right. Mr. Bowman: Hearing no objection from the audience... Ms. Coccia: Good evening. My name is Gina Coccia; I'm a planner with the Planning Division. This is an application by A.D. Shapiro Architects for a rezone of properties at 23610 Edmonds Way from the current zoning of Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business -Edmonds Way (BC-EW). I have the Comprehensive Plan vicinity map on the overhead here. This was included as Attachment 2 to my Staff Report. I will try to keep this brief because I know that the applicant has expressed an interest in showing you a power point presentation that will likely answer more of your questions. Ms. Coccia: I'll say that the area under review is on the south side of 236th Street Southwest, on the east side of Edmonds Way/State Route 104. The site is approximately .6 acres in size and has about 210 feet of frontage along Edmonds Way and about 160 feet of frontage along 236t11 Street Southwest. The eastern parcel is undeveloped, while the western parcel is vacant but had previously been developed with a self-service diesel gas station. Ms. Coccia: For rezone requests, the Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for a final decision. The Edmonds Community Development Code, Section 20.40.010, provides that at a minimum, the following factors shall be considered in reviewing application for a rezone: 1. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The zoning ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. 3. Surrounding area. The relationship of the proposed zone change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby properties. 4. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in City policy to justify the rezone. 5. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time that the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning. 6. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. Ms. Coccia: I can go into these at length, but it's in your staff report. So if you have any questions, I'll just say that staff agrees with the materials provided by the applicant and that narrative provided by the applicant, which is Attachment 2. This application was routed around to various departments and divisions for their comments, and there were no comments received from the City departments reviewing the proposal. Also, no public comments were received. However, one person requested to become a party of record because they were interested. Based on the findings of fact, analysis, conclusions and attachments in the staff report, staff recommends that the Planning Board make a recommendation to City Council to approve Packet Page 290 of 333 the requested rezone to Community Business -Edmonds Way (BC-EW). Would you like to ask any questions or should I have the applicant prepare his presentation at this time? Chair Guenther: I think the applicant should make his presentation. Mr. Shapiro: Thank you, Planning Board. It's a pleasure to be here again. I just want to run through some of the history or the context of the property. I know that we're all familiar with Edmonds Way, yet we're going to touch through some of the components. The subject property is here towards the south end of the site, or the road, excuse me. Edmonds Way loops back down in here, the car wash is down in this location, and the Westgate Chapel. One of the things I want to point out with this map was the amount of commercial activity that still is occurring down at this end of the road. There may be some concern that this end of Edmonds Way is more prone to say strict residential, say multi -family use. Yet when we look at it, there's a surprising amount of commercial activity. There is an orthodontics office almost next door to the site. There's a contractor's office next door to the site. I think I've got a closer slide further on that shows some of the other activity. Here we are. So there's a small office here, I think a massage parlor's here, or (There was a lot of laughing at this point, while it was clarified that the use was a massage therapy business). I misspoke there. There is a multi -family site immediately to our east. It's kind of a flag shaped lot that comes in from 236th and accesses an apartment complex, kind of circular around the parking area. This is a small contractor's office building. Actually, that's the orthodontists, I think the contractor's right here. Olympic View Water is right in this location, and Gary Ayers Insurance is just up the road a little bit. And then also an automotive repair. I just wanted to put it in context that there is a lot of commercial activity at this end of the road, which I believe, we believe supports the rezone to a little higher density condition. Mr. Shapiro: The current zoning, again this is the Comp Plan, which shows the extent of the Edmonds Way Corridor, and this is the zoning map. This is the subject parcel, which is currently zoned BN, which we're all aware of the limitations of BN being one unit per parcel for housing and commercial. With the current trend in today's market of more mixing uses, housing and commercial together, we would hope to get a more up to date in the EW, the BC-EW zone. This is a little close up of the site. One thing I do want to point out is the change of grade that the site has. If you look at the intersection of 236th and Edmonds Way as elevation zero, we come up about five feet at this location. I think we're up close to eight feet at this location on 236th. There's an eight -foot drop across the site. Again, these are taken with a Q-level. They are not surveyed, but they are probably within a foot or so in accuracy. The back corner of this property, which occurs somewhere back in here, I think is up like 12 feet, so it slopes up four feet from this point up to here. So there is a significant grade change. Mr. Shapiro: There's another paragraph, was reading in our application, and we talked about adjacent single-family homes. There is no adjacent single-family parcels to this parcel. It's all built as a multi -family zone, and in fact, there is an application pending right now for a town house development to occur on this parcel right here to our east. Snohomish County's across the street, and I believe there's an LDMR Development that's going in right here. So with that multi -family on this corner and condominium complex here, as well as a multi -family family up the street on the other side, so there is a fair amount of density on this stretch, yet there is no single-family. Mr. Shapiro: Here's another context of, we'll just run through some buildings very quickly, the community church, which is just rapping up here. Gary Ayers Insurance Company, Westgate Chapel, and this is the subject site. It used to have the gas station, a couple of years, it's closed down. A formal investigation has been done regarding contaminants, and the site is clean. The site is deeper than it looks. There are some large cottonwood trees on the property, and I believe the corner of the site somewhat up here. The site is deep enough to support a good stretch of commercial against Edmonds Way and then two, double -loaded parking isles, which is essentially close to 120 to 130-feet wide. So it's a fairly deep site, and nicely proportioned for utilization for parking. It's got a little bit of a slope. This is the corner of the property here. This the road, kind of a flag -shaped road, going back to these apartments. This is sloping down to the intersection. Mr. Shapiro: So the parcel is currently comprised of two parcels, the property being kind of in the middle, and these are the cottonwoods currently on the site. So I am going to briefly go through the reasons why we believe this is supported by the Comp Plan and the rezone. I know that Gina touched on some of the requirements, and we'll just go through briefly our reasoning. Mr. Shapiro: The City wants to be sure there are sufficient number of sites in the City to support commercial development and that it would be situated in the proper locations. We believe that Edmonds Way, being a primary east/west access Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-07-53 September 12, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 291 of 333 through Edmonds, supports more commercial development and a little bit higher density than the current BN zone permits. We also believe that Edmonds Way caters to multi -family type development, where indeed the BC-EW zone also encourages that mode of housing. The majority of the larger commercial properties are more in the Westgate area further down the street, yet this site totals about 25,000 square feet. So it's a decent sized property. Mr. Shapiro: The proposed rezone would allow for an eventual mixed -use building, and these parcels are ?? by on the Edmonds Corridor Designation. We believe that our proposal would have a minimal impact on the adjacent single-family properties, actually the nearby single-family properties to the east, from a light, traffic, glare and noise vantage point. I think the grade change going up the hill to the single-family parcels to the east also supports separation in that mode. Mr. Shapiro: I'll flip through some of these points. This again, talks a little bit about the current zone pattern. It's a little redundant. We want to make the point that a mixed -use function could house both commercial, parking, residential units and office space all in the same structure, which we believe helps create a more vibrant city with workers being in a given location during the day and then residents there during the evening hours during the work week. Instead of a typical office building that might be shut down in the evening hours or on the weekends. So we feel that this mode of building use helps, is a more efficient method of utilizing property and will provide both economic benefits to the City, as well as more livable units in and amongst commercial activity. Mr. Shapiro: Let's see, another point made by the Comp Plan requirements is that parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use, which we don't feel we fall into this mode, which is essentially saying that if any parcel is currently commercial, it should be only rezoned to single-family in the event that it's deemed non -suitable for commercial property, which doesn't fit this parcel. Mr. Shapiro: A third point is the proliferation of strip retailers on Edmonds Way and Edmonds Streets should not be encouraged. We believe that this type of zone essentially discourages strip retail development where you would have a single use and say parking separating the street from the building. So we would, under this zone, have the building set back from the street by four feet on the ground floors and ten feet on the upper floors. Yet we're still up against the street edge, which we believe, from an architectural and planning standpoint, helps create, if you would, an urban wall, which enhances, we believe, a more vibrant and lively city by giving commercial space a direct view onto traffic. Instead of people viewing into parking lots from their cars, they will be viewing into storefronts. So the ground floor would look like it would be comprised of small-scale offices such as an insurance company or a small retail if the parking ratio would permit. Mr. Shapiro: A fourth point under the Comp Plan requirements is that the design and location of all commercial sites shall provide for convenient and safe access for customers, employees and suppliers. This proposed rezone would help actually remove a couple of curb cuts off of Edmonds Way, we believe, ultimately, that the access to the site would be very efficient off of 236th, leaving the Edmonds Way frontage for pedestrian access. So the site is well suited to access from a side street instead of bringing all the traffic in off of Edmonds Way. Commercial and residential garage entries would be off of 232aa Also the residential access conceivably could be off of 236th, as well, if the desire was made. Yet it would bring an access point off of Edmonds Way to help encourage pedestrian activity up and down Edmonds Way. Mr. Shapiro: Commercial development should be carefully located and designed to eliminate or minimize adverse impacts of heavy traffic volume and other related problems on surrounding land uses. We feel that this site would have minimal impact on turning movements to and from Edmonds Way. There's a signal right here at the intersection, and getting in and out of this site would not have a negative impact on traffic up and down Edmonds Way. The BC-EW designation does require essentially a two-step setback; four feet for the lower floors and ten feet for the upper floors. We would also believe that it would help also support a quieter neighborhood atmosphere for the RM and single-family zones up 236th by keeping the access to say one curb cut off of 2361h instead of multiple curb cuts with a more of a strip retail type of scenario. Mr. Shapiro: Going into the zoning ordinance criteria, the first question is whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. One of the questions is to provide for areas of commercial uses offering various goods and services according to the different geographical areas and various categories of customers they serve. We believe that this proposal would continue that trend and support that. One of the desirable aspects of this site, from a small office standpoint, is the adjacency to I-5. It takes probably five more minutes to drive from this site down into downtown Edmonds if an office were located in Edmonds in the Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-07-53 September 12, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 292 of 333 bowl area, which for businesses that might have to access customers and clients outside of the area, access to I-5 is an important consideration. So we feel that this property supports the trend of offices located up and down Edmonds Way. Mr. Shapiro: Another question asked by the ordinance is provide for areas where commercial uses may concentrate for the convenience of the public and in mutually beneficial relationships to each other. We do believe that this is the case, that a question could be raised that we're intermixing with residential too much. Yet, I think the immediate properties around us being commercial up the hill to the south of us and even to the north of us across the street supports the commercial notion of this property. Yet the mixed -use nature of the building zone would also support residential, interaction with the adjacent residential properties to the east of us and to the west. Mr. Shapiro: The third question in the zoning is to provide for residential uses, community facilities and institutions which may appropriately locate in commercial zones. Again, the aspect of small office being located in a building of this size would help broaden the tax base for Edmonds and bring some office functions into Edmonds Way. Yet it wouldn't necessarily preclude retail, I mean if we had enough parking to support retail, it would also be a possibility for this location. Mr. Shapiro: The fourth question is to require adequate landscape and off-street parking and loading facilities. I guess the biggest challenge for a building sited in this configuration is access for garbage and say deliveries off of 236th. We think that it could be configured in such a fashion that we could interface with 236th in an acceptable means, enabling both garbage to be picked up and deliveries to be made off of 236th. So that will pose a little bit of a challenge when the refinement of a design is generated, which we believe can be resolved to the City's satisfaction in later phases. The other aspect is we believe it would be better to have those functions occurring off of 236th than it would be to have them occurring off of Edmonds Way. So to encourage this type of building use would help eliminate the conflict that we currently see on Edmonds Way with garbage trucks stopping right in the street there and picking up garbage. Mr. Shapiro: A fifth point is to protect commercial uses from hazards such as fire, explosions, noxious fumes, and other nuisances created by industrial uses, noise, dust... We believe that this development would not cause that type of activity and heavy truck traffic do the type of use. It's not really an industrial type proposal with the rezone. Mr. Shapiro: The surrounding area is another area raised by the zoning criteria. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property. Should the subject parcel be rezoned for this specific building use, it will mesh with the immediate neighborhood in the following ways. We believe that by maintaining the setback against the street and also encouraging commercial activity to be up against Edmonds Way will help enliven Edmonds Way and bring more life to the streetscape than say a busy boulevard with no pedestrian traffic whatsoever. So we would hope that by bringing the building out to the street edge, as this zone encourages, we help to bring more life to the street in that fashion. We also have setbacks that are required elsewhere on the property by the zone. The existing surrounding land uses do include commercial, as we've talked about before, as well as residential and service functions. And this zone meshing with those uses. The proposed project would house uses in the same fashion along the commercial and residential lines, and we feel that the pedestrian traffic to and from the project could utilize the bus routes and the transit facilities on Edmonds Way. Mr. Shapiro: A fourth point raised by the zoning criteria is whether there's been sufficient change in character of the immediate or surrounding area or in City policy to justify the rezone. We do believe with the Growth Management Act and the desire for higher densities to be achieved within the metropolitan area, that the higher densities that this zone would permit would be a welcome addition to the City. It could be done in a tasteful fashion under the criteria stipulated in this zone. So we feel that it would support that. Mr. Shapiro: Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and under the proposed zoning. We feel, again, discussing the proximity of the arterial, 236th being off an arterial and having a signal access from the property would support a higher density without having major traffic conflicts with Edmonds Way. Mr. Shapiro: The sixth question raised by the rezone criteria is the relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared with the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. We feel that this property uses a mixed -use Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-07-53 September 12, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 293 of 333 configuration that would mesh well with the surrounding neighborhood. The neighborhood is not a uniform building type or and use pattern. It's more of a variety of land uses that this mixed -use configuration would mesh well with. Mr. Shapiro: With that, that ends our formal presentation, and we're open to questions. Thank you. Chair Guenther: Any questions? Board Member Reed: I have one. I know you mentioned this, but I don't, I'm not clear on it. You said that to the eastern corner of the property up 236tn, the slope is about eight foot higher than Edmonds Way. Is that right? Mr. Shapiro: Yes, that intersection of Edmonds Way. Board Member Reed: Okay, and that goes on up, that continues to slope up. Do you have any idea how much steeper it gets or does it just maintain that same... Mr. Shapiro: Off 236tn as it goes up the hill towards Safeway or... Board Member Reed: Is that the one that goes to Safeway or is that 238tn. Mr. Shapiro: It is 238tn that goes in front of Safeway. This goes behind that shopping center, that's correct. Board Member Reed: I just wondered how much more it sloped beyond your property there. It looks like a little more. Mr. Bowman: It's approximately 390 at the elevation at that corner there on 2361n. And as you go up 2361n, you've got elevations ranging from, one parcel around elevation 400 on up to probably I would estimate about 420. So it's climbing away from State Route 104 on 236tn Board Member Reed: Okay. Mr. Bowman: And I would refer you to the topo and vicinity map that was provided in the packet. Chair Guenther: This is part of the hearing I open for public testimony. Anybody in the audience who wants to come forward? No. Then I close the public testimony. I don't think you have anything to rebut. Board Member Young: Respond, not applicant rebuttal. Chair Guenther: Staff comments? All right. Any comments from the Board? Board Member Henderson: I think Tony and Gina have prepared a very thorough report for all the points justifying the rezone, and for that reason, I'm willing to approve it. Chair Guenther: Right now, I need to close the public hearing, and then we can deliberate. Our comments are also part of the public hearing. Board Member Henderson: Okay, sorry. Chair Guenther: Now that it's closed, now we can deliberate. Duane. Mr. Bowman: I would recommend, it sounds like you're moving in a direction that I think you're going to go, that the Planning Board adopt the findings of fact and conclusions contained in the staff report as your recommendation if you're so inclined to do so. Board Member Young: That sounds like a great idea, and I would so move. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-07-53 September 12, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 294 of 333 Chair Guenther: I second that. Board Member Young: You can't do that because you're the chair. Board Member Works: Well, I'll second it. Board Member Young: Thank you, Judith. Board Member Works: Now we can deliberate. Board Member Young: Now you can take the next step. Chair Guenther: All in favor say aye. Board Member Freeman: Aye. Board Member Young: Aye. Board Member Henderson: Aye. Board Member Works: Aye. Board Member Bowman: Aye. Board Member Reed: Aye. Chair Guenther: Aye. Opposed, say no. Hearing none, motion carries. All right, that's it. I TESTIFY THAT THESE VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY TO TRANSCRIBE THE PROCEEDINGS. Karin Noyes, Transcriber Date Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-07-53 September 12, 2007 Page 6 Packet Page 295 of 333 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD From: � Gina Coccia Planner Date: Planning Board Meeting of September 12, 2007 File: R-2007-53 Application by A.D. Shapiro Architects / Marier & Marier for a rezone of properties at 23601 Edmonds Way from the current zoning of Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW). Hearing Date, Time, and Place: September 12 2007 at 7:00 PM Edmonds City Council Chambers Public Safety Complex 250 - 5th Avenue North TABLE OF CONTENTS sec6 n Page LIN`I'RODUCTION.................................................................................................................................2 A. APPLICATION...............................................................................................................................2 B. RECOMMENDATION................................................. ....................................... - ......................... 2 H. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCL,USIONS................................................................................2 A. SITE DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................2 B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)................................................................... ....3 C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE...............................................3 D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.....................................................................................................................5 III. ATTACHMENTS..............................................................................................................................6 V. PARTIES OF RECORD...................................................................................................................6 City of Edmonds cae Planning Board Packet Page 296 of 333 I. INTRODUCTION A. APPLICATION 1. Applicant: A.D, Shapiro Architects / Marier & Marier, 2. Site Location: 23601 Edmonds Way (Refer to Attachment 1), 3, Request: Application for a rezone from "Neighborhood Business" (BN) to "Community Business — Edmonds Way" (BC-EW) (see Attachment 2). 4. Review Process: Rezone - Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for final decision, 5. Major Issues: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.40 (REZONES). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.100 (HEARING EXAMINER, PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL REVIEW). B. RECOMMENDATION Based on Findings of Fact, Analysis, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report, staff recommends that the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to APPROVE the requested rezone to "Community Business -- Edmonds Way" (BC-EW), II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. SITE DESCRIPTION 1. Site Development and Zoning a. Facts: (1) Size and Shape: The area under review is on the south side of 236"' Street SW and on the east side of Edmonds Way (SR-104). The site is approximately 0.60 acres in size and has about 210 feet of frontage along Edmonds Way and about 160 feet of frontage along 236"' Street SW. (2) Land Use: The eastern parcel is undeveloped, while the western parcel is vacant but had previously been developed with a self -serve diesel gas station. (3) Zoning: Current zoning of the subject properties is Neighborhood Business (BN) as shown on the vicinity map (see Attachment 1). R-2007-53 P13-S(g1JIZepor1.doe Packet Page 297 of 333 Page 2 2. Neighboring Development and Zoning a. Facts: (1) North: Both single family development and commercial development lay north of the property across 236"' Street SW in Unincorporated Snohomish County (see Attachment I ). (2) East: Properties immediately east are zoned Multiple Residential (RM-1.5). Slightly further east begins an area of Single-family Residential (RS-8). (3) South: An area of Community Business (BC) is adjacent to the south (see Attachment 1). (4) West: Properties to the west across Edmonds Way are zoned RM- 1.5 (with one parcel zoned BN) and consist of primarily multi- family development. B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) 1. Fact: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on August 14, 2007, for the change in zoning (see Attachment 3). 2. Conclusion: SEPA requirements have been satisfied for the proposed change in ,zoning. C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE 1. ECDC Section 20.40 (Rezones) a. Facts: (i) The BC-EW zoning classification is included in Attachment 4 for reference. (ii) The applicant has submitted material in support of their application (see Attachment 2). Their discussion addresses the factors to be considered for a change in zoning. (iii) Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.40.010 provides that, at a minimum, the following factors shall be considered in reviewing an application for a rezone: (1) Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and, (2) Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; and, (3) Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; and, (4) Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone: and, R-2007-53 PH-Staff?eporl.doc Packet Page 298 of 333 Page 3 (5) Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning; and (6) Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. b. Analysis: (i) Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as part of the "Edmonds Way Corridor." The existing BN and the proposed BC-EW zones are consistent with that designation. [2007 Comprehensive flan, pg. 16] Also refer to the additional discussion under ILD, below. (H) Zoning Ordinance. The purposes of the proposed BC-EW zone are given in ECDC 16.50.005 (see Attachment 4), and are listed below. The proposed BC-EW zone is specifically intended for application within the Edmonds Way Corridor, and is appropriate to be applied when design transitions and buffering can be provided. A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community; B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings; C, To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling units) that support business uses. D. To implement the policies of the Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor. E. To meet the goals of the Growth Management Act and the City of Edmonds` Comprehensive Plan for housing diversity and economical vitality. (iii) Surrounding Area. The site is located generally along SR-104. There are a mix of uses, mainly comprised of multi -family and small-scale commercial businesses. (iv) Changes. The trend is toward an overall intensification of uses along SR-104. Further north along Edmonds Way, there are several new areas that have recently been rezoned to BC-EW and they promise a mix of residential and commercial uses similar to this proposal. (v) Suitability. The property in question appears to be economically and physically suitable for development under the proposed BC-EW zone. The SR-104 corridor provides significant opportunities for transit service, and the local topography will help orient future development of the site to SR-104 and 236"' Street SW. K-2007-53.1'13- Staff Report. doc Packet Page 299 of 333 Page 4 (vi) Value. In addition to the increased value that the property owner may realize from the change in zoning, additional value should also be added to the city since, if redevelopment occurs, additional small-scale commercial development will be available to residents in the vicinity. The development of additional dwelling units and employment within areas designated for this type of development supports the City's GMA responsibilities in a way that reduces the potential for additional changes in zoning in areas that don't have the supporting infrastructure or services available. This development will be served by a high - volume arterial and public transit that are necessary to support mixed use development. c. Conclusions: (i) The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the subject property. (ii) The proposed rezone is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance. (iii) Based on the facts and analysis contained above, planning staff concludes that the proposal satisfies the criteria for a change in zoning. D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I. Comprehensive Plan Policies: a. Facts: (i) This site is currently designated as part of the "Edmonds Way Corridor. Relevant policies for the Edmonds Way Corridor include- F. Goals for the Edmonds Way Corridor. The Edmonds Way Corridor consists of portions of Edmonds Way between the IOOth Avenue West intersection and Highway 99. This corridor serves as a key transportation corridor, and also provides a key link between Edmonds and Interstate 5. Established residential areas lie on both sides of the corridor. An established pattern of multiple family residential development lies along much of the corridor, while small-scale businesses can be found primarily near intersections. A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities. F.1. Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. F.2. Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. F.3. Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-1 09 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no./easible alternative. R-2007-53__Pr3-Slaff ?cpor-t. doc Packet Page 300 of 333 Page 5 F.4. Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible. b. Analysis: (i) The Comprehensive Plan Policies noted above encourage the siting of multi -family residential or commercial uses within the Edmonds Way Corridor, so long as traffic impacts and transitions can be addressed, The proposed mixed use Edmonds Way zoning is consistent with the stated intent. C. Conclusions: (i) The proposal is consistent with the policy direction in the Comprehensive Plan, and with the "Edmonds Way Corridor" designation for the subject property. E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE No comments were received from City departments reviewing the proposal. F. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comment letters have been received, although one individual has requested to be added as a party of record and is noted below. III. ATTACHMENTS 1. Comprehensive plan, zoning, and aerial/topo vicinity maps. 2. Supporting material submitted by the applicant. 3. SEPA Determination 4. ECDC zoning regulations for BC-EW zone. V. PARTIES OF RECORD Tony Shapiro Thomas R. Marier Bruce P. Witenberg, P.S. AD Shapiro Architects Marier & Marier BRESKIN & WITENBERG, PLLC 624 Edmonds Way 4946 NE 193`d Street 1301 Fifth Avenue — Suite 2600 Edmonds WA 98020 Lake Forest Park WA 98155 Seattle WA 98101-2618 R-2007-53 P13-Srcrff ?eporl.doc Packet Page 301 of 333 Page 6 ,00 VA A W, WQ, p A, &A, AA IVA "WA IMA 0,;A WA of 44 " Shapiro 1 Marier Rezone w E From BN to BC-EW File Number R-2007-53 s 23601 Edmonds Way Packet Page 303 of 333 rll�,°�� Zoning Vicinity Map 0 100 200 Feet qn, }91� " Shapiro 1 Mader Rezone �1 °p'',,o�� Aerial 1CZlllty p E From BN to BC-EW, File Number R-2007-53� o �o0 20© Feet s 23601 Edmonds Way ,()a I I I I Packet Page 304 of 333 " Shapiro 1 Marier Rezone ` L°10`4 Topo Vicinity Map w F From BN to BC-EW _ File Number R-2007-53 fR 0 50 100 Feet s 23601 Edmonds Way i I I I Packet Page 305 of 333 JUN-22-2007 01:21P FROM:LAURELHURST OIL 2065235286 TO:14257783032 P.1 jullI LLI LuUIInt uL: fit] rfa n, v. , niro Krcn. PAA 00, +tL:) 1 r0 ]L'' r, uu4 x city of edmonds land use application A AaCMTECTURAL BEsraw REviEw 8 CGJ6Mn 91W PLANMIENDMBNr 9 COM MNAL USE MM" e HOME OC'CUPATMN 9 FowuL Sugorvn OlV e SWU SURE StON 0 LOT LINE AntUSTME T 8 PLANVE)RESMO1iALDEVMnPMEM 9 OMaAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT H STRW VACAAON ZREZONE 0 SnoRum Pmzwr e VARIANCE I REASONABLE USE EXCRP MV $ OTFtEa: FILE # zM& B N DATE 7% R=.v BY `mil HEARINO DATE A HE 6 STAFF XPB 8 ADD 0 CC U( -- 005 - 19J I'itOPIMTV ADORMS OR LOCATION 4_f PROJEGTNAM (IF APPLICABLE). PROPERTYOWNBa 1'1�l! �f lllr7�fi" PKQNR ADORM _ E-MAILADDRM -�i i'Y!1,Li'/r°1r�[��cGge-, &M FAX 67.3-52,F& TAX ACCDUW# DO �l%v33003e011O/ SEr- Tom. RNG. Or FRCkW=OR ADDRESS E-MAIL ADDR835 �-�d J� C.OMI'ACTPgRSONIAGINT / l�il,� /il/I,�%� -MAM AnDIM The undo 4MW applicant, and hWhadits hafts, and sgraee to mlease, indcmn4. defend and hold the Cl rdawflAls attornay's fees ar€sitng from any me ft-M inaccurate or incomplete infbmw1oa By lay sere. I Cenify that the info inn an knowledge d that I am authorized to le this �i STONATtJIIR OF APPtdCANTIAGENT Property Owner% Althottxadon f By my �iBrMatuse. ! �' c ' d the e appticaliaa. t my pe o FM' pmpetty f purposes of r pa SIGN OP O 10 appliwtioa harm was revisail on U27100. CAD*mwAMUdS. ft901%ayb\DakxVUW[h0AppMa donAx L/�IL1' � •c4 , � f i� ■r/ L/i/S/L..L: / f LI r � In consideration on the pmcesftS of the application Hands hmalasa fum any and all damages, including 'or} based in wbote or part upon false, tai o ding, Moats tganla or cmptoyam a 'th submitted am two aid comxg to the best of my Ochalf of the ownm• as listed below. DATE 6' 22 -0 ppli t/Agmt to apply for the subjcd land use adyU staff of the City of Bdmenda to ter tho subject t application, DAM ThOnas R. Marier veto Wbe%W it is stilt eutreet, call (425) 771-OM. A tta c hment 2 11"de No. R-07-53 Packet Page 306 of 333 Fdmonds Way, June 22, 2007 Mr. Rob Chave Manager, Planning Division City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave North Edmonds, WA 98020 Wtuonds, WA 98020-4641 Subject: 236th St. SW Rezone to BLEW 23601 Edmonds Way (2 parcels) v: 425.778.5400 >{ :.778.3032 "Itcle iti* 2 2 PERM Z007 'r cot1NTER Request: This rezone request entails rezoning two (2) BN parcels to BGEW for the purpose of building a mined -use commercial and INE residential complex. The related project entails the construction of a project including approximately 10,000 - 15,000 SF of commercial/ office space along with 20 to 40 residential units above a partially below grade parking garage. NARRATIVE ADDRESSING 6 POINT REZONE CRITERIA I. Comprehensive Plan — Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The following summary pulls from the Commercial Land Use section of the Comprehensive Plan. • B.1 Srfcient number of sites suited for commercial uses should be reserved far these purposes. The great majority of such sites should be selected front parcels of land already identified in the comprehensive plan for commercial use and/or.Zoned for such use. Edmonds Way is the primary cast/west access from Interstate 5 and Highway 99 into downtown Edmonds. This arterial has multiple commercial centers and multi -family residential housing along its length with a vast majority of commercial located at the Westgate neighborhood, The proposed Rezone to BLEW will allow for an eventual mixed -use building project that will house one to two levels of commercial; building below or partially below grade parking for both residential and commercial office space, along with two or two and one half levels of residential above the ground floor commercial level. The subject parcels have an Edmonds Way Corridor designation under the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. Our proposal will have a minimum impact on the adjacent single-family properties to the east from a traffic, light, glare, and noise vantage point. A grade change of approximately 5' to 8' feet from Edmonds Way east will also help to provide separation between the project and neighboring parcels. Packet Page 307 of 333 Mr. Rob Cleave Mixed -Use Rezone Request June 22, 2007 Page 2 • B.3 the prol feration of step commercial areas along Edmonds streets and highways and the development Of commercial uses poorly related to surmunding land uses should be strong discouraged. Situated on the corner of Edmonds Way and 236dh St. SW, the proposed project will be located off of Edmonds Way, on a lot that was previously occupied by a gas station. The primary commercial office space will be located on the ground level, with orientation towards Edmonds Way, serving as busy thoroughfare to F ighway99. The residential component will include mid -range residential condominiums located above the ground floor, with a mix of commercial and residential on the 2-d floor and possibly two floors above to a maximum of 4 floors, for a total of 2-1/2 floors residential units. The project then will provide a mix of both. office space and residential units -- the uses most desired for the Edmonds Way Corridor. • B.4: Design and location of all commercial sites should provide for convenient and safe access far customer employees and suppliers. The proposed rezone would maintain Edmonds Way as a street with a commercial, institutional and residential orientation. We propose that the residential garage entry have access for both commercial and residential from 236fh St. Pedestrian access for both commercial and residential could come from both Edmonds Way and 236=h St. However, residential vehicle access would come primarily from 23&h St. • B.5: All commercial developments should be carefully located and designed to eliminate or minimi �e the adverse impacts of heavy traffic volume and other related problems on surrounding land uses. A BGEW designation permits 0' setback from the front property line. Our proposal will hold the building edge off of the property line paralleling Edmonds Way to at least a 4' setback on the ground level to help maintain a line of sight along Edmonds Way. Greater setbacks of at least 6' will occur at the stories above ground level. II. Zoning Ordinance -- Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. BC-EW Zone: • A. To provide far areas for commercial uses offering various goods and services according to the different geographical areas and various categories of customers they serve, Along the Edmonds Way Corridor there is an established pattern of small businesses located among residential parcels. Our proposal would continue this trend and add multi -family housing and office space as the commercial component, all within the same building. Packet Page 308 of 333 Mr. Rob Chave Mined -Use Rezone Request June 22, 2007 Page 3 • B. To provide for areas where commercial uses may concentrate for the convenience of the puhlic and in mutualybeneficial relationships to each other, - The location of this site is ideally suited for commercial spaces which will serve both the residents nearby and pedestrians along Edmonds Way. The project will also serve customers from the greater Edmonds area. • C. To provide for residential user, communidy facilities and institutions, which may appropriateylo,,ate in commercial areas; Our proposed project will provide both residential and commercial facilities, which will augment and increase the residential and commercial diversity already found along Edmonds Wayand 236th Street. The site is also situated on a portion of Edmonds Waythat is in closer proximity to other commercial uses nearby. The location is especially suitable for higher densityhousing and mixed -use projects including a housing component. • D. To require adegarate landscaping and of street parking and loading facilities; While we have not designed the proposed facility yet, the project will include street front landscaping, to supplement the commercial aspect of the development. We will propose below grade parking, and street level garbage pick up/delivery off of 236�h. This will enable us to minimize loading and service truck access from Edmonds Way. • E. To protect commercial uses firm ha.Zards such as fire, explosion and noxious dimes, and also nuisances created by industrial uses such as noise, odor, dust, dirt, smoke, vibration, heat, glare and heavy trueh traffic. The development will have at least a 4' setback from Edmonds Way, with the upper levels having an additional 6' setback The proposed development will limit vehicle traffic to two entrance/exit locations off of Edmonds Way, and the main entrance to the residential uses and garage from 236th Street. 111. Surrounding Area: — the relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property. Should the subject parcel be rezoned for this specific building use, it will mesh with the immediate neighborhood in the following ways: • The proposed mixed -use building will maintain a minimum 4" setback from the Edmonds Way street edge, with further setbacks in the upper stories. Additional. setbacks conforming to BGEW code will be established along the eastern boundary. Packet Page 309 of 333 Mr. Rob Chave Mixed -Use Rezone Request June 22, 2007 Page 4 • The surrounding land uses include residential (both multi family as well as single famil)), various commercial uses and service functions. The proposed project will house uses of a life nature, which will support and enhance the character of the existing neighborhood. • Public traffic to and from the project would be off of Edmonds Way with the possibility of an entrance on 236=h Street. • We foresee only a small service function, (delivery and garbage pick up), occurring off of 236ch St. IV. Changes: — whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in City policy to justify the rezone. The surrounding area, along Edmonds Way, has many different commercial, multi -family, and institutional complexes already in existence. We feel that granting a rezone to BGEW will enable us to continue this trend toward higher density within the context of a residential area while also adding commercial and office space to serve the local community. V. Suitability: — whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. The proximity of this property to the main arterial into Edmonds, :makes this property more suitable for a commercial use than many other areas in Edmonds. However many of the nearby and adjacent properties have been built out as residential, and Edmonds is primarily a residential/small business community. We believe that the proposed mix of both residential and commercial achieves the best and highest use for this property in serving the needs of the community and enables our client to achieve the highest economic return for his investment. Because of its location on the busier Edmonds Way, this site is especially suitable for higher density W housing in close proxitnityto commercial than most other SF residential oriented areas in Edmonds. Vl. Value: — the relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. Edmonds Way is an active thoroughfare and the existing zoning would not allow- for the combination of residential and commercial uses as envisioned. It is our contention that the existing designation does not allow the property to take full advantage of its position along Edmonds Way. Our proposed housing configuration will be set above the commercial space with its own parking area. The increased density proposed would also help Edmonds comply with the GMA. mandates that call for denser housing that has access to bus and transit lines. Packet Page 310 of 333 7J 3 N td n a Packet Page 311 of 333 UI f A Ul 3 ill D z � A c] l7 C n 71 I— A D A Z A n H s�Rehtg115: - 236th Si..Re7one —^..._. architects ---- --4"1 I:J,��ond. le'.,vH2�lnE.S�, Rtit' a i yye�s 624 Edmond, 1Vq, E'dmomEs, 1VA 99OZO, (425) 7M5400 FAX (425) 778.3332 � pF IibM - CITY OF EDMONDS 4:5 I Rio 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Rezone of two parcels from Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business -Edmonds Way (BC-EW) located on the SE corner of Edmonds Way and 236"' Street SW. Description of proposal indicates the rezone would support a potential mixed use project (commercial and multi -family). File No. R-2007-53, Proponent: A.D. Shapiro Architects. Location of proposal, including street address if any: 23601 Edmonds Way. Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS. The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by August 28, 2007. Project Planner: Gina Coccia, Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than August 28 2007. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on August 14, 2007, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Attachment 3 Page I of 2 I{71e No. R-07-33 SFTA w rERN1fNATION DOC F W07 SETA Packet Page 312 of 333 • Mailed SEPA Determination to properties within 300 feet of the site. • Mailed SEPA Determination and the Environmental Checklist to the following: XX Environmental Review Section XX Edmonds School District No. 15 Brian Department of Ecology 20420 68€hAveng Avenue West P.O. Box 47703 Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX XX CONICAST Outside Plant Engineer, North Region 410 Valley Ave NW 912 Puyallup, WA 98371-3317 XX XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation Attn: Ramin Pazooki SnoKing Developer Services, MS 221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. XX PO Box 330310 Seattle. WA 98133-9710 XX Washington State Dept. of Community, Trade & Economic Development906 Columbia Street SW P.O. Box 48300 XX Olympia, WA 98504-8300 XX DNR SEPA Center XX P.O. Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 XX Snohomish County Planning & Development Services 3000 Rockefeller Everett, WA 98201 Attachments pc: File No. R-2007-53 SEPA Notebook Olympic View Water & Sewer District 23725 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Dean Saksena, Senior Manager Snohomish Co. PUD PO Box 1107 Everett, WA 98206-1107 Kojo Fordjour Department of Transportation Environmental Manager 2911 2"d Ave. Seattle, WA 98121-1081 Applicant: A.D. Shapiro Architects 624 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Owner: Thomas R. Marier 4946 NE 193`d Street Lake Forest Park. WA 98155 Pagc2of2 SEPA D13TFiRMINATION DOC 8'13l0PKdifet Page 313 of 333 Chapter 16.50 BC -- COMMUNITY BUSINESS Sections: 16.50.000 Purposes. 16.50.010 Uses. 16.50.020 Site development standards. 16,50.030 Operating restrictions. 16.50.000 BC and BC - Edmonds Way This chapter establishes two distinct zoning categories, BC and BC - Edmonds Way. 16.50.005 Purposes. The BC and the BC - Edmonds Way zones have the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC. A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community; B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings; C. To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling unit(s) that support business uses. D. To implement the policies of the Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor, E. To meet the goals of the Growth Management Act and the City of Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for housing diversity and economical vitality. 16.50.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Single-family dwelling, as regulated in RS-6 zone; Attachment 4 File, No. R-07-53 Packet Page 314 of 333 2. Retail stores, offices and service uses, excluding intense uses, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment sales and services; 3. New automobile sales and service; 4. Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents; 5. Printing, publishing and binding establishments; 6. Bus stop shelters; 7. Community -oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the Edmonds City Code; S. Multiple Dwelling Unit(s). This use may not be located on the ground floor of a structure; 9. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100,020; 10. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 11. Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 11 Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17,100.070. B. Permitted Secondary Uses, 1. Limited assembly, repair or fabrication of goods incidental to a permitted or conditional use; 2. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted or conditional use; 3. Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility meeting the criteria listed under subsections (C)(1 1) through (14) of this section, except that the facility may also be located along a designated transit route in addition to an arterial or collector street. Packet Page 315 of 333 C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. I . Commercial parking lots; 2. Wholesale uses; 3. Hotels and motels; 4 Amusement establishments; 5 Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions; 6. Drive-in businesses; 7. Laboratories; 8 Fabrication of light industrial products; 9. Convenience stores; 10. Day-care centers; 11. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums; 12. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85,033; 13. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers; 14. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100,070, D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Perm it. 1. Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted or conditional use; 2. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC. 16.50.020 Site development standards. Packet Page 316 of 333 A. Table. Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Lot Area Lot Width Side Rear Height Height Floor Area Setback Setback Setback 3 sq. ft. per BC None None None None' None' 25 z sq. ft. of lot area BC- 3 sq, ft. per Edmonds None None None None' None' 353' 4 sq.ft. of lot Way area ' The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings and structures entirely below the surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line adjacent to residentially (R) zoned property. ' Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height are modulated in design and are designed as a hip, gable, arch, shed or other similar roof form (see illustrations). Vertical parapet walls or flat roofs with a pitch of less than 3-in-12 are not allowed to protrude above the 25-foot height limit unless they are part of an approved modulated design. 3 The stated height limit may be increased to 46 feet provided that: (a) The street setback of any proposed building shall be increased to 4 feet in depth. Type ]ll landscaping shall be located within this setback. This landscaping may be located immediately adjacent to the building, or may be combined with other landscaping within or adjoining the right of way. In addition, the third and forth stories of any proposed building shall be further stepped back an additional 6 feet from the street frontage along all street fronts; (b) Where the proposed development abuts a single-family residential (RS) zoned property, in addition to complying with subsection (a), the proposed development shall modulate the design of any building facades facing the single-family residentially (RS) zoned property; (c) The proposed development integrates low impact development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of bioswales, green roofs, and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based upon the physical characteristics of the property and its suitability for the technique; cost alone shall not render the use of low impact techniques unreasonable or unfeasible. (d) The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with Type l landscaping permanently maintained by the owner of the BC, lot; and Packet Page 317 of 333 (e) For any buildings fronting on Edmonds Way, the maximum height of the wall or facade along Edmonds Way shall not exceed 45 feet as measured at the Edmonds Way property line. 4 In addition to any height bonus under note 3, the building may extend up to an additional five feet if all portions of the building above the height limit (alter adding the height bonus under note 3) integrate distinctive architectural features that enhance and are integrated into the overall design of the building. For purposes of this section, distinctive architectural features may include articulation, changes of materials, offsets, angles or curves of facades, or by the use of distinctive roof forms, ■aP 1IL11SS t, ■ `� w D ■I■ M ■ ■ a rr! rwwr r�wr II! i r' ■r w w slop i B. Ground Floor. Development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial uses to a minimum depth of 30 feet as measured from the street front of the building, with the following exceptions or clarifications: I. That in all areas the provision of pedestrian access to permitted residential uses is allowed. 2. This provision shall not apply when a single-family use is the primary use on the property. Packet Page 318 of 333 3. With respect to, but only to, property located on the Fifth Avenue entrance corridor, south of Walnut Street, in which the first 60 feet of the building as measured from Fifth Avenue consists only of commercial uses; and with respect to which the subject property shares a property line with a single-family or multifamily zoned properties, then multifamily units may be located on the ground floor in such a manner that they face the adjacent residentially zoned property. 4. In the BC - Edmonds Way zone, where the street frontage of the total site proposed for development exceeds 150 feet in length, this requirement shall apply to only 60% of the ground floor street frontage of any proposed building. The remaining 40% may include any other uses permitted in the BC - Edmonds Way zone, including, but not limited to, off-street parking or live/work space. C. Signs, Parking and Design Review. See Chapters 17.50, 20.10, and 20.60 ECDC. D. Density, There is no maximum density for permitted multiple dwelling units. E. Screening. The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with trees and ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the BC lot. A six-foot minimum height fence, wall or solid hedge shall be provided at some point in the setback. P. Satellite Television Antennas. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050 and reviewed by the architectural design board. 16.50.030 Operating restrictions. A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building, except: 1. Public utilities and parks; 2. Off-street parking and loading areas, and commercial parking lots; 3. Drive-in businesses; 4. Plant nurseries; Packet Page 319 of 333 Seasonal farmers' markets; 6. Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.65 ECDC, B. Nuisances. All uses shall comply with Chapter 17.60 ECDC, Performance Standards. Packet Page 320 of 333 F.4. Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible. b. Analysis: (i) The Comprehensive Plan Policies noted above encourage the siting of multi -family residential or commercial uses within the Edmonds Way Corridor, so long as traffic impacts and transitions can be addressed. The proposed mixed use Edmonds Way zoning is consistent with the stated intent. C. Conclusions; (i) The proposal is consistent with the policy direction in the Comprehensive Plan, and with the "Edmonds Way Corridor" designation for the subject property. E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE No comments were received from City departments reviewing the proposal. F. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comment letters have been received, although one individual has requested to be added as a party of record and is noted below. III. ATTACHMENTS i. Comprehensive plan, zoning, and aerial/topo vicinity maps. 2. Supporting material submitted by the applicant. 3. SEPA Determination 4. ECDC zoning regulations for BC-EW zone. V. PARTIES OF RECORD Tony Shapiro Thomas R. Marier Bruce P. Witenberg, P.S. A.D Shapiro Architects Marier & Marier BRESKIN & WITENBERG, PLLC 624 Edmonds Way 4946 NE 193rd Street 1301 Fifth Avenue -- Suite 2600 Edmonds WA 98020 Lake Forest Park WA 98155 Seattle WA 98101-2618 R-20.07-53_PB-Sta#Report, doc Packet Page 321 of 333 Page 6 PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY YOUR NAME, COMPLETE ADDRESS & ZIP CODE IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK OR BE NOTIFIED OF FUTURE HEARINGS ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. FILE NO.: R-07-53 SHAPIRO Packet Page 322 of 333 AM-1200 6. Frances Anderson Center Seismic Structural Retrofit Project Award Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: 10/16/2007 Submitted By: Kim Karas Submitted For: Noel Miller Time: 15 Minutes Department: Public Works Type: Action Review Committee: Finance Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Award of a construction contract to Northwestern Construction of WA, Inc. in the amount of $1,610,631.00 (price includes Washington State sales tax) for the Frances Anderson Center Seismic Structural Retrofit project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Appropriate an additional $917,500.00 from Fund 126-Parks Acquisition and award a construction contract to Northwestern Construction of WA, Inc. in the amount of $1,610,631.00 including Washington State sales tax for the Frances Anderson Center Seismic Structural Retrofit project. The Finance Committee on October 9, 2007 recommended approval of the project plan and forwarding it to full Council for discussion at the October 16, 2007 City Council meeting. Previous Council Action On June 27, 2007 the City Council authorized staff to advertise for bids for this project. On August 7, 2007, the Council authorized staff to re -advertise for this project since there were no bids received from the initial advertisement. On October 9, 2007 the Finance Committee recommended that this project be funded and a construction contract awarded due to the projects importance and the availability of federal grant funding from FEMA. On October 9, 2007, the Finance Committee approved the project plan and recommended forwarding it to full Council for discussion at the October 16, 2007 City Council meeting. Narrative Bids were opened on October 1, 2007 with one (1) contractor submitting a bid. The responsive low bidder is Northwestern Construction of WA, Inc. with a bid of $1,610,631.00. The Engineer's estimate, prepared in June 2007, was $1,599,799.00. The contractor's references are positive with no performance issues. Other contractors chose not to bid due to current job commitments. In order to proceed with this project and award a construction contract, the required funding for this project is calculated as follows: EXPENDITURES Preliminary Design $ 28,000.00 Engineering Drawings & Specifications $ 170,000.00 Packet Page 323 of 333 Construction Engineering & Monitoring Materials Testing Services Construction Contract Sales Tax at 8.9 % Construction Contingency at 10% Total Project Costs FEMA Mitigation Grant Committed Bonding Proceeds Total Committed Revenues $ 90,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $1,479,000.00 $ 131,631.00 $ 161,069.00 $2,099,700.00 REVENUES $ 782,190.00 $ 400,000.00 $1,182,190.00 The Remaining Expenditures to be funded $ 917,510.00 are: The City Council is aware of the significant escalation of the construction project costs throughout the Puget Sound region since the request for federal grant funding was prepared for this project in February 2005. At that time in order to provide a project cost estimate, average historic cost data compiled by FEMA was used as a basis for this request since no site specific seismic retrofit design work had been prepared for this City facility. Also, the FEMA Mitigation grant program, which is set to expire if funds are not expended by September of 2008, does not allow for the usual practice of adding contingencies for normal project cost escalation. On the positive side, part of the project scope will require the replacement of most of the flat roofs of the building complex. These roofs are in need of replacement within two to three (2-3) years at an approximate cost of $350,000 and this is an additional cost that the City would have to eventually have to budget for in 2009-2010. In discussions with Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director, and Brian McIntosh, Parks and Recreation Director, the most feasible way to finance the unfunded project costs of $917,510.00 is to utilize additional revenues and/or ending cash balances from real estate excise taxes (REET 1). Under current RCWs, using REET 1 (126 Fund) is an allowable use for rehabilitation of a recreational facility. However, it is not allowable to use the REET 2 (125 Fund) for this purpose. Collections through September total approximately $ 1.1 million and the current cash balance for Fund 126 is approximately $1.3 million. If we estimate another $300,000 of REET 1 collections for the remaining three months of the year, receipt of IAC grants in the amount of $600,000, and debt service requirements of $566,000, Finance estimates that there will be a 2007 ending cash balance in Fund 126 slightly in excess of $1.6 million. Fiscal Impact Fiseal Vear_ 2007 Revenue: $2,099700 Packet Page 324 of 333 Expenditure: $2,099700 Fiscal Impact: Fund 126 2007 Ending Cash is reduced to approximately $700,000. Attachments Link: Bid Tabulation Sheet Link: Northwestern Construction of WA, Inc. References Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 03:06 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/11/2007 03:08 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 03:16 PM APRV Form Started By: Kim Started On: 10/09/2007 08:03 Karas AM Final Approval Date:. 10/11/2007 Packet Page 325 of 333 BID TABULATION SHEET ABSTRACT OF QUOTES/BIDS AUTHORIZATION DATE: 8/7/2007 OPENING DATE: October 1, 2007 AWARD DATE: 10/16/2007 Supplies or Services: NAME OF BIDDERS: Remarks FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RETROF 1 2 3 4 Northwestern . onstruction of WA, In Originating Office: Public Works Department: Public Works ITEM 1 Lump Sum Base Bid $1,479,000.00 2 3 Sales Tax Percentage Rate 8.9% WA State Sales Tax $131,631.00 TOTAL $1,610,631.00 Bid Deposit 5% Bid Signed Yes Delivery N/A Warranty 1 Year Rec'd Addenda if Required Yes Is this product a WA State Contract item? Yes No 1/ Indicate vendors from above listing who have previously provided services or products to the City and indicate whether the results were satisfactory or unsatisfactory: None Recommended Awardee: Northwestern Construction of WA, Inc. Low Bid That Is Unacceptable: N/A **** I certify that all bids received in response to the invitation were opened, read, and recorded according to curent requirements. **** Agent for the City of Edmonds: Note: Indicate N/A in each of the above categories that does not apply to the bid being presented. Packet Page 326 of 333 BID TABULATION SHEET ABSTRACT OF QUOTES/BIDS AUTHORIZATION DATE: OPENING DATE: October 1, 2007 AWARD DATE: Supplies or Services: NAME OF BIDDERS: FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RETROF 5 6 7 8 Remarks Originating Office: Public Works Department: Public Works ITEM 1 Lump Sum Base Bid 2 3. Sales Tax Percentage Rate 8.9% WA State Sales Tax TOTAL Bid Deposit Bid Signed Delivery Warranty Rec'd Addenda if Required Is this product a WA State Contract item? Yes No Indicate vendors from above listing who have previously provided services or products to the City and indicate whether the results were satisfactory or unsatisfactory: Recommended Awardee: Low Bid That Is Unacceptable: **** I certify that all bids received in response to the invitation were opened, read, and recorded according to curent requirements. **** Agent for the City of Edmonds: Note: Indicate N/A in each of the above categories that does not apply to the bid being presented. L:\Productiondb\CCOUNCIL\0039-1200—Bid Tabulation Sheet.xls Packet Page 327 of 333 Northwestern Construction Reference Checks Warranty Work Company & Schedule Effective Change Order and Follow Contact Quality of Work Compliance Communication Management Through Mead School Dist. - John Dormaier* 4-5 4 5 5 5+ Spokane School Dist. - Carl Pearson** 4 3 3 4 3.5 SCALE: 1 = Poor, 5 = Superlative * contacted 10:00 a.m.10-4-07 at 509-465-7674 - done many jobs with Northwestern for last 8-10 years ** contacted 9:00 a.m. 10-5-07 at 509-354-5772 - seemed a tough grader during conversation. Packet Page 328 of 333 AM-1203 Report on City Council Committee Meetings Edmonds City Council Meeting Date: Submitted By: Department: Review Committee: Action: 10/ 16/2007 Sandy Chase City Clerk's Office Time: 15 Minutes Type: Information Information Subject Title Report on City Council Committee Meetings. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached are copies of the following City Council Committee Meeting Minutes: 1. 10-09-07 Community/Development Services Committee Meeting 2. 10-09-07 Finance Committee Meeting 3. 10-09-07 Public Safety Committee Meeting Link: 10-09-07 CSDS Minutes Link: 10-09-07 Finance Minutes Link: 10-09-07 Public Safety Minutes Fiscal Impact A ++o�hmnn+a Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 08:38 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/11/2007 08:47 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/11/2007 08:57 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Started On: 10/10/2007 03:01 Chase PM Final Approval Date: 10/11/2007 7. Packet Page 329 of 333 Community Services/Development Services Committee Meeting October 9, 2007 Elected Officials Present: Staff Present: Richard Marin, Committee Chair Sandy Chase, City Clerk Mauri Moore, Councilmember Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Committee Chair Marin convened the meeting at 6:05 p.m. A. Discussion regarding expanding the membership of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission. Councilmember Michael Plunkett presented the topic to the committee. He explained that the members of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission each serve on subcommittees that meet on a regular basis in addition to the Commission meetings. He noted there is a lot of work involved with this Commission. Due to the workload and because there is usually three or four people applying for openings on the Commission, the Commission would like the Council to consider expanding the official membership. The Commission would like to expand the citizens -at -large membership from four to six. This would increase the composition of the overall Commission from seven to nine. Both Councilmembers Marin and Moore supported the increase in the membership. ACTION: The CS/DS Committee requested that an ordinance be drafted expanding the membership of the citizens -at -large from four to six, thereby increasing the composition of the overall Commission from seven to nine. The Committee requested the ordinance be brought back for a brief discussion before the full Council. The confirmation of new Commission members should be scheduled on the next Council meeting agenda after the Ordinance has been adopted by Council. The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:12 p.m. Packet Page 330 of 333 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 9, 2007 6:00 PM Present: Councilmember Ron Wambolt Councilmember Peggy Pritchard Olson Staff: Mayor Gary Haakenson Sandy Chase Kathleen Junglov Jim Stevens Brian McIntosh Dan Clements Committee Chair Orvis called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. Item A: Copying Fees Committee members were presented with an up -dated resolution covering fees for photocopying and transcribing City records. It was the Committee's consensus to move the resolution to the full Council as a consent item. Item B: Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit Brian McIntosh and Jim Stevens reviewed the history of bids for the Anderson Center seismic retrofit. After receiving no bids this past summer, the project was re -bid, and one responsible response was received. It was the Committee's consensus to recommend approval of the bid award, and forward to Council for their approval. The Committee also requested that the Agenda Memo be modified to include wording: 1.) As to why Fund 125, rather than Fund 126 will be used as the funding source, and 2.) The time sensitivity of the FEMA grant. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 PM. V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\2007 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES\FINANCE - 071009.DOC Packet Page 331 of 333 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting October 9, 2007 Committee Members Present: Council member Deanna Dawson, Chair Council member Michael Plunkett Staff Present: Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg Assistant Fire Chief Mark Correira Guests: Mayor Haakenson joined the meeting in progress The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. A. Paramedic Training Affiliation Agreement Assistant Chief Correira reviewed information contained in Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo AM-1174. Since 2003, the Department has sent three Firefighters to Harborview Medical Center (HMC) for paramedic training. Two more are currently enrolled. Due to the association between HMC and the University of Washington, agencies that send students to training are required to enter into an affiliation agreement prepared by the State Attorney General's Office. As with the initial 2003 document, the updated agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Action: Forward with a recommendation to approve to the City Council Consent Agenda requesting authorization for the Mayor to sign the University of Washington / Harborview Medical Center Affiliation Agreement With Edmonds Fire Department B. Edmonds Emergency Physicians Indemnification Agreement In a late development, Assistant Chief Correira advised the Committee that the Edmonds Emergency Physicians rescinded their interest in being indemnified and that this item should be removed from the agenda. C. Agreement for Supervisory Services — Fire Department Medical Program Director Assistant Chief Correira reviewed information contained in Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo AM-1196. The Department has an existing agreement for supervisory services with a physician employed by Edmonds Emergency Physicians (EEP), the group of affiliated doctors who staff the Stevens Hospital Emergency Department 24/7. After eight years of serving as the Fire Department's Medical Program Director (MPD), Dr. James Mercer, a member of that group, is stepping down and Dr. Richard Campbell, also from EEP, will assume the MPD position (See AM-1195). The agreement for supervisory services with Dr. Campbell was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney; however, after submittal to the City Clerk, Dr. Campbell requested the following modification: Section 1.3's reference to "Ride -Along with the Paramedics" is changed to "A format mutually agreed to by the contractor and Edmonds." The Department feels this change is insignificant, but intends to bring it to the attention of the City Attorney. The Department is seeking Public Safety Committee approval to forward the document to the Council Consent Packet Page 332 of 333 Agenda, but will not do so until Dr. Campbell's proposed modification is reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Action: Forward with a recommendation to approve to the City Council Consent Agenda requesting authorization for the Mayor to sign the Agreement for Supervisory Services Between The City of Edmonds and Richard J. Campbell, M.D. Meeting adjourned at 6:07 p.m. Packet Page 333 of 333