The URL can be used to link to this page

2008.02.08 CC Agenda Packet AGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds ______________________________________________________________ February 5, 2008 6:30 p.m. - Executive Session regarding labor negotiations. 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute 1.Approval of Agenda 2.Approval of Consent Agenda Items A.Roll Call B. AM-1379 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of January 22, 2008. C. AM-1390 Approval of claim checks #101779 through #101927 in the amount of $1,493,618.80 for January 24, 2008, and approval of #101928 through #102061 in the amount of $197,575.82 for January 31, 2008. D. AM-1378 Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Terry A. Stowers (amount undetermined). E. AM-1363 Traffic Impact Fee Annual Report. F. AM-1388 Final approval of a 17 lot townhouse subdivision known as COOPER'S CREST located at 8016 - 8024 212th Street SW. (Applicant: Scott Schlumberger of Michel Properties, Inc.) G. AM-1385 Approval of Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Union Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters. H. AM-1384 Approval of 2008 Taxicab Operator's License for North End Taxi. I. AM-1375 Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city vehicles and equipment. J. AM-1391 Authorization for Mayor to sign revised Fiber Broadband Agreement with Edmonds School District. K. AM-1387 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, opposing commercial air passenger and other incompatible air service at Paine Field located within Snohomish County. L. AM-1392 Countywide Transportation Benefit District. 3. AM-1386 (5 Min) Proclamation in honor of Arts Day 2008. 4. AM-1376 (20 Min) Informational presentation by City of Lynnwood staff on their Olympic View Drive improvements project. 5. AM-1389 (45 Min) Closed record appeal of the Hearing Examiner’s denial of two street setback variances at 24110 84th Avenue West in the Multiple-Residential (RM-2.4) zone. Appellant and Applicant: Shaun Leiser (Files V-2007-81 & AP-2008-1). Packet Page 1 of 415 6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 7. AM-1377 (15 Min) Adoption of Interim Zoning Ordinance amending the definition of Local Public Facility. 8. (5 Min)Mayor's Comments 9. (15 Min)Council Comments 10.Adjourn Packet Page 2 of 415 AM-1379 2.B. Approval of 01-22-08 City Council Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of January 22, 2008. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 01-22-08 Draft City Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:12 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/28/2008 11:17 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 01:20 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 01/28/2008 11:10 AM Final Approval Date: 01/28/2008 Packet Page 3 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES January 22, 2008 Following a Special Meeting at 6:15 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding labor negotiations and to interview a candidate for the Planning Board at 6:45 p.m., the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Michael Plunkett, Council President Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember Steve Bernheim, Councilmember D. J. Wilson, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Hilary Scheibert, Student Representative STAFF PRESENT Al Compaan, Police Chief Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director Dave Gebert, City Engineer Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Haakenson relayed Councilmember Wilson’s request to add a resolution regarding the stewardship of Lake Ballinger and the development of a Lake Ballinger Basin Action Plan to the agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER WITH THE ADDITION OF A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE STEWARDSHIP OF LAKE BALLINGER AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LAKE BALLINGER BASIN ACTION PLAN AS ITEM 8B. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2008. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #101580 THROUGH #101778 FOR JANUARY 17, 2008, IN THE AMOUNT OF $392,126.59. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #46128 THROUGH #46178 FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 THROUGH JANUARY 15, 2008, IN THE AMOUNT OF $759,769.50. D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM HANNA KROL (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED). Packet Page 4 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 2 E. COMMUNITY SERVICES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY REPORT – JANUARY 2008. F. STEVENS HOSPITAL BROADBAND AGREEMENT. 3. CONFIRMATION OF PLANNING BOARD CANDIDATE MICHAEL MESTRES. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO CONFIRM THE MAYOR’S APPOINTMENT OF MICHAEL MESTRES AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE PLANNING BOARD. Council President Plunkett commented the last time the City advertised for the Planning Board was 10 to 11 months ago. He recalled the Historic Preservation Commission’s (HPC) decision to re-advertise for positions when 60-90 days elapsed between when the positions were advertised and candidates interviewed and the selection process. As this applicant was interviewed for another board 10 to 11 months ago and the Planning Board alternate position had not been re-advertised, he supported the HPC's practice of re-advertising when a sufficient amount of time elapsed between advertising the position and the appointment. Councilmember Bernheim recalled his previous statement that he would oppose confirmation of a candidate that was selected without a public opportunity to apply. He assured this was in no way related to the merits of the candidate, recognizing Mr. Mestres’ dedication to the community. To avoid setting a precedent and to ensure a fair process, he supported re-advertising the position. He noted there may be more interest in the Planning Board position now in view of issues coming before the Planning Commission such as the waterfront development. He noted there was adequate time to re-advertise the position because there was no immediate need to appoint an alternate. He cited the importance of reaching out to the community, encouraging diversity, being open to feedback/input and including all who want to participate. He expressed concern that the December 12 Planning Board minutes included an announcement that Mr. Mestres would be the new Planning Board alternate, noting this was a week before Mr. Mestres submitted his application for the position. Councilmember Wambolt referred to his comments at the last meeting regarding the process of the Council confirming the Mayor’s appointment. He echoed the comments of Council President Plunkett and Councilmember Bernheim, advising he would not support the motion. Councilmember Dawson commented this may be more appropriate if the Council needed to move quickly to make an appointment or if interviews of other candidates had been conducted recently. She noted the lack of urgency as the alternate had been moved up to fill a vacancy on the Planning Board. She referred to the Council’s interview with Mr. Mestres, anticipating he would make a very fine alternate to the Planning Board. However, she supported delaying confirmation of the Mayor’s appointment and re- advertising the position. She agreed it was a bad precedent to set to not allow members of the public to apply for a vacancy on the Planning Board and urged the Council not to approve the confirmation. She noted this action did not necessarily mean she would not support confirmation of Mr. Mestres in the future; she wanted the position advertised to provide the community an opportunity to apply. Councilmember Wilson observed the Council agreed Mr. Mestres was well qualified and interested in the community. He was pleased to hear the Council’s discussion regarding process but was sensitive to how Boards, Commissions and the Council treated citizens who participated in a volunteer capacity. He recognized Mr. Mestres’ willingness to volunteer and participate and felt the Council would be remiss in not confirming Mayor Haakenson’s appointment. He pointed out the difficulty finding citizens to participate on Boards and Commissions. He summarized the Council would be missing a tremendous opportunity and losing sight of qualifications in the name of process if they did not confirm Mr. Mestres’ appointment to the Planning Board. Packet Page 5 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 3 Councilmember Olson commented in the four years she had been on the Council, the Council had confirmed appointments to Boards and Commissions with a great deal less interrogation than the Council conducted of Mr. Mestres tonight and had never had a problem in the past. She pointed out Mr. Mestres was Mayor Haakenson’s appointment and in the past he has moved people to another Board/Commission when an opening occurred. She agreed it was often difficult to get people to participate on Boards/Commissions. Since the appointment/confirmation process had not been a problem in the past, she supported the Council’s confirmation of Mr. Mestres tonight. Councilmember Dawson did not object to moving the alternate to the Planning Board. She did not recall a circumstance in the past where a Board/Commission vacancy was not advertised and the Mayor moved a person from one board to another and asked whether it had been a past practice. Mayor Haakenson explained it had been done several times before. In response to Council President Plunkett’s comments regarding appointments to the HPC, he pointed out there were vast differences between the HPC and the Planning Board; the HPC was a Council committee formed by the Council who interview their own candidates and recommend their selection to him for appointment. The Planning Board provides recommendations to the Council and the code identifies how appointments are made. He indicated he was unaware that an announcement regarding Mr. Mestres’ appointment to the alternate position was made to the Planning Board in December. Mayor Haakenson read from his memo to the Council regarding the appointment: With the resignation of Janice Freeman in late November 2007 he was given an opportunity to advertise for her replacement to move up the existing alternate. It has been common practice to move the alternate up to a permanent position on the Board when an opening occurred because that person had been at all meetings and read all materials and may have filled in during a Board Member’s absence. He made a decision to fill the vacancy with the current alternate which left a vacancy for the alternate position on the Planning Board. Often when he interviews for open Board positions, applicants express an interest in serving on other boards, not only the one they applied for, and often they may not be appointed to their first choice but due to their desire to serve the community are willing to wait or be considered for another board. Several times during interviews he informs an applicant that although they are a good candidate, someone else is better suited and that he will contact them when there is another opening or he will appoint them to the next vacancy. As he considered his options for filling the vacancy on the Planning Board, he recalled a conversation with current Architectural Design Board (ADB) Member Mike Mestres during his interview for the ADB regarding his interest in serving on the Planning Board. As there were no vacancies on the Planning Board, Mr. Mestres accepted an appointment to the ADB. When the alternate position arose, Mayor Haakenson contacted Mr. Mestres regarding his interest in switching Boards and Mr. Mestres reiterated his desire to serve on the Planning Board. Mr. Mestres now had the experience of working with City planning staff, working within a group framework and an understanding of City procedures. He noted current Planning Board Member Jim Young also served on the ADB and Planning Board and that experience had been beneficial to the Planning Board. Rather than take a month to gather candidates and conduct interviews and without knowing the quality of candidates, he chose to appoint a known quantity to the Planning Board. Mayor Haakenson asked that Mr. Mestres be interviewed before last week’s Council meeting; at Council President Plunkett’s request, the interview was delayed until tonight. Mayor Haakenson reiterated Mr. Mestres was his choice to fill the alternate position on the Planning Board. He summarized this process had been used several times over the past eight years. He disagreed with the Council’s statement regarding the lack of urgency, pointing out the importance of appointing an alternate as the alternate filled in for absent Board Members more often than many realized. Packet Page 6 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 4 Councilmember Dawson asked whether there had been occasions in the past where a vacancy on the ADB or Planning Board was not announced to the public and without conducting interviews. Mayor Haakenson answered when vacancies arose, he often reviewed applications that had been submitted previously and contacted the applicants to inquire regarding their interest. Councilmember Dawson asked whether Mr. Mestres applied for a Planning Board vacancy in the past. Mayor Haakenson did not recall which Board he applied for but recalled his interest in both the ADB and the Planning Board. Councilmember Bernheim was interested in establishing a cooperative and collegial process where all citizens felt they had an opportunity for input and had been fairly heard. He felt this was the antithesis of that process and bred distrust and instead of proceeding, the Council was bickering about process. He referred to the statement in Mayor Haakenson’s memo that many times he told qualified candidates that he will consider them again or that he will appoint them to the next vacancy, noting the Mayor did not have the ability to appoint someone to a Board, the Mayor only nominated the candidate and the Council confirmed or rejected his appointment. Mayor Haakenson replied he used the wrong word by stating appoint. Council President Plunkett commented the Council was being asked to confirm the appointment of a citizen who was interviewed for the ADB nine months ago. He recognized a great deal had happened during the intervening nine months including the waterfront development. He reiterated the HPC advertised all vacancies and recommended the Council do the same. He expressed concern with making an appointment when the process had not been reopened to the other members of the public who may be interested. Councilmember Olson commented this was disingenuous as Mr. Mestres was the Mayor’s recommendation. She recognized the position could be advertised and Mayor Haakenson could interview other applicants; however, he had already made a decision with regard to his nomination to serve on the Planning Board, a very qualified individual and an individual the Council confirmed to serve on the ADB. She noted it may make sense to re-advertise if the Council interviewed the applicants or if this applicant was not qualified. Councilmember Wambolt advised he planned to propose at the Council retreat that the process used to select an Economic Development Director be used to select Board Members - a group of people including Councilmembers interview all the candidates. Mayor Haakenson replied once the code was changed, he would be thrilled to turn over to the Council the opportunity to interview Board and Commission candidates. Councilmember Wilson recognized the sincerity in the Council’s discussion, noting there were appropriate times to check the power of the executive in the City’s system of government. He recalled citizens’ comments during the campaign season that the Council was not doing an effective job of providing leadership. He summarized this was not an appropriate time to pick a fight with the Mayor over executive power nor an appropriate issue to provide Council leadership when there were other important issues on the agenda. He cautioned the Council there were more important issues to spend their energies on than nominations to Boards. Councilmember Dawson commented there were few things more important than selecting Planning Board Members in view of the important decisions made by the Planning Board. She asked whether an interim appointment to the alternate position could be made while the public process occurred. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the Council had not adopted procedures; therefore, it was at the Council’s discretion. The Council could delay the motion, vote for or against it. If the motion were delayed or failed, Councilmembers could encourage the Mayor to adopt another process or the Council could adopt a process as a result of discussion at the retreat. Packet Page 7 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 5 Councilmember Dawson commented this discussion may be a moot point, asking whether Mayor Haakenson could view all candidates fairly or if he would return with the same candidate. Mayor Haakenson acknowledged now may not be a good time to ask that question. Councilmember Dawson recalled the Council had discussed the process of Council confirmation of the Mayor’s appointments, at least allowing a week between the interview and confirmation and was surprised to see the interview and confirmation scheduled on this week’s agenda. Mayor Haakenson advised it was on tonight’s agenda due to Council President Plunkett’s comment at last week’s meeting that the issue would be discussed at the retreat and for now the Council would continue to follow the existing procedures. Councilmember Dawson observed the interview/confirmation should have been delayed until the Council discussed appointment procedures at the retreat. She suggested Councilmember Wilson withdraw the motion until the Council had an opportunity to have that discussion at the retreat. Council President Plunkett commented the issue last week was voting to confirm a Board Member immediately following the interview; tonight’s discussion was in regard to advertising for a Board position. He advised the interview/confirmation was placed on the agenda at the request of the administration; he would have preferred to delay the matter. Councilmember Wilson declined to withdraw his motion, noting the sincere energy in the debate warranted a vote. MOTION FAILED (2-4-1), COUNCILMEMBER WILSON AND COUNCILMEMBER OLSON IN FAVOR; COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT, AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, WAMBOLT AND BERNHEIM OPPOSED; AND COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON ABSTAINED. 4. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF MENTORING MONTH, JANUARY 2008. Councilmember Dawson read a proclamation declaring January 2008 National Mentoring Month in Edmonds and encouraging all citizens, City employees and caring adults to become involved as mentors. She presented the proclamation to Eddie Tadlot, General Manager, Lynnwood Convention Center and member of the Board of Directors of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Snohomish County, and Cory Armstrong-Hoss, Interim Director, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Snohomish County. Councilmember Dawson, member of the Board of Directors of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Snohomish County, commended the Big Brothers Big Sisters program, noting when she was a Big Sister to a Little Sister, the experience was as great for her as it was her Little Sister. On behalf of the Board of Directors, Mr. Tadlot thanked the City for recognizing the great work of Big Brothers Big Sisters in Snohomish County. He reported there were over 52 children in the Edmonds area with a Big Brother or Big Sister who have enjoyed over 3,000 hours of one-on-one time with a mentor. He noted 330 people in the Edmonds community had inquired about becoming a Big Brother or Big Sister. He recognized Officer Steve Morrison who has been a Big Brother for eleven years and was currently mentoring his third Little Brother. He commented on the backgrounds of the children served by the Big Brothers or Big Sisters, noting 80% were from single parent families. 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN UPDATED 2008 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FOR THE EXPENDITURE, BUT ONLY IN THE EXPENDITURE, OF FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) 5309 FUNDS RECEIVED THROUGH THE EDMONDS CROSSING GRANT APPLICATION WA-03-0209. Community Services Director/Acting Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton advised the update changed only the goal percentage for soliciting disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE). The 10% goal adopted in 2005 was being updated to 9.27%. He explained the Office of Women and Minority Business Enterprises provides the City a list of disadvantaged business enterprises in the Edmonds market Packet Page 8 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 6 taken from the North American Industry Classification System. This was related specifically to Phase 2 of the Edmonds Crossing project. Businesses participating in Phase 2 include landscape architects, architects, land acquisition surveyors, etc. The list of 374 disadvantaged businesses enterprises the City received from the Office of Women and Minority Business Enterprises was the numerator for the formula used in calculating the percentage; the dominator was all businesses in the North American Industry Classification System (4,035). He reiterated there were no changes to the program other than the percentage. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide comment and Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1163. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. REPORT FROM CHRIS KEUSS, PORT OF EDMONDS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ON THE HARBOR SQUARE / ANTIQUE MALL REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Chris Keuss, Port of Edmonds Executive Director, pointed out the Harbor Square/Antique Mall development, referred to by some as the waterfront development, was not located on the waterfront and was actually located east of the railroad tracks. He provided a history on the development, recalling discussion at a September 26, 2006 joint meeting between the Council, Port Commission and staff regarding advantages and challenges associated with development of the Harbor Square, Edmonds Shopping Center (Antique Mall site) and the Skippers property. Advantages cited included the importance of economic vitality for Edmonds and this area, linkage and the importance of linking the downtown core to this area and the waterfront, quality of life, employment opportunities via development on the site, and opportunities for shopping, recreation, open space and businesses. Challenges identified at that meeting included the high water table on the site, building heights and modulated buildings, and some Councilmembers recognized there may need to be some flexibility in reviewing the building height issue for this area. No conclusion was reached at the joint meeting but the Council encouraged the property owners to move forward with planning for the area and begin a public process. He paused to introduce Port Commissioner Marianne Burkhart in the audience. Mr. Keuss displayed an aerial photograph, identifying the Harbor Square site, Antique Mall owned by Edmonds Shopping Center (ESC), and the Skippers property originally owned by the McNaughton Group and recently purchased by Bob Gregg. He explained the Port owned six of the buildings on the Harbor Square property but did not own the Harbor Inn or tennis facility. The overall site was approximately 25 acres and included the 10 acre Harbor Square property, the 1 acre Skippers site, and the 3-4 acres Antique Mall site with the remainder being parking lots, rights-of-way, and Burlington Northern and Sound Transit property. He explained the Stratford Company was hired to assist with Phase 1, the pre-planning process, which included identification of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT). LMN Architects was hired to assist with Phase 2, the logistical phase of the project, and preparation for the public involvement process. As part of the planning for the public process a volunteer committee was formed. The members responded to an advertisement he placed in the newspaper inviting anyone in the Edmonds community to contact him if they were interested in participating in this pre-planning, volunteer group. Approximately 60 people responded; this number was reduced to the Group of 33 due to the requirement that members be available for three meeting dates in July. He displayed the members of the group, noting they were all interested in the process and were representative of the community. The goal of the group was to develop design criteria that the architect could use to develop plans. Packet Page 9 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 7 At the end of the third meeting in July, ten key themes were developed: • Make Connections - linkage from the downtown core to this redeveloped area and the waterfront • Appropriate size of development - be cognizant of view corridors including Main, Dayton and James Street. The group did not want one, large mass of buildings; they wanted variety. • Support transportation choices - enhance the existing transportation system. • Capitalize unique opportunities - provide linkage and encourage use of Brackett Landing Park North and South, Senior Center, beaches, marsh, etc. The group identified a pedestrian bridge, possibly with a viewing platform, as a way to link this area to the waterfront. • Places for people/gathering places - plazas, courtyards, lawns, unique landscaping, a safe, 24/7 type development. • Parking - one idea was a parking tray underneath any development on the site to avoid surface parking. • Mixing uses of buildings - variety of different building types, sizes. Have a mix of businesses that serve a 24/7 community, uses that were lively and include events, functions, programs to draw people during the day and evening. Consider mixed use development with residential, office, retail, restaurants, pubs, coffee shops, etc. to draw people to the area. • Enrich the existing - be sensitive and respect the surrounding area. Respect Edmonds’ history and culture. Have unique amenities that compliment the existing. An aquarium, specialized museum, boutique hotel were identified as possible uses. • Design matters - encourage high quality building materials and amenities. Emphasize human scale. • Promote complementary economic development not competing economic development - plan for the long term, work with the existing elements in Edmonds including the historical downtown, arts community, Senior Center, transportation and festivals. Mr. Keuss explained these themes were then given to the architect to develop design. Phase 3 was the public involvement process and presentation of the architect’s designs to the public. In response to a frequently asked question regarding why the Port was involved in this effort, Mr. Keuss advised, 1) the Port’s mission was to promote tourism and economic development and they believed this development met that goal, 2) the Port was the largest property owner and as such had a vested interest, and 3) the Port Commission wanted to ensure there was consistency in the development plan. Recognizing that communication would be important, the Port worked hard to inform the community about the public involvement process including establishing an information room at Harbor Square with all the materials from the work group, plans, and information from the public meetings. A link to the Harbor Square Antique Mall redevelopment program that contained all the materials available at the information room was included on the Port’s website. The Beacon and Enterprise were also used to advertise meetings and to encourage the public to participate in the process. In response to criticism that this was not an open process, Mr. Keuss emphasized there were few other processes that were as open as this. Mr. Keuss advised there were four citywide public meetings. On October 4 the code compliant plan, the plan the property owners could develop under the existing code, and four alternatives, from 3-4 story buildings to 10-story buildings, were unveiled. Another meeting was held on October 18 regarding the same plans and similar discussion was held. Another public meeting was held on October 25, where the plans were narrowed to the code compliant plan, a conceptual refined plan with 4-6 story buildings with public amenities. Another public meeting was held on November 13. He advised he had now facilitated 20 public meetings - four citywide meetings, and presentations to sixteen groups and organizations including the Kiwanis, arts organizations, ACE, etc. Two more presentations will be held this month and one is scheduled in March. Packet Page 10 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 8 Mr. Keuss displayed and reviewed the code compliant plan. In this scenario Harbor Square remained as is, other than another floor could be added to the single story Building 2. He described potential development on the Skipper’s and Antique Mall sites, noting under existing code, the sites would be built out with buildings, landscaping, and surface parking. He anticipated it would be similar to Harbor Square, a business park with commercial space, possibly a restaurant, deli and/or coffee shop, but it was unlikely to include retail. He recalled retail at Harbor Square was unsuccessful because people would not come to that area for retail and it evolved into a business park. He noted in the code compliant plan there was no pedestrian bridge to the waterfront, no linkage to downtown or the waterfront, few opportunities for tourism, and little open space or public amenities. He referred to a rumor that the developers did not want to develop the area with the code complaint plan because they would not make any money, explaining the opposite was true. The developers were happy to build in accordance with the code compliant plan because it was the most profitable as few public amenities were required. Mr. Keuss displayed the conceptual refined plan, emphasizing it was a concept only and the actual plan would likely be different. The conceptual refined plan was an attempt to illustrate public amenities if heights were increased to 4-6 stories. He explained there would be 700 residential units, 85,000 square feet of office space, 135,000 square feet of retail space, and over 2 acres of public open space. He emphasized to get public amenities, there would need to be a mass of buildings. The more mass of buildings the more amenities could be provided; lower scale buildings resulted in fewer amenities. He referred to the existing 5-story building on the waterfront, the Ebbtide, as a reference for a 4-6 story building. He noted the conceptual refined plan was a mixed use development, a mix of office, retail, residential and public open space. He relayed the urban design experts’ advice that such a mix was required for such a development to be successful. With regard to next steps, he advised the public involvement phase was reaching a conclusion and the property owners have not discussed any other phases. The property owners met in early December and agreed to take a holiday hiatus and possibly conduct further financial analysis in the future but no other meetings have been scheduled. The Port Commission has scheduled a public meeting on Tuesday, February 12 to discuss master planning opportunities for the Harbor Square site. Mr. Keuss summarized this was a unique opportunity, an opportunity that presented itself once in a generation/lifetime to make an impact on the City for the next 50-75 years. He acknowledged some development would occur on this site; the private property owners have made that clear. He questioned whether the City wanted to let development occur under the existing code, losing the opportunity to obtain public amenities in the development. Mr. Keuss referred to a rumor that some people wanted the City to acquire the property for a park. He pointed out to create a park on the site, the City would need to purchase the property as well as develop and maintain the park, none of which were inexpensive. He recalled working for King County Parks during Forward Thrust in the early 1970s when a great deal of land was purchased and developed as neighborhood and regional parks and swimming pools. Because no maintenance funds were included in the levy, many sites have deteriorated due to lack of funds. He encouraged the Council to consider the importance of this site to the community. He noted the Port’s interest was Harbor Square and no redevelopment of that site was anticipated for 10-15 years. Councilmember Wambolt thanked Mr. Keuss for an outstanding presentation, finding he portrayed the facts with little opinion and dispelled much of the misinformation in the community. Observing there were still many options that could be considered with regard to parking, residential and commercial mix, options for open space, etc., Council President Plunkett asked whether the work of the group of 33 and the Port’s involvement was ending. Mr. Keuss responded the work of the group of 33 Packet Page 11 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 9 was completed at the end of July when they developed the design criteria. The group convened once in early September to provide input on the four alternatives but has not met since then. The Port Commission has asked him to step back from the process as the Port’s commitment to the community and the property owners was through the public involvement phase. He noted there was an opportunity for the City and property owners to work together on something that could be mutually beneficial. He referred to some Councilmembers’ interest in a park on the site, and suggested instead of the City purchasing, developing and maintaining a park, the City work with the property owners to include development and maintenance of a park in the project. Councilmember Orvis thanked Mr. Keuss for making the information available online and inquired about additional information including the financial analysis. Mr. Keuss advised the financial analysis on the Harbor Square site was available online; he did not have permission from the private property owners to include the financial analysis regarding the Antique Mall or Skipper’s sites. He advised the Harbor Square information could be used to approximate the other sites. Councilmember Wilson, a participant on the group of 33, felt the consultants led them to a plan that did not provide as much public benefit as he expected. And although it was a very public process, it did not serve the citizens or property owners as well as it should have and he anticipated a much better process could be conducted. He referred to a comment that there was approximately 5 acres of open space in the conceptual refined plan and asked where it was located. Mr. Keuss advised the plan contained 95,000 square feet of open space, slightly more than 2 acres. He identified the largest amount, approximately 1½ acres, in the form of an open square/plaza and esplanade on the Antique Mall site. The open space on the Harbor Square site was an east-west and north-south pedestrian esplanade. He referred to a conservatory near the marsh on the southeast corner of the Harbor Square site. Councilmember Wilson asked whether the architect considered the recent study that indicated a 4-8 foot increase in sea levels. Mr. Keuss answered that question was asked during one of the public meetings and the architect assured the plan anticipated climate concerns. Councilmember Wilson inquired whether parking was anticipated to be subterranean. Mr. Keuss explained the concept of a tray of parking under the entire site as it was felt excavation of 4-5 feet was feasible before water table issues were encountered. Councilmember Wilson inquired about the character of the feedback at the public meetings and how it would be integrated into the development. Mr. Keuss answered most of the public who attended meetings and provided comment felt something needed to happen on this site. He noted many felt the development should be low rise, code compliant; others felt there were opportunities in working with the City and developers to get public amenities as part of the development. He commented they had received comments from as far as Montana and Idaho which demonstrated the amount of interest in this project. He acknowledged the difficulty reaching a consensus on how the site should be developed. Councilmember Wilson commented this project could become a regional standard for this type of development. Mr. Keuss agreed there was an opportunity to do something special on this site, something that could become a standard for the community and the region. Councilmember Wilson clarified the Port did not plan to submit or be a party to a master plan. Mr. Keuss answered not at this time. He noted as a result of the February 12 public hearing, the Port Commissioners may provide alternate direction. Councilmember Dawson asked whether the public comments were available to the City Council. Mr. Keuss advised a nearly verbatim recap of the comments from the two citywide public meetings in October was available on the Harbor Square Antique Mall redevelopment website. He has prepared a recap of comments from all the other meetings but did not yet have the permission of the property owners to Packet Page 12 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 10 release that information. He hoped that information would be available on the website in the future. Councilmember Dawson commented it would be helpful to review the public’s comments. Councilmember Dawson referred to Mr. Keuss’ comment regarding the Port’s plans to discuss master planning for the Harbor Square site and the work that had been conducted that considered the sites in their totality, asking whether any decision to be made by the Council with regard to the privately owned properties would be separate from the Port properties. Mr. Keuss agreed, anticipating the Port would be interested in being involved in the process but any discussion at this time would be with the private property owners. Assuming there would be change with regard to the buildings on the site, Councilmember Wilson observed it would occur one of three ways, 1) under the existing code, 2) via a quasi judicial master planning process or 3) via a legislative process. He inquired how change would occur via a legislative change either to all three parcels or only two parcels. If the Council wanted to build on the momentum/enthusiasm of the past year, what would the vehicles for change be? Mr. Snyder commented if development occurred under the current zoning, applications would be submitted by the property owners. Any changes to the zoning could be initiated either by the Council or the property owners. The logical place to begin, whether City-initiated or property owner-initiated, would be with the Comprehensive Plan as any zoning change must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He concluded it was a 2-step process that could be initiated by the Council or the property owners. If initiated by the property owners, the Council could widen or narrow the scope of review. Councilmember Wilson asked how the Council would begin a Council-led initiative to update the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Snyder recommended starting with a report by the planning staff regarding docketing Comprehensive Plan amendments in the 2008 process. Councilmember Bernheim observed it would not be necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan if the vision were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Snyder agreed. Councilmember Wilson referred to the language in the Comprehensive Plan, noting it was fairly broad and referred to a master plan approach. Mr. Snyder advised the master plan was the template for a legislative approach and the Council would need to enact a master planning process. Councilmember Wilson questioned how the Council could, building on the momentum/enthusiasm of the past year, develop a process that created more consensus around what the public wanted developed on the site that was beyond the current code. Mr. Snyder suggested the logical place to begin was with a review of the existing Comprehensive Plan and ordinances by the Planning Department to advise the Council what was possible. A determination could then be made regarding the impediments, whether they were in the Comprehensive Plan or the code. 7. PRESENTATION BY MARK BUCKLIN, ATTORNEY, WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY. Mr. Bucklin explained he was making this presentation at the request of the City Attorney and the Mayor and at the behest of Washington Cities Insurance Authority, noting the presentation would likely be made to other City Councils throughout the year. Mr. Bucklin noted most City Councils offered the public the opportunity to speak at Council meetings and the Council may impose decorum and time limits; it was not a requirement that citizens be provided the opportunity to speak and some Councils did not provide it. Councils may schedule agenda items to address concerns raised by the public regarding City operations; scheduling an agenda item typically required a majority vote of the Council. Individual Councilmembers may address matters of public concern at Council meetings if the agenda provides an opportunity for Council reports and comments. Packet Page 13 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 11 He explained there were several issues to be considered when making comment in a public meeting depending on the topic. First, whether the subject matter involved current or future quasi judicial subjects that are or may come before the Council. He noted the Port’s presentation touched on this issue. In general terms if there was a matter pending before the Council, was before the Council or was on appeal and may be returned to the Council involving a quasi judicial decision where the Council was required to be judge-like and impartial dealing with specific rights regarding specific parcels and/or the property owners, the Council was required to, (1) be impartial and (2) appear fair. He noted the Appearance of Fairness Act required the Council avoid receiving facts and information outside the record or at a minimum disclose when it had occurred and for the individual Councilmember to make a determination whether they could proceed fairly and impartially or needed to recuse themselves. Before speaking with the public, he urged the Council to consider whether the subject matter involved current or potential future litigation involving the City. Another consideration before speaking with the public was whether the subject matter involved criticism or accusation of wrongdoing by a member of the public, city official or staff. For example, it was the Council’s right/obligation to speak generically about the job performance of staff such as in presenting information to the council or carrying out the will of the Council. However Councilmembers whose comments targeted individuals may be exposing themselves to potential lawsuits for libel and slander depending on what was said. As a general practice, when a Councilmember was sitting in a legislative capacity, conducting the business of the City, they had broad immunity regarding what they said but it was not absolute in all circumstances. Further, once a Councilmember stepped off the dais, their immunity rapidly eroded and they were subject to the same libel and slander rules as the public. Mr. Bucklin explained Councilmembers were free to comment on pending, future or desired legislative action. Councilmembers were almost always a legislative body but City and County Councils had the unique dual role where they sometimes acted as judges. When a topic was purely legislation or politicking; purely public opinion regarding what was in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the City; what was the best budgetary decision or the best taxation decision, a Councilmember was free to speak their mind and the public was free to speak to the Council on those topics. There may be circumstances when the Council wishes to conduct further fact-finding. He pointed out that the Council acted as a body and not as individuals; a Councilmember’s individual right was to vote and when a majority of the body voted, a decision was made. Fact-finding by the body may be by invitation; the Council may schedule a public hearing to gather public comment on certain topics. For example the Council could schedule a public hearing to gather input on how well the City’s parks were being run, whether there should be more parks, whether more money should be spent on parks, etc.; however, the Council should not schedule a public hearing regarding whether a staff member was a thief. He explained this was not the Council’s responsibility, the Council did not have subpoena power, the Council could not put people under oath therefore they were free to lie and there were better agencies to conduct that investigation. He acknowledged individual Councilmembers would be “buttonholed” by the public at times. He cautioned the Council to consider why the person was talking with them; if the comments were of a general nature or addressed a desire for legislative changes in the future, there was no issue. However if the comments were in regard to a specific wrongdoing, he urged the Council to be cautious about taking a position before knowing all the facts. If a Councilmember was persuaded there was some merit to the allegation, he suggested they first encourage the person to take the matter to the source such as contacting the appropriate Department Head or the Mayor who could investigate the matter. If the allegation were regarding criminal wrongdoing, he suggested the person be encouraged to contact the appropriate law enforcement agency. In circumstances where a person was unable/afraid to contact the appropriate party, he suggested the Councilmember contact the appropriate Department Head, Mayor or law enforcement agency and request a review of the person’s concerns. He did not encourage Councilmembers to conduct Packet Page 14 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 12 their own investigation. Mr. Bucklin summarized stating that one of WCIA’s goals was to keep costs down via risk management. Council President Plunkett observed there were circumstances where the City Attorney or Mr. Bucklin could serve as counsel to Councilmembers. He asked what a Councilmember could do that would require hiring their own attorney. Mr. Bucklin answered WCIA would try to be available to a Councilmember as much as possible although he did not determine coverage. He acknowledged there were limits to the coverage and limits on where immunity applied to Council activities. Like every insurance policy, there were clauses stating WCIA did not cover intentional wrongful acts. If a Councilmember intentionally caused harm, they were at risk. If a Councilmember’s action took place off the dais, the level of immunity began to evaporate. If a Councilmember engaged in intentionally harmful conduct, they could be personally liable. For example, he had been involved in situations where Councilmembers were alleged to have been harassing employees, walking through the workplace making disparaging remarks and threatening to have their jobs eliminated. He noted this act may create a hostile work environment and a Councilmember may not be covered. Councilmember Orvis encouraged Councilmembers to read a Spokane case, where the judge told the Council their actions were outside the scope of their authority. Mr. Snyder referred to Mr. Bucklin’s example regarding issues outside the scope of the Council’s job, noting the hiring and firing of city employees was the Mayor’s responsibility not the Council’s. He noted in addition to WCIA coverage, the Council and City employees were protected by an indemnification ordinance that had exclusions for dishonest, fraudulent, criminal and willful and intentional acts, acts that were not performed on behalf of the City and lawsuits brought against an official or employee on behalf of the City. He noted in Shoreline where Councilmembers had been sued for open meeting violations; the city would go through a process to determine whether it should proceed with a defense under a reservation of rights pending the determination of the facts. Mr. Bucklin commented for a long time it was the judicially held public opinion that the use of public funds to pay for the intentional wrongful conduct of public employees or elected officials was a misuse of public funds. However, the State legislature passed a law approximately ten years ago that allowed individual municipal bodies to make a legislative determination on a case-by-case basis whether they would provide a defense for allegations of intentional misconduct and/or pay judgments. Councilmember Wambolt observed Mr. Bucklin cautioned the Council from fact finding outside of public hearings. Mr. Bucklin clarified his caution was not fact finding on matters that were legitimate for the Council as a body but fact finding into allegations of wrongdoing and criminal conduct. 8A. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Karen Wiggins, Edmonds, agreed what the Harbor Square/Antique Mall group presented was very beautiful but was not appropriate for that area. She and others did not support building a wall on the waterfront or the “Kirklandization” of Edmonds. She anticipated code compliant development could occur that was very beautiful, referring to development at Mill Creek Town Center, Alderwood Mall, and University Village as examples. She acknowledged the need for economic development, pointing out the proposal of up to 10 stories could be built at Westgate, Five Corners or in other commercial areas. She anticipated code compliant development could be done profitably under the existing code as she and her husband had done on two properties. She urged the City to consider a code compliant development of the waterfront site, possibly with some park area funded via grants. Jim Hills, President, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, commented the redevelopment of Harbor Square/Antique Mall sites could have a major impact on the city for decades as the properties Packet Page 15 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 13 were adjacent to focal points that provided much of the city’s identity and popularity. That potential was recognized by the Port, who along with private land owners and the City embarked on an inclusive process to help shape a future project. That process included multiple meetings, a diverse panel of 33 community members, and although not required by City Code, the process was a unique and well intentioned effort to elicit public input before the project was built. The Chamber acknowledged the importance of the Harbor Square/Antique Mall properties to Edmonds residents and the City’s long term economic development and supports the outreach efforts undertaken this summer and the values that evolved from those efforts. The Chamber supports the following concepts that could be applied to any project on those sites: promote complimentary not competing economic development, make connections linking the downtown core and the waterfront, look at unique opportunities for small businesses, mix building uses to accommodate a variety of users, provide places for people, support transportation choices, enrich the existing environment with sensitivity to the surrounding areas, and the appropriate size of development in relation to views. He summarized via attention to these core values, a variety of potential projects could address a spectrum of issues including economic development, development of open space and views. The Chamber was confident the Council would proceed in a thoughtful and deliberative manner as it discussed the needs of the City, the business community and residents. Spencer Cross, American System Economist, LaRouche Political Action Committee, referred to their legislation, the Homeowners and Bank Protection act of 2007, and urged the Council to consider supporting it as a Council as well as individually. He pointed out the mortgage aspect of the banking crisis had accelerated to a point beyond the level of the Great Depression and the sub-prime aspects were just beginning to hit the United States. He noted it was not only a housing crisis but an international banking crisis. He summarized their legislation was not a bail out. Stephen Andrew, American System Political Economist, LaRouche Political Action Committee, commented on the collapse of the worldwide financial system. In talking to the public every day, he noted the public was scared. He relayed a statistic provided at an affordable housing commission meeting in Olympia yesterday that 40% of the population of King County could not afford their mortgages. Joan Bloom, Edmonds, referred to Mr. Keuss’ comments about the public process and gathering input, commenting the process was pointless if there was no mechanism to gather and summarize the input for the Council and citizens and to move the process forward. She found Mr. Keuss’ response to Councilmember Wilson’s question about the character of the feedback to be very vague. With regard to the availability of the public’s comments online, she found it very tedious to review the comments and there was no overview provided of the process. As a member of the group of 33, she felt their work was misunderstood and misrepresented. She stressed the group made no decisions and no recommendations; they were part of a process. She supported integrating the input in a manner that moved the process forward to a decision with regard to developing the waterfront project. She considered suggesting the Council interview the members of the group of 33 about their experience. She summarized the input was not gathered or integrated in a manner that moved the process forward. Darrell Marmion, Edmonds, referred to the property in the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center, the proper name for the Harbor Square/Antique Mall area, stating he looked forward to the public process on development in that area. He felt the process had not ended, it had only just begun with the property owners gathering input from some members of the public and a presentation by one of the property owners, the Port. He was not part of the group of 33 because he was unable to commit to the three specific dates in July. He did participate in the 2030 blog, but after submitting a few comments, he felt although a well intended effort, it was a representation of the property owners. He ultimately did not want to be a member of the group of 33 because he did not want his input to enhance the efforts of the developers and to be mistakenly identified as someone who enforced the developers’ plan. Packet Page 16 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 14 Al Rutledge, Edmonds, advised of a meeting on January 25 at the Edmonds School District offices with the City Parks & Recreation regarding the old Edmonds-Woodway High School fields. Next, he thanked Councilmember Wilson for recommending the Council discuss Lake Ballinger at the Council retreat. He reported the Stevens Hospital Board meets the third or fourth Wednesday of each month and the public was welcome to attend. He then commented on the City of Shoreline and Woodway’s interest in annexing the Pt. Wells property due to development proposed on that site. He suggested Edmonds be involved in that process as they provided police protection to Woodway. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented after listening to a number of Mr. Keuss’ presentations, he developed an outlook with regard to people’s opinions. He stated people felt something needed to happen on the site although there was disagreement regarding exactly what should happen. After Mr. Keuss’ presentations, the question always arose why the City wanted 700 condominiums and the associated traffic. Mr. Hertrich pointed out the Port’s mission was economic development and tourism; he felt Mr. Keuss’ presentation addressed economic development but not tourism. He urged the Council to become involved to ensure consideration was given to development that would enhance tourism. He disagreed with Councilmember Wambolt’s comment that the public had been misinformed, stating the public had a very good idea of the development the property owners wanted. He appreciated the property owners’ efforts as it allowed the public to form stronger opinions about what they wanted in that area. He summarized this was likely the most important development that would ever happen in Edmonds and needed to be done properly. Next, he asked when the Planning Board alternate position would be advertised. Mayor Haakenson asked Mr. Hertrich what he wanted to see developed on the Harbor Square/Antique Mall site. Mr. Hertrich answered a low level type development, possibly some sort of mixed use with an emphasis on uses that would draw tourists to Edmonds. He suggested hiring a consultant to determine uses that would provide economic stimulus. Council President Plunkett advised the Council would discuss the waterfront development at the retreat. Ray Martin, Edmonds, commented on last week’s Council meeting, noting the Council had ratcheted up the level of civility and the respect the Council received from the public. He noted tonight provided a good lesson on the American political system’s checks and balances with the Council correcting the Mayor when he stepped into the Council’s area of responsibility. Next he referred to development surrounding the Space Needle, recalling in his youth that area was dilapidated but was now a wonderful place. He commented if the Space Needle were located on the Harbor Square/Antique Mall site, the view from the top would be only rooftops; there needed to be more open space. He acknowledged the entire site could not be converted to a park but an aquarium may be an appropriate use. He suggested the City discuss how to develop this area with Seattle. He summarized Edmonds had a unique opportunity to create something that would make everyone happy. Councilmember Wambolt clarified the Edmonds 2030 website was not sponsored by all the property owners; it was sponsored by the owner of the Antique Mall site and was done independent of the other property owners. 8B. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE STEWARDSHIP OF LAKE BALLINGER AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LAKE BALLINGER BASIN ACTION PLAN COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1164. Councilmember Wilson explained he spoke with a number of Lake Ballinger area residents who educated him regarding water quality and water quantity issues. Since November he had the opportunity to work with Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene including meeting with Mountlake Terrace staff. He also met Packet Page 17 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 15 with members of the State and Federal delegation and corresponded with Councilmembers in Shoreline and Lynnwood. This resolution was proposed as the State delegation felt there was an opportunity to obtain funds to support cleanup of Lake Ballinger. State Representatives Marko Liias and Mark Ericks were working on appropriations this legislative session for cleaning up Lake Ballinger and to address flooding. He noted this effort includes Edmonds, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Lake Forest Park, Shoreline, Department of Ecology, Department of Transportation, and Snohomish County and was an inter-jurisdictional problem that could not be addressed by one municipality or jurisdiction. He noted there was an opportunity for funding from the State and possibly the federal government, funds that would require matching funds from local jurisdictions. Councilmember Wilson summarized the purpose of the resolution was to identify the stewardship of Lake Ballinger to be among the City’s highest environmental priorities and direct staff to continue to work collaboratively on the development of a Lake Ballinger Basin action plan. Councilmember Dawson commented the resolution was consistent with Council policy and this and past Councils have been supportive of efforts to maintain and enhance the water quality of Lake Ballinger. Councilmember Olson agreed the resolution was an excellent idea. She questioned the percentages cited in the resolution, recalling Mr. Fiene indicated they were incorrect. She also noted Councilmember Wilson had included Lake Forest Park as one of the parties but that was not reflected in the resolution. Councilmember Wilson advised he would accept whatever percentages staff provided; the numbers cited were taken from a fact sheet produced by Mountlake Terrace. He advised Lake Forest Park asked to be included in the resolution as they wanted to be part of the effort. He suggested adding Lake Forest Park to the resolution. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The resolution approved reads as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 1164 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REGARDING THE STEWARDSHIP OF LAKE BALLINGER AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A “LAKE BALLINGER BASIN ACTION PLAN” Mayor Haakenson requested Mr. Fiene incorporate the suggested changes in the resolution. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS ON COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS. Councilmember Wambolt reported at their January 14 meeting, the Port Commission selected Fred Gouge as the 2008 Commission President. The Commission also discussed the Jacobson Marine building, a 13,000 square foot building to be constructed on the Port property. Due to difficulties they encountered permitting their building and the cost of the building, it was now proposed to be a 1-story building without the second story they had planned to lease. He advised Jacobson Marine was in the process of negotiating their lease with the Port and another meeting was held last week to continue negotiations. The Port Commission approved their 2008 capital budget of $516,000 and scheduled a workshop on February 12 at 10:00 a.m. to begin work on a Harbor Square Master Plan. Councilmember Orvis reported at the WRIA 8 meeting, they discussed two issues, first the Watershed’s relationship with Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). He noted this was important because funds directed through WRIA 8 via Puget Sound Regional Council could be used in Edmonds. He noted most of WRIA 8’s funding was from the Salmon Recovery Funding Board which focused on river projects and from the King County Conservation District that must be used on projects in King County. WRIA 8 staff was directed to apply for a grant whereby they could obtain funds to review building codes in the region to promote low impact development. He noted if WRIA 8 obtained the grant, Edmonds could obtain some consulting to assist in developing watershed-friendly building codes. In March the committee planned to take a field trip; the public was welcome to attend. Packet Page 18 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 16 Councilmember Olson reported Snohomish County Tomorrow and South Snohomish Cities will meet later this month. She next reported that last year the Seashore Forum had a representative from the Seattle City Council but not the Mayor’s office; this year it had a representative from the Mayor’s office but the Seattle City Council had decided not to participate due to an agreement regarding who voted on issues and funding sources. The group developed a letter to the State legislature urging them, when considering tolls, to work with local communities on impacts and to consider providing mitigation. She noted a toll on 520 would have traffic impacts on northend cities such as Bothell. Councilmember Wilson advised the Edmonds Crossing committee had not met but he met informally with Community Services Director Stephen Clifton and Administrative Services Director Dan Clements to discuss a strategy to secure funds for the City’s transportation initiatives. He noted there was tremendous opportunity for funding in Washington DC because Senator Murray was the chair of the Senate Transportation Committee. He encouraged staff, the Mayor and Councilmembers to contact the delegation to ensure they were aware of the City’s needs. He was in Olympia yesterday to speak to the resolution the Council passed last week in support of a UW campus in Snohomish County. Councilmember Dawson reported SnoCom would be electing officers at their meeting on Thursday. She reported a meeting of the joint committee consisting of the Chairs and Vice Chairs of SnoCom and SnoPac met to discuss plans to purchase a new Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system for both agencies within the next 5-7 years. She was hopeful the two agencies could coordinate their purchase due to the positive safety impacts as well as potential cost savings for both agencies. The meeting included discussion regarding hiring a consultant to develop a needs assessment of the public safety agencies in Snohomish County using funding from E-911. Councilmember Dawson reported there had been a change on the Community Transit Board due to population increases. Previously the two largest cities, Edmonds and Lynnwood, had seats on the Board, three seats for medium size cities and two seats for smaller cities. Due to population increases, there were now three cities in Snohomish County defined as large cities - Edmonds, Lynnwood and Marysville. There was discussion at the meeting to change the bylaws so that each of the large cities could continue to have a seat on the Board which was not well received by the medium and small cities. State law requires nine board members with two from the County Council and seven from cities. No change was made to the bylaws, leaving the three large cities vying for two seats. A decision was ultimately made that she remain on the Board representing Edmonds along with Marysville Mayor Kendall; Ted Hikel and Lisa Utter, Lynnwood Councilmembers, were appointed as the two alternates but Lynnwood would not have a seat on the Board. Councilmember Dawson advised former Councilmember Marin served on the Community Transit Board as well as on the Sound Transit Board. The Sound Transit Board consists of the Snohomish County Executive, a representative from Everett and a representative of the Community Transit Board who must be a south county city member. Snohomish County Executive Reardon has indicated his intent to appoint her to the seat vacated by former Councilmember Marin. Her appointment was awaiting confirmation by the Snohomish County Council. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson advised the Council would not be meeting next Tuesday as they did not meet on the fifth Tuesday of the month. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Plunkett expressed his thanks to the representatives of the LaRouche Political Action Committee for speaking to the Council, and was pleased when young people expressed their opinion to the Council. Packet Page 19 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 17 Council President Plunkett thanked Councilmember Wambolt for his efforts with regard to the waterfront development including keeping the Council informed. He advised the Council retreat would be held on February 1 and 2 at the Clearwater Resort in Suquamish which could be reached by taking the Kingston ferry and driving for approximately 15 minutes. Councilmember Wambolt referred to an article in the Seattle PI regarding HB 2977 and SB 6577, bills that would make it easier for property owners to appeal their property assessment. He noted on the surface this may sound good; however, as the article indicated, the primary benefactors were likely to be commercial property owners because they had the resources to retain experts to assist in lowering their assessment. Homeowners may have to make up the resulting revenue shortfall created by the reduction in the value of commercial properties. Councilmember Olson advised several Councilmembers were attending the Association of Washington Cities annual conference in Olympia on January 30 and 31. Councilmember Wilson commented the process with regard to the waterfront property was in the middle stages and it was incumbent on the Council to drive the process forward. He looked forward to discussing it at the retreat. He noted although several cities that had reinvented their downtown including Seattle, Spokane, Baltimore, etc., there were few examples of a city like Edmonds - a suburban city with a waterfront, rail, ferry and other amenities. He pointed out the City had a great responsibility because if done right, the development could be a standard for other areas. He referred to Mr. Snyder’s suggestion that the Council begin with a review of the existing Comprehensive Plan and ordinances regarding what was possible. Mayor Haakenson suggested that be provided at the retreat. Councilmember Wilson requested it also be reviewed at a Council meeting. Councilmember Bernheim referred to the concept of purchasing the Antique Mall property for a park with no productive value as a straw-man proposal, noting the public wanted alternatives including public uses to be considered. He noted those alternative uses had yet to be determined because the resources available to the public were minuscule compared to the resources expended by the property owners, the Port and the City to promote the concept developed to-date. He recalled the amount paid to the consultant was approximately $180,000. He anticipated different ideas could be developed by paying a consultant $10,000 to $15,000. He had several ideas for the Antique Mall property that he offered to share at the Council retreat. He found it unfair to judge the proponents of these alternatives by the standards of the professional consultants. He cited as an example the old shopping center being transformed by PCC that would not only be a beacon for Edmonds shoppers but be on magazine covers worldwide. He looked forward to involving the people who opposed the alternatives proposed to date in a cooperative process and if necessary financing development of other ideas. Councilmember Dawson commented the discussion regarding what might be a tourist draw reminded her of the process the PFD went through before settling on a performing arts center. She suggested reviewing that information and that process. She pointed out considerably more than $10,000 to $15,000 would be required for a serious master planning process, thus the importance of reaching some consensus on whether there would be a public component to the process before investing public resources. Councilmember Dawson relayed Mr. Snyder’s recommendation to notice the AWC conference and dinner as a public meeting as Councilmembers Bernheim, Wilson and Councilmember Olson and she planned to attend. Student Representative Scheibert reported last week Edmonds-Woodway High School discontinued the use of styrofoam lunch trays, eliminating a considerable amount of garbage. She encouraged other Packet Page 20 of 415 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 22, 2008 Page 18 schools to take the issue up with the school administration, noting they had encountered little resistance and it was an easy way for schools to stay environmentally conscious and aware. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Packet Page 21 of 415 AM-1390 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Debbie Karber Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #101779 through #101927 in the amount of $1,493,618.80 for January 24, 2008, and approval of #101928 through #102061 in the amount of $197,575.82 for January 31, 2008. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2008 Revenue: Expenditure: $1,691,194.62 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $1,691,194.62 Attachments Link: Claim cks 1-24-08 Link: Claim cks 1-31-08 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 01/31/2008 10:52 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 10:55 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/31/2008 10:59 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 11:02 AM APRV Packet Page 22 of 415 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 11:02 AM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 01/31/2008 10:34 AM Final Approval Date: 01/31/2008 Packet Page 23 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101779 1/24/2008 070941 AAF INTERNATIONAL 773181 FAC MAINT - PERFECT PLEAT HC FILTERS FAC MAINT - PERFECT PLEAT HC FILTERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 524.94 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 46.72 Total :571.66 101780 1/24/2008 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 249732 RODENT CONTROL CITY WIDE RODENT CONTROL 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 92.56 Total :92.56 101781 1/24/2008 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 250985 1-13992 PEST CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 57.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 5.12 Total :62.62 101782 1/24/2008 068201 ACTIVE NETWORK LTD INC007159 MAINTENANCE FEES CLASS SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FEES~ 001.000.640.574.200.480.00 9,724.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.480.00 865.44 Total :10,589.44 101783 1/24/2008 062423 ADPRO LITHO INC 70622 City Newsletter - January 2008 City Newsletter - January 2008 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 3,153.00 Sales Tax 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 280.62 Total :3,433.62 101784 1/24/2008 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 3-0197-0800478 FS 20 - GARBAGE DEC 07 1Page: Packet Page 24 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101784 1/24/2008 (Continued)061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES FS 20 - GARBAGE DEC 07 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 85.34 PW GARBAGE DEC 073-0197-0800897 PW GARBAGE DEC 07 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.97 PW GARBAGE DEC 07 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 79.67 PW GARBAGE DEC 07 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 79.67 PW GARBAGE DEC 07 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 79.67 PW GARBAGE DEC 07 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 79.67 PW GARBAGE DEC 07 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 79.65 FS 16 GARBAGE DEC 073-0197-0801132 FS 16 GARBAGE DEC 07 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 102.53 MCH GARBAGE DEC 073-0197-0829729 MCH GARBAGE DEC 07 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 53.61 Total :660.78 101785 1/24/2008 065568 ALLWATER INC 011008009 COEWASTE DRINKING WATER 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 21.85 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 0.62 Total :22.47 101786 1/24/2008 068857 AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL INC 918336 FAC ASBESTOS - PROF SVC RENDERED FAC ASBESTOS - PROF SVC RENDERED 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 3,095.00 Total :3,095.00 2Page: Packet Page 25 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101787 1/24/2008 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 138087-071202 APA membership Clugston 4/08 to 3/31/09 APA membership Clugston 4/08 to 3/31/09 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 220.00 Total :220.00 101788 1/24/2008 001429 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 2008 Dues APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 001.000.620.532.200.490.00 120.00 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 001.000.620.558.800.490.00 120.00 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 120.00 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 120.00 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 111.000.653.542.900.490.00 120.00 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 60.00 APWA Annual Dues thru 03/31/09 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 60.00 Total :720.00 101789 1/24/2008 069751 ARAMARK 512-4065176 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.36 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.70 UNIFORM SERVICES512-4071436 PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.36 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.70 Total :66.12 101790 1/24/2008 069751 ARAMARK 512-4065178 18386001 3Page: Packet Page 26 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101790 1/24/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.31 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.46 Total :100.77 101791 1/24/2008 069751 ARAMARK 512-4057386 FLEET UNIFORM SVC FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 19.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.74 4Page: Packet Page 27 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101791 1/24/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS512-4057387 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC512-4057388 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 5Page: Packet Page 28 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101791 1/24/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-4059082 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.60 FLEET UNIFORM SVC512-4063546 FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 19.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.74 6Page: Packet Page 29 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101791 1/24/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS512-4063547 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-4065177 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.60 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44 7Page: Packet Page 30 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101791 1/24/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK FLEET UNIFORM SVC512-4069687 FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 22.58 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 2.01 PW MATS512-4069688 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 8Page: Packet Page 31 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101791 1/24/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-4071437 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.60 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44 Total :296.43 101792 1/24/2008 068379 ARCHITECREATION INC UA-07-0775B DOWNTOWN STREET TREES TREE GRATES AND FRAMES FOR DOWNTOWN 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 2,380.00 Freight 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 300.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 238.52 Total :2,918.52 101793 1/24/2008 018277 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS INC F08-00568I INV#F08-00568I EDMONDS PD GRAY 6-INCH RULERS (10 PACK) 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 39.75 ADHESIVE GRAY SCALES (50 PACK) 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 12.50 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 10.99 Total :63.24 101794 1/24/2008 001441 ASCAP 100002562548 2008 LICENSE FEE 2008 LICENSE FEES 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 294.00 Total :294.00 101795 1/24/2008 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 567996 PS GENERATOR - DIESEL PS GENERATOR - DIESEL 001.000.651.519.920.320.00 173.18 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.320.00 13.85 9Page: Packet Page 32 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101795 1/24/2008 (Continued)071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM CLEAR ULS DIESEL - 3120 GAL568157 CLEAR ULS DIESEL - 3120 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 8,314.18 ST EXCISE TAX, WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1,192.46 BIO DIESEL - 780 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 2,768.45 ST EXCISE TAX, WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 302.80 VALVTECT BIO BLEND ANTI DEICER - 666 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 234.43 UNLEADED REG GAS - 1600 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 3,973.76 ST EXCISE TAX, WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 609.92 WA STATE SERVICE FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 40.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 18.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 3.20 10Page: Packet Page 33 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101795 1/24/2008 (Continued)071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM CLEAR ULS DIESEL - 501 GAL568388 CLEAR ULS DIESEL - 501 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1,228.65 ST EXCISE TAX, WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 190.48 PLUS UNLEADED - 8800 GAL 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 21,614.56 ST EXCISE TAX, WA OIL SPILL RECOVERY 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 3,345.76 WA STATE SERVICE FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 20.00 WA STATE SERVICE FEE 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 20.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 1.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1.60 Total :44,067.63 101796 1/24/2008 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 68763 BADGES BADGES 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 17.50 Freight 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 1.78 Total :21.78 101797 1/24/2008 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST February 2008 FEBRUARY 2008 AWC PREMIUMS 11Page: Packet Page 34 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101797 1/24/2008 (Continued)001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST 02/08 Fire Pension AWC Premiums 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 4,739.50 02/08 Retirees AWC Premiums 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 25,539.90 02/08 Gaydos AWC Premiums 001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,107.13 02/08 AWC Premiums 811.000.000.231.510.000.00 289,082.85 Total :320,469.38 101798 1/24/2008 067571 AWWA-KING CO SUBSECTION 3911 (2) "WATER USE EFFICIENCY RULE GUIDANCE (2) "WATER USE EFFICIENCY RULE GUIDANCE 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 150.00 Total :150.00 101799 1/24/2008 064934 BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PS 07-12-5 E7MA.Services thru 12/31/07 E7MA.Services thru 12/31/07 132.000.640.594.760.650.00 1,050.00 Total :1,050.00 101800 1/24/2008 002100 BARNARD, EARL 11 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 389.00 Total :389.00 101801 1/24/2008 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 644125 INV#644125 EDMONDS PD - LAWLESS SERVICE BARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.55 STARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 10.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.29 12Page: Packet Page 35 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101801 1/24/2008 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC INV#644589 EDMONDS PD - FALK644589 BDU PANTS FOR ALERT 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 75.90 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 6.76 INV#644809 EDMONDS PD - GREENMUN644809 ATAC LOW 6" BOOTS 001.000.410.521.310.240.00 75.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.310.240.00 6.68 Total :180.18 101802 1/24/2008 070009 BOLA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 4 EDMONDS MUSEUM MASONRY RESTORATION - EDMONDS MUSEUM MASONRY RESTORATION - 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 731.94 Total :731.94 101803 1/24/2008 060141 BRANOM INSTRUMENT 355375 3083 FREIGHT 411.000.656.538.800.480.22 6.67 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.22 0.59 3083366392 SERVICE OG HYRORANGER 411.000.656.538.800.480.22 500.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.22 44.50 Total :551.76 101804 1/24/2008 068152 CADDY, OWEN T 01232008 INTERPRETIVE DISPLAY PANELS SECOND PHASE:~ 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 2,000.00 Total :2,000.00 101805 1/24/2008 069458 CASCADE CONTROLS CORP.0143518-00 242560 13Page: Packet Page 36 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101805 1/24/2008 (Continued)069458 CASCADE CONTROLS CORP. ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 77.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 9.58 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 7.74 Total :94.72 101806 1/24/2008 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT8893 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #8893 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 137.90 Total :137.90 101807 1/24/2008 064312 CHUBB SECURITY SERVICES AH5193 monitoring for museum~ monitoring for museum~ 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 171.00 Total :171.00 101808 1/24/2008 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460811063 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 23.16 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 2.06 OPS UNIFORMS460811064 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 129.93 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.57 14Page: Packet Page 37 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101808 1/24/2008 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORMS460812110 Stn. 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.80 Stn. 17 - OPS 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.80 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.62 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.61 OPS UNIFORMS460812134 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 140.43 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.50 Total :530.48 101809 1/24/2008 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 10419530 COPIER LEASE PW copier lease for PW - JAN 08 001.000.650.519.910.450.00 538.36 Total :538.36 101810 1/24/2008 069947 CITRIX ONLINE 90651611 CUSTOMER #605063 GoToMyPC Service for 10 Users - 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 1,819.20 GoToMyPC Service for 12 Users - 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 2,183.04 Total :4,002.24 101811 1/24/2008 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5848 LYNNDALE SKATE PARK EDMONDS CONTRIBUTION FOR LYNNDALE SKATE 001.000.640.576.800.510.00 5,000.00 Total :5,000.00 101812 1/24/2008 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 5834 M&O SANITARY SEWAGE JAN 08 15Page: Packet Page 38 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101812 1/24/2008 (Continued)019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD M&O SANITARY SEWAGE JAN 08 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83 Total :13,800.83 101813 1/24/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1877908 SUPPPLIES PAPER TOWELS, LINERS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 617.37 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 54.95 Total :672.32 101814 1/24/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1879089 005302 PAPER TOWELS/LINERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 142.70 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 2.75 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 12.95 005302W1879089-1 SOAP 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 81.76 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 7.28 Total :247.44 101815 1/24/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1877012 LIBRARY - EXTRACTOR REPAIRS LIBRARY - EXTRACTOR REPAIRS 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 37.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 3.34 16Page: Packet Page 39 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101815 1/24/2008 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES FAC MAINT - SEAT COVERS, HAND SOAPW1878643 FAC MAINT - SEAT COVERS, HAND SOAP 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 231.60 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.75 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.86 FAC MAINT - TOWELS, GLOVESW1880379 FAC MAINT - TOWELS, GLOVES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 288.00 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.75 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.88 Total :612.73 101816 1/24/2008 068077 CODES KNOWLEDGE COMPANY 489 Prof Serv Struc Plan Review for Bldg Prof Serv Struc Plan Review for Bldg 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,620.00 Prof Serv Structural Plan Review for490 Prof Serv Structural Plan Review for 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 3,420.00 Total :5,040.00 101817 1/24/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 2425 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS 17Page: Packet Page 40 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101817 1/24/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS NAPKINS, CUPS 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 26.95 THE ART OF PLACEMAKING 117.100.640.573.100.490.00 52.00 CHRISTMAS LIGHTS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.27 GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.550.310.00 52.03 CELL PHONE MINUTES/DISCOVERY PROGRAM 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 27.23 RUBBER FLOORING 001.000.640.575.540.310.00 33.50 SEEDS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 191.40 CALENDAR 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 10.54 SEEDS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.85 Total :420.77 101818 1/24/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 9757 WIRE WIRE 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1,105.00 SWITCH 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 59.79 Total :1,164.79 101819 1/24/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 7577 UNIT 5 - ROBINSON CHEV - CONVE UNIT 5 - ROBINSON CHEV - CONVE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 804.09 Total :804.09 101820 1/24/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 5817 Bowman - Lithium Ion Battery 18Page: Packet Page 41 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101820 1/24/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Bowman - Lithium Ion Battery 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 115.95 Reg Fee Bullis/Graf WSU Emergency Prep 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 450.00 Total :565.95 101821 1/24/2008 062891 COOK PAGING WA 6975730 WATER PAGER WATER PAGER 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 4.46 pagers-streets 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 7.90 pagers-storm 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 15.80 pagers-facilities 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 23.70 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.03 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 0.59 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 1.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 0.67 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 1.11 Total :56.26 101822 1/24/2008 005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE LCRETIN0119 GYM MONITOR ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR~ 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 36.00 Total :36.00 101823 1/24/2008 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0108 2989771 5374044 INV#0108 2989771 5374044 EDMONDS PD 19Page: Packet Page 42 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101823 1/24/2008 (Continued)066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 5 GALLON BOTTLES OF WATER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 55.92 HOT/COLD DISPENSER RENTAL 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00 ENERGY SURCHARGE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.09 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.89 Total :68.90 101824 1/24/2008 072097 CUMMINGS, REYHAN ADOPTION 6935 SPAY/NEUTER REFUND ADOPTION 6935 SPAY/NEUTER REFUND #6935 001.000.000.343.930.000.00 50.00 Total :50.00 101825 1/24/2008 060914 CUMMINS NORTHWEST LLC 001-19504 LIFT ST G-07 - RELAY - START SOLENOID LIFT ST G-07 - RELAY - START SOLENOID 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.57 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.79 LIFT STATION G-07 - ENGINE MONITOR001-19974 LIFT STATION G-07 - ENGINE MONITOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 772.61 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 70.79 Total :900.26 101826 1/24/2008 072096 DAHL, BERGITTE 2-27250 UB REF #3-4003-MM DAHL/KROEGER RE: #3-4003-MM Utility Refund 411.000.000.233.000.000.00 97.86 20Page: Packet Page 43 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :97.861018261/24/2008 072096 072096 DAHL, BERGITTE 101827 1/24/2008 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 88550 FAC - ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT~ FAC - ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT~ 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 109.40 LIBRARY ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 109.40 MUSEUM ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 109.40 CITY HALL ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT88564 CITY HALL ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 109.40 PW ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT 3/08-3/0988769 PW ELEVATOR OPERATING PERMIT 3/08-3/09 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 109.40 Total :547.00 101828 1/24/2008 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2454 DERREK AMBURGEY OPERATOR CERTF./AMBURGEY 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 30.00 Total :30.00 101829 1/24/2008 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 08-2831 MINUTE TAKING 1/15/08 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 186.00 Total :186.00 101830 1/24/2008 068395 DUO-SAFETY LADDER CORP 385065 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS 14' & 16' ladders 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 659.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.359.00 24.36 Total :683.36 101831 1/24/2008 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2008004 Prof Serv - Bld Div Prof Serv - Bld Div 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 19,438.39 21Page: Packet Page 44 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :19,438.391018311/24/2008 069605 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 101832 1/24/2008 068357 EARTH TECH 92358-1-434007 E5FG.Services thru 12/28/07 E5FG.Services thru 12/28/07 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 4,781.81 Total :4,781.81 101833 1/24/2008 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 89741 SUPPLIES OIL FILTER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.30 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.18 Total :14.48 101834 1/24/2008 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 90135 UNIT 5 -SUPPLIES UNIT 5 -SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.35 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.19 FAC MAINT STOCK SUPPLY - VINYL90321 FAC MAINT STOCK SUPPLY - VINYL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.32 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.21 Total :17.07 101835 1/24/2008 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 13114 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES/ONYX VALVE ANALYTICAL RESOURCES/ONYX VALVE 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 126.96 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 11.30 UPS WHITNEY/ONYX VALVE13157 UPS WHITNEY/ONYX VALVE 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 47.04 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 4.19 22Page: Packet Page 45 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :189.491018351/24/2008 070683 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 101836 1/24/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00200 CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 186.58 MINI PARK6-00475 MINI PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 410.35 CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 597.10 WATER6-04425 8100 185TH PL SW 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 255.85 YOST PARK POOL6-08525 YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 133.38 Total :1,583.26 101837 1/24/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-01130 WWTP WATER WWTP WATER 411.000.656.538.800.473.64 22.89 WWTP WATER6-01140 WWTP WATER 411.000.656.538.800.473.64 583.27 Total :606.16 101838 1/24/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,049.77 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE6-02736 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 13.08 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE6-02737 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 191.44 23Page: Packet Page 46 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101838 1/24/2008 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION LIBRARY & SPRINKLER6-02825 LIBRARY & SPRINKLER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 813.26 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR)6-02875 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR) 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 22.89 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER6-02925 ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 991.36 Fire Station #166-04127 Fire Station #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 459.98 fire sprinkler-FS #166-04128 fire sprinkler-FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 13.08 Public Works Bldg6-05155 Public Works Bldg 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 94.50 Public Works Bldg 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 359.09 Public Works Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 359.09 Public Works Bldg 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 359.09 Public Works Bldg 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 359.09 Public Works Bldg 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 359.06 24Page: Packet Page 47 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101838 1/24/2008 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Public Works Fire Detector6-05156 Public Works Fire Detector 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 1.63 Public Works Fire Detector 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 6.21 Public Works Fire Detector 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 6.19 Total :5,477.44 101839 1/24/2008 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 030802 Canon 5870 Copier Maint. - 12/7/07 - Canon 5870 Copier Maint. - 12/7/07 - 001.000.610.519.700.480.00 29.11 Canon 5870 Copier Maint. - 12/7/07 - 001.000.220.516.100.480.00 29.10 Canon 5870 Copier Maint. - 12/7/07 - 001.000.210.513.100.480.00 29.09 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.480.00 2.59 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.480.00 2.59 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.480.00 2.59 Total :95.07 101840 1/24/2008 064013 EMERGENCY SERVICES 848-48-008-002 2008 ESCA Member Assessment Fee 2008 ESCA Member Assessment Fee 001.000.390.525.600.510.00 62,323.00 2008 ESCA Designated Diaster 001.000.390.525.600.510.00 26,246.00 25Page: Packet Page 48 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :88,569.001018401/24/2008 064013 064013 EMERGENCY SERVICES 101841 1/24/2008 067232 GERRISH BEARING COMPANY 2076544-01 BEARING BEARING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 49.41 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.21 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.95 Total :60.57 101842 1/24/2008 012199 GRAINGER 9539762360 837944131 FLOAT SWITCH 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 751.94 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 62.41 Total :814.35 101843 1/24/2008 012199 GRAINGER 9531299288 WATER - MASTER LINK WATER - MASTER LINK 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 53.92 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 4.80 FAC MAINT - FIRE EXTINGUISHERS9533662681 FAC MAINT - FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 67.32 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.99 Total :132.03 101844 1/24/2008 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 06713.00-14 E6DA.Services thru 11/17/07 E6DA.Services thru 11/17/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 27,050.50 E6DA.Services thru 12/15/0706713.00-15 E6DA.Services thru 12/15/07 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 30,444.41 26Page: Packet Page 49 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :57,494.911018441/24/2008 071391 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 101845 1/24/2008 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 188307 UNIT 621 - JIFFY STAND SPRING, GALFER UNIT 621 - JIFFY STAND SPRING, GALFER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 425.40 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.87 UNIT 100 - MUFFLER MOUNT188962 UNIT 100 - MUFFLER MOUNT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.14 Total :465.01 101846 1/24/2008 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 00793549 036570 FLOWMETER/VALVE BALL/PIPE/BUSHING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 911.14 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 19.64 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 82.85 03657000793583 VALVE BALL/PIPE/COUPLING/BUSHING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 383.60 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 22.56 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 36.15 Total :1,455.94 101847 1/24/2008 013007 HASNER, EZRA J 9 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,303.56 Total :1,303.56 101848 1/24/2008 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 5278-35 RESPIRATORY REVIEWS/SLENKER/ZUVELA 27Page: Packet Page 50 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101848 1/24/2008 (Continued)069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED RESPIRATORY REVIEWS/SLENKER/ZUVELA 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 89.00 Total :89.00 101849 1/24/2008 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 2126-90 MEDICAL PROF SERVICES ALS fit for duty:BS,JS,DC 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,981.00 Prev fit for duty:MS 001.000.510.522.300.410.00 683.00 Ops fit for duty:HP,AY,JM,DD,AT 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 3,259.00 Total :5,923.00 101850 1/24/2008 065980 ISS-WONDERWARE 312050 WATER/SEWER - SOFTWARE SUPPORT LICENSE WATER/SEWER - SOFTWARE SUPPORT LICENSE 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 900.00 WATER/SEWER - SOFTWARE SUPPORT LICENSE 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 900.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 80.10 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 80.10 Total :1,960.20 101851 1/24/2008 066913 KDL HARDWARE SUPPLY INC 352726 CITY HALL IT - PUSHBUTTON LOCK WITH CITY HALL IT - PUSHBUTTON LOCK WITH 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 320.83 Freight 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 6.75 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 29.15 Total :356.73 101852 1/24/2008 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO 74753 FAC BOILERS - RELIEF VALVE, HIGH 28Page: Packet Page 51 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101852 1/24/2008 (Continued)017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO FAC BOILERS - RELIEF VALVE, HIGH 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 538.38 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.65 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.92 Total :607.95 101853 1/24/2008 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0022366 Antonyuk Retaining Wall Review Antonyuk Retaining Wall Review 001.000.000.245.900.621.00 413.75 Total :413.75 101854 1/24/2008 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 097005 ENVELOPES ENVELOPES WITH RETURN ADDRESS 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 155.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 13.80 Total :168.80 101855 1/24/2008 018970 LYNNWOOD DODGE DOCS253037 UNIT 10 - STEERING REPAIR UNIT 10 - STEERING REPAIR 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 98.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 8.72 Total :106.72 101856 1/24/2008 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 78522091 123106800 LIGHT BULBS 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 86.40 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.12 29Page: Packet Page 52 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101856 1/24/2008 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 12310680078525040 EXTERNAL RING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 211.20 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.80 12310680078712992 PIPE FITTINGS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 43.20 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.47 12310680078886546 BATTERY 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 32.92 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.83 Total :394.94 101857 1/24/2008 063773 MICROFLEX 00017529 2008 TaxTools Data Conversion Fee 2008 TaxTools Data Conversion Fee 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 300.00 Total :300.00 101858 1/24/2008 023870 NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSOC 29568 McIntosh 2008 MEMBERSHIP BRIAN MCINTOSH:~ 001.000.640.574.100.490.00 135.00 Total :135.00 101859 1/24/2008 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0216649-IN UNIT 106 - FIRE EXTINGUISHERS UNIT 106 - FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 199.80 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 46.58 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.94 30Page: Packet Page 53 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :268.321018591/24/2008 064570 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 101860 1/24/2008 024001 NC MACHINERY CO SECS0458557 UNIT 57 - TIP-SOIL DIG, ADAPTER, UNIT 57 - TIP-SOIL DIG, ADAPTER, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 204.50 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.81 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.03 Total :257.34 101861 1/24/2008 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0359120-IN FLEET FILTER INVENTORY FLEET FILTER INVENTORY 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 48.30 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 4.15 Total :52.45 101862 1/24/2008 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0656312 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 233.84 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0658554 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0659561 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 92.20 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0659562 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02 Total :522.08 101863 1/24/2008 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 525 PB Minutetaker 1/9/08 ~ PB Minutetaker 1/9/08 ~ 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 560.00 31Page: Packet Page 54 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101863 1/24/2008 (Continued)025690 NOYES, KARIN HPC Minutetaker 12/13/07000 00 526 HPC Minutetaker 12/13/07 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 144.00 Total :704.00 101864 1/24/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 708789 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE:~ 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.90 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES745211 COPY PAPER, ETC. 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 203.36 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 18.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES775717 LASER CARTRIDGES, ETC. 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 263.98 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 23.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES797760 COLORED PAPER, ETC. 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 93.33 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 8.31 Total :628.99 101865 1/24/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 636769 520437 LOG BOOK 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 54.40 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 4.85 32Page: Packet Page 55 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101865 1/24/2008 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 520437671380 DIVIDERS/MARKERS/PENS/COPIER PAPER 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 60.60 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 5.39 520437759876 INDEX DIVIDERS/INJET CARTRIDGES 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 102.04 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 9.08 Total :236.36 101866 1/24/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 742927 PW ADMIN SCHEDULER REFIL PW ADMIN SCHEDULER REFIL 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 -22.24 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 -1.98 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - FOLDERS, DIVIDERS,768153 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES - FOLDERS, DIVIDERS, 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 105.53 WATER - PRINTER INK CTGS 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 42.65 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 9.39 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.79 Total :137.14 101867 1/24/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 697853 Office Supplies DSD Office Supplies DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 316.58 Office Supplies DSD777797 Office Supplies DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 233.08 33Page: Packet Page 56 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :549.661018671/24/2008 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 101868 1/24/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 629576 PREV SUPPLIES whistles 001.000.510.522.300.310.00 7.66 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.300.310.00 0.68 Total :8.34 101869 1/24/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC 900966 INV#900996 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD 34Page: Packet Page 57 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101869 1/24/2008 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT INC DYMO LABEL WRITER 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 97.49 20 CARTONS OF XEROX PAPER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 669.00 TISSUES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 71.28 FILING SUPPLIES - SUPPLY ROOM 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 98.53 EXPANDING FILE FOR LIM 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 11.44 SUPPLIES FOR CLERKS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 266.24 12 DOZEN PENS FOR PATROL 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 99.36 PAPER, PENS, CLIPS FOR SUPPLY RM 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 543.36 RIBBONS FOR RECEIPT MACHINE 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 15.66 BOXES OF 100 CD SLEEVES 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 48.90 INK, BINDER, DIVIDERS FOR PROP RM 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 146.93 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.300.310.00 8.68 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 123.01 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 9.86 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 29.44 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 13.08 Total :2,252.26 101870 1/24/2008 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00046770 UNIT 55 - ROCKER SWITCH 35Page: Packet Page 58 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101870 1/24/2008 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY UNIT 55 - ROCKER SWITCH 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 82.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.18 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.11 Total :99.29 101871 1/24/2008 063588 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS CO 6236803-00 UNIT 475 - HOSE ASSEMBLY , 5 GALLON UNIT 475 - HOSE ASSEMBLY , 5 GALLON 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 528.82 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 59.14 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 52.33 Total :640.29 101872 1/24/2008 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.664732 PAINT PAINT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.90 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.68 PAINT & SUPPLIES664746 PAINT AND SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 211.93 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.87 Total :251.38 101873 1/24/2008 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.664502 CITY HALL - PAINT SUPPLIES CITY HALL - PAINT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.51 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.83 36Page: Packet Page 59 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101873 1/24/2008 (Continued)027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC. FAC - PAINT666972 FAC - PAINT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.12 Total :36.01 101874 1/24/2008 072064 PCC NATURAL MARKET REC# 45631 Refund to PCC Market Receipt #45631 Refund to PCC Market Receipt #45631 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 300.00 Total :300.00 101875 1/24/2008 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100-JA08 DM1000 MAILING SYSTEM LEASE DM1000 Mailing System and~250-00189 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 866.00 Total :866.00 101876 1/24/2008 070431 PITNEY BOWES PURCHASE POWER 8000900010587875 PURCHASE POWER ACCOUNT FEES Purchase Power Account Fees250-00188 001.000.250.514.300.420.00 32.96 Total :32.96 101877 1/24/2008 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 0003870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER Pier Electricity for DEC 07 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 42.56 Stormwater Rent & Leasehold tax JAN 08 411.000.652.542.900.450.00 472.83 SVC FEE 411.000.652.542.900.450.00 10.00 UNIT F1 B1 FUEL04371 Fire Boat - Fuel AND LATE FEE 511.000.657.548.680.320.00 132.34 Total :657.73 101878 1/24/2008 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 MCC 37Page: Packet Page 60 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101878 1/24/2008 (Continued)064088 PROTECTION ONE 24 hour alarm monitoring MCC~ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 96.00 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING-PARKS~291104 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING-PARKS~ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 44.93 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING-PARKS~ 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.92 Fire Monitoring F/S 16~ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 90.00 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL31146525 24 hour alarm monitoring-CH~ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00 Total :310.85 101879 1/24/2008 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 08084S-1 Q1-2008 Clean Air Assessment per RCW Q1-2008 Clean Air Assessment per RCW 001.000.390.531.700.510.00 5,711.75 Total :5,711.75 101880 1/24/2008 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B FLOW METERING STATIONS TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.82 Total :137.82 101881 1/24/2008 031060 RADIX CORPORATION 001072 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT FEB 08 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT FEB 08 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 166.28 Total :166.28 101882 1/24/2008 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SERVICES 19632 INV#19632 CUST#00000661 EDMONDS PD SERVICE - MAIN READER NOT WORK. 001.000.410.521.100.480.00 259.50 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.480.00 23.10 38Page: Packet Page 61 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101882 1/24/2008 (Continued)066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SERVICES INV# 19636 CUST#00000661 EDMONDS PD19636 SERVICE CALL - DOOR NOT WORK 001.000.410.521.100.480.00 129.75 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.480.00 11.55 Total :423.90 101883 1/24/2008 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9413691523 WATER - COLD MIX ASPHALT WATER - COLD MIX ASPHALT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 529.10 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 47.09 WATER - ASPHALT COLD MIX9413915872 WATER - ASPHALT COLD MIX 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 172.90 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.38 WATER - ASPHALT ATB9414068637 WATER - ASPHALT ATB 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 81.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.21 WATE - ASPHALT COLD MIX9414068638 WATE - ASPHALT COLD MIX 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 130.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.57 Total :994.25 101884 1/24/2008 065001 SCHIRMAN, RON 10 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,703.70 Total :1,703.70 101885 1/24/2008 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 121581 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 39Page: Packet Page 62 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101885 1/24/2008 (Continued)061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 14 helmets 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 830.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 12.16 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 74.95 Total :917.11 101886 1/24/2008 068816 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 63054788 8726744 EXTINGUISHER INSPECTION 411.000.656.538.800.410.21 515.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.21 29.82 Total :544.82 101887 1/24/2008 065119 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB 0469413-IN INV#0469413-IN CUST#00-A98020 EDMONDS PD LABE CHEMICALS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 269.75 HAZ MAT FEE 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 20.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 34.26 Total :324.01 101888 1/24/2008 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 19-020682 UNIT 21 - DRYER KIT, CARTRIDGE UNIT 21 - DRYER KIT, CARTRIDGE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 145.53 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.52 Total :158.05 101889 1/24/2008 036955 SKY NURSERY 266483 ANDERSON CENTER BEAUTIFICATION 40Page: Packet Page 63 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101889 1/24/2008 (Continued)036955 SKY NURSERY FLOWERS FOR ANDERSON CENTER 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.05 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.76 ANDERSON CENTER BEAUTIFICATION266484 GROUNDCOVERS AND PLANTS FOR ANDERSON 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 87.21 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.76 Total :128.78 101890 1/24/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2470011830 PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,500.01 IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014245 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.69 Total :1,531.70 101891 1/24/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2340018510 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 86.11 LIFT STATION #102400010746 LIFT STATION #10 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 185.93 LIFT STATION #22410016253 LIFT STATION #2 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 85.28 SIGNAL LIGHT3180012308 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 34.23 LIBRARY3720012057 LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,140.28 41Page: Packet Page 64 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101891 1/24/2008 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3970013581 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 32.18 LIFT STATION #143980029445 LIFT STATION #14 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 32.67 Public Works4840011953 Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 105.07 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 399.28 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 399.28 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 399.28 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 399.28 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 399.29 STREET LIGHT5370016262 STREET LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 32.67 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX5390028164 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 6,329.71 CITY HALL5410010689 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,437.22 Total :15,497.76 101892 1/24/2008 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO February 2008 FEBRUARY 2008 STANDARD INS PREMIUMS February 2008 Standard Insurance 811.000.000.231.550.000.00 18,720.72 Total :18,720.72 42Page: Packet Page 65 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101893 1/24/2008 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON Q4-2007 Q4-07 Leasehold Tax Liability Q4-07 Leasehold Tax Liability 001.000.000.237.220.000.00 4,643.67 Total :4,643.67 101894 1/24/2008 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2640004 WATER / SEWER - SAFETY GLASSES, ELECT WATER / SEWER - SAFETY GLASSES, ELECT 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 130.56 WATER / SEWER - SAFETY GLASSES, ELECT 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 130.56 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.23 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.23 Total :283.58 101895 1/24/2008 071585 STERICYCLE INC 0004279578 INV#0004279578 CUST#6076358 EDMONDS PD MEDIUM BOX HAZ WASTE DISPOSAL 001.000.410.521.910.410.00 53.37 Total :53.37 101896 1/24/2008 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1316720 CEMETERY - ELECT SUPPLIES CEMETERY - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.40 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.99 CITY PARK BLDG - ELECT SUPPLIES1316721 CITY PARK BLDG - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.09 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.99 FAC MAINT - BATTERIES, SUPPLIES1322151 FAC MAINT - BATTERIES, SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 117.30 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.44 43Page: Packet Page 66 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :164.211018961/24/2008 040430 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 101897 1/24/2008 070837 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 136299968-001 LIFT RENTAL RENTAL OF 60' MANLIFT 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 464.60 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 90.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 48.98 Total :603.58 101898 1/24/2008 067835 T-MOBILE 135840772 CELL PHONE USEAGE PARK MAINTENANCE CELL PHONES 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 85.76 Total :85.76 101899 1/24/2008 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10625935 SUPPLIES EARMUFFS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 24.63 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.54 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.60 Total :31.77 101900 1/24/2008 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10622300 WATER - PARTS WATER - PARTS 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 790.66 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 70.37 Total :861.03 101901 1/24/2008 071577 TAYLOR, KATHLEEN 1020 Consultant Serv. 12/18/07 - 1/9/08 Consultant Serv. 12/18/07 - 1/9/08 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 1,105.00 Total :1,105.00 44Page: Packet Page 67 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101902 1/24/2008 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1561894 Legal notice: V-07-94 (ESD) Legal notice: V-07-94 (ESD) 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 21.46 Legal Notice: V-07-94 (ESD)1563743 Legal Notice: V-07-94 (ESD) 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 19.98 Legal Notice V-07-96 (Mucci)1563798 Legal Notice V-07-96 (Mucci) 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 24.42 Legal Notice: ADU -07-99 (Penard)1563800 Legal Notice: ADU -07-99 (Penard) 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 16.28 Total :82.14 101903 1/24/2008 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 223675 LIBRARY - PLUMBING SUPPLIES LIBRARY - PLUMBING SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 822.08 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 73.17 LIBRARY - MIRROR224038 LIBRARY - MIRROR 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 155.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.84 Total :1,064.59 101904 1/24/2008 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 442685 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE~ CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE~ 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 775.91 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 69.05 MONITORING-PS442686 monitoring-PS~ 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 37.36 45Page: Packet Page 68 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101904 1/24/2008 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE~454177 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE~ 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 138.19 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 12.29 Total :1,032.80 101905 1/24/2008 064905 TYDI CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING 452127 CUT TRENCH CUT TRENCH 411.000.656.538.800.410.21 350.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.21 31.15 Total :381.15 101906 1/24/2008 072098 UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES LLC 45221 E6DA.ROW Services thru Dec 2007 E6DA.ROW Services thru Dec 2007 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 904.27 Total :904.27 101907 1/24/2008 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE POSTAGE FOR CITY METER Postage for City Meter250-00187 001.000.250.514.300.420.00 8,000.00 Total :8,000.00 101908 1/24/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 45.32 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.67 CITY PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG-EMAIL425-771-1124 CITY PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG-EMAIL 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 53.43 46Page: Packet Page 69 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101908 1/24/2008 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 52.69 YOST POOL425-775-2645 YOST POOL 001.000.640.575.510.420.00 56.89 Total :253.00 101909 1/24/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 771-0423 03 0260 1032797592 07 AFTER HOURS 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 55.66 Total :55.66 101910 1/24/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM LIBRARY SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR425-640-8169 Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.78 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE425-672-7132 FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 73.59 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS425-775-1534 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 160.55 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 298.15 Radio Line between Public Works & UB425-775-7865 Radio Line between Public Works & UB 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 52.06 LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281 LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 45.32 47Page: Packet Page 70 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101910 1/24/2008 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829 CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 118.84 1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530 1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.40 PUBLIC WORKS CPNNECTION TO 911425-RT0-9133 Public Works Connection to 911 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48 Public Works Connection to 911 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78 Total :954.07 101911 1/24/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-774-0944 FS #20-FAX LINE FS #20-FAX LINE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 51.62 Total :51.62 101912 1/24/2008 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0619254307 Mayor Haakenson cell phone service 1/7 Mayor Haakenson cell phone service 1/7 001.000.210.513.100.420.00 123.50 Gary Haakenson cell phone service 1/7 - 001.000.210.513.100.420.00 13.98 Total :137.48 101913 1/24/2008 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 425-706-3334 C/A 370106564-00002 48Page: Packet Page 71 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101913 1/24/2008 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Cell Phone Jim Stevens 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 49.91 206-999-9374464229910-1 sewer lead cell phone 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 69.77 425-870-0617469985965-1 Cell phone-Jim Waite 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 64.72 Cell phone-Jim Waite 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 64.71 SIGN SHOP CELL - T HANSEN471082983-00001 SIGN SHOP/#64 CELL -T HANSEN 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 39.75 CELL PHONE-STREET LEAD570091643-00001 CELL PHONE-STREET LEAD 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 33.90 425-231-2668769986915-01 cell phone-water lead 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 39.29 206-947-3220964212899-00001 cell phone water quality 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 39.29 Total :401.34 101914 1/24/2008 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 33032138 1066294 PETRI DISH 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 136.83 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 12.17 Total :149.00 101915 1/24/2008 068180 WA CITIZENS-RESOURCE CONSERV 2008 DUES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES - S FISHER ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES - S FISHER 411.000.654.537.900.490.00 50.00 49Page: Packet Page 72 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :50.001019151/24/2008 068180 068180 WA CITIZENS-RESOURCE CONSERV 101916 1/24/2008 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I08030711 INV#I08030711 BACKGROUND CHECK - 11/07 BACKGROUND CHECK - 11/07 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 38.50 Total :38.50 101917 1/24/2008 071359 WASSER CORPORATION 110155 564 PAINT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 318.60 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 28.04 Total :346.64 101918 1/24/2008 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 4860597-2677-6 201-0170717-2677-6 ASH DISPOSAL 411.000.656.538.800.474.65 4,792.87 Total :4,792.87 101919 1/24/2008 068227 WCFA WCFA2008 2008 DUES 2008 VOTING MEMBER DUES 130.000.640.536.200.490.00 219.60 Total :219.60 101920 1/24/2008 026510 WCIA 0831 2008 Liability and/or Property 50Page: Packet Page 73 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 51 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101920 1/24/2008 (Continued)026510 WCIA 2008 Liability and/or Property 001.000.390.519.900.460.00 417,704.59 2008 Liability and/or Property 111.000.653.542.900.460.00 32,976.68 2008 Liability and/or Property 411.000.652.542.900.460.00 32,976.68 2008 Liability and/or Property 411.000.654.534.800.460.00 76,160.42 2008 Liability and/or Property 411.000.655.535.800.460.00 115,418.37 2008 Liability and/or Property 411.000.656.538.800.460.00 81,656.54 2008 Liability and/or Property 511.000.657.548.680.460.00 28,265.72 Total :785,159.00 101921 1/24/2008 068150 WESTERN TIRE CHAIN 20876 UNIT 475,476 CHAINS UNIT 475,476 CHAINS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 136.56 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.74 UNITS 474,475,476,477 - TIRE CHAINS20877 UNITS 474,475,476,477 - TIRE CHAINS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 864.60 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 74.36 UNIT 477 & 474 - CHAINS20879 UNIT 477 & 474 - CHAINS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 136.56 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.74 Total :1,235.56 101922 1/24/2008 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 36348001 ANDERSON CENTER BEAUTIFICATION 51Page: Packet Page 74 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 52 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101922 1/24/2008 (Continued)064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS PLANTS FOR ANDERSON CENTER 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 362.25 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.24 Total :394.49 101923 1/24/2008 064234 WILDWATER RIVER TOURS INC AMUNDSON8890 SKAGIT EAGLE WATCH SKAGIT BALD EAGLE WATCH~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 326.16 Total :326.16 101924 1/24/2008 065179 WSAPT TREASURER WSAPT Membership App WSAPT 2008 Membership Dues for: WSAPT 2008 Membership Dues for: 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 140.00 Total :140.00 101925 1/24/2008 064170 WSRA 27 RECYCLING INDUSTRY MEMBERSHIP - ~ RECYCLING INDUSTRY MEMBERSHIP - ~ 411.000.654.537.900.490.00 150.00 Total :150.00 101926 1/24/2008 061047 WWCPA 2008 ANNUAL RENEWAL WWCPA CERT RENEWALS (4) - L MCMURPHY, J WWCPA CERT RENEWALS (4) - L MCMURPHY, J 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 60.00 WWCPA CERT RENEWALS (5) - J CLEMENS, A 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 75.00 Total :135.00 101927 1/24/2008 071497 ZURICH NORTH AMERICA M017651979-001-00001 FLEET STORAGE TANK INSURANCE RENEWAL - FLEET STORAGE TANK INSURANCE RENEWAL - 511.000.657.548.680.460.00 1,327.00 Total :1,327.00 Bank total : 1,493,618.80149 Vouchers for bank code :front 1,493,618.80Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report149 52Page: Packet Page 75 of 415 01/24/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 53 11:59:41AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 53Page: Packet Page 76 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101928 1/31/2008 064622 A.I.R. EMISSIONS 80114 FLEET - VEHICLE EMISSION TESTINGS FLEET - VEHICLE EMISSION TESTINGS 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 378.00 EMISSION CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 14.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 2.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 5.88 Total :399.88 101929 1/31/2008 068201 ACTIVE NETWORK LTD INC007560 RECEIPT PRINTER PAPER PAPER FOR ITHACA RECEIPT PRINTER 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 57.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 5.07 Total :62.07 101930 1/31/2008 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND FEB 2008 KENNELING SERVICES FEBRUARY/EDMONDS PD FEBRUARY 2008 KENNELING SERVICES 001.000.410.521.700.410.00 1,921.23 Total :1,921.23 101931 1/31/2008 069803 AIRVAC 11477 FS 20 - AIR VAC 4 STAGE FILTER PACKS FS 20 - AIR VAC 4 STAGE FILTER PACKS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1,200.00 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 150.00 Total :1,350.00 101932 1/31/2008 069565 AMERICAN LAFRANCE NW LLC P55443 UNIT 476 - WHEEL CABLE, WASHERS, SLEEVE 1Page: Packet Page 77 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101932 1/31/2008 (Continued)069565 AMERICAN LAFRANCE NW LLC UNIT 476 - WHEEL CABLE, WASHERS, SLEEVE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,063.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.56 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 96.26 Total :1,177.82 101933 1/31/2008 063402 APA PLANNERS BOOK SERVICE 120040 ADDITIONAL FEE FOR PUBLICATIONS FROM APA Additional fee for publications from APA 001.000.610.519.700.490.00 6.95 Total :6.95 101934 1/31/2008 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 40333886 UNIT 70 - ELASTOMERIC COUPLINGS UNIT 70 - ELASTOMERIC COUPLINGS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.49 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.82 Total :10.31 101935 1/31/2008 069751 ARAMARK 512-4077663 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.36 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.70 Total :33.06 101936 1/31/2008 069751 ARAMARK 512-4071438 UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 96.17 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.56 Total :104.73 101937 1/31/2008 069751 ARAMARK 512-4063548 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 2Page: Packet Page 78 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101937 1/31/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC512-4069689 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 FLEET UNIFORM SVC512-4075961 FLEET UNIFORM SVC 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 19.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.74 3Page: Packet Page 79 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101937 1/31/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS512-4075962 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC512-4075963 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 4Page: Packet Page 80 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101937 1/31/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC512-4077664 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.60 Total :116.52 101938 1/31/2008 071120 ASHLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICALS 2500051146 113009/0702 POLYMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.51 1,937.50 Total :1,937.50 101939 1/31/2008 064343 AT&T 425-771-1124 PARKS MAINT. BLDG PARKS MAINT. BLDG 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 34.39 CEMETERY425-771-4741 CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 34.39 Total :68.78 101940 1/31/2008 064343 AT&T 730386050200 PUBLIC WORKS LINES Public Works Lines 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 1.82 Public Works Lines 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 6.92 Public Works Lines 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 6.92 Public Works Lines 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 6.92 Public Works Lines 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 6.92 Public Works Lines 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 6.93 Total :36.43 5Page: Packet Page 81 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101941 1/31/2008 064343 AT&T 425-771-0152 STATION #16 FAX STATION #16 FAX 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 34.68 Total :34.68 101942 1/31/2008 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 74917 UNIT P09 - DOOR AND FRONT GRAPHICS UNIT P09 - DOOR AND FRONT GRAPHICS 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 125.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 11.13 Total :136.13 101943 1/31/2008 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 43669 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #500 PRINTING 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 36.78 UB Outsourcing area #500 PRINTING 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 36.78 UB Outsourcing area #500 PRINTING 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 36.88 UB Outsourcing area #500 POSTAGE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 110.58 UB Outsourcing area #500 POSTAGE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 110.58 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.27 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.27 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.29 6Page: Packet Page 82 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101943 1/31/2008 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS43784 UB Outsourcing area #600 PRINTING 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 30.62 UB Outsourcing area #600 PRINTING 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 30.62 UB Outsourcing area #600 PRINTING 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 30.72 UB Outsourcing area #600 POSTAGE 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 96.45 UB Outsourcing area #600 POSTAGE 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 96.44 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.72 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.72 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.74 Total :634.46 101944 1/31/2008 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2007-452 INV#2007-452 - EDMONDS PD PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENING~ 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 175.00 Total :175.00 101945 1/31/2008 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 229 Prof Serv - Bitco - DSD Prof Serv - Bitco - DSD 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 1,250.00 Total :1,250.00 101946 1/31/2008 064834 BOTHELL FEED CENTER 362914 Straw for STORM RESPONSE CLEANUP Straw for STORM RESPONSE CLEANUP 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 179.25 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 15.95 7Page: Packet Page 83 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :195.201019461/31/2008 064834 064834 BOTHELL FEED CENTER 101947 1/31/2008 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY116073 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 31.15 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 16.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 4.19 ALS SUPPLIESLY116074 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 41.53 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 16.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 5.12 ALS SUPPLIESLY116075 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 20.77 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 16.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.27 Total :154.03 101948 1/31/2008 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT8894 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #8894 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 90.30 Total :90.30 101949 1/31/2008 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460816269 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 23.16 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.06 8Page: Packet Page 84 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101949 1/31/2008 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION OPS UNIFORMS460816270 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 129.93 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.57 UNIFORMS460817317 Stn. 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 96.80 Stn. 17 - OPS 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 96.80 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 8.62 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 8.61 OPS UNIFORMS460817338 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 140.43 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.50 UNIFORMS460821455 volunteers 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 23.16 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 2.06 OPS UNIFORMS460821456 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 120.80 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.75 Total :687.25 101950 1/31/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1884135 OPS SUPPLIES 9Page: Packet Page 85 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101950 1/31/2008 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 70.23 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 6.50 Total :79.48 101951 1/31/2008 065566 COLLINS, AMY AMY COLLINS UNIFORM COST REIMBURSEMENT/COLLINS UNIFORM PANTS-AMY COLLINS 001.000.410.521.110.240.00 310.37 Total :310.37 101952 1/31/2008 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC 009286 UNIT 36 - REPAIRS UNIT 36 - REPAIRS 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 812.20 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 72.29 Total :884.49 101953 1/31/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 2276 ACCT#2276 - GANNON REGISTRATION/GANNON~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 25.00 PORTABLE GARAGE CANOPY~ 104.000.410.521.210.350.00 2,199.00 ACCT #3263 - O'BRIEN3263 ASTRO PRESSURIZED REFILL (BLACK)~ 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 62.62 ACCT #8272 - EDMONDS8272 MEALS/MACK AND MILLS~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 45.94 LODGING - OFFICER MACK~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 170.85 PACKAGE MAILED 001.000.410.521.100.420.00 25.72 10Page: Packet Page 86 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101953 1/31/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS ACCT#8298 - BARD8298 ENGRAVING & PLAQUE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 75.14 2007 RCW CD'S 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 108.40 LODGING/OFFICER MILLS~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 170.85 REGISTRATION/ANDERSON & LAWLESS~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 675.00 Total :3,558.52 101954 1/31/2008 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM9080 IRISH DANCE CLASSES IRISH DANCE 13+~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 287.00 IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #9001 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 95.20 IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #9003 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 252.00 IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #9013 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 67.20 Total :701.40 101955 1/31/2008 005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE CRETIN0126 GYM MONITOR ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR~ 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 36.00 Total :36.00 101956 1/31/2008 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 88547 SUBSCRIPTION FOR 2008 DJC Subscription for 2008 001.000.610.519.700.490.00 220.00 Total :220.00 101957 1/31/2008 064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN 201596040 FAC MAINT - GLOVES, TT, GARB LINERS 11Page: Packet Page 87 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101957 1/31/2008 (Continued)064422 DEPT OF GENERAL ADMIN FAC MAINT - GLOVES, TT, GARB LINERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 271.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.81 Total :294.36 101958 1/31/2008 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 08-2832 So Co Cities Alliance Minutes Sept-Nov So Co Cities Alliance Minutes Sept-Nov 001.000.000.237.910.000.00 294.00 Total :294.00 101959 1/31/2008 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 08-2833 MINUTE TAKING 1/22 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 327.00 Total :327.00 101960 1/31/2008 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02306334 LIBRARY - CEDAR SUPPLIES LIBRARY - CEDAR SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 331.24 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 29.48 Total :360.72 101961 1/31/2008 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 08-00308 WATER QUALITY -LAB SAMPLES WATER QUALITY -LAB SAMPLES 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 884.00 Total :884.00 101962 1/31/2008 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 90431 SUPPLIES STARTER DRIVE, STARTER REPAIR 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 110.00 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 9.79 12Page: Packet Page 88 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101962 1/31/2008 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES90489 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.99 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.98 Total :131.76 101963 1/31/2008 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 81366 UNIT 486 - ONE PIECE BLADE UNIT 486 - ONE PIECE BLADE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.76 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.36 UNIT 486 - KNOB85708 UNIT 486 - KNOB 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.32 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.30 Total :44.74 101964 1/31/2008 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 11951 NEWSLETTER INSERTS NEWSLETTER INSERTS FOR SISTER CITY 623.200.210.557.210.490.00 80.00 Total :80.00 101965 1/31/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11 LIFT STATION #11 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.25 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE3-03575 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 191.15 LIFT STATION #123-07525 LIFT STATION #12 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 63.32 13Page: Packet Page 89 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101965 1/31/2008 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION LIFT STATION #153-07709 LIFT STATION #15 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 24.90 LIFT STATION #43-09350 LIFT STATION #4 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 88.85 LIFT STATION #103-09800 LIFT STATION #10 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 41.31 LIFT STATION #93-29875 LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 37.66 Total :468.44 101966 1/31/2008 066004 ESRI 91686584 ARC VIEW 9.2 SINGLE USE LICENSE Arc View 9.2 Single Use License~310-00086 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 1,200.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 100.80 Total :1,300.80 101967 1/31/2008 071311 FORMS AND FILING INC 112418A INV#112418A - EDMONDS POLICE FILE LABELS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 90.80 Freight 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 8.98 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 8.88 Total :108.66 101968 1/31/2008 010665 FOSTER PEPPER PLLC 878440 Oct-Dec 07 Legal Services for Fiber Oct-Dec 07 Legal Services for Fiber 001.000.390.528.200.410.00 3,296.05 Total :3,296.05 14Page: Packet Page 90 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101969 1/31/2008 069222 GILBERT, DANIEL BOOTS 2008 2008 BOOT ALLOWANCE - D GILBERT ~ 2008 BOOT ALLOWANCE - D GILBERT ~ 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 169.50 Total :169.50 101970 1/31/2008 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 90346988 STREET - CONCRETE STREET - CONCRETE 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 322.50 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 28.70 Total :351.20 101971 1/31/2008 012199 GRAINGER 9541573516 SUPPLIES EAR MUFFS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.87 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.85 SUPPLIES9541573524 SAFETY EYEWEAR 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 64.20 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.71 SUPPLIES9549412618 EAR MUFFS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.95 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.04 SUPPLIES9550496054 GLOVES, EAR MUFFS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.25 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.87 Total :140.74 101972 1/31/2008 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 1030-90 Drug testing services 15Page: Packet Page 91 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101972 1/31/2008 (Continued)069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED Drug testing services 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 50.00 Total :50.00 101973 1/31/2008 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 12 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 20.00 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement14 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,122.00 Total :1,142.00 101974 1/31/2008 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1034139 0205/SUPPLIES MOSS ROOF 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 65.16 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.80 0205/SUPPLIES2031923 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.94 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.84 0205/SUPPLIES34272 MOSS ROOF 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 65.16 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.80 0205/SUPPLIES4095857 SOILSCOOP, HAND TOOLS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 53.09 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.73 16Page: Packet Page 92 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101974 1/31/2008 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 0205/SUPPLIES4571997 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.87 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.70 0205/SUPPLIES4592699 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.40 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.35 0205/SUPPLIES7097469 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.96 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.42 0205/SUPPLIES8045549 SAKRETE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 66.60 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.93 0205 - SUPPLIES9031092 BLADE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.27 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.65 0205/SUPPLIES9031137 SAKRETE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 55.50 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.94 0205/SUPPLIES9097297 NAILS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.90 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.70 17Page: Packet Page 93 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :438.711019741/31/2008 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 101975 1/31/2008 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS N Tool 17398812 Unit 55 36" Load Release Northern Tool Unit 55 36" Load Release Northern Tool 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 170.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.26 Total :190.26 101976 1/31/2008 072092 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 100721 BIO BARRIER BIO BARRIER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 299.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.31 Total :325.31 101977 1/31/2008 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 440009044434 ACCT # 430001405909 Directory Listings P&R - Feb 08 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 117.50 Total :117.50 101978 1/31/2008 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 75426001 COPIER LEASE COPIER LEASE:~ 001.000.640.574.100.450.00 495.73 Total :495.73 101979 1/31/2008 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 75409102 INV#75409102 - EDMONDS POLICE RENTAL AND ADDITIONA IMAGES 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 1,272.97 Total :1,272.97 101980 1/31/2008 065980 ISS-WONDERWARE 312016 CITY OF EDMONDS SOFTWARE SUPPORT 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 6,234.46 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 554.87 18Page: Packet Page 94 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :6,789.331019801/31/2008 065980 065980 ISS-WONDERWARE 101981 1/31/2008 070192 JA SEXAUER 172853582 PW - REELMOUNT HOSE REEL PW - REELMOUNT HOSE REEL 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.14 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.56 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.38 Total :78.08 101982 1/31/2008 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 379373 54278825 HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 2,984.94 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 262.67 Total :3,247.61 101983 1/31/2008 067552 KING CO FINANCE & BUSINESS 7810024 TRAINING MISC EMS on-line subscription 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 2,900.00 Total :2,900.00 101984 1/31/2008 016600 KROESENS INC 82599 PREVENTION UNIFORMS Fire Marshal shirts & nametags 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 76.80 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.300.240.00 6.84 OPS UNIFORMS83484 Uniform accessories 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 947.30 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 84.31 19Page: Packet Page 95 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101984 1/31/2008 (Continued)016600 KROESENS INC VOLUNTEER UNIFORMS84827 Assaker,Carver,Reinke belts 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 50.70 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 6.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 5.09 Total :1,177.54 101985 1/31/2008 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 330630-001 STORM - PRO SERIES 25' POWER TAPE STORM - PRO SERIES 25' POWER TAPE 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 33.90 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 3.02 Total :36.92 101986 1/31/2008 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 331356-001 Bond paper for Large Plotter DSD Bond paper for Large Plotter DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 100.62 Total :100.62 101987 1/31/2008 072101 KYOCHARO USA LLC 11272007 TOURISM AD IN KOREAN NEWS PUBLICATION Tourism ad in Korean News - LTAC 120.000.310.575.420.410.00 2,000.00 Total :2,000.00 101988 1/31/2008 060132 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 1010852230 STREET - EARPLUGS STREET - EARPLUGS 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 159.60 Freight 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 12.27 Total :171.87 101989 1/31/2008 066064 LISTEN AUDIOLOGY SERVICE INC 1854 Hearing Testing on 12/11/07 (28 Hearing Testing on 12/11/07 (28 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 595.00 20Page: Packet Page 96 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :595.001019891/31/2008 066064 066064 LISTEN AUDIOLOGY SERVICE INC 101990 1/31/2008 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 097073 Office Supplies - L. Carl Office Supplies - L. Carl 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 98.00 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 8.72 Total :106.72 101991 1/31/2008 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 097060 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARKS & RECREATION LETTERHEAD 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 128.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 11.39 Total :139.39 101992 1/31/2008 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 097074 Window Envelopes Window Envelopes 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 196.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 17.44 Total :213.44 101993 1/31/2008 068950 MARYSVILLE FIRE DISTRICT 08-021 TRAINING MISC Kuhn Captain's College 001.000.510.522.400.490.00 249.00 Total :249.00 101994 1/31/2008 019940 MC COMAS, GARY 16 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 210.71 Total :210.71 101995 1/31/2008 071950 MCVAY'S MOBILE WELDING LLC 5686 STREET - ALUMINUM RAILING REPAIRS 21Page: Packet Page 97 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101995 1/31/2008 (Continued)071950 MCVAY'S MOBILE WELDING LLC STREET - ALUMINUM RAILING REPAIRS 111.000.653.542.310.480.00 3,990.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.480.00 355.11 Total :4,345.11 101996 1/31/2008 072100 MEHL, ANDY ANDY MEHL UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT/ANDY MEHL UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT~ 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 141.54 Total :141.54 101997 1/31/2008 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 61988 SEWER - 1 DAY RENTAL - HEATER/PROPANE SEWER - 1 DAY RENTAL - HEATER/PROPANE 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 25.00 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 2.23 Total :27.23 101998 1/31/2008 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0216231-IN WATER/SEWER - BLACK DUNGR 22Page: Packet Page 98 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101998 1/31/2008 (Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC WATER/SEWER - BLACK DUNGR 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 84.38 WATER/SEWER - BLACK DUNGR 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 84.37 BR DUNGR 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 84.38 BR DUNGR 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 84.37 RELXD FIT 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 60.30 RELXD FIT 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 60.30 RELXD FIT JEANS 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 60.30 RELXD FIT JEANS 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 60.30 WASHED DUNGR 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 70.35 WASHED DUNGR 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 70.35 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 32.02 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.240.00 32.01 Total :783.43 101999 1/31/2008 024001 NC MACHINERY CO SECS0458723 UNIT 63 - TIP-SOIL DIG UNIT 63 - TIP-SOIL DIG 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 342.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.75 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.37 23Page: Packet Page 99 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 101999 1/31/2008 (Continued)024001 NC MACHINERY CO UNIT 9 - OIL FILTERS, FILTERSSECS0460114 UNIT 9 - OIL FILTERS, FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 122.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.58 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.24 UNIT 9 - ELEMENTS AND FILTERSECS0460115 UNIT 9 - ELEMENTS AND FILTER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 117.59 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.37 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.83 Total :690.73 102000 1/31/2008 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB8902 TODDLER TIME TODDLER TIME #8902 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 354.00 Total :354.00 102001 1/31/2008 067098 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 832127721-039 INV#832127721-039 - EDMONDS PD CELL PHONE CHARGES/DEPT. 001.000.410.521.220.420.00 1,260.00 Total :1,260.00 102002 1/31/2008 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S1964451.001 2091 ELECTRICAL BOX 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 645.18 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 7.46 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 58.09 Total :710.73 24Page: Packet Page 100 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102003 1/31/2008 025140 NORTH PARK HEATING INC 17917 CITY HALL - 12" 90 DEGREE ELBOW CITY HALL - 12" 90 DEGREE ELBOW 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.28 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.54 PS - INSULATION17929 PS - INSULATION 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.60 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.99 Total :55.41 102004 1/31/2008 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0086849 SODIUM BISULFITE SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 1,147.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 102.13 Total :1,249.63 102005 1/31/2008 066628 NORTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO 031742 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES - FUSE, BULBS FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES - FUSE, BULBS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 40.62 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.26 Total :42.88 102006 1/31/2008 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 528 Planning Board Minutes Planning Board Minutes 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 256.00 Total :256.00 102007 1/31/2008 070704 NW AQUATIC & MARINE ED, MEMBERSHIP CHAIRLIDER2008 NAME/NMEA MEMBERSHIP 2008 RENEWAL:~ 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 53.00 Total :53.00 102008 1/31/2008 064240 NWPAC 2008-007 INV#2008-007 - SGT. DON ANDERSON/EDMONDS 25Page: Packet Page 101 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102008 1/31/2008 (Continued)064240 NWPAC ANNUAL DUES/D. ANDERSON~ 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 100.00 Total :100.00 102009 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 034914 Office supplies - paper Office supplies - paper 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 26.09 Office supplies - paper 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 26.08 Office supplies - paper 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 26.07 Toner cartridge - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 90.26 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 2.32 Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 10.35 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 2.32 Total :183.49 102010 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 913337 OFFICE SUPPLIES POST IT FLAGS AND TISSUE 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 10.33 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES967921 SHREDDER, MISC. ENVELOPES 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 117.10 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 10.42 26Page: Packet Page 102 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102010 1/31/2008 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC OFFICE SUPPLIES987948 MARKERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.68 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.50 Total :144.95 102011 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 812743 520437 CALENDAR/POST ITS/CUPS 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 40.34 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 3.59 520437819642 SHREDDER OIL 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 23.99 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 2.14 Total :70.06 102012 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 966010 OFFICE SUPPLY Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 117.36 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 10.45 Total :127.81 102013 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 032799 SEWER - PRINTER INK CTG SEWER - PRINTER INK CTG 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 23.64 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.10 27Page: Packet Page 103 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102013 1/31/2008 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC PW ADMIN - EASYOPEN 1" BINDERS (11X17)601426 PW ADMIN - EASYOPEN 1" BINDERS (11X17) 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 160.98 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 14.32 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES - POST ITS, LASER777989 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES - POST ITS, LASER 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 68.25 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 6.08 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES - BINDERS, LEGAL924388 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES - BINDERS, LEGAL 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 219.58 SEWER - PLANNER 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 56.33 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 19.54 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.01 PW ADMIN - STORAGE BOXES, RUBBERBANDS,963532 PW ADMIN - STORAGE BOXES, RUBBERBANDS, 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 72.39 SEWER - PLANNER 2008 FILLER 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 22.24 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 6.44 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.98 Total :678.88 102014 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 841990 Office Supplies - DSD Office Supplies - DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 572.55 28Page: Packet Page 104 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102014 1/31/2008 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC Office Supplies - DSD856162 Office Supplies - DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 8.07 Total :580.62 102015 1/31/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 047745 ADMIN SUPPLIES Admin office supplies 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 256.35 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 22.82 OPS SUPPLIES996902 Station's office supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 50.75 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 4.52 Total :334.44 102016 1/31/2008 064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO SS06279G208 PW - ELEVATOR MAINT CONTRACT - ~ PW - ELEVATOR MAINT CONTRACT - ~ 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,931.64 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 171.92 Total :2,103.56 102017 1/31/2008 026830 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY 50200565 FAC - PLUMBING SUPPLIES FAC - PLUMBING SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 40.87 Total :40.87 102018 1/31/2008 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 010123908 ADMIN LEASE Admin copier 001.000.510.522.100.450.00 137.06 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.450.00 12.20 Total :149.26 29Page: Packet Page 105 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102019 1/31/2008 070931 PATTON BOGGS LLP Dec 07 024108 Federal lobbyist chgs for Dec 2007 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,000.00 Total :4,000.00 102020 1/31/2008 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS JAN 08 FAC MAINT - CLEANING SUPPLIES -~ FAC MAINT - CLEANING SUPPLIES -~ 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.99 FAC PROJ - POSTAGE - J STEVENS 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 5.53 FAC PROJ - RECORDER - J STEVENS 116.000.651.519.920.310.00 27.21 SR CENTER - POSTAGE - J STEVENS 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 19.78 PW - SLOT GRATE FOR PARKING LOT - ~ 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 29.00 PW - OCT-DEC 07 MILEAGE - S FISHER 411.000.654.537.900.430.00 9.92 WATER - VINEGAR FOR TESTING - ~ 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 19.74 WATER - ICE FOR SHIPPING SAMPLES - ~ 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.80 WATER - WASTEWATER CERT RENWAL - ~ 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 15.00 WATER - WATER WORKS OPER CERT - ~ 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 42.00 SEWER - CELL PHONE CASE FOR CITY CELL 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 16.32 UNIT 76 - LIC FEES 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 25.75 UNIT 647 - (SPLIT) LIC FEES 511.000.657.548.680.490.00 170.25 Total :386.29 102021 1/31/2008 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 164241 INV#164241 - EDMONDS PD 30Page: Packet Page 106 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102021 1/31/2008 (Continued)071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR MAILED WIRELESS MIC~ 001.000.410.521.300.420.00 10.48 Total :10.48 102022 1/31/2008 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0022003-IN ROPE/HOOK ROPE/HOOK 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 215.50 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 8.29 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 18.80 TOOL BAGS/GLASSES0022004-IN TOOL BAGS/GLASSES 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 193.30 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 8.71 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 16.97 Total :461.57 102023 1/31/2008 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 609.33 PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007 PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 368.25 LIFT STATION #71916766007 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.89 PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004 PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 599.12 31Page: Packet Page 107 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102023 1/31/2008 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY Public Works2776365005 Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 48.86 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 185.67 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 185.67 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 185.67 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 185.67 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 185.65 LIFT STATION #132986629000 LIFT STATION #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 82.67 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 398.69 Fire Station # 165322323139 Fire Station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,729.50 SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009 SEWER LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.10 FLEET5903085008 Fleet 7110 210th St SW 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 905.07 PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION6439566008 PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,367.54 ANDERSON CENTER6490327001 ANDERSON CENTER 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,572.47 32Page: Packet Page 108 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102023 1/31/2008 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY LIFT STATION #88851908007 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94 FIRE STATION #209919661109 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 709.09 Total :11,455.85 102024 1/31/2008 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 50723 INV#080201/EDMONDS 95 VW JETA TOWING/95 VW JETA/BLK~ 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 204.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 18.16 Total :222.16 102025 1/31/2008 031194 RED WING SHOES IVC00025783 VOLUNTEER UNIFORMS Assaker boots 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 174.17 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 15.50 Total :189.67 102026 1/31/2008 031600 RELIABLE FLOOR COVERINGS 109450 CITY HALL - 4" LF ROPPE CITY HALL - 4" LF ROPPE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 114.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.15 Total :124.15 102027 1/31/2008 067447 RILEY, CHARLES H.15 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,754.55 Total :1,754.55 102028 1/31/2008 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9414499613 STREET - COLD MIX ASPHALT 33Page: Packet Page 109 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102028 1/31/2008 (Continued)068484 RINKER MATERIALS STREET - COLD MIX ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 507.50 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 43.65 STREET - DUMPED CONCRETE9414499614 STREET - DUMPED CONCRETE 111.000.653.542.310.490.00 55.95 STREET - CLASS C ASPHALT9414507423 STREET - CLASS C ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 192.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 17.09 STREET - CLASS C ASPHALT9414523441 STREET - CLASS C ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 160.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 14.24 STREET - ASPHALT9414538811 STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 350.20 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 31.17 Total :1,371.80 102029 1/31/2008 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 121749 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING Helmet w/goggles 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 125.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 6.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 11.70 Total :143.20 102030 1/31/2008 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 241044 UNIT - 102 - MOTOR ASSMEBLY, ELEMENT 34Page: Packet Page 110 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102030 1/31/2008 (Continued)061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET UNIT - 102 - MOTOR ASSMEBLY, ELEMENT 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 133.11 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.85 Total :144.96 102031 1/31/2008 036070 SHANNON TOWING INC 190726 INV#190726 - TOWING SERVICES/DODGE TOWING/A20978~ 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 136.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 12.10 Total :148.10 102032 1/31/2008 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0073782-IN UNIT 55 - AMBER RESPONDER DOME UNIT 55 - AMBER RESPONDER DOME 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 45.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.50 Total :57.50 102033 1/31/2008 036955 SKY NURSERY 266777 WATER - BARK WATER - BARK 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.97 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.42 Total :17.39 102034 1/31/2008 071502 SLENKER, ROBERT 2449 ROBERT SLENKER ROBERT SLENKER/BOOT ALLOWANCE 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 169.50 Total :169.50 102035 1/31/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2450016544 UTILITY BILLING 18500 82ND AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 104.51 35Page: Packet Page 111 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102035 1/31/2008 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 UTILITY BILLING3570014369 8030 185tTH ST SW 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 284.18 Total :388.69 102036 1/31/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 454009538 958-001-000-8 WWTP POWER 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 34,924.21 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 2,095.45 Total :37,019.66 102037 1/31/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2070015082 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 203.73 SIGNAL LIGHT2330012283 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 33.64 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE2440024129 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 177.44 200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg2480017397 200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 715.99 LIFT STATION #42540012560 LIFT STATION #4 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 648.86 SIGNAL LIGHT2790022228 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 55.86 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR2880027277 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 33.64 36Page: Packet Page 112 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102037 1/31/2008 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 SIGNAL LIGHT3350014902 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 45.29 LIFT STATION #123850011440 LIFT STATION #12 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 394.43 LIFT STATION #154070022027 LIFT STATION #15 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.64 LIFT STATION #114130026596 LIFT STATION #11 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 35.56 SIGNAL LIGHT4210013902 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 59.72 SIGNAL LIGHT4330014129 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 214.81 SIGNAL LIGHT5360023807 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 16.70 Total :2,669.31 102038 1/31/2008 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 37483 INV#37483 - EDMONDS POLICE STAMPS AND INK 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 28.86 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 2.57 Total :31.43 102039 1/31/2008 037075 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE 2007 Voter Reg 2007 Voter Registration File Maint 2007 Voter Registration File Maint 001.000.390.511.800.510.00 56,180.43 Total :56,180.43 37Page: Packet Page 113 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102040 1/31/2008 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4126736-01 WATER - WORK JEANS - D GILBERT WATER - WORK JEANS - D GILBERT 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 170.00 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.240.00 15.13 Total :185.13 102041 1/31/2008 065984 SPRAY CENTER ELECTRONICS INC 189932 UNIT 70 - 1" MANIFOLDS UNIT 70 - 1" MANIFOLDS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 403.15 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.07 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 35.28 Total :445.50 102042 1/31/2008 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1333084 UNIT 485 - ELECT SUPPLIES UNIT 485 - ELECT SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 44.32 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.94 Total :48.26 102043 1/31/2008 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10629255 FLEET- SAFETY GLASSES, DRILL BITS, FLEET- SAFETY GLASSES, DRILL BITS, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 276.11 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.57 FLEET - BIG RIVETER10629256 FLEET - BIG RIVETER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 141.41 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.59 38Page: Packet Page 114 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102043 1/31/2008 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC STREET - BATTERIES, STRAPPING, WASHERS,10629257 STREET - BATTERIES, STRAPPING, WASHERS, 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 511.38 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 45.51 STREET - GREEN UPSIDEDOWN PAINT10629258 STREET - GREEN UPSIDEDOWN PAINT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 357.84 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 31.85 Total :1,401.26 102044 1/31/2008 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 42686 UNIFORMS Ops sweatshirts 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 1,998.00 ALS sweatshirts 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 540.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 177.83 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 48.06 OPS UNIFORMS42688 T-shirts 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 536.25 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 47.73 OPS UNIFORMS42689 Fire mechanic T-shirts 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 102.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.08 39Page: Packet Page 115 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102044 1/31/2008 (Continued)040916 TC SPAN AMERICA ALS UNIFORMS42691 T-shirts 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 50.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 4.45 Total :3,513.40 102045 1/31/2008 071852 TIGER PUBLISHING CO 2008-009 January 2008 Newsletter mailing fees January 2008 Newsletter mailing fees 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 479.39 Sales Tax 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 42.67 Total :522.06 102046 1/31/2008 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 37423 YOST PARK FENCE REPAIR REPAIR SPLIT RAIL FENCING @ YOST PARK 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 122.50 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.480.00 10.90 FISH HATCHERY FENCE REPAIR37439 FISH HATCHERY FENCE REPAIR 125.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,065.00 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.480.00 94.79 LATCHES37492 BUTTERFLY LATCHES/MARINA BEACH 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.49 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.81 Total :1,327.49 102047 1/31/2008 070774 ULINE INC 21712540 INV#21712540 - EDMONDS PD 40Page: Packet Page 116 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102047 1/31/2008 (Continued)070774 ULINE INC #2 HARDWARE BAGS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 14.00 SCRUBS-IN-A-BUCKET 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 84.00 #20 HARDWARE BAGS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 38.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 33.21 Total :169.21 102048 1/31/2008 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA0208102-WA STREET/STORM (2)EMPLOYEES DOTS STREET/STORM (2)EMPLOYEES DOTS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 65.00 STREET/STORM (2)EMPLOYEES DOTS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 65.00 WATER - EMPLOYEE DOT0209750-WA WATER - EMPLOYEE DOT 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 65.00 Total :195.00 102049 1/31/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-8379 MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 14.88 TELEMETRY STATIONS425-712-0417 TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.77 TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.76 41Page: Packet Page 117 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102049 1/31/2008 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES425-712-8251 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 14.16 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 70.80 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 58.06 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 58.06 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 82.13 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM425-775-2455 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 49.29 FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 118.46 Total :523.37 102050 1/31/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-NW4-3726 FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM 001.000.510.528.600.420.00 247.00 Total :247.00 102051 1/31/2008 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0621725104 965420720-00001 PRETREATMENT CELL 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 36.01 Total :36.01 102052 1/31/2008 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 206-660-2168 FAC MAINT CELL - G EVANS FAC MAINT CELL - G EVANS 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 40.29 425-238-8846470091643-00001 cell phone-Tod Moles 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 44.94 42Page: Packet Page 118 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102052 1/31/2008 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 425-238-5456470103273-00001 cell phone-Mike Johnson 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 29.71 425-327-5379670091643-00001 cell phone-unit #77 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 44.92 425-238-8252770096328-00001 cell phone-Dave Sittauer 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 1.04 Total :160.90 102053 1/31/2008 006284 W S DARLEY AND CO PM643803 UNIT 474 - BALL BEARINGS, OIL SEALS, UNIT 474 - BALL BEARINGS, OIL SEALS, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 480.93 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.63 Total :499.56 102054 1/31/2008 045800 WA MUNICIPAL CLERKS ASSOC 2003 CONFERENCE WMCA conference training 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 300.00 Total :300.00 102055 1/31/2008 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 07-712 2008 MEMBERSHIPS 2008 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS FOR BRIAN 001.000.640.574.100.490.00 312.00 2008 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP FOR RICH 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 130.00 Total :442.00 102056 1/31/2008 047605 WA ST TREASURER 2ND QUARTER APRIL - JUNE 2007 - STATE PROCEEDS/EDM 2ND QUARTER 2007/EDMONDS 104.000.000.237.100.000.00 826.59 43Page: Packet Page 119 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102056 1/31/2008 (Continued)047605 WA ST TREASURER JULY-SEPT - STATE PROCEEDS/EDMONDS3RD QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 2007/EDMONDS 104.000.000.237.100.000.00 51.10 OCT-DEC - STATE PROCEEDS/EDMONDS4TH QUARTER 4TH QUARTER 2007~ 104.000.000.237.100.000.00 19.00 Total :896.69 102057 1/31/2008 047605 WA ST TREASURER 2ND QUARTER 2007 APRIL-JUNE - STATE PROCEEDS/EDMONDS 2ND QUARTER 2007/EDMONDS 001.000.000.237.240.000.00 118.19 OCT-DEC - STATE PROCEEDS/EDMONDS4TH QUARTER 2007 4TH QUARTER 2007/EDMONDS 001.000.000.237.240.000.00 54.95 Total :173.14 102058 1/31/2008 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I08030796 INV#I08030796 - EDMONDS BACKGROUND CHECKS/DEC 2007 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 121.25 Total :121.25 102059 1/31/2008 051050 WYATT, ARTHUR D 13 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,122.00 Total :1,122.00 102060 1/31/2008 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 281 JAN 08 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.360.515.230.410.00 6,000.00 Total :6,000.00 102061 1/31/2008 071497 ZURICH NORTH AMERICA M018314239-001-00001 FS 20 STORAGE TANK INSURANCE POLICY # FS 20 STORAGE TANK INSURANCE POLICY # 511.000.657.548.680.460.00 1,143.00 Total :1,143.00 44Page: Packet Page 120 of 415 01/31/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 10:32:02AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount Bank total :197,575.82134 Vouchers for bank code :front 197,575.82Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report134 45Page: Packet Page 121 of 415 AM-1378 2.D. Claim for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Linda Hynd Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Terry A. Stowers (amount undetermined). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute entry. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative A Claim for Damages has been submitted by the following individual: Terry A. Stowers 13543 Greenwood Avenue North, #206 Seattle, WA 98133 (Amount undetermined) Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Stowers Claim for Damages Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/29/2008 09:22 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/29/2008 09:38 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/29/2008 03:59 PM APRV Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 01/28/2008 10:05 AM Final Approval Date: 01/29/2008 Packet Page 122 of 415 Packet Page 123 of 415 Packet Page 124 of 415 AM-1363 2.E. Traffic Impact Fee Annual Report Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Conni Curtis Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Traffic Impact Fee Annual Report. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff None. For Information Only. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Ordinance No. 3516 authorizes the collection of Traffic Impact Fees for roads and became effective September 17, 2004. Pursuant to Section 18.82.080(C) of the Edmonds Community Development Code, Attachment 1 is an accounting of the Traffic Impact Fee Fund activity, including accrued interest in the amount of $5,186.40, for the year ending December 31, 2007. Per Section 18.82.100 of the Code, $92,245.03 will be used to fund the 2007 costs for the 220th Street SW Improvements Project in Fund 112 . The balance will remain in the Traffic Impact Fee fund until further eligible projects are identified. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 2007 Traffic Impact Fees Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 01/24/2008 11:33 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/24/2008 11:44 AM APRV 3 Admin Services Dan Clements 01/24/2008 11:48 AM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:00 AM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/28/2008 11:03 AM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:12 AM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 01/23/2008 08:05 AM Final Approval Date: 01/28/2008 Packet Page 125 of 415 Packet Page 126 of 415 TR A F F I C I M P A C T F E E S Im p a c t F e e R e c e i p t s a n d T r a n s f e r s R e c o r d 2007 Da t e Pe r m i t Nu m b e r Re c e i p t Nu m b e r A p p l i c a n t / S i t e A d d r e s s F e e A m o u n t F u n d N a m e Tr a n s a c t i o n Re f e r e n c e Amount TransferredCumulative Total $0.00 01 / 2 6 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 8 3 9 0 4 3 4 6 0 M i c h a e l D a w s o n 90 1 4 - 2 4 2 n d S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $840.72 01 / 3 1 / 0 7 Ja n u a r y , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $3 . 9 0 $844.62 02 / 0 9 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 4 0 0 4 3 5 9 7 M i k e M a s s e y 94 0 7 - 2 3 2 n d S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $1,685.34 02 / 1 4 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 9 9 5 0 4 3 6 2 3 P a c i f i c E m e r a l d H o m e s , I n c . 80 4 N i n t h A v e n u e S o u t h $8 4 0 . 7 2 $2,526.06 02 / 2 8 / 0 7 Fe b r u a r y , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $1 0 . 5 5 $2,536.61 03 / 0 7 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 0 9 2 0 4 3 7 7 6 C C C o n s t r u c t i o n 84 1 3 - 1 9 2 n d S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $3,377.33 03 / 2 3 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 2 3 2 0 4 3 8 8 8 A nd y D u f f u s 93 2 A l d e r S t r e e t $8 4 0 . 7 2 $4,218.05 03 / 2 7 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 3 9 0 4 3 9 0 3 H a r t f i e l d H o m e s , L L C 23 5 2 1 - 8 8 t h A v e n u e W e s t $8 4 0 . 7 2 $5,058.77 06 - 0 7 9 4 0 4 3 9 1 5 M i c h e l C o n s t r u c t i o n , I n c . 21 2 1 3 - 8 2 n d P l a c e W e s t $2 , 1 1 2 . 4 8 $7,171.25 03 / 2 9 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 7 6 0 4 3 9 5 7 M i k e D a w s o n 97 2 1 - 2 2 7 t h P l a c e S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $8,011.97 07 - 0 0 7 1 0 4 3 9 6 8 S t e e l e H o m e S e r v i c e s 23 6 3 1 E d m o n d s W a y $1 , 3 7 9 . 8 4 $9,391.81 03 / 3 0 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 7 1 0 4 3 9 6 9 B i d C o n s t r u c t i o n , I n c . 78 0 5 - 1 7 3 r d S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $10,232.53 Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p a c t F e e R e c e i p t s a n d F u n d s T r a n s f e r D a t a R e c o r d Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p a c t F e e F u n d A c c o u n t N u m b e r : 1 1 2 . 5 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 3 4 5 . 8 6 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 De c e m b e r 3 1 , 2 0 0 7 TR A N S F E R S RE C E I P T S L: \ P r o d u c t i o n d b \ C C O U N C I L \ 0 0 1 0 _ 1 3 6 3 _ T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e C o u n c i l R e p o r t . X L S 2 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 Council Report Page1 Pa c k e t Pa g e 12 7 of 41 5 TR A F F I C I M P A C T F E E S Im p a c t F e e R e c e i p t s a n d T r a n s f e r s R e c o r d 2007 Da t e Pe r m i t Nu m b e r Re c e i p t Nu m b e r A p p l i c a n t / S i t e A d d r e s s F e e A m o u n t F u n d N a m e Tr a n s a c t i o n Re f e r e n c e Amount TransferredCumulative Total TR A N S F E R S RE C E I P T S 03 / 3 0 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 1 5 9 0 4 3 9 7 6 E n d o n t i c s N o r t h w e s t 21 9 1 1 - 7 6 t h A v e n u e W e s t $4 , 2 4 2 . 0 0 $14,474.53 03 / 3 1 / 0 7 Ma r c h , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $5 0 . 8 5 $14,525.38 04 / 0 3 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 8 7 7 0 4 3 9 9 8 M a r k S c h l i e p s 74 1 5 - 1 7 9 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $15,366.10 04 / 1 3 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 2 7 1 0 4 4 0 7 8 P a c l a b 21 9 1 1 - 7 6 t h A v e n u e W e s t , # 2 0 7 $2 , 3 5 6 . 0 0 $17,722.10 04 / 3 0 / 0 7 A pr i l , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $9 9 . 1 5 $17,821.25 05 / 1 8 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 3 5 5 0 4 4 3 2 6 H e l l e r e n H o m e s , I n c . 87 1 7 - 1 9 2 n d S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $18,661.97 05 / 2 2 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 2 2 3 0 4 4 3 4 2 E a g l e w o o d H o m e s 90 1 C e d a r S t r e e t $8 4 0 . 7 2 $19,502.69 05 / 2 9 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 3 0 2 0 4 4 3 9 3 B e n S u n , D D S 21 9 1 1 - 7 6 t h A v e n u e W e s t $5 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 $24,812.69 05 / 3 1 / 0 7 Ma y , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $1 0 8 . 3 6 $24,921.05 06 / 0 1 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 2 1 9 0 4 4 4 2 8 C l a s s i c o H o m e s 94 1 G l e n S t r e e t $8 4 0 . 7 2 $25,761.77 06 / 0 6 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 0 6 7 0 4 4 4 5 2 R e g a l H o m e s 22 8 0 8 - 9 6 t h P l a c e W e s t 84 0 . 7 2 $26,602.49 06 / 1 3 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 9 1 0 4 4 5 0 1 C a f é d e P a r i s 10 9 M a i n S t r e e t $2 , 5 7 7 . 7 6 $29,180.25 06 / 1 8 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 1 9 5 0 4 4 5 2 6 E d m o n d s P r o f e s s i o n a l C e n t e r 73 1 5 - 2 1 2 t h S t r e e t S W $6 0 , 9 8 5 . 4 5 $90,165.70 06 / 1 9 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 2 4 5 0 4 4 5 5 4 A l e k s e y Z o r c h e n k o 89 1 0 - 1 7 8 t h P l a c e S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $91,006.42 L: \ P r o d u c t i o n d b \ C C O U N C I L \ 0 0 1 0 _ 1 3 6 3 _ T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e C o u n c i l R e p o r t . X L S 2 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 Council Report Page2 Pa c k e t Pa g e 12 8 of 41 5 TR A F F I C I M P A C T F E E S Im p a c t F e e R e c e i p t s a n d T r a n s f e r s R e c o r d 2007 Da t e Pe r m i t Nu m b e r Re c e i p t Nu m b e r A p p l i c a n t / S i t e A d d r e s s F e e A m o u n t F u n d N a m e Tr a n s a c t i o n Re f e r e n c e Amount TransferredCumulative Total TR A N S F E R S RE C E I P T S 06 / 2 5 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 6 5 4 0 4 4 5 8 8 S c o t t & A l i c e O a t e s 74 0 0 - 1 5 8 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $91,847.14 06 / 2 7 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 0 4 8 0 4 4 6 1 1 B a n k o f W a s h i n g t o n 20 2 F i f t h A v e n u e S o u t h $4 , 6 4 1 . 3 3 $96,488.47 06 / 3 0 / 0 7 Ju n e , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d 33 6 . 2 3 $96,824.70 07 / 0 2 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 9 5 5 0 4 4 6 5 1 M i c h e l C o n s t r u c t i o n , I n c . 61 6 G l e n S t r e e t $1 , 0 5 6 . 2 4 $97,880.94 07 - 0 4 4 7 0 4 4 6 5 6 E a g l e w o o d H o m e s 91 5 C e d a r S t r e e t $8 4 0 . 7 2 $98,721.66 07 / 1 6 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 8 4 5 0 4 4 7 3 6 O l d M i l l t o w n 20 1 F i f t h A v e n u e S o u t h $2 7 , 2 8 0 . 4 1 $126,002.07 07 / 2 3 / 0 7 0 6 - 0 9 9 7 0 4 4 7 8 6 V i k i n g P r o p e r t i e s 90 1 1 - 2 4 0 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $126,842.79 07 / 2 4 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 5 0 0 0 4 4 8 0 3 V i k i n g P r o p e r t i e s 10 2 0 6 - 2 4 4 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $127,683.51 07 / 3 0 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 5 0 1 0 4 4 8 5 4 V i k i n g P r o p e r t i e s 10 2 0 4 - 2 4 4 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $128,524.23 07 / 3 1 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 3 1 0 4 4 8 6 3 A l i s a N A , C P A 83 1 9 - 2 3 8 t h S t r e e t S W $7 5 3 . 4 9 $129,277.72 Ju l y , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $7 4 7 . 4 0 $130,025.12 08 / 3 0 / 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 8 4 0 4 5 0 7 6 W a l n u t S t r e e t C o n d o ( D u p l e x ) 30 3 W a l n u t S t r e e t 10 7 . 7 6 $130,132.88 08 / 3 1 / 0 7 Au g u s t , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $4 7 5 . 2 4 $130,608.12 L: \ P r o d u c t i o n d b \ C C O U N C I L \ 0 0 1 0 _ 1 3 6 3 _ T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e C o u n c i l R e p o r t . X L S 2 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 Council Report Page3 Pa c k e t Pa g e 12 9 of 41 5 TR A F F I C I M P A C T F E E S Im p a c t F e e R e c e i p t s a n d T r a n s f e r s R e c o r d 2007 Da t e Pe r m i t Nu m b e r Re c e i p t Nu m b e r A p p l i c a n t / S i t e A d d r e s s F e e A m o u n t F u n d N a m e Tr a n s a c t i o n Re f e r e n c e Amount TransferredCumulative Total TR A N S F E R S RE C E I P T S 09 / 0 4 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 5 2 8 0 4 5 1 1 3 J o h n U b e r u a g a 22 3 1 5 - 9 5 t h P l a c e W e s t 84 0 . 7 2 $131,448.84 09 / 1 0 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 3 8 2 0 4 5 1 4 1 T h e R e i c h l e r O f f i c e B u i l d i n g 21 8 2 7 - 7 6 t h A v e n u e W e s t $ 1 6 , 4 6 2 . 5 1 $147,911.35 09 / 3 0 / 0 7 Se p t e m b e r , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d 20 9 9 . 5 7 $150,010.92 10 / 2 6 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 2 7 6 0 4 5 4 4 2 J a k e s D e v e l o p m e n t 75 1 1 - 1 7 6 t h S t r e e t S W 84 2 . 7 2 $150,853.64 10 / 3 1 / 2 0 0 7 Oc t o b e r , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r s t E a r n e d $7 7 6 . 4 1 $151,630.05 11 / 0 2 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 7 5 8 0 4 5 4 8 4 R e i n h a r d F r e y w a l d 95 0 9 - 2 3 4 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $152,470.77 11 / 0 9 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 2 4 7 0 4 5 5 4 6 F a l c o n R i d g e H o m e s , L L C 80 1 0 - 2 4 0 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $153,311.49 11 / 0 9 / 0 7 0 7 - 0 6 3 5 0 4 5 5 4 7 F a l c o n R i d g e H o m e s , L L C 80 0 4 - 2 4 0 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $154,152.21 11 / 2 7 / 2 0 0 7 0 7 - 0 9 0 2 0 4 5 6 3 7 J e r r y & V i r g i n i a L o w e 97 2 5 - 2 2 7 t h P l a c e S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $154,992.93 11 / 2 9 / 2 0 0 7 0 6 - 1 2 9 8 0 4 5 6 7 2 D a r r y l B e l a n i c h 75 1 0 - 2 1 0 t h S t r e e t S W $1 , 5 9 4 . 8 1 $156,587.74 11 / 3 0 / 2 0 0 7 0 6 - 1 3 0 2 0 4 5 6 8 7 B r i a n a E m e r s o n 72 1 1 M e a d o w d a l e B e a c h R o a d $8 4 0 . 7 2 $157,428.46 06 - 1 3 0 3 0 4 5 6 8 4 J a m e s C u l v e r 72 1 7 - M e a d o w d a l e B e a c h R o a d $8 4 0 . 7 2 $158,269.18 No v e m b e r , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $2 9 1 . 5 5 $158,560.73 12 / 6 / 2 0 0 7 0 7 - 0 8 6 0 0 4 5 7 1 7 L a n d s v e r k Q u a l i t y H o m e s , I n c , 90 0 5 - 1 9 6 t h S t r e e t S W $8 4 0 . 7 2 $159,401.45 L: \ P r o d u c t i o n d b \ C C O U N C I L \ 0 0 1 0 _ 1 3 6 3 _ T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e C o u n c i l R e p o r t . X L S 2 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 Council Report Page4 Pa c k e t Pa g e 13 0 of 41 5 TR A F F I C I M P A C T F E E S Im p a c t F e e R e c e i p t s a n d T r a n s f e r s R e c o r d 2007 Da t e Pe r m i t Nu m b e r Re c e i p t Nu m b e r A p p l i c a n t / S i t e A d d r e s s F e e A m o u n t F u n d N a m e Tr a n s a c t i o n Re f e r e n c e Amount TransferredCumulative Total TR A N S F E R S RE C E I P T S 12 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 0 7 - 0 7 6 7 0 4 5 8 2 3 V i k i n g P r o p e r t i e s 23 5 6 5 - 7 4 t h A v e n u e W e s t $8 4 0 . 7 2 $160,242.17 12 / 3 1 / 2 0 0 7 D e c e m b e r , 2 0 0 7 I n t e r e s t E a r n e d $ 1 8 7 . 1 9 $ 1 6 0 , 4 2 9 . 3 6 $160,429.36 20 0 7 Y E A R - E N D B A L A N C E L: \ P r o d u c t i o n d b \ C C O U N C I L \ 0 0 1 0 _ 1 3 6 3 _ T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e C o u n c i l R e p o r t . X L S 2 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 Council Report Page5 Pa c k e t Pa g e 13 1 of 41 5 AM-1388 2.F. Final Approval of a 17 Lot Townhouse Subdivision (Cooper's Crest) Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Michael Clugston Time:Consent Department:Planning Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Final approval of a 17 lot townhouse subdivision known as COOPER'S CREST located at 8016 - 8024 212th Street SW. (Applicant: Scott Schlumberger of Michel Properties, Inc.) Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the draft ordinance (Exhibit 5) authorizing the Mayor to sign the final subdivision documents in preparation for recording of the Plat with Snohomish County. Previous Council Action The Council has not acted on this proposal before. After holding a public hearing on September 6, 2007, the Hearing Examiner issued a written decision approving the 17-lot townhouse subdivision. Narrative The formal plat before the Council in this application is not a typical formal plat. Because the project is located in a multi-family zone, the City actually considers the 17-unit development a multi-family project. However, the Edmonds Community Development Code specifically provides for what is called a 'townhouse subdivision' to allow alternative forms of ownership upon completion. A townhouse subdivision allows a multi-family project to be divided into fee-simple lots with lot lines that may run between common walls of units. The entire project is reviewed and must comply with the zoning standards of the RM zone. However, because of its unique ownership configuration, certain bulk standards that are applied to the entire project (e.g. setbacks and lot coverage) are not applied to individual lots. The townhouse subdivision tool is essentially an alternative to the creation of a condominium to sell the individual lots. In this case, the proposed project was a consolidated design review application for a 17-unit multifamily development and a townhouse subdivision. Because the project already received design approval from the ADB, the only issue before the Council is the approval of the map for the townhouse subdivision. Both the Engineering and Planning Divisions have reviewed the final plat application for compliance with the Hearing Examiner's approval of the preliminary plat and find that the conditions have been met or have been bonded for ensuring compliance. Fiscal Impact Packet Page 132 of 415 Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Vicinity and Zoning Map Link: Exhibit 2 - Final Plat Documents Link: Exhibit 3 - Homeowners Association and CCRs Link: Exhibit 4 - Hearing Examiners Decision Link: Exhibit 5 - Draft Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 03:20 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/31/2008 03:25 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 03:27 PM APRV Form Started By: Michael Clugston Started On: 01/30/2008 02:15 PM Final Approval Date: 01/31/2008 Packet Page 133 of 415 PRD-1978-1 PRD-1990-1 P RS-8 RS-8 RM-2.4 RM-2.4 RM-2.4 Edmonds Woodway High School Chase Lake Elementary 212TH ST SW 7 7 T H 8 3 R D A V E W 8 2 N D P L W W 8 2 N D A V E W 211TH PL 8 0 T H 2 0 9 T H S T S W 210TH P L S W 80 T H P L W A V E W 8 0 T H P L W 211TH PL 7 8 T H A V E W 209TH ST SW 213TH ST SW 78 TH A V E W T A V E W 8 2 N D P L W A V E W 215TH ST SW 8 1 S T P L W 215TH PL SW 8 3 R D P L 214TH PL SW 216TH ST SW ± 0 570285 Feet Zoning Vicinity Map File P-2007-50 RS-20 RS-12 RS-10 RS-8 RS-6 RSW-12 RS-MP RM-3 RM-2.4 RM-1.5 BP !!! ! ! !BN BC CG CG2 CW MP1 MP2 MU !P OS ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Rezones PRD Subject Property: 8016 - 8024 212th Street SW Attachment 1Packet Page 134 of 415 Packet Page 135 of 415 Packet Page 136 of 415 Packet Page 137 of 415 Packet Page 138 of 415 Packet Page 139 of 415 Packet Page 140 of 415 Packet Page 141 of 415 Packet Page 142 of 415 Packet Page 143 of 415 Packet Page 144 of 415 Packet Page 145 of 415 Packet Page 146 of 415 Packet Page 147 of 415 Packet Page 148 of 415 Packet Page 149 of 415 Packet Page 150 of 415 Packet Page 151 of 415 Packet Page 152 of 415 Packet Page 153 of 415 Packet Page 154 of 415 Packet Page 155 of 415 Packet Page 156 of 415 Packet Page 157 of 415 Packet Page 158 of 415 Packet Page 159 of 415 Packet Page 160 of 415 Packet Page 161 of 415 Packet Page 162 of 415 Packet Page 163 of 415 {BFP685833.DOC;1/00006.900150/} ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF COOPER’S CREST, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8016 – 8024 212TH AVENUE SW, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City approved the preliminary plat commonly known as Cooper’s Crest on September 20, 2007, and WHEREAS, the Council concludes that applicant has met all conditions of the final plat approval, including applicable requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code and Chapter 58.17 RCW, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approved. A 17-lot final townhouse subdivision plat known as Cooper’s Crest located at 8016 – 8024 212th Avenue SW, Edmonds, Washington, is hereby finally approved. The subject site is legally described on the attached Exhibit A, incorporated as fully as if herein set forth. The site is zoned multi-family residential (RM-2.4) and such approval is given in accordance with the Hearing Examiner’s recommendation, incorporated by this reference as fully as herein set forth and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the City Council. The City Council further finds that the subdivision is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinances and land use controls. The applicant is Scott Schlumberger on behalf of Michel Construction, Inc., and the application filed in File No. P-2007-50. Packet Page 164 of 415 {BFP685833.DOC;1/00006.900150/} Section 2. Recording. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to record, at the expense of the applicant, said Plat approvals, in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Edmonds and Chapter 58.17 RCW. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 165 of 415 {BFP685833.DOC;1/00006.900150/} SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF COOPER’S CREST, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8016 – 8024 212TH AVENUE SW, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________,2008. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 166 of 415 {BFP685833.DOC;1/00006.900150/} Exhibit A Subject to Easements, Restrictions and Reservations of Record, Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. Vicinity Map: Packet Page 167 of 415 AM-1385 2.G. Approval of Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Union Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Tom Tomberg Time:Consent Department:Fire Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Approval of Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Union Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve. Previous Council Action Collective bargaining with IAFF Union Local 1828 was the subject of Council Executive sessions on November 20, 2007 and January 22, 2008. Narrative The City and IAFF Union Local 1828 have been negotiating a collective labor agreement since June. City representatives met with Council in executive session on November 20 and January 22. The parties have tentatively agreed on wages, hours, and working conditions that fall within Council financial parameters, the total cost of compensation model, and aligns the bargaining unit with comparable jurisdictions that provide fire and life safety services. The Fire Union approved the tentative agreement on January 29. Council approval will finalize the agreement with a term of January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. Attached to this memo are two versions of the new agreement: the mark-up version shows deleted language as a strikethrough and the new language in red; the second version is a clean copy showing only new and continuing language. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 2008 Bargaining Link: 2008 Bargaining, Mark-Up Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/30/2008 12:02 PM APRV Packet Page 168 of 415 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/30/2008 02:47 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/30/2008 03:33 PM APRV Form Started By: Tom Tomberg Started On: 01/30/2008 09:48 AM Final Approval Date: 01/30/2008 Packet Page 169 of 415 AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDMONDS and LOCAL 1828, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS effective January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010 PREAMBLE This Agreement is entered into by the City of Edmonds (Employer) and Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters (Union). The purpose of this Agreement is to achieve and maintain harmonious relations between the Employer and the Union, to provide for equitable and peaceful adjustment of differences that may arise, and to establish proper standards of wages, hours, and other employment conditions. ARTICLE Page ARTICLE Page 1. Recognition 2 21. Savings Clause 18 2. Union Security 2 22. Picket Line 18 3. Payroll Deduction 2 23. Supervisory Duties 18 4. Discrimination 3 24. Strikes 18 5. Union Business 3 25. Maintenance of Benefits 18 6. Union Bulletin Boards 3 26. Management Rights 18 7. Meetings 3 27. Fair Labor Standards Acts 19 8. Working Rules 4 28. Safety Committee 19 9. Wages 4 29. Seniority 19 10. Hours 4 30. Assignment During 11. Vacations 7 Temporary Disability 19 12. Overtime Pay 8 31. Successors and Assigns 20 13. Insurance 9 32. Emergency Medical 14. Holidays 10 Technician and Emergency 15. Clothing Allowance 12 Medical Technician, 16. Mileage Allowance 12 Paramedic 20 17. Working Out of Class 12 33. Labor Management 18. Sick Leave 13 Committee 21 19. Layoff and Recall 15 34. Drivers License Checks 21 20. Grievance Procedure 17 35. Hazardous Materials and Technical Rescue Teams 22 36. Term of Agreement 24 Appendix “A” — Wages 25 Appendix “B” — Health and Wellness Program 29 Exhibit 1 - Medical Fitness Profile 30 Exhibit 2 - Medical Fitness Profile Test Schedule 31 Addendum - Drug Testing 32 U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 1 Packet Page 170 of 415 Article 1 RECOGNITION The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative for all uniformed employees of the Fire Department except the Fire Chief, Assistant Chief, Fire Marshal, and Training and Safety Chief. Article 2 UNION SECURITY It shall be a condition of employment that all employees of the Employer covered by this Agreement who are members of the Union in good standing on the effective date of the Agreement shall remain members in good standing and those who are not members on the effective date of this Agreement, shall, on the 31st day following the effective date of this Agreement, become and remain members in good standing in the Union. It shall also be a condition of employment that all employees covered by this Agreement hired on or after its effective date shall, on the 31st day following the beginning of such employment, become and remain members in good standing in the Union. Upon confirmation of employment, the Union President, or his/her designee, will give the new employee a new member orientation that outlines the current collective labor agreement between the Union and the Employer. During that orientation the new member will be made aware of the provisions of this article, asked if the employee has any objections to being a new member of IAFF Union Local 1828 meeting RCW 41.56.122, and describe the agency fee option. A written confirmation of the member’s status will be forwarded to the Fire Chief following the orientation. If an employee: A. For bonafide religious tenets as per RCW 41.56.122(1), does not desire to be a member of the Union, one of the following shall apply: 1. Pay a service charge each month equivalent to regular Union dues to the Union, or 2. Pay an amount of money each month equivalent to regular current Union dues to the Union who shall then transmit that amount to a non-religious charity that is agreeable to the Union and the Employer. B. Written authorization is necessary for the payroll deduction of Union dues or alternative payments as set forth in sub-paragraphs 1 and 2 above. Article 3 PAYROLL DEDUCTION The Employer agrees to deduct, once each month, dues from the pay of those employees covered by this Agreement. The total amount of deductions shall be remitted by the Employer to the Treasurer of the Union. This authorization shall remain in force during the term of this Agreement. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 2 Packet Page 171 of 415 The employer further agrees to deduct contributions from the pay of those employees who have voluntarily signed an authorized payroll deduction form for the purpose of the Union’s post-retirement medical fund and/or its political action fund. The deductions shall remain in effect until the employee voluntarily withdraws the authorization in writing. The Union shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the City on account of the payroll deduction authorization. Article 4 DISCRIMINATION The Employer agrees not to unlawfully discriminate against any employee for his/her activity on behalf of, or membership in, the Union. The Employer and the Union agree that there shall be no unlawful discrimination against any employee because of race, creed, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender expression, or identity, age, religion, natural origin, marital status, or physical, sensory, or mental disability. Complaints of discrimination under this section shall be subject to the grievance procedure. However, if the Employer and the Union have not reached agreement at the conclusion of the Mayor's consideration of the grievance, the matter may then be submitted to the appropriate governmental agency or civil action and will not be an arbitratable matter. The employee and Union shall not be entitled to proceed with a grievance procedure, or receive the benefits of any grievance settlement or award, if either the employee or Union pursues an administrative or civil action based on substantially the same allegations as contained in the grievance. The Employer and the Union agree to cooperate in providing reasonable accommodation for qualified disabled persons. Article 5 UNION BUSINESS Employees elected to local, state or international Union office may be granted reasonable time to perform their Union functions, including conventions and conferences, without loss of pay. With approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee, Union officers are collectively allowed up to 120 hours off duty annually to conduct Union business. Time off for Union activities will not cause the Employer additional money if at all possible. Article 6 UNION BULLETIN BOARDS The Employer agrees to permit suitable bulletin boards in convenient places in each station and work area to be used by the Union. The Union shall limit its posting of notices and bulletins to such bulletin boards. Article 7 MEETINGS Meeting rooms at any of the fire stations or City building facilities may be used for Union meetings. The meetings will be scheduled by the Union Executive Board. All on duty U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 3 Packet Page 172 of 415 employees may attend any Union meetings unless there is a scheduled conflict. The scheduling for the use of the meeting rooms will be coordinated by the Union and the Fire Chief and/or his/her designee. Article 8 WORKING RULES The Fire Department may adopt rules, regulations, policies, and procedures for the Department’s operation and the conduct of its employees provided such do not conflict with any of the provisions of this Agreement. Article 9 WAGES The classification of positions covered by this Agreement and the corresponding rates of pay shall be as set forth in Appendix A, which is attached hereto and part of this Agreement. Article 10 HOURS A. Work Period 1. Day Shift Personnel The work period for day workers of eight hours a day shall normally consist of five shifts equal to 40 hours, each shift normally starting at 0800 and ending at 1700 hours, Monday through Friday. Other day shift work schedules may be worked subject to mutual agreement between the Employer and the Union. In a 4-10 work schedule, assigned day personnel work from 0630 hours to 1730 hours with an hour off for lunch that is taken at an unspecified time during the day. 2. Shift Personnel The work period for shift personnel shall be 24 hours. The average work week for shift workers may consist of two shifts per week, equal to 48 hours, each shift normally starting at 0800 and ending at 0800 the following day. If an employee has his/her schedule changed from shift work to day work (a 48- hour work week to a 40-hour work week), or from day work to shift work (a 40- hour work week to a 48-hour work week), the following formula will be used to convert all accumulated benefit hours (vacation, sick leave, holiday): ~ when transferring from a 48-hour week to a 40-hour week, all accumulated benefit hours will be multiplied by .834; ~ when transferring from a 40-hour week to a 48-hour week, all accumulated benefit hours will be multiplied by 1.2. Personnel assigned to a Special Detail by the Fire Chief may be assigned to a Day Shift work schedule if the special detail exceeds two weeks in duration. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 4 Packet Page 173 of 415 B. Kelly Day In accordance with Section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, a 21-day work period is established for shift employees. The 21-day work period shall consist of recurring cycles of one shift on duty and two shifts off duty with each seventh scheduled shift being an additional shift off known as a "Kelly day.” The "Kelly day" shall be taken in order to reduce the annual average number of hours worked to the level provided for by this Agreement. 1. Individual Kelly days are selected in such a manner to ensure that two Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift. C. Shift Exchanges Shift exchanges are considered a privilege that must not be abused and trades must be conducted in a reasonable manner. Members may exchange shifts with prior approval of the Fire Chief and/or his/her designee in accordance with the following guidelines. 1. All trades of over four hours must be approved by the affected Officers. Members are allowed no more than four trades greater than 12 hours each month without permission of a Chief Officer. 2. Trades may be approved as long as there are qualified personnel to fill out shift positions. “Acting Out-of-Classification" positions that are created by trades shall be paid in accordance with the Acting Out-of-Classification Section of this Contract. 3. If at all possible, exchanges will not cost the Employer additional money. Whenever multiple officers are scheduled at a station, the exchanging officer will be sent to a station that is absent a shift officer and no acting out-of-class pay will be paid at that station. 4. Firefighter/Paramedics shall arrange their shift exchanges in such a manner that the exchange does not cause an overtime and two Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift. 5. Battalion Chiefs shall arrange their shift exchanges in such a manner that the exchange does not cause an overtime and the Battalion Chief function is covered on that shift by another Battalion Chief or an employee qualified to act out of class in the Battalion Chief position. 6. Probationary employees within the first 12 months of employment will be allowed to trade only in cases of emergency and with permission of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. 7. Purpose or reason for trade shall be a personal matter and shall not be cause for denial of trade requests. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 5 Packet Page 174 of 415 D. Training Employees assigned to attend the State Fire Academy or similar training, either as a recruit or as an instructor, for more than two weeks will receive the following: 1. Option to stay, at Employer expense, at the Academy or lodge at a mutually acceptable site at or near the Academy. 2. Mileage allowance as per Employer policy for one round trip per week to and from the Academy including the graduation ceremony. 3. Food service as provided by the Academy. 4. Compensation at the overtime rate for off-duty students and instructors who participate at approved training. Members enrolled in the Everett Community College Fire Academy, Bates Technical College Fire Academy Program at North Bend, or a similar part-time or full-time academy off duty will be paid at the overtime rate as required. Attendance on scheduled duty days may include return to duty when class is concluded. 5. Time off as per Union contract. 6. Required clothing and equipment as identified by the Fire Academy. E. Minimum Staffing The Employer and the Union agree to maintain 12 employees on duty at the regular hourly rate of pay to staff the three stations at all times, at least two of whom are Firefighter/Paramedics. In the event of proposed layoffs of Union positions as described by Article 19 of this agreement, the Union agrees to bargain the impact of the provision with the Employer during the life of the agreement. Employees will be allowed time off, in addition to the scheduled Kelly days, for vacation and holidays provided they do not exceed a maximum of four employees off per shift. Any sick leave, disability leave, military leave, training or other leave granted under the terms of the Agreement will not interrupt scheduled vacation or holiday time off. Callbacks as needed to maintain the minimum staffing will be compensated at the overtime rate. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 6 Packet Page 175 of 415 Article 11 VACATIONS Each employee covered by this Agreement shall accrue the following number of paid vacation hours beginning with: HOURS Accrued Time Shift Personnel Non-shift Personnel Months six through eleven 48 40 Years one through four 120 80 Years five through nine 168 120 Years ten through fourteen 216 160 Years fifteen through nineteen 264 176 Years twenty through twenty-four 288 200 Year twenty-five and beyond 288 216 At no time may more than four employees be off for vacation, holiday, sick leave incentive, or Kelly day without approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. Employees shall schedule vacation time annually. Vacation requests are subject to the approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. Vacation leave is administered per SOP 501.10. Accrued vacation hours may be carried over to subsequent years; maximum allowable accrual is two years worth of earned vacation hours. Upon attainment of the maximum vacation accrual, vacation accrual shall cease until such a time as the leave balance drops below the maximum. Employees are responsible for managing their vacation time within Department scheduling procedures that are affected by any City sick leave incentive program that results in an award of additional vacation time. The City shall not incur overtime expense to cover for employees who face a use- it-or- lose-it vacation time scenario caused by their failure to manage, schedule, and/or take vacation through the vacation scheduling process. For purposes of vacation scheduling, Firefighter/Paramedics shall schedule in such a manner that two qualified Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift once each shift has four Firefighter/Paramedics assigned. In the interim, two Firefighter/Paramedics shall be on duty 24 hours every shift except when one Firefighter/Paramedic has a scheduled Kelly day. In this scenario, one additional Firefighter/Paramedic, for a total of two, may be off, provided that the position is available for vacation as described in SOP 501.10. Employees who are dismissed or resign with less than 12 months of service shall not receive pay for any accumulated, unused vacation hours. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 7 Packet Page 176 of 415 Article 12 OVERTIME PAY Shift personnel shall be paid one-and-one-half times (1.5) their regular hourly rate based on 48-hour work week as specified in Appendix A for all authorized hours worked in excess of their regularly scheduled work week. The regular monthly salary includes base salary, longevity/educational pay, and hazardous materials/technical rescue pay. The formula for determining the hourly rate for shift personnel is regular monthly salary times 12 months divided by 2,496 hours. The formula for determining the hourly rate for day shift personnel is regular monthly salary times 12 months divided by 2,080 hours. Day personnel shall be paid one-and-one-half times (1.5) their regular hourly rate based on 40-hour work week for all authorized hours worked in excess of their regularly scheduled work week. Employees who are called back to work from off-duty shall receive overtime pay for the minimum time as specified below: A. Mandatory Work All employees covered by the terms of this Agreement who are called back to work from off-duty shall be paid at least three hours minimum. B. Pager Calls When responding voluntarily to pager calls employees shall be paid a one hour minimum pursuant to Fire Department guidelines. C. Drills Voluntary drills will be paid at a minimum one hour where attendance is pursuant to Fire Department guidelines. D. Hold-Over Any call extending longer than 15 minutes beyond duty time shall be paid at a minimum of one hour. E. Battalion Chief/Officer Meetings Off duty Battalion Chiefs and Officers who attend mandatory staff meetings shall be paid a minimum of two hours of pay per meeting. F. Court Pay An employee subpoenaed to testify in his/her official capacity while off duty shall be paid a minimum of one hour. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 8 Packet Page 177 of 415 G. Compensatory Time There shall be no compensatory time off. H. All-Personnel Meetings There will be at least one Department personnel meeting per year. These meetings will be mandatory except for absences due to conflict from scheduled and emergency leaves, i.e., vacations, sick leave, and education. Off duty employees shall be paid a one hour minimum but will not be subject to the minimum call-back hours as in Section A. I. Department Safety Committee Meetings Off-duty Safety Committee Members who attend mandatory Fire Department Safety Meetings will be paid at a minimum one hour. Safety Committee meetings, which will not normally exceed one per calendar quarter, may be scheduled at a time when one of the Union Safety members is on duty. J. Firefighter/Paramedic Run Review On and off-duty attendance by Firefighter/Paramedics at run review is mandatory without an excused absence from the Fire Chief or his/her designee. Off-duty Firefighter/Paramedics attending run review shall be paid at a minimum of one-hour. Article 13 INSURANCE A. LEOFF The Employer shall pay those costs necessary to provide employees adequate coverage to meet the requirements of the Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters Act as presently revised under State Law for various employees. In the event the Washington Department of Retirement Services or a court of competent jurisdiction determines after the exhaustion of all applicable appeals that an employee previously employed by Medic Seven at the time of integration is ineligible for LEOFF II membership, the Employer has no obligation to compensate the employee for the difference between the LEOFF II and any PERS retirement system, and the employee will belong to that retirement system to which they are entitled to belong under State law. B. Coverage Provided The Employer shall make available to eligible regular full-time employees and their eligible spouses and dependents, an insurance program that includes medical, dental, and vision insurance, and an employee assistance plan (EAP) benefit. For purposes of this article “spouse” shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 9 Packet Page 178 of 415 in a domestic partnership which has been registered with the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. This insurance program includes the following: 1. Medical Insurance. Employees may choose between the following medical plans: Association of Washington Cities (“AWC”) Plan A or AWC Group Health Cooperative Co-pay Plan 1. 2. Dental Insurance. Dental insurance is provided through the AWC Washington Dental Service Plan F with Option III (orthodontia). 3. Vision Insurance. Vision insurance is provided through the AWC Vision Service Plan ($10.00 deductible). 4. EAP Benefit. The Employee Assistance Program is provided through AWC. C. Payment of Premiums For all eligible regular full-time employees, the Employer will pay 100 percent of the aggregate premium costs of the benefits specified in Section B. For eligible spouses and dependents, the Employer will pay 90 percent of the aggregate premium costs of the benefits specified in Section B. D. Changes to Health Insurance Plans 1. In the event that AWC adopts benefit changes to the health insurance plans specified in this Article during the term of this Agreement, such changes will be automatically incorporated into this Agreement. If the changes reduce the benefit or requires an additional contribution by the employee, the employer agrees to bargain both the decision and the impact of the change. 2. The Employer may change health insurance plans during the term of the Agreement provided that any replacement plan provides substantially equal or better benefits. E. Life Insurance The Employer will provide a life insurance benefit to eligible employees in accord with its Personnel Policies. Article 14 HOLIDAYS A. Designation of Holidays The following days shall be considered Holidays: New Year's Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, day immediately after Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Each employee shall receive a "floater" holiday in lieu of Lincoln's Birthday U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 10 Packet Page 179 of 415 holiday. The floater may be taken at a time designated by the employee and approved by the supervisor. If the employee chooses and/or is required to work on the designated floater day it will be treated the same as working any other holiday. B. Day Personnel All day employees shall be paid for all such holidays regardless upon which day in the week the holiday should fall. If any work is performed by such an employee on such holiday additional compensation at the overtime rate shall be paid not to exceed eight hours. No employee shall be called to work on such a holiday for less than a minimum call-out time and rate. For day workers, whenever any of the aforementioned holidays falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be the holiday, and when any of the aforementioned holidays falls upon a Sunday, the Monday following shall be considered the holiday. For day workers if a holiday occurs during an employee's vacation, he/she shall receive the holiday time off at a later date. Day personnel working a 4/10 schedule will use eight hours of holiday time and two hours of vacation time to equal the ten hours off on holidays. In lieu of using eight hours of holiday time and two vacation hours on designated City holidays and the floater, the assigned Inspector may use ten vacation hours (assuming a 4-10 schedule) for each holiday and the floater. In November- December of the calendar year, the assigned Inspector may sell back unused holiday hours. C. Shift Personnel All shift employees shall be awarded 120 hours of pay each year in lieu of holidays received by other City employees. This compensation may be paid on an annual basis in November or on the first pay day in December. Employees may also take paid time off in lieu of this pay at a time mutually agreeable to both the employee and the Fire Chief. The holiday time bank is available for use in January; however, actual holiday time is earned at a rate of 10 hours per month, and is prorated based on months of service for new employees. Employees who terminate employment during the year shall receive prorated pay for the holiday time unless the time was taken in lieu of pay, and, if the employee used more holiday time than was earned, an adjustment is made to the final payout received by the employee reflecting that use. For purposes of scheduling holiday time, Firefighter/Paramedics shall schedule in such a manner that two qualified Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift once each shift has four Firefighter/Paramedics assigned. In the interim, two Firefighter/Paramedics shall be on duty 24 hours every shift except when one Firefighter/Paramedic has a scheduled Kelly day. In this scenario, one U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 11 Packet Page 180 of 415 additional Firefighter/Paramedic, for a total of two, may be off, provided that the position is available for holiday as described in SOP 501.10. Article 15 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE A. Protective Clothing All protective clothing or protective devices required of employees in the performance of their duties shall be furnished to the employees by the Employer. B. Uniforms All uniform replacement, upkeep, cleaning, and pressing shall be provided by the Employer as per Department policy. C. Probationary Shift Employees Probationary shift employees shall be furnished five complete uniforms and all other clothing as required in the Fire Department policy and procedures as soon as reasonably possible after hiring date. Article 16 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Employees required by their supervisor to use their private automobile for Fire Department business shall be compensated at the maximum rate allowed any other City department personnel. Article 17 WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION An employee who is required to accept responsibilities and carry out the duties of a position or rank above which he/she normally holds shall be paid at eight percent above his/her normal rate of pay. A. Working Out of Class Guidelines 1. Five years with the Edmonds Fire Department. 2. To serve as an Acting Company Officer the employee has been grand- fathered to act out of class as a Company Officer as of October 20, 2003 or has successfully completed the requirements in SOP 301.02 Acting Company Officer Program. Employees may begin the program after completing four years of employment with the Edmonds Fire Department. 3. Acting pay will be paid on a pro-rated hourly rate for hours worked in excess of five hours in the upgraded position. If it exceeds five hours, all hours will be paid retroactive to the first hour. 4. Acting Battalion Chiefs must be a current Company Officer with the Edmonds Fire Department. To serve as an Acting Battalion Chief the employee has U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 12 Packet Page 181 of 415 been grand-fathered to act out of class as a Battalion Chief as of February 25, 2004 or has successfully completed the requirements in SOP 301.03 Acting Battalion Chief Program. Company Officers may begin the program after completing one year as a Company Officer with the Edmonds Fire Department. B. Firefighter/Paramedic Field Training Officer (FTO) Assignment 1. The City and the Union agree that the Firefighter/Paramedic Field Training Officer position does not constitute a class as defined by the Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations. The FTO appears in this article because even though not a class, the parties identify it as an appropriate location in the agreement to address this assignment. 2. In order to be eligible to serve as a FTO the employee has: a. Completed three years of service with the Edmonds Fire Department as a Firefighter/Paramedic. b. Received prior approval to serve as a FTO from the Edmonds Fire Department Medical Program Director, Medical Services Administrator, and Fire Chief or his/her designee. 3. Compensation for performing the FTO assignment is five percent above his/her normal rate of pay on a per diem basis. 4. The parties recognize that on certain shifts there may be no FTO assignment due to lack of eligibility. Article 18 SICK LEAVE A. LEOFF II Employees Shift employees shall receive sick leave accruals at the rate of 16 hours for each full calendar month of continuous service. The maximum accumulation of sick leave shall be 49 shifts for shift personnel. Day personnel shall accrue sick leave at the rate of eight hours per month up to a maximum accumulation of 1,000 hours. Sick leave accrued but not used up to a maximum of 960 hours shall be payable to the employee based on the following percentages of the employee’s regular pay rate in effect as of his/her honorable termination or death, except duty- related death or disability, which will be paid at 100 percent of the employee’s actual accrual total up to 49 shifts. Percent Resignation with two weeks notice 25 Termination by layoff 25 Termination for retirement/death 50 U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 13 Packet Page 182 of 415 New employees when hired will be given a sick leave bank of 384 hours. This paid leave may not be used for a Family Medical Leave unless approved by the employer. This bank will not grow until the employee has completed his/her second year of employment. After the second year, new employees will begin to accumulate sick leave at the regular accrual rate of sixteen 16 hours per month as stated above. New employees that leave before two years of service receive 25 percent of the unused sick time based on an accrual of 16 hours per month. In the event of the death of an employee, payment for all unused sick leave shall be made to the spouse or the employee’s estate. For purposes of this article “spouse” shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is in a domestic partnership which has been registered with the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. Retirement, in addition to its usual meaning, shall include those employees with 20 or more years of service credit within the LEOFF system who choose to end their employment with the Employer on a voluntary, honorable basis even though the employee has not yet attained LEOFF II retirement age. B. Use of Sick Leave Accrued sick leave may be used for: 1. The employee’s own illness, injury or disability including disability due to pregnancy or childbirth. 2. The need to care for a child under 18 years of age, or an older child incapable of self-care, with a health condition requiring treatment or supervision. Employees shall return to duty on a scheduled work day as soon as a qualified person is able to assume caregiver responsibilities or the child is capable of self-care. 3. The need to care for the employee’s spouse, parent, parent-in-law, or grandparent with a serious health condition or emergency condition. 4. Medical or dental appointments for the employee or a dependent child, provided that the employee receives the advance approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee; and further provided the employee must make reasonable efforts to schedule such appointments at times when they will not interfere with scheduled work days. Employees receiving advance approval to use sick leave for a medical or dental appointment for a dependent child shall return to duty on a scheduled work day as soon as the appointment is concluded and the dependent child is in the care of a qualified caregiver or the child is capable of self-care. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 14 Packet Page 183 of 415 5. Bereavement Leave In the event of a death in the employee’s immediate family, to include spouse, children, step children, mother, father, brother, sister, grandparents, grandchildren, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, and step relations the Fire Chief or his/her designee shall upon request grant the employee bereavement leave with pay. The maximum bereavement leave shall be 48 hours or two shifts for shift employees; provided however, in the event of unusual circumstances or if travel is involved to attend the funeral, additional time off may be granted. Additional time not to exceed 24 hours or one shift may be deducted from the employee’s sick leave account. Day personnel shall receive three work days bereavement leave with an additional three days charged to sick leave as stated above. 6. Family Medical Leave Eligible employees are entitled to the full benefit and protection of the State and Federal Family Medical Leave and Pregnancy Disability laws. The certificate of a physician and/or written report concerning the need for the duty sick leave may be required by the Employer in order to qualify for duty sick leave with pay that is signed by the physician that treated the illness and authorized the time off, and that states the nature of the condition, duration of the period that the employee will be incapacitated, and the date the employee can return to work. C. Worker's Compensation Offset If an employee is entitled to Worker's Compensation benefits and is simultaneously on sick leave, the employee shall apply for Worker's Compensation and turn over all compensation received to the Employer so that the combination of sick leave and other benefits available will permit the employee to retain his/her normal pay. D. Sick Leave Incentive Each successive year of this Agreement each employee who qualifies for a Sick Leave Incentive during the previous calendar year shall receive additional vacation hours to be taken in the following year as specified below: ~ 24 hours vacation time if 0 through 24 hours of sick leave are used, ~ 12 hours vacation time if 25 through 48 hours of sick leave are used. Day personnel shall receive sick leave incentive as vacation hours based on the shift personnel conversion formula in Article 10 - A1 as it applies above. This sick leave incentive plan excludes sick leave used for on-the-job injuries covered by Labor and Industries. Article 19 LAYOFF AND RECALL The Employer may conduct a layoff, also known as a personnel reduction or a reduction in force, because of a shortage of funds, lack of work, or material reorganization of the U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 15 Packet Page 184 of 415 Fire Department. And, a layoff may cause a reduction in rank for employees that remain with the Department. Conversely, a recall of laid off employees, within the time duration and conditions described below, provide an opportunity for laid off employees to return to work, and employees reduced in rank to assume their former rank. Provided, however, that should the Employer at any time determine that based upon shortage of funds, lack of work, or material reorganization of the Fire Department a layoff or reduction in force may be required, the Employer shall provide as much advance notice as possible to the Union in order to allow the Union to bargain both the decision to layoff or reduce the number of personnel and the impact of such decision upon the Union and all bargaining unit employees except those serving in an assigned position. A. Layoff – In the event of a reduction in force, the Employer shall give notice at least two weeks in advance to any employee before layoff. Employee(s) with the least Department seniority shall be laid off first. Should the reduction in force necessitate any reduction in rank for remaining personnel, the last Officer(s) promoted in the rank(s) affected shall be the first to be reduced. Reduction in rank will be based on the time in grade (classification). B. Recall – In the event of a recall, the last employee laid off shall be the first employee recalled. No new employee shall be hired until all laid off employees have been given an opportunity to return to work. This obligation shall expire 24 months after such layoff, or after such time as the Employer is unable to contact the employee being recalled on each of 10 consecutive business days, whichever occurs first. Recall to employment shall, at the discretion of the Employer, be subject to the recalled employee successfully passing a medical, psychological, and physical examinations. Such examinations shall be scheduled by and at the expense of the Employer. The recalled employee shall not be compensated for any examinations that are conducted prior to re-employment. C. If the recalled employee passes the examinations required by the Employer, the recalled employee shall be allowed to give a maximum of two weeks notice to their current employer before reporting for duty. The employee on layoff status is responsible for keeping the Employer notified of the address, telephone number, and hours at which he/she can be contacted. Prior to attempting to contact an employee to be recalled, the Employer shall notify the Union. D. Employees recalled from layoff status shall be returned in order of their seniority within the Department to any classification that has an opening for which that employee qualifies by training or experience. An Officer reduced in rank shall be reinstated to the same position, without further promotional testing, if and when a vacancy exists. For purposes of seniority, all continuous service time immediately preceding the layoff will be considered. E. Employees reduced in rank while in a probationary status shall serve the remainder of the probationary period upon assumption of their previous rank. Employees laid off while in an entry-level probationary status will serve the entire probationary period upon their return to work. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 16 Packet Page 185 of 415 Article 20 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Grievances or disputes that may arise, including the interpretation of this Agreement, shall be settled in the following manner: The Union grievance committee, upon receiving a written and signed petition of a member or members, shall determine if a grievance exists. In their opinion, if no grievance exists, no further action is necessary. The member or grievance committee must file within 30 calendar days of knowledge of violation unless the Union and the Employer agree to an extension. If the committee deems a grievance does exist they shall, with or without the employee, present this grievance to the Fire Chief for adjustment. If the grievance has not been settled within ten business days, it shall then be submitted to the Mayor's designee for adjustment. The Mayor or his/her representative shall submit a written decision within ten business days. If the grievance is not settled satisfactorily, either party shall give notice within ten business days to the other party of their intent to submit the grievance to arbitration. A representative of the Union and the Employer shall meet within ten business days and attempt to agree on a single arbitrator. If unable to reach agreement they shall request a list of 11 arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (“FMCS”). The list shall be limited to arbitrators who are members of the National Academy of Arbitrators from the Washington and/or Oregon sub-regions. Within ten business days of receipt of same, the parties shall alternately strike the names of the arbitrators until only one name remains, who shall hear the dispute. The party striking first will be the loser of the flip of a coin. The arbitrator shall render his/her decision within 30 calendar days after a hearing. The arbitrator shall have no power to render a decision that will add to, subtract from, alter, change, or modify the terms of this Agreement, and his/her power shall be limited to interpretation or application of the express terms of this agreement, and all other matters shall be excluded from arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties; provided that the decision does not involve action by the arbitrator beyond his or her jurisdiction. Each party shall pay the compensation and expenses for its own representatives and witnesses, including attorney’s fees. The parties will share equally the costs and expenses of the arbitrator. Any disputes arising under this Agreement shall be settled as stated in this Article provided that no employee shall avail themselves of this Article if they appeal a dispute to the Civil Service Commission. Any bargaining unit member who is the subject of disciplinary action including oral or written reprimand and who feels such action is improper may complain to the Union and may elect to pursue a grievance regarding disciplinary action through the grievance procedure of this Article or through the Civil Service Commission but not both. Time limits within the grievance procedure may be waived or extended by mutual agreement of both parties. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 17 Packet Page 186 of 415 Article 21 SAVINGS CLAUSE If any provision of this Agreement, or the application of such provision, should be rendered or declared invalid by any court action or by reason of any existing or subsequently enacted legislation, the remaining parts or portions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Article 22 PICKET LINE It shall not be a violation of this Agreement or grounds for discipline or discharge for an employee to refuse to cross a legal picket line in the performance of his/her duties, provided that said picket line is sanctioned by Local 1828 International Association of Firefighters. An employee may not refuse to cross any picket line when his/her duties entail the preservation and/or safety of life and/or property. Article 23 SUPERVISORY DUTIES Employees covered under this Agreement may at times, and in some cases may at all times, perform some of the duties of the supervisor. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way interfere with carrying out said supervisory duties. Article 24 STRIKES During the life of this Agreement there shall be no strikes or refusal to perform official duties and there shall be no lockouts. Article 25 MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS The benefits mutually conferred by this Agreement shall be maintained for the term thereof, notwithstanding increases for the cost of such level of benefits that may occur beyond the control of the parties hereto. This article will not apply to the January 1, 2009 prescription formulary increases for Regence Plan A. Article 26 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS The Union recognizes the Employer’s prerogative to operate and manage its affairs in all respects in accordance with its responsibilities, powers, and authority, and to determine the methods, means, and personnel by which such responsibilities are to be performed, provided that the exercise of such authority is not otherwise contrary to the terms of this Agreement or established past practices. The Employer has the right to discipline or discharge for just cause or to reduce personnel in accordance with the provisions of the City of Edmonds Civil Service Laws and Rules. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 18 Packet Page 187 of 415 Article 27 FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT All contract provisions of this Agreement that are not specifically prohibited by the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the "Act") shall be honored during the term of this Agreement, provided, however: A. That when the hours for any employee reach the maximum established by the Fair Labor Standards Act as the appropriate threshold for the payment of overtime, that all hours worked in excess of that threshold shall be paid at the rate of one and one-half (1.5) times the regular rate of pay as determined in accordance with the Act. B. That nothing herein shall be interpreted to require the pyramiding of wage categories above the regular rate of pay. In the event that the contract shall provide for the payment of an overtime rate of pay, that is, any rate one and one- half (1.5) times the regular rate of pay at a contract threshold less than that established by the Act, that rate shall be deemed to be the overtime rate of pay shall not be again multiplied by the overtime rate established by the Act. Article 28 SAFETY COMMITTEE The Employer and Union agree that Fire Department safety standards are of mutual concern. There shall be a Department Safety Committee composed of two Employer and two Union representatives. The Union representatives shall be selected by the Union. The committee shall make recommendations to the Employer relating to safety standards. The Committee’s recommendations shall not diminish the Employer's exclusive right and responsibility to take such action as it deems necessary and/or appropriate. Article 29 SENIORITY Seniority shall be determined by continuous service in the Edmonds Fire Department, calculated from the date of employment. Continuous service shall be broken only by resignation or discharge other than layoff. Employees with the same date of employment shall be assigned to the Seniority List in order of their ranking on the Civil Service Eligibility List. Article 30 ASSIGNMENT DURING TEMPORARY DISABILITY If an employee becomes temporarily disabled off duty and cannot function as a Firefighter, when mutually acceptable, the Fire Chief or his/her designee may assign the employee to a light duty assignment not to exceed six months. During the light duty assignment, the employee shall continue to receive his/her normal compensation, benefits, and seniority. Benefits shall be adjusted per Article 10 for a temporary assignment to day shift that exceeds two weeks. If an employee becomes temporarily disabled through an on the job injury and cannot function as a Firefighter, the Fire Chief or his/her designee may assign the employee to a light duty assignment for a period not to exceed six months after authorization by the U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 19 Packet Page 188 of 415 employee’s physician and/or a determination of work suitability by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries. During the light duty assignment, the employee shall continue to receive his/her normal compensation, benefits, and seniority. Benefits shall be adjusted per Article 10 for a temporary assignment to day shift that exceeds two weeks. Article 31 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A. This Agreement and any and all Amendments and Modifications hereafter entered into and executed by and between the parties hereto, shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective successors and assigns and any other governmental entity succeeding to the City of Edmonds' obligations there under. B. In the event of any merger, consolidation, annexation or contracting for fire protection services with any other governmental agency by the City of Edmonds, either party shall have the right to reopen this Agreement for negotiation of any positions affected by the merger, consolidation, or annexation. Article 32 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN, PARAMEDIC 1. Emergency Medical Technician A. As a condition of employment, all Fire Department employees who are required to respond to medical emergencies shall maintain State of Washington Department of Health, EMS, and Trauma Systems certification as an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT), and meet State standards and local standards established by the Snohomish County Medical Program Director and the Fire Department Medical Program Director. B. The Employer will provide all books, tuition, instructors’ fees, materials, licensing fees, etc. that are required to maintain EMT certification, and to meet State and local standards. C. The Employer will make available to employees, either on duty or at an overtime rate, training required to maintain EMT certification up to current State and local standards. D. Employees having difficulty maintaining certification shall be given, on Employer time, counseling, additional on-duty study time, and/or reasonable support to maintain the EMT certification. E. Employees who lose their EMT certification following reasonable efforts by the Employer as listed in Sections B, C, and D above may be subject to disciplinary action including termination. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 20 Packet Page 189 of 415 2. Emergency Medical Technician - Paramedic A. As a condition of employment, all Firefighter/Paramedics who are required to respond to medical emergencies shall maintain certification from the State of Washington Department of Health, EMS and Trauma Systems as an EMT- Paramedic, and meet State standards and local standards established by the Snohomish County Medical Program Director and the Fire Department Medical Program Director. B. The Employer will provide all books, tuition, instructors’ fees, materials, and licensing fees, etc. that are required to maintain certification, and to meet State and local standards. C. The Employer will make available to Firefighter/Paramedics, either on duty or at the overtime rate, training required to maintain certification to current State and local standards. D. Firefighter/Paramedics having difficulty maintaining certification shall be given, on Employer time, counseling, additional on-duty study time, and/or reasonable support to maintain the certification. E. Firefighter/Paramedics who lose their certification following reasonable efforts by the Employer as listed in Sections B, C, and D above may be subject to disciplinary action including termination. Article 33 LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The Employer and the Union agree to establish a Labor Management Committee to facilitate discussions regarding matters of mutual interest. The Committee shall consist of Union Officers and Fire Administration. Meetings may be called by either party at a mutually acceptable time. Article 34 DRIVERS LICENSE CHECKS Annually the Employer will visually check each employee’s Washington State driver’s license to ensure validity. Employees are required to notify Fire Administration, their Shift Battalion Chief, or immediate supervisor (Assistant Chief or Fire Marshal) if his/her driver’s license has been suspended or revoked. Failure to notify Fire Administration, the employee’s Shift Battalion Chief, or immediate supervisor immediately upon notice of suspension or revocation may result in disciplinary action. Driving an Employer-owned vehicle or apparatus without a valid Washington State driver’s license may result in disciplinary action. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 21 Packet Page 190 of 415 ARTICLE 35 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TECHNICAL RESCUE TEAMS A.1 Snohomish County Hazardous Materials Team and Snohomish County Technical Rescue Team Fire Department membership and participation in the Snohomish County Hazardous Materials Team and the Snohomish County Technical Rescue Team are at the sole discretion of the Employer. A.2 Number of Team Members The Hazardous Material Team shall have a maximum of six team members. The Technical Rescue Team shall have a maximum of 12 team members. Both teams will be comprised of members from the Operations Division unless otherwise determined by the Fire Chief. A.3 Membership The Employer has the sole right to establish and manage the membership of both teams, and all team operations as it relates to Edmonds Fire Department employees. A.4 Technical Rescue Disciplines As stated in the 1994 Edition of NFPA 1670 Technical Rescue Disciplines shall be identified as: Rope, Structural Collapse, Confined Space, Trench, and Collapse Rescue as outlined in the Snohomish County Technical Rescue Task Force Standard Operating Guidelines. A.5 Team Composition The Employer shall strive to maintain a balance of team members on each of the three shifts depending upon the number of team members. A.6 Application for Membership Individuals wishing to join the team shall submit a request in writing through the chain of command to the Program Manager and Department Coordinator responsible for management of the respective team. The request shall include prior training or experience applicable to team membership and operations. A.7 Selection Selection for team membership is made by the respective Program Manager and Department Coordinator subject to the approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. A.8 Team Membership Employees may serve on only one team. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 22 Packet Page 191 of 415 A.9 Resignation An employee wishing to discontinue team membership shall submit a written request to the Battalion Chief responsible for program management of the respective team. Acceptance of resignation requests will be at the discretion of the Fire Chief. A.10 Membership Requirements/Removal Team members that do not participate in training activities, team meetings, and/or actual responses on a regular basis shall be subject to removal from the team by the Fire Chief. Team members shall demonstrate on an annual basis their competency for team membership in the form of a written and/ or practical examination and response to emergency alarms when available and capable of doing so. Members failing to meet skills proficiency requirements shall be given a one-time retest opportunity. Members that fail the retest are removed from the team and all associated benefits are immediately terminated. The Fire Chief retains the right to remove members from the team for just cause. Any team member removed, other than through a reduction in force, may not re-apply for reinstatement for a period of two years without the approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. A.11 Training/Medical Compliance For hazardous materials team members, the Employer will maintain training and medical monitoring in accordance with applicable laws. All medical records will be kept confidential. A.12 Operational Guidelines Operational guidelines shall be developed by the Employer with input from team members. Final authority for adoption of operational guidelines resides with the Employer. A.13 Training The Employer shall make training available for team members to remain proficient as outlined in NFPA and regional standard operating guidelines at the Priority One Level. A.14 Recordkeeping The Employer, through the Fire Department Training Office, shall be responsible to ensure that all training, medical, and exposure records are maintained for team members. Team members shall cooperate in this effort. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 23 Packet Page 192 of 415 Article 36 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be effective the first day of January 2008 and shall remain in full force and effect until the thirty-first day of December 2010 provided, however, that this Agreement shall be subject to such change or modification as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto; provided further, however, that this Agreement shall remain in effect during the course of negotiation on a new Agreement. IN WITNESS HEREOF, we hereto attach our signatures as of this _____ day of ____________________, 2008. CITY OF EDMONDS _______________________________ MAYOR Attest: LOCAL 1828, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ CITY CLERK U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 24 Packet Page 193 of 415 SUPPLEMENT to the AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDMONDS and LOCAL 1828, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS APPENDIX “A” — WAGES A.1 Pay Plan A.1.a Employees covered by this Agreement will receive wages according to the following Pay Plan. Each step represents one year of service. The Inspector rate of pay will be the same pay scale used for Lieutenants as designated below. A.1.b Pay Differentials All pay increases will be based on the Firefighter 1st Class base pay as set forth in the pay differential scale below: Probationary Firefighter 73% of Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 4th Class 79% of Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 3rd Class 85% of Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 2nd Class 92% of Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 1st Class 100% of Firefighter 1st Class Probationary Firefighter/Paramedic 112% of Probationary Firefighter Firefighter/Paramedic 4th Class 112% of Firefighter 4th Class Firefighter/Paramedic 3rd Class 112% of Firefighter 3rd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 2nd Class 112% of Firefighter 2nd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 1st Class 112% of Firefighter 1st Class Probationary Lieutenant 108% of Firefighter 1st Class Lieutenant 115% of Firefighter 1st Class Captain 122% of Firefighter 1st Class Probationary Battalion Chief 125% Above Firefighter 1st Class Battalion Chief 1st Class 135% of Firefighter 1st Class U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 25 Packet Page 194 of 415 A.2 2008 Wage Rates Effective January 1, 2008 the Firefighter 1st Class rate of pay shall be set forth within Section A.2 as follows which reflects a 7.5% percent increase of the 2007 rate. The following pay scale reflects monthly base pay: SHIFT PERSONNEL Probationary Firefighter 4263 Firefighter 4th Class 4613 Firefighter 3rd Class 4963 Firefighter 2nd Class 5372 Firefighter 1st Class 5839 Probationary Firefighter/Paramedic 4774 Firefighter/Paramedic 4th Class 5167 Firefighter/Paramedic 3rd Class 5559 Firefighter/Paramedic 2nd Class 6017 Firefighter/Paramedic 1st Class 6540 Probationary Lieutenant 6307 Lieutenant 6715 Captain 7124 Probationary Battalion Chief 7299 Battalion Chief 1st Class 7883 A.2.a 2009 Wage Rates Effective January 1, 2009 the Firefighter 1st Class rate of pay shall be increased as set forth within Section A.2 as follows: 100 percent of the percentage rate of change in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton CPI-U for the period of June 1, 2007 through June 1, 2008. All other ranks will increase as set forth in A.1.b. A.2.b 2010 Wage Rates Effective January 1, 2010 the Firefighter 1st Class rate of pay shall be increased as set forth within Section A.2 as follows: 100 percent of the percentage rate of change in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton CPI-U for the period of June 1, 2008 through June 1, 2009. All other ranks will increase as set forth in A.1.b. A.3 Time in Grade Increases and Classifications A.3.a Time in grade increases to the next higher step shall be made after an employee is paid at a given pay step for one full year. If the completion of such year occurs at other than the beginning of a semimonthly pay period, the increase shall be effective at the beginning of the next semimonthly pay period. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 26 Packet Page 195 of 415 A.3.b Promotional reclassification shall be at least to the next higher salary step on the Pay Plan as described in section A.1.b and A.3.c. Demotion reclassification shall be to the step in the same year of longevity the employee had prior to demotion to the lower classification. A.3.c Position Classification. For the three year duration of this agreement, position classification shall be: Position Grade Battalion Chief 1st Class Probationary Battalion Chief Captain Lieutenant Probationary Lieutenant Inspector (Assignment) Probationary Inspector (Assignment) Firefighter/Paramedic 1st Class Firefighter/Paramedic 2nd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 3rd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 4th Class Probationary Firefighter/Paramedic Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 2nd Class Firefighter 3rd Class Firefighter 4th Class Probationary Firefighter A.4 Tuition Reimbursement Tuition reimbursement for classes listed in A.7.a will be covered at 100% of the cost based on an annual budget limit equal to $1,500 per employee. A.5 Longevity Pay An employee shall receive in addition to his/her monthly rate of pay set forth within Section A.2, as further amended by Section A.3 and all subsequent wage increases, monthly Longevity Pay in accordance with the following: SENIORITY MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY At the completion of: 6 years 2% of employee's monthly rate of pay 12 years 4% of employee's monthly rate of pay 18 years 6% of employee's monthly rate of pay 24 years 8% of employee’s monthly rate of pay A.6 Education Pay An employee who has completed the new hire probationary period for the position and elects to waive the Longevity Pay set forth within Section A.5 shall receive in addition to his/her monthly rate of pay set forth within Section A.2, as further U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 27 Packet Page 196 of 415 amended by Section A.3 and all subsequent wage increases, monthly Education Pay in accordance with the following: JOB-RELATED COLLEGE CREDITS MONTHLY EDUCATION PAY AA Degree or 90 Credits 2% of employee's monthly rate of pay 135 Credits 4% of employee's monthly rate of pay BA/BS Degree 6% of employee's monthly rate of pay A.6.a Job-related college credits shall mean all credits within the fields of study listed below and also accepted by a nationally accredited college or university recognized by the United States Department of Education. Members currently receiving any educational incentive pay will continue their eligibility for educational pay. Fields of Study Fire Science Fire Investigation/Inspection Fire Administration Fire Engineering Business Administration Public Administration Emergency Medical Services Registered Nurse Health and Safety Management A.6.b Once each 12 months an employee may elect to change compensation plans from Education to Longevity or from Longevity to Education. If an employee elects Education Pay, the portion of the Education Pay equal to the Longevity Pay that the employee had the option to elect to receive shall be considered as Longevity Pay. It is the responsibility of the employee electing to go from Education Pay to Longevity Pay or from Longevity Pay to Education Pay to initiate the change request in writing to Fire Administration. A.7 Special Operations Pay – Hazardous Material and Technical Rescue Hazardous Materials Team or Technical Rescue Team Members shall have added to their base pay a premium of two percent of Firefighter 1st Class base monthly pay upon technical certification(s) as established for full hazardous materials team membership or full technical rescue team membership as determined by the Fire Chief. Administration and operations of the two teams is addressed in Article 35. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 28 Packet Page 197 of 415 APPENDIX “B” — HEALTH AND WELLNESS PROGRAM Appendix B is supplemental to the Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters, covering the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010 as modified. It is understood and agreed by and between the undersigned parties to the current labor agreement between the parties signatories hereto, the following shall serve as a controlling document with respect to the maintenance of a Health and Wellness Program and the procedures by which the aforementioned program shall be administered. A. There is an Advisory Committee made up of one Union member from each shift, the physician, the consultant, and the Fire Chief or his/her designee. The Advisory Committee will advise the City and the Union concerning any proposed changes in the tests and procedures used in the Health and Wellness Program. B. The medical fitness profile as set forth in Exhibit 1 of this Appendix shall be mandatory (payable at the overtime rate) and be administered by the Advisory Committee's designated physician herein referred to as the physician. C. Special tests shall be devised for the employees who have physical handicaps or limitations that interfere with the ability to do one or more of the regular test procedures. D. Following the medical fitness profile, each employee shall be encouraged to commence on a voluntary physical conditioning program. E. Exhibit 2 of this Appendix outlines the schedule for the Medical Fitness Profile. F. All employees covered by this Appendix who are classified as Firefighters Act II (LEOFF II) employees shall be protected against loss of pay for time off work due to any injury sustained while participating in sanctioned conditioning programs in the Fire Station environment. Should any LEOFF II employee become disabled due to an injury of the aforementioned nature, the Employer shall compensate the employee for all time off work beyond the depletion of any accrued sick leave benefits until such time as the employee shall have begun to receive State Disability Benefits, provided that the Employer will receive credit for any other employment or disability benefits received by the employee during that time. G. During year one of the agreement (2008) the Employer and the Union agree to develop a mandatory physical fitness program. If a mandatory physical fitness program mutually acceptable to both parties is developed and formally adopted by December 31, 2008, one percent will be added to 1st Class Firefighter pay beginning January 1, 2009. An additional one percent will be added to 1st Class Firefighter pay beginning January 1, 2010. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 29 Packet Page 198 of 415 EXHIBIT 1 TO APPENDIX "B" MEDICAL FITNESS PROFILE Description of Medical Fitness Profile: 1. Treadmill This exercise tolerance test is one of the most sensitive tests available to establish or rule out evidence of coronary artery diseases. It is useful to determine exercise capacity and to rule out any complicating factors that might be related to starting an exercise program. The treadmill test consists of a series of three-minute stages, starting out at a slow, 1.7 miles-per-hour walk with a 10 percent grade and increasing in speed and grade every three minutes until the subject reaches his/her maximum level of exertion. The standard protocol developed by Dr. Bruce at the University of Washington is used for this test so that the subject’s results can be compared to others of the same age and sex. The subject’s blood pressure will be monitored every three minutes throughout the test. Continuous EKG monitoring can be done while on the treadmill. The subject will continue walking until he/she has reached the maximum determined by his/her own symptoms, such as shortness of breath, or until directed to stop by the administrator based on the findings on the ECG monitor or other physical examination, blood pressure, and ECG monitoring. The subject will continue walking throughout a recovery period of six minutes. 2. Blood Profile A sample of blood will be taken at testing by a registered nurse. From this sample a battery of laboratory tests will be performed to determine levels of specific chemicals in the blood stream. These figures will be compared to normal values (usually presented as a range of values). If large discrepancies exist between subject’s values and the normal range values, it is recommend that the subject seek his/her physician's advice. Some interesting values to note are cholesterol and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) levels. The level of cholesterol will indicate how much cholesterol is circulating in the blood stream; high cholesterol levels have been linked to atherosclerosis. Higher HDL percentages are also thought to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis. 3. Body Composition Measurement Body composition measurement determines the relative percentages of different body tissues and compartments. The most commonly requested information is the percentage of body fat. Body composition can be measured by using many methods. Some of the most common methods include Hydrostatic weighing (dunk tank), skin caliper, height/weight charts, and a U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 30 Packet Page 199 of 415 new method that determines body composition through electrical impedance. This profile will employ the electrical impedance method, specifically the RJL BIA-103 impedance systems because of its high reliability and ease of measurement. A recent study indicated that this method had a .99 reliability coefficient and when compared to other methods of body composition it has been shown to provide accurate measurement. Because the equipment measures total body water, any fluctuations in body fluids will result in erroneous results. Therefore, it is important to follow the guidelines below. Subject should not: a. eat for four-to-five hours prior to test b. exercise for 12 hours prior to test c. consume alcoholic beverages for 24 hours prior to test d. be on diuretic medication. 4. Pulmonary Function Screen This test measures forced vital capacity and percentage exhaled in the first second along with other ratios and a plotted curve sufficient for screening for pulmonary disease and providing baseline pulmonary function data. 5. Other Tests Any other test recommended by the Physical Fitness Advisory Committee. The Employer and Union agree to review profile elements contained in Exhibit 1 in year one of the agreement, and to align and update the medical fitness profile with best practices during the review period, and implement changes beginning in year two (2009) of the agreement. EXHIBIT 2 TO APPENDIX "B" MEDICAL FITNESS PROFILE AND PHYSICAL AGILITY TEST SCHEDULE Medical Physical Fitness Profile Annual hire date anniversary U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 31 Packet Page 200 of 415 ADDENDUM—DRUG TESTING PROCESS The drug and alcohol testing procedures outlined in this document shall become part of the current labor Agreement between the City of Edmonds and the Edmonds Firefighters, Local 1828, IAFF. A. GENERAL 1. The City and the Union recognize that drug and alcohol use by employees is a threat to public welfare and the safety of department personnel. It is the goal of the parties to eliminate workplace drug and alcohol use through preventative education and assistance with the rehabilitative process. However, it is the City policy that: a. The illegal use of drugs and the use of alcohol at the workplace by all employees is prohibited b. Employees shall not be impaired by the use of alcohol or drugs or engaged in the illegal use of drugs at the workplace c. All employees shall behave in conformance with the requirements established under the Drug Free Work Place Act of 1988 d. Employees who engage in the illegal use of drugs or who are impaired by the use of alcohol at the workplace will be held to the same qualification standards for employment or job performance and behavior to which the entity holds its other employees, even if any unsatisfactory performance or behavior is related to the employee's drug use or alcoholism. 2. Employees shall be informed of the Drug Testing process as outlined herein. Employees who are required to take a test shall be informed of how the test is conducted, what the test determines, and what the consequences are of testing positive. New employees will be provided with this information at the time of hire. 3. Employees shall not be subject to random drug or alcohol testing, except as specified in Section 13 of this Addendum. If specific objective facts and reasonable cause, however, lead the supervisor to believe that the employee is impaired by the use of drugs or alcohol while on the job and his or her job performance would be impaired, then the City may require the employee to undergo a drug or alcohol test, as provided herein. The employee has the right to have a Union Representative or Union member designee present during the employee's submission to the testing process, provided this request does not unreasonably delay the testing process. The employee will be required to sign a Consent Form for the testing, and an unreasonable refusal to execute the consent form for a test, as specified in this addendum, shall be grounds for disciplinary action. A supervisor shall transport the employee to the testing facility and, following the test, to the employee's residence. The employee will be placed in a paid U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 32 Packet Page 201 of 415 Sick Leave status until the test results are known. If the employee does not have any sick leave available, he or she will be placed in a paid administrative leave status. If the results are negative, the employee's time will be charged to paid Administrative Leave and his sick leave will be re- instated. The records and referral will be handled in a confidential manner. 4. Employees who voluntarily come forward and ask for assistance to deal with a drug or alcohol problem will not be disciplined by the City, unless they refuse the EAP's reasonable opportunity for rehabilitative assistance or fail to successfully complete the rehabilitative program. If, within two years following an employee's voluntary request for assistance, the same employee is referred to testing under the provisions of Section 3 above and tests positive, the City may also use disciplinary action in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. B. DRUG TESTING 1. The collection and testing of urine samples shall be performed by a NIDA- certified laboratory that has been mutually agreed upon by the City and Union and identified in this Addendum. Samples collected after regular working hours and on weekends will be taken by a mutually agreed upon medical facility as also identified herein. The collection of samples, regarding security, freedom from adulteration, and chain of custody, shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the NIDA standards. Employees shall not be witnessed while submitting a urine sample. If the NIDA standards, rules, or procedures are breached or violated, the results of the test will be negative. 2. The laboratory shall test for the classes of drugs listed in the NIDA standards, using the listed initial and confirmation cutoff levels for positive readings. The initial testing shall use the immunoassay method. All specimens identified as positive on the initial test shall be confirmed using the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) technique. 3. A split sample shall be secured with each sample collection. The split sample will be preserved in the manner prescribed by the NIDA standards. In the event of a positive test result, the employee has the right to submit the reserved portion of the split sample to an independent laboratory for further confirmation testing. Confirmation testing of the split sample must be done in accordance with the processes and standards, as specified in this Addendum. Split samples from positive tests shall be retained by the laboratory for at least one year or for the duration of any grievance or legal proceedings before destruction of the sample. C. ALCOHOL TESTING 1. A Breathalyzer shall be used to screen for alcohol use. The screening shall be conducted on test equipment by an individual, both of which must be certified by the Washington State Patrol and follow their testing standards and related State legal requirements. If the test is conducted by an individual U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 33 Packet Page 202 of 415 known to the employee, the test must be witnessed by another qualified individual. A positive blood alcohol test level shall be .04 percent or more. 2. Tests resulting in a positive reading on the Breathalyzer shall be confirmed shortly thereafter by a standard Blood Alcohol test. The test shall be conducted by the nearest State qualified medical laboratory or hospital, as mutually agreed upon by the City and Union and identified in this Addendum. Test samples, including split samples, shall be treated with the same degree of security and shall use the same chain of custody procedures as provided in this Addendum for drug sample tests. Test results shall be considered positive when the blood alcohol exceeds .04 percent or more. Test results below .04 percent shall be considered negative. D. MEDICAL REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION 1. The Medical Review Physician shall be chosen and agreed upon between the Union and the City and must be a licensed physician with a knowledge of substance abuse disorders. The Medical Review Physician shall be familiar with the characteristics of the test (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value), the laboratory running the test, and the employee’s medical conditions and exposures. The role of the Medical Review Physician will be to review and interpret the positive test results. The physician must examine alternate medical explanations for any positive test results. This action shall include conducting a medical interview with the affected employee, a review of the employee's medical history, and a review of any other relevant biomedical factors. The Medical Review Physician shall conduct his or her review in full accordance with the NIDA standards. The physician shall determine whether the test results are valid or invalid and shall notify the City and the employee of his/her decision. E. TEST RESULTS 1. The City will treat the employee's test results as confidential. The City shall pay for the initial testing, including the physician. If the employee elects to have the split sample tested, the employee must pay for that test. However, if, as a result of the split sample test, it can be proven that the initial test resulted in a false positive, then the City will reimburse the employee the cost of the split sample test. If either the initial or subsequent split samples test negative, the laboratory will notify the City. As soon as possible, the City will notify the employee of the negative results, clear the employee of the drug or alcohol suspicion, and immediately discard the test results. F. CONSEQUENCES OF A POSITIVE TEST RESULT 1. An employee who tests positive for drugs or alcohol will be referred to the City's Employee Assistance Program. The City will provide assistance to the U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 34 Packet Page 203 of 415 extent covered by the City's employee benefit and leave policies. Discipline, if any is taken, will be based upon the employee's participation in the EAP's recommended rehabilitation program and the severity of any offenses committed while under the influence. 2. Employees who complete a rehabilitation program may be periodically tested once per quarter without notice for a two-year period. An employee who tests positive during this period will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including suspension and termination, depending upon the severity of the circumstances. Employees who complete the rehabilitation program and are released for active duty will be returned to their normal duty assignment. After three years without any further drug or alcohol violations, the employee's past related offense cannot be considered by the City in any progressive disciplinary action. Records of the violation will be removed from the employee's personnel file and sealed from the supervisor's review immediately upon reaching the end of the three-year period. G. HOLD HARMLESS 1. The drug testing program was solely initiated at the City’s request. The Union shall be held harmless and indemnified, including the costs for reasonable attorney's fees, for the violation of any employee's rights by the City arising from the administration of the testing process. H. CHANGES IN THE NIDA STANDARDS 1. The NIDA standards that are referenced in this Addendum are contained in the Federal Register, Department of Health and Human Services, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, dated April 11, 1988. Should these standards be updated or changed during the life of this Agreement, the City and the Union agree that the provisions of this Addendum shall be based upon the latest NIDA standards in effect. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA2/1/2008 35 Packet Page 204 of 415 AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDMONDS and LOCAL 1828, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS effective January 1, 2007 2008 through December 31, 2007 2010 PREAMBLE This Agreement is entered into by the City of Edmonds (Employer) and Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters (Union). The purpose of this Agreement is to achieve and maintain harmonious relations between the Employer and the Union, to provide for equitable and peaceful adjustment of differences that may arise, and to establish proper standards of wages, hours, and other employment conditions. ARTICLE Page ARTICLE Page 1. Recognition 2 21. Savings Clause 178 2. Union Security 2 22. Picket Line 178 3. Payroll Deduction 2 23. Supervisory Duties 18 4. Discrimination 3 24. Strikes 18 5. Union Business 3 25. Maintenance of Benefits 18 6. Union Bulletin Boards 3 26. Management Rights 18 7. Meetings 3 27. Fair Labor Standards Acts 189 8. Working Rules 4 28. Safety Committee 19 9. Wages 4 29. Seniority 19 10. Hours 4 30. Assignment During 11. Vacations 7 Temporary Disability 19 12. Overtime Pay 8 31. Successors and Assigns 1920 13. Insurance 9 32. Emergency Medical 14. Holidays 10 Technician and Emergency 15. Clothing Allowance 12 Medical Technician, 16. Mileage Allowance 12 Paramedic 20 17. Working Out of Class 12 33. Labor Management 18. Sick Leave 13 Committee 21 19. Layoff and Recall 15 34. Drivers License Checks 21 20. Grievance Procedure 167 35. Hazardous Materials and Technical Rescue Teams 22 35. 36.Term of Agreement 224 Appendix “A” — Wages 2325 Appendix “B” — Health and Wellness Program 2730 Exhibit 1 - Medical Fitness Profile 2831 Exhibit 2 - Physical Agility Test 3033 Exhibit 3 2 - Medical Fitness Profile and Physical Agility Test Schedule 3134 Addendum - Drug Testing 3235 U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 1 Packet Page 205 of 415 Article 1 RECOGNITION The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative for all uniformed employees of the Fire Department except the Fire Chief, Assistant Chief, Fire Marshal, and Training and Safety Chief. Article 2 UNION SECURITY It shall be a condition of employment that all employees of the Employer covered by this Agreement who are members of the Union in good standing on the effective date of the Agreement shall remain members in good standing and those who are not members on the effective date of this Agreement, shall, on the 31st day following the effective date of this Agreement, become and remain members in good standing in the Union. It shall also be a condition of employment that all employees covered by this Agreement hired on or after its effective date shall, on the 31st day following the beginning of such employment, become and remain members in good standing in the Union. Upon confirmation of employment, the Union President, or his/her designee, will give the new employee a new member orientation that outlines the current collective labor agreement between the Union and the Employer. During that orientation the new member will be made aware of the provisions of this article, asked if the employee has any objections to being a new member of IAFF Union Local 1828 meeting RCW 41.56.122, and describe the agency fee option. A written confirmation of the member’s status will be forwarded to the Fire Chief following the orientation. If an employee: A. For bonafide religious tenets as per RCW 41.56.122(1), does not desire to be a member of the Union, one of the following shall apply: 1. Pay a service charge each month equivalent to regular Union dues to the Union, or 2. Pay an amount of money each month equivalent to regular current Union dues to the Union who shall then transmit that amount to a non-religious charity that is agreeable to the Union and the Employer. B. Written authorization is necessary for the payroll deduction of Union dues or alternative payments as set forth in sub-paragraphs 1 and 2 above. Article 3 PAYROLL DEDUCTION The Employer agrees to deduct, once each month, dues from the pay of those employees covered by this Agreement. The total amount of deductions shall be remitted by the Employer to the Treasurer of the Union. This authorization shall remain in force during the term of this Agreement. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 2 Packet Page 206 of 415 The employer further agrees to deduct contributions from the pay of those employees who have voluntarily signed an authorized payroll deduction form for the purpose of the Union’s post-retirement medical fund and/or its political action fund. The deductions shall remain in effect until the employee voluntarily withdraws the authorization in writing. The Union shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the City on account of the payroll deduction authorization. Article 4 DISCRIMINATION The Employer agrees not to unlawfully discriminate against any employee for his/her activity on behalf of, or membership in, the Union. The Employer and the Union agree that there shall be no unlawful discrimination against any employee because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender expression, or identity, age, or religion, natural origin, marital status, or physical, sensory, or mental disability. Complaints of discrimination under this section shall be subject to the grievance procedure. However, if the Employer and the Union have not reached agreement at the conclusion of the Mayor's consideration of the grievance, the matter may then be submitted to the appropriate governmental agency or civil action and will not be an arbitratable matter. The employee and Union shall not be entitled to proceed with a grievance procedure, or receive the benefits of any grievance settlement or award, if either the employee or Union pursues an administrative or civil action based on substantially the same allegations as contained in the grievance. The Employer and the Union agree to cooperate in providing reasonable accommodation for qualified disabled persons. Article 5 UNION BUSINESS Employees elected to local, state or international Union office may be granted reasonable time to perform their Union functions, including conventions and conferences, without loss of pay. With approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee, Union officers are collectively allowed up to 120 hours off duty annually to conduct Union business. Time off for Union activities will not cause the Employer additional money if at all possible. Article 6 UNION BULLETIN BOARDS The Employer agrees to permit suitable bulletin boards in convenient places in each station and work area to be used by the Union. The Union shall limit its posting of notices and bulletins to such bulletin boards. Article 7 MEETINGS Meeting rooms at any of the fire stations or City building facilities may be used for Union meetings. The meetings will be scheduled by the Union Executive Board. All on duty U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 3 Packet Page 207 of 415 employees may attend any Union meetings unless there is a scheduled conflict. The scheduling for the use of the meeting rooms will be coordinated by the Union and the Fire Chief and/or his/her designee. Article 8 WORKING RULES The Fire Department may adopt rules, regulations, policies, and procedures for the Department’s operation and the conduct of its employees provided such do not conflict with any of the provisions of this Agreement. Article 9 WAGES The classification of positions covered by this Agreement and the corresponding rates of pay shall be as set forth in Appendix A, which is attached hereto and part of this Agreement. Article 10 HOURS A. Work Period 1. Day Shift Personnel The work period for day workers of eight hours a day shall normally consist of five shifts equal to 40 hours, each shift normally starting at 0800 and ending at 1700 hours, Monday through Friday. Other day shift work schedules may be worked subject to mutual agreement between the Employer and the Union. In a 4-10 work schedule, assigned day personnel work from 0630 hours to 1730 hours with an hour off for lunch that is taken at an unspecified time during the day. 2. Shift Personnel The work period for shift personnel shall be 24 hours. The average work week for shift workers may consist of two shifts per week, equal to 48 hours, each shift normally starting at 0800 and ending at 0800 the following day. If an employee has his/her schedule changed from shift work to day work (a 48- hour work week to a 40-hour work week), or from day work to shift work (a 40- hour work week to a 48-hour work week), the following formula will be used to convert all accumulated benefit hours (vacation, sick leave, holiday): ~ when transferring from a 48-hour week to a 40-hour week, all accumulated benefit hours will be multiplied by .834; ~ when transferring from a 40-hour week to a 48-hour week, all accumulated benefit hours will be multiplied by 1.2. Personnel assigned to a Special Detail by the Fire Chief may be assigned to a Day Shift work schedule if the special detail exceeds two weeks in duration. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 4 Packet Page 208 of 415 B. Kelly Day In accordance with Section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, a 21-day work period is established for shift employees. The 21-day work period shall consist of recurring cycles of one shift on duty and two shifts off duty with each seventh scheduled shift being an additional shift off known as a "Kelly day.” The "Kelly day" shall be taken in order to reduce the annual average number of hours worked to the level provided for by this Agreement. 1. Individual Kelly days are selected in such a manner to ensure that two Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift. C. Shift Exchanges Shift exchanges are considered a privilege that must not be abused and trades must be conducted in a reasonable manner. Members may exchange shifts with prior approval of the Fire Chief and/or his/her designee in accordance with the following guidelines. 1. All trades of over four hours must be approved by the affected Officers. Members are allowed no more than four trades greater than 12 hours each month without permission of a Chief Officer. 2. Trades may be approved as long as there are qualified personnel to fill out shift positions. “Acting Out-of-Classification" positions that are created by trades shall be paid in accordance with the Acting Out-of-Classification Section of this Contract. 3. If at all possible, exchanges will not cost the Employer additional money. Whenever multiple officers are scheduled at a station, the exchanging officer will be sent to a station that is absent a shift officer and no acting out-of-class pay will be paid at that station. 4. Firefighter/Paramedics shall arrange their shift exchanges in such a manner that the exchange does not cause an overtime and two Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift. 5. Battalion Chiefs shall arrange their shift exchanges in such a manner that the exchange does not cause an overtime and the Battalion Chief function is covered on that shift by another Battalion Chief or an employee qualified to act out of class in the Battalion Chief position. 6. Probationary employees within the first 12 months of employment will be allowed to trade only in cases of emergency and with permission of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. 7. Purpose or reason for trade shall be a personal matter and shall not be cause for denial of trade requests. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 5 Packet Page 209 of 415 D. Training Employees assigned to attend the State Fire Academy or similar training, either as a recruit or as an instructor, for more than two weeks will receive the following: 1. Option to stay, at Employer expense, at the Academy or lodge at a mutually acceptable site at or near the Academy. 2. Mileage allowance as per Employer policy for one round trip per week to and from the Academy including the graduation ceremony. 3. Food service as provided by the Academy. 4. Compensation at the overtime rate for off-duty students and instructors who participate at approved training. Members enrolled in the Everett Community College Fire Academy, Bates Technical College Fire Academy Program at North Bend, or a similar part-time or full-time academy off duty will be paid at the overtime rate as required. Attendance on scheduled duty days may include return to duty when class is concluded. 5. Time off as per Union contract. 6. Required clothing and equipment as identified by the Fire Academy. E. Minimum Staffing The Employer and the Union agree to maintain 12 employees on duty at the regular hourly rate of pay to staff the three stations at all times, at least two of whom are Firefighter/Paramedics. In the event of proposed layoffs of Union positions as described by Article 19 of this agreement, the Union agrees to bargain the impact of the provision with the Employer during the life of the agreement. Employees will be allowed time off, in addition to the scheduled Kelly days, for vacation and holidays provided they do not exceed a maximum of four employees off per shift. Any sick leave, disability leave, military leave, training or other leave granted under the terms of the Agreement will not interrupt scheduled vacation or holiday time off. Callbacks as needed to maintain the minimum staffing will be compensated at the overtime rate. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 6 Packet Page 210 of 415 Article 11 VACATIONS Each employee covered by this Agreement shall accrue the following number of paid vacation hours beginning with: HOURS Accrued Time Shift Personnel Non-shift Personnel Months six through eleven 48 40 Years one through four 120 80 Years five through nine 168 120 Years ten through fourteen 216 160 Years fifteen through nineteen 264 176 Years twenty through twenty-four 288 200 Year twenty-five and beyond 288 216 At no time may more than four employees be off for vacation, holiday, sick leave incentive, or Kelly day without approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. Employees shall schedule vacation time annually. Vacation requests are subject to the approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. Vacation leave is administered per SOP 501.10. Accrued vacation hours may be carried over to subsequent years; maximum allowable accrual is two years worth of earned vacation hours. Upon attainment of the maximum vacation accrual, vacation accrual shall cease until such a time as the leave balance drops below the maximum. Employees are responsible for managing their vacation time within Department scheduling procedures that are affected by any City sick leave incentive program that results in an award of additional vacation time. The City shall not incur overtime expense to cover for employees who face a use- it-or- lose-it vacation time scenario caused by their failure to manage, schedule, and/or take vacation through the vacation scheduling process. For purposes of vacation scheduling, Firefighter/Paramedics shall schedule in such a manner that two qualified Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift once each shift has four Firefighter/Paramedics assigned. In the interim, two Firefighter/Paramedics shall be on duty 24 hours every shift except when one Firefighter/Paramedic has a scheduled Kelly day. In this scenario, one additional Firefighter/Paramedic, for a total of two, may be off, provided that the position is available for vacation as described in SOP 501.10. Employees who are dismissed or resign with less than 12 months of service shall not receive pay for any accumulated, unused vacation hours. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 7 Packet Page 211 of 415 Article 12 OVERTIME PAY Shift personnel shall be paid one-and-one-half times (1.5) their regular hourly rate based on 48-hour work week as specified in Appendix A for all authorized hours worked in excess of their regularly scheduled work week. The regular monthly salary includes base salary, longevity/educational pay, and hazardous materials/technical rescue physical fitness pay. The formula for determining the hourly rate for shift personnel is regular monthly salary times 12 months divided by 2,496 hours. The formula for determining the hourly rate for day shift personnel is regular monthly salary times 12 months divided by 2,080 hours. Day personnel shall be paid one-and-one-half times (1.5) their regular hourly rate based on 40-hour work week for all authorized hours worked in excess of their regularly scheduled work week. Employees who are called back to work from off-duty shall receive overtime pay for the minimum time as specified below: A. Mandatory Work All employees covered by the terms of this Agreement who are called back to work from off-duty shall be paid at least three hours minimum. B. Pager Calls When responding voluntarily to pager calls employees shall be paid a one hour minimum pursuant to Fire Department guidelines. C. Drills Voluntary drills will be paid at a minimum one hour where attendance is pursuant to Fire Department guidelines. D. Hold-Over Any call extending longer than 15 minutes beyond duty time shall be paid at a minimum of one hour. E. Battalion Chief/Officer Meetings Off duty Battalion Chiefs and Officers who attend mandatory staff meetings shall be paid a minimum of two hours of pay per meeting. F. Court Pay An employee subpoenaed to testify in his/her official capacity while off duty shall be paid a minimum of one hour. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 8 Packet Page 212 of 415 G. Compensatory Time There shall be no compensatory time off. H. All-Personnel Meetings There will be at least one Department personnel meeting per year. These meetings will be mandatory except for absences due to conflict from scheduled and emergency leaves, i.e., vacations, sick leave, and education. Off duty employees shall be paid a one hour minimum but will not be subject to the minimum call-back hours as in Section A. I. Department Safety Committee Meetings Off-duty Safety Committee Members who attend mandatory Fire Department Safety Meetings will be paid at a minimum one hour. Safety Committee meetings, which will not normally exceed one per calendar quarter, may be scheduled at a time when one of the Union Safety members is on duty. J. Firefighter/Paramedic Run Review On and off-duty attendance by Firefighter/Paramedics at run review is mandatory without an excused absence from the Fire Chief or his/her designee. Off-duty Firefighter/Paramedics attending run review shall be paid at a minimum of one-hour. Article 13 INSURANCE A. LEOFF The Employer shall pay those costs necessary to provide employees adequate coverage to meet the requirements of the Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters Act as presently revised under State Law for various employees. In the event the Washington Department of Retirement Services or a court of competent jurisdiction determines after the exhaustion of all applicable appeals that an employee previously employed by Medic Seven at the time of integration is ineligible for LEOFF II membership, the Employer has no obligation to compensate the employee for the difference between the LEOFF II and any PERS retirement system, and the employee will belong to that retirement system to which they are entitled to belong under State law. B. Coverage Provided The Employer shall make available to eligible regular full-time employees and their eligible spouses and dependents, an insurance program that includes medical, dental, and vision insurance, and an employee assistance plan (EAP) benefit. For purposes of this article “spouse” shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 9 Packet Page 213 of 415 in a domestic partnership which has been registered with the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. This insurance program includes the following: 1. Medical Insurance. Employees may choose between the following medical plans: Association of Washington Cities (“AWC”) Plan A or AWC Group Health Cooperative Co-pay Plan 1. 2. Dental Insurance. Dental insurance is provided through the AWC Washington Dental Service Plan F with Option III (orthodontia). 3. Vision Insurance. Vision insurance is provided through the AWC Vision Service Plan ($10.00 deductible). 4. EAP Benefit. The Employee Assistance Program is provided through AWC. C. Payment of Premiums For all eligible regular full-time employees, the Employer will pay 100 percent of the aggregate premium costs of the benefits specified in Section B. For eligible spouses and dependents, the Employer will pay 90 percent of the aggregate premium costs of the benefits specified in Section B. D. Changes to Health Insurance Plans 1. In the event that AWC adopts benefit changes to the health insurance plans specified in this Article during the term of this Agreement, such changes will be automatically incorporated into this Agreement. If the changes reduce the benefit or requires an additional contribution by the employee, the employer agrees to bargain both the decision and the impact of the change. 2. The Employer may change health insurance plans during the term of the Agreement provided that any replacement plan provides substantially equal or better benefits. E. Life Insurance The Employer will provide a life insurance benefit to eligible employees in accord with its Personnel Policies. Article 14 HOLIDAYS A. Designation of Holidays The following days shall be considered Holidays: New Year's Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, day immediately after Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. Each employee shall receive a "floater" holiday in lieu of Lincoln's Birthday U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 10 Packet Page 214 of 415 holiday. The floater may be taken at a time designated by the employee and approved by the supervisor. If the employee chooses and/or is required to work on the designated floater day it will be treated the same as working any other holiday. B. Day Personnel All day employees shall be paid for all such holidays regardless upon which day in the week the holiday should fall. If any work is performed by such an employee on such holiday additional compensation at the overtime rate shall be paid not to exceed eight hours. No employee shall be called to work on such a holiday for less than a minimum call-out time and rate. For day workers, whenever any of the aforementioned holidays falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be the holiday, and when any of the aforementioned holidays falls upon a Sunday, the Monday following shall be considered the holiday. For day workers if a holiday occurs during an employee's vacation, he/she shall receive the holiday time off at a later date. Day personnel working a 4/10 schedule will use eight hours of holiday time and two hours of vacation time to equal the ten hours off on holidays. In lieu of using eight hours of holiday time and two vacation hours on designated City holidays and the floater, the assigned Inspector may use ten vacation hours (assuming a 4-10 schedule) for each holiday and the floater. In November- December of the calendar year, the assigned Inspector may sell back unused holiday hours. C. Shift Personnel All shift employees shall be awarded 120 hours of pay each year in lieu of holidays received by other City employees. This compensation may be paid on an annual basis in November or on the first pay day in December. Employees may also take paid time off in lieu of this pay at a time mutually agreeable to both the employee and the Fire Chief. The holiday time bank is available for use in January; however, actual holiday time is earned at a rate of 10 hours per month, and is prorated based on months of service for new employees. Employees who terminate employment during the year shall receive prorated pay for the holiday time unless the time was taken in lieu of pay, and, if the employee used more holiday time than was earned, an adjustment is made to the final payout received by the employee reflecting that use. For purposes of scheduling holiday time, Firefighter/Paramedics shall schedule in such a manner that two qualified Firefighter/Paramedics are on duty 24 hours of every shift once each shift has four Firefighter/Paramedics assigned. In the interim, two Firefighter/Paramedics shall be on duty 24 hours every shift except when one Firefighter/Paramedic has a scheduled Kelly day. In this scenario, one U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 11 Packet Page 215 of 415 additional Firefighter/Paramedic, for a total of two, may be off, provided that the position is available for holiday as described in SOP 501.10. Article 15 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE A. Protective Clothing All protective clothing or protective devices required of employees in the performance of their duties shall be furnished to the employees by the Employer. B. Uniforms All uniform replacement, upkeep, cleaning, and pressing shall be provided by the Employer as per Department policy. C. Probationary Shift Employees Probationary shift employees shall be furnished five complete uniforms and all other clothing as required in the Fire Department policy and procedures as soon as reasonably possible after hiring date. Article 16 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Employees required by their supervisor to use their private automobile for Fire Department business shall be compensated at the maximum rate allowed any other City department personnel. Article 17 WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION An employee who is required to accept responsibilities and carry out the duties of a position or rank above which he/she normally holds shall be paid at eight percent above his/her normal rate of pay. A. Working Out of Class Guidelines 1. Five years with the Edmonds Fire Department. 2. To serve as an Acting Company Officer the employee has been grand- fathered to act out of class as a Company Officer as of October 20, 2003 or has successfully completed the requirements in SOP 301.02 Acting Company Officer Program. Employees may begin the program after completing four years of employment with the Edmonds Fire Department. 3. Acting pay will be paid on a pro-rated hourly rate for hours worked in excess of five hours in the upgraded position. If it exceeds five hours, all hours will be paid retroactive to the first hour. 4. Acting Battalion Chiefs must be a current Company Officer with the Edmonds Fire Department. To serve as an Acting Battalion Chief the employee has U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 12 Packet Page 216 of 415 been grand-fathered to act out of class as a Battalion Chief as of February 25, 2004 or has successfully completed the requirements in SOP 301.03 Acting Battalion Chief Program. Company Officers may begin the program after completing one year as a Company Officer with the Edmonds Fire Department. B. Firefighter/Paramedic Field Training Officer (FTO) Assignment 1. The City and the Union agree that the Firefighter/Paramedic Field Training Officer position does not constitute a class as defined by the Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations. The FTO appears in this article because even though not a class, the parties identify it as an appropriate location in the agreement to address this assignment. 2. In order to be eligible to serve as a FTO the employee has: a. Completed three years of service with the Edmonds Fire Department as a Firefighter/Paramedic, or served as a Medic Seven Paramedic. b. Received prior approval to serve as a FTO from the Edmonds Fire Department Medical Program Director, Medical Services Administrator, and Fire Chief or his/her designee. 3. Compensation for performing the FTO assignment is five percent above his/her normal rate of pay on a per diem basis. 4. The parties recognize that on certain shifts there may be no FTO assignment due to lack of eligibility. Article 18 SICK LEAVE A. LEOFF II Employees LEOFF II Shift employees shall receive sick leave accruals at the rate of 16 hours for each full calendar month of continuous service. The maximum accumulation of sick leave shall be 49 shifts for shift personnel. Day personnel shall accrue sick leave at the rate of eight hours per month up to a maximum accumulation of 1,000 hours. Sick leave accrued but not used up to a maximum of 960 hours shall be payable to the employee based on the following percentages of the employee’s regular pay rate in effect as of his/her honorable termination or death, except duty- related death or disability, which will be paid at 100 percent of the employee’s actual accrual total up to 49 shifts. Percent Resignation with two weeks notice 25 Termination by layoff 25 Termination for retirement/death 50 U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 13 Packet Page 217 of 415 New employees when hired will be given a sick leave bank of 384 hours. This paid leave may not be used for a Family Medical Leave unless approved by the employer. This bank will not grow until the employee has completed his/her second year of employment. After the second year, new employees will begin to accumulate sick leave at the regular accrual rate of sixteen 16 hours per month as stated above. New employees that leave before two years of service receive 25 percent of the unused sick time based on an accrual of 16 hours per month. In the event of the death of an employee, payment for all unused sick leave shall be made to the spouse or the employee’s estate. For purposes of this article “spouse” shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is in a domestic partnership which has been registered with the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. Retirement, in addition to its usual meaning, shall include those employees with 20 or more years of service credit within the LEOFF system who choose to end their employment with the Employer on a voluntary, honorable basis even though the employee has not yet attained LEOFF II retirement age. B. Use of Sick Leave Accrued sick leave may be used for: 1. The employee’s own illness, injury or disability including disability due to pregnancy or childbirth. 2. The need to care for a child under 18 years of age, or an older child incapable of self-care, with a health condition requiring treatment or supervision. Employees shall return to duty on a scheduled work day as soon as a qualified person is able to assume caregiver responsibilities or the child is capable of self-care. 3. The need to care for the employee’s spouse, parent, parent-in-law, or grandparent with a serious health condition or emergency condition. 4. Medical or dental appointments for the employee or a dependent child, provided that the employee receives the advance approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee; and further provided the employee must make reasonable efforts to schedule such appointments at times when they will not interfere with scheduled work days. Employees receiving advance approval to use sick leave for a medical or dental appointment for a dependent child shall return to duty on a scheduled work day as soon as the appointment is concluded and the dependent child is in the care of a qualified caregiver or the child is capable of self-care. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 14 Packet Page 218 of 415 5. Bereavement Leave In the event of a death in the employee’s immediate family, to include spouse, children, step children, mother, father, brother, sister, grandparents, grandchildren, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, and step relations the Fire Chief or his/her designee shall upon request grant the employee bereavement leave with pay. The maximum bereavement leave shall be 48 hours or two shifts for shift employees; provided however, in the event of unusual circumstances or if travel is involved to attend the funeral, additional time off may be granted. Additional time not to exceed 24 hours or one shift may be deducted from the employee’s sick leave account. Day personnel shall receive three work days bereavement leave with an additional three days charged to sick leave as stated above. 6. Family Medical Leave Eligible employees are entitled to the full benefit and protection of the State and Federal Family Medical Leave and Pregnancy Disability laws. The certificate of a physician and/or written report concerning the need for the duty sick leave may be required by the Employer in order to qualify for duty sick leave with pay that is signed by the physician that treated the illness and authorized the time off, and that states the nature of the condition, duration of the period that the employee will be incapacitated, and the date the employee can return to work. C. Worker's Compensation Offset If an employee is entitled to Worker's Compensation benefits and is simultaneously on sick leave, the employee shall apply for Worker's Compensation and turn over all compensation received to the Employer so that the combination of sick leave and other benefits available will permit the employee to retain his/her normal pay. D. Sick Leave Incentive Each successive year of this Agreement each employee who qualifies for a Sick Leave Incentive during the previous calendar year shall receive additional vacation hours to be taken in the following year as specified below: ~ 24 hours vacation time if 0 through 24 hours of sick leave are used, ~ 12 hours vacation time if 25 through 48 hours of sick leave are used. Day personnel shall receive sick leave incentive as vacation hours based on the shift personnel conversion formula in Article 10 - A1 as it applies above. This sick leave incentive plan excludes sick leave used for on-the-job injuries covered by Labor and Industries. Article 19 LAYOFF AND RECALL The Employer may conduct a layoff, also known as a personnel reduction or a reduction in force, because of a shortage of funds, lack of work, or material reorganization of the U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 15 Packet Page 219 of 415 Fire Department. And, a layoff may cause a reduction in rank for employees that remain with the Department. Conversely, a recall of laid off employees, within the time duration and conditions described below, provide an opportunity for laid off employees to return to work, and employees reduced in rank to assume their former rank. Provided, however, that should the Employer at any time determine that based upon shortage of funds, lack of work, or material reorganization of the Fire Department a layoff or reduction in force may be required, the Employer shall provide as much advance notice as possible to the Union in order to allow the Union to bargain both the decision to layoff or reduce the number of personnel and the impact of such decision upon the Union and all bargaining unit employees except those serving in an assigned position. A. Layoff – In the event of a reduction in force, the Employer shall give notice at least two weeks in advance to any employee before layoff. Employee(s) with the least Department seniority shall be laid off first. Should the reduction in force necessitate any reduction in rank for remaining personnel, the last Officer(s) promoted in the rank(s) affected shall be the first to be reduced. Reduction in rank will be based on the time in grade (classification). B. Recall – In the event of a recall, the last employee laid off shall be the first employee recalled. No new employee shall be hired until all laid off employees have been given an opportunity to return to work. This obligation shall expire 24 months after such layoff, or after such time as the Employer is unable to contact the employee being recalled on each of 10 consecutive business days, whichever occurs first. Recall to employment shall, at the discretion of the Employer, be subject to the recalled employee successfully passing a medical, psychological, and physical examinations. Such examinations shall be scheduled by and at the expense of the Employer. The recalled employee shall not be compensated for any examinations that are conducted prior to re-employment. C. If the recalled employee passes the examinations required by the Employer, the recalled employee shall be allowed to give a maximum of two weeks notice to their current employer before reporting for duty. The employee on layoff status is responsible for keeping the Employer notified of the address, telephone number, and hours at which he/she can be contacted. Prior to attempting to contact an employee to be recalled, the Employer shall notify the Union. D. Employees recalled from layoff status shall be returned in order of their seniority within the Department to any classification that has an opening for which that employee qualifies by training or experience. An Officer reduced in rank shall be reinstated to the same position, without further promotional testing, if and when a vacancy exists. For purposes of seniority, all continuous service time immediately preceding the layoff will be considered. E. Employees reduced in rank while in a probationary status shall serve the remainder of the probationary period upon assumption of their previous rank. Employees laid off while in an entry-level probationary status will serve the entire probationary period upon their return to work. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 16 Packet Page 220 of 415 Article 20 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Grievances or disputes that may arise, including the interpretation of this Agreement, shall be settled in the following manner: The Union grievance committee, upon receiving a written and signed petition of a member or members, shall determine if a grievance exists. In their opinion, if no grievance exists, no further action is necessary. The member or grievance committee must file within 30 calendar days of knowledge of violation unless the Union and the Employer agree to an extension. If the committee deems a grievance does exist they shall, with or without the employee, present this grievance to the Fire Chief for adjustment. If the grievance has not been settled within ten business days, it shall then be submitted to the Mayor's designee for adjustment. The Mayor or his/her representative shall submit a written decision within ten business days. If the grievance is not settled satisfactorily, either party shall give notice within ten business days to the other party of their intent to submit the grievance to arbitration. A representative of the Union and the Employer shall meet within ten business days and attempt to agree on a single arbitrator. If unable to reach agreement they shall request a list of 11 arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (“FMCS”). The list shall be limited to arbitrators who are members of the National Academy of Arbitrators from the Washington and/or Oregon sub-regions. Within ten business days of receipt of same, the parties shall alternately strike the names of the arbitrators until only one name remains, who shall hear the dispute. The party striking first will be the loser of the flip of a coin. The arbitrator shall render his/her decision within 30 calendar days after a hearing. The arbitrator shall have no power to render a decision that will add to, subtract from, alter, change, or modify the terms of this Agreement, and his/her power shall be limited to interpretation or application of the express terms of this agreement, and all other matters shall be excluded from arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties; provided that the decision does not involve action by the arbitrator beyond his or her jurisdiction. Each party shall pay the compensation and expenses for its own representatives and witnesses, including attorney’s fees. The parties will share equally the costs and expenses of the arbitrator. Any disputes arising under this Agreement shall be settled as stated in this Article provided that no employee shall avail themselves of this Article if they appeal a dispute to the Civil Service Commission. Any bargaining unit member who is the subject of disciplinary action including oral or written reprimand and who feels such action is improper may complain to the Union and may elect to pursue a grievance regarding disciplinary action through the grievance procedure of this Article or through the Civil Service Commission but not both. Time limits within the grievance procedure may be waived or extended by mutual agreement of both parties. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 17 Packet Page 221 of 415 Article 21 SAVINGS CLAUSE If any provision of this Agreement, or the application of such provision, should be rendered or declared invalid by any court action or by reason of any existing or subsequently enacted legislation, the remaining parts or portions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Article 22 PICKET LINE It shall not be a violation of this Agreement or grounds for discipline or discharge for an employee to refuse to cross a legal picket line in the performance of his/her duties, provided that said picket line is sanctioned by Local 1828 International Association of Firefighters. An employee may not refuse to cross any picket line when his/her duties entail the preservation and/or safety of life and/or property. Article 23 SUPERVISORY DUTIES Employees covered under this Agreement may at times, and in some cases may at all times, perform some of the duties of the supervisor. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way interfere with carrying out said supervisory duties. Article 24 STRIKES During the life of this Agreement there shall be no strikes or refusal to perform official duties and there shall be no lockouts. Article 25 MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS The benefits mutually conferred by this Agreement shall be maintained for the term thereof, notwithstanding increases for the cost of such level of benefits that may occur beyond the control of the parties hereto. This article will not apply to the January 1, 2009 prescription formulary increases for Regence Plan A. Article 26 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS The Union recognizes the Employer’s prerogative to operate and manage its affairs in all respects in accordance with its responsibilities, powers, and authority, and to determine the methods, means, and personnel by which such responsibilities are to be performed, provided that the exercise of such authority is not otherwise contrary to the terms of this Agreement or established past practices. The Employer has the right to discipline or discharge for just cause or to reduce personnel in accordance with the provisions of the City of Edmonds Civil Service Laws and Rules. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 18 Packet Page 222 of 415 Article 27 FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT All contract provisions of this Agreement that are not specifically prohibited by the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the "Act") shall be honored during the term of this Agreement, provided, however: A. That when the hours for any employee reach the maximum established by the Fair Labor Standards Act as the appropriate threshold for the payment of overtime, that all hours worked in excess of that threshold shall be paid at the rate of one and one-half (1.5) times the regular rate of pay as determined in accordance with the Act. B. That nothing herein shall be interpreted to require the pyramiding of wage categories above the regular rate of pay. In the event that the contract shall provide for the payment of an overtime rate of pay, that is, any rate one and one- half (1.5) times the regular rate of pay at a contract threshold less than that established by the Act, that rate shall be deemed to be the overtime rate of pay shall not be again multiplied by the overtime rate established by the Act. Article 28 SAFETY COMMITTEE The Employer and Union agree that Fire Department safety standards are of mutual concern. There shall be a Department Safety Committee composed of two Employer and two Union representatives. The Union representatives shall be selected by the Union. The committee shall make recommendations to the Employer relating to safety standards. The Committee’s recommendations shall not diminish the Employer's exclusive right and responsibility to take such action as it deems necessary and/or appropriate. Article 29 SENIORITY Seniority shall be determined by continuous service in the Edmonds Fire Department, calculated from the date of employment. Continuous service shall be broken only by resignation or discharge other than layoff. Employees with the same date of employment shall be assigned to the Seniority List in order of their ranking on the Civil Service Eligibility List. Article 30 ASSIGNMENT DURING TEMPORARY DISABILITY If an employee becomes temporarily disabled off duty and cannot function as a Firefighter, when mutually acceptable, the Fire Chief or his/her designee may assign the employee to a light duty assignment not to exceed six months. During the light duty assignment, the employee shall continue to receive his/her normal compensation, benefits, and seniority. Benefits shall be adjusted per Article 10 for a temporary assignment to day shift that exceeds two weeks. If an employee becomes temporarily disabled through an on the job injury and cannot function as a Firefighter, the Fire Chief or his/her designee may assign the employee to a light duty assignment for a period not to exceed six months after authorization by the U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 19 Packet Page 223 of 415 employee’s physician and/or a determination of work suitability by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries. During the light duty assignment, the employee shall continue to receive his/her normal compensation, benefits, and seniority. Benefits shall be adjusted per Article 10 for a temporary assignment to day shift that exceeds two weeks. Article 31 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS A. This Agreement and any and all Amendments and Modifications hereafter entered into and executed by and between the parties hereto, shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective successors and assigns and any other governmental entity succeeding to the City of Edmonds' obligations there under. B. In the event of any merger, consolidation, annexation or contracting for fire protection services with any other governmental agency by the City of Edmonds, either party shall have the right to reopen this Agreement for negotiation of any positions affected by the merger, consolidation, or annexation. Article 32 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN, PARAMEDIC 1. Emergency Medical Technician A. As a condition of employment, all Fire Department employees who are required to respond to medical emergencies shall maintain State of Washington Department of Health, EMS, and Trauma Systems certification as an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT), and meet State standards and local standards established by the Snohomish County Medical Program Director and the Fire Department Medical Program Director. B. The Employer will provide all books, tuition, instructors’ fees, materials, licensing fees, etc. that are required to maintain EMT certification, and to meet State and local standards. C. The Employer will make available to employees, either on duty or at an overtime rate, training required to maintain EMT certification up to current State and local standards. D. Employees having difficulty maintaining certification shall be given, on Employer time, counseling, additional on-duty study time, and/or reasonable support to maintain the EMT certification. E. Employees who lose their EMT certification following reasonable efforts by the Employer as listed in Sections B, C, and D above may be subject to disciplinary action including termination. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 20 Packet Page 224 of 415 2. Emergency Medical Technician - Paramedic A. As a condition of employment, all Firefighter/Paramedics who are required to respond to medical emergencies shall maintain certification from the State of Washington Department of Health, EMS and Trauma Systems as an EMT- Paramedic, and meet State standards and local standards established by the Snohomish County Medical Program Director and the Fire Department Medical Program Director. B. The Employer will provide all books, tuition, instructors’ fees, materials, and licensing fees, etc. that are required to maintain certification, and to meet State and local standards. C. The Employer will make available to Firefighter/Paramedics, either on duty or at the overtime rate, training required to maintain certification to current State and local standards. D. Firefighter/Paramedics having difficulty maintaining certification shall be given, on Employer time, counseling, additional on-duty study time, and/or reasonable support to maintain the certification. E. Firefighter/Paramedics who lose their certification following reasonable efforts by the Employer as listed in Sections B, C, and D above may be subject to disciplinary action including termination. Article 33 LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The Employer and the Union agree to establish a Labor Management Committee to facilitate discussions regarding matters of mutual interest. The Committee shall consist of Union Officers and Fire Administration. Meetings may be called by either party at a mutually acceptable time. Article 34 DRIVERS LICENSE CHECKS At least Annually the Employer will visually check each member’s employee’s Washington State driver’s license to ensure validity. Employees are required to notify Fire Administration, their Shift Battalion Chief, or immediate supervisor (Assistant Chief or Fire Marshal) if his/her driver’s license has been suspended or revoked. Failure to notify Fire Administration, the employee’s Shift Battalion Chief, or immediate supervisor immediately upon notice of suspension or revocation may result in disciplinary action. Driving a Employer-owned vehicle or apparatus without a valid Washington State driver’s license may result in disciplinary action. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 21 Packet Page 225 of 415 ARTICLE 35 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TECHNICAL RESCUE TEAMS A.1 Snohomish County Hazardous Materials Team and Snohomish County Technical Rescue Team Fire Department membership and participation in the Snohomish County Hazardous Materials Team and the Snohomish County Technical Rescue Team is at the sole discretion of the Employer. A.2 Number of Team Members The Hazardous Material Team shall have a maximum of six team members. The Technical Rescue Team shall have a maximum of 12 team members. Both teams will be comprised of members from the Operations Division unless otherwise determined by the Fire Chief. A.3 Membership The Employer has the sole right to establish and manage the membership of both teams, and all team operations as it relates to Edmonds Fire Department employees. A.4 Technical Rescue Disciplines As stated in the 1994 Edition of NFPA 1670 Technical Rescue Disciplines shall be identified as: Rope, Structural Collapse, Confined Space, Trench, and Collapse Rescue as outlined in the Snohomish County Technical Rescue Task Force Standard Operating Guidelines. A.5 Team Composition The Employer shall strive to maintain a balance of team members on each of the three shifts depending upon the number of team members. A.6 Application for Membership Individuals wishing to join the team shall submit a request in writing through the chain of command to the Program Manager and Department Coordinator responsible for management of the respective team. The request shall include prior training or experience applicable to team membership and operations. A.7 Selection Selection for team membership is made by the respective Program Manager and Department Coordinator subject to the approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. A.8 Team Membership Employees may serve on only one team. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 22 Packet Page 226 of 415 A.9 Resignation An employee wishing to discontinue team membership shall submit a written request to the Battalion Chief responsible for program management of the respective team. Acceptance of resignation requests will be at the discretion of the Fire Chief. A.10 Membership Requirements/Removal Team members that do not participate in training activities, team meetings, and/or actual responses on a regular basis shall be subject to removal from the team by the Fire Chief. Team members shall demonstrate on an annual basis their competency for team membership in the form of a written and/ or practical examination and response to emergency alarms when available and capable of doing so. Members failing to meet skills proficiency requirements shall be given a one-time retest opportunity. Members that fail the retest are removed from the team and all associated benefits are immediately terminated. The Fire Chief retains the right to remove members from the team for just cause. Any team member removed, other than through a reduction in force, may not re-apply for reinstatement for a period of two years without the approval of the Fire Chief or his/her designee. A.11 Training/Medical Compliance For hazardous materials team members, the Employer will maintain training and medical monitoring in accordance with applicable laws. All medical records will be kept confidential. A.12 Operational Guidelines Operational guidelines shall be developed by the Employer with input from team members. Final authority for adoption of operational guidelines resides with the Employer. A.13 Training The Employer shall make training available for team members to remain proficient as outlined in NFPA and regional standard operating guidelines at the Priority One Level. A.14 Recordkeeping The Employer, through the Fire Department Training Office, shall be responsible to ensure that all training, medical, and exposure records are maintained for team members. Team members shall cooperate in this effort. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 23 Packet Page 227 of 415 Article 36 35 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be effective the first day of January 2005 2008 and shall remain in full force and effect until the thirty-first day of December 2007 2010 provided, however, that this Agreement shall be subject to such change or modification as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto; provided further, however, that this Agreement shall remain in effect during the course of negotiation on a new Agreement. IN WITNESS HEREOF, we hereto attach our signatures as of this _____ day of ____________________, 2004 2008. CITY OF EDMONDS _______________________________ MAYOR Attest: LOCAL 1828, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ CITY CLERK U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 24 Packet Page 228 of 415 SUPPLEMENT to the AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDMONDS and LOCAL 1828, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS APPENDIX “A” — WAGES A.1 Pay Plan A.1.a Employees covered by this Agreement will receive wages according to the following Pay Plan. Each step represents one year of service except probationary positions for Battalion Chief, Lieutenant, and Inspector, which will be six months in duration. The Inspector rate of pay will be the same pay scale used for Lieutenants as designated below. A.1.b Pay Differentials All pay increases will be based on the Probationary Firefighter 1st Class base pay as set forth in the pay differential scale below: Probationary Firefighter 73% of Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 4th Class 79% of Firefighter 1st Class 8% above Probationary Firefighter Firefighter 3rd Class 85% of Firefighter 1st Class 8% above 4th Class Firefighter Firefighter 2nd Class 92% of Firefighter 1st Class 8% above 3rd Class Firefighter Firefighter 1st Class 100% of Firefighter 1st Class 9% above 2nd Class Firefighter Probationary Firefighter/Paramedic 112% 10% of above Probationary Firefighter Firefighter/Paramedic 4th Class 112% 10% of above Firefighter 4th Class Firefighter/Paramedic 3rd Class 112% 10% of above Firefighter 3rd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 2nd Class 112% 10% of above Firefighter 2nd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 1st Class 112% 10% of above Firefighter 1st Class Probationary Lieutenant 108% of Firefighter 1st Class Lieutenant 115% of Firefighter 1st Class 5% above Probationary Lieutenant Captain 122% of Firefighter 1st Class 9% above Lieutenant Probationary Battalion Chief 125% Above Firefighter 1st Class 10% above Lieutenant U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 25 Packet Page 229 of 415 Battalion Chief 2nd Class 4.5% above Probationary Battalion Chief Battalion Chief 1st Class 135% of Firefighter 1st Class 4.5% above Battalion Chief 2nd Class A.2 2005 2008 Wage Rates Effective January 1, 2005 2008 the Probationary Firefighter 1st Class rate of pay shall be set forth within Section A.2 as follows which reflects a 4 7.5% percent increase of the 2004 2007 rate. The following pay scale reflects monthly base pay: SHIFT PERSONNEL Probationary Firefighter 3729 4263 Firefighter 4th Class 4027 4613 Firefighter 3rd Class 4349 4963 Firefighter 2nd Class 4697 5372 Firefighter 1st Class 5120 5839 Probationary Firefighter/Paramedic 4102 4774 Firefighter/Paramedic 4th Class 4430 5167 Firefighter/Paramedic 3rd Class 4784 5559 Firefighter/Paramedic 2nd Class 5167 6017 Firefighter/Paramedic 1st Class 5632 6540 Probationary Lieutenant 5530 6307 Lieutenant 5807 6715 Captain 6330 7124 Probationary Battalion Chief 6388 7299 Battalion Chief 2nd Class 6675 Battalion Chief 1st Class 6975 7883 A.2.a 2006 2009 Wage Rates Effective January 1, 2006 2009 the Probationary Firefighter 1st Class rate of pay shall be increased as set forth within Section A.2 as follows: a 3 percent increase of the 2005 rate. 100 percent of the percentage rate of change in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton CPI-U for the period of June 1, 2007 through June 1, 2008. All other ranks will increase as set forth in A.1.b. A.2.b 2007 2010 Wage Rates Effective January 1, 2007 2010 the Probationary Firefighter 1st Class rate of pay shall be increased as set forth within Section A.2 as follows: a 3 percent increase of the 2006 rate. 100 percent of the percentage rate of change in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton CPI-U for the period of June 1, 2008 through June 1, 2009. All other ranks will increase as set forth in A.1.b. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 26 Packet Page 230 of 415 A.3 Time in Grade Increases and Classifications A.3.a Time in grade increases to the next higher step shall be made after an employee is paid at a given pay step for one full year except as stated in A.1 above. If the completion of such year occurs at other than the beginning of a semimonthly pay period, the increase shall be effective at the beginning of the next semimonthly pay period. A.3.b Promotional reclassification shall be at least to the next higher salary step on the Pay Plan as described in section A.1.b and A.3.c. Demotion reclassification shall be to the step in the same year of longevity the employee had prior to demotion to the lower classification. A.3.c Position Classification. For the three year duration of this agreement, position classification shall be: Position Grade Battalion Chief 1st Class Battalion Chief 2nd Class Probationary Battalion Chief Captain Lieutenant Probationary Lieutenant Inspector (Assignment) Probationary Inspector (Assignment) Firefighter/Paramedic 1st Class Firefighter/Paramedic 2nd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 3rd Class Firefighter/Paramedic 4th Class Probationary Firefighter/Paramedic Firefighter 1st Class Firefighter 2nd Class Firefighter 3rd Class Firefighter 4th Class Probationary Firefighter A.4 Tuition Reimbursement Tuition reimbursement for classes listed in A.7.a will be covered at 100% of the cost based on an annual budget limit equal to $1,500 per employee. A.5 Longevity Pay An employee shall receive in addition to his/her monthly rate of pay set forth within Section A.2, as further amended by Section A.3 and all subsequent wage increases, monthly Longevity Pay in accordance with the following: SENIORITY MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY At the completion of: 6 years 2% of employee's monthly rate of pay U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 27 Packet Page 231 of 415 12 years 4% of employee's monthly rate of pay 18 years 6% of employee's monthly rate of pay 24 years 8% of employee’s monthly rate of pay A.6 Physical Fitness Pay An employee who has completed the new hire probationary period for the position and fulfills the Physical Fitness Standards set forth within Appendix "B" shall receive in addition to his/her monthly rate of pay set forth within Section A.2, as further amended by Section A.3 and all subsequent wage increases, monthly Physical Fitness Pay equal to one and one-half percent (1.5%) of the afore- referenced monthly rate of pay. A.76 Education Pay An employee who has completed the new hire probationary period for the position and elects to waive the Longevity Pay set forth within Section A.5 shall receive in addition to his/her monthly rate of pay set forth within Section A.2, as further amended by Section A.3 and all subsequent wage increases, monthly Education Pay in accordance with the following: JOB-RELATED COLLEGE CREDITS MONTHLY EDUCATION PAY AA Degree or 90 Credits 2% of employee's monthly rate of pay 135 Credits 4% of employee's monthly rate of pay BA/BS Degree 6% of employee's monthly rate of pay A.76.a Job-related college credits shall mean all credits within the fields of study listed below and also accepted by a nationally accredited college or university recognized by the United States Department of Education. Members currently receiving any educational incentive pay will continue their eligibility for educational pay. Fields of Study Fire Science Fire Investigation/Inspection Fire Administration Fire Engineering Business Administration Public Administration Emergency Medical Services Registered Nurse Health and Safety Management A.76.b Once each 12 months an employee may elect to change compensation plans from Education to Longevity or from Longevity to Education. If an employee elects Education Pay, the portion of the Education Pay equal to the Longevity Pay that the employee had the option to elect to receive shall be considered as Longevity Pay. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 28 Packet Page 232 of 415 It is the responsibility of the employee electing to go from Education Pay to Longevity Pay or from Longevity Pay to Education Pay to initiate the change request in writing to Fire Administration. A.7 Special Operations Pay – Hazardous Material and Technical Rescue Hazardous Materials Team or Technical Rescue Team Members shall have added to their base pay a premium of two percent of Firefighter 1st Class base monthly pay upon technical certification(s) as established for full hazardous materials team membership or full technical rescue team membership as determined by the Fire Chief. Administration and operations of the two teams is addressed in Article 35. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 29 Packet Page 233 of 415 APPENDIX “B” — HEALTH AND WELLNESS PROGRAM Appendix B is supplemental to the Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Local 1828, International Association of Firefighters, covering the period from January 1, 2005 2008 through December 31, 2007 2010 as modified. It is understood and agreed by and between the undersigned parties pursuant to Appendix A.6 of to the current labor agreement between the parties signatories hereto, the following shall serve as a controlling document with respect to the maintenance of a Health and Wellness Program and the procedures by which the aforementioned program shall be administered. A. There is an Advisory Committee made up of one Union member from each shift, the physician, the consultant, and the Fire Chief or his/her designee. The Advisory Committee will advise the City and the Union concerning any proposed changes in the tests and procedures used in the Health and Wellness Program. B. The medical fitness profile as set forth in Exhibit 1 of this Appendix shall be mandatory (payable at the overtime rate) and be administered by the Advisory Committee's designated physician herein referred to as the physician. C. Special tests shall be devised for the employees who have physical handicaps or limitations that interfere with the ability to do one or more of the regular test procedures. D. Following the medical fitness profile, each employee shall be encouraged to commence on a voluntary physical conditioning program. E. Following the conditioning program, Fire Department employees may submit to the Physical Fitness Agility Test set forth in Exhibit 2 of the Appendix or modification thereof pursuant to Section C of the Appendix. F.E.Exhibit 3 2 of this Appendix outlines the schedule for both the Medical Fitness Profile and the Physical Agility Test. If any portion of the test is failed, the entire test shall be retaken because the test is interrelated. Section H covers retake. G. The Physical Agility Test is administered beginning in the fall after the physician- provided Medical Fitness Profile. Retakes may be scheduled through the end of the year. Members who qualify in the fall receive physical agility fitness premium pay. from January 1 through December 31 of the following year. H. Retakes may be scheduled through the end of the year. Members who qualify before the end of the year receive physical agility fitness premium pay from January 1 through December 31 of the following year. I. The Physical Fitness Agility Test will be performed by employees to qualify for Incentive Pay and the test will be administered by a Fire Department Health and Wellness Committee member. Updates to the Physical Agility Test recommended by the Health and Wellness Committee may be implemented if U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 30 Packet Page 234 of 415 mutually agreed upon between the Employer and the Union. Exercise and conditioning shall be on an individual and voluntary basis without compensation. J.F. All employees covered by this Appendix who are classified as Firefighters Act II (LEOFF II) employees shall be protected against loss of pay for time off work due to any injury sustained while participating in sanctioned conditioning programs at Edmonds Fitness or in the Fire Station environment. Should any LEOFF II employee become disabled due to an injury of the aforementioned nature, the Employer shall compensate the employee for all time off work beyond the depletion of any accrued sick leave benefits until such time as the employee shall have begun to receive State Disability Benefits, provided that the Employer will receive credit for any other employment or disability benefits received by the employee during that time. G. During year one of the agreement (2008) the Employer and the Union agree to develop a mandatory physical fitness program. If a mandatory physical fitness program mutually acceptable to both parties is developed and formally adopted by December 31, 2008, one percent will be added to 1st Class Firefighter pay beginning January 1, 2009. An additional one percent will be added to 1st Class Firefighter pay beginning January 1, 2010. EXHIBIT 1 TO APPENDIX "B" MEDICAL FITNESS PROFILE Description of Medical Fitness Profile: 1. Treadmill This exercise tolerance test is one of the most sensitive tests available to establish or rule out evidence of coronary artery diseases. It is useful to determine exercise capacity and to rule out any complicating factors that might be related to starting an exercise program. The treadmill test consists of a series of three-minute stages, starting out at a slow, 1.7 miles-per-hour walk with a 10 percent grade and increasing in speed and grade every three minutes until the subject reaches his/her maximum level of exertion. The standard protocol developed by Dr. Bruce at the University of Washington is used for this test so that the subject’s results can be compared to others of the same age and sex. The subject’s blood pressure will be monitored every three minutes throughout the test. Continuous EKG monitoring can be done while on the treadmill. The subject will continue walking until he/she has reached the maximum determined by his/her own symptoms, such as shortness of breath, or until directed to stop by the administrator based on the findings on the ECG monitor or other physical examination, blood pressure, and ECG monitoring. The subject will continue walking throughout a recovery period of six minutes. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 31 Packet Page 235 of 415 2. Blood Profile A sample of blood will be taken at testing by a registered nurse. From this sample a battery of laboratory tests will be performed to determine levels of specific chemicals in the blood stream. These figures will be compared to normal values (usually presented as a range of values). If large discrepancies exist between subject’s values and the normal range values, it is recommend that the subject seek his/her physician's advice. Some interesting values to note are cholesterol and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) levels. The level of cholesterol will indicate how much cholesterol is circulating in the blood stream; high cholesterol levels have been linked to atherosclerosis. Higher HDL percentages are also thought to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis. 3. Body Composition Measurement Body composition measurement determines the relative percentages of different body tissues and compartments. The most commonly requested information is the percentage of body fat. Body composition can be measured by using many methods. Some of the most common methods include Hydrostatic weighing (dunk tank), skin caliper, height/weight charts, and a new method that determines body composition through electrical impedance. This profile will employ the electrical impedance method, specifically the RJL BIA-103 impedance systems because of its high reliability and ease of measurement. A recent study indicated that this method had a .99 reliability coefficient and when compared to other methods of body composition it has been shown to provide accurate measurement. Because the equipment measures total body water, any fluctuations in body fluids will result in erroneous results. Therefore, it is important to follow the guidelines below. Subject should not: a. eat for four-to-five hours prior to test b. exercise for 12 hours prior to test c. consume alcoholic beverages for 24 hours prior to test d. be on diuretic medication. 4. Pulmonary Function Screen This test measures forced vital capacity and percentage exhaled in the first second along with other ratios and a plotted curve sufficient for screening for pulmonary disease and providing baseline pulmonary function data. 5. Other Tests Any other test recommended by the Physical Fitness Advisory Committee. The Employer and Union agree to review profile elements contained in Exhibit 1 in year one of the agreement, and to align and update the medical fitness profile with U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 32 Packet Page 236 of 415 best practices during the review period, and implement changes beginning in year two (2009) of the agreement. EXHIBIT 2 TO APPENDIX "B" PHYSICAL AGILITY TEST Description of Test Events: 1. Aerobic Capacity The employee, after completion of the Medical Fitness Profile, shall complete one of the following: a. Run 1-1/2 miles within 13 minutes b. Walk 3 miles within 38 minutes c. Swim 500 yards within 8 minutes and 20 seconds d. Run in place 75 steps per minute for 15 minutes e. Run on motorized horizontal treadmill at 10 miles per hour for 6 minutes f. Climb stairs consisting of 10 steps at 9 round trips per minute for 9 minutes g. Bicycle 4 miles on flat terrain within 12 minutes. NOTE: This would test aerobic output fairly. 2. Abdominal Strength The employee will perform 35 stomach crunches within 2 minutes. 3. Upper Body Strength The employee shall complete one of the following: a. Flexed Arm Hang The employee will do a pull-up (palms away) and hold it in the up position, with chin above the bar, for a minimum of eight seconds. b. Pull-ups The employee will perform the pull-ups in standard form, keeping legs straight and completely extending arms when in the down position and bringing chin above the bar in the up position. A minimum of seven pull- ups (palms away). c. Push-ups (Standard Style) The fist of the evaluator is placed on the floor below the employee's chest. The employee must keep his/her back straight at all times and from the up position lower himself/herself to the floor until his/her chest touches the fist and then push to the up position again, repeating the exercise a minimum of 25 times. 4. Balance U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 33 Packet Page 237 of 415 The employee, given a beam secured to a level floor and measuring 20 feet long by three-to-four inches wide, and given a length of fire hose weighing at least 20 pounds, shall walk the length of the beam carrying the length of hose without falling off or stepping off the beam in the process. 5. Strength and Stamina The employee, given a weight of 125 lbs, shall lift the weight from the floor and carry the weight 100 feet without stopping. 6. Back Strength The employee, using the static floor pull machine with dynamometer gauge (designed by Stevens Health Clinic), will perform the exercise designated for the machine, one time, using an isometric lifting technique. This test is a safe evaluation of lower back strength. Successful completion of this exercise will be determined by the employee scoring within a norm range on the dynamometer gauge (previously set by past tests by the Sports Medicine Center at Stevens Hospital). Upon the employee reaching the norm range the employee will be instructed to cease immediately. The rationale for each exercise in the Physical Agility Test is found in the 1985 NFPA Code and Standards 1001, Appendix A, Sections A-2-3.1 through A-2-3.6. EXHIBIT 3 2 TO APPENDIX "B" MEDICAL FITNESS PROFILE AND PHYSICAL AGILITY TEST SCHEDULE Medical Physical Fitness Profile Fall Annual hire date anniversary Agility Test After profile Retest After agility test to end of calendar year U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 34 Packet Page 238 of 415 ADDENDUM—DRUG TESTING PROCESS The drug and alcohol testing procedures outlined in this document shall become part of the current labor Agreement between the City of Edmonds and the Edmonds Firefighters, Local 1828, IAFF. A. GENERAL 1. The City and the Union recognize that drug and alcohol use by employees is a threat to public welfare and the safety of department personnel. It is the goal of the parties to eliminate workplace drug and alcohol use through preventative education and assistance with the rehabilitative process. However, it is the City policy that: a. The illegal use of drugs and the use of alcohol at the workplace by all employees is prohibited b. Employees shall not be impaired by the use of alcohol or drugs or engaged in the illegal use of drugs at the workplace c. All employees shall behave in conformance with the requirements established under the Drug Free Work Place Act of 1988 d. Employees who engage in the illegal use of drugs or who are impaired by the use of alcohol at the workplace will be held to the same qualification standards for employment or job performance and behavior to which the entity holds its other employees, even if any unsatisfactory performance or behavior is related to the employee's drug use or alcoholism. 2. Employees shall be informed of the Drug Testing process as outlined herein. Employees who are required to take a test shall be informed of how the test is conducted, what the test determines, and what the consequences are of testing positive. New employees will be provided with this information at the time of hire. 3. Employees shall not be subject to random drug or alcohol testing, except as specified in Section 13 of this Addendum. If specific objective facts and reasonable cause, however, lead the supervisor to believe that the employee is impaired by the use of drugs or alcohol while on the job and his or her job performance would be impaired, then the City may require the employee to undergo a drug or alcohol test, as provided herein. The employee has the right to have a Union Representative or Union member designee present during the employee's submission to the testing process, provided this request does not unreasonably delay the testing process. The employee will be required to sign a Consent Form for the testing, and an unreasonable refusal to execute the consent form for a test, as specified in this addendum, shall be grounds for disciplinary action. A supervisor shall transport the employee to the testing facility and, following the test, to the employee's residence. The employee will be placed in a paid Sick Leave status until the test results are known. If the employee does not U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 35 Packet Page 239 of 415 have any sick leave available, he or she will be placed in a paid administrative leave status. If the results are negative, the employee's time will be charged to paid Administrative Leave and his sick leave will be re- instated. The records and referral will be handled in a confidential manner. 4. Employees who voluntarily come forward and ask for assistance to deal with a drug or alcohol problem will not be disciplined by the City, unless they refuse the EAP's reasonable opportunity for rehabilitative assistance or fail to successfully complete the rehabilitative program. If, within two years following an employee's voluntary request for assistance, the same employee is referred to testing under the provisions of Section 3 above and tests positive, the City may also use disciplinary action in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. B. DRUG TESTING 1. The collection and testing of urine samples shall be performed by a NIDA- certified laboratory that has been mutually agreed upon by the City and Union and identified in this Addendum. Samples collected after regular working hours and on weekends will be taken by a mutually agreed upon medical facility as also identified herein. The collection of samples, regarding security, freedom from adulteration, and chain of custody, shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the NIDA standards. Employees shall not be witnessed while submitting a urine sample. If the NIDA standards, rules, or procedures are breached or violated, the results of the test will be negative. 2. The laboratory shall test for the classes of drugs listed in the NIDA standards, using the listed initial and confirmation cutoff levels for positive readings. The initial testing shall use the immunoassay method. All specimens identified as positive on the initial test shall be confirmed using the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) technique. 3. A split sample shall be secured with each sample collection. The split sample will be preserved in the manner prescribed by the NIDA standards. In the event of a positive test result, the employee has the right to submit the reserved portion of the split sample to an independent laboratory for further confirmation testing. Confirmation testing of the split sample must be done in accordance with the processes and standards, as specified in this Addendum. Split samples from positive tests shall be retained by the laboratory for at least one year or for the duration of any grievance or legal proceedings before destruction of the sample. C. ALCOHOL TESTING 1. A Breathalyzer shall be used to screen for alcohol use. The screening shall be conducted on test equipment by an individual, both of which must be certified by the Washington State Patrol and follow their testing standards and related State legal requirements. If the test is conducted by an individual U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 36 Packet Page 240 of 415 known to the employee, the test must be witnessed by another qualified individual. A positive blood alcohol test level shall be .04 percent or more. 2. Tests resulting in a positive reading on the Breathalyzer shall be confirmed shortly thereafter by a standard Blood Alcohol test. The test shall be conducted by the nearest State qualified medical laboratory or hospital, as mutually agreed upon by the City and Union and identified in this Addendum. Test samples, including split samples, shall be treated with the same degree of security and shall use the same chain of custody procedures as provided in this Addendum for drug sample tests. Test results shall be considered positive when the blood alcohol exceeds .04 percent or more. Test results below .04 percent shall be considered negative. D. MEDICAL REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION 1. The Medical Review Physician shall be chosen and agreed upon between the Union and the City and must be a licensed physician with a knowledge of substance abuse disorders. The Medical Review Physician shall be familiar with the characteristics of the test (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value), the laboratory running the test, and the employee’s medical conditions and exposures. The role of the Medical Review Physician will be to review and interpret the positive test results. The physician must examine alternate medical explanations for any positive test results. This action shall include conducting a medical interview with the affected employee, a review of the employee's medical history, and a review of any other relevant biomedical factors. The Medical Review Physician shall conduct his or her review in full accordance with the NIDA standards. The physician shall determine whether the test results are valid or invalid and shall notify the City and the employee of his/her decision. E. TEST RESULTS 1. The City will treat the employee's test results as confidential. The City shall pay for the initial testing, including the physician. If the employee elects to have the split sample tested, the employee must pay for that test. However, if, as a result of the split sample test, it can be proven that the initial test resulted in a false positive, then the City will reimburse the employee the cost of the split sample test. If either the initial or subsequent split samples test negative, the laboratory will notify the City. As soon as possible, the City will notify the employee of the negative results, clear the employee of the drug or alcohol suspicion, and immediately discard the test results. F. CONSEQUENCES OF A POSITIVE TEST RESULT 1. An employee who tests positive for drugs or alcohol will be referred to the City's Employee Assistance Program. The City will provide assistance to the U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 37 Packet Page 241 of 415 extent covered by the City's employee benefit and leave policies. Discipline, if any is taken, will be based upon the employee's participation in the EAP's recommended rehabilitation program and the severity of any offenses committed while under the influence. 2. Employees who complete a rehabilitation program may be periodically tested once per quarter without notice for a two-year period. An employee who tests positive during this period will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including suspension and termination, depending upon the severity of the circumstances. Employees who complete the rehabilitation program and are released for active duty will be returned to their normal duty assignment. After three years without any further drug or alcohol violations, the employee's past related offense cannot be considered by the City in any progressive disciplinary action. Records of the violation will be removed from the employee's personnel file and sealed from the supervisor's review immediately upon reaching the end of the three-year period. G. HOLD HARMLESS 1. The drug testing program was solely initiated at the City’s request. The Union shall be held harmless and indemnified, including the costs for reasonable attorney's fees, for the violation of any employee's rights by the City arising from the administration of the testing process. H. CHANGES IN THE NIDA STANDARDS 1. The NIDA standards that are referenced in this Addendum are contained in the Federal Register, Department of Health and Human Services, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, dated April 11, 1988. Should these standards be updated or changed during the life of this Agreement, the City and the Union agree that the provisions of this Addendum shall be based upon the latest NIDA standards in effect. U:FireAdmin:ExecAsst:UnionNegotiations08:2008-2010 CLA Line-Thur2/1/2008 38 Packet Page 242 of 415 AM-1384 2.H. North End Taxi License Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Approval of 2008 Taxicab Operator's License for North End Taxi. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council approve the 2007 Taxicab Operator's License for North End Taxi. Previous Council Action The City Council last approved the license for North End Taxi on January 2, 2007. Narrative Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.60 requires that the City Council approve Taxicab Operators Licenses. A copy of the application submitted by North End Taxi is attached as Exhibit 1. The Police Department has reviewed and approved the application which included background checks on the owner and drivers. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - North End Taxi Application Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/29/2008 03:54 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/29/2008 03:58 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/29/2008 03:59 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 01/29/2008 03:48 PM Final Approval Date: 01/29/2008 Packet Page 243 of 415 Packet Page 244 of 415 Packet Page 245 of 415 Packet Page 246 of 415 Packet Page 247 of 415 AM-1375 2.I. Surplus City Vehicles and Equipment Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Kim Karas Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:Consent Department:Public Works Type:Action Review Committee:Finance Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city vehicles and equipment. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that authorization be given to Public Works to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city vehicles and equipment. Previous Council Action Previously, the city has utilized the services of James Murphy Auctioneers to to sell surplus city vehicles and equipment. This has proven to be a cost effective method to manage surplus items. Narrative The following vehicles have become surplus and are the vehicles Public Works would like to auction with James G. Murphy. UNIT #Dept. DESCRIPTION SERIAL NUMBER LICENSE # 16 SWR 1994 Chev Cube Van 1GBKH32K9P3314793 14110D 100 POL 2004 Harley Davidson (Falk)1HD1FMW154Y623100 0742EX 114 SWR 1998 1-Ton Chev with Service Body 1GBJC34R6WF057612 22864D 115 WTR 1998 1-Ton Chev with Service Body 1GBJC34ROWF062935 22863D 116 SWR 1998 1-Ton Chev with Service Body 1GBJC34R8WF062780 22862D 117 WTR 1998 1-Ton Chev with Service Body 1GBJC34R9WF063579 22861D 124 POL 2004 Harley Davidson (Roth)1HD1FMW184Y623124 0593EX 189 POL 2002 GMC Sonoma 1GTCS19W628188189 35324D 233 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (PO5)2FAHP71W14X173033 37791D 234 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (Total)2FAHP71W34X173034 37790D 235 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (PO1)2FAHP71W54X173035 38339D 236 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (PO3)2FAHP71W74X173036 38340D 237 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (PO7)2FAHP71W94X173037 38341D 238 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (P10)2FAHP71W04X173038 38342D 239 POL 2004 Crown Victoria (P02)2FAHP71W24X173039 38343D 253 DET 2002 Dodge Stratus (DET) (Green)1B3AL36R22H231253 35310D 621 POL 2005 Harley Davidson (Harb)1HD1FMW115Y683621 D418EX 647 POL 1980 Flyer Bus D102351647 24944D Packet Page 248 of 415 Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2008 Revenue: $124,000 Expenditure: n/a Fiscal Impact: Proceeds from auction will be deposited into the Equipment Rental B-Fund Accounts Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 01:36 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/31/2008 01:38 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 01:52 PM APRV Form Started By: Kim Karas Started On: 01/24/2008 08:33 AM Final Approval Date: 01/31/2008 Packet Page 249 of 415 AM-1391 2.J. Revised Fiber Broadband Agreement Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Submitted For:Carl Nelson Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign revised Fiber Broadband Agreement with Edmonds School District. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of agreement. Previous Council Action Council previously approved this agreement on January 15, 2008. Narrative Edmonds School District requested that interlocal agreement language be added to the agreement. The attached agreement includes the requested changes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Revised Agreement Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 01:52 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/31/2008 01:57 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 01:59 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 01/31/2008 01:39 PM Final Approval Date: 01/31/2008 Packet Page 250 of 415 C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CHASE\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\OLK60\EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT FIBER AGREEMENT FINAL (2).DOC City of Edmonds Fiber Optic Service Interlocal Agreement with Edmonds School District This Fiber Optic Service Interlocal Agreement is entered into this ______ day of _____________, 2008, between the City of Edmonds and Edmonds School District, providing for fiber optic services to Edmonds School District by the City of Edmonds. Whereas, Chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local government units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other government entities on the basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner pursuant to forms of governmental organizations that will accord best with geographic, economic population, and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities, now therefore, The City of Edmonds (“City”) and Edmonds School District (“District”) agree as follows: 1. Findings 1.1 The City is building a high speed, broad band fiber optic network and internet connection in the City in order to provide advanced telecommunication and data management services to its various departments and to enhance city services to the public, including but not limited to water and sewer services, fire and police services, and library and park services. 1.2 The District is poised to expand its outreach to students, staff, and the community in order to advance instructional and communication goals. However, these efforts cannot be expanded adequately and efficiently without access to a second sophisticated broadband fiber network and internet connection which provides redundant connectivity. 1.3 The installation of an advanced fiber network allows the City to enjoy substantial additional capacity in the system and the opportunity to supply broad band fiber optic and internet connection services to other government institutions, such as the District, on a basis that will expand the internal communication abilities and the educational outreach of those institutions, while at the same time lowering the overall cost of the fiber optic network to the City and enhancing the robustness of the City’s fiber optic system. The Packet Page 251 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 2 of 12 additional capacity will also enable the City to expand its own usage in future years to serve City agencies and to serve the citizens of Edmonds. 2. Term 2.1 The initial term of this Agreement is five years from its effective date. 2.2 The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which the fiber optic connection is completed to the District, and the District has tested the connection by sending and receiving internet traffic at the demarcation patch panel. 2.3 At the end of the initial five-year term, either party may terminate the Agreement on ninety days’ advance written notice to the other party. 2.4 If not terminated at the end of the initial five-year term, the Agreement will extend automatically on a year to year basis. 2.5 Either party may then terminate the Agreement at the end of each successive one- year extension on ninety days’ advance written notice to the other party. 3. City Obligations The City will provide the following services (either with its own employees or through its contractors) to the District: 3.1 Install a high speed broad band fiber cable and connection to a demarcation patch panel attached to the District at the following locations: 3.1.1 ___Edmonds-Woodway High School – 7600 212th Street SW Edmonds, WA 98026________________________________________________ 3.2 Supply metering facilities capable of measuring the District’s use of the City fiber network on an industry standard basis, as described below in section 6.4.1. 3.3 Operate and maintain the City’s high speed broad band internet connection and fiber system, including the connections to demarcation patch panels at the District for a minimum of five years from the effective date of the Agreement. 3.4 Use its best efforts to provide a 99 percent standard of reliability of the network internet connection, excluding (1) one two-hour scheduled maintenance window per month between weekend hours (Friday at 9 PM – Monday at 3 AM). 3.5 Bill the District on a monthly basis on the basis of rate principles established in section 6.4. Packet Page 252 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 3 of 12 4. District Obligations In return for the services provided by the City under section 3, the District will do the following: 4.1 Provide suitable locations for installation of high speed broad band fiber cable and connections to demarcation patch panels attached to the District at the at the locations described in section 3.1. 4.2 Provide the City with access to District property to install the fiber connections and fiber optic cable, together with underground conduits should underground connections be required. 4.3 Provide the City with a procedure to rapidly obtain 24 hour a day/seven days per week access to the demarcation patch panels attached to the District at the locations described in section 3.1, and any other locations on District property over which the City fiber system is connected. 4.4 Assume full responsibility for the District’s communication systems on the District’s side of the demarcation patch panels. 4.5 Pay the City for costs and fees, within 30 days of receipt of a properly completed invoice. 5. Technical Specifications 5.1 Technical specifications of the City’s broad band fiber system and internet connection existing at the time this Agreement is entered into are described in Exhibit A, which is made a part of the Agreement. 5.2 The City reserves the option to change those specifications at any time during the term of the Agreement. 5.3 Should the specifications change, the City will attempt to inform the District of those changes at least sixty days prior to the change. However, because there may be multiple changes to the system over the term of the Agreement, the City does not guarantee that all changes in technical specifications will be provided to the District. 5.4 The District has the option at any time to request and obtain the most up to date technical specifications in the possession of the City. 6. Pricing The City will charge the District for high speed, broad band fiber optic network and internet connection under the following categories: (1) installation costs amortized over Packet Page 253 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 4 of 12 five years, (2) maintenance expenses, inclusive of any federal, state, city, or other local taxes, (3) port charges, and (4) bandwidth usage charges. 6.1 Installation The installation cost of connecting to the District will be charged to the District at cost and amortized over the initial five year term of the agreement. 6.1.1 The estimated cost of installing the fiber optic connection and demarcation patch panel at the locations specified in section 3.1 is provided in Exhibit B 6.1.2 This amount is only an estimate. The actual installation costs, which may be different, will be the amount used to calculate the amortized installation charges to the District. 6.1.3 The actual installation costs will be financed over 5 years using an interest rate of 1.5% over the State’s investment pool rate in effect at the time the agreement is adopted. This fixed monthly cost, will be charged for the first sixty months under the agreement. 6.1.4 After the first sixty months of billing under the agreement, the monthly charges for installation will cease, unless there are additional intervening installations or other capital costs agreed upon in writing by both parties. 6.2 Maintenance A charge for ongoing maintenance will be separately identified on the City’s monthly billing to the District. The components of that modest maintenance charge are: 6.2.1 Maintenance of fiber and conduits based in part on the length of connection between the connection points to the District and the City’s fiber system. 6.2.2 Maintenance of the hardware and software associated with the demarcation patch panels at the connections to the District and the metering mechanisms necessary to operate the connections to the District. 6.2.3 Proportionately allocated federal, state, and local taxes. 6.3 Port Charge A fixed monthly port charge will be billed to the District for each connection point identified above in section 3.1 and for any other connection to the District that may later be added. 6.3.1 The port charges identified in the illustrative Exhibit B will remain fixed for the initial five-year term of the Agreement. They may then be changed by the City on an annual basis provided the City gives the District 180 days’ advance written notice of changes in the monthly port charges. Packet Page 254 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 5 of 12 6.4 Bandwidth A fourth component of charges to the District will be based on bandwidth usage. 6.4.1 The City will utilize an industry standard “95th percentile” method of computing network utilization as follows: 6.4.1.1 The City will track the District’s usage in 5 minute intervals over the course of a calendar month. 6.4.1.2 The City will then sort the intervals based on usage (highest to lowest) and discard the top 5 percent of intervals for that month. 6.4.1.3 The City will then compute usage based on the highest 5 minute interval remaining after discarding the top 5 percent. 6.4.2 The District will have a choice of a minimum bandwidth price schedule or no minimum bandwidth price schedule. 6.4.2.1 The rates per mb of bandwidth usage and port charges will be lower if a minimum monthly bandwidth charge is established, regardless of the actual usage. 6.4.2.2 Minimum monthly bandwidth guarantees are available at the 10, 15, 20, 30 and 50 mb/month levels. 6.4.2.3 If a minimum monthly bandwidth is guaranteed, any higher usage by the District will be charged at the lower $/mb rate associated with that minimum guarantee level. 6.4.2.4 Should the District choose not to guarantee a minimum mb/month bandwidth, the bandwidth and port charges will be higher. Bandwidth will be based only on the actual usage during the month measured by the “95th percentile” method of computing network utilization described above in section 6.4.1. 6.4.3 The District must select a bandwidth option or a specific level of minimum bandwidth at the inception of the Agreement. 6.4.3.1 The bandwidth option initially selected by the District is outlined in Schedule B. 6.4.3.2 As the Bandwidth requirements of the District increase, the District will be able to increase their minimum bandwidth commitment in order to take advantage of the lower unit costs. The District must request modification of the billing structure in writing, and it will take effect the billing period that follows the date the notice is received plus 30 days. Packet Page 255 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 6 of 12 The District may only reduce its minimum bandwidth commitment on the annual anniversary date of the Agreement or subsequent renewals. 6.4.4 The Pricing Matrix identified in Exhibit B will remain fixed for the initial five-year term of the Agreement. After the initial five-year term, the rates may be changed by the City on an annual basis provided the City gives the District 180 days’ advance written notice of changes in bandwidth charges. 7. Notices 7.1 Notices required under this Agreement must be in writing. 7.1.1 Written notices may be delivered by hand-delivery, U.S. Mail, FedEx (or other express delivery service), fax, or e-mail. 7.1.2 Notices will be effective, however, only on the date received. 7.2 Notices to the City should be sent to the following Name Dan Clements Position Administrative Services Director Street Address 121 Fifth Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone Number 425.771.0239 e-mail address clements@ci.edmonds.wa.us 7.3 Notices to the District should be sent to the following Name Cynthia Nelson Position Technology Director Street Address 20420 68th Ave. W, Lynnwood, WA 98036 Phone Number 425-431-7337 e-mail address nelsonc@edmonds.wednet.edu 7.4 The designated recipients for written notices may be changed at any time during the Agreement, so long as the change is delivered to the other party in writing. 8. Successors and Assigns 8.1 This Agreement may be assigned by either party to a successor or assign, provided the other party agrees in writing. 8.2 Approval of a request for transfer to a successor or assign must not be unreasonably withheld. 9. Limitation of Liability Packet Page 256 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 7 of 12 9.1 The City has no responsibility for any data loss or any other consequential damages that may result from the failure, interruption or poor performance of its high speed, broad band fiber optic network and internet connection. 9.2 The only remedy available to the District as a result of the failure, interruption, or poor performance of the City’s high speed, broad band fiber optic network and internet connection is the reduction of City charges proportional to the time of the failure, interruption, or poor performance. 9.3 There are no third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement. 10. Indemnity and Insurance 10.1 The City and the District mutually indemnify each other for any losses or other claims arising from the operation and maintenance of the City’s high speed broad band internet connection and fiber system during the term of this Agreement, unless the loss or claim is caused solely by either the City or the District, in which case that party will be solely responsible. 10.2 The District shall provide a Certificate of Coverage evidencing: Commercial General, Automobile and Errors & Omissions Liability coverage written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. 11. Integration 11.1 This Agreement represents the complete agreement between the City and the District relating to the installation, maintenance and operation of the City’s high speed broad band internet connection and fiber system. 11.2 The Agreement integrates within it all prior discussions and drafts. 11.3 No amendment to the Agreement will be valid, unless it is in the form of a written amendment that specifically amends or specifically supersedes this Agreement. 12. Severability 12.1 If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, those provisions will be severed from the Agreement and the obligations of the parties will continue under the remaining terms of the Agreement. 12.2 If a court of competent jurisdiction finds this Agreement to be beyond the legal authority of the City to provide internet broadband services on a service contract basis, the parties agree to enter into an interlocal agreement providing for a joint arrangement to Packet Page 257 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 8 of 12 provide each government with its own internal communication under the unified management and operation of the City in accordance with the provisions of this service agreement. 13. Force Majeure The parties to this Agreement will be not be required to carry out its terms during a period when either party is prevented from doing so by a force majeure event including natural disasters such as windstorms and earthquakes, terrorist attacks or other public safety emergencies, and injunctions or other court orders. 14 Dispute Resolution 14.1 It is not anticipated that any significant disputes will arise in the course of this Agreement. If disputes do arise, however, they will be handled as follows: 14.1.1 The first step will be for the Mayor of the City and the Superintendent of the District to meet in an attempt to resolve the dispute. 14.1.2 If the Mayor of the City and the Superintendent of the District are unable to resolve the problem within two weeks of meeting, the City Council of the City and the School Board of the District will be asked to convene a special joint meeting to address the issue. 14.1.3 If within two weeks after meeting in joint session, the City Council of the City and the School Board of the District are together unable to resolve the dispute, the Mayor of the City and the Superintendent of the District will meet to agree on a mediator for a binding resolution who will be hired to convene the parties within thirty days. The cost of the mediator will be shared equally by the City and the District. If he Mayor of the City and the Superintendent of the District cannot agree on a mediator, a mediator will be appointed by the presiding judge of Snohomish County Superior Court, with the cost of arbitration born equally. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Packet Page 258 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 9 of 12 Agreement Approved: DATED THIS ________ DAY OF _____________________, 20____. CITY OF EDMONDS Mayor Gary Haakenson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: By: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney Edmonds School District Signature on behalf of Edmonds School District: Printed Name: Marla S. Miller Title: Assistant Superintendent, Business and Operations Date: Packet Page 259 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 10 of 12 EXHIBIT A Interface Specifications and Requirements General Background 1. The Edmonds Fiber Network (EFN) was initially established in 2005 with the installation of a 24 strand backbone running from Hwy 99 west to the vicinity of the ferry dock in downtown Edmonds. There are numerous splice loops along the route and the City has a patch panel located in the Public Safety Building in downtown Edmonds and at the Public Works facility near the intersection of 212th and Hwy 99. This segment is referred to as the “City Backbone Segment”. 2. The City backbone was augmented in 2006 with and additional of 24 strands running from the Public Works facility, south under Hwy 99 to the King Snohomish County boundary near 238th. This segment is known as the “Hwy 99 Segment”. 3. Late in 2006, the City purchased six strands of fiber from the Seattle Fiber consortium running from the King- Snohomish County Boundary (238th) south to the Westin building in Seattle where it interconnects with a multi-homed Tier 1 ISP. The part of the network is known as the “Seattle Segment”. 4. Early in 2007, the City connected the Seattle Segment to 6 strands of the Hwy 99 segment which is now collectively known as the “Westin Segment”. 5. In August of 2007, the City installed a redundant Cisco 65xx switching fabric to interconnect the City Backbone with the Westin Segment to provide the City and certain Public, Education & Government (PEG) partners with high speed access to the internet as well as the State of Washington Inter-Governmental Network (IGN). 6. The Edmonds Public Works facility serves as the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC), and has substantial battery back-up as well as a large scale diesel generator installation that will provide continuous power in the event of a long term power outage. 7. Should the Westin Segment experience an outage, the EFN has an alternate physical route available to the internet that will automatically pick-up the traffic. The City also plans to have an alternate route to the internet through a provider not located in Seattle to provide non-stop connectivity in the event a catastrophic failure were to occur at the Westin facility. 8. All segments utilize single mode (SM) fiber. 9. Current City and Partner connections are both 2 fiber full duplex as well as single fiber full duplex. All new connections will be single fiber full duplex connections. The older two fiber connections will be transitioned to single strand over time. 10. City and Partner connections can be lit with either 100mbps or 1000mbps (1 gig) lasers depending on the customer’s requirements. Customer Specifications 1. Every connection to the EFN will have three components: a. EFN Facilities – Which includes all fiber optic cable, aerial supports and underground conduit (not on customer property) splice cases, switching and routing equipment that is located on the public side of the Customer Premises Demarcation Point (EFN - DEMARC). Packet Page 260 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 11 of 12 b. Customer Facilities – This includes any fiber-optic or copper cable that connects a customer’s systems (Routers, Firewalls, Switches or computers) to the EFN DEMARC. c. EFN DEMARC - The DEMARC is the physical endpoint of the EFN facilities and is located inside the customer’s premises. Based on Customer requirements, the DEMARC can be Passive ( a non-powered fiber patch panel) or it can be Active (a non-powered fiber patch panel coupled to a fiber optic switch and optionally, a fiber-to-CAT 5 media converter) A small battery back-up device will be provided to ensure the Active DEMARC components remain operational during short term outages or power fluctuations. All DEMARC equipment whether passive or active is considered part of the EFN facilities from an ownership and management perspective. 2. Customers are required to provide a 15amp (min) power outlet within three feet of the EFN DEMARC location. This outlet does NOT need to be on a dedicated circuit, but should be sized to accommodate the load of the UPS during its rapid charge cycle. 3. Customers requiring non-stop EFN connectivity shall provide a circuit from the Customers continuous power source (UPS or Generator) to the UPS device powering the active DEMARC components. 4. At the time of contract signing, Customer and the City shall agree upon the location of the EFN DEMARC as well as the nature of the DEMARC components. 5. The City will provide Customer with a routable unique IP address for their connections as well as the addresses necessary to communicate with the EFN switching fabric. 6. Customer will be required to provide all interconnect cables required to connect their systems to the EFN demark. 7. Customers are not permitted to utilize the EFN UPS device for any purpose other than backing up the EFN DEMARC components. 8. Customers are encouraged to share with the EFN support team details of their Disaster Recovery / Business Continuity (DRBC) Plan so that the EFN support team is aware of the personnel who should be contacted in the case of a long or short term outage. 9. The EFN support team will provide Customer with a DRBC plan for the EFN that the Customer can incorporate into their own DRBC planning. Packet Page 261 of 415 Edmonds School District Broadband Agreement Page 12 of 12 EXHIBIT B Pricing Matrix 1. The following Pricing Matrix reflect the agreed upon pricing to be used for the term of this agreement 2. The District has chosen a minimum bandwidth commitment of 10 Mbps for the term of the agreement. This minimum commitment can be modified UPWARD given 30 days notice pursuant to the terms of Section 6.4.3.2 of this agreement. 3. Pricing Matrix: Edmonds Fiber Network - w/minimum BW Commitment Monthly Charges Minimum Committed Usage (MB) Port Charge Capital Amortization Maint Bandwidth Total Per MB 10 $50 $158 $40 $650 $898 $65 15 $50 $158 $40 $930 $1,178 $62 20 $50 $158 $40 $1,200 $1,448 $60 30 $50 $158 $40 $1,710 $1,958 $57 50 $50 $158 $40 $2,600 $2,848 $52 4. If the District’s monthly usage based on the 95th percentile calculation method is 10mb or less the monthly charge will be $898 plus any applicable taxes. 5. If the District’s monthly usage based on the 95th percentile calculation method exceeds 10mb, the monthly charge will be calculated as follows: Example: (Assuming 11.25mb usage for the period) Component Calculation Charge Port Charge Fixed Rate Component $50.00 Amortized Capital Costs Fixed Rate Component $158.00 Maintenance Charge Fixed Rate Component $40.00 Minimum Bandwidth Charge Minimum Bandwidth Charge $650.00 Bandwidth Overage (Assuming actual bandwidth at 11.25mb for the period) 11.25 – 10.00= 1.25mb x $65 = $81.25 $81.25 Total Total Monthly Charge for 11.25 Mbps $979.25 Packet Page 262 of 415 AM-1387 2.K. OpposeCommercial Air Passenger & Other Incompatible Air Service at Paine Field Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Submitted For:Michael Plunkett Time:Consent Department:Community Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title A resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, opposing commercial air passenger and other incompatible air service at Paine Field located within Snohomish County. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action The Edmonds City Council passed Resolution #810 on January 31, 1995, Resolution #1083 on February 22, 2005, and Resolution #1095 on June 5, 2005, stating and restating its opposition to commercial air passenger service at Paine Field. Narrative At the request of Edmonds City Council President Michael Plunkett, the attached resolution has been prepared to allow the City Council an opportunity to reaffirm the City’s opposition to commercial air passenger service at Paine Field. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/30/2008 04:38 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/30/2008 04:42 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/30/2008 04:43 PM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Clifton Started On: 01/30/2008 01:24 PM Final Approval Date: 01/30/2008 Packet Page 263 of 415 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 1/30/08 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, OPPOSING COMMERCIAL AIR PASSENGER AND OTHER INCOMPATIBLE AIR SERVICE AT PAINE FIELD LOCATED WITHIN SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WHEREAS, on April 11, 1978, the Snohomish County Commission expressly supported “the selection of the new redefined General Aviation role” for Paine Field, and WHEREAS, on April 11, 1978, the Snohomish County Commission expressly cited in a document titled “Role for Development of Paine Field Selected” that “The General Aviation Role will limit the expansion of aviation activities at Paine Field which are least compatible with its dominant aviation role and which would impose the most severe adverse environmental impacts on the surround communities,” and WHEREAS, on April 11, 1978, the Snohomish County Commission expressly cited in a document titled “Role for Development of Paine Field Selected” that “The General Aviation Role will provide the County with the best opportunity to successfully implement an aggressive, long term noise abatement program at Paine Field, and WHEREAS, in 1979, the Snohomish County Government adopted an agreement referred to as the Mediated Role Determination (MRD) which strongly discourages commercial air passenger service at Paine Field, and WHEREAS, since 1979, in good faith, families, business owners, and public schools have relied on the MRD, and invested billions of dollars into their homes, businesses, and schools in the vicinity of Paine Field, and {WSS685626.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - Packet Page 264 of 415 WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds agrees with the 1979 Paine Field Mediation Panel Recommendation that Paine Field remain light aircraft oriented with the role as defined “General Aviation,” and WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Regional Council’s decision to rely on Sea-Tac Airport to provide commercial airfield capacity through at least 2030 is the result of an elaborate regional decision-making process, and WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Regional Council August 2001 Regional Airport System Plan states that “The primary purpose of general aviation airports is to provide alternate landing areas and aircraft basing facilities for general aviation aircraft, so major air carrier airports, such as Sea-Tac can concentrate on passengers and air cargo,” and WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Regional Council 2001 Destination 2030 and Regional Airport System Plan update states “Sea-Tac is expected to meet the region’s commercial air passenger capacity needs until the year 2030 and perhaps beyond…,” and WHEREAS, Puget Sound Regional Council Resolution 93-03 specifically states “that there are no feasible sites for a major supplemental airport within the four-county region, and WHEREAS, Puget Sound Regional Council Resolution 93-03 addressed the use of Paine Field for commercial service and the regional decision, as reflected in the resolution, states to “eliminate small supplemental airports, including Paine Field, as a preferred alternative,” and WHEREAS, in 2003 Snohomish County Airport embarked upon a study to identify conditions necessary to bring commercial air service to Paine Field Airport, and WHEREAS, in 2004 the Snohomish County Citizens’ Cabinet on Economic Development recommended consideration of commercial air service at Paine Field as possibly providing significant benefits to attract and retain certain kinds of businesses, and {WSS685626.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 265 of 415 WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds passed Resolution #810 on January 31, 1995, Resolution #1083 on February 22, 2005, and Resolution #1095 on June 5, 2005, stating and restating its opposition to commercial and passenger air service at Paine Field, and there has been no additional information to persuade the City Council to change said resolutions, and WHEREAS, in 2006-2007, the Snohomish County Executive convened a panel to review the language of the Mediated Role Determination and the panel found that the MRD should remain a policy document that guides long-term decision making surrounding the airport, and WHEREAS, at the present time no documented demand exists to support commercial air travel into the Snohomish County Airport, and WHEREAS, the implementation of expanded commercial and passenger air service to Paine Field will have adverse impacts to the City of Edmonds, its residents and property values, and WHEREAS, the cities of Mukilteo, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace and Woodway, (representing over 77,000) have joined the City of Edmonds in expressing their opposition to commercial and incompatible air service at Paine Field, and WHEREAS, Snohomish County and the Snohomish County Airport have not provided an environmental impact statement identifying potential adverse environmental impacts associated with increased commercial and passenger air service and proposed mitigation measures to address any identified impacts, and WHEREAS, regional commercial passenger air service would jeopardize legally and financially, the County’s substantial investment in airport facilities at Paine Field and a truly poor economic decision will foster a long term major confrontation which is not in the best interests of the airport, County and surrounding communities, now, therefore, {WSS685626.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 266 of 415 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council, past Councils, families, business owners, and public schools have, since 1978, in good faith, relied on the MRD and invested billions of dollars into their homes, businesses, and schools in the vicinity of Paine Field. Section 2. The Mayor and Edmonds City Council reaffirm their earlier opposition to commercial air passenger service at Paine Field and call for the Snohomish County Executive and Council to reaffirm its commitment and support to the Mediated Role of Determination for Paine Field and to take all necessary actions to prevent commercial air passenger service at Paine Field. RESOLVED this ___ day of ________________, 2008. APPROVED: MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. {WSS685626.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - Packet Page 267 of 415 AM-1392 2.L. Countywide Transportation Benefit District Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Time:Consent Department:Community Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Countywide Transportation Benefit District. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The Mayor and City staff recommend the City Council express support for the City joining other Snohomish County Cities in a collective effort to explore and evaluate the possibility of establishing a Countywide Transportation Benefit District. Previous Council Action Narrative Snohomish County representatives are currently seeking an expression of cities’ interest in further exploration and evaluation of creating a Transportation Benefit District. Attached are documents provided to the City Council, for discussion purposes only, during the February 1 and 2, 2008 City Council Retreat. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 Link: Exhibit 2 Link: Exhibit 3 Link: Exhibit 4 Link: Exhibit 5 Link: Exhibit 6 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 04:14 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/31/2008 04:20 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 04:53 PM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Clifton Started On: 01/31/2008 04:02 PM Final Approval Date: 01/31/2008 Packet Page 268 of 415 Packet Page 269 of 415 Packet Page 270 of 415 Packet Page 271 of 415 Packet Page 272 of 415 Packet Page 273 of 415 Packet Page 274 of 415 Packet Page 275 of 415 Packet Page 276 of 415 Packet Page 277 of 415 Packet Page 278 of 415 Packet Page 279 of 415 Packet Page 280 of 415 Packet Page 281 of 415 Packet Page 282 of 415 Packet Page 283 of 415 Packet Page 284 of 415 Packet Page 285 of 415 Packet Page 286 of 415 Packet Page 287 of 415 AM-1386 3. Arts Day Proclamation Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Linda Carl Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:5 Minutes Department:Mayor's Office Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Proclamation in honor of Arts Day 2008. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative The City of Edmonds joins the Governor of the State of Washington in annually making a proclamation for Arts Day. For the past twenty-four years the Washington State Arts Alliance has coordinated Arts Day, a day when arts advocates from across the state gather in Olympia to meet with their legislators to discuss arts and culture issues. It is an opportunity for constituents to inform and educate legislators about the role of the arts in their communities and to thank them for past support. The Arts are an integral component of healthy communities and the high quality of life we value in Edmonds. The Arts bring people together, strengthen our sense of community, enhance education and contribute to a healthy economy. As we see demonstrated in Edmonds, partnership that includes the public sector, private businesses, individual citizens, artists and arts organizations is necessary to ensure such arts experiences exist and that they are accessible to all citizens. Mayor Haakenson proclaims February 19, 2008 as "Arts Day in Edmonds" and asks that you join him in recognizing the growing vitality of the arts in our community. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Proclamation Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/30/2008 12:02 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/30/2008 02:47 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/30/2008 03:33 PM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl Started On: 01/30/2008 11:02 AM Final Approval Date: 01/30/2008 Packet Page 288 of 415 Packet Page 289 of 415 Packet Page 290 of 415 AM-1376 4. City of Lynnwood Olympic View Drive Improvements Project Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Dave Gebert Time:20 Minutes Department:Engineering Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Informational presentation by City of Lynnwood staff on their Olympic View Drive improvements project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff None. For information only. Previous Council Action On October 7, 2003, Council authorized the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement with the City of Lynnwood for the Olympic View Drive water main and sewer laterals design and construction. Narrative The City of Lynnwood is planning to construct improvements to Olympic View Drive beginning in the spring of 2008. This major improvement project is planned to provide safe walking routes and repair the failing portions of the roadway. The project has been divided into two phases. Phase 1, from 178th Place SW to 168th Street SW, is scheduled to begin construction in the spring of 2008. Phase 2, from 76th Avenue West to 178th Place SW, will follow after the completion of the first phase, which is anticipated to be in 2009. Attached is a map of the project phasing and recommended detour routes for the traveling public. The construction contract will include some City of Edmonds water main replacement and sewer laterals installation in accordance with the interlocal agreement approved by Council in October 2003. In addition, the adopted Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Plan include $250,000 for a contribution by Edmonds toward sidewalk construction. City of Lynnwood Staff will provide an informational presentation on the project and Council will have an opportunity to ask questions of Lynnwood and Edmonds Staff. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Project Map Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/25/2008 08:52 AM APRV Packet Page 291 of 415 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 01/25/2008 08:52 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:00 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/28/2008 11:03 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:12 AM APRV Form Started By: Dave Gebert Started On: 01/25/2008 08:00 AM Final Approval Date: 01/28/2008 Packet Page 292 of 415 Packet Page 293 of 415 AM-1389 5. Closed Record Appeal - Hearing Examiner's Denial of Street Setback Variances Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Gina Coccia Time:45 Minutes Department:Planning Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Closed record appeal of the Hearing Examiner’s denial of two street setback variances at 24110 84 24110 84th Avenue West in the Multiple-Residential (RM-2.4) zone. Appellant and Applicant: Shaun Leiser (Files V-2007-81 & AP-2008-1). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Uphold the decision of the Hearing Examiner to deny the variance. Previous Council Action None. Narrative Shaun Leiser applied for two variances to reduce the required street setback along SR-104 (Edmonds Way) and 84th Avenue West for the construction of a new five-unit multi-family building. The required street setback along SR-104 is 15 feet and the applicant has asked for a reduction to ten feet mainly due to a large change in elevation (the site cannot be accessed from SR-104 below, however a street setback is still required by code). The required street setback along 84th Avenue West is 15 feet, and the applicant has asked for a variance of ten feet to allow parking within the street setback in order to preserve some of the existing mature evergreens (parking stalls are not permitted within the street setback in the RM zone). The applicant received approval for both variances in 2004 for this project (Files V-2004-55 and V-2004-85), but the variances have since expired. The applicant applied to reinstate the variances, and a public hearing was held on December 6, 2007. The Hearing Examiner denied the variance requests, and the Applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration. The Hearing Examiner denied the Request for Reconsideration, and the Applicant Appealed the decision (denial of the variances) to the City Council (File AP-2008-1). The exhibits attached are in chronological order. Exhibit 1 is the staff report and associated exhibits. Exhibit 2 is the verbatim transcript of the public hearing. Exhibit 3 is the Hearing Examiner’s decision. Exhibit 4 is the request for reconsideration and the Hearing Examiner’s decision. Exhibit 5 is the appeal. Fiscal Impact Packet Page 294 of 415 Attachments Link: Staff Report & Attachments Link: Verbatim Transcript Link: Hearing Examiner's Decision Link: Reconsideration Request & Decision Link: Appeal Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Planning Department Rob Chave 01/31/2008 10:06 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 10:09 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/31/2008 10:22 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/31/2008 10:24 AM APRV Form Started By: Gina Coccia Started On: 01/30/2008 05:57 PM Final Approval Date: 01/31/2008 Packet Page 295 of 415 Packet Page 296 of 415 Packet Page 297 of 415 Packet Page 298 of 415 Packet Page 299 of 415 Packet Page 300 of 415 Packet Page 301 of 415 Packet Page 302 of 415 Packet Page 303 of 415 Packet Page 304 of 415 Packet Page 305 of 415 Packet Page 306 of 415 Packet Page 307 of 415 Packet Page 308 of 415 Packet Page 309 of 415 Packet Page 310 of 415 Packet Page 311 of 415 Packet Page 312 of 415 Packet Page 313 of 415 Packet Page 314 of 415 Packet Page 315 of 415 Packet Page 316 of 415 Packet Page 317 of 415 Packet Page 318 of 415 Packet Page 319 of 415 Packet Page 320 of 415 Packet Page 321 of 415 Packet Page 322 of 415 Packet Page 323 of 415 Packet Page 324 of 415 Packet Page 325 of 415 Packet Page 326 of 415 Packet Page 327 of 415 Packet Page 328 of 415 Packet Page 329 of 415 Packet Page 330 of 415 Packet Page 331 of 415 Packet Page 332 of 415 Packet Page 333 of 415 Packet Page 334 of 415 Packet Page 335 of 415 Packet Page 336 of 415 Packet Page 337 of 415 Packet Page 338 of 415 Packet Page 339 of 415 Packet Page 340 of 415 Packet Page 341 of 415 Packet Page 342 of 415 Packet Page 343 of 415 Packet Page 344 of 415 Packet Page 345 of 415 Packet Page 346 of 415 Packet Page 347 of 415 Packet Page 348 of 415 Packet Page 349 of 415 Packet Page 350 of 415 Packet Page 351 of 415 Packet Page 352 of 415 Packet Page 353 of 415 Packet Page 354 of 415 Packet Page 355 of 415 Packet Page 356 of 415 Packet Page 357 of 415 Packet Page 358 of 415 Packet Page 359 of 415 Packet Page 360 of 415 Packet Page 361 of 415 Packet Page 362 of 415 Packet Page 363 of 415 Packet Page 364 of 415 CITY OF EDMONDS VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS OF HEARING EXAMINER HEARING File Number V-2007-81 December 6, 2007 Hearing Examiner Rice: Good afternoon. We’ll go ahead and get started. The only person here who doesn’t know me is the applicant. Hello, my name is Sharon Rice. How do you say your last name? Mr. Leiser: Uh, Leiser. Hearing Examiner Rice: Leiser. Okay. I work with the firm Toweill Rice Taylor, Mr. Leiser, and our firm has been appointed by the Edmonds City Council to provide land use hearing examiner services for the City. As the presiding official today, I do have jurisdiction to hear and decide this application. As you know, you’re application is the only item on the agenda. I’m going to go briefly through some procedural stuff so you understand your full rights and what my rights and responsibilities, well I don’t have rights, but what my responsibilities are. I’ve got no right. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, the first thing is, Gina probably told you, we’ll hear from the City first and then from you, and then we’ll take public comments. In the event that public comment raises questions or concerns that need to be addressed, we’ll allow you and the City also to respond. Any evidence that I need to know to decide the application has to be offered before we adjourn. If there’s stuff that you think I need to know that you don’t have with you today, we’ll make arrangements to receive it. But I can’t take any evidence after we adjourn and neither can any reviewing body. So you need to make sure it gets in today. I am limited in my consideration to everything that’s been offered. Have you had a chance to review the documents the City prepared? Mr. Leiser: Yes. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Can I get you to pull the microphone towards you a little bit because we are recording . . . It’s a trick microphone. We’re recording in the event of an appeal and just to allow me to re-listen to the testimony in case I need to during my deliberations. The other thing you should know is I won’t rule today on the application. I have 10 days by State law and City code, so you can expect my decision 10 business days after the close of the record. If it closes today, it will be December 20th. So I think, unless you have any questions . . . Mr. Leiser: Not at this time. Hearing Examiner Rice: You can ask them as we go along, as well. I will call to order now the application of Shaun Leiser for Variance 2007-81. This is November, no it’s not. It’s December 6, 2007, the City of Edmonds Land Use Hearing Calendar. This variance is a request to allow variances from two side street, I believe, setbacks. Before the hearing, I was given this packet of information by the City staff that includes the staff report, which is Exhibit 1, and on pages, actually Page 9 of the staff report, additional exhibits are listed in detail. Mr. Leiser, you had an opportunity to review the documents. Did you have any objections to anything that was offered? Mr. Leiser: No. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, then they will be admitted. And any additional documents will be numbered sequentially. Before we take testimony, land use testimony has testimony given under oath to enhance the credibility of the record. So at this time, I would like to ask everyone who plans to testify, please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you give will be true? If so, say I do. Okay, thank you. The record will reflect that all who testified are under oath, and we’ll start with the City’s presentation. Packet Page 365 of 415 Ms. Coccia: Good afternoon. My name is Gina Coccia. I’m a planner in the Development Services Department. This proposal is for a new five-unit multi-family development in four buildings at 24110 – 84th Avenue West in a multiple residential RM-2.4 zone. Three of these buildings will be single-family detached units, and one of the buildings will contain two dwelling units, a duplex. There’s a turnaround space towards the center of the space, and the drive isle that accesses the site is from 84th Avenue West. Each building has garage parking, and there are two surface parking stalls proposed. This project has some history in that the applicant has already gone through and obtained approval for the design by the ADB, File ADB-2004-54, and for the setback variances requested today files V-2004-55 and V-2004-85. These approvals have since expired and he’s going through the approval process again. Ms. Coccia: The applicant has stated that nothing has changed since the original permits were approved. The details of the approval and expiration dates are found in the staff report, Exhibit 1. The applicant should be aware that the building permits he has applied for are due to expire one year from the date of submittal, which is February 6, 2008. If the building permits expire, the applicant would have to go through the ADB process again. Just to note. Ms. Coccia: So for this project, the notice of application and hearing was published in THE HERALD newspaper, posted on the subject site, as well as the public safety complex, community development department and the library on October 3, 2007. Also, notices were mailed to everyone within 300 feet of the site. So the City has complied with the noticing provisions in the code. Ms. Coccia: The applicant had originally submitted an environmental checklist review because the proposed buildings required SEPA review in that there were five dwelling units proposed, along with approximately 15 cubic yards of grading. So the original SEPA determination was adopted. The only mitigating measure was a traffic impact fee, which we now have under our code, so we no longer use SEPA to require traffic impact fees. This project was reviewed by many City departments, including the Engineering Division and the Engineering Program Manager has submitted a memo regarding this project, Exhibit 7. So they require a stated condition that states, “All utility easements shall be maintained and no structures shall be located within the easement area. Ms. Coccia: This site is located in a neighborhood that is a mix of multi-family and single-family, and then down the street there’s some commercial development that’s kind of near Safeway and an auto repair shop and a chiropractic office. To date, no public comments have been received, although I see someone from the audience here that might like to provide testimony, and that is welcome. So I think I’ll keep this brief and I’ll go over the criteria for a variance. The applicant has requested two street setback variances because the project fronts on two streets. One of the streets is Edmonds Way, and the site does not have any access from Edmonds Way due to the topography of the site; it’s way up the hill from it. That is one. The other item is something that came up with the Architectural Design Board review the first time around, and it’s that the RM zone does not permit parking in the setback areas. So he is requesting a variance to allow two surface parking stalls in the street setback area in order to preserve some trees on site. Ms. Coccia: There are six criteria that the applicant must meet for a variance approval. One is special circumstances. Staff believes that special circumstances exist on the property, including the shape of the property. The existing, large, mature vegetation and the fact that the street, Edmonds Way, is separated by the site, the height of the slope, plus this road does not have access to the site, nor would it ever. Ms. Coccia: Two is special privilege. The applicant has received variance approval for the same project in the past, where he was required to prove that all six variance criteria were met. This is an example of how granting a variance would not be a grant of special privilege. Ms. Coccia: Three, Comprehensive Plan. So Section 9 of Exhibit 1 discusses consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Mainly, I’d like to show that the proposal would encourage the preservation of trees and that the design proposal was approved by the ADB. In doing so, they found it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Coccia: Zoning ordinance. Section 11 of Exhibit 1 discusses the consistency with the criteria given in the zoning ordinance of the City of Edmonds. If the proposed variance is approved, the use will be consistent with the zoning ordinance. Ms. Coccia: Not detrimental. Staff feels that this proposal does not appear to be detrimental. In fact, it provides for an overall better design of the site. There are no known local views, so that didn’t seem to be an issue. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 2 Packet Page 366 of 415 Ms. Coccia: Minimum variance. Staff feels that the street setback variances are the minimum necessary to both preserve the existing trees and to comply with other codes. Therefore, based on the analysis and attachments in the staff report, staff recommends approval of both the setback variances, with conditions. Would you like me to go through the conditions? Hearing Examiner Rice: No, I do have a question on one condition, but I have some other questions first. Ms. Coccia: Sure, I’d be happy to answer any questions at this time. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, great. I don’t really belief SEPA applies to variance applications, per say, so. And I appreciate the SEPA analysis doesn’t speak to the criteria for variance approval. I’m curious, though; your staff report seems to imply that the applicant would pay traffic impact mitigation fees subject to the ordinance that was approved after his other application was decided. Ms. Coccia: So, that’s up to the Engineering Division to figure out the vesting on that, but I know that in the past, we’ve used SEPA to require the applicant to pay these fees, and now it’s just in our code. That’s something the Engineering Division sorts out. The applicant might be able to speak to that. Hearing Examiner Rice: Leaving that, the Engineering Department asked that the utility easements be honored. Do we have any idea where on the site plan such utility easements might be located? Ms. Coccia: I think that was a standard default kind of statement. I didn’t notice anything; I didn’t see anything in the site plan . . . Let me take a look here at Exhibit 9, the site plan. I don’t see any easements shown at all, actually. So, I would ask the applicant if he knows of any easements on the property. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Mr. Leiser: Do you want me to answer that now? Hearing Examiner Rice: Let me ask some more questions of staff, and then we’ll come back to that question. I also note that in your staff report you said there are no critical areas adjacent to the property, but the slope adjacent to the property is 50%. Isn’t that a critical area? Ms. Coccia: So when this application came in for a critical areas review, that was under our old code prior to the spring of 2005 where it was determined that no critical areas are on or adjacent to the property, so it was issued a waiver. However, when I was looking at that, I though, wow, that’s a pretty steep slope, and I pulled it up on our Lydar Map and scaled it off. It appeared to be approximately 50%. That said, I’m not the planner that’s assigned to the building permit, so I’m not exactly sure where we are on that. I don’t believe that the planner that was working on the building permit changed the original critical areas determination based on our new code or if she just adopted the one under our old code. But if she changed it, a geotechnical report would be required if the buildings were within 65 feet of the top of the slope. Hearing Examiner Rice: And that’s my question because if we’re talking about reducing a setback basically from the top of the slope to 10 feet is my understanding, would that be permitted. Because the variance applications that are before us now have to be decided under current code, regardless of how the previous variance applications were decided. Ms. Coccia: Right. Hearing Examiner Rice: I guess we need some information about what the required setback is and whether development on this property would be required to comply with the setback. Ms. Coccia: So I would suggest that if we were to approve this variance from Edmonds Way, actually both of them, I guess, that it should be looked at under our current code. In that case, a geotechnical report would be required in order to reduce the setback from the top of the slope from 50 feet plus a 15-foot buffer to whatever the geotechnical engineer felt was appropriate. So I feel like if the applicant and geotechnical engineer could prove that a 10-foot setback is appropriate based on the soils or what not, that staff would be okay with that. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 367 of 415 Hearing Examiner Rice: Clearly that would make since, but in order to approve the variance for the street setbacks, don’t I have to review whether or not adequate evidence is provided to show that it’s going to comply with the critical areas ordinance? Ms. Coccia: Yes. Hearing Examiner Rice: So I don’t know. . . From our discussion now, I’m still not clear. If it’s a critical area and if there’s a greater than 10-foot setback required from the top of this 50% slope, do I need review geotech before I can issue the variance, itself? Ms. Coccia: Okay, not knowing that this project needed a variance at the time of the submittal when a planner would just say, oh well, you need a geotechnical engineer to write a report saying that you can build close to the slope. So I guess I could ask the applicant if he’s already working with a geotechnical engineer. If that’s already been done, I’m not exactly sure, because I’m not the planner working on the building permit. But under the old code, yes, it was a waiver. Under the new code I would say it was a steep slope. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. And then let me ask you this. Do we happen to know if the planner working on the building permit would be available to testify today. Ms. Coccia: She has gone home for the day. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, so the answer is no. Ms. Coccia: No. Hearing Examiner Rice: I think we’re going to come back to the question of the steep slope. Regardless the slope and the size and shape of the property are accepted by the City as satisfying the special circumstances inherent on the property, Criteria 1 for variance approval? Ms. Coccia: Correct. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. On the question of parking. On Page 5 of the staff report you have off-street parking regulations analysis, and you’re citing the code. It shows that three or more bedroom units require two parking spaces each. Therefore, this five-unit development with three bedrooms each does require 10, and the applicant has proposed 10. Ms. Coccia: Right. Hearing Examiner Rice: Do we happen to know, is there any nearby safe on-street parking in case of guests or in case any one unit has more than two cars? Ms. Coccia: When I drove by the site, I noticed it’s on a cul-de-sac. It’s not a busy, developed cul-de-sac. If I was a neighbor visiting the site or a friend or a family member, I would probably just park on the. . . You know there’s not striped parking spaces that I actually saw, but I probably would just park on the street. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, and there are no no-parking signs in that cul-de-sac? Ms. Coccia: Not that I saw. I didn’t see any. Hearing Examiner Rice: So in your analysis, that nearby cul-de-sac, and the site access from that cul-de-sac, correct? Ms. Coccia: Correct. Hearing Examiner Rice: That’s the dead end of 84th? Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 4 Packet Page 368 of 415 Ms. Coccia: Yes. Hearing Examiner Rice: In your analysis, there’s adequate or there is safe on-street parking there? Ms. Coccia: I didn’t any on-street striped parking, but I would park my car there. Hearing Examiner Rice: Is there a rule in Edmonds you can only park where it’s striped? I bet I’m in trouble if that’s the case. Ms. Coccia: I don’t know. I should. Maybe the applicant knows more about the street. Hearing Examiner Rice: I’ll ask him also. Now I had some questions about your analysis. On Page 7 under Item D, I’m not sure I understand what’s being said there. You’ve there’s a wide expanse between the edge of the developed portion of Edmonds way right-of-way and the property line, which the 2004 staff report argued seems to reduce the need for a 15-foot street setback. Ms. Coccia: Okay, so Meg was the original planner that worked on this project. In her staff report, she argued that Edmonds Way, the actual paved portion of Edmonds Way, was actually further away from the property line than it looked in that there’s a discrepancy between where the actual Edmonds Way was paved in relation to the edge of the right-of-way. It actually feels like Edmonds Way is a lot further away than it would show on this map. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Ms. Coccia: If you don’t go out to the site, you won’t really understand the feeling of how far Edmonds Way really is from this property. Hearing Examiner Rice: No, I have driven by the site. What I don’t know is, is the City in a position to develop that extra width of its right-of-way and are there any plans to do so on the horizon? Ms. Coccia: I don’t know of any plans, and it wasn’t brought to my attention through the review of the Engineering and Public Works Departments. Hearing Examiner Rice: Now, my main concern on the variance criteria for approval is the final criteria, minimum variance. I might have just generated this idea myself in my head, or I might have read it someplace in the file, but if the applicant had fewer bedrooms, fewer parking spaces would be needed. So I’ve heard other variance applications in the City of Edmonds before in which a theory was inserted such that the applicant could redo their proposal in order to not require the variance, and therefore, this is not the minimum variance required. Could you address that? Ms. Coccia: I think this proposal before you is just one option. I think the applicant could have designed the proposal to have fewer bedrooms, possibly. But I’m curious what that would do the rest of the site. I’m sure the applicant, in doing the feasibility, probably came up with several ideas, and maybe the applicant can speak to why this one was chosen above all others. The minimum necessary, one of the reasons I felt this project met the minimum necessary criteria is that this property has, one, two, three, four, five sides, and we would treat this as a corner lot in that there are one, two, three property lines that we would require a 15-foot street setback from. This proposal shows a 10-foot side setback essentially from all property lines. I just didn’t feel like that was asking too much, I guess. Hearing Examiner Rice: You also on Page 8 of the staff report, you cite to it’s being the minimum necessary to preserve trees. Could you speak to that? Ms. Coccia: Right. Let me get a good exhibit here that shows it. I mean, I know there’s some trees shown on the site plan that the applicant is trying to preserve. Let me go through here and find a good exhibit. Do we have a landscape plan in here? Hearing Examiner Rice: The very last. Exhibit 16 at the back is a conceptual landscape plan. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 5 Packet Page 369 of 415 Ms. Coccia: Let’s look at that. Exhibit 16. Now I pulled this from the old 2004 file. Hearing Examiner Rice: The variance is for these two parking spaces closest to the corner, right? Ms. Coccia: Right. So let’s ask the applicant. This might be an older site plan, but the original variance was approved because he was trying to preserve trees, and I’m now sure that I have the correct exhibit here for the conceptual landscape plan because I think the intent was to preserve trees, and this doesn’t really show those trees. Hearing Examiner Rice: Sure. Well then, let’s go ahead and let Mr. Leiser speak to that. You can start with the tree issue or you can start anywhere. Mr. Leiser: I’ll start there because I’m going to have a hard time trying to touch every point, I guess. The best exhibit to look at is going to the site plan on Exhibit 9. Hearing Examiner Rice: Which is Exhibit 9. Mr. Leiser: So if you look where the two parking stalls are, it shows a dashed line with a 15-foot front setback. Hearing Examiner Rice: Sure. Mr. Leiser: So to fit my parking within that 15 feet, I would have to shift the stalls to the northwest and by doing so, we would be removing mature trees that we’re trying to maintain. Hearing Examiner Rice: Would that be all four of those trees shown there? Mr. Leiser: More than likely because it’s really, you know, we’re going to have to create a surface that’s going to be able to hold up to the weight, and we don’t want the roots to deteriorate the parking surface and so forth. So we want to try and stay as far away from the trees but still maintain them. Hearing Examiner Rice: So that’s a 15-foot setback from 84th. And aren’t we also trying to reduce a setback from Edmonds Way at the same, at the other end of the parking stalls? So it would be the same, wouldn’t it? Mr. Leiser: Yes. Hearing Examiner Rice: Because we don’t have that 15-foot setback with a dotted line, do we? Am I missing that? Mr. Leiser: If you look at where it says 15-foot front setback where it angles there, it dashes across. Hearing Examiner Rice: I see. There it is. Okay. Okay, so it’s those four trees in particular? Mr. Leiser: That we would like to maintain, and that’s the reasoning for the variance on that setback. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Mr. Leiser, have you spoken with a geotechnical engineer? Mr. Leiser: I do have a geotechnical engineer that I use consistently. I don’t believe that I had any . . Oh no, I believe I did submit a geotechnical report to the City for building because I do remember now digging test holes on the property. I dug them myself, so I know that there is some data that has been recorded and/or submitted to the City. Not knowing specifically if it is touching on the points of the steep slopes, but the slope is a graded slope that grades down to Edmonds Way, which I guess in my, I don’t know if you want to say educated or uneducated opinion, it’s not really, I guess in my mind, a slope of concern. I guess that could be argued either way, but it’s really based on a geotech. It’s a slope that’s been a stable slope. There’s no deterioration of it. It’s been there for days and days. You’d think if it had an issue, you would have seen an issue just a couple days back when we had five inches of rain. Hearing Examiner Rice: Certainly. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 6 Packet Page 370 of 415 Mr. Leiser: And I guess, you know, once again, the variance was approved once before. The reason why I’m here today is because I missed the expiration. So once again, I’m asking for what once before was approved. Hearing Examiner Rice: Sure, and I understand that and appreciate the difficulty that puts you in. However, your applications that are now before us have to be decided under the codes that were in effect at the time. As Ms. Coccia said, the critical areas ordinance did change in 2005. Mr. Leiser: Understood. Hearing Examiner Rice: So there are new criteria that may have to be satisfied. What I’m think we’re going to have to do is we’re, going to have to hold the record open for planning staff to address the issues. Is it a critical area? If not, end of report. If it doesn’t satisfy the requirements for steep slope as a critical area. . . No, if it doesn’t we’re done. If it does, then what setback is required and/or what information does the applicant have to provide. I feel like we’re going to have to need some more information. In understand we’re in a hurry and we’d all like to get this wrapped up, so we’ll make that as fast as possible, but I think I need more information from the City on that issue, and then the applicant would have to have an opportunity to respond. Mr. Leiser: Would the variance be something that could be approved subject to the City’s interpretation of a geotechnical report. Because basically the City’s going to interpret whether the geotech satisfies information necessary to build in the area, so subject to the approval of the City’s report or inspection or review, you’re approval was approved. Hearing Examiner Rice: I could fashion a condition like that, and we probably would. But before we even get there, I’d have to have analysis about whether or not the critical areas ordinance even applies. Ms. Coccia: Okay, so two things I was wrestling with. One, this application for a variance was submitted under the current code, and under the current code, yes, I would change it in the system, yes it is a critical area because it’s on or adjacent to a slope. Hearing Examiner Rice: What’s the cut off? Isn’t the cut off like 30% or 40%? Ms. Coccia: Actually 15%, so yes, this would be a critical area under our current code. When he submitted his building permit application in February, even though the system says waiver for critical areas from 2004, the planner probably looked at it and said, oh waiver, great, next. Under my review, I would say, definitely, this is a critical area. In doing so, that would require the applicant, with his building permit, to submit a geotechnical report that addresses the critical areas requirements. Basically, the geotechnical engineer would have to write a memo and review the soil and the structural and say that he went out to the site and is familiar with the project and that it’s not going to impact any critical areas off site. He would speak to the foundation and how those are going to be designed. It’s my understanding that the building department would require a geotechnical report anyway, so that’s probably what he was remembering. Planning does have different criteria, so it’s just an addendum to his existing geotechnical report that would talk about the buffer and the slope, if any. Hearing Examiner Rice: So are you asserting. . . Are you arguing maybe I don’t need to review this information, it will all be handled during building permit review? Ms. Coccia: It is handled during building permit review. However, it can only go as far as the setback would allow. So during building permit review, right now, his variances are expired. The street setback is 15 feet. If the geotechnical engineer found that it was okay, we could reduce the steep slope setback to be flush with 15 feet. He’s asking for 10-feet, so he’d need a variance. Hearing Examiner Rice: He would need a variance from the critical areas as well? Because right now, we’re just talking about street setbacks. Ms. Coccia: Right. Hearing Examiner Rice: And that would be a separate variance from a critical area buffer setback. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 7 Packet Page 371 of 415 Ms. Coccia: Let me look at the code real quick and see exactly what the language says. One second. Hearing Examiner Rice: We might be able to whittle this out today instead of holding the record open. I’m just curious, Mr. Leiser, what’s your target market for these? Are these rentals or are they for sale? Mr. Leiser: They’re rental units. I think one of your questions that I made note on was about reducing bedrooms or so forth. I have multiple rental units, and a three-bedroom unit is by far the best rental unit. Even if I was to sell, I have both build to sell and build as rental properties, but even based on sales too, obviously the more bedrooms you have, the better off it is and the higher value the property and the higher tax base it is for the City and so forth for taxes and everything else. I guess that touches on that note. Mr. Leiser: Another note I took was as far as your question with the parking in the cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac has probably got to be the most dead cul-de-sac there is. I mean, it’s like the cul-de-sac is there virtually almost to access my property. Originally, there was a road that went down to SR-104 prior to them doing the widening of SR-104. When they did the widening of SR-104, that’s probably when the steep slope was created to create a cut back in the degrees of the bank to have a safe buffer or slope to SR-104. So I’m sure that engineering was looked at at that time, also, as to what would be a safe slope for the type of soils that are there in the area so they wouldn’t have a wash out onto SR-104 or . . . Hearing Examiner Rice: Yeah, obviously, the City is not interested in that. Mr. Leiser: Exactly. But it did have a road down to SR-104, which was then blocked off at the time of the widening, which then created the cul-de-sac. Hearing Examiner Rice: Right. I’m just going to assert, without any special knowledge, that the cul-de-sac isn’t actually there to provide access to any particular property. It’s there to provide emergency vehicle turnaround access. And that is required by fire code, most likely. Mr. Leiser: Correct. Hearing Examiner Rice: And therefore, whether cars may or may not park there speaks to the fire code. But we don’t have any information on that, either. Mr. Leiser: Well the widths of the road, I mean I don’t know if it’s state or city or whichever land, but the cul-de-sac is also fenced. So the paved area, and then there’s a large buffer between the paved area and the fencing, which is more than enough area to be able to provide off-street parking or what have you. Mr. Leiser: The last note I have. This would be the minimum necessary to maintain the mature trees that we’re trying to keep on site. It also, the engineering standards kind of drive a lot of building, I don’t want to say issues, but parameters, I guess, for creating a workable site. I’m still going to have to have my turn around, which I have in there, which is the 30-foot diameter turn around. By doing so, you know, one meeting the engineering standards, and then two meeting setbacks, I’m really kind of limited to the amount of space that I have to create a nice project. Hearing Examiner Rice: How big is this parcel? Mr. Leiser: I believe it’s 13,200 square feet, 13,201. Hearing Examiner Rice: So, it’s just over an acre? Mr. Leiser: No an acre is 44,000 square feet. Hearing Examiner Rice: I’m sorry. It’s just over a quarter of an acre. Mr. Leiser: Yeah. And being that the property is an irregular shape with there being five sides. A standard corner lot, I would have two setbacks, which on this one, I have three. So it’s creating an impact to me to where I have to keep shoving my buildings farther and farther back. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 8 Packet Page 372 of 415 Hearing Examiner Rice: Yeah. I don’t have questions on any of the criteria except for the minimum necessary criteria, and I’m still struggling with that one. Did you find some critical areas language for us? Ms. Coccia: Right, so the minimum buffer. . . So structures can be located near a critical area, but it says that the minimum buffer shall be equal to the height of the slope existing within the project area or 50-feet, whichever is greater. So I would say 50 feet in this case. And then is says, buffer reduction. The buffer may be reduced to a minimum of 10 feet when a qualified professional demonstrates to the satisfaction of the director that the reduction will adequately protect the proposed development, adjacent developments and uses in the subject critical area. Hearing Examiner Rice: Can I get the citation you’re reading from? Ms. Coccia: Edmonds Community Development Code, Chapter 23.80.070.A.1.a. And then under 23.80.070.A.2, alterations. This applicable to this project. Alterations. Alterations of an erosion or a landslide hazard area and/or buffer may only occur for activities for which a hazardous analysis is submitted that certifies that a) the development will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions. b) the development will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties, and c) such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas. So when applicants come in with their building permit and they’re meeting setbacks but they’re not meeting the critical area buffer, they supply us with a geotechnical report that shows that whatever they’re proposing to do can be done safely and the geotechnical engineer typically writes a geotechnical report for our building department. As part of that, they will address the sections I just quoted and how it can be built safely and not affect the critical area or adjacent properties. The code allows the applicant to get up to the property line even. However, we always have setbacks so they can never do that unless there are no setbacks for the zone. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, and it sounded like under A.1, the determination would be made by the director. Ms. Coccia: Right. Hearing Examiner Rice: And under A.2, was there any language about whose doing the review there? Is that engineering? Ms. Coccia: Actually, this whole critical areas chapter is subject to review by the director and planning staff does the review. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. So then the critical areas issue, how would you recommend that I handle the critical areas issue? Ms. Coccia: Staff would recommend that we add a condition of approval that says that the applicant will need to provide the Planning Division with a geotechnical report that addresses all these criteria in ECDC 23.80.070.A.2, alterations to critical areas. Hearing Examiner Rice: And also A.1, correct, because he’s requesting to reduce the buffer, as well? Ms. Coccia: Yes. Well, yes, we feel that 2 also. . . 1 is done by 2, but yes, 1 and 2. Because in this other section, in 23.40, it says that there’s a 15-foot setback from the edge of any critical area buffer so it would ultimately be 65 feet. He’d have to stay at least 65 feet back from the top of the slope if he didn’t want to submit a geotechnical report. Hearing Examiner Rice: And I’m looking now, Mr. Leiser, at Exhibit 9, the contour lines. Where is the top of the slope in relationship to the property boundary? Mr. Leiser: I believe the top of the slope would be right on the angled property line down to SR-104. Basically where the dot is next to F26, which is by the fir trees, the mature trees we’re trying to maintain. Hearing Examiner Rice: Yeah, okay. Mr. Leiser: So all those dashed lines, I believe, are two-foot intervals, I believe. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 9 Packet Page 373 of 415 Hearing Examiner Rice: The line that has circles on it is the property boundary? No the solid line is the property boundary, right? Mr. Leiser: Correct. Hearing Examiner Rice: And then, what is the line with the circles? Mr. Leiser: The line with the circles is the state fence that I was talking about before. The state basically put in a metal cyclone fence which basically goes around that property and encapsulates the highway, the state route, and then goes up and actually encapsulates the whole cul-de-sac all the way up to Highway 99 to where the Gregerson’s homes are. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, so you’re guessing the top of the slope is the dotted line that crosses the fence? Mr. Leiser: The top would basically be where the S is, where it says 60.0241. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, so yeah, that dotted line, if you follow it, it crosses the fence, and in fact it goes into your garage, or into your structure. Is that right? Mr. Leiser: I wouldn’t say that’s necessarily the top of the slope. I guess that’s just more of a contour line. Hearing Examiner Rice: It’s just a contour line, right? And that’s very widely set, so that’s obviously not sloped there. It’s a 2-foot elevation difference. So then, I don’t know, I’m not a geotechnical engineer. I don’t know where the actually the top of the slope would be demarcated, but chances are good it’s not that line because that’s too wide. Mr. Leiser: Correct. A better depiction would be the next line down, which carries along parallel with the property line. Ms. Coccia: Staff would agree with that. That’s the one we would look at when we review a building permit. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. So can staff submit that recommended condition of approval in writing and give the applicant a chance to review that? I don’t know if you want to do that by email or whatever and just fax it to me, that would be fine. Ms. Coccia: Sure. Hearing Examiner Rice: Mr. Leiser, did you have other information you wanted to offer? Mr. Leiser: No, I think I’ve stated most everything I need to. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, before we turn it over to public testimony, I’m still stuck on the minimum variance issue. Ms. Coccia: I think the applicant brought up a good point. There’s a huge fence that encloses most of the property, and treating the west property line as a street setback doesn’t feel appropriate. But having it be 10 feet, which corresponds with a side setback feels much more appropriate. I guess I could add that. Hearing Examiner Rice: And that speaks to the fact that it’s not adjacent to an actual street? I’m not sure what you’re saying. Ms. Coccia: I guest to Number 10 because it corresponds to a side setback and because when you are going our there it feels like a side setback. If you’re up near the fence, you don’t really see the street. Hearing Examiner Rice: It actually functions as a side setback, in other words? Ms. Coccia: Right. Thank you. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 10 Packet Page 374 of 415 Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, well that’s helpful. Mr. Leiser: And generally a corner lot, your property line is within, I guess it varies, but maybe within 5 or 10 feet of the road or so forth. But the road is probably, as a guestimate, like 30 feet or more away. So there’s actually already a large setback. So as you say, I mean it pretty much already acts as if it is. Hearing Examiner Rice: I understand, but I have to apply the code to your property line and not to the right-of-way outside of your property line, which the City could or could not choose to use or the state could or could not choose to use for whatever purpose at some other time. Although the right-of-way adjacent to 104 seems much less likely to ever be utilized for any purpose. It’s a steep slope, so what are they going to put on it? All right, let’s open it up for public comment. Please. Mr. Rutledge: Al Rutledge, 7101 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds. There’s two or three items. The first one is, you have an easement, the City of Edmonds and the property owner, if they make a change, that easement can go out eventually, so that easement should be worded differently. It should be worded as an easement change. Hearing Examiner Rice: Do you mean the condition about the easement? Mr. Rutledge: Well, I’ve been involved with property two or three years ago, and I have property on an easement. Easements today, they tell you not to buy property years ago. Today it can be changed to easements so the person that owns an easement can fight in the court. It all depends on how that is filed in the court. The language, that you can always change that back. Sometimes, years ago, when you bought a piece of property, you might have a road go down with four homes off there, but it says that the owner back in 48, what was it 48, that decided he had a lot there on the corner, but the easement, he sold all the lots, but if they finally ever decide to sell that, they can take the easement back off. So I don’t know what the . . . the easement would be the only thing is it should be changed where, unless easement change, if somebody makes an easement change, a person can do, you know, what he wants with it. Mr. Rutledge: The other thing is on the building application process, this one came back in 2004. There’s been changes in the City. If you allow anything from 2004 up to date, think this whole process should be the same way. If you run against a thing here that they have changed, and you’re going with the applicant on that, that should be for the whole complete process. Otherwise, he should file all over again and put everything in at one time. So I know what it says here, you’re continuing his date until February, but I do think that has to be looked like. Mr. Rutledge: The other concern I have with the building heights. I went through here. He has three floors. I did find the second floor, that’s on A.3 and A.5, and it’s A.4 in the packet, but I did find it in the page here. It is in here. Then this roof, he’s got 4 to 8 feet. He doesn’t clearly say how high his roof’s going to be. You can go 25 feet. There’s places in the City here that have 30 feet. I mean they go they put their roof on the corner like he’s trying to do, but he doesn’t want to get into the spot where he’s at 32 or 34 feet here. But it doesn’t say. . . He says here four to eight feet here on the roof, and that’s on Page A.6. Mr. Rutledge: The last issue I have is since this is a rental unit, they should be reporting to crime watch in that area to make sure that when people rent their facilities, they know what the report is on the crime watch. They’re all different. That just protects the renter for renting the unit, also, at the same time. Hearing Examiner Rice: Thank you. Mr. Rutledge: That’s about Edmonds Way is 104, it’s a busy street, too. Hearing Examiner Rice: Thank you. Mr. Leiser, where is the duplex on your site plan? Mr. Leiser: It is 24118 A and B. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Now, I understand this application is in a strange posture because it was previously approved. But again, because the variances that were previously approved have expired, they have to be reapproved under the current regime, which has changed no only in the code, but in the Hearing Examiner. So things have changed, and I Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 11 Packet Page 375 of 415 remain concerned about the minimum necessary criteria, which is the last one. So again, I’ve decided other variances in the City of Edmonds where people were required to change their site plan, or that’s not true, people were not require to. But the variance was denied because it was possible to remove the need for a variance by changing the site plan. In this case, there’s clearly a hardship, I mean there’s clearly a special circumstance, all the other criteria are clearly satisfied from what I’ve read in my opinion. But I don’t feel that the minimum necessary criteria has been demonstrated to be satisfied. So I just want to ask on the record again, if you guys want to try again. Ms. Coccia: So maybe the applicant can talk about the length and the width of the duplex building. Also the property at 24112 and maybe the market and how . . . (The tape changed at this point.) Because if the variance isn’t granted, then bulk of the buildings will need to be reduced by about at least five feet, I think. Hearing Examiner Rice: I understand that, and I appreciate that a great amount of thought has gone into this. Unfortunately, I don’t have “no harm no foul” authority. I only have “it has to satisfy the code” authority, and that’s why I’m kind of going over and over this point because I have to apply the rules as they’re written. And the rules say it has to be the minimum necessary variance from the code to allow basically reasonable use. The code doesn’t require and applicant to be afforded the most profitable use of his property. It requires him to be provided the reasonable use of his property. That’s the problem. Mr. Leiser: I think a lot of it has to do with creating workable, drivable access. To be able . . . We actually looked at different designs. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Mr. Leiser: But this was by far the most appropriate way to locate the houses in a manner that could still meet the parking diameter minimum with the location of the houses. Ms. Coccia: See it looks like on Exhibit. . . I’m just looking at the floor plans here for those two buildings to get an idea of how wide they are. It looks like, if you look at the floor plans for 24118 A and B and 24112. . . Hearing Examiner Rice: Can you tell me what sheet that is? Ms. Coccia: Sorry, I kind of taped over it. It looks like A.4 possibly. Hearing Examiner Rice: Second floor plan to 118, 112 and 116? Ms. Coccia: Yes. It looks like they’re only 20 feet wide in most spots. Hearing Examiner Rice: And what’s only 20 feet wide? Ms. Coccia: The second floor plan for 24112 and 24116 and 24118. Maybe the applicant can remind us how many square feet these units are. Mr. Leiser: The units’ square footage sizes are based on the site plan. The square footages are within a norm, if not below, square footage size for a three-bedroom unit. I guess I’d also note, we oriented the houses in such a way to maintain as many as the on-site mature trees. If they oriented them in other ways, we’d also be losing more trees, which I think is a large consideration to consider being as many projects wipe out as many trees as possible. In this way, we tried to maintain as many on-site mature trees as we could with the orientation of the buildings. Hearing Examiner Rice: So what are the square footages? Ms. Coccia: So in Exhibit 9, there’s a chart right above the title “Site Plan,” and it says building area and square feet. And you have the building areas for each of the four buildings. It looks like Building 1 is the largest. That must be the duplex at 2,944 square feet. That’s right, so Building 1A is 1,472 square feet. Building 1B, the other part of the duplex, is 1,472 square feet. Building 2 is 1,472 square feet. Buildings 3 and 4 are 1,472 square feet. So each dwelling unit is less than 1,500 Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 12 Packet Page 376 of 415 square feet in area, so the applicant has a better idea of if that’s a standard housing size, if that’s smaller than normal, if it’s way bigger than normal. I’m not really sure, but the applicant . . . Mr. Leiser: Like I said, I have other rental units. Most of my three-bedroom units are 1,600 square foot plus. Basically, we used the same design for each building. With regards to the duplex, we didn’t have. . . If we were to maintain the two-car garages on there, it would have expanded them beyond our property lines. And then, also, it would have created another issue with parking turn around. Ms. Coccia: So I guess staff feels that a 1,472 square foot dwelling unit is not an enormous size for one dwelling unit and is pretty minimal. I would say that. Mr. Leiser: And also let’s look at other designs that we designed. We weren’t needing the amount of units that we could build for the lot size, square footage, which wouldn’t be in the best interest of meeting the land use and so forth to make the most amount of use out of the size land that you have available to decrease sprawl and so forth. Hearing Examiner Rice: What is the minimum density. Ms. Coccia: Sure. So this project is in the RM-2.4 zone, so that means the minimum lot area per dwelling unit is 2,400 square feet. Hearing Examiner Rice: And is there a maximum for that area per unit? Ms. Coccia: No. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Okay, anything further. Ms. Coccia: I don’t have anything further. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, anything from the applicant? Mr. Leiser: I guess to add, once again, that we’re trying to maintain the mature trees on site and meet the allowable and appropriate number of units for the land. Hearing Examiner Rice: Actually, that’s the question I was asking for. 2,400 square feet doesn’t answer my questions. Is there a range of units that’s allowed in this zone? Ms. Coccia: Well, I just took the number 13,201 square feet divided by 2,400 square feet per dwelling unit, and I came up with 5.5 as the maximum number of dwelling units. Hearing Examiner Rice: Got it. The zoning code or the Comprehensive Plan designation, do they have a range of limits of unit numbers? Ms. Coccia: No. Well, the Comprehensive Plan has a land use table that shows the comparable land use designations, the zoning with the comp plan designations. This is consistent with the comp plan designation. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, but neither plan calls for a maximum or minimum number of units for the zone? Ms. Coccia: No. Hearing Examiner Rice: And I assume neither plan addresses square footage per unit. Ms. Coccia: Right. Well, the zoning ordinance. . . Hearing Examiner Rice: I don’t mean lot square footage, I mean residential unit square footage. Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 13 Packet Page 377 of 415 Ms. Coccia: That is correct. Yes, you’re right. Mr. Leiser: I guess the only other thing to add would just be based on the ADB review. They had many positive comments about the design and orientation and usage of land and so forth that were all positive comments. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, I’ll be sure and look at that ADB report very closely. Ms. Coccia: I have one last question. So staff is going to draft up a condition related to the geotechnical report that is going to be requested. I noticed that your geotechnical engineer on Exhibit 9 is Liu and Associates, and we’re very familiar with their work, so I’ll be drafting up the condition, and I can just email that to you, Shaun? Mr. Leiser: Yes, that’s fine. Ms. Coccia: And then I’ll email it to you, too. Hearing Examiner Rice: After you two come to an agreement on that. Did you have any questions or concerns about the other conditions of approval that are recommended? Mr. Leiser: No. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay. Then, I’m not actually going to hold the record open for that. I’m just going to allow you to submit that after. . . I mean, it’s entered. We’re entering that as an additional recommended condition of approval, it’s not an exhibit. So you can just submit that to me as soon as possible. Ms. Coccia: Okay, I will do that. Hearing Examiner Rice: Okay, then we’ll close. We’re adjourned. Thanks everybody. Ms. Coccia: Thank you. Mr. Leiser: Thank you. I TESTIFY THAT THESE VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY TO TRANSCRIBE THE PROCEEDINGS. __________________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Karin Noyes, Transcriber Date Verbatim Planning Board Transcripts File Number R-05-97 February 14, 2007 Page 14 Packet Page 378 of 415 Packet Page 379 of 415 Packet Page 380 of 415 Packet Page 381 of 415 Packet Page 382 of 415 Packet Page 383 of 415 Packet Page 384 of 415 Packet Page 385 of 415 Packet Page 386 of 415 Packet Page 387 of 415 Packet Page 388 of 415 Packet Page 389 of 415 Packet Page 390 of 415 Packet Page 391 of 415 Packet Page 392 of 415 Packet Page 393 of 415 Packet Page 394 of 415 Packet Page 395 of 415 Packet Page 396 of 415 Packet Page 397 of 415 Packet Page 398 of 415 Packet Page 399 of 415 Packet Page 400 of 415 Packet Page 401 of 415 Packet Page 402 of 415 Packet Page 403 of 415 Packet Page 404 of 415 Packet Page 405 of 415 Packet Page 406 of 415 Packet Page 407 of 415 AM-1377 7. Interim zoning ordinance amending definition of Local Public Facility Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:02/05/2008 Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:15 Minutes Department:Development Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Adoption of Interim Zoning Ordinance amending the definition of Local Public Facility. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Adopt the proposed ordinance and set March 4, 2008 as the date for a public hearing on the interim ordinance. Previous Council Action In 2001, the City adopted Ordinance 3353 which established community facility zoning regulations, including a definition of local public facilities. Narrative Recently, the City issued a staff interpretation (Exhibit 2) of the zoning code definition of local public facilities which would allow private or for profit community facilities as a conditional use in single family residential zones. Staff does not believe that this was the intent of the City Council and believes that an interim zoning ordinance (Exhibit 1) should be passed to close this loophole in the code until the matter can be clearly reviewed. By law a public hearing on the interim zoning ordinance must be held within 60 days of the adoption of the ordinance. Staff recommends that a public hearing be held on March 4, 2008. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Draft Interim Zoning Ordinance Link: Exhibit 2 - Staff Interpretation Local Public Facilities Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:00 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 01/28/2008 11:03 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 01/28/2008 11:12 AM APRV Form Started By: Duane Started On: 01/25/2008 09:38 Packet Page 408 of 415 Form Started By: Duane Bowman Started On: 01/25/2008 09:38 AM Final Approval Date: 01/28/2008 Packet Page 409 of 415 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF LOCAL PUBLIC FACILITIES IN ECDC 21.55.007, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING, AND PROVIDING FOR AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the current definition of local public facilities in ECDC 21.55.007 may include private community facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the public interest to adopt an interim ordinance more clearly defining what constitutes local public facilities for purposes of the Edmonds Community Development Code pending a public hearing in order to preserve the character of residential neighborhoods while final definition of the term is determined; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings in support of this interim Ordinance: a) The current definition of local public facilities in ECDC 21.55.007 does not preclude private and or for profit community facilities from being considered local public facilities. b) Under the current code, local public facilities are a permitted conditional use in Single-Family Residential (RS) zones. c) Development of private and or for profit community facilities in RS zones is inconsistent with the intended character of the City’s RS zones. d) The City is authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 to adopt interim zoning control for the purpose of preserving the status quo while new development standards are considered, prepared and enacted. {BFP684144.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - 1 - Packet Page 410 of 415 e) It is necessary to adopt this ordinance as an immediately-effective interim zoning control in order to prevent development rights from vesting to the City’s current regulations. f) The interim amendment set forth herein will serve and is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Section 2. Amended. ECDC 21.55.007, Local public facilities. is hereby amended to read as follows: Local public facilities mean any community facilities operated by a unit of local, state or federal government (or by a third party on behalf of a unit of local, state or federal government), primarily sited, designed, constructed, and operated for the purpose of providing public health, safety and welfare services to the immediate area or neighborhood in which they are sited. Local public facilities include, but are not limited to: police stations, fire stations, branch libraries, bus stop shelters, electrical substations, water pump stations, community club houses, parks and recreation special use areas, branch governmental and administrative offices, service clubs, storage and associated maintenance buildings and yards. Section 3. Public Hearing. As required by RCW 35A.63.220, this interim Ordinance shall expire six months from the date of adoption, unless sooner repealed or subsequently extended by act of the City Council. In the meantime, as further required by RCW 35A.63.220, the City Clerk is directed to schedule a public hearing on this ordinance within sixty (60) days of its adoption. The City Council may in its discretion adopt additional findings in support of this interim Ordinance at the conclusion of the public hearing. The Planning Board is required to make a recommendation on the final version of this ordinance to be adopted by the City Council prior to its expiration. Section 4. Declaration of Emergency. The basis for the City Council’s determination that the enactment of this interim Ordinance is and should be an emergency measure is the preservation of the character of residential neighborhoods in the City of Edmonds {BFP684144.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - 2 - Packet Page 411 of 415 pending the final definition and determination of what constitutes local public facilities. Upon the vote of a majority plus one of the City Council, this ordinance shall be effective as provided in Section 7 below. Section 5. Ordinance to be Transmitted to Department. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, this interim Ordinance shall be transmitted to the Washington Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development as required by law. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this interim Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This interim Ordinance has been adopted as an emergency measure on the affirmative vote of a majority plus one of the City Council and shall be effective immediately upon and after its passage. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {BFP684144.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - 3 - Packet Page 412 of 415 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF LOCAL PUBLIC FACILITIES IN ECDC 21.55.007, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING, AND PROVIDING FOR AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2008. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP684144.DOC;1/00006.900150/} - 4 - Packet Page 413 of 415 MEMORANDUM Date: January 15, 2008 To: Interpretations File No. 2008-1 From: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Subject: INTERPRETATION REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ARE A LOCAL PUBLIC FACILITIY. Date Issued/Posted: JANUARY 15, 2008 Effective Date: JANUARY 30, 2008 (unless appealed in a timely manner) Issue Outline: A question has been raised whether or not a private recreational facility fits the definition of a local public facility under the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Relevant Code Sections: 21.15.071 Community facilities. A. Community facilities mean any use, structure, building, or development that: 1. Is primarily used or dedicated for use by members of the general public for educational, religious, informational, recreational, artistic, or social purposes; or 2. Serves members of the general public by providing for utility, transportation, police, fire, and parking services; or 3. Is primarily used or dedicated for use by local, state, regional, or federal governments for the purpose of providing governmental services. B. Community facilities consist of churches, local public facilities, parks, and regional public facilities. C. Community facilities do not include animal hospitals, boarding houses, congregate care facilities, day care facilities, fraternities, foster homes, halfway houses, home occupations, hospitals, rooming houses, retirement homes, sororities, or similar medical, hospice, or care uses. [Ord. 3353 § 14, 2001]. 21.55.007 Local public facilities. Local public facilities mean any community facilities primarily sited, designed, constructed, and operated for the purpose of providing public health, safety and welfare services to the immediate area or neighborhood in which they are sited. Local public facilities include, but are not limited to: police stations, fire stations, branch libraries, bus stop shelters, electrical substations, water pump stations, community club houses, parks and recreation special use areas, branch governmental and administrative offices, service clubs, storage and associated maintenance buildings and yards. [Ord. 3353 § 16, 2001]. Packet Page 414 of 415 Analysis: The term “community facilities”, as defined in ECDC 21.15.071, establishes three criteria which identifies whether or not any use, structure, building, or development can be considered a “community facility”. Of the three tests, test number reads as follows, “1. Is primarily used or dedicated for use by members of the general public for educational, religious, informational, recreational, artistic, or social purposes;”. A private recreational facility which has membership open to the public fits this test as a use that is “recreational” and “social” in purpose. Next the term “local public facility”, as defined in ECDC 21.55.007, includes examples of “local public facilities” such as “police stations, fire stations, branch libraries, bus stop shelters, electrical substations, water pump stations, community club houses, parks and recreation special use areas, (emphasis added)branch governmental and administrative offices, service clubs, storage and associated maintenance buildings and yards”. A private recreational facility which has membership open to the public fits this definition. It is a club that serves as a recreational facility. THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING INTERPRETATION IS HEREBY ISSUED: THE TERM “LOCAL PUBLIC FACILITY” INCLUDES PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES THAT ARE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR MEMBERSHIP, SUBJECT TO THE GRANT OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Appeal Procedures: Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Sections 20.105.010 and 20.105.020, staff interpretations of the text of the ECDC are appealable decisions. Should anyone wish to appeal this interpretation, a written appeal, accompanied by the required appeal fee (see Planning Division fee handout) must be submitted within 14 calendar days of the date of issuance/posting of this interpretation. The deadline for filing an appeal of this interpretation is: JANUARY 30, 2008 . A written appeal must contain the following: 1) A reference to the decision being appealed. 2) The name and address of the person appealing, and his or her interest in the matter. 3) The reasons why the person appealing believes the interpretation to be inappropriate. Posted: 1) Edmonds City Hall, 2nd Floor – Development Services Department 2) Edmonds Library 3) Edmonds Post Office 0046_1377_2008-1_private recreational facilities.doc Page 2 Packet Page 415 of 415