2008.07.29 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
July 29, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-1690 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 22, 2008.
C. AM-1692 Approval of claim checks #105682 through #105842 for July 24, 2008 in the amount of
$1,031,103.25.
D. AM-1686 Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from William David Barnum & Cheryl Barnum
(amount undetermined).
E. AM-1689 Approval of 2008 Taxicab Operator's License for Yellow Cab of Washington.
F. AM-1688 Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 4 with CH2M Hill for Olympic
View Drive Water Main and Sewer Laterals project.
G. AM-1693 Ordinance amending the provisions of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 3691 in order to insert a
hearing date.
3. (10 Minutes)Swearing-in Ceremony for Corporal Damian Smith.
4. AM-1687
(10 Minutes)
Second Reading: An ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington granting a
nonexclusive franchise to Verizon Northwest, Inc. to construct, maintain, operate and
repair a cable system to provide cable services in, across, over, along, under, upon,
through and below the public rights-of-way of the City of Edmonds; providing for
severability and establishing an effective date.
5. AM-1677
(60 Minutes)
Closed Record Review: Appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision to deny the request by
Steve Smith Development LLC, represented by Jean Morgan of Morgan Design Group,
to subdivide Arbor Court, a 1.27 acre parcel developed with 35 townhomes, into 35
fee-simple townhouse parcels. The site is zoned Multiple Family Residential (RM-1.5)
and is located at 23800 – 23824 Edmonds Way. (File Nos. P-08-16 and APL-08-4)
6. AM-1691 Public Hearing on the recommendation by the Planning Board to deny a proposal to
Packet Page 1 of 426
6. AM-1691
(30 Minutes)
Public Hearing on the recommendation by the Planning Board to deny a proposal to
amend the Comprehensive Plan from “Downtown Mixed Commercial” to either (1)
“Downtown Residential Office” or (2) “Multi Family – High Density” at 110 Sunset Ave.
N. (File No. AMD-07-16)
7.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings.
8. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
9. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 426
AM-1690 2.B.
Approval of 07-22-08 City Council Meeting Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 22, 2008.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 07-22-08 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 10:10 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 11:16 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 01:30 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 07/24/2008 10:06
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 3 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
July 22, 2008
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Michael Plunkett, Council President
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Gina Coccia, Planner
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Haakenson relayed Council’s request to add “Reconsideration of the Public Hearing on the Liquor
Control Board License application for Province, Inc., DBA Five Spice Bistro” to the agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 15, 2008.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #105599 THROUGH #105681 FOR JULY 17, 2008 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $155,046.93. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS
#46835 THROUGH #46955 FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2008 THROUGH JULY 15, 2008 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $858,652.39.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM HAINES POINT
HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND WILLIAM STANTON
($1,776.36).
E. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF EDMONDS MASONIC
LODGE NO. 165.
F. REPORT ON BIDS OPENED JULY 8, 2008 FOR THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL PARK AND REGIONAL INFILTRATION SYSTEM AND AWARD OF CONTRACT
TO PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.
Packet Page 4 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 2
G. ORDINANCE NO. 3690 – AMENDING THE OFFICIAL STREET MAP AUTHORIZING THE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR TO MAKE CHANGES (REDUCE CERTAIN
PLANNED LINE RIGHT OF WAY ON 203RD STREET SW FROM THIRTY TO FIFTEEN
FEET IN WIDTH.
3. PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS
Bob Rinehart, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Board Member, provided the Council an update
on the Chamber’s web-based “Everything Edmonds” campaign that encourages Edmonds residents to patronize
businesses in Edmonds. Their objective was to promote local businesses, boost sales tax revenues, provide a
hedge against declining sources of revenue and reduce the need to increase taxes. Their premise regarding the
value of patronizing local business was reinforced by a reputable study that illustrated for every $100 an
individual spent at a local business, $68 was recycled within the community, compared to $43 for big box
businesses. Further, local business owners are active in the community as evidenced by local businesses’
involvement in Halloween and sponsoring the 4th of July and other events. He advised the
EverythingEdmonds.com website was fully sponsored and maintained by the Chamber and included information
regarding every licensed business located in Edmonds.
Jan Vance, Executive Director, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, displayed the
EverythingEdmonds.com website, that contains Find a Business, Calendar/Events, Edmonds Links and Featured
Businesses. She displayed several photographs contained on the website and sayings that encouraged residents
to shop locally.
Fred Bell, South Snohomish County Historical Society, read a letter in response to the questions Council
President Plunkett presented via email to the Historical Society: 1) Would the Historical Society be willing to
put their proposal in writing? Yes, however, it would have saved time if they had known of this requirement two
months ago. 2) Will the Historical Society pay for a temporary move? No, the Society will not invest in a
temporary project. 3) Will the Society pay for a permanent move? Yes. Would the Historical Society pay for
the maintenance? Yes. Will the Historical Society bond for maintenance? Had the Historical Society known of
this requirement two months ago, they would have researched the request and obtain the bond if deemed
necessary.
The owners of the Bettinger/Kretzler house have offered the historic residence to the City, the Historical Society
or a private party as a goodwill gesture to the community. The City turned down the offer due to the cost of
moving and maintaining the house; however, the Historical Society recognized the historical significance and,
believing it was in the best interest of the community to save it, accepted the challenge to find a new location
within the bowl. The initial deadline of July 1, 2008 for the Historical Society to provide the property owners a
solution was extended to August 1, 2008; however, having explored all options and after lengthy discussion, the
Historical Society has reluctantly decided they cannot accept the responsibility of relocating the house within
the prescribed time limit and relinquishes its interest in the house back to the owners.
4. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON GRANTING A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC. TO
CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE AND REPAIR A CABLE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE CABLE
SERVICES IN, ACROSS, OVER, ALONG, UNDER, UPON, THROUGH AND BELOW THE PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton advised the Council was provided with
copies of minor amendments to the agreement that was contained in the packet. He explained Verizon was
currently in the process of upgrading its existing Telecommunications Facilities in the City by installing a state-
of-the-art Fiber to the Premise Telecommunications Network (FTTP). In addition to providing residents with
Packet Page 5 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 3
voice and high-speed data services, Verizon Northwest Inc. seeks to provide cable television service, utilizing
the FTTP Network, to City residents, businesses and institutions in competition with the existing cable
television operator serving the City. In order to do so, Verizon and the City must first execute a cable franchise
agreement. As such, Verizon has requested a franchise from the City to operate and provide cable television
service within the City’s incorporated areas. Included in the Council packet is a staff report, ordinance granting
a nonexclusive Franchise to Verizon and a Cable Franchise Agreement between the City and Verizon Northwest
Inc. The staff report contains a summary describing why Verizon needs a franchise agreement to operate a
cable television system within the city, requirements for granting franchise agreements under United States
Code Title 47 and other applicable provisions of the law including Edmonds City Code 4.68. The report also
highlights significant terms of the franchise agreement.
With regard to the negotiation process, Mr. Clifton explained because Verizon planned to provide cable
television service throughout southwest Snohomish County, earlier this year City Attorney Scott Snyder and he
recommended the City work with other jurisdictions and collectively negotiate a franchise agreement with
Verizon to ensure the public receives maximum rights and benefits from their respective franchise agreements.
As authorized by the City Council in February 2008, Mr. Snyder and Elana Zana, Ogden Murphy Wallace and
he negotiated an Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish County and nine other cities (North Puget Sound
Consortium). On March 25, 2008 the City Council authorized Mayor Haakenson to sign an Interlocal
Agreement with the consortium members. The City Council also authorized executing a consultant agreement
with River Oaks Communication Corporation to help the consortium and the City negotiate a franchise
agreement. The consortium and River Oaks have since negotiated on behalf of all consortium members in an
effort to create a template that could be used by each as a base document subject to refinement and further
negotiation between Verizon and each entity. He noted consulting on cable telecommunication matters was a
core function of River Oaks and they had provided consulting services on cable television and other
telecommunication matters in 25 states in addition to providing consulting services that involve a variety of
cable television, Wi-Fi and other telecommunication projects. They have also worked successfully with over 30
communities in the Seattle-Tacoma area and worked on franchise agreements with Everett, Kirkland,
Marysville, Mukilteo and Snohomish with Comcast and its predecessor.
Bob Duchen, Vice-President, River Oaks, explained they were part of the negotiating team to develop a
franchise template to serve as a model for the nine cities and Snohomish County. The goal was to develop a
franchise that was competitively neutral, mindful of the current Comcast agreement and ensure there was
competitive neutrality between the documents. The Verizon agreement differed from the Comcast agreement
because Verizon was a common carrier with a telecommunications network that wants to be in the cable
business; Comcast is a cable company that is now in the telephone business. He pointed out similarities
between the Verizon and Comcast agreements, both are 15 year franchises, and both contain customer service
standards and insurance provisions. He summarized the franchise agreement with Verizon achieved competitive
neutrality between the companies and the agreement had been intensely negotiated with Verizon and represented
an agreement in the best interest of the residents of Edmonds. He noted they worked closely with Ogden
Murphy Wallace in crafting the agreement and expressed his appreciation for their assistance.
Councilmember Orvis asked if the two networks would carry similar channels and would both broadcast
Council meetings. Denise Reddy, Franchise Manager, Verizon, advised they had committed in their
agreement to provide both the current government access channel, the Edmonds Community College channel
and in addition reserved two channels for future educational/government purposes.
Councilmember Wilson commented in Pierce County the communities worked together to form a multi-
jurisdictional cable clearing house for production and in the past other cable franchise agreements in Snohomish
County have included some level of financing to the community college for educational programs. He asked if
a specific amount toward educational purposes or formation of a multi-jurisdictional production facility was
considered in this agreement. Mr. Duchen answered the document contains a provision that allows the City to
Packet Page 6 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 4
collect $0.35 per subscriber per month for educational and governmental (EG) purposes which can be increased
to $1.00 per month. There is also a provision in the document for a $10,000 EG grant.
Mr. Snyder explained in addition to the consortium, Elana Zana and he had been negotiating on behalf of
Edmonds, Woodway, Woodinville and Mukilteo and as part of that negotiation had “set the table” for facilities
at Edmonds Community College. He noted the previous term PEG (Public Education and Governmental) was
shortened to Educational and Government programming with the belief that there are many avenues for
individuals to get their message out via the Internet without raising first amendment and cost issues. Mr. Clifton
advised Edmonds Community College was working with southwest Snohomish County cities to structure the
type of entity in Pierce County whereby a facility, possibly located at Edmonds Community College, could
produce programming for cities. The cities have been meeting with Edmonds Community College on a
potential structure and equipment. He noted if a facility were co-developed at Edmonds Community College,
students would have the ability as part of a communications program to hone their skills while producing
programming.
Councilmember Wilson asked if the $10,000 EG grant was one-time funding. Mr. Clifton advised it was.
Councilmember Wilson noted the $0.35-$1.00 per month was through the 15 year term of the agreement. Mr.
Snyder explained FCC regulation provides that a franchisee who makes a grant was entitled to pass that cost on
to the consumer. In effect, the $0.35-$1.00 per subscriber fee was a “backdoor tax.” The Comcast agreement
provided for upfront grants but no monthly charge. Negotiations with Comcast would begin this year and it was
anticipated an agreement would be in place within three years when the Comcast agreement expires. At that
time the focus would shift from upfront grants to continuing funding mechanisms. The franchise agreement
between the City and Verizon authorizes fees of up to $1.00 with an initial level of $0.35. The Council has the
ability to raise the fee over the course of the agreement as deemed appropriate as long as it was applied
uniformly to both franchisees.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the list of major provisions in the staff report, specifically that Verizon
must offer cable television service to a significant number of subscribers within 12 months of the service date
and asked how a significant number was defined. Mr. Clifton relayed according to Verizon significant was
described as just over 50% of residents.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the provision that Verizon would pay the City a franchise fee in the
amount of 5% of its annual gross revenues derived from operation of the cable system and asked how much this
would be. Mr. Duchen advised it would depend on the number of subscribers; Verizon was typically successful
in obtaining approximately 20%. Mr. Snyder noted 5% was the maximum permitted by law. He noted because
a Verizon customer would be a former Comcast customer, it was not anticipated there would be any impact on
City revenues. Councilmember Wambolt asked whether Verizon expected new customers. Mr. Clifton clarified
there was not expected to be a net impact to the City budget because it was unlikely a customer would subscribe
to both Comcast and Verizon; the current 5% franchise fee collected from Comcast would be offset by the
franchise fee collected by Verizon. Ms. Reddy noted there may be some opportunity to acquire additional
customers who currently subscribe to satellite service; satellite customers do not pay a franchise fee to the City.
There was also an opportunity to generate franchise fees as consumers decide to enhance their service offerings.
Mr. Snyder recognized another valuable member of the negotiation team, Peter Camp, Snohomish County
Executive’s office, whose time and energy resulted in a much better deal for all participants than could have
been realized on their own. He pointed out the security and liquidated damage provisions in the Verizon
franchise agreement, noting the Comcast agreement was taken over from Chambers Cable. When Chambers
came into the community, they were a first time cable network that did not have the track record of Verizon or
Comcast. Therefore many of the franchise agreements for start-up cable companies have very extensive security
provisions. Verizon, as a Title 2 telephone provider, has their plant and fiber optics already in the City’s right-
of-way. The City has the ability under its police power to impose separate security requirements. Unlike
overhead cable, if for some reason Verizon failed, the City would like to have the fiber optic cable. He
Packet Page 7 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 5
concluded although the security and liquidated damage provisions were less than in the Comcast agreement,
they were appropriate in light of the economics and the financial stability of Verizon.
Mr. Clifton expressed his thanks to Elana Zana, Ogden Murphy Wallace, for her assistance with negotiating the
franchise agreement. He noted not only did she provide an overall structure to the negotiating team, she
excelled in keeping key members focused and also maintained consistent follow-through, ensuring all
consortium members were kept informed in a timely manner. He also recognized Denise Reddy, Verizon, and
Emma Zavala-Suarez, Stoel Rives, who assisted Verizon with negotiations.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, welcomed competition between Verizon and Comcast. He expressed concern with
the potential danger to public safety due to the amount of equipment mounted on poles throughout the City and
asked who was responsible for the condition and replacement of the poles. He suggested requiring an inventory
of the poles’ condition and certification that they could accept the additional load.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether the agreement governed or established standards for stringing wires.
Mr. Snyder answered that was closely regulated by the State Electric code and State statute as well as the
Snohomish County PUD who owned the poles. He noted in reviewing the Snohomish County PUD’s pole
attachment agreement for Edmonds’ own fiber, there were strict standards regarding separation, weight, height,
etc. He was satisfied that issue was adequately addressed.
Councilmember Bernheim commented he had noticed many unattractive wires on poles, often with 50-100 extra
feet of wire. Mr. Duchen answered this agreement did not regulate that; because Verizon’s network was a FTTP
network, they could not use the cable franchise agreement as a means of regulating what was done in the right-
of-way including equipment on poles. Mr. Snyder advised the agreement preserved the City’s police power and
to the extent the City had the ability to regulate that issue, it could. He advised in neighborhoods where utilities
were underground, Verizon’s facilities would be underground; in neighborhoods where it was on poles, the
equipment would remain on poles.
Councilmember Bernheim asked if there was any regulation of “careless looking wiring.” Mayor Haakenson
advised the loops that have been brought to his attention were extra wires that Verizon had not yet strung. Mr.
Snyder noted if there were concerns about a specific location that information could be passed on to the State
Electrical Inspector. Mayor Haakenson noted early on Verizon was linking wires with large junction boxes
between poles that were very unsightly and blocked views. After contacting the local representative, Verizon
was more careful about where they located the junction boxes. He concluded Verizon had been very responsive.
Mayor Haakenson advised as the ordinance adopting the franchise agreement required a first and second
reading, it would be returned to the Council next week for final authorization.
5. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE REQUEST
BY JAMES UNDERHILL TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION FOR
PROPERTIES ALONG A PORTION OF 215TH STREET SW AND EAST OF 76TH AVENUE WEST
FROM “MIXED USE COMMERCIAL” TO “SINGLE FAMILY URBAN 1” (FILE AMD-2007-14).
Planner Gina Coccia reviewed the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, explaining James Underhill filed an
application to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for properties along 215th Street SW near Stevens
Hospital. The Planning Board held a public hearing on June 11th and considered the staff report, public
testimony and testimony from the applicant. Based on their findings, the Planning Board made a
recommendation to the City Council to deny the proposed plan amendment. She displayed the existing
Packet Page 8 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 6
Comprehensive Plan map, identifying the subject properties, designated Mixed Use Commercial and located
within the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center. She identified the existing zoning as Multiple Residential
(RM-2.4). She also identified two other areas of Single Family Urban 1 designation in the surrounding area.
Ms. Coccia provided a brief history, explaining there were 19 parcels in the applicant’s proposal; 2 parcels along
76th Avenue West have requested to be removed from the applicant’s proposal. The area was developed with
houses in the late 1950s and early 1960s and annexed into Edmonds in 1959. The area has been zoned and
designated for multiple residential use since at least 1963. Single family homes are a permitted primary use in
the existing RM-2.4 zone.
Ms. Coccia reviewed the Planning Board’s findings:
1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the public interest?
- The proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and inconsistent with the goals and objectives
of the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center.
- The application would not be in the best interest of the public.
- The current Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning have been in place since the early 1960s.
- The single-family residential nature of the neighborhood along 215th Street SW has remained intact and
has not changed for a long time.
2. Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the city?
- The proposed amendment is counter to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and not in the best interest
of the public.
- Staff feels that the proposal does not appear to have a logical boundary.
3. Does the proposed amendment maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the city?
- The balance of land uses would likely not be impacted either way.
- The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is clear that the area should be mixed use.
- The proposed amendment, if approved, would change the land use designation that has been in place
since at least 1963, which calls for more intense development.
- The applicant’s argument that the neighborhood is close to shopping, medical, educational opportunities
and public transit is good, but these amenities really support a more intense use of the properties.
4. Is the subject parcel physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use
development, including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land
uses and absence of physical constraints?
- The applicant did not make an adequate case that the subject parcel would be physically suitable for the
requested land use designation.
- The site is relatively flat and does not appear to be physically impacted by critical areas. However,
there is a fundamental difference between this single-family residential area that is completely
surrounded by more intense uses than the other single-family residential areas that are located around
the periphery of the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center. These other neighborhoods extend out from
the activity center and into surrounding residential zones.
Ms. Coccia explained the existing residential homes may remain, but changing the Comprehensive Plan and
later the zoning to limit future uses to single-family residential would not be appropriate. It would result in an
island surrounded by other more intensive uses. The activity center is an economic driver for future
development, which means more intensive uses would occur in the area in the long term. The fact that the two
western-most properties have asked to be removed from the applicant’s proposal suggests a problem – it could
be expected to result in a loss of future economic value and tax revenue because the future of the neighborhood
would no longer have the potential for a variety of more intense uses. If the two western properties were
removed from the proposal, it would also further exacerbate the island effect that approval of the proposed
amendment would have on the vicinity.
Packet Page 9 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 7
Applicant
Jim Underhill, Edmonds, explained their neighborhood consisted of 19 houses, 50 residents, and 18 of the 19
houses are owner-occupied. It is a place that has experienced the benefit of private funds to upgrade homes,
provides affordable housing to the City and is a place that has matured and diversified. The neighborhood is
also an historic community. In order to protect the neighborhood, 17 of the 19 homeowners agreed to apply, 10
paid an equal share of the $2600 fee. He acknowledged the request had not been without opposition or debate.
Mr. Underhill questioned which vision for their neighborhood would be adopted - the City’s vision which would
eliminate residential houses and opening properties to offices, apartments and other commercial uses or the
vision of the present owners who desire to retain the character and use of the neighborhood and realize the
protection of the Single Family Urban 1 designation and thus continue to provide the City with quality
affordable housing and the many benefits that offers. The City’s intension for the neighborhood was made clear
in discussions by the Hwy. 99 Task Force, their neighborhood had no future as a residential area. He reported
on his contact with the Edmonds School District and Stevens Hospital as their neighborhood was included as a
residential street in their master plans; both indicated they would not object to the proposed amendment. The
City’s Technical Committee also did not object to the amendment as they provided no comment. He noted
several Planning Board Members favored their request as did many of the people in attendance at the meeting.
The Comprehensive Plan also supports their request in nine specific places and he was incredulous that the
City’s Planning Division felt it necessary to undo an established neighborhood that contained quality and
affordable houses to develop a new neighborhood that included affordable, quality housing. He noted the City
could not afford to build affordable homes such as existed in this neighborhood.
Mr. Underhill referred to the Planning Board minutes, specifically the comments by Board Member Jim Young
regarding the need to protect this type of neighborhood. He noted the faults in the City’s analysis were not
challenged by the Planning Board and recalled several members of the Planning Board who spoke against the
amendment asked whether bulldozers were in front of their houses, commenting unless bulldozers were ready to
tear down the houses, there was no issue.
He referred to the City’s plans for intense development in their neighborhood, and plans for BR/BR2 (Business
Residential) that was intended for communities surrounding 76th and 212th that would allow three stories of
mixed use to more intensely develop the immediate neighborhood, a zone the Planning Board denied in the past.
Their neighborhood had never been an impediment to the economic development of Hwy. 99, and staff provided
no statistics or analysis to support that claim.
With regard to the parties who asked to be removed from the request, the owner on the south side was an
absentee landlord and did not share the neighborhood’s vision. The Martinez assert that harm would occur if the
amendment were allowed to move forward, but provided no description regarding the degree or type of harm
that would occur. With regard to staff’s comment that this neighborhood is different, he agreed they were
different and took pride in that. They are a vibrant, thriving neighborhood. With regard to the City’s finding
that their request failed all four criteria; in the neighborhood’s view, they passed all four. There are nine
sections in the Comprehensive Plan that support single family residential homes. The residents of this
neighborhood are committed local consumers and are what is needed in the community, part of the blend from
apartments to condominiums to single family residence, not an isolated group but part of the whole. He
requested the Council approve the Comprehensive Plan map amendment to Single Family Urban 1.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. He advised the Council
received two emails and a letter, from Susana Martinez who requested denial of the request and from Doug and
Cathy Stewart who asked that the request be upheld.
Packet Page 10 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 8
Norman Knaack, Edmonds, a 30-year resident of 215th Street concurred with Mr. Underhill’s statement. He
noted it had always been a single family neighborhood and requested the Council’s assistance in keeping it a
single family neighborhood.
Mark Schrock, Edmonds, a 14 year resident of 215th Street, advised on October 10, 2008, the neighborhood
would celebrate the 50th anniversary of Joseph and Lola Luschen’s dream for a tract free from the threat of
moving or being crowded out. He recommended the covenants they filed with Snohomish County and by which
the neighborhood has abided by for 50 years not be tossed aside. He concurred with Mr. Underhill’s comments.
Vicki Thompson, Edmonds, a 31-year resident of 215th Street, commented there used to be more air and less
noise. As development has occurred around them including apartments, condominiums, a larger hospital, their
single family neighborhood was what was left of mixed use. She asked the Council to help them retain what
was left of their neighborhood.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, expressed his support for Mr. Underhill’s comments, recalling Mr. Underhill had
spoken out a number of times over the years regarding protection of his neighborhood. Mr. Hertrich suggested
the Planning Board identify this as a special district due to its historic value. He urged the Council to see the
neighborhood’s point of view and the importance of retaining a sense of history throughout the City. He agreed
this was a fragile area, surrounded by increasing commercial development and high density residential.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing. He advised the Council also
received emails/letters from Barry Stewart, Linda Van Nest, and Helen Maeda in favor of Mr. Underhill’s
proposal and a letter from Alden & Joanna Peppel who were opposed.
Councilmember Orvis inquired about the covenants referred to by Mr. Schrock. Ms. Coccia advised the
covenants were contained in the packet on page 81 and the City Attorney’s response regarding the covenants
was contained in his memorandum (Exhibit 4).
Councilmember Wilson commented it was his understanding that the covenants did not affect the City’s ability
to zone the property but the covenants would require the neighborhood remain single family in perpetuity or
until the covenants were removed. City Attorney Scott Snyder responded covenants were for individuals to
support via courts; the City did not recognize covenants and they had no legal bearing on the Council’s decision.
Councilmember Wilson concluded from Mr. Snyder’s comments that covenants were only as good as an owner
was willing to enforce them. Mr. Snyder agreed, noting that was a completely separate process.
Councilmember Wilson asked if anyone could enforce a covenant. Mr. Snyder answered only another property
owner within the subdivision. Councilmember Wilson assumed all the homeowners in this subdivision had the
right to enforce the covenants upon other property owners. Mr. Snyder agreed. Ms. Coccia referred to Item 16
on page 83 of the packet, which states the covenants would expire in 1983 unless readopted and there was no
evidence that they had been readopted. Councilmember Wilson commented the covenant issue was moot
because they had expired. Mr. Snyder reiterated the covenants were irrelevant to the Council’s decision.
Councilmember Orvis commented the City was under no obligation to enforce covenants. Mr. Snyder agreed.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether this was a down zone. Development Services Director Duane
Bowman explained this was a Comprehensive Plan amendment that would change the land use designation to
Single Family Urban 1 which would potentially lead to a rezone/down zone of the property to single family
from multi family. He noted the Comprehensive Plan must match the zoning; this was the first step whereby the
property could ultimately be rezoned to single family.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether there had ever been a similar request made or granted in the past 20
years. Mr. Bowman could not recall such a request but would need to research the records.
Packet Page 11 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 9
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out nothing would happen in this neighborhood under the current zoning to
make it multi family unless the current owners sold or redeveloped their property. Mr. Bowman agreed, noting
single family use was allowed in the multi family zone.
Councilmember Wambolt commented he had never seen a municipality enforce any covenants; that was the
responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Mr. Bowman agreed it was the responsibility of the
Homeowners Association or other party to the covenants.
Councilmember Wilson referred to the finding that there was not a logical boundary for the area. Ms. Coccia
relayed staff’s finding that there was not an appropriate or logical boundary because it was not near any other
Single Family Urban 1 property. Councilmember Wilson noted the criteria stated it would not be detrimental to
the public interest, health, safety or welfare of the City and asked how the proposed boundary would be
detrimental. Mr. Bowman referred to the existing Comprehensive Plan map, pointing out the single family area
on the periphery, noting this area was not on the periphery and would create an island of single family in the
center of the Hwy. 99/Medical area. Because multi family development, Edmonds-Woodway High School and
Stevens Medical Center surround the neighborhood, the proposed amendment did not support the land use plan
of mixed use high density for the area and the current designation was consistent with the plan for the area. Ms.
Coccia referred to pages 43 of the packet, a map from 1963 where the City acknowledged there were single
family dwelling units on that street and the land use plan at that time designated and zoned the area multi family.
Councilmember Wilson reiterated the current zoning allowed single family use. He referred to the first criteria,
the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Mr. Underhill’s reference to statements
in the Comprehensive Plan that single family was a goal/priority in the City. He asked what criteria the Council
should use to judge whether an amendment was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Bowman
answered the Comprehensive Plan must be considered as a whole. The agenda memo listed the criteria the
Council must use in evaluating a Comprehensive Plan amendment. He quoted from Planning Board Member
Reid’s summation on page 11 of the packet, “Upon reviewing the Comprehensive Plan, he said he doesn’t see
any other single-family residential neighborhoods located in the center of the activity center. The proposed
change would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would not be in the public interest. The
proposal would also be inconsistent with adjoining properties.” Mr. Bowman did not deny the neighborhood
was unique, however, under the current land use designation and zoning, the property owners retain their ability
to remain single family as long as they choose. However, from a planning perspective, it was appropriate to
retain the historic designation.
Councilmember Wilson asked if there were any other examples in the Comprehensive Plan where the
designation of six houses on one side of the street and ten on the other side was changed. Mr. Bowman
explained the question before the Council was whether the area identified for a change in the designation was
consistent with the vision for that area. If the Council believed it was not, the Council could concur with Mr.
Underhill’s request. The Planning Board and staff has identified reasons they did not find it consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether the homeowners had any vested rights in the current zoning, an
expectation of the zoning when they purchased their property. Mr. Snyder commented that was a legislative
matter for the Council to consider. Mr. Bowman advised there was no vested right in the current zoning.
Councilmember Bernheim summarized the Council was legally authorized to change the zoning as long as it
was done via due process. Mr. Snyder and Mr. Bowman agreed.
Councilmember Wilson asked if the Council was compelled to accept the application if it determined the four
criteria had been met. Mr. Snyder advised the criteria had to be met for the Council to consider the application;
it was the Council’s legislative decision whether to act.
Packet Page 12 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 10
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT,
THAT THE COUNCIL NOT ACCEPT THE PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION AND
ADOPT THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY MR. UNDERHILL.
Council President Plunkett referred to the fourth criteria, the subject parcels are physically suitable for the
requested land use designation(s), pointing out this criteria had been met as evidenced by the statement in the
staff report that the subject area itself is physically suitable for the requested land use designation. With regard
to the third criteria, does the proposed amendment maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the city,
he pointed out this criteria had been met as evidenced by the statement in the staff report that changing the
designation of a portion of one street from “Mixed Use Commercial” to “Single Family Urban 1” did not
significantly affect the overall balance of land use in the City.
With regard to the second criteria, is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public interest and the first
criteria, is the proposed amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the public interest, Council
President Plunkett concluded the proposed amendment was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He
referred to pages 49, 50, 59 and 66 that reference Comprehensive Plan language regarding preserving older
stock, diversity, affordability, and access to facilities, goals this proposed amendment achieved. He concluded
the amendment met the four criteria.
Councilmember Orvis expressed support for the motion. With regard to the first criteria, he found it was met,
referring to Mr. Underhill’s comment regarding affordable housing. As a resident of the east side of Edmonds
himself, he noted that area provided more affordable housing for Edmonds residents. With regard to the second
criteria, he noted there were no engineering objections to the proposed amendment. With regard to the third
criteria, he noted if the amendment were approved, there would be business, single family, multi family, and
public uses mixed together, similar to downtown. He noted there were other pockets of similar zoning
throughout the City. He disagreed with the finding that the proposed amendment would result in an island. He
also found the amendment met the fourth criteria.
Councilmember Dawson stated this was a difficult decision, acknowledging there were many areas in Edmonds
and other cities where redevelopment would best serve the interests of the community. An interesting thing
about this neighborhood was that although the zoning designation had existed for some time, the neighborhood
had not redeveloped. She noted there were many examples throughout Snohomish County of neighborhoods
that were ripe for redevelopment that were in a state of blight and where it would clearly be in the best interest
of the public for them to be redeveloped. This neighborhood, although adjacent to more aggressively
zoned/developed areas, continues to exist and improvements are made by the residents which showed the zoning
should be consistent with the way the neighborhood currently exists, not the way the City might like to see it
developed. There was value to having a mix of uses in the City. She acknowledged she would not be
sympathetic to the neighbors’ objection to nearby development due to their single family designation,
anticipating the surrounding area may develop more aggressively. If this neighborhood was able to co-exist
with that development and continue to thrive, it was a value to the community. She agreed with Councilmember
Orvis’ comment regarding the importance of affordable housing stock in the community. She found the
proposed amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and expressed her support for the motion.
Although he understood the residents’ reluctance to have their neighborhood developed multi family as it would
degrade the neighborhood, Councilmember Wambolt indicated he would not support the motion. He reiterated
it was not as if the properties were being condemned for multi family; the fate of the properties was entirely in
the hands of the owners. He did not support the motion and was in favor of supporting the recommendation of
the Planning Board.
Councilmember Wilson agreed this presented a difficult question to the Council. He noted the Planning Board
did its job, determining that the request did not match the Comprehensive Plan. Although it could be debated
whether or not the proposed amendment met the criteria, it was ultimately a question of vision. He would
support the amendment due to the importance of affordable housing and because this neighborhood was a prime
example of where citizens had maintained their homes and used the system to achieve their goal. Although
Packet Page 13 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 11
there was reason to uphold the Planning Board’s recommendation, his vision included strong neighborhoods
such as this. He expressed his support for the motion.
Councilmember Olson indicated she did not support the motion. She agreed with Councilmember Wambolt that
the neighborhood would not be redeveloped unless the residents sold their homes and pointed out the
neighborhood had the same land use designation for a long time and no redevelopment had occurred.
Councilmember Dawson noted the issue was how the Council wanted that neighborhood to develop. She found
maintaining the neighborhood in the current manner would be consistent with her vision for the city and it was
appropriate to maintain those uses.
MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT AND COUNCILMEMBER OLSON
OPPOSED.
Mr. Snyder asked whether Councilmember Bernheim intended for the motion to cover the entire neighborhood,
recalling there were two properties that asked to be removed. Councilmember Bernheim clarified it was his
intent to include the entire area. Councilmember Wilson commented his understanding that upholding the
applicant’s request to deny the Planning Board’s recommendation did not include the two properties that asked
to be removed. Mr. Bowman clarified the request included the two properties; they requested to be removed,
however, the application applied to all the properties.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the neighborhood was a logical, integral whole. That was the character
that the application and he intended to maintain and not to allow two properties to be developed as commercial
or mixed use. He noted zoning was a legislative power and similar to property owners who were adversely
affected when large condominiums were constructed in their view, property owners may be adversely affected
when the City Council voted to retain a neighborhood the way it had developed. He noted there was room in the
Comprehensive Plan for changes that value the present use as the best use.
As the seconder to the motion, Council President Plunkett advised it was his understanding the motion included
the entire neighborhood.
COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
RECONSIDER THE MOTION.
Councilmember Wilson pointed out the Planning Board did not make a recommendation regarding the two
properties on 76th who asked not to have their zoning changed; therefore the Council would be doing something
extraordinary. He noted it was common in the Comprehensive Plan to have zoning on an arterial that allowed
mixed use or commercial on properties that abut a residential area and therefore it would be applicable in this
area. He suggested allowing a revote to reaffirm the Council’s approval of a change for all the properties with
the exception of the two properties who specifically asked not to be changed. Councilmember Dawson clarified
these properties were not being rezoned; the Comprehensive Plan was being updated and a rezone would follow.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBER WILSON AND
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT AND
COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, BERNHEIM, WAMBOLT, DAWSON OPPOSED.
6. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF THE UNOPENED ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LOCATED BETWEEN 8TH AVENUE NORTH AND 9TH AVENUE NORTH, NORTH OF DALEY
STREET.
Development Services Director Duane Bowman questioned whether the Council had received all the materials
that Eric Thuesen provided. Mayor Haakenson advised the Council had received a 40-page letter from Mr.
Thuesen tonight. Mr. Bowman distributed additional information received this afternoon from Mr. Theusen.
City Attorney Scott Snyder suggested proceeding with the hearing and if the Council deems the new material
Packet Page 14 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 12
worthy of review, they could consider continuing the hearing. Mr. Bowman noted the Council also received a
letter from Jim Wold.
Councilmember Dawson advised the information she just received included correspondence with her husband’s
law firm and she did not find it appropriate for her to participate if her husband’s law firm were potentially
involved in litigation regarding this matter. She recused herself and left the room.
Mr. Bowman recalled on June 24, 2008, the City Council passed Resolution No. 1178 initiating this vacation
action. He displayed an aerial photograph and identified the property owned by Mr. Thuesen that was currently
developed with a single family house and a small detached garage in the east corner. He also identified the 7.5
foot unopened alley right-of-way located north of Daley Street, between 8th Avenue North and 9th Avenue
North, identifying the area where the alley was used for access as well as the Wold and Olson residences and 9th
Avenue. He explained the Wolds had an easement across properties 847 and 853. He identified the portion of
the alley to the west where the topography was very steep and displayed a topography map that identified the
contours of the block between 8th and 9th.
Mr. Bowman displayed a drawing of the 800 block of Daley Street prepared by Jim Wold that illustrated uses
along the alley. The alley was created with the original plat of Edmonds and had never been used by the City.
It was originally intended when the area to the north subdivided that the other half of the alley would be
dedicated to the City which never happened. The alley had never been used with exception of the east portion.
He noted the Wolds (third property on the southeast side of the alley) had a private easement across the other
two properties on the southeast side of the alley, providing that property access from the alley as well as the
easement. He identified the Olson property (on the northeast end of the alley) which had access to their garage
from 9th Avenue. He identified the location of the new house on the Thuesen property and a garage in the
southeast corner, advising Mr. Thuesen had preliminary subdivision approval to create two additional lots.
Mr. Bowman relayed the criteria that the Council must consider for an alley vacation, a) the vacation is in the
public interest, and b) no property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation. He pointed out the
Reidy’s primary vehicle access was via Daley. The recently approved short plat for the Thuesen property allows
a lot in the center of his property. It was originally a two-lot subdivision; however, following a court case, Mr.
Thuesen was allowed to reapply and he received approval for a three lot subdivision. He displayed the approved
preliminary plat for the short subdivision of the Thuesen property, identifying the existing house, a center lot
with access via an access easement to 8th Avenue and a third lot on the western end. He displayed the
conceptual development plan reviewed as part of the short subdivision, identifying the existing home at the east
end with a detached garage, the generalized location of the home on the center lot that did not utilize the 7.5 foot
alley for its access, and the third house with access onto 8th.
With regard to the first criteria, the vacation is in the public interest, Mr. Bowman advised the City had no
planned or existing improvements in the alleyway. It would be in the public interest to vacate the right-of-way
and return it to the tax rolls. Regarding the second criteria, no property will be denied access as a result of the
vacation, he advised access was currently available to all properties. The most likely issue would be the Olsons
access to their garage via the alley which he explained could be accomplished via an exchange of easement by
the property owners to the south granting access over the existing alleyway. He concluded no property was
deprived of direct access or uses the alley for access. With regard to compensation, staff did not recommend
any compensation for the recommended right-of-way, it came from the properties to the south and vacating the
unused right-of-way reduced the City’s liability for any of the existing unused conditions.
Council President Plunkett asked whether there was a pending lawsuit. Mr. Bowman advised there was no
lawsuit, only a threat of a lawsuit. City Attorney Scott Snyder clarified the Council was not giving the property
away, the City would simply vacate its interest, the property goes where it goes by operation of the law. Title
issues were not part of the Council’s role; the Council’s only considerations were whether the vacation was in
the public interest and ensuring no one was denied direct access as a result of the vacation.
Packet Page 15 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 13
Pointing out the materials Mr. Thuesen provided referenced legal action and a Councilmember chose not to
participate due to potential legal action, Council President Plunkett was uncertain what legal activity surrounded
this matter. Mr. Bowman explained the City was involved in a lawsuit with Mr. Thuesen during the subdivision
of his property regarding the wetland area; Mr. Thuesen prevailed and the court decision allowed him to apply
for the third lot on the property and fill the wetlands. The other issue was the Reidys have a small shed on the
rear of their property that encroaches into the alleyway and a corner that projects onto Mr. Thuesen’s property.
The City began an enforcement action to compel the Reidys to move their shed out of the City’s right-of-way.
The Reidys chose to pursue the vacation request and prevailed in the Council initiating the vacation request. He
attempted to get the Reidys and Mr. Thuesen to work out an agreement to rectify the situation; Mr. Thuesen
would like to use the alley for a retaining wall to improve the access to his third lot; the Reidys want to preserve
their shed. The parties were unable to reach an agreement and Mr. Thuesen was opposed to the alley vacation
and the Reidys want to pursue the vacation to allow them to reclaim the property.
Mr. Snyder explained the City may grant a temporary encroachment permit to use the public right-of-way;
absent that permit the City had a right to compel removal of any object in the public right-of-way. The only way
the shed could remain would be if the City vacated the right-of-way.
Mayor Haakenson referred to Mr. Thuesen’s 40+ page document that states approval of any alley vacation will
result in suit for damages from the petitioner against the City. Mr. Snyder trusted the Council to apply the
criteria and he would defend a lawsuit if necessary.
Councilmember Bernheim referenced Mr. Snyder’s comment that it was the duty of the City to compel the
removal of the shed, pointing out to the east there were fences, landscaping and other structures in the right-of-
way. Mr. Snyder acknowledged much of the unopened rights-of-way in the City were occupied by fences,
landscaping and structures. The City acts on complaint; when a complaint was received, the City must
investigate and take necessary action.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. He advised the Council had
received a 40-page and a 10-page letter from Mr. Thuesen and a letter from Jim Wold.
Laurie Niven, Edmonds, expressed her support for vacating the alley with no compensation to the City.
Although she did not know everyone’s opinion with regard to the vacation, she urged that whatever the decision,
there not be any divisiveness among the neighbors and that access to garages be maintained.
Jim Wold, Edmonds, was uncertain whether the easement to his property from 9th Avenue was legally
established. He explained the builder who built the five homes along Daley Street from 9th to 8th lived in the
house he now owned. He assumed at that time the builder moved the fence line back of the two houses between
his house and 9th Avenue North to provide access to his garage. In the late 1960’s the owner prior to the Olsons
removed their original garage and built a garage on the back accessible only by the 7.5 foot right-of-way and the
“easement” developed by the builder. Those two homes were the only ones using the right-of-way. When he
moved in they removed the garage in the rear and replacing the pad with landscaping. He noted he still used the
right-of-way and easement on occasion for transporting landscaping materials. He concluded the alleyway was
not essential for him and he was in favor of the vacation.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, commented 118 years had passed and the City had not established any public use for the
7.5 foot unopened alley right-of-way between 8th and 9th and the City has no future plans for the right-of-way.
He found it in the City’s best interest as well as the public’s best interest to vacate the right-of-way, pointing out
public rights-of-way must be maintained by the City for the safety and convenience of the public. He was
unaware of any City maintenance of the right-of-way; its unmaintained condition coupled with the steepness of
the slope created an unnecessary liability for the City and managing a right-of-way was a burden to the City
requiring additional administrative effort to monitor its status. The public would benefit from vacation of the
Packet Page 16 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 14
right-of-way by the property being subject to property taxes. He noted in 1980 via ordinance 15 feet of the
right-of-way was vacated. In 1993 using this vacation the prior owner of his home purchased the 15 foot section
of the right-of-way. He concluded the alley right-of-way was not continuous to 8th as the first 15 feet were
privately owned. He supported the vacation of the remaining 7.5 feet of unopened alley right-of-way. He noted
the status of his shed was separate from the issue of vacation and assured the shed would be removed.
Eric Thuesen, Edmonds, commented the issue was not the vacation of the entire alley but only the unused
portion where the two arrows meet on Mr. Wold’s drawing; the other portion of the alley had been in use since
1956. He provided background on his property, explaining after purchasing the property in 2004, he applied for
a short plat utilizing a portion of the alley for access; the final approved short plat shows use of the alley. In
July 2007 a construction survey revealed the Reidy’s shed encroached onto the alley. He filed a complaint with
the City against the encroachment due to his intent to utilize the alley. Engineering plans he received after
receiving the short plat approval in July 2007 showed the use of the alley for access to the first lot. That was
approved by the Engineering Department with the exception of an encroachment permit, needed to build a
retaining wall in an alley. The retaining wall encroachment permit was not granted; the wall could not be
constructed until an encroachment permit was finalized and issued for the structure encroaching into the alley.
He referred to conversations in early July 2007 with the Reidys attorney and his request that the City pursue
code enforcement to remove the shed. He filed an objection to the proposed vacation of the alley and referred to
Section 20.70.040B that states the City cannot proceed with vacation if 50% or more of the property abutting the
street or alley file written objection. He advised he had a vested interest due to the approved building permit
that included alley access. He was opposed to the alley vacation, finding it a violation of his vested rights and
20.70.040B.
Mr. Snyder commented in a vacation, the City could reserve easements and still vacate the property. He asked
whether the Council reserving an easement for embankments or retaining walls would address his issue. Mr.
Thuesen answered his problem was with Mr. Reidy’s shed which Mr. Reidy had elected not to remove. He
noted the retaining wall would be used to support the land; the roadway would be adjacent to the retaining wall.
Mr. Snyder concluded from Mr. Thuesen’s comments that a portion of his access road would be within the 7.5
foot alley right-of-way. Mr. Thuesen agreed, explaining because of the Reidy’s shed, he had to make
adjustments to move the retaining wall out of the right-of-way. He objected to the vacation as it did not resolve
the problem of the Reidy’s shed.
Greg Olson, Edmonds, whose property was on the northeast corner of the alley, explained his objectives were
to, 1) maintain access to his garage, 2) improve the safety and security of the alley, and 3) prevent any increase
in traffic or parking in the alley. He noted their original garage was moved to the rear when their home was
remodeled in 1967 and their sole access to the garage was via the alley. The previous owner granted a
permanent easement to Mr. Thuesen on the north side of this property which provides access to the buildings on
the 509 9th Avenue North property. He requested a permanent easement be granted on the alley right-of-way to
retain access to his garage. He used the access on a daily basis and it was used occasionally by Mr. Wold; he
wanted to prevent any further parking by the buildings to the west. He noted the fences on both sides of the
alley were quite low and the owners at 853, 847 and 841 Daley as well as he were best equipped to ensure the
safety and security of the alley. He expressed support for vacation of the alley.
Forest Wold, Edmonds, urged the Council to favorably consider vacation of the right-of-way, commenting it
made economic and public policy sense.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
Council President Plunkett asked whether with some thought/time there would be a way to allow the retaining
wall to be built and the right-of-way vacated in the future. Mr. Snyder requested this matter be continued to
allow staff to consider the material submitted tonight and to compare the plat approvals to determine what was
Packet Page 17 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 15
vested. If there are prescriptive rights, that was for the court to decide. He suggested the Council ask any
questions and ensure the record accurately reflected what rights are vested under plat approvals.
Councilmember Wilson commented the packet Council received on Friday did not include the 40-page letter
Mr. Thuesen provided tonight. He agreed with Mr. Snyder’s suggestion to continue the matter to a later date to
provide the Council and staff an opportunity to consider all the material. He asked about the comment that the
Reidy property included the first 15-feet of the alley from 8th Avenue North. Mr. Bowman answered his
research revealed there were some street and alley vacations done but it was not clear that the alley was vacated
and the survey submitted by the Reidys did not show the alley as part of their property. The ordinance that did
the original vacation on 8th Avenue and the ordinance that vacated the portion on the east side where the Reidy’s
is located does not affirm in fact that 7.5 feet on the westerly portion of the alley was vacated. The east 15 feet
of 8th Avenue was in fact vacated.
Mr. Bowman referred to Council Resolution No. 474, dated August 19, 1980, that shows 100 feet plus 7.5 feet.
Unfortunately the ordinance did not show this same drawing that vacated the east 15 feet of 8th Avenue North
and he requested an opportunity to research the matter further. He agreed the Council may need to continue the
matter, noting some of the parties may not be able to attend a meeting until late August or early September. Mr.
Snyder agreed with Mr. Thuesen that the code states the City shall not proceed with the vacation if the owners
of 50% or more of the property abutting the street or alley or part thereof object. He recommended the record
accurately reflect the abutting property ownership.
Mr. Bowman disagreed with Mr. Thuesen’s assertion that only a portion of the alley was proposed to be
vacated, the proposal was to vacate the entire alley between 8th and 9th Avenue. The neighbors have discussed
establishing easements on the portion identified on Mr. Wold’s drawing as in use since 1956 (the east end of the
alley). Mr. Snyder agreed a written staff opinion would be helpful.
Mayor Haakenson encouraged the Council to ask any questions and staff would provide a report with answers to
their questions at a later date. Following a brief discussion regarding scheduling and availability of property
owners, Council President Plunkett agreed to schedule the matter as time was available on the agenda. Mr.
Snyder suggested continuing the public hearing to allow the property owners to comment on staff’s response.
Councilmember Wilson asked if this vacation arose due to the location of the Reidy’s shed. Mayor Haakenson
explained the neighbors contacted him to discuss issues of access to their property. Staff and he cannot bring a
vacation request to the Council; it must be generated by the Council. Councilmembers Wambolt and Olson met
with the neighbors and proposed the vacation. He advised the Reidy’s shed was a separate issue. Mr. Bowman
explained when a complaint was filed regarding the Reidy’s shed, the options were to remove the shed or vacate
the right-of-way; a portion of the shed would be required to be removed even if the alley were vacated. Mayor
Haakenson explained the neighbors on both sides of the east side end of the alley inquired about vacating the
alley due to concern with access to their property and concerns with parking in the alley when houses were
constructed to the west. Councilmember Wilson advised he would defer any further questions until staff
provided a written report.
Councilmember Bernheim commented Mr. Thuesen’s submission of materials was timely; he was entitled to
present material at the hearing. For Councilmember Bernheim, Mr. Snyder explained the City owned a right-of-
way easement and did not own the underlying fee. When the City vacated the easement, the property reverted to
the owner of the underlying fee. In most cases it was to the middle of the roadway, however, when the entire
dedication originally came from the same tract of land, it reverted to those properties. It would appear it would
revert to the owners of the property in the original Town map.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether there was any basis for Mr. Thuesen’s assertion that he owned 50% of
the property abutting the property to be vacated. Mr. Snyder wanted to ensure the record clarified the
Packet Page 18 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 16
application and Mr. Thuesen’s abutting ownership. Councilmember Bernheim asked Mr. Snyder to research
whether the middle lot in the subdivision would have direct access. Mr. Snyder noted another issue was vesting.
Mayor Haakenson advised the hearing would be continued to a date as yet unknown. Mr. Bowman advised the
hearing would be re-advertised and the property owners notified.
Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess. Councilmember Dawson returned to the dais.
7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Rick Senderoff, Edmonds, objected to Councilmember Wambolt’s guest view in the Edmonds Beacon, finding
it used subjective and speculative language that did not necessarily contribute to productive public discourse and
discouraged a good faith effort by citizens to find a solution to an ongoing Edmonds issue when developers
obtain properties critical to the city’s future without intending to develop until building codes were changed.
The old Safeway and Skippers properties were critical due to their proximity to the waterfront and the business
core; leaving them undeveloped did not produce revenue, present additional business opportunities nor provide
quality of life benefits. He objected to Councilmember Wambolt’s use of the term “small group” noting that a
small group of citizens represented a large constituency who supported him in the past election, support that was
largely due to his position against changing building heights, a position he now appeared to reject. He noted
during the open public forum, 19 citizens expressed their support for exploring the option of acquiring the
properties so that the City might develop a plan with vision. Further, over 100 individuals donated over $4,000
to benefit students who designed plausible alternative solutions. Not a single Edmonds resident expressed
support for any other option including an owner-driven or City-driven master plan without ownership of the
property. He concluded it appeared Councilmember Wambolt had sided with developers who wanted to
redevelop the property with taller buildings than were currently allowed. He objected to Councilmember
Wambolt’s reference to other ballot measures and financial issues facing Stevens Hospital and other public
interests, summarizing Edmonds residents were aware there were difficult choices to be made but continue to
invest in themselves, their property and community. He urged the Council to consider and research all options.
Don Hall, Edmonds, proposed the City consider the plastic bag issue, recalling the Seattle City Council passed
a resolution regarding plastic bags although he did not agree with charging a fee for a plastic bag. He was
opposed to plastic bags due to their impact on marine life, killing 100,000 marine animals and 2 million birds
per year. He noted China was eliminating all thin plastic bags, Australia was phasing out plastic bags by year
end and other cities were imposing laws regarding plastic bags. He cited new products that replace plastic bags
including bio-bags for composting. He recognized Petosa’s and other stores downtown for discontinuing the use
of plastic bags, advising bio-bags were available in several downtown stores. He urged consumers to request
stores eliminate plastic bags.
Rick Gifford, Edmonds, land use counsel for the 555 Main Street site and the property owners Rick Kent and
Mark Trumper, explained they propose to develop a mixed use commercial office building at 555 Main Street as
their business was outgrowing their space in Harbor Square. They were here tonight regarding the new BD1
zone in which this property was located. He advised they attended last week’s Council meeting where
information was introduced by staff but they did not have an opportunity to respond. He asserted the Council
was pressed to take action without opportunity to be accurately and fully briefed, a process that had ripple
affects that created additional problems and further ambiguities. He noted the contemplated project at 555 Main
had been designed with an emphasis on the needs of his clients’ business, the code language, and the underlying
philosophy of the City’s plans for its retail corridor as expressed in the BD1 code. In discussions with planning
staff, they were encouraged to submit a code interpretation request to assist staff in assessing the project, the
first for review under the BD1. Although they did not find a code interpretation necessary nor justified, they
complied with staff’s suggestion. They received a surprising interpretation followed by the late night marathon
Council meeting last week. Now the Council was preparing to adopt an unnecessary interim ordinance even
Packet Page 19 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 17
though the plain language of the code was clear, the as yet unsubmitted project conforms with the code and there
was no urgency for the Council to act in a precipitous manner.
Mr. Gifford requested the Council reconsider its request for an interim ordinance which would rewrite the
existing BD1 code to require 15-foot ceilings to the back of a building. He found it a mistake to rush to a
stopgap solution without first examining the purposes to be served and the irreparable harm such a short term
action may have on his clients’ business, other businesses, and the City’s planning and economic objectives. He
urged the Council to consider the underlying issues in this first practical test of the BD1 zoning ordinance and
address those issues with a more considered approach to “fix” the code. His clients had worked hard to properly
apply the City’s BD1 code and persisted with the city to accomplish other objectives such as possibly preserving
the existing residential structure. They were committed to continuing to work with the City in good faith to
accomplish their vision for the site in accordance with all applicable policies, codes and guidelines. They
believed the design concept that started this process met and exceeded BD1 code requirements and fulfilled the
spirit in the provisions - great storefront retail on Main Street, upscale and green commercial space with alley
access to below ground off-street parking to keep cars off the street and places for customers to shop. The
building would also provide an exciting new home for an indigenous business with local ownership. He urged
Council to decline the proposed interim ordinance and recommend to staff that the BD1 code interpretation be
withdrawn. His clients were willing to retract their request for a code interpretation if necessary to accomplish
this and withdraw their pending appeal to the Hearing Examiner regarding the code interpretation, allowing
them to proceed in due course with design, planning and application to the City for their proposed project.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
David Thorpe, Edmonds, clarified his reference last week during the nuisance hearing regarding friends that
lived next to a hoarder that they lived in Lynnwood. He spoke in favor of a process that allowed the Council to
establish clear priorities that met short and long term goals, a necessary first step for staff, Council and Edmonds
citizens so that clear and concise decisions could be made. He noted with regard to the Downtown Waterfront
Activity Area, information was spotty and not clear or concise. As the property was not listed for sale, he
questioned whether the City was wasting time and resources. With a long and short term priority list and details
of actions and expenses, the pros and cons of each item could be discussed. He commented on how Bellevue
had grown from a bedroom community to a world class city. He pointed out the impact of transforming the
former Eastside Catholic School site into the Downtown Park; Bellevue Square was previously 1-2 stories and
open air, it was now a covered mall with no personality. The park did not generate money and density
downtown was increasing; Edmonds was not in that league. He disagreed with Councilmember Wilson’s
comment last week about more realistic, less ambitious, preferring preserve and foster, not protect and limit. He
noted the community recently passed the EMS levy, supported the school levy and may soon be asked to
increase funding for Stevens Hospital along with other projects. He urged the Council to lead and supply
accurate information to allow citizens to make good decisions on future expenditures.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled rain barrels were approved via the adoption of an interim ordinance, an
action he viewed as a mistake. He expressed concern with the location of the garbage enclosure in the setback
at the PCC site which Mr. Bowman indicated was approved last year and did not require ADB review because it
was such a small project. Next, he reminded the public the Planning Board would be discussing parking of
recreational vehicles on Wednesday, July 23. He advised the following were considered recreational vehicles:
travel trailers, folding tent trailers, motor vehicle trailers, campers, a canopy removed from a truck or boat, boat,
boat trailer, snowmobile or snowmobile trailer, and other similar conveyances. He noted under the proposed
regulations, residents would be limited on the number of vehicles and where they could be parked. He also
thanked Bob Gregg for not building a third floor, noting the building looked great. Mr. Hertrich likes the design
and the color, and noted Old Milltown was back.
Packet Page 20 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 18
8. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 16.43 BD (DOWNTOWN
BUSINESS) ZONES.
Mr. Bowman explained this was the result of Council discussion and direction regarding interpretation of the
BD1 zone. Two versions of the interim zoning ordinance were prepared to address the issues of the
interpretation of what the Council meant in regard to the ground floor in the BD1 zone. He explained an interim
zoning ordinance was a tool available to the Council; the Council could adopt one of the ordinances drafted by
the City Attorney or state an alternate position. He noted an interim ordinance required a public hearing within
60 days of passage and referral to the Planning Board for review and recommendation to the Council. Mr.
Snyder explained the purpose of an interim zoning ordinance was to preserve the status quo. Two versions of
the ordinance were provided, one with an emergency clause making it immediately effective and the other
without the emergency clause.
Councilmember Dawson reiterated the statement she made last week, that this was what the Council thought
they were doing when they adopted the ordinance. She was uncertain now whether it was the wisest decision or
whether the Council considered it but she did not recall the Council had any intent other than this. She noted
this was an example of unintended consequences and she was not convinced that the result on this property or
other properties would be the best course of action. Mr. Bowman commented there seemed to be consensus on
the Council that the ground floor was all commercial. He referred to excerpts from the Planning Board and
Council minutes regarding the discussion regarding BD1. If the Council was uncertain they wanted the entire
ground floor to be commercial, he suggested the Council provide alternate direction.
Councilmember Dawson commented it appeared this could be a very good project and she was not opposed to
allowing that to happen, but she was uncertain what options were available to the Council. She reiterated it was
clear from the Council’s previous deliberations that they did not intend to have anything other than commercial
on the ground floor. Mr. Snyder agreed there was never any discussion of any other uses in the back on the
ground floor. He noted if the situation were left open and a development permit were submitted, the Council
would be considering it as a quasi judicial body in a much more limited situation with a much more expensive
potential. He also pointed out the potential that the back portion of the ground floor would be unregulated,
which was not what he envisioned the Council intended.
Councilmember Dawson advised she was not inclined to adopt an interim zoning ordinance, noting although it
was likely the Council’s intent at the time, it may not be direction the Council would have taken if they, staff or
the community had thought about it. Mr. Bowman advised the property owners requested a code interpretation
and presented a good argument that the Council did not envision a 15-foot ceiling height for parking and
questioning whether the Council intended for there to be a split of a 15-foot ceiling height.
Assuming there were four Councilmembers who wanted to adopt a different version, Councilmember Dawson
asked the fastest way to put something in place that would suit the needs of the property owner, the Council and
the community and not result in litigation. Mr. Snyder suggested setting a baseline with regard to what the
Council thought they were doing and refer it to the Planning Board and bring changes back via an interim
zoning ordinance. Mr. Bowman agreed an interim zoning ordinance would be the best route as it would allow
the property owner to move forward, establish the Council’s direction and refer the matter to the Planning
Board. Councilmember Dawson concluded from Mr. Bowman’s comments that staff would bring back a
different interim zoning ordinance at a later date. Mr. Snyder commented that left the door open to an
application. Councilmember Dawson commented the Council would need to rely on the property owners not to
submit an application and sue the City and to accept that the City was making a good faith effort to address their
needs. She asked if staff could return with a different interim zoning ordinance. Mr. Bowman agreed staff
could, with Council direction.
Mr. Snyder expressed concern with designing an ordinance around a project. Councilmember Dawson
commented this issue highlighted that the Council, staff or Planning Board did not think about this issue at the
Packet Page 21 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 19
time of their original discussion. Mayor Haakenson suggested the Council give staff direction regarding what
they would like in an interim zoning ordinance.
Councilmember Bernheim commented he was not necessarily supportive of a mandatory 15-foot ceiling for the
entire floor and did not support enacting an ordinance that requires that. He suggested referring this to the
Planning Board to examine the staff interpretation and the proposed ordinances and determine if they were
appropriate to clarify the matter. He was satisfied with a 45-foot depth, noting a depth of 60-feet with a 15-foot
ceiling was unnecessary. He was willing to live with the existing code and risk the submittal of an application.
Council President Plunkett commented the idea being discussed was considered in zones other than BD1.
Although he understood the Council’s intent in BD1, he was satisfied with 12-15 foot ceilings going back X
square feet and allowing a great deal of flexibility behind that depth. He suggested the best method would be
via an interim ordinance following review by the Planning Board.
Councilmember Wambolt commented the height limit was 25 feet; a building could only achieve 30 feet with
15-foot first floor in the BD1 zone. He noted the BD1 zone was crafted to be retail; however, the current
property owners wanted to construct a mixed use building with a significant amount of office space.
Rick Gifford, land use attorney for the property owners of 555 Main, explained the code mandates
commercial use in the BD1, retail was an allowed commercial use; nowhere in the BD1 did it mandate retail.
The structure of the design standards indicate street front retail was a high priority, which is the reason this
building was designed to provide that height in the retail space along the frontage of Main Street.
Councilmember Wambolt commented the Council hoped it would primarily be retail and recalled there was a
unanimous vote in support of the 15-foot ceiling height. He recalled the 15-foot ceiling height was desired so
that the building would be versatile. He noted the 15-foot ceiling height was from the floor to the ceiling height,
the finished ceiling height would be less than 15 feet. Although there was reference in the code to 30 feet, he
noted it did not apply to BD1.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Bowman referred to ECDC 16.43.030.B.6.c, which states in no case shall the depth of the commercial space
as measured from the street front of the building be less than 30 feet, which he noted applied to the BD1 zone.
Mr. Snyder expressed concern with complying with the public participation requirements of the GMA; an
interim zoning ordinance was a tool to establish a regulation and hold a public hearing at a later date. He was
concerned with opening the discussion because it was not on the agenda for public comment, there was no way
any member of the public could have known and there may be opposing viewpoints. He noted an interim
zoning ordinance was a tool to start a process not a tool to conclude it. Mayor Haakenson requested the Council
provide direction regarding what they wanted in an interim zoning ordinance.
Councilmember Orvis supported the Council passing Exhibit 2. If the Council wanted to address what could be
done in the back half of the building, it should be referred to the Planning Board to allow for a full public
process. The intent of this interim zoning ordinance was to clarify the Council’s intent; if the Council wanted to
change the policy, a full public process including a Planning Board hearing and public hearing before the
Council was appropriate. He noted the depth in BD2 and BD3 was 60 feet; he was unclear why less depth
would be allowed in BD1.
Council President Plunkett observed Councilmember Orvis apparently did not like the idea of an interim
ordinance, pointing out there would be a public hearing regarding the interim ordinance. Councilmember Orvis
hoped the intent of what the Council passed would be followed until the code were changed and that it would
not be changed on the fly without a public process. The intent of the ordinance he voted for was a commercial
Packet Page 22 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 20
floor with a 15-foot ceiling height all the way to the back and he did not want that changed without the full
participation of the public. If the Council wanted to allow more flexibility in the back half of the building in
BD1, it should be referred to the Planning Board. Mayor Haakenson suggested Councilmember Orvis provide
his logic for a 15-foot ceiling height all the way to the back.
Council President Plunkett assured the interim ordinance would follow due process. Councilmember Orvis
answered not in respect to this application; this application should follow the Council’s intent based on the code
that was adopted at the time. He pointed out BD1 is the most sensitive zone and he was unwilling to change the
intent of the code based on one application. Mayor Haakenson reminded this proposed applicant had not
requested any change; staff and he were seeking clarification regarding the Council’s intent. The property
owners have the opportunity to appeal staff’s decision.
Councilmember Wilson commented he understood the Council’s intent and supported allowing that to stand and
allowing an appropriate due process to change it as needed. If the Council did nothing, the property owners
could challenge staff’s interpretation via the appropriate legal avenues, a path he did not find the most amicable
way to achieve a good project in the most important zone. Another option would be to withdraw staff’s
interpretation and the property owners request for an interpretation and be in a position where there was
unregulated space, not what he believed the Council wanted. He noted a process would be required to pass any
interim ordinance and by the time it was concluded, there should be time to develop something good. He
commented the Council could do nothing tonight and move forward with due process which would allow the
possibility of litigation or pass the interim ordinance. He preferred to pass the interim ordinance in Exhibit 2
tonight that reflected the Council’s intent.
Councilmember Dawson commented at the time the ordinance was passed, the Council relied on the advice of
Mark Hinshaw and staff regarding what was needed to ensure space was usable to retail in the future and that
was the Council’s intent. The more she contemplated this, she was not convinced the 15-foot ceiling height was
necessary the entire depth of the building. As long as commercial was on the street front, she was uncertain
whether the uses in the back mattered. She agreed a certain depth was necessary to ensure the space could
always be utilized as commercial in the future. She was comfortable giving staff direction to return with an
interim ordinance that had commercial to a depth certain and the ceiling height appropriate for retail to a depth
certain and providing specifications for a corner lot. She assured this was not because of this specific project but
because the current discussions illustrated the limitations of the code as adopted.
Mayor Haakenson commented the BD1 zone also did not address what uses would be allowed behind the
commercial space and asked if Councilmember Dawson would be amenable to allowing commercial, office or
other use but not residential. Councilmember Dawson commented that was an issue that would need to be
discussed by the Council. She pointed out the intent was to design space that could be used for retail, not to
require the space be used for retail. She was comfortable with an interim ordinance that allowed commercial
space behind. Mayor Haakenson anticipated it was not the Council’s intent to have a 15-foot ceiling height for
parking, acknowledging parking was not required for commercial in the BD1 zone.
Although not on the Council at the time but as an observer, Councilmember Wilson observed most of the
community thought what the Council adopted was a 15-foot ceiling height throughout whether it was the right
policy or not. He found it reactionary to create something totally new on the fly even if a due process followed,
particularly if staff determined the Council’s intent. Mayor Haakenson assured staff was wiling to take on the
challenge. Councilmember Dawson clarified she did not disagree with staff’s interpretation of the ordinance as
it currently exists; that was the Council’s intent and what the ordinance says. She concluded perhaps the
Council’s intent was not the wisest decision and the Council should move in a different direction knowing what
it knew now.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the reason parking was not required in the BD1 zone was the Council was
lobbied by many citizens not to require parking. He recalled the concession for those who wanted increased
Packet Page 23 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 21
heights was not to require parking. He noted just because the lot was 120 feet in depth, the building was not
required to extend to the property line.
Councilmember Olson recalled at the time of the original discussion, the Council was thinking about BD1 in the
flat area, not on the hill. Because most of the lots in the flat area did not have much depth, this was never
discussed.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO REFER
THIS BACK TO THE STAFF TO COME BACK WITH A DIFFERENT INTERIM ORDINANCE THAT
DOES NOT RELY ON THE FULL FLOOR PRINCIPLE BUT ALLOWED ADDITIONAL
FLEXIBILITY IN TERMS OF THE DEPTH OF THE GROUND FLOOR WITH 15-FOOT CEILING
HEIGHT.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the reason he did not support implementing the intent of the past Council
was because he did not believe that was what the current code states. He did not agree with that policy and there
was no reason to implement it if the Council was not comfortable with it. He clarified the ground floor was the
floor with the entry on the street.
Councilmember Orvis indicated he would not support the motion as any change to the Council’s original intent
should be via the Planning Board process.
Council President Plunkett expressed support for the principle but he found Councilmember Orvis’ point about
going to the Planning Board compelling and a better representation of the process utilized when the zone was
created and a better way of respecting the public’s wishes.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4) COUNCILMEMBERS DAWSON, OLSON AND
BERNHEIM IN FAVOR; COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS,
WILSON AND WAMBOLT OPPOSED.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 11:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO ADOPT
THE INTERIM ORDINANCE IN EXHIBIT 1 AND REFER THE ISSUE WITH THE COUNCIL’S
COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING BOARD. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3),
COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON, WAMBOLT AND ORVIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT
IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON, BERNHEIM, AND DAWSON OPPOSED. The ordinance
approved reads as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE TO CLARIFY THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 16.43 BD (DOWNTOWN BUSINESS)
TO CLARIFY AND SUPPLEMENT THE PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO THE GROUND FLOOR
REQUIREMENTS IN THE BD-1 ZONE, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE, AND PROVIDING
FOR AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE.
9A. RECONSIDERATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD LICENSE
APPLICATION FOR PROVINCE, INC., DBA FIVE SPICE BISTRO.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF THE DECISION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE AUGUST 18
MEETING REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF A LIQUOR LICENSE TO FIVE SPICE BISTRO.
Councilmember Dawson advised she would not support the motion to reconsider. The only way for the Council
to have any input to the Liquor Control Board regarding whether or not a license should be granted would be to
allow for a public hearing. The law provides for a public hearing in order to provide that feedback to the State.
Packet Page 24 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 22
Councilmember Wilson explained when he was asked to pull this item from the Consent Agenda, he believed it
was common practice which he later learned it was not. However, the principle upon which he acted was still
appropriate; anything the Council was asked to vote on as representatives of the citizenry, the public should
have an opportunity to voice their concerns. He understood from City Attorney Scott Snyder that there was
little to no impact on the decision made by the Washington State Liquor Control Board (WSLCB) and there was
only a narrow range of reasons for an applicant to be turned down. He cautioned the public it was unlikely they
could convince the WSLCB to do anything other than what they were already planning to do. He asked whether
the Council needed to vote on the list of liquor licenses to be granted and if so, it was appropriate to hold a
public hearing. If the Council did not need to vote, perhaps in the future the list could be presented as an update.
In this instance because the public was given the expectation that they would have an opportunity to comment
on August 18, it was appropriate to hold the public hearing. He asked what the Council’s role in the future
should be with regard to WSLCB licenses.
Councilmember Orvis commented because the Council gave the expectation that a public hearing would be
held, the Council should follow through. He acknowledged the Council did not have the authority to deny the
application but could state their opinions to the WSLCB.
Councilmember Wambolt suggested reconsidering the decision to hold a public hearing because the Council did
not have the facts at the time that decision was made. He clarified the Council had no role in granting/denying
liquor licenses, did not have to hold a public hearing and the WSLCB had signed the site since June 4.
MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT AND OLSON IN FAVOR.
Mayor Haakenson requested Mr. Snyder describe the Council’s role in the WSLCB request for information from
the City. Mr. Snyder suggested the Council packet include the WACs and criteria the WSLCB used to allow the
Council and the public to address the factors in which the WSLCB was interested.
Mayor Haakenson suggested the list of applications continue to be presented as they had been on the Consent
Agenda, noting this was the first time there had been a concern raised. Council President Plunkett commented
the process seemed to work, the item was pulled from the Consent Agenda and a public hearing was scheduled.
Councilmember Dawson suggested if the Council was not approving the list, it could be provided in a report on
the Consent Agenda which would provide an opportunity to comment and allow an opportunity to request a
public hearing. She noted the Council was simply acknowledging. She suggested clarifying for the public
whether the Council was voting on or merely accepting the list of business that had submitted an application for
a liquor license. Mr. Snyder advised he would provide the criteria to the Council and review the City’s
ordinance against the current WACs and provisions.
Councilmember Olson was concerned the public was being given a false impression that they would be able to
have an impact on the liquor license as a result of the public hearing. She recommended making it clear that the
public’s comments would probably not have an impact on the license.
9B. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS.
Council President Plunkett distributed information regarding the Hotel/Motel Tax Committee.
Councilmember Dawson reported the Sound Transit Board would be voting on Thursday whether to place a
ballot measure in the November 2008 election. She anticipated there would be enough votes to support a 15-
year plan that would bring light rail to Lynnwood and a 30% increase in bus service to Snohomish County as
well as improvements to the Edmonds and Mukilteo Sounder stations.
Councilmember Olson advised the South Snohomish County Cities group was meeting on Thursday.
Packet Page 25 of 426
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 22, 2008
Page 23
Councilmember Wambolt reported at their June 10 meeting, the Port Commission voted to repay 10% of the
loan to purchase the buildings at Harbor Square, the maximum they could prepay without penalty. The Port
Commission plans to start a Student Representative Program in September and they established their budget
schedule for 2009. At their July 14 meeting, the Port reviewed revised plans for the new restroom facility for
which they are hoping to obtain a grant. They were unsuccessful in obtaining a grant last year. They also
discussed the new law effective December 1, 2008 requiring that 2% of fuel sold be ethanol.
Councilmember Orvis, modeling his ski helmet, reported one of the events the Snohomish County Health
District Board sponsored was to check the installation of child safety seats. Another topic addressed by the
Board was the importance of helmets when skateboarding, skiing or bicycling. He urged all children to wear
helmets and urged all adults to persuade/make their child wear a helmet.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson referred to the request by Mr. Hall that the Council consider a ban on plastic bags, noting he
also received an email suggesting the Council ban bottled water at their meetings. He suggested the Council
consider both issues in the future.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Plunkett agreed the Council could consider their use of bottled water, recalling the Council
had discontinued the use of bottled water in the past.
Councilmember Wilson observed the passing of Warren Schweppe, a tremendous community leader, a 9-year
member of the Holy Rosary Church, former leader of the VFW, and past president of the Kiwanis. He
commented this was a loss of a tremendous citizen and expressed his sympathies to the family.
Councilmember Dawson announced next Tuesday was National Night out in Edmonds. She noted the Council
would also be meeting next Tuesday, the fifth Tuesday of the month.
Councilmember Wambolt commented on the PCC Market being rebuilt on the former Albertson’s property,
noting their mode of operation seemed to be that it was easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission. He
noted their cutting of the trees resulted in only a $500 fine, an amount he found inadequate and recommended
they be required to replant mature trees. Now an issue has been raised about the wall around the garbage
enclosure. He recalled when the Council discussed the rain barrel, it was unclear what material would be used
for the trash enclosure. He requested staff provide the Council an update with regard to the trash enclosure, the
tree removal and the rain barrel.
Mayor Haakenson referred to comments he received that the City must be excited about the new revenue
streams the City would receive from the new PCC. He pointed out PCC would only replace the revenue the
City lost when Albertson’s closed.
Mayor Haakenson commented that with the passing of Warren Schweppe and Walt Sellers the City lost two
great community leaders who would be missed.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 11:21 p.m.
Packet Page 26 of 426
AM-1692 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Kathleen Junglov Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #105682 through #105842 for July 24, 2008 in the amount of
$1,031,103.25.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2008
Revenue:
Expenditure:1,031,103.25
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $1,031,103.25
Attachments
Link: claim checks 07-24-08
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 07/24/2008 02:47 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 03:08 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 04:43 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/25/2008 08:34 AM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 07/24/2008 11:30
AM
Packet Page 27 of 426
Final Approval Date: 07/25/2008
Packet Page 28 of 426
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
1
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
6
8
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
4
4
9
3
G
I
S
P
O
R
T
S
14
4
1
5
9
TE
N
N
I
S
B
A
L
L
S
TE
N
N
I
S
B
A
L
L
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
85.50
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
7.69 Total :93.19
10
5
6
8
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
5
0
5
2
A
A
R
D
P
E
S
T
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
2
5
7
9
2
7
1-
1
3
9
9
2
PE
S
T
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
2
3
63.25
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
2
3
5.63 Total :68.88
10
5
6
8
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
4
2
8
6
A
D
V
A
N
C
E
D
O
O
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
I
N
C
9
0
5
9
SR
C
E
N
T
E
R
-
C
I
R
C
U
I
T
B
O
A
R
D
E
X
C
H
A
N
G
E
D
SR
C
E
N
T
E
R
-
C
I
R
C
U
I
T
B
O
A
R
D
E
X
C
H
A
N
G
E
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
243.75
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
21.69 Total :265.44
10
5
6
8
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
5
3
A
I
R
C
O
M
M
W
I
R
E
L
E
S
S
E
N
T
E
R
P
R
I
S
E
S
1
9
8
7
4
IN
V
#
1
9
8
7
4
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
BL
U
E
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
B
L
U
E
T
O
O
T
H
S
Y
S
T
E
M
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
434.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
33.85 Total :467.85
10
5
6
8
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
0
8
5
0
A
L
D
E
R
W
O
O
D
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
8
5
6
5
MO
N
T
H
L
Y
W
H
O
L
E
S
A
L
E
W
A
T
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
F
O
R
MO
N
T
H
L
Y
W
H
O
L
E
S
A
L
E
W
A
T
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
F
O
R
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
3
0
.
0
0
98,069.74 Total :98,069.74
10
5
6
8
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
1
5
4
0
A
L
L
I
E
D
W
A
S
T
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
0
1
9
7
-
0
0
0
9
8
3
5
0
8
F
I
R
E
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
2
0
FI
R
E
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
2
0
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
88.44 1 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
29
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
2
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
6
8
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
1
5
4
0
A
L
L
I
E
D
W
A
S
T
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
PU
B
L
I
C
W
O
R
K
S
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
01
9
7
-
0
0
0
9
8
3
5
9
9
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
21.31
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
80.96
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
80.96
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
80.96
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
80.96
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
80.94
ga
r
b
a
g
e
f
o
r
F
/
S
#
1
6
01
9
7
-
0
0
0
9
8
3
6
7
0
ga
r
b
a
g
e
f
o
r
F
/
S
#
1
6
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
105.74
ga
r
b
a
g
e
f
o
r
M
C
C
01
9
7
-
0
0
0
9
8
4
4
0
9
ga
r
b
a
g
e
f
o
r
M
C
C
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
52.61 Total :672.88
10
5
6
8
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
8
5
7
A
M
E
C
E
A
R
T
H
&
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
I
N
C
9
1
8
5
1
6
FA
C
A
S
B
E
S
T
O
S
P
R
O
F
S
V
C
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
-
6
/
2
8
/
0
8
FA
C
A
S
B
E
S
T
O
S
P
R
O
F
S
V
C
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
-
6
/
2
8
/
0
8
11
6
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
889.03 Total :889.03
10
5
6
8
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
6
0
2
5
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
,
A
N
G
I
E
AA
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
0
7
1
9
MO
N
I
T
O
R
T
R
A
I
N
I
N
G
PL
A
Z
A
R
O
O
M
&
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
E
N
T
E
R
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
30.00 Total :30.00
10
5
6
9
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
7
5
1
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
6
5
5
-
3
7
7
4
4
7
1
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
2 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
30
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
3
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
6
9
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
9
7
5
1
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
PA
R
K
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
34.04
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
3.03
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
65
5
-
3
7
8
3
3
8
8
PA
R
K
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
34.04
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
3.03 Total :74.14
10
5
6
9
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
7
5
1
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
6
5
5
-
3
7
8
3
3
8
7
18
3
8
6
0
0
1
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
101.04
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
8.99 Total :110.03
10
5
6
9
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
1
8
0
1
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
W
I
L
B
E
R
T
V
A
U
L
T
C
O
0
7
-
4
0
4
2
BU
R
I
A
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
BU
R
I
A
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
:
S
C
H
W
A
R
T
Z
E
13
0
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
3
6
.
2
0
0
.
3
4
0
.
0
0
641.00
BU
R
I
A
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
:
F
E
R
O
U
G
E
13
0
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
3
6
.
2
0
0
.
3
4
0
.
0
0
376.00
BU
R
I
A
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
:
L
E
E
13
0
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
3
6
.
2
0
0
.
3
4
0
.
0
0
376.00 Total :1,393.00
10
5
6
9
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
1
7
0
2
A
W
C
E
M
P
L
O
Y
B
E
N
E
F
I
T
T
R
U
S
T
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
8
AU
G
U
S
T
2
0
0
8
A
W
C
P
R
E
M
I
U
M
S
3 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
31
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
4
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
6
9
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
1
7
0
2
A
W
C
E
M
P
L
O
Y
B
E
N
E
F
I
T
T
R
U
S
T
08
/
0
8
F
i
r
e
P
e
n
s
i
o
n
A
W
C
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
61
7
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
0
0
4,372.20
08
/
0
8
R
e
t
i
r
e
e
s
A
W
C
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
00
9
.
0
0
0
.
3
9
0
.
5
1
7
.
3
7
0
.
2
3
0
.
0
0
25,172.60
08
/
0
8
G
a
y
d
o
s
A
W
C
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
6
.
1
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
0
0
1,108.13
08
/
0
8
A
W
C
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
81
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
1
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
278,938.62 Total :309,591.55
10
5
6
9
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
2
0
0
5
B
A
L
L
A
N
D
G
I
L
L
E
S
P
I
E
P
O
L
Y
G
R
A
P
H
2
0
0
8
-
5
6
1
IN
V
#
2
0
0
8
-
5
6
1
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
PR
E
-
E
M
P
L
O
Y
M
E
N
T
S
C
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
350.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
7.00 Total :357.00
10
5
6
9
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
1
9
B
E
A
C
H
C
A
M
P
L
L
C
BE
A
C
H
C
A
M
P
9
8
3
0
BE
A
C
H
C
A
M
P
@
S
U
N
S
E
T
B
A
Y
BE
A
C
H
C
A
M
P
@
S
U
N
S
E
T
B
A
Y
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
1,200.00 Total :1,200.00
10
5
6
9
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
5
2
5
7
B
E
Y
E
T
T
E
,
P
A
M
BE
Y
E
T
T
E
0
4
3
0
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
~
11
7
.
2
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
2,000.00 Total :2,000.00
10
5
6
9
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
2
5
0
0
B
L
U
M
E
N
T
H
A
L
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
C
O
I
N
C
6
7
2
7
9
0
-
0
1
IN
V
#
6
7
2
7
9
0
-
0
1
-
L
A
W
L
E
S
S
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
HO
L
S
T
E
R
/
L
A
W
L
E
S
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
44.95
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
4.05 4 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
32
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
5
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
6
9
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
2
5
0
0
B
L
U
M
E
N
T
H
A
L
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
C
O
I
N
C
IN
V
#
6
7
4
7
4
7
-
S
A
C
K
V
I
L
L
E
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
67
4
7
4
7
BA
L
L
I
S
T
I
C
V
E
S
T
/
J
.
S
A
C
K
V
I
L
L
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
699.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
62.91
IN
V
#
6
7
9
0
9
4
-
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
67
9
0
9
4
SL
-
2
0
X
-
L
E
D
A
C
F
L
A
S
H
L
I
G
H
T
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
107.96
LA
M
P
M
O
D
U
L
E
F
O
R
S
L
2
0
X
-
L
E
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
16.95
UL
T
R
A
S
T
I
N
G
E
R
/
2
0
X
P
-
L
E
D
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
24.95
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
13.49
IN
V
#
6
8
4
2
9
5
-
Y
A
M
A
N
E
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
68
4
2
9
5
BO
O
T
S
/
Y
A
M
A
N
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
156.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
14.04
IN
V
#
6
8
5
0
9
2
-
A
.
G
R
E
E
N
M
U
N
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
68
5
0
9
2
UN
I
F
O
R
M
P
A
N
T
S
/
T
U
R
T
L
E
N
E
C
K
,
E
T
C
.
(
O
F
F
I
C
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
245.90
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
22.13 Total :1,412.33
10
5
6
9
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
5
B
R
E
Z
N
E
N
,
A
L
Y
S
S
A
BR
E
Z
N
E
N
0
6
2
3
OU
T
D
O
O
R
V
O
L
L
E
Y
B
A
L
L
A
T
T
E
N
D
A
N
T
OU
T
D
O
O
R
V
O
L
L
E
Y
B
A
L
L
A
T
T
E
N
D
A
N
T
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
108.00 Total :108.00
10
5
6
9
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
5
6
B
R
I
N
S
C
H
W
I
T
Z
,
J
A
N
I
C
E
BR
I
N
S
C
H
W
I
T
Z
0
7
2
2
RE
F
U
N
D
CL
A
S
S
R
E
F
U
N
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
33.00 5 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
33
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
6
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :33.00
10
5
6
9
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
5
6
0
7
2
3
5
6
B
R
I
N
S
C
H
W
I
T
Z
,
J
A
N
I
C
E
10
5
7
0
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
1
9
6
6
C
A
M
P
F
I
R
E
B
O
Y
S
&
G
I
R
L
S
CA
M
P
F
I
R
E
9
5
0
3
BA
B
Y
S
I
T
T
I
N
G
C
L
A
S
S
E
S
BA
B
Y
S
I
T
T
I
N
G
B
A
S
I
C
S
#
9
5
0
3
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
420.00 Total :420.00
10
5
7
0
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
4
8
C
A
R
N
E
Y
,
C
R
A
I
G
&
J
U
L
I
E
3-
0
6
5
6
5
RE
:
1
-
0
8
0
6
-
0
2
4
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
R
E
F
U
N
D
#1
-
0
8
0
6
-
0
2
4
R
e
f
u
n
d
U
B
C
s
t
#
0
0
1
9
7
3
9
8
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
3
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
57.62 Total :57.62
10
5
7
0
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
3
5
1
0
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
W
E
L
D
I
N
G
S
U
P
P
L
Y
LY
1
3
3
4
3
2
W
A
T
E
R
-
C
A
R
B
O
N
D
I
O
X
I
D
E
F
E
E
S
W
A
T
E
R
-
C
A
R
B
O
N
D
I
O
X
I
D
E
F
E
E
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
41.18
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
3.67 Total :44.85
10
5
7
0
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
4
8
4
0
C
H
A
P
U
T
,
K
A
R
E
N
E
CH
A
P
U
T
9
4
6
8
FR
I
D
A
Y
N
I
G
H
T
O
U
T
FR
I
D
A
Y
N
I
G
H
T
O
U
T
#
9
4
6
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
90.30 Total :90.30
10
5
7
0
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
1
C
H
I
L
D
R
E
N
'
S
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
CH
I
L
D
T
E
C
H
9
4
3
9
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
S
CH
I
L
D
R
E
N
'
S
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
#
9
4
4
0
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
2,080.00
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
#
9
4
3
9
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
1,664.00 Total :3,744.00
10
5
7
0
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
3
8
2
C
I
N
T
A
S
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
46
0
1
9
3
1
1
4
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
Vo
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
4
1
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
20.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
4
1
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
1.78 6 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
34
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
7
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
0
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
6
3
8
2
C
I
N
T
A
S
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
3
1
1
5
St
n
.
1
6
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
105.58
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
9.39
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
4
2
3
1
St
n
.
1
7
-
A
L
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
6
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
111.29
St
n
.
1
7
-
O
P
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
111.30
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
6
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
9.91
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
9.90
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
4
2
5
2
St
n
.
2
0
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
134.69
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
11.98
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
8
4
0
7
Vo
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
4
1
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
20.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
4
1
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
1.78
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
8
4
0
8
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
9.39
St
n
.
1
6
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
105.58 7 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
8
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
0
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
6
3
8
2
C
I
N
T
A
S
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
UN
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
9
5
3
4
St
n
1
7
-
A
L
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
6
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
112.27
St
n
1
7
-
O
P
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
112.27
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
6
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
10.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
9.99
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
46
0
1
9
9
5
5
9
St
n
.
2
0
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
134.69
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
11.98 Total :1,053.77
10
5
7
0
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
0
7
0
C
I
T
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
F
I
N
S
E
R
V
I
N
C
1
1
8
6
1
4
5
8
CO
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
P
W
co
p
i
e
r
l
e
a
s
e
f
o
r
P
W
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
538.36 Total :538.36
10
5
7
0
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
1
9
2
1
5
C
I
T
Y
O
F
L
Y
N
N
W
O
O
D
62
6
5
IN
V
#
6
2
6
5
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
7
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
R&
B
F
O
R
M
A
R
C
H
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
9,602.79
IN
V
#
6
2
7
2
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
7
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
62
7
2
R&
B
F
O
R
A
P
R
I
L
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
9,876.33
IN
V
#
6
2
8
0
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
7
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
62
8
0
R&
B
F
O
R
M
A
Y
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
5,256.67
IN
V
#
6
2
8
8
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
7
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
62
8
8
R&
B
F
O
R
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
4,454.25 8 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
9
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
0
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
01
9
2
1
5
C
I
T
Y
O
F
L
Y
N
N
W
O
O
D
IN
V
#
6
2
9
5
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
7
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
62
9
5
20
0
8
A
N
N
U
A
L
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
14,449.66
IN
V
#
6
3
0
6
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
7
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
63
0
6
AP
R
I
L
,
M
A
Y
,
&
J
U
N
E
(
N
A
R
C
S
G
T
S
A
L
A
R
Y
)
~
10
4
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
1
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
10,150.34
IN
V
#
6
3
0
8
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
5
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
63
0
8
MA
Y
2
0
0
8
/
N
E
X
T
E
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
~
10
4
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
1
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
53.04
IN
V
#
6
3
1
0
-
C
U
S
T
#
4
5
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
63
1
0
JU
N
E
2
0
0
8
/
N
E
X
T
E
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
~
10
4
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
1
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
53.04 Total :53,896.12
10
5
7
0
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
5
1
6
0
C
I
T
Y
O
F
S
E
A
T
T
L
E
10
0
1
1
1
1-
2
1
8
3
5
9
-
2
7
9
8
3
2
22
0
3
N
2
0
5
T
H
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
1
.
6
2
14.03 Total :14.03
10
5
7
0
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
0
4
0
9
5
C
O
A
S
T
W
I
D
E
L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
I
E
S
W
1
9
4
9
5
4
0
CL
E
A
N
I
N
G
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
BR
E
A
K
U
P
C
L
E
A
N
E
R
,
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
264.57
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
23.55
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
W
1
9
5
1
3
1
0
PA
P
E
R
T
O
W
E
L
S
,
T
O
I
L
E
T
T
I
S
S
U
E
,
E
T
C
.
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
479.04
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
42.63 Total :809.79
10
5
7
1
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
4
0
9
5
C
O
A
S
T
W
I
D
E
L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
I
E
S
W
1
9
4
8
7
5
1
FA
C
M
A
I
N
T
-
S
A
N
I
T
I
Z
E
R
S
,
T
T
,
K
I
T
R
L
9 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
37
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
10
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
1
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
4
0
9
5
C
O
A
S
T
W
I
D
E
L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
I
E
S
FA
C
M
A
I
N
T
-
S
A
N
I
T
I
Z
E
R
S
,
T
T
,
K
I
T
R
L
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
796.87
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
70.92
FA
C
-
N
O
T
O
U
C
H
T
O
W
E
L
S
W
1
9
5
1
1
7
2
FA
C
-
N
O
T
O
U
C
H
T
O
W
E
L
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
292.32
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
26.02 Total :1,186.13
10
5
7
1
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
0
3
0
0
C
O
D
E
4
I
N
C
56
2
0
IN
V
#
5
6
2
0
/
K
I
N
N
E
Y
,
M
C
I
N
T
Y
R
E
,
M
I
L
L
E
R
,
S
M
I
T
H
RE
G
/
K
I
N
N
E
Y
,
M
C
I
N
T
Y
R
E
,
M
I
L
L
E
R
,
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
376.00 Total :376.00
10
5
7
1
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
8
9
2
C
O
L
U
M
B
I
A
F
O
R
D
I
N
C
3-
8
2
4
5
9
UN
I
T
E
Q
0
5
P
O
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
S
U
N
I
T
2
3
6
-
N
E
W
UN
I
T
E
Q
0
5
P
O
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
S
U
N
I
T
2
3
6
-
N
E
W
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
23,869.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
1,909.52
UN
I
T
E
Q
0
4
P
O
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
S
U
N
I
T
2
3
9
-
N
E
W
3-
8
2
4
6
0
UN
I
T
E
Q
0
4
P
O
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
S
U
N
I
T
2
3
9
-
N
E
W
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
23,869.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
1,909.52
UN
I
T
E
Q
0
7
P
O
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
S
U
N
I
T
2
3
7
-
N
E
W
3-
8
2
4
6
1
UN
I
T
E
Q
0
7
P
O
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
S
U
N
I
T
2
3
7
-
N
E
W
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
23,869.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
1,909.52 Total :77,335.56
10
5
7
1
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
0
6
3
0
0
8
EX
P
R
E
S
S
M
A
I
L
I
N
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
R
E
F
U
N
D
F
O
R
M
S
10 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
38
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
11
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
1
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
EX
P
R
E
S
S
M
A
I
L
I
N
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
R
E
F
U
N
D
F
O
R
M
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
12.60 Total :12.60
10
5
7
1
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
4
9
0
6
3
7
1
8
St
r
e
e
t
/
S
W
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
W
o
r
k
e
r
,
#
0
8
-
3
2
a
d
St
r
e
e
t
/
S
W
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
W
o
r
k
e
r
,
#
0
8
-
3
2
a
d
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
4
0
.
0
0
25.00
St
r
e
e
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
M
a
i
n
t
.
L
a
b
o
r
e
r
,
#
0
8
-
3
7
a
d
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
4
0
.
0
0
25.00
W
a
t
e
r
/
S
e
w
e
r
M
a
i
n
t
.
L
a
b
o
r
e
r
,
#
0
8
-
3
8
a
d
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
4
0
.
0
0
25.00
He
l
p
d
e
s
k
I
n
t
e
r
,
#
0
8
-
3
9
a
d
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
4
0
.
0
0
25.00 Total :100.00
10
5
7
1
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
2
2
7
6
AC
C
T
#
2
2
7
6
-
G
A
N
N
O
N
CA
M
E
R
A
R
E
P
A
I
R
S
H
I
P
P
I
N
G
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
135.64
AC
C
T
#
3
2
6
3
-
O
'
B
R
I
E
N
32
6
3
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
/
B
A
T
T
E
R
I
E
S
,
C
U
P
S
,
K
L
E
E
N
E
X
,
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
609.44
PA
T
R
O
L
S
W
A
T
V
E
S
T
,
S
T
R
O
B
E
L
I
G
H
T
,
A
N
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2,365.19
AC
C
T
#
4
6
8
5
-
C
O
M
P
A
A
N
46
8
5
DA
R
E
E
S
S
A
Y
W
I
N
N
E
R
S
/
L
U
N
C
H
E
O
N
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
3
1
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
132.93
SH
U
T
T
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
/
C
O
M
P
A
A
N
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
3
0
.
0
0
28.28
LO
D
G
I
N
G
/
A
.
C
O
M
P
A
A
N
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
3
0
.
0
0
148.20
AC
C
T
#
8
2
7
2
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
82
7
2
FE
D
E
X
T
O
T
O
Y
O
T
A
M
O
T
O
R
S
A
L
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
18.05
KE
Y
S
M
A
D
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
12.25 11 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
12
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
1
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
AC
C
T
#
8
2
9
8
-
B
A
R
D
82
9
8
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
G
R
E
E
N
M
U
N
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
129.00
ST
O
R
A
G
E
B
O
X
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
65.38
ST
O
R
A
G
E
T
O
O
L
B
O
X
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
65.38
KN
E
E
P
A
D
S
/
S
H
O
O
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
78.30
AC
C
T
#
9
8
2
1
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
98
2
1
OR
A
L
B
O
A
R
D
/
L
U
N
C
H
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
59.19
FE
R
R
Y
C
O
S
T
S
/
L
.
M
A
N
D
E
V
I
L
L
E
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
3
0
.
0
0
28.90
FU
E
L
/
P
O
L
I
C
E
V
E
H
I
C
L
E
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
3
0
.
0
0
44.75 Total :3,920.88
10
5
7
1
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
3
5
2
7
DO
R
S
E
A
I
R
P
R
O
D
-
P
S
-
M
O
T
O
R
DO
R
S
E
A
I
R
P
R
O
D
-
P
S
-
M
O
T
O
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
149.68
DO
R
S
E
A
I
R
P
R
O
D
-
P
S
-
M
O
T
O
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
129.60
RE
L
I
A
B
L
E
P
A
R
T
S
-
F
S
1
6
-
I
N
S
T
A
N
T
A
N
E
O
U
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
59.55
AO
P
T
E
C
H
-
P
W
-
R
E
P
A
I
R
K
I
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
49.57
OF
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
-
W
A
T
E
R
D
E
P
T
-
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
59
8
8
OF
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
-
W
A
T
E
R
D
E
P
T
-
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
164.53
GU
A
R
D
I
A
N
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
-
O
L
D
P
W
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
55.00
NA
T
I
O
N
A
L
N
O
T
A
R
Y
-
R
E
F
U
N
D
M
I
N
U
S
S
H
I
P
P
I
N
G
59
8
8
NA
T
I
O
N
A
L
N
O
T
A
R
Y
-
R
E
F
U
N
D
M
I
N
U
S
S
H
I
P
P
I
N
G
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
-136.73 12 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
40
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
13
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
1
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
9
9
8
3
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
C
A
R
D
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
UN
I
T
9
9
-
M
A
G
I
C
T
O
Y
O
T
A
-
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
E
M
B
L
E
M
75
7
7
UN
I
T
9
9
-
M
A
G
I
C
T
O
Y
O
T
A
-
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
E
M
B
L
E
M
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
23.41
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.30
SH
O
P
-
M
A
S
C
O
T
T
E
Q
U
I
P
-
F
U
E
L
T
A
N
K
C
A
P
S
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
1
.
0
0
60.29
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
F
I
S
H
E
R
I
E
S
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
-
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
26.92
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
R
A
D
I
O
S
H
A
C
K
-
L
E
D
'
S
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
15.19
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
T
-
A
D
A
P
T
E
R
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
10.08
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
T
-
A
D
A
P
T
E
R
S
,
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
11.35
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
A
U
R
O
R
A
P
L
U
M
B
I
N
G
-
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
20.66
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
R
A
D
I
O
S
H
A
C
K
-
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
O
R
S
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
6.82
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
F
I
S
H
E
R
I
E
S
S
U
P
P
L
Y
-
P
L
U
G
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
14.99
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
L
O
W
E
S
-
P
I
P
E
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
10.87
UN
I
T
M
-
1
6
-
I
S
L
A
N
D
M
A
R
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
-
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
80.39
UN
I
T
E
Q
4
6
P
O
-
R
A
D
I
O
S
H
A
C
K
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
8.70
UN
I
T
E
Q
4
6
P
O
-
F
I
S
H
E
R
I
E
S
S
U
P
P
L
Y
-
H
E
A
T
E
R
51
1
.
1
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
9
4
.
4
8
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
141.43
UN
I
T
3
0
4
-
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
T
-
S
T
E
E
L
B
O
X
,
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
21.84
UN
I
T
3
0
4
-
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
T
-
H
A
N
G
E
R
S
T
R
A
P
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
12.98 Total :953.42 13 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
41
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
14
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
1
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
1
5
7
C
O
O
K
,
C
Y
N
D
I
CO
O
K
9
8
2
5
HU
L
A
C
L
A
S
S
E
S
AD
U
L
T
H
U
L
A
#
9
8
2
5
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
1,078.00 Total :1,078.00
10
5
7
1
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
6
4
C
O
O
P
E
R
,
K
E
N
N
E
T
H
C
O
O
P
E
R
0
7
0
2
RE
F
U
N
D
RE
F
U
N
D
D
U
E
T
O
I
N
S
U
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
T
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
41.00 Total :41.00
10
5
7
1
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
8
1
5
C
O
R
R
E
C
T
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
98
4
1
CU
T
T
E
R
W
H
E
E
L
CU
T
T
E
R
W
H
E
E
L
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
161.20
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
14.51 Total :175.71
10
5
7
2
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
8
1
5
C
O
R
R
E
C
T
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
98
2
3
SE
W
E
R
-
E
-
1
P
A
R
T
S
SE
W
E
R
-
E
-
1
P
A
R
T
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
501.81
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
45.16 Total :546.97
10
5
7
2
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
5
6
8
3
C
O
R
R
Y
'
S
F
I
N
E
D
R
Y
C
L
E
A
N
I
N
G
5
1
0
-
0
1
2
8
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
He
p
l
e
r
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
2.94
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
51
0
-
0
4
1
8
Ba
t
t
C
h
i
e
f
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
70.63
PR
E
V
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
51
0
-
1
5
2
4
Fi
r
e
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
3
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
32.39
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
51
0
-
1
5
3
9
BC
W
h
i
t
e
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
17.66 14 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
42
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
15
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
2
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
5
6
8
3
C
O
R
R
Y
'
S
F
I
N
E
D
R
Y
C
L
E
A
N
I
N
G
AD
M
I
N
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
51
0
-
1
8
8
4
FC
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
1
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
26.49
OP
S
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
51
0
-
2
3
4
1
AC
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
4
0
.
0
0
26.48 Total :176.59
10
5
7
2
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
1
6
1
C
O
S
C
O
F
I
R
E
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
I
N
C
1
0
0
0
0
5
9
9
8
9
FA
C
-
A
L
A
R
M
T
R
O
U
B
L
E
S
H
O
O
T
I
N
G
F
E
E
S
FA
C
-
A
L
A
R
M
T
R
O
U
B
L
E
S
H
O
O
T
I
N
G
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
280.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
24.92 Total :304.92
10
5
7
2
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
2
2
5
C
O
S
T
C
O
M
E
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
77
4
0
5
0
1
1
8
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
M
I
S
C
Me
m
b
r
s
h
i
p
r
e
n
e
w
a
l
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
50.00 Total :50.00
10
5
7
2
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
8
4
8
C
R
A
M
,
K
A
T
H
E
R
I
N
E
CR
A
M
9
4
0
2
IR
I
S
H
D
A
N
C
E
C
L
A
S
S
E
S
IR
I
S
H
D
A
N
C
E
F
O
R
K
I
D
S
#
9
4
0
2
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
23.80
IR
I
S
H
D
A
N
C
E
1
3
+
#
9
4
0
6
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
84.00
IR
I
S
H
D
A
N
C
E
F
O
R
K
I
D
S
#
9
4
1
0
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
71.40
IR
I
S
H
D
A
N
C
E
F
O
R
K
I
D
S
#
9
4
1
2
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
168.00 Total :347.20
10
5
7
2
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
5
9
6
5
C
U
E
S
I
N
C
29
0
5
2
3
SE
W
E
R
T
R
U
C
K
C
A
M
E
R
A
R
E
T
U
R
N
S
H
I
P
P
I
N
G
F
E
E
S
15 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
43
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
16
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
2
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
5
9
6
5
C
U
E
S
I
N
C
SE
W
E
R
T
R
U
C
K
C
A
M
E
R
A
R
E
T
U
R
N
S
H
I
P
P
I
N
G
F
E
E
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
184.04
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.38 Total :200.42
10
5
7
2
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
1
9
0
D
A
T
E
C
I
N
C
26
7
6
2
IN
V
#
2
6
7
6
2
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
O
L
I
C
E
PA
N
A
S
O
N
I
C
L
A
P
T
O
P
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
3,670.00
1/
Y
E
A
R
E
X
T
E
N
D
E
D
W
A
R
R
A
N
T
Y
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
280.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
3
5
0
.
0
0
355.50 Total :4,305.50
10
5
7
2
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
2
D
E
A
D
W
O
O
D
R
E
V
I
V
A
L
D
E
A
D
W
O
O
D
0
7
2
7
PA
R
K
C
O
N
C
E
R
T
PA
R
K
C
O
N
C
E
R
T
11
7
.
1
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
3
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
150.00
PA
R
K
C
O
N
C
E
R
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
350.00 Total :500.00
10
5
7
2
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
4
5
3
1
D
I
N
E
S
,
J
E
A
N
N
I
E
08
-
2
8
9
8
MI
N
U
T
E
T
A
K
I
N
G
7/
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
5
1
4
.
3
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
516.00 Total :516.00
10
5
7
2
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
2
9
2
E
D
G
E
A
N
A
L
Y
T
I
C
A
L
08
-
0
7
7
7
4
W
A
T
E
R
Q
U
A
L
I
T
Y
L
A
B
S
A
M
P
L
E
S
W
A
T
E
R
Q
U
A
L
I
T
Y
L
A
B
S
A
M
P
L
E
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
1,768.00 Total :1,768.00
10
5
7
3
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
7
6
7
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
A
U
T
O
P
A
R
T
S
96
8
5
5
20
0
0
16 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
44
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
17
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
3
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
7
6
7
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
A
U
T
O
P
A
R
T
S
BA
T
T
E
R
Y
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
2
107.88
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
2
9.60
20
0
0
97
1
9
2
BA
T
T
E
R
Y
C
O
R
E
C
R
E
D
I
T
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
2
-10.89 Total :106.59
10
5
7
3
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
0
6
8
3
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
M
A
I
L
&
P
A
R
C
E
L
14
7
1
5
UP
S
/
A
S
H
L
A
N
D
/
M
A
N
N
I
N
G
E
N
G
R
.
UP
S
/
A
S
H
L
A
N
D
/
M
A
N
N
I
N
G
E
N
G
R
.
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
42.04
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
3.74
UP
S
/
M
A
N
N
I
N
G
E
N
G
R
.
14
7
1
6
UP
S
/
M
A
N
N
I
N
G
E
N
G
R
.
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
94.28
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
8.39 Total :148.45
10
5
7
3
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
5
2
3
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
&
R
Y
O
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
H
U
G
H
0
7
1
0
YO
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
S
YO
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
:
~
12
2
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
75.00
YO
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
:
J
O
S
H
L
A
M
U
S
G
A
12
2
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
150.00
YO
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
S
NO
R
W
O
O
D
0
6
2
6
YO
U
T
H
S
C
H
O
L
A
R
S
H
I
P
:
~
12
2
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
132.00 Total :357.00
10
5
7
3
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
9
8
7
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
O
L
I
C
E
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
0
8
-
1
0
4
IN
V
#
0
8
-
1
0
4
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
O
L
I
C
E
D
E
P
T
.
ED
M
O
N
D
S
N
I
G
H
T
O
U
T
/
B
U
D
G
E
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
3
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
2,000.00 Total :2,000.00 17 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
18
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
3
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
8
7
0
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
3-
3
8
5
6
5
W
A
T
E
R
18
4
1
0
9
2
N
D
A
V
E
W
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
21.25
CI
T
Y
M
A
R
I
N
A
B
E
A
C
H
P
A
R
K
6-
0
0
0
2
5
CI
T
Y
M
A
R
I
N
A
B
E
A
C
H
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
247.75
CI
T
Y
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
D
O
C
K
&
R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M
6-
0
0
2
0
0
CI
T
Y
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
D
O
C
K
&
R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
503.32
BR
A
C
K
E
T
T
'
S
L
A
N
D
I
N
G
S
O
U
T
H
6-
0
0
4
1
0
BR
A
C
K
E
T
T
'
S
L
A
N
D
I
N
G
S
O
U
T
H
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
225.54
MI
N
I
P
A
R
K
6-
0
0
4
7
5
MI
N
I
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
600.39
CI
T
Y
P
A
R
K
B
A
L
L
F
I
E
L
D
6-
0
1
2
5
0
CI
T
Y
P
A
R
K
B
A
L
L
F
I
E
L
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
260.56
CI
T
Y
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
6-
0
1
2
7
5
CI
T
Y
P
A
R
K
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
808.25
PI
N
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
L
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
6-
0
2
1
2
5
PI
N
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
L
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
184.07
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
U
L
T
U
R
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
(
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
)
6-
0
2
9
0
0
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
U
L
T
U
R
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
(
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
)
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
670.78
CI
V
I
C
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
6-
0
3
0
0
0
CI
V
I
C
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
237.49
HU
M
M
I
N
G
B
I
R
D
H
I
L
L
P
A
R
K
6-
0
3
2
7
5
HU
M
M
I
N
G
B
I
R
D
H
I
L
L
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
80.02
CI
T
Y
M
A
P
L
E
W
O
O
D
P
A
R
K
6-
0
3
5
7
5
CI
T
Y
M
A
P
L
E
W
O
O
D
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
148.82 18 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
19
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
3
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
8
7
0
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
SE
A
V
I
E
W
P
A
R
K
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
6-
0
4
4
0
0
SE
A
V
I
E
W
P
A
R
K
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
320.72
W
A
T
E
R
6-
0
4
4
2
5
81
0
0
1
8
5
T
H
P
L
S
W
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
276.97
SI
E
R
R
A
P
A
R
K
6-
0
4
4
5
0
SI
E
R
R
A
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
315.49
BA
L
L
I
N
G
E
R
P
A
R
K
6-
0
7
7
7
5
BA
L
L
I
N
G
E
R
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
155.81
YO
S
T
P
A
R
K
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
6-
0
8
5
0
0
YO
S
T
P
A
R
K
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
606.71
YO
S
T
P
A
R
K
P
O
O
L
6-
0
8
5
2
5
YO
S
T
P
A
R
K
P
O
O
L
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
1,864.83 Total :7,528.77
10
5
7
3
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
0
8
7
0
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
6-
0
1
1
2
7
W
W
T
P
W
A
T
E
R
W
W
T
P
W
A
T
E
R
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
3
.
6
4
105.54
W
W
T
P
W
A
T
E
R
6-
0
1
1
3
0
W
W
T
P
W
A
T
E
R
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
3
.
6
4
22.89
W
W
T
P
W
A
T
E
R
6-
0
1
1
4
0
W
W
T
P
W
A
T
E
R
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
3
.
6
4
840.35 Total :968.78
10
5
7
3
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
00
8
7
0
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
6-
0
2
7
3
5
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
-
P
O
L
I
C
E
/
C
R
T
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
-
P
O
L
I
C
E
/
C
R
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
1,023.37 19 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
20
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
3
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
8
7
0
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
-
F
I
R
E
L
I
N
E
6-
0
2
7
3
6
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
-
F
I
R
E
L
I
N
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
13.08
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
-
F
I
R
E
6-
0
2
7
3
7
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
-
F
I
R
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
165.06
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
6-
0
2
7
3
8
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
I
R
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
236.86
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
&
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
6-
0
2
8
2
5
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
&
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
2,048.50
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
U
L
T
U
R
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
(
F
I
R
6-
0
2
8
7
5
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
U
L
T
U
R
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
(
F
I
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
22.89
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
U
L
T
U
R
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
6-
0
2
9
2
5
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
C
U
L
T
U
R
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
1,271.14
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
6-
0
4
1
2
7
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
459.98
fi
r
e
s
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
-
F
S
#
1
6
6-
0
4
1
2
8
fi
r
e
s
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
-
F
S
#
1
6
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
13.08 20 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
21
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
3
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
00
8
7
0
5
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
6-
0
5
1
5
5
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
92.91
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
353.07
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
353.07
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
353.07
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
353.07
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
B
l
d
g
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
353.06
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
6-
0
5
1
5
6
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
1.63
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
6.21
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
6.21
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
6.21
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
6.21
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
F
i
r
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
6.19 Total :7,144.87
10
5
7
3
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
2
2
0
E
D
W
A
R
D
S
,
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
E
ED
W
A
R
D
S
9
4
9
9
SP
A
N
I
S
H
C
L
A
S
S
E
S
BE
G
I
N
N
I
N
G
S
P
A
N
I
S
H
F
O
R
K
I
D
S
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
184.80 Total :184.80
10
5
7
3
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
9
2
4
E
I
M
C
O
W
A
T
E
R
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
I
E
S
8
4
4
8
7
9
0
18
5
1
8
5
5
1
0
4
21 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
22
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
3
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
9
9
2
4
E
I
M
C
O
W
A
T
E
R
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
I
E
S
W
I
P
E
R
/
S
I
D
E
/
B
O
T
T
O
M
N
E
O
P
R
E
N
E
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
924.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
85.46
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
86.59 Total :1,096.05
10
5
7
3
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
0
8
8
1
2
E
L
E
C
T
R
O
N
I
C
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
M
A
C
H
I
N
E
S
0
3
5
7
1
5
CO
P
I
E
R
M
A
I
N
T
CO
P
I
E
R
M
A
I
N
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
34.00 Total :34.00
10
5
7
4
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
1
8
5
9
E
V
I
S
T
O
N
,
S
U
Z
A
N
N
E
P
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
JU
N
E
2
0
0
8
B
O
A
R
D
I
N
G
O
F
P
O
L
I
C
E
K
9
R
O
C
K
Y
~
BO
A
R
D
I
N
G
O
F
P
O
L
I
C
E
K
9
R
O
C
K
Y
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
6
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
174.00 Total :174.00
10
5
7
4
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
3
7
8
F
A
S
T
E
N
A
L
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
W
A
M
O
U
1
3
5
6
9
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
EA
R
P
L
U
G
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
27.30
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.43 Total :29.73
10
5
7
4
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
3
7
8
F
A
S
T
E
N
A
L
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
W
A
M
O
U
1
3
4
3
8
W
A
T
E
R
-
H
O
L
E
S
A
W
W
A
T
E
R
-
H
O
L
E
S
A
W
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
48.87
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
4.35 Total :53.22
10
5
7
4
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
3
8
0
F
B
I
N
A
A
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
G
.
G
A
N
N
O
N
RE
G
/
G
.
G
A
N
N
O
N
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
G
.
G
A
N
N
O
N
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
150.00 22 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
23
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :150.00
10
5
7
4
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
3
8
0
0
6
9
3
8
0
F
B
I
N
A
A
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
10
5
7
4
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
7
0
4
2
F
I
N
A
L
T
O
U
C
H
F
I
N
I
S
H
I
N
G
KI
N
G
9
5
0
5
ET
I
Q
U
E
T
T
E
C
L
A
S
S
E
S
YO
U
N
G
L
A
D
I
E
S
&
G
E
N
T
L
E
M
E
N
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
275.00 Total :275.00
10
5
7
4
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
7
4
6
F
I
R
E
H
O
U
S
E
M
A
G
A
Z
I
N
E
18
8
4
AD
M
I
N
M
I
S
C
su
b
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
r
e
n
e
w
a
l
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
1
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
29.95 Total :29.95
10
5
7
4
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
3
6
F
L
E
T
C
PO
8
1
4
4
0
0
0
2
8
BI
L
L
#
P
0
8
1
4
4
0
0
0
2
8
-
H
O
N
N
E
N
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
D
.
H
O
N
N
E
N
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
707.11 Total :707.11
10
5
7
4
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
0
8
5
5
F
L
E
X
P
L
A
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
I
N
C
14
1
8
20
0
7
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
u
e
f
r
o
m
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
5
20
0
7
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
u
e
f
r
o
m
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
5
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
0.05
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
5
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
2
0
0
7
-
f
o
r
7/
9
/
0
8
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
5
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
2
0
0
7
-
f
o
r
81
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
1
.
5
9
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
167.53
20
0
7
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
5
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
C
u
r
t
7/
9
/
0
8
20
0
7
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
2
5
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
-
C
u
r
t
81
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
1
.
5
9
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
5.87 Total :173.45
10
5
7
4
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
1
2
7
5
G
A
N
G
P
R
E
V
E
N
T
I
O
N
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
P
O
F
F
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
M
.
P
O
F
F
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
M
.
P
O
F
F
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
200.00 Total :200.00
10
5
7
4
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
2
1
9
9
G
R
A
I
N
G
E
R
96
7
6
9
0
0
1
4
6
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
23 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
51
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
24
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
4
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
01
2
1
9
9
G
R
A
I
N
G
E
R
W
I
R
E
R
O
P
E
/
C
A
B
L
E
C
U
T
T
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
76.85
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
6.85
BA
T
T
E
R
Y
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
96
8
3
2
1
3
1
1
1
BA
T
T
E
R
Y
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
36.45
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
3.25 Total :123.40
10
5
7
5
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
2
1
9
9
G
R
A
I
N
G
E
R
96
7
3
8
9
0
4
9
8
YO
S
T
P
A
R
K
-
L
I
N
E
V
T
-
S
T
A
T
YO
S
T
P
A
R
K
-
L
I
N
E
V
T
-
S
T
A
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
14.99
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
1.28
FA
C
M
A
I
N
T
-
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
M
E
T
E
R
96
7
9
9
5
5
5
5
0
FA
C
M
A
I
N
T
-
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
M
E
T
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
128.12
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
11.02 Total :155.41
10
5
7
5
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
2
5
6
0
H
A
C
H
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
58
0
5
9
0
3
11
2
8
3
0
OR
P
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
2
96.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
2
15.95
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
2
9.96 Total :121.91
10
5
7
5
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
7
H
A
R
D
W
I
C
K
,
H
E
I
D
I
HA
R
D
W
I
C
K
0
7
1
5
RE
F
U
N
D
CL
A
S
S
R
E
F
U
N
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
30.00 24 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
52
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
25
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :30.00
10
5
7
5
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
5
7
0
7
2
3
5
7
H
A
R
D
W
I
C
K
,
H
E
I
D
I
10
5
7
5
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
3
3
2
H
E
A
L
T
H
F
O
R
C
E
O
C
C
M
E
D
1
0
3
0
-
1
0
0
Dr
u
g
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
-
5
/
2
9
/
0
8
Dr
u
g
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
-
5
/
2
9
/
0
8
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
85.00 Total :85.00
10
5
7
5
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
8
H
E
R
R
,
K
A
R
E
N
HE
R
R
0
7
2
2
RE
F
U
N
D
RE
F
U
N
D
/
T
R
A
N
S
F
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
14.00 Total :14.00
10
5
7
5
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
0
0
4
2
I
K
O
N
F
I
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
5
0
0
8
6
3
8
6
0
1
IN
V
#
5
0
0
8
6
3
8
6
0
1
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
1
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
921.10
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
1
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
81.98 Total :1,003.08
10
5
7
5
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
0
5
2
6
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
T
A
C
T
I
C
A
L
07
/
0
7
/
2
0
0
8
1/
3
O
F
S
W
A
T
T
R
A
I
N
I
N
G
B
I
L
L
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
5/
D
A
Y
S
W
A
T
S
C
H
O
O
L
/
R
E
G
E
T
C
.
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
4,000.00 Total :4,000.00
10
5
7
5
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
6
5
J
I
J
O
N
,
T
R
I
N
I
D
A
D
JI
J
O
N
0
7
0
9
RE
F
U
N
D
RE
F
U
N
D
O
F
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
200.00 Total :200.00
10
5
7
5
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
5
3
8
1
J
O
H
N
E
R
E
I
D
&
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
I
N
C
9
5
5
9
3
IN
V
#
9
5
5
9
3
-
F
R
A
U
S
T
O
,
L
A
V
E
L
Y
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
RE
G
/
F
R
A
U
S
T
O
A
N
D
L
A
V
E
L
Y
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
820.00 Total :820.00
10
5
7
5
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
7
3
7
J
O
H
N
S
O
N
R
O
B
E
R
T
S
&
A
S
S
O
C
1
1
0
2
1
4
IN
V
#
1
1
0
2
1
4
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
25 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
53
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
26
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
5
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
8
7
3
7
J
O
H
N
S
O
N
R
O
B
E
R
T
S
&
A
S
S
O
C
PH
Q
R
E
P
O
R
T
/
P
R
E
-
O
F
F
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
15.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
1.17 Total :16.17
10
5
7
6
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
6
6
K
L
E
P
P
E
R
,
A
N
A
KL
E
P
P
E
R
0
7
0
2
RE
F
U
N
D
CA
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
S
W
I
M
L
E
S
S
O
N
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
34.00 Total :34.00
10
5
7
6
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
9
3
4
3
K
R
A
Z
A
N
&
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
I
N
C
IN
V
0
9
6
8
1
8
9
-
1
4
7
1
8
FA
C
S
E
I
S
M
I
C
R
E
T
R
O
F
I
T
S
V
C
-
J
U
N
E
0
8
FA
C
S
E
I
S
M
I
C
R
E
T
R
O
F
I
T
S
V
C
-
J
U
N
E
0
8
11
6
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
810.00 Total :810.00
10
5
7
6
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
7
0
5
0
K
W
I
C
K
'
N
K
L
E
E
N
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
06
1
2
2
0
0
8
-
0
1
IN
V
#
0
6
1
2
2
0
0
8
-
0
1
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
CA
R
W
A
S
H
E
S
F
O
R
P
O
L
I
C
E
V
E
H
I
C
L
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
138.04 Total :138.04
10
5
7
6
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
0
1
3
2
L
A
B
S
A
F
E
T
Y
S
U
P
P
L
Y
10
1
1
8
2
9
9
8
1
OP
S
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
Lo
t
o
k
i
t
m
a
i
n
t
&
w
r
i
s
t
c
o
i
l
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
331.80
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
12.27 Total :344.07
10
5
7
6
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
7
1
3
5
L
A
N
D
A
U
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
I
N
C
00
2
3
4
1
2
Pr
o
f
S
e
r
v
G
e
o
R
e
v
i
e
w
R
a
y
S
F
R
Pr
o
f
S
e
r
v
G
e
o
R
e
v
i
e
w
R
a
y
S
F
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
2
0
.
5
2
4
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
1,708.33 Total :1,708.33
10
5
7
6
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
8
7
1
1
L
A
W
N
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
S
U
P
P
L
Y
70
0
8
-
1
7
3
MO
W
E
R
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
26 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
54
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
27
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
6
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
8
7
1
1
L
A
W
N
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
S
U
P
P
L
Y
BO
L
T
S
,
C
O
V
E
R
S
,
G
A
S
K
E
T
S
,
E
T
C
.
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
47.94
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.26
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
4.47
MO
W
E
R
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
70
0
8
-
3
0
1
SP
R
I
N
G
A
N
D
C
O
V
E
R
K
N
O
B
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
32.13
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
5.20
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
3.32
MO
W
E
R
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
70
0
8
-
3
0
2
MU
L
C
H
B
L
A
D
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
66.15
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
9.07
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
6.69
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
70
0
8
-
3
2
1
NI
T
R
I
L
E
G
L
O
V
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
31.80
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.26
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
3.03
MO
W
E
R
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
70
0
8
-
3
2
2
HE
D
G
E
T
R
I
M
M
E
R
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
215.99
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
12.57
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
20.34 27 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
55
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
28
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :463.22
10
5
7
6
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
8
7
1
1
0
6
8
7
1
1
L
A
W
N
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
S
U
P
P
L
Y
10
5
7
6
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
0
5
9
L
E
E
,
N
I
C
O
L
E
15
4
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
60.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
16
7
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
1
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
50.00 Total :110.00
10
5
7
6
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
1
8
7
6
0
L
U
N
D
S
O
F
F
I
C
E
E
S
S
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
09
8
5
8
2
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
1
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
216.71 Total :216.71
10
5
7
6
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
8
7
6
0
L
U
N
D
S
O
F
F
I
C
E
E
S
S
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
09
8
7
1
3
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
C
A
R
D
S
F
O
R
D
E
V
.
S
E
R
.
,
P
W
&
H
R
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
C
a
r
d
s
~
25
0
-
0
0
2
0
5
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
2
0
.
5
5
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.00
An
n
B
u
l
l
i
s
25
0
-
0
0
2
0
5
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
2
0
.
5
5
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.00
Li
n
d
a
M
c
M
u
r
p
h
y
25
0
-
0
0
2
0
5
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.00
Da
v
e
S
i
t
t
a
u
e
r
25
0
-
0
0
2
0
5
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.00
Kr
i
s
K
u
h
n
h
a
u
s
e
n
25
0
-
0
0
2
0
5
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
16.00
De
b
i
H
u
m
a
n
n
25
0
-
0
0
2
0
5
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
16.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
2
0
.
5
5
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.85
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.85
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
1.42
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
1
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
1.42 28 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
56
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
29
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :104.54
10
5
7
6
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
1
8
7
6
0
0
1
8
7
6
0
L
U
N
D
S
O
F
F
I
C
E
E
S
S
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
10
5
7
6
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
5
9
L
U
P
T
O
N
,
J
E
A
N
N
I
N
E
LU
P
T
O
N
0
7
2
2
RE
F
U
N
D
RE
F
U
N
D
O
F
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
L
E
S
S
E
X
T
R
A
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
470.00 Total :470.00
10
5
7
7
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
2
5
8
M
A
R
E
N
A
K
O
S
I
N
C
09
0
0
8
1
4
-
I
N
W
I
L
L
O
W
C
R
E
E
K
S
T
R
E
A
M
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
BO
U
L
D
E
R
S
&
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
O
R
W
I
L
L
O
W
C
R
E
E
K
12
5
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
574.92
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
12
5
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
49.44 Total :624.36
10
5
7
7
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
3
6
2
M
A
R
S
H
A
L
L
,
C
I
T
A
13
5
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
140.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
13
6
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
1
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
80.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
13
7
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
175.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
16
2
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
1
50.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
36
9
1
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
9
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
50.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
37
0
7
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
9
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
50.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
37
3
4
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
9
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
50.00 29 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
57
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
30
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
7
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
9
3
6
2
M
A
R
S
H
A
L
L
,
C
I
T
A
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
37
4
6
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
E
R
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
9
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
50.00 Total :645.00
10
5
7
7
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
9
6
5
0
M
A
S
T
E
R
P
O
O
L
S
O
F
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
I
N
C
4
7
9
0
3
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
C
H
E
M
I
C
A
L
S
A
N
D
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
174.90
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
15.57 Total :190.47
10
5
7
7
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
02
0
0
3
6
M
C
I
N
T
O
S
H
,
B
R
I
A
N
MC
I
N
T
O
S
H
0
7
2
1
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
AT
&
T
T
E
R
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
5
1
8
.
8
8
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
175.00 Total :175.00
10
5
7
7
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
02
0
0
3
9
M
C
M
A
S
T
E
R
-
C
A
R
R
S
U
P
P
L
Y
C
O
9
2
8
4
3
1
9
4
12
3
1
0
6
8
0
0
EX
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
P
R
I
N
G
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
16.86
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
5.95
12
3
1
0
6
8
0
0
93
0
7
2
4
9
2
CP
V
C
S
H
E
E
T
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
121.54
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
13.57 Total :157.92
10
5
7
7
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
02
0
9
0
0
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
E
Q
U
I
P
&
R
E
N
T
A
L
L
I
N
C
7
1
1
4
0
PA
S
Y
S
T
E
M
R
E
N
T
A
L
RE
N
T
A
L
O
F
P
A
S
Y
S
T
E
M
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
170.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
15.13 Total :185.13 30 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
31
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
7
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
6
3
M
O
R
A
N
-
F
A
R
N
S
W
O
R
T
H
,
T
A
M
M
Y
M
O
R
A
N
-
0
7
1
0
RE
F
U
N
D
CL
A
S
S
R
E
F
U
N
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
86.00 Total :86.00
10
5
7
7
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
9
9
2
3
M
O
T
I
O
N
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
I
E
S
I
N
C
W
A
0
9
-
0
2
9
5
1
0
10
1
6
9
0
-
0
1
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
C
H
A
I
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
303.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
38.71
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
30.41
10
1
6
9
0
-
0
1
W
A
0
9
-
0
2
9
4
6
0
CO
T
T
E
R
E
D
C
H
A
I
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
351.25
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
52.69
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
2
1
35.95 Total :812.01
10
5
7
7
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
2
4
6
M
U
S
E
U
M
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
C
O
65
9
4
0
DI
S
C
O
V
E
R
Y
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
SE
A
L
I
F
E
P
E
N
C
I
L
S
,
B
U
G
B
O
X
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
3
5
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
48.60
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
3
5
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
10.75 Total :59.35
10
5
7
7
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
7
8
9
1
M
Y
S
T
I
C
S
E
A
C
H
A
R
T
E
R
S
MY
S
T
I
C
S
E
A
1
0
1
9
8
W
H
A
L
E
W
A
T
C
H
I
N
G
C
R
U
I
S
E
MY
S
T
I
C
S
E
A
C
H
A
R
T
E
R
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
392.00 Total :392.00
10
5
7
8
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
6
3
9
1
N
O
R
T
H
S
T
A
R
C
H
E
M
I
C
A
L
I
N
C
00
9
2
5
5
1
SO
D
I
U
M
B
I
S
U
L
F
I
T
E
31 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
32
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
8
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
6
3
9
1
N
O
R
T
H
S
T
A
R
C
H
E
M
I
C
A
L
I
N
C
SO
D
I
U
M
B
I
S
U
L
F
I
T
E
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
5
4
1,445.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
5
4
128.61 Total :1,573.61
10
5
7
8
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
5
0
0
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
1
0
1
2
3
3
IN
V
#
1
0
1
2
3
3
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
CL
E
A
N
I
N
G
/
R
E
P
A
I
R
F
A
X
M
A
C
H
I
N
E
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
1
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
205.50
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
1
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
17.67 Total :223.17
10
5
7
8
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
1
0
1
3
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
A
S
C
A
D
E
I
N
C
07
6
6
7
6
2
HO
N
E
Y
B
U
C
K
E
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
MA
R
I
N
A
B
E
A
C
H
P
A
R
K
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
411.37
HO
N
E
Y
B
U
C
K
E
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
07
6
9
0
1
4
CI
V
I
C
C
E
N
T
E
R
P
L
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
180.29
HO
N
E
Y
B
U
C
K
E
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
07
7
0
2
0
0
HO
N
E
Y
B
U
C
K
E
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
:
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
92.20
HO
N
E
Y
B
U
C
K
E
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
07
7
0
2
0
1
HO
N
E
Y
B
U
C
K
E
T
R
E
N
T
A
L
:
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
98.02 Total :781.88
10
5
7
8
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
1
1
6
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
6
FA
C
S
E
I
S
M
I
C
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
R
E
T
R
O
F
I
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
FA
C
S
E
I
S
M
I
C
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
R
E
T
R
O
F
I
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
11
6
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
9
4
.
1
9
0
.
6
5
0
.
0
0
205,590.04 Total :205,590.04
10
5
7
8
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
50
6
9
0
7
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
1
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
345.92 32 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
33
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
8
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
56
5
2
7
3
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
1
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
66.29
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
64
2
9
1
2
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
496.88 Total :909.09
10
5
7
8
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
27
6
3
2
6
OF
F
I
C
E
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
LE
A
F
L
E
T
H
O
L
D
E
R
11
7
.
1
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
3
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
5.37
PA
P
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
17.16
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
11
7
.
1
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
3
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
0.48
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
1.54
OF
F
I
C
E
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
48
4
9
6
4
ST
A
P
L
E
R
,
L
E
A
D
R
E
F
I
L
L
S
11
7
.
1
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
3
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
29.88
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
11
7
.
1
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
3
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.69 Total :57.12
10
5
7
8
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
57
6
8
2
4
IN
V
#
5
7
6
8
2
4
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
33 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
61
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
34
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
8
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
TO
N
E
R
,
F
I
L
E
S
,
E
T
C
.
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
171.29
TO
N
E
R
/
D
E
T
E
C
T
I
V
E
U
N
I
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
1
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
377.58
FO
L
D
E
R
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
7
1
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
61.18
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
1
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
15.42
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
1
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
33.98
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
7
1
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
5.50 Total :664.95
10
5
7
8
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
70
2
8
5
2
OF
F
I
C
E
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
Of
f
i
c
e
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
5
1
4
.
3
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
136.80
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
5
1
4
.
3
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
12.31 Total :149.11
10
5
7
8
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
3
5
1
1
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
A
X
I
N
C
62
7
3
0
6
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
St
a
t
i
o
n
s
'
c
o
p
y
p
a
p
e
r
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
23.70
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
2.13
OP
S
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
66
5
3
1
2
St
a
t
i
o
n
s
'
c
o
p
y
p
a
p
e
r
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
237.00
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
21.34 Total :284.17
10
5
7
8
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
02
5
8
8
9
O
G
D
E
N
M
U
R
P
H
Y
A
N
D
W
A
L
L
A
C
E
6
6
7
8
5
6
JU
N
E
-
0
8
R
E
T
A
I
N
E
R
F
E
E
S
34 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
62
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
35
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
8
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
02
5
8
8
9
O
G
D
E
N
M
U
R
P
H
Y
A
N
D
W
A
L
L
A
C
E
Ju
n
e
-
0
8
R
e
t
a
i
n
e
r
F
e
e
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
6
0
.
5
1
5
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
15,120.94
JU
N
E
-
0
8
L
E
G
A
L
F
E
E
S
66
7
8
8
3
Ju
n
e
-
0
8
L
e
g
a
l
F
e
e
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
6
0
.
5
1
5
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
24,599.32 Total :39,720.26
10
5
7
9
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
2
5
8
8
9
O
G
D
E
N
M
U
R
P
H
Y
A
N
D
W
A
L
L
A
C
E
6
6
7
8
5
6
Le
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
L
e
g
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
J
u
n
e
,
2
0
0
8
Le
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
L
e
g
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
J
u
n
e
,
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
1
1
0
.
5
1
1
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
4,369.80 Total :4,369.80
10
5
7
9
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
5
7
0
4
O
M
B
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
OM
B
0
7
2
1
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
SU
M
M
E
R
C
O
N
C
E
R
T
C
O
O
R
D
I
N
A
T
O
R
11
7
.
1
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
3
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
975.00 Total :975.00
10
5
7
9
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
3
7
5
0
O
R
C
A
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
I
N
C
03
4
5
5
6
PO
O
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
C
H
E
M
I
C
A
L
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
119.84
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
10.67
PO
O
L
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
03
4
7
2
1
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
C
H
E
M
I
C
A
L
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
300.73
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
26.76 Total :458.00
10
5
7
9
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
1
4
0
2
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
N
W
F
L
O
A
T
T
R
I
P
S
PA
C
N
W
F
L
O
A
T
9
4
3
8
FL
O
A
T
T
R
I
P
W
I
N
E
T
A
S
T
I
N
G
F
L
O
A
T
T
R
I
P
#
9
4
3
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
664.85 Total :664.85
10
5
7
9
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
2
7
0
6
0
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
T
O
P
S
O
I
L
S
31
4
4
4
6
BR
U
S
H
D
U
M
P
35 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
63
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
36
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
9
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
02
7
0
6
0
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
T
O
P
S
O
I
L
S
BR
U
S
H
D
U
M
P
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
225.00
BR
U
S
H
D
U
M
P
69
9
8
8
BR
U
S
H
D
U
M
P
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
160.00 Total :385.00
10
5
7
9
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
6
4
1
2
P
A
R
K
S
&
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
D
A
Y
C
A
M
P
C
A
M
P
C
A
S
H
0
7
2
2
DA
Y
C
A
M
P
P
E
T
T
Y
C
A
S
H
R
E
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
DA
Y
C
A
M
P
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
3
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
34.50
DA
Y
C
A
M
P
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
3
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
149.05 Total :183.55
10
5
7
9
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
1
1
9
P
E
A
K
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
L
L
C
08
0
7
0
4
-
0
0
5
7
CE
M
E
T
E
R
Y
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
IN
T
E
R
N
E
T
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
F
O
R
C
E
M
E
T
E
R
Y
13
0
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
3
6
.
2
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
17.95 Total :17.95
10
5
7
9
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
4
5
5
2
P
I
T
N
E
Y
B
O
W
E
S
38
3
3
1
0
0
J
Y
0
8
PO
S
T
A
G
E
M
A
C
H
I
N
E
L
E
A
S
E
Le
a
s
e
f
r
o
m
6
/
3
0
t
o
7
/
3
0
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
5
1
4
.
3
0
0
.
4
5
0
.
0
0
866.00 Total :866.00
10
5
7
9
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
1
8
1
1
P
O
N
Y
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
&
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
C
T
R
1
6
8
6
1
5
FL
E
E
T
-
S
I
R
E
N
E
T
-
R
E
T
U
R
N
P
O
S
T
A
G
E
FL
E
E
T
-
S
I
R
E
N
E
T
-
R
E
T
U
R
N
P
O
S
T
A
G
E
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
18.41
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
R
E
T
U
R
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
5.78
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
R
E
T
U
R
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
5.78 36 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
64
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
37
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
7
9
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
07
1
8
1
1
P
O
N
Y
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
&
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
C
T
R
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
16
8
7
9
1
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
5.78
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
5.78
FL
E
E
T
-
M
E
T
R
O
T
E
C
H
R
E
T
U
R
N
P
O
S
T
A
G
E
16
8
9
4
2
FL
E
E
T
-
M
E
T
R
O
T
E
C
H
R
E
T
U
R
N
P
O
S
T
A
G
E
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
18.59
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
16
9
0
3
8
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
4.35
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
O
F
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
4.35
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
R
E
T
U
R
N
16
9
1
0
0
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
R
E
T
U
R
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
4.35
W
A
T
E
R
/
S
E
W
E
R
-
D
E
P
T
L
&
I
V
I
D
E
O
-
R
E
T
U
R
N
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
4.35 Total :77.52
10
5
7
9
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
4
0
8
8
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
N
E
2
9
1
1
0
4
24
H
O
U
R
A
L
A
R
M
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
-
P
A
R
K
S
~
24
H
O
U
R
A
L
A
R
M
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
-
P
A
R
K
S
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
44.93
24
H
O
U
R
A
L
A
R
M
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
-
P
A
R
K
S
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
44.92
Fi
r
e
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
F
/
S
1
6
-
8
/
1
-
1
0
/
3
1
/
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
90.00 Total :179.85
10
5
8
0
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
1
9
1
1
P
R
O
T
Z
,
M
A
R
G
A
R
E
T
PR
O
T
Z
9
6
0
9
FE
L
D
E
N
K
R
A
I
S
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
FE
L
D
E
N
K
R
A
I
S
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
#
9
6
0
9
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
4
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
140.00 Total :140.00
10
5
8
0
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
6
9
7
P
U
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
T
E
S
T
I
N
G
I
N
C
20
0
8
-
2
3
6
1
Ap
r
i
l
-
J
u
n
e
2
0
0
8
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
e
e
s
37 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
65
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
38
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
0
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
8
6
9
7
P
U
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
T
E
S
T
I
N
G
I
N
C
Ap
r
i
l
-
J
u
n
e
2
0
0
8
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
e
e
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
2
0
.
5
1
6
.
2
1
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
700.00 Total :700.00
10
5
8
0
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
04
6
9
0
0
P
U
G
E
T
S
O
U
N
D
E
N
E
R
G
Y
79
1
8
8
0
7
0
0
4
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
5,051.06 Total :5,051.06
10
5
8
0
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
0
8
0
9
P
U
G
E
T
S
O
U
N
D
E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
08
-
3
9
6
CO
U
R
T
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
CO
U
R
T
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
1,891.25 Total :1,891.25
10
5
8
0
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
0
7
8
0
Q
U
I
R
I
N
G
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
S
I
N
C
90
0
0
3
MA
R
K
E
R
MA
R
K
E
R
:
F
O
S
M
A
R
K
13
0
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
3
6
.
2
0
0
.
3
4
0
.
0
0
546.00
IN
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
90
2
0
3
IN
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
:
E
A
R
N
H
E
A
R
T
13
0
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
3
6
.
2
0
0
.
3
4
0
.
0
0
78.00 Total :624.00
10
5
8
0
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
1
0
6
0
R
A
D
I
X
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
00
3
0
3
4
RA
D
I
X
M
O
N
T
H
L
Y
M
A
I
N
T
A
U
G
0
8
RA
D
I
X
M
O
N
T
H
L
Y
M
A
I
N
T
A
U
G
0
8
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
112.35 Total :112.35
10
5
8
0
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
1
6
9
6
R
A
N
K
I
N
S
,
K
A
T
E
KR
A
N
K
I
N
S
0
7
1
9
PL
A
Z
A
R
O
O
M
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
PL
A
Z
A
R
O
O
M
A
N
D
D
A
N
C
E
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
1
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
255.00 Total :255.00
10
5
8
0
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
6
9
4
8
R
A
Y
A
L
L
E
N
M
F
G
C
O
I
N
C
23
4
5
5
9
IN
V
#
2
3
4
5
5
9
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
38 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
66
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
39
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
0
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
6
9
4
8
R
A
Y
A
L
L
E
N
M
F
G
C
O
I
N
C
K9
K
I
M
O
N
O
L
I
T
E
T
R
A
I
N
I
N
G
S
U
I
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
6
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
995.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
6
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
30.00 Total :1,025.00
10
5
8
0
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
6
0
R
Y
A
N
,
C
H
A
R
L
E
N
E
R
Y
A
N
0
7
1
5
RE
F
U
N
D
RE
F
U
N
D
A
B
L
E
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
500.00 Total :500.00
10
5
8
0
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
1
4
8
2
S
E
A
-
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
I
N
C
12
6
2
8
3
OP
S
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
V
E
C
L
O
T
H
I
N
G
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
c
l
o
t
h
i
n
g
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
0
0
362.92
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
0
0
32.30 Total :395.22
10
5
8
1
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
6
0
7
0
S
H
A
N
N
O
N
T
O
W
I
N
G
I
N
C
19
1
5
1
0
IN
V
#
1
9
1
5
1
0
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
TO
W
I
N
G
/
F
O
R
D
C
R
O
W
N
V
I
C
/
B
L
U
E
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
136.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
2
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
12.10 Total :148.10
10
5
8
1
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
6
5
0
9
S
I
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
F
O
R
M
S
I
N
C
10
8
1
6
0
5
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
1
2
.
5
0
1
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
1,069.19 Total :1,069.19
10
5
8
1
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
7
6
4
4
S
I
G
N
O
N
5
3
1
3
SI
G
N
L
A
N
G
U
A
G
E
I
N
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
I
N
G
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
I
N
G
F
O
R
Y
O
S
T
P
O
O
L
S
T
U
D
E
N
T
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
620.00
IN
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
I
N
G
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
2
0
0
.
4
3
0
.
0
0
81.92 39 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
67
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
40
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :701.92
10
5
8
1
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
7
6
4
4
0
6
7
6
4
4
S
I
G
N
O
N
10
5
8
1
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
3
6
9
5
5
S
K
Y
N
U
R
S
E
R
Y
27
1
2
6
2
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
PL
A
N
T
S
,
E
T
C
.
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
177.06
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
15.94
BR
A
C
K
E
T
T
'
S
N
O
R
T
H
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
B
E
D
27
2
3
0
7
PE
R
E
N
N
I
A
L
S
,
L
I
L
Y
S
,
S
H
R
U
B
S
,
E
T
C
.
12
5
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
204.18
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
12
5
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
18.38
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
27
3
2
0
0
MU
L
C
H
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
53.94
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
4.85 Total :474.35
10
5
8
1
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
7
3
7
5
S
N
O
C
O
P
U
D
N
O
1
24
5
0
0
1
6
5
4
4
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
B
I
L
L
I
N
G
18
5
0
0
8
2
N
D
A
V
E
W
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
64.58
PA
R
K
&
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
S
H
O
P
24
7
0
0
1
1
8
3
0
PA
R
K
&
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
S
H
O
P
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
841.70
PL
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
B
L
E
A
C
H
E
R
S
32
8
0
0
1
7
1
7
3
PL
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
B
L
E
A
C
H
E
R
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
133.37
OL
Y
M
P
I
C
B
E
A
C
H
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
P
I
E
R
34
3
0
0
1
3
6
2
7
OL
Y
M
P
I
C
B
E
A
C
H
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
P
I
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
432.17
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
B
I
L
L
I
N
G
35
7
0
0
1
4
3
6
9
80
3
0
1
8
5
T
H
S
T
S
W
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
115.51 40 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
68
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
41
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
1
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
03
7
3
7
5
S
N
O
C
O
P
U
D
N
O
1
PA
R
K
G
A
Z
E
B
O
36
6
0
0
1
6
7
7
9
PA
R
K
G
A
Z
E
B
O
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
32.18
PL
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
L
I
G
H
T
S
36
9
0
0
1
7
8
3
9
PL
A
Y
F
I
E
L
D
L
I
G
H
T
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
111.27 Total :1,730.78
10
5
8
1
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
7
3
7
5
S
N
O
C
O
P
U
D
N
O
1
27
8
0
0
8
7
8
4
95
8
-
0
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
8
W
W
T
P
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
I
T
Y
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
1
.
6
1
22,261.14 Total :22,261.14
10
5
8
1
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
7
3
7
5
S
N
O
C
O
P
U
D
N
O
1
20
7
0
0
1
5
0
8
2
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
7
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
7
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
106.19
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
23
3
0
0
1
2
2
8
3
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
6
4
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
28.28
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
1
0
24
0
0
0
1
0
7
4
6
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
1
0
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
141.54
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
2
24
1
0
0
1
6
2
5
3
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
2
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
61.65
20
0
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
-
V
a
c
a
n
t
P
W
B
l
d
g
24
8
0
0
1
7
3
9
7
20
0
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
-
V
a
c
a
n
t
P
W
B
l
d
g
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
292.38
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
4
25
4
0
0
1
2
5
6
0
LI
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
#
4
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
355.04
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
27
9
0
0
2
2
2
2
8
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
6
4
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
48.70 41 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
69
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
42
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
1
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
03
7
3
7
5
S
N
O
C
O
P
U
D
N
O
1
SE
A
V
I
E
W
R
E
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
28
8
0
0
2
7
2
7
7
SE
A
V
I
E
W
R
E
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
29.26
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
33
5
0
0
1
4
9
0
2
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
6
4
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
41.82
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
37
2
0
0
1
2
0
5
7
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
2,138.25
SC
H
O
O
L
F
L
A
S
H
I
N
G
L
I
G
H
T
39
7
0
0
1
3
5
8
1
SC
H
O
O
L
F
L
A
S
H
I
N
G
L
I
G
H
T
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
6
4
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
29.74
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
42
1
0
0
1
3
9
0
2
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
6
4
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
47.29
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
43
3
0
0
1
4
1
2
9
SI
G
N
A
L
L
I
G
H
T
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
6
4
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
108.26
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
48
4
0
0
1
1
9
5
3
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
68.96
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
262.05
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
262.05
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
262.05
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
262.05
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
262.06
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
53
9
0
0
2
8
1
6
4
PU
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
C
O
M
P
L
E
X
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
4,468.51 42 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
70
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
43
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
1
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
03
7
3
7
5
S
N
O
C
O
P
U
D
N
O
1
CI
T
Y
H
A
L
L
54
1
0
0
1
0
6
8
9
CI
T
Y
H
A
L
L
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
7
0
.
0
0
2,405.86 Total :11,681.99
10
5
8
1
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
4
3
5
1
S
N
O
H
O
M
I
S
H
C
O
U
N
T
Y
T
R
E
A
S
U
R
E
R
2
0
0
8
0
8
8
IN
V
#
2
0
0
8
0
8
8
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
/
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
67
.
0
8
B
O
O
K
I
N
G
S
/
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
6,085.50
88
2
.
7
5
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
D
A
Y
S
/
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
3
.
6
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
0
0
52,761.97 Total :58,847.47
10
5
8
1
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
03
7
8
0
0
S
N
O
H
O
M
I
S
H
H
E
A
L
T
H
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
A
R
1
3
9
1
9
7
W
A
T
E
R
D
E
P
T
-
H
E
P
A
S
H
O
T
S
W
A
T
E
R
D
E
P
T
-
H
E
P
A
S
H
O
T
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
58.00 Total :58.00
10
5
8
1
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
0
3
7
1
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
I
N
S
U
R
A
N
C
E
C
O
Au
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
8
AU
G
U
S
T
2
0
0
8
P
R
E
M
I
U
M
S
Au
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
8
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
s
81
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
1
.
5
5
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
18,639.95 Total :18,639.95
10
5
8
2
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
4
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
W
Y
O
M
I
N
G
,
L
A
W
E
N
F
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
A
C
A
D
E
M
Y
BA
R
K
E
R
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
R
.
B
A
R
K
E
R
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
RE
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
/
R
.
B
A
R
K
E
R
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
4
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
625.00 Total :625.00
10
5
8
2
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
6
1
S
T
E
I
N
A
T
,
C
H
R
I
S
T
I
N
A
ST
E
I
N
A
T
0
7
2
2
RE
F
U
N
D
CL
A
S
S
R
E
F
U
N
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
80.00 Total :80.00
10
5
8
2
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
1
5
8
5
S
T
E
R
I
C
Y
C
L
E
I
N
C
3
0
0
0
0
9
2
7
4
1
IN
V
#
3
0
0
0
0
9
2
7
4
1
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
ON
-
C
A
L
L
/
M
O
N
T
H
L
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
F
E
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
9
1
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
10.36 43 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
71
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
44
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Total :10.36
10
5
8
2
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
1
5
8
5
0
7
1
5
8
5
S
T
E
R
I
C
Y
C
L
E
I
N
C
10
5
8
2
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
7
2
3
6
2
S
T
R
I
K
E
R
,
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
ST
R
I
K
E
R
0
7
1
6
RE
F
U
N
D
DA
M
A
G
E
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
R
E
F
U
N
D
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
9
.
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
480.00 Total :480.00
10
5
8
2
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
3
7
T
G
B
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
Rc
p
t
#
0
2
2
5
6
0
3
TG
B
R
e
f
u
n
d
A
r
c
h
t
i
t
e
c
t
s
R
e
c
p
t
0
2
2
5
6
0
3
TG
B
R
e
f
u
n
d
A
r
c
h
t
i
t
e
c
t
s
R
e
c
p
t
0
2
2
5
6
0
3
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
5
7
.
6
2
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
120.00 Total :120.00
10
5
8
2
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
5
4
5
9
T
H
E
H
E
R
A
L
D
S
U
B
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
11
8
4
3
4
1
9
HE
R
A
L
D
N
E
W
S
P
A
P
E
R
A
N
N
U
A
L
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
E
E
HE
R
A
L
D
N
E
W
S
P
A
P
E
R
A
N
N
U
A
L
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
E
E
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
31.08
HE
R
A
L
D
N
E
W
S
P
A
P
E
R
A
N
N
U
A
L
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
E
E
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
31.08
HE
R
A
L
D
N
E
W
S
P
A
P
E
R
A
N
N
U
A
L
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
E
E
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
31.08
HE
R
A
L
D
N
E
W
S
P
A
P
E
R
A
N
N
U
A
L
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
E
E
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
31.08
HE
R
A
L
D
N
E
W
S
P
A
P
E
R
A
N
N
U
A
L
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
F
E
E
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
9
0
.
0
0
31.08 Total :155.40
10
5
8
2
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
3
2
2
T
R
A
N
E
87
2
8
9
6
7
PS
S
V
C
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
-
P
S
~
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
287.00
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
25.55 Total :312.55
10
5
8
2
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
1
1
9
2
U
N
I
T
E
D
P
I
P
E
&
S
U
P
P
L
Y
79
1
0
4
1
2
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
44 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
72
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
45
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
2
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
1
1
9
2
U
N
I
T
E
D
P
I
P
E
&
S
U
P
P
L
Y
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
75.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
8.05
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
7.39
SU
P
P
L
I
E
S
79
2
6
3
5
5
IR
R
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
327.60
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
6
.
8
0
0
.
3
1
0
.
0
0
29.15 Total :447.19
10
5
8
2
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
1
1
9
2
U
N
I
T
E
D
P
I
P
E
&
S
U
P
P
L
Y
79
1
1
5
3
8
W
A
T
E
R
M
E
T
E
R
I
N
V
E
N
T
O
R
Y
-
~
W
A
T
E
R
M
E
T
E
R
I
N
V
E
N
T
O
R
Y
-
~
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
4
2
.
0
0
4,530.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
3
4
2
.
0
0
385.05 Total :4,915.05
10
5
8
2
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
04
3
9
3
5
U
P
S
2T
4
T
1
3
2
8
8
OP
S
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
re
t
u
r
n
s
h
i
p
m
e
n
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
36.97 Total :36.97
10
5
8
3
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
5
0
U
S
F
I
R
E
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
L
L
C
52
6
2
9
OP
S
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
V
E
C
L
O
T
H
I
N
G
No
m
e
x
c
h
i
n
s
t
r
a
p
s
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
0
0
34.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
0
0
2.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
2
5
0
.
0
0
3.20 Total :39.20
10
5
8
3
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
04
4
9
6
0
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
L
O
C
C
T
R
8
0
6
0
1
6
5
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
L
O
C
A
T
E
S
-
J
U
N
E
0
8
45 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
73
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
46
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
3
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
04
4
9
6
0
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
L
O
C
C
T
R
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
L
O
C
A
T
E
S
-
J
U
N
E
0
8
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
83.81
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
L
O
C
A
T
E
S
-
J
U
N
E
0
8
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
83.81
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
L
O
C
A
T
E
S
-
J
U
N
E
0
8
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
0
0
83.83 Total :251.45
10
5
8
3
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
1
1
9
0
0
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
42
5
-
7
7
5
-
1
3
4
4
BE
A
C
H
R
A
N
G
E
R
P
H
O
N
E
@
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
P
I
E
R
BE
A
C
H
R
A
N
G
E
R
P
H
O
N
E
@
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
P
I
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
4
.
3
5
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
54.25
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
42
5
-
7
7
5
-
2
6
4
5
YO
S
T
P
O
O
L
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
4
0
.
5
7
5
.
5
1
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
134.99 Total :189.24
10
5
8
3
3
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
1
1
9
0
0
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
42
5
7
1
2
-
0
4
2
3
03
0
2
6
0
1
0
3
2
7
9
7
5
9
2
0
7
AF
T
E
R
H
O
U
R
S
P
H
O
N
E
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
6
.
5
3
8
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
55.92 Total :55.92
10
5
8
3
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
1
9
0
0
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
42
5
-
2
0
6
-
7
1
4
7
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
S
C
A
N
A
L
A
R
M
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
S
C
A
N
A
L
A
R
M
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
14.93
FL
E
E
T
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
F
A
X
L
I
N
E
42
5
-
6
7
2
-
7
1
3
2
FL
E
E
T
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
F
A
X
L
I
N
E
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
79.85
TE
L
E
M
E
T
R
Y
L
I
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
42
5
-
7
7
5
-
1
5
3
4
TE
L
E
M
E
T
R
Y
L
I
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
160.64
TE
L
E
M
E
T
R
Y
L
I
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
298.33
Ra
d
i
o
L
i
n
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
&
U
B
42
5
-
7
7
5
-
7
8
6
5
Ra
d
i
o
L
i
n
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
&
U
B
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
52.44 46 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
74
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
47
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
3
4
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
01
1
9
0
0
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
P
H
O
N
E
42
5
-
7
7
6
-
1
2
8
1
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
P
H
O
N
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
45.73
1S
T
&
P
I
N
E
C
I
R
C
U
I
T
L
I
N
E
P
T
E
D
W
A
R
D
S
42
5
-
A
B
9
-
0
5
3
0
1s
t
&
P
i
n
e
C
i
r
c
u
i
t
L
i
n
e
f
o
r
P
t
E
d
w
a
r
d
s
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
40.53
PU
B
L
I
C
W
O
R
K
S
C
P
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
T
O
9
1
1
42
5
-
R
T
0
-
9
1
3
3
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
9
1
1
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
0
.
5
1
9
.
9
1
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
5.48
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
9
1
1
11
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
3
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
20.81
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
9
1
1
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
4
.
5
3
4
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
20.81
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
9
1
1
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
5
.
5
3
5
.
8
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
20.81
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
9
1
1
51
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
7
.
5
4
8
.
6
8
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
20.81
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
9
1
1
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
2
.
5
4
2
.
9
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
20.78 Total :801.95
10
5
8
3
5
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
01
1
9
0
0
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
42
5
-
7
7
4
-
0
9
4
4
FS
#
2
0
-
F
A
X
L
I
N
E
FS
#
2
0
-
F
A
X
L
I
N
E
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
49.83 Total :49.83
10
5
8
3
6
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
7
8
6
5
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
W
I
R
E
L
E
S
S
06
6
8
2
8
5
6
3
2
IN
V
#
0
6
6
8
2
8
5
6
3
2
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
CE
L
L
P
H
O
N
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
10
4
.
0
0
0
.
4
1
0
.
5
2
1
.
2
1
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
149.03 Total :149.03
10
5
8
3
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
7
2
1
6
V
I
K
I
N
G
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
C
O
3
6
8
6
8
FA
C
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
47 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
75
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
48
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
3
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
7
2
1
6
V
I
K
I
N
G
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
C
O
FA
C
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
317.50
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
28.26
FS
2
0
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
36
8
8
0
FS
2
0
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
210.50
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
18.73
PW
F
L
E
E
T
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
36
8
8
1
PW
F
L
E
E
T
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
264.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
23.50
PW
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
36
8
8
2
PW
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
317.50
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
28.26
SR
C
E
N
T
E
R
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
36
8
8
3
SR
C
E
N
T
E
R
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
264.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
23.50
FS
1
6
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
36
8
8
4
FS
1
6
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
317.50
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
28.26
BO
Y
S
&
G
I
R
L
S
C
L
U
B
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
36
8
8
5
BO
Y
S
&
G
I
R
L
S
C
L
U
B
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
157.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
13.97 48 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
76
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
49
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount
10
5
8
3
7
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
06
7
2
1
6
V
I
K
I
N
G
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
C
O
FS
1
7
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
36
8
8
6
FS
1
7
-
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
S
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
157.00
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
1
9
.
9
2
0
.
4
8
0
.
0
0
13.97 Total :2,183.45
10
5
8
3
8
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
0
6
5
0
3
5
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
A
T
E
P
A
T
R
O
L
I
0
8
0
3
6
5
3
8
IN
V
#
I
0
8
0
3
6
5
3
8
-
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
P
D
BA
C
G
R
O
U
N
D
S
F
O
R
J
U
N
E
2
0
0
8
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
7
.
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
134.75 Total :134.75
10
5
8
3
9
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
1
1
5
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
T
R
U
S
T
B
A
N
K
RE
T
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
M
T
6
RE
T
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
#
6
RE
T
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
#
6
11
6
.
0
0
0
.
6
5
1
.
5
9
4
.
1
9
0
.
6
5
0
.
0
0
27,692.95 Total :27,692.95
10
5
8
4
0
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
04
5
9
1
2
W
A
S
P
C
50
1
5
1
EL
E
C
T
R
O
N
I
C
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
EL
E
C
T
R
O
N
I
C
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
0
.
5
9
4
.
1
2
0
.
6
4
0
.
0
0
770.50 Total :770.50
10
5
8
4
1
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
06
8
1
0
6
W
E
L
C
O
M
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
6
1
9
0
OP
S
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
De
s
k
t
o
p
c
h
a
r
g
e
r
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
47.00
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
7.45
Sa
l
e
s
T
a
x
00
1
.
0
0
0
.
5
1
0
.
5
2
2
.
2
0
0
.
4
2
0
.
0
0
4.85 Total :59.30
10
5
8
4
2
7
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
07
2
3
4
9
Y
O
U
,
H
S
I
U
C
H
I
4-
5
2
6
7
5
RE
:
#
7
-
0
8
0
5
-
0
7
7
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
R
E
F
U
N
D
#7
-
0
8
0
5
-
0
7
7
U
B
R
e
f
u
n
d
U
B
C
s
t
#
0
0
1
9
1
6
8
0
41
1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
2
3
3
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
48.78 Total :48.78 49 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
77
of
42
6
07
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
8
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
L
i
s
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
50
11
:
0
5
:
3
6
A
M
Page:
vc
h
l
i
s
t
Ba
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
Da
t
e
Ve
n
d
o
r
In
v
o
i
c
e
PO
#
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
/Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Amount Bank total :
1
,
0
3
1
,
1
0
3
.
2
5
16
1
V
o
u
c
h
e
r
s
f
o
r
b
a
n
k
c
o
d
e
:
fr
o
n
t
1,031,103.25 Total vouchers :
Vo
u
c
h
e
r
s
i
n
t
h
i
s
r
e
p
o
r
t
16
1
50 Page:
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
78
of
42
6
AM-1686 2.D.
Claims for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from William David Barnum & Cheryl Barnum
(amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute
entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
A Claim for Damages has been received from the following individuals:
William David Barnum and Cheryl Barnum
1323 11th Place North
Edmonds, WA 98020
(Amount undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Barnum Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 09:17 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 09:19 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 01:30 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 07/22/2008 12:02
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 79 of 426
Packet Page 80 of 426
Packet Page 81 of 426
Packet Page 82 of 426
AM-1689 2.E.
Yellow Cab Taxicab Operator's LIcense
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of 2008 Taxicab Operator's License for Yellow Cab of Washington.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council approve the 2008 Taxicab Operator's License for Yellow
Cab of Washington.
Previous Council Action
The City Council last approved the license for this taxi company on 05/08/07.
Narrative
Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.60 requires that the City Council approve Taxicab Operator's
Licenses. A copy of the application submitted by this taxi company is attached.
The Police Department has reviewed and approved the application.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Application
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 09:56 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 11:16 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 01:30 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 07/24/2008 09:53
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 83 of 426
Packet Page 84 of 426
Packet Page 85 of 426
Packet Page 86 of 426
Packet Page 87 of 426
Packet Page 88 of 426
Packet Page 89 of 426
AM-1688 2.F.
Supplemental Agreement 4 for Olympic View Drive Improvements
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Rob English Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 4 with CH2M Hill for Olympic
View Drive Water Main and Sewer Laterals project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 4 to the Olympic View Drive
water main and sewer laterals project.
Previous Council Action
On October 7, 2003, Council authorized the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement (ILA) with the
City of Lynnwood for the Olympic View Drive water main and sewer laterals design and
construction.
On November 3, 2003, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a professional services agreement
with CH2M Hill for design of the Olympic View Drive water main and sewer laterals installation.
On March 25, 2008, Council approved an amended ILA with the City of Lynnwood to include
installation of City of Edmonds fiber optic conduit and storm drainage improvements in
conjunction with the Olympic View Drive Improvements project.
On May 6, 2008, Council approved the City of Lynnwood award of a contract for Phase I of the
Olympic View Drive Improvements project (including both Lynnwood and Edmonds work) to
West Coast Construction.
Narrative
The City of Lynnwood Olympic View Drive (OVD) improvements project is planned to provide
safe walking routes and repair the failing portions of the OVD roadway. The project was divided
into two phases. Phase 1, from 178th Place SW to 168th Street SW, has been awarded to West
Coast Construction, and the construction of the project has begun. Phase 2, from 76th Avenue
West to 178th Place SW, is now entering final design phase, and construction will begin
following completion of the first phase, which is anticipated to be in 2009.
The City of Edmonds and the consultant, CH2M Hill, have negotiated a scope and budget for
Final Design Development of Phase 2 of the project. Supplemental Agreement No. 4, which
Packet Page 90 of 426
includes this design phase, is included as Attachment 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: CH2M Hill Supplement 4
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 03:08 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 04:43 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/25/2008 08:34 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni
Curtis
Started On: 07/24/2008 09:43
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/25/2008
Packet Page 91 of 426
Packet Page 92 of 426
Packet Page 93 of 426
Packet Page 94 of 426
Packet Page 95 of 426
Packet Page 96 of 426
Packet Page 97 of 426
Packet Page 98 of 426
Packet Page 99 of 426
Packet Page 100 of 426
Packet Page 101 of 426
Packet Page 102 of 426
AM-1693 2.G.
Amend Ordinance 3691 to Insert a Hearing Date
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Submitted For:City Attorney Scott Snyder Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance amending the provisions of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 3691 in order to insert a hearing
date.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the proposed ordinance.
Previous Council Action
On July 22, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3691, an interim zoning ordinance
amending the provisions of Chapter 16.43 BD (Downtown Business) by adding a Section
16.43.035 to clarify and supplement the procedures applicable to the ground floor requirements in
the BD-1 zone.
Narrative
The City Council passed an interim zoning ordinance on July 22, 2008 as Ordinance No. 3691.
Section 2 purported to call for a public hearing but no date was established.
The proposed ordinance before you this evening amends the provisions of Section 2 of Ordinance
No. 3691 in order to insert a hearing date. The public hearing will be set on September 16, 2008.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proposed Ordinance (Amendment)
Link: Ordinance 3691
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 02:25 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 02:28 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 04:28 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 07/24/2008 02:19
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 103 of 426
Packet Page 104 of 426
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
7/24/08
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 3691 IN ORDER TO
INSERT A HEARING DATE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City Council passed an interim zoning ordinance on July 22,
2008 as Ordinance No. 3691; and
WHEREAS, Section 2 purported to call for a public hearing but no date was
established; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 3691 is hereby amended and supplemented to establish
a hearing date regarding the interim zoning ordinance enacted by Ordinance No. 3691 for
September 16, 2008. The City staff is requested to work with the Planning Board to bring back,
following public hearing, any potential amendment which would permit the broadest and most
effective use of the ground floor commercial space while recognizing that the BD-1 zone is
essential to the character of the Edmonds community. If at all possible, the City Council
requests that suggested amendments to the interim zoning ordinance be proposed or a timeline
suggested on the hearing date in order that such changes can be considered in the most
expeditious manner consistent with the Planning Board’s schedule, appropriate public notice and
meeting dates.
{WSS701545.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 105 of 426
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS701545.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 106 of 426
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 3691 IN ORDER TO INSERT A
HEARING DATE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2008.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{WSS701545.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 3 -
Packet Page 107 of 426
{WSS701064.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
7/17/08
ORDINANCE NO. 3691
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER
16.43 BD (DOWNTOWN BUSINESS) BY ADDING A
SECTION 16.43.035 TO CLARIFY AND SUPPLEMENT THE
PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO THE GROUND FLOOR
REQUIREMENTS IN THE BD-1 ZONE, SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING DATE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 16.43 BD (Downtown Business) establishes requirements
for the BD zones including BD-1; and
WHEREAS, the intent of the Council as expressed in its legislative record and the
plain wording of the chapter is to require that the ground floor of all developments in the BD-1
be devoted entirely to commercial uses and be no less than fifteen feet in height; and
WHEREAS, a potential applicant for development in the BD-1 zone has
requested clarification from the staff in the form of a code interpretation, and staff has affirmed
the Council's intent and understanding; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that substantial monies may be invested
by property owners in reliance on their understanding of code provisions and wishes to provide
clear guidance in line with its past intent, and what the City Council believes to be the clear,
current language of the code as it relates to the BD-1 zone; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.390 authorizes the uses
of an interim zoning ordinance where the City Council finds that the health, safety and welfare
so require; and
Packet Page 108 of 426
{WSS701064.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to refer this matter to the Planning Board
and encourages the Planning Board to work with property owners and citizens in the downtown
area to review the existing code provisions and this interpretation, in order to make
recommendations that would permit property owners to make profitable and efficient use of their
properties while meeting the purposes and intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the BD-1
zone; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 16.43 is
hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection 16.43.035 Application of Requirements to
the BD-1 Zone, as an interim zoning ordinance:
16.43.035 Application of requirements to the BD-1 zone.
The application and interpretation of Chapter 16.43 BD Downtown
Business to any development permit or application within the BD-
1 zone shall conform to the requirements of this section. These
requirements are enacted in order to clarify the intent of the City
Council and the application of existing language of the Code. In
the event of conflict or ambiguity with any provision of this
chapter, or the definition sections of the Community Development
Code, these provisions shall control.
The ground floor of the development in the BD-1 zone shall be
devoted entirely to commercial uses as provided by the first
sentence of ECDC 16.43.030(B)(3). The ground floor shall be no
less than fifteen feet in height measured in accordance with ECDC
16.43.030. Except to the minimum extent necessary to exercise
the rights granted pursuant to ECDC 16.43.030(B)(2)(b), the
ground floor shall be in one plane, extending the entire width and
breadth of the building.
Section 2. In accordance with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.390, a public
hearing shall be held on this matter on _____________, 2008 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as
the public may be heard. Such date is within sixty days of the adoption of this ordinance.
Packet Page 109 of 426
{WSS701064.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Section 3. The City Council refers this matter to the Planning Board for its
review and recommendation. In addition to recommendations regarding the changes necessary
to address this interim ordinance, the Planning Board is encouraged to work with property
owners and citizens to make recommendations regarding how the purposes of the BD-1 zone and
the Comprehensive Plan can be met while providing for the efficient and economically viable
use of property in the BD-1 zone. The Planning Board is encouraged to consider and make
recommendations regarding any change which would improve the economic viability of
businesses which utilize the commercial space established and constructed pursuant to these
provisions.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title. This interim ordinance shall expire on its own terms six months after the effective date
unless extended or repealed by action of the City Council.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
Packet Page 110 of 426
{WSS701064.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 07/18/2008
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 07/22/2008
PUBLISHED: 07/27/2008
EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2008
ORDINANCE NO. 3691
Packet Page 111 of 426
{WSS701064.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3691
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 22nd day of July, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. 3691. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN
INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 16.43 BD
(DOWNTOWN BUSINESS) BY ADDING A SECTION 16.43.035 TO CLARIFY AND
SUPPLEMENT THE PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO THE GROUND FLOOR
REQUIREMENTS IN THE BD-1 ZONE, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE, AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 23rd day of July, 2008.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 112 of 426
AM-1687 4.
Second Reading: Ordinance Granting A Nonexclusive Franchise To Verizon
Northwest Inc.
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Time:10 Minutes
Department:Community Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Second Reading: An ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington granting a nonexclusive
franchise to Verizon Northwest, Inc. to construct, maintain, operate and repair a cable
system to provide cable services in, across, over, along, under, upon, through and below the
public rights-of-way of the City of Edmonds; providing for severability and establishing an
effective date.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
1. Approve Ordinance #______ and adopt the proposed Cable Franchise Agreement between the
City of Edmonds and Verizon Northwest Inc.; and
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the proposed Franchise Agreement on behalf of the City.
Previous Council Action
On February 26, 2008, the City Council directed the City Attorney to continue with a schedule
which outlined possible "Next Steps" regarding negotiations with Verizon.
On March 25, 2008, the City Council authorized Mayor Haakenson to sign an Interlocal
Agreement Consortium For Negotiation of Cable Television Franchising, in addition to preparing
and executing a Consultant Agreement with River Oaks.
On July 22, 2008, the City Council conducted a first reading and public hearing related to the
proposed Cable Franchise Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Verizon Northwest Inc.
Narrative
Verizon Northwest Inc. (“Verizon”) seeks to provide cable television service, utilizing a Fiber to
the Premise Telecommunications Network to City of Edmonds (“City”) residents, businesses and
institutions in competition with the existing cable television operator serving the City. In order to
do so, Verizon and the City must first execute a cable franchise agreement. As such, Verizon has
requested, from the City, a franchise to operate and provide cable television service within
incorporated areas of the City.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Packet Page 113 of 426
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Franchise Agreement
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 10:10 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 11:16 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 01:30 PM APRV
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 07/23/2008 05:22
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 114 of 426
0006.080052
ERZ
7/17/2008
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON GRANTING A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE
TO VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC. TO CONSTRUCT,
MAINTAIN, OPERATE AND REPAIR A CABLE SYSTEM TO
PROVIDE CABLE SERVICES IN, ACROSS, OVER, ALONG,
UNDER, UPON, THROUGH AND BELOW THE PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds (the “City”) has negotiated a Franchise
Agreement with Verizon Northwest, Inc. (“Verizon”), granting Verizon a franchise, authority, right
and privilege for a period of fifteen (15) years to construct, maintain, operate and repair a cable
system in the City, as set forth in the Franchise Agreement attached hereto, labeled Exhibit A and
hereby incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, Verizon has requested that the City grant it a new franchise for the
provision of cable television services within the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.11.030 and 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1), the City has
the power, among other things, to grant franchises; and
WHEREAS, the City has analyzed and considered the technical ability, financial
condition, legal qualifications, and general character of Verizon, warrants that all other conditions
resulting from the grant of this Franchise have been considered by the City, and has determined that
it is in the best interest of the City and its residents to grant a cable Franchise to Verizon; and
WHEREAS, Verizon and the City have agreed to be bound by the conditions
hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE,
{ERZ699840.DOC;2/00006.080052/} 1
Packet Page 115 of 426
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Franchise Granted. Pursuant to RCW 35A.47.040, the City of Edmonds
hereby grants a nonexclusive franchise to Verizon Northwest, Inc. according to the terms and
conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full. Subject to the provisions therein, the term of the franchise shall be for a period of
fifteen (15) years from the effective date of the franchise, as defined in Exhibit A, and shall grant
Verizon the right, privilege and authority to construct, maintain, operate, and repair a cable system
to provide cable services in, on, across, over, along, under, upon, through and below the public
rights-of-way of the City of Edmonds, all as provided in Exhibit A.
Section 2. Deadline for Acceptance. The franchise granted by Section 1 of this
ordinance shall be void and of no effect unless Verizon files with the City Clerk written acceptance
of the franchise and all of its terms and conditions within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of
this ordinance and in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. Pursuant to RCW 35A.47.040, this ordinance has been
passed at least five days after its first introduction and by a majority of the whole membership of
the City Council at a regular meeting. This ordinance, being the exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City’s legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five
(5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary consisting of the title.
{ERZ699840.DOC;2/00006.080052/} 2
Packet Page 116 of 426
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{ERZ699840.DOC;2/00006.080052/} 3
Packet Page 117 of 426
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON GRANTING A
NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC. TO CONSTRUCT,
MAINTAIN, OPERATE AND REPAIR A CABLE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE CABLE
SERVICES IN, ACROSS, OVER, ALONG, UNDER, UPON, THROUGH AND BELOW THE
PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2008.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{ERZ699840.DOC;2/00006.080052/} 4
Packet Page 118 of 426
CABLE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
AND
VERIZON NORTHWEST INC.
2008
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119
Packet Page 119 of 426
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE PAGE
1. DEFINITIONS...................................................................................................................2
2. GRANT OF AUTHORITY; LIMITS AND RESERVATIONS.......................................7
3. PROVISION OF CABLE SERVICE................................................................................9
4. SYSTEM OPERATION..................................................................................................11
5. SYSTEM FACILITIES ...................................................................................................11
6. EG SERVICES................................................................................................................12
7. FRANCHISE FEES.........................................................................................................14
8. CUSTOMER SERVICE..................................................................................................16
9. REPORTS AND RECORDS...........................................................................................16
10. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION....................................................................17
11. TRANSFER OF FRANCHISE........................................................................................19
12. RENEWAL OF FRANCHISE.........................................................................................20
13. ENFORCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF FRANCHISE........................................20
14. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS................................................................................23
EXHIBIT A INITIAL SERVICE AREA ..................................................................................28
EXHIBIT B MUNICIPAL LOCATIONS AND SCHOOLS TO BE PROVIDED FREE
CABLE SERVICE.................................................................................................29
EXHIBIT C REMITTANCE FORM.........................................................................................32
EXHIBIT D CUSTOMER SERVICE STANDARDS..............................................................33
EXHIBIT E PERFORMANCE BOND.....................................................................................43
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 ii
Packet Page 120 of 426
THIS CABLE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT (the “Franchise” or “Agreement”) is entered
into by and between the City of Edmonds, a duly organized City under the applicable laws of the
State of Washington (the “City”) and Verizon Northwest Inc., a corporation duly organized
under the applicable laws of the State of Washington (the “Franchisee”).
WHEREAS, the City wishes to grant Franchisee a nonexclusive franchise to construct,
install, maintain, extend and operate a cable communications system in the Franchise Area as
designated in this Franchise;
WHEREAS, the City is a “franchising authority” in accordance with Title VI of the
Communications Act (see 47 U.S.C. § 522(10)) and is authorized to grant one or more
nonexclusive cable franchises pursuant to Washington State law and federal law;
WHEREAS, Franchisee is in the process of installing a Fiber to the Premise
Telecommunications Network (the “FTTP Network”) in the Franchise Area for the transmission
of Non-Cable Services pursuant to authority granted by the state of Washington;
WHEREAS, Franchisee intends to construct, install, maintain, and extend the FTTP
Network pursuant to Title II of the Communications Act (see 47 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), and has
requested a cable franchise from the City to operate a Cable System over, under, and along the
Public Rights-of-Way within the City’s jurisdiction, in accordance with Title VI of the
Communications Act (see 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq.);
WHEREAS, the FTTP Network will occupy the Public Rights-of-Way within the City,
and Franchisee desires to use portions of the FTTP Network once installed to provide Cable
Services (as hereinafter defined) in the Franchise Area;
WHEREAS, the City has identified the future cable-related needs and interests of the
City and its community, has considered the financial, technical and legal qualifications of
Franchisee, and has determined that Franchisee’s plans for its Cable System are adequate, in a
full public proceeding affording due process to all parties;
WHEREAS, the City desires to protect and manage the Public Rights-of-Way, require
high standards of customer service, receive financial compensation relating to Franchisee’s use
of the Public Rights-of-Way as provided by federal law, obtain educational and governmental
channels, establish certain reporting and record access requirements, and provide for the future
cable-related needs of its residents;
WHEREAS, the City has found Franchisee to be financially, technically, and legally
qualified to operate the Cable System;
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the grant of a nonexclusive franchise to
Franchisee is consistent with the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City and Franchisee have reached agreement on the terms and
conditions set forth herein and the parties have agreed to be bound by those terms and
conditions.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 1
Packet Page 121 of 426
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City’s grant of a franchise to Franchisee,
Franchisee’s promise to provide Cable Service to residents of the Franchise Area of the City
pursuant to and consistent with the Communications Act (as hereinafter defined), pursuant to the
terms and conditions set forth herein, the promises and undertakings herein, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and the adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
THE PARTIES DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. DEFINITIONS
Except as otherwise provided herein, the definitions and word usages set forth in the
Communications Act (as hereinafter defined) are incorporated herein and shall apply in this
Agreement. In addition, the following definitions shall apply:
1.1 Access Channel: A video Channel, which Franchisee shall make available to the
City without charge for non-commercial Educational or Governmental use for the transmission
of video programming as directed by the City.
1.1.1 Educational Access Channel: An Access Channel available for the use
solely of the local schools (schools shall include any educational institution, public or private,
but excluding home schools) in the Franchise Area.
1.1.2 Government Access Channel: An Access Channel available for the use
solely of the City.
1.1.3 EG: Educational and Governmental.
1.2 Additional Service Area: Shall mean any such portion of the Service Area added
pursuant to Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement.
1.3 Affiliate: Any Person who, directly or indirectly, owns or controls, is owned or
controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with Franchisee.
1.4 Basic Service: Any service tier, which includes the retransmission of local
television broadcast signals as well as the EG Channels required by this Franchise.
1.5 Cable Operator: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under section 602 of the
Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), but does not include direct broadcast satellite
providers.
1.6 Cable Service or Cable Services: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under
section 602 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 522(6).
1.7 Cable System or System: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under Section
602 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 522(7), meaning, “a facility, consisting of a set of
closed transmission paths and associated signal generation, reception, and control equipment that
is designed to provide cable service which includes video programming and which is provided to
multiple subscribers within a community, but such term does not include (A) a facility that
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 2
Packet Page 122 of 426
serves only to retransmit the television signals of 1 or more television broadcast stations; (B) a
facility that serves subscribers without using any public right-of-way; (C) a facility of a common
carrier which is subject, in whole or in part, to the provisions of title II of this Act, except that
such facility shall be considered a cable system (other than for purposes of section 621(c)) to the
extent such facility is used in the transmission of video programming directly to subscribers,
unless the extent of such use is solely to provide interactive on-demand services; (D) an open
video system that complies with section 653 of this title; or (E) any facilities of any electric
utility used solely for operating its electric utility systems.” The Cable System shall be limited to
the optical spectrum wavelength(s), bandwidth or future technological capacity that is used for
the transmission of Cable Services directly to Subscribers within the Franchise/Service Area and
shall not include the tangible network facilities of a common carrier subject, in whole or in part,
to Title II of the Communications Act or of an Information Services provider.
1.8 Channel: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under section 602 of the
Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 522(4).
1.9 City: The City of Edmonds or the lawful successor, transferee, or assignee
thereof.
1.10 Communications Act: The Communications Act of 1934, as amended by, among
other things, the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, the Cable Consumer Protection and
Competition Act of 1992, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as it may be further
amended from time to time.
1.11 Control: The ability to exercise de facto or de jure control over day-to-day
policies and operations or the management of Franchisee’s affairs.
1.12 FCC: The United States Federal Communications Commission or successor
governmental entity thereto.
1.13 Fiber to the Premise Telecommunications Network (“FTTP Network”): The
Franchisee’s network that transmits Non-Cable Services pursuant to the authority granted under
the laws of the state of Washington and under Title II of the Communications Act (which Non-
Cable Services are not subject to Title VI of the Communications Act), and that supports the
Cable System.
1.14 Force Majeure: Force Majeure is an event or events reasonably beyond the
ability of Franchisee to anticipate and control, such as:
(a) severe or unusual weather conditions, fire, flood, or other acts of God,
strikes, labor disturbances, lockouts, war or act of war (whether an actual declaration of war is
made or not), insurrection, riots or act of a public enemy;
(b) actions or inactions of any government instrumentality or public utility
including condemnation, accidents for which Franchisee is not primarily responsible or work
delays caused by waiting for other utility providers to service or monitor utility poles to which
Franchisee’s FTTP Network is attached, and unavailability of materials and/or qualified labor to
perform the work necessary; and
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 3
Packet Page 123 of 426
(c) telephone network outages only when such outages are outside the control
of Franchisee.
1.15 Franchise Area: The incorporated area (entire existing territorial limits) of the
City and such additional areas as may be included in the corporate (territorial) limits of the City
during the term of this Franchise.
1.16 Franchisee: Verizon Northwest Inc., and its lawful and permitted successors,
assigns and transferees.
1.17 Gross Revenue: All revenue, as determined in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, which is derived by Franchisee and/or its Affiliates from the
operation of the Cable System to provide Cable Service in the Service Area. Gross Revenue
shall include but may not be limited to the following items so long as all other Cable Operators
in the Service Area include the same in Gross Revenues for purposes of calculating franchise
fees:
(a) fees charged for Basic Service;
(b) fees charged to Subscribers for any service tier other than Basic Service;
(c) fees charged for premium Channel(s), e.g. HBO, Cinemax, or Showtime;
(d) fees charged to Subscribers for any optional, per-channel, or per-program
services;
(e) charges for installation, additional outlets, relocation, disconnection,
reconnection, and change-in-service fees for video or audio programming;
(f) fees for downgrading any level of Cable Service programming;
(g) fees for service calls;
(h) fees for leasing of Channels;
(i) rental of customer equipment, including converters (e.g. set top boxes,
high definition converters, and digital video recorders) and remote control devices;
(j) advertising revenue as set forth herein;
(k) revenue from the sale or lease of access Channel(s) or Channel capacity;
(l) revenue from the sale or rental of Subscriber lists;
(m) revenues or commissions received from the carriage of home shopping
channels;
(n) fees for any and all music services that are deemed to be a Cable Service
over a Cable System;
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 4
Packet Page 124 of 426
(o) revenue from the sale of program guides;
(p) late payment fees;
(q) forgone revenue that Franchisee chooses not to receive in exchange for
trades, barters, services, or other items of value;
(r) revenue from NSF check charges;
(s) revenue received from programmers as payment for programming content
cablecast on the Cable System; and
(t) Franchise Fees hereunder.
Advertising commissions paid to independent third parties shall not be deducted from
advertising revenue included in Gross Revenue. Advertising revenue is based upon the ratio of
the number of Subscribers as of the last day of the period for which Gross Revenue is being
calculated to the number of Franchisee’s Subscribers within all areas covered by the particular
advertising source as of the last day of such period, e.g., Franchisee sells two ads: Ad “A” is
broadcast nationwide; Ad “B” is broadcast only within Washington. Franchisee has one hundred
(100) Subscribers in the Franchise Area, five hundred (500) Subscribers in Washington, and one
thousand (1,000) Subscribers nationwide. Gross Revenue as to the City from Ad “A” is ten
percent (10%) of Franchisee’s revenue therefrom. Gross Revenue as to the City from Ad “B” is
twenty percent (20%) of Franchisee’s revenue therefrom.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Gross Revenue shall not include:
1.17.1 Revenues received by any Affiliate or other Person in exchange for
supplying goods or services used by Franchisee to provide Cable Service over the Cable System;
1.17.2 Bad debts written off by Franchisee in the normal course of its business,
provided, however, that bad debt recoveries shall be included in Gross Revenue during the
period collected;
1.17.3 Refunds, rebates or discounts made to Subscribers or other third parties;
1.17.4 Any revenues classified, in whole or in part, as Non-Cable Services
revenue under federal or state law including, without limitation, revenue received from
Telecommunications Services; revenue received from Information Services, including, without
limitation, Internet Access service, electronic mail service, electronic bulletin board service, or
similar online computer services; and any other revenues attributed by Franchisee to Non-Cable
Services in accordance with FCC or state public utility regulatory commission rules, regulations,
standards or orders, provided that if any such services are Cable Services at any future time
pursuant to applicable law, revenues derived from such services shall be included in Gross
Revenues;
1.17.5 Payments by Subscribers for merchandise purchased from any home
shopping channel offered as part of the Cable Services; provided, however, that commissions or
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 5
Packet Page 125 of 426
other compensation paid to Franchisee by such home shopping channel for the promotion or
exhibition of products or services shall be included in Gross Revenue;
1.17.6 Revenues from the sale of Cable Services on the Cable System to a
reseller, when the reseller pays the cable Franchise fees on the resale of Cable Services;
1.17.7 Any tax of general applicability imposed upon Franchisee or upon
Subscribers by a city, state, federal or any other governmental entity and required to be collected
by Franchisee and remitted to the taxing entity (including, but not limited to, sales/use tax, gross
receipts tax, excise tax, utility users tax, public service tax, communication taxes and non-cable
franchise fees), provided however, as set forth in Section 1.17(t), Franchise Fees under this
Agreement are included in Gross Revenues;
1.17.8 Any foregone revenue which Franchisee chooses not to receive in
exchange for its provision of free or reduced cost cable or other communications services to any
Person, including without limitation, employees of Franchisee and public institutions or other
institutions designated in the Franchise; provided, however, that such foregone revenue which
Franchisee chooses not to receive in exchange for trades, barters, services or other items of value
shall be included in Gross Revenue;
1.17.9 Sales of capital assets or sales of surplus equipment;
1.17.10 Reimbursement by programmers of marketing costs incurred by
Franchisee for the introduction of new programming pursuant to a written marketing agreements;
1.17.11 Directory or Internet advertising revenue including, but not limited to,
yellow page, white page, banner advertisement and electronic publishing;
1.17.12 Any fees or charges collected from Subscribers or other third parties
for EG Grant.
1.18 Information Services: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under Title I,
Section 3 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §153(20).
1.19 Initial Service Area: The portion of the Franchise Area as outlined in Exhibit A.
1.20 Internet Access: Dial-up or broadband access service that enables Subscribers to
access the Internet.
1.21 Non-Cable Services: Any service that does not constitute the provision of Video
Programming directly to multiple Subscribers in the Franchise Area including, but not limited to,
Information Services and Telecommunications Services.
1.22 Normal Operating Conditions: Those service conditions which are within the
control of the Franchisee. Those conditions which are not within the control of the Franchisee
include, but are not limited to, natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, telephone
network outages (to the extent such outages are on non-Verizon networks or caused by Force
Majeure), and severe or unusual weather conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 6
Packet Page 126 of 426
within the control of the Franchisee include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay-per-
view events, rate increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or rebuild
of the Cable System. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.309(c)(4)(ii).
1.23 Person: An individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust,
corporation, or governmental entity.
1.24 Public Rights-of-Way: The surface and the area across, in, over, along, upon and
below the surface of the public streets, roads, bridges, sidewalks, lanes, courts, ways, alleys, and
boulevards, including, public utility easements and public lands and waterways (to the extent the
City has authority to grant the use of such waterways) used as Public Rights-of-Way, as the same
now or may thereafter exist, which are under the jurisdiction or control of the City. Public
Rights-of-Way do not include the airwaves above a right-of-way with regard to cellular or other
nonwire communications or broadcast services, nor do Public Rights-of-Way include real
property owned in fee by the City unless such property is a public right-of-way.
1.25 Service Area: All portions of the Franchise Area where Cable Service is being
offered, including the Initial Service Area and any Additional Service areas.
1.26 Service Date: The date that the Franchisee first provides Cable Service on a
commercial basis directly to multiple Subscribers in the Franchise Area. The Franchisee shall
memorialize the Service Date by notifying the City in writing of the same, which notification
shall become a part of this Franchise.
1.27 Service Interruption: The loss of picture or sound on one or more cable channels.
1.28 Subscriber: A Person who lawfully receives Cable Service over the Cable System
with Franchisee’s express permission.
1.29 Telecommunications Facilities: Franchisee’s existing Telecommunications
Services and Information Services facilities and its FTTP Network facilities.
1.30 Telecommunications Services: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under
Section 3 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 153(46).
1.31 Title II: Title II of the Communications Act.
1.32 Title VI: Title VI of the Communications Act.
1.33 Video Programming: Shall be defined herein as it is defined under Section 602 of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 522(20).
2. GRANT OF AUTHORITY; LIMITS AND RESERVATIONS
2.1 Grant of Authority: Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
Communications Act, the City hereby grants the Franchisee the right to own, construct, operate
and maintain a Cable System along the Public Rights-of-Way within the Franchise Area, in order
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 7
Packet Page 127 of 426
to provide Cable Service. No privilege or power of eminent domain is bestowed by this grant;
nor is such a privilege or power bestowed by this Agreement.
2.2 City’s Regulatory Authority: The parties recognize that Franchisee’s FTTP
Network is being constructed and will be operated and maintained as an upgrade to and/or
extension of its existing Telecommunications Facilities for the provision of Non-Cable Services.
The jurisdiction of the City over such Telecommunications Facilities is also governed by federal
and state law, and the City shall not assert jurisdiction over Franchisee’s FTTP Network in
contravention of those laws. Therefore, as provided in Section 621 of the Communications Act,
47 U.S.C. § 541, the City’s regulatory authority under Title VI of the Communications Act is not
applicable to the construction, installation, maintenance, or operation of Franchisee’s FTTP
Network to the extent the FTTP Network is constructed, installed, maintained, or operated for
the purpose of upgrading and/or extending Verizon’s existing Telecommunications Facilities for
the provision of Non-Cable Services. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect the City's authority,
if any, to adopt and enforce lawful regulations with respect to Franchisee's Telecommunications
Facilities in the Public Rights-of-Way.
2.3 Term: This Franchise shall become effective on _____, 2008 (the “Effective
Date”). The Term of this Franchise shall be fifteen (15) years from the Effective Date unless the
Franchise is earlier revoked as provided herein.
2.4 Grant Not Exclusive: The Franchise and the rights granted herein to use and
occupy the Public Rights-of-Way to provide Cable Services shall not be exclusive, and the City
reserves the right to grant other franchises for similar uses or for other uses of the Public Rights-
of-Way, or any portions thereof, to any Person, or to make any such use themselves, at any time
during the term of this Franchise. Any such rights which are granted shall not adversely impact
the authority as granted under this Franchise.
2.5 Franchise Subject to Federal and State Law: Notwithstanding any provision to
the contrary herein, this Franchise is subject to and shall be governed by all applicable provisions
of federal law and state law as they may be amended, including but not limited to the
Communications Act and any applicable rules, regulations, and orders of the FCC, as amended.
2.6 No Waiver:
2.6.1 The failure of the City on one or more occasions to exercise a right or to
require compliance or performance under this Franchise, the Communications Act or any other
applicable state or federal law shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of such right or a
waiver of compliance or performance by the City nor to excuse Franchisee from complying or
performing, unless such right or such compliance or performance has been specifically waived in
writing.
2.6.2 The failure of Franchisee on one or more occasions to exercise a right
under this Franchise or applicable law, or to require performance under this Franchise, shall not
be deemed to constitute a waiver of such right or of performance of this Agreement, nor shall it
excuse the City from performance, unless such right or performance has been specifically waived
in writing.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 8
Packet Page 128 of 426
2.7 Construction of Agreement:
2.7.1 The provisions of this Franchise shall be liberally construed to effect their
objectives.
2.7.2 Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the scope or applicability of
Section 625 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 545.
2.8 Police Powers: In executing this Franchise Agreement, the Franchisee
acknowledges that its rights hereunder are subject to the lawful police powers of the City.
Franchisee agrees to comply with all lawful and applicable general laws and ordinances enacted
by the City pursuant to such power. Nothing in the Franchise shall be construed to prohibit the
reasonable, necessary and lawful exercise of the City’s police powers. However, if the
reasonable, necessary and lawful exercise of the City’s police power results in any material
alteration of the terms and conditions of this Franchise, then the parties shall modify this
Franchise to the mutual satisfaction of both parties to ameliorate the negative effects on the
Franchisee of the material alteration. Any modifications shall be in writing and signed by both
parties. If the parties cannot reach agreement on the above-referenced modification to the
Franchise, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation. The matter submitted to
mediation shall be limited to what effect, if any, the City’s exercise of police powers has on the
terms of the Franchise. In the event mediation does not result in an agreement, then the
Franchisee may terminate this Agreement without further obligation to the City or, at
Franchisee’s option, the parties agree to submit the matter to binding arbitration in accordance
with the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association (but not
necessarily administered by the American Arbitration Association) or as otherwise mutually
agreed by the parties. The matter submitted to arbitration shall be limited to what effect, if any,
the City’s exercise of police powers has on the terms of the Franchise. Nothing in this provision
shall require the City to pay for the relocation of Telecommunications Facilities. Such matters
are outside the scope of this provision and both parties reserve their rights with respect to such
matters.
2.9 Termination of Telecommunications Services. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, if Franchisee ceases to provide Telecommunications Services over
the FTTP Network at any time during the Term and is not otherwise authorized to occupy the
Public Rights-of-Way in the Franchise Area, the City may regulate the FTTP Network as a cable
system to the extent permitted by Title VI.
3. PROVISION OF CABLE SERVICE
3.1 Service Area:
3.1.1 Initial Service Area: Franchisee shall offer Cable Service to significant
numbers of Subscribers in residential areas of the Initial Service Area and may make Cable
Service available to businesses in the Initial Service Area, within twelve (12) months of the
Service Date of this Franchise, and shall offer Cable Service to all residential areas in the Initial
Service Area within thirty-six (36) months of the Service Date of the Franchise, except: (A) for
periods of Force Majeure; (B) for periods of delay caused by the City; (C) for periods of delay
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 9
Packet Page 129 of 426
resulting from Franchisee’s inability to obtain authority to access rights-of-way in the Service
Area; (D) in areas where developments or buildings are subject to claimed exclusive
arrangements with other providers; (E) in areas, developments or buildings where Franchisee
cannot access under reasonable terms and conditions after good faith negotiation, as determined
by Franchisee; and (F) in developments or buildings that Franchisee is unable to provide Cable
Service for technical reasons or which require non-standard facilities which are not available on
a commercially reasonable basis; and (G) in areas where the occupied residential household
density does not meet the density requirements set forth in Section 3.1.2.
3.1.2 Density Requirement: Franchisee shall make Cable Services available to
residential dwelling units in all areas of the Service Area where the average density is equal to or
greater than thirty (30) residential dwelling units per mile, as measured in strand footage from
the nearest technically feasible point on the active FTTP Network trunk or feeder line. Should,
through new construction, an area within the Initial Service Area meet the density requirements
after the time stated for providing Cable Service as set forth in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2
respectively, Franchisee shall provide Cable Service to such area within twelve (12) months of
receiving notice from the City that the density requirements have been met.
3.1.3 Additional Service Areas: Except for the Initial Service Area Franchisee
shall not be required to extend its Cable System or to provide Cable Services to any other areas
within the Franchise Area during the term of this Franchise or any Renewals thereof except as set
forth in this Section 3.1.3. The parties agree that if any land is annexed by the City during the
term of this Agreement, such annexed areas shall become part of the Franchise Area and
Franchisee shall be required to extend Cable Service within a reasonable time to such annexed
area (subject to the exceptions in Section 3.1.1 above), provided that such annexed area: (a) is
contiguous to the City, (b) is within Franchisee’s Title II service territory, and (c) is served by
the video-enabled FTTP Network. If Franchisee intends to serve Additional Service Areas
within the Franchise Area, Franchisee shall notify the City in writing of such Additional Service
Area at least ten (10) days prior to providing Cable Services in such areas.
3.2 Availability of Cable Service: Franchisee shall make Cable Service available to
all residential dwelling units and may make Cable Service available to businesses within the
Service Area in conformance with Section 3.1 and Franchisee shall not discriminate between or
among any individuals in the availability of Cable Service. Franchisee shall not deny access to
Cable Services to any group of potential residential Subscribers because of the income of the
residents of the local area in which the group resides. In the areas in which Franchisee shall
provide Cable Service, Franchisee shall be required to connect, at Franchisee’s expense, other
than a standard installation charge, all residential dwelling units that are within one hundred fifty
(150) feet of trunk or feeder lines not otherwise already served by Franchisee’s FTTP Network.
Franchisee shall be allowed to recover, from a Subscriber that requests such connection, actual
costs incurred for residential dwelling unit connections that exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet
and actual costs incurred to connect any non-residential Subscriber.
3.3 Complimentary Cable Service to Public Buildings: Subject to Section 3.1,
Franchisee shall provide without charge within the Service Area, one service outlet (unless
otherwise specified in Exhibit B) activated for Basic Service to each public school, police and
fire station, public library, government offices, and other buildings used for government
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 10
Packet Page 130 of 426
administration as may be designated by the City, and also required of other cable operators in the
Service Area, as provided in Exhibit B; provided, however, that if it is necessary to extend
Franchisee’s trunk or feeder lines more than one hundred fifty (150) feet solely to provide
service to any such school or public building, the City or other appropriate entity shall have the
option either of paying Franchisee’s direct costs for such extension in excess of one hundred fifty
(150) feet, or of releasing Franchisee from the obligation to provide service to such building.
Furthermore, Franchisee shall be permitted to recover, from any school or other public building
owner entitled to free service, the direct cost of installing, when requested to do so, more than
one outlet or concealed inside wiring, or a service outlet requiring more than one hundred fifty
(150) feet of drop cable; provided, however, that Franchisee shall charge for the provision of
Basic Service to the additional service outlets once installed. Cable Service may not be resold or
otherwise used in contravention of Franchisee’s rights with third parties respecting
programming. Equipment provided by Franchisee, if any, shall be replaced at retail rates if lost,
stolen, or damaged due to the negligence or other wrongful acts of the City.
4. SYSTEM OPERATION
As provided in Section 2.2, the parties recognize that Franchisee’s FTTP Network is
being constructed and will be operated and maintained as an upgrade to and/or extension of its
existing Telecommunications Facilities. The jurisdiction of the City over such
Telecommunications Facilities is restricted by federal and state law, and the City does not and
will not assert jurisdiction over Franchisee’s FTTP Network in contravention of those
limitations.
5. SYSTEM FACILITIES
5.1 Technical Requirement: Franchisee shall operate, maintain, construct and extend
the Cable System so as to provide high quality signals and reliable delivery of Cable Services for
all cable programming services. The Cable System shall meet or exceed any and all applicable
technical performance standards of the FCC, the National Electrical Safety Code, the National
Electrical Code and any other applicable federal law and the laws of the State of Washington to
the extent not in conflict with federal law and regulations.
5.2 System Characteristics: Franchisee’s Cable System shall meet or exceed the
following requirements:
5.2.1 The System shall be designed with an initial digital carrier passband
between fifty (50) and eight hundred sixty (860) MHz.
5.2.2 The System shall be designed, constructed and maintained to be an active
two-way plant for subscriber interaction, if any, required for selection or use of Cable Service.
5.3 Interconnection: The Franchisee shall design its Cable System so that it may be
interconnected with other cable systems in the Franchise Area. Interconnection of systems may
be made by direct cable connection, microwave link, satellite, or other appropriate methods.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 11
Packet Page 131 of 426
5.4 Emergency Alert System: Franchisee shall comply with the Emergency Alert
System (“EAS”) requirements of the FCC and state law in order that emergency messages may
be distributed over the System in video and audio formats as required by state and federal law.
6. EG SERVICES
6.1 Access Channels:
6.1.1 In order to ensure availability of educational and government
programming, Franchisee shall provide, without charge to the City, on the Basic Service Tier one
(1) dedicated Government Access Channel and one (1) shared Educational and Government
Access Channel, and Franchisee shall reserve on its Basic Service Tier for the City’s future use
one (1) additional dedicated Channel for Educational Access and one (1) additional dedicated
Channel for Government Access (the “Reserve Channels”) (collectively, “Access Channels”).
6.1.2 The parties agree that Franchisee shall retain the right to utilize all such
Access Channels, in its sole discretion, during the term of this Franchise until such time that
Franchisee activates the City’s Access Channels pursuant to Section 6.1 and/or if the City ceases
to use the Access Channels during the Term of this Agreement. The City shall comply with
applicable law regarding the use of EG Channels. Franchisee shall only be required to provide
the Reserve Channels so long as the other Cable Operators in the Franchise Area are also
providing similar channels.
6.1.3 Upon the signing of this Agreement, the City hereby notifies Franchisee of
its intent to provide programming to be carried on the Government and Educational Access
Channels; such notification shall constitute authorization to the Franchisee to transmit such
programming within and outside of the City.
6.1.4 The City may activate a Reserve Channel during the Term by providing
the Franchisee with written notice of the need for additional Access Channel capacity at least one
hundred eighty (180) days prior to the date it intends to activate a Reserve Channel,
demonstrated by a programming schedule for EG programming on the existing Government or
shared Educational and Government Access Channels, as applicable, consisting of at least six (6)
hours per day, which programming for purposes of this calculation shall not include repeat
programming generated per day or character-generated programming. Such written notice shall
authorize the Franchisee to transmit the Reserve Channel within and outside of the City.
6.1.5 The Franchisee specifically reserves the right to make or change channel
assignments in its sole discretion and shall provide notice of such changes as set forth in the
Customer Service Standards, Exhibit D, Sections 10.E and 10.G.4. The Access Channels shall
be used for community programming related to Educational and/or Governmental activities. The
City shall have complete control over the content, scheduling, and administration of the Access
Channels and may delegate such functions, or a portion of such functions, to an appropriate
designee upon written notice from the City to Franchisee. The Franchisee shall not exercise any
editorial control over Access Channel programming.
6.1.6 The City shall provide and ensure suitable video and audio signals for the
Access Channels at the Public Safety Building (250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020)
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 12
Packet Page 132 of 426
for the Government Access Channel and at the Edmonds Community College (20000 68th Ave.
West, Lynnwood, WA 98036) for the shared Educational and Government Access Channel; and
subject to written notification pursuant to Section 6.1.4, the City shall provide and ensure
suitable video and audio signals for the Reserve Channels at a single mutually agreeable location
(all together, the “EG Origination Sites”). The Franchisee’s obligations under this Section 6.1,
including its obligation to provide upstream equipment, lines and facilities necessary to transmit
those video and audio signals, shall be subject to the provision by the City, to the extent
applicable and without charge to the Franchisee, of:
(1) access to the EG Channel Origination Site facility;
(2) access to any required EG equipment within the EG Channel
Origination Site facility and suitable required space, environmental conditions, electrical power
supply, access, and pathways within the EG Channel Origination Site facility;
(3) video and audio signals in a mutually agreed upon format suitable
for EG Access Channel programming;
(4) any third-party consent that may be necessary to transmit EG
signals (including, without limitation, any consent that may be required with respect to third-
party facilities, including the facilities of the incumbent cable provider, used to transmit EG
content to the EG Channel Origination Site from auxiliary locations); and
(5) any other cooperation and access to facilities as are reasonably
necessary for the Franchisee to fulfill the obligations stated herein.
To the extent suitable video and audio signals are provided to Franchisee and the foregoing
conditions in Section 6.1 are met, Franchisee shall, within one hundred eighty (180) days of
written notice or provision of suitable video and audio signals, whichever is later, provide,
install, and maintain in good working order the equipment necessary for transmitting the EG
signal to Subscribers.
6.2 EG Grant:
6.2.1 Franchisee shall provide a grant to the City, or its designee (as evidenced
by appropriate notice by the City), to be used in support of the production of local EG
programming (the “EG Grant”). Such grant shall be used by the City for EG access equipment,
including, but not limited to, studio and portable production equipment, editing equipment and
program playback equipment, or for renovation or construction of EG access facilities.
6.2.2 If during the Term of this Franchise, all other Cable Operator(s) in the
Franchise Area begin to provide an EG Grant on a per subscriber per month basis, Franchisee
agrees to match the EG Grant in the amount of up to $0.35 per Subscriber, per month.
Subsequently, such amount can be modified as determined by the City Council no more than
once each year and the EG Grant shall be no greater than $1.00, per Subscriber, per month, and
shall be the same amount required of all other Cable Operators in the Franchise Area.
Franchisee’s obligation under this Section 6.2.2. is contingent upon all other Cable Operators
making the same grant payment on a per Subscriber, per month basis. The City shall give
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 13
Packet Page 133 of 426
Franchisee sixty (60) days prior written notice before changing the amount of the EG Grant
under this Section. The EG Grant payment, shall be delivered to the City concurrent with the
Franchise Fee payment.
6.2.3 The Franchisee shall provide to the City an initial EG Grant in the amount
of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date. Such amount
is competitively equitable to the grant made by the incumbent Cable Operator to the City.
6.2.4 The City shall provide Franchisee with a complete accounting annually of
the distribution of funds granted pursuant to this Section 6.2.
6.3 The City shall require all local producers and users of any of the EG facilities or
Channels to agree in writing to authorize Franchisee to transmit programming consistent with
this Agreement and to defend and hold harmless Franchisee and the City, from and against any
and all liability or other injury, including the reasonable cost of defending claims or litigation,
arising from or in connection with claims for failure to comply with applicable federal laws,
rules, regulations or other requirements of local, state or federal authorities; for claims of libel,
slander, invasion of privacy, or the infringement of common law or statutory copyright; for
unauthorized use of any trademark, trade name or service mark; for breach of contractual or
other obligations owed to third parties by the producer or user; and for any other injury or
damage in law or equity, which result from the use of a EG facility or Channel. The City shall
establish rules and regulations for use of EG facilities, consistent with, and as required by, 47
U.S.C. § 531.
6.4 To the extent permitted by federal law, the Franchisee shall be allowed to recover
the costs of an EG Grant or any other costs arising from the provision of EG services from
Subscribers and to include such costs as a separately billed line item on each Subscriber’s bill.
7. FRANCHISE FEES
7.1 Payment to City: Franchisee shall pay to the City a Franchise fee of five percent
(5%) of annual Gross Revenue (“Franchise Fee”). In accordance with Title VI of the
Communications Act, the twelve-month (12) period applicable under the Franchise for the
computation of the Franchise Fee shall be a calendar year. Such payments shall be made no later
than forty-five (45) days following the end of each calendar quarter. Franchisee shall be allowed
to submit or correct any payments that were inadvertently omitted, and shall be refunded any
payments that were incorrectly submitted, in connection with the quarterly Franchise Fee
remittances within ninety (90) days following the close of the calendar year for which such
payments were applicable.
7.2 Supporting Information: Each Franchise Fee payment shall be accompanied by a
brief report that is verified by a financial manager of Franchisee showing the basis for the
computation, substantially similar to that set forth in Exhibit D. No later than forty-five (45)
days after the end of each calendar year, Franchisee shall furnish to the City an annual summary
of Franchise Fee calculations.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 14
Packet Page 134 of 426
7.3 Limitation on Franchise Fee Actions: The parties agree that the period of
limitation for recovery of any Franchise Fee payable hereunder shall be four (4) years from the
date on which payment by Franchisee is due.
7.4 Interest Charge on Late Payments: Late payments for any (i) Franchise Fees due
pursuant to Section 7, (ii) EG Grant due pursuant to Section 6, (iii) Franchise Grant due pursuant
to Section 14, and (iv) liquidated damages due pursuant to Section 13 shall be subject to the
interest at the then-current rate set forth in RCW 19.52.020, which as of the date of execution of
this Agreement is twelve percent (12%) per annum from the due date to the date that such
payment is made.
7.5 No Release: The City’s acceptance of payment shall not be construed as an
agreement that the amount paid was correct, nor shall acceptance be construed as a release of any
claim which the City may have for additional sums due under provisions of this Section 7.
7.6 No Limitation on Taxing Authority: Nothing in this Franchise shall be construed
to limit any authority of the City to impose any tax, fee, or assessment of general applicability.
Nothing in this Franchise is intended to preclude Franchisee from exercising any right it may
have to challenge the lawfulness of any tax, fee, or assessment imposed by the City or any state
or federal agency or authority, or intended to waive any rights the Franchisee may have under 47
U.S.C. § 542.
7.7 EG Grant and Franchise Grant Not Franchise Fees: Franchisee agrees that the
EG Grant and Franchise Grant set forth in Sections 6 and 14 respectively, shall in no way modify
or otherwise affect Franchisee’s obligation to pay Franchise Fees to the City. Franchisee agrees
that although the sum of Franchise Fees and the EG Grant and Franchise Grant may total more
than five percent (5%) of Franchisee’s Gross Revenues in any twelve-month (12) period, the
additional commitments are not to be offset or otherwise credited in any way against any
Franchise Fee payments under this Franchise.
7.8 Audits:
7.8.1 The parties shall make every effort to informally consult and resolve any
questions or issues regarding Franchise Fee or EG Grant payments and nothing herein shall be
construed to preclude such informal consultations or review of Franchisee’s books. The City
may audit or conduct a Franchise Fee review of Franchisee's books and records no more than
once every three (3) years during the Term, provided that the City shall require all other Cable
Operators in the Franchise Area to be subject to competitively equitable audit requirements in
any renewal or initial granting of such franchises after the Effective Date.
7.8.2 All records reasonably necessary for any such audit shall be made
available by Franchisee to the City within thirty (30) days of the City’s request.
7.8.3 Each party shall bear its own costs of an audit; provided, however, that if
the results of any audit indicate that Franchisee underpaid the Franchise Fees by five percent
(5%) or more, then Franchisee shall pay the reasonable, documented, out-of-pocket costs of the
audit up to Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000).
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 15
Packet Page 135 of 426
7.8.4 If the results of an audit indicate an overpayment of Franchise Fees, the
parties agree that any undisputed overpayment shall be offset against future payments if
applicable, within forty-five (45) days. If the results of an audit indicate an underpayment of
Franchise Fees, the parties agree that any undisputed underpayment shall be paid within forty-
five (45) days along with interest as set forth in Section 7.4.
7.8.5 Any audit shall be conducted by an independent third party. Any entity
employed by the City that performs the audit or Franchise Fee review shall not be permitted to
be compensated on a success based formula, e.g. payment based on an underpayment of fees, if
any.
7.9 Bundled Services: If Cable Services subject to the Franchise Fee required under
this Article 7 are provided to Subscribers in conjunction with Non-Cable Services, the Franchise
Fee shall be applied only to the value of the Cable Services, as reflected on the books and
records of Franchisee in accordance with applicable federal or state laws, rules, and regulations,
or Washington Utilities and Trade Commission regulations, standards or orders. Franchisee shall
not allocate revenue between Cable Services and Non-Cable Services with the purpose of
evading or substantially reducing the Franchisee’s Franchise Fee obligations to the City.
7.10 Alternative Fees: In the event that Franchise Fees are prohibited by any law or
regulation, Franchisee agrees to pay any substitute fee or amount allowed by law up to a
maximum amount of five percent (5%) of Gross Revenues, so long as the substitute fee is
imposed on all other Cable Operators in the Franchise Area and Franchisee is given thirty (30)
days notice of the substitute fee by the City.
8. CUSTOMER SERVICE
Customer Service Requirements are set forth in Exhibit D, which shall be binding unless
amended by written consent of the parties.
9. REPORTS AND RECORDS
9.1 Open Books and Records: Upon reasonable written notice to the Franchisee and
with no less than thirty (30) business days written notice to the Franchisee, the City shall have
the right to inspect Franchisee’s books and records pertaining to Franchisee’s provision of Cable
Service in the Franchise Area at any time during normal business hours (those hours during
which most similar businesses in the community are open to serve customers) and on a
nondisruptive basis, at a mutually agreed upon location in the Franchisee’s Title II territory in
Washington, as are reasonably necessary to ensure compliance with the terms of this Franchise.
Such notice shall specifically reference the section of the Franchise which is under review, so
that Franchisee may organize the necessary books and records for appropriate access by the City.
Franchisee shall not be required to maintain any books and records for Franchise compliance
purposes longer than six (6) years, provided that if, as a result of reviewing Franchisee’s records,
the City identifies specific records and requests that such records be retained beyond the six-year
(6) period, Franchisee shall retain those records for an additional twelve (12) months.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, Franchisee shall not be required to
disclose information that it reasonably deems to be proprietary or confidential in nature, nor
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 16
Packet Page 136 of 426
disclose any of its or an Affiliate’s books and records not relating to the provision of Cable
Service in the Service Area. The City shall treat any information disclosed by Franchisee as
confidential and only disclose it to employees, representatives, and agents thereof that have a
need to know, or in order to enforce the provisions hereof, unless otherwise required by law
whereupon the City will notify Franchisee pursuant to Section 9.2. Franchisee shall not be
required to provide Subscriber information in violation of section 631 of the Communications
Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551.
9.2 Public Disclosure: If, in the course of enforcing this Franchise or for any other
reason, the City believes it must disclose any Franchisee confidential information pursuant to
Washington law, the City shall provide reasonable advance notice of such disclosure so that
Franchisee can take appropriate steps to protect its interests.
9.3 Records Required: Franchisee shall at all times maintain:
9.3.1 Records of all written complaints for a period of three (3) years after
receipt by Franchisee. The term “complaint” as used herein refers to complaints about any
aspect of the Cable System or Franchisee’s cable operations, including, without limitation,
complaints about employee courtesy. Complaints recorded will not be limited to complaints
requiring an employee service call;
9.3.2 Records of outages for a period of three (3) years after occurrence,
indicating date, duration, area, and the number of Subscribers affected, type of outage, and
cause;
9.3.3 Records of service calls for repair and maintenance for a period of three
(3) years after resolution by Franchisee, indicating the date and time service was required, the
date of acknowledgment and date and time service was scheduled (if it was scheduled), and the
date and time service was provided, and (if different) the date and time the problem was
resolved;
9.3.4 Records of installation/reconnection and requests for service extension for
a period of three (3) years after the request was fulfilled by Franchisee, indicating the date of
request, date of acknowledgment, and the date and time service was extended; and
9.3.5 A map showing the area of coverage for the provisioning of Cable
Services and estimated timetable to commence providing Cable Service.
10. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
10.1 Insurance:
10.1.1 Franchisee shall maintain in full force and effect, at its own cost and
expense, during the Franchise Term, the following insurance coverage:
10.1.1.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance in the amount of two
million dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit for property damage and bodily injury. Such
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 17
Packet Page 137 of 426
insurance shall cover the construction, operation and maintenance of the Cable System and the
conduct of Franchisee’s Cable Service business in the City.
10.1.1.2 Automobile Liability Insurance in the amount of two million
dollars ($2,000,000) combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage.
10.1.1.3 Workers’ Compensation Insurance meeting all legal
requirements of the state of Washington.
10.1.1.4 Employers’ Liability Insurance in the following amounts: (A)
Bodily Injury by Accident: $100,000; and (B) Bodily Injury by Disease: $100,000 employee
limit; and (C) Bodily Injury by Disease: $2,000,000 policy limit.
10.1.1.5 Umbrella or excess liability insurance in the amount of three
million dollars ($3,000,000).
10.1.2 The City shall be included as an additional insured under each of the
insurance policies required in this Article 10 except Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s
Liability Insurance. Franchisee shall provide to the City a copy of the blanket additional insured
endorsements for General and Auto liability, or similar documentation demonstrating
compliance. Receipt by an the City of any certificate showing less coverage than required is not
a waiver of Franchisee’s obligations to fulfill the requirements.
10.1.3 Each of the required insurance policies shall be with insurers qualified to
do business in the State of Washington with an A.M. Best Financial Strength rating of A- or
better.
10.1.4 Franchisee shall not cancel any required insurance policy without
obtaining alternative insurance in conformance with this Agreement. In the event that the
insurance company cancels the policy, Franchisee will work diligently to obtain replacement
insurance so there is no gap in coverage.
10.1.5 Franchisee shall deliver to the City Certificates of Insurance showing
evidence of the required coverage within thirty (30) days following the Effective Date of this
Agreement.
10.1.6 The limits required above may be satisfied with a combination of primary
and excess coverage.
10.2 Indemnification:
10.2.1 Franchisee agrees to indemnify, save and hold harmless, and defend the
LFA, its elected officials, officers, agents, boards and employees, from and against any liability,
damages or claims, settlements approved by Franchisee pursuant to Section 10.2.2 or judgments,
arising out of, or resulting from, the Franchisee’s activities pursuant to this Franchise, provided
that the LFA shall give Franchisee written notice of its obligation to indemnify the LFA within
ten (10) days of receipt of a claim or action pursuant to this Section, (or up to thirty (30) days as
long as such notice causes no prejudice to the Franchisee). Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 18
Packet Page 138 of 426
Franchisee shall not indemnify the LFA, for any damages, liability or claims resulting from the
willful misconduct, negligence, or breach of obligation of the LFA, its officers, agents,
employees, attorneys, consultants, or independent contractors, for which the LFA is legally
responsible, or for any activity or function conducted by any Person other than Franchisee in
connection with EG Access or EAS.
10.2.2 With respect to Franchisee’s indemnity obligations set forth in Section
10.2.1, Franchisee shall provide the defense of any claims or actions brought against the City by
selecting counsel of Franchisee’s choice to defend the claim, subject to the consent of the City,
which shall not unreasonably be withheld. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent the City
from cooperating with the Franchisee and participating in the defense of any litigation by its own
counsel at its own cost and expense, provided however, that after consultation with the City,
Franchisee shall have the right to defend, settle or compromise any claim or action arising
hereunder, and Franchisee shall have the authority to decide the appropriateness and the amount
of any such settlement. In the event that the terms of any such proposed settlement includes the
release of the City, and the third party is willing to accept the settlement, but the City does not
consent to the terms of any such settlement or compromise, Franchisee shall not settle the claim
or action but its obligation to indemnify the City shall in no event exceed the amount of such
settlement.
11. TRANSFER OF FRANCHISE
11.1 Transfer of the Franchise means:
11.1.1 Any transaction in which:
11.1.1.1 an ownership or other interest in Franchisee, the Franchise or
the Cable System is transferred, directly or indirectly, from one Person or group of Persons to
another Person or group of Persons, so that Control of Franchisee is transferred; or
11.1.1.2 the rights held by Franchisee under the Franchise are transferred
or assigned to another Person or group of Persons.
11.1.2 However, notwithstanding Sections 11.1.1.1 and 11.11.1.2 above, a
Transfer of the Franchise shall not include transfer of an ownership or other interest in
Franchisee to the parent of Franchisee or to another Affiliate of Franchisee; transfer of an interest
in the Franchise or the rights held by the Franchisee under the Franchise to the parent of
Franchisee or to another Affiliate of Franchisee; any action which is the result of a merger of the
parent of the Franchisee; or any action which is the result of a merger of another Affiliate of the
Franchisee.
11.2 Subject to section 617 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 537, no Transfer
of the Franchise shall occur without the prior written consent of the City, provided that such
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned so long as the transferee
assumes the obligations of the Franchisee hereunder. No such consent shall be required,
however, for a transfer in trust, by mortgage, by other hypothecation, by assignment of any
rights, title, or interest of the Franchisee in the Franchise or Cable System in order to secure
indebtedness, or otherwise for transactions otherwise excluded under Section 11.1.2 above.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 19
Packet Page 139 of 426
12. RENEWAL OF FRANCHISE
12.1 The City and Franchisee agree that any proceedings undertaken by the City that
relate to the renewal of this Franchise shall be governed by and comply with the provisions of
section 626 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 546.
12.2 In addition to the procedures set forth in said section 626 of the Communications
Act, the City shall notify Franchisee of all of its assessments regarding the identity of future
cable-related community needs and interests, as well as the past performance of Franchisee under
the then-current Franchise term. The City further agrees that such assessments shall be provided
to Franchisee promptly so that Franchisee has adequate time to submit a proposal under 47
U.S.C. § 546 and pursue renewal of the Franchise prior to expiration of its term.
12.3 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, Franchisee and the City
agree that at any time during the term of the then current Franchise, while affording the public
appropriate notice and opportunity to comment, the City and Franchisee may agree to undertake
and finalize informal negotiations regarding renewal of the then current Franchise and the City
may grant a renewal thereof.
12.4 Franchisee and the City consider the terms set forth in this Article 12 to be
consistent with the express provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 546.
13. ENFORCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF FRANCHISE
13.1 Security: Within thirty (30) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement,
Franchisee shall provide to the City security for the faithful performance by Franchisee of all
material provisions of this Agreement, provided that the City shall require all other Cable
Operators in the Franchise Area to provide competitively equitable security in any renewal or
initial granting of such franchises after the Effective Date. Franchisee shall maintain the
Security at Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) throughout the term of this Agreement.
The form of the security may, at Franchisee’s option, be a performance bond, letter of credit,
cash deposit, cashier’s check or any other security acceptable to the City (the “Security”).
Nothing in this security provision is intended to impair or alter any Title II security fund rights.
13.1.1 If the Franchisee posts a performance bond, it shall be substantially in the
form of Exhibit E.
13.1.2 In the event the Security provided pursuant to the Agreement is not
renewed, is cancelled, is terminated or is otherwise impaired, Franchisee shall provide new
security pursuant to this Article within sixty (60) days of notice.
13.1.3 Neither cancellation, nor termination nor refusal by surety to extend the
bond, nor inability of Franchisee to file a replacement bond or replacement security for its
obligations, shall constitute a loss to the City recoverable under the bond.
13.2 Liquidated Damages:
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 20
Packet Page 140 of 426
13.2.1 In the event the City determines that Franchisee has breached this
Agreement, after following the procedures in Sections 13.3 and 13.4, the City may assess the
following as liquidated damages, provided that the City shall require all other Cable Operators in
the Franchise Area to be subject to competitively equitable liquidated damages in any renewal or
initial granting of such franchises after the Effective Date:
13.2.1.1 Two hundred fifty dollars ($250) per day for failure to provide
EG Access Channels as set forth herein;
13.2.1.2 One hundred fifty dollars ($150) per day for material breach of
the customer service standards set forth in Exhibit D;
13.2.1.3 One hundred dollars ($100) per day for failure to provide
reports as required by the Franchise; or
13.2.1.4 Up to two hundred fifty dollars ($250) per day for any other
material breaches or defaults of this Agreement.
13.2.2 Franchisee shall pay any liquidated damages assessed by the City within
thirty (30) days after they are assessed. Liquidated damages shall accrue starting on the first date
of the occurrence of the noncompliance. If liquidated damages are not paid within the thirty (30)
day period, the City may proceed against the Security. Total liquidated damages shall not
exceed Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) in any twelve-month (12) period.
13.2.3 Assessment of liquidated damages shall not constitute a waiver by the City
of any other right or remedy it may have under this Franchise or applicable law except as set
forth in this Agreement, including without limitation its right to recover from Franchisee such
additional damages, losses, costs and expenses, as may have been suffered or incurred by the
City by reason of or arising out of such breach of this Franchise. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
if the City elects to assess liquidated damages pursuant to this Section, such election shall
constitute the City’s exclusive remedy for the violation for which the liquidated damages were
assessed for a period of sixty (60) days. Thereafter, the remedies provided for in this Agreement
are cumulative and not exclusive; the exercise of one remedy shall not prevent the exercise of
another remedy, or the exercise of any rights of the City at law or equity, provided that the
cumulative remedies may not be disproportionate to the magnitude and severity of the breach for
which they are imposed.
13.2.4 Subject to Sections 13.3 and 13.4, and subject to the assessment of any
liquidated damages pursuant to Section 13.2, the City may elect to pursue other legal and
equitable remedies at any time during the term of this Franchise.
13.3 Notice of Violation: In the event the City believes that Franchisee has not
complied with the terms of the Franchise, failed to perform any obligation under this Agreement
or has failed to perform in a timely manner, the City shall informally discuss the matter with
Franchisee. If these discussions do not lead to resolution of the problem within twenty (20) days,
the City shall notify Franchisee in writing, stating with reasonable specificity the nature of the
alleged violation (the “Noncompliance Notice”).
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 21
Packet Page 141 of 426
13.4 Franchisee’s Right to Cure or Respond: Franchisee shall have thirty (30) days
from receipt of the Noncompliance Notice to: (i) respond to the City, if Franchisee contests (in
whole or in part) the assertion of noncompliance; (ii) cure such noncompliance; or (iii) in the
event that, by its nature, such noncompliance cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period,
initiate reasonable steps to remedy such noncompliance and notify the City of the steps being
taken and the date by which cure is projected to be completed. Upon cure of any
noncompliance, the City shall provide written confirmation that such cure has been effected.
13.5 Remedies: Subject to applicable federal and state law, in the event the City, after
the procedures set forth in Sections 13.3 and 13.4, determines that Franchisee is in default of any
material provision of this Franchise, the City may take the following actions:
13.5.1 Seek specific performance of any provision, which reasonably lends itself
to such remedy, as an alternative to damages;
13.5.2 Seek liquidated damages as set forth herein;
13.5.3 Commence an action at law for monetary damages or seek other equitable
relief;
13.5.4 In the case of a substantial material default of the Franchise, seek to
revoke the Franchise in accordance with Section 13.6.
13.6 Revocation:
13.6.1 As set forth in this Section 13.6, the City may seek to revoke this
Franchise in the event of a substantial material default of this Franchise. Should the City seek to
revoke this Franchise after following the procedures set forth in Sections 13.3 and 13.4, the City
shall give written notice to Franchisee of such intent to revoke this Franchise. This notice of
intent to revoke is in addition to the Notice of Noncompliance pursuant to Section 13.3. The
notice shall set forth with reasonable specificity the reasons for revocation. The Franchisee shall
have thirty (30) days to object in writing and to state its reasons for such objection. In the event
the City has not received a satisfactory response from Franchisee, it may then seek termination of
the Franchise at a public hearing. The City shall notify the Franchisee in writing of the time and
place of the public hearing at least thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing.
13.6.2 At the revocation hearing, Franchisee shall be provided a fair opportunity
for full participation, including the right to be represented by legal counsel, to introduce relevant
evidence, to compel the testimony of persons as permitted by law, and to question and/or cross
examine witnesses. The revocation hearing shall be a public hearing at which members of the
public may testify under oath. A complete verbatim record shall be made of the revocation
hearing by a court reporter. The costs of such court reporter shall be shared equally by the
parties.
13.6.3 Following the public hearing, Franchisee may submit its proposed written
findings and conclusions within twenty (20) days of the close of the public hearing. Thereafter,
the City shall determine: (i) whether an event of default has occurred; (ii) whether such event of
default should be excused; and (iii) whether such event of default has been cured or will be cured
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 22
Packet Page 142 of 426
by the Franchisee; and (iv) whether to revoke the Franchise based on the information presented,
or, where applicable, grant additional time to the Franchisee to effect any cure. If the City
determines that the Franchise shall be revoked, the City shall promptly provide Franchisee with a
written decision setting forth its reasoning. Franchisee may appeal such determination of the
City to an appropriate court within thirty (30) days of notice of the City’s decision.
13.6.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, take any lawful action which it deems
appropriate to enforce the City’s rights under the Franchise in lieu of revocation of the Franchise.
13.7 Franchisee Termination: Franchisee shall have the right to terminate this
Franchise and all obligations hereunder within ninety (90) days after the third anniversary of the
Service Date of this Franchise, if at the end of such three (3) year period Franchisee does not
then in good faith believe it has achieved a commercially reasonable level of Subscriber
penetration on its Cable System. Franchisee may consider subscriber penetration levels outside
the Franchise Area but within the Puget Sound metropolitan area in this determination. Notice to
terminate under this Section 13.7 shall be given to the City in writing, with such termination to
take effect no sooner than one hundred and twenty (120) days after giving such notice.
Franchisee shall also be required to give its then current Subscribers not less than ninety (90)
days prior written notice of its intent to cease Cable Service operations.
13.8 The City specifically does not by any provision of this Franchise, waive any
immunity or limitation of liability under state or federal law, including but not limited to, section
635 A of the Communications Act.
14. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
14.1 Franchise Grant: Franchisee shall pay the City Ten Thousand Dollars
($10,000.00) (the “Franchise Grant”). The Franchise Grant shall be payable thirty (30) days from
the Effective Date, which may be used for any lawful purpose. The City agrees to require
competitively similar obligations from other Cable Operators upon the future grant or renewal of
a franchise agreement for the provision of Cable Service. To the extent permitted by federal law,
Franchisee shall be allowed to recover this amount from Subscribers and may line-item or
otherwise pass-through this amount to Subscribers. The reference to the line item shall accurately
describe its purpose.
14.2 Equal Employment Opportunity: Franchisee shall comply with all applicable
federal and state laws affording nondiscrimination in employment to all individuals regardless of
their race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin, sexual orientation or physical disability.
14.3 Actions of Parties: In any action by the City or Franchisee that is mandated or
permitted under the terms hereof, such party shall act in a reasonable, expeditious, and timely
manner. Furthermore, in any instance where approval or consent is required under the terms
hereof, such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned.
14.4 Binding Acceptance: This Agreement shall bind and benefit the parties hereto and
their respective successors and assigns, and the promises and obligations herein shall survive the
expiration date hereof.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 23
Packet Page 143 of 426
14.5 Preemption: In the event that federal or state law, rules, or regulations preempt a
provision or limit the enforceability of a provision of this Agreement, the provision shall be read
to be preempted to the extent, and for the time, but only to the extent and for the time, required
by law. In the event such federal or state law, rule or regulation is subsequently repealed,
rescinded, amended or otherwise changed so that the provision hereof that had been preempted is
no longer preempted, such provision shall thereupon return to full force and effect, and shall
thereafter be binding on the parties hereto, without the requirement of further action on the part
of the City or Franchisee.
14.6 Force Majeure: Franchisee shall not be held in default under, or in
noncompliance with, the provisions of the Franchise, nor suffer any enforcement or liquidated
damages relating to noncompliance or default, where such noncompliance or alleged defaults
occurred or were caused by a Force Majeure.
14.7 Good Faith Error: Furthermore, the parties hereby agree that it is not the City’s
intention to subject Franchisee to liquidated damages, forfeitures or revocation of the Franchise
for violations of the Franchise where the violation was a good faith error that resulted in no or
minimal negative impact on Subscribers.
14.8 Notices: Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, notices required under the
Franchise shall be deemed effective three (3) days after having been deposited by first class,
postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested or one (1) day after having
been deposited with any nationally recognized overnight courier for next day delivery, and
addressed to the addressees below. Each party may change its designee by providing written
notice to the other party.
14.8.1 Notices to Franchisee shall be mailed to:
Verizon Northwest Inc.
Attn: Tim McCallion, President
112 Lakeview Canyon Road, CA501GA
Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
with a copy to:
Mr. Jack H. White
Senior Vice President & General Counsel - Verizon Telecom
One Verizon Way
Room VC43E010
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920-1097
Notices to the City shall be mailed to:
City of Edmonds
Attn: Mayor
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 24
Packet Page 144 of 426
14.9 Entire Agreement: This Franchise and the Exhibits hereto constitute the entire
agreement between Franchisee and the City, and supersede all prior or contemporaneous
agreements, representations or understandings (whether written or oral) of the parties regarding
the subject matter hereof. Any ordinances or parts of ordinances relating to cable service that
conflict with the provisions of this Agreement are superseded by this Agreement.
14.10 Amendments: Amendments to this Franchise shall be mutually agreed to in
writing by the parties. No amendment will take effect if it will impair the security set forth in
Section 13, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
14.11 Captions: The captions and headings of articles and sections throughout this
Agreement are intended solely to facilitate reading and reference to the sections and provisions
of this Agreement. Such captions shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement.
14.12 Severability: If any section, sentence, paragraph, term, or provision hereof is
determined to be illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional, by any court of competent jurisdiction or by
any state or federal regulatory authority having jurisdiction thereof, such determination shall
have no effect on the validity of any other section, sentence, paragraph, term or provision hereof,
all of which will remain in full force and effect for the term of the Franchise.
14.13 Recitals: The recitals set forth in this Agreement are incorporated into the body
of this Agreement as if they had been originally set forth herein.
14.14 FTTP Network Transfer Prohibition: Under no circumstance including, without
limitation, upon expiration, revocation, termination, denial of renewal of the Franchise or any
other action to forbid or disallow Franchisee from providing Cable Services, shall Franchisee or
its assignees be required to sell any right, title, interest, use or control of any portion of
Franchisee’s FTTP Network including, without limitation, the Cable System and any capacity
used for Cable Service or otherwise, to the City or any third party. Franchisee shall not be
required to remove the FTTP Network or to relocate the FTTP Network or any portion thereof as
a result of revocation, expiration, termination, denial of renewal or any other action to forbid or
disallow Franchisee from providing Cable Services.
14.15 No Joint Venture: Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or
principal-agent relationship between the parties, and neither party is authorized to nor shall either
party act toward third persons or the public in any manner that would indicate any such
relationship with the other.
14.16 Independent Review: The City and Franchisee each acknowledge that they have
received independent legal advice in entering into this Agreement. In the event that a dispute
arises over the meaning or application of any term(s) of this Agreement, such term(s) shall not be
construed by the reference to any doctrine calling for ambiguities to be construed against the
drafter of the Agreement.
14.17 Venue: The venue for any dispute related to this Franchise shall be in the United
States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle, provided it has subject
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 25
Packet Page 145 of 426
matter jurisdiction; if no jurisdiction exists, then venue shall be in the Superior Court for King
County.
14.18 Attorneys’ Fees: If any action or suit arises between Franchisee and the City for
breach of this Franchise, the prevailing party, either the City or Franchisee, as the case may be,
shall be entitled to recover all of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses in connection
therewith along with such other relief as the court deems proper.
14.19 Acceptance: By signing this Agreement, Franchisee accepts and agrees to abide
by the Franchise and, to the extent consistent with the Franchise, the terms and conditions of
Edmonds Municipal Code Chapter 4.68. Franchisee will timely provide to the City the security
specified in Section 13.1 and the insurance certificates specified in Section 10.1.
14.20 Singular and Plural: Except where the context indicates otherwise, words used
herein, regardless of the number specifically used, shall be deemed and construed to include any
other number, singular or plural as is reasonable in the context.
SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 26
Packet Page 146 of 426
AGREED TO THIS _____ DAY OF _____________, 2008.
CITY OF EDMONDS
By: _______________________________
[Name, Title]
Verizon Northwest Inc.
By: _______________________________
Tim McCallion, President
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Initial Service Area
Exhibit B: Municipal Locations and Schools to be Provided Free Cable Service
Exhibit C: Remittance Form
Exhibit D: Customer Service Standards
Exhibit E: Performance Bond
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 27
Packet Page 147 of 426
EXHIBIT A
INITIAL SERVICE AREA
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 28
Packet Page 148 of 426
EXHIBIT B
MUNICIPAL LOCATIONS AND SCHOOLS TO BE PROVIDED
FREE CABLE SERVICE
Existing Buildings:
City Hall-Mayor
121 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
City Administration
121 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
City Meeting Room
121 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Fire Department
121 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Finance Department
121 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
City Park Maintenance Building
600 3rd Ave, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds Historical Museum
118 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds Library
650 Main Street, Edmonds, WA
Fire Station #16
8429 196th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Fire Station #17
275 6th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Fire Station #20
23009 88th Avenue W, Edmonds, WA
Frances Anderson Center
700 Main Street, Edmonds, WA
Meadowdale Clubhouse
6801 Meadowdale Road, Edmonds WA
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 29
Packet Page 149 of 426
Old Public Works
200 Dayton Street, Edmonds, WA
Handicapped Access Area – City Council Chamber
250 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
City Council Chambers
250 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Police Department
250 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Organization/EG Origination Site
250 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Public Works
7110 210th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Senior Center
220 Railroad Avenue, Edmonds, WA
Wade James Theatre
950 Main Street, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds Performing Arts Center
410 Fourth Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Yost Pool
9535 Bowdoin Way, Edmonds, WA
Scriber Lake High School
23200 100th Avenue W, Edmonds, WA
Sherwood Elementary School
22901 106th Avenue W, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds Elementary School
1215 Olympic Avenue, Edmonds, WA
Chase Lake Community School
21603 84th Avenue W, Edmonds, WA
Boys & Girls Club
310 6th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 30
Packet Page 150 of 426
Edmonds-Woodway High School
7600 212th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Seaview Elementary School
8426 188th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Maplewood K-8
8500 200th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Woodway Elementary School
9521 240th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Westgate Elementary
9601 220th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Olympic View Water & Sewer District
23725 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA
Port of Edmonds Administration Offices
336 Admiral Way, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
820 15th SW, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds School District
15619 56th Avenue W, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds School District #15 (Meadowdale)
6505 168th Street SW, Edmonds, WA
Edmonds School District #15
6th Avenue N, Edmonds, WA
Madrona School
9300 236th Street, Edmonds, WA
In the event that an existing building listed above is demolished and rebuilt in the same or
different location in the Service Area, Franchisee will provide, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in Section 3.3, one service outlet activated for Basic Service so long as all
other Cable Operators in the Franchise Area provide service at such location.
Future Buildings:
Franchisee will provide, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 3.3 of this
Franchise, one service outlet active for Basic Service at up to five (5) future public buildings in
the Service Area so long as all other Cable Operators in the Franchise Area provide service to at
least the same number of future locations.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 31
Packet Page 151 of 426
EXHIBIT C
REMITTANCE FORM
Franchise Fee Schedule/Report (Quarter and Year)
City of XXXX
Verizon - fGTE
Washington
Franchise Fee Rate: 5.00%
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Quarter Total
Monthly Recurring Cable
Service Charges (e.g.
Basic, Enhanced Basic,
Premium and Equipment
Rental)
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Usage Based Charges
(e.g. PayPer View,
Installation)
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Advertising $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Home Shopping $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Late Payment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Other Misc. (Leased
Access & Other Misc.)
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Franchise Fee Billed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
PEG Fee Billed $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Less:
Bad Debt
Total Receipts Subject to
Franchise Fee Calculation
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Franchise Fee Due $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Verizon Northwest Inc. is hereby requesting that this information be treated as confidential and proprietary commercial trade
secret information and financial statements and not disclosed in accordance with section XXXX and the Cable Television
Franchise Agreement granted to Verizon Northwest Inc. This information is not otherwise readily ascertainable or publicly
available by proper means by other persons from another source in the same configuration as provided herein, would cause
substantial harm to competitive position of Verizon in the highly competitive video marketplace if disclosed, is intended to be
proprietary confidential business information and is treated by Verizon as such.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 32
Packet Page 152 of 426
EXHIBIT D
CUSTOMER SERVICE STANDARDS
These standards shall, starting six (6) months after the Service Date, apply to Franchisee to the
extent it is providing Cable Services over the Cable System in the Franchise area. For the first
six (6) months after the Service Date, Franchisee shall use best efforts to comply with the
Customer Service Standards provided herein; it being agreed, however, that the City will not
impose liquidated damages during this first six (6) month period if Franchisee using best efforts
fails to meet the Customer Service Standards.
SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS
A. Normal Operating Conditions: Those service conditions which are within the
control of Franchisee, as defined under 47 C.F.R. § 76.309(c)(4)(ii). Those conditions which are
not within the control of Franchisee include, but are not limited to, natural disasters, civil
disturbances, power outages, telephone network outages that are not within the control of the
Franchisee, and severe or unusual weather conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily
within the control of Franchisee include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay-per-view
events, rate increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or rebuild of
the Cable System.
B. Respond: The start of Franchisee’s investigation of a Service Interruption by
receiving a Subscriber call, and opening a trouble ticket, and begin working, if required.
C. Service Call: The action taken by Franchisee to correct a Service Interruption the
effect of which is limited to an individual Subscriber.
D. Service Interruption: The loss of picture or sound on one or more cable channels.
E. Significant Outage: A significant outage of the Cable Service shall mean any
Service Interruption lasting at least four (4) continuous hours that affects at least ten percent
(10%) of the Subscribers in the Service Area.
F. Standard Installation: Installations where the Subscriber is within one hundred
fifty (150) feet of trunk or feeder lines.
SECTION 2: TELEPHONE AVAILABILITY
A. Franchisee shall maintain a toll-free number to receive all calls and inquiries from
Subscribers in the Franchise Area and/or residents regarding Cable Service. Franchisee
representatives trained and qualified to answer questions related to Cable Service in the Service
Area must be available to receive reports of Service Interruptions twenty-four (24) hours a day,
seven (7) days a week, all other inquiries at least forty-five (45) hours per week. Franchisee
representatives shall identify themselves by name when answering this number.
B. Franchisee’s telephone numbers shall be listed, with appropriate description (e.g.
administration, customer service, billing, repair, etc.), in the directory published by the local
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 33
Packet Page 153 of 426
telephone company or companies serving the Service Area, beginning with the next publication
cycle after acceptance of this Franchise by Franchisee.
C. Franchisee may use an Automated Response Unit (“ARU”) or a Voice Response
Unit (“VRU”) to distribute calls. If a foreign language routing option is provided, and the
Subscriber does not enter an option, the menu will default to the first tier menu of English
options.
After the first tier menu (not including a foreign language rollout) has run through three
times, if customers do not select any option, the ARU or VRU will forward the call to a queue
for a live representative. Franchisee may reasonably substitute this requirement with another
method of handling calls from customers who do not have touch-tone telephones.
D. Under Normal Operating Conditions, calls received by the Franchisee shall be
answered within thirty (30) seconds. The Franchisee shall meet this standard for ninety percent
(90%) of the calls it receives at call centers receiving calls from Subscribers, as measured on a
cumulative quarterly calendar basis. Measurement of this standard shall include all calls
received by the Franchisee at all call centers receiving calls from Subscribers, whether they are
answered by a live representative, by an automated attendant, or abandoned after thirty (30)
seconds of call waiting. If the call needs to be transferred, transfer time shall not exceed thirty
(30) seconds.
E. Under Normal Operating Conditions, callers to the Franchisee shall receive a busy
signal no more than three (3%) percent of the time during any calendar quarter.
F. Upon request from the City, but in no event more than once a quarter, forty-five
(45) days following the end of each quarter, the Franchisee shall report to the City the following
for all call centers receiving calls from Subscribers except for temporary telephone numbers set
up for national promotions:
(1) Percentage of calls answered within thirty (30) seconds as set forth in
Section 2.D; and
(2) Percentage of time customers received a busy signal when calling the
Franchisee’s service center as set forth in Section 2.E.
Subject to consumer privacy requirements, underlying activity will be made available to
the City for review upon reasonable request.
G. At the Franchisee’s option, the measurements and reporting above may be
changed from calendar quarters to billing or accounting quarters one time during the term of this
Agreement. Franchisee shall notify the City of such a change not less than thirty (30) days in
advance.
SECTION 3: INSTALLATIONS AND SERVICE APPOINTMENTS
A. All installations will be in accordance with FCC rules, including but not limited
to, appropriate grounding, connection of equipment to ensure reception of Cable Service, and the
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 34
Packet Page 154 of 426
provision of required consumer information and literature to adequately inform the Subscriber in
the utilization of Franchisee-supplied equipment and Cable Service.
B. The Standard Installation shall be performed within seven (7) business days after
an order is placed if the Optical Network Terminal (“ONT”) is already installed on the
customer’s premises. The Standard Installation shall be performed within fourteen (14) business
days where there is no ONT at the time of service order. Franchisee shall meet this standard for
ninety-five percent (95%) of the Standard Installations it performs, as measured on a calendar
quarter basis, excluding those requested by the customer outside of these time periods.
C. The Franchisee shall provide the City with a report upon request from the City,
but in no event more than once a quarter, noting the percentage of Standard Installations
completed within the time periods provided in Section 3.B. Subject to consumer privacy
requirements, underlying activity will be made available to the City for review upon reasonable
request.
D. At Franchisee’s option, the measurements and reporting above may be changed
from calendar quarters to billing or accounting quarters one time during the term of this
Agreement. Franchisee shall notify the City of such a change not less than thirty (30) days in
advance.
E. Franchisee will offer Subscribers “appointment window” alternatives for arrival
to perform installations, Service Calls and other activities of a maximum four (4) hours
scheduled time block during appropriate daylight available hours, usually beginning at 8:00 AM
unless it is deemed appropriate to begin earlier by location exception. At Franchisee’s
discretion, Franchisee may offer Subscribers appointment arrival times other than these four (4)
hour time blocks, if agreeable to the Subscriber. These hour restrictions do not apply to
weekends.
(1) Franchisee may not cancel an appointment window with a customer after
the close of business on the business day prior to the scheduled appointment.
(2) If Franchisee's representative is running late for an appointment with a
customer and will not be able to keep the appointment as scheduled, the customer will be
contacted. The appointment will be rescheduled, as necessary, at a time which is convenient for
the customer.
F. Franchisee must provide for the pick up or drop off of equipment free of charge in
one of the following manners: (i) by having a Franchisee representative going to the Subscriber’s
residence, (ii) by using a mailer, or (iii) by establishing a local business office within the
Franchise Area. If requested by a mobility-limited customer, the Franchisee shall arrange for
pickup and/or replacement of converters or other Franchisee equipment at Subscriber’s address
or by a satisfactory equivalent.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 35
Packet Page 155 of 426
SECTION 4: SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS AND OUTAGES
A. Franchisee shall promptly notify the City of any Significant Outage of the Cable
Service.
B. Franchisee shall exercise commercially reasonable efforts to limit any Significant
Outage for the purpose of maintaining, repairing, or constructing the Cable System. Except in an
emergency or other situation necessitating a more expedited or alternative notification procedure,
Franchisee may schedule a Significant Outage for a period of more than four (4) hours during
any twenty-four (24) hour period only after the City and each affected Subscriber in the Service
Area have been given fifteen (15) days prior notice of the proposed Significant Outage.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Franchisee may perform modifications, repairs and upgrades to
the System between 12:01 a.m. and 6 a.m. which may interrupt service, and this Section’s notice
obligations respecting such possible interruptions will be satisfied by notice provided to
Subscribers upon installation and in the annual Subscriber notice.
C. Franchisee representatives who are capable of responding to Service Interruptions
must be available to Respond twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week.
D. Under Normal Operating Conditions, Franchisee must Respond to a call from a
Subscriber regarding a Service Interruption or other service problems within the following time
frames:
(1) Within twenty-four (24) hours, including weekends, of receiving
Subscriber calls about Service Interruptions in the Service Area.
(2) Franchisee must begin actions to correct all other Cable Service problems
the next business day after notification by the Subscriber or the City of a Cable Service problem.
E. Under Normal Operating Conditions, Franchisee shall complete Service
Calls within seventy-two (72) hours of the time Franchisee commences to Respond to the
Service Interruption, not including weekends and situations where the Subscriber is not
reasonably available for a Service Call to correct the Service Interruption within the seventy-two
(72) hour period.
F. Franchisee shall meet the standard in Section E of this Section for ninety percent
(90%) of the Service Calls it completes, as measured on a quarterly basis.
G. Franchisee shall provide the City with a report upon request from the City, but in
no event more than once a quarter, forty-five (45) days following the end of each calendar
quarter, noting the percentage of Service Calls completed within the seventy-two (72) hour
period not including Service Calls where the Subscriber was reasonably unavailable for a Service
Call within the seventy-two (72) hour period as set forth in this Section. Subject to consumer
privacy requirements, underlying activity will be made available to the City for review upon
reasonable request. At the Franchisee’s option, the above measurements and reporting may be
changed from calendar quarters to billing or accounting quarters one time during the term of this
Agreement. Franchisee shall notify the City of such a change at least thirty (30) days in advance
of any implementation.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 36
Packet Page 156 of 426
H. Under Normal Operating Conditions, Franchisee shall provide a credit upon
Subscriber request when all Channels received by that Subscriber are out of service for a period
of four (4) consecutive hours or more. The credit shall equal, at a minimum, a proportionate
amount of the affected Subscriber(s) current monthly bill. In order to qualify for the credit, the
Subscriber must promptly report the problem and allow Franchisee to verify the problem if
requested by Franchisee. If Subscriber availability is required for repair, a credit will not be
provided for such time, if any, that the Subscriber is not reasonably available.
I. Under Normal Operating Conditions, if a Significant Outage affects all Video
Programming Cable Services for more than twenty-four (24) consecutive hours, Franchisee shall
issue an automatic credit to the affected Subscribers in the amount equal to their monthly
recurring charges for the proportionate time the Cable Service was out, or a credit to the affected
Subscribers in the amount equal to the charge for the basic plus enhanced basic level of service
for the proportionate time the Cable Service was out, whichever is technically feasible or, if both
are technically feasible, as determined by Franchisee provided such determination is non-
discriminatory. Such credit shall be reflected on Subscriber billing statements within the next
available billing cycle following the outage.
J. With respect to service issues concerning Cable Services provided to the City
facilities, Franchisee shall Respond to all inquiries from the City within four (4) hours and shall
commence necessary repairs within twenty-four (24) hours under Normal Operating Conditions
and shall diligently pursue to completion. If such repairs cannot be completed within twenty-
four (24) hours, Franchisee shall notify the City in writing as to the reason(s) for the delay and
provide an estimated time of repair.
SECTION 5: CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS REFERRED BY THE CITY
Under Normal Operating Conditions, Franchisee shall begin investigating Subscriber
complaints referred by the City within seventy-two (72) hours. Franchisee shall notify the City
of those matters that necessitate an excess of five (5) business days to resolve, but Franchisee
must make all necessary efforts to resolve those complaints within ten (10) business days of the
initial complaint. The City may require Franchisee to provide reasonable documentation to
substantiate the request for additional time to resolve the problem. Franchisee shall inform the
City in writing, which may be by an electronic mail message, of how and when referred
complaints have been resolved within a reasonable time after resolution. For purposes of this
Section, “resolve” means that Franchisee shall perform those actions, which, in the normal
course of business, are necessary to (a) investigate the Customer’s complaint; (b) advise the
Customer of the results of that investigation; and (c) implement and complete steps to bring
resolution to the matter in question.
SECTION 6: BILLING
A. Subscriber bills must be itemized to describe Cable Services purchased by
Subscribers and related equipment charges. Bills will comply with applicable federal and state
laws, and shall clearly delineate activity during the billing period, including optional charges,
rebates, credits, and aggregate late charges. Franchisee shall, without limitation as to additional
line items, be allowed to itemize as separate line items, Franchise fees, taxes and/or other
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 37
Packet Page 157 of 426
governmental-imposed fees. Franchisee shall maintain records of the date and place of mailing
of bills.
B. Every Subscriber with a current account balance sending payment directly to
Franchisee shall be given at least twenty (20) days from the date statements are mailed to the
Subscriber until the payment due date.
C. A specific due date shall be listed on the bill of every Subscriber whose account is
current. Delinquent accounts may receive a bill which lists the due date as upon receipt;
however, the current portion of that bill shall not be considered past due except in accordance
with Section 6.B. above.
D. Any Subscriber who, in good faith, disputes all or part of any bill shall have the
option of withholding the disputed amount without disconnect or late fee being assessed until the
dispute is resolved, provided that:
(1) The Subscriber pays all undisputed charges;
(2) The Subscriber provides notification of the dispute to Franchisee within
five (5) days prior to the due date; and
(3) The Subscriber cooperates in determining the accuracy and/or
appropriateness of the charges in dispute.
(4) It shall be within Franchisee's sole discretion to determine when the
dispute has been resolved.
E. Under Normal Operating Conditions, Franchisee shall initiate investigation and
resolution of all billing complaints received from Subscribers within five (5) business days of
receipt of the complaint. Final resolution shall not be unreasonably delayed.
F. Franchisee shall provide a telephone number and address clearly and prominently
on the bill for Subscribers to contact Franchisee.
G. Franchisee shall forward a copy of any rate-related or customer service-related
billing inserts or other mailings related to Cable Service, but not promotional materials, sent to
Subscribers, to the City.
H. Franchisee shall provide all Subscribers with the option of paying for Cable
Service by check or an automatic payment option where the amount of the bill is automatically
deducted from a checking account designated by the Subscriber. Franchisee may in the future, at
its discretion, permit payment by using a major credit card on a preauthorized basis. Based on
credit history, at the option of Franchisee, the payment alternative may be limited.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 38
Packet Page 158 of 426
SECTION 7: DEPOSITS, REFUNDS AND CREDITS
A. Franchisee may require refundable deposits from Subscribers 1) with a poor credit
or poor payment history, 2) who refuse to provide credit history information to Franchisee, or 3)
who rent Subscriber equipment from Franchisee, so long as such deposits are applied on a non-
discriminatory basis. The deposit Franchisee may charge Subscribers with poor credit or poor
payment history or who refuse to provide credit information may not exceed an amount equal to
an average Subscriber's monthly charge multiplied by six (6). The maximum deposit Franchisee
may charge for Subscriber equipment is the cost of the equipment which Franchisee would need
to purchase to replace the equipment rented to the Subscriber.
B. Franchisee shall refund or credit the Subscriber for the amount of the deposit
collected for equipment, which is unrelated to poor credit or poor payment history, after one year
and provided the Subscriber has demonstrated good payment history during this period.
Franchisee shall pay interest on deposits if required by law.
C. Under Normal Operating Conditions, refund checks will be issued within the next
available billing cycle following the resolution of the event giving rise to the refund, (e.g.
equipment return and final bill payment).
D. Credits for Cable Service will be issued no later than the Subscriber's next
available billing cycle, following the determination that a credit is warranted, and the credit is
approved and processed. Such approval and processing shall not be unreasonably delayed.
E. Bills shall be considered paid when appropriate payment is received by
Franchisee or its authorized agent. Appropriate time considerations shall be included in
Franchisee's collection procedures to assure that payments due have been received before late
notices or termination notices are sent.
SECTION 8: RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
A. Franchisee shall not, except to the extent expressly permitted by law, impose any
fee or charge for Service Calls to a Subscriber's premises to perform any repair or maintenance
work related to Franchisee equipment necessary to receive Cable Service, except where such
problem is caused by a negligent or wrongful act of the Subscriber (including, but not limited to
a situation in which the Subscriber reconnects Franchisee equipment incorrectly) or by the
failure of the Subscriber to take reasonable precautions to protect Franchisee's equipment (for
example, a dog chew).
B. Franchisee shall provide reasonable notice to Subscribers of the possible
assessment of a late fee on bills or by separate notice.
C. All of Franchisee’s rates and charges shall comply with applicable federal and
state law. Franchisee shall maintain a complete current schedule of rates and charges for Cable
Services on file with the City throughout the term of this Franchise.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 39
Packet Page 159 of 426
SECTION 9: DISCONNECTION /DENIAL OF SERVICE
A. Franchisee shall not terminate Cable Service for nonpayment of a delinquent
account unless Franchisee mails a notice of the delinquency and impending termination prior to
the proposed final termination. The notice shall be mailed to the Subscriber to whom the Cable
Service is billed. The notice of delinquency and impending termination may be part of a billing
statement.
B. Cable Service terminated in error must be restored without charge within twenty-
four (24) hours of notice. If a Subscriber was billed for the period during which Cable Service
was terminated in error, a credit shall be issued to the Subscriber if the Service Interruption was
reported by the Subscriber.
C. Nothing in these standards shall limit the right of Franchisee to deny Cable
Service for non-payment of previously provided Cable Services, refusal to pay any required
deposit, theft of Cable Service, damage to Franchisee's equipment, abusive and/or threatening
behavior toward Franchisee's employees or representatives, or refusal to provide credit history
information or refusal to allow Franchisee to validate the identity, credit history and credit
worthiness via an external credit agency.
D. Charges for cable service will be discontinued at the time of the requested
termination of service by the Subscriber, except equipment charges may by applied until
equipment has been returned. No period of notice prior to requested termination of service can
be required of Subscribers by Franchisee. No charge shall be imposed upon the Subscriber for or
related to total disconnection of Cable Service or for any Cable Service delivered after the
effective date of the disconnect request, unless there is a delay in returning Franchisee equipment
or early termination charges apply pursuant to the Subscriber’s service contract. If the
Subscriber fails to specify an effective date for disconnection, the Subscriber shall not be
responsible for Cable Services received after the day following the date the disconnect request is
received by Franchisee. For purposes of this Section, the term “disconnect” shall include
Subscribers who elect to cease receiving Cable Service from Franchisee.
SECTION 10: COMMUNICATIONS WITH SUBSCRIBERS
A. Each employee of the Franchisee who routinely comes into contact with members
of the public at their places of residence must wear a picture identification card clearly indicating
his or her employment with the Franchisee. The photograph on the identification card shall
prominently show the employee’s name and/or identification number. Such employee shall
prominently display such identification card and shall show it to all such members of the public.
Each employee of any contractor or subcontractor of the Franchisee who routinely comes into
contact with members of the public at their places of residence must wear a picture identification
card clearly indicating his or her name, the name of such contractor or subcontractor and the
name of the Franchisee.
B. All contact with a Subscriber or potential Subscriber by a Person representing
Franchisee shall be conducted in a courteous manner.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 40
Packet Page 160 of 426
C. Franchisee shall send annual notices to all Subscribers informing them that any
complaints or inquiries not satisfactorily handled by Franchisee may be referred to the City. A
copy of the annual notice required under this Section 10.C will be given to the City at least
fifteen (15) days prior to distribution to Subscribers.
D. All notices identified in this Section shall be by either:
(1) A separate document included with a billing statement or included on the
portion of the monthly bill that is to be retained by the Subscriber; or
(2) A separate electronic notification.
E. Franchisee shall provide reasonable notice to Subscribers and the City of any
pricing changes or additional changes (excluding sales discounts, new products or offers) and,
subject to the forgoing, any changes in Cable Services, including channel line-ups. Such notice
must be given to Subscribers a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance of such changes if within
the control of Franchisee. Franchisee shall provide a copy of the notice to the City including
how and where the notice was given to Subscribers.
F. Upon request by any Subscriber, Franchisee shall make available a parental
control or lockout device to enable a Subscriber to control access to both the audio and video
portions of any or all Channels. Franchisee shall inform its Subscribers of the availability of the
lockout device at the time of their initial subscription and periodically thereafter.
G. Franchisee shall provide information to all Subscribers about each of the
following items at the time of installation of Cable Services, annually to all Subscribers, at any
time upon request, and, subject to Section 10.E., at least thirty (30) days prior to making
significant changes in the information required by this Section if within the control of
Franchisee:
(1) Products and Cable Service offered;
(2) Prices and options for Cable Services and condition of subscription to
Cable Services. Prices shall include those for Cable Service options, equipment rentals, program
guides, installation, downgrades, late fees and other fees charged by Franchisee related to Cable
Service;
(3) Installation and maintenance policies including, when applicable,
information regarding the Subscriber’s in-home wiring rights during the period Cable Service is
being provided;
(4) Channel positions of Cable Services offered on the Cable System;
(5) Complaint procedures, including the name, address, and telephone number
of the City, but with a notice advising the Subscriber to initially contact Franchisee about all
complaints and questions;
(6) Procedures for requesting Cable Service credit;
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 41
Packet Page 161 of 426
(7) The availability of a parental control device;
(8) Franchisee practices and procedures for protecting against invasion of
privacy; and
(9) The address and telephone number of Franchisee’s office to which
complaints may be reported.
A copy of notices required in this Section 10.G. will be given to the City at least fifteen (15) days
prior to distribution to Subscribers if the reason for notice is due to a change that is within the
control of Franchisee and as soon as possible if not within the control of Franchisee.
H. Notices of changes in rates shall indicate the Cable Service new rates and old
rates, if applicable.
I. Notices of changes of Cable Services and/or Channel locations shall include a
description of the new Cable Service, the specific channel location, and the hours of operation of
the Cable Service if the Cable Service is only offered on a part-time basis. In addition, should
the Channel location, hours of operation, or existence of other Cable Services be affected by the
introduction of a new Cable Service, such information must be included in the notice.
J. Every notice of termination of Cable Service shall include the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the Subscriber whose account is delinquent;
(2) The amount of the delinquency for all services billed;
(3) The date by which payment is required in order to avoid termination of
Cable Service; and
(4) The telephone number for Franchisee where the Subscriber can receive
additional information about their account and discuss the pending termination.
K. Franchisee will comply with privacy rights of Subscribers in accordance with
applicable federal and state law, including 47 U.S.C. §551.
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 42
Packet Page 162 of 426
EXHIBIT E
PERFORMANCE BOND
Bond No. __________
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That (name & address) (hereinafter called the
Principal), and (name and address) (hereinafter called the Surety), a corporation duly organized
under the laws of the State of (state), are held and firmly bound unto (name & address)
(hereinafter called the Obligee), in the full and just sum of _____________ Dollars
($__________), the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the said Principal and
Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, executors, and assigns, jointly and severally,
firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal and Obligee have entered into a Franchise Agreement dated________
which is hereby referred to and made a part hereof.
WHEREAS, said Principal is required to perform certain obligations under said Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Obligee has agreed to accept this bond as security against default by Principal
of performance of its obligations under said Agreement during the time period this bond is in
effect.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if
the Principal shall perform its obligations under said Agreement, then this obligation shall be
void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect, unless otherwise terminated, cancelled or
expired as hereinafter provided.
PROVIDED HOWEVER, that this bond is executed subject to the following express provisions
and conditions:
In the event of default by the Principal, Obligee shall deliver to Surety a written statement of the
details of such default within 30 days after the Obligee shall learn of the same, such notice to be
delivered by certified mail to address of said Surety as stated herein.
This Bond shall be effective ____________, 20___, and shall remain in full force and effect
thereafter for a period of one year and will automatically extend for additional one year periods
from the expiry date hereof, or any future expiration date, unless the Surety provides to the
Obligee not less than sixty (60) days advance written notice of its intent not to renew this Bond
or unless the Bond is earlier canceled pursuant to the following. This Bond may be canceled at
any time upon sixty (60) days advance written notice from the Surety to the Obligee.
Bond No. __________
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 43
Packet Page 163 of 426
Neither cancellation, termination nor refusal by Surety to extend this bond, nor inability of
Principal to file a replacement bond or replacement security for its obligations under said
Agreement, shall constitute a loss to the Obligee recoverable under this bond.
No claim, action, suit or proceeding shall be instituted against this bond unless same be brought
or instituted and process served within one year after termination or cancellation of this bond.
No right of action shall accrue on this bond for the use of any person, corporation or entity other
than the Obligee named herein or the heirs, executors, administrators or successors of the
Obligee.
The aggregate liability of the surety is limited to the penal sum stated herein regardless of the
number of years this bond remains in force or the amount or number of claims brought against
this bond.
This bond is and shall be construed to be strictly one of suretyship only. If any conflict or
inconsistency exists between the Surety’s obligations as described in this bond and as may be
described in any underlying agreement, permit, document or contract to which this bond is
related, then the terms of this bond shall supersede and prevail in all respects.
This bond shall not bind the Surety unless it is accepted by the Obligee by signing below.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bounded Principal and Surety have hereunto signed and
sealed this bond effective this _____ day of _______, 2008.
Principal Surety
By: ___________________________ By: ___________________________________
, Attorney-in-Fact
Accepted by Obligee: ___________________________________
(Signature & date above - Print Name, Title below)
Seattle-3435598.2 0010932-00119 44
Packet Page 164 of 426
AM-1677 5.
Closed Record Appeal: Subdivide Arbor Court Townhomes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Michael Clugston Time:60 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Closed Record Review: Appeal of the Hearing Examiner decision to deny the request by
Steve Smith Development LLC, represented by Jean Morgan of Morgan Design Group, to
subdivide Arbor Court, a 1.27 acre parcel developed with 35 townhomes, into 35 fee-simple
townhouse parcels. The site is zoned Multiple Family Residential (RM-1.5) and is located at
23800 – 23824 Edmonds Way. (File Nos. P-08-16 and APL-08-4)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council to consider the appeal and either:
1. Affirm, modify or reverse the Hearing Examiner's decision to deny the subdivision; or,
2. Remand the application back to the Hearing Examiner for additional consideration or
clarification, with the Council specifiying the items or issues to be considered.
(Note that Staff will be present to represent the Hearing Examiner's decision; Staff may also be
called upon to answer questions regarding the project staff report and reconsideration request.)
Previous Council Action
None.
Narrative
In October 2006, staff conducted a pre-application meeting with representatives for Steve Smith
Development LLC (the Applicant) regarding a proposed multi-family redevelopment and formal
plat subdivision at 23800 Edmonds Way using the townhouse subdivision process. The Applicant
applied for design review of the project (Arbor Court) in February 2007. After a public hearing,
the 35-unit project received ADB approval in June 2007. In November 2007, the Applicant
applied for building permits to redevelop the site; those permits are still in the permit review
process.
In March 2008, the Applicant applied for a formal plat subdivision to create fee-simple lots
associated with each of the 35 residential units. The formal plat review process was based on the
concept of a ‘townhouse’ subdivision for multi-family developments. The townhouse review
process is based on a formal staff interpretation from 2003 (Interpretation 2003-01) which was not
appealed and has been in effect since that date. Since the Interpretation was issued, this process
Packet Page 165 of 426
has been used several times and those formal plat subdivisions were approved by former Hearing
Examiners -- as well as one that was approved by the current Hearing Examiner.
For this project, staff prepared a report recommending the Hearing Examiner approve the
townhouse subdivision with conditions (Exhibit 1). A public hearing on the proposed subdivision
was held on May 15, 2008. The Hearing Examiner denied preliminary plat approval on May 22,
2008 (Exhibit 2). Three Requests for Reconsideration were filed in a timely manner (Exhibits 3 -
5). The Hearing Examiner took longer than the customary ten days to review and analyze the
reconsideration requests but ultimately upheld the denial on June 30, 2008 (Exhibit 6). The
Applicant filed an appeal of the Hearing Examiner’s decision in a timely manner on July 2, 2008
(Exhibit 7). Verbatim minutes of the May 15, 2008, public hearing are also attached (Exhibit 8).
In their appeal, the Applicant is requesting the Council reverse the Hearing Examiner’s denial of
the proposed 35-lot formal plat. They maintain that the plat as originally proposed (Exhibit 1),
and as further clarified in their Reconsideration (Exhibit 4), meets the criteria for approval of a
townhouse subdivision.
In their reconsideration request, Staff also raised concerns, noting that a number of similar projects
have previously been approved using the townhouse model. Staff raised these concerns and others
in the City’s reconsideration request (Exhibit 5) and while the Hearing Examiner did not reverse
entirely, she agreed that her understanding regarding the minimum lot area requirements for
multi-family developments had been in error. That concern (minimum lot size) is no longer at
issue.
It is important to remember that the townhouse subdivision process exists only to create fee-simple
lots in multi-family developments. The buildings the Applicant has proposed were approved by
the ADB and can receive building permits as long as they meet the required building and zoning
codes. As mentioned before, the proposed structures are currently being reviewed for building
permits. If approved, and without the subdivision, the Applicant could then build the proposed
multi-family structures and either rent them or create condominiums. The other option, as intended
by the townhouse subdivision process, is to create what are in essence single-family ownership
opportunities in the development rather than having a rental or condominium situation.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Staff Report
Link: Exhibit 2: Hearing Examiner's Preliminary Plat Decision
Link: Exhibit 3: Rutledge Reconsideration Request
Link: Exhibit 4: Applicant's Reconsideration Request
Link: Exhibit 5: City's Reconsideration Request
Link: Exhibit 6: Hearing Examiner's Reconsideration Request Decision
Link: Exhibit 7: Applicant's Appeal
Link: Exhibit 8: Applicant's letter in support of the appeal
Form Routing/Status
Packet Page 166 of 426
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 01:30 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 01:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 02:17 PM APRV
Form Started By: Michael
Clugston
Started On: 07/16/2008 02:20
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 167 of 426
Packet Page 168 of 426
Packet Page 169 of 426
Packet Page 170 of 426
Packet Page 171 of 426
Packet Page 172 of 426
Packet Page 173 of 426
Packet Page 174 of 426
Packet Page 175 of 426
Packet Page 176 of 426
Packet Page 177 of 426
Packet Page 178 of 426
Packet Page 179 of 426
Packet Page 180 of 426
Packet Page 181 of 426
Packet Page 182 of 426
Packet Page 183 of 426
Packet Page 184 of 426
Packet Page 185 of 426
Packet Page 186 of 426
Packet Page 187 of 426
Packet Page 188 of 426
Packet Page 189 of 426
Packet Page 190 of 426
Packet Page 191 of 426
Packet Page 192 of 426
Packet Page 193 of 426
Packet Page 194 of 426
Packet Page 195 of 426
Packet Page 196 of 426
Packet Page 197 of 426
Packet Page 198 of 426
Packet Page 199 of 426
Packet Page 200 of 426
Packet Page 201 of 426
Packet Page 202 of 426
Packet Page 203 of 426
Packet Page 204 of 426
Packet Page 205 of 426
Packet Page 206 of 426
Packet Page 207 of 426
Packet Page 208 of 426
Packet Page 209 of 426
Packet Page 210 of 426
Packet Page 211 of 426
Packet Page 212 of 426
Packet Page 213 of 426
Packet Page 214 of 426
Packet Page 215 of 426
Packet Page 216 of 426
Packet Page 217 of 426
Packet Page 218 of 426
Packet Page 219 of 426
Packet Page 220 of 426
Packet Page 221 of 426
Packet Page 222 of 426
Packet Page 223 of 426
Packet Page 224 of 426
Packet Page 225 of 426
Packet Page 226 of 426
Packet Page 227 of 426
Packet Page 228 of 426
Packet Page 229 of 426
Packet Page 230 of 426
Packet Page 231 of 426
Packet Page 232 of 426
Packet Page 233 of 426
Packet Page 234 of 426
Packet Page 235 of 426
Packet Page 236 of 426
Packet Page 237 of 426
Packet Page 238 of 426
Packet Page 239 of 426
Packet Page 240 of 426
Packet Page 241 of 426
Packet Page 242 of 426
Packet Page 243 of 426
Packet Page 244 of 426
Packet Page 245 of 426
Packet Page 246 of 426
Packet Page 247 of 426
Packet Page 248 of 426
Packet Page 249 of 426
Packet Page 250 of 426
Packet Page 251 of 426
Packet Page 252 of 426
Packet Page 253 of 426
Packet Page 254 of 426
Packet Page 255 of 426
Packet Page 256 of 426
Packet Page 257 of 426
Packet Page 258 of 426
Packet Page 259 of 426
Packet Page 260 of 426
Packet Page 261 of 426
Packet Page 262 of 426
Packet Page 263 of 426
Packet Page 264 of 426
Packet Page 265 of 426
Packet Page 266 of 426
Packet Page 267 of 426
Packet Page 268 of 426
Packet Page 269 of 426
Packet Page 270 of 426
Packet Page 271 of 426
Packet Page 272 of 426
Packet Page 273 of 426
Packet Page 274 of 426
Packet Page 275 of 426
Packet Page 276 of 426
Packet Page 277 of 426
Packet Page 278 of 426
Packet Page 279 of 426
Packet Page 280 of 426
Packet Page 281 of 426
Packet Page 282 of 426
Packet Page 283 of 426
Packet Page 284 of 426
Packet Page 285 of 426
Packet Page 286 of 426
Packet Page 287 of 426
Packet Page 288 of 426
Packet Page 289 of 426
Packet Page 290 of 426
Packet Page 291 of 426
Packet Page 292 of 426
Packet Page 293 of 426
Packet Page 294 of 426
Packet Page 295 of 426
Packet Page 296 of 426
Packet Page 297 of 426
Packet Page 298 of 426
Packet Page 299 of 426
Packet Page 300 of 426
Packet Page 301 of 426
Packet Page 302 of 426
Packet Page 303 of 426
Packet Page 304 of 426
Packet Page 305 of 426
Packet Page 306 of 426
Packet Page 307 of 426
Packet Page 308 of 426
Packet Page 309 of 426
Packet Page 310 of 426
Packet Page 311 of 426
Packet Page 312 of 426
Packet Page 313 of 426
Packet Page 314 of 426
Packet Page 315 of 426
Packet Page 316 of 426
Packet Page 317 of 426
Packet Page 318 of 426
Packet Page 319 of 426
Packet Page 320 of 426
Packet Page 321 of 426
Packet Page 322 of 426
Packet Page 323 of 426
Packet Page 324 of 426
Packet Page 325 of 426
Packet Page 326 of 426
Packet Page 327 of 426
Packet Page 328 of 426
Packet Page 329 of 426
Packet Page 330 of 426
Packet Page 331 of 426
Packet Page 332 of 426
Packet Page 333 of 426
Packet Page 334 of 426
Packet Page 335 of 426
Packet Page 336 of 426
Packet Page 337 of 426
Packet Page 338 of 426
Packet Page 339 of 426
Packet Page 340 of 426
Packet Page 341 of 426
Packet Page 342 of 426
Packet Page 343 of 426
Packet Page 344 of 426
Packet Page 345 of 426
Packet Page 346 of 426
Packet Page 347 of 426
Packet Page 348 of 426
Packet Page 349 of 426
Packet Page 350 of 426
Packet Page 351 of 426
Packet Page 352 of 426
Packet Page 353 of 426
Packet Page 354 of 426
Packet Page 355 of 426
Packet Page 356 of 426
Packet Page 357 of 426
Packet Page 358 of 426
Packet Page 359 of 426
Packet Page 360 of 426
Packet Page 361 of 426
Packet Page 362 of 426
Packet Page 363 of 426
Packet Page 364 of 426
Packet Page 365 of 426
Packet Page 366 of 426
Packet Page 367 of 426
Packet Page 368 of 426
Packet Page 369 of 426
Packet Page 370 of 426
Packet Page 371 of 426
Packet Page 372 of 426
Packet Page 373 of 426
Packet Page 374 of 426
Packet Page 375 of 426
Packet Page 376 of 426
Packet Page 377 of 426
Packet Page 378 of 426
Packet Page 379 of 426
Packet Page 380 of 426
Packet Page 381 of 426
AM-1691 6.
Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment at 110 Sunset Ave N
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/29/2008
Submitted By:Rob Chave Time:30 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public Hearing on the recommendation by the Planning Board to deny a proposal to amend
the Comprehensive Plan from “Downtown Mixed Commercial” to either (1) “Downtown
Residential Office” or (2) “Multi Family – High Density” at 110 Sunset Ave. N. (File No.
AMD-07-16)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Council asked the Planning Board to consider a proposal to change the plan designation for 110
Sunset during the 2007 plan amendment process. The Plannning Board reported back to Council in
September 2007 that it preferred to take the matter up during 2008, which it has done.
Narrative
This is a proposal made initially by Harold Huston to change the comprehensive plan map
designation for property at 110 Sunset. The property is currently designated as part of the
downtown commercial area, “Downtown Mixed Commercial,” and zoned BD2. Mr. Huston
asked for consideration to change the designation to “Downtown Residential Office” (which
would correspond to an OR zone), or “Multi Family – High Density” (RM-1.5 or RM-2.4).
The Board held a public hearing on July 9, 2008, and after consideration of the recommendation
of staff (Exhibit 2) and public testimony, forwarded a unanimous recommendation to Council to
deny the plan amendment proposal. The reasoning of the Planning Board is contained in the record
of the hearing (Exhibit 1).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Planning Board Minutes
Link: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Agenda Packet
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 01:30 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/24/2008 01:53 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/24/2008 02:17 PM APRV
Packet Page 382 of 426
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 07/24/2008 10:55
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/24/2008
Packet Page 383 of 426
DRAFT
Subject to August 13th Approval
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
July 9, 2008
Vice Chair Bowman called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers,
Public Safety Complex, 259 – 5th Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Cary Guenther, Chair (arrived at 7:06 p.m.)
Michael Bowman, Vice Chair
John Dewhirst
Judith Works
Jim Young
Don Henderson
John Reed
Philip Lovell
STAFF PRESENT
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Karin Noyes, Recorder
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
BOARD MEMBER DEWHIRST MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE 11, 2008 BE APPROVED AS
SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER HENDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
BOARD MEMBER HENDERSON MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE 18, 2008 BE APPROVED AS
SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER DEWHIRST SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
No changes were made to the agenda.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
No one in the audience expressed a desire to address the Board during this portion of the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PROPERTY AT 110 SUNSET
AVENUE NORTH FROM DOWNTOWN MIXED COMMERCIAL TO DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL OFFICE
(FILE NUMBER AMD-07-16
Mr. Chave advised that the public hearing is regarding a proposal by Harold Huston, a resident at 111 Main Street, to change
the Comprehensive Plan designation of property at 110 Sunset Avenue from Downtown Mixed Commercial to either
Packet Page 384 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 2
Downtown Residential Office or Multi-Family – High Density. He further advised that the proposal was referred to the
Planning Board at the request of the City Council as a follow-up to a specific request made by Mr. Huston. He recalled that
Mr. Huston appeared before the Planning Board previously. While they did not recommend approval of the proposed
change at that time, they did recommend to Council that the issue be taken up during the 2008 review of Comprehensive
Plan amendments. He reminded the Board that the plan designations and zoning for the commercial properties in the
Downtown Activity Center (including the subject property) were the subject of a significant update to the Comprehensive
Plan in 2004 and 2005, and the process resulted in the current plan that was adopted in March of 2005. A follow-up update
of the zoning map was completed in 2007, at which time the various BD zones were applied within the Downtown Activity
Center.
Mr. Chave provided a map illustrating the location of the subject property, which is currently developed with a single-family
residence. He explained that the property is located within the current BD2 zone and has a similar depth as other properties
that are located water ward on Sunset Avenue. He described the current zoning for the surrounding properties, as well. He
provided a map from the Comprehensive Plan, showing that the subject property is located on the edge of a much larger
commercial area. He explained that one unique aspect of the subject property is the single-family residential property that is
located immediately to the northeast. He noted that most other commercial zones in the downtown area are actually
separated from single-family residential zones by using multi-family residential zoning. However, he summarized that the
subject property is part of the larger commercial center, and has been zoned and planned as such for many years. He also
provided a zoning and vicinity map showing that the existing zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The
commercial zone includes the subject properties, as well as those east and west and is beginning to extend north towards the
downtown area.
Board Member Guenther arrived at 7:06 p.m.
Mr. Chave pointed out that Mr. Huston owns property adjacent to the subject property, and he has raised concern that no
transition would be required between the commercially zoned property and the single-family residential zoned property. Mr.
Huston has suggested that because there is already a residential home located on the subject parcel, it might be appropriate to
change the zoning to the new Downtown Residential Office designation, similar to the properties that are currently located
on the west side of Sunset Avenue. Mr. Chave clarified that the Planned Residential Office land use designation and the
Office/Residential zoning designation were created specifically for properties on the west side of Sunset Avenue to address
unique topography and transitional challenges. These same challenges do not exist on the property located at 110 Sunset
Avenue. Therefore, the language in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning code would have to be amended in order to
entertain the idea of applying this zoning and land use designation to the subject property. He noted that this would end up
drawing the boundary closer to Main Street than is currently found elsewhere west of 5th Avenue. All the other commercial
properties along Main Street are at least as deep as the two lots at this location, and it is a concern that reducing the
commercial depth from Main Street could hinder future commercial uses and activities along this important commercial
street.
Mr. Chave explained that when reviewing the overall plan and zoning pattern, it becomes apparent that if a transition is to be
consistent with the other portions of downtown, then some type of multi-family designation could be considered for the
properties north of 110 Sunset rather than for 110 Sunset itself. However, he noted there has been indication that the
property owners want this change, and there is no indication that the change would be beneficial to the City or the
neighborhood. At this time, the multi-family properties along the west side of 2nd Avenue North demark the westward
boundary of more intensive uses, providing a step down of intensity from the more intensely developed commercial
properties along 3rd and 4th Avenues. He agreed that it might be appropriate to consider the residentially zoned properties in
the future, since they are sandwiched between more intense zoning on both sides.
Mr. Chave recommended the Planning Board recommend denial of the proposed amendment.
Board Member Henderson asked Mr. Chave to identify the differences between uses allowed in an Office/Residential (OR)
zone compared to those allowed in a Multi-Family Residential Zone. Mr. Chave explained that the existing BD2 zoning
does not allow residential development to occur on the street front, and the OR zone would. An OR zone would allow a
multi-family residential building to be constructed as opposed to requiring mixed-use development, which is the normal
Packet Page 385 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 3
development pattern for the downtown. An OR zoning designation would also restrict the height limit to 25 feet, whereas
the BD2 zone would allow a height of 25 feet plus an additional 5 feet.
Harold Huston, Edmonds, thanked the Board for their hard work as volunteers for the City. He explained that he initially
raised the issue of changing the Comprehensive with each individual City Council Member. They appeared to all concur
with his suggestion that the property was inappropriately zoned because of the size of the lot and the problems that exist.
They suggested that he bring the issue before the full City Council, which he did. They offered no objections and requested
that the matter be referred to the Planning Board for consideration. He said he also received favorable support from the
property owners in the area. He recalled that, last year, the Board decided that all of the proposed changes for
inappropriately zoned properties should come before them at one time. At that time, both of the City’s senior planners (Mr.
Wilson and Mr. Bullock) agreed with his proposal. In fact, Mr. Wilson suggested the City Council establish a moratorium
on the property until the Planning Board could forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding a change in zoning.
Mr. Huston advised that the last time he spoke with Mr. Chave, Mr. Chave suggested he consider proposing a Multi-Family
Residential (RM) zoning designation for the subject property. Mr. Chave noted that elsewhere throughout the City, RM
zoning has been used as a transition between Single-Family Residential (RS) and Commercial zones. He said he indicated to
Mr. Chave that he would have no problem changing the zoning to some type of RM designation, either.
Mr. Huston reviewed that the subject property was originally owned by Mr. Al Dykes, and he tried to construct
condominiums on the property but the City denied his proposal. The property was later sold to Mr. Bob Gregg, and he
doesn’t believe the lot is feasible for condominium development, either.
Mr. Huston pointed out that, as presently zoned, the current zoning would allow development to occur on the subject
property clear back to the alley, which would leave a 16-foot alley and eliminate seven parking spaces behind the property.
He suggested that this would clearly result in a safety issue since a significant amount of traffic uses the alley way for access.
People turn into and out of the alley from Bell Street and Main Street. In addition, there are two-way turns from the
commercial development and delivery trucks sit in the area for large part of the day, making it difficult for cars to get around.
Mr. Huston said he conducted his own informal traffic study of the alley, particularly of the commercial traffic that uses the
alley for access. The situation is tight, and there are numerous accidents. On the north side, there is only 9’4” of width, and
there is also a blind spot trying to get out of the alley. Everyday, delivery trucks park in front of the café, and in front of 110
Sunset Avenue. This results in one-way traffic along the street. As a result of the recent rezone, the property across the
street will be redeveloped, further adding to the problem. He said he previously recommended the City eliminate the ability
make a left hand turn from this property, but the City was chosen not to do so. People who walk in this area are forced to do
so on one of the busiest intersections in Edmonds.
Mr. Huston said he also surveyed the available parking spaces in the area and found there is a total of 86 cars using the alley
for access to and from parking. He suggested this creates a safety issue. He noted that the first two lots across the street
from the subject property are zoned and developed as commercial, and they always have been zoned that way. However, the
subject property is currently developed a single-family residence and has never been used for commercial. Two larger
developers in the City have indicated to him that the site is not developable as currently zoned. He said he doesn’t have a
problem allowing the current property owner to redevelop the site, but it would be appropriate to rezone the property to
provide some type of transition similar to what was done on the west side of Sunset Avenue. He summarized that there is a
significant traffic problem on this busy street, and he would like the Board to consider the proposed change to address the
safety concerns.
Board Member Henderson said that while he appreciates Mr. Huston’s concerns about traffic and safety associated with the
alley, he questioned how the proposed amendment would address the issue. Mr. Huston explained that if the subject parcel
is redeveloped according to the last plans that were proposed by Mr. Gregg, seven parking spaces along the alley would have
to be eliminated. Development of the property as currently zoned would also reduce the width of the alley to 16-feet, making
it difficult for cars to get around the delivery trucks that park behind the commercial building. At this time, there is sufficient
width for cars to get around the trucks. Mr. Huston also pointed out that the OR and RM zoning designations would also
require a setback to make the property more usable, in his opinion.
Packet Page 386 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 4
Alan Young, Edmonds, said he owns the subject property at 110 Sunset Avenue. He expressed dismay that he did not
receive any notification from the City until he arrived home on June 27th to find the notice of the hearing. He suggested that,
as the property owner, he should have been notified of the proposed amendment that would impact his property only. He
voiced concern that discussions about his property have been going on for 20 months without him even knowing. He said he
does not believe the City has the right to change the zoning of his property without involving him in the discussions, and he
invited staff to provide an explanation of the City’s notification requirements. Mr. Young referred to Mr. Huston’s earlier
statement that he spoke with the neighbors who indicated they were in favor of the proposed change. He pointed out that
Mr. Huston never spoke to him about the change, and in fact, most of the neighbors are opposed to the change, as well.
Mr. Young advised that he participated in the City’s process for creating the new MPOR zone. He recalled that all of the
neighbors were invited to participate in the process of creating a zone for the three lots on the west side of Sunset Avenue.
Mr. Huston did not submit his request that the property at 110 Sunset Avenue be included until after the process had been
completed. He suggested that Mr. Huston’s concerns did not surface until he purchased a condominium property in May of
2006. He took possession of the property on October 1, 2007, two weeks before the City Council met to make a final
decision on the MPOR zoning proposal.
Mr. Young suggested that the proposed amendment is not about creating a transition area. Instead, it is intended to address
Mr. Huston’s concerns about the lot size and the seven parking spaces that are currently located on private property. Mr.
Young said he purchased the property where the seven parking spaces are located in order to preserve his view, and he paid
$1.7 million for the parcel. He suggested the proposal is more about property value than about providing an appropriate
transition. He further suggested there are inaccuracies in the information submitted by Mr. Huston. He said his property is
valued at $1.3 million and now Mr. Huston wants to reduce that value by changing the zoning. He emphasized that Mr.
Huston purchased his property knowing full well what the zoning, height and covenants were.
Mr. Chave explained that the Planning Board’s discussions last year regarding the subject parcel were informational, and
they were asked if they wanted to take a look at the property. After some discussion, the Planning Board agreed they did not
want to consider any changes as part of last year’s amendments, but they agreed to consider the matter again in 2008. Once
the Board formally agrees to look at a proposal, the notification process is triggered. However, no specific actions were
being considered as part of the 2007 discussion. He summarized that the City did not attempt to be sneak the matter by the
property owner.
Board Member Young inquired who owns the property at 110 Sunset Avenue. Mr. Chave answered that the property is
currently owned by Alan Young. However, he clarified that the City’s code allows anyone to apply for a Comprehensive
Plan amendment and there are no restrictions on who owns the subject property. While the Planning Board is not required to
act favorably on a Comprehensive Plan amendment application, they must forward a recommendation on the proposal to the
City Council. In this case, he noted that the proposal was referred to the Planning Board by the City Council, and the Board
is obligated to make a recommendation.
Board Member Lovell asked for more information about the property known as 111 Main Street. Mr. Chave explained that
this property is one of the addresses located inside of the large mixed-use building to the southeast and across the alley from
the subject property.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, expressed surprise that while Alan Young was heavily involved in the Sunset Avenue issue in
the past, he was not informed about the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment until the hearing notices were sent out.
He said he believes Mr. Young to be a credible witness, and he feels the application is highly irregular. He suggested that if
the City Council had known the property owner was against the proposal, they would probably not have referred the
amendment to the Planning Board for review. He also emphasized that neither Mr. Wilson nor Mr. Bullock are part of the
City Planning Department now.
Mr. Hertrich pointed out that the parking spaces referred to earlier by Mr. Huston are located on private property and always
have been, even though the public has used them on occasion. He said he does not find anything that would constitute a
reason for the Board to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. He referred to the findings in the Staff Report,
Packet Page 387 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 5
which provide more than enough reason to recommend denial of the “spot change.” He expressed his belief that
Comprehensive Plan changes should involve larger areas rather than single lots.
Jack Jacobsen, Edmonds, said he received two notices of the proposed amendment because he owns two properties that are
located within 200 feet of the subject site. He pointed out that if the Comprehensive Plan were amended to allow an OR
zoning designation, development could occur right up to the rear property line with no setback. This would allow a
developer to build right up to the alley. He expressed his belief that all of the RS zoned properties would likely change to
OR or RM zoning in the future.
Elton Roundhill, Edmonds, said he and his wife recently purchased Rory’s, which is located adjacent to the subject
property at 100 Main Street. He said he was not aware that the existing zero setback requirement. He noted that the property
line for the subject property line is located in the middle of the alleyway, and the proposed change could greatly affect the
way his business currently operates. He said he and his wife are opposed to any change that would impede their existing
access. Mr. Chave clarified that the alleyway must be a certain width as required by City code, but he agreed there is an
additional paved area outside of the alley that is privately owned. Under both the existing and the proposed zoning, this
paved portion could be redeveloped, but the alley could not. Mr. Roundhill clarified that he was referring to the access area
leading to his property, and not the alleyway.
Mr. Young advised that he owns the paved portion of the property along the alleyway, and he has never stopped the owners
of Rory’s from using the property as an access to their commercial building. However, there is no formal agreement in place
to require the access to continue. Chair Guenther reminded the Board and the public that the purpose of the hearing is to
determine the appropriateness of the proposed Comprehensive Plan change, and not to discuss setback and access issues
between two property owners.
Board Member Young said he is embarrassed by the whole process that allows a person to take up the Board, public and
staff’s time to consider a proposed Comprehensive Plan change for property that he/she doesn’t even own. He reminded the
Board that this same piece of property was discussed previously as part of the City’s effort to create the Downtown Plan.
Chair Guenther reminded the Board and public that the purpose of the hearing is to discuss the merits of the proposed
Comprehensive Plan change. However, he agreed that it is ridiculous to allow people to propose changes for properties they
do not even own.
THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Board Member Henderson said that if the property owner were requesting the Comprehensive Plan amendment, he would be
more inclined to consider the proposal. However, he said he is not sure he could support the change either way. He
summarized that since the property owner is not in support of the proposed change, he is not inclined to even consider the
request.
Board Member Dewhirst said he would not support the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. However, his concerns
are not related to property ownership. He said he does not believe the proposed change is appropriate at this time. He
referred to the activity and zoning patterns that currently exist in the area to the west and east of the subject property and
expressed his belief that the proposed change would be a step in the wrong direction. He agreed with the staff’s finding that
if a transition were needed in this area in the future, it should be on the next few parcels to the north. He summarized his
belief that it would be quite a long time before any change of this type would occur. He further noted that the proposed
amendment would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies.
Vice Chair Bowman said he would vote against the proposed amendment, and he was opposed to the change when it was
previously presented to the Planning Board, also.
Chair Guenther said he cannot support the proposed change, either. He said he sees the proposal as a type of “spot planning”
that leads to “spot zoning.” He agreed with the staff’s finding that the proposal would be a step in the wrong direction. The
more intense zoning should be moving towards Main Street rather than away from Main Street. He concluded that the safety
concerns raised by Mr. Huston would be better addressed by the Traffic Engineer rather than the Planning Board.
Packet Page 388 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 6
Board Member Works said she would not support the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment because it would lead to
“spot planning.” She suggested it would be helpful to have some discussion with the City Council about how matters of this
type are referred to the Board. It would also be helpful for the City Council to consider whether or not they inadvertently
gave Mr. Huston the impression that the proposed change would be appropriate and something they would support. She
agreed with Chair Guenther that traffic problems should be addressed by the City’s Traffic Engineer.
Board Member Lovell pointed out that while he would not be voting on the proposal, he would not be in favor of it. He
referred to a comment made at the beginning of the presentation that the BD2 zone allows both residential and office uses.
He noted that other than the slight difference in the height restriction, there would be very little difference to justify the
proposed change. In addition, he expressed his belief that too many changes would likely occur in this area in the future to
consider changing this one piece of property right now.
Board Member Reed said he would not support the proposed amendment, either. He agreed with Board Member Dewhirst’s
previous comments. He added that as he reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Zoning Map, he found the existing
zoning and land use designation to be exactly as they should be.
BOARD MEMBER DEWHIRST MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF
DENIAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FILE NUMBER AMD-07-16 (AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PROPERTY AT 110 SUNSET AVENUE NORTH FROM MIXED
COMMERCIAL TO DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) BASED ON THE REASONS STATED IN THE
STAFF REPORT. HE NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD NOT CONFORM TO ANY OF
THE CITY COUNCIL’S RECENT ACTIONS RELATED TO LAND USE PATTERNS, ZONING PATTERNS,
AND THE RECENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. BOARD MEMBER WORKS SECONDED THE
MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Board Member Dewhirst suggested that the City may have a short circuit in their procedures for Comprehensive Plan Map
amendments. While he understands that, by State law, anyone can request a Comprehensive Plan amendment, it would be
appropriate for the City to somehow notify a property owner if his/her property is being considered for a change, even if a
formal application has not been filed. It is important for a property owner to know when his/her private property is going to
be discussed at a City Council or Planning Board Meeting. He suggested that staff review the notification process for these
situations.
THE BOARD TOOK A BREAK AT 8:05 P.M. THEY RECONVENED THE MEETING AT 8:13 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY ON REVISIONS TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC)
CHAPTER 17 – PROPERTY PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NOT INCLUDING 17.40)
Mr. Bowman reminded the Board that, upon the advice of the City Attorney, the nuisance regulations were moved forward to
the City Council for inclusion in the City’s Municipal Code. He explained that the purpose of this hearing is to consider the
new Chapter 17.60 – Property Performance Standards. He suggested that the most controversial provision in the proposed
language is related to the regulation of recreational vehicles (RV’s). He noted that the City receives complaints about RV’s
on a regular basis, so staff has brought the matter to the Planning Board for inclusion in the performance standards. He
advised that contrary to what some people have suggested, the proposed language found in Chapter 17.60.040 would not ban
RV parking. However, it would introduce provisions to regulate the use. Mr. Bowman advised that significant changes are
also proposed for Chapter 17.60.030.F. He explained that after consulting with the City Attorney, it was felt that the
proposed new standards in this section would be more enforceable. He introduced Mike Theis, Code Enforcement Officer,
who was present to answer the Board’s questions regarding the proposed language.
The Board and staff reviewed the proposed language and made the following comments:
Packet Page 389 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 7
• Chapter 17.60.010 – Proof of Compliance. Mr. Bowman explained that the proposed language would require a business
or use to retain an independent, qualified testing laboratory to make an analysis of the use to determine if it is in
compliance with the standards. This places the burden of proof on the property owner rather than the City.
• Chapter 17.60.030.A – Noise. Board Member Henderson noted that every year when the Edmonds Rotary Club sponsors
the Waterfront Festival, they cut off the music at 10 p.m. because that was their understanding of the City’s noise
ordinance. The proposed language would allow the music to continue until 11:30 p.m. Mr. Bowman pointed out that
there are different noise standards that apply to various areas.
• Chapter 17.60.030.B – Lighting. Board Member Dewhirst noted that this section regulates glare on public streets,
highways and neighboring properties, but it does not address the issue of light pollution in the sky. Mr. Bowman noted
the Board previously stated concern about light pollution, and agreed that staff should come back with a proposed code
amendment in the future.
• Chapter 17.60.030.F – Particulate Matter. Mr. Bowman advised that the three items in this section were redrafted to
make them more consistent with the existing adopted City regulations. It was noted that the term “ACC, surface mining”
should be deleted from the proposed language for Item F.2.
• Chapter 17.60.040 – Vehicles in Residential Zones. Mr. Bowman advised that this section was drafted in response to
complaints the City constantly receives about vehicles that are parked on residential properties, including RV’s, boats, etc.
Board Member Works inquired if the City’s Fire Department has reviewed the draft language to address safety issues
related to the storage of RV’s. Mr. Bowman answered that they have not. Board Member Works noted that house fires
tend to jump from one home to another because homes are constructed so close together. She said she would be interested
in learning more from the Fire Department about issues related to safety when RV’s are parked in the side yard setbacks.
Board Member Young agreed and recalled that the Board discussed side yard setbacks previously. He expressed his belief
that the City should prohibit RV’s that are not used from parking in the side yard setback areas.
• Chapter 17.60.040.B.1.b – Vehicles in Residential Zones. Mr. Chave suggested the term “this regulation” should be
more specific as to what regulation is being referenced.
• Chapter 17.60.040.C – Vehicles in Residential Zones. Board Member Dewhirst inquired why the language only
encourages screening from adjacent properties rather than requiring it. Mr. Bowman answered that most people actually
do screen their vehicles from adjacent properties. However, if the Board wants to make this a requirement, staff could
make the change.
Chair Guenther pointed out that screening can be vegetation, as well as built items. He noted that any screening over six
feet in height would require a building permit. Mr. Bowman noted that, currently, this requirement would only apply to
built screening.
Mr. Chave pointed out that this section applies to all residential properties. If it is important that the regulations only
apply to single-family properties, the language should make this clear. He noted that a multi-family residential complex
could have a designated area for parking recreational vehicles, and the provisions, as currently proposed, would not allow
this to occur. He suggested the Board take a closer look throughout this entire section to make it clear whether the
provisions would apply to single-family residential only or to multi-family residential, as well.
• Chapter 17.60.040.E.1 – Vehicles in Residential Zones. Board Member Henderson said he owns property in Edmonds,
which has a parking strip located parallel to the street in front of his home. He uses the space for visitor parking.
However, according to the proposed language, a parking strip that runs parallel to the street would not be allowed.
Parking strips must run parallel to the driveway, instead. Board Member Lovell said he currently knows of situations
where property owners have constructed improved parking spaces parallel to the street in front of their homes. These
spaces are located within the setback areas. Mr. Bowman explained that the proposed language would not prohibit
vehicles from parking in the setback areas. However, when parking is created parallel to the street, the vehicles can take
up a large portion of the front yard and make the home less visible. Board Member Henderson said he does not think the
Packet Page 390 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 8
language should limit improved parking surfaces to only those that are parallel to the driveway. If they want to prohibit
RV’s from parking in front of a house, they should limit the types of vehicles that can be parked in the front setback. He
suggested that improved spaces for guest parking should not be regulated by the City.
Board Member Young pointed out that there are numerous neighborhoods that were annexed into the City from the
County, and parking strips parallel to the street are normal and serve a very useful purpose as long as they are only for
guest parking. He said he would support a provision that prohibits vehicles from parking in these areas for more than 72
hours. He noted that the City does not allow storage and other structures in the front yard, so it would not be appropriate
to allow RV parking and storage, either.
At the request of the Board, Mr. Bowman agreed to modify the language in this section to allow guest parking as an
exception.
• Chapter 17.60.040.E.2 – Vehicles in Residential Zones. Board Member Dewhirst pointed out that the development
code does not define the terms “front yard,” “side yard,” and “back yard.” He questioned if this section refers to the
required setback. Mr. Bowman explained that, theoretically, the proposed language would allow vehicles to park in the
setback areas. However, he noted that the City does not currently allow structures to be located within the setback areas,
so it may be appropriate to also prohibit vehicles such as RV’s from parking in the setback areas, as well. Board Member
Dewhirst expressed particular concern about allowing RV’s to park on the property line. He pointed out that houses are
being constructed closer together, and setbacks are becoming more important.
Board Member Young pointed out that Item E talks about appropriately licensed and operable vehicles, but Item E.2.a
makes reference to junk vehicles. Mr. Bowman agreed that Item E.2.a should be pulled from this section.
Mr. Bowman referred to Item E.2.a and suggested that the Board should discuss a possible definition for the term
“maintained surface.” He also noted that the reference in Item E.2.d.5 should relate back to Chapter 6 rather than Chapter
17.60.010.
Board Member Young referred to Item E.2.d.2 and noted that some people purchase cars to pull parts from and use the
parts to fix other cars. He asked how this language would apply to these situations. Mr. Bowman said the objective of the
proposed language is to allow a person to work on one vehicle at a time. Board Member Henderson noted that the
proposed language would require a person to have a large garage because cars that are being used for parts would have to
be stored in a structure or be screened from view.
Chair Guenther referred to Item E.2.d.10 and suggested the words “shall remain” be deleted.
Board Member Reed referred to Item E.2.d, which lists several activities that can occur on properties if certain criteria
could be met. He suggested and the Board agreed that the language should be changed to read, “Work, including
servicing, repairing, assembling, wrecking, modifying, restoring or otherwise working on vehicles outside an enclosed
structure on a property is prohibited unless it meets the following criteria:”
• Chapter 17.60.050 – Habitation Uses Prohibited. Mr. Bowman recalled that the Planning Board discussed this issue
previously and agreed the proposed exception would be appropriate.
Mr. Bowman reminded the Board that the City Council would be reviewing the Nuisance Ordinance on July 15th. He
emphasized that the Nuisance Ordinance does not include standards related to RV’s. He suggested the Board continue this
hearing to July 23rd so that those individuals who show up at the City Council Meeting prepared to speak about RV parking
can be directed to attend the continued Planning Board hearing before a recommendation is forwarded to the City Council.
Chair Guenther pointed out that it is sometimes difficult to apply all of the proposed standards equally throughout the City.
For example, large lots make it easier to hide an RV or other vehicles, while five cars parked on a small residential lot would
be too much. He suggested the Board consider the option of tailoring the requirements to the different sized residential lots.
Packet Page 391 of 426
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
July 9, 2008 Page 9
Board Member Young expressed concern about allowing owners of larger properties to park more vehicles on their lots,
particularly if the vehicles are inoperable. He cautioned against making requirements that are based upon the size of a lot.
Board Member Reed recalled that the Board spent a great deal of time in 2007 reviewing Chapter 17.60. He inquired if the
current draft represents any significant changes since the chapter was reviewed previously by the Board. Mr. Bowman
answered that staff did make some tweaks to address the issues raised, but no significant changes were made to the
document. He summarized that the proposed language was boiled down to what staff believes would be enforceable and
address issues that come up all the time. He agreed to provide the Board Members with copies of the most recent drafts of
the proposed amendment. Board Member Reed asked where definitions could be found for terms used in the proposed
language. He emphasized the importance of providing clear definitions. Mr. Bowman answered that staff would make sure
there are adequate definitions for each of the terms used.
Mr. Bowman advised that if the Board doesn’t want to regulate RV’s, they could direct staff to remove the language from the
proposed amendment. When people call to complain, staff could simply them that the City doesn’t regulate RV’s in
residential zones. The same is true for any of the other nuisance standards.
Board Member Works inquired how many complaints the City receives about RV’s. Mr. Theis answered that staff does not
keep track of the number of complaints because the City doesn’t regulate RV’s at this time. However, he estimated they
receive between 60 to 70 complaints per year related to RV’s, and this is their predominant complaint. He emphasized that,
at this time, there are no regulations to deal with vehicles. About the half the complaints are associated with vehicles, and
the majority of them are related to junk vehicles.
Larry Austin, Edmonds, said he has lived in his current home for the past 42 years. He provided pictures to illustrate on-
going situations that occur in his neighborhood and noted that the proposed amendments would address all of the issues. The
pictures illustrated the following concerns:
• A red car is parked in the front yard of a residential property on top of shredded wood. The property owner owns a tree
cutting business, and he puts the shredded tree material in his yard. The picture also showed two other cars parked on the
property, and both belong to the property owner.
• Chipped wood has been strewn on the ground with cars parked on top of it.
• Various materials are being stored in front of a garage, making the garage impossible for the property owner to use. There
is a truck and other material located in front of the garage, as well as motorcycles.
• A boat is stored in the backyard. There used to be a swimming pool in the backyard, but there was no fence to keep the
neighborhood children out.
• A personal car is parked on the street with a business card in the window to advertise the tree service.
Mr. Austin summarized that the existing situation is disturbing to him, and he has not received any results by contacting the
City’s Code Enforcement Officer to issue his complaints. He said he has learned that numerous complaints have been made
about the subject property, which is being used more as a storage facility than a residential home. He noted that the pictures
illustrate numerous violations, and the draft language would address them all. He urged the Board to recommend approval of
the draft language.
Board Member Young asked if running a business in a residential zone would be addressed by the proposed language. Mr.
Theis answered that this particular property owner has a home occupation permit, but the City does receive numerous
complaints about the condition of the property.
Missy Huff, Edmonds, referred to property located on 86th Place where two inoperable motor homes are being stored in a
side yard of a residential property. The property is a corner lot. When she pulls into her neighborhood, the first thing she
sees are the motor homes, and they have been there for at least three years. She summarized that the proposed performance
standards are necessary to deal with situations such as this.
Ms. Huff advised that she is a realtor, and she has had a house on the market across the street from a property that has
vehicles stored in the side yard. The car hasn’t been used for years, and a transformer from an electrical unit is being stored
Packet Page 392 of 426
Item #6a
City of Edmonds Z Planning Board
Meeting Date: July 9, 2008
Agenda Subject: Public Hearing on proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation
for property located at 110 Sunset Avenue from Downtown Mixed
Commercial to either (1) Downtown Residential Office or (2) Multi
Family – High Density. (File #AMD-07-16)
Staff Lead /
Author:
Rob Chave
Initiated By: ; City Council Planning Board City Staff ; Citizen Request
Other:
Background
This is a public hearing regarding a proposal by Harold Huston, a resident at 111 Main Street, to
change the comprehensive plan designation of property at 110 Sunset Avenue from Downtown
Mixed Commercial to either (1) Downtown Residential Office or (2) Multi Family – High
Density.
The site (110 Sunset) is currently occupied by a single family residence. Existing zoning of the
site is BD2, which is consistent with the property’s Comprehensive Plan designation. Attached to
this memo (Attachment 1) are maps showing, in order, an aerial view, two views of the current
plan designations, and, finally, the zoning of the property and its vicinity.
The proposal was referred to the Planning Board on the request of the City Council as a follow-up
to a specific request made Mr. Harold Huston, a nearby resident. Mr. Huston appeared before the
Planning Board previously (see Attachment 3 for materials from the earlier review), and the
Planning Board recommended to Council that the issue be taken up during 2008 (see particularly
the memorandum dated 9/27/2007 from Cary Guenther, Planning Board Chair).
Attachment 2 contains an excerpt from the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan which
details the policy direction for the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center. The subject property –
along with its surroundings – is located within the Activity Center.
The plan designations and zoning for the commercial properties in the Activity Center –
including 110 Sunset – were the subject of a significant update to the Comprehensive Plan in
2004-2005. This process resulted in the current plan, which was adopted in March, 2005. A
Edmonds Planning Board
Agenda Memo
Packet Page 393 of 426
2
follow-up update of the zoning map was completed in January 2007, at which time the various
BD zones were applied within the Downtown Activity Center.
Analysis
The purpose of this hearing is to explore the idea of whether a transition – and if so, what type of
transition – should be considered for the property located at 110 Sunset. Depending on the
outcome of the hearing, the Planning Board could recommend pursuing a specific change (with
another, specific hearing on that proposal), or the Board could decide not to pursue any further
action at this time. In the latter case, a memo to the Council explaining the Board’s position
would be in order.
The Planning Board’s rationale for deferring consideration of Mr. Huston’s request was based on
two issues, (1) whether there might be new development initiatives that indicate a need to revisit
portions of the downtown plan and zoning and (2) whether there are reasons for revisiting
transitions within the downtown area.
In the first case, while there has been much discussion concerning development within the
Downtown Master Plan district (focusing on the Skippers and antique mall properties), there is
not a clear direction regarding future development or the public role in that development. Because
the updates to the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center plan are so recent (2004/2005), it is
hard to make a case for re-opening the overall plan direction at this time, absent a compelling
change in the development pattern.
In the second case, much of downtown has a pattern of commercial uses bordered by multi family
uses before the final transition is made to single family uses. The location in question here is one
of a few in which commercial uses border single family zones directly. In fact, the subject
property is still in residential use, even though it is planned and zoned for commercial.
Given this situation, it could be argued that there is a need for some multi family zoning to help
provide a “transition” between the commercial and single family development areas. The problem
with changing the plan designation (and ultimately the zoning) of the subject property is two-
fold. First, it would move the boundary closer to Main Street than is currently found anywhere
else west of 5th Avenue. All the other commercial properties along Main Street are at least as deep
as the two lots at this location, and it is a concern that reducing the commercial depth from Main
Street could hinder future commercial uses and activity along this important commercial street.
When you look at the overall plan and zoning pattern it is apparent that if a transition is to be
consistent with the other portions of downtown, then some type of multi family designation could
be considered for the properties north of 110 Sunset, rather than on 110 Sunset itself. This is
would be consistent with the properties to the west and east of the subject area, on the west side
of Sunset and the west side of 2nd Avenue. In fact, the properties along the west side of Sunset
were just changed from single family to the new Planned Residential-Office designation and OR
zone in 2005 and 2007, respectively. A concern with this approach – moving the transition
northward along Sunset – would be whether the current established pattern warrants a change.
There is currently no indication that the owners of those properties would like to have their
properties changed, and no indication that a change would be beneficial to the city or the
neighborhood. Currently, the multifamily properties along the west side of 2nd Avenue North
Packet Page 394 of 426
3
demark the westward boundary of more intensive uses, providing a step-down of intensity from
the more intensively developed commercial properties along 3rd and 4th Avenues.
The other option would be to consider a different commercial zone for 110 Sunset, as Mr. Huston
suggests. However, the Planned Residential-Office designation was a very specifically developed
designation, addressing the unique topography and transitional challenges of those properties
along the west side of Sunset – not the same as the situation at 110 Sunset. Again, the concern is
that this could reduce the potential long-term viability of commercial uses along Main Street, and
it is hard to develop a justification for making this change for just a single property.
To make a change in the Comprehensive Plan, the following must be considered.
20.00.050 Findings.
Amendment to the comprehensive plan may be adopted only if the following
findings are made:
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the
Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and is in the public interest;
B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety or welfare of the city;
C. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of
land uses within the city; and
D. In the case of an amendment to the comprehensive policy plan map, the
subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use designation(s)
and the anticipated land use development(s), including, but not limited to, access,
provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses and absence of
physical constraints. [Ord. 3076 § 1, 1996].
Conclusions and Recommendation
The following is staff’s opinion on how the proposal relates to the four criteria.
A. Staff is concerned that the proposal would be inconsistent with the analysis and plan
amendments completed during the 2004/2005 plan update, which recently established the current
plan designations downtown.
B. The proposed change would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or welfare
of the city.
C. The proposed change would not alter the overall balance of land uses within the city, but
would create a unique situation at this location regarding the depth of the standard BD zoning
from Main Street. A more logical change would be to examine the properties north of 110 Sunset
for such a change, but staff is concerned that this is premature at this time, particularly since
undertaking such changes along the east side of Sunset could create a significant change in the
character of that street.
D. The topography and layout of the subject parcel is suitable for the proposed use, just as it is for
the current use. As discussed previously, staff is concerned that changing 110 Sunset to a more
restrictive commercial land use designation or a multi family designation would create an unusual
Packet Page 395 of 426
4
situation relative to the depth of the BD zone along Main Street (note that the neighboring
properties to the east and west of 110 Sunset are – and will remain – designated as Downtown
Mixed Commercial and zoned BD2).
Based on the foregoing discussion, staff recommends not making a change to the Comprehensive
Plan for the property at 110 Sunset – or the properties to the north – at this time.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map: Aerial
Vicinity Map: Comprehensive Plan; 1 inch = 200 feet
Vicinity Map: Comprehensive Plan; 1 inch = 400 feet
Vicinity Map: Zoning
2. Excerpt from Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Downtown Waterfront Activity
Center
3. Previous Planning Board material
Packet Page 396 of 426
2 N D A V E N
A D S T
D A V E S
Subject Property
010020050
Feet °
Packet Page 397 of 426
2 N D A V E N
S U
4 T H A
JA
M
E
S
ST
R O A D A V E
S U N S E T A V E S
2 N
3 R D AV
E
N B
ELL
M
AIN
S
T
3 R D A V E S
4 T H
A V E S
R A I L R O A D S T
2 N D A V E S
Subject Property
0200400100
Feet °
Multi Family -
High Density
Single Family
Urban 1
Downtown
Master
Plan
Downtown
Mixed
Commercial
Planned
Residence -
Office
Downtown
Mixed
Commercial
Retail
Core
Downtown
Mixed
Residential
MF -
Med
MF -
High
Packet Page 398 of 426
3 R D A V E N
2 N D A V E N
6 T H A V E N
S U N S E T A V E N
4 T H A V E N
JAMES ST
R A I L R O A D A V E
5 T H A V E N
S U N S E T A V E S
GLEN ST
2 N D A V E N
2 N D A V E N
3 R D A V E N
CAROL WAY
3 R D A V E N BELL ST
MAIN ST
6 T H A V E N
D AYTON ST
SATER LANE
3 R D A V E S
4 T H A V E S
E D M O N D S W Y /S R 1 0 4
6 T H A V E S
5 T H A V E S
WALN UT ST
R A I L R O A D S T
GILTNER LANE
D U R B I N S T
ALOHA WAY
2 N D A V E S
EDM
ONDS ST
ALDER ST
2 N D A V E S
3 R D A V E S
4 T H A V E S
4 T H A V E S
Subject Property
0 400 800200
Feet °
Multi Family -
High Density
Single Family
Urban 1
Downtown
Master
Plan
Public
Downtown
Mixed
Commercial
Retail
CoreDowntown
Mixed
Residential
MF -
Med
MF -
High
MF -
High
Public
Packet Page 399 of 426
((((((((((((((
(((((((((
((((((
((((
((((((((((((
((((((
((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((
((((((
(((((((((
((((((((((
(((((((((((((((
((((((
((((((
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
(((((((((
(((((((((
(((((((((
(((((((((
!!!!!!!!!
Brackett's
Landing
North
2 N D A V E N
RAILRO A D S T
2 N D A V E S
±
100 050
Feet
Zoning Vicinity Map
File AMD-2007-16
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
Rezones
PRD
RS-6
RS-8
RS-10
RS-12
RSW-12
RS-20
RS-MP
RM-3
RM-2.4
RM-1.5
RM-EW
(((((((((
BD1
((((((BD2
((((((BD3
(((((((((BD4
(((((((((
BD5
((((((OR
BP
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !BN
BC
BC-EW
CG
CG2
CW
MP1
MP2
MU
! ! !
! ! !P
OS
Subject Property
BD2
RM-1.5
RM-3
RM-2.4OR
BC
BD2
RS-6
Packet Page 400 of 426
Land Use 25
Downtown Waterfront Activity Center
A. Plan Context. A number of public plans and projects have been taking shape in recent years,
and these will have a profound impact on the future of the city’s downtown waterfront area. Some
of these ongoing activities include:
• Transportation planning and the Edmonds Crossing multimodal project which will move
the existing ferry terminal at the base of Main Street to a new multimodal transportation
center at Pt. Edwards.
• Continued development of the city’s waterfront parks and walkways into an
interconnected necklace of public spaces.
• The South County Senior Center is undertaking strategic planning to look at its facilities,
programs, and services.
• Public access to the water and the natural beauty of the waterfront figures prominently in
the Port of Edmonds’ plans, including new plazas, improved walkways and public art.
Public pedestrian/bicycle access across the railroad tracks to the waterfront, in the
vicinity of the south end of the marina, near Marina Beach Park, should remain a high
priority.
• Arts plans continue to be implemented throughout the downtown, including such projects
as the Edmonds Center for the Arts, the Artworks facility, and the continued expansion of
downtown festivals and events.
• Edmonds Community College has expanded its downtown presence through new
initiatives with the Edmonds Floral Conference Center and is working with the Edmonds
Center for the Arts to enhance overall operations.
B. Downtown Vision. Taken together, the goals and policies for the Downtown Waterfront
Activity Center present a vision for Edmonds downtown waterfront. By actively pursuing the
ferry terminal’s relocation, the City has set upon an ambitious and exciting course. It is a course
that holds promise for the downtown waterfront, but it is one that will require concerted action by
the entire community, including local, state and federal public officials, business groups and
citizens. While the challenges presented in this effort are substantial, the possible rewards are
even greater, for with its existing physical assets, future opportunities and the energy of its
citizens, Edmonds has the potential to create one of the region’s most attractive and vital city
centers.
Components of the overall vision for the downtown waterfront area include:
• The Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center provides convenient
transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes
Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal
reduces negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while still providing a link between the
terminal and downtown Edmonds. The project provides the community with varied
transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community.
Packet Page 401 of 426
26 Land Use
• Downtown is extended westward and connected to the shoreline by positive mixed-use
development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes. Redevelopment of the holding
lanes and SR-104 is pursued after the ferry terminal relocates to Point Edwards.
• The shoreline features a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, marina
facilities, and supporting uses.
• There is a more efficient transportation system featuring commuter and passenger trains,
increased bus service, pedestrian and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking
areas.
• There is a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and
associated businesses supported by both nearby residents and the larger Edmonds
community, and that attracts visitors from throughout the region.
• The downtown supports a mix of uses, including traditional commercial and multi family
development with new mixed-use development types. Single family neighborhoods are a
part of this mix of uses, and contribute to the choice of housing and character of
downtown.
• Opportunities for new development and redevelopment reinforce Edmonds’ attractive,
small town pedestrian-oriented character. Pedestrian-scale building height limits are an
important part of this quality of life, and remain in effect.
• Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of
historic structures in order to preserve these resources.
• Auto traffic is rerouted to minimize impact to residential neighborhoods.
C. Goals for the Downtown Waterfront Area. To achieve this vision, goals for the Downtown
Waterfront Activity Center include:
• Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated
businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a
destination for visitors from throughout the region.
• Continue to plan for and implement the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation
center at Pt. Edwards – pursuing the design, permitting, land acquisition and development
of the project. The completion of Edmonds Crossing will help address the competing
needs of three regional facilities (transportation, parks and open space – including the
Edmonds Marsh, and the Port of Edmonds) while providing opportunities for
redevelopment and linkage between downtown Edmonds and its waterfront.
• Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest
pedestrian links and pedestrian-oriented design elements, while protecting downtown’s
identity.
• Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and
complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at
downtown’s focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and
residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasize and plan for links
between the retail core and these supporting areas.
Packet Page 402 of 426
Land Use 27
• Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for
the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multi-family residential uses.
• Develop gateway/entrance areas into downtown which serve complementary purposes
(e.g. convenience shopping, community activities).
• Explore alternative development opportunities in the waterfront area, such as specifically
encouraging arts-related and arts-complementing uses.
D. Transportation. Primary goals of the City’s Downtown Waterfront Plan include integrating
the downtown core with the waterfront, improving pedestrian access and traffic circulation, and
encouraging mixed-use development. Current conditions limit the city's ability to achieve these
plan goals by making it difficult to move between the two areas, thereby minimizing the value of
the shoreline as a public resource and amenity while adversely affecting the potential for
redevelopment.
A number of studies and public involvement projects have been completed to determine how to
meet the variety of transportation needs that converge within Downtown Edmonds. Following an
initial 1992 Ferry Relocation Feasibility Study and a visioning focus group convened by
Edmonds’ Mayor in April 1992, the importance of the conflicting transportation needs
culminated in the City of Edmonds, Washington State Ferries, and Community Transit signing a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in November 1993. The MOU called for the cooperative
development of solutions to the conflicts between the City’s growth plans and ferry traffic in
particular. In response to that agreement, preliminary engineering and environmental analysis of
alternatives began in late 1993.
In 1994, the Edmonds City Council held public hearings on the possibility of relocating the
existing ferry terminal and incorporating a new terminal within a larger multimodal project. As a
result of the hearings, the Council expressed support for a regional multimodal facility. The
Council also approved the 1994 Edmonds Downtown Waterfront Plan which specifically
supported the facility’s location at Pt. Edwards.
Further environmental review and facility definition resulted in a recommendation that an
alternative site (other than the existing Main Street location) should be developed as a multimodal
facility serving ferry, rail, bus, pedestrian, and bicycle travel needs.
Several alternative sites for the relocated ferry terminal and the proposed multimodal center were
evaluated as part of the early environmental screening process. During this screening process,
federal, state, regional, and local regulatory agencies—including affected Tribes— provided input
regarding issues that could impact selecting reasonable alternatives.
Based on this extensive screening process, two alternatives were recommended for further
analysis in the Environmental Impact Statement process. A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) was issued on February 25, 1998, and the Final EIS was issued on November
10, 2004. Pt. Edwards is the preferred alternative for a multimodal terminal site.
In addition to the transportation benefits of moving the existing ferry terminal, a number of
redevelopment opportunities will result within the downtown waterfront area. These range from
park and public access improvements to opportunities for significant redevelopment and
connections between the waterfront and downtown.
Packet Page 403 of 426
28 Land Use
Edmonds Crossing. Edmonds Crossing is a multimodal transportation center proposed to be
constructed at Point Edwards, the former UNOCAL oil storage facility south of the Edmonds
Marina. This multimodal transportation center will provide the capacity to respond to growth
while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms of travel, including rail,
ferry, bus, bicycle, walking and ridesharing.
The project is supported by local, regional, and state plans, including the Puget Sound Regional
Council’s Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation and VISION 2020 plan; Washington
State Ferries’ (WSF) System Plan for 1999-2018; Snohomish County’s countywide
Transportation Plan; the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan; and the Port of Edmonds
Strategic Plan and Master Plan.
Edmonds Crossing will provide:
• Intersection improvements at Pine Street and SR-104;
• Interconnection of Amtrak service to Chicago and Vancouver, B.C., Sounder commuter
rail service between Everett and Seattle, and other regional transportation modes;
• Connections to the regional transit system with direct bus service to communities
throughout the urban growth area;
• Enhanced ability for people to rideshare, bicycle and walk to connect with travel
opportunities at the multimodal center;
• Improved safety and travel on Edmonds local streets and along SR-104 between the ferry
terminal and I-5.
• Linkage between Navy facilities at Everett and on the Kitsap peninsula.
The project includes:
• A ferry terminal;
• A train station;
Figure 9.
Integration of the
remaining ferry pier
structure into
surrounding parks will
be a key public benefit
and opportunity.
Packet Page 404 of 426
Land Use 29
• A transit center for bus and regional transit, as well as the opportunity for riders to
connect to downtown businesses via a local circulator service;
• The flexibility to operate the facility to respond to changing travel demands;
• Safety features including grade separation of train traffic from other modes of travel,
designated vehicle parking and holding areas, and improved passenger waiting areas.
Figure 10.
Edmonds
Crossing
“preferred
alternative”
from the 2004
FEIS.
Packet Page 405 of 426
30 Land Use
While the Edmonds Crossing project will directly benefit the transportation system, the project
will also provide significant benefits to downtown Edmonds. Completion of the project provides
an opportunity to redevelop the existing ferry terminal facilities and the related holding lanes in
the downtown area. Providing a connection from the new multimodal terminal to downtown
Edmonds will potentially bring more visibility and visitors to the downtown area.
E. Plan Policies and Implementation Strategy. The vision and goals for Downtown Waterfront
Activity Center are designed to present a coherent vision for future development in the area. To
implement this vision, a series of policies and an implementation strategy are intended to guide
future public and private actions.
Implementation Strategy. Key issues tied to the viability and health of the downtown
waterfront area include using the Edmonds Crossing project to help resolve transportation issues,
linking downtown with the waterfront, and taking advantage of redevelopment opportunities
arising from emerging trends and public investments.
The largest single factor affecting the downtown waterfront area is the timing and construction of
the Edmonds Crossing project. Because of this, a two-phased downtown waterfront
Packet Page 406 of 426
Land Use 31
redevelopment strategy is envisioned. The first phase includes actions taken before the existing
ferry terminal is relocated to the Pt. Edwards site, and is intended to include actions taken to
support ongoing redevelopment and arts-related improvements downtown. This phase will also
set the framework for subsequent redevelopment after the terminal’s relocation. The second phase
is aimed at comprehensive redevelopment to link the downtown with the waterfront, better utilize
shoreline resources, increase economic viability and provide the setting for a broad range of
community functions.
Short Term Actions. Short term actions are those actions that can take place prior to construction
of the Edmonds Crossing project, generally in the next 5-7 years.
1. Plan for the Edmonds Crossing project at Pt. Edwards which includes relocation of the
existing ferry terminal. Planning should also include reuse of the current ferry terminal and
related holding area.
2. Improve the existing downtown rail station between Dayton and Main Streets in order to
better accommodate inter-city passenger and commuter rail service, including provisions for bus
and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown. During
the short term planning period, evaluate the feasibility of retaining a commuter rail presence
downtown after the construction of Edmonds Crossing..
3. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area between SR-104 and the
railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property
acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land
use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). Although Amtrak and commuter rail service
will be included as a part of the Edmonds Crossing project, the City and transit service providers
should examine whether a commuter rail stop can be retained between Dayton and Main Streets
in order to provide improved service and stimulate potential redevelopment of the surrounding
area.
4. Upgrade secondary downtown streets for pedestrians. Implement the city’s public urban
design plan and street tree plan while expanding public amenities and streetscape improvements
in areas where these do not already exist. These improvements are particularly needed along
Main and Dayton Streets in the area between downtown and the waterfront in order to improve
pedestrian connections between downtown and the waterfront area. Pedestrian improvements
should be combined with traffic improvement projects where applicable.
5. Continue to promote shoreline management and public access to the city’s beaches,
parks, and walkways.
6. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from
Brackett’s Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate
recreation and marina functions into the long term plan.
7. Work with the Senior Center to plan for long term needs for the senior center facilities
and programs.
8. Encourage a variety of housing to be developed as part of new development and
redevelopment of downtown properties. Housing should be provided to serve a diverse
community, including single family homes, multi family apartments and condominiums, housing
as part of mixed use developments, and housing connected with live/work developments that
Packet Page 407 of 426
32 Land Use
could also encourage an arts-oriented community in the downtown area. A special focus for arts-
supporting live/work arrangements could be in the corridor and nearby residential areas linking
downtown with the Edmonds Center for the Arts.
9. Begin improvements to mitigate ferry terminal traffic (and other traffic) increases, as
envisioned in the Edmonds Crossing project and the transportation element of the comprehensive
plan.
10. Develop “gateways” at key entrances to the downtown area which enhance the identity
and sense of place for downtown. Gateways should signal that visitors are entering downtown
Edmonds, and should include elements such as public art, landscaping, signage and directional
(“way-finding”) aids.
Long Term Actions. Long term actions are those actions that can take place during or after
construction of the Edmonds Crossing project, generally in the next 7-20 years.
1. Complete a multi modal transportation center at Point Edwards for:
• Rail (inter-city and commuter)
• Ferry
• Park & Ride/Auto
• Bus
• Pedestrian and shuttle connections to other features and amenities.
2. Complete redevelopment of the Point Edwards site consistent with an overall master plan
that provides for commercial or mixed use development compatible with the Edmonds Crossing
project.
3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development.
4. Continue to protect and enhance existing wetlands and continue to develop supporting
non-intrusive interpretive trails and exhibits.
5. Continue development of a “necklace” of shoreline parks with improvements, focusing
on missing links in the park and walkway system. Retain and expand existing parks, providing
linkages whenever property acquisitions or easements become available for public use.
6. Encourage the development of centralized parking facilities as part of redevelopment
projects. Under the right circumstances, these types of facilities can provide an efficient
mechanism for consolidating expensive parking improvements while freeing up land for more
intensive and desirable uses that support local housing, commercial, and pedestrian activities.
Public/private partnerships should be explored when the opportunity arises, both in private and
public projects (e.g. the commuter rail station downtown). Centralized parking facilities could be
built as part of a master-planned mixed-use development.
7. Redevelop the existing ferry terminal site at the base of Main Street according to a master
plan after the existing ferry terminal has been relocated to Point Edwards. This is a unique
location, situated in the midst of a continuous park and beach setting, and provides opportunities
for public/private partnerships. Ideas to be pursued include public “festival” entertainment or
activity space, visitor moorage, park and public walkways, and other uses that would encourage
this as to become a destination drawing people from south along the waterfront and eastward up
Packet Page 408 of 426
Land Use 33
into downtown. Redevelopment of this area should be done in a manner that is sensitive to and
enhances the views down Main Street and from the adjoining parks and public areas.
8. Redevelop the area from the east side of SR-104 to the railroad tracks, from Harbor
Square to Main Street, according to a mixed use master plan. This area could provide a significant
opportunity for public/private partnerships. Under the right circumstances, consolidated parking
or a pedestrian crossing to the waterfront could be possible as part of a redevelopment project.
Every opportunity should be taken to improve the pedestrian streetscape in this area in order to
encourage pedestrian activity and linkages between downtown and the waterfront. Uses
developed along public streets should support pedestrian activity and include amenities such as
street trees, street furniture, flowers and mini parks. Main and Dayton Streets should receive
special attention for public art or art integrated into private developments to reinforce the visual
arts theme for downtown. Redevelopment of this area should also take advantage of the ability to
reconfigure and remove the ferry holding lanes paralleling SR-104 once the Edmonds Crossing
project is developed.
9. Support redevelopment efforts that arise out of planning for the long term needs of the
senior center. These plans should reinforce the center’s place in the public waterfront, linking the
facility to the walkways and parks along the shoreline.
10. New development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be
designed to meet overall design objectives and the intent of the various “districts” described for
the downtown area.
Downtown Waterfront Plan Policies. The following policies are intended to achieve the goals
for the downtown waterfront area:
E.1. Ensure that the downtown waterfront area continues – and builds on – its function as a
key identity element for the Edmonds community.
E.2. Future development along the waterfront should support the continuation and compatible
design of three regional facilities: Edmonds Crossing at Pt. Edwards; the Port of Edmonds and its
master plan; and the regional parks, beaches and walkways making up the public shoreline.
E.3. Utilize the Point Edwards site to its best community and regional potential by developing
a multimodal transit center with compatible development in the surrounding area. In addition to
the regional benefits arising from its multi modal transportation function, an essential community
benefit is in removing intrusive ferry traffic from the core area which serves to visually and
physically separate downtown from the waterfront.
E.4. Establish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides convenient
transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians and bicycle riders and makes
Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be
planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds – such as grade separation/safety
concerns and conflicts with other regional facilities – while providing the community with unique
transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community.
E.5. Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by encouraging mixed-use
development and pedestrian-oriented amenities and streetscape improvements, particularly along
Packet Page 409 of 426
34 Land Use
Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements
found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown
Area. Pursue redevelopment of SR-104 and the existing holding lanes once the ferry terminal
moves to Point Edwards.
E.6. Enhance Edmonds’ visual identity by continuing its pedestrian-scale of downtown
development, enhancing its shoreline character, and protecting and building on the strong visual
quality of the “5th and Main” core.
E.7. Improve traffic conditions by removing ferry traffic impacts from the downtown core.
E.8. Improve and encourage economic development opportunities by providing space for local
businesses and cottage industries and undertaking supporting public improvement projects. Of
particular significance is the enhancement of economic development opportunities resulting from
the Edmonds Crossing project and the enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water-oriented
destination.
E.9. Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park
settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. Improve public
access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade along
the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and
Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development.
E.10. Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring improved bus service, pedestrian
and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas.
E.11. Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and
associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community,
downtown commercial activity and visitors from throughout the region.
E.12. Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial, and
cultural activities.
E.13. Support the development and retention of significant public investments in the downtown
waterfront area, including government and cultural facilities that help draw residents and visitors
to downtown.
E.14. Encourage opportunities for new development and redevelopment which reinforce
Edmonds’ attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Provide incentives to encourage
adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these
resources. These historic structures are a key component of the small town character of Edmonds
and it’s economic viability. Height limits that reinforce and require pedestrian-scale development
are an important part of this quality of life, and should be implemented through zoning
regulations and design guidelines.
E.15. Provide greater residential opportunities and personal services within the downtown,
especially to accommodate the needs of a changing population.
E.16. Provide for the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas.
Packet Page 410 of 426
Land Use 35
E.17. Provide pedestrian-oriented amenities for citizens and visitors throughout the downtown
waterfront area, including such things as:
• Weather protection,
• Street trees and flower baskets,
• Street furniture,
• Public art and art integrated into private developments,
• Pocket parks,
• Signage and other way-finding devices,
• Restrooms.
E.18. Strive for the elimination of overhead wires and poles whenever possible.
E.19. Coordinate new building design with old structure restoration and renovation.
E.20. Develop sign regulations that support the pedestrian character of downtown, encouraging
signage to assist in locating businesses and public and cultural facilities while discouraging
obtrusive and garish signage which detracts from downtown pedestrian and cultural amenities.
E.21. Provide lighting for streets and public areas that is designed to promote comfort, security,
and aesthetic beauty.
E.22. Building design should discourage automobile access and curb cuts that interfere with
pedestrian activity and break up the streetscape. Encourage the use of alley entrances and
courtyards to beautify the back alleys in the commercial and mixed use areas in the downtown
area.
Downtown Waterfront Districts. In addition to the goals and policies for the downtown
waterfront area, the Comprehensive Plan Map depicts a number of districts in the downtown
waterfront area. These districts are described below.
Retail Core. The area immediately surrounding the fountain at 5th and Main and extending along
Main Street and Fifth Avenue is considered the historic center of Edmonds and building heights
shall be pedestrian in scale and compatible with the historic character of this area. To encourage a
vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to
accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses and the entry situated at street level. Uses are
encouraged to be retail-compatible (i.e. retail or compatible service – e.g. art galleries,
restaurants, real estate sales offices and similar uses that provide storefront windows and items for
sale to the public that can be viewed from the street). The street front façades of buildings must
provide a high percentage of transparent window area and pedestrian weather protection along
public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian-scale design features,
differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. Buildings
Packet Page 411 of 426
36 Land Use
situated around the fountain square must be orientated to the fountain and its associated
pedestrian area.
Arts Center Corridor. The corridor along 4th Ave N between the retail core and the Edmonds
Center for the Performing Arts. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be
designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses,
with commercial entries being located at street level. Building design and height shall be
compatible with the goal of creating a pedestrian oriented arts corridor while providing incentives
for the adaptive reuse of existing historic structures. Building entries for commercial buildings
must provide pedestrian weather protection. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian-
scale design features, differentiating the lower floor from the upper floors of the building. The
design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual
business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the
public sidewalk. The streetscape should receive special attention, using trees, landscaping, and
public art to encourage pedestrian activity. Private development projects should also be
encouraged to integrate art into their building designs. Where single family homes still exist in
this area, development regulations should allow for “live-work” arrangements where the house
can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Uses supporting the arts
center should be encouraged – such as restaurants, cafés, galleries, live/work use arrangements,
and B&Bs.
Downtown Mixed Commercial. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be
designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses.,
with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building
heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first
floor of buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design
guidelines should provide for pedestrian-scale design features, differentiating the lower,
commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces
must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with
individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of a
property adjoins a residentially-designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial
street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this
area, development regulations should allow for “live-work” arrangements where the house can
accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses.
Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required
(i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between).
Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed
Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian-
friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from
upper building levels.
Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR-104 and the railroad, including Harbor
Square, the Edmonds Shopping Center (former Safeway site), and extending past the Commuter
Rail parking area up to Main Street. This area is appropriate for design-driven master planned
development which provides for a mix of uses and takes advantage of its strategic location
between the waterfront and downtown. The location of existing taller buildings on the waterfront,
and the site's situation at the bottom of “the Bowl,” could enable a design that provides for higher
buildings outside current view corridors. Any redevelopment in this area should be oriented to the
street fronts, and provide pedestrian-friendly walking areas, especially along Dayton and Main
Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad side of the properties, since this is
Packet Page 412 of 426
Land Use 37
an area that provides a “first impression” of the city from railroad passengers and visitors to the
waterfront. Art work, landscaping, and modulated building design should be used throughout any
redevelopment project.
Shoreline Commercial. The waterfront, west of the railroad tracks between the public beaches
and the Port (currently zoned CW). Consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, this
area should allow a mix of public uses, supporting commercial uses, and water-oriented and
water-dependent uses. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian
scale development while providing incentives to encourage public view corridors. Roof and
building forms should be an important consideration in design guidelines for this area, because of
its high sensitivity and proximity to public open spaces. Redevelopment should result in singular,
landmark buildings of high quality design which take advantage of the visibility and physical
environment of their location, and which contribute to the unique character of the waterfront.
Pedestrian amenities and weather protection must be provided for buildings located along public
walkways and street fronts.
Master Plan Development. The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach, including the Port of
Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is governed by master
plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as described in
an FEIS issued on November 10, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City's
Shoreline Master Program, as it applies.
Downtown Convenience Commercial. This is the south end of 5th Ave, south of Walnut.
Commercial uses would be required on the first floor, but auto-oriented uses would be permitted
in addition to general retail and service uses. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces
should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial
uses. Weather protection would still be required, but to a lesser degree than the retail core and
only when the building was adjacent to the sidewalk. Height and design of buildings shall
conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. When the rear of a
property adjoins a residentially-designated property, floor area that is located behind the
commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use.
Planned Residential-Office. Several properties lie along the railroad on the west side of Sunset
Ave between existing commercial zoning and Edmonds Street. This area is appropriate for small-
scale development which provides for a mix of limited office and residential uses which provide a
transition between the more intensive commercial uses along Main Street and the residential uses
along Sunset Ave. Because the area of this designation is located adjacent to commercial
development to the south, the railroad to the west, and is near both multiple family and single-
family residential development, this area should act as a transition between theses uses. Building
design for this area should be sensitive to the surrounding commercial, multiple family and
single-family character.
Packet Page 413 of 426
38 Land Use
Downtown Design Objectives. As a companion to the districts outlined above, general design
objectives are included for the downtown waterfront area. These objectives are intended to
encourage high quality, well designed projects to be developed in the downtown waterfront area
that reflect the values of the citizens of Edmonds.
1. SITE DESIGN
The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral
part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and
site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential
negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district
and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment.
Vehicular Access and Parking
a. Minimize the number of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto
safety by reducing the number of potential points of conflict. When alleys are present, these are
the preferred method of providing vehicular access to a property and should be used unless there
is no reasonable alternative available.
b. Design site access and circulation routes with pedestrians’ comfort and ease of access in mind.
c. Provide adequate parking for each development, but keep cars from interfering with the
pedestrian streetscape.
d. In the Retail Core, adopt a “park and walk” policy to reinforce pedestrian safety and ease of
access. Within the Retail Core, new curb cuts should be discouraged and there should be no
requirement to provide on-site parking.
e. Create parking lots and building service ways that are efficient and safe for both automobiles
and pedestrians, but that do not disrupt the pedestrian streetscape.
f. Provide safe routes for disabled people.
Pedestrian Access and Connections
a. Improve streetscape character to enhance pedestrian activity in downtown retail, general
commercial, and residential areas.
b. Improve pedestrian access from the street by locating buildings close to the street and
pedestrian sidewalks, and defining the street edge. Cross walks at key intersections should be
accentuated by the use of special materials, signage or paving treatments.
c. In all of the retail and commercial downtown districts, pedestrian access to
buildings should be maximized, enabling each retail or commercial space at
street level to be directly accessed from the sidewalk.
d. Encourage the use of mass transit by providing easy access to pleasant
waiting areas.
Building Entry Location
a. Create an active, safe and lively street-edge.
b. Create a pedestrian friendly environment.
c. Provide outdoor active spaces at the entry to retail/commercial uses.
d. Commercial building entries should be easily recognizable and oriented to
the pedestrian streetscape by being located at sidewalk grade.
Building Setbacks
a. Provide for a human, pedestrian-friendly scale for
downtown buildings.
Packet Page 414 of 426
Land Use 39
b. Create a common street frontage view with enough repetition to tie each site to its neighbor.
c. Provide enough space for wide, comfortable and safe pedestrian routes to encourage travel by
foot.
d. Create public spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and encourage outdoor
interaction.
Building/Site Identity
a. Do not use repetitive, monotonous building forms and massing in large mixed use or
commercial projects.
b. Improve pedestrian access and way-finding by providing variety in building forms, color,
materials and individuality of buildings.
c. Retain a connection with the scale and character of the Downtown Edmonds through the use of
similar materials, proportions, forms, masses or building elements.
d. Encourage new construction to use design elements tied to historic forms or patterns found in
downtown.
Weather Protection
a. Provide a covered walkway for pedestrians
traveling along public sidewalks in
downtown.
b. Protect shoppers and residents from rain or
snow.
c. Provide a covered waiting area and
walkway for pedestrians entering a building,
coming from parking spaces and the public
sidewalk.
Lighting
a. Provide adequate illumination in all areas used by pedestrians, including building entries,
walkways, bus stops, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces to ensure a feeling of
security.
b. Special attention should be paid to providing adequate public lighting to encourage and support
nighttime street activity and safety for pedestrians.
c. Minimize potential for light glare to reflect or spill off-site.
d. Create a sense of welcome and activity.
Signage
a. Protect the streetscape from becoming cluttered.
b. Minimize distraction from the overuse of advertisement elements.
c. Provide clear signage to identify each distinct property or business and
to improve orientation and way-finding downtown.
d. Use graphics or symbols to reduce the need to have large letters.
e. Lighting of signs should be indirect or minimally backlit to display
lettering and symbols or graphic design instead of broadly lighting the
face of the sign.
f. Signage and other way-finding methods should be employed to assist
citizens and visitors in finding businesses and services.
g. Signage should be given special consideration when it is consistent with or contributes to the
historic character of sites on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places.
Packet Page 415 of 426
40 Land Use
Site Utilities, Storage,
Trash and Mechanical
a. Hide unsightly utility boxes, outdoor storage of equipment, supplies, garbage, recycling and
composting.
b. Minimize noise and odor.
c. Minimize visual intrusion.
d. Minimize need for access/paving to utility areas
Art and Public Spaces
a. Public art and amenities such as mini parks, flower baskets, street furniture, etc., should be
provided as a normal part of the public streetscape. Whenever possible, these elements should be
continued in the portion of the private streetscape that adjoins the public streetscape.
b. Art should be integrated into the design of both public and private developments, with
incentives provided to encourage these elements.
c. In the Arts Center Corridor, art should be a common element of building design, with greater
design flexibility provided when art is made a central feature of the design.
2. BUILDING FORM
Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms,
minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance
with policies in the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building
entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of
Edmonds character and urban form.
Height
a. Maintain the human, pedestrian scale and character of historic Edmonds.
b. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings. Unless more specific provisions
are contained in the descriptions for specific downtown districts, buildings shall be generally two
stories in exterior appearance, design and character. However, incentives or design standards may
be adopted which are consistent with the pedestrian scale of downtown Edmonds and which
allow for additional height that does not impact the generally two-story pedestrian-scale
appearance of the public streetscape. Note that the Downtown Master Plan district described on
pages 36-37 could allow a design which provides for higher buildings outside current view
corridors.
c. Preserve public view corridors along east-west downtown streets – such as Main Street and
Dayton Street – that afford views to the mountains and Puget Sound to the west.
Massing
a. Large building masses shall be avoided in the downtown waterfront activity center. Large
building masses should be subdivided vertically and/or horizontally to replicate the smaller scale
streetscape elements found along downtown’s pedestrian streets.
b. Require human scale elements in building design that reinforce the difference between the
pedestrian streetscape and the upper levels of a building.
c. Use combinations of other techniques, such as roof and wall modulation or combinations of
different wall materials with windows and trim, to break up apparent building masses into smaller
elements. When the size or configuration of a site does not lend itself to varying building mass,
these alternative techniques should be employed to obtain a pedestrian-friendly result.
Packet Page 416 of 426
Land Use 41
Roof Modulation
a. Use combinations of roof types and decorative elements such as parapets or architectural
detailing to break up the overall massing of the roof and add interest to its shape and form.
b. Create and reinforce the human scale of the building.
c. Use roof forms to identify different programs or functional areas within the building.
d. Provide ways for additional light to enter the building.
e. Encourage alternate roof treatments that improve and add interest to building design. Features
such as roof gardens, terraces, and interesting or unique architectural forms can be used to
improve the view of buildings from above as well as from the streetscape.
Wall Modulation
a. Create a pedestrian scale appropriate to Edmonds.
b. Break up large building masses and provide elements that accentuate the human scale of a
facade.
c. Avoid blank, monotonous and imposing building facades.
d. Design the building to be compatible with the surrounding built environment.
e. Encourage designs that let more light and air into the building.
3. BUILDING FAÇADE
Building facade guidelines ensure that the exterior of buildings, the portion of buildings that
defines the character and visual appearance of a place, is of high quality and demonstrates the
strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds.
Facade Requirements
a. Improve the pedestrian environment in the Downtown retail/commercial area by differentiating
the pedestrian-oriented street level of buildings from upper floors.
b. Ensure diversity in design.
c. Reinforce historic building patterns found in Downtown Edmonds.
d. Provide a human scale streetscape, breaking up long façades into defined forms that continue a
pattern of individual and distinct tenant spaces in commercial and mixed use areas.
e. Improve the visual and physical character and quality of Downtown Edmonds.
f. Create individual identity in buildings.
Window Variety and Articulation
a. Windows help define the scale and character of the building. In the
retail and mixed commercial districts, building storefronts must be
dominated by clear, transparent glass windows that allow and
encourage pedestrians to walk past and look into the commercial space.
b. Upper floors of buildings should use windows as part of the overall
design to encourage rhythm and accents in the façade.
Building Façade Materials
A. The materials that make up the exterior facades of a building also
help define the scale and style of the structure and provide variation in
the facade to help reduce the bulk of larger buildings. From the foundation to the roof eaves, a
variety of building materials can reduce the scale and help define a building’s style and allows the
design of a building to respond to its context and client’s needs. It is particularly important to
differentiate the lower, street level of a building from the upper floors that are less in the
pedestrian’s line of sight.
Packet Page 417 of 426
42 Land Use
Accents/Colors/Trim
A. Applied ornament and architectural detail, various materials and
colors applied to a façade as well as various decorative trim/surrounds
on doors and windows provide variation in the scale, style and
appearance of every building facade. Awnings and canopies also add to
the interest and pedestrian scale of downtown buildings. The objective
is to encourage new development that provides:
• Compatibility with the surrounding environment,
• Visual interest and variety in building forms,
• Reduces the visual impacts of larger building masses,
• Allows identity and individuality of a project within a neighborhood.
Packet Page 418 of 426
Packet Page 419 of 426
Packet Page 420 of 426
Packet Page 421 of 426
Packet Page 422 of 426
Packet Page 423 of 426
Packet Page 424 of 426
Packet Page 425 of 426
Packet Page 426 of 426