Loading...
2009.04.28 CC Agenda Packet              AGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds ______________________________________________________________ APRIL 28, 2009   6:45 p.m. - Interview candidates for the Architectural Design Board and Historic Preservation Commission. Interviews will be held in the Jury Meeting Room and are open to the public. 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute 1. Approval of Agenda   2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items   A. Roll Call   B. AM-2243 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2009.   C. AM-2249 Approval of claim checks #111215 through #111327 for $650,479.28 dated April 23, 2009.  Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #47999 through #48038 for the pay period April 1, through April 15, 2009 for $825,852.28.   D. AM-2246 Approval of the Washington State Liquor Control Board March 2009 list of businesses requesting renewal of their liquor licenses.   E. AM-2238 Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report – April, 2009.   F. AM-2239 Report on final construction costs for the Electrical Improvement Project and Council acceptance of project.   G. AM-2247 Approval of payment in the amount of $1,111.41 to Landau Associates related to environmental assessment of the Old Milltown courtyard site.   H. AM-2240 Application for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program.   I. AM-2237 Proclamation in honor of Building Safety Week, May 3 - 9, 2009.   3. AM-2235 (10 Minutes) Edmonds Business Story: Garden Gear.   4. AM-2245 (10 Minutes) Presentation on Edmonds Backyard Wildlife Habitat Project.   5. AM-2241 (15 Minutes) Sustainability programs and strategies at Edmonds Community College.   6. AM-2214 (30 Minutes) Public comment regarding proposal to ban single use plastic checkout bags in Edmonds.   Packet Page 1 of 148 7. AM-2244 (30 Minutes) Public comment on draft levy proposal and draft Resolution regarding 2009 property tax levy.   8.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed record Review or as Public Hearings.   9. AM-2242 (30 Minutes) Discussion and potential action on temporary buildings/uses Ordinance.   10. (15 Minutes)Council reports on outside committee/board meetings.   11. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments   12. (15 Minutes)Council Comments   Adjourn   Packet Page 2 of 148 AM-2243 2.B. Approve 04-21-09 City Council Meeting Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2009. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 04-21-09 Draft City Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 09:21 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 11:03 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:11 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase  Started On: 04/23/2009 09:20 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 3 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES April 21, 2009 At 6:15 p.m., Mayor Haakenson announced that the City Council would be meeting in executive session on legal advice regarding pending litigation. He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 45 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Haakenson, Councilmembers Orvis, Peterson, Olson, Wambolt and Bernheim. Others present were City Attorney Scott Snyder and City Clerk Sandy Chase. The executive session concluded at 6:55 p.m. The regular Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor D. J. Wilson, Council President Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember Steve Bernheim, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember Strom Peterson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief Al Compaan, Police Chief Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development Director Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Kathleen Junglov, Finance Director Debi Humann, Human Resources Director Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Haakenson requested the addition of “Receipt of Fire District 1 Service Proposal and Authorization for Mayor and Staff to Negotiate with District” to the Consent Calendar as Item L. He relayed Council President Wilson’s request to add a report from one of the labor unions as Item 4A. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Wambolt requested Item F be removed from the Consent Agenda and Councilmember Bernheim requested Item E be removed. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: Packet Page 4 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 2 A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 7, 2009. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #110980 THROUGH #111107 FOR $172,451.23 DATED 04/09/2009, AND #111108 THROUGH #111214 FOR $361,887.04 DATED 04/16/2009. D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM BRIAN GOODNIGHT ($909.82), AND PETER & KATHY NWOKOBIA ($2,434.90). G. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES G. MURPHY TO SELL SURPLUS CITY VEHICLES AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. H. RENEW INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY REGIONAL DRUG TASK FORCE. I. INTERFUND LOAN ACTIVITY. J. ORDINANCE NO. 3733 AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 3685 TO ESTABLISH A NEW EFFECTIVE DATE FOR AN INCREASE IN THE SALARY OF THE MAYOR (DELAY THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SALARY INCREASE). K. REVISION TO EDMONDS MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 5 - ORDINANCE NO. 3734 CONCERNING ADOPTION OF CERTAIN CRIMINAL OFFENSES CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE CRIMINAL STATUTES. L. RECEIPT OF FIRE DISTRICT 1 SERVICE PROPOSAL AND AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR AND STAFF TO NEGOTIATE WITH DISTRICT ITEM E: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN A RIGHT OF ENTRY AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT WITH HORIZON BANK FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING AND REPLACING FRONTAGE TREES ALONG DAYTON STREET. Councilmember Bernheim recalled his previous concern that the last 10-20 trees planted downtown did not meet the minimum requirement of the Street Tree Plan and questioned whether the Horizon Bank replacement trees also would not meet those requirements. Public Works Director Noel Miller explained the Parks Department, who plants the trees, indicated the guidelines in the Street Tree Plan with regard to trees were being followed although there had been exceptions. Councilmember Bernheim pointed neither the trees in front of the Bank of Washington, the trees on both side of the street at Old Mill Town, the trees in front of the Gregory nor the replacement trees west of the Bank of Washington on Dayton Street complied with the Street Tree Plan. Mr. Miller assured staff was doing its best to get as big a tree as possible planted in the City right-of-way. Councilmember Bernheim requested a presentation from the Parks Department regarding compliance with the Street Tree Plan. Council President Wilson shared Councilmember Bernheim’s concerns that the trees planted recently did not comply with the Street Tree Plan adopted in 2002. Mr. Miller clarified the Street Tree Plan was updated in 2006. Council President Wilson expressed his preference to delay removal of any trees until larger trees could be planted or the Street Tree Plan revised to allow the smaller trees. COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON, TO HOLD OFF CUTTING THE TREES UNTIL A PRESENTATION WAS MADE BY THE PARKS DEPARTMENT ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE WITH THE STREET TREE PLAN OR A MODIFICATION WAS MADE TO THE STREET TREE PLAN. Packet Page 5 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 3 Councilmember Wambolt explained the trees were being removed because roots uplifted the sidewalk creating a safety hazard and placing the City at risk for people tripping and falling. He did not object to planting smaller trees, pointing out they grew very quickly. He noted the City did not provide the trees, they were provided by the contractor. Council President Wilson recognized the City incurred liability as a result of the trees and needed to cut them down or identify the money to fix the sidewalk. Mayor Haakenson pointed out the trees were being removed, not cut down. He noted it was not a matter of fixing the sidewalk; the tree must be removed to prevent the roots from continuing to damage the sidewalks. Mayor Haakenson asked Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh to address the caliper of trees that had been planted recently. Mr. McIntosh acknowledged the trees had been less than 3-inch minimum stated in the Street Tree Plan. He explained the trees were being planted in a highly congested utility area and a larger caliper tree had a larger root ball and a larger hole required moving more utilities. Mayor Haakenson noted Mr. McIntosh’s explanation was the presentation Councilmember Bernheim had requested. Councilmember Bernheim pointed out the public never had an opportunity to debate that issue and the Street Tree Plan was a very important aspect of marketing downtown as a pedestrian friendly, cool shaded area. He noted the Street Tree Plan did not allow planting of smaller trees in utility corridors and in fact required a 3-inch caliper. He summarized when trees were removed and replaced, the public expected the replacement trees to comply with the Street Tree Plan and not an explanation of why they did not. Mr. McIntosh assumed the Street Tree Plan included the ability for staff to make judgment calls in this situation. Councilmember Bernheim suggested the Street Tree Plan be amended to allow smaller trees in some areas of downtown. Councilmember Wambolt agreed the Plan should match the practice. He clarified the intent was not to remove large trees and replace them with large trees because the existing trees were too big and caused damage to the sidewalks. He referred to the trees on Dayton east of 5th that were planted in the past four years and were growing rapidly. Mayor Haakenson advised the roots of the trees that have been planted downtown for many years grown horizontally and cause damage to the sidewalks. The roots of the trees being planted now grow down to avoid damaging the sidewalks. He acknowledged it may look bad when a large tree was removed and replaced with a smaller tree, recognizing that sacrifice was sometimes necessary. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO AMEND THE CODE TO ALLOW 2-INCH CALIPER TREES. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Council President Wilson suggested Councilmember Bernheim withdraw his motion and delay this item to schedule Council review of the Street Tree Plan. COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Council President Wilson scheduled review of the Street Tree Plan on the May 26 agenda. ITEM F: AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN THE ESPERANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. Councilmember Wambolt explained he pulled this item to highlight it for citizens, recalling there had been some concern that the fee in the fire service agreement with Esperance was too low. He recognized staff for the excellent job they did completing a new agreement that increased the existing fee by Packet Page 6 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 4 $435,000. He noted this was not a windfall to the budget as Fire Chief Tomberg had anticipated this change although it was approximately $100,000 more than budgeted. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 2F. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PRESENTATION ON LEVY Mayor Haakenson explained as reported two weeks ago, the 2009 budget situation was resolved for the near term with budget cuts previously announced, furloughs agreed to by City employees and other adjustments he outlined in his last report. This was predicated on no further declines in 2009 revenue streams. He emphasized the City would not have reached this point without the agreement by all City employees on furloughs or other give-backs. The City’s employees agreed to these pay losses in order to protect less senior employees from layoffs; they care about the City and its residents. He cautioned simply because a way was found to survive the immediate crisis for 2009, next year and the following years would bring a far worse financial situation. He recognized the Council was aware of this and thanked them for their plan to go to the voters in November with a levy request. He explained the Council chose this course of action during the budget process last November rather than make serious budget cuts at that time. Unfortunately, many of the cuts that were averted at that time have been made this year anyway in order to make up for lost revenue due to the economy. The Council affirmed their intension to move forward with a levy several times this year and the recent four-week exercise with the Citizen Levy Review Committee (CLRC) was the first step in that process. He thanked Council President Wilson for the effort and hours he put into that exercise. While City staff cannot lobby on behalf of the levy, they play an integral part in the process and did an amazing amount of work in preparation as well as added four more night meetings to their already full schedules. He also thanked the 60+ citizens who gave up four nights to attend the meetings to grasp the situation in a short timeframe and for taking an interest in the City and how it operates. When asked by Council President Wilson to identify a dollar amount needed for the levy, staff took many things into consideration. They saw their task as outlining what was needed to operate the City for the next five years. They did not seek any new employees or new programs, only maintaining the existing provision of services. Staff viewed this as an operation levy; not exciting but basic. The first effort was to increase the ending cash balance to a level acceptable by normal accounting standards; approximately one month’s worth of cash to pay bills, an amount the City has not had in decades. Next, consideration was given to items and personnel cuts from the budget over the past nine years that were still necessary for the provision of City services in the future. Staff also considered what was new that would benefit in the provision of City services; all the new items were in the area of Information Technology (IT). As past budgets have been cut, a long list of IT needs have also not been included in the budget. The amount staff identified was $4.5 million which was the amount the CLRC used as a starting point. This amount would see the City through approximately 2016. He acknowledged the Levy Work Groups identified different scenarios, taking the City through different years. Mayor Haakenson explained once the levy work groups made their reports and the Council selected a levy amount, staff would work with that number to itemize what will be included in the levy. Staff will also develop a list of cuts if the levy were to fail. Mayor Haakenson commented there appeared to be some confusion by the levy work groups regarding what budget cuts would be made if a smaller levy amount were selected. He explained a smaller levy amount did not include budget cuts; it simply brought the recurring problem back at an earlier year, Packet Page 7 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 5 perhaps 2013 or 2014 rather than 2016. He summarized staff viewed this as an operational levy to allow the continued provision of essential City services through 2016. 4. PRESENTATION FROM CITIZEN LEVY REVIEW COMMITTEE Council President Wilson expressed his thanks to the Edmonds Beacon for allowing the teams from the Citizen Levy Review Committee (CLRC) space to present their views. He thanked Councilmember Wambolt for his active participation, as well as Councilmembers Peterson, Olson, Plunkett and Bernheim for their participation. Green Team Bruce Witenberg introduced the team members: Dianne Hanna, Kristiana Johnson, Ray Martin, Darlene McLellan, David Thorpe, Robert Van Tassal and Jim Young. He expressed their thanks to the Mayor, staff, Council President Wilson and Councilmember Wambolt for the enormous amount of work, time and effort providing information and documentation to the CLRC. Their team believes life as they know it in the City of Edmonds hangs in the balance. The City can no longer rely on doing business as usual if Edmonds kind of days are to continue and maintain the quality of life to which citizens are accustomed. They believe the time has come for the City Council to work together with the Mayor to solve the serious financial problems that threaten the City. The City Council needs to put aside politics, special interests and personal agendas and immediately begin a collaborative effort for the benefit of the community. That effort must begin without delay and begin work on an economic development plan for every geographic area of the City that will generate new sources of revenue. The City Council must seriously consider compromises on design guidelines, building heights, zoning and planning which will implement economic and revenue-generating growth. The Green Team believes the City needs to have a less parochial view and instead the City Council must create a more comprehensive citywide agenda. In order to thrive, Edmonds must have a change in its culture of thought. Seven members of the Green Team support a six-year levy proposal running through 2016 not to exceed $4.3 million per year. Member Ray Martin supports a maximum $3.35 million levy for 2 years. The Green Team does not propose additional budget cuts at this time but support the levy to maintain current levels of public safety, public assets, sense of community and quality of life. The entire team implores the City Council to work with the Mayor to immediately begin to develop and implement a plan to consider and capture all prudent revenue sources in order to avoid reductions in public safety services and parks, recreation and cultural services; pay of necessary capital improvements; create more effective City planning and streamline City processes; and enhance economic development. Team Member Kristiana Johnson raised a concern about the City’s transportation budget, indicating the proposed Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan identified capital needs that should not be ignored. The Green Team supports increasing the financial information available to the public and continuing to make it transparent which will enhance citizen support for the levy. He cautioned their support of the levy was not unconditional; they expect the City Council to unanimously support the levy. The Council’s unanimous support will send a message to the CLRC that their work was not in vain, to the community that the Council desires to be part of the solution and not perpetuate the economic problems, to citizens that financial sacrifice they are being asked to make by supporting the levy were recognized and that the financial sacrifice union and non-union employees made to preserve the City’s quality of life were recognized. They implored the Council to strive for unanimity in developing and implementing an economic development plan to increase revenue and preserve quality of life of this community. They recognized a levy was a short lifetime to accomplish this process. The time to change the culture of thought in the community begins tonight and they hoped the Council was up to the challenge. Packet Page 8 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 6 David Thorpe explained the Green Team came away with a stark understanding of the City’s financial situation. Without question, they believe revenue generation through economic development must be done by looking at creative ways to provide for ongoing City services, maintaining the infrastructure and funding capital projects. They urged the City to explore potential consolidations of some services through interlocal agreements with surrounding cities where feasible and effective. Public/private partnerships as well as non-profits should also be considered where prudent. The City must continue to expand applications for grants for infrastructure and capital improvements and reconsider a staff position that includes applying for grants. The City and staff have made positive steps and must continue the process of making economic development in the City more user friendly without advocating the necessary oversight such as tighter, cleaner, more clear codes, continued development of design guidelines and consideration of building heights, zoning and planning with fresh eyes. The City must enhance its major assets such as the waterfront and parks, recreation and cultural services without ignoring development in areas such as Five Corners, Firdale, Westgate, Highway 99 corridor, Perrinville and the hospital district. Through four meetings and a total of ten hours, all teams endorsed some type of levy. The Green Team saw the need for a new course. The culture of thought must change with regard to the budget, revenue generation, and expenditures. Citizens enjoy a unique quality of life in Edmonds but realize it does not come cheap. The Council must act in unity and immediately begin development of an economic plan for the City. The Council must be better at explaining cause and effect and communicate to citizens what services and jobs will be lost if the levy fails. The City is at a financial crossroads and needs vision and leadership. Blue Team Steve Burkett introduced the team members: Rick Bader, Wendy Harrison, Scott Hopper, Dave Page, Evan Pierce, Dave Vincent and Anne Sorley. He summarized the Blue Team recognized the City did not have an expenditure problem. The City was becoming too dependent on property taxes as a source of revenue, and they recommended diversifying revenue sources particularly from retail sales tax. Based on their review of financial and other information regarding the City’s current and projected financial status, they concluded the City did not have an excess expenditure problem; per capita expenditures were lower than the average of comparable cities in the region. Total City staffing is also below the average of other cities, lower than needed to provide the services the community desires. The Blue Team concluded there was a need for increased revenues to fund highest priority services and maintain prudent financial reserves but did not believe the proposed levy lid lift of $4.3 million was the appropriate response to the financial crisis. That amount represents approximately a 33% increase in the property taxes paid to the City and other agencies may also propose increases such as a proposed increase in the State sales tax. In the current financial environment, the Blue Team recommends a minimum amount of increased taxes to allow time to develop a more long lasting solution to the structural budget problem; a shorter timeframe to accomplish things the Green Team described. The Blue Team recommends a levy lid lift of $2 million be placed on the November ballot. They believed the smaller amount had a better chance of approval by voters and would allow the City to fund highest priority services through the next three years. The additional funding would also allow the City to maintain adequate reserves in these challenging financial times. Recognizing their proposal as a short term financial bandaid, they believed it was important to take this small step and use the breathing room to substantially change the way the City does business and manages it finances. The Blue Team recommended the Mayor, Council, staff and community accomplish the following specific goals during the next 18-24 months: 1. Adopt and implement a strategic plan for City government that outlines vision, priorities, and goals. Packet Page 9 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 7 2. Develop and maintain a long-range, six-year financial plan that supports the strategic plan that outlines projected revenues and expenditures and required cash balances and reserves. 3. Develop and implement a specific economic development plan to increase property tax and sales tax revenue generated in areas such as downtown and Highway 99. 4. Adopt financial policies that should include the six year financial plan, reserves and contingencies, CIP policies, and debt policies including practical limits. 5. Rebuild and maintain adequate General Fund reserves. 6. Pursue the Regional Fire Authority. 7. Periodically conduct a survey of residents’ satisfaction with City services and priorities. 8. Implement a performance management system that includes specific departmental outcomes and performance measures linked to the strategic plan. He summarized Edmonds citizens chose to live in Edmonds because they were attracted by its unique location and quality of life and understand the importance of quality City facilities and services to that quality of life. Citizens expect to pay City taxes comparable to other similarly attractive communities. He relayed their concern with the increasing dependence on residential property taxes to support City services. Currently property taxes comprise 41% of the City’s General Fund revenue; the 1% cap on property tax increases make it imperative to diversify the City’s revenue sources and develop alternatives such as sales tax. He pointed out Edmonds currently collected approximately $6 million in sales tax or $155/capita, substantially below the average city in the State. If Edmonds collected the average of other cities, approximately $1.8 million more revenue could be generated. He pointed out Edmonds property tax rate was 60% higher than Kirkland and Kirkland generates twice the sales tax, $6 million more than Edmonds. Grey Team Bill Keppler introduced the team members: John McGibbon, Michelle Ruis, Beverly Theunis, Steve Tholl and Dan White. They thanked the Council and staff who worked so assiduously to present documentation to the CLRC. In addition to attending the four meetings, team members spent in excess of 80 hours on research, looking at different demographic projections and conducting a great deal of statistical analysis. The Grey Team unanimously recommends a levy that would raise a certain amount per year for three years to help support the City’s operational mandates and ending balance requirements. The levy should result in a concomitant and manageable shortfall to be financed through other City revenue capabilities such as increased service user fees, service reductions, increased volunteerism and especially a new economic development plan. The tension between levy and shortfall amounts encourage citizens, City employees and Councilmembers to collaboratively and squarely face the basic problem of residential-based funding and deal with it creatively. By their analysis of the present City forecasts, the levy amount should be $3 million with stipulations for a sunset clause and no new programs. They recognized City budget shortages were not without context, such as the current national economy, tax revenue competition among levels of government and local voting history. Close citizen involvement should be ongoing via committee participation with the Mayor and City Council on budgetary plans and decisions. Efforts are needed to provide citizens with a better in-depth, local demographic comparisons and statistical analysis to base informative public dialogue on tax affordability and voting decisions. They agreed there was a substantial revenue shortfall and not a spending problem in the City. He provided a quote from Mark Twain, “we are stretching a gnat’s abdomen over a rain barrel.” Orange Team Eric Radcliffe introduced the team members: Natalie Shippen, Dick Van Hollebeke, Mark Porter, Don Hall, Janice Freeman and John Dewhirst. He relayed the majority opinion of the Orange Team, 6 of 7 votes, to recommend a $3.5 million levy be forwarded to the citizens of Edmonds in November 2009. The Orange Team recommendation is based on the premise that the City Council and the Mayor seriously commit the City’s resources to broaden the tax base of Edmonds. This effort must commence on or Packet Page 10 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 8 before July 2009 prior to putting the levy to a vote. Economic development needs to be improved in all geographic areas of Edmonds including Firdale, Highway 99, Five Corners, downtown core, Perrinville, Westgate, other new potential areas as well as redevelopment of the waterfront. Economic development shall focus on retail, office, arts, hospital/healthcare, and related facilities along with potential for light industry at the Port. If enacted, a minimum of $500,000 of the levy funds shall be used for proactive economic development activities to broaden the tax base in Edmonds. The one minority opinion on the Team recommended the Mayor and City Council keep the City’s annual budget at acceptable levels of revenues and expenditures. Bailing out the Mayor and Council encourages bad habits. The proposed expenditures do not include any items that look to the future, merely tread water for seven years. It takes a lot of brass for elected officials to ask residents for a property tax increase while not availing themselves of the full array of taxing tools. Pink Team Tim Jones introduced the team members: John Bennett, Dale Hoggins, Don Eager, Jill Gradwohl, and Marilyn Brown. They thanked the Council for the unique opportunity to understand the issues the City faces and staff for their effort in support of this process. The Pink Team agreed the biggest issue facing the City was revenue and property taxes would not solve that problem. Reducing non-mandatory services does not help and jeopardizes many of the reasons citizens moved here and stay here and can also affect the desire of others to locate here. In the short term the City needs to survive to another Edmonds kind of day. They unanimously recommended the Council put to the citizens a levy of $4 million for a period of six years. The Council and Mayor must explore additional sources of revenue focusing on economic development and appropriate fee increases. The levy should restore expected 2009 budget cuts including but not limited to the Senior Center and Yost Pool. The Pink Team did not support the introduction of gaming establishments as a means of revenue gain. The planned shortfall in the sixth year was left as a stick for the Mayor and Council to find funding alternatives. Improvements in the economy and increased City revenues did not relieve the City or Mayor from the burden of replacing the levy with other sources of revenue. Yellow Team Bea O’Rourke introduced the team members: Michael Bowman, Diane Buckshnis, Priya Cloutier, Daniel McMillin, Susan Phillips, Elizabeth Scott and Richard Senderoff. She relayed their thanks to staff for their hard work and time spent with the CLRC. The majority of the Yellow Team recommends a $3.7 million levy to fund the City through 2014 with the caveat that a Budget Planning Committee be formed within 60 days and their first meeting to occur within 90 days. The Committee should be comprised of 5- 7 citizens and at least 1 Councilmember and staff member as liaisons. They supported a levy but believe the Council must plan and develop and did not believe that would occur if the full levy were granted. The Budget Planning Committee would: 1. Evaluate non-revenue generating programs to determine whether they could become revenue generating or establish plans for making programs revenue generating. 2. Evaluate potential revenue generating programs. 3. Develop a comprehensive plan that supports existing businesses and brings new businesses to Edmonds to develop and increase the tax base. 4. Report to the Council on a quarterly basis to ensure transparency of the budget process. Daniel McMillin relayed the Yellow Team’s minority opinion by Elizabeth Scott who supported forming a Budget Planning Committee, stated raising taxes in whatever form takes a person’s hard-earned money which results in lower revenue because that person now had less to spend on items and services. A reduction in taxes results in economic growth as was seen in the 1920’s and 1980’s and in other countries such as New Zealand where a 50% reduction in property taxes in 1984 resulted in an immediate Packet Page 11 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 9 increase in tax revenue due to economic growth. Therefore cutting taxes, including property taxes, would be better for the City financially. Red Team Jim Crim introduced the team members: Kerry St. Clair-Ayers, Roger Hertrich, Dennis Lowenthal, Susan Paine, Walter Peale, and Tina Vincent. He emphasized the City did not have a spending crisis but was experiencing a revenue crisis. The City needed to increase revenues and give economic development more than lip service and do so quickly. Every program must be closely examined for the potential of increased revenue and every new revenue source must be aggressively pursued. During that period the City shall endeavor to create and implement new long and short term revenue production and all city programs evaluated for additional revenue sources to implement a sustainable future. Roger Hertrich presented the Red Team’s minority opinion. He expressed support for a levy of $1.1 million for each of 3 years for a total of $3.3 million to cover the revenue shortfall of $1.1 million on a temporary, limited basis and to make the levy saleable to the public. He pointed out because other agencies may be requesting increases and the current economy made residents hesitant to spend, a smaller amount and a shorter time period increased the possibility of approval. He recommended continued efforts to economize the City including the following service cuts: eliminate K9 police services, reduce the Park Director by half, transfer Stephen Clifton to Community Service Director, turn Yost Pool over to a non-profit organization, and eliminate the fiber optic consultant. Mr. Crim relayed the Red Team’s majority position as reported in the Edmonds Beacon, a levy for city operations in the amount of $4.5 million for a term of not less than 5 years. Purple Team Phil Lovell introduced the team members: Kathleen Dewhirst, Robert Freeman, Linda Lyshall, Denise Schaefer, Monda Van Hollebeke, and Judy Stead. The majority of the Purple Team supports the levy as outlined during the April 6 and 13th meetings and recommends next steps be taken toward an appropriate ballot measure in November 2009. They understand the proposal as described in its currently projected full amount of $4.3 million will help assure maintaining current levels of City facilities, departments, and services until 2016. The measure is also intended to restore a budgeting parameter recommended to the City toward maintaining an adequate cash balance at the end of each fiscal year. In addition, they requested the City Council develop a longer term vision for Edmonds with goals to achieve this vision that are fiscally sustainable and environmentally responsible; more specifically, that the budget makeup and particulars should be tied to the achievement of these goals toward fulfilling this vision. Such goals should include establishing a larger and more diverse tax base as well as other verifiable revenue generation programs. Although they understood that past property tax legislation in Washington and recessive economic conditions contributed to the current crisis mode, they believed the City was lacking proactive maintenance of consistent and unified fiscal planning and action. They recommended the Council focus more on the achievement and maintenance of a fiscally sustainable Edmonds to the benefit of all citizens and taxpayers. They recognized the largest and most sustainable tax base in the City was real estate and recommended developing and maintaining a more diversified tax base plus revenue generation vehicles to supplement this large residential base and thereby bring greater sustainability and predictability to the revenue side of the City’s budgeting cycles. As part of preparing for the upcoming levy vote, the Mayor and/or Council shall spell out in clear language the scope, cost basis and duration of what Edmonds will be losing should the levy vote fail. This information shall be promulgated to every voting citizen within the city and followed up with public informational meetings so that voters are well-informed prior to the November ballot. Packet Page 12 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 10 In the event the proposed levy includes budget cuts made since the start of fiscal year 2009, the scope and duration and those cuts shall be made clear to the voters ahead of the November ballot. He referred to an attachment that contained suggested immediate, short term and long term revenue generation potentials developed by the Purple Team for study and follow-up by the City. Council President Wilson commented the teams’ recommendations included two fundamental messages, 1) the need to pass a levy between $2 – $4.3 million, and 2) the Council should not dawdle in figuring out the City’s financial difficulties. He expressed his appreciation to the participants in the CLRC for their level of sincere engagement. He pointed out everyone who applied to participate on the CLRC was accepted and anyone who joined during the process was invited to participate. He summarized the recommendations did not reflect a hand picked opinion but represented the community’s viewpoint. Councilmember Wambolt echoed Council President Wilson’s comments. To those who believed the levy lid lift increase was only being sought because of the current economy, he clarified the problem should have been addressed at least two years ago. The actions Mayor Haakenson took on March 13 were to address the current economic situation. He referred to the recommendation by several groups that the City should pursue more revenue from sales tax, pointing out communities that typically collected more sales tax than Edmonds such as Lynnwood were also suffering in this economy. He agreed the City needed to expand the opportunity for sales tax but pointed out the City needed to take other actions as well. He referred to the sales tax, property tax, REET, etc. the City collected from Pt. Edwards, which illustrate the benefits of additional real estate development. He summarized the Council would work on identifying additional revenue but there was no easy solution. Councilmember Peterson thanked the 60+ people and staff for their time and effort. He agreed with Council President Wilson that the two themes were a levy of some size was needed and the Council and City government needed to identify long term solutions and diversification. He pointed out the City could not rely on short term gains or one time funds such as those provided by development of Pt. Edwards. A third common theme was transparency and ensuring what the Council did was out in the open and that there was a great deal of public participation; the CLRC was the first step in that effort. 4A. REPORT BY LABOR UNION Council President Wilson recalled he extended the offer to all bargaining units and non-represented employees to speak to the Council. Steve Harbinson, President, Edmonds Police Officers Association, expressed his thanks to the CLRC, noting Police Officers Association Vice President Linda Mack attended a majority of the meetings and he attended the final meeting. He agreed with the comments and recommendations of the CLRC teams, that action needed to be taken immediately. He relayed an often used phrase by Police Chief Compaan, “perception is reality,” commenting the following was the reality of the Edmonds Police Officers Association. Not only did Edmonds Officers agree to give some of their pay back to the City; several live in the City and will be impacted again by the levy. Officer safety was one of their biggest concerns; Edmonds has approximately 1.32 officers per 1,000. The standard from the National Police Chiefs Association is 2.0 officers per 1,000 and another standards used in Washington is 1.8 officers per 1,000. He pointed out response times would increase if police officers were cut, particularly if the levy did not pass. As an example, yesterday the Police Department was at basic minimum staffing due to training and was required to elicit help from Lynnwood because of a bank robbery and domestic violence situation that occurred simultaneously. Although Edmonds has a small town image, he noted the city has its share of criminal activity including two officers who were shot at last year. Packet Page 13 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 11 Officer Harbinson commented he had been employed by the City for 14 years but many officers have been with the City for 25-30+ years. He referred to missed opportunities in the past such as annexing the Aurora Village area that would have generated millions in taxes. He recommended streamlining building permits, commenting they often hear from businesses that want to locate in Edmonds but are frustrated with the amount of time and the cost to obtain permits. He recommended the City consider the potential purchase of the Fire Department by Fire District 1. If that action were taken, he recommended the furlough days be discontinued. Officer Harbinson recognized a levy was necessary to keep the City afloat, pointing out in the past 14 years the City had done nothing to promote new businesses. He recommended consideration be given to casinos, particularly if legislation is approved allowing cities to site casinos in certain zones. There is a casino approximately 85 feet from the city limits in Mountlake Terrace and the Police Department’s involvement with its patrons has been very limited. He acknowledged the popularity of casinos was diminishing and in the current economy, people were not spending money at casinos at past rates. He recommended the City “quit spending money like a drunken sailor,” pointing out the City’s purchase of land in front of Quizno’s for approximately $250,000, the same amount Police Department employees were giving back, and the installation of an electrical car plug in the parking lot at a cost of $20,000 to $50,000. He urged the City and the Council to put aside their differences and do what was needed. He acknowledged being a Councilmember was a thankless job much like being a Police Officer; most people did not want to see a police officer until they called 911. He referred to building heights and developers’ inability to develop at the waterfront and downtown and to expand car dealerships on Hwy. 99. If the Council had the ability to do so now, he urged them to raise building heights by 3 – 5 feet. Regardless of whether Councilmembers were running for reelection or seeking the Mayor’s position, he implored them to work together, to put their differences aside for the betterment of the City and the tax paying citizens who must bail out the City. Council President Wilson thanked Officer Harbinson for his frankness and for taking the time to talk to the Council. At the CLRC he learned the following regarding Police Department staffing: Lynnwood, with a population of 36,000 has 79 uniformed officers or 2.2/1,000 compared to Edmonds, with a population of 41,000, has 55 uniformed officers or 1.35/1,000. Of the ten cities Edmonds is compared to, Edmonds ranks at the bottom in terms of police per capita. 5. DRAFT RESOLUTION REGARDING THE 2009 PROPERTY TAX LEVY. Council President Wilson reiterated the CLRC teams agreed a levy was needed and the City needed to work on economic development. Councilmember Peterson and he drafted the proposed resolution as the next step in the levy process. He advised the public would have two opportunities to comment on the resolution prior to the Council taking a vote on May 19. He summarized the resolution directs staff to prepare two levy options for presentation to and consideration by the Council on June 2: 1. A $3.75 million general operations levy that would be reflective of the work done to date by the CLRC and the internal City levy work group. He noted $3.75 million was approximately the average of the CLRC’s recommendations. 2. A 3.75 million parks, public safety and families levy that would have at least 75% of the funds directed to services that support parks, public safety and families. This is reflective of comments at the CLRC that whatever is on the ballot needs to be tangible, things that citizens use and that would be cut if the levy failed. He noted some items would be in both the general operation and the parks, public safety and families levy options such as funding for Yost Pool and the Senior Center, Discovery programs, and funding to replace staff furloughs and give-backs. Packet Page 14 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 12 Council President Wilson requested the parks, public safety and families levy option identify the cuts that would be made in parks and public safety if the levy failed. For example, he recalled the Council considered a cut of $500,000 from the parks maintenance fund which would effectively close all 31 neighborhood parks because they would be required to be fenced off if they were not maintained. Council President Wilson anticipated the Council would have a detailed conversation regarding the two options including what items would be funded by each levy option. There would then be three public open houses in June and July, led by Council and City staff, to review the two options. The goal would be for the Council to affirm a final option by the end of July. Councilmember Bernheim agreed with presenting two options. He suggested including crime prevention in the description of the parks, public safety and families levy and adding funds to adequately staff economic development activities. He also favored including funds dedicated to economic development and tourism. He suggested changing the name to a parks, public safety and economic development levy. Councilmember Wambolt suggested once Mayor Haakenson presented the Council with a list of specific cuts that would be made if the levy failed, the title of the levy could be determined. Council President Wilson commented it was the Mayor’s job to manage day-to-day operations and make emergency cuts in a cash flow crisis. However, it was the Council’s job to make basic priority determination and the Council should have time by November to make their priorities clear. After a decision is made August 4 regarding placing the levy on the ballot, the Council could begin deliberations on what would be cut if the levy failed, beginning with Mayor Haakenson’s recommendations. Councilmember Wambolt commented the Council must develop a list of cuts, recalling several groups indicated their agreeing to the levy was contingent on identifying what would be cut if the levy failed. Council President Wilson announced the Council would take public comment on the resolution on April 28 and May 5 including what items should be in the levy. The Council would vote on the resolution on May 19 and have a presentation on the levy on June 2. 6. RESOLUTION REGARDING ADDRESSING THE LONG-TERM REVENUE CHALLENGES FACING THE CITY OF EDMONDS. Council President Wilson explained Councilmember Peterson and he developed this resolution in an effort to avoid the City being in this position again, acknowledging the City had a revenue problem rather than an expenditure problem. He paraphrased the resolution, given the financial situation, the recommendations by the CLRC teams, the large number of highly qualified citizens who were interested in participating in this process, the City Council directs staff to create an ordinance forming a Citizens’ Economic Development Commission constituted as follows: each Councilmember shall appoint up to two members and the Mayor shall appoint up to three members, terms for positions shall not exceed two years, and the Economic Development Director will staff the Commission. The mission of the Commission is to, 1) determine new strategies for economic development in the City, 2) identify new sources of revenue for the City to consider, and 3) the Commission will deliver a written and oral annual report to the Council and other times as needed. He explained the Commission was an effort to capture the interest of the CLRC in keeping the process moving forward. Council President Wilson suggested each Councilmember appoint only one member and the Mayor appoint two to ensure the Commission was not unwieldy. Packet Page 15 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 13 COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1198 REGARDING ADDRESSING THE LONG TERM REVENUE CHALLENGES FACING THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WITH THE CHANGE THAT EACH COUNCIL WOULD APPOINT ONE MEMBER AND THE MAYOR WOULD APPOINT TWO MEMBERS. Council President Wilson explained the resolution also directs the Planning Board to review and consider strategies for economic development in conjunction with the Citizens’ Economic Development Commission that will improve commercial viability and activity in the City of Edmonds and to report back to the Council on or about the first meeting of December. COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO RETURN THE RESOLUTION TO THE WAY IT WAS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN WITH THE LARGER NUMBER OF MEMBERS. Councilmember Bernheim explained his suggestion was the result of his recent attendance of a meeting of the Senior Center Board of Directors that has 20-22 members and functions very well, has a lot of energy and is more effective than a board of 6-10 members. For Councilmember Wambolt, Council President Wilson explained he recommended the smaller number of members due to his concern 17 members would be unwieldy. AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT OPPOSED. COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO SPECIFICALLY INCLUDE TOURISM WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PLANNING BOARD’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SO THAT THE PLANNING BOARD WOULD REVIEW AND CONSIDER STRATEGIES FOR ECONOMIC AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT. Councilmember Plunkett commented he assumed tourism was part of economic development in Edmonds. He noted there were a number of specifics that could be included if the items to be reviewed were enumerated such as historic preservation, street trees, etc. Council President Wilson agreed tourism was inferred. He wanted to ensure the resolution did not give the Planning Board too much direction and that the Council trusted the Planning Board to present good strategies and recommendations. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Haakenson pointed out that contrary to Mr. Hertrich’s comments, Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton was doing two full-time jobs for the price of one. He was extremely busy and this was one more thing added to his job duties. On behalf of the Planning Board, Mayor Haakenson anticipated they would do a great deal of work and bring the Council a quality work project and he urged the Council not to dismiss them as has happened in the past. Vote on Main Motion as Amended: MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. UPDATE ON YOST POOL Mayor Haakenson explained the group that formed to find a way to keep Yost Pool open asked for additional time for fundraising. Working backward from the projected opening date, staff determined the group could have until April 14 to raise funds necessary to fund the deficit that the pool normally operates Packet Page 16 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 14 under. In each of the past three years, the pool’s expenses exceeded revenues by over $100,000 each year. In good economic times, it may be acceptable to citizens to provide an amenity that loses that much money but in the current economy, it simply is not possible or advisable. He referred to emails to the Save Yost Pool group from a Councilmember that the City had the money to fund Yost Pool this year by taking the money from the Emergency Financial Reserve Fund. Mayor Haakenson agreed there were funds in the Emergency Financial Reserve Fund for use at the Council’s discretion. However, he questioned whether that was the proper action to take in these difficult economic times, whether the City should use its emergency reserve to fund a program that would lose $100,000 when other programs were being cut and employees were taking pay cuts. As much as he would like to keep Yost Pool open, he was unwilling to take such an irresponsible action and if the Council chose to do so, that was their right. Mayor Haakenson commented the fundraising done by the Save Yost Pool group in a very short period of time was nothing less than remarkable; they have raised in excess of $50,000. They have also proposed fee increases that would bring in an additional $29,000. He advised the revenue projections from those fee increases were provided to the Council last week; they had since been tweaked slightly from $30,000 to $29,000. He pointed out the increases required Council approval and acknowledged there was some question whether the increased fees would attract the same number of users or cause a decline in usage which would slightly reduce the revenue projection. He suspected with the publicity Yost Pool has had over the past few weeks there would be a heightened interest in Yost Pool. The third proposed change is a reduction in days the pool is open, staffing reductions and daily schedule changes which would reduce costs by approximately $17,000- $18,000. He concluded the $100,000 deficit had been eliminated and with these actions in place, the citizens of Edmonds could not lose by opening Yost Pool in 2009. He emphasized there was no City money at stake, no money saved from furloughs, no money saved from other budget cuts and no emergency reserve fund money would be spent by opening the pool. He recommended opening Yost Pool for 2009, commenting it was clear by the financial support the pool was an important amenity to the citizens of Edmonds and they were willing to pay for it. Whether they were willing to pay for it in the future remained to be seen. The present of Yost Pool for 2009 awaits only confirmation by the Council of the proposed fee increases. The real future of Yost Pool depends on the levy or the possibility of a public/private partnership. He commented on discussions he was having with a group interested in a public/private partnership, noting if a feasible proposal was developed, it would be presented to Council. Should the levy fail or a partnership not materialize, the City will face the same predicament next year. He did not anticipate the Save Yost Pool group would be able to raise $50,000 every year. Should the levy fail, circumstances would be so dire, the City may close a fire station, permanently close parks or even de-annex as a city and become part of Snohomish County; Yost Pool will only be the tip of the iceberg. In the meantime staff will continue to look at other cost saving options such as a Regional Fire Authority or contracting for police and fire services. The Mayor summarized much had been said about the type of city Edmonds wants to be, noting that a beautiful city did not come without cost. The future of Edmonds was in the hands of the City Council and the voters of Edmonds. He asked the Council to consider a vote on the proposed fee schedule to allow the City to accept the community’s donations and to begin the process of opening Yost Pool for 2009. Councilmember Plunkett recalled 30 days ago Mayor Haakenson was adamant Yost Pool would be closed. He thanked Mayor Haakenson for allowing those interested in Yost Pool an opportunity to fundraise and reach a resolution. Packet Page 17 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 15 Councilmember Bernheim commented he would be willing to spend money from the emergency reserve to make up the shortfall for Yost Pool for one season. He asked whether staff had discussed the Yost Pool funding crisis with the consultants performing the aquatics study. Mayor Haakenson answered Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh had that discussion with them and they had no suggestions that were better than $50,000 in donations. Councilmember Bernheim expressed support for a full schedule for Yost Pool. Mayor Haakenson advised the pool schedule will be shortened slightly and will be open June, July and August as well as other changes that will save money. Councilmember Bernheim expressed support for using funds from the $1.9 million emergency reserve for a full schedule, noting a revenue shortfall was one of the purposes of the fund. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the intent was for the Council to vote on the fee schedule tonight, noting the fee schedule had not been included in the Council packet. Mayor Haakenson advised he was asking the Council to approve the fee schedule tonight, stating he emailed the Council the fee schedule last Friday to allow them to vote on it tonight. He offered to have staff make copies of the proposed fee schedule for Council review. Councilmember Plunkett commented if the intent was for the Council to vote on the fee schedule, it should have been included in the packet. Council President Wilson agreed with Councilmember Plunkett, noting he had questions regarding the fee schedule which Parks & Recreation Director McIntosh was able to answer. He recommended staff move forward with the expectation that the fee increase would be approved but delay final adoption of the fee schedule until next week. Mayor Haakenson suggested taking a recess to provide Councilmembers a copy of the fee schedule. Council President Wilson asked if adoption of the fee increase could be delayed until next week. Mr. McIntosh responded the process was approximately one week behind and every day of delay meant returning staff were finding other jobs. He explained it also took approximately six weeks to ready the pool for opening. With regard to the fees, he explained staff met with the Save Yost Pool group and reached a consensus to increase fees approximately 30-33% over last year. He requested the Council not to wait a week. Council President Wilson commented the fee schedule Mayor Haakenson emailed was not the same as the schedule that was currently proposed. He suggested moving forward as if the fee schedule would be approved but delay approval until next week. Councilmember Wambolt referred to the suggestion to use the emergency reserve fund and suggested discussing the next agenda item before taking any action to use the emergency reserve for Yost Pool. Councilmember Orvis asked if the Council needed to vote on opening the pool and approving the fees. Mayor Haakenson clarified the Council only needed to approve the fees. Councilmember Orvis asked if staff could act in anticipation of the Council approving the fees. Mr. McIntosh commented fees for parks and recreation classes had never been scrutinized by the Council in the past; staff set the fees and reviewed them annually. He summarized staff and the Save Yost Pool group felt the fee increase was fair and workable. Councilmember Peterson suggested moving this item to follow Item 9 to give staff time to copy the fee schedule and if there were any glaring irregularities, the vote could be delayed until next week. Councilmember Bernheim noted the agenda memo indicated Mayor Haakenson would provide comment at the meeting. He asked whether regardless of Council action tonight, the pool would open on its regular schedule. Mayor Haakenson clarified the request before the Council was to approve the fee increase. He Packet Page 18 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 16 pointed out fees were not typically a Council issue but because the Council has made an issue of the fees on several occasions, they were presented to the Council tonight for approval. Councilmember Bernheim pointed out approval of the fees was not on the agenda. Anticipating the Council would in all likelihood adopt the fees next Tuesday, Councilmember Plunkett asked whether staff could move forward or did the fees need to be adopted first. Mr. McIntosh responded the fees did not need to be adopted to move forward with opening the pool. Councilmember Plunkett concluded adopting the fees next Tuesday would not impair staff moving forward. Due to comments regarding support for using emergency funds to open the pool, Councilmember Peterson commented he was unable to consider opening the pool without passing the fee increase first. He would not support opening the pool by taking money from somewhere else when labor had taken salary cuts. As much as he wanted to see the pool opened and recognizing the incredible fundraising effort, he would not inform the Parks Director to open the pool based on the Council probably approving the fee increases. He reiterated his suggestion to make copies of the fee schedule and consider it tonight. Councilmember Bernheim commented he did not want to get pushed into approving the fee schedule by an irregular procedure. It was not on the agenda and the Council did not know what increases were proposed. He suggested proceeding with opening the pool and scheduling the fees on next week’s agenda. Mayor Haakenson apologized the fee schedule was not in the packet, commenting he believed by emailing it to the Council on Friday and allowing the Council the weekend to study it would provide them enough lead time. He commented the updated fee schedule was provided to him tonight; there were two minor changes made to the schedule he emailed to the Council on Friday. He concluded staff should have approved the fees themselves and not brought it to Council. Councilmember Wambolt agreed the Council received an email on Friday stating they would be asked to approve the fees tonight. He assumed the material was made available after the Council packets were prepared and therefore was emailed to the Council. Council President Wilson was embarrassed by administration’s reluctance to answer questions and urging Council to simply approve the fees and not interfere. He expressed concern with emailing the fee schedule to the Council Friday evening which did not allow the Council or citizens an opportunity to comment. Following a brief recess, staff distributed copies of the proposed 2009 Yost Pool fee schedule. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED TO DELAY THIS ITEM UNTIL AFTER AUDIENCE COMMENTS. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO ADOPT THE YOST POOL FEE SCHEDULE. Councilmember Bernheim reiterated his concern that the fee schedule was not on the agenda and the Council had not had an opportunity to review it. After talking with members of the audience during the break, he was willing to vote on it. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. EMERGENCY FUNDS Councilmember Peterson explained the Council had an emergency reserve fund and the policy historically had been not to use it outside catastrophic emergency; however, the language of the ordinance Packet Page 19 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 17 was somewhat vague. His intent with the proposed resolution was to direct staff to make the original language fit the policy, that funds in the Emergency Financial Reserve Fund shall only be accessed in the case of extreme natural or manmade disaster or other calamity and that a revenue shortfall shall not alone be enough to justify use of such funds. He commented the previous discussion illustrated the slippery slope toward using funds from the emergency reserve to pay for shortfalls, a horrible budgetary precedence in his opinion. From a public safety standpoint, the City must have an emergency reserve. In response to some who have said FEMA could bail out the City, he was unwilling to wait for FEMA to bail out the City from a short term crisis. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1199 TO CLARIFY USE OF THE EMERGENCY FUND. Councilmember Bernheim disagreed with the concept, pointing out the existing ordinance created the emergency reserve fund in response to cuts in federal revenue sharing dollars. The ordinance states the City Council of Edmonds states its policy, purpose and intent that the Emergency Reserve Fund has been established to handle unanticipated emergencies including declines in federal revenue. He noted this was the first time he had suggested using funds from the Emergency Reserve Fund, $50,000 from a $1.9 million fund on a one time basis for a use that many residents valued. He objected to putting those monies off limits except for manmade disasters because it would be unavailable for other funding shortfalls. He was opposed to directing staff to prepare an ordinance that changed the language of the existing ordinance. Councilmember Orvis indicated he could not support the proposed language because it did not address emergency liabilities. He explained an emergency liability was the loss of funding currently used to pay a loan requiring the use of General Funds to pay a loan; an example would be if the City were no longer authorized to collect REET. He agreed the emergency reserve should not be used for a revenue shortfall although the current economic situation was not merely a revenue shortfall but was similar to a manmade disaster. He preferred to retain the language as stated in the existing ordinance. Councilmember Wambolt commented the situations referred to by Councilmembers Bernheim and Orvis should be covered by the General Fund balance although the City had not done a good job recently maintaining an adequate balance in the General Fund. The General Fund balance should be 10-15% of General Fund expenses. Mayor Haakenson clarified the intent of the resolution was to direct staff to revise the ordinance and return it to Council for further discussion. Councilmember Peterson agreed that was his intent. Council President Wilson commented his understanding was the Council would be adopting policy that would be used to update the ordinance. Mayor Haakenson pointed out the ordinance in the packet had been updated a few years later addressing many of the issues Councilmember Bernheim raised. He suggested staff provide the updated ordinance to the Council. Council President Wilson observed the intent was to update the ordinance to state the emergency reserve funds were to be used only for disasters, catastrophes, calamities, etc. He did not support using one-time dollars for ongoing programs or services, noting in part that was how the City had gotten in this situation, spending one-time dollars from construction sales tax sources that disappeared after construction was completed. He pointed out in the event of a natural or manmade disaster, it would be horrific if the City did not have funds to respond or had to say those funds had been spent on other programs. He noted the existing ordinance stated the funds could be used for a financial shortfall such as to fund Yost Pool, a use Packet Page 20 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 18 he did not find appropriate. He recommended passing the resolution tonight and having additional discussion when staff presented the ordinance. Councilmember Peterson commented the ordinance would assist with transparency and clarify the purpose of those funds. Councilmember Wambolt commented his research indicated the Emergency Reserve Fund had never been used. Mayor Haakenson agreed it had not been used since he had been in office. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON, OLSON, WAMBOLT, AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS BERNHEIM, ORVIS AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED. Mayor Haakenson requested staff also provide the previous revisions made to the ordinance when this was presented to the Council. 9. AUDIENCE COMMENTS David McNayr, Executive Director, South County Senior Center, commented when he assumed the duties of the Executive Director in mid February, he was immediately faced with a $50,000 reduction in the 2009 budget. He assured this shortfall had nothing to do with Mayor Haakenson’s announcement in March regarding the proposed funding reduction for the Senior Center. In order to meet the reduced budget for 2009, it was necessary to eliminate 3 positions and the hours of an additional position, approximately 40% of the Center’s staff. Next, he applauded the City of Edmonds for their efforts and support to preserve the environment and health of the planet. In recognition of Earth Day on April 22, the Senior Center will begin recycling for the first time in their 21 year history. He encouraged the public to read the latest edition of Sound Connection, available on line at the Senior Center website, www.scscedmonds. org. George Murray, Edmonds, asked how many others rode their bike to the meeting tonight, noting after the sustainability presentations at the last Council meeting, he feared if he drove to the meeting he would be the only one with a car. He thanked the Edmonds Beacon and especially Pat Ratcliff for the news they report. He described seeing several young girls in front of the Frances Anderson Center with a Save Our Yost Pool sign collecting donations for the pool. He was ashamed and angry that the community had let Yost Pool reach this point. He pointed out the pool and parks were the threads that hold a community together and should be preserved. Dick Van Hollebeke, Edmonds, explained the CLRC which included his wife and he were a diverse group who gave their time and talent and in four weeks came together to support a levy and to urge the Council to change the City’s economy. He suggested this as an example to the Council to work better together. He also participated on the Save Yost Pool group, an amazing effort that raised $53,286.47 in one month. Donations ranged from a 5-year old who emptied his piggy bank to donate $1.18, the Hubbard Family Foundation Trust who donated $5,000 and many donations of $100, $200, $500, and $2000. The group raised $10,400 in donations by standing in front of grocery stores on the Friday and Saturday before Easter for a total of six hours each day. He noted this bodes well for aquatics and announced on May 6 there would be a meeting to present four ideas for the future of aquatics programs in Edmonds. He urged the Council to work together, noting audience members were embarrassed that the Council could not come together on a simple matter of adopting the fee schedule. He reiterated the levy committee urged the Council to work harder to make Edmonds a city everyone could be proud of. Nancy Hopper, Edmonds, who worked with Mr. Van Hollebeke and others on the Save Yost Pool effort, thanked Mayor Haakenson for taking the time to work with them as they developed the three part Packet Page 21 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 19 solution that included, 1) increasing fees to match neighboring pools and increasing non-resident rates, 2) refining the schedule and finding efficiencies and 3) fundraising. She was hopeful a public/private partnership could be identified to make the pool viable and perhaps generate revenue. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:30 PM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Dave Page, Edmonds, commented he was unable to continue his commitment to the Save Yost Pool and levy committee due to medical issues. After describing the efforts taking place in Edmonds to hospital staff, a nurse provided him an x-ray of his chest that showed his heart was in the right place. He noted the groups’ recommendations referred to the culture of thought and culture of change. He agreed the City would have been in financial difficulty even without the current economic crisis because the City had been operating on less and less revenue each year. The decision for the future was what kind of city residents wanted. He noted economic development was mentioned 12 times in the groups’ presentations. He recalled there had been efforts toward economic development by this administration in the past 10 years but it had been a battle against efforts that halted economic development. He urged the Council to get together on economic development and to compromise on issues such as building height at the waterfront. He offered to work on passing the levy. Priya Cloutier, Edmonds, commended citizens for thinking outside the box to save Yost Pool. To Councilmembers Plunkett and Bernheim, she was disappointed they were willing to save the pool using the emergency reserve fund. She was offended that saving the pool was more important to them than paying staff. She urged the Council to think outside the box. She recalled Councilmember Plunkett’s statement after the Council retreat that citizens will not mind paying an extra $22 per month, concluding that rather than considering how to develop an economic development plan, Councilmember Plunkett took the easy way out. She commended Councilmember Peterson and Council President Wilson for making the difficult decision to support labor. Diane Bucksnish, Edmonds, commented community was the essence of one’s life. She announced that in addition to the presentation at Brackett’s Landing by Sustainable Edmonds, the dog park, OLAE, will be having a potluck at a director’s home on April 22 to celebrate the earth. She invited anyone interested in attending to visit their website, www.olae.org. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, urged the Council to use the additional $435,449.57 from the Esperance contract appropriately. He also suggested funds could be taken from the fiber optic consultant in the amount of $130,000 that had never been put out to bid. With regard to Councilmember Peterson’s suggestion to clarifying the use of the Emergency Reserve Fund, he suggested it was an effort to eliminate complaints that the Mayor was not sending the $1.9 million in that fund. Mayor Haakenson pointed out all the additional money from the Esperance contract was budgeted in the 2009/2010 budget with the exception of $100,000. With regard to the fiber optic contract, he was happy to bring it back to the Council again, noting he had attempted to cut that from the budget in November 2008 and the Council reaffirmed their desire to continue with the fiber optic project. Fred Gouge, Commissioner, Port of Edmonds, advised a business, A to Z, was coming to the Port to provide commuter service while the Hood Canal bridge was closed May 1 for 4-6 weeks. Further information about the service was available on the Port of Edmonds website or the Kenmore Air website. In addition to commuter service, A to Z will offer trips around Puget Sound. Next, he requested the Council schedule the Port’s Executive Director Chris Keuss on the Council agenda before he retires. The Port hired a new Executive Director whom Mr. Keuss will introduce to the Council. A retirement party for Mr. Keuss is planned for May 15 at the Edmonds Yacht Club; all Councilmembers are invited. He explained the Port’s charter was economic development. They are involved in a master plan process for Packet Page 22 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 20 Harbor Square and will have a consultant assist with planning for redevelopment of Harbor Square. He encouraged the Economic Development Commission to consider a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the height at Harbor Square. He anticipated a great deal of citizen input on the Harbor Square master plan. He commended the Citizen Levy Review Committee. He encouraged the public to visit the Port, restaurants and athletic club and hotel at Harbor Square. He advised there was a ceremonial ground breaking for the Yacht Club but the Port currently did not have a contract with the Yacht Club. Council President Wilson offered to schedule Mr. Keuss on the May 5 agenda. Heidi Hardwick, Edmonds, urged the Council not to be so hard on themselves, noting the Council had worked together like a family. She expressed support for public safety, noting her ex-husband, the father of her five children, was an Edmonds police officer. She urged citizens to fund the Senior Center, public safety Yost Pool and the flower program via the levy. 10. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF APRIL 14, 2009. Community Services/Development Services Committee Councilmember Orvis reported the Committee reviewed the proposal to ban plastic bags and directed the City Attorney’s office to research language from other jurisdictions and to develop two options for Council consideration, a plastic bag ban at grocery stores and a ban on plastic bags at all retail establishments. The Committee will review the ban options and present it to the Council for a public hearing in May/June. Next, the Committee discussed the temporary buildings/uses ordinance. He learned from Snohomish County that by classifying canopies as carports, up to 200 square feet could be permitted without a change in the State building code. The Committee also discussed a recent code amendment that allowed minor architectural improvements such as bay windows to be approved for nonconforming buildings. Staff learned that change did not remedy the specific situation that promoted the code amendment and additional refinements may be necessary. The final item the Committee discussed was 2x6 construction to improve thermal insulation for new construction. The State recently improved their standards, requiring R-21 for wall insulation which cannot be attained with 2x4 construction and fiberglass insulation. He planned to research this further. Finance Committee Councilmember Wambolt reported the first item was authorization for the Mayor to sign a professional services agreement with Rick Jenness who is working on the fiber optic project. He noted Mr. Jenness had been involved with the Community Technology Committee since its inception and was now doing work for which he needs to be compensated. His contract was moved to the May 12 Finance Committee meeting to allow staff to respond to questions. The second item the Committee reviewed was the 2009 first quarter budget report. He reported the City was $356,000 or 4.6% below its expense budget. Sales tax for 2009 is expected to be $1 million short; at the end of the first quarter sales tax collections were down by 19.6% from 2008 or approximately $250,000. REET receipts are also lower; in 2007 the City collected $1.4 million, half that amount in 2008 and in 2009 the City expected to collect half the amount collected in 2008, only approximately $350,000. At four months, REET collections are 54% below collections one year ago. He noted some other tax collections have increased such as the gas utility tax due to the cold winter and the new City cable utility tax was being collected by Comcast. The final item discussed by the Committee was interfund loan activity which was approved as Consent Agenda Item 2-I. Public Service Committee Councilmember Peterson reported the Committee approved the revised Esperance Agreement for the provision of fire protection and emergency medical services which increased their payment from $295,000 to $730,000, most of which was already budgeted in the 2009/2010 budget. He recognized Fire Chief Tomberg for negotiating additional funds in the contract. The Committee also recommended revisions to the Edmonds City Code Title 5 which was approved on the Consent Agenda. The Committee recommended continued participation in the Snohomish County Regional Drug Task Force. The Packet Page 23 of 148 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 21, 2009 Page 21 Committee’s discussion of red light cameras included concerns regarding their effectiveness and safety. Assistant Chief Gannon was asked to provide additional information particularly from neighboring cities that use red light cameras. The final item was review of the Municipal Court which was continued to the next meeting. 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson wished Councilmember Olson a happy birthday on April 24. He invited a Councilmember to attend the annual Puget Sound Regional Council general assembly meeting on April 30 at 4:00 p.m. as Council President Wilson, the City’s delegate, was unable to attend and he was uncertain whether he would be able to attend. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Wilson explained the process for establishing the Citizens’ Economic Development Commission will include adoption of an ordinance mid to late May and members would be appointed shortly thereafter. He invited anyone interested in participating to send a letter of interest or resume to any Councilmember or to Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman at Spellman@ci.edmonds.wa.us. He recognized tomorrow was Administrative Professional’s Day and thanked Ms. Spellman for the wonderful job she did for the Citizens Levy Review Committee including working weekends and evenings. Council President Wilson commented he was humbled, impressed and proud to be part of a community that could raise $50,000 in three weeks to keep the pool open. Councilmember Wambolt wished Councilmember Olson a happy birthday. Councilmember Peterson reminded the public of the Conversation on Climate Change tomorrow night in the Brackett Room of City Hall from 6:00 – 9:00 p.m., sponsored by the City and Sustainable Edmonds. They will be discussing climate action that could be taken on the household and on the community level. Attendees were asked to bring their own reusable mug or water bottle. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:34 p.m. Packet Page 24 of 148 AM-2249 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposits and Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services Submitted For:Kathleen Junglov Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #111215 through #111327 for $650,479.28 dated April 23, 2009. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #47999 through #48038 for the pay period April 1, through April 15, 2009 for $825,852.28. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2009 Revenue: Expenditure:$1,476,331.56 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $650,479.28 Payroll: $825,852.28 Attachments Link: Claim cks 4-23-09 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Sandy Chase 04/24/2009 08:24 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/24/2009 08:24 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/24/2009 08:35 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/24/2009 08:37 AM APRV Packet Page 25 of 148 Form Started By: Debbie Karber  Started On: 04/23/2009 05:14 PM Final Approval Date: 04/24/2009 Packet Page 26 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111215 4/23/2009 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 409256 PICKLEBALL T-SHIRTS PICKLEBALL T-SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 26.40 Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 2.51 Total :28.91 111216 4/23/2009 071604 ADVENTNET INC 159296 QUOTE ID 404030907-2 Annual subscription for AdventNet310-00121 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 995.00 Total :995.00 111217 4/23/2009 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101531696 M5Z34 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 57.70 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 5.14 M5Z34101709822 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 55.71 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 4.96 M5Z34101719319 S/C Inv 101531696 12/31/08 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 2.00 Total :125.51 111218 4/23/2009 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8712 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR 411.000.654.534.800.330.00 85,244.41 Total :85,244.41 111219 4/23/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4227293 UNIFORM SERVICES 1Page: Packet Page 27 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111219 4/23/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23 Total :37.27 111220 4/23/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4214938 21580001 UNIFORM SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.63 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.80 21580001655-4227296 UNIFORM SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.51 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.79 Total :202.73 111221 4/23/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4206905 PW MATS 2Page: Packet Page 28 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111221 4/23/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.16 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.59 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.59 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.59 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.59 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.60 Total :38.12 111222 4/23/2009 071653 ARNOLD, MEREDITH ARNOLD10411 METAL ETCHED EARRINGS METAL ETCHED EARRINGS~ 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 71.40 Total :71.40 111223 4/23/2009 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 587675 75179 3Page: Packet Page 29 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111223 4/23/2009 (Continued)071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 1,183.88 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 112.47 Total :1,296.35 111224 4/23/2009 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST May 2009 MAY 2009 AWC PREMIUMS 05/09 Fire Pension AWC Premiums 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 3,824.50 05/09 Retirees AWC Premiums 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 26,037.10 05/09 Gaydos AWC Premiums 001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,188.13 05/09 AWC Premiums 811.000.000.231.510.000.00 309,953.23 Total :341,002.96 111225 4/23/2009 072581 BARK TIME BLOWER TRUCK SERVICE 9113 YARD WASTE DUMP YARD WASTE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 135.60 Total :135.60 111226 4/23/2009 002258 BENS EVER READY 0668 FS 16,17,20 - EXTINGUISHER SERVICE FS 16,17,20 - EXTINGUISHER SERVICE 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 180.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 16.02 Total :196.02 111227 4/23/2009 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 138 3/15-4/15/09 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE 3/15-4/15/09 Web Site Maintenance 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 390.00 Total :390.00 111228 4/23/2009 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 739719 INV#739719 EDMONDS PD - MACHADO 4Page: Packet Page 30 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111228 4/23/2009 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC SERVICE BARS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.90 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.37 Total :4.27 111229 4/23/2009 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 14100973 C-311 C-311 ODOR CONTROL PROJECT 414.000.656.538.800.410.00 24,860.25 Total :24,860.25 111230 4/23/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY142746 OPS SUPPLIES Stations' supplies 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 576.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 54.72 ALS SUPPLIESLY143090 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 68.94 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 8.21 ALS SUPPLIESLY143091 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 22.98 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.84 5Page: Packet Page 31 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111230 4/23/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY ALS SUPPLIESLY143092 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 146.93 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 15.61 Total :949.73 111231 4/23/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT10456 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #10456 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 128.80 Total :128.80 111232 4/23/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460403986 UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 20.12 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 1.91 OPS UNIFORMS460403987 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 81.31 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 7.72 UNIFORMS460405039 Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 131.85 Stn 17 - OPS 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 131.85 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.53 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.52 6Page: Packet Page 32 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111232 4/23/2009 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION OPS UNIFORMS460405057 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.49 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.11 Total :539.41 111233 4/23/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES w2027283 Supplies - City Hall Supplies - City Hall 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.37 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.08 Supplies - City Widew2027502 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 399.39 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.55 Supplies - City Widew2027502-1 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 92.49 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.23 Supplies - City Widew2028384 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 489.27 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.55 Supplies - City Widew2028384-1 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 64.29 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.72 7Page: Packet Page 33 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111233 4/23/2009 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES Supplies - City Widew2028390 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 50.47 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.49 Supplies - City Widew2033425 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 717.34 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 63.84 Supplies - City Widew2034906 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 248.71 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.14 Supplies - City Widew2034906-1 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 209.76 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.67 Supplies - City Widew2034906-2 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 44.99 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.00 Extension Tube~w2037365 Extension Tube~ 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.56 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.90 8Page: Packet Page 34 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111233 4/23/2009 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES Supplies - City Widew2039276 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 291.49 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.94 Supplies - City Widew2039276-1 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 93.59 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.33 Supplies - City Widew2039276-2 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 118.93 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.58 MCH - suppliesw2041736 MCH - supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 84.66 Fac Maint - Cleaning supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 392.26 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 42.45 Supplies - City Widew2041736-1 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 37.19 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.31 Supplies - City WideW2043796 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 115.72 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.30 9Page: Packet Page 35 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111233 4/23/2009 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES Supplies - City Widew2043796-1 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 382.51 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.34 FAC towelsW2046757 FAC towels 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 209.22 Fac Maint - towels and supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 290.53 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.48 Supplies - City Widew2049542 Supplies - City Wide 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 623.78 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 59.26 Swivel Neck Assyw2049542-1 Swivel Neck Assy 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 385.12 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.59 Total :5,894.39 111234 4/23/2009 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 2425 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.550.310.00 111.28 Total :111.28 111235 4/23/2009 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 1287 Domain Name - Registration 10Page: Packet Page 36 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111235 4/23/2009 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS Domain Name - Registration 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 1,350.00 HP - Blade Kits 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 4,033.66 HP iLO Adv for Server 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 234.14 Shafcom - Wireless headset noise filter 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 14.99 SurveyMonkey.- Annual Subscription 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 200.00 Paypal - Blackberry curve batteries 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 53.30 Central Pmts - Class program pmt test 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 230.00 CDW-G Inkjet Printer Cartridge 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 35.01 Bal from previous statement 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 0.02 Total :6,151.12 111236 4/23/2009 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 9858 ALS MISC Asst Chief EMS Sectn 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 25.00 Total :25.00 111237 4/23/2009 070136 CORREIRA, MARK 4/17/09 Tuition reimbursement - 1/1 - 3/31/09 Tuition reimbursement - 1/1 - 3/31/09 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 544.00 Total :544.00 111238 4/23/2009 005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE Cretin, Lawrence Monitor City Hall Lobby for CLR Monitor City Hall Lobby for CLR 001.000.110.511.100.410.00 192.00 Total :192.00 11Page: Packet Page 37 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111239 4/23/2009 065494 CTED 042009 DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION CONFERENCE Main St Revitalization Conference 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 125.00 Total :125.00 111240 4/23/2009 071552 CUBBAGE, NANCY CUBBAGE10250 MOSAIC ART MOSAIC ART #10250 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 84.00 Total :84.00 111241 4/23/2009 061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES 099829 FAC - ELEVATOR LIC FAC - ELEVATOR LIC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 120.20 LIBRARY ELEVATOR LIC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 109.40 MUSEUM ELEVATOR LIC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 109.40 CITY HALL ELEVATOR LIC100014 CITY HALL ELEVATOR LIC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 131.00 PW ELEVATOR LIC100081 PW ELEVATOR LIC 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 109.40 Total :579.40 111242 4/23/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 7506 SUPPLIES 10/30 OIL 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 35.88 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.41 Total :39.29 111243 4/23/2009 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ECA0306 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ZING GO THE STRINGS CONCERT ON MARCH 6, 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 1,000.00 12Page: Packet Page 38 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111243 4/23/2009 (Continued)071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ADVERTISINGECA0422 PROVIDE ADVERTISING FOR CONCERT ON 123.000.640.573.100.410.00 1,000.00 Total :2,000.00 111244 4/23/2009 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00650 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 23.95 LIFT STATION #81-00925 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 22.06 LIFT STATION #11-01950 LIFT STATION #1 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 23.95 LIFT STATION #21-02675 LIFT STATION #2 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 22.06 Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms1-03950 Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 337.08 Public Works Meter Shop1-05350 Public Works Meter Shop 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 51.24 LIFT STATION #61-05705 LIFT STATION #6 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 46.79 CITY HALL1-13975 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 335.91 CITY HALL1-14000 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 58.35 Total :921.39 111245 4/23/2009 072287 EMI FILTRATION PRODUCTS LLC KENT-38211 879400 13Page: Packet Page 39 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111245 4/23/2009 (Continued)072287 EMI FILTRATION PRODUCTS LLC HC PLEAT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 479.16 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 55.64 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 50.81 Total :585.61 111246 4/23/2009 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 945133-10 7 ES REF # 94513310 7 Q1-09 Unemployment Insurance 001.000.390.517.780.230.00 19,719.67 Total :19,719.67 111247 4/23/2009 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0051220-IN INV#0051220-IN ACCT#0011847 EDMONDS PD REFINISH 2 CORPORAL BADGES 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 108.00 REFINISH ASST CHIEF BADGE 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 54.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 11.36 Total :173.36 111248 4/23/2009 071108 ENVIROCARE INTERNATIONAL INC 9805 6071 SPRAY NOZZLE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,710.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 25.12 Total :1,735.12 111249 4/23/2009 066004 ESRI 91953413 ARCINFO CONCURRENT USE PRIMARY & ArcInfo Concurrent Use Primary &310-00122 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 9,900.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 940.50 Total :10,840.50 14Page: Packet Page 40 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111250 4/23/2009 069042 EVERETT HYDRAULICS INC 0000012783 REPAIR UNIT 17 SNOW PLOW REPAIR UNIT 17 SNOW PLOW 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 3,102.50 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 276.12 Total :3,378.62 111251 4/23/2009 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1458159 17983 REP KIT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 29.88 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.84 Total :32.72 111252 4/23/2009 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 241006 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT May-09 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent 001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00 Total :300.00 111253 4/23/2009 012560 HACH COMPANY 6181539 112830 LAB SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 104.95 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 15.95 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 11.49 Total :132.39 111254 4/23/2009 012845 HARBOR SQUARE ATHLETIC CLUB 2009 MEMBERSHIP 2009 MEMBERSHIP FEES- EDMONDS PD 2009 GROUP MEMBERSHIP FEES 001.000.410.521.400.410.00 5,760.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.400.410.00 547.20 Total :6,307.20 111255 4/23/2009 064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD 36 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 15Page: Packet Page 41 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111255 4/23/2009 (Continued)064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 194.76 Total :194.76 111256 4/23/2009 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 2126-127 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ALS-PI,JS 001.000.510.526.100.410.00 751.00 OPS-CS,JW,MF,JB 001.000.510.522.200.410.00 2,596.00 Total :3,347.00 111257 4/23/2009 072715 INFORMATIVE GRAPHICS CORP 30737 INV#30737 EDMONDS PD REDACT-IT SOFTWARE, DESKTOP 001.000.410.521.110.410.00 1,170.00 Total :1,170.00 111258 4/23/2009 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 010494746 C/A 010494746 3/10-4/10/09 PR1-1 City Phone Service 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 824.25 Total :824.25 111259 4/23/2009 069349 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 1106058-IN Posters, books, handouts, etc. Posters, books, handouts, etc. 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 54.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 4.14 Total :58.14 111260 4/23/2009 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 425801 54278825 HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,651.33 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 324.97 Total :3,976.30 111261 4/23/2009 066585 KINNEY, DON 4/20/09 OT from sick leave buyback (not bought 16Page: Packet Page 42 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111261 4/23/2009 (Continued)066585 KINNEY, DON OT from sick leave buyback (not bought 001.000.410.521.220.110.00 19.46 Total :19.46 111262 4/23/2009 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 04102009-01 INV#04102009-01 EDMONDS PD 26 CAR WASHES - 03/09 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 130.00 Total :130.00 111263 4/23/2009 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO 80210 YOST POOL IMPROVEMENTS MOTOR - YOST POOL IMPROVEMENTS 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 317.36 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 30.15 Total :347.51 111264 4/23/2009 006048 L N CURTIS & SONS 2064772-00 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ALS 001.000.510.526.100.250.00 2,809.68 OPS 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 2,809.68 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.250.00 266.92 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 266.92 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING2064772-01 ALS 001.000.510.526.100.250.00 7,947.60 OPS 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 7,947.60 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.250.00 707.34 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 707.33 17Page: Packet Page 43 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111264 4/23/2009 (Continued)006048 L N CURTIS & SONS OPS SUPPLIES2066967-00 Bulrd strap 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 116.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 10.21 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.310.00 11.99 Total :23,601.27 111265 4/23/2009 072264 LEXIPOL LLC 2993 INV#2993 - EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICE MANUAL~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 3,200.00 Total :3,200.00 111266 4/23/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 100812 OFFICE SUPPLIES LETTERHEAD AND ENVELOPES 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 243.00 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 23.08 Total :266.08 111267 4/23/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 100913 BUSINESS CARDS ORDER Business Cards~250-00221 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 44.16 M.A. Marsh250-00221 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 19.16 M. Froland250-00221 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 19.16 Sales Tax 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 4.20 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 3.64 Total :90.32 111268 4/23/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 100707 Storm - Phone Directory Business cards 18Page: Packet Page 44 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111268 4/23/2009 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS Storm - Phone Directory Business cards 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 40.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 3.56 Total :43.56 111269 4/23/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 25309353 123106800 PIPE TAP/PIPE FITTINGS/BATTERIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 793.34 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 75.63 12310680025333816 RUBBER GROMMET 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.75 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.89 12310680025578308 FAN/PVC FITTING/BELT/REGULATOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 495.19 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 19.02 12310680025919327 STEEL CHANNEL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 59.18 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.90 Total :1,477.90 111270 4/23/2009 072010 MEISER, GARLAND MEISER0310 PICKLE BALL LEAGUE SUPERVISOR PICKLE BALL LEAGUE SUPERVISOR 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 84.00 Total :84.00 111271 4/23/2009 072719 MENRIT, FRANCIS MENRIT0414 REFUND 19Page: Packet Page 45 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111271 4/23/2009 (Continued)072719 MENRIT, FRANCIS REFUND FOR CANCELLED CLASS DUE TO 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 18.00 Total :18.00 111272 4/23/2009 063773 MICROFLEX 00018495 JAN-09 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM JAN-09 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 12.16 Total :12.16 111273 4/23/2009 068581 MILLS, GREGORY 4/16/09 OT from sick leave buy back (3/25 - OT from sick leave buy back (3/25 - 001.000.410.521.220.110.00 50.00 Total :50.00 111274 4/23/2009 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC WA23-232153 SHEAVES/BUSHING SHEAVES/BUSHING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 46.70 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.40 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.14 Total :59.24 111275 4/23/2009 072569 NAC ARCHITECTURE INC 3 AQUATICS FACILITY STUDY EDMONDS AQUATICS FEASIBILITY STUDY 125.000.640.594.750.410.00 10,330.02 Total :10,330.02 111276 4/23/2009 024600 NEUERT, L L 35 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 2,339.44 Total :2,339.44 111277 4/23/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0926846 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 360.58 20Page: Packet Page 46 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111277 4/23/2009 (Continued)061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0927941 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0928760 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0929510 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 174.47 Total :895.63 111278 4/23/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 347390 PARK MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 132.79 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES383561 INKJET PAPER 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 35.72 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES396046 LAMINATING POUCHES, POST IT NOTES 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 31.91 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES483660 COVER STOCK 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 9.87 GLOVES FOR DISCOVERY PROGRAM 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 6.66 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.94 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 0.63 21Page: Packet Page 47 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :237.561112784/23/2009 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 111279 4/23/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 142433 Pens Pens 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 28.92 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 2.58 Return pens291676 Return pens 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 -28.92 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 -2.75 Return Stapler Remover291877 Return Stapler Remover 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 -12.43 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 -1.18 Binder clips, pens, flags418218 Binder clips, pens, flags 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 29.50 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 2.81 Total :18.53 111280 4/23/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 407386 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 119.34 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 11.34 Total :130.68 111281 4/23/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 226457 Water Appt book Water Appt book 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.23 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.26 22Page: Packet Page 48 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111281 4/23/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC Returned Water Dept Appt Book272471 Returned Water Dept Appt Book 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 -14.23 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 -1.35 Fleet dept stapler287591 Fleet dept stapler 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.69 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.34 PW Admin Director Appt book329732 PW Admin Director Appt book 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 89.64 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 8.52 Water dept appt book329821 Water dept appt book 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.01 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.33 Water Meter Reader toner348191 Water Meter Reader toner 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 78.54 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.47 Water Meter extra toner371311 Water Meter extra toner 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 78.54 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.47 PW office supplies377130 PW office supplies 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 80.52 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.310.00 7.64 23Page: Packet Page 49 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :400.621112814/23/2009 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 111282 4/23/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 383927 Misc. office supplies including key Misc. office supplies including key 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 347.22 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 32.98 Total :380.20 111283 4/23/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 403294 ADMIN SUPPLIES office supplies 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 459.50 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 43.66 ADMIN SUPPLIES403408 office supplies 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 40.74 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.310.00 3.88 Total :547.78 111284 4/23/2009 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.820087 MCH - PAINT MCH - PAINT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 179.95 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.02 MCH - PAINT821754 MCH - PAINT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 73.98 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.58 Total :276.53 111285 4/23/2009 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100-AP09 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE Lease from 3/30 to 4/30 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 866.00 24Page: Packet Page 50 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :866.001112854/23/2009 064552 064552 PITNEY BOWES 111286 4/23/2009 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 174887 National Safety return postage National Safety return postage 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 17.36 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage175642 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.14 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage175807 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.14 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage175952 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.16 Dept of L&I Safety video return postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.14 Total :43.22 111287 4/23/2009 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 04371 UNIT F1 B1 FUEL 25Page: Packet Page 51 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111287 4/23/2009 (Continued)029117 PORT OF EDMONDS Fire Boat - Fuel 511.000.657.548.680.320.00 46.35 Total :46.35 111288 4/23/2009 065021 PRINTING PLUS 66434 SUMMER CONCERT FLYERS SUMMER CONCERT SERIES 2009 FLYERS 117.100.640.573.100.490.00 894.60 Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.490.00 79.62 Total :974.22 111289 4/23/2009 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ10331 FELDENKRAIS CLASSES FELDENKRAIS FINDING FLEXIBILITY 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 357.00 Total :357.00 111290 4/23/2009 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 09 060S ACCOUNT NO. EDMO005 Q2-09 Clean Air Assessment per RCW 001.000.390.531.700.510.00 6,235.75 Total :6,235.75 111291 4/23/2009 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B TELEMETRY TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52 Total :138.52 111292 4/23/2009 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SERVICES 20077 PS - PANIC BUTTON ADDITIONS PS - PANIC BUTTON ADDITIONS 001.000.230.512.500.480.00 2,154.62 Sales Tax 001.000.230.512.500.480.00 191.76 Total :2,346.38 111293 4/23/2009 069477 ROTARY OFFSET PRESS INC 15310 BULK MAIL PREP 26Page: Packet Page 52 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111293 4/23/2009 (Continued)069477 ROTARY OFFSET PRESS INC BULK MAIL PREP FOR SPRING 09 CRAZE 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 93.33 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 8.87 SPRING 2009 CRAZE15313 CRAZE 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 3,947.29 CRAZE 117.100.640.573.100.440.00 3,652.97 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 374.99 Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.440.00 347.03 Total :8,424.48 111294 4/23/2009 071979 SACKVILLE, JODI L 4/16/09 OT from sick leave buy back not OT from sick leave buy back not 001.000.410.521.220.110.00 85.26 Total :85.26 111295 4/23/2009 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 133144 OPS PROTECTV CLOTHNG fire gloves 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 130.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 7.99 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 13.11 Total :151.10 111296 4/23/2009 069276 SEATTLE FLUID SYSTEM TECH LLC 5051238 TUBING/TUBE UNION 27Page: Packet Page 53 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111296 4/23/2009 (Continued)069276 SEATTLE FLUID SYSTEM TECH LLC TUBING/TUBE UNION 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 340.52 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 95.20 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 38.78 Total :474.50 111297 4/23/2009 070172 SEWING MACHINE SERVICE CO INC 97770R OPS REPAIRS sewing mach repair 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 165.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 15.68 Total :180.68 111298 4/23/2009 036955 SKY NURSERY 276923 MULCH FERTILE MULCH 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 80.91 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 7.28 Total :88.19 111299 4/23/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060028723 YOST PARK POOL YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 682.28 SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD5320018384 SIERRA PARK BALLFIELD 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.36 Total :711.64 111300 4/23/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2470018124 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 35.08 28Page: Packet Page 54 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111300 4/23/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 fire station # 162540794324 fire station # 16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,521.65 LIFT STATION #92790012476 LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 192.77 FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK3460019262 FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 306.77 Signal at 220th & 84th3630573867 Signal at 220th & 84th 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 75.64 BLINKING LIGHT3970013599 BLINKING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.87 SIGNAL LIGHT4320010194 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 36.04 TRAFFIC LIGHT5450016042 TRAFFIC LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 162.67 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS5470012336 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.87 TRAFFIC LIGHT5510015661 TRAFFIC LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.38 Total :2,418.74 111301 4/23/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 178067412 206-001-485-5 24400 HIGHWAY 99/RICHMOND PARK 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.13 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.69 29Page: Packet Page 55 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111301 4/23/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 463-001-671-7290058001 8421 244TH SW/RICHMOND PARK 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.13 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.69 Total :59.64 111302 4/23/2009 065176 SNOHOMISH CO TOURISM BUREAU QTFEdm0 QUARTERLY TOURISM FORUM 3/31/09 Quarterly tourism forum 3/31/09 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 30.00 Total :30.00 111303 4/23/2009 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000222225 DUMP FEES DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 388.49 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 11.51 Total :400.00 111304 4/23/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 28.25 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.70 Total :29.95 111305 4/23/2009 062280 SOUND SEAL & PACKING CO 13607 MECHANICAL SEALS MECHANICAL SEALS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3,476.56 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 36.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 312.66 Total :3,825.72 111306 4/23/2009 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO May 2009 MAY 2009 STANDARD INSURANCE PREMIUMS 30Page: Packet Page 56 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111306 4/23/2009 (Continued)060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO 05/09 Standard Insurance 811.000.000.231.550.000.00 19,823.33 Total :19,823.33 111307 4/23/2009 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO 1/1/07 LTD premiums (1st quarter 2009) LTD premiums (1st quarter 2009) 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 121.50 Total :121.50 111308 4/23/2009 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1831651 FAC - ELECT SUPPLIES FAC - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 327.55 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.12 Total :358.67 111309 4/23/2009 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 41760 Investigation services - WWTP Investigation services - WWTP 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 3,136.00 Total :3,136.00 111310 4/23/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10803818 SUPPLIES SCREWS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.01 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.68 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.92 Total :10.61 111311 4/23/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 2009-6989 APRIL SUMMER CAMP BANNER AD APRIL SUMMER CAMP BANNER AD 001.000.640.574.200.440.00 125.00 Total :125.00 111312 4/23/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1643493 NEWSPAPER ADS 31Page: Packet Page 57 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111312 4/23/2009 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY Ordinance 3732 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 31.60 Total :31.60 111313 4/23/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1642581 Legal notices. Legal notices. 001.000.620.524.100.440.00 66.48 Total :66.48 111314 4/23/2009 063596 UNIMIN CORPORATION 2793703 005-0776072 SAND 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3,488.20 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 323.97 Total :3,812.17 111315 4/23/2009 062693 US BANK 3538 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS 32Page: Packet Page 58 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111315 4/23/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 14.98 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION FLOWERS 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 151.57 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION SUPPLIES 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 341.62 EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 27.37 EGG HUNT SUPPLIESJ 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 4.90 EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 14.12 CONFERENCE - CHAPIN 117.100.640.573.100.490.00 175.00 ANNUAL CPH FEE - EDHOUSE 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 50.00 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.560.310.00 20.34 BATTERIES 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 3.26 CREDIT3538 CREDIT FOR FUSE 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 -2.17 Total :800.99 111316 4/23/2009 062693 US BANK 3306 LAB PHOTOS LAB PHOTOS 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 14.63 Total :14.63 111317 4/23/2009 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA001447 Water Dept DOT Water Dept DOT 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 65.00 Total :65.00 33Page: Packet Page 59 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111318 4/23/2009 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA0264018-WA INV #0264018-WA ACCT 001447 EDMONDS PD BLOOD LEAD TESTING 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 300.00 Total :300.00 111319 4/23/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 53.29 YOST POOL425-775-2645 YOST POOL 001.000.640.575.510.420.00 54.91 Total :108.20 111320 4/23/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0423 03 0260 1032797592 07 AFTER HOURS PHONE 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 56.10 Total :56.10 111321 4/23/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM LIBRARY SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 15.01 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS425-775-1534 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 161.52 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 299.97 Radio Line between Public Works & UB425-775-7865 Radio Line between Public Works & UB 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 52.73 34Page: Packet Page 60 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111321 4/23/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST PUBLIC WORKS CPNNECTION TO 911425-RT0-9133 Public Works Connection to 911 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48 Public Works Connection to 911 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81 Public Works Connection to 911 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78 Total :638.73 111322 4/23/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-774-0944 FS #20-FAX LINE FS #20-FAX LINE 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.19 Total :50.19 111323 4/23/2009 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 09-395 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS FOR TODD CORT 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 234.00 Total :234.00 111324 4/23/2009 065828 WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2009-1621 ANIMAL CONTROL ACADEMY 3/09 SHOEMAKE AC ACADEMY 3/16-3/27/09 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 350.00 Total :350.00 111325 4/23/2009 064183 WA STATE LEOFF EDUCATION ASSOC 4/23/09 WSLEA Conference 5/11 -5/14/09 (Ken WSLEA Conference 5/11 -5/14/09 (Ken 009.000.390.517.370.490.00 275.00 Total :275.00 111326 4/23/2009 067374 XPEDITER TECHNOLOGY LLC 2572 INV#2572 - EDMONDS PD 35Page: Packet Page 61 of 148 04/23/2009 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 5:11:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 111326 4/23/2009 (Continued)067374 XPEDITER TECHNOLOGY LLC XPEDITER PATROL SOFTWARE 001.000.410.521.400.350.00 5,000.00 INTERBASE 7.5 LICENSE-DESKTOP 001.000.410.521.400.410.00 2,000.00 INTERBASE 7.5 LICENSE-LAPTOP 001.000.410.521.100.350.00 3,238.00 Total :10,238.00 111327 4/23/2009 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 904 APRIL 09 MONTHLY RETAINER April 2009 - Retainer 001.000.360.515.230.410.00 11,330.00 Total :11,330.00 Bank total :650,479.28113 Vouchers for bank code :front 650,479.28Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report113 36Page: Packet Page 62 of 148 AM-2246 2.D. WSLCB List - March Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Linda Carl, Mayor's Office Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Approval of the Washington State Liquor Control Board March 2009 list of businesses requesting renewal of their liquor licenses. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Please approve the attached list of businesses. Previous Council Action Narrative The City Clerk's Office, the Police department, and the Mayor's Office have reviewed the attached list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the liquor licenses for the listed businesses. [Woodway Gas is out of business, and WSLCB will be notified.] Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: WSLCB List Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:11 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 11:15 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:17 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl  Started On: 04/23/2009 10:50 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 63 of 148 Packet Page 64 of 148 Packet Page 65 of 148 AM-2238 2.E. Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report - April, 2009 Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Stephen Clifton, Community Services Time:Consent Department:Community Services Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report – April, 2009. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative As requested by the City Council, this report provides an update on major projects currently worked on by staff of the Community Services and Economic Development Departments. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report - April, 2009 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/22/2009 01:35 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/22/2009 01:46 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 08:43 AM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Clifton  Started On: 04/22/2009 01:23 PM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 66 of 148 Packet Page 67 of 148 Packet Page 68 of 148 Packet Page 69 of 148 Packet Page 70 of 148 Packet Page 71 of 148 Packet Page 72 of 148 Packet Page 73 of 148 Packet Page 74 of 148 Packet Page 75 of 148 Packet Page 76 of 148 Packet Page 77 of 148 Packet Page 78 of 148 AM-2239 2.F. Construction Project Completion and Council Acceptance of Project Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Steve Koho, Wastewater Treatment Plant Time:Consent Department:Wastewater Treatment Plant Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the Electrical Improvement Project and Council acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff City Council accept the Electrical Improvements Project. Previous Council Action On June 6, 2006, City Council authorized Addendum No. 1 to the professional services agreement with Brown & Caldwell for the Electrical Improvements Project. On August 15, 2006, City Council authorized Addendum No. 2 to the professional services agreement with Brown & Caldwell. On May 1, 2007, City Council authorized Addendum No. 3 to the professional services agreement with Brown & Caldwell. On November 20, 2007, City Council authorized staff to call for construction bids for the Electrical Improvements Project. On January 8, 2008, City Council authorized the award of a contract for the Electrical Improvements Project to Ewing Electric in the amount of $79,194. Narrative The Electrical Improvements Project at the Treatment Plant is complete. The project was designed by Brown & Caldwell, constructed by Ewing Electric, and accepted by Brown & Caldwell and City staff. Project Budget: $250,000 Design expenses $78,000 Contractor expenses $79,180 Miscellaneous expenses $18,008 Total project cost $175,188 Packet Page 79 of 148 Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Public Works Noel Miller 04/22/2009 05:22 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 08:42 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 09:19 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 09:22 AM APRV Form Started By: Steve Koho  Started On: 04/22/2009 05:01 PM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 80 of 148 AM-2247 2.G. Approval of Payment to Landau Associates Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:Consent Department:City Council Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Approval of payment in the amount of $1,111.41 to Landau Associates related to environmental assessment of the Old Milltown courtyard site. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action On June 3, 2008 the Council authorized staff to contract with Landau & Associates to conduct environmental work at the Old Milltown site for $6,500. On June 24, 2008 the Council approved additional payment to Landau in the amount of $4,600 for a total of $11,100 for the Phase II investigation/environmental assessment of the Old Milltown parcel. At the October 7, 2008 Council Meeting, Council President Plunkett suggested to Mayor Haakenson that the Landau invoice be paid out of the City's ending cash balance. Mayor Haakenson informed Council President Plunkett the City had already paid Landau $4,500, Salter Joyce Ziker $3,335, and approximately $10,000 to Ogden Murphy Wallace for attorney fees. Mayor Haakenson felt that since this was a Council initiative that it would be appropriate for the payment of this invoice to come from Council funds. Council President Plunkett asked the Council for approval to pay this amount from the Council Contingency Fund. The balance in the Council Contingency Fund was $22,000.00. Although the total amount approved by the Council was $11,100.00, before the Old Milltown Phase II Investigation could be completed, an additional sample analysis was needed. The cost of this additional sample analysis was $800 which was approved by Mayor Haakenson. The Council approved the additional amount be paid out of the Council Contingency Fund. Narrative Landau Associates upon further review of outstanding/unbilled charges for the Old Milltown Packet Page 81 of 148 Landau Associates upon further review of outstanding/unbilled charges for the Old Milltown Phase II project noted there were items that the City had not been invoiced for. Council President Wilson put this matter on the consent agenda so the City Council could pay the remainder owing out of the Council Contingency Fund. Attachment: Landau Associates Invoice # 0024522 Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Landau Assoc. Invoice #0024522 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 02:55 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 03:46 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 03:56 PM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman  Started On: 04/23/2009 11:27 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 82 of 148 Packet Page 83 of 148 AM-2240 2.H. Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Asstance Grant Application Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Gerry Gannon, Police Department Submitted For:Al Compaan Time:Consent Department:Police Department Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Application for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff This agenda memo is for Council information on the application of a JAG Grant for equipment purchases. Previous Council Action None Narrative As part of the application process the department must notify Council that we are are applying for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistant Grant (JAG) Program. If approved by the Bureau of Justice Assistance the department will receive an award of $39,175. The department plans on using the grant to improve technology within the department. The funds will be used for the following projects: 1) Purchase two hand held computers and printers for the two officers assigned to the motorcycles. Cost $10,767.13 2) Two wireless nodes for downloading the ticket information to our court. Traffic collision reporting goes to the Washington State Patrol. Cost $1,686.85. 3) Purchase 13 scanners and printers for the patrol fleet of vehicles. The scanners and printers are needed to issue tickets using the Washington State's software program called Sector. This program allows officer to submit tickets and collision reports electronically. Cost $10,676.25. 4) Purchase 9 pagers for officers assigned to the Hostage Negotiation Team, SWAT Team , and Dive Team. The pagers would replace the commercial pagers currently assigned to these, thus eliminating the on going monthly fees. The paging system is maintained at Snocom. Cost $2,359.64 Packet Page 84 of 148 5) Purchase 12 additional Tasers. This will allow officers to be assigned a Taser and not have to rely on pool Tasers. At times we have not had enough Tasers to issue to officers because of lack of pool Tasers. Cost $11,169.00 Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 2009 JAG Grant Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 02:55 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 03:46 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 03:56 PM APRV Form Started By: Gerry Gannon  Started On: 04/23/2009 08:28 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 85 of 148 Packet Page 86 of 148 Packet Page 87 of 148 AM-2237 2.I. Building Safety Week Proclamation Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Linda Carl, Mayor's Office Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent Department:Mayor's Office Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Proclamation in honor of Building Safety Week, May 3 - 9, 2009. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative This year’s theme of Building Safety Week is, “Building Safety: Where You Live, Work, and Play,” which will be celebrated May 3 through May 9, 2009. The City supports the International Code Council in partnership with dedicated building safety and fire officials, architects, engineers, and the construction industry, who develop and enforce the codes that safeguard us in our homes, at school, and in the buildings we work in. The United States has the highest level of building safety in the world. We encourage everyone to raise their level of awareness of building safety and to take appropriate steps to improve our built environment. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Proclamation Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/21/2009 02:43 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/21/2009 02:44 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/22/2009 11:15 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Carl  Started On: 04/21/2009 02:26 PM Final Approval Date: 04/22/2009 Packet Page 88 of 148 Packet Page 89 of 148 AM-2235 3. Edmonds Business Story: Garden Gear. Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:10 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Edmonds Business Story: Garden Gear. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative A representative from Garden Gear, an Edmonds' business, will be presenting Garden Gear's story. Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 08:42 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 09:19 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 09:22 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman  Started On: 04/20/2009 02:34 PM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 90 of 148 AM-2245 4. Presentation on Edmonds Backyard Wildlife Habitat Project Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:10 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Presentation on Edmonds Backyard Wildlife Habitat Project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative A representative of this organization will be making a presentation on backyard wildlife habitat. Attached is a copy of the presentation. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Edmonds Backyard Wildlife Habitat Presentation Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 02:55 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 03:46 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 03:56 PM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman  Started On: 04/23/2009 10:41 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 91 of 148 Ed m o n d s B a c k y a r d W i l d l i f e H a b i t a t Pr o j e c t : A p r i l 2 0 0 9 U p d a t e A C o m m u n i t y - W i d e C e r t i f i c a t i o n T h r o u g h t h e N a t i o n a l Wi l d l i f e F e d e r a t i o n a n d t h e W A D e p t . o f F i s h & W i l d l i f e “F o s t e r i n g a C o m m u n i t y t h a t L i v e s in H a r m o n y w i t h N a t u r e ” Lo g o b y S u e C o c c i a , A w a r d w i n n i n g NW a r t i s t f r o m E d m o n d s , W A Pa c k e t Pa g e 92 of 14 8 Th e E B W H G o a l s & M i s s i o n • Ed m o n d s G o a l s f o r N a t i o n a l / S t a t e C o m m u n i t y Ha b i t a t C e r t i f i c a t i o n ( P o p u l a t i o n - B a s e d ) – 4 5 0 P o i n t s fo r e d u c a t i o n a l a c t i v i t i e s , o u t r e a c h , a n d co m m u n i t y p r o j e c t s 9 15 0 H o m e s c e r t i f i e d t h r o u g h N W F & WD F W a s B a c k y a r d H a b i t a t s 9 5 S c h o o l s c e r t i f i e d a s S c h o o l y a r d H a b i t a t s 9 5 C o m m o n p l a c e s c e r t i f i e d , e g : c h u r c h e s , pa r k s , b u s i n e s s e s • In c r e a s e c o m m u n i t y a w a r e n e s s o f l o c a l w i l d l i f e a n d em p o w e r o u r s e l v e s a n d o u r n e i g h b o r s t o p r e s e r v e , re s t o r e , a n d c r e a t e l o w m a i n t e n a n c e w i l d l i f e f r i e n d l y ha b i t a t a t h o m e , a t s c h o o l , a t w o r k , i n o u r p a r k s , a n d ot h e r p u b l i c p l a c e s . Pa c k e t Pa g e 93 of 14 8 Ou r A c c o m p l i s h m e n t s S o F a r … • On T r a c k f o r C e r t i f i c a t i o n i n 2 0 0 9 ! – 20 5 pt s t o d a t e ! … N e e d 4 5 0 – 1 3 2 Ho m e s C e r t i f i e d ! … N e e d 1 5 0 9 Ma p d e n o t i n g E d m o n d s d i s t r i b u t i o n i n p r e p a r a t i o n . –4 Sc h o o l y a r d s C e r t i f i e d … N e e d 5 9 We s t g a t e E l e m e n t a r y , W o o d wa y E l e m e n t a r y , M a d r o n a Sc h o o l , H o l y R o s a r y S c h o o l –4 Co m m o n P l a c e s C e r t i f i e d … N e e d 5 9 Ed m o n d s U n i t a r i a n U n i v e r s a l i s t C h u r c h , E d m o n d s Un i t e d M e t h o d i s t C h u r c h , C i t y o f E d m o n d s - Y o s t P a r k , Ro s a r y H e i g h t s 9 Wo r k s h o p s , C i t y - W i d e R e s t o r a t i o n W o r k P r o j e c t s , Ed u c a t i o n a l O u t r e a c h … Th e f u n n e v e r e n d s ! Pa c k e t Pa g e 94 of 14 8 Pi c t u r e s W o r t h T h o u s a n d s o f W o r d s Pa c k e t Pa g e 95 of 14 8 EB W H Pa r t n e r s • C i t y o f E d m o n d s P a r k s & Re c r e a t i o n • P i l c h u c k A u d u b o n • W A N a t i v e P l a n t S o c i e t y • J u s t F r o g s / T o a d s T o o • E d m o n d s C o m m u n i t y Co l l e g e , L E A F S c h o o l • P e o p l e f o r P u g e t S o u n d • S u s t a i n a b l e E d m o n d s • W S U E x t e n s i o n • N W S t r e a m C e n t e r • F l o r e t u m G a r d e n C l u b • A l l i a n c e o f C i t i z e n s f o r Ed m o n d s • T h e W i l d B i r d N e s t S t o r e • P u g e t S o u n d B i r d Ob s e r v a t o r y • S u s t a i n a b l e S h o r e l i n e Ed u c a t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n • S e a t t l e U r b a n N a t u r e • E P A / S e a t t l e • P A W S W i l d l i f e C e n t e r • S a r v e y W i l d l i f e C e n t e r • N O A A F i s h e r i e s An E d m o n d s K i n d o f Na t i o n a l S e r v i c e D a y - 2 0 0 9 (E d m o n d s C i t y P a r k ) Pa c k e t Pa g e 96 of 14 8 Wh a t ’ s H a p p e n i n g N o w ? • Cr e a t i n g a h a b i t a t / n a t i v e p l a n t d e m o g a r d e n a t t h e W i l l o w Cr e e k H a t c h e r y – P a r t n e r s h i p w i t h t h e C i t y o f E d m o n d s , L a e b u g t e n S a l m o n Ch a p t e r , P i l c h u c k A u d u b o n , W A N a t i v e P l a n t S o c i e t y , a n d Pe o p l e f o r P u g e t S o u n d • Ad o p t - A - S t r e a m / P e r r i n v i l l e C r e e k P r o j e c t – P a r t n e r s h i p w i t h W D F W , N W S t r e a m C e n t e r , a n d C i t y o f Ed m o n d s w i t h h e l p f r o m S e a v i e w E l e m e n t a r y • Ho s t e d S n o h o m i s h / K i n g C o u n t y H a b i t a t S t e w a r d s tr a i n i n g , t h i s y e a r s N a t i o n a l W i l d l i f e F e d e r a t i o n R e g i o n a l Le a d e r s h i p M e e t i n g , a n d A s s o c i a t i o n o f Z o o s & Aq u a r i u m ' s F r o g w a t c h U S A t r a i n i n g . $ I n c o m e f o r P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t a n d S o u t h Co u n t y S e n i o r C e n t e r Pa c k e t Pa g e 97 of 14 8 An d T h e r e ’ s M o r e … • Pa r t n e r o f P u g e t S o u n d B i r d f e s t & t h e c i t y ’ s W a t e r s h e d Fu n F a i r & W a t e r f r o n t F e s t i v a l – C i t y o f E d m o n d s E v e n t s • “G o i n g N a t i v e ” G a r d e n F a i r . . . a F u n d r a i s e r f o r S t e v e n s Ho s p i t a l i n P a r t n e r s h i p w i t h t h e W a s h i n g t o n N a t i v e Pl a n t S o c i e t y o n M a y 7 t h – N a t i v e p l a n t s i t e r e s c u e , o r g a n i z i n g a n a t i v e p l a n t s a l e , wo r k i n g w i t h l o c a l n u r s e r i e s t o l a b e l a n d p r o v i d e n a t i v e pl a n t i n f o , r e v i e w i n g l o c a l w e e d o r d i n a n c e s a n d ad v o c a t i n g c h a n g e t o p r o m o t e n a t i v e h a b i t a t s • “F r i e n d s o f t h e M a r s h ” p a r t n e r , h o p i n g t o r e t a i n a & re s t o r e h a b i t a t i n t h e E d m o n d s M a r s h • An E d m o n d s K i n d o f N a t i v e T r e e / S h r u b P l a n t i n g Ch a l l e n g e C o m i n g t h i s F a l l ? • Ed m o n d s . . . A T r e e C i t y U S A ? ? ? Pa c k e t Pa g e 98 of 14 8 Tr e e C i t y U S A • 3 B e n e f i t s o f B e c o m i n g a T r e e C i t y U S A – P u b l i c I m a g e 9 He l p s p r e s e n t t h e k i n d o f i m a g e t h a t mo s t c i t i z e n s w a n t t o h a v e f o r th e p l a c e t h e y l i v e o r c o n d u c t b u s i n e s s . – C i t i z e n P r i d e 9 Tr e e C i t y U S A r e c o g n i t i o n a w a r d s p a r k s d e p a r t m e n t s , v o l u n t e e r s , an d o t h e r s w h o w o r k o n b e h a l f o f o u r c o m m u n i t y ’ s t r e e s . 9 In s p i r e s r e s i d e n t s t o p r o v i d e b e t t e r ca r e o f t r e e s o n p r i v a t e p r o p e r t y or v o l u n t e e r f o r f u t u r e u r b a n f o r e s t r y p r o j e c t s . – F i n a n c i a l A s s i s t a n c e ! $ P r e f e r e n c e i s s o m e t i m e s g i v e n t o T r e e C i t y U S A c o m m u n i t i e s o v e r ot h e r c o m m u n i t i e s w h e n a l l o c a t i o n s o f g r a n t m o n e y s a r e m a d e f o r tr e e s o r f o r e s t r y p r o g r a m s . • La k e F o r e s t P a r k , L y n n w o o d , S h o r e l i n e , P o r t To w n s e n d , E v e r e t t , B o t h e l l , S e a t t l e , R e d m o n d , Be l l e v u e . . . Pa c k e t Pa g e 99 of 14 8 Tr e e C i t y U S A S t a n d a r d s • To q u a l i f y , a t o w n o r c i t y m u s t m e e t fo u r s t a n d a r d s es t a b l i s h e d b y T h e Ar b o r D a y F o u n d a t i o n a n d t h e Na t i o n a l A s s o c i a t i o n o f S t a t e Fo r e s t e r s . 1. A T r e e B o a r d o r D e p a r t m e n t 2. A T r e e C a r e O r d i n a n c e 3. A n A r b o r D a y O b s e r v a n c e o r P r o c l a m a t i o n 4. A C o m m u n i t y F o r e s t r y P r o g r a m w i t h a t L e a s t a $ 2 / C a p i t a B u d g e t • Th e s e s t a n d a r d s w e r e e s t a b l i s h e d t o en s u r e t h a t e v e r y q u a l i f y i n g co m m u n i t y w o u l d h a v e a v i a b l e t r e e ma n a g e m e n t p l a n a n d p r o g r a m . ht t p : / / w w w . a r b o r d a y . o r g / p r o g r a m s / t r e e C i t y U S A / i n d e x . c f m Pa c k e t Pa g e 10 0 of 14 8 We b S i t e : ww w . e d m o n d s b a c k y a r d w i l d l i f e h a b i t a t . o r g Em a i l : ed m o n d s b w h @ g m a i l . c o m Pa c k e t Pa g e 10 1 of 14 8 AM-2241 5. Sustainability Programs and Strategies at Edmonds Community College Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:15 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Sustainability programs and strategies at Edmonds Community College. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative Council President Wilson placed this item on the agenda. Amy Johnson, Program Coordinator for the Center for Service learning at Edmonds Community College will be making this presentation. The name of the sustainability efforts on the Edmonds Community College campus is the “Sustainability Council.” Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 10:38 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 11:03 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:11 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman  Started On: 04/23/2009 09:11 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 102 of 148 AM-2214 6. Proposal to Ban Single Use Plastic Checkout Bags in Edmonds. Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Councilmember Strom Peterson Time:30 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Public comment regarding proposal to ban single use plastic checkout bags in Edmonds. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action During the April 7, 2009 Council Meeting, the Council considered the possibility of banning plastic bags in retail, commercial outlets in Edmonds and reviewed a Resolution submitted by Councilmember Strom Peterson for discussion. Following review and discussion, Councilmember Peterson moved, seconded by Council President Wilson, to adopt the resolution. Council President Wilson moved, seconded by Councilmember Wambolt, to amend the "Resolved" paragraph of the resolution to read: Now therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Edmonds directs staff to prepare an ordinance banning the use of single-use plastic checkout bags and encouraging the use of reusable shopping bags for future Council and community consideration." The amendment passed unanimously. The vote on the main motion as amended passed unanimously. The Council referred this issue to the Community/Development Services Committee for review. Attachment 1: 4/7/2009 Council Meeting Minutes. The Community/Development Services Committee met on April 14, 2009. During that meeting, Bio Park from the City Attorney’s office was present for the discussion. Bio informed the Committee that the City Attorney’s office is conducting research on how other cities have approached adopting and implementing a ban on plastic bags. The intent is to develop options for Edmonds to consider based on this research, including examples of “unintended consequences” that other jurisdictions may have experienced. Options discussed by the Committee to consider would be a broad ban on plastic bags as well as a narrowly tailored ban targeting such businesses as groceries and retailers. Pros and cons for each potential ban option should be presented and discussed. Packet Page 103 of 148 ACTION: City Attorney’s office to develop options for a ban on plastic bags and present these for discussion by the Committee at its next meeting in May. Attachment 2: 4/14/2009 CS/DS Committee Meeting Minutes Narrative Council President Wilson has placed this item on the agenda to give the public a chance to comment on the ordinance regarding plastic bags that is coming before the Council in May, 2009. Attached is a newspaper article written by Councilmember Peterson on this topic. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Attach 1 CM 4-7-2009 Link: Attach 2 CS-DS Min 4-14-2009 Link: Attach 3 Councilmember Peterson Newspaper Article Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 09:18 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 09:19 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 09:22 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman  Started On: 04/10/2009 02:14 PM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 104 of 148 Packet Page 105 of 148 Packet Page 106 of 148 Packet Page 107 of 148 Packet Page 108 of 148 The Scoop on Plastic Bags The Edmonds City Council is currently considering a ban on single-use check out bags in our city. The basic what’s, where’s, and why’s of this legislation are answered in some of the following frequently asked questions. Are all plastic bags being banned? No. Bags for meats, vegetables, and bulk foods will not be banned. Neither will garbage bags, sandwich bags, and the like, only single-use plastic shopping bags. What about “dog poop”? As mentioned above, select plastic bags are still available (for vegetables etc). Special biodegradable bags are also available for this specific purpose. While it may cost a few dollars, you will also support a local business. Why should government get involved? The effects of plastic bags have a direct impact on the environment and public health. Studies by the Algalita Marine Research Foundation indicate that plastic does not completely degrade in the marine environment (unlike paper), and instead breaks down into small pieces. These small bits of plastic attract bacteria, pesticides, and other toxins which may be transferred to marine animals that ingest them as food. This bioaccumulation of toxins travels up the food chain to reach dangerous levels. We are at the top of that food chain. Like government bans on lead paint, asbestos, or DDT, this ban is primarily a public health issue. During these economic times, why now? Establishing Edmonds as a “green” city will support economic development by attracting new businesses, residents, and tourists. This is not only about the environment, it is about our economic bottom line. This is just part of a more comprehensive agenda that the council is working on in order to foster better economic and environmental sustainability. Isn’t paper worse than plastic? The City discourages the use of all types of single-use bags, because they consume more resources and produce more waste than reusable bags. However, plastic bags are the least desirable because they are made using oil (a nonrenewable resource), degrade very slowly, and pose a public health risk. What about recycling plastic bags? The average of recycling plastic bags nationally is below 5%. Edmonds uses approximately 8,000,000 plastic bags per year. That means Edmonds will still have over 7 million bags somewhere in our environment. Large grocery store chains have provided recycling containers for plastic bags since the early 1990s without a significant increase in recycling rates. Recycling rates for paper bags are vastly higher than for plastic. But plastic bags are free, aren’t they? The Wall Street Journal estimates the US consumes 100 billion single use plastic grocery bags every year making it a $4 billion a year industry. This is passed on to the consumer through higher food costs. This does not even count the additional costs for cleanup (your tax dollars), space in landfills (your money again), or the long term environmental and human health impacts. Packet Page 109 of 148 What stores are affected? That depends on how the legislation is written. Many municipalities have focused on large retailers as that is the bulk of the problem. Others have tiered the ban to give smaller retailers an opportunity to adjust. We, as a council, have not made a final decision on this and will take public comment into account. What is the solution? Reusable shopping bags are both the best economical and environmental solution. One reusable shopping bag will replace hundreds of single use options. Reusable bags conserve resources while reducing litter, waste to landfills, and greenhouse gas emissions. Many stores offer small incentives for using reusable bags. Will this make a difference? Obviously a bag ban in Edmonds is not going to end the ever increasing amount of plastics fouling our environment. However, cities and countries around the world are banning plastic bags and promoting the use of reusable bags. In 2008, China banned the use of the ultra-thin plastic bags (saving 37 million barrels of oil). Bangladesh banned plastic bags in 2003 as did Coles Bay, Tasmania. What’s next? The Council will be taking public comment on April 28th and will be scheduling a public hearing within the next 90 days. The city attorney is writing a draft ordinance which will be discussed at both the committee and council level. Finding solutions for current uses for plastic bags are part of this process, including helping organizations such as the Edmonds Food Bank or Friends of the Library make a transition or using fewer bags. Decisions are being made at a national level regarding environmental policy and regulations. Edmonds is in a position to become a more sustainable city and to make the decisions rather than letting the decisions be made for us. If you have any questions or comments, please email Council Member Strom Peterson at peterson@ci.edmonds.wa.us. Packet Page 110 of 148 AM-2244 7. Draft Levy Proposal and Draft Resolution Regarding 2009 Property Tax Levy Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:30 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Public comment on draft levy proposal and draft Resolution regarding 2009 property tax levy. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action The Council formed the Revenue Work Group in October of 2008 by a unanimous vote. They approved the general levy scope. In February 2009, the 2009 Levy Timeline was affirmed unanimously. The Citizen Levy Review Committee was formed, completed its work, and made a series of recommendations. One recommendation was to move forward with the levy ranging from $2 to $4.3 million. Other comments included making the levy more specific than it currently is. This Resolution directs staff to further refine and develop options for Council consideration and additional public review during the summer of 2009. During the April 21, 2009 Council Meeting, the Council directed staff to prepare two levy options for presentation to and consideration by the Council on June 2, 2009. Narrative Council President Wilson has placed this item on the agenda to allow for public comment on the draft levy proposal and draft Resolution regarding 2009 property tax levy. The Council will be voting on this draft resolution during the May 19, 2009 Council Meeting. Attachment: Draft Resolution Regarding 2009 Property Tax Levy Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Attach 1 Reso re 2009 Property Tax Levy Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 10:38 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 11:03 AM APRV Packet Page 111 of 148 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:11 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman  Started On: 04/23/2009 09:46 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 112 of 148 DRAFT -1- Resolution No.___ A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE 2009 PROPERTY TAX LEVY (To be voted on May 19, 2009) Whereas, the City Council adopted the 2009 Levy Timeline in February to provide a roadmap for action and decision leading up to the November 2009 levy, and Whereas, the Citizens’ Levy Review Committee was formed to vet the proposed levy and examine the general fiscal situation faced by the City, and has now completed that effort, and Whereas, the comments and recommendations made by this committee were supportive of a levy between $2m and $4.3m, and called for specific, tangible items that could be supported by the citizens of Edmonds, like public safety and parks, and Whereas, the current draft proposed levy is a function of 6 months of work on the part of Council and staff, and represents a strategy for a broad and general operations levy, and Whereas, the two programmatic priorities of the community of Edmonds continue to be public safety and parks, and which alternatively could be a dominant component of a second levy option, and Whereas, it is the sense of the Council that items listed on the 2009 levy should be previous cuts or proposed cuts, should the levy not pass, so that there is a clear trade-off and understanding about that for which citizens are voting this November, Now therefore be it resolved that the City Council directs staff to prepare two levy options for presentation to and consideration by Council on June 2nd, and which meet the following criteria: “General Operations Levy” Option: a refined general operations levy in the amount of $3.75m which would be reflective of the work done to date by the Citizens’ Levy Review Committee and the internal city Levy Work Group. “Parks, Public Safety & Families Levy” Option 2: a more specific levy in the amount of $3.75m which would have at least 75% of the funds directed to services which support parks, public safety and families in the City of Edmonds, to include but not be limited to: - Funds for programs that support Edmonds families such as Yost Pool, the Senior Center, Discovery Programs, Domestic Violence prevention programs, etc, (approx. $500,000) - Funds for parks maintenance funds to keep open our 31 neighborhood parks threatened for closure (approx. $800,000) - Funds to fully staff and fully compensate our public safety employees in the police and fire departments, as well as other departments (approx. $300,000 to public safety, with $300,000 to other departments) - Funds to adequately staff Edmonds Crime Prevention services (approx. $200,000) And be it further resolved that following the presentation of these two options, the Edmonds City Council, in conjunction with city staff be prepared to conduct 3 Open Houses for the public during the latter half of June and/or the first half of July. RESOLVED this _____ day of ________, 2009. APPROVED: ________________________________ MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON Attachment 1 2 pages Packet Page 113 of 148 DRAFT -2- ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: _____________________________________ CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Page 114 of 148 AM-2242 9. Discussion and Potential Action on Temporary Buildings/Uses Ordinance Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:04/28/2009 Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Time:30 Minutes Department:Planning Type:Action Review Committee:Community/Development Services Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Discussion and potential action on temporary buildings/uses Ordinance. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Provide direction to staff on whether to approve the original ordinance considered on March 3, 2009, or advertise for a new hearing based on the modifications considered by the Community Services/Development Services Committee. Previous Council Action City Council held a public hearing on the amendment on March 3, 2009. The draft ordinance was referred to the Community Services/Development Services Committee on March 17, 2009. The Committee has reviewed and referred the draft ordinance back to the full Council for action, with potential modifications as discussed below. Narrative On March 3, 2009, Council voted to approve an amendment to Chapter 17.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) addressing temporary buildings and uses. On March 17, 2009, Council remanded the ordinance back to Council Committee for further discussion. Staff was asked to look at increasing the allowable floor area of tents and canopies in section 17.70.030A of the proposed ordinance from 120 square feet to 200 square feet. As discussed at the Committee, this proposal also requires an amendment to the residential building code to increase the square footage of exempt accessory structures from 120 square feet to 200 square feet; the draft changes to Chapter 19.05 would exempt fabric canopy structures included in the proposed Temporary Use ordinance from the requirement to obtain a building permit. Pursuant to RCW 19.27.060, amendments to the building code by local jurisdictions “…shall not result in a code that is less than the minimum performance standards and objectives contained in the state building code.” The proposed amendments meet this requirement. In other words, choosing whether to go with a 120- vs. 200-square-foot threshold is a policy decision by Council. Part of the discussion at the Committee involved the relationship between the size threshold for these structures and other rules that come into play, especially zoning setbacks. It was pointed out that regardless of size, the location of these items frequently runs afoul of zoning setback requirements. If the size of structures exempt from a building permit is increased, it is likely that Packet Page 115 of 148 more of these larger structures will be placed in setbacks, potentially resulting in more expense and frustration in code violation cases. For discussion purposes, attached are examples of various types of canopy structures (see Exhibit 4). The CS/DS Committee reviewed the potential changes to the draft ordinance amending Chapter 17.70, as well as an amendment to ECDC 19.05.010 covering "Work Exempt from Permit" for building permits. The action by the CS/DS Committee was for staff to bring the proposed ordinances back to Council for discussion. The Council has a couple of options. Council can adopt the ordinance as approved on March 3rd and prepard for adoption on March 17th (Exhibit 1) before it was referred to the Committee. Alternatively, Council can move toward changing the threshold from 120 to 200 square feet by advertising for a new hearing on the combined changes to Chapter 17.70 with the new amendment to the Building Code, 19.05.010 (both draft ordinances are contained in Exhibit 2). Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1: March 17th Ordinance Link: Exhibit 2: Ordinances reviewed by CS/DS Committee Link: Exhibit 3: City Council minutes Link: Exhibit 4: Examples Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:11 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 04/23/2009 11:15 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/23/2009 11:17 AM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave  Started On: 04/23/2009 09:13 AM Final Approval Date: 04/23/2009 Packet Page 116 of 148 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 3/4/09 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, temporary structures in excess of 120 feet of floor space are limited and regulated by the International Building Code but not addressed by the temporary use provisions of Chapter 17.70; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to address the issue of cargo and other temporary storage containers, and WHEREAS, the existing temporary conditional use permit process may result in costs in excess of the storage container or security unit to be utilized; and WHEREAS, these issues were considered at public hearings before the Edmonds Planning Board resulting in a recommendation for adoption of certain provisions as contained here in this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council Community Services and Development Services Committee have reviewed the recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 2009; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to amend Chapter 17.70 regarding temporary uses in order to extend the time in which temporary uses may {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - Packet Page 117 of 148 be maintained, create an administrative, less expensive process to consider such uses, clarify the definitions and application of temporary use provisions to storage units, tents, canopies and other temporary structures, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 17.70 TEMPORARY USES Sections: 17.70.000 Security units. 17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models. 17.70.010 Other temporary buildings. 17.70.020 Temporary parking lots. 17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses. 17.70.035 Temporary storage units. 17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining. 17.70.000 Security units. A. Definition. A security unit is a building, mobile home, trailer, or vehicle used temporarily in connection with providing security during construction of a structure or building for which a valid building permit has been issued. B. Conditions. A security unit is permitted in all zones under the following conditions: 1. All sanitation facilities and safety measures shall be approved in advance by the building official, health official and other appropriate city officials. 2. Unless earlier directed by the building official pursuant to subsection (B)(3) of this section, security units in the following zones shall be removed after the following time periods: a. In an RS zone, one year; b. All other zones, one year, with a one-year extension if the community development director finds that the project is large {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 118 of 148 enough to require the longer period, disregarding any self-imposed delay. 3. The building official may order the removal of a security unit if any of the following situations occur: a. The building permit expires or is cancelled. b. The building official issues an occupancy permit. c. The building official determines that the security structure is no longer needed to provide protection against theft or vandalism. 17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models. A. Definition. A project sales office or sales model is space within an otherwise permitted building used temporarily to support the sale of multifamily or condominium units. B. Conditions. A project sales office or sales model is only permitted to occur on the property containing the project or unit(s) being offered for sale. The sales office or sales model shall be discontinued and removed prior to occupancy of the last unit available for sale on the property. C. The granting of a permit for a sales office or sales model shall be reviewed and processed in accordance with the requirements of ECDC 20.95.040, Staff decision – No notice required. 17.70.010 Other temporary buildings. Except as provided below in ECDC 17.70.030, a conditional use permit shall be required to construct a temporary building in any zone. The permit shall be administratively reviewed by staff and shall be valid for a period of one year; provided however, that said permit may be extended by the development services director for a single one-year extension upon submittal of a written application prior to the expiration of the original permit. All the requirements of the zoning district shall be met. An appeal of the staff decision granting or denying such a permit or extension shall be reviewed by the hearing examiner in accordance with the requirements for any other conditional use permit under ECDC 20.100.010, with the decision being appealable to the city council under the procedures applicable to any other conditional use permit. {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 119 of 148 17.70.020 Temporary parking lots. See ECDC 17.50.090, which by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses. The city council may, at its sole discretion, approve the installation of a temporary building or mobile office structure to house municipal office and related storage in conjunction with or in anticipation of the construction or remodeling of a municipal facility. Such structure shall be exempt from any other requirements of the zoning code and the decision of the city council shall be final. The city staff is hereby directed to provide for reasonable landscaping and screening of such structure and sufficient drawings and site plans to adequately inform the council of the nature and proposed use of the structure, its design and the anticipated length of time which the structure will be in use. In no event shall the use of such a temporary structure exceed three years without the specific authorization of the city council. 17.70.035 Temporary storage units Defined: A “Canopy” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of fabric or pliable materials supported by any manner, except by air or the contents it protects, and is open without sidewalls or drops on 75 percent or more of the perimeter. B. “Cargo or shipping Container” means a standardized, container designed without an axle or wheels, which was originally, specifically, or formerly designed for or used in the packing, shipping, movement or transportation of freight, articles, goods or commodities. C. “Tent” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of fabric or other pliable material supported by any manner except by air or the contents that it protects. Cargo or shipping containers. No person shall place or cause to be placed any cargo or shipping container, regardless of structural modifications, on any area or any property in a residentially zoned district that is not subject to the design review process. Property or projects subject to the design review process may apply for this use per ECDC 20.10.010. Administrative waivers shall not apply. {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - Packet Page 120 of 148 The temporary placement of a portable storage container on a residentially zoned lot for the purpose of loading and unloading household contents shall be permitted for a period of time not exceeding thirty (30) days in a calendar year. Tents, tarps and canopy structures which use plastic sheeting, canvas, or other similar pliable materials to cover storage areas, and/or to be used as garages or carports are regulated in residential zones: A. Tents or canopies with a floor area measured to the exterior wall or post exceeding120 square feet are prohibited, except for those used for limited time period for a special event such as a party or wedding not to exceed twenty-four (24) hours. B. Tents and canopies shall comply with setback and height requirements for accessory structures for the zone. Lot coverage requirements also apply. If a tent or canopy is located within 6 feet of another tent(s) or canopy(s) or attached in any way, they shall be considered as one (1) tent or canopy and shall be subject to the provisions of J.3.a and J.3.b for combined floor area and location. D. Temporary storage units do not require a conditional use permit. 17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining. A properly zoned and licensed food or beverage service establishment may temporarily utilize public sidewalks in right-of- way areas immediately adjacent to its establishment. The area authorized for use shall be that area of the immediately adjacent public right-of-way and/or outdoor areas under the lease or ownership of the applicant lying between the applicant's property and the public right-of-way. The area authorized for such use shall not extend beyond the street frontage of the business lessee or property owner. Any building or structure as such terms are defined pursuant to the building code adopted by Chapter 19.00 ECDC shall fully comply with all provisions of the community development code, including, but not limited to, review and approval by the architectural design board. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Page 121 of 148 APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - Packet Page 122 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 7 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 123 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 3/4/09 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, temporary structures in excess of 120 feet of floor space are limited and regulated by the International Building Code but not addressed by the temporary use provisions of Chapter 17.70; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to address the issue of cargo and other temporary storage containers, and WHEREAS, the existing temporary conditional use permit process may result in costs in excess of the storage container or security unit to be utilized; and WHEREAS, these issues were considered at public hearings before the Edmonds Planning Board resulting in a recommendation for adoption of certain provisions as contained here in this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council Community Services and Development Services Committee have reviewed the recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 2009; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to amend Chapter 17.70 regarding temporary uses in order to extend the time in which temporary uses may Packet Page 124 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - be maintained, create an administrative, less expensive process to consider such uses, clarify the definitions and application of temporary use provisions to storage units, tents, canopies and other temporary structures, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 17.70 TEMPORARY USES Sections: 17.70.000 Security units. 17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models. 17.70.010 Other temporary buildings. 17.70.020 Temporary parking lots. 17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses. 17.70.035 Temporary storage units. 17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining. 17.70.000 Security units. A. Definition. A security unit is a building, mobile home, trailer, or vehicle used temporarily in connection with providing security during construction of a structure or building for which a valid building permit has been issued. B. Conditions. A security unit is permitted in all zones under the following conditions: 1. All sanitation facilities and safety measures shall be approved in advance by the building official, health official and other appropriate city officials. 2. Unless earlier directed by the building official pursuant to subsection (B)(3) of this section, security units in the following zones shall be removed after the following time periods: a. In an RS zone, one year; b. All other zones, one year, with a one-year extension if the community development director finds that the project is large Packet Page 125 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - enough to require the longer period, disregarding any self-imposed delay. 3. The building official may order the removal of a security unit if any of the following situations occur: a. The building permit expires or is cancelled. b. The building official issues an occupancy permit. c. The building official determines that the security structure is no longer needed to provide protection against theft or vandalism. 17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models. A. Definition. A project sales office or sales model is space within an otherwise permitted building used temporarily to support the sale of multifamily or condominium units. B. Conditions. A project sales office or sales model is only permitted to occur on the property containing the project or unit(s) being offered for sale. The sales office or sales model shall be discontinued and removed prior to occupancy of the last unit available for sale on the property. C. The granting of a permit for a sales office or sales model shall be reviewed and processed in accordance with the requirements of ECDC 20.95.040, Staff decision – No notice required. 17.70.010 Other temporary buildings. Except as provided below in ECDC 17.70.030, a conditional use permit shall be required to construct a temporary building in any zone. The permit shall be administratively reviewed by staff and shall be valid for a period of one year; provided however, that said permit may be extended by the development services director for a single one-year extension upon submittal of a written application prior to the expiration of the original permit. All the requirements of the zoning district shall be met. An appeal of the staff decision granting or denying such a permit or extension shall be reviewed by the hearing examiner in accordance with the requirements for any other conditional use permit under ECDC 20.100.010, with the decision being appealable to the city council under the procedures applicable to any other conditional use permit. Packet Page 126 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - 17.70.020 Temporary parking lots. See ECDC 17.50.090, which by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses. The city council may, at its sole discretion, approve the installation of a temporary building or mobile office structure to house municipal office and related storage in conjunction with or in anticipation of the construction or remodeling of a municipal facility. Such structure shall be exempt from any other requirements of the zoning code and the decision of the city council shall be final. The city staff is hereby directed to provide for reasonable landscaping and screening of such structure and sufficient drawings and site plans to adequately inform the council of the nature and proposed use of the structure, its design and the anticipated length of time which the structure will be in use. In no event shall the use of such a temporary structure exceed three years without the specific authorization of the city council. 17.70.035 Temporary storage units Defined: A “Canopy” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of fabric or pliable materials supported by any manner, except by air or the contents it protects, and is open without sidewalls or drops on 75 percent or more of the perimeter. B. “Cargo or shipping Container” means a standardized, container designed without an axle or wheels, which was originally, specifically, or formerly designed for or used in the packing, shipping, movement or transportation of freight, articles, goods or commodities. C. “Tent” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of fabric or other pliable material supported by any manner except by air or the contents that it protects. Cargo or shipping containers. No person shall place or cause to be placed any cargo or shipping container, regardless of structural modifications, on any area or any property in a residentially zoned district that is not subject to the design review process. Property or projects subject to the design review process may apply for this use per ECDC 20.10.010. Administrative waivers shall not apply. Packet Page 127 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - The temporary placement of a portable storage container on a residentially zoned lot for the purpose of loading and unloading household contents shall be permitted for a period of time not exceeding thirty (30) days in a calendar year. Tents, tarps and canopy structures which use plastic sheeting, canvas, or other similar pliable materials to cover storage areas, and/or to be used as garages or carports are regulated in residential zones: A. Tents or canopies with a floor area measured to the exterior wall or post exceeding120 exceeding 200 square feet are prohibited, except for those used for limited time period for a special event such as a party or wedding not to exceed twenty-four (24) hours. B. Tents and canopies shall comply with setback and height requirements for accessory structures for the zone. Lot coverage requirements also apply. If a tent or canopy is located within 6 feet of another tent(s) or canopy(s) or attached in any way, they shall be considered as one (1) tent or canopy and shall be subject to the provisions of J.3.a and J.3.b for combined floor area and location. D. Temporary storage units do not require a conditional use permit. 17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining. A properly zoned and licensed food or beverage service establishment may temporarily utilize public sidewalks in right-of- way areas immediately adjacent to its establishment. The area authorized for use shall be that area of the immediately adjacent public right-of-way and/or outdoor areas under the lease or ownership of the applicant lying between the applicant's property and the public right-of-way. The area authorized for such use shall not extend beyond the street frontage of the business lessee or property owner. Any building or structure as such terms are defined pursuant to the building code adopted by Chapter 19.00 ECDC shall fully comply with all provisions of the community development code, including, but not limited to, review and approval by the architectural design board. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect Packet Page 128 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 129 of 148 {WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 7 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 130 of 148 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 4/20/09 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 19.05.010 WORK EXEMPT FROM BUILDING PERMITS AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, in the course of reviewing restrictions on temporary structures, the City Council has determined it to be in the public interest to coordinate the provisions of the zoning code with those of the State Building Code, and WHEREAS, the proposed provisions will not result in changes which lessen the minimum performance standards and objectives contained in the State Building Code as required pursuant to RCW 19.27.060, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 19.05.010 Work exempt from permit is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.05.010 Work exempt from permit. Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the property owner’s responsibility to comply with bulk zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC or ECDC Title 23. In addition to the permit exemptions of ECDC 19.00.010, the following single family dwelling exemptions shall apply: {WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - Packet Page 131 of 148 A. One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor area (measured to the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 200 square feet, with a maximum eave of twelve (12) inches and maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. Vehicle storage structures, such as garages and carports, are not included except as set forth in ECDC Section 19.05.010(J) for canopies. B. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not project more than fifty-four (54) inches from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. C. Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet. D. Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. E. Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. F. Replacement or repair of existing window or doors with no change in size or framing. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. G. Replacement or repair of individual decking, joists, stair treads, or intermediate rails. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply. H. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a permit is not required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC. I. Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, not more than thirty (30) inches above grade and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route. J. Canopies, as defined in ECDC 17.70.035, accessory to a single family dwelling, with a floor area measured to the exterior wall or post not to exceed 200 square feet, for covered storage, carport or similar use. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect {WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 132 of 148 APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. {WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 133 of 148 {WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 19.05.010 WORK EXEMPT FROM BUILDING PERMITS AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 134 of 148 D R A F T M I N U T E S Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Elected Officials Present: Staff Present: Peggy Pritchard-Olson, Council member Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dave Orvis, Chair Ann Bullis, Building Official The committee convened at 6:00 p.m. A. Review proposal to ban plastic bags Bio Park from the City Attorney’s office was present for the discussion. Bio informed the Committee that the City Attorney’s office is conducting research on how other cities have approached adopting and implementing a ban on plastic bags. The intent is to develop options for Edmonds to consider based on this research, including examples of “unintended consequences” that other jurisdictions may have experienced. Options discussed by the Committee to consider would be a broad ban on plastic bags as well as a narrowly tailored ban targeting such businesses as groceries and retailers. Pros and cons for each potential ban option should be presented and discussed. ACTION: City Attorney’s office to develop options for a ban on plastic bags and present these for discussion by the Committee at its next meeting in May. B. Discussion on temporary buildings/uses Ordinance The adoption of this ordinance was previously scheduled on the March 17, 2009 City Council Meeting Consent Agenda, and Council remanded it back to Council Committee for further discussion. Chairman Orvis updated Council Member Olsen that he had contacted the County because their code does not require permits for accessory structures of 200 sf or less and they said the square footage of the accessory structure could be amended by the City. He contacted staff and informed him of this last week so that we could discuss the issue. Ann Bullis, Building Official, confirmed that the City could amend the size of the current accessory structure exemption to 200 sf., but cautioned that state law does not permit amendments that result in a code that is less than the performance standards or objectives of the building code. She explained that the code change that the Director had previously brought before Council included garages, and the International Residential Code contains several code requirements for garages – but is less restrictive for carports. In keeping with the intent of the state law and building code, Ms. Bullis presented the Committee with a draft amendment to ECDC 19.05.010 changing the language of section A and adding a new exemption J for canopies to correlate with the proposed temporary use ordinance. The proposal (1) would increase the size of exempt accessory structures to 200 sf, except for garages and carports, and (2) would allow canopies up to 200 sf to be used as carports. She also gave them a copy of a proposed change to page 5 of the previously proposed ordinance that removed garage from the ordinance and increased the size to 200 sf to coordinate with the proposed Chapter 19 code change. Packet Page 135 of 148 CS/DS Committee Minutes April 14, 2009 Page 2 She reminded them of the definition of canopies in the proposed temporary use ordinance and that they must be open without sidewalls or drops on 75% of the perimeter. Chairman Orvis asked if they would still need to meet setbacks and staff confirmed they did. Rob Chave, Planning Manager, discussed the overall issue of temporary vs. permanent structures as well as setbacks and issues the City’s Code Enforcement Officer was having. This is a complex subject that the full Council may want to examine. The Committee felt the proposed changes were desirable and should be forwarded to the full Council for consideration as part of the overall ordinance. ACTION: Forward the draft ordinance, with the proposed changes, to the full City Council as an agenda item for discussion and potential adoption. C. Discussion on possible amendment regarding minor architectural improvements to nonconforming buildings This subject related to a recent code amendment approved by Council whereby minor architectural improvements – such as bay windows – could be approved for non-conforming buildings, even if the improvement would technically make the building more non-conforming. The idea was to enable some minor improvements to be made to non-conforming buildings without creating impacts on adjoining properties. This amendment was prompted by a situation that arose from improvements being made to an old multi family building during a remodeling process, where bay windows were being added to enhance the building’s appearance, but would not meet the setback rules since the building was already non-conforming. Staff has learned since the ordinance was passed that it will not remedy the specific situation that prompted the code amendment, because the building may be too close to the property lines (and therefore not meet the criteria for minor enhancements outlined in the code amendment). The permit review process is continuing for the building in question, and they have yet to provide the specific survey information necessary to determine the building’s exact status relative to the updated code requirements. Staff will keep the Committee informed as the situation progresses. ACTION: None necessary. D. Discussion on 2x6 construction and improved thermal insulation standards for new construction Chairman Orvis said he put this item on the agenda to discuss what wall insulation is required for 2x6 construction in Edmonds and if it should be more restrictive. Ms. Bullis responded that in residential construction, the prescriptive R-value for wall insulation is R-21, but that it could be less if calculations were done and compensation was made elsewhere in the structure. She explained that Washington State was one of the first states to adopt an energy code and it is one of the most restrictive in the nation. Many aspects of other codes in the nation are patterned after Washington’s energy code. Chairman Orvis said that gave him good information to research and he would come back later if needed. ACTION: None necessary. 2 Packet Page 136 of 148 CS/DS Committee Minutes April 14, 2009 Page 3 3 The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Packet Page 137 of 148 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 3, 2009 Page 5 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 17.70 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING TEMPORARY USES AND TEMPORARY BUILDINGS. Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained this matter had been reviewed by the Community Services/Development Services Committee at their January meeting and they recommended it be forwarded to the City Council for a public hearing. He reviewed the Planning Board’s recommended changes to Chapter 17.70 within three categories, 1) allowing security units in RS zones to be good for one year, 2) allowing other temporary buildings to be reviewed administratively by the Development Services Director, along with extension requests and appeals would be to the Hearing Examiner, and 3) creating a new section regulating temporary storage units; establishing definitions; addressing cargo and shipping containers, and placement of temporary portable storage containers in residential zones; and regulations governing tents, tarps and canopy structures. The current code only allows security units for six months; there have been situations recently when a resident wants to live in their house while another house is being constructed on the site. Given construction complexities, staff proposed to extend that period to one year; the Planning Board concurred with that recommendation. He explained temporary buildings require a Conditional Use Permit, a process before the Hearing Examiner, and often the cost of the CUP exceeds the value of the temporary structure. Staff recommends temporary buildings be reviewed administratively with appeal to the Hearing Examiner. The Planning Board recommends approval of this change in Chapter 17.70.010. With regard to temporary storage, Mr. Bowman explained the City currently required a building permit for any structure with a roof over 120 square feet and it must comply with all applicable setback requirements. The proposed change would clarify issues that have arisen during code enforcement with regard to cargo storage containers or moving pods. The proposed change would also clarify the definition of tents, tarps and canopy structures that use plastic sheeting, canvas or other similar pliable materials to cover storage areas and or be used as garages or carports in residential zones. He displayed several examples of canopies covering recreational vehicles and boats in excess of 120 square feet and/or within the street setback. He also provided photographs of storage containers in excess of 120 square feet. He recalled the issue that resulted in the most discussion at the Planning Board was temporary storage; the question is what the Council wanted the City to look like. He clarified residents were not permitted to build a structure in the setback and thus should not be allowed to install large tent-like structures in the street setback. He noted if a building is over 120 square feet, the building code required a building permit be obtained. None of these temporary structures could obtain a building permit because they would not be able to meet the wind and snow load. Mayor Haakenson recognized Scout Troop 312 from Edmonds United Methodist Church in the audience, noting they are present working on obtaining a citizenship badge. Councilmember Orvis asked if a tent could be temporarily erected to work on a project. Mr. Bowman answered yes as long as it was less than 120 square feet. Councilmember Orvis assumed a tent would be considered an impervious surface. Mr. Bowman agreed, noting that was another reason they were regulated. For Councilmember Wambolt, Mr. Bowman explained a security unit was used to protect a construction site. The code currently allows security units for up to six months; staff has found most need to remain Packet Page 138 of 148 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 3, 2009 Page 6 for a year. Councilmember Wambolt questioned whether 12 months would be long enough. Mr. Bowman responded a provision for an extension could be included. Councilmember Wambolt noted the chapter only referred to temporary storage units in single family zones and asked whether multi family zones should be addressed. Mr. Bowman answered the biggest problems are in the single family zone; development in the multi family zones does not leave much room for this type of structure. Council President Wilson inquired about the number of complaints the City receives annually regarding these structures. Mr. Bowman responded staff received 89 complaints from one resident. He reminded enforcement was by complaint only. Council President Wilson requested in the future staff provide the number of complaints they had received. Mr. Bowman answered there were currently 89 valid complaints filed 18 months ago that staff had delayed enforcement pending the Planning Board’s recommendation and Council action. He explained typically when a temporary building exceeds 120 square feet, enforcement was based on building codes for a structure over 120 square feet. Mayor Haakenson explained there was a great deal of retribution when complaints are filed; a neighbor complained and then the person who is the subject of the complaint then complains about other residents who have the same type of violation. Councilmember Orvis pointed out language in Exhibit 4 addressed parties and weddings and would allow a larger temporary tent structure for a party. Councilmember Bernheim asked whether there was a prohibition on canopies covering RVs in the current code. Mr. Bowman answered yes, if they were over 120 square feet, they required a building permit. Because of the spite complaints, staff froze enforcement action until the Planning Board and Council had an opportunity to review the matter. Councilmember Bernheim clarified a temporary structure over 120 square feet was not allowed under the current or proposed code. Mr. Bowman agreed, explaining the intent was to clarify the regulations. Councilmember Bernheim asked if a canopy over an RV would qualify as a building under the current code. Mr. Bowman answered they would not. They are considered temporary storage and are regulated by 17.170.035(4). Councilmember Bernheim observed that was new language and asked what language in the current code prohibited canopies. Mr. Bowman answered the 120 square foot requirement was in the building code. Councilmember Peterson asked if the building code also addressed the setback. Mr. Bowman stated building in the setback was addressed in the zoning code. He noted it was not consistent to prohibit a resident from building their garage out to the street, yet allow RVs under a tent-like structure in that location. Councilmember Peterson summarized the new language incorporated all the information in one place in the code. Mr. Bowman answered a structure under 120 square feet was treated as an accessory structure. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Planning Board Member Lovell’s suggestion on page 2 of the Planning Board’s November 12, 2008 minutes that 120 square feet be adjusted to be more reasonable and noting a common size was approximately 200 feet. The minutes reflect Mr. Bowman’s comment that the International Building Code recently changed the size limit to 240 feet but the Edmonds code limits the size to 120 square feet and if the Planning Board wanted to change the number, revisions to Title 19 would be required. He questioned Mr. Bowman’s continual reference to 120 square feet in the Packet Page 139 of 148 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 3, 2009 Page 7 International Building Code when that had been changed to 240 feet and recommended the regulations for temporary storage units, 17.70.035(4), be revised to 240 square feet. He noted 89 complaints by one person indicates there are a lot of canopies being used in the City; the approximate value is $240. He noted if the canopy structure failed that was the property owners’ loss. He recalled some Planning Board Members were concerned with regulating temporary structures 120 square feet in size. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Council President Wilson assumed the height limit was 15 feet. Mr. Bowman agreed. He asked Mr. Bowman to comment on the suggestion for 240 square feet. Mr. Bowman responded the International Building Code was changed to 240 square feet and it was later amended to change it back to 120 square feet due to snow and wind load. He advised Mr. Thies explained the change to the Planning Board later in that meeting. He was uncertain why it was changed to 240 square feet and then back to120 square feet. Council President Wilson asked if the Council could change the requirement to 120 square feet. Mr. Bowman explained the City would need to propose an amendment to the State Building Code, a difficult process. Councilmember Bernheim asked the consequence to the 89 residents of the Council adopting the proposed change. Mr. Bowman answered enforcement of those valid complaints would commence. Council President Wilson pointed out this was an example of staff making an interpretation and rather than enforcing those 89 complaints, requesting the Council affirm or change their position. Councilmember Bernheim asked if the zoning code could be changed to 200 square feet. Mr. Bowman answered that would result in a conflict between the building code and zoning code. The purpose for the size restriction was to address snow and wind load. He clarified the standard established the size at 120 square feet. Councilmember Bernheim commented the complaints were not due to snow load but due to aesthetics. Mr. Bowman reiterated large, unsecured structures were in violation of the building code. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained if the zoning code were changed to 200 square feet, one part of the code would permit something that another part of the code would not allow staff to issue a permit for. Councilmember Olson commented the clearer the code could be made, the better. Council President Wilson referred to Chapter 17.70.010 regarding administrative review of other temporary buildings by staff and asked whether the City could issue an administratively reviewed permit that would allow a resident to have a canopy for a boat or RV. Mr. Bowman answered canopies for boats/RVs were regulated under temporary storage units and they could not exceed 120 square feet. Other temporary buildings referred to a temporary structure on a property for a limited period of time. Council President Wilson explained he did not want the City to regulate a 10’ x 12’ tent over a car or RV. He agreed if it were destroyed by wind or snow that was the owners’ responsibility. He commented surface water runoff was a minor issue and a tarp was no less impermeable than the roof of the car or RV. He questioned whether there was actually a public safety issue with canopies and asked how the regulations could be drafted to allow a resident to put up a tent to cover a car or RV such as an administratively reviewed permit. Mr. Bowman responded he was uncertain how that could be allowed other than if a resident had one in their rear yard and no one complained. He assured there was a public safety issue with canopies blowing off as well as an appearance issue. Packet Page 140 of 148 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes March 3, 2009 Page 8 Council President Wilson commented if the Council did not pass the amendment it would allow a resident with a 10’ x 12’ tent to maintain it. Mr. Bowman answered code enforcement did not pursue 10’ x 12’ tents unless they were in the setback area. If it was in the setback, it must comply with the accessory structure regulations. Councilmember Bernheim commented a 10’ x 12’ tent or less was permitted, larger tents were not. Mr. Bowman answered it would be permitted but must meet the requirements for an accessory structure with regard to setbacks, etc. With the 120 square foot constraint, Councilmember Plunkett asked whether staff could envision a CUP process. Mr. Bowman answered only if the property owner applied for a building permit and complied with the building code requirements for wind and snow load. Mr. Snyder reiterated a CUP process was not typically appropriate because the cost of that process may exceed the value of the tent. If a property owner was storing valuable materials, there was a CUP process that could be used. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO ADOPT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION (EXHIBIT 4) AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION ON THE NEXT CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT VOTING NO. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Don Hall, Edmonds, expressed his pleasure at the Council’s attempts to make Edmonds more green, in particular addressing plastic bags. He commented on photographs of sea turtles, sea birds and other marine life dying from plastic bags, commenting banning plastic bags was the only answer because sea animals could not wait for a voluntary or bag fee program to reduce plastic bag use. He recognized San Francisco had banned plastic bags, Los Angeles’ program takes affect in January 2010 and China stopped making the thin plastic bags, saving $37 million barrels of oil per year. He advised further information was available on the banplasticbags.net website. With regard to Styrofoam, Seattle banned its use and he urged the Council to support HB 2089 banning the use of Styrofoam containers in the food service industry. He congratulated the Edmonds retailers who have eliminated or never used plastic bags. Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, announced SustainableEdmonds.org has arranged to meet with Green Drinks Snohomish on March 10 at the Taki Tiki Bar and Grill at 518 Main Street from 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. She explained Green Drinks began meeting in Europe in 1989 and now have regular gatherings in more than 450 cities. Green Drinks is an organic, self-organized network; events are very simple and unstructured and many people have found employment, made friends, developed new ideas, done deals and had moments of serendipity. (Councilmember Wambolt left the meeting at 8:25 p.m.) 6. REVIEW OF CITY POLICY REGARDING SELLING ADVERTISING SPACE. Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh explained this was a review of the existing City practice of selling advertising on public assets. This review was requested by Council President Wilson because of the practice at Yost Pool which may not have been approved by the Council. He explained the banner program was initiated for the Yost Pool summer season of 2003. In December 2002 as a cost saving measure for fiscal year 2003, Council adopted a budget containing a decision package to reduce the season at Yost Pool from 101 days to 60 days. At the February 2003 Council Packet Page 141 of 148 Example of 10 x 20 (200 sf) canopy structure that requires a building permit since perimeter sidewalls not 75% open Example of 14x40 (560 sf) 16 foot high canopy structure that requires a building permit Packet Page 142 of 148 Example of 10x20 (200 sf) canopy structure exempt from building permit Example of 10x20 (200 sf) canopy carport structure exempt from building permit Packet Page 143 of 148 Other Examples... Packet Page 144 of 148 Packet Page 145 of 148 Packet Page 146 of 148 Packet Page 147 of 148 Packet Page 148 of 148