2009.06.02 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
JUNE 2, 2009
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-2305 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of May 26, 2008.
C. AM-2307 Approval of claim checks #111791 through #111955 for $742,449.26 dated May 21, 2009,
and claim checks #111956 through #112045 for $519,546.57 dated May 28, 2009. Approval
of payroll direct deposit and checks #48084 through #48120 for the pay period May 1, 2009
through May 15, 2009 in the amount of $834,166.40.
D. AM-2301 Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Shawn Mitchell (amount undetermined).
E. AM-2306 Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the
Washington State Liquor Control Board, May 2009.
F. AM-2302 Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the Edmonds City Code, Title 10,
to add a new Chapter 10.75, Citizens Economic Development Commission.
G. AM-2309 Ordinance adopting new chapters and repealing certain chapters in Title 20 ECDC relating to
procedures for approving land use development permits; amending various ECDC sections
that reference sections in repealed chapters in Title 20 ECDC.
3. AM-2308
(10 Minutes)
Police Department swearing-in ceremony for Sergeant Bob Barker.
4. AM-2304
(30 Minutes)
Public hearing on utility rate and water tax increase.
5. AM-2294
(45 Minutes)
Public hearing on Ordinance reducing use of single use plastic checkout bags in
Edmonds.
6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed record Review or as Public Hearings.
7. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
8. (15 Minutes)
Packet Page 1 of 244
8. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 244
AM-2305 2.B.
Approve 05-26-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of May 26, 2008.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 05-26-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 08:31 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 09:04 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 09:08 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/28/2009 08:29
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 3 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
May 26, 2009
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Council President Wilson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor (arrived 7:06 p.m.)
D. J. Wilson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager
Rich Lindsay, Parks Maintenance Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda
items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 19, 2009.
3. PRESENTATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION 2040 PLAN BY PUGET SOUND REGIONAL
COUNCIL (PSRC).
Robin McClelland, Program Manager, PSRC, advised a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) will be released May 29, 2009 and mailed to cities. She advised cities would receive the
Executive Summary as well as a CD containing the entire DEIS and appendixes. The DEIS is also
available online at psrc.org. The public comment period on the DEIS begins May 29 and extends through
July 13, 2009. The Transportation Board will review the DEIS and other evaluation criteria as well as
public comment in selecting a preferred alternative for Transportation 2040. She displayed a list of ways
the city and the public could be involved in the process. She noted Edmonds had a considerable stake in
Packet Page 4 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 2
Transportation 2040 due to the regional transportation facilities in the City: Sounder, the ferry and
Community Transit’s bus rapid transit Swift. She encouraged the City to submit a comment letter on the
DEIS and their preference regarding the transportation alternatives.
Ms. McClelland displayed the schedule for Transportation 2040, explaining once the public review and
comment period was concluded, work will begin on a recommendation for a preferred alternative with the
intent of adopting the Transportation 2040 Plan in 2010. She listed the objectives of Transportation 2040
that were derived from the scope process conducted in 2007:
• Make progress on major transportation system issues and inform near-term project decisions
• Create a sustainable financial strategy
• Align with Vision 2040 and the Regional Economic Strategy
• Respond to the 2040 growth forecasts for person and freight travel demand
She identified major factors used in shaping Transportation 2040:
• Sustainable funding –new sources of revenue, reliable, predicable and sufficient
• Environment – climate change and Puget Sound water quality
• Congestion and mobility – regional economic vitality and mobility for people and goods
movement
Ms. McClelland reviewed a graph that illustrated declines in State Gas Tax, commenting even with recent
increases in the gas tax, the purchasing power of the State Gas Tax has been declining since 1991 due to
inflation and fuel efficiency. She displayed another graph that illustrated approximately 2% of revenue
the State, cities and counties collect from residents is spent on transportation investments. She displayed
a chart of Puget Sound greenhouse gas emissions, pointing out more than half of all Puget Sound
greenhouse gas emissions since 2002 come from transportation sources. She highlighted the three key
factors to reducing transportation emissions – vehicles, fuels, and vehicle miles traveled.
Ms. McClelland reviewed a graph regarding seconds of delay on freeways and espressways and on
arterials, explaining if the Regional Growth Strategy goals are not achieved, delays and congestion will
increase dramatically.
She provided a brief summary of the alternatives:
• Baseline (no action) – includes all planned and funded projects and programs
• Alternative 1 – attempts to makes the existing transportation system more efficient with
traditional funding sources
• Alternative 2 – closest to current long range plan, funded from traditional funding sources, adds
substantial roadway and transit capacity
• Alternative 3 – uses tolls to pay for most critical roadway improvements
• Alternative 4 – uses tolls to manage system for system efficiency
• Alternative 5 – largest expansion of high capacity transit, bus service, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities, and alternatives loans. Funded by freeway and arterial tolls and uses traditional
strategies plus tolling to reduce carbon emissions.
A summary was given of what each alternative provides with regard to freeway lane miles, arterial lane
miles, daily bus service hours, daily commuter and light rail service hours, light rail miles, commuter
miles, daily vanpools, auto ferry routes, passenger ferry routes, and off-road/non-motorized miles. It was
noted that Transportation 2040 relies on an integrated evaluation framework to measure the performance
of the alternatives that includes environment, policy analysis and technical analysis. A cost breakdown
and level of investment of each of the alternatives was provided, noting Alternative 2 has the highest cost
and the baseline has the lowest cost. Ms. McClelland identified the current funding rate (current law
revenue) compared to funding needed for the investments in each alternative. Another chart illustrated
Packet Page 5 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 3
current law revenue, revenue from other funding sources and estimated toll revenue compared to the total
cost of each alternative. She displayed a comparison of how Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 decreased some
emissions and alternatives that could result in decreased vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.
She displayed a chart that illustrated how all alternatives provide mobility benefits in varying amounts.
Ms. McClelland provided the following contact information, reiterating the DEIS comment period was
May 29-July 13:
• www.PSRC.org
• Charlie Howard, 206-464-7122 or choward@psrc.org
• Mike Cummings, 206-464-6172 or mcummings@psrc.org
Councilmember Bernheim asked why the revenue enhancements were based on tolling rather than fuel
taxes, gross vehicle weight or emissions and whether any consideration was given to a fee based on
emissions as a funding alternative. Ms. McClelland responded a matrix in the evaluation framework
showed all possible sources of revenue including taxes, fares, fees, etc. Tolling was recommended
because it would fund improvements now as well as possibly provide sufficient funds in the future via
tolling arterials for other projects such as non-motorized. Councilmember Bernheim suggested rather
than a toll, imposing a tax for citizens who purchase a heavier vehicle or high emissions vehicle or
provide a lower tax for a lighter vehicle.
Councilmember Wambolt commented one of the key foundations of the Transportation 2040 was the
economic projections made 2-3 years ago which did not take into account an economic downturn. He
asked whether PSRC had considered revising the job growth numbers due to the current economy,
commenting he felt the projections were too optimistic. Ms. McClelland responded there will be peaks
and valleys along the way that would result in basically the same forecasts in 2040. She noted PSRC had
the ability to adjust projections over time if it became necessary.
Ms. McClelland remarked beginning in July citizens will be able to take Sounder to downtown and then
light rail to the airport.
4. PRESENTATION ON DAYTON STREET PLAZA PARK RENOVATION PROJECT AND
REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE PROJECT.
Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin explained the Dayton Street Plaza is located at the north end
of the former Public Works Building on 2nd and Dayton, along one of the most popular and well used
walking routes between downtown and the waterfront. The site is across the street from Edmonds'
Landing and adjacent to the Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation Art Works facility and the Driftwood
Players Rehearsal Annex. At present, access from the street sidewalk is narrow and uninviting and
landscape materials and the concrete including an inoperable fountain are in poor condition. She
displayed a photograph of the current conditions on the site.
Ms. Chapin provided a conceptual view of the site, explaining the primary goals were to create an outdoor
space that would be inviting to the public and accessible from the street, create a seating wall, improve the
landscaping, and provide sites for outdoor sculptures. To provide visual interest, an artist-made element
will be installed in the hardscape of the plaza.
The project meets many of the goals in the Community Cultural Plan and the recently completed Parks
Comprehensive Plan updates. Both plans recognize that economic development and community building
are promoted by the physical spaces and places provided for citizens and visitors. Edmonds is seen by
residents and visitors as a pedestrian friendly and culture-oriented community. The site provides an
opportunity to meet the priorities expressed by citizens during the current planning process with regard to
place-making in the downtown. She described the public process for the project including an open house
in July 2008 where the plans were received favorably.
Packet Page 6 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 4
One of the goals in the Community Cultural Plan is to encourage effective partnerships that support
opportunities for cultural development and awareness of cultural assets. She identified financial support
provided by partners in the project including a $25,000 contribution from the Edmonds Arts Festival
Foundation; $5,000 from the Hubbard Family Foundation and $2,500 from Edmonds in Bloom.
The completed design for the renovation was presented to the Planning Board in January 2009. The 2008
- 2014 Capital Improvement Program and the 2009 - 2010 City Budget contain funding for this project in
the 132 Fund in the amount of $135,000 which includes the donations. Ms. Chapin briefly described the
landscaping, commenting much of the existing vegetation was retained on the site.
Councilmember Plunkett asked about the 132 Fund. Ms. Chapin explained Fund 132 was created for
projects using funds from Fund 125 (Real Estate Excise Tax) that also have grant funding.
Councilmember Plunkett emphasized this project was funded via REET and not General Funds.
Councilmember Orvis asked about the former Public Works site. Ms. Chapin explained it was currently
used by the City as well as leased to other entities. Councilmember Orvis asked for assurance that the
proposed project would not eliminate any options for that building in the future. Ms. Chapin answered it
would not.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE DAYTON STREET PLAZA PARK
RENOVATION PROJECT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Judy Stead, Edmonds, referred to the June 2 public hearing on the City’s plans to again increase taxes
on utility and water usage by citizens. The City also planned to again increase property taxes through a
“so-called family levy” in November. She described her perplexity with the Council’s logic in proposing
these tax increases by quoting a comment made by Whoopi Goldberg on “The View” on March 6, 2009,
“You remember that movie Network? If you are just fed up, at some point just lean out your window and
scream I’m mad as hell cause that’s what’s happening to me. I’m losing my mind because I don’t
understand why. They have this whole thing about taxing the wealthy. Now I don’t mind that, I don’t
mind paying a little more tax because I make a good living. But I don’t want to get it coming and going.
I don’t want to get the federal tax raised and the state tax raised and the phone tax raised and the
television tax raised and then the city tax raised. Back off me.” Ms. Stead hoped the Council shared
Whoopi’s sentiments and urged them to back off the citizens of Edmonds.
George Murray, Edmonds, referred to the amendments to Chapter 20, suggesting Council separate out
the policy change that keeps the Council involved. The Council could then approve Chapter 20 and retain
the provisions that keep the Council in the process which would allow them to see how it worked with the
new, clearer standards. The citizens want the Council to remain involved and when this issue arose in
July 2006, the Council also wanted to remain involved. He enumerated the benefits of the Council
staying involved: it gives visibility to the process, gives the Council feedback on the policies they
develop, acts as a break between arbitrary Planning Board or Hearing Examiner decisions and promotes a
solution between appellants, the Planning Board and the Hearing Examiner. With a more clear code, the
Council could make better decisions and avoid the emotional aspects that concern Mr. Snyder.
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, explained before the City began picking up garbage a couple years ago, a
number of volunteers picked up garbage at the dog park. She and her husband had dog park duty this
weekend and on Sunday evening they found overflowing garbage cans at the dog park and garbage strewn
throughout Marina Park. She emailed Park Manager Rich Lindsay and was told the garbage had been
Packet Page 7 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 5
picked up Sunday morning. She applauded the City’s Parks & Recreation Department employees for
their hard work. She reiterated the suggestion she made at the Citizen Levy Review Committee meetings
to install a parking fee kiosk at Marina Beach Park as a pilot project. She reported on the popularity of
the dog park; they use 12,000 bags a month in the winter/spring months and 24,000 bags in the summer.
She relayed dog park and Marina Park users’ willingness to pay for parking, remarking the fees collected
could fund 1-2 City employees. She noted 27% of the State’s park budget was from user fees.
Rich Senderoff, Edmonds, described his visit to the new ACE Hardware and his inability to find the
entrance or a sign directing him to the entrance. He was told by the store manager who he encountered on
the street that the City would not allow him to put up better entrance signage. He assumed for a business
to be successful, customers must be able to find the entrance and recommended the City proactively work
with a new business before they opened particularly in an unfinished building. He summarized the
Council talked about economic development but did not seem to recognize how to help ensure new
businesses get off to a good start let alone create a vision that finds synergy between residents, businesses,
property management companies and developers.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, referred to Councilmember Wambolt’s report regarding meetings with Fire
District 1 and relayed residents’ concern with the source of the money and the cost to the Edmonds
taxpayer. Next, he advised the Sno-Isle Library was considering asking voters for an increase and
suggested the Council state their position with regard to a Sno-Isle Library levy. He also informed that
the Edmonds School District planned to place a capital levy on the 2010 ballot.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, encouraged the public to speak at the June 2 public hearing regarding the
utility tax increase on water. Next, he encouraged the Council to discontinue their discussion regarding a
plastic bag ban, finding that effort a waste of time. He noted citizens were more concerned about the
economy, the budget, etc. and the Council should be discussing how to reduce salaries and realign staff.
Susan Paine, Edmonds, encouraged the Council not to cut the street trees downtown. She understood
they disrupted the sidewalk but encouraged the Council to consider other ways to address that issue such
as grates. She explained the trees downtown offer a human scale in an urban environment. She preferred
the larger trees that contributed to ambiance of the City’s quaint older style to the recently planted small
trees that do not contribute to the visual environment.
In response to Mr. Rutledge’s comment regarding Fire District 1, Councilmember Wambolt clarified the
City did not need to come up with any money; Fire District 1 needed to identify the funds to purchase the
Fire Department’s capital equipment. The $1 million per year he referred to at the last meeting was the
savings to the City’s General Fund if the proposal with Fire District 1 were finalized.
6. CONSIDERATION OF AND POTENTIAL ACTION ON THE ORDINANCE AMENDING
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 20 RELATING TO
ESTABLISHING PERMIT TYPES, PROCESS REQUIREMENTS, NOTICE REQUIREMENTS,
CONSISTENCY WITH SEPA, OPEN RECORD HEARING PROCEDURES, CLOSED RECORD
APPEALS, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
After listening to public comment at several hearings and during public comment, City Attorney Scott
Snyder indicated there were three issues that needed to be addressed, 1) the perception that the changes in
Title 20 would limit communications between the public and the Council, 2) a belief that having matters
come to the Council will give citizens “home field advantage,” and 3) a confusion of the issue of legal
cause with legal liability. Regardless of whether the Council stays in the quasi judicial role or not,
citizens’ expectations of how the Council would act in a quasi judicial capacity must be reasonable. He
recalled a comment at the last Council meeting praising the way the hearing regarding short term rentals
Packet Page 8 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 6
was conducted. He pointed out when the Council sat as a legislative body, people could say anything, the
Council could consider any facts and talk to anyone; there were few limits on what the Council could
consider. Conversely, when the Council sat in a quasi judicial capacity, there were strict rules regarding
communications with the public and what the Council could consider.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine requires the Council not have contact with any of the parties or their
constituents regarding pending matters. The Council cannot engage in comment with the public on
matters going through the design process if they come to the Council and all the Council can consider is
the record created at the initial proceeding which the Council does not conduct.
Mr. Snyder commented there was a perception at the public hearing that if the Council remained involved
in appeals, citizens have a home field advantage. He agreed there were close cases and if the Council was
the decision-maker, they could decide those close cases. One of the difficulties and the reason WCIA was
concerned was as elected politicians, the Council was used to trying to satisfy the public’s will. He
quoted from Washington cases that community displeasure cannot be the basis for permit denial. He
noted one of the reasons City Council decisions were “tagged” more often than Hearing Examiner
decisions with liability claims and large awards was the process was not as controlled and things tend to
be said to Councilmembers that create a record that gives rise to liability.
He provided another quote, while community sentiment can be instrumental in the development of zoning
requirements in the planning process, it cannot alone form the basis of the zoning decision. He pointed
out if the Council retains the role of a quasi judicial body, it must apply the criteria in the code in the
same manner the Hearing Examiner does.
He acknowledged WCIA was concerned with liability for Councilmember decisions versus Hearing
Examiner decisions. It was not necessarily that Hearing Examiner decisions were overturned more or less
than City Councils, but City Council decisions more often gave rise to large liability awards than Hearing
Examiners do because of the surrounding circumstances. He referred to Councilmember Orvis’ reference
to the Mission Springs case where the Spokane City Council got involved in a permit they should not
have. He noted a more relevant case was the West Mark City of Burien case that resulted in a $10.7
million award for delays in the issuance of the SEPA permit. In that instance, the 216-unit apartment
building on the waterfront in Burien was extremely unpopular in the community. Councilmember Orvis
asked whether the Edmonds Hearing Examiner did SEPA appeals now. Mr. Snyder responded SEPA
appeals were one of the items proposed to be removed.
Mr. Snyder explained one of the reasons liability was a concern to City Attorneys, City Councils and the
WCIA was due to the way the rules have been established. Under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA)
each party bears its own costs in Superior Court. If the case is appealed, the loser pays which is the
reason most LUPA cases are resolved at the Superior Court level. During the course of Regulatory
Reform, the legislature created incentives/penalties for City Council to stay as neutral as possible.
Chapter 64.40 of the WAC establishes damages, attorney fees and costs for any delay in the permit
process beyond 120 days. If a decision is found to be arbitrary and capricious the City is subject under
constitutional law and state statute for delay damages and takings claims. RCW 82.02.020 creates
liability for the City monetarily, attorney fees and damages if excessive development fees are required.
He summarized it was not that the City Council could not do it right, he assured they could. But citizens
should understand regardless of whether they go to the Hearing Examiner or the City Council, what they
say will be limited, how they say it will be limited, what the Council can consider is limited and
community displeasure cannot play any role in the decision-making process. At the legislative level,
public sentiment is an important factor.
Packet Page 9 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 7
Councilmember Orvis agreed if a Hearing Examiner or a City Council decided to impose arbitrary and
capricious standards on an applicant, they could be tagged for damages. And if the Council in order to
avoid being arbitrary and capricious began to ignore law, they would encounter a problem with WCIA
such as in Ridack v. Gunderson. Mr. Snyder commented Ridack v. Gunderson was an isolated situation
and the remedy today would be a LUPA appeal. He emphasized the Council or the Hearing Examiner
must enforce the code the way it is written and it did not matter if that was unpopular.
Councilmember Orvis referred to a Seattle case where the mayor waived fire codes to allow the homeless
to continue to occupy a building. The building subsequently burned and the city took liability. Seattle
has also been tagged for being arbitrary and capricious. He commented the Council was protected in both
those situations if they fairly and objectively argued code. Mr. Snyder explained the public appeared to
have a perception that the rules would be more favorable by retaining the Council as the decision-maker.
He emphasized the rules must be the same regardless of where the appeal takes place.
With regard to the Council’s role in shoreline decisions, Planning Manager Rob Chave explained
shoreline regulations originated with the federal government via the Coastal Zone Management Act and
the federal government allowed states to develop a method of regulating the shorelines. In turn, the state
basically delegates to local governments the ability to regulate shorelines by adopting the Shoreline
Master Program (SMP) which is approved by the state, essentially the city is acting as an agent of the
state. Exempt activities under shorelines are identified in the WAC and the city has no control over
whether they are exempt or not. Shoreline substantial development permits go to the Hearing Examiner
and are potentially appealable to the City Council. Once the local decision is made, it is sent to the state
where there is a waiting period during which the state assesses the decision to determine whether they
want to challenge it. Shoreline Conditional Use Permits (CUP) and variances are approved by the state.
Mr. Chave reviewed an example of the ability to appeal: In 2003 Washington State Ferries (WSF) asked
for a CUP under shorelines for the overhead loading; they had allowed a previous CUP to lapse. The
permit went to the Hearing Examiner and conditions were imposed setting a timeframe for the overhead
loading to be in that location and at the expiration of that time period it needed to be moved or the state
needed to apply for another CUP. The state did not appeal the Hearing Examiner’s decision to the City
Council. The local decision was finalized and sent to the State Department of Ecology (DOE) for
approval, denial or imposition of different conditions on the CUP. DOE agreed with the Hearing
Examiner and formalized the decision. WSF appealed DOE’s decision to the Shoreline Hearings Board.
The Hearings Board agreed with DOE and the Hearing Examiner and imposed the same conditions. WSF
eventually appealed to Superior Court where the shoreline decision was nullified on the basis the
overhead loading was an essential public facility which overrides the local decision-making authority. He
summarized even with the Council’s ability to act as an appellate in shoreline cases, the Council’s
decision could be completely ignored.
Councilmember Wambolt recalled a citizen stated if this change were made, staff could allow developers
to waive shoreline environmental regulations, reduce setbacks or allow taller buildings and these issues
could not be appealed to elected officials. He asked whether building heights could be changed without
the approval of the City Council. Mr. Chave answered no, advising those requirements were in the
zoning code or the SMP.
Councilmember Orvis recalled the Hearing Examiner had approved at least two height limit variances for
PFDs. Mr. Chave responded height variances are occasionally heard by the Hearing Examiner and are
very narrowly decided. Shoreline variances were different. Councilmember Orvis asked whether the
Hearing Examiner had considered setback variances. Mr. Chave agreed there could be and have been
decisions by the Hearing Examiner on setbacks.
Packet Page 10 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 8
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
FOR APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AMENDING ECDC CHAPTER 20.
Councilmember Wambolt commented he was sensitive to concerns that staff could do things that the
Council was not aware of. He recalled this occurred with several condominium projects that received
ADB approval, yet what was constructed was not what was approved due to changes approved by staff.
However, he questioned whether all of a developer’s minor changes should be presented to the Council.
He was satisfied with the amendments to Chapter 20 and appreciated the tutorial provided by Mr. Snyder.
If these amendments created a great deal of problems, they could be changed.
Councilmember Plunkett agreed the Council was capable of sitting as quasi judicial members because the
City has one of the most experienced mayors in the state who has demonstrated the ability to fairly and
judiciously mediate quasi judicial hearings. The City has the best municipal attorney in the state. The
City Council had proven numerous times in quasi judicial hearings that they are judicious and thoughtful.
He did not support moving more land use decisions to attorneys, judges, Hearing Examiner and staff and
reducing public hearings at the Council level. He did not support the proposed motion.
Councilmember Orvis was opposed to the motion because it limited the public’s ability to communicate
with the Council by not allowing oral argument. He recalled Betty Larman’s presentation to the Council
regarding Old Mill Town was legal, addressed the code, did not stray from the record and cited examples
that showed how the application did not meet the code. That type of argument would no longer be
allowed; only written argument would be allowed. Second, he did support an ordinance that would allow
staff or the Hearing Examiner to change and waive codes via a variance. He stressed changing code was
the Council’s job and the Council should hear all variances with a recommendation to the Council by the
Hearing Examiner. He noted variances could be made for height limits, setbacks and for the
environment. With regard to liability protection, he noted the Planning Board did not cite any Council
actions that had exposed the City to liability. This Council has a great quasi judicial record and have been
overturned only twice recently, both times when the Council agreed with the Hearing Examiner.
Councilmember Orvis commented the WCIA’s statewide recommendation was due to other Councils’
mistakes; the Edmonds Council has not been overturned for disagreeing with the Hearing Examiner.
Recently a Hearing Examiner made a decision that was not appealable to the Council but the Council
became involved when the City was sued. He referred to a Snohomish County case versus a Lutheran
Church where the County agreed with the Hearing Examiner decision on a CUP and was tagged for being
arbitrary and capricious. He summarized arbitrary and capricious decisions could be made by a Council
or a Hearing Examiner and allowing the Hearing Examiner to make a final decision did not protect the
City from liability.
Councilmember Wambolt noted Councilmember Orvis’ comments about the Council’s record were likely
correct; fortunately quasi judicial hearings were not common occurrences. He noted although the current
City Council had a good record, that may not be the case for future Councils.
Councilmember Bernheim spoke in favor of retaining City Council review because it kept the Council
directly involved. For appeals of the Hearing Examiner’s decision, the Council can defer to the Hearing
Examiner’s review. In cases when the right decision could be either way he wanted the City Council to
make those decisions. He agreed these appeals did not occur very often and therefore it was not a burden
on the Council. It would keep the Council involved and when there was room for discretion, it allowed
the Council to exercise it.
Council President Wilson recalled he made the original motion to direct staff to prepare the ordinance.
Since then he has wavered in his decision. He recalled when the issue arose in regard to a PRD, he did
Packet Page 11 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 9
not support sending PRDs to the Hearing Examiner. He referred to Councilmember Orvis’ comment that
the Hearing Examiner could approve variances for setback and heights, a situation he was not comfortable
with. He was uncertain how the Council could separate the issue of appeal to the City Council and adopt
the other amendments to Chapter 20.
Councilmember Orvis suggested amending the table on page 3 of Exhibit A
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT TO
INSTRUCT STAFF TO RESTORE THE TABLE TO THE COUNCIL’S EXISTING AUTHORITY
AND TO RESTORE ORAL ARGUMENT.
Council President Wilson preferred to require written argument to prevent any new information from
entering the record. He suggested amending the motion to require written argument.
Councilmember Orvis advised he would not support the motion without oral argument.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE
SECOND.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
DIRECT STAFF TO RESTORE THE COUNCIL’S EXISTING AUTHORITY REGARDING
DECISIONS.
Mr. Snyder clarified staff would revise the table in 20.01.030.C to reflect the Council’s current decision-
making authority.
For Councilmember Bernheim, Mr. Snyder offered to return with an ordinance in a legislative format and
to highlight the changes made to the table. Mr. Snyder suggested Councilmember Orvis reword the
amendment to instruct staff to return with a revised ordinance.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT WITH THE AGREEMENT OF
THE SECOND.
UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION FAILED (3-4); COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON,
PETERSON, AND WAMBOLT IN FAVOR; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, BERNHEIM AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
DIRECT STAFF TO BRING BACK A REVISED ORDINANCE IN WHICH TABLE C IS
REVISED TO REFLECT THE COUNCIL’S CURRENT AUTHORITY. MOTION CARRIED (6-
1), COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT VOTING NO.
Mayor Haakenson commented although he appreciated Councilmember Plunkett’s comments about his
ability to run a closed record review, he viewed them as the single worst thing the legislature had given
City Councils. He noted the anguish on citizens’ faces in the audience when they are unable to speak to
the Council about the subject matter in a closed record review. Second, both sides have attempted to get
new information into a closed record review which was not allowed. He summarized it was very difficult
for staff and him to determine what was new information and as a result it may get into the record and the
Council may make their decision on information that should not have been provided. He concluded
closed record reviews were a bad deal for citizens and he urged the Council if nothing else to require
written information to avoid new information being inserted into the record.
Packet Page 12 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 10
For Council President Wilson, Mr. Snyder advised Sections 20.07.005.C and D required written
argument.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, TO
ALLOW ORAL ARGUMENT.
Councilmember Bernheim commented although information may be entered into the record by allowing
oral argument, whether the new information became part of the findings of fact and became a basis for the
Council’s decision-making was more important than what was actually said. He did not object to
continuing to allow oral argument, finding it helped clarify the issue for the decision-maker.
Councilmember Plunkett commented in all past quasi judicial decisions, the oral argument was very
important and his ability to adjudicate would be diminished without hearing oral argument. He pointed
out Mayor Haakenson and Mr. Snyder did an excellent job monitoring the proceedings.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, PLUNKETT AND
BERNHEIM IN FAVOR; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS
OLSON, PETERSON, AND WAMBOLT OPPOSED.
7. REPORT REGARDING THE STREET TREE PLAN AND REMOVAL AND REPLANTING OF
STREET TREES AT 5TH & DAYTON.
Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh recalled on April 22 Council President Wilson scheduled a
review of the Street Tree Plan in advance of the removal and replacement of trees at 5th & Dayton. He
explained the Street Tree Plan was Appendix F of the revised 2006 Streetscape Plan adopted by Council,
making it part of the Comprehensive Plan. He read the vision of the Street Tree Plan, stating it exists to
benefit the local community and business climate through enhancement of the identity and character of
the downtown, gateways, neighborhoods and primary roads of travel. Street trees provide seasonal
interest, summer shade and a transition between the street and adjacent buildings and properties. The
Plan recommends species which provide these benefits, be hardy, relatively easy to maintain and tolerant
of urban conditions. The City may modify and amend these tree species selections in the future.
He recalled concern were raised that the tree caliper of recently planted trees did not match the
recommended size of 3” caliper. He explained it was important to understand why entire intersections or
row of trees were planted at the same time. He identified areas in the Plan where the caliper discrepancy
and the need to replant as parcels were addressed:
• Species Selection – there are 14 criteria in this section with the final criteria being "Appropriate
mature size and form for their location.”
• Terms of Maintenance – current mature trees have no root barriers to encourage downward roots.
• Implementation – when possible plant entire blocks or series of blocks in the same time sidewalks
are reconstructed which will provide uniformity in size and form.
• Downtown Plan – specific street trees are identified for planting on particular stretches in the
downtown. All trees shown on the map shall be a minimum 3” caliper unless otherwise
approved.
• Tree Planting Procedures – planting procedure recommendations address avoiding conflict of
roots with underground utilities and pavement. Installation size and branching height should be
chosen to maximize the tree’s survival rate. In retail, commercial and mixed use areas, install
minimum 3” caliper with minimum 7-foot branching height unless otherwise approved by the
City.
Packet Page 13 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 11
Mr. McIntosh summarized the tree size was directly related to the size of the root ball that should be
successfully planted in the available space as well as the availability and uniformity of the appropriate
species. Unfortunately in much of the downtown area root ball size was limited due to congested below
ground utilities. Large root balls could be pruned but survivability of the tree is jeopardized. In the past,
qualified Public Works and Parks staff have evaluated conditions to make these field determinations.
Public Works Director Noel Miller explained this summer the City will be undertaking a street pavement
overlay project on Dayton Street from Sunset to the 5th Avenue intersection. As part of this project, the
northeast and northwest sidewalk corners are required to be modified to meet current ADA standards. In
addition the existing street trees are slated to be removed and replaced. The current trees have become
unsuitable due to branches breaking off and the roots lifting the sidewalk. He displayed a photograph of
the northwest corner, explaining the Sweet Gum trees were planted at least 25 years ago and are not
recommended in the Street Tree Plan because branches break off and their roots lift the sidewalk. He
identified a tree in the photograph where the tree canopy broke off in a storm, severely disfiguring the
tree. The canopies of the other Sweet Gum trees on the corner were in jeopardy as the trees grew larger.
Because the City is aware the trees are creating a hazardous situation by lifting the sidewalk and falling
branches, the City’s insurance carrier, WCIA, requires the hazard be eliminated. In accordance with the
Street Tree Plan the replacement trees will be October Glory Maples. Two trees will be planted at each
intersection corner; they will grow to approximately 40 feet in height and 35 feet in diameter when
mature. The fall leaf color will be deep red to purple. To provide uniformity the caliper will match the
October Glory recently planted in front of Old Milltown and the Bank of Washington on the opposite side
of the intersection. He advised this work was part of an ongoing street tree replacement program for the
downtown area that began in the 1990s and was formalized in 2001. Approximately half the street trees
have been replaced. He assured the oak trees at 5th and Main were suitable and there were no plans to
remove those trees in the foreseeable future.
Mr. McIntosh acknowledged the Street Tree Plan requests and requires 3” caliper trees but allows
discretion to make site decisions. He noted that discretion is often necessary because a 3” caliper tree
cannot fit or because 3” caliper trees are not available. He reviewed the language proposed to be changed
in the Downtown Plan and the Tree Planting Procedures to change the caliper from 3” to 2.”
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether WCIA required the trees to be removed. Mr. Miller answered
as part of the audit of Public Works and Parks practices, WCIA periodically looks at operations. They are
interested in reducing liability to pedestrians on the sidewalks due to claims for tripping on sidewalks.
Staff has attempted minor repairs to the sidewalks including replacing panels or grinding the edges but
Sweet Gum trees are notorious for lifting sidewalks. The WCIA representative said the City had no
option but to replace the trees. He noted replacing the sidewalks and installing ADA ramps likely would
result in cutting into the existing trees’ roots, further impacting the survivability of the trees.
Councilmember Bernheim emphasized the Plan stated 3” caliper trees yet none of the recently planted
street trees were 3” caliper. Mr. Miller recalled the consultant who prepared the Plan thought it would be
feasible to have 3” caliper trees; however, planting that size of a tree in the planter areas on City
sidewalks has not been possible. He noted these limitations were not identified when the Street Tree Plan
was developed and approved by the Council.
Council President Wilson commented this was a tricky issue because no one wanted to cut down trees,
have the sidewalk lifted or have a negative impact on the City’s charm. His fundamental concern was not
losing the trees at 5th and Main and although staff assured they would be retained, he recalled last year at
a Community Services/Development Services meeting, those trees were identified for replacement. He
Packet Page 14 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 12
was concerned with the City taking action based on the request of WCIA and feared tree
removal/replacement would spread throughout the City.
Council President Wilson asked how long it took a tree to reach a mature height of 40 feet tall and 35 feet
tall. Parks Maintenance Manager Rich Lindsay referred to the tree whose canopy broke off, commenting
the trees were susceptible to wind damage, were a poor choice for a street tree and should be replaced.
He advised the trees would reach full growth in approximately 20 years. He noted for the species
identified in the plan, little more than 3” caliper was available. He described the October Glory Maple
selected for that intersection. He anticipated a big difference would be noticeable in the trees in five
years. Irrigation installed at the street corners would assist with growth as compared to trees in tree grates
that are not irrigated.
Council President Wilson asked what intersection was next in the implementation of the Street Tree Plan.
Mr. Lindsay responded it would likely be 4th and Main where the Ash trees were dying. Those Ash trees
were not suitable for that location because they require a great deal of room for the roots to grow and
spread. Council President Wilson expressed concern with the “slash and burn” appearance of the
intersection for a period of time. Mr. Lindsay agreed it was disappointing when trees had to be replaced.
Council President Wilson suggested staggering tree replacement on opposite corners every two years.
Mr. Lindsay advised the Street Tree Plan established a vision that staff was attempting to carry out.
Mayor Haakenson advised trees were being replaced incrementally and residents have been appreciative
of the improvements to the sidewalks.
At Mayor Haakenson’s request, Mr. Miller displayed a photograph of the trees that were planted west of
the intersection in 2006, noting they had filled out considerably from their original height of 15-20 feet.
Councilmember Wambolt noted the trees on the south corner of the intersection were also removed in the
past couple years. He asked why the pavement overlay did not extend beyond Sunset and through Harbor
Square. Mr. Miller answered there was more utility work to be done on that street due to double tracking.
Temporary repairs would be made to the pavement in that area now and it would be repaved next year.
Councilmember Peterson relayed gardeners have indicated planting a 2” tree particularly if the root ball is
not disturbed results in a healthier tree. Mr. Lindsay agreed, noting the City typically planted 1½ - 2”
caliper street trees. He noted consideration had even been given to establish a nursery in one of the City’s
parks but there is no suitable space.
Mayor Haakenson asked if a smaller caliper tree had a better chance of survival than a larger caliper tree.
Mr. Lindsay agreed it did, noting the City’s tree grates were 36” and 48”. He preferred the 36” grate
because there were less tripping hazards but it resulted in a smaller hole that could accommodate a
smaller caliper tree.
Councilmember Peterson commented the Council’s action was not about what 5th & Dayton would look
like next week but what it would look like in 25 years. The Council must plan for the future with regard
to street trees, economic issues, and environmental issues.
Councilmember Orvis asked the cost to replace a street tree. Mr. Lindsay answered the purchase price
was approximately $120 – $250. Larger caliper trees were considerably more expensive.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDED ACTION.
Packet Page 15 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 13
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether the Council could adopt the changes to the Street Tree Plan
which was part of the Comprehensive Plan. He explained his intent in raising this issue was to enhance
the City’s charm. Mr. McIntosh answered the Street Tree Plan was part of the Streetscape Plan which
was part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment will be reviewed by the Planning
Board who will hold a public hearing and forward a recommendation to the City Council where it would
be considered along with other Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Mayor Haakenson commented the Council could decide not to amend the Plan and allow staff to continue
with their current practice.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The recommended action is as follows:
STREET TREE PLAN
AMEND LANGUAGE IN STREET TREE PLAN AS FOLLOWS TO BETTER REFLECT
CURRENT PRACTICES IN REGARD TO REMOVING AND REPLANTING STREET TREES.
AS AN ELEMENT OF THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARINGS
WILL BE SCHEDULED AT BOTH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL FOR
CONSIDERATION TO BECOME PART OF 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS.
1. DOWNTOWN PLAN, PG. 120.
CURRENT LANGUAGE: ALL TREES SHOWN ON THE MAP SHALL BE MINIMUM 3 INCH
CALIPER UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE: ALL TREES ON THE MAP SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2
INCH CALIPER UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BUY CITY STAFF FOLLOWING
EVALUATION OF EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATE
SPECIES.
2. TREE PLANTING PROCEDURES, PG. 124.
CURRENT LANGUAGE: IN RETAIL/COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE AREAS, INSTALL
MINIMUM 3 INCH CALIPER TREES WITH MINIMUM 7 FOOT BRANCHING HEIGHT
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE: IN THE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE AREAS,
INSTALL MINIMUM 2 INCH CALIPER TREES WITH 7 FOOT BRANCHING HEIGHT UNLESS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITY STAFF FOLLOWING EVALUATION OF EXISTING SITE
CONDITIONS AND AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATE SPECIES
REMOVAL AND REPLANTING OF STREET TREES AT 5TH & DAYTON
PROCEED WITH REPLACEMENT STREET TREES AT THIS INTERSECTION TO MATCH IN
SIZE AND SPECIES OF THOSE RECENTLY REPLACED AT OLD MILLTOWN AND THE
BANK OF WASHINGTON.
8. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN A RIGHT OF ENTRY AND INDEMNITY
AGREEMENT WITH HORIZON BANK FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING AND
REPLACING FRONTAGE TREES ALONG DAYTON STREET.
Public Works Director Noel Miller explained this was reviewed at the City Council committee meeting
and deferred until the Council had an opportunity to review the Street Tree Plan. He explained the trees
on the north side of Dayton west of the 5th & Dayton intersection were creating an uneven walking
surface on the sidewalk and are proposed to be replaced. These trees were required to be planted at the
time of development 30 years ago. There are ways to manage the roots when trees were initially planted
to prevent them from lifting the sidewalk.
Mr. Miller displayed a photograph and identified the existing trees. He advised three of the trees are on
Horizon Bank property which requires a Right of Entry to remove and replace the trees.
Packet Page 16 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 14
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A RIGHT OF ENTRY AND INDEMNITY
AGREEMENT WITH HORIZON BANK FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING AND
REPLACING FRONTAGE TREES ALONG DAYTON STREET. MOTION CARRIED (6-1),
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM VOTING NO.
9. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS
Council President Wilson reported the Lake Ballinger Forum received a draft Strategic Action Plan for
the Lake Ballinger Watershed and will begin the process of finalizing it in preparation for presenting it to
the Council for approval. The Forum meeting also included discussion regarding the formation of an
independent taxing authority to manage the basin.
Councilmember Orvis reported the Health Board will again be considering cuts next week. Much of it
will be in environmental health; with less development applications, there is less need for staff. The
Board will also consider cuts to First Steps Home Visiting, a program where a health worker visits low
income, at-risk infants and their parents. The clinic element of the program will be retained.
Consideration is also being given to closing the STD clinic in Everett because STDs can be treated
outside the clinic.
Councilmember Wambolt reported the May 11 Port Commission meeting included discussion regarding
the redevelopment of Harbor Square. The Commission approved a scope of work and proposal for LMN
Architects and Burke and Associates to update and refine the conceptual refined plan for the Harbor
Square Business Complex and to provide a review and report with potential revenues, economic analysis
of redevelopment potential, City of Edmonds tax revenue, in an amount not to exceed $50,000. They
anticipate a report will be presented by the end of September. The new Executive Director started work
on May 18.
At the May 18 meeting the Port Commission authorized the Executive Director to sign a ground lease
with the yacht club for their new building. The yacht club has obtained building permits from the City
and construction is anticipated to begin in early June with completion expected no later than March 1,
2010. He noted the loan for the building was $3.2 million. The building will be located in the parking lot
north of the Commission offices.
Councilmember Plunkett reported the Downtown Parking Committee proposed signs at 5th & Main to
direct visitors to the public parking at the Public Safety Complex. Cultural Services Manager Frances
Chapin is considering artistic signs.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson had no report.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Bernheim reported he visited the Edmonds Food Bank at the United Methodist Church.
He encouraged everyone to visit on a Tuesday to see the number of people they serve and how well they
are served. He displayed a 100% recycled food container, an alternative to Styrofoam.
Councilmember Orvis reported the Health Board is considering reducing the services they provide to
daycares.
Packet Page 17 of 244
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
May 26, 2009
Page 15
Councilmember Wambolt referred to a letter to the editor expressing concern that the Council’s top
objectives were in regard to sustainability. He noted the Council page on the City’s website contained
information from the 2009 retreat, Working Toward Sustainability, and the Council’s top six goals. He
agreed these were the Council’s goals with regard to sustainability, however, because there were no other
goals, it appears to the public these were the Council’s only goals. He suggested Council President
Wilson write a letter to the press and have revisions made to the Council’s web page.
Council President Wilson responded he planned to address this in the Edmonds Beacon column this week.
He suggested the Community Outreach Committee work with Chief Information Officer Carl Nelson
regarding enhancing the Council page on the website.
Mayor Haakenson suggested Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman could revise the language
on the website regarding the sustainability goals.
Councilmember Peterson relayed he volunteered at the Edmonds Food Bank at the United Methodist
Church in the past and was proud the community did such a great job providing a wonderful service.
Further, he thanked Mayor Haakenson and the organizers of the Memorial Day service at the Edmonds
Cemetery. He encouraged the public to attend this great community event.
Mayor Haakenson relayed the Memorial Day crowd at the cemetery was the largest ever and recognized
the Cemetery Board for their efforts in organizing the event.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
Packet Page 18 of 244
AM-2307 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposit and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services
Submitted For:Kathleen Junglov Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #111791 through #111955 for $742,449.26 dated May 21, 2009, and
claim checks #111956 through #112045 for $519,546.57 dated May 28, 2009. Approval of
payroll direct deposit and checks #48084 through #48120 for the pay period May 1, 2009 through
May 15, 2009 in the amount of $834,166.40.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:$2,096,162.23
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $1,261,995.83
Payroll: $ 834,166.40
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 5-21-09
Link: Claim cks 5-28-09
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 05/28/2009 01:21 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:30 PM APRV
Packet Page 19 of 244
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 01:32 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:36 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 05/28/2009 12:02
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 20 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111791 5/21/2009 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 268838 1-13992
PEST CONTROL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 63.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 6.01
Total :69.26
111792 5/21/2009 072732 ADVANTAGE CHEMICAL CORP 12374 Polyester Patch
Polyester Patch
111.000.653.542.610.230.00 1,196.00
Freight
111.000.653.542.610.230.00 100.16
Total :1,296.16
111793 5/21/2009 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8722 Monthly Wholesale Water Charges for
Monthly Wholesale Water Charges for
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 96,998.46
Total :96,998.46
111794 5/21/2009 001528 AM TEST INC 53540 SAMPLE TESTING
SAMPLE TESTING
411.000.656.538.800.410.31 50.00
Total :50.00
111795 5/21/2009 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC OV86 EDMONDS
PRIORITY POLLUTANT TESTING
411.000.656.538.800.410.21 1,720.00
Total :1,720.00
111796 5/21/2009 067442 APPLIED PROFESSIONAL SERV INC 55092 C-311 ODOR PROJECT
C-311 ODOR PROJECT
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 160.00
Total :160.00
111797 5/21/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4276784 UNIFORM SERVICES
1Page:
Packet Page 21 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111797 5/21/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 55.79
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 5.30
Total :61.09
111798 5/21/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4276787 21580001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.51
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.79
Total :101.30
111799 5/21/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4268991 Street/Storm Uniform Svc
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.51
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.51
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.34
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.33
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4276785
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 46.44
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 4.41
2Page:
Packet Page 22 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111799 5/21/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW Mats655-4281339
PW Mats
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
Total :96.87
111800 5/21/2009 064343 AT&T 730386050200 425-744-6057 PUBLIC WORKS
3Page:
Packet Page 23 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111800 5/21/2009 (Continued)064343 AT&T
Public Works Fax Line
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 1.84
Public Works Fax Line
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 7.00
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 7.00
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 7.00
Public Works Fax Line
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 7.00
Public Works Fax Line
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 6.98
Total :36.82
111801 5/21/2009 072686 AUTO ADDITIONS INC 22934 Unit eq54,55,56po - Speakers & mounts
Unit eq54,55,56po - Speakers & mounts
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 913.14
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 86.74
Unit eq54po - Halogens23060
Unit eq54po - Halogens
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 84.90
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 8.07
Total :1,092.85
111802 5/21/2009 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST June 2009 JUNE 2009 AWC PREMIUMS
06/09 Fire Pension AWC Premiums
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 3,824.50
06/09 Retirees AWC Premiums
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 24,109.60
06/09 Gaydos AWC Premiums
001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,188.13
06/09 AWC Premiums
811.000.000.231.510.000.00 316,310.77
4Page:
Packet Page 24 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :345,433.001118025/21/2009 001702 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST
111803 5/21/2009 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0409 Background check services (4
Background check services (4
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 150.00
Total :150.00
111804 5/21/2009 072740 BENNETT, ALEX BENNETT0515 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 200.00
Total :200.00
111805 5/21/2009 065257 BEYETTE, PAM 3 E6MA.2/3 Completion Draw
E6MA.2/3 Completion Draw
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 32,000.00
Total :32,000.00
111806 5/21/2009 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 148 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE
Web Site Maintenance 4/16-5/15/09
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 390.00
Total :390.00
111807 5/21/2009 067519 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 201607 Fiber Patch Cable
Fiber Patch Cable
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 91.72
Freight
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 13.35
Total :105.07
111808 5/21/2009 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 743789 INV#743789 EDMONDS PD - MILLS
511 TDU PANTS
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 79.98
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.710.240.00 7.60
Total :87.58
111809 5/21/2009 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 14103091 C-311 ODOR CONTROL PROJECT
5Page:
Packet Page 25 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111809 5/21/2009 (Continued)066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL
C-311 ODOR CONTROL PROJECT
414.000.656.538.800.410.00 29,675.50
Total :29,675.50
111810 5/21/2009 068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS 9417086866 Asphalt
Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 323.56
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 30.74
Concrete Dump Fees9417093918
Concrete Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 59.40
Asphalt9417100689
Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 323.12
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 30.70
Concrete Dump Fees9417107778
Concrete Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 61.30
Concrete Dumping fees9417114744
Concrete Dumping fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 57.00
Asphalt9417135028
Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 251.56
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 23.90
Asphalt Dumping fees9417135029
Asphalt Dumping fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 69.59
Total :1,230.87
111811 5/21/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 144287 BRUSH KIT
6Page:
Packet Page 26 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111811 5/21/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
BRUSH KIT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.55
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.57
Total :41.12
111812 5/21/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 143935 2955000
WELDING ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 135.81
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.90
2955000LY143986
WELDING RODG
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 -43.80
2954000RN04091114
ARGON/NITROGEN/OXYGEN
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 33.20
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 3.15
Total :141.26
111813 5/21/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY144090 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 57.45
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 7.11
ALS SUPPLIESLY144091
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 67.72
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 8.09
7Page:
Packet Page 27 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :175.371118135/21/2009 003510 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
111814 5/21/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT11107 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11107
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 106.40
Total :106.40
111815 5/21/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460424456 UNIFORMS
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 20.12
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 1.91
OPS UNIFORMS460424457
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 110.08
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.46
UNIFORMS460425502
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 131.85
Stn. 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 131.85
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.53
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.52
UNIFORMS460425520
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.49
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.11
Total :570.92
111816 5/21/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 6980 INV#6980, CUST#45 EDMONDS PD
NEXTEL PHONES-NARCS 04/09
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 56.19
8Page:
Packet Page 28 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111816 5/21/2009 (Continued)019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
INV#6981, CUST#1430 EDMONDS PD6981
VERIZON PHONE 04/09 - NARCS
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 50.24
Total :106.43
111817 5/21/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 6953 Maint./ Operations Costs May 09
Maint./ Operations Costs May 09
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83
Signal Maintenance - thru 4/10/096972
Signal Maintenance - thru 4/10/09
111.000.653.542.640.510.00 424.42
Total :14,225.25
111818 5/21/2009 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 1-218359-279832 2203 N 205 ST
2203 N 205 ST
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 13.34
Total :13.34
111819 5/21/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W2057106 SUPPLIES
HAND SANITIZER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 112.32
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.67
Total :122.99
111820 5/21/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W2060773 OPS SUPPLIES
Stns' supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 133.40
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 12.67
Total :146.07
111821 5/21/2009 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 7015 Domain Name - Registration
9Page:
Packet Page 29 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111821 5/21/2009 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
Domain Name - Registration
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 12.95
Arin - Registration Services Agreement
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 1,250.00
Central Pmts Credits for prior month's7015
Central Pmts Credits for prior month's
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 -230.00
Total :1,032.95
111822 5/21/2009 068815 CORRECT EQUIPMENT 20872 Grinder Pump Repair & Maint Class - ~
Grinder Pump Repair & Maint Class - ~
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 30.00
Total :30.00
111823 5/21/2009 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING APRIL 2009 DRYCLEANING/LAUNDRY 04/09 EDMONDS PD
DRY CLEANING FOR APRIL 2009
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 646.12
Total :646.12
111824 5/21/2009 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0128 OPS UNIFORMS
Training BC
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 19.53
OPS UNIFORMS510-0991
Batt Chiefs & LTs
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 46.54
PREV UNIFORMS510-1524
Fire Marshal
001.000.510.522.300.240.00 12.31
OPS UNIFORMS510-1602
LT B.McA
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 5.89
ADMIN UNIFORMS510-1884
Fire Chief
001.000.510.522.100.240.00 22.03
10Page:
Packet Page 30 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111824 5/21/2009 (Continued)065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING
OPS UNIFORMS510-2341
Asst. Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 16.42
Total :122.72
111825 5/21/2009 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0509 2989771 INV#0509 2989771 5374044 EDMONDS PD
HOT/COLD COOLER RENTAL
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.00
5 GALLON DRINKING H20 BOTTLES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 68.31
ENERGY SURCHARGE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.70
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.95
Total :80.96
111826 5/21/2009 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 229995 INV#229995 - EDMONDS PD
CANTONESE INTERPRET #09-1245
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 105.00
INV#229996 - EDMONDS PD229996
CANTONESE INTERPRET #09-1245
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 52.50
Total :157.50
111827 5/21/2009 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 3154844 Sewer Inventory -24" Manhole & Lids~
Sewer Inventory -24" Manhole & Lids~
411.000.655.535.800.340.00 1,138.60
S-MHCI-25.25-020
411.000.655.535.800.340.00 1,138.60
12" frame and lidd
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 799.50
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.340.00 195.85
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 68.75
11Page:
Packet Page 31 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,341.301118275/21/2009 068803 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS
111828 5/21/2009 071255 ECOLIGHTS NORTHWEST LLC 39768 City Wide - Recycle fluorescent bulbs
City Wide - Recycle fluorescent bulbs
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 148.80
Total :148.80
111829 5/21/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 8726 SUPPLIES
OIL FILTERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.07
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.05
Total :35.12
111830 5/21/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 8337 Sewer - Fuses
Sewer - Fuses
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.94
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.18
Sewer - Fuses8340
Sewer - Fuses
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.93
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.28
Total :5.33
111831 5/21/2009 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS 2009LTAC 2009 ADVERTISING SEASON BROCHURE
2009 ECA Season Brochure Advertising
120.000.310.575.420.440.00 10,000.00
Total :10,000.00
111832 5/21/2009 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 16611 UPS/THERMO ELECTRON CORP.
UPS/THERMO ELECTRON CORP.
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 706.60
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 67.13
12Page:
Packet Page 32 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :773.731118325/21/2009 070683 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL
111833 5/21/2009 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP AGUIRRE0223 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS FOR:~
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 193.00
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPTAWIL0226
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP:~
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 75.00
Total :268.00
111834 5/21/2009 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-01127 WWTP WATER
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 84.93
WWTP WATER6-01130
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 23.75
WWTP WATER6-01140
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 760.43
Total :869.11
111835 5/21/2009 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-POLICE/CRT
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,067.48
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE6-02736
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE LINE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 13.57
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE6-02737
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX-FIRE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 160.33
PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION6-02738
PUBLIC SAFETY IRRIGATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 130.38
LIBRARY & SPRINKLER6-02825
LIBRARY & SPRINKLER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 915.16
13Page:
Packet Page 33 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111835 5/21/2009 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR)6-02875
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (FIRE DETECTOR)
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 23.75
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER6-02925
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,083.56
Fire Station #166-04127
Fire Station #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 444.47
fire sprinkler-FS #166-04128
fire sprinkler-FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 13.57
Public Works Bldg6-05155
Public Works Bldg
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 105.46
Public Works Bldg
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 400.74
Public Works Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 400.74
Public Works Bldg
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 400.74
Public Works Bldg
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 400.74
Public Works Bldg
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 400.73
14Page:
Packet Page 34 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111835 5/21/2009 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Public Works Fire Detector6-05156
Public Works Fire Detector
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 1.70
Public Works Fire Detector
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 6.44
Public Works Fire Detector
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 6.44
Public Works Fire Detector
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 6.44
Public Works Fire Detector
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 6.44
Public Works Fire Detector
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 6.43
Total :5,995.31
111836 5/21/2009 071719 EDNETICS INC 46357 QUOTE # 13403 - CISCO 3560E SWITCH
CISCO Smart Extended Service Agreement310-00119
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 336.00
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 29.90
Total :365.90
111837 5/21/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 044888 Canon 5870 color copy charge 4/7/09 -
Canon 5870 color copy charge 4/7/09 -
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 20.97
Canon 5870 color copy charge 4/7/09 -
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 20.97
Canon 5870 color copy charge 4/7/09 -
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 20.96
Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 1.99
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 1.99
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 2.00
15Page:
Packet Page 35 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :68.881118375/21/2009 008812 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
111838 5/21/2009 072655 ETC INSTITUTE 83555 COMMUNITY SURVEY
POOL SURVEY~
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 3,000.00
Total :3,000.00
111839 5/21/2009 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES 419564 EDMCI
STEEL PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 99.45
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.45
Total :108.90
111840 5/21/2009 067599 EWING ELECTRIC INC M763 CITY PARK POWER LINE REPAIR
CITY PARK EMERGENCY POWER LINE REPAIR
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 2,315.75
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 206.10
Total :2,521.85
111841 5/21/2009 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU16261 Supplies
Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.68
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.25
Unit 477 - SuppliesWAMOU16452
Unit 477 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.67
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.63
Total :10.23
111842 5/21/2009 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0211080 Sewer supplies
16Page:
Packet Page 36 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111842 5/21/2009 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
Sewer supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 81.94
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.18
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 8.47
Hydrant Replacement0212729
Hydrant Replacement
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2,179.11
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 167.79
Total :2,444.49
111843 5/21/2009 072737 FIRE SYSTEMS WEST INC SM131459-214 Library - Sensor system wire
Library - Sensor system wire
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 130.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.35
Total :142.35
111844 5/21/2009 072174 FRIENDS OF FRANK DEMIERO FRIENDS2009 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
123.000.640.573.100.410.00 900.00
Total :900.00
111845 5/21/2009 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 90729313 Concrete
Concrete
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 375.62
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 35.69
Concrete90729314
Concrete
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 318.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 30.21
17Page:
Packet Page 37 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :759.521118455/21/2009 018495 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST
111846 5/21/2009 012199 GRAINGER 9894557033 837944131
AIR HOSE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 66.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.07
Total :72.07
111847 5/21/2009 012199 GRAINGER 9883242241 FAC - 1HP Motor
FAC - 1HP Motor
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 83.51
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.68
Total :91.19
111848 5/21/2009 070437 HARDIE, MARY ANN 5/4/09 Travel reimbursement - WSLEA conference
Travel reimbursement - WSLEA conference
001.000.220.516.210.430.00 174.37
Total :174.37
111849 5/21/2009 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007A5917 036570
PLASTIC SHEETING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,597.73
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,043.69
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 250.94
Total :2,892.36
111850 5/21/2009 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC 105231-H E7AC.Services thru 04/25/09
E7AC.Services thru 04/25/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 6,641.23
Total :6,641.23
111851 5/21/2009 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 1030-127 Testing services 3/16/09 & 4/9/09
18Page:
Packet Page 38 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111851 5/21/2009 (Continued)069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED
Testing services 3/16/09 & 4/9/09
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 85.00
Total :85.00
111852 5/21/2009 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 20224 E9FB.Services thru 05/01/09
E9FB.Services thru 05/01/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 4,563.62
Total :4,563.62
111853 5/21/2009 013350 HIGHLAND, SCOTT E3JC.Pmt 1 E3JC.Services thru 05/01/09
E3JC.Services thru 05/01/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 243.60
E3JC.Services thru 05/08/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 529.20
E3JC.Services thru 05/15/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 806.40
E3JC.Mileage thru 05/15/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 71.34
Total :1,650.54
111854 5/21/2009 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 41 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 30.00
Total :30.00
111855 5/21/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1032023 Fac Maint - Shop Supplies - Tape
Fac Maint - Shop Supplies - Tape
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.94
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.89
Water - truck supplies1084003
Water - truck supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 88.18
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.38
19Page:
Packet Page 39 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111855 5/21/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Sewer - Unit 23 - supplies - 2x4's &2031890
Sewer - Unit 23 - supplies - 2x4's &
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 20.91
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.99
Library - Silcone, PVC, Supplies2284406
Library - Silcone, PVC, Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 71.14
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.76
PS - Bags2590481
PS - Bags
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.86
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.65
MCH - Ceiling repair supplies3082118
MCH - Ceiling repair supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 71.91
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.83
Water - Bark3110425
Water - Bark
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.42
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.18
Library - Supplies40107
Library - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.75
Fac Maint - Truck Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.58
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.12
20Page:
Packet Page 40 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111855 5/21/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Sewer - Truck supplies - Tread Tape40139
Sewer - Truck supplies - Tread Tape
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 59.91
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.69
MCH - MDF Boards4038815
MCH - MDF Boards
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.60
Street - Parts for 3rd & Main Lights4108753
Street - Parts for 3rd & Main Lights
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 38.15
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3.62
MCH - Plastic bags, liq nail, supplies5038496
MCH - Plastic bags, liq nail, supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 44.32
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.98
Sewer - Ratchet supplies5038516
Sewer - Ratchet supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 41.89
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.77
PW - DRV Cleat5595389
PW - DRV Cleat
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.55
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.31
PS - Boiler Vent Cap, Windex6030989
PS - Boiler Vent Cap, Windex
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.93
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.13
21Page:
Packet Page 41 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111855 5/21/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Storm - Hrdw Cloth~6571691
Storm - Hrdw Cloth~
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 8.39
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 0.80
Sewer - Mossroof application6576847
Sewer - Mossroof application
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 18.94
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.70
Sewer - Sprayer6595211
Sewer - Sprayer
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 9.97
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.89
Fac Maint - Unit 5 - Supplies8030428
Fac Maint - Unit 5 - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.88
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.79
Fac Maint - Brushes8573274
Fac Maint - Brushes
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.56
PS - Bug Spray
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.45
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.04
Street - Supplies - Sign Shop9039953
Street - Supplies - Sign Shop
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 69.76
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 6.63
22Page:
Packet Page 42 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111855 5/21/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FAC - Staff T repair supplies9091101
FAC - Staff T repair supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.48
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.09
Sewer - Return - Strap Hinge9252545
Sewer - Return - Strap Hinge
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -23.92
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 -2.15
Library - Repair Supplies9570993
Library - Repair Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.18
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.39
Sewer - Strap Hinge9580178
Sewer - Strap Hinge
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 23.92
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.15
Return SVC FeeOAC-000000017
Return SVC Fee
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -20.00
Total :796.16
111856 5/21/2009 071075 ICC, CERTIFICATION RENEWALS Harrison Harrison ICC 2009 App/Cert Renewal
Harrison ICC 2009 App/Cert Renewal
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 50.00
Total :50.00
111857 5/21/2009 071254 INT'L WATER TREATMENT NA 0214 FAC - Replacement part
23Page:
Packet Page 43 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111857 5/21/2009 (Continued)071254 INT'L WATER TREATMENT NA
FAC - Replacement part
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 365.00
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.58
Total :421.58
111858 5/21/2009 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 010494746 C/A 010494746
4/10-5/10/09 PR1-1 City Phone Service
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 817.39
Total :817.39
111859 5/21/2009 014940 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 110432846 Unit eq55po - Battery
Unit eq55po - Battery
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 142.15
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 12.65
Shop Inventory - Battery110432936
Shop Inventory - Battery
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 69.95
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 6.65
Unit eq40wr - Batteries745738
Unit eq40wr - Batteries
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 33.90
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 3.22
Total :268.52
111860 5/21/2009 069851 JACKYE'S ENTERPRISES INC 7943 Work Shirts - Personalized
24Page:
Packet Page 44 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111860 5/21/2009 (Continued)069851 JACKYE'S ENTERPRISES INC
Work Shirts - Personalized
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 65.00
Work Shirts
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 60.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.17
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.70
Total :136.87
111861 5/21/2009 069526 KEMCO SUPPLY OF WA INC 51526 INV#51526 - EDMONDS PD
MICROTEX LATEX PF GLOVES - XLG
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 59.90
PROTECTION + NITRIL GLOVES -LG
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 59.90
PROTECTION + NITRIL GLOVES - XLG
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 59.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 17.07
INV#51527 - EDMONDS PD51527
MICROTEX, LATEX PF GLOVES - MED
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 59.90
MICROTEX, LATEX PF GLOVES - LG
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 59.90
PROTECTION PLUS, LATEX GLOVES-LG
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 43.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 15.47
Total :375.04
111862 5/21/2009 016211 KESSELRING GUN SHOP 21447 INV#21447 - EDMONDS POLICE
25Page:
Packet Page 45 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111862 5/21/2009 (Continued)016211 KESSELRING GUN SHOP
2/SAF ALS BELT HOLSTERS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 67.50
3/SAF ACC CUFF/MAG CARRIER POUCH
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 112.14
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 17.07
Total :196.71
111863 5/21/2009 066585 KINNEY, DON 5/7/09 OT from sick leave buy back for the
OT from sick leave buy back for the
001.000.410.521.220.110.00 19.46
Total :19.46
111864 5/21/2009 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS E2DB.36 E2DB.Services thru 03/31/09
E2DB.Services thru 03/31/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 3,915.68
Total :3,915.68
111865 5/21/2009 016600 KROESENS INC 95330 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Maples
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 806.40
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 76.61
OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING95331
Mayfield
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 790.40
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 75.09
Total :1,748.50
111866 5/21/2009 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO 80422 FAC - Thermostatic Radiator Control
FAC - Thermostatic Radiator Control
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 238.90
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.70
26Page:
Packet Page 46 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :261.601118665/21/2009 017060 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO
111867 5/21/2009 006048 L N CURTIS & SONS 7010013-00 OPS SUPPLIES
stns' cleaning supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 168.40
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 4.08
Total :172.48
111868 5/21/2009 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 24943 Prof Serv Landau Task Order #09-03 Bldg
Prof Serv Landau Task Order #09-03 Bldg
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 1,229.33
Total :1,229.33
111869 5/21/2009 072734 LANTEC PRODUCTS INC 16143 CE2525
PACKING FOR ODOR SCRUBBER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5,909.50
Total :5,909.50
111870 5/21/2009 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 654628 Replace Portable Generator
Replace Portable Generator
111.000.653.542.710.350.00 799.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.710.350.00 71.11
Total :870.11
111871 5/21/2009 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 5382 E5MC.Services thru 04/30/09
E5MC.Services thru 04/30/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 2,960.00
Total :2,960.00
111872 5/21/2009 019940 MC COMAS, GARY 40 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 190.00
Total :190.00
111873 5/21/2009 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 42 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
27Page:
Packet Page 47 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111873 5/21/2009 (Continued)019920 MCCANN, MARIAN
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.290.00 6,034.50
Total :6,034.50
111874 5/21/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 28158337 `123106800
SEALED-BEAM BULBS
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 307.50
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 9.79
12310680028238860
HOSE COUPLINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 180.92
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.32
12310680028427677
RESPIRATOR MASK/ROPE/STEEL BAR
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 862.34
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 83.35
12310680028453772
ELECTRICAL PLUGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 195.12
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.32
12310680028835519
HOSE COUPLING/AIR HOSE/PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 360.95
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 15.70
12310680028920775
CONNECTOR/ROPE/EYEBOLTS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 216.63
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.79
28Page:
Packet Page 48 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :2,251.731118745/21/2009 020039 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
111875 5/21/2009 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 14681 MICROFILMING
Microfilm Services
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 1,076.95
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 102.31
Total :1,179.26
111876 5/21/2009 063773 MICROFLEX 00018550 Tax Audit Program thru 4/30/09
Tax Audit Program thru 4/30/09
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 111.30
Total :111.30
111877 5/21/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 87200 17967
SCAFFOLDING/CASTER/PIN/JACK
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 10.50
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 1.00
Total :11.50
111878 5/21/2009 067005 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES 94243383 239570
SENSOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1,005.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 11.14
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 96.54
Total :1,112.68
111879 5/21/2009 072569 NAC ARCHITECTURE INC #4 AQUATICS FEASIBILITY STUDY
FEASIBILITY STUDY~
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 3,134.50
Total :3,134.50
111880 5/21/2009 024001 NC MACHINERY CO SECS0489641 Unit 9 - Motor and Core Charge
29Page:
Packet Page 49 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111880 5/21/2009 (Continued)024001 NC MACHINERY CO
Unit 9 - Motor and Core Charge
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 596.66
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 56.68
Total :653.34
111881 5/21/2009 023800 NFPA 4577791X ADMIN MISC
TT mbrshp thru 7/10
001.000.510.522.100.490.00 150.00
Total :150.00
111882 5/21/2009 068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 1022106 Unit eq43wq - 5 Nested Slide Out Trays
Unit eq43wq - 5 Nested Slide Out Trays
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 959.90
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 117.28
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 102.33
Total :1,179.51
111883 5/21/2009 068663 NORTHERN ENERGY PROPANE 114996 Propane
Propane
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 159.36
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 15.14
Total :174.50
111884 5/21/2009 070292 NORTHROP GRUMMAN - IT J032017563M Versaprobe Annual Maint Agreement~
Versaprobe Annual Maint Agreement~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 235.00
Total :235.00
111885 5/21/2009 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 1832 260
30Page:
Packet Page 50 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111885 5/21/2009 (Continued)066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 1,106.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 105.07
Total :1,211.07
111886 5/21/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0941521 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 758.96
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0943128
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 174.47
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0943303
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
Total :1,113.72
111887 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 735801 HR Office Supplies
HR Office Supplies
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 92.84
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 8.82
Total :101.66
111888 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 661971 Hand Sanitizing Lotion
Hand Sanitizing Lotion
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 9.45
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 0.90
Super Glue & Calculator paper rolls812919
Super Glue & Calculator paper rolls
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 53.86
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 5.11
31Page:
Packet Page 51 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :69.321118885/21/2009 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
111889 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 685301 520437
PENS/ADHESIVE/INK CARTRIDGE
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 91.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 8.65
520437706774
LOG BOOK
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 81.21
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 7.72
Total :188.58
111890 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 735380 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 267.59
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 25.42
OFFICE SUPPLIES770362
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 31.66
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 3.00
Total :327.67
111891 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 752586 Water/Sewer - Stapler, Staples
32Page:
Packet Page 52 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111891 5/21/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
Water/Sewer - Stapler, Staples
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.78
Water/Sewer - Stapler, Staples
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 13.78
PW - Large Laminate Sheets for Maps
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 4.66
PW - Large Laminate Sheets for Maps
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 9.33
PW - Large Laminate Sheets for Maps
111.000.653.542.900.310.00 9.33
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.20
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.31
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 0.44
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.310.00 0.89
PW Admin office supplies - Correction825783
PW Admin office supplies - Correction
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 38.25
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 3.63
Total :97.60
111892 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 686046 Chair floor mat for Council Office
Chair floor mat for Council Office
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 69.76
Total :69.76
111893 5/21/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 779143 OPS SUPPLIES
stations' supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 264.15
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 25.10
33Page:
Packet Page 53 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111893 5/21/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
OPS SUPPLIES817167
Binders
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 24.27
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 2.31
Total :315.83
111894 5/21/2009 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 038740 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,899.64
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 180.47
YOST POOL SUPPLIES038812
INJECTOR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 89.85
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.87
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.00
Total :2,183.83
111895 5/21/2009 072539 OTAK INC-WASHINGTON 040985947 E8FA.Services thru 04/03/09
E8FA.Services thru 04/03/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 14,764.15
Total :14,764.15
111896 5/21/2009 069214 OVERHEAD DOOR CO. OF EVERETT 1272 FS 16 - Timer Board Installed
FS 16 - Timer Board Installed
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 396.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 37.62
Total :433.62
111897 5/21/2009 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00052796 Unit 55 - WLDT-Door Hinge
34Page:
Packet Page 54 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111897 5/21/2009 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Unit 55 - WLDT-Door Hinge
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 95.03
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.60
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.32
Total :118.95
111898 5/21/2009 065787 PATRIOT DIAMOND INC 93393 2 - 14" Concrete Blades
2 - 14" Concrete Blades
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 336.00
Freight
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 16.00
Total :352.00
111899 5/21/2009 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 27096.000-16 E7CB.Services thru 03/29/09
E7CB.Services thru 03/29/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 2,381.25
E7CB.Services thru 04/26/0927096.000-17
E7CB.Services thru 04/26/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 2,793.75
Total :5,175.00
111900 5/21/2009 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC Pool 2009 Yost Pool Start Up Funds for 2009
Yost Pool Start Up Funds for 2009
001.000.000.111.700.000.00 225.00
Total :225.00
111901 5/21/2009 062296 PETTY CASH - WWTP 5/18/2009 FAUCET/COFFEE MAKER
35Page:
Packet Page 55 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111901 5/21/2009 (Continued)062296 PETTY CASH - WWTP
FAUCET/COFFEE MAKER
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 27.85
ICE FOR LAB/FOIL FOR LAB
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 18.71
COPIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 50.69
OIL FOR MAINT.
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 49.53
ADDRESS LABELS/COFFEE CUPS
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 44.08
TRAVEL/KOHO/OLIVER/SEBERS
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 54.00
MTG. REFRESHMENTS
411.000.656.538.800.310.00 9.50
BLACKBERRY CASE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 32.84
Total :287.20
111902 5/21/2009 067159 PIERCE COUNTY BUDGET &C3322 TRAINING MISC
Bailey trench rescue
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 650.00
Total :650.00
111903 5/21/2009 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100MY09 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
Lease from 4/30 to 5/30
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 866.00
Total :866.00
111904 5/21/2009 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 176351 PW- Safety Video return postage
36Page:
Packet Page 56 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111904 5/21/2009 (Continued)071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
PW- Safety Video return postage
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 1.72
PW- Safety Video return postage
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 1.72
PW- Safety Video return postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.72
PW- Safety Video return postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 3.46
Street - Shipping for Controll Monitor176464
Street - Shipping for Controll Monitor
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 45.77
PW - Safety Video return postage176476
PW - Safety Video return postage
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 1.72
PW - Safety Video return postage
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 1.72
PW - Safety Video return postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 1.72
PW - Safety Video return postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 3.46
Total :63.01
111905 5/21/2009 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 TELEMETRY
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52
Total :138.52
111906 5/21/2009 071696 RANKINS, KATE RANKINS0517 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 210.00
Total :210.00
111907 5/21/2009 072736 RECONNECTIONS 1221 3 - 18" Cord Neckloops
37Page:
Packet Page 57 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111907 5/21/2009 (Continued)072736 RECONNECTIONS
3 - 18" Cord Neckloops
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 124.95
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.87
Total :145.82
111908 5/21/2009 072735 RICE GROUP INC 19758 Architectural Design Services
Architectural Design Services
116.000.651.519.920.410.00 6,655.91
Mechanical Eng Svc19807
Mechanical Eng Svc
116.000.651.519.920.410.00 500.00
Total :7,155.91
111909 5/21/2009 071993 RYAN, SANDY RYAN0515 REFUND
REFUND OF CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 155.00
Total :155.00
111910 5/21/2009 067003 SCHOETTLE, GEORGE 050509 CPR Class - Fac Maint (4)
38Page:
Packet Page 58 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111910 5/21/2009 (Continued)067003 SCHOETTLE, GEORGE
CPR Class - Fac Maint (4)
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 120.00
Storm (7)
411.000.652.542.400.490.00 210.00
Street (8)
111.000.653.542.310.490.00 240.00
Fleet (3)
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 90.00
Parks (10)
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 300.00
Sewer (9)
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 180.00
Water (11)
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 330.00
Total :1,470.00
111911 5/21/2009 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC 61404960 31000560
FLANGE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 347.80
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 25.51
Total :373.31
111912 5/21/2009 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 134199 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Facepiece bracket
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 151.68
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 7.99
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 15.17
Total :174.84
111913 5/21/2009 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 03-983421 Unit 36 - End Kit, Hose, Belts
39Page:
Packet Page 59 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111913 5/21/2009 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
Unit 36 - End Kit, Hose, Belts
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 113.03
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.74
Unit 251- Filter03-984252
Unit 251- Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.99
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.76
Unit 336 - Brake pad03-984881
Unit 336 - Brake pad
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.88
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.93
Unit 88 - Resistor, Gas filter03-985644
Unit 88 - Resistor, Gas filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.77
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.26
Returns and Core Fees05-303025
Returns and Core Feesg
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -84.87
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -8.06
Total :122.43
111914 5/21/2009 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 253564 Unit 96 - Handle
Unit 96 - Handle
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.58
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.57
40Page:
Packet Page 60 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111914 5/21/2009 (Continued)061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET
Returns - HandleCM253179
Returns - Handleg
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -25.74
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -2.45
Total :12.96
111915 5/21/2009 063444 SHARP SHOP INC 294517 Water Quickcut Saw Complete Tuneup
Water Quickcut Saw Complete Tuneup
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 204.95
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 18.44
Saw Service, Repair, and shipping294744
Saw Service, Repair, and shipping
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 269.25
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 24.23
Total :516.87
111916 5/21/2009 065119 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB 0513332-IN #O513332-IN - EDMONDS PD
DFO SPRAY
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 194.75
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.38
Total :211.13
111917 5/21/2009 071725 SKAGIT GARDENS INC 52151017 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
PLANTS FOR CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 589.54
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 56.01
41Page:
Packet Page 61 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111917 5/21/2009 (Continued)071725 SKAGIT GARDENS INC
CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION52151018
PLANTS FOR CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 106.92
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.16
Total :762.63
111918 5/21/2009 036955 SKY NURSERY 277437 MILLTOWN COURTYARD
SUPPLIES FOR MILLTOWN COURTYARD
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 107.88
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.25
MILLTOWN COURTYARD277440
MILLTOWN COURTYARD SUPPLIES
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 134.85
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.81
MILLTOWN COURTYARD278145
SUPPLIES FOR MILLTOWN COURTYARD
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 134.85
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.81
MILLTOWN COURTYARD278152
MILLTOWN COURTYARD
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 134.85
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.81
Total :561.11
111919 5/21/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2450016544 UTILITY BILLING
18500 82ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 66.72
UTILITY BILLING3570014369
8030 185TH ST SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 148.52
42Page:
Packet Page 62 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111919 5/21/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014245
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.70
Total :244.94
111920 5/21/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 640029810 620-001-500-3
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.43
Total :7.43
111921 5/21/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2410016253 LIFT STATION #2
LIFT STATION #2
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 58.97
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR2880027277
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 28.25
SIGNAL LIGHT3350014902
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 41.97
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3970013581
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.19
Total :157.38
111922 5/21/2009 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2009054 INV#2009054 EDMONDS PD
64.67 BOOKINGS FOR 04/09
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,998.79
534.58 JAIL HOUSING DAYS F0R 04/09
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 32,668.18
Total :38,666.97
111923 5/21/2009 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2343478-01 Bib Overalls - 1 - M Brown
43Page:
Packet Page 63 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111923 5/21/2009 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
Bib Overalls - 1 - M Brown
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 80.00
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 7.36
Total :87.36
111924 5/21/2009 070677 SPRINT 502779811-017 INV#502779811-017 EDMONDS PD
DATA CARDS 05/07 - 06/06/09
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 169.97
Total :169.97
111925 5/21/2009 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L77077 APR-09 AUDIT FEES
April 09 Audit Fees
001.000.390.519.900.510.00 7,509.96
April 09 Audit Fees
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 312.92
April 09 Audit Fees
411.000.654.534.800.510.00 1,251.66
April 09 Audit Fees
411.000.655.535.800.510.00 1,251.66
April 09 Audit Fees
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 1,251.66
April 09 Audit Fees
111.000.653.543.300.510.00 312.92
April 09 Audit Fees
511.000.657.548.680.510.00 625.82
Total :12,516.60
111926 5/21/2009 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2817099 Throttle lever, handle grips
Throttle lever, handle grips
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 115.58
Freight
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 8.50
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 11.79
44Page:
Packet Page 64 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :135.871119265/21/2009 009400 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC
111927 5/21/2009 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3000460169 INV#3000460169, CUST#6076358 EDMONDS PD
MINIMUM MONTHLY SERVICE CHG
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 10.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 0.36
Total :10.36
111928 5/21/2009 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1846000 Returns
Returns
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -106.28
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -10.10
Elect supplies1847314
Elect supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 198.15
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.82
Total :100.59
111929 5/21/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18868686 100323
SECURITY QUICK LINK
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.35
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.79
10032318868935
GLOVES/CAP SCREW
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 23.37
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.22
10032318868963
HEX NUT/STUDS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 16.62
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.58
45Page:
Packet Page 65 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :52.931119295/21/2009 040917 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
111930 5/21/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10809931 Shop Supplies - Hex Screws, Flat
Shop Supplies - Hex Screws, Flat
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 341.19
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 32.41
Shop Supplies10812239
Shop Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 26.23
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 2.49
Total :402.32
111931 5/21/2009 070866 TEST SUPPLY INC 28293 TRANSMITING DEVICE
TRANSMITING DEVICE
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1,153.80
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 12.00
Total :1,165.80
111932 5/21/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 2009-6990 2009 SUMMER CAMP AD-May Issue
2009 SUMMER CAMP AD-May Issue
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 125.00
Total :125.00
111933 5/21/2009 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 112400 FAC
monthly elevator maint-FAC~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 807.09
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 76.67
Total :883.76
111934 5/21/2009 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES 4/30/09 MEBT Account services 4/09
MEBT Account services 4/09
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 84.57
46Page:
Packet Page 66 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :84.571119345/21/2009 068249 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES
111935 5/21/2009 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8170014 Water Inventory ~
Water Inventory ~
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 1,260.00
W-VALVCI-02-010
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 672.48
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 183.58
Water Supplies - CC Romac Saddle8176069
Water Supplies - CC Romac Saddle
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 446.32
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 42.40
Total :2,604.78
111936 5/21/2009 043935 UPS 00002T4T13199 Bal Outstanding from Shipment to
Bal Outstanding from Shipment to
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 1.26
Total :1.26
111937 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3181 #3181 - 05/06/09 BARD-EDMONDS PD
KEYS FOR INCIDENT VEHICLE
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 14.78
BADGE ENGRAVING
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.86
SNACK/STREET CRIME CLASS 4/27/09
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 10.98
USB CABLE FOR PRINTER INSTALL
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 25.38
SNACK/STREET CRIME CLASS 4/28/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.98
SNACK/STREET CRIME CLASS 4/29/09
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 7.98
REG. AMER.HUMANE ASSN-SHOEMAKE
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 220.00
47Page:
Packet Page 67 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111937 5/21/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
#3314 05/06/09 LAWLESS - EDMONDS3314
DARE AWARD LUNCHEON 05/04/09
001.000.410.521.310.310.00 32.49
#3512 05/06/09 - TRAINING - EDMONDS PD3512
MEAL/WSPCA MCCLURE 04/07/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 16.75
FUEL/WSPCA MCCLURE 04/26/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 19.80
MEAL/WSPCA MCCLURE 04/27/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.03
MEAL/WSPCA MCCLURE/HAWLEY 4/28
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 40.05
LODGING/WSPCA MCCLURE 04/28
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 371.16
#3520 05/06/09 - TRAINING - EDMONDS PD3520
DUST OFF
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 20.10
BATTERIES/PAPER PRODUCTS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 127.51
CD-R RECORDABLE DISCS-10 PKS
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 296.75
MEAL/WSPCA HAWLEY 4/27/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 9.56
MEAL/WSPCA HAWLEY/MCCLURE 4/27
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 63.01
MEAL/WSPCA HAWLEY 4/29/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 7.31
FUEL/WSPCA HAWLEY 4/29/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 20.00
LODGING/WSPCA HAWLEY 4/29/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 371.16
Total :1,705.64
111938 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3207 Video Capture Card (Community Services)
48Page:
Packet Page 68 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111938 5/21/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Video Capture Card (Community Services)
001.000.390.519.900.350.00 408.99
Amtrack tickets (travel) for Stephen
001.000.240.513.110.430.00 54.00
Aquatic Leads (#09-20), Aquatic3280
Aquatic Leads (#09-20), Aquatic
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 75.00
Total :537.99
111939 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3538 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS
REFERENCE BOOK
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 7.48
TRAINING DVD FOR POOL
001.000.640.575.510.490.00 45.00
DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES -~
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 16.97
INVITATIONS & NOTE CARDS
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 30.12
EVENT TICKETS
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 21.89
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 125.00
FRONT DESK CALENDARS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 53.68
DISCOVERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 41.99
Total :342.13
111940 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 2462 Epocrates
Epocrates
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 65.70
49Page:
Packet Page 69 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111940 5/21/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
HP - 160gb hot-plug3470
HP - 160gb hot-plug
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 131.94
Shafcom - Headsets for PD
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 1,199.95
Total :1,397.59
111941 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3306 WASTEWATER COLLECTION BOOK/SLENKER
WASTEWATER COLLECTION BOOK/SLENKER
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 99.00
Total :99.00
111942 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3462 CREDIT CARD CHARGES
Recording documents
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 404.00
Finance recording documents
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 944.00
Finance recording documents
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 944.00
Total :2,292.00
111943 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3405 Guardian Security - Old PW Security
Guardian Security - Old PW Security
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 55.00
Micontrols - MCH - Thermostat
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 156.83
50Page:
Packet Page 70 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111943 5/21/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Credit from USPS3546
Credit from USPS
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 -6.33
USPS - Auto Additions return postage3546
USPS - Auto Additions return postage
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.80
USPS - PW Postage Stamps
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 15.12
USPS - Whelen return postage
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.80
USPS - Black Box return postage
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.80
USPS - NC Machinery return postage
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 13.23
Total :248.25
111944 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3389 DVD and Covers for Videotaping Council
DVD and Covers for Videotaping Council
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 117.13
Refreshments for Council Meetings
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 9.09
Total :126.22
111945 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3199 Reg Fee Chave WA ST Energy Summit May
Reg Fee Chave WA ST Energy Summit May
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 75.00
Reg Fee Chave World Affairs Council
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 15.00
Book for Chave - Planning
001.000.620.558.600.310.00 218.01
Total :308.01
111946 5/21/2009 062693 US BANK 3173 ALLISON
OPS supplies/refreshmts
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 37.59
51Page:
Packet Page 71 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
52
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111946 5/21/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
CORREIRA3223
OPS supplies/refreshmts
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 23.97
DAHL3231
Batteries
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 87.57
OPS SUPPLIES3488
log books
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 105.72
TRAINING TRAVEL3504
Bailey trench rescue
001.000.510.522.400.430.00 18.12
Total :272.97
111947 5/21/2009 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE 00224 REPLENISH BULK MAIL PERMIT
Permit 1036 Bulk Mail Permit250-00224
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 1,000.00
Total :1,000.00
111948 5/21/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 53.37
YOST POOL425-775-2645
YOST POOL
001.000.640.575.510.420.00 55.07
Total :108.44
111949 5/21/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-2844 POLICE T1 LINE
Police T1 Line 5/10-6/10/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 377.24
Total :377.24
111950 5/21/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0423 03 0260 1032797592 07
AFTER HOURS PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 56.18
52Page:
Packet Page 72 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
53
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :56.181119505/21/2009 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
111951 5/21/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-7147 LIBRARY SCAN ALARM
LIBRARY SCAN ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 20.01
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE425-672-7132
FLEET MAINTENANCE FAX LINE
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 93.85
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS425-775-1534
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 161.49
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 299.92
Radio Line between Public Works & UB425-775-7865
Radio Line between Public Works & UB
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 52.65
PUBLIC WORKS CPNNECTION TO 911425-RT0-9133
Public Works Connection to 911
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 5.48
Public Works Connection to 911
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 20.81
Public Works Connection to 911
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 20.78
Total :737.42
111952 5/21/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-774-0944 FS #20-FAX LINE
FS #20-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 51.22
Total :51.22
53Page:
Packet Page 73 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
54
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111953 5/21/2009 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2009-1700 INV2009-1700 SURVIVAL SPANISH - YAMANE
SURVIVAL SPANISH - YAMANE 4/22-24
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 75.00
INV2009-1709 HANDGUN INSTRUCTOR COURSE2009-1709
LAVELY - HANDGUN INST. 4/6-17
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 750.00
LEE - HANDGUN INST. 4/6-17
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 750.00
LIM - HANDGUN INST. 4/6-4/17
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 750.00
Total :2,325.00
111954 5/21/2009 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0900393 TRAINING MISC
SA,TC,LJ,AY
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00
TRAININGF0900399
BM, KM, AR tuition
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 11,880.00
housing & food
001.000.510.522.400.430.00 5,865.00
Total :18,145.00
111955 5/21/2009 072195 WESTERN GRAPHICS INC 8030 Unit eq54,55,56po - 3 sets Police Car
Unit eq54,55,56po - 3 sets Police Car
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 983.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 93.39
Total :1,076.39
Bank total :742,449.26165 Vouchers for bank code :front
742,449.26Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report165
54Page:
Packet Page 74 of 244
05/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
55
1:43:44PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
55Page:
Packet Page 75 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111956 5/28/2009 069798 A.M. LEONARD INC C10958770 HARNESS
HARNESS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 93.99
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 48.15
Total :142.14
111957 5/28/2009 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 40347095 Unit 474 - Pneumatic Cylinders
Unit 474 - Pneumatic Cylinders
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 133.75
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.61
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.57
Total :167.93
111958 5/28/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4289110 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23
Total :37.27
111959 5/28/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4281340 Street/Storm Uniform Svc
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.51
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.51
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.34
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.33
1Page:
Packet Page 76 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111959 5/28/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4281341
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4289111
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 41.44
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.94
Total :69.50
111960 5/28/2009 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 589282 Fleet - Premium - 7500 Gal
Fleet - Premium - 7500 Gal
511.000.657.548.680.340.12 14,136.75
ST EXCISE TAX GAS, WA OIL SPILL
511.000.657.548.680.340.12 2,939.25
Diesel - 2200 Gal
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 3,677.52
ST EXCISE TAX DIESEL, WA OIL SPILL
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 859.98
WA ST SVC FEES
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 40.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 3.80
Total :21,657.30
111961 5/28/2009 064343 AT&T 425-771-0152 STATION #16 FAX
STATION #16 FAX
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 35.62
Total :35.62
111962 5/28/2009 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 50406 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
2Page:
Packet Page 77 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111962 5/28/2009 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 36.94
UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 36.94
UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 37.04
UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 115.06
UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 115.06
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.51
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.51
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.52
Total :351.58
111963 5/28/2009 069297 BANK OF AMERICA 0910130330 CUSTOMER # 16-657082
3Page:
Packet Page 78 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111963 5/28/2009 (Continued)069297 BANK OF AMERICA
Phone System Principal Pmt #26
001.000.390.591.730.790.00 10,851.10
Phone System Principal Pmt #26
411.000.652.582.391.790.00 1,020.00
Phone System Principal Pmt #26
411.000.654.582.391.790.00 2,502.99
Phone System Principal Pmt #26
411.000.655.582.391.790.00 1,511.92
Phone System Principal Pmt #26
411.000.656.582.391.790.00 2,199.15
Phone System Interest Pmt #26
001.000.390.592.730.830.00 801.31
Phone System Interest Pmt #26
411.000.652.592.391.830.00 75.32
Phone System Interest Pmt #26
411.000.654.592.391.830.00 184.84
Phone System Interest Pmt #26
411.000.655.592.391.830.00 111.65
Phone System Interest Pmt #26
411.000.656.592.391.830.00 162.39
Total :19,420.67
111964 5/28/2009 072581 BARK TIME BLOWER TRUCK SERVICE 9882 YARD WASTE DISPOSAL
YARD WASTE DISPOSAL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 151.60
YARD WASTE DISPOSAL9883
YARD WASTE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 170.55
YARD WASTE DISPOSAL9884
YARD WASTE DISPOSAL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 151.60
YARD WASTE DISPOSAL9887
YARD WASTE DISPOSAL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 151.60
4Page:
Packet Page 79 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :625.351119645/28/2009 072581 072581 BARK TIME BLOWER TRUCK SERVICE
111965 5/28/2009 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 745606 INV#745606 EDMONDS PD - CIMINO
NAME TAGS - CIMINO
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 18.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 1.71
INV#747480 EDMONDS PD - BARKER747480
SGT CHEVRON
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 2.50
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.55
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.67
Total :27.43
111966 5/28/2009 002525 BOARD OF VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 510-1888 VOLUNTEER BENEFITS
Gustafson pension pymts
001.000.510.522.410.230.00 378.00
VOLUNTEERS BENEFITS510-2602
Assaker 09 pension & 07 disability
001.000.510.522.410.230.00 94.10
VOLUNTEER BENEFITS510-2603
Carrver 09 pension & 07 disability
001.000.510.522.410.230.00 94.10
Total :566.20
111967 5/28/2009 072738 CASCADIA INTERNATIONAL LLC 251642 T Unit eq51so - New 2009 International
Unit eq51so - New 2009 International
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 98,573.13
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 9,463.02
Total :108,036.15
111968 5/28/2009 068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS 9417159322 Dirt Dumped
5Page:
Packet Page 80 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111968 5/28/2009 (Continued)068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS
Dirt Dumped
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 485.66
Total :485.66
111969 5/28/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY144092 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 22.98
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.84
Total :44.32
111970 5/28/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460429511 VOLUNTEERS
Uniforms
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 20.12
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 1.91
OPS UNIFORMS460429512
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 110.08
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.46
UNIFORMS460430547
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 131.85
Stn. 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 131.85
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.53
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.52
Total :431.32
111971 5/28/2009 071389 COASTAL WEAR PRODUCTS INC 908 Unit 138 - Tube Broom
6Page:
Packet Page 81 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111971 5/28/2009 (Continued)071389 COASTAL WEAR PRODUCTS INC
Unit 138 - Tube Broom
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 401.20
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 35.71
Total :436.91
111972 5/28/2009 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC 12666 Unit 132 - Exterior Repairs
Unit 132 - Exterior Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 1,597.10
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 151.73
Total :1,748.83
111973 5/28/2009 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM10989 IRISH DANCE CLASSES
IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 58.80
IRISH DANCE 13+~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 283.50
IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 117.60
Total :459.90
111974 5/28/2009 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING Monthly STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOL
State Share of Concealed Pistol
001.000.000.237.190.000.00 585.00
Total :585.00
111975 5/28/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-2991 MINUTE TAKING
5/19 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 282.00
Total :282.00
111976 5/28/2009 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 229849 INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 69.40
7Page:
Packet Page 82 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :69.401119765/28/2009 060933 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER
111977 5/28/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 8959 SUPPLIES
SPARK PLUGS
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 9.00
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 0.86
Total :9.86
111978 5/28/2009 008410 EDMONDS PRINTING CO R22148 Water Meter Cards (2000)
Water Meter Cards (2000)
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 179.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 17.01
Total :196.01
111979 5/28/2009 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-38565 WATER
18410 92ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 22.06
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK6-00025
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 221.16
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM6-00200
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 264.84
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 171.61
MINI PARK6-00475
MINI PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 655.91
CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 139.84
8Page:
Packet Page 83 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111979 5/28/2009 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 674.41
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 143.72
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER6-02730
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 126.60
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)6-02900
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 128.49
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 240.77
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 83.04
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 150.65
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 134.17
WATER6-04425
8100 185TH PL SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 265.51
SIERRA PARK6-04450
SIERRA PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 183.60
BALLINGER PARK6-07775
BALLINGER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 161.69
9Page:
Packet Page 84 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111979 5/28/2009 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 603.12
YOST PARK POOL6-08525
YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 138.41
Total :4,509.60
111980 5/28/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 044880 MAINT FOR COPIER
MAINT FOR COPIER
001.000.230.512.500.480.00 37.70
Total :37.70
111981 5/28/2009 009880 FEDEX 9-201-77550 MAILING HUD GRANT APPLICATION
Mailing Hud grant application
001.000.610.519.700.420.00 23.25
Total :23.25
111982 5/28/2009 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 245145 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT
June-09 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent
001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00
Total :300.00
111983 5/28/2009 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 089762 Unit 099 - Tires
Unit 099 - Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 105.88
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.06
Unit 099 - Tires089763
Unit 099 - Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 105.88
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.06
Total :231.88
111984 5/28/2009 012199 GRAINGER 9898494720 Water - Work gloves
10Page:
Packet Page 85 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111984 5/28/2009 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER
Water - Work gloves
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 45.12
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.28
Water - White Disposable Wiper9898494738
Water - White Disposable Wiper
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 18.16
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.72
Total :69.28
111985 5/28/2009 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 2126-128 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
T.Smith
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 115.00
DE,AR,BM,KM,JD
001.000.510.522.200.410.00 2,911.00
Total :3,026.00
111986 5/28/2009 069164 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 45962165 Intel Quad Core Processor Option Kit
Intel Quad Core Processor Option Kit
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 3,704.00
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 351.88
HP 8GB Low Power Memory Kit46005008
HP 8GB Low Power Memory Kit
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1,160.00
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 110.20
Total :5,326.08
111987 5/28/2009 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 43 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 292.00
Total :292.00
11Page:
Packet Page 86 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111988 5/28/2009 072466 HOME STREET BANK E5MC.Ret8 Premium Const Retainage 8
Premium Const Retainage 8
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 10,094.31
Total :10,094.31
111989 5/28/2009 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 429170-1 Shop Tools - Step Drill, Supplies
Shop Tools - Step Drill, Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 117.19
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 7.20
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 11.82
Total :136.21
111990 5/28/2009 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 440009908886 ACCT # 430001405909
May & June-09 P&R Directory Listing
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 250.50
Total :250.50
111991 5/28/2009 072528 INTERCOM LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 09-211 INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 146.75
Total :146.75
111992 5/28/2009 072274 JOHNSON, GIGI GJOHNSON0511 LITTLE TYKES TENNIS COACH
LITTLE TIKES TENNIS COACH~
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 30.00
Total :30.00
111993 5/28/2009 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 3311334 INV#3311334 EDMONDS PD
12Page:
Packet Page 87 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111993 5/28/2009 (Continued)072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE
PURELL HAND SANITIZER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 32.70
HAND LOTION
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.90
HANDLING FEE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.47
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.24
Total :60.31
111994 5/28/2009 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 041309-01 INV#041309-01 EDMONDS PD
29 CAR WASHES @5.00 04/09
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 145.00
25 CAR WASHES @5.03 04/09
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 125.75
Total :270.75
111995 5/28/2009 006048 L N CURTIS & SONS 2067417-00 Unit EQ43WQ - Large Folding Step
Unit EQ43WQ - Large Folding Step
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 175.05
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 13.01
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 17.86
Total :205.92
111996 5/28/2009 006048 L N CURTIS & SONS 2067176-00 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Robinson
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 1,792.88
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 16.21
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 171.86
13Page:
Packet Page 88 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111996 5/28/2009 (Continued)006048 L N CURTIS & SONS
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING2067215-00
Mayfield & Maples
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 3,585.76
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 30.51
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 343.55
OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING2067865-00
Carbon hoods
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 495.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 47.03
Total :6,482.80
111997 5/28/2009 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 11005 GLOVES
NITRILE GLOVES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 474.00
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.94
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 45.69
MOWER SUPPLIES5009-368
CEMETERY MOWER SUPPLIES
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 97.28
Freight
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 16.18
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 10.78
SUPPLIES5009-536
ENGINE OIL, LINE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 163.06
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.02
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.30
14Page:
Packet Page 89 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
111997 5/28/2009 (Continued)068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY
GLOVES5009-632
NITRILE GLOVES, TAP HEAD
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 139.88
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.29
Total :1,003.42
111998 5/28/2009 061814 LEYDA, SHERRIE 043009 TRAVEL REFUND
TRAVEL REFUND
001.000.230.512.501.430.00 111.72
Total :111.72
111999 5/28/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 100820 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 321.93
SUPPLIES100856
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 206.96
SUPPLIES101209
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 204.16
Total :733.05
112000 5/28/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 101086 OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARKS & REC ENVELOPES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 89.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 8.46
Total :97.46
112001 5/28/2009 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 269 INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
15Page:
Packet Page 90 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112001 5/28/2009 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA
INTERPRETER FEES270
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES488
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES489
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES496
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES497
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES499
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES501
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES571
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES584
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
Total :882.50
112002 5/28/2009 072223 MILLER, DOUG MILLER0429 GYM MONITOR
GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 LEAGUE~
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 102.00
Total :102.00
112003 5/28/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 88088 Water - Supplies
16Page:
Packet Page 91 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112003 5/28/2009 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
Water - Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 39.85
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.79
Total :43.64
112004 5/28/2009 070788 NETRIVER INC 161 BIRDFEST DOMAIN FEES
Domain for pugetsoundbirdfest.org
120.000.310.575.420.410.00 6.00
BIRDFEST WEB HOSTING FOR QUARTER394
Birdfest web hosting fees for 2nd
120.000.310.575.420.410.00 29.85
Total :35.85
112005 5/28/2009 072741 NEWTON KIGHT LLP 54708 ACCT # 20027-0001M
Jan 09 Legal Fees - Fiber Optic Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 990.00
ACCT # 20027-0001M55073
Feb-09 Legal Fees - Fiber Optic Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 76.61
ACCT # 20027-0001M55465
Legal Fees - Fiber Optic Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 460.78
C/A 20027-0001M56075
Legal Services April-09 Fiber Optic
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 1,800.00
Total :3,327.39
112006 5/28/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0944088 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
Total :180.29
112007 5/28/2009 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 635 Planning Board Minute taker 5/13/09
17Page:
Packet Page 92 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112007 5/28/2009 (Continued)025690 NOYES, KARIN
Planning Board Minute taker 5/13/09
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 176.00
Total :176.00
112008 5/28/2009 072743 O'CONNOR, BERNADETTE 2-11200 Utility Refund 9120 Park Rd
Utility Refund 9120 Park Rd
411.000.000.257.000.000.00 30.00
Total :30.00
112009 5/28/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 429681 INV#429681, ACCT#520437 250POL
HON EXECUTIVE HIGH BACK CHAIR
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 241.45
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 22.93
INV#832244, ACCT#520437 250 POL832244
STAPLERS
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 52.48
CLEAR INDEX DIVIDERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 42.10
RED FELT PENS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.55
BLUE FELT PENS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.55
FLEXGRP RETRACTIBLE PENS, BK
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 21.92
HIGHLIGHTER, YELLOW
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 12.68
LEGAL FOLDERS, 1/3 YELLOW
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 58.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 4.99
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.83
Total :504.38
18Page:
Packet Page 93 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112010 5/28/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 156081 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 -157.96
SUPPLIES175528
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 -110.92
SUPPLIES316962
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 -66.91
SUPPLIES577956
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 52.04
SUPPLIES683321
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 678.75
Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 64.48
SUPPLIES786392
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 32.19
SUPPLIES786730
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 4.70
Total :496.37
112011 5/28/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 807353 OFFICE SUPPLIES
LABELS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 55.56
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 5.28
OFFICE SUPPLIES832650
LAMINATING POUCHES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 61.98
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 5.89
19Page:
Packet Page 94 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112011 5/28/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES906959
CARTRIDGE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 134.78
Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 12.80
Total :276.29
112012 5/28/2009 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER APRIL 09 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,533.57
PSEA 1, 2,3 Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 33,306.49
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 85.50
State Patrol Death Investigations
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 672.15
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 5,315.61
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 275.09
AUTO THEFT PREV
001.000.000.237.250.000.00 2,972.82
truam brain inj
001.000.000.237.260.000.00 745.90
Total :44,907.13
112013 5/28/2009 072720 OFFIS COMMUNICAATIONS 13437 VIDEOCONFERENCING SYSTEM FOR COURT
Q# 033009A 4/28/09 Videoconferencing310-00123
001.000.230.512.500.350.00 7,685.20
Freight310-00123
001.000.230.512.500.350.00 150.00
Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.350.00 744.34
Total :8,579.54
20Page:
Packet Page 95 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112014 5/28/2009 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.831672 PAINT
BASE PAINT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.16
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.25
Total :14.41
112015 5/28/2009 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK10825 PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT
PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT~
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 390.60
PRENATAL GENTLE PILATES
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 169.40
PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT~
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 169.87
Total :729.87
112016 5/28/2009 066381 PERRINVILLE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 283634 INV#283634 EDMONDS PD
BASIC AID TO KITTEN HIT BY CAR
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 178.00
Total :178.00
112017 5/28/2009 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 04371 UNIT F1 B1 FUEL
Fire Boat - Fuel
511.000.657.548.680.320.00 75.11
Total :75.11
112018 5/28/2009 065105 PORT SUPPLY 7194 Unit 474 - Fasteners
Unit 474 - Fasteners
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.60
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.14
Total :1.74
112019 5/28/2009 072444 PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION GROUP E5MC.Pmt 8 E5MC.Prog Pmt 8 thru 05/15/09
E5MC.Prog Pmt 8 thru 05/15/09
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 210,464.10
21Page:
Packet Page 96 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :210,464.101120195/28/2009 072444 072444 PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION GROUP
112020 5/28/2009 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 09-219 COURT SECURITY
COURT SECURITY
001.000.230.512.500.410.00 3,240.63
Total :3,240.63
112021 5/28/2009 072630 RADIA 0394141RMI 6-13-09 INV #0394141RMI 6-13-09 EDMONDS PD
SERVICE @ STEVENS - EDMONDS PRISONER
001.000.410.523.600.310.00 34.10
Total :34.10
112022 5/28/2009 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 001020 Street Sweeping Dump Fees
Street Sweeping Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 432.83
Total :432.83
112023 5/28/2009 072254 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS CORP 05262009 COMCAST FRANCHISE RENEWAL CONSORTIUM
Comcast franchise renewal negotiations
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 1,241.80
Total :1,241.80
112024 5/28/2009 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 7276 PUBLIC DEFENDER
PUBLIC DEFENDER
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 800.00
Total :800.00
112025 5/28/2009 071979 SACKVILLE, JODI L 5/26/09 OT from sick leave buy back (3/12 -
OT from sick leave buy back (3/12 -
001.000.410.521.220.110.00 85.26
Total :85.26
112026 5/28/2009 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 134348 OPERATIONS MAINT
Compressor maint agreemt
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 1,150.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 109.25
22Page:
Packet Page 97 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112026 5/28/2009 (Continued)061482 SEA-WESTERN INC
OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING134536
fire gloves
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 195.00
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 7.99
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 19.28
Total :1,481.52
112027 5/28/2009 072553 SEFAC INC 90184 Shop Equipment Repair
Shop Equipment Repair
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 3,235.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 400.00
Total :3,635.00
112028 5/28/2009 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-199805 Unit eq43wq - Mounting supplies
Unit eq43wq - Mounting supplies
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 132.92
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 12.23
Total :145.15
112029 5/28/2009 071725 SKAGIT GARDENS INC 52151129 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
PLANTS & FLOWERS FOR CITY WIDE
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 875.02
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 83.13
Total :958.15
112030 5/28/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3430013627 OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER
OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 364.98
Total :364.98
112031 5/28/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2070015082 LIFT STATION #7
23Page:
Packet Page 98 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112031 5/28/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 125.77
SIGNAL LIGHT2330012283
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.78
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg2480017397
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 603.34
LIFT STATION #42540012560
LIFT STATION #4
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 425.00
SIGNAL LIGHT2790022228
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 50.19
LIBRARY3720012057
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,696.81
SIGNAL LIGHT4210013902
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 51.42
SIGNAL LIGHT4330014129
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 135.68
24Page:
Packet Page 99 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112031 5/28/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
Public Works4840011953
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 71.95
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 273.41
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 273.41
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 273.41
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 273.41
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 273.39
SIGNAL LIGHT5360023807
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 15.90
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX5390028164
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,782.64
CITY HALL5410010689
CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,077.68
Total :10,433.19
112032 5/28/2009 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES 5/26/09 Sno. Co. Cities dinner 5/21 (L. Carl)
Sno. Co. Cities dinner 5/21 (L. Carl)
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 35.00
Total :35.00
112033 5/28/2009 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER April 09 crime victims
crime victims
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 909.22
Total :909.22
112034 5/28/2009 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO June-2009 JUNE-2009 STANDARD INSURANCE
25Page:
Packet Page 100 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112034 5/28/2009 (Continued)060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO
06/09 Standard Insurance
811.000.000.231.550.000.00 19,911.78
Total :19,911.78
112035 5/28/2009 061782 STATE TREASURER 312 000 093 001 0005 MASTER LICENSE RENEWAL - ~ STORAGE
MASTER LICENSE RENEWAL - ~ STORAGE
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 429.00
Total :429.00
112036 5/28/2009 072742 STORRER, JENNIFER STORRER0526 REFUND
REFUND OF CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 269.00
Total :269.00
112037 5/28/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1648101 NEWSPAPER AD
5/19 Public Hearing
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 38.98
Total :38.98
112038 5/28/2009 062693 US BANK 3363 Black Box - Unit 651 - Supplies
26Page:
Packet Page 101 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112038 5/28/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Black Box - Unit 651 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 57.23
Black Box - Unit EQ55PO - Supplies
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 57.27
Radio Shack - Unit EQ55PO - Electrionic
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 34.26
Sea-Dog - Unit 477 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 55.03
Show Me Cables - Shop Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.97
Cables to Go - Unit 651
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.58
National Prod Inc - Unit 651 - Vehicle
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 46.20
JoAnns - Unit 477 - Sticky back black
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.02
Black Box - Credit3363
Black Box - Credit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -33.03
Black Box Credits
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -47.80
Total :247.73
112039 5/28/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY STATIONS
TELEMETRY STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.44
TELEMETRY STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.44
27Page:
Packet Page 102 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112039 5/28/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES425-712-8251
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 14.35
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 71.75
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 58.84
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 58.84
P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 83.22
Total :343.88
112040 5/28/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-NW4-3726 FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM
FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM
001.000.510.528.600.420.00 247.00
Total :247.00
112041 5/28/2009 047455 WA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION ATB90512007 PROJECT # DP00994R
Mgmnt & Support Fiber Optic Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 1,006.66
Total :1,006.66
112042 5/28/2009 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0900415 TRAINING MISC
TA,MF,TF,JS
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00
Total :400.00
112043 5/28/2009 045912 WASPC 40166 ELECTRONIC MONITORING
ELECTRONIC MONITORING
001.000.230.523.200.510.00 1,144.25
Total :1,144.25
112044 5/28/2009 061286 WESTERN FLUID COMPONENTS P-92494-0 Unit 55 - Plugs, caps
28Page:
Packet Page 103 of 244
05/28/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
11:59:30AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112044 5/28/2009 (Continued)061286 WESTERN FLUID COMPONENTS
Unit 55 - Plugs, caps
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 47.04
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.47
Total :51.51
112045 5/28/2009 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 905 MAY-2009 RETAINER
May, 2009 Retainer
001.000.360.515.230.410.00 11,330.00
Total :11,330.00
Bank total :519,546.5790 Vouchers for bank code :front
519,546.57Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report90
29Page:
Packet Page 104 of 244
AM-2301 2.D.
Claim for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Shawn Mitchell (amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute
entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
A Claim for Damages was submitted by the following individual:
Shawn Mitchell
7826 - 175th Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
(Amount Undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Mitchell Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/26/2009 03:43 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/26/2009 03:44 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/27/2009 09:25 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/26/2009 03:41
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/27/2009
Packet Page 105 of 244
Packet Page 106 of 244
Packet Page 107 of 244
Packet Page 108 of 244
Packet Page 109 of 244
Packet Page 110 of 244
Packet Page 111 of 244
Packet Page 112 of 244
Packet Page 113 of 244
AM-2306 2.E.
WSLCB List - May
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Linda Carl, Mayor's Office
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington
State Liquor Control Board, May 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The City Clerk's Office, the Police department, and the Mayor's Office have reviewed the attached
list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the liquor
licenses for the listed businesses.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: WSLCB list
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 09:08 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 09:11 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 09:12 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 05/28/2009 08:52
AM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 114 of 244
Packet Page 115 of 244
AM-2302 2.F.
Citizens Economic Development Commission
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton, Community Services Time:Consent
Department:Community Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the Edmonds City Code, Title 10, to
add a new Chapter 10.75, Citizens Economic Development Commission.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
April 21, 2009 - The Edmonds City Council approved Resolution No. 1198 regarding addressing
the long-term revenue challenges facing the City of Edmonds.
Narrative
A City of Edmonds Citizen Levy Review Committee met and completed its work in March and
April 2009. The review committee offered a series of recommendations to the City Council, one
of which was the development of a broad vision and long-term strategies to improve the fiscal
sustainability of the City.
Following several presentations by members of the Levy Review Committee, the City Council
approved Resolution No. 1198 which directs staff to create an ordinance forming a Citizens'
Economic Develoment Commission for the purposes of determining new strategies for economic
development within the City of Edmonds, and identifying new sources of revenue for the City to
consider. The attached Ordinance, if approved by the City Council, would establish an Economic
Development Commission through December 31, 2010.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Resolution 1198
Link: Exhibit 2 - Ordinance Establishing a Citizens Economic Development Commission
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/27/2009 09:25 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/27/2009 09:30 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/27/2009 01:36 PM APRV
Packet Page 116 of 244
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 05/26/2009 04:35
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/27/2009
Packet Page 117 of 244
Packet Page 118 of 244
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
5/4/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY CODE,
TITLE 10, TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 10.75 CITIZENS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the Citizens’ Levy Review Committee was tasked with reviewing
the financial situation of the City of Edmonds and has made a series of recommendations, and
WHEREAS, one of the Committee’s recommendations was the development of a
broad vision and long-term strategies to make the Edmonds fiscal situation sustainable without
recurring votes of the public for increased property taxes;
WHEREAS, the challenge of revenue in the City of Edmonds is multi-faceted
with a long history of policy decisions leading up to the state of the budget in 2009; and
WHEREAS, the primary budget problem of the City of Edmonds is one of
revenue, not expenses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the public interest to establish an
Economic Development Commission in order to take advantage of the large number of highly
qualified citizens who are interested in serving their community as it addresses this problem;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
{WSS727625.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 119 of 244
Section 1. The Edmonds City Code, Title 10, is hereby amended by the adoption
of a new Chapter 10.75 Citizens Economic Development Commission to read as follows:
Chapter 10.75
Citizens Economic Development Commission
10.75.010 Commission created - Membership.
10.75.020 Officers of commission - Meetings - Forum.
10.75.030 Powers and duties.
10.75.010 Commission created - Membership.
A. There is hereby created a Citizens Economic Development
Commission consisting of up to 17 members. The members shall
be appointed in the following manner. Each Council Member may
appoint up to two members. The Mayor may appoint up to three
members. In the event that any appointed member fails to attend
three consecutive meetings, or is otherwise unable to perform his
or her duties, that person may be replaced by the Mayor and
Council Member who originally appointed the member.
B. The term of appointments shall not exceed two years. The
Commission shall serve for a period of about two years until this
provision sunsets commencing upon the first meeting of the
Commission. The Commission shall sunset and expire December
31, 2010.
10.75.020 Officers of commission - Meetings - Forum.
Members of the Commission shall meet and organize by electing
from the members of the Commission a chairman and vice-
chairman and such other officers as may be determined by the
Commission. It shall be the duty of the chairman to preside at all
meetings. The vice chairman shall perform this duty in the
absence of the chairman. A majority of the filled positions on the
Commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business. A majority of the quorum may transact any particular
business of the Commission. The regular public meeting of the
Board shall be held at such time or place as may be determined by
the chairman or a majority of the members of the Commission.
Such meetings shall be considered special meetings and notice
shall be provided in accordance with City ordinance and state law.
{WSS727625.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 120 of 244
10.75.030 Powers and duties.
A. The Commission is empowered to advise and make
recommendations to the Mayor and City Council, and as
appropriate to the Planning Commission, Architectural Design
Board or other Boards or Commissions of the City on such matters
as may be specifically referred to the Commission by the Mayor or
City Council including but not limited to:
1. Determining new strategies for economic development
within the City of Edmonds;
2. Identifying new sources of revenue for the consideration of
the City Council.
B. The Commission shall deliver an annual report to the City
Council in written and oral form on or about the first meeting in
December of every year, and when appropriate, during other times
as directed by the Mayor or Council.
C. The Edmonds Economic Development Commission may
from time to time provide its reports and recommendations
regarding strategies for economic development and other matters
that will improve commercial viability, tourist development and
activity within the City. The Planning Board and Economic
Development Commission shall make joint recommendations on
such subjects to the City Council on or about the first meeting in
December.
Section 2. The Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 10.40
Planning Board is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 10.40.030 Coordinated
report - Citizens Economic Development Commission.
10.40.030 Coordinated report - Citizens Economic
Development Commission.
In addition to its other duties, the Planning Board shall review and
consider strategies for economic development in conjunction with
the Citizens Economic Development Commission. Such strategies
shall be designed to improve commercial viability, tourism
development and activity within the City of Edmonds. The
Planning Board and Citizens Economic Development Commission
shall report to the City Council on or about its first meeting in
December 2009 regarding its joint recommendations. This duty
shall sunset on December 31, 2010.
{WSS727625.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 121 of 244
Section 3. Sunset Clause. The provisions in this ordinance shall automatically
expire and sunset on December 31, 2010 unless sooner repealed or amended by act of the
Edmonds City Council.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of
the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS727625.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
Packet Page 122 of 244
{WSS727625.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
- 5 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
EDMONDS CITY CODE, TITLE 10, TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 10.75 CITIZENS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 123 of 244
AM-2309 2.G.
Amending Title 20 ECDC Relating to Land Use Permit Procedures
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance adopting new chapters and repealing certain chapters in Title 20 ECDC relating to
procedures for approving land use development permits; amending various ECDC sections that
reference sections in repealed chapters in Title 20 ECDC.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt the draft ordinance implementing the Council's decisions of May 26, 2009 (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
The City Council held a work session on the Planning Board recommendation on February 24,
2009. A public hearing was held on March 17, 2009, and Council directed the City Attorney to
prepare an ordinance to implement the Planning Board's recommendation. Subsequently, an
additional public hearing was held on May 5, 2009, with deliberations continued on May 26, 2009.
Narrative
During the meeting of May 26, 2009, the City Council completed their deliberations on
amendments to land use procedures found in Title 20 of the Edmonds Community Development
Code. Exhibit 2 contains a memo from City Attorney Scott Snyder summarizing the changes
included in the draft ordinance to implement the Council action taken on May 26th. The proposed
ordinance, including the changes, is attached as Exhibit 1.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Final Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - City Attorney Memo
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 03:37 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 03:39 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 04:02 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 05/28/2009 01:47
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 124 of 244
Packet Page 125 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING NEW CHAPTERS AND
REPEALING CERTAIN CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC
RELATING TO PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING LAND USE
DEVELOPMENT PERMITS; AMENDING VARIOUS ECDC
SECTIONS THAT REFERENCE SECTIONS IN REPEALED
CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds’ current process and procedures for approving
land use development permits require revision and modernization to conform more clearly and
accurately with procedures set forth in state statutes; and
WHEREAS, revision and modernization of the City’s process and procedures for
approving land use development permits is also an ideal opportunity to draft the applicable codes
to be more user friendly; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Planning Board, after public meetings and hearings to
consider improvements to the aforementioned process and procedure, forwarded to the City
Council its recommended amendments to Title 20 ECDC; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after holding a public hearing on the same,
approved the amendments to Title 20 ECDC recommended by the Planning Board; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Repealed. The following Chapters in Title 20 ECDC are hereby
repealed:
Packet Page 126 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
2
Chapter 20.90 ECDC Application Process.
Chapter 20.91 ECDC Public Hearings and Notice.
Chapter 20.95 ECDC Application and Staff Review.
Chapter 20.105 ECDC Appeals and Court Review.
Section 2. Repealed. Sections 20.100.000 (Scope), 20.100.010 (Hearing
examiner review), 20.100.020 (Planning advisory board review), and 20.100.030 (City council
action on recommendations) of Chapter 20.100 ECDC are hereby repealed.
Section 3. Retitled. Chapter 20.100 ECDC, Hearing Examiner, Planning
Advisory Board And City Council Review, is hereby retitled as Chapter 20.100 ECDC,
Miscellaneous Review.
Section 4. Adopted. New Chapters in Title 20 ECDC are hereby adopted to read
as hereto attached as Exhibit A.
Section 5. Amended. Subsection 4.85.090(D) of the Edmonds City Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
D. Notice of off street or on street areas designated in accordance with
subsection C above shall be clearly posted to provide reasonable notice.
Approval or denial of an off or on street area shall be appealable in the
same manner as if it were a Type II decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
Section 6. Amended. Subsection 7.10.065(C) of the Edmonds City Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
C. In the event the owner fails to connect to the sewer line within the 10-
day period or to provide the adequate assurances required by subparagraph
(B)(2) above, water service to such residential or commercial structures
and to the property on which they are located shall be discontinued.
Service shall not again be instituted until such time as the owner has
connected to the sewer system, paid the actual costs of the city including,
but not limited to, disconnecting, reconnecting, notifying the owner and
otherwise taking action with respect to the requirements of this section.
The actual cost thereof may vary, but the city council hereby establishes
such reconnection fee to be $250.00; provided, however, that in the event
the actual costs are greater, they may be imposed by written order of the
community services director or his designee and the reconnection shall not
Packet Page 127 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
3
be completed until such time such assessed costs are paid. In the event that
the owner or owners believe that the reconnection charges are in excess of
the amount actually incurred or which reasonably may be incurred the
city, the owner or owners may appeal the set fee or additionally designated
fee to the Hearing Examiner in the same manner as if it were a Type II
decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
Section 7. Amended. Subsection 7.80.110(B) of the Edmonds City Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
B. All existing multifamily residences will also be required to make
provisions for the collection of recyclables. It is recognized that in some
instances this may require changes to approved site plans including but not
limited to common areas of the building site and parking areas. It is also
recognized that the provision of recyclable collection facilities in existing
multifamily residences may also create violations of certain parts of the
zoning chapter. The staff will review proposed facilities for collection of
recyclables and/or yard waste, and will make a staff decision on whether a
more formal review by the architectural design board is necessary. Such
staff decisions shall be staff decisions rendered and appealable in the same
manner as if they were Type II decisions (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). In
the event that a required parking space needs to be utilized for a collection
facility, it shall still be counted toward meeting the parking requirements
in the Edmonds Community Development Code.
Section 8. Amended. Subsection 16.20.050(E)(1) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. The following applications for the following approvals shall be
processed as a Type II development project permit application (see
Chapter 20.01 ECDC):
Section 9. Amended. Subsection 16.20.050(F)(2) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. The request for waiver shall be reviewed by the hearing examiner as a
Type III-A decision and may be granted upon a finding that one of the
following sets of criteria have been met.
Section 10. Amended. Subsection 16.43.030(F)(1) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Packet Page 128 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
4
1. If a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the Edmonds historic
preservation commission under the provisions of Chapter 20.45 ECDC for
the proposed project, the staff may modify or waive any of the
requirements listed below that would otherwise apply to the expansion,
remodeling, or restoration of the building. The decision of staff shall be
processed as a Type II development project permit application (see
Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
Section 11. Amended. The first paragraph of Section 16.60.030, Site
development standards – Design standards., of the Edmonds Community Development Code is
hereby amended to read as follows (all subsections shall remain unchanged):
16.60.030 Site development standards – Design standards.
Design review by the architectural design board is required for any project
that includes buildings exceeding 60 feet in height in the CG zone or 75
feet in height in the CG2 zone. Projects not exceeding these height limits
may be reviewed by staff as a Type I decision. Regardless of what review
process is required, all projects proposed in the CG or CG2 zone must
meet the design standards contained in this section.
Section 12. Amended. Subsection 16.75.020(D)(5) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
5. A master plan may be approved as a comprehensive plan amendment,
a planned residential development (PRD), or as a contract rezone. The
planning advisory board and city council shall review and act upon a
proposed master plan as a Type V development project permit application
(see Chapter 20.01 ECDC), except in the case of a PRD, which shall be
reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 20.35 ECDC.
Section 13. Amended. Subsection 17.40.020(F) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
F. Restoration. If a nonconforming building or structure is destroyed or is
damaged in an amount equal to 75 percent or more of its replacement cost
at the time of destruction, said building shall not be reconstructed except
in full conformance with the provisions of the Edmonds Community
Development Code. Determination of replacement costs and the level of
destruction shall be made by the building official and shall be appealable
as a Type II staff decision under the provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Damage of less than 75 percent of replacement costs may be repaired, and
Packet Page 129 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
5
the building returned to its former size, shape and lot location as existed
before the damage occurred, if, but only if, such repair is initiated by the
filing of an application for a building permit which vests as provided in
ECDC 19.00.015, et seq., within one year of the date such damage
occurred. This right of restoration shall not apply if:
Section 14. Amended. Subsection 17.40.020(G)(4) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. A nonconforming residential single-family building may be rebuilt
within the defined building envelope if it is rebuilt with materials and
design which are substantially similar to the original style and structure
after complying with current codes. “Substantial compliance” shall be
determined by the city as a Type II staff decision, except that any appeal
of the staff decision shall be to the ADB rather than to the hearing
examiner. The decision of the ADB shall be final and appealable only as
provided in ECDC 20.07.006.
Section 15. Amended. Subsection 17.50.070(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Exceptions to the required parking standards in the downtown area.
When requested by the developer, the staff, using information provided by
the applicant, may decrease the required parking for a building listed on
the Edmonds register of historic places in order to retain historic elements
of the building during its expansion, remodeling or restoration. Any
building construction or remodeling activities serving as the justification
for the parking exception shall be consistent with the criteria and
procedures governing historic buildings contained in Chapter 20.45
ECDC. The decision on the parking exception shall be processed as a
Type II decision.
Section 16. Amended. Subsection 17.50.090(A)(3) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Applications for a conditional use permit, or an appeal of a staff
decision approving or denying a one-year extension thereof shall be
reviewed by the hearing examiner under the same terms and conditions as
any conditional use permit utilizing the criteria contained in Chapter 20.05
ECDC and under the procedural requirements contained in Chapter 20.06
ECDC. An application for a two-year extension shall be processed in the
same manner as an initial application for a conditional use permit for a
temporary parking lot and new or changed conditions may be imposed in
Packet Page 130 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
6
the course of that process. Decisions of the hearing examiner on granting
or extending conditional use permits for temporary parking lots shall be
appealable to the city council under the process contained in Chapter
20.07 ECDC.
Section 17. Amended. Subsection 17.70.005(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. The granting of a permit for a sales office or sales model shall be
processed as a Type I decision.
Section 18. Amended. Section 17.70.010, Other temporary buildings., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.70.010 Other temporary buildings.
Except as provided below in ECDC 17.70.030, a conditional use permit
shall be required to construct a temporary building in any zone. The
permit shall be valid for a period of one year; provided however, that said
permit may be extended by the community services director for a single
one-year extension upon submittal of a written application prior to the
expiration of the original permit. All the requirements of the zoning
district shall be met. Said application for a conditional use permit or an
appeal of the staff decision granting or denying the extension of such a
permit shall be reviewed by the hearing examiner in accordance with the
requirements for any other conditional use permit under Chapter 20.06
ECDC.
Section 19. Amended. Section 17.75.020, Primary uses requiring a conditional
use permit., of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
17.75.020 Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit.
Outdoor dining shall be a primary use requiring a conditional use permit in
the BN – neighborhood business zone, BC – community business zone,
BD – downtown business zone, CW – commercial waterfront zone, and
CG – general commercial zone, for outdoor seating which exceeds 10
percent of the existing interior seating in the establishment or more than
eight seats, whichever is greater. This use shall be established and
maintained only in accordance with the terms of a conditional use permit
approved by the hearing examiner as a Type III-B decision under the
Packet Page 131 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
7
procedural requirements contained in Chapter 20.06 ECDC. At a
minimum, the conditions considered for imposition by the hearing
examiner may include a restriction on operating hours, location of the
outdoor seating, and/or buffering of the noise and visual impacts related to
the outdoor dining seating. All seating permitted pursuant to the
conditional use permit shall be located outside of public rights-of-way. If
outdoor seating is approved under these provisions, no additional parking
stalls shall be required for the outdoor dining.
Section 20. Amended. Section 17.90.020, Approval., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.90.020 Approval.
The city staff will take general standards to the architectural design board
for approval. Once the architectural design board establishes general
standards, recycling boxes which meet general standards and comply with
the provisions of this chapter may be approved by the staff without further
review. Any decision made by the staff is appealable as if it were a Type II
decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). Boxes which do not meet general
standards shall be reviewed individually by the architectural design board
in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 20.10 ECDC upon payment
of the fee for such review.
Section 21. Amended. Section 17.90.050, Appeal., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.90.050 Appeal.
Any person cited with a notice of violation shall have 10 calendar days
from the date of mailing thereof to appeal from the findings of the notice.
Such appeal shall be to the city's hearing examiner as a Type II appeal of a
staff decision in accordance with Chapter 20.06 ECDC. Failure to appeal
shall create a presumption of violation in accordance with the provisions
of the notice of violation.
Section 22. Amended. Subsection 17.95.040(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Appeals of Final Decision. Major employers may file a written appeal
of the city's final decision regarding the following actions:
1. Rejection of an employer's proposed program;
Packet Page 132 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
8
2. Denial of an employer's requests for a waiver or modification of any of
the requirements of this chapter or a modification of the employer's
program;
Such appeals must be filed with the city within 10 calendar days after the
employer receives notice of a final decision. Timely appeals shall be heard
by the city's hearing examiner as if it were a Type II appeal of a staff
decision in accordance with Chapter 20.06 ECDC. The hearing examiner's
decision shall be final. Determinations on appeal shall be based on
whether the decision being appealed was consistent with this chapter or
applicable law.
Section 23. Amended. Subsection 17.100.030(B) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. Decision to approve, condition, or deny a CUP; to review a CUP; or
decline to renew a CUP shall be a Type III-B decision.
Section 24. Amended. Subsection 18.00.020(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Decision. The public works director shall decide whether to approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the application, based on the staff analysis
and comments from other city departments. The decision shall be in
writing and shall be appealable to the hearing examiner pursuant to
Chapter 20.06 ECDC as if it were a Type II decision. No application may
be approved that conflicts with any portion of the community development
code, unless that portion is specifically subject to waiver or variance.
Section 25. Amended. Section 18.05.040, Variances., of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.05.040 Variances.
Applications for variances from the underground requirements of this
chapter shall be reviewed by the community services director as a Type II
development project permit application (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). For
the purposes of this chapter, the special circumstances necessary to justify
a variance from the undergrounding provisions of this chapter shall be
limited to technological impracticability of any required underground
installation or to a finding that the cost of the underground installation is
excessive in light of the benefits derived and outweighs the benefits to be
Packet Page 133 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
9
gained by the public.
Section 26. Amended. Subsection 18.45.045(B) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. Upon receipt of the application for a clearing permit, the staff shall
inspect the site and contiguous properties. If the staff determines that the
plan is in compliance with the provisions of this section and will result in
the removal of no more trees or vegetation than is necessary to achieve the
proposed development or improvement, the permit shall be approved as a
Type II decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
Section 27. Amended. Section 18.45.055, Notice., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.45.055 Notice.
Notice to surrounding property owners shall be provided pursuant to
ECDC 20.02.004, informing them of the application for a clearing permit.
Section 28. Amended. Section 18.45.060, Appeals., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.45.060 Appeals.
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the staff regarding a clearing
permit may appeal such decision to the hearing examiner within 10
working days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall comply with the
provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Section 29. Amended. Subsection 18.50.020(C)(2) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. In the event that any applicant believes that the dedication requirement
is in excess of that required to mitigate the applicant's actual development
impacts, the applicant may appeal the staff decision to the hearing
examiner as if it were a Type II decision in accordance with Chapter 20.06
ECDC. On appeal a dedication shall be required only if:
Section 30. Amended. Subsection 18.80.010(Notes)(4) of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Packet Page 134 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
10
4 If the fire chief and public works director can demonstrate that the fire
fighting or rescue operations may be impaired by limited roadway width,
the right-of-way width and paving requirements for a street or access
easement may be increased and/or additional paved or graveled shoulders
required. Both such decisions shall be staff decisions rendered and
appealable as if they were Type II decisions in accordance with Chapter
20.06 ECDC.
Section 31. Amended. Subsection 18.80.060(B)(5)(c) of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
c. In such cases, the city engineer may then consider use of an existing
common driveway or other alternative. Only when no other reasonable
alternative exists for access to a property will a curb cut be approved
which results in the loss of existing on-street parking. No more than one
access point per lot will be permitted in the downtown business area. The
city engineer's decision to approve alternative access shall be processed as
a Type II project permit application and decision (see Chapter 20.01
ECDC).
Section 32. Amended. Subsection 18.80.060(C)(1) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. Except as otherwise provided, the width of any residential driveway
shall not exceed 20 feet exclusive of the radii of the turns, with such
measurement being made parallel with the center line of the street.
Driveway approaches shall extend from the edge of the existing street a
distance of 20 feet or to the edge of the property line, whichever is greater.
Approaches shall be constructed of asphalt concrete pavement or an
equivalent approved by the city engineer. The standard width for
commercial and other nonresidential streets shall be 30 feet. At the
application of the applicant or the city engineer, additional width in excess
of the established standard may be approved as a staff decision to a
maximum width of 40 feet. Such decision shall be made only after notice
as a Type II project permit application and decision (see Chapter 20.01
ECDC). Such application shall be approved only if: (a) it conforms to the
provisions of the comprehensive plan; (b) is found to be in the public
interest when the needs of the applicant are reviewed and balanced in light
of the benefits to the general public and the impacts, if any, on the
immediate neighborhood; and (c) is consistent with or enhances public
safety and will not create a hazard to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle
traffic. The public works director may authorize additional residential
driveway width for three-car garages and for access driveways necessary
for off-street parking or recreational vehicles.
Packet Page 135 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
11
Section 33. Amended. Subsection 18.82.070(E) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
E. The decision of the director may be appealed to the hearing examiner
as a Type II decision in accordance with Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Section 34. Amended. Subsection 19.00.005(A)(6)(e) of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
e. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended
shall be a total of three (3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period
starting from the original date of permit issuance, the permit shall become
null and void and a new building permit shall be required, with full permit
fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The voiding of the prior
permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or building codes.
Whenever an appeal is filed and a necessary development approval is
stayed in accordance with ECDC 20.07.004, the time limit periods
imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision.
Section 35. Amended. Subsection 19.00.025(B)(5) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
5. Any decision of the city staff regarding the application stated in this
section and its interpretation shall be considered a Type I decision
appealable only to the superior court of Snohomish County by Land Use
Petition Act.
Section 36. Amended. Subsection 19.10.040(A) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Notices of permit submittal application with the city shall be posted by
the applicant pursuant to ECDC 20.02.004 and ECDC 20.03.002(A). Such
notices shall be conspicuously posted and maintained at each street
frontage at the applicant's expense pursuant to ECDC 20.03.001(A).
Notice of permit issuance or denial shall be conspicuously posted as
required above. Upon each posting a 10-day appeal period shall
commence. Appeals shall be to the Snohomish County superior court in
accordance with the Land Use Petition Act, and no other appeal shall be
permitted.
Packet Page 136 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
12
Section 37. Amended. Section 20.05.020, General requirements., of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.05.020 General requirements.
A. Review. The hearing examiner shall review and decide on conditional
use permit applications as Type III-B decisions as set forth in ECDC
20.01.003.
B. Appeals. Appeals of the hearing examiner’s decisions shall be to the
city council in accordance with Chapter 20.07 ECDC. Subsequent appeals
shall be to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the
Land Use Petition Act.
C. Time Limit. Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no
building permit is required, substantially commences the use allowed
within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use permit shall
expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an
extension of time before the expiration date.
D. Review of Extension Application. An application for any extension of
time shall be reviewed by the community development director as a Type
II decision.
E. Location. A conditional use permit applies only to the property for
which it has been approved and may not be transferred to any other
property.
F. Denial. A conditional use permit application may be denied if the
proposal cannot be conditioned so that the required findings can be made.
Section 38. Amended. Section 20.10.040, Optional pre-application., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.10.040 Optional pre-application.
The applicant may submit plans required under ECDC 20.02.002 as part
of the complete application in preliminary or sketch form, so that the
comments and advice of the architectural design board may be
incorporated into the final plans submitted for application.
Section 39. Amended. Section 20.11.010, Review procedure - General design
review., of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Packet Page 137 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
13
20.11.010 Review procedure – General design review.
A. Review. The architectural design board (ADB) shall review all
proposed developments that require a threshold determination under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). All other developments may be
approved by staff as a Type I decision. When design review is required by
the ADB, proposed development shall be processed as a Type III-B
decision. The role of the ADB shall be dependent upon the nature of the
application as follows:
1. The ADB shall conduct a public hearing for the following types of
applications:
a. Applications that are not consolidated as set forth in ECDC
20.01.002(B).
b. Applications that are consolidated as set forth in ECDC 20.01.002(B)
but in which the ADB serves as the sole decision-making authority.
c. Applications that are consolidated as set forth in ECDC 20.01.002(B)
but in which all decision-making authority is exercised both by staff,
pursuant to this chapter and Chapter 20.13 ECDC, and by the ADB. The
ADB shall act in the place of the staff for these types of applications.
2. The ADB shall review proposed developments at public meetings
without a public hearing and make recommendations to the hearing
examiner to approve, conditionally approve, or deny proposals for
developments that, although consolidated as set forth in ECDC
20.01.002(B), are not subject to a public hearing by the ADB under
subsection (A)(1) of this section. The hearing examiner shall subsequently
hold a public hearing on the proposal.
3. The ADB under subsection (A)(1) of this section and the hearing
examiner under subsection (A)(2) of this section shall approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the proposal. The ADB or hearing
examiner may continue its public hearing on the proposal to allow changes
to the proposal, or to obtain information needed to properly review the
proposal. See ECC 3.13.090 regarding exemptions from review required
by this chapter.
4. Notwithstanding any contrary requirement, for a development in
which the city is the applicant, the action of the ADB under subsection
(A)(1) of this section and the hearing examiner under subsection (A)(2) of
this section shall be a recommendation to the city council.
B. Notice. Public notice by mail, posting or newspaper publication shall
Packet Page 138 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
14
only be required for applications that are subject to environmental review
under Chapter 43.21C RCW, in which case notice of the hearing shall be
provided in accordance with Chapter 20.03 ECDC.
Section 40. Amended. Section 20.11.040, Appeals., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.11.040 Appeals.
All design review decisions of the hearing examiner or the ADB are
appealable to the city council as provided in Chapter 20.07 ECDC.
Section 41. Amended. Subsection 20.11.050(B)(3) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Review of Extension Application. An application for an extension
shall be reviewed by the planning official as a Type I decision (Staff
decision – No notice required).
Section 42. Amended. Section 20.12.010, Applicability., of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.12.010 Applicability.
The architectural design board (ADB) shall review all proposed
developments that require a threshold determination under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) using the process set forth in ECDC
20.12.020, below. All other developments may be approved by staff as a
Type I decision using the process set forth in ECDC 20.12.030, below.
When design review is required by the ADB under ECDC 20.12.020, the
application shall be processed as a Type III-B decision.
Section 43. Amended. Subsection 20.12.020(A) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Public hearing – Phase 1. Phase 1 of the public hearing shall be
scheduled with the Architectural Design Board (ADB) as a public
meeting. Notice of the meeting shall be provided according to the
requirements of ECDC 20.03.004. This notice may be combined with the
formal Notice of Application required under ECDC 20.03.002, as
appropriate.
Packet Page 139 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
15
Section 44. Amended. Subsection 20.12.020(B)(3) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Phase 2 of the public hearing shall be conducted by the ADB as a
continuation the Phase 1 public hearing. Notice of the meeting shall be
provided according to the requirements of Chapter 20.03 ECDC. During
Phase 2 of the public hearing, the ADB shall review the application and
identify any conditions that the proposal must meet prior to the issuance of
any permit or approval by the city. When conducting this review, the ADB
shall enter the following findings prior to issuing its decision on the
proposal:
Section 45. Amended. Section 20.12.080, Appeals., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.12.080 Appeals.
A. Design review decisions by the ADB pursuant to ECDC 20.12.020.B
are appealable to the city council as provided in Chapter 20.07 ECDC.
These are the only decisions by the ADB in this chapter that are
appealable.
B. All design review decisions of the hearing examiner are appealable to
the city council as provided in Chapter 20.07 ECDC.
C. Design review decisions by staff under the provisions of ECDC
20.12.030 are only appealable to the extent that the applicable building
permit or development approval is an appealable decision under the
provisions of the ECDC. Design review by staff is not in itself an
appealable decision.
Section 46. Amended. Subsection 20.12.090(B)(3) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Review of Extension Application. An application for an extension
shall be reviewed by the planning official as a Type I decision (Staff
Decision – No Notice Required).
Section 47. Amended. Subsection 20.15A.240(D) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. Appeals shall be governed by the procedures specified in Chapter
Packet Page 140 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
16
20.06 ECDC.
Section 48. Amended. Section 20.16.110, Reconsideration and appeal., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.16.110 Reconsideration and appeal.
Reconsideration of the hearing examiner's ruling shall be governed by
ECDC 20.06.010. Appeal of the hearing examiner's ruling shall be
governed by Chapter 20.07 ECDC.
Section 49. Amended. Subsection 20.16.130(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Building permits for an EPF which fail to comply with the conditions
of approval shall be suspended and a report made to the director. The
director shall institute a proceeding before the hearing examiner to permit
the EPF's sponsor a hearing at which to show cause why its conditional
use permit should not be revoked or further conditioned. Such hearing
shall be conducted as if it were a Type III-A decision in accordance with
Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Section 50. Amended. Section 20.19.010, Conditional use permit required., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.19.010 Conditional use permit required.
When a conditional use permit is required by the provisions of Title 16
ECDC relating to the zoning districts, conditional use permit applications
for operation of a mini day-care shall be processed as a Type II decision
(Staff Decision – Notice Required) utilizing the criteria set forth in this
chapter. In addition to the specific criteria set forth herein, the staff and
hearing examiner on appeal shall also review the application under the
criteria and required findings set forth in Chapter 20.05 ECDC relating to
conditional use permits in order to establish that the proposed facility is
not deleterious to the immediately surrounding neighborhood nor
constitutes a public nuisance. The director of community services or
designee, or the hearing examiner on appeal, may impose reasonable
conditions on the approval of the conditional use permit for mini day-care
facilities in order to ensure that the criteria of ECDC 20.19.020 are met
and that the facility is in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood.
The hearing examiner’s decision on appeal shall be final.
Packet Page 141 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
17
Section 51. Amended. Section 20.19.050, Conditional use permit required., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.19.050 Appeal.
Appeals may be taken from staff decision to the hearing examiner under
the provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC. An appellant may challenge the
imposition of conditions or may elect to challenge a later determination as
to whether those conditions have been met. The hearing examiner’s
decision on appeal shall be final.
Section 52. Amended. Subsection 20.20.010(B) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. A home occupation which does not meet one or more of the
requirements of subsection A of this section may be approved as a
conditional use permit (Type III-B decision) pursuant to Chapter 20.05
ECDC and the procedures set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC, if the home
occupation:
Section 53. Amended. Subsection 20.21.030(A) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Permit Required. Any person who occupies or permits another person
to occupy an attached accessory dwelling unit as a place of residence shall
first obtain a permit. The permit shall be reviewed and processed as a
Type II decision (Staff decision – Notice required).
Section 54. Amended. Section 20.30.010, Application., of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.30.010 Application.
In addition to the information required by ECDC 20.02.002, the applicant
shall provide the written consent of all owners of the affected land.
Section 55. Amended. Section 20.30.020, Review., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.30.020 Review.
Packet Page 142 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
18
The community development director shall review applications for joint
use of parking as a Type II decision (Staff decision – Notice required)
using the criteria of this chapter as a basis for review.
Section 56. Amended. Section 20.40.030, Notice., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.40.030 Notice.
Notice of rezone hearings (and text change) before the planning board
shall be the same as set forth for proposed amendments to the
comprehensive plan in ECDC 20.00.020 for newspaper publication, and
pursuant to ECDC 20.03.004.
Section 57. Amended. Section 20.55.010, Application requirements., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.55.010 Application requirements.
In addition to the material required in ECDC 20.02.002, the application
shall contain all material required by WAC 173-14-110, or as the same
may be amended.
Section 58. Amended. Section 20.55.020, Notice., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.55.020 Notice.
A. Publication. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 20.03 ECDC,
notice shall be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation
in Edmonds at least once a week on the same day of the week for two
consecutive weeks. Except as provided hereafter in ECDC 20.55.025, the
last day of publication shall be at least 30 days before the first public
hearing on the permit.
B. Contents. Except as provided hereafter in ECDC 20.55.025, and in
addition to the requirements of Chapter 20.03 ECDC, the notice of the
hearing examiner shall state that before the first pubic hearing, any person
may request a copy of the final action on the permit. The notice shall also
contain all information required by WAC 173-14-070, or as the same may
be amended.
Packet Page 143 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
19
Section 59. Amended. Section 20.55.030, Review., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.55.030 Review.
The hearing examiner shall review and issue decisions on shoreline
permits as a Type III-B decision, using the criteria contained in the city
shoreline master program, Chapter 23.10 ECDC, the policies of the
Shoreline Act and of Chapter 173-14 WAC, or as the same may be
amended.
Section 60. Amended. Subsection 20.60.015(A) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Staff Approval. Except as referred to the architectural design board
pursuant to subsections (A)(1) of this section, and except as provided in
subsection B of this section, the planning manager, or designee, shall
review all applications for design review under this chapter, and shall
approve, conditionally approve or deny the application in accordance with
the policies of ECDC 20.10.000, the criteria set forth in ECDC 20.10.070,
and the standards and requirements of this chapter. The decision of the
planning manager on any sign permit application may be appealed to the
hearing examiner pursuant to the procedure established in Chapter 20.06
ECDC for appeal of Type II staff decisions.
Section 61. Amended. Section 20.65.010, Review., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.65.010 Review.
The Planning Board shall review proposed changes to the official street
map as a Type V decision, using as the basis for its review and
recommendation the purposes of the comprehensive plan as stated in
Chapter 15.05 ECDC, and the purposes of the Comprehensive Street Plan,
as stated in Chapter 15.40 ECDC, and the purposes of the official street
map, as stated in Chapter 18.50 ECDC.
Section 62. Amended. The first paragraph of Section 20.75.040, Application., of
the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows (all
subsections shall remain unchanged):
Packet Page 144 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
20
20.75.040 Application.
Applications for subdivisions shall be made to the community
development director on forms provided by the community development
department. A subdivision application will be processed concurrently with
any applications for rezones, variances, planned unit developments, site
plan approvals and other similar approvals, that relate to the proposed
subdivision, unless the applicant expressly requests sequential processing.
The application shall contain the following items in addition to those
specified in ECDC 20.02.002:
Section 63. Amended. Subsection 20.75.050(G) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
G. Review. A certified determination of the planning manager or his/her
designee may be appealed to the hearing examiner as a Type II decision as
set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Section 64. Amended. Subsection 20.75.055(D) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. The director's decision shall be issued in writing and shall be mailed to
all properties within 300 feet of the site. Appeal may be taken from the
director's decision within 10 working days of mailing of the decision and
posting thereof in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Section 65. Amended. Section 20.75.065, Preliminary review., of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.75.065 Preliminary review.
A. Responsibility for Review. The community development director, or a
designated planning staff member, is in charge of administering the
preliminary review of all subdivisions. The public works director and the
fire department, and other departments if needed, shall participate in
preliminary review by appropriate recommendations on subjects within
their respective areas of expertise.
B. Notice of Hearing.
1. When the director of community services has accepted a subdivision
for filing, he shall set a date of hearing, and give notice of the hearing as
provided in ECDC 20.03.004, and by the following for a formal
Packet Page 145 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
21
subdivision:
a. One publication in a newspaper of general circulation within
Snohomish County pursuant to Chapter 1.03 ECC and posting notice in
three conspicuous places within 300 feet of any portion of the boundary of
the proposed formal subdivision not less than 10 days prior to the hearing.
b. Mailing to a city if a proposed formal subdivision is adjacent or within
one mile of the city's boundary, or the proposed subdivision would use the
utilities of the city.
c. Mailing to the county if a proposed formal subdivision is adjacent to
the city-county boundary.
d. Mailing to the State Department of Highways if a proposed formal
subdivision is adjacent to a state highway right-of-way.
e. The notice must include a legal description and either a vicinity
location sketch or a location description in nonlegal language.
C. Time Limits for Staff Review. Staff review shall be completed within
20 working days from the date of filing.
D. Formal Subdivision Review. The hearing examiner shall review a
formal subdivision as a Type III-A decision in accordance with provisions
of Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
E. Short Subdivisions – Staff Review. The director of community
services shall review a short subdivision as a Type II decision (Staff
Decision – Notice Required).
F. Appeal of Staff Decision. Any person may appeal to the hearing
examiner a Type II decision of the community development director on a
short subdivision under the procedure set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
Section 66. Amended. Subsection 20.75.110(A) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Preliminary Plats. The community development director may approve
as a Type II decision (Staff Decision – Notice Required), minor changes to
an approved preliminary plat, or its conditions of approval. If the proposal
involves additional lots, rearrangements of lots or roads, additional
impacts to surrounding property, or other major changes, the proposal
shall be reviewed in the same manner as the original application.
Application fees shall be as set in Chapter 15.00 ECDC.
Packet Page 146 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
22
Section 67. Amended. Subsection 20.75.155(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Staff Review. The director of public works and the community
development director shall review the final plat of a formal subdivision.
They shall then forward the final plat to the city council for a Type IV-A
decision after having signed the statements required by ECDC 20.75.140
or attaching their recommendation for disapproval.
Section 68. Amended. Section 20.75.158, Short plat - Staff review., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.75.158 Short plat – Staff review.
The community services director, through his/her designees, the director
of public works and the community development director shall conduct an
administrative review of a proposed short subdivision and either sign the
statements required by ECDC 20.75.140, if all requirements of this
chapter have been met, or disapprove such action, stating their reasons in
writing. Such administrative action shall be final subject only to right of
appeal to the hearing examiner as a Type II decision under Chapter 20.06
ECDC. Dedication of any interest in property contained in an approval of
the short subdivision shall be forwarded to the city council for formal
acceptance on its consent agent; provided, however, that such acceptance
shall not stay any approval, time period for appeal or the effective date of
the short subdivision.
Section 69. Amended. Section 20.80.020, Zoning and planning changes., of the
Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.80.020 Zoning and planning changes.
A. Review. Amendments to the following text materials (and where
applicable maps, and other incorporated codes or codifications within
them) before amendment by the city council shall first be reviewed by the
planning advisory board as a Type V decision using the purposes and
criteria set forth in the applicable chapters as the basis for its review and
recommendations:
1. Title 15 ECDC, Comprehensive Plan, except application and permit
fees.
Packet Page 147 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
23
2. Title 16 ECDC, Zoning Districts.
3. Title 17 ECDC, General Zoning, Regulations.
4. Title 20 ECDC, Review Criteria and Procedure, excluding:
a. Chapter 20.15A ECDC, Environmental Review (SEPA);
b. Chapter 20.70 ECDC, Street Vacations.
5. Chapter 18.50 ECDC, Official Street Map.
B. Notice. See ECDC 20.03.004.
C. When the city council, in its discretion, deems it appropriate to adopt
pre-annexation zoning comparable to that in effect in Snohomish County
for a proposed annexation area, the procedural and notice requirements of
RCW 35A.14.340 shall control over the provisions of this chapter,
Chapter 20.03 ECDC and ECDC 20.02.004. In the event that the city
council determines it appropriate to zone property proposed for annexation
to the city in a category which is not comparable to zoning in effect in
Snohomish County, the provisions of this chapter, Chapter 20.03 ECDC
and ECDC 20.02.004 shall apply. Any change to pre-annexation zoning
proposed after annexation to the city shall also comply with the provisions
of this chapter, Chapter 20.03 ECDC and ECDC 20.02.004.
Section 70. Amended. Section 20.85.020, General requirements., of the Edmonds
Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.85.020 General requirements.
A. Review. The hearing examiner shall review variances as Type III-B
decisions in accordance with provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
B. Appeals. Appeals of the hearing examiner’s decisions shall be to the
city council in accordance with Chapter 20.07 ECDC. Subsequent appeals
shall be to the Snohomish County superior court in accordance with the
Land Use Petition Act.
C. Time Limit. The approved variance must be acted on by the owner
within one year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and
be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of
time before the expiration and the city approves the application.
D. Review of Extension Application. An application for an extension of
Packet Page 148 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
24
time shall be reviewed by the community development director as a Type
II decision (Staff Decision – Notice Required).
E. Location. A variance applies only to the property for which it has been
approved and may not be transferred to any other property.
Section 71. Amended. Subsection 20.100.040(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Review Procedure.
1. The director of community services shall notify the permittee in writing
that the permit is being reviewed, list the alleged deficiencies, and specify
a reasonable time for the permittee to correct the deficiencies.
2. If the permittee could reasonably correct the deficiencies, but fails to do
so within the specified time, the director of community services may refer
the matter to the city attorney for criminal or civil enforcement of the city
code, or the conditions of the permit.
3. If the only reasonable ways to correct the deficiencies are for the
permittee to cease the permitted activity, or for the city to impose new or
changed conditions on the permit, the director of community services shall
refer the matter to the hearing examiner for review.
4. The hearing examiner’s review shall be processed as a Type III decision
(depending on the decision it may be a Type III-A or B - See subsection
(C)(6) below). The hearing examiner shall review the permit or approval,
using criteria required for the original permit, and subsection (A) of this
section.
5. If the hearing examiner finds that deficiencies exist, and that they can
be reasonably corrected by imposing new or changed conditions on the
permit, the permit conditions may be changed. The hearing examiner's
actions shall be final, unless the original approval required city council
approval. In that case, the hearing examiner's action shall be a
recommendation to the council to be considered by the council as a Type
IV-B decision (except that the recommendation and open record hearing
are from and before the hearing examiner).
6. If the hearing examiner finds that the only reasonable way to correct the
deficiencies is for the permittee to cease the permitted activity, the hearing
examiner may revoke the permit. The hearing examiner's action shall be
appealable to the city council as a Type III-B decision.
7. If the permit is revoked, the permit shall be null and void, and all
activity allowed by the permit shall cease.
Packet Page 149 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
25
Section 72. Amended. Section 20.100.050, Forest Practices Act moratorium., of
the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.100.050 Forest Practices Act moratorium.
Whenever the city is notified by the Washington State Department of
Natural Resources (hereinafter DNR) that a violation of the Forest
Practices Act has occurred, pursuant to the requirements of RCW
79.09.060, the city, by the director of development services or designee,
shall impose a six-year moratorium on that portion of the property or
project which has been converted from forest use, as such term is defined
by statute or the order of DNR. The moratorium may be conditioned in
order to preserve public safety and prevent further environmental damage.
A. The owner of the property or permittee impacted by the moratorium or
any property owner within 300 feet of the site:
1. May appeal the nature and extent of the moratorium as if it were a Type
II decision to the hearing examiner under Chapter 20.06 ECDC.; or
2. May apply to the director at any time during the six-year period for a
lifting of the moratorium. The moratorium shall be lifted only upon a
showing by the owner or permittee that all significant issues identified by
the director relating to safety, aesthetics, the violation of any city permit
condition of approval and any violation of city code will be fully mitigated
by the action of the permittee. In the event that any issue has not been
fully mitigated, the lifting of the moratorium may be conditioned upon the
future satisfaction of conditions or by a bond or other surety designed to
mitigate the negative impacts of the applicant's actions and/or violations.
The director's review shall be processed as a Type II decision, and may be
appealed to the hearing examiner under Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
B. In the event that the city has initiated a review of an approved permit
pursuant to the provisions of this section, the procedures in subsection (A)
of this section shall not apply and a hearing regarding whether, and under
what conditions, a moratorium may be lifted, shall be consolidated with a
hearing under ECDC 20.100.040.
Section 73. Amended. Section 23.40.200, Appeals., of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
23.40.200 Appeals.
Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or
other activity based on the requirements of this title may be appealed
Packet Page 150 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
26
according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or
approval involved.
Section 74. Amended. Subsection 23.40.210(C) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Hearing Examiner Review. The city hearing examiner shall, as a Type
III-B decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC), review variance applications
and conduct a public hearing. The hearing examiner shall approve,
approve with conditions, or deny variance applications based on a
proposal's ability to comply with general and specific variance criteria
provided in subsections (A) and (B) of this section.
Section 75. Amended. Subsection 23.40.210(E) of the Edmonds Community
Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
E. Time Limit. The director shall prescribe a time limit within which the
action for which the variance is required shall be begun, completed, or
both. Failure to begin or complete such action within the established time
limit shall void the variance, unless the applicant files an application for
an extension of time before the expiration. An application for an extension
of time shall be reviewed by the director as a Type II decision (see
Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
Section 76. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 77. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect five (5) days after
passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Packet Page 151 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
27
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 152 of 244
{BFP729870.DOC;1/00006.150243/} 28
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of
Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said
ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING
NEW CHAPTERS AND REPEALING CERTAIN CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC
RELATING TO PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING LAND USE DEVELOPMENT
PERMITS; AMENDING VARIOUS ECDC SECTIONS THAT REFERENCE
SECTIONS IN REPEALED CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 153 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
1
EXHIBIT A
Chapter 20.01
TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Sections:
20.01.001 Procedures for processing development project permits.
20.01.002 Determination of proper procedure type.
20.01.003 Development project permit application framework.
20.01.004 Joint public hearings.
20.01.005 Decisions.
20.01.006 Legislative enactments not restricted.
20.01.007 Exemptions from development project permit application processing.
20.01.001 Procedures for processing development project permits.
A. For the purpose of development project permit processing, all development
project permit applications shall be classified as one of the following as addressed and
referenced in ECDC 20.01.003: Type I, Type II, Type III or Type IV. Legislative
decisions are Type V actions, and are addressed in ECDC 20.01.005. Exclusions from the
requirements of development project permit application processing are contained in
ECDC 20.01.003(B).
B. Unless otherwise specified, all references to days shall be calendar days.
Whenever the last day of a deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday designated
by RCW 1.16.050 or by a city ordinance, or any day when city hall or the City’s
Development Services Department is closed to the public by formal executive or
legislative action the deadline shall run until the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday,
holiday or closed day.
20.01.002 Determination of proper procedure type.
A. Determination by Director. The Development Services Director or his/her
designee (hereinafter the “director”) shall determine the proper procedure for all
development project applications. Questions concerning the appropriate procedure shall
be resolved in favor of the higher numbered procedure.
B. Optional Consolidated Permit Processing. An application that involves two or
more procedures may be processed collectively under the highest numbered procedure
required for any part of the application or may be processed individually under each of
the application procedures identified in ECDC 20.01.003. The applicant may determine
whether the application will be processed collectively or individually. If the applications
are processed individually, the highest numbered type procedure shall be undertaken first,
followed by the other procedures in sequence from the highest numbered to the lowest.
Packet Page 154 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
2
C. Decisionmaker(s). Applications processed in accordance with subsection B of this
section which have the same procedure number, but are assigned to different hearing
bodies, shall be heard collectively by the highest decisionmaker; the city council being
the highest body, followed by the hearing examiner or Planning Board, as applicable, and
then the director. Joint public hearings with other agencies shall be processed according
to ECDC 20.01.004. Concurrent public hearings held with the design review board and
any other decisionmaker shall proceed with both decisionmakers present.
20.01.003 Development project permit application framework.
A. Decisions.
TYPE I TYPE II TYPE III-A TYPE III-B TYPE IV-A Type IV-B TYPE V
Statement of
zoning
restriction
Modification
to landscape
plans
Plat vacations
and
alterations
Essential
Public
Facilities
Final plats Site specific
/ contract
rezone
Development
agreements
Boundary
line
adjustments,
lot line
adjustment,
lot
combination
Formal
interpretation
of the text of
the ECDC by
the Director or
designated
staff
Shoreline
substantial
development,
shoreline
variance
Architectural
Design
review
Final
Planned
Residential
Development
Zoning text
amendments;
area-wide
zoning map
amendments
Permitted
uses not
requiring site
plan review
Home
occupation
permit
Preliminary
Planned
Residential
Development
General
variance,
Sign permit
variance
Comprehensive
plan
amendments
Special use
permits
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Conditional
use
Conditional
use
Annexations
Minor
amendments
to Planned
Residential
Development
Draft
environmental
impact
statement /
SEPA
determinations
General
variances,
and sign
permit
variances,
Shoreline:
substantial
development,
conditional
use, and
variance
Development
regulations
Minor
Preliminary
Plat
amendment
Revisions to
shoreline
management
permits
Site
plan/major
amendments
to site plans
Draft
environmental
impact
statement
Master Plan
Minor design
review
Administrative
variances /
CUP’s
Preliminary
plats
Sign permits Short plat
Land clearing/
grading
Packet Page 155 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
3
B. The following permits or approvals are specifically excluded from the procedures
set forth in this Title: landmark designations, building permits, street vacations, street use
permits, encroachment permits, and other public works permits issued under Title 18.
C. Action Type.
PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT
APPLICATIONS
(TYPE I – IV) LEGISLATIVE
TYPE
I
TYPE
II
TYPE
III-A
TYPE
III-B
TYPE
IV-A
TYPE
IV-B
TYPE
V
Recommendation
by:
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Planning Board Planning Board
Final decision
by:
Director Director Hearing
examiner
Hearing
examiner
/ ADB
City
council
City
council
City
council
Notice of
application:
No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Open record
public hearing or
open record
appeal of a final
decision:
No Only if
appealed,
open
record
hearing
before
hearing
examiner
Yes,
before
hearing
examiner
to render
final
decision
Yes,
before
hearing
examiner
or board
to render
final
decision
No Yes, before
Planning Board
which makes
recommendation
to council
Yes, before
Planning Board
which makes
recommendation
to council
Closed record
review:
No No No Yes,
before
the
council
No Yes,
before
the
council
Yes, or council
could hold its
own hearing
Judicial appeal: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
20.01.004 Joint public hearings.
A. Administrator’s Decision to Hold Joint Hearing. The director may combine any
public hearing on a development project permit application with any hearing that may be
held by another local, state, regional, federal, or other agency, on the proposed action, as
long as: (1) the hearing is held within the city limits; and (2) the requirements of
subsection C of this section are met.
B. Applicant’s Request for a Joint Hearing. The applicant may request that the public
hearing on a permit application be combined as long as the joint hearing can be held
Packet Page 156 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
4
within the time periods set forth in this title. In the alternative, the applicant may agree to
a particular schedule if that additional time is needed in order to complete the hearings.
C. Prerequisites to Joint Public Hearing. A joint public hearing may be held with
another local, state, regional, federal or other agency and the city, when:
1. The other agency is not expressly prohibited by statute from doing so;
2. Sufficient notice of the hearing is given to meet each of the agencies’
adopted notice requirements as set forth in statutes, ordinances, or rules;
3. The agency has received the necessary information about the proposed
project from the applicant in enough time to hold its hearing at the same time as the city
hearing; or
4. The hearing is held within the geographic boundary of the city.
20.01.005 Decisions.
A. Administrative Decisions. Type I and II decisions are administrative.
Administrative decisions are made by the Director. Unless otherwise provided, appeals
of Type II decisions shall be initiated as set forth in ECDC 20.07.004.
B. Quasi-judicial Decisions. Type III, Type IV and appeal of Type II decisions are
quasi-judicial. Quasi-judicial decisions are made by the Hearing Examiner and/or the
city council.
C. Legislative Decision. Type V decisions are legislative. Legislative decisions are
made by the city council.
1. Planning Board. The Planning Board shall hold a public hearing and make
recommendations to the city council on Type V actions, except that the city council may
hold a public hearing itself on area-wide rezones to implement city policies, or
amendments to zoning code text, development regulations or the zoning map. The public
hearing shall be held in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.06 ECDC, RCW
36.70A.035 and all other applicable law.
2. City Council. The city council may consider the Planning Board’s
recommendation in a public hearing held in accordance with the requirements of Chapter
20.06 ECDC and RCW 36.70A.035 and all other applicable law. If the city council
desires to hold a public hearing on area-wide rezones to implement city policies, or
amendments to zoning code text, development regulations or the zoning map, it may do
so without forwarding the proposed decision to the Planning Board for a hearing.
3. Public Notice. Notice of the public hearing or public meeting shall be
provided to the public as set forth in ECDC 20.03.004.
Packet Page 157 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
5
4. Implementation. City council decision shall be by ordinance or resolution
and shall become effective on the effective date of the ordinance or resolution.
20.01.006 Legislative enactments not restricted.
Nothing in this chapter or the permit processing procedures shall limit the authority of the
city council to make changes to the city’s comprehensive plan, or the city’s development
regulations as part of the annual revision process.
20.01.007 Exemptions from development project permit application processing.
A Whenever a permit or approval in the Edmonds Community Development Code
has been designated as a Type I, II, III or IV permit, the procedures in this title shall be
followed in development project permit processing, except as provided in ECDC
20.01.003(B).
B. Pursuant RCW 36.70B.140(2), lot line or boundary adjustments, building and/or
other construction permits, or similar administrative approvals categorically exempt from
environmental review under SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW and the city’s
SEPA/environmental policy ordinance, Chapter 20.15A ECDC), or permits/approvals for
which environmental review has been completed in connection with other development
project permits, are excluded from the requirements of RCW 36.70B.060 and 36.70B.110
through 36.70B.130, which includes the following procedures:
1. Notice of application (ECDC 20.02.004) unless an open record hearing is
allowed on the development project permit decision;
2. Except as provided in RCW 36.70B.140, optional consolidated
development project permit review processing (ECDC 20.01.002(B));
3. Joint public hearings (ECDC 20.01.004);
4. Single report stating all of the decisions and recommendations made as of
the date of the report that do not require an open public record hearing (ECDC
20.06.002(C)); and
5. Notice of decision (ECDC 20.06.009).
Packet Page 158 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
6
Chapter 20.02
TYPE I – IV DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Sections:
20.02.001 Optional preapplication conference.
20.02.002 Development project permit application.
20.02.003 Submission and acceptance of application.
20.02.004 Notice of application.
20.02.005 Referral and review of development project permit applications.
20.02.001 Optional preapplication conference.
A. Prior to filing applications for development project permit Type III actions
requiring a preliminary plat or site plan review and Type IV actions, the applicant may
request a preapplication conference. The purpose of the preapplication conference is to
merely acquaint the applicant with the requirements of the Edmonds Community
Development Code. Applicant shall be responsible for verifying the accuracy of
information provided by the city at the conference.
B. The conference shall be held within 28 days of the request, upon payment of
applicable fee(s) as set forth in the city’s adopted fee resolution.
C. The director shall provide the applicant with the following during the conference:
1 A form which lists the requirements for a completed application;
2. A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the
application;
3. The references to the relevant code provisions or development standards
which may apply to approval of the application; and
4. The city’s design guidelines.
D. Neither the discussions at the conference nor the information on the form
provided by the director to the applicant under ECDC 20.02.001(C) shall bind the city in
any manner or prevent the city’s future application or enforcement of all applicable
codes, ordinances and regulations.
E. Requests for preapplication conferences for all other types of applications will be
considered on a time-available basis by the director.
20.02.002 Development project permit application.
Packet Page 159 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
7
Applications for development project permits shall be submitted on forms provided by
the director. An application shall consist of all materials required by the applicable
development regulations, and shall include the following general information as
applicable:
A. A completed development project permit application form;
B. A verified statement by the applicant that the property affected by the application
is in the exclusive ownership of the applicant, or that the applicant has submitted the
application with the consent of all owners of the affected property;
C. A property and/or legal description of the site for all applications, as required by
the applicable development regulations;
D. The applicable fee; and
E. Statement addressing all applicable standards, requirements and criteria in the
development regulations.
20.02.003 Submission and acceptance of application.
A. Determination of Completeness. Within 28 days after receiving a development
project permit application, the city shall mail or personally deliver to the applicant a
determination which states either:
1. That the application is complete; or
2. That the application is incomplete and what is necessary to make the
application complete.
B. Identification of Other Agencies with Jurisdiction. To the extent known by the
city, other agencies with jurisdiction over the project shall be identified in the
determination of completeness.
C. Additional Information. A development project permit application is complete for
the purposes of this section when it meets the submission requirements of ECDC
20.02.002 and the submission requirements of the applicable development regulations.
The determination of completeness shall be made when the application is sufficiently
complete for review, even though additional information may be required or project
modifications may be undertaken subsequently. The director’s determination of
completeness shall not preclude the director’s ability to request additional information or
studies whenever new information is required, or substantial changes are made to the
proposed project.
D. Incomplete Applications.
Packet Page 160 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
8
1. Whenever the applicant receives a determination from the city pursuant to
ECDC 20.02.003(A)(2) that the development project permit application is incomplete,
the applicant shall have 90 days to submit the necessary information. Within 14 days
after an applicant has submitted the requested additional information, the director shall
make a determination of completeness and notify the applicant in the manner provided in
subsection A of this section.
2. Whenever the applicant receives a notice that the contents of the
application, which had been previously determined under ECDC 20.02.003(A)(1) to be
complete, is insufficient, ambiguous, undecipherable, or otherwise unresponsive of the
information being sought, the applicant shall have 90 days to submit the necessary
information.
3. If the applicant does not submit the additional information requested
within the 90-day period, for the development project permit, the director shall make
findings and issue a decision, according to the Type I procedure, that the application has
lapsed for lack of information necessary to complete the review. The decision shall state
that no further action will be taken on the applications, and that if the applicant does not
make arrangements to pick up the application materials from the planning and/or public
works/engineering departments within 30 days from the date of the decision, the
application materials will be destroyed.
4. When the director determines that an application has lapsed because the
applicant has failed to submit required information within the necessary time period, the
applicant may request a refund of the application fee remaining after the city’s
determination of completeness.
E. Director’s Failure to Provide Determination of Completeness. A development
project permit application shall be deemed complete under this section if the director
does not provide a written determination to the applicant that the application is
incomplete as provided in subsection A of this section.
F Date of Acceptance of Application. Development project permit applications shall
not be officially accepted until complete. When an application is found complete, the
director shall note the date of acceptance for continued processing.
G. After acceptance, the city shall begin processing the applications. Under no
circumstances shall the city place any applications on “hold” to be processed at some
later date, even if the request for the “hold” is made by the applicant, and regardless of
the requested length of the “holding” period. This subsection does not apply to
applications placed on “hold” upon determination by the city that the application requires
additional information for a decision.
20.02.004 Notice of application.
Packet Page 161 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
9
A. Generally. A notice of application shall be provided to the public, all city
departments and agencies with jurisdiction of all Type II, III and IV development project
permit applications in accordance with Chapter 20.03 ECDC.
B. Issuance of Notice of Application.
1. Within 14 days after the city has made a determination of completeness
pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003, a notice of application shall be issued.
2. If any open record predecision hearing is required for the requested
development project permit(s), the notice of application shall be provided at least 15 days
prior to the open record hearing.
C. Contents. The notice of application shall include:
1. The date of submission of the initial application, the date of the notice of
completion and acceptance of the application, and the date of the notice of application;
2. A description of the proposed project and a list of the development project
permits requested in the application and, if applicable, a list of any studies requested
under Chapter 36.70B RCW;
3. A description of other required permits not included in the application, to
the extent known by the city at that time;
4. A description of existing environmental documents that evaluate the
proposed project, and, if not otherwise stated on the document providing notice of
application, the location where the application and any studies can be reviewed;
5. A statement setting forth: (a) the time for the public comment period,
which shall be not less than 14 nor more than 30 days following the date of notice of
application; (b) the right of any person to comment on the application, receive notice of
and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application; and
(c) any appeal rights;
6. The date, time, place and type of hearing, if a hearing has been scheduled
when the date of notice of application is issued;
7. Any other information determined appropriate by the director such as the
director’s threshold determination, if complete at the time of issuance of the notice of
application.
D. Public Comment on the Notice of Application. All public comments in response
to the notice of application must be received by the city’s development services
department by 4:00 PM on the last day of the comment period. Comments in response to
the notice of application received after the comment period has expired will not be
Packet Page 162 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
10
accepted no matter when they were mailed or postmarked. Comments shall be mailed or
personally delivered. Comments should be as specific as possible.
E. SEPA Exempt Projects. A notice of application shall not be required for
development project permits that are categorically exempt under SEPA, unless a public
comment period or an open record predecision hearing is required.
20.02.005 Referral and review of development project permit applications.
Within 10 days of accepting a complete application, the director shall transmit a copy of
the application, or appropriate parts of the application, to each affected government
agency and city department for review and comment, including those responsible for
determining compliance with state and federal requirements. The affected agencies and
city departments shall have 15 days to comment on the application. The agency or city
department is presumed to have no comments if comments are not received within the
15-day period. The director shall grant an extension of time only if the application
involves unusual circumstances. Extensions shall be for a maximum of five working
days.
Packet Page 163 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
11
Chapter 20.03
PUBLIC NOTICE
Sections:
20.03.001 Responsibility for providing public notice.
20.03.002 Public notice of application.
20.03.003 Optional public notice.
20.03.004 Notice of public hearing.
20.03.001 Responsibility for providing public notice.
A. Except where an action is initiated by the city, the applicant for a development
project permit application shall be responsible for all posting, publishing, mailing and
other notification required by the director.
1. No later than 14 days after the required date of posting, publishing
and/or mailing, the applicant shall provide to the director an affidavit attesting that each
required method of notification was carried out in conformance with the regulations in
this and other applicable chapters. For required mail notice, the applicant shall submit a
U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing containing the names and addresses of all
parties provided public notice.
2. If the affidavit and U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing is not
filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on an
application shall be postponed, if necessary, in order to allow compliance with the notice
requirements of this and other applicable chapters.
3. If the applicant fails to file the affidavit and U.S. Postal Service
Certificate of Mailing as herein required within 90 days of required date of posting,
publishing and/or mailing, the director shall make findings and issue a decision,
according to the Type I procedure, that the application has lapsed for lack of information
necessary to complete the review. The decision shall state that no further action will be
taken on the applications, and that if the applicant does not make arrangements to pick up
the application materials from the planning and/or public works/engineering departments
within 30 days from the date of the decision, the application materials will be destroyed.
B. The appellant of a development project permit decision shall be responsible for all
posting, publishing, mailing and other notification required by the director.
1. No later than 14 days after the required date of posting, publishing
and/or mailing, the appellant shall provide to the director an affidavit attesting that each
required method of notification was carried out in conformance with the regulations in
this and other applicable chapters. For required mail notice, the applicant shall submit a
U.S. Postal Service Certificate of Mailing containing the names and addresses of all
parties provided public notice.
Packet Page 164 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
12
2. When the responsibility of providing notice is on the appellant,
failure to timely or properly file affidavit of notice and certificate of mailing may be
grounds for the director to summarily dismiss the appeal.
20.03.002 Public notice of application.
Notice of application for Type II, Type III and Type IV development project permits
shall be provided by posting, publishing and mailing.
A. Posting. Posting of the property for site specific proposals shall consist of one or
more notice boards as follows:
1. A single notice board shall be placed by the applicant:
a. At the midpoint of the street fronting the site or as otherwise
directed by the director for maximum visibility;
b. Five feet inside the street property line, except when the board is
structurally attached to an existing building; provided, that no notice board shall be
placed more than five feet from the street without approval of the director;
c. So that the top of the notice board is between five to six feet above
grade; and
d. Where it is completely visible to pedestrians.
2. Additional notice boards may be required when:
a. The site does not abut a public road;
b. A large site abuts more than one public road; or
c. The director determines that additional notice boards are necessary
to provide adequate public notice.
3. Notice boards shall be:
a. Maintained in good condition by the applicant during the notice
period;
b. In place at least 30 days prior to the date of any hearing, and at
least 15 days prior to the end of any required comment period;
c. Removed within 15 days after the end of the notice period.
Packet Page 165 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
13
4. Removal of the notice board prior to the end of the notice period
shall be cause for discontinuance of the department review until the notice board is
replaced and remains in place for the specified time period.
5. Notice boards shall be constructed and installed in accordance with
specifications promulgated by the director. The format and content of the notice must be
pre-approved by the director, and contain at least the project location, description, type of
permit(s) required, comment period dates, and a location where the complete application
may be reviewed.
B. Published Notice. Notice of application shall be published in the city’s official
newspaper (or if one has not been designated, in a newspaper of general circulation
within the City). The format and content of the notice must be pre-approved by the
director, and contain at least the project location, description, type of permit(s) required,
comment period dates, and a location where the complete application may be reviewed.
C. Mailed Notice. Notice of application shall be mailed to the following: (1) owner
of the property involved if different from applicant; and (2) owners of real property, as
shown by the records of the county assessor, within 300 feet of the boundaries of the
property(ies) involved in the application. The format and content of the notice of
application must be pre-approved by the director, and contain at least the project location,
description, type of permit(s) required, comment period dates, and a location where the
complete application may be reviewed.
D. Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Permits.
1. Methods of Providing SMP Notice. Notice of the application of a
permit under the purview of the city’s shoreline master program (SMP) shall be given by
one or more of the following methods:
a. Mailing of the notice to real property owners as shown by the
records of the county assessor within 300 feet of the boundary of the property upon
which the proposed project is to be built;
b. Posting of the notice in a conspicuous manner, as determined by
the director, on the property upon which the project is to be constructed; or
c. Any other manner deemed appropriate by the director to
accomplish the objectives of reasonable notice to adjacent landowners and the public.
2. Content of SMP Notice. SMP notices shall include:
a. A statement that any person desiring to submit written comments
concerning an application, or desiring to receive notification of the final decision
concerning an application, may submit comments, or requests for the decision, to the
Packet Page 166 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
14
director within 30 days of the last date that notice is published pursuant to this
subsection;
b. A statement that any person may submit oral or written comments
at the hearing;
c. An explanation of the manner in which the public may obtain a
copy of the city’s decision on the application no later than two days after its issuance.
3. Public Comment Period. The public comment period shall be 30
days.
4. The director shall mail or otherwise deliver a copy of the decision
to each person who submits comments or a written request for the decisions.
20.03.003 Optional public notice. The director, in his or her sole discretion, may:
A. Notify the public or private groups with known interest in a proposal or type of
proposal;
B. Notify the news media;
C. Place notices in appropriate regional or neighborhood newspapers or trade
journals;
D. Publish notice in agency newsletters or send notice to agency mailing lists, either
general lists or lists for specific proposals or subject areas; and
E. Mail notice to additional neighboring property owners.
20.03.004 Notice of public hearing.
A. Applicants of Type III or Type V actions, and appellants of Type II actions shall
provide notice of public hearing by mailing, posting and publishing.
B. Content of Notice of Public Hearing for All Applications. The notice of a public
hearing required by this chapter shall contain:
1. The name and address of the applicant and the applicant’s representative;
2 A description of the subject property reasonably sufficient to inform the
public of its location, including but not limited to a vicinity location or written
description, a map or postal address, and a subdivision lot and block designation
(complete legal description not required);
3. The date, time and place of the hearing;
Packet Page 167 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
15
4. The nature of the proposed use or development;
5. A statement that all interested persons may appear and provide testimony;
6. The sections of the code that are pertinent to the hearing procedure;
7. A statement explaining when information may be examined, and when
and how written comments addressing findings required for a decision by the hearing
body may be admitted;
8. The name of a city representative to contact and the telephone number
where additional information may be obtained;
9. A statement that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence
relied upon by the applicant, and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost
and that copies will be provided at the requestor’s cost; and
10. A statement explaining that a copy of the staff report will be available for
inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing and that copies will be
provided at the requestor’s cost.
C. Mailed Notice. Mailed notice of the public hearing shall be provided as follows:
1. The notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to:
a. The applicant;
b. The owner of the subject property, if different from applicant;
c. All owners of real property, as shown by the records of the county
assessor, within 300 feet of the boundaries of the property(ies) involved in the
application; and
c. Any person who submits a public comments on an application;
2. Type III Preliminary Plat Actions. In addition to the above, requirements
for mailed notice of public hearing for preliminary plats and proposed subdivisions shall
also include the following:
a. Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat adjacent to or within one
mile of the municipal boundaries of any city or town, or which contemplates the use of
any city or town utilities shall be given to the appropriate city or town authorities;
b. Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat of a proposed subdivision
adjoining the boundaries of Snohomish County shall be given to the appropriate county
officials;
Packet Page 168 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
16
c. Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat of a proposed subdivision
located adjacent to the right-of-way of a state highway or within two miles of the
boundary of a state or municipal airport shall be given to the secretary of transportation;
d. If the owner of the real property which is proposed to be
subdivided owns another parcel or parcels of real property which lie adjacent to the real
property proposed to be subdivided, notice under RCW 58.17.090(1)(b) shall be given to
owners of real property located with 300 feet from any portion of the boundaries of the
adjacent parcels owned by the owner of the real property to be subdivided.
3. For a plat alteration or a plat vacation, notice shall be as provided in RCW
58.17.080 and 58.17.090.
4. General Procedure for Mailed Notice of Public Hearing.
a. The records of the Snohomish County assessor’s office shall be
used for determining the property owner of record. Addresses for a mailed notice
required by this code shall be obtained from the applicable county’s real property tax
records. As required under ECDC 20.03.001, the applicant shall provide a sworn
certificate of mailing to all persons entitled to notice under this Chapter.
b. All mailed public notices shall be deemed to have been received on
the next business day following the day that the notice is deposited in the mail.
D. Procedure for Posted or Published Notice of Public Hearing.
1. Posted notice of the public hearing shall comply with requirements set
forth in ECDC 20.03.002(A).
2. Notice of public hearing shall be published in the city’s official newspaper
(or if one has not been designated, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City).
The format and content of the notice must be pre-approved by the director.
E. Time and Cost of Notice of Public Hearing.
1. Notice shall be mailed, posted and first published not less than 10 or more
than 30 days prior to the hearing date. Posted notices shall be removed by the applicant
within 15 days following the public hearing.
2. All costs associated with the public notice shall be borne by the applicant
of Type III and Type IV actions, or appellant of Type II actions.
Packet Page 169 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
17
Chapter 20.04
CONSISTENCY WITH
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SEPA
Sections:
20.04.001 Determination of consistency.
20.04.002 Initial SEPA analysis.
20.04.003 Categorically exempt and planned actions.
20.04.001 Determination of consistency.
A. Purpose. Consistency between a proposed development project permit
application, applicable regulations and comprehensive plan shall be determined through
the process described in this section.
B. Consistency. During development project permit application review, the director
shall determine whether the development regulations applicable to the proposed project,
or in the absence of applicable development regulations, the city’s comprehensive plan,
address the following:
1. The type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be
allowed if the criteria for their approval have been satisfied;
2. The level of development, such as units per acre, density of residential
development in urban growth areas, or other measures of density;
3. Availability and adequacy of infrastructure and public facilities identified
in the comprehensive plan; and
4. Whether the plan or development regulations provide for funding of these
facilities as required by Chapter 36.70A RCW.
C. Project Review. Project review by the director and appropriate city staff shall
identify specific project design and conditions relating to the character of development,
such as the details of site plans, curb cuts, drainage swales, the payment of impact fees, or
other measures to mitigate a proposal’s probable significant adverse environmental
impacts. During project review, neither the director nor any other city reviewing body
may re-examine alternatives or hear appeals on decided matters which have already been
found to be consistent with development regulations and/or the comprehensive plan,
except for issues of code interpretation.
20.04.002 Initial SEPA analysis.
A. In addition to the land use consistency review, the director shall review the
development project permit application for consistency with the State Environmental
Packet Page 170 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
18
Policy Act (“SEPA”), Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC,
and the city environmental policy ordinance, Chapter 20.15A ECDC, and shall:
1. Determine whether applicable regulations require studies to adequately
analyze all of the proposed project’s specific probable adverse environmental impacts;
2. Determine whether applicable regulations require mitigation measures to
adequately address identified environmental impacts; and
3. Provide prompt and coordinated review by other government agencies and
the public on compliance with applicable environmental laws and plans, including
mitigation for specific project impacts that have not been considered and addressed at the
plan or development regulation level.
B. In its review of a development project permit application, the director shall
determine whether the requirements for environmental analysis, protection and mitigation
measures in the applicable development regulations, comprehensive plan and/or in other
applicable local, state or federal laws provide adequate analysis of and mitigation for the
specific adverse environmental impacts of the proposal.
C. If the director bases or conditions his or her approval of the development project
permit application on compliance with the requirements or mitigation measures described
in subsection A of this section, the city shall not impose additional mitigation under
SEPA during project review for the same adverse environmental impacts.
D. A comprehensive plan, development regulation or other applicable local, state or
federal law provides adequate analysis of, and mitigation for, the specific adverse
environmental impacts of a proposal when:
1. The impacts have been avoided or otherwise mitigated; or
2. The city has designated in the plan, regulation or law that certain levels of
service, land use designations, development standards or other land use conditions
allowed by Chapter 36.70A RCW are acceptable.
E. In deciding whether a specific adverse environmental impact has been addressed
by an existing city plan or development regulation, or by the regulations or laws of
another government agency, the director shall consult orally or in writing with that
agency and may expressly defer to that agency. In making this deferral, the director shall
base or condition any project approval on compliance with these other regulations.
F. Nothing in this section limits the authority of the director in reviewing or
mitigating the impacts of a proposed project to adopt or otherwise rely on environmental
analyses and requirements under other laws, as provided by Chapter 43.21C RCW.
Packet Page 171 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
19
G. The director shall also review the application under Chapter 20.15A ECDC, the
city environmental policy ordinance; provided, that such review shall be coordinated with
the underlying permit application review.
20.04.003 Categorically exempt and planned actions.
A. Categorically Exempt. Actions categorically exempt under RCW
43.21C.110(1)(a) do not require environmental review or the preparation of an
environmental impact statement. An action that is categorically exempt under the rules
adopted by the Department of Ecology (Chapter 197-11 WAC) may not be conditioned
or denied under SEPA.
B. Planned Actions.
1. A planned action does not require a threshold determination or the
preparation of an environmental impact statement under SEPA, but is subject to
environmental review and mitigation under SEPA.
2. A “planned action” means one or more types of project action that:
a. Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution
adopted by the city;
b. Have had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an
environmental impact statement prepared in conjunction with:
i. A comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under Chapter
36.70A RCW, or
ii. A fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master
planned development or a phased project;
c. Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals listed in
paragraph (2)(b) of this subsection;
d. Are located within an urban growth area, as defined in RCW
36.70A.030;
e. Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW 36.70A.200;
and
f. Are consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan adopted under
Chapter 36.70A RCW.
C. Limitations on Planned Actions. The city shall limit planned actions to certain
types of development or to specific geographical areas that are less extensive than the
Packet Page 172 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
20
jurisdictional boundaries of the city, and may limit a planned action to a time period
identified in the environmental impact statement or this title.
D. During project review, the city shall not re-examine alternatives to or hear appeals
on the items identified in ECDC 20.04.001(B), except for issues of code interpretation.
E. Project review shall be used to identify specific project design and conditions
relating to the character of development, such as the details of site plans, curb cuts,
drainage swales, the payment of impact fees, or other measures to mitigate a proposal’s
probable adverse environmental impacts.
Packet Page 173 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
21
Chapter 20.06
OPEN RECORD PUBLIC HEARINGS
Sections:
20.06.001 General.
20.06.002 Responsibility of director for hearing.
20.06.003 Conflict of interest.
20.06.004 Ex parte communications.
20.06.005 Disqualification.
20.06.006 Burden and nature of proof.
20.06.007 Order of proceedings.
20.06.008 Decision.
20.06.009 Notice of final decision - Miscellaneous.
20.06.010 Reconsideration of decision.
20.06.001 General.
A. Open record public hearing, or simply public hearing, means a hearing conducted
by a single hearing body or officer authorized to conduct such hearings, thathearings that
creates the city’s record through testimony and submission of evidence and information,
under procedures prescribed in this Chapter. A public hearing may be held prior to the
city’s decision on a development project permit to be known as an "open record
predecision hearing." A public record hearing may be held on an appeal, to be known as
an "open record appeal hearing," if no open record predecision hearing has been held on
the development project permit.
B. Open record predecision hearings on all Type III and IV development project
permit applications and open record appeal hearings on all Type II decision appeals shall
be conducted in accordance with this chapter. Public hearings conducted by the city
hearing examiner shall also be subject to the hearing examiner’s rules.
C. Unless otherwise provided, appeals of Type II decisions shall be initiated as set
forth in ECDC 20.07.004.
20.06.002 Responsibility of director for hearing.
The director shall:
A. Schedule project applications for review and public hearing;
B. Verify compliance with notice requirements;
C. Prepare the staff report on the application, which shall be a single report which
sets forth all of the decisions made on the proposal as of the date of the report, including
recommendations on development project permits in the consolidated permit process that
do not require an open record predecision hearing. The report shall also describe any
Packet Page 174 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
22
mitigation required or proposed under the city’s development regulations or SEPA
authority. If the threshold determination, other than a determination of significance, has
not been issued previously by the city, the report shall include or append this
determination.
D. Prepare the notice of decision, if required by the hearing body, and mail a copy of
the notice of decision to those entitled by this chapter to receive the decision.
20.06.003 Conflict of interest.
The hearing body shall be subject to the code of ethics, prohibitions on conflict of interest
and appearance of fairness doctrine as set forth in Chapter 42.23 RCW, and Chapter
42.36 RCW as the same now exists or may hereafter be amended.
20.06.004 Ex parte communications.
A. No member of the hearing body may communicate, directly or indirectly,
regarding any issue in a proceeding before him or her, other than to participate in
communications regarding procedural aspects necessary for maintaining an orderly
process, unless he or she provides notice and opportunity for all parties to participate.
Nothing herein shall prevent the hearing body from seeking legal advice from its legal
counsel on any issue.
B. If, before serving as the hearing body in a quasi-judicial proceeding, any member
of the hearing body receives an ex parte communication of a type that could not properly
be received while serving, the member of the hearing body, promptly after starting to
serve, shall disclose the communication as described in ECDC 20.06.004(C).
C. If a member of the hearing body receives an ex parte communication in violation
of this section, he or she shall place on the record:
1. All written communications received;
2. All written responses to the communications;
3. The substance of all oral communications received, and all responses
made; and
4. The identity of each person from whom the member received any ex parte
communication.
The hearing body shall advise all parties that these matters have been placed on the
record. Upon request made after notice of the ex parte communication, any party desiring
to rebut the communication shall be allowed to place a rebuttal statement on the record.
20.06.005 Disqualification.
Packet Page 175 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
23
A. Any member who is disqualified shall make full disclosure to the audience of the
reason(s) for the disqualification, abstain from voting on the proposal, and physically
leave the hearing.
B. If enough members of the hearing body are disqualified so that a quorum cannot
be achieved, then all members present, after stating their reasons for disqualification,
shall be requalified and deliberations shall proceed.
20.06.006 Burden and nature of proof.
A. Except for Type V actions, appeal of Type II actions and closed record appeals,
the burden of proof is on the proponent. The development project permit application must
be supported by convincing proof that it conforms to the applicable elements of the city’s
development regulations and comprehensive plan (review criteria). The proponent must
also prove that any significant adverse environmental impacts have been adequately
mitigated.
B. In an appeal of Type II actions or closed record appeal, the appellant has the
burden of proof with respect to points raised on appeal.
C. In a closed record appeal of the Architectural Design Board, its decision shall be
given substantial deference regarding decision review within its expertise and contained
in its decisions.
20.06.007 Order of proceedings.
The order of proceedings for a hearing will depend in part on the nature of the hearing.
The following shall be supplemented by administrative procedures as appropriate.
A. Before receiving testimony and other evidence on the issue, the following shall be
determined:
1. Any objections on jurisdictional grounds shall be noted on the record and
if there is objection, the hearing body may proceed or terminate the proceeding;
2. Any member disqualifications shall be determined.
B. The presiding officer may take official notice of commonly known and accepted
information, such as:
1. Ordinances, resolutions, rules, officially adopted development standards,
and state law;
2. Public records and facts judicially noticeable by law.
C. Information officially noticed need not be proved by submission of formal
evidence to be considered by the hearing body. Parties requesting official notice of any
Packet Page 176 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
24
information shall do so on the record. The hearing body, however, may take notice of
matters listed in subsection B of this section at any time. Any information given official
notice may be rebutted.
D. The hearing body may view the proposed project site or planning area with or
without notification to the parties, but shall put into the record a statement setting forth
the time, manner and circumstances of the site visit.
E. Information shall be received from the staff and from proponents and opponents.
The presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, permit persons attending the hearing
to ask questions. Unless the presiding officer specifies otherwise, approved questions will
be asked of persons submitting testimony by the presiding officer.
F. When the presiding officer has closed the public hearing portion of the hearing,
the hearing body may openly discuss the issue and may further question the staff or any
person submitting information. An opportunity to present rebuttal shall be provided if
new information is presented in the questioning. When all evidence has been presented
and all questioning and rebuttal completed, the presiding officer shall officially close the
record and end the hearing.
20.06.008 Decision.
A. Following the hearing procedure described in ECDC 20.06.007, the hearing body
shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application. If the hearing is an appeal,
the hearing body shall affirm, reverse or, with the written consent of the applicant, which
shall include a waiver of the statutory prohibition against two open record hearings,
remand the decision for additional information.
B. The hearing body’s written decision shall be issued within 10 working days after
the close of record of the hearing and within 90 days of the opening of the hearing, unless
a longer period is agreed to by the parties.
C. The city shall provide a notice of decision as provided in ECDC 20.06.009.
D. If the city is unable to issue its final decision on a development project permit
application within the time limits provided for in this section, it shall provide written
notice of this fact to the project applicant. The notice shall include a statement of reasons
why the time limits have not been met and an estimated date for issuance of the notice of
decision.
20.06.009 Notice of final decision - Miscellaneous.
A. The director shall issue a notice of final decision within 120 days of the issuance
of the determination of completeness pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003; provided, that the
time period for issuance of a notice of final decision on a preliminary plat shall be 90
days, for a final plat 30 days, and a short plat 30 days. The notice shall include the SEPA
threshold determination for the proposal and a description of any available administrative
Packet Page 177 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
25
appeals. For Type II, III and IV development project permits, the notice shall contain the
requirements set forth in ECDC 20.06.002(C) and explain that affected property owners
may request a change in property tax valuation notwithstanding any program of
revaluation.
1. The notice of final decision shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to the
applicant, to any person who submitted comments on the application or requested a copy
of the decision, and to the Snohomish County assessor.
2. Notice of the decision shall be provided to the public by any means
deemed reasonable by the director.
B. In calculating the 120-day period for issuance of the notice of final decision, or
other decision period specified in 20.06.009(A) ECDC, the following periods shall be
excluded:
1. Any period during which the applicant has been requested by the director
to correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional required information. The
period shall be calculated from the date the director notifies the applicant of the need for
additional information until the earlier of the date the director determines that the
additional information provided satisfies the request for information, or 14 days after the
date the additional information is provided to the city;
2. If the director determines that the information submitted is insufficient, the
applicant shall be informed of the particular insufficiencies and the procedures set forth
in subsection (B)(1) of this section for calculating the exclusion period shall apply;
3. Any period during which an environmental impact statement (EIS) is
being prepared pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW and Chapter 20.15A ECDC. The time
period for preparation of an EIS shall be governed by Chapter 20.15A ECDC;
4. Any period for consideration and issuance of a decision for administrative
appeals of development project permits, which shall be not more than 90 days for open
record appeals and 60 days for closed record appeals, unless a longer period is agreed to
by the director and the applicant;
5. Any extension of time mutually agreed to by the director and the applicant
in writing.
C. The time limits established in this title do not apply if a development project
permit application:
1. Requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan or a development
regulation;
Packet Page 178 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
26
2. Requires siting approval of an essential public facility as provided in
RCW 36.70A.200; or
3. Is substantially revised by the applicant, in which case the time period
shall start from the date that a determination of completeness for the revised application
is issued by the director pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003 and RCW 36.70B.070.
20.06.010 Reconsideration of decision.
A. General. Any person identified in ECDC 20.07.003 as having standing to file an
administrative appeal may request reconsideration of a decision of the hearing examiner
that issues immediately after the open record public hearing on a development project
permit application described in this chapter. (There shall be no reconsideration of a
decision of the director (staff), ADB or city council.) Reconsideration is not a condition
precedent to any appeal. Reconsideration shall be limited to:
1. error(s) of procedure;
2. error(s) of law or fact;
3. error(s) of judgment; and/or
4. the discovery of new evidence that was not known and could not in the
exercise of reasonable diligence, been discovered.
B. Time to File. A request for reconsideration, including reconsideration fee, must be
filed with the city planning director within 10 calendar days of the hearing examiner’s
written decision. Such requests shall be delivered to the director before 4:30 p.m. on the
last business day of the reconsideration period. Requests for reconsideration that are
received by mail after 4:30 p.m. on the last day of this reconsideration period will not be
accepted, no matter when such requests were sent, mailed or postmarked.
C. Computation of Time. For the purposes of computing the time for filing a request
for reconsideration, the day the hearing examiner’s decision is issued shall not be
counted. If the last day of the reconsideration is a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday
designated by RCW 1.16.050, or by a city ordinance, then the reconsideration may be
filed on the next business day.
D. Content of Request for Reconsideration. Requests for reconsideration shall be in
writing, be accompanied by the required reconsideration fee (which shall be the same as
the administrative appeal fee), and contain the following information:
1. The name, address and phone number of the requestor;
2. Identification of the application and final decision which is the subject of
the request for reconsideration;
3. Requestor’s statement of grounds for reconsideration and the facts upon
which the request is based;
Packet Page 179 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
27
4. The specific relief requested;
5. A statement that the requestor believes the contents of the request to be
true, followed by his/her signature.
E. Effect. The timely filing of a request for reconsideration shall stay the hearing
examiner’s decision until such time as the hearing examiner issues a decision on
reconsideration.
F. Notice of Request for Reconsideration. The requestor shall provide mailed notice
that a request for reconsideration has been filed to all parties of record as defined in
ECDC 20.07.003.
G. Hearing Examiner’s Action on Request. The hearing examiner shall consider the
request for reconsideration without a hearing, but may solicit written arguments from
parties of record. A decision on the request for reconsideration shall be issued within 10
business days after receipt of the request for reconsideration by the city.
1. The time period for appeal shall recommence and be the same for all
parties of record, regardless of whether a party filed a motion for reconsideration.
2. Only one request for reconsideration may be made by a party of record.
Any ground not stated in the initial motion is waived.
3. A decision on reconsideration or a matter that is remanded to the hearing
examiner by the City Council is not subject to a motion for reconsideration.
H. Limitations on Hearing Examiner’s Reconsideration. The hearing examiner shall
consider the request for reconsideration based on the administrative record compiled on
the application up to and including the date of the hearing examiner’s decision. The
hearing examiner may require or permit corrections of ministerial errors or inadvertent
omissions in the preparation of the record and the hearing examiner’s decision. The
reconsideration decision issued by the hearing examiner may modify, affirm or reverse
the hearing examiner’s decision.
I. Notice of Final Decision on Reconsideration. The director shall issue a notice of
final decision on reconsideration in the manner set forth and to the persons identified in
ECDC 20.06.009.
J. Further Appeals. If no administrative appeal is allowed of the hearing examiner’s
decision, and a request for reconsideration was timely filed, then any judicial appeal must
be filed within 21 days after issuance of the decision on reconsideration, as provided in
Chapter 36.70C RCW.
Packet Page 180 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
28
Chapter 20.07
CLOSED RECORD APPEALS
Sections:
20.07.001 Appeals of decisions.
20.07.002 Consolidated appeals.
20.07.003 Standing to initiate an administrative appeal.
20.07.004 Appeals of recommendations and decisions.
20.07.005 Procedure for closed record decision/appeal.
20.07.006 Judicial appeals.
20.07.007 Resubmission of application.
20.07.001 Appeals of decisions.
A. "Closed record appeal" means an administrative appeal on the record to the city
council, following an open record public hearing on a development project permit
application when the appeal is on the record with no new evidence or information
allowed to be submitted, except as provided in ECDC 20.07.005(B), and only appeal
argument allowed.
B. The right of appeal for all development project permit applications and Type V
land use decisions shall be as described in the matrix set forth in ECDC 20.01.003.
20.07.002 Consolidated appeals.
All appeals of development project permit application decisions, other than appeals of
determinations of significance (“DS”), and exempt permits and approvals under ECDC
20.01.007, shall be considered together in a consolidated appeal using the appeal
procedure for the highest type permit application.
20.07.003 Standing to initiate an administrative appeal.
A. Limited to Parties of Record. Only parties of record may file an administrative
appeal.
B. Definition. The term “parties of record,” for the purposes of this chapter, shall
mean:
1. The applicant;
2. Any person who testified at the open record public hearing on the
application;
3. Any person who individually submits written comments concerning the
application at the open record public hearing (or to staff if an appeal of a Type II
decision). Persons who have only signed petitions are not parties of record; and/or
Packet Page 181 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
29
4. The city of Edmonds.
20.07.004 Appeals of recommendations and decisions.
Permit Decisions or Recommendations. Appeals of a hearing body’s recommendation or
decision on a development project permit application shall be governed by the following:
A. Standing. Only parties of record have standing to appeal the hearing body’s
decision.
B. Time to File. An appeal must be filed within 10 14 working days ofafter the
issuance of the hearing body’s written decision. The appeal period shall be extended for
an additional seven days, if state or local rules adopted pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW
allow public comment on a determination of nonsignificance issued as part of the
appealable project permit decision. Appeals, including fees, must be received by the
city’s development services department by mail or by personal delivery at or before
12:004:30 PM on the last business day of the appeal period. Appeals received by mail
after 12:004:30 PM on the last day of the appeal period will not be accepted, no matter
when such appeals were mailed or postmarked.
C. Computation of Time. For the purposes of computing the time for filing an
appeal, the day the hearing body’s decision is issued shall not be counted. If the last day
of the appeal is a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday designated by RCW 1.16.050 or by a
city ordinance, or any day when city hall or the City’s Development Services Department
is closed to the public by formal executive or legislative action, then the appeal may be
filed on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, holiday or closed day., or holiday
designated by RCW 1.16.050 or by a city ordinance, then the appeal may be filed on the
next business day.
D. Content of Appeal. Appeals shall be in writing, be accompanied by the required
appeal fee as set forth in the city’s adopted fee resolution, and contain the following
information:
1. Appellant’s name, address and phone number;
2. A statement describing appellant’s standing to appeal;
3. Identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal;
4. Appellant’s statement of grounds for appeal and the facts upon which the
appeal is based with specific references to the facts in the record;
5. The specific relief sought;
6. A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the
contents to be true, followed by the appellant’s signature.
Packet Page 182 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
30
E. Effect. The timely filing of an appeal shall stay the hearing body’s decision until
such time as the appeal is concluded or withdrawn.
F. Notice of Appeal. The appellant shall provide mailed notice of the appeal to all
parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003.
20.07.005 Procedure for closed record decision/appeal.
A. Closed record appeals shall be on the record established at the open record
hearing before the hearing body/officer whose decision is appealed, which shall include
the written decision of the hearing body/officer, copies of any exhibits admitted into the
record, and official transcript, minutes or tape recording of the proceedings.
1. At his own expense, a party to the appeal may have the official tape
recording of the open record hearing transcribed; however, to be admitted into the record,
the transcription must be performed and certified by a transcriber that is pre-approved by
the City. In addition, the certified transcription must be received by the City directly
from the transcriber at least 16 working days before the date scheduled for the closed
record review. It shall be each party of record’s responsibility to obtain a copy of the
transcription from the City.
2. The director shall maintain a list of pre-approved transcribers that are
court approved; and if needed, shall coordinate with parties to the appeal so that no more
than one official transcription is admitted into the record.
B. No new testimony or other evidence will be accepted by the city council except:
(1) new information required to rebut the substance of any written or oral ex parte
communication provided during an appearance of fairness disclosure; and (2) relevant
information that, in the opinion of the city council, was improperly excluded by the
hearing body/officer.
1. Appellants who believe that information was improperly excluded must
specifically request in writing within 5 working days of the appeal deadline that the
information be made part of the record. The request shall be addressed to the city council
president, describing the information excluded, its relevance to the issues appealed, the
reason(s) that the information was excluded by the hearing body/officer, and the reason
why the hearing body/officer erred in excluding the information.
2. In determining whether the information should be admitted, the city
council president may request other parties of record to submit written arguments
rebutting the above. Non response by the city council president within 5 working days of
the initial request that the information be made part of the record shall constitute a
rejection of the same.
C. Parties to the appeal may present written arguments to the city council.
Arguments shall describe the particular errors committed by the decision maker below,
Packet Page 183 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
31
with specific references to the administrative record. The appellant shall bear the burden
to demonstrate that the decision below is clearly erroneous given the record.
D. Appellant may submit his or her written arguments 12 working days before the
date scheduled for the closed record review. Parties of record, except for the appellant,
may respond in writing to appellant’s arguments no later than 7 working days before the
closed record review. Appellant may rebut in writing to responses submitted by parties
of record no later than 4 working days before the closed record review. If the applicant is
not the appellant, applicant may submit a final surrebuttal in writing to appellant’s
rebuttal no later than 2 working days before the closed record review.
E. Written arguments, responses, rebuttal and surrebuttals must be received by the
city’s development services department by mail or personal delivery at or before
12:004:30 PM of the date due. Late submittals shall not be accepted. Submittals
received by mail after 12:004:30 PM on the last day of the appeal period will not be
accepted, no matter when such submittals were mailed or postmarked. It shall be the
responsibility of the parties involved to obtain for their own use from the city copies of
written arguments, responses, rebuttals and surrebuttals submitted.
F. All written submittals shall be typed on letter size paper (8.5 x 11), with one inch
margins, using readable font type (such as Times New Roman) and size (no smaller than
12), single sided, double spaced and without exceeding twelve pages in length, including
exhibits, if any. Exhibits that are not already in the record shall not be allowed.
G. The review shall commence with the resolution of appearance of fairness issues,
if any, followed by a presentation by the director, or the director’s designee, of the
general background of the proposed development and the issues in dispute. After the
director’s presentation, the city council may ask clarifying questions on disputed issues to
parties of record, with an opportunity for the director (or designee), appellant and/or
applicant, respectively, to rebut to the response. The city council shall not request
information outside the administrative record.
H. The city council shall determine whether the decision below by the hearing
body/officer is clearly erroneous given the evidence in the record. The city council shall
affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the hearing body/officer accordingly. Upon
written agreement by the applicant to waive the requirement for a decision within the
time periods set forth in RCW 36.70B.080, as allowed by RCW 36.70B.080(3), the city
council may remand the decision with instructions to the hearing body for additional
information.
I. Notice of Final Decision on Closed Record Appeal. The director shall issue a
notice of final decision on closed record appeal in the manner set forth and to the persons
identified in ECDC 20.06.009.
20.07.006 Judicial appeals.
Packet Page 184 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
32
The city’s final decision on an application may be appealed by a party of record with
standing to file a land use petition in Snohomish County superior court. Such petition
must be filed within 21 days after issuance of the decision, as provided in Chapter 36.70C
RCW.
20.07.007 Resubmission of application.
Any permit application or other request for approval submitted pursuant to this chapter
that is denied shall not be resubmitted or accepted by the director for reconsideration for
a period of 12 months from the date of the last action by the city on the application or
request unless, in the opinion of the director, there has been a significant change in the
application or a significant change in conditions related to the impacts of the proposed
project.
Packet Page 185 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
33
Chapter 20.08
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
Sections:
20.08.010 Authority and general provisions.
20.08.020 General provisions of development agreements.
20.08.030 Enforceability.
20.08.040 Approval procedure for development agreements.
20.08.050 Form of agreement, council approval, recordation.
20.08.060 Judicial appeal.
20.08.010 Authority and general provisions.
A. The city may consider, and enter into, a development agreement with a person
having ownership or control of real property within the city limits. The city may consider
a development agreement for real property outside of the city limit but within the urban
growth area (UGA) as part of a proposed annexation or a service agreement.
B. A development agreement shall be consistent with the applicable policies and
goals of the city of Edmonds comprehensive plan and applicable development
regulations.
20.08.020 General provisions of development agreements.
A. As applicable, the development agreement shall specify the following:
1. Project components which define and detail the permitted uses, residential
densities, nonresidential densities and intensities or building sizes;
2. The amount and payment of impact fees imposed or agreed to in
accordance with any applicable provisions of state law, any reimbursement provisions,
other financial contributions by the property owner, inspection fees, or dedications;
3. Mitigation measures, development conditions and other requirements of
Chapter 43.21C RCW;
4, Design standards such as architectural treatment, maximum heights,
setbacks, landscaping, drainage and water quality requirements and other development
features;
5. Provisions for affordable housing, if applicable;
6. Parks and common open space preservation;
7. Phasing;
Packet Page 186 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
34
8. A build-out or vesting period for applicable standards; and
9. Any other appropriate development requirement or procedure which is
based upon a city policy, rule, regulation or standard.
B. As provided in RCW 36.70B.170, the development agreement shall reserve
authority to impose new or different regulations to the extent required by a serious threat
to public health and safety.
20.08.030 Enforceability.
Unless amended or terminated, a development agreement is enforceable during its term
by a party to the agreement. A development agreement and the development standards in
the agreement govern during the term of the agreement, or for all or that part of the build-
out period specified in the agreement. The agreement may not be subject to an
amendment to a zoning ordinance or development standard or a new zoning ordinance or
development standard or regulation adopted after the effective date of the agreement. The
permit approval issued by the city after the execution of the agreement must be consistent
with the development agreement.
20.08.040 Approval procedure for development agreements.
A development agreement is a Type V development project permit application and shall
be processed in accordance with the procedures established in this title. A development
agreement shall be approved by the Edmonds city council after a public hearing.
20.08.050 Form of agreement, council approval, recordation.
A. Form. All development agreements shall be in a form provided by the city
attorney’s office. The city attorney shall approve all development agreements for form
prior to consideration by the Planning Board.
B. Term. Development agreements may be approved for a maximum period of five
years.
C. Recordation. A development agreement shall be recorded against the real property
records of the Snohomish County assessor’s office. During the term of the development
agreement, the agreement is binding on the parties and their successors, including any
area that is annexed to the city.
20.08.060 Judicial appeal.
If the development agreement relates to a project permit application, the provision of
Chapter 36.70C RCW shall apply to the appeal of the decision on the development
agreement.
Packet Page 187 of 244
{WSS729820.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 28, 2009
TO: Edmonds City Council
City of Edmonds
FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney
RE: Revisions to Title 20 Draft
Based on the City Council’s motion on May 26, the draft ordinance amending Title 20 has been
amended. The chart at Section 20.01.003 has been amended to move draft environmental impact
statements from Type II to Type III-B (Appeal to City Council). Shoreline Substantial
Development Permits, Shoreline Conditional Use Permits, Shoreline Variances, Conditional Use
Permits, General Variances and Preliminary Plats have been moved from Type III-A (no appeal
to City Council) to Type III-B.1
These changes reflect the existing code provision ECDC 20.100.020(B). Please note that
subsection 6 -- Review of approved permits -- has been removed from the Code. As you may
remember, this change was necessitated by the Washington State Supreme Court’s decision in
Nykreim v. Chelan County, and the cases which have followed prohibiting a city from reopening
an approved permit.
Attached is a copy of ECDC 20.100.010(B). This section lists the Council’s current
responsibilities for your review.
WSS:gjz
1 Mr. Orvis was correct. The chart is at paragraph A listing their types, the City Council review is shown at
paragraph C.
Packet Page 188 of 244
{BFP729875.DOC;1/00006.150243/}
2
C. Decisionmaker(s). Applications processed in accordance with subsection B of this
section which have the same procedure number, but are assigned to different hearing
bodies, shall be heard collectively by the highest decisionmaker; the city council being
the highest body, followed by the hearing examiner or Planning Board, as applicable, and
then the director. Joint public hearings with other agencies shall be processed according
to ECDC 20.01.004. Concurrent public hearings held with the design review board and
any other decisionmaker shall proceed with both decisionmakers present.
20.01.003 Development project permit application framework.
A. Decisions.
TYPE I TYPE II TYPE III-A TYPE III-B TYPE IV-A Type IV-B TYPE V
Statement of
zoning
restriction
Modification
to landscape
plans
Plat vacations
and
alterations
Essential
Public
Facilities
Final plats Site specific
/ contract
rezone
Development
agreements
Boundary
line
adjustments,
lot line
adjustment,
lot
combination
Formal
interpretation
of the text of
the ECDC by
the Director or
designated
staff
Shoreline
substantial
development,
shoreline
variance
Architectural
Design
review
Final
Planned
Residential
Development
Zoning text
amendments;
area-wide
zoning map
amendments
Permitted
uses not
requiring site
plan review
Home
occupation
permit
Preliminary
Planned
Residential
Development
General
variance,
Sign permit
variance
Comprehensive
plan
amendments
Special use
permits
Accessory
Dwelling Unit
Conditional
use
Conditional
use
Annexations
Minor
amendments
to Planned
Residential
Development
Draft
environmental
impact
statement /
SEPA
determinations
General
variances,
and sign
permit
variances,
Shoreline:
substantial
development,
conditional
use, and
variance
Development
regulations
Minor
Preliminary
Plat
amendment
Revisions to
shoreline
management
permits
Site
plan/major
amendments
to site plans
Draft
environmental
impact
statement
Master Plan
Minor design
review
Administrative
variances /
CUP’s
Preliminary
plats
Sign permits Short plat
Land clearing/
grading
Packet Page 189 of 244
Edmonds Community Development Code
within 10 working days of the posting of the
notice required by this section, the staff shall
reconsider its decision and either affirm, mod-
ify or reverse its initial decision. Notice of the
staff's decision upon reconsideration shall be
posted as is required for the original decision.
If no request for reconsideration is filed within
the time period specified in the notice of the
staff's original decision, the decision of the
planning manager shall become final.
3. Appeal of Reconsideration. Appeal
procedures shall be governed by Chapter
20.105 ECDC. ÍOrd.3329 $ 2, 2000; Ord.
3l12 $ 24,1996;Ord.2923 $ 1, 19931.
20.100.010
Chapter 20.100
HEARING EXAMINER, PLANNING
ADVISORY BOARD AND CITY
COUNCIL REVIEW
Sections:
20.100.000 Scope.
20. 100.010 Hearing examiner review.
20.100.020 Planning advisory board review.
20.100.030 City council action on
recommendations.
20.100.040 Review of approved permits.
20.100.050 Forest Practices Act moratorium.
20.100.000 Scope.
This chapter establishes review procedures
for the permit applications identified herein.
lOrd. 3112 Ë 26, 19961.
20.100.010 Hearing examiner review.
A. Scope - Recommendations. The hearing
examiner shall review and make recommenda-
tions to the city council on the following
approvals under this section:
l. Official street map changes.
2. Upon authorization of the city coun-
cil, hold hearings regarding the final assess-
ment roll of any local improvement district or
utility local improvement district in accor-
dance with the provisions of Chapter 35.44
RCW as the same exists or is hereafter
amended. The provisions of said chapter
regarding notice shall control any conflicting
provision of these ordinances.
3. Such other matters as may be referred
by the city code.
B. Scope - Decisions. The hearing exam-
iner shall review and make final decisions,
appealable to the city council, on the following
permits and approvals under this section:
1. Conditional use permits except where
this code provides for staff approval and group
homes.
2. Variances.
3. Shoreline permits.
20-97 (Revised 8/04)
Packet Page 190 of 244
20.100.020
4. Hearings on draft environmental
impact statements.
5. Preliminary plats for formal subdivi-
sions.
6. Review of approved permit, see
ECDC 20.100.040.
7. Such other matters as may be referred
by the city code.
C. Pre-Hearing. The hearing examiner shall
review all information in the project file kept
by the community services department,
including the application, staff report, environ-
mental impact statements, and so forth. The
hearing examiner shall visit the project site.
D. Public Hearing. The hearing examiner
shall hold a public hearing on each project
reviewed in the manner provided in Chapter
20.91ECDC. The community services depart-
ment shall give notice as required by that chap-
ter.
E. Findings and Conclusions. Within 10
working days following the conclusions of all
testimony and hearings, unless the applicant
agrees to an extension of time, the hearing
examiner shall make findings and conclusions,
and take action based only on information
reviewed under subsections (C) and (D) of this
section, and a visit to the project site after the
hearing, if one was made. The findings and
conclusions shall explain how the decision or
recommendation will carry out and implement
the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and other
relevant provisions of the ECDC. The exam-
iner shall send a copy of the findings and con-
clusions to the applicant, the community
services department, to any person who
requests a copy, and the city council. The find-
ings and conclusions shall contain any condi-
tions placed on an approval or permits.
F. Criteria. The hearing examiner shall
make findings, reach conclusions and take
action in accordance with the findings and cri-
teria contained in the ordinance governing the
type of application being reviewed.
G. Reconsideration. The hearing examiner
shall reconsider his decision or recommenda-
tion on any matter before him if a written
(Revised 8/04)
request is filed within 10 working days of the
date of the initial decision by any person who
attends the public hearing and signs the atten-
dance register and/or presents testimony or by
any person holding an ownership interest in a
tract of land which is the subject of such deci-
sion or recommendation. Any such reconsider-
ation request shall cite specific references to
the findings and/or the criteria contained in the
ordinances governing the type of application
being reviewed.
The hearing examiner shall promptly review
the reconsideration request and within 5 work-
ing days issue a written response, either
approving or denying the request. Ifthe recon-
sideration request is denied, the 10 working
day appeal deadline of the hearing examiner's
decision shall recommence for the remaining
number of days. If, upon the review of the
request for reconsideration, the hearing exam-
iner believes that an enor or omission is signif-
icant and may alter his or her decision or
recommendation, he or she may at his or her
discretion:
l. Amend the decision to incorporate
any omitted material and/or fact or to correct
the error; or
2. Elect to present a brief to the city
council outlining the error or omission and its
anticipated impact on his or her decision. [Ord.
3465 $ 3, 2003; Ord. 3112 S 27, 1996; Ord.
2616 $ 1, 19871.
20.100.020 Planning advisory board
review.
A. Scope. The planning advisory board
shall review, and make recommendations to
the city council, on the following permits and
approvals under this section:
1. Rezones (amendments to the official
zoning map).
2. Changes to the text of ECDC Titles
16 and 17 (zoning ordinance).
3. Changes to the comprehensive plan
text map (ECDC Title 15), excluding fees.
4. Such other matters as may be referred
by the city code.
20-98
Packet Page 191 of 244
AM-2308 3.
Swearing-in Ceremony for Sergeant Bob Barker
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:10 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Police Department swearing-in ceremony for Sergeant Bob Barker.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
A swearing-in ceremony is scheduled this evening for Police Sergeant Bob Barker.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:35 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 01:42 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:47 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 05/28/2009 01:32
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 192 of 244
AM-2304 4.
Public Hearing on Utility Rate and Water Tax Increase
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Kim Karas, Public Works
Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:30 Minutes
Department:Public Works Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on utility rate and water tax increase.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Increase the water utility rate by 7.45%; increase the stormwater utility rate by 6.82%; and
increase the water utility tax by 8.7% to pay for fire hydrant service. Rates will go into effect
begininning July 1, 2009.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
For the past 12 years, the City of Edmonds has contracted with the Financial Consulting Solutions
(FCS) Group to analyze and make recommendations for the City’s utility rates in order to provide
the necessary stormwater, water and sewer services. The rates need to be adequate so that each
utility is sufficient to meet the operational and capital expenses. Based on an analysis performed
last year, FCS Group and City staff have determined that utility rate increases are necessary and
need to be implemented in 2009, (see Exhibits 1 & 2). In addition, a recent State Supreme Court
ruling requires that the cost for providing fire hydrants is not a water utility function, but instead is
a general government function. Therefore, part of the proposal is a utility tax revenue increase on
water service to pay for fire hydrants.
Factors that necessitate a rate increase for water are:
• Alderwood Water's wholesale rate increases as a result of improvements to the City of
Everett’s regional water treatment facility along with the replacement of regional water
transmission lines (see Exhibit 3);
• The on-going need to replace aging and leaky City of Edmonds’ water mains;
• A gradual decrease in water consumption due to conservation mandates which, in turn, reduces
water revenues. (See Exhibit 4); and
• Lack of low interest loan and grant programs through the Public Works Trust Fund and State
Revolving Fund.
Packet Page 193 of 244
The overall recommended revenue increase for water rates for the remainder of 2009 is 16.8%.
Separating the cost for fire hydrants reduces the recommended rate increase to 7.45%.
Correspondingly, the utility tax rate for water will need to be increased from 10% to 18.7%. This
additional tax revenue will be collected in the General Fund to pay for the cost of fire hydrants
previously paid for the by the City’s water utility. The cost of City fire hydrants is estimated at
approximately 8.0% of the water utility capital and operating expenses.
The primary factors necessitating a stormwater rate increase of 6.82% for the remainder of 2009
are:
• The need for additional capital projects to replace aging or inadequate infrastructure and to
address flooding damage from recent severe storm events;
• On-going compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act as regulated by the State Stormwater
NPDES permit; and
• Lack of funding for Federal and State low interest loan and grant programs.
Historically, water rate increases have been below the 3.2% general rate of inflation (see Exhibit
5). The wholesale rates charged by the Alderwood Water District have increased on the average by
4.25%, for the last 15 years. With the proposed rate increases, the City of Edmonds utility rates
will be 20% below the average municipal utility rates as surveyed by the Association of
Washington Cities (see Exhibit 6). In addition, the City’s stormwater rates rank substantially
below other local jurisdictions in our region. (See Exhibit 7) For a typical single family
household, the combined utility rate of water, sewer and stormwater is estimated at $63.40 per
month compared with the statewide average of $76.62 per month.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1
Link: Exhibit 2
Link: Exhibit 3
Link: Exhibit 4
Link: Exhibit 5
Link: Exhibit 6
Link: Exhibit 7
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:19 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 01:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:30 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kim
Karas
Started On: 05/27/2009 02:54
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 194 of 244
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 195 of 244
Packet Page 196 of 244
Packet Page 197 of 244
Packet Page 198 of 244
Packet Page 199 of 244
Packet Page 200 of 244
Packet Page 201 of 244
Packet Page 202 of 244
AM-2294 5.
Ordinance Reducing Use of Single Use Plastic Checkout Bags in Edmonds
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/02/2009
Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council
Submitted For:Councilmember Strom Peterson Time:45 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on Ordinance reducing use of single use plastic checkout bags in Edmonds.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Previous Council Action
During the April 7, 2009 Council Meeting, the Council considered the possibility of banning
plastic bags in retail, commercial outlets in Edmonds and reviewed a Resolution submitted by
Councilmember Strom Peterson for discussion.
Following review and discussion, Councilmember Peterson moved, seconded by Council
President Wilson, to adopt the resolution.
Council President Wilson moved, seconded by Councilmember Wambolt, to amend the
"Resolved" paragraph of the resolution to read: Now therefore be it resolved, that the City Council
of the City of Edmonds directs staff to prepare an ordinance banning the use of single-use plastic
checkout bags and encouraging the use of reusable shopping bags for future Council and
community consideration." The amendment passed unanimously.
The vote on the main motion as amended passed unanimously.
The Council referred this issue to the Community/Development Services Committee for review.
Attachment 1: 4/7/2009 Council Meeting Minutes.
The Community/Development Services Committee met on April 14, 2009. During that meeting,
Bio Park from the City Attorney’s office was present for the discussion. Bio informed the
Committee that the City Attorney’s office is conducting research on how other cities have
approached adopting and implementing a ban on plastic bags. The intent is to develop options for
Edmonds to consider based on this research, including examples of “unintended consequences”
that other jurisdictions may have experienced. Options discussed by the Committee to consider
would be a broad ban on plastic bags as well as a narrowly tailored ban targeting such businesses
as groceries and retailers. Pros and cons for each potential ban option should be presented and
discussed.
Packet Page 203 of 244
ACTION: City Attorney’s office to develop options for a ban on plastic bags and present these for
discussion by the Committee at its next meeting in May.
Attachment 2: 4/14/2009 CS/DS Committee Meeting Minutes
Council President Wilson put this item on the April 28 Council agenda to give the public a chance
to comment on the ordinance regarding plastic bags that is coming before the Council in May,
2009.
Attachment 3: 4/28/2009 Council Minutes
During the CS/DS Committee Meeting of 5/12/09, a discussion on a proposal to ban single use
plastic checkout bags in Edmonds ensued.
Bio Park from the City Attorney’s Office reviewed three draft ordinances that were prepared as
options for the City Council to consider, based on approaches taken in other cities – primarily in
California. The “Retail Draft” ordinance would apply to all retail establishments, requiring that a
merchant supply recyclable paper or reusable bags instead of single-use plastic bags. The
“Groceries Draft” would apply the ban to all food stores (i.e. not all retailers), while the “Hybrid
Draft” would apply the ban to large supermarkets with other retailers only needing to provide a
paper/recyclable option for customers. All three draft ordinances would have some common
features, such as an “operative date” when the ordinance went into effect (to allow inventory
reduction and adjustment by merchants to the ban) and a standard of enforcement via the City’s
code enforcement procedures. Each ordinance would also authorize the Mayor to grant
exemptions during the first year of the ban in order to allow the Council to consider permanent
exemptions, if merited.
ACTION: The Committee voted to forward the three draft ordinances to the full Council for
discussion as part of the May 19th agenda.
Attachment 4: 5/12/2009 CS/DS Committee Meeting Minutes
Attachment 5: Memorandum from Bio F. Park
Attachment 6: Draft Ordinance - Retail
Attachment 7: Draft Ordinance - Groceries
Attachment 8: Draft Ordinance - Hybrid
During the May 19, 2009 Council meeting the Council held a work session regarding an ordinance
banning single-use plastic checkout bags in Edmonds. The Council reviewed the 3 Draft
Ordinances prepared by Bio Park. Councilmember Bernheim advised he proposed an ordinance
that would institute a fee on plastic bags as
an alternative to a ban. Mayor Pro Tem Wilson suggested that option be included in the Council
packet for the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem D.J. Wilson advised that the next steps were to
hold a Public Hearing on June 2, 2009 regarding the options and the SEPA process.
Attachment 9: 5/19/09 Council Minutes.
Attachment 10: Bernheim Ordinance
Narrative
The Council will hold a public hearing on this issue.
Fiscal Impact
Packet Page 204 of 244
Attachments
Link: Attach 1 CM 4-7-2009
Link: Attach 2 CS-DS Min 4-14-2009
Link: Attach 3 CM 4-28-09
Link: Attach 4 CS-DS Min 5-12-09
Link: Attach 5 Bio F. Park Memo
Link: Attach 6 Draft Ord -Retail
Link: Attach 7 Draft Ord - Groceries
Link: Attach 8 Draft Ord - Hybrid
Link: Attach 9 CM 5-19-2009
Link: Attach 10 BERNHEIM ORD BAG FEE
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 11:30 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/28/2009 12:32 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/28/2009 01:19 PM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 05/20/2009 02:15
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/28/2009
Packet Page 205 of 244
Packet Page 206 of 244
Packet Page 207 of 244
Packet Page 208 of 244
Packet Page 209 of 244
Packet Page 210 of 244
Packet Page 211 of 244
Packet Page 212 of 244
Packet Page 213 of 244
Packet Page 214 of 244
Packet Page 215 of 244
Packet Page 216 of 244
Packet Page 217 of 244
Packet Page 218 of 244
Packet Page 219 of 244
Packet Page 220 of 244
Packet Page 221 of 244
Packet Page 222 of 244
Packet Page 223 of 244
Packet Page 224 of 244
Packet Page 225 of 244
Packet Page 226 of 244
Packet Page 227 of 244
Packet Page 228 of 244
Packet Page 229 of 244
Packet Page 230 of 244
Packet Page 231 of 244
Packet Page 232 of 244
Packet Page 233 of 244
Packet Page 234 of 244
Packet Page 235 of 244
Packet Page 236 of 244
Packet Page 237 of 244
Packet Page 238 of 244
Packet Page 239 of 244
Packet Page 240 of 244
Packet Page 241 of 244
Packet Page 242 of 244
Packet Page 243 of 244
Packet Page 244 of 244