The URL can be used to link to this page

2012.02.14 CC Committee Meetings Agenda Packet AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds FEBRUARY 14, 2012 6:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 1. (60 Minutes) Convene in executive session regarding labor negotiations per RCW 42.30.140(4)(b), a real estate matter per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b), and potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110.(1)(i). (Police Training Room) 2. (5 Minutes) Reconvene in open session and adjourn to Committee Meetings. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS The City Council Committee meetings are work sessions for the City Council and staff only, the meetings are open to the public but are not public hearings. The Committees will meet in separate meeting rooms as indicated below. 3.PLANNING, PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Meeting Room: Council Chambers A. (15 Minutes) AM-4557 Discussion on urban farming. File No. AMD20120002 B. (5 Minutes) AM-4556 Authorization to advertise the SR 99 International District Enhancements Project. C. (5 Minutes) AM-4554 Report on final construction costs for 226th St. SW Walkway and acceptance of project. D. (5 Minutes) AM-4550 Report on final construction costs for Dayton St. Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) Storm Pipe Rehabilitation Project and acceptance of the project. E. (5 Minutes)Report on final construction costs for the BNSF Double Track and Underground Utilities Packet Page 1 of 121 E. (5 Minutes) AM-4540 Report on final construction costs for the BNSF Double Track and Underground Utilities Project and acceptance of project. F. (5 Minutes) AM-4541 Report on final construction costs for the Main Street Watermain Project and acceptance of project. G. (5 Minutes) AM-4537 Report on final construction costs for the Shell Valley Emergency Access Road Project and acceptance of project. H. (5 Minutes) AM-4559 Authorization for acceptance and recording of a new sanitary sewer easement and abandonment of an existing sanitary sewer easement at 620 Sunset Avenue. I. (5 Minutes) AM-4539 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with SAIC to provide consulting services for the Dayton Street & SR104 Drainage Alternatives Study. J. (5 Minutes) AM-4551 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with BHC Consultants to provide services to prepare the 2012-13 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. K. (5 Minutes) AM-4543 Quarterly Public Works Project Report L. (5 Minutes) AM-4542 Update to the City's General Facilities Charges for utilities by City staff and the FCS Group. M. (5 Minutes) AM-4527 Authorization to approve easements for the Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Project. N. (5 Minutes) AM-4531 Authorization to advertise a Request for Bids for construction services for the Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements. O. (5 Minutes) AM-4532 Authorization to advertise, a Request for Bids, for construction services for the 76th Avenue W Waterline Installation Project. P. (5 Minutes) AM-4533 Authorization to advertise, a Request for Bids, for construction services for the 2012 Waterline Replacement Project. Q. (10 Minutes)Public Comments (3-minute limit per person) 4.PUBLIC SAFETY AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Meeting Room: Police Training Room A. (15 Minutes) AM-4565 Discussion regarding Human Resources temporary staffing proposal. B. (90 Minutes) AM-4555 Citizens' Commission on Compensation of Elected Officials C. (10 Minutes)Public Comments (3-minute limit per person) Packet Page 2 of 121 AM-4557 Item #: 3. A. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:15 Minutes Submitted By:Jen Machuga Department:Planning Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Discussion on urban farming. File No. AMD20120002 Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The City Attorney recommends that the City Council consider a different regulatory scheme whereby urban farms would be permitted outright (not required to obtain any use permit), but would still be required to comply with certain reasonable regulations that would not have the effect of prohibiting the activity. Previous Council Action None. Narrative It has recently been brought to staff's attention that there may be a conflict between the city's home occupation regulations related to urban farming (ECDC 20.20.010.C) and state law (RCW 36.71.090). The City Attorney has prepared a memorandum discussing this potential conflict, which is included as Attachment 1. The city's current home occupation regulations of ECDC 20.20 as well as RCW 36.71.090 are also included for reference. Attachments are as follows: 1. Memo from City Attorney dated 2/9/12 2. Home Occupation Regulations (ECDC 20.20) 3. Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 36.71.090 Attachments Attachment 1: Memo from City Attorney dated 2/9/12 Attachment 2: Home Occupation Regulations (ECDC 20.20) Attachment 3: Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 36.71.090 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 01:34 PM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 02:37 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:25 PM Form Started By: Jen Machuga Started On: 02/08/2012 03:17 PM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 3 of 121 Packet Page 4 of 121 Date: February 9, 2012 To: Edmonds City Council Copy: Rob Chave Jen Machuga From: Jeff Taraday Re: Urban Farming Regulations We recommend that the City Council review its urban farming regulations and consider revising them in light of a possible conflict between the City’s regulations and state law. RCW 36.71.090 states as follows: It shall be lawful for any farmer, gardener, or other person, without license, to sell, deliver, or peddle any fruits, vegetables, berries, eggs, or any farm produce or edibles raised, gathered, produced, or manufactured by such person and no city or town shall pass or enforce any ordinance prohibiting the sale by or requiring license from the producers and manufacturers of farm produce and edibles as defined in this section RCW 36.71.090 (emphasis added). While this section is codified in the chapter on peddlers licenses, giving us the ability to argue that the license referred to in the section is a peddlers license, the second clause (note the “any ordinance” language), may have broader applicability that would reach land use permits. Unfortunately, case law does not clarify the reach of this statute. The City’s home occupation regulations expressly address urban farms. The applicable parts of ECDC 20.20.010 are set forth below: 20.20.010 Home occupation. A home occupation may be conducted as a permitted secondary use in any residential zone of the city subject to the following regulations: Attachment 1Packet Page 5 of 121 A. A home occupation shall be a permitted use if it: 1. Is carried on exclusively by a family member residing in the dwelling unit; and 2. Is conducted entirely within the structures on the site, without any significant outdoor activity; and 3. Uses no heavy equipment, power tools or power sources not common to a residence; and 4. Has no pickup or delivery by business related commercial vehicles which exceeds 20,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (except for the U.S. mail and standard UPS/FedEx sized delivery vehicles); and 5. Creates no noise, dust, glare, vibration, odor, smoke or other impact adverse to a residential area beyond that normally associated with residential use; and 6. Does not include any employees outside of the family members residing at the residence, including but not limited to persons working at or visiting the subject property; and 7. Complies with all performance criteria established pursuant to ECDC 17.60.010; and 8. Does not park or store more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit pursuant to ECDC 17.50.100. B. A home occupation which does not meet one or more of the requirements of subsection (A) of this section may be approved as a staff approval (Type II decision) if the home occupation will not harm the character of the surrounding neighborhood as evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The temporary and permanent keeping of animals associated with a home occupation must comply with all provisions of Chapter 5.05 ECC, Animal Control, and ECDC Title 16; and 2. The home occupation will not include storage, display of goods, building materials and/or the operation of building machinery, commercial vehicles or other tools, unless it meets all of the following criteria: a. Is wholly enclosed within a structure or building; b. Does not emit noise, odor or heat; and c. Does not create glare or emit light from the site in violation of the Packet Page 6 of 121 city’s performance criteria; and 3. Does not create a condition which injures or endangers the comfort, or pose health or safety threats to persons on abutting properties or streets; and 4. Does not include visits to the site from more than one nonresident employee per day; and 5. Does not include visits from customers in excess of one vehicle per hour; and 6. Does not include visits from customers between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and 7. If visits to the site are to be made by either an off‐site employee or customer, on‐site parking shall be provided for at least three vehicles; and 8. No parking or storage is provided for more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit pursuant to ECDC 17.50.100. C. Urban Farming. 1. “Urban farming” is defined as the display or sale of edible farm products or fresh produce grown on‐site. 2. A home occupation for urban farming not meeting the criteria of subsection (A) of this section may be approved as a Type II decision if it meets all of the criteria contained in subsection (B) of this section, except that: a. Subsection (B)(5) of this section does not apply. An applicant for a home occupation for the sale of on‐site farm products or produce shall be required to submit a site plan showing how any visitors to the site can be accommodated without creating a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjoining properties. b. The general prohibition of the display of goods and requiring the business to be wholly enclosed within a building in subsection (B)(2) of this section do not apply to the display or sale of edible farm products or produce, so long as the display is removed during nonoperating hours. * * * ECDC 20.20.010 (emphasis added). These provisions differentiate between home occupancies that are allowed outright without any requirement to obtain a permit Packet Page 7 of 121 (subsection A), and home occupancies that are required to obtain a home occupancy permit (subsection B) following a process similar to a conditional use permit. An urban farm could theoretically fall into either category. Our concern about a possible conflict with state law arises with respect to urban farms that would not meet the requirements of subsection A. While the applicability of the statute to land use permits isn’t entirely clear, one can argue that requiring a home occupancy permit of an urban farm could conflict with the spirit, if not the letter, of RCW 36.71.090. We recommend that the City Council consider a different regulatory scheme whereby urban farms would be permitted outright (not required to obtain any use permit), but would still be required to comply with certain reasonable regulations that would not have the effect of prohibiting the activity. 4817‐1390‐1582, v. 1 Packet Page 8 of 121 Chapter 20.20 HOME OCCUPATIONS Sections: 20.20.000 Purpose. 20.20.010 Home occupation. 20.20.020 General regulation. 20.20.030 Permit. 20.20.000 Purpose. A home occupation is generally an economic enterprise operated within a dwelling unit, or buildings accessory to the dwelling unit which are incidental and secondary to the residential use of the dwelling unit, including the use of the dwelling unit as a business address in the phone directory or as a post office mailing address. The purpose of this chapter is to allow residents to carry on home occupations on their property while guaranteeing neighboring residents freedom from excessive noise, excessive traffic, nuisance, fire hazard and other possible potential negative impacts from the maintenance of a commercial use within a residential neighborhood. The purpose of this chapter is to permit two types of home use occupations while prohibiting other commercial uses in residential neighborhoods. Commercial enterprises employing only the residents of a structure which are operated entirely within the structure are intended to be permitted activities. The city’s community sustainability element of the comprehensive plan encourages local business and reductions in the city’s overall greenhouse gas emissions, so this chapter seeks to encourage home-based work and business activities while preserving the character of residentially zoned neighborhoods by limiting the number of customers and employees permitted to visit the home occupation. [Ord. 3840 § 1, 2011]. 20.20.010 Home occupation. A home occupation may be conducted as a permitted secondary use in any residential zone of the city subject to the following regulations: A. A home occupation shall be a permitted use if it: 1. Is carried on exclusively by a family member residing in the dwelling unit; and 2. Is conducted entirely within the structures on the site, without any significant outdoor activity; and 3. Uses no heavy equipment, power tools or power sources not common to a residence; and 4. Has no pickup or delivery by business related commercial vehicles which exceeds 20,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (except for the U.S. mail and standard UPS/FedEx sized delivery vehicles); and 5. Creates no noise, dust, glare, vibration, odor, smoke or other impact adverse to a residential area beyond that normally associated with residential use; and 6. Does not include any employees outside of the family members residing at the residence, including but not limited to persons working at or visiting the subject property; and Page 1 of 4Chapter 20.20 HOME OCCUPATIONS 2/8/2012http://www.mrsc.org/mc/edmonds/edmonds20/edmonds2020.html Attachment 2 Packet Page 9 of 121 7. Complies with all performance criteria established pursuant to ECDC 17.60.010; and 8. Does not park or store more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit pursuant to ECDC 17.50.100. B. A home occupation which does not meet one or more of the requirements of subsection (A) of this section may be approved as a staff approval (Type II decision) if the home occupation will not harm the character of the surrounding neighborhood as evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The temporary and permanent keeping of animals associated with a home occupation must comply with all provisions of Chapter 5.05 ECC, Animal Control, and ECDC Title 16; and 2. The home occupation will not include storage, display of goods, building materials and/or the operation of building machinery, commercial vehicles or other tools, unless it meets all of the following criteria: a. Is wholly enclosed within a structure or building; b. Does not emit noise, odor or heat; and c. Does not create glare or emit light from the site in violation of the city’s performance criteria; and 3. Does not create a condition which injures or endangers the comfort, or pose health or safety threats to persons on abutting properties or streets; and 4. Does not include visits to the site from more than one nonresident employee per day; and 5. Does not include visits from customers in excess of one vehicle per hour; and 6. Does not include visits from customers between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; and 7. If visits to the site are to be made by either an off-site employee or customer, on-site parking shall be provided for at least three vehicles; and 8. No parking or storage is provided for more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit pursuant to ECDC 17.50.100. C. Urban Farming. 1. “Urban farming” is defined as the display or sale of edible farm products or fresh produce grown on-site. 2. A home occupation for urban farming not meeting the criteria of subsection (A) of this section may be approved as a Type II decision if it meets all of the criteria contained in subsection (B) of this section, except that: a. Subsection (B)(5) of this section does not apply. An applicant for a home occupation for the sale of on-site farm products or produce shall be required Page 2 of 4Chapter 20.20 HOME OCCUPATIONS 2/8/2012http://www.mrsc.org/mc/edmonds/edmonds20/edmonds2020.html Packet Page 10 of 121 to submit a site plan showing how any visitors to the site can be accommodated without creating a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjoining properties. b. The general prohibition of the display of goods and requiring the business to be wholly enclosed within a building in subsection (B)(2) of this section do not apply to the display or sale of edible farm products or produce, so long as the display is removed during nonoperating hours. D. Artist Studio. 1. An “artist studio” is defined as the display or sale of hand-made products (artwork) that are produced on-site. Items or artwork created off-site are not included in this definition. 2. A home occupation for an artist studio not meeting the criteria of subsection (A) of this section may be permitted as a Type II decision if it meets all of the criteria contained in subsection (B) of this section, except that: a. Subsection (B)(5) of this section does not apply. An applicant for a home occupation for an artist studio shall be required to submit a site plan showing how any visitors to the site can be accommodated without creating a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjoining properties. b. The display or sale of hand-made artwork shall remain completely enclosed within a building pursuant to subsection (A)(2) of this section. [Ord. 3840 § 1, 2011]. 20.20.020 General regulation. A. Sale or Display of Goods. No goods shall be sold or rendered on the premises except instructional materials pertinent to the home occupation (e.g., music books), or as described above in ECDC 20.20.010(C) for urban farming or ECDC 20.20.010(D) for artist studio. Display or storage of goods outside the premises or in the window thereof is prohibited, except related to an urban farming display located entirely on the subject property. Such farm or produce display shall be removed during the hours it is not in operation. B. Signs. A sign is permitted in conjunction with a home occupation approval and shall not exceed four square feet in size. The sign area shall be calculated as part of, not in addition to, the total sign area permitted on the site. A building permit and a Type II conditional use permit are required for any proposed commercial signage in a residential zone. C. Reasons for Denial. A home occupation is a special exception to the zoning ordinance and the applicant has the burden of persuasion that he/she comes within the stated purposes and criteria of this chapter. The following are among common reasons for denial but are not intended to be exclusive: 1. The on-street or on-site parking of trucks or other types of equipment associated with the home occupation; 2. The littered, unkempt and otherwise poorly maintained condition of the dwelling site; Page 3 of 4Chapter 20.20 HOME OCCUPATIONS 2/8/2012http://www.mrsc.org/mc/edmonds/edmonds20/edmonds2020.html Packet Page 11 of 121 3. Visits to the site are made by more than one vehicle per hour, such as a contractor or business operation that includes multiple employees meeting at the site to collect materials or equipment that will be used at another location; 4. Noncompliance with the criteria of this chapter or conditions of approval or other provisions of city ordinance; and/or 5. The proposal cannot be conditioned in order to meet the criteria and findings of the chapter. [Ord. 3840 § 1, 2011]. 20.20.030 Permit. All permits for home occupations are personal to the applicant and shall not be transferred or otherwise assigned to any other person. The permit will automatically expire when the applicant named on the permit application moves from the site. The home occupation shall also automatically expire if the permittee fails to maintain a valid business license or the business license is suspended or revoked. The home occupation shall not be transferred to any site other than that described on the application form. [Ord. 3840 § 1, 2011]. This page of the Edmonds City Code is current through Ord. 3868, passed December 20, 2011. Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the Edmonds City. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. City Website: http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us (http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us) City Telephone: (425) 771-0245 Code Publishing Company (http://www.codepublishing.com/) Page 4 of 4Chapter 20.20 HOME OCCUPATIONS 2/8/2012http://www.mrsc.org/mc/edmonds/edmonds20/edmonds2020.html Packet Page 12 of 121 Inside the Legislature Find Your Legislator Visiting the Legislature Agendas, Schedules and Calendars Bill Information Laws and Agency Rules Legislative Committees Legislative Agencies Legislative Information Center E-mail Notifications (Listserv) Civic Education History of the State Legislature Outside the Legislature Congress - the Other Washington TVW Washington Courts OFM Fiscal Note Website RCWs > Title 36 > Chapter 36.71 > Section 36.71.090 36.71.080 << 36.71.090 >> End of Chapter RCW 36.71.090 Farmers, gardeners, etc., peddling own produce exempt from license requirements — Exception — Valid direct retail endorsement. (1) It shall be lawful for any farmer, gardener, or other person, without license, to sell, deliver, or peddle any fruits, vegetables, berries, eggs, or any farm produce or edibles raised, gathered, produced, or manufactured by such person and no city or town shall pass or enforce any ordinance prohibiting the sale by or requiring license from the producers and manufacturers of farm produce and edibles as defined in this section. However, nothing in this section authorizes any person to sell, deliver, or peddle, without license, in any city or town, any dairy product, meat, poultry, eel, fish, mollusk, or shellfish where a license is required to engage legally in such activity in such city or town. (2) It is lawful for an individual in possession of a valid direct retail endorsement, as established in RCW 77.65.510, to sell, deliver, or peddle any legally harvested retail-eligible species, as that term is defined in RCW 77.08.010, that is caught, harvested, or collected under rule of the department of fish and wildlife by such a person at a temporary food service establishment, as that term is defined in RCW 69.06.045, and no city, town, or county may pass or enforce an ordinance prohibiting the sale by or requiring additional licenses or permits from the holder of the valid direct retail endorsement. However, this subsection does not prohibit a city, town, or county from inspecting an individual displaying a direct retail endorsement to verify that the person is in compliance with state board of health and local rules for food service operations. [2003 c 387 § 5; 2002 c 301 § 9; 1984 c 25 § 4; 1963 c 4 §36.71.090 . Prior: 1917 c 45 § 1; 1897 c 62 § 1; RRS § 8343.] Notes: Finding -- Effective date -- 2002 c 301: See notes following RCW 77.65.510. Legislature Home | Senate | House of Representatives | Contact Us | Search | Help Page 1 of 1RCW 36.71.090: Farmers, gardeners, etc., peddling own produce exempt from license requirements — Exception — Valid direct retail endor... 2/8/2012http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.71.090 Attachment 3 Packet Page 13 of 121 AM-4556 Item #: 3. B. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted By:Frances Chapin Department:Parks and Recreation Committee:Community/Development Services Type:Information Information Subject Title Authorization to advertise the SR 99 International District Enhancements Project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action March 4, 2008, Council authorized staff to call for bids for the decorative illumination elements. October 21, 2008, Council authorized the purchase of light poles and electrical components for the project. Authorization was approved to advertise for bids for construction on August 17, 2009, but due to subsequent delays the project was not advertised. June 14, 2011 an update was presented to inform Council about additional federal funding and the status of the expanded project. Narrative The request for authorization to advertise the SR 99 International District Enhancements Project will be on an upcoming Consent Agenda. The scope of the original project was to create streetscape enhancements including replacement of existing cobra head light poles with new decorative poles, signage, pedestrian lighting, and a sculptural element on a resurfaced median island at 76th Avenue West. The goals of the enhancement project are to create a visual gateway for the International District, enhance district identity and pedestrian safety, and encourage economic development on SR 99. Originally scheduled for construction in 2009-10, the project was delayed and the City successfully applied for funding to increase the number of decorative lighting elements in the scope of work for the project area. Budgeted in the 129 fund, the project was originally awarded Federal Transportation Enhancement funding of $316,000 in 2006. In 2008 the City received an additional $57,000 grant to bring the total to $373,000. In late 2010 the City was awarded $289,000 in Federal Transportation Enhancement funding to bring the total grant funded budget to $662,000. Design work for the total expanded project is now complete and WSDOT approval to go to bid is currently under review. Construction is anticipated for late spring and summer. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2012 08:28 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/10/2012 09:17 AM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2012 09:29 AM Form Started By: Frances Chapin Started On: 02/08/2012 Final Approval Date: 02/10/2012 Packet Page 14 of 121 AM-4554 Item #: 3. C. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Jaime Hawkins Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Report on final construction costs for 226th St. SW Walkway and acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward item to the consent agenda for Council acceptance at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On June 14, 2011, the CS/DS committee recommended Council award a contract to Northend Excavating to construct the 226th SW Walkway Project. On June 21, 2011, City Council awarded a contract to Northend Excavating to construct the 226th St. SW Walkway Project. Narrative The 226th St. SW Walkway project is complete. The project constructed 350 feet of new sidewalk and upgraded curb ramps at the intersection of SR104 and 226th St to comply with ADA standards. Construction was funded by a federal grant ($138,516) from the Highway Safety Improvement Program and the 412 Stormwater Utility Fund. The contract award amount was $73,840 and Council approved a management reserve of $18,500. There were two approved change orders for additional hot mix asphalt paving, tree removal and modifications for the pedestrian push buttons at the traffic signal at SR104 and 226th St. The total cost for the change orders was $6,789 and the final construction cost paid to the contractor was $79,286. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/09/2012 02:16 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/09/2012 03:18 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:25 PM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 03:43 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:46 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/08/2012 11:51 AM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 15 of 121 AM-4550 Item #: 3. D. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Report on final construction costs for Dayton St. Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) Storm Pipe Rehabilitation Project and acceptance of the project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On August 9, 2011, the CS/DS committee recommended Council award a contract to Michels Corporation for the Dayton St. CIPP Storm Pipe Rehabilitation Project. On August 15, 2011, the Council awarded a contract to Michels Corporation for the Dayton St. CIPP Storm Pipe Rehabilitation Project. Narrative The Dayton St. CIPP Storm Pipe Rehabilitation Project is complete. The project installed 207 feet of cured in place pipe (CIPP) liner in the existing 24-inch diameter stormwater pipe in Dayton St. between the east side of the BNSF railroad tracks and Admiral Way. The original contract amount for the project was $64,020. The project had one change order in the amount of $5,290, which raised the project total to $69,310. This change order was needed to allow the contractor to clean large debris that was found in the storm drain pipe that was located downstream of the project site. After completion of the project, the quantities and work tasks were measured so that the estimated contract amount reflected the actual work performed. The final contractor costs including change order#1 was $65,180. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/06/2012 03:51 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/07/2012 08:36 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2012 11:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/07/2012 12:36 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2012 01:19 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/06/2012 10:55 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2012 Packet Page 16 of 121 Packet Page 17 of 121 AM-4540 Item #: 3. E. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Pam Lemcke Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the BNSF Double Track and Underground Utilities Project and acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On March 16, 2010 Council awarded a contract to Interwest Construction, Inc. to complete the BNSF Double Track and Underground Utilities Project. Narrative In April 2008, the City was informed by BNSF that the double tracking project along the Edmonds waterfront would require improvements to several City utility pipelines that cross beneath the railroad tracks. In response to BNSF’s notice, the City awarded a contract in the amount of $1,059,341 to Interwest Construction, Inc. in March 2010 to upgrade existing utility crossings at Dayton and Main Streets. The contract with ICI had five work schedules and three were completed during the summer of 2010. The completed work included new water and storm crossings at Dayton St, a new side sewer north of Main Street and the installation of a new waterline in James Street between Sunset Ave and Railroad Street. The Contractor wasn’t able to complete the new storm and water crossings at Main Street because of a buried timber support system beneath the railroad tracks. The Contractor’s bore machine was unable to bore through the large timber system and work was initially suspended in July 2010 while the City negotiated with BNSF to find an option for completing the work. The City made the determination in August 2010 to terminate the remaining work at Main Street because of the conflicts encountered beneath BNSF’s railroad tracks. The project is complete and the final construction costs paid to ICI Construction was $880,289. There were three approved change orders that resulted in a deductive adjustment because of the terminated work at Main Street. The final payment was approximately $179,000 below the original contract amount with ICI Construction. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/08/2012 03:34 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/08/2012 04:06 PM Packet Page 18 of 121 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 10:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 12:30 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 01:35 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/02/2012 04:13 PM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 19 of 121 AM-4541 Item #: 3. F. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Pam Lemcke Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the Main Street Watermain Project and acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On November 1, 2011, Council approved an emergency contract with Strider Construction, Inc. to complete the water utility connections to the water crossing beneath the railroad tracks at Main Street. Narrative In October 2011, the City was approached by BNSF regarding their intention to complete the utility work beneath BNSF's railroad tracks that was not finished by the City in 2010. BNSF identified a funding source to complete the City’s utility work in conjunction with track repairs that were being made at Main St. BNSF agreed to complete the water and stormwater utility crossings beneath the railroad tracks. BNSF did not include the connections from the new water utility crossing to the City’s existing water system, since this work was outside of BNSF’s right of way. The City approved an emergency contract with Strider Construction in November 2011 to complete the water connections to the City system during the BNSF project. The emergency contract was for $95,537 and the Council authorized a $35,000 management reserve. The project is complete and the final construction costs paid to Strider Construction was $107,043. The final payment included one change order for $11,506 which covered the removal and disposal of additional pavement related to a thicker pavement section and a buried obstruction, field adjustments to the planned stormwater work, and revised placement of the watermain due to buried un-marked conduits and duct bank. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/08/2012 03:48 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/08/2012 04:06 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 10:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 12:29 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 01:35 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/02/2012 04:32 PM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 20 of 121 Packet Page 21 of 121 AM-4537 Item #: 3. G. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Ed Sibrel Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Report on final construction costs for the Shell Valley Emergency Access Road Project and acceptance of project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On July 12, 2011, the CS/DS committee recommended Council award a contract to Kamins Construction to construct the Shell Valley Emergency Access Road Project. On July 19, 2011, Council awarded a contract to Kamins Construction to construct the Shell Valley Emergency Access Road Project. Narrative On August 17, 2011, Kamins Construction was given the notice to proceed with construction, stipulating 55 working days in the contract, and that work must be completed by November 2, 2011. During the course of the contract, Change Order #1 was signed, adding two extra days and $6,586.37 to the contract to address unanticipated changed conditions. Substantial completion of the work was granted November 4, 2011, and physical completion on December 29, 2011. The construction contractor completed the work on time and approximately 8% under budget, at $284,926.19 (including Change Order #1). Construction was funded by grants from the State Transportation Department and Department of Ecology. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/08/2012 05:09 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/08/2012 05:18 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 10:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 12:31 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 01:35 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/02/2012 11:32 AM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 22 of 121 AM-4559 Item #: 3. H. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Jeanie McConnell Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization for acceptance and recording of a new sanitary sewer easement and abandonment of an existing sanitary sewer easement at 620 Sunset Avenue. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action None. Narrative A public sanitary sewer main crosses through the property of 620 Sunset Avenue in a north/south direction. The owners of the subject property, Michael and Kathleen Echelbarger, have a building permit application under review by the City for an addition to the existing single-family residence. The proposed addition will be constructed over the top of the existing sanitary sewer main. As a condition of development, Mr. and Mrs. Echelbarger are required to reconstruct that portion of the sanitary sewer main located on the subject property and provide the City with a new easement that will allow full access to the sewer main and associated appurtenances. The City Attorney has reviewed the easement and approves as to form. Attachments Attachment 1 - Existing easement to be abandoned (AFN 946726) Attachment 2 - New Easement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/09/2012 02:51 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/09/2012 03:18 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:25 PM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 03:43 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:46 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/09/2012 10:10 AM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 23 of 121 Packet Page 24 of 121 Packet Page 25 of 121 Packet Page 26 of 121 P a c k e t P a g e 2 7 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 2 8 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 2 9 o f 1 2 1 AM-4539 Item #: 3. I. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Jerry Shuster Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with SAIC to provide consulting services for the Dayton Street & SR104 Drainage Alternatives Study. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On October 18, 2011, Council authorized Staff to advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the Dayton Street & SR104 Drainage Alternatives Study. Narrative The intersection of Dayton Street and SR104 frequently floods. The flooding at this intersection is also closely linked to the condition of the Edmonds Marsh. Visual evidence indicates that Shellabarger Creek is somewhat restricted from flowing into the Marsh on the west side of SR104 due to the extensive growth of freshwater vegetation in the channel. The extensive vegetation in the Marsh is also a factor in past flooding of the Harbor Square Development owned by the Port of Edmonds (110 -190 Dayton St) and the privately owned “Antique Mall complex” (190 Sunset Ave.(SR104)). Both of these properties are built on the historic location of the greater Edmonds Marsh. This project will primarily focus on improving the Dayton Street stormwater system to reduce the frequency of flooding in and around this intersection. The results will also be a first step in an overall waterfront area drainage plan. Statements of qualifications were received from nine firms in response to the RFQ. Per the purchasing policy a review panel comprised of Rob English, PE, City Engineer, Jerry Shuster, PE, Stormwater Engineering Program Manager, and Mike DeLilla, PE, Senior Utility Engineer reviewed and compared the submittals. Three firms were selected to go to the interview phase of the selection process: SAIC (formerly RW Beck), GHD, and Tetra Tech. Interviews were held on January 9th for all three firms with the same review panel members plus Phil Williams, Public Works and Utilities Director. Based on their qualifications and experience SAIC was selected for this project. SAIC scored very high in two areas of the evaluation: Project Approach and Qualifications/Experience of the Project Manager. SAIC’s approach to the project was very well thought out and included involving other stakeholders in the area such as the Washington Department of Transportation. Their Project Manager has experience in the area, working on basin plans in Edmonds in the past. One of their subconsultants, Herrera, has experience working for Sound Transit and Washington State Ferries’ on environmental permitting issues in the Edmonds waterfront area. Packet Page 30 of 121 environmental permitting issues in the Edmonds waterfront area. Fiscal Impact This project is closely related to another project in the Capital Improvement Plan, Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study. People for Puget Sound (PFPS), received a $100,000 grant from the Salmon Recovery Board to investigate the feasibility of day lighting Willow Creek from the Marsh into Puget Sound (it currently is connected by an underground pipe). The PFPS project will also look at the amount of salmon rearing habitat created in the Marsh from the planned day lighting. The City committed $50,000 in grant matching funds from the Stormwater Utility Fund for the PFPS project. Both projects overlap in the need for survey information in the Marsh and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the Shellabarger and Willow Creeks that flows into the Marsh. These stream flows and the subsequent effect on water levels in the Marsh (gathered from the survey) affect both the storm drainage system in the area and the available fish habitat. Consequently, the matching money will be added to the original project budget for the Dayton St. & SR 104 project for surveying and modeling that can be used by both projects. A draft scope & budget for this project is attached. This project is funded from the Stormwater Utility. Attachments Attachment 1-Draft Scope of Work Attachment 2-Draft Budget Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/08/2012 03:50 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/08/2012 04:06 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 10:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 12:30 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 01:35 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/02/2012 02:09 PM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 31 of 121 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 4 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 5 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 6 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 7 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 8 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 3 9 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 4 0 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 4 1 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 4 2 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 4 3 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 4 4 o f 1 2 1 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Da y t o n S t r e e t S R 1 0 4 A l t e r n a t i v e s S t u d y DR A F T SA I C - B u d g e t S u m m a r y 2- 7 - 1 2 SE E & I G e n e r a l T r a v e l S u b c o n t r a c t o r La b o r R e v e n u e Ex p e n s e s Ex p e n s e s Ch a r g e s 10 0 0 1 P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 10 0 0 1 . 1 P r o j e c t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 5 4 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 8 2 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 8 2 $ 7 , 6 8 2 . 0 0 10 0 0 1 . 2 P r o j e c t M e e t i n g s 1 8 . 0 0 $ 3 , 8 8 7 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 8 7 $ 3 , 9 8 7 . 0 0 10 0 0 1 . 3 Q u a l i t y A s s u r a n c e / Q u a l i t y C o n t r o l 3 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 5 4 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 5 4 $ 7 , 5 5 4 . 0 0 20 0 0 2 D a t a R e v i e w 28 . 0 0 $ 4 , 1 5 6 . 5 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 4 9 . 4 0 $ 5 , 6 0 6 $ 5 , 6 0 5 . 9 0 30 0 0 3 F i e l d S u r v e y 30 0 0 3 . 1 F i e l d S u r v e y - D a y t o n S t r e e t 2 . 5 0 $ 4 1 2 . 5 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 1 7 5 . 1 6 $ 9 , 5 8 8 $ 9 , 5 8 7 . 6 6 30 0 0 3 . 2 F i e l d S u r v e y - M a r s h / W i l l o w C r 5 . 5 0 8 2 4 . 5 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 3 3 4 . 8 4 $ 1 9 , 1 5 9 $ 1 9 , 1 5 9 . 3 4 40 0 0 4 Sy s t e m I n v e s t i g a t i o n a n d T V - I n s p e c t i o n 10 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 5 9 . 5 0 $0 . 0 0 $5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 6 7 . 4 5 $ 3 , 5 7 7 $3,576.95 50 0 0 5 H y d r o l o g i c a n d H y d r a u l i c A n a l y s i s 50 0 0 5 . 1 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s 50 0 0 5 . 1 2 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s - D a y t o n S t 92 . 5 0 $ 1 2 , 9 1 4 . 5 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 . 6 8 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 9 3 1 $12,931.18 50 0 0 5 . 1 3 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s - M a r s h / W i l l o w C r 1 8 5 . 5 0 $ 2 5 , 8 0 7 . 5 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 3 2 $ 0 . 0 0 $25,841 $ 2 5 , 8 4 0 . 8 2 50 0 0 5 . 2 A l t e r n a t i v e S o l u t i o n s 18 5 . 5 0 $ 2 6 , 7 4 8 . 5 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 2 6 , 7 9 9 $26,798.50 60 0 0 6 E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e v i e w 8. 0 0 $ 1 , 5 8 4 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 8 6 8 . 0 7 $ 7 , 4 5 2 $7,452.07 70 0 0 7 A l t e r n a t i v e A n a l s y s i s 70 0 0 7 . 1 S c r e e n i n g A l t e r n a t i v e s 76 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 7 4 5 . 5 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 7 4 6 $12,745.50 70 0 0 7 . 2 A l t e r n a t i v e A n a l s y s i s 64 . 0 0 $ 8 , 1 6 3 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 8 5 . 5 3 $ 1 3 , 9 9 9 $13,998.53 80 0 0 8 St a k e h o l d e r / C o u n c i l M e e t i n g s 29 . 0 0 $5 , 4 2 5 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $2 0 0 . 0 0 $7 , 0 2 7 . 5 9 $1 2 , 6 5 3 $12,652.59 90 0 0 9 A l t e r n a t i v e A n a l y s i s M e m o r a n d u m 90 0 0 9 . 1 D r a f t 76 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 3 6 9 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 3 6 9 $ 1 0 , 3 6 9 . 0 0 90 0 0 9 . 2 F i n a l 16 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 6 9 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 6 9 $2,269.00 10 0 0 0 10 Ma n a g e m e n t R e s e r v e 57 . 0 0 $9 , 9 2 6 . 5 0 $0 . 0 0 $7 3 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $1 0 , 0 0 0 $9,999.50 GR A N D T O T A L S 93 7 . 5 0 $1 4 1 , 9 2 9 $0 $5 7 3 $4 9 , 7 0 8 $1 4 7 , 2 0 9 $45,000 $192,210Total Charges Ch a r g e s Ph a s e No . Ta s k No . P h a s e / T a s k SE E & I L a b o r Hr s Da y t o n S t r e e t Pr o j e c t PF P S W i l l o w Project Ci t y o f E d m o n d s D a y t o n S t r e e t S R 1 0 4 S t o r m D r a i n a g e A l t e r n a t i v e s S t u d y Pr o j e c t B u d g e t T a s k S u m m a r y 2 / 8 / 2 0 1 2 Pa c k e t Pa g e 45 of 12 1 AM-4551 Item #: 3. J. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with BHC Consultants to provide services to prepare the 2012-13 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On September 20, 2011, Council authorized Staff to advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to update the City’s Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Narrative The City’s current Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan was written in 2006 and needs to be updated. The update will review, evaluate, and address the following elements of the City’s Sanitary Sewer System: (1) Planning data and demand; (2) Sanitary Sewer System Analysis; (3) System Reliability; (4) Updates to the existing Sewer Model; (5) Regulatory Compliance with the Washington State Department of Ecology; (6) Operations and Maintenance Program; (7) Capital Facilities Plan; (8) Financial Program. The comprehensive plan will conform to the applicable sections of Chapter 173-240 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) and as further detailed in the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) document “Criteria for Sewage Works Design.” In addition, the information from the 2010 City of Edmonds Inflow/Infiltration Study shall be incorporated. The update is also necessary for the City to comply with Washington State Growth Management Act. Statements of qualifications from four firms were received by the City’s Senior Utility Engineer in response to the RFQ. Per the purchasing policy, a review panel comprising of Rob English, City Engineer, Jerry Shuster, City Stormwater Program Manager, and Michele De Lilla, Senior Utility engineer reviewed and compared the submittals. BHC Consultants was selected based on their qualifications and experience in preparing Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plans. BHC has successfully completed similar work for the neighboring Alderwood Water and Wastewater District, City of Kirkland, and City of Mountlake Terrace. They are also in process of preparing Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plans for the City of Lynnwood, City of Everson, and City of Enumclaw. In their Packet Page 46 of 121 Sewer Comprehensive Plans for the City of Lynnwood, City of Everson, and City of Enumclaw. In their SOQ, BHC proposed to partner with the FCS Group; a firm that Edmonds has worked with for many years on utility rate studies. The total estimated cost for this project is $196,000. This total includes funds for the WWTP portion of the project coming from: • Ronald WWD • Olympic View WSD • City of Mountlake Terrace This is because the WWTP is a facility that is shared between the City and the entities listed above. Per the Agreement for Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Transport Services dated May 17, 1988, the costs for the WWTP are shared as allocated in the agreement. Those matching funds are estimated to be approximately $22,000. Attachments Attachment 1-BHC Agreement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/09/2012 03:46 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/09/2012 03:56 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:58 PM Mayor Dave Earling 02/10/2012 09:17 AM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2012 09:29 AM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/06/2012 11:19 AM Final Approval Date: 02/10/2012 Packet Page 47 of 121 P a c k e t P a g e 4 8 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 4 9 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 0 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 1 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 2 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 3 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 4 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 5 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 6 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 7 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 8 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 5 9 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 0 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 1 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 2 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 3 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 4 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 5 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 6 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 7 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 6 8 o f 1 2 1 AM-4543 Item #: 3. K. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Robert English Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Information Information Subject Title Quarterly Public Works Project Report Recommendation from Mayor and Staff The report is being provided for review and discussion. Previous Council Action None. Narrative Attached is a quarterly report for capital improvement projects managed by the Public Works Department. The fourth quarter report for 2011 contains information on the estimated project budget, 2011 budget, change orders, funding sources and schedule. Attachments Attachment 1 - Project Report Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/08/2012 04:54 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/08/2012 05:18 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 10:33 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/09/2012 12:27 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 01:35 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/02/2012 05:05 PM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 69 of 121 PU B L I C W O R K S D E P A R T M E N T / E N G I N E E R I N G D I V I S I O N P R O J E C T S Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m St a t u s Ci t y o r To t a l 20 1 1 Ch a n g e Ci t y Co m p l e t e * * A c t i v e Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n Ty p e Co n s u l t a n t Bu d g e t Bu d g e t Or d e r s G r a n t s F u n d ( s ) # A d v e r t i s e C o n s t P h a s e Comments Ed m o n d s G e n e r a l F a c i l i t i e s Ch a r g e S t u d y Al l F C S $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $2 5 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 _ _ S t u d y GF C r e p o r t c o m p l e t e . Pr e l i m i n a r y F i n d i n g s a n d G F C m a x r a t e p r e s e n t e d t o c o u n c i l No v 2 0 1 1 . Co u n c i l m e e t i n g t o d i s c u s s t i m e l i n e t o i n c r e a s e r a t e s sc h e d u l e d f o r F e b 2 0 1 2 . Pu b l i c W o r k s Y a r d W a t e r Q u a l i t y Up g r a d e ( V e h i c l e W a s h S t a t i o n & Co v e r f o r M a t e r i a l P i l e s ) Fa c i l i t i e s C o n s u l t a n t $ 5 5 , 0 0 0 $5 5 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 M a r - 1 2 S e p - 1 2 D e s A l t e r n a t i v e s S t u d y f o r V e h i c l e W a s h S t a t i o n C o m p l e t e d Wa d e J a m e s T h e a t e r R o o f R e p a i r s Pr o j e c t Fa c i l i t i e s C i t y $1 2 , 0 0 0 $1 2 , 0 0 0 $0 _ 1 1 6 S m a l l W o r k s Au g - 1 1 C l o s e d N o c h a n g e o r d e r s w e r e n e e d e d . P a r t o f t h i s p r o j e c t w a s r o o f i n g m a i n t e n a n c e , p a i d a t p r e v a i l i n g wa g e p e r s t a t u t e . V a l u e = $ 5 , 2 0 4 . 6 0 . R e p l a c e m e n t o f t h e l o b b y r o o f m a t e r i a l w a s q u o t e d a s a s m a l l wo r k s p r o j e c t . V a l u e = $ 8 , 4 3 4 . 8 5 . T h e A f f i d a v i t o f P r e v a i l i n g W a g e s P a i d w a s r e c e i v e d i n l a t e Oc t o b e r a n d t h e f i n a l 5 % o f t h e l o b b y r o o f r e p l a c e m e n t w a s p a i d 76 t h A v e n u e W e s t / 7 5 t h P l a c e We s t W a l k w a y Pa r k s G r a y & Os b o r n e $3 , 0 2 4 , 0 6 5 $0 $7 2 5 , 8 0 2 _ 1 2 5 A p r - 0 9 N o v - 1 0 C l - O u t Co n s t r u c t i o n i s c o m p l e t e . Co n t r a c t o r h a s s u b m i t t e d a $ 9 5 1 , 9 2 4 c l a i m f o r e q u i t a b l e ad j u s t m e n t . S t a f f i s i n t h e p r o c e s s o f r e v i e w i n g t h e c l a i m do c u m e n t a t i o n . Ch a n g e O r d e r 1 : $ 5 9 , 8 9 5 ; C h a n g e O r d e r 2 : $ 2 8 , 5 8 4 ; C h a n g e Or d e r 3 : $ 2 2 , 1 1 7 ; C h a n g e O r d e r 4 : $ 1 0 , 0 9 6 ; C h a n g e O r d e r 5 : $1 5 , 7 9 9 ; C h a n g e O r d e r 6 : $ 1 3 1 , 5 4 7 ; C h a n g e O r d e r 7: $ 2 4 5 , 2 9 7 ; C h a n g e O r d e r 8 : $ 1 6 7 , 7 3 9 ; C h a n g e O r d e r # 9 : $2 5 , 1 0 9 ; C h a n g e O r d e r # 1 0 : $ 1 9 , 6 1 8 . Da y t o n S t r e e t P l a z a Pa r k s B a r k e r $ 1 6 0 , 6 0 5 $1 3 5 , 5 0 0 _ _ 1 3 2 t b d t b d O N H O L D De s i g n a t 1 0 0 % . In t e r u r b a n T r a i l Pa r k s K P F F $ 2 , 4 3 0 , 0 0 0 $1 , 3 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 1 3 9 , 6 2 4 $ 1 , 3 2 7 , 0 0 0 1 3 2 M a y - 1 1 A p r - 1 2 C o n S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l g r a n t s w e r e s e c u r e d f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n ph a s e , i n t h e t o t a l a m o u n t o f $ 1 , 3 2 7 , 0 0 0 . C o n s t r u c t i o n i s i n p r o g r e s s , s c h e d u l e d f o r c o m p l e t i o n i n A p r i l . T h e c o n t r a c t i s 1 2 0 w o r k i n g d a y s . C h a n g e o r d e r 1 : $ 3 7 , 7 5 7 C h a n g e o r d e r 2 : $ 2 , 2 4 0 C h a n g e o r d e r 3 : $ 4 1 , 0 0 3 C h a n g e o r d e r 4 : $ 1 3 , 4 1 2 C h a n g e o r d e r 5 : $ 7 , 2 5 7 C h a n g e o r d e r 6 : $ 4 , 6 8 0 C h a n g e o r d e r 7 : $ 3 3 , 2 7 5 Al d e r / D e l l w o o d / B e a c h P l / 2 4 4 t h Se w e r R e p l a c e m e n t Se w e r C i t y $ 3 8 0 , 0 0 0 A l d e r $1 7 0 , 0 0 0 B e a c h $2 2 0 , 0 0 0 D e l l w o o d $3 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 2 4 t h $1 , 0 9 0 , 0 0 0 T o t a l $3 5 , 0 0 0 A l d e r $1 5 , 0 0 0 B e a c h $2 0 , 0 0 0 D e l l w o o d $3 0 , 0 0 0 2 2 4 t h $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 T o t a l _ _ 4 1 2 A p r - 1 2 D e c - 1 2 D e s De s i g n 5 0 % C o m p l e t e BN S F C r o s s i n g s Se w e r W a t e r St o r m KP F F $ 1 , 2 1 7 , 9 8 1 $8 8 , 0 0 0 ( $ 1 1 3 , 2 7 7 ) _ 4 1 2 F e b - 1 0 A u g - 1 0 C l - o u t C o n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e . C h a n g e O r d e r # 1 - $ 0 C h a n g e O r d e r # 2 - ( $ 1 1 6 , 5 6 7 ) C h a n g e O r d e r # 3 - $ 3 , 2 9 0 Li f t S t a t i o n 2 Se w e r B H C $9 3 4 , 1 3 6 $1 , 1 7 8 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 J u n - 1 1 M a r - 1 2 C o n C o n s t r u c t i o n 9 0 % c o m p l e t e . Li f t S t a t i o n s 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 , 1 0 , 1 1 , 1 2 , 14 & 1 5 Se w e r C H S $ 3 , 9 1 8 , 0 0 0 $2 , 4 1 7 , 9 7 3 _ _ 4 1 2 M a r - 1 2 A p r - 1 3 D e s D e s i g n 9 9 % c o m p l e t e . 12 t h S t o r m St o r m G r a y & Os b o r n e ; Un i v e r s a l $1 1 8 , 4 6 8 $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 5 6 8 _ 4 1 2 J u l - 1 1 S e p - 1 1 C l - O u t C o n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e . C o u n c i l a c c e p t e d p r o j e c t i n D e c 2 0 1 1 . Sc h e d u l e Pr o j e c t B u d g e t 2/ 9 / 2 0 1 2 P A G E 1 Pa c k e t Pa g e 70 of 12 1 PU B L I C W O R K S D E P A R T M E N T / E N G I N E E R I N G D I V I S I O N P R O J E C T S Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m St a t u s Ci t y o r To t a l 20 1 1 Ch a n g e Ci t y Co m p l e t e * * A c t i v e Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n Ty p e Co n s u l t a n t Bu d g e t Bu d g e t Or d e r s G r a n t s F u n d ( s ) # A d v e r t i s e C o n s t P h a s e Comments Sc h e d u l e Pr o j e c t B u d g e t Ci t y - W i d e D r a i n a g e R e p l a c e m e n t Pr o j e c t s : W i l l o w C r e e k S t o r m An c h o r S t r a p s St o r m M o f f i t N i c h o l $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $2 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 _ _ O N H O L D Pr i o r d e s i g n s u n d e r r e v i e w a n d u p d a t e . Da y t o n S t r e e t S t o r m R e h a b St o r m C i t y $1 1 0 , 0 0 0 $0 _ _ 4 1 2 J u n - 1 1 O c t - 1 1 C l - o u t C o n s t r u c t i o n C o m p l e t e . Ed m o n d s M a r s h - S h e l l a b a r g e r / Wi l l o w C r e e k F l o o d P l a i n De l i n e a t i o n S t u d y St o r m C o n s u l t a n t $ 2 3 9 , 0 0 0 $2 3 9 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 _ _ S t u d y P r o j e c t c a n c e l l e d . A l l o c a t e d b u d g e t w i l l b e u s e d t o w a r d s ac q u i s i t i o n o f K a r l s t e n p r o p e r t y a p p r o v e d b y C o u n c i l . La k e B a l l i n g e r A s s o c i a t e d P r o j e c t s St o r m C i t y $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 _ O c t - 1 2 P r e D e s i g n u n d e r w a y v i a I L A w i t h M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e f o r en g i n e e r i n g d e s i g n / e n v i r o n m e n t a l p e r m i t t i n g f o r l a k e o u t l e t mo d i f i c a t i o n s ( v e g e t a t i o n r e m o v a l a n d c u l v e r t r e p l a c e m e n t s o n Ni l e G o l f C o u r s e ) . $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 s p e n t o n d e t e n t i o n v a u l t c o n s t u c t e d f o r I n t e r u r b a n Tr a i l Lo w I m p a c t D e v e l o p m e n t De m o n s t r a t i o n P r o j e c t St o r m C o n s u l t a n t $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 T B D T B D P r e S c o p e u n d e r d e v e l o p m e n t T o b e c o m b i n e d w i t h M a i n S t . L i g h t i n g P r o j e c t F u n d s t o b e r o l l e d o v e r t o 2 0 1 2 . SW E d m o n d s - 1 0 5 t h / 1 0 6 t h A v e W St o r m I m p r o v e m e n t s St o r m C i t y $4 4 7 , 0 0 0 $1 0 6 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 M a r - 1 3 S e p - 1 3 D e s De s i g n 7 0 % C o m p l e t e . Re v i e w d r a i n a g e c o n d i t i o n s d u r i n g F a l l 2 0 1 1 , W i n t e r 20 1 1 / 2 0 1 2 t o e v a l u a t e p r o j e c t p r i o r t o f i n a l i z i n g d e s i g n . Ta l b o t R d / P e r r i n v i l l e C r e e k Dr a i n a g e I m p r o v e m e n t & H a b i t a t En h a n c e m e n t - P h a s e I I St o r m H e r r e r a $ 5 2 2 , 0 0 0 $5 2 2 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 M a r - 1 2 O c t - 1 2 D e s D e s i g n a t 6 0 % R e v i s e d m i t i g a t i o n p r o p o s a l i n c l u d e s s t r e a m b a n k s t a b i l i z a t i o n in u p p e r p a r t o f P e r r i n v i l l e C r e e k . A l l p e r m i t s h a v e b e e n o b t a i n e d C o n s t r u c t i o n m o v e d t o 2 0 1 2 W i l l g o o u t f o r b i d e a r l y 2 Q 2 0 1 2 Te r r a c e C r e e k C u l v e r t Re p l a c e m e n t a t T a l b o t R d . St o r m C H S En g i n e e r s $5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $0 _ _ 4 1 2 _ J a n - 0 9 C l - O u t Co n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e ; w o r k i n g w i t h c o n t r a c t o r t o c l o s e - o u t pr o j e c t . 22 6 t h S t . S W W a l k w a y St r e e t P A C E $2 0 4 , 2 0 0 $1 3 9 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 7 8 9 $ 1 8 5 , 0 0 0 1 1 2 & 4 1 2 M a y - 1 1 N o v - 1 1 C l - O u t F e d e r a l g r a n t w a s s e c u r e d f o r $ 1 8 5 , 0 0 0 ( d e s i g n a n d co n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e ) . C o n s t r u c t i o n i s c o m p l e t e . C h a n g e o r d e r 1 : $ 3 , 9 3 0 C h a n g e o r d e r 2 : $ 2 , 8 5 9 22 8 t h S t . S W C o r r i d o r S a f e t y Im p r o v e m e n t s St r e e t P e r t e e t $ 5 , 1 0 2 , 0 0 0 $3 1 0 , 0 0 0 _ $ 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 1 1 2 T B D T B D D e s D e s i g n a t 6 0 % . A F e d e r a l g r a n t ( S T P ) w a s s e c u r e d f o r d e s i g n a n d R O W ac q u i s t i o n p h a s e s ( D e s i g n : $ 3 5 5 , 0 0 0 ; R O W : $ 2 6 5 , 0 0 0 ) . F u n d i n g c u r r e n t l y i s n ' t s e c u r e d f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e . 76 t h A v e . W @ 2 1 2 t h S t . S W In t e r s e c t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t s St r e e t D a v e E v a n s $ 2 , 7 6 0 , 0 0 0 $0 _ $ 9 4 0 , 3 9 7 1 1 2 T B D T B D P r e A F e d e r a l g r a n t ( C M A Q ) w a s s e c u r e d f o r t h e d e s i g n a n d r i g h t - of - w a y a c q u i s i t i o n p h a s e s ( D e s i g n : $ 2 9 4 , 1 0 0 ; R O W : $ 6 4 6 , 2 9 7 ) . Th e R O W g r a n t f u n d i n g r e q u e s t e d w a s $ 8 4 3 , 3 7 5 . D a v e E v a n s h a s b e e n s e l e c t e d a s t h e c o n s u l t a n t t o c o m p l e t e th e d e s i g n a n d R O W p h a s e ( c o n t r a c t c u r r e n t l y b e i n g d r a f t e d ) . F u n d i n g c u r r e n t l y i s n ' t s e c u r e d f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e . Da y t o n S t r e e t O v e r l a y St r e e t C i t y $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 1 1 2 / 4 1 2 J u n - 1 1 O c t - 1 1 C o n Co n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e . 2/ 9 / 2 0 1 2 P A G E 2 Pa c k e t Pa g e 71 of 12 1 PU B L I C W O R K S D E P A R T M E N T / E N G I N E E R I N G D I V I S I O N P R O J E C T S Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m St a t u s Ci t y o r To t a l 20 1 1 Ch a n g e Ci t y Co m p l e t e * * A c t i v e Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n Ty p e Co n s u l t a n t Bu d g e t Bu d g e t Or d e r s G r a n t s F u n d ( s ) # A d v e r t i s e C o n s t P h a s e Comments Sc h e d u l e Pr o j e c t B u d g e t Fi v e C o r n e r s R o u n d a b o u t ( 2 1 2 t h St . S W @ 8 4 t h A v . W ) St r e e t D a v e E v a n s $ 2 , 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 $1 5 0 , 0 0 0 _ $ 4 6 3 , 0 0 0 1 1 2 T B D T B D D e s D e s i g n a t 2 0 % A F e d e r a l g r a n t ( C M A Q ) w a s s e c u r e d f o r t h e d e s i g n a n d r i g h t - of - w a y a c q u i s i t i o n p h a s e s ( D e s i g n : $ 2 9 0 , 0 0 0 ; R O W : $ 1 7 3 , 0 0 0 ) . F u n d i n g c u r r e n t l y i s n ' t s e c u r e d f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e . Ma i n S t r e e t P e d e s t r i a n L i g h t i n g fr o m 5 t h A v e t o 6 t h A v e St r e e t P a r a m e t r i x $ 9 7 4 , 0 0 0 $1 1 5 , 0 0 0 _ $ 7 2 5 , 0 0 0 1 1 2 & 4 1 2 J u n - 1 2 D e c - 1 2 D e s D e s i g n a t 6 0 % c o m p l e t e . A F e d e r a l g r a n t w a s s e c u r e d f o r d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n ( t o t a l am o u n t : $ 7 2 5 , 0 0 0 ) . Re s i d e n t i a l N e i g h b o r h o o d T r a f f i c Ca l m i n g St r e e t C i t y $5 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 1 1 2 _ F e b - 1 2 C o n $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 p r o g r a m m e d f o r 2 0 1 1 f r o m t h e G e n e r a l F u n d , al l o w i n g f o r t h e s t a r t o f t h e t r a f f i c c a l m i n g p r o g r a m . S p e e d s t u d i e s w e r e c o n d u c t e d a l o n g ( 2 3 ) s t r e t c h e s ( a t lo c a t i o n s w h e r e c i t i z e n s h a v e a d d r e s s e d s p e e d i n g c o n c e r n s ) . Ea c h s t r e t c h w a s t h e n r a n k e d b a s e d o n a s e t o f c r i e r i a s t h a t we r e e v a l u a t e d . Sh e l l V a l l e y E m e r g e n c y A c c e s s Ro a d St r e e t P e r t e e t $ 6 1 0 , 0 0 0 $4 8 6 , 5 0 0 $ 5 , 8 0 0 $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 1 2 / 4 1 2 J u n - 1 1 N o v - 1 1 C l - O u t Co n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e , o n t i m e a n d u n d e r b u d g e t . Ch a n g e O r d e r # 1 : $ 5 , 8 0 0 Ch a n g e O r d e r # 2 : ( $ 3 0 , 9 6 3 . 1 4 ) ( R e c o n c i l i a t i o n c h a n g e o r d e r ) SR 5 2 4 W a l k w a y St r e e t R e i d Mi d d l e t o n $9 4 9 , 8 0 6 $0 $1 9 3 , 3 6 5 $ 5 8 1 , 3 2 1 1 1 2 F e b - 0 9 M a r - 1 0 C l - O u t W a i t i n g f o r d o c u m e n t a t i o n f r o m c o n t r a c t o r t o r e l e a s e re t a i n a g e . C h a n g e o r d e r 1 : $ 4 , 8 6 8 C h a n g e o r d e r 2 : $ 7 4 , 9 9 8 C h a n g e o r d e r 3 : $ 8 , 7 5 7 C h a n g e o r d e r 4 : $ 9 , 7 4 2 C h a n g e o r d e r 5 : $ 9 5 , 0 0 0 St a t e R o u t e ( S R ) 9 9 I n t e r n a t i o n a l Di s t r i c t E n h a n c e m e n t s ( P h a s e 1 an d 2 ) St r e e t C H 2 M H i l l $ 7 3 0 , 0 0 0 $2 2 4 , 9 6 2 _ $ 6 6 2 , 0 0 0 1 2 9 M a r - 1 2 O c t - 1 2 D e s D e s i g n a t 9 5 % A g r a n t w a s s e c u r e d f o r P h a s e 1 i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 3 7 3 , 0 0 0 (d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n ) . . A g r a n t w a s s e c u r e d i n 2 0 1 0 f o r P h a s e 2 i n t h e a m o u n t o f $2 8 9 , 0 0 0 ( d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n ) . T h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f P h a s e 1 w i l l b e c o m b i n e d w i t h P h a s e 2 , i n or d e r t o c o m p l e t e b o t h p r o j e c t s a s o n e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t i n 20 1 2 . 20 1 0 R e p l a c e m e n t P r o g r a m - Wa t e r l i n e Wa t e r C i t y $ 2 , 1 9 1 , 0 7 8 $1 , 6 4 7 , 5 9 9 $ 4 0 , 9 5 3 _ 4 1 2 J a n - 1 1 J a n - 1 2 C o n Co n s t r u c t i o n i n p r o g r e s s a n d 9 5 % p c t c o m p l e t e . E s t i m a t e d co m p l e t i o n d a t e i s J a n u a r y 2 0 1 2 . Ch a n g e o r d e r # 1 $ 4 0 , 9 5 3 . 20 1 1 R e p l a c e m e n t P r o g r a m - Wa t e r l i n e Wa t e r M S A $ 2 , 2 5 8 , 0 0 0 $1 , 4 9 3 , 9 7 2 $ 2 4 , 0 7 0 _ 4 1 2 J u n - 1 1 M a r - 1 2 C o n Co n s t r u c t i o n i n p r o g r e s s . 5 0 % c o m p l e t e . E s t i m a t e d co m p l e t i o n d a t e i s F e b / M a r 2 0 1 2 . Ch a n g e o r d e r # 1 $ 2 4 , 0 7 0 . 9 3 20 1 2 R e p l a c e m e n t P r o g r a m - Wa t e r l i n e Wa t e r C i t y $1 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 , 2 0 3 _ _ 4 1 2 A p r - 1 2 D e c - 1 2 D e s . De s i g n @ 8 5 % c o m p l e t e . 76 t h A v e W W a t e r l i n e E x t e n s i o n wi t h L y n n w o o d Wa t e r R o t h H i l l $ 5 2 4 , 0 0 0 $0 _ _ 4 1 2 M a y - 1 2 D e c - 1 2 P r e Ly n n w o o d a n d E d m o n d s h a v e a p p r o v e d & S i g n e d o f f in t e r l o c a l . De s i g n t o b e g i n J a n 2 0 1 2 . Al d e r w o o d M e t e r , S e a v i e w & Y o s t Im p r o v e m e n t s Wa t e r R H 2 $3 5 7 , 1 2 4 $8 8 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 4 4 5 _ 4 1 2 J a n - 1 1 S e p - 1 1 C l - O u t C o n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e . C h a n g e O r d e r # 1 - $ 6 , 4 4 5 . AM R M e t e r E v a l u a t i o n S t u d y W a t e r C o n s u l t a n t $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 _ _ O n h o l d On h o l d . PR V S t a t i o n s 1 1 & 1 2 W a t e r C i t y $1 6 , 0 0 0 $1 6 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 2 J u n - 1 1 J u n - 1 1 C o m p l e t e W o r k d o n e b y C i t y c r e w s . Pr o j e c t s c o m p l e t e . 2/ 9 / 2 0 1 2 P A G E 3 Pa c k e t Pa g e 72 of 12 1 PU B L I C W O R K S D E P A R T M E N T / E N G I N E E R I N G D I V I S I O N P R O J E C T S Ca p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m St a t u s Ci t y o r To t a l 20 1 1 Ch a n g e Ci t y Co m p l e t e * * A c t i v e Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n Ty p e Co n s u l t a n t Bu d g e t Bu d g e t Or d e r s G r a n t s F u n d ( s ) # A d v e r t i s e C o n s t P h a s e Comments Sc h e d u l e Pr o j e c t B u d g e t Ae r a t i o n B a s i n A i r D i f f u s e r Up g r a d e f o r E n e r g y S a v i n g s W W T P B r o w n & Ca l d w e l l $1 9 5 , 0 0 0 $4 5 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 4 A p r - 1 2 O c t - 1 2 D e s Pa r t s d e l i v e r e d f r o m S a n i t a i r . En g i n e e r i n g c o n s u l t a n t c o n t r a c t b e i n g a u t h o r i z e d f o r w a l l co n s t r u c t i o n . AT S R e p l a c e m e n t a n d N e w Bu i l d i n g W W T P H D R $4 5 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 4 A p r - 1 2 O c t - 1 2 P r e Se c u r e d d e s i g n c o n s u l t a n t b y O c t 2 0 1 1 . Co m p e t i t i v e l y b i d p r o j e c t b y s p r i n g 2 0 1 2 . Co n s t r u c t i o n d u r i n g d r y s e a s o n 2 0 1 2 . Co m p l e t e b y S e p t 2 0 1 2 . Fi b e r O p t i c N e t w o r k I n s t a l l a t i o n W W T P T r i u n i t y En g i n e e r i n g $5 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 4 M a r - 1 2 J u n - 1 2 D e s De s i g n i n p r o g r e s s Co n s t r u c t i o n c o m p l e t e b y W i n t e r / S p r i n g 2 0 1 2 . Li g h t i n g U p g r a d e f o r E n e r g y Sa v i n g s W W T P E n e r g y In d u s t r i e s $3 4 , 4 1 7 _ _ _ 4 1 4 J u n - 1 1 D e c - 1 1 C l - O u t Co m p l e t e - c l o s e o u t i n p r o g r e s s . No n - P o t a b l e W a t e r P u m p Mo d i f i c a t i o n f o r E n e r g y S a v i n g s W W T P C i t y $4 0 , 0 0 0 $1 5 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 4 M a r - 1 2 D e c - 1 2 D e s W a i t i n g f o r a u t h o r i z a t i o n t o p r o c e e d f r o m P U D . Od o r C o n t r o l P r o j e c t W W T P B r o w n & Ca l d w e l l $1 . 4 M _ _ _ 4 1 4 2 0 0 9 M a y - 1 1 C l - o u t Co m p l e t e - t h e p r o j e c t w a s s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o m p l e t e d 5 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 1 - st i l l a w a i t n g f i n a l d o c u m e n t s f o r c l o s e - o u t f r o m t h e v e n d o r . Ou t f a l l D i f f u s e r M o d i f i c a t i o n f o r En e r g y S a v i n g s WW T P R o s e d a l e Ma r i n e $4 4 , 7 7 5 _ _ _ 4 1 4 S e p - 1 1 D e c - 1 1 C l - O u t Co m p l e t e . Ro o f R e p l a c e m e n t f o r T h r e e Bu i l d i n g s WW T P W e t h e r h o l t $ 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 $2 6 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 4 M a r - 1 2 O c t - 1 2 D e s Co n d r a c t s u n d e r r e v i e w . To b e c o n s t r u c t e d d u r i n g d r y s e a s o n 2 0 1 2 . ( A p r i l - S e p t . 2 0 1 2 ) Ru s t R e m o v a l a n d S t e e l R e c o a t i n g on S e c o n d a r y C l a r i f i e r s WW T P C i t y $3 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ _ 4 1 4 M a y - 1 2 A u g - 1 2 _ No t y e t s t a r t e d . VF D R e p l a c e m e n t s WW T P C i t y $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 0 , 0 0 0 _ _ 4 1 4 F e b - 1 2 M a y - 1 2 D e s Bi d s a r e i n , d r a f t i n g c o n t r a c t d o c u m e n t s . Pr e De s RO W Ad Co n Cl - O u t St u d y St u d y Ri g h t - o f - W a y A c q u i s i t i o n Ad v e r t i s e f o r C o n t r u c t i o n B i d s ** A c t i v e P h a s e Pr e l i m i n a r y D e s i g n De s i g n Co n s t r u c t i o n Cl o s e - o u t C o n s t r u c i o n C o n t r a c t 2/ 9 / 2 0 1 2 P A G E 4 Pa c k e t Pa g e 73 of 12 1 AM-4542 Item #: 3. L. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Phil Williams Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Committee:Community/Development Services Finance Type:Action Information Subject Title Update to the City's General Facilities Charges for utilities by City staff and the FCS Group. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve proposed General Facilities Charges for sewer, water and storm utility connections and prepare an ordinance to implement the new charges over a three year period beginning in 2012. Previous Council Action On October 11, 2011, the CS/DS Committee reviewed this item and recommended it be forwarded to the full Council for discussion and approval. On November 7, 2011, the Finance Committee reviewed this item and recommended it be forwarded to the full Council for discussion and approval. On November 15, 2011, Council requested that public comment period be scheduled at a later meeting. Narrative A General Facilities Charge (GFC) is a one time charge paid by new customers connecting to a utility system. FCS Group, using data provided by the City, modeled a rate fee schedule for water, sewer, and storm utility connections. The data is based on equivalent residential units (ERUs). The term, ERU, is used to convert non-residential (commercial) customers into an equivalent number of residential units based on the defined water/sewer/storm use of a single-family residence. This updated fee schedule will be used by the City to charge a connection fee to new utility customers connecting water/sewer/storm utilities to the City systems. The study has been modeled using methodology consistent with RCW and case law requirements for a city in the State of Washington, you can find the finalized study attached as Exhibit A, B & C. The City has not updated its General Facilities Charge (GFC) rate schedule since March 2000. Attachments Exhibit A: GFC Study-Sewer Exhibit B: GFC Study-Storm Exhibit C: GFC Study-Water Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Megan Cruz 02/06/2012 04:10 PM Packet Page 74 of 121 Public Works Phil Williams 02/07/2012 08:36 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2012 11:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/07/2012 12:37 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2012 01:19 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/02/2012 Final Approval Date: 02/08/2012 Packet Page 75 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility Customer Base Year Customer Growth Rate [a] No of ERUs [b] 2011 12,626 2012 0.50%12,689 2013 0.50%12,753 2014 0.50%12,816 2015 0.50%12,880 2016 0.50%12,945 2017 0.50%13,010 2018 0.50%13,075 2019 0.50%13,140 2020 0.50%13,206 2021 0.50%13,272 2022 0.50%13,338 2023 0.50%13,405 2024 0.50%13,472 2025 0.50%13,539 2026 0.50%13,607 2027 0.50%13,675 2028 0.50%13,743 2029 0.50%13,812 2030 0.50%13,881 [b] WWTP flow data, provided by City staff. [a] Utility Rate Study & Water Utility Comp. Plan Update financial analysis projections. PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - Customer Page 1 of 7 Packet Page 76 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility Plant in Service Edmonds' Share in WWTP => 50.78700% 2011 2625 3RD AVE SANITARY SEWERS LID 1/1/1947 1947 16,859$ 16,859$ -$ 20,665$ 10.00 5.00%(1,903)$ 94 SEWER TRUNK LID 60 12/31/1947 1947 20,665$ 20,665$ -$ 20,665$ 10.00 5.00%-$ 95 SEWER TRUNK LID 61 12/31/1948 1948 5,690$ 5,690$ -$ 5,690$ 10.00 5.00%-$ 2626 NORTH CHERRY HILL SANITARY S 1/1/1950 1950 153,226$ 153,226$ -$ 10.00 5.00%76,613$ 99 SEWER TRUNK LID 71 12/31/1953 1953 49,602$ 49,602$ -$ 49,602$ 10.00 2.75%-$ 100 SEWER TRUNK LID 73 12/31/1953 1953 5,016$ 5,016$ -$ 5,016$ 10.00 2.75%-$ 101 SEWER TRUNK LID 74 12/31/1955 1955 53,232$ 53,232$ -$ 53,232$ 10.00 2.47%-$ 15 PUMP STATION NO.1 1979 BALAN 12/31/1957 1957 18,199$ 18,199$ -$ 10.00 3.33%6,065$ 103 SEWER TRUNK LID 80 12/31/1957 1957 5,745$ 5,745$ -$ 5,745$ 10.00 3.33%-$ 105 SEWER TRUNK LID 85 12/31/1958 1958 10,678$ 10,678$ -$ 10,678$ 10.00 3.20%-$ 106 SEWER TRUNK LID 86 12/31/1958 1958 16,593$ 16,593$ -$ 16,593$ 10.00 3.20%-$ 107 SEWER TRUNK LID 94 12/31/1959 1959 6,603$ 6,603$ -$ 6,603$ 10.00 3.63%-$ 108 SEWER TRUNK LID 95 12/31/1959 1959 54,685$ 54,685$ -$ 54,685$ 10.00 3.63%-$ 81 LITTLE METRO TRUNK WPC-WN-49 4/7/1960 1960 212,914$ 212,914$ -$ 10.00 3.58%76,314$ 109 SEWER TRUNK LID 96 12/31/1960 1960 17,947$ 17,947$ -$ 17,947$ 10.00 3.58%-$ 111 SEWER TRUNK LID 99 12/31/1960 1960 25,651$ 25,651$ -$ 25,651$ 10.00 3.58%-$ 160 SEWER LATERAL LID 99 12/31/1960 1960 6,032$ 6,032$ -$ 6,032$ 10.00 3.58%-$ 110 SEWER TRUNK LID 97 12/31/1961 1961 174,970$ 171,899$ 3,071$ 174,970$ 10.00 3.52%-$ 112 SEWER TRUNK LID 104 12/31/1961 1961 5,961$ 5,856$ 105$ 5,961$ 10.00 3.52%-$ 159 SEWER TRUNK LID 97 12/31/1961 1961 5,499$ 5,402$ 97$ 5,499$ 10.00 3.52%-$ 113 SEWER TRUNK LID 105 12/31/1962 1962 9,875$ 9,512$ 363$ 9,875$ 10.00 3.20%-$ 115 SEWER TRUNK LID 107 12/31/1962 1962 22,243$ 21,425$ 818$ 22,243$ 10.00 3.20%-$ 118 SEWER TRUNK LID 111 12/31/1962 1962 5,741$ 5,530$ 211$ 5,741$ 10.00 3.20%-$ 116 SEWER TRUNK LID 108 12/31/1963 1963 320,476$ 302,484$ 17,992$ 320,476$ 10.00 3.21%-$ 165 SEWER LATERAL LID 108 12/31/1963 1963 40,364$ 38,098$ 2,266$ 40,364$ 10.00 3.21%-$ 119 SEWER TRUNK LID 119 12/31/1964 1964 147,046$ 135,932$ 11,114$ 147,046$ 10.00 3.25%-$ 168 SEWER LATERAL LID 119 12/31/1964 1964 25,122$ 23,223$ 1,899$ 25,122$ 10.00 3.25%-$ 120 SEWER TRUNK LID 135 12/31/1965 1965 33,761$ 30,551$ 3,210$ 33,761$ 10.00 3.31%-$ 141 SEWER TRUNK MAPLEWOOD VILLAG 12/31/1965 1965 8,636$ 7,815$ 821$ 10.00 3.31%2,859$ 146 SEWER TRUNK SIERRA HEIGHLAND 12/31/1965 1965 5,000$ 4,524$ 476$ 10.00 3.31%1,655$ 170 SEWER LATERAL LID 135 12/31/1965 1965 9,631$ 8,715$ 916$ 9,631$ 10.00 3.31%-$ 125 SEWER TRUNK LID 145 12/31/1966 1966 8,852$ 7,838$ 1,014$ 8,852$ 10.00 3.90%-$ 126 SEWER TRUNK LID 147 12/31/1966 1966 15,469$ 13,659$ 1,810$ 15,469$ 10.00 3.90%-$ 127 SEWER TRUNK LID 149 12/31/1966 1966 15,093$ 13,362$ 1,731$ 15,093$ 10.00 3.90%-$ 22 LIFT STATION #8 12/31/1967 1967 14,274$ 14,274$ -$ 10.00 4.04%5,765$ 23 LIFT STATION #9 12/31/1967 1967 11,148$ 11,148$ -$ 10.00 4.04%4,502$ 122 SEWER TRUNK LID 138 12/31/1967 1967 27,342$ 23,670$ 3,672$ 27,342$ 10.00 4.04%-$ 123 SEWER TRUNK LID 139 12/31/1967 1967 626,397$ 523,681$ 102,716$ 626,397$ 10.00 4.04%-$ 131 SEWER TRUNK LID 159 12/31/1967 1967 6,149$ 5,323$ 826$ 6,149$ 10.00 4.04%-$ 172 SEWER LATERAL LID 139 12/31/1967 1967 148,345$ 128,424$ 19,921$ 148,345$ 10.00 4.04%-$ 124 SEWER TRUNK LID 140 12/31/1968 1968 17,113$ 14,478$ 2,635$ 17,113$ 10.00 4.58%-$ 128 SEWER TRUNK LID 151 12/31/1968 1968 845,836$ 695,915$ 149,921$ 845,836$ 10.00 4.58%-$ 129 SEWER TRUNK LID 153 12/31/1968 1968 58,118$ 49,170$ 8,948$ 58,118$ 10.00 4.58%-$ 130 SEWER TRUNK LID 154 12/31/1968 1968 6,341$ 5,365$ 976$ 6,341$ 10.00 4.58%-$ 177 SEWER LATERAL LID 151 12/31/1968 1968 11,337$ 9,592$ 1,745$ 11,337$ 10.00 4.58%-$ 178 SEWER LATERAL LID 153 12/31/1968 1968 5,202$ 4,401$ 801$ 5,202$ 10.00 4.58%-$ 190 SEWER LATERAL WS-11 3/31/1969 1969 6,129$ 5,058$ 1,071$ 10.00 5.95%3,647$ 193 SEWER LATERAL PRIOR 1961 UNK 3/31/1969 1969 835,148$ 696,500$ 138,648$ 10.00 5.95%496,885$ 194 SEWER LATERAL SINCE 1961 UNK 3/31/1969 1969 158,429$ 130,730$ 27,699$ 10.00 5.95%94,260$ 132 SEWER TRUNK LID 161 12/31/1969 1969 539,358$ 424,412$ 114,946$ 539,358$ 10.00 5.95%-$ 181 SEWER LATERAL LID 161 12/31/1969 1969 72,994$ 60,319$ 12,675$ 72,994$ 10.00 5.95%-$ 24 PUMP STA NO.10 1979 BALANCE 12/31/1970 1970 21,151$ 21,151$ -$ 10.00 6.61%13,977$ 133 SEWER TRUNK LID 164 12/31/1970 1970 781,829$ 607,895$ 173,935$ 781,829$ 10.00 6.61%-$ 134 SEWER TRUNK LID 173 12/31/1970 1970 14,013$ 11,303$ 2,710$ 14,013$ 10.00 6.61%-$ 82 OUTFALL EXPANSION WPC-WN-263 12/31/1971 1971 25,808$ 20,307$ 5,501$ 10.00 5.69%14,687$ 189 SEWER LATERAL WS-10 5/1/1972 1972 16,017$ 12,371$ 3,646$ 10.00 5.46%8,742$ 148 SEWER TRUNK WILLOW BROOKS PL 5/1/1976 1976 5,585$ 3,867$ 1,718$ 10.00 6.95%3,879$ 208 SEWER SERVICE COUNT 7,855 PE 12/31/1979 1979 119,585$ 112,278$ 7,307$ 10.00 6.81%81,456$ 2829 MEADOWDALE SLIDE AREA STUDY 12/31/1980 1980 35,568$ 21,278$ 14,289$ 10.00 9.05%32,172$ 2968 SANITARY SEWERS LID 206 11/30/1981 1981 115,434$ 44,321$ 71,113$ 115,434$ 10.00 12.20%-$ 2977 MEADOWDALE MONITORING SYSTEM 11/30/1981 1981 10,045$ 5,876$ 4,170$ 10.00 12.20%12,255$ 2995 SANITARY SEWERS LID 206 11/30/1981 1981 253,366$ 146,364$ 107,002$ 253,366$ 10.00 12.20%-$ 3030 SANITARY SEWERS LID 207 12/31/1981 1981 38,620$ 22,506$ 16,114$ 38,620$ 10.00 12.20%-$ 5633 SANITARY SEWERS LID 212 9/30/1988 1988 26,142$ 11,708$ 14,434$ 26,142$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5635 CULVERT (412 PORTION)9/30/1988 1988 149,621$ 67,008$ 82,613$ 10.00 8.00%119,697$ 5637 BALLINGER SEWER UPGRADE (412 9/30/1988 1988 163,809$ 71,364$ 92,445$ 10.00 8.00%131,047$ 5767 LID 210 SANITARY SEWERS (412 12/31/1988 1988 613,815$ 271,831$ 341,984$ 613,815$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5769 LID 210 SANITARY SEWERS STAT 12/31/1988 1988 297,249$ 131,638$ 165,611$ 297,249$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5774 LID 210 SANITARY SEWERS 12/31/1988 1988 648,233$ 287,073$ 361,160$ 648,233$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5779 LID 210 SANITARY SEWERS 12/31/1988 1988 39,190$ 17,356$ 21,834$ 39,190$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5911 STORM SEWER 7/31/1989 1989 152,017$ 65,375$ 86,642$ 10.00 7.50%114,012$ 6379 SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION 12/31/1990 1990 77,724$ 62,420$ 15,304$ 10.00 7.50%58,293$ 6394 AURORA TOYOTA SEWER PIPELINE 12/31/1990 1990 12,038$ 9,668$ 2,370$ 10.00 7.50%9,028$ 6719 ALLIED HOPAC - 8700C 11/8/1991 1991 6,000$ 6,000$ -$ 10.00 7.10%4,260$ 6852 6' X 10' & 4' X 10' TITAN TR 6/5/1992 1992 5,997$ 5,997$ -$ 10.00 6.60%3,958$ 6853 INLINE LATTERAL CUTTER 6/5/1992 1992 5,194$ 5,194$ -$ 10.00 6.60%3,428$ Allocable Interest CostOriginal Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value CIAC Applicable Asset AgeAsset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired Applicable Interest Rate PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - Plant in Service Page 2 of 7Packet Page 77 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility Plant in Service Edmonds' Share in WWTP => 50.78700% 2011 Allocable Interest CostOriginal Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value CIAC Applicable Asset AgeAsset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired Applicable Interest Rate 6902 EDMONDS WAY BASIN STUDY 7/31/1992 1992 180,934$ 66,938$ 113,996$ 10.00 6.60%119,416$ 7127 LOCKING MANHOLE FRAMES & LID 2/17/1994 1994 6,494$ 2,171$ 4,323$ 6,494$ 10.00 6.50%-$ 7478 STORAGE CONTAINER FOR BUILDI 5/4/1995 1995 6,708$ 6,708$ -$ 10.00 6.20%4,159$ 7605 UNI-HOIST CRANE W/ADAPTER 11/7/1995 1995 5,026$ 5,026$ -$ 10.00 6.20%3,116$ 7622 TRUCK-MOUNTED CRANES 12/20/1995 1995 16,463$ 16,463$ -$ 10.00 6.20%10,207$ 7637 1995 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/1995 1995 21,526$ 6,465$ 15,061$ 10.00 6.20%13,346$ 7735 TALBOT ROAD STORM DRAINAGE 8/31/1996 1996 189,780$ 68,388$ 121,392$ 10.00 6.00%113,868$ 7736 SIERRA DRIVE DRAINAGE IMP.8/31/1996 1996 7,897$ 2,846$ 5,051$ 10.00 6.00%4,738$ 7739 LIFT STATION BACKUP POWER 8/31/1996 1996 66,344$ 23,908$ 42,436$ 10.00 6.00%39,806$ 7740 SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 8/31/1996 1996 18,920$ 6,818$ 12,102$ 10.00 6.00%11,352$ 7744 LAKE BALLINGER MONITORING 8/31/1996 1996 131,354$ 47,334$ 84,020$ 10.00 6.00%78,813$ 7852 SEWER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 12/31/1996 1996 234,574$ 65,755$ 168,818$ 10.00 6.00%140,744$ 8382 ALDER ST SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 12/30/1999 1999 70,082$ 19,087$ 50,995$ 10.00 5.70%39,947$ 8416 GRIMMER SCHMIDT AIR COMPRESSOR #80 9/28/2000 2000 14,411$ 14,411$ -$ 10.00 6.00%8,647$ 8439 PROSCOUT PLUS, LATERAL 12/31/2000 2000 7,199$ 7,199$ 0$ 10.00 6.00%4,319$ 8477 pump and motor unit for l/s #3 8/28/2001 2001 5,294$ 4,984$ 310$ 10.00 5.50%2,912$ 8478 pump and motor unit for l/s #3 8/28/2001 2001 5,294$ 4,984$ 310$ 10.00 5.50%2,912$ 8483 SEWER TV CAMERA SOFTWARE 9/6/2001 2001 59,942$ 22,370$ 37,572$ 10.00 5.50%32,968$ 8488 RADIX METER READING SYSTEM 10/31/2001 2001 6,684$ 6,684$ -$ 10.00 5.50%3,676$ 8656 NORTH PERRINVILLE LID 216 12/31/2001 2001 28,470$ 10,340$ 18,130$ 28,470$ 10.00 5.50%-$ 8648 2002 CITY WIDE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2002 2002 4,522$ 1,461$ 3,060$ 9.00 5.22%2,124$ 8601 2002 CITY WIDE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2003 2003 18,023$ 2,553$ 15,471$ 8.00 4.75%6,846$ 8602 ADMIRAL WAY SEWER REPLACEMENT 12/31/2003 2003 33,480$ 4,742$ 28,738$ 8.00 4.75%12,718$ 8654 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE 12/31/2003 2003 44,412$ 12,578$ 31,835$ 8.00 4.75%16,871$ 8658 SEWER TV CAMERA 11/18/2004 2004 59,672$ 36,762$ 22,909$ 7.00 4.68%19,538$ 8675 DIESEL GENERATOR LIFT STATION #1 9/1/2005 2005 21,744$ 7,724$ 14,019$ 6.00 4.37%5,701$ 8682 LIFT STATION #1 RENOVATION 12/31/2005 2005 1,061,724$ 215,756$ 845,968$ 6.00 4.37%278,384$ 8686 DALEY STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2005 2005 709,242$ 144,127$ 565,115$ 6.00 4.37%185,963$ 8727 96TH/228TH MAJOR RD CONSTRUCTION 12/31/2006 2006 90,946$ 14,589$ 76,357$ 5.00 4.40%20,012$ 8740 SW EDMONDS STUDY/STORM PROJECT 5/30/2007 2007 58,822$ 14,120$ 44,702$ 4.00 4.40%10,343$ 8741 2005 MEADOWDALE BCH RD DRAINAGE 5/30/2007 2007 101,530$ 24,372$ 77,157$ 4.00 4.40%17,852$ 8810 TELEMETRY UPGRADE/ALL LIFT STATIONS 12/31/2008 2008 232,242$ 19,354$ 212,888$ 3.00 4.44%30,911$ 8874 ULTRA SHORTY CRAWLER 7/27/2011 2011 6,012$ -$ 6,012$ 0.00 4.44%-$ WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ASSETS 35 INITIAL SITE AQUISITION TREA 12/31/1955 1955 7,000$ -$ 7,000$ 3,445$ 10.00 2.47%877$ 52 OUTFALL SEWER EXPANSION-POWE 12/31/1971 1971 23,872$ 23,872$ -$ 11,748$ 10.00 5.69%6,899$ 3025 SECONDARY TREATMENT FACILITY 12/31/1981 1981 137,284$ 133,105$ 4,180$ 67,562$ 10.00 12.20%85,062$ 4305 LAND 4/20/1984 1984 143,350$ -$ 143,350$ 70,547$ 10.00 10.50%76,443$ 6693 RIGHT TO USE LYNNWOOD SECOND 12/31/1993 1993 1,250,000$ 853,915$ 396,085$ 615,163$ 10.00 5.80%368,206$ 7105 SECONDARY SEWAGE TREATMENT P 12/31/1993 1993 35,974,014$ 13,243,311$ 22,730,703$ 17,703,892$ 10.00 5.80%10,596,671$ 7608 UNI-HOIST EQUIPMENT 12/20/1995 1995 6,676$ 6,676$ -$ 3,285$ 10.00 6.20%2,102$ 7918 FORKLIFT 1/25/1996 1996 6,852$ 6,852$ -$ 3,372$ 10.00 6.00%2,088$ 7803 LAB MICROSCOPE W/ACCESORIES 12/19/1996 1996 9,922$ 9,922$ -$ 4,883$ 10.00 6.00%3,023$ 7881 JET MILLING MACHINE JTM-4VS 2/6/1997 1997 5,800$ 5,800$ -$ 2,854$ 10.00 5.80%1,709$ 7895 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE 5/8/1997 1997 36,954$ 36,954$ -$ 18,186$ 10.00 5.80%10,885$ 7905 LATHE MODEL #GH-1340A 6/5/1997 1997 5,004$ 5,004$ -$ 2,463$ 10.00 5.80%1,474$ 8613 SOLIDS HANDLING IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/1997 1997 32,249$ 28,117$ 4,132$ 15,871$ 10.00 5.80%9,499$ 8618 SCADA UPGRADE 12/31/1998 1998 368,099$ 368,099$ -$ 181,153$ 10.00 5.30%99,082$ 8619 CONNECTION TO CITY NETWORK 12/31/1998 1998 8,967$ 6,403$ 2,564$ 4,413$ 10.00 5.30%2,414$ 8421 COMPACT ELECTRIC ACUATOR 10/12/2000 2000 6,152$ 6,152$ -$ 3,028$ 10.00 6.00%1,875$ 8614 WWTP EMERGENCY GENERATOR 12/31/2000 2000 739,600$ 739,600$ -$ 363,979$ 10.00 6.00%225,372$ 8627 DEWATERED SLUDGE MIXER UPGRADE 12/31/2000 2000 11,138$ 11,138$ -$ 5,481$ 10.00 6.00%3,394$ 8630 BELT PRESS IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2000 2000 218,867$ 218,867$ -$ 107,711$ 10.00 6.00%66,694$ 8631 PARKING LOT CONTAINMENT 12/31/2000 2000 6,828$ 2,753$ 4,075$ 3,360$ 10.00 6.00%2,081$ 8632 PLC UPGRADE 12/31/2000 2000 223,382$ 223,382$ -$ 109,933$ 10.00 6.00%68,069$ 8580 2000 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 12/31/2001 2001 187,619$ 68,142$ 119,477$ 92,333$ 10.00 5.50%52,407$ 8634 PRIMARY CLARIFIER 12/31/2001 2001 32,396$ 29,414$ 2,982$ 15,943$ 10.00 5.50%9,049$ 8640 CAT WALK INSTALLATION 12/31/2001 2001 9,310$ 8,453$ 857$ 4,582$ 10.00 5.50%2,600$ 8642 ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2001 2001 215,205$ 130,239$ 84,966$ 105,909$ 10.00 5.50%60,113$ 8646 ELECTRONIC UPGRADE 12/31/2002 2002 30,550$ 24,678$ 5,872$ 15,035$ 9.00 5.22%7,290$ 8647 INCINERATOR IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2002 2002 467,286$ 356,808$ 110,478$ 229,965$ 9.00 5.22%111,500$ 8650 DATA SERVER UPGRADE 12/31/2002 2002 11,560$ 11,560$ -$ 5,689$ 9.00 5.22%2,758$ 8573 2003 CHEV. S-10 TRUCK #131 3/20/2003 2003 15,220$ 14,897$ 323$ 7,490$ 8.00 4.75%2,936$ 8560 WWTP VENTURI SCRUBER 4/16/2003 2003 30,733$ 23,801$ 6,932$ 15,125$ 8.00 4.75%5,929$ 8564 WWTP ACCESS PLATFORM INSTALLATION 4/16/2003 2003 15,448$ 11,963$ 3,484$ 7,602$ 8.00 4.75%2,980$ 8651 ODOR CONTROL 12/31/2003 2003 23,188$ 16,411$ 6,777$ 11,411$ 8.00 4.75%4,473$ 8652 HEAT EXCHANGER REPLACEMENT 12/31/2003 2003 328,179$ 232,267$ 95,911$ 161,507$ 8.00 4.75%63,313$ 8653 DISINFECTION CONVERSION 12/31/2003 2003 357,732$ 253,141$ 104,591$ 176,051$ 8.00 4.75%69,015$ 8655 BUILDING 100 HEAT REPLACEMENT 12/31/2003 2003 13,903$ 9,236$ 4,667$ 6,842$ 8.00 4.75%2,682$ 8666 OUTFALL SLIP LINING PROJECT 12/31/2004 2004 920,606$ 223,899$ 696,707$ 453,058$ 7.00 4.68%153,087$ 8683 SEWER MAIN REHAB PROJECT SR 104 12/31/2005 2005 1,356,836$ 136,969$ 1,219,867$ 667,740$ 6.00 4.37%180,681$ 8692 CALIBRATION METER FLUKE 744 2/2/2006 2006 4,470$ 4,387$ 83$ 2,200$ 5.00 4.40%500$ 8693 VFD 411 3/2/2006 2006 5,461$ 2,551$ 2,910$ 2,688$ 5.00 4.40%610$ 8725 LAKE BALLINGER MTR STN A REHAB 12/31/2006 2006 350,013$ 56,148$ 293,864$ 172,252$ 5.00 4.40%39,115$ 8726 OUTFALL PROJECT 12/31/2006 2006 1,193,347$ 191,435$ 1,001,913$ 587,282$ 5.00 4.40%133,360$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - Plant in Service Page 3 of 7Packet Page 78 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility Plant in Service Edmonds' Share in WWTP => 50.78700% 2011 Allocable Interest CostOriginal Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value CIAC Applicable Asset AgeAsset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired Applicable Interest Rate 8733 WWTP VFD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 12/31/2006 2006 234,371$ 94,406$ 139,965$ 115,341$ 5.00 4.40%26,192$ 8743 ALLEN-BRADLEY POWER FLEX 700 VFD 6/1/2007 2007 7,205$ 2,541$ 4,664$ 3,546$ 4.00 4.40%643$ 8776 SCREENING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2007 2007 1,511,695$ 233,053$ 1,278,642$ 743,951$ 4.00 4.40%134,995$ 8782 INCINERATOR PROJECT 12/31/2007 2007 120,652$ 37,201$ 83,451$ 59,376$ 4.00 4.40%10,774$ 8784 WWTP CONCRETE REPAIR 12/31/2007 2007 177,034$ 54,585$ 122,448$ 87,124$ 4.00 4.40%15,809$ 8785 CLARIFIER REPAIR 12/31/2007 2007 105,089$ 32,403$ 72,687$ 51,718$ 4.00 4.40%9,385$ 8786 SWITCH GEAR IMPROVEMENT 12/31/2007 2007 309,036$ 95,286$ 213,750$ 152,086$ 4.00 4.40%27,597$ 8802 QUAD CORE PROCESSOR 12/10/2008 2008 5,823$ 2,022$ 3,801$ 2,866$ 3.00 4.44%394$ 8834 WWTP CLAY FEEDER 12/31/2009 2009 90,876$ 4,922$ 85,954$ 44,723$ 2.00 4.44%4,095$ 8835 AERATION BASINS CONTROL UPGRADE 12/31/2009 2009 21,850$ 2,367$ 19,483$ 10,753$ 2.00 4.44%985$ 8847 LIFT STATIONS 2 & 13 IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2010 2010 773,459$ -$ 773,459$ 380,642$ 1.00 4.44%17,428$ 8852 WWTP ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2010 2010 279,870$ -$ 279,870$ 137,733$ 1.00 4.44%6,306$ 8854 CP301 UPGRADE 12/31/2010 2010 49,222$ -$ 49,222$ 24,224$ 1.00 4.44%1,109$ 8859 SECONDARY CLARIFIER #2 REFURBISHMENT 12/31/2010 2010 95,648$ -$ 95,648$ 47,071$ 1.00 4.44%2,155$ 8861 THREE HUNDRED PLC UPGRADE 12/31/2010 2010 27,320$ -$ 27,320$ 13,445$ 1.00 4.44%616$ Total Plant-in-Service 60,682,776$ 25,531,896$ 35,150,880$ 30,283,923$ 15,416,565$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - Plant in Service Page 4 of 7Packet Page 79 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility Capital Improvement Program (Source: City Capital Improvement Program; 2011-2017) Project Costs in Year: 2011 Project ID Project Name % Growth 2012 - 2017 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitations Lift Stations 7 and 8 and West Dayton Sewer -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Lift Station 2 339,195 339,195 - - - - - Lift Stations 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, & 15 4,129,618 2,840,667 1,288,952 - - - - - - - - - - - Sewer Main Replacement and CIPP 2012 Sewer Replacement / Rehab /Improvements (224th, Alder St, Beach Pl, Dellwood)1,210,784$ 1,210,784$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2013 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements (200th, 216th, 72nd W, 76th W, 8th S, Hemlock, 7th Ave)1,916,403 145,098 1,771,305 - - - - 2015 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements (Walnut St, NW Traction, 7117 - 176th, 8015 - 196th, 465 Admiral W, 1053 Alder, 240th St, 76th Ave W, Ballinger)1,815,365 - - 178,566 1,636,799 - - 2016 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements (238th St)361,699 - - - 34,863 326,837 - Citywide Sewer Improvements 177,457 29,412 28,281 31,725 30,505 29,332 28,203 GFC Study - - - - - - - Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation 1,614,398 103,922 188,537 407,892 174,313 377,119 362,615 Infiltration & Inflow Study & Projects I & I Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Meter Installations Basin LS-01 52,549 52,549 - - - - - Meter Installations Basin Edmonds Zone 18,129 - - 18,129 - - - Smoke Test Zone 1 - - - - - - - Smoke Test in Basin LS-01 70,701 - 70,701 - - - - Smoke Test in Basin Edmonds Zone 87,157 - - - 87,157 - - - - - - - - - Sewer Comp Plan Update 170,588$ 170,588$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfer to Const. Improvement Fund 112 (Dayton Street)- - - - - - - Transfer to Const. Improvement Fund 132 (Interurban Trail)- - - - - - - Total Capital Projects in Current Dollars 11,964,044$ 4,892,215$ 3,347,775$ 636,312$ 1,963,636$ 733,288$ 390,818$ Total Growth Related Project Costs - - - - - - - Total Repair & Replacement Project Costs 11,964,044 4,892,215 3,347,775 636,312 1,963,636 733,288 390,818 WWTP Projects Through Fund 414 Project ID Project Name % Growth 2012 - 2017 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Edmonds' Contribution for R&R, Upgrades, and Studies & Consulting 2,183,843$ 558,657$ 304,722$ 330,116$ 330,116$ 330,116$ 330,116$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - CIP Page 5 of 7Packet Page 80 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility Capital Improvement Program (Source: City Capital Improvement Program; 2011-2017) Cumulative Construction Cost Inflation ==>2.00%6.08%10.32%14.74%19.33%24.10% Construction Cost Inflation ==> 2.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN INFLATED DOLLARS Project ID Project Name % Growth 2012 - 2017 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitations Lift Stations 7 and 8 and West Dayton Sewer -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Lift Station 2 345,979 345,979 - - - - - Lift Stations 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, & 15 4,264,800 2,897,480 1,367,320 - - - - - - - - - - - Sewer Main Replacement and CIPP 2012 Sewer Replacement / Rehab /Improvements (224th, Alder St, Beach Pl, Dellwood)1,235,000$ 1,235,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2013 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements (200th, 216th, 72nd W, 76th W, 8th S, Hemlock, 7th Ave)2,027,000 148,000 1,879,000 - - - - 2015 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements (Walnut St, NW Traction, 7117 - 176th, 8015 - 196th, 465 Admiral W, 1053 Alder, 240th St, 76th Ave W, Ballinger)2,075,000 - - 197,000 1,878,000 - - 2016 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements (238th St)430,000 - - - 40,000 390,000 - Citywide Sewer Improvements 200,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 GFC Study - - - - - - - Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation 1,856,000 106,000 200,000 450,000 200,000 450,000 450,000 Infiltration & Inflow Study & Projects I & I Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Meter Installations Basin LS-01 53,600 53,600 - - - - - Meter Installations Basin Edmonds Zone 20,000 - - 20,000 - - - Smoke Test Zone 1 - - - - - - - Smoke Test in Basin LS-01 75,000 - 75,000 - - - - Smoke Test in Basin Edmonds Zone 100,000 - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - - Sewer Comp Plan Update 174,000$ 174,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Transfer to Const. Improvement Fund 112 (Dayton Street)- - - - - - - Transfer to Const. Improvement Fund 132 (Interurban Trail)- - - - - - - Total Capital Projects in Current Dollars 12,856,379$ 4,990,059$ 3,551,320$ 702,000$ 2,253,000$ 875,000$ 485,000$ Total Growth Related Project Costs - - - - - - - Total Repair & Replacement Project Costs 12,856,379 4,990,059 3,551,320 702,000 2,253,000 875,000 485,000 PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - CIP Page 6 of 7Packet Page 81 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Sewer Utility - General Facilities Charge (GFC) Calculation Existing Cost Basis Total Notes PLANT-IN-SERVICE Utility Capital Assets 60,682,776$ Fixed Assets at Original Cost less: Contributed Capital (30,283,923) CIAC Additions at Original Cost plus: Interest on Non-Contributed Plant 15,416,565 Interest on assets up to a maximum 10-year period plus: 2011 Construction-Work-in-Progress 1,342,594 $1,108174 for sewer, $233,620 for WWTP 2011 Year-end Estimated Cash Balances 5,584,776$ $2,173,498 in Fund 411 & $3,411,278 in Fund 412-300 less: Debt Principal Outstanding (3,746,849) Total principal outstanding for the existing debt at the end of 2011 less: Net Debt Principal Outstanding -$ Debt principal outstanding, net of cash reserves TOTAL EXISTING COST BASIS 47,158,012$ Future Cost Basis Notes CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Total Sewer Projects 11,964,044$ Total WWTP Projects 2,183,843 TOTAL FUTURE COST BASIS 14,147,887$ Planned Capital Improvements Project costs 2012 through 2017 Customer Base Notes Existing Equivalent Residential Units 12,626 No of ERUs (2011) Future Equivalent Residential Units (Incremental)1,255 Projected Incremental ERUs (2011 - 2030) TOTAL CUSTOMER BASE 13,881 No of ERUs (2030) Resulting Charge Notes Reimbursement Charge Component for Existing Assets Existing Cost Basis 47,158,012$ Total Customer Base 13,881 Reimbursement Charge 3,397$ Improvement Charge Component for Future Assets Future Cost Basis 14,147,887 Total Customer Base 13,881 Improvement Charge 1,019$ TOTAL GFC PER ERU 4,417$ Existing GFC per ERU 730$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 S - GFC Page 7 of 7 Packet Page 82 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Stormwater Utility Customer Base Year Customer Growth Rate [a]No of ESUs 2011 21,124 2012 0.25%21,177 2013 0.25%21,230 2014 0.25%21,283 2015 0.25%21,336 2016 0.25%21,389 2017 0.25%21,443 2018 0.25%21,496 2019 0.25%21,550 2020 0.25%21,604 2021 0.25%21,658 2022 0.25%21,712 2023 0.25%21,766 2024 0.25%21,821 2025 0.25%21,875 2026 0.25%21,930 2027 0.25%21,985 2028 0.25%22,040 2029 0.25%22,095 2030 0.25%22,150 [a] Comprehensive Plan Update financial analysis projections. PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 SW - Customer Page 1 of 5 Packet Page 83 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Stormwater Utility Plant in Service 2011 8624 1999 MEADOWDALE STORM DRAINAGE 12/31/1999 1999 41,487$ 18,386$ 23,101$ 10.00 5.70%23,648$ 8626 2000 MEADOWDALE DRAINAGE 12/31/2000 2000 42,003$ 16,935$ 25,068$ 10.00 6.00%25,202$ 8629 MARINA BEACH PROJECTS 12/31/2000 2000 110,126$ 44,401$ 65,725$ 10.00 6.00%66,076$ 8479 GIS SOFTWARE UPGRADES 7/5/2001 2001 5,724$ 5,724$ -$ 10.00 5.50%3,148$ 8636 2001 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2001 2001 507$ 184$ 323$ 10.00 5.50%279$ 8643 MEADOWDALE STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 12/31/2002 2002 144,716$ 77,935$ 66,781$ 9.00 5.22%67,992$ 8645 VACTOR STATION SHED 12/31/2002 2002 54,344$ 14,637$ 39,706$ 9.00 5.22%25,532$ 8579 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS LID 215 6/11/2003 2003 2,889,869$ 876,211$ 2,013,658$ 2,889,869$ 8.00 4.75%-$ 8596 STORMWATER COMP PLAN 12/31/2003 2003 6,540$ 2,315$ 4,225$ 8.00 4.75%2,484$ 8598 2001 CITY WIDE STORM DRAINAGE 12/31/2003 2003 6,151$ 1,742$ 4,409$ 8.00 4.75%2,336$ 8599 2002 STORM DRAINAGE PROJECT 12/31/2003 2003 20,838$ 5,901$ 14,936$ 8.00 4.75%7,916$ 8600 ESA STORMWATER PLAN 12/31/2003 2003 24,001$ 8,496$ 15,505$ 8.00 4.75%9,117$ 8681 2004 CITYWIDE STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT 12/31/2005 2005 60,607$ 10,264$ 50,343$ 6.00 4.37%15,891$ 8687 SHELLABARGER CREEK/5TH AVENUE SOUTH 12/31/2005 2005 138,180$ 23,402$ 114,778$ 6.00 4.37%36,231$ 8690 WOODWAY ELEMENTARY ( 1 OF 2 - 8691)12/31/2005 2005 55,359$ 11,250$ 44,109$ 6.00 4.37%14,515$ 8729 157TH ST STORM IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2006 2006 64,041$ 10,273$ 53,768$ 5.00 4.40%14,092$ 8730 242ND ST SW STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2006 2006 116,871$ 18,748$ 98,123$ 5.00 4.40%25,717$ 8734 MARINA BEACH STORMWATER REPAIR 12/31/2006 2006 818,850$ 131,358$ 687,492$ 5.00 4.40%180,181$ 8735 2005 CITYWIDE STORM DRAINAGE 12/31/2006 2006 90,134$ 14,459$ 75,675$ 5.00 4.40%19,833$ 8778 DALEY ST/GLEN ST GROUNDWATER ISS 12/31/2007 2007 146,078$ 22,520$ 123,558$ 4.00 4.40%25,685$ 8779 242ND ST STORM IMPROVEMENTS/PHASE2 12/31/2007 2007 157,254$ 19,395$ 137,860$ 4.00 4.40%27,651$ 8780 2006 CITY-WIDE STORM IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2007 2007 333,702$ 41,157$ 292,545$ 4.00 4.40%58,676$ 8789 SPECTRA DG511 PIPE LASER 8/11/2008 2008 5,336$ 1,290$ 4,047$ 3.00 4.44%710$ 8805 74TH PL W & MEADOW BCH RD DRAINAGE 12/31/2008 2008 101,958$ 8,496$ 93,461$ 3.00 4.44%13,571$ 8806 2007 CITY-WIDE STORM IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2008 2008 85,114$ 6,451$ 78,663$ 3.00 4.44%11,329$ 8807 SW EDMONDS BASIN STORM PROJECT 12/31/2008 2008 183,375$ 15,281$ 168,094$ 3.00 4.44%24,407$ 8808 DAYTON ST STORMWATER OUT 12/31/2008 2008 423,029$ 35,252$ 387,777$ 3.00 4.44%56,305$ 8809 NORTHSTREAM LANE STORM IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2008 2008 115,846$ 9,654$ 106,192$ 3.00 4.44%15,419$ 8811 WILLOW CREEK STORMWATER OUT 12/31/2008 2008 756,795$ 62,694$ 694,101$ 3.00 4.44%100,729$ 8812 220TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2008 2008 669,102$ 55,758$ 613,343$ 3.00 4.44%89,057$ 8813 NORTHSTREAM CULVERT 12/31/2008 2008 544,614$ 45,385$ 499,229$ 3.00 4.44%72,488$ 8841 INFO WATER SOFTWARE 12/13/2010 2010 8,760$ -$ 8,760$ 1.00 4.44%389$ 8843 N MEADOWDALE STORM/LORIAN WOODS 12/31/2010 2010 60,082$ -$ 60,082$ 1.00 4.44%2,666$ 8844 93RD AVE W STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/2010 2010 299,906$ -$ 299,906$ 1.00 4.44%13,306$ 8853 LAKE BALLINGER WATER QUALITY IMP 12/31/2010 2010 25,539$ -$ 25,539$ 1.00 4.44%1,133$ 8855 LAKE BALLINGER/MCALEER CREEK WATER 12/31/2010 2010 221,307$ -$ 221,307$ 1.00 4.44%9,819$ 8856 UPPER EDMONDS STREET STORM PROJECT 12/31/2010 2010 56,521$ -$ 56,521$ 1.00 4.44%2,508$ 8857 MOUNTAIN LANE STORM IMPROVEMENT 12/31/2010 2010 24,487$ -$ 24,487$ 1.00 4.44%1,086$ 8858 12TH AVENUE NORTH STORM IMP 12/31/2010 2010 23,985$ -$ 23,985$ 1.00 4.44%1,064$ 8860 PERRINVILLE STREAM DIVERSION MODS 12/31/2010 2010 30,832$ -$ 30,832$ 1.00 4.44%1,368$ 8862 HARTER PROPERTY STORM EASEMENT 12/31/2010 2010 1,696$ -$ 1,696$ 1.00 4.44%75$ 8864 OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SITE 12/31/2010 2010 180,472$ -$ 180,472$ 1.00 4.44%8,007$ 8865 20719 86TH PL W 4/28/2011 2011 138,727$ -$ 138,727$ 0.00 4.44%-$ 8869 20719 86TH PL W BUILDING 4/28/2011 2011 163,268$ -$ 163,268$ 0.00 4.44%-$ Total Plant-in-Service 9,448,135$ 1,615,958$ 7,832,177$ 2,889,869$ 1,077,638$ Allocable Interest Cost Original Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value CIAC Applicable Asset AgeAsset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired Applicable Interest Rate PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 SW - Plant in Service Page 2 of 5Packet Page 84 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Stormwater Utility Capital Improvement Program Project Costs in Year: 2011 [NOTE: Capital Improvement Program costs are inflated]. Project ID Description Outside Funding 2012 - 2017 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 1 - Replace Infiltration Pipe (near 107th PL W)0%67,873$ -$ 67,873$ -$ -$ -$ -$ SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 2 - Connect sumps near Robin Hood LN 0%461,091 - - - 91,514 369,577 - SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 3 - Connect sumps on 238th St SW to Hickman Park infiltration System 0%525,264 102,941 422,323 - - - - SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 4 - Connect sumps on 105th & 106th Ave W near 228th St SW 0%203,243 14,706 188,537 - - - - Edmonds Marsh - Shelbarger / Willow Creek Flood Plain Delineation Study (See Note 1)0%- - - - - - - Willow Creek Pipe Rehabilitation 0%470,436 - - 470,436 - - - Northstream Culvert Abandonment South of Puget Dr 0%199,269 - 43,363 155,906 - - - Rehabilitation of Northstream Culvert under Puget Dr 0%73,351 - - 26,286 47,065 - - Talbot Rd / Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvement & Habitat Enhancement 0%586,275 586,275 - - - - - Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement at Talbot Rd 0%144,753 144,753 - - - - - 95th / 93rd St Drainage Improvement Project 0%214,027 25,490 188,537 - - - - City-wide Drainage Replacement Projects (See Note 2)0%839,121 140,196 140,460 139,590 140,322 139,953 138,599 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects (See Note 3)0%598,704 100,000 99,925 99,707 100,230 99,727 99,115 North Talbot Rd Drainage Improvement Project 0%176,471 176,471 - - - - - Public Works Yard Water Quality Upgrade (Vehicle Wash Station & Cover for Material Piles) (See Note 4)0%122,549 122,549 - - - - - Stormwater Utility for Drainage Portions of Transportation Projects (See Note 5)0%- - - - - - - NPDES Phase II Permit Capacity Building (Illicit discharge, Public Education, O&M) (See Note 6)0%23,631 23,631 - - - - - Dayton Emergency Storm 0%- - - - - - - Dayton St Storm Cured in-place pipe (CIPP) Rehabilitation 0%- - - - - - - Low Impact Development Retrofit Project (See Note 7)0%569,684 - 116,893 115,116 114,175 112,298 111,202 BNSF Utility Crossings 0%- - - - - - - Goodhope Pond Basin Study 0%181,286 - - 181,286 - - - SW Perrinville Creek Basin Study 0%235,671 - 235,671 - - - - 0%- - - - - - - Dayton St and Hwy 104 0%618,401 147,059 471,342 - - - - 0%- - - - - - - Dayton St between 6th and 8th Ave N 0%147,059 147,059 - - - - - 88th Ave W and 194th St SW 0%90,643 - - 90,643 - - - 0%- - - - - - - Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement at Talbot Rd - Construction 75%548,389 - - 548,389 - - - Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr - Feasibility Study (See Notes 8 & 9)67%147,059 147,059 - - - - - Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr Daylighting/Restoration (See Notes 8 & 9)75%6,029,812 - - 853,855 2,075,196 3,100,760 - Shell Creek Channel Restoration in Yost Park 75%161,344 - - 161,344 - - - Perrinville Creek High Flow Management Project 75%7,479,342 - - - 2,788,137 2,403,508 2,287,697 0%- - - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Shell Valley Emergency Access) (See Note 10)0%- - - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Dayton St Overlay)0%- - - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Main St LID Retrofit)0%117,647 117,647 - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (226th Walkway)0%- - - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 0%299,738 50,000 49,962 49,854 49,679 50,283 49,960 Transfer to Parks Fund 125 (Interurban Trail - Permeable Paving - includes design)0%- - - - - - - Transfer to Parks Fund 125 (Interurban Trail - 76th Storm Pipe - from City-Wide)0%- - - - - - - Transfer to Parks Fund 125 (Interurban Trail - Stormwater Vault - from Lake Ballinger Associated 0%- - - - - - - Total Capital Projects in Current Dollars 21,332,131$ 2,045,835$ 2,024,887$ 2,892,411$ 5,406,318$ 6,276,106$ 2,686,574$ Grant Funded Project Costs 10,762,204 98,039 - 1,172,691 3,647,500 4,128,201 1,715,773 Total Repair & Replacement Project Costs 10,569,927 1,947,796 2,024,887 1,719,720 1,758,818 2,147,905 970,801 PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 SW - CIP Page 3 of 5Packet Page 85 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Stormwater Utility Capital Improvement Program Cumulative Construction Cost Inflation ==>2.00%6.08%10.32%14.74%19.33%24.10% Construction Cost Inflation ==> 2.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN INFLATED DOLLARS Project ID Description Outside Funding 2012 - 2017 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 1 - Replace Infiltration Pipe (near 107th PL W)72,000$ 72,000$ SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 2 - Connect sumps near Robin Hood LN 546,000 105,000 441,000 SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 3 - Connect sumps on 238th St SW to Hickman Park infiltration System 553,000 105,000 448,000 SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 4 - Connect sumps on 105th & 106th Ave W near 228th St SW 215,000 15,000 200,000 Edmonds Marsh - Shelbarger / Willow Creek Flood Plain Delineation Study (See Note 1)- Willow Creek Pipe Rehabilitation 519,000 519,000 Northstream Culvert Abandonment South of Puget Dr 218,000 46,000 172,000 Rehabilitation of Northstream Culvert under Puget Dr 83,000 29,000 54,000 Talbot Rd / Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvement & Habitat Enhancement 598,000 598,000 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement at Talbot Rd 147,648 147,648 95th / 93rd St Drainage Improvement Project 226,000 26,000 200,000 City-wide Drainage Replacement Projects (See Note 2)946,000 143,000 149,000 154,000 161,000 167,000 172,000 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects (See Note 3)675,000 102,000 106,000 110,000 115,000 119,000 123,000 North Talbot Rd Drainage Improvement Project 180,000 180,000 Public Works Yard Water Quality Upgrade (Vehicle Wash Station & Cover for Material Piles) (See Note 4)125,000 125,000 Stormwater Utility for Drainage Portions of Transportation Projects (See Note 5)- NPDES Phase II Permit Capacity Building (Illicit discharge, Public Education, O&M) (See Note 6)24,104 24,104 Dayton Emergency Storm - Dayton St Storm Cured in-place pipe (CIPP) Rehabilitation - Low Impact Development Retrofit Project (See Note 7)654,000 - 124,000 127,000 131,000 134,000 138,000 BNSF Utility Crossings - Goodhope Pond Basin Study 200,000 200,000 SW Perrinville Creek Basin Study 250,000 250,000 - Dayton St and Hwy 104 650,000 150,000 500,000 - Dayton St between 6th and 8th Ave N 150,000 150,000 88th Ave W and 194th St SW 100,000 100,000 - Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement at Talbot Rd - Construction 75%605,000 605,000 Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr - Feasibility Study (See Notes 8 & 9)67%150,000 150,000 Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr Daylighting/Restoration (See Notes 8 & 9)75%7,023,000 942,000 2,381,000 3,700,000 Shell Creek Channel Restoration in Yost Park 75%178,000 178,000 Perrinville Creek High Flow Management Project 75%8,906,000 3,199,000 2,868,000 2,839,000 - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Shell Valley Emergency Access) (See Note 10)- Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Dayton St Overlay)- Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Main St LID Retrofit)120,000 120,000 Transfer to Street Fund 112 (226th Walkway)- Transfer to Street Fund 112 338,000 51,000 53,000 55,000 57,000 60,000 62,000 Transfer to Parks Fund 125 (Interurban Trail - Permeable Paving - includes design)- Transfer to Parks Fund 125 (Interurban Trail - 76th Storm Pipe - from City-Wide)- Transfer to Parks Fund 125 (Interurban Trail - Stormwater Vault - from Lake Ballinger Associated - Total Capital Projects in Current Dollars 24,451,752$ 2,086,752$ 2,148,000$ 3,191,000$ 6,203,000$ 7,489,000$ 3,334,000$ Grant Project Costs 12,634,000 100,000 - 1,293,750 4,185,000 4,926,000 2,129,250 Total Repair & Replacement Project Costs 11,817,752 1,986,752 2,148,000 1,897,250 2,018,000 2,563,000 1,204,750 PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 SW - CIP Page 4 of 5Packet Page 86 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Stormwater Utility - General Facilities Charge (GFC) Calculation Existing Cost Basis Total Notes PLANT-IN-SERVICE Utility Capital Assets 9,448,135$ Fixed Assets at Original Cost less: Contributed Capital (2,889,869) CIAC Additions at Original Cost plus: Interest on Non-Contributed Plant 1,077,638 Interest on assets up to a maximum 10-year period plus: 2011 Construction-Work-in-Progress 1,278,201 2011 Year-end Estimated Cash Balances 630,291$ $630,291 in Fund 411 only (No balance in Fund 412-200) less: Debt Principal Outstanding (2,408,066) Total principal outstanding for the existing debt at the end of 2011 less: Net Debt Principal Outstanding (1,777,775)$ Debt principal outstanding, net of cash reserves TOTAL EXISTING COST BASIS 7,136,330$ Future Cost Basis Notes CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Total Capital Improvement Program Cost 21,332,131$ Less: Projects to be Funded by Grants or Other Outside Sources (10,762,204) TOTAL FUTURE COST BASIS 10,569,927$ Planned Capital Improvements Project costs 2012 through 2017 Customer Base Notes Existing Equivalent Service Units 21,124 No of ESUs (2011) Future Equivalent Service Units (Incremental)1,026 Projected Incremental ESUs (2011 - 2030) TOTAL CUSTOMER BASE 22,150 No of ESUs (2030) Resulting Charge Notes Reimbursement Charge Component for Existing Assets Existing Cost Basis 7,136,330$ Total Customer Base 22,150 Reimbursement Charge 322$ Improvement Charge Component for Future Assets Future Cost Basis 10,569,927 Total Customer Base 22,150 Improvement Charge 477$ TOTAL GFC PER ESU 799$ Existing GFC per ESU 428$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 SW - GFC Page 5 of 5 Packet Page 87 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Customer Base Number of Accounts by Meter Sizes 3/4 " [a]1"1 1/2"2"3"4"6"8"TOTAL Single Family Residential 8,553 165 6 - - - - - 8,724 8,996 Apt., Multiple Unit, Condo 208 162 117 146 3 1 - - 637 2,439 Hotel, Motel, Trailer Parks 2 2 - 5 1 - - - 10 63 Nursing Homes 1 1 2 2 2 - - - 8 62 Commercial Buildings 116 61 31 20 2 2 - - 232 666 Laundry 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 Car Wash - - - 1 - - - - 1 8 Medical Office 1 1 - - - - - - 2 4 Hospital - 1 - 1 - - 1 - 3 61 Office Buildings 48 18 10 7 - 1 - - 84 224 Restaurant 24 10 10 1 - - - - 45 107 Service Station 2 4 - 1 - - - - 7 20 Supermarkets 2 2 2 - - - - - 6 17 Taverns 3 - - - - - - - 3 3 Other 3 3 - - - 2 1 - 9 111 City Accounts 39 10 9 17 2 2 2 - 81 427 Church 7 5 3 1 - - - - 16 43 School 1 1 1 1 6 3 - - 13 188 Fire Meter 3 - - 9 1 57 28 53 151 7,156 Sprinkler 77 31 12 8 2 1 - - 131 336 TOTAL 9,091 477 203 220 19 69 32 53 10,164 20,928 Meter Equivalency Factors 1.0 2.5 5.0 8.0 16.0 25.0 50.0 80.0 Meter Capacity Equivalents 9,091 1,193 1,015 1,760 304 1,725 1,600 4,240 20,928 [a] Includes one 5/8" meter and one unknown meter size account. Customer Classes Meter Capacity Equivalents PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - Customer Page 1 of 9 Packet Page 88 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Customer Base Year Customer Growth Rate [b] No of Total MEs No of MEs (Excl. Fire Meters & Sprinkler) 2011 20,928 13,436 2012 0.50%21,032 13,503 2013 0.50%21,137 13,571 2014 0.50%21,243 13,639 2015 0.50%21,349 13,707 2016 0.50%21,456 13,775 2017 0.50%21,563 13,844 2018 0.50%21,671 13,913 2019 0.50%21,779 13,983 2020 0.50%21,888 14,053 2021 0.50%21,998 14,123 2022 0.50%22,108 14,194 2023 0.50%22,218 14,265 2024 0.50%22,329 14,336 2025 0.50%22,441 14,408 2026 0.50%22,553 14,480 2027 0.50%22,666 14,552 2028 0.50%22,779 14,625 2029 0.50%22,893 14,698 2030 0.50%23,008 14,772 [b] Comprehensive Plan Update financial analysis projections. PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - Customer Page 2 of 9 Packet Page 89 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Plant in Service 2011 75 Yes MAINS BALANCE PRIOR 1961 12/1/1949 1949 270,215$ 219,885$ 50,330$ 10.00 5.00%135,108$ 64 FIVE CORNER TANK 1.5 MG 5/1/1960 1960 72,492$ 34,165$ 38,327$ 10.00 3.58%25,983$ 55 LAND FIVE CORNERS 12/31/1960 1960 10,123$ -$ 10,123$ 10.00 3.58%3,628$ 80 Yes MAINS COST UNIDENTIFIED 12/1/1964 1964 243,688$ 149,539$ 94,149$ 10.00 3.25%79,266$ 67 Yes SEATTLE TRANSMISSION MAINS W 6/21/1966 1966 135,521$ 80,556$ 54,965$ 10.00 3.90%52,848$ 217 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG ORIGINAL C 12/31/1967 1967 87,576$ 82,859$ 4,717$ 10.00 4.04%35,368$ 68 Yes PHASE I MAINS WS-2 3/19/1968 1968 444,714$ 252,832$ 191,882$ 10.00 4.58%203,865$ 69 Yes PHASE II MAINS WS-3 12/31/1968 1968 79,602$ 36,849$ 42,753$ 10.00 4.58%36,491$ 77 Yes MAIN REPLACEMENT WS-11 10/7/1970 1970 45,655$ 24,660$ 20,996$ 10.00 6.61%30,170$ 10 1970 ADDITIONS EASEMENTS 12/31/1970 1970 8,563$ -$ 8,563$ 10.00 6.61%5,659$ 78 Yes MAIN REPLACEMENT WS-12 6/23/1971 1971 10,917$ 5,761$ 5,155$ 10.00 5.69%6,212$ 73 Yes 9TH AVE MAIN WS-4 10/1/1971 1971 116,758$ 61,508$ 55,250$ 10.00 5.69%66,444$ 76 Yes MAIN REPLACEMENT WS-10 10/13/1972 1972 50,769$ 26,069$ 24,699$ 10.00 5.46%27,708$ 63 YOST PARK TANK 1.5 MG 4/5/1974 1974 245,698$ 119,951$ 125,746$ 10.00 6.44%158,289$ 74 YOST PARK TANK WATER MAINS 4/5/1974 1974 44,915$ 21,928$ 22,986$ 10.00 6.44%28,936$ 54 LAND-SEAVIEW TANK 12/31/1975 1975 36,500$ -$ 36,500$ 10.00 7.39%26,959$ 65 Yes SEAVIEW WATER TANK WATER MAI 12/31/1975 1975 52,596$ 24,884$ 27,712$ 10.00 7.39%38,847$ 218 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG ADDITION K 12/31/1975 1975 68,680$ 48,561$ 20,118$ 10.00 7.39%50,726$ 222 GEN PLANT IMPROVEMENTS UNKNO 12/31/1975 1975 9,738$ 9,738$ -$ 10.00 7.39%7,192$ 66 REPLACE 12 INCH BUTTERFLY VA 3/31/1976 1976 12,180$ 5,623$ 6,557$ 10.00 6.95%8,460$ 72 Yes PHASE 4 CITY WIDE MAINS 7/13/1976 1976 616,285$ 279,552$ 336,733$ 10.00 6.95%428,071$ 61 SEAVIEW TANK 1.5 MG 7/31/1976 1976 331,462$ 175,000$ 156,461$ 10.00 6.95%230,233$ 71 Yes PHASE III CITY WIDE MAINS 12/30/1978 1978 624,793$ 270,654$ 354,140$ 10.00 6.35%397,034$ 62 DEMOLITION COST 9TH AND MAIN 12/31/1978 1978 8,361$ 3,622$ 4,739$ 10.00 6.35%5,313$ 196 Yes FIRE MAINS 4 IN QUANTITY 12 12/31/1979 1979 10,514$ 6,685$ 3,829$ 10.00 6.81%7,162$ 197 Yes FIRE MAINS 6 IN QUANTITY 15 12/31/1979 1979 16,851$ 10,712$ 6,139$ 10.00 6.81%11,478$ 198 Yes FIRE MAINS 8 IN QUANTITY 33 12/31/1979 1979 44,648$ 28,419$ 16,229$ 10.00 6.81%30,413$ 214 4 1/2 IN FIRE HYDRANT COUNT 12/31/1979 1979 87,533$ 65,099$ 22,434$ 10.00 6.81%59,624$ 215 5 1/4 IN FIRE HYDRANT COUNT 12/31/1979 1979 100,205$ 73,543$ 26,662$ 10.00 6.81%68,255$ 219 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG REMODELING 12/31/1979 1979 24,678$ 15,503$ 9,175$ 10.00 6.81%16,810$ 220 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG MISC COSTS 1/1/1980 1980 68,463$ 50,696$ 17,767$ 10.00 9.05%61,927$ 2587 5 CORNER PUMP STATION STRUCT 6/30/1980 1980 202,992$ 202,992$ -$ 10.00 9.05%183,612$ 2588 5 CORNER PUMP STATION EQUIPM 6/30/1980 1980 81,281$ 81,281$ -$ 10.00 9.05%73,521$ 2589 YOST PK CHLORINATION FACILIT 6/30/1980 1980 51,040$ 51,040$ -$ 10.00 9.05%46,167$ 2591 5 CORNER 3.0 MG TANK LAND 6/30/1980 1980 30,625$ -$ 30,625$ 10.00 9.05%27,701$ 2633 5 CORNER 3.0 MG TANK 6/30/1980 1980 376,817$ 153,650$ 223,167$ 10.00 9.05%340,842$ 2785 Yes FIRE LINE 12/31/1980 1980 6,500$ 3,917$ 2,583$ 10.00 9.05%5,879$ 2786 Yes FIRE LINE 12/31/1980 1980 6,000$ 3,616$ 2,384$ 10.00 9.05%5,427$ 2830 Yes WATER MAINS PHASE 4 SEL E &12/31/1980 1980 546,981$ 217,891$ 329,090$ 10.00 9.05%494,760$ 2826 FIRE LINE DONATED 4/30/1981 1981 8,000$ 4,768$ 3,232$ 8,000$ 10.00 12.20%-$ 2918 6IN FIRE LINE DONATED 9/30/1981 1981 8,000$ 4,702$ 3,298$ 8,000$ 10.00 12.20%-$ 2827 Yes CITY WIDE WATER MAIN PH4 SCH 12/31/1981 1981 40,967$ 13,877$ 27,090$ 10.00 12.20%49,980$ 3023 Yes 5 CORNER TANK IMPROVEMENT 12/31/1981 1981 10,338$ 4,019$ 6,320$ 10.00 12.20%12,613$ 3031 WATER MAINS LID 207 12/31/1981 1981 20,979$ 8,154$ 12,825$ 20,979$ 10.00 12.20%-$ 3055 Yes WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT 12/31/1981 1981 13,029$ 5,065$ 7,964$ 10.00 12.20%15,895$ 3073 Yes 8IN FIRE LINE 3/31/1982 1982 5,500$ 3,178$ 2,322$ 10.00 12.40%6,820$ 3633 WATER MAIN LID 208 12/31/1982 1982 17,861$ 6,607$ 11,254$ 17,861$ 10.00 12.40%-$ 3796 Yes 4 INCH FIRE LINE 4/30/1983 1983 6,000$ 3,330$ 2,670$ 10.00 10.00%6,000$ 4144 Yes 8IN WATER MAIN 12/31/1983 1983 5,500$ 1,991$ 3,510$ 10.00 10.00%5,500$ 4185 WATER MAIN LID 209 12/31/1983 1983 8,665$ 3,137$ 5,528$ 8,665$ 10.00 10.00%-$ 4458 Yes FIRE LINE 10/31/1984 1984 9,500$ 4,998$ 4,502$ 10.00 10.50%9,975$ 4794 Yes PIERCE ARROW UNDERGROUND PIE 10/24/1985 1985 6,630$ 6,630$ -$ 10.00 9.60%6,365$ 4901 6 INCH FIRE LINE DONATED 4/30/1986 1986 6,000$ 2,977$ 3,023$ 6,000$ 10.00 7.80%-$ 5465 DONATED FIRE LINE 2/29/1988 1988 9,500$ 4,365$ 5,135$ 9,500$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5508 DONATED FIRE LINE 5/31/1988 1988 10,000$ 4,546$ 5,454$ 10,000$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5550 DONATED 4" METER 6/30/1988 1988 10,000$ 10,000$ -$ 10,000$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5551 DONATED FIRE LINE 6/30/1988 1988 10,000$ 4,529$ 5,471$ 10,000$ 10.00 8.00%-$ Asset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired CIACT&D Applicable Asset Age Applicable Interest Rate Allocable Interest Cost Original Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - Plant in Service Page 3 of 9Packet Page 90 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Plant in Service 2011 Asset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired CIACT&D Applicable Asset Age Applicable Interest Rate Allocable Interest Cost Original Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value 5564 DONATED FIRE LINE 7/31/1988 1988 10,000$ 4,512$ 5,488$ 10,000$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5623 Yes 8" WATERMAIN PIPE EXT(412 SH 9/30/1988 1988 14,749$ 4,406$ 10,344$ 10.00 8.00%11,800$ 5632 WATERMAIN LID 212 9/30/1988 1988 21,115$ 6,307$ 14,808$ 21,115$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5641 Yes 1985 WATER IMPROVEMENTS (412 9/30/1988 1988 27,424$ 8,191$ 19,233$ 10.00 8.00%21,939$ 5670 WATER MAIN LID211 10/31/1988 1988 11,567$ 3,442$ 8,125$ 11,567$ 10.00 8.00%-$ 5675 Yes DAYTON STREET RECONSTRUCTION 10/31/1988 1988 10,750$ 8,650$ 2,100$ 10.00 8.00%8,600$ 5804 CONTRIBUTED FIRE LINE 3/31/1989 1989 8,000$ 3,503$ 4,497$ 8,000$ 10.00 7.50%-$ 6333 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY LAND 5/11/1990 1990 846,790$ -$ 846,790$ 10.00 7.50%635,092$ 6362 Yes 1990 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT 12/31/1990 1990 402,653$ 323,372$ 79,281$ 10.00 7.50%301,990$ 6374 FIVE CORNERS DRAINAGE PROJEC 12/31/1990 1990 20,015$ 16,074$ 3,941$ 10.00 7.50%15,011$ 6378 Yes 1989 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT P 12/31/1990 1990 521,328$ 418,680$ 102,648$ 10.00 7.50%390,996$ 6412 AEREAL MAPPING - SHELL CREEK 12/31/1990 1990 28,675$ 23,029$ 5,646$ 10.00 7.50%21,506$ 6776 Yes 8" FIRE LINE 12/31/1991 1991 10,000$ 7,618$ 2,382$ 10.00 7.10%7,100$ 6778 MISC HYDRANTS 12/31/1991 1991 6,141$ 4,679$ 1,463$ 10.00 7.10%4,360$ 6809 Yes 8" FIRE LINE 1/7/1992 1992 10,000$ 3,774$ 6,226$ 10.00 6.60%6,600$ 6808 Yes 8" FIRE LINE 1/20/1992 1992 10,000$ 3,774$ 6,226$ 10.00 6.60%6,600$ 6795 5 CORNERS TAPPING PROJECT 2/7/1992 1992 6,750$ 5,057$ 1,693$ 10.00 6.60%4,455$ 6859 58 WATER ACCOUNTS PER ANNEXA 6/19/1992 1992 8,772$ 3,260$ 5,512$ 10.00 6.60%5,789$ 6896 Yes WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJEC 7/31/1992 1992 190,666$ 70,539$ 120,127$ 10.00 6.60%125,840$ 6927 POLICE MOBILE OFFICE INSTALL 7/31/1992 1992 9,183$ 6,794$ 2,390$ 10.00 6.60%6,061$ 6933 MISC. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS FOR 7/31/1992 1992 34,505$ 7,979$ 26,526$ 10.00 6.60%22,773$ 6983 CONTRIBUTED FIRE LINE - TOP 8/31/1992 1992 10,000$ 7,324$ 2,676$ 10,000$ 10.00 6.60%-$ 6999 CONTRIBUTED FIRE LINE 12/31/1992 1992 10,000$ 7,231$ 2,769$ 10,000$ 10.00 6.60%-$ 7231 ALUMINUM BUILD-A-BOX SHORING 6/23/1994 1994 13,457$ 13,457$ -$ 10.00 6.50%8,747$ 7330 SHELVING AND BINS 12/15/1994 1994 12,622$ 10,146$ 2,476$ 10.00 6.50%8,204$ 7349 METAL LOCKERS 12/29/1994 1994 9,896$ 7,955$ 1,941$ 10.00 6.50%6,432$ 7350 DATALINK FOR ANDERSON CENTER 12/29/1994 1994 6,086$ 3,914$ 2,172$ 10.00 6.50%3,956$ 7392 FUEL TANK REMOVAL 12/31/1994 1994 59,505$ 37,644$ 21,861$ 10.00 6.50%38,678$ 7393 Yes WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/1994 1994 20,754$ 13,315$ 7,439$ 10.00 6.50%13,490$ 7395 Yes 1993 WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/1994 1994 327,689$ 210,228$ 117,460$ 10.00 6.50%212,998$ 7396 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 12/31/1994 1994 144,991$ 93,019$ 51,972$ 10.00 6.50%94,244$ 7397 LID 213 WATER/SEWER IMPROVEM 12/31/1994 1994 874,046$ 519,386$ 354,660$ 874,046$ 10.00 6.50%-$ 7398 Yes 1992 WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS 12/31/1994 1994 276,694$ 177,512$ 99,182$ 10.00 6.50%179,851$ 7437 TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINK TO P 3/23/1995 1995 12,167$ 12,167$ -$ 10.00 6.20%7,543$ 7488 ANDERSON FRAMES, BEAMS,& CAN 5/25/1995 1995 6,651$ 6,651$ -$ 10.00 6.20%4,123$ 7513 1" WATER METER & SERVICE LIN 7/31/1995 1995 72,656$ 72,656$ -$ 10.00 6.20%45,047$ 7514 1 1/2" WATER METER & SERVICE 7/31/1995 1995 53,891$ 53,891$ -$ 10.00 6.20%33,412$ 7515 2" WATER METER & SERVICE LIN 7/31/1995 1995 114,518$ 114,518$ -$ 10.00 6.20%71,001$ 7516 3/4" WATER METER & SERVICE L 7/31/1995 1995 361,890$ 361,890$ -$ 10.00 6.20%224,372$ 7517 3" WATER METER & SERVICE LIN 7/31/1995 1995 20,122$ 13,752$ 6,370$ 10.00 6.20%12,476$ 7538 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 8/31/1995 1995 178,668$ 108,829$ 69,839$ 10.00 6.20%110,774$ 7539 Yes 1994 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT 8/31/1995 1995 405,697$ 250,104$ 155,593$ 10.00 6.20%251,532$ 7557 MANHOLES 48"8/31/1995 1995 8,827$ 5,432$ 3,395$ 10.00 6.20%5,473$ 7609 REMOTE READ METERS 12/6/1995 1995 5,288$ 3,190$ 2,098$ 10.00 6.20%3,279$ 7614 BORING TOOL - 4" MOLE 12/20/1995 1995 5,283$ 5,283$ -$ 10.00 6.20%3,275$ 7621 TRUCK-MOUNTED CRANES 12/20/1995 1995 11,100$ 11,100$ -$ 10.00 6.20%6,882$ 7639 CHARLSTON DONATED PROPERTY 12/29/1995 1995 43,773$ -$ 43,773$ 43,773$ 10.00 6.20%-$ 7638 Yes 1995 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT 12/31/1995 1995 1,160,558$ 640,585$ 519,973$ 10.00 6.20%719,546$ 7670 9-KUPFERLE SAMPLING STATIONS 2/8/1996 1996 6,315$ 3,760$ 2,555$ 10.00 6.00%3,789$ 7756 1996 WALTER TRAILER #78 SWR 9/12/1996 1996 6,716$ 6,716$ -$ 10.00 6.00%4,030$ 7846 CHERRY ST STORM DRAINAGE PRO 12/31/1996 1996 202,261$ 113,549$ 88,712$ 10.00 6.00%121,357$ 7850 PW FAC VACTOR DEWATERING STN 12/31/1996 1996 24,887$ 13,714$ 11,173$ 10.00 6.00%14,932$ 8009 5-CORNERS GENERATOR 12/31/1997 1997 45,305$ 19,673$ 25,632$ 10.00 5.80%26,277$ 8201 FOLDING/INSERTER MACHINE 2/18/1999 1999 10,084$ 10,084$ -$ 10.00 5.70%5,748$ 8243 ELECTRONIC CONTROL VALVE 4/29/1999 1999 12,261$ 12,261$ -$ 10.00 5.70%6,989$ 8287 REMODEL WATER/SEWER OFFICES 7/28/1999 1999 5,572$ 3,193$ 2,379$ 10.00 5.70%3,176$ 8381 WATER/SEWER TELEMETRY PROJEC 12/30/1999 1999 159,361$ 43,402$ 115,959$ 10.00 5.70%90,836$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - Plant in Service Page 4 of 9Packet Page 91 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Plant in Service 2011 Asset No Description Date Acquired Year Acquired CIACT&D Applicable Asset Age Applicable Interest Rate Allocable Interest Cost Original Cost Accumulated Depreciation Book Value 8383 Yes 1999 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT 12/30/1999 1999 164,688$ 44,853$ 119,835$ 10.00 5.70%93,872$ 8625 Yes 1999 WATERLINE PROJECTS 12/31/1999 1999 158,309$ 70,160$ 88,150$ 10.00 5.70%90,236$ 8369 COMPUTER SOFTWARE-VARIOUS 3/29/2000 2000 5,211$ 5,211$ -$ 10.00 6.00%3,127$ 8407 JET PLOTTER 8/10/2000 2000 9,889$ 9,889$ (0)$ 10.00 6.00%5,933$ 8455 METRO SWAP 8/31/2000 2000 28,344$ 28,344$ -$ 10.00 6.00%17,006$ 8420 ARC/INFO FLOATING LICENSE 9/27/2000 2000 12,157$ 12,157$ -$ 10.00 6.00%7,294$ 8426 2000 GO-4 #400 POL 11/21/2000 2000 21,150$ 21,150$ -$ 10.00 6.00%12,690$ 8438 HAMMONDS CHLORINATOR 12/31/2000 2000 9,611$ 9,611$ -$ 10.00 6.00%5,767$ 8487 RADIX METER READING SOFTWARE & HARDWARE 10/25/2001 2001 6,684$ 6,684$ -$ 10.00 5.50%3,676$ 8489 ROMAC VALVE EXERCISOR W/HYDRAULIC DRIVE 12/4/2001 2001 5,957$ 5,409$ 548$ 10.00 5.50%3,276$ 8498 COMPAQ WORKSTATION W/ARCINFO 12/31/2001 2001 13,000$ 13,000$ -$ 10.00 5.50%7,150$ 8635 WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12/31/2001 2001 342,573$ 124,420$ 218,153$ 10.00 5.50%188,415$ 8637 2001 WATER MAIN PROJECT 12/31/2001 2001 471,773$ 171,345$ 300,428$ 10.00 5.50%259,475$ 8644 ADMIRAL WAY SEWER REPLACEMENT 12/31/2002 2002 79,828$ 25,800$ 54,028$ 9.00 5.22%37,506$ 8582 RESERVOIR SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 11/13/2003 2003 13,590$ 9,639$ 3,951$ 8.00 4.75%5,162$ 8597 2002 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT 12/31/2003 2003 125,253$ 17,740$ 107,513$ 8.00 4.75%47,580$ 8672 2005 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 050-WTR 6/23/2005 2005 16,884$ 11,772$ 5,113$ 6.00 4.37%4,427$ 8684 2003 WATERMAIN PROJECT 12/31/2005 2005 1,122,827$ 228,173$ 894,654$ 6.00 4.37%294,405$ 8685 ALDER STREET WATER/SEWER 12/31/2005 2005 270,329$ 54,934$ 215,395$ 6.00 4.37%70,880$ 8731 2004 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT 12/31/2006 2006 1,018,600$ 163,402$ 855,198$ 5.00 4.40%224,134$ 8772 STORAGE AREA NETWORK DEVICE 11/26/2007 2007 8,821$ 3,990$ 4,830$ 4.00 4.40%1,551$ 8777 2005 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 12/31/2007 2007 1,678,757$ 106,153$ 1,572,604$ 4.00 4.40%295,182$ 8837 WATER DEPT GIS SYSTEM 12/31/2010 2010 7,859$ -$ 7,859$ 1.00 4.44%349$ 8850 2006 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT 12/31/2010 2010 35,922$ -$ 35,922$ 1.00 4.44%1,594$ 8851 2007 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJ 12/31/2010 2010 99,771$ -$ 99,771$ 1.00 4.44%4,427$ Total Plant-in-Service 18,125,858$ 8,061,119$ 10,064,738$ 1,097,505$ 9,259,633$ Pre-2000 City-Build Transmission & Distribution Assets 7,132,433$ 4,002,840$ 3,129,593$ -$ 4,613,321$ City's Water Main Replacement Program 1.00%per year thoughout the CIP period. Number of Years in the CIP period (2012 through 2029)18 years Amount of Water Mains to be Replaced in the CIP period 18.00%of the pre-2000 water mains. Estimated avg. original cost of water mains to be replaced & estimated interest 1,283,838$ 830,398$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - Plant in Service Page 5 of 9Packet Page 92 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Project Costs in Year: 2011 [NOTE: Capital Improvement Program costs are inflated]. CIP No Description % Growth 2012 - 2029 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-22 2023-29 2010 Replacement Program 234,003$ 234,003$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2011 Replacement Program 497,918 497,918 - - - - - 2012 Replacement Program 1,033,625 1,033,625 - - - - - 2012 Waterline Overlays 513,725 513,725 - - - - - 2013 Replacement Program 2,259,992 86,275 2,173,718 - - - - 2014 Replacement Program 2,259,996 - 86,275 2,173,722 - - - 2015 Replacement Program 2,259,968 - - 86,275 2,173,694 - - 2016 Replacement Program 2,259,951 - - - 86,275 2,173,677 - 2017 Replacement Program 2,259,977 - - - - 86,275 2,173,703 2018 Replacement Program 86,275 - - - - - 86,275 BNSF Crossings - - - - - - - PRV Station 11 Abandonment - - - - - - - PRV Station 12 Abandonment - - - - - - - System-wide Pressure Relief Improvements 475,012 - 225,019 249,993 - - - Annual PRV Station Improvement Program 625,051 - 125,000 124,996 124,982 125,036 125,036 Alderwood Meter, Seaview & Yost Improvements 6,275 6,275 - - - - - Five Corners Pump Station Improvements - - - - - - - Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir Recoating 629,967 - - - 629,967 - - Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir Recoating 399,998 - - - - 399,998 - Fire Hydrant Improvements, General Fund 575,975 95,980 95,965 95,991 95,959 96,040 96,040 76th Ave Waterline Replacement (includes PRV Impr)516,078 516,078 - - - - - Telemetry System Improvements 106,822 56,863 9,992 9,971 10,023 9,973 10,000 2010 Water System Plan Update - - - - - - - 2016 Water System Plan Update 150,047 - - - 75,042 75,005 - GFC Study 3,137 3,137 - - - - - - - - - - - - Transfer to Sewer Utility Fund 412-300 (Lift Station 2)101,471 101,471 - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Main St)126,471 126,471 - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Shell Valley)- - - - - - - Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Dayton Street)- - - - - - - - Projects Beyond 2017 (from Comp. Plan)- Annual Water Main Replacement Program (2017-22 total was $13,560,000)26,794,748 11,213,748 15,581,000 Annual PRV Station Improvements (2017-22 total was $750,000)624,964 624,964 Fire Hydrant Improvements (2017-22 total was $549,000)1,040,960 452,960 588,000 Telemetry System Improvements (2017-22 total was $300,000)360,000 290,000 70,000 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update 300,000 150,000 150,000 Total Capital Projects in Current Dollars 46,502,406$ 3,271,820$ 2,715,969$ 2,740,947$ 3,195,942$ 2,966,003$ 2,491,053$ 12,731,672$ 16,389,000$ Total Growth Related Project Costs - - - - - - - - - Total Repair & Replacement Project Costs 46,502,406 3,271,820 2,715,969 2,740,947 3,195,942 2,966,003 2,491,053 12,731,672 16,389,000 PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - CIP Page 6 of 9Packet Page 93 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Cumulative Construction Cost Inflation ==>2.00%6.08%10.32%14.74%19.33%24.10%29.06%34.23% Construction Cost Inflation ==> 2.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN INFLATED DOLLARS CIP No Description % Growth 2012 - 2017 TOTAL COSTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-22 2023-29 2010 Replacement Program 238,683$ 238,683$ 2011 Replacement Program 507,876 507,876 2012 Replacement Program 1,054,297 1,054,297 2012 Waterline Overlays 524,000 524,000 2013 Replacement Program 2,393,880 88,000 2,305,880 2014 Replacement Program 2,489,639 91,520 2,398,119 2015 Replacement Program 2,589,193 95,181 2,494,012 2016 Replacement Program 2,692,740 98,988 2,593,752 2017 Replacement Program 2,800,482 102,948 2,697,535 2018 Replacement Program 107,065 107,065 BNSF Crossings - PRV Station 11 Abandonment - PRV Station 12 Abandonment - System-wide Pressure Relief Improvements 514,500 238,700 275,800 Annual PRV Station Improvement Program 718,268 132,600 137,900 143,400 149,200 155,168 Alderwood Meter, Seaview & Yost Improvements 6,400 6,400 Five Corners Pump Station Improvements - Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir Recoating 722,800 722,800 Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir Recoating 477,300 477,300 Fire Hydrant Improvements, General Fund 649,484 97,900 101,800 105,900 110,100 114,600 119,184 76th Ave Waterline Replacement (includes PRV Impr)526,400 526,400 Telemetry System Improvements 115,410 58,000 10,600 11,000 11,500 11,900 12,410 2010 Water System Plan Update - 2016 Water System Plan Update 175,600 86,100 89,500 GFC Study 3,200 3,200 - Transfer to Sewer Utility Fund 412-300 (Lift Station 2)103,500 103,500 Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Main St)129,000 129,000 Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Shell Valley)- Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Dayton Street)- Total Capital Projects in Current Dollars 19,539,718$ 3,337,256$ 2,881,100$ 3,023,900$ 3,666,900$ 3,539,200$ 3,091,362$ -$ -$ Total Growth Related Project Costs - - - - - - - - - Total Repair & Replacement Project Costs 19,539,718 3,337,256 2,881,100 3,023,900 3,666,900 3,539,200 3,091,362 - - PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - CIP Page 7 of 9Packet Page 94 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility - General Facilities Charge (GFC) Calculation Existing Cost Basis Total Notes PLANT-IN-SERVICE Utility Capital Assets 18,125,858$ Fixed Assets at Original Cost less: Contributed Capital (1,097,505) CIAC Additions at Original Cost plus: Interest on Non-Contributed Plant 9,259,633 Interest on assets up to a maximum 10-year period less: Estimated avg. original cost of water mains to be replaced (1,283,838) less: Estimated interest on water mains to be replaced (830,398) plus: 2011 Construction-Work-in-Progress 4,187,575 2011 Year-end Estimated Cash Balances 1,224,913$ $1,224,913 in Fund 411 & ??? in Fund 412-100 less: Debt Principal Outstanding (1,498,350) Total principal outstanding for the existing debt at the end of 2011 less: Net Debt Principal Outstanding (273,437)$ Debt principal outstanding, net of cash reserves TOTAL EXISTING COST BASIS 28,087,888$ Future Cost Basis Notes CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Total Growth Related Projects -$ Total Existing (R&R) Related Costs 46,502,406 TOTAL FUTURE COST BASIS 46,502,406$ Planned Capital Improvements Project costs 2012 through 2029 Customer Base (excluding Fire & Sprinkler Meters)Notes Existing Equivalent Residential Units (Meter Equivalents)13,436 No of Meter Equivalents (2011) Future Equivalent Residential Units (Incremental)1,336 Projected Incremental Meter Equivalents (2011 - 2030) TOTAL CUSTOMER BASE 14,772 No of Meter Equivalents (2030) Resulting Charge Notes Reimbursement Charge Component for Existing Assets Existing Cost Basis 28,087,888$ Total Customer Base 14,772 Reimbursement Charge 1,901$ Improvement Charge Component for Future Assets Future Cost Basis 46,502,406 Total Customer Base 14,772 Improvement Charge 3,148$ TOTAL GFC PER METER EQUIVALENT 5,050$ PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - GFC (No Fire) Page 8 of 9 Packet Page 95 of 121 City of Edmonds General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis Water Utility - Existing and Calculated General Facilities Charges Meter Size 3/4 "1 5,050$ 908$ 1"2.5 12,624$ 2,270$ 1 1/2"5 25,248$ 4,540$ 2"8 40,397$ 7,264$ 3"16 80,794$ 14,528$ 4"25 126,240$ 22,700$ 6"50 252,480$ 45,400$ 8"80 403,968$ 72,640$ Meter Equivalency Factors Existing GFCsCalculated GFCs PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. (425) 867-1802 EDMONDS - GFC Analysis - November 14 2011 W - GFC Table Page 9 of 9 Packet Page 96 of 121 AM-4527 Item #: 3. M. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Pam Lemcke Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization to approve easements for the Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action Narrative The Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Project requires a permanent utility easement for Lift Station #4 and a temporary construction easement for Lift Station #9. Lift Station #4 is located on Talbot Road north of Olympic View Drive and Lift Station #9 is near Sierra Drive and 80th Ave W. The City has received signed easements from the property owners and is ready to record them. Attachment 1 is the permanent Utility Easement at 8403 Talbot Road and Attachment 2 is the Temporary Construction Easement at 8007 Sierra Drive. Attachments Attachment 1-Utility Easement Attachment 2-Temp Construction Easement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/06/2012 11:03 AM Public Works Phil Williams 02/07/2012 08:36 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2012 11:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/07/2012 12:39 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2012 01:19 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/01/2012 11:55 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2012 Packet Page 97 of 121 P a c k e t P a g e 9 8 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 9 9 o f 1 2 1 P a c k e t P a g e 1 0 0 o f 1 2 1 Packet Page 101 of 121 Packet Page 102 of 121 P a c k e t P a g e 1 0 3 o f 1 2 1 AM-4531 Item #: 3. N. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Approve for Consent Agenda Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization to advertise a Request for Bids for construction services for the Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action None. Narrative The Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvement Project will upgrade portions of the City’s Storm Drain Pipe system by installing approximately 530 linear feet of 12 and 30-inch storm drain pipe and associated appurtenances near the 8200 block of Talbot Road. The Project will focus on mitigating drainage issues around the construction area and help improve conveyance of stormwater flow. Construction is expected to start late spring of this year and be complete by fall 2012. The total estimated costs for this project is $500,000. The funding for this project comes from the 412-200 Stormwater Utility fund and was approved by Council in the 2012-2017 Capital Improvement Plan and the 2012 Capital Budget. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/06/2012 11:03 AM Public Works Phil Williams 02/07/2012 08:36 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2012 11:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/07/2012 12:38 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2012 01:19 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/01/2012 04:17 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2012 Packet Page 104 of 121 AM-4532 Item #: 3. O. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization to advertise, a Request for Bids, for construction services for the 76th Avenue W Waterline Installation Project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action On August 15, 2011, Council authorized Mayor to sign the Interlocal agreement with the City of Lynnwood. Narrative The 76th Avenue W Waterline Installation Project will upgrade/replace portions of the City’s potable water network by replacing approximately 2,000 linear feet of existing waterlines and associated appurtenances along 76th Avenue W from approximately 180th Street to 175th Street. The selection of the site was determined using the data supplied in the 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan dated December 2010, and because it coincided with the Sewer Main upgrade project that the City of Lynnwood will construct along the same project limits. An Interlocal Agreement was drafted and approved by the City of Lynnwood on October 6, 2011 and the City of Edmonds on October 17, 2011, so that the Waterline Installation Project can be done in conjunction with the City of Lynnwood as part of their Sewer Main replacement project. Construction is expected to start late spring of this year and be complete by fall 2012. The total estimated cost for the City of Edmonds’ portion of the work is estimated to be $550,000. The majority of funding for this project comes from the 412 Water Utility Fund. A General Fund Transfer will be required to fund the replacement and installation of new fire hydrants. The transfer will be funded by the 8.7% water utility tax that is collected by the General Fund for fire hydrant improvements. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/06/2012 11:30 AM Public Works Phil Williams 02/07/2012 08:36 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2012 11:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/07/2012 12:38 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2012 01:19 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/01/2012 04:31 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2012 Packet Page 105 of 121 Packet Page 106 of 121 AM-4533 Item #: 3. P. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Cruz Department:Engineering Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Authorization to advertise, a Request for Bids, for construction services for the 2012 Waterline Replacement Project. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 21, 2012 Council meeting. Previous Council Action None. Narrative The 2012 Waterline Replacement Project will upgrade/replace portions of the City’s potable water network by replacing over 3,000 linear feet of existing waterlines and associated appurtenances at various locations within the City. The selection of the sites was determined using the data supplied in the 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan dated December 2010, coordinating with upcoming road, sanitary sewer, and storm drain projects, and input from Public Works. Projects will focus on upsizing and/or looping portions of the existing network to improve flow and pressure and will remove and replace pipes that are near the end of their life cycle and are requiring additional maintenance. Construction is expected to start late spring of this year and be complete by fall 2012. The total estimated cost for this project is $1.05M. The majority of funding for this project comes from the 412 Water Utility Fund. A General Fund Transfer will be required to fund the replacement and installation of new fire hydrants. The transfer will be funded by the 8.7% water utility tax that is collected by the General Fund for fire hydrant improvements. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 02/06/2012 12:03 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/07/2012 08:36 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2012 11:32 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/07/2012 12:37 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2012 01:19 PM Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 02/01/2012 04:59 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2012 Packet Page 107 of 121 AM-4565 Item #: 4. A. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:15 Minutes Submitted For:Dave Earling Submitted By:Carolyn LaFave Department:Mayor's Office Committee:Public Safety Type:Action Information Subject Title Discussion regarding Human Resources temporary staffing proposal. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council approve proposal for additional expenditure authority to sufficiently cover the duties of the Human Resources Department as per discussions with the Mayor. Previous Council Action Narrative Attached is a proposal to cover the duties and responsibilities for the Human Resources department on a temporary basis. This proposal includes several components that will allow us to operate status quo, until such time as a permanent reorganization can be considered. This proposal includes retaining the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Director in an oversight capacity, and the HR analyst in an Acting Manager capacity. These two positions have been compensated for these additional duties in an " acting " capacity since September 22, 2011. In addition to these positions, this proposal adds a temporary file clerk for 10 hours per week, and a temporary HR assistant for 20 hours per week. Also included in this proposal is compensation for Ms. Tara Adams to complete Police Negotiations and two special projects she has been coordinating. We currently have an ordinance that was adopted last year by Council that allows for "acting " pay to be granted for a limited time of six months. Because of the unusual circumstances, I would also like to request that Council reconsider this policy to allow for the Mayor to approve "acting" pay for the length of time that is needed to reorganize operations. Attachments HR Proposal Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 03:37 PM Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 02/09/2012 03:26 PM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2012 Packet Page 108 of 121 Packet Page 109 of 121 AM-4555 Item #: 4. B. City Council Committee Meeting Date: 02/14/2012 Time:90 Minutes Submitted By:Carrie Hite Department:Parks and Recreation Review Committee: Public Safety/Personnel Committee Action: Type:Action Information Subject Title Citizens' Commission on Compensation of Elected Officials Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Personnel Commitee forward to Council for appointment of Council seat on Citizens' Commission. Previous Council Action Edmonds City Code Chapter 10.80 requires this process every even year. The last Council action on this was in 2010. Narrative This Commission is active every even year, by code. The Commissions' responsibility is to review all elected officials compensation and benefits, and make recommendations to City Council. The Commission consists of seven members: one Mayor's appointment, two Council appointments, and four Commission appointments. Currently, we have several Commissioners whose term is still active. These include the Mayoral seat appointment, a City Council seat appointment, and a Commission seat appointment. The Council process for this meeting is to interview all applicants, and the City Council appointee that is applying for a second term. These interviews will be 10-15 minutes in length. At the conclusion, staff is requesting the Personnel Committee make a reccomendation to the full Council for the Council seat appointment. After this person is appointed, he/she will be part of the process to appoint the remainder Commission seats. Once the Commission is fully seated, they will be meeting throughout the months of March and April to consider reccomendations for the Council/Mayor/Judge compensation. Attached you will find Interview questions, applications for all new citizens seeking a seat on the Commission, and an updated resume from the current Council appointee seeking a second term. Attachments Interview Questions Anderson Reappointment Resume Rosenfelt Packet Page 110 of 121 Rosenfelt Gatjens Hunter Ayers Radcliffe Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2012 04:41 PM Mayor Dave Earling 02/10/2012 09:17 AM Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2012 09:29 AM Form Started By: Carrie Hite Started On: 02/08/2012 12:45 PM Final Approval Date: 02/10/2012 Packet Page 111 of 121 CITIZENS COMMISSION ON COMPENSATION OF ELECTED OFFICIALS Interview Questions February 2012 1. Thank you for your application and interest. Can you please explain your reasons for wanting to serve on the Citizens’ Commission for Compensation of Elected Officials? 2. Can you please describe your experience and qualifications as they relate to this position appointment? 3. After hearing the brief summary of the Commission’s duties, do you have any reason to believe that you would be unable to fulfill the requirements of the position? 4. What is your availability during the day, or any evenings of the week? Packet Page 112 of 121 Packet Page 113 of 121 Packet Page 114 of 121 Packet Page 115 of 121 Packet Page 116 of 121 Packet Page 117 of 121 Packet Page 118 of 121 Packet Page 119 of 121 Packet Page 120 of 121 Packet Page 121 of 121