10307 238TH ST SW.pdf1, ROLL CALL
Present
Jeff Oaklief Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Shirley Frank John Bissell, .Associate Planner
Craig Pierce Lynne Hann, Deputy City Clerk
James Young
2. CORRESPONDENCE/iCOMMENIS ER nM STAFF
John Bissell stated that resumes of individuals who are interested in serving on the ADB would be reviewed at the
end of the meeting.
3. ARUCHITEC.TURAL DESIGN ]BOARD COMMEND
None.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
BOARDMEMBER YOUNG MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER FRANK, TO APPROVE
THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 7,1996, AS SUBMITTED. MOTION CARRIED.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
BOARDMEMBER FRANK MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER YOUNG, TO APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA, CONSISTING OF ADB-95-94, AS SUBMITTED. MOTION
CARRIED.
6. AGENDA
ADB=9:6-1'X <ir REMODEL AND ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB
Klahaya Swim and Tennis Club
10317 238th St. SW
Edmonds, WA 98020
(Final Approval)
Bill Walker, 11000 Whitcomb Place, Woodway and Carla Nichols, 22440 Dogwood Lane, Woodway, members of
the Klahaya Swim and Tennis Club Board of Directors, were present.
John Bissell presented the staff report. This is an existing facility, located in a newly annexed area of the City, with
a flat roof and a store front -type door entry located to the west of the center of the building. The project includes
the addition of a more distinct entry, as well as the addition of approximately 250 square feet on the south side of
the building to be used as a lobby area. The proposal includes raising the roof in the area of the entry, with
storefront glass windows added around the entry door. Columns for each side of the door, with an exposed
aluminum roof frame, are also proposed. The building will be painted a salmon color with teal trim.
Mr. Bissell explained that since the proposal is supported by ADB design criteria and the design related policies in
the Comprehensive Plan, staff is recommending approval.
There were no audience comments on this project.
Boardmembers concurred that this remodel will improve the existing facility, and had no objections or concerns.
IT WAS MOVED BY BOARDMEMBER FRANK, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER PIERCE, }
TO APPROVE ADB-96-17 AS SUBMITTED, WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT i.
OBTAIN A CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT. MOTION CARRIED. t
7. DISCUSSION .OF ITEMS A M-YED BY STAFF VVIITH ADB APPROVAL.
Boardmembers discussed the types of issues which should be approved by staff, and provided suggestions to staff
on the types of items which should be brought before the ADB for review.
Rob Chave, Planning Manager explained the effects of Regulatory Reform and asked the Boardmembers for
suggestions regarding their continuing role, in view of the changes which will be made as a result of this legislation.
Following a lengthy discussion, Boardmembers concurred that their were two options regarding their future role in
the planning process which could be considered.
Option No. I would include meetings once per month, with emphasis placed on project review duties, as well as
participation in proactive programs such as design awards, education, focus groups and community outreach.
Option No. 2 would include multiple Board meetings each month, joint hearings with the Hearing Examiner on joint
projects and would place emphasis on project review duties.
Rob Chave stated that he would take these recommendations to the Planning Board to be considered at their
upcoming retreat. He explained that the City Council has the ultimate authority over the duties and responsibilities
of the Architectural Design Board.
Boardmembers reviewed resumes submitted by those individuals interested in serving on the Architectural Design
Board.
BOARDMEMBER PIERCE MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER YOUNG TO
NOMINATE LINDA GOODRICH TO SERVE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD.
MOTION CARRIED.
BOARDMEMBER FRANK MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER PIERCE TO ADJOURN
THE MEETING AT 10:06 P.M. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Architectural Design Board Meeting
Page 2 March 6, 1996
E. Summary: Staff believes that the Architectural Design Review Board can find that the
proposal is supported by the ADB design criteria and the design related policies in the
Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff recommends the Architectural Design Board approve
this proposal.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Applicant's declarations, elevations and site plan
11
m
C
Y,
J
G
A14u�lYYaYA
�-
wOw'i.r.V.atalt
..
v
anawa
t
c'
y
YaNHn01eBW
; \\
OwtliY18M'A'
..
OrbfabrtA'
liouUfe6dc8'
-
\\ ;
6pIfHBock OYq
�iYrN%k
'.MQ4bFd1&p
lf4UWEM BNB
rewiY.mlc
�,y�p,,,,,'w wYen
.mttytfsoenu
SOUTH ELEVATION
lmYtrWwAiYf
bN+�M.sWW
Wtlm6tlia YagYwMt
lWW1Y 1tlE
-
114'. tW
Wpr.Yarrrprwwr.4
KLAHAVA SYROM CLUB
Ground Face Block 'A'
Ground Face Block 'B'
'plit Face Block,
saint)
Exist Bldg.
xist. diamond
face of blocks
J)
6" Split Face Block,
(exterior face only), paint
Colored alum.
,/' III'.
Storefront System this elevation
to be single pane, clear glass,
clear anod. alum, except Co noted,
(All glass lam. safety glass this elev.).
rauwedrmaa \ rcxAuw E4mmao
M1c�dW b
a•Y{Q Yaq (hc�C (f'm^�6w"Spam 14 we a"RpCl Fny -
A" -(*A,.. (aQ1tMpM DlMdrlaw�. � hW/am hes aM/; pot
IIII d—a"WuLt ww1.64
city of eCnonds
land use amlication
I ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
Ck3 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT
0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
13 HOME OCCUPATION
0 FORMAL SUBDIVISION
E3 SHORT SUBDIVISION
E3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
U PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
E3 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT
STREET VACATION
E3 REZONE
Ll SHORELINE PERMIT
E3 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE
EXCEPTION
E3 OTHER
FILE # �1-1 ZONE R5 -15
DATE 2 9 04 6 RECDBY
___J
FEE RECEIIPT#
HEARING DATE ;I�A�
L3 HE E3 STAFF El PB ?tADB Q CC
ACTION TAKEN:
APPEAL#
Applicant W�LU� -Phone 774—'5�"3S,,
�' VEVW0,AM
Property Address or Location 1C)5e-_Q -S.L&-
Property Owner 45tk3nk +� t_V3%S CUU115 Phone 6�7y —__t577__
Address IMPekk- e78OZ40
Agent (A-)% LU I&Ak i Ak,�-� —Phone -774- — 5�10S2D
Address I(C)00
Tax Acc# C;09 -CXQC)_7_ Sec. TwD. Rng.
Legal Description ::tJAr-_, Vmac" !L-z.. Z=E-- ftlirr--= Wes'
Details of Projector Proposed Us- �/_4�a 17"C�A A-t-XC>
The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the
application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all
damages, including reasonable attorneys fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon
false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or
employees. J,
4n
The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officia diie S
pii f- 'or Ci 7ty of E s to
d
n
't
enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attqfi2�aa6t
io
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/
0
e "Ar
>�
aaarAm
arc
- �oaw�orw•
aarauoa
{
1
amiumcau
m
R
i
Jl=.a.
z
WWWAOa
t
t
r
v.
e� w kaw.W*/
-
� mmwo}
Oft %vik"s
alkodAm
.
V
GWWFaea Olxk A'
\\
amwdFw.*Va tA'
w
JJ_
J ♦
_
- C*Wd Fa 6/xkr
OdMfs'a fbdtO'
.
- - .
_
4NF"Bkck.
♦\ j
S)7t Fera 9nck fylkl)
-
Uww1_
oeaAJI.Fl ram
rauk eawsna
-
- (ranaaadw.Axnru
-
P heo of Meb
-
- w wa Faw Hk.lt
S3aetrdC bydam Cdt aMrothn
k' RFq Faro lyxA
. (wea1bt face oe!/), pa►Y
-
b H skoe pom dar paa,
isdwfar hea ar►R. PM
-
0% owe M- awwy pba RL aW.y,
x'
Ground Face Block 'A'
Ground Face Block'B'
&0
i V010
;plit Face Block,
oaint)
Exist Bldg. -1
xist. diamond
face of blocks
J)
Colored alum.
6" Split Face Block, J Storefront System this elevation
(exterior face only), paint to be single pane, clear glass,
clear anod. alum. except as noted,
(All glass [am. safety glass this elev.).
Ground Face
Gri
60 Split Fe
(exterior f