The URL can be used to link to this page

10319 244TH ST SW.PDF111111111111 4703 10319 244TH ST SW 051 q- �q TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: X BUILDING PERMIT (NEW COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS: �� DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: V-D3--fi' DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $ SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) SOILS REPORT DATED: Z ' O, STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT # WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LID BLOCK: 694,^e4s 6e-40kdy1b*1 LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc F, I L APPROVED AS NOTED BY�=41NIGI Date: -.--7tbInd w5pEccwt-, C� 6COWC-wo To re-;X%c,.-tW6% -ftWS� GUTTERS! DOWNSPOJTS To CONNECT TO . EX'ST- SYST' 1765 sq.ft. (1st floor) D +96' +70 +75 +80 +85 +90 111 -05 +95 C +96.5' 685 sq. ft. (garage) +100 183 ft 155 ft DATUM PT. +100 Garage Floor +105 LOT COVERAGE: 2598 sq. ft. (11.25%) RECEIVE:1) LOT AREA: UN 3 2004 23,087 sq.ft. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. Tax Account Parcel # CITY OF EDMONDS ,. 27 0336 003 03500 1D)?A1WK6q.F-- x Y Y Y a A. 9 s "s a 'd1DW 10731 10725 m bta.'S "^'SG Y A Y Y c� ty3 fY }y a`4 ' alsa:las4 S 2w,o 0 8 tl 8 >3 0 4y a 6 d f3 B t0 704 10710 _,yOTTHPL.W 10713 IIN 10?04 v 1 •-"y 10707 u . iyyi 0 10707 lam O 1 10701 � 10e20 p` ,oers I 10627 w I5 �id 10620 w 108TH PL loe,e ` 10625 1oe,e Q$ ,.�•; e�Q 8 g 10e10 foeoe 8 t0e11 `V • 1 toe05 10e12 g � 1oe15 O^sj1 loeoo ,oeo2 ,oxn ,oast �p 10e01 N \ I : + ° v m ,OeoY 10526 A A !rt '� 10531 C . 1060e �` ♦ (n a 10321 ,OeO, 105I7 tom S9 el>r� `1' 6 T a o`cp -- 3 067HAVEw 10a1e V ,om O 3. _ lode •: '; .. P.' � 7 A• 10522 10525 ..1 10517 � loeu O 47 • lose /^��' ggg TCL loses 0) �` V V 10508 ios17 /0a06 3 rn 10432 6 y P-11- `� t 10503 10429 n 1 O • 10418 0 i 041H AVE W _ 104TH AVE w 24131 24123 Y 1037A /0323 23727 �Qpj u 10313 I0012 1031e '03" o v 10316 /0316 v o ' Q y g 7 $ 10307 o 1030e iS 23023 10310 10307 '03" Klahaya Pool Y T Faith Community 23,E 2378 t3 43 i(L} ChufCh o e 1021 ; : Cv . M ld aNm loz2, 23912 z,els 10220 102N^ to 23719 23610 (,} 10214 , 102 24127 - 10213 239/ 1 N fig{ _• 10215 � � � v 23e14 pps 10207 iY¢S 102D6 .. .. 10203 10132 lo202 10203 ' , pl 10201 10202 10133 • ,�O ?o, u qV' 10124 + 10120 10126 10129 � 4t g P3 $ g 10125 10120 1013/ 1012e 10127 )A 1013T AVE W � 10116 10121 10120 �� 10121 .920 � 101 $T PLW 10121 2371e 23702 10120 � lone 8 lobe g 19T AVEW tot1, lono 1010, 101STPLW 1�tST:PL.W .. : 10102 10103 tOlOx 10102 IgSI po .d g b N $pa 1002e 10026 I0020 O 1002e 1 O 10031 23e25 " Xg tODte 1001e S' 10023 8 ° boss loose N Ya � 21630 tO13TAVE W - . 1 7$f 2lzoe 2Al2e a , 23e29 q �{/ � g pp qq pp o 8 N 8 8 s 8 g e ?1 �' 24127 .y+ S• PIRDALE AVE. .. 23614 236 1001}{AyEw 10420 "I t3 - - 0 Cornerstone 17625-130t" Ave. NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 G eotech n ica1 1 nc. Phone: 425-844-19 Fax: 425-844-1987 7 December 19, 2003 Mr. Phil Korpi 10319 — 244' Street SW Edmonds, Washington 98020 Shed/Slope Evaluation 10319 — 244`h Street SW Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 1569 Dear Mr. Korpi: INTRODUCTION STREET BILE F?E:CE'VEE® JAN 2 6 2004 PERMIT COUNTED This letter presents our evaluation of the surficial conditions of the slope located adjacent to a shed at your residence located at 10319 — 244`h Street SW in Edmonds, Washington. You have informed us that the shed was constructed two years ago, and that it measures slightly over 10 feet by 12 feet, the maximum sized structure allowed by the City of Edmonds to be constructed without permitting. The shed is not utilized as sleeping space. The top of a steep slope is located a short distance from the shed. You have informed us that the City of Edmonds has required that a geotechnical engineer evaluate the slope and the suitability of the shed location. For our use in preparing this letter, you have provided us with a copy of a site plan showing the location of the shed and the nearby residence, as well as site topography. OBSERVATIONS AND EXPECTED CONDITIONS We visited the site on December 16, 2003, and observed the existing conditions. The shed is supported on precast concrete pier blocks bearing on soil a few inches below the ground surface. The structure is located three to five feet from the top of a steep slope. The residence on the site is located a similar distance from the top of the slope. You have informed us that the residence was constructed 18 years ago, and that you have not observed indications of slope instability at the site. Slope Evaluation • 10319 — 244`h Street SW Edmonds, Washington December 19, 2003 CG File No. 1569 Page 2 The upper portion of the slope below the shed has a height of about 20 feet and an inclination as steep as 28 degrees, as measured with a hand-held clinometer. The lower portion of the slope has a height of about 10 feet and an inclination of about 45 degrees. This steeper portion of the slope appears to be the result of a cut for the road which is located at the bottom of the slope. The slope is vegetated with mature straight evergreen trees and brush. A downspout connected to the shed gutter discharged water onto the steep slope. We did not observe either seepage or indications of instability on the slope. We evaluated the surface of the steep slope with a ''/z- inch diameter steel probe. Using moderate effort the ground surface could be probed one to two feet before firm soil was encountered. The Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles Snohomish and King Counties, Washington, by Mackey Smith (Washington Department of Natural Resources, 1975) was referenced for the geologic conditions at the site. The site is mapped as glacial till, consisting of a dense unsorted mixture of clay, silt, sand, and gravel. CONCLUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In our opinion, the location of the shed is suitable for the structure. We did not observe indications of instability on the slope. Based on our surficial observations and the referenced geologic map, the core of the slope consists of dense materials that are considered stable with respect to deep-seated slope failures. However, there is potential for minor sloughing on the slope. These types of occurrences can be minimized by directing water away from the surface of the slope. The shed is supported on precast concrete pier blocks that would allow the shed to be releveled in the event that it is affected by minor ground movement or settlement. The homeowner should monitor the slope below the shed for instability, especially after periods of heavy rainfall. Of great importance to the long-term stability of the slope is the control of surface and near -surface water, and erosion protection. We recommend that the roof drain be directed away from the top of slope and either tightlined to the bottom of the slop or directed away from the slope. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Slope Evaluation 10319 - 240 Street SW Edmonds, Washington December 19, 2003 CG File No. 1569 Page 3 • -• Closure Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our work, we have strived to take care that our work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions'conceming this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Thor Christensen, PE Project Engineer 530 -lq- 03 FCISTBR� L ASSIONAL71r66N EXPIRES Q$ / 16 / Rick B. Powell, PE Principal Engineer RBP:TRC:sh Three Copies Submitted Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. City 0 dmOiidS " Development Services Department Planning Division ' Phone: 425.771,0220 Cate ReceiM -3- ✓/- 03 City,Receipt #: o9/ 17/(0 .Critical Areas File*:` Critical Areas Checklist. Fee.: 45.00 Fax. 425.771.0221, • , . : I ; Date Mailed to'Applcant:I. The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing- a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior -to, his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be • easily . available from observations of the site or data available -it City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or , soil surveys). A property. owner, or his/her authorized representative, -must- fill out the checklist, sign and'date it, andsubmit it to the City. The City will review .the checklist, . make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the 'subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the: signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this"`form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography `.map, etc.) or studies in. conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in. consideration on the processing of.the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or. part upon false, misleading, . inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this applications onthebehalf fooff the�owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT " DATE a 3 Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply, for the subject land use, application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the-staffofthe City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER/�.� ' r "1i" DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: &1c. iKW t Name l03lq�-�Y�+� �� sti✓ Street Address �PIVV w+ gY02� City 9tate Zip Telephone: 2di Lf �" d~ 2--/ ,.-/ Email address (optional): WXNOM�� Name, Street Address City; . State; Zip Telephone: Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 O CITY OF EDMONDS 16 CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION Site Location: 10319 — 244t' St SW Tax Acct. Number: 27 0336 003 03500 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-03-34 Applicant: Phil Korpi Owner: Phil Korpi CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-03-34) During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain a Steep Slope Hazard Area, pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.15B.060A3c. A Critical Areas Study will be required to delineate the boundaries of the critical area, buffers, and setbacks. STUDY REQUIREMENT — STEEP SLOPE HAZARD AREA Prior to submission of any development permit, you will be required satisfy the requirements of the Critical Areas Chapter 20.156 by completing the following Steep Slope Hazard Area Delineation Requirements: 1. A topographic survey must be prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor to i delineate any Steep Slope Hazard Areas. i A steep slope hazard areas is defined by ECDC 20.15B.060 as ground that rises at an inclination of 40% or greater within at least 20 feet of elevation change. In order to delineate a steep slope hazard area, it is necessary to locate the top and toe of the slope. The inclination of the slope is established by averaging the inclination over at least 20 feet of vertical relief. A 50 foot wide buffer plus a 15-foot building setback will be required from both the top and the toe of the steep slope hazard area. Refer to ECDC 20.15B.080C and 20.15B.110A. 2. In order to complete the Study Requirement, a map must be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ON A SITE WITH STEEP SLOPE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within the Steep Slope Hazard Area, its buffer, and/or building setback. If development must occur within these areas, the applicant may pursue certain processes provided in the Critical Areas Chapter of the Edmonds Community Development Code. The applicable process depends on the specific development proposal and site but may include one of the following: Buffer Reduction. For development proposals within 65-feet (50-foot buffer plus 15-foot building setback), but no closer than 25 feet (10-foot buffer plus a 15-foot building setback) from the top or toe of the slope, the 50-foot buffer requirement may be reduced to 10 feet if a study is completed by a licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer. The study must clearly demonstrate that the proposed buffer alteration will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public, or any private party. Essentially, development could be allos as close as 25 feet from the top A of the slope. The 15-foot building setback always applies no matter how much the buffer is reduced. Refer to ECDC 20.15B.110A. Steep Slope Exemption, Critical Areas Variance, or Reasonable Use Exception. Development proposals closer than 25 feet from the top or toe of the slope may be allowed through the approval of a steep slope exception, critical areas variance, and/or a reasonable use exception. These Land Use Permits that must be obtained through the Planning Division. Refer to ECDC 20.1513.110D2, 20.1513170A, and 20.1513.040C. PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL WAIVERS If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued. on a project by project basis. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements. Refer to ECDC 20.1513.040. T Name Sign If you need additional information, please contact a Planner. Date Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 NSON CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKEMAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Ih o 1890 Planning • Building • Engineering September 8, 2008 Karl F. and Susanne A. Johnson 10319 244`11 Street SW Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Illegal Discharge into Storm System Dear Karl F. and Susanne A. Johnson: Our records indicate that you are the owners of the property at 10319-244"' Street SW. It has been brought to my attention that a drainage pipe from your property directs runoff to the steep bank behind your home. Discharge from this drainage pipe is causing erosion of the bank and is transporting sediment onto 104"' Avenue West, where it is washed into the City's storm drainage system. The discharge of any substance other than rainwater into the municipal storm drainage system or waters of the State constitutes a violation of Edmonds City Code 7.200 entitled Illegal Discharges to Storm Water System and Watercourses and is subject to enforcement actions. Payment of a fine of up to $500 per day to cover administrative and remediation costs associated with this violation is authorized in accordance with Edmonds City Code 7.200.150. To avoid potentially paying fines, it is recommend that you prevent water from discharging from this system that washes sediment or other unwanted materials into the City's storm drainage system. Your immediate attention to this matter is greatly needed. The rainy season is right around the corner. If you have any questions regarding this urgent matter, please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1323 or Mike Johnson at 425-771-0235, Ext. 1640. Shuster, P.E. ,water Engineering Program Manager JS/cmc SAENGR\Ston Engineer\Illicit Discharges\2008\10319 244th St. SW.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • • u CITY OF EDMONDS 121- 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: Ron McConnell, Hearing Examiner From: RECEIVED Kathleen Wr Project Planner JAN 2 6 2004 Date: AUGUST 28, 2003 PERMIT COUNTER File: V-2003-87 PHIL KORPI Hearing Date, Time, and Place: September 4, 2003, At 9:30 AM, Third Floor, Room 304 Edmonds City Hall 121— 5`h Avenue N. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2 A. APPLICATION..................................................................................................................................... 2 B. RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................................................2 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................2 A. SITE DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................. 2 B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SE PA) .................................................................................. 3 C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE .............................................. 3 D. TECHNICAL COMMn-PEE.................................................................................................................... 3 E. PUBLIC COMMENTS...........................................................:...............................................................4 III. RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS.........................................................................4 A. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION...................................................................................................... 4 B. APPEALS............................................................................................................................................ 4 C. TAME LIMITS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS.......................................................................... 4 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL......................................................................:............................4 V. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR...............................................................................4 VI. APPENDICES.....................................................................................................................5 VII. PARTIES OF RECORD...................................................................................................5 V-2003-87SR / August 28, 2003 / Staff Report • • Phil Kmpi File No. V-2003-87 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION A. Application I. Applicant: Phil Korpi (see Attachment 2). 2. Site Location: 10319 — 240 St SW (see Attachment 1). 3. Requests: Critical areas variance to encroach into a steep slope buffer and building setback. The applicant has constructed a shed at the top of the slope. The building footprint is approximately 120 square feet. 4. Review Process: Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. 5. Major Issues: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Development Standards). b. Compliance with ECDC Section 20.15B.170 (CRITICAL AREAS VARIANCE) B. Recommendations Based on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report we recommend APPROVAL of the requested critical areas variance with the following conditions: 1. A soils report must accompany the building permit application. It must demonstrate that slope stability. 2. The downspouts for the shed must be tied into the drainage system for the house. 3. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 4. The applicant must obtain a building permit prior to any construction. 5. The approved critical areas variance must be acted on by the owner within one year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration and the city approves the application. Only one one-year extension is possible. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Site Description 1. Site Development and Zoning: a) Facts: (1) Size: The subject property is approximately 23,000 square feet. (2) Land Use: The subject property is developed with a single-family.residence, sport court, and detached studio. (3) Zoning: The subject property and surrounding areas are zoned single family residential, RS-8, minimum lot size 8,000 square feet. See Attachment 1. (4) Terrain: The property slopes downward from east to west. The steepest portion is on the western side of the lot. 2. Neighboring Development and Zoning: a) Fact: The surrounding properties are zoned and developed as single-family residences. b) Conclusion: The proposed development is single-family in nature and therefore consistent with the surrounding zoning and development. V-2003-87SR/ August 28, 2003 / Staff Report • • Phil 7 File No. V-2003-803-87 Page 3 of 5 B. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 1. Fact: The proposal does not require SEPA review. 2. Conclusion: The applicant and City has complied with SEPA regulations. C. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance 1. Zoning Standards a) Facts: (1) The site development standards for RS-8 are as follows: front setback-25 feet, rear setback-15 feet, and side setbacks-7.5 feet. b) Conclusion: (1) The proposal complies with the development standards. 2. Compliance with requirement for a Critical Areas Variance for a Steep Slope a) Facts: (1) Decisional criteria as set forth in ECDC 20.15B.170 (a) Special circumstances must exist. (b) The proposal shall be the minimum necessary, will not be detrimental to the public or injurious to neighboring properties, etc. Refer to ECDC 20.15B.170. (2) Applicant's responses (See Attachment 3) (3) Additional information: (a) The lot was developed prior to annexation to the city and prior to critical areas regulations. The original site topography is shown.on page 2 of Attachment 4. (b) According to the site plan, the top of the slope appears to be along the 95a' topographic line. (c) The shed is located at the top of the slope. See Attachment 4. (4) Staff response: (a) Special circumstances exist in the lot's topography. Because of the slope of the lot, there are limits to where the property is actually usable. (b) The development appears to be the minimum necessary. The building is only 120 square feet in size. (c) The development should not be detrimental. However, the applicant should confirm this with a soils report to be submitted with the building permit application. Refer to recommended condition # 1. (5) Conclusion: Staff recommends approval of the critical areas variance, subject to the recommended conditions on page 2. D. " Technical Committee 1. Review by City Departments: The application has been reviewed and evaluated by the Fire Department, Public Works Department, Parks & Recreation Department, and Engineering Division. Comments were received from the Public Works Department. See Attachment 6. V-2003-87SR/ August 28, 2003 / Staff Report • Phil 7 File No. V-2003-803-87 Page 4 of 5 E. Public Comments 1. No public comments have been submitted. III. RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. A. Request for Reconsideration Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. B. Appeals Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the decision being appealed. C. Time Limits for Reconsideration and Appeals The time limits for Reconsideration and Appeals run concurrently. If a request for a reconsideration is filed before the time limit for filing an appeal has expired, the time clock for filing an appeal is stopped until a decision on the reconsideration request is completed. Once the Hearing Examiner has issued his decision on the reconsideration request, the time clock for filing an appeal continues from the point it was stopped. For example, if a reconsideration request is filed on day 5 of the appeal period, an individual would have 9 more days in which to file an appeal after the Hearing Examiner issues his decision on the reconsideration request. IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the variance shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.' V. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office V-2003-87SR/ August 28, 2003 / Staff Report C� J • Phil Kmpi File No. V-2003-87 Page 5 of 5 VI. APPENDICES Attachments 1 through 5: 1.. Vicinity Map 2. Application 3. Declaration for Critical Areas Variance 4. Site Plans 5. Elevation Views VII. PARTIES OF RECORD Phil Korpi 10319 — 244'h St SW Edmonds, WA 98020 Engineering Division Public Works Department Building Division Planning Division Fire Department V-2003-87SW August 28, 2003 / Staff Report .. � � • - r, � .� .. .� � rA: ' .� •, .:v. fir 4'� Ile N vw �✓IA m 164z - A nr. sw-A f'i"s) wA- °4Sri ?3 RECEIVED JUN 1 7 2003 PERMIT COUNTER IJ In :r • I ,III' ` �� / � ��# ->-,!- / • .. � I . a p�i��yO. � • �' � �•. Mf,�,, �. �" !`j'.,�a �,.4 •� N•lf3►...Y. �•,a� � � '.. �� •. L fa . r •.~!. 1� •,• ..... .�,) s� � an,rt�±� !"�'��L� _ ". A il,�•,{�rd,l��}'.:.•..i.'3.r . .._"��.:' .�: SAS:'':.._. APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE : V-03-87 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING aJ"m W ROUTED TO: Engineering 6/24/03 Fire 03 Parks b Rec. 6/24/03 Building N/A Community Svcs N/A Staff Comments: RETURNEGI//n/,- Engineering E0 JUN 2 5 20"1 Fire rveL,U jj!r)9KS Public Works'1'�,c1,t, — Parks A Rec. Building JUG Community Svcs_ fro._ --- ills cam ur ► i SECTION*PER WHAT OF •D *Additional Information Required for Complete Application • Owner: KORPI, PHIL • Property Address: 10319 244t' St. SW • Date of Application: 6/18/03 • Type: Critical Areas Variance • Meeting Required: Yes X No Date of Meeting • Planning Contact:_ Star Camabell X Application X Fee X APO List Recording Fee 03-34 Critical Areas Determination Vicinity Map X Pictures Landscaping Plan Petition (Official Street Map) X Site Plan Site Plan/Floor Plan Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report X Declarations Traffic Study Drainage Plan/Grading X Elevations SEPA Checklist V-03-87 Phil Korpi 10319 — 24,e St SW Edmonds, WA 98020 Request for variance — shed at 10319 — 2W St SW — Chapter 20.85 ECDC This request for a variance for the shed's setback from a designated steep slope critical area is based on the following criteria as outlined in section 20.15B.170: Section Al states: "Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, or the size or nature of the critical areas, the strict application of this title would deprive the subject property all reasonable use of the property." Section A2 states: "The granting of the variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the development proposal and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated, or contrary to the goals and purposes of this chapter." The shed satisfies these special circumstances outlined in section Al in that the proposed location is the most logical choice on the entire lot, in that it is situated on a level section close to the rear of the house that has existed for the 18 year lifetime of the initial development of the property, and requires no grading at all to accommodate the shed. The critical area is entirely unaffected by the placement of the shed, and rainwater runoff from the shed can be tied into existing rainwater runoff lines from the existing house on the property. Further, the granting of the variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the development proposal as outlined in section A2 - the proposed location is the most reasonable location on the existing lot, as it is the most hidden from the neighbors' view, has the least impact on the lot, and is the closest location to the existing house's most private patio area. V-03-8i, • I] city of edmonds land use application ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HOME OCCUPATION FORMAL SUBDIVISION SHORT SUBDIVISION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT STREET VACATION FILE # V ZONE K - 2 DATEO RF.C'I) BY FEE O RECEIPT # _22� HEARING DATE 0 REZONE 1f 0 SHORELINE PERMIT INVARIANCE / REASONABLE USE FaCCEPTION 0 OTHER• �—^" G1� I—� 1 G cvreGtS Ow 0 STAFF 0 PB 0 ADB 0 CC � DNS -Iv�wh -7��22°k REG7E1� t o JUN 17 2003 PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 10 31 q -ZLP L `S L V PERMIT COUNTER PROJECT NAME (IF AppuCABLE) Ash r PROPERTY OWNER f 1 (L KO K IP t PHONE # U 3-Y2 - 5-Z I LA ADDRESS r 3 / 9 - ?-f L J vA 5? S t.✓ 111, 4 eNys Ulk 1:-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # TAX ACCOUNT # SEC ,� iWAM= RNG. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE SAA-Y9 APPLICANT Psi L %<D/Q P� PHONE # 7.e ADDRESS O r r%/ � � k?02 0 $-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # ------------- CONTACT PERSON/AGENT R D �� PHONE # 29 '".S2— ADDRESS I D 3 / 9 ?�F�F s'` S �'�%, �/�^qS� f<.✓� 9�a20 _ E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # �— The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any d all g� application reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action Or infraction based in whole or gam. including inaccurate or incomplete information fimushed by the applicant, his/her/its agents or P false, misleading, g employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the stab of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspec ' and posting attendant to this application. Q^ SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE This application fora was revised on 1/27/00. To verify whether it is still current, call (425) 771-0220. L UBRAMPLANNINGWmw & Hm"ts\Public Hw"tsUAnd Use Applicatlon.doc / nl4 O7