110 MAIN ST (2)=,1
Serving Brier, Edmonds, and
Mountlake Terrace
www.FireDistrictl.org
LOCATION: 110 Main Street Bldg 98020
BUSINESS NAME: 110 Main St Bldg
MAILING
ADDRESS: ' 110 Main Street, Bldg, Edmonds, WA 98020
BUSINESS OWNER: Greiner, Kirk
i
EMERGENCY-1: Starllte Inv. LLC
KEY ACCESS-2:
EMAIL: ��- . (i re l MA/ &*AIC A • C awl
C
PERSON CONTACTED:
NAME OF INSPECTOR: , t " k -er A) M (- LaLr y, 1yt
FIRE SYSTEMS: FA 4/15 FE 2/13
D.gtP I q.t Rpr% irpH*q/7_411%gi 3/15r
12425 Meridian Ave S
Everett, WA 98208
Phone (425) 551-1200
Fax (425) 551-1272
PHONE:
HOME PHONE:
2.0\1
HOME PHONE: "425-74.34W
HOME PHONE:
i
FIRE PREVENTION
INSPECTION REPORT
EDMONDS
❑ BRIER
❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
❑ UNINCORPORATED
FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT
Annual 17-D
SCHEDULED DATE DUE Nov 2015
/
UFIR ► 509 202
CURRENT
CITY YES NO
BUSINESS
LICENSE �r
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
/2 /ty-'Z'o0�
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS
1_ �wn�.--
Liq �'1. �kZ� _oui-.
_ _
$ .
jJ
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
6.:
7
7
I AGREE TO.CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
I/�Y�IG
2nd RE -INSPECTION
EXTENSION
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
VIOLATIONS
DATE DUE:
DATEDUE: — mm�M�
GRANTEDTO:
DATE DUE-
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
— W
PERSON
CONTACTED:
1
INSPECTOR: C • S/11
----.-.
INSPECTOR:
,,,.-•„„_.___,_. ,,,,__
INSPECTOR:
2
2 /`�
DATE: •-�/`" 0��
DATE:
_
DATE: �.
.3�.__..__...,...„
VIOLATIONS
VIOLATIONS:., _
PRE -CITATION
CITATION ISSUED
1 _ 5 µ
1 5
LETTER SENT
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
5
3
RETURN RECEIPT
e
7
3
7
RECEIVED
DISPOSITION:
4
8
4
8
DATE:
7
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO�
8
SOUND ECURITYN&
FIRE ALARM INSPECTION FORM I :F-WER,rx L1 Of R1Aa
❑ 131�1SE ❑ EVF.RErr 0 IK1lt'1'LAND ;;k?ATTLE ❑ TACUMA
.MAY YRIflll' 1744 r 22216\1.1:1--1.A Iralair aim K1\-IICa?l.\I li f\'UNUr. 14Ox NYrl/Yl.\rr. Nl'4^1i178Iar "110RIMARk'"KIA, I O'F_Sr
RI11�1,II1 x1b1
KV11a I-: 1'r. R'A-j l
(3alIr3A,4v.7 PI/ar[.A117,UR91217 RISI,I.II\'1'Ii,YAVIW7 1M-rJY.IY',\xxxal
(1N)1M„W\a �VII:L•1 Y22 (�t11Ml.x9all r2111W r.411
Today's Date:4 — - Inspected Date: �' Due Date:
Annually 93 puarterty ❑ Monthly ❑ Aocount NumberbL) _ System Location
CONFIDENCE TEST � REPAIRS ❑ Certification RED (� YELLOW ❑ WHITE
Given:
Occupant Information Responsible Person
Building Nam: Name:
e
- ��iJ��oI1
Address: 1 /� I>k AN, I,, S Address:
(CIA44
It-A& �Q Phone:
Email:
Inspector[Tes_tor Information
Monitoring Information
Central Station Monitoring? Yes No ❑
Name:�� raj
Phone Number: y�S,
Monitoring Required? Yes No ❑
Monitoring Company: aY
Phone:
System Make' System Mod
CERTIFICATION TYPE
CERTIFICATION
NationaVNICET:
State: �t�
Local:
-eel.
/�hl �j� 1�� F S�a
Other:
DeftcienciesfViolations
& Corrections
Deficiency/Violation
Corrections Correction Date Corrected By
1
i Y
Notes
This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report
.and is consistent with state and local fire code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the
building owner/manager for corrective,. action.
/�
Tester Signature:��� i�t 4 Phone Number yf S Qs-736-1
/ [
Building Representative Signature: Garr
Refer to the local and state standards for a complete description of the inspection, testing, and maintenance requirements. The
inspection results provided in this report are based only on the system's current ability to operate and shall not be construed
as an evaluation of the system's performance capabilities to adequately protect the property, Information in this report may or
and should not be considered all inclusive. It is solely the property owner's
may not include possible performance concems
responsibility to determine if a separate investigation should be done to ensure the system will perform as designed and that the
property is adequately protected. 11 is also the property owner's responsibility to maintain the system, property and any possible
environmental conditions that may affect the system's operability and performance.
Fire Alarm Inspection Form, page
Alarm System Functionality
Yes
1 Trouble signal with AC power off?
2. System operates properly on battery backup?
Yes
No O
3. Battery voltage (no toad) p27-.� _ volts
4. Battery voltage (full load) volts (signals operating)
S. Charge circuit voltage �7 volts
6. System operates properly on standby power?
Yes fd'
No 0
7. All signals operate on AC power? /
Yes
No O
8. Number of initiating circuits /rp
9. Number of signal circuits
10. Does alarm system meet audibility standards as accepted?
Yes 113"
No O
11. All circults checked for electrical supervision?
Yes X11r,
No O
12. All auxiliary equipment operates (Elevators, fans, dampers)?
N/A Mr
Yes O
No O
13. Ventilation controls operate?
N/A W
Yes 0
No O
14. Key to panel available?
15. Materials and equipment needed to restore pull stations are available at the
N/A 0
N/A 0
Yes i'
Yes (
No 0
No O
main panel, e.g. glass rods, and plates; keys and allen wrenches, etc?
O
16. Operating instructions at panel?
Yes {g
No
17. Trouble indicators function properly?
Yes �'
No O
18. Remote Annunciator Panels function properly?
N/A O
Yes (ram
11i'
No O
No O
19. Elevator Call Down functions properly?
N/A O
Yes
Yes
No O
20. Test record posted at panel?
21. General alarm automatic time delay _D (minutes)
N/A 0
22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company?
N/A O
Yes Tr
No O
23. Other Devices (Specify)
Yes O
No 3'
System Devices
Total Number or
unAs in Builoing
Total Number
unite Tested
Test Results dtceptabe
24. Bells, Horns, Chimes
NIA. O
Yes 0-
No ❑
25. Voice Speakers (Voice Clarity)
N/A C"
Yes O
No O i
26. Visual Alarm Devices
27. Smoke Detectors
T
N/A 13
N/A O
Yes 0
Yes
No O
No D l
28. Heat Detectors
z_
N/A 0
Yes
No O l
29. Duct Detectors
}
1
N/A 9'
Yes
No 0
30. Sprinkler Flow Switches
(
N/A 0"'
Yes O
No O
31. Sprinkler Supervisory Switches
S
N/A Iff"
Yes O /
No C3
32. Manual Pull Stations
_�
N/A (3
Yes %
No O
33. Annunciator(s)
-L
N/A 0
Yes ®'
No ❑
34. Beam Detectors
N/A Tr
Yes O
No O
35. Automatic Door Unlocks
(
N/A Or'
Yes 0
No C3
36. Automatic Door Release
_
I
N/A O
Yes ®'
No O
37. Fire Dampers
N/A 2"
Yes O
No O
Communication_ Equipment
38. Phone Sets ^
39. Phone lacks
Total Number of ands i
in BOding
Total Nuft*& Units
Tested
Test Results Acceptable
_
_�
N/A O Yes Oil"
N/A ❑ Yes ER
No 0
No O
40. Cali -In Signal
N/A GY
Yes ❑
No O
Stairway Door locks
Yes O
No 2"-
4 1. Number of stories?
N/A O
Yes O
No O
42. Do all locking devices release upon activation of the fire alarm system?
N/A LZY
Yes O
No O
43. Do all locking devices release upon power failure?
N/A OY
Yes O
No O
44. Does the door to roof unlock?
N/A ®'
Yes O
No O
45. Do doors unlock but not unlatch?
N/A O'
Yes O
No O
46, Is there an access key at the control panel for doors that fail to unlock?
NJA E
Yes O
No O
Fire Alarm Systems Page 2 of 2
..`�� FIRE PREVENTION
Servink Brier, Edmonds, and 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT
SNO140NICO. � FllspjL;j
Moi��itlake TerrWA 98208 ❑ EDMONDS
ace Everett, BRIER
"" ~" ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
ill T
Phone (425) 551-1200❑UNINCORPORATED
��N�r� www.FireDistrictl. org Fax (425) 551-1272
FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFT
LOCATION:. 110 Main Street Bldg 98020 Annual 17-A
11 Main l SCHEDULED
BUSINESS NAME. O a St Bldg Nov 2016
g PHONE: DATE DUE
U
MAILING UFIR k 509 202
ADDRESS:110 Main Street, Bldg, Edmonds, WA 98020
BUSINESS OWNER: Greiner, Kirk. HOME PHONE:
EMERGENCY-1:Starllte Inv. LLC HOME PHONE: 4257434600 CURRENT
KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO
EMAIL: BUSINESS ❑
LICENSE
PERSON CONTACTED: r / INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTORI
FIRE SYSTEMS: FA 4/16 VE 3/1
Date Last Serviced:
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS /iCOMMUNICATIONS
i
2'V 2
3
4
5
6
3
4
5
6
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
2nd RE -INSPECTION
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
EXTENSION VIOLATIONS
DATE DUE:
DATE DUE:
GRANTEDTO DATE DUE: CITED:
PERSON
PERSON
4i PERSON
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
12
INSPECTOR_
DATE:
DATE:
13
;DATE.
VIOLATIONS
'5
VIOLATIONS
_
CITATION ISSUED `
PRE -CITATION i 4
1 ..
1 - 5
LETTER SENT NUMBER' ... ._.. ,
- CODE € 5
2 6
2 '6
DATE' SECTION'
RETURN RECEIPT
e
3 7
3 7
RECEIVED
- DISPOSITION. '
4 8
4 8
DATE
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
g
SONrrROI®
VERIFIED ELECTRONIC SECURITY
SONITROL PAC IFIC
A Sound Security, Inc. Company
1.800.898.1899
2221 California Street
Everett, WA 98201
This is a Federal Building O
VJ
Seaftwfire Department
Confidence Test Report (use one form per Sys.)
206-386-1448 Confidence Testing Officer
206-615-1068 (fax)
206-233-7219 Red Tag Hotline
FIRF, ALARM Status Given
CONFIDENCE TEST I REACCEPTANCE TEST O I RED O YELLOW O 1 WHITE
Occupancy Address:
Responsible Person -d vv< ° ) ST
First & Last Name: I%, 140
Occupancy Name: SQ4S12t oR j4,,t A -
Phone Number:
Responsible Person Responsible Party
Address, City, State, Zip: E—Mail Address
Technician's Name (o�a s lit-- r SCP-
(Please Print legibly) SFD Certification No.
Date of Test:_ 4I,S Test Frequency: Quarterly D (NIYh-lae OnN)
Annual
System Make: G System Model: �a ci �
System Identification No. ;a t System Location: ' &Ce
SFD ID No.
(Call 386-1448 for this No.)
Central station monitoring? Yes No O Monitor', any
Monitoring Required? Yes No O Name S�Z,ovdtc-
DEFICIENCIES FOUND? Yes O No Ist items that were not corrected at the time of the confidence test. Use
the Deficiencies section or attach Itethized sheet
REPAIRS: All deficiencies have been corrected O
Corrected By: SFD Certification Number. SCP —
System Status changed to White (including the tag on the system) O
This certifies that this fire protection system has been properly inspected for functional operation in accordance with the curre
Seattle Fire Code (SFC), Administrative Rules, and NFPA Standards adopted by the SFC for this system: The discrepancies',
found are noted in the report and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action.
Signature of Technician 1 _ Phone # p'2U%40 " 2(C_
Name of Testing Company /
Building Representative (signature) G Date 4- IV,1.5
Print Name and Title -e t V-�j e'" Direct Phone # Y - / IV
Building Rep unavailable O Building Rep declined to sign report O 1
THIS REPORT WILL BE SENT TO THE SEATTLE FIRE DEPARTMENT BY THE TESTING AGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 9.02.09
ALL DEFICIENCIES RECORDED ON THIS REPORT SHALL BE CORRECTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE TEST DATE
Fire Alarm
9-2012 Ver.1.3
Page 1 of 4
This is a Federal Building 0
The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required
inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the 2009 Seattle Fire Code (SFC) Section 907, Sec.
510 and Appendix J; SFC Administrative Rules 9.02.09 and 9.04.07; and 2007 NFPA 72 for inspecting and testing
requirements.
PRE -TEST CHECK
Prior to starting work precautions were taken to prevent an alarm from going to
the fire de artment by making notification of the test to: check all that apply)
1. The building occupants N/A ❑ Yes No ❑
2. The onsite supervisory station N/A Yes ❑ ' No ❑
3. The Central Station Monitoring Service N/A ❑ Yes No ❑
GENERAL
4. The key to the panel is available at the FACP. N/A O YeM No ❑
S. The operating instructions are available at the FACP. YesLIG No ❑
6. Materials and equipment needed to restore pull stations are available at the
main panel, e.g. glass rods, and plates; keys and alien wrenches, etc N/A ❑ Yes, No ❑
ALARM PANEL
7. All signals on the FACP operate on AC power. Yes No O
8. All signals on the FACP operate on Battery power. Yes No ❑
9. All signals on the FACP operate on emergency generator/standby power N/A ❑ Yes No ❑
10. The trouble indicators function properly and a trouble signal comes on with AC Power off. Yes No O
INITIATING DEVICES AND ALARM APPLIANCES
11. All initiating and annunciating devices tested operate properly on AC power.
Yes No O
12. All initiating and annunciating devices tested operate properly on generator/standby power.
Yes No ❑
13. All initiating and annunclating devices tested operate properly on battery power.
Yes No O
14. The greater of 2 or 20% of the INITIATING DEVICES per circuit were tested in accordance
with 2007 NFPA 72 Chapter 10. (The sample of appliances is required to be recorded in
a log and the sample changed each year so that all appliances are tested every 5 years.)
15. The 2 200k
Ye9A No ❑
greater of or of the AUDIBLE ALARM APPLIANCES per circuit
N
were tested in accordance with 2007 NFPA 72 Chapter 10. (The sample —
YesO No ❑
of appliances is required to be recorded in a log and the sample changed
each year so that all appliances are tested every 5 years.)
16. The audible alarm appliances tested operate at the levels designed by the manufacturer.
Yes* No ❑
17. The audible appliances tested in residential units generate a minimum of
60dBA in the sleeping areas. N/q%*
18. The greater of 2 or 20% of the VISUAL ALARM APPLIANCES per circuit
Yes O No O
were tested in accordance with 2007 NFPA 72 Chapter 10 (The sample 3 {��s
of appliances is required to be recorded in a log and the sample changed
each year so that all appliances are tested every 5 years.)
19. The
Yes No O
visual alarm appliances tested operate as designed by the
manufacturer.
Yes') No ❑
BATTERIES
20. The batteries are rated for: hours Ldo minutes
21. Battery voltage (no load) 114--Z voks
22. Battery voltage (full load) 3 , i ?C�volts (signals operating)
23. Charge circuit voltage jn,,j.volts
Fire Alarm
9-2012 Ver.1.3 Page 2 of 4
v
u
This is a Federal Building O
INTERFACE DEVICES
The FACP received signals from the following Interface devices:
Tested by: Simulation C3 Operation�'j
24. Emergency Generator(s)
N/A 0
Yes ❑
No ❑
25. Flow Switch(es)
N/A $7
Yes O
No ❑
26. Supervisory Switch(es)
N/A 0
Yes ❑
No ❑
27. Range Hood Suppression System(s)
N/A
Yes ❑
No ❑
28. Spray Booth Suppression System(s)
N/A
Yes ❑
No ❑
29. Clean Agent System(s)
N/A ,0
Yes ❑
No ❑
30. Pre -action Systems(s)
N/A .0
Yes ❑
No ❑
31. Pull Stations
N/A ❑
Yes W
No ❑
OTHER E UIPMENT CONTROLLED BY FACP
The following Fire Safety Functions responded to signals from the FACP.
Tested by Simulation O Operation O
Note: This Section replaces the Sequence Test Form. The checks in this section are only required during one
of the quarterly tests. The
functions in this section require testing during the annual confidence test for all other buildings.
32. Fan controls
N/A ❑
Yes,2
No ❑
33. Smoke Dampers
N/A A
Yes ❑
No O
34. Elevator Recall system
N/A ❑
Yesp
No ❑
35. Elevator Shunt Switch(es)
N/A ❑
Yeso
No ❑
36. Door holder releases
N/A ❑
Yeso
No ❑
37. Door Lock devices
N/A W
Yes ❑
No O
38. Fire Pump(s)
N/A J*
Yes ❑
No ❑
39. General alarm automatic time delay (minutes)
N/A M
Yes ❑
No ❑
40. Remote Annunciator Panels
N/A ❑
YesJW
No ❑
COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
Test Results Acceptable
41. All phone sets function properly.
N/A
Yes ❑
No O
42. All phone jacks function properly.
N/A
Yes ❑
No O
43. All phone indicating devices at the FACP work properly
N/A
Yes ❑
No ❑
44. The public address equipment at the FACP works properly.
N/A
Yes ❑
No ❑
45. The in building Emergency Radio Communication Systems function
throughout the building in accordance with 2009 SFC Sec. 510 and
N/A
Yes ❑
No ❑
Appendix 3. Annual Test O 5-Year Test O
ALARM PANEL MONITORING
46. A signal was received at the Central Station monitoring company. N/A ❑ Yes, No ❑
FINAL CHECKS
47. The Fire Alarm was removed from test mode and/or other precautionary
measures were removed to restore the fire alarm system to normal
operation (includes removal of protective coverings). Yes No ❑
48. The test record was posted at panel. Yes No O
49. A copy of the confidence test report was given to the owner and a current status tag was
posted on the Alarm Panel. Yes No ❑
50. The confidence test report was sent to the fire marshal's office. Yes ❑ No ❑
v
Fire Alarm
9-2012 Ver.1.3 Page 3 of 4
This is a Federal Building D
Deficiencies
Resolved D
Location:
Deficiency:
Recommended Resolution:
SFC and/or 2007 NFPA 72 reference:
Resolved O
Location:
Deficiency:
Recommended Resolution:
SFC and/or 2007 NFPA 72 refers e:
Resolved O
Location:
Deficiency;
Recomm ded Resolution:
SFC nd/or 2007 NFPA 72 reference:
-------------
Fire Alarm
9-2012 Ver.1.3 Page 4 of 4
SNOHOMISH CO.
FIRE
'MST]
Serving Brief, Edmonds, and
Mountlake Terrace
www.FireDistrictl.org
12425 Meridian Ave S
Everett, WA 98208
Phone (425) 551-1200
Fax (425) 551-1272
FIRE PREVENTION
INSPECTION REPORT
KI EDMONDS
❑ BRIER
❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
❑ UNINCORPORATED
FREQUENCY
STATION &SHIFT
LOCATION:
i (C ir7j11 Street Bldg fl$A2D
AtitltJal
17-B
BUSINESS NAME:
11U Main SL Bldg:
PHONE
SCHEDULED
DATEDUE ►Nav2f1 3
yy
1, MAILING
UFIR 609
ADDRESS:
110 Main Slrcc4 Bldg, Edrrm3n&-, VVA 03020
�i BUSINESS OWNER:
I�
HOME PHONE:
EMERGENCY-1:
Stirlitc Inv. I I C,
HOME PHONE:
4:)57434WO
CURRENT
KEY ACCESS 2:
HOME PHONE:
�--
CITY YES
NO
EMAIL:
•
BUSINESS
❑
LICENSE
PERSON CONTACTED: NQ
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
NAME OF INSPECTOR:i5q, I.R
FIRE SYSTEMS;
FA t FE
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS COMMUNICATIONS
1 .�•. 1
7 1
1
2 �e
t_ �c .� 1 - i
ra,
2
3
/
3
_
4
4
5 IM ]�
VVV
V
5
VI' ,
' \ ID 6) )-u
J
6
6
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
2nd RE -INSPECTION
EXTENSION
FINAL RE -INSPECTION
VIOLATIONS
DATE DUE:
DATE DUE:
GRANTEDTO:
DATE DUE:
CITED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON
CONTACTED:
PERSON-.
CONTACTED:
1
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
VIOLATIONS
PRE -CITATION
CITATION ISSUED
4
1 S
1 S
LETTER SENT
NUMBER:
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
5
3
7
3
!
7
RETURN RECEIPT
RECEIVED
5
•
DISPOSITION:
7
4
8
4
8
DATE:
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
8
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
SNOHOMISH CO. Serving Brier, Edmonds
AFIRE; Mountlake Terrace,and
the Town of Woodway
ISTR A Tw.wwFireDistrictl. org
D4,
p LOCATION: % 6 M1/ 117A/
BUSINESS NAME:' l , t�� 6 A.J:N
MAILING
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS OWNER:
EMERGENCY-1.: (/lp
KEY ACCESS-2: !�
PERSON CONTACTED: /4*—f (L-K f Q R. �/1 A/
NAME OF INSPECTOR:
12425 Meridian Ave S'_
Everett, WA 98208
Phone (425) 551-1200
Pax (425) 551-1272
F FIRE PREVENTION
INSPECTION REPORT
❑ EDMONDS
❑ BRIER
❑ WOODWAY
❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
❑ UNINCORPORATED
FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFT
PHONE: SCHEDULED
DATE DUE /
UFIR /
HOME PHONE:
HOME PHONE.��
HOME PHONE:
CURRENT A.4s No
CITY
BUSINESS
LICENSE
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS
2
2
y,:
e
3
3
[�-- � �
/� 'r
,r1
6 5
/ / �y�-�
Z h17 Af6,
4
17 t
6%
U
4
5
5
(
jC
6
-
.---- ;
t
6
ulT ,tj
7
r
7
1 AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVq VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X`.
1st RE -INSPECTION
2nd RE -INSPECTION
g' EXTENSION
FINAL RE-INSPFCTION
VIOLATIONS
DATE DUE,
DATE_DUE,
GRANTED T
DATEDUE. /�"
CITED:
PERSON
PERSON
PERSON
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
J'
�
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
-
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
VIOLATIONS
..
PRE -CITATION
CITATION ISSUED
'
5
LETTER SENT.
NUMBER:
4
2
6
2
6
DATE:
CODE
SECTION:
5
'
RETURN RECEIPT
3
7
3
7
RECEIVED
5
i
DISPOSITION:
4
8
4
8
DATE:
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
8
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY 1
FIRE PREVENTION
Serving Brier; Edmonds
1242S Ml i-idian Ave S
INSPECTION REPORT
SNOHOMISH CO.
Mountlake Terrace,and
�I��
a
Everett, ''WA 98208
❑ EDMONDS
❑BRIER
_
`
DISTR y T the Town of Woodway
www.FireDistrictl.org
Phone (425) 551-1200
Fax (425) 551-1272
❑ MOAY
❑ OUNTUNTLAKE TERRACE
❑ UNINCORPORATED
FREQUENCY
STATION & SHIFT
LOCATION: 110 Maid Street
365
17 D
I
BUSINESS NAME: 110 Mein St Bldg
PHONE:
SCHEDULED
DATE DUE ► 11101/11
MAILING 3909 134th St SW
UFIR / 509 1'202
ADDRESS: Lynnwood
93037
BUSINESS OWNER: Stariite Inv. LLD
HOME PHONE: 4257434600
ACTIVE
EMERGENCY-1: Hardy, Doti
HOME PHONE: 4257434600
CURRENT
� KEY ACCESS-2:
; HOME PHONE:
CITY YES NO
BUSINESS
LICENSE
PERSON CONTACTED: Vvi 51��
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE
/
NAME OF INSPECTOR: dQ IA'� b !
l 2 (� l
f FIRE Fro 4/10 FD LkBx
FE
SYSTEMS: r
ANNUAL
HAZARDS FOUND AND 6(-1CATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS
1
r
FED(
2
2
3 � � '7—t
3
4
4
X-
5
5
6
6
7
7
I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X
1st RE -INSPECTION
2nd RE -INSPECTION
FINAL RE
55>
EXTENSION
-INSPECTION
VIOLATIONS
,?l.;t
DATE DUE:
DATE DUE:
GRANTED TO:
DATE DUE:
CITED:
PERSON
PERSON
PERSON
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
CONTACTED:
1
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
INSPECTOR:
2
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
3
VIOLATIONS
VIOLATIONS
PRE -CITATION
CITATION ISSUED
1 5
1 5
LETTER SENT
NUMBER:
4
CODE
5
2
6
2
6
DATE:
SECTION:
RETURN RECEIPT
3
7
3
7
RECEIVED
5
DISPOSITION:
7
4
8
4
6
DATE:
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO
g
FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY
M: - 3 =I 1I Z1)•f'"�1)I�IZii ' u s•') �%� ma . 4.119 >I 4M 1�' 1-I � .�
From:MOUNTAIN ALARM
2534734552
05/05/2010 15:51 #278 P.002/002
Tillft
BURGLAR AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
SINCE 1952
P.O. Box 9006 Tacoma, WA 98490
Phone: (253) 473-3812 • 1-800-473-7233 • Fax: (253) 473-4552
Maintenance
Confidence Testing
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
TEST REPORT
AD P I
C Gi l.
it N
.30
z U Z
NA E OF FACI ITY
pH
r
7
L—
OCCUPIED AS
INS TED
TYPE
❑
CO PANY PERF RMIN S
OFTL::ST: MONTHLY
SEMIANNUAL
ANNUAL QUARTER
ACCEPT
BATTERY VOLTA �j
vOI.TAGF: BATTERYOLTS CHARGE CIRCUIT VOLTS TINDER FULL LOAD J VOLTS
ITEM
YES
NO
N/A
ITEM
YES
NO
N/A
ITEM
YES
NO
N/A
TROUBLE SIGNAL
01
CIRCUITS CHECKED FOR
GEWL ALARM AUTOMATIC
AC POWER OFF
ELECTRICAL SUPERVISION
TIME DELAY: MIN.
SYSTEM OPERATES ON
CONTROL PANEL CHECKED PER
SYSTEM WIRING CONFORMS
STANDBY POWER
NFPA & MFGS INST.
TO NEC STANDARDS
SIGNALS OPERATE ON
AUXILIARY EQUI..OPERATES
KEY TO PANEL
AC POWER
(ELEVATORS, FANS, DAMPERS)
AVAILABLE
SIGNALS OPERATE
CENTRAL STATION OR
OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS
ON STANDBY POWER
REMOTE CONNECTION
AT PANEL
PANE
ODEL: NO, INIAT. NO SIGNAL
MFG. )
7-0 ZONES ZONES
NO. OF UNITS
SATISFACTORY
140. OF UNITS
SATISFACTORY
TYPE OF EQUIPM
TYPE OF EQUIPMENT
IN BLDG TESTED
YES
NO N/A
IN BLDG.
TESTED
YES I
NO
N/A
BELLS, HORNS, CHIMES,
('/
(��
DUCT DETECTORS
VOICE ALARM. SPEAKERS
b
jf
VISUAL ALARM DEVICES
SPECIAL EXTINGUISHING
SYSTEMS
TROUBLE INDICATORS
7—
ANNUNCIATORS
1
HEAT DETECTORS
yl
v
/
ELEVATOR RECALL
WATER FLOW SWITCHES
PHONF. JACKS
AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER
ARE & SMOKE DAMPERS
SUPERVISORY SWITCHES
SMOKE DETECTORS
DOOR RELEASE (DEVICE
CONTROLLED)
MANUAL PULL STATIONS
AUTO DOOR UNLOCKS
(FAILSAFE)
GENERATOR STARTSL"000UTO
DOOR RELEASE
(FAIL SAFE)
VENTILATION CONTROLS
OTHER
OPERATE
NO. OF SMOKE- DETECTOR CALIBRATION CHECKS PERFORMED
LOOP RESISTANCE PER ZONE WITH SHORT
YES
NO
AT LAST DEVICE TAKEN
NO. OF SMOKE DETECTORS CLEANED
IF QUARTERLY
ZONES OR FLOORS TESTED
PROBLEMS FOUND/CORRECTIONS MADE:
DATE
CORRECTED BY:
CORRECTED:
lLelM AGE- T. .---
NSE NO.
PHONE:
0 — — 2 33
urc)
bl4h 4
OWNER OR FACILITY
ATE
REPRESENTATIVE: (Signature)T
d
rr
ROUTING: WHITE —Fire Prev.. YELLOW --Fire Alarm Co.: PINK --Owner
From:MOUNTAIN ALARM 2534734552 05/05/2010 15:51 #278 P.001/002
TRItt
gp}--
Mountain Alarm * P.O. Box 9006 Tacoma, WA. 98490 * Tel. 253.473,3812 * Toll Free. 800.473.7233 * Fax. 253.473,4552
05/05/10
To: Edmonds Fire Department
Fire Marshall Office
(425) 775-7721
Re: Annual Fire Alarm Inspection Report for Review
Pages: 2
Note:
The accompanying annual test reports are for fire systems we
show that are within your jurisdiction. If any of these are not
within your jurisdiction, the wrong report form was used, or
any other problems are found, please notify me.
Thank you,
Leah Hampton
Test & Inspect Division
Tel. (253) 473-3812
P.O. Box 9006 • Tacoma, Washington 98409
Office: (253) 473-3812 • (800) 473-7233 • Fax (253) 473-4552
MEMORANDUM
DATE L-/11�;,6
REPORTED BY �'� OF
SUBJECT
ADDRESS: //0_ S-7
CONCERNS/
HAZARDS: AeX r T— P�s�
FOLLOW-UP:
SIGNED
k zG710-V
SIGNED
City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention
iTT,
J
Date:.
To:
From:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
July 21, 1996
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
John Westfall, Fire Inspector
Fire Alarm System Check #96-155: LCM Bldg 110 Main Street
The Fire Department has the following comments upon attached ICBO FIRE ALARM
NOTES:
1. Final acceptance test on all functions of system in presence of Fire
Marshal or representative.
2. Concur.
3. Location of FACP, annunciation panel and Fire Department lockbox
approved as drawn. Coordinate with Fire Department for "Lockbox
Authorization Letter" and instructions to obtain lockbox.
4. Concur.
5. Concur.
6. Concur.
7. Concur.
Fire Department has the following additional comments for plans:
8. Coordinate with Fire Marshal or representative regarding final placement
of outside fire alarm bell.
9. Carbon monoxide detection device in garage area shall not be inter-.
connected to fire alarm common wiring, nor provide annunciation by
means of building fire alarm system.
10. Security devices may use common wiring with fire alarm system, not to
interfere with supervision of the fire system, nor prevent fire alarm or
supervisory signal transmissions.
cc: Fire Marshal Gary McComas
Plans Review Technician Ann Bullis
City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention
r
1
FIRE ALARM NOTES
1. Upon completion of the installation, the installer shall prove to the satisfaction of the fire
chief that all functions of the added system works as designed.
2. The permittee shall provide the fire chief with written certification that the system was
installed in conformance with the approved phm and specification at the conclusion of the job.
3. The location of locked FACP, remote annunciator panels and their access keys shall be
approved by the fire chief prior to permit issuance.
4. The written operating instructions. for all panels and annunciators shall be stored at the
location of these units.
5. A yearly alarm maintenance and test program done by third party testing companies shall
o be set up bw the owner who shall provide it to the fire. chief at the final inspection.
6. F-type through penetration fire stop material shall be provided around wall or membrane
penetrations and/or floor and ceiling penetrations. T-type of fire stop material shall be provided
for pipes and conduits larger than 4" nominal diameter at penetration of floor membranes, . above
corridor ceilings not required to be part of its assembly, and where they penetrate below any
ceiling adjacent to wall requiring protected openings.
7. Manual fire alarm panels shall be installed no more than 54" above the finish floor surface.
�.
^ �
�}
� -- --- ��f - --'--'-----�--- --- �----------
|
�
-� JE-__AAAAIIJ
�
.
'
|
- ' -1 '� - - - - ---'� -�- -
TEL-
- - - - - -
- ----- - -- -------- - -
Ll
�
- --- ---T -------'----- '---------------------------------------------
--'----- '
-- -- -'--'�Y�('--°°~^~~''�'~---'-----'--'---------------'-------'-----------
-------- - '-
~7 �
�|
- ---�-�----^f-------�---------'-�-------'------------------------�----------------- -----'-'
i
INITIATING DEVICES
CO -DCGT&,e_
72-85
5-4.4.2.3• In applications where the fire to be detected
could occur in an area not on the optical axis of the detector,
the distance shall be reduced or detectors added to compen-
sate for the angular displacement of the fire in accordance
with the manufacturer's documented instructions.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.2.3 modified]
54.4.2.4• In applications in which the fire to be detected
is of a fuel different than the test fuel used in the process
of listing or approval, the distance between the detector
and the fire shall be adjusted consistent with the fuel spec-
ificity of the detector as established by the manufacturer...
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.2.4]
5-4.4.2.5 Since flame detectors are essentially line of sight
devices, special care shall be taken to ensure that their abil-
ity to respond to the required area of fire in the zone that
is to be protected will not be compromised by the presence
of intervening structural members or other opaque objects
or materials.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.2.5 and 5-5.1]
5-4.4.2.6s Provisions shall be made to sustain detector
window clarity in applications where airborne particulates
and aerosols coat the detector window between mainte-
nance intervals and affect sensitivity.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.2.6 modified]
5-4.5 Spacing Considerations for Spark/Ember Detectors.
[From NFPA 72E - 1996, 5-4.3]
54.5.1• The location and spacing of detectors shall be the
result of an engineering evaluation, taking into consideration:
(a) The size of the spark or ember that is to be detected
(b) The fuel involved
(c) The sensitivity of the detector
(d) The field of view of the detector
(e) The distance between the fire andthe detector
(f) The radiant energy absorption of the atmosphere
(g) The presence of extraneous sources of radiant emissions
(h) The purpose of the detection systems
(i) The response time required.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.3.1 modified]
54.5.2• The system design shall specify the`size of the
spark or ember of given fuel that the detection system is to
detect.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.3.2 modified]
5-4.5.3 Spark detectors shall be positioned so that all
points within the cross section of the conveyance duct, con-
veyor, or chute. where the detectors are located are within
the field of view of at least one detector as defined in
5-4.2.1.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.3.31
5-4.5.4 The location and spacing of the detectors shall be
adjusted using the inverse square law, modified for the
atmospheric absorption and the absorption of nonburning
fuel, suspended in the air in accordance with the manufac-
turer's documented instructions. (See A-5-4.4.1.1.)
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.3.4 modified]
5-4.5.5• In applications where the sparks to be detected
could occur in an area not on the optical axis of the detector,
the distance shall be reduced or detectors added to compen-
sate for the angular displacement of the fire in accordance
with the manufacturer's documented instructions.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.3.5 modified]
5-4.5.60 Provisions shall. be made to sustain the detector
window clarity in applications where airborne particulates
and aerosols coat the detector window and affect sensitivity.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-4.3.6 modified]
5-4.6 Other Considerations.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-6]
5-4.6.1 Radiant energy -sensing detectors shall be pro-
tected either by way of design or installation to ensure that
optical performance is not compromised.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-6.2 modified]
54.6.2 Where necessary, radiant energy -sensing detec-
tors shall be shielded or otherwise arranged to prevent
action from unwanted radiant energy.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-6.3]
5-4.6.3 Where used in outdoor applications, radiant
energy -sensing detectors shall be shielded or otherwise
arranged in a fashion to prevent diminishing sensitivity by
rain, snow, etc., and yet allow a clear field of vision of the
hazard area.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 5-6.4 modified]
5.5 Gas -Sensing Fire Detectors.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, Chap. 6]
5-5.1• The purpose of Section 5-5 is to provide informa-
tion to assist in application and installation of fire detectors
that sense gases produced by burning substances. These
detectors are hereafter referred to as fire -gas detectors.
This section covers general area application of fire -gas
detectors in ordinary indoor locations.
[New paragraph]
5-5.2 Fire -gas detectors shall be installed in all areas
where required: either by the appropriate NFPA standard
or by the authority having jurisdiction.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 6-1.1.31
5-5.3 Fire -gas detectors shall respond to one or more of
the gases produced by a fire. Gases are molecules without
cohesion that are produced by a burning substance and are
subject to oxidation or reduction.
[From NFPA 72E - 1990, 6-1.1.41
5-5.4 Although some fire -gas detectors are capable of
detecting' combustible gases or..vapor`s priof to�ignhion,
such applications are not within the scope Hof this code.
1993 Edition
' FOREWORD/1'HE PROBLEM 328-5
NFPA 328
Recommended Practice for the Control of
Flammable and Combustible Liquids and
Gases in Manholes, Sewers, and Similar
Underground Structures
1992 Edition
NOTICE: Information on referenced publications can be
found in Chapter 4.
Foreword
Manholes, sewers, and similar underground _ conduits
have long been recognized as constituting areas where fire
and explosion hazards of some severity might exist. The
probability of an explosion within an underground space
depends on two factors: (1) that the atmosphere contains
a mixture.of flammable vapor and air .within the flamma-
ble range, and (2) that there be a coincident source of igni-
tion. The severity of an individual explosion and its conse-
quences depends on various factors. The possibility that
anyone explosion might result in a major catastrophe is
always present. .
This publication is limited to the control of hazards pre-
sented by flammable and combustible liquids and gases
found in' manholes, sewers; vaults, and similar under-
ground structures. The underground structures include:
sanitary sewers, storm drains; water lines, fuel gas distribu-
tion systems, electric light and power conduits, telephone
and telegraph communication lines, street -lighting con-
duits, police and fire signal systems, traffic signal lines,
refrigeration service lines, steam lines, and petroleum
pipelines.
The term'.underground structures" is,not ,intended to
include subways, tunnels, ,And -the `substructural areas -'of
buildi`ngs_su"ch as underground garages.
The purpose of this publication is to give to enforcement
officials, fire authorities, contractors, and owners of under-
ground structures guidance on problems involving flammable
and combustible liquids and gases that might be found in
underground structures.
Chapter 1 The Problem
1-1 General. With increasing congestion and for aes-
thetic considerations, the trend in civic planning is toward
the installation of all types of utility services beneath the
street surface. This results in a continuous program of
excavation and construction, with frequent damage to
existing structures.
1-2 Sources.of Ignition.
1-2.1 . The possibility of ignition of flammable gases or
vapors that might collect in underground areas is limited
by certain fundamental conditions. The vapor must be
mixed with sufficient air to make a flammable mixture or
it must be escaping into air at a point where a flammable
mixture can be created. Heat of sufficient intensity to ignite
the particular air -vapor mixture involved must be present
at the place where a flammable mixture exists. Such heat
[night be caused by an open flame, an electric arc or spark,
an incandescent heated particle, or a hot surface.
1-2.2 The flammable limits of the gases and vapors that
have been found in underground structures are listed in
Appendix A. Flammable mixtures are formed when the
concentration of these gases in air is between the minimum
and maximum shown.
1-2.3 Any open flame is a potential source of ignition.
These can be encountered in everyday work operations.
Little control can be exerted over the casual sources of
ignition when flammable vapors are escaping from or into
underground structures. Such casual sources of ignition
include burners and warning lanterns used by street sur-
face maintenance crews, automotive and other internal
combustion engines, tar pots, and pedestrian smokers.
1-2.4 The heat of an electric arc occurring in electric
underground structures can cause the distillation of insu-
lating material, thus producing flammable gases that in
turn can be ignited by the arc itself when the proper air -
gas ratio is reached. This usually will occur when the arc
reaches a manhole or vault after having started in a duct.
Other gases or flammable vapors, if present, can also be
ignited by such an arc.
1-2.5 Static electricity. can be a source of ignition and its
accumulation is generally greatest in an atmosphere. of low
humidity. The hazard appears when static accumulates to the
extent where a spark discharge occurs. Static electricity can
be generated when a liquid under pressure escapes from it
pipe at high velocity. Particles of dust, scale, or rust, or liquid
droplets, inside the pipe can become heavily charged with
static when blown out by gas or vapor and, if they impinge on
an electrically isolated body, the body will accumulate the
charge and a spark discharge can occur.
1-3 Sources of Flammable and Combustible Liquids and
Gases.
1-3.1 The condition created by the existence of gases and
vapors in underground structures can be grouped into two
classes: (1) flammable and (2) injurious to life. The latter
condition results from the toxic or suffocating properties of
the gases or vapors. Some ,of these liquids and gases fall
into both classes. While this publication deals primarily
with the flammable limits associated with liquids and gases,
some of which are listed in Appendix A, additional ,precau-
tions may be required to protect against health hazards. An
example is hydrogen sulfide; its dangerous breathing con-
centration is only a small fraction of the lower flammable
limit (LFL).
1-3.2 Natural Gas. Natural gas is gas originating from
naturally occurring gas- or oil-bearing strata. In oil- and
natural gas_producing areas, cracks and faults in the
underlying strata or abandoned wells may permit gas to
permeate the soil and enter underground conduits and
vaults. Within the boundaries of some cities, there are
actively producing oil and gas fields 'and many of these
underlie developed areas, residential and industrial, where
underground structures are now installed.
1992 Edition
• PROTECTIVE PRAcricEs ' 328-7
due to the soil's acid or alkali content, organic matter, vari-
ations of water or oxygen content, soil type, or the pres-
ence of certain bacteria in the soil. Corrosion can also occur
as a result of chemical reaction between the pipe and sur-
rounding soil. Corrosion of this type can be controlled with
cathodic protection.
1-4.2 Stray Currents. - Another cause of corrosion in
underground lines is stray electric currents originating
from such sources as direct -current electric railways and
trolley lines using rails to carry return currents; industrial
plant direct -current machinery using the ground as a
return conductor; stray currents from cross -connections
with other structures carrying current; and leakage from
foreign system cathodic protection rectifiers. These cur-
rents might not be destructive where they enter the piping
system, but drainage of these stray currents to ground can
cause corrosion at these points of discharge.
14.3 Structural Failures. The allocation of insufficient
space for the installation of underground structures can, in
some situations, result in the encasement of gas and flam-
mable and combustible liquid pipes in the walls of ducts
and subsequently constructed masonry vaults. Such pipes
from vaults might be fractured under certain conditions.
Flood washouts, earthquakes, and landslides can cause the
dislocation and movement of ground and are often respon-
sible for pipe fractures. Rupture of water mains due to cor-
rosion, electrolysis, or structural failure can, in turn, cause
washout of soil that supports gas and flammable liquid
pipes. Lacking support, these pipes can fracture.
1-4.4. Excavating. Contractors doing excavation work
often encounter gas mains and flammable and combustible
liquid pipes. Even though aware of their presence, workers
might unintentionally damage a pipe, resulting either immedi-
ately or ultimately in a leak. Damage such as this is not always
reported and often inadequate repairs are attempted by the
party responsible for the physical damage.
1-4.5 Fire Damage. Fires in underground structures can
result in spalling of concrete, destruction of protective lin-
ings, and deterioration of other interior surfaces. Such
damage, if extensive, can weaken the structure.
1-5 Unsafe Practices.
1-5.1 Before washing spilled petroleum products from
street surfaces into drains or sewers (a potentially danger-
ous action and often an unlawful practice), other disposal
means, such as soaking up the substance with sand, rags,
or mops,.should be considered. If, in an emergency, no
alternative is available, disposal into a drain or sewer
should be done only on the decision of a qualified person,
after appropriate public authorities have been notified.
1-5.2 Disastrous consequences can result from the
thoughtless or deliberate dumping into drains of waste
products that .are either flammable or that, by. reaction
with organic matter in. sewers" can produce a flammable
mixture. Though the .presence of a flammable material
might be detected, its source can be difficult to determine.
Chapter 2 Protective Practices
2-1 The adoption of protective measures that will detect
the presence of flammable materials in manholes and
vaults and provide the means to prevent the accumulations
of gas or vapor within the explosive range should reduce
the incidence of explosions in underground structures.
Such a defensive procedure is necessary, because of the dif-
ficulty of eliminating the flammable material at its source.
2-2 Numerous sources of ignition can be found in under-
ground structures. The operators of underground struc-
tures can materially reduce the number of ignitions by
eliminating the use of flames in suspected areas. Experi-
ence has shown, though, that fire and explosion incidence
can best be reduced by the elimination of flammable
vapors from the atmosphere of the underground struc-
ture. It is all but impossible to remove all ignition sources.
2-3 Considering the diversity of contributing causes for
flammable products in underground structures, protective
practices should be designed to reduce to a minimum the
quantity of flammable vapors. Where such vapors are
found to be present, a complete purge of the manhole or
vault atmosphere should -be made and the source of the
flammable vapors eliminated. Manholes and vaults should
be ventilated by forced draft when necessary to prevent
concentrations of these vapors within the explosive range.
After complete ventilation of the underground structure,
the atmosphere should be tested with a combustible gas
indicator before entering and before any hot work is per-
formed. A low reading on the combustible gas indicator
does not necessarily mean that the toxicity hazard has been
eliminated. Adequate ventilation should be maintained and
periodic gas analysis of _the atmosphere during any such
work should be made.
2-4 Detection Instruments. There are a number of instru-
ments that can be used to detect unsafe atmospheres found in
underground structures. They should be used to determine
the characteristics of any questionable situation. Ensure that
instruments are properly calibrated before use.
2-4.1 Oxygen. There are indicators that give a direct
reading of oxygen concentration. Under no conditions
should an area be entered without self-contained breathing
apparatus unless it contains at least 19.5 percent oxygen.
2-4.2 Carbon Monoxide. This gas in concentrations
greater than 0.10 percent by volume results in uncon-
sciousness in little more than an hour and death in four
hours. Further increases in concentration reduce this time
element. Its effect is to displace oxygen in the blood
stream. Several instruments have been developed for the
quick detection of carbon monoxide. Those capable of
detecting the smallest concentrations considered hazard-
ous are the carbon monoxide tester (palladium-molybdate
complex) and the carbon monoxide indicator.
24.3 Hydrogen Sulfide. This flammable and toxic gas is
colorless and has an odor resembling rotten eggs. It is toxic
in concentrations above 0.002 percent by volume. Contin-
ued exposure will paralyze the olfactory nerves. The
1992 Edition
�Y
4�—' /
Date: January 6,1996 N e�4) /7" a 110 MA'^J
��o
N S? �v1�U�� C�
To: Jeannine Graf, Building OfficialN
From: Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshalp 1(3 20 7-
Subject: Sunset & Main Building, 110 Main street
i��wpn3�'y'
�A
After review the fire department has the following comments: BuS �w �6- Oc1PT
1. Relocate the emergency lights on the second floor:
• SE stair.. locate light at center of south wall. Y
• Center stair.. locate light to center of south wall. p� ; ` !-f�'�'�� co+V� *ctSS ice= iN
• East / West corridor.. locate light on north wall approximately four feet from the corner of PSG
and the west wall.
v/ 2. Relocate fire department key box to the Main street entrance.
3. Provide plans of fire alarm system for review.
4. Provide one additional fire extinguisher cabinet and extinguisher approximately 4 feet east of
door # 221.
5. Relocate the fire extinguisher shown by door # 109 to the wall near door # 106.
6. Locate fire alarm pull stations near egress doors.
7. Fire alarm audible alarm shall be a minimum of 60 dba or 15 dba above ambient in all
occupied locations of the building.
8. All fire extinguishers shall be a minimum of 2,A-10,B:C dry chemical type.
EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
word.BP95-190DOC
MEMORANDUM
DATE %/),Ol q5 LD.
�1 �� g�.4�,v� AsSc3C,
REPORTED BY Yrl LG ) 44 n� "`� OF � 36 -6 Z3-1]-
SUBJECT ,
ADDRESS: A
D fA7/J S _
HAZARDS f f tJ(Jl/ CA'✓
FOLLOW-UP:
SIGNED
Office of Fire Prevention
SIGNED
TANK SERVICES NORTHWEST, INC.
Spaclaffets In sommo rank And FuW Problems
20360 Paradise Lake Road NE
Phone (208) �88-8418 p Woodinville, WA WAS.M21 • FAX
(2D6) 788-7086
Spill ROPO4M • LwP8 tiaa Abaadonauar • T�.k & Fuel CJaeaiag • Si, Asscmrpemr • IF(1 C'aufied
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANING CERTIFICATION
DATE: July 12, i m
T 3z -a�o�
j)qN sz-J
CUSTOMER: Custom Backhoe & Dumptruck Service
13032 SE 45th Court
Bellevue, WA SOM
TANK ADDRESS: I 110 Main Street
Edmonds, WA
CONTfWs: UST #1: 1,000 gallons Qasollne
UST #2: 1,000 gallons Gasoline
CER1IF1CATt0!i: Tank Services Northwest, Inc. certifies that the two 1,0001allon
gasoline tanks at the above bCWlon ("Tank Address") were properiy
pumped out and cleaned (triple washed) on the above date.
Iareraa 0" Fire Code lamtute C,&rd6ed Underground Storage rank SuPcrviaom ad Sire Ammrs
W"AwSmn $uu G=CX11 C,t)AV=0,r't Lamm No, TANKS M aV QH
CITY OF E D M O N D S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 MAYOR
FIRE DEPARTMENT
February 19, 1988
Mr. John Wiatrak
Electrical Inspection Division
8625 Evergreen Way
Everett, WA 98208-1801
Dear Mr. Wiatrak,
I am requesting that two buildings within the City of Edmonds
receive safety inspections from your division. In both cases fire
department personnel have been aware of substantial electrical work
being done without permit. In both cases we have had repeated con-
tacts with owners requesting that they obtain electrical permits but
none has been obtained. The two commercial occupancies are:
1. Edmonds Pet and Feed
Woo, Kenneth T., Owner
21904 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98020
774-6226
2. Okerberg Products
Lindh, N. O., Owner
110 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
778-5225
Please advise me when these inspections are scheduled so that a
fire department representative can assist on the inspection.
GLM:be
cc: Building Dept.
Sincerely,
Gar McComas
Fire Marshal
INCORPORATED AUGUST 1 1 .1890
110 1VI41N ST
NORWESTING BOAT NEWS/
OKERBERG PRODUCTS r
SCALE F=20'
N
NORWESTING
BOAT
LIFTING NEWS
WOOD
DOOR
y
SLIDING
1 C UNTE WOOD
DOOR
G 0FFICE`S
SL ----- --SL-- -----
PLYWOOD I-j
COVERED L AV'S STORAGE ; PL
-_______ PASS THRUM
' ATTIC DOOR
N^TE 0
SKYLIGHT STRUCTURE S: i �c
' I SLIDING
IS C )RRUGATE.D b WOOD
FIBERGLASS
20'
8,
oloi
- ,
;s:
` F OFF.
__.._OKERBERG
PRODUCTS
DOOR
15` �
/T-
STORAGE
LOFT
.-SLIDING
WOOD
DOOR
M►�R`
110 MAIN ST
N O RW E S T I N G BOAT
OKERBERG PRODUCTS
SCALE F=20'
N
LIFTING
WOOD
DOOR
.4
NORWESTING
BOAT
NEWS
�SLIDING
WOOD
LDOOR
G OFFICE'S
PLYWOOD — i i F 1< I -- — T
COVERED LAV'S—' _ STORAGE ;
PASS T H R U
ATTIC DOOR
NOTE 0
SKYLIGHT STRUCTURE '
S' - SLIDING
IS CORRUGATED
FIBERGLASS
20
l%7
WOOD
DOOR
S: S: SE. 15
lot
' OFF STORAGE;
LOFT
—____._—_OKERBERG .—SLIDING
PRODUCTS WOOD
DOOR
ti
/h 4 eN _J�'iz_ �?vN Cam/ `/'IZ�T_Jr—
v
---=-----��1�CgF7-__, - ----- -=------- -
-- � -��----I-�D-Cif�Tlbr►� __ t�Uiv_�dw-1'c9`� -- 5'- G�--- `'yALI_._�_ _ /�2E5S--�--s'Q`—'`� -- - - —.
------------- — - - -- -
IV eA � ES77w<— -
/Q0.05.--
4a4zr"
�!2cf-
i—
vN,cirzE evDE A6E c,_)U,le- F;,jrs
eNl-
s
_ � �� (4 /'�'��-(-�E�-�� . - �/r�C�C /Y7l/j/!/Y[ tJ/h R�'q c�.� /zc ��•7c� i'S 9iE'�
- o got--_ P /2a v 11� c}> >gr� /yr a9 �i•> '�' ��✓ � Y i�'E o w ��� 0 2
--" O P�'12-_A-7v �Z c�� .9-G�- _ _�_US �/`�cSS c 5 �...ocFi- � ���.� -rj{�'__er�r aF_ ��?,�•��f,