1306 OLYMPIC VIEW DR.PDF1306 OLYMPIC
VIEW DR
l
• INTER -OFFICE COMMLOCATIONS
TO
FORM 41 - LITTLE'S
STREET FILE ( DATE May 8, 1972
Harry Whitcutt
Building Official
FROM Bill Nims
Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Storm Sewer Inspection o Convenient Store Parking Lot.
A final inspection was made on May 8, 1972, of the additional storm
sewer work on the private parking lot of the Convenient Store. The
catch basin and storm line are working correctly due to the asphalt
edge placed to channel surface run-off into the catch basin. The
entire storm system is hereby approved from an engineering stand-
point.
40 WJN:mlf
INTER -OFFICE COMM I&ICATI O;NSSTRE;ET FILE
ATE.. April 'i 19 79
TO FROM,��
Engineering Department
Building,,;Mepartmeht
e.
FORM 41 - LITT E'S
Th. ra
SUBJECT: Convenience Stores Permit #710397
•
Please reinspect the storm drainage provision at the above and advise
this Department if it is now acceptable.
Ya u Mug r PA-m i i-i Ave- w /-rw -rwt s P1, v*r r-,
Ct4 urv- A-® WS15-
IN -OFFICE COMMSICAI&NS
1
Harry Whitcutt
-�PLeif Larson
TO John Wallace
FORM 41 - LITTLE'S
SUBJECT:
IV 0
DATE November 21,
FROM Ron Whaley, M. A. A.
19 73
Mr. and Mrs. Jane Cunningham -VS North End Convenience Store VS
The City of Edmonds.
Today by telephone, I had a long conversation with Mr. Cunningham
listing all of the things that the City has not accomplished and
are obligated (?) to do in connection with this construction project.
Those things pertain'to site improvements and drainage.
Please let me know in writing what you believe the present status
to be relating to permits, obligation of the City, and work to.be
performed and/or completed by the City and/or store owners.
Ron Whaley 3
RW/jh
cc Mayor Harrison
S'ROY,
L �
c v R t T- REP ak r—
IIVO IC�47-/" G IXIH `}T ai / 5 o ,.
ADDRESS: O
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:_
PERMITS (OTHER):_
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
LOT:
LID #:
BLOCK:
LATEMP\DST's\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc
, jo
ef
rr !A4 P
fb
7T •� ��
° n Al z
1 }
O <. 0
c m z fx . �•, g x.
06
s!
(o Oco M
br tt^. ^r C 15 ' ,, -, ;_A •,' AC,
* sA!i
an
-T 7 ID
�.
ry
of
.a
ur
CD
y
i' s r-r ar'- Y �t
ZZ
J `+' Yi•n +' '�,' .fit''+ n. r 0P
+� S1 rn
H N �.{,% a i rTr7 , Y��yp
.*i 7. P Fes•► @'xW' > N O O�r �'Q W
y .
"aa+a1 .., 0
kip •t � ,ij1„� • e Na yy,��,� ,+�
�.w''! It �' ,, :Q+ (� y� �`• 4 �r
4 , 4 •
Mr. Rex Strioktand
1800 Otprio View Drive
FcSsonds, Washington 90020
Dear Mr. StrioKand:
Deoeneber 7, 19?3
Re: Convenient Store Property
Punruant to Counoil request, rolative to storm dmin-
age on your prapsrty, an on site field inepsotion was oonduoted
by th�ds depart t. The results of the lnspeotlon are at
MUMS:
t. Permission was given verbally to oonnduot the
inspeotion on private property.
8. the inspeotion was om*wtred on November 28,
Ufa, using a garden hose to treats surface floes
on the asphalt parking tot.
S. The direotion of water flow is indioated on
the attaohsd sketch.
!. P'fft percent of the water flows into the oatoh
basin at the northwest corner. Forty Percent of the
eater flows around the asphalt berm along the drive-
way and oontinues westbound along the south shoulder
of Or�sw. About ZO peroent of the water seeps
through the fens along the west property tine. This
000urs in the area where the asphalt mised edge doss
not eacist.
rt is, therefore, requested that the asphalt raised edge
along the west property tine be oorreoted to create flow easterly
to the oatoh basin. rf you have any questions, please aontaot
this orfios.
Fours very truly,
MY OF 9DWSM117
LSrF R. URSOR
City Xnginesr
YJF: LRL:µor
Attaohwent
oo: Mr. d Mrs. Cunninghaw
60--
Dece>wbesr 49 1973
Key" PAVVUM
9 City Council
MXt Leif R. Urson
City Ensineer
SUW=t Drainage Problaw - Worth Egad Convenient Store and Cunningham
Pursuant to Coil action, of November 27th regarding the
subject drams probleta, the following ohronelogical events
are supplied for your infosr ration t
1. A drainage Wotan was &wriped for the property as part
of the development's engineering requirement.
3. A was dated November 29, 1971, to the file indicates
the drainage was not installed according to their pleat.
9. On April 139 1972, a mom to this depwtwsnt fan the
building department asked us to reinspect the store drainage
system.
4. A final Inspection was wade on Nay S. 19721, which included
some additional work. The drainage system was approved per
move to building !leparteerst.
S• ft C s19 GZlenco
ing of Deaeasiber► 12, 1972. Mrs. Cunninghgo
and dratuage. gineeming was to look
at the 4=1n ; d ins inspection thewas no significant
runoff to the Culttnshaw propan "O
6. On Movesiber 209 1978, an Inspection was a gde. We received
pomission from the Store and tom. Omminghaw to use the
video tape, We than conducted a test using a garden hcse to
create surfae s ruoff as It was a clear dry day. Results of
the test we provided, an the attached drawing and the film
Is stored at the Police Departaent for future use.
7. The Engineering, Dc�nt recowNantde that the property owner
place adl deal asphalt to ornate a berm that will allow
the water to flew easterly to the catch basin.
LRLtajr
'At4at
Ir.
I NSPECTION M Aue W iTN dW Naas 'P l56ION LIS N 6
TeISUte1�N \11()eo Tyr P E 6N \N Ca NON/ 28,14ar7
.su R .OAIC.E Rau N a FF
5 as/I. CAN AINFQ ON ?Qom �N FLOWS lNro M.
q. oala l= Lom Wesr" PD oN GeAN VIE W ALORG ! fftoQ OBIZ
4d=� O.
FLOW
' ?R BL.Em AQUA
A5 P AUT R
ISTINU
a � f� I V E RECbWM �p
r•
OF
w T LOW
oP-
'Qaor DrmI N _
J
di
WIT4 ?1Pf � • "--� G�3 �'
u.I�1Q�L51 P�v�rlt.K [� .
OLYfv'TIC VIEW DR. 30
r
�.
-5-
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
DECEMEER 4, 1973
STREET FILE
until the Amenities Design Board is in operation. Motion carried.
OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEW COUNCILMAN KENNETH WELLING
City Attorney James Murphy administered the oath of office to newly
appointed councilman Kenneth Welling. Councilman Welling then took
his seat at the council table.
DRAFT OF MASTER PLAN FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
Kay Shoudy, Assistant Planner and the staff advisor to the Shore-
lines Advisory Committee, told council that this plan had been
presented to the Planning Commission at their November 14 meeting.
The Planning Commission had moved that the plan be forwarded to the
City Council with the recommendation that council forward the docu-
ments to the State of Washington for review. Mrs. Shoudy noted that
the plan must go to the State Department of Ecology by December 20.
She then introduced the Committee members: Howard Lovering, Chair-
man; Sara Whitmore; Drew Miller; Gerry Geschke; George Grant;
Margaret Johnson; Ed Robinson.
Howard Lovering then began an explanation of the program
At this point, it was determined that items 9 and 10 on the agenda,
review of the plat of Parkview Firs and a report on the Jane
Cunningham property, be taken up in order to clear the agenda and
be ahle to devote the remainder of the evening to the Shorelines
Master Plan.
COUNCIL REVIEW - FINAL PLAT OF PARKVIEW_FIRS
City Planner Joe Wallis presented the new plan submitted for Park -
view Firs in the Five Corners area. He explained there was no
change in density between the old and new plans, and showed color
slides of the plans and the area. City Planner Wallis noted that
this was a definite improvement over the original plan, and recom-
mended council approval of the plan as modified. It was moved by
Councilman Nordqui,.t, seconded by Councilman Anderson that council
accept the plan of Parkview Firs, as modified. Motion carried.
REPORT ON JANE CUNNINGHAM PROPERTY
City Engineer Leif Larson reported that his office had inspected
this problem and used video tape for recording. They found drain-
age leaking onto the Cunningham property, and the only way to
correct the situation is to install a berm and raise the asphalt
where the low spots result in puddling; also to redirect the flow
of the drainage water to the catch basin on the northwest side of
the store. Engineer larson made this recommendation and advised
�y his office would wr JAI! a lr,t.ter, to the jore property owners,
Ef' advising them of these requirements.
MASTER PLAN FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT = CONTINUED
Howard Lovering, Chairman, reported on the master program, which
responded to the state requirements, and stated that the committee
hoped the council would send it on to the State Department of
Ecology by the due date of December 20. He added that the plan is
a general, comprehensive one with long range proposals and guide-
?fnes. The committee had to respond to the guidelines of the state
as we33 as taking into consideration the citizens' desires. It
conformed to the natural environment and its relationship to the
multiple uses of shorelines. George Grant explained that the re-
rs"i A1,4STRUT FILF
' EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 27, 1973
-2-
/Mrs. Jane Cu-iningham, 1030 Grandview, stated that she has again come to council
asking for h3lp with a drainage situation near her home. She appeared before
council on t.:e 12th of December, 1972 regarding the same matter. 11rs. Cunningham
read a portion of the minutes of that date, wherein she had explained the
problem of drainage, etc. She said the city did put in extensive drainage
down the street, so that her neighbors, to Phillips' and the Herbs no longer
have a problem. She said the not drainage ha:, not been taken care of and is
still emptying down the back of the convenience store. Mrs. Cunningham also
said that not::ing has been done to the berm, so that water is not directed to
the catch basin. Councilman Gellert mentioned that he had stopped and looked
at the area in question, and that he did note standing puddles of water. There
was some discussion, and following this the Mayor asked the City Engineer to
look into the matter. Councilwoman Shippen asked that the engineer report
back to council next week.
CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION RETURIIS - MUNICIPAL FLECTION Hrr.'LD NOVEMBER 6, 1973
Deputy City Clerk, Eleanor Quealey, notified council that the certified election
returns had been received from the County Commissioners Office. They were
as follows:
COUNCIL POSITION #1
Absentees
Donald S. Tuson
4,560
225
Gordon L. Gogert
2,198
86
COUNCIL POSITION #2
Max Gellert
3,185
169
Greg Selvidge
3,111
136
COUNCII. POSITION #3
Robert A. Anderson
4,494
218
Michael D. Parmelee
2,375
96
HEARING: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LID 191 - SEWERS, SOUTH 01' MEADOWDALE JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL.
COUNCIL ESTABLISH INTEREST RATE ON BONDS MP r,rn 1qi
Hearing was held on Final Assessment Roll for LID 191. City Engineer, Leif
Larson, reported that the Preliminary Assessment Rol] Hearing was held on the
6th of Mnrch nrid thy+ prr+liminnr7 un:timatn wnri 'I�;��;,',�,U nrid th,� zonh front foot
oont won orit;lnuntnd ut 1<i').iS';. At, I hnt lil!Ni ing th,• nuthorized tho
City to partir:ipnte l(//,, in tl"- L.II). The 1illol 1,I1i collt to 9V)4,859 with n
zone front foot cort of 114.05. At this point Mr. Larr3on explained the
zone terminii method following a request from a gentleman in the audience.
The hearing was then opened.
Mr. Ackerman, residing at 17005 - 67th Avenue West, said that he could not
understand why his assessment figure was higher than some of his neighbors
that had the same size property he has. Mr. Larson said that he would be
glad to go over the matter in detail with Mr. Ackerman. Another gentleman
in the audience said that he would like to speak for a neighbor, but Mr. Larson
told him that he was aware of this situation and that the matter has already
been resolved. No one else wished to speak, and the hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Councilman Nelson and seconded by Councilman Anderson
to pass Ordinance #1686 approving and confirming the final assessment and
assessment roll for LID 191, and that the council affirm the 6.5116 interest
rate.on the bonds. The motion carried unanimously.
YPC M ICHAEL W. HERB
ATTORNEY AT LAW
CASSELL BUILDING
.19730-64I1i WEST, SUITE 201
P. 0. BOX 694
LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036
TELEPHONE 774-7744
September 26, 1972
Mr. Bill Nim s
City of Edmonds Engineering Department
Edmonds Civic Center'
Edmonds, Wash. 98020
Dear Bill:
S EP 27 1972
CITY CF ED,�140NDS
BY
Thank you for coming to the property on September 22nd and I know
you had a long day, and I wanted to let you know I appreciate your
coming over. I also welcomed your suggestion that we have a berm
installed at the turn -around point to divert water into the catch basin.
Very truly yours,
MIC HAEL W . HERB
MWH:ts
• ' STREET, FILE
T�DiiOPdDS CITY COUNCIL rIRFO`i'ES
D :CEi yI R 12, 1�72 -
�d by Councilman Tuscon to confirm the appointment
Councilman Nordqui.st and serondc
of Phil Averill to, the Civil Service Commission. l'hi:i motion also' carried with
Councilwoman Shippen abstaining.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Mrs. Jane Cunningham, 1030 Grandview was in the audience and wished to.bring to
the attention of the council some problems in connection with a convenience store
located near her home. She passed out a sketchindicating the location of a fence
.ham stated that there was supposed to be a 6 ft.
and catch basins, etc. Mrs. Cunningham
r less than that in
fence pu
t ;
in behind the store, but actually it _-.� 5 feet an
d le
some areas. Mole. are no
e neath the fence and bringing up dirt,
now.working . g underneath
which is undermining . the fence and bulkhead
.
She said there are many 5
heavy delivery
trucks coming in behind the store. and i••irs. Cunningham wonders if the bulkheads can
stand this kind of weight.. A further problem is the drainage. She stated that
there is drainage from the rear, the roof, but the slope of the blacktop. is such
that not too much of this water goes into the catch basin. Some of the drainage
goes down to, Mr. Phillips house and some 'down the driveway to a catch basin in
front of Mr. Herbs garage. Mrs. Cunningham is concerned that this. drainage will
come into her ,,yard when the blacktop starts breaking along the fence line. It
is her feeling that�the convenience store should be required to correct the situation
and itshould. not be the responsibility -of' the adjoining.property owners.- Councilman
Tuson asked Assistant City Engineer, Richard Allen, what could. be done to correct
this problem. Mr. 'Allen said he. had reviewed the drainage situation and said
that the Engineering Department.has recommended that the owner be contacted and
asked to divert the,roof drainage and make repairs as soon as the weather, is
favorable. Mr. Allen said we do not h .ve any ;:pecifi.cations for parking lot.
asphalting, but they did require the containment.of the drainage. The original.
plans .had called for drainage to come around to the front of the .building.: They
had placed a berm there, but it is not working. After some discussion, it was
sue(-ested by Councilman Gellert that pr:rhaps there should be a place on the Occupancy
Permit for an Engineering sign-off'and he recommended this. Councilwoman Shippen
asked who is responsible 'or the maintenance of thr. fence. City Attorney Murphy
stated that since this is the zoning; lizio between ;;inglc-family and bu:.i.n.c3s, the
city can require that the business keep the fence in repair. I?ollowi.ng more.
discussion, Mayor Harrison asked Mrs. Cunninj;}zam whrlt ::he wanted the city to, do
about this problc rn. She an. o-✓ered that f:he on]_y long range sohztion would be to
redo the back and rut. ill a concrete: bulkh(:aci that is above the level of the ground
find have the drainage fully con
C.i.ty At• t of ri - y Murphy r;u:id i t' t}�r;. ciruinn�o
ir; not working it would anparently have to be redone. With regard to the bulkhead
and the .fence, it was thought that this could be watched anc1 if' it becomes damaging
to the neighbor, the matter could be reviewed at a later time. After further
d Mr. Allen to keep an e�-c on the situation.
discussion, Mayor Harrison aske
CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor. Harrison said he had a letter from the Highway Commission in answer to his
letter to them regarding the construction of a full diamond interchange .at I-5
and 220th. The Highway Comission stated that addiional ramps at 220th would
m
cause weaving conflicts with the ramps at 2�6th. `I'::ey said this proposal would
he considered fa•✓ora� 1y only .if the 36th :-tre -A, rrhrr;, were removed..: To date,
Mountlake T'errac:c has not af..-T.•eed -to remove. t',e ;_'36.ti" Street ramp:,. '14ayor Harrison
said that perhaps the next e.}'fort should be :'or the City of i;dmonds to urge the
City of Mountlake Terrace to remove the ramrs at 236th Street. A. motion was then
made by Councilman Gellert and seconded by Councilmian Tuson to encourage the Mayor
to seek the cooperation of 1.1ountlake Terrace for the best solution to freeway
acc-e.ss at 220th or 236th. Motion carried.
.METRO TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL
✓ , :' Department, stated that he is a member o.f.
the Edmonds �.,n incc,ring De, � ,
I Bill dims with b
the South Snohomish County Transit Hoard and has worked with the Metro people
- m for Edmonds with
with ash equitable arrangement for several weeks to come up .
regard to,public transportation. He* felt we would be pleased :rich the proposal
to be submitted tonight. He t'r.en iraroduced Larry Coffman, Director of Transit
with Metro.. Mr. Coffman :hated that in previous'tal.ks Metro had been attempting
to deal with each city individually, wl✓ cre+:is now they are thinking of Snohomish
STREET FILE
Edmonds Doard of ,Adjuatnu�nt - Rcjfu,lar, Meeti•ni, - July 2'4, 1-972 - Page 2
who can then grant.a two year extension. However that time has now been used up and
any extension of the plat must.come from the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Logan explained.
that a developer can develop two ways: once the preliminary plat has been approved
he may provide performance bonds and get the plat recorded and go ahead with develop-
ment; or the developer himself can do the improvements and would probably take sever-
al years for development. The City of Edmonds has held up this development so it was
Mr. Logan's recommendation that the Board grant a two year extension to the proposed
plat that would start after completion of the drainage system -this fall.
Mr. Allen asked'if the plat would be approved at this time as it was submitted? Mr.
Logan said he did not think the design would change and onlyundergrounding grounding was re-
quired now that had not been required when it as submitted. However, undergrounding
was imposed on the plat in 1970 when it was granted,a two year extension.
It was moved by Mr. Grant, seconded by Mr. McQuade that V-21-72 be approved for a two
year period beginning with the completion of the Five Corners Storm Sewer System, as
the delay was not caused by the applicant, but by the City of Edmonds. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
V-22-72 B 6 H Grocery, 1306 Olympic. .'Variance to allow ]0 foot wall'in required
�r 20 foot rear yard setback..
Ic
Mr. McGibbon read a letter in the file from Harry Whitcutt, Building Official recom-
mending consideration be given to this application. A letter was also in the file
from Harris F. Freedman 6 Associates outlining what has been done to contain .the
noise at the B 6 H Grocery, and what they are now proposing to do.
Mr. Logan said this variance request is not much different from the one that was
granted in March when the petitioners asked to construct a•roof in the rear yard
area. The roof extended 5 feet.into the rear yard area and this request is for 6`
feet, or one foot further into the rear yard area than existing wall. The wall
height would be approximately 2 -feet more, but Mr. Logan said he did not feel that
the additional height or the one extra foot into the rear yard would offer an increased
problem. There is now a 6 foot fence across the rear of the property, which is 8
.feet on the neighbor's side, so visual impact would be negligible. Mr. Logan said i
was his -recommendation that the variance. request g t
t be granted
d as i t --
does not
a physical constitute
p y problem to the adjacent property.
Wade James, architect for Convenience Stores said they are well aware of the fact
that the neighbors to the west, the Cunninham's, have experienced noise difficulties,,
but they have worked hard in trying to solve the problem and .feel that the wall should
cut the noise down. Mr. James said that Mr. Freedman believes the construction of
the wall will reduce the noise level to 40 decibels.
Mr. McGibbon said the drawings show that the wall is to be open on the south end.
Mr. James said yes, there is a wooden wall there now which should control the noise
in that location. There would be a concrete wall on the north and west side.
Harris F. Freedman, who is an acoustical engineer said that even a very low decibel
level, if it is constant, can be very annoying in the evening hours. Mr. Freedma
n
said they had.attacked the source of the worst
noise, which is the large compressor,
but could not ge
t
g close enough to the decibel level required by the City Ordinance.
He said they recognized the only way to get close to that level was to build a sound
absorbing wall between the grocery and residence next door. Mr. Freedman said that
40 decibels is an acceptable level to aim for, but when commercial property borders
on residential it is very hard to keep within this range: fie said he felt that
people building commercial buildings in the future should be made aware of the dec-f-
bel level allowed by the City. Buildings could be built with this provision in mind.
Mr. Freedman said in the Cunninham residence the bedrooms are on the other side of
the house away from the store and the noise level at that point would be between 37
and 38 decibels.
Mr. McGibbon asked if building this wall would get the decibel level to 40'andMr.
Freedman said he believed that it would be in the range of 38 to 42. He said that
would depend a lot on the expertise of the person installing the wall, However,..he
said 3 decibels is as close as anyone can hear and tell the difference.. He said
they would make extra effort to get the reading even lower. Mr. Freedman said also
Edmonds Board of Adjustment - Regular Meeting - July 24, 1972 - Page 3
that taking decibel readings in the same place, facinf* different directions can vary
,f the reading by several decibel.;. Traffic noises were measured in the middle of the
night at that location and ran from 35 decibels, which is no traffic, to 76 decibels,
averaging 56 decibels.
Walt Sellers, attorney representing; Mr. and Mrs. Francis Cunningham said they appre-
ciated the efforts that have been made to solves the problem, but they oppose the var-
iance, question whether it will solve the roblem, and is it according to the Zoning
e_ of the City of Edmonds and said the situ -
Code. Mr. Sellers reviewed the zoning cod'ation arose because no provisions were made prior to building. He said the owner of
the property should have made these provi,-lions prior to construction because they
knew that a grocery would be there. Mr. Sellers said that it was a rule of law that
no variance can be approved where it is a self-created hardship. In the past the
Board allowed a variance to enclose the machinery and that it has not helped. He
said his clients have sustained damage because of this constant and annoying noise.
Mr. Sellers said that the variance should not be granted and the machinery should be
put inside the building, then the problem would take care of itself. He said per-
mitted uses in Neighborhood Business zone states that there are 6 exceptions to the
entirely enclosed building provision and a grocery store is not listed as one of them.
A building means all exterior walls being solid except for windows and doors. Mr.
Sellers said that inside a building, you can baffle the sound and need no variance to
do so. There is substantial roof area and attic space in the store building to take
care of the machinery and noise. Mr. Sellers s,xid this: particular problem has con-
tinued since March and the neighbors would like to have it resolved. Mr. Sellers
said that: ]. the machinery is in violation of the variance granted in March for 30
days; 2. a variance is not necessary if machinery installed in building; 3. the var-
iance should not be permitted as it is a hardship created by people who constructed
the building; 4. have all solutions been explored as there is now just a little picket
fence around the machinery when it should be baffled.
Mr. McGibbon asked Mr. Sellers if he though denying the variance would be the quickest
way to solve the problem and he said he didn't know. Mr. McGibbon asked what objec-
tions there would be to the wall if it solved the problem. Mr. Sellers said there is
a rear yard requirement which should have been considered when the other building
addition was built.
Mr. James said that when the Convenience Stores building, application was made they
had a choice of rear yards. If they had faced Grandview, the same street as the
Cunninghams there would have been just a 5 foot side yard between the building and
the Cunninham property line.
Mrs. Cunningham said she was not convinced that the noise won't go over the wall. Mr.
Freedman said that the noise would go up and into the wall of the store from the roof
overhang. He said in the evening hours any noise not usual is very annoying even if
it was only 15 decibels. Mrs. Cunningham said if this variance was approved and it
doesn't meet the requirements, then what? Mr. McGibbon said that it then becomes an
enforcement problem. The Board of Adjustment could not go any further. The Cunning-
ham's would then have to go to the owner, the City or to Court.
Mr. Cunningham asked if the Convenience Store people are still obligated to the City?
Mr. Whitcutt said they were, and the time limit for the variance had been extended
because they have experienced hardships, but that the Building Department has not
issued a final on the building pending the solution of the noise problem.
Mr. Freedman said that the City of Edmonds lists 40 decibels as the acceptable noise
level, but that there are various scales and you would get a different reading with
each one.
Mr. Grant asked Mr. Freedman where they would go if this wall didn't work and he said
they could only completely enclose the equipment and make it part of the building.
Mr. Freedman said he has found solutions before in areas where there is a power comp-
any adjacent to a residence. fie said the machinery could be moved inside, but that
it is air cooled and would have to have openings to the outside. Even in the par-
tially walled area there is now, this feast week thvay have had temperatures of 1.35 de -
green and the compressors kick out or could burn out. Mr. Grant asked why they
couldn't put the compressors on the roof and face the machinery to the south. He
was told perhaps they could, but it would take much modification.
Edmonds Board of Adjustment - }?e ular Meeting - July 24,' 1972 - Page 4
/Mr. Sellers said the Board should decide that the variance is not needed as the mach-
✓ finery should be inside the building and there is no hardship which has not been
created by the builders, so there should be' no more encroachment into the rear yard.
Mr. Grant said he did not care about the yard area, only how to get rid of the noise.
He said the Cunningham's cannot see.the building so that the only hardship to them
is the noise.
Mrs. Rutter -asked about moving the machinery to another location. Mr. Whitcutt said
that it had been considered but it would be a massive change to the store and not
feasible. !4r. James said all the lines for the compressors Ire buried under, concrete
and it would be very expensive to move.
Lyle Call, a real estate agent in the audience told the Board of Adjustment that he
would like to see the variance granted as he thought it was a necessity to the neigh'
borhood and would be a terrible hardship to the property owners to have it denied.
Will Smith, 1057 Alder Street said he had not been aware of this case before, but
just from listening from the audience he wandered if they had considered putting in
two walls, one concrete and one wood, with a dead space between. Mr. Freedman said
they will be using a special acoustical block that is 8 inches thick and should do
the job.
Mr. McQuade asked if this does not work will they continue their efforts to control
the noise? Mr. Whitcutt said they have to get compliance.to the ordinance. Mr.
McQuade said he felt the owners were making a sincere effort to control the noise.
A motion was made by Mr. McQuade, seconded by Mrs. Rutter that V-22-72 be approved as
the variance will not change the neighborhood or create a hardship on the neighbors.
Mr. Grant and Mr. Allen voted "no" and 14r. McQuade and Mrs. Rutter voted "yes". Chair-
man :IcGibbon voted yes to break the tie and the variance was approved.
Ilyly
-19-72 John 11. Crump, 18902 94th W. Variance of 9% from the maximum driveway
grade of 14%.slope.'.
Mr. Logan explained that Mr. Crump had gone before the Planning Commission for a 3-lot
subdivision, but that it had been approved as a two lot subdivision unless he could
obtain access.'to the lower lot from Olympic View Drive. Mr. Crump had investigated
the possibilities of }raining access through the properties on Olympic View Dr.ive,.had
not been able to doso and had come back to the Planning Commission on July 19th.
The Planning Commission had reconsidered and granted the 3-lot subdivision subject.to
the granting of a variance on the driveway restrictions from the Board of Adjustment.
A revised drawing had been presented showing the locations of the driveway which is
to be included in the footage of Lot 3. "4r. Logan said the Planning, Commission had
stipulated that an engineer's drawing be recorded with the property title showing
the steepness,of the driveway grade. The staff has been concerned over -the inaccessi-
bility of the lot, and in particular the_Fire Department as they feel obligated to ,
look after future owners as well as present. The Planning Commission tries to pro
vide guide lines so that property hays per.�manent long term valuation end whether or.
not the present owners will accept a problem is not the issue, but the future is to
be protected. Mr. Logan said City standards are that Street sope will not exceed 200
and driveway slope will not exceed 14%. tie said this lot creates a number of problems
but that the owner thinks it is a desirable lot and it is for the view. 'Ir. Logan
said the Fire Chief has said that when there is a fire on an easement such as this he
will not drive the fire truck in unless there is an awful lot of open space, which
there isn't in this case. They would leave the truck on the street and lay hose.
Service vehicles, moving vans, etc. would all have problems. When the roads.are
slippery the other owners in the area all park on the street. Ir. Logan said if the
property owners are willing to accept these hardships, then the City would have to
accept building at that location. '(r. Logan said he recommended the variance be
approved with these recommendations: 1. A concrete drive 10 feet wide with surface
treated to improve traction in wet weather as approved by the City Engingeer. 2.
There should be a 2 car parking space, paved, on the west side of 94th Ave. W. about
46 feet lonff and 8 feet wide and approved h-,r the City Engineer. Ir. Logan said there
v he north of the existing driveway. Mr. Grant asked
is already 4 feet of paving to t g Y
Y
P
r would
if. the parking area could be in and a fill made. Mr. Logan said that 1
have to be up to the City Engineer. Mr. Loryan said that cutting and filling would
have to be done to get the parking area level as the land slopes to the west and to
the north.
STREET FIEF
no toll
um t
rums utIt. UW
City t
su t stwoft V sit i *" s *t O (film vto
tt to r tmt tbo 4,tt egait Ot tho
v"k Mott" of N " 300 1*7 *ad pub40 tbs 440vu ift tho
�
lill"t b" 00
rare► jos tiow to this 4 " ttu is tb* attsood Outtbo
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
505 BELL STREET
EDMONDS$ WASHINGTON 98020
APPLICATION FOR STREET USE PERMIT
(Submit in Triplicate)
Wamr of Applicant: ����3��_(�j�L��SP�� I &G �
IX-script.ion of Public Place or Portion Thereof Desired to be, .used:
(l:xh i.b.i t: may be attached) ,
...-..r_..i� w <
Type of On-c desired to be Made of Public Place:
7�
71• Applicable, Attach Plans and Specifications For Any Utility or Structure to be
Erected and/or Maintained on the Public Place:
Exhibi r or brawing Nos: ?L-A tJ -
Teen � ara . Permit:
Un.ler ,- c4herw.i se designated herein, this permit is understood by applicant to be
wholly of a temporary nature, that -it vests no permanent right whatsoever. If the
permitted use 'becomes dangerous or such structure shall become insecure or unsafe,
ov shall riot he constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions
of ttri.;; title, tine same may be revoked and the structure and obstructions ordered
MIrnc W!d l)y order of the City Engineer. If this application is for a specific
1-W r i ot.i of t.imea , the term of said application is:
.1 rldc malty:
Applicant. understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the
City r. f C.btjonus harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or des-
r.1' +t ic:-r, wtint:.oeve.r, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant
r)r• t.W.., 1 •.,•'- t: t: Edmonds, or. any of its departments or employees, including but not:
I in,i o. .,, to tile defense of any legal. proceedings including., defense costs, court
and attorney fees.
^A -xi ic.at.ior of Chapter 6.40 of the Edmonds City Code:
0.i.,,.i i c nt warrants that he has read, or had the opportunity to read, Chapter 6.40
„t t hr, L-.icno nor. City Code, and understands that all terms of that Ordinance are
in.. irerein as is set forth in full .and this application and permit there-
furc- ar, iihjeect to -the terms of that Chapter of the Edmonds City Code.
Signs ure of Applicant
r •
City of Edmonds A Recation for Street Use Permit
r
Name of Applicant:
Street Address:
City:
Date:
A22roval (and Agreement, if A licable) of Abutting Property Owner(s):
Signature s Address
DO NOT WRITE .BELOW 'THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
Date of City Council Approval:
Permit fee: Annual Fee ,due January 1, 19
Provision for Indemnity:
Terms and Provision of Performance Bond If Applicable:
Note: Reference 6.40.050 of the applicable Ordinance)
Additional Conditions lm osed U on and Agreed to by Applicant:
Approved by:
City Engineer Date
Approved by:
(If applicable) Building Official Date
Permit Issued: Permit Number:
Date
Applicant has read the foregoing,, application and eon,d t 1 s 'af approval of this
;Permit, fully understands `'and. a&ees to all', p-6 d'�lt dt s ` of the foregoing, applica-
,tiori 'and -'permit ,.approval, andby_ the d3c�'c�t 6jv of ,his signature hereto agrees to
..
io'
J
1
IZ-10 TU: i!ayor 11'arvj "ar: 1 ;on
+
and Ca.Ly i;01,1116.1
FRO,1: -Leif .:. Larson
c,
WLy
SUBJEG'A': S,:reet il0e Peclit L,oi G nvuni�_;it ;t_,Irc v .. C:1yMpic 'Ji.fs' Dr.
and arm dyic''
It i1-CgUC; tc(1 that Lile
)-c-,'Lowed .:,t the
work mectinG of Uuvcviou - 3G, 1(" 71 , ,;nd i, i acQL!
f.)n Lit(: aocnda for the
"
Decemb'er 7, 1971., cuuncti rr�ctAn;,. The ::n••i;ucrin,^,
DcParr.iaent h_i no
ob jectiunc to Lids ; ro;,or,al an c ut!Arc:l li,,
ottacbr_,d sketch'
I,aLiiaj I
,
'
Attaclimcnt
•
a
igg
-
t . ; a _ .. 4
W , * -, d 1'� Y 3� S k See' e S
"Ik'
�; x.. 4_
a.I r a aY > —, D111117-1 ry�" P ,
I r s % v` ,q",y
11
, a 11 i' -� s� z x & f ,ot .
a
4r : i. t a v
a a w s z k s
w Y v}� .� ems' a . �,
N ff a F _ q, r i' z .., a' d-4. x' ,�
�Il
r'fy, i z.,' ,.ham d:. yy�(� a > _ i .;F
d '"' t t:; , p �NW'� JaIIE� z r ft. 1 zn {'' ,� ""iw 6r 3*� z " . - i
11
r ', if"t ,. ��.`. �4 t pits is �' }` 'W,r ioG'"S`'�'"""d,y„ at. xi f�"''
.11
+/ A '+ rk
.,rs r'�. ��,^ - t si "s`s.' ti. a 6 sv a,f _ w a
s t
,,. aE� _ cIII ,` ^ i
. '.,. S n' 611 z Y )g } '
##ee , t I,. ,
i # , 3 y' i, 4}� . , a z
a
,1} 3 4 „� E a S. d +.fix �" 'F
V " _ � , _� �T
Olt,
'000'p'wo
$ il:l �j IE
4 +t .. 4 k s '�Mr�.�r z� N' b _1 g V i Y- -TES ' { y t F� „ 4
p Y b $ ax' t .'r
F` T F tom; av .. ,k {t K Ee $ a x t
z.- °" f `� a di ,,yy Est �^ ```' rot"` Y
11 �Si A 'G', 5y,. 1 kill- Iq f h b
li,
1.
f"
v r `` I'y Oki a',... �r : S.r 1'"'„a+r;, "['S`^.r^,} �o t, z..c
a
, at",E, i � �,,B : 7 't � �t w k. � , tt �.� �a K /.ri � �.�' i-k:. y "
4 ON,k; is +& s`
ll
_ .°_" i k.- I - l t� . '. s -ia P6 *t 3, y, 1�. i R -�' � �.'� }, ;r ti p �s }r# ^ t' q} x"'i
ji s y 4 } �$ ` €i ; l F a{ t , ,
xqk ,m a � f tK2� r, � ,� sst , t , zn } e z #
w ,�11111 au s '; zq,, `x�t ,t' 4 a s t f ' �, y. z, t, �, '!°'x4at i°' t_ ,.o i d •� .aEh
t.
T`' ;;, �* _ 11, z keg .,vhv `�drx,�, �. �»r-.ay.z.a* 4�s.,n}�„,, ,,k,Re,q.''�.Sz*',nw,�nr't"., a.,ra'.xid'; '.
� ".� ;u )'�i ,i -,y y >, yrS ,ycµ i".y� - x a� a s "l, )d C ,�, r+ # r .-, a ,,; �,.5 E l �s :y qLE vy... r
e ; x[y +y7 d 'k i s d7 < a i z' V 7 ba �,"" i ;. +r "r
a -^% az 111, 1, ll�� t,1 >nx7 s �'P.,.: '11, I ,tt/ ,4 ` ��5: "� ''1 ,' Ex` nt« i a' a
ia. " ), iSIA ' . � "Yx3
s xA r 6 fixa,# t r d° �sx v;r. s
y < ^Z t Y � "os{("�,-;a ,y? ` � ,pryt <s e a � r".y, yx R, {, ,°',� ^
7 p r ', fs. y f _tf44, f v� `, ,,SE'., i'f"f1 «�wG. T4 j 4 E g
li
`, v f - d e
�^� 1w 4 .r.1 11t KLs'3 I'll E 1 X ^!'Yi ios'E x t 94 S L 't" r "' _; f a, -_
t� a s i k :
+°' :,d r x^ t `F xiEE.4 } x Y Y -L 2 f
,,I a � ` s Yr r %— , ll�� t ,;t t &,' F x
1 . 'I I I � I ,�� 7%
h "�- c93� r d is `<'+' 7 % ; '" 5 9f %` s A .. e
! r� w.. y a , .` d,, d s `x , e 4 e' .� r y a. �� 7y E .,
I A Y Y S �µ to yJ t
1.s<s x %z �+ � � t f ' 4r t ¢ a , �,'; + � ,li '"
s" r %X T*k'aj'A '. ,f� rotj i p F4 YEi^ "" M, r a
sj� i ,
(r '� �t 4c <° s}t 4±' `� z o "" 9 t y k _ z .. C d' a
1 11 V P 1 8 X . �, 2 1 YA !Il '� r ,,, t
a t r _ , t
f"c
- R- Y ,� - '' .:
z" c ."a a t ,; ",1 ,, � S �#'. F
'5, �� E r "� '" s �a -n.. s r 'z a �-wE kz t~r
u z +�,
4,y. Alt a x t. A , 4r smk " s ;r s I'd r
i x s a 4, < zf �' r a -A a .-� , r11
i ' �y .� �: �. �,, .
;- ."ll lo 11
A 1 m y� ` :'' yyy� z- s t
a. tti AAt4 ,t r I --
1 +} 1, ,,, 's'
S! 'p I x K 2x ,o 6 x>
S{ &. "
..� r tEt t ' 1�' 'r c a:%h'z a a,� "
,
H • oI , x ,'
j
t
r
v
n ❑❑❑O
m D D C)
r m
r
m A
„z m m �v C
N 0 A
?
'o y
m �
n
xar 4.vw OR.
v►�
❑❑❑❑
soa
m m
C n 70
A F 1,
LAm C-$Zo
1
tz 11"',If7"
' ' + DATB..... dJECT.................... . SN�Ci.NO
Y _.-.... • -•- n
t .•• .. y�
....*..... ..:.,L JO NQ7. .. ;.�.
R _t CHKD. SY.. DATE.... ..... .••........................
0 0; 7-49hb\/I r+-1 Co r D$
• r '}s': t +�.{', fir.
.k
'=:: ; ` ' :. �� PN .•►t_..Tt 6... er v �•► C� P,'a�.' 1 ry !:.. C QO NI' Q,,,� _'r a . is-S % `� � a `i`• '' 'tk'
of a`YM CIS.. w� ,
►TlNe
J It
�h rl fi _�... .£ ._,.,,, o I, a •r R�! + c Xti srYa�i" f.
yi t, rf 1s it H 4l 1 lVf
i %'�,
r'� 2 � .�. • y ,� � 7� ' ~ fir- 1 t t .A�f' `>�' �
'`'` � ;, � -; ' L..�G>►t�.►... p6es�2•IF'TI aN.i ''�' ',�„' . v � k;;`,k ��
e } t sY d r
•tAYt-OrZ..
t' ,�.; 2��, z.- ��' •� `fir
t 1 .�. is .� . I ' .,✓.
11
All
L-.t�•. 'j_y ;+4r 't4 t.R.1. .a.., �_' � 7. '';s ��t•'�"h
s. f' 11rr
-44
41
Al
-jr
i
M-340 This The board of iWjustmaut
F104: Richard 14
AsSiatant Cit7 Engineer
3UBJEM Rovember 22* 19710 Hearing on tho Convenient Stores (Olympic
View, Drive & Gra%dviaw)
The Zftineoring Department 'has received an application for
a Street Use Fermit. from the oubject property with a sketch requesting
the use of 18 feet of Right-of-way on olympte vtev 'rive for laa4stapinS.
After review of the applic.ationj, we find that it would be acceptable to
extend the lati4scaping into the right-of-vay a, dist=te of 9 feat (vers"
18 feet as requested by the owner). However# final approval of this
application will be up to the City Council at the next Council Meeting.
4IX4 1 Mj f
"ktit ach"ent
'r '+ •'+ . �,+. fit'. ^..n? .� `^.<!+:°akl"A+'.,,�h i)rl. f Y 7 .�,� '..•f}y"'', y,�'k` I ,� f*'
no
IAA
1 - ., .�, ,� r •h s _ - ', aREET•.i'1Y'�,
j',•-may Y f � ,, » .. {�':r. :{ y __-:, ,, �{'•�
71.
14
v� ° t .•. ?' � 1r, ,;' a�+•. Syr
1.
y ' `. r �` r.-/ �• � } .w .-vr �a. s,_ws.�.+rwr. � ,n..y.�. � - - \., � � •. � h 1 ' �
le
f f � .we„n+1. � � �!' r....wya�w�r...es•s«•.1►1� "`"�,�"• a r
i . • � ''2 •mY►, � � �.. ' r o� "�.. a1Y+wr.'. "'�" `f� '�✓ ., � • � n W _ _ , . � �..-' iil� `4 J ''�
WID
.h
�� �' CJ � •d r t' 'i N Y •
» d , �•......:rI..-..«w..�.•- w.y' ...-mow - .�.. +iyis-":,-7 "•'.r*' 'f �- .,i
pt
.000
i •
'! t
rt
-rr
iti d �n • r
�'�. s. ., Y .,. die ' �,� t4_ a. •' � r `V," �(•s•. �, •
� 'N: � ` > •rdY � ' '' '•ti ', ` ,�'ep' •.rF • . ' �11 ,. 11 1y i J i �.. > '' �^ , '" !�`,�
v y . . - v
Ilk.
�.. � ,,�``r ��`�a , d. j t "�4 h =. s �� �A t ''✓! L . , r s y �} y9 �+. .'i ,y. *., d.
� ;a +� �I�'fI � i � 1Ki", % v+y' � `�� � "� r . ;, r � • .. , * 4f t- 1.
�`� .�✓ . . �'"� .� ', � � �� ! � ..r 'fM ;,•Sti r�ir:�; wr►Y�tlrf,�l�,+i��*M��1�.+h1�',� i . r.� � , .�, •
CTV
0
--I
A
------------
a
m
m a
Z
�a
JD!0
W
mo
0
i Z
m
'01 .01 01
I
I
•
I
b
4
1'
I H
I a
r
m
1 u
0
STREET FILE
............ ..... ..... r..:. ���y ATOj. OF '
JCB N0
.....................................
i .ti ...... ^ R. .. � �. �. s
r.' .•1•..w. • ...........- „•........... :.. ............ ............. ................. ..• .. «7•.r a •J
r`t M �� ' sa I,z
A\/ •' •�sair,2 O�%rIV
: e�ay...a,� ►�/J►� r r�i �. C �2.oNt j��, , C � s �'�.
•)f � ,, . �i: �� ,/ ��N'�* �,r . !'a�„ "'` 'E `a 7 ''' � Y � :��it� to }�rii, { It �a
t't.. i � "yy..a�r.�A�.i,#.%, . �'. 'i _ �y ,St, r1,r'. Iw'•'� , �� a 'fY k� •'�1y. �, (+,.,�' J�"�5._,'9�,v' tr,'
~'Y�➢ '9 .. 7 S - s� :,,, ar 7' j`• .�'i.' ''",yA "
Y iD � � yik a •�yr' i ri { ti y
Ivy
TT
i4 t 1' vM1, t a' i,,a: •Jr, , J3
,ate
r: "� � i. • ')1 r� " " wr 3 .. ..�.. ....._ ... _. ... - ;er .... .:..t.�_,.... _.:9 "Y`cr- t �• 7 � � �% a 3 ,..la ,�T�.� �.
4.
7 ;A. t,:rFt
jj �� Y sai�' - P.1 • �..�.�wr.a � � �� �-- 1 �IM.ai rir � } .. •, i . :
,i tr � �' �.%�' h�• ' i1''� 1 i1•� N. e gt '� ' '+ ,B y , 't •M1r .•�
t i i , lt�i+� s�` t� 1 9.� - t,.F tY�r•„ i+" `� `' � M �'�Yr y
�° '" � �� t; a.,�,� � ��.. �it11C► L.� (7��++CL..) Q "i"1. (, • ist '�' t y - t`tP� �ys��
T I+ /� �/ y -�1 •� � i.. � .� p1► ,' "" rTy S,7F4,
{••III}1�. it
1.4Y/��M
A f
a�i
�'e F� i7 ''.�' i'? tb d "`+`xF' #r
,�� � 'SMf'4`• �, ^. _r r. t ;i , r�.` Ia,..Iirrs z"I fF s `rya f (�.
� i ` }'!, .' .. ;�7Y •'ryl it 2 # to tat''f
q if't
At
.: f I. '�% Ttt' d r F'' sv ., '✓t;,. are ti,� a •M1 + n, '.
�`"'�� �., ,?•�,' rr . �G D• w vr3:t ry j �r r.i -r � -r�:ia Fi .. - , 4 . M �' ��, � ,� _��N' � ,•,�„•;
` - - �. a ,. r,_'- $Yf '?te.: p .-� t riT �'R"
A,
a
''. 3n ."�'? 'aa ��.`. .�:t{�r' ,� ' .y 'i.' , "'. °F's„ ..G•r„ 'I" ���z•t +° .:'+" t�.ii tey, �y,�'�
n -
rY"
k'�J t x • a.' "; ,. r `t J«dtF_ • a ' 7' �� 35 ))�, f ,'•'
as cM K ,� �� M 9, u 1 '7 r ii .e.i .} 1 � f I ," ;� ) � ~ 7 ! '�F� i'�• ' ]� lci. �i � �'l � �,
It
"M ' y mi" tt `,y _ s, - , • _ + 'i ' =ca �'°' e +�t x,,� s �{ i',; i. i �'
i�waY �^, A ' , ' S,' ,' r4. g. 'al. � '"i+A.�;... dry �'•i;. r . c � J' ,u' t. t� �'rk .
Y ' ,t, �, { _, it •' ' t i -,.
',Ryy, #•��>! 771 � . , �+, ' . ' 1 . - " I a t' ' ' ati . ��"! `r• , ,y t s+{!--; �ra� ��_ .
t i R, �• y , r . r ,aa ., ,�
C
r . ia.
• ENGINEERING DEPARTi7EtdT • STREET [� ; w
PLAT AND SUBDIVISION FIELD CHECK LIST r.t,'„
1
Applicant COOVOV I -9r 1fa Field Check By Date 6"74- 7/
STREETS AND ACCESS
1. Right -of -Way: I i
G I-A-N Q Vi CV✓ -?a f l I' .36 !'� v �I� r� S Ebx-- (111P /0.4— -2) 4A) 6 S_
2. Street Type & Condition:
Z cm, (-oorr
3. Access /Ea ements:
UTILITIES
t.r
1. Water Mains:'ijS1
2. Sanitary Sewer Location:
by Ji-' JAJ Gf'aWD VVeV C� t). of ?I-*j
4. Assessy�ent-
/VOW,-
5. Storm Sewer: U
6. Utility.Easements:
". Septict�D ainffeld Area:
fv
TOPOGRAPHY
-��-tea---
fGAT
LOT ARRANGEMENT
QV
GENERAL COMMENTS
-_3.•__-Depth-:- 606 ll✓t- Ca �i��� �A. a9,
JAM, OK
STREET FILE
ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL
AND APARTMENT BUILDING PROJECTS
Name Convenient Stores (Olympic View Drive & Grandview)
Date June 25, 1971
STREETS AND ACCESS
1. Right -of -Way Requirements: No Right-of-way required
2. Road Bed Width: No improvements required except at driveway entrances
3. Turn Around: N/A
4. Sidewalks: None required
5. Parking Strip: N/A
6. Access Easements: None required
1.. Water Mains: None required
2. Fire Hydrants: None required
1.
UTILITIES
3. Sewers or Septic Tanks: Connection to sewers required
4. Drainage: Install all necessary storm sewers and drainage facilities
per drainage plan and City Standards. Where drainage is across adjacent
private property, all parties having, any ownership interest in the lands
being developed shall provide, as a restriction on the title running with
the land, that the city of Edmonds shall be held harmless .from any and all
claims for damages which may be occasioned to adjacent land by reason of the
construction and operation of the drainage system, unless, releases of
damages and/or drainage easements are obtained from the other property owners
affected by said drainage. Any drainage problems created by change of: contour
during development must be corrected prior to occupancy permits or release
of performance bond." Final approval (or release of bond) will be withheld
until actual, drainage as installed has been inspected by -the City Engineer.
Engineering Requirements for Comm'1 &
Apartment Building Projects - Page 1� - Convenient Stores (Olympic View Dr. & Grandview)
5. Utility Easements: None required
6. Underground Utilities: To be provided in accordance with Ordinance No. 1387.
Street lighting, shall also be provided with the necessary street light
standards and underground wiring. Street lighting not required. Underground
connection required.
TOPOGRAPHY
1. Excavation and Grading: Excavation and grading shall conform to the requirements
outlined in Chapter 70 of the.Uniform Building Code, latest adopted edition,
Vol. 1. Where extensive grading and fill are involved in the development, a
grading plan and specifications shall be prepared.
QUOTATION FROM THE CITY COUE.REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS
ll.02.025(f) Utilities and Street Im rovements. No building permit shall be
issued for the construction of any building or structure of any kind or
description unless the plans and specifications include the construction for
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, necessary water lines, sewer lines, and
storm drainage necessitated by the new construction or improvement, to be built
to applicable City standards, provided, however, if found by the City Engineer
to be impractical to construct at the time of application for said building permit,
construction may be waived by the City Engineer and in lieu thereof a performance
bond filed with said engineer to cover the estimated cost of construction to City
standards for said improvements, provided further, in areas zoned single family
residential at the time of said application for building., permit in which the
applicant has received final approval for a plat or sub -division and has compiled
with requirements therein compliance with this subsection shall be deemed by
compliance with the sub -division or plat requirements.
COMMENTS
Rev. April 2, 1971
I � - L�,�
Ci Engineer
MEMO TO: Conevnient Stores File
FROM: Richard H. Allen
Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT:
STREET FILE
0�
November 23, 1971
The Convenient Stores has not met the requirements as outlined
to them when they applied for a building permit. The drainage was not
installed according to their plan and the driveway openings do not meet
City Standards.
RHA:mjf
ALTERNATIVES
ai
5
OLYMPIC -VIEW DR.
30. SCALLE'
FRONT PAE)ONC LOT AREA S
135 • 7446
;Z x s
3 0 = Soo
4-0
7990
SJOG PARKING LOT AQUA 20 k s'3
• 4- A ZZ
gr
IJ49
a% = rz
7 2 Z
10 001 PLAMTIMG- "W1001)
FA66JT PLAIJT,N& AREA 5 x wo
#00
72.
'S x 33
165-
637
SIDE PLAMTIU,;- A&CA 4 x 24.
733
OP PILAwrikia
eavooso
167ERHATIVE / �••' pEC 140 *?1
0 L YM PIC
VIEW
DR.
50
FR-ouT PAevoija AaeA
% ss x Iss
• 74+0
x 30
s' 30 0
1174o
6 %'o
_ Gro
SIDE PAArwKlG AP_EA
& 3 r Z4 IS to
—(4 x 9) = 1474 8 %
1 14
738 of Pi.AFJT►u&-.
FRopf: PLAojri )& A26A
S x TO
a
¢oo
(p • K IL
7Z
3 x ,L
s
ZIO
L8s
6
SIDO PCAWTIQ& AAG^ :
4 x to
40
4 rc
,3
76
7G
7.59
e7e
September 29, 1975
Rex Strickland Company
1300 Olympic View"Drive
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Subject: Convenient Store Property
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to your request relative to ingress and egress to
the Convenient Store 'parking area adjacent to O1 is View Drive,
we have made an on -site inspection and agree the planter box
separating the driveway access is a safaty hazard., Therefore,
the planter box may be removed or relocated to the south.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this
office.
LRL:rf
CONCURRENCE:
Harrison, yor
leery truly yours,
CITY OF EDMONDS
LEIF R. LARSON, P.E.
City Engineer
STREET FILE
September 29, 1975
MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Harve Harrison
FROM: Leif R. Larson
City Engineer
SUBJECT: 8 & H Market -- Center Planter
We have investigated the parking lot problem involving the center planter.
From a safety standpoint the planter should be removed. A letter has
been sent to Mr. Strickland recommending that it be removed. It is strictly
on private property.
rf
It did indicate that Edmonds hies very restrictive ordinance at the present
time. Mr. Whitcutt introduoed.Mr. Herbert Chaudiere, noise eoisultant, who
wia'in the audience. Mr. Chaudiere made several• general comments and answered
questions from council. There was a question with regard to. train noise and
train whistles. ,Mr. Chaudiere said that it may be possible for'iadividual
communities to restrict the whistling as long as other appropriate safety
n measures have been taken. Councilman -Anderson said that the major complaints
IN he has heard are with regard to unmuffled cars and motorcycles.
There'was•a brief reference to the.convenience store on Olympic View Drive,
and Mr. Yhitcutt mentioned that they have until. the 13th of MAY to muffle the
vnoise from their compressors and bring the level into compliance with our present
ordinance. 'Mr. Cheudiere'oommented .that. perhaps we could.organize a task group
to look'into developing, our owni'inodel noise'ordinaice to suit our own particular
MOTION: requirements. further die
.Following ouesion, itwaa MOVED.BY COUNCILMAN OELIERT
AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NELSON TO REFER THIS:MATTER TO THE PLAHMNa COMMISSION.
MOTION CARRIED.
.PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR VACATION OF PORTION OF 818T RN THROUGH SIERRA PARK SM
MOTION: COUNCILMAN'NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON TO. PASS RESOLUTION
SETTING ,4300 MAY 7; 197�►, 7:30.P.M: AS'.THE •TIME FUR HEARING THE PETITION TO
VACATE A PORTION OF 81ST WW THRO60H,SIERRA PARK. MOTION CARRIED.
ll // AUTHORITY MR SNOHOMISH COUNTY,,TO PLAN FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
FOR CITY OF EDAONDS.
MOTION• /��UNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN OELLERT TO PASS RESOLUTION
/ #301 AUTiiORIZINO SNOHOMISH COUNTY to PREPARE A PLAN`FUR THE CITY'S.SOLID
1/ WASTE MANAGEMENT MR INCLUSION IN THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PLAN. NOTION CARRIED.
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES.
CICuncil acknowledged receipt of.Claims for Damages from Steven W. bring and
O
""chard and Ruth Whiteside. They were referred to the City Clerk for processing.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before council, the meeting was adjoi.irned at
9:10 P.M.
rr�rrrrrrrrrrr
T „7
r
1
{'" )MONDS C CIL MEETING MINUTES
ST.tET'
FILE J6UARY 22, 1974
Counoilman Nordquist'inquired if City Engineer, Leif Larson, had contacted
{, Commissioner Forsgren regarding the widths of the roadway on the 220th Project.
Mr. Larson said that he'had done so.
Councilman Nordquist then asked for clarification of the date for receiving
proposals on the Mayor's office furniture. Jack Cooper,.Purchasing Agent,
1.; answered that these would be accepted up to January 29th and reported on at
the Council Work Meeting that night.
Councilman'Nordquist stated; that lie thought the minutes of the City Council
Meetings and the lane g
p in Commission Meetings should be'taped in their entirety,
and that these tapes be kept on file for a period of two years. He then made a
motion that from this point'on both the Planrl.i.ng Commission and C.i.ty Council
Meetings be committed tortapes. Councilwoman Shippen seconded. Councilman
Gellert asked.if the various;other.Boards and Commissions should also be taped.
This was not thought to be an urgent consideration at this time. Councilman
Welling.suggested that the contents of the tapes be indexed, so that it would
+ not'be necessary to, scan.the,complete tape in order to locate a particular item.
There was council,concurrerice•on this point. The question was asked if the
tapes could be admissible'as evidence.in a court of law. Attorney Wallace said that
they could be.'.if.they were properly certii'ied. The motion was then voted upon
and•,passed unanimously.
Councilwoman Shippen said'.that.she,thought the $10,000 to update the Municipal
"•';` Code'should be reinstated into the City Attorney's budget for this purpose.
She feels that in light of recent happenings it is more critical than it was
at the time. of the budget discussions.' She then made a motion to this effect.
Councilman Nelson pointed out.that the 1974 Budget had been passed unanimously
and 'that he thought this should be taken up at a later time for discl.lssion.
Mrs; .Shippen then said she would withdraw her motion and re -state it setting
a hearing date. .Councilwoman Shippen then moved that consideration of re-
instating $10 000 into the City Attorne 's bud et for updating the MunicipalCoNe
e d scussed at -the ebruaF 5th council meeting, along with determination
.:.
of w 'here the funds will come from. Councilman Gellert seconded. Methods for
' accomplishing this task werediscussed at length. Councilman Nelson moved to.
amend .the`main motion to allow the city staff to provide to the council those
areas that would be su ject.to revision and thereby allow the council to judge
exactlyhow much.--moneywould be needed if anadditional to revise our ode
rather than having a blanket 510,OOU which has been asked for. Councilman
e ing seconded the amendment. The amendment was voted upon and carried with
'. Councilwoman Shippen voting against. The main motion as amended then carried
I. unanimously.
Mayor,Harrison stated that another member for the Board of Appeals is needed.
Jack McLellan's teen har-, expired and he is no longer a resident of. the City of
Edmonds. "He asked _for .council confirmation for Wade James to be seated -on this
,Board.
A moti-on,was made by Councilman Nelson and seconded by Councilman Winters
: to confirm the appoiritment.of Wade James to the Board of Appeals.+ Discussion
followed regarding Mr. James' building on Main Street and alleged parking
violations; etc.', Councilman Nelson stated that based upon some of the facts
nought out in tiioldiscussion:he.would like to st ore action"on his motion
to a time certain, namely January 29th. lie then stated this in a tedorm o a
' motion which was ��g n seconded y ,ouncilman Winters. Motion was voted upon
,•, and' carried.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION.
} Jim Mueller reported on noise level raadings he- taken on:the property line
The readings were
eeparating'the Convenience .More and"the Cunningham home.
in excess'of the acceptablef;sound'pollution level. -Deputy City'Attorney, John
Wallace stated that lie had written.`'a letter to all parties concerned earlier
today wherein. he.says that this issue has been litigated, and the installation
as. it was
in and approved,' complies with the code. He said that only if .'
+'+ there is a new violation can proceedings be had on this matter and this would �,.
,e.
e*S 0�
EDMONDS JUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 22, 1974
-3-
/tail some charge in that installation, maybe some new equipment, perhaps
removal of some of the sound reducing devicf3 that had previously been put
on there, etc. Ward Phillips thought a charge in circumstances has taken
place and thought remedial action should be taken. Following more discussion,
a motion was made by Councilman Nelson to instruct the Building Department to
investi ate the premises and determine if there has been any change to
substantiate the readings By Prof. Mueller «nd bring those particular inves-
' ations t0 the attention of the City Attorney s0 hat the counci can make
fan ade uate determination an this repor should ready y nextweek.
fan
Wordquist seconded the motion.
Jane Cunningham, who was in the audience, stated that she would ask that no
one go on her property without permission from her or Mr. Cunningham and that
the noise level readings be taken along the store property line. Harry Whitcutt,
Building Official, stated that this would pose a problem since the fence is not
on the property line and the code says that you must take readings on the property
line, and therefore they must be taken from the west side. Mr. Whitcutt asked
Mrs. Cunningham if the City did not have permission to go onto her property?
She replied that she was too angry right now and the answer is no; and that
he will have to go on the store owner's property. Jim Mueller suggested that
if further measurements are to be made, that they be made in other areas other
than ground level at the property line. There was further discussion, and during
that time Mr. Cunningham said that if Mr. Whitcutt and an expert in testing for
noise pollution were to come to his door and ask for permission to take readings
on his property he would grant thatpermission. Co` �nci wo' oman Shippen t en
ameiideg the motion to authorize the Building Ins'pector to retain an acoustical
engineer and that the report come from a qualified testing laboratory. Counci an
Nordquist seconded the amendment, w ic. was voted upon and carried. he main
motion as amended also carried.
Mr. William Gear presented'the City Clerk with petitions signed by owners of
property suffering from storm water problems in vicinity of Walnut, west of 7th
and east of 6th. The City Engineer is to report on this matter on the 29th
of� •
Mr. Ed Robinson mentioned that at the last council meeting it was determined that
he City Attorney was to file an injunction on the Harbor Building and he asked
V if he could have a report on the matter as of today. Attorney Wallace stated
that he has requested that there be an executive session so that lie may report
the reculta of his research and his analysis of the problemv that arise ender
such a lawsuit to the council prior to instituting the action. There was a
brief discussion on the measurements taken of the building height. Jim Mueller
suggested a possible moratorium of 30 to 60 days for the acceptance of applicationr3
for building permits until this matter 4.s resolved. Attorney Wallace said there
is precedent for such action.
Pat Crawford, 15824 - 75th Place West, said that Laebugten Wharf is virtually
in his front yard and that he is concerned with wliat will happen with regard
to this project and war; pleased that the council is considering moving swiftly
to establish the Ameuitier, Design Board criteria. Ile also favored a moratorium
for issuance of building permits. There was some discussion regarding Laebugten
Wharf. It was pointed out that they have their Shorelines Permit, but have not
yet applied for their building permit. Councilman Welling made a motion seconded
by Councilwoman Shippen that the City of Edmonds adopt a resolution declaring a
moratorium on accepting for filing any building permits in the City of Edmonds
except those applied for in single-family residential areas for a period starting
instantly and terminating March 1, 1974, or upon the effective date of the proposed
Amenities Design Board Ordinance Amendment, whichever first occurs. Harry Sherman
asked if this meant remodeling also, and that he was concerned with the work
being done at the Senior Center. Ward Phillips upoke in favor of a moratorium.
Warren Murphy, 22919 - 100th West asked what happens to the builder that has
made application and is almost ready to proceed. Attorney Wallace said that
his rights relate back to the date of application, and that the items of the codes,
of Edmonds that must be met are fixed as oi' tiiat dote under State Law.
.....,A.LTERNATIVE
STREETr
14o
�.
DRIVEWAY.
R
-
N..
N
-
G,
No
M
5
3o'
O LY M P I C-'
VIEW DR.
.
3o sc/�LE
.FRONT PA1zkIMG LOT AREA : SS'><
136 = . 7440 >A
K 5
30
S x 30
so
SIOE PARKING LOT Al2.6A 20 x 's 3
= 1 060
AT
1149
722 off' Pu►�rrING RCgWRrD
FA6IvT {' PLAUTIN& AWA s, S x to
400
G K 12.
72 .. •`
S r 33
IbS
637
S166 'PLA NT.I WG A&VA t 4 x 24
= 96
733 - .op Pl.ANTIAIG ezamDEO
_
i
STREET FILE
EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Regular Meeting
November 22, 1971
The November meeting of the Edmonds Board of Adjustment was called to order by the
Chairman, Calvin Thompson at 8:00 P.M. at the Civic Center Council Chambers. About
30 people were in the audience.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT ABSENT
Malden Jacobson John McGibbon
Calvin Thompson Sam Felton
Bennett Box
Ann Rutter Staff
George C. Grant
Merlin Logan, City Planner
Harry WhitcutfOuilding Official
Petie Hendrick, Secretary
Roll call indicated there was a quorum. There no corrections or additions to the
minutes and they were approved as posted and mailed to theNBoard Members. Mr. Logan
instructed recipients of variance and conditional use permits. He informed the Board
that a reason must be given for approval or disapproval of variance actions. Mr.
Thompson informed the audience of the hearing procedure.
V-20-71 Wade H. James, architect for the Convenient Store at 1300 Olympic View
Drive, Variance to locate the required parking lot landscaping on the street
right-of-way. ON Zone)
Bennett Box asked to disqualify himself because of a possible eonflic* pf interest.
Mr. Logan showed the site plans of Convenient Stores, beginning with the original
plan to the revised plan that was given to him at this meeting by Mr. James. Mr.
Logan explained to the Board and the audience that the only thing the Board would be
acting on would be the location of the planting areas. Mr. Logan said that originally
the owner of the property and the City thought the property line was 12 feet west of
it's actual location. In 1951, when the property was still in the County, 12 feet.
of right-of-way was vacated and given to the owner of the property. It is 38 feet
from the pavement on Olympic View Drive to the edge of the applicants property,
and they were requesting to move their planting area eastward 18 feet. Mr. Logan
said the Engineering Department did not like the original idea of having the plant-
ing areas 20 feet from the edge of the pavement and requested Mr. James to move the
planting areas to 29 feet from the pavement. The new drawing Mr. James presented
showed the planting areas 29 feet from the right-of-way./ City Codes regulate the
openings so the concern of the Board is the planting areas. Mr. Logan said there
were other aspects to this development which must be worked out, such as drainage,
but these do not concern the Board. Mr. Logan said he had several questions con-
cerning the planting areas. What would happen if the Board allowed the planting in
the public right-of-way and later the right-of-way was to be used by the City. The
planting beds would have to be removed and by what authority would the City require
the developer to re -install the planters on his own property? A performance bond is
frequently required to quarantee some types of improvements, but such bonds could
not logically be used for an indefinite period of time such as this might be. Mr.
Logan said there are no definite plans for widening the street or whether the plant-
ing beds would have to be removed. He said he had been informed by the neighbors
that the school buses use this area for picking up children. With the widening of
the street and with the planting beds back on the owners property there would still
be plenty of area for the buses to stop. Mr. Logan said the site plan originally
had provided for the required number of parking spaces with a minimum of manuever-
ing area, but with the additional 12 feet of property the area for parking and
manuevering was now generous. Mr. Logan recommended denial of the application.
Mr. Wade James, architect for Convenient Stores was in the audience and stated that
the request to place the planting bes in the public right-of-way was to lessen the
unimproved space in front of the store. Mr. James said there would be approximately
zi
/Nl�'VI
OFED14CNDS A. C.:TION TO BOARD OF .ADTUS'' iT M File-."icONDOS, WASHINGTON FOR VARIANCE n. , 'Date G -
FROM REQUIREE?jENTS OF ZONING C,ROIN, ANCE .- Tee. _ G2b.00
Rect. No.:.!0 79__..._
(Please refer to Official Zoning Ordinance, City of Hearing Date
Edmonds, with special reference to Chapter 12.16,
Administration. Note Standards and Criteria on Page 2
of this application. Copies'of Ordinance available at STREETPlanning Department or Public Library.) FILE
APPLICANT: G rl . JAMIC-S ADDRESS: 15- MAMI PHONES 12U 114,
Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: 17L2
OWNER:efGhJ-rm, n p MESS: 1.�d�1338� ga&w 011M 2-161
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADD 8):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY t_mQ-'1
r. - - -' - i . r.�. wr�.•�ri�w.�rrrrrin..rrr.�.�
.r..rr�r� iirwr�rwr��rw w rrrr��i
_..LEGAL PESCRIPTIO!!i...CfiEC=. & AWVED ....... _.
E YANE�-~ By Planning Dept.
ZONING ORDINANCE UI NT:_"Op2gag 1 kl(o L N P&QU Ora 1.-0- 'T
.ter, r ■� ri.r.rrr .wrr�
- .rr��irr ir.rr�.e•-r ..r
VARI ;NC.: REQUESTED:
STATDMT CF CONDITIONS AND R„ASONS FOR Ri QUOST, I11 ACCORDANCE WITH STMID.0.R, A0,77
SK7TCR: Show below or attach a Vicinity Sketch of -the area per example on reverse side.
Sho;� also a plot 'plan, of the subject property, i�cdicat' : �, e21 buildings (existing and
proposed), setbacks (existing and proposed), and adja.:cnt streets. Plot plan eb+U be
drawn to an indicated scale. Indicate north on both sketches. If sketches ase attachod,
lease suubbril nine ao es.
1,
-2-
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
DMONDS COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
ANUARY 15, 1974
Wi.11iam Gear, 633 Walnut, advised council that he had a petition signed by 43
homeowners in the area bordered by Walnut Street west of 7th and east of 6th,
who were suffering from water problems caused by the city's storm water system,
and they were asking for action by the city for relief from this water accumulation.
Mayor Harrison referred the question to City Engineer Leif Larson, who explained
.that this was a problem due to lines plugging up with debris over the years and
new storm sewer to remedy this would be necessary. Most of the problem is in these
low areas. Mr. Gear requested some action be taken on the petition. He noted that
as an engineer, he was at a loss to suggest any solution, but as a homeowner, he
was frustrated with the problem. Engineer Larson advised council that he would
make an evaluation of the storm sewer there and report back to council. Helen
Lambe, 624 Alder, also stated that she had a veritable lake in her yard -.and water
overflow. A motion was made by Councilman Nordquist, seconded by Councilwoman
Shippen to accept the petition and instruct the City Engineer to report back to
council on this problem by January 29. Motion carried.
Mrs. Cunningham, Grandview Street, again brought to council attention the noise
problem at her home. This noise originates from the compressor system at the
neighborhood convenience store. Jim Mueller stated that he had taken a noise meter,
and found that the decibel level was 42, and the Code al lows: a 40 level. Mrs.
Cunningham told council that she had spent $1050 to date on court proceedings, etc.
but the court did not rule on the noise violations. She asked if council could
have the city executive officers do something about this noise factor. Jim
Mueller exlained the decibel scale and advised that a reading of 42 is 52% over the
40 level reading. He then showed council the noise meter he used, and demonstrated
it, noting that the City Engineer could perform this duty rather than the city
having to -hire someone. If the City Engineer cannot, Mr. Mueller said he would be
glad to offer his services. He .went on to state that the Code all;ows 40 decibels
between 11:30 P.M. and 6:00 A.M.:,--and allows up to 60 decibels at other times.
Councilman Winters suggested the compressor equipment at the store could be re-
located, and Mrs. Cunningham said she felt all this should have been wholly con-
tained in the building. -In regard to the A, B, and C scale on the noise meter,
Joe Wallis asked Jim Mueller to'comment on this as it would apply to our code.
The answer was that the city would have to specify A, B, or C level for the
decibel reading, and this would need further study. Councilman Welling said there
was need to go over this area of the code and specify the levels of decibels and the
scale to be used. There=was a great deal,of discussion on the problem of noise
levels, the code, and who would enforce it, and how to get relief for the
Cunninghams. City Attorney Wallace advised council that in December of 1972, the
Board of Adjustment found that the -owners of the store were in compliance with the
code. There followed discussion on the location from which the noise level was
taken, behind the fence on the Cunningham property. City Attorney Wallace then
advised council that there was no way for this matter to be brought before council
for a hearing, and that state law sets the process. Mr. Cunningham.spoke on the
csituation up to this point and stated they were not going"to stop, but would con-
tinue to pursue the problem. Building'Official Whitcutt said he would ask for
the hiring of an expert to take the noise level. Jim Mueller said this was not
necessary, and could be done by the Engineer, or he himself would offer to do it.
Council members were in agreement that something should be done to resolve this
problem. Harry Whitcutt requested council consider study of the existing ordinances
and review and restudy that area of the Code. Ward Phillips stated that if a
property owner believes there is violation of an ordinance, the City should find
out and then enforce the ordinance to protect the citizen. It was thought that
the store in question could now be in violation and the City Building Department
would investigate following registration of a complaint with that department.
Mayor Harrison said the city would accept the offer of Jim Mueller to make the
noise level readings and submit these with the Cunningham's complaint to the
Building Department.