The URL can be used to link to this page

16340 75TH PL W.PDF111111111111 6077 16340 75TH PL W ADDRESS: . J�V� / Lam. hW TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: X 3-13 / OC 0®L 000 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): / -! L /—Cyo /.S' COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: f 1fr/�/G► /' !,Ikm 1r ff # 7. !6 -/ 11 W9,41rM`es,J #q-?0q16Q31.�`" CRITICAL AREAS 0 L 3(0 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required Awaiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: q-2-6 --q 0) 6—D--q / t 5':./4-49 0 PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: - EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: Our CfA/� l �(/b� � L L, PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: /2-2,5 03 SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: G ` D SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: .5--14'9v STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DATED- C- 1/✓AL /-jOU-ff .�/ 16¢olo /3w6 /fit vino✓,r ii 1iGi- Ca-w,,O 1 k 1+'tM /%/fir Lo.� L:\TEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc l o o a o _ CU c 'M '1d ESL v oW w 1 W CC _ CDCD m ,Z8 CD uj CD CT I (4 o CD LLJ CT N In _ a6,o.wg a OJ 0 — . — d asnoH d > cl U ram` Aa 3 oD ---- of d woo.�uns �"> '�'� .. x N MaN: . Q Q Q �? (() J J CU ate:- ;I I v, o�.. C:3 C ' ui _-Cl rT o" y� a_ t 1O, m" 0 u . - 3 CU 0. 00 a, Os do Qjs3N. LO v 1 r1 ^M CT,D E -0 d U Z. -i W 0 }-dl.9r.._ � •,,,-ur,ow+ �• �... �r .Div,,pFClypyMywi+•�'divi�"`;'rTM"'��'.�v. v .. ..' �� _ i. i;�, �xt-.'1 h.3'.Y<"th��l".w"""v`��'wy�'w�AtoA-'Mk�o«.-aria"°`'"�+¢. . STPOET FILE RECEIVED10 11. ` CITY OF EDMONDS SEA 10 19�QI SIDE SEWER PERMIT '8 9 0 -, 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PERMIT, 8332 Address of Construction. I olqo e�; Property Legal Description (Include all easements): LYNNWOOD LINE -'�-z /1p G(ro -C)/d -Gc)G3 Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. Gd� Ems` �' //71Y :2 Building Permit No. esingle Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way: 8 No ❑ Yes ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial Cross other Private Property: ®-40 ❑ Yes ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify hat I have read and sAiifl gmply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. * Permit Fee: C) Trunk Charge: >!:5�`S Assessment Fee: Lid No.: Issued By�c Date Issued: /� 2 7 Receipt No.: y� Partial Inspection: Date Initial Comments Reason Rejected: ✓.� Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Datel(Q-1t:8Llnitial FLl ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Butt Copy: Applicant Revised 3/90 • A, z z Z _4 O z 0 z �4 u 0 pq .4 x cn P-1 w 04 100, P w z 0 0 z z I -;ICE.- No viv- AcOod map vjai,, an,- consUanis. 1-(,. r sc,, fcqtj cond,!,'f et Sv:.-,c It. 10G&iiui- S" the of ('�Py cn s"Ub cr i., 1 not cujst ffi nor for alyag O z O z . � z O v z o z W°z � A w a El O z Q o � z 0 vs c •Ri ® � 914 � O z U w L p d A � u z O � w z O 3 z 3 (I W O W V w A , WA H O O 0 J �j `t _ � ..�.� nG! �. •.I�•. 19 IN !� ' r w Q LO a CITY.OF EDMONDS FOR INSPECTION • CALL ` PUBLIC WORKS :DEPAR ITT Permit ltj.&ey SLDE SEWER. PERMIT 777j5j-2`�525� -Ext. 2y21'0 Issue Date iPl 7) * PERMIT MUST BE -POSTED ON JOB SITE * f ..1. Address of Construction p` I LI 4 q '7 c f 2. Property Legal Description (include all, easements) 110 3. LU 4. 5. 6. Single Family Residence X Multi -Family Commercial Owner and/or Builder Contractor & License No. LYNNWOOD Llt�E 1 No. of Units Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No k Yes way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig excavation). (If Yes Right-of- (3,412j,'S' ,4,4/) before 1-800-454-5555 7. Cross other private property: Yes No Easement required - v attach legal description and county easement number. H a READ THE FOLLOWING AND SIGN:' a 4 a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on �H their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. w b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each H installation for one year. wC. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6") z side sewer line. o d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade. of 2% (1.150) o and maximum grade of 100% (45°). 0 H f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45 (1/8,bend) is0allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original. conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for.right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. .1. Insp.ection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notice/ required. DATE: I certify that I have read and shall comply with the above PERMIT FEE: DISAPPROVED BY: Date: OC) Date: CONNECTION FEE: APPROVED By•B Date: / 8 *.PERMIT MUST BE POSTED Ori JOB SITE NNW i M 1 t : ,ri }ou ,;^op spJOWP s R D] h 43 941414 e,wn 104 a� l w e_ yr ON w O -P r �j A -M - -id vj-L 5L 0 d H 0 z i ❑' Lrn s • PLANNING DAT,�TREET FILE NAME: tea, ,- SITE ADDRESS: PROJECT DESC REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: Ye No MAP PAGE: nQQ CORNER LOT: Yes o TE: 'LAN FLAG LOT: Yes No ZONING: r—S- -- d CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #:OA- aov5 -1:3� ❑ Study Required: Waiver / ❑ Conditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee , ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form ' C., v.�<�. 4 tea-- C' f f- . c�� cam,,, SC ❑ (Needed fof 500 cubic yards oYgrading, Shoreline Area- site whin 200 .. 9f Puget ound or ak a roger i'Y�` l c-�s�e,. t-.�w.d s �o�� / C xempt l ovf- SETBACKS: /I o Required Setbacks: ` Street: Left Side: Right Side: Rear:' Actual Setbacks: Street: 101 , Left Sider- y . 2 SRight Side: 1 1 , s Rear: 1 c � Street map checked for additional setback required? Yes / No / ❑ DETACHED STRUCTURES: ❑ ROCKERIES: ❑ FENCES/TRELLISES: ❑ BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: ❑ STAIRS / DECKS: PARKING: Required: Actual: }JO (2j'A cl_ --eal-2. LOT AREA: I 1 -7 v LOT COVEFUME—.- Calculations: ,2 L-I L\4. 21 'I A BUILDING HEIGHT: ok-� -S'-O� Datum Point: �^ Datum Elevation: Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: A.D.U. CREATED? No Yes) SUBDIVISION: LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: Yes / No) OTHER: c t't2 e_� / l "� i 1-,� Z�A C"" 1 Plan Review By: Q N eBPPI ' D t F DO w arming a a orm. � o -r � �a o�:1-•i : ,,�--�-c� awe w�� i��- 1�-1- ; � plc}- SP S.8.87 y 3 62 0 j � 8 !' +'Yl Lril YA �+H+H+H+H+H+H+H+H+H- 9 rL' 63 0( „ ' r i r 1 -02 r r O l _r: , 2 1 1 rr 0 07 89++ 10 03, --I-r) C-t G `C-D A-o R. hcv . ' o-. vm0 T5-)r MetroScan Full Legal APN:00 5131 0600 00 MEADOWDALE BEACH BLK 060 D-00 — TR 10 PLUS VAC SEASIDE AVE LESS TH PTN ESTABLISHED AS BEING S LN OF LOT 9 DAF BEG FRACTION OF FT S OF NE COR OF SD LOT 10 TH W TAP 6 4/10FT S OF NW COR OF SD LOT 10 PERSC NO 26958 DATED 4-5-29 & EXC ELY 1OFT_THOF TO CITY OF EDMONDS PER QCD REC AF NO 9106140299 TWG TH PTN� OF VAC 1.64:TH�ST__SW, _W_ OF "TSTH;PL_'W_LY ADJ� &�=PABTGtaSD` LO.T�APER�CITY, OF ED.-ORD-##3207-;REC—AFN 9806030201 �aG�,i-1."��.' C� � t-1-� 1-� �'�� -►- �-P va`c c.�f-,� d 1 (d u �' ��- . SuJ -7-1- Critical Areas CheckllS[ CA File No: cO Site Information;(soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation) 1. Site Addres"s/Location:.,_ w 2. Property. Tax Account•Number: CJ `3` - Ot.o O 3. Approximate Siie Size!(acrest.or square feet): �. \ ,`i 3C, 4.. Is this site'currently.developed. es;' ho. If yes;ihow is site developed? 5. ' Describe th6'general site, topograpl y. Check all'that apply. Flat: • less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling:' slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal I distance of 66-feet). .Hilly, slopes present on,site of more. than;l5% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet j over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). jSteep: grade's of greater than 30%.'present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal E distance of less than 33-feet). ;' .Other (please describe): 6. Site contains •areas. of -year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: .� 7.' Site'coiltains'areas`of�seasonal'standing water: ; Approx. Depth: i What season(s)' of:the year? i 8. -Site is in -the floodway, floodplain -of a water course. 9. Site'contains acreek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? .(What time of year? — y, 10. Site is pigmanly: forested meadow ' ; shrubs ; mixed - urban landscaped:(lawn;,shrubs etc) _.. y tS 11. : Obvious'wetl'and is present on site:' �+ For City Stiff Use Only x 1. Planp!e;k�Number, g applicable? 2. Site4oned? R i a 3. SCS mapped soil types)?&Jak 5. t Areas inventory or C.A:'aiap indicates Critical Area on site.�,an� Site with in designated'earth DETERMINATION. �[ STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Review id! by- Date:—'4� V Critical Areas'Cbecklist.doc/4.22.2003 City of�drilonds. Development Services Department ' Planning Division Phone:, 425.771.0220, Fax:: 425.771.0221 Date Received Critical Areas File MI Critical Areas_ChecklistFee • � $135.00 ' Date Mailed to.A 'licant: !' .. .- .. ,. ... .. ... .. - _..:• ::X+:, e,•_ "LC Fr'"` VY `"'.. ..c,.._ TR.:'44'Or4�i.s.. .r,.: . The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form: is ao A property owner, or< his/her' authorized representative, be filled out by any person preparing a Development must fill out the, checklist,f; sign and date it, and submit it . Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to to the 'City. TheCity' will eview the ,'checklist, make a his/her submittal of the application to the City. precursory site visit, and mmake a determination of the s necessary stepry -complete a development to comple The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to . , subsequent. , -; .; . determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or ' Perniit application. may be, present on the subject property. The information Please submit a vicinity map; along with the signed copy needed to complete _-the Checklist should, -be 'easily of this 'form,to iassist•City staff in' -finding and locating the available from observations of the site or data available at specific -piece :of property .described on this form. In City Hall (Critical areas inventories,. maps,. or soil addition,, the applicant shall include other pertinent surveys). information (e.g. site plan, to o o h map,; etc.) or studies ;m conjunction with this Checklisfto assistant staff in completing their preliminary,:assessment'of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing ofhe application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of.Edmonds harmless from any. and. all damagesi. including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based 'in whole -or I part upon false; misleading,"inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or -employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith. submitted are .true. and convect to the :best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the .owner as listed below. t SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT '' 1 DATE U.u--O Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply: for the subject land use`application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter, the, subject property; for• the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER 7 _ I DATE- • 06 /,so k Owner/Applicant: Applicant Representative } • `,v Name Name .� . (Isc.* Street Address Street Address City State Zip City State Zip Telephone a ,,:� :)S \ Telephone: Email address (optional): Email Address (optional) s• Critical Areas Check] ist.doc/4.22.2003 Z N � W W � Z H W W Z W Z O w f- w Ir N • U) .,� W Oz Z 0 og ��Q Lu �oz 0 J W a p g O Z ?d N g 0 • V1 _W O rn W N 2 O H a a o�Q ':) Z W V U) c30W Z K U O w a u~i Z a> Z 6 z 0 w o z fQ c~n w ul U Z O_ a f W w tL z O '0 z a gZ x W W O U Z Q D w .� =) m J O D O L (a V) Y . M—NiTpumogiN CON&ILILTING ENGINEERS DRAINAGE INSPECTION and DRIVEWAY INVESTIGATION for the G OGERT RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 16407 75th Place West Meadowdale, Edmonds PROJECT NUMBER 1892 6 JULY 1992 4041 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PARKWAY SOUTHEAST • BELLEVUE • WASHINGTON • 98008 • 206 644 1080 r� • Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 1 of 7 pages CLIENT Tom Gogert 16606 52nd Avenue NW Stanwood, Washington 98292 REFERENCE Newhouse at 16406 75th PI. W, Meadowdale,.Edmonds City of Edmonds Permit Number 910615 SUBJECT 1. Inspection of drainage system 2. Investigation of driveway slope INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the results of a geotechnical inspection of drainage, and an investigation of the driveway design and construction, conducted on the new house located at 16406 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds. The geotechnical engineering and report were authorized by Tom Gogert of Gogert & Sons during a conversation with Dale C. Hemphill 'of HEMPHILL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (HEMPHILL). The geotechnical inspections were conducted in accordance -with the following recommendations and/or requirements: recommendations presented by Cascade Geotechnical in the report titled `'GOGERT MEADOWDALE LOT" (REPORT) and dated 8 January.1990. requirements, . established by the City of Edmonds Building Division. r,-J JJ rP =,-U L Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 2 of 7 pages The inspection of the drainage system was conducted because Cascade GeotechnicaI had . not observed the installation of the drainage system based on their recommendations in the "report". The investigation of the driveway design and construction was conducted based a letter from the FOOTING DRAINS City of Edmonds Building Division dated 10 June 1993. The letter stated that the driveway was not constructed as shown on the drawings, which showed the driveway to be a continuous 14%. The letter also stated that a portion of the driveway exceeded 20%, which is the maximum allowable based on a City. Code. INVESTIGATION On 19 June 1993 HEMPHILL investigated the site and observed the catch basin at the rear of the house where the footing drains intersect with other drains. There was a slight trickle from the assumed footing drain inlet. HEMPHILL recommended that an excavation be conducted adjacent to the retaining foundation wall under the entrance to the garage to reveal . the "free - draining" backfill material recommended by Cascade, and to conduct a drainage test. On 29 June 1993 HEMPHILL observed that an excavation had been conducted as recommended that revealed the backfill adjacent to the foundation wall, and revealed the drainage gravel at the base of the wall. The excavation was approximately 7 feet deep, and the sides of the excavation stood. nearly vertical. r�� MI, A] I L • • Project number. 1892 6 July, 1993 HEMPHILL observed that the backfill soils are clean fine to medium sand that are slightly damp, but wet at the base of the fill, which indicated that any groundwater was being drawn down to the level of. the drainage gravel. Below the backfill soils is a clean gravel that had been wrapped in filter fabric. The 'pipe was not visible in the hole, obviously was DRIVEWAY HEMPHILL reviewed Drawing Number S-1 of Plan # 3332 by Structural Design Associates and observed that the design driveway is much different than the constructed driveway. Observations, measurements, and calculations revealed the advantages of the constructed driveway as follows: CONSTRUCTED DRIVEWAY HEMPHILL conducted measurements and elevations of the driveway, and, observed that the driveway had been constructed with smooth transitions from the landing at 75th Place West, and at the page 3 of 7 pages connected to the pipe observed in the catch basin. Red dye was poured into the hole, and then a hose was. inserted into the hole and turned on full force. HEMPHILL observed that red water. entered- the catch basin at the rear of the house within 2.5 minutes with a rate equal to the flow from the hose. entrance to the garage. The edges of the driveway are slightly raised to divert stormwater toward the strip catch basin at the base of the driveway at the garage entrance. The driveway was measured approximately as shown in Figure 1 with the elevation at the entrance to the garage assumed to be 71.0. The lowest .elevation in the driveway is 70.5 at the slot drain. Each section - of the driveway was fairly constant in slope, therefore the measurements were conducted between sections. H�; �P�; rIrLL FIGURE 1 PLUM of DRIVEWAY MEAS REMENTS 75TIl p i . W w • Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 The measurements' shown were conducted along the slope of each section. Figure 1 shows the calculated slope percentages. The measurements and slopes show that a large car entering the garage would- have the rear end approximately 1.5 feet higher than the front end, which is acceptable, and a van could enter the garage without touching the top of the garage door. A large car can stop on the landing to 75th Place West with the rear wheels approximately 2 feet lower than the front, which is an acceptable landing for a single family driveway. The car exiting from the north garage can swing the front end to enter the turn around without the front wheels running off the pavement. The cars exiting from the garage can swing into the turn -around and exit the driveway with one turn.. page 4 of 7 pages Visiting cars -can turn into the turn -around to park, then can back out and exit with one swing (as I did with my 4 door Mercedes with an. Eldorado parked uphill from me). Figure 2, which shows the design driveway, is an portion of the drawing by SDA enlarged to a scale of 1 inch = 10 feet. Figure 2 is typical of most design drawings reviewed by HEMPHILL outside the structure and above the foundations because of poor accuracy of topography, and because of the difficulty for the designer to visualize three dimensions. Such drawings are seldom accurate enough that field adjustments are not required. If the driveway were constructed exactly as shown in Figure 2, the occupants would contend with the following problems: 1. The landing area drops off 1.1 feet at a 66% slope at the south end of the entrance. Enough that most cars would scrape bottom and hang up. E. LP SELL FIGURE 2 ORIGI& DESIGN PLAN of D EWAY 6 7- �. •�: w Y oo 4 A 41. to 76 EDGE �� AS A-��::- •<- G� �� 7 T H Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 5 of 7 pages 2. The entrance to the garage slopes down from 14.7% to 19.8% with no transition. The rear of a car entering the north garage will be 4 feet higher than the front on the right side, and 3 feet higher on the left side, as it enters the garage. A van could not enter either garage without scraping the top of the garage door. DRAINAGE 3:. A car in the north half of the garage could not back out and then turn its wheels to enter the turn -around without the front wheels running off the pavement. 4. A large 20 foot car backing into the turn -around would. not have room to turn up the driveway without running off the pavement. CONCLUSIONS , The test conducted verified that the drainage system works satisfactorily. HEMPHILL also observed that the backfill is a proper free draining soil, and is also within the specifications by Cascade, although the specifications are improper and do not guarantee a free draining soil. If the backfill soils had been at the lower end of the specifications, and a large percentage of the soils were between the 100 and 200 sieves, the soils would not only be non draining, they would also become liquid with saturation and the pressures against the retaining wall would increase. Although a 45 pcf efp was recommended for the design pressure against the wall, a proper free draining soil would'only exert 1/3 to 1 /2 as much pressure, as seen when the drainage test hole was able to stand nearly vertical (the actual lateral pressures are. nearly zero). Mark I E-21 rI -)H-TIrI,lei SNOIIVA313 .0 0 co r'- ........ . ...... . ......................................................... ... . ........ . ......................................................... ................. ......... ...... .......... ...... .. ..... .................. ............... ....................... .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ......... ......... . ........... .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ....... ......... ...... . .. ... ... ........... . ........ : .......... ........ ....... ........ .......... ....... ......... ........ ......... .......... .......... ...... w . ......... . . . . . . . ... ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. ....... ............ .......................... ........ ........................ ... .. ..... ....... : ......... .................. ........ ........ z .................. ........ ........ ............. .... ....................................... ................. ............... ....... . . . . . . . . U) ...................I........: .................... I ............ ................................... .. .............. .................. .............. ........ ...... ........ ........ ................................................... : .......... .......... ................................. ........................... ........ ................. . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . w........ ........ .......... ....... ........ .................................................................... .................................................................................... ............................ .......... .......... ....... ............. .... ........... ........ ....... .................. .......... ........ . ................... ......... ........ ........... ........ ............................................. ................................. SNOIIVA313 0 . 0 co fl- . .......................................... ... .. .......................................... . ............................. ..................... ......... ............................. ..... ..... ......... .......... 3NII AIU3dOHd ............... .......... ......... ......... . ............................ ................... ......... ....... ......... ........ ....... ......... ........Q .... ................. ....................... . .............. . ............................... ................ ........ ........ ......... ........ w ........ ......... . ...... ........ ......... . ...... . ........ ......... . ...... ....... ......... ........ .. ... .............................................................................................. ........ ........ .......... z ... ..... ....... C), .. ..... ........ .. .... ........ ........ ........ ................ U)- ........ ....... ................... ................... ..... ........................................................... ........ ......... ........ ........ ........ ......... ....... ... .... ... . ........ .......... ............... ...................................... ...... .... ........ ............. . .................. w U)- .......... ......... ............ .................................................................. ..................... .......... ......... ... ... ......... ......... ............ .................. .............. ........... ...... ... ............. ................... .......... ......... ......... .............. .................... .......... ................ ......... ......... .................. ......... .......... .. .... ......... ......... ... .......... ....... .......... ......... ................ . .................. ....... ..................... . ........................................................................... 0 0 0 0 0 rl- 0rl- SNOIIVA313 SNOIlVA 13 I • • Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 Other drainage includes the capillary break under the . floor slabs, which. was described to HEMPHILL as 4 inches of %4' clean gravel overlain by sand. That would certainly be better than the, capillary break recommended by Cascade, which could not stop capillary water, and would actually, conduct j capillary water to the underside of the slabs. DRIVEWAY HEMPHILL considers the original driveway design to be defective, and the existing driveway to be - satisfactory based on the location of the house- and the elevation differential between 'the driveway drainage and the City of Edmonds property line. The 24.5 foot section that slopes 20.86/o is acceptable, and is not hazardous. A long driveway at 18% might be hazardous, and a short driveway at 25% might not be hazardous. The arbitrary standard of 20% maximum slope is not page 6 of 7 pages Any other drainage is not necessary, since all other living areas are above the ground surface, and no other walls need protection from hydrostatic pressures. Therefore HEMPHILL considers the drainage to be adequate, and better than specified, and any deviations from the plans and/or specifications are either better or necessary. necessarily a protection of the life, health, and property,of the public. Recent numerous litigations have achieved similar conclusions that arbitrary standards should not be considered to be appropriate for all conditions and situations. Standards can be considered to be an upper limit above which a qualified professional. engineer registered by the state should evaluate the conditions from a proper engineering perspective based on the : protection of the life, health, property, and welfare of the public. H�� rPHrIrLL E Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 In nearly every litigation the conclusions were that most standards were established too low either as the result of the fear of litigation, or by unqualified personnel. A conclusion was that inflexibility by building departments is generally based on fear of litigation, and not on proper engineering practice by qualified personnel. Dale C. Hemphill P.E. Registered Engineer No. 14777 State of Washington page 7 of 7 pages As observed on this project if a variance was required for all adjustments made 'at the time of construction as the result. of uncertain information, of defective design, or of improper recommendations, then construction would be impossible. Of course changes cannot be at the discretion of the contractor, but should be either recommended or approved by a qualified engineer. OV WAS A y� x � 14777 C` O FC1SiE[L� s70NAL EXPIRES 17 FEBRUARY 1994 1—,T, I Q JJ rP HrIrL L STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCI, INC. 5630 - 198th St. S.W. P. O. Box 5366 LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 (206) 775.7434 ('Blj1'LQING TO p� D 19Q N" jr_-PrjO,v05 Ulk ct(-O Z© GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter L1E`T`VAkF VIRUZEDUTRL DATE - 9a JOB NO l sue ATTENTION RE: Attached El Under separate cover via Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION G� - 3- L ^ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use - )EIVAs requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Exceptions taken as noted Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO Kenyon Printing - Edmonds - 775-9494 SIGNED: /W ) If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. I CTRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES 6 0 198th St. SW P.O. Box 5361* 63 6 ,eMWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 Iv jo SUBJECT: Cnc-e-rL-1- - w SHT: P I OF BY: P14- DATE: -3-23-90 CHKD: JOB NO: IJ I LD ING PAVt-� AU G 5' 70 A af-DA -AWAO, 0 c of R 4 1?". + s�.5 5T 4. CrloP- S = t2 Y, 1 S7 7-37, B, ta y z, '57 t57 I 5TI stn Le T- C- c- pus 'K JOB 30 7 -2 5,(, 6,YOt I i? ---45 p '170 OF A-/io & s 5F 14 5�4610 r Imp-etzri-C—A Act:-:- kf-<4 `. L- 4- jq(. 5 2- -.5; F - 7-1 aAi t-, o I J A-C 0. 05 (9 -1-1 AC4,es- e,-,,#/ F, 4 - L) tAc",#Js iAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INO SUBJECT: AM SHT: 1) 2_ OF 198th St. SW P.O. Box 5366 mw WOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 BY: L> DATE: -3 -1 C' v CHKD: JOB'NO: q1-5(3 R GH ' 51N DETENTION PIPE LENGTH r 1 MIN, 2' MAX COVER — 2 /-'I% 5LOPE+ s COKTROL CATCH dAS 1 t17 SYSTEM CROSS SECTION SEE PAGE .3 FOR OUTLET CONTROL. DETAIL FP&A OUTLET CONTROL CoNTaoL• .e7 ,. TO OUTLET 2' s 2' a &o ' OEMP, ,t b" SPAL" Wa wou—) r-2'. 2' r 3" DEU0.0000'- CRUSHED RDC.K RIPRAP ONIET wAsmED b vEL rOUTFLO7A7- CH, MIN 10' LONG, TOP IfF PIPEZD DE LgVEL FROM OUT,.ET CON-rRDL 4` PERF PIPE ITH CAPS RUNOFF SPREADER 0 ET STORD DRAINAGE PLAN DETENTION SYSTEM PAGE I OF 3 for Gor, E12.T F Soo ,i'uG, L6l Q - 51"AI.1E PV- STANuc1ou0 location/(e300 6 o* 751h ftW ttDrloijo.s CA plan by 21(�A.11AAc_ DEr,16*j-2o(3,e&T I otu phone 71 S - 7 43 4 date 4 —16 - 90 DESIGN DATA System Imperm Pipe Pipe Orifice Number Area Diam Length Diameter NOTES 1. Call Engineering Division (771-3202) for prebackfill and final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of draipage systems on private property is the resoonsibility of the property owner(s). Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. ,1, °1 J . ! a _- J CITY OF EDMONDS q, .UPPER CATCH g�1N DETENTION PIPE LENGTH COHTRDL CATCH ,(VfiNT) sA514 � MIu 2' KAx COVER OUTLET CONTROL % SLOPE K j- 4- aSll TO OuTTLET. . (too.� SYSTEM CROSS SECTION *SEE PAGE 3 FOR OUTLET CONTROL DETAIL_ FpotA O UtT L ET CON ROL 2' s 2' a W' OAT. A° 6" SPALtS 60vu—) r2'. 2' 3" DEFOA'— CRUSIAED ROCK RIPRAP 00%1-ET WASHED &04vEl rOUTFLOW TR CH, MIh 10' LONG, TOP 4 4" ERF PIPE TO HE LEVEL FROM OVT.Er CONTROL 4' %RF PIPE ITH CAPS RUNOFF SPREADER 0 ET STANDARD DRAINAGE PLAN OTENTION' SYSTEM PAGE I OF 3 for �OGErLT SOiJS .iNG, � (do D (o — 52. "' At/L I.�w STA tiIIXIOuI� location�G300 3c.� oi: 75'B' it 'V rnvV0.S w plan by 21Wt-JUKAL. QL06N —2.TeTT I y--(wt phone - 71 S' �-7 41 4 date- 4—t8-90 DESIGN DATA System Imperm Pipe Pipe Orifice Number Area Diam ,Length Diameter NOTES 0 1. Call Engineering Division (771-3202) for prebackfill and final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of draipage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner(s). Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. • J CITY OF EDMONDS STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATLS,INC. art I: ur- " •563�3, .198th St. SW P.O. Box 5366 LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 980 BY: >I+. DATE: HKD: JOB NO: 2.1 -5 8 . St 7— A t, APPmy— C OL ofFi.+4 t�iu 9RN11 UffER +5��.�.s�,s+s�xis�L.s-1152�,5 1-0 . 430,oa 4 G(w— S ? M X:1 S+ "_ GAL 5 .�c .s . = g-S•D -r, 3 -f I.-L X .7 = . q2,0 �.LL. _ 72. z X_ ► 5�Tr N Cc— '— Dj bLccNcil ` �/tV70r1.. LZo pe > 5-f-A---ZE- 0L4s SN�10 C 5 4g 30 `Z 4 = 292 S.F S cy 3 .Y-of 1 ? 2 51= 0�. + S �� 4-�52_ 5 F. 17-0 o F . O v. t6L� G S � 7 �} 23 2 S P,/ 4 3,S�Co Q � . D • 0 9 �. _9 ��..5 . 5F fA-rim �.�1L 14 ... = 4� S1= rn � (L�tMo�; F�`�- = 0•�' pAt�t.l7 _ 14 5 d,oti J.Z14. sacs by? 7,L7) FREE-T-yfltfNs a I nva.1 unmL. Lmanj1r rwaVa.1/11 v-o,tlrV. vvvvw • • . •5630, 198th St. SW P.O. Box 5366 LYNN WOOD, WASHINGTON 980 BY: DATE: - 4D HKD: JOB NO: Cp .9 x't9•o9� A ass+ /311 � D,4-53 I.Y K+-mow : Q e ,J Cc - 0,4s3 QALLO. ! D,ts yc l� o x 0.3►1 = d,D.82. CAS. -`7 S,/ru 64', FLt Fc �fis1 .I zt •n�, � o-� c�M��tn�--no r� V� C3(o07' t t� 40 Qu T 2c1,,�Y VS �,3Si2a — 4J p.S�s 2 •0.3.5 �finYn`L�`�Sk�kGD e J {vfinL' 14(e?,45: 311 )c 4 S3 = ?-(5 Fat 3GCAP. STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. SUBJECT: OF -563q ►198th St. SW P.O. Box 536 LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 980 BY: ; DATE: HKD: JOB NO: 9!- S -e) 05 M T t.� .� /. F C. = s �7 K �v nvQ n,.i- c•t: l� I L r-o(L 3o fM s��n�. I�,�s�cz�3o 7•S! s"n �3.m'�ty •, s c� = s-� .eo 3 , s :- sue. I3 � hiM 5lzc Oc, ;::,IC.Cr5 IFG S 44, 44 4i f g_ CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32Ga- 16w MAY! 4 .PERMIT 09NITER Gogert and Sons, Inc. 16606 52nd Avenue N.W. Stanwood, Washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Addendum to Geotechnical Report for Gogert Residence 16300 Block 75th'Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: At your request, we have completed an addendum to our geotechnical report dated January 8, 1990 regarding the basement retaining wall design. We have reviewed Plan 3332 of the pier foundation prepared by Structural Design Associates, Inc. dated January 22, 1990. The structural notes regarding pier capacity reflect the design parameters recommended in our soils report. We did not review any of the structural design. No lateral forces for the retaining walls were listed. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended in our soils report may be designed to resist an active lateral force equivalent to a fluid having density of 45 p. c. f . The colluvium and the underlying native soil were assumed to have a passive resistance of 200 and CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Page 2 250 p.c.f., respectively. The latter parameter was calculated separately from the design parameters provided in our soils report and was verbally communicated to SDA, Inc. on January 22, 1990. The recommendations provided in our soils report for this site have been incorporated into the proposed foundation design. The following exceptions are outlined below. The retaining walls proposed for the garage front and the east side of the basement should be backfilled with a free draining material as specified in our soils report. We recommend that the basement slab -on -grade be placed on a capillary break as specified in our soils report. As shown on Figure 2 on the provided plan, the retaining wall lug is shown to penetrate one (1) foot into the native soil. No subgrade is indicated for the four and one-half ( 4--+-,/2 ) foot long toe. We recommend that the entire wall foundation be seated into native soil. We estimate that the native soil is approximately a foot below the toe. We should observe the excavation for the wall foundation to verify that it is founded on the native soil. • • January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Page 3 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, AGE E CASCAD EOTECHNIL; ° ''� ( e• QP h �. y ; u i C Principal Engineer 4% 1ti son Olsson j eologist JO:mrm CASCADE TESTIt L-ABORATORY. INC. TESTING 81 INSPECTIO. NGINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 9603 (42n T EVERETT 12 DEC 13 1991 TO: 'CJ Ci e I - © S� /G 4 SZ A,. A/,k/, 9 ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIFI M TFST DATA N° 61788 SEE FIELD REPORT No. DATE l[CERT. NO. F PRO T LOCATION 1163" l73 BLDG. PERMIT NO. CSC:,/5 OWNER WEATHET TEMP. %%D AT f �8 AM �(7 // �7alWe I/s AT PM ENGINEER ARCHIT CT 1 l - Yue uV .'e�:T I /2 S CONTRACT r SO /2 s 00'% © Y TRUCK SAMPLED / TRUCK TICKET No. Y LyS -7 70 TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR ,—O G 11Mr�[ Cyl v c J I n crvU In. BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT .J FA. C.A. WATER TOTA � ' l CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADK DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. GOS9 11- I <8 `% 6X/2- IzSood 44zo � G 0$ Iv8 1(5000 5840 IGz000 57 30 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE �l !� CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED 411 � AEA ADMIX. / CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH%3 PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES -Ya S P yn'en:l l ? INSPECTOR: COPIES TO C, F)(�C/1 1 1 SIGNED: CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & NSPECTION / ENONEERS / GEOLOGISTS MCI 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE. ICWKLANO. WA 98034 12061923-9800 EyERETT �u6r'i259- iaCX"7 Nov 1.3 1991 ATTN: (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED RESTEELICONCRETE RESTEEL/MASONRY OTHER (LOCATION (AREAS RESTEEL ONLY STR.ST/WELDING STR.ST/BOLTING I PREVIOUS N ° 73,533 REPORT No. DATE CERT. NO. -1az.E PRO E T >>/J 9S (l LOCATION /bw . �s PIW wro`z BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER 910� is WEATHER TEMP. '/ D ATI�eAM d howe V S [n AT PM ENGINEER IL,ril I ClJ I -}- SIP VG1 V^ae 1NTRACT R -+ / er 1 � sob? 5 C S (3) 1TEMSINSPECTED _ FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILES DRILLED PIERS a d ol" FOUNDATIONS SLAB j& sekw 4� _ COLUMNS WALLS BEAMS CO5 NCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. �J� DESIGN STRENGTH (Pc) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SPECIMENS CAST X `j('7` SLUMP (INCHES) J 3 / SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. `� 1 7 9 9 AIR / CONTENT (%) Id YES _NO _ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY r.6PIES TO: . ap MSO',� FORM NO. CTL-89-1 CASCADE TESTI LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTIO NGINEERS /GEO ISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINCT014 9803a ( 61823-9800 E VERETT 9-081 7 a Q TO: fJ Q e /4 to L 6-2 AY 9 ATTN THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED ac c e FI FI n TFST nATA o v2 a . SEE FIELD N O 61788 REPORT No._, le DATE / It ///z v CERT. NO. I !�! 1 off~ T PRO f �/ I rum , !E 10 C, co qj 4 LOCATION kdn,0.4S BLDG. PERMIT NO. O&/5 OWNER WEAT`HEVs, G ILatile %/s TEMP. D � AT/8 AM �� AT PM ENGINEER ARCHIT€CT 1 -Wuc I L/ V4, S- Li s CONTRACT © , TRUCK SAMPLED 16 TRUCK TICKET No. Y Z 65 Z/ 70 TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT' FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT / FA. C.A. WATER TOTA CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. C00$g i/ �� 11- I$ `7 �X�2 lz.5oco 44z-o � v$ ^--)j0 Goq� PRODUCERS: CONCRETE�MENT" CU. YARDS PLACED ,p� �/ AEA ADMIX. CAC12' % DESIGN STRENGTH% . PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES -bQ. S P Vji e n- �a LIGNED %��i CASCADE TESTI�' LABORATORY. INC. TESTING BeINSPECTI NGINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 NE. 126*« PLACE KIRKLAND. WASHWGTON 90034 f2061023.9000 EVERETT 42061 259-0017 TO: �i ev sov� 5 n 'J ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CQ C Y te— PIPI ff TFST f%ATA SEE FIELD • N 0- 61625 REPORT No. GATE )/29Z RT. CEmIq g -- /DZRy�T. NO. L PR T Np,!sr ►& m c_ LOCATION g3 o7 /Ill s BLDG. PEERR,MIT NO. OWNER vt! 750 WEATHER I TEMP. AT AM t1 6 AT �� PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR / TRUCK SAMPLED 60 TRUCK TICKET No. TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR c� L- COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT -5I /] FA. 13,70 C.A. WATER TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MAbE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. 5 q� I1 -I �� ,/ 100000 5009 q PRODUCERS: CONCRETE AEA PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES COPIES TO 7 CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED qt ADMIX. / C Cl2 _1 DESIGN STRENGTH �© v ©O ) 1O SIGNED: CASCADE TESTI9AL LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTI NGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAN06 WASHWGTON 96034 112.0`6.1823.9600 EVERETT 1_Y.`imw NOV 0 8 1991 To: � � A'eV t SovL ,- v 2ato N u / p ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CO �, C V e e, GIP# Il TFCT IYOTA SEE FIELD . N 0- 61625 REPORT No. DATE f CERT. NO. q -! aG 1L fzL PrtT sI emc_ LOCATION BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER M WEATHER TEMP. AT AM a �� (p J AT f PM ENGINEER e I-G I 11 S 1� s3oC ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR (Qa et - ©�2 s TRUCK SAMPLED 60 TRUCK TICKET No. OZ TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR 1 13,6 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT /H / FA. /5 13910 90 C.A.©(� WATER TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE M E DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. . q- ,,. -� �� „ l00000 35� %qC6 /-Qn 144000 5(ob 58 11-� o /4'7000 5Z.00 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE AEA ADM IX.4�12 O?_ PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES .y CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED AC1� 1% DESIGN STRENGTH( INSPECTOR: SIGNED: CASCADE TESTI ABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTIO AGINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126r.. PLACE KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 12061823.9800 EVERETT 4206P 259-0817 TO: 6 �DC n�-�LIL.('�Ll� 1 • e�%l ��J 3�l �I %L / G ;?z -2, :Z ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED:. FIELD TEST DATA \-, SEE FIELD REPORT No. N° 62104 DATE CERT. NO. PROJECT LOCATION / Oa I BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER / &, (,r./S -7' of o -e n WEATH R TEMP. AT AM CX h AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ��RACTOR KONT U TRUCK SAMPLED C TRUCK TICKET No. ?v( TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR 4 6, 3 A, v G COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT FA. (J C.A. WATER 2 7 C TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. 15 l o, 3 A 7 mzo oo 43 2-0 /c L21y 9/ ')-�k PRODUCERS: CONCRETE -52- N, l/ A/ /��A !�Z -CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED 3 AEA ADMIX. CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH / � ?y PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES��/ A/ �f P `I �^ A- -I lC/ r Q LJ / /T oP /r ( /Vi- 47�/� COPIES INSPECTOR: SIGNED: CASCADE TES LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTIO / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126— PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHwGTON 98034 (206) B23.9600 EVERETT (2061 2S9.OB 17 TO: ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIFI LN TEST DATe SEE FIELD N ° 62104 REPORT No. -A-i::6 e-, DATE CERT. NO. PROJECT / LOCATION P BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER /6,6"IS, t of o -e WEAHER T TEMP. AT AM (r Z AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT %�` a i" / \ CONTRACTOR TRUCK SAMPLED ` TRUCK TICKET No. 77G6i TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR 2 /7G i 4-7 �) 3% 3� COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT L J C FA. C.A.WATER W2-7 TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. 5Z/5 0 (09 7 O c)-8/% L z� 19%z)c)o 7olo PRODUCERS: CONCRETE -W NI (/ /V��`j CEMENTCU. YARDS PLACED__ AEA ADMIX. -- CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH__ / )�?v PLACEMENT AR�� EA 6 NOTES T a( / L��f�/ (/W p y / �(� // INSPECTOR: Q , z7 SIGNED: CASGAUt 1 tb I IfVlo 1 ter-, � , n v..... TESTING 6 INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS N0- 73514 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE. REPORT No. KIRKLAI`l0•WA96O34 0 12061823-9800 DATE !1 CERT. NO. "�! b Z F— I EVERETT 12061259-OW7 ... q_ � v // 9 Qo M PROJ ) LOCATION 16.3je '76�4 P/ W t ^ BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER TO: O ddd WEATHER TEMP. AT AM ®A_Ve Al,W AT PM p Iti ENGIN ER 7t-1J G ' ewe( ARCHITECT ATTN: CONT CTOR C SO -Q e (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED (3) ITEMS INSPECTED FOUNDATION$ Wq#5 RESTEEL/CONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS _ SLAB RESTEEUMASONRY — STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION O 11 Chi_ Jl ' REAS) 50 " v V ec, , 0, l c eAV cZ e-�- 3 CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. ( DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER Ii1O i1 / )4 L/ TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED �� SPECIMENS CAST SLUMP (INCHES)/ AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. YES _ NO — ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: I rn_,ts ed m� L Lio FIELD REPORT SIGNED: — ;L�� FORM NO. CTL-89-1 CASCADE TESTING LAE3UFiAILJHY, IIVL-;. TESTRJG 6 rgSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS A� NO 78889 12919 N.E. 128TH PLACE. REPORT No. I(SKLANO.WASBC04 I2OQ823-9B0O DATE CERT. NO. EVEFETT B U (L D I259-OB17 l /G - /a L `•• PROJECT , SEP 11 199 .4`-4-91_At< t l3` LOCATION BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM CII&I AT Abd ffM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS RESTEELICONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY —` FOOTINGS _ SLAB RESTEELIMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING i AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION ' (AREAS) / `, /' [ ^/•R S k/ �`/ ! G/Y / L in-.P fWA/ ALc74 ,d cl 1( // s2 coo G%` CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (I'C) . SUPPLIER / 1 p,'V'Aeoi OM tl AM o A,,/ Y TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) K „'�'�/Ln SPECIMENS CAST Z X LI (' 2-0 5; S AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. CAP€S —NO _ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. L� REMARKS: C� %LC9 L 7� <;A,-� cll�U -s. i uv2 12' ,4� ice - / - �.D S 1� P ,t yAIAG o X, e I /�/oar S � %l. P � _ e �I 7�-u f� Ll Y -D vlt 1 � HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: FI ELL) REPORT , i SIGNED: L FORM NO. CTL-89-1 CASCADE TEST LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTI ENGINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 12061823.9900 EVERETT (206) 259.0817 TO: ,/YAQ/�GL--(- CO&C ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: BUILDI O SLPl$1991 FIELD TEST DATA SEE FIELD 7 N 0- 62093 REPORT No.� DATE CERT. NOAl PROJECT 9,e il-/- 11/� lAe-4, LOCATION / llo,6^// �nJ7/�QUW /E %*A! S Y BLDGTP�ER T N 0 /S OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT kAM Q (J�14AT 4m ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR ` /j U .Q TRUCK SAMPLED / T TRUCK TICKET No. ) 4 dS- UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME SLUMP I %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR AIR 5/f, Irux fQli /CONC Cf �0 BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT 7 5� FA. qd `6 /S C.A. WATER Z TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. 5-7l ( q r3 /9 l 2 x l 5 Z00 4'9 40 57 z0 gr 5-7-2 .,etl uu r *-Ak A00 N U! tOM-PA4110EMENT , /0-P CU. YARDS PLACED PRODUCERS: QONC'RETE AEA ADMIX. ZOO 44CAC1 % DESIGN STRENGTH�� t Z/ I(wi -0" -- PLACEMENT AREA 6 NOTES �Lw 4 Tc- C j- �-Q� ly1 a .5 2'� 9/? 1 / A/.A � �' �/! d J'.O c- � COPIES I INSPECTOR: 1 I SIGNED: CASCADE TESTINABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTIO GINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126— PLACE KtRKL.AND, WASHWW TON 99034 12061823-9900 EVERETT t2061 259-0817 TO: *A- Q _Q GL w/1e S BUILDING JUG! '- 1991 ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: C� N° 62093 SEE FIELD^ / DATE �A- X PROJECTER%Di 64- 1 A-/- LOCATION *At 7s�� BLDG. PER IT NO. �l o �e /sue OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT ARM Q (✓C.; AT U M A ENGINEER L R T TRUCK SAMPLED v TRUCK TICKET No. a d� UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME I SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR AIR 94, %CONC �unru BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT 7 FA. qd C.A. WATER { 7 Z TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. 5-719 �� i�� ?� 2 z z00 Z l 500 Z0500 4$ 40 G t 5 0 65 30 57 2- 5-7z �,gfl uu T *'Pk A00 H c4 f4(/l-OdA! CCEMENT Yp-P �L CU. YARDS PLACED �/ T PRODUCERS: QOIVCRETE AEA ADMIX.�2(fZCAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES_tL /o,' /. Q S 4 -f- C.,- COPIES S ri /-, /A/a da- �i0/10s-oG7' INSPECTOR: e7 Jv r � SIGNED: CASCADE TESTI ABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTIO NGINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126T.. PLACE 12061623.9000 KIRKLAW. WASHINGTON 90034 12061259-0617 EVERETT BUJi,,l.. TO: 9 ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: PRODUCERS: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CONCRETE CEMENT ADMIX./looXi.-�-� CAC1 AEA � CQ PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES 11 COPIES TO INSPECTOR: SIGNED: fo N° 66635 DESIGN STRENGTH c CASCADE TESTINOLABORATORY. INC. TESTING 6. INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHNJGTON 90034 (206)023.9000 EVERETT 12061 259-0 17 BUILDING TO: SEQ ATTN THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: SEE FIELD ..D MT Wn 66635 DATE r _ /� f/ r % V CERT. NO. J - e /0 PROJECT L / BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT Q AM C_ Q AT . PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT P r" vAla CONT R TRUCK SAMPLED ? TRUCK TICKET No. UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR CONC AIR BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT 9346, FA. / C.A. WATER { ✓ a' TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. S �- s- R -) z 7 ) 4-5 o o 4-GZ.0 5? e 'D—� 5 1 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE'' yr t CEMENT -� r 2y CU. YARDS PLACED �r,L AEA ADMIX./DO^ CAC1 % DESIGN STRENGTH �yOO PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES INSPECTOR: - COPIES TO: SIGNED: CASCADE TESTING ORATORY, INL:. IN TESTG 6 tlVP SECTl0N / E RS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS • ' •-1 �� '� '� ,0 ` ' -� REPORT NO. 12919 N.E. 12BTH PLACE. KFRKLANO, wA sBo34 12061 823-SBOO DATE ^ / �-!f CERT. NO. �FL—•- EVERETT 12067 25S-0817 PROJECT LOCATIO BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER g�]LDING To: SEP 161991 WEATHER c%,celle- r- TEMP. AT ,,�(-,M 60 AT PM ENGINEER / e. fv a"a / esi ARCHITECT V ATTN: CONTRACTO &zzi f (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS vRESTEEUCONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY — FOOTItsIGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY — STR.STIWELDING GAUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS —, WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION (AREAS) U CONCRETE/MASONRY �� MIX NO. 1' G� v DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER N '7 % L- TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED y SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _4a �r �r' L:5 _ YES _ NO _ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO, REMARKS: Ib /J r / .''/ �� Q�%i lYl% �r� �E' /�% �G%�?�// �•r7� i X y � / S �� /iS �. O0 /C '�Q rd S / 41'11/ �40 o /1 s HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: INSPECTOR: ��6110 FIELD REPOR FORM NO. CTL•89.1 SIGNED: CASCAOE TESTING LABORATORY, IIVU. TESTING& 7VSPECTTON i *EERS i GEoLOG13TS PREVIOUS • N� 71466 R:3 REPORT No. 12919 r LF 126TH PLACE. KIRKLANO. WA 96034 (2061823-S800 DATE CERT. NO. _ 0 2 EVEFIETT 259-OB17 ' / PROJECT A /G 4 ez-74 llle4'10bc.> LOCATIO x 7� Gl% BUILDING .3 BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER TO: �EQ WEATHER TEMP. AT /,QC`AM Cle_d .. t- AT PM ENGINES ARCHITECT j ! �a ATTN: e y ` CONTRACTO e / c�1 (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED LEC RESTEEL ONLY ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS FOO�TI S SLAB RESTEEUCONCRETE _ — _ — RESTEEUMASONRY STR.STIWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS Ile -27 A, a LOCATION (AREAS) -4 CONCRETEIMASONRY �� OpC MIX NO. ` Q DESIGN STRENGTH (Pc) 7 SUPPLIER pp %� C� TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) !/ 1 SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _ YES _ NO — ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. 1 r REMARKS: ee a av-,�P4> ..r'TP/d,-9 Inc 2 / 3/IF oo k a ers� HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: k S -1 FIELD REP m FORM NO. CTL-89.1 SIGNED: CASCADE TESTAb LABORATORY, INC. C TESTINC3 & INSP ION — ENGINEERS 14120 N.E. 21st STREET BUILDIIVG BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98007 SEP 11 199, Project Location J� AIR CAST -IN -PLACE PILE LOG Date l ` 9 Cert No. �/09 -- f02-1 Inspector Page PILE NO. PILE DIAM. (inches) TOTAL PENS. (feet) ELEV. OF CUTOFF 0.00city datum ELEV. OF TIP 0.00city datum PUMP STROKES start finish TOTAL STROKES PUMP PRESSURE (psi) VOLUME OF GROUT (cubic yards) REQUIRED LOAD (tons) NOTES or �-� /6 / D 2, S'wri,- e 3 1� 3% 3Z 3 C-) 3 3/0 u 13 D 5 t a 3§7 10 -56 16 > 3 13 3 106D -4( / o o -� 3r� D 9-78 CASCADE TESTINU L ,CktlLJru% I vr1 T . u TEsff-jsPEC- i , WRS *1 G�EOLOCI-TS PREVIOUS,, IN 7 NO % 8 9 O Q 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE. KS:U<LAN0.WAs9034 I2Oge23-9900 DATE CERT. NO. _ EVEFtE l I 259-D917 /40 2- r PROJECT alk LA� oo `p 03 SLOG. PERMIT NO. OWNER �q WEATHER TEMP.. 37 AT , p AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR /l a 22/L G' OAK S7` (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED (3) ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB — RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STlWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (4) LOCATION (AREAS) CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. ?( DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER ±j9A,- daZ 0/1-4 -�� X TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED G f /� 3 �� 2- SLUMP (INCHES) GCr6.4 A"q 3 SPECIMENS CAST 6,' Z O� U AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. zoy�. YES _NO —ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS. SET NO.�l REMARKS: ,<Dj / eok✓ - /f/�/* AU/U 9 �D�-I G� 41 �''�/f B 20 ic) ;cc,4 �� 7`.4! -6 HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: -6r -R FIELD REPORT: .A FORM NO. CTL-89-1 9:1 CASCAOE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING 6 rtJSPECTION / ESrERS / GEOLOGGTS 129-19 N.E. 126TH PLACE. KSKLAND. WA 98034 I20EI S23-SBM EVERETT f20812.5.9-OB17 To: � / O �-� �? 7C (2o ly5 ?` ATTN: (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEUMASONRY OTHER (4) LOCATION (AREAS) CONCRETEIMASONRY SUPPLIER SLUMP (INCHES) _ AIR CONTENT (%) _ RESTEEL ONLY STR.STIWELDING STR.ST/BOLTING MIX NO PREVIOUS /�/ f V- 78886 REPORT No. DATE Z fRT C? s - l� PROJECT .� r� 4 LOCATION � Q w 0 4 WEATHER, � TEMP. O AT ��® AM A///V/ - AT M ENGINEER CONTRACTOR 'v4o 54 (3) ITEMS INSPECTED — FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILES — DRILLED PIERS M. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SPECIMENS CAST SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _YES —NO _ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. FOUNDATIONS SLAB COLUMNS WALLS — BEAMS REMARKS: �� Ohl 5; f&� �-Q 7�, /( /(rz .sl f ��f 4 1,e7 7,� All) /o/1�qc/ *07I FIC,4-11Ql1- G/V HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY ^ 1 INSPECTOR:` COPIES TO: �o FIELD REPO T SIGNED: FORM NO. CTL-89.1 CASCADE GEOTECACAL, INC. 12911 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 I �V/ AIJ L!/. ATTN:-- �i i i L.��r✓lQ,/ THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: ✓ i&"f-5 . PREVIOUS REPORT No. AlftL No. 7� DATE wJOB M NO. P/R�O E C T/^ LOCATION .0� BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER I /WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT �,� Coo �iG77aN CONTRACTOR '5 ov5 "M MET, �-' MAJU N. "w'm Mj FIELD REPORT ' �.+..1: PREVIOUS REPORT No. CASCADE GEOTECI-SCAL, INC. 12911 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206)821-5080 KIRKLAND, W45HINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 SEP 13 1991 THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: No. L q- � 71 DATE 2 q/ JOB'NO. 11 ��o� - 32 PROJECT log - LOCATION 3 X,,C -4STI4 VZ- u/�C_gr BLDG. PERMIT NO. /4941 OWNER WEATHER.) 7/, X IVI TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR 1 SLo oC /z,� cJL r y A r T / Ar � MR- GECITECHNICAL COPIES TO: e' ar FIELD REP9RT REVIEWED BY: /"- CASCADE GEOTECHWAL, INC. 12911 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 Imp KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 TO: �C�" II-)e- - l6 �0( &kJ DIII ATTN: i `�!� �' 1 lJ eq /j-/�� 3 THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: PREVIOUS REPORT No, No. /(3�J5 DATE 2 JOB NO. 9m -32G P�ROJiCyT LO ATION 47fn4 Pc BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER 41 L v TEMP. AT AM AT PM ®VGINEE �6HITECT 1B /&X-/ •�/S�JC��'J CONTRACTOR I6Q&z/ffzr GCE 5 v , z l lfi*t �li% � Tk1 z C�uJFu2 NJ S.F D� Oi4 (946 e5f� 1 car TD Afi7-0 a) �o 7-ro A)cakd�q .�- LAW/i vall.Jl////�_`�..�/ L�l� �i� �. '7. • �l� 1, & 4-1110 COPIES TO: MIA,- gll it q l FIELD REP RT REVIEWED BY: CASCADE GEOTECF&AL, INC. 12911 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 TO: (aa6k F W N)�s c . ��GI�I��Q u�1 9�212 BUILDING SEP 1 3 199' A THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: 6 /&c kjL), PREVIOUS REPORT No. No. DATE .� Z 1-3Z� JOB NO. PROJECT LOCATION 3 Y, x 46-T-i4 iik BLDG. PERMIT NO. glob 1SIC- OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT- PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR 1 '0 O I Z ' O / coo S l�. o SS 1 0 1_5 0 5 5 !I 0 S� 1Z lao COPIES TO. eum-l- q/ii/gz hELD REPORT REVIEWED BY: CASCADE GEOTECh&AL, INC. 12911 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823-2203 TO: BUILDING SEP 131991 THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: PREVIOUS REPORT No. No. DATE � JOB NO. 42 106— 32 6 PROJE LOCATION Co3 &czv— BLDG. PERMIT NO. !114 /'s— OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR .ID / 44 3 4 g ,0 / l� . ,G / 34 Z� 0 SS ZI 0.�) �3 Z D4 312 24 4-3 ZS 3S COPIES TO: f 9////9/ If If I FIELD P. 9EVIEWED BY: CASCADE TESTINOILABORATORY, INC. TESTING IN INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126— PLACE KIRKLANO, WASHINGTON 98034 12061823.9600 EVERETT I2061 259-0617 ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: U 9199� FIELD TEST DATA SEE FIELD 7F N° 62090 aFPART No_ DATE CERT. NO. g 2�j PROJECT LOCATION ,[ A%tax o ,u BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM A41 AT L a PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR {� TRUCK SAMPLED /S-/ TRUCK TICKET No. UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME I SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR CONC AIR .......... [f cwlr Tu BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT FA. l C.A. WATER TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. 0 ocolea PRODUCERS: CONCRETE l J2I 3 Z0/un 1,C CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED AEA —`- ADMIX. U 7 GD CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH i'r PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES �o s �, -' COPIES INSPECTOR: SIGNED: CASCADE GEOT*HNICAL, INC. 8 6- 0 6 9 12919 N E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821.5080 KIRKLAND, WASI "NC,TON 9803A FAY(206) 823 2201. August 14, 1990 D }.,-,..EIVED Job No. 8906-32G AU u 191 AU G 16 1990 Gogert and Sons, inc. pER1aIl COUNTER SDA, INC. 16606 52nd Avenue N.W. Stanwood, Washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Response to Review Gogert Meadowdale Lot 16405 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: This letter is in response to the Preliminary Geotechnical Review conducted by Landau Associates dated July 20, 1990. We were provided with final building plans, Sheets S-1 and S-2, prepared by Structural Design Associatere prepared by Designarch 29, 1990 Consulta is dated nd Sheets 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 P P January 12, 1990. Sheet 5 was not in the package of plans we received from Design Consultants for this review. The plans we reviewed had been revised by SDA based on our verbal recommendations. The revisions were dated 8/9/90. We have reviewed Landau Associates letter and the revisions. Specific comments are provided below. Grading Plan We concur with Landau that there are elevation differences from the outside finished grades and the interior floor and deck landing elevations that were not accounted for on the original Grading Plan. We originally recommended to SDA that elevation differences be supported with retaining walls or cut slopes. The revised plans we reviewed indicate that the building walls will be constructed as retaining walls on the north and south sides of the building. A short retaining wall is proposed on the south side of the deck landing. The retaining wall will be pile supported and be constructed in accordance with revised detail 1/S-2. pile Foundation eupnort We recommended in our soils report that all foundations be &ASCADE GEOTECHNICAL August 14, 1990 Gogert and Sons, Inc. Job No. 8906-32C Page 2 supported on a pile foundation which penetrates the undisturbed native bearing soils found below the colluvium. An addendum was prepared which recommended that the basement/retaining wall be keyed into the undisturbed native bearing soil. This was based on our understanding that a significant amount of the colluvial soils were to be removed down to bearing soil. We now understand that significant excavations are not proposed for this site. We recommend that all foundations be placed on a pile supported foundation. The revisions we were supported. provided on sheet S-�2 show that all foundations will be pile We recommended in our soils report that all piles penetrate the undisturbed native bearing soil at least five (5) feet and be walla least ten a fminimum of ten (10)piles fe t of penetration. Bearing we recommend soil consists of the stiff silt and dense silty sand underlying the colluvium. We concur with Landau that piles may be longer on to a east monitor the site. We recommend that we be engaged installation of the piles to confirm adequate penetration into the native bearing soils. We do not recommend that an expectedas ethe th to bearing soil be shown on Cross Section , Sheet amaunt of, grading depth to bearing soil may vary depending on the done and the location on the site. ur We trust thatthisan provides sufficient feel free to contact usratoanyntime. Should you have y q sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNI Ge ge E. amb, l Principal 4 :.N%. Engineer t.. Peter�ett Enginsering Geologist cc: SDA; Attn: Robert Hughes STRUCTURAL Ur-blUN Aa,ULAMI ca,uva. 5630 198th St. SW P.O. Box 5366 `LYKNWV0OD, WASHINGTON 98036 a BY: az DATE: -W JOB NO: SG - dG`1 A DMSION OF CASCADE TEsnNG LAQORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. i 26TH PLACE KIAKLAND. WASNINGTON 98034 u00821,5080 FAX! (206) 823.2203 RECEIVED January 30, 1990 Job No. 096-32cFEB a 2 1990 P 13199� 5DA. . SE Gogert and sons, Inc. 16606 52nd Avenue N.W. Stanwood, washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Addendum to Geotechnical Report for Gagert Residence 16300 Block 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: At your request, we have completed an addendum to our geotechnical report dated January 8, 1990 regarding the basement retaining wall design. We have reviewed Plan 3332 or the pier foundation prepared by structural Design Associates, Inc. dated January 22, 1990. The structural notes regarding pier capacity reflect the design parameters recommended in our soils report. We did not review any of the structural design. No lateral forces for the retaining walls were listed. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended in our soils report may be designed to resist an active lateral force equivalent to a fluid having density of 45 p.c.f. The colluvium and the underlying native soil were assumed to have.a passive resistance of 200 and January 30, 1990 3199a Job No. 896-32G S EP 1 Page 2 250 p.C.f-, respectively. The latter parameter was calculated separately from the design parameters provided in our soils report and was verbally communicated to SDA, Inc. on January 22, 1990. The recommendations provided in our soils report for this site have been incorporated into the proposed foundation design. The following exceptions are outlined below. The retaining walls proposed for the garage front and the east side of the basement should be backfilled with a free draining material as specified in our soils report. ;`We recommend that the Basement slab -on -grade be placed on a capillary break as specified in our soils report. As shown on Figure 2 on the provided plan, the retaining wall lug is shown to penetrate one (1) foot into the native soil. No subgrade is indicated for the four and one-half (4 1/2) foot long toe. we recommend that the entire wall foundation be seated into native soil. We estimate that the native soil is approximately a foot below the toe. We should observe the excavation for the wall foundation to verify that it.is founded on the.native soil. January 30, 1990 Job No, 896-32G Page 3 We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, 130ILDING SEP 131990 ..tea 15— — ++csu�a.r, Ar . Principal Engineer `1 son olsson eologist JO:mrm HNICAI— INC. CASCADE: GEOTEC (206) 821 5080 12016 1WVENUE ASHINGTON98034H FAX: (206) 820-6953 KIRKLP,NDND, January 22, 1993 Job No. 8906-32G Mr. Tom Gogert �- 16606 52nd Avenue NorthwestEs Stanwood, Washington 98292 '2 1992 Reference V g T,Wer Gogert Meadow dale Lot 16406 75th Place West Edmonds, Wash1ngton Dear Mr. Gogert our conclusions regarding hale of the project. this �� letter which summarizes requested, we have prepared rformed during the construction p file, As you inspection services that we Pe during our site technical inspec based on our review of the information p�� our project geotec its have conclusions were developed Le�n�,tive's reports which field repo These co d 6, 1991. Copies of these including a review of our field ptember 4, 5, an visits on August 28, 29 been provided to you' provided geO�h°i`� dated January 9, 1990, we luded reCOmmendations that we be engages to for the project, In our soils report ro ect, which inc recommendations ecommendatio s formonitoria cervices for the following: provide construction excavation for the building area erosion control placement � placement of of auger -cast -Piles placement of drain lines placement of baclfill nstniction phase of the project, we were engaged to Provide the following During the CO cervices: tern side of the building construction monitoring located at the eas observation of grading of a vertical cutslope • in foundation area to facilitate placement of excavation s with observation of grading of cutslope auger -cast -piles six (56) auger -cast -Piles for the building's placement of fifty observation of the P (206) 647-9588 foundation FAX: (206) 671-4329 4200 MERIDIAN, SUITE 216 BELLINGHAM, WASHINGTON 98226 ' CAAADE GEOTECHNICAL OC. r ' January 22, 1993 Job No. 8906-32G We did not observe installation of the drain lines or the backfill. Based on a review of the information contained in our file, and on conversations with our field personnel who were present at the site during the dates we provided construction monitoring services, it appears that the work relating to placement of foundation auger -cast -piles, as well as the building excavation grading that we observed, was done in accordance with the recommendations given in our soils -report, dated January 9, 1990, and in our above referenced field reports which were prepared during our visits to the site. We did not monitor any other aspects of the work. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services for the above project. If you have any questions or require any additional services, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely;:,., CASCADE GLQ: _ �TIr:Gi1�GA`" 1 �, f ge p,:E� Kevin Roberts, E.I.T. President l Geological Engineer • IvI31419 4f-5-& ti/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GOGERT MEADOWDALE LOT 16300 BLOCK 75TH PLACE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 896-32G TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope Page 1 Project Description Page 2 Site Description Page 3 Subsurface Soil Conditions Page 3 Ground Water Page 4 Conclusions Page 4 Recommendations Page 6 Site Preparation Page 6 Erosion Control Page 6 Grading Page 7 Structural Fill Page 7 Foundation Design Page 8 Slab on Grade Page 9 Retaining Walls and Lateral Forces Page 9 Drainage Page 10 Environmental Checklist Page 11 Construction Monitoring Page 11 General Page 11 Appendix A Test Boring Location Map Appendix B Test Boring Logs Appendix C Unified Soils Classification System ' CASCADE GEVECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 ' (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 January 8, 1990 t Job No. 896-32G MAY 14 1990 t PERMIT COUNTER Gogert and Sons, Inc. 16606 52nd Avenue N.W. t Stanwood, Washington 98292 ' Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Gogert Meadowdale Lot 16300 Block 75th Place West ' Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: At your request, we have completed a soils report that conforms to. I' the Geotechnical Report Guidelines set forth in the City of Edmonds Ordinance #2661. A Cascade Geotechnical engineering geologist visited the above site on October 4, 1989 to view the site and to determine the subsurface soil and ground water conditions. 11 SCOPE This report provides conclusions and recommendations which specifically address the development of the referenced lot for a single-family home. This report provides a discussion of the slope stability before, during and after construction, and specific recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, lateral pressures, drainage and construction monitoring requirements. • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We have reviewed undated, preliminary building plans provided by ' Gogert and Sons, Inc. which proposed the construction of a 3332 square foot, two (2) story, wood framed residence with a daylight ' basement and a garage. The house is shown to be supported by a spread footing foundation. A two (2) tier wood deck on the basement and main floor levels is planned for the western side of the house. The basement floor will be a slab on grade at elevation 56.6'. The main floor will be at elevation 65.61. The second ' floor elevation will be at 75.41. The garage level will be at elevation 711. Retaining walls, up to five (5) feet and up to nine and one-half (9 1/2) feet high, will be located along the eastern edges of the garage and residence foundations, respectively. An eight (8) foot high cut will be required for the eastern half of the residence. The rest of the house will be at or above the existing ground. A paved driveway is proposed to be built between the garage and 75th Place West. The driveway will be graded to a 14 percent maximum slope. ' A topographic and site map dated October 10, 1989 by Western Surveyors, Inc. has been provided to us. The'City of Edmonds ' requires a review of the final building plans by our office to confirm that our recommendations were properly interpreted. The existing topography and proposed house footprint are shown on the ' map located in Appendix A. U CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 3 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is a rough parallelogram in shape, west to east trending, ' 12,800 square foot property, located west of and adjacent to 75th Place West in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington. The ' ground slopes down from 75th Place West to the west at an angle no greater than 32 percent. The total vertical drop is about 48 feet. ' The property is bounded by single-family residences to the north and south, and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks to the west. The site is located within the Meadowdale landslide complex which is a zone about 400 feet wide adjacent to and immediately east of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks (Roger Lowe Associates ' Landslide Hazard Report, 1979). ' At the time of our fieldwork, the northern and southern edges of the property were thickly covered with blackberry bushes and some ' tall grasses. No standing or flowing water was observed on the property. A catch basin was observed on the south side of the property. It appeared that the water flow through the drainage system was heavy. SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS Our field work consisted of a visual site reconnaissance and the drilling of two (2) test borings. A trailer -mounted, hollow stem auger was used to advance the test borings. Samples were obtained from selected depths in accordance with ASTM D-1586 sampling procedures. At the time of our soils exploration, the proposed residence location had not been chosen. The test boring location map and logs are presented in Appendices A and B, respectively. Soil types CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 4 were described and classified in the field using the Unified Soils Classification System. The Unified Soils Classification System is described in Appendix C. Soil conditions at the boring locations consisted of approximately ' eleven (11) feet of loose colluvium underlain by medium dense sand in Test Boring 1 and stiff silt in Test Boring 2. The colluvium ' consisted of sandy silts and mottled, fractured silts with organic and log debris. ' In Test Boring 1, the sand was observed to grade into a dense silty sand layer (glacial till) approximately four (4) feet thick. ' Underlying the till was a very hard silt. Test Borings 1 and 2 were terminated within the silt at twenty-five ( 25 ) and twenty-nine ' (29) feet, respectively. I GROUND WATER Ground water seepage was observed in Test Boring 1 only. Seepage was noted between eight (8) and about sixteen (16) feet below the ' existing ground level. The seepage occurred that just above the the colluvium/sand interface. It appears relatively impermeable and denser soils found below the looser colluvium ' allows the development of a perched water table. CONCLUSIONS The site is located within a well known landslide debris area. The ' property has been mapped within an old landslide site as shown on ' the Edmonds East and West Quadrangle Geologic Map (WDNR Geologic has been by the Map GM-14, Mackey and Smith, 1971) and classified GeoEngineers Inc. Landslide Hazard Map.(Fig.1 as presented in the t ' CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 5 Meadowdale Site Evaluation Checklist packet) as a 4A30 area. tPreviously failed slump material which has a 30 percent probability of movement in a 25 year period was defined as a 4A30 area. The ' loose colluvium observed in the test borings indicate that movement has occurred on the site; however, no evidence of recent surficial ' movement was noted. At the time of our visit, the site was situated on ground sloping 32 percent or less on the western edge of the Meadowdale slide complex. This area consists of shallow earthflows and slumps which ' have moved on a more frequent basis than the ground east of 75th Place West, which is composed of larger, more coherent blocks. ' (Pg. 8, Roger Lowe Associates Landslide Hazard Report, 1979). We expect that -the construction of the residence will not decrease the ' stability of the site or of the surrounding area, if our recommendations are followed. The site is presently stable but the owner shold be aware that the potential for slope instability will ' continue to exist after construction. It is our conclusion that the colluvium is not suitable for the support of a structural load if significant differential settlement and an increased probability of slope failure is to be avoided. All structural loads should be transferred down through the colluvium to the medium dense sand, dense silty sand or hard silt. I Detailed recommendations for the proposed residence are provided 1 below. 1 � I 1 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 6 ' RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation We recommend removing all vegetation and topsoil from the proposed ' building area. Excavated material should be removed from the site. We also recommend leaving the existing vegetation intact in areas ' outside the proposed building location during construction. These areas may be cleared and planted with erosion resistant vegetation ' or landscaped in the future. We recommend that the earthwork be done during an extended period ' of dry weather. The fine-grained colluvium noted at the surface of the site may cause significant additional construction costs tand slope instability from the adverse effects of wet weather construction. Erosion Control At the time of our visit, the slope was not undergoing any active erosion. We expect that any erosion will be minimized as indicated in our recommendations (See "Drainage"). Erosion control during construction should consist of straw and/or geotextile fabric barriers placed downslope from the construction area, and should be constructed so as to prevent any sediments from being deposited on the lower slope.; We recommend placing visqueen sheets over any cuts during wet weather construction to minimize erosion. We should review the detailed erosion plan prior to construction. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 7 Grading It appears from our review of the building plans that less than 50 ' cubic yards of fill material will be placed on the site to raise the grade on the east side of the house and to lessen the slope angle in the paved apron area. The fill material should be placed according to our recommendations given in the Structural Fill ' section. ' I•t appears that an eight ( 8 ) foot cut will be made in the east side of the residence foundation. We recommend that any unsupported cuts into the loose colluvium should be graded to 1.5H:1V or ' flatter and covered with visqueen. If caving or spalling is noted during construction alternative recommendations may be necessary. ' We should be engaged to monitor the excavation to verify that our recommendations are followed. Structural Fill We understand that structural fill will be used to support the pavement east of the garage area retaining wall where grades require it. The structural fill should consist of imported fill which meets the following gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25 - 75 #200 5 maximum based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL • ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 8 Fill should be placed in twelve (12) inch maximum lifts and compacted to 90 percent of the ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density in the paved area. Fill should be placed under dry conditions only. When a dry, non - yielding subgrade is established, the pavement section may be placed. Foundation Design Based on our test borings, we recommend placing the residence on drilled piers or auger cast piles. This would transfer the building loads to the underlying bearing soils and reduce the load on the colluvium. We recommend that the residence be supported by eighteen (18) inch diameter drilled piers or auger cast piles which_ penetrate at least five (5) feet into the medium dense sand, dense silty sand or hard silt. Individual piers/piles may be designed for an allowable bearing load of twenty (20) tons, and a lateral load of five (5) tons. We estimate that each pier/pile under the eastern and western edges of the residence should have a minimum total length of sixteen (16) feet. Piles/piers under the basement retaining wall should have a minimum total length of ten (10) feet. We should be engaged to observe the drilling of the piers to confirm penetration to the recommended depths. The spacing of the piers/piles should be selected by your structural engineer. We recommend a minimum grout strength of 3000 psi to help ensure pier/pile quality. The piers/piles should be stopped at the ground surface and a grade beam foundation should be used to span from pier to pier. The grade beam foundation should be designed by your CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ' January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 9 structural engineer and we should be engaged to review the final plans. It should be understood that the recommended depth of penetration specifically refers to the depth of penetration into the undisturbed bearing soil and does not take into account the overlying loose colluvium. The estimated lengths discussed here are based on the preliminary plans we were provided. Slab on Grade The basement slab on grade may be placed on a cut into the ' colluvium. We recommend that the basement slab on grade floor be structurally tied into the foundation, and designed to span between supports. A four (4) inch layer of clean sand, pea gravel or crushed rock having less than 5 percent material passing the #200 ' sieve based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve, should be placed below the slab as a capillary break. We recommend placing a vapor barrier between the bottom of the slab and the capillary break ' material. IRetaining Walls and Lateral Forces ' We understand that a nine and one-half (9 1/2) and five (5) foot high retaining wall is anticipated for the eastern edge of the house and garage, respectively. Both retaining walls should be supported by a pile/pier foundation as specified above. The ' basement retaining wall should be designed to allow the lateral passive load to be distributed over the other piles/piers under the lower level foundation. All retaining walls should be ' backfilled with a free -draining granular fill which conforms to the following gradation: • E CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 10 Sieve Size 4 inch #4 #200 Percent Passing 100 25 - 75 5 maximum based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve. The free -draining fill should extend from the base to the top of the retaining walls, and should extend at least three (3) feet behind the wall. A perforated pipe footing drain, bedded and backfilled with twelve (12) inches of pea gravel should be placed at the base of the walls. The drains should continue around the perimeter of the walls and should be tightlined to the drainage system. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended may be designed to resist an active lateral force equivalent to a fluid having a density of 45 pcf. This assumes a horizontal backfill, and backfilling which precedes first floor framing or other constraints on wall deflection. The colluvium may be assumed to have a passive resistance of 200 pcf equivalent fluid pressure. Drainage We recommend placing a four ( 4 ) inch diameter rigid perforated pipe that is bedded and backfilled in at least eighteen (18) inches of pea gravel at the base of all perimeter footings. The footing drains should be tightlined away from the foundation to the storm sewer system. U CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL 0 January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 11 All roof drains should be tightlined to the storm system separately from the footing drains to avoid backflow. Paved areas should be curbed and graded to direct surface run-off to a suitable catch basin that is tightlined to the storm system. Additional drainage may be necessary in the landscaped areas. Yard drains will likely be necessary to avoid a wet backyard. Environmental Checklist We have reviewed the Environmental Checklist prepared by Western Surveyors, Inc. and have addressed the significant issues with regards to Earth within the text of this report. Construction Monitoring We should be engaged to observe the excavation for the building and placement of the erosion control to confirm that construction is done in accordance with the approved plans. We should be engaged to observe the placement of the auger cast piles or drilled piers to confirm adequate penetration into suitable bearing soil. The placement of the drain lines and backfill should be observed by our office to confirm proper placement. These services are in addition to any required testing agency work. General A detailed review of the final plans is required by the City of Edmonds specifications. Once final plans are available, we will provide a detailed review with any additional or alternate recommendations that may be necessary. 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. ' Page 12 We expect the on -site soil and ground water conditions to reflect ' our findings; however, some variations may occur. Should soil conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we recommend that we be contacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate recommendations are required. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gogert and Sons, Inc. for the specific application to the proposed residence located on the 16300 Block of 75th Place West in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington, in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNI� GE. rge L P.® :�'• ason Olsson ••'�•``' " Geologist Principal Engin B,cF':c/STE;� O`1�ryai �1ass�OWA1. Eti APPENDIX A OZco 00 Q � � Z N cr_ Ocm I W I o co ;To �w� W vj 30NWIS38 `r ` 03sodow I to O J )03c' co LO \ LO -LO N Ln M •v •v 'Y •8 z a J a N z w 9 O cr LL Go 0) N a w CD cr W Q o 0 M X� � O W cc CL CL Q W Q -� W > J Q CC m= N Q 3 Uo cD O M Q 00 U *__ U o� Zm p J o `CD ' , Q w o �8 w Go� zN N 2 to L-) Z > ZN LU p 'ui W w .1 k1- Q sooQ 3 m S z m Z Z Y V N Y W to � W 0 W O�0v�_ N CL W :J LA N v o 2 .� W LL N Q O N N Q Z W o Q: tASrnY W o+ cc Q ;_: ]C • • APPENDIX B 1 1 LI n 1 Project . 1o6 No. 8 6 - 32G Date 10/04/89 Boring No. 1 Dwn.By HLA GOGERT MEADOW E Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Type SKID MOUNTED Goo/Eng. P . J EW ETT Hole 0 4" 0. D. Fluid a> Penetration o s m a o Soil Description & Classification Notes E o 10 N 3 a o I COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH MINOR GRAVEL, MOTTLED, 2 3 7 10 FRACTURED SILTS WITH SANDY MATRIX, LOOSE, DAMP TO 5 WET. 10/04/89 I 2 4 4 8 COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH ORGANIC DEBRIS, LOGS, 10 GRAY, SATURATED, LOOSE. I SAND; GRAY, SATURATED, MEDIUM DENSE, VERY FINE-- �F 2 5 10 15 GRAINED, GRADES TO SILT WITH LAMINATES OF SAND, 15 GRAY. (SP-ML) •': SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAY, DAMP, DENSE, 4� 8 12 18 30 '.' GLACIAL TILL. (SM) i 20 I SIFT,; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY, 10 30 140 VERY HARD, DAMP. (ML) T.D. = 25.0e A e i Notes: CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL TEST BORING LOG A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. Page 1 of �_ Project 0 GOGERT MEADOWDALE Job No. - 32G Date 10/04/89 Boring No. 2 Dwn.By HLA Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Type SKID MOUNTED Goo/Eng. P . J EW ETT Hole 0 4". 0. D. Fluid >a m C a `) � oo Penetration Soil Description & Classification a Notes N o m \ m I3 I I2 I13 I12 I12 5 WOOD; *HIGH BLOW COUNTS IN LOG. COLLUVIUM; FRACTURED SILT IN MATRIX OF VERY FINE SAND & SILT, MINOR TRACE ORGANICS, GRAY, DAMP. GRADATIONAL CONTACT SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY, ASH LAYER, STIFF, DAMP. (ML) SILT; GRAY, VERY HARD, DAMP, MASSIVE. (ML) SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) 12 5* 17* 0 2 2 2 4 15 4 6 10 20 17 21 38 25 15 18 33 18 29 47 T.D. = 29.0' Notes: CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TEST BORING LOG Page 1 of _�_ • • APPENDIX C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UNIFIED S LS CLASSIFICATIW SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL LETTER DESCRIPTION `40o c9'e W Well' graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures, CLEAN , 4 pp.:. ao:.:aQoo-.,: little Or no fines Poorly graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures, GRAVELS GRAVEL 6 G P ir"�! Rir'ae;rf little or no fines GRAVELLY , SOILS ; GM Silty gravels or gravel -sand-silt mixtures GRAVELS .WITH FINES COARSE GC Clayey gravels or gravel- sand -clay mixtures GRAINED ° PP p O° Well -graded sands or gravelly sands, little or SOILS CLEAN °• Op pp°O SW no fines o P e '{i '.•''? ': Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little SANDS SAND b ;:.i.;:;:;i; SP or no fines SANDY SOILS SM Silty sands or sand -silt mixtures SANDS WITH FINES SC Clayey sands or sand -clay mixtures Inorganic silts & very fine sands, rock flour. silty M L or clayey fine sands, or clayey silts with slight SILTS & CLAYS plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, CL gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays or lean clays Liquid Limit Less Than 50 t I t t I t i Organic silts 3 organic silty clays of low FINE I l l l I i I i Ittlltl l t l I I i OL plasticity GRAINED MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine SOILS sandy or silty soils, elastic silts S I LTS 3 CLAYS CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 �i�i�i Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, OFi organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS -- - PT Peat or other highly organic soils TOPSOIL n w'^ Humus 3 duff layer FILL Uncontrolled. with highly variable constituents SYM SOL DATUM NOTE I2" O.D. Split Spoon Sampler Sample Interval URing or Shelby Sampler, Sample Interval P Sampler Pushed Sample Interval Other Sample Type Sample Interval SY SOL DATUM NOTE SZWater Level Date Recorded Ts Torvane Reading qu Penetrometer Reading iWater Observation Well Tip Elevation CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF KEY CHART CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 01-1 �` .0mlll'z n Q_()')-. Q 0- 3 0 W c -N "<. C Cil CD C+ �Q. -70Q .- rD 00 n CD 170 rD 01) p O O O X <+ c+ c+ Q. O 7 7 -0 < r0 n rlD-- ro -5 p -- ro p oco co r0 ry Ul -,,I W o f W o o - c+ o <.+ i �o fU � fU fU VI CA) N o New 'o Sunroor� j 41n. m O - m ;an o Cr �� . m I < F- -+ C n m O 1___& c� ' rn. O � 0 - - - ---Fr m 0 L ,? o -}m Co ver A Existing ? i House ru .a Garage 8 2' 75-th PL, W. t cn CD O o o, ��m; I - Q m ��. (0 o OL � a) (U - CD 9 D Z: (D Z 0 (D Y_ i ♦••,,• M FILE JAN 141994 ,COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City. of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: 1. Desc _pticr, cf SUb ;e"t pr -ert r This anant o notification and indemnification/hold harmless �relates to a tract. of land at the street address of�ai_.'.`��=Sl- _ ( insert street address), Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as : —060 �10 0,nCS 07 /�s dtwl4e�� 5_1312_-� _��O tl'0144 64oQ 14�i 2i� 4� 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site -(hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a. potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by. technical consultants and engineers, engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -1- g�IL01NG wSS/klt 02/08/90 /�u�u�i�✓b ��d�f/av FEB 9 - 19Q0 the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number 0t-10�� (insert number) on file with .the City -of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or. prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions.. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents -of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest. in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content. of the file and the City urges review of its contents_ The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at. the Planning Department, City of Edmonds, 505 Bell Street,,. Edmonds, Washington 98020_ 3., Indemnification and Hold -harmless. The undersigned OWNERS .hereby waive any and all liability associated with - development, stating that they have fully informed themselves•of all risks associated with development of the property and do" therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -2- 14SS/klt 02/08/90 arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability .or' damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out.of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, orprofessional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit_ 4.. Insurance Requirement._ In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/ice (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: *Per City Ordinance #2866, the owner shall post a policy of general public liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured against personal injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from or -out of the City's involvement in the permitting process and from earth movement. [insert insurance requirements and time period' This policy shall be renewed annually for a period of not more than ten years from the date of occupancy approval. WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -3- WSS/klt 02/08/90 5. Covenant. to Touch and Concern the Land_ This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required_ DONE this - day of 199-�-- OWNERS) By: By: By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) / ) ss: COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that�ro,�� %trn� .signed this instrument and acknowledged G°d .Q' WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -4- WSS/klt 02/08/90 it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument_ DATED this /ay of 4 199 NOTARY PUBLZIE My commission expire:MiCOMMISSIIQN IRES3-1-4I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss: COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this day of 199_. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory . evidence that signed this instrument, on oath. stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the (title) of (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed)- to be the free and voluntary act of such party -for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument_ DATED this day of , 199_. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -5- WSS/k1t 02/08/90 CITY CLK _ BUiLD1�4.G. 1/ CIVIC ceN , `:; JAN 14 1994 EDMONDS• WA 020 COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS M Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State M Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City. of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a, building a— � permit for the construction of a .residential structure and ® attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant-, stipulate and promise as follows: - 1. nescrip..icn Cif sub -,act Pr2perty. c;,vcnana.. of 0 411 notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract 1&17419G//7 IllVeS7- of land at the street address of ( insert . street address), Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: 1-or /O, 11SL 1-�edS13/Z9..�irro . 6,0G4 CAP Ma .2 Z) 9� ram, 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site -(hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area r which has lieen identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential -for earth subsidence or landslide' hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been - evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the. process to obtain a building permit for the subj ect site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of WSS52079A/0006.040-0.34 -1 VOL. 285'7PdcE282'7 RUILOtNG [•:SS/klt 02/08/90 . 13U& 1,V6 �1A11f1 v FEB 9 - 19Q0 the risks associated with development are contained in building a permit file number (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or. prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest. in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of.its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal- business hours or copies obtained at. the Planning Department, City of Edmonds, 505 Bell Street, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby. waive any and all liability associated with - development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the .property and do' therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of'Edmonds, its officers, agents. and employees WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -2- WSS/k1t 02/08/90 '940120.0160 VOL ..285'7PABE2828 arising from and out of such development_ In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and .assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability .or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or arising out of .any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4.. Insurance Requirement.. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community -,Services-Director has/� (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy -for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in -order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: *Per City Ordinance #2866, the owner shall post a policy of general public liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured against personal injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from or -out of the City's involvement in the permitting process and from earth movement. (insert insurance requirements and time period, This policy shall be renewed annually for a period of not more than ten years from the date of occupancy approval. WSS52079A/0006.040..034 WSS/klt 02/08/90 `40 1 2 0 01 6 9- -3- 0 vot. 2 8 5 7 PAGE 2 8 2 9 5. Covenant to'. Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This - provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. DONE this -� day of 199 S `; �'•`.� VL �CiT ..... STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: ' COUNTY OF S ) OWNERS) By: "JIL By: By: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that66oe '%�rnr•,.�� signed this instrument and acknowledged' WSS52079A/0006.040.034 WSS/klt 02/08/90 -4- 94012001 6 �- VOL. 2 8 57 PAGE 2 8 90.0 it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument_. `DATED this adAay of Lw'i� 199 y.. _ o�: �✓ �Y: _ NOTARY PUBLIZ r _ My commission expireffYCOMMISS'QNEXPIRE53'1-iI jj F,-' WASHINGTON ) 1.01 G►� � ', . ) s s : COUNTY OF ) �r "Certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this day of 199_, NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as -the (title) of (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed)•.to be the free and voluntary act .of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this day of WSS52079A/0006_040.034 WSS/klt 02/08/90 140120 016 9 199_, NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: -5- VOL. 2 8 5 7 PA 2 8 31 71 /( /6 C - -& ` R K CIVIC CENTER STREET FILE �G t EDMONDS. WA 98020 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION, CORRECTION AND HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION Whereas, the undersigned property owners have been cited for violation of the development codes of Ahe City of Edmonds, Washington relating to the construction of a driveway, a portion of which exceeds twenty percent (20%) grade and failure to obtain administrative approval for grades in excess of fourteen percent (14%), and Whereas, development regulations in the City of Edmonds does not permit construction of driveways whose grades are in excess of twenty percent (20%) and requires administrative approval to exceed fourteen percent (14%); and Whereas, the portion of the driveway in question is a relatively minor portion of the driveway, the proposed purchaser of the property has been informed of the existence of the violation, and in this agreement the owners acknowledge the violation and agree to plead guilty to a civil infraction for violation of the City's ordinance, and Whereas, the parties have entered in this settlement agreement in order to provide notice of defect to future purchasers and to set forth the timing and conditions under which such defects shall be corrected, now, therefore, The undersigned Property Owner (hereinafter "Property Owner") and the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") does hereby - acknowledge, stipulate and agree as follows: �.a 1. Existence of Violation. :' 1.1. Property Owner. The Property Owner hereby stipulates and admits pursuant to the issuance of building permit no.%G��.S , the Property Owner applied for a permit to construct various improvements on a piece of property located at 16406 75th Place West, Edmonds, Washington and legally described as shown on the Attached Exhibit A. This property is referred to in the balance of this agreement as the "Subject Site." One of the improvements permitted was the construction of a driveway. That driveway was shown on plans as having various grades throughout its length, none of which exceeded on said plan drawings a grade of twenty percent (20%). Section 18.80.060(d) requires the authorization. of the Public Works Director in order for any driveway slope to. exceed, fourteen percent (14%) and prohibits authorization of driveways which exceed twenty percent,,(20%). No application to exceed fourteen percent (14%) was submitted and no approval granted. uC z� w rim _ -NJ 'D r-n O X ED ;- +l J i 1.2. A field inspection by the City Engineering Department has verified that a. portion of the driveway. exceeds 20% 0: As part , of the agreement to; forbear from civil action as .set, forth in. this agreement on behalf of the City, the, Property Owner. stipulates, acknowledges and agrees . that the existing driveway is in violation of City ordinance and agrees to, plead.no contest to a civil infraction for violation of the City's Community Development Code and agrees to pay a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00). 2. Notification to Future Purchasers. The undersigned Property Owners agree to .notify any purchaser -of the property of the defect and to record a copy of this document in the chain of title to the property in order to notify future Property Owners both of the ,defeci and of their. obligation. to correct the violation as provided, in Paragraph 7, hold harmless and indemnify the City of Edmonds as set forth in Paragraph 3 and :waive and release it from liability as provided in Paragraph 4. 3. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. The Property Owners, their heirs, successors, and assigns. and all future owners of the subject site hereby promise to hold harmless and indemnify.the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability.of any kind or. nature arising from or out of the City's forbearance from suit. or other administrative, civil, or criminal °action to correct the above noted defect or any damage to persons or property arising therefrom, including, but not. limited to any accident, injury, or damage caused, by the excessive grade of the noted driveway slope. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless includes the reasonable costs of defenseby. counsel of the City's choosing.. 4. Waiver. and Release. The Property Owners on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors, and assigns and any and all future owners of the Subject Site hereby waive and release the City from any :claim, loss, or liability of any kind relating to the . City's forbearance from suit or other civil,, administrative, or criminal action necessary to correct the above noted defect pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 5. Touch and' Concern the Land, Run with the Land. This agreement . is stipulated by the parties to touch and concern the subject site described on the attached Exhibit A and shall run with the land, binding any future owner of the property. 6.. Forbearance from Suite. In consideration of the promises of the: Property Owner and their heirs".successors, and assigns, including any and all future owners of the.. property, as set forth in this. agreement, the City agrees to forbear from civil; criminal, or administrative action which may be at.its.disposal to correct the above noted defect. So long as the terms of this agreement. are complied with and the repair provisions of the following paragraph have not been triggered, the City agrees that it will not institute civil, criminal action, or administrative action to bring about correction of the defect beyond the notice .of violation and agreed upon civil. penalty above referenced. Nothing herein shall limit the discretion of the City to exercise its full criminal and civil enforcement authority with respect to any other condition or defect on the property, known or unknown, whether.now existing or arising in the future.. .7. Repair of Defective Condition. The Property Owner on behalf of himself, .his heirs, successors, and assigns including future owners of the property, agrees to repair the noted condition in conjunction with any of the following construction activities on the site; 7.1. Future Construction or Reconstruction of the Driveway. In the event that any portion of the driveway on the Subject Site is constructed or reconstructed, the grade of the driveway shall be brought within the twenty percent (20%) maximum stipulated by City Code as a part of said construction or reconstruction. The term construction or reconstruction does not include minor repairs to the driveway such as fixing cracks caused by settlement, excess loads, etc. 7.2. Remodel or Reconstruction of the Home. In the.event that any repair, remodel, or reconstruction of the home located on the subject site is initiated and the value of said repair exceeds twenty-five percent (25%) of the value (. at the time of repair, remodel,. or reconstruction) of the structure, whether or not the proposed improvement, reconstruction; or remodel of the dwelling involves the driveway, the above noted defect in the driveway shall be corrected as a part of said remodel or reconstruction. For purposes of this subparagraph, if the percentage of value cannot be determined in accordance with the value tables established by the Uniform Building Code such relative values shall be determined by appraisal by an appraiser jointly selected by the parties. 7.3. Corrections. All such corrections shall be undertaken in conformance with applicable provisions of the City Code and the State Building Code, provided, however, that in the event that the City Code shall hereafter be amended to permit driveways in excess of twenty percent (20%), Property Owners shall be free to exercise any legal remedy available to it to obtain approval of such driveway grade. Upon such approval, this agreement shall terminate and be at an end. Upon correction of the defect in the driveway by reconstruction of the defective grade, this agreement may be terminated by the filing of a copy of the final building permit noting correction of the grade at the cost of the Property owner with the Snohomish County Auditor. V v0(_ 279OpArc2n_qn, 8.: Specific Enforcement. In addition to any other remedies which may be available to either party, the parties stipulate and agree that a noted defect involves the property and entails a risk, however, minimal, to members. of the public, and therefore the terms of this agreement shall be specifically enforceable by either party. 9. Sole Agreement, Merger: This is the sole agreement between the parties. Any other agreement, written or oral, is deemed merged with the provisions of this agreement and extinguished by the execution thereof. This agreement shall not be amended except in writing with the express written consent of the parties hereto. DATED this -day of , 1993. CITY OF EDMONDS PROPERTY OWNERS Mayor M. H 1 Gordon Gogert ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED Rhonda Mar , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM 04�4�-.�v Scott Sn r City Attorney . ACKNOWLEDGMENT Continental SavinZs Bank Mortgagor < Frank L. Barczewski, Vice President va. 27.90 POP 2.1.11 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this 6M day of /k2 1993, before me personally appeared Gordon Gogert, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing Notice of Violation and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN -'WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed by official seal, the day. and 'year first above written. NOTARY PUIKLft in aYd_ for the State of Washington, residin at A— Aq-6/7.1 My commissioexpires: q //-95- STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this &41 day of keatd� , 1 1993, before me personally appeared Novleen Gogert, to me known to be tKe individual described in and who executed the foregoing Notice of Violation and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havie hereto set my hand and affixed by official seal &�ddyiand y6r first above written. NOTARY PAOC in dKd for the State of Washington, residing at Arli t I, q 710 10 My Commission plres: q j 79 Opnc 2332 WEST COAST S TRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. PO BOX 5629 EVERETT, WA 98206-5629 Date: September 3, 2003 To: Northwest Sunrooms PO Box 1332 Kent, WA 98035 Attn: Gary Davis Subject: Nguyen Sunroom 16340 75t' PL W. Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Mr. Davis: PHONE: (425) 347-8998 • FAX: (425) 347-8966 EMAIL@WCSE.NET At your request WCSE has reviewed the referenced project to determine the implications of adding an approximate 8'x12' sunroom on the upper deck of the existing residence. It is our understanding the residence is located within the Meadowdale landslide complex, and as such the native soils are prone to movement. Based on the as -built foundation plan located in the City Edmonds Building Department, and a letter of pile placement verification by Cascade Geotechnical, there are fifty-six (56) 18-inch diameter auger cast piles supporting the existing residence and existing decks. The geotechnical report by Cascade Geotechnical dated January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G gives an allowable bearing load of twenty (20) tons, and a lateral load of five (5) tons per pile. Within the footprint of the proposed sunroom there are six (6) auger cast piles shown on the foundation plan that would aid in the support of the new sunroom. Based on the allowable loads of the piles and the relative minimal weight of the proposed sunroom, it is our opinion the existing foundation is adequate to support the additional loads imposed on the foundations from the sunroom. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please give us a call. Thank you, Travis McCandless, P.E. Engineer 7' 3 03 c o WA P H � u �p 3899� _TONAL �� EXPIRES 4 / 13 / 2005 RECEIVED 9 2003 STREET FILE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS <,A 1 Y OF EDM®N+- S BARBARA FAHEY -R� 121 STH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Ih 90 �9 Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant c.18 October 23., 1997 Son Van Nguyen Kim D Tran 16340 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 Re: Home Owners Insurance Policy for Meadowdale Landslide Area It has been brought to our attention that you are the new owners at the above address. Hopefully the previous owners informed you that the property is located in a Designated Earth Subsidence Landslide Area and all development is regulated by city ordinance 2661. A. copy is enclosed for your convenience. One special requirement of this ordinance is to post and maintain a general public liability homeowners insurance policy in the amount of one million dollars which shall run not more than 10 years after occupancy of the structure has been granted. The subject residence was granted occupancy on 9/16/93 and current owners would be required to maintain this policy until the year 2003. Enclosed for your convenience is a sample of the Certificate of Insurance that is required. You should submit this form to your insurance agent as soon as possible. Your agent may call us directly if there are any questions. We expect to receive this form no later than November 14, 1997. Please contact me at 771-0220 if you have any questions regarding this insurance requirement. Thank you, �7 '1 Viv Myers l�f r \ ® Incorporated August 11, 1890 \� Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan i' CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering June 19,1996 Mr. and Mrs. Gordon Gogert 16406 75th PI W Edmonds, WA 98026 Re: ADDRESS CHANGE 11DDRE CH1q1-v-6)6 The City has received your request for an address change at your single family residence due to an addressing error. The Building Official and the Fire Marshall have concurred that the address should be changed to bring it into conformance with the addressing policies of the City. Therefore, approval has been given to change: 16406 75th PI W to 16340 75th PI W The City will notify all applicable City departments of the change. It will be your responsibility to notify all others, including the Post Office. You have thirty days to post new address numbers. Thank you for bringing this addressing discrepancy to our attention. Sharon Nolan Permit Coordinator CC. Fire Police Public Works Utility Billing Address Files;✓ Street Files Engineering Building Official ADDRESS.DOC/TEMPBLDG 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 89p_101�- * STREET FILE 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation . Engineering July 7, 1993 Mr. Tom Gogert Gogert & Sons Construction 16606 52nd Avenue West Stanwood, Washington 982292 RE: 16406 75th Place West LAURA M. HALL MAYOR It has come to the attention of the Building Division that the subject residence is in the process of being occupied. Please be advised, Section 305 of the Uniform Building Code, (UBC) prohibits the occupancy of buildings without final approval by the Building Official. As you have been previously notified this residence may not be occupied until the following items have been satisfied or resolved: 1. A one million dollar insurance policy is required to be posted by the owner. 2. The drainage deficiency must be corrected. 3. The driveway slope exceeds the percentage permitted by City code. Violations of the UBC may be pursued through the City's civil penalties process whereby fines of up to $5,000.00 per day may be imposed for each day the violation exists. As the owner of record, you are hereby notified that occupancy of the residence without final approval is a violation of the Building Code and City Ordinance #2661. Enforcement of these codes shall be pursued within 15 days date of this letter unless all outstanding issues are resolved to the satisfaction of the Building and Engineering Departments. If you have any questions please contact the Building Division at 771-0220. Thank you, (eannine L. Graf Acting Building Official cc: City Engineer • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 89p _ Io4 CITY OF EDSMONDS FILE* 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering LAURA M. HALL MAYOR June 10, 1993 i �- f o /l /it3 Tom Gogert 16606 - 52nd Ave. W. Stanwood, WA 98292 Re: Driveway slope violation at=16'406 - 75th PI%W:AEdmonds Dear Mr. Gogert, It has been brought to our attention that a portion of the driveway at the subject address exceeds the maximum slope of 20% allowed by the City Development Code, Section 18.80.060D, and was verified by City staff and that portion exceeding 20% is in the first 20 feet of the driveway. According to the approved drawings, the slope was not going to exceed 14%, but was installed from 12.7% to 21%. It is the responsibility of the contractor to see that all work conforms to current codes and any changes to the approved plans should be brought to the attention of the inspector, which did not occur. Even though a final engineering inspection was done by the Engineering Division, the portion of the driveway that exceeds 20% must be reduced to conform with the City Code. In addition, since portions of the driveway exceeds 14%, you need to request, in writing, a driveway slope waiver. The Building Division has been notified about the above subject and, according to the Acting Building Official, no certificate of occupancy will be issued until the the driveway exceeding 20% is corrected. If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman, 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer ALC/RJA/sdt c: Jeannine Graf, Acting Building Official GOGERT.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890 _ 194 0 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Wor!cs - Planning - Parks and Recreation • Engineering MWF% FILE December 19, 1991 Tom Gogert Gogert & Sons Construction Co. 16606 - 52nd Ave. W. Stanwood, WA 98292 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR Mailed 12/20/91 Re: Reinstallation of storm drainage manhole on 164th St. S.W. at 16406 - 75th P1. W. (my letter of November 8, 1991) Dear Tom, PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR On November 8, 1991, I wrote asking what your plans were for reinstalling the subject manhole and to -date, have had no response. It is important the manhole be installed before the winter rains arrive, so please provide us with the pertinent information previously requested. If you have any questions, please call Jim Walker at 771-3202, extension 281. Sincerely, ADDISON L. CHRISMAN IV Engineering Inspector ALC/sdt GOGERT/TXTST530 �L �'- Alberts • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan f 890.199 STREET Mailed 11/12/91 CITY OF E D M O N D S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN 250 - 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Wor!cs • Planning • Parks and Recreation •. Engineering DIRECTOR November 8, 1991 Tom Gogert Gogert & Sons Construction Co. 16606 52nd Avenue West Stanwood, Wa 98292 RE: REINSTALLATION OF CATCH BASIN ON 164TH STREET S.W. 16406 MTH PLACE WEST 7-S f h Dear Tom: During the foundation excavation phase of your construction, on the subject address, you removed a Type II storm catch basin to prevent damage to the existing storm drainage system. You and I have discussed locations for the reinstallation of the Type II catch basin. To date, you have not provided the City with the location nor time frame for installation. Please provide us your time frame, location, and how you are going.to tie the exposed 18" CMP into the catch basin. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Addison L. Chrisman IV Engineering Inspector ALC/dm GOGERT/TXTForms Bok4 b A er s • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 -r. COMMUNITY SERVICES Inc. 1890 lvl390 F5-��4LW 51-MV4 AQrc411�46Z- /�07Z21 .. �. ^�� -a"� � .. '�°.�'� �y +, j �,.t, '�7 (•,!'r yr �- e �`+;•1. "pi.e.. � o`t ,6_.1�y�J,+.'j1 t;v"•�• -i� .��''j(=�'idt J �;�•h i.;+j �\':',L°M1: a?..fit^ .�,." .: t' �.r--�g�'Y" ",.•rtr�� STREET FILE (E) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 727 APPROVING THE HOUSEKEEPING REVISIONS TO THE WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY (F) FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY ASSOCIATED SAND AND GRAVEL ON THE SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT PAVING PROJECT AND SETTING THE 30-DAY RETAINAGE PERIOD .t)(G) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN -FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM NICK STEMM V AND NANCY DENSON AT 19017 SOUNDVIEW PLACE (H) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN -FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM GOGERT & V. SONS, INC., AT 16406 75TH PL W. (1) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR FIVE-FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM PHILIP J ZEVENBERGEN AT 9121 BOWDOIN WAY {, (K) APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WITH ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. FOR MAPPING OF SR 99 FOR 1992 WATER PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ($1,600.00) ,ysp (L) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT WITH ESCA ylE (M AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE FROM FUND 125 REPLACEMENT PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT I FROM BIG TOY ($2,464.00) AND QUALITY INDUSTRIES ($380.00). APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 4, 1991 AND NOVEMBER _12, 1991 (ITEM (B) ON CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Palmer referenced the minutes of November 4th and a memo from the City Clerk regarding a request for a correction from Councilmember Hertrich. Councilmember Palmer said he will not vote for that correction, as it is his feeling the comments were made facetiously, and stated the City Clerk and Minute Taker recognized that fact also. Councilmember Palmer stated Council President Wilson is a designated member of the Edmonds Visitors Bureau, and as such, is free to speak with that board. COUNCILMEMBER PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 4 AND NOVEMBER 12 AS SUBMITTED, AND NOT ADOPT THE CHANGES AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY CLERK AT THE DIRECTION OF COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH MOTION CARRIED. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR THE MASTER PLAN FOR SOUTHWEST COUNTY PARK ($10 000). (Item (D) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Nordquist noted that documentation provided by Arvilla Ohlde, Parks and Recreation Manager, stated the City/County selection committee selected the firm of Nakano Dennis Landscape. Councilmember Nordquist noted the City also has a consultant selection committee, and wanted to clarify for the record that this committee was not involved in this particular selection, rather it was the City's Planning Board. Councilmember Palmer asked Ms. Ohlde about Section 4.3 on page 5 of the agenda memo, "Deliverables". Ms. Ohlde said that element was left in when the City presented the interlocal agreement. Mr. Ohlde said a standard has always existed that the City ask for one hard copy and one reproducible copy. Ms. Ohlde said she asked the County as to what they had agreed to on the contract with Nakano Dennis, and they had left out a deliverable element of that product, because they wanted to stay within the $20,000, from the City and County, as their budget limit. Ms. Ohlde suggested leaving the item of "Deliverables" out of this EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 November 19, 1991 current interlocal with the County, because the City is simply entering Into an agreement to work together as two units of government. Councilmember Palmer referenced paragraph 4.1, page 4 and requested the insertion of "and County" after "City" so that both entities are bound by the provision. Councilmember Palmer also requested the following information be added to the first page under "Purpose": 'The City and County have intended the park be developed for passive recreational uses". COUNCILMEMBER PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO APPROVE ITEM (D) WITH THE ADDITION OF THE CORRECTIONS AS NOTED. Under discussion, Councilmember Kasper asked Ms. Ohlde where she got the idea the County purchased the park with IAC funds, and Ms. Ohlde said the information is contained in the files that have letters and the application. Ms. Ohlde said it was purchased from the University of Washington with matching monies from the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation. Councilmember Kasper said it was his understanding it was purchased by a land swap. Ms. Ohlde said she would look into the matter and respond back to the Council. MOTION CARRIED. `AT 7632,230TH ST:!S* �1`' T : M J .Qbj THE QQNSENT kffirj ` Councilmember Nordquist suggested that from here on forward, the Council receive a vicinity map, giving the Council a better idea of the location of the Quit Claim. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON TO MOVE THIS ITEM FORWARD TO THE NOVEMBER 26TH CONSENT AGENDA IN ORDER TO INCLUDE A VICINITY MAP. MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Hertrich noted that Items (G) (H) and (1) on the Consent Agenda are also Quit Claims and they should also require vicinity maps. Councilmember Hertrich suggested moving these items forward as well. COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PALMER, TO RECONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA, AND REMOVE ITEMS (G), (H) AND (1) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE PURPOSE OF MOVING THEM AHEAD TO THE CONSENT AGENDA ON NOVEMBER 26TH IN ORDER TO INCLUDE A VICINITY MAP FOR EACH QUIT CLAIM. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE t'l Gary Fiske, 8017 180th PI. S.W., Edmonds, thanked the City Council and Mayor for including the word "Passive" in relation to the Master Plan for the Southwest County Park. Mr. Fiske said this was a concern of the neighbors surrounding the park, and everyone is a lot more comfortable knowing the park was will $.y remain passive. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 November 19, 1991 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL ' �,'- •_ AGENDA MEMO ---- -—1--_,, •Item number: STREET FILE' Originator: Robert J. Alberts For Action: x For Information: SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM GOGERT & SONS, INC. AT 16406 - 75TH PLACE WEST AGENDA TIME: Consent AGENDA DATE: November 26, 1991 EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Copy of Quit Claim Deed 2. Vicinity Map Clearances: Dept./Indiv./Initials ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ADMIN SVCS/FINANCE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING 89r4 �,T. PARKS & RECRENVION PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS FIRE PERSONNEL POLICE COMMITTEE MAYOR COMMENTS: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: $0 BUDGETED: $0 REQUIRED: $0 HISTORY AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: A quit claim deed for the ten foot street dedication is a development requirement from the official street map for possible future road expansion or improvements along 75th Place West. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council accept the quit claim deed for, the ten foot street dedication from Gogert & Sons, Inc. COUNCIL ACTION: GOGERT/TXTAGNDA G�-�-ovc� i��a-b /9/ 'iuneer Pational Title Insurance Company WAGHINGTON TITLE DIVISION • .d for Record at Request of CITY OF EDMONDS 1 250-5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA9807U— arvi"Ve QIWPS THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECOED(CS USE. Rrt l•,i ,. *91 MI 14 All :41 SNOHOMtSI+000N1 wr,I�H OEPUT�--_._... GiC-GlL,�� 7 roar LZ6 It Quit Claim Deed NO EXCISE TAX THE GRANTOR Gogert & Sons, .Inc. REQUIRED for and in consideration of $ N/A JUN 141991 convey and quit claim to City Of Edmonds la Deputy the following described real estate, situated In the County of Snohomish State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: The Easterly t.ten-(60.00) feet of the following described property: Lot 10, Block 60, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH, According to ''''• plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, •Page 38, records of said county; Except that portion thereof lying North of certain fence as described in decree entered May 3, 1929 in Snohomish County Court Case No." 26959 entitled Ruddies vs. Bell. Situate in County of Snohomish, State of Washington., together with the right to make all necessary cut or fill slopes on the land Of grantor's Adjacent to the above -described real property in connection with the construction, maintenance or improvement of the above -described real property for purposes of a public roadway. Dated this lZ7— day of J011w STATE OF I (aaAL) . �ounty of On this lr_�r day of A. D. 199, before me, the under 'signed, a Notary Public in and for a State of duly commissions, and sworn personally appeared O and to me mown to be the the corporation that executed tart'.' act and deed of saidlpC , .-VIZ, corporation. I_ WITNESS my 91061 respectively, of I 0 •egoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volun- 'IL r the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that_!he 7., cc a the said instrument and that the sea] affixed is the corporate seal of said y VOL. 2 4 51 PAGE 10 8 3 mm o affi ay d year in th' c to above written. I ♦ Oft �Al V , I•�tP�j ff� No ary Public in and for. the S e of re.iding Corporation. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company. Form L 19) < r 3 ' 4 a, 1f SUBJECT PROPERTY EXHIBIT A --`"'�,a,'ria"°".�p'°Wksi..tia:l�%ra:.lGpuYlatisaa.Y�`.�L`�tre4??�R•n-.ua.:.. .. Jnnm�'v.Cmcb+�`r'w.i�:;B.G�li3n..Pk:4: n er�w�4n79ix�.wf-a�i?.,.......,.h�.x+salucs..�.�e.�n'Fr:,E.ia,B .. - • TOMINUTES SUBJECT STREET FILE TO DECEMBER 10APPROVAL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 26, 1991 The meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Larry Naughten at the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main Street. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT Larry S. Naughten, Mayor Jack Wilson, Council President Steve Dwyer, Councilmember Roger Hertrich, Councilmember Jo -Anne Jaech, Councilmember Bill Kasper, Councilmember John Nordquist, Councilmember Jeff Palmer, Councilmember Amanda Foote, Student Representative Councilmember Dwyer arrived at 7:05 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA STAFF Art Housler, Admin. Serv. Director Buzz Buzalsky, Fire Chief Noel Miller, Public Works Supt. Bob Alberts, City Engineer Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dan Prinz, Police Chief Peter Hahn, Comm. Serv. Director Scott Snyder, City Attorney Barb Mehlert, Recorder COUNCILMEMBER PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO ADD ITEM (J) TO THE CONSENT AGENDA: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION 728 TO STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE AMANDA FOOTE. MOTION CARRIED. Item (E) was removed from the Consent Agenda. COUCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda include the following: (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19, 1991 (C) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM STEVEN E. GREENBAUM ($269.44) (D) AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE LANIER ADVOCATE IV RECORDING SYSTEM FROM STATE CONTRACT FOR PLAZA MEETING ROOM ($6,139.27) P?'(F) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN -FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM NICK STEMM AND ✓ "NANCY DENSON AT 19017 SOUNDVIEW PLACE (CONTD FROM NOV. 19, 1991) (G) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN -FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM GOGERT & SONS, INC. AT 16406 75TH PL W. (CONTD FROM NOV. 19, 1991) G. (H) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR FIVE-FOOT STREET. DEDICATION FROM PHILIP ,/ ZEVENBERGEN AT 9121 BOWDOIN WAY (CONTD FROM NOV. 19, 1991) (1) ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN -FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM P & L ENTERPRISES ✓ Q,V AT 7632 230TH ST. S.W. (CON -ID FROM NOV. 19, 1991) (J) APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 728 OF COMMENDATION TO STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE AMANDA _ tl FOOTE. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL i AGENDA MEMO Item number: STREET FILE Originator: Robert J. Alberts For Action: x For Information: SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR TEN FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM GOGERT & SONS, INC. AT 16406 - 75TH PLACE WEST AGENDA TIME: Consent AGENDA DATE: November 19, 1991 EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Copy of Quit Claim Deed Clearances: Dept./Indiv./Initials ------------------ ------------------ ADMIN SVCS/FINANCE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING PARKS & RECREAT ON PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS FIRE PERSONNEL POLICE COMMITTEE MAYOR COMMENTS: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: $0 BUDGETED: $0 REQUIRED: $0 HISTORY AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: A quit claim deed for the ten foot street dedication is a development requirement from the official street map for possible future road expansion or improvements along 75th Place West. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council accept the quit claim deed for the ten foot street dedication from Gogert & Sons, Inc. COUNCIL ACTION: GOGERT/TXTAGNDA `i D c�it aaJ� RNtNV[ STAMPS 0THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE: • i6neer National Title Insurance Company WASHINGTON TITLa DIVISION ed for Record at Request of ^ • n r(Lt_.,/. is _ 'J CITY OF EDMONDS '91 :LV 14 A11 :41 DEAN i'. 1;;:!' [j1 250-5th Ave:. N. 5N0H0Mt5t�COUNIW,_? Edmonds, WA 98 DEPUTY J , t� rwtr Lae n (quit Claim Deed P* NO EXCISE TAX THE GRANTOR Gogert & Sons, .Inc. REQUIRED 8jo s-' for and in consideration of N/A JUN 141991 convey and quit claim to City of Edmonds KIR i Sn kunish Cuuuty T SUf:I s Deputy the following described real estate, situated In the County of Snohomish State of Washington including any interest therein which grantormayhereafter acquire: The Easterlyt.ben'(40.00) Peet of the following described property: Lot 10, Block 60, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH, According to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of said county; Except that portion thereof lying North of certain fence as described in decree entered May 3, 1929 in Snohomish County Court Case No.' 26959 entitled Ruddies vs. Bell. Situate in County of Snobomish, State of Washington. together with the right to -make all necessary cut or fill slopes on the land of grantor's Adjacent to the above -described real property in connection with the constructiorl, maintenance or improvement of the above -described real property for purposes of a public roadway. Dated this day of jode (STATE OF 1tY46 f7 - Aunty of On this day of A. D. 19V, before me, the under signed, a Notary Public in and for a State of duly commissions. and sworn personally appeared and l to me own to be th President a ecretary, respectively, of 1 0 the corporation that executed the regoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and v0 lun- taryact and deed of said 19�a r the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that_?ie f r• • . �cec a the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IRy vot. 2 4 51 PAGE 10 a 3 WITNESS my h >�;�� ;%a Cf o affi ay d year in th" c to above written. •v l Pu � z * �• dot/ ,ti�f .gyp f� ��„: a• Pej�) No ary Public in and for the S e of 1 � � 14,04 residing at� Ei.YY1C/ (f4coy�daie y Corporation. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company. Form L 29) r • Vktff FILE MEMORANDUM REr, EIVED DATE: September 13, 1990 SEP 13140 TO: Bobby Mills, Public Works Director rijULIC WORKS FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinat SUBJECT: SF Residence Gogert 16406 75th Place West Please conduct a site inspection to determine the restoration cost for damage of City right-of-way, utilities, etc. if this site should slide during construction. Sewer $ Water $ �, Storm Drainage $9� coo Streets $ iB poo Sidewalks $ `Undeveloped Right -of -Way $ Other Utilities $ Miscellaneous $ TOTAL $ 6,6 000 N fjV 7 1990 ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE UNIT UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK ISSUE QTY COST TOTAL Sax � s4/ Z7'i �4 6640 AWuyV�/g~ Brag+ DIAM; 2463 35 do 5t- �1Z ,iJ 26 3 4.0 1/ 320 5AV*Z c u.° A t3 R260 PA Vwow r Z 2 4#m e3 3 v 24 110 oV c4-ry in �1 �rZc�•cm�z .. 5735 STREET FILE MEMORANDUM July.26, 1990 TO: Building Division FROM: Gordie Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: PLAN CHECK NO. 121, 16406 - 75TH PL. W. This.is the first plan I have reviewed with a driveway that approaches the upper limit of 140. In order to prevent a future problem, when the Building Inspector does a footing inspection, I would like to be informed so that we can determine if the final garage slab to the street grade will require a waiver for the driveway slope. The waiver can then be processed while construction is in progress, rather than delaying the final. Thank you for your cooperation. GCH/sdt r•� PLNCK121/TXTST530 LANDAU A ASSOCIATES, INC. Geoenvironmental Engineering and Technologies City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 • Attention: Mr. Richard R. Mumma RE: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW PROPOSED RESIDENCE AT 16405 75th PLACE WEST MEADOWDALE AREA EDMONDS, WASHINGTON U July 20,1990 This letter contains our comments concerning a preliminary geotechnical review of plans and other documents concerning the above -noted proposed residence. A full listing of documents .is contained in Attachment 1. Our rev-iew was performed using Edmonds City Ordinance 2661 as the standard for comparison. The January 8,1990 geotechnical report prepared by Cascade Geotechnical, Inc. (Cascade) meets the technical requirements of City Ordinance 2661, and provides recommendations that appear to be in general accordance with standard geotechnical engineering practice. However, we have several comments and concerns regarding this project, particularly with regard to the interpretation of the geotechnical report, and subsequent declarations provided by the involved design professionals. Our comments and concerns are summarized as follows: • Neither the Grading Plan nor the Project Plans provide art accurate represen- tation of final site grades. For example, the southwest corner of the residence will require a 2-1/2 foot cut to match interior finished floor elevation. and an additional 5-foot cut to match the deck landing area. Cut slopes, rockeries, or retaining walls to accommodate these elevations differentials are not shown on the plans. This is also true along the north wall, where an apparent 2-3 foot differential exists. The lead design professional (Structural Design Associates, Inc.) should determine the appropriate way to handle these grade changes. • The volume of cut shown on the Grading Plan translates into approximately 150 cubic yards. Our crude estimate indicates that in excess of 300 cubic yards of cut will be required just for the basement. Once the need for additional retaining structures has been assessed, the total cut volume should be recalculated, and a determination made as to the need for a conditional use permit. P.O. BOX 1029 • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020-1029 • (206)778-0907 • FAX (206)778-6409 • Ordinance 2661 requires that the site's topographic map show the first floor and footing elevations for adjacent structures. This information was not provided for the existence residence to the north. Because substantial grading will not be performed in this area, it does not appear that this information is critical. • An unnumbered, untitled, undated, and unstamped plan is included with the Project Plans as (assumed) Sheet No. 5. This sheet shows footing details that are significantly out of compliance with recommendations provided by Cascade, and are in conflict with other details included in the project plans. Inconsistencies must be corrected or properly explained. • Cascade recommends pile support for the proposed residence, including both the garage and basement retaining walls. As shown, the garage wall is pile supported. However, the proposed basement wall is shown on conventional foundations. The drawings should be revised to reflect the geotechnical engineers' recommendations. • Cascade's January 30,1990 addendum addresses the proposed retaining walls. Their letter states that: 1) the walls should be backfilled with free -draining material, 2) the basement slab should be placed on a capillary break, and 3) the basement retaining wall should be placed into "native soil." These recom- mendations have not been incorporated into the Project Plans. • The minimum pile lengths noted in Cascade's report are 10 and 16 feet for the interior retaining wall and east and west sides of the residence, respectively. Our interpretation of the data provided by Cascade suggests -that these numbers are optimistic, and that deeper pilings may be required, especially along the east side of the garage. • A Detail showing the proposed pier foundation (Cross -Section 3) indicates that the pilings are to extend 5 feet into native soil. Because "native soil" is present from the ground surface downward (no fill noted on logs), it is reasonable to expect that a contractor would interpret this note literally, that is, piles would not exceed 5 feet in length. This conflicts with Cascade's recommendations, and a note at the top of the plan concerning pile lengths. • Sheet 4 of the Project Plans (Section A -A) shows the proposed residence founded on shallow foundations. This cross section should be modified to show the anticipated depth to the bearing stratum, and note that pile support will be necessary to reach that proposed minimum depth. In summary, it appears that the recommendations provided by Cascade meet the requirements of Ordinance 2661. However, the project plans do not accurately reflect Cascade's conclusions and recommendations. Therefore, it is recommended that the submitted documents be returned to the applicant for revisions and re -review by the involved design professionals. Additionally, the declarations that have been provided should be updated to reflect revisions to 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. the Project Plans and documents. Landau Associates did not review the structural calculations provided by Structural Design Associates, Inc. Please call if you have questions, or if resubmitted documents need additional review. WDE/jlg Attachment No. 74-16.10 3 copies submitted EDM0MX\G0GEW.M Very truly yours, LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By: William D. Evans, CPG Project Manager 3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. ATTACHMENT 1 LIST OF SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS 1604 75th Place West • Sheets 1-8 of Project Plans, Structural Design Associates, Inc., dated January 1990. • Plan 3332, showing Pier Foundation Design, Structural Design Associates, Inc., dated January 22, 1990. • Plot Plan with Grading and Storm Water Drainage, Structural Design Associ- ates, Inc., dated March 29, 1990. • Structural Calculations, Structural Design Associates, Inc., dated January 18 and March 23, 1990. • Structural Declaration, Structural Design Associates, Inc., dated April 19,1990. • Geotechnical. Report, Cascade Geotechnical, Inc., dated January 8, 1990. • Addendum to Geotechnical Report, Cascade Geotechnical, Inc., dated January 30, 1990. • Geotechnical Declaration, Cascade Geotechnical,.Inc., dated April 17, 1990. • Topographic Survey Map, Western Surveyors, Inc., dated October 10, 1989. • Environmental Checklist, signed by Thomas Gogert, dated May 14, 1990. • Owner declaration, Gogert and Sons, Inc., dated May 8, 1990. 4 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G MAY 1419'90 '.ptRMIT, OEM Gogert and Sons, Inc. 16606 52nd Avenue N.W. Stanwood, Washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Addendum to Geotechnical Report for Gogert Residence 16300 Block 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: At your request, we have completed an addendum to our geotechnical report dated January 8, 1990 regarding the basement retaining wall design. We. have reviewed Plan 3332 of the pier foundation prepared by Structural Design Associates, Inc. dated January 22, 1990. The structural notes regarding pier capacity reflect the design parameters recommended in our soils report. We did not review any of the structural design. No lateral forces for the retaining walls were listed. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended in our soils report may be designed to resist an active lateral force equivalent to a fluid having density of 45 p.c.f. The colluvium and the underlying native soil were assumed to have a passive resistance of 200 and CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Page 2 250 p.c.f., respectively. The latter parameter was calculated separately from the design parameters provided in our soils report and was verbally communicated to SDA, Inc. on January 22, 1990. The recommendations provided in our soils report for this site have been incorporated into the proposed foundation design. The following exceptions are outlined below. The retaining walls proposed for the garage front and the east side of the basement should be backfilled with a free draining material as specified in our soils report. We recommend that the basement slab -on -.grade be placed on a capillary break as specified in -our soils report. As shown on Figure 2 on the provided plan, the retaining wall lug is shown to penetrate one (1) foot into the native soil. No subgrade is indicated for the four and one-half (4 1/2) foot long toe. We recommend that the entire wall foundation be seated into native soil. We estimate that the native soil is approximately a foot below the toe. We should observe the excavation for the wall foundation to verify that it is founded on the native soil. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-326 Page 3 We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, [�(`"`'�t L/ V•OP •P• / �� CASCAD EOTECHNIL�° d L� 0. �. ge am Principal Engineer P. L� 1/u J son Olsson Geologist JO:mrm 0 TO: Permit Coordinator, Building Division FROM: Gordie Hyde, Engineering Coordinator J ADDRESS: 4-0(" - 51�-(' P DATE: q 1ZI/50 OWNER: PLAN CK# / Z / After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: 4. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS.......... 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. (ECC 5.30.110) WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS..10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. 14. A separate Right -of -Way Construction Permit is required for all work on City property. (ECDC 18.60) Connection to City water system required. Separate water meter charge required. (ECDC 7.30) Connection to City sanitary sewer system required; obtain separate permit. LID # Z /0 Fees paid: Yes ✓ No Charge $ (ECDC 18.10) �. Water and sewer lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) �. Driveways must be paved a minimum of 20 feet back from City right-of-way; separate permit required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) �/. Driveway slope not to exceed 14% without waiver. Waiver granted to (ECDC 18.80.060D) �8. Back water valve required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. (ECC 7.20) Builder/Owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 18.30.030D) 10. No burning of construction refuse without permit from Fire Department. -11. Street to be kept clean of debris, dirt, mud, and construction materials. Contractor responsible for dust control. (ECDC 18.30) Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of permit. '12. Inspection required on drainage system, catch basin installation, driveways, and sidewalks. A final engineering inspection is required prior to the Building Division granting occupancy. (ECDC 18.30, 19.80), J5 -,aetJcz// c%� �P � �013. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to property. If intersection is involved, installation of. wheelchair access may be required. Permittee to meet with Engineering staff to determine extent of repair prior to issuance of permit. c (ECDC 18.90) July 11, 1990 ENG/REV/TXTFORMS STREET RLE w Building Permit Application Review Page 2 Vf4. Underground wiring required on all new construction. Also, if the proposed addition, alteration or repairs exceeds 50% of the total assessed valuation of the existing structure. (ECDC 18.05.010) ✓15. No work shall be done within 15 feet of streams or 10 feet from any closed drainage facility. 16. � d/ ,PW;:) 7/90 ENG/REV/TXTFORMS PRWtCr NAME' 'S APPLICATION RECEIP SIr1GLE FAMILY/MULTIPL C I 'One E/CObYlEIiCIAL EMU , r / rr . SETBACKS CHDCKED Plann q �.; w,.a �. vARZAtxe/sETar+cK'Aw... USF. PERMIT " ✓r/ it °i % : rr/trr :% /ri r °r /r� CONDITIONAL NO FS1VI °RO�A�SflAI FEATURE Y�° ?^ r/r/ r ' PlSFSS SIAPE & VEHICLEJVMS� --------" DRAINAGE PLAN (On` Site STREET FILE IEXJIL DESCRIPTION VFJtIFICATION,� 111111 - a QUIT CLAIM/DEDICATIONS'"�J/ mf EASEMENT — PUBLIC/PRIVATE '/// //// CALLiJLATE SLF]ER CGNtQECTICN IF NO LIDS "� y'_ /1// l/ // // /llll / ////l/ ^y 12': < /Y /// h,. f" / /// /" 13 FIAT/SUBDIVISION IREMENTS RIGIrrOF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RE(�D � ,;' tt / // / / / // ///////// > 14' // / / / f / BOND READ FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SOILS CONDITIONS & GROUND,., fit! s WATER FIELD CHECKEDHIM STREET' PAVING REQUIRED144444141 CURB AND GUTTI R pjpwiRED ri Yak 19't SIDEWALK IRED � r.;` % // / / �°��' �,�,�, / CURS CUT FOR DRIVEWAY ,. �r�?*A, � �.�, / / ._r A / STREET NAME SIGN . OTRER SIGNINGOf SIDEY SEWER AVAILABILITY`,''s'" 3 ff r t 1I'/ EXISTING WATER MAIN &I2E{ WATER METELt SIZE,'—; 'sr� R / a `. // . ff %/fr/ 26i SERVICE LINE SIZE,ti» HYDRANT REQUIRED `� z4 {;,�`µg //r /r// /// * / 28 HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING. °*" j' / 29 CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION � / �' w ;' // // // /////// 30 WATER METER CfLARGEREQD / / 31 . crna r nac. 147aTX!ARFYY)-.SPRINiQ$Z &�". .. Mlhr ,-- City of Edmond .ET I F-WAY CONSTR CTION R , &?d 12 g%S% PERMIT . Permit Number:%2-011 Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 16+06 -7 S T H P L W 1 _*ftA0WMr O B. Type of Work (be specific): gjsTAt_L utJDER(3 RouND FALL %Tt�S cpQ f_-J6TiNG 8 9 0 " 1 9 po%�E, Q>owk utJOL-iL 5IVA:Q--r, To."C 1 1N R►W 4 946TC2Ie sop. New 40mc- C. Contractor: P U Contact: MCV (LT M ptPT 1 Mailing Address: '.2Ipl$ U.S. iiwl q'i Phone: (.o-70 - 32-01. State License #: £D W A 9160Z 6 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): r E. ' ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family �ngle Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: CIaR lS tAA n/ INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes 0460 G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN a INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may -be- fade, against1the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employ- 11 ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defennsse costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND M ) FOR A PERIAP OF ONE R FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEG770N AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ES77MATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED. FOR ISSUANCE TO THE AP,,PUCANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Department- 771.-3202,. Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. A,(; I z z • `72. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be, patched with asphalt or City approved .material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection pure es. t d Signature: Date: 1 — ' - -1-Z . (Contractor yr.Aggent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ........ _.. .._... .............. FOR CITY USE ONLY Qu APPROVED BY r- / a ;' - u '.... R1aHT. OF. WAY. DEPQSif:x✓i�-i, TIME AUTHORIZED VOII).AFTER �7 DAYS.: DISRUPTION: FEE/FUND 111 k J NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Engrg. Div. 091 FIELD INSPECTION AS (Fund I I I - Route copy 'to Street Dept.) Comments: 7", Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES. ❑ NO. Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY:. Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 -..� .:.. • �pRD otZC-. •Ff' M 1476 grTymmEmmmm PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY REV. 7/87 LOCATION �(i 4-Q(7 -75TH PL _. S0 CO AREA POLE NO. K) W 1/4 S B T -2-7 R 4- DATE 1 - 13- Ct Z W.O. NO. 3Z REASON FOR WORK SC.0 t-AU S\%(- FoP_ ENGINEER MAI-TI►J DWG. N0. D5SZ4Z C7 0(L,_4--9--T 4-1 soN S 1 Q C, _ DRAFTER U.G. NO. (".. A �j _ _ SCALE 1 � = ,-oo DATE WORK COMPLETED [APPROVED DATE PRINTED FOREMAN FEES REQ'D IL YES Cl NO PRIMARY OVERHE D ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL LEO# SECONDARY OVER iEAD BASIC EE $ METER/CONY. POE g PRIMARY UNDERGRO ND ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL BASIC EE $ LEU # SECONDARY UNDERGROUND BASIC FEE $ 4 50 UNDERGROUND PLAT BASIC f EE $ CFT.®$ =$ STREET LIGHTING �FT. ®g _$ WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY ❑ PRIMARY IR SECONADARY MISCELLANEOUS FEES VAULT $ J�_DrAorJD.S PERMIT g 3 C7 -2oo AM? I.S-7 1>61L$ 314 TOTAL DUE $ O 59- DATE PAID RECEIPT# _ NEW SVCE APPLICATION# ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ® EXEMPT ❑ NOT EXEMPT PARA. 18 ITEM C O.H. U.G. COND. KV ADD CKT. FT. PH REM CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. O.H. U.G. COND. KV ADD CKT. FT. PH REM CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ STATE ❑ COUNTY 19 CITY iioMoNbS EASEMENTS ❑ REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED DATE RELEASED FOREIGN CONTACTS ❑ GTNW JPN # ❑ CATV JPN# 19 JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CATV V JOINT BORE GTNW & CATV POLE STENCILIIIG FROM ro TAKE OFF POLE PRE-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ PUD LOCATOR Iff BACKHOE ❑ 19 ONE CALL DATE INDEX IPOLES I PLAT LOGS U-MAP XFMR C-MAP LOCATION MAP PAGE S 3 SUBSTATION , (u1�A00arU0 l� L(� CIRCUIT NO. 12-Ig4-0 PHASE 6oiZo-:- D&ITPt 1 t— � I�biE iA� onV �a� 4 -::s P- z3c,I T. IMST 3" SEC QISLR 00 �-x )ST PO L E C3aQE W(--SZ VNDE(l P-0A0 t&JA,y 30'. Iws'C 3" PQL 0 w a ASP NAI.T T Q b r.iG N .0w W -51' S. D c) -15 T H P L W N o Q-T hA to TO P"PLizli GO9-a6GL INST SC-C. P6DE6T•AL, PT Coe"-- - AS STA•K•C-D Rva 9041a DB Dowa (Z►SC2 To 3 t�,PrcZ �0tj NECTp (LS I IJ 0�SI'41 L. R � S'1 a rz1� R-i ►.� R � r� 2 -}' R.� at H , ►� G cn nn P � �'rN r i/ t ac . So u 1J D ►cbns�® GC I -3 7 O ' ! P-z3b1 X 1 1 �f `•,y a'` � n 12-3`13S Y. �.� T. r � .t ��'l....y.t�r�V�� {'J.�.��,.rY"7 !'IY��h.�Sl��/P Y..�r.'�� JMF.`'�n�•4Wl v '�t.ytl�•r-h• -q..t City of Edmond RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTR CTION 6 9 0. 1 9 4- r01 "R E ET FIELIRMIT Permit Number: S2 — 2,q�. Iss^uee Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 16 .4106 4d,c-s %` B. Type of Work (be specific): & h,+ I %- 06iPiAV`o h�e C. Contractor: S oi4er_Ao%�r Contact: o Iv Mailing Address: .S Phone: State License #:`ip0��l g Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family Single Family ❑ Other a INSPECTOR: L v �,. ' IN PECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes o G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agree�to hold the':Chy of Edmonds hatrnk1Jq f�mri�ijr es, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employ- ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and duorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ES77MA7ED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD, UN71L THE FINAL STREET PAT' H IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT Construction drawing of proposed work required with -permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Departme Work is t(ybe inspected during progress and at completion. n, sm Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. 77.1-0220 Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved -material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. 1 have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspectio V51poses. Signature. G2?.� �J,�c� Date: �" — (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK. SHALL BEGIN PRIOR.TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Engrg. Div. 1991 FIELD INSPECTION NOS (Fund III - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO .Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. h MnWZ:"Z',ir w CITY OF EDMONDS Wit No. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECEIVED RIGHT -OF- WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date 5Ep 18 1991 y iiii► iiiroA oiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. 1 A. •Owner: yn �,� / ENGIVti'd2tor: Z `� /�lyC /V t-`✓ Name 1 Mai ng Address C Mailing Address Z T EE t"F ILE Zip City State Zip -'State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 5 �'� L ` .. /r h .�c. i 1 Type of Work to be Done: I , D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ 'Sub or Plat �R(_ Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ ' Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. 0 Pavement Cut: El Y S N F. •Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of ,working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above that4thisert must be available at the job site for inspectibn p rpses at all times. Signature: Date: ontractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY - Time Authorized: Void afte 3 -days. Special Conditions: PERMIT FEE: Restoration Fee: Receipt No.: �y-1 Fund III Fee: �� Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ RELEASED BY: Date'?:Vg�Ip INSPECTED BY '� Date f 01/'9i �/ NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION AS 1 , (Fund I I I - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: FINAL APPROVAL BY: ❑ YES ❑ NO Date: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 g Z O w F- U O w `CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVEit COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT C� RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SEPI1 8 1991 Issue Date A. •Owner: �� / / Gl l/L- 5 +N ) '&tractor:So, % S l n ew&1 r Crws % Named, Name C r932 n '�T S� Mailing Address M Address City State Zip City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Type of Work to be Di D. • Work in Connection With: ❑. Sub or Plat /111 Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y WAN F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is1required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be.inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. JSignature: G L --- Date: / Owner or Contractor . This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: gr(�,EC__ Time Authorized: Void after J Special Conditions: RELEASED BY: Date k--p g w- PERMIT;FEE: N. Restoration Fee::' Receipt 'Nn.: W:l Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: INSPECTED B^. _ x = $ 10/25� Date x ' NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION AMS (Fund II I - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: FINAL APPROVAL BY: ❑ YES ❑ NO Date: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 � STRE FILE CITY OF EDMON DS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN 250. 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771.3202 MnrOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: - PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR 1B 9 0 . 1.9 °�Ci February 7, 1990 Ed Davis AICP Senior Planner Western Surveyors Inc. 13322 Highway 99 South Everett, WA 98204 SUBJECT: Shoreline Determination for Proposed Residence at 16406 75th Place West Dear Ed, You have requested a determination in regard to the need for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the aforementioned property. If the single.family home is constructed, as you have indicated, further than 200 feet from the high water mark, there should be no requirement for Mr..Gogert to obtain a shoreline permit for this project. If you have further questions, don't hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 1 V6 Mary Lou Block Manager, Planning Division LTRGOGRT/TXTMLB51 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • RECEIVED F E9 0 (3 '990 ,tlE�rEaw tiIIRVFvrll"INC. M, MEF15-1111L Zei CONSULTING ENGINEERS Z N C7 w N O . w _Z o o z w Z Y � O Ix (C to • • • DRAINAGE INSPECTION N Z N ° z a and N F � = w N �W DRIVEWAY INVESTIGATION Q to z (nZiW w in zz e e • for the N w 0 N W N Z Quj GOGERT RESIDENCE D Z W (r9� 0 O N e • e LOCATED AT N Z o s 16407 75th Place West Lu U Z U Meadowdale, Edmonds z o z z f- w O Z � H U 0 D uj Z W Q w UO • e o N Z 0 w W 2q u- ZO.6 J 6 a 5 z x w w Z w O O Q Z F- < h a W m J PROJECT NUMBER 1892 U. o U) 0 6 JULY 1992 O • e 4041 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PARKWAY SOUTHEAST a BELLEVUE a .WASHINGTON 9 98008 a 206 644 1080 Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 1 of 7 pages CLIENT Tom Gogert -16606 52nd Avenue NW Stanwood, Washington 98292 REFERENCE New house at 16406 75th PI. W, Meadowdale, Edmonds City of Edmonds Permit Number 910615 SUBJECT 1. Inspection of drainage system 2. Investigation of driveway slope INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the results of a geotechnical inspection of drainage, - and an investigation of the driveway design and construction, conducted on the new house located at 16406 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds. The geotechnical engineering and report were authorized by Tom Gogert of Gogert & Sons during a conversation with Dale C. Hemphill of HEMPHILL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (HEMPHILL). The geotechnical inspections were conducted in accordance with the following recommendations and/or requirements: recommendations presented by Cascade Geotechnical in the report titled "GOGERT MEADOWDALE LOT' (REPORT) and dated 8 January 1990. requirements established by the City of Edmonds Building Division. Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 The inspection of the drainage system was conducted because Cascade Geotechnical had not observed the installation of the drainage system based on their recommendations in the "report". The investigation of the driveway design and construction was conducted based a letter from the FOOTING DRAINS page 2 of 7 pages City of Edmonds Building Division dated 10 June 1993. The letter stated that the driveway was not constructed as shown on the drawings, which showed the driveway to be a continuous 14%. The letter also stated that a portion of the driveway exceeded 20%, which is the maximum allowable based on a City Code. INVESTIGATION On 19 June 1993 HEMPHILL investigated the site and observed the catch basin at the rear of the house where the footing drains intersect with other drains. There was a slight trickle from the assumed footing drain inlet. . HEMPHILL recommended that an excavation be conducted adjacent to the retaining foundation wall under the entrance to the garage to reveal the "free - draining" backfill material recommended by Cascade, and to conduct a drainage test. On 29 June 1993 HEMPHILL observed that an excavation had been conducted as recommended that revealed the backfill adjacent to the foundation wall, and revealed the drainage gravel at the base of the wall. The excavation was approximately 7 feet deep, and the sides of the excavation stood nearly vertical. Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 3 of 7 pages HEMPHILL observeo--d that the backfill soils are clean fine s to. medium sand that are slightly dan-rmp, but wet at the base of the fill, whiinich indicated that any groundwater vAwas being drawn down to the -level I of the drainage gravel. Below the b backfill soils is a clean gravel that ha®ad been wrapped in filter fabric. Theme pipe was not visible in the hole9e, obviously was DRIVEWAY HEMPHILL revieiiewed ' Drawing Number S-1 of P9Plan # 3332 by Structural Design Associates and observed that the didesign driveway is much different tharnin the constructed driveway. Observations, measurements, asand calculations revealed the advv vantages of the constructed drivewasay as follows: • CONSTRUCTEII=D DRIVEWAY HEMPHILL conducted measurements : and elevations of the driveway, as and observed that the drivewayay had been constructed with smooth transitions fron m the landing at 75th Place WWest, and at the connected to the pipe observed in the catch basin. Red dye was poured into the hole, and then a hose was inserted into the hole and turned on full force. HEMPHILL observed that red water entered the catch basin at the rear of the house within 2.5 minutes with a rate equal to the flow from the hose., entrance to the garage. The edges of the driveway are slightly raised to divert stormwater toward the strip catch basin at the base of the driveway at the garage entrance. . The driveway was measured approximately as shown in Figure 1 with the elevation at the entrance to the garage assumed to be 71.0. The lowest elevation in the driveway is 70.5.at the slot drain. Each section of the driveway was fairly constant in slope, therefore the measurements were conducted between sections.. Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 4 of 7 pages The measurements shown were conducted along the sloope of each section. Figure 1 shov.ws the calculated slope percentage es. The measurements and : slopes show that a large car enterii-ing the garage would have the re; ar end approximately 1.5 feet higher than the front end, whisich is acceptable, and a van could enter the garage without to-ouching the top of the garage door. A large car can stop can the landing to 75th Place We:-st with the rear wheels approximaately 2 feet lower than the front, wvhich is an acceptable landing for as single family driveway. The car exiting from thee north garage can swing the front _ end to enter the turn around witho out the front wheels running. ooff the pavement. The cars exiting from the o garage can swing into the turn -:-around and exit the driveway w1th one turn. Visiting cars can turn into the turn -around to park, then can back out and exit with one swing (as I did with my 4 door Mercedes with an Eldorado parked uphill from me). Figure 2, which shows the design driveway, is an portion of the drawing by SDA enlarged to a scale of 1 inch = 10 feet. Figure 2 is typical of most design drawings reviewed by HEMPHILL outside the structure and above the foundations because of poor accuracy of topography, and because of the difficulty for the designer to visualize three dimensions. Such drawings are seldom accurate enough that field adjustments are not required. If the driveway were constructed exactly as shown in Figure 2, the occupants would contend with the following problems: 1. The landing area drops off 1.1 feet at a 66% slope at the south end of the entrance. Enough that most cars would scrape bottom and hang up. �' i %O r ter' A Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 5 of 7 pages 2. The entrance to • the garage slopes down from 14.7-7% to 19.8% with no transition. IThe rear of a car entering the north garage will be 4 feet higher that n the front on the right side, and ::-:3 feet higher on the .left side, as it ev nters the garage. A van could not eenter either garage without scrapir -19 the top of the garage door. DRAINAGE 3. A car in the north half of the garage could not back out and then turn its wheels to enter the turn -around without the front wheels running off the pavement. 4. A large 20 foot car backing into the turn -around would not have room to turn up the driveway without running off the pavement. CONCLUSIONS The test conducte3ed verified that the drainage system wworks satisfactorily. HEMPHILL also observed that the backfill is a prope er free draining soil, and is also withirm the specifications by Cascade, although the specifications area improper and do not guarantee a flfifree draining soil. If the backfill soils a had been at the lower end of the sapecifications, and a large percentage a of the soils were between the 100 a and 200 sieves, the soils would not only be non draining, they would also become liquid with saturation and the pressures against the retaining wall would increase. Although a 45 pcf efp was recommended for the design pressure against the wall, a proper free draining soil would only exert 1/3 to 1 /2 as much pressure, as seen when the drainage test hole was able to stand nearly vertical (the actual lateral pressures are nearly zero). . � N Fp rFAI JU I Project number 1892 6 July, 1993 page 6 of 7 pages Other .drainage includes the capillary break under the floor slabs, which was described to HEMPHILL as 4 inches of V clean gravel overlain by sand. That would certainly be better than the capillary break recommended by Cascade, which could not stop capillary water, and would actually conduct. capillary water to the underside of the slabs. 7 V kIrl HEMPHILL considers the original driveway design to be defective, and the existing driveway to be satisfactory based on the location of the house and the elevation differential between the driveway drainage and the City of Edmonds property line. The 24.5 foot section that slopes 20.8% is acceptable,- and is, not hazardous. A long driveway at 18% might be hazardous, and a short driveway at 25% might not be hazardous. The arbitrary standard of 20% maximum slope is not Any other drainage is not necessary, since all other living areas are above the ground surface, and no other walls need protection from hydrostatic pressures. Therefore HEMPHILL considers the drainage to be adequate, and better than specified, and any deviations from the plans and/or specifications are either better or necessary. necessarily a protection of the life, health, and property of the public. Recent numerous litigations have achieved similar conclusions that arbitrary standards should not be considered to be appropriate for all conditions and situations. Standards can be considered to be an upper limit above which a -- qualified professional engineer registered by the state should evaluate the conditions from a proper engineering perspective based, on the protection of the life, health, property, and welfare of the public. Project number 1892 . 6 July, 1993 page 7 of 7 pages In nearly every litigation the conclusions were that most standards were established too low either as the result of the fear of litigation, or by _ unqualified personnel. A conclusion was that inflexibility by building departments is generally based on fear of litigation, and not on proper engineering practice by qualified personnel. Dale C. Hemphill P.E. Registered Engineer No. 14777 State of Washington As observed on this project if a variance was required for all adjustments made at the time of construction as the resultof uncertain information, of defective design, or of improper recommendations, then construction would be impossible. Of course changes cannot be at the discretion of the contractor, but should be either recommended or approved by a qualified engineer. G ILEA wnsy,,�c.,$,�` 14777 o RFc1s1�° TONAL EXPIRES 17 FEBRUARY 1994 01 LL �;�� ;r ALL 163410 7s-/4 141 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL INC. L61!t=§KIRKLAND,12016 115TH AVENUE N.E., BLDG. H (206) 821-5080 WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 820-6953 January 22, 1993 Job No. 8906-32G Mr. Tom Gogert 16606 52nd Avenue Northwest Stanwood, Washington. 98292 Reference: Final Letter Gogert Meadowdale Lot 16406 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: As you requested, we have prepared this final letter which summarizes our conclusions regarding geotechnical inspection services that we performed during the construction phase of the project. These conclusions were developed based on our review of the information in our project file, including a review of our field representative's reports which were prepared during our site visits on August 28, 29, and September 4, 5, and 6, 1991. Copies of these field reports have been provided to you. In our soils report for the project, dated January 9, 1990, we provided geotechnical - recommendations for the project, which included recommendations that we be engaged to provide construction monitoring services for the following: • excavation for the building area • erosion control placement • placement of of auger -cast -piles • placement of drain lines • placement of backfill. During the construction . phase of the project, we were engaged to provide the following. construction monitoring services: • observation of grading of a vertical cutslope located at the eastern side of the building excavation • observation of "grading of cutslopes within foundation area to facilitate placement of auger -cast -piles • observation of the placement of fifty six (56) auger -cast -piles for the building's foundation 4200 MERIDIAN, SUITE 216 (206) 647-8588 BELLINGHAM, WASHINGTON 98226 FAX: (206) 671-4329 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL INC. January 22, 1993 Job No. 8906-32G We did not observe installation of the drain lines or the backfill. Based on a review of the information contained in our file, and on conversations with our field personnel who were present at the site during the dates we provided construction monitoring services, it appears that the work relating to placement of foundation auger -cast -piles, as well as the building excavation grading that, we observed, was done in accordance with the recommendations given in our soils report, dated January 9, 1990, and in our above referenced field reports which were prepared during our visits to the site.. We did not monitor any other aspects of the work. ' We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services for the above project. If you have any questions or require any additional services, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, CASCADE President Kevin Roberts, E.I.T. Geological Engineer /G344P ZS"oOOLW QFN CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 12919 N t 1261H NLACt (206) 821.5080 K1RKlANC,WA5111NGTON98o3d cdx (20E)P,23Z�o3 August 14, 1990. Job No. 8906-32G Gogert and-sons,'Inc. 16606 . Stanwood, Washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Response to Review Gogert Meadowdale Lot 16405 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 86-069 1-,�-.;EIVED AUG 16 1990 SDA, INC. Dear Mr. Gogert 's letter is in response to the Preliminary Geotechnical Review Thy 20,. 1990. We were conducted by Landau Associates dated July provided with final building plans, Sheets d and S-2, prepared Inc. dated March 29,.1990 and by Structural Design Associates, axed by Design Consultants dated Sheets 1, 2, 3, 4, 6► 7, and 8 prepared ackage of plans we January 12, 1990. Sheet 5 was not in the P The plans we received from Design Consultants fo Srevised by DA i bas d ewon our verbal reviewed had been eThe revisions were dated 8/9/90. recommendations.. We have reviewed Landau Associates. letter, and the revisions. Specific comments are provided below .GraQina plan rom the concur with Landau that there are terior elevation f loorfferences ( We and deck landing in outside finished grades and the on the elevations that were not accountedfor Athat elevation original differences Plan. We originally recommended to SO be supported with.retaining walls or cut slopes. we reviewed indicate that the building walls will The revised Plans walls on the north and south sides of be constructed as retaining wall is proposed on the south side The the building. A short retaining pile wall will be supported and of the deck landing. accordanceawithgrevised detail 1/5-2. be constructed in We recommended in our soils report that all foundations be CASCADE UEOTECHNICAL August 14, 1990 Gogert and Sons, Inc. Job No. 8906-32G Page 2 supported on a pile foundation which penetrates the addendum native bearing soils found below the colluvium. An prepared which recommended that the basement/retaining wall be keyed into the undisturbed native bearing soil._ This was based on our understanding that a significant amount ,of the colluvial soils were to be removed down to bearing soil. We now understand that significant excavations are not proposed for this site. We recommend that: all foundations be placed d onon a pile sheet S-2 show rted foundation. The revision all foundations will be pile supported. We recommended in our soils report that all piles penetrate the undisturbed native bearing soil at least five (5) feet and be of walla least ten (10) feet long. For the piles under the we recommend a minimum of ten (10) feet of p• ration soil consists of the stiff silt and dense silty sand underlying the colluvium. We concur with Landau that piles may be longer on toe east monitor the site. We recommend that we be engaged installation of the piles to confirm adequate penetration into the native bearing soils. We do not recommend that an expected asdepth the to bearing soil soilmayvary depending on thewn on Cross Section y Sheet , amount of degrading depth to bearing done and the location on the site. ur We trust that this provides uestionsuf feel f� a to contact usratoanyntime. Should you have any q , Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNICCy,o: ,.,... •• , . . Ge ge E. amb, P. E his/pNALf�r..lr principal Engineer t.• Peter -7�-a-4wett Engineering Geologist cc: SDA; Attn: Robert Hughes STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. SUBJECT: SHT: —1— OF 5630 198th St. SW P.O. Box 5366 LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036 BY: IL, DATE: S ' `IO CHKD: JOB NO: (2,rf AA %SDCIFti� I NC F�2 Prc.� CYZ it:7h�:�:�� . . S -`L Fo2 ?J✓r�-r,�, N w �- �� S ° N ro .S H T` 4' (L No c L (,-L J , CA p '.! 1. le ►�1 �'• %>'i''�f:J":"� 01 iF. V O.L. Li c s� r J•t "t Ci-fnCA L (jc..c� : w lc.G �� SCL:.:.. �=(J�S�"Y�: 54—r—A. -4 o � �,�: p/►ro ur/�t^D_, �MO fL�� VVs`� Drc�n:. D��`rFi'...wr�L .fit _ i._ns:.��r1.-r►�,uc,rJ GuN !r . a�C/�h.�,ort.s �,r�cc_.L a.Y ...G�c?�� c,N .. 4� 'H C ....� N✓ r� -c / tD v & , TT t Fna a-, plat r�, S ,� ��, Au lv:' OERMIT.. COUNTER . . GOGERT MEADOWDALE LOT- 16300 BLOCK 75TH PLACE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 896-32G TABLEEE OF CONTENTS Scope Project Description Site Description Subsurface Soil Conditions Ground Water Conclusions Recommendations Site Preparation Erosion Control Grading Structural Fill Foundation Design Slab on Grade Retaining Walls and Laterc3l Forces Drainage Environmental Checklist Construction Monitoring Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 3 Page 4 Page 4 Page.6 Page 6 Page 6 Page 7 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 11 General Page 11 Appendix A Test Boring Location Map Appendix B Test Boring Logs Appendix C Unified Soils Classification System CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821.5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert and Sons, Inc •?" ?!k�"! a COUNTER 16606 52nd Avenue N•W- Stanwood, Washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogext Reference: Gogert M,eadowdale Lot 16300 Block.75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: r At your request, we have completed a soils report that conforms to the Geotechnical Regnort Guidelines set forth in the City of Edmonds Ordinance #2661. A Cascade Geotechnical engineering geologist visited the above s ite on October 4, 1989 to view the site and to determine the subsurface soil and ground water conditions. SCOPE This report provii,des conclusions and recommendations which specifically addresss the development of the referenced lot for a single-family home. This report provides a discussion of the slope stability before, during and after construction, and specific recommendations for, site preparation, foundation design, lateral pressures, drainage, and construction monitoring requirements. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We have reviewed undated, preliminary building plans provided by Gogert -and Sons, Inc. which proposed the construction of a 3332 square foot, two (2) story, wood framed residence with a daylight basement and a garage. The house is shown to be supported by a spread footing foundation. A two (2) tier wood deck on the basement -and main floor levels is planned for the western side of the house. The basement floor will be a slab on grade at elevation 5.6.61. The main floor will be at elevation 65.61. The second floor elevation will be at 75.41. The garage level will be at elevation.711. Retaining walls, up to five (5) feet and up to nine and one-half (9 1/2) feet high, will be located along the eastern edges of the garage and residence foundations, respectively. An eight (8) foot high cut will be required for the eastern half of the residence. The rest of the house will be at or above the existing ground. A paved driveway is proposed to be built between the garage and 75th Place West. The driveway will be graded to a 14 percent maximum slope. A topographic and site map dated October 10, 1989 by Western Surveyors, Inc. has been provided to us. The'City of Edmonds requires a review of the final building plans by our office to confirm that our recommendations were properly. interpreted. The existing topography and proposed house footprint are shown on the map located in Appendix A. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 3 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is a rough parallelogram in shape, west to east trending, 12,800 square foot property, located west of and adjacent to 75th Place West in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington. The ground slopes down from 75th Place West to the west at an'angle no greater than 32 percent. The total vertical drop is about 48 feet.` The property is bounded by single-family residences to the north and south, and the Burlington Northern railroad tracks to the west. The site is located within the Meadowdale landslide complex which is a zone about 400 feet wide adjacent to and immediately east of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks (Roger Lowe Associates Landslide Hazard Report, 1979). At the time of our fieldwork, the northern and southern edges of the property were thickly covered with blackberry bushes and some tall grasses. No standing or flowing water was observed on the property. A catch basin was observed on the south side of the property. It appeared that the water flow through the drainage system was heavy. SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS IOur field work consisted of a visual site reconnaissance and the drilling of two (2) test borings. A trailer -mounted, hollow stem auger was used to advance the test borings. Samples were obtained from selected depths in accordance with ASTM D-1586 sampling procedures. At the time of our soils exploration, the proposed residence location had not been chosen. The test boring location map and logs are presented in Appendices A and B, respectively. Soil types CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 4 were described and classified in the field using the Unified Soils Classification System. The Unified Soils Classification System is described in Appendix C. Soil conditions at the boring locations consisted of approximately eleven (11) feet of loose colluvium underlain by medium dense sand in Test Boring 1 and stiff silt in Test Boring 2.. The colluvium consisted of sandy silts and mottled, fractured silts with organic and log debris. In Test Boring 1, the sand .was observed to grade into a dense silty sand layer (glacial till) approximately four (4) feet thick. Underlying the till was a very 'hard silt. Test Borings 1 and 2 were terminated within the silt at twenty-five (25) and twenty-nine (29) feet, respectively. GROUND WATER Ground water seepage was observed in Test Boring 1 only. Seepage was noted between eight (8) and about sixteen (16) feet below the existing ground level. The seepage occurred just above the colluvium/sand interface. It appears that the relatively impermeable and. denser soils found below the looser colluvium allows the development of a perched water table. CONCLUSIONS The site is located within a well known landslide debris area. The property has been mapped within an old landslide site as shown on the Edmonds East and West Quadrangle Geologic Map (WDNR Geologic Map GM-14, Mackey and Smith, 1971) and has been classified by the GeoEngineers Inc. Landslide Hazard Map (Fig.l as presented in the CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. _Page 5 Meadowdale Site Evaluatttion Checklist packet) as a 4A30 area. Previously failed slump it material which has a 30 percent probability of movement in a 25 yeaa_r period was defined as a 4A30 area. The loose colluvium observed A in the test borings indicate that movement has occurred on the site e; however, no evidence of recent surf icial movement was noted. At the time of'our visityt, the site was situated on ground sloping 32 percent or less on t the western edge of. the Meadowdale slide complex. This area consiists of shallow earthflows and slumps which have moved on a more fro-equent basis than the ground east of 75th Place West, which is co omposed of larger, more coherent blocks. (Pg. 8, Roger Lowe Asso=iates Landslide Hazard Report, 1979). We expect that -the construct:tion of the residence will not decrease the stability of the sites or of the surrounding area, if our recommendations are foll-_owed. The site is presently stable but the owner shold be aware tha-At the potential for slope instability will continue to exist after construction. It is our conclusion threat the colluvium is not suitable for the support of a structural llload if significant differential settlement and an increased probab.oility of slope failure is to be avoided. All structural loads s should be transferred. down through the colluvium to the medium - dense sand, dense silty sand or hard silt. Detailed recommendationsts for the proposed residence are provided below. CASCADIE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 6 RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation We recommend removing all vegEatation and topsoil from the proposed building area. Excavated matesrial should be removed from the site. We also recommend leaving the! existing vegetation intact in areas outside the proposed building location during construction. These areas may be cleared and plantred with erosion resistant vegetation or landscaped in the future. We recommend that the earthwo:•rk be done during an extended period of dry weather. The fine-grained colluvium noted at the surface of the site may cause signifficant additional construction costs and slope instability from tthe adverse effects of wet weather construction. Erosion Control At the time of our visit, thee slope was not undergoing any active erosion. We expect that any e:=rosion will be minimized as indicated in our 'recommendations (See ""Drainage"). Erosion control during construuction should consist of straw and/or geotextile fabric barriers pl aced downslope from the construction area, and should be constructed so as to prevent any sediments from being deposited on the lower elope. We recommend placing visqueen. sheets over any cuts during %wet weather construction to minimize erosion. We should review the detailed erosion plan prior to construction. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inca Page 7 Grading It appears from our review of the building plans that less than 50 cubic yards of fill material will be placed on the site to raise the grade on the east side of the house and to lessen the slope angle in the paved apron area. The fill material should be placed according to our recommendations given in the Structural Fill section. It appears that an eight (8) foot cut will be made in the east side of the residence foundation. We recommend that any unsupported cuts into the loose colluvium should be -graded to 1.5H:1V or flatter and covered with visqueen. If caving or spalling is noted during construction alternative recommendations may be necessary. We .should be engaged to monitor the excavation to verify that our recommendations are followed. Structural Fill We understand that structural fill will be used to support the pavement east of the garage area retaining wall where grades require it. The structural fill should consist of imported fill which meets the following ,gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25 - 75 #200 5 maximum based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve. CASCADE G GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 8. Fill should be placed in twell lve (12) inch maximum lifts and compacted to 90 percent of the KASTM D-1557 maximum dry density in the paved area. Fill should be placed under dry o conditions only. When a dry, non - yielding subgrade is establishoned, the pavement section may be placed. Foundation Design Based on our test borings, we rr= ecommend placing the residence on drilled piers or auger cast pfpiles. This would transfer the building loads to the underlying g bearing soils and reduce the load on the colluvium. We recommend that the residence I be supported by eighteen (18) inch diameter drilled piers or auger c:>cast piles which penetrate at least five (5) feet into the medium defense sand, dense silty sand or hard silt. Individual piers/piles rr may be designed for an allowable bearing load of twenty (20) tonsns, and a lateral load of five (5) tons. We estimate that each pier/pile under the eastern and western edges of the residence sashould have a minimum total length of sixteen (16) feet. Piles/pR iers under the basement retaining wall should have a minimum tot;.=al length of ten (10) feet. We should be engaged to observe these drilling of the piers to confirm penetration to the recommended-d depths. The, spacing of the piers/piles should be selected by your structural engineer. We recommend a minimum grout strei!E--ngth of. 3000 psi to help ensure pier/pile quality. The piers/pill les should be stopped at the ground surface and a grade beam foundasation should be used to span from pier to pier. The grade beam fouwndation should be designed by your CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, I:=nc. Page 9 structural enginneer and we should be engaged to review the final plans. It should be und-lerstood that the recommended depth of penetration specifically reefers to the depth of penetration into the undisturbed bearring soil and does not take into account the overlying loose colluvium. The estimated lengths discussed here are based on then preliminary plans we were provided. Slab on Grade The basement slab on grade may be placed on a cut into the colluvium. We ro-ecommend that the basement slab on grade floor be structurally tieod into the foundation, and designed to span between supports. A foreur (4) inch layer of clean sand, pea gravel or crushed rock hav:-ing less than 5 percent material passing the #200 sieve based on thhe fraction passing the #4 sieve, should be placed below the slab ass a capillary break. We recommend placing a vapor barrier between the bottom of the slab and the capillary break material. Retaininq Walls sand Lateral Forces We understand th;Aat a nine and one-half (9 1/2) and five (5) foot high retaining wAwall is anticipated for the eastern edge of the house and garagee, respectively. Both retaining walls should be supported by a pile/pier foundation as specified above. The basement retaini;_ng wall should be designed to allow the lateral passive load to be distributed over the other piles/piers under the lower levelIl foundation. All retaining walls should be backfilled with as free -draining granular fill which conforms to the following gradati.ion: CASCADE= GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 10 Sieve Size 4 inch #4 #200 Percent Passing 100 25 - 75 5 maximum based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve. The free -draining fill should extend from the base to the top of the retaining walls, and shou-uld extend at least three (3) feet behind the wall. A perforated pipe footing draii_n, bedded and backfilled with twelve (12) inches of pea gravel sh,nould be placed at the base of the walls. The drains should coi•ntinue around the perimeter of the walls and should be tightlined3 to the drainage system. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended may be designed to resist an active :lateral force equivalent to a fluid having a density of 45 pcf. This assumes a horizontal backfill, and backfilling which prece6des first floor framing or other constraints on wall deflections. The colluvium may be assumed to have a passive resistance of 200 pcf equivalent fluid pressure. Drainage We recommend placing a four ( 4 )p inch diameter rigid perforated pipe that is bedded and backfilled in at least eighteen (18) inches of pea gravel at the base of al:-1 perimeter footings. The footing drains should be tightlined auway from the foundation to the storm sewer system. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 11 All roof drains should be tightlined to the storm system separately from the footing drains to avoid backflow. Paved areas should be curbed and graded to direct surface run-off to a suitable catch basin that is tightlined to the storm system. Additional drainage may be necessary in the landscaped areas. Yard drains will likely be necessary to avoid a wet backyard. Environmental Checklist We have reviewed the Environmental Checklist prepared by Western Surveyors, Inc. and have addressed the significant issues with regards to Earth within the text of this report. Construction Monitoring We should be engaged to observe the excavation for the building and placement of the erosion control to confirm that construction is done in accordance with the approved plans. We should be engaged to observe the placement of the auger cast piles or drilled piers to confirm adequate penetration into suitable bearing soil. The j placement of the drain lines and backfill should be observed by our office to confirm proper placement. These.services are in addition to any required testing agency work. General A detailed review of the final plans is required by the City of Edmonds specifications. Once final plans are available, we will" provide a detailed review .with any additional or alternate recommendations that may be necessary. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 8, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Gogert & Sons, Inc. Page 12 . We expect the on -site soil and ground water conditions to reflect our findings; however, some, variations may occur. Should soil conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we recommend that we be contacted immediately to determine if additional or -alternate recommendations are required. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gogert and Sons, Inc. for the specific application to the proposed residence located on the 16300 Block of 75th Place West in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington, in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNI I, 4rge L b P. ipal Engine AG.E.�:,":a .yyry tt{{ • C Z. ClSTE. ason Olsson Geologist APPENDIX A w _ Q o x a �' u O c W Q \W,j� a W qq Q � o m= co Q c °�° Z +6�y Q o O O O aJ N� ___ O�j w I Q 2� _J `0 V \ N LLJ N LL' z 8 o d �• ®m ---- o w LU coo O I W b ( ^ z zN PC co Q ^ = Ln Z WI Q W tk0 O Z ¢ Z 2 � Cf)_i�wi � w O W I �.9'9S'A313 a00-14 t° CD 3 ° z W gg�� I 30N90IS38 I ko z W 3 \j Cl- ` m Z Y — F— C7 � W � o lO LAJ Go LO V) W V S No cc W Q�Q Ln 0 F— W LL r- 0o O Nry Z �� tomO W N z �--� W ��_ F-- LLJCn V _O W Z _N= W � o N'� Zg > o! X= N H_ cc LL a N z L►J LO N Q Y s m ®. w00 o / N M APPENDIX B Project Job No. 896 - 32G Date 10/04/89 GOGERT MEADOWDALE Boring No. 1 Dwn.By HLA Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Type SKID MOUNTED Goo/Eng. P . J EWETT Hole 0 4" 0. D. Fluid ° Penetration _m E 0 o a o N Soil Description & Classification Notes 0 IN .0 0 I COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH MINOR GRAVEL, MOTTLED, 2 3 7 10 5 FRACTURED SILTS WITH SANDY MATRIX, LOOSE, DAMP TO WET. 10/04/89 I COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH ORGANIC DEBRIS, LOGS, GRAY, SATURATED, LOOSE. SZ 2 4 4 8 10 I ;• '• SAND; GRAY, SATURATED, MEDIUM DENSE, VERY'FINE-- 2 5 10 15 15 GRAINED, GRADES TO SILT WITH LAMINATES OF SAND, GRAY. 4 I 20 ?' '••' SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAY, DAMP, DENSE, GLACIAL TILL. (SM) `. 8 12 18 30 I SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY,25 VERY HARD, DAMP. (ML) E 10 30 40 T.D. = 25.0' T, Notes: CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL TEST BORING LOG A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. Page 1 of I Proiect GOGERT MEADOWDALE Job No. 896 - 32G Date 10/04/89 Boring No. 2 Dwn.By HLA Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Type SKID MOUNTED Geo/Eng. P . J EW ETT Hole 0 4" O.D. Fluid >o m CL a N s Q10 Penetration _o N Soil Description & Classification Notes O m .: ~ I3 I2 I2 I13 I12 I12 5 WOOD ;*HIGH BLOW COUNTS IN LOG. COLLUVIUM; FRACTURED SILT IN MATRIX OF VERY FINE SAND & SILT, MINOR TRACE • ORGANICS, GRAY, DAMP. GRADATIONAL CONTACT SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY, ASH LAYER, STIFF, DAMP. (ML) SILT; GRAY, VERY HARD, DAMP, MASSIVE. (ML) SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) 12 5* 17* 10 2 2 4 15 4 6 10 20 17 21 38 25 15 18 33 18129 47 T.D. = 29.0' Notes: CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION Of CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TEST BORING J It ' �i LOG Pogo 1 of 1 APPENDIX C i, UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM � MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL LETTER DESCRIPTION o•oa'o.q p GW or Well- graded ravels 9 g gravel -sand mixtures, CLEAN d:`.aoo- ". little or no fines GRAVEL 6 GRAVELS r:r s GP Poorly graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures, itit'«� little or no fines GRAVELLY .t.ig • SOILS ' GM Silty gravels or gravel -sand-silt mixtures GRAVELS WITH FINES COARSE GC Clayey gravels or gravel - sand -clay mixtures GRAINED • Oe a .• • •,•° .° , •° , • SWSOILS Well -graded sands or gravelly sands, little or CLEAN a 0e a o: a no tines ' `' ' S P Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little SAND 6 SANDS or no fines SANDY SOILS SM Silty sands or sand -silt mixtures SANDS WITH FINES SC Clayey sands or sand -clay mixtures Inorganic silts & very fine sands, rock flour. silty ML or clayey fine sands, or clayey silts with slight SILTS & CLAYS plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, CL gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays or lean clays Liquid Limit Less Than 50. I I 1 I I I I Organic silts 3 organic silty clays of low FINE IIII I II OL i i I I I i I I I I I I I I plasticity GRAINED MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine SOILS SILTS ?k CLAYS sandy or silty soils, elastic silts ' CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, OH organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat or other highly organic soils TOPSOIL '-w..�� Humus 6 duff layer FILL Uncontrolled, with highly variable constituents' BO DATUM NOTE I2" O.D. Split Spoon Sampler Sample Interval Ring or Shelby Sampler Sample Interval PSampler Pushed Sample Interval �C Other Sample Type Sample Interval BO L DATUM NOTE .17 Water Level Date Recorded T$ Torvane Reading qU Penetrometer Reading iWater Observation Well Tip Elevation CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION Of KEY CHART CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. /63�0 7 �G CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 0126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G tv Ay � j , Gogert and Sons, Inc. 16606 52nd Avenue N.W. Stanwood, Washington 98292 Attention: Tom Gogert Reference: Addendum to Geotechnical Report for Gogert Residence 16300 Block 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gogert: At your request, we have completed an addendum to our geotechnical report dated January 8, 1990 regarding the basement retaining wall design. We have reviewed Plan 3332 of the pier foundation prepared by Structural Design Associates, Inc. dated January 22, 1990. The structural notes regarding pier capacity reflect the design parameters recommended in our soils report. We did not review any of the structural design. No lateral forces for the retaining walls were listed. Retaining walls drained and backfilled as recommended in our soils report may be designed to resist an active lateral force equivalent to a fluid having density of 45 p.c.f. The colluvium and the underlying native soil were assumed to have a passive resistance of 200 and CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Page 2 250 p.c.f., respectively. The latter parameter was calculated separately from the design parameters provided in our soils report and was verbally communicated to SDA, Inc. on January 22, 1990. The recommendations provided in our soils report for this site have been incorporated into the proposed foundation design. The following exceptions are outlined below. The retaining walls proposed for the garage front and the east side of the basement should be backfilled with a free draining material as specified in our soils report. We recommend that the basement slab -on -grade be placed on a capillary break as specified in our soils report. As shown on Figure 2 on the provided plan, the retaining wall lug is shown to penetrate one (1) foot into the native soil. No subgrade is indicated for the four and one-half (4.1/2) foot long toe. We recommend that the entire wall foundation.be seated into native soil. We estimate that the native soil is approximately a foot below the toe. We should observe the excavation for the wall foundation to verify that it is founded on the native soil. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL January 30, 1990 Job No. 896-32G Page 3 We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCAD EOTECHNIC ge am , Principal Engineer d nOlsson Geologist JO:mrm CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 9803 1(20ft kq®p� EVERETT 6T1 13�IT/0/B1 DEC 13 i99i TO: 'CJ Q e i— © s 9 ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Cckrci-et FIEI_n TEST nATO SEE FIELD N 0- 61788 REPORT No. DATE /// / Q. CERT.NO-LI PRO T /e a f I'd I,] c. e/ClJ V LOCATION 16-3" l7�-= BLDG. PERMIT NO. CSC,/ OWNER WEATHE� /gyp S' TEMP. AT f &t-&B AM L Q l�l� l f/ S +� AT PM ENGINEER ARCHIT CT t P U C U IBC CONTRACT TRUCK SAMPLED 10 / TRUCK TICKET No. y ZOS 4 70 SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. AIR )TIME l / V' %C�ONC COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH. BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT FA. C.A. WATERooll TOTA �///, , " / CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. G099 11-1 S `% Olz Iz50od 44z0 o$q Z8 I(oSOOo SS40 G09 z I�z000 5�Z 30 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE `� I� -%.I CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED / AEA ADMIX. / CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH, PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES Q's fl COPIES SIGNED: CASCADE Thy I Ilvv L-At=LJI" /-, I ur+ ,, 11 TESTING&INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS N 73533 REPORT No. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE. KIRKLANO, WA 96034 12061823-9800 259 0617 DATE CERT. NO. EVERETT lam / �U/r NG PRO TIVOV %� d 13 r` e c a 199, LOCATIONp4 %5P/Ulf / BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER 910 � 15 T0: WEATHER TEMP. 5y AT/LWAM ��% S hI , VV / %owe I, S ATf PM / ENGINEER ARCHITECT f -}- S11- ` Li G 1 I) V^4z ATTN: CONTRACT R Somis s er (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS bQsekne,;� X RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS SLAB RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS - BEAMS (4) j m IP "L o cp �' 1 a LOCATION (AREAS) V its* a Lteplcl r^o�eV��i� r ©0� CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (PC) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED CAST SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS 7 AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. v RYES _NO —ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS. SET NO. REMARKS: HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY FORM NO. CTL-89.1 CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION ?GI.N RS /GEO GISTS 12919 N.E. 126— PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 9612 61 B23.9600 E VERETT �9-0817 100�� Atop, o TO: '�J e 199 9 4(91 n 60j, — ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIFI n TFCT P,GTA SEE FIELD N ° 61788 REPORT No. DATE CERT, NO. ' PRO T LOCATION = 16_3o-e /7�=tp BLDG. PERMIT NO. d 6 / OWNER WEATHE/'/y." // TEMP. D AT1�B AM � �'LJ e LS AT PM ENGINEER ARCHIT CT , L Pue uVc� 2�i kzs CONTRACT jr © e -SQ ,q 5 ro'k�(J TRUCK SAMPLED �! TRUCK TICKET No, Y Zy.6 `/ 70 TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. AIR )ICONC 50 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT / FA. C.A. WATER TOTA� / CYLINDER NUMBER DATE o MAD,E DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. (OOS9 I1-1 `% 17-5000 44z0 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE �J �� a l� CEMENT_ CU. YARDS PLACED AEA ADMIX. CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH,r3 PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES �Q S P Me2 s L Q. > w.. INSPECTOR: COPIES TO= CC)*C �). Ly)f _A 1 l) 1 �\ 1 -•1: :` . V V SIGNED: F. CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS/ GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126— PLACE KIRKLANO. WASHINGTCNV 9603.4 (206) 823.9600 EVERETT (206) 2S9.0617 TO:\ G ATTN: (I THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: CO C l� C/� .te FIELD TEST DATA SEE FIELD ' `I ° 61625 REPORT No. DATE )/22/ CERT. N® ? Lq lIQ2E P89J,RtT f - �I cmc10 LOCATION 7:9-P/ BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM AT �3� PM ( �� ENGINEER � v c v i- s 3soc ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR p Q / TRUCK SAMPLED (0O TRUCK TICKET No. O TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT .5 /7 FA. 43910 C.A.©( WATER TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATEETESTE M E AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. 5 q� ��/ � l000�0 3`�� C%.Z;Qoc I C6 1 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE AEA ADMIX. 1,4 I PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES �© COPIES CEMENT _�CU. YARDS PLACED \C12 -� DESIGNSTRENGTH r �� . Ell I J,I�G4/10 `! ��i/tg ll, SIGNED: CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 12061823.9600 EVERETT 1Nitmfw NOV 0 8 1991 TO: �� So%L s ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: Co C `/ e !� FIELD TEST DATA SEE FIELD REPORT N, N° 61625 DATE )/29/ CERT. NO. -! aG PR T sl C/i1Ge d LOCATION 7fP/ -_ BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM 1 Ip �� AT I �f PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR 4;6 / e�- TRUCK SAMPLED IQ0 TRUCK TICKET No. o TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR 35 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT .517 FA. 1159100 C.A. 2000 WATER TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MAbE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. 5 -I �� loon o 35-,dr0 5/ l i- 144-0 o c) 510 b 5S9 1470oo SZOO PRODUCERS: CONCRETE AEA PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES A: COPIES TO: l CEMENT CU. YARDS PLACED — ADMIX. / 0'a C Cl DESIGN STRENGTH INSPECTOR: SIGNED: ,T� CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126T. PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 96034 (2061823.9600 EVERETT (206) 259-0817 4 i I rl 1351�_— 9S1Cta V 7 I_riikiF THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED:. SEE FIELD /: (,� I 1 , ° 62104 AGonGT Ne_ Xn DATE CERT. NO. IO - OZ E PROJECT lq.,r; S /ern l LOCATION BLDG. PERMIT/NO. OWNER & '"� S� of o e ,r. l WEATH R TEMP. AT AM Y h AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ' ONTRACTOR I () TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET No. UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME I SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR CONC AIR 3%3v �� G BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT L S FA. v C.A. WATER C� TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. (,, 7 7 )zz000 43 Zo �c zu s 2k PRODUCERS: CONCRETE ` /4Nl6/f/ '�'/CEMENT CU.YARDS PLACED 7�/'"/� AEA ADMIX. CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH��` u / PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES / /� �� N ' ` %✓ a U �/T A '-P l� / /1/1 17`- A INSPECTOR: 9- COPIES TO• ' SIGNED: i. CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION/ENGINEERS/GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126— PLACE KIRKLANO, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 623.9800 EVERETT 4206) 259.0817 N TO: ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIELD TEST DATA t- SEE FIELD � ( G/, ' `� 0- 62104 REPORT No. Fr iJ tc DATE CERT. NO. Z �E 7/- UZ PROJECT LOCATION BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER 1,04h TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT [CONTRACTOR () TRUCK SAMPLED r TRUCK TICKET No. 'w(e TIM1E SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CO'N/C AIR 3; 3o G COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT FA. U C.A. WATER- 7 TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. %5 lqh6kI&1 ' )zz000 4-3 Zo S SILO i 61zu ? �k l 9 on 69 O 81% L -7o I O PRODUCERS: CONCRETE S�`-G /�/J l �`,�CEMENT�/ CU. YARDS PLACED �� AEA ADMIX. CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES I1�-Jr--( 13_ 41— 0 • • • �+�Yiiflllt�s�lA�fitq�t�i• � r � �i. CASCAUC I 1=5 I uVL� vnounss I un T , uvL. TESTING& INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS '12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE. KIRKLANO, WA 96034 (2061823-9600 EVERETT I2061259-CS17 PREVIOUS REPORT No. jv� 73514 DATE CERT. NO. / OO .- / Q 2 • _Z1 PROD 1 TO LOCATION +� BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER lt w f % WEATHER TEMP. AT AM ATPM 3+ 4 P? 1A) Do W ENGIN ER U ARCHITECT ATTN: CONT CTOR Q e �_q ©vL�N3 (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED (3) ITEMS INSPECTED FOUNDATION$ Wg1I5 RESTEEUCONCRETE. _ RESTEEL ONLY FOOTINGS _ SLAB — RESTEEL/MASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS / (LOCATION REAS) r Cl � a' IJ �c Y � V G� c C I % O Uh d4i / eA i G. CONCRETEfMAASSONRY MIX NO., DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) 3 © n SUPPLIER SLUMP (INCHES) Irno 14 �� 6 TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SPECIMENS CAST `E' k AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. YES _NO — ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: L_t�lsl 1 C xy n L . /1 1• FORM NO. CTL-89.1 CASCAUL I LS I IINL� L.AtIUFiAI UHY, Ir'QU. TESTING &INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS -PREVIOUS REPORT NO. 1 N O Q V 8 8 9 8 v .l 12S'IS N.E. �12STH PLACE. KIRKLANO.WA9SO34 (206]823-Se00 DATE /�� CERT. NO. EVERETT B U r L p IWa25S-OB17 G V [r 5EP 1 11g9 PROJECT LOCATION BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER U PL TO: ,[ WEATHER TEMP. s• AT AM AT AbO &M ENGINEER r ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION (AREAS) CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIER / ,e1 .p ry! oA � �%//( „p An / Zr � TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) L!4� �%�A SPECIMENS CAST 2- X L/ �'Z of 3 AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. L--yts —NO_ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: IV& C 7y-< OdV eloU d -S. /�-w� C� �2 �`� • �dD�flG/� �[ �V/� n f�°� G� !/t! / i D 4 /f C �D C J _ ��.D S .� �-P �—F Gt / %}y y ,YIZ ,0 10 71- 1._.0 /-U(/L 7e 4 HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY ----------------- - -- COPIES TO: � FORM NO. CTL•89.1 FIELO REPORT,' CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS/ GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126- PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 96034 (206)823.9600 EVERETT (206) 259.0817 TO:v ` U yk 4n4-f//J�j ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: BUILDING FIELD TEST DATA 1991 SEE FIELD �J 0- REPORT No. II DATE % CERT. NO. 11 / /me-AlL PROJECT 64- 9-0HI.0 t^�� S LOCATION luw 7S v BLDG. PER IT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT AM Q (d AT l� AM ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR /t o ew v r TRUCK SAMPLED / TRUCK TICKET No. O d3 TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. 'CONIC AIR //1444 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT FA. C.A. WATER 52, TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. 2 x 57zo u � PRODUCERS: OCTVC'RETE A-0k 40U N �� YCEMENTpp +'— CU. YARDS PLACED Z/ T �3 moo. ,,ll AEA �- ADMIX.NN, __ JC - IU U S CAC12 % DESIGN STRENGTH�� PLACEMENT AREA 6 NOTES ��! S ! �`- �Kc,(e P r 2�/�- A -PA,,,- ! ! 4 -f- S 9/Z r� c� l L/ -k a if e/( O f o G lt� COPIES I CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS/ GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126T.. PLACE K(RKLAND. WASHINGTON 9603A (206)623.9600 EVERETT (206) 259.0817 TO: AIAoIygGLT &Wt BUIL IN 1991 ATTN: THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: V FIELD TEST DATA SEE FIELD i� I N 0- 62093 REPORT No. I DATE / CERT.,NO. PROJECT LOCATION u BLDG. PERZIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. [s AT g AM Q v� AT lI AM ENGINEER ALRfl ECT ONTRACTOR @e 5 r ,v TRUCK SAMPLED / TRUCK TICKET No. :? kj OS UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR CONC AIR 11444 3 G s BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT 7 W FA. q� ` �J C.A. WATER Z TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET NO. 6-7 [ 1?/3 0 z x 15 -2.00 4 $ 40 57 Zo o/ q Z 1500 G t 5 O Z06Oo 65 30 PRODUCERS: QONCRETZ _0A( AOU 14 44 '00.01 ICEMENT� ` / CU. YARDS PLACED N � 3 � AEA r--- ADMIX. /U �CAC12 % DESIGN STRENG l% �TH PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES COPIES 4 f �-f e:Qm A4o S7` �l/•� U Elld ,T'o L7� v I CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE 5-7)3 1-S 9-11 7 2,' 5714 is-3 Z� 5715 10 -3 Z� N° 66635 SEE FIELD CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. REPORT No. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS FDA:TE CERT. NO. 12919 N.E. 126T« PLACE .. /? / D y-� KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 96034 12061823.1 3 .r 7 C/ EVERETT (206) 259-0817 ,cr-r 1 �- TO: ' l7 ATTN: myzx BLDG. PERMIT NO. VSEATHE R ENGINEER ARC ITECT` CONT THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIELD TEST DATA TRUCK SAMPLED J TRUCK TICKET NO. UNIT CEMENT TEMP. TIME SLUMP %AIR WEIGHT YIELD FACTOR CONC AIR 7-5 (.;D COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH WEIGHT OWNER TEMP. AT//,10QAM O AT PM BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN % ADJUSTED WEIGHTS MOIST WEIGHTS CEMENT / FA. C.A. r� WATER TOTAL TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. (45 00 � ZO 1,6500 5$q0 15200 5s00 PRODUCERS: CONCRETE f.}'f /77DYI <f- CEMENT i�y _CU. YARDS PLACED 33.8 �©nn ADMIX./DO CACl % DESIGN STRENGTH AEA PLACEMENT AREA 6. NOTES Ll >r a INSPECTOR:jai -------------------- COPIES TO. L� 1 SIGNED: CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS 12919 N.E. 126T.. PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 f2061623.9800 EVERETT 4206) 259.0 ,11A7 TO: SEP ATTN THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIELD TEST DATA SEE FIEI REPORT 66636 DATE f CERT. NO. PROJECT L 71 TO L O 1/0 / / iJ BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT/'a AM ! AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT r•' � L CONT T R /11 r' r/cGt n TRUCK SAMPLED ? TRUCK TICKET No. 27 / TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR TEMP. CONC AIR 7-5 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS CEMENT (n FA. / C.A. WATER TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE WEIGHT TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI SET No. z i 4- S o o 4-(oz o 5 a -3 z� 577 14 1, kt PRODUCERS: C0NCRET' * /<f 27 -77 Ur y CEMENT `-•/ r�y CU. YARDS PLACEC _ AEA ADMIX./oo^ CAC1 % DESIGN STRENGTH_ PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES IlVqer C-4z / /0 '-/-c w .�► .�� 2/ A CASGAUC I to I nvLu I ur+T, uvL,. TESTING& INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS `°•�0 G f 7 1� S' a 12919 N.E. 12STH PLACE. Ln j REPORT No. KIRKLANO. WA 96034 12061 B23-9900 61259-0617 DATE CERT. NO. S V EVERETT 120 D PROJECT, 1 LOCATION '] / -2 !/!/ BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER WEATHER TEMP. AT f .e>m ;�P 16 �991 ( /e"- ,-- WO AT PM ENGINEERS _ -e-- ._// f ARCHITECT / 7 /cY. ATTN: A7. 5 CONTRACTO - e, % e- (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED —FOUNDATIONS !IRESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS —, WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION A 4 (AREAS) /� ! S / �- U CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. �/ rC> !/ DESIGN STRENGTH (Pc) 5 !J© �r SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED � / �/ 2 SLUMP (INCHES) v SPECIMENS CAST ti CONTENT SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. (a L� AIR (%) _ YES _ NO _ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: �� J Y .' / % �• .i !J%7 �rl P �% HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY INSPECTOR: 0 COPIES TO: G FIELD REPOR SIGNED: ZA CASCADE TESTING L.AUUHAI UHY, INU. TESTING& INSPECTION / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS N0- 71466 REPORT No. 12919 N.E. 12BTH PLACE. KIRKLANO. WA 99034 [2OBI 8e3-9800 DATE _ p —/ CERT. NO. —� /� 2� EVERETT' { 259—OB17 { / D PROJECT LOCATIO V BUILDtiI N/� BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER -� ekrn�o C� o TO: gam_ WEATHER TEMP. AT c/' / -"r- r C�� AT PM ENGINEE / c ARCHITECT 9 / • /Ct ATTN: f CONTRACTO (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED — FOUNDATIONS L RESTEEL/CONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY FOO�TI S _SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ A� UGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS (LOCATION Ile? Ile 5 .2 7 A�' (AREAS) .4- �� CONCRETE/MASONRY MIX NO. ` o DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) SUPPLIERlop TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED 2�►' SLUMP (INCHES) v SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. «' J —YES —NO _ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: J' l ec-tLl,-wll 0 ,�Zj ✓%I _ be 117 / 3i f oo k �s -- • 4 '4**'O�- 4- HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY 9 i /! ;r' 7C e 0 COPIES TO: ell 5 -f FIELD REP SIGNED: CASCADE TESTING LASORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION - ENGINEERS 14120 N.E. 21st STREET BUILDING BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98007 SEP I 19n, Pro ject ea L v LocationX AUGER CAST -IN -PLACE PILE LOG Date 4� — ?(- Cert No. Inspector Page l PILE NO. PILE DIAM. (inches) TOTAL PEKE. (feet) ELEV. OF CUTOFF 0.00city datum ELEVV, OF TIP 0.00city datum PUMP STROKES start finish TOTAL STROKES PUMP PRESSURE (psi) VOLUME OF GROUT (cubic yards) REQUIRED LOAD (tons) NOTES Pire'3Sv�"�' ,- O 11" s. o0 37 t 32. C) ,j 3/a 13 o54T 7s Q 3 C 5:5- r e. 70 37 o 3fl- D n 7 n CASCADE TE51 Ilvu vINEERSr . GE . �� ST ^� MgnNG6QugpECT1pN / ENGINEERS / GEOLOGISTS PREVIOUS / O n O 0 7 REPORT No. 129/9 N.E.'IQBTH PLACE. KSKLAND, WA 9BD34 1,2 oq B239800 DATE �j CERT. NO. �- /Q L EVEaETr I Del 253 S2 /OB,7 / � ji L+ ! J PROJECT � "tiltD/iS LOCATION �-� S �d6 w C� � A,l NO. � 3 � �� BLDG. PERMIT OWNER TO: WEATHER TEMP.. AT fG AM '*o/ AT PM ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: CONTRACTOR A a -'plt � (Z) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED —FOUNDATIONS ' RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.ST/WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING DRILLED PIERS — WALLS — BEAMS LOCATION (AREAS) CONCRETE/MAS--ONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f) 'c // SUPPLIER 0A,-lA4A tQ ��-Q 'M� X TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED 3 oL � �^ 2- SLUMP(INCHES) Gv6�2hi4� SPECIMENS CAST (� •Z �� U AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO, ZD,CU ES _NO_ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: ycv HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: C k v 7r.� /%o V /i/ G FIELD REPORT SIGNED: 9 NG L�E0�TOINC.s TA�sp��N EOL 12B1B N.E. 128TH PLACE. KIRKLAND,WA 9BC34 ICI B239BOO EVERETT 12p81259.OB17 i TO: ATTN: (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED RESTEEUCONCRETE — RESTEEL ONLY _ RESTEEUMASONRY — STR.STIWELDING OTHER — STR.STIBOLTING (4) LOCATION (AREAS) PREVIOUS n/ G �/� N O 78886 REPORT No. / /� DATC- /Z�/� / CER? NCI. l 0 s - /V �( L PROJECT LOCATION A," -d o Ri nr, PFRMIT NO. I OWNER WEATHHEF3`TEMP. G AT F AM A //Y/ j�v L AT ENGINEER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR (3) ITEMS INSPECTED FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILES DRILLED PIERS CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SUPPLIER SPECIMENS CAST SLUMP (INCHES) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. AIR CONTENT (%) — FOUNDATIONS _ SLAB _ COLUMNS — WALLS BEAMS l YES NO ' ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: /�� Gvf} S o�� 4y CU Ik '% f I �'� o%iC/t Y 7��/ f Z77'.fl� �/r 6/' S c 76 o /✓` 4All HOURS ON PROJECT TRAVEL TIME TRAVEL MILEAGE APPROVED BY COPIES TO: INSPECTOR: OZ FIELD REPOT SIGNED: G@ 1 ;Ioneer National Title Insurance Company WASHINGTON TITLQ DIVISION ,�d for Record at Request of CITY OF EDMONDS 250-5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WY-9-802U— IHIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE, J. '91 i0l 14 A11 :41 SN00MV. 1+ rr.?;.JW , .h C: 2 i'.±E P U Tom.-._ ._...... _....... . REVENUE STAMPS A PERMIT COYNr fR eD Quit Claim Deed NO EXCISE TAX THE GRANTOR for and in consideration of Gogert & Sons,.Inc. N/A convey and quit claim to City of Edmonds the following described real estate, situated In the County of Snohomish REQUI JUN 14 1991 KIRK 1 , So lmmish County T d�urei B weputy State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor a:ay hereafter acquire: The Easterlyt.ten,'(40.00) feet of the following described property: Lot 109 Block 60, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH, According to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of said county; Except that P portion thereof lying North of certain ,fetice as described in decree entered May 3, 1929 in Snohomish County Court Case No.' 26959 entitled Ru'ddies vs. Bell. Situate in County of Snohomish, State of Washington. together with the right to make all necessary cut or fill slopes on the land of grantor's adjacent to the above -described real: property in connection with the construction, maintenance or improvement of the above -described -4r�eal property for purposes of a public roadway. Dated this day of jo4e STATE OF unty of as. On thi day of-_-_-_Z signed, a Notary Public in and for a State o and sworn personally appeared O to me-c4own to be the and A. D. 19V, before me, the under - duly commissioned tary, respectively, of rument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and vol n• uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that le said instrument and that the se� e o�PJ�ateal of said i year in th' c to above written. EET FIL CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 'APPLICATION O% R NAME/NA OF BU SJNESS --�-- Cp - ZIP TE, PHONE NUMBER TITCAME•' 6ILSOZY12 A1 LOU ADD SS ,^ i U a CI ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER: Q 5�',-,-7 7ir, 65^7 FG/a Legal Description of Property - include all easements u (show below or attach two copies# p1 L,,. 6 . ?;!9- 7H3L/ �7s- 3y USE PERMIT ZONE 2D NUMBER I VJ JOB � /jN SUITE/APT # ADDRESS h / 'D /y/� /� /A�p�� (� 'I'C LEGAL, DESCRIPTION CHECK !,/v SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. 95� PUBLIC RIGHj OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING � REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED TESCP APPROVED B Z RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED STREET,USE PERMIT REQUIRED O' iz w i SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED #41f REVIEW BY w REMARKS D $ LU % L - du. FO,G �zv 6 2: 6,��s PEUion/ �,-/ , A&AL E/YFj/NfEiP/Nfi Di✓ �PIDp� METER SI E /t 37y BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE t""M � REMARKSa �v lftva 3 SIGN AREA ALLOW0 ED PROPOSED ,/ , A ENV. REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT 111,4 I SHQREkNE# Tax Account Parcel No. I3/ _Ol O NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADDIALTER COMMERCIAL El MECHANICAL REPAIR APT. BLDG. ): SIGN DEMOLISH . ❑ REMOQEL• OR GRADE FILL CARPORT .GARAGE '0 FEI NCE x_FT) SWIM a POOL WOOD NSERTVEI RETAINING ROCKERY WALL/ ❑ RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: NUMBER OF STORIES �j 5 NUMBER OF DWELLING f UNITS 77, K NATURE OF WORJ� TO BE DQNE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) VARIANCE OR CU PLA NtNG Y D,,E —�g�— /7S SETBACKS —FEET HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE Tj FRONT 2.� SIDE35 REAR7,` ZLj .5 Y TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. CODE HEIGHT [AEC�'ED SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANC� T OCCUPANT UIRED GROUP �� LOAD T YES ❑ NO REMARKS, PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 O s J fi(14A INSu Ae°L /ice I.NA Ei►,�itb % �op,E m FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE �.. PLAN CHECK FEE 1V 1 /wr cluoijoe.,L44% P4 /0- /t C L 6,Ue�✓ E BUILDING Y,Q 5 PLUMBING Plan Ct1eCl( NO. /Z/ MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days u, W "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, .its officials, DZ,49 W Kn ��77 Qemployees, a = omodify, x and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." /O PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE Code of fhe State of Wash In ton relati g to Workmen's omp nsa- WORK NOTED tion.Instjrance. SIGN E (OWNER OR AG T DATE SI NED c� ��j .J v INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CITY D EDMONDS ATTENTION CALL FOR INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE %%1-.32OZ UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. ` /7 I IM.N7 APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provid,@d. FIQrAVI S•SVaAdf3E / DATR' AFIELEAS D BY ? DATE ,4 - 7- `?n_ ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor �a' dal• �0° ^�°, � �� ay O° �?° �• M _ Wo o oSIR ff' FILE d U e� ly Lot,Areal 21)730 Sq, -F�-t, 00�� ResidenceFt,(11% Nquyen L��-� Cov .ra e 2,439 S 16340. 75th MO. W, g q Edmonds, Wal 98026 Lot Slopel, 8 Scale; #-201 Tax 'Parcel # 5131-060-Q,10-0G. 02 APPROVED BY PLANNING.. ,.. NOTE: E D Ne�ght Calcs are VERy messed up JAN 14 2004 or verification of h t.mit comp'liance v i � g see planning data sheet in street file = : - -- PERMIT. COON TER 1 J VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTED ' ( . . ..i � .• ,• •� • � aD �, � tti 0•tcr+plial► d t4ltsu0ic�ba' Nolte ' Ptr7`1CG't�7Ll,a`[ ItOt.� .• ,► .t, t► .1.. 1"R�. COP-4-4 F (r OMw Y �" TTER • t '• �.. C I ..PTJ_0Jwt,L-=== ad 1 �. P VEMENT WIDTH THE LAND REFERRED TO M=1N IS SITUATED IN STATE GF.; HE �6, 5 .c lr,r T. `rt� coWc. 511.WAL�C G�42� •. ; N T COMM i ; WASi32 G QN O OF SNpHtJ1[#5Ii AND IS,DESCRIBED AS FOItiA�IB s. -- t: 2 3 7 10 �. SANDY SILTS WITH MINOR'.GRAd,L. MORLEO I`iW S3.4 I y _� _- .__... ,.•�� •• •HETCT RED SILTS WITH SANDY MATRIX, LO(ki-, DAMP TO i►Ot �.n B�CIC}C 6Q ' , lac .Of MQA40Wdal®'Beach, according to plat s W St. S • ©1\7 to C ITT Of-- E PMO QD S L-110STANDARd thara©t recorded in Volume S of Plays, ' page 38, record® of said T lo�aa�a9 county; i n �------ 2�4"diFtT�RtAL 1 z 4 4 8 Q �I �. SANDY SILTS WITH ORGANIC Ol,wiiIS, LD�3S � EXCEPT that S� �0•3 portion thereof lying EXIST 5SM M }} GRAY. SATURATED, LOOSE. y 1'tt.� North .CAP certain ge11GA as.. . -brAL 2 ,.3 ;- 4 - Z1, 0 HEM L vr-Lr• N RIM �4-8G3 !d r I described in decree entered Kay 3, 1929 in Snohomish Count 1 � 41. S TR , •�--w. o , i superior Court Cause No. 26959 entitled Ruddies vs. Sall. y 06.(. MA'x 41- 10 ( 1pG/lec.t� TO _.. 2a, v GITY ol~- ep oi.10 �, A. !' I 2 5 10 15 Q; GRAY, SATURATED, MEDIUft DENSE. YE; r FINE- c'a r RAINED GRADES TO SILT WITH LANSIiIATES ;F SAM, _ P�`dR fRdVf/ r 1; GRAY. s _ ! Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. ------ 1 ►,.I M I r of �t /� f�l N <A10 J _rAx r4�CpuN"i..1�b, SIB I-oho-alQ C]pp3 I ` Lc---- -ONE aF-i _ I 8 12 la 30 �IACI M71t trtlTH SOME GRAVEL. GRAY, OAK', DENSE, s E?0LA DA (C C AND J / GxIsT / ! 20 GLACIAi TILL. (sM) WE SiE2N SLaC�tlr �2SINPO c��(# �nj E p pN ,. / pe.Glc 'XiST RGUc I.INEo J Rt;SIC iC.---0WHOZ SNIP L NtI mlasi E rt� use -- r�`1 (� A1E 10-10'Si I l F71M SCC -0 .0_'n C31.•VG �1 ��GtC . �J J / f V 1 I 30 30 40 S1Li; WITH LAMINATES Of VERY FINE SAND,'t'RAY ' J �'"LINt=-TYP I f / VERY HARD. DAMP. (ML) Z`S'•�+ ! T.D. • 25.0' fJ so -01 6� d 61 �N L_._ --viz]. ,1 /t -,• .�• � � f r 71, ' . EIS q- y a. • w L4D Ild os � , / CASCADE GEOTECHNN �� I OG 1. ALL ROOF DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS WILL BE TIGHTLINED `"r"g ,. , � rr , ' r ,�I cAs oEt�ns,w of TEST G L To "ao rP'o� "o>;�} ---- usu�nstwcwoti►t�l,..•� THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SEPARATELY. ll' _,� __.. ►.c•�;.., al .1 �r�n 2. NO CONCENTRATIONS //�� + o W S - ee'• E ; 4 1 r raz- , (; - 3 s TIONS OF STORM RUNOFF WILL BE DISCHARGED TO SC: Lam_ ;P "y ,�' l x u s►; ,`. f : I / F�'{►cr_ ,� �0 �' �� o g sal 0.«,�1..,, a cto..Rtt.a GROUND SURFACE /+ T A sly o •�` 1 D / r; 111 ° ; �t , tt PROF�3CCi �,ONG I I �/ 3� 1 -6y f t I LO SI[7�Vv;/�l. Q 28 I ALL SITE WORK IS TO BE CONDUCTED DURING DRY WEATHER. IN [U •i�o THE EVENT OF a , RAIN ALL EXPOSED ' 1 � ,.^ ' ; e .: • �.- _--- ,A 'h ,,� t I / : j j PLASTIC AND THE EXCAVATIONKEPTSDRYEBYWIL1L BE COVERED WITH 'rr 3 12 5. 17• • HIGH FLOW COUNTS IN LOG. POSITIVE DRAINAGE MEASURES. R BY OTHER tit . %/ 1 ! LR e +� j / ' O 7- m 4 ( J �. r f ` / _ n.� r ►' %J �v l �: ( i r i 4 i 1TO R>:'r�l IN�r �D+ ` I l a' EXCAVATION WILL BE PERFORMED WITH L SI�Y-- �- �` IGHTWEIGHT EQUIPMENT. _ I .. ;:} I �Y �+ �' � I 2 2 2 4 FRACTURED SILT IN MATRIX OF YEii FINE 5. A GEQTECHNICAL CONSULTANT WILL 'BE RETAIN • ; + �' I a a S `Ql / d L SAND E S LT, MINOR TRACE ORGANICS GRAY, f r A, ; It,, , / r rcf D IN ; d tom. ALL SITE WORK. RETAINED TO MONITOR !, 1 I • r r. a a ; '• r / GRADATIONAL CONTACT •l } �- �-� - ' - �. _ _ '� I/ `_.'1±. :' �`- -., t,t. i- Im_ JJ'1 7✓ J1 L } . O ! NO CUT SLOPES ON �Fi DQa�� 1 - "%x " ' •wY\' LX _ 4 THE SITE SHALL EXCEED 1.5 H' I V XIS GPa (r �'CA e 4 1i 10 MU; WITH LM14TES OF VERY FINE SAND. r># •r,' i S•f_.T l? ASH LAYER. STIFF.DAMI+. (Mi.) �r i� 5D I0.&0 e:yIS-r CGf3 I c}S. I L Ltd 1 °y - - 1 7. A 0 _ �,I a i`r is EX ST C•G CONTINUOUS GRAIN. WILL BE PLACED ALONG I THE OUTER BASE OF THE_ TAP aq•r,(, v1,r�,rY ExisT I� 6"PVC TAP �H.��f I3 17 zl 38 ; MAY, VERY HARD. tiAr�. taASSIVE, (r;l FOOTINGS AND TIGHTLINED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THE DRAIN WILY...:' E zS 13 trnr-,,r e ca►ie 71 IN 8,GC4 51 `' ; 0 it T}} 11 oUT (oat. o c{ �, I } / CONSIST OF A FOUR (4) INCH, DIAMETER PVC PIPE WHICH I$ N 67 3 5 't» V(/ 5T PE.E. 1 S ? � ;,� HACKFILLED WITH AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES OP PEA GRAVEL..; t" i 0'i M t-4 t W /i '� I 12 I5 18 33 AS ABOVE. (Nei ) - 3 Z G i ! 60,0 E(P l l.. P = �l5 PC.F Pl1SStvr^c (� iS-0 O� Iz �jD. I L3UILC>tNC� BL_c>CG SGTf3 cK o I / 12 l8 29 4 9 APPf2vk 371Q c� C-uT- e. q-0 C YP FI LL r► I I 71LT; AS ABOVE. (ML1 1 O N O I N I C. A+1 +T TT2 , / .D. • z>i.o• s � � E� 0 CASCADE GEC)TECFtNiCAL ,. , CC v�A1 �a c? A ,a - TEST BC31�.1~IG i OG r\I.i'7 i, �..v . - n/ / U1i_ADt tE1HNG WO.1.idn. eK Poq• ' 1E! • Z•ZG C-TR2 r t� SCALE 1 - 20'-pt1 f vW l_ S T , � $.3�o r7 iz :° lo.s% 1 7, c I I 97J 9 34 La 14�o I t o � lolu Q��.Sf t� rt"I.11"� E,,: 2t�t-•ttw;• .s . �� 7 PPG.J raUSt�� CmrtA�E TV 'J SIo - ✓ r GT 3 Wit: S4.o ii _ ._ _.._._..w...__....: _._...._.... ...__. __- (3 1�� Z. 5 e1 d - - _ .___._._ _ _ _ !w If :II L>n t . O % , t;Y ,t{�Q,t�,, 396.0 5F' rx reo f s&Wt turIWAL, ,t'• r . N rr O rc urn t7 tr, C' S'4 $ , 0 t r / .. use SrAa is OR Nr� Rritrf - i e 9W on 9" awe[ /dMC av L'&ML Z. 4 L5T ;QZAfl . - ,_... as I 107D 4y•aic ro nrr�epv r rCro _ rmw Lr�T Z.ti, 8 Tp Grf�;i..iNE. ...... _ ,67o_ r 4ra3t, t tl�Nt L I i ,IIIt _77 0 , ^,� �,I r b trsaiG 6+►a+�i r 1 `.. _. 1-o t� 1 I . • ctt.2�t DES1Ci•3^ ASSrx1 �jN \ 11 i i I i "-If �rtS tf1- LJr i wG. CRP �// -- �.. _ 3� S� Gh� P X 30 -D ti. 20Ge.2T S 7 3 ! i ss- snaEo t-E t.1 G N ES -7 % 4 tltr-S G, " _7CD 11/411 � ortJr--iGC ._. \ it • • 4' o --.----f 1 , , C 4 L TY � LL P� {r' s t, rl ., • • • , •, • • . • • • • • • • • • • • •r • • • • • • i • •. ' • . � 6- . . _y • ,,' � .____ _ �'�t�P©SE J G+iZ/�t Dl1 _ ,I 11 -- - -- - - - ..JL _ - ._._ _. J► � / '• . I�� , /�"�, 1/i = L° G't'FZ U N i=, ' � ro- � - �'�i r`�«ci®"r ��v ACC�PTABL STORM W/-,T E R' DETG HT I O F-•1 5Y S TEI`'� _ E TIGHTLINE MATERIAL It - STEEt FEMCE iK1S7S . N-12 ADS r'"� Sch 40 PVC _......w_...._ _ ELEVATION SECTION GAL'?-/�,G,E .. ----- �........ _ ... .. ...... .- ... ..• .._.. _ .. . / SDR 35 (ASTM D�034) • RP -71•A SILT FENCE DETAIL _ f _.._7 0 • v �# i - - - i - - - - -- - - ts,sT t k "OTH . POSf flu- EROSION/SEDIPIENTATiON MOTES 1er°:CM `v•rt V a.� , n•n sr 1 r+ 1 k ; n' I PARK 87 is - t c b!Qewriut -_Sul Ca�r+ewA:� 1. All limits of clearing and areas of vegetation preservation as described on the s1ArN ; a 1 :.-,,�Sr + R=PS'dlJllt 1.. h 11 b 1 1 1 MEADOWDAL�` ,t <j!?++fiK zasrr aW w L.T. aW S L ate--- PSR t4pk ASA+ 4tt COI-IG d- taQ/�I (9) -W 4 CANT i 6 n , , ►- ii _ I qt1 I I` of It 5CA� ... (-V*, N C5 a 0 I • �•(�" r/tllk I 1 7, • 4'• s» otwwr sP.t t s • l2 ROCK- LINED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. NOT TO SCALE LO GATE A.T PV_0 P� t t� D21 VEv',/AY PROPErZT`r Lt ME i 5. ( ... ice-tr---- V - 70.0 30.0 p a s a e c ear y f egged in the field and observed during construction.------------- .i--------- L_ t°T'It .wr 1 r O IHPLSw 2• I eAcrucrry ' r ►� "; F3G :.Y.+' J_ All required sedimentation/erosion control facilities must be constructed and 1 WHAN/ r r� ,µ 1K •TMXh•� - SW;< Q in operation prior to land clearing and/or other construction to insure thet 1 r D� 1 I I rI M1 sediment laden water does n enter he natural i Yrr '� 1 s _ " ST r`s' of t t t al drainage syst em. s e All C '`�'' 9 y 1 erosion J� 1� � t t I a sa r 4 � , and sediment facilities shall be maintained in a satisfactory condition until ortsv such time that clearing and/or construction is completed and potential for 1 yk• 'a t tt T 1 t } on -site erosion has passed. The implementation. maintenance, replacement and N'► i additions to erosion/sedimentation control systems shall be the responsibility c"r� ` d ,w a tY of the permittee. BR 0 wN • • ` ,'�_ F "".,r.:>a 6 ! "", 8T T d W ' 3. The erosion and sedimentation control systems depicted on this drawing are BAYS' _--, intended to be minimum requirements to meet anticipated site conditions. As T ' tot•PLow� i I construction progresses and unexpected or seasonal conditions dictate, the I t sw permittee should anticipate that more erosion and sedimentation control ! 1 r ,, +"N „ r1 g ; facilities will be necessary to insure complete siltation control on the proposed site. During the course of construction, it shall be the obligation 4, FA D At , , �' e w t rt•." ► r Q 1 I and responsibility of the permittee to address any new conditions that may be created by his activities and to provide additional facilities, over and above ,%NON N iEuH7r r u' .:.•.• '> = w •t :; • minimum requirements, as may be needed to protect adjacent properties and'water •- _ _-i..rAAKo(aovcRav�'i"�►'� a� '� •�. a. ..... ..,.,,,, ....., E cr'`• I quality of the receiving drainage system. 4; Any disturbed area which has been stripped of vegetation and where no further r�f� V I I f� work is anticipated for a period of 30 days or more must be immediately t2, r�.e��e•to• t 't I t , ` stabilized with mulching, grass planting or other approved erosion control PIG 5�p,t C treatment applicable to the time of year in question. Grass seeding alone will be acceptable only during the months of April thru September inclusive. Seeding may proceed outside the sped fled time period whenever ' is in the STRUCTURAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC-' interest of the permittee, but must be augmented with mulching, n netting, or 1,!}`N �1 other treatment approved by n1E 50{L�+.,E11GtZtrE \�J�t,- �CONSULTING ENGINEERS - pp AlalpteA4t►tl.,_ - 1'��_p`?•.�1]t� /�.O 17061 7)1/� 5630.108TH. ST S.W • LYN^1WD(\D WA 0e036 . + .,. , • 'S_ ` M1l ccff E_ Silt fences and filter barriers shalt be inspected Immediately after, PHON adch rainfall and at least daily dtirlAy prolunytr@ ralutall. ArVr ° �_ u t- r� , rcyutrcJ rcil.lrs %hall 4c tiudt itl►tr@Iattl,p. r�� (� ' .�G,i�.� C y j KO O SOS t i G• (awE> 52 PNVE N W. }� 2. Sht,u/@ the fabric on a fill ftnce or filter baffler decompose ur t ,� • . �VY.j/"�� brcllac Inctlective prior to the end of the 4A Cterl J016bie llft'•n@ �' �j ``.. JOB NO: the barrier still be stcit►sary. Ihc.fabrit thall t+c tryla4tJ prwpll F AWIN V c ,p f� '� � w`` 1�.�2 G 3. Sediment deposits shoulJ be ru•oved after each %tofu ttvtnt. ihty ew,fib DESIGN:of Vic. birrier. east be r,•tJ rhtq dr�aslti rtatl. ai,ylraalt.tttlr tklt•hai/ the height ;9r i�v3V(�� ('�' •-� 1-1.......... 4. Any se4leent @cpotitt ►Istaatnin9 in •place after. the %tit lance or. GATE: liilcr hauler It au luulrr r,:,tulrcJ sscrt t,c @rc>Icd %0 CunlOtn 3.Z 90 /, t� , /t / =_ A L1 _ �✓' �T 11 C,p{'', with the e.l►lHly yraJtr, prePaeJ a+.d ferdeJ. .................. ("^�.:. i..,w.' OF...., ........•.. t M V% I Ll I -a: z 2d 1 O u !' ' � . Yr - - - i I . �.. •.... I 1. I : I , .. • • �' fIVEWAY ' 1 IEr� r�L.l�,'tbtJ - . ;: NE: G(0,5 ,.i'f(� COWL {Y .WALr- c �12� NW s 3 , o __ .----..__.___.. _... _ ' .. i Ut � . .. . E Tli' N� �UT1EA s' f n�froAen ?4 I,'n , t 1 irf . { i } r .. • "p S•ii D.Str�fae L Gs[alliieth6n , leilll►; r I, 1 �T� a « PAVEMENT WtpTH r rj+Hn b ' �E >I>` b ', •• .05, >�T l�'A Iksot&# mIft- bip �lW � X,` , .' > gr$CRz81t�b A3 1OtlM1�31 - • „ +fr i i +-rt ^ J,qi. t I S:v, .,.7441Sd,, U. .., :a. . j 2 3 ) ]0 SAOY SILTS WITH MINOR GRAY t : r` C., , , ,i,; n.t ,,3 . ',, + .. , t' , •"� • • S1 T Ell IIp7TtEb i i{'; a „'jk'� :,, 1d .r trI,, •{}4+I i ,. .; .. �% WET, L S WITH SANDY 11ATRIX, LOOSE, 6AHA TO ]YaCt� �b :`Sx1C1 aCi �1 is<' i�ks`ii.l� ill . l •� et , I�ea�tJt�ding to plot •�--- th+� > � + i + rdf t . tt .•::: � � 1 ` ►i > Ir ;,'- " f ;:.38 ' > �t�b B 01: laaid �/ 5 (�` -r-[� � JNWt-1 Gy.'r (�P �,F* l'' 31'.lt�S 18".SiA�Nt /D�ARp _ i.1o/o4 A9� � tIbimi� ,{�•• � :.�' ,F. .: .. ,►;' ,,.. 5 St0. J 1 L+ �- V (1 r GrilAl. j i ' I r st l,i }'rRs T f� IG„ I xu�i tag oft `�:,t, � �� JZ/ /` - "�� t 2 4 4 8 SANpY SILTS WITH t1tt�AN1C DE8R15, 'i,i1GS: rr:' ; : �+or� hi iia6 ' `;' rig v nr12>r' IJa1 �I��Cbl i1 Q12iC44 $� 'o- S �. �0.3 / SS M it r+ , LoasE.. , I d��li�ii41 �fi t �' M can TURATEd r fltitlf �4firbllt+lll !� , hO h Coun - EXiSt' 4 ,r. — I d r i�tt c�ttif "it�t,'" 'tits #sami� ty 'SAL- 2 3 4 ' .6 M�1-! t: /e=l.. N �1E�1 4� 73 o t ; 1#ts +i '�E� ,6:� , Is" $I t� tUt t� .fit �'q 11 . Z ti, 0. 15- 41 5 GTRZ i ; ( 14 [7� t�lrlj ti'S1� 1 ^ ... • U 2 5 10 15 S9NiI' GaAr SATt)<iATE r I D. f1EOtItt1 bENSE. ttEfiYljht+ r;,: ' ! t•, g6,6 f A, x 4-T-- l cIr'Y o� Rt7NI01dC S Z� GRA]NEb GaAb&S Tb SIIT WITH UM1nnTES of S I h t1��#'h-ill-? ,h the CpLiYY stir i f �. FBI. PIvV r odor. (SP-►tL) ,,A 4 h ' G1 WIb41Zil�.h�ttstis (. 9 (,._!;M_ j",, , -- GL�j�11-I G . i' .: u i' . .:; ' fi t M1c ,- G I w 0 :� / ' ' ! I 8 12 I8 30 } ; WITH SOME GRAVEL' BRAYS,b*j bEpSE, UUN1;> ' lacy •- pt ` 1.0 �7 ;' 13Ar t�0 1�I iH; - uNE a -� I GLACI T LL, isM) I J ' W5-S'� :�. f';V c c 16 k ��((I/N Apt , I�w1t��t3� / (pCl tY �:I, l 5T Irxl ��" . , F , �u� rN��^ - i . I j / t�t� ESI�IG- c� CL� S7 �1 tI�N( I / R t �wr I; uNr / �11 r lcc 1;�� 1 I E31.Pa _ 67rF3RGK . ! I i I 10 30 40 LI: WITH LAMINATES OF. MY FINE SANDS BRArS i' "P I / ,. —t JN� TYP I . I I VEar HARD, DJUtP. ii�) , . rI / \ .li C i �0 H I 0 I Z S. 0 I/ : 1 1 T.D. ■ 25.6, I is---- - — - - - - - \ + �' I t t .$S G,4 _ .. r 'ii' .... _.. _... -. _ ar'�:.tf#. l __.. _ . / - - - — — -- . tar "' 1 CASCADE GEOtECHNtCAi , iiOi�ll~ bdWNtJP�tJT$ A . ( __. t. -tl ,� ALf' Nn P06TINE�,, 6w"s , WILL BE. TI�HTLINEb : - artiY i TEst eRIN� lb �: t w t. CV,"t Ilea "'�, r. , - I : , o.•so•. o• 0 '1'0 'iNE' . uRAiNAdE . S PAftAT L • 1 .. _ .. _ i A "t. 1 _ ' t _ �. fJ,SCJ,IX ttS ►+,; r ',•. ' ulo. 0 > oar ,.ht , It7, 4s {k;t,, f'� 1� r `:. 3 e' _o J I o M fro hon . t t , , O , V �1r r , f t i E 0 C � o J N n z N s•� t � za / NTRArPI } 3'Cl 1 � f : RM' RUN ILL b }} r �, L » S 7 � "•d , r � CH , � .► `'ti �."' 'o � ARCED Td J' 1 o �' __ t. 'r. t r. T •r • I (i S I D 1 1 •v d • r i C o.' t � �� .�• t � r< .•r, a 11i N , e cro c.. tirNb �UR� t t y :4„ c .. Nef•i 5 ` Ep �:. 0 li o 3 ,, *, ' t /� i 1 r ' t • ei uk it i. , . .[Q- U , l i Y- �N Y: s / r V � tll , , , a C! ! 'A A A t I �` �?. ;•y, i tR.• -- - f RDFC)$ Dl,c i l 4 }:A i ;,1$iIt :.WORi4 f �;` " �h r r L�' �'' rti 4 I �. K:.BL` Gt�l?�ti)UCt� {bU2INd . CIIRY WEATHER. IN e % ,•,. I� 1 3fo 0 1 , �: . ! i t ,e SItVv1�1i. eG,.28 �VLNi' t� i�A 47; t e I- g ,r - / �'' I� - ' Att E'XPC�.'I1�D 6LOPES3 'WILL, BE CdV �C �1 r' . I (cry i o }��. ,!``; ; a' II �rxat�; ray � z:i�r Iztt�MT p i�REd WITH % 1 1 ,: _ 4 ;" I$fitG= At�D THIJ hXGAVAItSN EP' I E t , 1 k t bAY gX PUMPING ©, e rt I R Y aTI1ER d•:. rG, j' n Ap� i' / 1 3 12 5 17 HIGH ecOW COUNTS IN LOG ^' f'OHITIVR DRAIN ,. h I r. AGEtL�ASUREs. M a . , �: W / . / �. I G�3 S I V-. S• i . i" A . ti. f 11n :R'1 11 �' ,r:l' t 1 �', 1 V j . .. { •' �. ' , " ;\I-CDj� S D 1 g. K <. �r a; " 1:, ►`-•t ►� F,(Ze ,r, ( �.. 1 f o 7 © '' � r ;''� , ` ! y l �: { t • $CAVAZ`I ON WYL,L 8)i .k;tt`(7R14 r, / i i i.� �#s ( t; r.. ; :� ,; ',{ �.s o- i� _ % e; ED WITH LIGHTWEIGHT EQUIPMENT �. ,: � c i . �' i -1__ � t I . i LT'- - ' r• - FRAC E SI x/A�i, v 2 4 2 4 TUR 0 SttT JN MATR X i - :t ,r 'a` t l 0 .VERr FINE ��' G�A��C1'it+1l , ! ', . r • :� -,t CAL CC1N$1►�S,TAfdT: WIL - ,;:.., r> :R.'. I ul ' 1 L:: NIT 1 �ENC.t; t fZ�G' m i; (� r: r{, _fXc at//.Y + �q S SILT, MINOR RA NiCS, pprY DAMP. E .RETAINED Tt� . C?R I � Lf l b � T CE QRGA Gt1A �j��?. �[�j'•1,'�f}� (�/y X . iI �� ,., ',• r �•:5 ra. 11' �! 't+ '� -.5'� P �` ' h - ,.'tfi,N.i .l�l�li f1VR • + r" :t' . t§' +• > �h Q nJ , �IADATIONAL CONTACT i >F` ' ? i 1 ,y "• e, a= Yi .l1Q . i 1 , ! '( I ^k, fi' l' , ' �Uw ,1,.t 1+••� �., ,.., ' I _ 6 ♦ -••J7W '{ .i. ♦ I - -._ ._ 1_. s ��' �'' o I ;ta1'L{I'3, ON..'tiv•f BITE.:SHALLXEEt� Irk N . I V I 'l ¢/TUG . } "'•,, / r X - d e 4 t 1O UU; w]TO LAMINATES OF VERY .) i I i �FT� D /h ryt �( �� i Iil G QLtx'1 ASH U ER FINE SANDS r, I „t: ' k.� ,�., XIS 5 _! t r [ 1�CrK Y . STIR, OW. Oi) I i ! 11 1 . ___-_ .,y... --._.... _.. _ -_ _ Tv P g I.0 9 ' e ; ' I __.—.r. , �- G13 f11 ' .;I ' E..+r {�` SD I Id.bf9 >' E 7 3 s 4 i P 4C4.17', {31t-o3 '+ j l i 1 r ,4 w �; A Ipi`i'NtICyVR ['1�2Ait, W �' ,a L,L BL PLACE! ALbNt. i'HE dUTi;R EASE OF THE . - O t151' GQ 12 <I 5,1 Lad• '-I:ii �l � , i I EXIST C i�., ' . 1 1 , f 2• fade Y J f'Y FIST i� �' j r ' Ci;,. , ` ii3iy k��.Catf i 13 17 21 SNi' AiiZr`+r1� Tif1L ' Pti ' `' % I tLI: GRar, frERr HARD. i1At�, �sstrE. (ML) I ItJAt $ gYBTEM, TH9�.DRAIN WILL i E zs13 mlorz.7h Co0"st- ;' �rTM ,4 ,' IE 114 e / !r."tiiiHlS QF A > +ti'' �;�4 j - INCH' :,b1AMETR>l1r' PVC PIPL. W 1 I I, .11 �'� � ,+: _ � I� films, tp�''t• G'. � I !I ;�� t ' '. , � 4 ~7- ' � i7AL: LA.YPiV ; wZ 171 � i Gd. 57Tc.' �: st7 I ,art, I A� L)�fi EIG�iTE;(1$ INCCiiES Cf ►�, 3 vU I,.. _ _ _ . _. . 5 / 1 „'r )SEA GRAVEL. �Nf�i'; C7 ► ,3 .I Ie s iLi• As APOYE. (ML �. G/ASGAt c� Iyn sW11 1 1t� l �I MIT ��8.q 3Z•G+ p 1�..%)` 9 , `1 �I ,� tO I�=t_ P � y p1C-�•` I ��IyJ� - I0 C•K �� I-^ $- ° - O , t w.> ��' •�-_..._.._- _ . _. _. _._. _.. _. SO. _..._ - .. f ',a �,{.,. i.iaillici N� r�l_pa s C- 1 1�n cK ' I r•+ 1 �t ,, / 12 18 29 47 �#ldTi AS A9 �,' W 9 Ak .. 3%8 GyL`� .. �'0;..C�'Yi� ..F-14.1.. . I OYE. irk) , t9.o' 1° Nil' ,SIGN I t=1t•1T �i.`1,E'5 nfyrI "ram . _. _ _..__--__,._._, .._. _ _...____.____—_--.-_ _- __.-.._._ .__._.-- -- _ . ___ ._ _.. _. _ _ __. _.._.- __.... i 11 1 CASCADE GEbtECitHIC1LL c I+ I E1(I s.T' 5SI�[ 5r-�e^ - [ i' ,a TEST BORI o LC G I J` N FtI M ?} `1, k# _ / uwux ttsiNw wla.,o:+..+< ►oo. i _:� t l' i 1 E Z .2G ctrz I,. \ . i R ,;.:... / I �; r r APPROVEb y JC`GAI.� I,1 �;,.I�►"h_t A��j: I c.ONINQ --�-�� .- •r �i.. t a 9t , }I,�I,.ic r F C ,' ' , I 4n•'IrMA , f%2�3-r�r91 , 3, D IE. .. .t + , 'Y ,Cal ' a t J' .. ,::,, ...� _ J _ .. ERAGE _ __ �. _,... _.�._ _._ _ , w- __ _ .;; LC7T CUV ""ar.' ! ,.. .,,.. , '. , , : ..,.., : r> ,- , ., r I . a'. -r\ . f '��, - + . , , _ .. . _ __. _ .. _ __ z wyMa+Ut :1.. ) .1 1 ,-..... . , _ - - - - - n -ter.-r 4"SUILDING HEIGHT . ,, r ,, ,... s- .. _ s i •a I. r' ... i_ tab:. ;'+•'s( "� :� i;7 r. SIDEWALKS 1., , i STREET DEQIC/�TION solo I 11A :rr +" I.' i �'• ' �''•'i�f ti '19! "t.".t qla.,, ;f-�.'. ,- �.'t i 1 , t /1� 4A :, k.3 1 :i. }c J .i, •.IJ,'i d 3 a I Io \ a `3' 0 �, SUBUIVISIUN REQ r ;,; ;€ ,a� ., o, I t l B c. s � x Ix U, >3° i w; t►�c.. .. ',.'1'� h116-1,•,b..l i•� 1 l'4.. rk,Y.ty 'e:•1^i !' c.i: ',r'!,•: ,k: .:( 'T1' iL r.d. �: ! ,:ill'. LL�� 4'-: 'id ''7. �Gi. y ,. ., 5'}., ,'. fi'..,- _.� �.r 1 S i C' . y.. . �"'c,'+'tA. w .Qu, :`f,Y T",. x /+ x .,'Y .,.1:{ .1 d > % tf., . o ,3` f r,,, ,i; /;^ r c• tr. 7J i�. C .�t: ' a .� L I , \.., MSI�r� k 9 E C.S ,�•, v :'=' _-_ ,- I r, WETSAIa S ATEMEN .: r `, e P I 1.. ;f _�._ ... ,,_ r—V r .,h. n.x is s .�,l x:'.,, , ; rs _% s _ r�1 ".% 3.., f t1. r.. GUEST HOUSE STATE[1hEN'f:, �. ::i `� l; ' f Ott i i �d e t' I ,., II betta , .: + IWf17ti ,, "" �r, , i ••,p,p� �.� x .,.'.�'" - . -- - - _—._._ . ..._ ! �"'' S 't"+•", _s.,t ,µ. �t :iS .ir?;,Jl - . ,:%,, .. �% f ..ff i+,, 1 61i 1. FLOOD AREA • , • Y . , ,t . i ✓ .� ' ..__,!_ __. �1A 4' is _ t I rah �t' • • �h _... ... _ _. _ _-� _ —k /mil / - t - OTHER i +' '. . i - - , ` ; _ '---•___....-,...--._-__..-__-.-.•_._.___.. _.__ _.._t_ ; tart faawrc vtr>f�n tc, t :'e , N CA +►r4arn . �, . . r I • ; / 11 n ' y , :% I p19RAf / A= OK t•OW L heat IAAAMC OR 10VAR L . 1 f: �.tt �L.�I. ....,_..._ _.>,_ .... .---_ ,.._�.__....__...1----a•- _.._.._I . .. .. — - Ei _.. _. I I/ SrAALfS OR 1"Ar/h9cs _ ;' 7g0 iI �Y 1 i � . - - _.-... X [ST GtZ1�►f '" -_ .. _ '"' �I �t�s 'GIs. I , 1, 170 45.8E a� c ry .-- -- ', . . , �. ro err . , _..--,_.. _..- _ ........ _ _ .._ ,...._e'.GTI"'6,.t�. 44j=...__-_..r ....:..;.. - - - __._... _ .._. _.._. —76� _ fl V u.u: A r R ,� - 41 I h f/ t {1 _- I _ i r. "�,{ d 11 .a R "l�!t ** zl� 6+fAtAIL ' _».o-o it1 1 ; �� II �. 5fi•t��"-r►4. DIGI�1 SS t / N (- .----._..._ ---...._ . S _ 7, - 4- r _ ..� ._ _ __ ..._.... , Rd 1* iZ r p' /a 1€S .. S 1 1 Cafe �,// - --. �.___.._..-- 36r Si GM& X -301 0 if. • '. 1� +o' t'lfa� f 1#U.•.!#IE "77 { . Ga )U4 -'IC _ . - //,. .-.. .. — rtJF �_•,,, lYtOl.. r"f313 .•.1'•.'••.+••.• ''If .,.••:,...•., .I ? Ir 1 1.. .. _ / ... .__ i _ it I 11 1 ft �.•. • • . � r. • • . • • • • . • • • . • • ..'' ' • • • • , • 'i • • • � • • I .... � .��, ' i♦ _ ;r.-.i�Y,ii 6U Eo r�kAC>E it _ i 1 //I - i :r i ' d'. e;' R WHt_• ' i} 74 . o Q " �„ I I /%/, i Y lhtir lstt%Ie ar,i ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL _�s_t, i ----- ;,�,' m, ,-__._-�- _ iC 3rFCL .,EIv<Ea�srs Y . M N I r' _, ._._r.. _..... .. Si~ /�lJE= - - �l a„wi, se o.C. f r SC PVC __ ..... _.-... i S I o r ° r h140 f t 20 . , ,4 t -tt� E L E VAT ION SECT`/QII( "' '. I , A'. , SDR 35 (ASTM D3034) . r/� n� C t a1t-Sfi lr^F_.,.. .... •r. ,,,�'�'!4" ,� { i'•'•: r' t a,I,f� �, _,f.o q.)•k' r `t�l,�`�`'y' SILT FENCE DET`A1L , / - ," .i ( :�'�' i,t Ft1-__-.—'--. — - ..`_... _.,.. .._ter �_. --.. �. •y•, rhea `..t s• i' .. .... ..... .... ' .. . , . .. _ .. .-.••-7D. 0 ISiIM� - - "-' ` ' �� °k ii _ ' ' '_� _ .1 : 1 I,"" w � i„i` �, ,#� , , CI dF I-1 '� :, + 10 - � "M"A of , •/ Ef r,,hl t ?h; !'Js"sty®Jc' EROSION SEO11ttNTAT1ON-�tfS I riNb t t'";i` '`` ~ , u I rwt c ) y'ik �'� f st ; a ,; EUILLlNG DL�F'ARTNIE r ,Y. •r;Y �, r WORK g yy . i t 1 tlNJlf s • t W ADDRESS �� /Olo — �. ;., ,__, 1 ��t, -.,' ,1 ' ; t owtkh r. �� ( 1. Ali limits of clearing and e.:has of vegetation preservatton as described on the , fi 1•, +> W a n w, e - M ADOWbbC' ' r II w ev,i ' Rs��'� ' r24¢� OWNER �n plan shall be ciearly flagged in the Held and observed during construction• --- ---ter+ ... ,. ,:.t4 }* •. ,•��. ...,+y ''!"11 �r .{ - ( .. r h�`,4 4..i.f'.1.•l: r", `8•3W r;•"' e" , A 2. All required sedimentation/erosion tontrol fac11IN es must be constructed and a IRa in operation prior to land clearing and/or other .construction to insure that j I " `' "` ur ( i ~` r s s � nx. v / f<t. �JRH t+,1` APPROVED DAl"E. .. ,. `'.t ,x : + ��, ,,,r, f ti,:, , sediment laden water does not enter the natural drainage system. All erosion , ', on ti r , 1., I tp. I t.,... • �� t '` Y BLDG.OFFICIAL and sediment tacilities shall be maintaineq in b satisfactory condition until . SrL-.GAAt6- -- k ' 1'` ZA - such time that clearing and/or construction 1s completed and potential for, ' r Lf' S s BEd 11d i2 Z, , r a``1 'ro, `� I._. on -site erosion has passed. , the implementation, maintenance; replacement end ' . ` ' :';. ' h Q "` '`''�±N''" additions to erosion/sedimentation control systems shall be the responsiblllt ` t. ,� i�� ` LiNED CONS�'� �. PERMIT M U M B E R Dr the permitted. y .�,A0WN" i , � r M � ASP+ I�VHt,.------•-..-- ' 1 "�1�. ' TRANCE . _ _ _ _ D' �� The erosion and sedimentation control systems depicted on this drawing bee �, j' I 3� 1e w -1 --- . y y ,. y;' _ a - �' �r, -"r' ,� t� � ,! �' ?µ` t \ 3. intended to be minimum requirements to meet antltipated Site conditions, As + - - I' 1'; ft"" e!a , j '_ :.._..... J °` 1�4G�TE �L-1` P2UP�te construction progresses and unexpetted or Seasonal,tondttionS dictate, the ; I'� sw 11 1 ,, w� �.� permittee should anticipate that•more erosion and kedimentatioo tontrol �} " ) _ ;i facilities will be necessary to insure complete siitatlon tontrol tin the Ya' " ` r >rr o f `� �� T ` -� I ( ST- PIZbP'E' - uw• - --- roposed site. Durin the course of construction it shall be the obli ation :': + • t'R l ! . t �' %� Est PRt71�t✓t"t� t L NE S P g g �I a> 1, , 00Q 11_1 ` / �� O and resp0nsibility of the permittee to address any new conditfoht that may be >: A k. ' In Cq) # 4 GJ0i' :a - •'� A ',,e ll _ created by his activities and to provide additional facilities, fiver and above '' f6.IS• ;i :'L I • 1 K v J l 'r 1 - - --- " 7}� l r f _ rd %�I01° t � � ri.:., d i+ir if . ,ww r :.� eu Q 11 �If fl 1 1 j .. - - minimum requirements, 6s may be needed to protect adjbcent properties and triter / . 11 I 11 fl I , qua ty of the receiving drainage system. q� . "- is f E Any disturbed area which has been stripped of vegetation and where no further ' 4 VII. I ': ,�, _ work is anticibated for a period of 30 days or more must be imrnrediately ar >!.r��ts.• __� _��,____� � . �,,.�� -' stabili2ed with mulching, grass planting or other approved erosion control Mp gCfs,L� mot. I',, ott+1.x1 , , .. 7o•0 . . i I' treatment applicable to the time Df year,in question. Grass epding alone will i o1'I �_�_.--- be acceptable only during the months of April thru.September ntlusijve. :;�i Seeding may proceed outsidF the specified dine period whenever . is in the STkijdt IRAI� bt8IiGN' ASSOCIAT8S, iN.C.. l . t''�r'� / the permitt but tt me t lc ng4 netting; or VAN , 1/ �.; `r.-,. t _. .:'..t.:.r!% ., I too.p o er reatment approvedeby'Ttl SObI.,S►11Cr.1ti h In ® .: CONSIILtING NNGIN��RS interes a 'hi 4C, •r . - _ . t h t ' 1 At IR, r � 1 N%'� ,(I :198T",- Ti 9,W. G�ftil>i .V ` a tc' alnl Hance ,S E,�,0 r: . lrNNwoAD, W4 c90�b 5 r I _ _ +. !l. 1 Q - o��l �6^j t rlj.oW'�:Riti9I s�b•ia3e .. S it fencer tnd f liter Oerrlers !hell 11e iitspeefed la;.edletaly altar 'f'i+ . _ _ �.__ - t 50.0 loch of nd UO. 1 ; . > ,. r11 .II a it iodic Jitir,rinY ProlunJrU r11n1�11. ArtSr �t, li . �'��{ . „-^r- requlrrJ rtpalti {hell ite Shade teihcdlilely: t�•�'�,; � (�,� i r :' ,;��A r�i,�l;�5, l,,s I' tt�..;�ll fi,, .:N " ,tiX �-- r ,:,,. !. Slluuld tAe,lebrlt on a sill line! br ilittr ierrlir detaepolt Or ` i � 3 ... 0 J is n NCi .. ... .. :., ,, „ ., :„ ,.- * t l ;� ---- �•l o Ot9 NO.,, .::. t:, D R A W 3 Lrtwlt Ineffretirt prl0r to tht end Of the lief icd yf�41 d ,,, 4..;., �. 4 a Ilfe.bnd, �*:,,, ,';! k a Urler ►lt I p 1 e Celt er h s6 SA ,y at.y f r ,*� zt. r ,:, th D 1 yS t t,.f rlt Illil! itt itehlal.td )frflstgllyl U,�. `o+site E.. 4. Ir`! t94s'i - ?k w� p ', ' 'S,tt t 1 .1. .. e , ).y , 1•. - I '' a l _ r ., 1! , i .I' r : E , t" i . . ;,`t:• t , ,<,�+it �. kdl.cnt tie outs thoulJ k fu•oveti Titer Itch ('ri en r �,� l t. „",> <i P fl t o tv t: Ihky t�' L orslaN I`I } 1 ,.,,' �, I. N, NA 7 •, w, t r x .. .7ti. _ 3 0. ry,. I i' h �. L' •,- - ; ; a' OJ 1, h ,t , ?3 O sl lie rviu td r .n fir Os+it rtaob i r All• t lW : ,: _ v t IN o e ne h hi %tbcy , , ��1i`I� ;;`: I. elr 1►t�e�hill t xl>I fE :y,,, ' `, , .,. of tilt berrl�r' i r N: I'• i;' ,: �; y., /'� � aA7E: /t: 4. M seditaenf do tit/ rta.itrltn {n' ieu J/ttr tht lit"ne r r t' . s G .'...c... . i -- -f I- ,},,. +... , y Pa 9 / 1 r t 0 µ i :: � >,, Illtcr Garrltr i'nu tad tr 14• utr J f f� ;r lJ. .' 1 J I i f ha) l be drisil d to tunfdi�r' gg 4 t OF.,. , f F'.;...:,... rlth iha tallllnl ofadt. Nrellal'ti eh,d etrdtd, 7 Yt jj: is , .. .. a h, S r y. ;:y ' r I, i ,fit-t I �: _'•� r�T �J. `� IZ ot.: "a. :. r+., , ! .#; f' ,,'t- . ( 4I, t ,t,, , F . -x., ,T,. -4 t _ I t '-il' ., b d- ! ''.'l., i TB/14 fx. ssMH #4 Al. RIM = 48. 79 /NV. = 44,95 CTR. DATUM C/TY OF EOMONOS CAP C. S. 419345 NOT FND. -� l i � EX. DECK EX RESIDENCE OINNERSH/P L/NE PER SCC # zG9S9 FND. DAY74IR43eO COMC. MON 0vv�, ^G 7ET 882410 v I 1s 8ti29rp40 10 20 yo s L E 15761 6 Ao ol 1, Q14 FND, /2,RZW,4tf /1' 870�5-14,3 23 . 87 (R I .+--1 j.•----. g LSD SD SD g �jSD _._. EX. CB'�2 N • ra,- =29. i/vV = 25.13 : 7 8 SEC. MR. NOT FOUND EX • SSMy #.5 N RiM = 49 28 /tVV = 42.26 CT9- - No TES f) THE 90U1V0,41eY Z . EX/ST 17o=5E 5110WIV AR,5 0,45ED UPON RECOIP.UED S&RVEYS- F/LED UrVDElf' 1/OZ. 22 OF S!/.eVEyS, P6. 2-0 4N.0 Mdc-' V0L . /8 OF SC/,PYEY.5, /"h S. /02 O 10.3, ,E'ECOR,05 of 5NO1vOMis1/ CMN7Y, w,9. 2) (R)-r RKP8001rg f WCOPO IOF 5upvfY p157,41CZ"S 5HO WAI /IV VOL. 22, /DO.24 3) [ ©T /O, BLOOff 60) PLOT OF ME"DOW,0AL C 6CACY TO PL AT THEREOF RL-colDFD I N Vol— 5 OP PLA T5, PAGE .38, . RECOR/J S OF SNOf/OM/S1/ C061iV7y ,5yCEPT THAT POR710 I TH&-REOF LYING IVORTff OF CERTAIN FEIVCE AS DESCTi/8E0 /iV M,41, 3 , 1929, IN SURER/DF? COURT C,4Y,5L" NO. 26959 70GE7-1IE-R W/Ty VACATED SFAVI,4-W 4vZ-NoC LyINO //,o CENT rases- 68.69' ,n,V� s4.o4%T/ MAI 63. U2 t%N/ N 57° 354s3'•W NOT OfEN� N FND. X2 "REBAR o LEGEND O SET �a REE3AR � r r, o r� I I ! I I I i I I I I 2p FX.C,8*3 T©P = 8/ iivvrNv) = 74.23 !NV (5) = 74.3I JNV 00 = 74. 43 INV (E) = 7720 ffVD . 4 x 4 CONC. MON. W12 " BRASS CAP /N M/P a MAY 141300 pERM11 COUNTER Fd'. eI6 67,06el?7- 16340 � 75 1�; f.-Z. MAY 14 1 31'N PERDAIT COUNTER