17806 OLYMPIC VIEW DR.PDF17806 OLYMPIC
VIEW DR
ADDRESS: I jgO�p
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL #:
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE) #:
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS #: 'POO9 — 9 ?/ DETERMINATION: ❑. Conditional Waiver Study Required ❑ Waiver
CRITICAL AREAS #: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: pL,0 ypj 0 —1 ol (-Yee rem o\fa I )
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORD FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER — list permit #'s):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
LOT:
BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE/ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
L:\TEMP\DST's\Forms\Jana's Street File Checklist 5-14-08.doc
VV "I`i
�6
L
L
po Act --�-�
VA
24 HR. WrICE RE
CL w FOR I pir-cTloh S-
A.
m
• e •
r of" �EIV GE-
OWNER/CONT TOR IS RESPON IRLE
FOR EROSION CO ROL AND DAM GE -
�.Fevice, 3 g I �'-
S'D�i�'/�}�.6C
0
ESUB
�f1
J L 022 100
Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to - ® ��
utilities or frontage Improvements in City BUILDING DEPAR MENT
right-of-way per C+ty standards that is cause E CITY OF EbMONbs,
or occurs during the permitted project.
FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5 h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
'')C. 189NJ
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location: 17806 Olympic View. Drive Tax Acct. Number: 00513100016105
Determination: STUDY REQUIRED '; 'File Number: CRA20090092
Owner: Hasim Mujkanovic Applicant: Same
Background:..
During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain (or be adjacent to)
critical areas, including Geologically Hazardous Areas (Erosion Hazard Area and Landslide Hazard
Area), pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Geologically
hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological events.
They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of
significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase
the hazard to surrounding development and use.
The LiDAR map (attached) indicates that there is a steep slope (approximately 41 %) just east of the house
(10'/24'). The site is comprised of a rolling slope of 26-27% across the entire property rolling from west to
east. The western half of the property is primarily forested with mature evergreens, which should enhance
slope stability. Soils on the property are identified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam series, which
classifies the site as a potential erosion hazard. The slopes present above 15% qualify as potential
"geologically hazardous areas."
This review applies to the entire subject parcel. Depending on the location and project proposed
relative to the identified critical areas, certain studies and reports may be required. Please contact
the Planning Division at 425.771.0220 if/when you have a specific development proposal for this site
to discuss the various permits that will be required, including a tree cutting permit
Mr. Mujkanovic asked about the possibility of removing trees in the back yard in order to build a smoke
house for curing meats as part of a proposed home occupation.
Please be aware that building permits are required for building an accessory building. A home occupation
permit (business license) is required by the City Clerk's office for running a home -based business. The
home occupation code does not allow customers or employees to visit the property. Also, home
occupations shall not produce odors or smoke or other impacts adverse to a residential area. Please
review the attached home occupation handout (ECDC 20.20) for further details.
Please be aware that tree removal on sites containing a critical area require a tree cutting permit prior to
removal. Also, a tree cutting permit would be required due to the large size of the property per ECDC
18.45.030.A (0.65 acres in the RS-8 zone). As part of a tree cutting permit, a licensed geotechnical
engineer would need to determine that the slope would remain stable if the trees were removed and
Page 1 of 4
discuss the po a ial for replacement trees. Below you will find the specific critical areas code that must be
complied with regarding removal and replacement of trees in critical areas (ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.B).
The City's Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies for vegetation that will be considered with any
tree cutting proposal. Below you will find some goals and policies related to tree removal and tree retention
in Edmonds.
ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.b. The removal of trees from critical areas and buffers that are hazardous, posing a
threat to public safety, or posing an_imminent risk of damage to private property; provided, that:
i. The applicant submits a report from an ISA- or ASCA-certified arbodst or registered landscape architect.
that documents the hazard and provides a replanting schedule for the replacement trees;
ii. Tree cutting shall be limited to pruning and crown thinning, unless otherwise justified. by a qualified
professional. Where pruning or crown thinning is not sufficient to address the hazard, trees should be
removed or converted to wildlife snags;
iii. All vegetation cut (tree stems, branches, etc.) shall be left `within the critical area or buffer unless removal
is warranted due to the potential for disease or pest transmittal to other healthy vegetation or unless
removal is warranted to improve slope stability;
iv. The land owner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees of a ratio of two replacement
trees for each tree removed (two to one) within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan:
Replacement trees may be planted at a different, nearby location if it can be determined that planting in the
same, location would create a new hazard. or potentially damage the critical area. Replacement trees shall
be species that are native and indigenous to the site and a minimum of one inch in diameter at breast .
height (dbh).for deciduous trees and a.minimum of six feet in height for evergreen trees as measured from
the top of the root ball;
v. If a tree to be. removed provides critical habitat, suchas an eagle perch, a qualified wildlifebiologist,shall`
be consulted to determine timing and methods of removal thatwill minimize impacts; and
vi. Hazard trees determined to pose an imminent threat or danger to public.health or.safety, to public or
private property, or of serious environmental degradation may be removed or pruned by the land owner
prior to receiving writtenapproval from the city; provided, that within 14 days following such action, the land
owner shall submit a restoration plan that demonstrates compliance with the provisions of this title;
Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element)
"The removal of trees should be minimized particularly when they are located on steep slopes or
hazardous soils. Subdivision layouts, buildings and roads should be designed so that existing trees are
preserved.`
"Natural vegetation should be preserved whereverpossible to reduce erosion and stabilize slopes,
particularly on the downhill property line.
"Woodlands help stabilize soils on steep slopes, and act as barriers to wind and sound. Natural
vegetation provides habitat for wildlife. Plants 'replenish the soil with nutrients.. They generate oxygen
and clean pollutants from the air.
`Grading should be restricted to building pads and roads only. Vegetation outside these areas should
be preserved."
For all of the reasons above, tree removal on this property is not encouraged.
Allowed Activities and Exempt Development Proposals...
Page 2 of 4
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.220. Similarly,
certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you
have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed or exempt activity,
please contact a Planner for more information.
General Critical Areas Report Requirements...
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that
may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting
from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a
critical area the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing
the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific
development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your
specific development application.
• Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC
23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below).
• Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the
ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved list of
consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information.
• General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through
23.40.140.
Study Requirement for Erosion Hazard Areas.:.
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area.
• Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater,
among others.
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A.
• In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical
Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the Geologically Hazardous
Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050.
• Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the director's
discretion. At a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the
requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required.
Development Proposals associated with Erosion Hazard Areas...
Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area and must meet additional criteria.
Page 3 o/ 4
1]
• For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in
compliance ECDC 18.30 will be considered to meet the Critical Areas "Study Required" determination.
The determination of "suitable slope stability" will be made by both the Planning and Engineering
divisions of the City of Edmonds.
• In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a
report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional.
• Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the
ordinance.
• Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D
• Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070.
Study:Requ rement for Landslide Hazard Areas...
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area.
• A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical
relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock).
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B.
• In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical
Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050.
Development Proposals associated with Landslide Hazard Areas:::':
Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer.
• Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer.
• The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced.
• The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per
ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050). The
alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC 23.80.060.
• In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design
standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3.
Gina Coccia Associate Planner December 29 2009
Name, Title Signature Date
Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
Page 4 of
•
•
*;�
CITY OF EDMONDS h'�v�
121 5"' Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.ci.edmo a.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
°C. I89%3
Project:
File Number:
Date of Report:
Reviewed By:
INTRODUCTION
PLANNING DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, & DECISION
Mujkanovic Tree Cutting Permit (CU) at 17806 Olympic View Drive (RS-8).
PLN20100019
June 4, 2010
1 have determined that the application is complete and have reviewed the
TREE CUTTING PERMIT application pursuant to Chapters 18.45, 20.02, 20.05,
and Title 23 of the Edmonds Community Development Code'.
Gina Coccia, Associate Planner
The purpose of the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting chapter (ECDC 18.45) is to provide regulations for the
clearing of and for the protection and preservation of trees and associated significant vegetation. The
site is forested with mature evergreens along the western half with a handful of trees dispersed along
the eastern half where the home and driveway have been constructed (Attachment 3). The owner has
requested to remove 12 evergreen (mostly fir) trees that remain along the eastern half of his property
(Attachment 3). Some are in poor condition, one is completely dead, and most have sparse foliage and
are receiving little light. These trees are labeled "A" through "L" on the enclosed map (Attachment 3)
and are referenced in the attached report by Certified Arborist Anthony Moran of Superior NW Tree and
Shrub Care, Inc. (Attachment 4).
This site is located in a single-family neighborhood in northeast Edmonds. All of the properties in this
neighborhood are also zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-8), whereas the properties across Olympic
View Drive are located within the Lynnwood city limits (Attachment 1). The owner has indicated that
one reason he would like to remove these trees is to eventually construct an accessory building on the
flat portion of the property near the home. A building permit will be required to build an accessory
building, because the property contains and is adjacent to a moderately steep slope (CRA20090092).
Because the owner is proposing to remove trees on or near a slope, a tree cutting permit is required.
Approval of a tree cutting permit requires compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code
(ECDC) Chapters 18.45 (tree cutting), 20.02 (type II permits), 20.05 (conditional use permits), Title 23
(critical areas) and the Comprehensive Plan.
' All Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) citations can be accessed online at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
Mujkanovic Tree Removal
PLN20100019
7FINI�D%IND. CONCLUSIONS
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
a. Request: To remove 12 evergreen trees on a residential property (Attachments 2 and 3).
b. Review Process: Administrative conditional use (CU) permit "Type II" decision subject to ECDC
20.02. Planning staff reviews the project and issues a decision.
2.
c. Owner/Applicant: Hasim Mujkanovic (Attachment
2).
d. Tax Parcel Number: 00513100016105.
e. Location: 17806 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds WA
98026 (Attachment 1).
f. Zoning: Single -Family Residential (RS-8).
g. Acreage / Square Footage: Approximately 0.65
acres or 28,314 square feet (Attachment 3).
h. Existing Use: One single-family residential home.
i. Proposed Use: No change — proposal is for tree removal only.
j. Shoreline Management: The site is not subject to Shorelines of the State regulations.
k. SEPA: The proposal is not subject to review under the State Environmental Policy Act.
I. Comprehensive Plan Designation: "Single Family — Urban 1."
m. Access / Street: Olympic View Drive is considered a "Minor Arterial' and provides access to the
property via an existing driveway.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
This application was reviewed by the Fire District, Building Division, Engineering Division, Parks and
Recreation Department, and the Public Works Department. The Engineering Division provided
comments which include the condition that all work take place on private property, including the staging
of equipment for tree removal (Attachment 5).
3. APPLICATION AND STAFF REVIEW COMPLIANCE (ECDC 20.02 and ECDC 18.45)
This application is processed pursuant to ECDC 20.02 ("Type II" staff decision with notice required). A
complete application was received on May 7, 2010 and notice was published/posted/mailed on May 12,
which satisfies the requirements of ECDC 20.02. No written public comments were received.
4. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE
Page 82-83 of the Comprehensive Plan discusses goals and policies for vegetation and wildlife, including
the following:
B.2. The removal of trees should be minimized particularly when they are located on steep slopes
or hazardous soils...
B.3. Trees that are diseased, damaged, or unstable should be removed.
B.4. Grading should be restricted to building pads and roads only. Vegetation outside these areas
should be preserved.
Page 2 of 5
Mujkanovic Tree Removal
PLN20100019
Most of the trees proposed to be removed are not on the steepest portion of the property: All of the
trees proposed to be removed are damaged or diseased in some way, according to the arborist report.
No grading is proposed. The trees in the western portion of the property, well outside the building
footprint and road, will be preserved. The proposal appears to be in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
S. CRITICAL AREAS COMPLIANCE (ECDC Title 23)
File CRA20090092 found that critical areas (geologically hazardous areas) exist on and adjacent to the
property. Because there are slopes on the property, a tree cutting permit is required. ECDC
23.40.220(C)(7) describes allowed activities in critical areas, such as select vegetation removal. It says
that "tree cutting shall be limited to pruning and crown thinning, unless otherwise justified by a qualified
professional. Where pruning or crown thinning is not sufficient to address the hazard, trees should be
removed or converted to wildlife snags." It goes on to say that, "the land owner shall replace any trees
that are removed with new trees with a ratio of two replacement trees for each tree removed within one
year in accordance with an approved restoration plan." In this case, the arborist suggest each tree is
hazardous in some way, and that replacement should be through transplanting existing tress that are
not receiving enough light from the dense canopy on the west side of the property to available room on
the east side of the property. Because there are so many existing trees onsite, the arborist feels that the
functions and values of the tree cover could be made up by transplanting some of the existing saplings.
In this way, proposal generally complies with the intent of the critical areas code (Title 23) in that it
would be also saving saplings that are not receiving enough light and allowing them to flourish
elsewhere on the property.
6. PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
a. The proposal is to remove 12 evergreen trees (mostly fir) that are in a weakened condition or
dying. Most appear to be struggling to survive due to lack of light. The arborist notes that the
lot is heavily wooded and that there are numerous evergreen saplings available onsite for
transplant, and that no additional trees should be brought onsite for replacement purposes.
This recommendation was made because the existing mature trees are so plentiful and provide
too much shade for new trees to grow. Some existing saplings have been recommended to be
transplanted onsite which would encourage their growth and help make up for the trees that
will be removed.
b. The trees will be removed using "low impact hand techniques" (rigging, brushing, and chunking)
and no heavy equipment is proposed to be taken off of paved surfaces. This will limit any
detriment to the site and adjacent sites.
c. The brush is proposed to be chipped and the chips will be used as mulch. The consulting arborist
feels that the removal of the slated 12 trees will have minimal impact on the surrounding
environment, slope stability and no detrimental impact to the immediate tree canopy.
d. Tree "L" is considered dead and may therefore be removed immediately.
e. The applicant has requested the removal be phased — some trees removed in 2010, some in
2011, and the remainder in 2012 (Attachment 3). This approach is acceptable (as long as the
dead tree is removed immediately so as not to cause harm or damage property).
f. Trees that will be transplanted on site should be transplanted during each phase of removal and
inspections should occur after each phase of removal and transplantation to ensure that the
transplanted trees are healthy and thriving.
Page 3 of 5
•
Mujkanovic Tree Removal
PLN20100019
g. The majority of the trees on site are being retained; the trees proposed to be removed are
reasonably necessary to achieve the proposed future accessory building while making room for
the transplanted saplings to flourish. Due to the sheer volume of trees onsite, the trees are
being retained to the maximum extent feasible.
h. Although slopes are present onsite (26-41%), no wetlands or streams were observed
(CRA20090092).
i. Trees along the western half of the property will be retained, which will contribute to noise and
wind protection as well as continue to reduce air pollution by producing pure oxygen from
carbon dioxide.
The proposal, with conditions, -is found to be compliant with ECDC Chapters 18.45, 20.02, 20.05, Title 23,
and the Comprehensive Plan.
DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments to this. report, the following decision is
issued by the City of Edmonds Planning Division. The Tree Cutting permit as proposed is APPROVED
with the following conditions:
1. All work shall take place on private property, including the staging of equipment for tree removal.
2. Low impact development techniques shall be used: no heavy equipment shall be taken off paved
surfaces and hand techniques shall be implemented.
3. Tree removal shall be preformed by a Certified Arborist and shall follow the recommendations of
the arborist report submitted by Superior NW Tree & Shrub Care, Inc. (Attachment 4).
4. The evergreen saplings referenced in the arborist report shall be transplanted onsite in lieu of tree
replacement (Attachment 4).
S. At the owner's request, tree removal may be phased so that trees A, B, C, and D may be removed
in 2010, trees L, E, K and H may be removed in 2011, and trees 1, I, G, and F may be removed_ in
2012. Tree L should be removed immediately, however, because the arborist feels it is dead.
6. The owner shall call the Planning Division at 425.771.0220 and request an inspection once each
phase of work has been completed (including transplanting) so that we may close out this file.
Transplanting replacement trees shall be done within one year of each phase of tree removal.
7. The owner shall pay the remaining balance ($33.88) from publishing this file's notice in the Everett
Herald at his earliest convenience (Attachment 6).
APPEALS AND RECONSIDERATIONS:
Any person wishing to file or respond to an appeal should immediately contact the Planning Division at
425.771.0220 for procedural information. Pursuant to ECDC 18.45.060, "Any person aggrieved by the
decision of the staff regarding a clearing permit may appeal such decision to the hearing examiner within
10 working days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall comply with the provisions of Chapter20.06
ECDC." Therefore, appeals (including the $365 appeal fee) must be received by the Planning Division no
later than 4:00 PM on June 18, 2010.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL:
Page 4 of 5
Mujkanovic Tree Removal
PLN20100019
Tree removal requests are processed as administrative conditional use permits, and ECDC 20.05.020(C)
states, "Unless the owner obtains a building permit... within one year from the date of approval, the
conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an
extension of time before the expiration date."
NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR:
The property owner may, as a result of the decision rendered by the staff, request a change in the
valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office.
PARTIES OF RECORD:
Hasim Mujkanovic
17806 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds WA 98026
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Zoning & Vicinity Map
2. Land Use Application
3. Site Plans & Schedule of Purpose
4. Arborist Report
5. Department Memo
6. Public Notice Documentation
Planning Division
Engineering Division
Page 5 of 5
•
•
�f! � N p �p -
o oo� 692 91 v� 00 oNo 1760 761 i 0. �7 08
O m
O co
1761 fit 761
00 7631
MQU�� = Sys 6? �1762 r� 2
1762 � �' w 17631 76�3 63
1763 >
1763 -
p c p ON Q ��0 1770 ¢ 17703 1 05
ti 1
700f 17709 1770
N OO 7002 ti p N N M 1. c�
p � ti ti ti 17626 �- 7 2' • 1 7
1771
l�
c17804o o17803
^ 17806 co
17812 17811 1 80
7003
T 17820 17819 182 17810
7014 7006
17826. 17825 ?$24
1"- 7012
7008 17902 w 17901
702 r�ty�iO f7908 7904 N 1.7910
�E,Cii11�011.C�S24 m 7919 o 0 o
�o
►� �• ►� 17930 c° W co cc o 00 40
__ 180TH S�1 S W
ao W p 18020 180151801
ti CD
p tO 18024 80 7800. 0 00
6926 18019 78
ryh o 802 . 18007 �? ,1
803 w 7�0 80
,
9lipC►ty of
18102 �, � ynn�nrood
2 ►gyp„ 1g104 �cp _ ST ST SW
8107
i
`'.0 Hasim Mujkanovic Tree Cutting Permit site Attachment 1
Conditional Use Permit (CU) "'—"'' Zonin /Vicini Ma
File Number PLN20100019 �,_„_,! City Limits g 2 P
17806 Olympic View Drive RS-8 Zone 0 100 200 Feet
( ) �� RS-8 Zone i
•
city of edmonds
land use application.
0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
0 HOME OCCUPATION
0 FORMAL SUBDIVISION
0 SHORT'SUBDIVISION.
e LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
0 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT'
0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDM-ENT
0 STREET VACATION
e REZONE
0 SHORELINE PERMIT
0 VARIANCE /,"REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION
OTHER: 7�Iy k �i.�nL1_C)PT tlY1��
FILE T. PL4;f;00 ° 1.9- ZONE
DATE `0-' 3 `�. I U REND BY N
FEE` '3'!5-- RECEIPT#L'flLA `t
HEARING,DATE'
e HE STAFF a PB a ADB, a CC
PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION �7RDlO /lfiYJ_%Ji4Cr Veto /✓rrlwi
PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE)
PROPERTYOwNER JyGIS/l7� fT l�U{7 ov,'n Pxgir2 R
ADDRESS'
E-MAILADDRESS GOVQ.1:5c�suvneC'hofrnai/.C�r�,.F�x_
TAX ACCOUNT.# QU7 ) 131 QI)C I &1 Q5 SEC. T RNG'.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED.USE JZ&°MOL'(r % t�i'r �Y'✓ P
APPLICANT fad iM e,- Q b G? bew, PHONE
ADDRESS
E=MAIL ADDRESS - 'FAX #
CONTACTPERSONJAGEh"I, 'JGi.I'!7G Y1.5 Q�7C7yCJ - - - PHONE#
ADDRESS
E-MAIL ADDRESS-
FAx #
The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in .consideration on. the, processing of the:application.
agrees to release, utdernriify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including,
reasonable attorneys fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole :or part upon. false, :misleading,
inaccurate or incompleteInformation furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By.my-signature, I certi.frthat the information -and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my:
knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application- on the -behalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTIAGENT DATE
Property Owner's Authorization
By my.signatuze, I cer* -that I have authorize'. the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use
application, and grant my permission for the public officials and. the staff of the City. of Edmonds to enter the subject
property for the purposes of inspection and posiin attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER , f `� " �N l ��� DATE
This application form was revised on 1/27/00. To verify whether it is still current, call (425) 711-0220.
TTACHMFNT 2
L:\LL3KA1(YV'LANN4Nuv0rrM
PLN20100019
•
•
i
418
0
n
o
�o
RECEIVED N Z
APR 19 2010
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER
Olymplc View Drive
382
ATTACHMENT 3
PLN20100019
TI I�
X ID
F i
�2 2
4z
- i
� f
r J 16 5 -ro g AQ
`� 90 /.o22
S�X
0
i RFX o
Po Ae-k
----- - y
I SEA
i
RECE'ME® C 1 �41.
APR 19 2 10 I I
DEVELOPMENT S RVICES
COUNTER
3rU � J
SdDF(09 A
ek ATFK' i2
,--, 7— A4:W H M-E T 3 7—
PLN20100019
Ar7-;9 r
Z-
v A 6e reut oV, S'� ALP �li�iYt� lfi�Y
and wcof C i-u q e kl
04r14/,& rew eve G✓.ec0 c(,q- cs-, -Le� CZ--0 p �o
Qh,Y' W-q1-eta' l ;,7-e .
J
ti
D4 se Q .Y C C,;(
RECEIVED
APR 19 2010
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER
A.e ",c-o 1/e 7 <1.7 Cis 0 d?
/ Y qy
17-4
V-(` lZetu-oll-ed ('q le�eolz4
p
/.2
7Z/"ee-Y S i"74f,A TT CH Vcy
Gee,04
•
0.
Met)
Feb.r"ey 24, 2010
1
Project 'Re noyie residence;
y1upi 6 6 d !Con6cjA1iisijii Mujkan6vit� 17806 01 Vi v%, Qii'vejL nJon. s WA 98026
I Ph6ne: 42-5, 7 61 634U' .- Email'=-clb er5wsame@.hotrii6ilxorh
moh&,
121 5'' Avenue K 2 1W Floor Edmonds WA .98020'
Phone =425 7710226 exi IM Email'. eoixia@6.edjnonds.,Wa.us'1
Methods; 717he following trees -.will bd removed using low impact hatid tcchniL qu::§'nciUd rig
rigging, brushing, and chunkingi No heavy equipment.will be taken -off of paved surfaces:zllie
brush chipped and I the chips used is'niul .1 ch. , The removal of the trees will
ill have minimal
imO4061, the surrounding ,environs, no impact .u,iislope liability','u-nd nodetrimental effecto"n
the immediate &0 canopy:
P-iott;, 'Ibis is fl. large, Heavily wooded property that makes up the north end of asmall
forest complex.. The first's6t bf trees that -are to be _removed (A, B, and C),4r-c- not part of the
lbrest sv9tem. OhiV.6he is in ,the back ofthe home, -the other two stand alone in ffoiicrfie'`D'
cedar will most
9t likely
kely be remo-ved'ai atiater-date and it is,als6not part of the,system . The
remaining ones ure understoty.trees in poor condition that haveteen subordlnated: These Also'
will prolbqbly,be. r6movied'at a layer- da'te.'
Each .of the trees in the fbllo%Vir g list Was:ikfi mcasur6d At thestAnda6d heightof541" above
grade (DSH),.afid,'theirjiei,ghts, approkimat6d,. They are,de'sighated oh ih,c ic.c6nipanyin. g'p lot
plan.s with blu'e circles.
1 incliiie behind the
A) Pir-T)" D8H; 96"ttall. This'tree 'is staiidingjTiidway� up f1'6' home
on the n' th,si I de. It is in dedlin'c and is, symptpiiiiitic of Armillar , i
. Pr . - - 1 .1 .. I q.,
j) Fir, 28" DSH,'95 `tall sianding 17 to the left of the, driveway at the NE cprriet_of the
priboetty. Client is concekrkdWitb proixiniity of roots to drive and to waket nigin
%Vhidh `appears tO iUn..6l but fiVe FCO out alQngl� the. south WI6 of the tree. He
Flacc # 01 WA �',-6072 NO 56P6 NV4ioc
net
P.�"51�0-57z+ ATTACHMENT 4
�
PLN20100019
C) Fir with dual stems 22" and 17" DSH, 95' tall just southwest of the tree above. The
client is concerned with this tree's proximity to his septic system which is centered
15' to the south.
D) Cedar, codominant from the 6' mark, 23" and 24" Cal stems, 65' tall standing in the
driveway 18' north of house, 10' west of garage. Tree has an active tear plane from
the base to the separation point. Tree is buttressing but does have decay down center
of plane.
E) Fir 4" DSH, 32' tall rear right side 3' from the north fence line in the middle level.
Tree is subordinated by larger firs within 5' to either side and is in advanced decline.
F) Fir 6" DSH, 36' tall standing right of center in the upper plateau. Tree is subordinated
and exhibiting symptoms of decline including sparse foliage and poor color.
G) Fir 5" DSH, 45' tall standing left of center in the upper plateau. Tree is subordinated
and exhibiting symptoms of decline including sparse foliage and poor color.
H) Fir 6" DSH, 40' tall standing left of center in the upper plateau 8' east of `G'. Tree is
subordinated and exhibiting symptoms of decline including sparse foliage and poor
color.
1) Madrone 10" DSH, 38' tall, 6' spread standing 10' south of `G' and `H' on the upper
plateau. This tree has a large basal wound that extends two thirds around its
circumference. There is active decay in the wound that was probed to more than half
way through the diameter.
J) Madrone 12" DSH, 50' tall, 8' spread standing 20' north of the south fence line on
the middle plateau. This tree has a basal wound that is one third of its circumference.
There is active decay in the wound that was probed to more than half way through the
diameter.
K) Fir 5" DSH, 38' tall standing 15' south of `J' 4' north of the south fence line. Tree is
subordinated and exhibiting symptoms of decline including sparse foliage and poor
color.
L) Fir 7" DSH, 55' tall standing 30' north of the south fence line 10' west of the edge of
the middle plateau. Tree is dead.
As this lot is heavily wooded and there are numerous evergreen saplings available for transplant
no additional trees should be brought to the site for replacement purposes.
1 3 1 1 O NE 1 77'6 Place #304 * Woodinville, WA )8072
206-930-5724
5uPerior_NW@comcast.net
ATTACHMENT 4
PLN20100019
Superior NW Tree and Shrub Care, Inc is the first company in the State of Washington to be
Accredited by the Tree Care Industry Association. We are members of the International Society
of Arboriculture, the American Society of Consulting Arborists, the Better Business Bureau, the
Master Builders Association, and the Association of Washington Businesses. Our company
specializes in tree preservation, focusing on promoting health, preventing decay, and improving
aesthetics. We have five ISA certified arborists on staff, a Certified Tree Risk Assessor, and a
Certified Treecare Safety Professional which ensures that our crews are trained to follow both
the ANSI A300 pruning standards and the ANSI Z 133 safety standards.
Anthony Moran
Certified Arborist
ISA #PN-5847A
Certified Tree Risk Assessor
PN-ISA #248
anthony@superiornw.com
206 930 5724
13 1 1 o NE 177`6 Puce #304 * Woodinville, WA 98oJ2 * 5uperior_NWgcomcast.net
206-930-5724 ATTACHMENT 4
PLN20100019-
Plot plan showing rough locations of trees. The smaller circles indicate trees below the canopy
that can not be seen from the aerial, photo.
13 1 1 o NE 177`6 'lace 9304 • Woodinville, WA Y-9072 " 5uperior_NWecomcast.net
ATTACHMENT 4
..aG 9?a 57z� PLN20100019
•
a
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
April 20, 2010
Gina Coccia, Planner
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager
PLN20100019, Mujkanovic — Tree Removal
17806 Olympic View Drive
Engineering has reviewed and approved the subject application with the following condition
to be noted in the staff report.
All work shall take place on private property, including staging of equipment for tree removal.
Thank you.
City of Edmonds ATTACHMENT 5
PLN20100019
s •
0
c
c
ca
a)
a o
N 00
.O N
c
CO
o
p
N C x N
w
cu
QEN
C. ;
_
cN
c
O
a
ni 'o
0 Coa)
U o
o
O
o Ica
Y
U a
~
Z
Z
Q
C7 coi
C E
�C
o
o
o
o
o
L
a)
=
T
cn
m
'n
(D Y
a)
p
C v
cn
E
E
f
CY)CCi
U
U
N
a
o
m p
Z
>.
w¢
O
w:s
Of
p U a
'
aL
O_
= O >.� =
C
N
Ca
E a
�
i
i
ao
'O (O 5
a LL c
(6
cn
a)cn 0 MO
0 3
U
0
CC m
L) _
O
C
O N -CL ` CO
a) — E
I
LU
C L .0 0 •p
0 a) s W
. C
O
U ~ Z
Q
O
p
a) 0 3 c (O
Z
C
ir
T O N CC>
E
C f
U
N
!— a) U oo n Q
o>
g
o
-- oLo
CD
CL
N
CD>.
N
CO � O cg N r-
C`
(O
E
N
s
ti
O
cc
fa) O C :.. C
U > co -oa •` .o
.d
m
m
m
co
E a)
i
2
Q 2 ca c4 p
d
Q I
o
0
0
0
0
c
I
ca
. `
C
O
O
j
?
Ca
O
p
d
a
o_
U ;
U
cn
Q
a d
J
Q
a)
O
o_�
Q d
U
U
-
Z
a)
O
O
ZO
0
00o
a
a
o
o R cd C
A
a�owo
azr-I
cz
0 O O N
ON
O
O
>,O
0
0=
U O
`' o aUU�
o4,A'r'
aj rAci
a
CC ^t} N
>
O
C O
N
C M
O 'O OEA
U
O
>
C
0 a°
> ¢o
o
^O
p U C
00
U
y~ U O p
C O
0 t U y
o ¢•
4
�
3
H U
.c r
O
a)
•� .0 ..a G. O
U 'C
M
CZ
N
�+ U O
O 'O
U bA p y
ar_i cd
U
un
L.
U r
Q
En
O O p
0
O }
U O
0
O O
O y N
B O O
L7a
E
N
O U .O U cd
F, 'O
o 0
"C O
U U O t
O
O cC Q
cl ',; a�
O
o
.' Ca
O Q.+En N
>
tr y >
+^
o o =
a>
>Ln
O C .�
U
+,oarTsa�
CZ
tea,
iU". cUi Q ca
,
to czcz
C
c>,
0 3 o
.
U -a C O
a�
cd
�s
Qcz N
cq3 0
" Va 1 0.1
CITY OF EDMONDS 17,gr 1420,
-1 2] 5!' Avenue Edmonds WA 98020 1\16rth,
I I F. A NdN/1V
Phone: 425.771.0220 - ak. � 425,771.0221 - Web: %,vWNV.&e monQwaws-
D E llvCLOPMENT SERVICESDEPARTMENT i PLANNrNG DIVISION
Public Ndtice Payment Agreement
Per Edm onds Community DeVeloo.nri . en . t Code (ECDQ20"03,,tht Develo I orneini Sirvices Department will publish
notices of application,..threshold determinition, and city newspaper (Everett Herald).
pyblic hearin@ in the official c
Flease provide the name, billing address apd,phon6 6uffib@r pf the Oetson(s) responsible. for paying the cost (as
determined by the newspaper) of publishing legal notice, for th&p—jett identified, in the official tit n' "ei.. If.
9 . I I (0j ewspap
you have any questimi fbr the Herald regarding pricing, you may - 0 r V contact Jody Knoblich. at 425-339,3089 0' a vi`
email at leaa Is9herald6et.c6m.
Filekumber'.1 PLN20106619 (ttte Cutting rRe'rni_10'
810 To: Hasirn Muilkanbvic,
Addres.t..,, 17806 Olympic View -Drive, Ednionds WA §9026
Phone: 425.761.15340
Eaton- cl6v-6r5sesariieg)h'otihall.'com
By slghlh 9 'be6w 1: agree that i am the applkoni, 'or i am authorized by the 'applicia t, to orgire 'On ttefr behalf,-
. pay the amount billed by'time tt... _pitb'lkatloti. of thileol notice, as Will as tile_, 00#6gi;-fe e for.
any mailings for the project identified dbove.
Hasim Mujkabbvic 0 -401jtaot 'E3 Au t hoiiied
1�2
x
Signature' Date
Plea;e s1gh and return- thlifor*t6tI he'�PlanniigDivlsionotydLi�,Ldriiesteon'vO"rl'eh`ce.
The Planner asslgned toycU,projectw1knotily, you Of iheUTouni;6ef6rpubjkh1hd andlj 1"1'
no,
. Developervent Services DepinUnent I —P1aijrflngD1%-15i6n1l 2219"'Av'eii66t4oriliEditiondsWA98OZO1415..,AT .,WHMENT 6
An code cleutihns rap befound an the CItycifEdiri6nds webstle: YjWW.d.-edmVj70sjWa.rj.S. PLN20100019
Affidavit of blic"'atio'n
STATE. OF W'A'S'H' IN�GTON,
C16UNTYOjF-SNOHOMI'SH
YjAY 2 6 2 010
1401lj C 4 LLRK
Accowt Na rm: bly DI Ed monds
The undersigried, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Ocik of
THE HERALD, i daily newspaper primcdaiuJ published inibe City of Everett. County of
Snohonlish;tind Sbie of W"hiugtcm-. that said newspaper is a newspaper of general
circti ation in said Coututy and Stalm that said newspaper has been approved as a h "I
newspaper by order of the Shipmor'C' curt of I Snohomish County and that the notice
Notice of D c vc1orinnot Aplillcalian
Hasini.'t Iqjkqtlovic
!a'pri'nteO.60piofwhich islicieuiiioaitacliri-i,,wspub'ii's-bed in said newspaper lhiiperiind not. in,
suppicwnl form in, flit: regular and. untiti edi,tiqu of said palicy - on the faflowing days and
time*, namly;
11Iuy 112,'20110
,and (hat saUnewspaper was tigtdarly disiribut6d in its 9ubivcr "-. durihi all of said 01 W.
W, —nei-pal cierk
St,ib9c4cd d' sworn t.qr fbrc, me this 12th
day. of- May, 2010
.Notary -Public in and ford tale Ql'VVlw T. f with iweren '�-nohoiiiiish
�
C
Accourd tiumbm: -1001416 1p CNfrj!N1rmber. QW1695507
NNI,
11, 1AW
ATTACHMENT 6
PLN20100019
fnc. is 9\)
March 27, 2002
CITY OF EDMONDS GAR YHAAKENSON
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0 • AX (425) 771.0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT IL I
Planning • Building • Engineering E
ET
F1.
LE
William K. Holloway
17806 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds, WA 98026
RE: Connection to Sanitary Sewer Main
Dear Mr. Holloway:
CERTIFIED MAIL
The City of Edmonds has completed the Perrinville Sanitary Sewer project in your neighborhood. This
has brought to our attention that your house is not yet connected to the sewer system that is available to
you.
The Edmonds Community Development Code (Section 18.10.010) requires that the. owner(s) of any
house in the City of Edmonds that is within 200 feet of a sewer line must connect to the sewer system
within 60 days of it being available. Your residence is not within 200 feet of the Edmonds line and you
will not be required to connect.
Although we will not require you to connect to the City of Edmonds sewer system, I strongly encourage
you to contact the City of Lynnwood and request to connect to their sewer main on Olympic View Drive,
as there is a history of septic system failure in the Perrinville area,: Because of this, it may be financially
advantageous to you to connect before your system fails. This would allow you time to obtain multiple
quotes from contractors, instead of being forced into an emergency situation where you may have to hire
the first available contractor. If your septic system fails, you will be required to connect to the sewer
main at that time.
In addition, septic systems create environmental concerns. Septic systems seep into our groundwater, and
in your case, feed into the Perrinville Creek. This affects the habitat (aquatic and land) surrounding the
tributary, which then flows into Puget Sound.
Please don't hesitate to call Pamela Lemcke or me at the City of Edmonds Engineering Division,
425-771-0220, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
DA K. GEBERT, Px
City Engineer
DKG/PUcmc
c: Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Jason Tourtellot, Code Enforcement Inspector
DAMy Documenu\Engsec\PROJECTS\EBGA.Perrinville LIMSewerConnect.Hollowey.doc
Incorporated August 11, 1890
c..4.^. r;+., ca,.l,:..,.. Imo.—