19303 OLYMPIC VIEW DR (2).pdfhh 'A
k
CITY OF EDMONDS FILE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE - -�
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FEE
REC'T #
HEARING DATE: -1 me
APPLICANT {)AiU U),4LUACE ADDRESSf%303 uJCITY & ZIP Fd/;77Q/7 S JPoa(�
PHONE 7111197(, C Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: 0Cc)AI PcL V1 G
OWNER. 1�;- ADDRESS,CITY & ZIP PHONE 't
I t`
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) /�,3p,� (�� (4 Yn.joj c. 1� j C'" co -Dt2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERY.
U
95
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & APPROVED 1
USE ZONE IQ S -- / �� BY PLANNING DIVISION j
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:
Gsm"M
VARIANCE REQUESTED: %
STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
ATTACHED:
i
STATE OF WASHINGTON)ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ee�G�
SignatalCof Applicant, Owner or Representative
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publi f a f r the State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared AS
o-_,who, being
duly sworn, on b4mt/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has p epared and read the foregoing
statementsand has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has
signed this instrument as 44e/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein
mentioned. `Wt&
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 192!
residing at
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
If
ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT
POINT 1. The following are the special circumstances which apply to my property
i which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the identical zone classification.
Q h er4
I
POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be aetrimenzal Lu LIM NuLJ,l� .."
fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in
whirh my nrooerty is located because:
POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will
to the owner of this property, the cause of _wLhich is beyond his control
L�1 �'f. i ►.. c fit U AkoL C'e'
continue
because.
POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this
tions to be imposed so as not to cause in-
variance I submit the following condi
consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which I am located. ^ ,�
e iivt, S1'r U.0 T &h
i
t.
or
l
Findings of Fact b _
ment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of
The Board of Adjust File No. % 0 '7 request for variance at
the following:
Board of Ad ustmen
to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same
1. that notice was given according
are in the file.
2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have4bae-� been met.
3. In addition thereto,
4. Therefore, the request for variance is jg9jEWGranteds subject to the following special
conditions:
6-.
•
Section 12.16,110 and if a building.permit and/or occupancy io2. is not obtained
for. Lhe subject property within one year ically of the Board's
decision, the con-
ditiona.l use permit or variance shall be automat
Decision shall be effective on:
DATA
Date of Application: 7g
Date of Publication:
Date of Posting: --
Date of Appeal from Decision of ti►e Board:
c
ate
77
Date of Hearing: 'l 7�
Continuances:
i
1� r
i
Li
5rKLtcGvuRe
,Q fi
ta303 {
Y
CV
..� P
r
u
A
� i t
comb
i
a
i p I i CITY OF EDNIONDS I
W i k P. We DEPT. ENGINEERING 'DIV, .
r i%AId IN E
----- cc DATE
CITY Or
rr +• : r
BD
REMARKS.
LL► 'i. REMARKS
_ I !
CONDITIONAL PERMIT }}
i
WORK•
737
30,3
1 - i ADDRESS•
�Y
ow _ Z0N[
AP OVED DATE• '
i 3 ' FT%ACKS:
�. 1
LDG. OFFICIALBY
�- R O NT
KEEP THESE `STAMPED
' N TE FOR t :•.r.�� _ �� � .-_-�
PLANS O � �S�I '� .... �•� R _� S •
SHEET p _ �-H L R ;.
= PERMIT NO.. � � � �- 1
E I of HEiGHT �a p,7Sc6red
..�� `tom-- ✓ -..... _ . _. . _ .. __ ..._.. _. _...... _................-....._...__. _ ,..,._
tt
or
It
op vo,
:.
L too
o
3 c'> 1 1 r A (� 4 t t ? 1j ��, t r` ... t'''. r .
_. _ -f ',to
�:..
of
1p
t
1
a
i
(�o�EI�TY aWneNS,
ow�lh 9
gd f��r OF Scca SE7CT —
1,F505 ay Pic 0plc.) ale tV E
d,hohds
KEUcy
tgaa3 oj�Yj► pjc o l EW Die .
�d vnon�.s
. W ' dh �•� ►FRS : DA�L�S 3RccMBf�c�.
l q 3o t OLY�(,�� G 11l �Gc) lJ1e� V E-
rnoYlds
�►.N� M R * M\�s. l��c�kA1�0 SiM�laflls
5 s I M 'P�S Ci lek' A u A) S o
LL)
:(4 h d S
i
I
i
�1
NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION
FOR VARIANCE - =Rk11QNAkXM3ZXRHWUT
BY EDMONDS, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
YCito
14444
+
All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the
19th day of July 1978 I
. has been set as the
date for hearing petition filed by Wayne S. Wallace
for a variance from required rear yard
setback
t.
• lit'
at 19303 Olympic View Drive
said property being zoned RS-12
;4
rj
+
r
Said 'hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
,
Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment
and all interested persons are invited to appear.
IRENE VARNEY MORAN
City Clerk, City of Edmonds
FILE NO, V-48-78
PUBLISH: 7-3-78
!
a
I
t
M
STATE OF WASHINGTON.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH#
B-2-1
ss.
Affidavit of Publication
The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says
that she is Principal Clerk of the EVERETT HERALD, a daily news-
paper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snoho-
mish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper
of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper
has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
and that the notice ••••••e... &.••••.•
Court of Snohomish County,
...................
NOTICE ..........
OF IiE":�'II;G ...... ..........
.......................................................
......................................................... .....
hich is hereunto attached, was published In said
a printed copy of w
newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and
entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: 5
JU.............7... 97`�..........................................
........................... ....
.. ...
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period.
i
Principal Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to beforeme this ..:.:..nth:........
[iY.:.:.:...., 19..7,8.0
.day of :.... .. ....................................... r ;
i
vf?.......:.
•- ...........
Notary Fublic in and for the State of Washington,
...........................
residing at Everett, Snohomish Countya
t
j
t ,
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
F �
FILE N0.
APPLICANT
ne S. Wall
i
y'
Nancy Ed4mon Luster, being first duly sworn,
Y'
on oath deposes and says:
F Y
That on the `% day of 19, .t e
Nh
attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Or finance,
and in any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where -applic-
able., on or near the subject property.
Signed 1
Subscribed and sworn to 'before me this day of,
19 `7
Notary Nublic
in
and
t
Washington
residing
at
A
i
'NOTICE OF `PU0B206L1C H EARI N G6.t:-
0 to
' i 5'
I .. 1 a a t
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A ""
�I - ' PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE -� - `J4`•�1:
A {) �y
ION
It
It
OF
�A d T ,
It
AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FOR.. ....IC....4lt4 000
s ... . 0., .,.'
,,r• acre r� ��,
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Ot•y •.r. j 1'� 1
L,IJ
FI\tr L I
47L;G t
4 It
1 30
4
PROPERTY, DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS 1.:....,.......... '
It•a,
rw
It1rj..
s y
4..
=ZONE ':CLASSIFICATION :. :: r.. ...:.. .
r,Ip
e
TIME`& DATE OF;'HEARING.60.^ oIIp.`..1IwI.I'I0 .. e.:
11 imI,I DAY DATE ;.'
.:' Y Of
rf� „ (t It
3 <
MEETING WILL BE HELD IP� THE COUNCEL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC`t „I
:,CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET, ANY PERSON INTERESTEDIN THIS
yr {{,PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. COMMENTS.,
CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE`
' MEETING, IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE;
'OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXT• 227). IN THE, 'r
O:' EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC
��'4ti`HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT' REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME:r
tr4TIME *AND PLACE. 7:
tj
1 rFILE NO. • !! •S q few 17 °! • . PUBLISHED... .�.wa7g .. y•
1. ti
The removal, mutilation, destruction., or
It k
concealment of this notice prior to the date
r • of the hearing is a misdemeanor punishable
by fine and imprisonment,
y
---- PLANNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW FORM FILE # Vf - 7 k
I
APPLICANT: U bcjc
ADDRESS: %9 C_1 G/ 2,C- ZONING: Rc s— 1
VARIANCE REQ ESTED: ,XA0 /1,QCLyu.�
ZONING CODE EQUIREMENT:
t
OTHER PERTINNT FACTS:
6 VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12,16.100
1. Does this amount to a rezone?rW,1
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or c'rcumstances not generally applicabl too her
lands in the same district?
o T
we
(b) Would strict enforcement of the zoning code eprive the property own e of rights
comnonl�y enjoyed by oth r roperti es in the same district? GC, C>� ICq
(9
1
i
3. Do the special conditions result from the actions of the applicant?
�
4. Are there unnecessary hardships and pra tical difficuitie in carryin out the.
provisions of the zoning code? JE
5, Will the granting of the variance be detrim tal to the health, safety, or welfare
of property owners in the vicinity? , , Lt/ZQ;Q
,1
a
6. Is this t e minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land?
-.lJ cu C.v
7. Will the gran,ipg of the variance generally be in harmony and compatibly with this
zoning code? l (�.L/LS CI X.,p v L,
Planner's Variance Review 12/77
APPLICANT:
HEAR'* I NG : _
�) LU
a 3)/
3)
PILE'
,r.
,i
}f€f
�
FACT SHEET- FILE
I
I
,
i
... F.,.. 7
L
1 ` • 1 1 ••1 . 1 �,.
1T'
•
{
•
ITY OF EDMONDS
{ i { P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIVA,
i c.4AMINE
BY q%J.
.•fir=-----r — -- DATECRY
•
REMARKS -
CONDITIONAL PERMIT
WORK.
ADDRESS• 90
ZQN
,
t �
_� __•_
AP OVED DATE•j I
BY ! , SLTBACKS: _ c
aS
• LDG. OFFICIAL� E- ���i��T ,
` KEEP THESE STAMPED
PLANS ON I ,I TE FOR'�---
i SHEEN
l i t PERMIT NO.. U� HLRt
OF
HUGHT ��' 1
•
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WAS14INGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTING: Board Of Ad j ustment Meeting Minutes
RE: V-48-78
r
REMARKS
HARVE H• NARRISON
MAYOR
1,
i
1
PLANNING DIVISION
Byrd inquired why the parking was needed now if the exptinsion was
only in the proposal stage. Mr. Morgan responded that they have
already made some changes to the existing drainage pattern as well as
traffic patterns on 2nd and James and it is anticipated they will be
under construction within a short period, for the building as well as
the improvements to James St. He said the requested temporary parking
eventually will be made permanent with the necessary improvements.
City Attorney Wayne Tanaka advised that this kind of Conditional Use
Permit could only be granted if the Board found unusual circumstances
which necessitate use of the parking lot. Mr. Roy responded that
those circumstances were that they would be building on this site and
they needed a place to park their vehicles off the street during con-
struction. MR. ROY THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. VISSER, TO APPROVE
CU-31-78 BECAUSE HE DID NOT BELIEVE A TEMPORARY PARKING LOT WOULD BE
DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, WELFARE, AND SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD
s
AND BECAUSE HE FELT THIS WAS A DESIRABLE SOLUTION. MOTION CARRIED.
AGENDA
V-47-78 ROBERT C. SURYAN - Variance from required side yard setback at 8419
Olympic View Dr. (RS-12)
The request was for a 5' variance from the required 10' side yard
setback. The applicant wished to construct a cover with no sides for
his trailer and boat to protect them from tree sap and debris caused
by trees on the adjoining
property. be
of fiber glass and the structure will hohstructure 1
notimpairanyviews, Mrs. Luster
showed a slide of the proposed structure which already was under con-
struction. She recommended approval because it would be a minimum
variance to allow.the applicant to construct a cover for his trailer
and boat of sufficient size to be practical; because it will make the
most reasonable use of the land, and because the cover is needed for
protection of the boat and trailer -and will not create a traffic hazard
or obstruct views of the neighboring property. She noted that the
paving for the pad has been there since the home was built a little over
one year ago. She said her office had been informed by a neighbor that
the structure was going up without a permit. She noted that a concrete
slab would be permitted to intrude into the setback without a variance
but a structure would not. The public portion of the hearing was opened,
no one wished to speak, and the public portion was closed.
Mr. Hatzenbuhler asked the applicant if he was aware of the setback
requirements when he started the structure without a permit. Mr. Suryan
responded that he had thought the setback requirement was 51. Mr. Suryan
then provided the Board with photographs of the structure from different
angles. Mr. Byrd thought it did not appear that the structure would have
the extended life that the house would have. Mr. Visser felt it would be
in compliance with the requirements. MR. VISSER THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY
MR. HATZENBUHLER, TO APPROVE V-47-78 BECAUSE IT WOULD BE AN IMPROVEMENT
TO THE PROPERTY, WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, WELFARE, AND
SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VARIANCE REQUIRE-
MENTS. MOTION CARRIED.
V-4848 WAYNE S. WALLACE - Variance from required rear yard setback at 19303
1l p c View Dr. (RS-12)
The variance was requested so the applicant could build a deck on the
north side of his property. His application had been for an 8' wide
deck but he amended it to 6' wide at the hearing, thereby needing only
a 3' variance. The proposal would result in a 22' rear yard setback,
rather than the required 25'. Mrs. Luster said this would not be a rezone.
EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 2 - July 19, 1978
P
V-49-78
She said a 6' deck would allow them to take advantage of their view
of the water and would not block anyone else's view. They could
build a 3' catwalk deck without a variance, but that would not serve
their purpose. There are a number of large evergreens and shrubs
which will buffer the deck from the view of others. Their neighbors
to the east are higher than they are so they would look over the deck.
Mrs. Luster recommended approval because this appeared to be a minimum
variance for a 6' wide deck and there appeared to be other property
owners in the area with similar decks going into the setbacks, because
it would not cause a traffic hazard, -and because it will not obstruct the
views of neighbors. The public portion of the hearing was opened.
Mrs. Wayne Wallace said this problem had come about because they had
thought their rear yard was their side yard when the home was built.
No one else wished.to.speak, and the public portion of the hearing was
closed. ,MR. HATZENBUHLER.MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. VISSER';JO`APPROVE
V-48-78 BECAUSE ,IT IS A 'HINIM�U11:,VARIA.NCE AND' WILL NOT''NOT DO' ANYTHING'
TO ENDANGER..TFIE .HEALTH, WELFARE;`. AND SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORS, AND IT'
WILL IMPROVE. -IMPROVE. USE OF THE PROPERTY.- MOTION'CARRIED.'"
TERRY P. WHALEN - Variance from required street standards at 7107 and
7025 Lake Ballinger Way (RSW-12)
Mrs. Luster said this application was to allow two turnarounds, one.for
each lot, instead of one turnaround. Itis part of a recent subdivision.
The original proposal was to have one turnaround and then grant an ease-
ment to each of the other lots to use the turnaround. This.proposal
would provide a separate turnaround for each lot, thereby not having to
provide easements to each lot. The City originally proposed having one
turnaround and having it go across both pieces of property, which would
necessitate grading an easement to use it. This will provide safer
access to SR104 as neither will be required to back onto the street, and
it will eliminate the need for an easement for each lot. The Engineer-
ing Department recommended approval as long as each turnaround, meets City
requirements. Mrs. Luster recommended approval because it will provide
a safe turnaround so cars will not directly egress and ingress from SR104,
because it will eliminate the need to grant easements to each lot for a
turnaround, and because the proposed turnarounds will meet City standards.
The public portion of the hearing was opened, the applicant said he had
nothing to add, and the public portion was closed.
Chairman Bailey felt this appeared to be a logical answer to the problem
on SR104. MR. ROY MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. BYRD, TO APPROVE V-49-78 BECAUSE.
IT WOULD NOT MAKE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS ANY MORE DANDEROUS AND IN THE LONG
RUN IT MIGHT REMOVE SOME CONCERNS, AND IT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE
HEALTH, WELFARE, AND SAFETY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. MOTION CARRIED.
V-50m78 JOHN BOSHART - Variance to allow accessory structure on property without
primary structure and variance from 1,000 sq. ft. maximum accessory
building area on Spruce St., between 7th and 8th Ave. (RS-6)
This property is across the alley from the applicant's home. The applicant
has a Conditional Use Permit for a plant nursery and was seeking a variance
from the Code definition of accessory structures and to exceed 1,000 sq.
ft. The maximum height will be 15' and a 5' setback is required. The
applicant wished to expand the greenhouse in order to extend the growing
season of his plants. The existing structure is 16' x 44' and the
proposed new structure would be 33' x 44', which will exceed that allowed
by 450 sq. ft. There are also other buildings on the site: a 6' x 10'
shed for geese and ducks, an 8' x 16' greenhouse attached to the existing
16' x 44' greenhouse, and a 10' x 9' structure. All of the structures
total 982 sq, ft., and if the applicant increases his greenhouse to 33' x
44' the total will be 1,730 sq. ft. He has indicated he will change the
8' x 16' greenhouse to a structure with just a roof and trellis which will
EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 3 - July 19, 1978
,i
fi
I