Loading...
8432 OLYMPIC VIEW DR (2).pdfMA 1}' f T { 02102/1998 09:29 77990e6 F !! I KM.EL TRUCTION9 INC a=a - ata'ri4 OM G.W. a SO MOND6► WA t OR$ February 2, 1998 u,! Barbara Fahey Mayor oCity of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North r Edmonds, Washington 98020 e a: RE: V-97-145 MICHEL CONST X z Year Mayor: z t—, u, u,1 The purpose of this letter is to request a withdrawal of the planning 0 o Director's intention of filing a reconsideration request to the Hearing 0 m p Examiner. h LU X "' First, I want to apologize for bringing this land use issue to your attention LL o, but it appears Mr. Mar is unavailable. z, v w Friday, January 30, 1998, 1 happened to be at the Community Services o counter for other business when I was told the Planning Director was filing z a request for reconsideration on my approved variance of January 21st. 1998. I was also told the Director had received counsel from the City Attorney because he feared a new precedent would be set with my approved variance. His fear would cost me additional money. My fear is the City will set a precedent of disagreeing with the Hearing Examiner and be perceived as trying to set policy through requests for reconsideration and appeals. The following are a few reasons why I think the request for reconsideration should be withdrawn: 1. According to ECDC 20.100.020 0. ... a written request can only be filed by a Person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony.... Since the Planning Director was not present, it does not seem fair that he should be able to have another staff person file u reconsideration request with the Hearing Examiner. 2. An activity easement was first requested by staff. For the Hearing Examiner to allow a 5 foot activity casement does not seem to be unreasonable. flee the attached drawing showing this activity easement area which totals approximately 38 square feet! NMCNMZ oe t_ M " �tii; yy t" l7 da[3y�4 r�a�SS C�y�r� jg; 7 , r � v t '� 02/0211998 09.28 7789086 MICHEt_`COItSi' PAGE 03 3. Staff had their. chance to present their case at the ` public hearing , and had angle time to prepare their arguments while the applicant barely had two days to prepare a response to the staff report. 4. Staff does not have a track record of filing requests for reconsideration and especially in regard to such an insignificant amount of property. Less cc 21 � than 1% of the lot area! s o � 01 u1 S. The applicant should have been officially notified that the City of J �E Edmonds was going to go out of their way to hinder (NO. 4 above) the (1) L applicant, a citizen of the City of Edmonds, in their use of their property w a for arbitrary reasons. Any delay is costly. 2 g � 6. It appears that this type of variance request was the first in the city to be recommended by staff to the nearing Examiner as a "Modified wU1. Approval" which in essence was a request for "Denial" of my request. I z a1, think the staff has ulterior motives in the request for reconsideration. If of they were worried about a precedent being set then they should have ,,, u,t Ipresented testimony in that regard. They had their opportunity at the 2 Qpublic hearing. c� m a t- The Planning Director enjoyed direct access to the city attorney while I was not allowed to talk to anyone. I know the staff would not single out one citizen to over step their authority but at times it feels that way. LLa tii ran In light of all the other things that are going on in the City of Edmonds, this land use issue is very small (48 8q rc) but if it is used to set policy or there is an abuse of authority, it may demand more attention. it I am available For a meeting with staff. A response would be greatly appreciated. Thank your time and kind consideration. Sincerely, Robin W. Michel ®' cc: Jeff Wilson ,01/3a/1998 17:57 7789096 I dONSTRUCTION, INC. a= - aI&TM Wr. l.W. - =M*NGtly iRfi 9*=6 January 34, 1998 a 1 Jeff Wilson RE. V-97.145 ti` Planning Department Director X City of Edmonds L4 C3 121 5th Avenue North w ®l Edmonds, Washington 98(i20 w, Dear Jeff: cn O� LU The purpose of this letter is to request a reconsideration of your reconsideration request to the Hearing Examiner. U. I y d 1. An activity easement was first requested by staff. For the rearing x;, Examiner to allow a 5 foot activity easement does not seem to be Z 1-1 unreasonable. See the attached drawing showing this activity easement oG area which totals approximately 3$ square feet! w w. MI 2. Staff had their chance to present their case at the public hearing and had ample time to prepare their arguments while the applicant barely had o LU two days to prepare a response to the staff report- U. © 3. According to BCDC 20.100.020 G. States a written request can only be Z filed by a person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance Lii register and/or presents testimony.... Since you were not present, it does o not seem fair that you should have staff file a reconsideration request with Z the Hearing Examiner. 4. Staff does not have a track record of filing requests for reconsideration and especially in regard to such an insignificant amount of property. Less than 1% of the lot areal. City S The applicant should have been officially notified that the of Edmonds was going to go out of their way to hinder ('NQ. 4 above) the applicant, a citizen of the City of Edmonds, in their use of their property for arbitrary reasons. Any delay is costly. I know the staff would not single out a citizen to unleash their wrath but at times it feels that way. Please respond by 8 AM Monday Feb. 2nd. 1998 or 1 will have to go to the Mayor. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely. Robin W. Michel Fu)r-4;Aw*'7. t— ui w c� 0 0 w x F- L. di c� F 0 z 7 AR CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 STH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425)771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant -�c,1 Sy" Dear Mr. Irwin, The Planning Department is in receipt of your letter dated January 23, 1998 requesting clarification of responsibility in case of slide damages resulting from construction on the slope above your property. We have forwarded your letter to the City Attorney for comment. Although your correspondence did not specifically mention an appeal, we want to extend that option to you. Attached is a copy of Chapter 20.105 regarding appeals. Please note that the filing of an appear requires that you state the reasons why a decision is wrong: An appeal on this matter must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision, The City Attorney is currently reviewing your letter to address your concerns. Feel free to contact us if you have additional questions. Sincerely, ?effilson, AICP, Planning Supervisor Edmonds Community Services CC* File Nn V_97_145 WenAwbecOftom •RivnrkontQmttr+ 1CiaSkcct • Suite204 - WcnttcbmWA9&RO9 - (SM662d954 • F-PO 663.1553 o �, � 1 -� ttz.M `';l! S5��k4{��c'C' a''�yk1 i .Y,y E t � � t t j��;u) ♦Sv�ir F�C,t 1 ?,t �f4 `",sYs�"4 r1M1 ��+� �t1�;h�(� _ 7 t-0 � 't�+,t i"7 i,,4 $in �' a a tr. �' tSmSr�. ;. .F ,,;., 7 sh`.eiRp ti3 �.T4 .�'✓ F lta�!; w_ .li. „q ': r^" �'�i r .$1J88�88 HON 18.00 FAX Q003 R1YSO�iIm ti Kawamoto, Plamtttlg Jaittrry 26, 1998 a e Z HA- ac At WW MMvg dwl�0 I would HIM m vxith ?Cou st►d �s+� �g Roby Jeff auxl "v'' haul who -ate inbetested. We are to be doing MM ns to the ity'u Iyu t v 01 based CA the iafotmatlou which we bve gathered over the past couglc of ycm- It might be a Cn .1 good time to aadres�Am issues as welt. J h' 0WSS/gjZ w Aat U. Rob Chave 0, Paul `Mar. Jeff Wilson z ay. G In,.. a Laf ar_ T� Z Uj W 1= a z . AiIYB/98 HON .18:01 FAX i�004 s4a Exhibit A Bob hvia 19119 SSth Place W. Edmonds, WA 98026 RE, Your Ca>ansnimicutiou of January 21,19J8 M No. Dew W. Irwin: This letter aramowledges rm4pt of your letter received by the Planning Department on ,Yanuary 23, 1998. Attached is a copy of Chapter 20.105 regarding appeals. Please note that tine filing of an appeal requires that you state the reasons why a decision is wrong and that you are appealing. Your ItUct does not mention an appOat, nor does it provide ttte se Irons why yqu believe the decision to be wrong. Please mote that an appeal of ties matter must be Filed within fou#Aen (14) calendars days after the date of the decision being appealed. Your letter pdnu ily addresses liability and a copy has been forwarded to the City Attorney for comment. Very ttttly yours, CrrY OF M)MONDS T'3atttting Department J28/98_ MOAT 1Q:Q1 FAI. Exalt $ Bob hvin 18119 85th Place W. Edmonds, WA 9M26 RE: your Cortmuunlcadon of January 21, 19" File No. WI45 u g I Dear Mr. Irwin: cn � Your = of Tanuarry 21, 1998 has been forwarded to me for comment. The City has 1t z 1"il established a variety of regulatory meant m to .limit the impacts of development in z °' eavironmentatiy sensitive arm. Is this Case, a steep slope environment was defined by the City W w; and the applicant made a request for variance, based upon the report of a gootechnical expert, In � +n; Robot Winters, PIS, Chadwick 8z Winters. The Eeotechnical report was characterized d by u hearing amminer as indicating "... a very stable slope ... " Xu, While you filed a written objection before and after the decision, the City is obligated to make ,� a its decision based upon the record of a proceeding. Only "substantial and ewnpetent evidence z can be considered. While the staff and I appreciate your concern reprdiog steep slope �'� ernviroaaments, the City is obligated to make its decision upon the information brought fgsward o H at a hearing and to do it on the braid of the best evidence available. In this case, father than 2 your objection, no other public testimony was given. The record therefore reflects only the conclusions of the applicant's geotechnical expert regarding the stability of the slope. In my opinion as the City's legal advisor, there is no liability which attaches to the City in this situation from, the approval of the requested variance basest un the vvidencc Wore it. Constmedon activities can trigger prWuW SiVil rights and remedies. If you are concerned about how the construction will be undertaktn, you may obtain the reports of the applicant's geotechtucal advisor from the Planning Department. In addition, given the steepness of the slope, a building permit may be processed under Chapter 19.05, the City's revisions to the state building code. you may wish to obtain a copy of that chapter, familiarize yourself with its 0 requirements and obtain copies of any plans or construction reports from the City's building department in order to monitor the progress of construction. Because of the terrain and physical characteristics of the soil in the City of Edmonds, the staff and I share your concerns regarding construction activities. In order to property regulate such 7M 0006 3 . }xr, t ifi iyfM BOB ORWIN �r 18119 85TH Pl. W : ircrinvics) Edmonds, WA. 98026 Ja Z 1�$ (425)776-3260 rn3Qjuno.com K A e Today is the 21 st day of January,1998 � Vtjj $j Mr. Jeff Wilson, Spvr. Ii Planning Division 121 5th Ave North 0 Edmonds, WA. 98020 a Re: file # V-97-145 Mr. Dennis O'leary z F-` Dear Mr. Wilson: oLU f LU= I disagree with the action taken to approve this variance. In view of the City of Edmonds' approval of the variance, on property which is adjacent to my property, I would like to ®r state that I believe that this project will undermine the stability of the hill below the project ( and above my house) and cause a slide in the future such as has been experienced.by other property owners in the northwest who built on land that, anti tha approving entity ti ivuHi A was stable. Any trees which may be cut near the crest and the down slope would further add to the risk as their roots help hold the hill. F zz In that a slide, because of this project, may very well impact my house I would like to know, from the City of Edmonds, with whom the responsibility for damages, resulting from such a slide, will rest, should it occur. jj Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. --..! Sin , cc. Councilman Gary Haakenson -::..r r-, z w a w h u- ui 0 z CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771.0220 - FAX 1206) 771-0221 HEARING EXAMINER BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR S t, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICANT: Rob Michel CASE NO.: V 97-145 LOCATION: Lot 2 of Short Plat S-28-79; 84xx Olympic View Drive (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1). APPLICATION: A reasonable use variance to reduce both the required 50 foot critical area buffer to zero and 15 foot building setback from the critical area buffer to zero, to allow the construction of a 2,100 square foot house and 900 square foot garage (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2 and 3). REVIEW PROCESS: Variance: Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. MAJOR ISSUES: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Development Standards). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development 'Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES). c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.15B.040.C. (REASONABLE USE) O SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION: Staff Recommendation: Approve modification with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions PUBLIC HEARING: 0 After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the application was opened at 10:44 a.m., January 15, 1998, in the City Hall, Edmonds, Washington, and closed for oral testimony at 11:46 a.m. The hearing was held open until 5:00 p.m., January 15, 1998 to allow staff to submit information requested by the examiner. • Incorporated August 11, I890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan "41 earing Examiner Decision Case No. V 97-145 Page 3 blackberry and trees. The northern portion has a moderate rise with �. fewer trees and the ground is covered by grass. z Lul 2. Neighboring Development And Zoning: Q = a. Fact: The properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned o` Single -Family Residential (RS-12) and either vacant or are developed La wf with single-family homes (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1). LU B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) LU 1 �# 1. Fact: Variances granted based on special circumstances are exempt from U. SEPA review (WAC 197-11-800(6)(b) and ECDC 20.15A.080). UJ C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE ? 1— r oj' 1. Critical Areas Compliance z w ui r„ a. Facts: g � 1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.15.B o (Critical Areas Ordinance). = cwi 2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist (CA-97-236) LL o and it was determined that a study was required. Z ,;; b. Conclusion: The survey and top of slope determination dated October 1997 was done by Robert Winters P.L.S. of Chadwick and Winters. A r geotechnical report dated November 4, 1997 was performed by Dennis z Bruce, P.E. It supports the request to construct within the critical area building setback and buffer. 2. Compliance with RS-12 Zoning Standards { a. Fact: The short plat (S-28-79) declared this property a flag lot. ,1 Current policy in regards to flag lot setbacks is to consider all setbacks as "side" setbacks. b. Conclusion: The structure as proposed will comply with the O requirements of the RS-12 zoning standards. D. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR A VARIANCE 1. Fact: ECDC Section 20.15B.180. establishes the criteria (special circumstance and the minimum variance necessary) with which a Critical Area Variance may be granted by the Hearing Examiner. The applicant has submitted declarations with their submittal which address the variance decisional criteria as follows (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3): a) Special Circumstances (applicant statement): Because of the special t' circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location of surrounding steep slopes, strict application of this title,�a would deprive the subject property all reasonable use of the property. See attached plot plan showing a building area of only 486 square feet. b) U. to Minimum variance, not materially detrimental (applicant statement): The granting of this variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the development proposal which is a building area enjoyed by other lot owners in the area. This proposal will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated because development will follow the engineer's guidelines and described in the attached Geological report. The proposed development is not contrary to the goals and purposes of the chapter. 9 �i E. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR REASONABLE USE ,,. EXCEPTION cn d, LO 1. Fact: ECDC Section 20.15B.040(C) establishes the decisional criteria for a �- Reasonable Use Exception approval by the Hearing Examiner. Criteria number 7 states that a reasonable use exception may only be applied for if a variance pursuant to ECDC Section 20.15B.170(A). 0 0 aHj a) Denial of Reasonable Use (applicant statement): This chapter would deny all w w reasonable use of the subject property because Chapter 20.15B.110 of the U.— r Edmonds Community Development Code requires a fifty (50) foot wide buffer o from geological hazardous areas and section 20.15B.080.(C) requires a fifteen L (15) foot building set back from any required buffer. Please see attached drawing s which leaves only 486 square feet of building area. 0 ;® b) No other reasonable use consistent with zoning (applicant statement): There is no other reasonable use consistent with the underlying zoning with less impact on the critical area or its buffer, either primary or permitted secondary uses. c) No unreasonable threat to public (applicant statement): The proposed development will not pose any threat to the public health, safely or welfare on or off the property because the proposed single family residence will be built in accordance with the Geotechnical Engineer's guidelines. All development will be performed within the property lines with strict controls to prevent any debris or material encroaching onto adjacent properties. d) Minimum reduction of critical area to allow for reasonable use (applicant statement): The proposed alteration to the critical area and its buffer will be minimized as much as possible to allow a reasonable building area as enjoyed by ® existing lot owners in the area. No building is planned in the 40% slope area and the proposed building will be set back approximately 25 feet from the west property line. e) Compliance with all other State and Federal laws (applicant statement) The proposed activity complies with all state local and federal laws. No sediment or pollution challenges. No floodplains involved. Wastewater to be removed from site through city sewer system. "Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. V 97-145 Page 5 f) Requested Reasonable Use Exception is not due to any current or previous owners action (applicant statement): Since the lot was platted and recorded in 1981, the economic use deficiency was created after the effective date of the adoption of this new ordinance. F. CONCLUSIONS FOR THE VARIANCE CRITERIA: -"" rn u. 1. The site has both an upward and downward slope. The critical slope virtually uU C splits the subject property in half. After the critical area buffer, the additional building setback from the buffer, and the standard setback from the other property U. d lines, a small, odd shaped building envelope remains. 2. The building footprint proposed by the applicant is 2,100 square for the house and z a 900 square foot attached garage. As proposed, the garage would be up to the top z o{ of slope identified by the geotechnical study and a side property line setback to the east and the majority of the home appears to be at least 15 feet away from the top a of slope. The geotechnical report does indicate a very stable slope and oconstruction can occur anywhere on the property with proper techniques and w w materials. = cr N "-` z, G. CONCLUSIONS FOR THE REASONABLE USE CRITERIA: UJ o i. The size and location of the critical area is such that the use of the property is z limited to a very small, odd shaped home. An exception is necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property. 2. The RS-12 zoning designation limits development of the property to residential homes and accessory uses, similar to what is proposed. 3. The geotechnical evaluation performed by Dennis Bruce P.E. dated November n-- - 4, 1997 approved construction on the site subject to several conditions and recommendations. 0 4. The applicant has requested elimination of both the 50 foot critical area buffer and 15 foot building setback from a critical area buffer. If approved as conditioned below, the proposal would have a minimal temporary impact on the critical area and will allow for a reasonable use of the property. 5. The proposal will comply with all Federal, State and local laws and ordinances with the exception of these variance requests. 6. The short plat which created this lot was processed in the late 70's, early 80's, prior to adoption of the Critical Areas chapter of the ECDC. None of the lots from the short plat have had development requests to date. It does not appear as if the reasonable use exception or variance request is the result of the actions of the current or previous owners. 0 a LU LL L) I-- 0 2 E OMearing; Exan-dner Decision Case No. V 97-145 Page 6 H. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 1. Review by City Departments a. Fact: The variance application has been reviewed and evaluated by the Fire Department, Public Works Division, Engineering Division, and the Parks and Recreation Division. No comments were received. I. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC) I., Comprehensive Plan Designation a) Fact: The subject property is designated as "Single Family" residential on the comprehensive plan. b) Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. 2. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies a. Fact: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential Development section, identifies goals and policies which relate to "Residential Developmene' in the City. Specific goals and policies are discussed in detail below. 1) Section B, states as a Goal of the City that: "High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted...:' b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the above adopted goals and policies of the City for residential property in the City. c. Facts: The Soils and Topography section of the Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goal and policies: 1) Section C states as a Goal of the City that: "Development on steep slopes or hazardous soil conditions should preserve the natural features of the site, in accordance with the following policies:" a. C. La. Grading, filling, and tree cutting shall be restricted to building pads, driveways, access ways and other imperious surfaces. b. C. Lb. Grading shall not jeopardize the stability of any slope, or of an adjacent property.. 1. On January 7, 1998, the City received a letter (Exhibit A, Attachment 8) from Mr. Robert Irwin who lives at 18119 85th PI W. Edmonds. His letter stated the following concern with the proposal: a. He is against any change to allow any crowding, encroachment or other placement that would allow a building to be placed where one would not be allowed now. K. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS z N! The letter does not identify how this proposal does not meet the Reasonable Use Exception or o variance criteria or provide reasons for staff to use in making a recommendation for denial. z �. w su, :) DECISION 2 oBased upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance as shown on UJ Wf Exhibit A, Attachment 5 is approved, subject to the following conditions: 3: LL 1. Flag top of slope identified by the October 1997 topographic survey performed by ,.. u; Chadwick & Winters prior to any construction activity. vT o F- 2. For construction purposes, a 5 foot activity easement within the critical area adjacent to z the southeast corner of the proposed garage will be allowed. A construction sequence plan is to be provided with the building permit application to demonstrate intrusions into the activity easement and proposals for restoration. 3. Install a temporary chain link fence south of the garage and a temporary fabric fence south and west of the house to protect the critical area slope from intrusions. The location of the fences shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to installation. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, a Critical Area Tract and Notice on Title ® (supplied by the City) of the critical area and buffer per ECDC 20.15B.160.A.&B. must be recorded with Snohomish County. 5. All design and construction activity shall adhere to the suggestions and recommendations made in the geotechnical report by Robert Bruce P.E. (Attachment 7 to Exhibit A). 6. Any future expansion, additions, accessory structures etc. must comply with standard zoning setbacks or apply for variances. 7. The applicant shall comply with the original short plat conditions of approval (see Exhibit A, Attachment 7). 8. The applicant must obtain all necessary permits prior to any construction. - t � ,r l i i ' { J Wu ♦n.t.af' y� earing Examiner Decision Case No. V 97-145 Page 2 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A { verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division. UJ( HEARING TESTIMONY: cc 2! LU0' The following is a summary of the testimony offered at the public hearing. C3 w X.. From the City: F'`LU Karissa Kawamoto, Project Planner, reviewed the staff advisory report (Exhibit A) and wW o recommended a modified approval the request. From the Applicant: D o Rob Michel, applicant, submitted Exhibits B, C, D & F into the record. He read from X u% Exhibit F which outlined his arguments and proposed changes to conditions a tom-;. recommended by City staff in Exhibit A. WW Dennis Bruce, PE, applicant's engineer, discussed the geotechnical report (Attachment 7 to Exhibit A) and testified that from an engineering standpoint there would be no hazard o y to the slope or to other properties if the proposal is built in accordance with the o t= recommendations found in the geotechnical report. UJ Jay Young, real estate broker, submitted Exhibits F & G into the record and testified that W in his opinion the 15 foot setback from the top of the slope, as recommended by staff, U would place an unnecessary financial hardship on the owner of the lot because of view o impacts. z l From the Community: No one from the general community spoke at the hearing. ! CORRESPONDENCE: One letter objecting to the request was received (Attachment 8 to Exhibit A). FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 3 0 A. SITE DESCRIPTION 1. Site Development And Zoning: a. Facts: 1) Size: The subject property is approximately 17,952`square feet (see Exhibit A, Attachment 7). j 2) Land Use: The subject property is undeveloped and vacant. 3) Zoning: The subject property is located in a Single -Family Residential { (RS-12) zone (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1),�° 4) Terrain and Vegetation: The steep slope critical area is located in the southern portion of the property. It contains dense vegetation, shrubs, d,!' 'huh°Xf �(yf -- •'x.. 0 _ y!� •rt 9 ! Eby of +G-i r`" 1 ""�' CHearing Examiner Decision Case No. V 97-145 Page 8 9. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 10. The permit is transferable. _; Entered this 21" day of January, 1998, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner -� t- u. under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. � w 0� 2F i g Ji fal V Ron McConnell z i.- Hearing Examiner F- O z W W m' RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS 0 The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and _ U appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should U- _a contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. N REQUEST FOR RECONSMERATION Section 20.100.010.E allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. APPEALS Section 20.105,020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or O recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the decision being appealed. ® LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.' earing Examiner Decision Case No V 97-145 Page 9 NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County, Assessors Office. EXiEIIBITS: The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record. A. Planning Division Advisory Report B. Detailed list of houses built in previous seven years (from Snohomish County records) C. Site plan for house proposed to be located on Lot 3 (adjacent to the subject lot). D. Site plan for Clay/Kerr and Schoner/Dulin homes (V-96-43 & V-96-41). E. Copy of Rob Michel's hearing comments. F. Two plat maps submitted by Jay Young- G. Copy of Jay Young's hearing comments. H. Viewfoii showing staff recommended 15 foot building setback. I. Floor plans of Clay/Kerr & Schoner/Dulin homes.. PARTIES of RECORD: Rob Michel 8022 21P St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Dennis Bruce, PE 17814 - 8d` Ave. NW Shoreline, WA 98177 Jay Young 18810 92"d Ave. W Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds Planning Division Edmonds Engineering Division k e n C] PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: Ron M nn 1, Hea in xaminer From: Kawal oto ari�sq Project Planner Date: JANUARY 9, 1998 File: V-97-145 MR. DENNIS O'LEARY Hearing Date, Time, And Place: January 15, 1998, 9:30 AM Edmonds City Hall: 121 5th Avenue North TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................2 A. APPLICATION...............................................................................................................................................2 B. RECOMMENDATIONS ................2 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................... 3 A. SITE DESCRIPTION ............ :.......................................................................................................................... 3 B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA)....... ................ ............................................. I ...... I ................ 3 C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE........................................................3 4 D. COMPLIANCE WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA.....................................................................................................4 E. COMPLIANCE WITH REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION CRITERIA........................................................................4 F. CONCLUSIONS FOR VARIANCE....' 5 G. CONCLUSIONS FOR REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION........................................................................................5 H. 'TECHNICAL COMMITTEE...........................................................................................„.................................6 L COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC).......................................................................... ............6 J. COMMENTS...................................................................................................................................................7 K. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS.............................................................................................................................7 III. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS ............................. ............ 8 A. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION...............................................................................................................8 '. B. APPEALS......................................................................................................................................................8 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL........................................................................................................8 V. NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR............................................................................ 8 i; VI. ATTACHMENTS ........................... VII. PARTIES OF RECORD............................................................................................... r ...8 V-97-145.SRP / January 9,1998 / Staff Report Dennis O'Leary File No. V-97-145 Page 2 of 7 I. INTRODUCTION A. Application Z J 1. Applicant: Mr. Dennis O'Leary (see Attachment 2). i� 2. Site Location: Lot 2 of Short Plat S-28-79; 84xx Olympic View Drive (see Attachment 1). �1 3. Request: A reasonable use variance to reduce both the required 50 foot critical area buffer to UJ U zero and 15 foot building setback from the critical area buffer to zero, to allow the LJ 0, Cn LCn construction of a 2,100 square foot house and 900 square foot garage (see Attachments 2 and U 3). � 11—` 4. Review Process: Variance: Hearin Examiner conducts g pubIic hearing and makes final � C? w decision. 5. Maior Issues: : a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030 U 4 j { (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Development Standards). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85 tom— (VARIANCES). Z It—?; �?. c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter Z 20.15B.040.C. (REASONABLE USE) w wi j B. Recommendations pBased on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report we recommend a o MODIFIED APPROVAL of the variance and reasonable use request. Staff suggests approval of = w the request to eliminate the 50-foot critical area buffer but maintain the 15 foot building setback LLF: from a critical area requirement, subject to the following conditions: Z L Flag top of slope identified by the October 1997 topographic survey performed by Chadwick UJ N & Winters prior to any construction activity. pt— 2. For construction purposes, a 10 foot activity easement within the 15 foot building setback will Z be allowed. A construction sequence plan is to be provided with the building permit w application to demonstrate intrusions into the activity easement and proposals for restoration. 3. Install a temporary chain link fence along the limits of construction to protect the critical area slope from intrusions. 4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, a Critical Area Tract and Notice on Title (supplied by the City) of the critical area and buffer per ECDC 20.15B.160.A.&B. must be recorded with r: Snohomish County. 5. All design and construction activity shall adhere to the suggestions and recommendations made in the geotechnical report byJ1obetf7Pruce P.E. 6. Any future expansion, additions, ac esss� o�tructures etc. must comply with standard zoning setbacks or apply for variances. 7. Compliance with the original short plat conditions of approval (see attachment 7). 8. The applicant must obtain all necessary permits prior to any construction. 9. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances. 10. The permit should be transferable. V-97-145.SRP t January 9, 19951 Staff Report f 71,'� O U. Dennis O'Leary File No. V-97-145 Page 3 of 7 II. FINDINGS OF FACE' AND CONCLUSIONS A. Site Description 1. Site Development And Zoning: a) Facts: (1) Size: The subject property is approximately 17,952 square feet (see Attachment 7). (2) Land Use: The subject property is undeveloped and vacant. (3) Zonine: The subject property is located in a Single -Family Residential (RS-12) zone (see Attachment 1). (4) Terrain and Veaetation: The steep slope critical area is located in the southern portion of the property. It contains dense vegetation, shrubs, blackberry and trees. The northern portion has a moderate rise with fewer trees and the ground is covered by grass. 2. Neighboring Development And Zoning: (1) Fact: The properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-12) and either vacant or are developed with single-family homes (see Attachment 1). B. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 1. L. Variances granted based on special circumstances are exempt from SEPA review (WAC 197-11-800(6)(b) and ECDC 20.15A.080). C. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance 1. Critical Areas Compliance a) Facts: (1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.15.E (Critical Areas Ordinance). (2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist (CA-97-236) and it was determined that a study was required. b) Conclusion: The survey and top of slope determination dated October 1997 was done by Robert Winters P.L.S. of Chadwick and Winters. A geoteehnical report dated November 4, 1997 was performed by Dennis Bruce, P.E. It supports the request to construct within the critical area building setback and buffer. 2. Compliance with RS-12 Zoning Standards (1) Fact: The short plat (S-28-79) declared this property a flag lot. Current policy in regards to flag lot setbacks is to consider all setbacks as "side" setbacks. (2) Conclusion: The structure as proposed will comply with the requirements of the RS- 12 zoning standards. �aI't r t o s h t ,� t ffla y U {• � + y � ( ! nt .rh y a i .. z� e ; f '}� ,� t 5 �_ y�3 i - ! �l f , Dennis O'Leary Fite No. V-97-145 Page 4 of 7 D. Compliance with Requirements for Variance (1) Fact: ECDC Section 20.15B.180. establishes the criteria (special circumstance and the minimum variance necessary) with which a Critical Area Variance may be granted by the Hearing Examiner. The applicant has submitted declarations with their submittal which address the variance decisional criteria as follows (see Attachment 3):. W. cc :� (a) Special Circumstances (applicant statement): Because of the special UJU1 circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, U �� topography, location of surrounding steep slopes, strict application of this Cn W J. title would deprive the subject property all reasonable use of the property. -J � t See attached plot plan showing a building area of only 486 square feet. wU. (b) Minimum variance, not materialiv detrimental (applicant statement): The granting of this variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the � development proposal which is a building area enjoyed by other lot owners cud. in the area. This proposal will not be materially detrimental to the public W welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated because development will follow the Z 1-.. engineer's guidelines and described in the attached Geological report. The H• d proposed development is not contrary to the goals and purposes of the Z W UJI chapter. 75 5 0 U o � E. Compliance with Requirements for Reasonable Use Exception s W (1) Fact: ECDC Section 20.15B.040(C) establishes the decisional criteria for a i. Reasonable Use Exception approval by the Hearing Examiner. Criteria number 7 u. O states that a reasonable use exception may only be applied for if a variance pursuant Z to ECDC Section 20.15B.170(A). V � (a) Denial of Reasonable Use (applicant statement): This chapter would deny 0 ~ all reasonable use of the subject property because Chapter 20.15B.110 of the Edmonds Community Development Code requires a fifty (50) foot wide buffer from geological hazardous areas and section 20.15B.080 (C) requires a fifteen (15) foot building set back from any required buffer. Please see attached drawing which leaves only 486 square feet of building area. (b) No other reasonable use consistent with zoning (applicant statement): There is no other reasonable use consistent with the underlying zoning with less impact on the critical area or its buffer, either primary or permitted t secondary uses. (c) No unreasonable threat to public (applicant statement): The proposed development will not pose any threat to the public health, safely or welfare on or off the property because the proposed single family residence will be built in accordance with the Geotechnical Engineer's guidelines. All development will be performed within the property lines with strict controls to prevent any debris or material encroaching onto adjacent properties. (d) Minimum reduction of critical area to allow for reasonable use (applicant statement): The proposed alteration to the critical area and its buffer will be minimized as much as possible to allow a reasonable building area as enjoyed by existing lot owners in the area. No building is planned in the 40% slope area and the proposed building will be set back approximately 25 feet from the west property line. V-97-145.SRP t January 9,19981 Staff Report x y £" y ,t MIs7'h.5 -Z"oVt�4�<rz ,S9 �� 3 1 i t.'T l'•' L f4 t- /ry, i La' 1 t £ �" _� t t r t L'? Dennis O'Leary Pile No. V-97-145 Page 5 of 7 (e) Compliance with all other State and Federal laws (applicant statement) The proposed activity complies with all state local and federal laws. No sediment or pollution challenges. No floodplains involved. Wastewater to be removed from site through city sewer system. (f) Reuested Reasonable Use Exception is not due to any current or previous owners action (applicant statement): Since the lot was platted and recorded in 1981, the economic use deficiency was created after the effective date of the adoption of this new ordinance. F. Conclusions for the variance criteria: (a) The site has both an upward and downward slope. The critical slope virtually splits the subject property in half. After the critical area buffer, the additional building setback from the buffer, and the standard setback from the other property lines, a small, odd shaped building envelope remains. (b) The building footprint proposed by the applicant is very substantial. A 2,100 square foot floor plan with a 900 square foot attached garage. As proposed, the garage would be up to the top of slope identified by the geotechnical study and a side property line setback to the east, but the majority of the home appears to be at least 15 feet away from the top of slope. Changes in layout or angle of the garage will be necessary to meet a 15 foot building setback from the top of slope. The geotechnical report does indicate a very stable slope and construction can occur anywhere on the property with proper techniques and materials. G. Conclusions for the Reasonable Use criteria: (a) The size and location of the critical area is such that the use of the property is limited to a very small, odd shaped home. There may be design alternatives that would minimize the critical area buffer intrusion, however, an exception is necessary to allow some reasonable use of the property. (b) The RS-12 zoning designation limits development of the property to residential homes and accessory uses, similar to what is proposed. (c) The geotechnical evaluation performed by Dennis Bruce P.E. dated November 4, 1997 approved construction on the site subject to several conditions and recommendations. (d) The applicant has requested elimination of both the 50 foot critical area buffer and 15 foot building setback from a critical area buffer. The proposed home and garage appear to be fairly large in size, utilizing the majority of available space before the top of slope line and property line setbacks. Different floor plan layouts may achieve a building similar in size but could minimize any critical area intrusion. (e) The proposal will comply with all Federal, State and local laws and ordinances with the exception of these variance requests. 4 (f) The short plat which created this lot was processed in the late 70's, early , 80's, prior to adoption of the Critical Areas chapter of the ECDC. None of the lots from the short plat have had development requests to date. It does V-97-145.SRP / January 9, 1998 1 Staff Report P }�,y� .r� �r++�-&. �yl ..: .4�!ai {ii��t?.�CS3+[. �4f , DennisO'L.enry File No. V-97-145 Page 6 of 7 not appear as if the reasonable use exception or variance request is the result of the actions of the current or previous owners. H. Technical Committee a) Review by City Departments (1) Fact: The variance application has been reviewed and evaluated by the Fire Department, Public Works Division, Engineering Division, and the Parks and Recreation Division. No comments were received. I. Comprehensive Plan {ECDC} 1. Comprehensive Plan Designation a) Fact: The subject property is designated as "Single Family" residential on the comprehensive plan. b) Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. 2. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies a) Fact: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential Development section, identifies goals and policies which relate to "Residential Development" in the City. Specific goals and policies are discussed in detail below. (1) Section $ states as a Goal of the City that: "High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted...: . b) Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the above adopted goals and policies of the City for residential property in the City. c) Facts: The Soils and Topography section of the Comprehensive Plan identifies the following goal and policies: (1) Section C states as a Goal of the City that: "Development on steep slopes or hazardous soil conditions should preserve the natural features of the site, in accordance with the following policies:" 0) C. La. Grading, filling, and tree cutting shall be restricted to building pads, driveways, access ways and other imperious surfaces. (ii) C.l.b. Grading shall not jeopardize the stability of any slope, or of an adjacent property. J. Comments 1. On January 7, 1998, the City received a letter (attachment 8) from Mr. Robert Irwin who lives at 18119 85th PI W. Edmonds. His letter stated the following concern with the proposal: a) He is against any change to allow any crowding, encroachment or other placement that would allow a building to be placed where one would not be allowed now. K. Response to comments 1. The letter does not identify how this proposal does not meet the Reasonable Use Exception or variance criteria or provide reasons for staff to use in making a recommendation for denial. } V-97-145.SRP i January 9, 1998 / Staff Report , ., j t .._.. ....._..._.._. anrsvavflnnw owa+._,.s,..M.,..A,.w�r�,.«wa�a�e.,�.,.,«..,..,:.,....w,..«......,....»___�.__.�4'='..._. ......................,..�...__ Dennis O'Leary Pile No. V-97-145 Page 7 of 7 III, RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department z 4 for further procedural information. A. Request for Reconsideration tr gl, LU Section 20.100.010.E allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or V OG wI, recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial W decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or CuF} presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the to ti subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request most cite specific w ® references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. U<< B. Appeals z Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or 1.-!. recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the �1 decision being appealed along with the name of the project applicant and the date of the decision, wj the name and address of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, LUUJand reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with v the Community Development Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the O decision being appealed. IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL LLSection 20.85.020.0 states "The approved variance must be acted on by the owner within one year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for Vtts an extension of the time before the expiration and the city approves the application." h N z V. NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office. VI. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity / Zoning Map 2. Application 3. Declarations of the Applicant 4. Geotechnical Report by Dennis Bruce P.E. dated November 4, 1997 0 5. Topographic Survey by Chadwick & Winters dated November 7, 1997 6. Copy of Short Plat (S-28-79) recorded document 7. Copy of recorded Conditions of Approval for S-28-79 8. Letter dated received January 7, 1998 from Mr. Robert Irwin VII. PARTIES OF RECORD 1. Staff 2. Applicant 3. Mr. Robert Irwin 18119 85th Pl. W. Edmonds V-97-145.SRP / January 9; 1998 / Staff Report x P-1 ■ La 51 0 0 ❑ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ❑ COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ❑ HOME OCCUPATION ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT / STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE r EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER FILE #_ V''q 1- AF5 ZONE S -t 2 DATE 114,19'7 REC'D BY_� FEE_: I Z��RECEIPT# HEARING DATE KHE ❑ STAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC N TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ APPEALED APPEAL# Applicant Phone Address rvG �✓ Z l'q Z�1G: /�f $ �sf/ , L t?at� rd� Property Address or Location Z Q/ fC 1•-r,Ve Property Owner 'i Eye 1`3+e Phone Address 50 Aft d Agents C Phone Ca 2- 2 Address 2 Z ♦ Z'`�i '� C4,iO4-7 Tax Acc #4-3y� Doo OOl o a o I Sec. ' 7 �..__ Twp. � A vRng. D rE Legal Description L- o TJ '— ea ._ 7 f Details of Project or Proposed Use 1 l�L S �'�„ j� In, 4, lS l/AIK, IThe undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this aDD116stion. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNED/ AGENT Attachment 2 0 134 l7 5.. The .proposed activity complies with all state, local and federal laws. No sediment or pollution challenges. No floodplains involved. November. Wastewater to be removed from site through city sewer .system. z 4th, 1997 � z aI F 6. Since the lot was platted and recorded in 1981, (See attached Subdivision map and recording number Exhibit "D"), the economic use deficiency Community Services Department was created after the effective date of the adoption of this yc� Pianning/Building Division gf new ordinance. f City of Edmonds w� 7. We are applying for the reasonable use exception along with a 121 5th Avenue �a variance pursuant to ECDC 20.15B.170(A). gO Edmonds. Washington 98020 20.15B.170 Dear Planner: Re: Reasonable Use Exception. A. Variances. zo z x I. Because of the special circumstances applicable to the subject 1. This chapter would deny all reasonable use of the subject ? r property, including size, shape, topography, location of surrounding z oj; property because Chapter 20.I5B.110 of the Edmonds Community tz �'. steep slopes,. strict application of this title would deprive the subject Development Code requires a Fifty (50) foot wide buffer from property all reasonable use of the P P Y property. See attached plot plan o geological hazardous areas and section 20.15B.080 (C) requires a m (Exhibit "A") showing a building area of only 486 square feet. e F Fifteen (15) foot building set back from any required buffer. Please o see attach drawing (Exhibit "A") which leaves only 486 square feet of F w 2. The granting of this variance is the minimum necessary to r = a building area. LL accommodate the development proposal which is a building area m 2. This is no enjoyed by other lot owners in the area. This proposal will not be other reasonable use consistent with the underlying u — materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the o zoning with less impact on the critical area or its buffer, either o� property of improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the z primary or permitted secondary uses. z property situated because development will follow the engineer's 3. The proposed development will not pose any threat to the public guidelines and describe. in the attached Geological report (Exhibit B"). The proposed development is not contrary to the goals and health, safety or welfare on or off the property because the proposed purposes of the this chapter. single family residence will be built in accordance with the Geotechincal Engineer's v— guidelines (See attached report Exhibit "B"). All development will be performed with the property lines with Thank you for your consideration. strict controls to prevent any debris or material encroaching onto Sincerely, O adjacent properties. O 4. The proposed alteration to the critical area and its buffer will be minimized as much as possible to allow a reasonable building area as enjoyed by existing lot owners in the area. No building is planned in ,� Dennis V. O"Leary the 40%+ slope area and the proposed building will be set back 1,3. ® approximately 25 feet from the west property line. See attached ®: proposed building location (Exhibit "C"). f Attachment 3 ;:O i )i L: 3z;! y 4. 0 *,❑.# 04➢ . ,. S;an,. DEC, 0 0 1997 PEAMI ~ Cop; 0 1 _ Attachment 5 �r r J �Ao.oa W U. LU_ wo �UP s z_ a--. �o W W. oLU �-- 7C U L� _z LUW o~ z November 4, 1997 Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Chief Financial Officer Lynnwood Mortgage Corporation 6505 - 218th Street S.W., Suite 9 Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043 Subject: Geotechnicai Evaluation - Lots 2 and 3 Approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, WA This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnicai evaluation of the property at approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was necessitated by owner and developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. • Vicinity Map (figure 1) • Topographic Survey Map by Chadwick and Winters, of Lots 2 and 3 dated October, 1997 • Site photographs (available) It is understood that Lots 2 and 3 are part of an overall parcel containing Lot No. 1 with existing residence, and Lots 2, 3 and 4 (see Survey map and plot plans). This investigation deals with Lots 2 and 3 with regard to geotechnical slope issues. it is understood that property owner wishes to construct a single family residence on Lot 3 and another single family residence on Lot 2. No development or construction has occurred on either Lot 2 or 3 to date. Lots 2 and 3 contain a "flatter" portion, as well as a more steeply sloped rear ® (southerly portion). The flatter portions of the lots currently consist of lawn grasses, with a few mature trees. The steeper (southerly) portion of the lots are densely vegetated with shrubs, bushes and trees (see photographs). SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL 17814 8th Ave. N.W. - Shoreline, Washington 98177 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 Attachment 6 P 0 El Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page two While not within the scope of this evaluation, this engineer assessed the existing residence on Lot 1 for any geotechnical distress. No evidence of any foundation settlements or shifting were observed. Visual assessments of Lots 2 and 3 by this engineer throughout the past year revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No sliding, no creep, no shifting, nor any significant erosional degradation was observed on the overall property, including Lots 2 and 3. In order to augment existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were dug (by backhoe) under this engineer's observation on August 9, 1997. See soil test pit logs (attached). The findings of the four soil test pits (plotted on the Survey Topographic Map) were very similar. Namely: dense brown, silty send, to approximately three (3) to four (4) foot depths. Dense to very dense grayish brown weathered glacial till (hardpan). No ground water was present in any of the four soil test pits. All test pit walls remained vertical and stable throughout the excavated time frame (approximately two hours). GONCLUSIQNfi/REi:OtU MENQATl0NS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, Lots 2 and 3 are geotechnically approved for the proposed single family residences, subject to the following conditions: • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wail provided the drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use a friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • The foundations for the proposed structures may be placed anywhere on Lots 2 and 3, outside of the dashed top -of -bank survey area (see Topographic map). In other words, there are no geotechnical limitations to the proximity of the proposed residences and the top -of -slope line. (It is geotechnically 1*1 H. X Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page three possible, but not likely, to properly construct a foundation on the steeper portions of Lots 2 and 3. This would require uneconomic stabilizing techniques and methods). • To be clear, the geotechnical set -back distance to the top -of -bank dashed line is zero. It is understood that political or zoning set -back distances do apply per City of Edmonds requirements. It is important to restate, however, that no set- back distance is essential for geotechnical reasons. If desired, exceptions or variances could be pursued. • Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have Minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We ■ 0 Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page four recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: J Ft Parameter Design Value w O Coefficient of Friction 0.55 2 � Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: _ a x:. z �'` (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. �- o z �-, (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. W UJ: v uJ o We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the w foundation's resistance to lateral loading. r F. U. z' SLABS-®N-GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils z or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDAI[ION AND RMIN1NG WALLS; Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral o earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for wails less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value ® Active Earth Pressure* 30 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f. Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page five Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). LU The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and — z I o retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing z the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and o LU W sliding. OC ;7- The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above z lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will ULU Co !E need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the .4 appropriate design earth pressures. 0 z Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill 01 Backf ill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi 0 and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains Mr. _`0 0 Dennis V. O'Leary Page six recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in any of the test pits during the field work. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page seven The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. W of � � ,d.Q�,�, Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting with City of Edmonds building officials and inspectors. (n d, Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent z ~ retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to z o support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. 0 — a �. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or W , near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of IUL — fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and v compaction process. gjThe allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Minimum Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs or walkways 95% 0 Behind retaining walls 90% Beneath pavements 951% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page eight Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is renter W than the optimum moisture content. s ? "-' ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a Z granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage w; a of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil Cn passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. W W The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acce2jable if the upper x L) organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering o z. inspection. DRAINAGE CONIROLS: o z No drainage problems were evident on Lots 2 and 3. Surface runoff flows generally westerly (from the flatter portions of the lots). This engineer recommends compliance with the City of Edmonds standard storm water drainage controls. The surficial sandy soils are such that it is practical to utilize an Infiltration storm water system. 011 All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. M. 9R ® The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer durirtq_construction: • Soil cuts • Foundation subgrade verification Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary Page nine .:� • Any retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement and compaction • Subsurface drainage installation z U 0 a w x LL W U 0 z E • The two proposed single family residences (on Lots 2 and 3) are geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and key geotechnical inspection during construction. • There are no geotechnical constraints limiting the proximity of the proposed residences to any sloped portion of the property. As a practical measure, this engineer recommends the residences be situated no further southerly than the dashed tap -of -slope line. If desired, however, it is geotechnically feasible to construct the residences beyond (more southerly) than the dashed survey line. Prior to the City of Edmonds issuing a building permit, this engineer should review the specific house plans for compliance with the recommendations of this geotechnical report. The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. if conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer 195 RW I 11 t D ;■ 0. 0 a LU U. 1 di 0 z Dennis M• Bruce, RE. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer 7' r P/ 7 SOILS - FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION DRAINAGE • DESIGN& PERMIT • LEGAL 17814 8th Ave, N.W. • Seattle, Washington 98177 (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-84142 i0/'O�R,4PH/S SUr9l/�Y A PO• fAT/ON OF Tl=?,4 CT 1. EDMON05 SEA �/EW TF7,4 CTS SNO• HOM/SH CO• LINTY, W,4 SH/NG TO+N w" Z UAOM lz N < ao-f cnta 0) t- z z w U O 0 w r- u. r O z � t irk 5z4ik'w fi{i r �i i'f y, t ,- -`� U ! Y CLERK 'a CITY' OF �' Civrc Ge:rtr:r r:dn:k: ' . tVazh 'atoll RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and described as follows; See Exhibit "B" have been divided under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec.12.10) File No. 5-28-79 subject to the following conditions and requirements: 1. Exhibit "C" Hold Harmless Agreement 2. Underground wiring to be provided in accordance with Ordinance#1387 with building permits. 3. Connection to city water and sanitary sewer system required with building permits. 4. Excavation and grading shall conform to the requirements outlined in Chaoter 70 of the Uniform Building Code with building permits. 5. Turn around required on all lots with building permits. ALL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. I/we certify that IJwe are the legal owner(s) of the property described above. I/we warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare the subdivision void and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of the }notes I haunty Auditor. / �--- �8 SIGNED: CGILo / jj asz1,d0z•isnV DATED this t day of ! ,,t 19 STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ss. On this day pprsonally appeared before me and i to me known to be the.indivi uals described in and who executed the wi hin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes 0 : 'lieken mentioned. ;, Given tindea 'iny'.hand and official seal this day of 12 ti .� _ 19 � ' : Notary Public in and for the State of Washingto "�•C'�i:,, ;;l�' �.�# residing ay �'•,>..,�;.,,.•o,, 81 31 ADO.161 ' 0 1 _u s�v}7trt ,x� m �u + rKK {K;�^�' Y Ys.*`,� .'Yz 4f}S,�r sE -'* A1 r n� s N, yit"•: `a, # � y. if ;,JJ}{."4jU �K�^�Y'.� kt}•�7 ;s•'t Y +,1 � t J,?Y!'.0 > .�.t ', �^fi� ! xr+._,�n Y � .1� � �' *^F C' jet y. ,5 .. � i ' ' ;z • , a T y t z � �Y x ...>«, ,.-,...aattizRRps+emr/ � �5" e,xwesnwewaz.mirr-. ♦. ` � �'i';,}. 1 a _. a Jr , FILE No. 'S-28-79 Q z EXHIBIT "C"� jOwners, and all persons having an y present or subsequent ownership interest in these lands o assigns of owners or other and the successors and the City having any said interest hereby agree that .y of Edmonds shall be held s in all respects from any and all claims for dame e$ harmless ' junetive relief which may be aces g for in to adjacent land stoned now or in the future L W`' or improvements b 3 operation and maintenance of the dainagensystem of eand hereby _ L( waive and release the City of Edmonds from -any and all claims ¢ �� for damages excluding damage caused solely by an act or a F omission of said City and w"' Y injunctive relief which the owners, ►s- - or their successors or assigns, may themselves have now` z the future by reason of the construction, or or in operation of said .drainage system. a and 0 z s- `_' AUTHORIZED .�; ? r0 i:ECOLPI)INIG t: CD =_s ' CITY h 1.1" N, ONDS Pale _l-= Of _E a t,i `„! 7i. t A N �x fist y� vOL V0 PAGE 419 t at { T;>'CC.0 �1a 7'rr`zsN r3y wtk�j3Fw4'tCY ..,� '+ xdk k'4H, '�,.§ sty t4.r c. ,x { j't, } :^nr ^.%nufF'Xxi 3KtriF st v �:t, , 5.. kr ?t+l' F+SNxyt.�Y..,Cdtz?r t "T' F<a,ia'k21�rif,xiC�i d'dt eaax,}*_;{ r ` v .,Lx t �W BOB IRWIN 18119 85TH PL. W. Ed o ds, WA. 98026 0 26 Today is the 4th day of January, 1998�.: . s , Planning Division City of Edmonds 121; Fifth Ave. Edmonds, WA.98020 Wi of Subject: file # V-97-145 Ui g Dear Planners: U. I am against any change in the Building Codes, as they now stand, to allow any . _ crowding, encroachment or other placement that would allow a building or structure to., be placed where one would not be allowed now. These measurements are critical and should notbechanged. I will not be in the country at the time of this meeting and cannot, L therefore, attend but a r expect that you will look out for my, and the other citizens of Edmonds that this variance s would affect, and deny this petition: U. 7 °z Thank you, I am U a1n6e� obe F.Irwin .fi ,, hrc• _ 'z rr 4 r t 23' d o i�a[Fy. AT o " G tl % .4 W y I 4-114-99 89.68 FROM -FIR0, AMERICAN TITLE EVER ID-42082932 MdwScari/Snohottaish (WA) Owner : loss Alovilannifer RTSQ : 03B -27N 1 •13 -SE CoOwner : APN :4346 000 048 06 03 Site Addr : 9209190t11 St SW Edmonds 98020 Street : $243,100 Mail Addr : 920910ft St SW Edmonds Wa 98020 Land : $100,000 Rec Date :09130196 LW4 : Quitclaim Total : $343,100 Price Loan Letyr4 : 00213 Aud Pee # : 714 Ln Amt c 1997 Tax : $4,273.10 AetualUse : Lender : Phone . Yest type : Married Persona lnII)p % Owned :100 Bldg Name : 03E27N13 Volume : 3 Page. 75 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached, I Unit &snot Zoning : Ra-12000 ZoningRest : M+rhdCode :520 am SubAat : Edmonds Sea View Tracts Duct : S03.00 Legal : BTAC 000 D-06 LOT 2 OF CMY OF ED SP Block : 6 PAGE 2,, Bedrooms :4 1;ddgSF : 2,951 LoMcm :.31 Year Bit : 1990 Bath FSH : 3 A J Lot SF :13,504 r Stories : 2 2nd SF : 464 Hearing : Forced BldgGrad : Vy Good. Fireplace : 2 3rd SF Roof . B1dgCond : Good Spa 4th SF View . Water&c : Public Units :1 BsmntSP : 621 WlFront : Sewer : Sower Owner : Pantalena Dennis E & Dorothea COowner Site Addr : 9221190th St SW Edmonds 98020 Mail Addr : 9221 190th St SW Edmonds Wa 98020 Nee Late : 03/00/91 Dwd : Warranty .Price : $405,000 Loap Aud Fee # : Ln Amt : ActualUse : tender : Yest Type . YntZyp Bldg Name :03E27N13 Land Use : 11101 Rea,Sgl Family Res,Detaobed,l Unit Zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode :520 SublPlat : Edmonds, Sea View Tracts Legal : i Ly, 000 Dos LOT i OF CITY' OF ED SP Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3,267 Bath F3H :3 1 A 1st S.c : 2,410 Stories :1 2nd SF Fireplace : 3 3rd SF Spa 4th SF Units :1 AsmntSF :857 A7SQ :03E 27N -13 -SE APN : 4346 000 048 05 04 Struct : $278,600 Land : $100,000 Total : $378,600 LetyCd :00213 1997 Tax :54,715.24 Phone % Owned :100 Volume :3 Page:75 Bhowt ZoningRest Ceflsua Trod - 503.00 Block :6 Lotdere :.32 Year Alt :1990 Lot SF :13,939 JWWO Heating : Forced BldgGrad : Vy Good Roof : BidgCond : Good View . WaterS7re : Public Rpront: sSo"r : Sewer M i It 0 E 0 %N 14-99 09■69 FROM.FIR AMERICAN TITLE EVER ID,42 92932 FACE 3i 1Kaimse aaa J Swohotfrish (WA) owner : MccaUumRobart AM) : 03$ -27N -13 =AIE CoOwner APN .434600006901 03 Site Addr :19620 94th Ave W Edmonds 99020 Struct : $264,700 Alail Addr : 19620 94th Ave W Edmonds WO 99020 Land : $145,000 Rea Date : 09100/83 Deed : Warranty Total : $409,700 Price : $106,362 Loan Ln Amt : LevyCd 1997 Tax : 00210 : $5,102.57 Aud Fee # Actual Use Lender Phone :425-775-2314 Yest intTjvp % Owned volume : :3 Page; 75 Bldg : 03227N13 Land Use • 11101 Rea,Sgl Family Ros,Detached,l Unit Basmnt ,Zoning : Rs-12000 Zoe est 14rhdCade Sub/Plat :520 : Edmonds Sea. View Tracts Tract : 503.00 Legal : BLK. 000 D-01 ALL TA PTN OF LOT 68 Block : 6 Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 4,051 LotAcres : Year Bit :1991 Bath F3H -2 1 11 ist SF 2nd SF : 1,810 : 494 Lot SF : Heating : Forced gftrBlt Bidgarad : Vy Good Stories Fireplace : 2 : 2 3rd SF Roof : BldgCond : Good spa 4th SF View : lWater4)v : Public Units : 1 BsmntSF : 1,747 wont: Sewer : Sewer Owner : Mefford Kati* CoOwner Site Addr : 19115 94th Ave W Edmonds 98020 Mail Addr :19115 94th Ave W Edmou& W''a 98020 Re:e Date Deed . Price Loan . Aud Fee # : Ln runt : ActualUse : Lender : Pest Type . IntTyp : Bldg Name :03E27N13 land Use :11101 RaS,S21 Fancily Res,De:tached,l Unit Zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode :520 Sub/Plat : Edmonds Sea View Tracts Legal : RLK 000 D-04 LOT 2 OF CITY OF Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 2,320 Bath M -.2 11 I 1st SF :1,b00 Stories :1 2nd SF fireplace 3rd SF spa 4th SF Units ;1 BsmntSF : 720 RTSQ :03E -27N -13 -SE APN : 4346 000 052 04 03 Struct : $143,300 Land : $99,000 Total : $232,300 LevyCd :OD213 1997 Tax : A893.16 Phone % owned volume :3 Page:75 Easannt ZoningRest .noes Tract :503.00 Block :4 LwAcre - .37 Year Bit :19991 Lot SF :16,117 EM4R]t Heating : Forced BldgGrad : Good Roof BldgCond : good View iWata$rc : Public WIFront : Smwer : Sewer w M U 0 a w x N U. O z �AN-&4-99 es.se FROM -FIR ANERICRN TITLE EVER Wa 82932 MietmScan I Staohowdsh (WA) Owner : Remick Ka= H R2$'Q : 033 -27N -13 1 cot?wner : APN : 5656 001010 02 01 Site Addr :18319 High St Edmonds 98020 Stunt : $130,200 Mail Addr :19319 High St F.dmnuds WA 98020 Land : $90.000 Ree Date :11/00/88 Deed : Warranty Total : $220,200 Price : $100,000 Loan LevyCd : 00210 Aud Fee 0 Ln Amt 1997 Tax : $2,742A6 AetualUse tender Phone Vest 2Jppe Int7yp % Owned : Bldg Name :03R27N13 Mime :9 Pal Land Use :11101 Res,Sgl Fam4y Rts,Dd&ched, l Unit Bann .Zoning : Rs-12000 ZoningRest Nbrhdcode ,520 Cenertc Sub/Plat : Seahurst Flat Of 2lract : 503.00 Legal : BT K 001 D-02 - PTN LTS 10M I ]DAP Block : 6 Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 2.384 Lat,lere : Year Blt Bath F3H :1 /1 /1 1st SF :1,456 Lot SF : EJWBlt stories : 1 2nd SF Heating : Basebrd BldgGrad Fireplace : 1 3rd SF Roof BldgCond Spa 4th SF View, . Watersre Units .1 BsmatV : 928 Wt%nt : sewer Owner : Goldsmith Garrett L cOOwner : Site Addr : Olympic View Dr Edmonds 98020 ail Addr : Olympia View Dr Edmonds Wa 98020 R to : 04/00/98 Deed : Wananty Price : $30,000 Loan Aud Fee # Ln Amt ActualUse : Miso a Lender Vest type IntTyp Bldg Name :03E27N13 Land Use : 19301 Res,Nou-Resid ' 'tu tore Zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode :520 Sub/Plat : Original plat North Edmunds Legal : BLK 041 D-02 - TH PTN LOTS 8 U BedroomsZBsmnt'gF F Bath F3FI /WISP StoriesF FYreplaceF SpaF Units :1 RTSQ :03B -27N -13 -SE APN : 5319 041008 02 09 Stmet :$900 Land : $80,100 Total : $81,000 LevyCd 002 1997 Tax .008.91 Phone olume :2 Page:75 Easmnt 2bningRestsus Cen Tract Block Lout • .35 Year fth : 1991 Lot SF 6 F�f i'rBlt Heating : BldgGrad .roof : IdgCond View , a a : Public WitFS ont : Sewer : Sewer y W M WE [=�4-99 09.69 FROM,FIRG AMERICAN TITLE EVER IDs4 S92932 ,�traScait l Snohoo&1t (RYA) : 03B -27N .13 -NS (,?weer : Mcdonald Jan APN APN : 5656 002 013 00 07 C*Oww Site Addr :18228 OlYnrpic View Dr Edmotuis 99020 Sduct Land ; S214,800 ; $216.000 Mail Addy : Olyaspic View Dr �Va 98020 Total : $430,800 Rec !.►ate o wanmdy ; 06too 06100183 J)vedLoan : 00210 P,0 : $1091000 lm Ant 199II 7CTas . $5,365.36 Aud Fee # : Lender, ; Phone : 425-171-4950 AcmalUse Vest type : Int7yp : % Owned Volume .9 Page: 90 Bldg Name :03EM13 11101 Ytes,Sgd FesoilY DZes.Uamchcd,l Unit Easmt , Land Use : Zon ftfiest Zoning : Rs-12000 cow A&*Xode :520 ?iact :503.00 Sub/Plat : Scalnmt Piet Of Block ; 6 Legal : BLK 002 D-00 - LOT 13 Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3,507 :1,414 LotAcre lot SF Bath F3H .2 A A 1st SF 2nd SF : 1,306 Heating : Forced Stories Fireplace : 2 :2 3rd SF Roof : spa 4th SF BsmntSF : 797 view Wront : Units :1 Owner : Wagner Mark '/Suzann D Caowner Site Addr : 18324 Olympic View Dr Edmonds 98020 Mail Addr :18324 O1Yv*c View Dr $020 c Dare : : $499$499,000 PLt1 Deed Warrenty Loan : Convaotional Price Pr Aud Fee # : 513 La Ant : $350,000 Lender : Pioneer Sv$s Bk ActualUse : intTyp Vest Type Bldg Name : 03E27N13 11101 Res.S21 FacnHY Res,Detached,l Unit Land Use : Zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode .520 SublPlat : Seahurst Flat Of BLK 002 D-00 - LOT 8 St3BJ ESE Legal : Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF . 4,946 1st SF :1,510 Bath F3H .3 1 A 2nd SF :1.458 stories ,Rreplace -2 : 3 3rd SF Spa :Yes 41h SF BsmntW :1,979 Units :1 PAGE S/ .Fear 191t :1990 pjYrBlt BldgOrad : Good B1dgCond : Good Watersro : Public sewer : Seaver RTSQ :03E -27N -13 NE APN : 5656 002 008 00 04 Struct : $310,500 Land : $274,000 Total : $584.500 Levycd 00210 1997 : $7,279.60 Phone % owned -100 volume :9 Page: 90 Bastnnt ZoningRest Tract :503.00 Block :6 LotRcre : Lot SF : Heating : Forced Roof : View . Wipront : Year Blt :1994 SJYMt B1dgorad : Vy Good Bldgand : Good Ware ft : Public Sewer : Sewer r h z M 0 0 a w F- U. V ti 0 z 0 n rM-44-98 09.59 FROM.FI AMERICAM TITLE EVER ID.4 92832 PAGE Bi Mtd*vSican I S'/ioi/WI uh (WA) Owner ! Sbanks Scott CoOwner Site dddr ;18404 Olympic View Dr Edmonds 98020 Mail Addr :18404 Olympic View Dr Edmonds Ws 98020 Ree Date : 08/00/86 Deed : Warranty Price : $210,000 Loan : Aud Fee # Ln Amt : Actual Use : Lender : Val Type Int2yp : Bldg Name :031S27N13 Land Use :11101 Re:s,Sg1 Family Res,Detached,l [Tait Zoning : Rs-12000 NhrhdCode :520 SublTlat : Seaburst Plat Of Legal : BLK 002 D-02 - N 30FT LT 5 ALL LOT R2SQ :038 27N -13 -NE AM : 5656 002 005 02 05 Strad : $530,000 .Land : $306,000 Total : $836,000 Le►yCd :00210 1997 Tax : $10,411.88 Phone % Owned vohrme :9 P4ge:90 Basmnt zoningRest r Tract : 503.00 Block :6 Bedrooms :3 BMW -6,175 Lor4cre : Year Bit :1991 Both F3H -2 /2 /1 Ist BF :3,199 Lot SF : Effi'rBlt Storks : i 2nd SF Heating ; Forced NldgOrad : Special Fireplace : 4 3rd SF Roof B1dgCond : Vy Good Spa 41h SF Y70W WaterB re : Public Units : 1 BsmntSF : 2,976 Wiftnt: Sewer : Sma Owner : Porter Frank Mary L CaOwner Site Addr : 18824 Olympic View Dr Edmonds 98020 Mail Addr :18924 Olympic View Dr Edmonds Wa 09020 Ree Date : 11/02/93 Deed ; Warranty ?rice : $180,000 Pull Loan : Conventional Aud Fee # : 674 Ln Amt : $144,000 ActualUse : Len*r : Miscellaneous Yest Type : Married Persons IntTyp ; Fixed Bldg Name : 03E27N13 Land Use : I1101 Res,Sgl Family RAMDetach4l. Unit Zoning : Ra-12000 NbrhdCode :520 Buwlat Legal : RT-7) BEG NE COIL LT 3 TH S01052 QOE RTSQ :05E -27N -13 -SE APN :1327 034 009 00 04 Btruet : $150,600 Land : $118,000 Total : $268,600 LevyCd :00210 1997 Tax : $3,345.25 Phone :425 771-2102 9a Owned :100 Vahan Page: Easmnt ZoningRest ue Duct :503.00 Block :6 Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 2.744 LotAcre :.36 Year Bit : 1995 Bath F3H : 1 A /1 Ist SF :1,939 Lot SF : 15,682 JWrB1t Starks : 2 2nd SF : 805 Heating : Forced BldgGrad : Mghlavg Fireplace : 2 3rd SF Roof B/dgCond : Good Spa 4th SF Kew Water&c : Public Units : I BsmnrSF WYont . Sewer : Sewer z �O ut w% o tt UJ = CCU' u. Cj _z ui rA u� d r z C7 AN-14-913 10.00 FROM.FIR AMERICAN TITLE EVER 10-420682932 MetmSew l Shohowish (WA) Owner : Bums Charles I/Sandra C RTSQ : 03i3 27N -13 -SE CoOwner : APN : 4231000 005 00 03 Me dddr :19226 Olympio View Dr Edmonds 98020 Stmet : $174,300 Mail Addr :19226 Olympic View Dr Edmonds Wa 98020 Land : $84,500 Ree Date : 06/19/96 Deed : 'Warranty. Total : $258,800 Price : $399,950 Full Loan : Conventional LevyCd : 00210 Aud Fee # : 69 Ln Amt : $309,000 1997 Tax : $3,223.20 dclualUse : Lander : Mortgage Svc Phone Vest Type : Joint Tenant AtTyp : Fixed % Owned :100 Bldg Name . 03E27N13 Vohtme : 31 Page: 75 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sg1 Family RrA.Detwhed,l Unit E IMI Zoning : Ra-12000 ?.oninc•Rest NbrhdCode :520 Qbw SublPlat : C hittenden'S Addition Tract : 503.00 Legal : BL K 000-D00 - LOT S TOW UND 1/7 w Block : 6 Bedrooms :2 Bldg SF : 2.588 LotAcre :.36 Bath MY :1 /1 /1 1st SF :1,940 Lot SF :15,682 Stories : 2 2nd SF : 648 Heating : Forced Fireplace : 3 3rd SF Roof Spa 41h SF View Units :1 Armn1SF Wrong: Owner : Piukbatn Tlwum S lii & Linda J COOwner Site Addr : 18606 Sound View Fl Edmonds 98020 Mail Ad& : 316 Main St #B Edmonds Wa 98020 Rea Date :11100196 Deed : Warranty Price : $135,000 Loans dud Fee # Ln Amt : Actual0se Lender Vest Type pnt2yp ; Bldg Name :03E27N13 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl family Res,Detached,l Unit Zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode :520 SublPlat : Edmonds Sea View Tracts Legal : BLK 002 D-00 LOT 2 OF MY OF EDM Bedrooms .5 Bldg SF : 4,072 Bath FM : 4 1 A 1St SF : 2,494 Stories : 1 2nd SF Fireplace : 1 3rd Sl: Spa : Yes 41h SF Units :1 BSmnff :1,S88 Year Bit :1990 WrBlt BtdgGrad : Good B14gCond : Good Water&c : Public Sewer :Sewer mg :03E -27N -13 NE APN : 4346 002 005 00 06 Strad : $298,400 Land : $330,000 Total : $628,400 Le►yCd :00210 1997 Tax : $7,826.34 Phone % Owned : Volume :3 Page:75 &stunt ZmingRest Census TYad : S03.00 Block :6 LotAcre :.31 LotSF :11.504 Heating: Best Pump Roof View Wi:Pront: Year Blt :1993 E`YrB1t BldgGrad : Vy Good OldgCond : Good WaiterSro : Public Sewer : Sewer F y „E a t 1! 0 is.bl.>.,...:.{q.„d.4'3.:>}r..Uiri�Y ka�wsld8rinkih{.'�du2!..'�a.1n:r1�Yan:.s•'Y3d+.'Cl'b.SfY`�+��S:An.'.+Y�p7ui«Adnli,�fx.�C.d�L1Ci�.>CtSL.'itc..rif0,`ax2ui�t1'i�{�Y�nf�;»%"c�ufYitit;w�'L�LS+,itfi'J31N:....�'nMlw'.L,.a1.',,i..'�3:1vah.a.rsn»{vx', .. AN-44-88 10.00 PROM%PIR AMERICAN TITLE EVER I0.4 82932 PAGE Ai Afewsam l Snohomish (WA) Omer t R>micel Arthur P/Ann 1. RTSQ t 03k3 27N -i 3 -NB .lPN .4346 002 OM 00 08 CoOwlser Site Addy 18617 Sound VieW Pl Edmonds98020 ,Struct : $302,300 $340,600 Marl Addr : 739 Elm pi Edmonds Wa 99020 Land : Total : $642,900 Rec Date : 09/25191 Deed : Warranty I.evyCd : 00210 I Price : $332,000 Ftt11 Loan Ln Amt : 107 Tax : $8.006.93 Aud Fee # : 556 Lander Phow ActualUse tnt7jp 3b Owned :1tj0 Vest Type Yalnme : 3 pQy'e= 75 Bldg Name Land Use : O3F27N13 : i1101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detaehed,1 Unit Wt ? zoning : Rs-12000 go DOW NbrhdCode Su&/Plat :520 : Edmonds Sea view TUC% Tr :503.00 Legal : BIX 002 D-00 LOT 2 CITY OF EDMONDS Block : b Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3.599 Lotllere : ,42 Year Bit :1993 rBlt Lot SF :18,295 Z`jji' 71 BathF3H :2 AJ4 1st SF :2,493 2nd SF : 1.106 . Heating : Forced Bldgt3rad : Vy Good Stories : 2 3rd SF f Bddgtrand :Good Far lace :1 dth SF view a erft Public SP Units :1 BsmndSF WtFlront : Sewer i OWner : Scholten John D;Smith Lynn B RTSQ : 04B -27N -18 NE APN : 1827 041 OS100 01 tAOWner Site Addr : 8220184th St SW Edmonds 98626 Mruct : $122,900 $105,600 Mail.Addr : 401 Pine St #102 Edmonds Wa 98020 Lariat : $228,500 Rea Date : 07/25/94 Deed : Quit Claim Loan :ConYendonal Total : Le►y Cd : 00217 Price Aud Fee It.153 Ln Amt : $10S.000 1997 Tax : $2,791.45 3 Actuaitlse Lender : Us Svgs Bk lnfl, p : Adjustable Phone Owned : 1O0 Vest Type : Marncd persons volume page - Bldg Name Land Use : 0027N18 :11101 RMS91 Family Res,Detaohed,l Unit @asmnt 'toning : Rs-1200000M 2'aningRest : `t NbrhdCode :520 ?Tact :503.00 SublPiat Legal : RT 13A-2) BEG SE CORN112 NW'1/4 Block : 1 Bedrooms : 2 Bldg SF : 2,488 Lotdcre :.88 Year Blt .1995 Lot SF : 38,333 EJj i'rBlt Bath F3X : 2 / 1 1st SF : 1,222 2nd SF : 528 Heating : Forced ShWrad : Highlavg Stories :2 3rd SF Roof BldgCond ; Good Fireplace : 1 4th SF View WaterSrc Pula ' Spa BsmntSF :738 Wti�iona: Sewer :Sewer n : 1 ip ; r w M v O 0 w U. v r O z n M r7 a PAGE 9i 1-14-99 10.00 PROM.IFIRS-AMERICAN TITLE EVER 10,42 92932 llietr.ac" I Sttohemish (WA) Owner : Adams lamas W & Unet L RTSQ APN : 04E -27N -18 -NW : 4346 000 00910 04 CoOwner gyre Addr : 8514184th St SW Edmnds 99026 Sbuct : $199,900 Maid Addr : S5141840u St SW Edmonds Ws. 98026 Land Total : $98,000 : $297,900 Rec Date Deed Loan :00217 Price La Amt 1997 Tau: : S3,639.27 A ud Fee # Lender : Phone :425-776.2285 AudFeese LntTyp : 9& Owned : Vest Type Volume : 3 .Doge: ?5 Bldg Name Land Use :04E27N18 :11101 Res,Sgl Family Rcs.Detwhe4.l unit Easoult Zoning : Rs-12000 t NbrhdCode :520 Tract SuMPlat : Edmonds Sea View Tracts S 14 49FT OF Block : t Legal : BLK 000 D-10 LOT 2 m Bedrooms : 4 BldgSF : 3,760 Bath FM :2 A A 1st SF :1.692 Stories : 2 2nd SF :1,276 Fireplace .3 3rd SF S 41h SF Units :1 BsmntSF - 792 Owner : Buslach Brad K CoOwner 8821 188th St SW Edmonds 98426 Site Addr Mail Addr : : 8821 188th St SW Edmonds Wa 98026 Rec Date .05100190 Price : $325,000 Loan : And Fee 0 Ln Ami Actual Use Lender Vest Type AtTyp Bldg Name :04E27N18 Family Res,Detached,l Unit Land Use :11101 Res,Sgl zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode :520 Sub/Plat Edmonds Sea View Tracts Legal : BLK 000 D-06 LOT 2 CITY ED SP Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 2.640 Bath F3H -.2 1 A 1st SF :1,825 Stories : 1 2nd SF Fireplace : 2 3rd SF Spa 4th SF Units :l BsmntSF :815 LatAcre : •28 Year Bit :1995 Lot SF :12,197 4i'rBlt Hearing : Forced BldgGrad : Mgh\avg Roof BldgCond : Good View Wat&A* : Public WtFront : Sewer : Sewer R Q : GM -27N -18 NW APN : 4346 000 036 06 07 Struct : S177,100 Land : $85.000 Total : $262,100 L,evyCd :00217 1997 Tax : $3.201.92 Phone % Owned Volume :3 Page:75 F49mat ZoningRest Cenr Tract :503.00 Block :6 LotAcre : Year Bit : 1990 Lit SF E�'YrBlt Heating : Forced B1dgGrad : Good Roof BldgCond : Good View Water5rc : Public WtFront : Sewer I: Sewer F� N MM, -wkw IMINA AGV-, AN-14-88 10.01 FROM-FIRJ&AMERICAN TITLE EVER ID-42082832 F MetmS=x1Snvhe&j1sh (WA) Owner : KrICH Philip 0 R7W :04B -27N -18 -NW C00WRer : , APN : 4346 000 036 01 02 SIMAddr : 88201 Oft St SW E&M& 98026 $&Uct -.$191,700 Mail Addr -. 8829 188th St SW Edmonds Wa 98026 Land !$37,000 RwDare :11100/89 Deed warranty Total :$278.700 price :$292,000 Loan LevyCd :00217 dud Fee # Ln Amt 1997 Tax :$3AN.71 Actualuse Lender phone :425-771-4178, Vest Type fnfi)p % Owned Bldg Name -M27NIS volume 3 Page: 75 Land Use : 11101,Re0g1F&m0yPW*PetWA41 Unit BaoW Zoning : Rs-12000 ZonirsgRart JOrkdCade : S20 Qwla 4wblPfat : FAm*n& Sea view Tracts 7hut :503.00 Legal BLK 000 D-01 - LOT I CrrY ED SP Akwk 6 Bedrooms 3 Aldg SF :2,892 LorAcra ; Peter Bit :1990 Bath M 2 / /I Istsp :1.331 Lot SF : A . fiTrBit Stories -.2 2nd$F :1,561 Reating : Foroed, Bidgarad Good Fireplace 2 3rd9F Roof BidgCond Good Spa 4th SF View Watarft Public Units I hmnrsp Wront. sewer Sawa Owner ; Wurderrian Richard D/Trui L RTS9 :04B 27N .19 -NW CoOwner : APM ; 4346 000 036 05 08 SjjeAddr : 89191 88th St SW Edmonds 99026 S&Wd :$188,400 MaIlAddr -. 891918881 St SW Edmunds W& 99026 Land :$80.000 Rec Date :10/25/96 Deed - Warranty Total :$277.400 Price :5373.000 Loan : Conventiaml LevyCd :00217 Aud Fee # :415 LnAmt $275.000 1997 Tax :S3,388.83 Actualuse : Lender Waddngton Fed Sv Phone Vest Type : Married Persons lnflyp Fixed % Owned :100 Bldg Name :04E27NI8 volume 3 Page: 75 Land Use I 1101 Res.Sgi Family Res)Detacbed.1 Unit Earmnt Zoning Rs-12000 zoningfiest XbrhdCade :520 QMT—US submat Edmonds Sea View Tracts D-fict :503.00 Legal BLIP 000 D-05 LOT I OF CITY OF BDM Block 6 Bedroana -4 Bldg SF .2,978 Lotdcre .41 Year Bit -199S Bath F3H : 2 / A Ist V -1,496 Lot SF 17,960 Effralt Stories -2 2ndSF :1,482 Heating: Forced BldgGrad Good Fireplace 2 3rd SP Roof BldgCond Good spa 4th SF View Water&re Public Units I BsmnzyF WWont: Sewer Sewer fi n Fe z O U O 0 w H LL u O z C 1-14-88 5 Is -all FROM.FIRI AMERICAM TITLE EVER Aft ID.42 82932 PACE Yl/ 1i e"Sca n I Snohomish (WA) Owner : Lund Philip O R7512 : 04P. -27N -19 -SW Coowner APN : 4346 000 030 05 04 Site Addr, : 9004191st PI SW Edmonds 98026 Struet : $190,700 Mail Addr : 9004191st PI SW Edmonds Wa 9802d Land : $88,000 Itec Date Deed Total ; $278.700 Price Loan LewyU ; 00217 Aud Fee # Ln Amt 1997 Tax : $3,404.71 771 3908 ActualUse : Leader : Phone .42- - Vest Type : hd2'yp % Owned : BidgName :04E27N48 volume :3 Page:75 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family P.es,Uotsched,l Unit Easteat 2aning :Rs-12000 ZoningRest NbrhdCode :520 CAMNUS SubJPlat : Edmonds Sea View Tracts Da:ct .503.00 Legal : MX 000 D-05 - E 98FT OF S 115" OF Block : 4 Bedrooms : 5 Bldg SF : 3,056 LotAcre : Year Bit :1993 Batt, F3H :2 A ! 1st SF :1,706 Lot SF EffrBlt Stories : 2 2nd SF :1,350 Heating : Forced BldgGrad : Mgh\avg Fireplace : 2 Ad SF Roof . BldgCond : Good Spa 4th SF Mew : Waterft : Public Units : 1 BsmntSF Wtl ront: Sewer : Seaver Owner : Skeels Diane N/Douglas A RTSQ : 04E 27N -18 -NE CoOwner : APN :1827 041057 00 05 Site Addr : 18502 82nd Ave W Edmonds 98026 Struct : $174,200 Mail Addr :18502 82nd Ave W Edmonds W a 98026 Land : $74,000 Rec Date : 01/29/07 Deed : Wananty Total : $249,200 Mee : $301,000 Full Loan : Conventional LevyCd : 00217 Aud Fee # : 40 Ln Amt : $214,600 1997 Tax : $3,032.11 ActualUse : Lender : WaahingtonMutua Phone Kest Type : Married Persons Int2yp : Raced % Owned : 100 Bldg Name :04E27N18 Yolume Page: ,Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Farruly Res,Detached.1 Unit Easmnt Boning : Rs-12000 ZoningRest NbrhdCade :520 90M Sub/Plat Tract .503.00 Legal : ALL TH PTN N1/2 NW Il4 SW IA NE114 Block Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 2,424 LoMcre :.39 Year Bit : 1993 Bath F3H :2 A ! Ist SF :1,486 Lot SF :16,988 EffYrBIt Stories : 2 2nd SF : 938 Heating: Forced B1dgGrad : Good Fireplace : 2 3rd SP Roof BldgCond : Good Spa 41h SF View Warer&e : Publie Units : 1 BsmntSF WtFront : Sewer : Sower u. O if r i i} `.itr"i..=*k.. ¢P AS'x,3isrr=, ,��d'Js. r t4 jet r2'i. i<�e g'u�4Fz',.r'i`irt h t. ,.:f..:aw<=......,..-.. ?.xa.w#"�e«t4+.+.�JtW'4LaivL2zSK,=`..,,.wt. ,.v-.k�.�t�,J;crSuM1'�k �=. iu�,s.,ais's£re"�w (AN-14-99 10-01 FROM.FIRECHERICAN TITLE EVER .1D.42 2932 PACE 12i MesmScaxISnphoinisli (WA) owner : X mtz Thomas G/Jerry RTSQ :,04E -27N -18 NW CbOwner APN : 7762 000 007 00, 06 site Addr . : i822185th Pi W Edmonds 98026 Sftct : $291,300 Matl Addr :18221851h Pi W P.droonds Wa 98026 Land : $105.000 Rec Date : 06/04/91 Deed :Warranty Total : $396,300 Price : $125.000 Full Goan : LewjU : 00217 Aud Fea # : 7 Ln Amt : 1997 Tax a $4.541.36 ActualUse Lender : Phone :425-771-5104 Vest Type Int7,yp % Owned :100 .Bldg Name :04E27N1S Yohnne :49 Page.219 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Uetaohed, l Unit Basntnt Zoning : Rs-12000 2'oningnest : NbrhdCade :520 QUM SublPlat : Panorama Point 7hwt : 503.00 Legal • BLK 000 D-00 LOT 7 Block : I Bedrooms :3 Bldg SF :4,717 LoMcre :31 Bath FSH : 2 i A 1 st SF : 2,411 Lot SF :13,504 Stories : 1 2nd SF Heating : Forced Fireplace 3rd SF Raaf Spa 41h SF View Units :1 BsmntSF : 2,306 WL%nt : Owner : Egler Jeffrey A/Janet E a0mer Site Addr ; 18301 851h P1 W Edmonds 98026 Mail Addr : 4610 217tb St SW Mountlake Terrace W a 99043 Rev Date : 09/17/91 Deed : Warranty Price : $160,000 Full Loan : Conventional Aud Fee # : 317 Ln Amt : $100,000 .lctualUre : Lender : Washinpa. Fed Yest type lnt7yp Bldg Name : 04E27N18 Land Use :11101 Ras,Sg1 Family Res,Detached,l Unit Toning : P.242000 NbrhdCode :520 SublPlat ; Panomma Point Legal : BLK 000 D-00 LOT 5 =s Year Bit :1992 �QYrBIt Bldg6rad ; Vy Good. BldgCond a Good Waterft : Public Sewer :Sewer] R7SQ - 04E -27N -18 NW APN : 7762 000 005 00 08 Struct : $310,800 Land : $135.000 Total . $445,800 LovyCd :00217 1997 Tax : $5.446.07 Phone :206-771-2396 % owned :100 Yolume : 49 Page- 219 Easmnt Zoning@est fidr-A—SM9 Dart :503.00 Block ; 1 j j : 9 1 Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 4,104 LotAcre :.29 Year Bit : 1995 Bath F3H : 3 1 A 1st SF : 2,26T Lot SF : 12.197 FQYrBIt Stories : 2 2nd SF. : 1,937 Heating : Forced BldgGrad : Vy Goad Fireplace : i 3rd SF Roof . BidgCond : Good Spa 4th SF View WaterSre : Public Units :1 BsmntSF - WtFront: Sewer : Sewer :., E , AH-14-88 10.02 FROM.FIRsk"ERICAN TITLE EVER IDr42&2B32, PACE 13o, mdlro►icm I Skohonsish (WA) Owner : Olsen David Wargaret A RTSQ : 04E -27N -19 NW CoOwmer : APN .7762000012 00 09 Site Addr :18306 85th PI W Edmonds 99026 Struct s $267,300 Mail Addr :18306 85th Pl W FAmonds Wa 98026 Land : $115,000 Rea Fate :1A123191 Feed :'S wrantY total :$382,300 Price : $410,000 Full Loan : Conventional LcvyCd : 00217 Aud Fee # : 338 Ln Atnt : $300,000 1997 Tax c $4,670.33 ActualUse : tender : WashingtonM=a Phone Vest Type lnt7yp % Owned 100 BUg Name : 04F27N18 Volume : 49 Page: 219 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached,i Unit .Easrnmt .Zoning : Rs-12000 ZoningBest NbrhdCode :520 CAM= SuWlat :PanormaPoint Tract :503.00 Legal : BLK 000 D-00 LOT 12 Block Bedrooms :4 Bldg SF :3,379 LotAcre :.27 YearBlt :1991 Bath F3H :2 / A Ist SF : 1,889 Lot SF :11,761 rBlt myorisr 2nd SF :1,490 Heating : Forced Bldgarad : Vy Good Fireplace .2 : 2 3rd SF Roof BldgCond : Good Spa 4th SF View WaterSrc : Public Units :1 BsmntSF WtFront: Sewer :Sewer Owner : Stutz harry/Jean D caOwner Site Addr :18310 85th Pi W Edmonds 99026 Mail Addr :18310 85th P1 W Edmonds Wa 98026 Rea Fate : 07/21/95 Feed : Warranty Price : $520,000 Full Loan . Aud Fee # : 437 Ln Amt : ActualUse : Lender : Vest Type : Married Persons lntTyp : BldgNamo .04E27N18 Land Use : 11 of Ras,Scl Family Res,Detached, l Unit Zoning : Rs-12000 NbrhdCode : S20 SublPlat : Panorama Point Legal : BLit 000 D-00 LOT 13 Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 4,144 Bath F3H : 3 / Jl Ist,SF : 2.338 Stories : 2 2nd SF :1,806 Fireplace : 3 3rd SF Spa 41h SF Units : t RSM"ISF RTSQ :04E -27N -18 NW APId : 7762 000 013 00 08 Stmd : $338,500 Land : $105,000 rated : $443,500 Le*CJ :00217 1997 Tax : $5,417.97 Phone % Owned : 100 Volume :49 Page.219 Easmnt 2'oningRest Census Tian% :503.00 Black :1 Latrtcre :.27 Year Dit : 1994 tot SF :11,761 FJWBlt Heating : Heat Pump Blrlg&ad : VY Good Roof : BldgCond : Good View Water&c : Public WtFr ont : Sewer : Sewer z I- W W; O F! 2 �! I ®i Q f- LU = ta: �z U M 0 z H AN-14-99 10.02 FRDM.FIR&AMERICAN TITLE EVER ID,42 2932 PACE 14., MdroSoan l Snohomish (WA) • 04E 27N -18 •NW Owner : SteanMitehell/Gail maw APN - : 7762 000 004 00 09 L'oOwner Site Addr :18311 85th P1 W Edmonds 99026 Struct : $271,200 Mail Addr : 19223 55th Ave NE Seattle We 98155 Land : $135,000 $-M,200 Rec Date : 06110/91 Deed : Warranty Loan : Seller Total LetyCd : : 00217 Price Fee # : $150,000 Full : 667 La Arai : $37,500 1997 Tax : $4,96230 ,4ud ActualUse Lender : Seller Phone : 206-365-5125 Vest Type InrTj'P = % Owned Volume :100 :49 Page.219 BldgNanne Land Use :04E27Ni8 : 11101 Res,Sgl Family RrADetached,l Unit tasmnt Zoning : Rs-12000 Zon{ngRest CAM NbraCode :520 p} :503.00 SublPlat ; Panotatma Point Block:1 Lcgal : BI K 000 D-00 LOT 4 Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3,639 LotAcr a :.27 Lot SF :11,761 YwBit Bit W . 1994 Bath F3H : 3 t 11 1st SF :1.866 2nd SF : 850 Heating : Forced Bi garnd vy Good Stories : 2 3rd SF : Good replace : I dth SF View iWatersre : Public spa Units : 1 BsmnrSF : 922 : WYFmnt : Sewer : Sewer : Merrick Scott W/Holly B RT50 APN : 04E -27N 48 -NW :1762 000 014 00 07 Cvowner Sire Addr :18320 85th P1 W Edmonds 98026 Struct : $242,500 $115,000 Mail Addr : 18320 85th P1 W Edmonds Wa 08026 Land Total : : 5357,500 RecDate :10/26/92 : $348,500 Full Deed : War mnty Loan : Conventional LevyCd : 00217 Price Aud Fee # : 652 Ln Amt : $255,000 1997 lax Lender : Coast Exch MIS Sv Phone 367.36 : -77 : 42525 778-8782 AclualUse Pest Type : . Married Persons lnt7yP : Adjustable % owned Volume :100 Pa :49 8 a: 219 Bldg Name Land Use :04E27N18 : 11101 Res,S91 Funfly Res,Demcl>ed,l tynit Zoning : Rs-12080 ZonEasintgRast onin nc NbrhdCode :520 Tract 503.00 SublPlat : Panorama Paint Block :1 Legal : BLX 000 D-00 LOT 14 Bedrooms Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SP : 3.055 LaMere :.28 Year Lot SF :12,197 Fo Blt :1990 Bath : 2 / t 1 Jst SF :1,648 2nd SF : 1,407 Heating : Forced BldgGrad : Vy Goad Stories -.2 3rd SF Roof BldgCond : Good Fireplace -2 4th SF View Waterft : Public Spa BsmntSF WtFront : Sewer : Sewer Units :1 10-03 FROM. PIR AMERICAN 'CI7LS EVER ID+42 82832 PAGE ! Si MCWOSCan 1 S 018010tsX (WA) Owner : Ballard Darren Mid al/Marilyn Key R25Q : 04B 27N ' -18 -NW c0owner APN : 7762 000 015 00 06 Stte Addr :19330 85th P1 W Edmonds 98026 Strait . : $271,700 Mail Addr :18330 851h PI W 8dinonda WA 98026 Land : $105.000 Rev Date * 11/19/96 Deed : Warranty Total : $376,700 Price : $345,000 Loan : Conventional Le►yCd : 00217 Aud Fee # : 574 Ln Amt : $276,000 1947 Tax : $4,601.92 AcmalUse : Lander : Bank ofArmarica Phone Pest Type : Mantled Persons Int?yp : Agjusasble % Owned :100 Bldg Name : 04B27NI8 Pohane : 49 Page: 219 Land Use :11101 Res,S$I Family Res6De%dwd,1 Unit Basm a Zoning : Rs-12000 ZoningRest : NbrhdCode :520 SubMat : Panorama Point Tract : S03.00 Legal : BLK 000 D-00 LOT is Block : I Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3,431 LoUcre :.27 Year Bit :1990 Bath F3H : 2 I A 1st SF : 1,569 Lot SF :11,761 jWWD1t Stories : 2 2nd SP :1.862 Heaft : Forced BidgGrad : Vy Good Fireplace : 2 3rd SF Roof Bidgcond : Good Spa 41h SF now Water$rc : Public Units :1 BsmntSF Wwront : Sewer : Sewer Owner : Stapleton William lohn/Veronica Freeman R25Q : 04B -27N -18 NW coOwner APN : 8389 000 006 00 08 SiteAddr : 18603 85th PI W Edmonds 98026 Struct : $198,500 Matt Addr : 19603 85th PI W Edmonds Wa 98026 Land : $90,000 ReeDate . 09/29/05 Deed : Warranty TOW : $288,500 Price : $349,0W FUU Loan : Assumption LevyGd : 00217 Aud Fee # : 110 let Amt : $296,000 1997 Tax : $3,524.43 ActualUse : Lender : Washington Fed Sv Phone Pest type : Married Persons IntTyp : Fixed % Owned :100 BIdgNRame : 64F.27N18 yatutne :59 Page- 177 Land Use : I tiol Res,Sg1Family Res,Detaohed,l Unit Baxmni Zoning : its-12000 ZoningRest NbAdOode :520 consus Sub/Plat : Helleren Lane ThW1 : 503.00 Legal : BLK 000 D-00 LOT 6 TOW AN EQ 8t UND Block : 1 Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3.132 LorAcre :.27 YearBlt :1995 Bath FW : 2 / A 1st SF :1,620 Lot SF :11,761 F,#WBlt Stories :2 2nd SF :1,512 Heating : Forced Bldgarad : Good. Fireplace : 2 3rdSF Roof , BidgCond : Good Spa 4th SF Kew WaterSre : Public Units : 1 AsmntSF WtFront: Sewer : Server ,.w^'u+*4....a.'z�s'txb+�d�.w5ofy.�•ti+2e�siS�Srditiss9�*r"Ea:�:�ti('SYat??'..��ti:.'v�3i1�C�3'..?'R+4.u`�.F�st�iiiv�.!Y�'s'Lii.'13:�'�t�Y��Ack4.e#�d�.:..4M�,���—'�'.kf:},ns {".�.. _i )����iv AN-14-98 I0.03 PROM, FIRSOAMERICAN TITLE EVER ID+42 2832 PAGE IS., MetroSeav I Shohontish (WA) Owner : Sand Alban & Nortas RTSQ : 04E -27N AS -NW CoOwnar AM : 4168 000 417 03 04 Site Addr :19106 880A Ave W Edmonds 98026 S&W1 : $198,800 Mail Addr :18106 88th Ave W Edmonds Wa 98026 Land : $14S,000 Rec Date Deed Total : $343,800 Price Loan Levee : 002 17 dud Fee # : Ln Arm 1997 Tax : $4,200.00 ActualUse : lender Phone Vast 7jpe I»t7yp U Owned Volume -16 Page.90 Bldg Mama :04E27N18 land Use :11101 Ree,Sgl Family Res,Detscbed, l Unit Easmnt . Zaning : Rs-12000 gonivRest NbrhdCode :S20 Tract : 503.00 SublPlat Legal : Dobson Path : BLK 000 D-03 LOT 3 OF CLT Y OF EDM Block i 6 Bedroornr : 3 Bldg SF : 4,693 LaUcre :.33 Year Bit :1994 Bath F311 : 2 ! ! 1st SF : 2,374 Lot SF :14,375 BffrBtt Stories : l 2nd SF Heating : Faked BldgGrad : Good F%pzace :1 3rd SF Roof View B1dgCond WaterSre : Good : Public Spa Units 4th SF : 1 Bsmn1&P : 2.319 WtFront : Sewer . Sewer ? F ' Owner : Lee Walter RTSQ : 04E -27N -18 -NW p Co0lvner APR : 4188 000 015 00 09 LU LU( Site Addr : 19206 88th Ave W Edmonds 98026 Struct : $308,700 Mait Addr : 18206 88th Ave W Edmwds Wa 98026 Land : $235,000 v N Bee Date : 04/00/89 Deed : Warranty Total : $543,700 o Price : $340,000 Loan : LoyCd : 00217 w uJ Aud Fee 0 Ln Amt : 1997 Tax Phase : $6,642.06 ActualUse : lender : Intijp : % Owned : Vest Type Bldg Name :04E27N18 Volume :16 Page:00 LUjfnLand Use :11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached,l Unit Basmnt a- Zoning : Rs-12000ce Rest Zonis eat Zoning : NbrhdCode SublPtat : 520 : Dobson Park vast S : 503.00 Legal : BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 15 EXC S 115F r Block Block : 6 Bedrooms .3 Bldg SF : 5,762 Lotdcre : Year Bit : 1992 BathF3H :4 / l 1st SF :3,026 2nd SF Lot SF : Effrait Nearing : Beat PunV B1dgGrad : Good Stories Fireplace :1 -3 3rd SF Roof Di gCond Good �~ Spa 4th SF View Water$rc : Public 1 Units :1 BsmntsF :1,836 WtFrcnt: Sewer :Sewer 6a c AN-14-88 10.03 FROM.FIR AMSRICAN TITLE EVER ID-421982832 MdmScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Miller Eric.li & Kathleen ma : 041E -27N -18 -NW CoOmer APN : 1827 042 03100 04 Site Addr :18300 88th Ave W Edmonds 98026 Slhuct : $294,800 Mail Addr :18300 88th Ave W Edmonds'Wa 98026 lard : $97,500 Rec Date Deed Total : $392,300 Price Loan LevyCd :00217 Aud Fee # Ln Amt : 1997 Tex : $4,256.19 ActuolUse Lender Phone :425470-WSR Vest Type IntTyp 96 Owned Bldg Nance :04E27N18 volume Page: i Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family RMDetnchgAl Unit Easmnt E Zoning : Rs-12000 24ningRest ' NbrhdCode :520 Sl Wlat Tad : 503.00 i 37i I Legal : RT 17-1 IA} FM WV T LOT 1 DAF BEG Block : 6 Bedrooms : 5 Bldg SF : 6,825 LoMcre :.26 Bath F3H : 3 /2 A lst SF : 2,273 Lot SF :11,326 Stories : 2 2nd SF : 2,441 Heating : Forced Fireplace -.3 3rd SP hoof : Spa 41h SF View . Units : L BsmndV :2,111 wsl%nt: owner : Cady Bruce W/Wendy L Coowner Site Addr : 19916 88th Ave W Edmonds 98026 Mail Addr :18916 88th Ave W Edtuands Wa 98026 RecDate :11/25/92 Deed : Warranty Price : $345,000 Full Loan : Convmtionst Aud Fee # : 550 Ln Amt : $276,000 ActualUse : Lender : NorwestMtg vest 2jpe : Married Persons IniTyp : Adjustable Bldg Name : 04E271V18 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl family Res,Detaehod,l Unit Zoning : Rs-12000 MrhdCode :520 Sub/P14t : Didarca Fststes Legal : RLK 000 D-00 LOT 5 Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 3,017 Bath F311 :2 /1 / 1st SF :1,662 Stories :2 2ndSF :1,355 Fireplace : 2 3rd SF Spa 4th SF Units :1 BsmntSF FACE Year Bit : 1991 EfjYrBit BldgGrad : Vy Hood BidgCond : Goad WaterSre : Public Sewer : Sewer R7SQ :04B -27N -18 -SW APN : 7286 000 005 00 05 Struct : S246,900 Land : $113,000 Total : $359,900 LovyCd :00217 1997 Tax : S4,396.68 Phone % Owned, :100 volume :45 Page.38 Easmint ZoningRest Census Tract .503.00 Block :4 LaMere : YearBlt :1992 Lot SF : FjYralt .Healing : Forced BldgGrad : Vy Good Roof BldgCond : Good View Wxeirsm : Public WtFront: Sewer : Sewer t r• , !AN-14-88 1e.04 PROM.FIREGRAMERICAN TITLE EVER ID.42&e2832 Meta,rr,Seart /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Eldar Chutes Ratnsey/Melanie Kaye RTSQ : 049 -27N -1.8 -SW CoOwner : APN : 7296 000 006 00 04 Site Addr :18920 88th Ave W Edroontls 98026 Struct : $173,800 .Mail Addr : 18920 88th Ave W Edmonds WA 98026 Land : $90,000 Bee Dare : 05/14/92 Deed : Wuranty 7001 : $265,800 Price : $315,S00 Full Loan : Conventional kevyCd : 00217 Aud Fee # : 630 Ln Amt : $252AM 1997 Tax : $3,247.12 Aetualbse : Leader : Ctx Mtg Phone : 425.774-1072 Pest Type : Married Persons dnt7yp ; Fixed % Owned :100 y 3 2 PAGE Me i Bldg Name : 04E27N18 Vah ane : 45 Page: 38 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sg1 Family Res,Detacbed,i Unit Easmnt �i Zoning : Re-12000 2oningKest Ot NbrhdCode :520 cenm Ui SublPlat : Hidarca Estates Tract .503.00 o+ W: regal : ELK 000 D--00 LOT 6 Block : 4 �- Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 2.698 ioMere : Year B11 :1991. LL 0 Bath F3H : 2 / 11 1st SF : 1,540 Lot SF : E°YrOlt ' Stories : 2 znd SF : 1,148 Hearing : Forced BldgGrad : Good J fireplace : 2 3rd SF Roof B1dgCond : Good Spa 4th SP View Waterft : Public n Units :1 BsmntSF WtFront : Sewer : Sewer Owner ; Zaebaria Marls A/Aml L RnQ : 04B -27N -1$ NW c0oweer APN : 4346 000 002 00 03 Site Addr : 8525 Oyaapic View Dr Edmonds 99026 Struct : $108.000 Mail Addy : 8325 Olympic View Dr Edmonds Wa 98026 Land : $62,000 Rec Date : 06103/97 Deed : Warranty Total : $170,000 .Price : $265,000 Full Loan : Conventional LevyCd : 00217 Aud Fee # : 73 Ln Amt : $190,000 1997 Tax : $2,076.79 ActualUse : Lender : North American M Phone Vest Type : Married Persons fnt7.Yp : Fixed % Owned : 100 Bldg Name :04E271418 Volume :3 Page;75 Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,DeWWd,l Unit Eunint Zoning : Rs-12000 2'oningResr NbrhdCode :520 census SublPlat : Edmonds Sea View Tracts Tract .502.00 Legal : ELK 000 D-00 - TH PTN LOT 2 LY NLY Block : 5 4 k Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 1.656 LotAcre : Year Bit :1990 Bath F3H :2 i /1 1st SF :1,102 Lot SF WrBlt Stories : 1.5 2nd SF : 554 Hearing : Elm Wall BldgGrad : HigMavg . Ftt+eplace :1 3rd SF Roof BidgCond : Good Spa 41h SF View Waterft : Public Units : 1 Bsmn1SF WIRront : Sewer : Sewer W U O a ur v 0 z ❑r RN-14-99 i®.04 FROM•FIR ' AMERICAN TITLE EVER I0.4292932 MatroSca►a/Snohointsh (WA) Omer : Armour Anita R?SQ : 043 .27N -19 NW CaOwner : APN :1827 042 006 00 05 Site Addr : 9106 Olympic View Dr Fie loads 98026 Struct : $110.400 Matt Addr : 9106 Olympic View Dr Edmonds Wa 98026 band : 3106,500 Ree Date : 10/00/99 Deed : Warranty Total : $216,900 Price Aud Fee # : $76,5W LnAmt �: 1Tax 00217 : $2,649.74 ActualUse Lander Phone :425-778.3726 Vert Type lnt7,�p % Owned Volume Page Bldg Name :04E27N18 Land Use :11101 Res,Sgl FamilyRes,Datached,l Unit Basmnt Zoning : Rs-12000 ZoningRest NbrhdCode :520 tract :503.9i} SublPlar Legal : RT 17E-2A .& 17D•IA) BEG AT SW COR Bloc ; 6 PAGE We Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF :1,824 LorAcry :.47 Year Bit :1991 Bath F3H : 2 1 / IstSF :1,104 Lot SF : 20,473 Heating : Forced JOWBIr BldgOrad :Highlavg Stories : 2 2nd SF .720 3rd SF Roof BldgCond : Good Fireplace 41h SF View Watersrc : Public spa Units : 1 BsmntSF WtFront : Sewer : Sewer Owner : Daeley Jon M/Maurinc D CaOwner Site Addr : 9122 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds 99026 Mail Addr :1218 203rd PI SW Lynnwood Ws 98036 Ree Date : 12/16/93 Deed Wit` Price : $85,000 Full Loan : Seller And Fee # : 603 Ln Amt : $65,000 ActualUse : Lender : Scher Vest type : Married Persons lnt2yp : Fixed Bldg Name : 04E27N18 Land Use : 11101 Rem,S91 Family R 01.06=11 1 Unit Zoning : Rr,12000 NbrhdCode :520 Sub/Plat Legal : LOT I OF CITY OF ED SP 5-7-90 REC Bedrooms : 4 Bldg SF : 3.030 Bath F3H :2 / A pst SF : 1,308 Stories ; 2 2nrl SF :1,722 Fireplace : 2 3rd SP Spa 41h SF Units : i BsmntSF R7SQ : o4E .27N -18 -NW APN :1527 042 038 00 07 Struct : $168,700 Land : $80,000 Total : $248,700 LevyCd :00217 1997 Tax : $3,038.22 Phone % Owned :100 Volume Page: Easmnt Zontn^t cow Tract :503.00 Block :6 LotAcre :.37 Year Bit :1994 Lot SF :16.117 EfiBlt Heating : Forced BldgGrad : HIgMavb Roof BldgCond : Good View WaterSrc : Public WtBront : Sewer : Sewer AN-14-98 10:04 FRDM.FYR AMERYCAN TITLE EVER ID.4262932 FACE 20i llMeirtASmn I SNOhojoish (W.4) Owner : Fougsti Linda:Sinthusan Antipat RTSQ : 04E -27N . 49 -SW CoOwner : APN : 5131000145 21 02 McAddr : 17512 Olympic View Dr Edmonds 98026 Stma . : $139AN, Mall Addr :175I2 Olympic View Dr F,dmou& Wa 98026 Lard : $60,000 Rec Date : 05/1S/92 Dead : Wauranty Tatal : $199,400 Price : $196,750Full Loan : Conventional le►yCd : 00217 dud Nee # : 632 Split In Amt : $140,000 ' 1997 Tax : $2.435.95 AetualUse : Lender : Continental Svgs P.hona vest lype : Married Parsons lntT p : Fixed 96 Owned :100 z Bldg Name : 04=1408 volutes : S Page: 38 ¢ M Land Use Zoning : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached,l Unit Basnttat . : its-12000 %ee Rost Cr 21 NbrhdCode : 520 a SublPlat : Maadowdale Beach 2tract : 503.00 a 01 c.t e' Legal : BLK 000 D-21 LOT 2 OF C1TY' OF EDM Block . 6 LU M, Bedrooms : 3 Bldg SF : 3.018 LoMere : Year Bit : 1992 -j I.- BathFSH :3 1,818 LtS: BF Uj o1 Stories 1 2nd SF Heattng : Forced ,YrBltCn B1dgGrad : Avg 2 Fireplace 3r,d SF Roof BldgCond : Good U Spa : Yes 414 SF view Wataft : Public < N Units : 1 Bsmn1SF :1,200 W ront : Sewer : Sewer me La M x z t-(; Owner : Linton Robat RTSQ : 048 -27N -07 -SW t- OE ¢"; 'L'oO APN . 5444 000 036 02 04 z w w, 81teAddr Mail Addr :17748 Talbot Rd Eduaonds 98026 1780 Strict : albot Rd Edmonds Wa 98026 : $340,000 a O Rec Bate : 09J00/88 Warranty tal : $357,600 — Price : $250,000 Loan : ZmyCd : 00217 o s Aud Fes # AcholUse Lae Amt 1997 Tax : $4,368.58 Lender Phone LL O Vest Type % Owned — Bldg Name : 04E27N07 Volume .12 Page:107 Uwe Land Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Dctaehe nit Basmnt F 0 Zoning NbrhdCode : Rs-20000 :520 ZoningRest : 0 Sub/Plat : Talbot Park ?race : S02.00 ti Legal : BLK 000 D-02 - Sl/2 TR 36 LESS Block : 5 Bedrooms .2 Bldg SF : S40 ere : Year Bit :1993 BathF3H :1 l 11 1st SF :540 Lot FtgYrBlt Stories Fireplace : 1 : 1 2nd SF 3rd SF Heating : Heat Pump MOW : Good Roof B140W : Good �..: Spa 4th SF view : Water&c : Public Units ; 1 BsmntSF WtFront : Sewer :Sewer F- Z a- ip W W ga U ft7 ph 2 V cf. 151- z mow, 82832 PACE AN— 14-88 16.05 FRON.FIR '' ANERICAN TITLE EVER ID.42 ilr�etr awe/Snalacan�sh (WA) R1'SQ :04B .27N -07 -SW der Thuasaa 8 APN : So" 0" 042 04 04' C 0mer Talbot Rd EdMWtdS 98026 : $221,600 SW Addr W4M A&& :17926 :17926.1.*ftt Rd Bdmoada Wad 6 I=d Total : $100,0W : $321,600 Roe Doe : 07/W89 : WamtatY LeY� : =17 - prw Loan - $47'� Ln Ar+et 1997 Taz : $3.928.79 Aud Fee # : Lender : Plana : 20&670-2825 Actualuse Vela Type Ina?jp % O►v+�ed Volume :12 pass, 1QT BMS'Vame . 04827N01 Ytc%S81 F&n%Uy Rsc.D6W114l U1it iiasm t : Yea Land Use :11101 7,onirigRest zon*9 :1t-a0000 NbrhdCode : 520 DC eect : 502.00 . lat :.Talbot Park BLY, 000 D-04 E 127FT DF W 234.98F'1' Bock : 5 Legal : 3 Bldg :3.099 LoUcm : Year'Bit : i990 ak Bedroom Both 173H : it l . 1st SF : i,742 Heating : Foxcxd B1dgCrad : Owd Stories :1 ind SF Roof Vvy BtrlgCond y Good p replace 3rd 5F : 2 =t/Y : W,:Iws're : Nblic Spa 4th SF BsmntSl: :1,357 WtFront : Sewer : Savor limits :1 R, 0 U_ 0 z _g, AN-14-88, Ia-as & PROW.FIRO1D4282832 AMERICAN TITLE EVER PAGE 22. evae statistics Average Sale Price $283,000.00 Average Loan Amount $202,300-00 Number of Sales in last Year 2 Number of sales in last 6 months 0 Note: Average Sale prIca and Zoan AmOunts are calculated on full value sales within the last year. Fara statistics oviner Occupied 32 Absentee Owner Average square Footage 3397 4zz- # bedrooms 3 Average of Average # of Bathrooms2.90 Average Year built 19,92 r t � i .: `- ... .:.»v. ra.;:.:...r,.:: ,..v>sa.cauwi.�a:�y ".„..,wes. ..erxyer �°iSrM'^.SCSB;w;iSixif�G"w.;4Z�5;ii�.'.:JE.�i�krx%YLttl+�3i.,Mai.Y,.,.:.;.:M1:ktA"k2Y.ifi7Nk�9i31713'i5.•i.^,,;4,�!h'+�aei�:.td.Y.ti S:.'YYLrt7. "w.' .,i..::, .,.. ♦ A 1y /f.'.jp1j♦ I. INTRODUCTION (a) Clarify record Aq `" �- p (b) Thank staff - j'�' < (c) Address Hearing Examiner9 II Outline: ()P&V-,iyL 97*r Tf/I EN?` 01 1. Go through the staff report and only discuss those items that CJ Cn o �af we disagree with and thos�Mems that may endorse our proposed LULUi X' 11e j�bl development. - 3 w.7+ r.&cr't-c ao F,ew Soo 't sd vtS reoe.. 4C%Q_ cn UJ /'�C 61 >J I-C M We will be submitting a few exhibits as evidence. UJ N r fo 1' I will be comparing our proposal with recent developments Then a short conclusion. U. dl C tY s We want to reasonably use our property which is located above �. o' the top of slope. We propose to show that a 15 foot setback is w uai arbitrary and unsubstantiated and we show how the proposed development is a reasonable use of the property. LU W A. Application s cs B. Recommendations LU CD a The staff suggests approval the request to eliminate the 50-foot Z critical area buffer but maintain the 15 foot building setback from a critical area requirement. r Ist. 20.15B.080 Developments standard - General B. Buffers 1. General. The city shall have the authority to �- require buffers on critical areas dependent upon the sensitivity of the critical areas the degree of anticipated impact, and the proposed land use adjacent to the critical area. 0 Since the staff is willing to eliminate the 50-foot critical area buffer it may be assumed that the city, represented by the staff, must believe the amount of the sensitivity of the critical area must be very low or no sensitivity at all as concluded in the geotechincal engineer's report. Also the degree of the anticipated impact must be near zero and the proposed land use next to the critical area must not be of concern to the city or they would have required some kind of the buffer. s 20.15B.080 Developments standard - General C. Building Setback Lines. A building setback line of 15 feet is required from the edge of any buffer to prevent construction intrusions into the buffer. No other setback requirement can be found in the Chapter 20.15B 01 "Critical Areas" It seems reasonable to assume if there is no buffer needed then there is no reason, that the staff can suggest, that a set back is required. To impose a building setback is arbitrary since it is not a part of the ® Edmonds community development code F. Conclusions for the variance criteria: (b) "The building footprint proposed by the applicant is very substantial." 3 , O "very substantial" is relative and subjective. The staff does not offer any comparison to anything in order for a z judgment to be made as to the size of the proposal as it relates to ¢ wh at? s LUf L4U Section G. Item (d) the staff has down grader their "very substantial" oi to "fairly large" (Shrug) Cn W( U) LLi Here are only 3 comparisons that could have been made: LU 1. So is this proposed 2100 square foot floor plan and 900 square i d foot garage" "very substantial" or "fairly large" compared to other houses in the area? x z�: z Qi I would like to submit as an exhibit- a detailed list from the county LU M,, records of all the houses built within approximately one mile of the proposed development in the last seven years. o The average square footage for all of these houses built in last seven years is approximately 3400 square feet with most of them with 3 ►- F- car garages. _ z• LU F 2. Is this proposed "2,100 square foot floor plan and 900 square foot z garage" "very substantial" or "fairly large" compared to other houses granted reasonable use exceptions? Of all the variances provided to me by the planning department, the average square footage was approximately 3,900 sq. ft. 3 c ay 0 ^,1 3. Is this proposed "2100 square foot floor plan and 900 square foot garage" "very substantial" or "fairly large" compared to the available ® building area before the top of the slope and property line setbacks? According to the staff report the slope F. (a) "virtually splits the site in half" 17,952 sq. ft lot /2 = 8,976 sq. ft less approximately 2,600 sq. €t of building set backs leaves approximately 6,300 sq. ft of building area. The proposed development would cover approximately 47% of the allowable building area, 33% of the area above or before the slope and only 16% of the entire lot where the RS-12 code allows up 35% lot coverage. -s : • <: G. Conclusions for the Reasonable Use criteria: � a; z F-;: z o- (a) The staff report suggest "there may be design alternatives LU Lui that would minimize the critical area buffer intrusion". Staff has �E indicated that a buffer is not necessary at all. _ Uj There may be design alternatives but this is our design that we are o proposing. 1. The angle of the house is necessary to capture the view as you can see in the short plat attachment, the neighbor to the north z~ has enjoyed for many years. Chapter 16.10 of ECDC - RESIDENTIAL ZONES - PURPOSES B. Any growth or development should strive to preserve for itself and its neighbors the following values: 1. Light (including direct sunlight) 2. Privacy r—"" 3. Views, open spaces, shorelines and other natural features 4. Freedom from air, water, noise and visual © pollution; I` YA So view is important according to this chapter in the ECDC. It is important to the neighbors, thus the angle of their homes. A¢ 4 sa Yle-- G00-1 rlcz... 2e mat ' a'� sP ` "�) �t �. J, y4,,a s, y • I would like to submit as an exhibit a map of two of the most recentH reasonable use exception proposal that were approved in 199 t. t,-,( jdec J e- 5e. ,,er ed W LL 0 U 0 a UJ U 8 Z E! 0 1. Both of these homes are larger than our proposal: 2. Oriented to the view 3. Both intrude into the critical area even though it appears a different design could achieve a building similar in size and not intrude into the critical area. 4. In both cases the staff did not request a Modified. Approval nor did they suggest a different design to minimize any intrusion into the buffer or the critical area itself. 5. Both these proposal were granted what they had proposed which was elimination of the 15 foot setback and elimination of the 50 foot buffer. These people have been granted the privilege to enjoy the use of their property in the manner they had, proposed. (d) The "fairly large" issue has already been discussed and, appears to be irrelevant. Last sentence: "Different floor plan layouts may achieve a building similar in size but could minimize any critical area intrusion." It appears the staff wants to reduce our use of the property for no other reason than size, shape, angle and/or location of the house on the property. If a 15 foot setback was imposed along the entire slope that would essentially reduce our lot by nearly 2600 square feet. If we go to the early calculation of the area before the slope use 1/2 of lot = 8,976 sq. ft and take away 2600 sq. ft we have a lot size of approximately 6300 sq. ft. 17.40.30 ECDC States that any existing lot in a RS-12 zone must a minimum 8400 sq. ft to be a legal lot. i t ...._ .v.u...._.,,.......,.,,..„...,r. wuw`.L+wwvriurw..r.uw_ ... ........�......w.wwwm.r.«ru.c.�unwv..warr+.wu...wr........ <._—_.._... ... t �......_13...r.........+w..+.n+.rw.. • O S r / 1 �.X City wants to impose a set back requirement that is not allowed by the ECDC. a If one argues the intent of the Critical Area Ordinance in this instance is to setback from the critical area, it is not evident in the approvals w of the last three variancesheasonable use exception. U01 M gut. Conclusion: J Mi W U. The State of Washington has enacted a law, adopted by the City of � Edmonds, that says in essence - we cannot build on this 40% slope, N we cannot use our property as we would like. So we have this _ U artificial barrier... z I-`', It is ironic that my own home, built just six years ago, located a z Q short distance from this site, is built on a lot that is entirely a 44% UJ M slope... (J T. So the state has taken away our rights to use 112 of our property a D and the city wants to take away an additional 15 feet no reason that _ can be substantiated. W (� x The shape of the lot, the access point, building setbacks, the critical LU area and the orientation of the home to capture the view forces us to locate the home as proposed. We wanted to locate the corner of the garage over a short distance over the slope but we were advised by the planning department that would be harder to get approved. So we made the adjustment to accommodate the staff's recommendation. ,a..-. = Building up to the slope will not hurt the neighbors. Building up to the slope will not hurt the slope. ®� Building up to the slope will not adversely impact anyone or anything. Other home owners in the area and in other critical slope areas have be granted the right to use and enjoy their property. all All we want is to reasonably use what is left of our property. Thank you. p� 1 x'E-§s �F Jr �x 31 s.1 9 It 4J v s e....S.Fw.r S. ky S 85TH ePL. W. 4�J ,.,, va '.. •".'W _. pTi ttM��' *a t . "ta. 1518 � "6884'• _ 112 1�^ y PL. tee e1e Io 11.71 H659 A AVE. W. e 00 ., i. ,` a '�. .�ms.& .. "� �� Y 1���..k , r �� ... :'.. �......;,1 � _," :. �.,, 2 . 1 � i :'- ". s �. F_...• i S�•.t t hYs�"}'� x�� r vX rs,�}�.s ,rrG,4,s��-� �� ly '' W �r�W ujJ W Gv U. co LLj) 1 d, G1DGY!�— W Wi 4 1 t UJ y` r» LL er •tt00'!' � .IC 2c,�VTE •w 1 � `� tt d060 Rxfi4�,= a torma �tm��esa tll t� W 0 ~ r I �v 66 PDJI r i�� it it�4Kb�' �,� �i \ i' 9, t411{ xx:i.. Usx ti ` i' row avia 1 x le st • a sr M is w rover / w �� t _._ . F } �k 7�jt •�mxlrn y,,,u �jt 4 1 I t Y,��Y is b4r My name is jay Y(-.'Itg I live at 18810-92nd Ave W hdIPEnds. I have been a real estate broker for the last 10 years, most recently for Real Property Associates. I have been asked to give my professional opinion of the value of the houses to be built and quantify the impact a 15' setback from the top of the bank would have on the house to be built on lot 2 (which this hearing addresses) as wellas the house to be built on the neighboring lot 3. LU I have read the staff report and would like to voice my disagreement with cn U. regards to the staffs recommendations based on the their assumption that this 15' building setback from the top of the bank a reasonable and acceptable modification. The 15' setback is not reasonable ndacceptable for two reasons: U. o I. First, if the 15' setback is enacted, the reasonable use that the other z hf` neighboring property owners have enjoyed for many years is being denied z p these applicants. w w; n; I have color coded a plat map of the surrounding developed parcels. All of ca v9 the highlighted parcels have at least one thing in common which is these o houses were built on the slope (in the critical area) or within 15' from the top _ � or bottom of the slope. All would be in violation of the staff's o recomendation. -W-n. a. LU Ca Specifically the houses in the neighboring cul-de-sac were built at the base of the slope. The reason these homes were placed where they were when they z °x were built was to take advantage of a level front yard. If a 15' setback were enacted then, these houses would not be as well positioned and therefore not as desirable. The home which is in green on the map is built within the critical area, in the middle of the slope and are using the level area at the toe of the slope for their yard. On the second page is an exhibit of the three lots where I live 4 blocks away O with similar zoning. All three of the housdwere built on the slope to maximize views and preserve the level area for our yards. These housd were built in the 70's and the owners have been enjoying this highest and best, reasonable use. If you were to apply the staff recommendation to these lots today, I would only be able to build at the bottom of my property- my house. would not have a view nor a usable yard and would be worth substantiIless. II. The second reason for disagreement is the claim of the staff that a 15' setback from the top of the bank will still allow a reasonable use of a building on lot 2. Not True. Cit I ?.. Y Y:"v < 1 ,.. S t t'`��".�s�i��7 xn� L �:. c� l �'1 r .eft c r� rz• t 1F ,+'wr` z} :t � L s s �, Sys t u� r �;s t t.7. t r 17fir + r G Sy,+r fit" 1 1 _.+y h �k 'z`^•wt':i , t '+.�. y> ,t L K4f� � � t, � h'k. ft•. { _ L 'i`T° + ! hF��F 1£ l C Ui1 J �..fir/ �o� +y Gjcaviirll�i u JAN Y Affidavit of Publication EDMONDS CITY CLERK . STATE Or WASHINGTON, j Q COUNTY Or SNOHOMISH, Jr i S+ NOTT1 E:OF HBAR O . 1"• E7tAMINE sUSLUD ik RMEt=F� .. a NO,TtCe OPt,Ogt40 Li ar� e t TT JAi�ptPLIC'OIrt1901" NAF�EtOFiItRBHIC NTt}jJt wetmiw aleaa oc The undersi ned, bein first duly sworn on oath deposes and says ®f tiR,RO,'I T Nt MBERmrag gOBo Cow,. t PaOJEco ICA fin that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper W eRO#fi �°d �1aso lQ ' Ir ° printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snohomish, W cgnsal er u. , l -J h t ""a }Pq° aw t e and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of boa d{idiie&iaqrti41` fill r to tt,. CondlUaq I;Ur1e�P lmlt. Hs w aevalaa�tentpstaot aB general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper monouua estoliraat ottlBnt P ' roUotMtoYtar tmia ! xaaed a , alJcpn zs;• has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Mmllra�d� 617Y CO hM I eeif �a8t�cFtiAg1°�PE(to; Court of Snohomish County and that the notice ........................................ 4 �`ERn1a+ Ui: Public Hearing & Development Application P.R Heoor��yy gTrraMt ^' 7'8 MofSd•`�gVfat+r':._. Q( atlodeo, reg E I,.,b s.,' ......., Western Wireless. Corp ....................................... .CtR1co1 kra; &I tI C "I! ......... 1'-RB8eaana r a uIr nd O 1 he f 'atlo l a 50 degrlfitica gtrq e W W! ,�nta t6e,60daonrritl0a at.su A+ offer for p paloytcal az• Project No.: ADB097 129/CU-97 130 ardOok cdtla :a(aa qq�nc� he ......................................................... alt(qIgallatA o Itla ffit tr0E et• ••••••••• ••.••••• ••••••••••••••.•••.•••••.••.••• b4rlhlralM.1(lerregl/ITpd bYf ar. - ••••• Oc TiPb°b+t"1�lanamRs f a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said Karlaa 'Kiwsmbto { duBLIO;0 �MMEP{T faaf��d'o; newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and W DUE SY t 18188 - - r NAME CP•APP IICA (YT ty q entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: Herb/MlagaaB�644O`r>ry_ M'? PROJECT NUM ER - PRO ECTLt�"C° YiON Ft.i lift tee,oznus`a w December 31, 1997 W.((y Edmon�ti.............................. I.......... ,.......................................... .. ............................... ,'f;.ROJEO7 pEsgefet10Nl;'r V .Variance..to..itncreasa.tls t W arJ6a tarall w ap•addtllon z trap ,m Istatowl,40 ahangq6............................................................................................................................. z -tram-alaY,root ttr et ♦!T2 ��� - Pltahea root ;TP4�aragatt?� fa and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers zoned RB yyAC a MdQQOrd�tair during an of said period. PUBr O COMMgEW PERIODDUE BY: It - PUBCC.HE Ago ATEt ,3an eRMA�tOr9e+B8•: e3 Y4/i.eJ..! +......... .. . . .............................. pp ........ ... I7.00ATION 3` a'" - Principal Clerk -8rd Floor �,/setl Rooroa. ii216tth--Ayes: dmofidi' CltytCl, 31SC EI ',all Dsaampgi 31 816 Subscribed and sworn to before me this ........................... H,F dw0V......... .a... Decembett.... .l..1................ 19.��... 5-2-1 a ® o E 0 1. 1 On mat oaths I certify that the names and !addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of ,the subject prtporty. _ .0e signaturatof Appilawntor AMR&n epraeen vs Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,� day off •., o ary u n an o e e e o as ng on ♦„♦,�Q �ss�osu4+% ko : Residing at d �: .,; -�s rr ;.; r; z:. y A� .,. yY,.. Ag .. Hamad &Barbara Anderson Thomas Berry BrettBnmdage 8324 Olympic View Dr 8432 Olyinpic View Dr 18029 85thPl W ;` Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026 4 cc.�� riy Lillian Christensen George Sherwin Jr. Paul &Sue Cochran N 18117 85th Pi W 18107 85th Pl W 8426 Olympic mew Dr Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 9$026 U) Q Paul & Susan Cochran Julie Stutz 8426 Olympic View Dr 18IO2 BSth Pl W ri0,, Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026 ds; W 8026 �c LU t~u Allen & lane Custer Farrokh Kazemain Charles Hill & Aim Meyer Joy 18122 85th PI W 18110 85th PI "W 181i8 85th P1 W V` _ Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026 Edmonds, WA 98026 m ►- i John Holmer Lawrence & Nancy Hutson Robert Irwin Zt Ly W 18026 85th PI W Edmonds, WA 98026 20251st Ave #700 18119 85th Pl W Seattle, WA 98121 Edmonds, WA 98026 H z Dennis O'Leary Rob Michel } 6632 192nd P1: SW 8022 212th St. SW _a Lynnwood, WA 98036 Edmonds, WA 98026 0. K� 4 :. i � { t .f U"�! its C"1 � � f"Y.. jGt'-f ' It ,..... .. :;.C.-r .r.,�. i `� ✓�.''1it{ r'�_., Ste;' � {4 YY11u /.... l4"'4[�=fr"t f�iZ'� �1��4.... �'� h �k.PiQ'7�T`% ^"#a�i{ �n ✓r5 ��i!t� •!. - �IAf�; P {... /i' e <�.( � c t r Strt sa. '���� kl'♦f�+ita.�5 �, i il}.� S 9i �ra4 s�'" t� .�' n}. SF i.{aa. sd�}.t i„� �� •� i+ "' _r ....f .r.F�t iKs<aE �t%Sr+q�xk`4�'�'.'/teal n c,"ai� �A 'ter-, r�!'LrJ, w'`s;"�'{.{73.,.-r3,.: G �t „��� ��+�a +�"KKK �a1, ��'��: h''�' ,tT . i�.t>;� s � 3 FILE'NO.: V-97-145 z O'Leary: Edmonds a u NOTICE OF HEARING LU AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING — 0 W STATE OF WASHINGTON .) c� z �j, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) WWi. .. - La 1, Karrissa Kawamotto, first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: = W �w — That on the 31 st day of December, 1997, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was Uj posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Civic Center and the a Library. z Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3l day off F Notary Public in and for a tateof-'4'Uashington - ®_; Residing atGsli�, LL E�o VJMI G V1- YYMt7Il11YV 1 MY COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) I; Melinda M. May, first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That on the 31st day of December, 1997, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. Subscribed and sworn to before me this oela day 19? A o c K_ t:af V shfn0 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. $:rtu of Washln�fon DIA BOCK My Appo!n',nan! E>y�trcs N,:y 30.20di Residing at-77 ""�ryr ..afia^`' W '-+ S t'" t'r' %''sir a i5r rFs. ��.k nH'a'r.„"f9.t��spY o «g k tLidir ���H. a..F A > anc.180) CITY OF EDMO DS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Waste water Treatment Plant December 9, 1997 Mr. Dennis O'Leary 6632192nd PI SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 Subject: ASSIGNMENT OF HEARING DATE Dear Mr. O'Leary: Your application is now complete and has been scheduled for a public hearing at the time and place listed below. Action: Reasonable UseVariance File No. Assigned: V-97-145 Date of Hearing: January 15.1998 Time: 9:30 A.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible. Place: Third Floor Meeting Room Edmonds City Hall 121- 5th Avenue N. Hearing Body: Hearing Examiner Please be aware that your presence at the hearing is highly advisable. If an applicant or his representative is not present, the item may be moved to the end of the agenda. Items not reached by the end of the hearing will be continued to the following month's agenda. The property will be posted with a Notice of Land Use Action sign approximately 10-14 days before the meeting. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact meat (425) 771-0220. Sincerely, Commun5ky Services Depart ent - Planning Division Karissa Kawamoto Planner cc: File No. V-97-145 v97.14340M • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International -- Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE "NORTH a EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425)771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant `nC.189" December 3, 1997 Mr. Dennis O'Leary 6632192nd PI SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 Subject: INCOMPLETE APPLICATION FILE NO. V-97-145 Dear Mr. O'Leary The reasonable use variance application for Lot 2of Short Plat No. S-28-79 has been determined to be incomplete. The following items need to be added to the application packet: 1. A Critical Areas Checklist was not on file for this speck lot. Please complete the enclosed application form so we have one for our records. If one has been done in the past, please provide the City a copy. 2. Please clarify whether the corner of the garage is intended to be located within the critical area (beyond the top of slope identified by your geotech engineer). If so, the application or the site plan needs to be amended. To assist in the analysis of your request, an approximate figure on the size of the proposed building footprint, including the garage would be helpful. Please submit this and the above noted information as soon a possible so the application may stay on schedule. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (425) 771-0220. Sincerely, Community Services partment - Planning Division / Karissa'Kawamoto Planner cc: File No. V-97-145 v-97-145.inc T� �= LU a w U J (-3 0 (nW wz J I- Ln o W} a� cc LL c2 0 r Lu. z i— ,� o z� w w U to o� r + —z wCn L_ or z O it -APPLIICATIQN ROUTING FORM FiI:E : W97445 :ALLARID CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING '11- 7 �t � l% fQtj QV ROUTED TO _ : RETURNED P .� �.iii 'W I1j91.tC \NARKS DEPT Engineering 11 / 12/97 Engineering Fire 11 / 12/97 Fire P Public Works Parks et Rec. 1`1112/97 Parks es Rec. Staff Comments: *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner Dennis V. O'Leary 2 Property Address__ g432 Oivmpic View Drive • Date of Application 11 /b/97 • Type Variance for Reasonable Use • Hearing Required: Yes X No Date of Hearing (if known) X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8:5 x 11) X Fee X Site Plam(11 x 17) X APO List Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report Environmental Assessment X Vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) 1 Elevations X Declarations (Variance) Petition (Official Street Map) X Environmentaf Checklist Critical Areas Determination f It LZ z "w U O �o W Lux -ir Lf)o Wr Q� L �2a z t— ,o WW �o �En n— O h W W, = V �p z LUU) U S O ~i z s Q RECEIVED NOV 1 ,3 1997 ROUTED TO: RETURNED EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. En Engineering Fire \ 1 ! � q ']7 Public Works t 1 / 12/97 Public Wor Parks 8t Rec. i i 112/97 Parks sx Rec. k �h 'Staff Comments: PER WHAT SECTION. OF THE CODE?' *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner Dennis V. O'Leary * Property Address 5432 Olympic View Drive Date of Application t t 16/97 • Type Variance for Reasonable Use • Hearing Required: Yes_X No Date of Hearing (if known) X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X Fee X Site Plan (11 x 17) X APO List Legals (Existing & Proposed) s Title Report Environmental Assessment X Vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year Occupancy,(ADU) Elevations X Declarations (Variance) a Petition (Official Street Map) X Environmental Checklist Critical Areas Determination © ® • 4. g 1Y Z �APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE :'V'97-145 AND CHECKLIST FAOW: PLANNING RFICEIVED : NOV 1 31997 ROUTED TO:: RETURNED VA Engineering ING ENGINEER FIr6 1/12/97,% Fir d ..Public Works 11/12/97, Public Works Parks ex Rec. 11/12197 Parks et Rec. Staff Comments: 6�- AyAalez 62L-to IYO/I *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? '9> -4P *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review Owner Dennis V. O'Leary Property Address 8432 Olympic View Drive • Date of Application 11/6/97 • Type Variance for Reasonable Use • Hearing Required: YesX No Date of Hearing (if known) X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11). —X Fee X Site Plan (11 x 17) X APO List —Legals (Existing & Proposed) J Title Report EnvironmentalAissessment X Vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADIJ) Elevations X Declarations (Variance) Petition (Official Street Map) X Environmen I tall Checklist Critical Areas Determination 0 t } t ) �-�+'Si..�P.���"�t R �' ,I �i,,55��,�.t"F +1. s, �,�tc (�s ✓it�� � �' 4 4"" u"', i T cd '+ r9 w MEMORANDUM Date: November 14, 1997 LUUJ J tir To: Planning Division w o. From: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator, 1 d Subject: Variance for 0't_e ,!8432 Olympic View Dr.) (V-97-145)` v Z F. ®� The application has'been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The applicant will need to comply with all the terms of any future permits. Issuance of a building permit may require installation of a storm water detention facility. The u0, application is complete at this time, ow UJ x u. cUJ u" 0 z i o: MYOF EDMONN ENGINEERING DIVISION 7145.DOC F*7 r7 ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT / STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT " VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER Applicant cm n ('S V Address 663 z lq ZGti FEE f 13 Z.. "' RECEIPT# (ace7Z HEARING DATE 0HE ❑ STAFF L) PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ APPEALED _ Phonel Property Address or Location SrY 3 Z- Property Owner �77o pz,? e—!� Phone Address SSck �a / G "r- 0196 e Y/,ve Phone 9";PC Z 2 % 2-9 Address ko Z Z Z / 2 7,4 S `74 .347 Tax Acc # 4-H � 002001030 1 Sec. OK Twp. � 7^ng. rc- Legal Description t- © T '" Details of Project or Proposed Use �'a -( let f t r -5 D h -6kts 71AI6 / --r v ' The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorneys fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this applimtion. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT ®.- ON Ln Wa tip LA UJ1 -�2 J F—I UY LL W O N Oi Z Lu UJ:. to W W �\ U. _ Z. ` �3 h` ." P15 ` 0 85 LL 0 VA z D 0 a ul LL- 0 z 451 z Lu u '0 o Lj- 0 u- 0 J LLJ LLi C. Ij Lf) z Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer SOILS • FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN &PERMIT • LEGAL 17814 8th Ave. N.W. • Seattle, Washington 98177 - (206) 546-9217 0