00183 (2),
comprehensiveif a rezone is to be done a should be done ufthe '
entire—--downtown
f what he can do with the and that '."~^.. owners_
« ��/a� OClie also added thatmt rezoning
of the properties— purchased--- .rties and that the ��meu�eu
would^reduce--indicated
change would not be in accordance with the unn~^.~.
��=US-
in
her home, but she was concerned for the residents of the Finnigan t Apart-
ments who would lose their view if an apartment building were cons ructed
next to them. The public portion of the hearing was then closed.
COMMISSIONER SITTAUER MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DICKSON, TODENY_
I NO BECAUSE . THE PRESENT ZONING IsICOMPATIBLE'
,GOOD.- POSITION, TO,BE ZONED BC,1A
titioners asked to downzone their property he was in favor
of it and that even if it is ^'"~~ to the BC zone 'e felt density sho
inted out that only
be decreased if-possible.CommissionerCommissioner McGibbon poi
nted
one property owner in this particular block wasrequstj� the �w�one '
Chairman Naughten stated that he would vote against the motion for the
m
same reasons given by commissioner Goodh»pe and at he felt this block
d it will all
does have a residential character and if it is not dmx"zonethe most
precious possession « person be apartments within ten years. commissioner Hall stated, that n
has is his home and that these particular
komes arewell kePt. She »« sjd»e wished there were some intermediate
zoning to assure their view would not be blotted out and they would not
be be overwhelmed by another apartment. x«»uCALL VOTE ��"^`^N�`y[S�.&WD
WIJH COMM��lON[R5~�lTTAU[V``0lC%3ON: RO3S,'AND;M'Glnoon vo/ILaBelle
n V0TlM��0 �Comm s�1oner
xumnummnum nx"""`"", "".~.--, -- HALLm
was not p during "is hearing. THE MOTION CARRIED' A short recess
was announcedg `"""""during this
Commissioner LaBelle arrived.
ZO-9-77 =""'���^t �— �—�—n—�- l2'l3'20 - 12.13,20 of the Zoning Code for
changes in the Commercial Waterfront (CN)Zone
Ms. ChaMpsnn said the city Council had requested that the Staff establish
distinguish one zone from anotker'
design districts and design elements which "'se Th Shorelines Advisory
The CH zone was being addressed at this time' G Grant and Floyd
Committee had been invited to this discussion, and George u some of the
Smith were introduced from that Comwittee. Also present were
people who live on the waterfront, Mx. Charleson listed five primary
design elements which exist in every zone and differentiate onezone
from another. They were: lighting, landscaping, cirxulation, u,`o
volume or scale, and sinnaoe. She said the purpose this evening was as
� to determine how
these eleo`ent, should distinguish the cV zone.
�rjw a
� d that everything in the cV zone i, water/boat oriented m use s
n»n: important determining factor, It was suggested that pedestrian
"rr' should he encouraged and that such thing� as piers might be provided
use rmit contact between land and water to provide services for boaters.
c» permit ^ d with remarks that views of the water
Height of buildings was disnuss« ` * of height could be
Treduced,
should not be blocked and that appearance
for instance on the old Merry Tiller Building by changing the roof line
! the bujldjnn It was also
t mansard and using horizontal wood siding »» eto shjeld'pedestrians
- --��teu that the building, could have overhangs � suggested
weather, and could use windows to allow views of the water.
� /`""' ` t d^th t the industrial zone is out of place on the
! It *a» c«mnendethutathe Union Oil property could he used for future
\ waterfront and
agreed that safety nreoautions should be developed in
� parking.
j z ith th jlroad trvcks and that parkinV lots should be
' conjunct conjunction w e railroad
well landscaped.
!
�
' EDMON0S PLANNING COMMISSION
' Page 3 - October 12, 1977
'U �
�--_� �.