00913rns was of the opinion that food development
continue to bedeleterious
Councilman Ca yards and he .felt
he
to the neighbIgs. Heobjectedd thatneighborhood
not having Y COUNCILMAN
family dwellings. ficial to the owners of the un�=E�FARE. CIUNCI MARNS
open space would not be beneficial
THE IiJTEREST OF THE PUBLIC
NOTION: THEN MOVED TO DE PRO-2-78
JDED THE MOTION FOR DISCUSSION. Councilman Clement felt that if the
G00LD.SECOt proper He liked the idea of clustered housing.
(Failed) art to that property
plan were amended it could be P P protest rights for sewer
His objections dealt with ahreguirementsfor ra waiver oev+could be i condition that
and he suggested there beAttorney Jim Murphy said the attached to
LIDS in that area. City articipate in the LID even though-they-wereof phase II was too
the owners would have to p
must unanimously petition
knoll should have no more than 10 units. He also suggested
Lynnwood. Councilman Clement also thought the overall density
high, He felt the third
that the open space covenant require that all owners changes in regard to
Councilman Herb said he was against the motion
the City Council before the Council could ever hear an would preserve
development of the open spacebeautiful piece of land and the proposal of housing
because this property is a
Plan calls for a variety
about 800 of it. He pointed out that the Policy
th
Brous. He also noted that imperiousfeeling
further, if the vrhole site were to be subdivided and accesse ns on Nor
types and, da g Councilman Car
Meadowdale Beach Road it vrou�dnbmumewith this proposal. CorIInunitY Develop -
surfaces would be kept to auld WO points-* First, he took excep-
was that this much
clustered
aTo rellehasked gto clarafy somnoafic tion of the hearings id
ment Director John L
tion to the statements made against the manner o family. With regard to
r he said that all of the Tans if itewere�single fame into would securethe LID, itFurther, Attorney
be subject to the same assessmentsace, he said the City
further development of the open space,current
space in perpetuity. He said thatroximately experience4a schooltage childhat in per
in open spa He pointed out that the
family dwellings of this size there in is this lovrer than that in the surrounding
unit, so.seven could be aro�ectaisdsubstantiallylower t. 18�764 sq• ft. He
overall density of this p to reduce the
residential develod be
pment,
developerthadhe lindicatedahe %-101 ell el also stated that the proposal
also stated that theft. formula. Mr. La the relationship of this prop
density to meet the 2,000 sc light. Regarding policy Plan is looking for,
traffic on that arterial is very recisely what thePolicy
open space and trees than
to the Policy Plan, he said this is P the policy osed to Phase II
and that this comes closer to implementing be
was a tradeoff for high density living. He
any other development. Councilman tJaughten said he `usual effect is not one of f
because he did not feel open spacethe
said he would favor a reduction k Phase II so could be done tastefully and not
apartment
s. He said lie would like to the development b to the west to hjudge
gee what
Meadowdal.e Rd. Councilman Gould felt He said it wa hefWasult concerned with
ruin the character of the neighborhood. plan had utilized some imagination
a single family development would do to this property.
en space. She said
ug htsthevrhousesould eweore well
runoff, however. Counof�the,+needslforen topught this p
and that it met many
comfortable with a lower density in Phase II but she thought
He thought they had to
uln
tion
design ed and the plan maintained naturalortetheam motion
had m'n1mCouncilnfelt
fir. LaTourelle asked that if t e
Councilman Nordquist said he would sup
consider the living envelopes. have to go through the entire
either plan.,
or something similar, was acceptable
dthat the Council not de CALL VOTE.;:
PRD outright as it would
eatanga new propos
a reat burden on his department. A RO
review process again, renting CgreaAMIS AND Nei jIST VOTING YES, .AND C001jCIL MEM6ER5
WAS THEN TAKEN, 4JITH C AND NAUGHTEN VOTING 1J0. t+;OTION FAILED. Discussion
HERB, CLEt1ENT, ALLEN, GOULD, proposal acceptable to the
then followed as to modifications which would make this P P putting the walkway
felt a walkway on 6Cth was crihtcbe given�to�P had to be bridged.
Council. It was jested that consideration mig
Mr. LaTourelle suggested SECO.,DED BY COUNCILt•1AN GOULD,
the other side of the street, even thought that is Lynnwood. as that is
on COUNCILi1AN CLEMIENT M0VED,
MOTION: the children ( E'CO�NTINUED TO AUGUST 1, 1978 AND THAT THE APPLICANT BE IWITH N `TO
<I ;THAT PRD-2-78 BE C ON FOR PHASE II TO 111CLUDE A MAXIMUM OF 10 UNITS AND AND PRE ET
0�ft:..49'`' .F AMEND HIS APPLICATION'
AND PREFERABLY 2: THAT A MOR1L�EQEIP��VIDEO PRECISE
MORE THAN 3 UNITS CON
NEC
BE SUBt1ITTED AS TO t{0'd THE SIDEWALK 0' EDMONDS CITY July 25t,C i 978INUTES
Page 4