01716rt
tA4
2. All open'space shall be commonly owned by the P.R.D., is
z
this acceptable to Edmonds?Eli
;
. {
3. The site is planned on being fenced off, is this acceptable
P 8 � P
�.
to Edmonds?
{
.`
IV. UtilitiesZ.
}
1. Is their sufficient water pressure to service the proposed
plan and fire hydrants off of 172nd .
2. Are their any special fire dept requirements for this::
project?
3. The project will have a central garbage pick up so no trucks
.
o into the site is this•adee table E
8 � p to Edmonds?
, ..
IIV Units
1. We plan to use the roofs as garden decks, is this acceptable
to Edmonds, if.this is above the 25".- 0" height?
`r 4
2. Can stairs to the roof or garden trellis on the roof exceed
the 25' - 0" building height?
3. Can the building height of 25' - 0" be determined to the top'
y
of the roof membraine and not et? ara
P P
4. The plan shows a minimum of 10' - 0" between units, is this
acceptable to Edmonds?
50 On 172nd and other common property boundries a 20' - 0" set:
back is proposed, is this acceptable to Edmonds?;
6. Can the unbuildable portion of 72nd be counted as the
�'
setback for the housing units ad road?
adjacent to
r
Please respond to any elements to,the plan beyond these questions you wish
to. Your help in a speedy response will be most appreciated. If I can be
of anyhelp
. P Please Deli 623-0331.
r.
Sincerely yours,
WHITELEY, JACOBSEN & ASSOCIATES
1
Robert . C n on
RFMC/kgs