Loading...
07-0247 Plan Review Comments.pdf CE ITY OF DMONDS th • 1215 AN•E,WA98020 VENUEORTHDMONDS P: 425.771.0220 • F: 425.771.0221 • W:www.ci.edmonds.wa.us HONEAXEB DSD: P•E•B EVELOPMENT ERVICES EPARTMENTLANNINGNGINEERING UILDING April 12, 2007 Mr. Randall Munson Email: Randy.Munson@comcast.net RE: PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS FOR PLAN CHECK # 2007-0247 TH FALCON RIDGE HOMES NEW SFR AT 8010 – 240 ST SW Dear Mr. Munson: I have reviewed the above building permit application for the Planning Division and it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications will need to be addressed before review can continue: Lot Shape and Lot Area: 1. The boundaries of the subject property and the total lot area as shown on the site plan conflict with those shown on the recorded short plat (File No. S- 2005-38). Please correct the site plan to reflect what was recorded. This includes showing the boundaries of the hammerhead at the end of Tract A, updating the lot area shown to 9,268 square feet, and updating the dimensions of the lot. Setbacks: 2. Show the minimum required 7.5-foot setback lines from all property lines (including from the boundary of the hammerhead at the end of Tract A) in order to ensure that the proposed residence meets the required setbacks. Rockeries/Retaining Walls: 3.Rockeries and retaining walls are not permitted to exceed 3 feet over original grade where they are located within the setbacks. Therefore, please provide top of wall and original grade elevations along the proposed rockeries/retaining walls at 5-foot intervals to ensure that the walls do not exceed 3 feet over original grade where they are within the minimum required setbacks. Note that the bottom of wall elevations should still be shown, but they do not impact the Planning Division’s determination of whether the rockeries/retaining walls may be located within the setbacks. Lot Coverage: 4.Lot coverage is defined as the total ground coverage of all buildings or structures on a site measured from the outside of external walls or supporting members or from a point 30 inches in from the outside edge of the eaves, whichever covers the greatest area. Note that since stairs and decks that are more than 3 feet over original grade are considered to be structures, the portion of the stairs to the front entrance that are more than 3 feet over original grade must be included in the lot coverage calculations. Additionally, all portions of the upper floor that project over the lower floor must also be included in the lot coverage calculations. It is difficult to determine what was included in the lot coverage quantity stated on the site plan. Therefore, please provide a breakdown of the lot coverage calculations on the site plan. The lot coverage calculations must also be updated to reflect the change to the total lot area as required for the site plan to match the recorded short plat, which stated a total lot area of 9,268 square feet. Height Calculations: 5. Please make the following corrections to your height calculations: a.The datum point is labeled as “existing rim rim.” It appears that this is a typo. Please clarify what the rim is of (i.e. rim of manhole cover, catch basin, etc.). b.The height rectangle should be expanded to include the portion of the upper floor that projects over the lower floor on the southern side of the residence. Please move Points C and D of your height rectangle to the south so that the upper floor cantilever is included in the height rectangle. Please also provide updated elevations of these two points and update your height calculations including the maximum allowable height. If the maximum allowable height decreases due to the new locations of Points C and D, please update the proposed height so that it is below the maximum. c.Show the updated average grade, maximum allowed height, and proposed height on the building elevations. SEPA: 6. The grading plan states that the total quantity of cut will be 1,042.48 cubic yards. Note that if either grading quantity (cut or fill) exceeds 500 cubic yards, SEPA review is required. Please either reduce the proposed grading quantities below 500 cubic yards or complete the enclosed SEPA checklist and submit it with an adjacent property owner list including the addresses of all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject property (refer to the enclosed handout for instructions on compiling the adjacent property owner list). Please note that a $420 fee will be required for the SEPA review. Geotechnical Report: 7. The geotechnical report submitted with the application was conducted prior to the subdivision which created the subject property. However, a current geotechnical report by a qualified professional is required to review the proposed building plans and to address the requirements of ECDC 23.40 and 23.80. Please have a qualified geotechnical engineer review the proposed house plans and write a report that meets the requirements of ECDC 23.40 and 23.80. Tree Removal: 8. It is noted that some of the trees located on the subject property must be removed in order to locate a residence on the site. However, several of the trees shown as to be removed on the site plan are far enough away from the proposed residence that they could be retained. Please update your site plan to show that the trees that are not located within the building footprint or within the immediate vicinity of the building footprint will be retained. Please submit three copies of the updated site plan (at least one copy must be reduced in size) and only two copies of any affected sheets of the building plans. Please make all submittals to a Development Services Permit Coordinator, Monday through Friday, 9:00 am to noon or 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (425) 771-0220, ext. 1224. I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, Development Services Department - Planning Division Jen Machuga, Planner