The URL can be used to link to this page

20020830.pdfDATE RECEIVED BYALMY�ID9Ll� CITY OF EDMONDS 1:7c0 PERMIT APPLICATION 232io 1�r�, PI. w . QITY 21P TELEPHONE �r I D,I�S 9ig�2L LCic-24�- ZIP PERMIT EXPIRES usE y� PERMIT ZONE ij' NUMBER Q�/_ _4 <-,, -t?(J ADD SOflESb,QL, - �UUITE/APTM PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION N0. I LOTNO, LID NO. _ LID FEE $_ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP •— r P'V'a1OY nW Pormh Peyul�eE EXISTING PROPOSED Svem Vee reemu neRa erAemA Becwred REBURIED DEDICATION F uaa�e Aix nenuveE - owe ---------------- Winne rpuire0 METER SIZE LINE S12E NO. OF FI%TURES PRV REQUIRED YES O NO ❑ REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLtnaAIM-1 �� • a bt S. W £ ZH, CITY SIt PHONE FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE H11" _ 901426 -U(, 632--31DOO STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR — INSPECTION BOND EM£tiz i C? kJ t OZ� i L$V6T@E REQ'D POSTED DYES 13NO S PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. $EPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED ❑ NEW ®. NSIDENTIAL PLUMBING/MECN EXP 10T COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGEOFUSE ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR O REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN ING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REGDARKPROYIOED EPAIR GRADING CVDS FENCE 0 DEMOLISH 0 TANK X�_t'r ❑ OTHER REMARKS-'�—�--- 0 GARAGE RETAINING WALL ❑ CARPORT ❑ pOCK ERV FIRE SPRINKLER C]FIRE ALARM E (TYPE OF USE, SUSINESB OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: bR NUMBER CHECKED BY TYPE OF CO TP. CTION CODE OCCUPANT /J [ NUMBED OF CRITICAL AREASNUMBE Li GROUP 00 � STOfl1E6 l/'1'/J't` UNIT$LING �� SPECIAL INSPECTION AREA OCCUPANT DEtIB�E 1Va0RK TO BE DONE REQUIRED ❑ YES LOAD , 8e.�7 REMARKS (� PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 700/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 'ID d" W e 1 t $ �.RJ ew _ Description FEE Description FEE HEAT SOURCE Plan Check Lt v State Surcharge pI GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit 0 City Surcharge 6 PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing THIS PERYT AUTHORIZES ONLYTHE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO G BE DONE ON PRIVATEPpOPERfY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTIONONTHEPUBLLC Mechanical ,BE (CURBS, or- EWALKS,DRIVEWAYS, MAgOUES,k?C.)WILL REQUIRE Grading s SEPARAYEPERMISIKRL PERYITAPPLICATION: ISO DAYS Engr. Review PERYIT SEE BACK OF PINK PERMITFOR MORE INFORMIATIONrea DAYS Engr. inspection LPLICANT. ON INTER BEHALF ASSIGNS AND T, AGRE TO IN EMNIFY, DEFEND AND HC INSSOLD HARMLESS HECIITY OF Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit ED CLAAM WASHIROTOR , ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FgOM ANYAND ALL CLAIMS FOR OgMAGEb Fire lnapeCilOn OF WHATEVER NATURE, AgISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE Of THIS PERMIT, ISSUANCE OF THIS R8C01PI # PERMIT SHALL NOT BE = DEEMED TO MODIFY, NAIVE OR REDU ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR LIMIT IN Landscape insp. Total Amt. WAY THE C,ICE ANY M18ILITY Tp ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PgpWS10N.' Due - I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I NAVE REgO THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE Recording Fee Receipt # INFORMATION GIVETOM.N IS CURRcC7: AND THAT 1 AM THE OWNER, OR THE DL/LY AUTHORI2ED AGENT OF THE OWNS. 1 AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS APPLICATION APPROVAL REGULATING CONSTRUC. IN .IN.WORKAUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL This applicoLion Isnoteparmll until s:gnod by the INVIAND IN VIOLATION OF TMF. LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELAYING TO WORKMEN5 COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND PCW 18.27. FOR INSPECTION eulitlin o�llPtls r k"llrpoputy: pal FeoA ero pall, and Ipl lsncknawlud_eod to space provldad, SIGNATUR (OWNE OR AGENT) GATE SIGNED tg2C) OFF G ALA• NAT DATE{ 1 U / `'B �D 771-022® ATTENTION RE ED BY DATE IT EXr 1333 IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- / CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL. FILE YELLOW.I SPEC R BAroz - PRESS HARD -YOU ARE PRESS ESSOR MAILINGS COPIES PINK�OWNER GCOUNTING AC z O m C0 In In m0 O C C IT rn � Z n mm_ ON r m Zn -i 2 2 2 N z i q 35 m ,� l r �1 � .a ,. ii�'� � `��:r� � ..�`` �. .4s f[t MICROFILM] E, Design Collaborative _ . 1736 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE A 77 I t. " SEATTLE, WA 981034.1502 " T206,254.2670 ! F206.254.2571 C• MEMORANDUM tE r> PROJECT: 23210 75th Place West WJA PROJECT NO: 0117 j TO: Ann Bullis DATE: 16-Oct-02 ZO4'; COMPANY: City of Edmonds Bldg Svcs TIME: 2:30PM FROM: Brian Moll PAGES: 1 m I REGARDING: Owner Re -Occupation M S. m0= Ann � Per your request: rn m i'. We believe that the site at 23210 75th Place West has been restored sufficiently close to its condition iz j to the slide/flow which undermined a portion of the garage , driveway and landscaping this past prior weekend. After examining the extent of the restoration in place on 15 October 2002 at 5:00 pm, and c y discussions with the Geotechnical representative Deb Ladd of Landau Assoc. we feel the site has been stabilized sufficiently so that the owner may re -occupy the main portion of the house, excluding �y y# the deck and the garage which still require some restoration work. Visual inspection of the garage ®N does not show any significant signs of structural distress, and there were no other signs of any O movement of the exterior of the main house which would trigger or warrant further study. Please do not hesitate to contact me if i can be of further assistance Of Brian E. Moll, PE, SE "Senior Structural Engineer 2. WJA Design Collaborative rn' 1736 Fourth Avenue South, Suite A z Seattle, WA 98134-1502 O T 206.254.2570 m F 206.254.2571 ' ( www.wjadc.com I . .. - r I: i 75thPlaceWestRestoration-memo460ct2002.x1s Page i of t , j L _tLIMITED ENTRY 0 OFF LIMITS TO UNAUTHORIZED PERSONNEL f This structure has been damaged and safety DATE:, 10h e, Z22. is questionable. Entry permitted only as q TIME: _5C)T>M described below and at own risk. , _ 1 Aftershocks or other events may result in death or injury. This structure was inspected under emergency conditions for I RESTRICTIONS ON USE: the CITY OF EDMONDS.on the Entry for emergency purposes only i date and, time noted. Other Inspector iti s & ID Number: £ Structure Name -and Address: ' -- ,- i'D tom. DO NOT REMOVE THIS PLACARD UNTIL AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNING AUTHORI f Y I��tjA� 4 t/^A, its 9(jp • •, f C I^mot 1 L 1 Design Collaborative Y! . ■ 1738 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE A - SEATTLE' WA 9SION-1502 - T 206.2-570 Y F 206.25,12571 ' v�v.wlatic.can MEMORANDUM PROJECT: 23210 75th Place- West _ _ _ __WJA PROJECT NO:-___0117 y TO: Noel Miller DATE: 21-Oct 02 _ COMPANY. City of Edmonds Public Works _ — _ TIME: 1:00 PM FROM: Brian Moll - — - ----- ---- PAGES - ---1 ---- --- - rn, r REGARDING:. Re-alrlReStoration Dwgs _ 1 Noel, Attached are the sealed Repair/Restoration Drawings for the 23210 75th Place West Residence. am m These drawings indicate the structural work, in conjunction with the earthwork recommended by -t C: Landau Associates, necessary to restore the residence to its condition prior to the slide/flow which undermined a portion of the garage, driveway and landscaping this past weekend. m As we had no knowledge of the condition of the house prior to the slide, we cannot know with any p _ a degree of certainty, what if any structural deficiencies were in existance at that time preceding the event. Furthermore; our review of the house after the slide/flow was limited to a visual reconnaissance of the garage and the exterior of the main house. These visual inspections did not rn reveal any significant signs of structural distress, and no signs of movement of the exterior of the ni main house which would trigger or warrant further study. We have noted,however, that there is an I existing post in the garage shored up under the northeast running beam over the center of the 055 garage. This post is not shown on the house drawings dated 12 september 1978 supplied by the In - owner to the City of Edmonds. It does not appear to be anchored adequately in both principal eC Tar directions as required in the UBC. While this is an existing condition and outside the scope of our m o restoration/repair recommendations, we would encourage the owner to have the post reviewed by 4 registered design professional, keeping also in mind that the post may also be subject to vehicle impact loads. We have also observed that the northeast wall of the garage does not sit fully on the stemwall. Daylight is visible through it, as well as existing shims and spiderwebs, indicating it was also z an existing condition. WJA takes no responsibility for these and other existing conditions of which we z are unaware due to our limited knowledge of the house, and limited scope of our inspection. w We believe the restoration earthwork observed, together with discussions with the Geotechnical representative from Landau Associates, that the geotechnical aspects of the slide/flow has been mitigated. We further believe that work installed, in conformance with the intent of our submitted rn sealed drawings, will restore the damaged portion of the house to a condition that meets or exceeds, what we believe to be, its condition prior to the slide/flow. Please do not hesitate to contact me if i can be of further assistance Brian E. Moll, PE, SE I Senior Structural Engineer 1 CITY COPY 75thPlamWestRestoration-memoll•r 86ct2002.x1s Page 1 of 1 y CRI'Ot.0 P,SOC1h1ES {l;f IOr31j't0 .O:;I P.tU+.rol, RECEIVED t, OCT 3 0 2002 MICROFILM - ENGINEEMG DIVISION LANDAU ASSOCIATES Field Report M*Jw2aNfGCrtOY Iwnv MY. ➢C l Report No.: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 - s - Project No.; 74 105 --- 10l21102 J� 10151 c :; 10/2 Date: 10/23/02 Client. City of Edmonds 10/25/02 i�l�t ✓ c :, i 10/29/02 Z r Project Name: 75th Place Waterline Break =; Location: Edmonds, near Lake Ballinger R. Weather Conditions: variable - sunny, mild to cool, to99Y =f'T coM° j By: D. Ladd: �b4Q: �m o , i 10/21/02 Data Ladd was onsitn from 1100-MO aspAtNc` Jy O0 J� T; j documentcon I stopped by in the morning to observe anvdi d Emerald Cons'truction.�fwon racor � � m� 1 with rytof about his planned activities. During my PTerry } with a 3 man crew (including Terry) for Emerald. Z excavators and a hackhoe were onsite, along r ' was compacting a crushed rock base coarse inside the garage with a walls Atthet me oEny arrival,Te<ry about 5 8 inches thick. I could probe the base , p l; behind, "sled", compactor. The base course layer was I spoke with Terry about providing additional compaction to tighten o I course about 4 — 6 inches in areas. up the base course material — he conveyed that he planned on doing additional compaction. m m s 1 m i and the working on the initial layer of rocks on the eol dillec ®� . ' The rest of the contractor crew was The initial behind the rocks. The drain pipe was placed ingrain rock, wrapped with g o result n a slope nea or { pipe placement t of rocks, although sin jar to the pre failure condition,was estimated V the corner. Accordingly, I requested that the rocks n that area be shifted Q r steeper than 1H:1 at southeast outward slightly (about 1-2 ft). ithNoel Miller in the afternoon about site activities. Noel conveyed that I left the site at 1130. 1 spoke wwould be needed. I conveyed the slope construction had continued and that it appeared that more rocks the rocks was adjusted so that the slope could be flattened. Z that the placement of { 10122/02 Deb Ladd was onsitn from 1010-1125 and 1335 -1410 the visit, the contractor had ZU - I stopped by inthe morning to observe and doatmsite conditions. Prior to beneath the planned concrete slab. The crushed � 0ent m placed and compacted a crushed rock base in the garage bas in this area could typically be probed about 1-2 aches. the center post of the garage was the backfll behind the rock slope had t rock supported at this time and form work bad been started. in addition and compacted to a firm condition. During my visit, Noel Miller the City, the homeowner been issues, including the need for placed her son-in-law (Barbaraand Roger) discussed landscape and others site and additional rock ;o buildup the slope near the edge of the driveway. that the contractor had placed additional rocks and had wth grid y During my afternoon visit, I observed floor and foundations. A load of rockery rock arrived at the stte i and rebaz steel for the concrete garage during my visit. ' t.AN0Au ASSOCIATES - `O,D'tli 1%UN0AI! VAINN00iDATA1$NAREDOG�C1At'D$11tl21aZ,ilOS.E,7,a.tlec 1 �,ia 'if 6�d4 l �DP,O �S�oCIa1�S IKC lUt6U1i0 .U::i F t Uln1ta 10123102 Dob Ladd was onsite from 1430 -1445 {, l I stopped by in the afternoon to observe anti document site conditions. The the cant slab in the garage had been earlier in the day. The contractor is working on - . and the patio of the downhill residence poured fill that was placed in the driveway to allow the concrete trucks to pour the slab. to t removing the excess addition, many of the slope rocks have been placed and drain rock in the ditch near the roadway has been Opeazirain placed. At the time of my visit, terry is not onsite, a dnew preparee foor lacing therator At this time, the contractor is beginning place P pipe i-eren Cxont of and` z 0, working. the slab. The fill that has been placed behind rocks in the rock slope has been well compacted garage cangenerally be. probed about 2 4 inches: m i 10/25102 Deb Ladd was onsito from 1300 -1315 and _4 'n � i stopped by n the afternoon to observe and document site conditions. Site work: is nearly complete the contractor with 2-mn crew consisting of Terry and the laborer: C o hg. j landscaping has started. I observed se course beneath planned the asphalt driv At the tun of my arrival, the base had been placed and 2-4 inches with moderate pressure. I m O ;. initially compacted: The base material could be probed about he make at ;least two more passes with the plate compactor they were (recommended co the contractor that j using. While unsitc, Noel Miller (City), Terry (Emerald), Roger (the owners son-in-law), and I discussed one last visit to Observe O desired driveway layout and the grade. I spoke with tent' and Noel about the asphalt work planned for Tuesday. Cy - i subgrade conditions prior to C 10/29/02 Deb Ladd was onsito from 1100. 1130 0 -n ,. I stopped by for a final site visit to observe and document site conditions. Landscaping has been partly beneath the 23210 residence driveway has been compacted rn to r. ade completed. The base course subgr robed less than }addition since my, last visit and is now very firm. The base course can be typically p to support the planned asphathat O N i about i inch under moderate to high pressure and is judged suitable residence she conveyed her unders, - 210 100 meownow O F vi i section. I spoke briefly with the done her ry to add topsoil anti hark and otanrk the area cut edge of additional landscaping as going netiro concreteome ' � minor the pa'nhingresidence.e around the trellis and pavers. She -also pointed orbs also needed landscaping the old garage slab. Additional � - Note — I spoke by phone with Tetry Johnson of Ewasai planned or ThurstaUc[ 3lYed the homeowners P it comments —he noted that additional landscaping ; z Visitors: none - A itt Unsatisfactory Conditions and Recommended Correction: none 1 ' Attachments: none Distribution: City, Evergreen/Adjustment Services E-)4 s Signed , r LANDAU ASSOCIATES •,03,2 ,NDAUk4AI WOLPDATA%5MtiaEDDUDT<,t05�102:03; e; 1.6,1,B.Ecc2 11 salt" 77ti 64dj �'.iP�U x3aUC;kiES IIiC _ IOli2r�2 ;3:13 P.l�i;014 RECEIVED MIC OFILM OCT 21 W LANOAu Field Report wC_UWM wwu awul ecoeo rcxi wnu �r�s Report No.: 1 Project No.: 74 t05 Date: 10114102 Client: City of Edmonds Project Name: 75th Place Waterline Break Location: Edmonds, near Lake Ballinger Weather Conditions: sunny, mild__ Prepared By: D.Ladd i i Dob Ladd was onsite from 0950 — 9115 and 9349 to 1500 Landau Associates received a call from Jeannine Crraf of the City of Edmonds to respond to a mudslide at the apparently caused by a broken City waterline late Saturday night (early Sunday rnorning- I Scoit Highline(, pl) 01 site at 1000 and met with: Jeannine Graf, Noel Miller, Don Fiene, Jim Waite (: p'a, 1>11, a structtual engineer from WJA. During the the City and Brain MaRernoon visit, I met with Terry Johnson of Emerald Constructionand Noel Miller. j l City personnel described the history of the incident, They noted that they were able to isolate She i waterline leak to a section of residential service line, apparently parallel to the east side of 75°i Ave W. i The residential service line was located above die house where the soil failure occurred, a house i addressed as 23210 75's Place W. The waterline leak apparently caused slope failure of the driveway and W, into a residence part of the garagwhiche slab at 23210, which liquefied and flowed across 75°i Place addressed as 23211(the `downhill' residence) When I arrived on the site, the water leak had been stopped by isolating the leaking section of the service i line. The mudslide was apparently caused by water from the leak flowing beneath the mound surface and saturating existing flit in the vicinity of the garage and driveway. The saturated fill was retained initially by a "rockery slope" until the soil and water loads exceeded the strength of the slope. The slope likely old like nature of the failure. The failed soil consists of a mixture of sand, failed quickly leading to the liq silt, and gravel from the former fill. The mudslide involved movement of soil beneath the residential driveway and garage of 23210. City personnel reported that the water was observed bubbling up through the debris at a location generally east 6 fr below the remaining of the central part of the garage at an elevation at least off the water and the flow hceased about surface. Ty lO noted that the rate of this seepage was affected by turning minutes after the water was shut off. The slide caused fill fran beneath the driveway and the adjacent garage (attached to the lower level of the 231v20 residence) to flow across 7S" Place and into the backyard i of the 23211 residence on the cast side of 75 Place. The mud and debris varied between about 2 and 4 ft' thick in the 23210 residence drivewaY/garage area. 'file mudflow traveled across the 75v' Place roadway: No major distress or disturbance ofthe roadway was observed during the October 14, 2002 visit. However, pieces of the upper part of a small (est mated 3-4 Ct high) stacked concrete slab wall were moved off the top of. the wall. This wall may need rebuilding. The mud wits about 2 to 3 8 thick in die backyard of 23211, The mudslide had moved "415 man" sized rockery rocks, other concrete pieces, and a flagpole into the backyard of this residence. Tlie LANDAU Assoc1ATz-$ 1011,0214ANOAV MAINtVLei�OATA�`+APE9000T•1�OSIOI�G2;�•:�.dCC I �aiS 110 640� l,4NOP.0 4S30t1h1@3 IBC (OJIOl0i :3.13 P,f03/011 had traveled to near the west edge of the residence and a small amount o£ muddy water had sailed mud beneath a patio door. Some mud also flowed around the north side of the house. 6< vertical soil slope was exposed on the north side f le ea t, At the time of my visit, a nearly soil.Thefill (see sketch map). This slope showed several different layers of fill overlying g 4 to 5 tt thick (or greater) on the northwest side of the slope {adjacent to thickness is estimated at about the garage) increasing to> than, about 8 ft thick on the southwest part of the slope near the garage comer The fill soil consisted of a silty foundation. The fill thickness appeared to increase to the South and east. sand to sand with silt and gravel. Cleaner sand Zones were observed n a layer about 3 4 ft below the top foundation on the south side of the till beneath the garage and in zones beneath and around the stem wall was moist on the northeast side of the exposed slope and became . �' , of the garage. The fill soil generally j wetter on the west part of the slope, adjacent to the building footing/roof drains. The soil adjacent to the of soil remaining m southeast comer of the garage was saturated over a large area. The moisture condition be assessed because or concrete slabs that were covering the slope. i beneath the garage could not q m N F During the morning visit we discussed the general approach'to stabilize and repair the area. Primary include quarry-spaals against the exposed soil bank to reduce 2 C m ` t j components of the stabilization placing additional sloughing and completing other measures that will help to support the remaining part of the discussed placing CDF beneath the m ® s , concrete slab in the garage so that the parked car does not. We also and supporting the center post of the garage. other general site restoration C = f south stem wall foundation issues including rebuilding the driveway and rockery slope were also discussed. m M H 8 During the afternoon visit, Terry Johnson and I looked at the site and discussed the planned approach. of the soil slopes. At c ¢' Teary conveyed that he expected it would tzkc about a day to get initial stahiti�ation when we thought it would be sate for the resident at the downhill house to this time, Noel Miller asked u the residence. I recommended that we wait one more day for additional soil and large debris to m m d reoccupy be removed and some soil drainage to occur. mm During the morning visit, City crews removed excess soil and other debris from the 75°i place roadway. from the roadway by the time of the afternoon visit. a to 1 Most of the debris and mud had been removed Z. 1 Visitors: see repot i Unsatisfactory Conditions and Recommended Correction: Z Attachments: general site map - Distribution: City. Evergreen Adjustment Services - - _ Z O m Signed { 1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES It 1< 1, t0i18i02 «IANOAV MAINNeI�a>TAISNPIXE00001n.OS101<01: qt Aoc ` Lf:'t�0 cC:�iE� II(C lorlsru2 !3:13 P,IC4rC16 LANDAU ASSOCIATES Project No. By t� L^• ` Date ��'x�J2-Project %5%}°• pl'r..ct= 'rJY-?��✓^!c J Xd-r..r SeT'a %•�!• Sheet, —of__ Checked By Data ED/ Subject Ger II'L� 11,11 Ij/ I Ij�,l•1�-IIl , I) �`J `-•�,��I"I I�L� ,JIj Ii I�I��r I(iI' I,�7,!h�1J�Ii - � III �..I1.1[IJ�1 �IIII�I; jI'��I'!:I T�IIb� III, ,II• �I it itt �T if II-Il�t I,I , 1 +73 ! f. 1 1E K7, I i,I IIII �Jl11 II I II ill�Fl l i I'' 'II\I'11�11 II t'I I,>I•. I ` .I f`�rl`,IY-� I I. - • .fJ' t21�3 r o ntCcl I_ IEN� i I ✓�I. II ' I'( , i(L%Yj..illll- .ti��\'.I II (-{Ii. I., f'' ✓� }\t I�� I. I .hy , 1 1 r�� I i f � ,. I II -d' I V i �' i I I ( I... i I ,lil',ijll i, Y 1 17,r,II i I - i;il:I-rl'i•��",1-il T: I I (✓a- I I ( I..7ZI Fi I{.. 1 Iiil -I I. (1 II%i�z) II I 17 7.L ;ili II I IIi IIII I1 I• r l�ll.11 J I- i I II I' I 1iI I' _ I.,I i'I, _-ll ICI! t 'lll. il'V�I.illl 1��;:'fl Iil. l Iiil L) I ill 'r I I l I f (I: 1 i I, II 1.t I i i III I j l I I , I i l_ I I• k I I .I.I I T: ..ti II III ,•I� 1 � ��II .l!.;'IIII � _ Irlri .II�I,IIiII 111.i1 Iij.i ,i il, f'i�'I ,II , i r IIIjjVtl�li..l�l'I -{ I �- I, Iljl�l� 'I !''lli� ,•III III�'I il�`..I ill. l (-I. I' i I'i i �' � I Fe•u�.e,�moz • ��ia i7� 6vCj " "��bU >i��OC:kiEiIPC Ia112�82 :3:14 P.1�3;C1� j LANDAU L! ASSOCIATES Field Report I - - Report No.: 2 - - Project No.: 74 105 Client: City of Edmonds Date: 110/15102 Project Name: 75th Place Wat�dine Break Location: Edmonds, near Lake Ballinger -4 !. Weather Conditions: sunny, mild O t m Prepared By: D. Ladd ;) s Deb Ladd was onslto from 0900 —1215 and 1520 -1645 r]�}[tt 0 I arrived onsite at about 0900 to observe initial site-arthwork at the request ofNocl Miller and Brian ^i v G Moll. At the time of my arrival,emerald Construction was removing wet/loose soil from near the s driveway of the 23210 rt sidencc The construction crew included Terry Jackson the excavator operator, from the downhill residence. Rocks from the 0 � ; C and a laborer. The contractor also removed soil and debris rockery slope were separated and stockpiled onsite. During my morning visit 1 observed 4 buck and pup Z combinations in -hauling quarry-spaals (3 loads) and oversize spanls (1 load). The tricks back -hauled the wet soil and debris from the site, Additional loads of l were Drought to the site throughout the materia 0 day. During the initial part of the morning -,isit I spoke with Noel Miller and Pam Lemcke (City) and Terry briefly describing issues to he addressed. rn m O Jackson (Emerald C:onstructiony and provided a draft workplan At 0930 the I" load of quarry-spaats arrived. After removing loose and wet soils to a suitable subgrade, the exposed slope. Suitable subgrade z n the contractor placed the quarryspaals against thennrtheast part of of soil that had not begin disturbed by the mudslide and that was medium dense or denser fill (or i a consisted native soil) that could be typically probed about 1-3 inches with a %: inch steel rod. While onsite, I ;U provided the contractor information about the depth of material that needed to be removed to reach morning the contractor continued to remove loose wet soil (usually S suitable subgrade, During my visit, the excavator) from the 23x 10 residence driveway and placed quarry spaats against exposed soil. with The contractor carefully removed the broken pieces of the concrete garage stall that lay on the failed soil in was shoveled by hand because of the limited working slope be neath the garage. Loose soil this area co (, space beneath the garage. i e the slope beneath the garage. After the concrete slabs were removed I observed a wet, clean sand layer hon was of the fill that had been placed n m The sand layer was about 4 to � ft below the garage slab and part this This sand layer may have conveyed the subsurface water that led to the slope failure. During area. removal of the wet soil, the base of the corner post foundation was exposed. The base of th s foundation was founded about 8 Et bolo the is founded on dense eat ve soil and is about 4 fr x 4 l; in size, and in the area against the existing soil garage slab elevation. The contractor continued to place quarry spaats slopes. (• I rettuned to the site at 1520 to observe site condition and progress. At the time of my visit, the By time, spaats had been backfilled to near the cork for the day. this quarry contractor was stoppingriveway to near the base of the concrete Slab inside outside the garagr grade oEthe previous asphalt dand the center of the garage to support the the garage. The contractor had installed a temporary post near - - - - - LANDAU ASSOCIATES - !Cfipr02 ❑tANO✓•U HP�NiVOL 0 TP\5ra0.EC�0e•CJt\tp5\IC1;OI ieC2 lac 1 , • �'S2a 11f 6G03 � !P.YPPU r1SS�Ci11ES IPC IDl18lU? i3:15 P.106�01k - - — beam in this area. Quarry spank had been placed on all sides of the corner post foundation, to an beneath the stem wall foundation on the south side of 4 elevation about 2 fr below he base of the slab and Smart voids could be observed beneath the edge of the northern part of the slab and new, also observed beneath the s.) the garage cracks extended weshvazd from the broken edge of the concrete. Voids were indicate that the voids were present prior to the slope failure. southern edge of the slab, but cobwebs cracks in this area may also ccurred. of existing lhave o � Widening While onsitc, Trod Miller, Terry •lackson, and Brain Moli, and I diz usscd site progress and future site extent of concrete slab removal inside the garage. We also z a , activities. Brian nevi wed the planned discussed the planned pavement section beneath the concrete slab and the asphalt drive to be about 4 car will need to he removed. O A inches of base course. To access the garage slab, the resident's Accordingly, we discussed placing compacted gavel borrow material in a pad to allow die car to be compaction. n m t s ase cours removed. We also discussed the planned placement of additional lilt* Supported center the -garage Hoord beneath the currently supp post, —i -n N Moll also discussed building the foundation preparation e Because of the need to get adequate concrete strength, prep turned (thickened ledge). S fl slab and the for the slab and the center post foundation will occur over the next few days. m pO O R. C m P 1. Visitors: see report ,On m. Unsatisfactory Conditions and Recommended Correction: M r 9 ; rn Attachments: 0 N tii Distribution: city, Evergreen Adjustment Services _ Signed }' CO O m r - LANoAu AssOCIATes 507 rcC2 Jb^ 2 i. is )0118�02 \1r0.NUAU NAINWUL)\OATa\S�MEOOGO]•rt)OS\0 2,15 77f 6403 11?�� fiSSpC:�tES II!C IO;(2J02 ;3:15 P.1C1;81? LANDAU t' { ASSOCIATES FieldReport wxa•nrtul ctata wv lwsxxx aT F Report No.: 3 Project No.: 74 105 Date: 10/16102 hr Client: City of Edmonds 1' Project Name: 75th Place Waterline Break j Q :. Location: Edmonds, near Lake Ballinger I Weather Conditions: sunny, miid •• 1- S Prepared By: D. Ladd =t - O M Dab Ladd was onslte from 0745 to 0e15 and 1255 to 1425 mo �Q _ is pplanned activities and hoeeppa discuss I stopped by in the morning to check in with the eontrlacP t at they The contracor conveyed that the ea ected a backhoe with ho ack to O `C' rn m the planned pavement sections. fir arrive shortly. City crews were working on the waterline (main and service) on 75'" Ave W. During my afternoon visit, The Drew provided me verbal nformation about their observations at the time of theinitial failure and by shutting off water from the subsequent work on Sunday. They reiterated that the leak was controlled be in the service tine, up flow of the meter. I observed that main and that the lute break must somewhere was dry. Accordingly, it appears that the tine break is somewhere m m the soil around the meter connection north of the north side of the house. They also pointed out the location of the'seep' they observed prior to several feet below the existing rn shutting off tfie main asbeing in front of the garage and southeast corner, O O rn asphalt surface. At the time that I arrived for my afternoon visit, the contractor had placed and compacted gravel borrow the remaining driveway. The car had � p -tit f up to near the remaining asphalt surface and in the area south of and the concrete and asphalt had been sawcut. The contractor conveyed be been removed Crum the garage that the soil in the backyard of the lower residence had drained enough so that a vactor truck could not Thursday to remove soil from this area. ef6cimtly used. They planned to bring in u small trackhoe on While I was onsite,'Ceny (Emerald) pointed out some apparently new cracks n the stem wall (grade One crack was near the locution of the cracked concrete slab, S ` beam) on rite Southeast parr of the garage. about 8 ft back from the door. This crack was not visible yesterday and extends upward to a crack n the on the stem wall near n drywall on the garage wall near the window. A second, smaller crack was visible whether the crack existed pr or to the soil failure and this area the back wall of the garage. It is not clear could not be pre�iousty ohsetved because Of items stored in the garage. Terry and I oundaed the need aeout the center post ffoundation and for the structural engineer (Bans Moll) to provide information supporting the stem wall ge ainat I provided Terry with draft plans showing pavement sections, rock slope detail.�f�these drawings stl5 vVc drawings and made small changes. A copy discussed the items showed on the attached to this report. Wh le onsite, Terry and his crew estimated the location of the lower edge of the expose dense silty sand soil rock slope. The area near the base of the rock scope was scraped clean to fill). I discussed the need to embed the lower course of rocks (pOS5jb1C glacial bit or well compacted using the gravel borrow as u bedding layer in wh ch to place the IDCkS. about 12 inches and suggested LANoAu ASSOCIATES � t0e1010i \iIANL'n1i MAIM1iv(ILl\pATP\$NnpCCC(:\0'1At10•\IU1G02 reN ticc 1 1 L€1! 15 P.j881Oil: ; While t was onsitc, Don Piene and Pam Lemeke of the City visited the site. We discussed the planned near the roadway ditch level. . drainage design, including possibly digging a small rock filled storage area Lastly, Don and Pam discussed t s Pam suggested getting some photo s to document the house Dondition. drain system with water to try to clean out some of the debris. P !! flushing the existing foundation ' Visitors: Don Fiene, Pam Lemcke, City of Edmonds , p a t kF Unsat sfactory Conditions and Recommended Correction: none rn Attachments: draft drawings =d RI Distribution: City, Evergreen Adjustment Services C M 1 mo i o a Signed frl M. A t¢; I D— 1 i rv; 'n �• � "I 1M ! ON it i � co� 3} M ar., I i' i rn , Ia " LANDAV ASSOCIATES Z ! 10118102 gLANOAV NAIN1v(1l1\CATA\$NnRECOC\OTC\1nA'01602.rtp3Aoe ^�;^:� ii`t fid09 �k.FfIU 4SSOCikiEs IN"C1�113IC? i3:16 P,On9101d LANDAU ASSOCIATES Ft` Cn�M1'nn<n l 4ee4eM1r'GI5<nien: uG !ai✓ ,_�_ Project Ne..-T-K-L0''� Date � i4(42-Project Z�`�•-•-- By f - Sheet —_ of Subject Date _ Checked By - - a - �W fwiaHt•k 61r. ,\ nD_1v.Lul Z 01 t • I f .... _ .. __._.... ...... .. ... E; [ i� $ i1✓nf fe�AG`yiZ.fN) � T to -1 PP t - -... .j.. - tify}AfNr 1Dr GdG n`9'�G9LE1-ED1W� I .. O 11 ..� OC ([ - -- m 7�-.�'Prfq-L� �P✓JEa/hY.�tE'c7Ya^� Lj Y•7/JAz••• •• t r , J _ A P E•A E•Di Sf GauLtE'_, i __ .. - _ Oy 0 jf 6Mi/Ci. I (p tll..t* : J)i G%11FiVhti!':� �Df%U�.!..• M Iy -, I � 17, 9e.J 11 g ..': .... ... i[SE p �ST>2u G:M�✓F-i� J.)6`i FFit_SI frUR. .Y.t i6 .'MRJJ O: m ,1 : I I ....' I I ;4 I • .. _ ..i I 'Cana •raa;'z� iL��•at.�-c So,4M-s '��C 6�tz eau-o-,�. ! i�,i r�',s', W g F6 • GiGFna ICI�d �a26 i18 6409 LLB[I ME IT°S ING 101i310? 3:16 P.011(01'4 ' 1 F. iMEMOLANDAU ASSOC[ATES, INC. i p-1 ih(1Al^f`-1 • { Er+iiMmrrvil �nO Gnoln cai Scrv, � Vy «D I�I)2Rrolocl -_29 DL4� I Projod No.�_—. Date [�, s S HY — YGt, J h,j Sheet_of^ Subject �— —"- Checked By _.._-- Date _..__ E1C15-t�r.16�.�t+-411l ....". --- ! .a c. Rk I ... \ \• III V, �r mo •'jC ° �Y ' mm m , UtSC HAR �E ` ' ' ' ' '� � Q(D!:• 'tO F.XtS'h ni to ! ... � I .. ;u�i� J...�lJ 1 �!r'SN�•7G:R�1 E { C.LEA�tJ b+T' � _ � --, .. ::. --... i. mm O � !^, - .., • ,lam 1 : j N J pvssard,su�e z `• L/ I bITLN 0PL" E _ - „• m �_ !' � - i _. �n..,,°•_I-�---'--BED lfJ! (o!2ku6L;.lSercU-F'��t, rroR' 3� tr :: ! i I I.-"tJo-.-rianrntei_" a1•v[" ISf+r, I. i •• ^03i517@0$93 !r.4D10 AS50C�tE3 IiIC 1011$i0`t '3:11 P.;12`01( } LANDAU ASSOCIATES ; Field Report ReportNo.: 4 " Project No.: 74 105 J— Date: 10/17/02 Client: City of Edmonds —�— Project Name: 75th Place Waterline Break Location: Edmonds, near Lake Ballinger Z p, h p Weather Conditions: sunny, mild 0 Prepared By: D. Ladd --- ---�— 1 _ { Deb Ladd was onsito from 0935 -1155 and 1450 -1530 fit C " m O i I I stopped by in the morning to observe and document site conditions and visit I spoke with Nod Miller, Lemcke ar d Jim Waite of On C about his planned activities. During my her F the City, Loren McLaughlin (Evergreen Adjustment SazEormed abr of foundationice), he homeowner yara � hthSon-in- M law, Roger, and terry (Emerald Conshaction). P document the COnd lions at the time of my visit. D Z photographs to r_ At the time of my arrival, the contractor is working primarily n sernov removing soil and debr s from the has installed, a portion of the drainpipe along the O downhill residence (23211). The contractor previously the pipe has been bedded in 1 '/= inch minus material- f southwest part of the fill. As recommended Ding my visit I observe City crews attempting to find the sewer cleanout and restoring water service to the City crews found another service connection " the 232L0 residence. While working on the waterline, was stir, live. This connect on was between the 23210 service and the previously found service. The service t ne, about 100 Cr o N that City crew's findings helped to isolate the likely location of the leak to an unused on the slope towards 75a' Place. This m co {north of the 23210 residence. This service line traverses eastward depth on the slope. No signs of leakage or surface erosion were observed Z O j line is buried at an unknown near the pipe location on the slope. During my foundation survey I noted two previously observed foundation crass on the inside wall of the (the one closest to the garage duur) extended to the Z ack I did not vegetat on and see south side of the garage. Only one of these cracks the of the foundation, and the outside crack wwa limhtt d in maner y outside areashysoiml visibility other foundation cracks, but foobser entrance step and landing tilted northward and had in e decking. During my survey, I observed that the north vet',boarDebris in cracks in cracks indicated that this tilting is likely a pre-existing 0 9 started to pull on finish s. condition. continuing work in the backyard of the 23211 residence m . e contractor was During my aftemoor. visit, ththe tracked excavator. The court had also started to prepay soils et the areatnear the t with a small slope. I discussed that the homeowner had noted that the previous slop' p I suggested Etattetring the slope as much as " garage cornea and that a flatter slope would be acceptable. possible the north of the 23210 a levels During my afternoon visit 1 also observed surface soil conditions along pof benches in this area as two I' CeSidcnce, bChveen 75" Place W and 7P Ave W. The slope benchesn a single bench level where the slope height is less (the north p s �� and oa have apparently been used for garden plot: the southern part of this area. The benches nearest the house LANDAU ASSOCIATES " iJr18J21\LnNCAU MAItRVe.IlD4'A15N?REDOGW%nlJ�11 J+]O2 ieW.Aa_ t { � " �325 il@ 6403 GP.0 �S30C IES INN IC118iC? ;3:I1 P.3131'011 t,. at various times. Based on exposed surface sorts, the slope is interpreted to be underlain by silty sand and seepage. The scope appears to! a , gravel, glacial soils. There were no signs of surface erosion or subsurface of cuts and fill, with cuts present at the base of the slope and on Gave been constructed as a combination the th fill. Vegetation the uphill side of midslope benches. The benches are constructed mostly wi the firs. Some tree show signs of includes ferns, brush, grasses, deciduous trees, and larger cedars and u truck ("pistol butting") indicating lonfi terrn Sur moderate curvature at the basebf the soil creep on f ; the slope. No other signs of active slope instability were observed. I The ground surface density varies — some areas are dense and can be probed less than 2 inches with looser and can be probed from 1— p Z, `j moderate pressure on a %z inch steel rod. Other areas are cons The loose soil zones appear to be associated with the fill benches and Oiderable 0,1 2 ftwith moderate pressure. present on the inside edge of the fill benches, indicating heavily vegetated areas. Notably loose zones are. No unusual soil conditions were observed m that the fill benches were not well keyed into the native soil. I along the water service line alignment. The recent waterline leak has not affected the stability of the slope north of the 23210 residence. can lead to slope failure in the future, m O 011 f` I however, it should be noted that the loose fill conditions of very we weather. These potential future failures would be an occurrence that is O C11iy particularly in periods not associated with the water line leak. _ 3 m AZ I. y i Noel Miller,. City of Edmonds. Loren McLaughlin, Evergreen Adjustment Services C (: t, Visitors: t Unsatisfactory Conditions and Recommended Correction: none i% Attachments: sketch of waterline location 0 N bistribution: City, Evergreen Adjustment Services C N m N.. Signed ;0 _. .. Z� 0 m j; I � E.. LANDAU ASSOrlATE3 2 d 1 1WtV0, tLLANDAU MAIN�VOL1f0ATAK11A0.EDefi�; d11a5n01702_rt'M•Cx. �;25 Iit 6403 Ep,SEP.O 2SS0C'ETES iRC i0l18f02 ':3:1P.31iIOI LANDAU i I . ASSCICIMS k' G W,18'✓:2Lta; E' ,�?ZPi?ac Project No. BY ✓ Date r_.!023'roject �.�r' �= 1 _^i� of :Checked By Date Subject Glcfr3'Lhnc�- w� - Sheet ill A ; I �� l -; ! �'' I I I '' (- I �. I• t �- I t _ i I i 1_ I i' a F,IFi_I I' IIII I III-'.• I�—' 1 L�r .'i� �— IJ -'7 37 -1 r,-I I (I; (•t I.I I —l: I I I z I F.— I I�.I I '. I .., (.I I' I I I �I '�, a 1 I. j' I iII� I I lI IiI i I,I � 1_I �.II,I uI .III J II I�..�--, 11 'I II I_I j'7�h'-� il•Iji �lI, 0 m (I_ III I�, 1-n 1 .II I —� I, , I II I� I,�I II mo II, 1,�.1• �II � �'_� ' I��' II I I,�li - �1�1,'lII` 'I �'I 'i10�1Ii� � ( j I I e---�' -ti.I I I I_�.' 1 I � I j � i .!. . I I : I I' , • t L },i_ (� j... I I, I- ram• it �'.1Il om 1��iEl,l�"j-i, L��1 F' I' =1� i i 61 j I II. �l I 1.7 } T.i li:'I'{ -I — I I .ij_ 1 1 mm j Ii� 1 1! I I I I I I ,, 1,.I. I I II I, I ,Lf Il II h r I I 11 . ON I: IH- I rrl roir I .� }I�J .I-- rr;; , j i j I,'.. I' I i .. l-I I ►_,' ' I it,l• ( l� =y m i ,_ II,1 1 i,3II'i — (il ilil Ila ii IIII _III r n, - �� lE�l, I if�(•, I_.I I1II L.'-.•. , I I' {_\, I 1 I l'.. l� `� I• I I ;' I I I( (_ 1 I I. �r I 1 I I..II { ril I i II I ��(FI II II Rry{c'I 1 j..�Ii , rt I- _I '�' 111 'f.) t�1'.I -II4 1!'•_1A N� .III �b'I-1'I'{. Ii I m i.l j '�II': .. 0 j _IcYI F�II:_ ,1 -I�� U �III':� IFj i ' •, I � ' !. .,. I � i.l �_. , I. ..., ; � r ( l � I i I'I I � I. i�I:I I ,. I 1 r'.t ' ( ,..._ I I } ;.I I } � i-. .' I. li 1 I I 1 i I i i I t, 1.....-III, .I .111 ,. li ��I I•--1 ,-II l• 1 I i I I I i8. 0,til V02 j 20 5 7?i fi403 !3:'PGC 2Sa0C dTPS II1C 10,`18102 ;3:12 P.101101{ - LANDAU FAX COVER SHEET Assocv.YcS (Please deliver upon receipt) mc«.rtew i«o ai t' ae t I Gcll� To: From: AC/w-_ /�_ Date: - Company: 77! Da3y Phone No,: �%L? -- ProjectNo.: %N {�� 4 2+T 7V-f 410, j No. of Pages (including this sheet): Fax No.: do not receive allpagos, telophone Immed7ately. , i(Y04 l or he e considere enti.1 and s iinlend.� ed i whom it is atdtlreCdntssed�nShould 'yoa receive this tansmission n erro�a please notify Landau Associates mmediately and destroy fie copy received. jMessage: H11_Yu D i I � L,,,..�✓cc U(�✓ t�Arn..�-iwi � C -dl GEe n.o tam I AQ l� CGt�y HC/rd�YEL .�_. 7�rYtt� o� 7ai1_7>�7033 b425- 77y ozz/ 130 2nd Avenue S. • Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778.0907 • Faz (425) MX409 Block Parcel No WOFILM IIII ATC-2o Rapid Ewduaiion Safety Assessment Form BUILDING DESCRIPTION: OVERAU, RATTING: (Check One) Name: 66RtzeA kFf&f(fi INSPECTED (Green) ❑ _ Exterior only Address: 23 2 f D :: Sy ` 1. Exterior and Interior IDII ED ENTRY (Yellow) Q No. of stories:=tom 41NSAFE (Red) Basement Yes 4 No ❑ Unknown ❑ INSPE Y c C oy Primary Occupancy: Dwelling 13 Inspector Other Residential Q Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Affiliation Industrial Q Public Assembly Q School p INSPECTION DA + Government Q Emer. Serv. Q Historic ❑ Mo/day/year—r Other Time �i_ Instructions: Review structure for the conditions listed below. A "yes" answer to 1, 2, 3, or 5 is grounds for posting entire structure UNSAFE. If more review is needed, post IA4ITTED ENTRY. A `W answer to 4 requires posting AREA UNSAFE and/or barricading around the hazard. Hazards such as a toxic spill or an asbestos release are covered by 6 and are to be posted and/or barricaded to indicate AREA UNSAFE. E,�o�1G�t( e4�r1A55 S71`' More /+r" / : cn3 e 5LK"Oti",,! WOA-4&n W-1 • Review Condition Yes No Needed 1.. Collapse, partial collapse, or building o9foundation ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Building or story noticeably leaning ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Severe racking of walls, obvious severe damage and distress ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Chimney, parapet or other falling hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Severe ground or slope movement present ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Other hazard present ❑ ❑ ❑ Recommendations: Q No further action required Detailed Evaluation required (circle one) tractural eotechnical Other Barricades needed in the following areas: ��, r� .. ,�....� A N'i L. �Ai4, vt� Vt1,t4-�=• s� `Ra'� ��.`.Q _,_- �' . p Other. Pasted at this Assessment: F1 Yes 9KNo jC,-T t; , 714 LY-4 t.,s✓ C" 130 Appendix C A:rcrLu r ATC-20 Detailed Evaluation Safety Assessment Fom:, (Continued) Instructions: Examine the building to determine if any hazardous conditions exist. A "yes" answer in categories 1, 2, or 4 is grounds for posting building UNSAFE. If condition is suspected to be unsafe and more review is needed, check appropriate Unknown box(es) and post 11M]TED ENTRY. Aye? answer in category 3.requires posting and/or barricading to indicate AREA UNSAFE. Explain "Yes", "Unknown° findings and extent of damage under "Comments." Hazardous Condition Exists Condition Yes No Unknown Comments i 1. Structure Hazardous Overall Collapse/partial collapse ❑ ❑ ❑ o ® tiding or story leaning . ❑ ❑ ❑ m ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Hazardous Structural Elements Foundations ❑ ❑ ❑ m a Roof/floors (vertical loads) Columns/pilasters/corbels El ❑ ❑ Elc ❑ ❑ o a o Diaphragms/horizontal bracing ❑ Walls/vertical bracing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o Momentframes Precast connections ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑❑ p Z ❑ O ❑ ❑ n z 3. Nonstructural Hazards I. Parapets/ornamentation ❑ ❑ ❑ o„ � Cladding/glazing Ceilingstigght fixtures ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m m Interior vvalls/partitions Elevators ❑ El ❑ ❑ 0 0 o Stairs/exits tric/gas ❑ ❑OTo ❑ ❑ K N oth — -- ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Geotechnical Hazards Slopefailure/debris ❑ ❑ ❑ z d rnovement, fissures ❑co Other ❑ ❑ ❑ o a SKETCH- . . . . vrJ `3 r�14 Ca�iZ-- . m ifplpi. hrl��l.'t�, � GLSNVk?^J. �'.. ,•! ((jttrrqGY��.Ie :"i7�� j,C�740�% 7ACt 6-i4� ftc-76rceJS' 57rSleeet of l2 G l-i9'C%t✓ tp?ana`x 1�- ATG2o 4 { FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL FORM TO: DATE: MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION FROM: FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE eases�m+ f ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE { Z i 6Z PLANNING DIVISION DATE PILA9CSIGN PROJECT IAIF�,'f✓~k' SERVtc.F _' vt2kL Gt tI VA:—: PA IPg SITE ADDRESS 2-5Z I D r i —4' Pt_ IA. PERMIT ADB# " DATE INSPECTED�Oia_ DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED P�� 5l REMM:2 1 Leh) A field inspection was conducted to determine final compliance with approved plans. Final approval denotes that there are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of PERFORMANCE BONDS and the granting of GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED o Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector I. FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUES o Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inspector I. 2. 3. RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL Date Sign ocaprvl.doc.l:temp:bldg:foims l0/Ol 0 0 m om rno On C mz p 4 cz �co O m mm_ oCO r- r Zn 10 D Z i N O a m i I RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED ... I SETBACKS ..................... .. .. . 3 FOUNDATION: - Footing z a Wall.:.. .. . Pier/Porch .............. n t+ m Retalning Wall ..... Slab Insulation .......... PLUMBING: .. CM - m O .. 9 Underground ............. 1 C) fRough -in ...., ' ... = m Commercial Final .. m . .. HEATING: r{� jI{ Gas Test Gas Piping 1 m, , i i Equipment m p Commercial Final ....... _ . m I EXTERIOR SHEATHING - -..NAILING ....:...:..... mhi i FRAMING .................. ..... :FIRST FLOOR FRAMING.,. i INSULATION ................... _ Z, 'Floor insulation ......... Wail Insulation ........... z.. 0 Ceiling Insulation-....:... i ' .SHEETROCK NAILING ..: n Rt SPECIAL INSPECTION + MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY .................. j I f;