20050627.pdfDATE RECEIVED
CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
7R NAME/NAME OF EILLOiNESS
�j MA!ANG
W
N
C)
CITY
STATE LICENSE
PROPERTY TAX I
NEW
ADDITION
REMODEL
REPAIR
DEMOLISH
GARAGE
CARPORT
16 qq ,
ZIP ITELEPHONE
yax
9.09
ZIP
PARCEL NO.
TELEPHONE
/tl
00
-7'366
?_ . - JLI�
TCBL#
I , i /-,) "'y J, . 1� --
1t)"-D I I PERMIT EXPIRES
PERMIT
NUMBER
JOB SUITEiAPT#
ADDRESS fit <_
<
M� 01-36/
7=ATNAMEiSUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO,
I
LID NO,
LID FEE S
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
rESCP Approved El
RVV Permit Requited
Street Use Pernut Rpquiied
EXISTING PROPOSED
Inspection Required
Sidewalk Requited 13
REQUIRED DEDICATION FT
underground 13
Wined required [3
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO 0 FIXTURES
PRV REQUIRED
YESO NOE3
z
REMARKS
__ I
pit
put
OWNERICONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLdDRAINAGE
z
a
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE
z
uj
NE Fl I E(B) DATE W
5
IA. -71, It /0-5 U.
k4 K M, "Of
EXPIRATIONDATE &ECKEDBY (ARIANCE 01CU !VORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION SEPA
REQ'D COMPLETED I EXEMPT
C3 YES AONC ><1
CA# ZONE SIGN AREA HEIGHT
/%/)!z
6:31d
6() 6> 2
WAIVER)K
STUDY 13
ALLOWED
��L
PROPOSED
ALLOWED
?,�o Cj,
PROPOSED
beu__I�n__e
El
El
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
PLUMBING / MECH
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOS
S;�'ee I '��: q
REO ]RED SETBACKS (FT
FRIONT SIDE REAR
iX0 L 0
PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
FRONT URSIDE REAR
11�p ILL
MULTIFAMILY
SIGN
PARKING
REQ'D PROVIDED
LOTAREA
PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
GRADING CYDS
FENCE
X FT.)
I
REMARKS
TANK
RETAINING WALL
ROCKERY
E]
d2
FIRE SPRINKLER
FIRE ALARM
RACTIVITYIPYON
T PE OF COI`jSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT
y A�5-)-,7 I GROUP
U 07
W I . r -TI-k I
ui NUMBtR BER OF
OF LLING SPECIAL INSPECTION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT
0 STORIES S REQUIRED 13 YES LOA
DESCRIBE WORK70- BE DONE J
lgelvedel exislzt(ei Iz. iwi7-
8
uovii;s. M_ -- S, ja� F _n-1L f I Ag-
GEOTECH REPORT
&04� BY: !AL DESI N
STRUT R
BY: , _X
VALUATION
4 4444 Jr
.0 1
$ 4
&A011zW1 ex 1&htq- Description FEE rDescription FEE
04 S
4f-:3." d- ffa-*tf Me& Plan Check State Surcharge
EAT SgUPJ;E LOT SLOPE% VESTED DATE Building Permit City Surcharge
_f, LP7—i LD
7LAN CHECK NO:
Base Fee
Plumbing 0 f
T COVERS WORK TO Mechanical -a
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS FERMI ZOE—>
A_ BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC
�_E DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE Grading
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 1 9.00.05(A)(5)
Lu
PERMIT LIMIT. SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)
SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Engr. Inspection
*APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit
U) �749_,
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapeinsp. Total Amt. Due
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION. -
Recording Fee Receipt #
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF This application is not a permit until signed by the
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED receipt isacknowledged in space provided
IN VIOLATION 9 FOR INSPECTION
,EjHE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
WORKMEN'SfIDMPG�SATIO��URANCIE AND RCW 18:27.
OFFICIA�S)SIGNATLjqp
N RE GE DATE Sl"ED (425).
771-0220 RELEASED BY
ATTEN-KON EXT. 1333 ec�
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI-
FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 if IBC110 / IRC110. ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR
PINK -OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
10/04 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES
z
0
q
M
-n
M
C
M 0
0
C)
0 C
M
M Z
z
W
o -n
n
_q
x
MM.
0 5)
0 r-
0 M
C W
9 Cn
M C)
Z
;13
X
z
--i
X
C0
z
0
M
CITY COPY
Engineer's Inspection of the Property Located At E D.
RSCEIV 'Page I
7503 212nd Street S.W., Edmonds, Washington
JUK2 2 200.5
June.16, 2005 PERMIT COUNTER
Inspecti*on Report
z
0
INTRODUCTION M
7503 212nd Street S. W., Edmonds, Washillgffill
Q,M
For the exclusive. use of. Pacific Northwest Property C
M
Management, Attention: Mark. Johnson 0
0
Date of Inspection: June 13,2005 X.M
M Z
10
C
Inspecting Engineer: Jack A. Swardz, P.E. z
>
0 _n
a e of a wall
The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate the structural imp ct of th removal M M
ts, to the exte nable amount of time and conditions permit. The initial
between uni nt that a reaso
sentations.or 0 r-
presumption is that all elements are adequate* and proper. Statements,* repre 0 M
nce which, in C Cn
conclusions to the contrary are made only when the inspecting engineer sees evide 9 Ch
his judgment, indicates the existence of significant deficiencies. The inspection is visual only M 0
Z
and does not involve the opening or exposure of elements concealed from,view.
Wherever a deficiency of any kind is identified in this report, there is always a possibility that it.
is associated with a larger, more serious, more extensive or more pervasive problem that is z
is beyond the scope of this inspection. Consequently, you should take
hidden from view or
s ified
-whatever action is*necessary to ensure that the full extent and implication of ident
deficiencies are known. 0
To fully understand the importance of any deficiency, you should obtain bids for its correction. M
Bids for repairs vary widely, with high bids sometimes being five toten times the amount of low
bids for the same work. You should always obtain at least three competitive bids.
Certain limitations apply to any inspection, including those diligently performed by a qualified
expert. The limitations on this inspection include any noted in the body of the report together
0 e end of the report. We consider these
with those listed under "Limitations n Inspections" at th.
limitations unavoidable. If you make any use of the information contained in this report, it is
E LIMITATIONS ARE
necessary that you u s. IF THES
nderstand and accept these limitation
UN . ACCEPTABLE TO YOU, YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE INFORMATION IN THIS
REPORT FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER.
Engineer's Inspection of the Property Located At
7503 212nd Street S.W., Edmonds, Washington. Page 2
EVALUATIONS
A wall between units has recently been removed to combine two apartment units into..one living
unit. This modification is common for both buildings B & C, no modification where made to
building A. I inspected the property on November 17, 2004 and evaluated the wall to be a non
bearing element of the building. Now that the structures have been further completed, my
z
0
original assumptions are confirmed. The remove d walls have not impacted the overall integrity
.0
of the building structure.
M
LIMITATIONS ON INSPECTIONS
C M
The limitations on this inspection include those discussed throughout the report, together with
M 0�
those listed in the following paragraphs.
0
Q,
ACCESSIBILITY OF DEFICIENCIES: Statements, representations, o r conclusions offered by
X M
M z
the engineer who conducts the inspection and/or by Northwest Inspection Engineers, Inc. are.
'inspected.
based solely upon a* isual examination of the exposed areas of the structure Hidden
v
defects could have a significant impact on the visually based conclusions, statements, and
Cn
representations made by the inspector.
0 n
NO WARRANTY: All statements, representations, or conclusions offered by the inspecting
M
M M
engineer are the considered opinion of the inspecting engineer arising from the limited inspection
described herein. These statements, representations, or conclusions do not constitute an express
M
C CO)
or. implied warranty of any kind.
Cn.
Mo
z
'WAS
M,
!Me
z
z
.0
At
M
FINA--..j. PROJECT APPROVAL F,,,RM
TO.
DATE:
MEMO TO: PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION
FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE
FROM:
AISH SIGN
ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE
PLEASESIGN
0
PLANNING DIVISION DATE
PLEASESIGN
PROJECT (3
'7eD& Z17j* 15-1 L -41S i (�,90 2-
gg-
M 00
SITE ADDRESS
C
4X6 -0 (OXI, Ze, LqADB# INSPECTED
M
M z
PERMIT __=:�:�DATE
r -51, -�2 -0-
30) L
91 MAU
>
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTED
Cft
A field inspection was conducted to determine compliance with -approved plans. Final approval
0
_n
denotes that there: are no objections from the above signed Department to the release of
M.
PERFORMANCE BONDS and the gran ting of
m
0
0 r
Cn
CD
GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL.
M 0
Zr_
X
GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTED
0 Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor by inspector
0
FAILED FINAL INSPECTION OUTSTANDING ISSUES
0 Copy of CORRECTION NOTICE given to owner/contractor by inpector
2.
3.
RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSUES'GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL
Date Signature
1:tcnip:b1dg:fom1s:ocaprv1 3/25/04