20061048 Bank of WA _2_.pdf
City of Edmonds
TH
121 5 AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 FAX(425) 771-0221
Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning Building Engineering
Plan Review Corrections
Application : Date:
# bld20061048 May 21, 2007
th
Project Name/Address:
Bank of Washington / 202 5 Ave S
Contact Person/Address/Fax:
Mike Perry, Dimensions / e-mail: mperry@dimensionsarch.com
Reviewer: Jeanie McConnellDivision:Engineering
During review of the subject submittal it was found that the following information, corrections, or
clarifications will need to be addressed:
GENERAL
1.Engineering Division handouts and standard details are available on the Citys website at
www.ci.edmonds.wa.us, under the Development Services Department, Engineering Division. Pertinent
standard details should be incorporated into the plan set.
2.12/14/06, previous comment: Please provide correspondence from Community Transit with regards to the
existing bus stop, their approval to keep the stop in this location upon construction completion and a
potential temporary bus stop during the course of construction.
5/21/07
A copy of an e-mail from CT was provided with the reponse. Please add a note to the plans
o
consistent with CTs response as well as CT contact info. It would be appropriate to show this
information on the traffic control plan.
3.12/14/06, previous comment: Provide a traffic control plan.
th
Three separate layouts will be required for work on Dayton, 5 and the Alley.
·
Sidewalk closures and re-directing of pedestrian travel is to be shown on this plan.
·
If there is to be a temporary bus stop, it shall be shown.
·
5/21/07
Response acknowledges comment. TCP has not yet been received.
o
4.Provide a Haul Route plan.
5/21/07
Response acknowledges comment. Haul route plan has not yet been received.
o
5.ok
6.12/14/06, previous comment: Previous corrections have been sent regarding the Traffic Impact Analysis
and the sizing of the dumpster. Please also provide response to these items.
5/21/07
Trash Enclosure has not been labeled on the site improvement plan. Also, details of the trash
o
enclosure need to be provided with the civil plans.
DATE E-MAILED 5/21/07 PAGE 1 of 6
5/21/07
Traffic Impact Analysis has been received. The City does not currently have a traffic engineer
o
so the submittal is being reviewed by a consultant. Any comments regarding the submittal will follow
these corrections.
7.ok
8.see C-1 comment #9.
9.12/14/06, previous comment: Provide an itemized estimate for both on-site and off-site (right-of-way)
improvements, including traffic control.
5/21/07
Please revise cost estimate as follows:
o
a.Revise curb/gutter demo/disposal LF. Only states 60lf. There is approx. 53 lf along Dayton
Street alone.
th
b.Sawcut asphalt, 3 depth revise to be consistent with replacement along Dayton Street and 5
Ave.
c.Revise LF for replacement of c/g.
th
d.Revise SY of sidewalk as required to include replacement along 5 Ave frontage as well as
Dayton Street.
e.Additional cost required for ADA ramps.
f.Additional cost required to paint curb yellow.
th
g.Additional cost required to remove asphalt strip in existing walk along 5 Ave.
h.Revise quanitity of CB Type 1 to include 1 in ROW.
i.Revise storm pipe material to include 34lf of 6 DIP.
j.Remove cost for concrete driveway and add in additional cost for asphalt approaches.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
5/21/07
1. - A tree grate shown at the SE corner of the project is in conflict with the ADA ramp. This tree
grate has not been shown on the civils. Also, the tree grate proposed near the entrance off Dayton Street
may be in conflict. Please confirm clearances and revise plans accordingly. See also, comment #9 of C-2.
5/21/07
2. The size of the trash enclosure is not accurately shown on this plan. Please revise.
A0.0 Cover Sheet
1. ok
A1.0 Site Plan
1.12/14/06, previous comment: Some information provided on this site plan should be on the Civil site
improvement plan to provide direction on construction of the improvements. Please revise accordingly.
5/21/07
Utility info not pertinent to this plan sheet (i.e. not used for height calcs, etc.) shall be
o
removed. The civil set shows revisions to the utility systems that are not reflected on this sheet.
2.ok
3.ok
4.ok
A4.1 - Sections
1. ok
DATE E-MAILED 5/21/07 PAGE 2 of 6
DRAINAGE CALCS
1.-
2.12/14/06, previous comment: See Note #4 under Grading and Drainage. Storm water quality is to be
provided.
5/21/07
Response states wet vault depth was increased to include 3 of additional wet pool. This does
o
not adequately address water quality requirements for the project. Need to provide stormwater quality
treatment for the parking and driving surfaces. The stormwater quality treatment needed is for the
control of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. The 4 feet of dead storage in the vault will help with sediment
loading but not for the treatment of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Use a BMP from the DOE Stormwater
Management Manual that will be suitable for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the amount likely to be seen at
high-use site
a such as this. Some examples of potential oil control options include facilities such as an
API-Type Oil/Water Separator, Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separator, or a sand filter system
3.ok
C-1 TESC AND DEMOLITION PLAN
1.ok
2.12/14/06, previous comment: Place traffic control notations on a separate civil sheet.
5/21/07
Response states sidewalk closed ahead notation removed. This notation is still shown on this
o
plan sheet. Please remove.
3.12/14/06, previous comment: Filter socks shall be placed in all catch basins within the vicinity the project
and any other affected downstream CBs. Plans currently only call out for socks in Existing CBs #1 and #2
in the alley.
5/21/07
Response states notes have been revised to reference Typ details. Change has not been
o
made.
4.ok
5.12/14/06, previous comment: Revise filter fence note to state per detail # ___/ C-4. It currently states
this sheet.
5/21/07
Comment not addressed.
o
6.12/14/06, previous comment: Revise construction entrance note to state per detail # ___/ C-4. It currently
states this sheet.
5/21/07
Comment not addressed.
o
7.12/14/06, previous comment: Underground access lids (typical) are shown on this plan. What is to happen
with these access lids?
5/21/07
Response states they have been removed, but they are still showing on the plan sheet. Plans
o
now call out as Montioring Well Access Lids. Note as TR per note on sheet C-2.
8.12/14/06, previous comment: Show location of job shack, job site fencing, staging area and construction
parking.
5/21/07
Comment not addressed.
o
9.12/14/06, previous comment: Clearly identify areas of disruption to the City sidewalk and parking area.
Please indicate the number of months in which these areas will be disrupted. Additional disruption fees will
th
apply for closure of more than 72 hours. Please keep in mind that pedestrian travel along 5 Ave will need
to be maintained.
12/14/06 (Previous General comment #8) - Provide a cross section of the building, footings, footing
th
drains and shoring along 5 Ave and Dayton Street. Additional permits and approvals will be required
DATE E-MAILED 5/21/07 PAGE 3 of 6
for this work to take place in the City right-of-way. Show required cuts on the grading plan, or a
supplement to the grading plan.
5/21/07
- Response states no shoring is required. The grading plan C-2 notes that excavation extends 12
o
outside face of wall, max depth below existing grade is less than 3 feet. The sidewalk will be disrupted.
Limits of disruption and duration of disruption not noted. Traffic control/pedestrian re-route will be
required accordingly and shall be shown separately on the traffic control plan.
5/21/07
10. Note asphalt strip as TBR
C-2 GRADING, DRAINAGE & CIVIL SITE PLAN
** These comments were previously noted under Civil Site Improvement Plan not provided.
1.ok
2.12/14/06, previous comment: Please note the requirement to replace the existing driveway approaches with
standard curb, gutter and sidewalk per City standard detail E2.13.
5/21/07
- Requirement to be called out on site improvement plan, consistent with other such notes.
o
Currently is provided on Sheet C-3, Utility Plan and Parking Lot Striping Plan.
3.12/14/06, previous comment: Please revise the note to replace curb and gutter as determined by the City
inspector to include replacement of the sidewalk. Also, please note the entire curb/gutter and sidewalk
section on Dayton Street will need to be removed and replaced.
5/21/07
Sheet C-2 revised, thank you. Please remove note from C-3 that states Ex. Sidewalk See Note.
o
There are no notes on C-3 pertaining to this requirement.
5/21/07
Reference City standard detail E2.8 for new curb/gutter.
o
5/21/07
After further review of this area removal of existing driveways, removal of existing asphalt
o
strip, installation of tree grates as well as the need to disturb the sidewalk to construct footings, it is
th
apparent that the entire sidewalk along the frontage of 5 Ave will need to be replaced.
4.-
5.12/14/06, previous comment: The two new driveway approaches shall be constructed per City standard
detail E2.27. This detail requires the entrance to have radii and a high capacity gutter.
5/21/07
- Detail referenced and radii added, thank you. Plan sheets still shown a concrete approach.
o
Please revise.
6.ok
7.ok, Encroachment Permit submitted.
8.see C-2 (continued) comment #9
9.12/14/06, previous comment: Please provide a cross section of the south entry tower, the sidewalk and bus
sign. A minimum 44 clear zone is to be maintained.
5/21/07
Response states by others. A cross section has not been provided.
o
10.ok
11.ok
12.ok
13.ok
14.ok
15.ok, plans revised.
DATE E-MAILED 5/21/07 PAGE 4 of 6
C-2 GRADING, DRAINAGE & CIVIL SITE PLAN (continued)
1.Verify invert elevations and direction of flow for existing and proposed storm pipe.
Ex. CB #2
Is North IE correct? The elevation is less than that of the south IE of Exist. CB #1, which would
·
indicate flow toward the south not north.
5/21/07
Response states its correct, flows go to the North. However, using the inverts
o
provided the existing storm pipe between Ex. CB #1 and Ex. CB #2 would constantly be holding
water. If the information provided is accurate, then this section of storm pipe will need to be
removed and replaced, raising the north i.e. at CB #2 to ensure proper flows to the north. Please
revise the plans accordingly.
5/21/07
- Please also provide inverts at the Type 1 CB at Dayton Street and the alley so the total
o
flow of the system can be reviewed and proper elevations established for the run of pipe between
Ex. CB #1 and Ex. CB #2.
2.ok
3.12/14/06, previous comment:Show the location of the footing drains and the location in which they outfall.
The footing drains cannot be connected to the storm detention system.
5/21/07
Response states no footing drains are proposed. However, the roof runoff collector detail on
o
Sheet C-5 shows footing drains. Please revise accordingly.
4.-
5.ok
6.ok
7.ok
8.
9.12/14/06, previous C-2 comment: Show street tree locations and placement of grates in the sidewalk.
Ensure there is no conflict between the location of the trees and the awnings.
5/21/07
Show required ramps at driveways. One ramp is currently shown with a note typical.
o
Showing all ramps will help determine and avoid potential conflicts. A tree grate shown on the
landscape plan at the SE corner of the project that is in conflict with the ADA ramp. This tree grate has
not been shown on the civils. Also, the tree grate proposed near the entrance off Dayton Street may be
in conflict. Please confirm clearances and revise plans accordingly. See also, comment #1 - Landscape
Plan.
5/21/07
10. Revise note Paint curbing at sides of: EXIT change to ENTRANCE on Dayton Street.
5/21/07
11. Note Wheel Chair Ramp and Street Lamp as TR
5/21/07
12. Please add a note: DO NOT DISTURB CROSSWALK PAVERS
5/21/07
13. CB#5 is being added as well as a new run of pipe from this CB to the existing CB to the north.
Slope of pipe is indicated to be .5%. Revise South 6 inv. at existing CB to be consistent with slope of new
pipe.
5/21/07
14. NEW CB #3 states curb inlet, but rim to inverts indicate a Type 1 would be required. Please
revise.
C-3 STRIPING AND UTILITY PLANS
1.ok
2.ok
3.12/14/06, previous comment: An RPBA is required on the domestic water service line, immediately after the
meter on private property, in a hot box.
5/21/07
RPBA has been shown inside the building. Please revise.
o
DATE E-MAILED 5/21/07 PAGE 5 of 6
4.ok
5.ok
6.ok
7.Show the location of the 6 sewer lateral from the main to the property line and the 6 side sewer from the
property line to the building.
12/14/06, previous comment: Indicate pipe material, slope and provide invert elevations.
·
5/21/07
Response states invert to be determined at construction. As shown, there are two existing
o
cleanouts in the parking lot that should allow for access to obtain pretty good estimates on depth of the
lateral. A more complete design now will prevent delays during construction.
8.ok
5/21/07
9. Remove or grey out notes that are pertinent to C-2, such as: Replace Ex. Driveways, new
driveway, etc. on both the utility plan and the striping plan.
5/21/07
10. Information provided on the striping plan is not consistent with the striping noted on A1.0.
Ensure all required striping and signage is shown on this plan. If youd rather, you can simply incorporate a
copy of A1.0 into the civil set and note as striping plan.
NEW C-5 (old C-4) DETAILS
1.12/14/06, previous comment:Incorporate City of Edmonds standard details as required by comments above.
rd
5/21/07
Response states 3 time. Not sure what that means. Detail E1.3 is not the current standard
o
detail for catch basin protection. Please revise. Also, E2.27-High traffic load driveway access has not
been included on this sheet.
2.ok
3.-
4.ok
5.ok
NEW C-6 (old C-5) SPECIFICATIONS
12/14/06 comments addressed, thank you.
Please resubmit 3 copies of the revised plans/documents to a Development Services Coordinator. Marie
Harrison is your City contact for this project. Please contact me at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at
mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections.
DATE E-MAILED 5/21/07 PAGE 6 of 6