20080204152516.pdfof EDO City of Edmonds
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
�Sr. ts9° (425) 771-0220
DATE: February 4, 2008
TO: Terri (Murphy) Gietzen and Daniel Gietzen
murphyts@comcast.net
FROM: Jenny Readwin, Plans Ex ine
RE: Plan Check # 2007-1022
Project: New SFR
Project Address: 8715 Talbot Rd.
During review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information,
corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit two (2) sets of revised
plans/documents (affected sheets only) with a written response to each of the items below to a
Permit Coordinator.
1) Please add the following information to the site plan.
2/4/08 Still Need. Now this is considered a new single family residence rather than a 2nd
story addition. Please change labels on the site plan accordingly.
■ 2/4/08 Still need. Show all landings and parches (i.e. garage man door, laundry room door
and family room French doors.)
You may redline plans or resubmit three (3) new site plans scaled no smaller than 1 "-20' and
one on paper no larger than 8 %2" x 14".
2) ok
3) ok
4) ok
5) 2/4/08 See attached additional structural comments. See attached structural comments from
city consultant. Respond to each item in writing.
Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers, P.S.
PO Box 523
Olalla, WA 98359
hoytjeter@centurytel. net
360 874 0562
Fax 360 874 0591
To: Theresa Umbaugh
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Gietzen Residence
8715 Talbot Rd
Edmonds, WA, WA 98020
Plan Review # 2007-1022
PIan review number 01
Structure
Area S.F.
Main floor
2615
Second floor
2015
otaI
4630
Garage
723
Total
5353
Deck Second floor
98
Porch
46
Grand total
5497
EECE # EDM 08-06
The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with
Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. The following comments,
deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and
subsequent issuance of permits.
Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items
listed below to facilitate a shorter back -check time.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
The scope of this review is for the Structural requirements of this project.
All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All
portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements,
conditions and concerns before permit approval.
STRUCURAL COMMENTS
Sheet S2 Main Floor Framing
Page 2of3
Plan Review Number 01
EECE#: EDM 08-06
Gietzen Residence
2007-1022
Engineer of Record (EOR), please submit analysis for the continuous spread
footing to support the reaction from the post bearing at the edge. For example the
new 4x 10 beam at the family room. Based off the reactions and the load applied at
the edge it appear the footing will not support this force. Please submit analysis to
justify or increase the size of this footing similar to detail 3. TBC 1805.4.1
2. EOR, please submit analysis for the continuous spread footing to support the
reaction from the post bearing at the edge supporting the new double joist under
wall. Based off the reactions and the load applied at the edge it appear the footing
will not support this force. Please submit analysis to justify or increase the size of
this footing similar to detail 3. IBC 1805.4.1
3. EOR, please clarify if the all the existing beams along the line where there is a note
noting "double joist minimum contractor to verify" are 2x10s. I assumed this was
the case but it is not clear. Based off the reactions, unless the (2) 2x are connected
it appears it will not support the design loads. Please add a detail at this location to
show what is built here so the contractor and inspector will be able to verify what
is required. This is the wall line that supports the interior recreations room wall.
Sheet S3 Second Floor Framing
4. EOR, please provide detail for the deck over the living space for how the joist will
be sloped. The joists are bearing on a beam on one side and a wall on the other
side. Please clarify how this will be built in order to meet the sloped note on the
drawings. Also please specify the required slope that will be built. This is
important to assure the deck joists are not over cut. Please add a detail at this
location or clarify how this will be constructed.
5. EOR, please provide a detail for the 4x10 down to the supporting post. There is a
1-3/4X11-7/8 beam framing in one direction and the other directions there is a 9-
1/2X 11-7/8 PSL flush. There also perpendicular to the column is a 4x10 down.
Please add a detail at this location for the complete load path. It was not clear how
these members will be connected.
6. EOR, please specify the required anchorage of the truss to the supporting
structures. The IBC required the register design professional to specify this. IBC
2303.4.1.6
7. EOR please provide a detail at the 11-718" T.II 230 joist connecting to the interior
shear walls SWL The drawings note IUS2.37/11.88 to be used. In order to use this
hanger there must be blocking member added at these locations so the hanger will
be able to be installed correctly. Plywood will not support this load.
Page 3 of 3
Plan Review Number 41
EECE#: EDM 08-06
Gietzen Residence
2007-1022
8. EOR, please specify the required 5-118X1.5 GLB connection to the multiple studs
support. All beams to post connections shall have positive connections. Please
clarify how this will be connected on the drawings. I was unable to determine this
from the drawings.
9. EOR, please specify the required hanger to support the roof 2x 12 rafters at the
wall. Details 3/S3 state hanger per framing plan, but the framing plan only notes
the 11-7/8 TJI 230 joist. Please clarify where this is noted or add to the drawings.
Sheet S4 Roof Plan
10. EOR, please specify the required anchorage of the girder truss to the supporting
structures. The IBC required the register design professional to specify this. IBC
2303.4.1.6
11. EOR, design analysis for the RH7 state shear stress to be 201 psi. Please clarify
how the 6X8 DF#2 allowable stress will not exceed this. The shear may be taken d
from the support. So if the reaction is with d of the support this may be ignored for
calculating the shear stress. Please clearly dimension the location of the Girder
truss on the drawings to assure this reaction will be with -in this limit or modify the
member to not exceed the allowable shear stress. NDS 3.4.2
Additional corrections may be required following receipt of corrections and additional
information as requested.
Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Fire
Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes, clarifications
or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building Department plan
review when comments are received from the other concerned departments.
Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please contact Hoyt Jeter at (360) 874-
0562 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Hoyt Jeter, P.E.
President