Loading...
20080905104822.pdfor EDS City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: September 5, 2005 TO: Kristin Hanson e-mail: hansondesign@hotmail.com FROM: Ann Bullis, Building Official [�j--� RE: Plan Check: 2005-0593 Project: Johnson SFR Project Address: 16117 7e Place W During review of the plans for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to where the changes can be found on the plans, and submit revised plans/documents to a Permit Coordinator. 1. Retaining walls/shoring and grading work on adjacent property: a. Construction easement from adjacent property owner required for temporary shoring and grading less than 50 cubic yards. b. Separate permits are required for permanent retaining/shoring walls and grading of 50 cubic yards or more. Submit permit applications signed by the adjacent property owner(s). 2. Special Inspections are required by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Complete the enclosed Special Inspection and Testing Agreement, have the owner, general contractor and geotechnical engineer sign the agreement and return for City approval prior to permit issuance. 3. Revise water heater notes for fuel gas to note that all combustion air must be provided from the outside (louver door not permitted). Will water heater be direct vent? Show how combustion air will be provided (TRC Chapter 17). See attached consultant comments LANDAU ASSOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM MRANDUM �nwrrorr��{w�G�or�csir�iu�rwurr�a_xaurcrs TO: Ann Bullis, Building Official City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Building. Division AUG FROM: Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. l5 2098 DATE: August 14, 2008 UrL. j jV RE: GEOTECHNICAL PEER REVIEW FoR EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA. SUBMITTAL PACKAGE — BUILDING PERMIT No. BLD20080593 JOHNSON SFR -16117 74"' PLACE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON This technical memorandum provides our :geotechnical peer review of portions of the permit package submitted to the. City of Edmonds (City) for. the proposed referenced development within the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA) of North Edmonds_ The purpose of this geotechnical peer review was to review portions of the submittal package and assess its compliance with City development and building permit requirements as contained in Edmonds Community Development. Code (ECDC) Chapters 19.10 and 23.80. This geotechnical peer review was accomplished in accordance with Task Order No, 08-14 of Landau Associates' On -Call Geotechnical Engineering Services Agreement with the City. Landau Associates had previously conducted two completeness reviews of the submittal package, and the results of those completeness reviews are contained in Technical Memoranda dated April 11, 2008 and July 11, 2008. We have received the following .informatiot3 forwarded by the City for review: • ;Report of Geotechnical Services, Proposed Single -Family Residence; .Lor-ian Woods Plat, Lot 9, Edmonds, Washington report prepared for Mx. Steve Johnson by Zipper Zeman Associates, .Inc., dated May 30� 2008: m Geotechnical Plan Review, Proposed Single -Fancily Residence, 16117 74r1' PlaceWest, Lorian FTToods Plat, Lot 9, Edmonds,. Washington letter prepared for Steve Johnson by ZZA-Terracon, dated May 30; 2008. • Temporary Ecology Block Gravity Shoring Wall Figures & Calculations prepared for Mr. Steve Johnson by ZZA-Terracon, dated May 30, 2008. • Viciniot Map- Johnson 16117 74x1' PI West, author unknown, undated (stamped received by Building Dept July 1, 2008). • Excavation Plan for Johnson, 16117 74"' Place West, Edmonds 98026, prepared by Ken .Davis, Ken Davis Backhoe, undated (stamped received by Building Dept. July I, 2008). • Memo: — .Response to Completeness Review Mento of April 11, 2008, prepared by Kristin Hanson; dated July 1, 2008. 1.30 2nd Avenue South a Edmonds, WA 96020 a (425).7.78-0907 9 fax -(425) 778-6409 a Www.Eandauinc.com • Plat Survey for Stephen C. Johnson, prepared by Greene Land Surveying, dated September 27, 2007. • Site Plan —Johnson 16117 74'" Place West, revised July 15, 2008. • Drawings — Johnson 16.117 7e Place West, Sheets 2 through 14, dated July 15, 2008. • Structural Drawings for Johnson Residence, Sheet SI through S6, prepared by Baker Engineers, Inc., P. S., dated June 12, 2008. • Calculation Sheets 35 through 40, L8, L9, and L13, prepared for Johnson Residence by Baker Engineers, Inc., P.S., various dates (stamped resub July 15, 2008 by Building Dept.). • Grading & TESC (Sheet 1) and Road & Drainage Plan (Sheet 2) for Steve and Joan Johnson, prepared by Donna L. Breske, P.E., dated March 13, 2008. • Map of Lorian Woods Planned Residential Development, page 1 of 2 (with Lot 9 marked), prepared by Dowl Engineers, undated. • North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas Map (with property location noted) and signed certification as to property location, by Kristin Hanson, dated March 27, 2008. The following sections provide our review comments. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT The geotechnical report prepared by Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA), dated May 30, 2008 provides a reasonably comprehensive evaluation and discussion of site conditions and risks, and provides geotechnical recommendations for design. In our opinion, the geotechnical report adequately addresses the requirements contained in ECDC 19.10 and 23.80 related to projects in the North Edmonds ESLHA. A significant temporary cut is planned in landslide debris. It will be critical that the stability of this cut be monitored by the contractor and the geotechnical engineer, and the work be accomplished in consideration of site conditions disclosed during construction, weather, duration the cut is open, and other factors to limit the risk to upslope property. Geotechnical monitoring and inspection of earthwork by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record is required, including placement and compaction of structural fill, foundation bearing, temporary shoring, retaining walls, and retaining wall backfill and drainage. The plans should note this requirement. 8114108 N%Edmdata5projects107411494FileRcorrkR%GeotPeerRevAew_tn.doc LANDAU AsSOMATES 2 TEMPORARY ECOLOGY BLOCK GRAVITY SHORING WALL ZZA-Terracon has prepared two figures with supporting calculations for temporary ecology block gravity shoring walls. We recommend that these figures and the accompanying notes on Figures I and 2 be incorporated into the construction drawings. In accordance with the ZZA-Terracon review letter dated May 30, 2008, we assume that the ecology block walls surrounding the lower level will not be removed, but will be left in place and backfilled. We recommend that a note be added to the Figures to reflect that condition. Temporary excavations and ecology block walls are shown extending beyond the Lot 9 property boundaries into adjacent "Common Areas." We recommend temporary construction easements or other documentation be obtained that grants approval to extend temporary excavations and ecology block walls into the adjacent Common Area. ZZA-Terracon recommends in their May 30, 2008 review letter that the plan set include an excavation plan that includes the excavation sequence and layout of cut slopes and temporary shoring walls. Davis Backhoe has submitted an undated, written "Excavation Plan" that outlines a general sequence of construction. We are concerned that project information and requirements regarding this critical temporary cut is scattered between the ZZA-Terracon temporary wall design figures, the ZZA-Terracon review letter, the Davis Backhoe Excavation Plan, and other plans and documents. We recommend that the ZZA-Terracon temporary shoring wall design, the Excavation Plan, and all related requirements regarding the temporary cut and shoring be integrated and combined into one plan sheet document for purposes of construction. ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS ZZA-Terracon has reviewed the project architectural and structural plans and has concluded in a May 30, 2008 review letter that they appear to be in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations in their updated May 30, 2008 report, with some specific exceptions noted. The May 30, 2008 ZZA-Terracon review letter presents 11 bulleted items that need to be addressed. We have reviewed these items and concur with ZZA-Terracon's recommendations. The 10"' bulleted item in the ZZA-Terracon review letter relates to uplift forces on the stormwater detention system and appears to have been addressed in calculations provided by Donna Breske. However, none of the other listed items appear to have been addressed in the architectural or structural plans that were submitted for our review. We recommend that the recommended revisions or additions to the plans as contained in the bulleted list of the ZZA-Terracon letter be addressed by the design team and incorporated into the final drawings. The structure will be built on three levels stepped up the slope with retaining walls. It appears that the upper retaining wall is in relatively close proximity to the lower wall. City of Edmonds Retaining 8/14/OB 11EdrMataVrojects107411494FIIeRooniRlGeotPeerReWew tm.doe LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3 Wall Requirements (Handout B62), as well as conventional engineering practice, requires that if the horizontal distance between the upper and lower walls is less than the height of the lower wall, then the lower wall will be required to support a surcharge load from the upper wall. It is not clear from the information available to us whether the lower wall has been designed for this additional surcharge requirement. We recommend that the structural engineer confirm that the lower wall has been designed to accommodate surcharge loading from the upper retaining wall. CIVIL PLANS The civil plans show a rockery wall or block wall on each side of the driveway. Rockery walls are not permitted in the North Edmonds ESLHA and the callout and detail for a rockery wall should be removed. The civil plans show a detail for a block wall ranging from 2 to 4 ft in height. However, the waII on the north side of the driveway appears to be as high as 5 ft. A written response to the Geotechnical Completeness Review Tech Memo of April 11, 2008 from Kristin Hanson, dated July 1, 2008, states that the rockery(s) shown on the civil plan will be concrete walls per the structural engineer. The civil plans should be revised to show the concrete retaining walls now planned for the area adjacent to the driveway. A retaining wall is also shown adjacent to the asphalt -paved driveway adjacent to the entrance porch near the southeast corner of the house. A note on the plans states that this will be an "Engineered Retaining Wall (By Geotee)." No plans for this wall are included in the materials provided for our review. The type of retaining wall and the details need to be addressed in either the civil or structural plans. Inspection, maintenance, and regular reporting of TESC measures by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record are required [see the City of Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Requirements]. The pre -construction meeting needs to include the Geotechnical Engineer of Record [see City of Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Requirements]. These requirements should be noted on the Grading and TESC sheet and the owner or lead design professional should arrange for these services with the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The City requires that earthwork during the winter season between October 1 and April 30 be restricted. We recommend that the TESC and Grading plans specifically indicate that earthwork is restricted between October 1 and April 30 and any earthwork in this time period requires approval from both the Geotechnical Engineer of Record and the City Building Official. 8l1410 15Edmdatalprojects507411494FileRoontRIGeotPeerReview_tm.doc LANDAu ASSOCIATES 4 REQUIRED STATEMENTS AND DECLARATIONS We reviewed the submittal package to confirm that the statements and declarations as required by the City for development within the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area have been addressed and our findings are summarized below: • ZZA-Terracon has provided a Geotechnical Hazard Identification/Declaration and Mitigation Statement of Risk in their letter dated May 30, 2008, as required by the City. • Statements from other design professionals were not included in the package that we were provided to review. We assume that the City is confirming that the other required statements and declarations have been submitted and are in order. This technical memorandum has been prepared for the exclusive use by the City of Edmonds in evaluating the adequacy of permit submittal documents related to the proposed Johnson single family residence at 16117 74ffi Place West. The focus of this review was the geotechnical aspects of the application. The purpose of the review was to assess the adequacy of the application documents for compliance with City requirements contained in ECDC 23.80 and ECDC 19.10 and conformance with conventionally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This geotechnical peer review by Landau Associates does not lessen the requirements for the applicant's geotechnical consultant and other design professionals to prepare an appropriate design for the site conditions. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. DRS/rgm 5114108 HEdmdata5projects107411495FileRoorriR\Geot?eerReview_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 5 Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers, P.S. PO Box 523 Olalla, WA 98359 hoytieter@centurytel.net 360 874 0562 Fax 360 874 0591 To: Marie Harrison 121 5`h Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Johnson Residence 16117 74h Ave W Edmonds, WA 98020 Plan Review # 2008-0593 EECE # EDM 08-76 Plan review number 01 Structure Stated Area S.F. Main Floor 2131 Upper floor 2807 Total 4935 Garage 1845 Total 6783 Deck first floor 580 Porch 128 Grand total 7491 The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. The following comments, deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and subsequent issuance of permits. Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items Iisted below to facilitate a shorter back -check time. SCOPE OF REVIEW The scope of this review is for the Structural, Ordinance, V&IAQC, Energy requirements of this project. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. Page 2 of 6 Plan Review Number 01 EECE#: EDM 08-76 Johnson Residence 2008-0593 ORDINANCE COMMENTS General 1. Please note, sprinklers are required for this structure. Based on the stated square footage it appears a NFPA 13D is required. This was confirmed with the City Fire Marshall. Sheet 13 North and West Elevations 2. The line of soil is not to be disturbed cross the property line. Please submit either easement or letter from the geotechnical engineer that this construction will not effect the easement or the property line. The information provided by the geotechnical engineers has not stated this at this time. Sheet 2 Lower Floor Plan 3. Please specify the required. light activation at the bottom of the stairs, per R303.6.1 4. Please specify that all the penetrations through the garage to house separation wall shall be protected by filling the opening around the penetrating item with approved material to resist the free passage of flame and products of combustion. R309.1.2 Sheet 3 Upper Floor Foundation/ Middle Floor Plan 5. Please specify the required light activation at the top of the stairs, per R303.6.1 6. Please add a smoke alarm outside of bedroom 3. Smoke alarms shall be installed outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms. R313.2 7. Please clarify on the drawing how the under floor crawl space will be vented. This shall be shown on the drawings R408.1 8. Crawl space ventilation shall be a maximum of 3' from each corner. R408.2 9. Note minimum required finish wall material & height in the shower & bath areas. R307.2. Sheet 4 Upper Floor Plan 10. Please add a smoke alarm outside of master bedroom. Smoke alarms shall be installed outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms. R313.2 Page 3 of 6 Plan Review Number 01 EECE#: EDM 08-76 Johnson Residence 2008-0593 11. Please add a smoke alarm outside bedroom 2. R313.2 12. The drawings appear to show a closet around the water heater at the utility room. Please add the information per M1305 13. Please provide detail for the construction of the deck and the deck guards. Nothing is specified at this time accept schematically. Sheet 10 Section B 14. Please clarify sections KIS6 noted in the sections. This appears not to be correct. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Shoring 15. Please note special inspections are required for the installations of the shoring block all. 16. Please note that the geotechnical engineer shall perform the monitoring for the durations of the foundations system. Please note this on the drawings. General IT Engineer of Record(EOR), please clarify how the KZT was determined to be 1 for . this structures. This appears not to be correct for this structure. ASCE figure 6-4. 18. Geotechnical report gives parameters per the IBC 2003 and not the IBC 2006. Please modify to the IBC 2006. Sheet 5 Lower Floor Foundation 19. EOR, please dimension the size of the footing under the post next to the retaining wall footing in order to check the capacity.. Sheet 6 Main Floor Framing 20. EOR, provide analysis for the 4x8 ledger supporting the 4x10 beam. Sheet 8 Roof Plan 21. Please submit analysis for the (2) 2x8 over the kitchen window. Sheet S1 Foundation Plan Page 4 of 6 Plan Review Number 01 EECE4: EDM 08-76 Johnson Residence 2008-0593 22. EOR, please submit analysis for the 4x10 ledger span at the knock out area. This should include the connections of the ledger to the wall. Per check analysis, it appears this will not support the design loads. 23. EOR, please add detail Q on sheet S6 as referenced on this sheet. 24. Please incorporate the geotechnical recommendations noted for this sheet. It appears this has not been addressed at this time. Sheet S2 Main Floor Framing Plan 25. EOR, please provide analysis for the 4x 10 being support by the 4x8 ledger. 26. EOR, please provide analysis for the 4x8 ledger supporting the 5-118X9 GLB. Per check analysis, it appears this will not be able to support the design loads. 27. EOR, the analysis states the glu-beam for1B5 shall be a 10-314X9 but the drawing do not reflect this. Please modify accordingly, 28. EOR, the design analysis framing between grid D and grid F do not match the drawings. Please modify accordingly or submit analysis for the modifications. 29. EOR, please clarify the size of the covered deck framing. This also should include the connections. Sheet S3 2nd Floor Framing Plan 30. EOR, please specify the required deck ledger size and connections shown on this sheet. IBC 1604.8.3 31. EOR, please specify the required multiple stud to beam connections. IBC 2304.9.7 32. EOR, Simpson LB hangers are not approved to be in contact with pressure treated lumber. Please modify accordingly. R319.3 and Simpson 1-800-999-5099 Sheet S4 Roof Framing 33. EOR, please specify the required multiple stud to beam connections. IBC 2304.9.7 34. EOR, please specify the required collector element for the shear wall mark W6 at the master bedroom, dining and kitchen area. There are no collector elements specified. Page 5 of 6 Plan Review Number 01 EECE#: EDM 08-76 Johnson Residence 2008-0593 35. EOR, please provide a details at the shear wall W6 at the deck area. The roof trusses extend over this shear walls and it is not clear how the diaphragm forces will be transfer to these walls. Please modify the drawings accordingly. Sheet S5 General Notes, Schedules, Tables & Details 36. Please clarify on the plan the locations of the surcharge area so the contractor used the correct portion of the retaining wall chart. 37. Please update the details shown on the sheet to the recommendations of the geotechnical report. For example, detail J should have 24" free drain and not 18" as noted in the detail. 38. Detail J: the 4x8 ledger as shown will brace the wall and the tension face for the retaining wall will be on the inside face not outside. Also the geotechnical reports states the reinforcement should be placed in to allow back fill before floor system is installed. It appears this has not bee dealt with on the drawings. Please modify the drawings to reflect Zipper Zeman Associates recommendations dated may 30, 2008. 39. Please note the plate washer shall be a minimum 3" x 3" x 0.229" at all anchor bolts. The shear wall schedule note 10 states 2X2X3/16. R602.11.1. and IBC 2305.3.11 40. Detail A/S5: Please modify the detail to incorporate the geotechnical recommendations. For example the trench depth and width of 1'. Sheet S6 Details 41. Detail K: Please modify the hanger call out stating U210. This hanger is not approved to be used in contact with treated lumber per Simpson catalog.R319.3 VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMENTS General 42. I was unable to determine the size and the locations of the whole fan for this structure. The Qty of Edmonds form states to be placed in the hall by the stairs but ---- { Deleted: --------------- ------ this is not shown on the drawings. Sheet 4 Upper Floor Plan 43. Please specify and show the how the dryer will be vented to the exterior. The duct shall not terminate less then 3 feet from any opening. M1505.2 Page 6 of 6 Plan Review Number 01 EECE4: EDM 08-76 Johnson Residence 2008-0593 ENERGY COMMENTS Prescriptive method Used General 44. Please specify the required window U value on the drawings. WSEC Table 6-1 Additional corrections may be required following receipt of corrections and additional information as requested. Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Fire Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes, clarifications or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building Department plan review when comments are received from the other concerned departments. Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please contact Hoyt Jeter at (360) 874- 0562 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. By: "-L ✓ Hoyt Jeter, P.E. President CITY OF EDMONDS SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT The project at _ r011 _ - - TGi4 , WF -5T- - issued under building permit P J -- number . 2Q�Lj Q1jJ3 requires special inspection and/or testing per IBC Chapter 17. The complete list of special inspections is attached to this document. BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The owner and contractor and special inspector shall complete this agreement and the attached structural test(s) and inspections schedule including the required acknowledgements. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL INSPECTORS: Each special inspector shall be approved by the Building Official prior to performing any duties or inspections. Each special inspector shall submit Statement of Qualifications to the Building Official for review_ Special inspectors shall display identification when performing special inspections on site. Special inspection and testing shall meet the minimum requirements of IBC Chapter 17 and the following: A. Duties and Responsibilities of the Special Inspector 1. Observe Work The special inspector shall observe the site work for conformance with the approved (stamped) plans and specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC. Architect or Engineer reviewed shop drawings may be used only as an aid to inspection. Special Inspections are to be performed on a continuous basis --meaning that the special inspector is on site at all times observing the work requiring special inspection. Periodic inspections, if any, must have prior approval by the City basedon a separate written plan reviewed and approved by the Building Official and the engineer or architect of record. 2. Report Non -conforming Items The special inspector shall bring non -conforming items to the immediate attention of the contractor and note all such items in the daily field report. Any item not resolved in a timely manner shall be immediate cause of the special inspector to notify the Building Official of the plan deviation, error, change or omission. It shall also be the duty of the special inspector to promptly notify the engineer or architect. 3. Complete Daily Reports Each special inspector shall complete and sign both the special inspection record and the daily report form for each day's inspection. These records shall remain at the jobsite with the contractor for review by the City Building Inspector. 4. Furnish Weekly Reports The special inspector or inspection agency shall furnish the City with weekly reports of tests and inspections. The project engineer or architect, and others as designated shall also be copied on reports. Weekly reports must include the following: • Description of daily inspections and tests made with applicable locations • List of all tion -conforming items + Report on status of non -conforming items (resolved or unresolved) • Itemized changes authorized by the Architect, Engineer and City if not included in non- conformance items. 5. Furnish Final Construction Report The special inspector or inspection agency shall submit a final signed report to the City stating that all items requiring special inspection and testing were fulfilled and reported. And, to the best of L_l'I'EMPIBUILDTNG1SpecialInspectionAgreementlBC_doe 7104 his/her knowledge the project is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, approved change orders and the applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC. Items not in conformance or unresolved items or any discrepancies in inspection coverage, (i.e., missed inspections, periodic inspection when continuous inspections were required, etc.) shall be specifically itemized in this report. B. Contractor Responsibilities 1. Notify the Special Inspector It is the duty of the contractor to notify the special inspector when work is ready for special inspection. Note, the items listed on the attached schedule and as noted on the approved plans and specifications are required to have special inspections. Adequate notice shall be provided by the contractor so that the special inspector has time to become familiar with the project. 2. Provide Access to Approved Plans The contractor is responsible for providing the special inspector access to approved plans at -the jobsite. 3. Retain Special Inspection Records The contractor is responsible to retain at the jobsite all special inspection records submitted by the special inspector. These records are to be provided to the City building inspector upon request. C. City of Edmonds Buil_dinp Department Responsibilities 1. Approve special inspectors or inspection agencies The building department shall approve all special inspectors and special inspection requirements. 2. Monitor special inspection and approve weekly reports Work requiring special inspection and the performance of special inspectors shall be monitored by the City Building Inspector. Ilis/Her approval must be obtained prior to placement of concrete or other similar activities in addition to that of the special inspector. 3. Issue Certificate of Occupancy The Building Official may issue a Certificate of Occupancy after all weekly special inspection reports including the final report have been submitted and accepted. D_ Owner Responsibilities The project owner or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agent shall fund special inspection services. E. Engineer or Architect of Record Responsibilities The engineer or architect of record shall include special inspection requirements on the plans and specifications. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have read and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Owner Date Special Inspector Date General Contractor Date City Building Official Date L_VMMP\BUILDINGISpeciallnspectionAgreementlBC_doc 7104 SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE PROJECT NAME $tJnDMPERMtr>vo. PROJECTAVDR.ES$ AGErtC3lorSPECIAL tnrsPEGtoR REINFORCED CONCRETE, GUNrM GROUT AND MORTAR: Coocrrtc Gt rhe Grit tu.. — PRECAST/PRESTRESSED CONCRETE: Piles Past -Tens Pre -Tens ate Tests eittg Tule Tests Mix Reinforcing Placement Insert Placement Conctele Batching Concrete Placenxnt Installation Inscpaion Cast SarnDlcs Tests MASONRY-. Special Inspection Sucsses Used PJeliminuy Acceptance Tests tMasomv Units_ Wall Pnsncsl ' — Snbscgtxnt Tests (Morar. Groot. Field Wall Prisms) — Piaeunent Inspection of Units ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER TESTS AND INSPECTIONS: STRUCI`URAL STEELIWELDING: -- Sample and Test (list specific Jnembm below) -- Shop Material Identil-ic,don Welding Inspection D Shop D FWd — UkrAsonic Inspection DSbop E) VxId high-strength Boiling inspection D Shop IJ Field D A32-5 0 A49 DN OX . DF — Metal Deck Welding Inspection — Rcinfotdag Steel Welding htspMfWn Metal Stud Welding Inspection — COM Ic Insert Welding luspection FIREPROOFING: — Placement Inspection — Density Tests - Thickness Tests — Inspect Batching INSULATING CONCRETE: — Sample and Tcst — Placement Inspection — Unit Weights FILL MATERIAL:. — Acceptance Tests — Placemcni Inspection — Field Density STRUCTURAL WOOD- - Shear Wall Bailing Inspection — Inspection of Glu -lam Fab_ Inspection of Ttuss Joist Fab_ — Sample and Test CompDwmts As required by Ordinance #3632 the geotechnical engineer of record shall monitor this site during construction for compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including: site excavation, shoring, soil support for foundation including piles, soil bearing capacity, subdrainage installation, soil compactions, and other geotechnical aspects of the construction. Specific recommendations contained in the approved geotechnical report must be implemented by the owner. The geotechnical engineer shall make written, dated reports on the progress of the construction and submit the report to the Building Ofticial on a weekly basis until all site grading, drainage, foundation and associated ground work is complete. Omissions or deviations from the approved geotechnical report and/or approved plans or specifications shall be highlighted and immediately submitted in a separate letter to the City for review. The City shall be advised in writing of work stoppages of more than one week. In addition to the geotechnical monitoring, special inspections based on the provisions of IBC Section 1704 are required when specified on the approved plans. Other special inspections may also be required by the geotechnical engineer, architect, or structural engineer (refer to approved plan set). At the completion of final site grading and all permitted structures, a final geotechnical report, prepared by the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to the Building Official. This report shall contain a statement that, based upon his/her professional opinion, site observations, and testing during the monitoring of the construction, the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements. Any deviations or omissions its the report, plans, or specifications that occurred during construction shall be addressed separately. Occupancy, final approval or release of the bond for the project shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the Building Official.