2013-0466 Echelbarger SFR2.pdf
City of Edmonds
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
(425) 771-0220
DATE: July 12, 2013
TO: Todd Echelbarger
todd@echelbarger.com
FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner
RE: Plan Check: BLD2013-0466
th
Project: Echelbarger SFR 86 Place W
th
Project Address: 18122 86 Place W
During a review of the plans for the above noted project, it was found that the following
information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to where the
changes can be found on the plans, cloud all changes on the revised plans, and submit the revised
plans/documents to a Permit Coordinator. Items that recur on this list appear in italics. Thank you.
On page A4:
1.Indicate on the plans the required footings to support the loads where the ends of two
Beams 18 meet and combine with the north end of the north Beam 24 5-1/4x11-7/8 PSL
2.0, at the south end of the south Beam 24, and where the ends of Beams 24 bear at the
center of the garage. The option noted on page A5 to post down center & have (2)
5.25x11.875 PSL 2.0 will result in an unsupported point load. If the option is chosen, there
is no specified isolated footing shown on the building plans to guide proper construction and
inspection.
2.Indicate on the plans the required footings to support the loads where the ends of two
Beams 18 meet and combine with the north end of the north Beam 25 5-1/4x11-7/8 PSL
2.0, at the south end of the south Beam 25, and where the ends of Beams 25 bear at the
center of the garage. The option noted on page A5 to post down center & have (2)
5.25x11.875 PSL 2.0 will result in an unsupported point load. If the option is chosen, there
is no specified isolated footing shown on the building plans to guide proper construction and
inspection.
On page A5:
3.Clarify the callout for Beam 9 3-1/8x12 24F-V4 GLB it appears to be over spanned.
The provided structural calculations seem to indicate a smaller roof area being supported
by the beam than that represented on page A6. The provided calculations for Beam 9 (see
attachment) appear to represent a partial uniform load from 0-4 feet from the roof. The roof
framing plan on page A6 indicates that about 9 feet of roof will be supported by that beam.
4.Clarify the callout for Beam 17 6x8 DF #2 (over the 6.0x8.0 French doors in the west
wall of the Great Room) it appears to be over spanned. The provided structural
calculations indicated a 4x10 HF #2 at that location. It appears that Beam 15 6x12 DF
#2 over the 6.0x8.0 French doors in the west wall of the Nook was changed to HF instead.
Page 2 of 2