Loading...
2015-0224 Neuman SFR3 - Greenwalk.pdf City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: June 16, 2015 TO: Steve Barnes sbarnes@cornerstonearch.com FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner RE: Plan Check: BLD2015-0224 Project: Neuman SFR Project Address: 390 Sunset Avenue N During a review of the plans by the Building Division for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications, or changes are needed. A complete review cannot be performed until the revised plans/documents, including a written response indicating where the ‘clouded’ or otherwise highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans, have been submitted to a Permit Coordinator. Reviews by other divisions, such as Planning, Engineering, or Fire, may result in additional comments. Items that recur on this list appear in italics. On sheet AC1 – General Notes: 1.Energy Notes - Note F – Update the information regarding the option selected to achieve the minimum additional energy credits per the currently adopted code. The response to the plan review comment states: “Note F, changed as requested.”. The earlier review comment requested updated information in the context of the disparity between the stated gas demand and the sum of that required by the individual appliances. The current response, changing the selected WSEC Table R406.2 option from ‘5b’ (1.5 credits) to ‘5a’ (0.5 credits) requires additional options to be selected to achieve the minimum number of credits, 1.5. On sheet S1 – Structural Notes Foundation Details: 2.Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 – Foundation Detail(s) and Thickened Slab Edge Detail – Clarify the difference in the required footing and bottom of wall reinforcement specified and that noted in the ‘Foundations’ notes on the same sheet. The response to the plan review comment states: “The reinforcing schedule has been changed to it \[sic\] matches the reinforcing called out in details.”. No change was observed on the resubmitted sheet. On sheet S3 – Second Floor Framing Plan/Details: nd 3.2 Floor Framing Plan - Clarify the callout for the 4x12s DF #2 over ‘Bedroom 1’ to be used to support the loads from the floor framing above. They appear to be over spanned and fail in bending. The response to the plan review comment states: “Beam with wall load above has been change \[sic\] to 5 1/8”x12GLB.”. No changes were observed on the resubmitted sheet.