20150306105613611.pdfMarch O3,2O1S
Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner
City ufEdmonds
121S,' Avenue N-2ou Hov/
Edmonds,VVA 98820
RE:Plan Check: BLD2O14-1246
PnjectNoIT) e:QIII HHoNinf,"sRemode/
DearChuck,
Iternized below is OUr response to the review comi,nents in the FebrUary 24, 2015 letter for
the above /efe|encedproject. Our response appears inbold.
Sheets A7,01
l� �uhiiedum|NoheC|ari8cadon
ArcIfltc',�rl,''to respond,
�o��� 0 "1
2. CodeAna|ysis-TenaVt/rnprovem2Ut
/Nrchitect to respond,
Sheet A2.11
I Paditiun-Type:yusemb|yLeQend
Architect to respond.
Sheet A2,12
4� Detail 2-EastBevadon
Architect to respond,
5. Detail 3-West Elevation
Architect to respond,
6, Detail 3 -- 2 1 lour Firc, Rated COILImn Wrap
Architect tc�) respond.
Architect to respond,
�311EdmondsStApt,--- 14Z2�.1O
Comment Response #2
K8aub&t2U1S
Page 2of: 2
& Detail 1--- FoundadonP|an--- arid Detail 2Second Floor Framing Plan
a) Clarify the difference in the wall opening indicate(] in the west wall of' 'Space 10V
Entry/Reception --- and that represented oir sheet 'A2,11' Floor Plan on sheet 'A2.12', West
Elevation (inClUding ('Opening Area Calculations') -- and on sheet 'A7.01' Ceiling Plan, The plans
should consistently represent the proposed construction ioguide proper review, installation,
and inspection,
S2J has been updated to im"itch the architectural plans,
b\ (Jarify the difference in [lie wall opening indicated in the west wall of'Space 1.05'—Kk'hen
—
and that represented on sheet'A2,11'—Floor Plan — on sheet 'A2.12'—West E|evaUon(induding
'Opening Area CalCUlations') — arid on sheet 'A7,01' Ceiling Plan. The plans ShOUld COnSiStently
represent the proposed construction toguide proper review, installation, and inspection,
S2.1. has been updated to match tile -:11'ChiteCtUral plans,
9. Deiai|J—SeoondRoorFmmingMan
`> Clarify ihe caUoui for the 'HGS 4x4x1/8' cniumns be|nvv ihe ends of the 5'1/8x15 C)LBs to be used
to suppoll the Second floor frarning. They do not ippear to nreet the nihIMAL1111 I'eCJUWe111C'IitS Of
the propnsed 2huur �re-pesis�ance rated construcbon ofUL design number '%S3P,'
The NS!,,;4x4x1/8nm}unnnmhave [)eenmhamged tsFISS4*4u3/l6tmnnt�etthe mdninnum
rmquiremen��M"the r,�rnpused2'hourfire rated ofklL6ed�nnumber�5�8See
OetaU 2 mfsbeet S2.1,
b) Clarify tire callout for the 5-4/8)(15 G1.13s to be LNed to support tile floor frarning over, space '107'
—uKice2—andthenokh-mostpordonofspace'1O2'—OpenOffice.Theyappeartobeuver
spannedandfai|inbending —seeattachmenLs.
fhe glUlarn bezinis have been changed to W8x24 steel beailis in order to provide fire
protection, Seethe attached structur71 ca|Cu|�AUmns, Detai| 2 cin 9heotS2.J, Detail 7 on Sheet
S4A, and Dota|| 4 on Sheet04.2. Fteferto the architeChlra| p|ano for, the fire protection details.
The loads used todesign tile beams are based Vnuniformloading and tribmtaryWmen-to the
lu,mms, it appears that the loads used in the calctrhation provided in the comment letter were
/ncuns|stentwith theUniform loading arid tributary area tothe beam, Please refer tmthe
Sheet 3 ofth(_� struUwra| ca|cu|atiomsfor gravity loading,
Additional Revlsions�
L Sh"LICtUral Notes have been revised tO inClUde Parallarn Mernber specifications.
If you have any questions orcommen(s regarding the responses to this review please do not hesitate to
Sincerely,
CG Engineering
~�
DennisTituS,Pit, SE.
��� ���7- ' 204mA�S�nw��VA�00
��
p,426J78.8500 t425J78,5536