Loading...
400 5TH AVE S.PDF11111111111111 14693 400 5TH AVE S `)FTO �20 Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners December 21, 1983 File No. 02-83-191 Revised January 13, 1984 Storm Water Detention System Calculations for the Echelbarger Company on Ptn. of SE4f SE., Sec. 23, T27N, R3E W.M. (Parcel B of Edmonds Short Plat # S-51-79) , •rwww w�, . . �,� Existing Site Conditions (See attached RMA survey) Developed 1 story apartment building with lawn. , Area = 0.156 Ac. or 6,812 sq. ft. 041 ss3��.�';�� Slope = Westerly 6% S. P/L and benched N. P/L ••,sH��� Tc = 128/ (2) 60 + 10 = 11 min .✓ Intensity = i = 1.8 in/hr. Everett Curve 10 year storm V eeQ��m�w�w Existing runoff coefficient proration Apartment and walkways 2770 sq. ft. or 0.063 Ac. , Lawn areas 4042 sq. ft. or 0.093 Ac. ®ems (0.9)(0.063) + (0.25)(0.093) = 0.51� - 0.156 Qexisting = Qallowable = ciA = (0.51)(l.8)(0.156) = 0.14 c.f.s. ,�— V'' Using the Yrjanainen & Warren Method for simple detention system design the following calculations are to determine the required volume of detention for this development. Future Site Conditions (See attached site plan) Prorated runoff coefficient 14 Building = 2882 sq. ft. or 0.066 Ac. @ 0.9 Asphalt and walkways = 2724 sq. ft. or 0,071 Ac. @ 0.9 . •0115 Planters = 0.019 Ac. @ 0.2 (0.2)(0.019) + (0.9)(0.137) = 0.81 0.156 Future c = 0.81 Qo = 0.14 = 1.108 ale (0.156) T = - 25 + j(2255 = 20.11 min. 1.108 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775-3434 r , Page 2 Vs = 3607 ( :5 ) 1608.00- 891.28 = 716.72 ft.3/Ac C Vtota I = 716.72 ((-1.6 = Z ft.3� Sizing the Orifice Qallowable = O c.f.s. Using the orifice equation Q = cdA`.2gh Assuming h = 1.5' Solving for A = cd g = O'er = 0.02297 ft.2 0.62 i;r 64.4 1.5 if 2 1/16" orifice is used h will change A = 0.0232 ft.2 Solving for h = 2 _ 0.14 2 �dA Y2g - '� .62 0.0232 764.4 1.47' = h Use 1.48' � Sizinq the Detention Svstem Required volume of detention = ifs ft.3 CBMH No. 1 = 12.57 ft.3/V.F, x 1.48 V.F. = 18.60 ft.3 CBMH No. 1 to CBMH No. 2 = 52 1J. 15" pipe @ 1.23 ft.3/1.f. = 63.96 ft.3,, CB No. 2 = 5.78 ft.3/V.F, x 1.48' V.F. = 8.55 ft.3 d' Total volume provided = 91.11 ft.3 Required Volume = 90.56 ft•3 Excess provided 0.55 ft. Therefore ok. d FILE Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners December 21, 1983 File No. 02-83-191 Revised January 13, 1984 Storm Water Detention System Calculations for the Echelbarger Companv on Ptn. of SE4, SE4, Sec. 23, T27N, R3E W.M. (Parcel B of Edmonds Short Plat # S-51-79) Existing Site Conditions (See attached RMA survey) Developed 1 story apartment building with lawn. Area = 0.156 Ac. or 6,812 sq. ft. Slope = Westerly 6% S. P/L and benched N. P/L Tc = 128/(2)60 + 10 = 11 min. Intensity = i = 1.8 in/hr. Everett Curve 10 year storm Existing runoff coefficient proration Apartment and walkways 2770 sq. ft. or 0.063 Ac. Lawn areas 4042 sq. ft. or 0.093 Ac. (0.9)(0.063) + (0.25)(0.093) = 0.51 0.156 Qexisting = Qallowable = ciA = (0.51)(1.8)(0.156) = 0.14 c.f.s. Using the Yrjanainen & Warren Method for simple detention system design the following calculations are to determine the required volume of detention for this development. Future Site Conditions (See attached site plan) Prorated runoff coefficient Building = 2882 sq. ft. or 0.066 Ac. @ 0.9 Asphalt and walkways = 2724 sq. ft. or 0.071 Ac. @ 0.9 Planters = 0.019 Ac. @ 0.2 (0.2)(0.019) + (0.9)(0.137) = 0.81 0.156 Future c = 0.81 Qo = 0.14 = 1:108 0. 0. 56 T = - 25 +;r2255 = 20.11 min. 1.108 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775-3434 i Page 2 Vs = 3607 (20.11) - 40(1.108)20.11 = 1608.00- 891.28 = 716.72 ft.3/Ac C 20.11 + 25 Vtotal = 716.72 (0.81)0.156 = 90.56 ft.3 Sizing the Orifice Qallowable = 0.14 c.f.s. Using the orifice equation Q = cdA�.2gh Assuming h = 1.5' Solving for A = cd g = 0.14 -= 0.02297 ft.2 0.62 I; 64.4 Fl.5 if 2 1/16" orifice is used h will change A = 0.0232 ft.2 Solvingfor h = 2 0.14 2 A _ �dY2g - � 0.62 0.0232 )/64.4 1.47' = h Use 1.48' Sizing the Detention System Required volume of detention = 90.56 ft.3 CBMH No. 1 = 12.57 ft.3/V.F. x 1.48 U.F. = 18.60 ft.3 CBMH No. 1 to CBMH No. 2 = 52 1J. 15" pipe @ 1.23 ft.3/1.f. = 63.96 ft.3 CB No. 2 = 5.78 ft.3/V.F. x 1.48' V.F. = 8.55 ft.3 Total volume provided = 91.11 ft.3 Required Volume = 90.56 ft.3 Excess provided 0.55 ft. Therefore ok. r FILE the Echelbarger Land Company PO Box 30, Lynnwood,WA98036,(206) 774-0205 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES f r 414 FIFTH AVE. SOUTH Bond #1 \Landsa in $2000 To a] $2000 Propos d Bond: !O$2000 Bond #2 Paving Alley 33 sq. yds. Parking Lot a it Is 3 sq. yds. x $5 sq. yd.- $3115 Sidewalks 148 sq. yds. a ea = $ 600 Utilities Alley $4000 On Site Rete tion, etc. $2000 Total $9715 j �� 610,-4; ?vw �/T/ � z RETALLICK CONSTRUCTION '. O Box 267 Maryswlle, WA 98270 334-0313 Project: The Old Church General Contractor: The Echelbarger Co. Date: March 8, 1984 Re: Landscaping n Per your a -proved plan for landscaping, and install the following tax.x. pro pose to for $1100 + P furnish QTY (4) Malus 14" caliper (3) Rhodo medium size (6' max. height) (11) Rhodo small (4) Dwarf Skimmia Japonicam(I height) (5) Evergreen Enonymus (1 al.9a1.) (6) Acuba Japonica (1 ) ) al, (2) Vine Maple "9 (med. clump" size) (2) Viburuum Odoratissimum (1 gal.) (24) True dwarf boxwood (1 gal.) Top soil as required with 2 inches minimum de mulch. Tree staking/wiring included. Pth fine bark Terms: Net 10 days - Discounted amount $1045.00 + tax. TOM BELT 778-0247 12 & - M (fontructorj P 0 BOX 216 LYNNWOOD WA 98036 The '?chFlY,argr'r ro. ?' . 11 Ro): 30 Lynnwood, :9a. 98046 '�ttn: Lirr.ey Dear sir; 3-5-84 PeFer - office site - 5th Ave, (`ur hid for an on site storm ana retention is $2980.00 Plus sales tax. This includes Cr 12 - 52' of 15" storm and T•'u C3 tl and restrictor. hi. -groadsA Thanks. '-1p have not included any alley restoration or repair. Yours truly, n;r' r a V i:JLLraCLorS 776-2829 OLDS OLYMPIC INC. L OOD OFFICE SEATTLE OFFICE 0. e0x 1so OPERATING OLYMPIC PAVING 3400 STONE WAY N. 6016 204TH S.W. HEATING OILS e ASPHALT PAVING SEATTLE. WA 98103 LYNNWOOD. WA 98M 632_0450 778-3124 HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE ///� �,r —6 4 JOB LOCATION STREET ADDRESS: Ste. S CITY, STATE, ZIP , i:' c . i n R^4a�- •r.-.. rY � E�,-.����.���• ��`.,. SAC � � ,�_,.,� .r-.:�G � • c�a tf ��„�MPJat: � r.� s EJ'AJG QeAgC a& _. rday lie Q7RSv & RICE ALL PRICES PLUS TAX A Into payment charge may be made on any past due balance, which the law calls "FINANCE AUTHORIZ a CHARGE-, and it is computed at a monthly rate of 1v,% (ANNUAL SIGNATURE PERCENTAGE RATE OF EIGHTEEN PERCENT). It is agreed that in case suit is instituted to collect amount due on this contract or any portion thereof, reason- THIS PRO30sk MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY US IF NOT ACCEPTED able attorneys fees and court costs may be added to this Contract. WITHIN 30 DAYS Permits, it required, will be the owner's responsibility. We shall not be liable for damage to or breakage of septic tanks, underground pipes, and or conduits not visible from the surface of the ground nor for any damage to approaches (Including sidewalks) from the street to the property line. We cannot be responsible for sub grade failures or settling of subgrade material which was not Installed under the above agreement. Soil sterilization (weed kllla4, It included In contract, will be applied at rates specified by manufacturer. Olds Olympic Inc. will not be responsible for any subs& quenl growths of horsetail weed, morning glory, deep rooted ferns, or perennials, which have not reached maturity prior to application. All material is guaranteed as specified. All work to be completed In a workman4lke manner according to standard practices. Olds Olympic Inc, accepts no responsibility for any work other than that specifically described above. Any additions to or alterations of the above work•wru executed only upon written orders and may become an additional charge. All agreements are contingent on strikes, accidents, delays of carriers, and other delays unavoidable or beyond our control. ACCEPTANCE —YOUR SIGNATURE ON ONE COPY, RETURNED TO US; WILL MAKE THIS A LEGAL CONTRACT PENDING ACCEPTABLE CREDIT APPROVAL SIGN AND RETURN FOR ACCEPTANCE ACCEPTANCE BY D � � J=j FILE September 29, 1983 MEMO TO: Architectural Design Board FROM: Dan Smith Engineering Inspector SUBJECT: ADB MEETING - OCTOBER 5. 1983 AGENDA: ADB-62-83 DAIRY QUEEN DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT (LYLE OLMSTEAD) - Review of modification to existing freestanding sign for drive-in res- taurant at 7530 212th St. S.W. (BN) No comment. ADB-75-83 CHRYSALIS FOUNDATION (MICHAEL & LISA STORRIE-LOMBARDI) - Review of canvas awnings with address painted on entry awning for structure at 226 Dayton St. (BC -Contract Rezone) No comment. ADB-76-83 VERN HODGSON - Review of site plan and elevations for conver- sion of existing single-family dwelling and two -car attached garage at 7116 208th St. S.W. to a duplex. (RM-1.5) The parking layout as submitted is satisfactory. The existing gravel driveway shall have to be removed. Applicant required to sign covenant to "Support L.I.D.," prior to building permit being issued. ADB-78-83 UNIVERSITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK - Review of new freestanding sign to replace existing freestanding sign for bank at 130 5th Ave. S. (BC) No comment. ADB-80-II3 PATRICK & LINDSEY ECHELBARGER - Review of plan to move former church structure to 414 5th Ave. S. and remodel for use as offices and/or retail. (BC) The parking layout as submitted appears acceptable. The two tandem parking stalls, should be "employee stalls." The alley requires paving and drainage improvements, as established in Short Subdivision S-51-79. An on -site drainage system will be required with building permit application. The sidewalk im- provement on 5th should match the existing adjacent walk. INTER -OFFICE COMMUNICATIONS}`;, � u} MLL �� U DATE September 22, 1983 To James E. Adams, City Engi:neer FROM Teresa Quigley/Planning Secretary Gary McComas/Fire Marshal SUBJECT: MOVE CHURCH STRUCTURE TO 400 FIFTH.AVE. S. AND REMODEL FOR USE AS OFFICES AND/OR RETAIL (ADB-80-83) Please review the attached application and return your comments to,Duane Bowman by September 26, 1983. This item will be considered at the October 5, 1983 ADB meeting. Thanks! DATE�� ✓u -:�' FILE 41 SITE PLAN ✓ CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA ✓ RECEIPT SIGN EXHIBITS FEE RECPT # PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE AIR/REPRESENTATIVE Patrick Echelbarger/ Lindsey Echelbarger PHONE 774-0205 ADDRESS P.O. Box 30; Lynnwood, WA ZIP CODE 98036 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Warren Lafon, AIA PROPERTY ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHONE 774-0580 400 Fifth Avenue South ZONING 8 C L' 1.0..9 at the inte►sectlon of the north margin of tealnut Street (60 feet ride) and the west wrg;n of Sth Ave. S. (60 feet ride); thence NO'02'20'V along the ..pest narg;n of Sih Ave. S. 140.90 feet to the True Point of {eglmity; thence S89'44'40'b parallel with the north margin of Walnut Street, 94.51 feet; thence $0'02'20"E parallel eith the west margin of Sth Ave. S. 24.00. feet; thence S89'44'4X'W parallel with the north margin of walnut Street 28.20 feet to the east margin or an alley; thence NO'02'20'V along the east margiw ' of the alley 74.00 feet; t•+ence M89'44'40"E parallel with the north margin of PLANS SUBMITTED FOP. APPROVAL- walnut street, 122.%1 feet to the west eargin of 5th Ave. S.; thence W 0220Y along the west wrgin of S_h Ave. S.. 50.00 feet to the True Point of beginning: Situate in Snohomish County. Washington. 1. Building Plans - Preliminary Final x Site Plan x Landscape Plan x Elevations x 2. 3. Sign Elevations >_Site Plan_ Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY vacant land Landscape Plan DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Applicants plan to move a structure formerly used as a church at the corner of 6th and Walnut to the above location, rehabilitate and remodel for use as offices and/or retail. APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT November 1983 ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK March 1984 RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per- mission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. (Signaorure of Appl' ant) 0 f » . ENVIRONMENJAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Patrick Echelbarger/Lindsey Echelbarger 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent P.O. Box 30; Lynnwood, WA 98036 774-0205 3. Date Checklist Submitted Sept. 21, 1983 4. Agency Requiring Checklist Community Development 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable 414 Fifth Avenue Building 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: _Applicants plan to move a former church building to the site, and remodel and rehabilitate structure into an office and retail building. Approx. size 4100sf; Old Edmonds design style. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Vacant lot covered with light brush and grass. Slopes from Fifth Avenue to alley. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal March, 1984 9. List of all Permits, Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): —ADB approval, building permit, sign permits. No rezones or variancecA requested 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: f B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion Of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x Explanation: b. soil compaction wi l l be required C. topography may be slightly altered, but basically the exis grade will be maintained. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? x b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? x -2- 5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: YES MAYBE a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? C. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: NO x x x 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase exist ing noise levels? _ Explanation: Currently site is vacant and thus produces no noise, proposed use as office/retail building will create some noise although no uses producing objectionable 1 vels (music etc) are envi- 7. Lj_qht�� and Glare. Will the proposal s ioned. produce new Tight or glare? x Explanation: No light or glare is currently produced New use would be in line with similar uses whi-c-h--create lit le nr no Ob-PCtionahle —alarP or new lights 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Explanation: Causing the structure to be remodelled will slightly increase usage of natural resources such as wood gravels sands -4- YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? X Explanation: 11. _Population. Will the proposal alter the oca o distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Explanation: 12. �Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? X _ b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? x c. Impact upon existing transportation X systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or X goods? — e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or ' air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: The current use of site as vacant lot generates no traffic or traffic hazards. New use will slightly increase these but not to a detrimental level -5- YES MAYBE NO , 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? x b. Police protection? x c. Schools? x — d. Parks or other recreational facilities? x e. Maintenance of public facilities, x including roads? f. Other governmental services? x Explanation: Being a vacant lot there is consequently negligible or slight demand on public services As a developed project there would necessarily be a slight increase needed to service the project It is presumed that project would only slightly impact public services as it is located in a developed area. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? x Explanation: The vacant lot requires no energy. A developed project would require some energy use though these demands would not be classified as 11substantial." 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ x b. Communications systems? x c. Water? x d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? x Explanation: Alterations needed would be mainly of a connection service category and would not require substantial new systems or alterations to existing systems. ff-11 r. 1 YES Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Y MAYBE NO x 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will in an impact upon tity of existing tunities? Explanation: the proposal result the quality or quan- recreational oppor- 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: C. SIGNATURE x I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaratior or non -significance that it might issue in reliance u on this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of%f 11 disclosure on my part. PRf1DnNFNT IN Ij 6— �2 d co V(\j 0 (3u) 0 UJ zr; LM co DA m 7 Lu cl C'4 :m 0 co, w cg r VI C', Ati" 0 0 0 tl -1 1. Nj o6c� ti'mE ON Silvis 9 LU (D U) Z uj to NOO tz inNIVM f ez B y so�o 03 ooa , s-v v s sz: .. PoOlommsvm `S0HOW03 3 N a o: '3£'8 "IdLZ'S'ES'�a5 `4!t'3'S'`trt4'3'S '-bd s a uo�d s otaninS aau�.6u3 Dul Sal cpossy } UmalPP!W PIaU AidVdWOO M39t V813MO3 w e ao3 ue'd 6ulRed A6I1tl aOlas , LUJOa3 a o � �1 W LT3 - Z, -D Pi �uu 04 t; lu I,) =axs 7 N - - --------- ----- '9H 133N9 I[11 rEja: -r + - !�77% ItI' v �r E