930795.pdf1*
a
USE PERMIT
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE / ; NUMBER �O',S
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB`�S_APT„
OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS
�� S �Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO LID NO
w MAILING A DRESS �� � /
Z � f
I
O
3/:
�/ � .5 • /- 'T �.�. �� � �' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP 7ESCP Approved ❑
CITY Zip TELEPHONE NUMBER RW Permit Required ❑
n EXISTING REOUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑
l J ��, C •� �I / �~� `�/`/ PROPOSED � /SidewtionR aired 0
NAME Sidewalk Required ❑
cc
Lu
METE SIZ% LIN SIZE NO, OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED G
ADDRESS ✓ I r Z.� YEsX NO ❑
/ n REMARKS
a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER / � s 1A�.,,�� �( Cyr _ z
NAME f 9�', '/�-L. . T I�WX� �'��4 ��•-� W
cr OCo ENGINEERING MEMO DATED 717415�REVIEWE�OJBY
A74ESS r�(jL
AIL
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER
FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY
Z
STATE LICENSE NUMBER
EXPIRATION DATE I`
�i G GlJ C SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW
Legal Description of Property - include all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED 'C Ilir ET E%EMPT 7/LIN
V"ll���j S O ELINE q
p % i� r / f
Fr
/ VARIANCE OR CU ANNI ELIEW BY W
41
/ / • SETBACKS — FEET HEIGHT I LOT C ERA Z
a d Z
w FRONT SIDE REAR
Property
Tax Account REMARKS n.
Parcel No. 2��� �,,�
NEW tJ RESIDENTIAL LJ PLUMBING
ADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL �7
REMODEL APT. BLDG. LJ SIGN r 1 - 1 A477
❑GRADING ❑ FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ICODE� OCCUGROX3
REPAIR CYD ( x _FT)
DEMOLISH ❑ WOODSTOVE - ' 10000 a SWIM POOL SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT
INSERT HOT TUB/SPA REQUIRED YES
� LOAD
)_ /rc�ARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL/ a RENEWAL REMARKS (,/ Tfj
ROCKERY O
o PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 Z
(TYPE OF US IESS PR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: p
IL
rn NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL//y�, t IY ��LJ` L� PIE
0 OF 1UNITS
DWELLING /���v I AREAS
mSTORIES LWej NUMBER
O
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PL91 PLAN)
/✓ lL FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED
Now
�Ae %s�0/v VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
� HC E: BUILDING
GLAZING,
r� 1
EAT SOURC
sJ 0/d PLUMBING
Plan Check No. e?Z.1, , MECHANICAL 47
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL
Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks,
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE ,�(J
Permit Application: 180 Days 2/�
Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE rar
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE 3U
in successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,
2 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
° nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ` 17��6
provision."
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL
information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly
authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until
state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is
tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided.
SIGNATURE (OWNER OR A ENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT
OFF I/LUjSW1GN,,ruRE
DA EG�
OF
�� ' i %�e�l I� --4lj Yp EDIMO DS //% /3
CALL FOR LEASED BY D�
ATTENTION INSPECTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE ��� ®wA®
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 1C ORIGINAL — File YELLOW —Inspector
��u ^MALIrrM lint^
A CERTIFIC;AT t OF OCCUVANUT nna o�cly �nni. i a v.
CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor
102.87
it
. 1ya��h.�tjsj
n. Tell
' r .. , I J? Lrt ..�. !ld, k i -lit
I fit
REC;I�
'I 1 11 f�.•,, '
lop
wt� Z3Z .Ub t�l-
JEP till
r \
o
i l
�
/
el/ I
t
LIP
1 \
i I
, I
---
� o IIIII
C>
APPROVED BY PLANNING
FwAomittu, PiosqN ��
11477_ . 3
n Q otzc VeiOT
`r���
Z 3/0. 00 l_ ;
er
dill
i
.. _ .-I li,z
N
-tif �l F ti HS.• )�<
At tkty«
'pit",ji7ktle
PM
� tr
K .Sy T
iy "JE illtefte,it
I Ile2it, I ttt, l
lie
25 '
i
:3
PERMT COUNTr
AA OAS AdL
J / L o p
to V --- o %
2 36 --- Z33
V I
A
i
-rh3.1-
x Mt,
R'I ,l�j. ILV
f tdrl ���wV
'i tf 4 4t I
w. t
�r-
lp L,
i V
80•6:r�)
.70
3t�
ko -o
;
i
<ACCE TABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL
N.1� one
Sch 40 PVC
r $DR 35 (ASTM 03034)
I�
,�, ZZ V • i�o
51
7 Its,n6APPROVE AS N01
a'� 1 L7
A\/F=
F-H
f C17y.,-
,
F
r-
\`
�P
I C 06
a- 1 s Le Pjg
�.I1lJ r•�
� �1+
B / \ z'
7y6'ICMIC,
CZEcTaoN a Q
r= 1' h4
Col 111 09
is CP Z25
RECEIVED
/
OCT0 l 1993
tot
00 PERMIT COUNTER
A':7 = MIX 1
EX. moose
�y
q/D S/G17:
FUTU�pE
B4 r or w III
ICCP
CCI
r� r
FolI • I
LAT; ATTACHMENTo�RMA "SAND4th ST. S.W.D, WA 98037 ,.
(206) 742-5107 ?rs
rty}5 ° `
e,
r
k
iZC-
i
S
i
,
tC
,YY Ih )yT��la
Y v rihf,s
Its Legal descr-{ptions continued S-17-91 Itri
.� LOT EXHIBIT B
'r
That portion of Tract A. r� r
, to•khe plat of l)C)13SON PARK, as ►•ecor•ded "
in Volume 16 of plats on I pages 90 and 91, records of Snohomish, -County WA., "�•
described as follows:
K
Beginning at the Northeast corner of sasy 1�•
id Tract n, DOBSON PARK, said corner p:�
being on the southerly margin of Olympic View Dr
ive; tJience S 67028170" W Sk
along the southerly margin for 87.17 feets thence S 00521201 W for 134:65 feetP I4"
to , the northwest corner- of a private road Known as Tract X 9 thence S 89107140" E y4'
along .the north margin of said pr•ivate roadfor 66.35 feet to the start of a
curve (the radius point of said curve bears N 0'52'20" E a distance of 35.00• feet); I;€;
P. thence northeasterly along said curve for 20.62 feel. to the end of said; curve;
thence N 5710614511 E for 62.52 feet to the start. of a curve ,(the radius -point of
r� Z
said curve bears S 32°53'15" E a distance of 40.U0 feet); ayr;; thence northeasterly
along said curve for 23.57 feet to the westerly m7r•c {n of 88th Ave We
Y J th"ence'
N 0052'20" E along said westerly margin for 10.00 feet to the northeast corner '
of said Tract A; thence N 89°07140" W for 80. UU feet; thence N 00 52'20" E `
for 111.88 feet to the Point of Beginning:
off
Situated .in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish Co. WA
Containing 14,496 Sq. Ft.
S b1
u lect to a permanent utility easement over the west 1U.00 feet thereof
And:
Subject to a permanent easement for storm sewer purposes that is 10.00 •feet
wide with the center line of said easement being clescr^'bed as follows: commencing`
at the northeast corner of Tract A of said DOBSON PARK ( Volumel6 of plats
pgs. 90 and 91), said corner being on the westerly margin of 88 the Ave We
thence S 0052120" W along the westerly margin of 88t.h Ave.- W for: 6, 30 feet
to the Point of Beginning of said centerline; thence S 69°54'55" W for 249.48
feet; thence N 7°27'15" W for 40.65 feet more or less to the westerly line of
said Tract A, DOBSON PARK and the end of said easement.
Together with a 4 interest in a TRACT X described as follows:
TRACT X. PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY.EASEMENT
y
That portion of TRACT A. according to the plat of f.)UF3SON PARK, as .recorded
In Volume 16 of plats on pages 90 and 91, records of Snohomish. County. Wash,
as follows;
Commencing at the Northeast corner• of'said TRACT A, DOBSON PARK, sal
point being on the westerlymargin of 88th Ave, `
J W; thence S U°52'20" W along
said westerly margin for 10900 feet .to the Point or fieginnirig; said point being
the start of a curve ( the raclius point of said crrr•ve 1,��;ars S r.)°52'20" W a distance'
Of,110.00 feeL); thence in e southwesterly cli► octiuii salrmy the arc of
a distance of 23,57 feel to the tired of said r_urv+_, �aicl curve
• Lhence S 5'1"U6145" W for 62 , 52.
feet to.the start of a curve ( the radius :point of slid curve bears' N 32053'15''W
a distance of 35,00 feet) e thence southwesterl
of 20. G2 feet to the. end of said curve; thence N 189"07' 101, W'for 66.35 feet19 said curve for a ance
thence S 0052120" W for ?_O.00 feet; thence S 8900711. "
E for start of a curve (the radius point of said curve hears S 0052520" W00 F feet
distato tnce
of. 20.00 feet)' thence• easterly and Southerly - -
31 .42 feet to the end of said curve; thence S 89°0 j),� the arc, of said curve for.
10 E for 16.00: feet
N 0°52'20" E for 12. G3 feet to. the start of a curve, ( the .. thence
curve bears S 89°07'40" E a cllst.ance of 20. U0 feet) ;th enc;eli�IsorkheasLeroint of j said
along said curve for a distance of 19.63 feet to the end of said cuve; {fence
N 57°06'45" E for 62 , 55 feet to the• start of a curve (the radius point of said .
y
curve bears S 3205311511 E a distance of 20.00 feet);_ thence easterly a16176. the
arc of said curve a distance of 11..78 feet to the end of said curve, said point 5:
being on the westerly margin of 88th Ave We thence N 0052'20" �
feet to the Point of Beginning. E for 20.00
'r
unIMrnta,i.j ,e:; tu,
I It
or
AUTHOR
to
i izi
:;` , ! tiff ;:::.t)I� .,;.+ r:. , I. �,�;, 1`;FoR aEcoR[
A i 1't V, il'i1 �%I?f•1,} �,�-:;tuff ii�� OF EiDM(
s r,
51
S
nNa �� / / �\ PLAN
EXPIREi10/4/ �'
�unmutruruuiununaumWs renim ; ..'. Q,FPAGE
`t
216020 '
VOL .� 2840.PAGE 19'ad
. rt.
i
t
of of— - _ - ----
_ - _ f�, k
r5, <• V .
. -. _.. .1 4. r .. r' i i i 4r.5wc.If I iRfitY ' h s ra.-3i S
No a
Zot 1
t
Ri.� -
to
it off;
CITY OF EDMONDS ,ito
f .
sl LAURA Me HALLto I
a .«•#8 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR
rr4�t
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT''
18
9 0 19 O Public Works . Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering
-
of
LPrsf
0 4v
Rrij•1:
W
�3r:'e
1fi=',i,
iw
September too
27, 1993
4T' rrr'S
Albert E. Sand :f i
�rz�r
4015 164th S.W., #26 i �t
1 Lynnwood, WA 98037
°A+Ei
t� to Zi:
t;yr�r•
RE: Building Permit Application #93-165 J
Dear Mr. Sand: §
DuringddI
Ian review of the proposed sine y
P p p le Tamil dwellimT at 18106 88th Avenue West it was found that
the following items were not submitted with the permit application, There are two of the mitigating
measures for SEPA, which were required for the approval of your short plat, that we have not yeti(': i
4 rr:
received. Enclosed is a copy of the SEPA Determination for your reference. It is indicated that a
plan for the lots shall he submitted and approved h the Plannim�'�ri
planting p •y � Department prior to issuance 4 .
of the first building permit. Also required is a tree cutting and preservation plan, which is to be
submitted with each building permit application,A
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. iT,rr,
;.;go f
Y5 M
x'{ hxi{t
Sincerely, ik
axe,•
,fir �w,u
Ann Bullis a
PlanninL* Division uhs;v,.4
encL• MDNS for S-17-91 t.y,VJA;
,;?rpF..
TX.
k�
.. Pk y rJ
•r�',
V fir,. N991„
• 1xv. i7
1l r1r, }y
f. s14�
^a?fix'.:
y* �e""•
�i r o,
, y
, I
y�7'Eif. JX4.t.
• Incorporated August 11, 1890 •htA;
,ws
Nxt+y:L
` 1 =
SFster Crt�es International Hekman,'Japan
• ,, t�
e, 1 1 r .... — ...v... .._..... _. 'rr
i n'
'itr4cFi�'.5
n i>
do
y twof
o ffry J14 (.
1'a71,5ti ,"yt 1 a' r
If AV.
� Sro to iI to
to I
It
or
eE 1,"yIttr�it ,. I
Is
,h
r,
"It'i x >: iICc
;.
_ .ems .z±�.:;�&'„��• } t�,til3r ,
�i
l CITY OF EDMONDS
„w LAURA M. HALL
." 250 - 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
I g9O Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering
°1
October 5, 1993
Mr. & Mrs. Albert Sand
4015 164th Street Southwest, #26
Lynnwood, Washington 98037
RE: Single Family Permit Application #93-165
The Building Division has concluded the initial review of the subject application. The
subdivision soils report and the Landau Associates analysis have been studied and it has
been determined that portions of the Earth Subsidence Ordinance shall be required for the
' development of individual lots within the short plat.
The Landau review indicated that site instability and drainage concerns needed to be
addressed in greater detail in order to determine the type, depth and lateral dimensions of
existing landslides, fill placement and subsurface drainage. An investigation by licensed
geotechnical engineer shall be conducted and a report prepared which includes measures
for modifying or stabilizing potential landslides and assesses the risk of future movement. `
Additional test borings including piezometers installations may be necessary,
Subsurface drainage considerations and assessments shall also be addressed and called out
in the geotechnical review. All concerns and/or recommendations shall be discussed with
the designer and the foundation and drainage plans shall be altered accordingly.
Other Earth Subsidence requirements that shall be imposed on this project are:
1) Lead Design Professional declaration. 2) Site specific grading plans prepared by a
licensed engineer. 3) Foundation plans prepared and stamped by a licensed engineer with a
l.
professional declaration. 4) An applicant/owner landslide declaration. 5) A Geotechnical
declaration. 6) A Hold Harmless agreement shall be required.
For your convenience I have enclosed copies of the ordinance for further clarification of
these requirements. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 771-0220,
Thank you, j �' AII(A014.5 60 fl wlil• �Clji9,CL 4-_�
eannine L. Graf sjytm�a� dk f �
Acting Building Official1
cc: Short Plat File S-17-91
6) I~iolcl-\f l less R�
• Incorporated August 11, `1890 •
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Oil t},fi s
ir y,
a,f
t n�.P'rwf i:1 i'
n
$hreul441
i do
A��1 L�t i<ij`4�•
t
-.t Tla�i,fn klo7r1;�.
LIP iP
' _ ...�+� ... ..LP
es rid✓y f •,}t"'qm
1r,1� Y
-- -•r- 4 +
LIP
y �,, J1r.! .
f '! -� 1.. 4 lb, .. ��. ,., `` ' L.fPL4 ,fj tt qi j >r; `rR'3r ;� Yr3•' , L7 10
\ ' PL:.... ...-.N. .�.. _.. ... .. ...a i. �..u+e ..r_.t_.«xu. .�.. �. ... M.�1.. ..rt: Y. �r.e.: Jz ,.. . rl.•. ,.,.. .... w 1'i5+� PI'l I, Wh v..i . a,n..'��V`.�IV( Mr FS 6ML T '• `E
Ll J a !�
S.V. C.H. ,ATn
Eve_'i'ii�t•'l:,J<a�:11',ili��t.,_�}} '��;,:c�l.q
In
LIP
93
Al Zirirl i',I,w,r r,1a _,isIII la
kiiii, VT IA
'r PIP
I;I:PI; 1='l.'ctnt•il"tlp:3s '1.,cii: 'W,I.Dit , and Cllyriipic View Drive = �
Dear Mr. rand 1`1rs . =Oland .
At-t.•ached please find a sk:t✓t•c!'-, arid suc.3gested slant: list regi—oo dine the
proposed pla1"1t•ini.7 t i' native CIIT_Iterial pert yowl" 1'Cquest. IFo}^ it. t',e pI1"clpCritV E
a „»?vt3 . l"I"te 1'lc`t't•:L`ritr..'II" :i l "l �'}'C!`J] dtw sl"',t^ 1.11t•t_1" , beiniq ii=r� alld l' est•ing material
f 1:., 1' iil JL g i'•`t jy al'U� t»I :L 1',»d i Cats �' '�l as �I rI iV'l IJL. - 1'1_ls i,;'In b,�, t"1 •t. rc-,], •f or% 't-he slope.
pl Lrtt� i:tc`aril 'r7'l: ,�,n the sf et•cl'"I is a sup � est•i,:.,}7 only a1}d
the Plant 1is'l:• �
shouldL„=' lrl�3'k":"� ens ct. �It:}11"}t. !:»,i 1'C'1'1='}"'-ce. By eleceting the It•i%e s c+.nd t
5t"11'ubs t•t,at• will be cl: itipa'(:•ibl+r, with yoart landscape, you aril t.t-1t=
w i l l»:11 i "r t o o,' i l l e r1 „i ci v v,", ' riew home.
r F'.Le:ttst= ('i't= 1 f 1't=t r t•,T, c,.tllt•itc't• me at ctl'ly time if You have any questions
t
1 _
1.1"1cInely
`.i
NO
t 1
J
.. r t ,
T POP %N
L. Pir
i r rI
PP
r� Y,,
P
a > y�fi4 ��iti
JLG,
tg„' 3;'r,h J, t
4-iwl 1s nt.�
it
,
aJ
i 1 rtirt Ci �s Pa
I3 i 1 r tfj)�a'{i it
1
._.
7."1It
..1 i erg s u..+..•..d:•.rteyv �t,n.h%.V<f.4..t+imya4+rb 1't
. ,. r .• -ri . 4j d
t - .. tests } 7
Is Is
It
)`
a
Y
�,J
I
1/V
Ir411••;���al"ItiEI'�f "fC,i i::�: ; ��✓
l ct L, n IeJ)`LIs , GRICLIInIn a1*1S l:I'IdrildCL`1 ,M � c t,t
a ,��tl i� l�iv�,,_,)iiaria 1 I'lictl'I'iitL'C1'(=CK)'` x 5 ili i, ,'�•,•::a-t•t=1. 15 �x
_rL!)11�,1=1"1 ►S SCI:1pullol1'Lirit
Li'tl_IciCarpus dt_IlSi'r 1,»:11"as h,
r xnus riioni't•icola
tl';;.
E,C" to 70 a ,�,4.tpy i 'f c r Et
Clltal x
1 % r't�'u)'lus +.a)''. delor:a.SSEA
CI Fq
to rq /
` k
1='e' 1' I_, C In i ': a Cot CI U 3. t ,::' 1 i L1111 !. I"I at1-1cl ll x ct . Lt . :? h � � ),
O y 1 C ct C ct 1 1. '( �_a i it i C ct ; tii j:
Umbe:I.ILIia1'ia CEt1ifC,1'iticct �i�t C C i it i Llfrt t:�'✓c�t LLlri't
r`
DEC: j!?l Il7t 1'', '-'HFit 1" e
{s4fs'
Artiel�.t1-1c1-tie), �lt..}i'f�,�aia J..:
,t
Ri �F'S 5ct1l��Lll3lt=llrt't FI IJ 1ct�jt=7.�,hus .I ewis1 I. a xt
Cl s rites )',,i rl i s c )' , a x )� rrt i k n „F
�.
too
��a1lcclu`ti�t=1''].ci I`ih.•:ctll��)'`%t ,ct� tt)'Lct Ciix1! ensis rf`
M
Gaul tl--Iet' ia-ha11coral to -
to
L,�j
zv1
�tt
z'ar� &
T) i oo'o •
,, k� %<
c» f st
ZS�wl�;
L
hp
tt
s, I,
J rEr +t
« :K
It
P.
lit.
Mt:
Is
a 1
14 f
Q
r
jo sar i'
S it Ai � ^ n
Is
+t, to
It
�)3'}�1/}arc
rc. 2
atS Y.
to
Is
so
' �'dts a`aryz'�xG'�jr
w
IMF
Olt
r1 f
.'+ar i+a fE. fllt4
a ..1!"'(1 L f4"`tit '11
.. 1, ':.. Y'. •. u . ... iin Ir .w 1 -'r. ly+.... c 4.... a...1•bh .... r ...IAL +... f 1. _ + �4
YR
( #t> >tt^tip'e.p.''u ;7s�Kti�$s`a:
G
.^
�UIEDINN
Nov 51993 ; r
John R. Tissell, P.E. � r
Civil and Shuctural Engineer £Y
22121 Peissner Road S.E. '
Yelm, WA 9859M917
206 894-2125
Lt
October 29, 1993 `,IIf
,If
t
City of Edmonds x.+
,x
Building Department
Plan Review ;
RE: Single Family Permit Application Number 93-165 (Albert and Norma Sand).
J
Mr. and Mrs. Albert Sand have asked me to serve as the "Lead Design Professional'
I have reviewed the geotechnical report by Nelson-Couvrette & Associates dated August
19, 1993. The recommendations of this report are straight forward and have been
incorporated in to the design of the house. In addition, the Sands have been cautioned
` that inspections will be required during the course of construction by myself or by x
Nelson-Couvrette (with reports to me) to confirm that the actual construction conforms
IL
to the recommendations in the geotechnical report and to the details on the approved
house plans.
't
Y
/ � o
John R. Tissell �p�°�l c�°.'�+
6795
SI�IVAL�j1
k , ftES
�x �`It
It
k h is trt
i t i�kry b�SY1`.�i jnw�th
rl .i G1 it
lZ i z
�tjl 7L It
r
L A3,
7N, l I toR�,atz (M�{rrfo�}s
F+h
p9`
4t
ROD
tltVIP
Ole
Zj
John R. Tissell, P.E. ar5
Civil and Stnictural Engineer `
ffS
22121 Peissner Road S.E. '
Yelm, WA 98597=8917
206 894-2125`ujl�lN�,
^C®� Ty s•
iiY !Ain
2 199� i
November 20, 1993 ;
Jeannine Graf
City of Edmonds #$
Building Department
250 Fifth Avenue
Edmonds, WA 98020 f=
Permit A placation Number 93-165 (Albert and Norma Sand).
RE: Single Family P
in on November 19, 1993, I revisited the building site to verify that
Following our meet g
I discussed for ensuring that there would be no earth movement effecting
the ideas that
the neighbors property to the east were appropriate*
I propose being on si
te at the time the basement is dug and examine then wall
° and
excavation as the digging progresses. The excavation will be deepened
liner to allow careful examination and to allow whateevLain th tghere will
systematic mais
necessary to be placed before any sliding can occur. While am c
be no problem, we'll be prepared to take the following action:
the face of the excavation will
In all cases, even if no potential slide planes are a reoen 'rain from causing erosion
be protected with polyethylene sheet material to p
between the time of excavation and back fill.
If a slip plane
is uncovered with a very low potential for sliding, the wall of the
-
if per the enclosed drawing.
excavation will be shore
If any thing is
found indicating a high likelihood of soil slippage, the face of the
excavation will be stabilized by "soil nailing".
John R. Tissell, PE
Enclosure, drawing
�E h
e
,,.. rj
i ... ]j,
"[1
41
11'3 L " ,,it•'i3'" ErlO
91
€ ht 4<
i
• dnac?' Sal ,l rvty Y°
�; a
,1 -
r'
r
`( '*
Ir i:.:i; r -: . .': i' /. t`'•. aid,• :,`—• .,.'t, I .... .. rNi
!'• a• Rj 4r^, tf
;1
Vol
_ Y .(•
i
IN t IN
NO
4
tl
? x .
nt'tle
aM1All
-' t'
4 rIN
Ilt
srI''
V At
r VAC �• s IN
a
I' f
Syr r p,I /
1 30, Cot
�'�F'%
J
y v..
ti
pil es
ft
C. i cis E� t.--r y ; rk
f k ti t.
r
/ aL
•rf,t r
•am,
J
19 h ,
9
x?s
'err
T?r5��ii,
n
J
> t
T
Is IN
r %• .11
fi
43
>ir�f
3kb^ r r
6795
GI �S TD ,RE: , Ss,+r,. •
NAt.�G; SS o
w
FL
XPIRESy/nM1'
/-3u..q -fa��v.•
5r
f.
- r�}{Y
- N, t :
}awe}
tX
r �
GN.
Wr' IN,
j a4Y'pld>' ri''�41��•
to
KIN,
y0y,aN,
JMSA
IN
pop
k i
•
�.�Xf -a1T J Jri fi § r
,
,
r
�hf .
John R. Tissell, P.E.
Civil and Structural Engineer rlrLI
'
22121 Peissner Road S.E. f'*
DEC ��� �
Yelm, WA 98597-8917 2 8 �g93
206 894-2125 Wi
V
p�RMir CpUM E rj
December 22, 1993,,,
t a '
9°
tIL
d 7
• ,�
City of EdmondsrY�
Community Services Department Et�z.•
tr
Building Division `,4
250 Fifth Avenue },
dmonds, WA 98020
tiar,
RE: Single Family Permit Application Number 93465 (Albert and Norma Sand). ; !
4f
At the request of the builder, I visited the site today, and checked soil conditions at each
of the many footings.
..)';
The soil visible in the sides of the excavations made for the footings indicated that all
were replaced on undisturbed soil, below the original. grade of the lot, before the fillings
&.t{
had started.
rig:
The footing are being constructed in a manner that equals or exceeds the requirements'
of the plans.
- tfAJ
jj
Y��•j,
1{1
John R. Tissell PE
}2n
cc Al Sand, Ken Andersen Const. �.x
r,�5
y}fi
4C-wi:
..�
fit
.
([
t,
Lf,s
rar
:u6
y.
1., ,,. r.... .., :., ._i
�APFr.lr14. t 4 T W
kS Qy }uIf
y
4. t r���ftf
P'k,
w
r ani well .:
Vff#aka^,
�r
J
rr;
LANDAU CITY
ASSOCINrES,
INC. DECEIVED SEP2 Q �!�
Geoenvironmental Engineering and Technologies iJ��3
DEC - G_ 1901
p eN 9941T901
::,,,, ; DEFT'
City of Edmonds
250 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Attention: Mr. Ed Somers
Associate City Planner
RE: GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS
PROPOSED SAND SHORT SUBDIVISION
18114 88TH AVENUE WEST
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
In accordance with your request, we have completed a geotechnical review of the
proposed Sand short subdivision. The project is located southwest of the intersection of 88th
Avenue West and Olympic View Drive in Edmonds, Washington.
A geotechnical report prepared by Couvrette Geotechnical Engineering (Couvrette) for
Albert and Norma Sand, dated June 13, 1991, was submitted for review. A site Plan showing
site topography and the proposed subdivision scheme was presented in the geotechnical report.
However, plans showing proposed grading, site drainage, location and design of retaining,
structures, or other related features were not provided at the time of our review.. A brief site
reconnaissance was conducted on October 17, 1991 by a geotechnical engineer from our firm to
observe surficial conditions described in the geotechnical report.
The purpose of our review was to determine if the findings,, conclusions, and
recommendations presented in the geotechnical report adequately characterize site conditions.,
appropriately address the planned development scheme, and are consistent with, the
requirements set forth in City Ordinance 2661. Our evaluation and comments are restricted to
geotechnical concerns and related issues.
Our understanding of the proposed project is based on information provided in the
Couvrette geotechnical report. According to that report, the short subdivision .will create four
residential lots, two in the northern portion of the property and two in the southern portion.
As presently drawn, the northern lots will be accessed from Olympic View Drive and .the
southern lots will be accessed from 88th Avenue West. Site development will apparently involve
cutting and filling on all four lots, with potentially significant filling proposed for portions of the
P.O. BOX 1029 • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020-9129 • (206) 778-0907.• FAX (206) 778-6409
xd �Tl"T
• �117�,`Lrr��fpth 1y°
l iy t yypY11't'ay fit"
fin
t•�F��3t1(a,f r,�,;'
, �• �fyY7 1 1 t, �,,,4;
of
�•
M
i
v'Pr1
op
IP
y✓J to
w,! r—t-..,er-
�F`Of p •y i
f , �'l..L
' VI
d'J4�'rI
northern lots. According to the report, the applicant apparently expects some grading of each , Fd,
- 1vr+
r;,4
lot to be accomplished by the individual home builder.
Our site reconnaissance was conducted from the streets along the east and north edges {1y4s11}
"I {itT 14
of the property. While most of the site was visible from those streets, features over the extreme
Southwestern portion of the property were not observed during the reconnaissance. General site frl*5F'{
rta,
topography, vegetation, and surficial features were noted.+
A
Where observed, site topography, vegetation, and surface conditions are generally asr
described in the geotechnical report. The property encompasses the upper branch of a relatively
steep drainage ravine which extends northwest to Puget Sound. An approximatelyll5 ft highr1
�(3 t
fill embankment supporting Olympic View Drive separates the property from the lower portion
. 'Fr t4Fr
of the ravine. Drainage originating upslope or within the property is channelled by a culvert {t
through the embankment. Some wet areas were observed onsite along the middle and lower2 ,a,r
portions of the ravine at the time of our visit.'°'"
F ,lt
�( r
The ravine extends downward from the southeast corner to the northwest corner of the �F
property, with relatively steep sides over most of its length. The ravine ends abruptly at the
=Q ;
southeast corner of the property, indicating that the ravine may have extendedfurther upslope ti}A
No;
and may have been filled during development of the existing residential area to the south and ,r j
east. Water was not observed within the upper portion of the ravine at the southeast corner ofy,,
y (4
i1 n
the property during our reconnaissance. Consequently, the wet areas observed in the ravine ,KYF
probably were the result of groundwater seepage within the property.
t,
The Couvrette geotechnical report is identified as preliminary in nature. Discussion and
recommendations are included in the report related to site preparation and grading, structural ,
fill, shoring and temporary cuts, foundation and slab support, retaining walls, and geogrid';'
reinforced soil. Findings and recommendations presented in the report are based on near -surface j.
conditions encountered in eight relatively shallow test pits excavated by a backhoe. The test pits
were logged by an unidentified geologist subcontracted to Couvrette. �s
While specific site development plans were not available at the time the report was
particularly those relating to f
prepared, most of the recommendations are quite specific, p y g ;r
foundation and slab support, lateral earth pressures, and placement of structural fill. However,
.I
several issues which may also be of concern are not addressed. These issues include temporary
and permanent cut and fill slopes, control of groundwater seepage, placement of fill over
potentially unstable soil or possible seepage zones, and sequencing site development, including
the installation of common versus lot -specific improvements.
12/06/91 EDMONDS\SANDSHOR.LET 2
LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC.
_ ... _
IN
47
41
rr
_ s It,:"'fit .(F+'•?.r
- t� `4•iti Fr rttl t t( -
s n,{'•.
i
to
too I too
.r — '„r.•.:- —' '
to
i.,.. .. ... ,. .......:. ...^ �.. ..... �. ,..... .. ,, vJv 5!..y v 1 �Y
,.,^z . . .. n . ,. _ ... +. Etttr ,3 P.. 1 �41SI .')%v.,ru..is.✓1 hN.1. )N. fl.zt4Ft'ti
�.
Ai ,I it IM.
,o t
to Conditions described on the test pit logs appear to be consistent with geologic and hydro -
geologic conditions within the vicinity of the property. These conditions typically include
deposits of glacially consolidated silt with weathered and fractured zones, deposits of glacially
derived granular soil, and perched groundwater and seepage zones. A surface mantle. of
variable thicknesses of fill, slope wash, and/or slide debris is also typically found in the area.
The test pit logs provide limited information regarding the overall stratigraphy for what
is a relatively steep property. However, it is our opinion that conditions described on the logs too
clearly indicate that portions of the property have been unstable in the past, and that conditions
presently exist which could lead to future instability. The report does not specifically address
existing overall site stability nor does it fully address the impact of anticipated development on
site stability or the stability of adjacent properties.
As described on the logs, the silt encountered on the property is generally fractured, with
zones of significant jointing and slickensided surfaces. Evidence of shearing and landsliding
within the fractured silt was reported on the logs for Test Pits 1, 5, 7, and 8. Some of the jointed •
zones were described as wet. The report describes shallow slide scarps along the south property
line and a possible slide area at the location of Test Pit 4. `
According to the logs, groundwater seepage was noted between approximate Elevations
240 and 254. During our site visit, moisture was observed in the drainage ravine below an
elevation estimated at about 240 ft. The presence of horsetails on most of the property suggests
a year-round, near -surface groundwater condition.
Considering the above described conditions, it is our opinion that the site is subject to
potential future instability and, therefore, most provisions of Ordinance 2661 should be applied
to the property. Since the geotechnical report does not specifically address overall site stability
or the full impact of site development on slope stability, we recommend that the ,geotechnical .
engineer provide a complete assessment of overall site stability. As provided in the Meadowdale
Site Evaluation Checklist, Geotechnical Report Guidelines, the report should "contain the ,
geotechnical engineer's opinions, conclusions, and recommendations on the present stability of
the site; the stability during construction; and the stability after the proposed development is
completed." The Guidelines further require that the "geotechnical engineer's opinion should be
stated in terms of percentage of risk at each of the above stages of development and the.potential
for damage to abutting properties."
12/06/91 EDMONDS\SANDSHOR.LET 3
LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC.
4"rr.'ft 4er'F r ?ItM1 ''
a�rX r `
- 1(•'11
,1J
t
tot
S 1:, r 1 tia hf fF.
i
' r tFA
. ♦ p � ,1:.:. :l. Y.�... _ i.....iiP4i1;!Ri�.�..)...wii W..Madlf4>1 i;i
Much of -Ordinance 2661 is directed at the Meadowdale Landslide area, which has been'1
previously mapped for types of landslides and probability of future landslide movement.. The
?rF .
subject site has not been so mapped;.hence, the type(s) of possible landslides and their percent ; peti
A€'
probability of future movement have not been clearly_ established. While the proposed x
development does not appear to justify a comprehensive "Meadowdale" type of study, the "Y
x.
applicants' geotechnical engineer must, at a minimum, establish and document the following
1) the type(s), depth(s) and lateral dimensions of existing landslides; 2) the approximate ages);
A'
of the slides (in a relative sense); 3) what, if anything, has been done to modify and/or stabilize
existing landslides; and 4) the relative risk of future movement before, during, and after site
development (both common improvements and site -specific work). Test borings, including ;;
piezometers, will probably be required to properly address these issues.
Issues pertaining to slope stability are the primary geotechnical concerns at this site.
Specific comments regarding these and other issues follow:
1. Site grading will require temporary and permanent cuts and fills for house pads and
access drives. Recommendations regarding temporary and .permanent slope ,:
inclinations should be provided by the geotechnical engineer. Of particular lti5
importance are acceptable inclinations for cuts made in the fractured silt and
overlying fill or slide debris found over portions of the site. Cut quantities need to
be provided. ,`
k
2. Fill placement during preparation of house pads and access drives could occur over
-4
potentially unstable soil. Recommendations for fill placement should include
identification of subgrade soil conditions suitable for accepting ,fill and should
discourage sidecast filling. Fill quantities need to be provided.
3. In steep slope areas, control of surface water drainage and groundwater is particularly
important. The Couvrette geotechnical report provides recommendations for drainage
r
behind subgrade walls and roof drainage, including recommendations that subgrade
drainage systems be tightlined to appropriate collection and disposal systems and that
roof drainage be independently routed by tightline to appropriate discharge LpointS
down slope. Specific drainage provisions for dealing with proposed cuts and fills
r
have not been provided. While exact placement of these drains, if required, may have
to be accomplished during construction, the project plans must identify the types) of
drains (i.e., french, horizontal) and approximate extent. Potential dewatering effects
of such drains on neighboring properties must be evaluated.
We recommend that the City require the submittal of complete Grading and Drainage
t°
Plans for this development. The plans must clearly identify "common" versus "lot -specific"
improvements. The location and interaction of planned cuts, fills, retaining structures, erosion
control measures, placement of driveways, and surface and subsurface drainage provisions `
12/06/91 EDMONDS\SANDSHOR.LEr 4
LANDAU ASSOCIATES. INC.
; N k:
r'} 1 il�d r
LF
A.
- �ASr t. 3tr-• .kr t
,t
CITY COPY
NELS0NmC0UVRET01*wE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ; �x
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS `urn'
SaC�4
17311-135th Ave. NE, A•500 Snohomish County (206) 794,4332 '
Woodinville, WA 98072
(206) 486-1669 • FAX 461.2510 Wenatchee/Chelan (509) 784-2756 c'
,1z;*
Hill
r
N
NOV �OS1999
Yy�Si
to
August 19, 1993
w:
4 .fC
Albert and Norma Sand
4015 m 164th SW, Unit 26 W
Lynnwood, Washington 98037 it
r y't
Gcotecluiical Consultation
Residential Site Plan Review
Edmonds, Washington
NCA File No. 109093 3
lid
Dcar Albert and Norma: rt
This letter presents our conuncuts on. the review of plans for your residence on Lot 3 of your *short plat in
the City of Edmonds. We have provided gcotechnical consultation for the development of the short plat, r,;,
the results of which arc sununarizcd in our report and supplemental letter to you dated June 13, 1991 and O7
February 5, 1992, respectively. We understand that the City of Edmonds has requested us to review the
current site plan with respect to our original report and recommendations.
We were provided an untitled copy of the short plat showing existing and future contours. The location of „
the building and yard contour was penciled on the plan in red. The future yard grade will be about
elevation 230. This will require the lower portion of the lot to be filled as outlined in the original short plat,
with sonic additional fill placed to level the area. The total depth of fill on this lot will approach 20 feet in s
depth along the western border. To achieve the site grade, a cut will be required along the cast property ,y
line. You have informed us that the cut will only be a maximum of 4 feet in height. The main floor of the
residence will be about elevation 233. A basement is planned with an estimated floor elevation of 223:
The basement will extend under the entire house. A garage is to be located on the southeast corner of the
house and will be partially supported on the basement wall fill.
afyi"z�j'ryt
cr .F iaoTr f zrr`tr;
rr2 •
Ur uS?f' t , 5.r yts•
It fi
�._ .l
_ ram.^." �•a--^^.'^' t '�...✓^' '.Y f.
1 4 h
r , t H 1 r I '` L S `, •ri�%n �,x}(�h j,.i
�.. a. +. .. ..•.vn vr'. fir. F. ,. ;.•. .. i!.. ..f�`. r,.a 1. ,i: „4..._... .,. *.. :ir•u!t_•_,
vd
Albert and Norma Sand
Residential Site Plan Review
August 19, 1993 �y,Y
NCA File No. 109093
Pagc 2
:IV
The fill has not been placed on site to date. We understand that the fill, which' will consist of borrow'
material, is expected to be from the local area and will be free of debris and organic material. It is not
intended that the fill be placed and compacted to engineering specifications.
We have reviewed the plans and our previous work, and have prepared the following comments: ,Pr i
1. For the most part the elevations of the basement foundations will be or near bearing soil depth
when excavated. The foundations for the western portion of the house will probably have to extend IV
deeper to reach the proper bearing depth. We rcconunend that we be retained to evaluate the
bearing soils at the time of construction. °
2. The excavation for the cast foundation wall will be approximately `12 to 14 feet below the existing
ground surface. We do not expect this to cause instability that would effect the neighbor's house to f
the cast. However, we would not be surprised if the excavation face did slough and cxtcnd onto the
neighbor's property.
3 Although we do not expect instability that would effect the neighbor's house, we would take some
precautions. These precautions would include having us evaluate the soils exposed in the cut at the
time of excavation, photo documenting the neighbor's house for cracks and signs of distress (take
continuous pictures, even if distress is not observed at this time), and monitoring the house for
settlement.
4. Since the fill to be placed on site is not to be compacted to engineering standards, we recommend
that the final fill slope not exceed 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). Sidewalks 'should be suitably
reinforced and "hinged" to reduce the effects of airy differential settlement. We strongly ,
recommend that the fill placed below the garage slab be placed in uniforni lifts and compacted. It
is a common occurrence to get settlement of garage slabs on basement wall backfill.
5. Proper wall backdrains should be installed around the perimeter of the structure. The drains
should be located a minimum of 6 inches below the bottom of the interior floor slab. We
recommend that the drains consist of 4 inch rigid PVC pipe encased in pea gravel. Free draining
sand and gravel should extend up the back of the wall until 1 foot below the ground surface. The
underlying soils should not be expected to infiltrate any water that can enter the area. It would be
additional "insurance" to place a blanket of pea gravel under the basement slab to allow drainage.
This blanket should be outlet to the foundation drain on the western side of the structure. A plastic L.
vapor barrier should be placed under the slab.
NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
_..- � h
lY �fYl LfljJ.y�47
b ry Y.
tit
Vt
r}� aAL
1
M
y
5
.-...r-_ ,.�.•Yn.�,. .M1'f��.'L�i'�f. �.a.n 1... .. '+...�..n�.�v .. . yy.�1Ja
IN
.. J.....rd! , ..:,.�,.zINN.., ..!°... . .... I sI .._.... •'`'.....:.1, ; .:;s',te.+, _..Ie£...,rw,..eau^iLl•4u3,{v7tf:ipp
l'`t�1' �,i
1 s
IN
14
Albert and Norma Sand
ILA
r
Residential. Site Plan Review
August 19,1993_
NCA File No. 109093
Page 3
" 4t
b<'
,.
s
We trust that this letter meets your needs at this time. If you • have any questions or require further ti•
information, please call.
Sincerely,
NELSON-COWRETTE &ASSOCIATES, INC:
44 _
5
'49
qr ,
t
r
-. kITY R
CLERK 13 19,g BUILDINQ ;
CIVIC CENTER
lr�M�wt�s, WA 98020 JAN 4
COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS X
F
®yy Under the review procedures established.pursuant to the. State
Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City.
;
1 ,,,
= t
of Edmonds and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building
- , . prere Y.Y
permit for the construction of a residential structure and
attendant facilities the undersigned OWNERS' of property
� . g pro ert do
hereby covenant•, stipulate and promise as follows: ytf�Y
1. Description cf S•: b ject Property. This c:. vrenant ci
,VV
notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tractk},
of land at the street address of /8�06 490 A ��. f'4rJ
. (insert
street address), Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington and x
p �
F rf,
legally described as: °?
rra
Lot 3: That portion of Tract A, according to the plat of DOBSON PARK, as
recorded in Volume 16 of plats on pages 96 and 91 recor of
,1
Snohomish County, WA, as described in EXHIBIT B attachedc:�m
C1 rYl
at:
—1 'xi
,
::1
2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above
referenced site '(hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area,
which has lieen identified by the City of Edmonds as having a
potential for earth subsidence .or landslide hazard. The risks
associated with development of the site have been evaluated by
a fry
technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant -as a
part of the: process to obtain a•building permit for the subject
site. The results of the consultant'•s reports and evaluations of
WSS52079A/0006_040.034 _1_ RE IVE® `.
WSS/klt 02/08/90 BUILDING 'tf
'4 !Y
.: NOV
0 8 1993
. ,
• F 9 - 0q
�t
voL.
Ao� - MIT COUNTER 0TER
.. ....
t
U
284
.. ilf titl iA {
J( YC ifs
'tt,
c+lt4t'ri.
y ✓ T
at.t-
r 11pA-.f
J
Af
,t..,
WTI
,
1 — :'^-•�� +.-.,. ,y_••,,,.. y� �n.-�� I ..-+w^+.-._....-.„y.....r�-++•:..rr.kn•.,•r+�...'...y �ue�.
401
the risksassociatedwith development are contained in building
%3C) 395
permit file number tis,-- (insert number) on file with the
City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or•'
prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance
with the recommendations of the consultants in the course of
permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions
may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or,
lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth
stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated
changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and
conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer,
geologist, architect and/or, structural engineer are hereby
incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully
as if herein set forth_ Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or
any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an 'interest. in
the property is put on notice of the -existence-of the content of
the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may
be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at.,
the Planning Department, City of Edmonds, 505 Bell Street•,
Edmonds, iashington 98020.
30 Indemnification and Hold %Harmless. The undersigned
OWNERS hereby waive any and all' liability associated.,with
development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of
all risks associated with development of the. property and dog:,'
therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action
against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees
WSS52079A/0006.040.034' -2-
WSS/klt 02/08/90
2'�0 �S. VOL 28. 4PacE:��
,
jp
}
ivar
IA+ 4YRP\}4>1 11'iiJ
rvF
__-...
,. v—_•. r
��'- x ]
Y! .�:� �•?o >�!`Y.! t t!YA*'[.. ✓rr.-'4 3ii�4 ki �r^i.S 1. 41,
of{c fi,L
Fl
L
arising from and out of such development. In addition, the
,.
;,
r
OWNERS on behalf of themselves, -their successorsin interest, d
heirs and ,assignees, do hereby promise. to indemnify and hold
harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees `f,
from any loss, claim, liability .or damage of any kind or nature
to persons or property either on or, off the site resulting from
or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or
out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of
the site, or 'occurring or arising out of any false, misleading;
or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their
employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance
of the building permit_
NY
4,. Insurance Requirement., In addition to any bonding which
;r
may be required during the course of development, the Community., ..
Services Director %/has not (strike one) specifically required :r
the maintenance of an insurance policy *for public liabilityNo
' i
coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in'•4order
to provide for the financial responsibilities established through
the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above..
41
(insert insurance requirements and time period,
if any --if no insurance required, so state.]
No insurance required. or I
WSS52079A/0006.040,.034 —3—
WSS/klt 02/08/90 `� '�
o VOL .2�GE.��`��
3121 6 Ql'.�� too :1
_ _ ..� ....�+-..-I-..:.....--r-err•-,- .-rr rr..-.-'F ,r x
r.
doto
o
o° ,fit' ��r$sM ,>
rY%4PaL4
N ALG�f I$R 11
Lot
;2 rwuk.y P'�5�7S�
c.� b)41
y
�11 M14
,Y
If
rL
fr'Yje Y`�t{14y+ j
r�l}lplY rli
pp {
aIN a
'NOW4 � No :iNo
It
No N
,f
o No
No o
IN 0
fN
,r.
f
IN
5. Covenant to'.Touch and Concern the Land. This, covenant
of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and
,y •
concerns the subject tractandshall run with the land, binding,
obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs;
a
successors and 'interests or, any other person or entity acquiring
an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This11
provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or
lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss
No
nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above
No 9
.'
required.
1 .,'t /
I s DONE this o day of 1993
yV pl
No 4
or NNo No
'EY .y3Yw^+' Y \ ,; OWNER(S)
I SNo2No NJ
rfi(10 L"440P
F"�a,4too 1 By
r.. hygNot, f
NO
� �1c'�'�, <r; t i j
i'i ; S ,rN1�
Rj
jd 1y1\ f'
L. �+ivya Not . Rr y.h ./ By �A/L.
r s
it AI L
$ 1,
No I
-
k�9 By
to W
a 5T'SrF'r+ v i -
t
r
i a a e iFNN
-
�i r d tt la '4 t
4- ,Ar oo- 1% 1 r , r 'ntext 1�, STATE OF WASHINGTON
L`l i'S7 t i ,e1 y`'FtY`t rr '�F'1 J t i
7
1
COUNTY OF I No
of k
I certify that I know or have: satisfactory evidence
that / 4 SA Aft signed this instrument and acknowledged',
WSS52079A/0006.040.034 -4-
WSS/klt 02/08/90 L I L L.. I r r
'
Von "24P�cNo
;
---____ +.
�...
Now
... — — ,Y'2'4'soliklj,lh' 14j
.
y4:,,"ft Sa,2 t
r rNo N No r
C,rfi'-i.}i}g9,"tJ"io ,'•et
G't a tt r t4�1"
I P1
No
P No
IN L
�r1r 13 rLj',sAt
< INfi No
L
No, Jx 'F
ti No
w�.S
' yi 4 F L
3 s .rf? i nryi
P to .1 1 �'Siti}
;n, r13 t�F,ti 3j* i .
3I No
r .k',r srr
4
7 d
ti
t a
1 i l S i.. .
bC '
V
f 4
I If
It
V tii�Ll li/i1} f
it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act fort` th�.�` ,�,9. ;s
Off
mentioned in this instrument. r
Q • •7 .0. ,� 1, r'IL4f
DATED this U day of �'� , 1993 r,'•v�`
t, 1
K
1 7 ^y . .ih,.
NOTARY PUBLIC `
My commission expires:
::,
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss _ f}
COUNTY .OF )
1 •}
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence
"4
that dtol %� SAS signed this, instrument and acknowledged
i ff
it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the,If-,,ilp�►�ses
1 ya ,
mentioned in this instrument. ♦;,�`�ot .• ��`� r wry ;.
J
3�� � mj,, -ri,' 'rr,rta iµ/ , cL S = - $ �t,�� ` • r.. Z
199.
DATED this C/ day oft-�rccif�,/� _.
�'r in {4' 't4A 6 Cxftl`ti s"K 4 r 'iIkk
/ : •' 441. •• ���/ �� j j' C� • ~^ .i I.r
It
NOTARY PUBLIC a
M commission expi es:
V.,, r f }[it STATE OF WASHINGTON 11
, ) ss
was COUNTY OF )
4 , V.
$ {4s L 1 !
\
3
5,; I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence
e .t4 J
N 1
that signed this instrument, on oath
,IF1
stated that .(he/she) - was authorized to execute the
M'Lti"G".`4 YiSrlrki4
r<� title
Lt �" instrument and acknowledged it as the (title)
+Wd.4 WJII ,
17Tj �'
of (name of party on behalf of whom 'instrument
,
°p[di."i,° ir'nl. L t oyl nt rl r u' j 1 -
Ny was executed)• to be the free and voluntary act of such party for
{
the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
DATED this day of , 199_.`
NOTARY. PUBLIC
My commission expires: .
g� / j _
WSS52079A/0006.. 040. 034 .5- VOL V ` p��� ►
WSS/klt : 02 108/90
i h _ p y
p'Tln..-ni+.••ir, rrrrrrN1+.—.�.Tr�•'�"'rt. r4 .
rI,Y rru '4+4
■
nik,tri •e
O l0w V. . cn Cn -PbW N 1� CDl0 co V Ol Ul Wi;7 Of
f
o u
Of
m m
c-O) COO)
m m
MOO I't
i'.
_ `r-01
r a
a a r
m m I�
0
fc
{.•
a
A W W W W W W W W W W N' N N N N N N N N
O l0 m V cn U7 -ob W N F-+ O kD 00 V Ol : (M •? W
m
m m (n r
(n 3
IV -
m� 1
WOO
ec
m
m k
w
m
m m !>.
C7
Cb
v
I
}
n - J
-_.....
k r 4p.
I I Od
f
t!011
i
Yvyh4 �r i l �
r, Or
.h05`,.
Of
1
.. _. `
IT -
is ! .. ' --- ._•. _ ...-.__..
ITT, I
TV
C•. ,_
IT
RECORD OF INSPECTIONS
.1, ITTINSPECTOR DATE APPROVED
SMACKS ..................
FOUNDATION:41�
N>►�..6. Footing........:.
Wall.. ...... /�?/G1% ✓ �z�(r gY
�C
BTctlled2s 1
Pier/Porch ............. e
Retaining Wall.....
�•� Slab Insulation............ ,»
,q PLUMBING:
it
Underground.......
Rough -In
y;5 �/�
Comm ercialFinal, ;:.. .
..
TILT
• Igo •�� �5 HEATING: .� l
Gas Test .............�S
TV I TV
meL In
7-77
TVI
IT
INT
Gas Pi in
C
Commercial Final
EXTERIOR SHEATHING"
NAILING-, .,
FRAMING ...
.INSULATION: -
1 ,
Floo Insulation " ` k� "'
�.7
Wall Insulation ...
a—
_
Ceiling Insulation. ,
i ....••
'- 3'y , 4`
.::. w
', - SHEETROCK NAILING .... +
i _ --�',
SPECIAL INSPECTION
+
s i 5 TTTII
y �`
TI
II
RADON MONITOR AT SITE
1;,., FINAL APPROVAL
FOR OCCUPANCY..........
---
1
o ll
i
ITTI
IT
IT
-T.
SQ-'r R\z
IT
T lie
I _
IT IT
If
i Y..
♦t..