Loading...
10/20/1992 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES October 20, 1992 THESE MINUTES WERE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 27, 1992 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Laura Hall at the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds. The City Council meeting was preceded by a flag salute. PRESENT Laura Hall, Mayor Jeff Palmer, Council President Steve Dwyer, Councilmember Michael W. Hall, Councilmember William J. Kasper, Councilmember John Nordquist, Councilmember Tom Petruzzi, Councilmember Absent 1� Councilmember Dave Earling (Councilmember Earling previously notified C�✓41Sf attending a Community Transit function as th STAFF Art Housler, Admin. Services Dir. Brent Hunter, Personnel Manager Bob Alberts, City Engineer Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor Buzz Buzalsky, Fire Chief Scott Snyder, City Attorney Rhonda March, City Clerk Barb Mehlert, Recorder e Mayor Hall and Councilmembers recessed to an Executive Session at 7:01 p.m. to discuss a legal matter and reconvened in Council Chambers at 7:22 p.m. As Councilmember Petruzzi said he would like to add a 20 minute item to the agenda to discuss the Mayor's itemized budget adjustments, COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETRUZZI, TO ADD "DISCUSSION ON BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS" FOLLOWING ITEM 7. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items (B), (C) and (D) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER DWYER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, FOR APPROVAL OF THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved Consent Agenda items are as follows: (A) ROLL CALL (E) AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TREES FOR REFORESTATION AT PINE RIDGE PARK FROM FAR PASTURES TREE FARM FOR 100 WESTERN RED CEDAR ($2,109.90) AND LEO CLARK ARLINGTON HEIGHTS TREE FARM FOR 100 DOUGLAS FIR ($2,164.00) APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, AND MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 1992 (Item (B) on (rV C C• the Consent Agenda COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETRUZZI, TO APPROVE THE DRAFT MINUTES a Y,5 OF OCTOBER 10 AS SUBMITTED AND THE OCTOBER 13 DRAFT MINUTES WITH THE CORRECTIONS NOTED IN COUNCIL PACKETS. MOTION CARRIED with Councilmember Nordquist and Councilmember Kasper abstaining as they were not present for the October 13, 1992 Council Meeting. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS WARRANTS FOR WEEK OF OCTOBER 12, 1992 (Item (C) on the Consent Agenda Council President Palmer referenced an entry in the warrants for a cellular phone for the Mayor's car. Council President Palmer said although this is an unbudgeted item, he believes there are benefits for providing that equipment to the Office of Mayor if it is her intent to make herself more accessible to the Staff and Councilmembers. Mayor Hall replied affirmatively. Council Presi- dent Palmer asked Mayor Hall, in light of the drop in revenues and the expense cuts that are being made, if she believes this is the best use of funds. Mayor Hall replied affirmatively, as she stated she has saved the City many dollars. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUN- CILMEMBER DWYER, TO APPROVE ITEM C. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SIX -LOT PLAT OF JANRIS ESTATES IN THE 7800 BLOCK OF 175TH ST. S.W. (APPLICANT: JANRIS CONSTRUCTION/PAUL THOMPSON/FILE NO. P-92-10) Item D on t e Consent Agenda COUNCILMEMBER DWYER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM D. MOTION CAR- RIED with Councilmember Petruzzi abstaining as his property is located approximately 300 feet from the project and did not completely partake in previous discussions for that reason. AUDIENCE As no member of the audience wished to come forward, Mayor Hall closed the audience portion of the meeting. Mayor Hall recognized in the audience, Don Stay, Port Commissioner, and Port Executive Director, Bill Stevens. MEETING WITH EDMONDS PORT OFFICIALS , Don Stay, Port Commissioner, brought the Mayor and Council up to date on Port activities. Mr. 64 Stay said the new breakwater is now 101 completed. Mr. Stay said the decision to replace the breakwater versus repairing the breakwater has been validated as much of the old rock crumbled in the pickup process. Mr. Stay advised the Council that some time in the future, the City may have a problem with the location of the fishing pier, as the foundational pier rests on the breakwater, and is not bedded below the rocks. Mr. Stay reported the Port is very pleased with the Edmonds Visitors Bureau and is considering an increase in funding to the Bureau. Mr. Stay reported the Fur Breeders have agreed to move' their facility from the present location no later than December, 1993, and noted a price settlement has not yet been reached. Mr. Stay reported the Port is currently remodeling their facilities, which will meet ADA requirements, and said the remodeled meeting room could be made available to the City and the various Boards. Mr. Stay said the Port is very pleased with the working relationship and the cooperation it has received from the City. HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF "SKOGERSON LANE" 7-LOT SUBDIVISION AT 20709 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE APPLICANT: WARREN MURPHY/WILLIAM SKOGERSON/FILE NO. P-92-46 Staff Report and Recommendation Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor, said on October 20, 1992, the Hearing Examiner held a hearing on the proposed preliminary subdivision of approximately 2.21 acres of land into seven single family lots on property located at 20709 Maplewood Drive. The subject property is located within an RS-12 zone. On September 3, 1992, the Hearing Examiner issued his report recommending approval of the application subject to conditions outlined in his report. On September 28, 1992, an adja- cent property owner, Mr. Fahey, submitted a letter to the City Council regarding concerns he raised relating to the proposed Plat. The issue raised in the letter from the adjacent property owner relates in some manner to both the preliminary plat, which is the subject of the present hearing, and the variance, which is not the subject of this hearing. Specifically, Mr. Fahey wishes to express his desire that the trees which currently exist on the north property of the proposed Lot 1 be retained as a buffer from the new plat. The subject trees however, are located within the area to be dedicated as a public right-of-way. The issue is further complicated by the fact that if the right-of-way is relocated farther to the south, it reduces the setback of the existing house on Lot 1 from the right-of-way to even a greater degree than requested in the approved variance. Mr. Wilson presented overhead transparencies which showed the entire Plat. Mr. Wilson said as a companion permit, one that is not subject to review, but will be part of the discussion, was the request from the applicant for a variance for the existing residence on Lot 1, adjacent to Maplewood Drive. Mr. Wilson said the Hearing Examiner in the variance application recommended approval of the variance subject to the Council approving the Preliminary subdivi- sion. The necessity of the variance results from the fact that the applicant is installing a new right-of-way along the northern border of the applicant's property between Maplewood Drive and 88th Ave. Council President Palmer asked if the property has been surveyed so a determination can be made as L the location of the trunks of the holly trees. Mr. Wilson said the trees would be be part of the survey as they are not located on the applicant's property. Council President said he is concerned that the trees are the only buffer the adjacent neighbor has, and if they are de- stroyed, that would leave no privacy for that neighbor. It was noted the trees are located in the City's right-of-way. Council President Palmer asked if there was a plan if the trees could not be saved, as Council President Palmer said Chapter 15 of the Edmonds Community Development Code stated that residential privacy is one of the highest goals to be attained. A plan was not re- vealed. Councilmember Petruzzi referenced page 13 of the Agenda Packet where it stated that the variance will be granted only if the Preliminary Plat is approved. City Attorney Scott Snyder said the variance is not currently before the Council, only the preliminary subdivision is. Planning Supervisor Jeff Wilson said the reason he brought up the variance is because the Hearing Examiner said his approval of the variance is conditioned upon Council's approval of the Plat, as if the Plat was not approved, the variance would not be necessary. CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES Page 2 October 20, 1992 Councilmembers discussed the variance criteria and the location of the holly trees. Councilmember Dwyer said he took the Hearing Examiner's decision to mean that the Hearing Examin- er would grant the variance if Council approved the Preliminary Plat, but since the Council has not yet approved the Preliminary Plat, there hasn't been a variance granted. Councilmember Dywer said variances only come before the Council on appeal, so there is no appeal at this time, as the Council is only approving the Preliminary Plat. Councilmember Dwyer said a possible appeal would only come before the'Council from the granting of the variance. City Attorney Scott Snyder af- firmed Councilmember Dwyer's statement. Councilmember Kasper inquired on the location of the sidewalks, and Mr. Wilson said it his impres- sion they would be located on the south side. Testimony of the Applicant Jerry Lovell of Lovell/Sauerland Association, representative, engineer and surveyor for the appli- cant, addressed the concerns of the holly trees. Mr. Lovell said he has been in contact with the adjacent neighbor, Mr. Fahey, concerning the preservation of the holly trees. Mr. Lovell said he and the applicant will do as much as possible to retain the trees, however noted the trees are located in the City's right of way, and said he cannot say for sure if the trees can be saved. Mr. Lovell also addressed a walkway and proposed fencing. Mr. Lovell said the requirement calls for six foot high fencing on each side of the walkway. Mr. Lovell said the applicant objects to this requirement for aesthetic reasons, as well as safety reasons. Mr. Lovell said the applicant would like to agree to fence the applicant's frontage on the walkway. Councilmember Petruzzi inquired on Staff's direction as far as fencing, and Mr. Lovell said the Planning Supervisor said there was no room for change as far as the requirement of a six foot fence on both sides of the walkway. Mr. Lovell said he didn't think the Hearing Examiner's deci- sion dealt with the fencing issue in a clear concise manner. T. V. Myszkowski, 8821 Main Street, neighbor of the proposed project, said he is in favor of the project, however, expressed concerns over the existing foliage, as he feels it is excessive, and would like to see many of the trees in area removed for safety aesthetic reasons. Warren Murphy, 814 Alder Street, developer/owner of the subject property, said he understood the variance wasn't to be discussed tonight. Mr. Murphy said he is in favor of saving as many trees as possible. Mr. Murphy said he is happy to build a fence to Main Street, but does not agree to building a fence on both sides of the walking trail due to safety reasons. Council President Palmer asked Mr. Murphy if he had a plan to provide any kind of solid fence, in case the holly trees cannot be saved in order to provide privacy. Mr. Murphy said that hasn't been discussed as he hopes the holly trees can be retained. Rob King, 10503 88th W. Edmonds, said he has heard no plans for stormwater retention and drains, utility details, and stipulations for the width of the sidewalks. Mr. King said as an interested property owner in the vicinity, he received no public notice of the hearing in the mail. Mr. King said when he built his house, he was given a permit by the City, but was told after that, a mora- torium on building permits for this specific corridor until a stormwater was in place. Mr. King expressed concerns over the City's inspection and compliance process for engineering that is done and approved through the City. Harold Brockman, 19900 89th Pl. W., Edmonds, asked if 88th was going to be extended to 200th. Mr. Brockman asked who would be responsible for paying for the utilities and improvements. Ron Fahey, 20625 Maplewood Drive, expressed concern of a walkway which had a six foot fence on both sides of the trail. Mr. Fahey said this would be a safety concern and would be a terrible mistake. Mr. Fahey said he would like to see the holly trees remain because they are the only buffer he has. As no other member of the audience wished to comment on this subject, Mayor Hall closed the pub- lic portion of the hearing. City Attorney Scott Snyder reviewed the list of questions that were contained in the public por- tion of the hearing, which were answered as follows: With regards to the walkway, Mr. Wilson said the walkway measure was included as a mitigation in the Environmental Determination. Mr. Wilson said in his review, he felt it was the most appropri- ate thing to do to account for the security of the adjacent property owners by providing a fenced CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES Page 3 October 20, 1992 in trail. Mr. Wilson said the SEPA mitigated conditions states to install a minimum 10 foot as- phalt pedestrian trail, and furthermore, the City Ty require the applicant to install a solid wood fence of not more than six feet in height along the entire length of the pedestrian corridor on both the east and west sides of 88th Avenue west. Councilmember Kasper noted the.maximum width would-be 30 feet if you go to the outer edges of the right -of way, and Mr. Wilson concurred. Regarding the extension of 88th, Mr. Wilson said 88th street at this point in time, is not to be developed north, however, it is likely, and it is planned that 88th, as a vehicular right of way will be extended to no farther south than 207th. Regarding the paying of utilities and improvements, City Attorney Scott Snyder said that is the responsibility of the developer. Regarding notification to citizens, Mr. Wilson, Planning Supervi- sor, said hearing notices are sent out to all property owners within 80 feet of the subject project. Regarding building moratoriums in the subject area,. Mr. Wilson said all of the stormwater issues have been adequately addressed in the current project and should cause no prob- lems in the area. City Attorney Scott Snyder said there is a City requirement that moratoriums must be renewed every six months pursuant to a public hearing, and Mr. Snyder said to his knowl- edge he has never prepared an ordinance, nor has a public hearing been held regarding a moratori- um in the past nine years. Mr. Snyder said if a moratorium previously existed, it is no longer in place. Mr. Snyder said the Hearing Examiner's decision indicates that the variance is conditioned on the approval of the Preliminary Plat. Mr. Snyder said the variance comes forward only if appealed. Council President Palmer said it is his understanding that the variance has not been granted until the Council approves the Preliminary Plat. Mr. Wilson said Staff's view of the Hearing Examiner's decision is should the'subdivision not be approved, the variance request is a moot point. Council discussion and deliberation Discussion was held -regarding the issue of the fence surrounding the walkway. Councilmember Kas- per said the people along lot 7 have a right to a six foot fence, however, the. people on the other. side are not even involved at this point, as it is undeveloped property. Councilmember Kasper suggested that Staff shouldn't require .more than a four foot fence, however, if they.want- ed a six foot fence on their property, they should'beable to. Council President Palmer said it bothers him that if the trees are removed, there will be no visual buffer at all between Lot 1 and the property to the north. Council President Palmer said he would like to see a provision where a buffer would be provided if the trees are removed. Council President said there is a five foot sidewalk which runs the length of the street, and he said one of the things the Council can do within that strip is to grant the ability to reduce the width of the sidewalk for that portion down to 3 feet, so there would still be plenty of space for a pedestrian, and at the same time preserve the buffer. It was noted that the trees are on the present City right-of- way. Councilmember Hall said that Staff is working with the involved parties to work out all of the problems, including the buffers. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETRUZZI FOR DISCUSSION, TO ACCEPT THE HEAR- ING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION. Under discussion, Councilmember Petruzzi raised the issue of the fence height.. Councilmember Hall said the people on the west side of the trail seem to want a fence and nobody is telling them they have to build it a certain height up to six feet. Councilmember Hall said the people on the eastern side of the trail might not even want a fence. Regarding the issue of privacy for the people along the pathway, Councilmember Hall said if the property is developed on the eastern side of the fence and the people want a fence, they can put up a fence. Councilmember Dwyer asked Council President Palmer whether the motion addresses his concern, and Council President Palmer replied negatively. Council President Palmer said he would like to allow staff the flexibility to reduce the width of the sidewalk for the length of the Fahey property by two additional feet, to allow the staff more flexibility in citing the center line of the road and potentially saving the vegetation which provides a buffer. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO PERMIT STAFF THE FLEXIBILITY OF REDUCING THE FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT DOWN TO A THREE FOOT SIDE- WALK FOR THE LENGTH OF 207TH WHICH WOULD BE BASICALLY ALONG THE FAHEY PROPERTY. Councilmember Kasper said the City at this time already builds sidewalks inside property lines as long as an easement is taken. Councilmember Kasper said those things can be worked out. Council - member Kasper said there are alot of sidewalks which are two feet inside the property line, and what Council President Palmer is saying is that Staff should do everything they can do,. even if CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES Page 4 October 20, 1992 it means getting an easement from the front of the property, to put two feet of the sidewalk on that property in that side area. Council President said Councilmember Kasper's comments are the intent encompassed in his proposed amendment. THE MOTION, AS AMENDED, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Mayor and Council recessed at 9:10 and reconvened in Council chambers at 9:14 p.m. PRESENTATION BY PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AMENDED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR S R C COUNCIL APPROVAL n ,p �60 Mary McCumber, Executive Director of the Puget Sound Regional Council, said on July 23,1992, the City Council approved the current interlocal agreement establishing the Puget Sound Regional Council. The Regional Council is requesting an amendment to the existing interlocal to comply with new state requirements, which requires the Regional Council to add the Washington State Department of Transportation, the Washington State Transportation Commission, the Port of Seat- tle, the Port of Tacoma, and the Port of Everett to their Executive Board to remain eligible for approximately $660,000 in state planning funds. Ms. McCumber said the new Interlocal Agreement also establishes a new dues methodology. The new dues structure is based on assessed value and population, rather than on the amount of each jurisdictions' general fund, since the makeup of the general fund is not the same for each jurisdiction. Ms. McCumber distributed informational pamphlets to the Mayor and Council which illustrated the vision of the Regopma; Council, as well as the organizational and voting 'structure. Council discussion and deliberation Councilmember Kasper inquired on the weighted vote process. Ms. McCumber said a weighted vote has not yet been called for, but when issues such as the airport decision comes forward, a weighted vote will then probably be called for. Ms. McCumber said it is not true that the Regional Council has a position on the airport issue, as recently reported in the Herald newspaper. Council President Palmer said there is very little the City can do at this point but to approve the amended Interlocal Agreement as the State is basically making the City approve of it, or no dollars will come to the City in the form of federal funding. Council President said it is inter- esting that the State made no provisions for the smaller ports, while provisions have been made for the smaller cities. Council President Palmer said from his read of the document, the weighted votes that the Department of Transportation and Commission has, with 50 weighted votes say a while lot when the Snohomish cities and towns only have 56, so when it comes to this city's de- sires to be able to influence how the Edmonds waterfront is affected by transportation, the City is going to be hard pressed to have any representation at all. Councilmembers expressed dissatisfaction regarding the weighted vote system. Councilmember Petruzzi said the agreement basically eliminates -the City's votes by giving 60 to the Department of Transportation and the Transportation Commission. Council President Palmer said the Department of Transportation and the Transportation Commission are in an excellent position to swing a deal with any other region and any other community in order to get their votes to back whatever position they want to take. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DWYER,. TO APPROVE THE AMENDED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. Under discussion, Councilmember Petruzzi said he would vote in favor of the motion only to show unity of the Council. Councilmember Petruzzi expressed his concern that the rights of -the cities are being taken away and said changes have to be made in Olympia, and said he would lobby for changes, as he feels the city's rights are being ripped apart. Councilmember Dwyer said in defense of the Board of the Regional Council, the City has not.been aided by the State Legislature, and once again the City's interests were not guarded by the legis- lature. Councilmember Dwyer said three years ago, the three legislatures told the City not to worry as they would take care of the City on this issue, which they have not done. Councilmember Dwyer said he does not know how the three legislators voted on this issue, as they didn't even tell the City it was happening. MOTION CARRIED with Councilmember Hall voting no. DISCUSSION OF 1993 COST FOR PROVIDING THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE c Buzz Buzalsky, Fire Chief, said earlier this year, the voters of Edmonds approved a six year EMS C Levy to fund the EMS program for the citizens of Edmonds. The levy allowed the city to levy up to $.45 per thousand of valuation to support the program. Chief Buzalsky reviewed with the Mayor and Council, the projected expenditures for 1993 as to assist the Council in determining the amount to levy in 1993. Chief Buzalsky reviewed the overview of department operating cost for 1991, 1992 CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES Page 5 October 20, 1992 and project cost for 1993, as well as the 1993 projected EMS Budget broken down by line item. Chief Buzalsky recommended that all cost in providing Emergency Medical Services be funded from the EMS Levy. Councilmember Kasper asked Chief Buzalsky if the salary portion, formerly paid by the General Fund, has been removed from the 1993 fire salary budget. Chief Buzalsky said in 1993, the General Fund for the Fire Department is going to be a lot less than it was in 1992. Chief Buzaksly said the entire Fire Department budget was subsidized by General Fund in 1992, so now, it will be reduced and said what ever figure is decided upon for the EMS levy will mandate how much it will be reduced. As a procedural matter, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, TO EX- TEND THE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. Councilmembers discussed and reviewed the figures. Councilmember Dwyer said. what the City wants to do is levy a fair amount that retains the ability for the program to grow in the future within what was authorized by the voters. Councilmember Dwyer said the number to focus on is the $.34 cents, which is the cost of the ongoing elements of the program, which is $11 cents less than what is authorized, which amounts to 75% of the author- ization. Councilmember Dwyer said the question for the Council to answer during the preparation of the budget is on those one time items that the City needs to get their money back on such as election costs and the aid car. Councilmember Dwyer said the decision has to be made whether those costs are recouped during the first.year, over two years, or some other time period. Council President Palmer asked the Mayor what her recommendation for a levy amount for 1993 is and Mayor Hall said she is convinced it is going to take $:40 per thousand of valuation to ade- quately support the program. Council President Palmer said he thinks there is some real justifica- tion for that amount. Councilmembers agreed. Mayor Hall thanked Chief Buzalsky for his presentation. Due to the lateness of the hour, Council President Palmer suggested, with Councilmember Petruzzi's concurrence, to remove the item which Councilmember Petruzzi added as 7.A "DISCUSSION ON BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS" and place it on the October 27 Agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETRUZZI, TO MOVE THE DISCUSSION ON BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO THE OCTOBER 27 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO ELIMINATE ITEMS 9 AND TEN FROM THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION TO 15 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION ON A PERSONNEL MATTER The Councilmembers recessed to a Councilmember only Executive Session to discuss a personnel matter at 10:12 p.m. and reconvened in Council Chambers at 10:19 p.m. At 10:20 p.m., Council President Palmer adjourned the meeting. A PERMANENT RECORDING OF ALL COUNCIL MEETINGS, AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL SIGNED COPY OF THESE MIN- UTES IS ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. 4Laur al Ma or R nda �OMarc , City Clerk CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES Page 6 October 20, 1992 AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL PLAZA MEETING ROOM - LIBRARY BUILDING 7:00 -10:00 p.m. OCTOBER 20, 1992 CALL TO ORDER FLAG SALUTE 1. (15 Min.) EXECUTIVE SESSION ON A LEGAL MATTER 2. (10 Min.) CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 1992 AND MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 1992 (C) APPROVAL OF CLAIMS WARRANTS FOR WEEK OF OCTOBER 12, 1992 (D) FINAL APPROVAL OF SIX -LOT PLAT OF JANRIS ESTATES IN THE 7800 BLOCK OF 175TH ST. S.W. (APPLICANT: JANRIS CONSTRUCTION / PAUL THOMPSON / FILE NO. P-92-10) (E) AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TREES FOR REFORESTATION AT PINE RIDGE PARK FROM FAR PASTURES TREE FARM FOR 100 WESTERN RED CEDAR ($2,109.90) AND LEO CLARK ARLINGTON HEIGHTS TREE FARM FOR 100 DOUGLAS FIR ($2,164.00) 3. AUDIENCE 4. (10 Min.) MEETING WITH EDMONDS PORT OFFICIALS 5. (30 Min.) HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF "SKOGERSON LANE" 7-LOT SUBDIVISION AT 20709 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE (APPLICANT: WARREN MURPHY/WILLIAM SKOGERSON/FILE NO. P-92-46) 6. (20 Min.) PRESENTATION BY PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AMENDED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 7. (20 Min.) DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED 1993 COSTS FOR PROVIDING EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 8. (30 Min.) COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSION ON A PERSONNEL MATTER (Council Members Only) 9. (5 Min.) MAYOR 10. (15 Min.) COUNCIL THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE ACCESSIBLE FOR THE DISABLED (An Interpreter for the hearing impaired is available with 24 hours advance notice to the City Clerk at 771-0245)