bld20110479-Echelbarger-SFR-E3-REVISED.pdf
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
(425) 771-0220
City Website: www.edmondswa.gov
DATE: January 10, 2012
TO: Jerry O’Connell
JerryO@lsaengineering.com
FROM: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager
RE: Plan Check #: bld20110479 - REVISED
Project: Echelbarger – SFR Addition
Project Address: 620 Sunset Ave
During review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information,
corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit three (3) sets of revised
plans/documents with a written response to each of the items below to Marie Harrison.
City of Edmonds handouts and standard details can be referenced on the City website under Permit
Assistance.
Review 1 – August 3, 2011
Review 2 – December 7, 2011
Review 3 – January 10, 2012
8/3/2011 comment - The original submittal for this application included sewer and storm design that
was no longer applicable to the project based on a meeting with Mr. Echelbarger held at the City on
th
. A cursory review of the storm system was completed and comments from this review are
June 20
th
provided below. On July 14 a revised site development, drainage and utility plan was submitted
via e-mail. Hard copies of these plans are to be provided with the next submittal. Please submit
three (3) sets of revised plans/documents with a written response to each of the items below to
Marie Harrison.
GENERAL
1.ok
2.ok
3.ok
4.ok
5.ok
6.See A-1 #4 below.
7.ok
1/10/12 – Please revise the City of Edmonds Approval block to state City Engineering
8.
Division instead of City Engineer.
A-1 – SITE PLAN
ok
1.
ok
2.
ok
3.
1/10/12 – comment not addressed
4.
12/7/11 – comment not addressed.
8/3/11 comment - The sanitary sewer easement area should be shown in the “New Site Plan”
view as well as the “Exist. Site Plan” view.It was my understanding that a new easement would
need to be provided for the section of sewer main crossing the subject property. Please confirm
the referenced easement exists in the location shown on the site plan. If an easement does exist
in this location it will likely need to be revised to clearly specify details of sewer main
maintenance and responsibility. Further discussions will be needed with the City to address
future main line responsibility, maintenance, access, etc.
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ok
1.
2.N/A – storm system redesigned
3.N/A – storm system redesigned
ok
4.
ok
5.
ok
6.
ok
7.
ok
8.
1/10/12 – The plans indicate two #4 CB’s. Please revise.
9.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
ok
1.
ok
2.
1/10/12 – Please revise as follows:
3.
12/7/11 – Thank you for providing the information requested below by the 8/3/11 comments.
Please revise as follows:
a.ok
b.ok
1/10/12 – Please revise/remove the following:
c.
Encasement Pipe Detail – delete bell & spigot throughout. Remove Note 1, which
cannot be an option as the casing will run a risk of filling with sewage through the
opening should the pipe get clogged. Please add “see detail” at the end of the note
“two spacers placed at each end of casing (typ)”.
12/7/11 - Please refer to the attached schematic providing additional detail with regards
to the spacers, sewer manhole connection, etc. Incorporate notes into the plan set and
revise notes on plans as required. Also, as shown in the attached schematic, due to the
significant change in pipe size between the 18” encasement pipe and the 8” sewer main,
an additional 12” DIP pipe should be placed at the manhole connections to allow for
Page 2 of 3
proper installation of the link seals. The 12” DIP is only needed at these connection
points and may only be 1-foot in length, depending on design.
1/10/12 – Please revise as follows:
d.
12/7/11 - Please provide an enlarged detail of the sewer main connection at the
manholes.
8/3/11 comments - Please provide a profile and detail for the 8” sewer main to be
encased in 18” ductile iron pipe.
a.ok
b.ok
c.ok
1/10/12 – SSMH 2 actually is a new MH and SSMH 1 is a replacement.
d.
8/3/11 - Clearly indicate manhole replacement versus installation of new.
Manholes shall be placed so as to allow for maximum achievable slope on the
sewer main pipe.
e.Indicate proposed slope of sewer main in the profile.
1/10/12 – Delete bell and spigot from detail.
f.
ok
4.
ok
5.
ok
6.
ok
7.
ok
8.
WATER SYSTEM
ok
1.
ok
2.
Please contact me at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have
specific questions regarding these plan corrections.
Page 3 of 3