Loading...
Cover letter and supporting materials.pdfI� 11( G 6 ji r i 23 March 2017 To whom it may concern, We live at 18309 76th Ave W, Edmonds, WA 98026-5411 in what is known as Perrinville. Our house is located at the base of a hill which crooks from the eastern property line around to the southern property line. The house was used as a rental for about 15 years prior to our purchase in June 2015. No upkeep was done to the hillside vegetation, consequently it was choked with black berry vines and ivy, which climbed up the trees causing extensive damage to the trees. The trees at the base of the hill were photo tropic and grew directly over the roof of our house, posing imminent damage during wind storms. Consequently we received permission from Edmonds to remove many of the trees posing a threat to our house. We were not able to afford addressing all of the trees posing a threat to our house at that time. Currently we have replanted much of the hillside with native ground cover, azaleas, rhodedendrons, camelias, Indian Plum, cherry, crabapple, Japanese maple, vine maple, and other shorter varieties of trees to replace the Alders which were removed. There are many other Alder trees higher up the hillside which we hoped we could preserve, however, some of them are in the process of dying. They lean over more with each passing month and pose a danger to our house and our neighbor's house. We have left in the stumps of all the felled trees in order to help preserve the stability of the hillside. We have used the trunks and larger branches of the felled trees as terracing for increased stability. We are proposing to remove the Alders posing a threat to our house and our neighbor's house. We will leave the stumps in place. Please find included the Tree Risk Assessment and photos for further clarification. Thank you, r Maja and Knighton Ve— t FO REEN :_E CARE INC. CONTRACT SUBMITTED TO: 01 Name h6, Street Arborists of WA, Inc. Northwest's Largest Tree Preservation Company NW Pruners, Inc. CONTRACT FOR WORK Licensed 9 Bonded *Insured TO BE PERFORMED Washington Cont. Lic. #EVERGTC01 1JM 14205 TREE REMOVAL CONTRACT 1 `2 M304 www.evergreelntic.com City A % State zip Phone OFFICE USE: (CK cc 0 TRr 0 sc 0 Wli E3 SG 0 ( CKB_AMT$_oat 'K4 LLAID)SOUTR"CE "We are never too busy for referrals" ISA Member Job site address; same as "Submitted to" unless otherwise noted. On Staff 14205 0 Tree Removal Contract 0 Home Owner understands cabling & bracing is warrantled for 3 years from the initial installation date -initials SUBTOTAL v 2, Y 7 77 TAX T rked correctly for removal, Arborist Initial TERMS: A 10% non-refundable d COT pie n, unless otherwise noted. Should project. not becornpleteby month end, the percentage receive' as outlined above, the balance due maybe subject to late fees and interest of 1 %per month. In the event It becomes necessary to enforce payment, the client agrees to pay ail collection costs Incurred by Ever -Green, including attorney's fees and costs, regardless of whether legali action is filed with the courts or not. Acceptance gives Ever -Green authorization to obtain credit Information where extending credit to an Individual or a business. Customer is responsible to define all property lines and In the event of dispute with neighboring property owners over trespass, customer agrees to defend Ever -Green Tree Care Inc., and hold Ever -Green Tree Care Inc, harmless. In the event there Is a dispute other than nonpayment, both parties agree the first step Is non-binding arbitration with the Better Business Bureau. Ever -Green reserves the right to modify contract otvoid entirely, If it deems any task within unsafe. All additional work requested by customer above and beyond what Is written In this contract will constitute additional charges. Cancellation of this contract requires written notice by US Mail within 72 hours of acceptance to P.O. Box 11155, Spokane, WA 99211, Permit cost, acquisition, and municipal code compliance Is customer responsibility unless noted above. Should landscape get damaged, both parties agree that Ever -Green will reseed any damaged turf areas and replace any plants and trees with similar species In common nursery available size. Ever -Green's fire suppression service is to help reduce the chance of fire spreading only. Our liability is limited to our onsite work. Signature below indicates you agree to the terms set forth and have received a copy of this contract. Customer acknowledges they are responsible for permission from neighbor when trees and shrubs are on shared property line prior to work commencing. Customer acknowledges that final decision on work to be performed was made by customer, Customer acknowledges If any tree/s is a healthy living tree, that Ever. -Green Tree Care Inc. has discussed alternatives to tree removals, s4gh as trimming. Customer acknowledges that the tree/s, is property of the customer. if third party crane company is utilized on site, customer agrees to hold Ever-Trg� ' are Inc, harmless in the event of property damage from said crane. Three year cabling warranty is limited to Repair or Replacement of cabling syst�'m In the event duct failure, or defective Installation. This warranty does not cover excessive winds or other Act of God, For warranty to be sr valid, client must con tacl,tverg enzjnnuaII:, � �nspe,ct cabling system. Additionally tree may need frequent pruning to keep, stress on cabling system within reason. Additional pruning to xpe e�ften using, climbing spurs enhances crew safety trernmedously with little chance of longterm harm to the tree, The Tree -note a safe job site for them. ds, giqypyrne have this discretion to use these tools or not to proi Climbers and Crew LfA �i I EVER -GREEN BY: Z Apply to my credit card, as per terms, Card Toli Free Fax (866) 875-3569-3020 Issaquah -Pine Lake Road, PIVIB # 503 - Sammamish, WA 98075 1400 -684 -THEE (87331 DEIH APPROX. HEIGHT REMOVALTYPE '(Dead, Dying, TARGET REMOVAL ID TREE SPECIES (inches) (Feet) Decayed, Other) (Yes or No) ) B J"t 7 C 1D /� t1'. E SUBTOTAL v 2, Y 7 77 TAX T rked correctly for removal, Arborist Initial TERMS: A 10% non-refundable d COT pie n, unless otherwise noted. Should project. not becornpleteby month end, the percentage receive' as outlined above, the balance due maybe subject to late fees and interest of 1 %per month. In the event It becomes necessary to enforce payment, the client agrees to pay ail collection costs Incurred by Ever -Green, including attorney's fees and costs, regardless of whether legali action is filed with the courts or not. Acceptance gives Ever -Green authorization to obtain credit Information where extending credit to an Individual or a business. Customer is responsible to define all property lines and In the event of dispute with neighboring property owners over trespass, customer agrees to defend Ever -Green Tree Care Inc., and hold Ever -Green Tree Care Inc, harmless. In the event there Is a dispute other than nonpayment, both parties agree the first step Is non-binding arbitration with the Better Business Bureau. Ever -Green reserves the right to modify contract otvoid entirely, If it deems any task within unsafe. All additional work requested by customer above and beyond what Is written In this contract will constitute additional charges. Cancellation of this contract requires written notice by US Mail within 72 hours of acceptance to P.O. Box 11155, Spokane, WA 99211, Permit cost, acquisition, and municipal code compliance Is customer responsibility unless noted above. Should landscape get damaged, both parties agree that Ever -Green will reseed any damaged turf areas and replace any plants and trees with similar species In common nursery available size. Ever -Green's fire suppression service is to help reduce the chance of fire spreading only. Our liability is limited to our onsite work. Signature below indicates you agree to the terms set forth and have received a copy of this contract. Customer acknowledges they are responsible for permission from neighbor when trees and shrubs are on shared property line prior to work commencing. Customer acknowledges that final decision on work to be performed was made by customer, Customer acknowledges If any tree/s is a healthy living tree, that Ever. -Green Tree Care Inc. has discussed alternatives to tree removals, s4gh as trimming. Customer acknowledges that the tree/s, is property of the customer. if third party crane company is utilized on site, customer agrees to hold Ever-Trg� ' are Inc, harmless in the event of property damage from said crane. Three year cabling warranty is limited to Repair or Replacement of cabling syst�'m In the event duct failure, or defective Installation. This warranty does not cover excessive winds or other Act of God, For warranty to be sr valid, client must con tacl,tverg enzjnnuaII:, � �nspe,ct cabling system. Additionally tree may need frequent pruning to keep, stress on cabling system within reason. Additional pruning to xpe e�ften using, climbing spurs enhances crew safety trernmedously with little chance of longterm harm to the tree, The Tree -note a safe job site for them. ds, giqypyrne have this discretion to use these tools or not to proi Climbers and Crew LfA �i I EVER -GREEN BY: Z Apply to my credit card, as per terms, Card Toli Free Fax (866) 875-3569-3020 Issaquah -Pine Lake Road, PIVIB # 503 - Sammamish, WA 98075 1400 -684 -THEE (87331 a ►0 m Q t n rn 0 M 00 r - Gt7 Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client M v d T f Date 3' rime Address Tree location a "r�" w� iA�' � ...� ITIT � � � ...�.......,. Trees ecles -- Height 0 C Sheet 1 of p � •:; dblt �v+ �� Tree no r� pread dia. O Assessors �° �� Time frame _ ..,� Tools used Ar Pf Target Assessment +t_zr m E Target zone Occupancy �• rate a4o 1 -rare y = 3 t -1 = 'c Target description 'a ;° c F r '........................... ty x z - occasional u 3 -frequent -B N u tm I M ri vm 4 -constant a` E aC n 1 �o - Ajua "%f I Y Itj D IND Site Factors Sitechanges JLL History of failures �� � "' 4 �""ie � "" C,�sV"V'� � .ti Topography Flat❑ Slope'd��' Aspect han es None❑ Grade Chan e❑ Site clearin tq Changed soil hydrology ❑ Root cuts Describe "") ttf --ice 1` Lw" Soil conditions Limited volume ❑ Saturated IQ Shallow ❑ Compacted ❑ Pavement over roots ❑ B % De� i '1 Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong windlce❑ Snow[] Heavy rainDescribeg Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Lo Normal ❑�i�❑ F None (seasonal)ip None (dead)K Normal % Chlorotic / Necrotic `fid Pests L t i Abiotic o 0 Species failure profile Branches TrunkD(I Roots Destribeb I , 6 k— fA SIOCt Windex osure Protected Partial❑ Full i.. Load Factors _ p �..� Windmfunneling,❑ .-� ITmmIT........-...�Relative crown size ^Small Medium Large❑ Crown density Sparse$( Normal ❑ Dense ❑ Interior branches Fewfir Normal ❑ Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss ❑ Recent or planned change in load factors Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crownLCR % Cracks fyG °; fir' Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches44,, -5b .............` overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. o Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole % _ circ. Over-extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Toppi❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other 1 Nd kiLy� Response growth Main concern(s)C p i . o Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Signiificant! e Fi t Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ imminent it —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark Abnormal bark texture/colo Collar buried/Not visible@ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems ❑ Included bark ❑ Crack-41Dead ❑ Decay Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ % circ. Lightning damage Heartwood decay ❑ Conks/Mushrcums ❑ Cracks'q Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weaknes Lean `� Corrected? g Response rowth Response growth P Main concern(s) `j �� Main concern(s) �PNr Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant lk Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant �Ukeirihoodilure likelihood of failure Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminen Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ &rrlii7en' Page I of 2 Risk Categorization ` Consequences of Failure Likelihood Failure & Impact Negligible a E Significant Severe a, Failure Impact Consequences Failure & Impact c Extreme Likely .0 (from Matrix l) Risk m ? 3 Y Y c v Low Conditions N M a „ �, '_^ *' c ., °J Target >? a t — a c rating �,-, of part c U Tree part of concern a N o E 3 w m a ti protection E d a` > _ "C0000 E Y t7 � &°n 5 > y ° m> (from z Tn in Matrix 2) 1 Chopwn► �, k -33 0, 70 100600 0 00 p - (i L�010000 0100"% QOOO �, 010000 0010100,000NDO f 00000 00 Q0000 3 lQ Ls �juvt �La 00, Eo 0 MCC 00010001 QQQ01000 4 00 cacccoc000cu 0, COCC000000 Matrix I. Likelihood matrix. Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure & Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very, likely Low Moderate w i ; Extreme Likely Low ModerateHila High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Unlikely Low Low 'Low Low M Mitigation options Ot d 'b ""' � '°r l °' i Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High extreme ❑ 'Mlli'ork priority 1 Overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ Hig' Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval Datainal ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ❑No ❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection IimitationNone ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists —2013 Page 2 of 2 North w /yr .!, , r b n k rr' m a»u m ri( rfti � ! ito r r u�i r so, • rta F ` > i 1 r K "wr A4 a ri,� •10, � �� �l „� � � � BIW �' � � � i� � � "ai, +�✓ ��� � ,�i'°* r � r � r � r � � � �e° � �� � r � � � �� !� ,r a km ' r +o r4; /O hYra� J0 r N�� u€ ta +�4iro" ►"� of e 9u 1"nr 1'"Yowl", {�o+ *arm- t l r✓ �, fa'r - r )t, Al Ilk at m ,,, ' $ ri d NO, y % ;dry N. r r /Y r� Jr A�0 R» � � A . o � � „ 1bq" X100 y d »ou ! �;yr r, 'm„ y �� 7.,v�q, i1i ,� oir a „ / r rH �, �d ri ^� l' AW'a " i� 11� w,4ota P ► A i, rr 7� ,;,N, / i Alt ji /� M �, ♦ o • 71mi ,,;, 'AAA » i 4 V • 4a Iw �u �F • r r r » W^tl' 1��ti�GIT Ae �rt 7#ld kk Vii' a w iy G r 44 g IN 11� ;i luy / iia >v rrr 1,✓` " �� tm y�ly °,rrm wtt " • y,As t dui �¢ N, tt ,mww,r, uw r N 0 a �� �na�p y Al N o« t rk A, ;,, .nm 4 ►• s i�ro lu ,�k(w „`�, fy " u �� » ,» ` 'Al of �, � � •yam � i'< ,� � iXr,""�i ���, � +�G �� 1 ��ei �i �� �jP & m ' ig � i � {4 ' � ► ri {y � n°' + ,uws � / F 1 are Ali iW � a " nr 4 �� "" •� r ij",, A, • % r Ai IN " r A it lipire► i L �• � »A^� n �" � • �` ��� ' °Y a IY^"At, Of ► a� k t"Itt e / ti P"'s f Nlly, a ► u14 ti u" o � i " + m ► i . I mym Oji �➢ � * � • � L � h � �r "e OIr� �a + � � i � m tf • i , �M � � /ir � � �e %i �» »it IF/ m,,ba� Wim• w At OF �r a !�M � Nv y C"I'll", Client At'y Address/Tree location � Basic Tree M Risk Assessment Form _ Date / Time �,Jbf Tree no. of,� S Site Factors History failures Grade Topography4 FlatSlo Slop % Aspect Site changes None ❑ chan e ❑ Site clearing Changed soil hydrology 11 Root cuts Describe Soil conditions Limited volume ❑ Saturated&R shallow Compacted ❑ Pavement over roots ❑ _ % Describe _ _. Prevailing wind direction�..� Common weather Strong winds ice Snow Heavy rain Describe 1 e Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor g age None (seasonal None (dead Normal--,--% Vi or Low Nc(rm I ❑ Hi h ❑ Foliage )� Chlorotic % Necrotic µµµ_% Pests N Species failure Branches Trunk* Roots❑ Describe Abiotic .. ', 4 ' Load Factors Wind exposure Protected ❑ PartialUkFullO Wind funneling❑ Relative crown size SmalM ' Medium ❑ Large ❑ Crown density Sparse Normal ❑ DensJnte�rlO branches Fe Normal ❑ Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss ❑ Recent or planned change in load factors, Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crown LCR % CracksA Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches13 % overall Max. dia.Codominant ❑ Included bark 101 Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole _% circ. Over-extended branches ❑ Pruning history Previous branch failuresq Similar branches present ❑ Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ OtherI uon tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Toppe 0 6— Response growth C yyy y y r Main concern(s) Lo LIL� Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significance Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable XImminent ❑ —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark if Abnormal bark texture/colorCollar buried/Not visible(" Depth Stem girdling 11Codominant stems ❑ included bark ❑ Cracks Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sap ooze ❑ ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ % circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth Poor taper Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness 1 Lean ° Corrected?— Response growth r Response growth Main concerns) ii.la Main concern(s) L Load on defect N/A ❑ Micron ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significants Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminenli Improbable 13 Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminent^" Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Matrix i. Likelihood matrix. Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Notes, explana ons* descritions A' JkZ-- wj� RIS '...., VU AJ vv tze ,n Mitigation options fil P ' North J� ''' Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Lo+wMe ❑ Moderate ❑ Higlv Extreme ❑ Work priority 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ Overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ Higly Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval "nal ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ❑No ❑Yes-Type/Reason Data Inspection limitations one ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists - 2013 Page 2 of 2 Likelihood lowmava Risk rating Conditions 11011111111111111 of part of 00 � X WW WAX W, 0" W �. MEN� mmw� NEER I 72011CONER EN _ w Matrix i. Likelihood matrix. Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Notes, explana ons* descritions A' JkZ-- wj� RIS '...., VU AJ vv tze ,n Mitigation options fil P ' North J� ''' Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Lo+wMe ❑ Moderate ❑ Higlv Extreme ❑ Work priority 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ Overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ Higly Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval "nal ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ❑No ❑Yes-Type/Reason Data Inspection limitations one ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists - 2013 Page 2 of 2 0 � is Tree Risk Assessmeptform Address/Tr _ Client Address/Tree location �I Date Time Tree species _ d l Height _.._Tr 1� Crown spread eea .�- ( Assessors) , Time frarrme, ��' Tools useci YN "0.. .k. v. Target Assessment " I—six t, L'. e - change i P'I=rt"Ag Topography FlatSlolp History Aspec /-i - Site changes None[:] Grade ❑Site clearingZ<Changedsoil hydrology RDescrib .) I kt� zs Soil conditions Limited volurne Saturatedik Shallow Compacted R Pavement over roots % Des r ? / °'A Cee Prevailing wind direct on Common weather Strong win6l lce ❑ Snow ❑ Heavy rain Descrikae _ Tree Health and Species Profile Pestsli High ❑a _ Foliage None (seasonal' Aioinic(dead) ❑ il Normal, % Chlorotic % Necrotic'" Vigor / Species failure profile Branches(„ TrunkE�Roots❑ Descrlbe- e) / i t' " .� t�,�1 7 ar.. ww_w Load Factors r1'r Wind exposure Protected ❑ Parti l° Full ❑ Wind funneling ❑ Relative crown size Small Medium ❑ Large ❑ Crown density Sparsdl Normal ❑ Dense ❑ lr�I riot branches FOAl "Normal 13 Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/f loss ❑ Recent or planned change in load factors " Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — an drown LCR % Unbalanced Cracks Lightning damage Target zone Codominant ❑ Included bark ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole _% circ.. Over-extended branches ❑ Occupancy �• Pruning history �E Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ z c'.........xi 3 ; 'a rate 1 -rare $ d m�02. c :3Target description �° c x • ►— S T) ul z -occasional 3—frequent .F u —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark 04 Abnormalbark texture/colorCollar In ~ 12 4—constant a E a Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ % circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poortaper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean P.Corrected? _� 2 Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) � Main concerns roF`)i"` Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant Load on defect N/A Minor Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ 3_ Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminea Improbable ❑ PossiblProbable ❑ Imminent ❑ Pave I of 2 4 Site Factors change i P'I=rt"Ag Topography FlatSlolp History Aspec /-i - Site changes None[:] Grade ❑Site clearingZ<Changedsoil hydrology RDescrib .) I kt� zs Soil conditions Limited volurne Saturatedik Shallow Compacted R Pavement over roots % Des r ? / °'A Cee Prevailing wind direct on Common weather Strong win6l lce ❑ Snow ❑ Heavy rain Descrikae _ Tree Health and Species Profile Pestsli High ❑a _ Foliage None (seasonal' Aioinic(dead) ❑ il Normal, % Chlorotic % Necrotic'" Vigor / Species failure profile Branches(„ TrunkE�Roots❑ Descrlbe- e) / i t' " .� t�,�1 7 ar.. ww_w Load Factors r1'r Wind exposure Protected ❑ Parti l° Full ❑ Wind funneling ❑ Relative crown size Small Medium ❑ Large ❑ Crown density Sparsdl Normal ❑ Dense ❑ lr�I riot branches FOAl "Normal 13 Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/f loss ❑ Recent or planned change in load factors " Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — an drown LCR % Unbalanced Cracks Lightning damage Dead g % overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole _% circ.. Over-extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Topped Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other ,-- rowth Respgrowth Main concern(s) 6'o CB Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminent(R. . p fit, V, i" i; —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark 04 Abnormalbark texture/colorCollar buried/Not visible Depth Stem girdling ❑ T Codominant stems ❑ Included bark ❑ Cracks 11Dead ❑ Decay Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ % circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poortaper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean P.Corrected? _� Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) � Main concerns roF`)i"` Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant Load on defect N/A Minor Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminea Improbable ❑ PossiblProbable ❑ Imminent ❑ Pave I of 2 I Risk Categorization Matrix/. Likelihood matrix. Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Notes, explanations descriptions �� ,.ems . y Mitigation options North -".. i' Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low ❑ Moderate ❑ Hight( Extrenne ❑ Work priority 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 91( Overall residual risk Low ❑ ModeratM High ❑ Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval Data al ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ❑No ❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ONone ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe 'This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists — 2013 Page 2 of 2 ConditionsRisk of concern _ Likelihood T. 1 MM NW E / f 1NW .. ���iw.. rl 1.k µ E� IXI �.101W X RX [01 .104 X rt W 104 701 W WE WE 101 Matrix/. Likelihood matrix. Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Notes, explanations descriptions �� ,.ems . y Mitigation options North -".. i' Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low ❑ Moderate ❑ Hight( Extrenne ❑ Work priority 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 91( Overall residual risk Low ❑ ModeratM High ❑ Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval Data al ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ❑No ❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ONone ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe 'This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists — 2013 Page 2 of 2 9 J "Y' d �� Basic Tree his Assessment �Form Time. -® f . Client _ Address/ gree locatioW �diafa* Hei ht C Sheet of ' m � Tree no. Tree ........ Crown s read dia. Assessor(s)l-, 6111, l fit'' ._ ,fW Time frame �• g Tools used r, 'E, Target Assessment ('ll ( r t S NL - Target zone Occupancy M. w `w t x t rate ° c �E 15 C� 2 1—rare �A .L C Target description ;'a �° c 3 x 2—occasional Fu w i� u frequent u fi H ~ 4—constant as E cc a 2 3 i 4 Site Factors ." _wWWW_ .�� ....oHisto of failures TopographyFlat[] SY� � _ �spect 'Changed soil hydrology❑ Roo❑ Describe Site changes None ❑Grade change ❑ Site cleaurag .-... _.- a Soil conditions Limited volu el�r'°Saturated ❑ Shah( [3 Compacted I�Pavement over roots[]' % Descrl e a? it t (L"�- Prevailing wind direction � Common weather Strong wind' Ice ❑ Snow ❑ Heavy rai Describe ���..-- _ _ Tree Health and Species dProfil Vigor Low NorNormal .... �% Chlorotic mm/..... _ Necrotic i°�k Pests m,❑ Fligh IJ None seasonal None , �" Abi o c ---- d Species failure profile Brancheq�l Trunk Roots ❑ Describe_ - > Load Factors _„ tY p nneling❑ Relative crown size Small Medium❑ Large❑ p ❑ Wind fu Crown dense S arse Normal ❑ Dense ❑ interior branches Few Normal ❑ Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Mos_Wr planned in load factors Recent oro lane Prohtaect e p change Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crow.° LC'R % Cracks ❑ ... Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branche „ „%overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ _ _ Included bark ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Over-extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned 11 Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Main concern(s) �,j'r " Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significan Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminent' —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark l Abnormal bark texture/colo Collar buried/Not visible Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems ❑ Included bark ❑ Cracks Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms l Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ % circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean ° Corrected?,_ Response growth Response growth Main ccancern(s) a r W, () f Main concerns �Fk ) i. Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significary Load on defect N/k Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure Improbable El Possible ❑ Probable ❑ Imminen Improbable❑ PossibI Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Page I of 2 N Risk Categorization 4 Matrix /. Likelihood matrix. MaVix2. Risk rating matrix. North NTT_,e;p 00 Mitigation options Residual risk Residualrisk L-44" Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate 0 High 11 Extreme` �/ Work priority 10 211 311 6;1� Overall residual risk Low 0 Moderate 13 Hig)�, Extreme 0 Recommended Inspection interval Datilkinial U Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ONo [:]Yes-Type/Reason ..................... Inspection limitations Zpane OVisibility OAccess []Vines ORoot collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists, — 2013 Page 2 of 2 Conditions 1 TargetI 0 111 Likelihood pill Bell Risk rating of part 1111 o f concern (from W M M N 1011 W I 1 6 j S W:0111*1 co S 1101101 rN, NJ W Wj Z 1019:1 1011 NJ I Is 101 -0. W4 N 101101 614 Wo 101 co ro, X 1014101SINN 0 W M 0 M [01 101 N N NO 11011011019 12 101 Wj Wj co 101 co [01 101INl1 Ft N NJ 5911 ra ro WE 30] [01 101 WE 1071 1 107J co I 9 co 9 EO 1011: ON co co N 101 N[0:1 :01 WMM M I = = 101101 E-12 N ro j N ro, [01 N 512 101 N NJ ro , ro, N (A M [OR 30112 ro", ro, r0j L07 N N W I 70J A 10", M 4 Matrix /. Likelihood matrix. MaVix2. Risk rating matrix. North NTT_,e;p 00 Mitigation options Residual risk Residualrisk L-44" Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate 0 High 11 Extreme` �/ Work priority 10 211 311 6;1� Overall residual risk Low 0 Moderate 13 Hig)�, Extreme 0 Recommended Inspection interval Datilkinial U Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ONo [:]Yes-Type/Reason ..................... Inspection limitations Zpane OVisibility OAccess []Vines ORoot collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists, — 2013 Page 2 of 2