The URL can be used to link to this page

MasterPlan.pdfCity of Edmonds, Washington March 2017 V%/ALKERI',, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City of Edmonds Mayor Dave Earling Edmonds City Council Edmonds Planning Board City Staff Carrie Hite, Director, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services (PRCS) Renee McRae, Deputy Director, (PRCS) Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Manager, (PRCS) Rich Lindsay, Park Maintenance Manager, (PRCS) Rob Chave, Planning Manager Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Todd Cort, Recreation Coordinator Phil Williams, Public Works & Utilities Director Mike DeLilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Shane Hope, Director, Development Services Rich Lindsay, Parks Maintenance Manager Rob English, City Engineer Jennifer Lambert, Engineering Technician Consultant Team Project Advisory Committee Kyla Blair Barbara Chase Mike Echelbarger Kristiana Johnson Lesly Kaplan John McGibbon Joe Mclalwain Bob Rinehart Emily Scott Doug Sheldon Steve Shelton Valerie Stewart Dave Teitzel Dick Van Hollebeke Diana White Alex Witenberg Pat Woodell WALKER n Walker I Macy - Landscape Architecture, Project Lead Chris Jones, Principal Lara Rose, Design Principal Ann Marie Schneider, Project Manager, Landscape Designer Alyssa Machle John, Landscape Designer envie issues Enviroissues - Public Outreach / WBE Ara Swanson, Associate Harrison Price, Project Coordinator ORA - Architecture Owen Richards, AIA, LEED AP Steven Lazen, AIA Emily Perchlik, Assoc. AIA JMB Consulting Group, LLC - Cost Estimating Jon Bayles, Principal Herrera Environmental Consultants - Permitting HERRERA Shelby Petro, Wetland Scientist, Env. Permit Coordinator Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Master Plan Table of Contents SITE BACKGROUND &ANALYS|3.................................................. 9 History m Existingoonumom'---__-,--_---_--'__—__—'—_—'x) DESIGN DEVELOPMENT+ COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ............ 19 Process & Schedule ........................................................ —...... ... ... -...... _.......... zo Park Activities & Amenities ........... _'_------__—.......... .............. _—zz ExistingUses— ....... —,............. _...... ............ ............... .... . zz Potential New 24 Open House 1, June zous............................................................. ...... _... ............ zs Format uObjective ....................................................... 25 Informational Bourds—........................................... ---'........... ............. _'se Content 25 Interactive Boards ................................. ............ ........ ...................................... zs Program Models/ Games 27 Additional Outreach ....................................... —._--- .... ......... .... ............. zr Participation and Attendance ............................................ —'............ —'..... ....... za Feedback— ---_............................................................ ... .......... _........ ...... 28 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 30 Option z'Meadow Loop _.............................. ---................... _'--....... ao Option zActivity Central o amms—......................................................................... ---............. —_................. a^ Current Events 34 Design Alternative Event Overlays ....................................... —_.................... ss Open House 2, August 2016 --36 Format& Objective- .................. ............................................................................. as Small Group sa Participation and Attendance ___--_---------_'......... ...... sa Hybriddesign ................................ .... —.................... ........................................... «z Aerial View 43 Examples o|oe`aomFeatures .......................... ........ ,_.............. ... .............. /o Master Plan Views 46 Master Plan Event Overlays ................... ... .... ............ .......................................... _''m Small toMedium Sizssventswithmthepark'm Large Events and the 6th Avenue Market pmmenode'_—'_-------+s Architectural ---........... Boys and Girls Club ............. - .......................... so Examples mSiunatueFeatures ............................... ---.................... .............. s1 .............................. Participation and Attendance Phasing--'—___--____-.......... ........... ...... -_—...... .... _....... . 54 Supplemental Information ............. ---___—'--- ................. --___—_-.5a *e*Buffer c ..................... ........ ....................... ... —...... ........................................ s Utilities and City Planning, ....................................................... 55 Parking Considerations Tennis / Sports Fencing ........................................................................................... 55 Street Improvements ..... ............................................. 6th Avenue Market Promenade ..................... ..... .... .......... .............................. so 9 INTRODUCTION Civic [enter P|ay0e|d is an eight acne park in the heart of downtown Edmonds that straddles the boundary between residences, civic amenities and the downtown commercial district. Well -loved and used byresidents ofall ages, itishome Lothe Boys and Girls Club, the PetanqueClub, athletic fields, a playground, askatepark'tennis courts and several ofEdmonds largest annual festivals such asthe TasteofEdmonds and the 4th ofJuly Fireworks, Originally the Edmonds High School sports facility in the l93D's,the site has served as a recreational and event space for decades while the population of Edmonds has continued togrow and develop around it. TheCity has been operating and maintaining the property for public use since I975.with noinvestment ofcapital funds and little change tothe layout since its former use by Edmonds High School. in the 201.4 Parks' Recreation and Open Space Plan (PROS Pian)' Civic CenterP|ay0eid was identified as a key asset and securing the park, that had been leased homthe Edmonds School District fb/4Oyears, was deemed apriority. |ndirect response, the City mfEdmonds acquired the property inthe fall, o[2Ol5withgrant assistance from the Washington State Recreation Conservation OHice and che Snohomish ConsewoVon FuLures prop -mm, thereby ensuring that the site will remain accessible to the community, providing both passive and active recreation. In April 2016, through a Request For Qualifications and interview process, Walker Macy, aLandscape Architecture and Urban Design hrm.washired bytheEdmonds Parks. Recreation and [u|tunsi Services (EPRC8) department to lead the Civic Center P|ay0e|dVlasterP(anningeflortTheprojectgoa|wasto work with the City ofEdmon6sandthe [dmondscorn munityLn design aMaster Plan that envisions Civic Center P|ay0eidasa signature park inthe heart ofdowntown Edmonds. 6 EdmondmCvwiC Cem«er Poayflexd MasterPlan Fhe project undertook arigorous public engagement process, including three public open houses, three online open houses, stakeholder interviews and a series of meetings with the PnojectAdv|sory Com�iclree' the Parks and Recreation 5taffL the City Council and the Planning Board in order to create aplan inspired bythe community's desires and reflecting public sentiment and feedback. Several iterations of design and feedback were presented, tested and reviewed' resulting in a schematic design that integrates active pnogram, civic engagement and beautiful, landscape spaces, rhe Civic Center Pbyfield Master Plan embraces the pot nda| ofthis downtown park tocontribute toasense ofcommunity identity and civic pride while promoting active, healthy lifestyles, energizing the local economy and bolstering the city's growing reputation asadestination onPuget Sound. The legacy ofthe park asaniconic place for gathering, celebration and enhanced daily life is intended to serve Edmonds for generations tocome. ��U:Ilgw-llilll Edmonds Civic Center Playfleld Master Plan �/y �.�. sh� HISTORY Civic Center Playfield was the athletic grounds for Edmonds High School, originally built a block from the site at 410 Fourth Avenue North, now the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Prior to recreational development it's believed to have been a marshy field. In 1957 the high school relocated to the Holmes Corner neighborhood at 76th and 212th. The City has operated the property as a park since 1975 with minimal change to its amenities or use. 1930's - courtesy of the Sno-Isle Musem 1950's 2015 - Google Earth EXISTING CONDITIONS Today, the eight acre site includes a playground, basketball and tennis courts, football field, soccer fields, track, skate park, petanque courts, portable restrooms, and two structures - the grandstand and the Boys and Girls Club (former high school field house). Civic Center Playfield is currently used for neighborhood recreation, community sports team practices and games by local organizations such as Sno-King Youth Club and EPRCS recreation programs. It also hosts events such as the 4th of July, Taste of Edmonds, Edmonds Arts Festival parking and the Wenatchee Youth Circus. There are two structures on site, the field house, most likely built after 1935 when the district acquired the ,property, was remodeled in 1999 and is currently leased to the Edmonds Boys and Girls Club. The grandstand, also over 50 years old, is still used on occasion for events and also serves as storage for a number of local organizations. The Edmonds Boys & Girls Club has occupied the field house since 1968. It's currently operating at full capacity, serving aporoximaltely150childr&l Activtiesoffered atthe Boys&Girls Club include arts and crafts, computer use, homework help, volleyball and basketball, arts and music, snacks and meals. The building presently contains spaces typical in most Club facilities - ground floor offices, a small game/recreation room, computer lab area, restrooms, storage and service spaces. The upper floor, includes a gym and additional storage. The Boys & Girls Club is in conversation with EPRCS and the City to discuss the needs and plans of the organization in conjunction with the park redesign. The field house would likely require expansion if it is to continue to serve the growing needs of the Club. In a City of Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Special Meeting on June 29, 2016, a majority of the Commissioners "voiced support for retaining the field house structure due to its significance to the community and because it echoes what Edmonds used to look like in the 1920's and 1930's." The Commission also discussed the historic value of the entire site and the importance to the community of "retainingsome of it's historic [] flavor" as the park design continues (see Appendix For full HPC Meeting Minutes). The State of Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation recently ruled that the grandstand is not of historic significance and the State of Washington Recreation Conservation Ufice has approved the rernoval of the str,;cture, A structural review was also completed during the Master Plan effort with the conclusion that significant ^grades are needed to meet both structural and accessibility compliance (see full grandstand structural evaluation in Appendix). Panorama taken from the playground at the south east comer of the site The grandstand is to the left and back of the field house is left of center. Field house (Boys & Girls Club) entrance Grandstand Field house 2nd floor gymnasium RELATED STUDIES & PLANS Field house 1st floor entry area Prior studies were consulted by the project team during the master planning process. These include: 4th Ave implementation Plan w 4th Ave Arts Corridor Plan Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (PROS Plan), February 2014 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Edmonds Cultural Plan, February 2014 Edmonds Transportation Plan Edmonds Strategic Plan The Edmonds Waterfront Access Alternatives Study 1,ou", u,,y- I.. 11 CONTEXT UMMAKODDUS n dovq)�,vn M—YA CNN Unto (AIM svon a um qa no: Wo dims han m -m nal"n U., WOR; R1 Am Mexb Hatness and lack of tme cover 5M a1: apart from Yost Park and the SNM Cmd corhAq EdmoMs MwQj md WKS 1 to;mgmphy and significant tree cmmpy maMQ in a nuve paybe park experience Mh some active play area, while the nearby FrancesArderson CpnLer hosts agr(-,(m spmeohl nure intimate recreation ar-0 gathering, 12 EMMMAn QW, G""� Ph"ANO Mwo" VQp SI IE VIFwS Spectacular views of the Puget Sound and the Olympic mountain range area signature feature of the City of Edmonds. The east edge L Ik scale., Also noteworthy are the panoramic views from the streets and residences on the high slopes directly east of the park where the park grounds become foreground,. PARK EDGES AND CURRENT ZONING Civic Center Playfield is nestled between residential and civic zones and will be most successful if designed to respond to its adjacencies. The east side of the park is single-family residential while the north and south edges of the park consist of more dense multi -unit housing. The west edge is made up of predominantly civic institutions such as the police and fire stations, City Hall and the Edmonds Center for the Arts while also being at the edge of the downtown commercial district. 14 Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Master Plan TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Civic Center Playfield is within walking distance of most downtown amenties and a short bike ride for many residents. It is also in close proximity to regional transit, including the Ferry Terminal to Kingston and the Amtrak/Sound Transit commuter station to Seattle and Eve rett. 15 DOWNTOWN CONNECTIONS & DESTINATIONS Civic Center Playfield is a key component in a community circuit connecting local residences and civic destinations such as the Edmonds Farmers Market, the Sno-Isle Library, the Frances Anderson Center and downtown shops and restaurants. The park also has the potential to serve as part of an arts and culture plan with the evolving 4th Avenue Arts Corridor connecting Main Street to the Edmonds Center for the Arts. CIVIC FIELD EDMONDS, WA B ACRES CAL AAOERECN PARK SEATTLE, WA T5 ACRES SCALE COMPARISON EDMONDS CITY PARK EDMONDS, WA BELLEVUE DOWNTOU BELLEVUE, WA 21 ACRES PETER KIRK PARK KIRKLAND, WA 12.5 ACRES Parks similar to Civic Center Playfield, or known to local residents, were studied by the design team and shared with the public to facilitate understanding and discussion of the parks' program. ii lue t ti., ,i=,,,I rr, Arf, is 17 18 19 PROCESS & SCHEDULE The Civic Center Playfield Master Plan project team undertook a rigorous public engagement process that included three public open houses (offered both in-person and online); on- site postings, stakeholder interviews and outreach meetings. As a result, the design process was highly integrated with public engagement opportunities and public feedback shaped both the methods of design as well as the final plan. Stakeholders included the Boys and Girls Club, who currently lease the Field House on-site; recreational groups that use the fields such as Sno-King Youth Club and the Edmonds Petanque Club; groups that host events currently held at the park or nearby such as the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce (Taste of Edmonds), the Edmonds Art Festival and Festival Foundation; and of"er civic organizations directly effected by the park's potential transformation such as the Edmonds Arts Commission, the Museum/Market Board; City Council and Planning Board members; Edmonds Center for the Arts; Economic Development Commission; Floretum Garden Club; Historic Preseivation Commission; and City staff. Community feedback and design team progress was discussed in regular briefings to City Council, the Planning Board, Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services, and the Project Advisory Committee. The Project Advisory Committee was comprised of a broad selection of community representatives and leaders with varying interests selected to provide guidance to the projectteam. Mayor Dave Earling speaking at the first Open House on June 23rd, 2016, Mayor Earling provided introductions to all three Open Houses. 20 Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Master Man Each pub';lc open house addressed a different project milestone and incorporated, as well as solicited, feedback from the community. Online open houses were launched immediately following each in-person open house and were accessible for a minimum of two weeks. Project description, progress, schedule, open house results, and meeting minutes were posted publicly, and regularly, on the city's splash page at: http://www. edmondswa.gov/parks-recreation-departments/civic- center-master-plan. html The project was organized into three phases that corresponded with each Open House. All events took place in 2016 unless otherwise noted. Park Activities (Program) • PAC kickoff meeting: May 12 • Stakeholder Meetings: May 17 & 23 • Open House#1: June 23 • PAC meeting: July? • Planning Board Meeting: July 27 • City Council Meeting: August Master Plan Alternatives • Open House #2: August 24 • PAC Meeting: September • Planning Board Meeting: September 14 • City Council Meeting: September27 Hybrid Master Plan • Open House #3: October 19 • PAC Meeting: October 25 • Planning Board Meeting, Wednesday, November • City Council Meeting: January 17,2017 • City Council Adoption: March 7, 2017 DEED RESTRICTIONS The planni:-g e -ort considered the V!, site wit^ special consideration for six of the acres that fall under Conservation Easement Deed restrictions as outlined by the Washington State Recreation Conservatior, Office and The Snohomish Conservation Futures Program. 21 PARK ACTIVITIES & AMENITIES Existing Uses Existing Civic Center Playfield amenities include a large multi- use lawn with sports fields, a 400-metertrack, a playground and various courts that accommodate a number of activities. Uses for the park were categorized into active, passive, civic and event spaces and the community was engaged to determine what existing program should remain and what new program was desired. Parking is not currently provided in the park while storage space exists below the Grand Stand, within the Field House and the shed. These uses were also put forth for discussion. Soccer/Lacrosse Fields (2 -1 Adult and 1 Youth) Tennis Courts (2) « Petanque Courts (4) Basketball Courts (2) Basebak/Softball Field (1) Skate Park Taste of Edmonds 4th of July Fireworks Wenatchee Youth Circus Sports tournaments « Arts Festival (parking) Boys & Girls Club (Field House) Grand Stand « Storage 22 Edmonds Civic Center Playfieid Master Place Parks in the greater Edmonds area were reviewed to understand nearby amenities available to residents, to help identify priorities and to facilitate discussion about the potential future uses of the park. TOTAL FACILITIES FOR LOCAL PARKS AND NUMBER AT CIVIC SCHOOLS COMBINED (INCLUDING CCP) CENTER PLAYFIELD Soccer Fields (Adult + Youth): .... 10 Tennis Courts: ...................... — 7 Petanque:...................................... 4 Basketball Courts:.......... ............. 10 4 11 (Ad u It + Youth): ............ 11 Skate Park: ......... - - - --, . 2 Pickfeball:...................................... 10 23 Potential New Uses In addition to existing uses, new ideas for park activities were put forth forcommunity feedback in Open House 1. Ideas came from interests expressed by the community, stakeholders and the design team. plaza cafe Proposed uses included: water feature performance space permanent art temporary art - exercise path (informal track) promenade creative play (informal playground, nature play, etc.) covered market space seasonal games (shuffle board, ping pong, etc.) museum display classes (yoga, tai chi, etc.) restrooms µ activities clubhouse concessions theater performances - • markets music µ multi -use lawn culinary events horticultural gardens art installations stormwater gardens fun -runs berms shade trees picnic areas strolling paths shade pavilion 24 Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Master Plan OPEN HOUSE 1, JUNE 2016 (see detailed summary in Appendix) Format & Objective The first in-person Open House on June 23, 2016, consisted of a presentation, Q&A, and a series of informational and interactive boards for participant engagement. The online version provided the same content in an electronic format. The objective of the session was to gauge community interest in specific park amenities and activities and to begin to develop a sense of identity (theme) for the park. Informational Boards I113ACKGROUND MW Content • Informational boards about the site background, existing conditions, restrictions, context and scale. • Interactive boards allowing participants to "vote" for favored activities and themes as well as comment directly on an aerial of the site. • Interactive models (3) that allowed participants to better understand the scale of different existing and proposed programs and how much the park could accommodate. • Comment forms for additional written feedback. r O II' 1J ((II /;,,,,li,, f a raM�"uk ri, fU ,i snr I MW JrI0,fiflrzmi, Lckmyrs d.r Nwite r �WQ r6'1W f / V1�1,��' 9 t/ tlfj�/yGOr i // N4AINI r �, � U f h, � f / (-F� �M �° J�✓� JJl �N�i dl��p � / / r .. VYAI . /,.t.gnr,' iu;�'w 25 � gr yV r v n Content • Informational boards about the site background, existing conditions, restrictions, context and scale. • Interactive boards allowing participants to "vote" for favored activities and themes as well as comment directly on an aerial of the site. • Interactive models (3) that allowed participants to better understand the scale of different existing and proposed programs and how much the park could accommodate. • Comment forms for additional written feedback. r O II' 1J ((II /;,,,,li,, f a raM�"uk ri, fU ,i snr I MW JrI0,fiflrzmi, Lckmyrs d.r Nwite r �WQ r6'1W f / V1�1,��' 9 t/ tlfj�/yGOr i // N4AINI r �, � U f h, � f / (-F� �M �° J�✓� JJl �N�i dl��p � / / r .. VYAI . /,.t.gnr,' iu;�'w 25 Interactive Boards Five boards were placed at the back of the room and offered opportunity for a range of input from participants. Design staff were also available for discussion and questions. uyNCMIN i W i%l/�/ ;,,,; WNW*ININNI "rzlRWOR's s houfd coil l8i n w ?' �Pfoarra p koa 111104do the evOet ud woas# « W,,,, V r MA 26 Edmonds Civic Center PlayfieW Master Plan PIN A COMMENT ON CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD 'Mck a crmnn"1111�1i,dt on ths, odo or 1121figgin", Special Considerations Program Models / Games Participants were able to test out ideas and gain a better understanding of the s'ze and compatibiity of different park activities by placing scaled model pieces on top of corresponding site aerials. This was also a way to explore the flexibility of different programs to serve a variety of uses, for exarnple plaza space that also serves as performance space or multi -use lawn that can also host events. Additional Outreach Youth from the Student Conservation Association were engaged in an additional outreach event hosted by Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. Park opportunities were discussed and students were encouraged to engage with the model to test their ideas. The twelve students in attendance encouraged prioritizing year-round active uses including games, concessions and a zip line. Youth from the Student Conservation Association were engaged and took turns testing out ideas on the models. Participants at Public Open House #1 working with site program models to understand :he sca',e of different pafk programs 27 Participation and Attendance (See detailed summary in Appendix) Attendance and participation in Open House 1 was impressive and demonstrated the communities passion forthe future of Civic Center Playfield. In -Person Open House, June 23, 2016 Attendance: • 131 signed in • 141 attended Online Open House (6/24/2016-7/7/2016) Statistics: • 1,350 total page views • 180 responses received Feedback Themes (Priorities) Three ideas were put forth as over -arching themes for the park. The feedback received expressed the desire for the new park to be characterized primarily as active, with passive as a close second and civic garnering the least interest. Theme In -Person Votes Online Votes Total _- . Active -... ............................................. ._ ........ 53 .......... ......... 21 ...._.. ........ 74, . ..... Passive ... ... ..... 50 ............ __ 12 62 Civic ....... ..... --20 3____ 23 28 Activities Over 40 activities were solicited for feedback and then tracked and summarized to help the design team prioritize elements for the new park design. The activities with the greatest number of votes are shown below (see full results are in the Appendix). Note, there was no way of prohibiting multiple votes so counts are taken as reasonable, rather than absolute, gauges of public interest. Activity Type 36 iCurrent v, Possible) Catesory Possibilities active — _.-.-..-.---------- Cu rre nt Activities CurrentActivities ------ active -- -----------------------_..._ Possibilities .......- ..... active ........ ......... Current Activities active Possibilities passive Current Activities active Current Activities activ Current Activities active Current Activities -- - - buildings -------------------------------------------- Possibilities passive Possibilities passive Current Activities active Possibilities events Possibilities --- passive Current Activities active Possibilities civic Current Activities active Current Activities buildings Possibilities... civic Possibilities � ........._ active Possibilities passive Possibilities active Possibilities passive Possibilities civic Possibilities civic restrooms 41 36 77 43 28 71 —--------- 35 ---------------- 32 67 29 ............. 27 -........... w. 56 .. .....r 25 25 50 21 29 .. ...... ... 50 . 24 25 49 -------------------- - 16 ---------------- 32 48 28 28 ------- -------- 19 . -.- ----I.--.- 47 17 25 „a 42v._w_ ... .................................................. 15 ......... ............ 25 — --------- 40 10 29 39 18 17 35 14 20 34 5 29 34 13 18 31 16 14 30 12 17 29 15 13 .... ......... 28....... . 12 is 27 16 10 26 13 13 126 , 10 16, 10 15/%i WE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES Based on community input, the design team developed two master plan alternatives, each intended to emphasize one of the two main themes that emerged from community input, active versus passive, and to encourage further discussion on these two topics. The final plan would eventually emerge as a hybrid between these two alternatives, as informed by the community process. Option i - Meadow Loop The design concept for the Meadow -cop provides a generous landscape buffer on the residential edges of the park and a more civic edge along 6th Avenue, while more intense uses are concentrated in the central multi -use lawn. This option introduces more passive landscape features into the park perimeter, including meadows, berms and stormwater gardens that frame the central active space. This option features jogging and walking paths with exercise stations around a central lawn area large enough to accommodate the same level of soccer usage that occurs now. A wide, promenade -style sidewalk along 6th Avenue allows for strolling or markets and includes a plaza and shade pavilion that could accommodate food concessions, movable tables and chairs, and a small water feature. This scheme also includes a small amount of other recreational program - multi- use courts and petanque - that flank the community hubs at either end of the civic edge. Meadow Loop Precedents The following images, from existing parks, are intended to give a sense of the general character of the proposed features. Meadows and gardens Creative, integrated play areas Multi -use lawn Promenade / flexible -use market space Shade pavilion and plaza Passive landscape gardens 30 Edmonds Civic Center Play'iield Master Plan COMMUNITY HUBS CONNECTIONS MEADOW Loop SITE PLAN ACTIVITY ZONES 31 Option 2 - Activity Central The design concept for Activity Central creates a generous neighborhood connection along the old Sprague Street right-of-way and allocates the southern portion to active recreation Space wh ie c,eat'ng Ou'eter '.andsca^e 'Uuffef Io -"e r'orHl. This OpDcYi maximizes recreational activities and facilitates spectatorship. It includes a 200 -meter trai;k, mul❑-Use[awns for Soccer and OLhe- siports, ai' Vewinp C^cr 8Cc5 chaC Offer views of both mountains and playfields. Option 2 also includes petanque groves, a skate park, and four multi -use courts around an expanded Field House that could potentially house the Boys and Girls Club or a cafe and restrooms. The north portion of the park is still fairly active but more landscaped in character, and includes a picnic or performance pavilion a' -d mulkti-gei�erauc"a. Qlay ane exercise ?reaS, Tie ",aln Dad"` acioss bice perk Offers a clear connection from the residential neighborhood to the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor and ahe' cMC Oesuriatic:'s. -is poll, also Olf, rS the aotenmai 'or "bnnlcln_' rnarkeLS and 011e` events into the park. Activity Central Precedents The following images, from existing parks, are intended to give a sense of the general character of the proposed features. Shade pavilion and picnic area Landscape integrated play All -ages recreation Small plaza with interactive water Feature Game courts within shade trees and planting beds, 2 ,Hi.�/.lr COMMUNITY HUBS ACTIVITY CENTRAL SITE PLAN CONNECTIONS ACTIVITY ZONES UMNe,v,,, girh Coij,MrVWWriflhJ 33 EVENTS Current Events There are currently a number of events that take place at Civic Center Playfield. These include: The Taste of Edmonds - an annual festival held in August that utilizes most of the park and hosts a number of vendors, activities and performances. This event generates significant revenue for the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce who would like to see it continue. Conversation with the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce is ongoing and the organization is open to discussion about hove the event could evolve with the park, including reviewing ine4`ciencies w'th The festiva'. layout and the potential to move vendor parking off-site. 4th of July Fireworks - during the day, a parade begins at 6th Avenue adjacent to the park. At night, spectators fill the park to watch the fireworks. Sports tournaments - the Sno-King Youth Club and other organizations sometimes host sports tournaments on the grounds. Arts Festival (parking) - The annual Arts Festival in late June is held at the nearby Frances Anderson Center and the Civic Center Mayfield is used by participants forvendor parking and camping. Wenatchee Youth Circus PARK BOONDARY MOD—S ft: 7th Avenue H Map Key W •lion%L.,i Children B-th P,.,V.,— ® ATM 34 Falffnvwu4� r-i,f4 : Cprnter Play eld IV9 astea, P@,aai 91 Design Alternative Event Overlays Throughout the design process, careful consideration was given to providing flexible use spaces that could accommodate a variety of types and scales of events. Ongoing conversation with the community and stakeholders about current and future event uses will continue as the park design develops. To facilitate conversation about event use, the following diagrams were presented in Open House 2 to illustrate the amount of park space available. MEADOW LOOP EVENT OVERLAY ACTIVITY CENTRAL EVENT OVERLAY rrd �iti�t,�u /a��2V� udnl�trua'tan��^roYrI ��a"Aarrrrov�iUr�'�a9,/i r r at,gdla ,xr, �r9t 35 OPEN HOUSE 2, AUGUST 2016 (see detailed summary in Appendix) Format & Objective The second in-person Open House on August 24, 2016, included the presentation of two alternative park designs, Q&A, and small group discussions with a final report back to the larger group. The online version provided the same content in an electronic format. The objective of the session was to encourage dialogue aoout differing t',ernes and park program elements and to garner community feedback on the direction of design development so that a final hybrid plan could be developed. The following questions were asked as a starting point for in- person feedback and discussion as well as online comments: Which alternative park plan do you prefer? Please share your thoughts about Option 1. What do you like or dislike about this option? Please share your thoughts about Option 2. What do you like or dislike about this option? Are there park elements not shown in either option that you would like to see? Additional comments were encouraged. Resident and local business owner Rick Steve's sharing the outcome of their small group discussion. 36 Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Waster Plan In-person attendees watching presentation at Open House 2.. Small Group Discussions Large side-by-side plan drawings were provided for each of 16 tables at the In -Person Open House and attendees split themselves into groups of 8-12 to discuss the similarities and differences between the design alternatives and share their interests and visions for the park. The group overwhelmingly agreed to extend the time of the in-person Open House to allow each table to report back on the outcome of their discussions with the larger group. MEADOW LOOP FEATURES multi -use lawn/play fields (2 small or 1 large soccer field) walking/jogging paths 11/2 multi -use courts 4 petanque courts berms obstacle course with exercise stations meadows and gardens playgrounds existing fieldhouse / Boys & Girls Club shade pavilion & restrooms plaza with water feature or art installation ACTIVITY CENTRAL FEATURES multi -use lawn/playfields (1 large + 1 small soccer field) walking/jogging circuit 2 multi -use courts 2 tennis courts 8 petanque courts 200 -meter track skatepark playground sand volleyball M parking exercise stations expanded Field House for B&G Club / Cafe / restrooms picnic terrace with shade pavilion plaza with small, interactive water feature her skIri -6 Ca imirionILAP'llity III nHJaqm iiv°uent 37 Participation and Attendance (see detailed summary in Appendix) In -Person Open House, August 24, 2016 Approximately 160 attendees 16 Discussion Tables Preferred Plan (by majority at table): • Option 1: 8 (50%) • Option 2: 4 (25%) • Split: 2 (12.5%) • Unclear: 2 (12.5%) Individual Comment Cards: • Option 1 preferred: 5 • Option 2 preferred: 3 • Undecided/ Unclear: 3 Approximation of Combined Results Option 1: 178 (35%) • In-person - 90 (64%) • Online - 88 (24%) Option 2: 330 (65%) • In-person - 50 (36%) • Online - 280 (77%) Online Open House (8/24/2016-9/7/2016) • 1,057 visitors • 379 responses • 88 Prefer Option 1(23.9%) • 280 Prefer Option 2 (76.1%) Age Over 70: 38 (17.7%) • 45-69:81 (37.7%) 30-44:80 (37.2%) • 18-29: 7 (3.3%) • Under 18:5 (2.3%) Participants in the In -Person Open House small group discussion, 38 Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Master Plan Feedback (see detailed summary in Appendix) Most consistent comments across both Open Houses • Like the lawn terraces • Skatepark should remain in the park • Option 1 curves are nice but want more active program like in Option 2 Common reasons respondents preferred Option 1 • Free-flowing structure, layout Walking paths • Water feature and plaza Open green spaces and lawn Reduced number of petanque courts No track Common elements not shown that respondents would like to see • Additional restrooms • Benches and/orseatingareas Lighting • Additional covered athletic facility and market space • Stage • ADA accessibility • 400-metertrack Common reasons respondents preferred Option 2 View terraces Long walking and running paths Focus on fields and athletic facilities • Expanded Boys and Girls Club • Skate park Potential for large events More spaces for families and children Track �,,iia�,o fiYo �aV�aur road ,� E��r,„�irroirrui,o°oii II o�� f�p,uva�u�r 39 40 41 HYBRID DESIGN The refined park plan features recreation and activities for all ages in a beautiful park setting. The plan includes three different zones that each provide a unique experience: "The Meadows", "The Great Lawn" and "The Market Promenade". The Meadows provide both passive and active enjoyment and encourage exploration. This area of the park includes gently roiling Elis, meandering paths, and landscaped buffers at ail residential edges of the park. Special features include a'/a miie measured walking/jogging path, playground, skatepark, picnic lawn, youth climbing wall and exercise areas setwithin planted areas and low berms. The Great Lawn is designed to support soccer in multiple configurations as well as other field sports and casual recreation. Lawn terraces offer mountain views and provide spectator seating for field events, concerts and festivals alike. Street improvements to 6th Avenue are seamlessly integrated with the park's western edgeto provide a generous promenade - style sidewalk for markets, parades and festivals. A multi -use plaza and shade pavilion, with restrooms and storage, provide space for outdoor seating, water play, interactive art, and the potential to host small performances, and civic events. The existing Field House continues to serve the Boys and Girls Club as conversations continue about the potential for expansion or new construction. A 12,000 SF addition to the existing Field House is delineated on the Master Plan as a potential option congruous with the park design. The 6th Street area also includes a range of multi -use recreation spaces: petanque and multi -use courts fortennis, basketball and pickleball. The park is designed to be flexible and accommodates a substantial amount of activity, but will also be beautiful at quieter times. All paths are accessible, and park and sport lighting will be provided throughout. The park is also designed to be economically and environmentally sustainable- multiple locations are identified for stormwater treatment and careful consideration will be given to site conditions and amenities needed to support recreation and event use. The Petanque Grove features six full-size petanque courts to support both the Edmonds Petanque Club and the greater community. Located at the southwest corner of the park and the 6th Avenue promenade, the Grove will serve as a community cornerstone and welcoming gateway defined by aggregate courts set within seasonal planting beds, shade trees and integrated seating. 42 Edmonds Civic: Coater iaiayfield Master Plain How we responded to what we heard: Top 10 activities (from Included in Open House #1) Votes Hybrid Plan restrooms 77 petanque 76 jogging/walking paths 71 soccer 67 shade trees 56 skate park 50 playground 50 tennis 49 Boys &Girls Club 48 multi -use lawn 42 formal track 40 small performance space 39 gardens 35 From total list of 40 activities, 36 are accommodated in the hybrid plan Themes / Priorities as voted on by the community and carefully considered in the hybrid plan: 1st: Active 2nd: Passive 3rd: Civic Aerial View Examples of Signature Features The following images, from existing parks, are intended to give a sense of the general character of the proposed features. Gardens with Integrated Play Creative Play Grounds & Water Feature Market Promenade & Plaza Berms Jogging/walking paths with all -a Youth Climbing Wall exercise stations �n .a •„� ,",y.P,v% 43 FRAMEWORK COMMUNITY HUBS 44 Edmonds Civic Center Playfield Master Plan CONNECTIONS Boys & Girls Club The continued presence of the Boys and Girls Club at Civic Center Playfield is desired by all parties. Conversation with the Club is ongoing to determine a short and long term solution that will allow the Boys and Girls Club to remain at Civic Center Playfield and to grow and integrate facilities as the park develops. Two options for potential Club expansion were proposed by the design team and presented at Open House 3 (see page 50, Architectural Elements, for details). Option one, a 12,000 SF extension with possible renovation of the existing field house, is delineated on the preferred site plan. The potential expansion, it's location, scale and relationship to the park and the field house, will be further reviewed and developed in the next phase of design. PREFERRED SITE PLAN �} art &stormwateropportunity j tennis/multi-use court (optional outlined) '4) 1/3 mile jogging&walking path 4 exercise station youth climbing wall )picnic meadow ..',. ( berms playground (`9 view terraces i �a stormwater gardens �i field lighting 0 ) petanque grove shade pavilion, restrooms &storage 04 multi -use plaza with water feature or interactive art rs�) Boys and Girls Club or cafe & concessions as" multi -use court (potential 12,000 SF Boys & Girls Club expansion) Xr skatepark ' multi -use playfields �� ,.n' 45 MASTER PLAN VIEWS Youth Stormwater Sprague Street Meadow Climbing Gardens Field Lighting** Multi -use Lawn Playground Connector Planting Wall Viewing Terraces 1/3 "Oe Berms Picnic Exercise JoggingWalking Meadow Stations a:Io ** Number of posts and placement to be determined Multi -use Court Shade Pavilion Plaza, Field House (Potential Boys 6th Ave Market with Restrooms Interactive Art or (Boys & & Girls Club Art Promenade & Storage Water Feature Girls Club) Expansion) Opportunity Petanque Groves Skatepark Stormwater Multi -use Court Gardens PhGla;i ;-Y'rc y ° p3,pstrou 47 MASTER PLAN EVENT OVERLAYS Small to Medium Size Events Within the Park Significant community and stakeholder interest was expressed in hosting more small to medium size events and performances at the park. The 6th Avenue plaza and promenade areas, Petanque grove, picnic meadow, lawn terraces and corresponding playfield were all designed as flexible use spaces that could be ideal for a variety of smaller -scale gatherings, concerts, performances, markets or events. The final park design will also provide distributed utility services for facilitating all scales of event use. 48 nY9e)v7>; > Ziga x:. f. r v`t 9i, N;I'jfN0d plar Large Events and the 6th Avenue Market Promenade The park has a long-standing tradition of hostingsome of the city's most iconic large events. The new park pian offers a large amount of flexible use space that can accommodate festivals, markets, parades and more. The maximum amount of area for a single large event is outlined below and demonstrates the ability of the park to accommodate key existing program elements for the Taste of Edmonds. Conversations are ongoing with the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce and other stakeholders on the potential reconfiguration of the Taste of Edmonds, the Edmonds Arts Festival and the 4th of July parade and fireworks to best utilize the new park design. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS Boys and Girls Club Expansion The Boys and Girls Club has been occupying the field house since 1968 and have expressed a preference to remain in the park. However, with the current enrollment of 150 children, they have reached full capacity in the 9,500 SF facility. Typical Boys and Girls Club facilities range from 18-25,000 SF and the Club will need more space if it is to continue to grow. Atthetime ofthe master plan, there was no formal long-range plan for the Club expansion or relocation but the design team explored Club facility expansion options that could be integrated and/or phased -in with the new design. Owen Richards Architecture (ORA) created conceptual massing studies for two options - a 12,000 SF expansion that creates an entry courtyard adjacent to the existing Field House, and a 20,0000 SF alternative building. Creating integrated indoor/outdoor spaces, a bright new gym and open and inviting volumes that could both complement and offset the Field House were a priority. BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OPTION 1- PREFERRED MASSING STUDY FOR 12,000 SF EXPANSION 50 Edmonds Civic Center Piayfield Master Plar The proposed building locations and footprints were presented for discussion and feedback at Open House 3 and the consensus was that the larger footprint in option 2 consumed too much of the park. The smaller footprint is shown in the Preferred Master Plan for future discussion as the park design advances. BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OPTION 2 MASSING STUDY FOR 20,000 SF EXPANSION ENLARGED SITE PLAN Shade Pavilion A new shade pavilion and restrooms were strongly supported by the community. The design team was primarily focused on the scale and siting of the structure but also began to explore its potential character and ability to serve as gateway to the park and iconic gathering space. Potential uses include seating area, market cover and other small performance or event use. MASSING STUDY FOR SHADE PAVILION WITH RESTROOMS Examples of Signature Features The following images, from existing pavilions, are intended to give a sense of the general character of the proposed structure. 'P['Oo' 51 OPEN HOUSE 3, OCTOBER, 2016 (see detailed summary in Appendix) Format The meeting consisted of opening remarks by Mayor Dave Earl ing, a presentation by the design team, a brief Q&A session and an open house during which attendees were able to: Discuss the hybrid design and design elements with other members of the community « Provide feedback on the hybrid design to the project staff Ask questions and La':k with project staff a -d PAC members Submit written comments about the hybrid design The following questions were asked as a starting point for in- person feedback and discussion as well as online comments: Please share your thoughts, what do you like or dislike about the plan? Which elements of the new park design would bring you to the park most often? Are there park elements not shown thatyou would like to see? Additional Comments were encouraged. F rsL draftofthe nybrd master pian t hat vvas presented and discussed at Open House #3. Principals Lara Rose and Chris Jones of Walker Macy and participants at Open House 3 discussing the Hybrid Plan during the Q&A session, 52 Fdaaea ads, Civaae CFmtiex- Playfield luster Plan Participation and Attendance (see detoiledsummory in Appendix) In -Person Open House October 19, 2016 • Approximately 101 attended Online Open House October 19 - November 4, 2016 • 347 visitors (majority were nearby residents who had not attended any of the in-person Open Houses • 156 responses Age Range: • Over 70: 6 (7.4%) • 45-69:39 (48.1%) • 30-44:33 (40.7%) • 18-29: 0 (0%) • Under 18: 2 (2.5%) A broad range of comments were received, similar to prior feedback. • Like the integrated activities • Like the curves, paths, and passive areas • Northern skatepark location is an issue for residents • We should leave the parkas is • Good compromise; thoughtful incorporation of community feedback • Not enough sports/playfields and too much passive area • Not enough passive area and too much sports/playfields • Petanque grove is nice but would like larger tournament area • Formal track should be included • Like the 1/3 mile walking/jogging path • 6th Avenue market promenade and plaza will be a great asset • Concerns abol.i� buflfers, noise, dogs, lighting and other design details Overall sentiment was that the hybrid plan is successful at incorporating community feedback and will be a great asset to the city. I don't like.. PHASING Potential implementation could be considered in three phases with the flexibility to prioritize these phases in any order depending on ,3.ie W�_ iy � VAS d � gC�. .. c J �u''C�'ICS C' �^C � �S'�Cg \ C� C �� i 5 i �C y uE e "g Of' t'?C O(CIC' Cvf�SUUCtIOn as described below: Phase A includes the more civic uses of the park up to the back -of -curb along 6th Avenue. This area includes a majority of park's hardscape as well as the architectural features and the Petanque Grove, (Note: if this phase follows Phase C, it is recommended that the park side portion of the promenade be completed along with 6th Avenue). ase .. S � e ea: _ - a � a"G nvo ves . e r; -�.g a..f ...d so C ,cscaoe ea�.,'es aS we ;7 S ti `c ^c Ji'CeL connection and the sidewalk along 7th Avenue. (Note, if this phase precedes PhoseA itis recommended that the Sprague Street connection be completed all the way to 6th Avenue). Phase C represents the 6th Avenue "Market Promenade" from back -of -curb on the park side and includes the pedestrian crossings at Sprague Street and the full right-of-way for all edges not along the park. (Note: if Phase Cprecedes Phase A it is recommended that the park -side portion of the promenade be completed along with the 6th Avenue improvements). 54 ,i �, � ,, � v I ;"), � "�Na I f ^r,n SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Alley Buffers The design team has proposed that the existing 8' chain link fence that surrounds the park be removed. The fence was erected while the property served as school grounds and is in poor condition. Community concerns were raised about buffering between the park interior and the residential alleys to the north and south of the site for safety and security purposes. The design team has advised that dense planting offers a more inviting and attractive condition while still providing effective buffers. The suggested condition below demonstrates a 14' minimum width. City Council voted in favor of replacing the fence with a vegetated buffer.' PROPOSED TYPICAL BUFFER SECTION ",114"," Planted Berms Utilities and City Planning 8' Jogging I.- 14' Min. 17' Walking Path Planted Buffer Alley New stormwater code is scheduled to be published in January, 2017. Alignment with this plan will happen in the Design Development phase of the Civic Center Playfield. The city is planning to install a new sewer line between 6th and 7th Avenues that would cross Civic Center Playfield from east to west within the old Edmonds Street right-of-way. There is flexibility on the exact location within that zone and the park design will collaborate with the Edmonds Public Works and Utilities department to determine the final locations of any structures and assess other impacts to the park design. Parking Considerations Parking concerns were raised as a discussion point in several of the Civic Center Playfield Master Plan meetings and Open Houses. The consensus of the community was that park property should be retained as public open space and not allocated to parking. The design team has recommended that parallel street parking along 6th and 7th Avenues remain with further study to determine amount and locations for designated ADA and loading access a reas. The suggestion of back -in angle parking was made but the design team feels strongly thatthis causes pedestrian and vehicularsafety concerns as well as negatively impacts the park edge condition. It is highly recommended that the City of Edmonds undertake a city- wide parking study to identify needs and determine options. The design team also recommends that bus transit routes be reviewed to consider a future bus stop at Civic Center Playfield. Tennis / Sports Fencing The adjacent residential community expressed concerns about the high fencing around the tennis courts and the potential to obstruct views. The design team responded with examples of fencing with low visual impacts that was well received. phn'o"i 55 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 6th Avenue Market Promenade The 6th Avenue/Market Promenade is envisioned as a 'Festival Street' that could host special events through temporary closure to vehlcular traffic_ The proposed right-of-way features a raised roadway that is level with the surrounding sidewalk between Daley and Bell Streets to create a more pedestrian - friendly park edge and entrance. The street would incorporate special paving, flush curbs, street trees, planting and space for market tents and other activities. Additional benefits include: y Providing clear connections between the park, downtown Edmonds and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Balancing the uses of the street for walking, driving, transit, cycling, emergency services, parking, drop-offs, etc. Creating an attractive and engaging gateway to the park. Traffic calming to promote safety of pedestrians and vehicles. SECTION A: 6TH AVENUE MARKET PROMENADE SECTION KEY MAP r P P 1p 10 _..._.._._..�.__.36' ..... .. r .............._..._ 56 Edmonds Civic Center PlayfipH Master P�an f p r I � Iyn A 44 I 4 ITT 1, p Note: Existing conditions and dimensions are approximate. N i .,- X LU } b N k j°' SECTION KEY MAP r P P 1p 10 _..._.._._..�.__.36' ..... .. r .............._..._ 56 Edmonds Civic Center PlayfipH Master P�an f p r I � Iyn A 44 I 4 ITT 1, p Note: Existing conditions and dimensions are approximate. 7th Avenue looking north at Edmonds Street SECTION B: 7TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS 7th Avenue Street Improvements The existing sidewalk and street trees along 7th Avenue place the pedestrians on a narrow sidewalk at the edge of the curb. The master plan recommends that the lane widths be reconsidered to allovv the street Trees and p'.anung.c create a buffer between the curb and the sidewalk. Curb bump -outs and a designated pedestrian street crossing at the Sprague Street Connector entrance would also provide safer and more direct park access for residents. CI p ! J; 4 ! d! ! Oy t I N V Y ..� II o ! Exisling Grade 8' m 8' 1� ... 12' Note: Existing conditions and dimensions are approximate. a 57