PLN198300007-2983MAE:jt
2/13/84
PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 679
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA-
TIONS OF THE EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD ON PROPOSED
ZONING REGULATION DESIGNATED BY EDMONDS FILE
NO. R-7-83.
After notice had been duly posted and published
pursuant to Section 20.40.030 of the Edmonds Community
Development Code the Edmonds Planning Board held a public
hearing on January 11, 1984 to consider Planning Division File
No. R-7-83, proposed zoning regulations for an area located in
Snohomish County adjacent to the Edmonds City limits which is
generally south of 222nd Street S.W., east of 80th Avenue West
and 78th Avenue West, and west of 76th Avenue West. The
proposed zoning regulation would be to adopt single-family
residential zone RS-8 upon annexation of such area.
The City staff made a presentation and submitted
documents for the Planning Board review. Members of the
public were given an opportunity to speak and after all
members who desired to speak had done so the public portion of
the meeting was closed. Following the discussion by the
Planning Board, Board member Larson moved that the Planning
Board recommend a modified approval of R-7-83 and that the
staff report to the Planning Board on this matter be adopted
as a portion of the Board's findings and conclusions with the
exception of those regarding minimum lot size. This motion
was duly seconded by Board member Hogin and was passed
unanimously by the board, now, therefore,
THE EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Planning Board finds that the subject
property as described in Exhibit "A" is currently located in a
multiple family residential area with lot sizes varying from
6,000 square feet to 7,200 square feet, with the exception of
the Esperance Elementary School, and conclude that an RS-6
zone classification with the exception of the Esperance school
property would be consistent with the existing surrounding
development to the west of the Esperance Elementary School.
Additionally, the Planning Board finds that an RS-6 zone
classification will create the least number of non -conforming
lots upon any future annexation of the area.
2. That the Planning Board finds that the Esperance
School property as described in Exhibit "A" currently consists
of the Esperance school situated on a large open field, and
concludes that an RS-8 zone classification would be consistent
with the surrounding area should there be any single family
development on that land.
3. That the Planning Board adopt by reference the
following portions of the Staff Report to the Planning Board
for R-7-83: Part III A, B, and C, 1 through 5, a copy of
which is set forth as Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
- 2 -
4. That it be recommended to the City Council that a
proposed zoning classification of RS-6 and RS-8 as outlined in
Exhibit "A" be adopted for the subject property to become
effective upon future annexation of property within the
subject area.
J
DATED this day
- 3 -
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525
CITY ATTORNEY
March 29, 1984
Teresa Quigley
Planning Department
Edmonds Civic Center
Edmonds, WA 98020
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
Re: Planning Board Resolution:
R-7-83
Dear Teresa:
Enclosed please find the original of the Planning Board
resolution regarding R-7-83 with the corrections you
requested.
Very truly yours,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Jane Tabaka
Mark Eames secretary
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525
CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Duane Bowman
Assistant City Planner
Edmonds Civic Center
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Duane:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
February 13, 1984 q B
17
Re: Planning Board Resolution
for File R-7-83
Enclosed is the Planning Board resolution for the
simultaneous zoning of the Esparence Elementary School
property. There are two exhibits for this resolution, the
first of which, Exhibit "A", is a map of the proposed
annexation showing the portion which will be zoned RS-6 and
the portion which will be zoned RS-8. This Exhibit "A" needs
to be prepared by your office. Also, Exhibit "B" is a portion
of your Staff Report which was adopted by the Planning Board.
That is also enclosed with this letter.
Please see that all the necessary exhibits are attached
to the resolution and that Ken Mattson reviews this resolution
for his signature at his earliest convenience. After this
resolution is signed it will be ready for submittal to the
City Council after a 75% annexation petition has been
received.
On another matter, I have researched the question of the
extent to which school property is counted when determining
the sufficiency of a 75% petition. The statute, RCW
35A.14.120 states that a petition "must be signed by the
owners, as defined by RCW 35A.01.040(9)(a) through (d), of not
less than 75% in value, according to the assessed valuation
for general taxation of the property for which annexation is
petitioned." Thus all property that has an assessed valuation
is included. I contacted the Snohomish County Assessor's
office and learned that the school property does, indeed, have
an assessed valuation for the land and the buildings,
therefore its value must be included in calculating the
sufficiency of the 75% petition.
Duane Bowman
February 13, 1984
Page 2
Please contact me if you have any further questions
regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Mark A. Eames
MAE:jt
Enclosure
cc: Irene Varney Moran
THESE MINUTES SUBJECT
TO JANU 25 APPROVAL
c`
PLANNING BOARD
January 11, 1984
The regular meeting of the Planning Board was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman
Ken Mattson in the Plaza Meeting Room of the Edmonds Library.
PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Ken Mattson Ann Derleth, Alt. Duane Bowman, Asst. City Planner
Dave Larson Richard Kirschner Mark Eames, City Attorney
John Hodgin Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk
Bob Boye
Mr. Kirschner's absence was excused because he was out of town on business.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CHAIRMAN MATTSON MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HODGIN, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24,
1983. MOTION CARRIED. MR. BOYE MOVED, SECONDED BY CHAIRMAN MATTSON, TO APPROVE THE
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 9, 1983. MOTION CARRIED. Approval of the minutes of December
14, 1983 was deferred until the next meeting because they were distributed this
evening.
STAFF AND PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS
Mr. Bowman reminded the Board of its meeting with the City Council on January 24 and
he suggested that they prepare written policy statements to present to the Council.
He thought they may also want to discuss with the Council the policies regarding
annexation, as brought up at the last meeting by Mr. Larson.
Mr. Bowman advised that Ms. Derleth probably will be resigning from the Board because
her family is moving to eastern Washington.
Chairman Mattson inquired about funds for the Planning Board, and Mr. Bowman said
there is some money set aside in the Council Contingency Fund for long-range planning
for the Planning Board.
Mr. Larson expressed appreciation for the new microphones.
AGENDA
R-7-W CITY OF EDMONDS - Consideration of simultaneous zoning on an area located
in Snohomish County adjacent to the City of Edmonds. The area under con-
sideration is generally located south of 222nd St. S.W., east of 80th Ave.
W.and 78th Ave. W., and west of 76th Ave. W. Under the request the area
would, upon annexation, be zoned from RR-8400 in Snohomish County to RS-8
in the City of Edmonds.
The proposed annexation area is comprised of 27.14 acres and has 50 residences
within it. Also included is the old Esperance Elementary School which
currently is leased to Women's Aglow Fellowship International, a religious
organization. Surrounding development to the north and west is single-
family residential, to the east is a mixture of multi -family and commercial,
and to the south is commercial. Mr. Bowman addressed the rezone criteria.
As to whether the zoning change conforms with the Comprehensive Plan, he
said the Comprehensive Plan Map designates the subject property as a mixture
of single-family/high-density residential. Development in the area is
single-family residential. As to consistency with the purposes of the
Zoning Ordinance, he said the area is completely developed into single-
family development, except for the old elementary school, and the existing
RR-8400 zoning is generally consistent with the City's RS-8 zoning. As to
the relationship of the proposed zoning change to existing land uses and
zoning of surrounding or nearby property, he said the proposed RS-8 zoning
is consistent with the single-family development that has occurred in the
area. As to whether there has been sufficient change in the character of
the immediate or surrounding area or in City policy to justify the rezone,
he said the City is required to establish the zoning classification for the
area upon annexation and the proposed RS-8 zone is the proper classifica-
tion. As to whether the property is suitable both economically and physically
for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and under the proposed
zoning, he said the area is fully developed, with the exception of the old
Esperance Elementary School, and any development other than single-family
residential will be limited to those conditional uses listed in Section
16.20.010(C)(1) and he read those aloud. As to relative gain to the public
health, safety, and welfare, compared to the potential increase or decrease
in value to the property owners, he said this proposal will zone the subject
area to a classification which is comparable to the RR-8400 County zoning.
Mr. Bowman said there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts
associated with this proposal, and a declaration of nonsignificance has
been issued. He recommended approval of the proposal.
Mr. Larson asked what the pattern is of the multiple zoning along 76th, and
Mr. Bowman responded that there is a strip just north of this area from
222nd to 220th, and from that point it is single-family. Also, on the east
side of 76th it is multi -family and adjacent to Highway 99 is general
commercial. Mr. Hodgin did not understand how Edmonds could bring school
district property into the City and zone it single-family. Mr. Bowman said
if they decide to come into the City, the City is charged with establishing
a zone classification, and the school district can participate in the
process and seek a specific zoning. He said the school district was aware
of this evening's hearing. Chairman Mattson observed that the school
district property is currently zoned RR-8400 so it is single-family now,
and he noted that schools and churches are typically in residential zones.
Mr. Bowman noted that the particular use of the Women's Aglow association
would be considered nonconforming in the City, so they would have to bring
that into compliance within 15 years of the date they became nonconforming
if that use continues, unless a Code amendment were to allow such uses with
a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Eames added that the Code provides for an
extension of the 15-year period by application to the Hearing Examiner and
presentation of facts that would justify it, and they would have one year
to make the request.
Chairman Mattson objected to the last rezone criterion regarding relative
gain to the public health, safety, and welfare, saying that is never answered
satisfactorily. The hearing then was opened.
The audience was advised that the annexation issue was not being heard this
evening, only the zoning if the area should annex.
Shirley Homanick, 22322 76th W. said there are about 50 residences involved
and only 8 are over 8,400 sq. ft. Hers is the smallest with 6,000 sq. ft.
Mr. Bowman described the parcels, noting two which are approximately 8,100
sq. ft., parcels within a PRO which are 6,000 sq. ft., those along 224th
and along 76th which are 6,000 - 7,200 sq. ft., and those to the north
which are over 8,000 sq. ft. He said those which do not meet the minimum
lot requirements would be considered nonconforming, but they are also
nonconforming in Snohomish County under the RR-8400 zoning. Mr. Eames
noted that there are different kinds of nonconformity and if two adjoining
lots are in common ownership they would be considered as one large lot and
could be resubdivided to try to make conforming lots. He noted that a
house on a nonconforming lot is not necessarily a nonconforming house. Mr.
Larson asked if RS-6 had been considered for this, and Mr. Bowman said it
had, as well as some multi -family zoning, but it has been the City's policy,
upon annexation, to give people the same or comparable zoning which they
had in the County.
John Richmond, representing the Edmonds School District, said they are
concerned about the implications of the new zoning on the school and its
potential uses in the future. He said the district has a number of schools
which are excessive to its current needs, and this is an unanticipated
situation but a national phenomenon. He believed a solution could be
worked out which will meet the needs of both the school district and the
City. He was asked if he had a suggestion for the school district property,
other than RS, and he said perhaps the Conditional Use Permit process would
allow assurance for the City and still allow the school district to get
income from the property. He said they see the possibility of dividing the
property, and the school building is separate from the rest of the grounds,
so the grounds would be zoned with the surrounding property. He said they
want to be reasonable and appreciate the fact that the City is sympathetic
to their situation.
Carol Ostby, 7726 224th S.W., said she had lived there for 30 years and the
annexation issue is an emotional one. She asked for those who have small
PLANNING BOARD
Page 2 - January 11, 1984
businesses in their homes, if they should be forced into Edmonds, what it
would do to them. Mr. Bowman explained the home occupation provisions of
the Edmonds Code.
Marillen Bouck, 7720 224th S.W., asked what the steps on annexations are
that would be presented to her as a taxpayer. Mr. Eames explained the
annexation process.
Willard Rawlins, 22419 78th W., asked if the annexation would be dropped if
the 75% petition was not attained. Mr. Bowman explained that if they
cannot obtain the 75% within six months the petition is invalid and they
would have to start the process again. Mr. Rawlins asked if they would be
taxed for sewers and water if the annexation should go through, since they
had already paid for them. Mr. Bowman explained that they would not pay
twice, and he said the main difference they would notice was that they
would pay their bill to the City of Edmonds rather than the water district.
William A. Leu, 22418 77th W., asked if they would be able to vote on the
annexation. Mr. Eames explained the petition method of annexation. The
hearing then was closed.
Mr. Larson felt the County zoning may not have been appropriate because of
the commercial zone to the south, the multi -family zone to the east and
northeast, the configuration of the existing single-family lots, and the
current use of the former elementary school which he thought provided as
good neighbors as could be found in the way of school tenants. He wondered
if it would not be better to have more than one zone in the area. He
thought part of it should be RS-6 and part multiple family. He noted that
nobody in the audience indicated whether they would prefer multiple on
76th, and said he is always reluctant to impose multiple on single-family
property because it may affect their taxes, but if they expect to convert
their property within a few years this may be the time to consider it.
Also, he said in a multiple -family zone there is more opportunity for
Conditional Use Permits, particularly for service businesses. Mr. Bowman
said in the multi -family zone there would be the possibility of professional
type offices. Mr. Bowman agreed that there are some areas that appear to
have the potential for multi -family, such as on 76th, but he said to place
multi -family zoning on the school property would be pushing that zoning
into the definite single-family area. Mr. Boye thought that to bring in
multi -family at this time would confuse an already emotional issue, but he
was amenable to RS-6. Chairman Mattson recognized his point, but he said
multiple would be a better buffer and would make good planning sense on
76th, but he agreed it would be a problem to bring it into the issue at
this time. Mr. Bowman noted that a change to RS-6 would not change the
overall area. -Instead of 7 1/2' side setback it would be 5' and instead of
25' street setback it would be 20'. He said he could canvass the neighborhood
and determine what the people think. Mr. Boye thought that would give the
impression that the City is aggressive on this annexation when actually at
this point it is only responding to the requests of the people. Mr. Larson
was persuaded by Mr. Boye that it would muddy the water. THEREFORE, MR.
LARSON MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HODGIN, THAT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMEND TO
THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IN THE EVENT OF ANNEXATION OF THIS AREA WHICH IS
COVERED UNDER R-7-83 THAT THE ENTIRE AREA BE ZONED RS-6 FOR THE REASON THAT
RS-6 ZONING MOST CLOSELY APPROXIMATES THE SIZE LOTS OF THE MAJORITY OF THE
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND INCORPORATING ALL THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDA-
TIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MINIMUM SIZE LOTS AND DELETING #6 OF THE FINDINGS
OF FACT (PERTAINING TO RELATIVE GAIN TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND
WELFARE). Chairman Mattson asked if part of the school property should be
RS-8- It was noted that this issue will be emotional enough without having
more than one zone, but Mr. Bowman thought it would be more advisable to
place RS-8 on the school property, saying the area most suitable for RS-6
is the area west of the school, north of 224th and south of 222nd. He said
if the school property should develop into single-family there would be
smaller lots adjacent to the RS-8 by the school. MR. LARSON AMENDED HIS
MOTION, ACCEPTABLE TO THE SECOND, TO RECOMMEND THAT THE SCHOOL PROPERTY BE
ZONED RS-8. THE MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED.
Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Dr., commended the City on the process it was
going through. He said if he were in that area he would want to know what
to expect if he were going to be annexed to the City, and he hoped that
before this reached the City Council that there would be a discussion
regarding parks in the City and long-range planning for parks. He said if
PLANNING BOARD
Page 3 - January 11, 1984
the school is closed a playground would be lost and he would rather see
that open space changed to OS zoning. Mr. Larson noted that the Board had
made the recommendation on the last annexation and it was not accepted.
Mr. Hertrich thought they should do it again.
CDC-4-83 CITY OF EDMONDS - Amendments to Sections 15.38.100, 15.38.110, and 15.38.150
of the Community Development Code (Shoreline Master Program), removing the
limitation for only open pile bulkheads in the urban environment, allowing
breakwaters in the urban environment only in the Commercial Waterfront
Zone, and allowing dredging for the purpose of creating moorage in the
Commercial Waterfront Zone in the urban, conservancy, and natural environments.
The reason for this proposed action was that the Port of Edmonds applied
for a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit to expand moorage
by an additional 116 slips. To complete the project approximately 84,000
cu. yds. of material will have to be dredged and a new harbor entrance
built. Some Code changes are required to allow what they propose. Regarding
Section 15.38.100 having to do with bulkheads, subsection A.5. states that
"Bulkheads should be of an open pile construction wherever possible," and
the proposal was to delete that. In Section 15.38.110 having to do with
breakwaters, subsection A. states that "Future breakwater construction
shall be of a nonpermanent, temporary nature; i.e., floating breakwaters."
The proposed language change is "Breakwaters shall be permitted subject to
all applicable state and federal regulations and shall be limited to those
areas located in the commercial waterfront (CW) zone." Regarding Section
15.38.150 having to do with dredging, dredging is not permitted in the
natural environments in the current Code, and the proposal -was to amend
subsection A. to provide that dredging "shall be carried out only for the
purpose of creating moorage in the commercial waterfront (CW) zone, main-
taining safe navigation or natural character." Mr. Bowman said they wanted
the ability to do some very limited dredging in the natural environments,
but protecting the natural character. He said it is clear that the proposed
marine expansion is consistent with the City's overall objectives.
Herb Carpenter of Reid, Middleton & Associates reviewed the improvement of
the waterfront over the past five years and said expansion of the mid -
marina area is the last step in the overall Port improvement. They have
only a window of approximately six weeks in which they can do the addition
to the breakwater because of the limitation on when they can drive piles. In
answer to questions, he said the Corps of Engineers is a critical agency
for the permit and the permit will not be issued until the shorelines
permit is issued. Mr. Boye saw no problems after questioning Mr. Carpenter,
and he said it appeared Mr. Bowman had gone through the Code and made the
proper changes. Mr. Larson spoke in favor of public viewing areas so it
can be enjoyed by the nonboating public also. He mentioned the elevated
walkway at Waterfront Park in Seattle, and tor. Bowman responded that public
viewing areas will be addressed in the Substantial Development Permit. Mr.
Carpenter said when the project is finished the public will be able to walk
the entire waterfront.
Dick Cole, attorney for the Port, said that at the public hearings there
were requests for overnight moorage and there was support from people who
have been on the moorage waiting list for years. He noted that the fishing
pier offers a good opportunity for viewing the waterfront area.
John Olson, of Reid, Middleton & Associates, said they are trying to protect
the harbor from the severest waves which are from the northwest, and that
is why the configuration was developed. He noted that there is protection
somewhat from southwest weather by the breakwater, and steel was chosen
because of the configuration of the bottom, but rock would be preferable.
The water is too deep for a timber structure. He said the Coast Guard will
review the lighting. He was questioned about "open pile construction"
which is proposed to be deleted from the Code, and he said no one has a
definition for that. The hearing was opened.
Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Dr., said that at the Port's public hearing
there was not a unanimous feeling in favor of this development. He said a
lot of other people would favor something else for the last piece of property
on the waterfront. He noted that there is no boat launch facility for
small boats and he thought the Port should provide more public access to
the water. He said the proposed Code changes do not specify that they are
only for the Port's benefit, so anyone else could have a similar development.
PLANNING BOARD
Page 4 - January 11, 1984
PLEASE -P,RMK. YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM
R-7-83 CITY OF EDMONDS
CONSIDERATION OF SIMULTANEOUS ZONING ON AN AREA LOCATED IN
SNOHOMISH COUNTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS. THE AREA
UNDER RECONSIDERATION IS GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 222ND
ST. S.W., EAST OF 80TH AVE. W. AND 78TH AVE. W., AND WEST OF
76TH AVE. W. UNDER THE REQUEST, THE AREA WOULD, UPON ANNEXA-
TION, BE ZONED FROM RR-8400 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY TO RS-8 (SI:NGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS.
/ NAME
v
ARIA
sc"�
C ou, c,,-'
IS)
✓ oAl T . 1P�R/�
HEARING DATE; 1/11/84
ADDRESS
a?a3a17-
.?�')ga6
EDMON0S
�i;�6- as �jt1c)
77 W
S&wopL,
4'
L olyo/yos
rbAAnb s -
7 7c3 -z-2/,/ Z&' s Ts 54; . 0iyemlPS
M
n
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING BOARD
FILE #R-7-83
HEARING DATE: JANUARY 11, 1984
I. REQUESTED ACTION:
Consideration of simultaneous zoning on an area located in Sno-
homish County adjacent to the City of Edmonds. The area under
reconsideration is generally located south of 222nd St. S.W.,
east of 80th Ave. W. and 78th Ave. W., and west of 76th Ave. W.
Under the request, the area would, upon annexation, be zoned
from RR-8400 in Snohomish County to RS-8 (single-family resi-
dential) in the City of Edmonds.
II. PROPONENT:
City of Edmonds
240 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
III. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:
A. Description of Subject Property and Surrounding Area
The proposed annexation area contains 27.14 acres. There are
50 residences located in the area. Also included is the old
Esperance Elementary School, which is currently leased to
Women's Aglow Fellowship International, a religious organi-
zation.
Surrounding development to the north and west is single-family
residential. To the east is a mixture of multiple -family and
commercial. The area to the south is commercial.
B. Official
Street Map
Proposed R/W
Existing R/W
222nd
St. S.W.
60'
60'
224th
St. S.W.
60'
60'
77th
Ave. W.
60'
60'
78th
Ave. W.
60'
60'
80th
Ave. W.
60'
60'
C. Rezone Criteria
1. Does the proposed zoning change conform with the Compre-
hensive Plan?
The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the subject property
Staff Report to the Planning Board
File #R-7-83/Hearing Date: 1/11/84
Page 2
as a mixture of single-family/high-density residential.
Development in the area is single-family residential.
2. Is the proposed zoning consistent with the purposes of
the Zoning Ordinance?
The subject area is completely developed into single-
family development, with the exception of the old ele-
mentary school. The RR-8400 classification is generally
consistent with the City's RS-8 zoning.
3. What is the relationship of the proposed zoning change to
existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby
property?
The proposed RS-8 zoning is consistent with the single-
family development that has occurred in the area.
4. Has there been sufficient changes in the character of
the immediate or surrounding area or in City policy to
justify the rezone?
The City is required to establish the property zoning
classification for the area upon annexation. The pro-
posed RS-8 zone is the proper.zone classification.
5. Is the property suitable both economically and physically
for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and under
the proposed zoning?
The subject area is fully developed, with the exception
of the old Esperance Elementary School. Any development
of this property, other than single-family residential,
will be limited to those conditional uses. listed in Sec-
tion 16.20.010(C)(1).
6. What is the relative gain to the public health, safety,
and welfare compared to the potential increase or de-
crease in value to the property owners?
This proposal will zone the subject area to a classifica-
tion which is comparable to the RR-8400 county zoning.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING
There will be no significant adverse impacts associated with this
proposal, and a declaration of nonsignificance has been issued.
Staff Report to the Planning Board
File #R-7-83/Hearing Date: 1/11/84
Page 3
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the staff that R-7-83 be approved.
DVB/tq
1/06/84
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS
to
ZONING ORDINANCE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
FILE R-7-83
DATE 12/29/83
FEE_ N/A RECT N/A
ENV. ASSESSMENT FEE
ENV. CHECKLIST RECVD ( see AX-6-83)
HEARING DATE January 11 , 1984
PROCEDURE: Applications are sent to the
P anning Advisory Board for hearing. The Board will accept, reject, or
revise the proposal contained in the application. This Board action will
be forwarded to the City Council in the form of a Resolution. After the
City Council receives the Resolution from the Planning Advisory Board,
they will set a public hearing date for the final disposition of the
case. The Council may confirm, reject, or modify any decision of the
Planning Advisory Board.
APPLICANT: City of Edmonds PHONE: 771-3202, ext. 254
ADDRESS: 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. XXKXEJM9a1 DDmY91XBX]tRWX (Line
out incorrect title). In the case of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
describe the "use" designations to be changed (single-family), multi-
family, commercial, etc.) and the phvsical areas involved.
Simultaneous zoning for annexation AX-6-83 to zone the annexation area from RR-8400
to RS-8 in the City of Edmonds.
REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT: Provide proper zoning for the area upon
its annexation into the City of Edmonds.
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
(Must be submitted at time of application)
1. A drawing or map of the area involved.
2. Environmental Checklist, completed with the $40.00) fee.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The signatures of local residents supporting
t is application may be attached to this form o a separa a page.
FEE: $110.00
',nature of Applicant
As E
A. L
0
SECTION3Q4
1 OWNS
27N.,,RANGE,4Fl?-9,W.IAe,
:$0 2s, 220TH ST
If 0
Ic
z
J
&
6
J
s Sw4N'S
S
w
,4 2
2
S
D DD D
11
12
13
14
15 66
19
�O
3
3
X:x. .......... . .
so
1:
..... ..... ...
. ..... .. ... .
3 2
225PL.
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Between 80th & 76th Area. We&
South of 222nd St.,S.W., andlorth of 225th fl. S.W.
RES, NO, PATE ORD. NOe DATE
: 2 2
NV- 16 OF OFFICIAL. ST. MAP CITY OF EDMONDS
EXHOT-B.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
FILE NO. R-7-83
APPLICANT
Duane V. Bowman being first duly sworn, on oath, deposes
and says:
That on the 3rd day of January 19 84 the attached
Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event,
in the Frances Anderson Center and Civic Center, and where applicable on or near
the subject property.
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
19_�.
a
Notary Public in foe Statof
Washington.
Residing at i
FILE NO. R-7-83
APPLICANT
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
Teresa S. Quigley being first duly sworn, on oath
deposes and says:
That on the 3rd day of January ,19 84 , the attached
Notice of Public Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent property owners,
the names of which were provided by the applicant.
S
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this le-& day of
19
0
Notary Public,/jK and for tiiel�
State of Was ngt n. !
Residing at ,
THE PLANNING BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1984 , ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
FILE NO. R-7-83
CONSIDERATION OF SIMULTANEOUS ZONING ON AN AREA LOCATED IN SNOHOMISH
COUNTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS. THE AREA UNDER RECONSIDERATION
IS GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 222ND ST, S.W., EAST OF 80TH AVE, W. AND
78TH AVE, W „ AND WEST OF 76TH AVE, W. UNDER THE REQUEST, THE AREA WOULD,
�K61YXP(�I�l6i�DCRSI�(GP(�IEDDC UPON ANNEXATION, BE ZONED FROM RR-8400 IN
SNOHOMISH COUNTY TO RS-8 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT 7:30 P .M., IN THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, LIBRARY
BUILDING, 650 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL,
YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS
WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER.
IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR
FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY
AT THE MEETING.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 250 FIFTH AVENUE
NORTH, EDMONDS (PHONE 771-3202, EXTENSION 252).
THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR
LMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE
WARNING ■ OF THEAHEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE
BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT.
THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER JANUARY 11, 1984
,ee►
p
SECTION3t s
TOWNSHkP
27N.,,
$
�oyzs 2 2 0T H ST
Ic .. rT ;
i 1co
a
----,
2 e I
L
w{ w
�..
2
p
! / 1
)
3
1
W
® 4
1:ui.-
HjWN
Z
aT
=
11 12 13 !
14 15 16
1
ti 7
19 .0
'
3
22
A f
Z
1—
t0
ti
� l
•� � _ ; 1 � •off/
1 �
225 PL.X.
' b T {
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Betwoon 80tb A 76th Area. W..
South of 222nd St.,S.W., end -North of 225th PI. S.W.
RES, NO. DATE ORD. N0, DATE
SH NO - OF OFFICIAL ST. MAP CITY OF EDMONDS
y. -
Dolphin Homes
K S. Venture
Box 2208
Lynnwood, WA 98046
Resident
7706 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
John & Elaine Bresnan
7626 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Judith Lane & Gladys Barge
7618 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
James & Kathleen Demiglio
7608 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Pioneer 1st Federal S & L
Acct #02-52002355
4111 200th St. S.W.
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Seafirst Mortgage Corp. Laplante/Resident
Acct #067330-1 7717 224th St. S.W.
4th & Blanchard Bldg 5th F Edmonds, WA 98020
Seattle, WA 98121
R. Nevills/Resident
22230 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Continental Inc.
Acct #060177-L
8th Floor Pacific Bldg
Seattle, WA 98104
Verna Brown/Resident
7629 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Albert & Marie Haley
7705 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Verne & Loretta Mounts
7719 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Arthur P. Commo
22304 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds School District No. 1!
3800 196th St. S.W.
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Arthur H. Riebau
7609 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Alan J. Sitzer
280 H Street Apt. 9
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Continental Inc.
Acct #060434-H
8th Floor Pacific Building
Seattle, WA 98104
Charles Lewis/Resident
Continental Inc.
James Bury/Resident
22212 76th Ave. W.
Acct #47466-H
7618 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
8th Floor Pacific Building
Edmonds, WA 98020
Seattle, WA 98104
Harold D. Deitz
Karl Hubensack/Resident
Old Stone Mortgage
309 170th Pl. S.W.
; 7619 224th St. S.W.
Acct #007590
Bothell, WA 98011
Edmonds, WA 98020
P.O. Box 1517
Walla Walla, WA 99362
Resident
i William C. Ripke
Don Deebach/Resident
22218 76th Ave. W.
7711 224th St. S.W.
7626 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA 98020
Marjie Kelley
Won Jin & Bok Hee Park
Eleanor A. Duncan
7018 150th Pl. S.W.
7703 224th St. S.W.
22419 77th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds, WA 98020
Resident
! Family Savings & Loan
Ruth Bayless
22224 76th Ave. W.
Acct #3-11991
22431 77th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
1100 Aurora Vil. Plaza N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Seattle, WA 98133
Citizens Federal S & L�
Acct #5015110910
320 108th N.E.
Bellevue, WAiNJI
{
4� {
Great Western Savings
Acct #00353100035
11201 S.E. 8th St.
Bellevue, WA 98009 E'
C. Fletcher/Resident
22430 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
E
D. L. Train
22424 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Peoples Mortgage Co.
Acct #9426370
2411 4th Ave./Box 1788
Seattle, WA 98111
Harold Butcher/Resident
22406 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Shoreline Savings
Acct #500-51001353
P.O. Box 25788
Seattle, WA 98125
Ruth Tattersall/Resident
22424 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Columbia Federal S & L
Acct #60-28912
P.O. Box 1609
Wenatchee, WA 98801
William A. Lev
22418 77th West
Edmonds, WA 98020
Betty J. Thompson
9911 226th P1. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Resident
7706 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Lincoln Mutual Savings Bank
Acct #2-1-11984-5
1401 5th Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Lawrence Balke/Resident
7718 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Old Stone Mortgage
Acct #025960
P.O. Box 1517
Walla Walla, WA 99362
Marillen Bouck/Resident
7720 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Royal S. Ostby
7726 224th St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Lomas & Nettleton Co.
Acct #02-46-12333
201 Main St.
Houston, TX 77001
W. Rawlinkiewicz/Resident
22419 78th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Walter Hass
22425 78th W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Old Stone Mortgage
Acct #007646
P.O. Box 1517
Walla Walla, WA 99362
I
Robert Mikels/Resident
22431 78th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Rainier Mortgage Co. Arthur Phillips
Acct -',7-7-050392 762P 022nd St. S.W.
P.O. ,-x C-34040 E.dm s, WA 98020
Seattle, WA 98124
Paul McCorchuk/Resident
7730 222nd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Savings Bank of Puget Sound
Acct #223-34449-8
815 2nd Ave.
Seattle, WA 98104
Terje Eriksen/Resident
7724 222nd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Washington Federal S & L
Acct #50 206 32635-2
1423 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Matthew J. Brown/Resident
7718 222nd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Rainier Mortgage Co.
Acct #146-5-810549
P.O. Box C-34040
Seattle, WA 98124
Robert Gradwohl/Resident
7712 222nd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
General Electric Mtg. Corp.
Acct #0515870
P.O. Box 1420
Portland, OR 97207
Horace Rounds/Resident
7706 222nd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Bankers Life Co.
Acct #2150969
711 High St.
Des Moines, IA 50307
Seafirst Mortgage Copp.
Acct #084496-9
4th & Blanchard Bldg 5th Flr
Seattle, WA 98121
Jay McElroy/Resident
22206 76th Ave. W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Rainier Mortgage Co.
Acct #400-5-168014
P.O. Box C-34040
Seattle, WA 98124
L. Bartlett/Resident
7718 223rd St. S.W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT WEDNESDAY , THE
11TH DAY OF JANUARY , 1984 , HAS BEEN SET AS THE DATE FOR
HEARING BY THE EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD ON CONSIDERATION OF SIMULTANEOUS
ZONING ON AN AREA LOCATED IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF
EDMONDS. THE AREA UNDER CONSIDERATION IS GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
222ND ST. S.W., EAST OF 80TH AVE. W. AND 78TH AVE. W., AND WEST OF
76TH AVE. W. UNDER THIS REUQEST, THE AREA WOULD, UPON ANNEXATION, BE
ZONED FROM RR-8400 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY TO RS-8 IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS.
SAID HEARING WILL BE AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE PLAZA MEETING ROOM, LIBRARY BUILDING,
650 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ARE INVITED
TO ATTEND.
FILE NO.
PUBLISH
R-7-83
12/31/83
IRENE VARNEY MORAN, CMC
EDMONDS CITY .CLERK
FILE R-7-83
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS
to
ZONING ORDINANCE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
DATE 12/29/83
FEE_ N/A RECT # N/A
ENV. ASSESSMENT FEE
ENV. CHECKLIST RECVD (see AX-6-83)
HEARING DATE January 11 , 1984
PROCEDURE: Applications are sent to the
Planning Advisory Board for hearing. The Board will accept, reject, or
revise the proposal contained in the application. This Board action will
be forwarded to the City Council in the form of a Resolution. After the
City Council receives the Resolution from the Planning Advisory Board,
they will set a public hearing date for the final disposition of the
case. The Council may confirm, reject, or modify any decision of the
Planning Advisory Board.
APPLICANT: City of Edmonds
ADDRESS: 250 5th Ave. N. , Edmonds, WA 98020
PHONE: 771- 3202 , ext . 254
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. )=XEUWKBW3IXNXRXMX (Line
out incorrect title). In the case of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
describe the "use" designations to be changed (single-family), multi-
family, commercial, etc.) and the physical areas involved.
Simultaneous zoning for annexation AX-6-83 to zone the annexation area from RR-8400
to RS-8 in the City of Edmonds.
REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT: Provideproper zoning for the area upon
its annexation into the City of Edmonds.
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
(Must be submitted at time of application)
1. A drawing or map of the area involved.
2. Environmental Checklist, completed with the $40.00) fee.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The signatures of local residents supporting
t is application may be attached to this form oul a separa e age.
FEE: $110.00
;nature of Applicant
NIGH SCHOOL Er�i�F
:"As 6
L A Xf,:
,-SECTION3Q,
I OWNSH�P
27U.9,
RAN'GE,4F99 tW,*j I
— — — — — — — — — -- — — — —
---------
-�o 02
220TH ST
c 0
Ic
z
Ui
S W N'S
V2
m
2
221 sy S.W.
D C) D D
12
13
14
Is
16
19
3
X :0:*.:.•
. ...
so
LLI
Ir
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Between 80th & 76th Ares. W.v
South of 222nd St..S.W., andlorth of 225th PI. S.W.
RES, NO, PATE ORD, NO, DATE
SHEQ' N0.13OF OFFICIAL ST. MAP CITY OF EDMONDS
m pa
EDMONDS — The newest
families in Edmonds arrived in
town last Tuesday night.
Their move didn't require a U.
Haul trailer or a realtor's services
-- just a City Council voice vote.
The council voted unanimously
to annex a section of unincor.
porated Snohomish County located
between Edmonds and the town of
Woodway. The area, located bet.
ween 226th Street Southwest and
231st Street Southwest, includes
the Sherwood Elementary School
property.
Mayor Larry Naughten said the
area, which has an assessed value
of $9,658,050, was targeted for an.
nexation when School District 15
approached the city last Year
about a possible annexation of the
school property.
Naughten said the city decided
to make an effort to annex the en.
tire area. "That's why we've been
putting this package together and
why it took so long," he said.
Ray Olson, . an area resident,
noted that recent annexations had
split his political precinct between
the city of Edmonds and unincor.
porated county. "We would like to
have this opportunity to take part
In our own local government,
without having to drive up to
Everett," he said.
Olson said he has been active in
previous attempts to annex the en.
tire unincorporated section of the
county south of the city. He said
the change would improve police
protection and maintain the fine
fire protection his area already
receives from Snohomish County
Fire District 1.
Mike Brancheau, another area
resident, said the annexation was
"very much a pocketbook issue"
to him. He noted that he would
save about $150 yearly on property
taxes, because of higher tax rates
CROSSING GUARD Jon Larsen stops traffic for a pair , of
Sherwood Elementary School students. The school and its
surrounding neighborhood were annexed into the city of
Edmonds last week. (Staff photo by James Bush)
in the unincorporated county area.
Naughten noted that the city's
coffers will be enriched by about
$15,000 in property tax monies
because of the annexation.
The council voted -unanimously
to approve the annexation.
IN OTHER BUSINESS, the
council:
— approved the expansion of a
previously approved 9-lot subdivi-
sion at 15720 68th Avenue West to
12 lots. The modification was
made because of further land ac-
quisitions by the developers.
City Planning Director Mary
Lou Block told the council that the
new plan would move the road ser.
ving the development away from
an environmentally sensitive,
steeply -sloped area on the proper-
ty. The developer had offered to
deed the slope area to the city, but
the council decided instead to pro.
hibit development of the area by
use of a covenant.
— unanimously rejected an ap.
peal of the city's positive en.
vironmental review of an 11-lot
subdivision at 657 9th Avenue
North. The appellant in the matter
had apparently left the council
chambers before the hearing
began and could not be located.
Councilman Bill Kasper, who
owns the construction company
working on the first subdivision
and formerly owned the land used
for the second subdivision, step-
ped down and left the council
chambers during both hearings.
— held a brief discussion of
amending the council's committee
structure and holding the council
retreat at an earlier date than the
scheduled weekend in May.
t_.
car
r;_k