Loading...
PLN200500036 Staff Report.pdfInC.1S9,3 Date: CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning . Building ® Engineering Letter of Transmittal May 27, 2005 To: Lee A. Michaelis 19817 Sunnyside Dr. N., #J-204 Shoreline, WA 98133 Subject: S-05-36 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Transmitting Planning Division Findings, Conclusions, and Decision For Your Information: X As you requested: For your file: Comment: Note attachments: X Cc: Richard A. Crosby Sincerely, Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant Incorporated August 11, 1890 CITY OF S 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 11111 1 - 1j 1 To: File S-05-36 From: Meg well, AICP Senior Planner Date: May 17, 2005 Applicant: Richard A. Crosby Section Page I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 2 A. Application.......................................................................................................................................2 B. Decision............................................................................................................................................ 2 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................3 A. Compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance.................................................................................... 3 B. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan........................................................................................ 5 C. Compliance with the Zoning Code.................................................................................................... 6 D. Compliance with the Flood Plain Management Provisions............................................................... 6 E. Environmental Assessment: .............................................................................................................. 6 F. Critical Areas Review: ...................................................................................................................... 6 G. Comments: ........................................................................................................................................ 6 III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS..........................................................................6 A. Request for Reconsideration............................................................................................................. 6 B. Appeals............................................................................................................................................. 6 C. Time Limits for Reconsideration and Appeals.................................................................................. 7 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL.....................................................................................................7 V. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR..................................................................................7 VI. ATTACHMENTS...............................................................................................................7 VII. PARTIES OF RECORD......................................................................................................7 S-05-36.doc / July 12, 2004/ Staff Report Richard Crosby - File No. S-05-36 Page 2 of 7 INTRODUCTION A. Application 1. Applicant: Richard A. Crosby (see Attachment 2) 2. Site Location: 702 - 9t' Avenue North (see Attachment 1) 3. Request: To divide one lot with a total gross area of approximately 34,593 square feet into two lots in the Single -Family Residential (RS-12) zone (see Attachments 2 and 3.) 4. Review Process: Following the Comment Period, Planning Staff makes an administrative decision. 5. Major Issues: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030, site development standards for the RS-12 zone. b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Title 18, public works requirements. c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.15B, Critical Areas. d. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.75, subdivision requirements. e. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.95, staff review requirements. Note: All code sections referenced in this report can be viewed via the City's website www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. F-00U17-7413 1 1 Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Attachments and Exhibits submitted with the application and during the comment period, the following is the decision of the City of Edmonds Planning Division: The Subdivision is APPROVED with the following conditions: 1. Prior to recording the applicant must complete the following requirements: a) Civil plans must be approved prior to recording. In completing the civil plans you must address the following: (1) Show how you will control off -site drainage entering the site from the southeast corner (which is currently collected in a drainage ditch in the rear lawn of the existing house) and connect that drainage to the city storm sewer system. (2) Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required prior to Recording" on Attachment 4, including payment of fees. b) If setbacks are to be included in the plat, the following must be done: (1) Please correct the setbacks to show: (a) On proposed lot 2, a 25-foot rear setback from the northern edge of the access easement (the south 15 feet); (b) A ten -foot setback around the 25'by 25' access easement S-05-36.doc/ May 27, 2005/ Staff Report Richard Crosby File No. S-05-36 Page 3 of 7 (2) Add to the face of the Plat "Setbacks shown are for reference only and vest no right." c) On the face of the plat, lot area for proposed lots 1 and 2 should show both gross area and the area with all vehicular access easements subtracted (net area). d) Add to the face of the Plat "Conditions of approval must be met and can be found in the final approval for the short subdivision and attachments thereto located in File S-2005-36 in the City of Edmonds Planning Division." e) Include on the plat all required information, including owner's certification, hold harmless agreement, and staff s approval block. f) Provide a maintenance agreement for the 25' by 25' access easement. g) Show all easements on the final plat, as shown on the preliminary plat. h) Make sure all documents to be recorded meet the Snohomish County Auditor's requirements for recording. i) Submit copies of the documents to be recorded for the Planning Division and Engineering Division's approval. Once approved, the applicant must record the documents with Snohomish County Auditor's office. j) Submit an updated copy of the title report (short plat certificate) with the documents proposed to be recorded. k) The name(s) shown on the signature block on the plat must match the names shown on the updated title. 2. After recording the plat, the applicant must complete the following: a) Provide the City Planning Division with two copies of the recorded plat, with the recording number written on them. The City will not consider the subdivision to have been completed until this is done b) Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required with Building Permit" on Attachment 4. 1 11 IMM91131 A. Compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance 1. Environmental Resources a. The environmental resources include trees, most of which have been planted as part of the landscaping. The 14-inch cedar tree labeled as T12 appears to have a split trunk, so even though this is a native tree, it does not need to be preserved. The 18-inch Douglas fir labeled T13 on the plans appears to be in good shape, though it has some discharge of sap along its trunk. The site also appears to have a drain cut across the back yard of the existing house. A neighbor has stated that there is a culvert under the easement road (not shown on the City Storm Sewer System Map) and the water flows downhill onto this site. The ground is quite spongy in spots, and a small channel approximately one - foot wide and one -foot deep has been cut into the lawn to direct the water along the east side of the garage and into the drainage ditch that runs along Carol Way. Although the drainage ditch along Carol Way was moist for the length of the property during staffs April 28, 2005 site visit, downstream of the where the drainage channel from the subject property appears to join in (due north of the middle of the garage) there is running water. The City's Critical Areas Map does not show any stream in the vicinity. Because the ditch in the back yard appears to have been dug for the express purpose keeping the water away from the house and garage, it does not meet the definition of stream given in S-05-36.doc/ May 27, 2005/ Staff Report 2. Richard Crosby - File No. S-05-36 Page 4 of 7 Edmonds Community Development Code Section 23.40.320.MM. It is not exceptionally clear if the spongy area in the rear yard was created by the culvert under the road, or is a natural condition. The wet area is only about 250 square feet in size, with primarily grass growing, with some buttercups and dandelions in it. This area does not appear to meet the definition of a wetland that needs protection, but its function of holding and releasing storm water will need to be addressed. Also, the foundation of the new house should be protected from this drainage. b. The Engineering Division states in their requirements that access for the two lots shall be off Carol Way. The applicants have accommodated this requirement by proposing a shared access easement on the eastern side of proposed lot 1. A sidewalk is also required along Carol Way. It appears that the applicants are accommodating this by replacing the existing drainage ditch with a twelve -inch storm line, backfilling the ditch and placing the sidewalk and driveway over the fill. The house on proposed lot 1 will remain, and the topography will change very little. Proposed lot 2 will be graded slightly for the house and driveway. The lot is fairly level, and the proposed placement of the house on lot 2 is compatible with the existing topography. c. No hazardous conditions exist at this site. d. The proposal includes on -site detention and will connect to the public storm sewer system, which should minimize off -site impacts on drainage. The neighbor to the east has obtained a view easement across the north 45 feet of a portion of the subject property to protect their view, and the proposed placement of the new house respects that easement. The houses to the south sit close to Glen Street or 9t' Avenue N. so their view should not be as impacted as if they were close to their northern property lines. Lot and Street Layout a. This criteria requires staff to find that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the dimensional requirements of the zoning ordinance and also that the lots would ultimately be buildable. Based on a review of the project and the analysis in this section staff agrees that a two -lot short -plat is a reasonable use of the property. b. Lot sizes and dimensions: Required Proposed Proposed Req. Lot Meets Lot Width Lot Area Net sq. ft Gross sq. Width Requirement? ft Lot 1 12,000 18,535 20,878 80' Yes Lot 2 12,000 12,003 13,715 80' Yes C. Setbacks: Setbacks should be as follows: Lot 1 Street Setbacks (25 From the west property line (9t' Avenue N.) and Feet) the north property line (Carol Way) From the south and east property lines and from Side Setbacks (10 Feet) the edges of all easements for vehicular access Lot 2 Street Setback (25 Feet) From north property line (Carol Way) Side Setbacks (10 Feet) From the west and east property lines Rear Setback (25 Feet) From the edge of the easement for vehicular access along the south property line Note: The Engineering Division requires garage doors to be set back 18 feet from an easement, private road, or street property line S-05-36.doc/ May 27, 2005/ Staff Report Richard Crosby File No. S-05-36 Page 5 of 7 d. Corner Lots: Proposed lot 1 is considered to be a corner lot. e. Flag or Interior lot determination: None of the lots are considered to be flag lots. f. Lot Coverage of Existing Buildings on Proposed Lots: 1.) 35% maximum lot coverage is allowed. 2.) The existing house and garage will be retained on proposed lot 1, which will result in a 14.3 percent lot coverage for lot 1. 3.) Lot 2 will have a zero percent lot coverage. 3. Dedications a. See City Engineer's Report (Attachment 4). 4. Improvements a. See City Engineer's Report (Attachment 4). 5. Flood Plain Management a. This project is not in a FEMA designated Flood Plain. B. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan 1. The Comprehensive Plan has the following stated goals and policies for Residential Development. B. Goal. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic and aesthetic considerations, in accordance with the following policies: 13.3. Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. BA. Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. B.5. Protect residential areas from incompatible land. uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: 13.5.a. Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local government. B.5.c. Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traffic or land use encroachments. B.5.d. Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. B.6. Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, vegetation and drainage. S-05-36.doc/ May 27, 2005/ Staff Report Richard Crosby File No. S-05-36 Page 6 of 7 2. Compliance with the Residential Development goals and policies: The proposal will retain the existing housing stock, and also allow for one additional home. The proposed new house will be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology and drainage. Lot 1 will be significantly larger than required, which should enhance privacy. The neighbor has already protected his view through a view easement, and this is being respected by the proposal. In general, the proposed development meets the Comprehensive Plan policies. C. Compliance with the Zoning Code Staff finds this project to comply with the provisions of the Zoning Code as demonstrated in section II.A.2.b. D. Compliance with the Flood Plain Management Provisions The proposed project is not in a Flood Plain. E. Environmental Assessment: Is this site identified on the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map (Shoreline area only)? No. 2. Is an Environmental Checklist Required for this application? No. Critical Areas Review number: CA-2004-120 2. Results of Critical Areas Review: The property does not appear to contain any critical areas as defined by ECDC 20.15B. As a result, a waiver from the requirement to complete a study was issued. G. Comments: No comments have been received. The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsiderations and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. '•�' r 1111111111111 1' 111 ii Section 20.100.010.G allows for City staff to reconsider their decision if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the posting of the notice required by this section. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. Section 20.105.040 and 20.105.020 describes how appeals of a staff decision shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the S-05-36.doe/ May 27, 2005/ Staff Report Richard Crosby File No. S-05-36 Page 7 of 7 decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision being appealed. C. Time Limits for Reconsideration and Appeals The time limits for Reconsiderations and Appeals run concurrently. If a request for a reconsideration is filed before the time limit for filing an appeal has expired, the time "clock" for filing an appeal is stopped until a decision on the reconsideration request is completed. Once the staff has issued his/her decision on the reconsideration request, the time clock for filing an appeal continued from the point it was stopped. For example, if a request is filed on day 5 of the appeal period, an individual would have 9 more days in which to file an appeal after the staff issues their decision on the reconsideration request. Section 20.075.100 states, "Approval of a preliminary plat or preliminary short plat shall expire and have no further validity at the end of five years, unless the applicant has acquired final plat or final short plat approval within the five-year period." The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the staff request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office. V 1. Vicinity / Zoning Map 2. Application 3. Plat Map 4. Engineering Requirements Lee A. Michaelis Richard A. Crosby Planning Division 19817 Sunnyside Dr. N., 0-204 3924 — 204' St. SW, #116 Shoreline, WA 98133 Lynnwood, WA 98037 Engineering Division 5-05-36.doc/ May 27, 2005/ Staff Report city of • i i' 'a • use application — 'uyfka 4 4: f{ J 0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW Wous 09• 0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # ro5' 3 ZONE g' 0 HOME OCCUPATION. DATE " ®� REC'D BYi 0 FORMAL SUBDIVISION RECEIPT# 0?5 SHORT SUBDIVISION G2 5-0 r?�' 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 66 © _ C�0 HEARING DATE 0 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPME19 1 ca a 0 HE 0 STAFF 0 PB 0 ADB 0 CC 0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AM,- 0 STREET VACATION �- 0 REZONE 0 SHORELINE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION 0 OTHER: PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 702- ! 1 Au6 Iv . I' PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) A \/ [; �✓ ko 2'C ���T Ca �Flz EE POAA S PROP ERTYOWNER 9tCkAi2D A. C osgY PHONE# Y25-�7Co- I't 42- ADDREss SRZL-I Zoy ST Sy4 Illa L-< Nnlwoyi� �W g8(737 E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # y2 S o 7 71. TAX ACCOUNT # Da 5`tg 9 000 007 0l SEC. Z -1 TWP. Z 7 RNG. 6 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED USE //o i z, 7 V ;, L-�S 2oiVk�® )25-12— APPLICANT SAAALL A5 J2Z1Pt:R7_'f PHONE # ADDRESS E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # CONTACT PERSON/AGENT GE!< A. AA1 c f A EL t 5 PHONE # Z o&- 6ef 91. 02- k _7 (e ADDRESS031Z 5vNNY5iAC D2• /1,1 #eTZoy SHdfLELINCsy�/fl �8l Zip E-MAIL ADDRESSLEE.MlcgAg't (5,/ l--UGETsoy/yf>PG.41[1v/NG, coM FAX # 3( 9 r7 The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listedbelow. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE 3 (%%212Cos Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes i pec a posti ttendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE This application form was revised on 1/27/00. To verify whether it is still current, call (425) 771-0220. L:\LIBRARY\PLANNING\Fo=s & HandoutsTublic Handouts\Land Use Application.doc ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 3 FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT g'V q3 RECEIVED - BRASS DISK ON SURFACE �Qv ;'E_R SIT COUNTER ® --- CURB CUT p $ �p6 CURB CUT ��0 CURB CUT 17 CONC. vERT Lx1Re ® GRAPHIC SCALE 1" =20' 20 0 20 CAROL iYAY - BENCHMARK 39N3 428-N - 11 TOP CENTER BOLT ON F.H. o y ® EL- 305.38 U.S. FEET. N N ® / ti BASIS OF BEARINGS: (ASSUMED) ASPIWLT EDGE s/ pO BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENIERUNE lg N OF 9TH AVENUE NORTH BEING NORTH 0(712'00' WEST AS O N.W. COR., 11 __> ry RECORDS OF IN S. 112, - ` 30 304 -- f � �1O ® VO�UMEWN �B OF PLATS,N THE PLAT AT PAGE 83,F SHARON REST, RECORDED 15 • ' s 308 COUNTY. ASHINGTON LOi7 - ---- --- ---------- -� SNOHOMISH N W 2350523 202.&1 I 17 43.82' 59.02 NOTES. LAST VISITED ON I T-17-04. - r / \ REFERENCE SURVEYS: 30' , i;:,:. - -- -- �� zs• x zs,tccEss ' EASEMENT v , EASEMENT SC: PLAT Of SHARON CREST, VOLUME 18, PAGE J. %6 RECORDING NO. 895867 n ROS: (REC. NO. 9408125002) VOLUME 43, PAGE 110. ' ® r____------- --- -- VERTICAL DATUM. N ___ " - - ---- I 51• t '� � - -- -tt ASSUMED. BENCHMARK: TOP CENTER BOLT ON FIRE HYDRANT ELEVATION = 305.38 U.S. FEET (ASSUMED). i I CONTOUR INTERVAL: GARAGE `-I -------------------- ---- 2.00 U.S. FEET. o _ / rD.a'• SITE ADDRESS: 702 9TH AVE. N. EDMONDS• WA. 98020 � / - � ` -p ZONING: ^ I m ^ 31 t / LOT 1 WOW DECK I T6 `O \ RS-12 ug I , 31`L 20,878t 50� ,� IT9 �, �• T2 ,. lv� N a T< ER LEIGH BE NE LEGEND: I „ �? a'. OWNER: CAROL W BENNET ' D ' ij4`- y� tm ', uiX 930 CAROL WAY ® FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 308 --!/ i ��� 73 w L.' `?k:'... " �' £DMONOS, WA 98020 - n Z 0 ---j 316 TL M07 0 ?:..s:C 9) �t W� 1� I ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE v c4 94,593>; S0. F7: =" '�' t 7'r g i t W000 DECK $ .:°:.C, I:.. T10 OD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE w i } - i -------LOT 2"3' ® CATCH BASIN 0 0 i ' 318� ' "-:7 ' I 13.715t 50. FT. t cn I ` ; f10USE - _ ' / @ CULVERT 3,. Q F.F.= 3215t 6. FIRE HYDRANT I I ® 10.00 • "�'. - `' / I 37 / / �- t 6 328 ® WATER VALVE ® t 0 I N87ff.50 I' / t ® WATER METER III t / 324- GAS METER / - � = • t t UTILIN POLE T3---Tll�-- 330 � $ N ML 858E 'pry ' t t ® UCHT POLE � 1 - VAULT 1 - . 32 ,E4SEMEi'!t M TELEPHONE RISER ASPHALT _ IiVEG RECORDING NO 221918& v `� / I - r 4 I ° .,•:• _-- __ __ < �-\ ,`_�„a:-- - 11" ® CABLE N RISER in 15' EASEMENT RECORDING NOS GUY ANCHOR v /886253, 1101798, 950227050 , S� _ 1 1 - •= - <- -- .� 114.41 • 882997 S. LINE LOT 7 ' TREE LEGEND: 11s.fs' .1 W OR. ASPHALT EDGE /�9 34 28'W 229.60CONIFEROUS TREE 3�6 LOT 7-!' END OF FENCE LS 1.31 FENCE is 0.2Y \ DECIDUOUS TREE S. OF PROP. t N. OF PROP. COR. •: �, { Ti: 2/19' CHERRIES T2: 2/13" BIRCHES ,b 0T3: 12" BIRCH - ASP♦wCT EDGE �nP q k TL 1005M900000807 T4; 10' CHERRY ,,��p�QPO AKS OWNER. �� S T6: 3%16- 18' CHERRIES TL 10054890MOO801 `'m `"�� u� "�9 ��' EDMONDS, WA 98020 T7: 24` BIRCH I OWNER: WIRGINA DEAVER o `�', p�Qp Jt•` MNL P.O. BOX 1236 T8: 14" BIRCH 612 9TH AVE. N. Q'70��0� EDATONOS, WA 98020 T9: 14" BIRCH EDMONOS, WA 98020 TiO: 18' CHERRY Aj 3 1 TI1: 7' FRUIT INSTRUMENT USED: 600 1`12: 14' CEDAR ® DRAINAGE STRUCTURE: T13: f8` FIR METNGD:iRAVERSE EXCEEDING REQUIREMENTS OF WAG. 332-130-090. T14: 4/9' OAKS 11: SSMH RI = J3 17.'RIM C8 INDEXING DATA: S.W. 1/4, N.E. 1/4, SEC. 24, L 27 NORTH, R. 3 EAST, W.M. RIM = 300.93 RIM = 337.54 RIM = 300.21 8' RCP S= 293.88 12 RCP E.- 333.24 r RCP S- 297.89 Cramer 1 g C (TY O F E D M O N D S ` 14 8' RCP E . 293.88 8' RCP W.= 33334 �T®r�„T,p®Ly� Inc.��.•H A� it RCP N.= 93.888 18: CB Northwest lb'® \s A7 ••••1••• �:�• 15: SOMH RIM = it 1.o9 0: a SHORT SUBDIVISION FOR 12. - 31A14 R9.1 = P S- lr RCP S.W.= 309.41 Surveyors Planners & Engineers :k d• rnM = 310.47 1r RCP s.= 296.17 Y 9 CAREFREE HOMES E TA 8' RCP E.= 30307 12' RCP N.= 295.77 19: CB - 3924 204TH ST. S.W. SUITE 116 LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98155 6' RCP W.= 302.97 It RCP E= 295.97 RIM = 31B06 945 N. CENTRAL, STE, #104, KENT, WA 98032 :a 8' RCP SE= 296.37 8" PVC E= 316,01 - ° DRAWN BY: DATE: JOB NO.: lr RCP W= 315.96 13, SWH (253)852-4880 (local) FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT RN = 336.49 16: CB 1-(800)251-0189 (toll free) s'•ge40016,jp T.E.C. Wed., Apr. 20, 2005 2004-221 W (CTR OF SK ISEC.) CASE 12' RCP E= 32Z09 RIM = S.W- 111: IE i7 � - 30100.45 (253)852-4955 (fax) �. ....•..... . CHECKED BY: SCALE: SHEET: 12' RCP S= 327..09 R' RCP S.W.= 300.37 E-MAIL: cni@cramernw.com DWMM 071W O-R-H- 1 1nrh = 90 FT 9 nF 9 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR: (CITY OF EDMONDS FiLE NUMBER J 702 9TH AVE. NORTH EDMONDS, WA REMOVE IXCURB CUT & REPLACE W/CONC CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK 0 L---1 �- � � 0 EKTENDEXSTORMLINE®SAME F6`'�60} 60LFOFIS-OM MMM GRAMM&Al1Cd/A1FM W/ G p PERCOESIDDETAILIM1.1 MATCHING FME MATERW. 0p &E5.1W/11JTTPEICB1 /) A DETEPET1aN p�E RENOENWORiVEWAY APFROxLOCATNNI SYSTEM' ENTRANCE PERCOE STD OF ER WATER MAW �\ o OUTFALL DETAB.E216, W+4d p6 pe (SEE IMPERVIOUS 6 0 �' T----- ttw9 'Cr} CU�C6i } SIIRFACFSIMMARY(-_i; Nr rnx 1� c ® 7 reA WA / -w ROL WAY A--YIA-! WA / WA- / W� 7WA. t- _ N69'34'18"W /1 + 1 / --�- SS-Sf SS -SS ( S / SS / TYPEI[H - / _ --2.350523 NEWSRIESEWER lcecs5� EN CONNECTION, TO EK TRAIN � ! rap cENTER 8oLr rEEr.-4-. -t- f (a55uuED) I ftELV WATER ME7ER&SERVICE J REMOVE EKCURB / `.� 1 / 8 / I I COtRNFCi10tL7O EXMAW 7!I J &GRAVEL DRIVEWAY i�} m'I NEHIPfdf "s 1 w11CCESS EsMrFo Lor: t NEW NORFGU REMOVEO@LPQS "310� I / w000 DECK /' /6 b T I <� n" WC` .- 1 tj 1 / } watt TfCN 34.5931 SO ET. o l 2 (NYNatll Si'R \I ''� o I LOT ,318'FF,r'C.<Y�v`YA ( . / = 32351 114 F _ / WfMO f y +l ',TREES 4-0 VNE FOOTING ING DM j�Un1 1 1 Ao \r121 // pit// I `3\ I I ryh Y IS' FASDRNr ArcoR 'G w-'s / - - - -- _ - - - - .866151 1101 J98. 9501170.W5, 88199J7 _ - Jl1 aSHW"r EIXC / N89'36'Zd"W 129. (i0'! -�I - --1 D_hYE 15 1.3E l 1 EOX'E is 0.1't \ � I ! (ASPt6di EA'E \ G P 1'- 20' CALL BEFORE YOU DiG 1-800-424-5555 Q9 FOIUNDMONTUMENTASDESCRWEED ® SAWARY SEWER MANHOLE Q STORM DRAW MANHOLE DO CATCH BASIN OO CULVERT 6- FIRE HYDRANT 'e WATER VALVE ® WATERMETER m GAS METER UTILITY POLE ® UGHTPOLE O VAULT ® TELEPHONE RISER ® CABLETVRISER L GUYANOIOR TREEINFO CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE Tl: i9'CHERRIES T2: 13'81RCHE5 T3: 1 B R(H T4: 10' CHERRY T5: II//16'OAKS T6: Kj1Or FBICHERRIES T/: 14-BIRCH TR: 14'BIRCH T9: IERH rCH TIC: BY' TrFRUIT TM HERM ICCED R 8*FIR T13: 41TO T14: 4/9' OAKS DRAINAGE & SEWER INFO ol!sm P4:SDMH n:CO RIM-300.93 RIM-33154 r4M-30021 WRCPS-293R8 8'RERE-293,88 I2'RCPE-33314 8'RCPW-33334 B'Ra&-297.89 irRCPK-29178 ft CB fE SSMW 15'.SDMH RIM-301D7 RIM-3I1.09 12'RCPSW-309.41 RIM - 310.41 12' RCP 1= 296.17 8'RCP E-303D7 I2'RCPK-295.77 it..a 8'RCP W.-30L91 2'RCP E-295M RIMS-31806 43: SSMH 8'RCPSE-296.37 8'WCE-316AI it' RCP W-315.96 RDA-336.49 46: Ce IYRCPE-321.09 12'RCPS-32&99 RIM-303.02 8`RCPSW=30037 1I0:IE11'1CP-314.76 It tw Ir RU 300.45 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE SUMMARY REMOVWPGIS 119963E NEwm 1438 SF NEWNONPGU 1600SF NEFNEWIMPETMWSSURFACE 2,9655E GRADING QUANTITY APPROXIMATE OUT: 266CY FELL: 77 CY NET ICUII: 190CY EX GRADE 2'MWASPHALTPAVFMFM 23/8'CSTC 4-1/4- CSOC APPROVED 3UBGRADE O STREET SECTION (CAROL WAY) 6 S 1' = 1' m, Brookmere Or Casper St a 524 ViewmoOr Pl V�t V14 PI Mount ain Ln Gas Cascade O 702 91h Ave N Way Abha St m Glen S a m z Daley a Sprague Stt _-._- VICINITY MAP NTS \ 1 ( J OWNER CARETBEEHOMES 3924204TH ST.SW 8116 LYNNWOOD, WA98036 425.77&1442 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 PER CHIGW O TITU COMPANY OROFR N0. 52160131 THATPORTIONOFTHESOUTHL A FOFLOTT PUGETSOUNDMACHINERYDEPOT FIVE ACRE TRAMACCORDWG TO THEPLATTHEREOF, RECORDEO W VOLUMES OF PLATS, PAGE47, RECORDS OFSNOHOMRSH COUNTY, WASMNGTOµ DUMBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7 FOR 223A0 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTCORNEROFATRACTCONVEYEDTO RLEMMETKUEKMETSON. DATED ET UK BY DEED AM 17, MEL RECORDED UNMAUDIFORS FILE NO. 886253; THENCE SOUTH 9'58'EASTALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAIDKLEMMEISON TRACT,167.90 FEE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 2SOA0 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORM ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 7FOR 16500 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGWNWG. EXCEPT THE WEST 2140 FEET CONDEMNED BY THE CLTYOFEDMONDSFOR STREEF PURPOSES W SNOHOMISHCOUNTY SUPERKRLCOURTCAM NO.1046n AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 5.00 FEET CONVEYEDTOTHE CITY OFEDMONDS FOR STREET PURPOSES UNDER AUDITORS FILE NO.2350523. SITUATE WTHE COUNf OFSNOHOMLISµ STATE OFWASHINGTON, BASIS OF BEARING BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF9THAVENUE NORTH OEWG NORM 00'IY00' WESTAS SHOWN ON THEPIATOF SHARON CREST, RECORDED W VOLUME 180E PLATSATPAGE 83,RECORDS OF SNOHOM{MCOUNIY, WASMNGTON. BENCHMARK TOP CENTER BOLT ON FIRE HYDRANT ELEVATION -30S38 U1 FEET (ASSUMEOI. VERTICAL DATUM ASSUMED. TAX ACCOUNT NO 00549400000701 27.50' 5.00' CONIC 7.00'TO CONCCURB -� F SIDEWALK � ROWIR DESIG7{MWN/CHECKIV JSH 0 � C a v m o t: �c ®4 E Z o � N r W 0 U a CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR SHORT PLATS Name: CROSBYY� File No.: S-05-36 Approved by: GCS O a r— Vicinity: 702 9`h AVE N Engineering Program Manager date Req'd Req'd w/bldg. Bond posted Complete prior to Permit recording 1. Rights -of -way for public streets: N/A X 2. Easements (City utilities, private access, other utilities): Provide all easements as needed. X 3. Street improvements (ACP with curb and gutter): Slope of proposed private driveways shall not exceed 12%. X Access for the above lots shall be off Carol Way X Construct 18" concrete curb and gutter along the property X frontage on Carol Way. Creation of on street parking on Carol Way will require a X minimum road width of 31.5' from face of curb to face of curb 4. Street turnaround: N/A. X 5. Sidewalks and/or walkways:. Construct 5' wide concrete sidewalk along property frontage on X Carol Way. Install new curb ramp at 9`h Ave N and Carol Way X 6. Street lights: N/A X 7. Planting strip: N/A X 8. Water system improvements (pipelines, fire hydrants, etc) Provide service to each lot. X Connect to public waters stem. X 9. Sanitary sewer system improvements (pipelines, pump stations etc) Provide new service to each lot X Connect to public sewer system X 10. Storm sewer system improvements (pipelines, DOE, fisheries, etc.): Provide storm sewer service to all proposed lots. X Construct storm detention system sized to provide adequate X capacity for proposed single family dwellings and access improvements in accordance with ECDC 18.30. Connect to Public Storms stem X 11. On -site drainage (plan per Ord. 3013): Connect all new jp2pervious surfaces to detentions stem. X 12. Underground wiring (per Ord. 1387): Required for all new services X 13. Excavation and grading (per UBC, Chapter 70 : Submit a grading plan as part of engineered site plan. X ATTACHMENT 4 V:\dvnv\.sp\05-36 crosby plt.doc Req'd prior to Req'd w/bldg. Bond Complete recording Permit posted 14. Signage (per City Engineer): N/A X 15. Survey monumentation (per Ord., Section 12.10.120): N/A X 16. As -built drawings (per City Engineer): Required for all utility construction. X 17. Other requirements: a) Plat showing lots, easements, legals, survey information X X b) Legal documents for each lot X c) Field stake lot corners (by professional engineer) X d) Clustered mailbox location per Postmaster X e Maintenance agreements X 18. Engineering fees: a) Storm drainage connection charge for plat road ( N/A ) b) Storm drainage connection charge per lot ($ 428. ) X c) Sewer connection fee per SFR ($ 730.) X d) Sewer connection charge/LID fees to be paid in full. X e) Water connection fee per SFR (based on meter size) X d) Plat inspection fee: 2.2% of improvement costs ($ ) X e) Plan review fee: ($ 860.) X 0 Traffic mitigation: ($ 840.72) X Z1 dyJ® ENGINEERING PROGRAM MANAGER, CITY OF EDMONDS DATE The -Engineering requirements have;been completed and the subdivision can be recorded. Authorized for recording by: Date: V:\dvnv\sp\05-36 crosby plt.doc