2020-09-08 City Council - Full S Agenda-2661o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
V,j Hv COUNCIL COMMITTEES - SPECIAL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE,
HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA
98020
SEPTEMBER 8, 2020, 7:00 PM
CITIZENS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE AUDIENCE COMMENT PORTION OF THE
MEETING MAY CONNECT VIA ZOOM AT ANY POINT BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE AUDIENCE
COMMENT PERIOD. CITIZENS WILL SIT IN A VIRTUAL WAITING ROOM UNTIL THEIR TURN TO
SPEAK. WHEN THE CITIZEN ENTERS THE LIVE COUNCIL MEETING, THEIR TIME WILL BEGIN. THE
CLERK WILL BE THE TIME KEEPER AND PROVIDE A 30-SECOND WARNING AND A FINAL WARNING
WHEN THEIR TIME IS UP. THE CITIZEN WILL BE REMOVED AND THE NEXT SPEAKER WILL BE
ALLOWED IN.
CITIZENS MAY CONNECT WITH A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE AT:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/S/4257752525
OR JOIN THE MEETING BY PHONE AT:
888 475 4499 (TOLL FREE) OR 877 853 5257 (TOLL FREE) MEETING ID 425 775 2525
CITIZENS NOT WISHING TO PARTICIPATE IN AUDIENCE COMMENTS MAY CONTINUE TO MONITOR
THE LIVESTREAM ON THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, CABLE TV, OR TELEPHONE BY
CALLING (712) 775-7270, ACCESS CODE 583224.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/S/4257752525)
6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
Edmonds City Council Agenda
September 8, 2020
Page 1
1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 1, 2020
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1. Countywide Buildable Lands Program (20 min)
2. Vision 2050 Update (15 min)
3. Presentation of Preliminary Findings for the Ballinger Regional Facility Feasibility Study (45 min)
4. July 2020 Monthly Financial Report (10 min)
5. Amendment of Edmonds Cares Fund Ordinance (20 min)
8. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
9. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
September 8, 2020
Page 2
6.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/8/2020
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of September 1, 2020
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
09-01-2020 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 3
6.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
September 1, 2020
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Mayor Pro Tem
Susan Paine, Council President Pro Tem
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Cultural Serv. Dir.
Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Mgr.
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr.
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem
Fraley-Monillas. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Olson read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the
original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We
respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection
with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, with the exception of Mayor
Nelson, participating remotely.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE MOVED. SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L.
JOHNSON, TO AMEND TO ADD A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO THE AGENDA
FROM LAST WEEK'S MEETING ON THE TOPIC OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE FORMATION,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 1
Packet Pg. 4
THAT THE SUBCOMMITTEE BE FORMED BY THE COUNCIL RATHER THAN THE
COUNCIL PRESIDENT.
City Attorney Jeff Taraday pointed out while it was fine to add this to the agenda, it shouldn't be called a
motion for reconsideration; motions for reconsideration are only styled as such when they happen at the
same meeting. Council President Pro Tern Paine commented it could be done at the next meeting; this
was the first possible meeting since the last meeting. Mr. Taraday relayed his understanding and the way
the Council has always done it was it considered a motion for reconsideration if it occurred at the same
meeting, otherwise it was to renew an issue.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas asked City Clerk Scott Passey for input. Mr. Passey said it was a matter
of semantics whether it was called reconsideration or a new motion.
Council President Pro Tern Paine preferred it be a motion for reconsideration.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS,
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L.
JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND
OLSON VOTING NO.
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas' inquiry, Council President Pro Tern Paine requested it be
added to agenda after the public hearing, as Action Item 9.1 or 9.3. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas
suggested Item 9.3.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. PRESENTATIONS
1. PROCLAMATION ON SUICIDE PREVENTION MONTH
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas read a proclamation proclaiming the month of September 2020 as
Suicide Prevention Month in the City of Edmonds.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas asked for a moment of silence for those lost to suicide, survivors and
loved ones of those who have died by suicide.
2. SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT SUICIDE PREVENTION REPORT
Wendy Burchill, Healthy Communities Specialist, Snohomish Health District, explained her focus
has been on injury prevention and most of her time in the past two years has focused on suicide
prevention. She coordinates the Snohomish County child death review which includes data regarding
youth suicide. She thanked the City of Edmonds for taking the initiative to recognize suicide prevention
and making it a priority in the community. Suicide has affected nearly everyone in one way or another.
Ms. Burchill reviewed:
Video about suicide (https://youtu.be/xZbdfZpzhgM)
Suicide in our community
o Graph — Suicide Trend by Age Group, Snohomish County, 2013-2018 (Rate per 100,000)
o Rates have remained consistent except for ages 15-24
o In Snohomish County, suicide is the #2 cause of death for 15-24 year olds which is consistent
with the state and the nation
■ Age 15-24
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 2
Packet Pg. 5
6.1.a
- 2013: 6.5
- 2014: 21.6
- 2015: 23.9
- 2016: 18.5
- 2017: 21.9
- 2018: 27.4
In death reviews, began seeing middle school youth dying by suicide about 5 years ago
In Snohomish County, suicide is the #1 cause of death in ages 10-17
Age 1-14
- 2013: 0
- 2014: 1.5
- 2015: 2.95
- 2016: 0
- 2017: 0.71
- 2018: 1.4
o Youth suicides (0-18), Snohomish County 204-2019 (ending June 2019 School years)
■ Male:24
■ Female:11
o July 2019-July 2020
■ Zero youth suicides
Suicide in Snohomish County
o Over a ten-year period (2006-2016):
■ 8th graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has increased by nearly 50%
(8.8% to 13.7%)
■ loth graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has also increased nearly 50%
(12.2% to 17.5%)
■ 12th graders who planned how they would attempt suicide has also nearly doubled (9.1%
to 17.5%)
■ 12th graders who have seriously considered attempting suicide has nearly doubled (11.7%
to 22.7%)
What We Know
o Suicide is complex. There are almost always multiple causes, including mental illnesses, that
may not have been recognized or treated. Death by suicide is rarely caused by a single event,
such as a recent job loss, divorce, bullying, or bad grades. Mental disorders and/or substance
abuse have been found in 90 percent of people who have died by suicide.
o Personal stories from those who overcame a suicidal crisis or a suicide attempt are affective
and impactful ways to offer hope. Hope in any form can help someone overcome a suicidal
crisis.
o When it comes to individuals who struggle with suicidal thoughts, suicide is not the problem,
it's the solution to a perceived unsolvable problem. This is why appropriate treatment
interventions are so important.
o Asking someone directly about suicidal intent lowers anxiety, opens up communication and
lowers the risk of an impulsive act.
Why Talk About Suicide?
o Discussing suicide (in person or in the media) carefully and appropriately, can
■ Change public misperceptions
■ Correct myths
■ Reduce stigma
■ Encourage those who are vulnerable or at risk to seek help.
4PREVENT future suicides
• How to Help
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 3
Packet Pg. 6
6.1.a
o Take and/or offer trainings like Mental Health First Aid or QPR
o Partner with area mental health providers and crisis resources to keep the conversation about
suicide in the forefront
o Utilize social media platforms to accurately relay hopeful survivor stories and resources
o Be the source for timely and accurate data about suicide in your community
o Provide crisis line information and mental health resources to clients, community members
and/or students via flyers, posters, cards, and on student IDs
Crisis Resources in Snohomish County
0 24/7 consultation with professional staff
o Online chat function (www.Imhurting.org)
o Urgent appointments
0 800-584-3578
0 425-258-4357
• Suicide Resources
o American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
www.afsp.org
o National Association of School Psychologists
www.nasponline.org
o Suicide Prevention Resource Center
www.sprc.org
o The Trevor Project
www.thetrevorproject.org
o Mental Health First Aid
www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org
New Resources
o YIRT
■ Volunteers of America Western Washington's Behavioral Health Services, in
coordination with Snohomish County Human Services, is pleased to announce the Youth
Incident Response Team (YIRT). YIRT is a specialty program that will provide free,
short-term crisis intervention and prevention services to families, schools and
communities which have experienced a significant community -based trauma involving or
impacting youth. The team consists of mental health professionals with specialized
training in trauma -informed care and disaster response. They will utilize strength based,
solution -focused, culturally competent trauma informed approaches.
■ This service is available throughout Snohomish County during regular business hours:
Monday through Friday, 8am-5pm to individuals and groups.
■ To access these services, contact the 24/7 Care Crisis Line at 1-800 584-3578 or email
Pat Morris, YIRT Project manager at pmorris@voaww.org
o Community COVID Outreach Counselors Program
■ The Community COVID Outreach Counselors Program can provide emotional support
services to residents of Snohomish County whose mental health has been impacted by
COVID-19. Snohomish County residents living through the COVID pandemic will
experience varying degrees of anxiety, trauma, stress and depression. Community
COVID Outreach Counselors will provide short-term interventions designed to provide
emotional support and to connect residents with needed services and resources.
Community COVID Outreach Counselors will receive direct referrals as well as referrals
from 211, family members, friends, co-workers, teachers, neighbors and others concerned
about how individuals are coping with COVID induced changes. The Counselors will
provide short-term interventions that help citizens understand their current situation and
reactions. To access the service, residents in need may call 2-1-1.
o WA Listens
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 4
Packet Pg. 7
6.1.a
■ A new program that provides nonclinical support to people experiencing elevated stress
due to COVID-19.
■ Call 1-833-681-0211 to be connected to a live support specialist. The support specialist
will listen and connect you to community resources in your area. The program is
anonymous and no identifying information is maintained.
■ www.walistens.org
o How Right Now
■ "How Right Now" is an initiative to address people's feelings of grief, loss and worry
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, it aims to increase people's ability to adapt and
be resilient during this time. The How Right Now initiative is funded by the CDC
Foundation.
■ www.howrightnow.org
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed this was a difficult topic to talk about, especially for people her age,
men in particular, it is very difficult for a man to admit to another man that he is depressed and ignoring
that call for help can be deadly. This is an important topic for youth as well as middle aged especially
during COVID. Someone who is clinically depressed and has a chemical imbalance cannot get out of it
without antidepressants. She asked if the reason there had not been many youth suicides during COVID
was because parents were at home. Ms. Burchill said it warrants conversation. She was also curious why,
she has her own personal ideas/thoughts; that may be one of the reasons, but youth often say their safe
place is not their home. She relayed one of her children struggles with mental health issues and he has
been a completely different young man since he has been home and out of the school environment,
happier and more engaged. There is some validity to being home with family, not having the daily
pressure of in -person school, the schedule, bullying, etc. in the school environment, as well as sleep. She
also wants to look at attempts, maybe attempts have increased, but no young people were lost. She knew
from talking with kids that they are stressed, but the stress is different.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Ms. Burchill and Councilmember Distelhorst for his work on this,
bringing attention to this extremely important issue especially during COVID. She relayed in March when
things first started, her 14-year old son experienced a tremendous reduction in anxiety due to release of
pressures, both social and possibly over -scheduling, although his stress has increased due to his lack of
social interaction. Education and recognition goes a long way toward destigmatizing mental health. As a
mom of three teens, she pays particularly attention to adolescent mental health. Another preventative
action is following lock -it -up or safe storage programs for firearms and prescription drugs which are the
two most lethal methods for suicide. Firearms account for 50% of death by suicide and prescription drugs
19%. She asked why that was not part of the presentation.
Ms. Burchill said her prevention efforts in the community include participation in the lock -it -up program
where she gives away gun locks specifically around the topic of suicide prevention. Because it
immediately becomes political or a hot topic, at times she has been told not to come for that reason. She
agreed safe storage and reducing access to means can significantly reduce firearm suicide. Most attempts
are done in moments of panic or despair and once those acute feelings are at ease, 90% of people do not
go on to die by suicide. People often think if someone doesn't use a firearm, they will use another method
which is not true. Safe storage of firearms is very important in the suicide prevention world.
Councilmember L. Johnson recalled 90% of attempted suicide by firearm ends in death. Ms. Burchill said
in the United States, 86% of attempted suicide by firearm ends in death. In homes without firearms, it is
only 6%. Anecdotally from reviewing youth suicides in the community for 20 years, she believed if
firearms were properly stored in the home, half of the youth suicides would not occur. She clarified she
not against gun ownership. Adult suicide is different because they have different access means and issues.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 5
Packet Pg. 8
6.1.a
Council President Pro Tern Paine thanked Councilmember Distelhorst and Ms. Burchill for addressing
this serious issue. It is not unusual to have people in one's family circle struggle with this and it is
important to recognize. She learned at a funeral recently that sometimes mental health is just as deadly as
cancer or any other disease. People need to pay attention and treat it that seriously.
Councilmember Distelhorst gave his heartfelt thanks to all the partners: Ms. Burchill and the Snohomish
Health District; Lisa Edwards and the Verdant Health Commission; Daniel Johnson and Michelle Reitan
and the Edmonds Waterfront Center; Maureen Judge, Cindi Cruz, and Patrick Doherty on City staff; and
Brook Roberts and other members of the Edmonds Youth Commission. It has been a fantastic group to
work with and he was proud of the two free, virtual events planned for this month: Question, Persuade
Refer suicide prevention training on September 17', and a community panel for all ages on September
23'. Details regarding the events are on new City webpage, WeCare.edmondswa.gov. There will also be
posters and banners in the City. The proclamation read tonight is also available in Spanish, simplified
Chinese, Korean, and Russian. He summarized we cannot treat our mental health and wellbeing or suicide
as taboo. We need to be able to learn, talk and support our friends, family and community members.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas expressed appreciation for Councilmember Distelhorst's work on this
topic. Having had a family member who was successful in committing suicide, she appreciated everything
he has done to allow the citizens of Edmonds to participate in training.
3. TREE BOARD REPORT
Frank Caruso, Tree Board Co -Chair reviewed:
• 2019
Members
o
Bill Phipps, Co -Chair
o
Vivian Olson, Co -Chair***
o
Frank Caruso, Vice Chair
o
Steve Hatzenbeler* * *
o
Barbara Chase
o
Doug Petersen
o
Gail Lovell
o
Suzanne Juergensen (Alternate)
o
Leslie Smith (Student Representative)
o
Diane Buckshnis (City Council Liaison)
• 2020 Members
o
Frank Caruso, Co -Chair
o
Barbara Chase, Co -Chair
o
Bill Phipps
o
Doug Petersen
o
Gail Lovell
o Suzanne Juergensen
o Donna Murphy***
o Ross Dimmick (Alternate)***
o Diane Buckshnis (City Council Liaison)
Tree Board's Main Mission
o The City of Edmonds Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting and
maintaining of trees for the long term benefit to our community
Year in Review - 2019
o Edmonds is now in its 10 ' year as a Tree City USA
o Our 4th Growth Award (meaning we worked hard!)
o Earth Day — City Park Ivy pull: partnered with City Parks Department
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 6
Packet Pg. 9
6.1.a
o Trees in downtown Edmonds identified with temporary name tags
o Partnered with Edmonds in Bloom on their Garden Tour — 3rd time trees identified
o Improved and expanded on the Tree Board website
o Completed a final draft of Trees for Small Spaces brochure
o Arbor Day Planting Celebration at the greenway by Yost Park and Main Street
o Saturday Market Info Booth and Tree Raffle
o Participated with the City on the formulation of an Urban Forest Management Plan
o Conducted a class on all aspects of trees at the Anderson Center in October
o Assisted the Students Saving Salmon group by planting trees and shrubs at Shell Creek by the
Holy Rosary Church in March (mountain beavers destroyed previous plantings)
Tree Board Member Donna Murphy reviewed:
• Photographs of Tree Board Members and activities
• Tree Board Current Work
o Continue to distribute `Before you grab that chainsaw...' and Small Trees brochures
o Continue to provide input on the Urban Forest Management Program and a Tree Code
o Continue education and stewardship — Earth Day, Farmer's Market, Arbor Day
o Continue to partner with Students Saving Salmon
o Work with the newly hired full-time Arborist for the city
o Partner with the Edmonds Library on a workshop for children on the importance of trees in
the environment
2020 Plans in Summary (COVID-19 dependent)
o Educate and assist through various activities and events including:
■ Earth Day event (Yost Park Clean-up)
■ Summer market
■ Downtown educational tree tags
■ Edmonds in Bloom garden tour with tree identification
■ Arbor Day Tree planting with Parks Department
■ Workshop for children at the Edmonds Library
Councilmember Buckshnis recognized Co -Chair Barbara Chase who was also present virtually. As the
Council liaison to the Tree Board, Councilmember Buckshnis looked forward to the tree code and
thanked the Tree Board for their volunteer efforts.
Councilmember Olson thanked the Tree Board Members for being here tonight. She looked forward to
the library youth program, a new initiative since she left the Tree Board, and one of the many programs
awaiting the end of COVID-19. She referred to the "Before You Grab the Chainsaw" pamphlet, a work
product created a couple years ago that is a truly a gift that keeps on giving. She encouraged citizens who
believe they have a problem tree to pick up the brochure from the Green Center at City Hall before
proceeding. The brochure describes many options besides cutting down a tree and provides contact
information for the Tree Board and City staff for questions. She thanked the Tree Board for developing
that pamphlet and to City staff for their support of those initiatives.
Council President Pro Tem Paine thanked the Tree Board, commented she was on Tree Board in the past
and was impressed with their progress particularly in the schools and the library. She recalled having an
education section on the Tree Board agenda and suggested that be considered. She congratulated the Tree
Board on their work and expressed her thanks for the presentation.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked the Tree Board and Co -Chair Caruso and Board Member Murphy for
their presentation. She appreciated the tree tags, noting she and her family read the tree tags when going
for walks. The Tree Board is an example of education combined with policy and the Tree Board is doing
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 7
Packet Pg. 10
6.1.a
their part to educate and reach the community. She plans to research mountain beavers, having never
heard of that animal.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas thanked Co -Chairs Caruso and Chase and Board Member Murphy for
their volunteer efforts.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (https://zoom.us/s/4257752525)
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas invited participants and described the procedures for audience
comments.
There were no public comments.
(Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.)
7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L.
JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 25, 2020
2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS
3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM ERIC MESSENGER
($4,322.16)
4. COMPENSATION FOR LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO COUNCIL
8. PUBLIC HEARING (https://zoom.us/s/4257752525)
1. HAINES WHARF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING
Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained this is a City -initiated Comprehensive Plan
amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Mixed Use Commercial to Open Space
to implement the Shoreline Management Program (SMP) which changed the Shoreline designation of the
site a few years ago. He provided an aerial image of the area, advising the Comprehensive Plan change
applies to four parcels; two parcels are privately owned, one is owned by the City of Edmonds, and one is
owned by Snohomish County. The current zoning of the parcels is Commercial Waterfront (CW). A
rezone of the site will likely follow should the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Mr. Lien reviewed:
Old Shoreline Designation
o Urban Mixed Use Environment. Same designation the Port of Edmonds had. These areas
have been intensely developed with a mix of commercial uses, port facilities, multimodal
transit facilities, railroad facilities and limited light industrial uses.
Current Shoreline Designation
o Aquatic I (Low Intensity). These areas are mostly characterized by aquatic ecosystems that
have been modified by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bed fill that covers the
intertidal and transitional upland zones along the beach. The beach has been altered by
seawalls or large -rock riprap. These shoreline areas generally exhibit low -intensity
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 8
Packet Pg. 11
6.1.a
development and few overwater structures. In freshwater areas, there may be a significant
number of docks and piers serving residential areas.
Site history
o Wooden barn -like structure barged in 1939
■ Original Haines Wharf operated as a full -service fishing facility for 30 years
o Meadowdale Marina added in 1975
o No business license since 2001
o Commercial uses no longer allowed at the site
■ Structures and commercial uses are nonconforming
- When a nonconforming use ceases for a period of a year, any use of the site has to be
consistent with current regulations.
- While commercial uses cannot occur at the site, it can be still used for private uses
such as boat storage
o Shoreline Substantial Permit issued in 2005
■ None of the other required permits were issued
o Identified in the SMP as a restoration site
ECDC 20.00.050: Amendment to the comprehensive plan may be adopted only if the following
findings are made:
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan and is in the public interest;
B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or
welfare of the city;
C. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the
city; and
D. In the case of an amendment to the comprehensive policy plan map, the subject parcels are
physically suitable for the requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use
development(s), including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with
adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints.
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan
o Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to
take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being consistent and compatible
with the character of its surrounding neighborhood. All commercial development should be
designed and located so that it is economically feasible to operate a business and provide
goods and services to Edmonds
o A.2 Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or
will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should
be reclassified for other uses.
o Application of above to these parcels:
■ Located in a residential neighborhood
■ Can only be accessed via local streets
■ Unsignaled railroad crossing
■ Not compatible with surrounding neighborhood and no safe access
o ECDC 24.60.030.D.9 Aquatic 1. Commercial and light industrial use and development are
prohibited, except that water -dependent uses and appurtenant structures may be permitted
subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline area
designation.
■ Two abutting upland shoreline environments (Urban Railroad and Shoreline Residential
1) prohibit commercial uses and development
■ Site should be reclassified to Open Space consistent with Commercial Development Goal
A.2
• Open Space
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 9
Packet Pg. 12
6.1.a
o Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the
character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies.
■ A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces:
■ A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are linked
wildlife corridors or habitats of rare or endangered species.
o Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on
Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and
waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies:
■ B.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special
consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs.
o Numerous fish and wildlife species depend on the Edmonds shoreline and adjacent shoreland
habitats for either part or all of their life stages.
o Eight species of salmonids
o Endangered and threatened species: Puget Sound Chinook, bull trout, Steller sealion, and
Puget Sound Orcas
o Open Space Goal B specifically recognizes that the Puget Sound and our saltwater shorelines
should receive special consideration for preservation.
o Open Space designation is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
Not Detrimental
o The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety or
welfare of the City;
■ Implements the Shoreline Master Program
■ Help preserve and enhance habitat for federally listed species
■ Access via unsignaled crossing safety concern
■ Low intensity Open Space designation is more appropriate for the site
Appropriate balance of land uses
o The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the
City;
■ One other area with Mixed Use Commercial designation
■ Urban upland areas more appropriate for commercial uses than Puget Sound tide lands
■ Other areas with commercial designations
■ Removal of this nonconforming site will not impact the appropriate balance of land uses
Physically suitable
o In the case of an amendment to the comprehensive policy plan map, the subject parcels are
physically suitable for the requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use
developments(s), including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility
with adjoining land uses and absence of physical constraints.
■ Not physically suitable for current Mixed Use Commercial designation
■ Landward neighborhood is single-family residential area
■ Site can only be accessed via local roads
■ Railroad tracks imposed a physical obstacle to access site
■ SMP prohibits commercial uses and development
■ Proposed Open Space is more appropriate for intended land use and more compatible
with the adjoining land uses
Planning Board recommendation
o Planning Board held a public hearing on April 10, 2019 and forwarded a recommendation of
approval
o Staff recommends tentative approval
■ Final approval would be at the end of the year with a single ordinance for all 2020
Comprehensive Plan amendments
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 10
Packet Pg. 13
6.1.a
Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Finis Tupper, Edmonds, asked whether the Comprehensive Plan map change was on Comprehensive
Plan amendment docket as required by the Growth Management Hearings Act. He recalled the Council
was told this property was worthless and asked whether any Councilmembers had visited the Snohomish
County Assessor's website and learned the property is valued at $171,000. The value dropped in 2003
after a significant storm damaged the property. The Assessor's website also indicates the property owner
is 3-4 years delinquent on taxes. There were tax foreclosures on other properties that are part of this
Comprehensive Plan map change. He questioned why the City would make this Comprehensive Plan
change now if there is a possibility it will be acquired by Snohomish County via a tax foreclosure. He
referred to Mr. Lien's indication that mail had been returned from another property owner, Jeri Ann
Merritt. He sent an email to the Council regarding public participation and public notice and the address
the City uses to notify property owners. The Assessor's website shows that the taxpayer address and the
owner address are different for the parcel owned by Jeri Ann Merritt; the Assessor uses the taxpayer
address. He requested the Council do some investigation before making a decision.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas closed the public hearing at 8:11
p.m.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether this had been docketed last year, recalling the first meeting was
in January 2019 and the advisory report is dated April 2019. Mr. Lien explained it was originally
docketed for 2019. As he explained in the previous presentation, it was carried forward into 2020 because
the City was approached by someone interested in the purchasing the property. Councilmember
Buckshnis asked if it needed to be re -docket or could it be carried forward. City Attorney Jeff Taraday
said he was not completely certain whether the code addressed that. Development Services Director
Shane Hope advised docketing is an informal process and is not addressed at any length in the code nor in
the Growth Management Act. There is a lot of flexibility in how it can be done by a local government and
amendments can be carried forward from year to year. Mr. Taraday said the primary purpose of docketing
is to provide an inventory of amendments and ensure they are done comprehensively; docketing identifies
what is on that year's to-do list. In this case, citizens had more than enough notice about this
Comprehensive Plan amendment and the intent of docketing is met. Councilmember Buckshnis said for
citizens who were looking for this on the docket and did not find it or remember that it was docketed in
2019, it is a matter of transparency.
Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas advised questions would be taken in a round robin format.
Councilmember Olson said the issues Mr. Tupper raised were the crux of the questions she asked at the
previous presentation, whether there was an impact to value as a result of this change and if the property
owner is in arrears on the taxes, allowing that transition of ownership to happen so there is no recourse or
liability to a municipality for making a change that might impact the value. She acknowledged it had been
discussed that there would be no impact to the value because permits have not been obtained. If there was
even a chance of a court case, she questioned whether it would be of value to spent a week and have the
City Attorney determine if there was value in not moving forward and allowing the process to continue
without interference.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled during the previous presentation, there was discussion about the
property owner, Vladan Milosavljevic (Milo) and asked if the wrong type of public notice was being
provided to the other property owner mentioned by Mr. Tupper. Mr. Lien answered the code requires
provide notice be provided to the property owner; the mailing list uses the property owner's address from
the tax parcel information and that was used for mailings regarding this change.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 11
Packet Pg. 14
6.1.a
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why the City would change the Comprehensive Plan designation to
Open space when there was value to the property and taxes were in arrears which means Snohomish
County would foreclose and take ownership. Mr. Lien explained the reason the Comprehensive Plan
amendment was proposed was to follow through with the SMP update. The SMP update was a very
extensive process with a lot of public input. Commercial use is not allowed at the site under the SMP, this
amendment will bring the Comprehensive Plan and SMP into consistency. Ms. Hope said consistency is
important to the SMP and the Comprehensive Plan and the code needs to be updated to reflect it.
Comprehensive Plan amendments generally happen only once a year so this is a good time. The value is
still there for the owner to use the property for private recreation. Whether Snohomish County goes
through a foreclosure process will occur in the future and it may or may not happen.
Councilmember Olson asked about the downside to waiting for a foreclosure action. Either the property
owner will pay taxes or there will be a foreclosure. Ms. Hope said the property owner could pay the taxes.
Councilmember Olson said if that happened, the Council should make this decision, but if they didn't,
waiting would reduce the City's liability. Ms. Hope said this meets the criteria for a Comprehensive Plan
change. Mr. Taraday said the tax status of a property is not listed among the items the Council is to
consider when determining whether to proceed with a Comprehensive Plan amendment. He recalled Mr.
Lien reviewed the code requirements; whether the taxes on a parcel are in full or are in arrears or on the
verge of foreclosure is not relevant to this decision from a regulatory standpoint. If the issue was whether
the City will lose money it would otherwise be able to collect through a tax sale, he said the numbers
would need to be run on, 1) the likelihood that there would be a tax sale because even if Snohomish
County forecloses on a property, that does not mean anyone will bid on it or pay the tax bill, and 2) he
speculated the reason the taxes haven't been paid is because the owner realizes there is not enough value
in the property to warrant paying the taxes.
Council President Pro Tern Paine said she was curious why taxes come into the discussion. The City was
not purchasing property nor forcing anyone to do anything, the proposal was to change the
Comprehensive Plan designation to be consistent with the SMP.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed the Comprehensive Plan and the SMP need to be consistent. The next
step will be to rezone the property to open space which will reduce the value, but that is a separate topic.
Councilmember Olson said the concept of a tax sale did not cross her mind, she was more concerned
about the impact to the value of a rezone and whether the landowner wanted to make an issue of that with
the City. She suggested waiting to make a decision until next week, recalling the Council's practice of not
to taking action the same night as the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON, TO
MOVE THIS ITEM TO NEXT WEEK.
Councilmember L. Johnson said this is the second time the Council has discussed this item and the
second time staff has made a presentation. She was uncertain what additional information would be
provided and questioned asking staff to make a third presentation. She would consider having it on next
week's Consent Agenda.
Council President Pro Tern Paine asked if there were any outlying issues. She had similar concerns about
moving it to next week which is committee night. Mr. Taraday said even if the Council moves forward
with the Comprehensive Plan amendment and ultimately with the zoning that Mr. Lien mentioned, the
property still has moorage value. Even if a hotel could not be built on the dock, boats could still be
moored on the dock which has economic value. From a regulatory takings analysis standpoint, this would
not completely eliminate the value due to the remaining moorage use. Given the limited use that has been
made of the property over the last 20 years, he did not see that this action would change that. It was hard
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 12
Packet Pg. 15
6.1.a
for him to see justification for a plaintiff to bring a cause of action for a regulatory taking against the City
and doubted any such lawsuit would have merit.
Councilmember Distelhorst pointed out the agenda packet stated tentative approval and asked if staff
needed a motion tonight or would a motion of unanimous consent be sufficient as it would come back as
the Comprehensive Plan update later in the year. Ms. Hope suggested a motion of tentative approval
would be appropriate, agreeing final approval would be done with the remaining Comprehensive Plan
changes at the end of the year.
Councilmember L. Johnson agreed the Council was being asked to provide tentative approval and final
approval will occur later this year.
Councilmember Olson clarified the Council could make a change if something some to light between now
and final approval. Ms. Hope and Mr. Taraday answered yes.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH APPROVAL OF THE
SECOND.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
DISTELHORST, TO TENTATIVELY APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
CHANGE FROM MIXED USE COMMERCIAL TO OPEN SPACE. UPON ROLL CALL,
MOTION CARRIED (7-0), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PRO TEM PAINE, COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, DISTELHORST, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON,
AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES.
9. ACTION ITEMS
1. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR 184TH STREET SW STREET VACATION
Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien recognized Engineering Program Manager Jeanie
McConnell who was virtually present for this item. He recalled a public hearing was set last year for this
street vacation and subsequently withdrawn. He displayed a vicinity map and identified four parcels
associated with the future development of the site in the Perrinville area. He identified the street vacation,
a portion of 184'.
Mr. Lien reviewed the big picture:
• Street vacation
• Street Map amendment
o Street Map identifies future potential rights -of -way
o Subdivision process may require dedication
• Potential future subdivision
• Review processes
o Type V — Street map amendment and street vacation
o Type III — subdivision
o Code requires street vacation and street map amendment prior to subdivision application
Mr. Lien identified the area in a future subdivision that likely would be required to be dedicated to the
City to bring the road up to City standards. The existing right-of-way is 20 feet wide, a 40 foot right-of-
way width would be required. He identified the area at the end of 184t1i that likely would be vacated. The
last public hearing was postponed because the appropriate area to be vacated was uncertain and more
work needed to be done on the subdivision to determine the size and location of the turnaround. He
identified the location of a future pedestrian easement to provide a connection to Olympic View Drive.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 13
Packet Pg. 16
6.1.a
There are numerous utilities on the site including a 20-inch watermain, storm facilities and a sanitary
sewer; easements will be acquired during a future development. This agenda item is not review of the
subdivision; the subdivision information is provided as part of the big picture. The public hearing will
include further discussion about the process.
Mr. Lien reviewed:
Review Criteria
o Street vacation — ECDC 20.70.020
■ Vacation is in public interest
■ No property will be denied direct access
o Street Map Amendment — ECDC 20.65.010
■ Purposes of the Comprehensive Plan
■ Purposes of the Comprehensive Street Plan
■ Purposes of the Official Street Map
State and City code require the City Council fix a time via resolution for the public hearing on the
street vacation
o RCW 35.79.010 and ECDC 20.70.070 requires the City Council to fix a time by resolution
for public hearing on any proposed street vacation
o The hearing can occur no less than 20 days and no more than 60 days after the passage of the
resolution
o Resolution included in packet sets a public hearing date of October 6, 2020
o Street map amendment public hearing will occur same evening
o A staff report on the proposal will be prepared for the public hearing
Council President Pro Tern Paine thanked Mr. Lien for answering her extensive questions and offering to
review the process with her.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she received several calls from citizens today; many people were
unaware this was happening and there are a group of Perrinville residents opposed to this process. She
recalled Mr. Lien stating one of the considerations for the vacations was whether it was in the public
interest. She referred to an email that stated the righthand portion of 184t' is close to some very large
Douglas fir trees, some that are approximately 48 inches in diameter, surveyed in 2005. Councilmember
Buckshnis asked if this was really in the public's best interest, a huge development that will vacate
property that has large Douglas fir trees on it. She noted people are concerned because Douglas fir trees
are being cut down all the time. Mr. Lien said he will respond to the criteria in detail at the public hearing.
Councilmember Buckshnis said a lot of people are upset that this is coming forth and she wished there
would have been more transparency so more people could have commented on it. Mr. Lien said notice
will be provided of the public hearing; once the public hearing date is set, the site will be posted and
notice mailed to surrounding property owners. Councilmember Buckshnis said this is being done
backward; she would prefer to look at the subdivision prior to the streets and the street vacation, noting
low impact development could retain trees and not require the street vacation. She summarized it seemed
backward, doing the vacation before looking at the big picture of the subdivision.
COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON,
TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1455, A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
SETTING OCTOBER 6, 2020 FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF
A PORTION OF 184TH STREET SW BETWEEN 80TH AVENUE W AND OLYMPIC VIEW
DRIVE.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she will abstain because she thinks the process is backwards.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 14
Packet Pg. 17
6.1.a
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS,
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE, AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
DISTELHORST, OLSON, AND L. JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING.
2. LEARNING ENHANCEMENT & ACTIVITY PROGRAM (LEAP)
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director Angie Feser explained this item, LEAP program job
description approval and fee waiver, is a follow-up to last week's presentation. She reviewed:
• Objective: Council consideration of
o Approval of two job descriptions to support the implementation of the LEAP program
o Possible direction for additional funding of registration fees waivers
• We are living, working and operating in unprecedented times due to the COVID pandemic which
require adaptive recreation programming to meet community needs within new health and safety
guidelines
• Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department has been innovative and identified LEAP in
response to the community's need for safe and affordable day camp programming that also
provides support of distance learning for Edmonds children.
• Program feasibility shifted to full development with ESD's recent announcement that it was
implementing full-time distance learning
o Day camp program with academic support for Edmonds children and families who may not
have the ability to work from home and support children's education
■ Program evolving nearly daily
■ Fluid time and program can be flexible based on community needs
• Basics:
■ Nine isolated rooms/pods in the Frances Anderson Center and Library Plaza Room
■ Rooms/pods isolated from each other and building tenants
■ Each room will have 8-22 children of similar grade level with a minimum of 2 staff and
larger rooms having 3 staff to provide a minimum of 10:1 child/staff ratio
■ Each child will have a 6 foot table and chair with at least 6-foot social distancing between
each table
■ Gymnasium = flex space
■ Anderson playfield also used
2nd -6 th grade
■ 7 pm - 6 pm/pods 8:30 am - 4:30 pm
■ Traditional day camp/recreation activities supported by environmental education and
cultural arts programs as well as SnoKing Youth Club
■ Academic support
- ESD distance learning program
- WiFi in building
■ 100 participant capacity
■ $300 resident/$345 non-resident weekly fee
■ 20% of participants full waiver
LEAP Safety
o Will adhere to current COVID Guidelines
■ Federal/CDC
■ State of Washington
■ Snohomish Health District
■ City Operating Policies/Procedures
Day Camp/Recreation Programs
o Staff training
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 15
Packet Pg. 18
6.1.a
■ New COVID protocols and practices, safety procedures such as building evacuation
■ All staff required to have first aid and CPR certification
o Safety practices/protocols
■ Mask wearing, social distancing, frequent cleaning and sanitation, pod group isolation,
program drop-off/pick-up outside the facility, health screenings and related activities that
support safety of staff, participants and families as well as other building tenants
LEAP is within the 2020 Recreation Division budget so a budget amendment is not required
o Proposed budget has capacity and capability to be cost neutral due to being a service -based
model and has the flexibility due to weekly registration and adjusting to related staff needs
o Program budget is calculated on staff cost averages as it changes over the course of the 9-
month program
o Staff will be hired as temporary, non -benefited employees for the first five months
o If program continues, staff will transition to permanent, benefited employees for last four
months
o The 4 1 % additional cost of benefits is calculated into staff costs
■ LEAP Budget: 100% capacity
Revenue
Qty
Unit
Total Monthly
Amount
9-Month
Amount
Full Fee ($300)
80
$300
$96,000
$864,000
Full Waiver
20
$-
$-
$-
TOTAL
$96,000
$864,000
Expenditures
Ift-
Qty
Unit/Each
Total Monthly
9-Month
Amount
Staff
Program Coordinator - Recreation Coordinator
1
$6,491
$6,419
$57,767
Recreation Leader II - (8 hours)
9
$4,064
$36,573
$329,159
Recreation Leader - General (8 hours)
9
$3,488
$31,394
$282,543
Recreation Leader - General (5.5 hours)
4
$1,962
$7,848
$70,636
Comcast WiFi
1
$100
$100
$900
ActiveNet (registration technology fee)
$4,080
$36,720
Supplies
9
$100
$900
$8,100
Contingency
1
$4,800
$4,800
$43,200
TOTAL
$92,114
$829,024
Difference
$3,886
$34,976
o Additional one-time expenses:
■ $3,810 Start -Up Costs (equipment, COVID supplies
■ $15,000 WiFi Improvements (eligible for CARES funding reimbursement)
LEAP Budget: 50% capacity
Revenue
Qty
Unit
Total Monthly
Amount
9-Month
Amount
Full Fee ($300)
50
$300
$60,000
$540,000
Full Waiver
0
$-
$-
$-
TOTAL
$60,000
$540,000
Expenditures
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 16
Packet Pg. 19
6.1.a
Qty
Unit/Each
Total Monthly
9-Month
Amount
Staff
Program Coordinator - Recreation Coordinator
1
$6,491
$6,419
$57,767
Recreation Leader II - (Pod Lead)
5
$4,064
$18,287
$164,580
Recreation Leader - General (8 hours)
5
$3,488
$15,697
$141,271
Recreation Leader - General (5.5 hours)
4
$1,962
$7,848
$70,636
Comcast WiFi
1
$100
$100
$900
ActiveNet (registration technology fee
$2,550
$22,950
Supplies
9
$100
$450
$4,050
Contingency
1
$3,000
$3,000
$27,000
TOTAL
$54,350
$489,153
Difference
$5,650
$50,847
o Additional one-time expenses:
■ $3,810 Start -Up Costs (equipment, COVID supplies
■ $15,000 WiFi Improvements (eligible for CARES funding reimbursement)
LEAP - Staff positions
o Two positions require Council approval of the job description:
■ Recreation Leader II (new)
■ Recreation Leader -General (revised)
■ New positions have higher qualification requirements due to academic support
component of program which is not typical of a day camp. Objective is to be able to hire
staff with qualifications such as substitute teachers, paraeducators, college students
studying to become teachers or similar profession who may currently be out of work.
0 18 FTE (9 rooms/2 staff)
0 4 PTE (AM/PM program, assist)
0 1/4 - 1/3 of new employees are predicted to be rehired City recreation staff who are currently
not working, including environmental education camp staff, interpretive rangers and
gymnastic staff
Ms. Feser explained the program is currently able to support full registration waivers for 20% of weekly
participants. Council requested staff research providing additional waivers. The options are only through
the end of the calendar year due to grant restrictions. She suggested Council consider the options through
the end of the year and revisit options for 2021 via the budget process. She reviewed:
• Registration Fee Wavier Options/Update
o City Funding - End of Year
■ Option #1: Direct allocation (Council Contingency or General Fund)
Fee Waiver Options
Monthly
End of Year
(10) Waivers @ 50%
$6,000
$18,000
(20) Waivers @ 50%
$12,000
$36,000
(10) Waivers @ 100%
$12,000
$36,000
(20) Waivers @ 100%
$24,000
$72,000
Option #2: CARES allocation
- Eligible for childcare
- Unable by time of this presentation to obtain a City CARES fund balance
- Department of Commerce may provide additional CARES funding to cities
o Outside sources
■ Verdant Health
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 17
Packet Pg. 20
6.1.a
- Submitted application last week to Emergency COVID Assistant program to support
5-10 full registrations/$18,000 - $36,000 through the end of the year
■ Office of Public Schools and Instruction (OPSI)
■ Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
■ Campaign soliciting donations from individuals and community partners to City's
scholarship fund
LEAP - Council Action/Direction
1. Council approval of two proposed job descriptions of Recreation Leader II and Recreation
Leader -General to support the LEAP program.
2. Possible direction for additional funding of registration fee waivers.
o Weekly registration quantity -how many? Full/partial?
o Funding source -Council Contingency or General Fund, CARES or ?
o OR further study?
Regarding staff positions, Councilmember Olson said she did not see a reference to bilingualism and
suggested that be added as preferred. She asked whether any of the existing staff were bilingual. Ms.
Feser answered she has not met many of Parks' former employees. She agreed a bilingual skill set would
be a bonus.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked about $4800 for a contingency fund, commenting that was not usually
part of a program expenditure. Ms. Feser said that was built in for unknowns as COVID requirements,
this program, etc. are rapidly changing. The contingency would provide wiggle room to absorb the cost of
implementing any new COVID requirements from the state or the health district. Councilmember
Buckshnis asked how the amount of $4800 was determined. Ms. Feser said it represented 5% of revenue.
Councilmember Buckshnis said a few people have asked her why, if this program assists the Edmonds
School District (ESD), the district was not providing financial assistance. Ms. Feser answered it was not
necessarily helping the ESD, but helping families educate their children. The district did not ask the City
to run this program, it was identified as a community need to help families who have to make a decision
between going to work and supporting their children's education. This is not a school or substituting for
school, it is simply creating an environment that supports school -age children in their academic efforts
while they are doing distance learning and participating in day camp activities.
Councilmember Buckshnis said teachers are wondering if kids coming to camp will actually be doing
online school that the ESD is making available versus babysitting. Ms. Feser answered the program will
provide an environment to allow that work to happen and to provide support. There will be WiFi in the
building, children will be grouped in like grades and each child via their Chromebook will be able to do
their work. Program staff will be aware of the ESD schedule and times and each program participant's
schedule and staff will provide assistance. Staff cannot 100% guarantee all a child's work will be done
when they leave building. When there are eight children in a room doing 11/2 hours of work on their
Chromebook, there is not much else to do but schoolwork. She summarized staff will be supporting that
work, but it is not school.
Councilmember Buckshnis wanted to ensure that was made very clear to the families. She was concerned
the program would be blamed if a student failed. Ms. Feser said staff has been very careful with the
language used in the literature, not using "teacher" or "student" but using "participant, day camp, and rec
leaders." A parent handbook is being developed that will be shared with each family in the program that
clarifies the expectations regarding what staff can provide and what is expected of children in the
program.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 18
Packet Pg. 21
6.1.a
Councilmember Buckshnis commented Parks is 15% below budget, although there has not been a recent
update on financials. She asked if some of the teachers would be reemployed staff. Ms. Feser answered an
example would be the environmental and education program, beach rangers who were released due to
COVID and the City not operating that program, those individuals would be rehired for this program if
they are qualified and interested. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there would be new job descriptions
for the recreation staff working under the Recreation Leaders. Ms. Feser said there are three different
Recreation Leader categories. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Ms. Feser for the updated packet and
financial information.
Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas thanked Ms. Feser for developing this program. As parent who has had a
child in the ESD, she could not imagine working and provide supervision and education for her child.
This is really good for the City and people who need some extra support. She was proud to live in a city
where this program was being offered.
As an ESD parent, Councilmember Distelhorst appreciated what the City was putting together. He asked
how the program would support students on free or reduced lunch. Ms. Feser answered staff asked the
ESD about being involved in the nutrition program; during the summer the ESD has provided meals/food
to families in the free and reduced program. ESD plans to continue with the model they utilized during
the summer where a week's worth of food per child is available for at a central location, typically a
school, once a week. Councilmember Distelhorst summarized it will be incumbent on students to pick up
the food and bring it to the program. Ms. Feser agreed.
Council President Pro Tem Paine thanked Ms. Feser and her staff for putting this program together.
Having a rec leader person on one side of the computer screen and a teacher on the other side will be
beneficial to families. As a parent who relied heavily on childcare services, she always looked for
maximum hours so she was pleased by the program's hours. With regard to the budget, she looked
forward to having more information when it gets closer to the budget season.
Councilmember L. Johnson commended Ms. Feser and her department for their dedication in creating this
innovative program to meet community needs, providing safe and affordable day camp, and serving
parents who cannot work from home. After the Council has their questions answered, she will make a
motion for approval. With regard to additional funding of fee waivers, she asked whether it would be
appropriate to direct staff to come back next week with more information on CARES funding, what might
need to change to allow CARES funding to be used, and updated information on potential funding
sources. Ms. Feser that timing would be tight as it would provide only two days to put information
together to be included in the packet. The challenge is not knowing the balance in the City's CARES fund
and that will not be available within two days. The urgency tonight is approval of the job description. She
was more than happy to return in two weeks with more information about the fee waiver program and
funding sources.
With regard to fee waivers, Councilmember Olson said schools not opening is definitely a COVID impact
and there may be families who were doing okay up until they experienced the additional expense of
daycare that was not previously needed. She anticipated there would be more people seeking personal
CARES grants than there were previously. She reiterated Councilmember K. Johnson's point last week
that with the small number of children the City's program can accommodate, it is a just a piece of the pie.
She suggested the Council allow CARES funds to be used for this program or any other daycare. She was
impressed with the number of possible funding sources that had been identified.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
PAINE, TO APPROVE THE TWO JOB DESCRIPTIONS, RECREATION LEADER II AND
RECREATION LEADER - GENERAL (REVISED) IN ORDER FOR THE PARKS, RECREATION
AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO IMPLEMENT A NEW PROGRAM..
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 19
Packet Pg. 22
6.1.a
Councilmember Olson suggested adding a preference for bilingualism, particularly the languages most
often needed in ESD. Ms. Feser agreed she would include that.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas declared a brief recess
3. RECONSIDERATION FROM LAST WEEK'S MEETING REGARDING
SUBCOMMITTEE FORMATION, FORMED BY CITY COUNCIL RATHER THAN
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L.
JOHNSON, TO RECONSIDER THE SUBCOMMITTEE FORMATION AND THE SELECTION
OF ITS MEMBERS.
Council President Pro Tem Paine said after a lot of consideration, she has decided to change her vote as
she believed the Council should adhere to the normal process.
Councilmember Olson said she thought the way the vote went last time was very positive as was an
outcome that would affect the democratic process and having the Council decide the members would
ensuring there was a cross section of Councilmembers on the committee.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS,
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PAINE AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST AND L.
JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON
VOTING NO.
City Attorney Jeff Taraday said although he was personally of the opinion that a motion to reconsider was
not proper, the intent of the motion was very clear, to undo last week's action. Last week's action has now
been undone and there is no motion on the floor regarding what to do next with regard to a subcommittee.
Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, the agenda item was for reconsideration which has
been done and not regarding the committee formation.
Council President Pro Tem Paine raised a point of order, at the last meeting the Council made a decision
regarding a subcommittee and that is still the decision of the Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas raised a point of clarification, the Council voted previously to form a
committee. Council President Pro Tem Paine clarified her motion was to reconsider who decided who
would be on the subcommittee and its configuration. The Council already determined it would form a
subcommittee.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she hoped to see this on next week's agenda.
Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas advised this would be on the agenda for further discussion in two weeks
as next week is committee night.
10. STUDY ITEMS
1. TREE REGULATIONS CODE PROCESS UPDATE
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 20
Packet Pg. 23
6.1.a
Development Services Director Shane Hope explained there had been a lot of process related to tree
regulations and staff had been waiting to do more until after the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP)
was adopted. That has been accomplished and staff has been gathering information to move forward. Mr.
Lien will provide a brief overview of the process and topics, but the details still need to be worked out.
The process will include the Planning Board, consultation with Tree Board, as well as a public process.
Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained the tree code has been in the works for a number
of years. Once the UFMP was adopted, the tree code update began. Late last year and early this year, the
City considered hiring a half-time code writer but that has not been done for various reasons including
COVID. The packet includes a matrix with broad topics of discussion that were identified via comments
from the Council, the public and during the UFMP process. All code updates go through the Planning
Board; the Planning Board will get into the details, hold a public hearing, consult with the Tree Board,
and provide a recommendation to the City Council.
Mr. Lien explained the topics in the matrix are generally in priority order. He anticipated draft code with a
Planning Board recommendation would be provided to City Council by the end of the year, likely in
pieces due to priorities. One of the priorities is tree retention with development; the way to accomplish
that is with low impact development and providing flexibility that results in more tree retention when
properties are redeveloped. Another high priority is a tree fund that could be used to provide tree vouchers
to property owners for tree planting, funded through tree cutting violations, trees cut during development,
or other means. The intent is to develop code provisions related to incentives for retaining trees during
development as well as in general such as was mentioned by the Tree Board in the "Before You Pick Up a
Chainsaw" brochure. Some incentives identified in the UFMP include property tax rebates, stormwater
fees, utility reductions, or other financial incentives.
Mr. Lien explained there are several other specific details that need to be addressed in the update such as
tree definitions; other cities have definitions for significant trees, heritage trees, protected trees, etc.
Another issue is permitting processes, tree cutting on single family property is largely exempt but
occasionally a permit is required such as if there are critical areas or it is a large developable property.
There are two different processes for single family properties versus multifamily properties and some
disparity in the process and fees. For example if a single family parcel is not exempt, it is a Type II which
has a $1,000 application fee. A commercial or multifamily site is a Type I decision which has a $350
application fee. The penalties and fines would also be considered as well as the location of the tree code
in the regulations. The topic matrix provides more details. The Planning Board will be provided an
overview next Wednesday and begin reviewing draft code by October.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mr. Lien for sharing the old code with the Tree Board which helped a
lot. She expressed interest in moving forward codes related to development and subcategories like low
impact development forward, noting the schedule was very ambitious. She asked if that would impact the
Housing Commission and whether the process needed to wait for them to finish. Ms. Hope said her intent
was to move forward because tree regulations have been a big issue for a long time. If the Housing
Commission identifies something that will affect this, it can be addressed in 2021. Important work has
begun and citizens are interested in getting something done, beginning with tree retention requirements
and low impact development options.
Councilmember Distelhorst appreciated the broad matrix. He referred to reports from other communities
in the Puget Sound region regarding heat islands and the role that a lack of trees plays in the development
of heat islands and how they are disproportionately in lower income housing areas. He asked if that could
be taken into account to ensure there is tree coverage throughout the City. Ms. Hope said that is primarily
related to bigger cities whether there is a lot of pavement and less relevant to cities like Edmonds as a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 21
Packet Pg. 24
6.1.a
distinguishing characteristic, but that would be kept in mind. Councilmember Distelhorst said that would
be beneficial as some neighborhoods and Highway 99 get more developed.
Councilmember Olson said the matrix made it easy for Councilmembers to understand staff s thought
processes and priorities. Having been on the Tree Board, she agreed with stormwater utility fee reduction.
With regard to low impact development, she and other Councilmembers noticed during the agenda item to
set a public hearing for a street vacation how many trees were on that lot. She recalled staff mentioned
there were critical areas on the site and tree retention requirements that may be in excess of what is
typical. With regard to a tree fund, the matrix stated it could be used for other tree related activities; she
preferred the tree fund only be used to incentivize tree planting. If someone was paying into the tree fund
because they were removing trees, the funds should be use to replace trees. She would prefer that, even it
was outside the City, to using the funds for education. She encouraged staff to offer a consultation with
the City Arborist on tree vouchers to assist with right tree right place.
Council President Pro Tern Paine expressed appreciation for the matrix, commenting it was exciting to
see what is being proposed for the tree code. She encouraged the retention of large trees whenever
possible, particularly in multifamily and commercial areas where housing is more affordable and there are
not as many parks. Any green spaces that include trees and nature would be helpful for the community
and the families growing up there.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed the tree canopy is not part of the tree code but the tree code will help
the tree canopy. She asked why the tree canopy assessment is done every ten years instead of every five
years. Ms. Hope recalled that was addressed in the UFMP. The reason is partially related to money; the
canopy assessment costs money and staff time so a ten-year window is more reasonable. If money and
staff resources were no object, it could be done every five years. The focus now needs to be on getting a
tree code adopted. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested after the tree code is adopted, a tree canopy
assessment be done sooner rather than later due to the number of developments that have occurred since
2015. She was aware of at least seven that had decimated large trees. It would be important to have an
accurate analysis now that the UFMP has been adopted and once the tree code is adopted.
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas relayed Mayor Nelson is out of town for family personal business and
was expected to return at the end of the week. She relayed a discussion with Councilmember Olson about
the inability to have Council reports on outside boards and committee due to lengthy Council meetings.
She suggested Councilmembers submit written reports that could be included in the packet for
Councilmembers and the public to read which is what the Snohomish Health District does. She invited
Council input; Councilmembers Distelhorst, Olson and Paine indicated their support for that idea.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented many outside boards and committees have not met recently.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said some Councilmembers have had a lot of outside board and
committee meetings and some have not.
Councilmember Pro Tern Paine suggested it would be important to have written reports.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested attaching the meeting minutes. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas
suggested Councilmembers write a summary or submit the minutes for inclusion in the packet.
Councilmember Olson suggested leaving it up to Councilmembers to decide whether to write a report or
to attach the minutes.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 22
Packet Pg. 25
6.1.a
Councilmember L. Johnson supported attaching the minutes as they provide more thorough information
and would provide more resources in the packet for citizens.
Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with allowing Councilmembers to decide whether to provide a
summary report or attach minute, noting one of the outside boards he is on doesn't do minutes until a
month after the meeting.
It was agreed Councilmembers would submit a brief written report or the meeting minutes.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Pro Tern Paine reported she attended a Port of Edmonds meeting yesterday. The Port is
very curious about economic development and what is occurring in the downtown core as it dramatically
affects them. She encouraged everyone to have a good week and wear to their masks.
With regard to COVID-19, Councilmember Olson said she read in an official source that individuals in
younger age groups (teens to early 24s) who vape are five times more likely to get COVID-19 compared
to their peers. Vaping is more or less an epidemic in the Edmonds School District. Kids shouldn't vape
because it is unknown if the increase is behavioral such as sharing equipment or a biological or
anatomical change to the lungs as a result of vaping.
With regard to the topic of suicide prevention, Councilmember Olson encouraged everyone during this
difficult time due to the pandemic and social unrest to make point of reaching out to friends or family
they haven't talked to in a while. On the flip side of social unrest, everyone has made a mistake and it is
important to be kind to people when they make mistake and bring them along in ways that aren't bullying
or unkind. She asked people to reach out and be part of the community.
Councilmember K. Johnson recalled the Council received a presentation last week on the 4' Avenue
Cultural Corridor. Only about 35 people participated including staff, half were residents in the corridor
and half were not. The intent is to bring a preferred alternative to Council in a couple weeks. She
encouraged everyone to visit the City's website to learn more about the 4tn Avenue Cultural Corridor and
participate in the online survey. The survey is primarily related to sidewalk width and the tradeoff with
parking, and one-way versus two-way.
COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND FOR THREE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Councilmember Distelhorst for his dedication and creative planning
in recognizing Suicide Prevention Month and organizing three community events. She expressed her
appreciation for Councilmember Distelhorst working with the Youth Commission to ensure their voices
were heard in the process. She was impressed with the depth of their questions and the quality of their
contribution. It was an impressive collaboration with many community partners working together to serve
citizens and to raise awareness on suicide prevention and work toward destigmatizing mental health. It is
a difficult subject and she looked forward to participating and learning more and promised to wear her pin
next week. She urged everyone to stay safe, wear masks and do your part to help our community.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Councilmember Distelhorst. She agreed with taking more action with
kindness. She agreed the Council needed an update on downtown, on the community fund, regarding the
homeless in the community, on financial statements, on the police chief who has been working two jobs
since January, and the finance director who has been working two jobs since March/April when Mr.
James was fired. The Council needs to ask these questions of the administration because citizens are
concerned, are asking questions and are anxious. If the information is not available, it needs to be
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 23
Packet Pg. 26
6.1.a
obtained. She urged everyone to practice calmness as well as provide information because a lot of people
are asking questions.
COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER L.
JOHNSON, TO EXTEND FOR FOUR MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Distelhorst thanked the youth and other community members who continue to be strong
voices for antiracism and justice in the community. He thanked the Council, staff and all the partners for
the suicide prevention work, everyone he asked said yes which he found very touching. He urged the
public to visit the WeCare.Edmondswa.gov website.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas reported she attended the student Black Lives Matter rally and was very
impressed it has been organized by young people in the community. It was very safe and well organized;
she walked with Representative Strom Peterson and his wife.
Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said she had not received a pin. With regard to Councilmember
Buckshnis' comment, Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas said we don't know that Mr. James has been fired,
he has left the City and she did not believe a termination was involved.
13. ADJOURN
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
PAINE, TO ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The Council meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 24
Packet Pg. 27
6.1.a
Public Comment for 9/1/20 City Council Meeting:
From: Ken Reidy
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:41 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Nelson, Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Judge,
Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; Passey, Scott <Scott.Passey@edmondswa.gov>; Hope,
Shane <Shane.Hope@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comments for September 1, 2020 City Council meeting -remember all persons attending
the meeting must be able to hear each other at the same time
Regarding Code Enforcement, history shows that Edmonds City Government has long allowed Selective
Enforcement, Different Rules for Different People. Failure executing the basic task of Code
Enforcement along with no accountability for such failure, greatly impairs citizen trust in Edmonds City
Government.
Per RCW 35A.12.100 and ECC 2.10.010, the Mayor SHALL see that all laws and ordinances are faithfully
enforced, and that law and order is maintained in the City. What authorizes the Mayor or his staff to
"prioritize" enforcement of our laws and ordinances?
Development Services Director Shane Hope represented to City Council on August 24, 2020 that City
Staff must make choices about how to best prioritize enforcement of the Edmonds Community
Development Code. She stated that "Generally, a top priority for the City is dealing with any imminent
safety or health issue per the City code".
What Code Section authorizes City Staff to make "choices"? Allowing "choices" enables Selective
Enforcement.
On September 16, 2010, over a year after the City had expended significant resources alleging Code
Violations (that did not involve safety or health issues), Steve Bernheim asked Scott Snyder and Kernen
Lien what is the difference between the Straub's case(attached) and Ken Reidy's case
regarding the applicability of the city's grandfather clause for nonconforming structures?
Snyder's response was his famous September 16, 2010 email to Bernheim that included the following:
"You are also aware of the liability issues relative to Thuesen that forced the city (administration)
to push the issue."
History suggests that Edmonds City Government thinks Code Enforcement is a tool that can be used to
push an issue when the City Attorney thinks the City might be exposed to liability issues. I hope all
can see the danger of allowing Code Enforcement to be arbitrary and capricious.
In the Reidy case, the City knew that Reidy's setbacks could be grandfathered if a letter from a
neighbor stated the building was there prior to 1981. Staff and City Attorney chose to keep what they
knew secret. Reidy found the law and proved that my building had been in existence prior to 1981.
Snyder represented to Hearing Examiner Sharon Rice that the Grandfathering Law did not apply to
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 25
Packet Pg. 28
6.1.a
Reidy's structure. The City CHOSE to not provide Rice the attached notes which show the City had
discussed applying the Grandfathering Law to my structure.
Hopefully, all can see how dangerous the tool of Code Enforcement can be if the Mayor, City Attorney
and City Staff are allowed to practice Selective Enforcement. Best to keep it simple and follow State
and City laws that say the Mayor SHALL see that all laws and ordinances are faithfully enforced, and that
law and order is maintained in the City.
From: Michael Murdock
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 2:37 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Downtown
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Murdock
Date: August 24, 2020 at 3:44:53 PM PDT
To: Council <council@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Downtown
Good Afternoon,
I walked the streets today and talked to some merchants and will continue talking to more. I suggest
you please do the same. I know a couple of you have already, one person mentioned it. I suggest you
start with Sound Styles, Savy Traveler and Saetia. They say that the Mayor and Doherty never respond or
listen. All they ask for is some consideration and common ground. Their businesses are suffering. I am
not sure these structures are even safe with virtually no protection from cars. Cars can slam right into
them easily from the side.
I found their stories very sad and sure I will find more. They appreciate that someone even asks or cares
I find that sad as well.
This sight and response from some merchants is not the Edmonds I have come to know.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 26
Packet Pg. 29
6.1.a
r
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 27
Packet Pg. 30
6.1.a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 28
Packet Pg. 31
6.1.a
a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 29
Packet Pg. 32
6.1.a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 30
Packet Pg. 33
6.1.a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 31
Packet Pg. 34
4
�ZUAIk�
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 1, 2020
Page 32
Packet Pg. 35
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/8/2020
Countywide Buildable Lands Program
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Citizens Housing Commission
Preparer: Debbie Rothfus
Background/History
A countywide program to identify buildable land supply in Snohomish County has been in place since the
late 1990s. It was originally required for the more urban counties in western Washington (and the cities
within them) as an amendment to the Growth Management Act.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The buildable lands review process is carried out through Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT), the
organization comprised of a partnership among the county, incorporated cities, and the Tulalip Tribes.
(Other organizations, such as transit agencies, are involved too.) In this process, each couny and the
cities within it must report every few years on its use of land to determine whether there is an adequate
land supply in urban areas for future population and job growth.
Countywide reports were completed, as required in 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017. In every report,
Edmonds had an adequate land supply. We are confident it still does.
A process for reviewing each city's current data has begun. A report of the findings is due on June 30,
2021.
At the Council's "committee of the whole" meeting on September 8, an overview of the Snohomish
County Buildable Lands Program will be provided by Steve Toy, Principal Demographer for Snohomish
County.
Packet Pg. 36
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/8/2020
Vision 2050 Update
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Citizens Housing Commission
Preparer: Debbie Rothfus
Background/History
Our central Puget Sound region, comprised of Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kitsap counties, has an
adopted regional plan, VISION 2040. The regional plan provides a guide for sustaining a healthy
environment, thriving communities, and a strong economy. Over the last three years, an updated plan-
-VISION 2050-- has been under development to replace VISION 2040.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The draft VISION 2050 has been developed to build on VISION 2040--but adding more focus on equity,
environment, and housing. It is under review but appears to be "rounding the bend" in terms of
progress. A final version is expected to be adopted this fall. Attached is a flyer about the project.
The plan will provide broad guidance to the counties and cities within our region. It also provides a basis
for regional transportation planning, which will guide decisions for allocating federal funds to
transportation projects.
At the September 8 City Council "committee of the whole" meeting, a presentation about the draft
VISION 2050 will be provided.
Attachments:
vision2050flyer
Packet Pg. 37
r
7.2.a
The Puget Sound Regional Council is extending the region's long-term
plan to 2050. As the region prepares to add 1.8 million more people and
1.2 million more jobs in the coming decades, VISION 2050 will provide a
guide for sustaining a healthy environment, thriving communities, and a
strong economy.
The region's vision for 2050.
The regional strategy helps preserve rural areas while encouraging
growth of vibrant cities and neighborhoods. In a recent survey, 67% of
residents said that it is important for governments to work together on a
regional growth strategy. PSRC worked with its members, stakeholders,
and other interested parties to develop a draft plan for review in 2019.
1040104
Puget Sound Regional Council
The region is humming
with activity as population
has surged to 4.1 million
in the last decade. More
growth is coming. New
forecasts show the region
needs to plan for 1.8
million additional people
and 1.2 million newjobs
by 2050. rI 0i
1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 * Seattle, WA 98104-1035 • 206.464.7090 • psrc.o packet Pg. 38
What are major priority areas?
7.2.a
VISION 2050 addresses several priority policy topics:
Focus on ,i social equity and access to opportunity in all aspects of the plan.
Plan for how and where I&
regional growtr should occur.
Address housing choice and affordability.
Protect and restore the natural i environment.
Promote 4
thriving Communities and shared prosperity across the region
Support an integrated C4 2�a multimodal transportation network.
Is PSRC studying environmental impacts?
PSRC prepared a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to assess
environmental impacts of the updated regional plan. A Final SEIS is anticipated to be
released in March 2020.
https://www.psrc.org/our-work/regional-planning/vision-2050/environmental-review
Where are we in the process?
Early work 0 Scoping, research, 0 SEPA review, Adoption
planning draft plan
Ways to get involved:
• Visit the VISION 2050 website and read the draft plan at https://www.psrc.org/vision
• Send us an email with questions or comments to vision2050@psrc.org
• Sign up for updates from PSRC at https://www.psrc.org
• Read about what's happening on the PSRC Blog at https://www.psrc.org/whats-happening
PSRC encourages early and continuous involvement in the plan update. There have been many
opportunities to provide input throughout the planning process. See what we've heard so far at
https://www.psrc.org/our-work/regional-planning/vision-2050/public-involvement
0
Packet Pg. 39
7.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/8/2020
Presentation of Preliminary Findings for the Ballinger Regional Facility Feasibility Study
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On October 15, 2019, Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech for a
feasibility report and pre -design services.
Staff Recommendation
For information only.
Narrative
The design team has been progressing on development of the Lake Ballinger Regional Facility and are
ready to present preliminary findings to Council. While the project has had to adapt and change a bit,
it's still looking very promising. The findings indicate that we can, in fact, implement a green
stormwater infrastructure (GSI) project to greatly benefit the City in a number of ways beyond just the
direct stormwater benefits.
We have approached this project a little differently than a typical public works project with a focus on
improving the park and pedestrian experience, but yet it has had to include all of the functionality and
safety elements of a public works project. The team includes arborist, landscape architects, and
engineers all working together early in the planning process in order capture all of the potential the
project has. Also, Parks Department personnel have been brought in early too to ensure we remain
consistent with the visions, plans, obligations, and programming of the park.
Our design team is exceptionally excited about the possibility to bring this project to Edmonds, and we
hope to demonstrate how much potential this project has during our presentation. We have focused
the presentation more on the impacts to the park, but it the project is backed by engineering
calculations and modeling which are not really included in the presentation today. Also omitted from
the focus of this presentation are the pipe re-routing component of the project, as it will required some
upstream pipe changes in order to direct more runoff to the park facility. These elements are included in
the project estimates and scope, but were not include in the presentation in order to honor Council
time.
The project pre -design work also includes a rough plan for funding the project which is still in
development. We believe we can achieve this project with no more than 25% of it being funded by City
funds, but there may be other options to recoup the City portion or bring this percentage down even
more.
Pending Council feedback, next steps for the project would be to submit an initial grant application for
design of the project in October, so that full design could begin mid-2021 or early 2022 depending on
Packet Pg. 40
7.3
budget availability. The current scope also includes some public outreach to be done before the end of
the year in order to help ensure community input is considered.
Attachments:
Presentation
Packet Pg. 41
4tW �a
Alp
ol
Vil
Ti'.S M :�. .+ � s�. T.. ,ter• r'$„� y�
14
.;. IT
IL ,fin -" y _ �* �A c. 4 7a �.:T .. i• .p�,
'd *
r rk r _ ,� ,`.
- � , r - •! ^�F • � � � mow. •{'
*
r
7 '- -•
Q ; `
F
r
7
Q
y
1
+
1
1
1
1
,
f WATERSHED
1
r
r
`-, 140 ACRE BASIN
r
I
I
238th Street SW
'
I
I
I
�
I
1
+' 7
r.
}r�"�'' lama �.•x _�.{;��.�`' '---• �-r-��';:,:�-.,'Tii
'IMF t'
Lake
Ballinger , �•� r f
Park
MATHAY �;W
1 BALLINGER
'� 99 . ,•' w 1 PARK
1
------ 3:.. . . . . . . . . . . . . >
a
Site Cor
a ct
O TETRATECH GROUNDSWELL Lake Ballinger Regional Facility- City of Eds,,,.rrds
NM ro Scak � 4 Aprll tOZO
Packet Pg. 43
•
&M-
• Natural precipitation CU
• Rain events
• Snow melt
• Other surface runoff and drainage
• Travels over land and discharges into
surface water. a
Packet Pg. 44
7.3.a
• Problem: Decrease in quality
• Problem: Increase in quantity U-
• Cause: Developed and disturbed land
• • •FM
L
tM
m
0
r—
}{ei�_ _ 0
Y'' _ R �vi
1r7-.V- WWzr-1'k 4.
r
Pollutants in
stormwater discharges
a
Packet Pg. 46
Typical
pre-develope6,,,_
PRECIPITATION
EVAPO-
TRANSPIRATION _
�-50%
conditions
Source: 2012 Low Impact
Development Techn
Manual for Puget S LPacke
r10 fib
Typical .'.e
developed
PRECIPITATION
EvaPo-
TRANSPIRATION
-25%
Sur a
run I
LL
conditions 0
L
m
CO
4-
0
c
0
c�
a�
N
i
IL
c
0
�w
M �
m
am
a
r
c
t
mm�o
.a
Source: 2012 Low Ir..rac
Develop ' 1 C
Manual fo Packet Pg. 48 d
What are the
benefits of green
stormwater
infrastructure?
• Improve aesthetics
• Protect riparian areas
• Increase property values
• Educate the community
• Reduce infrastructure and
maintenance costs
0
.20
(•
C
0
o
s
CU
U)
CL
s is
Packet Pg. 49
7.3.a
Triple bottom line indicators
EnvironmPntal
• Reduced Flooding
• Enhanced Water Quality
• Enhanced Habitat
• Enhanced Plantlife
• Enhanced Wildlife
• Lower Temperatures
• Enhance Air Quality
Economic
• Workforce Development
• Business Development
M
LL
7i
r_
Social
• Social Cohesion
• Public Safety
• Reduced Crime
0
Health
L
• Increased in Exercise
• Decreases in Heat -related Illness o
• Reduced Stress
• Improved Quality of Life and o
Aesthetics
w
a
:0 401 Packet Pg. 50
w1rammAh flEre
•
Health and
Wellness
Improved health and
wellness through
parks and recreation
'i.
.r 7Y4{fir
Conservation
Protecting open space,
connecting children to
nature, and engaging
communities in
conservation practices
Social Equity
Ensuring all people
have access to the
benefits of local
parks and recreation
7.3.a
Parks, green
stormwater
infrastructure,
and equity
7.3.a
Beautify parks and neighborhoods
• Increase amount and variety c
vegetation
• Introduce alternative material
and orientation for roads and
sidewalks
• Improve pedestrian experienc
U-
0
L
m
0
0
Cn
0
• Encourage exercise A
• Enhance the character of the
community CU
L
ci
r
Packet Pg. 53
7.3.a
Enhance park aesthetics
• Opportunity to create a green
stormwater infrastructure
network that can serve as
enjoyable open space
• Provides community gathering
places to build social cohesion
• Being "green" can be a positive
selling point
• Reduces crime
Packet Pg. 54
I
3 �
Y -
Legend
Basins
System
Lam-
a I
FF
E6p Mceco
.Y
y w Basin 3 ,. r
OA
- �;
' �P 23M P
Lake Ballinger
_ '4
238TH 8
- Basin-2 }
Basin -i
ate r
VA
Basn
' 4 —'1
jl y
r a
',1 =4 I
TETRATECH GROUNDSWELL
7.3.a
mw--•
�y
C
a�
%A
ITr y C
• „ . e: In
a+
Site Aerial - Mathay Ballinger a '1
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Edii—id
Sole: 1'-m 114 AW20
Packet Pg. 56
7.3.a
Prevailing
�. Winds
�I
Canopy
Park �f
Sign L
t
i
E Open
Lawn
Playground 10,
rr'
Basketball
C`tG Court ,' f
Tree
Critical Slope Canopy r Qe
r`
r
r`
r r Prevailing
Winds
' Assumed Park Boundary
Basketball �
Court
s
` Park m Parking Lot
• 3 Standard Stalls
I5ign • 1 ADA Stall
m
ti
Jam- • �_
F • C�
x L
.' O
F
r �
' Tree Protection Zone
Existing Deciduous Tree
Drip Line
Existing Evergreen Tree
Drip Line
3'"mer golsuCA
waxer suislice
Site Ana
.r
a is
O TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL Lake Ballinger Regional Facility- City of Edi,—ids
u.a.�.n..a.�w�.� �.....n.. i.w....
sale: s'-so' 114 AprA MO
Packet Pg. 57
7.3.a
Legend
Tree Protecti
Drip Line of
TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
Tree Protection A
c
m
E
z
a IDS
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Edi i —ids
S"1e=1••tV 114 A012M
Packet Pg. 58
7.3.a
Legend
Tree Protection Zone -1.5x
1
=
Drip Line of Tree
I
U
!
u_
X Tree to be Removed
E
�
o
I
�
�
1
L
1
�
l
�• C
•
/
l
+++ •• O
•
!
i
+! • c
•� ►; O
Playground
�••
•
• +� M
to Remain+•
`.•
•
�C r • •
/•�
22,000 s.f. SURFACE TREATMENT FACILITY �
�'
••
• Removes (5) 12" Trees 2
t��� ++
• ++
• Removes (1) 14" Tree T)
��•
• Removes (2) Sports Courts
r
40
■ X
■
1
! x
■
O
1
e
■
C
1
! X
!
d
4F
!
■
In
L
!
E
■
■
tL
!
! x
■
■
a+
■
■
E
...............
t
c.i
OPTION A - 22,000 s.f. Surface Treatment Fa( 'Icy
�--�
TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
"�1
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility- City of Edi —ids
L N.aK.n,.a ���w� •........ i......
Scale=l"•t0' 114 AQHI 1000
Packet Pg. 59
7.3.a
Legend
Tree Protection Zone -1.5x
1
=
Drip Line of Tree
I
U
1
u_
X Tree to be Removed
E
�
o
I
�
�
1
L
1
�
l
+• C
4'a
1
•��
m
` '•
1
J�++
■
+►� O
Playground i`
++ c
• #•
to Remain10
+• +'
■
*# 40
. `+ a
♦�.
tint s x
+•'
+
c�a � '0 s'
�;t� r�
■
9,500 s.f. SURFACE TREATMENT FACILITY
• Removes (2) 12" Trees 2
I • *�■'
•Removes {1 }Sports Court
ev��;
r
�
1
0
1
1
�
1
d
m
L
r
E
OPTION B - 9,500 s.f. Surface Treatment Fai a :y
�--�
TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
"-1
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility- City of Ed w,ids
L N.aK.n,.��wi........i......
Sole: I"•t0' 1 141pH1 XQO
Packet Pg. 60
� �- .6s ', ' ' .•'�" `�`` .''�• ii,� ma's
.}
i.
lip
lip
,� _- . �-x " - - :�.. _. ;.Ifni?-f'• J'-'�i.p•- 1'.:. .� •'1! t
f -,, _
- - -
" '
41W-
"WAW
se.
„le.
INA m
7.3.a
Arhonst Memo
Groundswell: Mathay Ballinger Park
Appendix A photographs
Rev. July 2, 2020
nn of the site.
Photo 2: S6m of She pmrglas-fir trees along the nnrthwestem houndary of the Park were previously tnppo..d. Phis
has resuhed in cotlominant tops [drded in red] which are less stable than if the original wp was still intacF.
Ina Solutions Inc. Consulting Arhorin"
ICI TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
Arhorist Memo
Groundswell: Mathay Ballinger Park
Phew 3; Lovkkrg southwest along a social *rail that runs thmgh the native tyro grewe.
Tree So Iutlans In[, Conoul ring Arbansts
Rev, July 2, 2020
mkt.
Pagx
Arborist Memorandum -July,
ap
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Edlii—dis
Scala: t--W 114 AW 20Qn
Packet Pg. 63
7.3.a
^-------- ---- ----------- ---.
•■ J.
. r
r
r
•■.lopr
+•� ■ rrr
r
.f r
•." Healthy r'
•.' opTree Canopy rr
r� ,r
40
++• ,ter •t +•r
r • ■■ t r
• a • • +
,rr *` r, tr•r
• • ■•
+•' •� Cherished •.'
+' �r Passive and ,■'
►' r# Active Open +■•
Healthy Space .'•
► Tree Canopy
■ +
■
► rr fr
■ f 1
► 1 1
■ 1 1
■ } 1
■ } 1
■ } 1
■ 1
1 1
1
1 �
-----------------
O TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
Park Use + Tree Diag
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Edii—ids
Sole: V-M 1 14"MO
Packet Pg. 64
7.3.a
TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
Preferred Alterm
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Edi,—ids
Sine; I%M i 1{"MO
Packet Pg. 65
r;- - � �.-rye.- �� y.��t� .. •�= r
. ....�:•.'... :..••• '.try+ ;.
iree.l]rip .��.-
��:;A 49pe' a►1'
Line .:�
`open Lawn
Existing.-Tre�aots1. ; :a •.4. ''
❑pen L
j
the.' � ''e.. '::: =� �,-;.> l`. �2i'K't=c:.�'� -+;:' � • ��` -
7.3.a
Ca5 Pre -filter
Bioretention Baseflow Treatment
COS Prefilter
Missing Survey Information
on Critical Slope
Filterra Bioscape
710 s.f.
Filterra Bioscape ,
710 s.f. .
Filterra Bioscape
710 s.f.
Filterra Bioscape
710 s.f.
Filterra Bioscape
710 s.f.
Filterra
Bioscape
710 s.f.
Filterra
Bioscape
710 s.f.
Filterra- �+ /
Bioscape
710 s.f. l
a
A
48"
SflMli �.
Missing Survn
Information
IT}I TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
To Infiltration
Facility in Park
(not yet sized],
pen
ti Lawn
�1 v
Play roun[f R -
il 4.
Basketball
Court
Basketball
Court
�1
Rainwater Harvesting
L
a�
m
Z
c�
. _ LL
0
L-
egend
- c
C
O
:r
Tree Protection Zone
1.5x Dripline of Existing Tree N
L
■ } Drip Line of Existing Tree
0
— Bioretention Basellow Treatrr
Filterra Bioscape - U'Dou s-I.
c
0
c
d
fA
L
a
Preferred location of storm water facility
w
Preferred Aiterm a le
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Edl....,,ds
smk: x--zn I xa ��a zolo
Packet Pg. 67
i I
7.3.a
TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
y y 'a7FFc. r ?
.��•�.� ...5�.�:'e^���'•.�"nr � ld! +:fbf��� - � - •. � � 4-.��-d`�r [n�4 i'�'.. ....•��^`�t �i'+i+?�. +�+
Preferred Alternative - i a ar
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Ed;,,..,,ds
Packet Pg. 69
7.3.a
TETRA -re- GROUNDSWELL
5tormwater Facility Design - Precedent Im
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of E&—ids
isereen,nar xom
Packet Pg. 70
7-
A
A
Zz
41.
M
CL
01 _tee,_
.2
2
E
Environmental Education Precedent Im
a is
TETRA TECH GROUNDSWELL Lake Ballinger Regional Facility - City of Ed i , ,..,ids
I $4pwmber =0
Packet Pg. 71
7.3.a
Interurban Trail
Great Western Lumber
Great Western Lumber Co- - Lake Ballinger
Shingle Mills
Shingle Mills on the Edmonds Waterfront
�TEYRA TECH GROUNDSWELL
Rails incorported into stormwater facility
_ "
_, . ..
a
Board formed concrete stormwater facility
'Shingles' in the landscape
Rails incorported into stormwater facility
Board formed concrete site features
i�Y re, •.g7nF+� �WI�Ek'l�.
`Shingles' in the landscape
Rails incorported into stormwater facility
Salvaged woad seating at stormwater facility
`Shingles' in the landscape
Historical Narratives - Design Inspira
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility- City of Edirr..,,ds
7 $4pwmber =0
Packet Pg. 72
as ONP. a -
y
_ W
I-- -IN—.
,� _ ; � - �• � Ilk
Rainwater harvesting
Packet Pg. 73
7.3.a
Preliminary Cost Range and Funding
Opportunities
• This is a Preliminary Cost Range based on current information.
• More information will refine the cost estimates as they develop
• Complete Stormwater Facility (assuming Ecology grant)
• Edmonds Portion: $750,000 — $1,250,000
• Ecology Grant: $2,250,000 - $4,750,000
• Total Cost: $3,000,000 to $5,000,000
• Potential Sources of Revenue Include:
• Fee in Lieu from redevelopment along Highway 99 corridor.
Packet Pg. 74
7.3.a
U �..usexrc xQcx�*ccru.c i uQ.x. ecnax i n,a..�xe
Packet Pg. 75
7.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/8/2020
July 2020 Monthly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and move to full council on consent
Narrative
Enclosed is the monthly financial report for the seven months ended July 31, which is 58% of the way
through the year. You will see that the City of Edmonds is weathering the current recession very well.
About 53% of our General Fund revenue comes from two sources, Sales Taxes and Property Taxes. Our
projections show that we will collect approximately 92% of budgeted Sales Taxes by year end, and
virtually all of the budgeted Property Taxes. Sales taxes for the seven months through July are only 5%
behind the budgeted amount.
Other General Fund revenues also remain stable. Locally, home sales are strong and commercial
development remains robust. Some of the economic sectors feeling the biggest negative impacts
nationally include travel and tourism, lodging and entertainment, and oil and gas production and
distribution. Edmonds does not rely heavily on any of these sectors, which is a significant reason why
the City has not been impacted by the national recession to the same extent as many other cities.
Thus far, the careful expense reductions we have made have closed the gap caused by lost revenue
losses. We will continue to monitor and adjust our spending closely. That, coupled with relatively
healthy fund balance reserves, we believe will enable the City to make it through this year in good
financial health.
Attachments:
July 2020 Monthly Financial Report
Packet Pg. 76
I 7.4.a I
OF
EDP
� d
lac. 1 $9v
CITY OF EDMONDS
MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT
J U LY 2020
Packet Pg. 77 1
I 7.4.a I
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
No. Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining %Receive,
001 GENERAL FUND
$ 43,803,858
$ 23,534,511
$ 22,424,193
$ 21,379,665 51
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
437,980
212,500
212,500
225,480 49
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND
012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
111 STREET FUND
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 1
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
136 PARKS TRUST FUND
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND
142 EDMONDS CARES FUND
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 2
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 3
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 3
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
424 BOND RESERVE FUND
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
- - 0
56,140 - 56,140 0
5,230 2,500 2,500 2,730 48
- 280,187 100 (100) 0
165,390
7,997
64,120
101,270
39
r-
O
1,912,768
1,045,042
1,043,886
868,882
55
=
O
2,747,881
1,398,679
1,519,898
1,227,983
55
263,576
40,385
30,433
233,143
12
'U
C
750
438
377
373
50
C
98,630
50,720
37,265
61,365
38
LL
21
27,270
13,069
11,347
15,923
42
t
1,790
329
253
1,537
14
r
O
34,450
16,728
12,874
21,576
37
C
1,436,090
838,132
779,770
656,320
54
Np
N
1,453,520
847,727
774,671
678,849
53
>,
145,050
94,247
44,080
100,970
30
184,610
124,559
91,281
93,329
49
O
6,390
3,653
3,106
3,284
49
0
54,210
34,055
27,524
26,687
51
10,380
6,210
2,712
7,668
26
c�
79,209
63,022
50,999
28,210
64
C
-
-
38,233
(38,233)
0
IL
1,265,100
-
-
1,265,100
0
12,400
30,668
-
12,400
0
r
r-
O
738,400
53,388
47,291
691,109
6
2
0
9,638,306
597,692
1,370,896
8,267,410
14
G
-
82,552
30,870
(30,870)
0
04
11,116,270
5,564,200
5,537,237
5,579,033
50
6,720,466
3,090,910
3,362,834
3,357,632
50
C
25,261,935
7,723,277
7,741,047
17,520,888
31
a)
1=
1,988,100
625,600
616,549
1,371,551
31
tit
to
1,746,160
1,101,456
1,042,540
703,620
60
Q
1,202,963
646,162
704,165
498,798
59
72,620
52,751
54,306
18,314
75
$ 112,687,892 $ 48,183,347 $ 47,679,859 $ 65,008,033 42
1 Differences primarily due to a large traffice impact fee in 2020.
2 Difference primarily due to the Edmonds Waterfront Development Grant received in July of 2020.
3 Differences primarily due to a 4.5%increase in water rate, and a 9.5%increase in storm rate.
1
I Packet Pg. 78 1
I 7.4.a I
Page 1 of l
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 49,044,056
$ 24,687,211
$ 24,352,711
$ 24,691,345
500
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
467,140
246,191
152,182
314,958
3M
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
5,533
-
5,900
00
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
100,000
1,862
-
100,000
00
019
EDMONDSOPI01D RESPONSE FUND
21,555
100,000
-
21,555
00,
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
45,800
-
25,966
19,834
57°
III
STREET FUND
2,199,717
1,155,127
1,288,056
911,661
590
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
2,717,463
579,062
754,649
1,962,814
28°
Q.
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
243,880
20,708
15,394
228,486
6°
4)
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
128,250
38,237
32,558
95,692
250,
U
U
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,880
-
-
26,880
00
C
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
3,000
1,974
450
2,550
1501 IL
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
33,900
10,474
3,509
30,391
100/
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
3,610,520
698,982
873,135
2,737,385
240,
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
3,401,093
651,132
1,029,190
2,371,903
30° 2
0
127
GIFTSCATALOGFUND
113,782
40,403
44,045
69,737
390/ G
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
195,787
114,233
93,211
102,576
480/
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
-
4,935
-
-
00
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
11,900
3,894
11
11,889
00
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
80,510
46,897
34,573
45,937
43° C0.
142
EDMONDS CARES FUND
1,265,100
-
157,111
1,107,989
d
120/
211
L.I.D. FUND CONTROL
12,400
-
-
12,400
00/
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
738,400
53,388
47,291
691,109
60
C
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
13,013,343
104,543
691,684
12,321,659
501 j,L
421
WATER UTILITYFUND
12,809,352
5,237,698
6,248,077
6,561,275
490/ s
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
10,831,951
2,399,379
4,716,272
6,115,679
r
44° C
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITYFUND
32,767,560
6,137,559
6,336,967
26,430,593
19° n
0
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,130
625,592
616,542
1,371,588
310/ G
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
3,170,398
987,949
582,608
2,587,790
180/
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,454,784
530,899
612,976
841,808
420,
617
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
78,700
103,133
51,294
27,406
650/
$ 140,581,251
$ 44,586,992
$ 48,760,462
$ 91,8209790
35° E
r�
a
2
Packet Pg. 79
7.4.a
Pagel of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL
FUND
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
% Received
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 4
$ 10,737,617
$ 5,671,959
$ 5,630,039
$ 5,107,578
520/(
2 EMSPROPERTYTAX
4,112,031
2,192,914
2,198,233
1,913,798
530/(
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
500
123
14
486
30/(
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALES(USE TAX 5
8,450,000
4,772,526
4,450,258
3,999,742
530/(
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
7,600
7,053
4,563
3,037
600/c
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
760,500
451,929
442,273
318,227
580/(
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
1,684,800
1,094,206
1,091,103
593,697
650/(
8 GASUTILITY TAX
579,600
408,935
463,305
116,295
800/(
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
348,800
203,562
211,482
137,318
610/(
10 WATERUTILITYTAX
1,148,400
648,289
593,821
554,579
520/(
11 SEWERUTILITYTAX
896,600
497,359
429,969
466,631
480/(
12 STORMWATER UTILITY TAX
471,900
252,515
276,629
195,271
590/(
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
822,200
466,103
469,410
352,790
570/(
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
823,900
490,940
424,830
399,070
520/(
15 PULLTABSTAX
55,200
43,406
37,754
17,446
680/(
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
40
-
367
(327)
9170/(
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
280,900
139,010
147,475
133,425
5301(
31,180,588
17,340,829
16,871,525
14,309,063
540%
LICENSES AND PERMTIS:
18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
250
60
315
(65)
1260/(
19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING
700
340
80
620
110/(
20 AMUSEMENTS
6,000
4,675
-
6,000
00/c
21 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
50,000
26,203
1,135
48,865
20/(
22 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST
682,200
504,843
511,351
170,849
750/(
23 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
41,000
24,255
23,585
17,415
580/(
24 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -VERIZON/FRONT IER
100,600
49,632
39,115
61,485
390/(
25 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE
358,200
77,912
174,817
183,384
490/(
26 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
116,300
79,053
134,698
(18,398)
1160/(
27 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE
63,700
40,119
39,175
24,525
610/c
28 NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE
64,800
38,100
-
64,800
00/(
29 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
13,500
13,460
-
13,500
00/(
30 BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS
675,600
357,796
468,518
207,082
690/(
31 ANIMAL LICENSES
24,380
8,317
8,572
15,808
350/(
32 STREET AND CURB PERMIT
45,000
26,830
73,892
(28,892)
1640/(
33 OTRNON-BUSLIC/PERMITS
18,500
13,303
10,261
8,239
5501(
2,260,730
1,264,896
1,485,513
775,217
665%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
34 DOI 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
6,000
3,470
2,052
3,949
34°/
35 NCHIP GRANT
-
14,616
-
-
00/(
36 WA ASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT
-
2,285
-
-
0°/
37 TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT
4,000
1,852
-
4,000
00/(
38 DOCKSIE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE
-
2,805
559
(559)
00/(
39 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
7,100
3,501
-
7,100
00/(
40 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY
18,000
-
-
18,000
00/c
41 PUT) PRIVILEDGE TAX
210,500
-
-
210,500
00/(
42 ARCHIVES AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT
-
-
3,829
(3,829)
00/(
43 SCHOOL ZONE
-
-
825
(825)
00/(
44 MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION
13,070
9,316
9,803
3,267
750/(
45 WA91INGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION
-
5,000
-
-
00/(
46 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM DOE
-
7,165
-
-
0°/
47 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
16,740
12,658
8,076
8,664
480/c
48 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
45,600
33,546
35,117
10,483
770/(
49 MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT
500
-
-
500
00/(
50 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
48,300
30,096
32,974
15,327
680/(
51 DUI - CITIES
6,000
4,434
4,448
1,552
740/(
52 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
231,500
167,210
191,593
39,907
830/(
53 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
338,200
170,475
169,254
168,946
5001(
54 MISCELLANEOUS INT ERLOCAL REVENUE
-
2,500
-
-
00/c
55 VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS
-
2,000
-
-
00/(
56 POLICE TRAINING CLASSES
-
211
-
-
00/(
57 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
1,000
814
3,057
(2,057)
3060/(
58 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
550
-
-
550
00/(
947,060
473,953
461,586
485,474
490%
2020 Real Personal/Property Taxes are $(41,920) lower than 2019 revenues
F
O
CL
O
R
C
C
IL
s
C
O
0
N
O
N
A
7
O
Q.
d
.v
C
M
c
IL
z
C
O
n
0
N
O
N
A
r
C
d
E
z
0
M
a
5 2020 Local Retail Sales/Use Taxrevenues are $(322,268) lower than 2019 revenues Please also seepages pages 18 & 19.
3
Packet Pg. 80 1
Title
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
5 D/M COURT REC SER
6 DRE REIMBURSEABLE
7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
8 IT TIME PAY FEE
9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
10 SALE MAPS & BOOKS
11 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS
12 BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
13 PHOTOCOPIES
14 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
15 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
16 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES
17 SNO-ISLE
18 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES
19 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
20 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
21 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
22 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
23 FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FOR DUI
24 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
25 LEGAL SERVICES
26 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
27 BOOKING FEES
28 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
29 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
30 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
31 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS
32 ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER
33 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
34 PLAN CHECKING FEES
35 FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES
36 PLANNING 1 % INSPECTION FEE
37 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
38 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
39 DV COORDINATOR SERVICES
40 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES
41 PROGRAM FEES 6
42 TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES
43 WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES
44 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
45 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
7.4.a
Page 2 of 3
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2020 Amended 7/31/2019 7/31/2020 Amount
Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
$ 3,000 $
2,068 $
2,917
$ 83
970/(
600
311
37
563
60/c
11,000
8,785
4,394
6,606
400
300
74
7
293
20/c
300
43
51
249
170/(
-
-
235
(235)
00/c
11,000
6,962
2,161
8,839
200/(
1,000
822
419
581
420/c
100
216
46
54
460/(
100
41
9
91
90/(
25,100
-
-
25,100
0%
600
-
-
600
00/( 0
CL
1,000
601
394
606
390/( G1
500
-
-
500
00/(
125,000
128,721
174,486
(49,486)
1400/,
1,400
-
-
1,400
0°/ c
85,000
67,692
55,485
29,515
650/( C
21,000
15,605
5,795
15,205
280/( li
30,000
14,141
-
30,000
00/c >4
126,800
39,524
36,753
90,047
290/( t
195,000
163,600
149,144
45,856
760/( C
-
2
38
(38)
00/( G
-
117
-
-
00/c
52,500
43,129
47,791
4,709
CD
910/( N
1,050
1,049
325
725
310/( N
45,000
27,299
23,597
21,403
520/(
3,000
1,878
1,584
1,416
530/(
10,000
9,840
15,098
(5,098)
15101(
3,500
3,819
2,281
1,219
650/(
1,007,500
534,096
504,820
502,680
5001( 0
2,500
629
1,551
949
CL
620/( d
50
100
-
50
00/,
72,600
69,285
51,675
20,925
710/( �s
.v
375,900
353,624
169,371
206,529
450/,
4,000
5,645
13,073
(9,073)
327% M
500
169
-
500
00/( E
5,000
3,850
1,480
3,520
300/( LL
14,000
10,375
10,807
3,193
770/(
4,707
-
-
00/(
15,500
7,058
3,083
12,417
200/( O
869,162
546,625
92,329
776,833
110/( c
1,300
552
-
1,300
00/, cm
5,000
1,655
1,560
3,440
310/( N
800
-
-
800
00/c A
3,290,838
1,533,870
1,683,106
1,607,732
510/( 3
6,418,500
3,608,581
3,055,899
3,362,601
487/,
r
C
d
E
z
tt
to
a
6 2020 Parks & Recreation Program Revenues are $(454,296) lower than 2019 revenues.
4
Packet Pg. 81 1
7.4.a
Page 3 of 3
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2020 Amended 7/31/2019 7/31/2020 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
6 OTHERINFRACTIONS'04
7 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
8 PARK/INDDISZONE
9 DWI PENALTIES
10 DUI - DP ACCT
11 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
12 DUI - DP FEE
13 OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN
14 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
15 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
16 CRIM CONV FEE CT
17 OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
18 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
19 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
20 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
21 CRIM CONV FEE CN
22 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
23 BANK CHARGE FOR CONY. DEFENDANT
24 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
25 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
26 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
NIIS C ELLANEO US :
27 INVESTMENT INTEREST
28 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
29 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
30 SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS
31 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
32 LEASES LONG TERM
33 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
34 PARKSDONATIONS
35 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
36 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
37 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
38 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
39 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
40 OTHERJUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
41 POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION
42 CASHIERS OVERAGES/SHORT AGES
43 OTHER MISC REVENUES
44 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
45 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
46 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
47 FLEX -PLAN SERVICES FORFEITURES
48 NSF FEE - DEVEL SERV DEPT
49 US BANK REBATE
TRANSFERS -IN:
50 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM 511
51 TRANSFER FROM FUND 127
$ 4,000 $
2,383 $
683 $
3,317
17%
241,000
141,240
66,377
174,623
28%
19,000
11,375
7,850
11,150
41%
20,000
10,639
5,784
14,216
29%
1,000
1,371
410
590
41%
2,000
1,120
701
1,299
35%
147,000
86,359
46,015
100,985
31%
2,500
1,470
794
1,706
32%
7,000
5,461
5,713
1,287
82%
700
302
126
574
18%
200
48
34
166
17%
1,500
1,266
1,477
23
98%
140
-
-
140
0%
30,000
19,727
13,320
16,680
44%
3,600
1,731
1,350
2,250
37%
1,000
417
327
673
33%
100
(2,792)
37
63
37%
13,100
12,782
5,639
7,461
43%
600
159
567
33
95%
1,600
634
536
1,064
34%
500
225
82
418
16%
16,000
7,785
4,668
11,332
29%
14,000
8,515
5,225
8,775
37%
6,000
2,816
1,439
4,561
24%
10,100
5,150
-
10,100
0%
300
1,208
-
300
00/0
542,940
321,390
169,153
373,787
31%
399,400
259,134
220,005
179,395
55%
53,440
17,393
9,933
43,507
19%
50,950
5,529
4,908
46,042
10%
153,000
81,913
15,445
137,555
10%
2,100
1,210
380
1,720
18%
205,000
117,706
91,072
113,928
44%
22,500
3,473
910
21,590
4%
3,500
1,350
920
2,580
26%
2,000
820
635
1,365
32%
5,000
7,618
100
4,900
2%
300
68
-
300
0%
3,000
1,558
3,115
(115)
104%
2,000
-
-
2,000
0%
2,000
3
1,344
656
67%
200
399
218
(18)
109%
-
(122)
16
(16)
0%
5,000
7,757
7,667
(2,667)
153%
100
47
23
77
23%
100
30
-
100
0%
150
108
142
8
95%
-
370
-
-
0%
-
-
30
(30)
0%
8,500
5,348
5,754
2,746
68%
918,240
511,712
362,617
555,623
395N.
1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 0%
35,800 13,150 17,900 17,900 500/c
1,535,800 13,150 17,900 1,517,900 1 %
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 43,803,858 $ 23,534,511 $ 22,424,193 $ 21,379,665 51 %
F
O
CL
cC
v
C
M
C
IL
t
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
A
O
Q.
d
C
C
iL
21
s
C
O
n
O
N
O
N
A
0
r
C
d
z
c�
to
a
5
Packet Pg. 82
I 7.4.a I
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 17,066,688
$ 9,227,689
$ 9,655,562
$ 7,411,126
57
2 OVERTIME
491,580
483,137
317,591
173,989
65
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
262,020
8,449
2,031
259,989
1
4 BENEFITS
6,599,678
3,639,538
3,679,920
2,919,758
56
5 UNIFORMS
90,975
72,948
61,094
29,881
67
6 SUPPLIES
428,811
276,203
265,250
163,561
62
7 SMALL EQUIPMENT
161,262
103,934
108,434
52,829
67
8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,407,641
7,650,456
7,249,193
8,158,448
47
9 COMMUNICATIONS
169,795
93,998
86,140
83,655
51
10 TRAVEL
78,580
46,057
5,065
73,515
6
11 EXCISE TAXES
6,500
2,190
7,085
(585)
109
12 RENTAL/LEASE
1,825,110
1,078,321
1,054,994
770,116
58
13 INSURANCE
394,124
436,448
393,746
378
100
14 UTILITIES
531,525
298,317
277,653
253,872
52
15 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
297,010
310,581
346,865
(49,855)
117
16 MISCELLANEOUS
526,991
251,344
239,717
287,274
45
17 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
75,000
75,000
75,000
-
100
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
3,266,993
625,579
449,033
2,817,960
14
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
57,173
-
9,053
48,120
16
20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,000,000
-
1,000,000
0
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
168,850
-
168,850
0
22 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
-
-
500
0
23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
137,250
7,023
69,285
67,965
50
49,044,056
S 24,687,211
S 24,352,711
S 24,691,345
50
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009)
24 BENEFITS
$
206,650
$
86,176
$
94,966
$
111,684
46
25 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
252,990
159,380
51,424
201,566
20
26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
180
5,793
1,207
83
27 MISCELLANEOUS
500
455
-
500
0
467,140
S
246,191
S
152,182
314,958
33
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFr FUND (0 14)
28 SUPPLIES
$
100
$
-
$
$
100
0
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
-
200
0
30 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
5,533
5,600
0
5,900
5,533
S
5,900
0
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSEFUND (018)
31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
100,000
$
1,862
$
$
100,000
0
100,000
1,862
100,000
0
EDMO NDS O PIO ID RES PO NS E FUND (019)
32 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
$
21,555
$
100,000
$
-
$
21,555
0
21,555
100,000
s
21,555
0
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104)
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
45,000
$
-
$
-
$
45,000
0
34 REPAIR/MAINT
800
800
0
35 MISCELLANEOUS
-
25,966
(25,966)
0
45,800
25,966
19,834
57
O
C.
O
C
C
IL
s
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
7
O
C.
c
M
C
iL
t
r
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
r
C
d
1=
z
tt
to
r�
r�
a
6
Packet Pg. 83
I 7.4.a I
Page 2 of 6
Lai Y
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
'Yo Spent
STREEI'FUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 723,081
$ 328,247
$ 380,143
$ 342,938
53'
2 OVERTIME
18,400
33,002
25,889
(7,489)
14P
3 BENEFITS
309,539
155,294
185,729
123,810
60'
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,278
3,781
2,219
63'
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
147,728
115,523
147,477
44'
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
1,416
684
19,316
3'
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
27,930
6,753
1,670
26,260
6'
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
4,156
4,834
(334)
107'
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
0'
10 RENTAL/LEASE
230,450
155,546
133,466
96,984
58'
11 INSURANCE
145,219
156,514
156,937
(11,718)
108'
12 UTILITIES
280,918
145,971
152,183
128,735
54'
13 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
52,000
15,272
48,462
3,538
93'
14 MISCELLANEOUS
13,000
1,662
2,841
10,159
22'
15 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
100,000
-
75,658
24,342
76'
16 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,170
-
-
4,170
0'
17 INTEREST
510
289
255
255
50'
$
2,199,717
$
1,155,127
$
1,288,056
$
911,661
59'
COMBINED STREEI'CONST/Il"ROVE(112)
18 BENEFITS
$
-
$
-
$
1,305
$
(1,305)
0'
19 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
586,130
189,737
118,321
467,809
20'
20 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
163,028
88,777
258,704
(95,676)
159'
21 MISCELLANEOUS
-
-
8
(8)
0'
22 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
40,140
40,318
40,121
19
100'
23 CONST RUCT ION PROJECTS
1,853,975
185,716
262,036
1,591,939
14'
24 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
72,220
72,201
72,201
19
100'
25 INTEREST
1,970
2,313
1,952
18
99'
$
2,717,463
$
579,062
$
754,649
$
1,962,814
28'
MUNIC IPAL ARTS AC Q UIS. FUND (117)
26 SUPPLIES
$
4,700
$
533
$
102
$
4,598
2'
27 SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,700
-
116
1,584
7'
28 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
228,500
17,259
13,714
214,786
6'
29 TRAVEL
80
6
-
80
0'
30 RENTAL/LEASE
2,000
-
-
2,000
0'
31 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
300
-
-
300
0'
32 MISCELLANEOUS
6,600
2,910
1,461
5,139
22'
$
243,880
$
20,708
$
15,394
$
228,486
6-
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
92,487
$
35,654
$
30,058
$
62,429
32'
34 MISCELLANEOUS
6,763
583
500
6,263
7'
35 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
4,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
50'
36 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
25,000
-
-
25,000
0'
$
128,250
$
38,237
$
32,558
$
95,692
25'
EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
37 SUPPLIES
$
1,790
$
-
$
-
$
1,790
0'
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25,090
-
25,090
0'
$
26,880
$
-
$
-
$
26,880
0'
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
39 MISCELLANEOUS
$
3,000
$
1,974
$
450
$
2,550
15'
$
3,000
$
1,974
$
450
$
2,550
15'
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123)
40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
33,900
$
8,515
$
3,509
S
30,391
10'
41 MISCELLANEOUS
-
1,959
-
-
0'
$
33,900
$
10,474
$
3,509
$
30,391
10'
F
O
CL
O
lY
R
C
C
IL
s
C
O
0
N
O
N
O
CL
C
R
C
iL
s
C
O
2
0
N
O
N
r
C
d
E
z
tt
M
r�
a
7
Packet Pg. 84
I 7.4.a I
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ 21,000
$ 37,843
$ 13,815
$ 7,185
66'
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
479,831
101,957
177,373
302,458
37'
3 RENTAL/LEASE
-
381
-
-
0'
4 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
176,176
122,018
283,912
(107,736)
161'
5 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
620
-
-
620
0'
6 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
2,932,893
436,783
398,035
2,534,858
14'
$ 3,610,520
$ 698,982
$ 873,135
$ 2,737,385
24'
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126)
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
8 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
9 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
10 LAND
11 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
12 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
13 INTEREST
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
14 SUPPLIES
15 SMALL EQUIPMENT
16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
17 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
18 MISCELLANEOUS
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
C EM E=Y MAINTENANC UIMPRO VEMENT (130)
20 SALARIES AND WAGES
21 OVERTIME
22 BENEFIT S
23 UNIFORMS
24 SUPPLIES
25 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
26 SMALL EQUIPMENT
27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
28 COMMUNICATIONS
29 TRAVEL
30 RENTAL/LEASE
31 UTILITIES
32 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
33 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TRUSTFUND (136)
34 SMALL EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
35 SUPPLIES
36 TRAVEL
37 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140)
38 SUPPLIES
39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
40 MISCELLANEOUS
EDMONDS CARES FUND (142)
41 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LID FUND CONTROL (211)
42 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
43 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
44 INTEREST
$ 883,267 $
64,023
$ 514,375
368,892
58'
95,963
97,745
211,135
(115,172)
220'
142,736
14,013
12,963
129,774
9'
300,000
-
-
300,000
0'
1,951,937
473,671
289,234
1,662,703
15'
24,220
-
-
24,220
0'
2,970
1,680
1,484
1,486
50'
$ 3,401,093 $
651,132
$ 1,029,190
$ 2,371,903
30'
$ 48,882 $
24,821 $
25,978 $
22,904
53'
-
574
-
-
0'
6,500
-
-
6,500
0'
22,000
1,858
-
22,000
0'
600
-
168
432
28'
35,800
13,150
17,900
17,900
50'
$ 113,782 $
40,403 $
44,045 $
69,737
39'
$ 97,476 $
54,704 $
50,413 $
47,063
52'
3,500
2,873
176
3,324
5'
42,029
24,855
22,119
19,910
53'
1,000
225
-
1,000
0'
7,000
1,083
580
6,420
8'
20,000
10,463
9,478
10,522
47'
-
1,246
-
-
0'
4,200
866
-
4,200
0'
1,700
1,101
980
720
58'
500
-
-
500
0'
8,230
3,652
4,801
3,429
58'
5,652
2,443
2,339
3,313
41'
500
-
-
500
0'
4,000
10,722
2,325
1,675
58'
$ 195,787 $
114,233 $
93,211 $
102,576
48'
$ - $ 4,935 $ - $ - 0'
$ - $ 4,935 $ - $ - 0'
$ 1,500 $ 637 $ 11 $ 1,489 1'
4,500 2,705 - 4,500 0'
5,900 551 - 5,900 0'
$ 11,900 $ 3,894 $ 11 $ 11,889 0'
$ 11,850 $
10,001 $
9,451 $
2,399 80'
66,035
35,946
24,697
41,338 37'
2,625
950
425
2,200 16'
80,510
46,897
34,573
45,937 43'
$ 1,265,100 $ $ 157,111 $ 1,107,989 12'
1,265,100 157,111 1,107,989 12'
$ 12,400 $ $ - $ 12,400 0'
$ 12,400 $ $ - $ 12,400 0'
$ 643,810 $ - $ - $ 643,810 0'
94,590 53,388 47,291 47,299 50'
$ 738,400 $ 53,388 $ 47,291 $ 691,109 6'
O
CL
O
C
C
IL
s
C
O
0
N
O
N
21
O
Q
d
C
C
iL
s
C
O
0
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
E
z
tt
M
Q
8
Packet Pg. 85
I 7.4.a I
Page 4 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended 7/31/2019 7/31/2020 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 323,349 $ 12,915 $ 231,008 $ 92,341 71'
2 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 112,920 - - 112,920 0'
3 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 12,577,074 91,627 460,676 12,116,398 4'
$ 13,013,343 $ 104,543 $ 691,684 $ 12,321,659 5'
WATER FUND (421)
4 SALARIES AND WAGES
5 OVERTIME
6 BENEFIT S
7 UNIFORMS
8 SUPPLIES
9 WAT ER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
10 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
11 SMALL EQUIPMENT
12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13 COMMUNICATIONS
14 TRAVEL
15 EXCISE TAXES
16 RENTAL/LEASE
17 INSURANCE
18 UTILITIES
19 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
20 MISCELLANEOUS
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
22 CONST RUCT ION PROJECTS
23 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
24 REVENUE BONDS
25 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
26 INTEREST
STORMFUND (422)
27 SALARIES AND WAGES
28 OVERTIME
29 BENEFIT S
30 UNIFORMS
31 SUPPLIES
32 SMALL EQUIPMENT
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
34 COMMUNICATIONS
35 TRAVEL
36 EXCISE TAXES
37 RENTAL/LEASE
38 INSURANCE
39 UTILITES
40 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
41 MISCELLANEOUS
42 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
43 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
44 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
45 REVENUE BONDS
46 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
47 INTEREST
$ 845,871 $
464,526
$ 467,789 $
378,082
55'
24,000
14,586
11,187
12,813
47'
363,882
211,555
188,758
175,124
52'
4,000
2,029
2,731
1,269
68'
150,000
41,103
60,726
89,274
40'
2,170,000
973,337
983,278
1,186,722
45'
170,000
42,846
113,257
56,743
67'
11,000
4,856
5,197
5,803
47'
1,753,804
473,752
738,738
1,015,066
42'
30,000
16,519
16,836
13,164
56'
200
-
-
200
0'
1,649,700
896,023
837,751
811,949
5l'
133,158
89,183
76,062
57,096
57'
52,865
55,096
52,541
324
99'
35,775
15,817
16,276
19,499
45'
75,830
30,472
19,090
56,740
25'
131,400
70,594
81,095
50,305
62'
650,870
206,313
204,067
446,803
31'
3,946,207
1,490,076
2,2409953
19705,254
57'
2,800
-
-
2,800
0'
370,960
-
-
370,960
0'
25,840
25,839
25,839
1
100'
211,190
113,174
1059907
105,283
50'
$ 12,809,352 $
5,237,698
$ 6,248,077 $
6,561,275
49'
$ 728,080 $
401,509
$ 353,891
$ 374,189
49'
6,000
29,373
8,878
(2,878)
148'
334,154
205,612
165,611
168,543
50'
6,500
4,872
5,501
999
85'
46,000
17,193
15,921
30,079
35'
4,000
3,653
1,629
2,371
41'
3,047,970
614,542
1,142,888
1,905,082
37'
3,200
3,158
3,709
(509)
116'
4,300
-
-
4,300
0'
470,100
293,022
320,288
149,812
68'
270,830
142,105
158,965
111,865
59'
118,263
127,548
116,576
1,687
99'
11,025
6,922
7,245
3,780
66'
116,183
10,053
13,181
103,002
11'
158,100
94,404
94,241
63,859
60'
282,550
81,819
78,897
203,653
28'
4,758,296
268,563
2,114,507
2,643,789
44'
102,030
-
-
102,030
0'
181,210
-
-
181,210
0'
60,760
32,063
53,576
7,184
88'
122,400
62,969
60,769
61,631
50'
$ 10,831,951 $
2,399,379
$ 4,716,272
$ 6,115,679
44'
F
O
CL
O
C
C
IL
s
C
O
0
N
O
N
O
Q-
C
C
iL
s
c
O
n
0
N
O
N
r
C
d
E
z
tt
M
a
9
Packet Pg. 86
I 7.4.a I
Page 5 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
'% Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 1,953,719
$ 1,027,884
$ 1,120,777
$ 832,942
57'
2 OVERTIME
95,000
56,762
57,910
37,091
61'
3 BENEFITS
854,294
445,565
481,363
372,931
56'
4 UNIFORMS
9,500
5,676
7,039
2,461
74'
5 SUPPLIES
421,000
156,015
201,275
219,725
48'
6 FUEL CONSUMED
60,000
27,413
12,201
47,799
20'
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
4,000
-
-
4,000
0'
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
35,000
8,005
20,161
14,839
58'
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,286,406
649,489
1,429,305
857,102
63'
10 COMMUNICATIONS
43,000
24,194
24,136
18,864
56'
11 TRAVEL
5,000
32
-
5,000
0'
12 EXCISE TAXES
978,000
631,752
538,967
439,033
55'
13 RENTAL/LEASE
311,966
207,219
192,937
119,029
62'
14 INSURANCE
182,121
184,604
174,140
7,981
96'
15 UTILITIES
1,540,685
646,897
544,625
996,060
35'
16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
745,630
231,641
135,168
610,462
18'
17 MISCELLANEOUS
127,650
54,498
51,699
75,951
41'
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
7,197,114
339,196
445,070
6,752,044
6'
19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
-
76,610
(76,610)
0'
20 CONST RUCT ION PROJECTS
15,438,495
1,242,944
629,438
14,809,057
4'
21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
154,660
-
-
154,660
0'
22 REVENUE BONDS
82,840
-
-
82,840
0'
23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
173,210
157,991
158,325
14,885
91'
24 INTEREST
68,270
37,239
33,421
34,849
49'
25 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
-
2,543
2,399
(2,399)
0'
$ 32,767,560
$ 6,137,559
$ 6,336,967
$ 26,430,593
19'
BOND RFSERVEFUND (424)
26 REVENUE BONDS $ 755,020 $ - $ - $ 755,020 0'
27 INTEREST 1,233,110 625,592 616,542 616,568 50'
$ 1,988,130 $ 625,592 $ 616,542 $ 1,371,588 31'
F
O
CL
O
lY
C
C
IL
s
C
O
0
N
O
N
O
Q.
d
w
C
M
C
iL
z
r
C
O
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
t,1
c0
a
10
Packet Pg. 87
I 7.4.a I
Page 6 of 6
CITY OFEDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQ UIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 266,952
$ 151,923
$ 158,781
$ 108,171
59'
2 OVERTIME
2,000
8,081
824
1,176
41'
3 BENEFITS
112,598
65,999
66,096
46,502
59'
4 UNIFORMS
1,000
1,111
828
172
83'
5 SUPPLIES
130,000
67,737
44,425
85,575
34'
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
0'
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
243,000
107,163
79,367
163,633
33'
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
1,892
1,054
56,946
2'
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
1,972
2,577
44,173
6'
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
1,339
1,362
1,638
45'
11 TRAVEL
1,000
255
-
1,000
0'
12 RENTAL/LEASE
12,750
8,004
7,144
5,606
56'
13 INSURANCE
27,848
30,167
40,270
(12,422)
145'
14 UTILITIES
14,500
9,208
9,516
4,984
66'
15 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
60,000
13,456
27,858
32,142
46'
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
9,181
7,754
4,246
65'
17 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
1,500,000
-
-
1,500,000
0'
18 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
678,000
510,461
134,751
543,249
20'
$ 3,170,398
$ 987,949
$ 582,608
$ 2,587,790
18'
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
19 SALARIES AND WAGES
$
369,264
$
176,150
$
165,004
$
204,260
45'
20 OVERTIME
2,000
60
-
2,000
0'
21 BENEFITS
124,590
59,953
55,811
68,779
45'
22 SUPPLIES
5,000
2,914
1,491
3,509
30'
23 SMALL EQUIPMENT
137,700
29,127
59,070
78,630
43'
24 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
309,810
7,909
50,098
259,712
16'
25 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
36,170
40,479
18,291
69'
26 TRAVEL
1,500
359
207
1,293
14'
27 RENTAL/LEASE
7,490
5,550
5,400
2,090
72'
28 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
367,660
153,690
224,196
143,464
61'
29 MISCELLANEOUS
5,000
1,444
11,221
(6,221)
224'
30 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
66,000
57,571
-
66,000
0'
$
1,454,784
$
530,899
$
612,976
$
841,808
42'
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617)
31 BENEFITS
$
23,000
$
10,029
$
12,834
$
10,166
56'
32 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
54,500
93,104
37,452
17,048
69'
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,200
-
1,007
193
84'
$
78,700
$
103,133
$
51,294
$
27,406
65'
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$
140,581,251
$
44,586,992
$ 48,760,462
$
91,820,790
35'
F
O
CL
C
O
C
IL
z
r
C
O
0
N
O
N
21
O
Q.
d
C
O
C
iL
s
r
C
O
0
N
0
N
7
r
C
d
t
t)
c0
a
11
Packet Pg. 88
7.4.a
Page 1 of 1
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDPTURES - GENERAL
FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
$ 418,912
$ 236,230
$ 186,441
$
232,471
45%
OFFICE OF MAYOR
306,685
171,743
196,288
110,397
64%
HUMAN RESOURCES
740,691
309,918
378,306
362,385
51%
MUNICIPAL COURT
1,138,771
571,406
595,161
543,610
52%
CITY CLERK
726,962
419,675
438,669
288,293
60%
FINANCE
1,289,583
758,552
879,925
409,658
68%
C
CITY ATTORNEY
912,540
510,871
503,028
409,512
55%
4)
w
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
15,322,110
7,577,784
7,237,544
8,084,566
47%
POLICE SERVICES
11,951,730
6,779,466
6,748,449
5,203,281
56%
C
ca
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.
761,493
327,582
309,288
452,205
41%
LL
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
3,582,847
1,619,998
1,608,527
1,974,320
45%
2'
t
PARKS& RECREATION
4,594,969
2,296,893
2,047,976
2,546,993
45%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
3,538,610
1,853,142
1,849,822
1,688,788
52%
O
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
3,758,153
1,253,953
1,373,287
2,384,866
37%
N
$ 49,044,056
$ 24,687,211
$ 24,352,711
$
24,691,345
50%
�+
7
O
Q
d
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
.O
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY-
BY FUND
IN SUMMARY
=
C
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
LL
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
2+
s
WATER UTILITY FUND
$ 12,809,352
$ 5,237,698
$ 6,248,077
$
6,561,275
r
O
49%
STORM UTILITY FUND
10,831,951
2,399,379
4,716,272
6,115,679
44%
n
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
32,767,560
6,137,559
6,336,967
26,430,593
o
N
19%
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,988,130
625,592
616,542
1,371,588
>%
31%
$ 58,396,993
$ 14,400,227
$ 17,917,858
$
40,479,135
31%
r
C
d
E
z
tt
to
a
12
Packet Pg. 89
I 7.4.a I
Page I of 4
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Title
2020 Amended
Budget
7/31/2019
Expenditures
7/31/2020
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES
$
191,224
$
104,297
$
110,672
$
80,552
58%
OVERTIME
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
BENEFITS
95,736
56,765
57,333
38,403
60%
SUPPLIES
2,500
1,482
1,502
998
60%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,000
342
-
1,000
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
62,160
54,976
3,377
58,783
5%
COMMUNICATIONS
5,000
3,889
5,094
(94)
102%
TRAVEL
17,500
2,484
587
16,913
3%
RENTAL/LEASE
12,292
7,112
7,184
5,108
58%
REPAIRS✓MAINTENANCE
500
121
645
(145)
129%
MISCELLANEOUS
30,000
4,762
48
29,952
0%
$
418,912
$
236,230
$
186,441
$
232,471
45%
OFFICEOFMAYOR
SALARIES
$
222,432
$
126,361
$
130,749
$
91,683
59%
BENEFITS
54,043
31,163
49,891
4,152
92%
SUPPLIES
1,500
370
660
840
44%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
-
4,199
(4,199)
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,000
1,660
420
2,580
14%
COMMUNICATION
1,400
641
749
651
54%
TRAVEL
3,000
2,513
153
2,847
5%
RENTAL/LEASE
16,860
7,322
9,253
7,607
55%
MISCELLANEOUS
4,450
1,712
213
4,237
5%
$
306,685
$
171,743
$
196,288
$
110,397
64%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES
$
356,658
$
187,403
$
212,172
$
144,486
59%
OVERTIME
-
197
1,619
(1,619)
0%
BENEFITS
142,458
54,041
84,212
58,246
59%
SUPPLIES
18,556
2,256
3,334
15,222
18%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
300
-
893
(593)
298%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
136,471
32,962
28,951
107,520
21%
COMMUNICATIONS
1,550
702
837
713
54%
TRAVEL
1,000
309
500
500
50%
RENTAL/LEASE
31,921
14,420
17,836
14,085
56%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
8,380
7,571
7,832
548
93%
MISCELLANEOUS
43,397
10,055
20,120
23,277
46%
$
740,691
$
309,918
$
378,306
$
362,385
51%
MUNIC IPAL C O URT
SALARIES
$
647,030
$
345,958
$
366,056
$
280,974
57%
OVERTIME
800
1,210
90
710
11%
BENEFITS
223,319
121,931
136,729
86,590
61%
SUPPLIES
10,600
2,285
3,159
7,441
30%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,000
5,155
2,788
(1,788)
279%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124,925
38,398
34,591
90,334
28%
COMMUNICATIONS
3,550
1,723
1,366
2,184
38%
TRAVEL
6,500
2,198
37
6,463
1%
RENTAL/LEASE
67,947
37,415
39,822
28,125
59%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
4,880
277
645
4,235
13%
MISCELLANEOUS
25,100
14,855
9,880
15,220
39%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
23,120
23,120
0%
$
1,138,771
$
571,406
$
595,161
$
543,610
52%
F
O
CL
O
2
U
C
M
C
IL
21
t
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
A
O
C.
<0
C
C
iL
z
r
C
O
n
O
N
O
N
A
7
C
d
1=
z
t)
to
r�
a
13
Packet Pg. 90 1
I 7.4.a I
Page 2 of 4
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 376,214
$ 213,636
$ 238,553
$ 137,661
63%
BENEFITS
156,718
96,679
96,005
60,713
61%
SUPPLIES
10,240
1,944
2,598
7,642
25%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
-
2,451
1,003
(1,003)
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
37,410
13,495
16,459
20,951
44%
COMMUNICATIONS
40,000
20,766
8,364
31,636
21%
TRAVEL
2,000
465
6
1,994
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
63,850
29,481
30,050
33,800
47%
REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
32,530
34,749
41,791
(9,261)
128%
MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
6,009
3,840
4,160
48%
$ 726,962
$ 419,675
$ 438,669
$ 288,293
60%
FINANCE
SALARIES
$
870,882
$
498,088
$
631,257
$
239,625
72%
OVERTIME
4,500
-
-
4,500
0%
BENEFITS
289,923
173,525
164,445
125,478
57%
SUPPLIES
7,350
3,205
2,744
4,606
37%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
2,650
579
-
2,650
0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9,300
359
74
9,226
1%
COMMUNICATIONS
2,000
790
496
1,504
25%
TRAVEL
3,100
2,055
-
3,100
0%
RENTAL/LEASE
50,048
28,819
34,341
15,707
69%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
41,480
42,499
43,963
(2,483)
106%
MISCELLANEOUS
8,350
8,633
2,606
5,744
31%
$
1,289,583
$
758,552
$
879,925
$
409,658
68%
CITY ATPO RNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
912,540
$
510,871
$
503,028
$
409,512
55%
$
912,540
$
510,871
$
503,028
$
409,512
55%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
BENEFITS -UNEMPLOYMENT
50,000
22,812
335
49,665
1%
SUPPLIES
5,000
2,542
3,818
1,182
76%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,009,120
6,349,206
6,146,949
4,862,171
56%
EXCISE TAXES
6,500
2,190
7,085
(585)
109%
RENTAL/LEASE
15,249
7,389
9,320
5,929
61%
INSURANCE
394,124
436,448
393,746
378
100%
MISCELLANEOUS
91,774
49,596
82,974
8,800
90%
CONTRIBUTION TO ECA
75,000
75,000
75,000
-
100%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
3,266,993
625,579
449,033
2,817,960
14%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
168,850
-
-
168,850
0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT
137,250
7,023
69,285
67,965
50%
FISCAL AGENT FEES
500
-
-
500
0%
$
15,322,110
$
7,577,784
$
7,237,544
$
8,084,566
47%
F
O
CL
O
2
U
C
M
C
M
21
t
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
7
O
Q.
Qf
U
C
C
IL
s
r
C
O
n
O
N
O
N
A
7
r
C
d
1=
z
tt
to
r�
r�
a
14
Packet Pg. 91
I 7.4.a I
Page 3 of 4
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
1%SPell t
PO LIC E S ERVIC ES
SALARIES
$ 6,968,887
$ 3,838,745
$ 4,033,337
$ 2,935,550
58%
OVERTIME
461,280
449,423
294,437
166,843
64%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK
262,020
8,449
2,031
259,989
1%
BENEFITS
2,769,042
1,525,316
1,586,095
1,182,947
57%
UNIFORMS
80,750
64,163
44,762
35,988
55%
SUPPLIES
90,500
63,211
55,758
34,742
62%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
127,739
88,629
88,308
39,431
69%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
224,548
125,937
114,724
109,824
51%
COMMUNICATIONS
36,000
25,141
24,850
11,150
69%
TRAVEL
29,310
21,875
2,393
26,917
8%
RENTAL/LEASE
826,124
534,614
477,821
348,303
58%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
15,180
3,990
2,461
12,719
16%
MISCELLANEOUS
60,350
29,975
21,473
38,877
36%
$ 11,951,730
$ 6,779,466
$ 6,748,449
$ 5,203,281
56%
COMMUNITY S ERVIC ES /EC 0 N DEV.
SALARIES
$
357,423
$
152,443
$
182,741
$
174,682
51%
BENEFITS
114,637
48,253
53,193
61,444
46%
SUPPLIES
7,475
6,042
6,826
649
91%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
4,173
-
3,321
852
80%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
214,400
109,516
50,396
164,004
24%
COMMUNICATIONS
2,975
871
1,138
1,837
38%
TRAVEL
2,000
-
1,020
980
51%
RENTAL/LEASE
13,410
6,669
6,877
6,533
51%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
10,500
-
-
10,500
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
9,500
3,788
3,777
5,723
40%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
25,000
25,000
0%
$
761,493
$
327,582
$
309,288
$
452,205
41%
DEVELO PM ENT SERVIC ES/PLANNING
SALARIES
$
1,760,943
$
949,889
$
999,003
$
761,940
57%
OVERTIME
1,300
5,825
13,173
(11,873)
1013%
BENEFITS
658,292
370,439
364,200
294,092
55%
UNIFORMS
500
-
-
500
0%
SUPPLIES
17,100
5,647
4,754
12,346
28%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
7,300
624
1,905
5,395
26%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
886,518
167,914
93,550
792,968
11%
COMMUNICATIONS
9,000
5,448
6,516
2,484
72%
TRAVEL
6,800
8,100
228
6,572
3%
RENTAL/LEASE
170,234
83,574
99,114
71,120
58%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
6,800
596
-
6,800
0%
MISCELLANEOUS
58,060
21,940
26,083
31,977
45%
$
3,582,847
$
1,619,998
$
1,608,527
$
1,974,320
45%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES
$
1,772,804
$
1,009,583
$
1,014,466
$
758,338
57%
OVERTIME
5,000
3,810
2,668
2,332
53%
BENEFITS
701,327
418,483
409,177
292,150
58%
UNIFORMS
450
-
256
194
57%
SUPPLIES
-
32
-
-
0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
2,200
-
868
1,332
39%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
188,840
1,604
1,530
187,310
1%
COMMUNICATIONS
19,600
9,428
9,746
9,854
50%
TRAVEL
600
585
92
508
15%
RENTAL/LEASE
134,995
71,008
77,012
57,983
57%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
2,600
-
458
2,142
18%
MISCELLANEOUS
80,000
44,717
34,816
45,184
44%
$
2,908,416
$
1,559,250
$
1,551,091
$
1,357,325
53%
F
O
CL
2
U
C
M
IL
C
21
t
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
A
7
O
Q.
U
C
C
iL
s
r
C
O
n
O
N
O
N
A
7
r
C
d
1=
z
tt
to
r�
a
15
Packet Pg. 92
I 7Aa I
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2020 Amended
7/31/2019
7/31/2020
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
% Spent
PARKS & REC REATIO N
SALARIES
$ 2,272,394
$ 1,185,093
$ 1,107,408
$ 1,164,986
49%
OVERTIME
10,000
17,114
2,179
7,821
22%
BENEFITS
864,290
461,998
420,958
443,332
49%
UNIFORMS
6,275
4,747
2,722
3,553
43%
SUPPLIES
137,390
84,567
95,331
42,059
69%
SMALL EQUIPMENT
10,900
2,639
4,068
6,832
37%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
620,765
173,523
96,189
524,576
15%
COMMUNICATIONS
31,370
12,491
13,235
18,135
42%
TRAVEL
5,270
4,039
50
5,220
1%
RENTAL/LEASE
268,945
165,807
160,624
108,321
60%
PUBLIC UTILITY
230,507
110,460
88,437
142,070
38%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
29,700
22,555
16,593
13,107
56%
MISCELLANEOUS
98,110
51,860
31,128
66,982
32%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
9,053
9,053
0
100%
$ 4,594,969
$ 2,296,893
$ 2,047,976
$ 2,546,993
45%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SMALL EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
TRAVEL
RENT AL/LEASE
PUBLIC UTILITY
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
MISCELLANEOUS
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES
OVERTIME
BENEFITS
UNIFORMS
SUPPLIES
SMALL EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
TRAVEL
RENT AL/LEASE
PUBLIC UTILITY
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE
MISCELLANEOUS
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$ 380,790 $
171,497 $
174,615 $
206,175
46%
200
339
-
200
0%
131,041
60,993
61,668
69,373
47%
8,600
3,267
2,749
5,851
32%
1,000
857
264
736
26%
200
52
98
102
49%
1,350
419
449
901
33%
500
1,427
-
500
0%
97,295
52,485
56,023
41,272
58%
3,318
1,822
1,907
1,411
57%
1,000
-
-
1,000
0%
4,900
735
959
3,941
20%
$ 630,194 $
293,893 $
298,731 $
331,463
47%
787,257
444,695
454,532
332,725
58%
7,500
5,219
3,423
4,077
46%
348,852
197,139
195,680
153,172
56%
3,000
4,038
13,353
(10,353)
445%
112,000
99,353
82,017
29,983
73%
3,000
2,658
818
2,182
27%
977,444
69,985
158,858
818,586
16%
16,000
11,689
13,301
2,699
83%
1,000
6
-
1,000
0%
55,940
32,206
29,715
26,225
53%
297,700
186,036
187,309
110,391
63%
143,460
198,222
232,478
(89,018)
162%
5,000
2,706
1,802
3,198
36%
1,000,000
-
-
1,000,000
0%
$ 3,758,153 $
1,253,953 $
1,373,287 $
2,384,866
37%
$ 49,044,056 $ 24,687,211 $ 24,352,711 $ 24,691,345 50%
F
O
CL
2
U
c
ca
C
LL
21
t
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
A
7
O
C.
d
<0
C
C
IL
s
r
C
O
z
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
z
c�
to
r�
r�
a
16
Packet Pg. 93
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2020
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 2,268,581 $
2,268,581
$ 2,376,947
4.78%
February
4,691,156
2,422,575
4,730,574
0.84%
March
7,266,925
2,575,769
7,100,593
-2.29%
April
10,693,016
3,426,091
9,435,773
-11.76%
May
19,106,833
8,413,817
17,528,670
-8.26%
June
21,647,958
2,541,125
19,628,003
-9.33%
July
23,877,416
2,229,458
22,424,193
-6.09%
August
26,676,562
2,799,147
September
28,994,637
2,318,075
October
32,807,785
3,813,148
November
41,358,293
8,550,508
December
43,803,858
2,445,565
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2020
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
193,769 $
193,769
$ 323,203
66.80%
February
345,606
151,837
496,485
43.66%
March
547,140
201,534
685,999
25.38%
April
740,550
193,410
857,110
15.74%
May
973,673
233,123
998,087
2.51%
June
1,219,609
245,935
1,240,599
1.72%
July
1,532,815
313,206
1,463,854
-4.50%
August
1,804,669
271,854
September
2,081,138
276,470
October
2,301,037
219,898
November
2,520,239
219,202
December
2,700,000
179,761
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
17
Packet Pg. 94
SALES TAX SUMMARY
I 7.4.a I
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: July 2020
Year -to -Date
Total $4,450,258
Health & Personal Care, Automotive Repair,
$144,313 , $104,085
Construction Trade,
Accommodation, $671,524
$17,105
Clothing and
Accessories, $139,138
Conuminications,
$137,184
Wholesale Trade,
$163,412
Misc Retail, $826,605
Others, $68,966
Amusement &
Recreation, $34,564
Business Services,
$460,599
Gasoline, $20,307
Retail Food Stores,
$186,970
L Retail Automotive,
$939,155
Manufacturing, $56,531
Eating & Drinking,
$479,799
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
10,000,000
8,000,000
7 395 114 $8,406,296 $8,452,715
$6,741,838 $6,905,122
$5,840,764
6,000,000
$4,450,258
4,000,000
2,000, 000
0
201 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD 2020
18
I Packet Pg. 95
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2020
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 634,902 $
634,902
$ 692,248
9.03%
February
1,436,667
801,765
1,539,597
7.16%
March
2,031,860
595,193
2,187,876
7.68%
April
2,597,573
565,713
2,691,601
3.62%
May
3,324,621
727,048
3,191,797
-4.00%
June
3,990,697
666,076
3,761,924
-5.73%
July
4,697,452
706,756
4,450,258
-5.26%
August
5,482,731
785,279
September
6,213,489
730,757
October
6,961,050
747,562
November
7,750,015
788,965
December
8,450,000
699,985
Gas Utility Tax
Sales and Use Tax
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000 /
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 81,408 $
81,408
$ 82,496
1.34%
February
168,408
87,000
177,747
5.55%
March
245,012
76,604
260,308
6.24%
April
308,737
63,725
337,848
9.43%
May
358,094
49,357
395,193
10.36%
June
392,813
34,720
430,775
9.66%
July
419,421
26,607
463,305
10.46%
August
441,879
22,458
September
462,623
20,744
October
486,497
23,874
November
524,782
38,285
December
579,600
54,818
Gas Utility Tax
600,000
500,000
400,000 -
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget Prior Yeaz
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
a+
Q
19
Packet Pg. 96
I 7Aa I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax
2020
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 79,271 $
79,271
$ 70,129
-11.53%
February
154,920
75,649
134,128
-13.42%
March
224,811
69,891
191,257
-14.93%
April
298,919
74,108
254,236
-14.95%
May
365,795
66,876
309,632
-15.35%
June
433,375
67,580
361,422
-16.60%
July
497,866
64,491
424,830
-14.67%
August
563,527
65,661
September
631,163
67,636
October
697,753
66,590
November
761,530
63,777
December
823,900
62,370
Electric Utility Tax
1,000,000
Telephone Utility Tax
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
OF
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000 ir
0
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax
2020
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 176,332
$ 176,332
$ 179,486
1.79%
February
369,755
193,422
371,370
0.44%
March
530,960
161,206
535,467
0.85%
April
710,778
179,818
710,200
-0.08%
May
852,710
141,933
854,417
0.20%
June
974,520
121,810
970,402
-0.42%
July
1,088,754
114,233
1,091,103
0.22%
August
1,199,457
110,703
September
1,311,314
111,857
October
1,428,233
116,919
November
1,552,157
123,924
December
1,684,800
132,643
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
20
Packet Pg. 97
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2020
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
804,719 $
804,719
$ 737,298
-8.38%
February
1,363,439
558,720
1,256,012
-7.88 /
March
2,170,455
807,015
2,048,593
-5.61%
April
2,696,703
526,248
2,538,466
-5.87/,
May
3,481,516
784,813
3,275,201
-5.93/,
June
4,099,586
618,070
3,855,044
-5.97%
July
5,087,366
987,780
4,682,817
-7.95 /
August
5,941,343
853,977
September
7,092,152
1,150,809
October
7,892,798
800,646
November
8,818,044
925,246
December
9,384,958
566,914
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2020
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
355,919 $
355,919
$ 348,012
1.79%
February
1,125,592
769,673
1,101,727
0.44%
March
1,480,771
355,179
1,449,754
0.85%
April
1,795,425
314,654
1,758,968
-0.08%
May
2,150,929
355,505
2,107,634
0.20%
June
2,466,536
315,606
2,417,745
-0.42%
July
2,822,237
355,701
2,766,634
-1.97%
August
3,592,736
770,499
September
3,947,537
354,801
October
4,262,734
315,197
November
4,618,388
355,654
December
4,921,433
303,045
Storm Water Sales
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--6-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
ZZ
Packet Pg. 98
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2020
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 843,972 $
843,972
$ 792,168
-6.14%
February
1,528,418
684,445
1,457,427
-4.64%
March
2,368,523
840,105
2,253,756
-4.85%
April
3,057,434
688,911
2,905,227
-4.98%
May
3,904,796
847,362
3,666,165
-6.11%
June
4,601,743
696,947
4,301,071
-6.53%
July
5,475,901
874,158
5,076,023
-7.30%
August
6,170,772
694,871
September
7,057,714
886,942
October
7,759,947
702,233
November
8,620,364
860,417
December
9,307,969
687,605
Unmeter Sewer Sales
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000 —
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
CL
O
U
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
C4
O
N
7
O
O
U
C
M
C
IL
z
r
C
O
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
E
t
0
M
++
a
22
Packet Pg. 99
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2020
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
5,642,749 $
5,642,749
$ 3,641,481
-35.47%
February
8,910,266
3,267,517
7,564,087
-1S.11%
March
12,507,763
3,597,497
10,796,906
-13.68%
April
16,723,319
4,215,556
13,318,642
-20.36%
May
19,875,327
3,152,008
17,123,820
-13.84%
June
24,725,220
4,849,893
21,049,664
-14.87%
July
28,663,754
3,938,534
24,352,711
-15.04%
August
32,968,461
4,304,707
September
36,464,588
3,496,127
October
40,092,243
3,627,655
November
44,563,572
4,471,329
December
49,044,056
4,480,484
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2020
Non -Departmental
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
2,923,229 $
2,923,229
$ 1,280,852
-56.18%
February
3,405,897
482,668
2,717,261
-20.22%
March
4,567,146
1,161,249
3,569,389
-21.85%
April
6,398,890
1,831,744
3,731,670
-41.68%
May
6,709,824
310,934
5,129,301
-23.56%
June
8,510,257
1,800,433
6,488,886
-23.75%
July
9,528,179
1,017,922
7,237,544
-24.04%
August
10,974,933
1,446,754
September
11,879,864
904,931
October
12,546,369
666,505
November
14,100,020
1,553,651
December
15,322,110
1,222,090
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
C
LL
t
r.+
C
O
O
N
O
N
21
7
7
r
C
d
t
C�
a
23
Packet Pg. 100
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2020
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
26,361 $
26,361 $
23,825
-9.62%
February
54,130
27,769
55,625
2.76%
March
88,475
34,345
81,971
-7.35%
April
119,273
30,799
106,847
-10.42%
May
158,791
39,518
133,074
-16.20%
June
205,911
47,121
160,080
-22.26%
July
239,007
33,095
186,441
-21.99%
August
285,476
46,469
September
323,555
38,079
October
346,924
23,369
November
382,373
35,449
December
418,912
36,539
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2020
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
25,001 $
25,001 $
28,750
15.00%
February
50,898
25,897
60,151
18.18%
March
76,062
25,164
87,486
15.02%
April
101,769
25,706
114,642
12.65%
May
126,945
25,177
142,030
11.88%
June
151,749
24,804
169,276
11.55%
July
177,563
25,814
196,288
10.55%
August
203,939
26,376
September
229,480
25,541
October
254,419
24,939
November
279,429
25,010
December
306,685
27,256
Office of Mayor
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget - -Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
iZ
U
C
M
C
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
tV
O
N
21
O
CL
CD
U
C
c
LL
t
r
C
O
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
!v
t
t�
a
24
Packet Pg. 101
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2020
Human Resources
Cumulative
Budget Forecast
Monthly
Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 59,451
$ 59,451
$ 68,346
14.96%
February
117,267
57,816
134,278
14.51%
March
178,196
60,929
184,385
3.47%
April
229,767
51,571
233,118
1.46%
May
284,932
55,165
283,462
-0.52%
June
355,895
70,963
335,262
-5.80%
July
411,216
55,322
378,306
-8.00%
August
469,554
58,338
September
531,309
61,755
October
590,790
59,481
November
649,771
58,981
December
740,691
90,920
Municipal Court
Human Resources
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Yeaz Budget Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 86,636 $
86,636
$ 79,231
-8.55%
February
180,238
93,602
166,073
-7.86%
March
272,302
92,065
249,701
-8.30%
April
365,299
92,996
331,047
-9.38%
May
465,516
100,217
422,932
-9.15%
June
553,704
88,188
507,527
-8.34%
July
646,093
92,389
595,161
-7.88%
August
743,853
97,760
September
834,912
91,059
October
934,920
100,009
November
1,028,111
93,191
December
1,138,771
110,660
Municipal Court
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0---CurrentYeaz Budget �PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
C.
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
M
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
C,1
a
25
Packet Pg. 102
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2020
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
City Clerk
49,169 $
106,160
165,380
227,893
286,048
342,978
404,684
472,943
532,197
597,110
667,285
761,493
49,169 $
56,991
59,220
62,513
58,155
56,930
61,706
68,259
59,254
64,914
70,174
94,208
40,001-18.65%
82,357-22.42%
123,069-25.58%
165,175-27.52%
210,066-26.56%
258,279-24.70%
309,288-23.57%
Community Services/Economic Development
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-0- Current Year Budget Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 71,401 $
71,401
$ 83,447
16.87%
February
129,624
58,223
139,339
7.49%
March
187,005
57,380
199,113
6.47%
April
251,043
64,039
258,617
3.02%
May
306,774
55,730
321,093
4.67%
June
361,810
55,036
378,904
4.72%
July
423,597
61,787
438,669
3.56%
August
486,276
62,679
September
539,284
53,008
October
597,946
58,662
November
662,981
65,035
December
726,962
63,981
City Clerk
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
21
O
CL
CD
C
c
LL
21
t
r
C
O
O
N
O
N
7
7
r
C
d
1=
t
t�
a
26
Packet Pg. 103
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Technology Rental Fund
2020
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
177,914 $
177,914 $
81,888
-53.97%
February
334,463
156,549
291,582
-12.82%
March
444,630
110,167
352,886
-20.63%
April
528,740
84,111
396,588
-24.99%
May
626,604
97,864
462,422
-26.20%
June
728,444
101,840
540,328
-25.82%
July
813,042
84,598
612,976
-24.61%
August
911,499
98,456
September
1,028,310
116,812
October
1,126,888
98,577
November
1,231,196
104,309
December
1,454,784
223,588
Finance
Technology Rental Fund
1,500,000
1,200,000
900,000
600,000
300,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Finance
2020
Cumulative
Monthly
YTD
Variance
Budget Forecast
Budget Forecast
Actuals
%
January
$ 124,756
$ 124,756
$ 148,549
19.07%
February
235,691
110,935
251,089
6.53%
March
337,197
101,506
353,610
4.87%
April
438,143
100,947
456,877
4.28%
May
539,685
101,542
562,662
4.26%
June
639,437
99,752
795,796
24.45%
July
7S0,562
111,125
879,925
17.24%
August
854,084
103,522
September
970,025
115,941
October
1,081,072
111,048
November
1,184,488
103,415
December
1,289,583
105,095
Finance
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
27
Packet Pg. 104
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2020
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 76,045 $
76,045
$ 49,883
-34.40%
February
1S2,090
76,045
142,611
-6.23%
March
228,135
76,045
192,534
-1S.61%
April
304,180
76,045
288,462
-5.17%
May
380,225
76,045
359,660
-5.41%
June
456,270
76,045
431,895
-5.34%
July
532,315
76,045
503,028
-5.50%
August
608,360
76,045
September
684,405
76,045
October
760,450
76,045
November
836,495
76,045
December
912,540
76,045
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2020
Police
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 940,461 $
940,461
$ 887,236
-5.66%
February
1,891,364
950,903
1,893,712
0.12%
March
2,844,400
953,036
2,821,483
-0.81%
April
3,808,566
964,166
3,703,720
-2.75%
May
4,764,870
956,304
4,601,807
-3.42%
June
5,757,552
992,683
5,628,905
-2.23%
July
6,727,081
969,529
6,748,449
0.32%
August
7,664,129
937,048
September
8,620,478
956,349
October
9,688,901
1,068,423
November
10,939,777
1,250,876
December
11,951,730
1,011,953
Police
12,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--ft- Current Year Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
C.
U
C
M
C_
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
U
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
O
N
O
N
2+
7
7
r
C
d
t
t�
a
Z$
Packet Pg. 105
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2020
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 249,933 $
249,933
$ 241,446
-3.40%
February
530,487
280,S53
461,847
-12.94%
March
820,192
289,705
685,780
-16.39%
April
1,114,858
294,666
922,412
-17.26%
May
1,418,144
303,286
1,151,071
-18.83%
June
1,697,166
279,021
1,370,746
-19.23%
July
1,991,793
294,627
1,608,527
-19.24%
August
2,295,145
303,352
September
2,593,333
298,188
October
2,899,612
306,279
November
3,239,495
339,883
December
3,582,847
343,352
Parks & Recreation
Development Services
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--*-- Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of'Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2020
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 310,663 $
310,663
$ 278,296
-10.42%
February
633,218
322,555
596,263
-5.84%
March
976,069
342,851
892,745
-8.54%
April
1,332,232
356,164
1,186,533
-10.94%
May
1,699,847
367,615
1,472,976
-13.35%
June
2,069,338
369,491
1,756,039
-15.14%
July
2,534,539
465,201
2,047,976
-19.20%
August
3,070,105
535,567
September
3,504,600
434,495
October
3,876,641
372,041
November
4,200,535
323,894
December
4,594,969
394,434
Parks & Recreation
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
F
O
CL
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
2
O
N
O
N
21
O
C.
O
C
C
LL
t
r
C
O
O
N
O
N
7
r
C
d
1=
t
C�
a
29
Packet Pg. 106
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works Administration
2020
Public Works Administration
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 51,939 $
51,939
$ 41,796
-19.53%
February
105,536
53,597
83,385
-20.99%
March
157,916
52,379
125,953
-20.24%
April
210,278
52,362
169,511
-19.39%
May
262,800
52,522
212,944
-18.97%
June
316,459
53,659
256,932
-18.81%
July
370,954
54,495
298,731
-19.47%
August
422,825
51,871
September
472,902
50,077
October
524,167
51,265
November
575,881
51,714
December
630,194
54,313
Facilities Maintenance
Public Works Administration
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2020
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
284,728 $
284,728
$ 177,532
-37.65%
February
585,426
300,698
353,835
-39.56%
March
887,362
301,936
583,052
-34.29%
April
1,181,106
293,744
781,557
-33.83%
May
1,483,561
302,454
1,002,638
-32.42%
June
1,740,520
256,959
1,175,527
-32.46%
July
2,069,330
328,810
1,373,287
-33.64%
August
2,371,409
302,079
September
2,707,430
336,020
October
3,011,628
304,199
November
3,381,203
369,574
December
3,758,153
376,950
Facilities Maintenance
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
30
Packet Pg. 107
I 7.4.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2020
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 219,750 $
219,750
$ 212,290
-3.39%
February
436,542
216,792
426,262
-2.35%
March
671,678
235,136
646,635
-3.73%
April
915,104
243,427
868,452
-5.10%
May
1,155,255
240,151
1,118,106
-3.22%
June
1,402,970
247,715
1,335,611
-4.80%
July
1,656,398
253,428
1,551,091
-6.36%
August
1,917,510
261,112
September
2,156,951
239,441
October
2,402,446
245,495
November
2,635,839
233,393
December
2,908,416
272,577
Engine a ring
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
31
Packet Pg. 108
I 7.4.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
As of
July 31, 2020
Years
Agency/
Investment
Purchase
to
Par
Market
Maturity
Coupon
Issuer
Type
Price
Maturity
Value
Value
Date
Rate
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
4,014,120
0.42
4,000,000
4,016,800
01/01/21
1.47%
First Financial
CD
3,000,000
0.69
3,000,000
3,000,000
04/10/21
2.86%
Port of Seattle WA
Bonds
273,305
0.75
270,000
270,810
05/01/21
2.23%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
410,553
1.42
405,000
412,472
01/01/22
1.79%
FFCB
Bonds
1,998,548
1.87
2,000,000
2,062,424
06/14/22
1.88%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
1,466,077
1.92
1,345,000
1,468,350
07/01/22
5.00%
Energy Northwest
Bonds
260,748
1.92
250,000
261,048
07/01/22
2.95%
Mason & Kitsap Cnty WA
Bonds
948,084
2.34
855,000
951,384
12/01/22
5.00%
FHLB
Bonds
3,000,000
2.42
3,000,000
3,019,866
12/30/22
1.79%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
1,517,955
2.42
1,500,000
1,536,675
01/01/23
1.54%
Grant Cnty WA
Bonds
576,332
2.42
520,000
579,363
01/01/23
5.00%
Seattle WA Muni
Bonds
2,224,500
2.51
2,000,000
2,240,400
02/01/23
5.00%
First Financial
CD
2,803,516
3.29
2,803,516
2,803,516
11/15/23
2.10%
Kent WA
Bonds
286,648
3.34
250,000
289,583
12/01/23
5.00%
Spokane County WA
Bonds
259,075
4.34
250,000
264,015
12/01/24
2.10%
First Financial
CD
2,000,000
7.26
2,000,000
2,000,000
11/01/27
1.68%
TOTAL SECURITIES
25,039,459
2.46
24,448,516
25,176,706
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 25,949,324 25,949,324 Demand 0.31%
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool 13,075,443 13,075,443 Demand 1.81%
TOTAL PORTFOLIO $ 63,473,284 $ 64,201,473
Issuer Diversification
Energy
Northwest,
7%
FHLB, 12%
First
Financial -
Spokane
CD, 32%
County
WA, 1%
Checki ng, Cash and Investment Balances
$1.8 , 3%—� (in $ Millions)
Bonds,
$16.6, 25%
State LGIP,
$25.9, 40%
Ws, $7.8,
12% County
LGIP,
32
Packet Pg. 109 1
■ 7.4.a
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000 917 754
$800,000 $653,690 All
8
$600,000
335 926 $423,816
$400,000
$200,000
$- 1
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD 2020
Edmonds Rate of Return Compared to Benchmark (Rolling 12 months)
— - - 6 Month Treasury Rate (Benchmark) City Blended Rate
L
•�. -
- - -
st October December February April June
$ 7,000, 000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000, 000
Maturity Distribution and Rate of Return
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
0-6 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 42-48 48-54 54-60 60-66 66-72 72-78 78-84 84-90 90-96
Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo
33
Packet Pg. 110 1
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
I 7.4.a I
GENERAL FUND
& SUBFUNDS
001-General Fund
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
012-Contingency Reserve Fund
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
016-Building Maintenance
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
018 -Edmonds Homelessness Response
019 - Edmonds Opioid Response
Total General Fund & Subfunds
FUND BALANCES
Iy:/_1►lei a1►1all .1.1 1_1WG101[a]
---- ACTUAL ----
Q2 YTD
2,274,651 $ (1,928,511 o
149,688 60,311
2,500 2,501 U_
- - c
M
0 10(
(0) - c
0
2,426,839 $ (1,865,591 N
0
N
3
*$2,000,000 of the General Fund Balance has been assigned by management for the development of Civic Field.
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019
6/30/2020
7/31 /2020
$ 15,552,187
$ 14,130,526
$ 13,623,670
$
355,874
416,192
416,192
1,782,149
1,782,149
1,782,149
12,187
14,687
14,687
210,221
210,221
210,221
864,491
864,491
864,591
223,581
223,581
223,581
50,000
50,000
50,000
$ 19,050,690
$ 17,691,847
$ 17,185,091
$
V_
*$7,720,000 of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,782,149 balance in Fund 012, represent the required 0.
0
20% operating reserve. rr
General Fund & Subfunds
U
c
21
-
u_
21
18
General Fund
o
15
$9 33
& Subfunds
Z
$7.97 $7.47
c
12
General Fund
c
c
Operating Reserve
N,
= 9
■ Civic Field
6
$7.72 $7.72 $7.72
3
c
E
$ 2.00 2.00 $2.00
U
2
r
Dec 2019 June 2020 July 2020 Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
34
Packet Pg. 111
7.4.a
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
CHANGE IN FUND
FUND BALANCES
BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
FUNDS
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 6/30/2020 7/31 /2020
Q2 YTD
General Fund & Subfunds
$ 19,050,690 $ 17,691,847 $ 17,185,091
$ 2,426,839 $ (1,865,59E
Special Revenue
10,622,237 10,896,734 10,803,209
(717,997) 180,971
Debt Service
- (0) (0)
(0) (C
0
Capital Projects
6,443,150 6,362,622 7,122,362
(297,831) 679,212
C
Total Governmental Funds
$ 36,116,078 $ 34,951,202 $ 35,110,662
$ 1,411,010 $ (1,005,41E
c
c
ii
21
t
c
0
2
Governmental Fund Balances -By Fund Group Governmental Fund Balances -
0
N
0
Combined
N
21 40
v
1r
__W.05 $36.12
34.95 $35.11
0
=
18 35
$17.19+General
Fund & 30
15 Subfunds
c
--a—Special 25
jL
12 Revenue c
>+
o -_
$10.80 2 20
c
9 Debt
Service 15
N
$7.12
0
666.44
N
--*--Capital 10
2+
Projects
3 5
m
E
_
_ $_
z
v
Dec 2019 June 2020 July 2020 Dec 2019 June 2020 July 2020
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
35
Packet Pg. 112
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
I 7.4.a I
GOVERNMENTAL
SPECIAL REVENUE
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
111 - Street Fund
112 - Combined Street Const/Improve
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
118 - Memorial Street Tree
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund
123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
125 -Real Estate Tax 2
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
136 - Parks Trust Fund
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
138 - Sister City Commission
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing Fd
142 - Edmonds Cares Fund
Total Special Revenue
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
$ 39,839
$ 77,411
$ 77,994
1,298,473
1,088,447
1,054,303
1,421,769
2,197,489
2,187,019
634,011
647,244
649,051
19,785
20,012
20,162
93,013
96,191
97,720
86,844
96,987
98,191
13,600
13,303
13,403
72,101
80,804
81,467
2,625,364
2,507,321
2,532,000
2,486,325
2,177,940
2,231,805
332,255
337,990
332,290
260,685
255,125
258,755
163,071
164,942
166,177
1,053,314
1,070,881
1,080,838
10,129
12,734
12,829
11,546
19,465
27,972
112
32,446
38,345
-
-
(157,111)
$ 10,622,237
$ 10,896,734
$ 10,803,209
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE:
ACTUAL
(25,601) $
29,704
(312,999)
10,482
84
(10,753)
1,459
228
2,638
(176,642)
(248,934)
(13,300)
10,920
692
7,714
2,543
(8,897)
13,663
$ (716,997) $
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 125 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding
Special Revenue Funds
12
10
g
H
0 6 Special
$10.62 $10.90 $10.80 Revenu
4
2
Dec 2019 June 2020 July 2020
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
38,15Z
(244,17C
765,24E
15,03�
377 �.
4,707 0
11,347 m
(197
9,36E
(93,364
(254,52C
LL
3E
(1,93C
3,10E 0
27,524 c
2,701 c
16,42E N
38,23: 3
(157,111
180,971 0
Q.
m
U
c
ii
c
t
c
0
0
N
0
N
7
e
m
E
t
v
2
r
Q
36
Packet Pg. 113
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
I 7.4.a I
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
421
-Water Utility Fund
422
- Storm Utility Fund
423
- Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund
424
- Bond Reserve Fund
411
-Combined Utility Operation
Total Enterprise Funds
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019
6/30/2020
7/31 /2020
$ 23,049,550
$ 22,708,684 $
22,338,711
$
12,607,151
11,522,128
11,253,713
46,572,051
47,580,092
47,976,131
843,961
843,968
843,969
-
30,710
30,870
$ 83,072,713
$ 82,685,581 $
82,443,393
$
CHANGE IN FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
(1,345,060) $
(1,062,525)
119,207
3
830
(2,287,545) $
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding
50,000,000
45,000,000
40,000,000
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000, 000
0
Enterprise and Agency Fund Balances as of July 31, 2020
Combined Utility Water Storm
13
(710,83�
(1,353,43E
1,404,08C
f
30,87C 0
(629,32C
v
c
c
ii
21
z
c
O
0
N
0
N
,
3
7
0
d
R
c
c
li
— c
O
0
N
0
- _ N
$843,969 $149,745 >,
7
Sewer/WWTP Bond Reserve Firemen's Pension
Fund
d
E
t
t,1
to
$47,976,131
a
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
37
Packet Pg. 114
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
I 7.4.a I
FUND BALANCES
CITY-WIDE
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 6/30/2020 7/31 /2020
Governmental Funds
$ 36,116,077 $ 34,951,202 $ 35,110,662
$
Enterprise Funds
83,072,713 82,685,581 82,443,393
Internal Services Fund
10,803,067 11,259,633 11,354,188
Agency Funds
146,733 154,816 149,745
Total City-wide Total
$130,138,590 $129,051,233 $129,057,988
1 $
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
Q2 YTD
1,411,010 $ (1,005,41 E
(2,287,545) (629,32C
351,283 551,121 0
m
31,100 3,012 W
(494,151) $ (1,080,601 .0
c
c
ii
21
t
— c
Governmental Fund Balances (Excluding General Fund) as of July 31, 2020 Z
Drug Enforcement Fund
Street Fund
Combined Street Const/Improve Fund
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
Memorial Street Fund
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
Employee Parking Permit Fund
Youth Scholarship Fund
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
Real Estate Excise Tax 2
Real Estate Excise Tax 1
Gifts Catalog Fund
Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
Parks Trust Fund
Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
Sister City Commission
Business Improvement District
Parks Capital Construction Fund
$- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,00C
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
0
N
O
N
1=
O
m
R
v
c
c
LL
t
c
O
0
N
0
N
7
r
c
d
E
t
U
cv
r
Q
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
38
Packet Pg. 115 1
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
I 7.4.a I
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
512 -Technology Rental Fund
Total Internal Service Funds
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000, 000
6,000, 000
4,000, 000
2,000, 000
K:$786,798
Dec 2019
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
12/31 /2019 6/30/2020 7/31 /2020
$ 10,016,269 $ 10,412,411 $ 10,476,201 $
786,798 847,223 877,987
$ 10,803,067 $ 11,259,633 $ 11,354,188 1 $
Internal Service Fund Balances
$10,412,411
ql$847,223
June 2020
$10,476,201
$877,987
July 2020
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
Q2 YTD
238,867 $ 459,932
112,417 91,18�
to
Q.
351,283 $ 551,121
2
U
c
c
ii
21
t
c
0
0
N
0
N
1`
0
Q.
m
U
c
c
■ 511- Equipment Rental Fund
M
21
■512- Technology Rental Fund
M,
c
0
0
N
0
N
,
7
c
m
E
t
v
r
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2019 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the audited 2019 Financial Statements.
39
r
Q
Packet Pg. 116 1
7.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/8/2020
Amendment of Edmonds Cares Fund Ordinance
Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty
Department: Community Services
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
Since implementation by the Administration of the Community and Economic Relief Program, with
subsequent approval by City Council of the Edmonds Cares Fund (Ordinance 4189), three human -
services agencies have been working on behalf of, and in collaboration with, the City to disburse grants
of up to $1,000 for 1- and 2-member households and $1,500 grants to households of 3 or members,
pursuant to the $450,000 Housing and Supplementary Relief program.
To date 135 households and/or individuals have been offered grants, totaling $156,906.
When approved by City Council, the Edmonds Cares Fund did not contemplate awarding more than one
grant per individual or household. Nevertheless, the need on the part of these Edmonds residents in
most cases has not abated. A grant of $1,000 or $1,500 in, say, July has not necessarily provided enough
stability that those individuals or households might be without continuing need now in September and
beyond.
What's more, even with extensive public outreach to publicize the availability of these grants, the
numbers of new applicants have begun to decrease over previous months.
Staff Recommendation
Forward Ordinance for approval to Consent Agenda of 9/15/20 City Council meeting.
Narrative
For these reasons, the Administration proposes amending the Edmonds Cares Fund Ordinance
(Ordinance 4189) to allow for disbursement of more than one grant per individual or household based
on an analysis of continuing need and/or consideration of other, new applicants. Representatives of the
social services organizations under contract with the City will be in attendance at the City Council
meeting on 9/8/20.
Attached is a proposed Ordinance that amends Ordinance 4189. The original Ordinance is also attached
for reference.
Attachments:
2020-09-03 Ordinance amending Edmonds Cares Fund Ordinance
Final Edmonds Cares Fund Ordinance 4189
Packet Pg. 117
7.5.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND
AMENDING ORDINANCE 4189, EDMONDS CARES
FUND
WHEREAS, Household and Supplementary Relief Grants have been awarded to 135
individuals and/or households since July, for a total of $156,906; and
WHEREAS, new application volumes have begun to decrease, as evidenced by a lower
application volume during the most recent application round in August; and
WHEREAS, individuals and/or households who received grants in previous months may
continue to be experiencing financial stress and/or need for support with housing or household
expenses; and
WHEREAS, continuing need experienced by individuals and/or households is immediate
and pervasive, requiring access to funds without delay;
NOW THEREFORE;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection B of Section 4 of Ordinance 4189 is hereby amended to read as
follows (new text shown in underline):
B. Account `B" shall be the existing, City Council -approved "Housing and
Supplemental Relief Program" account into which a supplemental infusion of
$300,000 to that program from the CARES Act funding shall be allocated to
reimburse those City expenditures incurred through said Program, in compliance
with the CARES Act eligibility criteria. In addition, $50,000 from the Community
and Economic Relief Program, initially earmarked as a potential second round of
funding for the Chamber Foundation WISH Grant program, shall be reallocated to
this account. Grant awards shall be in amounts up to $1,000 for households of one
to two members, while grant awards may be in amounts of up to $1,500 for
Packet Pg. 118
7.5.a
households of three or more members. More than one grant per household over
the program period may be authorized, based on an analysis of on -going need and
consideration of other new applications. An additional Snohomish County -based
human services organization shall be engaged by the City to assist in
administration of the existing Program.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 3. Declaration of Emergency. The City Council hereby declares that an
emergency exists necessitating that this Ordinance take effect immediately upon passage by a
majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the Council, and that the same is not subject
to a referendum (RCW 35A.12.130). The region is in the midst of a state of emergency due to
the COVID-19 virus, which has also become an economic emergency for many households,
particularly those who earned less than 60% of the Snohomish County median income in 2019.
Section 4. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect
immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of
the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is only approved by
a majority of the Council, it will take effect five days after passage and publication.
/_11»WGILTAC103
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
Packet Pg. 119
7.5.a
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED :
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
:•
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 120
7.5.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2020, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the
title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND
AMENDING ORDINANCE 4189, EDMONDS CARES
FUND
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2020.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 121
7.5.b
ORDINANCE NO. 4189
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND
CREATING A NEW EDMONDS CARES FUND WHICH
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
WHEREAS, our city and region are experiencing a public health emergency due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to sudden job losses, lower paychecks, and increased
household costs to deal with COVID-19 impacts for many residents, as well as business/revenue
losses for many local businesses; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor declared an emergency of the city due to the COVID-19 crisis on
March 5, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Governor issued a Stay Home order on March 23,
2020, and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2020, the Governor stated that "A safe return to public life will
require increased social and emotional support, food and housing security, educational and child
care support, internet infrastructure and equitable access to services"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 8, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution, the City is
allowed to use public funds "for the necessary support of the poor and infirm;" and
WHEREAS, unemployment claims have increased greatly since the COVID-19 crisis
Began, with a high of 138,733 regular unemployment insurance initial claims in the week of
May 10, 2020 in Washington State, according to the state Department of Employment Security;
and
WHEREAS, households earning 60% or less of the county median income are among the
most affected by sudden drops in income and/or increased expenses; and
WHEREAS, about 25% of Edmonds' households earned 60% or less of the Snohomish
County median family income in 2019; and
WHEREAS, the economic crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic and related
business shutdowns has severely impacted local businesses, resulting in substantial losses of
revenue, employee furloughs, layoffs and cutbacks, and additional expenses; and
WHEREAS, businesses other than those deemed "essential" by the Governor's orders,
have been particularly impacted by business losses due to prolonged shutdowns; and
Packet Pg. 122
7.5.b
WHEREAS, some businesses in Edmonds employ a principally lower -wage employee
base, providing entry-level or low -barrier job opportunities for local residents; and
WHEREAS, many businesses that have suffered financially during the COVID-19-
related economic crisis face an uncertain future that could lead to business closures, as well as
employee furloughs and lay-offs; and
WHEREAS, some local residents in lower -income households, including those at or
below 60% of Snohomish County median income, are employed by local businesses and would
be even more adversely impacted if these businesses fail and/or substantially reduce available
jobs; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.12.130 allows city councils to adopt public emergency
ordinances, provided that the ordinance is passed by a majority plus one of the city council and
meets other requirements of the statute; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that COVID-19 and its associated impacts have
created a public health emergency, making it necessary for the protection of public health and
public safety to adopt an emergency ordinance to prevent homelessness and reduce health and
safety impacts by providing temporary assistance to qualifying households; and
WHEREAS, the City Council created the Housing and Supplementary Relief Program by
reallocating $100,000 from the Homelessness Response Fund to serve as funding grants of up to
$1,000 to individuals and households experiencing income loss, emergency expenses, imminent
housing insecurity, etc.; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor created a Community and Economic Relief Program, funded by
$200,000 in savings from City departments and consisting of three programs: 1) support to the
Edmonds Food Bank, 2) support to the Edmonds Senior Center, and 3) support to the Edmonds
Chamber Foundation WISH Fund business grants; and
WHEREAS, Governor Inslee announced that the state would award $300 million of the
state's CARES funding to local governments that did not receive direct distributions under the
CARES Act; and
WHEREAS, the CARES Act provides that payments from the Fund may be used to cover
costs that:
1. are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect
to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19);
Packet Pg. 123
7.5.b
2. were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020
(the date of enactment of the CARES Act) for the State or government; and
3. were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December
30, 2020; and
WHEREAS, funds may not be used to fill shortfalls in government revenue to cover
expenditures that would not otherwise qualify under the statute. Although a broad range of uses
is allowed, revenue replacement is not a permissible use of Fund payments; and
WHEREAS, the CARES Act also specifies that expenditures using Fund payments must
be "necessary." The Department of the Treasury understands this term broadly to mean that the
expenditure is reasonably necessary for its intended use in the reasonable judgment of the
government officials responsible for spending Fund payments; and
WHEREAS, The CARES Act also requires that payments be used only to cover costs
that were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020. A cost
meets this requirement if either (a) the cost cannot lawfully be funded using a line item,
allotment, or allocation within that budget or (b) the cost is for a substantially different use from
any expected use of funds in such a line item, allotment, or allocation; and
WHEREAS, the "most recently approved" budget refers to the enacted budget for the
relevant fiscal period for the particular government, without taking into account subsequent
supplemental appropriations enacted or other budgetary adjustments made by that government in
response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. A cost is not considered to have been
accounted for in a budget merely because it could be met using a budgetary stabilization fund,
rainy day fund, or similar reserve account. Eligible costs must have incurred during the period
that begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on December 30, 2020; and
WHEREAS, Eligible expenditures include, but are not limited to, payment for:
1. Expenses of actions to facilitate compliance with COVID-19-related public health
measures, including:
• Expenses for food delivery to residents, including, for example, senior citizens
and other vulnerable populations, to enable compliance with COVID-19 public
health precautions.
• Expenses for care for homeless populations provided to mitigate COVID-19
effects and enable compliance with COVID-19 public health precautions.
Packet Pg. 124
7.5.b
• Expenses to assist individuals with payment of overdue rent or mortgage
payments to avoid eviction or foreclosure or unforeseen financial costs for
funerals and other emergency individual needs.
2. Expenses associated with the provision of economic support in connection with the
COVID-19 public health emergency, including:
• Expenditures related to the provision of grants to small businesses to reimburse
the costs of business interruption caused by required closures.
3. Any other COVID-19-related expense reasonably necessary to the function of
government that satisfy the Fund's eligibility criteria;
WHEREAS the City will be eligible for up to $1,265,100 of the CARES funding from
the state; and
NOW THEREFORE;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Edmonds hereby accepts an allocation of up to $1,265,100 as the
City of Edmonds' Federal CARES Act allocation, as administered and disbursed by the
Washington State Department of Commerce in the form of reimbursable funds, in accordance
with Federal CARES Act guidelines. Further the City Council authorizes the Mayor to enter into
the corresponding contract(s) with the Department of Commerce for administration and
disbursement of these funds.
Section 2. The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to create and
number a new fund to be known as the Edmonds CARES Fund for the purpose of accounting for
CARES Act -eligible payments used to facilitate compliance with COVID-19-related public
health measures, expenses associated with the provision of economic support in connection with
the COVID-19 public health emergency, and any other COVID-19-related expenses reasonably
necessary to the function of the City that satisfy the Act's eligibility criteria.
Section 3. The Edmonds CARES Fund shall be administered by the Administrative
Services Director under the direction of the Mayor.
Section 4. There shall be kept by and under the direction of the Administrative Services
Director, such books, accounts and records as are necessary to control and report the CARES
Packet Pg. 125
7.5.b
eligible expenditures, and shall further subdivide the cash account thereof into three separately
designated accounts as follows:
A. Account "A" shall be the "COVID-19 City Expenditure Reimbursement" account into
which $265,100 of the CARES Act funding shall be allocated to reimburse those direct
City expenditures required to provide City services in response to the COVID-19
emergency that satisfy the CARES Act eligibility criteria.
B. Account `B" shall be the existing, City Council -approved "Housing and Supplemental
Relief Program" account into which a supplemental infusion of $300,000 to that program
from the CARES Act funding shall be allocated to reimburse those City expenditures
incurred through said Program, in compliance with the CARES Act eligibility criteria. In
addition, $50,000 from the Community and Economic Relief Program, initially
earmarked as a potential second round of funding for the Chamber Foundation WISH
Grant program, shall be reallocated to this account. Grant awards shall be in amounts up
to $1,000 for households of one to two members, while grant awards may be in amounts
of up to $1,500 for households of three or more members. An additional Snohomish
County -based human services organization shall be engaged by the City to assist in
administration of the existing Program.
C. Account "C" shall be the "Edmonds Business Support Grant Program" account into
which $700,000 of the CARES Act funding shall be allocated to reimburse those City
expenditures incurred through provision of individual financial support grants (in the
form of loans that are forgivable after four months of performance) of up to $10,000,
through an open, competitive application process, to eligible businesses that have
suffered substantial business losses and additional expenses due to the COVID-19
economic crisis, in compliance with the CARES Act eligibility criteria, which criteria
shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
i. Businesses with zero to thirty employees (part-time and full-time combined)
ii. A demonstrated year -over -year business/revenue loss of at least 30% in April or
May 2020;
iii. In business in Edmonds at least one year as of April 1, 2020;
iv. Declared intent and expectation to remain in business at least four months after
receipt of the grant;
Packet Pg. 126
7.5.b
In addition, the Mayor and City staff shall employ reasonable, objective and score -based
selection criteria to award grants to applicants, as required in the case of a large number
of applications, including such considerations as the following:
i. Particular consideration will be given to businesses owned by people of color,
women, veterans, and other minorities;
ii. Particular consideration will be given to those businesses that have not received
federal, state or county government assistance, and secondary consideration will
be given to those businesses that received lower -than -requested amounts of
federal, state or county government assistance;
iii. Greater consideration will be given to those businesses that have experienced
relatively greater business/revenue loss year -over -year in April or May 2020;
iv. Particular consideration will be given to geographic distribution across Edmonds'
various business districts in the award of these grants;
V. Particular consideration will be given to creative -sector businesses within the
State -certified Edmonds Creative District;
Section 5. In the case that there is any unused, City of Edmonds allocation from the
Federal CARES Act funds remaining ten days prior to the Department of Commerce expenditure
deadline, the amount of that allocation shall be used to purchase personal protective equipment
and supplies for use by the City and/or for distribution to direct -service, residential -based care
centers.
Section 6. The authority provided in Section 1 shall end by December 31, 2020.
Section 7. Any organization assisting the City in providing emergency aid under Section
4(B) shall provide a monthly written report to the City. The Administration shall provide the City
Council and general public a monthly written report about the amount of aid provided by the
City, the purpose and criteria by which it has been distributed, the reimbursement received from
the Department of Commerce, and any other pertinent information regarding the grant programs
outlined in Sections 4(B) and 4(C) above.
Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
Packet Pg. 127
7.5.b
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 9. Declaration of Emergency. The City Council hereby declares that an
emergency exists necessitating that this Ordinance take effect immediately upon passage by a
majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the Council, and that the same is not subject
to a referendum (RCW 35A.12.130). The region is in the midst of a state of emergency due to
the COVID-19 virus, which has also become an economic emergency for many households,
particularly those who earned less than 60% of the Snohomish County median income in 2019,
and local businesses that have been shut down or conducting a fraction of their regular business
during most of the past three months.
Section 10. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect
immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it is approved by a majority plus one of
the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130. If it is only approved by
a majority of the Council, it will take effect five days after passage and publication.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK,
Packet Pg. 128