Loading...
110 JAMES ST (2)_RedactedFSNO D Serving Brier, Edmonds, and 12425 Meridian Ave S Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT ❑ EDMONDS ❑ BRIER ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ❑ UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: BUSINESS NAME: PHONE: SCHEDULED DATE DUE MAILING UFIR / ADDRESS: BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: .EMERGENCY -I: HOME PHONE: CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: Q0 LA)L I V 2 lJ Z' " ✓ - / I GPI S HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 1 a L O A) AIAM f7 G a4-✓ (sr- 6 .< i L� 2 - ✓rL k 0 01A 2 s 3-3 C.flL1N% rt1I-- 5T1 LL (,;5 I/V..(y _3 �.I �- L- GM �.� �' U r'J LOnI\ r1 f _o l� --_ �-t s/G�F - -_Foy 4 5 3 4 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X In our continuing effort to promote fire safety and prevention within the community, your fire department conducts regularly scheduled "Fire Safety Survey Inspections" of all businesses and multi -family occupancies in the Cities covered by Snohomish County Fire District 1. You are to be congratulated on the relative good condition of your occupancy in regards to fire safety. Above you will find the item(s) that were noted during. our inspection which require attention to bring them into compliance with the minimum standards adopted by the above jurisdictions. Any overlooked hazards or violations. of the fire regulations does not imply approval of such conditions or violation. If you require additional information or to schedule a re -inspection for Edmonds, call (425) 775-7720; for Mountlake Terrace or Brier, call (425) 744-6231. 7— kil FIRE PREVENTION Serving Brier, Edmonds, and 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT SN0HON11SH CIO WA 98208 FIRE Mountlake Terrace Everett, ❑ BRERNDS �" 1�110ne (425) .SSl _1200 ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE DISTRT www.FireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 [1 UNINCORPORATED •110 James Street Building 98020 LOCATION: Edmonds Financial Cntr & Condos 4256408660 BUSINESS NAME: PHONE: MAILING 110 James Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 ADDRESS: Meeks, Michael BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: LCM 4256408660 EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: KEY ACCESS-2: ) HOME PHONE: h EMAIL: ( / � i PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: C. Date Last Serviced: i 1 � k4ll '10/(0'k III HAZARDS FOUND AND LOC FION MQ0 IN CVlON6••-••-•- 2 V� 6 7 %%UeFY STAJIft SHIFT SCHEDULED eC DATE DUE ► UFIR ► CURRENT CITY NO BUSINESS LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE a 1 -.2 3 4 Y 5 r. 6 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION < FINAL RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTEDTO. DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON i PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: ;CONTACTED' INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: `•. INSPECTOR: ` 2 DATE, DATE* DATE. 3 _ VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 1 : 5 .. .. 1 . 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 ' - CODE - 5 2 6 2 6 DATE SECTION. _ RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED 6 3 DISPOSITION. 4 ' 8 4 8 DATE T LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO € 8 FIRE PREVENTION Serving Brier, Edmonds, and 12425 Meridian Ave S IN PECTION REPORT SNOHOMISH CO. ESDMONDS FIR � Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 ❑ BRIER Phone (425) 551-1200 ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE DISTw wwFireDistrictl.org .Fax (425) 551-1272 ❑UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 110 James Street Building 98020 Annual 17-D BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Financial Cntr & Condos PHONE: 4256408660 SCHEDULED DATE DUE Dec 2015 / MAILING UFIR / 509 ADDRESS: 110 James Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: Meeks, Michael HOME PHONE:. EMERGENCY 1: LCM HOME PHONE: 4256408660 CURRENT ' KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO. BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE Ej PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 2 1� FIRE SYSTEMS: AS 5/15 FA 5/15 FE S / I�FD Lk Box SP 11/11 -fir Date Last Sery ced: .HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS -t _? .. 4 -3 4 ]• 4i"k .: Y - .:eft n,, q,. � ,..:.::ay-,rv»:w+w„yy- - _ .. 5 , , ._..-.. ._-. ..._. _-__...--_. ..3. 6 f.' 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: 15 /� GRANTED TO• PERSON - / / � I!� DATE DUE: - DATE DUE _......_�_.., -�, _CITED: CONTACTED: (� 0< PERSON PERSON '.._ CONTACTED: M���S t CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: C SNj� INSPECTOR: f n9S7vN 2 ,- - INSPECTOR: DATE: �< DATE: v' �� �� 3 �i....._._ _ __ ___DATE:' 1 n� VIOLAIO S m ,---, 4 1 VJO ONS;,,,- ----LETTER SENT NUMBER: - CITATIONISSUED - -�-'- O`/ PRE -CITATION _-_-____._. jj CODE -. _... 1 6 2 6 - DATE: SECTION: S _ _..._-.. RETURN RECEIPT 7 3 ? 3 _ RECEIVED. 6 _ ; DISPOSITION: 7 4 i 8 4 8 DATE: LETTER NEEDED _ _......®-.._. .._. _..- _-._,.....--..-_........_--__..__..-. ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO _ - _ 8 GUARDLAN SECURffY —Fire Deparlment "=It Ll U�Ibqo�­ imb ri,vAvenmS"Ilo "35 plwou NO O204 160 t K.,,W.ky SI—t CONFOENCE TESTING S.a1t12,'A!A W.34 SiNedaltAIA WWI 98229 301447.0ti0 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (CTF-8) t4bo Uclion Date of Inspection -N tl�,NNW Addiem e. u 30ding CAg-,er MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL C h9l, KS nual Scent-AonLA 91-19anihty U mW%my .ar -.1urt V�­ 1. Cxijol:Pah Wa. . -f ik l Na. of IrillatirV CIrt0s $ — #2 9 ffn2 �' d. Ba--te-y Voltagm LndL 5 CbaYge,* uryTest burat,orr 6 7 L;t:15 GI;1na1V4-*.kC P rror �: Yea I No C N A 6 ytnln77-7­=7'7 7. All chf;ijjjs Pon',= za71st3ctory Ori Ste xibj jPall trti prywni;_rW a. All Circuits OnoqjSifiAlpx1ory On AC; POWOC I!,.0 NiA Explain: f 10. Conitol Panel Check- r-Aade Per V,.srajIa(4uTais Ine.rt m.oru: Q y.s N+0 FINA Expiatn, 7 • i.mij A.-xaary EquEpnrart Oporztes * Avg 'i'a _6,ir ,Mlys J nf,z stemtlfttA Oil j.!kA ,,pl, n: 13 tAorjtcri,.qStatiFin��lr-rrnCirtUit(61: tK4os Q No Cl WA Explo!A,. Iaim 7�.,7t�! 13++. P*ankl Kc y Av�ut1 ab!e; Yes No 1_1 WA Expmin rn 9 ihsirLOi:ni`at anec, I T. lastiServicu Rcuir J at Fire ',[a( f'n Curt of P eroul;' Ye$ No if no, whenstled? EQUIPMENT TYPE IN O.b OF U14M -,4ESULTS NO.'OF UNITS T Audi" (Bells, Hoans, crimes : lvdcc, harp , iflStial,Alatr Aucio.MiLml De ices _4 Wj� No Troible Irdiwitirs Y" No y Aute. Door Ijn1c4s (Fell Sale Opetullari) Yes No " AuIP..0PqC,++ elebs? ;: � .. , +:. +: t:+:, Yee _4`�L� F-110ST.oke Dmnpers (Ventilatim Is) yes "a Premans Phones yes No '0uiAc:Ajdr F-,, [,'H01L:G Phase #1 yes A_ Ho PN4e #2 Generator Start yes "a Aulumhfla Sprinkler SuperAsurvD,Aiid 4DS Yes Nc *IqlCt. 6 V_ 7 Gu:itrol Valve Sidp-xvimry SwAturev Yea No 7FT77 777 tort aj tic Bsll1do4J';.. 77777 Fhe Deparlmeni Winilcell)q Yes No Conuany rbene 3; A..aan W-aritodr, g Yes No This Certifies that this fire alarm system has boon properly Inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Ownar.1141anageT for corrective Action. S i0 t 04P Sig."I!L-re Of- FaC;?y ()Kravia __ Extee goz!�ge e G led f 9P n 7cchrx0r, Problems FOirid, Criarection Made: Tednciar 4 Dale Ray. 01u: i I,1u2 Proprietary and Confidential I, mum".— a GlV/iliRDlAN SECURITY Fire Department toseenta ❑slivardals ❑eailk*am u.. a cuAecS&MICs CONFIDENCE TESTING 1743FhtAvwnmSoum 9435 Pmvad Rd #204 1501 Ksauoy SbMml AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (CTF-4) S&W,* WA 96134 Sabwdele, WA 99M . 8s6 Own, WA 98229 106.B22 MS M-U24"O 3so-W-0110 Date of Inspection r•ea0.2a2esa9 !- 3Gc-10o5 Address �'��' `� `= Building No. Occupied has = System No. Building Owner 1� 4,v, `=- Phone# Address `-� t1.c.�� city r� c7Nrs�% State QQrN Zip Code Type of inspection: ',Annual ❑ Other DRY SYSTEM 1. Trip test (dry trip) conducted: System tripped in seconds. 2. All flow switches, supervisory switch and alarm bells tested. 3. Alarm bell operates. V 4. Flow tests conducted..,'Fi4w pressure_r____ psi . 5. Systems inspected lid lubricated. 6. Air compressor efills system in 30 minutes. 7, System dra' ed and restored to normal operation. 6. Were the eat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system. WILT SYSTEM 1. Flow test conducted. aYes O No Static pressure% psi 2. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested. 3. Alarm bell operates . 4: Systems inspected and lubricated. 5. Pressure regulating valves tested. GENERAL 1. Location of sprinklers ❑ Basement ❑ Hallways 100% 2. Pumper connections and clapper unobstructed. 3. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old. 4. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable. 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available. 6. Systems left in service, 7. Valves are sealed or supervised. 8. Signs are'-r�{vi- on valves. Problems Founi3 `r'1 � :i's'1C_'t�PlscTi'on h71a 1 Date Corrected By: oyes Ci No ❑ NIAExpWri: ❑Yes 71 No ❑ N/AExplain: !Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: f i-1Yes ❑ No G N/AExplain:.,/ []Yes ❑ No ❑ NJAExp --Yes 0 No E. N/ plain: Oyes r_i No ; "Explain: ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: Flow pressure 40 psi. 2-inch drain? 09. Yes D No Yes G No ❑ N/AExplain: KYes 7.1 No ❑ N/AExplain: &Yes ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: L--'Yes C No LAN/AExplain: Q-i Other Yes Ci No ❑ NIAExplain: - Wes © No r-=i N/A Explain: OQYes Q No ,—I NIA Explai n: Yes ❑ No IL-) N/AExplain: LRYes ❑ No C WAExplain: Yes U No 1 N/AExplain: des "I No ❑ WA Explain: :.tip. 0� ~�ke ► 4 This Certifies ittat this sprinkler system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report Is consistent with fire alarm maintananco standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the buitdina Owner/ Manager far corrective Action. Signature of Tester .fie w _ Certification No. ' ? Rev. 69tB8 ` "Proprietary & Confidential" GUARDIAN SECURITV Fire Department VC01 NG ;QQ "tth ❑silvardale ❑6*11inyhtan Lie, 9GUARN6=K5 COI'�I'IDENCE 1 t�nuosoWh WlKKwtucWSk" AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (CTF-4) 206.422-SUS 360-W-37M W-60-010 Date of Inspection C%VQ1 -W1 \k1) 1.800-262-ag9e Address 1r0 } 8Q03661D06 Building No. `= Occupied as �: '::a.i1`.> L�°`'���' ' System No. Building Owner - Phone# Address City. State Zip Code Type of Inspection: D Annual ❑ Other DRY SYSTEM 1. Trip test (dry trip) conducted: System tripped in `. seconds. 2. All flow switches, supervisory switch and alarm bails tested. 3. Alarm bell operates .� 4. Flow tests conducted. Flow pressure_1a -psi. 5. Systems inspected and lubricated. 6. Aar compressor refills system in 30 minutes. 7. System drained and restored to normal operation. 8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system. WET SYSTEM 1. Flow test condu W.0 Yes J No Static pressure psi 2. Flow switch , supervisory switches and alarm bells tested. 3. Alarm operates . 4. Systems inspected and lubricated. 5. Pressure reguiatang valves tested. GENERAL 1. Location of sprinklers Basement D Hallways D 1MIO 2. Pumper connections and clapper unobstructed. 3. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old. 4. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable. 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available. 6. Systems left in service. 7. Valves are sealed or supervised. 8. Signs are provided on valves. Problems Found:"`�``�-► Correction Made: Date Corrected — BY'. I,Yes D No G N/AExplain: Ices O No D N/AExplain: aYes n No G €V1AExplain: '. as ❑ ho WAExplain: KYes n No CI N/AExplain: $ Yes D No O WAExplain: (6Yes NNo D N/A Explain: DYes D No' (kN/A Explain: Flow pressure psi. 2-inch drain? E. Yes n No LYes 0 No D N/AExplain: CIYes n NaAExplain: oyes D Nd D N/AExplain: DYes ❑ No D N/A Explain: El Other XYes D No U N/A Explain, Yes D No ❑ N/A Explain: !Yes D No O N/AExplain: es Flo l_ i N/AExplain: IkYes D No Q N/AExplain: +es IA No D N/A Explain: Yes l..' No�.,D N/AExplain: This Certifies that this sprinkler system has been property inspected for reliability to cover'the items listed in this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancles are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/ Manager for corrective Action. Signature of Tasf �,�„— Certification No. 44 Fiay. $3196 "Proprietary & Confidential" Serving Brier, Edmonds, and 12425 Meridian Ave S Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 www FireDistrictl. org Fax (425) 551-1272. _.. LOCATION: 110 James Street 98020 BUSINESS NAME: 110 James St. Condos PHONE: 4256408660 MAILING ADDRESS: 110 James Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT "!,/EDMONDS ❑ BRIER ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ❑ UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT Annual 17-D SCHEDULED DATE DUE ► Dec 2015 UFIR ► 541 BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: EMERGENCY-1: Meeks, Mike/ Suite 110 HOME PHONE: 4257758198 CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: '+ HOME PHONE: CITY YES . NO EMAIL: BUSINESS 9 ❑ LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: t j //� NAME OF INSPECTOR: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE F FIRE SYSTEMS: FE ' / HAZARDS FOUND AND LOC'ATIONSS / COMMUNICATIONS /J ?.........--- r---z 2 3 4 4 _5___ 5 6 6 7 I AGREE TO.CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTED TO: DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: _ DATE: - DATE: 3 ____._- VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS,,.^,- ^,. PRE -CITATION T�CITATIONISSUED 1 5 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 ( 6 - DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 RETURN RECEIPT 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED 6 DISPOSITION: 4 8 4 $ DATE: 7 LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 8 a... . it ......._. ?UA&7DIAN SECURITY Seanft ❑ Silverdale ❑ Bellingham 1743 Fi. Avenue South 9436 Provost Rd a204 1501 Kentucky Street Seanla, WA 98174 Silverdale, WA S8383 Bellingham, WA 93229 1.800-282-6998 360-392.3738 360447-0110' Lic. # GUARDSS233K5 1.800-366.1005 Facility Q Address Building Owner _ S &"\ - "0 S Fire Department CONFIDENCE TESTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (CTF-8) Date of Inspection G - S -a0NA MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL CH GKS nnual 0 Semi -Annual 1. Control Panel Manufacturer 16�1 2. No. of Initiating Circuits No. of Signaling 3. Static Battery Voltages: # 02 #3 I 4. Battery Voltages Under Load w/S* al Devices Operating: #1 #2 #a #4 _ 5. Charge Circuit Voltage: ,.\ Battery Test Duration: mina. 6. Trouble Signal w/AC Power Off: Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 7. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On Standby (Battery) Power: Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA 8. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On AC Power: Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 9. All Circuits Checked For Electrical Supervision. Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA 10. Control Panel Checks Made Per Manufacturers Instructions: 5(Yes ❑ No O NIA 11. All Auxiliary Equipment Operates (Elevators, HVAC Fan shut down, Door closures, Vent dampers, Etc.): 14es ❑ No ❑ NIA 12. Does Alarm System Meet Audibility Standards: [7 . O No 13. Monitoring Station Alarm Circuit(s): 1yes n No 14. Alarm Delay Function (if installed) Operates Properly: ❑ Yes ❑ N 15. Panel Key Available: Nos ON: 16.Operating Instructions at Panel: OkYes ❑ No 17. Test/Service Record at Fire Alarm Control Panel: -S 1 es ❑ No EQUIPMENT TYPE Audio (Bells, Hems, Chimes, Voice Alarm Speakers) Visual Alarm Devices Audio/Visual Devices Smoke Detectors Heal Detectors Manual Pull Stations Trouble Indicators Annunciators Auto Door Unlocks (Fail Safe Operation) Auto Door Release Fire/Smoke Dampers (Ventilation Controls) Duct Detectors Firemans Phones Public Address System Elevator Capture Phase #1 Phase #2 Generator Starts Automatic Sprinkler Flow Swatches Automatic Sprinkler Supervisory Switches Automatic Sprinkler Valve Tamper Switches Control Valve Supervisory Switches Exterior Water Motor-BeIVGong Fire Department Monitoring Monitoring Station -Signal received Name of Alarm Monitoring Company Other Phone# Quarterly R C: 6-Monthly ❑ Monthly Modal _ Explain: Explain: �✓ A Explain: ❑ NIA Explain: p N/A Explain: Ar AIA Explain: Of ❑ NIA Explain: NIA Explain: If no, where filed? NO. OF UNITS RESULTS Yes No Yes_ No Yes No Yea No Yes No Yes No Yes vy No Yes _6_ No Yes _ No Yes _ No NO. OF UNITS IN 8&tING Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes No Yes Yes_ No No 1 _ Yes No Yes X No Yes _ Yes _ No No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes Yes No No Yes _ No This Certifies that this fire alarm system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported t n the buildiOwner/Manager for corrective Action. Signature of..., Facility Owner/Manager Signature o lnspe or/Tech ' ian MalZ78 Technician License # Technician Certification # Problems Found: Correction Made: Date Corrected By: Rev. 06/11/02 Proprietary and Confidential ty, 0 11111 — GUARD/AN SECURITY K—_3 Mo:\3 S Fire Department s..ew ❑SHvordele PmvLw �.� oe®mneham 1 Uc.0GUARDSS233KS CONFIDENCE TESTING SOME. WA98134 sSi wdal, WA 98�,+s e WA 982229 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (CTF-4) 206-M-045 1-800-282-098 36D-U2-3738 380-W-0110 Date of Inspection S - za NA L! Address 1.80038&1OM Se2� Building No. Sa.M� Occupied asu =cwt \eS, CoZV-_� System No. Building Owner Sd rrAe_ Phone# Address .cJ\+Z City State Zip Code Type of inspection: C%Annual ❑ Other DRY SYSTEM 1. Trip test (dry trip) conducted: System tripped in seconds. 2. All flow switches, supervisory swit ala m bells tested. 3. Alarm bell operates . 4. Flow tests conducted. pressure psi . 5. *Systems inspected d lubricated. 6. Air compressor fills system in 30 minutes. 7. System drai d and restored to normal operation. 8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system. WET SYSTEM 1. Flow test conducted. J1 Yes ❑ No Static pressure 0;_ psi 2. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested. 3. Alarm bell operates. 4. Systems inspected and lubricated. 5. Pressure regulating valves tested. GENERAL 1 • Location of sprinklers ❑ Basement O Hallways 1V100% 2. Pumper connections and clapper unobstructed. 3. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old. 4. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable. 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available. 6. Systems left in service. 7. Valves are sealed or supervised. 8. Signs are provided on valves. ProVms Found: o A Font Correction Made: S. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: ❑Yes ❑ No O N/A Explain: ❑Yes ❑ No O N/AExplain: ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: ❑Yes O No O N/A n: ❑Yes ❑ No O Explain: ❑Yes ❑ No G N/A Explain: i Flow pressure ' psi. 27inch drain? IN Yes ❑ No MYes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: C-Yes ❑ No O N/AExplain: t�Yes ❑ No C N/AExplain: ❑Yes ❑ No la/AExplain: O Other I(Yes ❑ No KYes O No [XYes O No Wes ❑ No CWYes ❑ No IRYes ❑ No Ryes ❑ No Ce i�a.xy e ��. Date Corrected By: ❑ N/A Explain: ❑ N/A Explain: O N/AExplain: 3e b \o O N/A Explain: ❑ N/AExplain: O N/AExplain: O N/AExplain: This Certifies that this sprinkler system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed In this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/ Manager for corrective on. Signature of Tester: i?�'�" '� Certification No. SC - C7 a�53 Pay. 6/3" "Proprietary & Confidential" OUARD AN SECURITY JS Fire Department ❑311rerdale ❑sellinghem LIe.1GUARCSSZ33K5 CONFIDENCE TESTING 713 F6a! A`enuo South 9435 Provost Rd 0204 1501 Kentucky sbeeet Staab. WA98134 S9verdab. WA 98M Softha,n. WA 98M AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (CTF-4) 20&422-WS3 Z-3738 ; 10 1�oa2a2.5e9e 05 Date of Inspection f a -S - Zo1 y Address \\O <'t Building No. Occupied as System No. Building Owner Phone# Address City State Zip Code Type of inspection: ZAnnual ❑ Other DRY SYSTEM 1. Trip test (dry trip) conducted: System tripped in seconds. VYes ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: 2. All flow switches, supervisory switch and alarm bells tested. &KIYeS ❑:No O WAExplain: 3. Alarm bell operates . 1_0Ye 6 No ❑ WAExplain: 4. Flow tests conducted. Flow pressure 12S psi . Yes ❑ No O N/AExplain: 5. 'Systems inspected and lubricated. NYes ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: 6. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes. $lYes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: 7. System drained and restored to normal operation. ❑Yes ❑ No U/AExplain: 8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge system. ❑Yes O No ❑ N/A Explain: WET SYSTEM 1. Flow test conducted. ❑ Yes ❑ No Static pressure psi. Flow pressure psi. 2-inch drain? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A Ex lain: 3. Alarm bell operates. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ xplain: 4. Systems inspecte d lubricated. OYes ❑ No • N/AExplain: 5. Pressure regula ng valves tested. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: GENERAL ! 1. Location of sprinklers ❑ Basement ❑ Hallways ❑ 100% R) Other AA 6 cg cs, -e— 2. Pumper connections and clapper unobstructed. KYes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: 3. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old. XYes O No ❑ N/A Explain: 4. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable. XIYes O No ❑ N/AExplain: 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available. PNs ❑ No O N/AExplain: 6. Systems left in service. SkYes ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: 7. Valves are sealed or supervised. Ves ❑ No ❑ N/A Explain: 8. Signs are provided on valves. es ❑ No ❑ N/AExplain: Problems Found: l� e Q-) Correction Made: Date Corrected By: This Certifies that this sprinkler system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed In this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance stand rds, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/ Manager for corrective on. yu Signature of Tester: ` Certification No. � O c95-�I3 Rev. 8Pd198 "Proprietary & Confidential" Serving Brier: Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace www FireDistrictl. org 12425 Meridian Ave S Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 LOCATION: 110 James Street Building 98020 BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Financial Cntr & Condos PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: 110 James Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 Em FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT EDMONDS BRIER ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ❑ UNINCORPORATED ol FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT Annual 17-B SCHEDULED Dec 2013 DATE DUE UFIR 1 509 BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: Email: EMERGENCY-1: LCM HOME PHONE: 4256408660 CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: I HOME PHONE: (��tO CITY YES NO EMAIL: iao B CENSES PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE �I 11�{ NAME OF INSPECTOR: Lo,yrS,a-� 4 vZ FIRE SYSTEMS: AS 11/11 FA t 4t rFE ,'' FG Lk Box SP 11/11 qb? -- HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 1 A. wa __ %4^�^_5 O p 1 O S4iv,Vj `1 2 � - �� do0� 6 �k 2 a iL 3 .t4ct4 /C�X�� od1.I«� I{r �-�-5 3 02$ 4�� �, �U Oki 4 '� 1 5 iYi !i �J �Ou^ih ,A` ZLIL (, o 5 AA 6 f. 1 6 c� 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X In our continuing effort to promote fire safety and prevention within the community, your fire department conducts regularly scheduled "Fire Safety Survey Inspections" of all businesses and multi -family occupancies in the Cities covered by Snohomish County Fire District 1. You are to be congratulated on the relative good condition of your occupancy in regards to fire safety..;Above you will find the item(s) that were noted during our inspectionn which require attention to bring them into compliance with the minimum standards adopted by the above jurisdictions. Any overlooked hazards or violations of the fire regulations does not imply approval of such conditions or violation. If you require additional information or to schedule a re -inspection for Edmonds or the Town of Woodway, call (425) 775-7720; for Mountlake Terrace or Brier, call (425) 754-0434. BUSINESS COPY P1 GUARDIAN SECURITY Seattle - Tacoma - Poulsbo - Bellingham 1743 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 Tel: 206.622.6545 Fax: 206.341.9928 May 29, 2013 APPROWD City of Edmonds�� Development Services 1215 `h Avenue N.,� L� �. 7i3 ( .3 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Replacing existing Fire Panel with a new Silent Knight 5208 and Silent Knight 5235 Annunciator Guardian Security would like to replace the existing Fire Panel (SK- 5207) with a new Fire Panel (SK 5208) along with an Annunciator (SK 5235). James Street Building 110 James Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Thank you, Traci Adams Guardian Security 1743 First Ave. South Seattle, WA 98134 Phone: 206-622-6545 Ext: 217 Email: tadams(aDguardiansecuritycom CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEP�RTMEW WORK rirz- Panes ADDRESS ®tf Q j - s OWNER bm �°� J aYh�S APPROVED DATE:---- BLDG. OFFICIAL Prl� PERMIT NUMBER 2-eI-o5-7 Co fteelo, DFVFAy �U ,?y Cppk 0��NTFRFRV/�F`. 3SILENT 8 KNIGHT by Honeywell Model 5208 Fire Alarm Control Panel with Digital Communicator The Fire Alarm Control Designed to Grow with Your Systems Needs, Without The Growing Pains. The SK-5208 is a microprocessor based control panel with built-in UL listed communicator designed for applications requiring smoke detection, manual pull stations, and sprinkler supervision. It features an easy to read LCD display with programmable English readout and user friendly tactile keys. The basic unit offers 10 zones of initiation and is expandable up to 30 zones for larger applications. The SK-5208 has a complete line of supervised accessories that provide remote annunciation, auxiliary control zone expansion. Ideal for new and retrofit applications, the SK-5208 delivers the performance to handle your installation. Features • 10 zones, 8 Class B (Style B) and 2 Class A (Style D) or Class B (Style B) zones, expandable to 30 zones • Supervised zone expanders and 1/0 modules can be mounted remotely from the main control panel • Event History Buffer (150 events) with date/time stamp • All zones are compatible with 2- or 4-wire detectors • 8 selectable/programmable output patterns for notification appliance circuits • Built-in Digital Alarm Communicator Transmitter (DACT) • 4 Notification Appliance Circuits • 4 programmable general purpose relays • Programmable smoke verification, pre -alarm delay, cross zoning and enhanced verification mode features that can help minimize false alarms • Programmable from the built-in control panel touchpad, remote annunciator, or Windows® SKSS downloading software • Direct connect port for on -site up/downloading with Windows® SKSS downloading software • Built-in walk test feature • Single or dual interlock water releasing capability • Plex door option combines a dead front cabinet door with a clear window, limiting access to the panel while providing single button operation of the reset and silence functions • Programmable AC trouble relay • Built-in synchronization for appliances from AMSECO®, Gentee, Faraday, System Sensor®, and Wheelock® • Programmable date settings for Daylight Saving Time • Clock source setting options for 50 Hz, 60 Hz, or internal (uses the panel's internal clock) Specifications Operating Voltage: 24 VDC Primary AC: 120 Vrms @ 60Hz, 2A Total DC Load: 6 Amp Current Draw: Standby: 140 mA Alarm: 460 mA Flush Mounting Dimensions: Height: 24.75" (62.9 cm) Width: 14.5" (36.8 cm) Depth: 3-7/16" (8.73 cm) with 5/8" protruding Overall Dimensions: Height: 26-3/8" (67 cm) Width: 17-3/16" (43.66 cm) Total Depth: 4" (10.16 cm) Operating Temp: 32° to 120° F (0° to 49° C) Humidity: 10 - 93% noncondensing Optional Accessories • SK-5235 LCD Remote Annunciator • SK-5217 10 Zone Expander (2 max. per system) • SK-5280 Status Display Module (8 max. per system) • 7181 Fire Zone Converter • 5220 Direct Connect Module • 5824 Serial/Parallel Printer Interface Module SK-5208 • SKSS Downloading Software • Plex-2 Door Option Listings and Approvals • UL Listed • CSFM Listed • MEA approval 429-92-E Vol. XIII RECEIVED MAY 2 9 2013 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER ,, � ..�... ,.� .. aew ;�parF�,yrFeFlq• y..,. _?.,6. _.. .�:1R^y: •- . r .. . s - Model 5208 Fire Alarm Control Panel with Digital Communicator Engineering Specification The system shall contain a fire alarm control panel to supervise and operate heat and smoke detection devices, manual fire alarm devices, alarm notification devices and visual annunciators. The system shall also be capable of monitoring for sprinkler supervisory and water flow conditions. The system must have a built in UL listed fire communicator that can be enabled/disabled as needed on a per job basis. In addition, the system will sound alarms locally for purpose of evacuation. Telephon 2 Class A (Style D) or Class B (Style B) Initiation Circuits 8 Class B (Style B) Initiation Circuits SILENT This document is not intended to be used for installation purposes. We try to keep our product information up-to-date and accurate. We cannot cover KNIGHT all specific applications or anticipate all requirements. All specifications are 19 subject to change without notice. For more information, contact Silent by Honeywell Knight 12 Clintonville Road, Northford, CT 06472-1610 Phone: (800) 328-0103, Fax: (203) 484-7118. www.silentknight.com 2 I Connect )n-Site Programming 'rogrammable =orm C Relays Votification 4ppliance Circuits 5235 Remote Annunciators SBUS Devices 5280, 5217, & 5824 MADE IN AMERICA FORM# 350318 Rev C © 2010 Honeywell International Inc. SK-5?3 Remote Annnnc ia- rI Program and Operate the SK-5203 FACP from a Distance with the SK-5235 Remote Annunciator. The SK-5235 remote annunciator provides remote annunciation for the SK-5208 Fire Alarm Control Panel. The SK-5235 performs all system operations. It also provides trouble and alarm information and can be used for programming. The SK-5208 can support up to six 5235 Remote Annunciators. When the system is normal and receiving AC power, the power LED is on and all other LEDs are off. Other LEDs turn on as the conditions occur. Users identify themselves to the control panel by entering a code on the annunciator. When a user presses a button, the annunciator piezo beeps and the LCD prompts the user to enter a code or other relevant information. Features • 2-line 16-character LCD display • Indicates Trouble, Alarm, Supervisory, and System Status conditions with LEDs and LCD display • Each SK-5235 is individually supervised by the SK-5208 FACP • Up to 6 per SK-5208 FACP • Operation and appearance comparable to the control panel's on -board annunciator • Can be wired up to 1500 ft from FACP • OPR operator's key ships with SK-5235, this key can be used to perform user operations, but will not open the control panel SK-5235 Remote Annunciator Specifications Operating Voltage: Current Draw: Standby: Alarm: Dimensions: Width: Height: Depth: Operating Temp: Maximum Wiring Distance: door Approvals • MEA 429-92-E • CSFM 7165-0559:137 • UL Listed Ordering information 24 VDC SK5235 Remote Annunciator 30 mA 50 mA 7-3/16" (18.26 cm) 5" (12.7 cm ) 1-1/8" (2.86 cm) 32• to 120• F (0• to 49• C) 1500ft Compatible Products SK5208 Fire Alarm Control Panel SILENT" KNIGHT 0 by Honaywaall www. BevanSecurity.Com SK-5235 Remote Annunciator Engineering Specifications The contractor shall furnish and install where indicated on the plans, the Model SK-5235 Remote Annunciator. Module shall be of a LCD type with a 2X16 display. Module shall be capable of remote programming as well as providing alarm, trouble information along with resetting of alarms and silencing of trouble and alarm conditions. Module ID shall be programmed with a 4 position DIP. The control shall be capable of supporting up to 6 supervised SK-5235. Module shall be designed to mount on a dual gang electrical box with 18 gauge to 14 gauge wire. SMENT This document is not intended to be used for installation purposes. We try to MADE IN AMERICA )LIGH'T keep our product information up-to-date and accurate. We cannot cover all FORM# 350321 Rev B 1/07 specific applications or anticipate all requirements. All specifications are Copyright © 2007 Silent Knight ty subject to change without notice. For more information, contact Silent Knight HOAWWOM 7550 Meridian Circle Suite 100, Maple Grove, Mn 55369-4927. Phone: (800) 328-0103, Fax: (763) 493-6475. www. BevanSecurity.Com FIRE PREVENTION i ', Serving Brief: Edmonds 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT SNOHOMISH CO. - FIRE Mountlake Terrace,and Everett, WA 98208 ❑ BRIER S ❑BRIER I Town of Woodway Twhww FireDistrictlorg Phone (425) 551-1200 ❑ O AYe [1 MNTLAKE TERRACE _DISTR Fax(425) 551-1272 ❑UNINCORPORATED LOCATION: 110 James Street FREQUENCY 365 I STATION & SHIFT 17 D .{ BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Financial Cntr & Condos PHONE: 4256408660 SCHEDULED DATE DUE 12101/11 1' MAILING 110 James St UFIR ► 500 1;202 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: LCNI HOME PHONE: 4256408660 ACTIVE I EMERGENCY-1: Meeks, Mike HOME PHONE: 4257758158 CURRENT ••- KEY ACCESS-2: FAX 425-64t1-8665 HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS El LICENSE � PERSON CONTACTED: / G, f-J � � INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 4- 2�1 FIRE AS 1f07 FA 1107 FD LkRx FE 10 14 SYSTEMS: `,�S /(� f� � ANNUAL HAZARDS FO ND AND'I,0CATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS &I44 �L 2 /� 2 !� f LPL G 3 All G L- 4 0 A, /z_ e Ll �LX 16 — 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS 1 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION RANTED TO: AL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED;/t� PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 y INSPECTOR: �'�I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: z DATE: 1 DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS r 1 Ol� 15 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: a .2 O 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 i 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 8 4 8 DATE: DISPOSITION: LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO a FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY Seattle Fire Department Confidence Test Report 206-386-1448 Confidence Testing Officer 206.615-1068 (fax) 206-233-7219 Red Tag Hotline STANDPIPE SYSTEM Certification Given (One System per Report) RED ❑ 1 YELLOW ❑ WHITE X CONFIDENCE TEST X I REPAIRS 1 ❑ Occupancy Address: 110 James St. #100 Occupancy Name: One Ten Bldg. Responsible Person First & Last Name: Alice Elekes Phone Number: 425-640-8660 Responsible Person 110 James Street #100 Responsible Party Address, City, State, zip: Edmonds, WA 98020 E—Mail Address Date of Inspection: Inspection 5 Year 11-30-11 Frequencyrrype: Identification Number: 1 System Location: Garage Level Testers Name SFD SCP Certification (Please Print): Cliff Wilcox Number. SCP-W-01200 Central station monitoring? Yes X No O Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes X No d Company Name: Guardian System Make: Silent Knight -_ System Model: SEATTLE FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: 11-30-11 Corrected By: Cliff Wilcox (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) SFD Certification Number: SCP — W-01200 Backflushed FDC, new gauges and replaced pumper caps. This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Seattle Fire Department Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the wner/Manager for corrective action. ,�buiilding Signature of Tester: Cliff Wilcox _v dihone # 206-232-8569 Building Representative (signature) Standpipe System Page 1 of 4 !► � 1 - It;��i�l 1 � 11!r����IGl�1l!i�t�i%�—i«�����It��l�� � � _tZ� 1534 1 st Ave South Seattle WA 98134 Office: (206) 232-8569 Cell: (206) 571-0375 Fax: (206) 340-6100 P" To: �/1[// ' Nj�i lJ J f l 0 From: 0LU M t71, ) 6rpG Fax: 77LI Pages: (, � Phone: /f Date: 97 1G Fie: I KJ� 02 (i CC: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply Please Reply Columbia Fire SPYINKEEE fT3TCM SENVICE B REPAIR The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Seattle Fire Department Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General ' 1. Is there 300 GPM flow at roof through each riser? N/A X Yes ❑ No❑ 2. All fire department inlets and outlets equipped with approved plugs or caps (1/8 Yes ❑ No ❑ inch pressure relief hole in caps)? N/A 3. Piping between fire department connection and check valve is currently hydro -tested? Yes X No ❑ 4. All control valves left in open position (except normally closed valves)? Yes X No ❑ 5. Pumper connections are not obstructed? Yes X No ❑ 6. Water flow switches operate properly? N/A X Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. Fire pump(s) start from roof flow? N/A X Yes ❑ No ❑ 8. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed? Yes X No ❑ 9. Are there hose cabinets in the building? Yes ❑ No X 10. Is the building sprinklered? Yes X No ❑ 11. Standpipe Classification 12, Class I Standpipe? Yes ❑ No X 13. Class II Standpipe? Yes ❑ No X 14. Class III Standpipe? Yes ❑ No X 15. Hose cabinet and/or sprinkler PRV testing form for each system? N/A X Yes ❑ No ❑ 16. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No X 17. System gauges replaced every 5 years or calibrated? Yes X No ❑ Class 1 18. Hydro -tested 150 psi or 50 psi greater than head pressure for 2 NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ hours D Standpipe Only) 19. All outlet valves and hose threads checked and have 2 W Cap w/1/8" hole? Yes ❑ No ❑ 20. Was 25 psi air test conducted? Yes ❑ No ❑ 21. Standpipes have 12" wrench clearance? Yes ❑ No ❑ Class II 22. Hydro -tested 150 psi or 50 psi greater than head pressure for 2 ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ hours: N/A No 23. Are all hoses, valves and controlling nozzles in good condition? Yes ❑ No ❑ 24. Have flow tests been conducted at highest level for at least 30 seconds to make Yes ❑ ❑ sure nozzle will work at pressure available (50 gpm at 35 psi minimum)? No 25. Standpipe has 12" wrench clearance? Yes ❑ No ❑ 26. Have controlling valves been tested to verify that pressure regulating valves operate Yes ❑ No ❑ properly (not to exceed 100 psi Tip pressure)? Class III 27. Hydro -tested at 150 psi or 50 psi greater than highest Operating N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ pressure? 28. Was 25 psi air test conducted? Yes ❑ No ❑ 29. All outlet valves and hose threads checked and have 2 %" Cap w/118" hole? Yes ❑ No ❑ Standpipe System Page 2 or 4 i J CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (425) 771-0215 FIRE DEPARTMENT �'St. 1 age FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY LOCATION: 110 James Street i BUSINESS NAME: Edmonds Financial Cntr & Condos PHONE: 4256408660 MAILING 110 James St ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: LCM HOME PHONE: ,4256408660 EMERGENCY-1: Meeks Mike , HOME PHONE: 4257758198 I', KEY ACCESS-2: FAX 425-640-8665 HOME PHONE: -- �a FR EIWENCY STATI0 y & t0IFT I SCHEDULED 12101/10 DATE DUE ► . UFIR ► 509 1 i202 � J ACTIVE PERSON CONTACTED: / w� INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: S7 , Jpu. �-Zo2-•- /TI J I � FIFE AS 1/07 FA 1/07 Fa Lkt3x FE I SYSTEMS: ANNUAL HAZARDdS�FOUNJD,,sA-��N,D LOCIjTIO N /�COMMUNICATIO� V � /_!�p VKJ� � ram/ /'�1�1- ca/T_(J YI `� �/`� 2 1 lift ! �f K ✓� v1 V %S%� 3 4 - 5 ��� vl G � ENTER CODE ONLY ONCE ► �/ e r ;IOALA�TIONQCODE /YI L-1 C(j / Q4 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: PERSON CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: DATE: VIOLATIONS � 5 �- --- — --- - Z.—._ 8 � 3 7 1 4 B LETTER NEEDED F-i YES T_111 EXTENSION GRANTED TO: 6` J- ' - PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT DATE: - RETURN RECEIPT_... I RECEIVED DATE:- FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE. PERSON -! CONTACTED: INSPECTOR: DATE: CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: - ._ -__-, CODE I SECTIONS` I DISPOSITION: 1:� 4 VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: di' 1 INSPECTOR: �.1�1�L L[ T 2 - 4 DATE: (p �� VIOLATIONS 1 5 (� 2 �W 6 5 3 ®._ 7 6 _ 7 4 8 V 8 LETTER NEEDED i_] YES rI NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY Exterior Research & Design, L.L.C. Building Science and Envelope Consultants Clemens J. Rosell, P.E. clemensr@exdesign.com Direct: 206.826.0912 June 26, 2003 Projece,One Ten James Street - Edmonds Evaluation of Cracks on Reinforced Concrete Walls and Beams I. Findings visited the site on June 25 to investigate the cracks on the concrete beams and walls at the parking garage. The building footprint has the shape of a trapezoid; the north side is the base of the trapezoid and has a length of 144 ft; the east and west sides are perpendicular to it. The east side has a length of 107 ft and the west side a length of 185 ft. The building has three stories supported on a post -tensioned slab at the first floor. This post -tensioned slab is 7" thick, supported on reinforced concrete beams that run N- S and are typically spaced 23' on centers. The parking garage occupies the daylight basement, under the post -tensioned slab. The north, south and east sides of the garage have concrete walls throughout their length, and the west side is fairly open, with 16' long concrete wall at the north end and a 27' long concrete wall at the south end. The upper floors and roof are framed with TJI joists supported on steel beams and steel columns. The two uppermost stories have an "L" shaped footprint, with the legs along the west and north sides. The concrete walls of the garage retain soil on the exterior side. The amount of soil retained varies with wall location, and is typically 2' — 6" for the south wall and full height for the north wall. I could observe that the concrete walls have diagonal cracks. These cracks repeat every six to ten feet, and are all inclined in the same direction at each wall. The thickness of the cracks typically varies from hairline to 1 /32". The cracks go through the thickness of the wall and can be seen on both the interior face and the exterior face of the wall. It could be observed that there is some fluid seeping through the lower portion of the cracks. Because the walls retain soil, it is possible that the observed fluid is water that was present in the soil. I could observe that the concrete beams have cracks oriented perpendicular to the span of the beam. These cracks are typically vertical throughout the exposed beam section, and hairline in width. These cracks are observed close to the location of the columns, within 30" to each side of the column. No cracks were observable closer to the middle of the beam span. The project architect was Butterfield Design Group, 400 Dayton Street, Edmonds, WA 98020, and the architectural drawings are stamped by Robert Butterfield, Architect. The project engineer was Voelker Engineering Inc., 1121 Market Street, Kirkland, WA 98033; the structural drawings are stamped by Charles Voelker, P.E.. The architectural drawings are dated I 1 / 16/95, with some sheets revised up to 8/22/96; the structural drawings are dated 10/23/95 with revisions up to 2/26/96. RECEIVED TERD PEHMI r COUNTL_'Ir3 2412 7ch Ave W 9 Suite 101 • Seattle, WA 981 19 • Voice (206) 467-0054 9 Fax (206) 467-5840 Lee Smart Cook One Ten James - Edmonds Page 2 of 2 The drawings show that the concrete walls are typically 8" in thickness and reinforced with #5 @ 12" on center ea. way. The beams are 45" wide and 17" deep. They are typically reinforced with 3 - #7 bars at the top and 5 - #7 bars at the bottom, with additional top bars at the column locations and additional bottom bars at mid -span locations, plus post -tensioned tendons; they have #4 stirrups @ 12" on centers, with additional stirrups at the column locations. These stirrups are open at the top. 2. Conclusions and Recommendations The distribution and orientation of the cracks.in the walls strongly suggest that their formation is related to lateral load, most probably seismic events. Concrete shear walls rely on a combination of the strength of the concrete and the strength of the reinforcement to resist lateral forces. These cracks are detrimental to the lateral load capacity of the wall, and I recommend that the strength of the wall be restored by ropairing the cracks with epo y grout applied by injection. With regards to the cracks in the beams, the fact that the cracks are strictly vertical suggests that their formation is either related to bending action in the beam, or to shrinkage in the concrete. Taking into account the distribution and orientation of the cracks in the beams, it appears unlikely that these cracks are a result of shrinkage in the concrete. If it were shrinkage cracks, they would appear randomly distributed throughout the beam span. The distribution strongly suggests that their formation is directly related to lateral load, most probably seismic events, and that they occurred because tensile forces in the lower region of the beam exceeded the tensile stress capacity of the concrete, and the tensile forces were then resisted by the steel reinforcement. The prevalent location of the cracks close to the column location is an indication that these cracks could have formed during stress reversal cycles in the beams, which occurred during seismic events. Because the calculations for the strength of reinforced concrete beams do not take into account the tensile contribution of the concrete, there is no reduction in the bending capacity of the beams due to the presence of these cracks. No repair appears to be necessary. Should you have any questions, please call. Respectfully Submitted, Exterior Research & Design, L.L.C. Building Science and Envelope Consultants b Yeens J. WR o Ass e I lP.E. 29933 ANIOM At. W!RES . 06/28/05 M_DAD� HVtA# Certified Accredited Accreditation TL I" Lab No. 200563-0 2412 7th Ave W • Suite 101 • Seattle, WA 981 19 9 Voice (206) 467-0054 • Fax (206) 467-S840 Exterior Research & Design, L.L.C. Building Science and Envelope Consultants One Ten James Street Condominiums 10 James Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Project #40356.02L Prepared for: Steven. J. Jager, Esq., Lee Smart Cook Date of Initial Issuance: 25 November 2002 Date of Revision: 16 July 2003 Photo I — Overview (North Elevation) One Ten James Street Condominiums, Edmonds 2412 7tn Ave W 9 Suite 101 9 Seattle, WA 981 19 9 Voice (206) 467-0054 • Fax (206) 467-S840 FAN . ; � , �., ,./�tr... s � t r � s '' TC � fir' t � - ° '' _ 0 ER-408 One Ten James Street Condominiums Summary Scope of Repairs Page 3 of 44 Photo 4 — Typical 'Building Envelope' Transitions MIAMI HVLA# .' Accredited TERD Accreditation TL199 Certified Lab No. 200563-0 2412 7th Ave W • Suite 101 • Seattle, WA 981 19 • Voice (206) 467-OOS4 • Fax (206) 467-5840 ER-408 One Ten James Street Condominiums Summary Scope of Repairs Page 5 of 44 All work shall be carried out within regular business hours, defined as 8:00 a.m. — 4.30 p.m., unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties. The Contractor may stage work thirty minutes prior to the agreed start time. Weekend and holiday work shall be carried out only upon written consent of the parties. The Contractor shall request approval of such work not less than 72 hours prior to the commencement of weekend or holiday work. g. The General Contractor shall guarantee all materials and workmanship for a period of one year from the date of final acceptance by Owner. h. The Contractor shall verify'the material compatibility of all waterproofing components (e.g., sealants, closed cell backer rod, self -adhering membrane, etc.) used in conjunction with other waterproofing components. The Contractor shall maintain onsite a<Job Ucfin-ethree ring binder that shall include all bid documents, Field Directives, Changes Orders, Submittals, Safety and Fall Protection Plan documents, Accident Reports, Site Inspection Reports, and Communications with the permitting departments. Further requirements for maintenance of the Job Log are specified in Section 2.1 of this Scope. j. The Work shall be carried out within an agreed period of time that shall be established within the Contract document. The Contractor shall acknowledge time and completion are of the essence. k. The Contractor shall establish a written Safety and Fall Protection Plan, a copy of which shalF be maintained onsite within the Job -Log, complyingon with Section 2.1. The Ctractor ---- -- --- -- - - --- - shalltake all necessary measures to communicate the plans to all employees and subcontractors. All subcontractors shall acknowledge in writing the receipt of the Plan and shall acknowledge the obligation to convey the information within the Plan to all employees. I. The Contractor shall provide to the Owner and the Contact Administrator emergency telephone numbers and contact names for use, if required, outside of normal business hours. m. The Bidding Contractor shall acknowledge the obligation to have an individual on call to respond to emergencies should they arise at any time during the course of the Contract period. n. The Contractor shall institute compliance with all relevant City, County, State and/or Federal ordinances, laws and regulations including but not limited to: • Provisions for disposal of construction materials and demolition debris; • Provisions for electrical safety; • Provisions of OSHA regulations and similar State and local requirements for safety in the workplace, including provisions for safety and fall protection programs; and NVLAoM®DARE Accredited TERD Accreditation TL199 Certified Lab No. 200563-0 2412 7th Ave W 9 Suite 101 • Seattle, WA 981 19 9 Voice (206) 467-0054 9 Fax (206) 467-S840 ER-408 One Ten James Street Condominiums Summary Scope of Repairs Page 9 of 44 Section 2.1 The Work — Project Record (Job Log) Requirements This Section includes administrative and procedural requirements for maintaining Project Record (Job Log) documents. a. job Log documents required include any Contract Drawings, Schedules, Approved Shop Drawings, Record Drawings, Specification and addenda, Manufacturer's Installation Instructions, Product Data Sheets, Change Orders and other modifications to the Contract, Field Test Reports, Field Directives, Correspondence between Contract Administrator and Contractor, and/or Observation Reports that may be used or produced during the course of the repairs. b. Store record documents and samples in the field office apart from the Contract Documents used for construction. Do not use job Log documents for construction purposes. Maintain record documents in good order and in a clean, dry legible condition. Make documents and samples available at all times for the consultant's inspections. c. Protect job Log documents from deterioration and loss. Provide access to job Log documents for reference by Contract Administrator during normal working hours. d. Label each document, "Project Record, job Log Copy" in 1'/2" high print. e. Keep all Record Documents current with construction progress. Do not permanently conceal any work until required information is recorded. f. Mark Record Drawings to show the actual installation where installation varies from that originally specified or detailed. Require individual or entity that obtained record data, whether individual or entity is installer, subcontractor, or similar entity, to prepare the marked -up Record Drawings. Show field changes of dimension and details. Show changes made by Change Order or Field Directive. Show details not on original project details. Give particular attention to information on concealed elements that cannot be readily identified and recorded later. Accurately record information in an understandable drawing technique. Record data as soon as possible after obtaining it. Record and check the markup before enclosing concealed installations. g. Submit one copy of Scope of Repair, including addenda and contact modifications. Mark copy to indicate the actual product installation where installation varies from that indicated in original Scope of Repair, addenda, and contract modifications. Give particular attention to information on concealed products and installations that cannot be readily identified and recorded later. Mark copy with the proprietary name and model number of products, materials, and equipment furnished, including substitutions and product options selected. Note related Change Orders, Record Drawings, and Product Data, where applicable. ` AAIA►U • DADE WtAo Accredited Accreditation TLI" Certified lab No. 200563-0 2412 7th Ave W • Suite 101 • Seattle, WA 981 19 • Voice (206) 467-0054 • Fax (206) 467-S840 ER-408 One Ten James Street Condominiums Section 3.0 The Work - General Summary Scope of Repairs Page 14 of 44 a. Remove and/or protect landscaping, decks, and interiors adjacent to work areas, as necessary to erect staging and/or scaffolding as required to complete this Scope of Repair. Protect all adjacent structural components from damage. At completion of repairs specified in this Scope, restore all landscaping to existing conditions. It shall.be the decision of the contractor to choose the appropriate staging to provide access to the work. b. Erect sufficient staging to access all areas and phases of the Work in a safe manner. The Contractor shall provide adequate supervision and monitoring of and the staging erection. Monitor points of attachment to the existing structure and document any damage to the exterior structure during the erection process. At completion of work, remediate any cladding damage resulting from the installation and securement of the staging, restoring the exterior cladding to the existing undamaged conditions established at the commencement of work and/or providing new cladding as specified within this Scope of Repair. The Contractor shall document existing conditions prior to erection of staging. Such documentation shall be maintained in the job Log in compliance with Section 2.1, and a copy forwarded to the Contract Administrator. c. As necessary to carry out the work specified within this Scope of Repair, carefully remove and store for reinstallation all exterior landscaping planters, furniture, mechanical equipment, bibs, brackets and/or similar items, equipment and appurtenances. Protect all adjacent structural components from damage. At completion of repairs specified in this Scope, restore all stored components to existing conditions in compliance with industry standards and applicable Codes. d. Ensure weather protection of all exposed repairs and adjacent water sensitive components. At all times, provide sufficient weather protection and safety equipment to protect ongoing and finished work. The Contractor shall provide a safe working environment. e. Protect all interiors, as necessary to conduct the specified repairs. Advise designated Owner's Representative of related exterior work 48 hours prior to commencement to allow for protection and removal of interior furnishings, by others. If required to protect finishes or to protect the interior environment, install temporary interior partitions shall be constructed, at a minimum, of dimensional lumber and minimum 6-mil polyethylene. Avoid mechanical attachment to the floor where possible. f. Institute daily and final site cleanup. At completion of work, clean all windows and doors affected by construction dust and debris and ensure weep holes remain open and clear. Properly and regularly dispose of all demolition and non -demolition materials and debris. Dumpsters shall be located only where approved by the Owner's Representative. g. At all -times, during the period of repairs, ensure there is -adequate access/egress to habited settions of the- structure tomeetcurrent Fire Code requirements within the jurisdiction. I MIAMI . 2DIDE NYLAo _ Accredited Accreditation TLI" Certified Lab No. 200563-0 2412 7th Ave W • Suite 101 9 Seattle, WA 981 19 • Voice (206) 467-0054 • Fax (206) 467-S840 1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 8701 8704.15 ARTICLE 87 - FIRESAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION OR DEMOLITION OF A BUILDING SECTION 8701 - SCOPE Buildings undergoing construction, alteration or demolition shall be in accordance with Article 87. SECTION 8702 - PERMITS For permits to conduct asbestos -removal operations regulated by Section 8707, see Section 105, Permit a.4. SECTION 8703 - APPROVALS Approval of the safety precautions required for'buildings being constructed, altered or demolished may be required by the chief in addition to other approvals requi-r"edfo'specific operations or pro- cesses associated with such construction, alteration or demolition. EXCEPTION: Buildings designated as Group R, Division 3 or Group U do not require approval of safety precautions. SECTION 8704 - FIRESAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION 8704.1 General. Buildings under construction shall be in ac- cordance with Section 8704. 8704.2 Access Roads: Fire department access roads shall be es- tablished and maintained in accordance with Section 902. EXCEPTION: When approved, temporary access roads of a width, vertical clearance and surface which provide access for fire de- partment apparatus are allowed to be used until permanent roads are in- stalled. 8704.3 Water Supply:' Water mains and hydrants shall be in- stalled and operational in accordance with Section 903. EXCEPTION: When approved, a temporary water supply for fire protection is allowed to be used until permanent fire -protection sys- tems are installed. 8704.4 Fire Protection. B 8704.4.1 General. During the construction of a building and un- B til the permanent fire -extinguishing system has been installed and B is in service, fire protection shall be provided in accordance with B Section 8704. 8704.4.2 Fire extinguishers. Fire extinguishers shall be pro- vided for buildings under construction when required by the chief. The number and type of extinguishers shall be as required by the chief, and the type of extinguisher shall be suitable for the type of fire associated with the hazards present. B 8704.4.3 Standpipes B B 8704.43.1 Where required. Every building four stories or B more in height shall be provided with not less than one standpipe B for use during construction. Such standpipes shall be installed B when the progress of construction is not more than 35 feet (10 668 B mm) in height above the lowest level of fire department access. B Such standpipe shall be provided with fire department hose B connections at accessible locations adjacent to usable stairs and B the standpipe outlets shall be located adjacent to such usable B stairs. Such standpipe systems shall be extended as construction B progresses to within one floor of the highest point of construction B having secured decking or flooring. On each floor there shall be provided a 21/2-inch (63.5 mm) valve outlet for fire department use. Where construction height re- quires installation of a Class III standpipe, fire pumps and water main connections shall be provided to serve the standpipe. 8704.4.3.2 Temporary standpipes. Temporary standpipes are allowed to be provided in place of permanent systems if they are designed to furnish 500 gallons (1893 L) of water per minute at 50 pounds per square inch (345 kPa) pressure with a standpipe size of not less than 4 inches (101.6 mm). All outlets shall not be less than 21/2 inches (63.5 mm). Pumping equipment sufficient to provide this pressure and volume shall be available at all times when a Class III standpipe system is required. 8704.4.3.3 Detailed requirements. Standpipe systems for buildings under construction shall be installed as required for per- manent standpipe systems. 8704.5 Combustible Debris. Combustible debris shall not be accumulated within buildings. Combustible debris, rubbish and waste material shall be removed from buildings as often as practi- cal. Combustible debris, waste material and trash shall not be burned on the site unless approved. 8704.6 Motor Equipment. Internal -combustion -powered con- struction equipment shall be used in accordance with the follow- ing: 1. Equipment shall be located so that exhausts do not discharge against combustible material, 2. When possible, exhausts shall be piped to the outside of the building, 3. Equipment shall not be refueled while in operation, and 4. Fuel for equipment shall be stored in an approved area out- side of the building. 8704.7 Heating Devices. Temporary heating devices shall be of an approved type, located away from combustible materials, and attended and maintained by competent personnel. 8704.8 Smoking. Smoking shall be prohibited, except in those areas approved. When required by the chief, a suitable number and type of NO SMOKING signs shall be posted. 8704.9 Cutting and Welding. Cutting and welding operations shall be in accordance with Article 49. 8704.10 Flame -producing Equipment. The use of torches or flame -producing devices for the sweating of pipe joints shall be in accordance with Article 49. 8704.11 Flammable Liquids. The storage, use and handling of flammable liquids shall be in accordance with Article 79. Ventila- tion shall be provided for operations utilizing the application of materials containing flammable solvents. 8704.12 Open -flame Devices. Open -flame devices and other sources of ignition shall not be located in areas where flammable materials are being used. 8704.13 Asphalt and Tar Kettles. Asphalt and tar kettles shall be located and operated in accordance with Section 1105. 8704.14 Temporary Electrical Wiring. Temporary electrical wiring shall be in accordance with Section 8503. - - - --- -- - - ---------- - --- 8704.15 Building Access. When required by the chief, access to buildings for the purpose of firefighting -shall - be provided. Con- 870.15 71997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE structron material shall not block access to buildings; hydrants of 8706.4 Cutting and Welding. Demolition operations involving ll�� _ cutting and welding shall be in accordance with Article 49. file appl_iances.` _ - — - --_-- — --- - -- -- --- 8704.16 Emergency Telephone. When required by the chief, 8706.5 Burning of Combustible Waste. Combustible waste telephone facilities shall be provided at the construction site for material, trash and rubbish shall not be burned at the demolition the purpose of emergency notification of the fire department. The site, unless approved. Accumulations of such material shall be re - street address of the construction site shall be posted adjacent to moved from the site as often as necessary to minimize the hazards the telephone together with the fire department telephone number. therefrom. 8704.17Fire-protection Plan. When required by the chief, a 8706.6 Fire Watch. When required by the chief for building de - fire -protection plan shall be established. molition which is hazardous in nature qualified personnel shall be SECTION 8705 — ALTERATIONS OF BUILDINGS 8705.1 General. Alterations of buildings shall be in accordance with the Building Code, applicable provisions of Section 8704, and Section 8705. 8705.2 Fire -protection- Systems.. When the building is pro- tected by;fire-p otectioq systems, such systems shall be main' tained operational at all times during alteration. When alteration requires modification of a portion of a fire - protection system, the remainder of the system shall be kept in service. When it is necessary to shut down the entire system, a fire watch shall be kept on site until the system is returned to service. 8705.3 Means of�Egress. Required means of egress components shall`ti maintained in accordance with Article 12.. _EXCEPTION:._ Approved temporary means of egress system or- r facilities. — — - -- ' 8705.4 Fire -resistive Assemblies and Construction. Fire - resistive assemblies and construction shall be maintained in ac- cordance with Section 1111. SECTION 8706 — FIRESAFETY DURING DEMOLITION 8706.1 General. Demolition of buildings shall be in accordance with Section 8706 and, where applicable, Sections 8704 and 8705. 8706.2 Automatic Sprinkler System. When a building to be demolished contains a sprinkler system, such system shall not be rendered inoperative without approval of the chief. 8706.3 Fire Hose. Suitable fire hose, as required by the chief, shall be maintained at the demolition site. Such hose shall be con- nected to an approved source of water and shall not impede fire department use of hydrants. provided to serve as an on -site fire watch. The sole duty of fire - watch personnel shall be to watch for the occurrence of fire. SECTION 8707 — ASBESTOS REMOVAL 8707.1 General. Operations involving removal of asbestos or asbestos -containing materials from buildings shall be in accord- ance with Section 8707. EXCEPTION: Section 8707 does not apply to the removal of asbestos from: 1. Pumps, valves, gaskets and similar equipment. 2. Pipes, ducts, girders or beams which have a length less than 21 linear feet (6400 mm). 3. Wall or ceiling panels which have an area of less than 10 square feet (0.93 m2) or a dimension of less than 10 linear feet (3048 mm). 4. Floor tiles when the duration of work can be completed in less than four hours. Group R, Division 3 Occupancies. 8707.2 Notification. The chief shall be notified 24 hours prior to the commencement and closure of asbestos -removal operations. The permit applicant shall notify the building official when as- bestos abatement involves the removal of materials which were used as a feature of the building's fire resistance. 8707.3 Plastic Film. Plastic film which is installed on building elements shall be flame resistant as required for combustible dec- orative material in accordance with Section 1103.3.3. 8707.4 Signs. Approved signs shall be posted at the entrance, exit and exit -access door, decontamination areas and waste -dispo- sal areas for asbestos -removal operations. The signs shall state that asbestos is being removed from the area, that asbestos is a sus- pected carcinogen and that proper respiratory protection is re- quired. Signs shall have a reflective surface and lettering shall be a minimum of 2 inches (51 mm) high. cs�— $v 1 i-0 ,11-Z CPAC`5�'_r 1-252 Date: April 7, 1997 To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshal Subject: Plan Review - Edmonds Financial, 110 James Street, Suite 101 The fire department has the following comment: The new wall creates a problem with the sprinkler head coverage. The two existing heads must be moved so that they are a minimum of four inches from the new wall. (N.F.P.A. 13, 4-2.1.5.2.). Two new heads,must be provided on the opposite side of the new wall to maintain required coverage. 0 EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL JAN-13-98 TUE 15:19 AMS Y Alarm Monitoring Service, Inc. January 13, 1998 Edmonds Fire Department 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 FAX NO. 2063644136 TV4I . o�V P. 01 Re: Notice of disconnect of monitoring of a required fire alarm system. N.W. Comm. & Alarm P.O. Box 6277 Lynnwood, WA 98o36 Per: Jennifer Funk has requested a disconnect of monitoring services Provided by Alarm Monitoring Service, Inc. for: ( Edmonds -Financial Center \110 James St. Edmonds,-WA--98020 effective January 13, 1998. n� LA) . GA M S � zS -7-75- 44,5"Zc1 0 362-4482 1(OW)562-4ag4 WazNg1on Toll free P.O. BOX 65027 waffle, WA 98155 �(0 g60 <mr.r arq.� W-ANUMT �� USTfO P. 02 RECEIVED JAN I n..1998 AUTOMATIC COVER SHEET EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. DATE JAN-13-98 TUE 15:19 T0; FAX #; 4257710208 FROM: AM FAX #; 2063644136 02 PAGES WERE SENT (INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE) Alarm Monitoring Service, Inc. January 13, 1998 Edmonds Fire Department 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RECEIVED JAN 16 1999 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. Re: Notice of disconnect of monitoring of a required fire alarm system. N.W. Comm. & Alarm P.O. Box 6277 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Per: Jennifer Funk has requested a disconnect of monitoring services provided by Alarm Monitoring Service, Inc. for: Edmonds Financial Center 110 James St. Edmonds, WA 98020 effective January 13, 1998. 401"11-11, 362-4482 1(800)562-4464 Washington Toll Free P.O. BOX 65027 Seattle, WA 98155 Cen11N TtNiOn or n, U� LISTED DcYiGg�-5 -,���� r� c$ 6-111. 0unil- ct-� Jap,, G �iAz sw� 5OL4)4-61-J D it I -Tr ntr Nn 890.199 CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HAI_t_ MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0215 • FAX (206) 771-0208 FIRE DEPARTMENT EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCK BOX AUTHORIZATION LETTER This is to authorize Tdm (LCM.) for the: (agent) at 110 James Street Building Name) (Building Address) to purchase a Lock Box for Fire Department use for emergency access. 1. Assigned key # 2. Location of Supra Box Givea brief description of where the Lock Box will be mounted in relation to the main entrance. The Fire Depart- ment recommends that the box be located just.to the right of the main door, if possible. 3. Key(s) identification/access to: Identify each key with a brief description of what the key will unlock. Keep a minimal number of keys in the box. The Fire Department should have easy access to: Main Entrance Electrical Room Mechanical Room Sprinkler Room Alarm Panel Fir apartment Authorized Signature NOTE: A copy of this authorization., noting the assigned key number, must be returned to the Edmonds'Fire Department. 08/05/93 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Date: October 27, 1996 To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: John Westfall, Fire Inspector Subject: Temporary Occupancy: 110 James Street, Financial Center Fire Department has approved temporary occupancy for Edmonds Financial Center, First floor only, on October 24. Additionally, T.I. approvals were made for four suites on first floor. Fire extinguishers had been called out with general for mounting within tenant spaces. cc: Fire Marshal File City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention Date: MEMORANDUM October 24, 1996 To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshal Subject: Edmonds Financial Center, 2nd & James St. Re: Final Sprinkler Plan Submittal. The latest letter ( date stamped Oct. 23, 1996 ) from Tri-State Plumbing, Inc. addresses all of the I.C.B.O. comments on system design satisfactorily. Item #2 The concern continues to be protection from freezing of the wet sprinkler piping in the unheated garage area. We will monitor the installation and keep the building official advised. EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL • 0 Date: October 22, 1996 To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshal Subject: Edmonds Financial Building, 2nd & James ST. Carbon Monoxide Ventilation Fan The contractor is asking for direction on where to locate the sensor on the garage ceiling. Because the exhaust fan is located on the south wall adjacent to the man door, exhausting air will only be drawn from the south west one third of the basement which will leave about two thirds of the space non -vented. Given the limited effectiveness of the fan location I recommend that the sensor be placed in the center of the space. Installation of insulation above the ceiling in the basement garage. The owner has installed a wet sprinkler system in the unheated garage, and intends to protect the pipes from freezing by the -installation of insulation, between the suspended ceiling grid and the sprinkler pipes. The distance from the ceiling grid to the piping appears to be approximately one inch, which will cause the insulation to be compressed and lose most of its ability to insulate. Although the design can work, if the insulation has room to expand, I do not feel that a minimum of 40 degrees can be maintained as required by code, on this installation. Possible solutions: 1. Lower the ceiling grid to allow the insulation to expand. 2. Install automatic heat tape on the pipes. 3. Convert the system to a dry system. EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL • 1� Date: October 21, 1996 To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshal Subject: Edmonds Financial Center, 2nd &James St. I conducted the following tests on October 21,1996 at 2:00 PM: Automatic sprinkler system (dry) in the basement A nrQ oved Automatic sprinkler system (wet) in the basement Approved Automatic sprinkler system (wet) first floor Approved Automatic sprinkler alarm connection to fire alarm system Approved Fire alarm system connection to a monitoring agency Approved AMS monitoring Seattle, phone 362-4482 Account # 523140. OCCUPANCY RECOMMENDATIONS: Complete installation of all elements of required exits on the first floor: Complete all door installations Repair drywall penetrations above ceiling grid, install ceiling tiles. Remove tripping hazards and all exit obstructions. /EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL 0 • MEMORANDUM Date: October 2, 1996 To: Jeannine Graf Building Official From: John Westfall, Fire Inspector Subject: Edmonds Financial Center Was snatched yesterday morning by Tom Blake and the project staff of 110 James yesterday morning to reiterate FD rgrmts for temporary occupancy. Tom told me I was referred by you. No changes from our earlier meeting in Paul Mar's office were made., Essentially: All exits free and unobstructed, First floor exit lights and emergency lighting in place; in service, Sprinkler system fully in service and monitored, One hour fire separation at end of 2nd and 3rd floor corridors, Fire separation (2x5/8" type X) vertically between floors 1 & 2. 1 also had mentioned at a minimum, corridors in 2nd and 3rd floors need be hung and taped but not finished. In retrospect there are horizontal and vertical separations already in place to the first floor. In retrospect this may be a building department issue and I am outside my pervue? Let me know if I need to change FD "temporary" requirements regarding 2nd/3rd floor corridors. City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention ..�-�,.-T� r,.-. �T�-.�-fir .Tn t..�-, � ��..-r � .-.•sr.-. �.�_ ... T � � � ... �_ 7-IFPF r, V I C---A 6 C o=7 L4 arc. c,,C C o - 3 �l c E�� i�z �' t n) 5' t G n.s p�'irT7i 7t:� KZ-''� A�'�S �i9v-� c C Gc9-r&J X �USiNL�S /u� -I A-) .^�w1�c , /��'✓J i►r , W 7K (/vim L `'� / / --- /| -- '--' -T --------'--------�---- ' - --'----- r----'------'--'--'--- -'- - ||. ~^ ' !} ^ - 7 ' | � ! '-- ^ s) 6AtV PC ^f6--k`hZcl'vl' ?4(o,0— 7t) r-, Ar- 144-'T 1ft T' � B C' �,/7,cfl,✓n�-��—" (? �D GF�. ��-t .Ot.r�vrs� ��� �sz---cam } AiW /0/1 -7 /f O-r� ITID Alz-� eA-f-4y D I c� r Scc�v rt- t -✓ e7 � f �krctp, - to '-' c 7— /%-6 /s. r-L-VSW- 7'C-:-s7- Fob-,,' L)V-C-Z-.�Ae Cie r c-rf` rwig / Li-UA _ E-K fT ffl Gam" l N -sue c�rCe�(l 47" ' 1 LL 0 E'7Z��7 U,-' OE-v►cC-T s *4-1 (- t/v S6V- k7cc—(,,Lz .,Q r t' Rzqv� s 7-►-Uo 57o i Tb`T - S . w . � Al, 49 Gas) /ko--,o ALL Gtzr— g i Dvs�f F, L t-- Ncu-e,e-s L&-U c.�+r✓ r- �S o nJ g2.g•�� Lc �� 4-Y -cx) `ems i t N �2j-66 4-4� p l g -31cc ,-Vv��-- �"`, / / o E-s s 7— F64— Z) A � qr� F+ /=c' ',2^1'r5 RAP— Pli4P 4z 4f— (/t'VG 7 ) (N (T- f.l G a�� N�, ��+-i 0.2 - L� 1 N S ✓+ �r 5 P ¢.ram r r� i �, cc o � � � ►-��.� (c�►r��-- F,.�-.�� o,� �{-e, "o csF 2 =-F s � �(, car -lam r vc�2 S N �,�. O,CJ ®r.✓��2- cco--� �: ccs�✓5 �-✓c�7�-�c*�V. ft'S � � ,,• cv�i�� j Ago pwt-S-- )N CCurn„ C LuSv �{i%'-O 14 T.T wI �� , Z 00 — FLIL4 f-TEs"T Fe9,5�-- (��r%i��l _ ��".S�� �-� �wst� F�2 ��I� �►7�3'- JAPr6,Pi T 5 --P �s r- f-°z-%4— DOV-2.5, s wlLL Bc Itj Pu4<:E ru1*A) Dtcr-(svA,- (jN6C1✓+'-tC -- �US1 3 S D i lkeN�d� , �� PVL4 - B i r.1 y,,) Ceti ",K- P-9 9-6 forz- Pam& PVL5� A/O ocRc vP4�jc h I,J fSA, 50q6jT-(NO7T a6l-p vt`� /4�i ^2 c,�e 40 6C,,4) 4 Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM September 29, 1996 Jeannine Graf, Building Official Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshal Edmonds Financial Center, 2nd and James St. After review the fire department has the following comments referencing the September 23,1996 plan review letter from I.C.B.O.: 1. Item #2 Verification of wet pipe heating, 40 F must be maintained to prevent freeze ups during inclement weather. 2. Item #16 System review in conjunction with tenant improvements. 3. Item # 17 Contractor will make revised submittals. 4. Item # 18 Contractor will make revised submittals. 5. Item # 19 Contractor will make revised submittals. 6. Item #20 Contractor will make revised submittals prior to installation. 7. Item #21 The underground contractor for the project should comment on this item. The plans as submitted are substantially complete and the permit can be issued. The outstanding issues will be resolved prior to final approval for occupancy. EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL International Conference of Ailding- Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112th AVENUE, N.E., SUITE B-300 • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 • (206) 451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN RON PERKEREWICZ, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF KITSAP PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN THOMAS R. THOMPSON, C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL BROOMFIELD, COLORADO SECOND VICE-CHAIRMAN ALAN P. OLSON, R.A., C.B.O. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PHOENIX, ARIZONA IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN JAN P. GASTERLAND, C.B.O. BUILDING CODE OFFICER ST PAUL, MINNESOTA THOMAS C. ANDERSON BUILDING OFFICIAL HOPKINS, MINNESOTA FRED B. CULLUM BUILDING OFFICIAL BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA PAUL T. EDGERTON MANAGER, BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON ROGER R. EVANS, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SERVICES SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH FRED HERMAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA KENNETH G. LARSEN, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA DAN R. NK:KLE, C.B.O. CODES ADMINISTRATOR LAKEWOOD, COLORADO RONALD L NIENABER, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA JOHN E. PIERCE, C.B.O. BUILDING OFICIAL PLANO,TEXAS LARRY W. RICHARDS, C.B.O. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR GLENDALE. ARIZONA RAIMAR W. SCHULLER, C.B.O. DIRECTOR, BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA September 23, 1996 Jeannine Graf Building Official 250 5th NE . Edmonds, WA 98020 SEP 2 y 1996 Plan Check:. 7595, Recheck No. 1 Project: Edmonds Financial Center (Sprinkler Review) Dear Ms. Graf: OFFICES OF JERRY J. BARBERA, P.E. SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER KATHLEEN CURRY, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER GREG GRIFFITH REGIONAL ENGINEER CHARLES J. WILLIAMS, P.E., S.E. SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER We have reviewed the sprinkler system plans and calculations resubmitted by TriState Plumbing Inc. And stamped/sealed by Stan Amos for the above named facility. The system has been designed to provide a density of .15/1,500 sq ft for the parking area, .10/1,500 sq ft in the office area, and for a four head design in the residential area. We will be addressing only the comments left outstanding, all other comments have been taken care of. 2. Verification of wet pipe space heating. This comment has not been addressed. 16. Verification of system design in accordance with NFPA 13R/UBC Standard 9-3. For your determination. 17. Hydraulic calculations We have been notified by the contractor (see attached 8-1/2 x 11 plan dated September 21, 1996) that the residential floors have undergone substantial revisions that are not shown on resubmitted plans. Contractor will make revised submittal for revised calculations and plans. RON K. WATTS, D.B.D. 18. Heads shown more than 10' away from walls We have been notified by CHIEF OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION ANCHORAGE, ALASKA the contractor (see attached 8-1/2 x 11 plan dated September 21, 1996) that the residential floors have undergone substantial revisions that are not shown on PRESIDENT resubmitted plans. Contractor will make revised submittal for revised calculations JON S. TRAW. P.E. and plans. Main Office: 5360 Workman Mill Road 0 Whittier, California 90601-2298 0 (310) 699-0541 Plan Check 7595, Recheck No. Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds September 23, 1996 Page 2 19. Provide an additional set of hydraulic calculations for a remote area consisting of four heads in unit 6. We have been notified by the contractor (see attached 8-1/2 x 11 plan dated September 21, 1996) that the residential floors have undergone substantial revisions that are not shown on resubmitted plans. Contractor will make revised submittal for revised calculations and plans. 20. 2 x 4 headers should be approved by structural engineer. Contractor included hanger detail sheet from truss manufacturer that shows wood trapeze as a 4" x 4" member in lieu of 2" x 4" header. The 4" member would be acceptable if installed in accordance with the truss manufacturers detail sheet. If contractor wishes to utilize a 2 x 4 wood trapeze, the structural engineer should review the 2 x 4 header for its ability to support the weight of the water filled pipe plus 250 pounds applied at the point of hanging in accordance with UBC Standard 9-1 2- 6.1.3. 21. The underground plan does not have sufficient detail for review. Plan should include depth of bury, thickness of piping, etc. Although the plans are still not revised, the contractor's letter indicates that the piping will have a minimum 36" of cover and will be installed in accordance with NFPA 24. This should be verified. Our headquarters accounting department in Whittier, California will send you an invoice for this plan reviewing service based on 3 hours of professional time ($225). I am returning all data and plans to you. However, to facilitate the plan review process, I am sending a copy of this list directly to the designer. If you wish me to do the recheck, please instruct them to REVISE THE PLANS and specifications, and RESUBMIT them with a letter that indicates which sheet or detail the corrections may be found, and to return the check prints. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. V ly yours, Charles J. Willi , S.E. Senior Staff Engineer, SCSO spm Enclosure c: TriState Plumbing Date: To: From: MEMORANDUM September 28, 1996 Jeannine Graf, Building Official Gary L. McComas, Fire Marshal Subject: Edmonds Financial Center, 110 James Street, Fire Alarm System Fire Department Comments: C �U�. S Sheet A-1 Designer should identify symbol ITC] at grids B-2 and F-4. Add heat detectors to storage rooms. S' '�� S Q C' Sheet A-2, E-1 Install a sign on the electrical room; Fire Alarm Control Panel -- UJ 1 N 0-0-1 Install detectors in the following locations: Janitor closet a. Electrical room j Provide an exterior bell \0 I C�Q-e EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL MEMORANDUM DATE -6 (1 /f b REPORTED BY JDA-4--. OF SUBJECT {� ADDRESS: CONCERNS/ Al f--7,J HAZARDS: SIGNED FOLLOW-UP: Cam. To'J D 2a— ��c'avn� s FoL-��°� RC--sT- C-r- A-S PA�7- j--7)L w ti B c�h J o&J SIGNED City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention (r.) Y.- TE PLUAING, INC. / FIRE PROT*TION Established nineteen hundred fifty -eve International Conference of Building Officials 2122 112 h Ave. NE, Suite B-300 Be!ievue WA 98004 Attn: Charles 1. Williams 4e: Pian Review No.: 7591 Edmonds Financial Center fames Si. 6& 2"d Ave. i dmonds %VA FIRE SPRINKLER REVIEW Dear Mr. Williams, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR LIC. #TRISTI * 245NZ Cow 04 41,5t, RecF'Nso r�13 � 0 1 199E ?GWlj cout r', (b/�(/� it We have received your letter for the plan review of Edmonds Financial Center dated July 22, 1996. This letter is to inform you that Tri- State has complied and/or revised the plans to conform to your requirements as referenced to your letter and listed below: 1. The sprinkler spacing in the parking garage level has been re -spaced to comply with Central ELO- 0L-1 °k '.isting- sheet 2 of 5. '2 Tne owner of Edmonds Financial Center is responsible for maintaining a minimum 40 :F. above. 'tttp insulated ceiling in.the parking.garage.to-prevent.the.frre_sprinkler piping-from:freezing= sheet 2 of-5` 3. All dry fire sprinklers will be installed into tees with plugs to prevent damage to the dry sprinkler. See the note on sheet 2 of 5 left center for symbol information. 4. The grid flow data requested is provided for the most demanding remote area per NFPA #13 6-2.3 1:�j- see hydraulic calculations. S. The plans and calculations have been revised per the review letter- sheet 2 of 5 and hydraulic :,aicalations. 6. A detail of the elevation and compliance with the sprinkler spacing requirements of NFPA #13 are iocated on sh; et 2 of 5 left center. ? The concealed spaces farmed by the TJI joists with sheet rock installed directly to the underside of % the TJ1 conforms to NFPA # 13 4-5. 1.1 Exception #4. The largest area of volume formed by the joist channels is 55cubic feet from grid line 5-8 from C-G-- sheet 3 of 5 8. The sprinkler has been re- spaced- sheet 3 of 5. y. The sprinkler has been re- spaced- sheet 3 of 5. 10. The sprinkler has been re- spaced- sheet 3 of 5. 13420 N.E. 16th Street • Bellevue, WA 98005-2308 • (206) 643-3830 • FAX (206) 747-3041 :nu>ve: BOARD OF DIRECTORS 71RECi T DEVELOPMENT FIT =O. WASHINGTON FIRST VICECHAIgMM '"SBLpl�p � c.ao. 'ROOMRELO. COI ORApO :CONO VICE-CHAIRMAN > �� ON. R.A. CALL. SERVICES DIRECTOR ARIZONA EDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN L P. GASTERLAND, CJW ALDING CODE OFFICER 3T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 40MAS C. ANDERSON BLULatNG oFFK�AL 10PKINS,IMNNESOTA FRED B. CULLUM BUILDING OFFICIAL ILINGAME. CALIFORNIA -AUL T. EDGERTON ER ENFORCEMENT, BUILDING ANp CODE UJVER. WASHINGTON �3REOF BUILDING SERVICES LT LAKE CRY. UTAH FRED HERMAN F BUILDING OFFICIAL ) ALTO. CALIFORNIA � etilLa� AND ►1�OUSING i VISTA, CAUFpgrpp I R. NK:KLE. C.B.O. _S ADMINISTRATOR WOOD.COLORADO I L- NIENABER. C.S.0. OR OF INSPECTIONS 3ROVE, MINNESOTA E. LUNG � C.B.O. aAL i RICHARDS, C.B.O. SAFETY DIRECTOR IDALE. ARIZONA SCHULLER, C.B.O. LIILWNO OEPARTMENi BEACH. CAUFORNIA 0 Internation Conference of Buis' --------------------- Ong Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112th AVENUE, N.E., SUITE B-300 • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 • (206) 451-9541 July 22, 1996 Plan Review No.: 7595 Project: Edmonds Financial Center Address: James St. & 2nd SPRINKLER PLAN REVIEW Jeannine Graf City of Edmonds Building Official 250 5th N E Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Graff. OFFICES OF JERRY J. BARBERA PE. SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER KATHLEEN CURRY, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER GREG GRIFFITH REGIONAL ENGINEER CHARLES J. WILUAMS. P.E., S.E. SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER We have reviewed the sprinkler system plans and calculations submitted by TriState Plumbing Inc. and stamped/sealed by Stan Amos for the above named facility. The system has been designed to provide a density of .1511,500 sq. ft. for the parking area, .10/ 1,500 sq. ft. in the office area, and for a four head design in the reside The plans do not comply with the Uniform BuildingCode Standard 9-1 FP area. The following items must be corrected. (NFPA 13). 1 The parking garage is protected with a mix of extended coverage d sprinklers, standard dry pendent sprinkles and upright sprinklers. The U.L. li pendent the Central ELO-GB FR extended coverage d g between sprinklers of 12'-6", g dry Pendent requires a minimum spacing The plans show the distance between the row of ELO-GB FR sprinklers and the adjacent row of standard d ers at 9'-6" near grid line "2". Unless the contractor can Providey pendentrinkldocumenta ion fromtely the sprinkler head manufacturer allowing the reduced spacing between extended coverage and standard coverage sprinklers, the spacing between sprinklers in this area should be revised to provide a minimum separation of 12'-6", p WAns.c.e.o. y2.`_ The parking garage is protected -with a wet pipe system located above the', 9LOING INSPECTIONS finished ceiling -of unheated garage area. Verification should be made that the space containing the wet,pipe sprinkler piping is maintained at a minimum of 400F to prevent r sIOENT damage to the wet pipe during cold weather. If the space is not heated, LTRAW P.E should be changed to a d Pipe system. d, the system dry Y - 3. The dry sidewall heads shown connected to the system with what a a 1" coupling should be shown connected to the system with a 1" x 1" x it erwith a Plugged outlet. Main Office: 5360 Workman Mill Road 0 Whittier, California 90601-2298 • (310) 699-0541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN RON PERKEREWICZ, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF KITSAP PORT ORCHARD, WASHINGTON FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN THOMAS R. THOMPSON, C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL BROOMFIELD, COLORADO SECOND VICE-CHAIRMAN ALAN P. OLSON, RJL, C.B.O. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PHOENIX, ARIZONA IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN JAN R GASTERLAND, C.B.O. BUILDING CODE OFFICER ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA THOMAS C. ANDERSON BUILDING OFFICIAL HOPKINS, MINNESOTA FRED B. CULLUM BUILDING OFFICIAL BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA OWN. International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112th AVENUE, N.E., SUITE B-306 • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 • (206) 451-9541 July 22, 1996 Jeannine Graf City of Edmonds Building Official 250 5th N E Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Graff: Plan Review No.: 7595 Project: Edmonds Financial Center Address: James St. & 2nd SPRINKLER PLAN REVIEW OFFICES OF JERRY J. BARBERA, P.E. SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER KATHLEEN CURRY, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER GREG GRIFFITH REGIONAL ENGINEER CHARLES J. VALUAMS, P.E., S.E. SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER MANAGER BUIL�DNERTON AND CODE We have reviewed the sprinkler system plans and calculations submitted by TriState ENFORENT VANCOUVER.WASHNGTON Plumbing Inc. and stamped/sealed by Stan Amos for the above named facility. The ROGER R. EVANS, C.B.O. system has been designed to provide a density of .1511,500 sq. ft. for the parking area, DIRECTORMT LAILDING KE CITY. UTAHVICES .10/ 1 500 S ft. in the office area and for a four head desig n gn in the residential area. FREDHERMAN The plans do not comply with the Uniform Building Code Standard 9-1 (NFPA 13). CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA The following items must be corrected. KENNETH G. LARSEN, C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 1. The parking garage is protected with a mix of extended coverage dry pendent DAN R. CODES ADMIINISSTRATOR sprinklers, standard dry pendent sprinkles and upright sprinklers. The U.L. listing for LAKEWOOD, COLORADO the Central ELO-GB FR extended coverage dry pendent requires a minimum spacing D.B.O. RONALDDIRECT R OF INSPER,ECTIONS DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS between sprinklers of 12'-6". The plans show the distance between the row of ELO-GB p MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA FR sprinklers and the adjacent row of standard dry pendent sprinklers at approximately JOBUILDPIERCE,CIAL 9'-6" near grid line "2". Unless the contractor can provide documentation from the PLANO,TEXAS sprinkler head manufacturer allowing the reduced spacing between extended coverage LARRY W. RICHARDS, C.B.O. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR and standard coverage sprinklers, the spacing between sprinklers in this area should be OLENDALE,ARIZONA revised to provide a minimum separation of 12'-6". RAIMAR W. SCHULLER, C.B.O. DIRECTOR, BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA RONK.WATTS ,C.B.O. 2. The parking garage is protected with a wet pipe system located above the CHIEFLDINGSBUILDING IN DIVISION BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION finished ceiling of the unheated garage area. Verification should be made that the space ANCHORAGE, ALASKA containing the wet pipe sprinkler piping is maintained at a minimum of 407 to prevent damage to the_ wet pipe during cold weather. If the space is not heated, the system PRESIDENT JONS.TAA PE should be changed to a dry pipe system. 3. The dry sidewall heads shown connected to the system with what appears to be a 1" coupling should be shown connected to the system with a 1" x 1" x 1" tee with a plugged outlet. Main Office: 5360 Workman Mill Road 0 Whittier, California 90601-2298 0 (310) 699-0541 q Plan Review No.: 7595 Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds July 22, 1996 Page 2 4. Grid flow diagrams for each remote area must be included with hydraulic calculations to facilitate review of the calculations and plans. Provide a grid flow diagram with flow quantities and directions of flow per NFPA 13 6-2.3 (o) for each remote area. See figure A 6-2.3 (o) for example of proper format. 5. There appears to be an input error in the hydraulic calculations for the parking garage. Calculations are based upon 16' of 2" between nodes 34 and 35 which is incorrect, and do. not include piping between nodes 34 and 36. Additionally, node 29 is shown twice on plans and node 33 is not shown. Plans and calculations should be corrected to accurately reflect the conditions. 6: Details should be provided at ceiling elevation change at grid line "8" to show the dimension between the top of the upright sprinkler deflector and the bottom of the adjacent dropped ceiling. If the upright sprinkler is blocked by the vertical ceiling drop, as determined by NFPA 13 table 4- 4.1.3.1.2, from protecting beyond the edge of ceiling drop, revisions will be required to respace the extended coverage pendents to within 8' of the obstruction (now shown at approximately 10'). 7. The first floor office area is current calculated with a 1,500 square foot remote area. U.B.C. Standard 9-1 requires a minimum remote area of 3,000 square feet for building with unprotected combustible blind spaces (TJI space/TJL space) unless these spaces are entirely filled with non- combustible insulation. 8. The sprinkler head on the 1 st floor office C 104 should be relocated to within 7' -6" of the wall. The small room rule from NFPA 13 does not allow spacing exceeding 7'-6" from more than one wall. 9. The sprinkler head on the 1st floor office C105 shown approximately 10' away from wall should be relocated to within 9' of wall. 10. The sprinkler head on the 1 st floor office A 110 shown approximately 10'-6 " away from wall should be relocated to within 9' of wall. 11. The remote area for the office area does not include sufficient sprinkler heads flowing on the branch lines to conform to NFPA 13 requirements for the remote area. The length along the branch line should be equal to or greater than, 1.211,500 or 46-' 6" . The calculations submitted include a length of approximately 4l' for sprinklers at nodes 8, 9 ,10, and 11. 12. Center to center or cut pipe dimensions should be shown on the cross mains for the 1st floor main piping. 13. The pipe lengths. and fittings used. in the hydraulic calculations for the 1st floor do not match the plans. For example the pipe between nodes 36 and 47, 47 and 50, and between 50 and 53 are calculated with no equivalent footage for fittings but should include three elbows on each pipe length. The pipe between nodes 47 and 50 is calculated at 10' in length while it is actually 30' in length. Plan Review No.: 7595 Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds July 22, 1996 Page 3 Similar discrepancies occur throughout the 1st floor calculations. Plans and calculations should be. corrected to accurately reflect the conditions. 14. There appears to be an input error in the hydraulic calculations for the 1st floor. Two node 62's are shown on the plans. Calculations show flow between nodes 63 and 64, 60 and 63, and 62 and 63 but node 63 is not shown on the plans.. The nodes do not appear to correlate with the piping layout, IE: the pipe between nodes 65 and 68 is calculated 10' of 1 'h" pipe with no fittings but plans show approximately 25' of pipe with six tees. The grid flow diagrams required by NFPA 13 would assist in allowing the contractor to discover these errors prior to plan submittal. Plans and calculations should be corrected to accurately reflect the conditions. 15. The office calculations place node 72 at the top of the riser which does not match the location of node 72 on the plans. 16. Calculations for the two residential floors appear to be based upon NFPA 13R. The attic space is not protected with sprinklers. Verification of system design in accordance with NFPA 13RIUBC Standard 9-3 should be provided with City of Edmonds. Standard building construction trade- offs allowed for.fully sprinklered buildings should not be allowed with the submitted system. 17. The hydraulic calculations cover sheet for the residential floors shows a maximum coverage for sprinklers of 324 square feet (18' x 18') which contradicts the note on sheet 4 of 5 noting coverage of 20' x 20'. Hydraulic calculations are based upon a minimum flow from the sprinklers of 10 GPM which does not correspond to any listed spacing shown on the sprinkler head data sheets. Hydraulic calculations should be corrected to increase the minimum flow to 13.5 GPM unless sprinkler head locations are revised to decrease coverage to a maximum of 18' between heads and 9' from walls. 18. All heads shown more than 10' away from walls (based upon revised calculations) should be relocated to a maximum of 10' from any wall. For example the head at node 8 is shown approximately 11'-6" from the wall to the south and the head in the same unit is shown approximately 1 l' away from the entry door wall. 19. Provide an additional set of hydraulic calculations for a remote area consisting of four heads in unit 6. 20. 2 x 4 headers for hanging piping should be approved by structural engineer. NFPA 13 requires trapeze members to be steel pipe or angle iron. 21. The underground plan does not have sufficient detail for review. Plan should include depth of bury, thickness of piping, etc. 22. The plans should include the same information that is shown on the hydraulic data nameplate for each remote area. Plan Review No.: 7595 Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds July 22, 1996 Page 4 Our headquarters accounting department in Whittier, California will send you an invoice for this plan reviewing service based on 4 hours of professional time ($300). I am returning all data and plans to you. However, .to facilitate the plan review process, I am sending a copy of this list directly to the designer. If you wish me to do the recheck, please instruct them to REVISE THE PLANS and specifications, and RESUBMIT them with a letter that indicates which sheet or detail the corrections may be found, and to return the check prints.. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Very truly yours, QQrles illi s, S.E. Seattle Conference Services Senior Regional Engineer pkw cc: Tristate Plumbing i To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: John Westfall, Fire Inspector Subject: Edmonds Financial Center: 110 James T.I.s Fire Department has following comments: 1. Portable fire extinguisher locations and note added to partition plan. 2. Corridor doors beyond south entrance open the wrong way(?). 3. Note that (B) is the only tenant space not provided with illuminated exit sign. cc: Fire Marshal Gary McComas Plans Examiner Ann Bullis City of Edmonds So Office of Fire Prevention REPORTED BY �� OF 07 1 i c v SUBJECT? 7 L{ 7 - 30 ADDRESS: /(,) CONCERNS/ HAZARDS: All-7 I SIGNED FOLLOW-UP: 2-) H7 -37 H, ' 17 ` I N10 DEsc 'ice Prime r ,MGM r4 "'`r`L I SIGNED City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention s —jM-rzC- I r-65, ou l- /3'(ps,' 66 1 3 2— z `%a DA Zone C/F S.E. 1/4, SEC. 23 T.27N., R.3 E.W.M.. 202 BNR7e-ff"? PUGET gONNO • o . • • 0 uNo�R+atr�R •4wRK • so 400 300 20Q_ 110 0 , W"lv1 -.506 r, PIER 4l: se to ry Frrr /ccure It /,/ eo•w.,os LJ SMoIhM� ST. to•a3 til, WILDLIM Rc� 890 194 BARBARA FAHEY 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 88020 • (206) 771-0200 • FAX (206) 771-0208 MAYOR POLICE DEPARTMENT • A STATE ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY CITY OF EDMONDS TO Recipient's Fax Number '7 4% . 1� % j FROM j� DATE TRANSMITTED //�i 7,VP � If there are any problems during transmission, please call: Police Department 771-0200, extension Fire Department 771-0215, extension 3!o- Municipal Court 771-0210, extension NUMBER OF PAGES 3 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The documents accompanying this facsimile transmission contain information belonging to the City of Edmonds. This information may be confidential and/or legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmittal sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified -that disclosure, copying, distribution, or the use of the contents of this transmitted information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please notify us immediately by phone at the above listed number. EPD310 1 /96 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 000 CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT I C) p Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering 8g0-19 December 20, 1995 Mr. Marty Spadafora Land and Construction Management Post Office Box 100 Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Edmonds Financial Center @ 110 James Street, Plan Check #95-187 Emergency Egress Windows After consulting with the City Attorney, it has been concluded that an interpretation regarding the atrium equivalency of a one -hour fire corridor with a smoke removal system is not the appropriate administrative action to take to resolve this matter. Local amendments to the Uniform Building Code (UBC) that may result in a less than minimum performance standard or objective, must be formally brought before the State Building Code Council pursuant to RCW 19.27.074(1)(b). Even with a favorable ICBO interpretation on this matter the City must still obtain State Building Code Council approval prior to implementation. The State Building Code Amendment process is extremely long and complicated and the City is not willing to sponsor this action at this time. Rather, the UBC currently provides for modification or alternate design methods as outlined in Section 104.2.7 Modifications, and Section 104.2.8 Alternate Material, Alternate Design and Methods of Construction, which may be utilized by an applicant. As described in these code sections, the applicant provides documentation that practical difficulties of the specific project prevent compliance to the code. Section 104.2.7 states that: "A special individual reason must be specified that makes the strict letter of the code impractical and that the intended modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the code and that the proposed modification does not lessen any fire -protection requirements or degree of structural integrity." And, Section 104.2.8 states that the Building Official may approve an alternate design or method of construction, provided: "that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of this code and that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in this code in suitability, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety and sanitation." • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Mr. Spadafora Page 2 December 20, 1995 It is the intent of the code to place the full burden of proof on the applicant who makes such a request for modification or alternate design. Sufficient evidence must be submitted to substantiate any claim that may be made regarding materials, use, design or equipment in the proposal. Once the City receives a formal written proposal indicating the appropriate building code section under consideration, complete with backup information, it shall be reviewed and a final written determination issued. The owners of the building may want to consult their own private attorney regarding possible liability issues associated with such a modification or alternate design proposal to the City on a life -safety matter. The Building Division is in receipt of revised architectural plans for the Edmonds Financial Center dated December 18th, 1995 which show the subject R1 sleeping rooms changed to office which do not require emergency egress windows. Please be advised, UBC Sections 1203.2 and 1203.3 require minimum light and natural ventilation for all habitable rooms (office is considered habitable space). At this time the use of the office rooms comply to Section 310.4 for access and exit facilities�and emergency escapes however, they do. not comply to Section 1203.1, 1203.2 and 1203.3 for natural light and ventilation. Also, the corridors have been changed to "atriums" and the City cannot concur with this designation. The corridors as shown do not meet'Atria requirements of UBC Section 402 and plans.must be changed to reflect a minimum one -hour fire rated corridor system complying with UBC Section 1005.7. As we have stated before, the City understands your time constraints with regards to obtairiing a building permit to satisfy your lender; however, as you know, life -safety issues are fundamental to ensure the safety of the occupants of the building. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 771-0220. Thank you, . 6 fo " X/-ZV Jeannine L. Graf Building Official cc: City Attorney Fire Marshal . 890 19C5v DATE: TO: FROM: RE: CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 775-2525 December 18, 1995 Jeannine Graf, Building Official Gary McComas, Fire Marshal W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney Emergency Egress from Sleeping Rooms LAURA M. HALL MAYOR MEMORANDUM Enclosed please find a memorandum from my partner Carol Morris regarding emergency egress windows from sleeping rooms. If Jeannine, as Building Official on behalf of the City, makes an "interpretation" outside of the State Building Code Amendment process the City could be held strictly liable for violation of the Code. As Carol notes, the most preferably process would be for the City to sponsor an amendment to the statewide 'building code. In addition, a local residential amendment based upon the unique "environmental aspects" of view and its impact on building: design may be possible. Finally, as an interim measure, we recommend that any request in the interim be submitted as a "modification for alternative design" pursuant to UBC Section .104.2.7: I will be out of the office' from December 19 through December 28. • I suggest that if you have questions. in the interim, please feel free to call Carol. She is very knowledgeable in`this area. After my return; the three of us can sit down and. discuss a request to the State Building .Code Council. You may remember how time consuming the process was to deal with the Meadowdale area. cc: Ms. Carol Morris WSS119478.1M/F0006.900.000/B0006. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 15, 1995 TO: Scott Snyder FROM: Carol Morris RE: Emergency Egress Windows from Sleeping Rooms Request for City Attorney Opinion dated 12/14/95 Edmonds Building Official Scott, as I understand the Building Official's question, she would like to know whether the Fire Marshall can request an interpretation of the Building Code from the Building Official, which interpretation would then be used to vary from the UBC provisions relating to emergency egress. The City can adopt local amendments to the Building Code, but the Building Official apparently desires to make this interpretation outside of the code amendment or the Board of Appeal process. Local Amendments to Uniform Building Code The City may amend the Uniform Building Code, but the amendment cannot result in a code that is less than the minimum performance standards and objectives contained in the state building code. RCW 19.27.060(1). (Local residential amendments to chapters 1, 17 or 34 of the UBC do not need to be submitted to the Council. This question does not involve any of these chapters.) An amendment affecting a single family or multi -family residential building is not effective unless approved by the building code council under RCW 19.27.074(1)(b). Local residential amendments submitted to the Council should be based on: (1) climatic conditions that are unique to the jurisdiction; (2) geologic or seismic conditions that are unique to the jurisdiction; (3) environmental impacts such as noise, dust, etc., that- are unique to the jurisdiction; (4) life, health, or safety conditions that are unique to the jurisdiction. WAC 51-04-030. Because the "interpretation" proposed in the Building Official's memo of December 14, 1995, does not involve any issue unique to Edmonds, the local amendment process is probably not applicable. However, the City could propose that the ICBO consider the issue as part of a state-wide amendment. WAC 51-04-020. Fire Marshal's request for an interpretation. There is no procedure in the UBC for the Building Official to render an "interpretation," which would presumably be applicable to all building permit applications subsequently submitted to the City. Because there is no procedure, there are no standards to guide the Building Official's decision on an "interpretation." An "interpretation" would probably differ from the modification or alternative design procedures in the UBC because it is proposed by the City, rather than the applicant. This means that the burden of proving whether or not the "interpretation" actually meets the intent and purpose of the code would likely be borne by the City, not the applicant. Building Code Modification Process. The Building Official may "modify" the provisions of the UBC i individual cases, "where there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions" of the UBC. UBC Sec. 104.2.7. The Building Official must: first find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and that the modification is in conformance with the intent and purposes of this code and that such modification does not lessen any fire -protection requirements or any degree of structural integrity. Id. The details of the action granting the modification are required to be recorded and entered in to the City's files. Id. This recording of the modification would allow another applicant to review the Building Official's decision to determine whether the modification would apply in a subsequent situation. Building Code Alternative Design Process. The Building Official may also approve an alternative design or method of construction, provided that the building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the provisions of this code and that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in this code in suitability, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability, safety and sanitation. UBC Sec. 104.2.8. Sufficient evidence or proof must be submitted to substantiate any claims that may be made. Id. Again, the details of any action granting approval of an alternate must be recorded and entered into the City's files. Liability As you know, the threshold determination in a negligence action is whether a duty of care is owed by the defendant to the plaintiff. Taylor v. Stevens Cy., 111 Wn.2d 159, 163, 759 P.2d 447 (1988). To be actionable, the duty must be one owed to the injured plaintiff, and not.one owed to the public in general. Id. Under the public duty doctrine, no liability may be imposed for a public official's conduct unless it is shown that "the duty breached was owed to the injured person as an individual and was not merely the breach of an obligation owed to the public in general." Id. The Washington courts have held on numerous occasions that building codes do not impose a duty upon local governments to enforce the codes for the benefit of individuals. Id., 111 Wn.2d at 164. Therefore, the state building code's building permit and inspection requirements "impose a duty which is owed to the general public as a whole." Id. at 166. However, if the injured plaintiff can show the existence of an exception to the public duty doctrine, liability may be imposed on the local government. id. The failure to enforce exception applies where "the public agent has knowledge of a statutory violation, the agent fails to take corrective action, and the plaintiff is within the class the statute was designed to protect." Coffel v. Clallam Cy., 58 Wn. App. 517, 521, 794 P.2d 513 (1990). This exception is construed narrowly. Atherton Condo Ass'n. v. Blume Dev. Co., 115 Wn.2d 506, 799 P.2d 250 (1990). If the City Building Official were to issue an "interpretation" which allowed a variance from the provisions of the UBC, where no such procedure exists and no local amendment of the UBC•has been adopted through the proper procedures,'' the City would have "knowledge of a statutory violation" in every application approved by virtue of the "interpretation." Whether or not the "interpretation" actually involves the necessary corrective action (or meets the intent and purpose of the code) would probably be a factual question to be resolved with regard to each application. There is no case law on this issue to clearly demonstrate that the City would or would not have liability in the above situation, but because the portions of the code involving adequacy of fire egress are involved, the City should be extremely cautious. Application of an unauthorized, unofficial "interpretation" which varies from the code on a standard which relates to inherently hazardous conditions could easily implicate the failure to enforce exception described above. The procedures for "modification" or "alternate design" authorized by the code are significantly different because they require that the applicant propose such modification or alternate, and also bear the burden to prove to the City that such conforms to the requirements in the applicable sections of the code. In addition, the procedures require that the Building Official individually review each application under the proposed modification or alternate design in order to determine whether to grant approval. This reduces the danger posed by uniform application of a modification or. alternate to all developments (which would presumably occur with an "interpretation"), given that the particular modification or alternate may not be suitable under all circumstances. You may be asking whether this individualized determination on a modification or alternate design would trigger the "special relationship" exception to the public duty doctrine. This exception arises where (1) there is direct contact or privity between the public official and the injured plaintiff which sets the latter apart from the general public, and (2) there are express assurances given by a public official, which (3) gives rise to justifiable reliance on the part of the plaintiff. Taylor, supra, 111 Wn.2d at 166. While the first element may be present in a modification or alternate design situation, the second and third are not. The Building Official does not give express assurances to the applicant that the applicant's proposed modification or alternate design will serve as well as the UBC code requirement. It is the applicant making such assurances to the Building Official, and the City merely grants or denies the modification or alternate design. Therefore, the applicant cannot justifiably rely upon the City's approval of the applicant's request if injury or damage results. Of course, if the modification or alternate design actually is suitable for use in all applications, the City should propose the same as a state-wide amendment. Under this scenario, the City would be immune from liability under the public duty doctrine for its enforcement of the properly adopted amendment. CAM119385.1M/F0006.9000/B0006. .jjj -- MEMORANDUM DATE Z/� REPORTED BY BY /-- OF SUBJECT ADDRESS: III I N ST CONCERNS/ Q i /�� i ONj HAZARDS: T 3 FOLLOW-UP: =-- 7'0 IN "jzl C,6, , D SIGNED C&PA 10 &Q, Dt T C- 7io'J T pNt I"4,'+2 ) N Cc"-1 01AS . A-�,u� Tt> 06 dM i n60 . S� � a5� .4M8 i E.►-r--�-e�s� c�-�- � r�r� � s `T �-� �i O cQ� � Owl-�-t r•��Z i; n�-t. T S �,.��Q CBM/`2 c� �I�'�`1'3 C4A4-0� C-�IC 1 `1. -73-.1757 g. L-57 SIGNED v City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention CITY OF EDMONDS BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION- COMMERCIAL FEE: $125.00 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, BUSINESS LICENSE DIVISION 121 5' AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PHONE: 425.775.2525 (Cae is kA) OFFICE USE ONLY BL# CustQmer# 02 1 ELIC Year s •Flies Date Pf id TR# Fee Paid Maifed Delete Zito INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete the application in full and attach the required floor plan. Middle initial or name required of all parties concerned. If no middle name, please Indicate by writing NMN. Sign and return application with fee. Please advise of any change In status. New license required if business changes location or ownership. Notification to City of Edmonds required If business closes. Co AST *- 1-}-PRU;otZ BUSINESS NAME BUSINESS ADDRESS 1 O TAfy"S S- 5',tTc 161 0 Street Suite No. Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS Slay_ Street or PO Box Suite No. City, State and Zip Code � BUSINESS PHONE NO. ( : ) _I^I �- ba `t3 WA STATE TAX ID NO. (UBI NO.) k,00Z 3�i�/ BUSINESS E-MAIL BUSINESS WEBSITE PROPERTY OWNER 6F CA !_ L C a V Name Phone Number EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION (For Premise Access in Emergency): � q �� MS S . - - — LA/ D-Lai 2 0 Y-=1:� - - -- - Last Name , A) n) bn - -- - _- First Name MI PhoneNo.___q_"_�.25��� r NATURE OF BUSINESS Co N S74 Lr' t v E N S a .ti, CQ, NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUSINESS SPACE 5. 6 1se TYPE OF BUSINESS - PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE CATEGORY: O CONSTRUCTION O FINANCE, INSURANCE, REAL ESTATE O LANDSCAPE, HORTICULTURAL O MANUFACTURING O NON-PROFIT O RETAIL O SECONDHAND DEALER O SERVICES ❑ WHOLESALE I OTHER E Ng% N e,e (5_W AMUSEMENT DEVICES ON PREMISES? O YES *NO IF YES, TOTAL NUMBER LIQUOR SOLD ON PREMISES?: DYES *NO GAMBLING? DYES �LNO CIGARETTES SOLD ON PREMISES? DYES )b NO FLAMMABLE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USED OR STORED?: O YES V NO IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE LIST OF MATERIALS AND QUANTITIES: PROPOSED OPENING DAY OF BUSINESS -k� 4c N BUSINESS HOURS _7 ,S DAYS OPEN O SUNDAY MONDAY '9,TUESDAY -1%LWEDNESDAY MTHURSDAY 15I FRIDAY O SATURDAY °IA'2ole_ = p PARKING SPACES ON SITE: TOTAL f ACCESSIBLE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES U �1 DOES THE BUSINESS CONTAIN AN ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES? 'VYES O NO PREVIOUS BUSINESS USE AT THIS ADDRESS C.q-' < t o S AUDRESS sued ApLNA."No. CWy.SNleenELp Coda HONE PHONE NO.( W OOL NO.(ORMERS LICENSE N(l) OR OTHER ID NO. OATS OF BIRTH COYAND STATE OF BIRTH COUNTRYOFBIRTH PARTNERSHIP - PARTNEHI NAME Lael not MI ADDRESS Street Apt No.. Mail No. OIy. SOmand Zlp Code HOMEPHONENO(I DOL NO.(ORFARE LICENSE NO.) OR OTHER ID NO. DATE OF BIRTH CRY AND STATE OF BIRTH COUNTRYWORTH PARTNERSHIP -PARTNER] NAME �s mm MI ADDRESS SVeN Apt, No.. Unit No. Gry.SMMettl Zlp Code HOME PHONE NO.I_) DOL NO (ORNERS LICENSE NO.) OR OTHER ID NO. DATE OF BIRTH OWANDSTATEOFWRlH CWNTRY OF BIRTH NAME OF CORPORATION L. 11 /1� ���� p L G f! L(/j -F� /fC FEDRMLTA)COMM blondCORP ADDRESS I�� QQd /.IAIp YLLCX / g c�1 IO 3v PHONE Nd?M-3V— Slona done. APLiunit No. ON.. Slab and Lp s CORPORATE OFFICERS: LetNeme FIM Name NI TWN Dateds DOL-No eN one NP.) or Oder 10 No. LOCALCONTACT,&—/IW S4IOo9O LegNaL Fnl Nana MI TIYe PIIPe No. DOL No. Plwa lle No l totter lO No OV,USEONLY: PLIITRIWO OEPT. OAPPROVE ODISAPPROVE DATE SIGNATURE ZONING CODE CONDRIONALUSEPERNIT COMMENTS WLLDING DEP'.. 0APPROVE 0OISAPPROVE DATE SIGNATURE OCCUPANT LOAD BUILDING PERWBT GCCUPANCY GROUP COMMENTS ' FIRE DEPT. ❑APPROVE 0DISAPPROVE DATE SIGNATURE USSR. COMMENTS POLICE OEPT. 0APPROVE 0DGFPFROVE DATE SIGNATURE COMMEN S Coast & Harbor Engineering, Inc. Incorporated: Washington December 19, 2000 Stock Purchase - HMM, LLC - April 30, 2014 FEIN: 20-0501110 Mailing Address: 111 Wood Avenue South Iselin, New Jersey 08830-4112 Officers (revised by Resolution Mav 1, 2014 Coast & Harbor Authorized Persons (revised by Resolution October 22, 2015) Nicholas M. DeNichilo President & CEO 5/1/2014 Lee W. Abramson Keith J. Howells Barry Singer John Townsend Vice President 5/1/2014 Jon Barbalich Dan Isom David Skipper David P. White Secretary 5/1/2014 Albert N. Beninato David Jurich Gary Snyder Michael Gennaro Assistant Secretary 5/1/2014 Hugo Bermudez Kendall Kilpatrick Christopher Solecki Mark G. O'Connor Assistant Secretary 5/1/2014 Eric Betz Eric Kleinhenz Randy Spence JeffreyT. Hilla Treasurer 5/1/2014 John Bianchini Colin Lawrence Richard Steinhart Michael Broussard Guy Leonard Kevin Stovell Richard Buck Marco Levoyer Steve Stowkowy Harvie Buitelaar Philip LiVecchi Kurt Strobele Members of the Board of Directors Kin Chow Robert Mainberger Cara Strom (Revised by Resolution May 1,2014 coast & Harbor Michael Christensen Stephen Mauss Stephen Taylor Nicholas M. DeNichilo 5/1/2014 Jonathan Davies Michael McCarthy Daniel Tempelis Keith J. Howells 5/1/2014 Nicholas M. DeNichilo Chris Mealing Nicolas Theberge Guy Leonard 4/30/2015 Martin Doble Albert J. Mellini M. Joe Toolson Randall Essex Chris Metzger Martin Tourangeau Scott Fenical Jennifer Moczygemba John Townsend James Forster Philip Murray David VanRensburg Frank Frandina Thomas L. Patterson J. Craig Velasquez Michael Gennaro John Pearson William Veydovec Glenda M. Gibson Billy Perry Michael Vitale Dennis Glass Shane Phillips Richard Walker Tomas Gregor James Poirier James Walsh Paul Heydenrych Stephen Polen Jarrod Ward Keith Higgins Dick Poolman David P. White Nathan Higgins Anthony Purdon Clifford Wilkinson JeffreyT. Hilla Biljana Rajlic Larry Williamson Douglas Hinton Michael Schatz Brian Wolf G. Mark Hitchcock Vladimir Shepis David Wright Arthur Silber LEGEND _ _ = DE310LMOWWT 9101111 Da5TIN6 PARTITION TO RD-WN : EXTE30 PARTIAL HE16W KALL TO GEILIN6 � NEW PARTITION I E16 2-V x RU E16K RE3.ITE IN"FRAFE w"5'-& x SILL W16NT RELITE IN WS RIME. 6L 6LAS6 INSET DOOR KEY NOTES I. wx WP sove t 1 MATED M3,15 RR LODE. TOTAL AREA OF TENANT SPACE - 5,050 SP USE: Engineering firm offices COAST A HARBOR ENGINEERING-2014 110 DAMES BUILORNi 1E O t�11 """ E L l no BAWD •'1' combined into one suite D E I.G, ama1 " mraw, WA aeoao AE0010 1.22.14 REVIEW MOM 1-23.14 REVIEW II M 1-2}14 REVIEW In "T 1.22.14 REVIEW IV on"'�`..° nos ME SPACE PLAN 'SPA Hatch Mott ,�` MacDonald January 25, 2016 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS City of Edmonds City Clerk's Office, Business License Division 121 50' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Chelsea Re: Coast & Harbor Engineering, Inc. Business License Application Dear Sir/Madam: Hatch Mott MacDonald 1 1 1 Wood Avenue South Iselin, New Jersey 08830-41 12 T 973.379.3400 www.hatchmatt.com Enclosed please find the referenced application and our check in the amount of $125.00 representing the processing fce. If you require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Karen Marcotullio Specialist IV - Legal T 973.912.2575 F 973.912-2595 Kareii.marcotullio@batchmott.com Enclosure Cc: Nancy Evans