2021-06-08 City Council - Full Agenda-28901.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
V,j Hv REGULAR MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE,
HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA
98020
JUNE 8, 2021, 7:00 PM
DUE TO THE CORONAVIRUS, MEETINGS ARE HELD VIRTUALLY USING THE ZOOM MEETING
PLATFORM. TO JOIN, COMMENT, VIEW, OR LISTEN TO THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN
ITS ENTIRETY, PASTE THE FOLLOWING INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART
PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE
ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE
AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND.
WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE.
IN ADDITION TO ZOOM, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED
LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION
1. Diversity Commission 2021 Annual Report (25 min)
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
Edmonds City Council Agenda
June 8, 2021
Page 1
1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2021
2. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
8. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Public Hearing regarding Master Permit authorizing Placement of Small Wireless (Small Cell)
Facilities in the City's Rights -of -Way (60 min)
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Waiving Rent Payments for the Chamber of Commerce for July -September 2021 (5 min)
2. Amending ECC 10.80 Salary Commission (20 min)
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
June 8, 2021
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/8/2021
Diversity Commission 2021 Annual Report
Staff Lead: PatrickDoherty
Department: Community Services
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
Chapter 10.65.040 of the Edmonds City Code requires that the Diversity Commission present an annual
report to City Council.
Staff Recommendation
No action required.
Narrative
Attached you will find a PowerPoint presentation that will serve as the basis for the Diversity
Commission's oral report at the 6/8/21 City Council meeting. Diversity Commission Chair, Vice -Chair
and other members will be present.
Attachments:
Diversity Commission Preso to Council 6-8-21
Packet Pg. 3
Edmonds Diversity
Commission
0
a
m
0
a
N
O
N
_
O
y
0
E
0
.N
L
v
r
N
OO
co
_
7
0
V
0
0
N
d
L
a
0
.y
N
E
E
0
ti
.y
L
d
_
d
E
s
0
w
Q
Packet Pg. 4
Diversity Commissioners
Ardeth Weed, Chair Alberto Orejel Malfavon
Dean Olson, Vice -Chair Sarah Mixson
Nikki Okimoto Glaros
Donnie Griffin
Sekou Kone
City Staff
Alison Alfonzo Pence
Melinda Woods
Caitlin Chung, Student Rep
Luke Distelhorst, Council Liai:
Arwen Mahron, Diversity Commission Coordinator
O
a
m
a
N
O
N
C
O
N
E
E
O
•L
Packet Pg. 5
The City of Edmonds Diversity Commission i!
the City's Voice for Diversity, Equity Et
Inclusion in Edmonds
As provided by Chapter 10.65 ECC, the mission of the Diversity Commission is:
To promote and embrace diversity through action, education, and guidance. The Commissioi
seeks to foster an understanding that includes, accepts, respects and appreciates each indi�
member of our community.
To accomplish this, the Commission is empowered to advise and make
recommendations to the Mayor and City Council, and as appropriate to other Boar
and Commissions, as follows:
A. Serve as a commission for city government and the community by providing information,
education, and communication that facilitates understanding of diversity and to celebrate c
respect individual differences.
B. Recommend to the mayor and city council diversity opportunities to promote programs, c
provide guidance to assure an accessible, safe, welcoming and inclusive government and
community.
C. Support, challenge, and guide government and the community to eliminate and prevent c
.forms of discrimination.
Packet Pg. 6
Edmonds Diversity Commission Events 8:
Resources
Accomplishments
► Diversity Film Series
► World Cafes
► Youth Forums
► Fourth of July Parades
► "1 am Edmonds" Project
► Online "Coping with Collective
Trauma" event
► DEI tool kit
No. "All are Welcome" decals
► COVI D 19 Help Flyer translated
into 8languages
Initial concept for Evening Market
Objectives
Indigenous Peoples Day
LGBTQ+ Pride Day
Community leader listening
sessions
Research new events
Renew "I am Edmonds"
0
a
m
0
a
N
O
N
_
0
:E
E
0
.N
Packet Pg. 7
Edmonds Diversity Commission's Policy Work
Accomplishments
Policy recommendations memo
contributed to idea for Mayor's Equity
Et Social Justice Task force
Participated in Judge and Police Chief
interview processes
ADA support for Dayton Et 104; added
captions that City Council adopted
Safe City Ordinance
Initiated movement that led City
Council to change "Columbus Day" to
"Indigenous Peoples Day"
Objectives
Research District -
based Council
positions
Develop ADA
accommodation Et
accessibility
recommendation
0
a
m
0
_
a
N
O
N
_
0
N
0
E
0
.N
Packet Pg. 8
Edmonds Diversity Commission's
Partnership Work
Accomplishments Objectives
Youth Forums C Edmonds
Woodway High School
Equity Toolkit
Sno-Isle Library
partnership providing
books
Community projects
support Et resources
Increased partnerships with
other cities' DEI groups
Hwy 99 Renewal Project
involvement
Expand DEI toolkit to more
business districts
Expand outreach efforts
throughout the community
O
a
m
a
N
O
N
C
O
N
E
E
O
•L
Packet Pg. 9
Edmonds Diversity Commission's Grant
Distributions
Accomplishments
Provided 15 grants for DEI
events/programs
DEI book donations
Contributed to Dr. Martin
Luther King Day Lift Every
Voice Legacy event
► KidStock!
► Sherwood Elementary PSO
DEI Outreach
Objectives
► Continue supporting
community DEI projects
► Partnership with other
cities' DEI projects Et event
Packet Pg. 10
Right Now and Looking Ahead
Recent Work
Responses to local incidents
Highway 99 research,
proposals, research for Council
► First to approve pronoun use
► Disability inclusion
► The City's go -to group for
Diversity, Equity Ft Inclusion
(DEI) discussions
Objectives
Explore Potential for Edmonds Office c
Civil Rights
► Increase City ties to Hwy 99 communit
► Translation recommendations
► Edmonds Youth Commission ties
► Possible anonymous bias/hate complai
process
Maintain/Increase funding for DEI supp
Disability inclusion and recommendati(
1=
O
a
m
a
N
O
N
_
O
N
N
E
E
O
t�
.N
L
Packet Pg. 11
Edmonds Diversity Commission
Thanks go to the City Council, City staff, and
members of the public for making the Diversity
Commission and its programs and activities such a
success in our community!
Packet Pg. 12
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/8/2021
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2021
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
06-01-2021 Draft City Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 13
7.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
June 1, 2021
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Susan Paine, Council President
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Jessica Neill Hoyson, HR Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Mgr.
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Dave Rohde, GIS Analyst
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The
meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas read the City Council Land Acknowledgement Statement: "We
acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors
the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands.
We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual
connection with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely.
4. PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAMATION NATIONAL GUN VIOLENCE AWARENESS DAY
Mayor Nelson read a proclamation proclaiming Friday, June 4, 2021, to be National Gun Violence
Awareness Day and encouraging all citizens to support their local communities' efforts to prevent the tragic
effects of gun violence and to honor and value human lives. He recognized Heather Damron, Vanessa
Stedman, and Jane Weiss who were attending virtually.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked the guests for being here and for the hard work they have done.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 1
Packet Pg. 14
7.1.a
The guests thanked the City for the proclamation. Ms. Weiss said this is the sixth Wear Orange that she has
participated in and she expressed her pride in Edmonds. .
2. 2021 LEGISLATIVE SESSION WRAP-UP REPORT
Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick Doherty introduced Legislative
Lobbyist/Strategist Debora Munguia. Ms. Munguia reviewed:
• Legislative Overview
0 105-day biennial budget legislative session
■ Operating, Capital and Transportation Biennial Budgets Adopted
■ Sine Die April 26, Governor has 20 days to sign bills (May 19)
o Democrats have a 28-21 majority in the Senate and a 57-41 majority in the House.
o Mostly remote session with major themes:
■ COVID Relief
■ Economic Recovery
■ Climate Action and Resiliency
■ Advance Racial Equity
o Big Issues:
■ Capital Gains Tax
■ Working Families Tax Exemption
■ Police Accountability
■ Cap and Trade, Low Carbon Fuel Standard
■ Changing penalties for drug possession (response to Blake decision)
■ Banning open carrying of guns at protests and on state Capitol grounds
■ Wildfire prevention and forest health funding ($130.4 million)
■ Fair Start for Kids Act - SB 5237
Ms. Munguia provided an overview of the 2021-23 Budget
• Operating Budget (ESSB 5092)
o $59.2 billion in state revenue
■ $10.6 billion in federal stimulus funds
■ One-time allocations include:
- $1.1B - Stabilizing K-12 schools (reopening, learning loss, etc.)
- $ 1 B - Public health (vaccine deployment, contact tracing and testing, etc.)
- $658M Extending the state's rental assistance program
- $528M Childcare grants and provider rates
- $500M Unemployment Insurance benefit relief
- $340M Grants to adults unable to access COVID 19 benefits due to citizenship status
- $187M Foreclosure prevention for individuals under 100% area median income
- $170M Family leave during the pandemic
• Capital Budget (SHB 1080)
o $6.3 billion appropriated, $82 million is reserved for a supplemental
■ $258,000 to the City of Edmonds for Edmonds Marsh restoration (LCP)
■ $500,000 for Willow Creek at Marina Beach Park (ALEA)
■ $500,000 for Marina Beach Park Redevelopment (WWRP Local Parks)
■ $250,000 for the Waterfront Center (LCP)
■ $200,000 for the Edmonds Boys & Girls Club planning and upgrades (LCP)
■ $258,000 for the Civic Park Mika's Playground (LCP)
■ $412,000 to the WA State Arts Commission for Creative Districts Capital Construction
Projects (Section 5169)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 2
Packet Pg. 15
7.1.a
■ $175 million for Housing Trust Fund, $174.9 million for other state programs that support
affordable housing and shelter capacity
■ $411 million for grants and loans to improve and expand broadband access
■ $327 million for infrastructure ($129 million for PW Board)
o WRIA 8 Priorities:
■ $52.8 million for Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration
■ $80 million for Salmon Recovery Funding Board
■ $70 million for Floodplains by Design
■ $15.7 million for Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program
■ $100 million for WWRP
■ $6.6 million for ALEA
■ $26.8 million for the Fish Barrier Removal Board
Transportation Budget (SSB 5165)
o $11.8 billion in appropriation authority to maintain current level
■ Transferred $6.5 million from Waterfront Connector project to SR 99 Project
■ Proviso giving City first right of purchase of Unocal Marsh property from State
■ $1 billion from federal ARPA funds, using $400 million for fish passage barrier removal
if allowable
■ $6.9 million for alternative fuel vehicle charging and refueling
■ $5 million for green transportation capital grants to help transit agencies
■ $10 million new funding for Safe Routes to School and Ped/Bike safety programs
■ $4 million for a new cadet basic training class to graduate in June 2023
■ $1 million to WSP to address bills related to police tactics, use of force, etc.
o Both LCFS and Cap and Trade linked to a 5 cent gas tax increase for a transportation revenue
package by 2023. Special session for transportation revenue?
■ Senate "Forward Washington" is a 16-year, $17.8 billion investment plan
■ Includes $22.5 million for SR 99 Revitalization Project
■ House "Miles Ahead" is a 16-year, $22 billion investment plan
Ms. Munguia also reviewed:
• Climate Action & Resiliency
o SB 5126 - Adopting the Climate Commitment Act
o HB 1091 - Establishing a clean fuel standard, joining Oregon, California and BC
■ Referendums filed on both
o SB 5022 - Improving our recycling system and eliminating tons of Styrofoam from our waste
stream
o SB 5253 — If a public works project includes landscaping, at least 25% must be pollinator
habitat to the extent possible.
o HB 1050 - Establishing thresholds to reduce GHG emissions from fluorinated gases and
address refrigerant emissions
o HB 1287 - Preparing for a zero -emissions future by planning upgrades to electricity supply and
charging infrastructure
o SB 5000 — Creates an 8-year pilot sales/uses tax exemption program for hydrogen fuel cell
EVs.
Police Accountability/Justice Reform
o HB 1267
— new Office of Independent Investigations, police use of deadly force
o SB 5051 —
decertification of law enforcement officers
o HB 1054
— police tactics
o HB 1310
— new standards for police use of force
o SB 5066 —
officer duty to intervene
o SB 5259 —
data on use of deadly force
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 3
Packet Pg. 16
7.1.a
o $20M one-time funds distributed to cities related to police reform bills
Housing/Homelessness
o Over $1.7 billion in the state budgets for affordable housing and homelessness
o HB 1277 - New permanent fund source for eviction prevention and homelessness interventions
($100 document recording fee)
o SB 5160 - Right to counsel for low-income tenants facing evictions
o HB 1236 - Eviction reform, no more 20-day, no -cause eviction notices
o HB 1220 - Supports emergency shelters and housing through local planning and development
regulations.
o SB 5287 - Authorizes a 12-year extension of existing 8- and 12-year MFTEs that were set to
expire; qualified residents must be provided with relocation assistance. Establishes a new 20-
year exemption for permanent affordable homes.
o HB 1070 - Expands allowable uses of revenue from local sales and use tax for housing and
related services, adds acquisition of facilities or land.
State v. Blake Decision
o In a 5-4 decision, the state Supreme Court found the state's simple drug possession law
unconstitutional because it didn't require prosecutors to prove a person knowingly or
intentionally had drugs.
o SB 5476 makes possession of drugs such as LSD and heroin a misdemeanor instead of a felony.
It also funds and prepares for a transition to a more treatment -centered system for addressing
substance use disorder.
o The first and second time a person is caught with drugs, officers must refer the person for
assessment and services rather than arresting them.
o A committee of experts will study the issue and make recommendations to the Legislature for
a more permanent approach in 2023.
o $83.5 million in the budget to help state and counties manage the legal impacts of the Blake
decision, and another $88.4 million to help establish the new programs. Of the $88.4 million,
$4.5 million will go to the AOC to help enhance municipal and district therapeutic courts.
Edmonds Requests
o Move $6.5 million from Waterfront Connector project to Highway 99 transportation
improvement program - Accomplished
o Earmark up to $8.175 million to facilitate transfer of former UNOCAL site from WSDOT to
an agency - $258,000 earmarked for this project
Local Government Priorities
o Adopt a new transportation revenue package - stay tuned
o Provide cities with greater fiscal flexibility
■ HB 1069 signed May 13.
- Allows revenue from CJ Assistance Accounts to supplant existing funds
- Allows sales/use tax for chemical dependency or mental health treatment to be used
for modifications to existing facilities to address health/safety needs related to CH or
MH.
- Reduces restrictions on the allowed use of CJ sales taxes and REET taxes through
December 31, 2023.
- Increases the amount of time a water and electricity or sewage lien can be applied after
the declaration of an emergency by the Governor that prevents collection
■ HB 1189 authorizes local governments to designate tax increment financing areas and to
use increased local property tax collections to fund public improvements
Looking Ahead and Next Steps
o Special session later this year?
o Legislative Delegation Meetings
o Develop 2022 Legislative Agenda
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 4
Packet Pg. 17
7.1.a
Council President Paine commented the legislative session was very successful. She expressed interested
in analysis of MFTE. She asked if there was any talk about adding support for road from electric vehicles,
observing there were more and more electric vehicles and the gas tax was declining as a result. She clarified
she was not suggesting removing the gas tax as it was a stable funding source. Ms. Munguia said the gas
tax is not a stable source which is why existing transportation revenues need some help. The state does not
have a sustainable revenue sources to maintain the current projects. The proposals from both the House and
Senate included an increase in the gas tax as well as a road usage charge due to electric vehicles. There is
an emphasis in the budget on creating more infrastructure for electric vehicle such as requiring publicly
funded projects include more charging stations. There is also a pilot project with hydrogen fuel cells which
are already operating in California. A hydrogen fuel cell station is similar to a gas station and it only takes
a few minutes to charge an electric vehicle. That may be easier with the existing infrastructure. Senator
Hobbs and especially Representative Fey, who chair the House and Senate Transportation Committees, are
interested in doing things in an environmental manner.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed appreciation for all the work Ms. Munguia did providing detailed
legislative updates. They were very helpful and allowed her to share information with citizens. She was
happy about WRIA 8 priorities. She inquired about Senator Salomon's bill regarding armoring and asked
if ports were exempt. Ms. Munguia offered to look into it. Councilmember Buckshnis said she would
forward her a question regarding that issue.
Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about another bill related to salmon and changing the State
Comprehensive Plan. She asked what "yes" and "no" mean on the list of bills. Mr. Doherty advised that is
related to whether the City is in support or not and if it is a blank, it is not a priority. Councilmember
Buckshnis offered to forward her questions regarding bills to Ms. Munguia. Councilmember Buckshnis
relayed the Puget Sound Partnership, Salmon Recovery Council and WRIA 8 are interested in a few of the
bills and she would like to get more information. Ms. Munguia relayed Representative Lekanoff's bill 1177
did not pass but she believed something was included in the budget.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Ms. Munguia for her work on Highway 99 and moving the money
from the from waterfront connector to Highway 99. She asked Ms. Munguia to let her know if there was
any way she could assist such as contacting or meeting with legislators to talk about Highway 99.
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
AMEND THE AGENDA AS FOLLOWS: CHANGE COUNCIL BUSINESS #8 TO UNFINISHED
BUSINESS, WITH THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS: 8.1 PROCESS FOR REVIEWING
HOUSING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS, 8.2 STATE 2 TREE ISSUES, AND 8.3
RESOLUTION ADOPTING COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE; AND ADD AGENDA ITEM 9
NEW BUSINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS: 9.1 DISCUSS COUNCIL
APPROVAL FOR CLOSURE OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY, 9.2 AMENDMENT ECC 10.80 SALARY
COMMISSION, AND 9.3 PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 17.75 ECDC, ENTITLED "OUTDOOR" DINING" AND A
RELATED SECTION IN CHAPTER 17.70 ECDC. COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON FURTHER
MOVED THAT ITEM 10, MAYOR'S COMMENTS, PRECEDE ITEM 11, COUNCIL COMMENTS.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested taking the proposed changes one at a time.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 5
Packet Pg. 18
7.1.a
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested first determining if the Council agreed to change Council Business
to Unfinished Business and New Business.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she sent an email outlying the proposed changes to each Councilmember.
She explained under the draft Rules of Procedure, the City Clerk proposed the order of business for regular
meetings as follows:
1. Call to Order, Flag Salute
2. Land Acknowledgment
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of the Agenda
5. Presentations
6. Public Comment
7. Approval of the Consent Agenda
8. Unfinished Business
9. New Business
10. Mayor's Comments
11. Council Comments
12. Executive Session, if needed
13. Adjournment
Councilmember K. Johnson recommended the Council follow these long-established procedures that are
outlined in the Council Rules of Procedure.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas preferred at this late date and since it had not been brought up in advance,
moving forward with the agenda as scheduled and to discuss this next week. She anticipated it could take
45 minutes to the approve the agenda and she preferred to get some work done instead of moving agenda
items around. She did not see the purpose of moving agenda items around tonight and encouraged
Councilmember not to support the motion.
Council President Paine pointed out there were a couple of time sensitive agenda items, 8.1 Amending ECC
10.80 Salary Commission, and 8.4 Planning Board recommendation to approve an amendment. Those two
items need to be considered earlier on the agenda due to the potential for items to be postponed to a future
meeting. She preferred to leave agenda as is because it was what Councilmembers prepared for and it was
the way the packet was ordered.
Councilmember L. Johnson concurred with Council President Paine. Though the information was sent to
Councilmembers ahead of time, it was sent just minutes before the meeting which required
Councilmembers to consider the change during meeting. She preferred to have time to consider the proposal
and to proceed with the meeting as scheduled, particularly as there are staff waiting to present agenda items.
Councilmember Distelhorst pointed out the agenda included a number of items that have been postponed
from previous agendas. The Council only has three hours per week to transact business and could use this
time to get through business that has been delayed. He preferred to work through the agenda and get some
work done.
Councilmember K. Johnson reiterated her position, stating this was a proper way to proceed and she has
given advance notice to Council President Paine. The reasons agenda items are being continuously
postponed is because the Council does not have enough time. The Council needs to address unfinished
business before new business and if the Council spent less time talking, that could be achieved. She also
wanted to add a new agenda item that was proposed by Councilmember Olson, Council Approval for
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 6
Packet Pg. 19
7.1.a
Closure of Rights -of -Way. Even if the Council did not want to follow proper procedures, she wanted to add
that to the agenda.
Mayor Nelson requested Councilmembers keep their remarks remain respectful and refrain from
inflammatory remarks regarding whether the Council was following proper procedures.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reiterated her support for moving forward. She did not have an
opportunity to read the email before meeting and doing it at the last minute did not make sense and just
took more time. She encouraged Councilmembers to vote against the motion and if an item needed to be
added to the agenda, that could be done via a separate motion.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4); COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST,
FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO ADD TO THE AGENDA COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR CLOSURES OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY.
Councilmember Olson said it was in the City's interest to have a robust conversation when rights -of -way
are closed and to have Council approval. This was something the Council needed to talk about and she
hoped it could be added to the agenda so that conversation could occur. This is a bigger issue than the
specific closure that was before the Council recently, it is related to all street closures.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed the Council probably needed to look at this long-term, but the fact
that the City received 3,000 comments regarding the street closure indicated there had been transparency
and there had been public input. She welcomed the discussion long term but was not interested in having a
debate tonight without any notice.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed her total support. In the interest of transparency, she supported
putting it on the agenda so individual Councilmembers could express their opinions. Council has not been
given sufficient opportunity to speak about things such as rights -of -way and there have been questions
about the surveys. She supported putting it on the agenda to determine where each Councilmember stands
on this issue, noting it has caused a lot of tension, uncertainty and stress among many people.
Councilmember L. Johnson commented this was coming to the Council at the last minute and it seems fairer
to allow Councilmembers to prepare for such discussions. She agreed this had widely discussed but it was
not just about Walkable Main Street. She feared requiring Council approval to close rights -of -way was
opening an enormous door. Councilmembers deserve an opportunity to do their homework, thoroughly
consider what that may entail, and come to the meeting prepared and not just speak to opinion. For those
reasons, she did not support having that discussion tonight, but as Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said, it
is likely something the Council needs to discuss at an upcoming meeting.
Councilmember Olson clarified she planned to ask the City Attorney to bring back a resolution, assuming
there would be Council support for that, so there would be another 1-2 weeks to prepare. If the motion fails,
she will request the Council President put it on next week's agenda.
Councilmember K. Johnson suggested there could be three points of contact for the Council, first having it
on the agenda for discussion followed by several other contacts. She was uncertain how the Council could
discuss something without first putting it on the agenda. She supported Councilmember Olson's request
100%, if not tonight, then next Tuesday.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 7
Packet Pg. 20
7.1.a
Councilmember L. Johnson commented if the Council were to have this discussion and direct the City
Attorney, she needed an opportunity to do her own research and come to the meeting prepared instead of a
free-for-all conversation and directing the City Attorney based on that discussion. That is not a good use of
limited meeting time and Councilmembers deserve the opportunity to come to the meeting prepared.
Council President Paine said she also would like this to be better organized. It can be scheduled on the
agenda at some point, but she was concerned with putting it on the agenda with an assumption for a means
to an end rather than deciding if there is a need. It will be necessary to have an assessment first to see if
there is a need; she was unsure there was a need.
Councilmember Distelhorst said he had been contacted a number of times regarding this and provided the
same answer, that there needs to be research of how rights -of -way are handled in other cities. There are a
lot of examples in surrounding and other Puget Sound cities regarding how this is handled and that research
needs to be done first so there can be informed decision making as part of the discussion. Once that research
is done, he was very supportive of looking at how the City's code may the same or different and how that
issue can be handled.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented three Councilmember seem to have known this was coming
up; she did not other than quickly reading through her email and seeing the subject lines. She preferred to
have more information before putting it on the agenda. She agreed it was good to look at this long term but
she assumed it had been raised due to the immediate issue. She expressed interest in the survey responses
which are an important component of this. She agreed with researching what other cities in the area are
doing. Making assumptions that the Council should control this feels like the Council is jumping into the
administrative role although she understood that this could potentially be legislative. She wanted further
information on the matter before discussing it. Although there was validity to the issue, it was not enough
to warrant discussion tonight. She pointed out it is now 7:51 p.m. and the Council has not yet approved the
agenda.
Councilmember K. Johnson pointed out the proposed procedures states an item may be placed on the agenda
by majority vote or consensus of the Council. She did not want to debate the merits of the agenda item or
what information Councilmembers needed, she only wanted to have it placed on the agenda for discussion
when the Council reached that agenda item.
COUNCILMEMBER L. JOHNSON CALLED THE QUESTION. VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE
QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4); COUNCILMEMBERS K. JOHNSON,
BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS DISTELHORST,
FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND L. JOHNSON AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE VOTING NO.
MAIN MOTION CARRIED (6-1); COUNCILMEMBER K. JOHNSON VOTING NO.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson invited participants and described the procedures for audience comments.
Linda Ferkingstad, Edmonds, referenced the tree ordinance that the City Council approved that requires
landowners pay for an arborist assessment of each tree above 24" DBH that needs to be removed to build
a home and then pay the amount of the tree's worth to the City. The City's charges, takings or taxes begin
at $3300 for each 24" tree to $12,000+ for larger trees. The City is taxing Edmonds property owners 100%
for the worth of their trees before they are allowed to divide or build on property, trees that belong to the
property owner, not the City. The City soon plans to apply this tax to all Edmonds homeowners. The City
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 8
Packet Pg. 21
7.1.a
has violated property rights afforded by the U.S. Constitutions 5t' and 14t1i amendments, illegal takings
clauses, facilitated an illegal governmental taking of the worth of property without compensation, taxation
without representation. They like trees and purchased over an acre filled with trees to build three modest
homes with views of Puget Sound. They planned to retain 50% of the trees on their property, 20% over
Edmonds' requirement, yet they are still subject to a 100% tax for the worth of every tree above 24"
removed, totaling $250,000. The only option to reduce this tax is to remove fewer trees, a tree tax of
$170,000 that requires the three homes be placed 10' apart, reducing privacy and the Puget Sound views,
decreasing their value more than the $80,000 it would save.
Ms. Ferkingstad explained the tree ordinance tax, delays in the permit process and moratoriums have
increased the cost of building their homes 20-30%. They have lost time and money and most importantly,
their dream of living next to her now 86 year old parents who were 82 when they first met with City
planning. For three homes, they have already spent $100,000 to comply with City requirements and now
have a tree tax of $250,000 and will probably pay an additional $100,000 for each home due to rising
material costs, making it nearly impossible to recoup their costs. Saving trees is a commendable goal that
most want to achieve. Edmonds City Council is using this goal to target property owners with an illegal
100% tax on their trees, expecting those filing the 10 land division applications in Edmonds per year to
entirely fund the tree fund. If not rescinded, this tree ordinance will cost Edmonds taxpayers to defend
illegal takings in court. With regard to Walkable Main Street, she anticipated most residents would change
their vote to no if they knew it would hurt the businesses. She urged the City Council to listen.
Greg Arnold, Edmonds, asked the goal of the tree ordinance. Mayor Nelson advised the purpose of
Audience Comments was for comments, not questions. Mr. Arnold said his research had not revealed any
reason for the tree ordinance and he assumed it was for environmental reasons. If that was the case,
outlawing cutting and fertilizing lawns would have a much bigger environmental impact. He agreed with
the previous speaker and questioned why the Council was targeting people with views. Many people who
live in the bowl bought their property due to views and want to be able to trim their trees. If the tree code
was an environmental idea, it was not based on science. He would like to hear the reason and the science
behind the tree ordinance.
Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, commented on the City's intent to regulate trees on private property, specifically
a memorandum/information developed by the City to support the Stage 2 Tree Issues discussion. She did
not feel the information provided in support of this agenda item was clear, balanced or provided sufficient
detail about the potential impacts of the City's actions. Goal lA of the Urban Forest Management Plan
(UFMP) which is quoted in two places implies that the City's current undertaking is supported by the
UFMP. It is not; the UFMP clearly states for private lands, the UFMP would guide education and incentives
to encourage good tree management practices. For context, Goal I is to update tree regulations to reduce
clearcutting and other development impacts. She encouraged the Council and anyone listening to read the
goals on page 8 of the UFMP if there were any concerns about her statements. The memorandum also states
interest was expressed by members of the Planning Board, City Council and public in expanding tree
regulations as justification for the current action. The memo does not include any indication of the feedback
provided during the development of the UFMP which clearly states public engagement on urban forest
issues has demonstrated that the public is generally satisfied with the City's activities on public property,
but prefers to have the City only provide guidance and education as opposed to regulation when it comes
to stewardship of trees on private property (page 56).
Ms. Seitz said the memo appears to unbalanced because it selectively chooses what feedback to include and
does not include any of the public feedback information from the UFMP. It is not fair, transparent, or good
public practice for the recent view of the Planning Board, City Council and select public referenced in the
memo to outweigh the entirety of the UFMP process and public outreach. Page 2 of the memo lists six
options for regulating the maintenance of private trees and she questioned why it did not include a no action
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 9
Packet Pg. 22
7.1.a
alternative. Having decided on a whim to do this with an emergency ordinance, she questioned why the
Council could not decide it is a flawed idea and presented that as an option. She suggested including more
options that target un-treed properties as they are clearly the source of the tree canopy coverage. Generally
environmental stewardship laws try to target the polluters and not those involved in beneficial stewardship
which is why these types of regulations backfire. She referred to the paragraph regarding equity issues that
only scratches the surface on the effects of requiring tree retention in less developed, poorer properties and
spending more than a page discussing view corridors.
(Written comments submitted to PublicComment@Edmondswa.gov are attached.)
7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PAINE, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The
agenda items approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING/BUDGET RETREAT MINUTES OF
MAY 8, 2021
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 25, 2021
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. AMENDING ECC 10.80 SALARY COMMISSION
HR Director Jessica Neill Hoyson explained there are two primary amendments, 1) changing the regular
cycle of the Salary Commission from every two years to every four years, and 2) selecting Salary
Commission members in the year in which the Commission meets. The Commission has had fairly
consistent recommendations with regard to changes in compensation for the Mayor and City Council, but
a significant amount of staff hours are needed to support the commission. That seemed to indicate a four-
year cycle would utilize the City's resources more effectively.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why these changes were being proposed now, relaying that a lot of people
are wondering why the Council is the topic of many procedures. The last Salary Commission recommended
creating a job description and said the salaries were not commensurate with the amount of work. The Salary
Commission did not interview all Councilmembers and did not interview her when she was Council
President in 2014. She questioned the estimate of 150 staff hours, noting although that was a lot, it was
spread over two or four years. When she inquired about the estimate, she was told the City did not dedicate
that much time to the commission. She reiterated her question of why now. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered it
seem appropriate to do it now coming out of COVID and possibly holding Council and Mayor salaries flat
while the City's financial resources are determined. She was uncertain who Councilmember Buckshnis
spoke with regarding the time allocated to the commission; she spoke with those who actually did the work,
staff that supported it and the consultant as well as the former HR Director and all confirmed the amount
of staff time required to support the commission. She acknowledged it was an estimation as staff did not
keep track of the exact hours; the estimate was 5-10 hours/week beginning in March.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why the commission's recommendation to develop a job description was
not followed. Ms. Neill Hoyson responded it would be very odd to have a job description for Council; she
was unaware of any other cities that have a Council job description as Councilmembers are not employees.
If the intent of a job description is to more accurately compare the work the Edmonds' Council does to
other comparable cities, a job description is unlikely to achieve that. Councilmembers' duties are outlined
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 10
Packet Pg. 23
7.1.a
in the RCW; every City and Council does that differently and every Councilmember does that work
differently and may devote different amounts of time. A job description would just restate what the Council
is authorized to do per the RCW and would not address compensation issues versus an employee where the
job description identifies level of authority, years of experience, education requirements, independence, etc.
While she understood the commission said a job description would be helpful, she disagreed.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented there were four new Councilmembers last year and she recalled a
Councilmember saying it would have been beneficial to have an understanding of the roles of Council
President. Many things could be included in a job description, not just related to compensation. The
commission spent a lot of time and provided some examples and she was concerned the City was not
pursuing their recommendations.
Council President Paine raised a point of order, requesting Councilmember Buckshnis speak to the content
and not the experience of other Councilmembers. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was speaking about
the legacy of why a job description would be helpful.
Council President Paine expressed concerned about equity and whether this has gone through an equity
analysis with regard to the pay and the salary structure. She was not opposed to the proposed changes, but
felt there needed to be an equity analysis. Compensation changes have been consistent over the years, but
it does not provide information about who is able to be part of the City Council. She recalled comments in
the commission's past reports that the pay is fairly low so the result is hobbyists rather than valuing the
time. She supported doing an equity analysis as part of the next Salary Commission's work.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed the Salary Commission meets every two years. Ms. Neill
Hoyson advised the current code requires the commission met every two years in odd numbered years.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed the Council does not have to accept the commission's findings.
Ms. Neill Hoyson answered once they are submitted to the City Clerk, the Council has no authority to
accept or reject their proposals. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled at one point the Council
disbanded the Salary Commission due to an unwillingness to accept their recommendation for an increase.
The ability for Councilmembers to do the job is for the voters to decide; there is no measurement tool
because Councilmembers are not City employees. She agreed the salary was low, recalling $0.19-0.20/hour
was suggested, but it is not necessarily something that people do for the money. However, unless a
Councilmember has another source of income, they cannot afford to be on Council. Someone working full-
time may not be unable to participate in everything the Council does.
Councilmember Distelhorst expressed support for an equity analysis, noting a lot of work is occurring in
the City related to evaluating departments, and it would be appropriate to apply this to that work. He asked
how four years was determined rather than three, noting four years seemed like a long time. With regard to
continuity of membership and not having to reinvent that process, commissioners can serve two terms but
as proposed essentially everyone would be up for reappointment. Ms. Neill Hoyson answered the term
would only be during the time the commission meets because there is no work for them to do outside of
when they meet to establish salaries of elected officials. Having commissioners in their position only during
the time the commission is meeting is administratively more manageable. With regard to four years, that
seemed like a reasonable amount of time given the history of consistent changes, often no changes.
Reappointment to two terms is established per RCW.
Councilmember L. Johnson commented while serving and prior to serving it was hard to ignore that a
certain level of privilege was required to serve on Council which results in at least to some degree a
consolidation of power among a somewhat similar subset of the community, leaving out a large subset of
the community. The City is working on using an equity lens across the board in the City While she
appreciated that the administration was additionally burdened right now especially with COVID and that
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 11
Packet Pg. 24
7.1.a
resources were stretched, she was concerned with pushing this off without a clear picture of how to apply
an equity lens so who is represented on Council can be expanded. She hoped to continue this discussion
and come back with a broader picture of what this might look like.
Councilmember Olson questioned the urgence of this action. It seemed that the Salary Commission
members learned of this by Councilmembers asking them questions versus staff consulting them. She
recalled Ms. Neill Hoyson mentioning she spoke with the consultant and staff and suggested input from the
commission may be of value. Ms. Neill Hoyson said staff did not speak to any current commissioners
regarding the proposed change. The urgency is if the commission convenes this year, it needs to happen in
July which will require notifying people about appointment to the commission; several commissioners'
terms expired at the end of last year.
Councilmember Olson asked if former salary Commission members were contacted. Ms. Neill Hoyson said
no Salary Commissioners were contacted. Councilmember Olson appreciated staff considering a three or
four year meeting cycle, agreeing a two-year cycle may be a bigger use of resources. She referred to
language she provided to staff and bcc'd to Council regarding continuity.
City Attorney Jeff Taraday observed a majority of Councilmembers have raised concerns about equity and
making the City Council positions more accessible to a broader array of community members by making it
more of a living wage. It is unlikely a Salary Commission would get the Council to that place based on
previous Salary Commissions' results. If that is the direction the Council wants to go, the path would be to
disband the Salary Commission, have the Council set salaries for future Councilmembers, not their own,
and they can be set as high or as low to accomplish those policy aims. That is allowed under state law
because the Council will not be setting its own salaries. If the Council wants to undertake an equity approach
to the Council salary, that is the way to accomplish it.
Ms. Neill Hoyson agreed if the Council's intent was a full-time living wage for Councilmembers, convening
the Salary Commission this year would not achieve that.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the Salary Commission was disbanded in 2014. If the Salary
Commission is disbanded and the Council sets its own salary, she asked what happens to the Mayor's salary
and does a Salary Commission need to be established to set the Mayor's salary. Mr. Taraday recalled the
Council set the Mayor's salary. Ms. Neill Hoyson said that year that the Council disbanded the Salary
Commission, the Council did not receive an increase and the Mayor was given a COLA.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the Salary Commission meets in off years when there are no elections.
Ms. Neill Hoyson answered the Salary Commission meets every two years in odd years; moving to every
four years would still have it occur in odd years. If that was the intent, a three year cycle may not meet that
intent.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled former Councilmember Joan Bloom was also interested in the issue of
equity. She relayed Councilmembers do not do full-time work, but the salary should be more than
$1000/month.
Councilmember K. Johnson supported the way the Salary Commission was established. There were
staggered three-year terms and they provided information between July 1st and September 30t''. She
preferred to continue with that process and found no compelling reason to change it at this time. Because it
is a five member commission with staggered terms over three years, it is possible to have two vacancies.
She urged the Council to continue with the existing Salary Commission process and not make any changes
at this time.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 12
Packet Pg. 25
7.1.a
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked when the Mayor's salary was last increased. Ms. Neill Hoyson
answered the Mayor has received a COLA each year; the last one was in 2021. Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas asked when it was last increased besides COLA. Ms. Neill Hoyson said she researched back to
2012 and it has only been a COLA since then. She offered to research that further.
Councilmember Olson asked whether information from the commissioners could be included in the
narrative next week. There has been a lot of information from several parties for consideration today, but
the commissioners seems to be a missing element. That would also give Council time to think about what
they have heard. Ms. Neill Hoyson asked what information she was looking for from commissioners,
whether it was input on the proposed changes. Councilmember Olson answered she was interested in their
perspective on sunsetting, whether continuity was of value, and the change from a two year cycle to a four
year cycle.
2. PROCESS FOR REVIEWING HOUSING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
Development Services Director Shane Hope recalled at the May fl' meeting the Council was close to
approving a process for reviewing the Housing Commission's recommendation. At the conclusion of the
May 11t1i, meeting it was agreed it would only take a few minutes to decide which policy ideas to consider
first. She explained reviewing recommendations from the Housing Commission does not mean the Council
is approving them, just that they are trying to get a fuller sense of them and determine the need for more
details and other work to be done. For example, after the Council's initial review of idea, they could decide
to have the Planning Board work on it further, provide the Planning Board direction or comments, variations
on the idea, more details, etc. For the policy recommendation that do not require Planning Board review,
the Council could direct staff to return with more detailed information.
Ms. Hope explained at the May 11' meeting, Councilmembers were split on Option 1, divide the work first,
or Option 2, start simple. A hybrid of the approaches was possible and Council could even have a study
session later this month to review a short list of items. In a hybrid approach, Council could divide up the
work and refer some things to the Planning Board this year, knowing that all Planning Board
recommendations will come to the Council for further work and final decision, and address a couple things
that do not need Planning Board input. The remaining items, especially the more complex ones, could get
started later, probably in 2022. In that approach, the Council could begin with 2-3 items of low to moderate
complexity for the Planning Board to start working on this year and maybe one item the Planning Board
could work on after a budget allocation. For the Planning Board this year, the Council could do an initial
review of a short list of recommendations.
Ms. Hope displayed the Housing Commission Policy Aspects Table:
Housing Commission
Subject to PB
Level of Need for
Est. Min. Time
Policy
Review
Complexity Outside
For PB
Consultant
consideration
Missing middle housing
Yes
ig Probably not
4-6 mo.
in single family
neighborhoods
Equity housing incentives
Yes
High Probably not
4-6 mo.
Medium -density SF
Yes
High Probably not
4-5 mo.
housing
Neighborhood village
Yes
High
Yes
8-9 mo.
subarea planning
Cluster/cottage housing
Yes
Moderate
Probably not
4 mo.
Detached accessory
Yes
Low
No
3 mo.
dwelling units
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 13
Packet Pg. 26
7.1.a
Multi -family tax
No
Moderate
Probably not
exemption (MFTE)
Inclusionary Zoning
Yes
High
Probably not
4-5 mo.
Existing Sales Tax for
No
Low
No
Affordable Housing
County Sales Tax for
No
Low
No
Affordable Housing
HASCO ILA
No
Low
No
Development of Housing
No
Low
No
Partners
Multi -family design
Yes
Moderate
Probably Yes
4-5 mo.
standards
Parking Solutions as
Yes
Moderate
No, not at this
2-4 mo.
Comp Plan goal
stage
Discriminatory
No
Low
No
Provisions in Covenants
& Deeds
Note: Est. time for PB consideration includes the PB process and simultaneous staff time. Some of the
policies, such as items 6 and 7 above, could be considered together
Ms. Hope explained the most likely items for a short list of ideas for initial review seem to be:
• Detached accessory dwelling units (low complexity)
• Cluster/cottage housing (moderate complexity)
• Multi -family design standards (moderate complexity)
• Neighborhood village subarea planning (high complexity and likely will need a budget allocation)
Ms. Hope explained the Council could also work on non -Planning Board items later this year by
considering:
• Discriminatory provisions in covenants & deeds (low complexity)
• Development of housing partners (low complexity)
In 2022 after the Planning Board begins work on a short list, the Council could review the remaining ideas
and provide direction/comments to the Planning Board. The Planning Board would do their work and
provide recommendations to the City Council for further consideration, public input, Council changes, final
decisions.
Ms. Hope said if the Council concurs with this approach, staff will work with the Council President to
schedule an initial review of the short list of items, possibly at a special study session this month. A study
session, open to the public, would allow a more focused look without other City business on the agenda. If
a study session is not possible, it will be worked into the Council's regular agenda. She asked for Council
input on, 1) whether the Council agrees with staff bringing back the short list of items to Council for initial
review, and 2) is the Council willing to have special study session focused on the short list of items rather
doing it at a regular Council meeting.
Councilmember K. Johnson said the May 1 I' minutes suggest selecting two general recommendations and
two Planning Board recommendations. However, tonight Ms. Hope identified three general
recommendations and four Planning Board recommendations. She asked if those should be reduced to just
two. Ms. Hope recalled there was a suggestion to identify two items for the Planning Board and two non -
Planning Board items. She also recalled a suggestion for three Planning Board items, one simple, one
moderate and one complex. She was uncertain that it was decided that there would only be two.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 14
Packet Pg. 27
7.1.a
Councilmember L. Johnson was in favor of a special study session later this month. She appreciated the
items Ms. Hope identified for a short list such as having the Planning Board look at DADUs and
cluster/cottage housing, items the Planning Board has expressed interest in. She agreed multifamily design
requirements were also an important component because that will provide the Council and the general
public a visual and will answer a lot of questions. It will be difficult to move forward with discussions on
cluster/cottage housing and even DADUs without the multifamily design requirements. She supported those
moving forward in tandem.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for a special session. Her concern is the Council has not
discussed the vision for Edmonds. If the input on the survey was followed, there would be no upzoning, no
DADUs and only single family homes. She asked if the study session will include looking at the
Comprehensive Plan and the policies in the housing element and whether those need to be changed. Ms.
Hope envisioned that would be part of presenting the short list of items or any of the Housing Commission
work. In the Comprehensive Plan, the Council set the vision for future; it is multi -faceted.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with the need for reviewing multifamily design requirements. She asked
if the Housing Commission policies that Ms. Hope selected were from the list of Housing Commission
policies that identified level of complexity. Ms. Hope referred to the table on page 181 in the packet that
listed all 15 of the Housing Commission's policy recommendations. There is a column "Subject to PB
Review," nine of the policies are subject to Planning Board review. The level of complexity, high, moderate
or low, was somewhat of a value judgment. At least a couple of the policies will require an outside
consultant but most will not. There was no final decision on May fl' regarding which items to move
forward so that is the intent of tonight's agenda item. She emphasized the Council's review of the policies
would not be decisions on the policies, just gathering more information to make a decision about next steps
or to forwarding them to the Planning Board.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the City has a lot of middle housing stock in 1950s-1980s houses.
Neighborhoods are changing, houses are being razed and larger houses are being built. The Council also
needs to consider the Comprehensive Plan and the impacts of additional housing on the environment and
stormwater. Ms. Hope said that would be part of the consideration and discussion if any of them go to the
next step. It may take months to gather all the information to make a decision. The Housing Commission
recommendations were at a broad level; implementation could vary and would have different impacts. The
intent is just to start.
Council President Paine expressed support for a special meeting. She would like to have the Planning Board
start on a couple of the items Councilmember L. Johnson mentioned, envisioning that would be a good way
to kick things off and begin to form the direction.
Councilmember Distelhorst said the input he provided last month was incorporated in what Ms. Hope said.
He welcomed a special study session on housing issues.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked Ms. Hope what she expected from Council tonight. Ms. Hope asked the
Council to confirm whether the short list of policies sounded reasonable to begin looking at and whether to
schedule a special study session. The list for Planning Board would include DADUs, multifamily design,
cluster/cottage housing and possibly subarea planning later because it will need a budget allocation. Items
that do not require Planning Board review include discriminatory provisions in covenants & deeds and
possible options for community and regional partnerships.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked how DADU and cluster/cottage housing were selected. Ms. Hope it was
discussed at the May I I' meeting and several Councilmember thought those would be useful. DADUs are
one of the simpler things for the Planning Board to consider. Councilmember Buckshnis said someone sent
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 15
Packet Pg. 28
7.1.a
her a picture of a DADU and it looks like just another house. She was concerned about upzoning and not
having transition zones. Citizens need to know where and how rather than everything being carte blanche.
Hearing no opposition, Ms. Hope assumed there was Council consensus to proceed with those items and
schedule a special study session.
3. STAGE 2 TREE ISSUES
Development Services Director Hope said this is a follow up on an issue the Council has considered over
several months. The Council adopted new regulations related to development following up on the UFMP
and other work. Council has also been interested in doing things beyond that.
Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained when the Council was working on tree code
regulations that applied to developing sites, a number of Stage 2 items were identified for future updates.
Some are underway now and nearing completion such as Inventory of Downtown Trees, Street Tree Plan
Update, and Tree Canopy Assessment. He displayed a list of Upcoming Tree -Related Items and Timing,
explaining the shaded items will go to the Planning Board and the Planning Board has requested clear
direction from Council on those items.
Item
Timing
Inventory of downtown street trees
Q2 2021-Q3 2021
Inventory of other public trees
2022 or TBD
Street Tree Plan update
Q2 2021-Q4 20221
Tree canopy assessment
Q2 2021-Q3 2021
Heritage Tree Program
Q32021-Q4 2021
Tree Canopy Goal
Q3 2021
Assessment of staffing and other resource needs
Q2 2021 -2022 or TBD
Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions
Q4 2021-2022 or TBD
Exploration of other incentive programs
2022 or TBD
Open space acquisition
Q4 2021-2022 or TBD
Tree retention on private property (not related to development)
Q4 2021
Partnerships with other organizations
Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD
Annual reports on City tree activities
Q2 2021
Tree give-away program
2022 or TBD
View corridors wr2022
or TBD RP
Wildlife & habitat corridors
Q3 2021-Q4 2021
Expanded public education & Information
Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD
Stormwater & watershed Analysis
Q4 2021-2022 or TBD
Other tree -related issues
2022 or TBD
Mr. Lien reviewed:
Tree Regulations on Private Property
o Goal 1 - Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage
The city has limited information about the condition of the urban forest. Success with this
objective will be achieved with enhanced management of public trees and a deeper
understanding of the population of trees on private property. The following actions will support
this objective:
A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban
forest and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code
violations
o Goal 3 -Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 16
Packet Pg. 29
To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the city recognizes that voluntary public
participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective.
Equity
o Edmonds is a varied city that has developed over many years.
o In some areas, large swaths of native trees have been cut — as part of intense urban development
o Elsewhere, many trees remain, due to limited incentives to remove them or perhaps the
landscape did not encourage their removal (e.g. steep slopes or stream corridors)
o Equity concerns should be considered
o A balancing of private property rights with public benefit should be considered
Options for Tree Retention on Private Property Not Related to Development
1. Require fee permit for removal of any significant tree (6 inch DBH)
2. Allow X number of trees on a given property to be removed over a period of time
3. Allow X number of trees less the 24 inch DBH to be removed over a period of time
4. Require paid permit for removal of more than the allowed number of trees and for removal of
24 inch DBH trees
5. Review retention requirements for all of the above, or only when permit is required?
6. Consider whether all residential properties should be required to have minimum number of
trees
Heritage Tree Program
o UFMP Goal LD Develop a voluntary heritage tree program
1. Completely voluntary program. Designated Heritage Tree to be removed from Heritage
Tree Program at owners desire
2. Property owner voluntarily designates Heritage Tree, but Heritage Tree must be protected
and only removed if hazard or nuisance
3. Anyone may nominate a Heritage Tree regardless of property owner's consent and
Heritage Tree must be protected
Views
o UFMP recognizes views, but does not include in specific goals related to view protection
o Public view corridors vs. private view protection
o City would be arbitrator between property owners
o State has strong protections regarding private property rights and city will have limited ability
to enforce restrictions on one property to protect the view afforded another
o Other considerations include critical areas
View Options
o Establish "view sheds" or "view areas"
a. Limit mature tree height to allowable zoning height
b. Require a "view corridor" over a percentage of the property line where trees could not be
planted
o Establish process where trees may be removed if they grow into a view in a "view area"
o If city pursues regulations regarding private views other factors need to be considered such as
critical areas
Habitat Corridors
o Largely protected by critical areas
o Education
■ Stormwater crews
■ Partner with organizations such as Stream Keepers and Students Saving Salmon
o Critical area Habitat and Species of Local importance
o Tree canopy assessment
Incentives
o Goals 3 — Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 17
Packet Pg. 30
To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the City recognizes that voluntary public
participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective:
A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds
B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of:
i. A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes; and/or
ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or
iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of tree planting
and protection.
C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property owners that
maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees
Mr. Lien relayed staff was seeking direction from direction from Council on what they wanted to see in the
Stage 2 Tree Update related to the options for tree retention on private property not related to development:
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why it was necessary to charge any fees when the goal was to keep track
of trees being cut down. She asked why the City would want to require a fee permit for 6 inch tree. Mr.
Lien referred to the list of options on page 186 for tree retention on private property not related to
development. He was not recommending a fee, but that was one of the options for Council to consider.
With that option, if someone wanted to remove a tree, a permit could be required with a minimal fee.
Options 2 would not require fee permit but would require documentation. Property owners would be
allowed to remove X trees of any size per year; it would not require a permit or fee, but documentation
would need to be submitted so the City could track it and ensure they were not asking to remove more than
the number of trees they were allotted. Option 3 would allow property owners to remove X number of
smaller trees. Option 4 would require a permit to remove more than the allowed number of trees or removal
of 24" DBH trees. If permits are required for removal, even the 24" DBH trees, it will be necessary to
establish criteria; why would the City say no to removing those trees, are they allowed outright, is a permit
required to review a replanting plan, etc. Options 5 and 6 refer to retention requirements and a minimum
number of trees on the property. He summarized a fee permit for any tree removal is option as well as no
fee but documentation.
Councilmember Buckshnis preferred Options 1, 2 and 3. She recognized those will be labor intensive and
asked whether an analysis had been done regarding additional staff. Ms. Hope said the exact amount of
staffing depends on which option the Council selects. There would need to be an urban forester or arborist
position to oversee this as well as 1-2 additional staff or more if a more complex process was selected.
There are a lot of costs associated with tracking regardless of whether a fee is charged.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented on the unintended consequences she has witnessed with the
emergency ordinance regarding 24" landmark trees. Homeowners reporting their neighbors to the City for
cutting a big tree. She wanted citizens to feel comfortable that they could remove some trees and to
understand the environmental reasons for retaining trees. She preferred a no fee permit and only monitoring.
Ms. Hope recalled some Councilmembers were interested in staff talking with people who wanted to cut
trees and explaining their options. That is a great idea but will also require staff resources.
Council President Paine agreed with either free or low cost permitting for trees. She supported some type
of permitting process so the City can track what is happening with trees. Before adopting requirements, it
will be important to have the canopy assessment to provide a measurement. The Council can then determine
a canopy goal/target and how to reach that canopy. Education will be helpful to many homeowners. The
program will require resources include urban forestry staff, code enforcement, permit review, and staff who
to provide education.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 18
Packet Pg. 31
7.1.a
Council President Paine asked if the Planning Board was seeking direction from the Council about a
Heritage Tree Program. Ms. Hope said the Planning Board was interested in direction from the Council
about a Heritage Tree Program. Mr. Lien said the Heritage Tree Program is separate from regulations for
tree retention on private property. The Heritage Tree Program would be a recognition type program, two
separate code updates. The Planning Board is seeking direction from Council regarding tree retention on
private property not related to development. He provided the six options to give Council something to
consider.
Councilmember Olson agreed with not requiring a fee. She recalled Bill Phipps referencing Kirkland's code
and what he like about it was there was no fee and the city took responsibility for planting elsewhere for
some of the trees being removed. There is greater incentive for a property owner to identify the trees they
want to remove and get counsel from the city arborist or other knowledgeable source regarding alternatives
to removing a tree. The time the Council has spent on the tree code has been very valuable and she thanked
staff and citizens for being patient with the time it takes to synthetize inputs and develop good policy. Some
of points that have resonated with her are the difficulty to enforce prohibitions, people who are determined
to take trees down and people who love trees and therefore bought property full of trees and end up being
penalized.
Councilmember Olson referred to the question raised during Audience Comments about why the City is
doing this. She said the environmental component was the driver, trees are an important part of carbon
sequestration and a component in climate change. Protecting the tree canopy not only helps with that but
also enhance the aesthetics. With regard to a Heritage Tree Program, she would support a site specific tree
program and if it is required in the UFMP, she would support a voluntary program. With regard to views,
she referred to vegetation used as a fence. The City legislates how high fences can be, and if someone uses
vegetation as a fence, it should not be allowed to be 20 feet tall and block their neighbor's light or view.
Mr. Lien said the City has regulated hedge height in the past, but that was removed from the code before
he came to the City 13 years go. Regulating hedge height requires the City to be arbitrator between
neighbors; one person wants the hedge for privacy and the other wants the hedge removed for view reasons.
Councilmember Olson commented the code could be clear if vegetation used as a fence blocked views, it
needed to comply with the fence height regulations. That did not mean a property owner could not have a
tree in that area, but they could not use a hedge as a fence.
Councilmember K. Johnson thanked Mr. Lien for taking a comprehensive look at the Tree Code Stage 2,
incorporating a range of options and asking the Council to narrow it down for the Planning Board. She was
unsure if that was what staff wanted or if the Planning Board wanted to continue to look at the range of
options. Ms. Hope said staff was not asking Council to eliminate any of the options tonight, but to determine
next steps for the Planning Board to begin that work. All the other items will come back to the Council in
the future.
Mr. Lien said the Planning Board was seeking clear direction from the Council regarding what direction to
go and what to look at. Tree retention on private property not related to development is the most difficult.
If the Council wants to pursue a Heritage Tree Program, that is pretty easy and there are a few options. With
regard to tree retention on private property, Council appeared to be interested in an option that did not
require a fee; tracking tree removal with no fee. Additional Council direction is needed regarding when a
permit is required, whether it is above X number of trees or is it not allowed and a property owner can only
remove two trees, or is it limited by size, etc. He asked when a permit would be required.
Councilmember K. Johnson agreed with moving the Heritage Tree Program to the Planning Board. She
was also interested in wildlife and habitat corridors, relaying her understanding that they were protected
under the critical area ordinance but there are large trees in parks and other areas so she encouraged the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 19
Packet Pg. 32
Planning Board to tackle that issue. Wildlife and habitat corridors are important for the tree canopy as well
as salmon recovery efforts.
Council President Paine agreed with having the Planning Board look at a Heritage Tree Program. She
supported a free or low cost tree permit for removal of any significant trees, and suggested having the
Planning Board consider Options 2 and 3 along with data from the canopy assessment. She also agreed with
looking at wildlife and habitat corridors.
Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with providing general direction to the Planning Board regarding
Options 2 and 3 and have them consider a no cost tracking permit. The clock is ticking on the emergency
ordinance so there is some pressure to ensure the 24" and larger trees are addressed via an update from the
Planning Board that will come to Council. He expressed support for Option 1 for a Heritage Tree Program.
He has seen how some of the more restrictive options such as Option 3 have been used with buildings where
people have applied for landmark status on something they do not own and have no interest in and how that
has been weaponized.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with a Heritage Tree Program. She recalled the Floretum Garden Club
and the Tree Board had discussed that and Councilmember Olson provided an example of program that did
not need to be codified. She supported doing districting or establishing view/no view areas in the UFMP.
Edmonds' real estate market is flourishing and houses with trees are priced differently than houses with
views. She was not sure how to diplomatically address view versus no view in the code. She agreed with
focusing on wildlife and habitat corridors, no net loss and net ecological gain. A lot of it is related to critical
areas but there are also wildlife corridors in non -critical areas. With regard to incentives, she was concerned
with opened up a ball of wax, especially related to stormwater issues. She summarized habitat, permitting
and view corridors were her top three.
Councilmember L. Johnson recommended approaching this as a shared responsibility; the overwhelming
responsibility should not be on one subset of the community or homeowners over another. She agreed with
Options 2 and 3 for tree retention on private property not related to development, noting the canopy
assessment will guide that. The canopy assessment will also guide Option 6, whether all residential property
should be required to have a minimum number of trees. Without the information provided by the canopy
assessment, it is difficult to decide.
With regard to a Heritage Tree Program, Councilmember L. Johnson supported Options 1 or 2 related to a
voluntary program. With regard to view corridors, this is related to the equity issue and providing a balance.
A number of properties have already been cleared, is it fair to put the burden on those who have not yet
removed trees? It will be a delicate balance and will depend on the canopy assessment. She questioned what
constitutes a view corridor, observing there are a lot of different views. She referred to comment related to
light and asked whether access to light was prioritized for someone living in a view corridor but not for
other homeowners which she felt was an inequity issue. The City does not want to be in the business of
defining and regulating views and should leave that up to homeowners to do amongst themselves. With
regard to wildlife and habitat corridors, she cited the importance of education and incentives. She supported
certification for wildlife and habitat corridors similar to a Heritage Tree Program. She was not sold on
incentives but neither did she want to rule them out. She would support incentives that were easier to do
and did not require as much staff time to monitor.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was not prepared to provide her arguments for and against options
tonight. She misunderstood what the Council was doing with this agenda item and will not be stating her
preferences but is listening to everyone else and has a good understanding of their priorities.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 20
Packet Pg. 33
7.1.a
With regard to the issue of light, Councilmember Olson agreed that related to equity; it could arise anywhere
and was not exclusive to the bowl. Blocking light can be an issue for someone's garden. She strongly
favored incentives, agreeing they were complicated to figure out but that was the way to go. The
environment is important, and instead of spending money on enforcement and punishment, she preferred
to provide incentives for having the right tree in the right place. She felt the City could get better results
with incentives rather than punishments.
Mr. Lien said he did not assume the Council would complete this tonight; it was intended to provide some
guidance. The Council has provided clear direction on the Heritage Tree Program. The direction regarding
tree retention on private property not related to development seemed to be no permit but tracking for the
removal of a certain number of trees. He will come back to Council to discuss views and habitat corridors
in more depth so Council can provide clearer direction. Council agreed. Mr. Lien referenced comments
regarding light, noting some jurisdictions have regulations related to solar access..
Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. He relayed Council President Paine and he conferred during the
recess and decided Item 8.5 would be postponed to a future meeting.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST,
TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO
CHAPTER 17.75 ECDC, ENTITLED "OUTDOOR DINING," AND A RELATED SECTION
IN CHAPTER 17.70 ECDC
Development Services Director Shane Hope advised this is not about outdoor dining on sidewalks or streets.
Planning Manager Rob Chave advised this is a Planning Board recommendation on an interim ordinance
Council adopted at the end of December related to outdoor dining. Although the ordinance was listed, it
was not included in packet. He displayed the one -page ordinance and explained on private property, dining
is allowed as an outdoor use. Until the interim ordinance, an additional 10% of the indoor seating was
allowed as outdoor seating or 12 seats whichever was greater and beyond those limits a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) was required. He commented 10% of the interior seating or 12 seats was not very much and
especially during COVID, it came to the City's attention that restaurants needed more flexibility. A CUP
goes to the Hearing Examiner and costs thousands of dollars and takes up to three months for approval,
making any significant outdoor dining cost and time prohibitive for a typical restaurant/small business.
Mr. Chave explained the interim ordinance adopted by Council removed the requirement for a CUP,
clarified the need for a building permit for any structures, and for retaining any ADA accessible parking
spaces. The original code did not have a limitation on the amount of outdoor dining; the interim ordinance
had a limit up to 50% of the existing interior seating and up to 30 seats. The interim ordinance was more
generous than what was allowed without a permit, but not as open ended as the original code. The Planning
Board held a public hearing and recommended making the interim ordinance permanent. A public hearing
at City Council is scheduled on June 15t1i.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked how 30 seats versus 40 or 20 was decided when the original was 12. Mr.
Chave it was 12 or 10% of the indoor seating whichever was more. Thirty seats seemed like a reasonable
number, it could be lower or higher. The 50% was not a magic number but it clearly indicates that outdoor
dining was to be a secondary part of the overall operation, not the main part. Under the interim code, the
additional outdoor dining could be 50% of the interior or 30 seats. For example, a small takeout place with
just a kitchen and no interior seating could have 30 outdoor seats.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 21
Packet Pg. 34
7.1.a
Councilmember Buckshnis said the Planning Board minutes did not indicate how 30 seats was determined.
She recalled the Planning Board asked about safety issues. Mr. Chave said there is a provision in the interim
ordinance that states any dining adjacent to vehicle parking shall be separated by landscaping, curb stop
wall or other suitable barrier. That was not in the original code and was added to the interim ordinance as
a safety feature.
5. RESOLUTION ADOPTING COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE
This item was postponed to future meeting.
9. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas cautioned the Council not to throw things on the agenda for campaign
purposes. She was seeing campaigning occurring and did think that gave the citizens a fair shake if
Councilmembers were using Council meetings for campaigning.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported Memorial Day was wonderful. She went to the cemetery and
visited her parents, both of whom were WWII veterans, and her nephew, a Marine serving in the Middle
East. Memorial Day is very important for those whose family members served in the military. She was very
proud of her parents and her family for serving in the military particularly during WWII.
Councilmember Olson reported she was excited to be working toward having 411' of July events. It will be
a full press from the entire village to make it happen. She invite volunteers to reach out to the Chamber of
Commerce sooner rather than later. There will be a lot of volunteer slots to fill but people with backgrounds
directing traffic are particularly needed. She thanked the sponsors and large supporters, they are needed and
appreciated.
Councilmember Distelhorst reported on the nice event yesterday at the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery and
thanked staff, the local VFW and also the Cemetery Board for organizing it. He relayed gun violence is
preventable; there were some victories at the legislature this year, but there are many areas where a lot more
work can be done. This is a policy choice and he hoped it will continue to be a priority for Edmonds,
reducing preventable gun violence in the community.
Councilmember Distelhorst reported June 1st is the start of Pride Month. It was sad to see the discriminatory
bills from certain state legislatures, especially targeting trans youth, which is representative of how much
work still needs to be done in Washington and in other states to ensure LGBTQ+ communities have the
same civil rights, healthcare rights, and housing rights afforded everyone. He said we can celebrate and we
can do good work.
Council President Paine recognized the start of Pride Month. She recognized all the wonderful support she
has had from managers and directors in her professional life who have been LGTBQ and the generosity of
their support and interest in learning more about public administration. Memorial Day was a lot of fun and
she was appreciative of the event at the Edmonds Cemetery and all the volunteers.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mayor Nelson for being at the end of the drive -through Memorial Day
event at the cemetery. She expressed appreciation to President Biden for honoring the victims of Black
Wall Street that marked 100 years yesterday, 100 years ago today Black Wall Street was devastated in
Tulsa, Oklahoma. She found it very heartwarming and a wonderful gesture that shows the President
recognition that things happened and the need to understand the equity aspect. She recognized the start of
Pride Month, recalling three years ago she was on a cruise ship on June 1st along with Maureen Judge, a
fun time to be celebrating the joy of being a human being. She said everyone has right the right to do and
say and be happy.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 22
Packet Pg. 35
7.1.a
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Mayor Nelson for the proclamation recognizing Gun Violence
Awareness Day. She also thanked the three guests, local gun violence prevention advocates, for attending
and for their tireless work to raise awareness and address gun violence in the United States. Gun violence
is a rampant public health issue. A lot of work needs to be done and she appreciated the work being done
to raise awareness. Friday, June 4th is Wear Orange Day, more information about events is available on
wearorange.org. She recognized the beginning of Pride Month, June 1st and wished Happy Pride to all.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson also recognized the start of Pride Month. He reported COVID numbers continue to decrease
in Snohomish County, now at 129/100,000; although a decrease, that was the height of the first wave back
in early March 2020. In Snohomish County 63% of residents have initiated one vaccine shot, which is on
the way to 70%. He looked forward to wearing orange on Friday in recognition of the gun violence that
sadly plagues communities.
�Kll 11IGU -19\I
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:08 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 23
Packet Pg. 36
7.1.a
Public Comment for 6/1/21 Council Meeting:
From: Ken Reidy
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 1:35 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>; Public Comment (Council)
<publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Cc: Hope, Shane <Shane.Hope@edmondswa.gov>; Williams, Phil
<Phil.Wllliams@edmondswa.gov>; Taraday, Jeff <jeff@lighthouselawgroup.com>; Nelson,
Michael <Michael.Nelson @edmondswa.gov>; Council <Council@edmondswa.gov>; Judge,
Maureen <Maureen.Judge@edmondswa.gov>; Neill Hoyson, Jessica
<Jessica. Neil IHoyson @edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comments for the June 1, 2021 City Council Meeting
My Edmonds News reported in January 2021:
-Neither Nelson nor Neill Hoyson answered the questions we have raised. We have again asked
the mayor for an interview.
-Susan Paine and Laura Johnson have not answered questions we sent them about this.
Why is Council working on a Code of Conduct when nobody enforces the Code of Conduct and
Code of Ethics that are already in place?
Specifically:
For Neill Hoyson:
10.1 GENERAL CODE OF CONDUCT
The City's primary function is to provide service to the citizens of Edmonds. To achieve that
goal, all employees are expected to treat the public as their most valued customer.
CU
All employees are expected to serve the public in a professional manner, which is courteous, o
efficient and helpful. c
Ms. Hoyson has refused to answer all my emails. Despite this, she still works for the City. For r
example, she prepared an agenda packet for Council about extending the acting appointment 9
of Jim Lawless in January of 2021. Why was she allowed to make her subjective points about
r
intent, etc. to Council when she refuses to answer the emails and questions from citizens
represented by Council? Should she be allowed to participate in Council meetings prior to the
Mayor informing Council whether he ever will enforce 10.1 GENERAL CODE OF CONDUCT? r
r
For Nelson, Paine and Laura Johnson: Q
Code of Ethics:
Keep the community informed on municipal affairs and encourage communications between
the citizens and all municipal officers. Emphasize friendly and courteous service to the public
and each other; seek to improve the quality of public service, and confidence of
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 24
Packet Pg. 37
7.1.a
citizens. Refusing to answer citizen emails is not friendly and courteous service to the public
and certainly does not improve the quality of public service or confidence of citizens.
Please do not pass a new code of conduct without openly discussing ongoing violations
regarding the current Codes we already have and disclosing to citizens how the Codes we
already have will be enforced now and in the future.
My Edmonds News also reporting in January of 2021 that:
The three other councilmembers said the city never alerted them. Diane Buckshnis, Vivian
Olson and Kristiana Johnson told us they only found out about the domestic violence and career
concerns after Olson obtained the federal records and sent them to human resources, the
mayor and council.
So, it is not just citizens that are kept in the dark?
Again, please do not pass a new code of conduct without openly discussing ongoing violations
regarding the current Codes we already have and disclosing to citizens how the Codes we
already have will be enforced now and in the future.
Please also review the Code of Ethics, expand it so it covers City Staff and provide procedures
for enforcement. Please consider establishing external infrastructure and process
that counsels and mediates when conduct and ethics become a concern.
Thank you.
From: Bill Herzig
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 10:48 AM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Single Family Zoning in Edmonds
N
Edmonds is already a fairly dense city as measured against other towns in the Puget Sound N
region, and we have 700 units, mostly multi -family in various stages of development at present. o
This number puts Edmonds ahead of it comprehensive plan growth targets. o
Edmonds already has over 36% of it's housing stock in multi family housing, likely on its way to
over 40%, with the current units in development. E
r
Over 60% of Edmonds citizens surveyed stated they did not want the Single Family zoning Q
changed.
There is NO JUSTIFICATION for eliminating single family zoning in face of these statistics!!
We do not want Edmonds trashed by developers like Ballard has been.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 25
Packet Pg. 38
7.1.a
We will be watching the City Council to see if they do what the Citizens of Edmonds clearly
want and deserve, or if they are operating on a political agenda against the will of the Citizens
of Edmonds.
Bill Herzig
Edmonds, WA
From: Audrey McLaughlin
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 6:01 PM
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Yost Pool Comments
Hi there,
My name is Audrey. I've lived in Edmonds my whole life and had some of my best memories
and friendships have come from yost pool. I always loved the casual feel of our little community
pool. I really have been missing swimming there and was excited to get back into it since covid.
Then I read that our pool was being taken over by a private swim team and we would need to
try out. I think that we should do everything in our power to prevent this so that everyone can
enjoy having a place to swim without the pressure of harsh competition. I also think this is not
fair because many people do not have access to places to practice or the money to be in a
private swim team in the first place. This would remove many of the things people love about
yost. Even if the cascade had no other place to practice, surely we could incorporate time for
the penguins to practice so that anyone could swim if they wanted to. I hope you consider.
Audrey McLaughlin
N
O
N
From: debbie mccallum o
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 7:28 AM Q
0
To: Public Comment (Council) <publiccomments@edmondswa.gov>
Subject: Public Comment E
Citizens of Edmonds.... a
Private property is the foundation of every right we have and is legally protected by law and the
Constitution. When did we, the citizens of Edmonds, grant the right to create and impose
restrictive codes to seven people? Trees on private property, with the exception of those in
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 26
Packet Pg. 39
7.1.a
environmentally sensitive areas, should never be under city authority. Certainly it is
unfortunate when any sizeable tree is removed, but that decision is the right of the tax paying
property owner and has absolutely no place in city discretion. In an urban setting with limited
property sizes, "heritage" trees are often times dangerous and can be a nuisance and unwanted
for a variety of reasons, none of them the 'business' of over -reaching council members or city
employees.
If you believe that the city will reach responsible conclusions about tree removal consider the
plight of my neighbors: a cedar located on level ground stands on their shared property line less
than fifteen feet from the foundations of their homes, with five inches of space between the
trunk and each driveway, and, astride all utilities, including water and gas. In addition, the tree
is a constant source of debris which falls into the gutters and on the roofs with massive
threatening branches that hang over both structures. They were denied the ability to rid
themselves of (their) tree, which is clearly a hazard.
The City of Edmonds has used Covid to surreptitiously, and successfully, mask decisions that
affect all citizens, confident in the knowledge that the majority of us are not paying attention
because there are not in -person meetings that can be attended or easy -to -watch meetings on
the local channel. If there is any dispute to this fact I would remind city officials of the open
council meeting a few years ago where the public, so tightly packed that there was standing
room only, even in the hallways, vociferously argued against any misplaced notion of control
that the city dreamed they might usurp concerning trees. The message was loud, clear and
sometimes angry: our trees are beyond the scope and control of the city, with the exception of
those within critical areas. The institution of private property is our right by law and any action
by the council to supersede is an infringement of our civil liberties.
Debbie McCallum
N
O
N
O
W
O
r
C
d
E
L
V
Q
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 20221
Page 27
Packet Pg. 40
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/8/2021
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #247554 through #247635 dated June 3, 2021 for $454,377.42 (re -issued check
#247590 $465.84) and wire payment of $334.05.
Approval of payroll checks #64685 through #64695 dated May 28, 2021 in the amount of $53,758.65 for
Law Enforcement Support Services contract retroactive pay, direct deposit and checks #64696 through
#64699 for $622,919.59, benefit checks #64700 through #64704 and wire payments of $649,943.53 for
the pay period May 16, 2021 through May 31, 2021.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 06-03-21
wire 05-28-21
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 06-03-21
Police Support retro
payroll summary 05-31-21
payroll benefits 05-31-21
Packet Pg. 41
7.2.a
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
247554
6/3/2021 076040 911 SUPPLY INC
247555 6/3/2021 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
INV-2-10305
INV-2-10305 - EDMONDS PD - AWAI
BLACKINTON COMMENDATION BAI
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
BLACKINTON STAR MEDALS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
INV-2-10366
INV-2-10366 - EDMONDS PD - MOO
BALLISTIC VEST
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
CONCEALABLE CARRIER
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
TRAUMA PLATE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
EXTERNAL CARRIER
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
SAFARILAND ID PANEL
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
HEAT PRESS EDMONDS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
2 NAME TAPES
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
2 VELCRO
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.1 % Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Total
15-89337
INT - TAGALOG - 9Z0172807
INT - TAGALOG - 9Z0172807
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-89662
INT - CAMBODIAN - XZ0817470
Page: 1
aD
L
3
c
�a
.y
Amoun 0
a
aD
r
CU
d
97.5(
N
732.5(
m
20.2E u
m
88.4<
c
880.0( f°
0
L
80.0(
a
20.0( E
ca
200.0( ,-
0
10.0( >
0
a
10.0( Q
16.0( N
c%)
10.0( m
0
123.8( E
2,288.51 'M
c
aD
170.0( t
U
�a
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
247555
6/3/2021
070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
(Continued)
INT - CAMBODIAN - XZ0817470
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-89690
INT- ROMANIAN - 1A0350272
INT- ROMANIAN - 1A0350272
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-89712
INTERPRETER MALAYALAM P1591(
INTERPRETER MALAYALAM P1591(
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-89743
INT - TAGALOG - 9Z0172807
INT - TAGALOG - 9Z0172807
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-89757
INT- SOMALI - lA0443989
INT- SOMALI - lA0443989
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total:
247556
6/3/2021
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
45186
F.A.C. - PEST CONTROL
F.A.C. - PEST CONTROL
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
45290
WWTP: 5/26/21 PEST CONTROL SE
Pest Control Service
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
247557
6/3/2021
078373 ACHIEVEMENT MARINE
1297
WWTP: REPAIR DIESEL TRANSFEF
REPAIR DIESEL TRANSFER PUMP
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
7.2.a
Page: 2
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
170.0( u
L_
170.0(
m
170.0(
m
c
a�
170.0(
�a
0
170.0( `>,
1,020.0( a
E
U
325.0( IS
�a
33.8( o
L
a
a
Q
73.0(
N
7.5� o
439.35 c
E
2
450.0( U
c
a�
46.8( E
496.8( U
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 43
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 3
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun N
247558
6/3/2021
064088 ADT COMMERCIAL
140119378
LIBRARY - LABOR & INSTALL OF AC
0
m
LIBRARY - LABOR & INSTALL OF AC
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
618.5( u
10.4% Sales Tax
L
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
64.3,
Total:
682.8,
m
247559
6/3/2021
001528 AM TEST INC
121614
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A005529-55"
v
SAMPLES #21-A005529-5530
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
80.0(
121615
WWTP: SAMPLES 21-A005298-530z
(D
SAMPLES 21-A005298-5304
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
435.0(
121616
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A006231-62"
SAMPLES #21-A006231-6232
o
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
80.0( a
121617
WWTP: SAMPLES #21-A006132-61
SAMPLES #21-A006132-6138
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
395.0( u
Total:
990.0( o
247560
6/3/2021
074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC
6842288
JUNE PREMIUMS
1i
>
0
LEOFF PREMIUMS
a
009.000.39.517.20.23.10
7,887.9, Q
FIRE PREMIUMS
617.000.51.589.40.23.10
1,226.9' N
Total :
9,114.81 c
247561
6/3/2021
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
23477781
PARKS MAINT CUSTOM SCREEN P
ca
c
PARKS MAINT CUSTOM SCREEN P
N
E
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
177.3( 'ca
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
18.4z
6560000049507
WWTP:5/26/21 UNIFORMS,TOWEL
E
Mats/Towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
U
51.4E
Q
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247561 6/3/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
Uniforms: 3 Lab Coats $0.17 each =
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
656000049510
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
656000049513
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
656000051831
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
7.2.a
Page: 4
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
0.5' u
L
5.3E
N
0.0E
v
6.31 c
(D
M
61.1E
�a
0
29.5E >%
M
a
3.0,
U
4-
1.6' 0
Ta
6.1' o
a
a
6.1' Q
6.1' Cl)
0
6.1' o
6.0£ 9
0.1
0.6z t
U
�a
Q
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247561 6/3/2021 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
247562 6/3/2021 064452 ARMSTRONG SERVICES
247563 6/3/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
656000051833
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
Total:
4734
WWTP: 5/2021 JANITORIAL & COVI
5/2021 JANITORIAL SERVICE
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total:
121115
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.25% Sales Tax
7.2.a
Page: 5
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
aD
0.6z 'D
r
U
d
0.6z
0.6z Y
m
0.6" v
m
c
9.2�
c
19.1(
0
1.5E `5%
�a
a
1.4- E
420.1:.�
0
�a
880.0( o
880.0( a
Q
N
50.5- c
m
50.5- N
E
52.0z fd
U
145.1, a0i
E
145.1, U
�a
Q
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247563 6/3/2021 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
247564 6/3/2021 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY
247565 6/3/2021 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.25% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.25% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
121161 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Printing #
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
UB Outsourcing area Postage #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
10.25% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00
10.25% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
10.25% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
Total
61511 INT - SPANISH - 1 A043661 0
INT - SPANISH - 1 A043661 0
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
61617 INT - SPANISH - XZ0242588
INT - SPANISH - XZ0242588
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
780241
UNIT 58 - PARTS
UNIT 58 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
7.2.a
Page: 6
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
5.1 £ 'D
r
U
d
5.1 £
5.3<
m
t
U
46.8( 45
m
c
46.8(
c
48.2<
0
140.1, `>+
�a
a
140.1(
4.8( u
0
4.8( >
0
L
4.9z a
895.65 Q
N
Cl)
0
100.0( c
E
100.0E u
200.0( };
c
W
E
t
U
1,061.0E
Q
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
247565 6/3/2021 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC (Continued)
781603
CM758277
CM769963
247566 6/3/2021 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1253657
247567 6/3/2021 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 9860 YOGA
247568 6/3/2021 065565 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET 3-M721 K993
PO # Description/Account
10.1 % Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
UNIT 451 -PARTS/ HINGE
UNIT 451 -PARTS/ HINGE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.25% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
UNIT 62 - PARTS
UNIT 62 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.25% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
FLEET CREDIT FOR PARTS RETUR
FLEET CREDIT FOR PARTS RETUR
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
FLEET GEAR ASSEMBLY RETURNE
FLEET GEAR ASSEMBLY RETURNE
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.1 % Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 671.90 GF
FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 671.90 GF
511.000.77.548.68.34.12
Total
9860 YOGA ONLINE INSTRUCTION
9860 YOGA ONLINE INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
E184PO - 2021 FORD POLICE VEHI
E184PO - 2021 FORD POLICE VEHI
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
7.2.a
Page: 7
W
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
107.11 U
53.9,
m
t
5.5:
m
c
18.5E M
c
1.9(
0
L
-750.0( a
E
-400.0( U
4-
0
-40.4( >
57.7( o
a
a
Q
1,222.6" N
1,222.61 Cl)
0
E
630.0( R
630.0( U
c
a�
E
t
U
49,797.0E
Q
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247568 6/3/2021 065565 065565 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET
247569 6/3/2021 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
247570
247571
247572
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
26705162
26705177
6/3/2021 003320 CASCADE MACHINERY & ELECTRIC 482360
6/3/2021 076816 CITY OF EDMONDS VEBA TRUST
6/3/2021 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
405712_LS U P
8498310300732547
PO #
Description/Account
Total
CANON 2501F
CONTRACT CHARGE 5/2021
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
BW METER USAGE APRIL
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
CL METER USAGE
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
CANON COPIER
CANON COPIER
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
Total
SEWER - INSPECT AND REPAIRED
SEWER - INSPECT AND REPAIRED
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
10.25% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
Total
LAW SUPPORT VEBA FUNDING
LAW SUPPORT VEBA FUNDING
001.000.41.521.11.23.15
Total
PUBLIC WRKS - DIGITAL CABLE
Public Works - 7110 210th S SW
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
Public Works - 7110 210th S SW
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
Public Works - 7110 210th S SW
7.2.a
Page: 8
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
49,797.0E 0
U
d
L_
26.4,
N
2.6 1
U
14.9E
m
c
4.5E M
c
�a
212.5E o
22.1" a
283.31
U
0
110.0(
0
11.2E a
121.2f Q
N
A
11,000.0( m
11,000.0( N
E
M
2.3(
aD
11.0E t
U
�a
Q
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 9
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
247572
6/3/2021
070323 COMCAST BUSINESS
(Continued)
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
11.0E
Public Works - 7110 210th S SW
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
11.0E
Public Works - 7110 210th S SW
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
10.61
Tota I :
46.1 f
247573
6/3/2021
005965 CUES INC
587278
SEWER - PARTS
SEWER - PARTS
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
695.4E
Freight
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
17.4-
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
74.1 E
Tota I :
787.0'
247574
6/3/2021
006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
3368364
PLANNING -LEGAL AD
Publication of RFQ: Comp Plan Gap
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
49.0(
3368365
PLANNING -LEGAL AD
Publication of RFQ: Waterfront Analy;
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
58.8(
Tota I :
107.8(
247575
6/3/2021
061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03
INV677882
INV677882 - EDMONDS PD
CALIBRATE RADAR - AS01981
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.0(
FUEL SURCHARGE
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
30.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
10.4(
Total :
110.4(
247576
6/3/2021
064531 DINES, JEANNIE
21-4089
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
city council meeting minutes 5/8 and
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 10
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun
247576
6/3/2021
064531
DINES, JEANNIE
(Continued)
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
864.0(
Tota I :
864.0(
247577
6/3/2021
076172
DK SYSTEMS
27983
F.A.C. - SERVICE & PARTS ON BOIL
F.A.C. - SERVICE & PARTS ON BOIL
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
2,024.9E
PREVAILING WAGE
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
20.0(
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
19.7,
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
212.61
Total:
2,277.31
247578
6/3/2021
075153
DOPPS, MARIA
59506
INT - SPANISH - 1 A01 34718
INT - SPANISH - 1 A0134718
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0(
59939
INT - SPANISH - 8Z0579348
INT - SPANISH - 8Z0579348
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
100.0(
Tota I :
200.0(
247579
6/3/2021
007253
DUNN LUMBER
7999574
UNIT 14 - SUPPLIES
UNIT 14 - SUPPLIES
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
162.0E
10.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
17.0,
Tota I :
179.1(
247580
6/3/2021
076610
EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
2229
WWTP: PO 481 TAPCUBE
PO 481 TAPCUBE
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
6.5�
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
0.6�
2303
WWTP: PO 481 SOCKET ADAPTER
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247580 6/3/2021 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
PO 481 SOCKET ADAPTER
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2307
WWTP: PO 481 SPRAYERS
PO 481 SPRAYERS
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2312
PM SUPPLIES: SHOVEL, KNEELINC
PM SUPPLIES: SHOVEL, KNEELINC
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
2315
WWTP: PO 481 SHOVEL
PO 481 SHOVEL
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
2318
CITY HALL - PLUNGER
CITY HALL - PLUNGER
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
2320
WATER - SUPPLIES
WATER - SUPPLIES
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
2321
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - SUF
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - SUF
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7.2.a
Page: 11
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
23.9E u
L
2.4�
N
m
31.5-, v
3.2f (D
a�
c
45.9E
0
4.7E >+
M
a
E
27.9E .i
2.9• 0
Ta
0
L
16.71 a
Q
1.7z
N
Cl)
0
32.4, c
3.3E
c
19.9E E
t
2.0E um
Q
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
247580
6/3/2021
076610
076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE (Continued)
247581
6/3/2021
008705
EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808
3-03575
3-07490
3-07525
3-07709
3-09350
3-09800
3-29875
3-38565
6-01127
6-01130
6-01140
PO # Description/Account
Total
LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S'
LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL S'
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING F
HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING F
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE
LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S
LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST S
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i
LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD i
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R
LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT R
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR /
LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 c
SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 c
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
WWTP: 5/2021 METER 2088: 200 21'
5/2021 200 2ND AVE S / METER 20
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
WWTP: 5/2021 METER 9439: 200 21`
5/2021 200 2ND AVE S / METER 94;
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
WWTP: 5/2021 METER 5010484: 20,
7.2.a
Page: 12
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
226.6 j 0
U
d
L_
53.9,
N
m
460.3'
m
c
109.8, �
c
�a
58.6( o
�a
a
53.91 E
U
114.4E 0
�a
0
53.9z a
a
Q
53.9z N
0
53.9z N
E
203.0�
c
a�
E
23.7E u
�a
Q
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247581 6/3/2021 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
247582 6/3/2021 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR191293
247583 6/3/2021 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
247584 6/3/2021 075673 FARMER, MARIA
AR192365
PO # Description/Account
5/2021 200 2ND AVE S / METER 50'
423.000.76.535.80.47.64
Total
CITY CLERK COPIER METER READ
copier meter read
001.000.25.514.30.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.45.00
WWTP:4/6-5/15/21 COPIES
4/6-5/15/21 COPIES
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
Total
EDH927687 PLANNING -LEGAL AD
PLN2021-0016 (652 3rd AVE N)-
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
EDH927709 PLANNING -LEGAL AD
PLN2019-0055 (8629 238tth ST SW)
001.000.62.558.60.41.40
EDH928123 CITY NOTICES
city notices
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
Total
04092021 INT - SPANISH - 1 A0139130
INT - SPANISH - 1 A01 39130
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
04212021 INT - SPANISH - 1 A0154211
INT - SPANISH - 1 A0154211
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total :
7.2.a
Page: 13
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 14
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
Ea
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun N
247585
6/3/2021
066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
WAEVE181707
WWTP: PO 572 JUG SAWZIT NF
0
m
PO 572 JUG SAWZIT NF
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
85.5, u
Freight
L
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
21.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
11.0E
Total:
117.6( u
247586
6/3/2021
075871 FLOW TECHNOLOGIES INC
E6GB.PMT 5
E6GB PMT NO.5 THRU 4/29/21
c
E6GB PMT NO.5 THRU 4/29/21
(D
423.000.75.594.35.65.30
68,414.6, -a
E6GB.Ret 5
423.000.223.400
-3,098.4� o
Total:
65,316.1:
�a
247587
6/3/2021
078375 GAURAV & GENIA KAPOOR
2-07200
#40278989-803 HJ3 UTILITY REFUN
a
#40278989-803 HJ3 Utility refund duE
ff
411.000.233.000
148.5( U
Total:
148.5( c
247588
6/3/2021
076542 GRANICUS
140228
CIVIC STREAMING, AGENDAAND K
o
civic streaming
a
001.000.25.514.30.48.00
1,417.5' Q
10.4% Sales Tax
�-
001.000.25.514.30.48.00
147.4' N
Total :
1,564.9' c
247589
6/3/2021
012560 HACH COMPANY
12470543
WWTP: PO 553 TUBE 1/2 OD UNIOI
o
PO 553 TUBE 1/2 OD UNION STRAIT
E
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
16.1 E 'M
Freight
z
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
69.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
°'
t
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
8.9E
12474435
WWTP: PO 553 COD STD SOLN, PII
Q
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
247589 6/3/2021 012560 HACH COMPANY (Continued)
12474517
247590 6/3/2021 012560 HACH COMPANY 12407270
247591 6/3/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2072320
3014076
4053988
PO # Description/Account
PO 553 COD STD SOLN, PIPET TIP:
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
WWTP: PO 553 EZ COD RECYCLIN
PO 553 EZ COD RECYCLING KIT, T
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
WWTP: PO 527 COVER ASSY
O 527 COVER ASSY
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
PM SUPPLIES: FAN SPRAY, PRIMEI
PM SUPPLIES: FAN SPRAY, PRIMEI
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM SUPPLIES: JACK POSTS, STAKI
PM SUPPLIES: JACK POSTS, STAKI
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM SUPPLIES: CLAMP SET, DUCT
PM SUPPLIES: CLAMP SET, DUCT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7.2.a
Page: 15
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
m
3,338.4.E u
L
347.1 £
N
m
t
354.5, u
36.8 c
4,172.1
c
�a
0
352.0(
�a
a
69.9E E
43.8� u
465.8l o
0
0
L
a
168.2 - Q
17.3< N
Cl)
0
127.8 N
E
13.1 R
U
c
a�
25.0< E
t
U
2.5£
Q
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247591 6/3/2021 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
5015182
PM SUPPLIES: TARP, NYLON ROPE
PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER, COUPLINC
130.000.64.536.50.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
130.000.64.536.50.31.00
618201
PM SUPPLIES: PVC BUSHING
PM SUPPLIES: PVC BUSHING
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
70429
PM SUPPLIES: SEALANT, PLIERS, I
PM SUPPLIES: SEALANT, PLIERS, 1
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
70462
PM SUPPLIES: TOTES, ROLLER TR
PM SUPPLIES: TOTES, ROLLER TR
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7052658
PM SUPPLIES: HAMMER DRILL, ST
PM SUPPLIES: HAMMER DRILL, ST
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7074568
PM SUPPLIES: CONCRETE
PM SUPPLIES: CONCRETE
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
7196202
PM SUPPLIES: PLANTS
PM SUPPLIES: PLANTS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
7.2.a
Page: 16
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
22.9`,
2.3E Y
m
9.5.
m
c
0.9£ M
c
�a
80.0E o
L
8.2E a
E
216.9' u
0
22.3, >
0
L
Q
a
146.9E Q
15.1,
0
0
45.3E
2
4.6 1 U
c
a�
143.61 E
U
co
Q
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
247591
6/3/2021
067862
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
(Continued)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
95875
PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER, COUPLINC
PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER, COUPLINC
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
247592
6/3/2021
076488
HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG
CD21-01
HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC
HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
CD21-02
HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC
HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
CD21-03
HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC
HULBERT PHOTOGRAPHY SERVIC
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
Total
247593
6/3/2021
060165
HWA GEOSCIENCES INC
31718
EOJA SERVICES THRU 5/21/2021
EOJA SERVICES THRU 5/21/2021
421.000.74.594.34.41.00
Total
247594
6/3/2021
073548
INDOFF INCORPORATED
3425860
STORAGE BOXES
Storage boxes
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
Total
247595
6/3/2021
061546
INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY
203431
WWTP: FILTERMAT REPLACEMEW
FILTERMAT REPLACEMENT FOR 4
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Freight
7.2.a
Page: 17
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
14.7� 'D
r
U
d
L
35.6E
N
3.6E
1,127.5i U
m
c
d
250.0(
c
�a
0
250.0(
�a
a
250.0(
750.0( Z
4-
0
7a
0
5,941.0E a
5,941.OF Q
N
Cl)
43.9< m
0
4.5,
'M
c
a�
74.2z t
U
�a
Q
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247595 6/3/2021 061546 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS SUPPLY
247596
247597
247598
247599
247600
6/3/2021 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
6/3/2021 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS
6/3/2021 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
300-10087391
6475
1.1.11'1
6/3/2021 076475 JVP LEGAL TRANSLATION SERVICES 59281
6/3/2021 075590 MOBILE GUARD
INV00660917
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total :
FLEET - PARTS/ WIPER BLADES
FLEET - PARTS/ WIPER BLADES
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20
Total
FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC
Jun-2021 Fiber Optics Internet
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
10.4% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
Total
WWTP: PO 474 SODIUM HYPOCHL
PO 474 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
WA Hazadous Substance Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
Total
INT - VIETNAMESE - XZ0427489
INT - VIETNAMESE - XZ0427489
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total
VERIZON-MG CLOUD MT ANNUAL:
Verizon - MG Cloud MT Annual Servi(
7.2.a
Page: 18
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
a�
14.8z
r
U
d
9.2( ,L
98.3'
N
V
m
157.3f
m
c
16.3
173.7°
c
�a
0
590.0( a
61.3E •E
651.3( U
4-
0
�a
0
3,674.4z a
a
25.7, Q
N
382.1 z o%)
4,082.3( m
0
E
M
100.0(
100.0(
a�
E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 59
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247600 6/3/2021 075590 MOBILE GUARD
247601 6/3/2021 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
Tota I :
26101
LOG CABIN - CLEANED GUTTERS i
LOG CABIN - CLEANED GUTTERS i
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
26102
PARKS SHELTERS - ROOF & GUTTI
PARKS SHELTERS - ROOF & GUTTI
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
26103
PARK STORAGE SHED ROOF CLEF
PARK STORAGE SHED ROOF CLEF
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
26104
CEMETARY- ROOF CLEANING & M
CEMETARY- ROOF CLEANING & M
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
26105
CITY HALL - ROOF & GUTTER CLE/
CITY HALL - ROOF & GUTTER CLE/
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
26106
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - RO(
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE - RO(
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
Tota I :
7.2.a
Page: 19
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a-
(1)
13,458.6E 'D
13,458.6E m
L_
N
590.0(
t
U
61.3E
m
c
d
760.0(
c
�a
79.0� o
�a
a
585.0(
60.8z U
4-
0
�a
960.0( o
L
a
a
99.8z Q
N
1,155.0( c
m
0
120.1, N
E
2
U
595.0(
c
W
61.8E E
5,128.0E U
Q
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
247602
6/3/2021
072746 MURRAYSMITH INC
20-2775.00-14
EOGA SERVICES THRU 4/30/2021
EOGA SERVICES THRU 4/30/2021
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
20-2775.01-1
E21 GA SERVICES THRU 4/30/2021
E21 GA SERVICES THRU 4/30/2021
423.000.75.594.35.41.00
Total
247603
6/3/2021
070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
10355560
MAY GOCOMMUTER FEES
MAY FEES
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
10355561
MAY FSA FEES
MAY FSA FEES
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
Total
247604
6/3/2021
024001 NC MACHINERY
SECS0712282
UNIT 57 - PARTS
UNIT 57 - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
SECS0712357
UNIT 57 - PARTS/ ADAPTER
UNIT 57 - PARTS/ ADAPTER
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total
247605
6/3/2021
024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
0764350-IN
FLEET - FILTERS
FLEET - FILTERS
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
0764351-IN
UNIT 121 - DEF FLUID
7.2.a
Page: 20
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
247605 6/3/2021 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued)
247606 6/3/2021 064655 NEW RESTORATION & RECOVERY SVC INV17483
247607
247608
247609
6/3/2021 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS N032469
6/3/2021 065720 OFFICE DEPOT
6/3/2021 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
171991540001
PO # Description/Account
UNIT 121 - DEF FLUID
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
Total :
WWTP: SAND REMOVAL FROM INC
SAND REMOVAL FROM INCINERAT
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
charge for filing fee for wage adj
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
10.4% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
WWTP: PO #575 HOSE ASSY, EC21
PO #575 HOSE ASSY, EC215-06LR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
9.8% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
INV 171991540001 - ACCT 9052043'
PUBLIC WORKS - DISHWASHER TP
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00
Total
3685-136588 UNIT 51 PARTS/ FUEL CAP
UNIT 51 PARTS/ FUEL CAP
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
3685-136592 UNIT 24 - PARTS/ BELT
7.2.a
Page: 21
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
199.6E u
L
20.7,
243.51
m
v
13, 905.2.
a�
40.0(
�a
1,446.1E o
15,391.4( j,
M
a
E
M
252.8E Z
4-
0
24.7E
277.6E 0
L
Q
a
Q
97.9� N
M
10.1E 9
108.1f
E
M
13.7,
aD
1.4' t
U
�a
Q
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 22
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
247609
6/3/2021
072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
(Continued)
0
UNIT 24 - PARTS/ BELT
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
23.6E u
10.4% Sales Tax
L
511.000.77.548.68.31.10
2.4E
Total:
41.25
m
247610
6/3/2021
077808 OSBORN CONSULTING INC
6142
EOFB SERVICES THRU 4/30/2021
v
EOFB SERVICES THRU 4/30/2021
422.000.72.594.31.41.00
24,343.0E
Total :
24,343.05
247611
6/3/2021
074793 PETDATA INC
9540
INV 9540 - EDMONDS PD
63 1 YEAR PET LICENSES
—
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
264.6(
5 LATE FEES COLLECTED
a
001.000.41.521.70.41.00
12.5(
Total :
277.1( •�
247612
6/3/2021
046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
200002411383
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN
c
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1i
2,166.8, o
200007876143
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
a
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
Q-
Q
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
101.0"
200011439656
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
N
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
Cl)
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
90.2< m
200016558856
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME
N
E
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
801.1E 'M
200016815843
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
419.2( E
200017676343
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7
Q
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 23
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
247612
6/3/2021 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
(Continued)
0
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
as
162.9( -0
200019895354
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN
L
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
47.6"
200020415911
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ;
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ;
001.000.65.518.20.47.00
10.9( U
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
41.4- c
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ;
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
41.4-
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ;
sa
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
41.4- 0
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
41.4- a
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC 7110 210TH ;
E
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
41.3� .i
200024711901
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE
0
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
217.3� >
Total:
4,224.X o
a
247613
6/3/2021 077429 PURE WATER AQUATICS
2280
PM SUPPLIES: AED CABINET
Q"
Q
PM SUPPLIES: AED CABINET
.r
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
295.8E N
10.4% Sales Tax
Cl)
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
30.7 1 c
Total :
326.6! ,n
E
247614
6/3/2021 076328 SCJ ALLIANCE
63557
E20CE SERVICES THRU 5/1/2021
2
E20CE SERVICES THRU 5/1/2021
U
112.000.68.595.33.41.00
67,967.4< r-
E20CE SERVICES THRU 5/1/2021
E
126.000.68.595.33.41.00
393.7� U
�a
Q
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 24
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
247614
6/3/2021
076328 076328 SCJ ALLIANCE
(Continued)
Total :
68,361.2:
247615
6/3/2021
066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
S5-6315157
FLEET - PARTS
FLEET - PARTS
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
306.8(
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40
31.9-
Total :
338.71
247616
6/3/2021
066918 SEDOR, NORMAN
37
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.29.00
5,700.0(
Total:
5,700.0(
247617
6/3/2021
063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
1093-6
PM PAINT SUPPLIES
PM PAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
35.4�
PAINT RECYCLING FEE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
0.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
3.6�
Total :
40.1;
247618
6/3/2021
078372 SHERWOOD PARENT STAFF ORGANIZN
05202021 DC Grant
DIVERSITY COMMISSION GRANT A
DIVERSITY COMMISSION GRANT
001.000.61.557.20.41.00
500.0(
Tota I :
500.0(
247619
6/3/2021
066754 SNO CO PUBLIC WORKS
I000556730
SNO COUNTY ASSISTANCE LOAN (
Sno County Assistance Loan 03-201 E
422.000.72.591.31.78.00
21,513.1 E
Sno County Assistance Loan 03-201 E
422.000.72.592.31.83.20
5,808.5E
Total:
27,321.71
247620
6/3/2021
037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
200202547
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95-
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95-
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
247620 6/3/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued)
200348233
200468593
200493146
200638609
200714038
200865202
201197084
201236825
201327111
201572898
201656907
201751476
PO # Description/Account
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD /
LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M
MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
SEAVIEW PARK
SEAVIEW PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE
LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
SEAVIEW PARK
SEAVIEW PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
FISHING PIER RESTROOMS
FISHING PIER RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
PINE ST PARK
PINE ST PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW
7.2.a
Page: 25
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
16.6( 'D
U
m
40.4<
N
m
248.6z
m
c
16.6(
c
�a
165.0E o
0
�a
a
18.Of
U
45 59.7- 0
�a
0
L
23.6z a
Q
144.6' N
Cl)
0
0
16.6( ,n
E
2
U
38.5E
c
aD
E
108.01
Q
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247620 6/3/2021 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
247621
247622
247623
247624
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
201782646
202421582
202807632
6/3/2021 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Koszarek & Simmons
6/3/2021 075292 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE Release of Liens
6/3/2021 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911
6/3/2021 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
10-IN
103587
PO # Description/Account
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / �
TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / �
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI
LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW
TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
Total
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT COb
accessory dwelling unit covenant for
001.000.25.514.30.49.00
Total
RELEASE OF LIENS FOR FINANCE
release of liens
421.000.74.534.80.49.00
release of liens
423.000.75.535.80.49.00
Total
JUN-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA-
JUN-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA-
001.000.39.528.00.41.50
JUN-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA-
421.000.74.534.80.41.50
JUN-2021 COMMUNICATION DISPA-
423.000.75.535.80.41.50
Total
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE & RECYC
7.2.a
Page: 26
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
47.0z u
16.6(
m
t
U
41.9E
m
c
d
17.9E
1,020.2' sa
0
�a
a
103.5(
103.5(
0
�a
340.0( o
L
a
340.0( Q
680.0( "
N
M
0
70,384.0E
E
1,852.2- 'R
1,852.2-
74,088.5(
t
U
co
Q
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7.2.a
Page: 27
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
247624
6/3/2021
038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
(Continued)
0
PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,162.5E u
104757
WWTP: 5/2021 ROLLOFF ASH DISP
L
5/2021 ROLLOFF ASH DISPOSAL+E
423.000.76.535.80.47.65
5,639.0,
201159
WWTP: 5/2021 DROPBOXES & DUN
a0i
5/2021 DROPBOXES & DUMP FEES
U
423.000.76.535.80.47.65
823.0E
Total:
7,624.7' c
d
247625
6/3/2021
078370 TEAM WENDY LLC
CD970041531
INV CD970041531 - CUST T12726- E
BALLISTIC HELMET - SWAT
�a
001.000.41.521.23.35.00
1,175.6� o
QUICK RELEASE ADAPTER KIT
001.000.41.521.23.35.00
83.9" a
Freight
001.000.41.521.23.35.00
42.0 , '�
Total:
1,301.61,
0
247626
6/3/2021
027269 THE PART WORKS INC
INV66190
PM SUPPLIES: VALVE REPAIR KIT
7a
PM SUPPLIES: VALVE REPAIR KIT
>
0
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
535.4< a
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
55.6E v
INV67623
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES/ URINAL
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES/ URINAL
c
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
402.1' co
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
41.8', E
Total:
1,035.01
247627
6/3/2021
064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE
1129
SPRING SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTF
SPRING SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTF
E
001.000.64.571.25.49.00
2,280.0(
�a
Q
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
247627 6/3/2021 064214 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE (Continued)
247628 6/3/2021 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9880361440
PO # Description/Account
Total
C/A 571242650-0001
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bldg
001.000.62.524.20.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc
001.000.61.557.20.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council
001.000.11.511.60.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs
001.000.62.524.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering
001.000.67.518.21.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance
001.000.31.514.20.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance
001.000.31.514.23.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR
001.000.22.518.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Human Sen
001.000.63.557.20.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Park Admin
001.000.64.571.21.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Maint
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
7.2.a
Page: 28
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
2,280.0( 0
U
d
L_
639.9,
N
36.1.E
U
149.0E
m
c
772.6E
307.0E
0
321.1
�a
a
1,474.6E
227.0E U
0
36.1.E
0
L
36.1.E a
Q
150.8 ,
N
50.2� Cl)
0
413.2E
100.5E
50.2E (D
E
t
321.1 E L)
Q
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 69
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247628 6/3/2021 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Rec
001.000.64.571.22.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
Air cards PD
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning
001.000.62.558.60.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/SeWe
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/Sewe
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
7.2.a
Page: 29
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
140.5E u
L
2,508.4z N
1,160.2E
v
389.1,
m
c
26.6E m
c
7.6, f°
0
L
26.6E
a
7.6, E
7.6( ,-
0
166.4E >
0
L
50.2E a
Q
55.5E N
Cl)
55.5 1 m
0
340.6z
486.5z
c
156.1E
z
265.2 -
Q
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 70
7.2.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 30
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
247628
6/3/2021
067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
(Continued)
0
m
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
265.2( u
iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP
L
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
660.4E
iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Disco
Y
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
40.0-
9880495457
C/A 772540262-00001
v
Cradlepoint 1 - Court/IT
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
100.0- c
Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm
M
421.000.74.534.80.49.20
3.3"
Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm
422.000.72.531.90.49.20
3.3- o
Trimble 2 - Engineering Storm
423.000.75.535.80.49.20
3.4( a
Trimble 1 - Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
10.0,
Lake Ballinger monitor
422.000.72.531.90.49.20
32.3, _0
Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te
fd
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
17 0, so-
Wonderwear Modem Water/Sewer Te
a
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
17.0' Q
Total :
12,089.71 N
247629
6/3/2021
064972 VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER
05122021
POLICE PRE -EMPLOYMENT
o
DUNHAM - PREEMPLOYMENT
C°
0
001.000.22.521.10.41.00
347.0( N
Total :
347.0( .
247630
6/3/2021
075283 WAVE
3201-1027483-01
FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF
U
High Speed Internet service 06/01/21
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
a�
816.0( E
Total:
816.0( U
�a
Q
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 71
7.2.a
vchlist Voucher List Page: 31
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM City of Edmonds
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun N
247631
6/3/2021
075635 WCP SOLUTIONS
12274441
PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES
0
m
PARKS FACILITY MAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
70.8( u
10.4% Sales Tax
L
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
7.3E
12274442
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
1,108.7( v
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
115.3( c
Total :
1,302.1E M
247632
6/3/2021
073552 WELCO SALES LLC
8019
BUSINESS CARDS FOR ENGINEER
business cards for russel lynch for
o
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
57.0(
10.4% Sales Tax
a
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
5.9<
8020
UTILITY BILLING - #10 WINDOW & E
UTILITY BILLING - #10 WINDOW & E
U
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
183.E 0
UTILITY BILLING - #10 WINDOW & E
Ta
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
183.E o
UTILITY BILLING - #10 WINDOW & E
a
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
183.6E Q
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
19.1( N
10.4% Sales Tax
Cl)
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
19.1( c
10.4% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.31.00
19.1( .
Total :
671 Z u
247633
6/3/2021
075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR
8083157
PS - BIMONTHLY SERVICE
PS - BIMONTHLY SERVICE
E
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
103.9E
10.4% Sales Tax
Q
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 72
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
247633 6/3/2021 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR (Continued)
247634 6/3/2021 075743 WHISTLE WORKWEAR OF SHORELINE 203420
247635 6/3/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
203421
203422
253-007-4989
253-012-9166
253-012-9189
253-014-8062
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.41.00
Total :
WWTP: KDUNN RAINBOOTS--SHOI
KDUNN RAINBOOTS--SHORELINE
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
WWTP: KDUNN UNIFORMALLOW.-
KDunn Uniform Allowance Purchase ;
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
WWTP: KDUNN 2021 RAINGEAR
KDUNN RAINBOOTS--SHORELINE
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
Total
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR)
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR)
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
WWTP: 5/25=6/24/21 AUTO DIALER
5/25=6/24/21 AUTO DIALER - 1 VOI
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
7.2.a
Page: 32
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
10.8- -0
114.7E u
m
L_
N
125.9�
t
U
12.8E
m
c
d
140.2 ,
c
�a
14.3- o
�a
a
197.9f
20.1 � U
511.55 0
�a
0
L
a
31.1, Q
N
162.7- c
302.1 N
E
2
41.5E U
c
a�
E
19.8 U
co
Q
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 73
vchlist
06/03/2021 9:38:02AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
247635 6/3/2021 011900 ZIPLY FIBER
82 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
82 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
253-017-4360
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
425-712-8347
CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE
CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
425-771-5553
WWTP: 5/25-6/24/21 AUTO DIALER:
5/25-6/24/21 AUTO DIALER - 1 BUS
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
Tota I :
Bank total
Total vouchers
7.2.a
Page: 33
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
aD
36.9( 'D
U
d
47.0z
N
87.3E
75.0(
a�
132.7E
936.5( p
0
454,843.2( a
454,843.2E .
�a
U
4-
0
�a
0
L
Q
Q
Q
r
N
M
O
O
O
N
E
2
V
a
0
E
t
V
f6
Q
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 74
7.2.b
vchlist
06/02/2021 12 : 47 : 47 P M
Bank code: usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
5282021 5/28/2021 062693 US BANK
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
1 Vouchers in this report
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
0824 US BANK - CC FINAL
WESTERN SUPPLY LANYARDS
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
FISHERIES SUPPLY ROPE AND VIN
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
JACOBSEN'S MARINE 8FT PREMIU
001.000.67.518.21.49.00
Total
Bank total
Total vouchers
Page: 1
m
L
3
c
ea
Amoun 00
a
0
0
138.9, m
=a
143.2- Y
m
51.91
334.0°
m
334.0: a0i
334.0°
�a
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 75
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
4th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FIB
STM
W1 8 Lorian Woos
s01
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
STM W019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
r
STR
2019 Traffic Calmi
i038
E9AA
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
EkWTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
E7JA
STR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
NFSTR
2020 Overlay Program
STR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
STR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STR Guardrail Installations
i057
STR
2021 Overlay Program
i051
q=FJB
E21 CA
STR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
i062
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i060
E21 CC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21 CD
STR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21AA
111LWTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
i059�
F21CjPJM
STR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
ELSTR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
KSTR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
ErSTR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OV
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
�368
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
89th PI W Retaining V
_025
STR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
dmiral WIMIRdestrian Crossing
i040
STR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E91FA
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i050
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
KSTR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhanceme
i026
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
WORK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
EOMA
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 76
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
ayton St. Utility Replacem 3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5JB
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
Irp
Edmonds Fishing Pier Re
c443
E4MB
STR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
E5DB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
STR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E5KA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
a—STR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
E6AA
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
KPWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
E5GB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
IrSTR
Minor Sidewalk Program
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
errinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
52
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
hase Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Proj
c547
EOFB
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21 GA
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21GB il
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E5FD
KSTM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2i
c54
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
ELTR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
E20CE
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
KSTM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
VSTR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
54
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STR lWalnut
St. Walkway (3
�044
DC
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Deslgqmmmpp�
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
& Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026�
EOJB
PRK
rYost
IYost Park Infiltration Facility
c556
E21 FA
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 77
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STR
EOAA
i046 =20
Guardrail Installation
STR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
STR
EOCC
i053
2020 Waterline Overlay
STR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
i049-IM20
Pedestrian Safety Progr
STR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
c546L
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
E0F13
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
548W
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
EOJB
s026 00'ost
& Seaview Reservoir Assessment
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design) Fr
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
E1 CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E1DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR
E20CB
i052
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
STR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
STR
E21AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
2021 Guardrail Installations
STR
E21 CA
i051
2021 Overlay Program
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i060
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
ori061
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Forc
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
E21 FB
c560
W Slope Stabilization
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
SWR
E21 GA
c559
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
SWR
E21 GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
WTR
E21JA
c558
'Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c423W38th
St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM
E41FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SW
Basin & Flow Study
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c443
Edmonds Fishing
STR
ESAA
c470
Trackside Warning System
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 78
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STR
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
E5FD
c479
Weaview Park Infiltration Facility
SWR
E5GB
s011
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
-014A
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
7ABW
i024
dible Pedestrian Signals
STR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining
STR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilizati
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
�M
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
E7MAjM
m10311
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E8CC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i033
STR
E8DC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
8FA
s018 1WO18
Lonan Woods Stu
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Proj
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
UTILITIES
E8JB
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
EL PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
i045IM019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 79
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
PM
EBMA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E1 CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STIR
ESAA
c470
Trackside Warning System
WTR
ESKA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STIR
ESDA
c474
Bikelink Project
STIR
ESDB
c478
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
STM
ESFD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
WWTP
ESHA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
ESJB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
PRK
E7MA
c496
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
FAC
E9MA
c502
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
SWR
EBGA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
EBFB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
WTR
EBJA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
STM
EBFC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
PRK
EOMA
c536
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
PRK
E7MA
c544
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
STM
EOFA
c546
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
STM
EOFB
c547
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
SWR
EOGA
c548
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
EOJA
c549
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
PRK
EOMA
c551
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
STM
E20FC
c552
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
PRK
E21 FA
c556
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
WTR
E21JA
c558
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
SWR
E21 GA
c559
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
STM
E21 FB
c560
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
WTR
E21JB
c561
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
SWR
E21 GB
c562
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STIR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 80
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
STIR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STIR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STIR
EBAB
i028
220th Adaptive
STIR
EBCA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
EBCC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STIR
EBDB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STIR
EBDC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
STIR
E9AA
i038
2019 Traffic Calming
STIR
E9DA
i040
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
STIR
EOCA
i042
2020 Overlay Program
WTR
E9CB
i043
2019 Waterline Overlay
STIR
E9DC
i044
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
STIR
E9AD
i045
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STIR
EOAA
i046
2020 Guardrail Installations
STIR
EOAB
i047
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
STIR
EOAC
i048
2020 Traffic Calming
STIR
EODB
i049
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
STIR
EODC
i050
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
STIR
E21 CA
io51
2021 Overlay Program
STIR
E20CB
i052
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
STIR
EOCC
io53
2020 Waterline Overlay
STIR
E20CE
i055
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
STIR
E21 AA
i056
2021 Traffic Calming
STIR
E21AB
i057
2021 Guardrail Installations
STIR
E21 DA
i058
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
WTR
E21 CB
i059
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
SWR
E21 CC
i060
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
STM
E21 CD
i061
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
STIR
E21 DB
i062
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
STM
E71FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
UTILITIES
ESNA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
ESGB
s0l l
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
STIR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
EBFA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
EBJB
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
STM
E91FA
s022
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
STIR
EODA
s024
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
GF
EONA
s025
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
WTR
EOJB
s026
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
STM
E21 FC
s028
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 81
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South
c502
E9MA
GF
Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update
s025
EONA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Construction)
c551
EOMA
PRK
Civic Center Playfield (Design)
c536
EOMA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction)
c544
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design)
c496
E7MA
PRK
Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design)
m103
E7MA
PRK
Yost Park Infiltration Facility
c556
E21 FA
STM
174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
EBFB
STM
175th St. SW Slope Stabilization
c560
E21 FB
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
EBFA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
EBFC
STM
2021 Stormwater Overlay Program
i061
E21 CD
STM
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
s022
E9FA
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
STM
Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements
c552
E20FC
STM
Perrinville Creek Recovery Study
s028
E21 FC
STM
Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project
c547
EOFB
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
ESFD
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2
c546
EOFA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
STR
2019 Traffic Calming
i038
E9AA
STR
2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i045
E9AD
STR
2020 Guardrail Installations
i046
EOAA
STR
2020 Overlay Program
i042
EOCA
STR
2020 Pedestrian Safety Program
i049
EODB
STR
2020 Pedestrian Task Force
s024
EODA
STR
2020 Traffic Calming
i048
EOAC
STR
2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades
i047
EOAB
STR
2021 Guardrail Installations
i057
E21AB
STR
2021 Overlay Program
i051
E21 CA
STR
2021 Traffic Calming
i056
E21AA
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
EBDC
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
STR
76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD)
i052
E20CB
STR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
EBCA
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 82
7.2.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
STR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
EBCC
STR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
STR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
EBDB
STR
Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing
i040
E9DA
STR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
STR
Bikelink Project
c474
ESDA
STR
Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project
i050
EODC
STR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
STR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
STR
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector
c478
ESDB
STR
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave
i058
E21 DA
STR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STR
SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal)
i055
E20CE
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STR
Trackside Warning System
c470
ESAA
STR
Walnut St. Walkway (3rd-4th)
i044
E9DC
STR
2021 Pedestrian Task Force
i061
E21 DB
STR
2020 Waterline Overlay
i053
EOCC
STR
220th Adaptive
i028
EBAB
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
EBGA
SWR
2021 Sewer Overlay Program
i060
E21 CC
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s0l l
ESGB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
SWR
Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c548
EOGA
SWR
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project
c559
E21 GA
SWR
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services
c562
E21GB
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s02O
EBJB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
ESNA
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
EBJA
WTR
2019 Waterline Overlay
i043
E9CB
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
WTR
2021 Waterline Overlay Program
i059
E21 CB
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
ESJB
WTR
Elm St. Waterline Replacement
c561
E21JB
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
ESKA
WTR
Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c549
EOJA
WTR
Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project
c558
E21JA
WTR
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment
s026
EOJB
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
ESHA
Revised 6/2/2021 Packet Pg. 83
7.2.d
Hour Type
.w
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,063 (05/28/2021 to 05/28/2021)
Hour Class Description
RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY
Hours Amount
0.00 76,922.76
0.00 $76,922.76
Total Net Pay: $53,758.65
06/03/2021
Packet Pg. 84
7.2.e
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,007 (05/16/2021 to 05/31/2021)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
112
ABSENT
NO PAY NON HIRED
48.00
0.00
119
SICK
Donated Sick Leave -used
78.00
3,709.08
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
464.75
16,864.56
122
VACATION
VACATION
829.75
32,484.40
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
173.00
6,458.86
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
16.00
616.35
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
162.50
6,341.35
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
10.00
608.25
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Dav Used
84.00
3,444.29
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
215.84
11,236.62
157
SICK
SICK LEAVE PAYOFF
149.82
7,407.72
158
VACATION
VACATION PAYOFF
159.16
7,869.52
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
7.00
444.62
170
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL BASE PAY
700.00
9,916.62
174
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY
0.00
300.00
175
REGULAR HOURS
COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICP
0.00
3,714.40
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
16,489.75
683,739.95
191
REGULAR HOURS
FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS
2.00
1,460.45
194
SICK
Emerqencv Sick Leave
173.00
5,791.24
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
75.00
3,833.91
205
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME .5
10.00
203.20
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
132.00
6,506.61
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
42.00
2,470.34
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
12.00
1,305.98
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
223.50
15,980.54
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
21.00
1,476.37
405
ACTING PAY
OUT OF CLASS - POLICE
0.00
514.38
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
349.01
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,154.24
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
164.82
601
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP .5
18.00
0.00
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
60.00
0.00
603
COMP HOURS
Holidav Comp 1.0
9.00
0.00
06/03/2021
Packet Pg. 85
7.2.e
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,007 (05/16/2021 to 05/31/2021)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
306.75
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 2.0
18.25
0.00
901
SICK
ACCRUED SICK LEAVE
78.00
0.00
903
MISCELLANEOUS
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
0.00
-37.50
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
82.04
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
198.23
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC II Certification
0.00
96.39
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstruction ist
0.00
89.56
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
179.12
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
410.04
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
1.00
deftat
MISCELLANEOUS
DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOI
0.00
89.56
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
122.69
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
1,084.60
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
694.41
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
552.86
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
6,482.82
firear
MISCELLANEOUS
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
483.61
fmis
SICK
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
87.00
3,622.66
hol
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY
1,237.10
51,206.05
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
251.53
less
MISCELLANEOUS
LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR
0.00
85.68
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
1,099.07
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
599.74
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 9%
0.00
4,451.51
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 7%
0.00
1,050.71
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 5%
0.00
1,298.43
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
251.44
I0
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
299.33
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3%
0.00
1,256.34
Ici6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
378.19
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
307.02
Iq8
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 8%
0.00
710.88
06/03/2021
Packet Pg. 86
7.2.e
Hour Type Hour Class
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
ooc
MISCELLANEOUS
nds
MISCELLANEOUS
pfmp
ABSENT
pfms
SICK
phy
MISCELLANEOUS
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
pto
MISCELLANEOUS
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
sgt
MISCELLANEOUS
st
REGULAR HOURS
str
MISCELLANEOUS
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,007 (05/16/2021 to 05/31/2021)
Description Hours Amount
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
122.69
OUT OF CLASS
0.00
507.30
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
116.54
Paid Family Medical Unpaid/Sup
121.00
0.00
Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
55.00
2,136.99
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,530.23
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
0.00
194.64
Training Officer
0.00
155.72
SPECIAL DUTY PAY
0.00
301.49
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
194.64
Serqeant Pay
0.00
145.98
STREET CRIMES
0.00
521.80
TRAFFIC
0.00
122.69
22,268.17 $920,816.40
Total Net Pay: $622,919.59
06/03/2021
Packet Pg. 87
7.2.f
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,007 - 05/16/2021 to 05/31/2021
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
64700
06/04/2021
bpas
BPAS
4,955.44
0.00
64701
06/04/2021
jhan
JOHN HANCOCK
408.56
0.00
64702
06/04/2021
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
3,449.87
0.00
64703
06/04/2021
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
3,918.39
0.00
64704
06/04/2021
afscme
WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO
2,334.22
0.00
15,066.48 0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
3210
06/04/2021
pens
DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
352,714.92
0.00
3212
06/04/2021
aflac
AFLAC
5,208.22
0.00
3215
06/04/2021
us
US BANK
125,165.83
0.00
3216
06/04/2021
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N3177131
119,652.77
0.00
3217
06/04/2021
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
25,884.62
0.00
3219
06/04/2021
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
5,486.19
0.00
3220
06/04/2021
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
764.50
0.00
0.00
634,877.05
Grand Totals:
649,943.53
0.00
6/3/2021
Packet Pg. 88
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/8/2021
Public Hearing regarding Master Permit authorizing Placement of Small Wireless (Small Cell) Facilities in
the City's Rights -of -Way
Staff Lead: City Attorney, Public Works, Planning
Department: City Attorney's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
The Council has considered this Master Permit at the May 18, 2021, and May 25, 2021, Council
meetings.
In March 2019, the Council passed Resolution 1426 arising from concerns over radio frequency
emissions and the FCC 2018 order limiting fees cities can impose on wireless providers using the rights
of way and limiting municipal authority to regulate aesthetics, directing the Mayor's Office to distribute
it to members of the FCC, the FDA Commissioner, and our Congressional Delegation.
In April 2019, the Council passed amendments to chapter 20.50 ECDC, Wireless Communication
Facilities addressing site specific requirements for locating small wireless facilities. Chapter 20.50
requires a Master Permit as a condition of receiving a wireless facilities permit and a right of way
construction permit, and all three are required in order to place wireless facilities in the City's rights -of -
way. (Staff may, as a matter of administrative convenience, combine the latter two into one permit.)
Staff Recommendation
That the City Council be advised about the Master Permit and pass an ordinance containing the draft
language recommended by city staff and the City Attorney's Office.
Narrative
New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC, aka AT&T ("New Cingular"), has asked the City for permission to place
its small wireless facilities in the City's rights -of -way. Before it may do so, New Cingular needs to obtain
a Master Permit which is a general authorization to place its small wireless facilities in the rights -of -way,
and it also needs to obtain site specific permits for each particular deployment it wants to make. The
Master Permit must be granted by the City Council. The City Attorney's Office in consultation with city
staff has been negotiating the terms of a Master Permit for a little over a year, and the parties now have
agreed language to present to Council.
The following legal framework surrounding cities' authority to regulate telecommunications service
providers may be helpful for City Council to have in mind when considering this matter:
RCW 35A.47.040: The state statute generally authorizing code cities to grant nonexclusive franchises for
use of the rights -of -way for various utilities, including communications, and requires passage by the city
council by approving vote of at least a majority of the entire council.
RCW 35.99: The state statute applicable to telecommunications, establishing a system whereby cities
Packet Pg. 89
8.1
may grant "master permits" (also known as franchises) for use of the city's rights -of way for placement
of facilities for telecommunications service.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996: The federal law that addresses state and local governments'
ability to regulate telecommunications including wireless telecommunications. 47 U.S.C. 253 (a) and 47
U.S.C. 332(c)(7) reflect Congressional intent to expand deployment of wireless services and authorize
the FCC to preempt any state and local requirements that "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting"
any entity from providing telecommunications services.
FCC orders: Orders promulgated under the authority of Congressional statute and governing the
installation and management of small wireless facilities, including the manner in which local
governments can regulate them, often spelling out limits on local governments' authority to regulate
telecommunications providers.
The following are some questions and answers that might be of interest to the City Council:
What is Council being asked to do? Council is being asked to approve an ordinance authorizing the
Mayor to execute a Master Permit containing the language recommended by city staff and the City
Attorney's Office, attached. The parties are presenting agreed language.
What is a Master Permit? A Master Permit is a franchise for telecommunications providers issued under
the authority of RCW 35.99 which is a general authority for a telecommunications provider to place its
facilities in the City's rights -of -way in order to provide telecommunications services.
What are some of the main items covered in this Master Permit?
It gives a general permission to place small wireless facilities and associated equipment located
within ten feet of a support structure in the City's rights -of -way, subject to other required
permits and the terms of the Master Permit.
It specifies that prior to placement the provider needs a wireless facilities permit and a right-of-
way construction permit, considered in accordance with the procedures of chapter 20.50 ECDC.
It has a five-year term, subject to renewal by the city council, and requires any defaults be cured
before any renewal will be granted.
Other providers may obtain master permits or franchises as well.
City can require relocation of the facilities at New Cingular's expense in accordance with RCW
35.99, e.g., to accommodate a public improvement project, and sets agreed procedures.
New Cingular shall reimburse the City for its actual administrative costs incurred. No franchise
fee is charged as dictated by RCW 35.21.860.
New Cingular will indemnify the city, maintain specified insurance, and assume risk of damage
to its facilities.
New Cingular will maintain an inventory of its facilities with a copy to the City and provide
updates.
New Cingular agrees to comply with all applicable laws, standards, and regulations relating to its
facilities and at all times will maintain them in a safe condition in good order and repair.
Procedures are specified in the event of a breach, including notice and an opportunity to
respond and request public hearing before Council. In addition to termination, the City may
impose lesser sanctions, including, but not limited to, monetary penalties, for violation of this
Master Permit.
New Cingular will establish a permanent security fund in the amount of $50,000 to guarantee
Packet Pg. 90
8.1
the performance of its requirements under the Master Permit and payment of sums due the
City.
Certain provisions survive expiration or termination of the Master Permit for the protection of
the City, e.g., the indemnity and insurance provisions.
Does Council have discretion to grant a Master Permit? The Telecommunications Act of 1996 states
that no local government may prohibit or effectively prohibit the provision of telecommunications
service. Congress expressly preempted state and local governments from enacting laws or ordinances
that conflict with this mandate; however, Congress allowed cities to retain the ability to manage the
rights -of -way. We can negotiate terms of our agreement but cannot prohibit the provider from
providing their telecommunications service.
Is New Cingular the first provider seeking permits to install small wireless facilities within the City of
Edmonds rights -of -way? Yes.
Is New Cingular providing SG? The Master Permit authorizes the provision of telecommunications
services and does not specify any particular generation of wireless service or broadband technology. The
Council may inquire of New Cingular what types of service technology it plans to utilize.
Does New Cingular need PUD's approval before locating its equipment on PUD's poles? Yes. That
approval is required in ECDC 20.50.070(G).
Can Council see images of what is planned to be installed in the City's rights -of -way? Aesthetic review
occurs as part of the site -specific review, which is an administrative process as provided in chapter 20.50
ECDC. There is no aesthetic review as part of the master permit process. ECDC 20.50.070 (D) requires
any applicant for a wireless facilities permit to submit photos and photo simulations showing the
existing appearance of each site and the appearance of the proposed installation from nearby public
viewpoints.
I've heard there are "shot clocks." What are they and do they apply here? The FCC has created time
limits, called shot clocks, for cities to process applications to locate small wireless facilities. The shot
clock starts to run when a provider submits a small wireless facilities application. Shot clocks apply to all
local government authorizations required of the applicant.
What did Resolution 1496 do and what has happened at the federal level since?
Resolution 1496 was passed in March 2019:
1. It asked the FCC to perform and update studies on the potential health risks of 5G radio frequency
emissions and publish such findings.
*What happened since? In December 2019, the FCC adopted a new order examining RF exposure in the
5G environment and concluded that no changes to its 1996 standards were warranted.
2. It asked Congress to determine the FCC has overstepped its bounds in its 2018 order titled
"Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" and
asked Congress to adopt a bill entitled "Accelerating Broadband Deployment by Empowering Local
Communities Act of 2019."
*What happened since? According to govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr530, the sponsor was Rep. Anna
Eshoo, the bill was introduced to Congress on Jan 14, 2019, and it did not receive a vote.
Is the federal government regulating RF emissions? Yes. The FCC is obligated to evaluate the potential
Packet Pg. 91
8.1
impacts of human exposure to radiofrequency emissions under the National Environmental Policy Act.
Over the years the FCC has adopted radiofrequency standards which limit the amount of radiation that
can be emitted from wireless transmitters and has created a framework to ensure compliance with
those limits. In December 2019 the FCC issued an order finding its existing RF exposure limits should
remain unchanged.
Have the courts upheld recent FCC orders? Yes. The FCC has promulgated orders relating to the
installation and management of small cell facilities. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has recently
upheld several orders issued in 2018, holding that, "We conclude that, given the deference owed to the
agency in interpreting and enforcing this important legislation, the [orders] are, with the exception of
one provision, in accord with the congressional directive in the Act, and not otherwise arbitrary,
capricious, or contrary to law." City of Portland v. United States, 969 F.3d 1020, 1032 (2020).
What if Council wants to impose conditions on the placement of the wireless facilities based on RF
emissions? The United States Congress has the authority to preempt state and local regulation in the
area of telecommunications, including wireless telecommunications. This is authority granted to
Congress under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. Congress has enacted
legislation -The Telecommunications Act of 1996- as well as earlier legislation, asserting federal control
of telecommunications. In regards to radio frequency, or RF, Congress has granted authority to establish
RF emissions standards only to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and preempted all
municipal regulation of radiofrequency emission to the extent that such facilities comply with federal
emissions standards. Therefore, local officials' hands are largely tied in this area.
What if there are violations of any health and safety requirements? We do not expect violations from
the provider. These requirements are specified to make clear the parties' intentions surrounding New
Cingular's compliance with all applicable regulations relating to health and safety. However, if there is a
violation, the following language applies: "If a violation of the National Electrical Safety Code or other
applicable regulation is found to exist by the City, the City will, after discussions with Permittee,
establish a reasonable time for Permittee to make necessary repairs. If the repairs are not made within
the established time frame, the City may make the repairs itself or have them made and collect all
reasonable costs thereof from Permittee." However, with regard to any RF violation, the provider is
required to shut off the device within 48 hours of being notified. If there are repeated violations, the
City can invoke the forfeiture and revocation procedures of Section 25, which provides that in addition
to termination, the City may impose lesser sanctions, including, but not limited to, monetary penalties,
for violation of this Master Permit.
What can I do if 1 still have concerns about RF emissions? In 2000 the FCC published a guide called, "A
Local Government Official's Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety: Rules, Procedures, and
Practical Guidance." If there are concerns about compliance with FCC standards, the guide suggests
interested persons should contact the provider because the provider is required to understand the FCC's
rules and to know how to apply them in specific cases at specific sites. If that does not resolve any issue,
then interested persons should contact the FCC. The 2000 publication provides the following contact
information:
Compliance and Information Bureau (888) CALL -FCC
Concerns about RF emissions exposure at a particular site: Office of Engineering and Technology, RF
Safety Program, phone (202) 418-2464; rfsafety@fcc.gov <mailto:rfsafety@fcc.gov>
Packet Pg. 92
8.1
Licensing and Site Information Regarding Wireless Telecommunications Services, Wireless
Communications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division (202) 418-0620
You can also contact your federal elected officials.
Attachments:
ATT Master Permit 06.08.2021 Public Hearing
210520 City of Edmonds Draft Master Permit
Resolution 1426
Packet Pg. 93
8.1.a
0120101010`.1\wAKWq0
JUNE 8, 2021 -PUBLIC HEARING
Packet Pg. 94
8.1.a
Master Permit
► Issued under authority of RCW 35.99
► Provides general authority to all site -specific locations
► Currently under review by City Council - Scheduled for Action June 15th
Site Specific Permits (Wireless Facility and/or Right -of -Way Permit)
Regulated by ECDC 20.50 -previously approved by Council April 2019
► Location preference and site specific design requirements
► Administrative Staff Approval
L
d
t+
CR
C
0
�L
:.i
3
d
�L
N
O
N
O
O
O
r
E
L
d
L
d
N
CCU
G
a
Q
Packet Pg. 95
8.1.a
► FCC Orders Withstand Recent Challenge in the Ninth Circuit
► Competing objectives: protecting the public health and safety while
ensuring the rapid development of a telecom network
► Local governments can manage ROW (examples below):
• Coordination of construction schedules
• Determination of insurance, bonding, and indemnity requirements
• Regulate time or location of excavation, preserving traffic flow
• Keeping track of the various systems using the ROW
Packet Pg. 96
8.1.a
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that NO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT MAY PROHIBIT OR EFFECTIVELY PROHIBIT the provision
of telecommunications service.
CONGRESS EXPRESSLY PREEMPTED STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS from enacting laws or ordinances that conflict with
this mandate.
Packet Pg. 97
8.1.a
Orders promulgated under the authority of congressional
statute and governing the installation and management
of small wireless facilities, including the manner in which
local governments can regulate, SPELLING OUT LIMITS ON
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS' AUTHORITY TO REGULATE
telecommunications providers.
Packet Pg. 98
8.1.a
Examples of Effective Prohibition come from case law &the FCC
Includes materially inhibiting a provider's ability to:
► Densify a network
► Introduce new services
► Improve service capabilities
► Taking too long to process permit applications
► Charging more than the FCC will allow
Packet Pg. 99
8.1.a
► Permits cannot be denied based on radio frequency emissions
► The federal government., NOT THE CITY, has authority to
regulate RF Emissions
► Resolution 1426 (March 2019) - a resolution by City Council
regarding RF Emissions with distribution to FCC, the FDA
Commissioner, and our Congressional Delegation
Packet Pg. 100
8.1.a
► FCC asked to perform and update studies on the potential health risks of 5G radio
emissions and publish such findings.
r Result: December 2019: The FCC adopted a new order examining RF exposure in the
environment and concluded that no changes to its 1996 standards were warranted
► Congress asked to determine FCC overstepped it's bounds in 2018 order titled
"Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment" and asked Congress to adopt a bill entitled
"Accelerating Broadband Deployment by Empowering Local Communities Act of
2019.
r Result: According to govtrack. us/congress/bills/ 1 16/hr530, the sponsor was Rep Anna
Eshoo, the bill was introduced to Congress on 1 / 14/2019 and did not receive a vote.
Packet Pg. 101
8.1.a
► General permission given to place small wireless facilities and associated
equipment in the City's rights -of -way
► Requires site specific permit in accordance with Chapter 20.50 ECDC.
► Five-year term, subject to renewal by the city council
► Other providers may obtain master permits or franchises as well.
► City can require relocation of the facilities at New Cingular's expense
► New Cingular shall reimburse the City for its actual administrative costs
incurred. No franchise fee is charged as dictated by RCW 35.21.860.
► New Cingular will indemnify the city, maintain specified insurance,
and assume risk of damage to its facilities.
Packet Pg. 102
8.1.a
► Inventory of facilities to be maintained with a copy to the City and
provide updates.
► New Cingular agrees to comply with all applicable laws, standards, and
regulations relating to its facilities and at all times will maintain them in a
safe condition in good order and repair.
► Procedures are specified in the event of a breach
► New Cingular will establish a permanent security fund in the amount of
$50,.000 to guarantee the performance of its requirements under the
Master Permit and payment of sums due the City.
► Certain provisions survive expiration or termination of the Master Permit for
the protection of the City, e.g., the indemnity and insurance provisions. Packet Pg. 103
8.1.a
Master Permit Currently under review by City Council - Scheduled for
Action June 15th
► Chapter 20.50 ECDC regulates small wireless facilities
► City Council passed amendments to Chapter 20.50 ECDC in April 2019
► Chapter 20.50 requires a Master Permit as a condition in addition to the
other permits
Packet Pg. 104
8.1.a
THANK YOU
C
�L
c.i
a.
�L
:.i
a
r
N
O
N
O
O
t0
O
a+
E
L
w
a.
L
N
C�
CD
G
a
E
m
2
a
8.1.b
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, GRANTING TO
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
A NON-EXCLUSIVE MASTER PERMIT AGREEMENT TO INSTALL, OPERATE, AND
MAINTAIN SMALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PRESCRIBING
CERTAIN RIGHTS, DUTIES, TERMS, AND CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO,
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company
whose sole member is AT&T Mobility II LLC and whose sole manager is AT&T Mobility
Corporation, with its principal offices at: 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, P Floor, Atlanta, GA 30319;
and
WHEREAS, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, has an existing Master Use Agreement
with the City of Edmonds effective February 25, 2005 and with a maximum term of twenty years;
and
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, the City Council passed ordinance 4147, amending Chapter
20.50 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Wireless Communications
Facilities," updating standards and process requirements of wireless communications facilities,
including new standards relating to location preference hierarchy and design standards for small
wireless facilities in the right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, since Chapter 20.50 was amended New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, has
requested that the City grant it the right to enter, use, and occupy the city right-of-way in order to
install, operate, and maintain its planned small wireless facilities deployments: a wireless network
consisting of a collection of interrelated small wireless facilities designed to deliver
telecommunications services, and
WHEREAS, due to the Chapter 20.50 amendments, the City requires a new Master Permit
relating to New Cingular's new, and any existing, small wireless facilities; however, the existing
Master Use Agreement shall continue to govern and control with respect to New Cingular Wireless
PCS, LLC's macro facilities and associated equipment installed in the City's right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority under RCW 35A.47.040, RCW 35.99.020
and Chapter 20.50 of the Edmonds Community Development Code to grant, issue, or deny Master
Permit Agreements for the use of city right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant the rights requested subject to certain terms and
conditions.
Packet Pg. 106
8.1.b
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definition. For the purposes of this Master Permit Agreement, the following
terms, phrases, words, and abbreviations shall have the meanings ascribed to them below. When
not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future tense, words
in the plural number include the singular number, and words in the singular number include the
plural number.
a. "Affiliate" means an entity which owns or controls, is owned or controlled
by, or is under common ownership with the Permittee.
b. "City" means the City of Edmonds, Washington.
C. "Facility" or "Facilities" means Permittee's owned, operated, or controlled
Small Wireless Facilities as defined in the Edmonds Community and Development Code
(ECDC) 20.50, incorporated herewith. Facilities further includes any Permittee owned or
controlled Small Wireless Facility support structures, e.g. poles, and any conduit, wires,
coaxial cables, fiber, and other equipment necessary to operate the Small Wireless Facility
that is within ten (10) feet of any support structure --whether Permittee owned or not --to
which the Small Wireless Facility is attached. Facilities do not include any equipment that
is not within ten (10) feet of any support structure to which the Small Wireless Facility is
attached (excluding any strand -mounted unit). Facilities do not include anything used to
provide wireline services, fronthaul or backhaul services. Facilities do not include anything
that is not within the Right -of -Way, or that is covered under a separate master permit or
franchise.
d. "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission, or any successor
governmental entity thereto.
e. "Master Permit Agreement" or "Master Permit" shall mean this agreement,
or renewal thereof, granted by the City pursuant to ECDC 20.50.020(C), through this
Ordinance, or a subsequently adopted Ordinance.
f. "Permittee" means New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, or the lawful successor, transferee, or assignee thereof.
g. "Person" is to be interpreted in its broadest sense and includes individuals,
corporations, companies, associations, joint stock companies or associations, firms,
partnerships, limited liability companies, and any other entity or organization.
h. "Public Ways" or "Rights -of -Way" means land acquired or dedicated for
public roads and streets in the Service Area, but does not include:
OA
Packet Pg. 107
8.1.b
(a) State highways;
(b) Land dedicated for roads, streets, and highways not opened and not
improved for motor vehicle use by the public;
(c) Structures, including poles and conduits, located within the right-of-
way;
(d) Federally granted trust lands or forest board trust lands;
(e) Lands owned or managed by the state parks and recreation
commission; or
(f) Federally granted railroad rights -of -way acquired under 43 U.S.C. Sec.
912 and related provisions of federal law that are not open for motor
vehicle use;
(g) buildings or other City -owned physical facilities; and
(h) parks, poles, conduits, fixtures, real property or property rights owned
by the City, or similar facilities or property owned by or leased to the City
i. "Reasonable" or "reasonably" means an action or decision for which a
reason or basis can be stated, such reason or basis arising from the facts and circumstances
of the particular situation presented. Reasonable or reasonably is contrasted with arbitrary,
i.e., unreasoning action, without consideration and in disregard of facts and circumstances.
Where there is room for two opinions, a decision is reasonable even though one may
believe an erroneous conclusion has been reached.
j. "Service Area" means the present municipal boundaries of the City, and
shall include any additions thereto by annexation or other legal means.
k. "Telecommunications Service" means the transmission of information by
wire, radio, optical cable, electromagnetic, or other similar means for hire, sale, or resale
to the general public. "Information" means knowledge or intelligence represented by any
form of writing, signs, signals, pictures, sounds, or any other symbols.
Telecommunications Service shall not include the over -the -air transmission of broadcast
television or broadcast radio signals, nor the provision of Cable Services as defined in 47
U.S.C. Section 522(6), for which a separate permit and franchise would be required.
Section 2. Terms, Conditions, and Provisions of ECDC Chapters 20.50 and 18.60
Incorporated by Reference. The terms, conditions, and provisions of Chapters 20.50, and 18.60 of
the Edmonds Community and Development Code (ECDC), existing at the time of execution of
this Master Permit or as may thereafter be amended, are incorporated herein by reference. All
rights granted hereunder are subject to the terms, conditions, and requirements of Chapters 20.50
and 18.60 ECDC.
Section 3. Authority Granted. The City hereby grants to the Permittee, its heirs, successors,
legal representatives, and assigns, subject to the requirements of Chapters 20.50 and 18.60 ECDC
and the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the right, privilege, and authority to construct,
operate, maintain, and replace Permittee's Facilities in the Public Ways for the purpose of
providing Telecommunications Service. The City may require a license agreement prior to
Packet Pg. 108
8.1.b
placement or replacement of any support structures in the Public Ways or any attachment to City
owned poles. No substantive expansions, additions to or modifications or relocation of any of the
Facilities shall be permitted without first having received prior authorization from the City.
Section 4. Authority Limited to Occupation of Public Ways. The authority granted herein
is a limited authorization to occupy and use the Public Ways of the City. No authority is granted
to occupy or use any City owned or leased properties. Nothing contained herein shall be construed
to grant or convey any right, title, or interest in the Public Ways of the City to the Permittee, nor
shall anything contained herein constitute a warranty of title.
Section 5. Wireless Communication Facility Permits and Right -of -Way Construction
Permits Required.
A. Prior to site -specific location and installation of any portion of its Facilities within
a Public Way, the Permittee shall apply for and obtain both a wireless communication facility
permit pursuant to ECDC 20.50. and a Right -of -Way construction permit pursuant to ECDC
20.50.020(D) and ECDC Chapter 18.60. The Public Works Director or designee shall review
wireless communication facility permit applications according to the procedure set forth in ECDC
20.50. In addition to any criteria set forth in ECDC Chapter18.60, the Public Works Director or
designee shall apply the following criteria in the issuance or denial of a Right -of -Way construction
permit application:
1. Whether the Permittee has received all requisite licenses, certificates, and
authorizations from applicable federal, state, and local agencies with
jurisdiction over the activities proposed by the Permittee;
2. Whether there is sufficient capacity in the Public Ways to accommodate the
Permittee's proposed Facilities;
3. The capacity of the Public Ways to accommodate additional utility, cable,
and facilities if the construction permit is granted;
4. The damage or disruption, if any, of public or private facilities, utilities,
improvements, service, travel or landscaping if the construction permit is
granted;
5. The public interest in minimizing the cost and disruption of construction
within the Public Ways.; and
6. If any criteria lead the Public Works Director to deny Permittee a
construction permit, then City will consider any alternate routes and/or
locations that may be proposed by Permittee.
B. Unless otherwise provided in said Right -of -Way construction permit and except
for emergency repairs, the Permittee shall give the City at least forty-eight (48) hours' notice of
M
Packet Pg. 109
8.1.b
the Permittee's intent to commence work in the Public Ways. The Permittee shall file plans or
maps with the City showing the proposed location of its Facilities and pay all duly established
Right -of -Way construction permit and inspection fees associated with the processing of said
permit. Except as otherwise provided in this Master Permit Agreement, no work shall commence
within any Public Way without said Right -of -Way construction permit.
C. The City may adopt procedures combining the application and resulting permit for
wireless communication facility and Right -of -Way construction permits.
Section 6. Term of Master Permit; Standards for Renewal.
A. Term. The term of this Master Permit shall be for a period of five (5) years from
the date of acceptance as set forth in Section 39 (Acceptance), unless sooner terminated as provided
herein.
B. Renewal of Master Permit --Procedure. If Permittee desires to renew its Master
Permit for an additional term it shall, not less than 180 days before expiration of the current
Master Permit, file an application with the City for renewal which shall include the following:
1. The information required pursuant to ECDC 20.50.020(C)
2. Any proposed changes to the current Master Permit submitted electronically in
Word format, proposed changes in track changes. Either party may propose
changes;
3. Any information required pursuant to the current Master Permit;
4. Such other information as the Public Works Director, in his/her discretion, shall
deem appropriate; and
5. An application fee for recovery of City staff costs which may be set by the City
Council by resolution, and an additional amount for recovery of costs for
attorneys, consultants, and City Attorney's Office review.
C. Renewal of Master Permit -Standards. The city council shall decide whether to renew,
renew with conditions, require a new master permit, or deny the application, all in accordance
with the terms and procedures of ECDC 20.50.020(C).
D. Renewal of Master Permit -Obligation to Cure. No Master Permit shall be renewed
until any ongoing violations or defaults in the Permittee's performance under the Master Permit,
the requirements of Chapter 20.50 ECDC, the Edmonds Code, as applicable, and any other
lawful applicable regulations with respect to use and management of the Public Ways, other
ways, and City property, have been cured, or a plan detailing the corrective action to be taken by
the Permittee has been approved by the City.
5
Packet Pg. 110
8.1.b
Section 7. Non -Exclusive Grant. This Master Permit shall not in any manner prevent the
City from entering into other similar agreements or granting other or further Master Permit
Agreements, franchises, Right -of -Way permits in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below
any of said Public Ways of the City, nor from exercising such other powers and authorities granted
to the City by law. Permittee shall construct, install, maintain, and continuously operate its
Facilities to prevent interference with the other facilities in the Public Ways and the operation
thereof. Further, this Master Permit shall in no way prevent or prohibit the City from using any of
its Public Ways as authorized by law or not prohibited by law or affect its jurisdiction over them
or any part of them, and the City shall retain power to make all necessary changes, relocations,
repairs, maintenance, establishment, improvement, dedication of the same as the City may deem
fit, including the dedication, establishment, maintenance, and improvement of all new Public
Ways, all in compliance with this Master Permit and applicable law.
Section 8. Relocation of Facilities.
A. Where relocation of Facilities is required by the City, City and Permittee shall comply
with RCW § 35.99.060(2). If RCW 35.99.060(2) is amended after the date of this Master Permit,
then the parties' obligations are likewise amended.
B. Permittee acknowledges that its Facilities may need to be relocated during the term of
this Master Permit Agreement. Permittee agrees and covenants, at its sole cost and expense, to
protect, support, temporarily disconnect, relocate, or remove from any Public Way any portion of
its Facilities when so required by the Public Works Director by reason of traffic conditions, public
safety, dedications of new Public Ways and the establishment and improvement thereof, widening
and improvement of existing Public Ways, street vacations, highway construction, change or
establishment of street grade, or the construction of any public improvement or structure by any
governmental agency acting in a governmental capacity; provided that the Permittee shall in all
cases have the privilege to temporarily relocate, in the authorized portion of the same or similar
public way upon approval by the Public Works Director, any Facility required to be temporarily
disconnected or removed.
C. Upon the reasonable request of, and with at least thirty (30) days' notice from, the Public
Works Director and in order to facilitate the design of City street and right-of-way improvements,
the Permittee agrees to, at its sole cost and expense, locate, and if reasonably determined necessary
by the City, to excavate and expose portions of its Facilities for inspection so that the location of
same may be taken into account in the improvement design, PROVIDED that Permittee shall not
be required to excavate and expose its Facilities unless the Permittee's as -built plans and maps of
its Facilities submitted pursuant to Section 19 (Inventory) of this Master Permit are reasonably
determined by the Public Works Director to be inadequate for purposes of this paragraph. The
decision to require relocation of said Facilities in order to accommodate the City's improvements
shall be made by the Public Works Director upon review of the location and construction of the
Permittee's Facilities.
D. If the Public Works Director determines that the project necessitates the relocation of
the Permittee's then existing Facilities, the City shall:
Con
Packet Pg. 111
8.1.b
1. Within a reasonable time, which shall be no less than sixty (60) days, prior to
the commencement of such improvement project, provide the Permittee with
written notice requiring such relocation. Provided, however, that in the event an
emergency posing a threat to public safety, health or welfare, or in the event of an
emergency beyond the control of the City and which will result in severe financial
consequences to the City, the City shall give the Permittee written notice as soon
as practicable; and
2. Provide the Permittee with copies of information for such improvement
project and a proposed location for the Permittee's Facilities so that the Permittee
may relocate its Facilities in other Public Ways in order to accommodate such
improvement project. City will strive to afford a location from which Permittee can
provide substantially similar service to that provided from the original location
whenever practicable.
3. The Permittee shall complete relocation of its Facilities at no charge or
expense to the City so as to accommodate the improvement project at least 10 days
prior to commencement of the project. In the event of an emergency as described
herein, the Permittee shall relocate is Facilities within the time period specified by
the Public Works Director.
E. The Permittee may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its Facilities,
submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City shall evaluate such alternatives
and advise the Permittee in writing if one or more of the alternatives are suitable to accommodate
the work, which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the Facilities. If so requested by the
City, the Permittee shall submit additional information to assist the City in making such
evaluation. The City shall give each alternative proposed by the Permittee full and fair
consideration, within a reasonable time, so as to allow for the relocation work to be performed in
a timely manner. In the event the City ultimately determines that there is no other reasonable
alternative, the Permittee shall relocate its Facilities as otherwise provided in this Section.
F. The provisions of this Section shall in no manner preclude or restrict the Permittee from
making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for relocation of
its Facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the facilities to be constructed by
said person or entity are not or will not become City -owned, operated or maintained facilities;
provided, that such arrangements do not unduly delay a City construction project.
G. Permittee acknowledges and agrees that the placement of its Facilities on third party -
owned poles does not convey an ownership interest in such poles. Permittee acknowledges and
agrees that to the extent Permittee's Facilities are on poles owned by third parties, the City shall
not be responsible for any costs associated with requests arising out of a relocation. A relocation
includes movement of Facilities arising out of pole removal, replacement or upgrade. Permittee is
not permitted to purchase any utility owned pole in order to avoid relocation or costs associated
with relocation unless specifically authorized by the City.
7
Packet Pg. 112
8.1.b
H. The Permittee will indemnify, hold harmless, and pay the costs of defending the City
against any and all claims, suits, actions, damages, or liabilities for delays on City construction
projects caused by or arising out of the failure of the Permittee to relocate its Facilities in a timely
manner; provided, that the Permittee shall not be responsible for damages due to delays caused by
the City or circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee.
I. The cost and expenses associated with relocation of the Permittee's Facilities shall be the
responsibility of the Permittee unless the Permittee had paid for the relocation cost of the same
Facilities at the request of the City within the past five years. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Ordinance, in the event of a conflict between this Ordinance and the provisions of applicable
state law, the provisions of the applicable state law shall control.
J. In the event of an unforeseen emergency that creates a threat to the public safety, health,
or welfare, the City may require the Permittee to relocate its Facilities at its own expense, any other
portion of this Section notwithstanding.
Section 9. Undergrounding of Facilities.
The parties agree that this Master Permit does not limit the City's authority under federal
law, state law, or local ordinance to require the undergrounding of utilities, including Permittee's
Facilities.
Permittee's Facilities shall be undergrounded; Provided that undergrounding requirements
shall not apply to those elements of Permittee's Facilities that are required to remain above ground
in order to be functional. The City shall not pay any of the cost of undergrounding. Upon an
undergrounding project, Small Wireless Facilities and associated Facilities may be required to
relocate to an alternative approved structure or pole consistent with ECDC 20.50.130 and pursuant
to the relocation requirements of this Master Permit (for example, if all utility poles in the area are
removed as part of the undergrounding project.)
Section 10. Work in Public Ways.
A. During any period of relocation, construction, or maintenance, all surface
structures, if any, shall be erected, used, and maintained in such places and positions within said
Public Ways and other public properties so as to interfere as little as possible with the free passage
of vehicular and pedestrian traffic and the free use of adjoining property. The Permittee shall at
all times comply with all applicable safety and traffic control regulations during such period of
construction as required by the specifications and codes, and all other applicable local municipal,
state, and federal codes, rules and regulations.
B. During the progress of the work, the Permittee shall not unnecessarily obstruct the
passage or proper use of the Public Ways, and all work by the Permittee in any area covered by
this Master Permit and as described in this Section shall be performed in accordance with City of
Edmonds Public Works Construction Standards and warranted for a period of two (2) years.
N.
Packet Pg. 113
8.1.b
C. The Permittee shall cooperate with the City and all other persons with authority
from the City to occupy and use the Public Ways of the City in coordination of construction
activities and joint trenching projects. By February 1st of each calendar year, the Permittee shall
provide the City with a schedule of its proposed construction activities for that calendar year in,
around, or that may affect the Public Ways of the City. The Permittee shall also meet with the
City and other grantees, franchisees, permittees, and users of the Public Ways of the City annually,
or as determined by the City, to schedule and coordinate construction activities.
D. Consistent with RCW Chapter 35.99, the Permittee may, on an annual basis, file
notice with the City Clerk and the City Engineer of its desire to receive notices related to public
improvement projects within the Public Ways of the City. In the event that the Permittee is mailed
such a notice and fails to coordinate installation or construction of its Facilities with the public
improvement project, the City Engineer may deny the Permittee's construction permit application
for those portions of any of the Permittee's construction projects which seek to disrupt the surface
of any said street for a period of up to five years, as reasonably determined by the City Engineer
for the purpose of protecting the City's investment in said public improvement projects. In the
alternative, the City Engineer may require the Permittee to fully restore the surface and sub -surface
areas of such street to the condition that it was in immediately after completion of the public
improvement project.
Section 11. Restoration after Construction. The Permittee shall, after installation,
construction, relocation, maintenance, removal, or repair of its Facilities within the Public Ways,
restore the surface of said Public Ways and any other City -owned property, including support
structures, that may be disturbed by the work, to at least the same condition the Public Way or
property was in immediately prior to any such installation, construction, relocation, maintenance,
removal, or repair. The Public Works Department shall have final approval of the condition of
such Public Ways and City -owned property after restoration, all in accordance with the Edmonds
Municipal Code and Public Works Construction standards. All survey monuments which are to
be disturbed or displaced by such work shall be referenced and restored, as per WAC 332-120, as
the same now exists or may hereafter be amended, and all pertinent federal, state and local
standards and specifications. The Permittee agrees to promptly complete all restoration work and
to promptly repair any damage caused by such work to the Public Ways or other affected area at
its sole cost and expense according to the time and terms specified in the Right -of -Way
Construction Permit issued by the City all in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
Edmonds Municipal Code, as the same now exists or as it may hereafter be amended or
superseded. All work and restoration by the Permittee pursuant to this Section shall be performed
in accord with City of Edmonds Public Works Construction standards and warranted for a period
of two (2) years.
Section 12. Emergency Work — Permit Waiver. In the event of any emergency in which
any of the Permittee's Facilities located in, above, or under any Public Way break, are damaged,
or if the Permittee's construction area is otherwise in such a condition as to immediately endanger
the property, life, health, or safety of any individual, the Permittee shall immediately take the
proper emergency measures to repair its Facilities, to cure or remedy the dangerous conditions for
X
Packet Pg. 114
8.1.b
the protection of property, life, health, or safety of individuals without first applying for and
obtaining a Right -of -Way construction permit as required by this Master Permit . However, this
shall not relieve the Permittee from the requirement of notifying the City of the emergency work
and obtaining any permits necessary for this purpose as promptly as reasonably possible after the
emergency work. The Permittee shall notify the City by telephone immediately upon learning of
the emergency and shall apply for all required permits not later than the second succeeding day
during which the Edmonds City Hall is open for business.
Section 13. Dangerous Conditions, Authority for City to Abate. In the event of any
emergency in which any of Permittee's Facilities breaks, falls, becomes damaged, or if Permittee's
Facilities is otherwise in such a condition as to immediately endanger the property, life, health or
safety of any person, entity or the City, or whenever construction, installation, or excavation of the
Facilities authorized by this Master Permit has caused or contributed to a condition that appears to
substantially impair the lateral support of the adjoining Public Way, street, or public place, or
endangers the public, street utilities, or City -owned property, the City Engineer may require the
Permittee, at the Permittee's own expense, to take action to protect the public, adjacent public
places, City -owned property, streets, utilities, and Public Ways. Such action may include
compliance within a reasonably prescribed time. What will be considered reasonable time will be
determined by the City based on the nature of the dangerous condition.
In the event that the Permittee fails or refuses to promptly take the actions directed by the
City, or fails to fully comply with such directions, or if emergency conditions exist which require
immediate action, the City may enter upon the property and take such actions as are necessary to
protect the public, the adjacent streets, utilities, Public Ways, to maintain the lateral support
thereof, or actions regarded as necessary safety precautions; and the Permittee shall be liable to
the City for the reasonable costs thereof after receipt of an itemized bill.
Section 14. Recovery of Costs. Permittee shall be subject to all permit fees associated
with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this Master Permit or under the laws of
the City. Where the City incurs costs and expenses for which a fee is not established, Permittee
shall reimburse the City the actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly
related to receiving and approving a permit, license, and this Master Permit, to inspecting plans
and construction, to supervision of activities undertaken through the authority granted in this
Master Permit or any ordinances relating to the subject for which a permit fee is not established,
or to the preparation of a detailed statement pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW. Permittee shall
further reimburse the City for Permittee's proportionate share of all actual, identified expenses
incurred by the City in planning, constructing, installing, repairing or altering any City facility as
a result of the construction or the presence in the Right -of -Way of the Permittee's Facilities. Fees
for which Permittee is responsible under this Section may include reimbursement for time
associated with attorneys, consultants, City Staff, and City Attorney's Office review.
In addition to the above, the Permittee shall promptly reimburse the City for any and all
reasonable costs the City incurs in response to any emergency involving the Permittee's Facilities.
Iff
Packet Pg. 115
8.1.b
The time of City employees shall be charged at their respective rate of salary, including
overtime if applicable plus benefits and reasonable overhead. Any other costs will be billed
proportionately on an actual cost basis. All billings will be itemized as to specifically identify the
costs and expenses for each project for which the City claims reimbursement. A charge for the
actual costs incurred in preparing the billing may also be included in said billing. The billing may
be on an annual basis or sooner, but the City shall provide Permittee with the City's itemization of
costs at the conclusion of each project for information purposes.
Section 15. Fees for Use of Public Ways.
A. Prohibition of Franchise Fee. Pursuant to RCW 35.21.860, the City is precluded
from imposing a fee on a "telephone business" or a "service provider" for use of the right-of-way,
except for administrative expenses or any applicable tax authorized by law, and other exceptions listed
therein. This Master Permit is premised upon the City and Permittee's understanding that the activities
proposed by the Permittee and authorized by the City constitute those of a "telephone business" or
"service provider." The City hereby reserves its right to impose a fee on Permittee, to the extent
authorized by law, for purposes other than to recover its administrative expenses, if the Permittee's
operations are not those of a "telephone business" or "service provider" or if statutory prohibitions on
the imposition of such fees are removed, whether by legislative or judicial action. The City also
reserves its right to require that the Permittee obtain a separate agreement for its change in use, which
agreement may include provisions intended to regulate the Permittee's operations, as allowed under
applicable law.
B. Permittee Obligated to Pay Taxes. Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to alter,
amend, or modify the taxes and fees that may lawfully be assessed on Permittee's business
activities under this Ordinance pursuant to applicable law. This Master Permit does not limit the
City's power of taxation. Permittee agrees that all of its activities in the City of Edmonds authorized
by this Master Permit are specifically taxable as a telephone business under Edmonds Municipal
Code Chapter 3, including EMC 3.20.050, and are taxable at the rate specified therein now in effect
or as amended. Permittee is subject to payment of any applicable local utility tax and any other tax
of whatever kind applicable to Permittee's operations.
C. Site Specific Charges. The City may impose a charge for use of the Right -of -
Way in the circumstances outlined in RCW 35.21.860(1)(e), and the parties agree the City may
charge an amount consistent with FCC orders. If FCC orders are no longer in effect during the
term of this Master Permit, then the parties will negotiate an acceptable charge. If the parties cannot
agree then they will utilize the process outlined in RCW 35.21.860(1)(e).
Section 16. Manner of Payment; Audit. Permittee shall make all required payments
under this Master Permit, including taxes, in the form, intervals, and manner requested by the City
Finance Director, and furnish him/her any information related to his/her revenue collection
functions reasonably requested. The City Finance Director may call for an audit pertaining to
payments under this Master Permit twice per calendar year and not more frequently unless the
Finance Director has a reasonable basis therefore. In case of audit, the City Treasurer may require
Permittee to furnish a verified statement of compliance with Permittee's obligations or in response
11
Packet Pg. 116
8.1.b
to any questions. Said certificate may be required from an independent, certified public accountant,
at Permittee's expense. Permittee agrees, upon request of the City Treasurer, to provide copies of
all documents filed with any federal, state, or local regulatory agency affecting any of Permittee's
Facilities or related business operations pursuant to this Master Permit.
Permittee agrees that it will manage all of its operations in accordance with a policy of keeping
books and records open and accessible to the City. Without limiting its obligations under this
Master Permit, Permittee agrees that it will collect and make available books and records for
inspection and copying by the City in order to ensure the operations of Permittee are that of a
telephone business or service provider pursuant to RCW 35.21.860. Permittee shall be responsible
for collecting the information and producing it. Books and records shall be produced to the City at
one of Permittee's physical offices in the State of Washington in the greater Seattle area or such
other location as the parties may agree. Permittee shall take all steps required, if any, to ensure
that it is able to provide the City all information which must be provided or may be requested
under this Master Permit, including providing appropriate subscriber privacy notices. Nothing in
this Master Permit shall be read to require Permittee to violate 47 USC Section 551. Permittee
shall be responsible for redacting any date that federal law prevents it from providing to the City.
Permittee shall have the right to have its employee and agents physically present at all times that
the City, its employees or agents are conducting any such audit and representatives of the City
shall comply with Permittee's standard accounting policies and procedures pertaining the City's
auditing of Licensee's accounting records which are considered by Licensee to be proprietary and
confidential. Records shall be kept for at least six years. Permittee shall maintain records sufficient
to show its compliance with the requirements of this Master Permit and shall produce those records
within thirty (30) days of a City request. Such written notice from the City must identify with
specificity the period for which the City wishes to conduct its audit.
Section 17. Indemnification and Waiver. As consideration for the issuance of this Master
Permit, Permittee shall indemnify the City as follows:
A. Permittee hereby releases, covenants not to bring suit and agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents,
consultants, volunteers, and representatives from any and all claims, costs, judgments, awards or
liability to any Person arising from injury, sickness, or death of any Person or damage to property:
For which the negligent acts or omissions of Permittee, its agents, servants,
officers or employees in performing the activities authorized by this Master
Permit are the proximate cause;
2. By virtue of Permittee's exercise of the rights granted herein;
3. By virtue of the City permitting Permittee's use of the City's Public Ways
or other public property;
4. Based on the City's inspection or lack of inspection of work performed by
Permittee, its agents and servants, officers or employees in connection with
12
Packet Pg. 117
8.1.b
work authorized on a Facility, the Public Ways, or property over which the
City has control pursuant to this Master Permit or pursuant to any other
permit or approval issued in connection with this Master Permit;
5. Arising as a result of the negligent acts or omissions of Permittee, its agents,
servants, officers or employees in barricading, instituting trench safety
systems or providing other adequate warnings of any excavation,
construction, or work upon the Public Ways, in any Public Way, or other
public place, or work upon a Facility, in performance of work or services
under this Master Permit; and
6. Based upon radio frequency emissions or radiation emitted from
Permittee's equipment or Facilities, regardless of whether Permittee's
equipment or Facilities complies with applicable federal statutes and/or
FCC regulations related thereto.
B. The provisions of Subsection A of this Section shall apply to claims against the
City by Permittee's own employees and the employees of the Permittee's agents, representatives,
contractors, and subcontractors to which Permittee might otherwise be immune under Title 51
RCW. It is expressly agreed and understood that this assumption of potential liability for actions
brought against the City by the aforementioned employees is with respect to claims against the
City arising by virtue of Permittee's exercise of its rights. To the extent required to provide this
indemnification, Permittee waives its immunity under Title 51 RCW as provided in RCW 4.24.115.
This waiver of immunity under Title 51 RCW has been mutually negotiated by the parties hereto,
and Permittee acknowledges that the City would not enter into this Master Permit without
Permittee's waiver thereof.
C. Inspection or acceptance by the City of any work performed by the Permittee at the
time of completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants
of indemnification. Provided that Permittee has been given prompt written notice by the City of
any such claim, said indemnification obligations shall also extend to claims which are not reduced
to a suit and any claims which may be compromised prior to the culmination of any litigation or
the institution of any litigation. Permittee shall control the defense of any claim under which it is
providing indemnification, and the City has the right to participate in the defense of any such claim,
and has the right to approve any settlement or other compromise of any such claim.
D. If Permittee refuses the tender of defense in any suit or any claim, said tender having
been made pursuant to this Section, and said refusal is subsequently determined by a court having
jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to the matter), to have been a
wrongful refusal on the part of the Permittee, then Permittee shall pay all of the City's costs for
defense of the action, including all reasonable expert witness fees, reasonable attorney's fees, the
reasonable costs of the City, and reasonable fees of recovering under this Subsection.
E. The obligations of Permittee under the indemnification provisions of this Section
shall apply regardless of whether liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to Persons or
13
Packet Pg. 118
8.1.b
damages to property were caused or contributed to by the City, its officers, agents, employees or
contractors except to the extent that such claims, actions, damages, costs, expenses, and attorney's
fees were caused by the sole negligence or any willful, malicious, or criminal act on the part of the
City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. In the event that a court of competent
jurisdiction determines that a Master Permit is subject to the provisions RCW 4.24.115, the parties
agree that the indemnity provisions hereunder shall be deemed amended to conform to said statute
and liability shall be allocated as provided therein.
F. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Section, Permittee assumes the risk
of damage to its Facilities located in the Public Ways and upon City -owned property occurring as
a result of or in connection with any public works, public improvements, construction, excavation,
grading, filling, or work of any kind on such City property or within the Public Ways by or on
behalf of the City, regardless of whether such activities are conducted by the City, its officers,
agents, employees and contractors, except to the extent any such damage or destruction is caused
by or arises from the sole negligence or any willful, malicious, or criminal act on the part of the
City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. Permittee releases and waives any and all such
claims against the City, its officers, agents, employees or contractors. In no event shall the City be
liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, exemplary, or punitive damages,
including by way of example and not limitation lost profits, lost revenue, loss of goodwill, or loss
of business opportunity in connection with its performance or failure to perform. Permittee further
agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City against any claims for damages, including,
but not limited to, business interruption damages and lost profits, brought by or under users of
Permittee's Facilities as the result of any interruption of service due to damage or destruction of
Permittee's Facilities caused by or arising out of activities conducted by the City, its officers,
agents, employees or contractors, except to the extent any such damage or destruction is caused
by or arises from the sole negligence or any willful or malicious actions on the part of the City, its
officers, agents, employees or contractors.
G. These indemnification requirements shall survive the expiration, revocation, or
termination of this Master Permit or any other permits or approvals related thereto.
Section 18. Insurance. The Permittee, and any subcontractors performing services on its
behalf, shall procure and maintain insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which may arise from or in connection with the exercise of the rights, privileges and
authority granted hereunder to the Permittee, its agents, representatives or employees. The
Permittee shall provide to the City, for its inspection, an insurance certificate together with an
endorsement including the City, and its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents, consultants, volunteers, and representatives as additional insureds prior to the
commencement of any work or installation of any Facilities pursuant to this Master Permit. Such
insurance certificate shall evidence:
A. Commercial general liability insurance as per ISO Form CG 00 01 or its
equivalent, written on an occurrence basis, including contractual liability coverage, and shall cover
liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products -completed
operations, personal injury and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract.
14
Packet Pg. 119
8.1.b
There shall be no exclusion for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property
damage. The Public Entity shall be included as an additional insured under the Permittee's
Commercial General Liability insurance policy by endorsement with respect this Master Permit
using ISO endorsement CG 20 12, with limits of $5,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in
the aggregate for bodily injury and property damage.
B. Commercial Automobile liability covering all owned, non -owned, hired and
leased vehicles with a combined single limit of $5,000,000.00 for each accident for bodily injury
and property damage. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (ISO) form
CA 00 01.
C. Worker's compensation within statutory limits and employer's liability insurance
with limits of $1,000,000.00 each accident/disease/policy limit, which may be self -insured by
Permittee for this Section 18.C. The Permittee shall provide stop gap employer liability coverage
in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident, per disease policy limit, per disease per employee.
D. Contractors Pollution Liability coverage or self-insurance in the amount of
$2,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate covering third party claims for bodily injury, property
damage or cleanup costs as required by law, where the pollution is caused during and by
Permittee's operations under this Agreement.
E. Excess umbrella liability policy with limits of $5,000,000 per occurrence and in
the annual aggregate. It shall be excess over Permittee's Commercial General Liability and
Automobile Liability insurance.
F. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a rating of A.M. Best & Company's
Key rating Guide of A, VII Overall and a Financial Size Category of VII. The liability insurance
policies required by this Section shall be maintained by the Permittee throughout the term of this
Master Permit, and such other period of time during which the Permittee is operating without a
Master Permit hereunder, or is engaged in the removal of its Facilities. Payment of deductibles
and self -insured retentions shall be the sole responsibility of the Permittee. The commercial
general liability insurance required by this Section shall contain a clause stating that the coverage
shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought. The
Permittee's insurance shall be primary insurance with respect to the City, its elected and appointed
officers, officials, employees, agents, consultants, volunteers, and representatives. Any insurance
maintained by the City shall be in excess of the Permittee's insurance and shall not contribute with
it. Permittee's maintenance of insurance shall not be construed to limit the liability of Permittee to
the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy
available at law or equity.
G. In addition to the coverage requirements set forth in this section, Permittee must
notify the City of any cancellation or reduction of any required coverage that is not replaced.
Within 30 days after receipt by the City of said notice, and in no event later than 15 days prior to
said cancellation or intent not to renew, Permittee shall obtain and furnish to the City a replacement
insurance certificate meeting the requirements of this Section.
15
Packet Pg. 120
8.1.b
Section 19. Inventory.
Permittee shall maintain a current inventory of its Facilities throughout the Term of Master
Permit. Permittee shall provide to the City a copy of the inventory report no later than one hundred
eighty (180) days after the Effective Date of this Master Permit, and shall be updated within thirty
(30) days of request by the City. The inventory report shall be provided in hard copy and digital
copy. The inventory report shall include GIS coordinates, date of installation, type of pole used for
installation, description/type of installation for each Small Wireless Facility installation and
photographs taken before and after the installation of the Small Wireless Facility and taken from
the public street. Small Wireless Facilities that are abandoned or whose use has been discontinued
per ECDC 20.50.140, shall be included in the inventory report and Permittee shall provide the
same information as is provided for active installations as well as the date the Small Wireless
Facilities were abandoned or discontinued, and the date of removal from the Right -of -Way. The
City shall compare the inventory report to its records to identify any discrepancies, and the parties
will work together in good faith to resolve any discrepancies. Permittee is not required to report
on future inventory reports any abandoned or discontinued Small Wireless Facilities which were
removed from the Right -of -Way since the last reported inventory. Inventory required to be
maintained and provided under this Section 19 shall be at no cost to the City.
After construction is complete, Permittee shall provide the City with accurate copies of all
as -built plans and maps showing the location of all components meeting the definition of Facilities
placed in the Right -of -Way, in a form and content prescribed by the Public Works Director. These
plans shall be provided at no cost to the City, and shall include hard copies and digital copies in a
format specified by the Public Works Director.
Section 20. Abandonment and Removal of the Permittee's Facilities.
In addition to the abandonment and removal requirements of ECDC 20.50.140, Permittee
agrees to the following:
Upon the date of expiration, termination, or revocation of the rights granted under this Master
Permit, within sixty (60) days the Permittee must remove the Facilities and any structures in
accordance with the requirements of ECDC 20.50.140 and this Section 20. If Permittee fails to
remove all Facilities in accordance with ECDC 20.50.140 and this section, then the City shall,
upon at least thirty (30) days advance written notice to Permittee, have the authority to take any of
the following actions: (1) physically remove the Facilities and charge all costs for removal and all
costs for storage or disposal to the Permittee; (2) compel the Permittee to remove any such
Facilities through judicial action; or (3) take title of such Facilities.
Section 21. Safety Requirements.
A. Permittee shall, at all times and at its sole responsibility and expense, comply with
all applicable laws, standards and regulations relating to the installation, operation, maintenance,
16
Packet Pg. 121
8.1.b
repair and/or removal of its Facilities. In accordance with applicable federal, state, and local safety
requirements, Permittee shall at all times employ reasonable and ordinary care and shall install and
maintain and use commonly accepted methods and devices for preventing failures and accidents
which are likely to cause damage, injury, or nuisance to the public and/or workers. The Facilities
shall at all times be kept and maintained in a safe, suitable condition, and in good order and repair.
B. As an exercise of its police powers in the interest of the public health, safety, and
welfare, and to the extent not preempted by federal law, the City may require verification of
Permittee's compliance with any health and safety laws and regulations applicable to its Facilities
at Permittee's cost and expense. The City may, but shall have no obligation to, conduct inspections,
and Permittee shall cooperate with any such inspections and provide all information requested by
the City as it may reasonably determine is necessary as part of its inspection. Permittee shall
reimburse the City for its reasonable costs related to all health and safety inspections according to
the procedures of Section 14; PROVIDED THAT with respect to any RF emissions inspections,
Permittee shall only be charged if Permittee is found to be out of compliance with FCC standards.
C. If a violation of the National Electrical Safety Code or other applicable regulation
is found to exist by the City, the City will, after discussions with Permittee, establish a reasonable
time for Permittee to make necessary repairs. If the repairs are not made within the established
time frame, the City may make the repairs itself or have them made and collect all reasonable costs
thereof from Permittee.
D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either party discovers that the emissions from a
Facility exceed the FCC standards, and if discovered by the City then also after testing and
certification of test results from a qualified RF engineer, then Permittee shall immediately turn off
the Facility or portion thereof committing the violation, until the emissions exposure is remedied.
Upon any City discovery of violation, notification shall be made verbally by calling 1-800-832-
6662 and by email notice to REleaseAdmin@att.com. Permittee is required to promptly turn off
that portion of the Facility that is in violation, no later than forty-eight (48) hours after date and
time of email notice or of its own discovery of noncompliance.
E. Pursuant to ECDC 20.50.070, upon each application for a wireless
communications facility permit, Permittee shall provide the certificate of an RF engineer with
knowledge of the proposed development that the small wireless facility network will comply with
RF standards adopted by the FCC. Permittee shall further provide proof of FCC and other
regulatory approvals required to provide the service and to utilize the technology sought to be
installed. Permittee shall thereafter perform any testing and provide certification of the Facilities
as may be requested by FCC or any other government agency with the authority to regulate
exposure to RF emissions, and Permittee will provide a copy of any such compliance reports to
the City.
17
Packet Pg. 122
8.1.b
Section 22. Construction Bond. Before undertaking any of the work, installation,
improvements, construction, repair, relocation or maintenance authorized by this Master Permit,
the Permittee shall furnish a Right -of -Way Construction Bond written by a corporate surety
acceptable to the City equal to at least one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the estimated
cost of restoring the Public Ways of the City to the pre -construction condition required by Section
11 (Restoration after Construction) of this Master Permit. Said bond shall be required to remain
in full force until sixty (60) days after completion of the construction of Permittee's Facilities and
other improvements from the Public Ways of the City. In the event that a bond issued to meet the
requirements of this Section is canceled by the surety, after proper notice and pursuant to the terms
of said bond, Permittee shall, prior to expiration of said bond, be responsible for obtaining a
replacement bond which complies with the terms of this Section.
Section 23. Maintenance Bond. Permittee shall furnish a maintenance bond written by a
corporate surety acceptable to the City equal to at least fifteen percent (15%) of the original
Construction Bond amount which shall warrant all restoration work for a period of two (2) years.
The Maintenance Bond must be in place before City may release the Construction Bond. In the
event that a bond issued to meet the requirements of this Section is canceled by the surety, after
proper notice and pursuant to the terms of said bond, Permittee shall, prior to expiration of said
bond, be responsible for obtaining a replacement bond which complies with the terms of this
Section.
Section 24. Modification. The City and the Permittee hereby reserve the right to alter,
amend or modify the terms and conditions of this Master Permit upon the written agreement of
both parties to such alteration, amendment or modification. Said modifications shall be approved
by the City by ordinance and accepted by the Permittee consistent with Section 41 (Acceptance)
hereof.
Section 25. Forfeiture and Revocation.
A. This Master Permit may be terminated for failure by Permittee to comply with the
material provisions hereof and other provisions of the Edmonds Municipal Code. In addition to
termination, the City may impose lesser sanctions, including, but not limited to, monetary
penalties, for violation of this Master Permit in accordance with the terms of the Master Permit
herein.
B. If the City has reason to believe that Permittee is in violation of this Master Permit
or other provisions of the Edmonds Municipal Code, the following procedures shall be followed
by the City:
1. The City shall provide Permittee with a detailed written notice, by certified
mail, detailing the violation, the steps necessary to cure such violation, and a reasonable time
period within which the violation must be cured. Within thirty days (30) thereafter, Permittee shall
respond demonstrating that no violation occurred, that any problem has been corrected, or with a
proposal to correct the problem within a specified period of time.
Packet Pg. 123
8.1.b
2. Permittee may request an extension of time to cure an alleged violation if
construction is suspended or delayed by the City, or where unusual weather, natural consequences
(e.g., earthquakes, floods, etc.), extraordinary acts of third parties, or other circumstances which
are reasonably beyond the control of Permittee delay progress, provided that Permittee has not,
through its own actions or inactions, contributed to the delay. The amount of additional time
allowed will be determined by the City. The extension of time in any case shall not be greater than
the extent of the actual non-contributory delay experienced by Permittee.
3. If said response is not satisfactory to City, the City may declare Permittee
to be in default, with written notice to Permittee in accordance with the Notice requirements of
this Master Permit. Within ten business days after notice to Permittee, Permittee may deliver to
the City a request for a hearing before the City Council. If no such request is received, the City
may declare the Master Permit terminated for cause and/or impose lesser sanctions.
4. If Permittee files a timely written request for a hearing, such hearing shall
be held within thirty (30) days after the City's receipt of the request therefor. Such hearing shall
be open to the public and Permittee and other interested parties may offer written and/or oral
evidence explaining or mitigating such alleged non-compliance. Within ten days after the hearing,
the City Council, on the basis of the record, will make the determination as to whether there is
cause for termination, whether the Master Permit will be terminated, and/or whether lesser
sanctions should be imposed. The City Council may in its sole discretion fix an additional time
period to cure violations. If the deficiency has not been cured at the expiration of any additional
time period or if the City Council does not grant any additional period, the City Council may, by
resolution declare the Master Permit to be terminated and forfeited or impose lesser sanctions.
5. If Permittee appeals revocation and termination, such revocation may be
held in abeyance pending judicial review by a court of competent jurisdiction, provided the
Permittee is otherwise in compliance with this Master Permit. While revocation is held in
abeyance, City may suspend the issuance of additional permits. In any such appeal, Permittee
shall be responsible for the costs of preparing and filing the City's administrative record with the
Court and such costs shall be paid prior to the City's filing thereof.
C. In the event that the City elects to impose monetary penalties upon the Permittee
for failure to comply with the material provisions of this Master Permit, said penalties shall be
assessed at five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day, per violation, for each day beyond thirty (30)
days that Permittee has been in violation.
D. Monetary penalties may be assessed retroactive to the date that notification was
provided to Permittee in such cases where Permittee has been non -responsive in correcting the
violation or in the case of flagrant violations. If payment of any penalty is delinquent by three (3)
months or more, the City may: (1) require partial or total forfeiture of any performance bond, the
Security Fund, or other surety posted by Permittee; (2) terminate this Master Permit; and/or (3)
commence a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction to collect said penalty.
ILI
Packet Pg. 124
8.1.b
E. If this agreement is terminated for cause, the sixty (60) day clock referenced in
Section 20 (Abandonment and Removal of the Permittee's Facilities) begins to run the date the
City or City Council declares the Master Permit terminated for cause in accordance with the
procedures of this Section 25; Provided that if Permittee appeals revocation and termination
pursuant to paragraph B(5) of this Section 25, then paragraph B(5) shall govern.
F. Permittee shall not be deemed to be in default, failure, violation, or non-compliance
with any provision of this Master Permit where performance was rendered impossible due to
materially, substantially, and reasonably to an act of God, fire, flood, storm, or other element or
casualty, theft, war, disaster, strike, lock -out, boycott, prevailing war or war preparation, or bona
fide legal proceedings, beyond the control of Permittee.
Section 26. Security Fund.
A. At the same time as providing acceptance of this Master Permit, Permittee shall establish
a permanent security fund in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) to guarantee the full
and complete performance of the requirements of this Master Permit and to guarantee payment of
any costs, expenses, damages, or loss the City pays or incurs, including monetary penalties,
because of any failure attributable to Permittee to comply with the codes, ordinances, rules,
regulations, or permits of the City. The amount of the Security Fund shall not be construed to limit
Permittee's liability or to limit the City's recourse to any remedy to which the City is otherwise
entitled at law or in equity.
B. Permittee shall replenish the security fund within fourteen (14) days after written notice
from the City that there is a deficiency in the amount of the fund.
C. Upon termination or expiration of the Master Permit, all funds remaining in the Security
Fund shall be returned to Permittee within thirty (30) days after removal of Permittee's Facilities
in the Public Ways.
Section 27. Hazardous Substances. Permittee shall not introduce or use any hazardous
substances (chemical or waste), in violation of any applicable law or regulation, nor shall Permittee
allow any of its agents, contractors or any person under its control to do the same. Permittee will
be solely responsible for and will defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials,
employees and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, costs and liabilities including
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of or in connection with the cleanup or restoration
of any property associated with Permittee's use, storage, or disposal of hazardous substances, or
the use, storage or disposal of such substances by Permittee's agents, contractors, or other persons
acting under Permittee's control.
Section 28. City Ordinances and Regulations. Permittee agrees to comply with all present
and future federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. This Master Permit is
subject to ordinances of general applicability enacted pursuant to the City's police powers. Nothing
herein shall be deemed to direct or restrict the City's ability to adopt and enforce all necessary and
appropriate ordinances regulating the performance of the conditions of this Master Permit,
20
Packet Pg. 125
8.1.b
including any ordinance made in the exercise of its police powers in the interest of public safety
and for the welfare of the public. The City shall have the authority at all times to control by
appropriate regulations the locations, elevation, manner or construction and maintenance of any
facilities by the Permittee, and the Permittee shall promptly conform with all such regulations,
unless compliance would cause the Permittee to violate other requirements of the law.
Section 29. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions, and requirements of this Master
Permit shall be in addition to any and all other obligations and liabilities the Permittee may have
to the City at common law, by statute, or by contract. The provisions, conditions, and requirements
of Sections 8, Relocation of Facilities; 9, Undergrounding of Facilities; 10, Work in Public
Ways; 11, Restoration after Construction; 13, Dangerous Conditions, Authority for City to
Abate; 17, Indemnification and Waiver; 18, Insurance; 20, Abandonment and Removal of the
Permittee's Facilities, 26 Security Fund, and 27 Hazardous Substances, shall survive the expiration
or termination of this Master Permit, and any renewals or extensions thereof. All of the provisions,
conditions, regulations and requirements contained in this Master Permit shall further be binding
upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of the
Permittee and all privileges, as well as all obligations and liabilities of the Permittee shall inure to
its heirs, successors, and assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned wherever the
Permittee is named herein.
Section 30. Severability. In any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Master Permit
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause, or phrase of this Master Permit.
Section 31. Assignment. This Master Permit may not be assigned or transferred without
prior written notice to the City, except that the Permittee may freely assign this Master Permit
without notice in whole or part to a parent, subsidiary, or Affiliate or as part of any corporate
financing, reorganization or refinancing. In the case of transfer or assignment as security by
mortgage or other security instrument in whole or in part to secure indebtedness, such notice shall
not be required unless and until the secured party elects to realize upon the collateral.
Permittee may, without the prior written notice to the City: (i) Lease the Facilities, or any
portion thereof, to another; (ii) Grant an Indefeasible Right of User Interest in the Facilities, or any
portion thereof, to another; or (iii) Offer or provide capacity or bandwidth in its Facilities to
another, PROVIDED THAT: Permittee at all times retains exclusive control over such Facilities
and remains solely responsible and liable for the performance of all obligations under this Master
Permit, including but not limited to responsible for locating, servicing, repairing, relocating or
removing its Facilities pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Master Permit. Permittee cannot
grant any rights to a Lessee that are greater than any rights Permittee has under this Master Permit.
Any Lessee shall not be construed to be a third party beneficiary under this Master Permit.
Section 32. Vacation. The City may at any time by ordinance vacate all or any portion of
the area affected by this Master Permit, and the City shall not be liable for any damages or loss to
the Permittee by reason of such vacation. The City shall strive to notify the Permittee in writing at
21
Packet Pg. 126
8.1.b
least sixty (60) days prior to vacating all or any portion of any such area in which Permittee is
located. , This Master Permit shall terminate with respect to such vacated area after sixty (60) days
written notice to Permittee.
Section 33. Notice of Tariff Changes. If applicable to Permittee, Permittee shall, when
making application for any changes in tariffs affecting the provisions of this Master Permit, notify
the City in writing of the application and provide the Public Works Director with a copy of the
submitted application within three days of filing with the Washington Utilities and Transportation
Commission or other regulatory body. If applicable to Permittee, Permittee shall further provide
the Public Works Director with a copy of any actual approved tariff change affecting the provisions
of this Master Permit.
Section 34. Notice. All notices, requests, demands, and communications hereunder will
be given by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally
recognized overnight courier, postage prepaid, to be effective when properly sent and received,
refused or returned undelivered. Notices will be addressed to the parties as follows:
CITY:
City of Edmonds
Public Works Director
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Telephone: (425) 771-0220
With a copy to the City Attorney at the same address.
PF.RMITTF.F.-
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Attn: Network Real Estate Administration
Site No. City of Edmonds Wireless Franchise Agreement (WA)
1025 Lenox Park Blvd NE, 3rd Floor
Atlanta, GA 30319
With a copy to:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Attn: AT&T Legal Dept — Network Operations
Site No. City of Edmonds Wireless Franchise Agreement (WA)
208 S. Akard Street
Dallas, TX 75202-4206
22
Packet Pg. 127
8.1.b
Section 35. Entire Master Permit. This Master Permit constitutes the entire understanding
and agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or
understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon approval and
acceptance of this Master Permit. Provided further, that the City and Permittee reserve all rights
they may have under law to the maximum extent possible and neither the City nor Permittee shall
be deemed to have waived any rights they may now have or may acquire in the future by entering
into this Master Permit.
Section 36. Attorney's Fees. Except as otherwise provided in this Master Permit, if any
suit or other action is instituted in connection with any controversy arising under this Master
Permit, each party shall be responsible for its own attorneys' fees and costs; This section shall
have no effect on the indemnity and defense obligations of this Master Permit.
Section 37. Non -waiver. Failure of the City to declare any such breach or default
immediately upon the occurrence thereof, or delay in taking any action in connection therewith,
shall not waive such breach or default, but the City shall have the right to declare any such breach
or default at any time. Failure of the City to declare one breach or default does not act as a waiver
of the City's right to declare another breach or default.
Section 38. Governing LawNenue. This Master Permit shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington. The venue and jurisdiction over
any dispute related to this Master Permit shall be with the Snohomish County Superior Court, or,
with respect to any federal question, with the United States District Court for the Western District
of Washington, at Seattle.
Section 39. Titles. The section titles are for reference only and should not be used for the
purpose of interpreting this Master Permit.
Section 40. Acceptance. Within sixty (60) days after the passage and approval of this
ordinance, this Master Permit shall be accepted by Permittee by its filing with the City Clerk an
unconditional written acceptance thereof. Failure of the Permittee to so accept this Master Permit
within said period of time shall be deemed a rejection thereof, and the rights and privileges herein
granted shall, after the expiration of the sixty (60) day period, absolutely cease and determine,
unless the time period is extended by ordinance duly passed for that purpose.
Section 41. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5)
days after the passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
23
Packet Pg. 128
8.1.b
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
Rm
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
24
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR MICHAEL NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 129
8.1.b
SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2021, the City Council of the City
of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance,
consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, GRANTING TO NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS
PCS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A
NON-EXCLUSIVE MASTER PERMIT TO INSTALL,
OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN SMALL WIRELESS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, PRESCRIBING CERTAIN RIGHTS, DUTIES,
TERMS, AND CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO,
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2021.
City Clerk, Scott Passey
25
Packet Pg. 130
26
C
i
'L
u
a.
E
L
d
Q.
L
N
ns
L
O
E
W
4-
0
r
V
0
N
LO
O
r
N
C
CD
E
t
u
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 131
8.1.c
RESOLUTION NO. 1426
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, (1) Requesting the FCC to perform and update studies on the
potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish such findings,
and (2) Requesting Congress to determine the FCC has overstepped its bounds in
its order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing
Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019, and to adopt
H.R.530 - Accelerating Broadband Development by Empowering Local
Communities Act of 2019.
WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has jurisdiction over non-
federal wireless facilities, authorizing and licensing all non-federal devices, transmitters, and
facilities that generate Radio Frequency ("RF") radiation; and
WHEREAS federal law preempts state and local governments, including the City of Edmonds,
from considering health concerns in the regulation and placement of wireless facilities, so long
as such facilities otherwise comply with applicable federal law, and
WHEREAS the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required by the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to evaluate the effects of emissions from FCC -regulated
transmitters on the quality of the human environment; and
WHEREAS on August 1, 1996, the FCC adopted the National Council on Radiation Protection
and Measurements' recommended Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and
power density for the transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz; and
WHEREAS the FCC in 2015 last updated guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency
(RF) electromagnetic fields from wireless facilities, based primarily on recommendations of
other federal agencies after reviews of prior scientific literature related to RF biological effects,
primarily from the 1990's; and
WHEREAS currently no federally -mandated RF exposure standards exist; and
WHEREAS the FCC relies upon federal agencies with health and safety expertise, such as the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency, the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration which have assigned roles in federal law for monitoring and investigating issues
related to RF exposure; and
WHEREAS the Government Accounting Office in 2001 prepared a report of its investigation
into safety concerns related to mobile phones, and concluded that further research into wireless
technology is needed, recommending the FDA take the lead in monitoring research results; and
WHEREAS, in September 2017, 180 scientists and doctors from 36 countries sent an appeal to
the European Commission recommending a moratorium on the roll out of 5G until potential
1
Packet Pg. 132
8.1.c
hazards for human health and the environment had been fully investigated by scientists
independent from industry; and
WHEREAS, the results of the world's largest study on the link between RF radiation associated
with 2G and 3G cell phones and cancer were released on November 1, 2018, by the National
Toxicology Program, an inter -agency program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, found evidence of cancerous heart tumors, as well as some evidence of cancerous brain
tumors, in male rats exposed to high levels of RF radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cell
phones. However, researchers have cautioned that findings "do not apply to 4G or 5G
technologies;" and
WHEREAS on December 3, 2018, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal and Congresswoman Anna
G. Eshoo co-authored a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr requesting the FCC and
relevant health agencies provide them studies informing the FCC's 5F safety determination, and
while they did receive a letter from the FCC on December 17, 2018, it had no mention of 5G
safety testing; and
WHEREAS the City of Edmonds recognizes broadband networks, both wired and wireless, as
essential infrastructure fundamental to the future of Edmond's community members and
businesses; and
WHEREAS, the FCC recently issued an Order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband
Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019,
wherein it clarified when the Telecommunications Act of 1996 preempts state and local
regulations that may inhibit a mobile service provider's ability to provide a service to an area,
adopting a "material inhibition" standard and applying it to limit fees a municipality can impose
for use of its rights of way and limiting non -fee requirements such as undergrounding, aesthetics,
and minimum spacing requirements; and
WHEREAS, a number of municipalities have filed petitions for review in the Ninth Circuit,
alleging the Order exceeds the FCC's statutory authority, is arbitrary and capricious and an abuse
of discretion, and is otherwise contrary to law; and
WHEREAS this Resolution of the City would permit the City to 1) advocate for updated studies
on RF Exposure Limits, and (2) potentially influence the outcome of the proceeding for the
benefit of Edmonds community members; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Council requests of the FCC that it work in cooperation with the
FDA and other relevant federal agencies to revisit and update studies on potential health
concerns arising from RF wireless emissions and in particular addressing emissions from 5G
technology; and
Section 2. The Edmonds City Council requests the FCC make the findings from such studies
publicly available in a timely manner; and
Packet Pg. 133
8.1.c
Section 3. The Edmonds City Council requests Congress determine the FCC has overstepped its
bounds in its order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers
to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019; and
Section 4. The Edmonds City Council requests Congress adopt H.R.530 - Accelerating
Broadband Development by Empowering Local Communities Act of 2019.
Section 5. The Mayor's Office shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be sent to all members of
the FCC, to the FDA Commissioner, and to all members of the Washington Congressional
Delegation.
RESOLVED this 261h day of March, 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS
ATTEST:
CLERK, SWWPASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
AYOR, DAVE EARLING
March 22, 2019
March 26, 2019
1426
3
Packet Pg. 134
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/8/2021
Waiving Rent Payments for the Chamber of Commerce for July -September 2021
Staff Lead: Maureen Judge
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
Due to the ongoing COVD-19 pandemic revenues to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce have been
severely impacted. Yearly revenue is down due to cancelled Chamber events.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
To relieve financial stress on the Chamber, the Council is asked to consider waiving rent on their offices
at City Hall for July, August, and September --with the assumption that the Chamber will be hosting "The
Taste" in August. The monthly rent is $712.19 for a total of $2,136.57 for the three-month period.
Packet Pg. 135
9.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 06/8/2021
Amending ECC 10.80 Salary Commission
Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson
Department: Human Resources
Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson
Background/History
RCW 35.21.015 sets forth that Cities may establish a salary commission in order to address salaries of
elected officials. The City of Edmonds has established a salary commission per ECC 10.80. Currently per
ECC the Commission is set to meet every two years in odd numbered years in order to establish
compensation for elected positions in the subsequent two years. The Salary Commission is scheduled to
meet in 2021 to establish compensation for Council members and the Mayor for 2022 and 2023. The
Administration is proposing the Commission cycle change from every two years to every four years and
will meet next in 2023. Elected officials compensation would remain as currently established for 2022
and 2023. This item was first discussed at the 6/1/21 Council meeting. It is being resubmitted with no
changes for further discussion and clarification of Council direction on this item.
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the proposed code changes to ECC 10.80 Salary Commission.
Narrative
The administration is proposing a change in the regular cycle of the salary commission from every 2
years to every 4 years. The reasoning for this proposed change is that the salary changes enacted by the
commission are very similar from year to year, this means that elected officials wages tend to not have
significant jumps in any one year. Additionally, the Commission has generally chosen to align any
compensation changes to the Mayor position with the COLA for the non -represented employees.
Adversely, the staff support to assist the commission is very significant. So much so that the City felt it
necessary to hire a consultant to manage the last convening of the Commission given that the HR
Director position was vacant. The support time includes gathering initial information, preparing binders,
setting up meetings, submitting press releases, developing surveys, gathering data and gathering
additional documentation as requested by the commission. All of this works starts well prior to the
commission convening and it is estimated that there are approximately 150 staff hours needed to
support the Commission.
There is a history of the City Council making changes to the salary commission. In 2014 the City Council
dissolved the commission and no changes were made to Council or Mayor compensation in 2015 and
2016. In 2017 Council provided a COLA for the Mayor's position and then re-established the
commission. The Commission then met and set compensation for Council and Mayor in 2018 and 2019.
The Commission met in 2019 and set compensation for Council and Mayor for 2020 and 2021. Attached
is a summary of the Commission decisions since 2012.
Packet Pg. 136
9.2
The proposed code update is attached. The proposed changes address the meeting cycle moving from
every 2 years to every 4 years. Additionally it addresses that Salary Commission members would be
selected in each year in which the Commission meets. The term would be for the time period the
Commission meets and would not extend beyond that. Members may be reappointed for up to two
terms as established by RCW 35.21.015.
Attachments:
Draf Revisions to chapter 10.80 ECC
Summary of Salary Commission Decisions since 2012
Packet Pg. 137
9.2.a
Chapter 10.80
SALARY COMMISSION
Sections:
10.80.010 Created — Membership.
10.80.020 Qualifications.
10.80.030 Duties.
10.80.040 Open meetings.
10.80.050 Referendum.
10.80.010 Created — Membership.C3 SHARE
A. There is created a salary commission for the city. The commission shall consist of five members,
to be appointed by the mayor with the approval of the city council.
B. The salary commission will serve without compensation.
C. Each member of the commission shall serve a term of three ye Months, exGe t that the
members shall be a iRte f for staggered forms Of One two „r throe yearsfrom July 1 to September
30, PROVIDED THAT each such term shall only occur every four years commencing the year 2023,
and PROVIDED FURTHER THAT a member is eligible to be reappointed for a subsequent term,
subject to the term limits in subsection D, below. In between the four year cycles when the
commission is active, the commission shall remain dormant and shall have no members until the
next round of appointments are confirmed.
D. No member of the commission shall be appointed to more than two terms.
E. In the event of a vacancy in office of commissioner, the mayor shall appoint, subject to approval
of the city council, a person to serve the unexpired portion of the term of the expired position.
F. A member of the commission shall only be removed from office for cause of incapacity,
incompetence, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, or for a disqualifying change of residence.
[Ord. 4057 § 1, 2017].
10.80.020 Qualifications.0 SHARE
A. Each member of the commission shall be a resident of the city.
B. No member of the commission shall be an officer, official, or employee of the city or an immediate
family member of an officer, official, or employee of the city. For purposes of this section, "immediate
family member" means the parents, spouse, siblings, children, or dependent relatives of an officer,
official, or employee of the city, whether or not living in the household of the officer, official, or
employee. [Ord. 4057 § 1, 2017].
10.80.030 Duties.O SHARE
Packet Pg. 138
9.2.a
A. The commission shall have the duty to meet between July 1st and September 30th ef- each -add
numberedevery four years commencing the year 70172023, to review the salaries paid by the city to
each elected city official, except that the salary of the municipal court judge shall be determined in
accordance with ECC 2.15.040. If after such review the commission determines that the salary paid
to an elected city official should be increased or decreased, the commission shall file a written salary
schedule with the city clerk, prior to September 30th of the given year, indicating the increase or
decrease in salary and the effective date(s), PROVIDED THAT the earliest of any such effective
date shall be no earlier than January 1" of the following year. Prior to filing the salary schedule with
the city clerk, the city attorney shall review the salary schedule for ambiguity and legality and shall
approve the salary schedule as to form if the schedule is unambiguous and legal.
B. Any increase or decrease in salary established by the commission shall become effective and
incorporated into the city budget without further action of the city council or salary commission.
C. Salary increases established by the commission shall be effective as to all city elected officials,
regardless of their terms of office. Salary increases established by the commission shall be effective
on the next payday for city employees, or under the conditions established in the salary schedule.
D. Salary decreases established by the commission shall become effective as to incumbent city
elected officials at the commencement of their next subsequent terms of office.
E. For purposes of this chapter, "salary" means any fixed compensation paid or provided periodically
for work or services and includes, but is not limited to, wages and medical or other benefits. This
definition expressly excludes any expenses paid or reimbursed on behalf of the mayor or council
member for training and travel expenses. [Ord. 4062 § 1 2017; Ord. 4057 § 1, 2017].
10.80.040 Open meetings.O SHARE
All meetings, actions, hearings, and business of the commission shall be subject to the Open Public
Meetings Act as set forth in Chapter 42.30 RCW. Prior to the filing of any salary schedule, the
commission shall hold no fewer than two public hearings thereop within the two months immediately
preceding the filing of its salary schedule. At least one public hearing should be held prior to the
commission's development of a proposed salary schedule. At least one public hearing should be
held after the commission's development and publication of a proposed salary schedule. [Ord. 4057
§ 1, 2017].
10.80.050 Referendum.O SHARE
A. Any salary increase or decrease established by the commission pursuant to this chapter shall be
subject to referendum petition by the voters of the city, in the same manner as a city ordinance, upon
filing of a referendum petition with the city clerk within 30 days after filing of a salary schedule by the
commission. In the event of the filing of a valid referendum petition, the salary increase or decrease
shall not go into effect until approved by a vote of the people.
B. Referendum measures under this section shall be submitted to the voters of the city at the next
following general or municipal election occurring 30 days or more after the petition is filed, and shall
otherwise be governed by the provisions of the State Constitution and the laws generally applicable
to referendum measures. [Ord. 4057 § 1, 2017].
Packet Pg. 139
9.2.b
Previous Salary Commission Decisions
Year Council Salary Council Pres.
Mayor Salary COLA Comments Mayor Benefits $change Council Benefits
Effective Annual Monthly
2019 Salary Commission
2021
$136,211.04
4.00%
stated COLA
No change, tied to nonrep
$ 17,000.00
$1,000
$ 300.00
No Change, Cafeteria Plan
2019 Salary Commission
2020
$130,972.01
4.00%
stated COLA
No change, tied to nonrep
$ 16,000.00
$1,000
$ 300.00
No Change, Cafeteria Plan
2017 Salary Commision
2019
$125,934.80
3.30%
Same as Non -rep
No change, tied to nonrep
$ 15,000.00
$1,500
$ 200.00
No Change, Cafeteria Plan
2017 Salary Commision
2018
$121,911.74
3.00%
Same as Non -rep
No change, tied to nonrep
$ 13,500.00
$1,500
$ 200.00
No Change, Cafeteria Plan
City Council Budget Decision
2017
$118,360.92
1 2.50%
stated COLA
I No change, tied to nonrep
$ 12,000.00
No Change
$ 200.00
No Change, Cafeteria Plan
2014 Citizens Commission
2016
Council repealed the Citizins commision for 2014 which was prior to the filing of
the decision with the City Clerk so no changes were enacted.
No Change
2014 Citizens Commission
2015
No Change
2012 Citizens Commission
2014
$115,474.08
1.40%
Same as Non -rep
No change, tied to nonrep
$ 12,000.00
No Change
$ 200.00
No Change, Cafeteria Plan
2012 Citizens Commission
2013
$115,474.08
1 2.00%1
Same as Non -rep
I No change, tied to nonrep
1 $ 12,000.00
$ 200.00
Established Cafeteria Plan
Packet Pg. 140