Loading...
2021-08-10 City Council - Full S Agenda-29411. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. o Agenda Edmonds City Council SPECIAL MEETING - VIRTUAL/ONLINE VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE, HTTP://EDMONDSWA.IQM2.COM/CITIZENS/DEFAULT.ASPX, EDMONDS, WA 98020 AUGUST 10, 2021, 8:30 PM THIS MEETING IS HELD VIRTUALLY USING THE ZOOM MEETING PLATFORM. TO VIEW OR LISTEN TO THIS EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING, PASTE THE FOLLOWING INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. CLOSED CAPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE USING THE ZOOM PLATFORM. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER." - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AUDIENCE COMMENTS COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Bond Financing: Refunding, and Sale of New Bonds (90 min) COUNCIL COMMENTS MAYOR'S COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Agenda August 10, 2021 Page 1 ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda August 10, 2021 Page 2 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/10/2021 Bond Financing: Refunding, and Sale of New Bonds Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History Discussion of City financing needs and options to choose from to meet those needs. These items have all been discussed in previous committee meetings and council meetings. Staff Recommendation We would like to have a recommendation from Council to move forward with bond refunding and the sale of new bonds. Narrative: The City has financing needs to discuss. Scott Bauer from Northwest Municipal Advisors will be in attendance to answer questions related to the refunding and issuance of bonds. 1) We have an opportunity to refund our 2011 20-year Sewer Revenue Bonds, potentially saving the City over $1 million net present value. 2) The Edmonds Center for the Arts Public Facilities District has asked us to refinance approximately $2.6 million of bonds on their behalf, through 2041. 3) Staff is requesting additional funding via the sale of $6 million of bonds to fund capital projects, including Civic Field. Attachments: 1 Bond Pres to Council July 13 2 NW Munic Advisors Presentation August 10 2021 3 Facilities Maintenance Report 4 Memorandum to Edmonds Mayor M. Nelson Packet Pg. 3 Bond Sales and Refunding and a Request for Council Approval to Proceed August 10, 2021 City Council Meeting Off" Ep�4�� v Packet Pg. 4 What is the purpose of this evening's discussion? • We would like to move forward with the refunding of certain outstanding bonds, as well as issue new bonds to help fund capital projects. • There are three separate items to discuss: A. Refunding of outstanding Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds— 2011 B. Advance refund and restructure a portion of the City's Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds — 2021 (on behalf of the Edmonds Public Facilities District) C. Issue new bonds for Civic Field and other capital improvements Off" F.Dj t r� U Packet Pg. 5 A. Refunding of outstanding Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds — 2011 • Due to continued low interest rates, we have the opportunity to refund $8.045 million in outstanding sewer revenue bonds, saving the city an estimated net present value of $1.19 million. • Scott Bauer from Northwest Municipal Advisors is here tonight to present information about this. • This was previously discussed in Finance Committee on July 13, if you would like to view the presentation. The Finance Committee's recommendation to Council on July 13 was to proceed with the refunding. Packet Pg. 6 ADMINISTRATIVE 6.1.a B. Advance refund and restructure a portion of the-\-.,Tq 3 Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds — 2021 (on d behalf of the Edmonds Public Facilities District) • The Edmonds Public Facilities District has requested that the City refund and restructure $2.585 million of bonds on their behalf. Additional information about this request is included in tonight's packet. • Scott Bauer from Northwest Municipal Advisors is here tonight to present information about this. • This was previously discussed in Finance Committee on July 13, if you would like to view the presentation. The Finance Committee's recommendation to Council on July 13 was to proceed with the refunding. Off" EDP t r� U Packet Pg. 7 C. Issue new bonds for Civic Field and other capital improvements The Civic Field construction contract was approved by Council on July 13. At that time the funding shortfall was identified, and bond financing was discussed. Staff would also like to request additional bonding to fund other capital improvement projects, specifically money to begin to address the Facilities Maintenance backlog. This backlog has been discussed at previous Council meetings. Additional information about projects this money would be used for is included in tonight's packet. Scott Bauer from Northwest Municipal Advisors is here tonight to present information about this. Additional funding for Civic Field was previously discussed in Finance Committee on April 13 and July 13, and with full Council on July 6 and July 13, if you would like to view those presentations. The Finance Committee's recommendation to Council on July 13 was to proceed with issuing bonds for Civic Field and the other capital projects, with the need to decide on the dollar amount and repayment term at a later date. We hope that later date will be tonight. r� U s a Packet Pg. 8 Staff Recommendation • Regarding the Sewer Bond refunding and the refunding on behalf of the PFD, Staff agrees with the Finance Committee's recommendation to move forward with these actions. • Regarding the bonding for capital projects, Staff's recommendation is to sell $6 million in new bonds. The intention is to provide $2 million to fully fund Civic Field, and an additional $4 million to go into Fund 016, the Building Maintenance Fund, to be used to begin to address our backlog of facilities maintenance. • After tonight's presentation by Scott Bauer and Council discussion, Staff would ask for Council approval to move forward with refunding the $8.045 million of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, the advance refunding of $2.585 million on behalf of the Edmonds Public Facilities District, and the issuance of $6 million in new bonds for capital projects. Packet Pg. 9 Questions? Next: Scott Bauer from Northwest Municipal Advisors r r C 0 E r� U Packet Pg. 10 6.1.b City of Edmonds, Washington Presentation to City Council Limited Tax General Obligation and Refunding Bonds, 2021, Series A and B Northwest Municipal Advisors August 10, 2021 NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL ADVISnQs 6.1.b Potential 2021 LTGO Bond 1. Provide $2 to $8 million for Civic Park and other capital improvements • 2. Refund for savings the Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2011 — $8.045 million to be refinanced, representing the callable maturities from 2022 to 2031 — No change in shape or final maturity (12/1/2031) 3. Advance refund and restructure a portion of the City's Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2012 (the "2012 Bonds") — Portion attributable to the Edmonds Public Facilities District • All outstanding debt to be refunded = $2.585 million — Avoid December 1, 2021 payment — Extend the final maturity to 2041 • Allows the PFD to receive the State Sales and Use Tax Rebate until 2041 • Lowers annual debt service payments — Issued as a taxable series due to federal tax law — Unrefunded portion of the 2012 Bonds would remain outstanding NORTHWEST z MUNICIPAL ADVI Packet Pg. 12 Historical Interest Rates Interest rates continue near historically low levels U_ The charts below show an index of 20 long-term, well -rated general obligation bonds Bond Buyer 20-Bond General Obligation Index 1990 to Present 7.50 6.50 5.50 ?' 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0r-INM:I, Ln cDnW My r-iN mTI, Ln cn �W My r-iN mTI, Ln cn� WMv­1 M M M M M M M M M rn v v v v v v v v v v N N rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v rl r-I rl r-I rl r-I rl r-I rl r-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 4.80 4.30 3.80 3.30 2.80 2.30 1.80 arc lad Bond Buyer 20-Bond General Obligation Index July 2018 to Present NORTHWEST 3 MUNICIPAL ADVI Packet Pg. 13 Outstanding Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds PFD maturities to be refunded City portions remain outstanding LTGO Bonds LT12 LTGO Ref 2016 LTGO 2019 Total LTGO Bonds Debt $1, 600, 000 $1,400,000 $1, 2 00, 000 $1, 000, 000 $ 800, 000 $ 600, 000 400, 000 $ 200, 000 Par Outstanding Callable Par Final Maturity Coupon Range Call Date $ 3,895,000 $ 2,635,000 12/1/2031 1.75% - 3.00% 12/1/2022 1,968,013 1,008,918 12/1/2026 1.67% 12/1/2023 3,375,000 2,230,000 12/1/2039 2.125% - 5.00% 6/1/2029 $ 9,238,013 $ 5,873,918 1 ■ LTGO Ref 2012 ■ LTGO Ref 2016 LTGO 2019 NORTHWEST 4 MUNICIPAL ADVISODS Packet Pg. 14 R c ii c 0 m N O N O a� Q c 0 r c a� a 0 Q r- Z N r r Q Outstanding Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds — PFD Portion 6) U- PFD Portion of City Bonds Par Outstanding Callable Par Final Mat. Coupon Range Call Date o m LTGO Ref $ 2,585,000 $ 1,755,000 12/1/2026 1.75% - 3.00% 12/1/2022 N Total PFD Bonds Debt $ 2,585,000 $ 1,755,000 N $ 600, 000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $ 200, 000 $100,000 ti°�h tioyo LTGO Ref 2012 (PFD Portion of 2012 Bands) r a NORTHWEST 5 MUNICIPAL ADVISODS Packet Pg. 15 Outstanding Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Water and Sewer Bonds WS Improv. and Ref. Rev 2011 WS Rev 2013 WS Rev 2015 WS Rev 2020 Total Water and Sewer Bonds Debt $3,500,000 To be refunded Par Outstanding Callable Par Final Mat. Coupon Range Call Date $ 8,705,000 $ 8,045,000 12/1/2031 3.00% - 4.00% 12/1/2021 13,730,000 13,285,000 12/1/2038 4.00% - 5.00% 6/1/2023 15,945,000 13,570,000 12/1/2040 2.00% - 4.00% 6/1/2025 13,875,000 13,875,000 12/1/2045 2.00% - 2.25% 6/1/2030 $ 52,255,000 $ 48,775,000 .ty y'L y� ,LR ti� ti� tit Lq' ti� 50 �� �ti S5 )t0 ,r ��° ,1 �� �°� Rz oti N-" N", pP- D� do do ,yo �o ,yo ,yo do do ,yo �o ,yo ,yo do • WS Improv. and Ref. Rev 2011 ■ WS Rev 2013 WS Rev 2015 6 WS Rev 2020 Q NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL ADVISnQQ Packet Pg. 16 New Project Money Debt Service Comparison The table shows estimated debt service for between $2 and $8 million in net proceeds amortized over 10 and 20 years $2 Million Proceeds $4 Million Proceeds $6 Million Proceeds 10 Year Amortization 20 Year Amortization 10 Year Amortization 20 Year Amortization 10 Year Amortization 20 Year Amortization Calendar Year Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service 2022 $ 208,563 $ 120,038 $ 427,125 $ 239,960 $ 630,417 $ 359,402 2023 210,750 122,150 426,000 244,194 636,750 360,794 2024 214,000 119,150 427,250 243,194 636,250 362,044 2025 211,750 121,150 422,750 241,944 639,750 362,794 2026 214,250 122,900 422,750 240,444 637,000 363,044 2027 211,250 119,400 427,000 243,694 638,250 362,794 2028 213,000 120,900 425,250 241,444 638,250 362,044 2029 214,250 122,150 422,750 243,944 637,000 360,794 2030 215,000 123,150 424,500 240,944 639,500 359,044 2031 215,250 118,900 425,250 242,694 640,500 361,794 2032 - 119,650 - 238,944 - 363,794 2033 121,050 241,744 362,794 2034 122,250 239,144 361,394 2035 118,250 241,344 359,594 2036 120,250 240,194 360,444 2037 122,100 238,894 360,994 2038 119,900 239,594 359,494 2039 122,150 239,094 361,244 2040 119,850 239,594 359,444 2041 122.550 239,994 362.544 $8 Million Proceeds 61 C 10YearAmortization 20 Year Amortizat Z C ca Debt Service Debt Service $ 843,708 $ 47811. ILL 847,000 482,1 849,750 480,. m 851,000 483,! .. 850,750 480,! N 849,000 482,( N 850,750 482,- G 850,750 482,- r 849,000 482,( to 850,500 480,! t al - 483,. Q 483,( 478,, .O r - 482,! � 480,! 482,! N 479,: 483,: N 479,: TIC=1.01% TIC=1.77% TIC=1.01% TIC=1.77% TIC=1.01% TIC=1.77% TIC=1.01% TIC=1.77% Average Annual Debt Service Proceeds 10 Year 20 Year $2 Million $ 212,806 $ 120,894 $4 Million $ 425,063 $ 241,050 $6 Million $ 637,367 $ 361,314 $8 Million $ 849,221 $ 481,513 7 Annual Difference from 10 Year $ (91,912) $ (184,013) $ (276,053) $ (367,708) NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL ADVISODS Packet Pg. 17 6.1.b Considerations and Additional Items Based on the potential projects/refinancings to include in the bond issue, it appears the bonds would U_ be sold in two series o 2021A Tax -Exempt: New money proceeds and refunding of the 2011 Water and Sewer Bonds N — 2021B Taxable: Advance refunding of the Edmonds PFD's portion of the City's 2012 LTGO Bonds — The new money and refundings could be structured individually, but would roll up to their respective series — Costs of issuance • Shared costs of issuance would be allocated based on size of each financing • Specific costs, such as refunding trustee or the PFD's financial and legal advisors (if any), would be allocated to the specific project or series Timing — Bond issues take about 3 months to complete — Starting now would allow the City to close a bond issue around October/November which would achieve both timing goals • After September 1 for a current refunding of the City"s 2011 Water and Sewer Bonds • Before December 1 for the Edmonds PFD to defer their December 1, 2021 payment NORTHWEST s MUNICIPAL ADVISOUS Packet Pg. 18 6.1.c a try file 01 Yuer Building City of Edmonds Facility Condition Assessment EDMONDS, WA JUNE 2019 Uj H Uj Packet Pg. 19 1 6.1.c SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 2. LOCATION SUMMARIES SECTION 3. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE SECTION 4. EQUIPMENT INVENTORY f il1Stry PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL Packet Pg. 20 6.1.c _ 0 m 3 a� z 4- 0 m _ Cu ai _ _ _ a� o: _ _ R _ LL 0 m r _ 0 N m o: r L 0 Q U _ Cu _ r _ .C� C y Q R LL M r-+ _ d E t V R a f il1Stry PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL Packet Pg. 21 6.1.c Purpose: This study is a high-level review of the existing conditions of facilities owned by the City of Edmonds. For this report, we evaluated exterior and interior systems of the facilities. The exterior systems included building envelope, exterior finishes, and windows, as well as roofs and related components such as roof drain systems and rooftop mechanical equipment. Foundation conditions are assessed to the degree possible through observation, as are other general concerns such as adequate services, ventilation, and other site systems like fences and parking lots. Interior areas were also assessed for their general condition and evidence of problems with building systems. In addition to the general condition of the building systems, the team assigned estimated remaining life of the systems. The buildings that were looked at during this study were: Boys and Girls Club Cemetery Building City Hall Civic Center Grandstand Fishing Pier (includes Ranger Station) Fire Station #16 Fire Station #17 Fire Station #20 Frances Anderson Center Historic Log Cabin Historical Museum Library Meadowdale Club House Old Public Works Parks Maintenance Building Public Safety Public Works O&M Senior Center * Wade James Theater Yost Pool House * Factor separately, information still included in report data for reference Methodology: 1. DOCUMENTATION REVIEW AND INTERVIEWS WITH KEY ON -SITE PERSONNEL - The condition assessment team reviewed available documents to familiarize themselves with the facilities and to verify the accuracy of information collected versus existing. Interviews with on -site occupants and maintenance staff is then performed to gather critical information on historic performance and known deficiencies. 2. WALK-THROUGH SURVEY BY A TEAM OF FIELD OBSERVERS REPRESENTING KEY DISCIPLINES: • Description of the building systems • Determination of the estimated remaining life of each building systems; • Identify major building and maintenance deficiencies (backlog maintenance) likely to be addressed over a time period by the owner; 3. PREPARE OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST TO REPLACE EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS -Utilizing our team's experience with all of the building systems, cost data, and the client's past a experiences, an opinion of probable cost will be developed for each element within the report to assist in establishing appropriate capital budgets to be used in determining the Net Present Value of the Asset. rnstry CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY +fie M bw FMy Packet Pg. 22 6.1.c 4. PREPARE THE FCA REPORT - Compile all field observation reports, along with documented interviews into a final working presentation document. Review Participants: Name: Organization: Ryan Dickerson McKinstry - Project Director Eric Caldwell McKinstry - Auditor Peter Goodall McKinstry - Architect Isaac Fones McKinstry - Auditor Scoring Criteria: At each location, the equipment and systems were given a score from low to high in 3 different categories The scoring is defined below: ASSET CONDITION SCORE (1 - 5) 1 - Excellent Condition New or easily restorable to "like new" condition. 2 - Good Condition Component is not new but exhibits no damage or excessive wear. 3 - Fair Condition Minor component wear, but operating properly. 4 - Poor Condition Component has significant wear and is approaching the end of its expected useful life. 5 - Unsatisfactory Component is at or past its expected useful life, has major damage, complete failure, or in need of replacement. OCCUPANT IMPACT SCORE (1 - 5) 1 - No Occupant Impact Occupants will not be effected if the system or equipment fail. 2 - Little Occupant Impact Few occupants will be minorly effected by the failure of the system or equipment.. Wry CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY ,n m mr. iwury Packet Pg. 23 6.1.c 3 — Moderate Occupant Impact Manv occupants may be moderately or slightly impacted by the failure of the system or equipment. 4 — High Occupant Impact Manv or all occupants may be hiahlv impacted by the failure of the eauipment or 5 — Extreme Occupant Impact Many or all occupants may not be able to perform their work because of the failure of the equipment or CONSTITUENT FACING (1 — 5) 1 — No Constituent Facing No or very little public access to the buildings. 2 — Low Constituent Facing Low foot traffic from public visitors. 3 — Moderate Constituent Facing Moderate foot traffic from public visitors. 4 — High Constituent Facing High foot traffic from public visitors. 5 — Extreme Constituent Facing Very high foot traffic from public visitors. Y—!7 CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY mar n.�i.nr� Packet Pg. 24 6.1.c _ 0 m 3 a� z 4- 0 m _ Cu ai _ _ _ a� o: _ U _ R _ LL 0 m r _ 0 N m o: r L 0 Q U _ Cu _ r _ .C� C y Q R LL M r-+ _ d E t V R a try CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY h iYY uY Ytir Fu�YY�l.y Packet Pg. 25 6.1.c _ 0 m 3 a� z 4- 0 m _ Cu ai _ _ _ a� o: _ _ R _ LL 0 m r _ 0 N m o: r L 0 Q U _ Cu _ r _ .C� C y Q R LL M r-+ _ d E t V R a f il1Stry PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL Packet Pg. 26 6.1.c Boys and Girls Club General Description: The Boys and Girls Club is a two-story wooden building of approximately 5,580 SF. It was constructed circa 1925 (or 1900 per Snohomish County Records) as the fieldhouse for the adjacent football field. At the time, the high School was nearby, although it was relocated in 1957. The lower floor of the building contains several rooms for member use, as well as an office, storage rooms, and restroom facilities. The second floor is primarily a gymnasium with associated office and storage spaces. The second floor is primarily accessed by the exterior stair, with a second one toward the rear of the building. There is also an outbuilding located to the east, more associated with the athletic fields. Site: The building is located at the west edge of the football fields at the Civic Center Playfield. While the street is somewhat lower and slopes down toward the north, the building site is flat and level with the surrounding playfields. Building History: The building was significantly remodeled in 1999, to the point where it is no longer eligible for Historic Registry. Windows have been replaced at some time with insulated glazing. 1 Packet Pg. 27 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: Immediately around the building it is primarily paved in asphalt. In front of the building there are curb cuts that allow vans onto the asphalt surface. The asphalt is worn and patched. Exterior: The building exterior is in poor condition. It has a horizontal siding that is a composite wood / resin material similar to LP (Louisiana Pacific) siding, which is failing and falling apart. While some of this has been replaced, it is in generally poor condition and will allow water into the wall framing, causing more serious damage. Wooden sills and trim caps are also badly damaged. AM 4-M NE;-"c 2 Packet Pg. 28 6.1.c Building Interior: Interior finishes are generally aged and worn. On the main level, floor tiles have been damaged by settlement. The gymnasium floor appears to be in good condition. Outbuilding: The outbuilding appears to be storage for athletic equipment. It was not accessible, but appears to need maintenance Synopsis of Observations: 3 Packet Pg. 29 6.1.c The building is in poor condition and likely does not serve its current purpose well due to its size and configuration. The roof was not accessible and was not reviewed. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Replace failing siding, including weather resistive barriers below. Review wall for structural damage 2. Replace failing window and building trim 3. Repaint and reseal building 4. Replace failed glazing units 5. Replace cracked floor tiles. Commentary on Report by Cardno: This building was not included in the Cardno report because the city did not own it at the time of that study. $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 ■ Boys and Girls Club BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB 2 $38,034 4 3 $27,733 9 4 $37,453 5 $32,077 Packet Pg. 30 �S R Cemetery Office and Shop General Description: The Cemetery Office and Shop is a small building reminiscent of a single-family home. It contains an office, restroom, and a garage. A second floor accessible from the garage is used for storage. It was constructed in 1985. The area is listed at 759 SF in the Cardno report. The building does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The cemetery is generally level. The site seems damp, although this could be a factor of irrigation and landscaping. Building History: A shed has been added at the southwest side, although it's age is not certain. The Cardno report references late-80's and mid-90's for additions and renovations. 1 Packet Pg. 31 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: As already noted, the site appears that it may be damp. There were no other problems observed. Exterior: The building has wood siding in need of paint. The shed has siding too close to the grade, where moisture is damaging the siding. V 2 Packet Pg. 32 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is very simple, and in relatively good condition. The bathroom does not meet current accessibility codes, although the building predates the Americans with Disabilities Act. Synopsis of Observations: The building is in average condition. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Repaint exterior, paying special attention to condition of siding near grade. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The Cardno report suggest replacement of shingles on some roof areas. While this was not observed as a problem, it is a matter of degree and may require further review. x w a Q U $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 ■ Cemetery Building 1 $455 CEMETERY BUILDING 2 $1,954 3 0 3 $2,094 4 $8,414 5 $3,377 Packet Pg. 33 6.1.c 161 4V. a Edmonds City Hall General Description: Edmonds City Hall was constructed circa 1979 as an office building, and has been owned by the city and used as the city hall since 1997. The 34,074 SF. building is a 3-story structure over an open parking area, accessed from the rear of the building. There is a concrete floor slab separating the parking from the floors above, which are wood framed. Exterior walls are painted split -face CMU (concrete masonry units) The roof is flat, with a granular surface. A recessed area toward the center of the roof allows placement of mechanical units. The building does not have a sprinkler system. The building has insulated aluminum windows, with aluminum storefronts along the street. A standing - seam metal canopy provides weather protection to the sidewalk. Interior finishes are typical office; gypsum wallboard, acoustic ceiling tiles, VCT (vinyl composition tile) and carpet. There is a single, hydraulic elevator. Two stairs provide emergency egress, with the more central of them open to the exterior wall and providing pleasant views to the exterior. Site: The building is at the sidewalk along the front, East side, and to the property line at the north. The site slopes down to the west (rear) of the site, where there is a mix of surface parking and access to the covered, but not enclosed, parking below the building. This area is paved in asphalt. To the south of the 1 Packet Pg. 34 6.1.c building is an additional asphalt parking lot, which includes charging stations for electric vehicles. There are also public restrooms and a small landscaped plaza. Building History: The building was apparently renovated circa 1999. There is no evidence of significant changes or repairs. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: Site: Asphalt parking surfaces behind the building are cracked and have eroded surfaces. Building Exterior: The CMU Building exterior is painted and appears to be in generally good condition. No problems were observed, although in several places a change to new, smaller light fixtures have left unpainted CMU visible. At the building entry, the canopy is glazed with wire glass. Wire glass is a relatively weak material, and there is some cracking in the panes from impact. The wire should prevent the glass from falling apart or coming out of the frames, so it is unlikely this is a safety issue. M"W "� r 2 Packet Pg. 35 6.1.c Glazing: The building has strips of windows in aluminum frames, as well as a storefront system along the street fagade. Several Insulated Glazing Units have failed, which allows condensation into the assembly. These occur in Lori Palmers office as well as that of the Fire Chief. Note that building spaces are not numbered, which makes identifying locations difficult. A consistent and visible numbering system would simplify maintenance calls. Roof: The roof is a Built -Up asphaltic assembly. A few soft spots were encountered, and the roof appears worn, although no failures were observed. Roof drains do not typically have overflows, as required by current code and good practice. The ladder to the roof is missing a bolt. Mechanical units drain condensate into the recessed central area, where some standing water was found over roof seams. Interior: Finish materials are very typical of commercial offices. Walls are finished with gypsum and show typical minor damage. Acoustic Ceiling Tile is stained in some locations, or has been painted over, and has damage from removal to access equipment above it. Carpets are slightly worn, and the Pirelli -type floor in the stair is both stained from leaks through the window wall assembly as well as some bubbling. Stair nosings are damaged in some areas. 3 Packet Pg. 36 6.1.c Other: Minor damage to the insulation scrim above the parking was observed. A cover for a wiring connection point is damaged on a light pole near the southwest corner of the site. Some steel doors are badly rusted. 4 Packet Pg. 37 6.1.c I k Synopsis of Observations: The building appears to be well constructed and reasonably well maintained. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Replace failed glazing units 2. Correctly fasten roof access ladder 3. Monitor condition of roof and clean drains on a regular schedule 4. Monitor rooftop electrical gear for rust damage 5. Repair tears in insulation scrim 6. Paint bare areas exposed by new light fixtures to prevent moisture entering block walls 7. Remove moss from cantilevered concrete walk at back of building and re -apply paint. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. Differing Opinions or Notes on Building Condition: Areas where this reviewer's opinion differs from the Cardno assessment are as follows: 1. There are large amounts of wire glass in the building. This is a material used for fire safety, not security. It can be dangerous when subject to human impact. This is not noted on the Cardno report. 5 Packet Pg. 38 6.1.c $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 x Q $300,000 U $200,000 $100,000 $0 1 ■ City Hall $171,463 CITY HALL 2 3 4 5 $479,064 $323,246 $0 $70,949 Note: The costs in Year 1 are based on replacing rooftop units like for like. While this may be the low- cost option, the current system may not meet current Energy and Ventilation code requirements. Further study and options should be provided. 11 Packet Pg. 39 6.1.c __—_4 W-Y A 'Rk L City Hall Restrooms General Description: The City Hall Restrooms is a small building adjacent to the City Hall. It contains three toilet rooms. It appears to be prefabricated concrete with brick trim, but this cannot be confirmed. A small awning protects the toilet room entrances and bulletin / display panels along the street facade. It appears to have been constructed in 2017. It does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The building is surrounded by the City Hall parking lot. Immediately in front of the building is a landscaped plaza with a sitting wall. The site is compact and in good condition. Building History: The building is new. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: 1 Packet Pg. 40 6.1.c Site: The site consists of a landscaped plaza. It is in good condition. Building Exterior: The building exterior has no observed problems. It appears to be concrete or stucco, with brick detailing. The canopy is metal. 2 Packet Pg. 41 6.1.c Interior: Interior finishes and fixtures are simple and durable. They are in good condition. Synopsis of Observations: 1. No maintenance is required Commentary on Report by Cardno: This building was constructed after the Cardno report, so it is not included in it. 3 Packet Pg. 42 6.1.c City Park Buildings General Description: The City Park contains several buildings: including two restrooms, three shelters, as shed, a gazebo and a pavilion. Most were constructed circa 1995, with the gazebo dating to 1981 and the pavilion to 2005, while the shed is of unknown age. The structures are generally constructed from concrete block, with wooden upper walls and roof framing. Roofs are typically standing seam metal. The structures are generally grouped around an area with play structures and a water play area, which were not within the scope of this review. The individual buildings range between 684 SF and 1,160 SF. None of the buildings have sprinkler systems, and most do not have alarms, either. The gazebo is of all wooden construction, and the only services are several convenience outlets. The pavilion has a wooden roof structure supported by steel columns attached to a concrete slab. Site: The buildings are clustered in the same general area, although well separated from each other. The land slopes down to the west and north, so that one of the shelters is partially embedded in the hill. Although some areas of the park appeared to be damp, there was no evidence of this impacting the buildings. Building History: There is no evidence of significant changes or repairs to the buildings. The shed once supported a now - removed wading pool, and does not appear to be in use. Packet Pg. 43 6.1.c Following is a description of the individual buildings: Bathrooms, Upper: The upper bathrooms are located relatively far from the rest of the facilities. The building has split -face CMU walls topped with wooden roof and gable structure. Uniquely, this building has a wood shake roof, with skylights into the restroom spaces. Between the restrooms is a small mechanical room with a water heater and a unit heater for freeze protection. Supplies are also stored in this room, and should be kept a safe distance from the heater. Plumbing fixtures are durable stainless steel units. Viv40 Observed Conditions: 9 1. The roof has extensive moss that will eventually damage it. Based on the age of the facility, it is likely that the roof will require replacement soon. 2. Wooden columns supporting the roof at the entrances are badly rotted at their bases. These posts should be elevated above the paving so they will not be in contact with moisture. 3. Toilet partitions are beginning to rust, mostly where exposed to "overspray". 4. Asphalt paving around the facility is beginning to crack S. Wooden eaves should be treated with a water repellent or covered in a metal flashing when re- roofing occurs. 6. Sealer should be re -applied to interior wall surfaces regularly. 7. Care should be taken to not store flammables immediately in front of the heater 2 Packet Pg. 44 6.1.c Bathrooms, Lower: The lower bathrooms are located central to the three picnic shelters. It is similar in layout to the upper bathrooms, although larger. The building has wooden exterior walls above a split face CMU base, although interior surfaces are full -height CMU. The building has a standing seam metal roof, with metal gutters and rain leaders. Observed Conditions: 1. Stain should be re -applied to the building exterior. 2. Rain leaders close to the ground are damaged from impact. A different solution should be found - such as removing them and the gutters and providing deep metal fascias with drip edges. 3. Exterior electrical outlets are missing weatherproof covers and need sealant to prevent water entry around junction boxes. 4. Exterior electrical outlets do not have ground fault protection. This can be achieved by connecting the outlets down line from a protected outlet, but it should be verified that this is the case. 5. Columns are becoming damaged where close to ground moisture. Condition of column ends should be monitored. If material is removed from the column base a means of elevating the columns above moisture should be incorporated so it no longer sits in collecting rain water. 6. The water table (trim at top of wainscot) is not sloped to drain. No damage was observed, but the lower edge of the wood siding should be monitored. 3 Packet Pg. 45 6.1.c Gazebo: The gazebo —singed as the "Rotary Bandstand" was constructed circa 1981, making it the oldest of the park structures. It has a concrete foundation and slab, and the rest of the structure is wood. Peeled logs are the primary structure, with a lumber deck supporting a shake roof above. The gazebo has lights and convenience outlets, but no other services. Observed Conditions: 1. Exterior electrical outlets do not have ground fault protection. This can be achieved by connecting the outlets down line from a protected outlet, but it should be verified that this is the case. 2. Roof has build-up of moss and needles, which should be removed. The roof does appear older, and should be reviewed once it has been cleaned and is more visible. 3. Wooden fascias have water damage and should have sealer applied. Alternately, a deep metal fascia might be used to cover the wood. 4. There is a loose bolt at the top of one of the columns. This should be tightened or otherwise investigated. 4 Packet Pg. 46 6.1.c Shed: The shed once housed equipment for a now removed wading pool. It has a concrete slab for a foundation and framed walls with no interior finishes. The roof is standing seam metal. Inside, there are both water and electrical connections. Observed Conditions: 1. Wiring should be made safe. 2. Plumbing lines should be drained during cold season to prevent freeze damage. Pavilion: The pavilion is a used as both a bandstand and a picnic shelter. As noted earlier, it is of steel and wood construction on a concrete slab. It is in good condition. 5 Packet Pg. 47 6.1.c Picnic Shelters: The three picnic shelters are essentially identical. They have timber framed roofs sheathed with standing seam metal surfaces, draining to metal gutters and rain leaders. This is supported by columns made from split face concrete masonry units. One end of the shelter has a low concrete block wall between columns that supports a counter and sink facing into the shelter. Floors are concrete. Shelter #1: (photos follow) Shelter 1 is the one lowest on the hill and closest to the parking lot. 1. The roof and gutters at the north side of the shelter are damaged, likely from falling branches. 2. The roof has large build-ups of needles, so it is likely that the gutters are as well. 3. Rain leaders are not connected between the gutters and where they enter the columns. 4. Many of the electrical outlet are missing their covers, which are not the type that can be used while something is plugged in anyway. 5. Wooden fascias should be monitored for moisture damage and the need to re -apply stain. 11 Packet Pg. 48 6.1.c Shelter #2: (photos follow) Shelter 2 is the Southernmost of the shelters. It was occupied by a summer camp group at the time of the review so it was not photographed thoroughly, although observations were made. 1. The roof has large build-ups of needles, so it is likely that the gutters are as well. 2. Rain leaders are not connected between the gutters and where they enter the columns. 3. Many of the electrical outlet are missing their covers. They should be replaced with the type of cover that can be closed while the outlet is in use. 4. Wooden fascias should be monitored for moisture damage and the need to re -apply stain. 7 Packet Pg. 49 6.1.c Shelter #3: (photos follow) Shelter 3 is the Easternmost of the shelters, closest to the playfields and water play area. It is set into the hillside, such that the wall with the counter and sink acts as a retaining wall. Like shelter #2, it was occupied at the time of the review and photo documentation reflects that. 1. The roof has build-ups of needles, so it is likely that the gutters do as well. 2. Rain leaders are not connected between the gutters and where they enter the columns. 3. Many of the electrical outlet are missing their covers, which are not the type that can be used while something is plugged in anyway. 4. Wooden fascias should be monitored for moisture damage and the need to re -apply stain. il Synopsis of Observations: The buildings appear to be well constructed and reasonably well maintained. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. Differing Opinions or Notes on Building Condition: No significant differences to note. Packet Pg. 50 6.1.c Civic Center Grandstand General Description: The Civic Field was owned by the Schools until 2016 when it was purchased by the city to become a park. The structure on the site is a wooden grandstand, which has storage areas below it. The storage areas appear to have been accessible at one point, perhaps as locker rooms, but are now sealed off from use. The Boys and Girls Club building is located on this parcel, but is covered under its own document. Proposals for a new park on the site indicate the grandstand will be demolished. It was determined not eligible to be a historic property. The grandstand does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The site is generally level, although it slopes up behind the stands leading to some soil coming in contact with the structure. The street immediately behind the stands does not have a good curb, and may drain water in the direction of the grandstand. Building History: A shed has been added at the southwest side, although it's age is not certain. The Cardno report references late-80's and mid-90's for additions and renovations. Packet Pg. 51 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: As already noted, it appears that rainwater draining off the street behind the grandstand may be directed into it. Exterior: Siding and trim is damaged from moisture and vandalism. Disconnected rain leaders exacerbate drainage issues. 2 Packet Pg. 52 6.1.c Building Interior: The "interior" side of the stands is worn. Interior spaces below the seating generally have water damage and evidence of rodents. 777 Synopsis of Observations: The building is in poor condition and it slated for demolition. The roof was not accessible at the time of the review. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. The building is slated for demolition. Commentary on Report by Cardno: This structure was not included in the Cardno report as it appears to have not been owned by the city at the time. 3 Packet Pg. 53 6.1.c $200,000 $180,000 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 ■ Civic Center Grandstand CIVIC CENTER GRANDSTAND 1 2 3 4 5 $187,680 $8,240 $0 $0 $0 rd Packet Pg. 54 6.1.c Fishing Pier, Olympic Beach Ranger Station and Restroom General Description: The fishing pier complex includes pier as well as a single building that contains both restrooms and the ranger station. The pier was initially constructed in 1974, and has just completed a renovation. It generally is parallel to the breakwater for the marina, just offshore of it. The restroom and ranger station building was constructed in 1976, and has a total area of about 920 SF. The restroom / Ranger Station building is located on the walkway to the pier. The restroom and ranger station do not have sprinkler systems. Site: The building site is a flat area paved in asphalt between the marina and a public beach. It is set within a larger complex of buildings, and does not have a dedicated site per se. Building History: The Ranger Station and Bathroom building have had no major renovations. The pier was extensively renovated in 2016, 1 Packet Pg. 55 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The site is largely paved. On the south side of the building is a small landscaped area, where a paver path is provided for access to the mechanical room. The pavers have heaved upward and now prevent the door from fully opening. This is either in the process of being repaired or has been partially disassembled. Planting are simple and in good condition. 1 Pier: The pier has been renovated to the degree that no older components are readily visible. The Pier is concrete, with metal and wood railings, a number of benches, wind breaks, and cleaning stations. All of these are in like -new condition. Lighting is provided. No defects were observed, although the railing does not appear to meet the building code requirements for a maximum 4" pass through. While those requirements may not apply to piers, this seems odd given the potential liability associated with a public pier, especially with horizontal railings that children love to climb. 1� z 2 Packet Pg. 56 6.1.c Building Exterior: The building is exposed jumbo -brick with wooden trim and areas of horizontal wood siding. It has both sloped roofs with asphalt shingles and an area of flat roofs, which were not visible. The shingles appear aged. Plywood type soffits are stained, possibly from moisture, and the wooden siding and trim will require paint and re -sealing very soon. Aluminum windows are older, and plastic glazing stops have shrunk, which may allow water into the frame. 3 Packet Pg. 57 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is generally worn. Stanchions for toilet partitions are rusting, and re -sealing the concrete floors may aid cleaning. The entry door to the ranger station is poorly adjusted and does not close well. While everything is currently working, finishes are simply wearing out or failing due to the proximity to salty marine air. V rd Packet Pg. 58 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building appears structurally sound but needs some maintenance to preserve it, as well as to improve its appearance. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Review condition of roof 2. Paint exterior siding and trim, especially trim boards above restroom clerestory windows that have no paint on them. 3. Replace interior finishes Comments on Report by Cardno: The Cardno report suggests that the ranger station and restrooms are not conditioned, but in fact there are electric unit heaters in the bathrooms and Kadett style wall heaters in the Ranger Station. FISHING PIER $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 x a $6,000 v $4,000 $2,000 $0 1 2 3 ■ Fishing Pier $10,320 $9,991 $2,971 5 4 5 $2,918 $5,628 Packet Pg. 59 6.1.c Fire Station 16 General Description: Fire Station 16 is the largest and the newest of the fire stations. Constructed in 2003, it is a 10,700 SF single -story building. Portions of the building are masonry, while other walls are framed with a cementitious horizontal siding. Sloped roofs have asphalt shingles. The building has a sprinkler system Site: The site is flat and compact. An asphalt drive loops to the back of the building creating a drive -through condition for the fire truck parking in the bays to face the street. Parking is at the side and rear of the building. The remainder of the site is landscaped in what appear to be native planting. Building History: There have been no remodels or major renovations to the building. Packet Pg. 60 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The building has an irrigation system, and the site is in good condition. Asphalt paving with concrete curbs and gutters is in good condition. r' la+ C I� fig.;: S r f` •'�r���.f 2 Packet Pg. 61 6.1.c Exterior: The exterior of the building is a mix of concrete block, brick, and horizontal siding. The most apparent problem with the exterior is failed sealants at joints. These include butt joints at siding, as well as control joints in the masonry portion of the building. In some locations, the ends of the horizontal siding are damaged at the butt joints, although the cause of this is not clear. The roof was not accessible, but appears to be in good condition. 1 3 Packet Pg. 62 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is generally in good condition. There is isolated damage at some door frames, failing sealant where urinals connect to the wall, and some ceiling tile stained from leaks. On examination, it appears that the leaks are connected to the improperly detailed addition of radio masts. Additionally, there is one interior door with a steel frame that has bad rust blisters on it, although why it is doing this is a mystery. It has apparently had a problem since the building was constructed. Synopsis of Observations: The building is in good condition with only minor needs for touch-up maintenance. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Clean weeps in vinyl windows where clogged with algae and moss. 2. Replace sealant at butt joints in siding, control joints in masonry Comments on Report by Cardno: The Cardno report is generally accurate, although it did not identify the need to replace sealant joints. 4 Packet Pg. 63 6.1.c FS 16 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 x Q $40,000 U $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 1 1 2 3 4 ■ FS 16 $24,970 $47,689 $1,591 $69,388 5 5 $30,107 Packet Pg. 64 6.1.c Fire Station 17 General Description: Fire Station 17 was constructed in 1999, and is 9,800 SF. It is located adjacent to the Public Safety complex and across the street from the Boys and Girls Club building. It is wood framed construction with horizontal wood siding, with a standing seam metal roof. A fenced equipment yard is located at the side of the building. The station is equipped with a sprinkler system. Site: The site is located on a corner, and has a gentle slope. This does not impact he building design, although the large concrete apron in front of the equipment bay doors slopes toward the building. Staff parking and a landscaped area is north of the building, where a small 9/11 memorial is also located. Building History: There have been no known remodels or major renovations to the building. Packet Pg. 65 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The building has an irrigation system, and the site is in good condition. Asphalt paving with concrete curbs and gutters is somewhat worn with areas of cracking. There is what appears to be a small rainwater detention area north of the building. The fence at patio needs maintenance. R - r` .. - .-..- - I r.i Packet Pg. 66 6.1.c Exterior: The building exterior is in generally good condition, although it is in need of repainting. The fenced yard on the south side of the building is in especially poor condition, where water intrusion has led to rot. Somewhat complicated details at the water table (a horizontal trim board) need to be sealed to prevent water intrusion. Adhesive is running out from under glazing stops in some windows, this should be investigated to determine what is causing it to occur. In some locations, nails for the roof sheathing appear to have missed the 2X4 tails they should be attaching to. 3 Packet Pg. 67 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is generally worn but not failing or damaged. There are some stained ceiling tiles, although roof leaks are reportedly fixed. Vinyl Composition Tiles are shrunken from overly harsh cleaners, and laminate countertops are worn, probably for similar reasons. Paint on metal doors is badly chipped in some areas. Some diffusers were quite stained, suggesting filter changes should be more frequent. 4 ■ Packet Pg. 68 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building appears structurally sound but needs some maintenance to preserve it, as well as to improve its appearance. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Repaint building, including renewing sealant Z. Replaced damaged wooden exterior 3. Repair insulation scrim in equipment bays, as noted by Cardno 4. Re -coat epoxy flooring in equipment bays, as noted by Cardno. 5. Verify adequacy of filter renewal schedule. Comments on Report by Cardno: The Cardno report is generally accurate, although it did not identify the need to replace sealant joints and paint, which is crucial to maintaining the building. FS 17 $250,000 $200,000 X $150,000 w a a v $100,000 $50,000 1 2 3 4 5 ■ FS 17 $39,935 $1,545 $225,547 $144,830 $27,575 5 Packet Pg. 69 6.1.c Fire Station 20 -- Esperance General Description: According to a plaque on its fagade, Fire Station 20 was initially constructed in 1956 for the Snohomish county Fire District. It was then reconstructed in 1992, and sold to the City of Edmonds in 1996. At 6.400 SF, it appears to be both the smallest and oldest of the fire stations. It is very residential in appearance, and is wood framed with a mix of horizontal and stucco siding. It is partially two stories, with high equipment bays occupying one end of the structure. It has a low-pitched roof with asphalt shingles. The building does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The site is mid -block in a residential area and has a gentle slope up toward the rear. The land climbs more steeply where the building is situated, such that the second floor opens directly out to grade behind the building. Building History: The scope of the 1992 reconstruction is not clear, whether it was repairs or if the building essentially dates to that time. There is no evidence of significant work since that period. 1 Packet Pg. 70 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The site has a large area of asphalt paving in front of it, which has some heaves from tree roots. There is almost no landscaped area. The area behind the building appears to have native vegetation. No drainage problems were observed. 2 Packet Pg. 71 6.1.c Exterior: The building exterior is in generally good condition, although it needs some maintenance. Paint is nearing the end of its life, and staining on the soffits suggests that there may be a moisture problem within them. Pipe penetrations through siding require sealing to prevent rodent entry. The roof is covered in needles and moss, and should be cleaned. It was difficult to assess its condition accurately with the amount of material on it, although there were no obvious flaws. The gutters are a "leaf guard" type, which in some cases does not function well with needles. The system should be reviewed periodically for clogging. 6 3 Packet Pg. 72 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is generally worn, with damage in some areas necessitating more immediate repair or replacement. This includes floors, walls finishes, and the like. There are many stained ceiling tiles, although the leaks themselves are apparently addressed. 4 41 Packet Pg. 73 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building appears structurally sound but needs some maintenance to preserve it, as well as to improve its appearance. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Check gutters for potential blockages 2. Clean moss from roof 3. Renew interior finishes Comments on Report by Cardno: The Cardno report is generally accurate, although it does not account for the generally worn finishes $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 x Q $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 1 ■ FS 20 $16,960 FS 20 M M h a 2 3 4 5 $12,772 $16,274 $94,248 $69,782 5 Packet Pg. 74 6.1.c ■ 1 e WAS ! l,AW Fleets Maintenance Facility General Description: The fleets maintenance facility is a pre -fabricated metal building of roughly 7,500 SF. It has a large volume, and has a number of offices and restrooms with storage mezzanines above. It is located on the same parcel as the Public Works O & M Center and several shelters, which are separately addressed. Construction on the site dates to 1995. The building has a sprinkler system, although the outbuildings and temporary shelters do not. Site: While the overall site is quite large and the northern edge is elevated, the area immediately around the shops is flat. There is a concrete apron outside the building, but the remainder of the site is paved with asphalt. Building History: There do not appear to have been any renovations to the structure. 1 Packet Pg. 75 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The parking area is aged but in good condition, with some areas of cracking in asphalt paving. r^=Y i.'•10 Exterior: The flashing at the base of the metal wall that covers the split face Concrete Masonry Unit base is not sloped to drain, which may lead to water problems. The neoprene gasket screws that attach the metal siding to the frame are loos in some locations due to thermal expansion and contraction. r 2 "'--�.u_-.me'"µ• r� lr�_�� Packet Pg. 76 6.1.c Building Interior: The building is typical pre -fabricated building finishes. In some areas the scrim on the inside of the insulation is cracked. Interior construction is generally good, although there is wire glass in relites, which is a dangerous material, and no insulation is provided on lavatory drains. l=L Synopsis of Observations: The building appears to be in generally good condition. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Verify that fasteners on exterior are properly tightened. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. 3 Packet Pg. 77 6.1.c Frances Anderson Center General Description: Frances Anderson Center was constructed as Edmonds Elementary school in 1928, with a single -story addition added in the 1950's and 1960's that surrounds almost all the building. The original building has two floors and a daylight basement. The total area of the complex is roughly 55,000SF. It has been used as a "Cultural and Leisure Center" since 1978. Classrooms are used by community organizations, such as a day care, a Montessori school and ballet classes. There are also pottery studios. A gym located at the northeast corner of the complex is available for community use, along with a weight room. Some rooms are used as offices for cultural organizations. The original construction is masonry finished with stucco, with a flat roof and large windows. The later additions are concrete block with a flat roof that has monitors or a saw -tooth roof type assembly to gather north light. Site: The site has a slope to the west, so that the playfield behind the building is elevated somewhat above it. There is a stage -like structure in the playfield / park area. The additions are primarily at the elevation of the daylight basement, although the gym and daycare area to the south are higher. No obvious site deficiencies were observed, although it should be noted that accessible entrances to the building are somewhat limited by stairways both inside and outside the doorways. 1 Packet Pg. 78 6.1.c Building History: Additions were added in 1948, 1952 and 1961, which almost entirely surround the original structure. When the library was constructed on the adjacent site to the west in 1982, minor decorative work was applied to nearby portions of the building and some improvements were made to exterior walking surfaces. The 1950/1960's additions have had seismic bracing added. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: 2 Packet Pg. 79 6.1.c Site: The site has multiple different materials in differing conditions. Asphalt surfaces east of the building are eroded and have multiple repairs. Narrow landscaped beds are found along the north and south sides of the building. These are generally in acceptable condition, although there is some damage to paving and retaining walls that should be monitored. Landscaped areas between the mid-century wings are in fair condition. Irrigation is provided. 3 Packet Pg. 80 6.1.c Building Exterior: The original portion of the building is finished in stucco and in good condition. Stucco is not an especially good material selection for the Northwest since it does not dry well during long, damp periods. Because of that maintaining its surface is very important. The gymnasium is sided in a material similar to HardiePanel. While it is a good material, the joints do not seem well detailed and water may get behind the panels. Missing corner covers should be replaced Vertical joints should be maintained. The siding material comes down to grade, which suggests that the framing behind may as well. It must be determined what material is behind the wall and whether it will be damaged by moisture, since that is a risk when there is little elevation above grade. The mid-century portion of the building shows the most need for concern on the exterior. It is un- insulated concrete block. There is extensive evidence of water damage in the block walls. The cause of this should be determined and it should be remedied. It may be a matter of a failed coating, but 4 Packet Pg. 81 6.1.c Glazing: The windows are recent fiberglass replacement units in good condition. Areas of glass -block are found on the mid-century additions. Additionally, there are some areas of wood framed windows on the mid- century additions. These windows are only located on the relatively protected northern fagade, and appear to be in fair condition. It � 5 Packet Pg. 82 6.1.c Roof: The upper roof of the building was not accessible at the time of the review. The roof on the mid-century portion of the building is a built-up roof, with a granular cap sheet. It was visible but not accessible. No problems were observed, although it should have drains cleaned, especially because the edge detail has very little height to prevent water from being driven under the metal copings. There are areas of staining or collapsing ceiling tiles, suggesting that there have been roof leaks. A more thorough review is recommended. 1.1 Packet Pg. 83 6.1.c Interior: Floors have a variety of tile and carpet finishes, as well as either concrete or possibly magnesite. In many instances the floors are worn or damaged by slab damage below. Note that here are areas of what appear to be asbestos tile, identified by its 9X9" dimension. This should be tested to confirm if it contains asbestos, and if it does a maintenance plan should be created. Asbestos tile can safely remain in place, but caution must be taken with buffing equipment, for example. Carpet is often worn and ear the end of its useful life. Walls: Generally in acceptable condition. Isolated areas of water damage in mid-century wing —see under exterior walls. 7 Packet Pg. 84 6.1.c Furnishings: Casework in classrooms is in fair to poor condition. N\ t Other: Sinks do not have insulation over drains per ADA requirements, or ADA fixtures. Kitchen exhaust fan in preschool area is not located near cooking equipment, and was not in use at the time of the review. It may not have been in use because staff have not been instructed to use it, and it does not seem connected to the cooking process because it and its switch are far from the stove. Wire glass is present in many lites. It can be a dangerous material when subject to human impact, so replacement with modern fire rated glass is suggested. There is evidence of water intrusion into the electrical room. } H Packet Pg. 85 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building appears to be in some need of maintenance and upgrades, particularly in the mid-century wings. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Repair flashings and covers on Hardie -panel type siding material on gym. 2. Repair water damage on mid-century walls 3. Re -apply elastomeric coating to masonry and stucco surfaces 4. Verify ADA requirements in bathrooms 5. Improve kitchen exhaust fan by providing hood and convenient controls. 6. Verify if floor materials contain asbestos and develop appropriate maintenance plan if they do Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. Because there was not access to the upper roof at the time of the review, Cardno's assessment of the roof's need for replacement must be accepted. FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 x $800,000 LU Q $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 - 1 2 3 4 ■ Frances Anderson Center $1,143,925 $303,593 $298,378 $98,892 0 5 $20,934 Packet Pg. 86 6.1.c Hickman Park Shelters General Description: Hickman park contains a picnic shelter as well as a sign kiosk and fences that screen portable restrooms. The shelter was constructed in 2008, and it is likely that the kiosk and fences are from the same time. The kiosk and shelter are similar in detailing; heavy timber construction on concrete bases, with standing seam metal roofs. The structure is about 1,600 SF. Site: The facilities are located on a city park, which is essentially flat. No adverse site conditions were observed. Building History: There does not appear to be any renovations to the structures. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of each facility: Packet Pg. 87 6.1.c Shelter: The shelter has heavy timber post and beam construction set on a concrete base that is roughly twice the size of the shelter. At the rear of the shelter is a concrete counter provided with a sink and convenience electrical outlets. Several permanently affixed tables are on the concrete base, both under the shelter and in the open. The shelter has a standing seam metal roof. The concrete counter should be sealed to prevent stains, and the faucet is loose. T • yit'� � - �Y 2 Packet Pg. 88 6.1.c Kiosk: The kiosk appears in good condition. It is very simple and has no services. Restroom Facility Fence: The fence is in good condition, although it is important that the stain be maintained on it, especially as it appears damaged from either bills being posted or impacts. Synopsis of Observations: The facilities appear to be in good condition. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Replace cover on electrical outlet in shelter 2. Tighten loose faucet at shelter sink. 3. Seal concrete countertop. 4. Shelter roof and gutters should be cleaned of tree needles. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. 3 Packet Pg. 89 6.1.c _ a bw • .ram _-._ �..- `—+�• �..'_� : � .. _ � �-��..�.- �- �r ``' .�-.. y.r..,•.r+•.--'—•--r^rw-r--r-+'jai �' -- � - Log Cabin General Description: The log cabin is home to the tourist bureau. It is a single room, with a small side -chamber with a loft over it. The year of construction is listed as 1900, 1930 or 1931 in different sources, although the 1930s seems most likely. It was moved to the site in 1975. Construction of the roughly 400 SF building is logs with a timber roof with a shake surface. It has a concrete and stone foundation that also supports a brick chimney. Site: The small site is entirely landscaped except for the building site —no parking or other outdoor features are provided. Landscaping is in very good condition. Building History: A major renovation, including the addition of the concrete foundation, occurred circa 2000 1 Packet Pg. 90 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Following is a description of each facility: Site: The site is heavily landscaped and in very good condition. f Building Exterior: Exterior is in good condition. Repairs to previous rot at ends of logs is evident. 2 Packet Pg. 91 6.1.c Glazing: Single galzed wood windows are poor performers but historic. Interior: The interior is simple and in good condition. The stairs to the loft are not sound or provided with current railings, but are historic and not open to the public. Synopsis of Observations: The building appears to be in good condition. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. 3 Packet Pg. 92 6.1.c $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 ■ Historic Log Cabin HISTORIC LOG CABIN 1 2 3 $7,903 $0 $888 rd 4 5 $546 $1,361 Packet Pg. 93 6.1.c Edmonds Historical Museum General Description: The Edmonds Historical Museum was initially constructed as a Carnegie Library in 1911. It contains 3,910 SF on two floors, the lower of which housed the city office, jail, and city council chambers until 1962. It was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1973. It is a two-story building with the main floor at level two. The lower floor is almost entirely above grade, and the upper floor is accessed by a steep stairway. It is constructed of brick above parge coated concrete, with quoins of buff -colored contrasting brick accenting the brick story. It has a low-pitched hip roof with a standing seam metal surface around a flat roofed area with a large skylight. The floor and roof structures are of wood construction. The building does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The small site has landscaped areas as well as a paved plaza. Parking for two cars is provided off the alley south of the building. Building History: The building was most recently renovated in 2014, when previous remodels were removed and the building returned to its original appearance. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: 1 Packet Pg. 94 6.1.c Site: The site area is very limited. There are small areas of landscaping, plaza, and parking. The parking area paving is older but functional. Building Exterior: The building exterior is in very good condition. There is some surface cracking in the parge coat, but not significant. The only area where exterior wall problems are apparent is within the boiler room, where there is extensive water damage. That room is partially below grade, but the damage is high on the wall so the source may be above —possibly a window issue. The steps to the main entry are very steep and do not meet current code, but are historic. An accessible entrance is provided. Windows are recent, in an appropriate style. 2 Packet Pg. 95 6.1.c Interior: The two floors of the building are in very different condition. The upper floor has been recently restored and is also the portion of the building intended for public use. The lower floor of the building contains displays, storage, and the boiler room. It does not appear to have had as extensive restoration work. The boiler room has wate damage high on the walls, aothough the source couldn't be determined. This should be observed to determine the cause so it can be repaired. Lighting is conventional incandescent fixtures. 3 i Packet Pg. 96 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building is in good condition, although the source of water damage in the boiler room should be identified. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Identify and address moisture in boiler room. 2. Change incandescent lighting to LED Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. HISTORICAL MUSEUM $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 x $8,000 LU u $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 ■ Historical Museum $12,121 $13,089 $6,100 $0 $4,621 4 Packet Pg. 97 Library and Plaza Room General Description: Located immediately west of the Francis Anderson Center, the Library and associated Plaza Room was constructed in 1982. The Library is a single level, with the Plaza Room located on top of it with access to rooftop terraces. The Plaza Room is a meeting or function space available for community use. Together they total 19,520 SF. The rooftop terraces are at the same elevation as the Francis Anderson Center, and the two are connected by a landscaped sculpture garden. The library appears to have a concrete frame with masonry and framed walls with a stucco finish. The jumbo brick has integral color but has been painted, either to conceal graffiti or add some waterproofing. It has extensive roof decks with many jumbo brick planters and landscape walls. Site: The site slopes down toward the west, such that parking is tucked underneath the library. Surface parking continues to the west, while a landscaped courtyard with stair towers provides exterior access to the Plaza Room and yards adjacent to the community center. Building History: Records suggest many minor upgrades, although no major renovations. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: Packet Pg. 98 6.1.c Site: Landscaping is in good condition. Site features such as paving are showing some settlement, which may be a tripping hazard, as well as damage to curbs. It is reported that the building has leaks due to the extensive rooftop plantings, and there are extensive areas of brick with moisture damage. At upper right is a sprinkler control box that was not properly shut off, as discovered flooded the morning of the review. The condition of planting bed liners and under paver / topping slab membranes should be checked, which is a very expensive proposition because waterproofing green roofs is difficult to do reliably and may require removal of all of the planting and soil. 2 FJ Packet Pg. 99 6.1.c Building Exterior: Almost all observed problems with the building exterior stem from moisture intrusion. Jumbo brock is badly damaged, and water has also run into soffit assemblies above the parking area and is causing the soffit to collapse in one area. The causes of water intrusion must be remedied and damaged materials repaired. nor — •�� = �t'� .�+' w.Yti_ ... * .�i' 3 Packet Pg. 100 6.1.c Roof: The roof has several assemblies, pavers, landscape, and an asphaltic built -up -roof over the plaza room. Copings are metal, even where they are subject to skateboard and other human damage at the plaza level. The detailing of the copings is not the best —standing seams are better performers than the current lap joints between sections. Stucco siding is also a fairly porous material if not properly coated and may allow moisture in. There were few observed defects in the planting areas, however that is exactly the problem —diagnosing leaks is almost impossible with the plantings in place. 4 U bbZ11-_I"qq Packet Pg. 101 6.1.c Interior: Floors: Floor materials include ceramic tile, exposed aggregate concrete, and carpet. All are in good condition, although some areas of the ceramic tile show poor repairs. �as ``=n i•�. . v _Rlaiti. w1+•+ • a •r� y �. �i • _ � i .ia .+w i i�rirei :%Z • i r Ceilings: There is widespread, minor damage to acoustic ceiling tiles from leaks. There are also areas of gypsum wallboard soffit. 5 Packet Pg. 102 6.1.c Other: Wood trim near windows has been damaged by water, either from leaks or condensation. There are several failed insulated glazing units with condensation inside the glass panes. Wire glass is in door liter. This is a dangerous material if pushed against, and can now be replaced with modern, safer fire rated glass. Single glazing at corners leaks at butt joint. This single glazing only occurs at corner windows. 11 Packet Pg. 103 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building needs repairs on the exterior to prevent water damage. Materials already damaged by water should be repaired. This will be an expensive and complicated process. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Remedy any leaks in planting beds and on accessible roof surfaces. 2. Repair damaged masonry and apply water resistant sealer if appropriate. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. LIBRARY $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 x $200,000 a U $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 0 Library $322,362 $105,175 $150,902 $53,325 $45,038 7 Packet Pg. 104 6.1.c Meadowdale Community Clubhouse General Description: The Meadowdale Clubhouse is an event space that can be rented by community members. It has a partial basement that is used by a day care. It is located across the street from Meadowdale Park and elementary and middle schools, although they are located in the City of Lynnwood. There is a small play area adjacent to the building although it does not have an obvious connection to the to the park across the street. The 3,950 SF Building was constructed in 1965. The building is constructed much as a single- family home of the period would be, and it generally looks like one as well. Site: The site is relatively flat on its Eastern edge, but along the west and south sides the land drops off abruptly. The building is situated at the top of the slope, such that the slope allows for a daylight basement facing south and west. An asphalt parking lot is located East of the building, with a road along the south side that provides vehicular access to the daylight basement. Building History: There does not appear to be any renovations to the structures. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of each facility: Site: Packet Pg. 105 Al . . . . . . . . ...... Aq1. 4 4j. 6.1.c Building Exterior: The exterior is a mix of concrete block and shake siding, with board and batten at the exposed walls of the basement. The building has a sloped roof with asphalt shingles. All siding materials in in acceptable condition, although some maintenance, sealing and painting is required. A flashing at the base of the board and batten is pitched to direct water back into the wall rather than out, this must be corrected. The roof appears to be in good condition, as are the gutters. Flashing at the base of the chimney is very loose and should be corrected. 1. Glazing: i There is a mix of fixed and operable windows. Insulted glazing units are used in older windows. 3 r C Packet Pg. 107 6.1.c Interior: Floors are primarily vinyl tile. They are worn and cracked to the point where keeping them clean appears to be difficult. They should be tested for asbestos prior to any work. There may also be failure in the substrate, so additional prep work may be required. Interior surfaces and features are generally worn. The kitchen is functional, but the difficulty maintaining cleanliness with the large gaps in the floor tile is significant. W�- -""qq 4 Packet Pg. 108 6.1.c Doors: Some exterior doors are damaged and worn. r Other: Sinks do not allow wheelchair approach. Synopsis of Observations: The building appears to be in some need up maintenance and upgrades, especially in the kitchen and bathrooms. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Replace floor surfaces 2. Repair exterior doors 3. Repaint building, include replacing sealants 4. Repair chimney flashing 5. Remodel kitchen and bathroom facilities to better address current needs and codes. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate, although the report does not appear to address the condition of the kitchen and restrooms. Additionally, it identifies the roof as at the end of its service life, so it is possible that the roof was replaced between the creation of that report and this review. 5 Packet Pg. 109 6.1.c MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 x Q $15,000 U $10,000 $5,000 $0 1 1 2 ■ Meadowdale Club House $26,083 $13,426 1.1 m 0 6L 3 4 5 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 Packet Pg. 110 6.1.c Dayton Street Plaza Arts Buildings — "Old Public Works" General Description: The Dayton Street Plaza Building was constructed circa 1965 for the City Public Works Department. The building is a pre -fabricated steel ("Butler") building with small areas of brick veneer. The 14,100 SF Building now houses community arts organization. It is primarily a single level with some mezzanine spaces and a small 2-story portion. Sections of the building have been renovated, although some areas are in original, and fairly poor, condition. Areas of the building appear to be set aside for fleet maintenance uses, although it is not clear how much of that is occurring. The building does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The building occupies roughly half of the site, which slopes gently to the west and south. Along the eastern edge of the site, the land rises abruptly to the neighboring properties, and is cut in a way that may cause erosion. At the north end of the building is a small, landscaped public plaza. Building History: Some areas of the building have recent renovation work although the date is uncertain. Several roof leaks have recently been repaired. 1 Packet Pg. 111 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The plaza area at the north is very recent, with good hardscapes and landscapes. There are almost no plantings in other areas, and the asphalt paving areas are worn and have cracking. The slope behind the building appears to be steep enough to require a retaining wall, and it should be observed for erosion or slippage. 2 Packet Pg. 112 6.1.c Exterior: The building exterior is primarily metal panel, with some areas of brick and aluminum storefront. The storefront is single glazed, as are the few aluminum windows found along the east side of the building. The southern portion of the building is old vehicle bays, and is taller. It has no windows, but overhead doors with lites in some panels. At the extreme south end of the building is an area separated by a fence that contains more, active vehicle bays and a two-story portion with more aluminum windows. The area beyond the fence is not used by arts organizations and does not appear to have been updated. It also has damage from vehicle impacts. The metal panel roof is not accessible. 3 Packet Pg. 113 6.1.c Building Interior: In some areas, the building finishes are recent, although the building generally is worn, especially in the two-story southern portion. Much of the building has few finishes because it originally was a shop. The finishes are often simple, such as plastic scrim holding insulation back. Note collapsing ceiling tiles, and broken fiberglass sheeting (scrim) materials. 4 Packet Pg. 114 6.1.c The southern portion of building appears underutilized and is in fairly poor condition. While most of the damage is superficial, some work is required to make the building fully functional, such as repairing dented and twisted metal components and damaged insulation. The wooden stairs are very worn, and single glazed windows, including jalousies (glass louvers) are very poor energy performers. Outbuilding: To the southwest is an open shelter with gated bays. It was not accessible, but appears to be in similar condition to the less restored portions of the main building. Synopsis of Observations: 5 Packet Pg. 115 6.1.c The building appears to be structurally sound. Finishes and applied materials such as insulation are worn in some areas, however. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Stabilize slope behind building 2. Replace single pane windows if building is to be routinely heated 3. Repair insulation where damaged 4. Minor repairs through out Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate. Plumbing fixtures in the southern portion of the building are not functional. There is also a general need for restoration of finishes and insulation if the building is to be used for purposes other than storage. OLD PUBLIC WORKS $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 X a $60,000 v $40,000 $20,000 3 $0 1 2 ■ Old Public Works $55,635 $107,743 0 ■ 3 4 5 $24,308 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 116 6.1.c Parks Maintenance Building General Description: The City Park Maintenance Building is a single -story wood framed building constructed in 1971. It is 5,500 SF, and has several small outbuildings. Construction is of wood framing, with a sloped roof. The main entrance is along the west side where offices and a break room are located, on the east side is a large shop. A boiler room is accessed from the exterior on the east side. There is also a large, free standing dust collector for the wood shop equipment located to the east. The building does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The site is a fenced of portion of City Park. A paved apron surrounds most of the building, with storage bins for gravel and mulch along the east side of the building, parking to the west, and loading at the north. Greenhouses are located to the south. Building History: There have been no remodels or major renovations to the building. Packet Pg. 117 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The site has a gentle slope up toward the east, such that the east wall of the building is at or below grade in areas. The area is generally paved with asphalt, which is in poor condition. 2 Packet Pg. 118 6.1.c Exterior: The exterior of the building is a plywood material with battens and flashings. Windows are single glazed aluminum sliders, which lose a tremendous amount of heat. The building has a sloped roof with asphalt shingles with significant moss build-up on it. Packet Pg. 119 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is generally worn and pre -dates modern safety and accessibility codes. Bathrooms are not accessible, and there are no safety railings in the boiler room. Finishes are generally worn. "M Synopsis of Observations: The building should probably be reviewed for significant updates or replacement. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Building is not accessible 2. Windows require replacement 3. Finishes are worn and cannot be kept clean 4. Roof appears near end of service life Comments on Report by Cardno: Cardno report is not as critical of overall building condition as this reviewer feels accurate. 4 Packet Pg. 120 6.1.c Outbuilding —City Parks Greenhouse: The greenhouses are actually several buildings, both framed with corrugated fiberglass siding and what appear to be pre -fabricated frames with plastic sheeting over them. The buildings are simple and of varying condition. All of them have lighting, ventilation and water provided. gF.'' Synopsis of Observations: The greenhouses range in condition; the pre -fabricated plastic ones are in good condition, while the framed ones have some damage. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Monitor condition of framing exposed by plastic sheeting Comments on Report by Cardno: Cardno report is not as critical of overall building condition as this reviewer feels accurate. The storage shed and the chemical shed were not independently reviewed. The storage shed is not of a scale where it was expected to be included, and the chemical shed is a pre -fabricated container, not a building. 5 Packet Pg. 121 6.1.c PARKS MAINT. BUILDING $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 x $80,000 LU u $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 1 ■ Parks Maint. Building $130,631 2 3 4 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 1.1 5 $5,177 Packet Pg. 122 6.1.c Public Safety Complex —Police, Courts, City Council Chambers General Description: The Public Safety Complex appears to be a wood and metal framed building with wood siding, areas of stucco, and a sloped standing seam metal roof. It is adjacent to Fire Station 17, and appears to have been built at the same time, since much of the detailing is similar. The primary entrance is on the upper level, where building is split by an entrance lobby. The two-story police facility is on one side, and the single level Courts and City Council Chamber on the other. The building was constructed in 1999, and is roughly 31,000 SF. Site: The complex, together with the site of Fire Station 17, occupies much of a city block. The site slopes gently down toward the west, where asphalt parking lots and a memorial garden are located. The building is set into the hill, with the lower story of the police station exposed, and a ceremonial stair up to the entrance lobby on the other side. No negative aspects were noted on the site. Building History: No major renovations are known. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: Packet Pg. 123 6.1.c Site: The site is large, with a ceremonial path leading to the main entrance that is joined by a large stair up from the lower parking area. A memorial garden lies south of the path. The lower floor of the police precinct is against the higher street, but has access to daylight via a landscaped well between the building and the street. All site components appear in good condition, although drains in the light well must be maintained regularly. 2 Packet Pg. 124 6.1.c Building Exterior: The building exterior has two distinct appearances. The simpler police precinct side as horizontal wooden siding with decorative trim bands and a standing seam metal roof. The more monumental Council Chambers side has stucco siding. Between them is the lobby, clad in a relatively transparent curtain wall. The wood siding is has complex detailing, and needs paint and sealant to maintain good condition. The exterior is in generally good condition but will need paint and sealing soon. 14, L7 3 MA Packet Pg. 125 6.1.c Roof: Staff on -site indicated there have been leak problems at the transition from roof to wall at the second floor, and numerous attempts to repair. This is apparently due to a poor detail. Discharging rain leaders onto metal roofs can lead to very quick water flow down the roof, which then overshoots the gutters. Ending roofs against walls is often a problematic detail. Overall, the roof appears to be in good condition although it does not have good detailing. The upper roof, reportedly a single ply membrane, was not accessible at the time of the review. PTI_'1 � Vaal 4 Packet Pg. 126 6.1.c Interior: There are many flooring types. Whle most of the building is carpeted, there is also VCT (vinyl composition tile) , polished concrete, Terrazzo in the entry lobby and ceramic tile in restrooms. In some areas carpet is worn or VCT shrunken from overly -aggreesicve cleaning material, but floors are generally in good condition. 5 Packet Pg. 127 6.1.c Ceilings: There is widespread, minor damage to acoustic ceiling tiles from accessing mechanical equipment above. There are also many stained tiles, from that same mechanical system leaking. Other: The remainder of building surfaces (walls, etc.) and casework are in good condition. There is extensive use of wire glass, which is not safe when subject to human impact and can now be replaced with superior fire -rated products, which is recommended. I- . _- __ ---- ___ _ IV 11 Packet Pg. 128 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building needs minor repairs on the exterior to prevent water damage. Interior surfaces, especially acoustic ceilings, are in worn condition but should not be replaced until mechanical unit leaks are remedied. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Re -seal joints and repaint. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate, although the building does not appear concrete to this reviewer. PUBLIC SAFETY $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 x Q $150,000 v $100,000 $50,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 ■ Public Safety $97,887 $43,081 $222,678 $264,853 $280,742 7 Packet Pg. 129 6.1.c Public Works Operations and Maintenance Center General Description: The Engineering Building is located at the site as the Fleets Maintenance Facility, and appears to have been constructed at the same time, in 1995. It is a two-story pre -fabricated metal building of 20,500 SF. The building is equipped with a sprinkler system. Site: The site is quite large. The building is located at the northern edge of it, where the land slopes down steeply such that the main entrance to the building is on the second floor, accessed by a bridge. The lower floor of the building opens onto the flat, paved equipment yards behind the building. The back of the building is largely 2-story high equipment bays with mezzanines. Building History: There have been no remodels or major renovations to the building. Packet Pg. 130 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Site: The site is generally paved in asphalt, which is covered under the "Fleet Maintenance" Building report. There is a small storm water detention pond behind the building. The slope between the building and street is landscaped. No problems were observed. IA Exterior: The metal exterior appears to be in good condition. There is minor damage to rain leaders and the like A good number of windows have failed glazing units, which should be replaced. 2 Packet Pg. 131 6.1.c Building Interior: The building interior is in generally good condition, although carpets are somewhat worn. Wire glass is present in many liter, which may be a safety concern. f-k- Uh Synopsis of Observations: The building is in good condition, with minor maintenance needs. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Replace failed insulating glazing units in windows. 2. Replace worn carpets 3. Minor repairs to rain leaders. Comments on Report by Cardno: Cardno recommends replacing epoxy floors. While they are worn, this is not critical. 3 Packet Pg. 132 6.1.c PUBLIC WORKS O&M $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 x Q $300,000 U $200,000 $100,000 $0 - 1 ■ Public Works O&M $37,700 2 3 $526,570 $218,643 rd 4 5 $80,315 $79,348 Packet Pg. 133 Edmonds Senior Center General Description: The Edmonds Senior Center was initially constructed in 1935, and purchased by the city in 1973. In 1980 a substantial amount of work was undertaken on the building. The 28,000 SF building has a two-story portion, although most of the building is a single level. The two-story portion is concrete block with applied timber detailing, while the single -story portion appears to be wood framed with flush horizontal siding. The building has a flat roof and no overhangs. Site: The 2.6-acre site looks out on to the beach, being located very near the ferry terminal. A concrete seawall separates the site from the beach. The building is set back from the seawall by a lawn, and surface parking lots are located on the land side of the building. Apparently, the sand is not stable, and despite the building being constructed on piles there is a significant amount of damage from settlement. No other site defects were observed. Building History: As noted earlier, a major project was undertaken in 1980 when a portion connecting the two-story wing to another building was constructed. Presumably renovations to the existing buildings occurred at that time as well. It appears that no major projects have been undertaken since. 1 Packet Pg. 134 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: Site: The site is in generally good repair, although the asphalt parking lot is worn and has large cracks. These cracks have telescoped through extruded curbs, suggesting actual soil settlement. z Packet Pg. 135 6.1.c Building Exterior: The building exterior is in poor condition. Without roof overhangs, the walls are fully exposed to water. Moisture has driven into the concrete block and is pushing the paint off, and the wooden walls are badly rotted. The wall siding assembly is a poor one for water, because it provides no edges to cause water to drip from, and instead water is sucked into the joints through capillary action. Doors have rust and damage, and windows have failed insulated glazing units. 3 Packet Pg. 136 6.1.c Interior: The building interior has been damaged by settlement, roof leaks, and the passage of time. Floors are often damaged, and there is a low level of deferred maintenance through out. -- 4 Packet Pg. 137 6.1.c Ceilings and Roof: There have been extensive leaks that have been repaired, but many badly stained acoustic ceiling tiles remain. 5 Packet Pg. 138 6.1.c Synopsis of Observations: The building needs significant improvements to the interior and exterior. Replacement seems a realistic choice. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Roof is leaking 2. Many ceiling tiles are stained. 3. Siding is failing 4. Floor slab at first floor has settled, causing damage to VCT flooring 5. Window insulated glazing units have failed, and stops that hold those units in are damaged 6. High level of overall wear is apparent Commentary on Report by Cardno: This building is not included in the Cardno report. $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 x $400,000 LU a v $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 1 ■ Senior Center $609,457 SENIOR CENTER 2 $79,477 0 3 $63,536 4 $75,543 5 $52,524 Packet Pg. 139 6.1.c Wade James Theater General Description: The Wade James Theater is home to the Driftwood Players. The 5,339 SF Building was constructed in 1968. It is a single level, with an entry lobby with concessions and restrooms leading to a theater space Behind the theater space is dressing rooms and a scene shop. It is generally a single story, although there is a small loft for costume and set storage. The building is wood framed, with wood siding and an asphalt shingle roof. The building does not have a sprinkler system. Site: The 2.2-acre site is mostly wooded, with an asphalt parking lot to the west of the Theater. The site behind the theater rises sharply, and appears to drain into the theater site. It is stated that "there is a stream under the building', and while no moisture was observed, it does smell musty. The course of Shell Creek is very nearby. There is surface storage behind the building. Building History: New roof, gutters and fascia were provided in 2013. An Alder tree fell through the roof in 2015, necessitating repairs to the roof and fascia. There have certainly been other repairs and upgrades, but a listing of scope and when was not available. Packet Pg. 140 6.1.c Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: Site: The site is along a road running up the center of a swale, with the building and parking areas located on the relatively flat bottom of the swale and the land rising behind them. The area appears damp, and Alders frequently indicate wet soils. The area immediately behind and East of the building are wooded. The parking lot is asphalt with simple landscaping. The asphalt is in fair to poor condition, and the planting beds are overgrown. One of the catch basins is sunken and surrounded by damaged asphalt. 2 Packet Pg. 141 6.1.c Building Exterior: The building is sheathed in what appear to be cedar shingles. It has a sloped roof with multiple pitches, all sheathed with asphalt shingles. There are some areas of damage to fascias and siding, caused both by settlement and weather. This is particularly noticeable at the east side of the building shown in the middle left image. 3 Packet Pg. 142 6.1.c Interior: The building interior condition is good at the entry lobby, but in fair to poor condition in non-public spaces. There are holes in the wall of one of the bathrooms near the dressing rooms. l t lAd 4 Packet Pg. 143 6.1.c Other: Weather-stripping at doors does not provide seal. Synopsis of Observations: The building needs minor repairs on the exterior to prevent water damage. Non-public spaces are worn and need some updating. Building generally seems damp. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Maintain exterior of building, including structural stabilization if needed for area on east side where gable end is cracked, and minor repairs to siding materials where rotted due to contact with cement. 2. Improve airflow or dehumidification to prevent moisture related problems on interior. Commentary on Report by Cardno: This building is not included in the Cardno report. 5 Packet Pg. 144 6.1.c $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 ■ Wade James Theater WADE JAMES THEATER M M 1 2 3 $21,697 $18,600 $99,077 1.1 4 5 $43,880 $115,734 Packet Pg. 145 6.1.c .— ._. .. .. .. ..... ...n..aeti.Y.. +Y+•••••••....rn...Yua.Yt�'f ..r......aa_n.aaR....fn.�.V.nl.[. � •r .�' «...a. s. .a .Yff.f...w riirwYMIw41'i.:.'•.f 1la.'d�4w sw].la _. r-a. •aa OW -.� .•air -- .�_ � � _ - Yost Pool General Description: The Yost Pool building was constructed in the early 1970's. It is on two levels, entered from the upper, On that upper level is a cashier's booth, as well as open areas suitable for parties, waiting, or viewing. Downstairs are locker rooms, an office for lifeguards, and a large mechanical room to support the pool The upper level is wood framed, while the lower is concrete block. The roof appears to be a concrete tile. The pool deck, the pool itself and the hot tub are not included in this review. Site: The building is set into a slope, with parking somewhat above the upper level, with the pool at the elevation of the locker rooms on the lower floor. The parking lot surface appeared worn but serviceable. No significant site problems were observed, although the building was not designed to be handicapped accessible. Building History: No major renovations are known. Observed Conditions: Following is a description of the building by area: Packet Pg. 146 6.1.c Site: The site is in generally good repair, although it is showing its age. The one item of note is the stair along the south side of the building, that while not public, it may be an attractive nuisance. It is very uneven and may present a tripping hazard to any tempted to see where it goes. � �-"-v 2 Packet Pg. 147 6.1.c Building Exterior: The building exterior is simple and in generally good repair. There is a consistent level of minor repair required, fading paint and rust on doors, aged sealant, and minor impact damage to screens and rain leaders. Z 3 --------------- Packet Pg. 148 6.1.c Interior: Not surprisingly, the interior has a consistent level of damage to surfaces such as rust on metal, delamination on gypsum wall board, and other materials —all attributable to moisture. It is a harsh environment and it shows. Note that the building is not designed to be accessible, and no insulation is provided on lavatory drains. Drinking fountains are not accessible, and bubblers have been rotated. The reviewer rotated one back the correct direction and a lifeguard promptly came over and rotated it out of designed alignment again to allow filling of water bottles. This may surprise someone using it for a drink. r� a 4 Packet Pg. 149 6.1.c Other: Note that wire glass is found in lites, where it poses a threat to those who may hit the glass. This is particularly an issue with the life guard office located at the base of the stairs. The roof appears to be a concrete tile. It has some moss and algae, and may require cleaning and sealing. Synopsis of Observations: The building appears structurally sound and functional, but has consistent wear and moisture related damage to finishes. Observed maintenance needs are limited, but include: 1. Clean and seal roof 2. Attempt to reduce humidity to address damage to finishes. Commentary on Report by Cardno: The information contained in the Cardno report seems generally accurate, although the roof material appears to be mis-identified. 5 Packet Pg. 150 6.1.c YOST POOL HOUSE $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 x $40,000 LU u $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 _ 1 2 3 4 5 ■ Yost Pool House $4,500 $65,570 $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 1.1 Packet Pg. 151 6.1.c _ 0 m 3 a� z 4- 0 m _ Cu ai _ _ _ a� _ _ R _ LL 0 m r _ 0 N m r L 0 Q U _ Cu _ r _ .C� C y Q R LL M r-+ _ d E t V R a f il1Stry PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL Packet Pg. 152 6.1.c PROJECT: City of Edmonds DATE: 9/14/2017 Capex NPV Financial Data Inflation Rate (Annual) 3.00% Discount Rate 3.00 % Boys and Girls Club $487,652 $36 151 $38 034 $27 733 $37 453 $32 077 $15 101 0 0 0 69 586 $19 349 7,118 $21 749 $25 674 $0 Cerra t Buildin 129 289 455 1 954 2 094 8 414 3 377 818 0 $54 567 0 652 1,008 0 2 651 $1,542 756 Ci Hall 3 427 997 171 463 $479,064 $323,246 0 $70 949 $108,628 $67 132 0 $520,853 $228,662 $87 279 $7,336 $208,425 $0 $158,124 Civic Center Grandstand 410 24060 187,680 8,240 0 0 0 $10 132 0 0 0 0 $34 619 0 7 870 $0 0 FishingPier 160 8 $10 320 9 991 $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 0 615 $4,966 0 0 346 $5,019 $2,497 0 Frances Anderson Center $5,005,172 $303,593 $298,378 $98 892 $20 934 $113,029 $68 957 $16 648 $10 768 0 $641,720 $318,235 $47,050 $6,902 $87 352 FS 16 1 153 411 $24 970 $47 689 1 591 $69 388 $30 107 $31 631 $33 538 169 102 0 $19 572 $25 198 0 35 701 $26 191 $279 413 FS 17 1 518 525 $39 935 1 545 225 547 144 830 $27 575 122 245 $35 439 $27 119 0 2,088 $62 633 260,970 8 383 $0 0 FS 20 709 560 12,750 $16 960 $12 772 $16 274 $94 248 $69 782 $23 765 $12 227 $60 940 $21 358 $12 526 0 135,516 $22 356 $24 231 9 076 Historic LogCabin 7 903 0 888 546 $1,361 6 469 444 480 872 0 0 0 318 $734 $1,829 Historical Museum $241,665 $12 121 $13 089 $6,100 0 $4,621 $10 199 $66 867 $13 005 0 0 0 $23 715 $14 188 $0 $4 436 Libre 2 154 920 322 362 105 175 150 902 $53 325 $45 038 0 246 482 1 599 6 182 79 852 3,024 $90 518 136 371 $7,166 0 Meadowdale Club House $258,752 $26,083 $13,426 $6,365 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 0 $3,644 $8,209 $20,634 $18,596 $38,759 $3,379 $10,731 $89,621 Old Public Works $804,590 $55,635 $107,743 $24,308 0 0 $24,519 $35,356 0 0 $80,207 $284,574 $18,633 $44,730 $8,224 0 Parks Maint. Building 543 229 $130,631 $15,789 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 597 922 0 $7,974 $1,636 $22,357 $17,004 $6,286 0 Public Safety $3,247,863 $18,564 $7,967 $445,276 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $68,346 $85,618 0 3 131 0 $418,554 $26,468 $1,469 $86,579 Public Works O&M $3,042,116 $37,700 526 570 $218,643 $80,315 79 348 43 821 0 $265,284 950 $58,454 $34,762 0 $150,418 $109,993 0 Senior Center $2,483,805 609 457 79 477 63 536 75 543 52 524 24 396 25 929 0 37 322 0 192 316 9,710 24 003 0 0 Wade James Theater 737 060 21 697 18 600 99 077 43 880 115 734 $21,872 3 821 17 403 0 0 15 636 4,430 189 213 30 016 0 Yost Pool House 776 164 4 500 65 570 26 128 8 409 19 127 1.9%285 30 389 18 099 39 437 0 9 128 52 749 9,603 60 407 31 206 13 157 City Total $2,878,512 $1,856,289 $1,979,377 $790,.63 $ $1, 173,516 $683,235 1 $757,082 1 $611,478 $592,465 1 $1,475,099 $1,365,799 1 $1,025,705 1 $292,862 1 $730,342 -Pllal renewal nYV $27,327,621 Buildin. Nam. Sfi 11 1. 19 2D 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2R 29 3D Boys and Girls Club $26,704 $0 $51,238 $0 $77,025 $22,908 $17,857 $21,347 1 $78,132 $8,362 $1,047 $0 $0 1 $0 $87,975 Cemetery Building $8,569 $3,045 $0 $2,043 $4,384 $0 $465 $2,690 $13,727 $926 $3,576 $0 $94,760 $0 $0 City Hall $0 $22,466 $42,239 $318,270 $18,412 $422,513 $95,082 $280,744 $0 $211,260 $15,023 $165,338 $11,773 $765,312 $401,205 Civic Center Grandstand $13,243 $0 $0 $0 $4,384 $279,983 $0 $0 $0 $11,221 $6,281 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fishing Pier $10,127 $0 $0 $161,850 $6,050 $0 $1,339 $5,365 $0 $11,628 $3,141 $0 $0 $8,740 $0 Frances Anderson Center $219,557 $264,937 $20,661 $161,220 $195,078 $896,012 $189,285 $110,655 $0 $674,481 $539,148 $384,952 $49,282 $228,793 $296,809 FS 16 $143,411 $27,902 $36,933 $0 $46,906 $45,153 $180,808 $0 $86,344 $51,115 $33,605 $37,498 $81,999 $0 $273,833 FS 17 $210,326 $0 $2,479 $313,418 $73,893 $65,119 $47,400 $0 $0 $62,773 $307,890 $0 $0 $0 $248,500 FS 20 $0 $18,486 $2,479 $10,896 $28,933 $0 $96,252 $57,272 $195,681 $7,806 1 $65,954 $0 $7,775 $19,768 1 $22,623 Historic Log Cabin $2,057 1 $0 $0 1 $1,172 $0 $1,512 1 $0 $535 $1,758 $3,668 $14,301 $0 $0 $1,575 $0 Historical Museum $15,229 $0 $11,956 $9,789 $0 $70,159 $23,640 $0 $17,363 $4,769 $8,187 $9,543 $16,068 $0 $0 Library $0 $92,271 $104,857 $0 $0 $334,575 $160,835 $158,960 $987 $955,641 $104,689 $0 $0 $0 $144,222 Meadowdale Club House $15,385 $0 $22,557 $0 $15,584 $23,186 $0 $7,569 $14,422 $4,818 $0 $0 $0 $14,826 $0 Old Public Works $43,506 $98,425 $33,065 $0 $98,898 $0 $0 $43,903 $0 $17,197 $50,041 $56,255 $0 $0 $0 Parks Maint. Building $18,960 $7,703 $33,985 $23,328 $8,536 $131,882 $4,651 $71,290 $7,806 $5,937 $13,295 $9,920 $0 $6,406 $131,968 Public Safety $705,845 $97,887 $43,081 $222,678 $264,853 $280,742 $92,092 $88,926 $0 $154,092 $356,298 $0 $0 $0 $812,426 Public Works O&M $745,020 $16,368 $297,843 $0 $122,745 $43,136 $316,994 $33,532 $188,478 $459,937 $593,237 $0 $181,701 $1,144 $0 Senior Center $0 $163,455 $0 $1,19,4 $0 $705,920 $117,446 $106,513 $0 $36,662 $9,422 $100,641 $0 $0 $0 Wade James Theater $0 $8,706 $25,987 $10,707 $0 $67,016 $17, 549 $0 $40,339 $262,566 $61, 034 $0 $8,885 $0 $0 Yost Pool House $4,360 $43, 035 $105,169 $27,239 $19,985 $322,391 $27,253 $36,640 $9,205 $0 $74,853 $47,872 $39,682 $94,354 $16,487 City Total §2, 182,298 $869,684 $839,730 $2,457,194 $985,665 $3,712,57 $1,388,948 $1,025,942 $654,240 $2,944,857 $2,261,021 1 $812,018 1 $491,929 1 $1,140,917 1 $2,436,04R Packet Pg. 153 6.1.c _ 0 m 3 a� z 4- 0 m _ Cu ai _ _ _ a� _ _ R _ LL 0 m r _ 0 N m r L 0 Q U _ Cu _ r _ .C� C y Q R LL M r-+ _ d E t V R a f il1Stry PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL Packet Pg. 154 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 mom mom mom "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page 1 ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to a di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 155 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 oaa� mmm ©©0� 0®® "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page Z ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to a di f—t system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 156 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 Q "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page 3 ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to a di f—t system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 157 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 �m�� "��• ►�•r��i�ooaa� Dam "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page 4 ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to a di f—t system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 158 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 co-M&I mmm "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page 5 ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renwetlon of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 159 6.1.c City of Edmonds a����oaoa� mam •• ����oaaa� .. mm® 3 r Q "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Page 6 Packet Pg. 160 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page ] ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to a di f—t system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 161 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page 8 ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renwetlon of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 162 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 Q-Tv Bidding Equipmerd Tag Sy —Type Equipment Type Location Description ManufacNrer Sedal Number Model Number q p MSixe Approximate Install Dab Eatimabd L'Re it AUN Cond— (,ii) mA."M ImPeM(1-5) Constituent Fil-g(1-5) Eati—gid Replit-Anerd Coet$ Nobs 4— Lih Expectancy 2ntl Replacement St., Repbwmerd Cemetery Builtling NIA Fencing Fencing E#edor 8 3 1 1 $42.660 Allowance br bn. repair and ment erery 20 rears, 20 28 48 City Hall NIA Fencing Fencing E#edor 15 2 1 5 $5,724 Alloance br bnce repair and ment even 20 rears, 20 35 55 Fining Pier NIA Fencing Fencing E#edor 2016 19 1 3 3 "US) Allcowance 1,railing repair and ry 20 rears. 20 39 59 Frances Antlerson Center NIA Fencing Fencing E#edor 0 3 1 5 $11536 Allowance br bnce repair and erery 20 years, 20 28 48 F516 IA N. Fencing Fencing E#edor 14 2 2 $5000 Allowance bantr once repair and ant erery 20 years, 20 34 54 F51] NIA Fencing Fencing Exbdor 12 3 2 $3,240 All— br fence repair and menterery 20 years, 20 32 52 F520 NIA Fencing Fencing Exbdor 9 3 2 U.—erery All— fcr once repair and 20— 20 29 49 Libary NIA Fencing Penang —4.1 17 2 1 5 $27.500 All 11 fling repel, and very 20 veers. 20 3] 5] Meatlowdale Club House NIA Fencing Penang EMed0r 9 3 3 $6ABU All—br fence repalr and —, 20 rears 20 29 49 Old Public Works NIA Fencing Penang EMed0r 12 3 1 $9.936 Allowance far fence repalr and eaery 20 rears 20 32 52 Perks Meint. WillNIA Fencing Penang Exled0r 3 4 1 $20.000 Allowancle b, fencelrelling repalr and ersry 20 rears 20 23 43 Public Saay NIA Fencing Penang Exled0r 12 3 4 $1.400 All—nrailing and ce b, 'Pt" ¢very 20 veers pcenca 20 32 52 Public Works O&M NIA Fencing Penang Exled0r 11 3 2 VS.—ersry Allmrefar fence repalr and 20 rears 20 31 51 Wetle James Theater NIA Fencing Penang Exled0r 5 4 $1.890 Allowance far fence repalr and —, 20 rears 20 25 45 Yost IHausa NIA Fencing Penang Exled0r 8 3 4 $15.066 Allowance far fence repalr and ersry 20 rears 20 28 48 Boys and Oil Club NIA Fire and Life Safety —Alarm Sysbma Front Porch—M Silent Hnight -1001C 2011 14 3 5 5 $10,284 All kt, fire alarm panels h., dl ..It Ilghtlng, and d-A. every 20 years. 20 34 54 City Hell NIA Flre antl ISally Fire Alarm Systems Fire Alarm Control Roan FCI FC-]2 120V 1995 2 4 5 5 $51.111 All b, Are alarm panels, home, 9rebes. exit lightng. and detention system replapemenla even 20 years. 20 22 42 Frances Anderson Center NIA Fire and Life Safety Fire Alarm .,.M.Room 131 (SNregin Edwards System Techn0bgy EST2 12D VAC 2003 e 4 5 5 $82,500 Allowance— alarm panels, hwna, es, exit Ilghtlng, and d-A. every 20 years. 20 26 48 FS 16 NIA Flre antl L. Safety Flre All Sysems Entry Foyer Ed —(EST) EST2 120VAC 2003 6 5 5 2 $16.050 b, Are alarm panels, home, Ace 9rebes. exit lightng. antl tleteMion system replacements every 20 - 20 26 46 FS 20 NIA Fire and LXe Safety Fire Alarm Sysbma UXIny Rcom Finn, -Alarms MP-12I24 120VAC 2007 fo 3 5 2 $9,600 All for fire alarm panels hens, dl ..It Ilghtlng, and d-A. system replacements every 20 yeas. 20 3d 50 Library NIA Flre antl Lik, Safety Fire Alarm Systems Fire Panel RCOm Burch FP0.]024 120 VAC 2009 12 3 5 5 $29.280 ce br Are alarm panels, h. , Aarcbes. exit lightlng. antl detegion system repbcamenta every 20 years. 20 32 52 Old Public WOAs NIA ire antl LNe Safey Fire Alarm Sysbma PU Fk—gelOOf Sentrol 1503 120 VAC 2003 e 5 5 1 $21,150 Allowance br Are alarm panels, h... sh0bes, edtllghtlng,anddeteclbn system replacements every 20 20 28 40 Public—y NIA Flre antl Urfa S-y Fire —Systems Fire A — Panel Rm. EST ES 1—c 1-3 4 5 4 $46.410 M1omsyears. ce b, Are alarm panels , Aslrcbes. exit lightlng. antl detegion system replacement every 20 years. 20 23 43 Public Woks O&M Fire AIPBit rot ire antl LNe Safey Fire Alarm Sysbma Mach. Room Simpbx 1995 2 4 5 2 $42,000 Allowance br Are alarm panels, h... sh0bes, At Ilghtlng, antl deteclbn system replacement every 20 yeas. 20 22 42 Senior Center NIA Fire antl L'Re SefNy Fire Alarm Systems Foyer by BilltMS Rc0m mil contras 71005ats 2002 3 4 5 5 WAS nce b, Are alarm panels, M1oms, Aslrcbes. exit lighting. antl detegion system reptcament every 20 - 20 23 43 Wetle James Theater NIA Fl. antl LNe Safey Fire Alarm Sysbma (untlemeaM1 stars) Silent knight tt-5208 120 VAC 1996 2 4 5 4 $9.434 All br Are alarm panels, h... sh0bes, edtllghtlng,anddetclbn system replacement every 20 yeas. 20 22 42 Ycat Pcol Hcuae NIA Fire antl L'Re SefNy Fire Alarm Systems Sbrege Roan2 EtlwaMs 120VAC 2007 10 3 5 4 $6.996 ce br Are alarm panels, M1oms, Aarcbes. exit lightlng, end tletegion system reptcament every 20 years. 20 30 50 FS 16 #3 HVAC Furnace I 2ntl F., Mech Rm Tnne 17033JA02G TOH1BBfeBDA9421 I HIP, ]],o0013— 2011 22 1 5 2 122,418 Replaced 2017 22 44 66 FS 16 #4 HVAC Furnace 2ntl F., Mech Rm Lennox 5003B 65712 GHR26O3-]58 II HP. ]5.00013— 2003 0 3 5 2 421.0]5 22 30 52 FS 10 A5 HI Pomace 2ntl Fkror Mach Rm Lennox 58038 51858 GHR26 84I5-120. 3I4 HP, 12o,eon It— 2003 e 3 5 2 $35,000 22 An 52 FS 16 #2 HVAG Furnace 2ntl Fkpr Mach Rm Lennox 58038 44210 G28O415-]58 314 HP, ]5,000 BNM 2003 2 4 5 2 $21,875 In— mnd.""m causing rust, d1niiinWannin._ on Poor beneah 22 24 48 FS 16 FS 16 #8 #1 HVAG HVAC Furnace Furnace 2ntl Floor Mach Rm 2ntl Fba Meth Rm Lennox Lennox 58038 85722 5003B 44220 GHR28O3-]54t G26O4I5-758 to HP. ]5.000 BNM 3. HP.]5,000 B—, 2003 2003 8 2 3 4 5 5 2 2 $21.8]5 $21,875 MalMenance notes hour 200512008 DN SlInlficantrustnsaicndue to leaking onde 22 22 30 24 52 46 FS 20 p3 HVAC Furnace U51iry Rc0m Trene ]1]3YLC1G TUDIB A9381 1. HP, 80,000 B—, 2007 12 2 5 2 $23,333 22 3a 56 FS 20 p1 HVAC Furnace U51iry Rc0m Trene 7281 S2D1G O1Bm A9381 I. HP, 60,000 B—, 2007 12 2 5 2 $17,500 Newwntrds int—lid-1] 22 34 56 FS 20 N2 HVAC Furnace Utility— Trene 731—IS TUDIGI00 481 1. HP. I.,000 B—, 2007 12 2 5 2 $2%167 22 34 56 FS 20 p4 HVAC Furnace Utility— Trene 7192N 0 TUD1,555 81 113 HP. 60,000 B]Udn 2007 12 2 5 2 $17,500 22 34 56 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement It d , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page g systems Ilk, ducting, piping, or conduit, upgrading to, di ferent system type, a renovation of the building. Packet Pg. 163 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. PNe 10 Packet Pg. 164 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Page 11 Packet Pg. 165 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 co-M&I • ��� • �aooa� �aa "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Page 12 Packet Pg. 166 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. PNe 13 Packet Pg. 167 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 B.ilding Equip. -Tag Sy —Type Equipment Type Location it—nopn NanuticNmr Serial Number Nptlel Number Equip noise Appmpimata Eat —d— Asset Cad— Occupant Constituent Eslimabtl Ndes L'Re 2ntl lrtl Inntall Oati Remaining (-S) ImPad(1-5) Facing(1-5) RaplacemeMGoetf Expectancy Replacement Repl.—nt Recap dInstalling new system type Frances Antl—Center N/A HVAC ftatllant Heating Rcom 114(Clessmwn) 8Fwt 1952 1 4 4 5 $2,000 forocupant comlcrl and energy eficienq. 40 41 81 Bece Inatallbg new system type ces FenA--n ter Center NIA HVAC ftatlent Heating Reom 114 (Glassman) 8 Feol 1952 1 4 4 5 $2,000 amow for upanl comlal antl energy eficienq. 40 41 81 Recanmentl Installing new system type Fences A-- Center NIA HVAC R—nt Heating 1st Fbor H,II a 8 Feol 1952 1 4 4 5 $900 for —-in comfort and energy efi 1— 40 41 81 Recommend Installing new system type Fmn. Antl—Center NIA HVAC Ratllant Hwtlng 1st Fbor HnIIa 6F. 1952 1 4 4 5 $900 br occupant comfal and energy eficienq. 40 41 81 Raw ex system type Frances Antleracn Center NIA HVAC -n—Healing Roam 1131—) 5Fcot 1952 1 4 4 5 $999 oco bar upant ombrt ind energy eNcienw. 40 41 81 Rwan—d Installing new system type Fmncea And —Center N. HVAC RMiant Heaenit 1st Fbor H.IIre 4Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $1,299 br occupant comM and energy eNcienw. 40 41 et Recommentl Installing new system type Fmncea And —Center N. HVAC RMlant Healing —112 6Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $999 br occupant comM and energy Ncienw. 40 41 et Rwwnmen0 Installing new system We Frances Antlemgn Center N. HVAC Ratllant Hea5n8 Rowe 112 6Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 8999 br occupant comM antl energy Nciena. 00 41 et Rwwnmen0 Installing new system type Frances Antlemgn Center NIA HVAC Ratllant Hea5n8 Rowe 112 6Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 8999 br occupant comM antl energy Ncienw. Oo 41 et Rwwnmentl Installing new system type Frances Antlerwn Center NIA HVAC Ratllant Hea5n8 Room 1111Sno-kbg) 6Foot t952 1 4 4 5 8999 br occupant comM antl energy Ncienw. Oo 41 et Rwwnmentl Installing new system We Frances Antlerwn Center NIA HVAC RaMant Hea5n8 Room 1111Sno-kbg) 6Foot t952 1 4 4 5 8999 br occupant comM antl energy Ncienw. 40 41 et Rww1—Ip Installing new sysem type Frances Antlemgn Center NIA HVAC Ratllant Hea5n8 1st Fbor HalNrey 6Foot t952 1 4 4 5 8999 br occupant comM antl energy Nillimg 00 41 et Rwwnmentl Installing new system type Frances Antlemgn Center N. HVAC Ratllant Hea5n8 1st Fbor HalNrey 6Foot t952 1 4 4 5 8999 br occupant comM antl energy Rciena. 00 41 et Recommen0 Installing new system type Frances Antlerwn Center N. HVAC Ratllant Hea5n8 1st Fbor HalNrey 6Foot t952 1 4 4 5 $999 br occupant comM antl energy eNcienw. 40 41 et Fmncea And —Center a5n8 Ist Fbor Gids ResVaom 10 Foot $2500 In pow conilii. Recanmentl installing em Ime. Rcoan d Installing new system type Fmncea And —Center N. HVAC R—nt H—n8 South Staimell 4Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $1,299 br occupant comM and energy eRcienw. 40 41 et Frances Andaman Center NIA HVAC RMlant Heaeng —125 6Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $gnn Unit B—d—Furniture. Ftypr end aew lling nsyem ype.st 40 41 B1 Rcoanmend Installing new— type F.... An —Center WA HVAC Ratllant Heating Roan 124(B—) 4— 1952 1 4 4 5 $1,200 in, occupant comfort and energy Rci—, 40 41 B1 Ravtnmend Installing new system type Fmncea And. —Center WA HVAC RMlant Heating cam 12T(&.db C) It Fmt 1952 1 4 4 5 $9n9 br occupant comfort and energy eRciency. 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing nex system type Fmncea And. —Center WA HVAC RMNnt Heating cam 1.(..db C) 6Fmt 1952 1 4 4 5 $999 br occupant comfort and energy eRciency. 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing nex system type Fmncea And —Center WA HVAC RatlNnt Heating cam 1.(..db C) It Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $999 br occupant comM and energy eRciency. 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing nex system type Fmncea Andaman Center WA HVAC Ratllant Heating Roan 123 (Cantimnco) 6Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $999 br occupant comM and energy eRciency. 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing new ryslem type Fmncea And —Center WA HVAC RatlNnt Heating 1&Floor H,IIa eFmt 1952 1 4 4 5 $2.000 br occupant—. and energy eRciency. 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing new ryslem type Fmncea And. —Center WA HVAC RatlNnt Heating —121 6Foot 1952 1 4 4 5 $900 br occupant comM and energy eRciency. 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing new ryslem type Fmncea And. —Center WA HVAC RMlant Heating —121 6Fmt 1952 1 4 4 5 $900 br occupant comM and energy Rcien 40 41 B1 RecoInstilling nex ayabm tyye Frances And. —Center WA HVAC RatlNnt Heating Roan 121 6Fmt 1952 1 4 4 5 $900 in,, . occupant comM antl energy Rcien 40 41 B1 RecoInstalling nex aye, tyye F..— And.—nter Ce Antle WVAC A H RatlNnt eating H cam 128lNtontessM) BFoot 1952 1 4 4 5 $2,000 nerg in,, . occupant comfort aney tl Rcien 40 41 B1 Recommend Installing nex system tyye Emotes And— Center WA HVAC RatlNnt Heating cam 128lNtontessM) BFmt 1952 1 0 • 5 $2,000 in, occupaMcomfat and energy eMdenc4. 40 41 B1 HelMey Oulatle Rcam Recanmend Installing new-- type Fmnwa And—Genter WA HVAC Ratlbnt HeatlnB 131 2— 1952 1 4 • 5 $T50 br owupanlc MM and energy .denc4. 40 41 81 Recanmend Installing new system type Fmnwa And.—Genter NIA HVAC RMbnt HeatlnB Room 132(13ay e) 4— 1el2 1 4 • 5 $1,200 br owupanl c MM antl energy .denc4. 40 41 81 Recanmend Installing new-- type Fmnwa And.—Genter NIA HVAC -.nt HeatlnB m13.(Oa—) 6Fod 1el2 1 4 • 5 $900 br ocupant c MM and energy .denc4. 40 41 81 HelMey Oula tle d Reonmend Installing new ii,— typF..—Fmn And.—Genter NIA HVAC Ratllant HeatlnB goon 1Wd,31A BFad 1el2 1 4 • 5 $900 in, occupant ooMal and energy eMd.- 40 41 81 "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It does not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary systems Ilk, duding, piping, or conduit, upgrading to, dlHerent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. PNe 14 Packet Pg. 168 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 Q "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Page 15 Packet Pg. 169 6.1.c City of Edmonds ��maaa� ®m0 ��maaa� ®m0 mom mom 3 m z 0 a2 R C R C d C C R C LL C O m C N d O Q d d v c O C O C cu 2 in d r R U- M C d E t v O r r Q "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to, di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Page 16 Packet Pg. 170 6.1.c City of Edmonds 3 Q 'Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement It tloes not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary systems Ilke ducting, piping, or conduit, upgreding to a different system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Pie 17 Packet Pg. 171 6.1.c City of Edmonds co-M&I ®®®®®®®®®®®©0©® MEN 3 r Q "Replacement costs are for "like for like' replacement. It tl , not represent the costs for replacing the supporting or ancillary Page 18 ,ye— Ilk, ductinq, piping, or conduit, upg,ding to a di f,rent system type, a renovation of the bulldinq. Packet Pg. 172 6.1.d a E ®nos B 0 , B B B Public Facilities Disci f( TO: Mayor Mike Nelson FR: Edmonds Public Facilities District Board of Directors DA: June 7, 2021 RE: Request to Execute Refinancing of Edmonds Public Facilities District's 2012 Bonds At a Special Meeting of the Edmonds Public Facilities District Board of Directors on May 7, 2021, Rob Shelley of Piper Sandler, the District's Financial Advisor, presented background information and several possible scenarios for restructuring the District's outstanding capital debt. ECA staff also provided some additional context and a list of key decision points for the Board's consideration as it seeks to determine the best course of action. On May 27th, at a Regular Meeting of the District Board, ECA staff provided a recommendation to the Board outlining proposed timing, structure, and terms for refinancing a portion of the District's current debt. After careful consideration, the District Board voted to pursue the following: r! • Request that the City of Edmonds pursue a refinancing of the District's 2012 Bonds. z These Bonds were issued by the City of Edmonds on behalf of the District in 2012, 2 L backed by the District's Sales Tax revenue streams, and were included in a larger 0 refinancing package issued by the City that year. N • Request that the new Bonds be issued once again in the name of the City of Edmonds to 0 secure the best possible bond rating and lowest possible interest rate. E • Extend this portion of the District's debt to the year 2041. This action will help the District meet a new legislative requirement outlined in the 2017 update to the PFD legislation, and will ensure that the Sales Tax Rebate from the State of Washington is secured through the current Public Facilities District sunset date of December 2041. • Request that the City make all efforts to refinance this debt prior to December 1, 2021. This will provide the District with short-term cash relief as it will not be required to make a principal payment on this debt in the current fiscal year. This may only be accomplished by issuing Taxable Bonds rather than Tax Exempt Bonds. However, moving to refinance this debt soon may also secure a lower interest rate for the District than it could secure if it waits for the natural call date of December 2022. Packet Pg. 173 6.1.d The District has identified a list of positive outcomes from pursuing an early refinancing of the its 2012 Bonds, in partnership with the City of Edmonds: • Short-term cash flow relief for the District in 2021, which will greatly aid our operations as we recover from the pandemic shutdown and build toward a successful reopening. • Reduced annual debt payments, ensuring net positive cash flow from the District's Sales Tax Revenue streams through 2041. • Net positive cash flow beginning in 2021 will allow the District to pay down the other components of its debt (Direct Loan from the City of Edmonds, First Financial Bank Loan) more quickly. There is no penalty for early repayment of either of these loans. However, early repayment could save thousands of dollars in interest for the District in the coming years. • Once the District's other debts are retired, net positive cash flow could be invested in future capital improvements or replacements, and/or new projects. With positive cash flow from the Sales Tax Revenue streams, the District would focus first on early repayment of the City Loan first to further strengthen the partnership between the District and the City as projects like the 4t" Avenue Cultural Corridor and other mutually - beneficial investments move forward. Early repayment of the Bank Loan would follow once the City Loan is repaid. This would help the District save on interest, but it should be noted that early repayment of this debt may also reduce the return the City is currently receiving from the corresponding Certificate of Deposit it made to help guarantee the Bank Loan for the District. Thank you for your consideration of this request. The Edmonds Public Facilities District Board and ECA staff are grateful for the partnership and support our organization receives from the City of Edmonds. a 0 a� z Packet Pg. 174