2022-05-11 Planning Board PacketC)p E 04
� O
Planning Board
Remote Zoom Meeting
Agenda
121 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
www.edmondswa.gov
Michelle Martin
425-771-0220
Wednesday, May 11, 2022 7:00 PM Virtual Online Meeting
Remote Meeting Information
Join Zoom Meeting: https://edmondswa-
gov.zoom.us/j/88526558062?pwd=YUtoNGFFQ210Q2U5SDdwRUFadX15dz09
Meeting ID: 885 2655 8062. Passcode: 598700
Call into the meeting by dialing: 253-215-8782
Land Acknowledgement for Indigenous Peoples
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their
successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken
care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their
sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.
1. Call to Order
Attendee Name Present Absent Late Arrived
2. Approval of Minutes
A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6405)
Approval of Minutes
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Approve draft minutes from April 27th meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• PB220427d (PDF)
Planning Board Page 1 Printed 51612022
Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda May 11, 2022
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
A.
Announcement of Agenda
Audience Comments
Administrative Reports
Public Hearings
Unfinished Business
New Business
Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6427)
2024 Comprehensive Plan Update Discussion
Background/History
The Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan") is a document that guides the City of Edmonds decisions
on a wide range of topics and services over a 20-year time period. As the Plan acts as the
blueprints for development in the city, it will impact neighborhoods, businesses, traffic, the
environment and you. The Plan is also meant to reflect the vision and priorities of the city and
residents, while meeting the requirements of state and federal law.
Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that cities and counties update
their Comprehensive Plans on a periodic schedule. This is an opportunity to revise population
and employment growth forecasts with the most up to date data, review existing policies to
ensure they make sense for the community, write new policies that reflect the priorities of
Edmonds, and confirm that all federal state and local requirements are met.
Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that cities and counties update
their Comprehensive Plans on a periodic schedule. This is an opportunity to revise population
and employment growth forecasts with the most up to date data, review existing policies to
ensure they make sense for the community, write new policies that reflect the priorities of
Edmonds, and confirm that all federal state and local requirements are met.
The purpose of the 2024 Update is to comply with the requirements of the GMA in RCW
36.70A.130 for the City of Edmonds to:
• Plan for the next 20 years of population and employment growth
• Review and revise the Plan and development regulations to ensure they comply with
the requirements of the GMA.
The deadline for adoption of this update is December 31, 2024.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss Comprehensive Plan Scoping and provide input.
Planning Board Page 2 Printed 51612022
Remote Zoom Meeting Agenda
9. Planning Board Extended Agenda
A. Generic Agenda Item (ID # 6426)
Extended Agenda
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review Extended Agenda
ATTACHMENTS:
• 05.06.2022 Extended Agenda (PDF)
10. Planning Board Chair Comments
11. Planning Board Member Comments
12. Adjournment
May ll, 2022
Planning Board Page 3 Printed 51612022
2.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/11/2022
Approval of Minutes
Staff Lead: Kernen Lien
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michelle Martin
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Approve draft minutes from April 27th meeting.
Narrative
Draft meeting minutes attached.
Attachments:
PB220427d
Packet Pg. 4
2.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Webinar Meeting
April 27, 2022
CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chair Pence called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:01 p.m.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
Board Member Cheung read the land acknowledgement.
ROLL CALL
Board Members Present
Roger Pence, Vice Chair
Matt Cheung
Judi Gladstone 1
Mike Rosen
Beth Tragus-Campbell (alternate)
Board Members Absent
Alicia Crank, Chair (excused)
Todd Cloutier (excused)
Richard Kuehn (excused)
Lily Distelhorst (student rep) (excused)
Staff Present
Kemen Lien, Interim Planning Division Manager
Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Manager
Consultants:
Bob Bengford, MAKERS
Scott Bonjukian, MAKERS
The Board welcomed new Board Member Beth Tragus-Campbell who introduced herself.
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
CAMPBELL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 13 AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
'Board Member Gladstone arrived at 7:10 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Pagel of 7
Packet Pg. 5
2.A.a
Natalie Seitz referred to comments the Planning Board made in response to the Draft PROS Plan public hearing
on February 23. She expressed concern about comments that resources can't be spread across the city because
they have to be where natural features are. There were also comments about the value of western versus eastern
watersheds. She referred to a technical memorandum she sent the Planning Board ahead of the meeting which
demonstrates multiple levels of structural and subjective bias, does not include equity factors in the scoring, and
devalues water resources when they cross boundaries. She also expressed concern about decisions the city staff
made when directing the content of the memorandum, both in the metrics used and how they are identified. She
asserted that the idea that eastern watersheds do not have natural resources to support open space investment is
false. She also referred to the statement that natural features are needed to be present for open space and noted
that the definition of open space was changed in the latest draft of the PROS plan to include concepts of
restoration. She believes this was done specifically to accommodate the acquisition of the Unocal property that
was heavily industrialized with little, if any natural features remaining. She asked why the Planning Board uses
natural features as a requirement for investment in underserved areas and does not apply the same standard to
the Unocal property. She expressed concern about staff s recommendation to build a road through the Unocal
property.
Jay Grant, Commissioner at Port of Edmonds, expressed interest in the waterfront presentation being held
tonight. He did not think that staff was recommending building a road at the UNOCAL site, but there is already
one there in the abandoned area. He explained that the Port of Edmonds is a separate jurisdiction from the City
of Edmonds. He invited the City to reach out to him with any questions.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study
Interim Planning Division Manager Kernen Lien introduced this topic related to the Edmonds Crossing project,
which is no longer active.
Bob Bengford, MAKERS, reviewed some background information, work that has been completed to date, some
recommendations summary, and next steps. The project purpose was to identify strategic updates and high-level
recommendations to be considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information
about waterfront uses, needs, and issues.
Scott Bonjukian, MAKERS, summarized work to date including an online meeting and stakeholder interviews.
Live polling indicated that marsh restoration, flooding/sea level rise, and waterfront access issues were the top
concerns for the community. Key priorities in written comments were enhancing the marsh as a wildlife reserve
and avoiding development, planning for climate change, and retaining the unique charm, character, and natural
features of the waterfront. Four top recommendations to address in the Comprehensive Plan are creating a new
vision for the waterfront; recognizing and supporting the Edmonds ferry terminal's current location; prioritizing
the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek Restoration; and planning for improved emergency management of the
waterfront.
Key findings and recommendations from MAKERS were reviewed for 11 issues which were studied:
1. Edmonds Crossing: The project originated in the 1990's and was active until 2005. Evidence points to
the project being effectively cancelled with no signs of life.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Page 2 of 7
Packet Pg. 6
2.A.a
Recommendations: Update the Downtown Waterfront vision in a community engagement process as
part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. Address how each Edmonds Crossing reference should
be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan update.
2. Ferry Service: WSF (Washington State Ferries) plans three -boat service for Edmonds -Kingston to
increase service frequency and capacity. WSF has not analyzed impacts of train traffic. The WSF Long
Range Plan anticipates a study of Edmonds terminal improvements.
Recommendations: Develop policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and its current location.
When three -boat service or a vehicle reservation system advances, the City should collaborate on joint
transportation planning. Adopt a transportation policy that calls for a ferry traffic study to assess the
impacts of ferry traffic on the Downtown Waterfront. The study should quantify the current number and
duration of train crossing closures at Main Street and Dayton Street.
3. Unocal Property: The site is zoned Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) under a 2002 contract rezone.
If a different zoning is envisioned (e.g., open space), the City must approve a new master plan as a
a
comprehensive plan amendment, a planned residential development, or a contract rezone. Alternatively,
the City or the property owner may initiate a rezone at any time.
0
Recommendations: Exercise the right of first purchase by June 2023 or update the City's legislative
'o
agenda to include an extension of the right. Determine the community's desired future land use of the
a
Unocal property. This public process is expected to result in a redesignating and rezoning of the Unocal
a
property for open space purposes. If this is the case, additional recommendations apply for the process.
Retain an outside firm to perform a development feasibility assessment of the Unocal property to
v
determine its fair market value. These analyses should consider the site's accessibility, ecological
N
features, contamination, and other customary real estate considerations
m
4. Edmonds Marsh & Willow Creek Restoration: The main action needed for restoration is daylighting
Willow Creek and improving fish access to migrate, rear, and forage in the marsh. A sinuous channel
east of the railroad will provide beneficial habitat for fish and other animals. Stakeholders have
expressed interest in moving the creek further away from the railroad tracks than illustrated in
conceptual designs. WSDOT has no concerns with this if public process, environmental considerations
around contamination, and appropriate compensation lead to that conclusion.
Recommendations: Continue prioritizing the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project. If
Edmonds acquires the Unocal property, update the design options for Willow Creek restoration to
optimize ecological outcomes and further improve fish habitat. Coordinate with adjacent property
owners on pollutant control to minimize untreated runoff into Edmonds Marsh.
5. Flooding and Sea Level Rise: The waterfront is within a 100-year floodplain. Sea level rise of 4 inches
to 4 feet is expected over the next century. The Edmonds Marsh restoration project in combination with
extreme king tides, storm surges, and future sea level rise may increase flooding.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Page 3 of 7
Packet Pg. 7
2.A.a
Recommendations: Update/modernize Comprehensive Plan policies to prepare for future flooding and
sea level rise. Plan for flood mitigation as an essential component of the Edmonds Marsh restoration
project.
6. Railroad Double -Tracking: BNSF Railway plans a second track between Edmonds Street and Point
Wells. It will be located within the BNSF Railway right-of-way. Construction is anticipated to begin in
2024. Specific design plans are not available.
Recommendations: Create additional planning policies that support mitigation of railroad traffic. Apply
to create a quiet zone, which reduces the sounding of train horns in exchange for upgrading crossing
safety. Seek to minimize construction impacts and maintain Edmonds Station's full function.
7. Waterfront Emergency Access: Approximately 40 trains run daily today. The "gate down" time
currently averages about two minutes per train. Future projections show 60-80 trains per day. The
waterfront and marina area west of the railroad have special emergency access considerations because
of the isolation. Ferry delays have been documented.
a�
Recommendations: Create new policies to jointly plan and implement enhanced emergency c
management services in the area. Pursue a previous recommendation to plan for a midblock pedestrian
overpass. Plan an emergency vehicle overpass below Point Edwards to Admiral Way. 0
8. Edmonds Station Access Projects and Sound Transit Service: Commuter rail service is 4 daily trips a
compared to 8 pre-COVID. Due to financial challenges, the station access projects are delayed by ten 0.
a
years. a
Recommendation: Incorporate the station access projects into the Comprehensive Plan. Support the
project's implementation as soon as possible.
9. Bus Service: In 2024, bus service will better connect downtown Edmonds to the Lynnwood and
Mountlake Terrace light rail stations. Most lines will run every 15 minutes, requiring new downtown
layover space. Future extension of the Orange Line and a south "emphasis corridor" are unfunded.
Recommendations: Continue joint planning of the downtown transit center improvements and promote
more direct service to the light rail stations. Add policy support for bus service improvements on local
streets.
10. Port of Edmonds: Bulkhead reconstruction is ongoing. New administration building is estimated to be
completed by 2024. No other projects planned.
Recommendations: As they arise, continue coordinating infrastructure and development planning
between the City and the Port.
11. Land Use and Economic Development: Edmonds stands out with its historic character, human -scaled
development pattern, and walkable waterfront. The major properties in the study are well -utilized,
including Harbor Square, Salish Crossing, and the Edmonds Waterfront Center/Senior Center. The
community's vision for the level of density and vibrancy on the Downtown Waterfront is unclear.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Page 4 of 7
Packet Pg. 8
2.A.a
Recommendations: Visioning — Craft an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront as part of the
2024 Comprehensive Plan update. The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the
type and intensity of desired land uses. The vision should reflect market realities, sea level rise, and
other conditions. Consider adopting policies that support working to attract a hotel operator and
associated uses. Consider adopting policies that allow a wider mix of land uses in the CW zone. Support
an adaptive reuse incentive program, which can provide technical or financial assistance to property
owners. Continue efforts to finish the waterfront walkway. Explore infill/redevelopment concepts that
explore the tradeoffs of modest and strategic development capacity changes in exchange for desired
public benefits and amenities. Conduct a comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront
area to understand current utilization, find opportunities for consolidated parking and shared parking,
and analyze possible changes to parking regulations for off-street and on -street parking. The study
should compare Edmonds and similar downtown waterfronts.
Mr. Lien reviewed next steps.
Questions/Comments:
Vice Chair Pence asked if staff agrees with all the recommendations in the report. Mr. Lien replied that they do,
and staff worked closely with MAKERS on this.
Board Member Rosen asked how this intersects with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Lien explained that the
technical studies will be incorporated with the EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) of the Comprehensive
Plan. Board Member Rosen asked about the visioning for the waterfront and for the Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Lien explained that these will be done concurrently. Board Member Rosen asked about public notification for
the open house held in the fall. Mr. Lien explained they issued press releases and had it on the website. For the
2024 Comprehensive Plan update they are working on a broader public engagement strategy.
Board Member Gladstone asked how they would evaluate the benefit to salmon of daylighting the creek. Mr.
Lien explained that a key benefit would be refuge habitat for juvenile Chinook salmon. Board Member
Gladstone asked Mr. Bengford about clarification of his comments that the vibrancy of the waterfront is unclear
and there are some interesting economic assessments from outside people coming in. Mr. Bengford explained
that in the Comprehensive Plan the types of development allowed have an impact on redevelopment. There is
not a real vision for the waterfront properties. Additionally, there seems to be a desire to keep things as they are
and prohibit development. The consultant is recommending consideration of strategic capacity increases. Board
Member Gladstone asked what the public benefits and amenities would be in exchange for allowing increases
in development heights. Mr. Bengford explained it would be up to the community to consider what those would
be. They could be things like pedestrian space, connections, ground floor activated uses, parking, environmental
benefits, or architectural features.
Board Member Campbell asked what the average length of the trains is. Mr. Bonjukian replied that the industry
standard for train length now is about 10,000 feet/2 miles. Also, regarding pedestrian and emergency personnel
access via foot over the railroad track, she asked if they could consider ATV access for law enforcement and
EMTs. Mr. Bonjukian explained that the proposal is to do a grade separated crossing which would be an
overpass over the train track that would be open at all times and wouldn't be affected by the trains stopped or
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Page 5 of 7
Packet Pg. 9
2.A.a
train length. Regarding having motorized access integrated with the pedestrian crossing, they would need to
look into this more.
Board Member Campbell referred to the "4 inches to 4 feet" of estimated sea level rise and noted this is an
incredibly broad range. She asked if they can get closer to a target. Mr. Lien explained that the latest reports say
2 feet x 2100 and take subduction and rise into consideration. Board Member Campbell referred to daylighting
of the creek and asked about concerns about the potential for flooding increases. Mr. Lien explained that the
latest modeling had to install sea walls along the railroad tracks in the northeast corner along the marsh. Without
those the whole waterfront flooded. Board Member Campbell asked for more data as to why that would be the
case. Mr. Lien offered to send a link to the Council meeting where this was presented. What they were looking
at is the king tides or rain events, there is nowhere for the water to go.
Vice Chair Pence noted that double -tracking the Burlington Northern through the Edmonds Station means that
riders would have to cross the northbound track for loading on the southbound trains, or it would require an
overpass. He asked if this is an issue that will be studied in more detail for the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr.
Bonjukian said that Sound Transit does not plan to build a passenger platform on the west side. This is another
reason to look into a mid -block pedestrian overpass to provide options. Vice Chair Pence noted that if Sound
a
Transit and Amtrak need an overpass to accommodate loading and unloading trains then presumably it could
be designed to accommodate gurneys and/or ATVs. Mr. Lien pointed out that the recommendation includes
coordination with other jurisdictions.
0
Board Member Rosen commented that this was a fascinating report, and he appreciated the work that went into
a
it. He referred to BNSF's planned double -tracking in 2024 and asked where they heard that. Mr. Bonjukian
a
replied they heard it from a staff person at BNSF, but they were careful to say it is uncertain and depends on
permitting and other factors. Board Member Rosen asked how much of Railroad Avenue BNSF owns. Mr. Lien
v
was not sure. Board Member Rosen asked if BNSF had brought up triple tracking. Mr. Bonjukian replied they
N
have not heard anything about that.
m
Board Member Rosen referred to community engagement options, he recommended that the examples listed
on packet page 28 be deleted since they are too limiting, and the City is about to engage in a much more robust
process for the Comprehensive Plan update process. Board Member Rosen referred to references to height limits
and asked if there had been any discussion about looking at height limits in a different way, such as through the
lens of a shadow study. Mr. Lien commented that this is a touchy issue, but they can raise it during the public
engagement process. There may be strategic locations where they can get more height for some public benefit,
but this is unclear.
Board Member Gladstone asked what happens next. Mr. Lien explained the study will be presented to Council.
The visioning and scoping will be the first part of the process as they move forward. Staff is working with PRR
to develop an equitable engagement strategy which will be implemented throughout the update.
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
Vice Chair Pence and Mr. Lien reviewed the extended agenda. Mr. Lien noted there would also be a site -specific
rezone public hearing on the May 25 meeting.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Page 6 of 7
Packet Pg. 10
2.A.a
Board members welcomed Board Member Campbell. Board Member Campbell requested assistance in getting
up to speed on projects as quickly as possible and thanked the City for the opportunity.
STAFF COMMENTS
Mr. Lien noted that they have been interviewing for the code writer and hope to get somebody on board soon.
One of the first things will be to address the multifamily design standards. The City Council is considering
changes to the designated street front within the BD2. They extended the multifamily moratorium to June 2.
There will likely be an interim ordinance until the permanent ordinance comes to the Planning Board.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:39 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
April 27, 2022 Page 7 of 7
Packet Pg. 11
8.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/11/2022
2024 Comprehensive Plan Update Discussion
Staff Lead: Kernen Lien
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Kernen Lien
Background/History
The Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan") is a document that guides the City of Edmonds decisions on a wide
range of topics and services over a 20-year time period. As the Plan acts as the blueprints for
development in the city, it will impact neighborhoods, businesses, traffic, the environment and you. The
Plan is also meant to reflect the vision and priorities of the city and residents, while meeting the
requirements of state and federal law.
Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that cities and counties update their
Comprehensive Plans on a periodic schedule. This is an opportunity to revise population and
employment growth forecasts with the most up to date data, review existing policies to ensure they
make sense for the community, write new policies that reflect the priorities of Edmonds, and confirm
that all federal state and local requirements are met.
Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that cities and counties update their
Comprehensive Plans on a periodic schedule. This is an opportunity to revise population and
employment growth forecasts with the most up to date data, review existing policies to ensure they
make sense for the community, write new policies that reflect the priorities of Edmonds, and confirm
that all federal state and local requirements are met.
The purpose of the 2024 Update is to comply with the requirements of the GMA in RCW 36.70A.130 for
the City of Edmonds to:
Plan for the next 20 years of population and employment growth
Review and revise the Plan and development regulations to ensure they comply with the
requirements of the GMA.
The deadline for adoption of this update is December 31, 2024.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss Comprehensive Plan Scoping and provide input.
Narrative
The City of Edmonds is just beginning the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update process. Staff will generally
discuss the Comprehensive Plan update with the Planning Board, scoping, and strategies for public
engagement at this Planning Board meeting.
While minor amendments to the Comprehensive Plan often happen year to year, such as yearly updates
Packet Pg. 12
8.A
to the Capital Facilities Plan, the last periodic update occurred in 2015. As noted the background section
above, the Plan is also meant to reflect the vision and priorities of the city. The current Plan lacks a
strong vision statement for the City of Edmonds. The city intends to make visioning a major component
of this update.
The City's Comprehensive Plan consists of nine separate elements including 1) Community
Sustainability, 2) Land Use, 3) Housing, 4) Economic Development, 5) Community Culture and Urban
Design, 6) Utilities, 7) Capital Facilities, 8) Transportation, and 9) Parks, Recreation and Open Space.
Some of these elements have additional specific plans that are adopted by reference which include the
Highway 99 Subarea Plan, Community Cultural Plan, and the Parks, Recreation and Opens Space Plan.
The City's Shoreline Master Program is also considered part of the Comprehensive Plan.
The City of Edmonds is intending to develop an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with this update
as well. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process will identify and analyze environmental
impacts associated with different future growth scenarios (land use alternatives). The public will be
invited to provide input on the scope of the environmental analysis and will also have an opportunity to
comment on a Draft EIS which describes the existing conditions, along with impacts and mitigation for
each land use alternative. Ultimately, a Final EIS will be prepared responding to public comments on the
draft EIS and analyze a preferred alternative.
One of the alternatives analyses must be based on the initial growth targets adopted by Snohomish
County. According to the initial growth targets Edmonds has a projected population of 55,966, a 13,113
increase over the 2020 Census population of 42,853. Based on the 2021 Buildable Lands Report, the City
of Edmonds has a shortfall of capacity for 3,920 of that project increase. As part of the Comprehensive
Plan update, the city will have to evaluate reasonable measures contained in the Snohomish
Countywide Planning Polices. Some of these reasonable measures are included in the recommendations
forwarded by the Citizens Housing Commission.
Along with the Housing Commission recommendation, the are several related projects that are
occurring currently that will feed into the Comprehensive Plan update including the Waterfront Issues
Study (presented to the Planning Board on April 27th), the Climate Action Plan, Highway 99 Community
Renewal, Redefining Streets and Public Places, Equitable Engagement Framework, and an
Equity/Climate Gap analysis.
Staff intends to incorporate Comprehensive Plan visioning into all current efforts as well as review input
that has been provided in other planning efforts such as the PROS plan update.
Packet Pg. 13
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/11/2022
Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: Kernen Lien
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Kernen Lien
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review Extended Agenda
Narrative
Extended Agenda attached.
Attachments:
05.06.2022 Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 14
Of b�0
9.A.a
Items and Dates are subject to change
PLANHWe BOARD
Extended Agenda
May 6, 2022
May 2022
May 25 1. Salmon Safe Certification
2. Site Specific Rezone Public Hearing:
PLN2022-0009, 9516/9530 Edmonds Way, RM-1.5 to RM-EW
3. Wireless Code Update Introduction
June 2022
June 8 1. Equitable Outreach Plan
2. Development Services Activity Report
June 22 1. Wireless Code Update Public Hearing
2. BD2 Designated Street Front
July 2022
July 13
July 27
Packet Pg. 15
items ana liates are sui
9.A.a
o change
Pending 1.
Implementation / code updates concerning trees and the UFMP
For Future 2
Climate Action Plan update and public outreach
Consideration
2022 3.
Housing policies and implementation (incl Multifamily Design)
4.
Comprehensive Plan update preparation and gap analysis
5.
Subdivision code updates
6.
Community Development Code Amendments / Re -Organization
7.
Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation (esp. 5 Corners)
8.
Low impact / stormwater code review and updates
9.
Sustainable development code(s) review and updates
10.
Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
a. Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented
design/development strategies
b. Parking standards
11.
Parkland Acquisition
12.
ADA Transition Plan
13.
CIP/CFP
Recurring 1. Election of Officers (Vt meeting in December)
Topics 2. Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department Reports & Updates- First
meeting after previous quarter (4/13, 7/13, 10/12, 1/11/23)
3. Joint meeting with City Council — April or as needed
4. Development Activity Report
r
Q
Packet Pg. 16